alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ASHTON DURRELL FARLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00128-MR-WCM-8)

Submitted: December 18, 2020 Decided: December 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ashton Durrell Farley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ashton Durrell Farley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 Stat. 

5194, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Farley, No. 1:08-cr00128-MR-WCM-8 (W.D.N.C. June 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2011162EN.01001401.xml

| 22.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/14

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUJUST LEX-IRAQ/1/2011

of 21 June 2011

concerning the appointment of the Head of Mission for the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ

(2011/359/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP of 14 June 2010 on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (1), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Decision 2010/330/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’), including in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Decision 2010/330/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX-IRAQ (hereinafter referred to as ‘EUJUST LEX-IRAQ’), including in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of the current Deputy Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, Mr Carl TORNELL as Head of Mission from 1 July 2011 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of the current Deputy Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ, Mr Carl TORNELL as Head of Mission from 1 July 2011 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Carl TORNELL is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of EUJUST LEX-IRAQ as from 1 July 2011 until the subsequent appointment of a new Head of Mission.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2011.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

O. SKOOG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 149, 15.6.2010, p. 12.

1

---
#### Nyisha Coven, Appellant, v Lutheran Medical Center, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[769 NYS2d 412]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the *768plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated September 27, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Lutheran Medical Center for a protective order barring disclosure of certain medical records.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The supervision of disclosure to prevent abuse lies within the discretion of the trial court, and, absent an improvident exercise of that discretion, its determination will not be disturbed *(see Kaplan v Herbstein,*175 AD2d 200 [1991]). In this case, where the plaintiff sought to obtain the medical records of another patient, the court providently exercised its discretion in granting the respondent’s motion for a protective order *(see*CPLR 4504). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference on Form S-8 (No. 333-91165)
of our report dated February 15, 2002 on the consolidated balance sheets of DCB
Financial Corp. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001,
which report appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001.


                                        /s/ CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
Columbus, Ohio
March 28, 2002
No. 12-8335.

#### Reedom *v.*Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6732.

#### Craig *v.*Grounds, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7882.

#### Robinson *v.*Evans, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5913
<PP&E>                                           46381
<DEPRECIATION>                                   17598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   39674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7986
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          6606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       13170
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     39674
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 18475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 693
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4417
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
        <PAGE>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31-27**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony F. Earley, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR. Anthony F. Earley, Jr. Date: November 14, 2006 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive   Officer of Michigan Consolidated Gas   Company
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                   
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | W      | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0230.

#### State v. Fox.

Delaware App. No. 15 CAA 10 0082, 2016-Ohio-3293. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

DeWine, J., dissents.
#### Com. v. Collier 5

03/24/2016

931 MAL (2015)

5

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 484
No. 12-938.

#### Christides *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-0845.

#### Davis v. Scott.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
AIR-11-028-E February 10, 2011 Exemption No. 10207 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-1093

Mr. Brian G. Saucier Gendry & Sprague, P.C.

645 Lockhill Selma San Antonio, TX 78216-5057

Dear Mr. Saucier:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Driscoll Children’s Hospital (Driscoll) for an exemption from § 45.25(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Driscoll to have the N-number displayed on the vertical tail surface of its aircraft at an approximate 60 degree angle to

the horizontal stabilizer.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in

the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Driscoll.

The FAA issued denials of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption Nos. 3876 and 6147 (copies enclosed), the FAA found that N-numbers can be misread when displayed in other than the standard horizontal or vertical position because of the general tendency while reading the English language to scan horizontally from left to right and vertically fr om top to bottom. The oblique display of the registration number could, therefore, be misread on one side of the aircraft so as to cause confusion in its identification. The FAA determined that this adverse affect on the positive identification of an aircraft is precluded by allowing only horizontal or vertical displays. The2

horizontal stabilizer on this aircraft may also obs truct an observer from reading the registration number correctly from certain angles from the ground.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioners in the enclosed denials of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemptions also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Adm inistrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Driscoll Children’s Hospital for an exemption from § 45.25(b)(1).

Sincerely,

/s/

Frank P. Paskiewicz Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service

Enclosures
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14125]



[[Page 29252]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Combined Arts Panel; Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Panel, Local Arts Agencies/Presenting Section 
(Creation & Presentation Category) to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held on June 16-17, 1998. The panel will meet from 9:00 a.m. to 
7:30 p.m. on June 16 and from 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on June 17, in 
Room 716 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20506. A portion of this meeting, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 
p.m. on June 17, will be open to the public for a policy discussion of 
guidelines, planning, field needs and trends, and Leadership 
Initiatives.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. 
on June 16, and from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and 3:45 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 
on June 17, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation of the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of May 14, 1998, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 
5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, 
National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-
5691.

    Dated: May 21, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 98-14125 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
<PAGE>

                              UTILICORP UNITED INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (in millions, except per share amount)
                                   (unaudited)

   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended
                                                                  March 31,
                                                               1995      1994
                                                             ------------------
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>
Line No.
--------
        Earnings Available for Common Shares:
(a)     Earnings available for common shares as reported       31.65     37.37
(b)     Elimination of interest on convertible subordinated
           debenture, net of tax                                0.12      0.15
(c)     Elimination of dividends on cumulative
           convertible preference stock                            -      1.07
                                                             ------------------
(d)     Fully Diluted Earnings Available                       31.77     38.58
                                                             ------------------
                                                             ------------------
        Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
(e)     Primary weighted average shares outstanding
           as reported                                         44.74     42.28
(f)     Assumed conversion of convertible subordinated
           debenture                                            0.50      0.58
(g)     Assumed conversion of cumulative convertible
           preference shares                                       -      2.34
                                                             ------------------
(h)     Fully Diluted Weighted Average Shares
           Outstanding                                         45.24     45.20
                                                             ------------------
                                                             ------------------
        Earnings Per Common Share:
           Primary (a/e)                                        $.71      $.88
           Fully Diluted (d/h)                                   .70       .85
</TABLE>
#### Mac Truong, Matter of (Truong Dinh Tran)

App Div, 1st Dept: 2017 NY Slip Op 67532(U)

denied*