alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                  
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                  
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 18.00  | 18.35  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
*June 1, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4060.]

2017-0590.

#### Williamson v. Scioto Twp. Trustees.

Pickaway App. No. 16CA5, 2017-Ohio-1099. On appellees’ motion to strike pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.11(E). Motion denied. Appellees may file a memorandum in response within 30 days.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2017 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2017

    To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the 
    privileges and immunities of an Indian tribe relative to other 
      federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 14 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit regulations that classify, enhance, or diminish the 
    privileges and immunities of an Indian tribe relative to other 
      federally recognized Indian tribes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 16 of the 
Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 476) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsections:
    ``(f) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Prohibition on 
New Regulations.--Departments or agencies of the United States shall 
not promulgate any regulation or make any decision or determination 
pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934, as amended or any other Act of 
Congress with respect to a federally recognized Indian tribe that 
classifies, enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities 
available to the Indian tribe relative to other federally recognized 
tribes by virtue of their status as Indian tribes.
    ``(g) Privileges and Immunities of Indian Tribes; Existing 
Regulations.--Any regulation or administrative decision or 
determination of a department or agency of the United States that is in 
existence or effect on the date of enactment of this Act and that 
classifies, enhances, or diminishes the privileges and immunities 
available to a federally recognized Indian tribe relative to the 
privileges and immunities available to other federally recognized 
tribes by virtue of their status as Indian tribes shall have no force 
or effect.''.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

EPIQ SYSTEMS, INC.
Subsidiaries of the Company

The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2009.

Subsidiary

Where
Incorporated

Also Doing Business AsEpiq Systems Acquisition, Inc.(1)

New YorkEpiq Data Services, LLC(2)

DelawareEpiq eDiscovery Solutions, Inc.(2)

DelawareEpiq Document Review Solutions, LLC(5)

DelawareEpiq Forensic Intelligence, LLC(5)

DelawareEpiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC(2)

New YorkEpiq Financial Balloting Group, LLC(2)

New York

Financial Balloting GroupEpiq Preference Solutions, LLC(2)

New YorkHilsoft, Inc.(2)

Pennsylvania

Hilsoft NotificationsLegalLink Support Services, LLC(2)

MissouriEpiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc.(1)

Rhode Island

Epiq Corporate Services, Inc.
Legal Support Services
Litigation Support Services
Huntington Legal AdvertisingEpiq Systems Holding B.V.(1)

NetherlandsEpiq Forensic Intelligence, Ltd.(3)

United KingdomEpiq Systems, Ltd.(3)

United KingdomUberdevelopments, Ltd.(3)

United KingdomPinpoint Global, Ltd.(4)

United KingdomEpiq Systems, Limited(3)

Hong Kong


(1)100%
owned by Epiq Systems, Inc.(2)100%
owned by Epiq Systems Acquisition, Inc.(3)100%
owned by Epiq Systems Holding B.V.(4)100%
owned by Uberdevelopments, Ltd.(5)100%
owned by Epiq eDiscovery Solutions, Inc.


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

February 13, 2006

                                                     /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Venerando J. Indelicato
                                                     Principal Financial Officer




                                       23
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Extension of Receipt Date for Applications

AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
(SAMHSA).

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Receipt Date for Applications for 
SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) Cooperative 
Agreements for State Treatment Outcomes and Performance Pilot Studies 
Enhancement Program (Short Title: TOPPS II; GFA No. TI 98-005).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    A Notice of Funding Availability for seven SAMHSA programs was 
published in the Federal Register on April 8, 1998 (Vol. 63, No. 67; 
pages 17197-17203). The receipt date for applications for the seven 
programs listed was June 8, 1998. Subsequently, a decision was made to 
extend the deadline for the receipt of applications from June 8, 1998 
to June 19, 1998 for the Cooperative Agreements for State Treatment 
Outcomes and Performance Pilot Studies Enhancement (TOPPS II) program 
only. The June 8, 1998 receipt date for the other six programs remains 
the same.
    The programmatic contact for the TOPPS II program is: Sheila 
Harmison, D.S.W., Division of State and Community Assistance, CSAT, 
SAMHSA, Rockwall II Building, Suite 880, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
MD 20857; telephone (301) 443-7524.

    Dated: May 19, 1998.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 98-13915 Filed 5-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
#### Frank J. Gaidon et al., Appellants, v The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 599]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered April 25, 2003, which, inter alia, denied class certification to plaintiff policyholders in this action alleging deceptive sales techniques, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failed to demonstrate questions of fact common to the class which predominate over questions affecting only individual members (CPLR 901 [a] [2]; *Canavan v Chase Manhattan Bank,*234 AD2d 493, 494 [1996]). “Deceptive acts or practices” (General Business Law § 349) implies more than simply an invented scheme or marketing strategy, but rather an actual misrepresentation or omission to the consumer *(Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.,*98 NY2d 314, 325 [2002]). Any oral communications that may have induced members of the putative class to purchase the policies, as well as the varied use of illustrations concerning the “vanishing premium” concept and the extent to which a purchaser might have been influenced by such illustrations, would require individualized proof in the case of each class member, which would in turn raise questions that would overwhelm any issues common to the class *(Carnegie v H&R Block,*269 AD2d 145, 147 [2000], *lv dismissed*95 NY2d 844 [2000]; *see also Russo v Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.,*192 Misc 2d 349 [2002] [in which the court denied class certification in a “vanishing premium” case]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
#### Hidden Creek, L.P. v. Lower Salford Twp. Authority

03/23/2016

962 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Cmwlth., 129 A.3d 602
#### Jayden Isaiah O., Matter of (Rossely R.-O.)

1st Dept: 144 AD3d 465

denied
# DSD West Resource Analyst Workshop

/ Published Oct. 31, 2019
BATTLE CREEK, Mich., 
Crystal Leija leads a discussion during a four-day DLA Disposition Services West Region Resource Analyst workshop held at command headquarters in Battle Creek, Michigan, in October.

                RA workshop                            Crystal Leija leads a discussion during a four-day DLA Disposition Services West Region Resource Analyst workshop held at command headquarters in Battle Creek, Michigan, in October.Leija said the region offers the workshop annually, allowing its analysts to train and discuss best practices, usually at one of their sites in the West. “We are kind of like the customer service for the workforce,” Leija said. “The workforce supports the warfighter, we support the workforce. We make sure they have everything they need.”She said holding the workshop in Battle Creek this year allowed headquarters-based program managers some face-to-face interaction with the region analysts.Proximity allowed the two groups to walk through processes, explain the reasons behind them and work out any issues that the field may bring up. Leija said it strengthens the relationships between the two staffs.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Jeff LandenbergerVIRIN: 191030-D-YU183-003Leija said the region offers the workshop annually, allowing its analysts to train and discuss best practices, usually at one of their sites in the West.

“We are kind of like the customer service for the workforce,” Leija said. “The workforce supports the warfighter, we support the workforce. We make sure they have everything they need.”

She said holding the workshop in Battle Creek this year allowed headquarters-based program managers some face-to-face interaction with the region analysts.

Proximity allowed the two groups to walk through processes, explain the reasons behind them and work out any issues that the field may bring up.

Leija said it strengthens the relationships between the two staffs.
2017-1183.

#### Butcher v. Portage Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
No. 12-8243.

#### Roberts *v.*Taylor, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
*April 10, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1299.]

2015-0286.

#### Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Ball.

On relator’s motion to hold respondent in contempt. Motion denied.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 104 / Monday, June 1, 1998 / Proposed Rules 29689

Special Accomodations

These meetings are physically

accessible to people with disabilities.

Requests for sign language

interpretation or other auxiliary aids

should be directed to the Council staff

(see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to

the meeting.

Dated: May 27, 1998.

Bruce C. Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 98–14432 Filed 5–29–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[I.D. 052098A]

Fisheries off West Coast States and in

the Western Pacific; Northern Anchovy

Fishery; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Announcement of Advisory

Subpanel meeting and status of the

northern anchovy fishery.

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery

Management Council’s (Council) Coastal

Pelagics Advisory Subpanel will meet

with representatives of the Coastal

Pelagics Planning Team to discuss the

biomass estimate for northern anchovy,

which was last completed in 1995.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June

11, 1998, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West

Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach,

CA 90802–4313.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James J. Morgan at (562) 980–4036.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the

meeting, data showing trends in the

estimated spawning biomass will be

presented with an overview of historical

abundance; the quotas available for

harvest will be announced; and public

comments will be received. All

materials relating to the annual quotas

will be forwarded to the Council and its

Scientific and Statistical Committee and

will be available for public inspection at

the Office of the Regional

Administrator. The interim final quotas

will be published in the Federal

Register on or about August 1, 1998,

with an opportunity for public

comment.

Special Accommodations

This meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to

James J. Morgan at NMFS Regional

Office (see ADDRESSES) by June 2, 1998.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

Dated: May 26, 1998.

Bruce C. Morehead,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 98–14429 Filed 5–27–98; 4:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F
2017-0280.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson.

Sua sponte, Harry Earl Jackson, Attorney Registration No. 0021324, last known business address in Mansfield, Ohio, found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before April 24, 2017.
#### Ulises Martinez, Respondent, v Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch One, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[48 NYS3d 600]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth González, J.), entered July 11, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was injured when he was allegedly struck by defendants’ vehicle as he rode his bicycle. The parties’ differing versions as to how the accident occurred present triable issues as to liability for the accident *(see Susino v Panzer,*127 AD3d 523, 524 [1st Dept 2015]; *DeRosa v Valentino,*14 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2005]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug   | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |       |     |     |     |     |     |     | 30.16 |     |     |       |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |       |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |     |     | 11.85 |    
|2024                                                                                                                              | 11.80 |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |     |     |       |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Citibank, N.A., et al., Appellants, v Keenan Powers & Andrews PC et al., Defendants, and Secure Title Agency Inc., Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 895]

*485Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered December 22, 2015, which granted defendant Secure Title Agency, Inc.’s (Secure Title) motion, pursuant to CPLR 6212 (e), for an award of $491,134.46 in attorneys’ fees and related litigation costs, plus interest, as the result of the wrongful attachment of its property, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A stipulation modifying an order of attachment does *not*negate an attachment or eliminate the attached party’s right to damages under CPLR 6212 (e). Here, the wrongful attachment did not flow from the parties’ stipulations but from an order of attachment itself, which was sought and obtained by plaintiffs against Secure Title and other defendants when they commenced the case. Plaintiffs are also incorrect in asserting that there was no underlying attachment because the sheriff did not levy on Secure Title’s accounts *(First Merchant Bank OSH, Ltd. v Village Roadshow Pictures,*2002 WL 1423063, *8-10, 2002 US Dist LEXIS 11769, *27-31 [SD NY, June 28, 2002, No. 01 CIV 8370(GEL)]). Even if one were to accept this argument, Secure Title’s accounts were in fact frozen and/or levied upon on at least two occasions.

Thus, Secure Title is entitled to the damages it suffered as a result of the wrongful attachment (CPLR 6212 [e]). A finding of fault is not required to recover damages under this provision, as plaintiffs are “strictly liable” for the damages they caused *(Bank of N.Y. v Norilsk Nickel,*14 AD3d 140, 149 [1st Dept 2004], *lv dismissed*4 NY3d 846 [2005]). Under the circumstances, we find that the full amount of defense costs incurred by Secure Title in the underlying litigation was recoverable as damages for plaintiffs’ wrongful attachment under CPLR 6212 (e) (A.C. *Israel Commodity Co. v Banco Do Brasil, S.A.,*50 Misc 2d 362, 366 [Sup Ct, NY County 1966], citing *Thropp v Erb,*255 NY 75, 80 [1930]; *Correspondent Servs. Corp. v J.V.W. Inv. Ltd.,*524 F Supp 2d 412, 417-419 [SD NY 2007]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Moskow-itz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
# Logistics on location: CIIP clothes soldiers from head to toe

/ Published Aug. 9, 2019
Fort Benning, Georgia, 
The Clothing Initial Issue Point at Fort Benning, Georgia, partners with DLA to provide soldiers with top-notch clothing and textiles. Each year, between 26 and 32,000 soldiers receive uniform items from undergarments to trousers, coats and boots through the 30th AG Reception Battalion at Fort Benning. Learn how CIIP prepares soldiers to train.

View the video on YouTube.