alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Naitalya B. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Melissa B., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 366]

Order of fact-finding, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about June 26, 2015, which found that respondent mother neglected her daughter and derivatively neglected her son, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court’s findings that the mother neglected her daughter and derivatively neglected her son were supported by a preponderance of the evidence. The record showed that the mother inflicted excessive corporal punishment on her daughter by striking her with her hand and with a plastic softball bat, causing the child to sustain bruises all over her body. The child’s out-of-court statements were sufficiently corroborated by the agency caseworker and hospital staffs observations of the bruises on the child, photographs depicting the injuries, and medical records *(see Matter of Tyson T. [Latoyer T.],*146 AD3d 669 [1st Dept 2017]; *Matter of Harrhae Y. [Shy-Macca Ernestine B.],*112 AD3d 512 [1st Dept 2013]). In addition, while the child’s repetition of the same allegations that her mother hit her did not provide corroboration for the out-of-court statements, the consistency of her reported statements enhanced her credibility (see *Matter of David R. [Carmen R.],*123 AD3d 483, 484 [1st Dept 2014]). Furthermore, the mother’s behavior of punishing the child by forcing her to remain in a bathroom for two days and unevenly shaving parts of her head clearly threatened the child’s emotional well-being (see *e.g. Matter of Patrice S.,*63 AD3d 620 [1st Dept 2009]).

The court also properly found that the son was derivatively neglected inasmuch as the physical and emotional abuse toward the daughter demonstrated such an impaired level of parental judgment as to create a substantial risk of harm for the son in the mother’s care *(see Matter of Vincent*M., 193 AD2d 398, 404 [1st Dept 1993]).

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
No. 12-8447.

#### Wright *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29191-29192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy
[FE Docket No. 98-20-NG]


TransCanada Gas Services Inc.; Order Granting Long-Term 
Authorization to Import Natural Gas From Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it has issued an order granting TransCanada Gas Services 
Inc. (TGC Inc.) long-term authorization to import up to 11 billion 
cubic feet (Bcf) of natural gas per year, and up to 110 Bcf over a 10-
year term commencing November 1, 1998, through October 31, 2008, or for 
10 years after the commencement of deliveries if deliveries begin after 
November 1, 1998,

[[Page 29192]]

in accordance with the terms of the Purchase/Sale Agreement signed by 
TCG Inc. and TransCanada Gas Services, A Division of TransCanada Energy 
Ltd., on February 1, 1998. This gas may be imported from Canada at the 
interconnection of TransCanada PipeLines Limited and Portland Natural 
Gas Transmission System near Pittsburg, New Hampshire, and East 
Hereford, Quebec, on the United States/Canada border.
    This order may be found on the FE website at <a href="http://
www.fe.doe.gov">http://
www.fe.doe.gov</a>., or on our electronic bulletin board at (202) 586-7853. 
It also is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities docket room, 3E-
033, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 
20585, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open between the hours of 
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., May 18, 1998.
John W. Glynn,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 98-14107 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 12-828.

#### Hebert *v.*Milyard, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8678.

#### Orr *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY'S MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         290,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  740,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (74,500)
<INVENTORY>                                     21,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               996,500
<PP&E>                                       8,444,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,538,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,323,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          923,900
<BONDS>                                        993,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,721,800
<OTHER-SE>                                    (231,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,323,900
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               849,700
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  597,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (2,200)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                233,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    85,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            147,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).  WE HAVE INCLUDED 
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN COST OF SERVICE AND
PRODUCTS IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER
REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### M.E.B. v. J.D.J.

07/19/2016

393 MAL (2016)

Denied
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Colorado Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |         |         |        |         | 138,335 | 164,334 | 180,310
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 195,131   | 211,488   | 228,796   | 247,046 | 315,469 | 49,771 | 665,351 | 698,568 | 795,628 | 971,194
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,082,658 | 1,059,391 | 1,056,265 |         |         |        |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5952 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5952

**Commission Decision of 10/09/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5952 - CPPIB / ONEX / TOMKINS) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 10.9.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/13781/13782

C(2010) 6319

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5952 – CPPIB/ONEX/TOMKINS Notification of 16.08.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 226, 21.08.2010 p.16

1. On 16.08.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Canada Pension Plan Investment Board ("CPPIB", Canada) and Onex Corporation ("Onex", Canada) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, joint control of the undertaking Tomkins plc ("Tomkins", United Kingdom) by way of public bid.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for CCPIB: federal non-agent Canadian crown corporation and professional management organisation created by a Canadian Act of Parliament to invest on behalf of the Canada Pension Plan;

- for Onex: acquisition, administration and divestment of participations in undertakings in a wide range of markets;

- for Tomkins: manufacture and supply of a variety of products for the industrial, automotive and building products markets.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission,

(signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
2017-1015.

#### State ex rel. Keith v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-1080, 2017-0hio-4406. On appellant’s motion to consolidate case Nos. 2017-1015 and 2017-1214. Motion granted.
#### Manuel H. v Landsberger

1st Dept: 138 AD3d 490

denied
#### Alexander F., Respondent, v Tracy W.F., Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 608]

—Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Sue Levy, R.), entered July 18, 2002, unanimously dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Application by appellant’s assigned counsel to withdraw is granted *(see Matter of Louise Wise Servs.,*131 AD2d 306 [1987]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal since the appeal is moot. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Saxe, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
# L_2010117EN.01008301.xml

| 11.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/83

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 405/2010

of 10 May 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 May 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 66,8 |
| TN | 108,2 |
| TR | 104,6 |
| ZZ | 93,2 |
| 0707 00 05 | MA | 50,9 |
| MK | 59,4 |
| TR | 118,9 |
| ZZ | 76,4 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 104,9 |
| ZZ | 104,9 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 47,6 |
| IL | 64,5 |
| MA | 55,4 |
| TN | 47,1 |
| TR | 52,3 |
| US | 67,7 |
| ZZ | 55,8 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 72,0 |
| ZA | 78,1 |
| ZZ | 75,1 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 86,7 |
| BR | 78,3 |
| CA | 119,3 |
| CL | 85,5 |
| CN | 81,0 |
| CR | 59,1 |
| NZ | 120,8 |
| US | 131,0 |
| UY | 72,1 |
| ZA | 87,8 |
| ZZ | 92,2 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

66,8

TN

108,2

TR

104,6

ZZ

93,2

0707 00 05

MA

50,9

MK

59,4

TR

118,9

ZZ

76,4

0709 90 70

TR

104,9

ZZ

104,9

0805 10 20

EG

47,6

IL

64,5

MA

55,4

TN

47,1

TR

52,3

US

67,7

ZZ

55,8

0805 50 10

TR

72,0

ZA

78,1

ZZ

75,1

0808 10 80

AR

86,7

BR

78,3

CA

119,3

CL

85,5

CN

81,0

CR

59,1

NZ

120,8

US

131,0

UY

72,1

ZA

87,8

ZZ

92,2

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
No. D-2711.

#### In re Discipline of Donofrio.

Anthony C. Donofrio, of Massapequa, N. Y., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 228-229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 29, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:

[[Page 229]]

    1. MainStreet BankGroup Incorporated, Martinsville, Virginia; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Tysons Financial 
Corporation, McLean, Virginia, and thereby indirectly acquire Tysons 
National Bank, McLean, Virginia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Fidelity Company, Dyersville, Iowa; to acquire 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Iowa Bank (in organization), Bellevue, Iowa.
    2. Indiana United Bancorp, Greensburg, Indiana; to merge with 
P.T.C. Bancorp, Brookville, Indiana, and thereby indirectly acquire 
People's Trust Company, Brookville, Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 30, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-142 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy and Technology

Meeting Agenda

March 25-26, 2009

Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center

201 Waterfront Street

National Harbor, MD 20745

(301) 567-2118

Meeting Room: Chesapeake H&I

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

8:30 Registration

9:00 Welcoming Remarks and Introductions

 Erik Myers

NACEPT Chair 

 Rafael DeLeon

Director, EPA Office of Cooperative Environmental Management

9:15 Opening Remarks from EPA’s Senior Policy Counsel to the Administrator

 Robert M. Sussman

10:00 Environmental Priorities for the District of Columbia 

 George Hawkins

Director 

DC Department of the Environment

10:30 BREAK

10:45 EPA’s Biofuels Effort

 Donna Perla

Senior Advisor

EPA Office of Research and Development

11:00 Chesapeake Bay Commission’s Cellulosic Biofuel Initiative

 Ann Swanson

Executive Director 

Chesapeake Bay Commission
11:30 EPA’s Strategic Plan Effort 

 Joseph Greenblott

Associate Director, Analysis Staff

Office of Planning, Analysis, and Accountability

EPA’s Office of the Chief Financial Officer

11:45 Public Comments

12:15 LUNCH

1:00 Priorities for the Environmental Council of the States (ECOS)

 Steve Brown

Executive Director 

Environmental Council of the States

1:45 EPA’s Venture Capital and Environmental Technology Efforts 

 Norman Birchfield 

Acting Senior Environmental Technology Officer

 EPA Office of the Science Advisor

2:15 Draft Report “Sustainable Materials Management: The Road Ahead” 

 Derry Allen

Counselor 

EPA Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation

2:45 Proposed NACEPT Subcommittee

 Chuck Kent

Director, Office of Cross-Media Programs

EPA Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation

3:15 BREAK

3:30 EPA’s Green Building Effort & the Office of Science and Technology Policy 

(OSTP) Green Building Federal R&D Agenda and Implementation Plan

 Ken Sandler

Co-Chair, EPA Green Building Workgroup 

EPA Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation

 Audrey Levine

National Program Director for Drinking Water Research

EPA Office of Research and Development

4:15 Charting the Next 10 Years for NACEPT: Strategic Framework Discussion 

 Erik Meyers

NACEPT Chair 

* Council members will split up into workgroups to discuss the below question. 

Key Question:

- Reviewing both the NACEPT Prospective (Outlook for EPA) and Retrospective reports, 

what issues is NACEPT best equipped to address and how can NACEPT best assist the 

EPA in the future? 
6:00 ADJOURN

March 26, 2009

9:00 Working Session: The Development of a Strategic Framework for NACEPT

* The Council will develop an advice letter in real time. 

 Erik Meyers

NACEPT Chair 

10:00 Discussion of NACEPT Internal Operations

 Erik Meyers

NACEPT Chair 

11:00 BREAK 

11:15 Discussion and Approval of a Strategic Framework for NACEPT 

* The Council will develop an advice letter in real time. 

 Erik Meyers

NACEPT Chair 

12:15 Discussion of Outreach Strategy for the NACEPT Outlook for EPA Report 

 Erik Meyers

NACEPT Chair 

1:00 Wrap Up and Next Steps 

1:30 Public Comments

2:00 ADJOURN