alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Norway (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Norway (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb   | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -----
|2011                                                                                                                              |     |       |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 3,556
|2012                                                                                                                              |     | 3,286 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 2,927
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
STATEOFDELAWAREDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCES&ENVIRONMENTALCONTROLDIVISIONOFAIRQUALITY655S.BayRoad,Suite5NDOVER,DELAWARE19901September3,2010RE:DelawareImplementationoftheGreenhouseGasTailoringRuleDearMr.Arnold:OnApril1,2010,theDelawareDepartmentofNaturalResourcesandEnvironmentalControl(DNREC)submittedtoU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)arevisiontotheDelawareStateImplementationPlan(SIP)revisingSection3.0of7DEAdminCode1141—LimitingEmissionsofVolatileOrganicCompoundsFromConsumerandCommercialProducts—PortableFuelContainers.Therevisedregulation-includesprovisionsspecifyingthatportablefuelcontainersmanufacturedonandafterJanuary1,2009willnotbesubjecttoSection3.0of7DEAdminCode1141.TheSIPrevisionandtherevisedregulationwentthroughallnecessaryrule-makingprocesses(i.e.,publicnoticing,commentingandhearing,etc.)beforetheirsubmittal.DelawarehasrealizedthattheApril1,2010submittalreferencedafederalrule“72FR8428”erroneouslyas“37FR8428.”Attachedisacorrectregulatorylanguage.Notethatthiserrorwascorrectedinthepublichearingandthehearingrecords,andhasnoeffectonanyregulatoryaspectofSection3.0of7DEAdminCode1141.Ifyouhaveanyquestionsregardingthisrequestorrequireadditionalinformation,pleasegivemeacallat(302)739-9402.Sincerely,RonaldA.AmirikianPlanningBranchManagercc:FrankGao£*€tr4’,1ruiod1€p/Mr.DavidL.ArnoldDeputyDirector,AirProtectionDivisionU.S.EPA,RegionIII(3RAOO)1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029Telephone:(302)739-9402FaxNo.:(302)739-3106‘.2UiPrintedonRecycledPaper100AirQualityManagementSection1141LimitingEmissionsofVolatileOrganicCompoundsfromConsumerandCommercialProducts4/11/20103.0PortableFuelContainers3.1Applicability*****3.1.3Therequirementsof3.0ofthisregulationapplytoanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbetweenJanuary1,2003andDecember31,2008,inclusive,exceptthatanyportablefuelcontainerorspoutorbothportablefuelcontainerandspoutmanufacturedbeforeJanuary1,2003thatdoesnotmeettherequirementsof3.0ofthisregulation,maybesold,supplied,orofferedforsaleuntilJanuary1,2004,providedthatthedateofmanufactureoradatecode,representingthedateofmanufacture,isclearlydisplayedontheportablefuelcontainerorspout.Note:Portablefuelcontainersbecameregulatedunderfederalregulation72FR8428effectiveJanuary1,2009.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Ashley, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 885]

Appeal from a judgment of Erie County Court (Drury, J.), entered March 20, 2002, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]); criminal mischief in the fourth degree (§ 145.00 [3]); obstructing governmental administration in the second degree (§ 195.05); reckless driving (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1212); and two counts of failure to stop at a stop sign (§ 1172 [a]). We reject the contentions of defendant that the search warrant issued for his person and the vehicle he was operating failed to identify the *1322person and vehicle to be searched and that the warrant was not issued upon probable cause. The police detective’s sworn application fully described the vehicle based on information furnished to the detective by the informant, and the informant appeared before the issuing Magistrate and was questioned under oath with specific reference to the subject vehicle and its occupant. Further, “the reliability prong of the *Aguilar-Spinelli*test . . . does not apply in cases of sworn oral testimony, where the issuing Magistrate can evaluate veracity to determine whether probable cause exists” *(People v Drake,*178 AD2d 929, 929 [1991]; *see People v Pratt,*266 AD2d 318 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 879 [2000]; *People v Stewart,*159 AD2d 971 [1990]; *see also People v Taylor,*73 NY2d 683, 688 [1989]). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                    5
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                   2,272
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            6,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                               137
<INVENTORY>                                             18,896
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        30,424
<PP&E>                                                   6,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                           3,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          36,327
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    2,436
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                    39
<OTHER-SE>                                              20,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            36,327
<SALES>                                                 51,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        51,855
<CGS>                                                   36,225
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           36,225
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         9,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          5,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                             1,904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      3,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                             3,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.85



</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 31.a

CERTIFICATION

I, Jack R. Mitchell, President, CEO and Director, certify that:

> I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of International
> Thunderbird Gaming Corporation;
>     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
> of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
> statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
> made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
>     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
> information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
> financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
> and for, the periods presented in this report;
>     The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
> establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
> Exchange ct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
> reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
> company and have:Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
> disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
> ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
> consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
> particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
>       Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
> internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
> to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
> and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
> with generally accepted accounting principles;
>       Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
> procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
> of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
> by this report based on such evaluation, and
>       Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
> over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
> report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
> affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and
>   5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
> our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
> company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
> (or persons performing the equivalent functions):company's ability to record, process, summarize
> and report financial information; and
>       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
> employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
> financial reporting.

Dated: July 12, 2004



Jack R. Mitchell

President, CEO and Director
# April 15 is Tax Day

/ Published April 12, 2019

April 15 is Tax Day, the deadline for submitting federal income tax returns to the federal government. It may also refer to the day when state income tax returns are due.

For people living outside the United States and Puerto Rico, Tax Day typically falls on June 15 because of the two-month automatic extension granted by IRS Publication 54.
EXHIBIT
32.2












CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of United
Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 (the “Report”) that:







1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  November
5, 2008








By:
            /s/
      Anthony J. MiceliAnthony
      J. MiceliChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,247]


Most Manufacturing, Incorporated, Including Leased Workers of 
Express Temporary Services, Colorado Springs, CO; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 20, 1998, applicable to 
workers of Most Manufacturing, Incorporated located in Colorado 
Springs, Colorado. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
April 3, 1998 (63 FR 16574).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information provided 
by the State shows that some workers of Most Manufacturing, 
Incorporated were leased from Express Temporary Services, Colorado 
Springs, Colorado. The leased workers produced optical disk drives for 
Most Manufacturing at the Colorado Springs plant. Based on these 
findings, the Department is amending the certification to include 
leased workers from Express Temporary Services, Colorado Springs, 
Colorado producing optical disk drives at the subject firms' production 
facility.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers at Most Manufacturing, Incorporated adversely affected by 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,247 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Most Manufacturing, Incorporated, Colorado 
Springs, Colorado, engaged in employment related to the production 
of optical disk drives; and leasked workers of Express Temporary 
Services, Colorado Springs, Colorado, engaged in employment related 
to the production of optical disk drives at Most Manufacturing, 
Incorporated, Colorado Springs, Colorado, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after January 28, 1997 
through March 20, 2000, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 15th day of May 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-14210 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3024

___________________________

Roscoe Chambers

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dennis Conard, Sheriff, Scott County Jail; Unknown Glasgow, Scott County Jail;

Unknown Walker, Scott County Jail; Sean ONeal, USMS; Unknown Jackson,

Scott County Jail; Humes, C/O; Clark, C/O; Kelso, C/O; Jennins, C/O; Broder,

Sgt.; Pearce, C/O; Tibbitt, Major; Shedo, C/O; Halter, C/O; Blea, C/O; Lefman,

C/O; Bibens, C/O; Bright, C/O; Boyd, Sgt.; Salsberry, Sgt.; Gaudet, Sgt.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: December 4, 2013

Filed: December 11, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Roscoe Chambers appeals the district court’s 28 U.S.C. § 1915A preservice

1

dismissal of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon de novo review, see

Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (standard of

review), we conclude that Chambers failed to state a claim upon which relief could

be granted, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (complaint must state

“more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation”; mere

conclusory statements are insufficient to support claim). We therefore affirm the

judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-
2017-1664.

#### In re Application of Ohio Edison Co.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 14-1297-EL-SSO. On motion of Ohio Edison Company, the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and the Toledo Edison Company to consolidate this cause with No. 2017-1444. Motion granted. Briefing in Nos. 2017-1444 and 2017-1664 shall be consolidated. Appellants’ brief shall be due February 5, 2018.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the “Company”)for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Troupe, the ChiefFinancial Officer, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)  or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Terry L. Troupe      |   |       |
|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
| Terry L. Troupe          |   |                      |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |                      |
| August 4, 2006           |   |                      |

 

----
#### Com. v. Parker

03/23/2016

483 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 448
#### Joeleen Rodgers, as Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Rodgers, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Debbie J. Kupka, as Executrix of Richard C. Spencer, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Charles B. Coleen, as Administrator of the Estate of Ronald J. Coleen, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 3.) Leslie K. West, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 4.) Clarence A. Friddell, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Pamela M. Friddell, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 5.) Margaret Pysczynski, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Maurice Black, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 6.) Daniel L. Kulinski, as Execu*1436tor of Carol Ann Phillips, Deceased, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 7.) Charles P. Recktenwalt, Respondent, v Allied Holdings, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Earl M. Schunk et al., Appellants. (Action No. 8.)

[768 NYS2d 910]

— Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Doyle, J.), entered December 20, 2002, which denied the motions of defendants Earl M. Schunk and Duane D. Warriner for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance of action No. 8 signed by the attorneys for the parties on November 6, 2003 and filed in the Erie County Clerk’s Office on November 18, 2003,

It is hereby ordered that said appeals from the order insofar as they concern action No. 8 be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
# C&E employees conduct spring cleaning to demonstrate VPP program commitment

/ Published March 20, 2019
PHILADELPHIA,
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER
CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ANCHOR GLASS
CONTAINER CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,130
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,660
<INVENTORY>                                    166,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               274,179
<PP&E>                                         710,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                 367,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,195,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,824
<BONDS>                                        453,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     253,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,195,601
<SALES>                                        640,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               640,049
<CGS>                                          636,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  686,890<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   792
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (124,692)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,825
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (126,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,336)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (128,853)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES A RESTRUCTURING CHARGE OF $49,973.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>