alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 7.13   | 10.19  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
DENY; and Opinion Filed December 1, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-01414-CV

IN RE TERRENCE M. GORE, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-12707-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Myers

This original proceeding arises from a contempt proceeding based on relator’s failure to 

pay child support. Relator first filed this proceeding seeking a petition for writ of habeas corpus, 

but then amended his pleading to seek mandamus relief. The issues presented in both realtor’s 

petition for writ of habeas corpus and petition for writ of mandamus are identical. Although 

relator states the trial court has issued a capias warrant for his arrest, it does not appear relator is 

incarcerated.

On numerous prior occasions we have addressed and rejected the complaints relator 

raises in both the petition for writ of mandamus and the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See In 

re Gore, 454 S.W.3d 711, 711 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2015) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ 

of mandamus asserting virtually identical complaints); In re Gore, 05-14-01422-CV, 2014 WL 

6466845, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 19, 2014, orig. proceeding), (mem. op.) (denying 

petition for writ of habeas corpus because record failed to include proof relator was actually 
–2–

restrained); In re Gore, No. 05-14-00103-CV, 2014 WL 476784, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 

5, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying virtually identical petition for writ of 

mandamus); In re Gore, No. 05-13-00364-CV, 2013 WL 1274740, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

Mar. 20, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ of mandamus raising 

many of same issues). We do not revisit those issues here. We DENY the petition. 

151414F.P05

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
No. 12-8147.

#### Laudermill *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
*January 11, 2018*

2018-Ohio-80.]

2017-1315.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Deters.

On respondent’s motion to purge contempt. Motion granted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1967 MICHAEL E. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee, and WILLIAM T. ESREY, CCEO; JIM KISSINGER, VP; RONALD E. GIER, VP; NESA RAE HELM; STEPHANIE BLAINE; NANCY PELFRESNE; CYNTHIA FISHER; LYNN SMICHK, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-1239-A) Submitted: January 21, 2004 Decided: February 10, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael E. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Frederick Walters, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael E. Harris appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Sprint United Management, Inc., in this action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. Sprint United Management, Inc. , No. CA-02-1239-A (E.D. Va. filed June 19, 2003 & entered June 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *result of operations of the
Trust.

Date: November 13, 2003
      -----------------

/s/  Joel Faden                           /s/  Marcia Markowski
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.    Marcia Markowski
Chief financial individual providing      Trust officer of The Corporate Trustee
accounting services


* The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in financial
statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The Trust is required
to distribute all funds received after payment of expenses. Accordingly, the
Trust has not prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
Inside Acquisition: How the Marine Corps plans to double the MTVR’s lifespan
 
  By Ashley Calingo, PEO Land Systems Public Affairs
                                   Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Marine Corps Systems Command website.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of El Paso, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 7.87
|2023                                                                                                                              |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Cartagena

09/15/2015

203 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1057
No. 12-832.

#### Catsiff *v.*McCarty et al.

Ct. App. Wash. Certiorari denied.
CAAP-13-0000703

#### Wong v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

Affirmed
# L_2012188DE.01001901.xml

| 18.7.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 188/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 188/19

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 407/2010 des Rates vom 11. Mai 2010 zur Einführung eines europäischen Finanzstabilisierungsmechanismus

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 118 vom 12. Mai 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 118 vom 12. Mai 2010

Auf Seite 1, Erwägungsgrund 4:

anstatt:

„Die Verschärfung der Finanzkrise hat für mehrere Mitgliedstaaten des Eurogebiets zu einer gravierenden Verschlechterung der Kreditkonditionen geführt, die darüber hinausgeht, was sich durch wirtschaftliche Fundamentaldaten erklären ließe. Wird in dieser Situation nicht umgehend gehandelt, könnten Stabilität, Einheit und Integrität der Europäischen Union insgesamt ernsthaft bedroht sein.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Verschärfung der Finanzkrise hat für mehrere Mitgliedstaaten zu einer gravierenden Verschlechterung der Kreditkonditionen geführt, die darüber hinausgeht, was sich durch wirtschaftliche Fundamentaldaten erklären ließe. Wird in dieser Situation nicht umgehend gehandelt, könnte die Finanzstabilität der Europäischen Union insgesamt ernsthaft bedroht sein.“

---
495 P.2d 1349

#### Richard RUTT, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Bob Campbell, Inc., Respondent Employer, Continental Casualty Company (CNA/lnsurance), Respondent Carrier.

No. 1 CA-IC 615.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

April 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1972.

Review Denied July 13, 1972.

Langerman, Begam & Lewis, P. A., by Jack Levine, Phoenix, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, by Jon L. Kyi, Phoenix, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.

STEVENS, Presiding Judge.

This is a review of an award of The Industrial Commission of Arizona which adopted a decision of the hearing officer. The award in question allowed certain accident benefits as, well as certain compensation benefits to Richard Rutt, the injured employee, herein referred tj> as the petitioner. The petitioner urges that he should, have received additional compensation.

Prior to the injury of March 1969 the petitioner, unbeknown to him, had a low back degenerative disc disease. He sustained an industrially related temporary aggravation thereof in March, 1969. There was medical evidence that the effect of the aggravation by the industrial incident had terminated and that the petitioner’s progressive degenerative back problems, unrelated to the industrial incident, rendered him susceptible to reinjury of his back. It was recommended that he not return to his former heavy physical labor in the construction industry due to his susceptibility to reinjury.

Our examination of the record discloses that several issues were resolved in favor of the petitioner. These have not been attacked before this Court. From our examination we conclude that the award in question is sustained by the evidence, and we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the award.

The award is affirmed.

CASE and DONOFRIO, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                                                           
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jerry Wong, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

June 28, 2011

 
| /s/ Jerry Wong          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jerry Wong              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1918 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1918

       To suspend temporarily the duty on crosscarmellose sodium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 10 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

    Mr. Roth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on crosscarmellose sodium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:
    

       ``  9902.31.12   Crosscarmellose sodium (CAS              No change      No change      On or before     
                         No. 9004-32-4) (provided for                                           12/31/98      ''
                         in subheading 3912.39.00)...  Free                                                    .

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Com. v. Harvey

03/30/2016

817 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 450
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Singapore (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Singapore (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 5.63   | 5.25  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.30   | 6.49   | 14.95  | 6.68   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0469.

#### Chagrin Realty, Inc. v. Testa.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2011-2523. On responses to show-cause order. Appellant/cross-appellee has shown cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. On appellant/cross-appellee’s motion to supplement record. Motion granted.

O’Connor, C.J., and DeWine, J., dissent.
Exhibit
32.2
 Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 I, Bryn
Harman, Chief Financial Officer of HuntMountain Resources Ltd., certify
that:
 
 1.           This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HuntMountain Resources Ltd. fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain
Resources Ltd..
   Date:
      August 14, 2008/s/ Bryn Harman, CFABryn
      Harman, Chief Financial Officer
#### McElwain, Appellant, *v.*Myers.

*347Argued March 21, 1951.

Before Drew, C. J., Stern, Stearne, Jones, Bell, Ladner and Chidsey, JJ.

*350
      *Samuel J. Feigus,*with him *Wade K. Newell,*for appellant.

*William B. Parshall,*with him *Henderson, Parshall & Crow,*for appellee.

May 23,1951:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A majority of the members of this Court who heard this case are of the opinion that the learned court below was correct in refusing to take off the nonsuit. The *351judgment is therefore affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Care for the court *en*banc.

Judgment affirmed.