alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA Registration Jacket 81142-4 

Vol.3 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
______________________________________________________________ 

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 34 through 49 are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________ 
50
______________________________________________________________ 

Page 51 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through _ are not included in this copy. 

_______________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

_____ FIFRA registration data. 

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient. 

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege. 

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency. 

_____ Internal Deliberative Information. 

 

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product 

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________ 
52

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
No. 12-7553.

#### Low *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 2. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7044.

#### Johnson *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Portal, ND Compressed Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Portal, ND Compressed Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct   | Nov   | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |       | 10.19 | 9.17
|2016                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 10.19 |       |     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-10646.

No. 11-11155.

No. 12-405.

No. 12-406.

No. 12-5117.

No. 12-5584.

No. 12-5739.

No. 12-5860.

No. 12-5930.

No. 12-6118.

No. 12-6137.

No. 12-6191.

No. 12-6224.

No. 12-6244.

#### L. F. *v.*Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services, Cox *v.*Howerton, Warden, Starr *v.*United States, Florimonte *v.*Borough of Dalton, Pennsylvania, Honarmand *v.*J. C. Penney, Smith v. Monroe et al., Mizukami *v.*Edwards et al., Swisher *v.*Levenhagen, Superintendent, Westville Correctional Facility, McKinney *v.*Sheets, Warden, Gather *v.*Oklahoma Army National Guard et al., Benson *v.*Luttrell, Sheriff, Shelby County, Tennessee, et al., Davenport *v.*McLaughlin, Warden, Trammell *v.*Smart et al., Sadlowski *v.*Town of Middlefield, *1140Johnson *v.*Hendrick Automotive Group et al., Morris *v.*Cross et al., Boles *v.*Newth et al., Williams *v.*Danforth, Warden, Adetiloye *v.*United States, Ashford *v.*Wenerowicz, Warden, et al., In re Swisher, Dickinson *v.*Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, et al.,

*1139
      *ante,*p. 853;

*ante,*p. 1010;

*ante,*p. 999;

*ante,*p. 1048;

*ante,*p. 896;

*ante,*p. 947;

*ante,*p. 1042;

*ante,*p. 982;

*ante,*p. 984;

*ante,*p. 1013;

*ante,*p. 1013;

*ante,*p. 1014;

*ante,*p. 1014;

*ante,*p. 1015;

*1140No. 12-6279.

No. 12-6338.

No. 12-6361.

No. 12-6419.

No. 12-6426.

No. 12-6430.

No. 12-6516.

No. 12-6588.

*ante,*p. 1001;

*ante,*p. 1015;

*ante,*p. 1002;

*ante,*p. 1034;

*ante,*p. 992;

*ante,*p. 976; and

*ante,*p. 1034;

*ante,*p. 1069. Petitions for rehearing denied.
exv10w1



 








Exhibit 10.1




Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary




     For the 2006-2007 period, each non-employee director of Range Resources Corporation (the
"Company”), other than the Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), shall receive the
following compensation:



     1. Cash retainer fee of $40,000 per year, payable quarterly.



     2. Meeting fees of $1,000 for each Board meeting or meeting of a committee thereof, attended
either in person or by telephone.



     3. An award of 12,000 fully vested stock appreciation rights under the Company’s 2004
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.



     4. A grant of 2,500 fully vested shares of restricted common stock under the Company’s 2004
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.



     For the 2006-2007 period, the non-employee Chairman of the Board shall receive the following
compensation:



     1. Cash retainer and fee of $135,000 per year payable quarterly in cash.



     2. Meeting fees of $1,000 for each Board meeting or meeting of a committee thereof, attended
either in person or by telephone.



     3. An award of 12,000 fully vested stock appreciation rights under the Company’s 2004
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.



     4. A grant of 2,500 fully vested shares of restricted common stock under the Company’s 2004
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. MG98-6-001]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Filing

May 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) filed a revised compliance plan and revised standards 
of conduct in response to the Commission's April 21, 1998 Order. 83 
FERC para. 61,046 (1998).
    Natural states that it has served copies of the filing upon all of 
its customers, all interested state Commissions and all parties on the 
official service list compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before June 5, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14062 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification of the ChiefExecutive Officer Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), T.C. Leung, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| June 27, 2008 |
|--------------------|
|               |
|               |
|               | /s/ T.C. Leung |
|               | T.C. Leung |
|               | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
2017-1806.

#### State v. Banks.

Medina App. No. 16CA0084-M, 2017-Ohio-8777. Appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due January 18, 2018, and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
(May 16, 2017)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Belliard, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 221]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (William Mogulescu, J. at plea; George R. Villegas, J. at sentencing), rendered March 1 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and a decision and order of this Court having been entered on January 7, 2016, holding the appeal in abeyance (135 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2016]) and upon the stipulation of the parties hereto dated April 27, 2017, it is unanimously ordered that the said appeal be and the same is hereby withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation.

Concur— Acosta, J.P., Andrias, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\ James H. Moore      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James H. Moore          |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| May 11, 2009       |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1209-DR]


Georgia; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Georgia, (FEMA-1209-DR), dated March 11, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Georgia, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 11, 1998:

    Twiggs County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression Assistance; 
83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 83.544, Public 
Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 83.548, Hazard 
Mitigation Grant Program.)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-12289 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
No. 12-8021.

#### Louis *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg G.
Gruber, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director,
certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Greg G. Gruber
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Greg G. Gruber
                                           Senior Vice President, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Treasurer
                                             and Director
                                           (Principal Financial
                                             and Accounting Officer)

                                           November 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Calais, ME Compressed Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Calais, ME Compressed Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | --     | 6.20   | 12.40  | 5.69   | 3.29   | 4.76   | 4.69   | 4.00  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.55   | 4.13   | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark E. Cannon, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 691]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered March 1, 2002, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the third degree and was sentenced, in January 2001, to six months in jail and five years’ probation. In January 2002, he was charged with violating five of the conditions of his probation. Following a hearing, County Court found him guilty of three of the charges: failure to *899satisfactorily participate in sex offender counseling; failure to abstain from the use of illegal controlled substances; and failure to submit to alcohol substance abuse treatment. Defendant’s probation was revoked and he was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant appeals.

Defendant asserts that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the charges. The People bear the burden of proving the charged violations by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*CPL 410.70 [3]; *People v Brothers,*268 AD2d 607, 608 [2000]; *People v Recor,*209 AD2d 831, 832 [1994], *affd*87 NY2d 933 [1996]). Testimony was received at the hearing from Richard Scott (defendant’s probation officer), Richard Hamill (director of Forensic Mental Health Associates) and defendant. The testimony of Scott and Hamill established that defendant failed to complete sex abuse counseling. Scott further testified that defendant failed a drug test, admitted smoking marihuana and did not participate in alcohol substance abuse treatment. Defendant did not deny failing to complete both the sex offender counseling and the alcohol substance abuse treatment. His explanations for such failures were not found convincing by County Court. Defendant also acknowledged that he admitted to Scott that he had smoked marihuana while on probation. After a review of the record, we find the proof presented was sufficient to support County Court’s order revoking defendant’s probation.

Defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not produce an expert to demonstrate that his medication caused the positive result in the drug test is meritless. Defendant admitted at the hearing that he had told Scott he smoked marihuana and such admission was adequate to sustain the finding of a violation. Nor is there any merit to defendant’s assertion that the sentence of 1 to 3 years was harsh and excessive *(see People v Corpin,*269 AD2d 622 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 795 [2000]).

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.