alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                      
|No chart available.                                                      
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Indiana Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2005 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        S.2005

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act


 
     To make certain technical corrections, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Sections 101B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 103B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) of the 
Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1441-2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 1444-
2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II)) are each amended by inserting ``without regard to 
clause (ii)'' after ``clause (iii)''.
    (b) Section 105B(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 
1444f(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb)) is amended by striking ``clause (i)(I)'' 
and inserting ``clauses (i) and (ii)''.
    (c) Section 204(g) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1446e(g)) is amended_
        (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ``purchase'' the 
    following: ``(less sales under section 407 for unrestricted use)''; 
    and
        (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``purchases'' each 
    place it appears the following: ``(less sales under section 407 for 
    unrestricted use)''.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wade Harris, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 602]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered November 20, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

*131Defendant’s challenge to the court’s charge on burglary in the third degree requires preservation *(see People v Thomas,*50 NY2d 467 [1980]), and we decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court’s charge as a whole conveyed the appropriate standards and that the jury could not have been misled as to the People’s burden of proof regarding intent *(see People v Fields,*87 NY2d 821 [1995]). In any event, were we to find any error, we would find it to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence that defendant entered the premises in question with intent to commit larceny. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1800

SALEM JABRI,

Petitioner,

versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A29-005-735)

Submitted: February 8, 2000 Decided: March 14, 2000

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION ASSISTANCE CENTER, INC., Silver Spring,

Maryland, for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Ellen Sue

Shapiro, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Salem Jabri seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“Board”) decision and order affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. On

petition for review, Jabri argues that the Board erred in its

determination that Jabri failed to demonstrate seven years of continuous physical presence in the United States. Our review of the

record discloses that the Board properly affirmed the immigration

judge’s decision and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Salem

Jabri, No. A29-005-735 (B.I.A. May 18, 1999); see also Appiah v.

INS, 202 F.3d 704 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Chappaqua Cent. Sch. Dist. v Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co.

2d Dept: 148 AD3d 980

denied
#### Carpenter, Matter of, v New York City Hous. Auth.

1st Dept: 146 AD3d 674

denied*
#### Elisha Lumpkin, Respondent, v 3171 Rochambeau Ave, LLC, et al., Respondents, and Quality Construction Company & Contracting, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 585]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered on or about March 17, 2016, which denied defendant Quality Construction’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing the claim that Quality Construction’s negligence in providing adequate illumination at the subject location proximately caused the accident, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Triable issues of fact exist as to whether Quality Construction created the complained-of danger by failing to erect barricades around its work site to protect plaintiff from falling into a ditch *(see Hanrahan v Whiting Turner Constr., Inc.,*33 AD3d 338 [1st Dept 2006]). Accordingly, the motion court correctly denied summary judgment dismissing the common-law negligence cause of action against Quality Construction.

*512There is also a question of fact as to whether putting caution tape in the area was sufficient or reasonable to warn or protect plaintiff from falling into the ditch *(see Fernandez v Rutman,*120 AD3d 545, 546 [2d Dept 2014]). Even if the ditch were readily observable, such a fact would go to the issue of comparative negligence and would not negate defendant’s duty to keep the premises reasonably safe *(Gaffney v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*301 AD2d 424 [1st Dept 2003]).

To the extent that plaintiff alleges that Quality Construction proximately caused the accident by failing to provide adequate illumination for the exterior stairs, that claim should be dismissed. Plaintiff admitted at her deposition that she could see the stairs, and, in opposing the summary judgment motion, she offered no evidence that her fall was precipitated by any hazard she failed to see due to poor lighting *(see Beard v Themed Rests. Inc.,*128 AD3d 458 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur— Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Stephen L. Rockmacher, an Attorney. Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial De*1529partment, Petitioner; Stephen L. Rockmacher, Respondent.

[55 NYS3d 507]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Albany.

By petition of charges dated and verified November 5, 2014, petitioner alleged several charges of professional misconduct, with specifications, arising from respondent’s representation of various clients, primarily in his immigration practice. Following joinder of issue, a Referee was appointed to hear and report on all charges and specifications not previously withdrawn. The Referee ultimately submitted a report sustaining three of the charges containing six specifications as set forth in the petition. The parties thereafter jointly moved to confirm the Referee’s report and this Court, in a March 27, 2017 confidential order, confirmed the Referee’s report in its entirety. Specifically, this Court concluded that a preponderance of the evidence established that respondent had neglected legal matters entrusted to him by three clients *(see*Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.3 [b]), failed to properly communicate with another client *(see*Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 1.4 [a] [3]) and engaged in conduct which was prejudicial to the administration of justice by failing to properly appear on behalf of an immigration client *(see*Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rule 8.4 [d]).

We have now heard respondent in mitigation. We have also heard from petitioner and note that respondent’s misconduct is aggravated by, among other things, his previous censure by this Court involving similar charges mainly occurring at approximately the same time period *(Matter of Rockmacher,*100 AD3d 1180 [2012]). Accordingly, upon consideration of all the facts and circumstances presented, and in order to protect the public, maintain the honor and integrity of the profession and deter others from committing similar misconduct, we conclude that an additional censure, with conditions, is an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent’s professional misconduct *(see Matter of Krzys,*149 AD3d 1244 [2017]; *Matter of McDonagh,*129 AD3d 1199, 1200 [2015]).

Furthermore, under the particular circumstances herein, we direct that, within six months of the date of this decision, respondent submit documentation to petitioner establishing that he has completed four credit hours of accredited continuing *1530legal education in ethics and professionalism and four credit hours of law practice management, all in addition to the continuing legal education required of attorneys in this state *{see*Rules of App Div, All Depts [22 NYCRR] part 1500).

Garry, J.R, Lynch, Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is censured; and it is further ordered that respondent is directed to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in this Court’s decision.
Beneath the Skies: Logistics Readiness
 
  By Maj. John T. Stamm
                          The 332nd Air Expeditionary Wing continues the legacy of the famous Tuskegee Airmen of World War II, delivering full-spectrum integrated air and space power, providing agile combat support, developing and empowering innovative Airmen, cultivating relationships with joint and coalition partners, and posturing the wing for enduring strategic presence in Southwest Asia.    Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 332nd Air Expeditionary Wing website.
#### Kihm E. Brown, Respondent, v Ciminelli-Cowper, Inc., Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 260]

Appeal from that part of an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J.), entered October 22, 2002, that denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the *1309Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action. Defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that plaintiffs fall from a scissor lift does not give rise to liability under that section. This Court has previously determined that a scissor lift is “a device that is ‘functionally similar’ to a scaffold” *(Primavera v Benderson Family 1968 Trust,*294 AD2d 923, 924 [2002]), and thus we conclude that the scissor lift is within the purview of 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (d). We further conclude that, although defendant established that it did not supervise or control the work performed by contractors at the work site, plaintiff raised an issue of fact whether defendant’s practice of directing contractors to correct safety concerns at the work site rendered defendant an agent of the owner within the meaning of Labor Law § 241 (6) *(see generally Ortega v Catamount Constr. Corp.,*264 AD2d 323, 323-324 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 755 [1999]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| \s\ Glenn M. Dobbs                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn M. Dobbs                        |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 10, 2008                |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by MinesManagement, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
2017-1724.

#### State ex rel. Evans v. Clerk of the Scioto Cty. Common Pleas Court, Probate Div.

In Mandamus. On relator’s motion to strike respondent’s motion to dismiss for want of service. Motion denied. Relator may file a response to the motion to dismiss within ten days.
No. 12-6790.

#### Hoffman *v.*Lee et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 15.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the inclusion in this annual
report on Form 20-F of our Independent Auditors’ Report dated May 5, 2014 relating to the consolidated statement of financial
position of Royal Standards Minerals Inc. as of January 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income, changes in shareholders' deficiency and cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies
and other explanatory information.



Signed:









Mississauga, Ontario



April 29, 2016


























Consent of Independent Auditor



The Board of Directors
Royal Standard Minerals Inc.



We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form 20-F
of our Independent Auditors’ Report dated May 24, 2013 on the consolidated statements of financial position of Royal Standard
Minerals Inc. as at January 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’
equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.



|/s/ MSCM LLP               
|---------------------------
|                           
|Chartered Accountants      
|Licensed Public Accountants



Toronto, Ontario
April 29, 2016
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.62   | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | 11.61  | 6.97   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# Troop Support employees recognized at quarterly awards ceremony

/ Published March 20, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Employees from the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support were honored for their achievements during a quarterly awards ceremony March 14 in Philadelphia.

Employees were recognized for various achievements including time in federal service, superior service and humanitarian efforts.

Kelsi MacMurray, an acquisition specialist with the Construction and Equipment supply chain, and Pama Hamlett, a customer support specialist in the Subsistence supply chain, were recognized as DLA Troop Support employees of the month for their contributions to the continued recovery from the 2017 and 2018 hurricane seasons. 

Hamlett, a North Carolina resident, was noted in her citation for her customer focus and outreach in spite of potential damage to her own home. She proactively ensured warfighters in the region she supported would have the subsistence items necessary to sustain them through Hurricane Florence. 

“It is an honor to have been recognized for this award,” Hamlett said. “I am proud to be part of such a special team dedicated to providing the best support to our customers, even during very difficult and challenging situations.”

MacMurray’s continued partnership and coordination with the Army Corps of Engineers, the Federal Emergency Management Agency and DLA Headquarters in continued support of Puerto Rico’s recovery from Hurricane Maria were cited in her recognition. 

“Over the past year I had the opportunity to work with a great team that took on an extraordinary task - one that made me proud to be a part of the Defense Logistics Agency,” MacMurray said. “I am honored to receive this award, and honored to support the warfighter in both routine and challenging times.”

Not all awardees were present, but those recognized included:

**SUPERIOR CIVILIAN SERVICE AWARD**

Akilah Jackson

John Skillman

****

**HUMANITARIAN EFFORT AWARD**

Joe Cauvin

Angel Roman

**CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT**

Colleen Hunt

****

**TEAM OF THE QUARTER**

Richard Betshner

Kenneth Bowerman

Robert Cunningham

Joan Dawson

Michael Dunn

Skyler Gargan

Jason Kelleher

Joyce Marcalo

Lynne McGill

Caroline Miller

Lauren Retos

Lauren Runowski

Tonia Whitaker

**EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH**

Pama Hamlett

Kelsi MacMurray

Sally Pooler

**CAREER SERVICE AWARDS**

Sheila Clark

Nancy Mrowczynski

Debra Bakeoven

Betty Blue
Lisa Ann Shields