alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.87   | 4.81  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.32   | 7.15   | 10.93  | 6.96   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A155
#### In the Matter of Qualiayah J. and Another., Children Alleged to be Neglected. Taneka J., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 95]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 9, 2015, which, after a hearing, found that respondent mother neglected the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from dispositional order, same Court and Justice, entered on or about March 4, 2016, which placed the children in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services until the next scheduled permanency hearing, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The mother’s regular, long-term drug use while the children were in her care constituted prima facie evidence of neglect, *496and she failed to rebut the statutory presumption by showing that she was participating in treatment (Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [iii]). In fact, the evidence affirmatively showed that the mother had refused all of the agency’s referrals and maintained that she was not addicted to marijuana. The Family Court properly determined that the mother had neglected the children on account of her drug use *(Matter of Nadia S. [Ron S.],*138 AD3d 526, 527 [1st Dept 2016] [child neglected due to father’s “admitted use of marijuana almost every day and his refusal to seek treatment”]). The deplorable and unsanitary condition of the mother’s apartment lends further support to the Family Court’s neglect finding *(Matter of Ze’Nya G. [Nina W.],*126 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2015]).

The mother’s appeal from the dispositional order is dismissed as academic. The order was superseded by a permanency hearing order, from which no appeal was taken *(Matter of Skye C. [Monica S.],*127 AD3d 603, 604 [1st Dept 2015]). In any event, the mother’s objection to the visitation terms of the disposi-tional order are without merit, as the order does not grant the children an unconditional “veto” power over her visitation, but simply directed the agency to schedule visits if and when either the children or the mother requested them.

We have considered the mother’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Richter, Maz-zarelli and Gische, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      8.1





Name
      of Entity




Antemat
                Limited
            Kienzle
                Bulgaria Limited
              (“Kienzle
                Bulgaria”)Nissin
                Mechatronic Ltd. (formerly, Badex Investments Limited)
            Kienzle
                Time (H.K.) Limited
              (“Kienzle
                HK”)Cavour
                Industrial Limited
            Kienzle
                Uhrenfabriken G.m.b.h.
              (“Kienzle
                Germany”)Hi-Lite
                Camera Company
              Limited
                (“Hi-Lite”)
            Nissin
                Precision Metal
              Manufacturing
                Limited
              (“Nissin”)Kayser
                Technik Limited
              (formerly
                known as
              “Kayser
                Print Limited”)
            Saiwan
                Industries LimitedKienzle
                Balkan Limited





All
      of
      the subsidiaries are wholly-owned, other than Kienzle Balkan, which is 51%
      owned
      by Highway Holdings Limited. All subsidiaries, with the exception of Kienzle
      Germany (incorporated in Germany), Kienzle Bulgaria (incorporated in the
      Republic of Bulgaria), and Kienzle Balkan Limited (incorporated in the Republic
      of Bulgaria), are incorporated in Hong Kong.





Highway
      Holdings Limited also owns an equity interest in the following entities:


--Kayser
      Photo (Overseas) Corp., incorporated in the Republic of Panama; 50%
      interest.


--Kienzle
      USA Ltd., organized in the U.S.A.; 50% interest.


--Kiezle
      AG, organized in Germany; 20% interest.
Memorandum

Subject: Telephone conversations between Nathan Topham and Counsel for 

Association of Battery Recyclers

Dates: May 16, 2013; July 24, 2013; September 26, 2013

Telephone conversations took place on May 16, July 24, and September 26 of 2013 between 

Nathan Topham of USEPA and Mark DeLaquil. Mr. DeLaquil serves as counsel for the 

Association of Battery Recyclers (ABR) and East Penn. 

On the dates listed above, Mr. DeLaquil and Mr. Topham spoke of the status and expected 

timeline of the anticipated direct final rule in response to ABR’s petition for reconsideration. 

Additionally, Mr. Topham and Mr. DeLaquil discussed the status and expected timeline of 

EPA’s response to a request for an alternative standard submitted by East Penn.
Exhibit 10.1 


 


 


HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the trustees of Hospitality Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.  


 



	
             
 	
            •
 	
            Each independent trustee receives an annual fee of $25,000, plus a fee of $500 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $500 fees are payable if a board meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date. 
 




 



	
             
 	
            •
 	
            The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent trustee, are entitled to receive an additional annual fee of $7,500, $3,500 and $3,500, respectively. 
 




 



	
             
 	
            •
 	
            Each trustee is entitled to receive a
grant of 750 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of
the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended). 
 




 



	
             
 	
            •
 	
            The Company generally reimburses all trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as trustees.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13695]



[[Page 28452]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-19; OTS Nos. H-2311 and 03606]


Homestead Mutual Holding Company, Ponchatoula, LA; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on May 14, 1998, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Homestead Mutual Holding Company, Ponchatoula, Louisiana, to convert to 
the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available 
for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20552, and the Midwest 
Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John Carpenter 
Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75039-2010.

    Dated: May 18, 1998.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13695 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31259

In Re: In the Matter of the complaint: T.L. JAMES & COMPANY INC.,

as owner of the Crane Barge ALROAR, praying for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability; T.L. JAMES & COMPANY INC., as owner of the Crane Barge BILL JOHNSON, praying for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability

Petitioners

TEXACO TRADING AND TRANSPORTATION, INC.; TEXACO PIPELINE INCORPORATED; TEXAC O INC.; EQUILON PIPELINE CO., LLC; EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC
Plaintiffs - Appellants

VERSUS

LAINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.; ET AL

Defendants

T.L. JAMES & COMPANY INC.
Defendant - Appellee

T.L. JAMES & COMPANY INC., as owner of the Crane Barge ALROAR
Petitioner - Appellee

VERSUS

LAINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.; ET AL

Claimants

TEXACO PIPELINE INC.; TEXACO INC.
Claimants - AppellantsNo. 00-31259 -2-

EQUILON PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, successor-in-interest to Texaco Pipeline, Inc.; EQUILON ENTERPRISES, LLC, successor-in-interest to Texaco Trading and Transportation Inc. and Texaco Inc.

Movants - Appellants

T.L. JAMES & COMPANY INC., as owner of the Crane Barge BILL JOHNSON

Petit ioner - Appellee

VERSUS

LAINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.; ET AL

Claimants

TEXACO PIPELINE INC; TEXACO INC.; EQUILON PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, as successor-in-interest to Texaco Pipeline Inc. and Texaco Inc.

Claimants

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans
(EP-00-CV-279-H) April 3, 2002

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court b e polled on Rehearing En Banc, (F E D

. R.

A PP

. P. and 5 TH C IR

. R. 35) the Petition for Reh earing En Banc isNo. 00-31259 -3-

also DENIED. Judge Emilio M. Garza would grant panel rehearing for the

reasons e xpressed in his dissent to the panel opinion. He would

also grant rehearing to remove any s uggestion from the panel opinion that T.L. James may be held to indemnify parties irrespective of their own negligence.
No. 12-7549.

#### Arias *v.*Grounds, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Juan Manuel Alday

, * From the 29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County

Trial Court No. 16180

.

Vs. No. 11

- 17

- 00306

- CR * March 8 , 2018

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appeal is dismissed.
No. 12-7913.

#### In re James.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
#### Com. v. Bocelli

08/23/2016

273 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 599
#### Com. v. Millard 23

12/29/2015

301 WAL (2015)

23

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 26 A.3d 1199
No. 12-8692.

#### Washington *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                    
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Price of Fort Lauderdale, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   | W   | W  
|2022                                                                                                                              | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   | W  
|2023                                                                                                                              | W   | W   | W   | W   | W   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7746.

#### Cervantes *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-861.

#### Continental Motors, Inc. *v.*United States District Court for the Central District of California et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. JOHNSON, A.

2083 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/18/2017

CP-67-CR-0007270-2011

(York)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 5, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-0410 Lower Tribunal No. 19-5346

________________ 

### Susan Braun , Appellant,
vs. 

### Tracey Sager, et al. , Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Yvonne Colodny, Judge. Susan Braun, in proper person. Gutter Chaves Josepher Rubin Forman Fleisher Miller P.A., and Sean M. Lebowitz (Boca Raton), for appellees. Before EMAS, SCALES and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. Bertrand v. Belhomme, 892 So. 2d 1150, 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The evidence to support a finding of fraud must be clear and convincing.”); Est. of Herrera v. Berlo Indus., Inc., 840 So. 2d 272, 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“[I]ssues not presented in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Visoly v. Sec. Pac. Credit Corp., 768 So. 2d 482,491–92 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“[A]n appeal which lacks a factual basis or wellgrounded legal argument will be considered devoid of merit.”).
No. 12-7814.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
No. 12-8580.

#### Sherman *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-1221.

#### State ex rel. Neil v. French.

Franklin App. No. 17AP-241. On appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction. This cause originated in the court of appeals and therefore should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 5.01.

The clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.07.
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Sault St Marie, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Sault St Marie, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 4.42   | 2.91  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8732.

#### Washington *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

Certification of
Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC §1350,  
as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Israel
(Eli) Ofer, certify, pursuant to 18 USC §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the           Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 11, 2006 |  | /s/ Israel (Eli) Ofer
Israel (Eli) OferChief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1703

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. ROBB) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Piscataway National

5 Park Expansion Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF LAND.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec8 retary of the Interior is authorized to acquire land or in9 terests in land generally depicted on the drawing entitled
2

•S 1703 IS

1 ‘‘Proposed Boundary Map—Piscataway Park’’, numbered

2 838–80137, and dated November 17, 1993.

3 (b) MEANS OF ACQUISITION.—The Secretary may ac4 quire the land or interests in land described in subsection

5 (a) by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise.

6 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as

8 are necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ