alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Panama (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Panama (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.80   | 7.69  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 35.2


[LOGO] GMAC Mortgage

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

                               GMAC Mortgage, LLC

                                  Impac-IM06S1

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 6th
day of March 2007.


By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
    -------------------------------
    Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
    Title: Executive Vice President








GMAC Mortgage, LLC               www.gmacmortgage.com
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            28,095
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  30,404
<CASH>                                           1,026
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,078
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  7,583
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,078
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,147
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (166)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     619
<BENEFITS>                                         662
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        201
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                       569
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                811
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       811
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0









</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains year-to-date summary financial information extracted from
Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal 2000 first quarter Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,565
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,949
<INVENTORY>                                     85,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,927
<PP&E>                                         839,910
<DEPRECIATION>                                 373,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,802
<BONDS>                                        214,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     411,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,845
<SALES>                                         96,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                96,998
<CGS>                                           93,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  104,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (635)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,991)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,552)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher R., Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 430]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gubbay, J.), rendered December 3, 2015, adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252; *People v Paige,*54AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Balkin, J.P., Miller, Duffy, LaSalle and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Hawkins

03/23/2016

482 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 656
#### Diana Worthman, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 43]

*554Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered August 4, 2015, which granted defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The City made a prima facie showing that it did not have prior written notice of the defective roadway condition that allegedly caused plaintiff to trip and fall *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]; *Yarborough v City of New York,*10 NY3d 726, 728 [2008]). Although some of the documents submitted by the City in support of its motion showed the existence of potholes and defects at the accident site during the two years leading up to the accident, there was no proof that any of these defects—all of which were repaired—were the cause of the accident. In any event, “[t]he awareness of one defect in the area is insufficient to constitute notice of a different particular defect which caused the accident” *(Roldan v City of New York,*36 AD3d 484, 484 [1st Dept 2007]). Moreover, “the City’s records of citizen reports of. . . potholes in the area and FITS reports of repairs made to potholes . . . did not provide the City with prior written notice of the particular defect in the crosswalk where plaintiff fell” *(Stoller v City of New York,*126 AD3d 452, 452 [1st Dept 2015]; *see Haulsey v City of New York,*123 AD3d 606 [1st Dept 2014]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact. There was no proof that the defect reported in a prior notice of claim was the same defect that ultimately caused plaintiff’s injury. Furthermore, plaintiff’s claim that the City’s negligent repair of the accident site created the defect did not raise an issue of fact because there was no evidence that the allegedly negligent repair immediately caused the defect, and plaintiff’s claim to the contrary was entirely speculative *(see Ragolia v City of New York,*143 AD3d 596, 597 [1st Dept 2016]; *Ghin v City of New York,*76 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

GEOFFREY ALAN BECKNER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 200 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Flournoy, Matter of, v Bezio

3d Dept: 140 AD3d 1513

denied
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code





Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned,
Bruce Johnson, the Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December
          31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







Dated:  March 14, 2003                   /s/ Bruce Johnson
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Bruce Johnson,
                                         Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial
                                         Officer
#### Theaprin Pharms., Inc. v Conway

2d Dept: 137 AD3d 1256

denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 BALANCE SHEET AND YEAR END 1999 INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         113,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,239,711
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,081,386
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,012,750
<PP&E>                                       8,447,446
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,093,456
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,600,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,879,589
<BONDS>                                     22,017,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        5,926,904
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,281,719)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,600,880
<SALES>                                     54,505,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,505,527
<CGS>                                       43,588,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,115,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,271,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,119,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,081,198
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,037,970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,037,970
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14


</TABLE>
#### Sian Green, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[57 NYS3d 1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Margaret A. Chan, J.), entered March 4, 2016, which granted the motion of defendants City of New York, New York City Department of Transportation and New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission to dismiss the complaint as against them, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was severely injured when, while standing on the sidewalk, a taxicab hopped the curb and struck her. The taxi driver had numerous penalty points on his license that might have supported a suspension of his license prior to the accident, and plaintiff alleges that the failure to suspend the driver sooner was the result of a “computer glitch” at defendant Taxi & Limousine Commission. Plaintiff seeks damages for the City defendants’ failure to enforce their own rules and regulations. However, absent a special relationship giving rise to a duty on the part of the municipality to exercise care for the benefit of a particular class of individuals, no liability may be imposed upon a municipality for failure to enforce a statute or regulation *(see Valdez v City of New York,*18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]).

Plaintiff alleges no facts sufficient to show a special duty owed by the City defendants to her. She set forth no statutory provisions or other facts to show that the taxi licensing regulations she sued under were for the benefit of a limited class of persons that included her, as opposed to the public at large *(see Burbach v City of New York,*194 AD2d 391 [1st Dept 1993]). Nor has she alleged that the City defendants voluntarily assumed a duty that generated reasonable reliance, or that they assumed positive direction and control in the face of a known, blatant and dangerous safety violation. Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed as against the City defendants *(see Metz v State of New York,*20 NY3d 175 [2012]).

As these defects were not cured by plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint, her cross motion to amend was also *440properly denied *(cf. MBIA Ins. Corp. v Greystone & Co., Inc.,*74 AD3d 499 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Renwick, Moskowitz and Kahn, JJ.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.
No. 12-8688.

#### Garcia *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-6683.

#### Williams *v.*Alabama et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                      
|No chart available.                                                      
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Alabama Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1887

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the designation of

the National Highway System, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. REID, Mr. WOFFORD, Mr.

WARNER, Mr. DURENBERGER, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for the

designation of the National Highway System, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Highway

5 System Designation Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION.

7 Section 103 of title 23, United States Code, is

8 amended by inserting after subsection (b) the following

9 new subsection:
2

•S 1887 IS

1 ‘‘(c) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNATION.—

2 ‘‘(1) DESIGNATION.—The most recent National

3 Highway System as submitted by the Secretary of

4 Transportation pursuant to this section is hereby

5 designated to be the National Highway System.

6 ‘‘(2) MODIFICATIONS.—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—At the request of a

8 State, the Secretary may—

9 ‘‘(i) add a new route segment to the

10 National Highway System, including a new

11 intermodal connection; or

12 ‘‘(ii) delete a then existing route seg13 ment and any connection to the route seg14 ment,

15 if the total mileage of the National Highway

16 System (including any route segment or connec17 tion proposed to be added under this subpara18 graph) does not exceed 165,000 miles (265,542

19 kilometers).

20 ‘‘(B) PROCEDURES FOR CHANGES RE21 QUESTED BY STATES.—Each State that makes

22 a request for a change in the National Highway

23 System pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall es24 tablish that each change in a route segment or

25 connection referred to in such subparagraph
3

•S 1887 IS

1 has been identified by the State, in cooperation

2 with local officials, pursuant to applicable

3 transportation planning activities for metropoli4 tan areas carried out under section 134 and

5 statewide planning processes carried out under

6 section 135.

7 ‘‘(3) APPROVAL BY THE SECRETARY.—The Sec8 retary may approve a request made by a State for

9 a change in the National Highway System pursuant

10 to paragraph (2) if the Secretary determines that

11 the change—

12 ‘‘(A) meets the criteria established for the

13 National Highway System under this title; and

14 ‘‘(B) enhances the national transportation

15 characteristics of the National Highway

16 System.’’.

Æ