alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                           1
<CASH>                                                                3,675
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        16,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           (848)
<INVENTORY>                                                           1,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     21,856
<PP&E>                                                                4,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       34,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                20,901
<BONDS>                                                               7,768
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                 41
<OTHER-SE>                                                            4,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         34,283
<SALES>                                                              76,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     76,892
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        76,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    1,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (1,562)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (1,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (1,577)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                          (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (.38)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains restated year-to-date summary financial
information extracted from Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal
1997 third quarter Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
sucm Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,641
<INVENTORY>                                     84,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,512
<PP&E>                                         659,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 849,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     426,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   849,344
<SALES>                                        142,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,786
<CGS>                                          106,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36
        


</TABLE>
No. 12-7179.

#### Roberson *v.*Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29461-29462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14242]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-397]

Washington Public Power Supply System; Notice of Issuance of 
Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) has issued 
Amendment No. to Facility Operating License No. NPF-21 issued to 
Washington Public Power Supply System (the licensee), for operation of 
the Washington Nuclear Project No. 2 (WNP-2), located in Benton County, 
Washington.
    The amendment is effective as of the date of issuance.
    The amendment revises the maximum yield strength for emergency core 
cooling system suction strainer materials listed in the WNP-2 Final 
Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
    The application for the amendment complies with the standards and 
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), 
and the Commission's rules and regulations. The Commission has made 
appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission's rules 
and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license 
amendment.
    Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Opportunity 
for Hearing in connection with this action was published in the Federal 
Register on April 21, 1998 (63 FR 19758). No request for a hearing or 
petition for leave to intervene was filed following this notice.
    The Commission has prepared an Environmental Assessment related to

[[Page 29462]]

the action and has determined not to prepare an environmental impact 
statement. Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission has 
concluded that the issuance of this amendment will not have a 
significant effect on the quality of the human environment.
    For further details with respect to the action see (1) the 
application for amendment dated April 16, 1998, as supplemented by 
letters dated April 28, 1998, and May 8, 1998. (2) Amendment No. 153 to 
Facility Operating License No. NPF-21, and (3) the Commission's related 
Safety Evaluation and Environmental Assessment. All of these items are 
available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document 
Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and 
at the local public document room located at the Richland Public 
Library, 955 Northgate Street, Richland, Washington 99352.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of May 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Chester Poslusny,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate IV-2, Division of Reactor 
Projects III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-14242 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
No. 12-8014.

#### Allen *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**Certificationof**

**PrincipalChief Executive Officer**

**of ChasePackaging Corporation Pursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual reporton Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,2009, of Chase Packaging Corporation (the “Company”).  I, Allen T. McInnes, the Chairman of theBoard, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as anexhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K andSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and,accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date: March 30,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Allen T. McInnes                            |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Allen T. McInnes                                |
|                       |   | Chairman of the Board,  President and Treasurer |
|                       |   | (Principal Chief  Executive Officer)            |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Rose Frawert, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Mid-State
Raceway, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
30, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: January 10, 2004

/s/ Rose Frawert
-------------------------------
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


                                       16
No. 12-8638.

#### Diver *v.*Smith, Administrator, Albemarle Correctional Institution.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|New Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ---------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |         |         |         |         | 54,020  | 57,462  | 60,590   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 71,867    | 93,071    | 127,548   | 167,961 | 218,023 | 264,606 | 431,302 | 546,632 | 703,725 | 1,034,994
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,353,797 | 1,648,290 | 2,078,686 |         |         |         |         |         |         |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Samuel DiSalvo et al., Respondents, v Carrie A. Hiller et al., Appellants.

[770 NYS2d 221]

*1387Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Drury, J.), entered September 17, 2002, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the jury verdict finding that defendant Carrie A. Hiller was not negligent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied and the verdict is reinstated.

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 seeking to set aside the jury verdict finding that Carrie A. Hiller (defendant) was not negligent with respect to a motor vehicle accident wherein a vehicle driven by Samuel DiSalvo (plaintiff) struck a vehicle driven by defendant, and owned by defendant Jim Culligan, Inc. while defendant was making a left-hand turn in front of plaintiffs vehicle. Supreme Court erred in determining that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendants (see *Greene v Frontier Cent. School Dist.,*214 AD2d 947, 948 [1995]), we conclude that it does not so preponderate in favor of plaintiffs that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]; *Miller v Reynolds,*298 AD2d 836, 837 [2002]). It is undisputed that defendant, who was traveling south, attempted to make a left-hand turn at an intersection while plaintiff was traveling north towards the intersection. Defendant testified, however, that the left turn signal on plaintiffs vehicle was activated and that both she and plaintiff “yielded” at the intersection. Defendant further testified that, based upon those observations, she believed that plaintiff was going to execute a left-hand turn at the intersection, and therefore she proceeded to do so as well. Given defendant’s testimony, “it cannot be said that the verdict . . . could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Miller,*298 AD2d at 837). We therefore reverse the order, deny plaintiffs’ motion and reinstate the verdict in favor of defendants. Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddy White, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 584]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J. at suppression hearing; Juan Merchan, J. at jury trial, sentencing, and resentencing), rendered October 25, 2012, as amended October 20, 2014, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

Even if we agree with defendant that the court should have suppressed, as the product of custodial interrogation without *511
      *Miranda*warnings, a statement he made at the scene of his arrest acknowledging ownership of a jacket he had secreted, we find that the receipt of the admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt (see *People v Romero,*27 NY3d 981 [2016]; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 240-241 [1975]). The overwhelming proof included not only the prompt and reliable identification made by the victim, who pursued defendant after the crime, but also a chain of circumstantial evidence having no reasonable explanation other than defendant’s guilt. Moreover, defendant’s admission added little to the People’s case, and it was cumulative to an officer’s testimony that he saw defendant take off and secrete the jacket.

Defendant’s right of confrontation was not violated by evidence, admitted with an appropriate jury instruction, that a nontestifying store clerk falsely denied that the victim’s phone was present in his store, which defendant had been seen entering and leaving. This undisputedly false declaration was not received for its truth *(see Tennessee v Street,*471 US 409 [1985]). On the contrary, its falsity was established by evidence that the police found the phone in the store by dialing its number and hearing it ring. The clerk’s declaration did not incriminate defendant, and it completed the narrative of how the police recovered the phone. In any event, any error was likewise harmless.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  August 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Mark  King,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Mark King
-------------------
Mark King, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Siebert  Financial  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chairwoman and President of the Company,
hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1. the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  of the Company at the end of the
period  covered by the Report and the results of  operations  of the Company for
the period covered by the Report.


     /s/ Muriel F. Siebert                                  Dated:  May 14, 2003
     ----------------------------------------------
     Muriel F. Siebert
     Chairwoman and President (principal executive
      officer)



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SIEBERT  FINANCIAL  CORP. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SIEBERT  FINANCIAL
CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE  COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2


Certification of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

I, Rose Frawert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: January 10, 2004

/s/ Rose Frawert
------------------------------
Rose Frawert
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


                                       14