alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,437
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,569
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    122,247
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        616,654
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 819,601
<DEPOSITS>                                     702,952
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,602
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,930
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  99,047
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,556
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,129
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,061
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,746
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,957
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,043
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,703
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 18,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,387
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,736
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,736
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.24
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,356
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,026
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   509
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,461
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      440
<RECOVERIES>                                       111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,492
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0001048

20-JUN-2013

10:00 AM
# DLA Distribution Commanding Officer's Thanksgiving Message

/ Published Nov. 27, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Teammates, 

Nearly 400 years ago, two different cultures, on the dawn of profound and permanent change, shared an autumn feast. The Pilgrims inaugurated Thanksgiving after surviving their first winter at Plymouth, Mass. Members of the Wampanoag American Indian tribal entity, roughly half of whom still reside in Massachusetts, played a lead role in this historic encounter, and they had been essential to the survival of the colonists during the pilgrims’ first year. General George Washington proclaimed the first national day of thanksgiving during the early struggles of the republic, and President Abraham Lincoln later revived the tradition following the darkest days of the Civil War, proclaiming the last Thursday in November a day of thanksgiving.  

Each year on Thanksgiving, as we gather with families and friends, we give thanks for our many blessings. As we celebrate the holiday with our own traditions and customs, I ask that you keep our Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines in your hearts and prayers. Remember both the bonds that tie us together and the sacrifices our troops make to defend our way of life.   Remember to bring those away from their families into your gatherings so no one celebrates alone this holiday season! We are One Team, One Family!

The Sunday following Thanksgiving is always the busiest travel day of the year in the United States. As you travel, remember to be vigilant, drive defensively, watch your speed, use your seatbelts, and do not drive or let others drive while fatigued or under the influence of alcohol! We need everyone as we move into the challenges of the New Year! 

Ms. Gonzales and I, and our families, wish to thank all of you for your dedicated support to the warfighter, and wish you and your families a happy and safe Thanksgiving.  

HOOYAH Distribution!

Kevin JonesRDML, SC, USN
```

[Federal Register: February 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 25)]
[Notices]               
[Page 6250]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08fe10-105]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6868]

 
Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the U.S. State 
Department--Overseas Security Advisory Council on February 24 and 25 at 
the U.S. Department of State and the Boeing Company, Arlington, 
Virginia. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed 
to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate 
security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion 
of trade secrets and proprietary commercial information that is 
privileged and confidential, and will discuss law enforcement 
investigative techniques and procedures. The agenda will include 
updated committee reports, a global threat overview, and other matters 
relating to private sector security policies and protective programs 
and the protection of U.S. business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: January 15, 2010.
Jeffrey W. Culver,
Director of the Diplomatic Security Service, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-2684 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| \s\  James H. Moore      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James  H. Moore          |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| May 15,  2008       |   |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by MinesManagement, Inc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH CARTER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 143 EM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of March , 2020, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
#### Randolph Wayloo, Appellant, v Mohammed J. Sheikh et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 338]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated June 21, 2002, which (1) denied his motion, inter alia, to vacate an order *630of the same court dated December 19, 2000, entered on his default, granting the defendant Miriam Fearon a conditional order of preclusion, to vacate an order of the same court dated March 16, 2001, entered on his default, granting the defendant Miriam Fearon summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her, and for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Mohammed J. Sheikh, and (2) granted the cross motion of the defendant Mohammed J. Sheikh to dismiss the complaint as abandoned insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order dated June 21, 2002, is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident. The defendant Mohammed J. Sheikh did not answer or appear. Further, the plaintiff defaulted on two motions by the defendant Miriam Fearon, which resulted in an order granting that defendant a conditional order of preclusion and an order granting that defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her. The plaintiff moved, inter alia, to vacate his defaults and for leave to enter a default judgment against Sheikh. Sheikh cross-moved for an order dismissing the complaint as abandoned insofar as asserted against him. The Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s motion and granted Sheikh’s cross motion. We affirm.

In support of those branches of his motion which were to vacate his defaults, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for his defaults *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Kaplinsky v Mazor,*307 AD2d 916 [2003]; *Parker v City of New York,*272 AD2d 310 [2000]; *Matter of United States Auto. Assn. v Steiger,*191 AD2d 496 [1993]) or a meritorious cause of action *(see Sicari v Hung Yuen Wong,*286 AD2d 489 [2001]; *Sharp v Lebron,*282 AD2d 733 [2001]; *Gomez v Lotero,*273 AD2d 198 [2000]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied such relief.

The plaintiff also failed to demonstrate good cause why he did not seek to enter a judgment against Sheikh until almost three years after Sheikh’s default in answering or appearing *(see*CPLR 3215 [c]; *Opia v Chukwu,*278 AD2d 394 [2000]; *Richards v Lewis,*243 AD2d 615 [1997]; *Ewart v Maimonides Med. Ctr.,*239 AD2d 543 [1997]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as abandoned insofar as asserted against Shiekh.

In light of the dismissal of the complaint in its entirety, the plaintiff’s remaining contentions need not be reached. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
# Subsistence, DLA Distribution support Pacer Goose mission 

/ Published Aug. 20, 2019
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain, in partnership with DLA Distribution Norfolk, Virginia, provides support to the Air Force's annual re-supply mission, Pacer Goose Sustainment 2019, at Thule Air Base, Greenland.

During the months of July and August each year, the Pacer Goose mission occurs to ensure much needed food supplies arrive and waste is removed from the remote base.

Patricia Scott, garrison feeding division chief considers the mission critical for her team.

“The exercise, which operates every summer, is an opportunity to ship by sea-van a container of our longer-shelf life frozen items, heavier canned items, and dry items to fill up Thule’s storage spaces for the upcoming winter in a more economical manner,” she said.

Cost savings to the customer is a benefit of the mission.

Throughout the year, Scott’s team coordinates with DLA Distribution Norfolk to airlift approximately 20,000 pounds of perishable and non-perishable food items to air base every week at an estimated cost of $1.50 a pound, she said.  

“But during Pacer Goose, the cost of a container is about $3,000, and can fit an estimated 30,000 pounds,” Scott said.

DLA Distribution Marine Cargo Specialist Isai J. Vazquez says the goal of the mission is to provide a year’s worth of sustainment material to Thule Air Base during the small but critical window for the region. 

“We send the ship this time of year because the ice at the port there is at its weakest,”

Vazquez said. “Once we finish loading the ship in Norfolk, it will meet up with a Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker. Once they rendezvous, the icebreaker leads into the port.”

Scott describes the mission as Christmas in July for her customer.

“Along with other menu items, the Subsistence prime vendor shipped 3,975 cases of turkeys, beef shoulders, pies, cakes and other items to the remote base in preparation for their upcoming Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday meals,” she said.

Unofficial talks between the Air Force, the Military Sealift Command and both DLA entities began last December, but it was not until March that the initial planning started to ensure a mid-July departure out of Norfolk.

Larry Munoz, DLA Troop Support customer service specialist said there is a combination of support that goes into this mission. MSC contracts the vessel and DLA Distribution loads it at Naval Station Norfolk, however Troop Support’s role is most critical to the success of the mission, he said.

“My role at DLA Troop Support is to coordinate with our customer at Thule, ensuring that they provide the purchase order on time, Munoz said. “And [coordinating with] the Subsistence prime vendor to ensure that they do not foresee any issues with the fill rate for the amount of product that is being required, and a timeline to deliver so that nothing falls through the cracks.”
S. 2087

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-four

An Act

To extend the time period for compliance with the Nutrition Labeling and Education

Act of 1990 for certain food products packaged prior to August 8, 1994.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That before

August 8, 1994, sections 403(q) and 403(r)(2) of the Federal Food,

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the provision of section 403(i) of such

Act added by section 7(2) of the Nutrition Labeling and Education

Act of 1990, shall not apply with respect to a food product which

is contained in a package for which the label was printed before

May 8, 1994 (or before August 8, 1994, in the case of a juice

or milk food product if the person responsible for the labeling

of such food product exercised due diligence in obtaining before

such date labels which are in compliance with such sections 403(q)

and 403(r)(2) and such provision of section 403(i)), if, before June

15, 1994, the person who introduces or delivers for introduction

such food product into interstate commerce submits to the Secretary

of Health and Human Services a certification that such person

will comply with this section and will comply with such sections

403(q) and 403(r)(2) and such provision of section 403(i) after August

8, 1994.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

137516

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137516 COA: 286930 Oakland CC: 07-215342-FH REGINALD DARNELL BINGHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of March 23, 2009, the applica tion for leave to appeal the September 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pend ing the decision in People
v Idziak (Docket No. 137301). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 31, 2009, 484 Mich 5 49 (2009), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak , 484 Mich 549 (2009).
EX-12
                              RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST I
                                                                MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING I, L.P.
                                                                 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                          (dollars in thousands)



                                   FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                    DECEMBER 26, 2003                  DECEMBER 27, 2002                  DECEMBER 28, 2001
                           ---------------------------------    --------------------------------   ---------------------------------
                            MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                              PREFERRED         PREFERRED          PREFERRED        PREFERRED         PREFERRED        PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.    CAPITAL TRUST I  FUNDING I, L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST I   FUNDING I, L.P.
                           ---------------   ---------------    ---------------  ---------------   ---------------   ---------------

<S>                             <C>                <C>            <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>

Earnings                          $ 21,972          $ 25,623           $ 21,972         $ 25,654          $ 21,972          $ 25,745
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========


Fixed charges                     $      -          $      -           $      -         $      -          $      -          $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution requirements          21,313            21,972             21,313           21,972            21,313            21,972
                                  --------          --------           --------         --------          --------          --------

Total combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements        $ 21,313          $ 21,972           $ 21,313         $ 21,972          $ 21,313          $ 21,972
                                  ========          ========           ========         ========          ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
 fixed charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                         1.03              1.17               1.03             1.17              1.03              1.17



</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 14, 2006
    
    /s/ ANTHONY F. EARLEY, JR.

Anthony F. Earley, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of 
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF BAERAIR, INC. Respondent FAA CASENO. 2011S0150234 (Civil Penalty Proceeding) ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE Honorable J.E. Sullivan Hearing Date: NOT YET ASSIGNED Hearing Location: NOT YET ASSIGNED 

# RECEIVED APR 29 2014 

## HEARING DOCKET

RESPONDENT'S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF APPEARANCE PLEASE TAKENOTICEthat effective onJuly 1, 2014, the new mailing address for Gregory S. Winton, Esq. and Jared M. Allen, Esq. ofThe Aviation Law Firm will be as follows: The Aviation Law Firm 1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway Suite 300 Annapolis, MD 21401 Kindly update the record according!y. Dated: April24, 2014 Respectfully Submitted, The Aviation Law Firm 

# l 11 /

..

### ;;~·"! / ,**~1,,0** (Vl.**~e"""'l**

J?**~ ~ed**  M. Allen, Esq

.

.**~** / The Aviation LawFirm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (866) 568-9886 Counsel for RespondentCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that I have this date sent via U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid, an original and one copy ofthe foregoing Respondent'sNotice of Change Of Appearance addressed to: ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2Wl000 And, further, that I have this date sent by U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, a copy ofthe foregoing addressed to: ONE COPY Vincent Bennett Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ANE-7 12 NewEngland Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 ATTN: Vincent J. Bennett Tel: (781) 238-8044 Fax: (781) 238-7055 ONE COPY Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 Tel: (202) 366-6941 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Dated: Apri124, 2014

ed M.· Allen, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm One Research Court, Suite 450 Rockville, MD 20850 Tel: (301) 294-8550 Fax: (866) 568-9886
#### Com. v. Pearson

03/30/2016

713 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 492
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AESP, Inc.
North Miami, Florida We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (333-105727) and Form S-3 (333-107501) of our report dated
March 23, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule
of AESP, Inc., appearing in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Our report contains an explanatory
paragraph regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. Miami, FloridaMarch 26, 2004BDO Seidman, LLP
#### Com. v. Rosen

10/07/2015

488 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 444