alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joan Vasquez, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 402]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered June 26, 2007, as amended May 9, 2013, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims are unreviewable on direct appeal because they involve matters not reflected in, or fully explained by, the record, relating to counsel’s strategy, preparation and thought processes *(see People v Rivera,*71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; *People v Love,*57 NY2d 998 [1982]), and we reject defendant’s argument that trial counsel’s ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record. Although defendant made a CPL 440.10 motion claiming ineffectiveness, the motion was based on events that had allegedly occurred before trial, and it did not raise any of defendant’s present arguments; in any event, the motion was denied *419and a justice of this Court denied leave to appeal. Accordingly, the merits of defendant’s ineffectiveness claims may not be addressed on appeal. In the alternative, to the extent the existing record permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). Defendant has not shown that either of counsel’s alleged errors fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, or that, viewed individually or collectively, they deprived defendant of a fair trial or affected the outcome of the case.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.15

           2534 N. Miami Avenue
           Suite 2B
           Miami, FL  33127
           305-573-9339
           305-573-9495 (fax)                                         SITEWORKS
                                                                    BUILDING AND
                                                                     DEVELOPMENT

                                CONTRACT/PROPOSAL

September 6, 2005



Kolker Residence
12683 NW 11 Place
Sunrise, FL  33323
954-846-8484

Scope of Work: Furnish all labor and material to complete kitchen design as per
signed drawings and sketches.

       o      Install (2) - 3'x4' single hung windows, (1) 8'x4' (approximate
              size) fixed glass window on west wall of family room, (1) 20"x4'
              single hung window and (1) 5' x 6' French doors on north wall of
              family room. Shutters included

       o      Kitchen: Elmwood - 3/4" Plywood/Frameless Cabinetry -
              Cabinet Line:  Algonquin
              Door Style:  Cambridge
              Wood Species:  Maple
              (11) Knob Pulls
              Granite Countertops - $42.00 per sq. ft. allowance
              TV Stand

       o      Painting

Construction to meet all building code requirements. Construction includes
masonry, electrical, architectural and painting. Paint to be furnished by owner
and painted by Siteworks. Finishes of stucco and painting to match existing as
close as possible.

Specifically not included: flooring, light fixtures and decorative accessories.

Proposed Contract Amount:  27,706.00

Payments as Follows: Payments to be made direct to suppliers as requested to
order and receive material. At the start of the job, bi-weekly draws. Final
payment due and payable upon "substantial completion" of all work under contract

Acceptance of Proposal: The above prices, specifications and conditions are
satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as
specified. Payment will be made as outlined.


Accepted:  ___________________________     Dated:  __________________________

______________________________________     Dated:  __________________________
Carl M. Nurse, CEO
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1,259  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# DLA Distribution Commanding Officer's Labor Day Message

/ Published Aug. 30, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Teammates,

As we approach the Labor Day holiday weekend, I'd like to take the time to thank you all for what you do every day. In the United States, Labor Day marks the end of summer and the beginning of the school season for our children. The annual holiday was initiated as a celebration of the economic and social contributions of workers to the strength, prosperity, and well-being of the country. Labor Day in the United States dates back to Tuesday, September 5, 1882, in New York City. The idea spread with the growth of labor organizations, and in 1885, Labor Day was celebrated in many industrial centers of the country and became a federal holiday in 1894.

As you're sending children back to school, enjoying picnics with friends and family, Ms. Gonzales and I would like to extend our gratitude to the entire DLA Distribution Team for the outstanding work you do each day to keep our Warfighters well supplied. I am proud to be part of this great team that works tirelessly every day to support the many men and women, both military and civilian, deployed worldwide...there are none better!

Please relax and enjoy the upcoming holiday and keep safety in mind in everything you do. You're a valuable member of the Distribution team!

HOOYAH Distribution!

Kevin JonesRDML, SC, US
#### Leonora Alvarado, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[57 NYS3d 3]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered July 9, 2013, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

In this negligence action, plaintiff seeks damages for personal injuries resulting from an assault by a neighbor’s boyfriend. Plaintiff claims that defendants failed to protect her after requesting her assistance as a translator in resolving a domestic dispute between the neighbor and her boyfriend, and that the boyfriend targeted her due to her involvement in this incident.

As plaintiff now concedes, this Court’s decision on a prior appeal, denying defendants’ motion to dismiss *(see Alvarado v City of New York,*60 AD3d 427 [1st Dept 2009]), is not dispositive of the instant motion, as “[t]he law of the case doctrine ‘is inapplicable where, as here, a summary judgment motion follows a motion to dismiss’ ” *(191 Chrystie LLC v Ledoux,*82 AD3d 681, 682 [1st Dept 2011]).

Defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “Whether a special relationship exists is generally a question for the jury” *(Coleson v City of New York,*24 NY3d 476, 483 [2014]). To establish that, plaintiff must prove that she justifiably relied on the municipality’s affirmative undertaking to act on her behalf *(Cuffy v City of New York,*69 NY2d 255, 260 [1987]). Even if a jury could have found that defendants told the boyfriend to leave the area and that they told plaintiff that they would be on patrol in the area, defendants *501established, as a matter of law, that plaintiff could not have justifiably relied on defendants’ assurances after the boyfriend returned and asked to borrow her cell phone, and then crossed the street and sat on a bench before returning to attack her *(see Valdez v City of New York,*18 NY3d 69, 75, 82 [2011]; *Brown v City of New York,*73 AD3d 1113, 1115 [2d Dept 2010]). At that point, it was clear that defendants had not prevented the boyfriend from returning.

Given the foregoing determination, we need not address whether defendants’ conduct was protected by governmental function immunity.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Andrias, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, M. G. Duncan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting.Date: December 13, 2005/s/ M. G. DUNCANM. G. DuncanChief Executive Officer
# Holiday cheer spreads across DLA Aviation

/ Published Dec. 26, 2019
RICHMOND, VA, 
During this time of holiday cheer, many across the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation enterprise took time to give back to their communities or enjoy time with co-workers during office holiday parties. 

DLA Aviation Public Affairs asked you to send us photos and the response was overwhelming. We received dozens of photos showing off creative outfits, office parties, festive office decorations and boxes and boxes of gifts to be donated to those in need in your local communities. 

Over the next couple of weeks, we will be running stories highlighting these photos, so sit back, enjoy and Happy Holidays!!
#### Medeiros v. Medeiros

CAAP-13-0002023

05/14/2014

Vacated and Remanded
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JOSEPH SCHIANO,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-7101

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 13-81, Judge Margaret C. Bartley.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Joseph Schiano moves without opposition to withdraw 

his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

Case: 14-7101 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 10/23/2014
2 SCHIANO v. MCDONALD

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 23, 2014

Case: 14-7101 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 10/23/2014
No. 12-8219.

#### Stanley v. United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 12-7705.

#### Norington *v.*Levenhagen, Superintendent, Westville Correctional Facility.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Heritage Organization, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB  for  the  period  ending  May 31, 2003
(the  "Report"),  I,  Vickie Walker, Chief Executive Officer  and  Chief
Financial Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Vickie Walker
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 29 , 2003
#### W & H Equities, LLC, Respondent, v Marvin Odums, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[52 NYS3d 662]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Marvin Odums appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated May 6, 2013, which denied his motion for recusal, to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 2, 2011, and to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant’s motion which sought recusal, as the appellant failed to set forth any proof of bias or prejudice on the part of the court which would have warranted recusal (see *Sassower v Gannett Co., Inc.,*109 AD3d 607, 609 [2013]; *Daniels v City of New York,*96 AD3d 895, 895 [2012]; see *also*Judiciary Law § 14).

Further, the appellant failed to establish any grounds for vacating the judgment of foreclosure and sale dated August 11, 2011, or to set aside the foreclosure sale held pursuant thereto (see *W & H Equities LLC v Odums,*113 AD3d 840 [2014]; see *also*CPLR 5015 [a]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the appellant’s motion which were to vacate the judgment and sale.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Connolly, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Mariah P., an Infant. Erie County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Timothy W., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[768 NYS2d 922]

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (Rosa, J.), entered February 20, 2002, which adjudged that Mariah P is an abused child and placed the child in the custody of petitioner for a period of 12 months.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court, Erie County, Rosa, J. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAIN SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 OF INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              24,638
<SECURITIES>                                       313,245
<RECEIVABLES>                                       82,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,789
<INVENTORY>                                        138,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   649,847
<PP&E>                                             553,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                     207,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,765,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              243,193
<BONDS>                                            896,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               695
<OTHER-SE>                                         501,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,765,623
<SALES>                                            823,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   823,938
<CGS>                                              485,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      485,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  75,590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     30,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                        15,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .08
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 73886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29170]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products and services 
previously furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are 
blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: 1/12/2015.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

For Further Information or to Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following products and services are proposed for deletion from 
the Procurement List:

Products

Bag, Protective

NSN: 6545-01-222-0684.
NPA: Mount Rogers Community Services Board, Wytheville, VA.
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, 
Philadelphia, PA.

Cover, Telescope Mounting

NSN: 6650-00-773-2030.
NPA: Huntsville Rehabilitation Foundation, Huntsville, AL.
Contracting Activity: Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Richmond, 
VA.

Services

Service Type/Location: Grounds Maintenance Service, United States 
Postal Service: General Mail Facility, San Jose, CA.
NPA: VTF Services, Mountain View, CA (Deleted).
Contracting Activity: U.S. Postal Service, Washington, DC.

Service Type/Location: Janitorial/Custodial Service, U.S. Army 
Reserve Center: Rockford, 1130 Arthur Avenue, Rockford, IL.
NPA: Unknown.
Contracting Activity: Dept of the Army, W6QM MICC-ARCC North, Fort 
McCoy, WI.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-29170 Filed 12-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```