alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            5397
<SECURITIES>                                      5500
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3978
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                       1037
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16026
<PP&E>                                            1129
<DEPRECIATION>                                     986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              567
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              656
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16687
<SALES>                                           3694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4690
<CGS>                                             1628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     53
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        33
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        



</TABLE>
# DLA Distribution celebrates 244th Navy birthday 

/ Published Oct. 18, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
To honor the United States Navy’s 244th birthday, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution employees gathered in the Distribution headquarters lobby Oct. 16.

Opening the celebration, DLA Distribution’s commanding officer Navy Rear. Adm. Kevin M. Jones thanked the Distribution workforce for the large number in attendance. 

In his remarks, Jones highlighted the theme of this year’s celebration, “No Higher Honor,” based on a quote from Lt. Cmdr. Robert Copeland written in an after-action report following the Battle of Leyte Gulf against the Japanese Imperial Navy in World War II.

“In lauding the calm courage of his crew in the face of near-certain death,” Adm. Jones recounted, “Copeland wrote that there was ‘no higher honor than the privilege to lead such a gallant crew.’”

In closing, Jones thanked the organization’s active, reserve and retired Navy sailors, and invited them forward to help cut the ceremonial cake.
# L_2011131EN.01002602.xml

| 18.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 131/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 131/26

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/28/EU of 12 July 2010 on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the general principles for the participation of the Republic of Moldova in Union programmes

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 14 of 19 January 2011
  )

The publication of Decision 2011/28/EU is to be considered null and void.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompanythe Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SECRelease No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,nor shall be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maui Land &Pineapple Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), we, **Warren H. Haruki**and **Tim T. Esaki**, respectively,the Chairman & Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Warren H. Haruki                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Warren  H. Haruki                                                                   |   |
| Chairman & Interim Chief Executive  Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                                                                                |   |
| Date:  November 2, 2010                                                        |   |
|                                                                                |   |
| /s/  Tim T. Esaki                                                                   |   |
| Tim  T. Esaki                                                                       |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)                              |   |
|                                                                                |   |
| Date:  November 2, 2010                                                        |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 3781 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 048 - AD Helicopter Model: Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 142 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The proposed actions are intended to detect a crack on the drive shaft to prevent failure of the driveshaft, failure of the tail rotor, and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs : Parts per Helicopter for the inspection $ 0 Labor per Helicopter ( 9 work hours X $85 for inspection) $ 765
Other (Explain) 

### Replacing the drive shaft would not require additional labor hours, but parts would cost $6,082 per helicopter. Total Cost per Helicopter per inspection $765 Total US Fleet Cost per inspection $108,630 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Martin R. Crane
1

**Participants at the 4 -**  **6 -**  **2011 conference call on rulemakings affecting EGUs OAR**  Bob Wayland Mary Johnson Bill Maxwell Linda Chappell Larry Sorrels Tim Smith Ely se Steiner Nick Hutson Kevin Culligan **OW** Julie Hewitt **OP** Lanelle Wiggins Paul Balserak **OMB** Cortney Higgins **INDUSTRY** Central Iowa Power Cooperative Cedar Rapids, IA Rex Butler 319 - 366 - 8011 rex.butler@cipco.net Holland Board of Public Works Holland, MI Daniel Nall y 616 - 355 - 1641 dnally@hollandbpw.com Jamestown Board of Public Utilities Jamestown, NY Steve Kulig 716 - 661 - 16 97 skulig@jamestownbpu.com Mid - Kansas Electric Company (operated under contract by Sunflower Electric) Hay s, K S Way ne Penrod2

785 - 623 - 3313 WPenrod@sunflower.net Morgan City Morgan City , LA Louisiana Energy

& Power Authority (operates Morgan City power plant) Kevin Bihm 337 - 269 - 4046 kbihm@lepa.com Muscatine Power & Water Muscatine, IA Donald Pauken 563 - 262 - 3394 dpauken@mpw.org S an Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc. Joe Eutizi Christine, TX 830 - 784 - 3411 , ext. 226 jeutizi@smeci.net Southern Illinois Power Cooperative Marion, IL Leonard Hopkins 618 - 964 - 1448 , ext. 268 LHopkins@sipower.org Texas Municipal Power Agency Bryan, TX Ken Babb 936 - 873 - 1516 kbabb@texasmpa.org Bill Wemhoff Sr. Principal, Environmental Policy NRECA Arlington, VA 703 - 907 - 5824 bill.wemhoff@nreca.coop Michael Rossler Manager Environmental Programs EEI Washington, D.C. 202 - 508 - 5516 mrossler@eei.org3

Andrea Field Attorney at Law Hunton & Williams Washington, D.C. 202 - 955 - 1500 afield@hunton.com
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Department policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and Section 122 
of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622, notice is hereby given that on May 12, 1998 
a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc. 
et. al., Civil Action No. 1:98CV389, was lodged with United States 
District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division. 
This consent decree represents a settlement of claims brought by the 
United States, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq., against 
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. and Slezak Enterprises Inc., for 
reimbursement of response costs and injunctive relief in connection 
with the Roto-Finish Superfund Site (``Site'') located in Kalamazoo 
County, Michigan.
    Under this settlement with the United States, Illinois Tool Works 
Inc. and Slezak Enterprises, Inc. will implement the remedy for the 
Site as set forth in the Record of Decision issued by the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency in March 1997, and pay $723,900 in 
reimbursement of response costs incurred by the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency at the Site. In addition, Illinois Tool 
Works Inc. and Slezak Enterprises, Inc. will pay all future costs for 
this response action, including U.S. EPA's oversight costs.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v, Illinois Tool Works, Inc. et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-
1278.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Western District of Michigan, Southern 
Division, 330 Ionia Avenue, N.W., Suite 501, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, at 
the Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West 
Jackson Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 
624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in 
person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 
4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose 
a check in the amount of $18.00 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-14336 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# FMWR promoting resiliency and readiness on Defense Supply Center Richmond

/ Published Dec. 5, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
At high noon, on the first Wednesday of every month, for the past five months, anywhere from two to a dozen people gathered at either Parker Pond Pavilion or the Community Center on the Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, to learn different ways to recharge their mental and physical batteries.

Melissa Futreal, family programs manager, Family, Morale, Welfare and Recreation Office, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Management Richmond, leads the class. She said it’s part of the FMWR Office’s Family Program Initiative to promote resiliency and readiness within the workforce by using evidence-based techniques, such as learning various breathing techniques, yoga, Tai Chi and meditation.

Data-backed benefits of incorporating wellness programs in the workplace include:
      - Increase healthy behavior and curb the risk of lifestyle-related disease.
      - Increase engagement.
      - Well-being increases adaptability.
      - Boost productivity.
      - Have a positive influence on workplace culture.
      - Decrease depression.
      - Bring employees together and build camaraderie.

Futreal said 2020 will bring several changes to the program. Starting Jan. 7, the class will be held on the first Tuesday of each month and the name will change to Tension Tamer Tuesdays. The location is also changing from Parkers Pond Pavilion and the Community Center to Bldg. 70, directly in front of the Virginia National Guard Headquarters building. The class time will remain the same, Noon – 1 p.m.
No. 12-8670.

#### Salazar *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Distribution Commanding Officer presents awards, discusses strategic plan at town hall

/ Published Nov. 26, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones hosted a DLA Distribution town hall Nov. 18 at the organization’s New Cumberland, Pennsylvania, headquarters. The town hall began with Jones recognizing Distribution employees with awards for individual and team accomplishments followed by an overview of recent updates to DLA Distribution’s dynamic operating plan for fiscal years 2020-2021 and fiscal year 2030 campaign plan. The Distribution plans nest within the DLA 2018-2026 strategic plan goals. Each subordinate element feeds back to the next higher plan for future improvements.

Key components of the fiscal year 2030 campaign plan are 12 initiatives central to Distribution:
      - Realize Reform Savings
      - Enforce Compliance
      - Reduce Costs
      - Develop Leaders
      - Establish Requisite Skills for New Hires/All Employees
      - Transform Training
      - Implement and Sustain Modernization
      - Simplify Processes
      - Transform Production
      - Reengineer How We See Ourselves
      - Increase Productivity
      - Intensively Manage Inventory Accuracy

A new line of effort was added to the campaign plan this year—aimed at bringing Distribution into the 21st century.

The fiscal year 2020-2021 DOP was signed by Jones Sept. 30 and includes seven lines of effort linked to DLA’s strategic plan.

Jones also touted his fiscal year 2020 annual guidance, or “tone at the top” memo to leadership. The key focus areas of the guidance include:
      - Cultural change
      - Quality as our number one priority
      - Improve and meet required audit goals
      - Performance metrics

“Quality is our number one priority,” Jones said. “If you’ve been following this ‘audit journey,’ then you know that our part is inventory accuracy. We need to focus on what it will take to drive the quality up while decreasing human error.”

Additional comments by the commanding officer included ensuring employees are taking care of themselves--getting proper rest during the changeover to Daylight Standard Time, managing holiday stress and staying alert while driving during inclement weather and as deer are crossing roadways during hunting seasons.
#### In the Matter of Tiffany N.L., an Infant. Marcelino L., Appellant; New York Foundling Hospital, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 13]

Order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper), Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about April 6, 2016, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent father’s parental rights to the subject child and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of New York City Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supported the determination that the father permanently neglected the subject child by failing to visit consistently and by failing to plan for her future, despite the agency’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a], [c], [f]; *Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 140 [1984]; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 384-386 [1984]). The record shows that although the father was made aware of the need for him to, among other things, attend and complete a drug treatment program and obtain suitable housing, he refused to avail himself of these services and comply with his service plan. The father also failed to visit consistently with the child and behaved inappropriately during visits, frightening the child *(see Matter of Charles Michael J.,*58 AD3d 401, 402 [1st Dept 2009]). Overnight, unsupervised visitation with the child was suspended after the child returned from such visits with injuries requiring medical treatment.

*500The record supports the determination that the child’s best interests would be served by terminating the father’s parental rights and freeing the child for adoption by her foster mother, with whom the child has lived since she was three days old, and who has met all of her special needs and wants to adopt her *(Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d at 147-148). There was no evidence that the father had any feasible plan to care for the child *(see Matter of Olushola W.A.,*41 AD3d 179, 180 [1st Dept 2007]).

We have considered the father’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.
# Employee Working Group holds monthly meeting

/ Published Sept. 10, 2019
Richmond, Va., 
Employees gathered in person and on the phone Sept. 3 for the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Employee Working Group monthly meeting. Summer Conley Payton, EWG chairperson, and Harris “Jay” Greene, EWG vice-chairperson, shared info with more than 45 employees during the quick 15-minute meeting.

Conley Payton shared the upcoming agenda for the Quarterly Forum which will be held Sept. 17 in the Frank Lotts Conference Center, while Greene shared that the monetary award for the Employee of the Month has increased to $750 and plans are in progress to potentially raise the amount to $1000. 

During September's forum, employees will learn about DLA Installation Management Richmond’s Security & Emergency Services as well as receive activity updates from DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli and current IT issues from Martin Steiner, J6 Business Relationship Management for DLA Aviation.

“During the forum, we will recognize our recent Employee of the Month recipients’ award-winning accomplishments.” said Conley Payton. 

“At October’s EWG meeting we will be accepting self-nominations for the EWG officer positions for the next calendar year,” she said.  Officer positions will be reduced to the chairperson, vice-chairperson and secretary roles based on feedback from the working group and will be voted on during the October meeting.

Employees may learn more about the EWG and its officer positions by accessing the EWG homepage on eWorkplace.
#### Shirley Wong, Appellant, v James S. Tang, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 381]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated October 18, 2002, which, upon granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law made at the conclusion of the plaintiffs case, dismissed the complaint for failure to make out a prima facie case.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the motion is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and a new trial is granted, with costs to abide the event.

To be awarded judgment as a matter of law pursuant to CPLR 4401, a defendant has the burden of showing that, upon viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, there is no rational process by which the jury could find for the plaintiff against the moving defendant *(see Lyons v McCauley,*252 AD2d 516, 517 [1998]; *Farrukh v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*227 AD2d 440 [1996]). The plaintiffs evidence must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff is entitled to every favorable inference which can be reasonably drawn therefrom *(see Farrukh v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., supra; Zboray v Fessler,*154 AD2d 367 [1989]; *Pontiatowski v Baskin-Robbins,*91 AD2d 1035 [1983]).

The plaintiffs medical expert witness testified, inter alia, that upon diagnosing the decedent as suffering from a myocardial infarction, the defendant’s failure to call for an ambulance to transport the decedent to a hospital was a departure from good and accepted standards of medical care which was a substantial factor in causing the decedent’s death *(see Cavlin v New York Med. Group,*286 AD2d 469, 470 [2001]; *Jump v Facelle,*275 AD2d 345, 346 [2000]; *Mortensen v Memorial Hosp.,*105 AD2d 151, 158 [1984]). “It was not necessary for the plaintiff to eliminate every other possible cause of the decedent’s death” *(Cavlin v New York Med. Group, supra*at 470; *see Mortensen v Memorial Hosp., supra).*The plaintiff simply had to show that “it was probable that some diminution in the chance of survival had oc*841curred” *(Jump v Facelle, supra*at 346; *see also Cavlin v New York Med. Group, supra).*The plaintiff’s expert’s testimony-satisfied this burden.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
#### Com. v. Miles 22

12/29/2015

467 EAL (2015)

22

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 47 A.3d 1238
No. 12-7981.

#### Odoms *v.*Skolnik et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-8201.

#### Birdette et al. *v.*Douglas County Board of Education et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.