alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Arkansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,265  | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1,096  | 1,122  | 1,087  | 1,142  | 960   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 951    | 909    | 809    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Pedro v. Bureau of Administrative Adjudication

03/30/2016

669 EAL (2015)

Denied

No. 282 CD 2015
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1653

For the relief of The Triax Company, a Utah corporation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 10 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of The Triax Company, a Utah corporation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED

4 STATES.

5 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

6 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap7 propriated, the sum of $2,800,000 to The Triax Company,

8 a Utah corporation.

9 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

10 shall be in full compensation of any claim of The Triax

11 Company against the United States arising out of a con12 tract at Memphis Naval Air Station, Millington, Ten-
2

•S 1653 IS

1 nessee, for the rehabilitation of 486 housing units of

2 Wherry Housing (Contract No. N62467-80-C-0099).

3 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY’S AND AGENT’S FEES.

4 Not more than 10 percent of the payment specified

5 in section 1 may be paid to or received by any agent or

6 attorney as consideration for any services rendered in con7 nection with this Act, notwithstanding any contract which

8 provides otherwise. Any person who violates this section

9 shall be fined not more than $50,000.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2026 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2026

    To amend the Panama Canal Act of 1979 to require the payment of 
  interest on certain damages awarded by the Panama Canal Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 19 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

 Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Panama Canal Act of 1979 to require the payment of 
  interest on certain damages awarded by the Panama Canal Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) section 1411 
of the Panama Canal Act of 1979 (22 U.S.C. 3771) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, including interest 
        under subsection (c),'' after ``damages''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) Damages which are adjusted and payable under subsection (a) 
shall include interest calculated from the date of filing of the claim 
to the date of payment. Such interest shall be computed at the rate the 
Secretary of the Treasury establishes for interest payments under 
section 12 of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (41 U.S.C. 611).''.
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be deemed to have 
become effective as of April 1, 1988.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. &
1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of Royal Standard
Minerals Inc., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
January 31, 2014, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal Standard Minerals Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.



|Dated: April 29, 2016   | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|/s/ Daniel Crandall     | 
|Daniel Crandall         | 
|Chief Financial Officer |
#### Com. v. Maines

09/06/2016

227 WAL (2016)

Denied
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2014

No. 04-14-00204-CR

Benito Aguilar GARZA, JR.,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-05-13044-CR

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On May 29, 2014, Appellant’s attorney filed a motion to withdraw his appeal “for the 

reason that no action is needed at this time.” We note the motion was signed by Appellant 

Benito Garza. Appellant’s motion, however, does not comply with Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2. Appellant is ordered to file a Motion to 

Dismiss in accordance with Rule 42.2, no later than June 20, 2014. Absent a motion to dismiss, 

this matter will remain on this court’s docket and all appellate deadlines will be enforced.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1804

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the disparity between

civilian and military retiree cost-of-living adjustments caused by the

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. WARNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the

disparity between civilian and military retiree cost-ofliving adjustments caused by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DISPARITY BETWEEN CIVIL4 IAN AND MILITARY RETIREE COST-OF-LIVING

5 ADJUSTMENTS.

6 Section 1401a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code,

7 (as added by section 2001 of the Omnibus Budget Rec-
2

S 1804 IS

1 onciliation Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–66), is amend2 ed—

3 (1) in the paragraph heading, strike out

4 ‘‘THROUGH 1998.—’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

5 ‘‘THROUGH 1996.—’’;

6 (2) in subparagraph (A)—

7 (A) by striking out the subparagraph head8 ing and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘FISCAL YEARS

9 1994 THROUGH 1996.—’’;

10 (B) by striking out ‘‘December 1, 1993,’’

11 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 1 of

12 1993, 1994, or 1995,’’; and

13 (C) by striking out ‘‘March 1994’’ and in14 serting in lieu thereof ‘‘March of the following

15 year’’;

16 (3) by striking out subparagraph (B); and

17 (4) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as sub18 paragraph (B), and in that subparagraph by striking

19 out ‘‘Subparagraphs (A) and (B) do’’ and inserting

20 in lieu thereof ‘‘Subparagraph (A) does’’.

Æ
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug   | Sep   | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ---
|2013                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 14.85 | 14.85 |       |     |    
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |       | 15.12 |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Police Week 2019 Spotlight: Officer Colton Kruse

/ Published May 16, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, **. Name:****How long have you been in law enforcement (all together and at DSCR)?****What made you decide to go into law enforcement and public service?****What is your most memorable event from your job as a police officer?****What is your greatest achievement on the job?****What’s the most rewarding thing about being a police officer?****Have you had any mentors in your career? If so, how have/did they help?****How do you define excellence (as related to being a Law Enforcement Officer)?****What makes for a great day on the job?****What would you say to someone to encourage them to go into public service?**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains first quarter summary financial information extracted
from Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal 1997 first quarter Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          12,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,293
<INVENTORY>                                     57,983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,854
<PP&E>                                         455,354
<DEPRECIATION>                                 284,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,393
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           229
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,159
<SALES>                                         91,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,388
<CGS>                                           63,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    93
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
# L_2011062EN.01003101.xml

| 9.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/31

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

of 3 February 2011

on the closure of the accounts of the European Police College for the financial year 2008

(2011/150/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

having regard to the accounts of the European Police College for the financial year 2008, in accordance with the information provided in the CEPOL Final Financial Statements for 2009, dated 5 July 2010,

having regard to the Court of Auditors’ report on the annual accounts of the European Police College for the financial year 2008, together with the College’s replies (1),

having regard to the Council’s recommendation of 16 February 2010 (5827/2010 — C7-0061/2010),

having regard to its decision of 5 May 2010 (2) postponing the discharge decision for the financial year 2008, and the replies from the Director of the European Police College,

having regard to its decision of 7 October 2010 (3) refusing to grant the Director of the European Police College discharge for the financial year 2008,

having regard to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (4), and in particular Article 185 thereof,

having regard to Council Decision 2005/681/JHA of 20 September 2005 establishing the European Police College (CEPOL) (5), and in particular Article 16 thereof,

having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (6), and in particular Article 94 thereof,

having regard to Rule 77 of, and Annex VI to, its Rules of Procedure, in particular the first subparagraph of Article 5(2)(b) of that Annex,

| 1. | Closes the accounts of the European Police College for the financial year 2008; |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Director of the European Police College, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The President

Jerzy BUZEK

The Secretary-General

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  
  OJ C 304, 15.12.2009, p. 124.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 252, 25.9.2010, p. 232.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 320, 7.12.2010, p. 11.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1.

4

(5)  
  OJ L 256, 1.10.2005, p. 63.

5

(6)  
  OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

6

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting.Date: March 12, 2004/s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMERDennis J. StevermerChief Financial Officer
Members of EPA’s Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery met with members of the Asphalt 

Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) on July 15 to hear their concerns about stigma associated 

with roofing products made with coal combustion boiler slag if the Agency decides to finalize a Subtitle C 

rule. ARMA made the following points: 

• In 2009, ARMA used over 1 million tons of boiler slag for roofing shingles. 

• Based on their history of being on the wrong end of negative advertising regarding health effects of 

asphalt (a NIOSH study conducted in 2000, the findings of which were apparently taken out of context 

by a competitor), asphalt roofing manufacturers are certain the same will happen if CCRs are 

regulated as a hazardous waste. 

• They don't see any distinction between listing as a special waste and listing as a hazardous waste. 

• Even if beneficial use is excluded from regulation, regulation as a hazardous waste will lead to a 

hazardous waste stigma. 

• The Stigma effect associated with a C-rule would compel them to switch from boiler slag to silica 

sand, a material associated with occupational health risk from silicosis, or crushed rock, which 

involves a larger expenditure of energy, carbon dioxide emissions, and virgin material. 

• How will spills of CCRs during the manufacturing process and during transportation be classified? 

• What is the status of slag that has not entered the manufacturing process (i.e., purchased but never 

used) and of off-spec material?
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 05, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0483. EARNEST LINGO v. EARLY COUNTY GIN, INC..

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017V016