alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-06-0289-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D JULY 25, 2006

______________________________ WAYNE POPE AND LAURA POPE, AP PELLANTS v. THE CITY OF TEMPLE, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 146 th DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY; NO. 203,426-B; HON. RICK MORRIS, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION Appella nts Wayne Pope and Laura Pope filed their notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellees John Kiella Homes, John Kiella, individually, KAM Home Bu ilders, K AM Famil y, Ltd., K iella Ma nagement , L.C., and the City of Temple. Pending before this court is a Joint Motion to

DismissPortion of Appea l filed by appel lants and appelle e the Cit

y of Temple in which they request us to “dismiss the portion of the appeal which appeals the judgment in favor of the City of Temple. The parties desire that the judgment in favor of the City of

Temple become a final judgment.” The moving parties2

represent this req uest does not affec t the app eal agai nst the ot her appe llees. T EX . R. A PP . P

. 4 2.1(b). The certificate of conference attached to the motion indicates counse l for appellee the City

of Templ e conferre d with counsel for the remaining appellees who did not object to the City of Temple being dismissed from the appeal. Pursuant to appellants a nd appellee the City of Temple’s request, by order of severance in cause number 07-06-0146- CV, that portion of the appeal between appellants and the C ity of Temple was severe d into this cause to consider the motion to dismiss. Withoutpassing on the merits of the ap peal between appellants and the City of Temple, we grant

the motio n and di smiss theappeal. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a). That portion of the appeal between ap pellants and appellees John Kiell a Homes, John Kiella, individually, KAM HomeBuilders, KAM Family, Ltd., and Kiella Management, L.C. remains pending in cause numbe r 07-06-0146-CV and will proceed in due course. Having dismissed the appeal between appellants and theCity of Temple at their request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. Appellan ts and the City of Temple have agreed to bear their own costs in this appeal. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
CAAP-11-0000556

#### Panoke v. Reef Development

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                            3107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4237
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                       1849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10309
<PP&E>                                            7093
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3680
<OTHER-SE>                                        2090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14883
<SALES>                                           4513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4513
<CGS>                                             2087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (746)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Inocenio Espinosa, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 319]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Stone, J.), rendered on or about June 28, 2002, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Buckley, EJ., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Sullivan, JJ.
# L_2011293EN.01003501.xml

| 11.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/35

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2011/729/CFSP

of 10 November 2011

amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1970 (2011). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 28 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1970 (2011).

| (2) | On 23 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/178/CFSP (2) amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP and implementing UNSCR 1973 (2011). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/178/CFSP (2) amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP and implementing UNSCR 1973 (2011).

| (3) | On 22 September 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/625/CFSP (3) amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP and implementing UNSCR 2009 (2011). |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 22 September 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/625/CFSP (3) amending Decision 2011/137/CFSP and implementing UNSCR 2009 (2011).

| (4) | On 27 October 2011, the United Nations Security Council adopted UNSCR 2016 (2011) which decided that the provisions of paragraphs 6 to 12 of UNSCR 1973 (2011) should be terminated on 31 October 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 27 October 2011, the United Nations Security Council adopted UNSCR 2016 (2011) which decided that the provisions of paragraphs 6 to 12 of UNSCR 1973 (2011) should be terminated on 31 October 2011.

| (5) | Decision 2011/137/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision 2011/137/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 3a of Decision 2011/137/CFSP is hereby deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. DOWGIELEWICZ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 78, 24.3.2011, p. 24.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 246, 23.9.2011, p. 30.

3

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 
|2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
  material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
  period covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for
  the period covered by the Report.

| |                                                      |                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
| | /s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                             | Dated: May 15, 2007
| |                                                      |                    
| | Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                 |                    
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |                    
| | (principal financial and accounting
  officer)       |                    

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

19

---
#### Shapiro v Ettenson

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 650

denied
#### Com. v. Williams 48

03/08/2016

582 EAL (2015)

48

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 133 A.3d 72
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                        

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |      |     |     |     |     |     | W   |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 5.67 |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32-8
**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**
I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the bestof my knowledge and belief:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Dated: May 5, 2004 /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR   David E. MeadorSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company
21
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1819

To prohibit any Federal department or agency from requiring any State,

or political subdivision thereof, to convert highway signs to metric units.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mrs. KASSEBAUM (for herself and Mr. DOLE) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To prohibit any Federal department or agency from requiring

any State, or political subdivision thereof, to convert

highway signs to metric units.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the De5 partment of Transportation or any other Federal depart6 ment, agency, or instrumentality shall take no action re7 quiring, directly or indirectly, any State or political sub8 division thereof, to convert highway signs on any highway,

9 road, or parkway comprising a part of any primary sys-
2

•S 1819 IS

1 tem, urban system, secondary system, or Interstate Sys2 tem (as defined in sections 101 and 103 of title 23, United

3 States Code) within such State to metric units.

4 SEC. 2. APPROPRIATED FUNDS.

5 The Department of Transportation or any other Fed6 eral department, agency, or instrumentality shall use no

7 appropriated funds to require, directly or indirectly, any

8 State, or political subdivision thereof, to convert highway

9 signs on any highway, road, or parkway comprising a part

10 of any primary system, urban system, secondary system,

11 or Interstate System (as defined in sections 101 and 103

12 of title 23, United States Code) within such State to met13 ric units.

Æ
### SERVED: JUNE 4, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF GOLDRING, AARON DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-1317 (Civil Penalty Action)


### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015EA150014) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing Docket, and the other

Attachment
- Service List Ronnie A.

### ~~/ Chief**Adrninistrati~e**SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Aaron Goldring, Respondent 1824 Henrickson Street Brooklyn, NY 11234 ONE COPY

Daniel Kohlmeyer, Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal AviationAdministration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3266 FAX: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2015-1317 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
No. 12-6823.

#### Tankesly *v.*Mills, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I A L E ON ORP AR E DE S - OR T E GA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72923 A ge nc yN o. A 074- 298- 293 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2011 ** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , C L IF T O N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i aL e onorP ar e de s - O rt e ga , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng he rappe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng he rm ot i on t o r e ope n de port a t i on p r o c e e d in g s c o n du c te din ab s e n tia . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . 

# FI LED APR26 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72923 2 W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Iturri ba rr i a v. I NS , 3 2 1 F .3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng P ar e de s - O rt e ga ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n. C ontr aryt o P ar e de s - O rt e ga ’ s c ont e nt i on, s he r e c e i ve d pr ope rnot i c e of h e rd e p o rta tio n h e ar in g . See 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2b (a )( 2) (r epea l ed 19 96 ); see a l so G a r c i a v . I

NS , 22 2 F . 3d 12 08 , 12 09 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( per c uri am ) ( no t i ce t o cou nsel s u f f ic ie n t) . T h e m o tio n w a s th e r e f o r e u n tim e lyb e c au s e P ar e d e s - O rte g af ile dit m o r e th a n 1 2 y e ar s a f

te rth e M ay1 6 , 1 9 9 6 , d e p o rta tio n o r d e r , se e 8 U .S .C . § 1252b( c ) ( 3) ( r e pe a l e d 1996) , a nd P ar e de s - O rt e gaf a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha ts he a c t e d w i th the due di l i ge nc e r e qui r e d f ore qui t abl e t ol l i ng, s e e I tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F . 3d a t897 ( e qui t abl e t ol l i ng a va i l abl e “ w he n ape t i t i one ri s pr e ve nt e d f r om f i l i ng be c aus e of

de c e pt i on, f

r aud, ore rr or , a s l ong a s the pe t i t i one ra c t s w i th due di l i gence”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
No. 12-7899.

#### Moon *v.*Vasquez, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
*January 26, 2018*

2018-Ohio-335.]

2018-0129.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Ore.

On January 25, 2018, relator filed a motion for an immediate interim remedial suspension pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(19). Sua sponte, respondent ordered to file a response, if any, to relator’s motion by 5:00 p.m. on January 31, 2018.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                          12,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,494
<INVENTORY>                                     87,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,774
<PP&E>                                         128,662
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 397,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,761
<BONDS>                                        135,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           40,382
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   397,750
<SALES>                                        557,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               557,014
<CGS>                                          454,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  454,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,489
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,501
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,758
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Garcia

CAAP-13-0003458

07/31/2014

Affirmed