alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011136EN.01008501.xml

| 24.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 136/85 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 136/85

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/300/CFSP

of 23 May 2011

implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

| (2) | In view of the gravity of the situation in Libya, an additional person and an additional entity should be included in the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annexes II and IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the gravity of the situation in Libya, an additional person and an additional entity should be included in the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annexes II and IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   The person listed in Annex I to this Decision shall be added to the lists set out in Annexes II and IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

2.   The entity listed in Annex II to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 May 2011.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

1

---

ANNEX I

PERSON REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1(1)

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Colonel Taher Juwadi | Fourth in Revolutionary Guard chain of command | Key Member of the Qadhafi regime. | 23.05.2011 |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

1.

Colonel Taher Juwadi

Fourth in Revolutionary Guard chain of command

Key Member of the Qadhafi regime.

23.05.2011

---

ANNEX II

ENTITY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1(2)

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Afriqiyah Airways | Afriqiyah Airways |
| 1st Floor |
| Waha Building |
| 273, Omar Almokhtar Street |
| P.O.Box 83428 |
| Tripoli, Libya |
| email address: afriqiyah@afriqiyah.aero |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

1.

Afriqiyah Airways

Afriqiyah Airways

1st Floor

Waha Building

273, Omar Almokhtar Street

P.O.Box 83428

Tripoli, Libya

email address: afriqiyah@afriqiyah.aero

Libyan subsidiary of/owned by the Libyan African Investment Portfolio, an entity owned and controlled by the regime and designated by the EU regulation.

23.05.2011

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 15-7



August 14, 2003

Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
Detroit, Michigan

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company for the three-month and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated
August 14, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-63370 on Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan
2017-0349.

#### State v. Milner.

Erie App. No. E-14-113.
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5965 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5965

**Commission Decision of 14/10/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5965 - BROOKFIELD / PRIME) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 14.10.2010

SG-Greffe (2010) D/16125

C(2010) 7202

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party: Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5965 - BROOKFIELD/ PRIME Notification of 14.09.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 254, 22.09.2010, p. 5.

(1) On 14.09.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Brookfield Asset Management Inc. ("Brookfield", Canada) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Prime Infrastructure Group ("Prime", Australia), by way of purchase of securities.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Brookfield: investment in property, renewable power and infrastructure assets;

- for Prime: management of an international portfolio of infrastructure assets, mainly in distribution and transmission of energy and transport..

4. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
# Distribution’s Champine receives commander’s coin

/ Published March 29, 2019
New Cumberland, Pa., 
DLA Distribution Organizational Management’s Navy Lt.  Justin Champine received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 26.

Champine volunteered his time on numerous occasions to act as the financial liability officer. He conducted eight different investigations at four different sites.  His meticulous, mission-focused approach while conducting property investigations assists in achieving increased audit-compliance across DLA Distribution.

When Champine was not conducting the investigations himself, he coordinated with Distribution’s Future Plans directorate to bring in high-quality reserve officers to conduct and complete 13 additional investigations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy Johnson, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 400]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy K. Webber, J.), rendered August 2, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). Although the principal witness’s testimony was undisputedly self-contradictory, the jury had a rational basis upon which to credit the version of the events provided on direct examination while discrediting the version provided on cross- and redirect examination *(see People v Fratello,*92 NY2d 565, 573-575 [1998], *cert denied*526 US 1068 [1999]). The fact that the jury acquitted defendant of murder does not warrant a different conclusion *(see People v Rayam,*94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

The court providently permitted the People to impeach the witness with his grand jury testimony, because his trial testimony on cross- and redirect examination was not merely unhelpful or limited to inability to recall, but was affirmatively damaging to the People’s case *(see*CPL 60.35 [1]; *People v Winchell,*98 AD2d 838, 841 [1983], *affd*64 NY2d 826 [1985]). Furthermore, when viewed in context, the prosecutor’s summation comments did not treat the grand jury testimony as evidence in chief. Defendant’s challenge to the content of the court’s instructions regarding the grand jury testimony is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, although the standard CJI charge is preferable, the instructions here provide no basis for reversal *(see*CPL 60.35 [2]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31

                         RULE 13a-14(a) Certification

I, Ralph Dickenson, certify that:

	1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Kingsley
Coach, Inc.;

	2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

	3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

	a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

	b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of ths disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

	c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

	5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

        a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: February 28, 2005             /s/ Ralph Dickenson
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Ralph Dickenson, Chief Executive Officer
                                     and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      241
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          5,515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,281
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,218)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   713
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (91)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (91)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:November 7, 2008 | By: /s/ Alexander Y. Tokman   Alexander Y. Tokman 
 Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: The Finance Committee of the Legal Services Corporation 
Board of Directors will meet on June 12, 1998. The meeting will begin 
at 1:00 p.m. and continue until conclusion of the committee's agenda.

LOCATION: Legal Services Corporation, 750 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20002.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Approval of minutes of the committee meeting of April 5, 1998.
    3. Review projection of expenses for the remainder of FY ``98, 
including internal budgetary adjustments, and act on the President's 
recommendations for consolidated operating budget reallocations.
    4. Testimony regarding budgetary needs for FY 2000.
    5. Consider and act on other business.
    6. Public comment.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel and 
Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 336-8810.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify the Office of the General Counsel at (202) 336-
8810.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-14564 Filed 5-28-98; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Gantt, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 624]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered September 16, 2011, as amended October 3, 2011 unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and Webber, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2047

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that receipt of additional

disability compensation for dependents not depend upon the waiver of

receipt of an equal amount of retired or retirement pay.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26 (legislative day, APRIL 11), 1994

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

receipt of additional disability compensation for dependents not depend upon the waiver of receipt of an equal

amount of retired or retirement pay.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONCURRENT AWARD OF ADDITIONAL DIS4 ABILITY COMPENSATION FOR DEPENDENTS

5 AND RETIRED PAY.

6 (a) CONCURRENT AWARD.—Section 5305 of title 38,

7 United States Code, is amended—
2

•S 2047 IS

1 (1) by striking out ‘‘Any person’’ and inserting

2 in lieu thereof ‘‘(a) Except as provided in subsection

3 (b), any person’’; and

4 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub5 section:

6 ‘‘(b) The requirement under subsection (a) of this

7 section that a person receiving compensation under the

8 laws administrated by the Secretary waive receipt of re9 tired or retirement pay in an amount equal to such com10 pensation shall not apply to receipt by the person of addi11 tional compensation for dependents under section 1115 or

12 1134 of this title.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact15 ment of this Act. No person shall be entitled to receive

16 by reason of the amendments made by subsection (a) any

17 benefits for any period before such date.

Æ
No. 12-8155.

#### Nelson *v.*Crews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-0444.

#### State v. Worley.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103105, 2017-Ohio-649.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>                   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                           EXTRACTED FROM ANR PIPELINE COMPANY FORM 10-Q
                           QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
                           AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                           FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                               36
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       326
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                          30
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    392
<PP&E>                                                            3,309
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    2,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    1,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               265
<BONDS>                                                             506
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          646
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      1,726
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    219
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      95
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  60
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0
        

</TABLE>
2017-0151.

#### State v. Green.

Trumbull App. No. 2016-T-0101, 2017-Ohio-160.
No. 12-8722.

#### Duc Huu Pham *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.