alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, R. Scott Vansant, Chief Financial Officer ofEuramax International, Inc., certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Euramax International, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a)                designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)                disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the period covered by this report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 31, 2005 | By:    | /s/ R. SCOTT VANSANT                    |
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                           | Title: | *Chief Financial Officer and Secretary* |

 

----
# Small Business team receives strategic goals award

/ Published Feb. 22, 2019
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Logistics Agency Director Army Lt. Gen. Darrell K. Williams presented the Strategic Goals Award – Strong Partnerships for the final quarter of fiscal 2018 to the Enterprise Small Business Team, including DLA Land and Maritime’s Office of Small Business Programs, for their efforts in exceeding the agency’s goals over the fiscal year. 

DLA Land and Maritime Office of Small Business Programs members recognized included Coleen McCormick, Jim Secrist, Joshua Anderson, Donna Brino-Blackwell, Shalisa Dunn, Jon Ferguson, Matthew Elliott, Earl Madison, Kevin Scoles and Ryan Snyder. 

                DLA Land and Maritime Small Business                            Small Businesses achievements and strong industry relationships were credited with generating innovative and efficient solutions. Programs like DLA Land and Maritime’s Training, Knowledge and Opportunities seminars helped old and new small businesses learn best practices for working with the federal government. These free sessions were offered several times throughout the year and demonstrated the small business team’s commitment to building strong partnerships. For more information on DLA Small Business visit www.dla.mil/small-business.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Dana ThornburyVIRIN: 190222-D-HV615-100“The team demonstrated exceptional management and execution, which resulted in DLA surpassing small business goals during the period July 1, 2018 through Sept. 20, 2018, as well as achieving record-breaking small business spend,” read the nomination signed by DLA Chief of Staff Kristin French. 

In fiscal 2018, DLA contracts with small businesses were worth an estimated $14.8 billion, nearly $4.3 billion higher than the previous fiscal year. DLA exceeded the small business goal set by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, with an estimated achievement of 38.5 percent of DLA contracts going to small businesses. 

Small Businesses achievements and strong industry relationships were credited with generating innovative and efficient solutions. Programs like DLA Land and Maritime’s Training, Knowledge and Opportunities seminars helped old and new small businesses learn best practices for working with the federal government. These free sessions were offered several times throughout the year and demonstrated the small business team’s commitment to building strong partnerships. 

“Through industry partnerships and public engagement, the Small Business Team [helped] generate new suppliers, resulting in a stronger industrial base, greater competition and higher quality goods at lower cost for the taxpayer,” a portion of the nomination packet read. “The work that the DLA Enterprise Small Business Team [accomplished] through establishing strong partnerships remains vitally important to ensure necessary innovation and creativity continue within the small business community, and most importantly, that lethality and readiness remain paramount in Warfighter support.”
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Kansas Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 35,980 | 44,066 | 43,661
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 38,869 | 35,924 | 31,689 | 28,244 | 25,387 | 23,407 | 20,843 | 18,633 | 17,659 | 15,682
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13,693 | 12,043 | 11,400 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Edward Bradshaw, Appellant, v National Structures, Inc., Respondent. National Structures, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Abl Plumbing & Heating Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. National Sructures, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v Law Brothers Contracting Corporation et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 903]

— Appeal

from an order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Schwerzmann, J), entered November 21, 2002, which granted the motions and cross motion of third-party defendants for leave to amend the third-party answers and the cross motion of defendant for leave to amend the answer to add the affirmative defense of lack of standing and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Jefferson County,

Schwerzmann, J. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
#### Com. v. Settles

06/08/2016

45 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1030
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 14 (Thursday, January 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ES-960-1420-00] ES-48890, Group 26, Illinois


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Illinois

    The plat, in four sheets, of the dependent resurvey of a portion of 
U.S. Survey No. 580, a portion of the west boundary, a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, and the survey of the Locks and Dam No. 27 
Acquisition Boundary, Township 4 North, Range 9 West, and the survey of 
the Locks and Dam No. 27 Acquisition Boundary, Township 4 North, Range 
10 West, both of the Third Principal Meridian, Illinois, will be 
officially filed in Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., 
on February 23, 1998.
    The survey was requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., February 23, 1998.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: January 12, 1998.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 98-1415 Filed 1-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
2017-1541.

#### State v. Tate.

Richland App. No. 17CA19, 2017-Ohio-7311. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### Com. v. Gannaway

03/23/2016

932 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 125 A.3d 464
Exhibit 31.2
                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14


I, Miles Greenberg, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2003, of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 an 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions abut the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's control over
financial reporting; and

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation to the small business issuer's auditors and
the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: October 14, 2003


                                          S/ Miles Greenberg
                                          ------------------
                                          Miles Greenberg
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 10.80  | 10.79  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-41847, 333-84760) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-35284)
on Form S-3 of Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc. of our report dated November
7, 2003, with respect to the financial statements included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003.

/s/ Eisner LLP
---------------
Eisner LLP



New York, New York
December 22, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Pfizer, Inc.; Withdrawal of Approval of NADA's

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval 
of four new animal drug applications (NADA's) held by Pfizer, Inc. The 
NADA's provide for use of oxytetracycline hydrochloride. The sponsor 
requested the withdrawal of approval of the NADA's because the animal 
drug products are no longer manufactured or marketed.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 12, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dianne T. McRae, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (HFV-102), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-0212.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pfizer, Inc., 235 East 42d St., New York, NY 
10017 is the sponsor of NADA 8-696 TM-5 Antibiotic Feed Supplement 
(oxytetracycline), NADA 10-661 Terramycin Egg Formula (oxytetracycline 
hydrochloride), NADA 11-034 Liquimast Solution for Mastitis 
(oxytetracycline hydrochloride), and NADA 13-470 TM-10 Premix 
(oxytetracycline). The animal drug products were subject to review 
under the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Drug 
Efficacy Study Implementation Program, and are currently subject to 
requirements for finalization under that program. Pfizer, Inc., the 
current sponsor, requested withdrawal of approval of the NADA's because 
the animal drug products are no longer manufactured or marketed.
    Therefore, under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food 
and Drugs (21 CFR 5.10) and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary 
Medicine (21 CFR 5.48), and in accordance with Sec. 514.115 Withdrawal 
of approval of applications (21 CFR 514.115), notice is given that 
approvals of NADA's 8-696, 10-661, 11-034, 13-470, and all supplements 
and amendments thereto are hereby withdrawn, effective May 22, 1998.
    These products had not been the subject of a regulation published 
under section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360b). Therefore, an amendment to the animal drug regulations to 
reflect the withdrawal of approvals is not required.

    Dated: April 24, 1998.
Stephen F. Sundlof,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 98-12612 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus PATRICK ALLEN BROWN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR96-418, CA-02-3775-PJM) Submitted: June 10, 2003 Decided: June 30, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick Allen Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Laurie Simms, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Patrick Allen Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), the court’s earlier denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The district court construed the Rule 60(b) motion under § 2255 and denied the motion as successive, noting that Brown would need to seek authorization from this court to file a such a motion. This court may grant a certificate of appealability for the appeal of a § 2255 motion only if the appellant makes a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). Where, as here, a district court dismisses a motion to vacate on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not satisfied either standard. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). We construe Br own’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive motion to3 vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , F.3d , 2003 WL 1949822, at *7 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a second motion to vacate, a movant must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C), 2255 ¶ 8 (2000). Brown’s claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize Brown to file a successive § 2255 application. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 12-979.

#### Weaver, dba Guns & Ammo *v.*Harris.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.