alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1847 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1847

To reduce injuries and deaths caused by accidental firearm shootings by 
                          children and others.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

 Mr. Metzenbaum (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce injuries and deaths caused by accidental firearm shootings by 
                          children and others.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Safety Firearms Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. CHILD-PROOF SAFETY DEVICES.

    (a) Unlawful Act.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(u) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture or import a 
firearm that does not have as an integral part a device or devices 
that--
            ``(1) prevent a child of less than 7 years of age from 
        discharging the firearm by reason of the amount of strength, 
        dexterity, cognitive skill, or other ability required to cause 
        a discharge;
            ``(2) prevent a firearm that has a removable magazine from 
        discharging when the magazine has been removed; and
            ``(3) in the case of a handgun other than a revolver, 
        clearly indicate whether the magazine or chamber contains a 
        round of ammunition.''.
    (b) Penalty.--Section 924(a)(5) of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``or (t)'' and inserting ``(t), or (u)''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 6.75   | 5.75   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 7.80   | 10.78  | 5.52   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Jonathan Charnis, Appellant, v Giselle R. Shohet, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 638]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for false imprisonment, the plaintiff appeals, by permission, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, dated October 31, 2002, which, among other things, modified an order of the Civil Court, Queens County, entered July 10, 2001, so as to grant that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the sixth cause of action as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Appellate Term properly found that the plaintiffs sixth cause of action seeking damages for false imprisonment is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The plaintiffs cause of action alleging false imprisonment accrued on January 17, 2000, when he was released from confinement *(see Roche v Village of Tarrytown,*309 AD2d 842 [2003]; *Avgush v Town of Yorktown,*303 AD2d 340 [2003]; *Matter of Ragland v New York City Hous. Auth.,*201 AD2d 7, 9 [1994]). The action was not commenced until January 18, 2001, when the plaintiff purchased an index number and filed the summons with proof of service in the Civil Court *(see*CPLR 203 [c]; Court of Claims Act § 410 [b]; *Matter of Gershel v Porr,*89 NY2d 327, 330 [1996]; *Lumberman’s Mut. Cas. Co. v Temco Serv. Indus.,*209 AD2d 296 [1994]). Since the action was commenced after expiration of the one-year statute of limitations *(see*CPLR 215 [3]), the Appellate Term correctly determined that the cause of action alleging false imprisonment should have been dismissed.

The plaintiff’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur. *[See*195 Misc 2d 188.]
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) Subpart 237.70, Mortuary Services, and the 
associated clause at DFARS 252.237-7011; OMB Number 0704-0231.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 800.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Response: 800.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 400.
    Needs and Uses: This requirement provides for the collection of 
necessary information from contractors regarding the results of the 
embalming process under contracts for mortuary services. The 
information is used to ensure proper preparation of the body for 
shipment and burial. The clause at DFARS 252.237-7011, Preparation 
History, requires that the contractor submit information describing the 
results of the embalming process on each body prepared for burial under 
a DoD contract.
    Affected Public: Business or Other For-Profit.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Peter N.Weiss.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should sent to Mr. Weiss at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-14179 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Com. v. Durant13

02/02/2016

696 MAL (2015)

13

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 93
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 6.96   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Z.M., In re

08/02/2016

192 EAL (2016)

Denied
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-702

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 2/25/2013

Sample Number: 130656-001 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 08:55 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Trip Blank 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg < 0.5 ng/L 0.50 0.20 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-002 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 08:55 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Field Blank 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg < 0.5 ng/L 0.50 0.20 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-003 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 08:55 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Plant Outfall #001 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 6.2 ng/L 0.50 0.20 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-004 Date Collected: 02/15/2013 10:15 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Plant Outfall #001 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 5.8 ng/L 0.50 0.20 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-005 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 08:30 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 6.2 ng/L 2.0 0.80 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-006 Date Collected: 02/15/2013 09:15 Date Received: 2/15/2013

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 12.2 ng/L 2.0 0.80 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-007 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 08:35 Date Received: 2/15/2013

CPS Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 493 ng/L 40 16 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

Mountaineer Plant, 130656 Page 1 of 2
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 2/25/2013

Sample Number: 130656-008 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 10:00 Date Received: 2/15/2013

 CPS Influent

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 254000 ng/L 5000 2000 TLT 02/22/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-009 Date Collected: 02/13/2013 10:00 Date Received: 2/15/2013

 CPS Influent Dissolved

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg 21.1 ng/L 10 4.0 TLT 02/22/2013 EPA 1631E

Sample Number: 130656-010 Date Collected: 02/15/2013 Date Received: 2/15/2013

 Filter Blank

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Mercury, Hg < 0.5 ng/L 0.50 0.20 JAB 02/19/2013 EPA 1631E

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 130656 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000065195
<NAME>                        Mestek, Inc.                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,179
<INVENTORY>                                     54,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,604 
<PP&E>                                          93,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           479
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,393
<SALES>                                         87,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,013
<CGS>                                           62,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    73
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 429
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        


</TABLE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 154

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 12-7906.

#### Stancle *v.*Clay, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Decided June 8, 2017

#### Brady J.C., Matter of (Damaris F.R.)

4th Dept: 148 AD3d 1691

denied*

*

 Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic or denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2687 California]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Availability of Draft 
Environmental Assessment

May 27, 1998.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission's) 
regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for relicensing of 
the Pit 1 Project, located in the towns of Fall River Mills and 
McArthur, California, and has prepared a draft Environmental Assessment 
(DEA) for the project. In the DEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed 
the potential environmental impacts of the existing project and has 
concluded that approval of the project, with appropriate environmental 
protection measures, would not constitute a major federal action 
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2-A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to David P. Boergers, Acting Secretary, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Room 2-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Pit 1 Project No. 2687'' to all 
comments. For further information, please contact Michael Henry at 
(503) 326-5858, ext. 224.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14482 Filed 6-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Daniel R. Wotman & Associates, PLLC, Respondent, v Janet Chang, Appellant.

[50 NYS3d 64]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered December 23, 2015, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s counterclaim for legal malpractice and denied defendant’s cross motion to amend her counterclaim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action commenced by plaintiff to recover legal fees, defendant asserted a counterclaim for legal malpractice. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment dismissing that counter-claim and in response, defendant cross-moved for leave to amend the counterclaim to expand and alter her theory of recovery.

Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant leave to amend her legal malpractice counterclaim. The motion for leave to amend came years after the *572counterclaim was first asserted and well after the conclusion of discovery. Moreover, defendant failed to articulate a reasonable excuse for her delay in amending the counterclaim and was unquestionably in possession of all the facts she needed to seek leave at an earlier time in the litigation *(see Holliday v Hudson Armored Car & Courier Serv.,*301 AD2d 392 [1st Dept 2003], *lv dismissed, lv denied*100 NY2d 636 [2003]).

The motion court also properly granted plaintiff summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim. Defendant’s proof failed to demonstrate that plaintiff was negligent in any way (Brooks *v Lewin,*21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 713 [2006]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Mazzarelli, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.
#### Krichmar, In re Estate of; Krichmar, In re; Spigler, In re

08/02/2016

94-95 EAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 646
No. 12-7753.

#### Calimlim *v.*Office of Personnel Management.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.