alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(December 18, 2003)

#### Bush Realty Associates et al., Appellants-Respondents, v A.M. Cosmetics, Inc., Respondent, and Arthur Matney Co., Inc., Now Known as Best Merchandise Corp., Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[770 NYS2d 19]

*271Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered March 14, 2003, which granted the cross motion of defendant A.M. Cosmetics for summary judgment, denied the motion of plaintiffs Bush Realty Associates and Kavdo LLC for summary judgment against A.M. Cosmetics and Arthur Matney Co. (now known as Best Merchandise Corp.), denied the cross motion of Best Merchandise Corp. for summary judgment, and denied the branch of plaintiffs’ motion seeking to amend the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, so as to deny the cross motion of defendant A.M. Cosmetics for summary judgment and to reinstate the complaint against it, and to grant the branch of plaintiffs’ motion seeking to amend the complaint, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

On the record before us, we cannot conclude as a matter of law that the estoppel certificate precludes Bush Realty’s right of recovery against either Best or A.M. An estoppel certificate may not be enforceable if there is an equitable basis to invalidate the certificate, or if the party seeking enforcement took with knowledge of some defect in the manner in which the certificate was obtained *(Quantum Corporate Funding v L.P.G. Assoc.,*246 AD2d 320, 323-324 [1998], *lv denied*91 NY2d 814 [1998]; see *also Hammelburger v Foursome Inn Corp.,*54 NY2d 580, 587-588 [1981]). Here, we perceive factual issues as to whether an estoppel or even a knowing waiver can be established against Bush Realty. Contrary to the motion court’s conclusion, there was evidence suggesting that A.M. had actual knowledge that Bush’s calculation of the cost of living increase was based on a formula which was at odds with the formula prescribed in the COLA clause.

Despite the conscious decision of the managing agent to forgo certain post-1993 increases to which Bush was entitled, there is nothing to indicate that he or anyone else acting on behalf of Bush was aware of the faulty foundation for the pre-1993 increases, or that a knowing decision was made to ignore the lease terms concerning the calculation of the rent.

Inasmuch as the estoppel certificate is not determinative of the parties’ rights at this juncture, it is appropriate, pursuant to CPLR 3025 (b), to grant plaintiffs’ motion to amend, so that a resolution of all of the parties’ obligations arising under the *272landlord-tenant relationship may be achieved in the same proceeding. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Sullivan and Rosenberger, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                              78,744
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      216,017
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                        137,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   438,786
<PP&E>                             431,307
<DEPRECIATION>                     218,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     857,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              254,700
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                            56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                         185,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       857,155
<SALES>                            703,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   703,153
<CGS>                              320,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      320,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   254,461
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  20,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    112,172
<INCOME-TAX>                        25,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 86,829
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        86,829
<EPS-BASIC>                         1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.84


</TABLE>
No. 12-5982.

#### Crawford *v.*Everhome Mortgage Co.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32








SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Dennis W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said periodic report.








/s/ Dennis W. DollDennis W. DollChief Executive Officer








Date:  October 30, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29013-29014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14133]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards; Sunshine Act 
Meeting

    The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will meet on 
Monday, June 8, 1998, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., in room 7C13 of the 
General Accounting Office building, 441 G St., NW., Washington, DC.
    The Advisory Council on Government Auditing Standards will hold a 
meeting to discuss issues that may impact Government Auditing 
Standards. Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. 
Council discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Buchanan, Assistant Director, 
Government Auditing Standards, AIMD, (202) 512-9321.


[[Page 29014]]


    Dated: May 22, 1998.
Marcia B. Buchanan,
Assistant Director.
[FR Doc. 98-14133 Filed 5-22-98; 12:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned office of Rim Semiconductor Company (the "Company"), do hereby
certify that to such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

This certification is made solely for the purposes of U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose.

JULY 10, 2006


/S/ BRAD KETCH
--------------------------------------
BRAD KETCH
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
<PAGE>

                       CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND MERGER

                                     MERGING

                              eRT Operating Company

                                      INTO

                            eResearchTechnology, Inc.

                         (Pursuant to Section 253 of the
                General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)


         eResearchTechnology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") does
hereby certify:

         FIRST: That the Company is incorporated pursuant to the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         SECOND: That the Company owns all of the outstanding shares of each
class of the capital stock of eRT Operating Company, a Delaware corporation.

         THIRD: That the Company, by the following resolutions of its Board of
Directors, duly adopted as of the 22nd day of October, 2001, determined to merge
into itself eRT Operating Company on the conditions set forth in such
resolutions:

         RESOLVED, that the form, terms and provisions of the Agreement and Plan
of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") between eResearchTechnology, Inc. (the
"Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, eRT Operating Company, pursuant to
which eRT Operating Company would be liquidated by merging with and into the
Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation, are hereby approved, in
substantially the form submitted to this Board of Directors; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company, including
without limitation, Joel Morganroth, M.D., Chairman, and Joseph Esposito,
President and Chief Executive Officer, are hereby authorized to execute and
deliver the Merger Agreement for and on behalf of the Company, with such changes
therein and additions thereto as the officer executing the same shall approve,
such approval to be evidenced conclusively by his execution and delivery
thereof; and

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Company are hereby
authorized to execute, acknowledge and deliver such other documents, including
without limitation a Certificate of Ownership and Merger, as they deem necessary
or appropriate to give effect to the foregoing resolutions and the consummation
of the merger referenced therein.

         FOURTH: That, as set forth in the Merger Agreement, the merger of eRT
Operating Company with and into the Company shall be effective at 11:59 p.m. on
December 31, 2001.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said eResearchTechnology, Inc. has caused its
corporate seal to be affixed and this Certificate to be signed by Joel
Morganroth, M.D., its Chairman, as of the 12th day of December, 2001.


                                           eResearchTechnology, Inc.


                                           By: /s/ Joel Morganroth
                                              -----------------------------
                                               Joel Morganroth, M.D.,
                                               Chairman
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tong
Xudong, Executive Director and Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company..

Date: June 29, 2005

/s/ TONG XUDONG

Tong Xudong
Executive Director and Vice President
APT Satellite Holdings Limited

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the "Company") and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Robert Chapman, Also Known as Chapman Roberts, et al., Appellants, v Pierre Daniel Faustin et al., Respondents.

[55 NYS3d 219]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered February 25, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly dismissed the amended complaint on res judicata grounds *(Matter of Josey v Goord,*9 NY3d 386, 389-390 [2007]). The instant action, like the small claims action brought by plaintiff Robert Chapman, seeks relief for defendants’ alleged failure to render proper accounting services. That plaintiffs now seek different damages than sought in the small claims action does not alter this conclusion, as plaintiffs could have pursued all relief in a single action in the Supreme Court, but opted instead to pursue the claim in the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, where any recovery would be capped at $5,000, “exclusive of interest and costs” (NY City Civ Ct Act § 1801). New York City Civil Court Act § 1808 does not divest the small claims judgment of its res judicata, or claim preclusion, effect *(Chin v Interboro Petroleum Transporter,*Inc., 28 Misc 3d 78 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]). “[W]here a plaintiff in a later action brings a claim for damages that could have been presented in a prior . . . proceeding against the same party, based upon the same harm and arising out of the same or related facts, the claim is barred by res judicata” *(Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire*Co., 93 NY2d 343, 347-348 [1999]). Accordingly, plaintiff’s Small Claims Court judgment against defendant Pierre D. Faustin for failure to provide proper accounting services bars the instant action, even though, were plaintiff to have brought and proven his claims in Supreme Court in the first instance, he could have sought a larger award.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P., Richter, Fein-man, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
2017-0881.

#### In re Scudder.

Sua sponte, Steven C. Scudder, Attorney Registration No. 0044134, last known business address in Centerville, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before August 7, 2017.
#### People v Nilsen

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1688

denied
Exhibit 10.4(b)

Schedule of Warrants  (refinancings after October 31, 2005) issued by NCT Group,
Inc. to Carole Salkind during the three months ended March 31, 2006


                                                   Exercise           Shares
    Grant Date           Expiration Date           Price(a)          Granted
    ----------           ---------------          ---------        -----------
     01/12/06                01/12/11              $0.0100         521,000,000
     02/07/06                02/07/11              $0.0100         257,750,000
     02/13/06                02/13/11              $0.0100         445,250,000


                                                                ----------------
                                                                 1,224,000,000
                                                                ================


     (a)  Warrant  exercise  price will be the  greater  of: (i) the lowest last
          sale price of NCT's common stock during the five-day period  comprised
          of the date of the warrant,  date preceding and three dates following;
          or (ii) the par value of NCT's common stock on the date the warrant is
          exercised.



                                   Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1764 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1764

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 1993

      Referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 9(c) of 
the Act entitled ``An Act relating to the policing of the building and 
grounds of the Supreme Court of the United States,'' approved August 
18, 1949 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)), is amended in the first sentence by 
striking out ``1993'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``1996''.

            Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 
      2), 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Carmon v. Coleman

08/10/2016

212 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 188
Exhibit 32

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States
Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Qwest
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Qwest. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Qwest and will be retained by Qwest and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: July 29, 2009

By:

/s/ EDWARD A. MUELLER Edward A. MuellerChief Executive OfficerDated: July 29, 2009

By:

/s/ JOSEPH J. EUTENEUER Joseph J. EuteneuerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TYRONE DINKINS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 917 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 24th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to United Arab Emirates (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to United Arab Emirates (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3,391  | 13,408 | 3,638  | 17,236
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,474  | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       343,314
<SECURITIES>                                   7,754
<RECEIVABLES>                                178,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                  30,000
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             585,250
<PP&E>                                    12,696,177
<DEPRECIATION>                            10,713,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,021,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,418,280
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      25,039
<OTHER-SE>                                   607,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,021,721
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,687,435
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1,951,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (228,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (228,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (228,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        


</TABLE>