alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                             
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Thailand (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2016-1327.

#### State v. Davic.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-1000, 2016-Ohio-4883. Reported at 147 Ohio St.3d 1508, 2017-Ohio-261, 67 N.E.3d 824. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of Boulder Capital Opportunties II,
      Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Michael J. Delaney, Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:
      February 5, 2007  By:  /s/
      Michael J. Delaney


Chief Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

p0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139988

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139988 COA: 285138 Kent CC: 07-008657-FC JEFFREY SCOTT VANVELS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, William B. Thornton, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mid-State
Raceway, Inc. and Subsidiary (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2004


William B. Thornton
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 99.2

                            MICROPAC INDUSTRIES, INC.

                             CERTICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Micropac  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  August 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick Cefalu, CFO of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




 /s/ Patrick Cefalu
-----------------------------
Patrick Cefalu, CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 5.85   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8680.

#### Nicolas *v.*United States.

C. A. llth Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Abax Lotus Ltd. et al., Appellants, v China Mobile Media Technology Inc. et al., Defendants, and Zhang Zhengyu, Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 29]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered December 14, 2015, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the claims asserted against defendant Zhang, and granted Zhang’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims against him, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny Zhang’s motion for summary judgment, and reinstate the claims asserted against him, and to grant plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on its claim for liquidated damages in connection with the breach of section 2 (e) of the Investors Rights Agreement, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ claims based on its finding that the indemnification provision in the Investors Rights Agreement is limited to third-party claims. Rather, the provision, which states that indemnification applies to any loss “whether or not arising out of any claims by or on behalf of any third party,” and includes a distinct section referencing third-party claims, clearly implies that the parties intended the provision to apply to certain intra-party claims *(see Sagittarius Broadcasting Corp. v Evergreen Media Corp.,*243 AD2d 325, 326 [1st Dept 1997]).

The court also erred to the extent it declined to find that defendant Dr. Zhang could be held individually liable, either directly or as an indemnitor, for certain alleged breaches under the Investors Rights Agreement, to which he, along with another “Controlling Shareholder,” is a named party. The agreement set forth certain obligations on Dr. Zhang, including, as relevant here, to cause each “Group Company” to fulfill the covenants and agreements in section 2, and to jointly and severally indemnify plaintiffs for losses in connection with any breach of a covenant or agreement in the Investors Rights Agreement.

Given the above, the claims are reinstated, and since the rec*536ord evidence shows that Dr. Zhang breached his section 2.2 (e) obligation to cause the Group Company to retain a qualified accounting firm, and that the parties agreed to liquidated damages in the event the accounting firm was not hired within the requisite time frame, plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on their claim for liquidated damages in connection with this breach. On the other hand, issues of fact exist with respect to the remaining claims, including the claim seeking indemnification in connection with the Group Company’s section 7.1 failure to redeem warrants tendered by plaintiffs. Given the strict manner in which indemnification clauses are construed, especially when imposing obligations similar to a guaranty *(see Weissman v Sinorm Deli,*88 NY2d 437 [1996]), it is not clear, as a matter of law, that the parties intended the section 8 indemnification provision to encompass the Group Company’s failure to redeem the warrants.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.
# Spring-like day draws over 125 participants to Frosty Bear 5K

/ Published Feb. 7, 2019

An event notorious for being rescheduled because of snow and ice went off amid near 70 degree temps and a sunny sky Feb. 6.

The annual Frosty Bear 5K run/walk drew over 125 McNamara Headquarters Complex employees from their desks, including moms and dads with strollers and those just wanting to take a walk in the unseasonably warm weather. 

Defense Logistics Agency Energy and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency swept the competition. Top male and female runners were DLA Energy’s Alex Cano and DTRA’s Marcus Young. Diana Angstadt from DTRA and Louise Hansen from DLA Energy took second place. Young and Hansen are repeat winners, having taken first place in last year’s Frosty Bear. All winners received a gift card from Metro Run & Walk. 

The event is organized by Morale Welfare and Recreation and the HQC Fitness Staff. The next 5K run/walk is the HQC Spring Fling scheduled for April 10.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mines Management, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Glenn M. Dobbs  Glenn M. Dobbs Chief Executive Officer Date:  August 11, 2006    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mines Management, Inc. and will be retained by Mines Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 8.37   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# I am DLA Energy

/ Published Sept. 12, 2019
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, 
I am Staff Sgt. Andrew Taylor. After serving on Air Force active duty for over eight years as a 2F0X1 Fuels troop, I transitioned into the Air Force Reserves and elected to become an Individual Mobilized Augmentee. As a student, IMA allows me to attend class during the school year and condense all of my annual Reserve training in about one month. 

Once selected, I was assigned to Defense Logistics Agency Energy Hawaii on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam as a quality assurance representative. As a QAR, I am responsible for validating proper procurement of Energy assets, which includes fuels of various grades, as well as cryogenic products like liquid oxygen and nitrogen. Primarily, I verify product samples are drawn and tested accurately ensuring test results meet the specifications outlined in the contract between DLA and the supplier.

In July, I got my first taste of the QAR life when I arrived on Oahu. I jumped in learning the local fuel storage and pipeline layout, the Pearl Harbor fuels lab, and Navy fuels operations. I shadowed Daniel Muranaka, a veteran DLA Energy QAR, for on-the-job training where our first main task was verifying a pipeline shipment of jet aviation fuel injected with additives from a nearby commercial refinery. 

One late Sunday evening, we arrived at the refinery to visually witness a selection of fuel tests, checking quality for anti-icing agent levels, flashpoint, appearance and cloud point. These tests are critical because bad fuel in an aircraft can be catastrophic. Once those tests passed inspection, Daniel gave the refinery approval to send the first batch of fuel through the pipeline to a distribution hub near JBPHH. About four hours later, not long before dawn, we pulled a two gallon sample from the end point and tested it to make sure the fuel was clean and uncontaminated.

It was then we noticed a problem. Part of the supplier’s pipeline maintenance is to periodically clean, but this process left some residual water and sediment. Not only could sediment in the fuel cause damage to an engine, but water in the pipeline was actively pulling out the anti-icing agent which is essential at higher altitudes. Over the next two days, we witnessed the contractor flush the pipeline several times with clean fuel, pulling and testing samples each time, but the fuel could not meet contract specifications. In the end, we declined the shipment and worked with the contractor to find a way to fully flush the pipeline.

Without Daniel’s or another QAR’s oversight testing fuels throughout the procurement process, bad product could enter the system and endanger lives. When I become a fully qualified QAR IMA, I will be responsible for procurements across the Pacific region and be deployed anywhere the Warfighter needs fuels support. 

It is a QAR’s duty to ensure the specifications of the contract are met anytime and anyplace. I’m proud to be able to be a part of that.
#### Michael S. Frankel, Appellant, v Samuel Hirsch, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 863]-

In an action, inter alia, for an accounting, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated June 20, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to direct him to appear for an examination before trial and denied *400that branch of his cross motion which was, in effect, to strike the answer and for an inquest on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the motion which was to direct the plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial is denied, that branch of the cross motion which was, in effect, to strike the answer and for an inquest on the issue of damages is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for an inquest on the issue of damages.

As a result of the defendant’s failure to fully comply with a conditional order of preclusion dated September 25, 2001, that conditional order became absolute *(see Correa v Tscherne,*296 AD2d 476 [2002]; *Jenkinson v Naccarato,*286 AD2d 420 [2001]). To avoid the adverse impact of the conditional order of preclusion, the defendant was required to either comply with the order or to demonstrate an excusable default and a meritorious defense *(see Jenkinson v Naccarato, supra).*Since the defendant neither complied with the order nor demonstrated the necessary criteria to excuse his failure to do so, the proper remedy was for the court to grant that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to strike his answer and for an inquest on the issue of damages *(see Correa v Tscherne, supra).*

Furthermore, as a result of his default, the defendant forfeited his right to take the plaintiffs deposition *(see Reynolds Sec. v Underwriters Bank & Trust Co.,*44 NY2d 568, 573 [1978]). Thus, it was error to direct the plaintiff to appear for an examination before trial. Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.