alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.






103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1761

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
      To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1.--Forest Service Separation Pay.--(a) In order to avoid 
or minimize the need for involuntary separations, effective for the 
period beginning upon the date of enactment of this Act through and 
including September 30, 1994, the Secretary of Agriculture, under such 
regulations and subject to such conditions as the Secretary of 
Agriculture may prescribe, shall have authority to offer separation pay 
to employees of the Forest Service to the same extent the Secretary of 
Defense is authorized to offer separation pay to employees of a defense 
agency in section 5597 of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) In the event that an authority is enacted to offer separation 
pay or a voluntary separation incentive similar to such section 5597 of 
title 5, United States Code, but applicable to employees in the 
executive branch generally, the authority under subsection (a) shall 
terminate.
    (c) Such payments may be made to employees who agree, during a 
continuous 90 day period designated by the agency head, beginning no 
earlier than the date of enactment of this Act and ending no later than 
September 30, 1994, to separate from service with the agency, whether 
by retirement or resignation.
    (d) An employee who has received a voluntary separation incentive 
under this section and accepts employment with the Government of the 
United States within 5 years of the date of the separation on which 
payment of the incentive is based shall be required to repay the entire 
amount of the incentive to the agency that paid the incentive.
    (e) Total outlays by the Forest Service pursuant to the cooperative 
work trust funds accounts (12-8028-0-7-302) shall not exceed 
$271,668,000 in fiscal year 1994.

            Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 
      2), 1993.

            Attest:






                                                             Secretary.`
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1930 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1930

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve the 
     administration of claims and obligations of the Farmers Home 
                Administration, and for other purposes.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1930

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve the 
     administration of claims and obligations of the Farmers Home 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers Home Administration 
Improvement Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. DELINQUENT FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION OBLIGATIONS.

    Section 331 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 
U.S.C. 1981) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) The Secretary may use for the prosecution or defense of any 
claim or obligation described in subsection (b)(5) the Attorney 
General, the General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture, or a 
private attorney who has entered into a contract with the Secretary.''.

            Passed the Senate March 24 (legislative day, February 22), 
      1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended October 1, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, Martin D. Madaus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen B. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/    MARTIN D. MADAUS
*                 
|Martin D. Madaus                          
|President and Chief Executive Officer     
|November 9, 2005                          
|                                          
|/s/    KATHLEEN B. ALLEN
*                
|Kathleen B. Allen                         
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2005                          



|* | - A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Sheryl P. Lerner, Appellant, v Vijaykumar R. Shah, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 869]-

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated January 4, 2016, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

The defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The papers submitted by the defendant failed to adequately address the plaintiff’s claim, set forth in the bill of particulars, that she sustained a serious injury under the 90/180-day category of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d 969 [2011]; *Rouach v Betts,*71 AD3d 977 [2010]). Since the defendant failed to meet his prima facie burden, it is unnecessary to determine whether the papers submitted by the *505plaintiff in opposition were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Che Hong Kim v Kossoff,*90 AD3d at 969).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Rivera, J.R, Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Connolly, JJ., concur.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 22, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00886

- CV

Angelica Mitchell Moore and Kevin Alexander Moore, Appellant s

v.

Donna M. Brown and Alvin Benard Brown, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 426TH DISTRIC T COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the re was no error in the district court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the

district court is in all things affirmed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant s pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.
Exhibit
      32.01





Certification





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350,


Chapter
      63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
      “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-KSB”) of
      the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
      10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 14, 2008


By:
            /s/
                Bernard AlbaneseBernard
                Albanese
              Chairman
                  of the Board and
                Chief
                  Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial
                  Officer




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code).
No. 12-914.

#### Bach *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Elizabeth M. Braham, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Epiq Systems, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 25, 2011

/s/ ELIZABETH M. BRAHAM Elizabeth M. BrahamExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.2(b)


   Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (refinancings after October 31, 2005)
           Issued by NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on May 10, 2006



    Issue Date       Due Date          Principal           Conversion Price
    ----------       --------          ---------           ----------------
     05/10/06        11/10/06        $2,230,279.44      Greater of: (i) $0.0020;
                                                        or (ii) the par value of
                                                        NCT Group, Inc.
                                                        common stock on the
                                                        date of conversion
# C_2011209EN.01001801.xml

| 15.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/18

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 July 2011

appointing the President of the Community Plant Variety Office

2011/C 209/10

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (1), and in particular Article 43(1) thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates proposed by the Commission on 20 April 2011, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Community Plant Variety Office,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 24 July 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/551/EC (2) appointing Mr Bart KIEWIET as the President of the Community Plant Variety Office. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 24 July 2006, the Council adopted Decision 2006/551/EC (2) appointing Mr Bart KIEWIET as the President of the Community Plant Variety Office.

2

| (2) | The term of office of Mr Bart KIEWIET will expire on 31 July 2011, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term of office of Mr Bart KIEWIET will expire on 31 July 2011,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Martin EKVAD, born on 15 May 1965, is hereby appointed President of the Community Plant Variety Office, in Grade AD 14, for a period of five years.

His term of office shall run from the date on which he takes up his duties. Such date shall be agreed between the President and the Administrative Council of the Office.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2011.

For the Council

The President

J. VINCENT-ROSTOWSKI

---

(1)  OJ L 227, 1.9.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 217, 8.8.2006, p. 28.

2

---
# Media Advisory: DSCC to honor Borinqueneers, Hispanic community

/ Published Sept. 27, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Supply Center Columbus will celebrate Hispanic Heritage Month Oct. 2 at 10 a.m. in the Operations Center Auditorium. The event is hosted by Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and will feature keynote speaker Liliana Vasquez, local chapter president of the League of the United Latin American Citizens. Vasquez is an associate attorney with Simakovsky Law, which provides accessible legal services to the Hispanic community, and serves on the board of Proyecto Mariposas. 

The theme of this annual event is “Feats of Valor” and will feature presentations on the U.S. Army’s Puerto Rican regiment – the 65th Infantry Regiment nicknamed the Borinqueneers. The regiment served in several conflicts dating back to the early 1900s and was one of the most decorated units of the Korean War.

Media interested in attending should contact the DSCC and DLA Land and Maritime Public Affairs Office at 614-692-2328 or dla.land.and.maritime.public.affairs@dla.mil for additional details. RSVPs are required no later than 24 hours prior to the event due to enhanced security screening procedures. Plan to arrive at the Yearling Road Visitor’s Center prior to the event.

**-###-**

*For more than 100 years, the Defense Supply Center Columbus has been a vital logistics center in Central Ohio, providing weapons system and platform support to U.S. forces and other federal agencies across the globe. As DSCC’s largest tenant, Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime maintains command oversight of the installation. DLA Land and Maritime has annual sales exceeding $3 billion and manages more than 2 million unique inventory parts to support several thousand multiservice weapons systems and the Warfighters who rely on them. Find more news and information at www.dla.mil/landandmaritime*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1459** 

BRANCH BANK ING AND TRUST COMPANY , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CATHY G. LANIER; RANDY D. LANIER , Defendants

- Appellants , and TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. , Defendant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv - 01318

- JFA )

Submitted : October 22, 2014 Decided: October 29, 2014

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Cathy G. Lanier; Randy D. Lanier, Appellants Pro Se. Steven Barry Licata, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Randy and Cathy Lanier (collectively, “the Laniers”) appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Branch Banking & Trust Company (“BB&T Co.”) and its order denying their Fed
. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. W e affirm. First, the Laniers challenge the district court’s jurisdiction over BB&T Co.’s action. W e conclude that the district court correctly found complete diversity among the parties and, therefore, had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1332 (a) (2012)
. See United States ex rel. Vuyyuru v. Jadhav , 555 F.3d 337 , 348 (4th Cir. 2009) (stating standard of review); Hoschar v. Appalachian Power Co. , 739 F.3d 163, 170

- 71 (4th Cir. 2014) (discussing diversity jurisdiction with regard to corporations)
. Next , the Laniers sug gest that the district court judge displayed bias towards them , but the record does not support their claim
. See Belue v. Leventhal , 640 F.3d 567 , 573 (4th Cir. 2011) (providing standard)
. Finally, after a careful review of the record, we hold that the district court properly reject ed the Laniers’ various attempts to show that the promissory note and the mortgages obligating them to BB&T Co. were invalid or unenforceable and to challenge the amount of damages awarded by the district court
. According ly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and its order denying reconsideration. We dispense with3 oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decis ional process.
AFFIRMED
1

Opinion issued November 15, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00819-CR

———————————

IN RE GEORGE AGUILAR, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, George Aguilar, confined and proceeding pro se, has filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the trial court “to conduct a 

hearing,” asserting that he has been “unable to obtain effective assistance [of 
2

counsel] with preparing for a trial by jury” and “unsuccessful with obtaining 

discovery.”

1

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 The petition identifies the underlying case as The State of Texas v. George Aguilar,

cause number 1497176, in the 174th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Ruben Guerrero presiding.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 162

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian tribes to

receive charitable contributions of inventory.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. DASCHLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Indian

tribes to receive charitable contributions of inventory.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS OF INVENTORY

4 TO INDIAN TRIBES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(e)(3) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to a special rule for cer7 tain contributions of inventory or other property) is

8 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara9 graph:
2

•S 162 IS

1 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIAN

2 TRIBES.—

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—An Indian tribe

4 (as defined in section 7871(c)(3)(E)(ii))

5 shall be treated as an organization eligible

6 to be a donee under subparagraph (A).

7 ‘‘(ii) USE OF PROPERTY.—For pur8 poses of subparagraph (A)(i), if the use of

9 the property donated is related to the exer10 cise of an essential governmental function

11 of the Indian tribal government, such use

12 shall be treated as related to the purpose

13 or function constituting the basis for the

14 organization’s exemption.’’.

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

16 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

17 December 31, 1992.

Æ
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 16-BG-464

IN RE STEPHANIE G. REICH, RESPONDENT.

A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

(Bar Registration No. 473039)

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional 

Responsibility Ad Hoc Hearing Committee 

Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline 

(BDN 241-15)

(Decided: September 10, 2020)

Before THOMPSON and DEAHL, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge

PER CURIAM: This decision is non-precedential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R. 

XI, § 12.1(d) regarding the appropriate citation of this opinion.

In this disciplinary matter, the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (the Committee) 

recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar 

R. XI, § 12.1(c). The petition is based on the finding that Respondent’s conviction 

for making a false statement to obtain unemployment compensation did not 

constitute moral turpitude per se. The Committee found that “circumstances in 
2

which Respondent found herself [a “volunteer” for the Gray campaign who was paid 

a stipend] may not have been employment at all” within the meaning of the 

unemployment compensation statute.1 

Respondent acknowledged that she committed a misdemeanor crime in 

violation of D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and 8.4(c). The proposed 

discipline is a three-year suspension without a fitness requirement nunc pro tunc to 

July 5, 2016, the date she filed her D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit. 

Having reviewed the Committee’s recommendation in accordance with our 

procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d), we agree 

this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline and the proposed disposition is not 

unduly lenient or inconsistent with dispositions imposed for comparable 

professional misconduct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Respondent Stephanie G. Reich is hereby suspended from 

the practice of law for three years, nunc pro tunc to July 5, 2016, the date on which 

Respondent filed a compliant D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit with this court. 

 1 Report and Recommendation of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee at 15.
3

So ordered.