30020 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 105 /Tuesday, June 2, 1998 / Notices

Those wishing to attend the meeting

should contact Mr. George Like at the

Agency for International Development,

Ronald Reagan Building, Office of

Agriculture and Food Security, 1300

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Room 2.11–

072, Washington DC, 20523–2110,

telephone (202) 712–1436, fax (202)

216–3010 or internet[glike@usaid.gov]

with your full name.

Anyone wishing to obtain additional

information about BIFAD should

contact Mr. Tracy Atwood the

Designated Federal Officer for BIFAD.

Write him in care of the Agency for

International Development, Ronald

Reagan Building, Office of Agriculture

and Food Security, 1300 Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW, Room 2.11–005,

Washington DC, 20523–2110, telephone

him at (202) 712–5571 or fax (202) 216–

3010.

Tracy Atwood,

AID Designated Federal Officer (Deputy

Director, Office of Agriculture and Food

Security, Economic Growth Center, Bureau

for Global Programs).

[FR Doc. 98–14500 Filed 6–1–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Community Oriented Policing

Services; Agency Information

Collection Activities: Proposed

Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review; new collection.

COPS More ’96 28 CFR Part 23

Certification

The Department of Justice, Office of

Community Oriented Policing Services,

has submitted the following information

collection request to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB) for

review and clearance in accordance

with emergency review procedures of

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

OMB approval has been requested by

June 5, 1998. The proposed information

collection is published to obtain

comments from the public and affected

agencies. If granted, the emergency

approval is only valid for 180 days.

Comments should be directed to OMB,

Office of Information Regulation Affairs,

Attention: Mr. Alex Hunt, (202) 395–

7860, Department of Justice Desk

Officer, Washington, DC 20530.

During the first 60 days of this same

review period, a regular review of this

information collection is also being

undertaken. All comments and

suggestions, or questions regarding

additional information, to include

obtaining a copy of the proposed

information collection instrument with

instructions, should be directed to Nina

S. Pozgar, General Counsel, Office of

Community Oriented Policing Services,

1100 Vermont Avenue, Washington DC

20530, or facsimile at (202) 514–3456.

Request written comments and

suggestions from the public and affected

agencies concerning the proposed

collection of information. Your

comments should address one or more

of the following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Overview of this information.

(1) Type of Information Collection:

new collection.

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: COPS

More ’96 28 C.F.R. Part 23 Certification.

(3) Agency form number, if any, and

the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection:

COPS 25/01. Office of Community

Oriented Policy Services, U.S.

Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be as or

required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Primary: State, Local or Tribal

Government. Other: None. This

information collection is necessary to

establish that each grantee that has

received funding under the COPS

MORE ’96 grant program is either in

compliance with the operating

principles set forth in 28 C.F.R. Part

23.20 or that the regulation is not

applicable.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond/reply: The time burden of the

1,100 respondents to complete the

surveys is 5 hours and 10 minutes per

application.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: The total annual hour burden

to complete applications for the COPS

More ’96 28 C.F.R. Part 23 Certification

is 5,518 annual burden hours.

If additional information is required

contact: Mrs. Brenda E. Dyer, Deputy

Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice, Information

Management and Security Staff Justice

Management Division, Suite 850,

Washington Center, 1001 G Street N.W.,

Washington, DC 20530.

Dated: May 27, 1998.

Brenda E. Dyer,

Department Deputy Clearance Officer, United

States Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 98–14488 Filed 6–1–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–AT–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request Revision of a

Currently Approved Collection

ACTION: Notice of information collection;

revision of a currently approved

collection; Arrestee Drug Abuse

Monitoring (ADAM, formerly the Drug

Use Forecasting) Program.

The Department of Justice, Office of

Justice Programs, has submitted the

information collection request for

review and clearance in accordance

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995. The proposed information

collection is published to obtain

comments from the public and affected

agencies. Comments are encouraged and

will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until

August 3, 1998.

Written comments and suggestions

from the public and affected agencies

concerning the collection of information

should address one or more of the

following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have any

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of collection

of information on those who are to

respond, including through the use of

appropriate automated, electronic,

mechanical, or other technological

collection techniques or other forms of