alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5909 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5909

**Commission Decision of 06/08/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5909 - RETTIG / NORDKALK) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 06.08.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/12081

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010) 5601

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5909 – RETTIG/ NORDKALK Notification of 09/07/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 192, 16/07/2010, p.9

1. On 09/07/2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4, and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of the Merger Regulation by which Rettig Group Ltd ("Rettig", Finland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Nordkalk Corporation ("Nordkalk", Finland) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

· Rettig : indoor heating/climatisation, shipping

· Nordkalk : manufacture of limestone-based products

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraphs 5(b) and 5(d) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] ("Notice on a simplified procedure").

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Isabelle Benoliel for Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 489 |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 174 |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-876.

#### Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Co. et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Vessel to Philippines (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Vessel to Philippines (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct   | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 3,378 | 3,445 | 0  
|2024                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |       |       |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersignedhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| \s\ Glenn M. Dobbs                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Glenn M. Dobbs                        |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| May 10, 2007                          |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MinesManagement, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### Com. v. Palmer

06/16/2016

129 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 605
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Timothy A. Dawson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Registrant"), hereby certify that:

          1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the period endedMarch 31, 2004;
          2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

          3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

          4.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

          5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

May 19, 2004
/s/ Timothy A. Dawson 
Timothy A. Dawson 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-735.

#### Young *v.*Addison, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2011097EN.01004601.xml

| 12.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/46

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/230/CFSP

of 8 April 2011

implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (1), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof, in conjunction with Article 31(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP.

| (2) | In view of the developments in Côte d’Ivoire, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should be amended, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In view of the developments in Côte d’Ivoire, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 April 2011.

For the Council

The President

MARTONYI J.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.

1

---

ANNEX

ENTITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1

| 1. | SIR (Ivorian Refining Company) |
| --- | --- |
| 2. | Autonomous Port of Abidjan |
| 3. | Autonomous Port of San Pedro |
| 4. | CGFCC (Coffee and Cocoa Trade Management Committee) |

1.

SIR (Ivorian Refining Company)

2.

Autonomous Port of Abidjan

3.

Autonomous Port of San Pedro

4.

CGFCC (Coffee and Cocoa Trade Management Committee)

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2339

KATHRYN FLOYD CAUSEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COLEMAN RANDALL, Human Resources Manager; CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Thomas E. Rogers, III, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-1068) Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: May 12, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathryn Floyd Causey, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Reyburn Williams Lominack, III, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Kathryn Floyd Causey appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief without prejudice in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso ns stated by the magistrate judge. *See Causey v. Randall , No. CA-03-1068 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004). Causey’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2012178EN.01001501.xml

| 10.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 178/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/15

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2011/344/EU of 30 May 2011 on granting Union financial assistance to Portugal

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 159 of 17 June 2011
  )

The title on the contents page and on page 88:

for:

‘Council Implementing Decision of 30 May 2011 on granting Union financial assistance to Portugal’,

read:

‘Council Implementing Decision of 17 May 2011 on granting Union financial assistance to Portugal’;

on page 92, place and date of signature:

for:

‘Done at Brussels, 30 May 2011.’,

read:

‘Done at Brussels, 17 May 2011.’;

on page 92, signature:

for:

‘
  CSÉFALVAY Z.’,

read:

‘
  MATOLCSKY G.’.

---
October 5, 2015

Dear Mr. Einreinhof:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 3056). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e., fixe d-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the
aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 10/19/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
0 180,546 59%

- - 1-9 59,419 19% $20,493 0.65 10-19 12,332 4% $21,260 0.79 20-29 7,774 3% $21,225 0.83 30-39 5,839 2% $21,340 0.85 40-49 4,511 1% $21,324 0.87 50-99 12,648 4% $21,353 0.89 100-124 3,702 1% $21,403 0.91 125-149 2,761 1% $21,342 0.92 150-174 2,134 1% $21,316 0.93 175-199 1,673 1% $21,119 0.93 200+ 14,933 5% $20,562 0.96 Total 308,272 100% $20,840 0.80 Denominator: All TINs with 1+ EPs and at least one beneficiary attributed under MSPB method. Note: MSPB episodes were attributed to all TINs billed by an EP during the episode's index admission. Distribution of Attributed Episodes under MSPB Method - All TINs with 1+ EPs

MSPB Episodes Attributed Number of

TINs Percent of

TINs Mean risk-adjusted

standardized cost per MSPB

episode Average

Reliability
# L_2010205EN.01000201.xml

| 6.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 205/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 205/2

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 706/2010

of 5 August 2010

correcting the Spanish, French, Portuguese and Romanian versions of Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 143, Article 144(1), Articles 148 and 156, and Article 188(2) in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An error appears in the Spanish, French and Romanian language versions of the text of Article 13(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 (2). Moreover, another error appears in the Portuguese version of Part I of Annex I to that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An error appears in the Spanish, French and Romanian language versions of the text of Article 13(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 (2). Moreover, another error appears in the Portuguese version of Part I of Annex I to that Regulation.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Concerns only the Spanish, French, Portuguese and Romanian language versions.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 August 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.

2

---
#### Jose Jimenez, Plaintiff, and Tanya Morales, Respondent, v Patrick Yanne et al., Appellants.

[55 NYS3d 652]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered April 12, 2016, which denied defendants’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement as to plaintiff Tanya Morales, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

The email communications between plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ counsel sufficiently set forth an enforceable agreement to settle plaintiffs’ personal injury claims, including that of plaintiff Morales *(see Williamson v Delsener,*59 AD3d 291 [1st Dept 2009]). Plaintiffs’ counsel, who had authority to bind Morales, accepted defendants’ offer *(see Kowalchuk v*Stroup, 61 AD3d 118, 122 [1st Dept 2009]). Furthermore, counsel typed his name at the end of the email accepting defendants’ offer, which satisfied CPLR 2104’s requirement that settlement agreements be in a “writing subscribed by him or his attorney” in order to be enforceable (CPLR 2104; see *Forcelli v Gelco Corp.,*109 AD3d 244, 251 [2d Dept 2013]; *Newmark & Co. Real Estate Inc. v 2615 E. 17 St. Realty LLC,*80 AD3d 476, 477 [1st Dept 2011]; *Stevens v Publicis S.A.,*50 AD3d 253, 255-256 [1st Dept 2008], *lv dismissed*10 NY3d 930 [2008], citing *Rosenfeld v Zerneck,*4 Misc 3d 193, 195 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2004]), thus creating a binding settlement agreement.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Webber, Kahn and Kern, JJ.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.1

DESCRIPTION OF ANNUAL SUPPORT CENTER AND FIELD MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN


     Under our Annual Support Center and Field Management Bonus Plan, which is
an unwritten plan, our Vice Presidents, Senior Directors and Directors, Director
of Operations, Regional Human Resources Managers, Regional Training Managers and
District Managers are eligible to receive cash bonuses ranging from 10% to 50%
of base compensation each year. The total amount of bonus paid is based (1) 50%
on the achievement of a certain corporate performance goal and (2) 50% on the
individual participant's performance as compared to pre-determined goals and
objectives. Each fiscal year, our board of directors sets the performance goal
for this plan to be achieved. After the completion of a fiscal year, the board
of directors certifies whether the performance goal has been met and awards
bonuses. No bonuses are paid if we do not meet the corporate performance goal.
Except for our Vice President of Global Franchising and Vice President of
Business Development and Commercial Sales, our board of directors has set a
corporate performance goal of achieving a set level of Adjusted EBITDA for each
year. For our Vice President of Global Franchising and Vice President of
Business Development and Commercial Sales, our board has set a corporate
performance goal of achieving a set level of sales for each year.