alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1667

AN ACT

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace

Facilitation Act of 1993 by six months.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1667

AN ACT

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace

Facilitation Act of 1993 by six months.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

4 Section 3(a) of the Middle East Peace Facilitation

5 Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–125) is amended by striking

6 ‘‘January 1’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘July 1’’.

Passed the Senate November 17 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.24   | 6.98   | --     | 5.85   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation* 
 Effective May 19, 2006 
  

					
	 Annual Compensation
	  	$	40,000	**
		
	 Fees for Chairman of Audit Committee
	  	$	10,000	***

 Stock Purchase Participation Grants 
 -Grant of shares in the amount equal to  1/3 of the purchase price of stock purchased by each Director 
 -Grants not to exceed $15,000 in stock per year
per Director 
 -Subject to and in accordance with the Company’s 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan 
 *Subject to vesting upon Director attending 60% of all regular and special Board meetings through the Company’s 2007 annual meeting of shareholders 
 **Payable in cash or restricted stock of the Company 
 ***Payable in
restricted stock of the Company
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29733-29734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14434]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6104-6]


Proposed CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the Jomarc 
Property

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposal of CERCLA Prospective Purchaser Agreement for the 
Jomar Property of the Kysor Industrial Corporation superfund site and 
the Northernaire Plating Company superfund site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorizations Act 
of 1986 (SARA), Pub. L. 99-499, notification is hereby given that a 
proposed prospective purhchaser agreement (PPA) for the Jomarc Property 
which is within the boundaries of the Kysor Industrial Corporation 
Superfund Site and the Northernaire Plating Company Superfund Site 
located in Cadillac, Michigan, has been executed by R. Walker 
Construction Co. The proposed PPA has been submitted to the Attorney 
General for approval. The proposed PPA would resolve certain potential 
claims of the United States under sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42 
U.S.C. Sections 9606, and 9607, against R. Walker Construction Co. The 
proposed PPA would require R. Walker Construction Co. to remove an 
underground storage tank and to remediate two areas of soil 
contamination with the oversight of the Michigan Department of 
Environmental Quality. The Jomarc Property is not on the National 
Priorities List (NPL), but is within the boundaries of the Kysor

[[Page 29734]]

Industrial Corporation Superfund Site and the Northernaire Plating 
Company Superfund Site both of which are listed on the NPL. The 
construction of the Remedial Action is complete at those Sites and no 
further response actions are contemplated at this time.

DATES: Comments on the proposed PPA must be received by EPA within June 
22, 1998.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the proposed PPA is available for review at U.S. 
EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 
Please contact Cynthia A. King at (312) 886-6831, prior to visiting the 
Region 5 office.
    Comments on the proposed PPA should be addressed to Cynthia A. 
King, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard (Mail Code C-14J), Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Cynthia A. King at (312) 8886-6831, 
of the U.S. EPA Region 5, Office of Regional Counsel.
    A 20-day period, commencing on the date of publication of this 
notice, is open for comments on the proposed PPA. Comments should be 
sent to the addressee identified in this document.
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 98-14434 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Golden Queen Mining Co.
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 31, 2006 | Signed: /s/ H. Lutz Klingmann            
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                      | H. Lutz Klingmann                        
|                      | President and principal financial officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDING JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        225
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,956
<PP&E>                                           5,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,328
<BONDS>                                          1,980
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,826
<SALES>                                          7,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,771
<CGS>                                            7,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (22)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    114
<INCOME-TAX>                                        37
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 77
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        77
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83


</TABLE>
No. 12-6278.

#### Pagan *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0557

VERSUS

STANLEY JAMES BRUMFIELD JULY 18, 2022

In Re: Stanley James Brumfield, applying for supervisory

writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Terrebonne, No. 713, 585. 

BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

GH

AHP

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

1.(;j

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
*February 16, 2017*

2017-Ohio-528.]

2016-0172.

#### Cleveland v. Oles.

Cuyahoga App. No. 102835, 2016-Ohio-23. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellant and amicus curiae Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney for divided argument time on Wednesday, March 1, 2017, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDING SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      234
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   572
<PP&E>                                            2350
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         25
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                         937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3962
<SALES>                                           2742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2742
<CGS>                                             2086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    135
<INCOME-TAX>                                        57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 78
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        78
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-736.

#### Sibley *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7684.

#### Burgess *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Mark J. Schager et al., Appellants, v Lino Bordi, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 385]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated February 6, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

At 2:45 p.m., on November 6, 2001, the then 17-year-old plaintiff Mark Justin Schager (hereinafter Schager), a pedestrian, was crossing Willis Avenue at its intersection with Lafayette Street in Williston Park, when he was struck by a 33,000-pound truck operated by the defendant Louis J. Oliveri, owned by the defendant Lino Bordi, Inc., and allegedly registered to the defendant Oxford Truck Leasing Corp.

The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was properly denied. Issues of fact exist as to whether Oliveri exercised reasonable care in an effort to comply with Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1126 (a), thereby excusing his violation of the statute *(see Espinal v Sureau,*262 AD2d 523 [1999]), or whether Schager was comparatively negligent in causing his injuries *(see Dragunova v Dondero,*305 AD2d 449 [2003]; *cf. Tran v Nowak,*245 AD2d 1083 [1997]). Smith, J.P., Luciano, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
considered aggravating and mitigating factors. The panel found six 

aggravating factors: (1) prior disciplinary offenses; (2) a pattern of 

misconduct; (3) multiple offenses; (4) bad faith obstruction of the 

disciplinary proceedings by intentionally failing to comply with rules or 

orders; (5) refusal to acknowledge the wrongful nature of conduct; and (6) 

substantial experience in the practice of law. The panel found one 

mitigating factor: absence of dishonest or selfish motive. 

This court's automatic review of a disciplinary panel's findings 

and recommendations is de novo, SCR 105(3)(b); In re Discipline of Stuhff, 

108 Nev. 629, 633, 837 P.2d 853, 855 (1992), and therefore we "must 

examine the record anew and exercise independent judgment," In re 

Discipline of Schaefer, 117 Nev. 496, 515, 25 P.3d 191, 204 (2001). 

Although we are not bound by the disciplinary panel's recommendations, 

those recommendations are persuasive. Id. The State Bar has the burden 

of showing by clear and convincing evidence that Grayson committed the 

violations charged. In re Discipline of Drakulich, 111 Nev. 1556,1566, 908 

P.2d 709, 715 (1995). 

We conclude that there is clear and convincing evidence in the 

record before us that demonstrates that Grayson committed the violations 

of the Rules of Professional Conduct as found by the hearing panel, and 

that the panel's recommendation is appropriate. 

Accordingly, attorney Robert Grayson is hereby suspended 

from the practice of law for 12 months beginning on the date of this order. 

At the completion of his term of suspension, Grayson shall comply with 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 
Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

SCR 116 upon any petition for reinstatement. Pursuant to SCR 120, 

Grayson shall also pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings. Grayson 

shall comply with SCR 115 and the State Bar shall comply with SCR 

121.1. 

It is so ORDERED. 

Saitta 

Pickering 

cc: Chair, Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board 

Robert A. Grayson 

Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada 

Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada 

Perry Thompson, Admissions Officer, U.S. Supreme Court 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3 

(0) 1947A en
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Larry D. Kirkland, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 673]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Rowley, J.), rendered October 11, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree.

In full satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree. As part of the plea agreement, defendant executed a written waiver of his right to appeal. At sentencing, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent prison terms of 2 to 6 years for driving while intoxicated and 1 to 3 years for aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle.

Initially, defendant argues that his waiver of the right to appeal must be invalidated because it was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. The failure, however, to move to withdraw his guilty plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders the challenge unpreserved *(see People v Powers,*302 AD2d 685, 685 [2003]). Even if we were to consider the merits of this argument, we would find them unpersuasive. County Court fully inquired as to whether defendant voluntarily executed the waiver and understood the rights that he would be surrendering and, thus, defendant’s waiver of appeal was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made *(see People v Ubrich,*245 AD2d 886, 887 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 945 [1998]). In addition, defendant argues that his waiver of appeal should be annulled because he was not properly informed of the maximum potential sentences that could have been imposed. As defendant was aware of the specific sentence to be imposed at sentencing, this argument is also without merit *(see People v Grant,*294 AD2d 671, 672-673 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 730 [2002]).

Finally, having found that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal, defendant’s challenges to the effectiveness of counsel, which do not implicate the voluntariness of his plea, and the harshness of his sentence have not been preserved for our review *(see People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]; *People v Newell,*271 AD2d 873, 874 [2000], *1064
      *lv denied*95 NY2d 837 [2000]). We are compelled to note that, in any event, in light of defendant’s extensive criminal history, including five prior drinking and driving offenses, we would not find the sentence imposed to be harsh or excessive (see *People v Creighton,*298 AD2d 774 [2002]; *People v Harrison,*227 AD2d 722 [1996]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 3.47  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.47   | 7.09   | 10.22  | 6.53   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Martinez16

03/30/2016

601 EAL (2015)

16

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 73