P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50601 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. EN RI Q U E H ER RE RA
- RO D RI G U EZ D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8 - CR- 6 1 8 - ALL B e fo r e H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS , a n dP R A D O , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * Enri queH e r r e r a- Rodr i gue z ( H e r r e r a) appe al s t he 4 6- m o nt h s e nt e nc e he re ce ive dfollow in gh is g u il ty -p lea c o n v iction fo r ill e g a l ree n try , inv iola tion of 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . H e a r g u e s , fo rth e fir s t t im e o n a p p e a l, th a t h is s e n te n c e is sub st an t ivel y u n reasona bl e becau se he rec e ive d a m u ch h arsher sentence f or t hi s , hi s f

i r s til l e ga l
- r e e nt r y c o nvic t i o n t han he di d f o rhi s pr i o ra l i e n- s m uggl i ng o f fe ns e , w hi c h he a s s e r t s i s am o r e s e r i o us o f fe ns e . Fo rt hatr e as o n, he c o nt e nds United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 50601

2 t hatt he G ui d e li ne s a r eint e r na llyinc o ns i s t e nt . H er r er a addit i onal l y ar gues t hat th e s e n te n c e im p o s e dfa ils t o t a k e in to co n s id e r a tio n th e cir c u m s ta n c e s o f h is of fen se orhi s personalhi st ory an d cha ract eri st i cs. B ecau se t h ese argu m en t s are rai sed f or t h e f i rst t i m e on ap pea l , t h ey are r e v ie w e dfo rp la in e r r o r . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. Pel t i er , 5 0 5 F . 3 d38 9 , 39 1 -92 ( 5 th C ir. 200 7) . I n order t o dem on st rat e pl ai n err or, H errer a m u stshow cl ear or o b v io u s e r r o rth a t a ffe c te dh i s s u b s ta n tia l rig h ts . I d. a t3 92 . I f

he c an m ak e t hats ho w i ng, t hi s c o ur tha s “t he di s c r e t i o n t o c o r r e c tt he f o r fe i t e d errorb ut s h o u ld d o s o o n lyif th e e r r o rs e r io u s lya ffe c ts th e fa ir n e s s , in te g r ityo rp u b lic rep u tati on of j u d i ci a lpr oce ed i n gs . ” I d. H errer a h as fai l ed t o dem on st rat e an y cl ear or obvious er ror on t h e di st ri ct c o ur t ’ s pa r t . As he c o nc e de s , b e c aus e h i s s e nt e nc e w as i m po s e d wi t hi n t he c o r r e c t l y c al c ul at e d g ui de l i ne s r ang e , iti s pr e s um pt ivel y reas o nab l e , a nd the di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s c o ns i de r at i o n o f a l lo f t he 1 8 U . S. C. § 355 3( a) fac t o r s , i nc l udi ng t h e na t u re an d c i rcum st an ces of t h e of fen se an d the h i st ory an d cha ract eri st i cs o f th e d e fe n d a n t, is p r e s u m e d . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. A lon zo , 435 F. 3d 551, 554 (5th C i r . 2006) ; seealso Un i t ed S t ate s v. Mares , 402 F . 3d511 , 518 - 19 (5t h C i r. 2 0 0 5 ). H er r er a’ s as se r t i on t hathe r ec eived a har she rs ent enc e f ort hi s i l l egal r ee ntryc o nvic ti o n tha n f orhi s pri oral i en- sm uggl i ng of fens e i gnor es t he r ol e that h is p r io rco n v ic tio n p la y e dinth e ca lc u la tio n o f b o t h h is o ffe n s e le v e l a n dh is cri m i n alhi st ory sc ore i n t h e inst an tcase. T h e 2 005 a l i en - sm u ggl i n g convic t i on i ncr eas e dH e r r e r a ’ s o f fe ns e l e v e lb y1 6 a ndg a v e h i m at o t a lo f f iv e c r i m i nal h is to r yp o in ts , re s u ltin ginacr im in a l h is to r ys c o r e o f II I. T h u s , it is p r e c is e ly becau se of

H e rrera’ s pri or c on vi ct i on th at th e i n st an tof fen se yi el ded a higher s e n te n c e , a n dth e G u id e lin e s a r e n o t in te r n a llyin c o n s is te n t. T h e d i s t r i c tc o u r t ’ s j u d g me n ti s A F F I RMED.