The EPA Regional Administrator, Jared Blumenfeld signed the following

proposed rule on June 12, 2013 and EPA is submitting it for publication in the Federal Register (FR). While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the proposed rule, it is not the official version of the proposed rule. Please refer to the official version in a forthcoming FR publication appearing on the Government Printing Office’s FDsys website, http://fdsys.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action and on Regulation.gov in Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0468, http://www.regulations.gov .

6560-50

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR- 2013-0468; FRL-] Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South

Coast Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern volatile organic compound (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and particulate matter (PM) emissions from open burning and wood-burning devices. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to follow with a final action.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 2 DATE: Any comments must arrive by [Insert date 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register]
. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPAR09-OAR- 2013-0468, by one of the following methods: 1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov . Follow the on-line instructions. 2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov
. 3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901. Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or e-mail. www.regulations.gov is an “anonymous access” system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automaticallyThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 3 captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov , some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4118, kay.rynda@epa.gov
. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, “we,” “us”
and “our” refer to EPA. Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 4 B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action.
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA recommendations to further improve the rules.
D. Public comment and proposed action. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit? Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Rule 444 subdivision (g) and Rule 445 subdivision (h), related to fees and penalties respectively, were excluded from the versions of the rules submitted for consideration by the EPA for SIP approval.

Table 1 - Submitted Rules

Local Agency Rule # Rule Title Amended SubmittedThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 5
Local Agency Rule # Rule Title Amended Submitted

SCAQMD 444 Open Burning 05/03/13 06/12/13
SCAQMD 445 Wood Burning Devices 05/03/13 06/12/13

We find that the submittal for SCAQMD Rules 444 and 445 meets the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules? We approved earlier versions of Rule 444 and Rule 445 into the SIP on April 8, 2002 (67 FR 16644) and June 11, 2009 (74 FR 27716) respectively. The SCAQMD adopted revisions to Rule 444 on November 7, 2008, but did not submit them to us. The SCAQMD adopted additional revisions to Rule 444 and revisions to Rule 445 on May 3, 2013, and CARB submitted these revised rules to us on June 12, 2013.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions? Emissions of VOCs and NOx help produce ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter (PM), which harm human health and the environment. PM emissions contribute to effects that are harmful to human health and the environment, including prematureThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 6 mortality, aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular disease, decreased lung function, visibility impairment, and damage to vegetation and ecosystems. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that control NOx, VOC and PM emissions. Rule 444 is designed to minimize the impacts of smoke and other air pollutants generated by open burning conducted within the SCAQMD. Changes from the SIP approved rule include the following: (a) forecast criteria for issuing permissive, marginal, and no-burn days was modified to be based on the Air Quality Index rather than on 1-hour ozone forecasted values; (b) forecast criteria for allowing a permissive burn day was amended to exclude days in which a “Mandatory Winter Burning Curtailment” day is in effect, as provided in Rule 445; (c) limited exemptions were added for burning to protect crops from freezing and for product testing; (d) daily maximum agricultural and prescribed burning acreage was increased to account for less permissive burn days resulting from the new no burn day forecast criteria (total emissions over the season/year remain the same); (e) new requirements were added for burning associated with pyrotechnics used in filmmaking, fire prevention/suppression training, prescribed burning and agricultural burning; (f)This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 7 definitions were added or amended for clarity; and (g) other minor editorial changes and clarifications were made to the rule. Rule 445 is designed to minimize the impacts of smoke and other air pollutants generated during the use of wood burning devices. The rule establishes requirements for the sale, operation, and installation of such devices. Changes from the SIP approved rule include the following: (a) the “Mandatory Winter Burning Curtailment” provision was modified to reduce the forecast threshold for a given source/receptor area from 35 to 30 μg/m3 and to add a new provision describing when such curtailment would apply basin-wide; (b) new wood-labeling requirements for wood suppliers were added; (c) a provision was removed which allowed uncertified wood-burning devices to be installed in existing homes if emission equivalency could be demonstrated; (d) modifications were made to clarify that cookstove and wood labeling exemptions apply only to commercial cooking; and (e) the definition of “Wood Burning Device” was modified to include both open and enclosed devices. EPA’s technical support documents (TSDs) contain more detailed information about these rules. II. EPA’s Evaluation and ActionThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 8 A. How is EPA evaluating the rules? Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the Act) and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate enforceability requirements consistently include the following: 1. “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations; Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register Notice,” (Blue Book), notice of availability published in the May 25, 1988 Federal Register
. 2. “Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,” EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA requires nonattainment areas to implement all reasonably available control measures (RACM), including such reductions in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonably available control technology (RACT), as expeditiously as practicable. The Los Angeles - South Coast Air Basin (South Coast) is currently designated as an extreme 1-hr ozone nonattainment area and an extreme 8-hr ozone nonattainmentThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 9 area, and is also designated nonattainment for the 1997 annual, 1997 24-hour, and 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) standards (40 CFR 81.305). Open burning emits direct PM2.5, as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx), which are regulated as precursors to PM2.5 and ozone in the South Coast. Therefore, SCAQMD must implement RACM for open burning and residential wood burning if those measures will advance attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for PM2.5 or ozone in the South Coast, when considered collectively with other reasonable measures. Additional control measures may be required pursuant to CAA section 172(c)(1) if both: (1) additional measures are reasonably available; and (2) these additional reasonably available measures will advance attainment in the area when considered collectively. The South Coast is also currently designated as a serious nonattainment area for the PM-10 NAAQS (40 CFR 81.305). On June 12, 2013, however, EPA signed a final rule to redesignate the area to attainment for the PM-10 NAAQS, which will become effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
. See “Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; California; South Coast Air Basin; Approval of PM10 MaintenanceThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 10 Plan and Redesignation to Attainment for the PM10 Standard,” pre-publication final rule signed June 12, 2013. Thus, we are not evaluating Rule 444 and 445 for compliance with BACT/BACM requirements in this rulemaking.
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria? We believe these rules are consistent with the statutory requirements concerning enforceability and SIP relaxations as interpreted in EPA guidance. Rule 444 and 445 are generally as stringent as or more stringent than analogous rules in other California Districts. As necessary, in separate rulemakings, EPA will take action on the State’s RACM demonstrations for PM2.5 and ozone based on evaluation of the control measures submitted as a whole and their overall potential to advance the applicable attainment dates in the South Coast. See 40 CFR 51.1010, 51.912(d). Our TSDs have more information on our evaluation and recommendations for additional control measures which may be reasonably available.
C. EPA recommendations to further improve the rules. The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rules but are not currently the basis for rule disapproval.
D. Public comment and proposed action.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 11 Because EPA believes the submitted rules fulfill all applicable requirements, we are proposing to fully approve them as described in section 110(k)(3) of the Act. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal for the next 30 days. Unless we receive convincing new information during the comment period, we intend to publish a final approval action that will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this proposed action:

• is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 12

• does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

• is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

• does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);

• does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; andThis document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 13

• does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed action does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.This document is a prepublication version signed by EPA Regional

Administrator Jared Blumenfeld on June 12, 2013. We have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this version, but it is not the official version. 14 AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

____________ ___ ______________________ Dated: Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX.