alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0327]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Petition for Administrative Stay 
of Action'' has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 12, 1998 
(63 FR 7173 and 7174), the agency announced that the proposed 
information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and 
clearance under section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may 
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has 
assigned OMB control number 0910-0194. The approval expires on April 
30, 2001.

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-13649 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### County of Monroe, Respondent, v City of Rochester et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[769 NYS2d 417]

— Appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Cicoria, J.), entered February 6, 2003, which, inter alia, declared that defendant City of Rochester Preservation Board has the authority to designate Seneca Park Zoo a landmark but such designation is not enforceable against plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cicoria, J. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Furnished Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Schumann, Senior Vice President  Finance and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Eric SchumannName:

Eric SchumannTitle:

Senior Vice President  Finance Principal
Financial and Accounting OfficerDate:

November 12, 2004




A signed original of this
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Investors Service Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010030EN.01000901.xml

| 6.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5718 — Bregal Capital/Englefield Capital)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 30/03

On 26 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5718. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 12-5338.

#### Davis *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

                METRO INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                         INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION                   D/B/A
         ------------------                         ------------------------------                  ------
<S>                                                 <C>                                       <C>
Metro Information Services of Northern
California, Inc.                                                Virginia                      The Avery Group

Metro Information Services of Los
Angeles, Inc.                                                   Virginia                      D.P.Specialists

Metro Information Services of Orange                                                          The Professionals
County, Inc.                                                    Virginia                      Krystal Solutions

Metro Information Services of
Pennsylvania, Inc.                                              Virginia                      Solution Technologies

Metro Information Services - ATS, Inc.                          Virginia                      Acuity Technology
                                                                                              Services
</TABLE>


                                    Page 57
CONSENT OF AUDITORS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated September 12, 2000 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan
2000"), Form S-8 dated June 28, 2001 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan 2001"),
Form S-8 dated September 6, 2002 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan 2002") and
Form S-8 dated June 16, 2003 ("Biacore Stock Option Plan 2003") of Biacore
International AB (publ) of our report dated March 26, 2004 relating to the
financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Stockholm, Sweden
June 16, 2004

Sten Hakansson
Authorized Public Accountant
PricewaterhouseCoopers AB
2017-0973.

#### State v. Sibrian.

Montgomery App. No. 27041, 2017-Ohio-2613. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Kennedy, O’Neill, and Fischer, JJ., dissent.
```

   Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge, based upon
his review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002, of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Report"), that:

        (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
              material respects the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented
              in the Report.

                                           /s/ Angelo Napolitano
                                              ---------------------
                                               Angelo Napolitano
                                               President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  January 10, 2003                        (Principal Executive Officer)
```
2017-0266.

#### State v. Belton.

Mahoning App. No. 15 MA 0142, 2016-Ohio-8416. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Neill, J., dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1306]



[[Page 3102]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-677-000]


Western Resources, Inc.; Notice of Filing

January 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on January 8, 1998, Western Resources, Inc., 
tendered for filing a Notice of Withdrawal in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 27, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1306 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13658]

[[Page 28394]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration
[Document Identifier: HCFA-R-141]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

    In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Health Care Financing 
Administration (HCFA), Department of Health and Human Services, is 
publishing the following summary of proposed collections for public 
comment. Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding the 
burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, 
including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility 
of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of 
the agency's functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology to minimize the information 
collection burden.
    Type of Information Collection Request: Revision of a currently 
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Information 
Collection Requirements Contained in the Medicaid Termination of 
Enrollment Regulation 42 CFR 434.27; Form No.: HCFA-R-141, OMB-0938-
0572; Use: The termination of enrollment contract requirements, as 
referenced in 42 CFR 434.27 allow States, through contracts with 
Medicaid Managed Care Organizations (MCOs), to restrict disenrollment 
from an MCO up to a one year period. However, Medicaid beneficiaries 
are allowed to disenroll during the period for good cause. Frequency: 
On occasion; Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; Number of 
Respondents: 8,406,945; Total Annual Responses: 8,406,945; Total Annual 
Hours: 1.
    To obtain copies of the supporting statement for the proposed 
paperwork collections referenced above, E-mail your request, including 
your address and phone number, to P[email protected], or call the 
Reports Clearance Office on (410) 786-1326. Written comments and 
recommendations for the proposed information collections must be mailed 
within 60 days of this notice directly to the HCFA Paperwork Clearance 
Officer designated at the following address: HCFA, Office of 
Information Services, Information Technology Investment Management 
Group, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards, Attention: John Rudolph, 
Room C2-26-17, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850.

    Dated: May 12, 1998.
John P. Burke III,
HCFA Reports Clearance Officer, Division of HCFA Enterprise Standards, 
Health Care Financing Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-13658 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-03-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13540]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communications 
Disorders; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communications Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: June 9, 1998.
    Time: 3 pm to adjournment.
    Place: 6120 Executive Blvd, Rockville MD 20852, (telephone 
conference call).
    Contact Person: Richard S. Fisher, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS Room 400C, 6120 Executive 
Boulevard, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8693.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. The 
meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set forth 
in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code. 
The applications and/or proposals and the discussion could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-13540 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                   
|No chart available.                                                   
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|North Carolina Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**536 KA 14-01314** 
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANDRE AMOS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered May 28, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [12]). We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to suppress physical evidence and statements made by defendant as the fruits of an allegedly unlawful approach and pursuit of defendant by the police. Two officers testified at the suppression hearing that they were on patrol together when they observed defendant leaning into a parked vehicle. Inasmuch as the vehicle was illegally parked, the officers had an objective, credible reason to approach it ( see People v Valerio , 274 AD2d 950, 951, affd 95 NY2d 924, cert denied 532 US 981; People v Barrientos , 84 AD3d 549, 550, lv denied 17 NY3d 813). Both officers testified that they were trained to identify controlled substances, including cocaine ( see People v Caldwell , 197 AD2d 390, 390, lv denied 82 NY2d 848), and that they observed a baggie in defendant’s hand that they believed to contain cocaine. They further testified that they observed the cocaine before defendant started to run away. Because the officers had probable cause to seize the cocaine and arrest defendant when they observed the baggie in defendant’s possession ( see People v Smith , 134 AD3d 1568, 1568), defendant’s act of discarding the baggie and its contents during the subsequent foot chase was not in response to illegal police conduct ( see People v Flemming , 308 AD2d 385, 386, lv denied 1 NY3d 571). Contrary to defendant’s contention, moreover, we conclude that “there**-2- 536 KA 14-01314** 

is no basis in the record to disturb the suppression court’s determination to credit the testimony of the police officers” ( People v Hale , 130 AD3d 1540, 1541, lv denied 26 NY3d 1088).

Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Wilkens, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AESP, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this annual report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    
    intentionally omitted;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. Date: April 1, 2004By:
    /s/ John F. WilkensName:
    John F. WilkensTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-6691.

#### Nourn *v.*Lattimore, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.