alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1764

To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of the

Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BIDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered,

read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To provide for the extension of certain authority for the

Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court

Police.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 9(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act relating to

4 the policing of the building and grounds of the Supreme

5 Court of the United States,’’ approved August 18, 1949

6 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)), is amended in the first sentence by

7 striking out ‘‘1993’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘1996’’.

Æ
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Sabine Pass, LA Exports to United kingdom Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Sabine Pass, LA Exports to United kingdom Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |         |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,469  | 2,862  | 0       | 0       | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3,410  | 42,027 | 59,619
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 80,881 | 86,946 | 185,510 | 214,855 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
*December 21, 2017*

2017-Ohio-9145.]

2017-1545.

#### State v. Young.

Erie App. No. E-16-003, 2017-Ohio-4476. On appellee’s motion to dismiss. Motion denied. Appellee may file a memorandum in response within 30 days.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 181

To prohibit the export of American black bear viscera, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To prohibit the export of American black bear viscera, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Black Bear Protection

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPORT OF AMERICAN BLACK

7 BEAR VISCERA.

8 The Secretary of Commerce shall exercise the author9 ity the Secretary has under the Export Administration Act

10 of 1979 to prohibit the export from the United States of

11 American black bear viscera.
2

S 181 IS

1 SEC. 3. REPORT BY SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

2 The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the

3 Secretary of the Treasury, shall prepare and submit to

4 the Congress, not later than one hundred eighty days after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act, a report that de6 scribes—

7 (1) the effectiveness of the computerized infor8 mation system or any other system of the Fish and

9 Wildlife Service or the United States Customs Serv10 ice that records data on the importation or expor11 tation of wildlife body parts, specifically of the

12 American black bear, to and from the United States;

13 and

14 (2) any plans of the Fish and Wildlife Service

15 to monitor the illegal movement of, or commercial

16 activity in, American black bear viscera or other

17 American black bear body parts.

18 SEC. 4. UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE.

19 The United States Trade Representative shall discuss

20 the issues involving trade in American black bear viscera

21 with the appropriate representatives of those countries

22 trading with the United States who are determined jointly

23 by the Secretaries of Commerce and Interior to be the

24 leading importers of American black bear viscera.
3

S 181 IS

1 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

2 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘American black bear

3 viscera’’ means the gallbladder or any internal organs of

4 an American black bear (Ursus Americanus).

Æ
No. 12-8069.

#### Gonzalez-Aguilera *v.*Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
0

20406080

100120140160180200

PPB

Date

Maximum 1‐Hr SO2 at Columbia Monitor

Note ‐ All data through 6‐30‐2011 has been quality assured by the State of New Jersey
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1845 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1845

    To authorize the President to transfer defense articles out of 
     Department of Defense stocks to the Government of Bosnia and 
                              Hercegovina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

Mr. DeConcini (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the President to transfer defense articles out of 
     Department of Defense stocks to the Government of Bosnia and 
                              Hercegovina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO ASSIST BOSNIA-HERCEGOVINA.

    Section 548 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and 
Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1994 (Public Law 103-87) is 
amended by amending subsections (a) and (b) to read as follows:
    ``(a) Congress makes the following findings:
            ``(1) In the absence of adequate measures to maintain 
        international peace and security, continued application to the 
        Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina of the mandatory 
        international arms embargo imposed by the United Nations 
        Security Council prior to the armed attack on Bosnia and 
        Hercegovina undermines that government's right of individual or 
        collective defense and, therefore, contravenes Article 51 of 
        the United Nations Charter.
            ``(2) The right of self-defense of Bosnia-Hercegovina under 
        Article 51 of the United Nations Charter includes the right to 
        request military assistance from other countries and to receive 
        such assistance if offered.
            ``(3) The President should provide appropriate military 
        assistance to the Government of Bosnia and Hercegovina upon 
        receipt from that government of a request for assistance in 
        exercising its right to self-defense under Article 51 of the 
        United Nations Charter.
    ``(b)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or treaty, the 
President is authorized to transfer to the Government of Bosnia and 
Hercegovina, for use solely by forces under its direct control, without 
reimbursement, defense articles from the stocks of the Department of 
Defense of an aggregate value not to exceed $50,000,000 in fiscal year 
1994.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term `defense article' 
has the meaning given that term by section 47(3) of the Arms Export 
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2794 note).''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      747
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        141
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,186
<PP&E>                                           2,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,617
<BONDS>                                          1,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,700
<SALES>                                          2,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,256
<CGS>                                            2,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     44
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 25
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        25
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-7886.

#### Maestas *v.*Utah.

Sup. Ct. Utah. Certiorari denied.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1621

AN ACT

To revise certain authorities relating to Pershing

Hall, France.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1621

AN ACT

To revise certain authorities relating to Pershing Hall,

France.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1621 ES

1 SECTION 1. REVISION OF AUTHORITY RELATING TO PER2 SHING HALL, FRANCE.

3 (a) INCREASE IN TRANSFER AUTHORITY.—Sub4 section (d)(2) of section 403 of the Veterans’ Benefits

5 Programs Improvement Act of 1991 (36 U.S.C.

6 493(d)(2)) is amended by striking out ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and

7 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘$1,250,000’’.

8 (b) DISPOSAL AUTHORITY.—Such section is further

9 amended—

10 (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub11 section (f); and

12 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the follow13 ing new subsection (e):

14 ‘‘(e) DISPOSAL AUTHORITY.—(1) Subject to para15 graph (2), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may sell or

16 otherwise dispose of all right, title, and interest of the

17 United States in and to Pershing Hall.

18 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may not sell or otherwise dispose

19 of Pershing Hall under this subsection unless the Sec20 retary determines that—

21 ‘‘(A) the sale or other disposal is in the best in22 terests of the United States; and

23 ‘‘(B) the consideration to be paid for such sale

24 or other disposal is acceptable.

25 ‘‘(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the

26 Secretary shall deposit in the general fund of the Treasury
3

•S 1621 ES

1 of the United States an amount equal to the amount of

2 any cash consideration paid to the United States for the

3 sale or other disposal of Pershing Hall under this sub4 section.

5 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may utilize an amount not to ex6 ceed $250,000 of such cash consideration to recoup the

7 cost of administrative expenses incurred by the Secretary

8 with respect to the sale or other disposal of Pershing

9 Hall.’’.

10 (c) CLOSING OF REVOLVING FUND UPON DISPOSAL

11 OF PERSHING HALL.—Subsection (d) of such section is

12 amended by adding at the end the following new para13 graph (7):

14 ‘‘(7) Upon sale or other disposal of all right, title,

15 and interest of the United States in and to Pershing Hall

16 under subsection (e), the Secretary shall—

17 ‘‘(A) pay out of funds in or proceeds from the

18 sale or redemption of interest-bearing obligations

19 credited to the Revolving Fund all outstanding liabil20 ities of the Revolving Fund, including any unpaid

21 expenses of the Revolving Fund and reimbursements

22 of any funds transferred to the Revolving Fund

23 under paragraph (2);

24 ‘‘(B) transfer any funds that remain in the Re25 volving Fund after the payment of the liabilities de-
4

•S 1621 ES

1 scribed in subparagraph (A) into the general fund of

2 the Treasury of the United States; and

3 ‘‘(C) close the Revolving Fund.’’.

Passed the Senate November 11 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Indonesia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Indonesia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | -----
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |       |     | 1,118 | 477 | 456 | 1,218
|2022                                                                                                                              |     | 717 |     |     |     |     |       | 967 | 509   | 625 | 505 | 3,256
|2023                                                                                                                              | 805 |     |     |     |     |     | 1,097 | 766 | 489   |     |     |      
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 432 |     |       |     |       |     |     |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-1448.

#### State ex rel. McClure v. Noble.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
March 15, 2013

No. 12-6574.

#### Kearney *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46.1.
#### Susan Reinhard, Respondent, v Connaught Tower Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[51 NYS3d 412]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered February 1, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a nonjury trial, found defendant Connaught Tower Corporation liable and awarded plaintiff certain maintenance payments, interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the finding of liability and award vacated, the complaint dismissed, and the matter remanded for a hearing and determination as to Connaught’s attorneys’ fees. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 3, *4322016, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff’s motion for reargument, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The finding of liability against Connaught, the owner of a cooperative building in which plaintiff purchased shares, was not based on a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). The evidence failed to show that the odor of cigarettes rendered plaintiff’s apartment uninhabitable, breached the proprietary lease, or caused plaintiff to be constructively evicted. In particular, plaintiff’s evidence failed to show that the odor was present on a consistent basis and that it was sufficiently pervasive as to materially affect the health and safety of occupants *(see Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, 47*NY2d 316, 327-328 [1979], *cert denied*444 US 992 [1979]). Plaintiff’s witnesses testified that they smelled smoke in the apartment on a handful of occasions over the years, and the source of the smoke was never identified. Moreover, plaintiff lived in Connecticut, near her workplace, and only intended to stay in the apartment occasionally *(see Leventritt v 520 E. 86th St.,*266 AD2d 45, 45-46 [1st Dept 1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 760 [2000]; *Halkedis v Two E. End Ave. Apt. Corp.,*161 AD2d 281, 282 [1st Dept 1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 711 [1990]).

Plaintiff correctly conceded at oral argument that her claim of constructive eviction is time-barred *(see Kent v 534 E. 11th St.,*80 AD3d 106, 111-112 [1st Dept 2010]).

Connaught is entitled to attorneys’ fees pursuant to CPLR 3220. Accordingly, we remand for a hearing and determination as to those fees.

Concur—Richter, J.P., Andrias, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of NovaStar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Lance Anderson,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
      May 26, 2009
                
                /s/
      W. Lance AndersonW.
      Lance AndersonChairman
      of the Board of Directors andChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          10,366
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  219,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,276
<INVENTORY>                                     34,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               394,598
<PP&E>                                       3,004,736
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,486,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,255,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          418,086
<BONDS>                                        664,786
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     792,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,255,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               442,747
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (320)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,323
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,940
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,940
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 12-7955.

#### Delossantos *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.