alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-219-000]


Northwest Alaskan Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Changes

May 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 15, 1998, Northwest Alaskan Pipeline 
Company (Northwest Alaskan), tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 2, Forty-Second Revised Sheet No. 5, 
with an effective date of July 1, 1998.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it is submitting Forty-Second Revised 
Sheet No. 5 reflecting a decrease in total demand charges for Canadian 
gas purchased by Northwest Alaskan from Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd. (Pan-
Alberta) and resold to Pan-Alberta Gas (U.S.), Inc. (PAG-US) under Rate 
Schedules X-1, X-2, and X-3, and a decrease in total demand charges for 
Canadian gas purchased from Pan-Alberta and resold to Pacific 
Interstate Transmission Company (PIT) under Rate Schedule X-4.
    Northwest Alaskan states that it is submitting Forty-Second Revised 
Sheet No. 5 pursuant to the provisions of the amended purchase 
agreements between Northwest Alaskan and PAG-US and PIT, and pursuant 
to Rate Schedules X-1, X-2, X-3, and X-4, which provide for Northwest 
Alaskan to file 45 days prior to the commencement of the next demand 
charge period (July 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998) the demand 
charges and demand charge adjustments which Northwest Alaskan will 
charge during the period.
    Northwest Alaskan states that a copy of this filing has been served 
on Northwest Alaskan's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14073 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 164 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 24

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 164

                          [Report No. 103-10]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota 
portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

               March 11 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                        Calendar No. 24
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 164

                          [Report No. 103-10]

   To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota 
portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Daschle (for himself and Mr. Pressler) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

               March 11 (legislative day, March 3), 1993

              Reported by Mr. Johnston, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota 
portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIOUX RANGER DISTRICT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with the Act entitled ``An Act to 
consolidate national forest lands'', approved March 20, 1922 (16 U.S.C. 
485 et seq.), and in exchange for national forest lands in Custer 
National Forest, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept title to any 
lands located within 5 miles of the exterior boundaries of the South 
Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest 
that are not owned by the United States and that are found by the 
Secretary of Agriculture to be chiefly valuable for national forest 
purposes.
    (b) Incorporation Into Custer National Forest.--Upon acceptance of 
title by the Secretary of Agriculture, lands conveyed to the United 
States in accordance with subsection (a) shall become part of Custer 
National Forest.
```
#### Com. v. Perry12

06/28/2016

40 MAL (2016)

12

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 128 A.3d 1285
# Distribution celebrates Black History Month

/ Published March 18, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution’s Multicultural Committee celebrated the culture, traditions and history of African Americans with a program held Tuesday, Feb. 26. This year’s theme is “Black Migrations.”

The Black Migration, was the movement of six million African-Americans out of the rural Southern United States to the urban Northeast, Midwest, and West that occurred between 1916 and 1970.

The program opened with Betty Joyner and Yonda Spradley performing the National Anthem, followed by an invocation by Marlon Carter, supply management specialist with Distribution Headquarters. As well as a video explaining Black Migrations.

DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones welcomed everyone in attendance, “It is hard for me to follow the video about the heroes who have walked before us. That video brings to life the theme of this year’s annual celebration, and emphasizes the movement of people of African descent to new destinations and social realities.” 

Jones introduced Ramona French, chief of Distributions Future Plans Integration Division who performed two poems, one she personally wrote and the other written by Langston Hughes. Casaya Achampong accompanied her on the bongos as she recited each poem.

Joyner and Spradley took the stage for a second time to perform a song that led into French’s presentation of the Langston Hughes poem.

Following the presentation, Jones rejoined everyone on stage and presented certificates of appreciation. He presented French with the first-ever DLA Distribution Multicultural Committee appreciation plaque.
*Anthony J. Principi has been appointed to serve as Secretary of Veterans Affairs

and is substituted as appellee under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2237

___________

Rita Graham, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States 

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Missouri.

Anthony J. Principi,* Secretary of *

Veterans Affairs; Veterans * [UNPUBLISHED]

Administration, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 4, 2001

Filed: May 10, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Rita Graham appeals the district court's adverse grant of judgment as a matter

of law in Graham's employment discrimination lawsuit. Having reviewed the parties'

briefs, the pretrial record, and a transcript of the district court's ruling--the only
-2-

transcript furnished on appeal--we find no grounds for reversal of the challenged ruling

on Graham's claims of race discrimination and retaliation. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2)

(appellant has duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters and

Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant's failure to provide

complete transcript makes it impossible to review evidence presented at trial), cert.

denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988). We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-216-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Petition for 
Declaratory Order

May 19, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 8, 1998, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 207(a)(2)), 
Northwest Pipeline Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing a 
petition for a declaratory order.
    Northwest requests the Commission to assist Northwest in 
determining the appropriate final confirmed volume between Northwest 
and PG&E Gas Transmission-Northwest (GT-NW) at the points of their 
interconnection. Northwest argues that because currently effective GISB 
standards do not specifically address pipeline to pipeline 
communication and confirmation standards, Northwest seeks the 
Commission's assistance in resolving the dispute between Northwest and 
GT-NW.
    Northwest respectfully requests the Commission to provide guidance 
concerning how final confirmed volumes should be determined. Northwest 
submits that for the locked-in period from August 1997 until the 
implementation of Order No. 587-G, GT-NW should be directed to 
recognize Northwest's ``Evening Confirmation'' as the start of gas day 
confirmation. Implementation of Order No. 587-G, supported by Northwest 
regarding this issue, will eliminate future confirmation disputes 
between Northwest and GT-NW.
    Northwest argues that because of the significance of this issue, 
and the fact that timing issues affect pipelines throughout the 
country, Northwest submits that it is appropriate for the Commission to 
determine how this issue should be resolved in light of GISB standards, 
rather than leaving the parties to construe individual operating and 
balancing agreement terms.
    Northwest states that copies of the filing has been served upon all 
jurisdictional customers and affected state commissioners.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before June 8, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13828 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-553.

#### Glenn et al. *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2016-1911.

#### State ex rel. Evans v. McGrath.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-238, 2016-Ohio-8348. Reported at 151 Ohio St.3d 345, 2017-0hio-8290, 88 N.E.3d 957. On appellant’s motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-58-002]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

January 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 12, 1998, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain revised tariff 
sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 which tariff 
sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing. The 
referenced tariff sheets are proposed to be effective December 21, 
1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to comply 
with the Commission's order issued January 7, 1998 in Docket No. RP98-
58-001. Such order required Transco to refile tariff sheets that were 
duplicatively numbered in Transco's December 23, 1997 filing in that 
docket. Transco tendered the sheets enumerated in Appendix A with the 
revised pagination.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing on 
parties to Docket No. RP98-58 and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1440 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29769-29770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of New York dated July 22, 
1993, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes 
the license of ODA Capital Corporation, a New York corporation, to 
function as

[[Page 29770]]

a small business investment company under Small Business Investment 
Company License No. 02/02-5307 issued to ODA Capital Corporation on 
January 25, 1977 and said license is hereby declared null and void as 
of July 22, 1993.

    Dated: May 20, 1998.

Small Business Administration.
Harry E. Haskins,
Acting Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 98-14327 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
No. 12-633.

#### Bigio et al. *v.*Coca-Cola Co. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
exv10w43



 







SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY

EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN




          This Second Amendment to the International Transmission Company Executive Supplemental
Retirement Plan (“Plan”), established effective March 1, 2003 to supplement the pension benefits of
certain executives and key management employees of ITC Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries, is
hereby adopted pursuant to the amendment power reserved in Section 10.01 of the Plan, effective as
of January 1, 2006:




          1.      Section 2.18 of the Plan is restated in its entirety, to read as follows:




          "2.18 “Investment Credit” means the hypothetical earnings posted to the Participant’s Account
each Plan Year. The Investment Credit will be equal to the same earnings rate that is determined
from time to time as the “Interest Credit” applied to the cash balance accounts for participants
under Section 5.02(d) of the International Transmission Company Retirement Plan.”




          2.      Section 4.01 of the Plan is restated in its entirety, to read as follows:




          "4.01 Establishment of Accounts. The Committee shall establish a hypothetical
bookkeeping Account for each Participant. The initial value of a Participant’s Account shall be
zero. Compensation Credits shall be credited to a Participant’s Account as of the last business
day of the Plan Year. The Participant’s Account at the end of the first Plan Year in which the
Participant commences participation in the Plan shall equal the Compensation Credit for the
Participant for that Plan Year, less the “Special Employer Contribution” (if any) made with respect
to the Participant under Section 5.02(i) of the International Transmission Company Retirement Plan.




            In all subsequent years, the Participant’s Account shall be recalculated at the end of each
Plan Year, and shall equal the sum of the following:



            (a)      the prior Plan Year’s ending balance of the Account; plus



            (b)      the Investment Credit on the prior Plan Year’s ending Account balance; plus



            (c)      the Compensation Credit for the Participant for the current Plan Year, less the “Special
Employer Contribution” (if any) made with respect to the Participant under Section 5.02(i) of the
International Transmission Company Retirement Plan.”



 









 





ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2006, effective as of January 1, 2006.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ITC HOLDINGS CORP.


 	 
	 	     By /s/Daniel J. Oginsky
 	 
	 	Title Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
# DLA Aviation San Diego teaming up to improve warfighter support one kit at a time 

/ Published March 4, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
With the snip of a large pair of ceremonial scissors, a new era was ushered in on Naval Air Station North Island, Coronado, California Feb. 22. The ribbon cutting ceremony officially recognized the opening of the Building 472 Kitting shop. While the ceremony was small, its importance to providing service to the nation’s warfighters is invaluable. 

The Kitting shop is the result of a strong partnership between Defense Logistics Agency Aviation San Diego, DLA Distribution San Diego and Fleet Readiness Center Southwest. Its goal is to increase readiness of Navy and Marine Corps F/A 18 Super Hornet fighter jets by reducing material delays for parts needed to keep them flying.

This initiative significantly reduces repair turnaround time by providing piece parts in complete repair kits for in the production line inventory. This effort started with 17 component kits, comprised of about 996 national item identification numbers, with plans to extend to the hydraulic, landing gear and canopy shops.

Navy Capt. Anthony Jaramillo, commanding officer, Fleet Readiness Center Southwest, said the Navy’s overall goal is to have 341 mission capable Rhino’s, as F/A 18 Super Hornets are called, by October. He said right now, the Navy is sitting at around 270.

“We need to make sure this is enduring and this is the type of work we are going to continue doing each and every day for the rest of our Navy careers and then turn it over to our brothers and sisters to take it over behind us,” Jaramillo said. 

FRC customers will only be billed for materials used, and all unused materials will be returned to the shop to build new kits while used materials are replenished.This endeavor not only provides the customer with a more streamlined process to increase the throughput within the FRC, but also gives a more accurate demand signal for material.

Navy Capt. Jerome White, commander, DLA Distribution San Diego, was also on hand for the ribbon cutting. He expressed his appreciation for what can be accomplished when supporting a common goal is the top priority.

“Thanks to all of you for your ability to put organizational identities aside and work together as one team in support of a critical fleet requirement,” White said.

Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry officiated the ceremony.

She said the partnership is a great example of teamwork and forward thinking ingenuity and directly supports the Navy’s Sustainment Strategy Supply Chain reform efforts. 

“This initiative reflects months of hard work, dedication to improving processes, and providing best-in-class service to the men and women of our Navy and Marine Corps team,” she said.

The initiative also falls in line with DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams’ focus on building stronger partnerships designed to meet long-term objectives and produce the most cost-effective and innovative solutions to our customers.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of San Elizario, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of San Elizario, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 2.62   | 2.12   | 1.06  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.31   | 4.90   | 5.69   | 1.94   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024