alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.66   | W      | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
p.1 

OAR Box 1772 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

32) IV-E-7 

Docket Number: 

A-86-03 

Printed 12/2/2008 9:45:11 AM Sheet 32 of 117 
y

iDsx 

P.2 

^-^-o-i-K-e-^/ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR MICHIGA N 48105 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MAR 2 2 1990 3\9* 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Contacts With Pacific Resources and Congressman 

Blaz's Office 

FROM: 

TO: 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Docket A-86-03 

I was recently contacted by Pacific Resources and by staff 

from the office of Congressman Blaz with information related to 

the need to implement sulfur control for Hawaii and the Pacific 

Territories. Pacific Resources, which operates a refinery in 

Hawaii, argued that the amount of on-highway fuel used was 

insufficient to justify the cost of producing low-sulfur fuel 

for Hawaii. Of 12,000 barrels per day (BPD) total diesel fuel 

produced at the Pacific Resources refinery, only 2,000 BPD is 

used for on-highway vehicles. The staff from the office of 

Congressman Blaz indicated that Guam, which the Congressman 

represents, imports all of its diesel fuel from Singapore and 

will not be able to procure low-sulfur fuel from that source in 

the future. Guam uses about 890,000 barrels per year of diesel 

fuel, but the Congressman's staff did not know what fraction of 

that amount was for on-highway use. I explained to both 

contacts our concern with proposed Clean Air Act amendments 

exempting Hawaii and the Pacific territories from diesel fuel 

sulfur control because of the potential for adverse affects on 

emission control hardware expected to be used on 1994 and later 

heavy-duty diesel engines. 

8421W
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 23.1(b)




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-41847) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-35284) on Form
S-3 of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc. (formerly International Sports
Wagering Inc.) of our report dated November 8, 2001, except for the last
paragraph of Note 3 as to which the date is December 4, 2001, with respect to
the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended September 30, 2001.


Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP



New York, New York
December 18, 2001
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Bandi, Appellant, *v.*Ashe.

*235Argued March 26, 1951.

Before Drew, C. J., Stern, Stearns, Jones, Bell, Ladner and Chidsey, JJ.

*239*Edward T. Tait,*with him *Kountz, Fry <& Meyer,*for appellant.

*Owen B. McManus,*Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

April 17, 1951:

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Order affirmed on the able opinion of . President Judge Patterson of the learned court below.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\ Glenn M. Dobbs                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn M. Dobbs                         |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| November 8, 2007                       |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Order filed December 22, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00787

- CV

____________ KENNARD LAW, PC , Appellant

V.

JUDITH CLIFFORD , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 2020

- 01737



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a n order signed October 27, 2020. The notice of appeal was due November 17, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however,
filed the noti ce of appeal on November 19, 2020, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 61 5, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied,2

appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v. Green pa rk Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>                 THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED FROM ANR PIPELINE COMPANY FORM 10-Q
                         QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,
                         2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
                         TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       256
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                          28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    304
<PP&E>                                            3,465
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               197
<BONDS>                                             498
<COMMON>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                          784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,739
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    185
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        97
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      76
<INCOME-TAX>                                         28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  48
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         48
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
No. 12-8063.

#### Murray *v.*John D. Dingle Veterans Hospital Medical Center et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen,
Justices 

# Order

January 24, 2017

153952

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153952 COA: 327971 Kent CC: 14

- 006374

- FC HORACE DEMARIO COLLINS, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). We further ORDER the Kent Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order

2003

- 03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint the State Appellate Defender Offi ce to represent the defendant in this Court.

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel addressing whether a defendant who was sentenced prior to People v Lockridge , 498 Mich 358 (2015 ), sufficiently waived his constitutional rights to notice and jury proof beyond a reasonable doubt of facts used to score offense variables under

MCL 777.1 et seq ., where those facts were not charged in an indictment or information, but where he pleaded g uilty or no contest and stipulated under oath to the aggravating facts in the context of a general waiver of his jury trial rights. Compare Apprendi v New Jersey , 530 US 466, 476; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000) (stating that “ ‘under

the Due Proces s Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the notice and jury trial guarantees of the Sixth Amendment, any fact (other than prior conviction) that increases the maximum penalty for a crime must be charged in an indictment , submitted to a jury, and proven beyond a reasonable doubt’ ”) (emphasis added), quoting Jones v United States

, 526 US 227, 243 n 6; 119 S Ct 1215; 143 L Ed 2d 311 (1999), with United States v

Booker , 543 US 220, 244; 125 S Ct 738; 160 L Ed 2d 621 (2005) (stating that “we reaffirm our holding in Apprendi : A ny fact ( other than a prior conviction ) which is necessary to support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the factsI, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2017

s0117 2

Clerk established by a plea of guilty or a jury verdict must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt ”) (emphasis added). See also United States v Yancy , 725 F3d 596 (CA 6, 2013).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1868

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the casualty loss

deduction for disaster losses without regard to the 10-percent adjusted

gross income floor.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the

casualty loss deduction for disaster losses without regard

to the 10-percent adjusted gross income floor.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF 10-PERCENT FLOOR FOR DIS4 ASTER LOSSES.

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subparagraph (A) of section

6 165(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

7 to net casualty loss allowed only to the extent it exceeds

8 10 percent of adjusted gross income) is amended by strik9 ing clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following:
2

S 1868 IS

1 ‘‘(i) the amount of the personal cas2 ualty gains for the taxable year,

3 ‘‘(ii) the amount of the federally de4 clared disaster losses for the taxable year

5 (or, if lesser, the net casualty loss), plus

6 ‘‘(iii) the portion of the net casualty

7 loss which is not deductible under clause

8 (ii) but only to the extent such portion ex9 ceeds 10 percent of the adjusted gross in10 come of the individual.

11 For purposes of the preceding sentence the

12 term ‘net casualty loss’ means the excess of

13 personal casualty losses for the taxable year

14 over personal casualty gains.’’

15 (b) FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER LOSS DE16 FINED.—Paragraph (3) of section 165(h) of such Code is

17 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara18 graph:

19 ‘‘(C) FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER

20 LOSS.—The term ‘federally declared disaster

21 loss’ means any personal casualty loss attrib22 utable to a disaster occuring in an area subse23 quently determined by the President of the

24 United States to warrant assistance by the Fed-
3

S 1868 IS

1 eral Government under the Disaster Relief and

2 Emergency Assistance Act.’’

3 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading for para4 graph (2) of section 165(h) of such Code is amended by

5 striking ‘‘NET CASUALTY LOSS’’ and inserting ‘‘NET

6 NONDISASTER CASUALTY LOSS’’.

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to losses attributable to disasters

9 occurring on or after January 17, 1994, including for pur10 poses of determining the portion of such losses allowable

11 in taxable years ending before such date pursuant to an

12 election under section 165(i) of the Internal Revenue Code

13 of 1986.

Æ
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 10.12  | 10.40  | 10.39  | 10.39 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10.39  | 10.39  | 10.48  | 10.39  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian Howard, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 749]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court, dated September 11, 2000 *(People v Howard,*275 AD2d 721 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered September 28, 1998, on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issue of whether his convictions of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree were supported by legally sufficient evidence; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application: Joshua Siegel, Esq. 15 Gray Rock Avenue, Hartsdale, New York, 10530; and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall prosecute the application expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 *et*seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim. S. Miller, J.P., Friedmann, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
No. 12-8214.

#### Birdette *v.*Asset Acceptance, LLC, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
No. 12-599.

#### Carter *v.*Thompson, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7860.

#### Jenkins *v.*Alabama.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
      23.1








INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
      Rim
      Semiconductor Company on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-68716 and 333-102900) of our
      report dated February 1, 2007 **,** with
      respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Rim
      Semiconductor Company and Subsidiaries as of October 31, 2006 and 2005 and
      for
      the years then ended appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Rim
      Semiconductor Company for the year ended October 31, 2006.








/s/
      MARCUM & KLIEGMAN LLP


Marcum
      & Kliegman LLP








New
      York,
      New York


February
      1, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>  	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 	3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  	SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END> 	DEC-31-1995
<CASH>	6,561
<SECURITIES>	196,067
<RECEIVABLES>  	687,563
<ALLOWANCES>	8,089
<INVENTORY>	0
<CURRENT-ASSETS> 	0
<PP&E>  	16,800
<DEPRECIATION>	8,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 	1,084,743
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>  	0
<BONDS>  	214,396
<COMMON> 	293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>  	0
<PREFERRED> 	21,625
<OTHER-SE>	18,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  	1,084,743
<SALES> 	0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	34,057
<CGS>	0
<TOTAL-COSTS>	28,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES> 	0
<LOSS-PROVISION>  	934
<INTEREST-EXPENSE> 	3,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>	484
<INCOME-TAX>	171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>  	313
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>  	0
<CHANGES>  	0
<NET-INCOME>	303
<EPS-PRIMARY> 	(4,770.00)
<EPS-DILUTED> 	(4,770.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kathleen B. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KATHLEEN B. ALLEN*                                   
|Kathleen B. Allen Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May 13, 2003



*A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.