alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Balasubramanian Rajagopalan, Appellant, v Mount Sinai Medical Center et al., Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 524]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered September 20, 2002, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The letter agreement under which plaintiff was appointed to a five-year term as associate professor is unambiguous, and its interpretation likewise presents a question of law for the court, to be made without resort to extrinsic evidence *(West, Weir & Bartel v Carter Paint Co.,*25 NY2d 535, 540 [1969]). Upon expiration of the specified period of employment, plaintiff “failed to demonstrate a limitation by express agreement on his employer’s unfettered right to terminate at will” *(Sabetay v Sterling Drug,*69 NY2d 329, 336 [1987]).

To incorporate the terms of an employee handbook into a contract of employment, the employee must demonstrate reliance upon its terms and resulting detriment *(cf. Weiner v Mc-Graw-Hill, Inc.,*57 NY2d 458, 465-466 [1982]). Plaintiff has established neither. His references to the faculty handbook include no mention of any express restriction on the right of termination *(see Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 305 [1983]). To the contrary, the handbook specifically provides that the departmental chair “may recommend reappointment for an additional five year term ... or not reappoint the individual to the faculty of Mount Sinai School of Medicine.”

Plaintiff received the full benefit of the promised employment for the stated five-year period, and has identified no breach of contract by defendants. We have considered plaintiff’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams and Lerner, JJ.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 10.31  | 11.16  | 13.45  | 15.51  | 15.79  | --     | --     | --     | 3.98  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.69   | 7.58   | 9.81   | 6.19   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar  | Apr  | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |      |      |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W  
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |      | W    |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     | 7.61 | 7.80 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1765

To designate the Federal building located at 300 4th Street, Northeast,

in the District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Daniel Webster Senate Page Residence’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MITCHELL (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 300 4th Street,

Northeast, in the District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Daniel

Webster Senate Page Residence’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL WEBSTER SENATE

4 PAGE RESIDENCE.

5 The Federal building located at 300 4th Street,

6 Northeast, in the District of Columbia, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Daniel Webster Senate Page Resi8 dence’’.
2

•S 1765 CPS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Daniel Webster Senate Page Resi6 dence’’.

Æ
# A cold day in New York

/ Published Jan. 31, 2019
Ft. Drum, New York, 
The Polar Vortex managed to pull off a stunt at a DLA Disposition Services site in New York state that is very rarely successful. 

The conditions that came with the vortex closed the site at Fort Drum. Other DLA Disposition Services’ sites across its path also had early departure, late arrivals or were closed.

But Drum is usually open for business under winter conditions that would close most other bases, which is why one employee was still out at dawn using a vehicle mounted snow blower to clear a truck scale.

Disposal Service Representative Rob De Long said that’s what he was doing recently on a day when it wasn’t bad enough to keep traffic away from his site. Using a Bobcat UTV with a snow blower attachment, he went after the two feet of snow on the ground from Jan. 22 to the clear the truck scale.

“I special ordered this machine just for the scale,” De Long said. “We have to get the snow away from the load cells, for it to work properly.”

By Jan. 28 De Long said it did warm up, but he noted the site received “ three feet of snow over the weekend -- foot or more coming tomorrow -- with another 2-3 feet by Friday.”

But anyone in any of the Defense Logistics Agency’s sites in the “lower 48 states” should remember there are those folks farther north in Alaska. For them, the Polar Vortex is their next door neighbor.

In December 2016 Kathy Wigginton from the Fairbanks, Alaska,  site wrote about the realities of work up where the conditions just encountered in the lower states occur all winter.

 “Half the day is worked in the dark because the sun doesn't come up until 10:30 a.m. and starts to go down again at 3 p.m. 

“It takes extra care and caution to operate machinery in the dark. “

“if you throw a cup of water or coffee out, it will freeze before it hits the ground.

“If you leave the roll up doors open too long, the water in the eye wash station will begin to freeze. 

“Forklifts and loaders do not stop on a dime when the ground is ice. 

“When breakup starts the ice build-up melts at different degrees and spaces so it often feels like driving on egg crates. 

 “The base may have delayed arrival or early release if there is a white out but it is rare to have a closure due to snow accumulation. 

“Our weathermen have only started to call our winds hurricane force winds (70 mph). They've just been gusty winds in the past. We had strong winds when it was blowing 104 mph.”

All weather is local.  All weather is relative.
2017-0219.

#### State v. Walker.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00076, 2016-Ohio-7314. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Fischer, J., dissents.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                                              
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Damone Gadsden, Appellant, v Yamilka Montes et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 630]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated December 18, 2002, which denied that branch of his motion which was for leave to reargue, and which, upon granting that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew, adhered to a prior determination of the same court dated September 3, 2002, granting the separate motions of the defendants Yamilka Montes and Ana Cruz, the defendant Janea Hill, and the defendant Earl Melvin for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order of denying leave to reargue; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

*675Contrary to the plaintiffs contention on appeal, the affirmed medical report offered in support of that branch of his motion which was for leave to renew was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact that he sustained a serious injury within the meaning Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Dufel v Green,*84 NY2d 795 [1995]; *Chinnici v Brown,*295 AD2d 465 [2002]; *Collazo v Jun Yong Kim,*288 AD2d 173 [2001]; *Taylor v Jerusalem Air,*280 AD2d 466 [2001]). Accordingly, upon granting renewal, the Supreme Court properly adhered to the prior determination granting the respondents’ separate motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions concern that branch of his motion which was for leave to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable *(see Piacentini v Mineola Union Free School Dist.,*279 AD2d 513 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

i Eononblr H. H. Darrt 

### Couat~ AadltOr 

### TortBon Conatr Riohaoa.d, Tsar

on the r0ii0dng

a rrferrrd 

### to, this



### aourt in a general road law of out in Title I,&, Volume tes, ls not aapowerab or tombllea, piak-upr, or truakr **urad bJ**  **thr oomirrlonrrr**  **in** dutiar **II** oounty oomdedonrr~. l that portion of Se c tion 2 O f the **or tort**  Bead Oouat~ **appplloablr to**  **thlr qurrtlon**  **(Ia follarrrr** Eloaorabla 8. 1p. Darat, paga 2
USaId oomdaalonare* oourt shall

_ hare power to purchsaa au6h teaas, tool8 and mohlmry aa wy be uecraaary for the **working of**  It8 roada.* We have aarafully es8mln~d the spaaial road lax **for** Tort Band County, from whloh the abo~a paotatlon was t&can, and aaa iin4 nothin tharrin whloh would areapt raid aounty rroa the general rula knaounard In our Opinions Hoe. O-752 and o-996.

Plaeaa do not uderrtand ua aa parring on 

### roadlax o? your thr oonatitutlonality of thr 

### l proial oouaty in thla oplalon.

Trusting thla anewera yaw IOUr Inquiry, we are tary tmly

FCOaAW
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 13, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill III, Assistant 
Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. First National Corporation, Orangeburg, South Carolina; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Florence County National 
Bank (in organization), Florence, South Carolina.
    2. Mercantile Bankshares Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Marshall National Bank and 
Trust Company, Marshall, Virginia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Lincoln Interim Corporation, Lincolnton, Georgia; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 62 percent of the voting shares of 
Lincoln Bancshares, Inc., Lincolnton, Georgia, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Farmers State Bank, Lincolnton, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 15, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-1388 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
*May 17, 2017*

2017-Ohio-2822.]

2016-1857.

#### State ex rel. Taylor v. Nobles.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1927 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1927

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 1994

             Referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To increase the rates of compensation for veterans with service-
   connected disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity 
      compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Compensation Cost-of-
Living Adjustment Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. DISABILITY COMPENSATION AND DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY 
              COMPENSATION RATE INCREASES.

    (a) In General.--(1) The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall, as 
provided in paragraph (2), increase, effective December 1, 1994, the 
rates of and limitations on Department of Veterans Affairs disability 
compensation and dependency and indemnity compensation.
    (2)(A) The Secretary shall increase each of the rates and 
limitations provided for in sections 1114, 1115(1), 1162, 1311, 1313, 
and 1314 of title 38, United States Code. The increase shall be by the 
same percentage that benefit amounts payable under title II of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) are increased effective 
December 1, 1994, as a result of a determination under section 215(i) 
of such Act (42 U.S.C. 415(i)).
    (B) In the computation of increased rates and limitations pursuant 
to subparagraph (A), amounts of $0.50 or more shall be rounded to the 
next higher dollar amount and amounts of less than $0.50 shall be 
rounded to the next lower dollar amount.
    (b) Special Rule.--The Secretary may adjust administratively, 
consistent with the increases made under subsection (a), the rates of 
disability compensation payable to persons within the purview of 
section 10 of Public Law 85-857 (2 Stat. 1263) who are not in receipt 
of compensation payable pursuant to chapter 11 of title 38, United 
States Code.
    (c) Publication Requirement.--At the same time as the matters 
specified in section 215(i)(2)(D) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
415(i)(2)(D)) are required to be published by reason of a determination 
made under section 215(i) of such Act during fiscal year 1994, the 
Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register the rates and 
limitations referred to in subsection (a)(2)(A) as increased under this 
section.

            Passed the Senate May 4 (legislative day, May 2), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```