alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ James H. Moore





James H. Moore

Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.













1
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Litwin, MD, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of eResearchTechnology, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey Litwin, MD               
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Jeffrey Litwin, MD,                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  |  |  |  |
#### Com. v. Hollinger

03/23/2016

943 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 496
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00324

- CV

Mark Malone, M.D., PA d/b/a Advanced Pain Care , Appellant

v.

Asim Aijaz, M.D. , Appellee

FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 23

- 005275 , THE HONORABLE CATHERI N E MAUZY , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mark Malone , M.D., P A d/b/a Advanced Pain Care file d a motion to dismiss t his

appeal asse rting that the parties have rea ched an agreemen t on the issue s that are the subject of

this appeal. H e represents that Asim Aijaz, M.D. does not oppose th e motion. We grant the

motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a )(2).

__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Dismissed on Appel lan t ’ s Motion

Filed: June 11, 2024
# DLA Counsel-Distribution’s McNaughton presented commander’s coin

/ Published April 19, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Counsel-Distribution employee Sherry McNaughton received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution Commanding Officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 26.

McNaughton created reports that provide the Distribution commander, deputy commander, and chief of staff with weekly updates on the status of all open Army Regulation 15-6 administrative investigations, DLA Inspector General Investigations, and Financial Liability Investigations of Property Loss for lost or damaged government property.  These reports enable Distribution senior leaders to become aware of trends and indicators at Distribution Centers that warrant attention. 

In addition, McNaughton flawlessly tracked the status of more than 650 Distribution employees who are required to file the annual confidential financial disclosure statement in the Financial Data Management System during the filing period of January 1 to February 15, 2019, to ensure Distribution successfully complied with this annual requirement.
### Re: Revised RTR package Ken Hustvedt to: Higgins, Cortney, nbeck 09/13/2010 07:23 PM

Cc: Ann Johnson, Dave Guinnup, Dave Salman, Elaine Manning, Fred Talcott, George Woodall, Jan Tierney, Mark Morris, Mary Kissell, Paula Hirtz, Phil Mulrine, Randy Mcdonald, Rick Vetter, Sarah Mazur, Stan Durkee, Steve Shedd, Ted Palma, Tim Benner, Wendy Blake, Fred Talcott, Peter Tsirigotis, Wendy Blake 

### Here is the revised version per our discussion today. Due to the timing the rest of Agency has not seen these changes.

RTR Bins12 OMB ProPkg13Sep10.doc



### Ken Hustvedt 09/11/2010 01:20:00 AM here is the revised package and a compare v the...
From: Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney

_ Higgins@omb.eop.gov>, nbeck@omb.eop.gov Cc: Ann Johnson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Dave Guinnup/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Dave Salman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Elaine Manning/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, George Woodall/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan Tierney/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mark Morris/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary Kissell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Paula Hirtz/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Phil Mulrine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Mcdonald/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rick Vetter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Sarah Mazur/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Stan Durkee/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Shedd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ted Palma/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tim Benner/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Wendy Blake/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/11/2010 01:20 AM Subject: Revised RTR package 

### here is the revised package and a compare v the original one we sent. It is not based on the revised Chrome section we sent; the changes reflect our new version that we sent earlier. Also, there have been extensive changes to the SSM provisions Talk to you Monday KC hustvedt [attachment "RTR compare 9 10 10.docx" deleted by Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "RTR Bins12 OMB ProPkg10Sep10.doc" deleted by Ken Hustvedt/RTP/USEPA/US]
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 6,627  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb  | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug   | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     | W   |     |     |       |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     | W   | W   | W   | 12.60 |     | W   |     | W  
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |      |     |     | W   |     |     |       |     |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     | 4.73 |     |     |     |     |     |       |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit
10.37


ENTERPRISE
BANCORP, INC.


Description of Directors’
Compensation


Enterprise
Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) pays no separate compensation to its
directors for their service as members of the Company’s board of directors. The
Company’s principal subsidiary, Enterprise Bank and Trust Company (the “Bank”),
pays the following fees on a per meeting and annual retainer basis to members
of its board of directors and board of directors committees, except that
directors who are also full-time salaried employees of the Bank are not paid
any fees for any of their services as directors:


Per Meeting Fees


·                  Board
of Directors meetings - $350


·                  Executive
Committee meetings - $350


·                  Audit
Committee meetings - $350


·                  All
other committee meetings - $250


Annual Retainer Fees (as of July 1,
2006)


·                  All
directors - $7,200


·                  All
members of Executive Committee - $2,400


·                  Chairs
of following committees:


·                  Audit
- $7,500


·                  Asset-Liability
- $6,000


·                  Compensation/Personnel
- $6,000


·                  Investment
Management and Trust Group - $6,000


·                  Corporate
Governance/Nominating - $5,000


·                  Loan
- $5,000


·                  Banking
Technology - $4,000


·                  Marketing
and Business Development - $3,000


Directors
also have the right to make an irrevocable election for each year (by no later
than December 31st of the preceding year) to receive shares of
the Company’s common stock in lieu of receiving an elected portion of cash fees.
The number of shares issued to directors pursuant to this election is based on
the fair market value of the common stock as of the first trading day of the
year for which the election applies.
Exhibit 13(a).1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



|1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía Anónima Nacional Teléfonos de Venezuela (CANTV) (the Company);
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 29, 2004



/s/ Gustavo RoosenGustavo RoosenChief Executive Officer
No. 12-451.

#### New York, New York LLC, dba New York New York Hotel & Casino *v.*National Labor Relations Board et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of American Hotel and Lodging Association et al. for leave to file brief as *amici curiae*granted. Motion of National Retail Federation for leave to file brief as *amicus curiae*out of time denied. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2005 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2005

     To make certain technical corrections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

    Mr. Leahy (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Pryor, and Mr. Lugar) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

             March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To make certain technical corrections, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Sections 101B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 103B(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) of the 
Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1441-2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II) and 1444-
2(c)(1)(D)(v)(II)) are each amended by inserting ``without regard to 
clause (ii)'' after ``clause (iii)''.
    (b) Section 105B(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 
1444f(c)(1)(B)(iii)(IV)(bb)) is amended by striking ``clause (i)(I)'' 
and inserting ``clauses (i) and (ii)''.
    (c) Section 204(g) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 1446e(g)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting after ``purchase'' the 
        following: ``(less sales under section 407 for unrestricted 
        use)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after ``purchases'' each 
        place it appears the following: ``(less sales under section 407 
        for unrestricted use)''.

                                 <all>
```
*June 13, 2017*

2017-Ohio-4208.]

2017-0611.

#### Ashtabula v. Jones.

Ashtabula App. No. 2016-A-0053, 2017-Ohio-1103. Appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction fails to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 7.02(B), which requires that a memorandum “shall not exceed fifteen numbered pages, exclusive of the table of contents and the certificate of service.” Sua sponte, pages 16 through 18 of the memorandum in support of jurisdiction are stricken.
#### Semsudin Pehlic et al., Respondents, v City of Utica, et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 769]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Grow, J.), entered February 19, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
No. 12-5959.

#### Cook *v.*Reinke, Director, Idaho Department of Correction.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A forthe year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Yemenidjian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

March 31, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from unaudited
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      291
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           7,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          5,418
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,281
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,764)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    126
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       126
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1075 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-011-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 232 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: Prompted by reports of too high a current flow when one generator is deactivated, this action 

requires revising the Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) by inserting certain temporary pages.

Costs:

Minimal - minimal amount of time to copy and insert the pages into the RFM. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: George Schwab