alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1683 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1683

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds to the 
  Palisades Interstate Park Commission for acquisition of land in the 
 Sterling Forest area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 18 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

 Mr. Bradley (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds to the 
  Palisades Interstate Park Commission for acquisition of land in the 
 Sterling Forest area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sterling Forest and New Jersey 
Watershed Protection Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. LAND ACQUISITION.

    (a) Authorization.--The Palisades Park Commission (referred to in 
this Act as the ``Commission'') is authorized to acquire from the 
Sterling Forest Corporation an open space tract of land comprising the 
Sterling Forest area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region.
    (b) Management.--The Commission shall manage the land acquired 
pursuant to subsection (a) to enhance protection of watershed, outdoor 
recreational, wildlife habitat, and Appalachian Trail values in the 
Sterling Forest area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary of the Interior $35,000,000 for the purposes of acquiring the 
land described in section 2.
    (b) Transfer of Funds.--Of the sums made available pursuant to 
subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior shall transfer to the 
Commission such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 2,320 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1,829  | 130    | 1,441  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0736.

#### Value Place Columbus OH N.W., L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-292. On joint motion to remand appeal to the Franklin County Board of Revision. Motion granted.
Kruger, Brett (OST)
From: Sent: To: Subject: Dan Thomas <dthomas@japanvp.com> Monday, August 20, 2012 11:08 AM Rosenberg, Esta (OST); Kruger, Brett (OST)

. Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018 DL Request to Shift Service

### Ha~ci1 te!Vkelfr.o(),:bTW to SEA

DearMs. Rosenberg and Mr. Kruger, I am writing in response to the recent notification issued bythe DOT regarding the Motion ofDelta Airlines in in the matter of2010 U.S.-Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding. By way ofbackground, 

### I am a frequent traveler between the United States and Japan having flown over 

### 2 million actual miles on Delta and its predecessor NWA and over 1 million miles on United Airlines. I currently reside in Seattle. I am not in any way affiliated with any ofthe carriers. I would like to make the following points with respect to this proceeding. 1) Ultimately the goal ofthis proceeding is to benefit the public and therefore I believe it is important that the DOT give adequate consideration to the opinions ofthe actual flying public. Heretofore, I believe communication to and opinions received bythe DOThave been predominantly from the carriers. 2) Air trafficbetween Japan and the U.S. has been dominated by a small number ofcarriers, which has resulted in disproportionately higherfares than on otherroutes. This has been exacerbated bythe mergers ofDLI NWA and UA/CO. Allowing additional carriers to operate betweenJapan and the U.S. would help to ameliorate this problem and should be considered by the DOT. 3) DLhas alreadybeen given the opportunity to operate additional flights between the U.S. and Japan and has failed to do so on a consistent basis. 4) Since its merger with NWA, DLhas de-emphasized the importance ofits Japanese operations and its commitmentto Japan bound passengers. A cursory review ofvarious social media sites will show that there is extreme dissatisfaction with DL among frequent international flyers. 5) TheJapan-Seattle market is adequately served. NHhas recently added an additional flight between NRT and SEA. 6) 

### It should be obvious that DL's intention ifthey get this route is either a) to cancel its existing to NRT-SEA route or it's NRT-PDXroute. IfDL is awarded this route, it should onlybe with a pre-condition that they not suspend or cancel any existing routes betweenJapan and SEA orPDX for a period of5 years. 7) In making it's decision, the DOT should give primary emphasis to a) increasing on competition onroutes already served where there is limited competition (e.g. BOS, DTW, MSP), b) providing service to cities not currently served, or c) allowing carriers not currently serving the Japan market to do so. Thank you for your consideration. DanThomas

1
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I

#### State v. Canosa

CAAP-11-0001051

02/07/2014

Vacated and Remanded
No. 12-96.

#### Shelby County, Alabama *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*
      *1152p. 1006.] Motion of respondents Bobby Pierson et al. for divided argument granted.
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) 

P-03-840 

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 25
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMN P-03-840 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMN P-03-840 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMN P-03-840 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 25
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-03-840 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 25
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 25
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 25
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-03-840 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 25
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-03-840 

EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 25
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 25
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 25
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 25
*January 30, 2018*

2018-Ohio-360.]

1998-1970.

#### State v. Tibbetts.

Hamilton C.P. No. B9708596. Pursuant to a warrant of reprieve issued by the governor and filed with this court on September 1, 2017, it was ordered that Raymond Tibbetts’s sentence be carried into execution on Tuesday, February 13, 2018. In order to facilitate this court’s timely consideration of any matters relating to the execution of appellant’s sentence, the chief justice may suspend application of any provisions of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court, including but not limited to the filing requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.02.

Service of documents as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.11 shall be personal, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.

Counsel of record for the parties shall provide this court with a copy of any document relating to this matter that is filed in or issued by any other court in this state or any federal court, as well as any commutation, pardon, or warrant of reprieve issued by the governor. A copy of the document shall be delivered to the office of the clerk as soon as possible, either personally, by facsimile transmission, or by e-mail.
2017-0189.

#### State v. Degenero.

Trumbull App. No. 2015-T-0104, 2016-Ohio-8514.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(A)

                         CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Core Molding Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James L. Simonton, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ James L. Simonton
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        James L. Simonton
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Director

                                        March 30, 2006


                                                                              65
exv10w1



 







EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE

TO THE KITTY HAWK

2003 LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN




          THIS AMENDMENT TO THE KITTY HAWK 2003 LONG TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (this “Amendment”),
dated as of May 23, 2006, is made and entered into by Kitty Hawk, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”). Terms used in this Amendment with initial capital letters that are not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Kitty Hawk 2003 Long Term
Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).




RECITALS




          WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Plan, pursuant to Amendment Number One to the Plan, provides that
the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under
the Plan is 7,000,000; and




          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) desires to amend the Plan to
increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be granted to Participants under
the Plan to 8,500,000; and




          WHEREAS, the Board submitted the proposal to amend the Plan as described above to the
Company’s stockholders at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders; and




          WHEREAS, the Company’s stockholders approved the proposal to amend the Plan;




          NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:





	1.	 	Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and
substituting in lieu thereof the following:





5.1      Number Available for Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Articles 11
and 12, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered
pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan is 8,500,000 shares; provided,
however, that the number of shares of Common Stock that may be awarded to
a Participant in a single year may not exceed 1,500,000. Shares to be issued may
be made available from authorized but unissued Common Stock, Common Stock held by
the Company in its treasury, or Common Stock purchased by the Company on the open
market or otherwise. During the term of this Plan, the Company will at all times
reserve and keep available the number of shares of Common Stock that shall be
sufficient to satisfy the requirements of this Plan.




	2.	 	Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with the provisions thereof.





* * * * *




 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date
first written above.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	KITTY HAWK, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Steven E. Markhoff
 	 
	 	Name:  	Steven E. Markhoff 	 	 
	 	Title:  	Vice President Strategic Planning,
 General
Counsel and Corporate 
Secretary
No. 12-8735.

#### Rodriguez, aka Luis, aka Rodriguez Secundino, aka Rodriguez Luis v. *United*States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Com. v. Goldblum 9

03/23/2016

480 WAL (2015)

9

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 469
#### In the Matter of Enrique G., Respondent, v Lisbet E., Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 533]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about December 15, 1999, which denied respondent mother’s motion to vacate an order of filiation adjudging petitioner to be the father of Crystal G., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court correctly denied respondent’s motion to vacate the order of filiation granted upon her default in appearing on the return date for the paternity petition. Respondent’s explanations for her absence from the proceedings were unsubstantiated and, as such, properly rejected by the court *(see Matter of Derrick T.,*261 AD2d 108, 109 [1999]). Moreover, even if respondent had a valid excuse for her absence, she provided no explanation for her failure to contact the court respecting her unavailability *(see Matter of Ashley Marie M.,*287 AD2d 333, 334 [2001]).

Even if the merits were to be reached, respondent would, notwithstanding blood tests excluding petitioner as the subject child’s biological father, be equitably estopped from challenging petitioner’s assertion of paternity. The evidence showed that it *289would be detrimental to the interests of the child, six years of age at the time of the Family Court proceedings, to countenance the disruption of her close relationship with petitioner, whom she has always known and loved as her father *(see Matter of Richard W. v Roberta Y.,*240 AD2d 812, 813-815 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 809 [1997]; *Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D.,*127 AD2d 6, 12 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.
No. 12-8160.

#### Eato *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Steiner, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

November 14, 2008

 

|        | /s/ Michael S. Steiner                       |  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--|
|   | Michael S. SteinerPrincipalExecutive Officer |

 

 

----
No. 12-6481.

#### Ford *v.*Mississippi.

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certio-rari denied.
steam_record - Re: RRI Energy Niles Power Plant Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/30/2010 09:41AM 

cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." 

<KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, 

<DIANE.R.MARTINI@Sargentlundy.com>, "Macey, Francis E" <fmacey@rrienergy.com>, 

"Cunningham, Allison" <ACunningham@rrienergy.com>, "Greek, Matt E." 

<MGreek@rrienergy.com>, "Brown, Steven W." <SwBrown@rrienergy.com>, "Senedak, Thomas 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Tondo, Rocco" <RTondo@rrienergy.com>

Date: 7/2/2010 7:18 PM

Subject: Re: RRI Energy Niles Power Plant Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E3B9ED... 3/21/2011
C." <TCSenedak@rrienergy.com> 

Subject: RRI Energy Niles Power Plant Request 

Dear Ms. Alicea,

Please see the attached request for a due date extension on the Steam Electric Questionnaire from the RRI 

Energy Niles power station. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Thank you,

Rocky Tondo

RRI Energy

General Manager

Niles Power Plant

1047 Belmont Ave

Niles, OH 44446

Office 330-505-4327

Cell 330-301-2788

[attachment "US EPA Niles Request.pdf" removed by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C2E3B9ED... 3/21/2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief financial officer of
Microvision, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

1)     the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    the information contained in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:May 9, 2008 | By: /s/ Jeff T. Wilson   Jeff T. Wilson
 Chief Financial Officer
|---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 8.09   | 12.32  | 6.80   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024