[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-11068

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cv-02368-VMC

Bkcy. No. 8:17-bk-03597-MGW

In re: NILHAN FINANCIAL, LLC, 

 

 Debtor.

__________________________________________________________________

CHITTRANJAN THAKKAR,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 

versus

GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A., 

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida 

________________________

(January 4, 2021)

USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 1 of 3
2

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, JORDAN and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chittranjan Thakkar, a member of the debtor, Nihan Financial, LLC., 

appeals pro se the dismissal of his appeal from an order by the bankruptcy court 

approving a claim for attorneys’ fees. Thakkar argues that the district court erred in 

determining that he lacked standing to appeal the dismissal because he was a 

“person aggrieved” as he owned equity in the debtor entity. We affirm.

“To have standing, a plaintiff must show: (1) he has suffered an injury in fact 

that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or 

hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to conduct of the defendant; and (3) it 

is likely, not just merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a 

favorable decision.” Kelly v. Harris, 331 F.3d 817, 819-20 (11th Cir. 2003). The 

injury requirement “serves to distinguish a person with a direct stake in the 

outcome of a litigation—even though small—from a person with a mere interest in 

the problem.” Arcia v. Fla. Sec’y of State, 772 F.3d 1335, 1340 (11th Cir. 2014).

To determine whether a person has standing to appeal an order of a bankruptcy 

court, we apply the “person aggrieved” standard. Atkinson v. Ernie Haire Ford, 

Inc. (In re Ernie Haire Ford, Inc.), 764 F.3d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. 

denied, 136 S. Ct. 104 (2015). Under that standard, a person has standing to appeal 

only when he is “directly, adversely, and pecuniarily affect[ed] by a bankruptcy 

USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 2 of 3
3

court’s order.” Id.; see also Fisher Island Ltd. v. Solby+Westbrae Partners (In re 

Fisher Island Investments, Inc.), 778 F.3d 1172, 1195-96 (11th Cir. 2015). A party 

is not “aggrieved” when the bankruptcy court’s order causes only indirect harm to 

the party’s asserted interest. See In re Ernie Haire Ford, Inc., 764 F.3d at 1326 

(holding that former creditor was not a “person aggrieved” because he was merely 

an adversary defendant with an interest in avoiding liability to the estate). 

The district court did not err when it dismissed Thakkar’s appeal. As we 

recently decided in a related appeal, Thakkar v. Good Gateway, LLC, no. 19-14868 

(11th Cir. Dec. 9, 2020), Thakkar lacks standing to appeal an order of the 

bankruptcy court that only indirectly affects his pecuniary interest in the debtor. 

See, e.g., In re AFY, Inc., 733 F.3d 791, 793 (8th Cir. 2013) (holding that 

shareholders of debtor were not persons aggrieved entitled to appeal denials of 

objections to claims). As was true for the settlement agreement that Thakkar 

sought to challenge in his earlier appeal, the approval of the claim for attorneys’ 

fees only indirectly affected his pecuniary interests, if at all. And because Thakkar 

lacks standing to appeal, we need not address his other arguments.

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 3 of 3