alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Michael Evan W., Respondent, v Pamela Lyn B., Appellant.

[58 NYS3d 45]—

Order, Family Court, New York County (Monica Shulman, Ref.), entered on or about December 3, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a hearing, issued an order of protection against the mother in favor of the child, and denied the mother supervised visitation with the child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

“The determination as to whether or not a court should award visitation to a noncustodial parent lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, and must be based upon the best interests of the child” (see *Matter of Ronald C. v Sherry B.,*144 AD3d 545, 546 [1st Dept 2016], *lv dismissed*29 NY3d 965 [2017]). “Generally, a child’s best interest lies in being nurtured by both parents and a noncustodial parent should have reasonable rights of visitation unless there is substantial evidence that visitation would be detrimental to the welfare of the child” *(id.*[citation omitted]). “Thus, there is a rebuttable presumption that visitation by a noncustodial parent is in the child’s best interest and should be denied only in exceptional circumstances” *(id.).*

*415Here, the Family Court’s determination that visitation would be detrimental to the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Matter of Marrero v Johnson,*89 AD3d 596, 597 [1st Dept 2011]). The father presented substantial evidence at the hearing that the mother masterminded a plot to murder him in order to gain control of the proceeds of the father’s $1,500,000 life insurance policy, for which she was named the irrevocable trustee. Surveillance photos revealed the mother and her cousin buying a sledgehammer at Home Depot the day before the cousin attacked the husband with the same sledgehammer. The father also presented phone records showing that the mother and her cousin were in communication on the day of the attack, and a hand-drawn map found with the cousin at his arrest, which depicted points of entry and egress in the father’s building, was determined to be written in the mother’s handwriting. In addition, the knife recovered from the scene came from the mother’s apartment.

Beyond the evidence related to the attack on the father, testimony demonstrated that the mother sought to alienate the child from the father, falsely claiming that the father was trying to put her in jail, and pressing the child for personal details about the father’s life, which also supported the denial of visitation (see *Susan G.B. v Yehiel B.H.,*216 AD2d 58, 58-59 [1st Dept 1995]). Moreover, the mother invoked her Fifth Amendment right not to testify, and did not call any other witnesses, depriving the Family Court of any basis to grant her visitation. Thus, in view of the record, we find no reason to disturb the Family Court’s determination (see *Marrero,*89 AD3d at 597).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli and Gische, JJ.
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N -^ ' ^ • FEDERAL AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N 

### 'ORlAiiO H

I n th e Matte r

of : TREVO RMILLER , * FA A Docke t CP09SW000 4 * * FDM S FAA-2009-073 5 * Hon . RichardC . Goodwi n (ALJ ) WITHDRAWA L O F COMPLAIN T Th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) , i n accordanc e with Sectio n 13.21 5 o f th e Rule s o f Practic e in FA A Civi l Penalty Actions , hereb y withdraw s it s complaint . Thi s complain t i s withdraw n becaus e on e o f Complainant' s mai n witaesse s i s unavailabl e t o testify . Date dthi s 23r dday o f

June , 2010 . Respectfull y submitted ,

LYNETT E WOR D Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Regio n By : Yoland aAyal aBema l Agenc y Attorne y (817)222-507 0



### JU N 2 h 201 0 HEARIN G DOCKE TCERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s date th e original an dacop y o f th e Withdrawal o f

Complain t

wa s maile db y Federa l Expres s Mai l to : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building-Suit e 2W100 0 Washington , D C 2059 1 Atm : Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 I hereb y certif

y that acop y o f Withdrawal o f

Complaint

wa s sen t vi afa x an dmaile dthi s dat e b y Federa l Expres s Mai l to : Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Eas t Builidin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-E32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 I hereb y certif

y that acop y o f Withdrawal o f

Complaint

wa s maile dthi s dat e b y Federa l Expres s Mai l to : Mr . Trevo r

Mille r 231 9 Sundanc e Driv e 0'Fallon,M O 6336 8

Gay Whittington , Manageirient an dProgra

mAnalys t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n For t Worth , Texa s 7613 7 Dated : Jun e 23,201 0
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

p0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148801

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148801

COA: 319191

Wayne CC: 12-004295-FC

ROVELLE LAMONT HENDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 12-7563.

No. 12-7685.

No. 12-7741.

No. 12-7789.

No. 12-8083.

#### In re Wise; In re Baca; In re Williams; In re Cobble; and In re Ruhbayan.

Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
### SERVED: April 25, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF**TRANSPORTATION'':~,** 

### J. ;·

In The Matter Of: Webgistix Corporation Respondent 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS ·-·

### c:.f'~_};r.**::/': ,**  WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2015-0208 Case No. 20138070031

DISMISSAL ORDER On April 20, 2016, the Complainant filed a Notice ofWithdrawal ofComplaint, stating that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that these proceedings are dismissed withprejudice.

Attachment: Service List

# ~RAWALD­ Administrative Law JudgeDocket No. FAA-2015-0208 (Civil Penalty Action)

SERVICE LIST

- BY U.S. MAIL

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl000 1

Webgistix Corporation, 

### Respondent Attn: President 127 East Warm Springs Rd. Las Vegas, NV 89119 Webgistix Corporation, 

### Respondent Attn: President 880 Wigwam Parkway, Suite 120 Henderson,NV 89014 ONE COPY

Patrick G. Byrne, 

### Respondent's Counsel Snell & Wilmer, LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5958 TEL: 702-784-5201 FAX: 702-784-5252 Andrea Michelle Harper, 

### Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Chief Counsel Enforcement Division, Southern Team Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

l Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.76   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | 10.01  | 5.87   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# EPA Registration Jacket 81142-4

Vol.3______________________________________________________________

Page is not included in this copy.

Pages 34 through 49 are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 51 is not included in this copy.

Pages through _ are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131295 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131295 

 COA: 259326 

Bay CC: 03-010747

RONALD DALE McBRIDE, JR., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1018 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 25, 2006 

 Clerk
No. 12-7934.

#### McBroom *v.*Safford et al.

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      February 12, 2010 |                                                    |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                    |
|                         | /s/      Michael S. Steiner                        |   |
|                         | Michael      S. SteinerPrincipal      Executive Officer |

----
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Cove Point, MD  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Cove Point, MD  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 17,079
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 33,357 | 22,019 | 23,726 | 12,273 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Michael S.
Steiner,  Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005

                                           /s/ Michael S. Steiner
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael S. Steiner
                                           Principal Executive Officer




                                       20
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

$/2jg) II-K- (ft m 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:58 AM Sheet 273 of 325 
P.2 

/A\ P) 

H-K-(A)-5 

V/ 

PROPOSED ENERGY SCENARIO 

EEA, Inc. 

June 8, 1982 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(A)-5 

— j L
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 3149

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM014AD

AOT A35L007

- 14 , R00

--- 12/18/14

B/E AEROSPACE SIL D1019

- 01, R1

--- 1/3/2000

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1880 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        S.1880

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                                 An Act

  
 
  To provide that the National Education Commission on Time and Learning 
shall


                    terminate on September 30, 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF THE NATIONAL EDUCATION COMMISSION ON TIME AND 
LEARNING.
    Subsection (g) of section 102 of the National Education Commission 
on Time and Learning Act (20 U.S.C. 1221-1 note) is amended by striking 
``90 days after submitting the final report required by subsection 
(d)'' and inserting ``on September 30, 1994''.







                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.`