alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Caroline Adamson, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 264]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered June 26, 2012, convicting defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of conspiracy in the second degree and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her to an aggregate term of 5 to 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of her plea does not come within the narrow exception to the preservation requirement (see *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. Defendant’s plea allocution establishes the voluntariness of the plea and contains nothing that casts any doubt on defendant’s guilt *(see People v Toxey,*86 NY2d 725 [1995]). To the extent defendant made a remark that warranted further inquiry by the court, the court’s inquiry was sufficient to establish that defendant understood the charges and admitted her guilt. To the extent defendant asserts that motion practice involving other defendants in the same case affected the validity of her plea, that claim is likewise unpreserved and unavailing.

Defendant made a valid waiver of her right to appeal *(see*
      *535
      *People v Bryant,*28 NY3d 1094 [2016]), which forecloses review of her excessive sentence claim. Regardless of whether defendant validly waived her right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur — Sweeny, J.R, Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
# DLA prioritizes Internal Control Program

/ Published Feb. 19, 2019

Defense Logistics Agency senior leaders learned Feb. 8 about new mandates of the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-123, which defines management’s responsibilities for enterprise risk management and internal control.

"Executing internal controls is really not an independent task, but a renewed approach to doing business. It's bigger than the audit,” said DLA Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell Williams.

The event broadened leaders’ understanding of internal controls and processes as well as legal requirements. Leaders also learned to assess risks and develop internal control procedures to address those risks. 

Navy Rear Adm. Deborah Haven, who heads DLA’s Audit Task Force, said it’s important that leaders take an active role in internal control. 

“An enhanced internal control program is fundamental to ensuring the agency provides the best support for the warfighter,” she said.

DLA’s proactive approach to risk management includes standing up a comprehensive and integrated Enterprise Risk Management and Management Internal Control Program. 

“Effective, efficient and sustainable internal controls are the genesis of mission accomplishment,” said Kelleye Elmore, Internal Control Program coordinator. “It is imperative that we take a holistic approach to identify our risks and apply sound internal controls.”

Internal controls provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that DLA’s objectives will be achieved, Williams added. They’re also backed by a series of actions rather than a single event.

“Internal control is a recognized key component of the operational processes that management uses to guide operations,” Williams said. “In this sense, internal control is built into DLA as a part of the organizational structure to help us achieve our objectives of premier warfighter support.”
2017-0163.

#### State ex rel. Blair v. Adult Parole Bd.

In Mandamus. On S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.04 determination. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 8.48   | 11.53  | 6.87   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, May 28, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13874 Filed 5-20-98; 12:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              246,135
<SECURITIES>                                        524,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                       581,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         25,000
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,640,582
<PP&E>                                           17,388,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11,280,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7,814,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,303,130
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             44,277
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,111,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7,814,343
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,188,732
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,436,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   43,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (295,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (295,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (295,880)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00



</TABLE>
#### Mario Montoya, Respondent, v Arnold Crews et al., Appellants.

[768 NYS2d 620]

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated December 10, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmations of the plaintiffs physicians submitted in opposition to the defendants’ *698motion were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Trotter v Hart,*285 AD2d 772 [2001]; *Williams v Ciaramella,*250 AD2d 763 [1998]; *Cabri v Myung-Soo Park,*260 AD2d 525 [1999]; *Waldman v Dong Kook Chang,*175 AD2d 204 [1991]; *Medina v Zalmen Reis & Assoc.,*239 AD2d 394 [1997]). Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 29, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
Cefalu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



   Date:  October 13, 2009                              /s/ Patrick Cefalu
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Patrick Cefalu
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-868.

#### Onyiah *v.*St. Cloud State University et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Cfiijjpewa County 'Boarcf of Commissioners 

319 Court Street 

SauCt Ste. jAarie, MI 49783 

Tfxone: (906) 635-6330 

fax: (906) 635-6325 

'JiTMENT OF 

idPORIATION 

•T OFBWiOr 

Scott SfiackCeton 

James J4oore 

"Don Cooper 

Qeorge XinseQa 

Jesse Xnoff 

Tton McLean 

TecCTostuCa 

November 14,2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SB 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-2009-0303 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

After due consideration, the Chippewa County Board of Commissioners unanimously endorses 

the essential air service proposal of Delta Airlines - Option #1. This proposal commits to the same high 

level of ser\'ice; the community currently receives from Delta Airlines, the same being two round trips 7 

days per week, utilizing CRJ200 aircraft. 

Air service is a critical tool in a community's economic development arsenal, and the air service 

"prospectus" offered by Intrepid International Airlines, signals significantly diminished air senace to the 

Chippewa County Intematiorj^:i\irport market: -^[r^' '^^•'l..,--.:'''^':-.''.. '. . 

Equipment 

Frequency 

Capacity 

Destination 

Schedule 

Deha provides a 50 seat jet*l^craft ^ -

Intrepid offers a 19 seat turboprop ""' 

Delta proposes 14 non-Ostop round trips per week 

Intrepid offers 4 three-stop round trips per week 

Delta proposes 700 outbound seats per week (36,400 per year) 

Intrepid offers 76 outbound seats per week (3,952 per yer) 

Delta proposes service to Detroit Metropolitan Airport - a large hub 

airport 

Intrepid offers service to Lansing's Capital City .airport - a non-hub 

primary air carrier airport (the same category as CIU) 

Delta proposes two well-timed round trips per day 

Intrepid "'prospectus" does not include a flight schedule 
Other Delta has code sharing agreements with numerous airiines 

Intrepid has no code sharing agreements 

Delta Airlines has provided passenger air service since 1929 

Intrepid does not currently have authority to provide scheduled passenger 

service. 

The Chippewa County Board of Commissioners enthusiastically supports the Essential Air Service 

(EAS) proposal of Deha Airiines - Option #1. 

Thank you for your consideration in this matter. 

*?., 

Scott Shackleton 

Chairman, Chippewa County Board of Commissioners 

^••r..»^- ; 7;...- r-

»- •,
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7121** 

CURTIS RAY BROOKS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00976

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : February 23 , 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ , Circuit Judge s , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Curtis Ray Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Curtis Ray Brooks seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order d ismissing as successive and unauthorized his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of
appe alability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable juris ts would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedura l grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Com. v. Brown 4

08/23/2016

16 MAL (2016)

4

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 652
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb  | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              | W   |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W  
|2022                                                                                                                              |     | 9.45 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              | W   |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W  
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2010103EN.01000601.xml

| 22.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5835 — Cucina/Brakes/Menigo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 103/02

On 13 April 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5835. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5835. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# Land and Maritime Town Hall officially introduces new Deputy Commander to workforce

/ Published Nov. 20, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Commander, Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer conducted a Town Hall in the Defense Supply Center Columbus’ Operations Center Auditorium Nov. 13 where he discussed Land and Maritime operational updates.

Palmer shared that the Agency is continuing daily operations as it awaits official word on any changes and their potential mission impact. He did say that Land and Maritime was positioned to possibly gain additional workload and he would communicate any definitive information as he’s informed.

Palmer took the opportunity to officially introduce the new DLA Land and Maritime Deputy Commander Ken Watson to the workforce. Watson spoke briefly about his background and relayed his appreciation about joining the Land and Maritime team. He particularly noted the friendliness of the associates he’s met since he arrived.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rose Frawert, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Mid-State
Raceway, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2000 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: January 10, 2004

/s/ Rose Frawert
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

                                       16