alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1997
L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cv-00475-JRS) Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 18, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: L. Ruther appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. United States, 3:07-cv-00475-JRS (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 14, 2007; entered Sept. 17, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<MULTIPLIER>      1
   
       

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                            2,529  
<SECURITIES>                          0      
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,070,741      
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                       2,468
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,099,115
<PP&E>                          464,154           
<DEPRECIATION>                   94,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,646,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           780,880
<BONDS>                               0          
<COMMON>                        394,640       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0   
<OTHER-SE>                       97,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,646,970
<SALES>                       1,134,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,155,119
<CGS>                           394,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   608,785   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 13,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               57,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  80,371
<INCOME-TAX>                     26,721
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0

<PAGE>

<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     53,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .01

        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending May 28, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


National Advisory Council on Migrant Health; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
National Advisory body scheduled to meet during the month of May 1998:

    Name: National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.
    Date and Time: Wednesday, May 13, 1998 at 9:00 am to Thursday, 
May 14, 1998 at 5:00 pm.
    Place: Renaissance Houston Hotel, 6 Greenway Plaza East, 
Houston, TX 66046, 713/629-1200.
    The meeting is open to the public.
    Agenda: This will be a meeting of the Council. The agenda 
includes an overview of general Council business activities and 
priorities. Topics of discussion will include the State Children's 
Health Insurance Program, Worker Protection Standards, and the 
collaboration possibilities with other migrant health advocates 
organizations. In addition, the Council will review and discuss the 
1997 NACMH Recommendations.
    The Council meeting is being held in conjunction with the 
National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC), 1998 
National Farmworker Health Conference, May 15-18, 1998. Anyone 
requiring information regarding the subject Council should contact 
Susan Hagler, Migrant Health Program, staff support to the National 
Advisory Council on Migrant Health, Bureau of Primary Health Care, 
Health Resources and Services Administration, 4350 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Telephone 301/594-4302.
    Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities indicate.

    Dated: April 16, 1998.
Jane M. Harrison,
Acting Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-10656 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-U
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 

### 134920 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134920 COA: 278848 Genesee CC: 06-017930-FC FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT FULTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 13.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 20-F for the two-year period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Samuel See, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, ‘‘filed’’ with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 17, 2008


/s/ Samuel SeeSamuel See
Interim Chief Financial Officer


---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 4, 2005
    
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company
 .
EXHIBIT 23.2

[BDO SEIDMAN, LLP LETTERHEAD]

                             Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

TSI Soccer Corporation
Durham, North Carolina

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements of dELiA*s Inc.:

         (a) Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-43665),

         (b) Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-42135),

         (c) Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-22449) and

         (d) Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-61289)

of our report dated March 18, 1998, relating to the financial statements of TSI
Soccer Corporation, appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of dELiA*s Inc.
for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1999.

BDO Seidman, LLP

April 15, 1999
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1993

To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North Slope oil, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To remove the restrictions on the export of Alaskan North

Slope oil, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPORT ADMINISTRATION ACT AMENDMENT.

4 Section 7(d) of the Export Administration Act of

5 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2406(d)) is repealed.

6 SEC. 2. TRANSPORT REQUIREMENT.

7 The export of domestically produced crude oil shall

8 be transported in vessels documented under the laws of

9 the United States which are eligible to engage in the coast10 wise trade if such crude oil is transported by pipeline over
2

•S 1993 IS

1 right-of-way granted pursuant to section 203 of the

2 Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C.

3 1652).

4 SEC. 3. OTHER PROVISIONS OF LAW.

5 The export of domestically produced crude oil trans6 ported by pipeline over right-of-way granted pursuant to

7 section 203 of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization

8 Act (43 U.S.C. 1652) shall not be subject to the restric9 tions contained in section 28(u) of the Mineral Leasing

10 Act (30 U.S.C. 185(u)), section 103 of the Energy Policy

11 and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6212), section 28 of the

12 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1354), or

13 section 7430(e) of title 10, United States Code, or any

14 regulations issued under any such provision of law.

Æ
No. 12-7595.

#### Bynum *v.*Mississippi.

Sup. Ct. Miss. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-8370.

#### Robinson *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Com. v. Kingwood14

03/23/2016

624 EAL (2015)

14

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 83
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         199882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                199882
<CGS>                                            12270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                187620
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (8)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (8)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (8)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-7926.

#### Duboc *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5905 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5905

**Commission Decision of 01/07/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5905 - SACYR / EISER / AUNOR / TURIA / ITEMOSA / ITEPESA) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 1.7.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/9813/9814/9815

C(2010) 4647

PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5905 - SACYR / EISER / AUNOR / TURIA / ITEMOSA / ITEPESA Notification of 04.06.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 155, 15.06.2010, p.11

1. On 4 June 2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Eiser Infrastructure Ltd. ("Eiser", UK) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertakings Autovía del Noroeste Concesionaria, S.A. ("Aunor", Spain), Autovía del Turia Concesionaria de la Generalitat Valenciana, S.A. ("Turia", Spain), Intercambiador de Transportes Moncloa S.A. ("Itemosa", Spain) and Intercambiador de Transportes Plaza Elíptica, S.A. ("Itepesa", Spain), all four currently controlled by Sacyr Vallehermoso S.A. ("Sacyr", Spain), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking Sacyr: construction, maintenance and operation of public infrastructure concessions;

- for undertaking Eiser: investing into and managing infrastructure activities;

- for undertakings Aunor, Turia, Itemosa and Itepesa: maintenance and operation of a public infrastructure concession.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission,

(Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
#### Cheryl Delmonte, Appellant, v Kevin Tighe et al., Defendants, and Joanne Tighe, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 634]

*669In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated August 9, 2002, as granted the motion of the defendant Joanne Tighe for leave to reargue that branch of her prior motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for negligence, which was denied by order of the same court dated April 3, 2002, and upon reargument, granted that branch of the motion.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant Joanne Tighe (hereinafter the respondent) for leave to reargue *(see generally McGill v Goldman,*261 AD2d 593, 594 [1999]; CPLR 2221 [d]). Upon re-argument, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the respondent with respect to the negligence cause of action.

There are limited circumstances in which relief may be granted under a negligence theory of recovery, rather than strict liability, for injuries caused by an animal *(see St. Germain v Dutchess County Agric. Socy.,*274 AD2d 146, 149-150 [2000]; *Schwartz v Erpf Estate,*255 AD2d 35 [1999]). “[W]here the conduct at issue, although not vicious, results in reasonably-foreseeable injury, the courts have recognized a right to recover for common-law negligence” *(Colarusso v Dunne,*286 AD2d 37, 39 [2001]).

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the injury was not reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]), and, in opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]).

We note that the plaintiffs remaining contention is stricken from her brief by separate order of this Court. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.
#### Robert Duffy et al., Respondents, v 274 West 19, LLC, et al., Appellants. (And Third-Party Actions.)

[49 NYS3d 683]

*554Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered May 26, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff Robert Duffy allegedly struck his head while attempting to walk through a low door that led to a machine room in a building owned by defendant 274 West 19, LLC and managed by defendant Beach Lane Management, Inc.

Defendants made a prima facie showing that the alleged New York City Building Code violations did not apply to the building, which was erected in 1899, before the enactment of the Code *(see e.g. Vasquez v Soriano,*106 AD3d 545, 545 [1st Dept 2013]). Plaintiffs’ expert’s opinion that “[t]he door and exterior stair w[ere] clearly not of the original construction and would violate whatever code edition was in effect at the time [the door and stairs] had been installed,” was too conclusory and speculative to raise an issue of fact *(see Cummo v Children’s Hosp. of N.Y.,*113 AD3d 405, 406 [1st Dept 2014]).

Defendants are entitled to dismissal of plaintiff’s common-law claim, as plaintiff’s testimony established that the condition complained of was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous *(see Boyd v New York City Hous. Auth.,*105 AD3d 542, 543 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*22 NY3d 855 [2013]).

Concur — Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Sweetgrass, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Sweetgrass, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 2.30   | 1.59  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | 2.01   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024