alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
to 9675

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. Kysor Industrial Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 1:97-
CV-526, was lodged on May 13, 1998, with the United States District 
Court for the Western District of Michigan. The proposed consent decree 
resolves the United States' claims against defendants Kysor Industrial 
Corporation, Transpro Group, Inc. and Raymond Weigel for past costs 
incurred in connection with the Kysor Industrial Superfund Site and the 
contiguous Northernaire Superfund Site located in Cadillac, Wexford 
County, Michigan, in return for a total payment of $1,050,00.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Kysor Industrial Corporation, et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-
2-837B.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 330 Ionia NW, Room 501, Grand Rapids, Michigan 
49503; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 77 
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; and at the Consent 
Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 
(202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained 
in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please 
refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $7.50 
(25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree 
Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-14334 Filed 5-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
|                                                                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                              
|                                                                                                           
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                           
|                                                                                                           
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Dominican Republic (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 8.28   | --     | 4.42   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Nora Arthur, Appellant, v Carver Federal Savings Bank et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[55 NYS3d 5]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about August 16, 2016, which, to the *448extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants Carver Federal Savings Bank, Waterfall Victoria Master Fund Ltd., Waterfall Victoria REO 2013-01 LLC and Statebridge Company LLC to dismiss the complaint as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, the motion denied as to plaintiff’s 12th, 13th and 15th causes of action, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court improperly dismissed plaintiff’s 12th cause of action because defendants’ proof was insufficient to establish that they sent a notice to plaintiff 90 days prior to the sale of her cooperative shares held as collateral *(see*UCC 9-611 [f] [1]).

The court improperly dismissed plaintiff’s 13th cause of action because the notice of sale misidentified the secured party, and failed to state that “the debtor is entitled to an accounting of the unpaid indebtedness and . . . the charge, if any, for an accounting,” as required by UCC 9-613.

The court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s 15th cause of action on the ground that General Business Law § 349 only applies to the “soliciting, processing, placing or negotiating of mortgagees).” There is nothing in the section that so limits it. The court also erred in dismissing that claim on the ground that plaintiff failed to come to court with a payment plan. Rather, plaintiff stated a claim under that statute in that she adequately alleged that defendant was engaged in a consumer oriented transaction, that was misleading and injured her, as required by *Oswego Laborers’ Local 214 Pension Fund v Marine Midland Bank*(85 NY2d 20, 25 [1995]).

The court properly dismissed the remaining causes of action. Plaintiff also failed to state a claim that the nonjudicial foreclosure sale was not conducted in a commercially reasonable manner *(see*UCC 9-610).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments, including that she should be permitted to replead her inadequate causes of action, and find them unavailing.

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli, Gische and Gesmer, JJ.
2016-1590.

#### State v. Speed.

Cuyahoga App. No. 103953. Motion to dismiss denied as moot.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

French, J., dissents and would grant the motion to dismiss.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1367]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Industry Working Group Meeting on Operations Specifications

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of an 
industry working group meeting to discuss Operations Specifications.

DATES: The meeting will be held on January 27 at 1:00 p.m. until 5:00 
p.m. and January 28, from 8:00 a.m. until noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Air Transport Association of 
America, Suite 1100, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Connie Streeter, Federal Aviation Administration, Air Transportation 
Division, (AFS-260), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591, e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9f9392929599d28f888e999988998ebc9a9d9dd2989388d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16757978787f73386562647373627364567077773872796238717960">[email protected]</span></a>, or Mike Dugan, Air 
Transport Association of America, (202) 626-4000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to sections 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of an industry working group to discuss 
operations specifications. This meeting will be held January 27, 1:00 
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and January 28, 8:00 a.m. until noon at the Airline 
Transportation Association, Suite 1100, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but may be limited to 
the space available.

    Issued in Washington, DC on January 14, 1998.
Quentin J. Smith,
Manager, Air Transportation Division, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 98-1367 Filed 1-15-98; 1:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Saverio J. Cusenza, Appellant. John E. Sweeney, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[630 NYS2d 418]

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 30, 1994, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Testimony established that claimant was a substantial owner of an incorporated florist business which was active during the time he was receiving unemployment insurance benefits. This evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits and that he willfully made false statements to obtain them, making him liable for a recoverable overpayment of benefits.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ. concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1667

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1993

by six months.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. PELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read

the third time, and passed

A BILL

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace

Facilitation Act of 1993 by six months.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

4 Section 3(a) of the Middle East Peace Facilitation

5 Act of 1993 (Public Law 103–125) is amended by striking

6 ‘‘January 1’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘July 1’’.

Æ
No. 12-7968.

#### Pittmon *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7265.

#### Sanchez-Montes *v.*Benov, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.20 FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT [TWO-YEAR] This First Amendment (the Amendment) made as of June 4, 2002, to that
certain Change in Control Agreement (Agreement) between Southwest
Bancorporation of Texas, Inc. (the Company) and (Executive) ; WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as
provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Section 5(a)(i) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: (i) In lieu of any further payments to the Executive for
periods subsequent to the Termination Date, but without affecting the
rights of the Executive referred to in Section 5(b) hereof, a lump sum
payment (the Severance Payment) in an amount equal to the present
value (using a discount rate required to be utilized for purposes of
computations under Section 280G of the Code or any successor provision
thereto, or if no such rate is so required to be used, a rate equal to
the then-applicable interest rate prescribed by the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation for benefit valuations in connection with
non-multiemployer pension plan terminations assuming the immediate
commencement of benefit payments (the Discount Rate)) of the sum of
(A) the aggregate Base Pay (at the highest rate in effect during the
Term prior to the Termination Date) for two years, plus (B) the
aggregate Incentive Pay for two years (based upon the greatest amount
of Incentive Pay paid or payable to the Executive for any year during
the three calendar years preceding the year in which the Termination
Date occurs); provided, however, that the Severance Payment shall be
reduced so that the aggregate present value (as determined under
Section 280G of the Code or any successor provision thereto) of the
amount otherwise payable hereunder, when added to the present value
(as determined under Section 280G of the Code or any successor
provision thereto) of any other parachute payments (as that term is
defined in Section 280G of the Code (without regard to Section
280G(b)(2)(A)(ii) thereof) or any successor provision thereto) from the
Company, shall not exceed an amount (the 299% Amount) equal to 299%
of the Executives base amount (as that term is defined in Section
280G of the Code or any successor provision thereto) so that no portion
of such amounts received by the Executive shall be subject to the
excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code if and only if such
reduction produces a better net after-tax position for the Executive
(taking into account any applicable excise tax under Section 4999 of
the Code and any other applicable taxes) than the full payment of the
Severance Payments and all other payments and benefits provided for in
this Agreement or otherwise would have produced.




---



##### 



1. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue without
interruption or change. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have caused this
Amendment to be duly executed, effective for all purposes all as of the day and
year first above written. SOUTHWEST BANCORPORATION OF TEXAS, INC.By: EXECUTIVE 2
#### Ennigier Rivera, Respondent, v MD. LR. Bhuiyan et al., Appellants.

[52 NYS3d 315]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered March 25, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint’s negligent hiring, retention and supervision claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained after a collision between a motor vehicle *494operated by defendant Rivera and a motorcycle operated by plaintiff. The amended complaint and the bill of particulars when considered together state a claim for negligent hiring, retention and supervision, because it is alleged that defendants MD. LR. Bhuiyan (Bhuiyan) and/or Park West Executive Services, Inc. (Park West) knew or should have known that defendant Rivera was not competent to safely operate a motor vehicle if they had conducted an investigation into her driving history *(see Sheila C. v Povich,*11 AD3d 120, 129-130 [1st Dept 2004]). Although Bhuiyan and Park West initially denied in the answer that defendant Rivera was operating the vehicle within the scope of her employment when the accident happened, in their reply affirmation, they concede the issue. However, inasmuch as plaintiff claims that Bhuiyan and Park West negligently and recklessly hired, retained and supervised defendant Rivera, this claim may be treated, in effect, as a demand for punitive damages *(see Quiroz v Zottola,*96 AD3d 1035, 1037 [2d Dept 2012]), bringing the claim within the exception to the rule that generally, a claim for negligent hiring may not stand when liability is premised upon respondeat superior *(id.).*

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels and Webber, JJ.
No. 12-8786.

#### Scarnati *v.*Federal Bureau of Investigation et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1867

To expedite the naturalization of aliens who served with special guerrilla

units in Laos.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 24 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. DURENBERGER (for himself, Mr. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To expedite the naturalization of aliens who served with

special guerrilla units in Laos.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hmong Veterans’ Nat5 uralization Act of 1994’’.
2

S 1867 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT

2 FOR CERTAIN ALIENS WHO SERVED WITH

3 SPECIAL GUERRILLA UNITS IN LAOS.

4 The requirement of paragraph (1) of section 312 of

5 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1423)

6 shall not apply to the naturalization of any person who—

7 (1) served with a special guerrilla unit operat8 ing from a base in Laos in support of the United

9 States at any time during the period beginning Feb10 ruary 28, 1961, and ending September 18, 1978, or

11 (2) is the spouse or widow of a person described

12 in paragraph (1).

13 SEC. 3. NATURALIZATION THROUGH SERVICE IN A SPECIAL

14 GUERRILLA UNIT IN LAOS.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of subsection

16 (a) and subsection (b) (other than paragraph (3)) of sec17 tion 329 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

18 1440) shall apply to an alien who served with a special

19 guerrilla unit operating from a base in Laos in support

20 of the United States at any time during the period begin21 ning February 28, 1961, and ending September 18, 1978,

22 in the same manner as they apply to an alien who has

23 served honorably in an active-duty status in the military

24 forces of the United States during the period of the Viet25 nam hostilities.
3

S 1867 IS

1 (b) PROOF.—The Immigration and Naturalization

2 Service shall verify an alien’s service with a guerrilla unit

3 described in subsection (a) through—

4 (1) review of refugee processing documentation

5 for the alien,

6 (2) the affidavit of the alien’s superior officer,

7 (3) original documents,

8 (4) two affidavits from persons who were also

9 serving with such a special guerrilla unit and who

10 personally knew of the alien’s service, or

11 (5) other appropriate proof.

12 The Service shall liberally construe the provisions of this

13 subsection to take into account the difficulties inherent in

14 proving service in such a guerrilla unit.

Æ
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

2007-1326 

COMMITTEE FOR FAIR BEAM IMPORTS, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

John R. Shane, Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief were Alan H. Price and Christopher B. Weld. 

Donald B. Cameron, Troutman Sanders, LLP, of Washington, DC argued for the 

defendant-appellee Hyundai Steel Company. With him on the brief were Julie C. 

Mendoza, Brady W. Mills, and R. Will Planert. Of counsel was Jeffery S. Grimson. 

Marc A. Bernstein, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States 

International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee 

United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Neal 

J. Reynolds, Assistant General Counsel. 

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade 

Senior Judge Nicholas Tsoucalas 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2007-1326 

COMMITTEE FOR FAIR BEAM IMPORTS, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

 and 

 HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade 

in CASE NO(S). 06-00125 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, BRYSON, Circuit Judge, and KENNELLY∗ 

 District Judge). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED: _January 11, 2007____ / s /__Jan Horbaly___________

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk 

 

∗ Honorable Matthew Kennelly District Judge, United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 113 (Friday, June 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 33519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9021-4]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 06/01/2015 Through 06/05/2015
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20150160, Draft, USFWS, HI, Na Pua Makani Wind Project and 
Habitat Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 08/11/2015, Contact: 
Jodi Charrier 808-792-9400.
EIS No. 20150161, Draft, DOE, VT, New England Clean Power Link 
Transmission Line Project, Comment Period Ends: 08/11/2015, Contact: 
Brian Mills 202-586-8267.
EIS No. 20150162, Draft Supplement, FTA, CA, Regional Connector Transit 
Corridor, Comment Period Ends: 07/27/2015, Contact: Mary Nguyen 213-
202-3960.
EIS No. 20150163, Final, BLM, CA, Soda Mountain Solar Project Proposed 
Plan Amendment, Review Period Ends: 07/13/2015, Contact: Jeff Childers 
760-252-6000.
EIS No. 20150164, Draft Supplement, BLM, UT, Alton Coal Tract Lease by 
Application, Comment Period Ends: 08/11/2015, Contact: Keith Rigtrup 
435-865-3063.
EIS No. 20150165, Final, APHIS, National, Feral Swine Damage 
Management--A National Approach, Review Period Ends: 07/13/2015, 
Contact: Kimberly Wagner 608-837-2727.
EIS No. 20150166, Final, USFS, CO, Invasive Plant Management for the 
Medicine Bow- Routt National Forests and Thunder Basin National 
Grasslands, Review Period Ends: 07/27/2015, Contact: Misty Hays 307-
358-7102.
EIS No. 20150167, Final, USFS, MT, Como Forest Health Project (FHP), 
Review Period Ends: 07/13/2015, Contact: Sara Grove 406-821-3269.

    Dated: June 9, 2015.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-14435 Filed 6-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```