alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27994-27995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13583]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed Cooperative Research and Development 
Agreement (CRADA) negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is planning to 
enter into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands, CA. 
The purpose of the CRADA is to conduct research and development in the 
management, access, distribution, and application of geospatial data 
related to elevation, hydrologic, watershed, national atlas, raster, 
and image data programs. Any other organization interested in pursuing 
the possibility of a CRADA for similar kinds of activities should 
contact the USGS.

ADDRESSES: Inquiries may be addressed to the Acting Chief of Research, 
U.S. Geological Survey, National Mapping Division, 500 National Center, 
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192; Telephone (703) 
648-4643, facsimile (703) 648-4706; Internet <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c2c2c7c0d0d7ccd1cdcce2d7d1c5d18cc5cdd4">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="482d2a3a3d263b2726083d3b2f3b662f273e">[email protected]</span></a>.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ernest B. Brunson, address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to meet the USGS requirement 
stipulated in the Survey Manual.


[[Page 27995]]


    Dated: May 7, 1998.
Richard E. Witmer,
Chief, National Mapping Division.
[FR Doc. 98-13583 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-Y7-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 12-8765.

#### Davis *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. . Cer-tiorari denied.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

JENNIFER LAUREN, 

Respondent. . 

Docket No. FAA-2015-3318 

FAA Case No. 2014S0275046 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

Comes now the FAA, in view of the Respondent's withdrawal of her appeal and her 

payment of penalty, the Complainant hereby withdraws its Complaint in the above-referenced 

matter. There will, therefore, be no issues for litigation. The FAA moves the administrative law 

judge to dismiss the proceedings. 

Respectfully submitted this] rd day of March, 2016. 

·--z?~~ BRANDON C. GOLDBERG 

Attorney 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division 

Southern Team 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the FAA's Withdrawal of Complaint was mailed this date via 

certified mail, return receipt requested, to: 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2Wl000 

Wilbur Wright Building 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Troy A. Rolf, Esq., Counsel for Respondent 

GKG Law, P.C. 

700 Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Suite 700 

Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 

Jennifer Lauren 

35 E 63'd Street, Apt. 3C 

New York, NY 10065 

Jennifer Lauren 

6286 N Ventana View Pl. 

Tucson, AZ 85750-0706 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dated 

(original+ 1 copy)
*January 16, 2018*

2018-Ohio-115.]

2017-1444.

#### In re Application of Ohio Edison Co.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 14-1297-EL-SSO. On motion of Ohio Energy Group for leave to intervene as appellee. Motion granted.
No. 12-6818.

#### Spencer *v.*Chrones, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2011025EN.01003101.xml

| 28.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/31

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 January 2011

appointing three Swedish members and four Swedish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2011/55/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1).

| (2) | Three members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Kent JOHANSSON, Ms Maria WALLHAGER NECKMAN and Ms Kristina ALVENDAL. Four alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Ms Susanna HABY, Mr Bernth JOHNSON, Mr Jens NILSSON and Ms Ingela NYLUND WATZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Three members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Kent JOHANSSON, Ms Maria WALLHAGER NECKMAN and Ms Kristina ALVENDAL. Four alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Ms Susanna HABY, Mr Bernth JOHNSON, Mr Jens NILSSON and Ms Ingela NYLUND WATZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Mr Kent JOHANSSON, Skara kommun, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Mr Kent JOHANSSON, Skara kommun,

| — | Ms Britt-Marie LÖVGREN, Umeå kommun, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Britt-Marie LÖVGREN, Umeå kommun,

| — | Ms Jelena DRENJANIN, Huddinge kommun, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Jelena DRENJANIN, Huddinge kommun,

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Mr Martin ANDREASSON, Västra Götalands läns landsting, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Mr Martin ANDREASSON, Västra Götalands läns landsting,

| — | Ms Marie SÄLLSTRÖM, Blekinge läns landsting, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Marie SÄLLSTRÖM, Blekinge läns landsting,

| — | Ms Marie-Louise RÖNNMARK, Umeå kommun, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Marie-Louise RÖNNMARK, Umeå kommun,

| — | Ms Carin JÄMTIN, Stockholms kommun. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Carin JÄMTIN, Stockholms kommun.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 January 2011.

For the Council

The President

FAZEKAS S.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22 and OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1810 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1810

     To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to charge fair market value for permits issued on public 
   lands and National Forests for communication uses, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 31 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

  Mr. Bumpers introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to charge fair market value for permits issued on public 
   lands and National Forests for communication uses, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMUNICATION PERMITS.

    (a) In General.--No permit, lease, or authorization for the use of 
any area of the public lands or National Forests for communication 
uses, including but not limited to radio and television broadcast, 
mobile radio, cellular telephone, or microwave relay facilities, shall 
remain in force and effect after October 1, 1994, unless, by such date, 
and by October 1 of each year thereafter, the holder of such permit, 
lease, or authorization pays to the Secretary of the Interior or the 
Secretary of Agriculture, as appropriate, an amount equal to the fair 
market value, as determined by such Secretary, of the right to use and 
occupy such area for such communication uses.
    (b) Definition.--For the purposes of this Act, the term ``public 
lands'' shall have the same meaning as defined in section 103(e) of the 
Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702(e)).

                                 <all>
```
#### Com. v. Peay

03/23/2016

638 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 104
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1789 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        S.1789

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

                                 An Act

  
 
  To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the use of funds 
under the highway bridge replacement and rehabilitation program for 
seismic retrofit of bridges, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BRIDGES.

    Section 144 of title 23, United States Code, is amended_
        (1) in the third sentence of subsection (d), by inserting before 
    the period at the end the following: ``, except that a State may 
    carry out a project for seismic retrofit of a bridge under this 
    section without regard to whether the bridge is eligible for 
    replacement or rehabilitation under this section''; and
        (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the following new 
    sentence: ``The use of funds authorized under this section to carry 
    out a project for the seismic retrofit of a bridge shall not affect 
    the apportionment of funds under this section.''.

                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

   

**QUAD M SOLUTIONS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

   

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Quad M Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

  

|   | 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and                                |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |

 

| Date: August 28,2020 | By:    | */s/ PasqualeDileo*           |        |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Name:  | Pasquale Dileo                |   |
|                 | Title: | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                 |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
#### In the Matter of John J. Sindone, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 438]

*126Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered September 12, 2002, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent Commission’s determination that petitioner lacks the good character, honesty and integrity to work as a principal or employee in New York City’s waste hauling industry, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s argument that he had a due process right to a hearing respecting his qualifications for employment in the trade waste industry in the City of New York is without merit. Petitioner had no property right in being employed as a principal with a licensed carter; respondent Commission’s broad discretion to grant, deny or revoke a carter’s license is preclusive of any claim of entitlement by petitioner to employment within New York City’s trade waste industry *(see Sanitation & Recycling Indus., Inc. v City of New York,*107 F3d 985, 995 [1997]; *Tocci Bros., Inc. v City of New York,*2000 WL 1134367, *9, 2000 US Dist LEXIS 10948, *26-27 [ED NY, Aug. 3, 2000]; *see also*Administrative Code of City of NY§ 16-508 [c]).

The evidence indicating that petitioner gave misleading or untruthful information in connection with, inter alia, his former membership in an indicted trade waste association and his recent applications for employment by carters licensed by the Commission, that petitioner was a member of a trade waste association indicted for antitrust violations, and that he had been a principal in a trade waste business that did business with a known organized crime figure, provided a rational basis for the challenged determination *(see*Administrative Code § 16-509 [a] [i], [vi], [vii]; § 16-520 [j] [i] [aa]; *see generally Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 230-231 [1974]; *Matter of Hollywood Carting Corp. v City of New York,*288 AD2d 71 [2001]).

Petitioner’s argument that he was subjected to impermissible discriminatory treatment by reason of his Italian ancestry is wholly conclusory. There is no indication that respondent treated petitioner differently from other similarly situated individuals *(see Zahra v Town of Southold,*48 F3d 674, 683-684 [1995]). Nor was there any showing to support petitioner’s claim that his associational rights were violated by respondent’s application of Local Law No. 42 (1996) of the City of New York *(see Sanitation & Recycling Indus., Inc.,*107 F3d at 996-1000).

*127We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
Order filed January 8, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00011-CV

____________

J.C. WALTER, III, CAROLE WALTER LOOKE, J.C. WALTER, JR., LTD., 

F. FOX BENTON, III, MORENO ENERGY, INC., WILLIAM C. 

OEHMIG, THE CAIN 1988 DESCENDANTS’ TRUST, MARY H. 

CAIN, MARY H. CAIN MARITAL TRUST, ROBERT D. JOLLY, 

HOWARD CHAPMAN, RUTH B. SMALLEY, ARTHUR, Appellants

V.

MARATHON OIL CORPORATION AND MARATHON E.G. LPG 

LIMITED, Appellees

____________

NO. 14-12-01123-CV

____________

J.C. WALTER, III, CAROLE WALTER LOOKE, J.C. WALTER, JR., LTD., 

F. FOX BENTON, III, MORENO ENERGY, INC., WILLIAM C. 

OEHMIG, THE CAIN 1988 DESCENDANTS’ TRUST, MARY H. 

CAIN, MARY H. CAIN MARITAL TRUST, ROBERT D. JOLLY, 

HOWARD CHAPMAN, RUTH B. SMALLEY, ARTHUR, Relators
2

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-58805

ORDER

On January 4, 2012, appellants filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order 

signed December 15, 2011. That appeal was assigned to this court under our appellate 

case number 14-12-00011-CV. On December 14, 2012, the same parties filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus complaining of the same order. The original proceeding has been 

assigned our case number 14-12-01123-CV. 

Today, the court, on its own motion, orders the appeal and original proceeding 

CONSOLIDATED. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32.B****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2006, of ANR PipelineCompany (the “Company”) as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John R. Sult, Senior VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Controller, certify(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ John R. Sult       John R. Sult *Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer* *and Controller* *(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)*   May 5, 2006     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to ANR Pipeline Company andwill be retained by ANR Pipeline Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1541

To provide that a nongovernmental person may use a private express for

the private carriage of certain letters and packets without being penalized

by the Postal Service, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1993

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide that a nongovernmental person may use a private

express for the private carriage of certain letters and

packets without being penalized by the Postal Service,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE CARRIAGE OF CERTAIN LETTERS AND

4 PACKETS.

5 (a) POSTAL SERVICE ADMINISTRATION.—(1) Section

6 601(a) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by

7 striking out ‘‘A letter’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘Sub8 ject to the provisions of section 607, a letter’’.
2

•S 1541 IS

1 (2)(A) Chapter 6 of title 39, United States Code, is

2 amended by adding after section 606 the following new

3 section:

4 ‘‘§ 607. Administration relating to certain letters and

5 packets

6 ‘‘In the administration of the provisions of this chap7 ter and chapter 4 of this title by the Postal Service or

8 the Attorney General of the United States and in the ad9 ministration of sections 1693 through 1699 of title 18 by

10 the Attorney General of the United States, the Postal

11 Service or the Attorney General of the United States, re12 spectively, may not fine or otherwise penalize any person

13 who transmits by private express or other unlawful means,

14 or delivers to any agent thereof, or deposits at any ap15 pointed place, for the purpose of being so transmitted any

16 letter or packet.’’.

17 (B) The table of sections for chapter 6 of title 39,

18 United States Code, is amended by adding after the item

19 relating to section 606 the following:

‘‘607. Administration relating to certain letters and packets.’’.

20 (b) PRIVATE EXPRESS PROVISIONS.—(1) Chapter 83

21 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—

22 (A) in section 1696—

23 (i) by striking out subsection (b); and

24 (ii) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub25 section (b); and
3

•S 1541 IS

1 (B) by inserting after section 1699 the follow2 ing new section:

3 ‘‘§ 1699A. Application of postal service provisions

4 ‘‘The provisions of sections 1693 through 1699 of

5 this title shall be subject to the provisions of section 607

6 of title 39.’’.

7 (2) The table of sections for chapter 83 of title 18,

8 United States Code, is amended by inserting after the

9 item relating to section 1699 the following:

‘‘1699A. Application of Postal Service provisions.’’.

Æ
No. 12-716.

#### Dalal *v.*Krantz & Berman LLP.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, J. David Smith, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of Euramax International, Inc., certify that:

 

1.                    Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Euramax International, Inc.;

 

2.                    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  | March 25,  2004 | By:    | /s/ J. David Smith                                |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            | Title: | Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer  and President |

 

----