alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         129,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  156,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               302,856
<PP&E>                                      10,370,105
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,697,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,975,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          465,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       811,644
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,301,505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,975,824
<SALES>                                      1,155,638
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,165,921
<CGS>                                          523,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  523,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,128,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             115,980
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (486,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (486,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (486,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
        

</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1641

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel INSPIRATION.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

INSPIRATION.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel INSPIRATION, United States official num9 ber 277099.

Æ
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|California Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|California Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 10,180 | 10,180 | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-811.

#### Airservices Australia *v.*Conklin, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, Greene County, et al.

Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1896 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1896

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PVC rain slickers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 7 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

  Mr. D'Amato introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain PVC rain slickers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN PVC RAIN SLICKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new subheading:
    

       ``  9902.39.20   Plastic rainwear, including              No change      No change      On or before     
                         jackets, coats, ponchos,                                               12/31/98        
                         parkas, and slickers;                                                                  
                         featuring an outer shell of                                                            
                         polyvinyl chloride plastic                                                             
                         with or without attached                                                               
                         hoods, valued not over $10                                                             
                         per unit (provided for in                                                              
                         subheading 3926.20.50)......  Free                                                     
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5879 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5879

**Commission Decision of 09/11/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5879 - ALSTOM / RZD / CYPRIOT COMPANIES / TMH) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 09.11.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/17853, 17854, 17855, 17856, 17857

C(2010) 7881

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5879 - ALSTOM/ RZD/ CYPRIOT COMPANIES/ TMH Notification of 01.10.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 278, 15.10.2010 p.23

1. On 01.10.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Alstom Holdings ("Alstom", France), Russian Railways ("RZD", Russia), and certain Cypriot companies (Ammonis Trading Limited, Latorio Holdings Limited and Mafrido Trading Limited, together "the Cypriot Companies", Cyprus) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of CJSC Transmashholding ("TMH", Russia) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Alstom: group of companies active world-wide mainly in the manufacture of equipment and the provision of services for power generation, power transmission, and rail transport.

- for RZD: state-owned railway company and rail operator in Russia and in certain CIS states.

- for the Cypriot Companies: financial investment companies whose activities are limited to indirectly holding shares of TMH.

- for TMH: manufacture and maintenance of locomotives and rail equipment active mainly in Russia and some EEA states.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
#### Com. v. Adams

08/10/2016

137 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 108 A.3d 107
#### People v Jordan

2d Dept: 142 AD3d 596

denied*
[768 NYS2d 17]

#### In the Matter of Juan Roque Angrisani, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

Second Department,

November 24, 2003

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Diana Maxfield Kearse,*Brooklyn *(Melissa D. Broder*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Juan Roque Angrisani,*Bronx, respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

*15On February 24, 2003, the respondent pleaded guilty in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3) (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 [1] [c] [i]). On April 7, 2003, he was sentenced to five years’ probation.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), a person ceases to be an attorney upon conviction of a felony. By virtue of his felony conviction, the respondent was automatically disbarred. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law is granted, effective immediately, and the respondent’s cross motion for an adjournment to retain counsel is denied.

Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Altman, Florio and Cozier JJ., concur.

Ordered that the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Juan Roque Angrisani, is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys *(see*22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, Juan Roque Angrisani is commanded to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-6


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:        November 13, 2002                      /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR
                                              ---------------------------------
                                                       David E. Meador
                                                  Senior Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer of
                                              Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
No. 12-7619.

#### Harvey *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  215,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,912
<INVENTORY>                                     96,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,581
<PP&E>                                       2,845,717
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,377,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,108,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          492,052
<BONDS>                                        621,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,108,058
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               724,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,703
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 70,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,627
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Fueling interoperability with Peru Navy

/ Published May 20, 2019

Expanding its 38 fuel agreements across the world, Defense Logistics Agency Energy signed a new Fuel Implementing Arrangement with the Peru Navy to improve interoperability between the U.S. and Peruvian Navies.

DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Albert Miller and Peruvian Navy Rear Adm. Jorge Zegarra, Peru Naval Attaché to the United States, held the signing ceremony at the McNamara Headquarters Complex, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, May 14.

“DLA Energy prides itself on understanding customer requirements and anticipating future needs to ensure Warfighters have reliable and efficient fuel sources across an increasingly complex global environment,” Miller said.

DLA Energy International Agreements led by David Alexander, within the Bulk Petroleum Supply Chain Services, is responsible for the execution and oversight of agreement activity. Each fuel exchange agreement is unique and tailored to the needs of the customer. 

“The new agreement expands the scope of support and authorizes all product types both on land and at sea,” said Michael Holgate, DLA Energy lead negotiator for the U.S. Southern Command region. “It will allow for better interoperability between the U.S. and Peruvian Navies and is essential to support major combined exercises such as RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) and UNITAS.”  

Holgate and Roberto Botteri, assistant to the Naval Attaché, led the effort for their respective country and gained final approval to update fuel support capabilities under this new agreement.  

“Signing the fuel agreement culminates 22 months of effort between Peru Naval Attaché office and DLA Energy,” Miller said. “I want to thank the teams for their hard work and dedication to improving our joint partnership.” 

Zegarra said he was happy to attend the ceremony and represent his country and the Peruvian Navy. He plans to bring the agreement back to his leadership as an example for establishing the same type of agreement with the Peru Air Force.

“It is an honor for me to be here,” he said. “I think the direct contacts between authorities strengthens the trust and friendship between our institutions.”

The Fuel Implementing Arrangement is under Acquisition and Cross-Service Agreement authority and updates a prior fuel agreement with the Peru Navy dated Dec 18, 2007. ASCAs are applicable worldwide to acquire logistics support, supplies, and services directly from or provide them to a foreign government organization. Providing international fuel support under ACSA supports Department of Defense policy, helps standardize fuel agreements and produces operational consistency amongst partnering nations. 

The newly assigned International Agreements position at DLA Energy Americas office in Houston will be responsible for the day-to-day management of the fuel U.S. and Peruvian Fuel Implementing Arrangement.
# L_2011093EN.01000101.xml

| 7.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 March 2011

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faeroe Islands on scientific and technological cooperation, associating the Faeroe Islands to the Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)

(2011/218/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 186, in conjunction with point (v) of Article 218(6)(a), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Union, an Agreement with the Government of the Faeroe Islands on scientific and technological cooperation associating the Faeroe Islands to the Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Commission has negotiated, on behalf of the Union, an Agreement with the Government of the Faeroe Islands on scientific and technological cooperation associating the Faeroe Islands to the Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’).

| (2) | The Agreement was signed by the representatives of the Parties on 3 June 2010 in Brussels, and was made provisionally applicable as from 1 January 2010, pending its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement was signed by the representatives of the Parties on 3 June 2010 in Brussels, and was made provisionally applicable as from 1 January 2010, pending its conclusion at a later date.

| (3) | The Agreement should be concluded on behalf of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be concluded on behalf of the Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Faeroe Islands on scientific and technological cooperation associating the Faeroe Islands to the Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (1).

Article 2

The Commission shall adopt the position to be taken by the Union in the Joint Committee established by Article 4(1) of the Agreement.

Article 3

The President of the Council, on behalf of the Union, shall make the notification provided for in Article 5(2) of the Agreement.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 2011.

For the Council

The President

CSÉFALVAY Z.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 245, 17.9.2010, p. 2.

1

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134920 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134920 

 COA: 278848 

Genesee CC: 06-017930-FC 

FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT FULTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk