alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of J. I. T. and J. A. T., children

Appellate case number: 01-17-00988-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-53185

Trial court: 311th District Court

To assist the Court in analyzing the issues raised in this appeal and to allow fuller 

use of the oral argument process, the parties are ORDERED to provide the following 

additional information to the Court no later than Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. To 

the extent a letter brief is fully responsive, that format is permissible. Otherwise, please 

provide copies of documents responsive to this request.

The Department of Family and Protective Services is ordered to inform the Court 

whether the Department has any written policies that are publicly available that discuss, 

address or mention any of the following issues: (1) whether family reunification as a 

permanency goal has primacy over other permanency options, (2) whether parents must 

be informed if the Department is taking the position that completion of services will be 

considered unsatisfactory if a parent fails to cooperate in the investigation, (3) whether 

the Department should inform a parent if the permanency goal changes from family 

reunification to a different goal, and (4) any stated position on the interplay between 

“honest” disclosure in termination proceedings and services completion and Fifth 

Amendment implications in any pending criminal matter. If any such written policies 

exist, the Department is ordered to provide them to the Court and notify the Court 

whether it objects to the Court taking judicial notice of such policies by Tuesday, May 

29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m.

P.M. is ordered to inform the Court by Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. 

whether there was a plea agreement in her criminal matter and to provide a copy of the 

agreement, if one exists. The parties are ordered to inform the Court at oral argument if 

they have any objection to this Court taking judicial notice of such agreement, if it exists.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown_______________________________________

  Acting for the Court

Date: May 25, 2018
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

November 13, 2014 

Mr. Scott Harris 

President 

Harris Aircraft Services, Inc. 

400 Airport Road 

Sitka, AK 99835 

Dear Mr. Harris: 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington DC 20590 

We have completed our review of the information submitted to us in the application filed on 

August 25, 2014 by Harris Aircraft Services, Inc. ("Harris Air") for the determination of its 

fitness for a certificate of public convenience and necessity. We have determined the need for 

additional and/or clarifying information before we can complete processing of Harris Air's 

application. 

Listed below are items where further and/or clarification information is necessary. 

1. In reference to Exhibit/Tab 7 ofthe application: 

a. In the Profit and Loss January through December 2012 statement, page 5, net income 

is shown as $142,798 on total revenue of $2,454,574 (page 2). However, on the 

"Income Statement" dated December 31, 2013, the January through December 2012 

column shows net income of $46,233. Please explain the discrepancy and submit a 

revised or corrected version of the Profit and Loss statement. 

b. On the December 31,2012, balance sheet, total current assets of$713,766 are shown. 

However, on the multi-year 2012/2013 balance sheet December 31, 2012 column 

(page 1 of 2), total current assets for 2012 are $351,396. Please explain the 

discrepancy and submit a revised or corrected version of the balance sheet. 

c. Please explain the negative APB checking balance shown on the multi-year 

2012/2013 balance sheet as of December 31, 2013. Additionally, please explain the 

negative $42,142 for APB checking on the multi-year 2013/2014 balance sheet as of 

May 31,2014. 

d. Please explain the "Lawsuit Proceeds of $11 0,000" under "other current assets" on 

the May 31, 2014 balance sheet. 
2 

2. Please submit a September 30, 2014, balance sheet and income statement ending that 

same date. 

Please respond fully to this request within 30 days of the date of this letter. Your response 

should be filed in Docket DOT-OST-2014-0145. 

As is the Department's practice, further processing of Harris Air's application will be deferred 

pending receipt ofthis material. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any 

questions regarding this letter or the requested information, please feel free to contact Barbara 

Snoden of my staff at (202) 366-9721. 

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Enclosure 

cc: Docket-DOT-OST-2014-0145 

Mr. Troy McClanahan 

POI for Harris Aircraft Serv}ces, Inc. 

FAA, Juneau FSDO
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9      | 10     | 11    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 12     | 13     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 13    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 13     | 12     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
2017-0522.

#### State ex rel. Shelter v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-119, 2017-Ohio-1063. On appellant’s application for dismissal. Application granted. Cause dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2043 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 584
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2043

                          [Report No. 103-342]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 25 (legislative day, April 11), 1994

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

              Reported by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the 
Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation 
and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER, hull 
identification number 3121125, and State of Hawaii registration number 
HA1809E.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 584

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2043

                          [Report No. 103-342]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel BAGGER.

_______________________________________________________________________

              August 19 (legislative day, August 18), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
```
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | 14.04  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 23.1


Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
International Sports Wagering Inc.:



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-41847) of International Sports Wagering Inc. of our
report dated November 25, 1998, relating to the balance sheets of
International Sports Wagering Inc. (a development stage company) as of
September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended September 30, 1998
and 1997, and for the period from May 22, 1995 (date of inception) to
September 30, 1998, which report appears in the 1998 annual report on Form
10-KSB of International Sports Wagering Inc.


                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                        s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


                                            



New York, New York
December 28, 1998
NO. 07-02-0115 -CV IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A APRIL 2, 2002

______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF ZACKERY HUS EMAN AND MADELINE HUSEMAN, MINOR CHILDREN

_________________________________ FROM THE 64 TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY; NO. A29348-9708; H ONORAB LE JACK R. MILLE R, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Appellant Timothy H usem an gave notice of appeal on March 4, 2 002, from an order of the t rial court

entered on February 15, 2002, dism issing his pet ition to m odif y in a su it affecting the parent-child relationship. W e have now received a certified copyof a m ore recenttrial court order dated March 22, 200 2, in which it g ranted appellant’s m otion to reconsider

the February 15 order of dism issal, withdrew t hat order, and indicated its intent to pro cee d in t he m atter a fte r th e re spo nde nt h as b een ser ved . Th e tr ial c ourt also “abated” the appeal and declared it m oot.2

The filing of a notice of appeal inv oke s th e ap pella te cour t’s j uris dict ion o ver

all parties to the judgment or order appeale d from. Tex. R. App. P. 2 5.1(b). However, the trial court retains plenary power togrant a new trial or to vacate, m odify, correct, or reformthe judgm ent until 30 days after al l such moti on s ar e o ve rr ul ed . T ex. R. Civ. P. 329 b(e) and (g). The trial court has now recons idered the order appealed from and vac at ed it , a nd we thus agree that the pending appeal has been rendered m oot. Further, there is no appealable or

der befo re this court, and we m ust therefore dism iss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Since appellant obtained the relief he requested bythetria l c ourt’s a ction, the need for ten daysnotice to the parties prior to dism issal pursuantto Rule 42.3 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure is obviated, and w e suspend thatrequirement for p urposes of this appeal only pursuant to the authority of Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dism issed.
John T. Boyd Chief Justi ce Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request Entitled Preparation, 
Submission, and Negotiation of Subcontracting Plans

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to 
an existing OMB clearance (3090-0252).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The GSA hereby gives notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), that it is requesting the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) to reinstate information collection, 3090-
0252, Preparation, Submission, and Negotiation of Subcontracting Plans. 
This information collection will ensure that small and small 
disadvantaged business concerns are afforded the maximum practical 
opportunity to participate as subcontractors in construction, repair, 
and alteration or less contracts. A request for public comments was 
published at 62 FR 55406 on October 24, 1997. No comments were 
received.

DATES: February 20, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, Room 
3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 18th & F Streets, NW, Washington, DC 
20405.

Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 1350;
    Annual responses: 1;
    Average hours per response: 12;
    Burden hours: 16,200.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Al Matera, Office of GSA Acquisition Policy (202) 501-1224.

Copy of Proposal

    A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the GSA Acquisition 
Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 18th & F Streets, NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or by faxing 
your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: January 12, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-1402 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
2017-0139.

#### State v. Fant.

Mahoning App. No. 14 MA 0067, 2016-Ohio-7429. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

French, O’Neill, and Fischer, JJ., dissent.
STEVE DAINES

MONTANA 206 CANNON HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202)225-3211 

# Cottgregg of the Elniteb *tateg ^)ouze of Aepregentatibee; Ma g lytttgton, MC 20515-2600

February 27, 2014
"I'he Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave Northwest Washington, D.0 .20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy: I am writing to request a meeting regarding the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed rule to establish more stringent air emissions requirements for new residential wood heaters. Thousands of Montanans use wood stoves to provide cost-effective heat, and there are questions and concerns about whether the proposed regulation will affect access to new residential wood heaters, or ultimately force consumers to pay higher prices. I understand the proposed regulations would impose significant new requirements on new residential wood-burning stoves and other wood burning appliances used in the United States. While the rule would not impact existing wood stoves, I believe it is crucial that the EPA consider the feasibility of implementing the proposed rule and whether the agency's policies would reduce access to affordable, reliable wood stoves in the future. As Montana's voice in the House of Representatives, I would like to meet with your staff regarding the proposed EPA regulation. My scheduler, Jesika Whittle, will be promptly in touch with your staff to ensure that the meeting occurs in the near future. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

STEV AINb,^) ember of Congress (MT-At Large)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
#### Com. v. Simmers

08/11/2016

309 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 145 A.3d 775
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raymond Alexander, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 592]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered August 13, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and promoting prison contraband in the *522first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2V2 to 5 years, unanimously dismissed as moot.

Defendant seeks a reduction of his sentence, claiming that it was excessive and based on an incomplete presentence report. Since he has completed his entire sentence, including parole supervision, this appeal is moot.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Kahn, JJ.
Exhibit 31.6


CERTIFICATION








I, Rodney E. Schwatken, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this amendment on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of Novation Companies, Inc., as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2015;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date:May 27, 2015/s/ Rodney E. SchwatkenRodney E. SchwatkenChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit (10)(c)(10)**

 

AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT (this"Amendment"), effective as of July 24, 2003, by and between ALLTELCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), and Scott T.Ford ("Executive"), amends that certain Agreement, dated as of April25, 1996, by and between the Corporation and Executive, (the"Agreement").

In consideration of the mutualcovenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuableconsideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, theparties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1.     Section1(C) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting subsection (iv) in itsentirety and changing subsection (iii) to read as follows:

> 
(iii)     The    consummation of (A) a merger or consolidation of the Corporation, statutory    share exchange, or other similar transaction with another corporation,    partnership, or other entity or enterprise in which either the Corporation    is not the surviving or continuing corporation or shares of common stock of    the Corporation are to be converted into or exchanged for cash, securities    other than common stock of the Corporation, or other property, (B) a sale or    disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Corporation, or    (C) the dissolution of the Corporation.

2.     As amendedhereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date

first above written.

> **ALLTEL CORPORATION**
By:              /s/ Francis X. Frantz      
Francis            X. Frantz, Executive Vice President and Secretary

 
**EXECUTIVE:

/s/              Scott T.              Ford                                 

Scott T.            Ford

 

 

 **