alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
  MERRILL
    LYNCH & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
    COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND
    COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
  For theThree Months

For the SixEnded

Months Ended

Year Ended Last Friday in DecemberJune 27,

June 27,

2007

2006

2005

2004

20032008

2008

(52 weeks)

(52 weeks)

(52 weeks)

(53 weeks)

(52 weeks)Pre-tax
    (loss)/earnings(a)

$
(7,979
)

$
(11,413
)

$
(13,723
)

$
9,313


$
6,335


$
5,106


$
4,894Add: Fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest and preferred
    security dividend requirements of subsidiaries)


8,246



18,068



51,683



35,719



21,764



10,591



8,016Pre-tax earnings before fixed charges


267



6,655



37,960



45,032



28,099



15,697



12,910Fixed charges:Interest


8,172



17,924



51,425



35,499



21,549



10,387



7,823Other(b)


74



144



258



220



215



204



193Total fixed charges


8,246



18,068



51,683



35,719



21,764



10,591



8,016Preferred stock dividend requirements


415



711



401



259



99



54



52Total combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

$
8,661


$
18,779


$
52,084


$
35,978


$
21,863


$
10,645


$
8,068Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


*



*



*



1.26



1.29



1.48



1.61Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
    stock dividends


*



*



*



1.25



1.29



1.47



1.60  (a)
    
    Excludes undistributed
    (loss)/earnings from equity investments and earnings from
    discontinued operations.(b)
    
    Other fixed charges consist of
    the interest factor in rentals, amortization of debt issuance
    costs, preferred security dividend requirements of subsidiaries,
    and capitalized interest.*
    
    The earnings for the three- and
    six-months periods ended June 27, 2008, and for the year
    ended 2007 were inadequate to cover total fixed charges and
    total fixed charges and preferred stock dividends. The coverage
    deficiencies for total fixed charges for the three- and
    six-months periods ended June 27, 2008, and for the year
    ended 2007 were $7,979, $11,413 and 13,723 respectively. The
    coverage deficiencies for total fixed charges and preferred
    stock dividends for the three- and six-months periods ended
    June 27, 2008, and for the year ended 2007 were $8,394,
    $12,124 and 14,124 respectively.
#### Chatham Towers, Inc., Plaintiff, v Castle Restoration *&*Construction, Inc., et al., Defendants. Castle Restoration *420& Construction, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v JPI Construction & Management Services, Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants, and Howard L. Zimmerman Architect P.C., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[56 NYS3d 74]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered March 10, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted third-party defendant Howard L. Zimmerman Architect P.C.’s (Zimmerman) motion to dismiss defendant-third-party plaintiff Castle Restoration & Construction, Inc.’s (Castle) common-law claims against it for contribution and indemnification, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly dismissed Castle’s common-law contribution claim against Zimmerman. Although Castle attempted to cast plaintiff Chatham Towers, Inc.’s (Chatham) claims, as set forth in the underlying complaint, as sounding in tort, the claims were actually all based on alleged breaches of a contract between Chatham and Castle. Thus, because Chatham sought only to enforce the benefit of its bargain with Castle, its damages were for purely economic loss, and does not constitute an injury to property under CPLR 1401, which governs claims for contribution *(see Board of Educ. of Hudson City School Dist. v Sargent, Webster, Crenshaw & Folley,*71 NY2d 21, 26 [1987]; *Structure Tone, Inc. v Universal Servs. Group, Ltd.,*87 AD3d 909, 911 [1st Dept 2011]; *Children’s Corner Learning Ctr. v A. Miranda Contr. Corp.,*64 AD3d 318, 323 [1st Dept 2009]).

In addition, the court also properly dismissed Castle’s common-law indemnification claim. Common-law indemnification may be pursued by parties who have been held vicariously liable for the party that actually caused the negligence that injured the plaintiff *(Naughton v City of New York,*94 AD3d 1, 10 [1st Dept 2012]; *Correia v Professional Data Mgt.,*259 AD2d 60, 65 [1st Dept 1999]). Here, however, there is no common-law indemnification claim because Chatham sought recovery from Castle because of the latter’s alleged wrongdoing — breach of contract — and not vicariously because of any negligence on the part of Zimmerman *(see Structure Tone, Inc.,*87 AD3d at 911-912; *Trump Vil. Section 3 v New York State Hous. Fin. Agency,*307 AD2d 891, 895 [1st Dept 2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 504 [2003]; *Trustees of Columbia Univ. v Mitchell/Giurgola Assoc.,*109 AD2d 449, 453 [1st Dept 1985]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
No. 12-948.

#### Rumburg *v.*McHugh, Secretary of the Army.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 329    | 38,469 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements of Obie Media Corporation which are included in its annual
report,  Form 10-KSB,  for the year ended  November 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Nov-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Nov-30-1997
<CASH>                                 0
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  3,025,052
<ALLOWANCES>                     146,692
<INVENTORY>                            0 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               4,773,834
<PP&E>                        12,716,707
<DEPRECIATION>                 3,451,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                14,284,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          4,127,334
<BONDS>                        6,554,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                       6,173,967
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,378,073)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  14,284,422
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              13,302,826
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  8,004,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 664,207
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0 <F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               584,258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                1,614,375
<INCOME-TAX>                    (614,311)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            1,000,064
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                   1,000,064
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .26
<FN> 
<F1>
Information not included in Financial Statements
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          4,322
<SECURITIES>                                   46,227
<RECEIVABLES>                                   8,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                      347
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               60,314
<PP&E>                                          7,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 64,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,399
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          140
<OTHER-SE>                                     58,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   64,160
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               58,104
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,242
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               18,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (2,645)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (911)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               354
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      354
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.03


</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1699

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the amortization

deduction for goodwill and certain other intangibles be determined by

amortizing 75 percent of the adjusted basis of the intangibles ratably

over a 15-year period.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. SIMON (for himself and Mr. METZENBAUM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the amortization deduction for goodwill and certain

other intangibles be determined by amortizing 75 percent

of the adjusted basis of the intangibles ratably over

a 15-year period.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AMORTIZATION DEDUCTION

4 FOR GOODWILL AND CERTAIN OTHER INTAN5 GIBLES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 197(a) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amortization of good-
2

•S 1699 IS

1 will and certain other intangibles) is amended by inserting

2 ‘‘75 percent of’’ before ‘‘the adjusted basis’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the

5 amendments made by section 13261 of the Revenue Act

6 of 1993.

Æ
No. 12-7436.

#### West *v.*Schofield, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction, et al.

Ct. App. Tenn. Certio-rari denied.
FILED

September 21, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

FOR PUBLICATION

Filed: September 21, 1998

FRANCES BLANCHARD, )

)

PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, )

)

v. ) No. 02S01-9709-CV-00083

)

ARLENE KELLUM, D.D.S., )

)

DEFENDANT/APPELLEE. )

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

Arlene Kellum, D.D.S., Defendant/Appellee, has filed a petition to rehear

this cause pursuant to Tenn. R. App. R. 39 contending that our opinion conflicts

with a principle of law and overlooks a proposition of law.

After due consideration, we conclude that the petition for rehearing should

be and the same is hereby denied at the cost of Defendant/Appellee.

PER CURIAM
No. 12-7921.

#### Mink *v.*Arizona et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Barbara Dzidowska, Respondent, v The Related Companies, L.P., et al., Appellants, and Fujitec America, Inc., Doing Business as Fujitec Serge of New York, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 125]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered January 11, 2016, which to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for spoliation sanctions against defendants-appellants, denied defendants-appellants’ cross motion to sanction plaintiff’s counsel and for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against the Related Companies, L.P. (Related) and 1616 First Company, LLC (First), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly concluded that appellants failed to demonstrate that plaintiff’s counsel violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, CPLR 3101 and 3120 or 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c), warranting sanctions, based on alleged conduct of an investigator.

However, the court properly sanctioned appellants for spoliation of certain videotapes, which they were notified by plaintiff’s counsel to preserve, within days of the accident. Despite this notice, appellants preserved copies of only limited portions of the surveillance tape from one camera and destroyed the footage for the entire relevant period from another camera located in the elevator. Plaintiff showed that the portions of the tape that were recorded over were relevant to whether defendants had notice of elevator malfunctions prior to her accident. The court properly concluded that defendants’ culpable state of mind was evidenced by their failure to comply with plaintiff’s request to preserve this evidence *(see VOOM HD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C.,*93 AD3d 33, 45 [1st Dept 2012]).

*481Related and First failed to establish that they did not own, manage or maintain the building. Their reliance largely on unidentified documents not before the court is insufficient to meet their burden on summary judgment.

Concur — Friedman, J.R, Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
#### People v Burke

3d Dept: 139 AD3d 1268

denied
Exhibit 32.2



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I,  Eunice Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company, certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company



Date: November 18, 2004

/s/ Eunice Campbell

________________________________

Eunice Campbell, Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**§302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Loren L. McFarland,certify that: 

1)      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mentor Corporation;

2)      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report, based on such evaluation; and

c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5)      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  August 9, 2004                                              /s/LOREN L. MCFARLAND                                                                             Loren L. McFarland                                                                              ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer                                                                              (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
No. 12-6950.

#### Starks *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
# L_2011168EN.01001001.xml

| 28.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 168/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 168/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 20 June 2011

appointing two Italian members and two Italian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2011/375/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Sergio CHIAMPARINO and Mr Savino Antonio SANTARELLA. Two alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Luigi MONTANARO and Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Sergio CHIAMPARINO and Mr Savino Antonio SANTARELLA. Two alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Luigi MONTANARO and Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Mr Alessandro COSIMI, Sindaco del Comune di Livorno, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Mr Alessandro COSIMI, Sindaco del Comune di Livorno,

| — | Mr Roberto RUOCCO, Vicesindaco del Comune di Cerignola (FG), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Roberto RUOCCO, Vicesindaco del Comune di Cerignola (FG),

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Ms Laura ARDITO, Consigliere comunale di Arese (MI), |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Ms Laura ARDITO, Consigliere comunale di Arese (MI),

| — | Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI, Sindaco del Comune di Gerace (RC) (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI, Sindaco del Comune di Gerace (RC) (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 June 2011.

For the Council

The President

MATOLCSY Gy.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
ACCEPTED

06-15-00128-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

9/28/2015 3:04:19 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/28/2015 3:04:19 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
No. 12-790.

#### Pfluger *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.