alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                                   
|Price of Everett, MA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Nigeria (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2010079EN.01000501.xml

| 25.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 79/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 79/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 250/2010

of 24 March 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de Petit Épeautre de Haute Provence (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de Petit Épeautre de Haute Provence’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de Petit Épeautre de Haute Provence’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 March 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 185, 7.8.2009, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Farine de Petit Épeautre de Haute Provence (PGI)

---
#### In the Matter of John A. Bucci et al., Respondents, v Adirondack Park Agency, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 895]

— Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Kirk, J.), entered March 20, 2003, which granted the CPLR article 78 petition and ordered respondent to process petitioners’ after-the-fact permit application.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Same memorandum as in *Adirondack Park Agency v Bucci*(2 AD3d 1293 [2003]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
#### Donna Follano et al., Appellants, v Colin Realty Co. et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 631]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), entered August 30, 2002, as granted that branch of the motion *674of the defendants Colin Realty Co., Fred Colin, and Chase Manhattan Corporation which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and granted the separate motion of the defendant McGuire Service Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition which allegedly caused the injured plaintiff to fall *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837-838 [1986]; *Carricato v Jefferson Val. Mall Ltd. Partnership,*299 AD2d 444 [2002]; *Voss v D&C Parking,*299 AD2d 346 [2002]; *Soon Rae Kim v Caesar Chemists,*297 AD2d 797 [2002]). Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition thereto *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendants’ remaining contentions. Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.39

                COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE
                   OFFICERS (EFFECTIVE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 2006)

     On March 27, 2006, the Compensation Committee (the "Compensation
Committee") of the Board of Directors of First Aviation Services, Inc. (the
"Company") approved the annual base salaries (effective as of February 1, 2006)
of the executive officers of the Company. The following table sets forth the
annual base salary levels of the following named executive officers of the
Company (as of February 1, 2006) for the year ending January 31, 2007 and the
year ended January 31, 2006:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>
Name and Position                                       Base Salary

Michael C. Culver                                       January 31, 2007        $350,000
President and Chief Executive Officer                   January 31, 2006        $350,000

Paul J. Fanelli                                         January 31, 2007        $250,000
President and Chief Executive Officer, Aerospace        January 31, 2006        $250,000
Products International, Inc.

Robert G. Costantini                                    January 31, 2007        $220,000
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice                    January 31, 2006        $200,000
President-Finance, and Secretary

     Also on March 27, 2006, the Compensation Committee authorized the award of
cash bonuses to certain of the named executive officers of the Company in
respect of the year ended January 31, 2006. The following table sets forth cash
bonuses in respect of the years ended January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2005:

Name and Position                                       Bonus

Michael C. Culver                                       January 31, 2006        $250,000
President and Chief Executive Officer                   January 31, 2005        $75,000

Paul J. Fanelli                                         January 31, 2006        $130,000
President and Chief Executive Officer, Aerospace        January 31, 2005        $50,000
Products International, Inc.

Robert G. Costantini                                    January 31, 2006        $90,000
Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice                    January 31, 2005        $30,000
President-Finance, and Secretary
</TABLE>

     Mr. Costantini has entered into an employment agreement with the Company,
dated October 7, 2003, which was filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2004.

     Mr. Fanelli has entered into an employment agreement with API, dated
February 2, 2004, which was amended as of April 5, 2004. The employment
agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 2004, and the amendment to the employment
agreement was filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 31, 2004.
EXHIBIT
8.1





Name
of Entity




The
following is a list of all of this Company’s subsidiaries.  However,
only the following five subsidiaries are, as of the commencement of the current
fiscal year on April 1, 2009, active subsidiaries that conduct
operations:  Nissin Precision Metal Manufacturing Limited; Kayser
Limited (formerly known as Kienzle Time (H.K.) Limited);  Kayser
(Wuxi) Metal Precision Manufacturing Limited;  Golden Bright Plastic
Manufacturing Company Limited; and Hi-Lite Camera Company Limited





Antemat
      Limited
                        Kayser
      Limited (formerly known as Kienzle Time (H.K.) Limited)
                          (“Kayser”)Nissin
      Mechatronic Limited
                        Kienzle
      Uhrenfabriken G.m.b.h.
                          (“Kienzle
      Germany”)Cavour
      Industrial Limited
                        Nissin
      Precision Metal
                          Manufacturing
      Limited
                          (“Nissin”)Hi-Lite
      Camera Company
                          Limited
      (“Hi-Lite”)
                        Saiwan
      Industries LimitedKayser
      Technik Limited
                        Golden
      Bright Plastic Manufacturing Company LimitedKayser
      (Wuxi) Metal Precision Manufacturing Limited (“Kayser
    (Wuxi)”)





All of
the subsidiaries are wholly-owned by Highway Holdings Limited other than Kayser
(Wuxi).  As of the date of this Annual Report, Highway Holdings
Limited legally holds 100% of the stock of Kayser (Wuxi), although two
unaffiliated persons own 29% economic interest in that entity.  As a
result, Highway Holdings currently only owns a 71% economic interest in Kayser
(Wuxi). Highway Holdings is currently completing the acquisition of a 19%
financial interest in Kayser (Wuxi) from one of the minority
shareholders.  Upon the completion of the acquisition of the 19%
interest, the Company will own 90% of the economic interest of the
Wuxi subsidiary.  The other 10% of the economic interest of the
Wuxi subsidiary will continue to be owned by the remaining minority shareholder,
who is also the factory manager of the Wuxi facility.  All
subsidiaries, with the exception of Kienzle Germany (incorporated in Germany)
and Kayser (Wuxi) (incorporated in The People’s Republic of China), are
incorporated in Hong Kong.









Highway
Holdings Limited also owns an equity interest in Kienzle U.S.A. Ltd., organized
in the U.S.A. (50% interest), and Kayser Technik (Overseas) Inc. organized in
Panama. (50% interest).
No. 12-6350.

#### Jinwright et vir *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Trustees

MESABI TRUST

New York, New York

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying condensed balance sheet of MESABI TRUST as of April 30, 2008,and the related condensed statements of income and cash flows for thethree-month periods ended April 30, 2008 and 2007.  These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Trust’s Trustees.

 

We conducted our review inaccordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States).  A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical proceduresand making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accountingmatters.  It is substantially less inscope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which isthe expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as awhole.  Accordingly, we do not expresssuch an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we arenot aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanyinginterim financial statements, referred to above, for them to be in conformitywith accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards ofthe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the balancesheet of MESABI TRUST as of January 31,2008, and the related statements of income, unallocated reserve and trustcorpus, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and inour report dated April 8, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion onthose financial statements.  In ouropinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed balance sheetas of January 31, 2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, inrelation to the balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 

*/s/ Gordon, Hughes &Banks, LLP*

Greenwood Village, Colorado

June 4, 2008

 

----
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Pauline Lenk, Also Known as Pauline Teisch, Deceased. Estate of Pauline Lenk et al., Appellants; Shirley Morse, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 67]

—In a proceeding to judicially settle the account of Shirley Morse, executrix of the estate of Pauline Lenk, (1) the estate of Pauline Lenk appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated August 6, 1993, as directed the payment of legal fees in the amount of only $5,000 and directed the law firm of Felt-man, Karesh, Major & Farbman to return to the estate all legal fees that it had received in excess of $5,000, and (2) the law firm of Feltman, Karesh, Major & Farbman appeals from so much of an order of the same court dated October 5, 1993, as denied its motion to withdraw as counsel for the estate.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated August 6,1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 5, 1993, is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the law firm’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The estate is not aggrieved by the order dated August 6, 1993, reducing the legal fees payable to the law firm of Felt-man, Karesh, Major & Farbman (hereinafter the law firm) for services rendered to the estate of Pauline Lenk *(see,*CPLR 5511; *Matter of Sold,*215 AD2d 566; *Matter of Serafim,*140 AD2d 350).

In light of the executrix’s refusal to pay the law firm a reasonable fee for the services it rendered on her behalf, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny the law firm’s motion to withdraw as counsel for the estate *(see, Galvano v Galvano,*193 AD2d 779, 780). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
# L_2010248EN.01006701.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 248/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 248/67

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 401/2010 of 7 May 2010 amending and correcting Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 laying down certain detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 as regards protected designations of origin and geographical indications, traditional terms, labelling and presentation of certain wine sector products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 117 of 11 May 2010
  )

On page 32, in Annex I, in the text of the new Annex XII to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009, Part B, CZECH REPUBLIC:

for:

| ‘Burčák | Czech | PDO

  (1) | Partially fermented grape must, where the actual alcohol content is higher than one volume percentage and lower than three fifths of the total alcohol content.’ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Burčák

Czech

PDO

(1)

Partially fermented grape must, where the actual alcohol content is higher than one volume percentage and lower than three fifths of the total alcohol content.’

read:

| ‘Burčák | Czech | PDO

  (11) | Partially fermented grape must, where the actual alcohol content is higher than one volume percentage and lower than three fifths of the total alcohol content.’ | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Burčák

Czech

PDO

(11)

Partially fermented grape must, where the actual alcohol content is higher than one volume percentage and lower than three fifths of the total alcohol content.’

---
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 82,125 | 76,860 | 67,525
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 70,581 | 53,206 | 71,553 | 48,417 | 45,751 | 42,713 | 34,801 | 28,987 | 49,481 | 50,409
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 46,156 | 44,251 | 49,925 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Moser v. Estate of Renninger; Renninger, In re

11/10/2015

440 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 1107
UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES ANDEXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-Q 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORTUNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) 

OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

For the quarterly periodended: September 30, 2003 

Commission filenumber: 1-448 

MESTEK, INC. 

**Indicate by check mark whether theregistrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to suchfiling requirements for the past 90 days.**

[ x ] Yes [ ] No 

The number of shares of Common Stockoutstanding as of November 2, 2003 was 8,721,603. 

----
No. 12-6556.

#### Daniels *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: September 25, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Chris Sherry, EPA 

SUBJECT: September 18, 2014 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held by telephone between EPA and staff of the National Association of 

Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). The call focused on answering clarifying questions 

about the discussion in the proposal of different basic types of state plan pathways. 

ATTENDEES 

NARUC 

Holly Rachel Smith, Assistant General Counsel 

US EPA 

Chris Sherry OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division
2016-1616.

#### State v. Tannert.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103550, 2016-Ohio-7046.
2017-0216.

#### State v. Burnett.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00007, 2016-Ohio-7502. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.