alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

Financial Data Schedule

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Statement  of  Financial Condition for Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company
at  September  30, 1999, the Statements of Income for the six month period ended
September  30,  1999,  and  is  qualified  in  its entirety by reference to such
financial  statements.
</LEGEND><S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                           15,884
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 15,884
<PP&E>                                                           53,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   69,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             2,754
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                        493,880
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (426,942)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     69,692
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    200
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    (580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                (580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       (580)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHELULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF INCOME, STATEMENTS OF CASHFLOWS AND
STATEMENTS OF CAPITALIZATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       296867
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      56762
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           77949
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         34683
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  466261
<COMMON>                                         67000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              61048
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  128048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        862
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            214769
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     5283
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  117299
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   466261
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       286749
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             14822
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      241542
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      256364
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          30385
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               (795)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   29590
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         15966
<NET-INCOME>                                     13624
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         61
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    13563
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          8962
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                         1604
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           48509
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 32011D0820(01) - EN

*|*

# 32011D0820(01)

**Commission Decision of 19 August 2011 on public holidays for 2013 for the institutions of the European Union **

*
Official Journal C 243 , 20/08/2011 P. 0004 - 0004 *

Commission Decision

of 19 August 2011

on public holidays for 2013 for the institutions of the European Union

2011/C 243/05

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2013

1 January | Tuesday, New Year’s Day |

2 January | Wednesday, the day following New Year's Day |

28 March | Maundy Thursday |

29 March | Good Friday |

1 April | Easter Monday |

1 May | Wednesday, Labour Day |

9 May | Thursday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950 + Ascension Day |

10 May | Friday, the day following Ascension Day |

20 May | Whit Monday |

15 August | Thursday, Assumption Day |

1 November | Friday, All Saints' Day |

24 December to 31 December | Tuesday 6 end-of-year days Tuesday |

TOTAL: | 17 days |

Luxembourg: same days apply as in Brussels

Work will resume as normal on Friday 3 January 2014.

Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2014, Thursday 2 January 2014 will be a holiday.

The Commission reserves the right to modify these provisions, should the needs of service so require.

--------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 7.12   | 6.98  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 8.75   | 11.51  | 7.78   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7639.

#### Esquivel-Padilla *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Frances S. Campbell, Appellant, v Gregory M. Wendt, Respondent.

[54 NYS3d 855]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered on or about May 18, 2016, which, to the *414extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on plaintiff’s inability to establish a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant met his prima facie burden of showing that plaintiff’s claims of pain and headaches did not constitute a serious injury causally related to the 2009 motor vehicle accident. Plaintiff’s treating physician’s unaffirmed opinion that the accident exacerbated the chronic conditions was insufficient.

To the extent plaintiff’s claimed new injury of occipital headaches could constitute a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), plaintiff failed to provide any evidence of such injuries. Nor did her physician compare plaintiff’s measured range of motion in her cervical and lumbar spines to a preaccident standard, and thus any claimed deficits “could not be properly assessed to see whether they are significant” *(Mirdita v Ash Leasing Inc.,*101 AD3d 480, 480 [1st Dept 2012]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Maz-zarelli and Gische, JJ.
Summit Oak Development,



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 9, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00205

- CV

FOUNTAINS INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

, Appe llant

v.

SUMMIT OAK DEVELOPMENT, LLC

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005

- CI

- 09146 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Amended Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED

. The a ppellant ’ s reply brief is due on August 9, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
# Susquehanna, Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation hosts 2nd annual Princess Ball

/ Published March 18, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND,Pa., 
Defense Distribution Susquehanna, Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Division hosted an enchanting night for all little princesses at the Father and Daughter Princess Ball Feb. 22 at the Susquehanna Club, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.

With children ranging in age from two to 13, this was the second year MWR hosted the sold-out event, which was attended by 200 fathers and daughters. 

“Guests were greeted at the door by a princess playing the ukulele and singing songs from the movie ‘Moana,’” explained Susquehanna Club Manager Sharen Ewell. “We took formal photos before the princesses and their escorts were formally announced into the ballroom.”

MWR transformed the Susquehanna Club into a fairytale land and attendees were given the opportunity to meet some of their favorite magical Princesses including Cinderella, Elsa, Maleficent and Belle. The evening also included light hors d’oeuvres and desserts, dancing, and a Princess “meet and greet.”

DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania commander Army Col. Marchant Callis II and his daughter had a fantastic time at the Princess Ball. “It was clear that our MWR team did an outstanding job planning and executing the event. From the music and dancing, food and well-planned activities, to the MWR staff dressing up in character themselves, it was just really well organized and fun. After talking with many other DDC Susquehanna teammates who attended the event, I can confidently say that everyone had a really good time. I’m already looking forward to next year.”
**EXHIBIT13.1**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to18 U.S. C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), T.C. Leung, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

June 29, 2009

 
| /s/ T.C. Leung           |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| T.C. Leung               |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

----
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00060

- CV

In the Interest of A.A. and A.A., Children

(No. 13

- 00152 IN 276TH DISTR ICT COURT OF MARION COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

FILING $10.00
$845.00
$0.00
$195.00 EXEMPT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT

INDIGENT TDFPS

STEVEN ABLEMAN

STEVEN ABLEMAN

STEVEN ABLEMAN

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

**Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.** 

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF

T EXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this January 8, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 106 (Wednesday, June 3, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 30215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-54-005]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

May 28, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG) tendered for filing its refund report in Docket No. RP98-54. CIG 
states that this filing and refunds were made to comply with the 
Commission's (Commission) Order of September 10, 1997. Initial refunds 
were paid by CIG on May 1, 1998.
    CIG states that the May 18, 1998 refund report summarizes the 
refunds made as of that date by CIG for Kansas ad valorem tax 
overpayments pursuant to the Commission's September 10, 1997 Order. 
Lump-sum cash refunds were made by CIG to its former jurisdictional 
sales customers. In those instances where payment was not made within 
30 days of receipt from the producers, appropriate interest was 
computed as provided for in the Order.
    CIG states that copies of CIG's filing have been served on CIG's 
former jurisdictional sales customers, interested state commissions, 
and all parties to the proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before June 4, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14637 Filed 6-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Metro Information Services, Inc.:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements (Nos.
333-22751, 333-22753 and 333-22777) on Form S-8 of Metro Information Services,
Inc. of our reports dated February 2, 1998, relating to the balance sheets of
Metro Information Services, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related statements of income, cash flows and changes in redeemable common stock
and shareholders' equity and the schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which reports appear in the December
31, 1997 Report on Form 10-K of Metro Information Services, Inc.
 
                               /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Norfolk, Virginia
February 27, 1998
 
                                    Page 58
#### Michelle Polidoro, Respondent, v Concetta D’Angelo et al., Appellants.

[767 NYS2d 844]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated December 16, 2002, which upon the granting of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in their favor as against the weight of the evidence, awarded judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On June 22, 1999, the plaintiff was driving on Route 347 at its intersection with Crystal Brook Hollow Road in Suffolk County when her vehicle was forced off the road by a vehicle leased and operated by the defendant Concetta D’Angelo and owned by the defendant Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation. Following a trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, finding that D’Angelo was negligent but that her negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident.

By finding that D’Angelo’s negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident, the jury essentially concluded either that the plaintiffs conduct was the sole cause of the accident or that an intervening factor caused the accident at issue. However, no evidence was presented at the trial to establish any fault on the part of the plaintiff or that any intervening factor existed. Based on the evidence presented at the trial, it was logically impossible for the jury to find that D’Angelo was negligent without also finding causation. Therefore, not only *429was the jury verdict against the weight of the evidence because it was unsupported by any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]; *cf. Campbell v Crimi,*267 AD2d 343 [1999]), it also was unsupported by sufficient evidence as a matter of law because there was no valid line of reasoning or permissible inference which could have led the jury to conclude that D’Angelo was negligent but that her negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the accident *(see Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553 [1997]; *Sheeler v Blade Contr.,*262 AD2d 632, 633 [1999]; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly set aside the verdict and directed the entry of judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff (see *Sheeler v Blade Contr., supra).*

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. McGinity, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# Norfolk’s Larkin chosen as DLA Outstanding Junior Enlisted Reservist of the Year

/ Published Dec. 12, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Mary M. Larkin, distribution process worker, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, has been awarded DLA Outstanding Junior Enlisted Reservist of the Year for fiscal year 2019.

Larkin was recognized for her outstanding leadership since checking aboard DLA Distribution Norfolk, which included a 22-day deployment to Poland in support of Exercise Saber Strike.

Assigned as a distribution process worker, Larkin has accepted additional duties as assistant command fitness leader and unit public affairs representative. During the award period, Larkin graduated from the 80-hour Expeditionary Academy course. Larkin took the initiative to practice and master on the job training skills required to become 100%qualified for her position in less than the allotted time.

Larkin became forklift licensed and completed Distribution Standard System familiarization to support an operational, 15-day annual training in support of the Material Process Center in Sigonella, Italy, where she worked with a team that saved nearly $41,000 in labor costs by processing nearly 7,000 items valued $1.5 million. 

Serving as DLA Distribution Norfolk’s unit public affairs representative, Larkin has written and photographed significant events for her unit and command. 

As a full-time student, Larkin has completed 27 credit hours toward a Bachelor of Science, Health and Physical Education from Tidewater Community College. She has volunteered 40 hours serving disadvantaged citizens at the Judeo-Christian Outreach Center in Virginia Beach and ran in a 5K race in support of the Make a Wish Foundation.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby conscent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-24011, No. 333-24013 and No. 333-09146) of 
Apex PC Solutions, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 1999, except as to 
the 3-for-2 stock split and description of litigation description of 
litigation described in Subsequent Event as to which the date is March 4, 
1999, appearing in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 26, 1999