alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RON A. SPRAGU!'*
CLAUDIA D. BROWN BRIAN G. SAUCIER NEIL H. STONE GENDRY

## & SPRAGUE, 

## P.C. ATIORNEYS ATLAW

645 LOCKHILL SELMA SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78216-5057 TELEPHONE 210-349-0511 FACSIMILE 210-349-2760 March 13, 2013

CERTIFIED MAIL- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building, Suite 2W1000 Re: In the MatterofAeroweld, Inc. Docket No. CP -To Be Assigned FDMS No. FAA-2012-0909 Case No. 2011SW170132 Dear Sir or Madam:



### ... ··, ... ' THOMASW. GENDRYt - OF COUNSEL

SENDER'S E-MAILADDRESS**bsaucier@gendrysprague.co~** 

# RECEIVED MAR 18 2013 

# HEARING DOCKET

'J

t:J '••' j**(~j**

This is to advise you that the Complainant and Respondent in the above matter have reached a settlement and no longer require a hearing. Therefore, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215, the Respondent requests thatthe hearing scheduled before Judge Richard C. Goodwin on April 22, 2013 in San Antonio, Texas be withdrawn. · · ·.:. ''·

BGS/sl Please contact me at (210) 349-0511 ifyou require furtherinformation.
Sincerely,

,.. '

## ---A·····~ . ,.
·_**----~.~** Brian G. Saucier

* BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAW t BOARD CERTIFIED PERSONAL INJURY TRIAL LAW TEXAS BOARD OF LEGAL SPECIALIZATION/ 

# .·**~** Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC -430 March 13, 2013 Page 2 cc: Yolanda Ayala Bernal (via E-Mail) Office ofthe Regional Counsel (ASW-7)

.Southwest Region

Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd. Room 663 Fort Worth, Texas 76137 Telephone: (817) 222-5070 Facsimile: {817) 222-5945/5092 Yolanda.A.Bernal@faa.gov The Honorable Richard 

### C.**Goodwin~.** Administrative Law**Judg~** {via Facsimile) U.S. Department ofTransportation Office of Hearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Telephone: {202) 366-2139/5121 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 Jeffrey S. Ruth (via E-Mail) Aeroweld, Inc. 433 Breesport Street San Antonio, Texas 78216 Telephone: {210) 590-7888 Facsimile: {210) 366-2618 sruth@aogserv.com
#### SLIFKA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (two cases).

Nos. 164, 165, Docket 21513, 21514.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 3, 1950.

Decided May 22, 1950.

Herman Goldman, New York City, Elias Rosenzweig, New York City, Herman M. Brauner, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner.

Charles Oliphant, Theron L. Caudle, Washington, D. G, Harry Baum, Washington, D. G, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Special Assistants to Attorney General, for respondent.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and CHASE and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The only question upon these appeals is whether the partnerships formed by the taxpayers in 1943 were within the statutory definition of that word.1 The Supreme Court has recently three times dealt with similar situations,2 and from these deci*346sions we understand that they present instances of the more general test laid down in Gregory v. Helvering :3 i. e., whether an association, or joint venture, which satisfies all formal requirements and may be valid as between the parties, has been created to promote the conduct of their business in any other way than by reducing taxes. That this makes motive a test of taxability is true enough; but it is equally true that it makes it so only when the reduction of taxes is the sole motive. That does not mean that “business” may not be so conducted as best to keep down taxes; but it does mean that keeping down taxes is not of itself “business”. We should not be -justified in holding that, judged by that test, the Tax Court was “clearly erroneous” in holding that the “joint venture” at bar was not a “partnership.”

Orders affirmed.

1

. § 3797(aj (2), Title 26 U.S.C.A.: “The term ‘partnership’ includes a syndicate, group, pool, joint venture, or other unincorporated organization, through or by means of which any business * * * is carried on.”

2

. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 90 L.Ed. 670, 164 A.L.R. 1135; Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, 90 L.Ed. 679; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733, 69 S.Ct. 1210, 93 L.Ed. 1659.

3

. 293 U.S. 465, 55 S.Ct. 266, 70 L.Ed. 596, 97 A.L.R. 1355,
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1582

To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in New

Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States Court

of Appeals Building’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 25 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. JOHNSTON (for himself and Mr. BREAUX) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 600 Camp

Street in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘John Minor

Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building’’, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOHN MINOR WISDOM

4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS BUILD5 ING.

6 The Federal building located at 600 Camp Street in

7 New Orleans, Louisiana, is designated as the ‘‘John Minor

8 Wisdom United States Court of Appeals Building’’.
2

•S 1582 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘John Minor Wisdom United States

6 Court of Appeals Building’’.

Æ
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1761

To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1994

Referred to the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service

AN ACT

To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1.—FOREST SERVICE SEPARATION PAY.—

4 (a) In order to avoid or minimize the need for involuntary

5 separations, effective for the period beginning upon the

6 date of enactment of this Act through and including Sep7 tember 30, 1994, the Secretary of Agriculture, under such

8 regulations and subject to such conditions as the Secretary

9 of Agriculture may prescribe, shall have authority to offer

10 separation pay to employees of the Forest Service to the

11 same extent the Secretary of Defense is authorized to offer
2

S 1761 RFH

1 separation pay to employees of a defense agency in section

2 5597 of title 5, United States Code.

3 (b) In the event that an authority is enacted to offer

4 separation pay or a voluntary separation incentive similar

5 to such section 5597 of title 5, United States Code, but

6 applicable to employees in the executive branch generally,

7 the authority under subsection (a) shall terminate.

8 (c) Such payments may be made to employees who

9 agree, during a continuous 90 day period designated by

10 the agency head, beginning no earlier than the date of en11 actment of this Act and ending no later than September

12 30, 1994, to separate from service with the agency, wheth13 er by retirement or resignation.

14 (d) An employee who has received a voluntary separa15 tion incentive under this section and accepts employment

16 with the Government of the United States within 5 years

17 of the date of the separation on which payment of the in18 centive is based shall be required to repay the entire

19 amount of the incentive to the agency that paid the incen20 tive.
3

S 1761 RFH

1 (e) Total outlays by the Forest Service pursuant to

2 the cooperative work trust funds accounts (12–8028–0–

3 7–302) shall not exceed $271,668,000 in fiscal year 1994.

Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
No. 12-8763.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A.'3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dallas R. Dempster, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Dallas R. Dempster
                                          ------------------------
                                          Dallas R. Dempster
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          October 12, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharif Singletary, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 404]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alvin Yearwood, J., at plea; Raymond L. Bruce, J., at sentencing, re-plea and resentencing), rendered September 15, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1








SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350




I, A.
Bruce O’Connor, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic
report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period
covered by said periodic report.













/s/ A. Bruce O’ConnorA.
      Bruce O’ConnorChief
      Financial Officer








Date:   May
11, 2009














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Buffalo, NY Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Buffalo, NY Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb  | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2021                                                                                                                              |      |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 2.47
|2022                                                                                                                              | 2.55 | 2.53 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:August 7, 2008 | By: /s/ Alexander Y. Tokman   Alexander Y. Tokman 
 Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Oregon Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Oregon Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 78.0  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 78.0   | 80.9   | 79.3   | 71.9   | 68.6   | 74.5   | 82.0   | 83.7   | 85.7   | 86.4  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 82.3   | 78.5   | 85.6   | 82.5   | 75.1   | 66.8   | 73.4   | 78.2   | 79.9   | 81.1  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 82.9   | 82.9   | 83.3   | 83.1   | 82.8   | 85.0   | 85.6   | 84.5   | 84.4   | 84.6  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 84.0   | 83.0   | 80.7   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kerry Capellan, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 533]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered December 21, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Andrias, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
# L_2012117EN.01003001.xml

| 1.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/30

---

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Somalia/1/2011 of 6 December 2011 on the acceptance of third States’ contributions to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia)

(2011/815/CFSP)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 324 of 7 December 2011
  )

On page 36, recital 1:

for:

| ‘(1) | The Commander of EUTM Somalia held Force Generation and Manning Conferences on 17 November 2008, 16 December 2008 and 19 March 2009.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

The Commander of EUTM Somalia held Force Generation and Manning Conferences on 17 November 2008, 16 December 2008 and 19 March 2009.’,

read:

| ‘(1) | The Commander of EUTM Somalia held a Force Generation and Manning Conference on 23 August 2011.’; |
| --- | --- |

‘(1)

The Commander of EUTM Somalia held a Force Generation and Manning Conference on 23 August 2011.’;

On page 36, Article 1:

for:

‘Taking into account the findings of the Force Generation and Manning Conferences of 17 November 2008, 16 December 2008 and 19 March 2009 and ...’,

read:

‘Taking into account the findings of the Force Generation and Manning Conference of 23 August 2011 and ...’.

---
#### Maribeth D’Alauro, Appellant, v Richard Peter D’Alauro, Respondent.

[51 NYS3d 426]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (John C. Bivona, J.), dated January 14, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate a prior order of that court dated March 4, 2013, granting that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to direct the defendant to utilize a portion of his 40 IK funds to bring the mortgage on the marital residence current, and directing the defendant to act as a receiver and sell the marital residence.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order dated January 14, 2014, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of a judgment in the action dated July 21, 2015 *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(D’Alauro v D’Alauro,*150 AD3d 675 [2d Dept 2017] [decided herewith]; *see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d at 248).

Balkin, J.P., Austin, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
2017-0636.

#### State ex rel. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.L.P. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-223, 2017-Ohio-1119.
[Cite as Melvin v. Unknown , 2010-Ohio-4232.] 

# Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center
65 South Front Street, Third Floor

Columbus, OH 43215

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

www.cco.state.oh.us

EDWARD L. MELVIN II

Plaintiff

v.

UNKNOWN

Defendant

Case No. 2010-03614-AD

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On March 2, 2010, this court issued an entry dismissing the City of

Springboro as defendant and requiring the plaintiff to name a state entity as party

defendant by filing an amended complaint on or before April 1, 2010. A check of the

docket reveals the plaintiff has failed to comply with this court’s entry of March 2, 2010.

Therefore, plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The court shall absorb the

court costs of this case.

________________________________ DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk Entry cc:

Edward L. Melvin II

2566 Rockcastle CourtCase No. 2010-03614-AD - 2 - ENTRY

Case No. 2010-03614-AD - 2 - ENTRY

Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

DRB/laa

Filed 5/4/10 Sent to S.C. reporter 9/2/10