alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Distribution Commanding Officer speaks at Support Ships 2019 conference

/ Published March 21, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Supply Corps Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones was one of several guest speakers at the 2019 Support Ships conference held in London Feb. 19 to 21.

The purpose of the conference was to provide a unique opportunity for operational commanders, logisticians and capability leads to examine and look beyond the generation and operation of new capability. The conference addressed two critical questions: What will tomorrow’s operational support requirement look like for the world’s navies, and how should the support ship adapt to meet that requirement.

During his presentation, Jones explained how DLA, specifically Distribution, is able to provide support to U.S. Naval forces worldwide with strategically-located distribution centers and materiel processing centers, allowing materiel to be closer to the customers.

Outlining DLA’s organizational structure, Jones highlighted the six major subordinate commands and their core capabilities. Further, he explained the responsibilities of DLA’s regional commands Europe and Africa, Central, South and Pacific and their interaction with U.S. combatant commands. 

“DLA provides more than $35 billion in goods and services annually,” explained Jones. “DLA also manages the reutilization and disposition of military equipment and operates a global network of distribution centers.”

Discussing Distribution’s core capabilities, Jones emphasized that the organization’s 24 distribution centers receive, store and issue materiel as well as coordinate transportation.  

Highlighting the organization’s ability to quickly respond to global events, Jones touted the organization’s expeditionary capability—essentially a distribution center in a box, “The purpose is of this capability is to provide a quick and agile distribution response to satisfy emergent or surging requirements, whenever and whenever needed.” The Expeditionary Team, along with its equipment, can deploy within 24-48 hours’ notice.

“Another tool in the distribution tool kit is the Global Distribution Expeditionary Contract,” said Jones. “This contract is ‘at the ready’ to provide the organization even more flexibility with the use of additional resources such as personnel, facilities and equipment.”  

Jones highlighted the organization’s modernization efforts and the need to remain relevant in an ever-changing environment, “Technology drives global businesses, we need to be ahead of the game when it comes to technology and supporting the warfighter; our global customers need to have the tools and supplies to perform their daily mission.” 

Closing his presentation, Jones thanked the audience of strategic partners and allies for their continued support to DLA, “Strategic partnerships are integral to our success. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to share the DLA story. Events such as this allows us to understand our similarities and differences as well as to share ideas as we support key customers around the globe,” Jones said.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of**

**Principal Executive Officer**

**of Chase Packaging Corporation Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, of Chase Packaging Corporation (the “Company”).  I, Allen T. McInnes, the Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 
| Date:  March   31, 2011 | By:    | /s/   Allen T. McInnes                         |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Allen T. McInnes                               |
|                         |   | Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer |
|                         |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |

 

1

----
No. 12-8569.

#### Jones *v.*Johnson, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Maxwell AFB opens for Hurricane Dorian support

/ Published Sept. 3, 2019
MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, Ala. (AFNS), 
At the request of the Department of Homeland Security, through U.S. Northern Command, Maxwell Air Force Base opened Aug. 29 as an Incident Support Base in advance of Hurricane Dorian.Personnel from the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Defense Logistics Agency arrived Aug. 29 to begin preparations for receiving trailers of food, water and other necessary supplies FEMA may use after the hurricane passes.“As we have for the last several hurricane seasons, the 42nd Air Base Wing and Maxwell Air Force Base are ready to support whole-of-government efforts to provide Americans emergency relief,” said Col. Patrick Carley, 42nd Air Base Wing commander. “While we don’t know what will happen when Dorian makes landfall, we can be ready to provide assistance.”In addition to more than a hundred trailers currently on base, Maxwell AFB also received helicopters from Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Florida, that evacuated in advance of the storm.“Maxwell (AFB) is a prime location to provide emergency relief support and a safe haven location during severe weather,” Carley said. “With increased activity and equipment on base, I ask that people stay away from the work sites out of safety concerns.”Maxwell AFB has provided a staging location for supplies and response teams during Hurricanes Irma, Florence and Michael in 2017 and 2018 respectively. Several hundred more trailers are expected to arrive at Maxwell AFB before Dorian makes landfall in the United States.“We hope that the storm isn’t as damaging as predicted, but we’re ready to support the staging and movement of relief supplies as part of FEMA’s effort,” Carley said.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force website.*
January 19, 2011 ^"ARTMENT OF 

': :"°0RTAT10N 

•':'T OPERATIONS 

ACTIO N 

SlO-l 10120-054 

CONTROL NO 

The o ^ 5 1 Honorable Ray LaHood "' ' 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re; Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavus. Petersburg. 

Wranaell. and Yakutat. Alaska. Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LalHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airiines to continue to provide 

essential air service to our community. 

In the community of Wrangell, the daily service provided by Alaska Airlines is vital to support the 

economic infrastructure in place after the decline of the logging industry. Daily shipping of seafood to 

mar1<ets, transporting clients, staff, and providers for the AlCS Alaska Crossings program (AlCS is the 

largest employer in Wrangell) and bringing visitors and freight to the community is a critical piece of the 

local economy. 

Alaska's current pattern of service - using jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would be difficult, if not 

impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

The 737-400 combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet earner simply 

cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation Performance 

Technology precision technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during 

inclement weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and 

products to dependably reach their destination. 

In sum, Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our community. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide essential 

air service to Southeast Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Carly Allen 

PO Box 932 

Wrangell, AK 99929 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 
Pettiford, Marie (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Carly Allen [carly.allen@akics.org] 

Wednesday, January 19, 2011 7:29 PM 

LaHood, Ray (OST) 

Kurland, Susan (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST); 

Sean.parnell@alaska.gov; MarcJuiken@alaska.gov-commissioner 

Docket OST-1998-4899 

EAS letter of support 2011 .pdf 

Carly Allen 

PC Box'932 

V^rangeii, AK 99929
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-030-08-1220-00: GP8--0197]


Notice of Meeting of the Oregon Trail Interpretive Center 
Advisory Board

agency: National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, Vale 
District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

action: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Notice is given that a meeting of the Advisory Board for the 
National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center will be held on 
Thursday, June 11, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the National 
Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, Oregon Highway 86, Flagstaff 
Hill, Baker City, Oregon 97814. At an appropriate time, the Board will 
recess for approximately one hour for lunch. Public comments will be 
received from 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., on June 11, 1998. Topics to be 
discussed are how to measure successes of the Pilot Fee Demonstration 
Program and the facility, the developing of an Action Plan, and reports 
from Coordinators of Subcommittees.
dates: The meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. and run to 4:00 p.m. June 
11, 1998.

for further information contact: David B. Hunsaker, Bureau of Land 
Management, National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, P.O. 
Box 987, Baker City, OR 97814, (Telephone 541-523-1845).
Edwin J. Singleton,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-14128 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SECOND QUARTER REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000065873
<NAME>                    ALLTEL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     28,476
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                             513,071
<ALLOWANCES>                               21,363
<INVENTORY>                                46,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          646,368
<PP&E>                                  5,245,611
<DEPRECIATION>                          2,163,254
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          5,411,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     538,673
<BONDS>                                 1,767,008
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       5,974
<PREFERRED>                                 9,186
<COMMON>                                  186,870
<OTHER-SE>                              2,026,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            5,411,387
<SALES>                                   301,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,601,185
<CGS>                                     197,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,247,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           16,874
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         63,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           461,724
<INCOME-TAX>                              186,126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       275,598
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              275,598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                       345
<INVENTORY>                                     62,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,453
<PP&E>                                         390,329
<DEPRECIATION>                                 164,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 402,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,483
<BONDS>                                         24,224
<COMMON>                                        17,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     270,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   402,387
<SALES>                                        311,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               316,790
<CGS>                                          220,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  220,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,480
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,473
<DISCONTINUED>                                     646
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Appellant, v Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 666]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award dated January 20, 2015, in which Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation cross-petitioned to confirm the award, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rebolini, J.), entered January 22, 2016, which, upon an order of the same court dated October 6, 2015, denying the petition and granting the cross petition, is in favor of Motor *1099Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation and against the petitioner in the principal sum of $50,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Where, as here, review of a compulsory arbitration award is sought, “decisional law imposes closer judicial scrutiny of the arbitrator’s determination” than would be warranted when reviewing an award made after a consensual arbitration *(Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]; *see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Labunska,*132 AD3d 861, 861 [2015]). “An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious” *(Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v City of Yonkers,*21 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2005]; *see Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.,*89 NY2d at 223; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Labunska,*132 AD3d at 861; *Matter of DiNapoli v Peak Automotive, Inc.,*34 AD3d 674, 675 [2006]). Here, contrary to Allstate’s contention, the arbitration award has evidentiary support in the record, and is not arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Labunska,*132 AD3d at 861).

The parties’ remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition to vacate the arbitration award and granted the cross petition to confirm the award.

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Connolly, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Sweetgrass, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Sweetgrass, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 1   |    
|2023                                                                                                                              | 2   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2011138EN.01005801.xml

| 26.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 138/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 138/58

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 May 2011

appointing one Dutch member of the Committee of the Regions

(2011/309/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Hans KOK, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Hans KOK,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr J.F.M. (Hans) JANSSEN, burgemeester (mayor) of Oisterwijk. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr J.F.M. (Hans) JANSSEN, burgemeester (mayor) of Oisterwijk.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 May 2011.

For the Council

The President

BALOG Z.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---