alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1732

 To extend arbitration under the provisions of chapter 44 of title 28, 
              United States Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

    Mr. Heflin introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend arbitration under the provisions of chapter 44 of title 28, 
              United States Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ARBITRATION.

    (a) Amendment of Repeal.--Section 906 of the Judicial Improvements 
and Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 651 note; Public Law 100-702; 102 
Stat. 4664) is amended in the first sentence by striking out ``5 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act'' and inserting in lieu 
thereof ``December 31, 1994''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 905 of the Judicial 
Improvements and Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 651 note; Public Law 
100-702; 102 Stat. 4664) is amended in the first sentence by striking 
out ``4'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``7''.

                                 <all>
```
# L_2010264EN.01001501.xml

| 7.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 264/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 264/15

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 1 October 2010

appointing one German member of the Committee of the Regions

(2010/600/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1).

1

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of mandate of Mr Wolfgang GIBOWSKI, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of mandate of Mr Wolfgang GIBOWSKI,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as a member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Dr Martina KROGMANN

  Staatssekretärin


  Bevollmächtigte des Landes Niedersachsen beim Bund |
| --- | --- |

—

Dr Martina KROGMANN

Staatssekretärin

Staatssekretärin

Bevollmächtigte des Landes Niedersachsen beim Bund

Bevollmächtigte des Landes Niedersachsen beim Bund

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2010.

For the Council

The President

S. VANACKERE

---

(1)  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22 and OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

1

---
Related Links

Oil & Gas Code Definitions

Code Type: Well Type Get List

Select code type and click on "Get List"

Well Status Definitions

Code Definition

A Active

AB Abandoned (Shut-In > 12 Months)

DRL Drilling

DRY Dry Hole

EXP Expired Permit

IA Inactive (Shut-In >= 3 and <= 12 Months)

LOC Permitted Location to Drill

PA Plugged and Abandoned

PNC Permit Now Cancelled

PNS Permit Now Suspended

TA Temporarily Abandoned

TAO Temporarily Abandoned - Observation

[DMR Home] [Disclaimer] [Privacy] [Security] [Feedback]

Well Search

NDIC Oil & Gas Code Help Index Page 1 of 1

https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/codehelp.asp 2/4/2013
From: Kirby, Nathan J.

To: Brent Ruminski

Cc: Ritter, Alison M.

Subject: RE: Data Use Agreement for NDIC Subscription

Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:05:19 PM

Brent,

Per our disclaimer at https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/disclaimer.asp . We as an agency hold no

ownership of the data, it is provided as is and free to use. The only cost is with the subscription to

access it electronically.

Thanks

Nathan

Nathan J. Kirby

Database Design Analyst II

NDIC Oil and Gas Division

701-328-8020

From: Brent Ruminski [mailto:Brent.Ruminski@erg.com] 

Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:18 AM

To: Kirby, Nathan J.

Subject: Data Use Agreement for NDIC Subscription

Hi Nathan,

My name is Brent Ruminski, an engineer at Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). I just spoke with one

of your colleagues named Allison and she provided me your contact information. For background

information, my company is under contract with the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) and we had a “basic subscription” service that recently expired.

The reason I am contacting you is we currently have a unique situation where we performed several

analyses using data obtained through our “basic subscription” with NDIC. We performed these

analyses to support an EPA rulemaking. Part of the rulemaking process requires EPA to release as

much their analyses and raw data to the public as possible with the exceptions of copyrighted data.

After reviewing the agreement and your website, I do not see any copyright claims or data use

agreement. Can you please confirm that the raw data obtained through the “basic subscription” with

NDIC is not copyrighted and that NDIC does not object to EPA publishing this raw data electronically

on regulations.gov. Of course, full citation to NDIC will be provided with the data.

I provided the specific data we used in the attachment (I deleted most rows to minimize file size).

We also recorded monthly production numbers using the subscription service which would also be

published.

Please let me know If you would like to set up a call to discuss further or need any other

information.

Thank you,

Brent Ruminski

Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG)

14555 Avion Parkway Suite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151

703-633-1701 (office)
#### Waite, Matter of, v Town of Champion

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1634

granted
#### Com. v. Morris

03/23/2016

877 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 96
March 1, 2013

No. 12-854.

#### Richter *v.*Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Merck & Co., Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2005
    
    /s/ Richard T. ClarkName:
    
    Richard T. ClarkTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
#### Rosie Gorman, Respondent, v Manuel Ochoa et al., Appellants.

[768 NYS2d 364]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated September 11, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was to compel the plaintiff to undergo an examination by a vocational rehabilitation specialist, and (2) an order of the same court dated May 9, 2003, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

It is well settled that the supervision of disclosure is generally left to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see Palermo Mason Constr. v Aark Holding Corp.,*300 AD2d 460, 461 [2002]). Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to compel the plaintiff to undergo an examination by a vocational rehabilitation expert *(see Kavanagh v Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.,*92 NY2d 952 [1998]).

It is also well settled that a motion for leave to renew must be supported by new or additional facts “not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination,” and “shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2], [3]; *see Rizzotto v Allstate Ins. Co.,*300 AD2d 562 [2002]; *Williams v Fitzsimmons,*295 AD2d 342 [2002]). Here, the so-called new facts tendered by the defendants were either not new or they would not have changed the outcome. In addition, the defendants failed to offer *583a reasonable justification for failing to tender the facts with their original motion. Accordingly, it was a provident exercise of discretion to deny the motion for leave to renew. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT        32.01**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.        SECTION 1350,

AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In        connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on        Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Steiner, Principal        Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my        knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

         

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in                        all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                        the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

         

May 12, 2008

|  

                      | /s/ Michael S.                    Steiner                                             Michael S. Steiner                    Principal Executive Officer |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

                                                                                              

 

22
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | --     | 14.85  | --     | 15.12  | --     | --     | --     | --    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

126 A.3d 1281-1286

#### Begley v. Rhoads & Sinon LLP

10/29/2015

467 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 1049
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies that the annual report on Form 10-K of Ascend
Acquisition Corp. (“the Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Registrant.




Dated:
March 31, 2009





/s/
      Don K. RiceDon
      K. RiceChairman
      of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer,
      President and Treasurer
                        (Principal
      executiveand
      financial
                        officer)
No. 12-991.

#### Habyarimana, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of the Deceased President of Rwanda, Habyarimana, et al. *v.*Kagame, President of the Republic of Rwanda.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 12.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Yuan Chun Tang, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corporation Limited;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a)
        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)
        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c)
        Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)
        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and






---





b)
        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
        November 5, 2007




/s/ Yuan Chun TangYuan Chun TangChief Executive Officer






---
From: "J. Rex Hewitt" <rexhewitt@petrogas.org>

To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/15/2010 10:16 AM

Subject: Re: Marine vessel loading control systems

Sorry I did not get back with you sooner. 

On your question about the crude oil, all the systems they are all able to recover propane+ 

vapors. They also can capture some of the methane and ethane. Crude oil, like diesel, 

does not emit much vapors. The vapors it does emit can be captured. The methane and 

ethane are normally flashed off at the well location so there there will not be much 

flashing off of these at storage terminals. 

The payout on the crude loading is much longer since it does not contain much vapors. 

On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Shine.Brenda@epamail.epa.gov wrote: 

Rex,

Thanks again for talking with me earlier today. 

I wanted to run my notes from our conversation back to you to make sure I accurately 

captured our discussion, since we may be using this information in our upcoming risk and 

technology review for the marine vessel loading rule. 

You provided me with some equipment costs for refrigerated lean oil absorption systems 

for typical loading rates. 

These are as follows:

5,000 gallons/minute (typical loading rate for barges)-- $ 650,000

15,000 gallons/minute (typical loading rate for ships)- $1,200,000

If the systems are located within 2000 feet of water, additional safety systems that are 

required by the U.S. Coast Guard could increase the costs at a minimum of $250,000 to a 

doubling of the costs.

Since these are equipment costs, could you also estimate installation costs for these 

systems?
I asked about operation and maintenance costs-- operating costs are limited to electricity, 

and you estimated $0.006/gallon material loaded. 

You also mentioned that vessel retrofits are typically no longer needed as most barges 

and ships are already capture-ready. 

For gasoline loading, and considering recovery credit, installation of one of these systems 

can have a pay back period of 1 to 2 years. 

The systems are able to meet state MVL loading requirements ranging from 1 to 30 

mg/liter product loaded-- or 99% of vapors recovered for typical gasoline blends. I 

assume these systems can also be used to control vapors from crude oil loading as well. 

Any information on the effectiveness of your system for crude oil loading would also be 

useful.

Please let me know if you have any comments, additional information, or any other 

questions and thanks again for your time.

Brenda Shine

Environmental Engineer

US Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-3608, Mail Drop E143-01
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29717-29718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14287]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Garbage Discharges for Navy Ships in MARPOL Annex V 
Special Areas

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense must report annually on the amount 
and nature of garbage discharges from Navy ships operating in special 
areas, when such discharges are not otherwise authorized under the Act 
to Prevent Pollution from Ships (APPS), 33 U.S.C. 1901, et seq. This 
notice is the fourth annual report.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Louis Maiuri, Office of the Chief 
of Naval Operations Environmental Protection, Safety and Occupational 
Health Division, Crystal Plaza #5, Room 654, 2211 South Clark Place, 
Arlington, Virginia, 22244-5108, telephone 703-602-2602.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The International Convention on the 
Prevention of Pollution from ships (MARPOL) as amended by the MARPOL 
Protocol of 1978, protects the ocean environment by prohibiting some 
discharges altogether, restricting other

[[Page 29718]]

discharges to particular distances from land, and establishing 'special 
areas' within which additional discharge limitations apply. Special 
areas are particular bodies of water which, because of their 
oceanographic characteristics and ecological significance, require 
protective measures more strict than other areas of the ocean. Within 
special areas that are in effect internationally, except under 
emergency circumstances the only authorized garbage discharge from 
vessels is food waste. At present, three special areas are in effect: 
the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, and the Antarctic Region.
    The Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships established deadlines for 
compliance by U.S. Navy ships with the Annex V special area 
requirements. Surface ships must comply with the special area 
requirements by December 31st of the year 2000. Submarines must comply 
with the special area requirements by December 31st of the year 2008. 
APPS further requires the Secretary of Defense to report in the Federal 
Register the amount and nature of Navy ship discharges in special 
areas, not otherwise authorized under MARPOL ANNEX V.
    This Federal Register notice is the fourth of the required annual 
reports. This report covers the period between 1 August 1996 and 31 
July 1997. The end date of July 31st is necessary to allow time for 
data collection and report preparation. During the period 1 August 1996 
through 31 July 1997 there were no garbage discharges from Navy ships 
into MARPOL Annex V special areas that were not authorized under MARPOL 
Annex V.

    Dated: May 18, 1998.
Lou Rae Langevin,
LT, JAGC, USN, Alternate Federal Register, Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14287 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
No. 12-7468.

#### Lewis *v.*Uttecht, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.