alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010134EN.01005901.xml

| 1.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/59

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 474/2010

of 31 May 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 June 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 May 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 51,1 |
| MK | 50,2 |
| TN | 74,3 |
| TR | 63,0 |
| ZZ | 59,7 |
| 0707 00 05 | AL | 41,0 |
| MA | 46,5 |
| MK | 57,4 |
| TR | 120,9 |
| ZZ | 66,5 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 111,1 |
| ZZ | 111,1 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 92,0 |
| BR | 112,1 |
| TR | 93,6 |
| ZA | 102,2 |
| ZZ | 100,0 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 90,1 |
| BR | 79,2 |
| CA | 113,1 |
| CL | 95,4 |
| CN | 51,4 |
| MK | 26,7 |
| NZ | 106,6 |
| US | 148,6 |
| ZA | 90,6 |
| ZZ | 89,1 |
| 0809 20 95 | TR | 526,5 |
| US | 328,1 |
| ZZ | 427,3 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

51,1

MK

50,2

TN

74,3

TR

63,0

ZZ

59,7

0707 00 05

AL

41,0

MA

46,5

MK

57,4

TR

120,9

ZZ

66,5

0709 90 70

TR

111,1

ZZ

111,1

0805 50 10

AR

92,0

BR

112,1

TR

93,6

ZA

102,2

ZZ

100,0

0808 10 80

AR

90,1

BR

79,2

CA

113,1

CL

95,4

CN

51,4

MK

26,7

NZ

106,6

US

148,6

ZA

90,6

ZZ

89,1

0809 20 95

TR

526,5

US

328,1

ZZ

427,3

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
#### Lukes Jacob R., Matter of (Cynthia R.)

1st Dept: 148 AD3d 420

denied
Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
     (logo)        Suite 1200                          Telephone (714) 436-7100
                   695 Town Center Drive               Facsimile: (714) 436-7200
                   Costa Mesa, California 92626-1924


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'REPORT

To Long Beach Mortgage Company:

We have examined  management's  assertion  about Long Beach  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1996,  included in the
accompanying  management  assertion.  Management is  responsible  for Long Beach
Mortgage  Company's  compliance  with those  minimum  servicing  standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test  basis,  evidence  about  Long  Beach  Mortgage  Company's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide a legal  determination on Long Beach Mortgage  Company's  compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Long Beach Mortgage Company complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


March 28, 1997



DELOITTE TOUCHE
TOHMATSU
INTERNATIONAL
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed September 15, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-0558

Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-14630 SP, 20-186 AP

________________

Progressive American Insurance Company,

Petitioner,

vs.

Dr. Car Glass, LLC, etc.,

Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the County Court for MiamiDade County, Michaelle Gonzalez-Paulson, Judge.

Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. and Alexandra Valdes and Kurt T. 

Koehler, for petitioner.

Chad Barr Law, and Chad A. Barr and Virginia E. Davis Horton 

(Altamonte Springs), for respondent.

Before HENDON, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Petitioner Progressive American Insurance Company seeks certiorari 

review of a trial court order denying a motion to dismiss or to compel 

appraisal. 

The trial court ordinarily has discretion to determine the order in 

which it disposes of the declaratory judgment counts and the breach of 

contract count. Barbato v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., 319 So. 3d 96, 97 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2021) (“Neither can it be said that, in this case, no reasonable 

judge would have required appraisal to take place before a coverage 

determination was made.”). In this case, the trial court stayed the breach 

count and deferred ruling on the motion to compel appraisal until after 

resolution of the declaratory judgment counts. As this court explained:

[W]here declaratory counts challeng[e] the enforceability of an 

appraisal clause exist, courts must enjoy no less power to 

decide whether to address such arguments in an adjudication 

of the merits of such counts, or in response to a motion to 

compel appraisal, before the appraisal can be enforced, as well 

as to decide whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted.

[...]

Because these are challenges targeting the enforceability of the 

appraisal and other policy provisions themselves, the trial court 

could not have granted the motion to compel appraisal as to the 

breach of contract claim without improperly and prematurely 

adjudicating these issues with regard to the declaratory 

judgment claims.
3

People’s Tr. Ins. Co. v. Marzouka, 320 So. 3d 945, 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)

(citations omitted). Accordingly, there was no departure from the essential 

requirements of the law. Additionally, Progressive fails to show irreparable 

harm where, as here, the trial court stayed the breach of contract claim. 

Petition dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29757-29758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 98-070]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Space Science Advisory Committee 
(SScAC), Structure and Evolution of the Universe Advisory Subcommittee; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Space 
Science Advisory Committee, Structure and Evolution of the Universe 
Subcommittee.

DATES: Tuesday, June 30, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and Wednesday, 
July 1, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Phillips 
Auditorium, Building D, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Alan N. Bunner, Code SA, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-0364.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting includes the 
following topics:

--State of Space Science
--Theme Updates
--Current Programs and Mission Updates
--Technology Programs and Reviews
--Strategic Planning
--Public Relations
--Other Issues Facing the Subcommittee

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.


[[Page 29758]]


    Dated: May 21, 1998.
Matthew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-14398 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,479
<PP&E>                                             190
<DEPRECIATION>                                     134
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              391
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           346
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,847
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,745)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,745)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
#### Altschuler v Jobman 478/480, LLC

Sup Ct, NY County, 12/8/16 (135 AD3d 439)

denied
Cfiijjpew aCount y 'Boarc f o f Commissioner

s 31 9 Cour t Stree t SauC t Ste . jAarie , M I 4978 3 Tfxone : (906) 635-6330 fax : (906 ) 635-632

5 

### 'JiTMEN T O F idPORIATIO N • T OFBWiO r Scot

t SfiackCeto n Jame s J4oor

e "Do n Coope r Qeorg e XinseQa Jess e Xnof f Tto n McLea n TecCTostuC

a November

14,201 1 Mr . Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai r Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . DEPARTMENT O F TRANSPORTATIO N Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S B Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : DOT-OST-2009-030 3 Dea r Mr . DeVany : Afte r du e consideration , th e Chippew aCount y Boar d o f Commissioner s unanimousl y endorse s th e essential ai r

servic e proposal o f

Delt aAirline s - Optio n #1 . Thi s proposal commit s t o th e sam e hig h leve l o f ser\'ice ; th e communit

y currentl y receive s fro

mDelt aAirlines , th e sam e bein g tw o roun d trip s 7 day s pe r week , utilizin g CRJ20 0 aircraft . Ai r servic e i s acritica

l too l in acommunity' s economi c developmen t arsenal , an d th e ai r

servic e "prospectus " offere d b y Intrepi d International Airlines , signal s significantl y diminishe d ai r senac e t o th e Chippew aCount

y Intematiorj^:i\irport

market : -^[r^ ' '^^•'l..,--.:'''^':-.''. . ' . . Equipment Frequenc y Capacit y Destinatio n

Schedul e Deh aprovide s a5 0 sea t jet*l^craf t ^ - Intrepi d offer s a1 9 sea

t turbopro p "" ' Delt apropose s 1 4 non-Osto p roun d trip s pe r

wee k Intrepi d offer s 4 three-sto p roun d trip s per week Delt apropose s 70 0 outboun d seat s pe r wee k (36,40 0 per

year ) Intrepi d offer s 7 6 outboun d seat s per week (3,95 2 pe r

yer ) Delt apropose s servic e t o Detroi t Metropolitan Airpor

t - alarg e hub airpor t Intrepi d offer s servic e to Lansing' s Capital Cit y .airport - anon-hu b primar y ai r carrie r airpor t (th e sam e categor

y a s CIU ) Delt apropose s tw o well-time d roun d trip s per da y Intrepi d "'prospectus " doe s no t includ e aflight

schedul eOther Delt aha s cod e sharin g agreement s wit h numerou s airiine s Intrepi d ha s n o cod e sharin g agreement s DeltaAirline s ha s provide d passenge r ai r servic e sinc e 192 9 Intrepi d doe s no t

currentl y hav e authorit

y to provid e schedule d passenge r service . Th e Chippew aCount

y Boar d o f Commissioner s enthusiasticall y support s th e Essentia l Ai r Servic e (EAS ) proposa

l o f Deh aAiriine s - Optio n #1 . Than k yo u fo r your consideratio n i n thi s matter . *?. ,

Scot t Shackleto n Chairman , Chippew aCount y Boar d o f Commissioner s

^••r..»^ - ; 7;... - r -

» - • ,
#### People v Collette

4th Dept: 142 AD3d 1300

denied
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Hawaii Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Hawaii Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 2      | 2      | 2      | 3      | 2      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 3      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      |       
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 2      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Cedeno, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 540]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), rendered December 9, 2014, unanimously affirmed.

Application by defendant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of APT Satellite Holdings Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ni
Yifeng, Executive Director and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: June 28, 2007
                                         /s/ Ni Yifeng
                                         ------------------------------------
                                         Ni Yifeng
                                         Executive Director and President
                                         APT Satellite Holdings Limited
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|California Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|California Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 14,569 | 17,498 | 17,575 | 15,868 | 18,066 | 14,370 | 11,065
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 14,754 | 96,442 | 84,220 | 80,210 | 63,251 | 62,160 | 63,297 | 69,386 | 68,370 | 61,810
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,757 | 49,766 | 41,878 | 39,452 | 37,337 | 37,865 | 57,234 | 56,936 | 64,689 | 63,127
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 64,931 | 44,379 | 51,154 | 49,846 | 42,989 | 43,838 | 40,830 | 41,146 | 39,720 | 38,789
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 35,681 | 35,254 | 31,658 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF****THESARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Euramax International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the period ending December 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. David Smith, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  J. David Smith              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| J. David  Smith                       |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
| March 25,  2004                       |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chad Johnson, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 233]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 24, 2014 *(People v Johnson,*123 AD3d 1055 [2014]), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered January 17, 2012.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Duffy and LaSalle, JJ., concur.