alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.62   | 5.90  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.86   | 7.61   | 14.52  | 5.84   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1877 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1877

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the deductibility 
 of interest and similar amounts attributable to deferred compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 28 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the deductibility 
 of interest and similar amounts attributable to deferred compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION OF INTEREST AND SIMILAR AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO 
              DEFERRED COMPENSATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 404 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to deductions for compensation under a deferred payment plan) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(m) Deductibility of Interest and Similar Amounts Accrued With 
Respect To Deferred Compensation.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this chapter, the 
        determination of the taxable year in which a deduction is 
        allowed for amounts described in paragraph (2) shall be made 
        under this section and in the same manner as if such amounts 
        were compensation.
            ``(2) Applicable amounts.--An amount is described in this 
        paragraph if it is--
                    ``(A) interest or a similar amount based on the 
                time value of money, and
                    ``(B) an integral part of the method used to 
                calculate the total amount of deferred compensation to 
                be paid.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts accruing in taxable years beginning before, on, or after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
2017-1055.

#### Snuggs v. Jenkins.

In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
# Troop Support retiree honored for 31 years of service

/ Published March 29, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
Karen Goodburlet was honored by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support for 31 years of federal service at a retirement ceremony March 28 in Philadelphia.

The ceremony was presided over by DLA Troop Support Deputy Commander Richard Ellis, who thanked Goodburlet for her dedication to the warfighter and highlighted her impact as a purchasing agent in the Medical supply chain. 

“Service members around the world know that they’ll want for nothing...,” Ellis said. “They may not know how it gets there, but we do. It’s provided by outstanding employees like you.”

Goodburlet started her federal career in 1988 with the U.S. Postal Service, eventually moving to the Department of Veteran Affairs, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and finally to Troop Support. She was proud of her federal career and her support to the nation. 

“Since my dad was a veteran, I felt like I was giving back” Goodburlet said. “My whole [federal] career, I’ve felt like there was a purpose to what I was doing in life.”

Goodburlet fondly recalled 12-hour shifts with the Post Office’s processing and delivery department after 9/11, working to ensure postal services were uninterrupted despite a national emergency and air traffic stoppage. After joining Troop Support, her history as a contracting officer and dedication to duty became an asset to her team and the warfighter when one day she stepped up... 

“Two of my coworkers were out, and some [contract] awards weren’t going through,” Goodburlet said. “So I went to my boss and asked, ‘Is there something I can do to help the team?’”

Because of Goodburlet’s proactive effort, she was able to get the certification needed to aid the award process and get medical supplies to the warfighter on time, she said. 

“Throughout my whole 31 year career, I felt like I’ve made a difference,” Goodburlet said. “Not alone, but as a team. It always takes a team effort to do what we [federal employees] do.”

Goodburlet looks forward to traveling and spending time with friends and family in her retirement. She also intends on putting her contract negotiation skills to work in her personal life as she and her husband do “market research” into moving.
# DLA Installation Support for Distribution’s Mellon presented commander’s coin

/ Published March 25, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Glenn Mellon, an equipment specialist for DLA Installation Support for Distribution – Engineering & Equipment Division, received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 26.

Mellon’s primary duties include administration and training associated with the Defense Property Accountability System. Due to demand, most DPAS training classes are only held in continental U.S. locations.  

As such, DLA Distribution Sigonella, Italy’s Equipment Specialist Marcello Massimino was due to arrive in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania late in the evening and attend DPAS Training at New Cumberland the following morning.  

Mellon, knowing that this was Massimino’s first time in America, and between language and road differences — and the fact that it was near midnight by the time he arrived — it would be difficult to navigate his way from the airport to the hotel, took it upon himself to meet Massimino at the airport to help him navigate to his hotel and make sure he made it on time to his DPAS training.  

Additionally, Mellon learned Massimino had always wanted to see Washington D.C.  Therefore, over the weekend he drove him down on his time to see the nation’s capital.  

“While he wasn’t wild about sharing this story for recognition – this act truly epitomizes the way Glenn does his job on a daily basis.  His honest, common-sense approach has been a tremendous benefit to our organization,” said Bill Holz, director, DLA Installation Management for Distribution.
No. 12-7008.

#### Rozier *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Michele Rafferty, Respondent, v Andrew Ettinger, Appellant.

[55 NYS3d 145]

Appeal by the father from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Hal B. Greenwald, J.), entered March 14, 2016. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of that court (Alan Hochberg, S.M.), dated January 6, 2016, which, after a hearing, found that the father willfully violated a prior order of child support, and confirmed the finding that he was in willful violation of the order of child support.

Ordered that the order entered March 14, 2016, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On a motion to hold a parent in willful violation of an order of child support, “[p]roof of failure to pay child support constitutes prima facie evidence of a willful violation” *(Matter of Myles v Turner,*137 AD3d 1038, 1039 [2016]; *see*Family Ct Act § 454 [3] [a]). Once a prima facie showing of willfulness has been made, the burden shifts to the party that owes the support to offer some competent, credible evidence of his or her inability to comply with the order *(see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Henry,*136 AD3d 639, 640 [2016]). Here, the mother’s submission of proof that the father failed to comply with the order of support satisfied her prima facie burden (see *id.).*In opposition, the father failed to submit competent, credible evidence of his inability to pay support as ordered (see *Matter of Myles v Turner,*137 AD3d at 1039). Thus, the Family Court correctly denied the father’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s order.

By failing to object to the Support Magistrate’s determination of his recusal motion, the father failed to preserve any objection to that portion of the Support Magistrate’s order *(see Matter of Hubbard v Barber,*107 AD3d 1344, 1345 [2013]).

Accordingly, the Family Court correctly denied the father’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s finding that the father willfully failed to pay child support as ordered *(see Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v Henry,*136 AD3d at 639).

Balkin, J.P., Hall, Sgroi and Barros, JJ., concur.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1784

AN ACT

To restore the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida

Bureau of Indian Affairs.gible to receive Services from the United StatesInterior list of Indian entities recognized and eliIndian Tribes of Alaska to the Department of the
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1784

AN ACT

To restore the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian

Tribes of Alaska to the Department of the Interior list

of Indian entities recognized and eligible to receive Services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1784 ES

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION.

2 The Secretary of the Department of the Interior shall

3 restore to the list, published in the Federal Register on

4 October 21, 1993 pursuant to 25 C.F.R. Part 83, the tribe

5 defined and recognized in the Act of June 19, 1935 (49

6 Stat. 388), as amended, relating to the Tlingit and Haida

7 Indians of Alaska.

Passed the Senate November 24 (legislative day, November 23), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
# L_2011271EN.01004901.xml

| 18.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 271/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 271/49

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 October 2011

on the request by the United Kingdom to accept Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA

(notified under document C(2011) 7228)

(Only the English text is authentic)

(2011/692/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 331(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Parliament and the Council adopted on 5 April 2011 Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Parliament and the Council adopted on 5 April 2011 Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (1).

| (2) | Pursuant to Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom did not take part in the adoption of the Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the United Kingdom did not take part in the adoption of the Directive and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, the United Kingdom notified the Commission by letter of 14 July 2011 of its intention to accept the Directive, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 4 of the said Protocol, the United Kingdom notified the Commission by letter of 14 July 2011 of its intention to accept the Directive,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Directive 2011/36/EU shall apply to the United Kingdom.

Article 2

Directive 2011/36/EU shall come into force for the United Kingdom from the date of notification of this Decision.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2011.

For the Commission

Cecilia MALMSTRÖM

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 99 - Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 

      I, Shawn  O'Brien,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of CIS  Investments,  Inc.  ("CISI"),  the Managing Owner of JWHGlobal Trust (the  "Trust"),  and I, James A.  Davison,  the  President of CISI,  certify that (i) the attached  10-K fullycomplies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the attached Form 10-K fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results ofoperations of the Trust.
 

 

 

 

James A. Davison         President         CIS Investments, Inc.         March 29, 2003
 

 

 

 

Shawn D. O'Brien         Chief Financial Officer         CIS Investments, Inc.         March 29, 2003
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Utah Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Utah Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 28     | 28    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 38     | 44     | 34     | 37     | 81     | 30     | 27     |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 47     | 54     | 85     | 154    | 203    | 226    | 296    | 386    | 537    | 707   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 765    | 805    | 829    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                                 
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     | W  
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

JAIME LUEVANO,

Relator.

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00185-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable James T. Carter to reopen a writ of habeas corpus and inquiry/examination trial and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the 

petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Exhibit 31.4**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard A. Baron, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of eResearchTechnology, Inc. (Amendment No.1); and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.        Date:  March 12, 2007 /s/      Richard A. Baron   Richard A Baron,   Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Mines Management, Inc., a Idaho Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Mines Management, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mines Management, Inc.

Date:  November 29, 2004

/s/ Glenn M. Dobbs

________________________________

Glenn M. Dobbs,

Chief Executive Officer