alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134429 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134429 

 COA: 277030 

Saginaw CC: 05-026206-FH 

GERALD MARTIN GWIZDALA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | 7.02   | --     | --     | --     | --     |        | --     | --     | 7.22  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.92   | 7.87   | 10.40  | 6.24   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Moore

110,170

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-7758.

#### Marin-Castano *v.*United States.

C. A, 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CHARLES J. CASOLARO 

ERICI.SUSSMAN 

THECIAC.VOULO 

CASOLARO SUSSMAN, LLP 

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 

1050 FRANKLIN AVENUE - SUITE 402' 

GARDEN CITY, NEW YORK 11530 

TELEPHONE: (516) 248-1399 

FACSIMILE: (516) 248-2257 

r\'"pT CFIR-':3P0RW!0N 

OF COUNSEL 

GREGORY J. GALLO 

LELAND L. GREENE 

JOSEPH NOCELLA,JR 

PATRICK L. POESCHL 

RAYMOND S. VOULO 

March 24, 2010 

FIRST CLASS MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC - 430 ' 

Wilbur Wright building - Suite 2W1000 

Re: FAA Docket Number.: CPE10EA0002 

DMS: FAA-2010-0191 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

This firm represents Empire Airways in connection to the above-referenced 

docket numbers. Submitted herewith is the Respondent's Answer and Certificate of 

Service. /. . 

Thank you. 

Very truly yours, 

ES J. CASOLARO, ESQ 

CJC/es 

cc: Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Empire Airways 

2009EA110039 

Hon. Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

K 3') 2010 

ANSWER 

EMPIRE AIRWAYS, by its Counsel, Casolaro Sussman, LLP, hereby files its 

Answer pursuant to Rule 209 of the Rules of Practice (14 C.F.R. 13.209) and states the 

following: 

1. Denies 

2. Admits 

3. Admits 

4. Admits that the wheel assembly on the aircraft was re-assembled on or about 

April 8, 2009. 

5. Admits 

6. Denies 

7. denies 

8. Denies, except admits that the aircraft was involved in an incident on June 1, 

2009. 

9. Admit 
10. Admit 

11. Denies 

12. Denies 

13. Denies 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 

1. Empire Airways, at all relevant times herein, was not the owner or operator of a 

Diamond DA-20 aircraft, identification number N383CA ("the aircraft"). 

2. No causal relationship exists between the repair performed on or about April 8, 

2009 and the incident which occurred on June 1, 2009. 

If it is determined that any of the alleged violations occurred, it is submitted that a 

civil penalty in the amount of $20,000.00 is unwarranted. 

Dated: Garden City, New York 

March 12, 2010 

CASOLARO SUSSMAN, LLP 

By: Charles J. Oogojaro, Esq. 

1050 Franklin Avenue, Suite 402 

Garden City, New York 11530 

(516)-248-1399 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the forgoing Answer has been placed this date in the United 

States mail, postage prepaid, first class mail, to: 

Zachary Berman, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, New York 1143 4 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC - 430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2014 

Hon. Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C, 20590 

Dated: March 24, 2010 

Attorney for Empire Airways 

1050 Franklin Avenue, Suite 402 

Garden City, New York 11530
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1849 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1849

To require the Federal Government to incarcerate or to reimburse State 
  and local governments for the cost of incarcerating criminal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

  Mr. Graham (for himself, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Mack, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. 
   Bryan, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. McCain, and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Government to incarcerate or to reimburse State 
  and local governments for the cost of incarcerating criminal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal Aliens Federal 
Responsibility Act of 1994''.

SEC. 2. INCARCERATION OF OR PAYMENT FOR CRIMINAL ALIENS BY THE FEDERAL 
              GOVERNMENT.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, ``criminal alien who has been 
convicted of a felony and is incarcerated in a State or local 
correctional facility'' means an alien who--
            (1)(A) is in the United States in violation of the 
        immigration laws; or
            (B) is deportable or excludable under the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.); and
            (2) has been convicted of a felony under State or local law 
        and incarcerated in a correctional facility of the State or a 
        subdivision of the State.
    (b) Federal Custody.--At the request of a State or political 
subdivision of a State, the Attorney General shall--
            (1)(A) take custody of a criminal alien who has been 
        convicted of a felony and is incarcerated in a State or local 
        correctional facility; and
            (B) provide for the imprisonment of the criminal alien in a 
        Federal prison in accordance with the sentence of the State 
        court; or
            (2) enter into a contractual arrangement with the State or 
        local government to compensate the State or local government 
        for incarcerating alien criminals for the duration of their 
        sentences.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10019

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN JOSEPH ARCHULETA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director, 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:96-CV-12-C

- - - - - - - - - -

February 19, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner John Joseph Archuleta, No. 689511, appeals

the dismissal of his claims against defendant “Dr. Adam” pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e and the entry of summary judgment in favor

of the other defendants to the suit. Having reviewed the record

and the briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM. Archuleta’s motion for

injunctive relief is DENIED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
No. 12-6982.

#### Davis *v.*Farley, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
### Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future) 12/21/2010 07:53:26



### Query Parameters:

### 12/21/2010 07:53:26

Carrier 

### Regular Totals (Operators)

Excludes FAA Held Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 49

ACA AIR CANADA 19

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 901

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 31

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 2

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 6

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 21

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 8

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 31

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 1

POE PORTER AIRLINES 14

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
No. 12-8302.

#### Glave *v.*Glebe, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29723-29724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-538-000]


Midwestern Gas Transmission; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

May 26, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 12, 1998, Midwestern Gas Transmission 
Company (Midwestern), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in 
Docket No. CP98-538-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to construct and operate a new 
sales tap to serve a new industrial customer, Grain Processing 
Corporation (GPC) in Daviess County, Indiana, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Midwesten proposes to: (1) Install an 8-inch hot tap on its 30-inch 
diameter in Knox County, Indiana; (2) install a 2.84-inch diameter 
lateral line that will extend from Knox County to a new grain 
processing plant in Daviess County, Indiana; and (3) install a meter 
station

[[Page 29724]]

on a site provided by GPC. Midwestern states that it will own, operate 
and maintain the hot tap, interconnecting pipeline, meter station and 
the electronic gas measurement equipment. The cost of this project is 
estimated at $2,760,000 for which Midwestern will be reimbursed by GPC.
    Midwestern states that the addition of the proposed sales tap is 
not expected to have any significant impact on its peak day and annual 
deliveries. Midwestern continues that there is sufficient capacity to 
accomplish deliveries at the sales tap without detriment or 
disadvantage to Midwestern's other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14356 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Cite as Melvin v. Unknown, 2010-Ohio-4232.]

Court of Claims of Ohio

The Ohio Judicial Center 

65 South Front Street, Third Floor 

Columbus, OH 43215 

614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 

www.cco.state.oh.us 

EDWARD L. MELVIN II 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

UNKNOWN 

 Defendant 

Case No. 2010-03614-AD 

Deputy Clerk Daniel R. Borchert 

ENTRY OF DISMISSAL

{¶ 1} On March 2, 2010, this court issued an entry dismissing the City of 

Springboro as defendant and requiring the plaintiff to name a state entity as party 

defendant by filing an amended complaint on or before April 1, 2010. A check of the 

docket reveals the plaintiff has failed to comply with this court’s entry of March 2, 2010. 

Therefore, plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The court shall absorb the 

court costs of this case. 

 ________________________________ 

 DANIEL R. BORCHERT 

 Deputy Clerk 

Entry cc: 

Edward L. Melvin II 

2566 Rockcastle Court 
Case No. 2010-03614-AD - 2 - ENTRY

Case No. 2010-03614-AD - 2 - ENTRY

Miamisburg, Ohio 45342 

 

DRB/laa 

Filed 5/4/10 

Sent to S.C. reporter 9/2/10
No. 12-536.

#### McCutcheon et al. *v.*Federal Election Commission.

Appeal from D. C. D. C. Probable jurisdiction noted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       465,247,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                 143,843,000
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             609,090,000
<CASH>                                       6,778,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                          24,399,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      86,995,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             895,303,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            134,269,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                        322,265,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       21,244,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             53,685,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       911,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 269,474,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               895,303,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 110,498,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,061,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           1,882,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                               9,300,000
<BENEFITS>                                  54,976,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 34,862,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        17,833,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,021,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,838,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,183,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,183,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.97
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              89,325,000
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             89,551,000
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 12-7139.

#### Rios *v.*United States and Alvarado *v.*United States

(Reported below: 477 Fed. Appx. 209);

(691 F. 3d 592). C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | --     | 2.96   | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |       
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 2.78   | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7732.

#### Valencia Mendoza *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7964.

#### Oliveira *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
ROCW ADKiNS 

STATE REPRESENTATIVE 

99th Legislative District 

PO. Box 688 

Sandy Clook, Kentucky 41 171 

Office: (606) 928-0407 

Home: (606) 738-4242 

C 5 

I-LOUSE OF REPRESENTKrIVES 

I-IIOUSE MAJORITY FL-OOR LEADER 

July 25, 2011 

STATE CAPITOL 

Room 304 

Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 

(502) 564-7460 

CAPITOL ANNEX 

Room 309 

(502) 564-5565 

Fax: (502) 564-1 687 

The Honorable Lisa P. Jackson 

Administrator 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Ms. Jackson: 

I am writing in response to your agency's draft 3168 rules regarding cooling water intakes at power plants. I am 

writing as Majority Floor Leader of the Kentucky House of Representatives, and I want to reiterate the comments of the 

Governor of Kentucky, Steven L. Beshear, in his letter of February 7, 2011. 

I speak to this issue because I have introduced numerous pieces of legislation dealing with energy 

independence. I am the past Cha~rman of the Southern States Energy Board, a board with a mission to enhance 

economlc development and the quality of life in the South through innovations in energy and environmental policies, 

programs, and technologies. 

Your comments in previous letters state that the rules proposal would "reflect a common-sense approach that 

reasonably accommodates site-specific circumstances while minimizing adverse environmental impact." Therefore, I 

urge you to consider the costs of implementing these regulation changes for the affected industries and the rising cost 

of electricity to the consumers against what environmental improvements may be gained. 

For more than 30 years, the EPA and the states have worked together to meet requirements for cooling water 

intake structures at power plants and manufacturing facilities to reflect the best available technology. I believe we can 

continue to work together to protect our industries, our jobs, and our environment. 

I urge you to keep these comrnents in mind in implementing 316B. I am always available for discussion about 

these concerns. Please contact me if I can provide additional information to you. 

Sincerely, 

Rocky Adkins 

Majority Floor Leader