alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2017-0413.

#### State ex rel. Silver v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-864, 2017-Ohio-445. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Dean Michael Steffy, Deceased. Delcy L. Steffy, Appellant; Diane Mammolito, Respondent

[50 NYS3d 333]

Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Nora S. Anderson, S.), entered on or about January 16, 2016, which granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no triable issue of fact as to whether the change-of-beneficiary form signed by decedent on or about June 7, 2002 was effective. He followed “the method prescribed by the insurance contract” *(McCarthy v Aetna Life Ins. Co.,*92 NY2d 436, *579440 [1998]) by sending written notice in a form satisfactory to nonparty TIAA-CREF at its home office in New York, New York. It is true that the change-of-beneficiary form said, “This Designation of Beneficiary is effective for each annuity contract listed by number on it if the Designation is in form satisfactory to TIAA-CREF and if it is recorded by TIAA-CREF for that contract,” and that decedent failed to fill in the TIAA and CREF annuity numbers. However, at her deposition, TIAA-CREF’s representative explained that if a policyholder — like decedent in 2002 — had only one contract set (comprised of a TIAA number and a CREF number), the change of beneficiary had to apply to that contract set. She also explained that, at some point before 2002, TIAA-CREF’s policy changed. Before, TIAA-CREF would follow up with a policyholder who failed to fill in the TIAA-CREF annuity numbers even if he/she had only one contract set. After the change, TIAA-CREF no longer followed up if a policyholder had only one contract set.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.R, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Basem Altam, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 832]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered July 28, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan    | Feb   | Mar    | Apr    | May   | Jun   | Jul   | Aug    | Sep   | Oct    | Nov    | Dec   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ----- | ------ | ------ | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020                                                                                                                              | 2,897  | 6,627 | 7,138  |        |       |       |       |        |       | 3,299  |        |       
|2021                                                                                                                              |        | 3,827 | 7,278  | 3,664  | 7,171 |       |       | 3,306  |       |        |        | 9,763 
|2022                                                                                                                              | 14,262 | 3,675 | 14,330 | 11,384 | 7,333 | 3,677 |       |        |       |        |        |       
|2023                                                                                                                              |        |       | 8,486  | 11,006 | 7,625 | 7,290 | 3,489 | 10,292 | 3,311 | 18,258 | 10,221 | 14,383
|2024                                                                                                                              | 6,425  | 8,006 | 3,130  |        | 2,135 |       |       |        |       |        |        |       
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
1994-0010.

#### State v. Carter.

Hamilton App. No. C920604. On appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Motion granted. Cedric Carter’s sentence shall be carried into execution by the warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, or in his absence, by the deputy warden, on Wednesday, August 24, 2022, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

O’Neill, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in *State v. Wogenstahl,*134 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2013-Ohio-164, 981 N.E.2d 900.
#### Com. v. Davis

08/17/2016

171 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 773
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6873

KENNETH H. NEWKIRK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LOUIS LERNER, Judge, Circuit Court; ANTON BELL, District 

Attorney; GEORGE ROGERS, Attorney, Stand By; LINDA SMITH, 

Clerk of Circuit Court; CHARLES HADEN, Appeal Lawyer; 

RODNEY, Detective, Hampton Police Department; ASHLEY KELLY, 

Daily Press Writer; MONAE DEBRA WATERS-OWENS; THOMAS SHERRAD 

KEARNEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate

Judge. (3:12-cv-00410-HEH)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth H. Newkirk seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s order directing him to particularize his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2006) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Newkirk seeks to appeal 

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6102-5]


Changes to the May 8, 1998 Federal Register Notice Regarding Salt 
River Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Tentative Approval; Address 
Correction to Public Hearing Location; Date Changes to Public Hearing 
and Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA's tentative approval of an alternative liner system design 
and use of an alternative daily cover material for the Salt River 
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill was published in the May 8, 1998, 
Federal Register (63 FR 25476-25479). The following information is an 
update to the May 8, 1998, Federal Register document.
    Address Correction: the address for the public hearing was 
incorrect and printed as 1005 E. Osborne Road. The correct address is 
10005 Osborne Road.
    Public Hearing Date: has been rescheduled from June 10, 1998, to 
July 29, 1998.
    Public Comment Period: has been extended from June 10, 1998, to 
August 5, 1998.
    Please note that public hearing is scheduled for July 29, 1998, 
from 5-7 pm at Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation, Community 
Development Conference Room, 10005 E. Osborne Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 
85256. For further information, contact Steve Parker at (602) 850-8024. 
At the hearing, EPA may limit oral testimony to five minutes per 
speaker, depending on the number of commentors. The hearing may adjourn 
earlier than 7:00 pm if all of the speakers deliver their comments 
before that hour. Representatives of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa 
Indian Community and the Salt River MSWLF will be present at the public 
hearing.
    Copies of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's 
applications for site-specific flexibility are available for inspection 
and copying at: Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Reservation 
Administration Building, 10005 E. Osborne Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 
85256. Contact: Lonita Jim, Tribal Secretary (602) 850-8000, or the US 
EPA Region 9 Library, 75 Hawthorne Street 13th Floor, San Francisco, 
California, 94105, telephone (415) 744-1510, from 9 am to 5 pm Monday 
through Friday.
    All comments on the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community's 
applications for approval of site-specific flexibility must be received 
by August 5, 1998. Written comments should be sent to Ms. Susanna 
Trujillo, Mail Code WST-7, US EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105.

    Dated: May 15, 1998.
Lawrence J. Bowerman,
Acting Director, Waste Management Division.
[FR Doc. 98-13991 Filed 5-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -----
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 10.19
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert
Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Report.

|                                                     |  |                           
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                             |  | Dated:
  November 14, 2005
|                                                     |  |                           
|Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                 |  |                           
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                           
|(principal financial and
  accounting officer)       |  |                           

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert
Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

May 14, 2009

 

 

|        | /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Venerando J. Indelicato

Principal Financial Officer |

 

 

25
*January 9, 2018*

2018-Ohio-48.]

2017-0743.

#### Eastland Manor Apartments, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-537. On joint motion to remand. Cause remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals to take further action as appropriate.
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                             
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W   |     |     | W   |     |     |     | W   |    
|2021                                                                                                                              | W   |     | W   |     | W   |     | W   | W   |     |     | W   |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W  
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

I, Rose Frawert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: January 10, 2004
/s/ Rose Frawert
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



                                       13