alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Military working dogs have food options thanks to Subsistence efforts 

/ Published Nov. 7, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Ensuring warfighters across the world have nutritious meals each day is the primary role of the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain. That role was expanded to include more variety for man’s best friend after recent updates to the military working dog catalogs that provide 27 new options starting in 2020.

Over the last several months, the Subsistence Food Equipment branch worked with the Department of Defense Military Working Dog Veterinary Service at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, to increase its dog food options for all of the military services from 1 to 28 varieties.

According to the Department of Defense Military Working Dog Program, typically German and Dutch shepherds are assigned to handlers across the services, help safeguard military bases and their activities and detect explosives before they inflict harm.

Dean Schoendorfer, a food equipment branch integrated support team chief, said since June 2014, when Troop Support acquired the mission from the General Services Administration, there has only been one brand of dog food available to the MWD program.

“Currently, the DLA depot only stocks Hill’s Pet Science Diet, High Energy 45-pound bags for quick distribution to our customers,” he said.

But one wasn’t enough for the demands of the MWDs, and Subsistence’s efforts to expand the dog food options were critical to his team’s mission, DOD MWD Veterinary Service Director Army Col. Andrew McGraw said.

 “The catalog updates will provide more options for prescription diets available for the MWDs that were unable to subsist on standardized rations,” he said. 

Schoendorfer states that under the new requirement, orders will be shipped directly from the vendor to the customer, expediting delivery by removing depot storage of the food.

Now that the catalog updates are complete, Schoendorfer said, customers will be able to order the 27 additional items beginning January 1, 2020.
#### 44 Lexington Associates, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., Also Known as Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[51 NYS3d 871]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered May 11, 2016, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate their default resulting in dismissal of their action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 18, 2016, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue the May 11, 2016 order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

*464Defendant Liberty Mutual agreed to fully defend plaintiffs in the underlying personal injury action subject to a reservation of rights on the issue of indemnification. Dissatisfied with that offer, plaintiffs brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that Liberty Mutual was obligated to fully defend and indemnify them.

Liberty Mutual moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that it was premature because the scope of plaintiffs’ potential liability in the underlying action, and therefore the scope of Liberty Mutual’s potential indemnity, had not yet been determined. Plaintiffs defaulted on responding to that motion, and the complaint was dismissed.

Plaintiffs moved to vacate the default, which the IAS court denied. We affirm. Plaintiffs state that law office failure was the reason for their default, which is a reasonable excuse. However, plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a meritorious cause of action *(Kassiano v Palm Mgt. Corp.,*95 AD3d 541 [1st Dept 2012]). Liberty Mutual was well within its rights to offer plaintiffs a full defense of the underlying litigation subject to a reservation of rights pending the determination of plaintiffs’ liability. Indeed, had Liberty Mutual failed to reserve its rights, it could have been equitably estopped from doing so in the future *(see Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. v Twin City Fire Ins. Co.,*28 AD3d 32, 36 [1st Dept 2006]).

We dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal from the denial of its motion for leave to reargue, since no appeal lies from such an order *(D’Alessandro v Carro,*123 AD3d 1, 2 [1st Dept 2014]). The IAS court properly found that though denominated a motion for leave to reargue or renew, plaintiffs presented no basis for renewal.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Feinman and Kahn, JJ.
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to India  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to India  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.56   | 8.23   | 11.10  | --     | --     | --     | 4.89   | 4.84   | 5.02   | 4.97  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.39   | 7.26   | 10.86  | 6.39   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
DSCC associates took steps against violence
 
  By Dana Thornbury
  Defense Supply Center Columbus associates took an active approach in supporting Sexual Assault and Prevention and Response Monthby participating in a 5K awareness run/walk event April 18. The active approach goes beyond the physical demands of the 5K. Prior to the event, participants heard brief words from Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and DSCC Commander Navy Rear Adm. John Palmer on the importance of bystander intervention. The key to keeping friends and coworkers safe is learning how to intervene in a way that fits the situation and your comfort level. Having this knowledge on hand can give you the confidence to step in when something isn’t right. Associates can receive resources and additional information from the DLA Land and Maritime Sexual Assault Response Coordinatorat 614-692-8846. For 24/7 response, call 1-800-841-0937. Photo collage of SAAPM 5K run event
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2004, of ANR Pipeline Company (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W.
Somerhalder II, Chairman of the Board and Director, certify (i) that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ John W. Somerhalder II
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John W. Somerhalder II
                                           Chairman of the Board and Director
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)

                                           November 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ANR Pipeline Company and will be retained by ANR Pipeline Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Com. v. McDonald

12/08/2015

490 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 457
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             181
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,302
<PP&E>                                           5,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,510
<BONDS>                                          2,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              350
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,498
<SALES>                                         14,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,235
<CGS>                                           13,390
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    178
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                119
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       119
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied Cove Point, MD Natural Gas Exports Price to Turkiye  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied Cove Point, MD Natural Gas Exports Price to Turkiye  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 8.79   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.85   | 8.77   | 10.12  | 7.03   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8245.

#### Surgick *v.*Arizona.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
# C_2011159EN.01001701.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 May 2011

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2011/C 159/06

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employers’ representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 14 September 2009 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2009 to 17 September 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 14 September 2009 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2009 to 17 September 2012.

2

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employers’ representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Juan MENÉNDEZ VALDÉS ÁLVAREZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employers’ representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Juan MENÉNDEZ VALDÉS ÁLVAREZ,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2012:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS:

| SPAIN | Mr Juan Carlos TEJEDA HISADO
  Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales — CEOE |
| --- | --- |

SPAIN

Mr Juan Carlos TEJEDA HISADO

Confederación Española de Organizaciones Empresariales — CEOE

Done at Brussels, 20 May 2011.

For the Council

The President

CZENE A.

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 226, 19.9.2009, p. 2.

2

---
2017-0803.

#### Mahoning Cty. Bar. Assn. v. DiMartino.

Sua sponte, Dennis Armand DiMartino, Attorney Registration No. 0039270, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before August 11, 2017.
#### Luis Flete Guzman, Respondent, v Jack P. Desantis et al., Defendants, and Carlos B. Martinez et al., Appellants.

[48 NYS3d 604]

*581Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lizbeth Gonzalez, J.), entered January 13, 2016, which, upon reargument, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment “on the issue of fault,” unanimously modified, on the law, to grant plaintiff’s motion to the extent of finding no culpable conduct by plaintiff on the issue of liability, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Given that plaintiff expressly sought summary judgment on the issue of liability “against all defendants,” and that the court granted plaintiff’s motion “on the issue of fault,” it appears that both plaintiff and the court misunderstood this Court’s holdings in *Garcia v Tri-County Ambulette Serv.*(282 AD2d 206 [1st Dept 2001]) and *Mello v Narco Cab Corp.*(105 AD3d 634 [1st Dept 2013]). In fact, plaintiff, as an innocent back-seat passenger, and in the absence of any finding as a matter of law of the defendants’ respective liability, was entitled to summary judgment only to the extent of finding no culpable conduct by him on the issue of liability *(see Oluwatayo v Dulinayan,*142 AD3d 113, 117 [1st Dept 2016]).

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Moskowitz, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Slav Stein, as President and Chief Executive Officer of AESP, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge: 1. The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: April 1, 2004/s/ Slav SteinSlav SteinPresident and Chief
Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 5, 2017

d1212 

# Order

Clerk January 5, 2017

154072 & (18)(24)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154072

COA: 331152

Wayne CC: 10

- 005835

- FC

GLORIA LYNN COLUMBERT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to supplement is GRANTED. The application

for leave to appeal the May 17, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is

DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR

6.502(G). The motion to remand is DENIED.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                            
|No chart available.                                                            
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024