alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011014EN.01002001.xml

| 19.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 14/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 14/20

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 15 December 2010

on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument

(2011/29/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular the fifth paragraph of point 27 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas, after having examined all possibilities for re-allocating appropriations under subheading 1a and heading 4, at the conciliation meeting on 11 November 2010, the two arms of the budgetary authority agreed to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the 2011 budget, beyond the ceilings of subheading 1a and heading 4, of:

| — | EUR 18 million for the Lifelong Learning programme under subheading 1a, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 18 million for the Lifelong Learning programme under subheading 1a,

| — | EUR 16 million for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 16 million for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a,

| — | EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the Flexibility Instrument shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 34 million in commitment appropriations in subheading 1a and of EUR 71 million in commitment appropriations in heading 4.

That amount shall be used to complement the financing of:

| — | EUR 18 million for the Lifelong Learning programme under subheading 1a, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 18 million for the Lifelong Learning programme under subheading 1a,

| — | EUR 16 million for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a, |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 16 million for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a,

| — | EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4. |
| --- | --- |

—

EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 15 December 2010.

For the European Parliament

The President

J. BUZEK

For the Council

The President

O. CHASTEL

---

(1)  
  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

---
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1942

To authorize appropriations for the local rail freight assistance program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. EXON (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the local rail freight

assistance program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Rail Freight As5 sistance Reauthorization Act of 1994’’.

6 SEC. 2. LOCAL RAIL FREIGHT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

7 Section 5(q) of the Department of Transportation

8 Act (49 App. U.S.C. 1654(q)) is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘There are authorized to be ap10 propriated to the Secretary for the purposes of this
2

S 1942 IS

1 section not to exceed $30,000,000 for each of the

2 fiscal years 1995, 1996, and 1997.’’ immediately

3 after the second sentence; and

4 (2) by striking ‘‘any period after September 30,

5 1994’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘any period after

6 September 30, 1997’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29997-29998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14477]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Clearance

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.

    The Administration on Aging (AoA), Department of Health and Human 
Services, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
the following proposal for the collection of information in compliance 
with the Paperwork Reduction Act (Public Act 96-511):
    Title of Information Collection: State Annual Long-Term Care 
Ombudsman Report.
    Type of Request: Extension of use of the report, with no revisions.
    Use: Extension of reporting format for use by states in reporting 
on activities of their Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs as required 
under Section 712 of the Older American Act, as amended.

[[Page 29998]]

    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondents: State Agencies on Aging.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 52.
    Total Estimated Burden Hours: 9,000.
    Additional Information or Comments: The Administration on Aging is 
submitting to the Office of Management and Budget, for approval, an 
extension, with no revisions, of a reporting form and instructions for 
the State Annual Long-Term Care Ombudsman Report, pursuant to 
requirements in Section 712(b) and (h) of the Older Americans Act.
    The form for which extension is requested was approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget, on an emergency basis, for use by the 
states in reporting on activities in FY 1997. It is the same form used 
by the states for their FY 1996 reports, except for minor changes made 
for the FY 1997 emergency request. These changes:
    (1) modified the wording of some of the complaint categories to 
assist respondent in categorizing some complaints which had previously 
been placed under the ``other'' categories and
    (2) Stipulated that several narrative responses which had not 
changed since the previous report do not need to be repeated.
    The reporting form is for federal fiscal years 1998-2000. Written 
comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection 
should be sent within 30 days of the publication of this notice 
directly to the following address: Ms. Allison Herron Eydt, AoA Desk 
Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 1725 17th Street, N.W., Room 
10235, Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: May 27, 1998.
Harry Posman,
Director, Executive Secretariat and Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 98-14477 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MinesManagement, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\ Glenn M. Dobbs                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn M. Dobbs                        |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 9, 2009                 |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by MinesManagement, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
### RE: Data request for O3 RIA King, Heidi R. to: Kathy Kaufman 12/02/2009 04:10 PM Cc: Ron Evans, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels, Tricia Crabtree, Lydia Wegman

Thanks!

h -----Original Message----- From: Kaufman.Kathy@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kaufman.Kathy@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 4:08 PM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Evans.Ron@epamail.epa.gov ; Misenheimer.David@epamail.epa.gov; Sorrels.Larry@epamail.epa.gov; Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov; Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Data request for O3 RIA

Heidi -- here's what we've got that addresses your questions as best we can (in addition to the appendix Ron forwarded on Monday and attached again below).
1) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ ecas/regdata/RIAs/3-ozoneriachapter3.pdf - lists control measures (p. 3-11) and summarizes baseline emissions (p. 3-24)
2) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas /regdata/RIAs/3-OzoneRIAchapter3appendix_rev. pdf - lists modeled control strategy emissions reductions by control measure (beginning on p. 3a-2) and includes more details about the control measures
3) http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ ecas/regdata/RIAs/4-ozoneriachapter4.pdf - lists emission reductions beyond the modeled control strategy for the various analysis cut points (p. 4-16) 4) The draft appendix S1a and chapter S2 provide information on control measures reductions and costs for .060 and .055 ppm. This is the relevant material available in published and draft chapters.

Thanks. -- Kathy
Kathy Kaufman EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C439-02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489From: Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/30/2009 05:07 PM

Subject: Fw: Baseline (084) inventory for O3 RIA

Heidi, as we were preparing info for your request of the 23rd, we discovered that an appendix to the ozone NAAQS RIA was not included in your package. While it does not directly address the questions you are raising, it doe provide some of the breakdowns which at least partially address your questions. We are still planning to address your questions directly over the next few days.

Ron Evans Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA Mail Drop C-439-02 919-541-5488 (See attached file: S1a-Supplemental Analysis Appendix 10-8-09.docx)
Richard K. Simon, Esq. 

1700 Decker School Lane 

Malibu, CA 90265 

(310) 503-7286 

rsimon3 @verizon.net 

By Hand Delivery 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

RECeiVeD 

JAN 4 Z016 

\)AR.'T 16 DOCKETS 

Attention: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

AGC-610 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Re: DocketNos.16-14-04/FAA-2014-0592 

january 4, 2016 

National Business Aviation Association, Krueger Aviation, Inc. Harrison 

Ford, justice Aviation, Kim Davidson Aviation, Inc., Aero Film, Yo uri Bujko, 

james Ross, Wonderful Citrus, LLC and Aircraft Owners and Pilots 

Association v. City of Santa Monica, California 

Notice of Complainant Name Updates 

Please be advised that the name of Complainant Paramount Citrus LLC has 

been changed to Wonderful Citrus, LLC, and should appear as Wonderful Citrus, LLC 

in all future filings in this matter. It otherwise remains as identified in the 

Complaint. 

Additionally, the National Business Aviation Association previously was 

identified by a prior version of its name in the caption of the Complaint, although it 

was identified accurately in the body of the Complaint. Complainants also 

respectfully request that it should appear as above in future filings. 

Richard K. Simon, Esq., 

1700 Decker School Lane 

Malibu, CA 90265 

310-503-7286 
CC (by electronic mail and first class mail): 

Rick Cole, City Manager, City of Santa Monica, 1685 Main Street, Room 209, Santa 

Monica, CA 90401, manager@smgov.net 

Marsha Moutrie, City Attorney, joseph Lawrence, Lance Gams, and Ivan Campbell, 

City of Santa Monica, 1685 Main Street, Room 310, Santa Monica, CA 90401, 

marsha.moutrie@smgov.net, joseph.lawrence@smgov.net, lance.gams@smgov.net, 

ivan .campbell @smgov, net 

Stelios Makrides, Airport Manager, City of Santa Monica, Airport Administration 

Building, 3223 Donald Douglas Loop South, Santa Monica, CA 90405, 

stelios.makrides~ilsmgov.net 

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works, City of Santa Monica, 1685 Main Street, 

Room 116, Santa Monica, CA 90401, martin,pastucha@smgov.net 

G. Brian Busey and Zane Gresham, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, 425 Market Street, San 

Francisco, CA 94105, gbusey@mofo.com, zgresham@mofo.com
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1828 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1828

To provide that producers are eligible to receive disaster payments for 
the 1993, 1994, and 1995 crops of papaya that would have been harvested 
     if the plants had not been destroyed, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 4 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

 Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that producers are eligible to receive disaster payments for 
the 1993, 1994, and 1995 crops of papaya that would have been harvested 
     if the plants had not been destroyed, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Papaya Disaster Assistance Act of 
1994''.

SEC. 2. DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR PAPAYA PRODUCERS.

    The second proviso of the matter under the heading ``disaster 
assistance'' under the heading ``Commodity Credit Corporation'' of 
chapter I of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1993 (Public Law 
103-50; 107 Stat. 241) is amended by inserting before the colon at the 
end the following: ``, including payments to producers for the 1993, 
1994, and 1995 crops of papaya that (1) would have been harvested if 
the plants had not been destroyed, and (2) would not have produced 
fruit for a lifetime total of more than 3 crop years based on normal 
cultivation practices, except that the payments shall be made only to 
the extent that claims for the payments are filed not later than the 
date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of the Papaya Disaster 
Assistance Act of 1994''.

                                 <all>
```
# Air Force celebrates 72 years of air power

/ Published Sept. 13, 2019
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 
The McNamara Headquarters Complex cafeteria came alive with the sounds of the Air Force Brass Quintet ushering in the 72nd Air Force birthday celebration Sept. 12 as Air Force personnel and civilians gathered.

Following a performance by the Air Force Honor Guard Drill Team and a video presentation, Defense Threat Reduction Agency Director Vayl Oxford, a former airman, spoke about the Air Force’s proud history and future.

“Since the end of the Cold War, we’ve not only had air supremacy, we’ve had air dominance,” he said. “That’s something we’ve cherished, but now we need to think about retooling, revectoring our thoughts about our competition. We’re going to have a better equipped, better trained adversary that we need to be prepared for — that is our future.”

Oxford introduced guest speaker Air Force Maj. Gen. Ricky Rupp, commander of the Air Force District of Washington. Rupp is a former command pilot who served in Operations Desert Storm, Provide Promise, Allied Force, Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. 

The general encouraged audience members to value their connections to warfighters.

“Our air power cannot deliver without you,” Rupp said. “The things you do every day to reduce threats and get the parts to the airplanes when they need them. There is no other country in the world that has the ability to project and sustain combat power like the United States.

“As we celebrate the Air Force birthday today, that’s what we should be thinking about — the lengths we go to protect and defend our folks who are in harm’s way.”

The celebration concluded with the presentation of a plaque to Rupp, the ceremonial cake cutting and a rousing chorus of the Air Force song.
Re: Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3493, Denial for Exemption from 14CFR 61.73 (g).

 

Reviewing the FAA analysis of my request shows a possible error in the facts that were presented for 

my petition denial 

During my original application at the North Texas FSO, approximately one year ago, my interviewer, 

a former Naval aviator, explained that a document of completion of formal instructor training was 

required to go forward. I explained that my training was done at the base level, as were all pilot 

instructors from that era. My completion was noted by being put on official orders as an instructor 

pilot. He comment was “we did not do it that way in the Navy,” so my application was not submitted.

 

I scheduled another meeting to show the same inspector letters I obtained from retired USAF officers 

that support my argument dealing with this instructor certificate issue. This information was not 

considered relevant.

I have since learned that in fact that was not the process the Navy used in the 1960s. I have met 

former Naval instructor pilots recently whom attest to the fact that they were trained at their duty 

assignment (base level) and had no documentation of such training but for official orders from their 

commanding officers to ‘instructor status’.

 

This is an explanation of a factual error in this process.

 

I also respectfully ask for further explanation of paragraph six, FAA’s Analysis, where it states, ‘while 

there may be merit to his argument, the FAA considers it to be of greater public interest to ensure that 

the level of safety provided by Section 61.73 (g) is maintained’. What I interpret that to say is that 

safety was a consideration in my denial. I find it conflicting to read my Certificates of Designation, 

FAA form 8000, SSWO7AAL202, first issued to me in March,1990, that states the FAA in their 

estimation ‘has found the necessary knowledge, skill, experience, interest and impartial judgment to 

merit special public responsibility’ as an Airline FAA Designee. I have since been chosen as a FAA 

Designee in two additional fleet types since 1990.

In summary, the Denial paragraphs 5 & 6 appear to make assertions as to a person’s credibility that 

were not supported by later FAA selection process and documentation. Additionally, the fact in 

paragraph 4 that there is no FAA license for an instructor/copilot is understandable. 

This was a USAF designation and covered by military regulations, circa 1963.

I would appreciate your reconsideration in this matter.

Respectfully, 

Robert J. Ponti
067P17

#### Robbie Dean Terry, et al. v. State of North Carolina, et al.

1. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-153)

2. Defs’ Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied

2. Dismissed as moot
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2045 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2045

 To amend the Bretton Woods Agreements Act to authorize consent to and 
  authorize appropriations for the United States contribution to the 
          Global Environment Facility, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 26 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

  Mr. Pell (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Bretton Woods Agreements Act to authorize consent to and 
  authorize appropriations for the United States contribution to the 
          Global Environment Facility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Bretton Woods 
Agreements Act (22 U.S.C. 286 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:
    ``Sec. 62. (a) On behalf of the United States, the United States 
Governor of the Bank is authorized to contribute to the Global 
Environment Facility $400,000,000, subject to obtaining the necessary 
appropriations.
    ``(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided 
for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated without 
fiscal year limitation, $400,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of 
the Treasury.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Mendoza, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 408]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), rendered February 11, 2015, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

I, Marvin Cosgray, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Buckhead Community Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 11,
2008



/s/ Marvin CosgrayMarvin CosgrayPrincipal Executive Officer