alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1896

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PVC rain slickers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. D’AMATO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PVC rain

slickers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN PVC RAIN

4 SLICKERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new subheading:
2

•S 1896 IS

‘‘ 9902.39.20 Plastic rainwear, including

jackets, coats, ponchos,

parkas, and slickers; featuring an outer shell of polyvinyl chloride plastic with

or without attached hoods,

valued not over $10 per

unit (provided for in subheading 3926.20.50) .......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/98 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16420]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, July 10, 2013, 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE:  Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS:  Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matters To Be Considered: 
Hearing: Agenda and Priorities for Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015

    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live. 
For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call 
(301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: July 2, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-16420 Filed 7-3-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Portal, ND Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Portal, ND Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Hussey v. Say

CAAP-13-0002225

05/12/2014

Denied

133 Hawai'i 229, 325 P.3d 641
No. 12-8218.

#### Albrecht *v.*Butts, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit      10(a)**

**AMENDMENT      TO AGREEMENT **

**THIS      AMENDMENT**

*provided*
*however*

*provided*
*however*

----

----

**IN      WITNESS WHEREOF**

| **ALLTEL              CORPORATION**    |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| By:              /s/ Richard N. Massey |
|                                   |
|                                   |
| **EXECUTIVE**:                    |
| /s/              Joe T. Ford      |
| Joe T.              Ford          |
#### In the Matter of Cory Reid, Petitioner, v Katherine Bajuile et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 854]

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Concur—Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Omix Serrano, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 631]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Benitez, J.), rendered May 15, 2015, as amended June 4, 2015, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted rape in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years, unanimously affirmed.

*603Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see *People v Bryant,*28 NY3d 1094 [2016]), which forecloses review of his claim that his sentencing was procedurally deficient. Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver, defendant did not preserve his claim that the sentencing court should have asked him if he had opportunity to read the presentence report, if he had discussed it with counsel, and if he wanted to' challenge any facts stated in the report. Furthermore, we decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The sentencing was conducted in full accordance with the Criminal Procedure Law, which provides a defendant with ample opportunity to refute a presentence report, and the court was under no obligation to import additional sentencing procedures from another jurisdiction.

Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.
**Exhibit32**

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, the Corporate Trustee ofMesabi Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge, the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended July 31, 2004 (the “Amended Quarterly Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Amended QuarterlyReport fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Mesabi Trust.

 
| /s/ Rodney Gaughan                   |   | January 21, 2005 |
|--------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
| Rodney Gaughan*                      |   |
| Assistant Vice President             |   |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |   |

 

----

* There are no principal executive officers or principal financialofficers of the registrant.

 

----
No. 12-7967.

#### Pate *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 5th Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
Effects of Pyrethroids on Human Sodium 

Channels Co-Expressed with β1 and β2 

Subunits

Project Completed By: 

ChanTest Corporation

14656 Neo Parkway

Cleveland, OH 44128

Project Presented By:

Steven B. Symington, PhD

Department of Biology and Biomedical Science

Salve Regina University,

Newport, RI 02840 

Project Funded By: 

The Council for the Advancement 

of Pyrethroid Human Risk Assessment 

(CAPHRA)
Assay in the Context of the Adverse 

Outcome Pathway (AOP)

Expression of Human Nav

isoforms in HEK cells
Relationship of Nav isoforms 

Soderlund, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 2010

Catterall et al., Pharmacol. Rev., 2005
Human Rat

Nav isoforms Expression Changes 

During Development 

Nav1.2

Nav1.1

Nav1.3

Cheah et al., Channels, 2013 Beckh et al., J EMBO. 1989
Electrophysiology Method

HEK Cells Human Nav isoform

+β1β2 Subunits

Electroporate

Plate human Nav isoform 

expressing cells for 

Automated electrophysiology

Determine Control Responses

Determine Pyrethroid Responses

IonWorks Barracuda Automated 

Electrophysiology

5 Min Incubation

Overnight Incubation
Resting Conditions: Data collected after 

the first pulse (TP1)

Use-dependent Conditions: Data collected 

on the 20th test pulse (TP20)

Late Current Ratio between the current measured 

during depolarization and the maximum inward 

(peak) current determined (Ilate/Ipeak)

Tail Current Ratio between the current measured 

after repolarization and the maximum inward (peak) 

current determined (Itail/Ipeak)

Variables Measured

Test Pulse 1 Test Pulse 20

Resting Conditions Use-dependent Conditions

Ilate / Ipeak

Current (nA)

Current (nA)

Itail / 

Ipeak
Maximal Response

(efficacy)

Use-Dependent Tail Current is the Most Robust 

Response to Assess Pyrethroid Effects on Human 

Nav Isoforms

EC50 (potency)
Use-Dependent Tail Current is the Most Robust 

Response to Assess Pyrethroid Effects on Human 

Nav Isoforms

Nav1.3 and Nav1.6 showed the Highest Maximum 

Response of the Pyrethroids that Affected Human 

VSSC isoforms
Conclusions

• Cypermethrin, bifenthrin, and permethrin had no

effects on Human Nav tail currents

• Esfenvalerate and deltamethrin had weak effects

on Nav1.3 and Nav1.2 tail currents

• The Nav1.3 and Nav1.6 isoforms were the most

effected by the pyrethroids that acted on human

VSSC isoforms (Allethrin, Prallethrin, Pyrethrum,

and Tefluthrin)
END
EXHIBIT
      23.1





[DELOITTE
      TOUCHE TOHMATSU LETTERHEAD]











CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
      333-13320, No. 333-10312, and 333-132736 of Highway Holdings Limited on Form
      S-8
      of our report dated June 2, 2006, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F
      of
      Highway Holdings Limited for the year ended March 31, 2006.














/s/
      Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu











Hong
      Kong


June
      29,
      2006
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1631

To amend the Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act of

1989, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To amend the Everglades National Park Protection and

Expansion Act of 1989, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACQUISITION.

4 Section 104 of the Everglades National Park Protec5 tion and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r–8) is

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section:

8 ‘‘(k)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

9 Act, the Secretary is authorized to use funds appropriated

10 pursuant to this Act, including any available funds appro-
2

S 1631 IS

1 priated to the National Park Service for construction in

2 the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Ap3 propriations Acts for fiscal years 1991 through 1994 for

4 project modifications by the Army Corps of Engineers, in

5 such amounts as determined by the Secretary, to provide

6 Federal assistance to the State of Florida (including polit7 ical subdivisions of the State) for acquisition of lands de8 scribed in paragraph (4).

9 ‘‘(2) With respect to any lands acquired pursuant to

10 this subsection, the Secretary may provide not more than

11 25 percent of the total cost of such acquisition.

12 ‘‘(3) All funds made available pursuant to this sub13 section shall be transferred to the State of Florida or a

14 political subdivision of the State, subject to an agreement

15 that any lands acquired with such funds will be managed

16 in perpetuity for the restoration of natural flows to the

17 Park or Florida Bay.

18 ‘‘(4) The lands referred to in paragraph (1) are those

19 lands or interests therein adjacent to, or affecting the res20 toration of natural water flows to the Park or Florida Bay

21 which are located east of the Park and known as the Frog

22 Pond, the Rocky Glades Agricultural Area, and the Eight23 and-One-Half Square-Mile Area.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-030-08-1010-00-1784]


Southwest Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice; Resource Advisory Council Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 USC), 
notice is hereby given that the Southwest Resource Advisory Council 
(Southwest RAC) will meet in Montrose, Colorado.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, June 18, 1998.

ADDRESSES: For additional information, contact Roger Alexander, Bureau 
of Land Management (BLM), Montrose District Office, 2465 South Townsend 
Avenue, Montrose, Colorado 81401; telephone 970-240-5335; TDD 970-240-
5366; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#324000535e574a535c72515d1c505e5f1c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e99bdb88858c918887a98a86c78b8584c78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The June 18, 1998, meeting will begin at 
9:00 a.m. in the BLM Montrose District Office Conference Room, 2465 
South Townsend, Montrose, Colorado. The agenda will focus on 
development of recreation guidelines and a request from the National 
Mustang Association-Spring Creek Basin Herd Account. Time will be 
provided for public comments at 9:30 am.
    All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council, or written 
statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. If 
necessary, a per-person time limit may be established by the Montrose 
District Manager.
    Summary minutes for Council meetings are maintained in the Montrose 
District Office and on the World Wide Web at <a href="http://www.co.blm.gov/mdo/
mdo__sw___rac.htm">http://www.co.blm.gov/mdo/
mdo__sw___rac.htm</a> and are available for public inspection and 
reproduction within thirty (30) days following each meeting.

    Dated: May 28, 1998.
Roger Alexander,
Public Affairs Specialist.
[FR Doc. 98-14649 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Cornelius v. Menio

10/14/2015

122 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 113 A.3d 344
VI

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1912

For the relief of Ethel M. Roberts of Newark, Ohio.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. GLENN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

For the relief of Ethel M. Roberts of Newark, Ohio.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. (a) Notwithstanding section

4 8341(h)(3)(B) or any other provision of chapter 83 of title

5 5, United States Code, in the administration of such chap6 ter the marriage of Hoyt J. Roberts and Ethel M. Roberts

7 (formerly Ethel Maxine Smith) of Newark, Ohio on July

8 15, 1989, shall be deemed to be null abnitio, and Ethel

9 M. Roberts shall be entitled to a former spouse annuity

10 based upon her marriage to Hoyt J. Roberts on May 14,

11 1950 and the election of such former spouse annuity by

12 Hoyt J. Roberts on January 1, 1988.
2

•S 1912 IS

1 (b) The provisions of subsection (a) may not be con2 strued to effect the application of any other Federal,

3 State, or local law with regard to the marriage of Hoyt

4 J. Roberts and Ethel M. Roberts on July 15, 1989.

5 (c) The provisions of this subsection shall be effective

6 on and after July 15, 1989.

7 SEC. 2. Nothing in this Act may be construed as an

8 inference of liability on the part of the United States.

Æ
No. 12-276.

#### New Mexico *v.*Herring.

Sup. Ct. N. M. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Francisco L. Camara, Respondent, v Skanska, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[55 NYS3d 27]

Order, Supreme Court New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered February 24, 2016, which, to the extent appeal-able, granted petitioner’s application for pre-action disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c), unanimously modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, to delete paragraphs 3 and 4 of the order, which provide for a deposition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*549Although respondents have already largely complied with petitioner’s pre-action disclosure requests, respondents still have an ongoing obligation to “amend or supplement” their responses (CPLR 3101 [h]), and the order imposes additional outstanding disclosure obligations. Accordingly, the order has potential continuing practical consequences to respondents and their appeal is not moot *(see Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki,*100 NY2d 801, 811-812 [2003], *cert denied*540 US 1017 [2003]; *Saratoga Harness Racing v Roemer,*290 AD2d 928, 928, 929 n [3d Dept 2002]).

The court properly exercised its discretion in directing pre-action disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3102 (c). Petitioner, a construction laborer who, while working for respondents, was injured while extracting a pin from a concrete roadblock, established that he likely has a meritorious products liability claim against the pin’s manufacturer, and further showed that the limited information sought, which included information that would identify the defendant manufacturer, was material and necessary to the actionable wrong *(see Holzman v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*271 AD2d 346, 347 [1st Dept 2000]; *Matter of Uddin v New York City Tr. Auth.,*27 AD3d 265 [1st Dept 2006]; *Matter of Stump v 209 E. 56th St. Corp.,*212 AD2d 410 [1st Dept 1995]). However, the order granting the petition exceeded the scope of the information sought, as it required respondents to furnish a witness with specific knowledge of the accident site for a deposition. As petitioner did not request and shows no need for such disclosure in order to frame a complaint, the order is modified to the extent indicated *(see Matter of Verdon v New York City Tr. Auth.,*92 AD2d 465 [1st Dept 1983]).

Concur-—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert A. Ness, Controller (Principal Financial Officer) of MetropolitanMortgage & Securities Co., Inc., certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metropolitan Mortgage& Securities Co., Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; and
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 14, 2003   /s/ Robert A. NessRobert A. NessController (Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Pastore, Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 863]

An appeal having been taken to this. Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), rendered February 6, 2014, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.