alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kathy Bolino et al., Appellants, v Livia Tam et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[767 NYS2d 883]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated August 28, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendants Livia Tam and Chris Tam for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Kathy Bolino did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated against Livia Tam and Chris Tam.

Although the respondents made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Kathy Bolino did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]), the plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition thereto were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the respondents’ motion should have been denied. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
No. 12-579.

#### Danielczyk et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2011087EN.01003101.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/31

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 58 of 3 March 2011
  )

On page 58, Annex I, entry 16:

for:

| ‘16. | AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah’, |
| --- | --- |

‘16.

AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah’,

AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah

read:

| ‘16. | AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah (Al-Megrahi)’. |
| --- | --- |

‘16.

AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah (Al-Megrahi)’.

AL-SENUSSI, Colonel Abdullah (Al-Megrahi)

---
(logo)Bank of America



NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A.                    Real Estate Loan Service Center
11000 BROKEN LAND PKWY
COLUMBIA, MD 21044-3562



March 25, 1997

TRACEY WALDMAN
11000 BROKEN LAND PKWY
COLUMBIA, MD 21044-3562



DEAR TRACEY WALDMAN



RE: SERVICING AGREEMENT COMPLIANCE, ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
     INVESTOR NO. 516, 638, P44, 791, R12
Please  be  advised  pursuant  to  our  Servicing  Department  concurrence,  the
following  areas have been certified for the Calendar Year of 1996. 

- Loans have adequate  Hazard and Flood Insurance with the Lender's Loss Payable
Clause  reading  in  favor of Bank of  America  NT & SA and its  Successors  and
Assigns.

- All FHA and Private  Mortgage  Insurance on HUD 235, and VA Guarantees  are in
full force and effect.

- Taxes,  ground rents,  and  assessments  for mortgages  have been reviewed and
there were no delinquent taxes noted.

- We are in compliance with IRS requirements  and all federal,  state, and local
laws for  reporting  the  receipt of interest  payments  and/or  acquisition  of
properties.

- All property  inspections  have been completed  according to the provisions of
our  servicing  agreement,  if  applicable.  Inspections  have  been made on all
delinquent,  foreclosed, or otherwise vacant properties,  and any other property
we had reason to believe required an inspection.

- Blanket Bond and Errors & Omission  policies are in full force,  and as usual,
the renewal notifications will be mailed to you upon receipt.

- Enclosed  please find the Uniform Single Audit Letter prepared by our external
auditors Ernst & Young along with our Corporate Annual Financial Report.


Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
10600 Valley View Street Box 6012 Cypress, CA 90630-0012    (logo)Recycled Paper


                         ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION
________________________________________________________________________________


To the best of my knowledge and upon reasonable investigation,  the servicing of
the Mortgage  Loans during the preceding  year has been  conducted in compliance
with all other provisions of the Servicing Agreement(s).  Any exceptions to this
certification  are listed on an attachment  along with  explanations  concerning
their completion.  If none are listed, it should be considered that there are no
exceptions.







By:  /s/Judy Duke Childers        VICE PRESIDENT/INVESTOR SERVICES
          (Signature)                        (Title)

     Judy Duke Childers                 March 25, 1997
     (Typed Name)                            (Date)
2016-1604.

#### State v. Haugabrook.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103693, 2016-Ohio-5838.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
~O Sr4,,~

.

Joe Frazier Manager Navajo Generating Station P.O. Box 850 Page, AZ 86040 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 February 1, 2016

Re: Proposed Minor NSR Permit for Navajo Generating Station Refined Coal System Project Dear Mr. Frazier: On February 20, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 Air Permits Office received yourapplication fora Minor New Source Review Permit underthe Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) Rule at40 CFR49.151-161 forthe addition ofa refined coal treatment system (Project). EPA has completed its review ofyourpermit application to authorize the construction and operation of the Project at Navajo Generating Station. We have prepared a proposed permitforthe Project. Enclosed is ourpublic notice, proposed permit, and technical support documentforthe Project. These and otherdocuments related to the Project are also available on ourwebsite at: http~//www.epa gov/caa permitting/tribal-nsr-permits-region-9 or at www.regulations gov under Docket ID EPA-R09-OAR2016-0026. It is Region 9’s practice to include the requirements forthe PSD and Tribal Minor NSR program in a single NSR permitdocument. As such, we are revising NGS’s existing PSD permit, No. AZ 08-O1A, to add the Tribal Minor NSR requirements ofthis action. YourTribal Minor NSR permit number is T-0004-NN. The public comment period will close on March 7, 2016. Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Larry Maurin at415- 972-3943 or maurin.lawrence@epa.gov.

Enclosures (3) Sincere!



# —j /~4Ørf. erardo C. Rios Chief, Permits Office

cc: Kyle Heckel, SRP (via email) Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA (via email)
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Elizabeth M.Braham, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of EPIQ Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and

(b)   Reserved.

(c)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisannual report based on such evaluation and

(d)   disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

**Date:      March 9, 2004**
| /s/ Elizabeth M. Braham                          |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Elizabeth M. Braham                              |
| *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* |

* *

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41362 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL CAMARON DOHERTY, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-39-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Camaron Doherty pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver amphetamine and has appealed his sentence. Doherty contends that the district court erred in refusing to adjust his offense level for acceptance of responsibility because Doherty continued to engage in criminal conduct while on pretrial release. “The district court may properly deny a reduction for acceptance of responsibility for failure to refrain from criminal conduct while on pretrial release.” United States v. Rickett ,No. 97-41362 -2- 89 F.3d 224, 227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 499 (1996). This court reviews a district court’s finding on acceptance of responsibility for clear error but “under a standard of review even more deferential than a pure clearly erroneous standard.” United States v. Gonzales , 19 F.3d 982, 983 (5th Cir. 1994) (internal citation and quotation omitted). Doherty argues that the district court did not determine as a factual matter that the alleged illegal conduct occurred while he was on pretrial release. Doherty bore the burden of showing that he was entitled to an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. United States v. Kinder , 946 F.2d 362, 367 (5th Cir. 1991). At no time, did Doherty attempt to show that the alleged criminal conduct occurred at a time prior to his release on bond. Moreover, in his order revoking Doherty’s bond, the magistrate judge found that the criminal conduct had occurred after Doherty entered his guilty plea in the instant action. Doherty contends that the district court’s finding that Doherty had not withdrawn from criminal conduct following entry of his guilty plea was not supported by sufficient evidence. The district court adopted the findings of the probation officer in the presentence investigation report. “For sentencing purposes, the district court [could] consider any relevant evidence ‘without regard to its admissibility under the rules of evidence applicable at trial, provided that the information [had] sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probableNo. 97-41362 -3- accuracy.’” United States v. Young , 981 F.2d 180, 185 (5th Cir. 1992). “[A] presentence report generally bears sufficient indicia of reliability to be considered as evidence by the trial court in making the factual determinations required by the Guidelines.” United States v. Robins , 978 F.2d 881, 889 (5th Cir. 1992). The judgment is

AFFIRMED.
*January 22, 2018*

2018-Ohio-202.]

2017-1214.

#### State ex rel. Keith v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-1080, 2017-0hio-4406. On appellant’s motion to withdraw motion to stay. Motion granted.
exv10w6xay



 







Exhibit 10.6(a)




Employee Stock Options

2003 Plan



Dear _____:




     Effective May _____, 2006 you have been granted a Non-qualified Option to purchase up to _____
shares of the common stock, par value $.25 per share, of Centex Corporation (the “Company”) for
$_____ per share (the “Option”). This Option is granted under the Centex Corporation Amended and
Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan (as such plan may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”). A
copy of the Plan is available to you upon request to the Law Department during the term of this
Option. This Option will terminate upon the close of business on May ___, 2013, unless earlier
terminated as described herein or in the Plan.



     This Award will vest at the rate of 33 1/3% per year on each of March 31, 2007, March 31,
2008, and March 31, 2009.



     If for any reason you cease to be an employee of at least one of the employers in the group of
employers consisting of the Company and its Affiliates (i) this Option will immediately terminate
as to any unvested portion on the date of such cessation and (ii) any portion of this Option vested
but not exercised by you on or before such date of cessation may be exercised after such date only
as provided in the Plan.



     The Company may cancel and revoke this Option and/or replace it with a revised option at any
time if the Company determines, in its good faith judgment, that this Option was granted to you in
error or that this Option contains an error. In the event of such determination by the Company,
and written notice thereof to you at your business or home address, all of your rights and all of
the Company’s obligations as to any unvested portion of this Option shall immediately terminate.
If the Company replaces this Option with a revised option, then you will have all of the benefits
conferred under the revised option, effective at such time as the new option goes into effect.



     This Option is subject to the Plan, and the Plan will govern where there is any inconsistency
between the Plan and this Option. The provisions of the Plan are also provisions of this Option,
and all terms, provisions and definitions set forth in the Plan are incorporated in this Option and
made a part of this Option for all purposes. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Option
will have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan. This Option has been signed in
duplicate by Centex Corporation and delivered to you, and (when you sign below) has been accepted
by you effective as of May ___, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	ACCEPTED

	 	 	 	CENTEX CORPORATION
	as of May ___, 2006
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	[Name]

	 	 	 	[Name]
	 

	 	 	 	[Title]
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          I, Timothy A. Dawson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

          1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period ended September 30, 2003;

          2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

          3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

          4.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

               a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; 

               b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

               c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant'smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likelyto materially affect the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and 

          5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

               a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

               b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controlover financial reporting.
2016-1137.

#### Willoughby Hills Dev. & Distrib., Inc. v. Testa.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2015-1069. Pursuant to S.Ct.R.Prac. 15.04(B), appellant shall file a written transcript of the Board of Tax Appeals’ hearing within 30 days. Failure to file the written transcript may result in dismissal of the appeal.
Typhoon Specifications 

Typhoon Aircraft 

Dimension 

Flight Time 

up to 25 minutes 

Weight with Battery and Payload 

60.0 oz (1700g) 

Weight without Battery and Payload 

40.0 oz (1130g) 

Battery 

5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included) 

Charger 

3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included) 

Transmitter 

10-channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included) 

3 Flight Modes 

Smart (Follow Me and Watch Me), Angle and Home 

Maximum Flying Height 

Default 122m (400ft) above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Typhoon GUI) 

Maximum Rotation Rate 

65°/s 

Maximum Roll Angle 

35° 

Operating Temperature Range 

−5°C to 80°C 

Radio Control Frequency Band 
2.4GHz 

Max. Descent Speed 

2m/s 

Max. Flight Speed 

17mph / 27 kph (Angle Mode), 22mph / 35 kph (Follow Me/Watch Me) 

Gimbal Camera 

Type 

CGO3 

Weight 

6.9oz (195g) 

Focusing System 

Aerial Optimized Fixed Focus 

Field of View 

115° 

Video Transmission Range 

FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) 

CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 ft) with ST10 

Video Resolution 

UHD: 4K at 30FPS, 2.7K at 30FPS, 2.5K at 30FPS — FULL HD: 1080p at 

24/25/30/48/50/60/120FPS 

Photo Resolution 

12 Megapixels 

Storage (memory) 

microSD Class 10 ~ 4 to 128 GB 

Control Angle Accuracy 

±0.02° 

White Balance 

Automatic or manual settings 

Transmission Band 

5.8GHz. 

Input/Operating Voltage 

12V 

Working Temperature 
−10°C–50°C 

Storage Temperature 

−20°C–60°C 

Angular Vibration Range 

±0.02° 

Control Range 

Pitch: between −90° and 0° 

Microphone 

Yes 

Camera Lens 

14mm f/2.8 – No distortion 

Sensor 

1/2.3′′ CMOS 

Personal Ground Station 

Dimensions 

Type 

ST10+ 

Operating System 

AndroidTM 

Number of Channels 

10 

Control Transmission Range (Optimum Conditions) 

FCC Compliance: Up to 800m (2624.67 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 400m 

(1312.34 ft) Warning: You Must Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of 

Sight of Aircraft at All Times 

Robust Radio Control Modulation 

Yuneec Protocol 
Video Link Frequency Band 

5.8GHz 

Video Transmission Range (Optimum Conditions) 

FCC Compliance: Up to 600m (1968.5 ft) CE Compliance: Up to 300m (984.252 

ft) Warning: You Must Follow Local Laws and Maintain Visual Line of Sight of 

Aircraft at All Times 

Flight Systems Telemetry Data On Screen Display 

Yes 

LED Backlit LCD Screen 

Capacitive Multi-touch 5.5′′

Tactile (Vibrating) and Audible Feedback 

Yes 

Built-in LiPo Battery Voltage / Capacity 

3.6V/5200mAh 18.72Wh 

Screen Resolution 

854 × 480px 

Camera Settings 

White balance, light exposure, ISO, shutter speed, video resolution, FPS, record 

video, take pictures 

CGO Steadygrip V3 

Dimensions 

Weight (without camera and gimbal) 

13.9 oz (395g) 

Compatible camera 

CGO2GB / CGO2+ / CGO3