alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011027EN.01000101.xml

| 1.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 27/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 27/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 October 2010

on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism

(2011/58/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 February 2006 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with partners in the Mediterranean region in order to establish a dispute settlement mechanism related to trade provisions. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 February 2006 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with partners in the Mediterranean region in order to establish a dispute settlement mechanism related to trade provisions.

| (2) | Negotiations have been conducted by the Commission in consultation with the committee appointed pursuant to Article 207 of the Treaty and within the framework of the negotiating directives issued by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Negotiations have been conducted by the Commission in consultation with the committee appointed pursuant to Article 207 of the Treaty and within the framework of the negotiating directives issued by the Council.

| (3) | These negotiations have been concluded and an Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 9 December 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

These negotiations have been concluded and an Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism (‘the Agreement’) was initialled on 9 December 2009.

| (4) | This Agreement should be signed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

This Agreement should be signed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco establishing a Dispute Settlement Mechanism is hereby approved on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 October 2010.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published with the Decision on its conclusion.

1

---
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1845

To authorize the President to transfer defense articles out of Department

of Defense stocks to the Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. DECONCINI (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To authorize the President to transfer defense articles out

of Department of Defense stocks to the Government

of Bosnia and Hercegovina.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ASSIST BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA.

4 Section 548 of the Foreign Operations, Export Fi5 nancing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1994

6 (Public Law 103–87) is amended by amending subsections

7 (a) and (b) to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(a) Congress makes the following findings:

9 ‘‘(1) In the absence of adequate measures to

10 maintain international peace and security, continued
2

•S 1845 IS

1 application to the Government of Bosnia and

2 Hercegovina of the mandatory international arms

3 embargo imposed by the United Nations Security

4 Council prior to the armed attack on Bosnia and

5 Hercegovina undermines that government’s right of

6 individual or collective defense and, therefore, con7 travenes Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.

8 ‘‘(2) The right of self-defense of Bosnia9 Hercegovina under Article 51 of the United Nations

10 Charter includes the right to request military assist11 ance from other countries and to receive such assist12 ance if offered.

13 ‘‘(3) The President should provide appropriate

14 military assistance to the Government of Bosnia and

15 Hercegovina upon receipt from that government of a

16 request for assistance in exercising its right to self17 defense under Article 51 of the United Nations

18 Charter.

19 ‘‘(b)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law

20 or treaty, the President is authorized to transfer to the

21 Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina, for use solely by

22 forces under its direct control, without reimbursement, de23 fense articles from the stocks of the Department of De24 fense of an aggregate value not to exceed $50,000,000 in

25 fiscal year 1994.
3

•S 1845 IS

1 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘de2 fense article’ has the meaning given that term by section

3 47(3) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794

4 note).’’.

Æ
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.47

eRESEARCHTECHNOLOGY, INC.
Enabling the Clinical Advantage


                              CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
                              --------------------
                                    ADDENDUM
                                    --------



         This Amendment (this "Amendment") to Consultant Agreement dated May 21,
2001, and amended on December 30, 2002, December 30, 2003 and February 8, 2005
(collectively, the "Agreement") is made this 7th day of February 2006 between
eResearchTechnology, Inc. ("Company") and Joel Morganroth ("Executive").

         Company and Executive are parties to the Agreement. Company and
Executive now desire to amend a certain provision of the Agreement as set forth
in this Amendment, which shall be effective on January 1, 2006.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning
given to them in the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, Company and Executive, each intending to be legally
bound hereby, agree as follows:

1.       The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         1.1   Section 3. a) is hereby amended and restated to read in its
         entirety as follows:

               Base fees shall be $282,000/year payable in twelve equal
               installments of $23,500 by the 15th of each month. Consultant
               will be eligible for incentive compensation to be determined by
               the Board of Directors.

2.       Miscellaneous

         2.1   All references to the Agreement in any documents and instruments
executed by the parties in connection with the Agreement shall be deemed to
refer to the Agreement as the same has been amended through the date hereof, and
as the same may be amended in the future.

         2.2   This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and
each such counterpart shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts
shall constitute but one and the same agreement.


<PAGE>



         2.3   The Agreement and this Amendment may be modified or amended by
the parties hereto only by a written agreement executed by both parties.

         2.4   Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby
ratified and confirmed in every aspect.

         2.5   This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the internal laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, without regard to
conflicts of laws principles.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be
executed on the date first written above.


By: ______________________________             By: _____________________________
    Joel Morganroth                                Bruce Johnson
                                                   Title: Sr. Vice President &
                                                          Chief Financial
                                                          Officer





                                        2
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-224-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 26, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 20, 1998, Northern Border Pipeline Company 
(Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of Northern Border 
Pipeline Company's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the 
following tariff sheets to become effective July 1, 1998:

Thirteenth Revised Sheet Number 156
Twelfth Revised Sheet Number 157

    Northern Border proposed to decrease the Maximum Rate from 3.735 
cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles to 3.683 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles 
and to decrease the Minimum Revenue Credit from 1.616 cents per 100 
Dekatherm-Miles to 1.535 cents per 100 Dekatherm-Miles. This filing 
also includes one minor housekeeping change to reinsert tariff language 
in Section 3.2, Minimum Rate, which was inadvertently left out of a 
previous tariff revision. The revised Maximum Rate and Minimum Revenue 
Credit are being filed in accordance with Northern Border's Tariff 
provisions under Rate Schedule IT-1.
    The herein proposed changes do not result in a change in Northern 
Border's total revenue requirement.
    Northern states that copies of this filing have been sent to all of 
Northern Border's contracted shippers and interested state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14344 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 15, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 15, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0105. KING BIRD FIREWORKS, LLC v. HARRINGSON ZELAYA et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19CI00020
Exhibit 31.4








CERTIFICATION








I, Rodney E. Schwatken, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this amendment on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of Novation Companies, Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2015;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date:April 30, 2015/s/ Rodney E. SchwatkenRodney E. SchwatkenChief Financial Officer
#### Com. v. Hendel

09/06/2016

212 EAL (2016)

Denied
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 2,966 |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,512
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,545
<INVENTORY>                                     24,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               431,366
<PP&E>                                       2,911,368
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,420,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,221,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,753
<BONDS>                                        613,945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     702,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,221,910
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               498,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (464)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,291
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                127,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEM RESOURCES, LP

v.

DEER PARK LUMBER, INC., RYVAMAT, INC., RYAN A. ANDREWS; MATTHEW R. ANDREWS; VANESSA K. DIMEOLO;

RONALD A. ANDREWS; CITRUS ENERGY

CORPORATION

PETITION OF: RYVAMAT, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 349 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

. The issue, as stated by Petitioner is:

Did the lower court err as a matter of law in holding that KEM’s accounting claim is subject to a six

- year statute of limitations, which is a matter of first impression, and based its opinion, in part, on a statutory cause of action not pled or argued by KEM?
#### Com. v. McDonald 21

12/29/2015

793 MAL (2015)

21

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 464
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 184 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session 

                                 S. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                  SENATE AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE AMENDMENT
                  In the Senate of the United States,

                             August 6 (legislative day, June 30), 1992.
      Resolved, That the Senate agree to the amendment of the House of 
Representatives to the bill (S. 184) entitled ``An Act to provide for 
the exchange of certain lands within the State of Utah, and for other 
purposes'' with the following

                 SENATE AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE AMENDMENT:

 (1)Page 6, line 16 of the House engrossed amendment, strike out 
[$25,000,000] and insert: $50,000,000

 (2)Page 10, after line 24 of the House engrossed amendment, insert:
    (3) Transfer of any mineral interests to the State of Utah shall be 
subject to such conditions as the Secretary shall prescribe to ensure 
due diligence on the part of the State of Utah to achieve the timely 
development of such resources.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | --- | --- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              | W    |     | W   | W    | 5.56 |     | W   |     |     |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              | 7.47 |     |     | 7.23 |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1153.

#### State ex rel. GateHouse Media Ohio Holdings II, Inc. v. Pike Cty. Coroner’s Office.

In Mandamus. On motion to submit documents for in camera inspection. Motion granted in part and denied in part. Respondent shall file the unredaeted autopsy reports under seal within 14 days. No additional materials shall be submitted.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., would grant the motion in full and permit respondent to file both the unredaeted reports as well as additional material explaining the reasons for the proposed redaction.

French and DeWine, JJ., not participating.
2018-0014.

#### Thompson v. Donnelly.

Cuyahoga App. No. 106100, 2017-Ohio-8892. On appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction. This cause originated in the court of appeals and therefore should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 5.01. The clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.07.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 24


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-23375 and
333-23379) of our report dated March 13, 1997, except for Notes 1, 8 and 9, as
to which the date is March 21, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Getty Petroleum
Marketing Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of
the three years in the period ended January 31, 1997 which report has been
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
New York, New York
March 13, 1997, except for Notes 1, 8 and 9,
as to which the date is March 21, 1997.
No. 12-658.

#### Price *v.*Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.