alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|No chart available.                                              
|No chart available.                                              
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Wisconsin Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/03

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 03 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 10-Q
                               AMENDMENT NUMBER 1

                  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                    For the quarter ended: September 30, 1997


                         Commission file number: 1- 448


                                   MESTEK,INC.


                            Pennsylvania Corporation


                       I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
                                  25 - 0661650


                              260 North Elm Street
                         Westfield, Massachusetts 01085


                            Telephone: (413) 568-9571


The Registrant has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 during the  preceding 12 months and has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

The number of shares of Common  Stock  outstanding  as of October  31,  1997 was
8,926,430.


This  amendment  covers the addition of four  exhibits to the  previously  filed
10-Q.



                                                         1

<PAGE>





                                            PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K


     (a) Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings...Page 11.

     (b) Registrant  did not file a Form 8-K during the  quarter for which this
         report is filed.

     (c) EXHIBIT INDEX

         Exhibit No.
         Description
         **************

         10.1     Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 27, 1997,
                  between Formtek, Inc. (Purchaser) and Joseph Julian (Seller).

         10.2     Lease Agreement dated January 1, 1997 between
                  Pacific/Air Balance, Inc. (Lessee) and Production
                  Realty Corp. (Lessor).

         10.3     Amended and  Restated  Revolving  Loans and  Foreign  Exchange
                  Facilities Agreement dated July 15, 1997 between Mestek, Inc.
                  (Borrower) and BankBoston, N.A.(Bank).

         10.4     Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreements entered
                  into between Mestek, Inc. and certain executives of the
                  Corporation, as set forth in the attached schedule.


<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



                                   MESTEK,INC.
                                  (Registrant)

Date: November 3, 1997

                                 /S/ Stephen M. Shea
                                 Stephen M. Shea
                                 Senior Vice President - Finance
                                 (Chief Financial Officer)



                                       11
2015-0290.

#### Mahoning Cty. Bar. Assn. v. Gerchak.

On respondent’s application for termination of probation. Motion granted. Probation of respondent, David John Gerchak, Attorney Registration No. 0069060, last known business address in Youngstown, Ohio, terminated.
No. 12-8398.

#### Nesbitt *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7088** 

JERRY WAYNE MELTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. CARLTON JOYNER, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00145

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVI S , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jerry Wayne Melton, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not bindi ng precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jerry Wayne Melton seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap pealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a p risoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 3 22, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Melton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Melton’s motion for transcripts, and dismiss the appeal. We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Com. v. Merklinger18

03/23/2016

896 MAL (2015)

18

. Justice DOUGHERTY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 109
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 2, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Orchard Valley Financial Corporation, Englewood, Colorado; to 
acquire MegaBank Financial Corporation, Englewood, Colorado; and 
thereby indirectly acquire MegaBank of Englewood, Colorado, Englewood, 
Colorado, and thereby engage in the operation of a savings association, 
pursuant to Sec.  225.28(b)(4) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 13, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-13128 Filed 5-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 051198A]


Marine Mammals; File No. 704-1444

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that University of Alaska Museum, 907 
Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775-1200, (Principal Investigator: Gordon 
H. Jarrell, Ph.D.) has been issued a permit to collect, import/export 
marine mammal specimens for purposes of scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/
713-2289); and
    Alaska Region, NMFS, P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802-1668 (907/
586-7221).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson, 301/713-2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 13, 1998, notice was published 
in the Federal Register (63 FR 7403) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to collect, import/export marine mammal specimens had 
been submitted by the above-named organization. The requested permit 
has been issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing 
the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), the regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting 
of endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR parts 217-227), and the Fur 
Seal Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.).
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: May 15, 1998.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-13765 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

p0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148801

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148801

COA: 319191

Wayne CC: 12

- 004295

- FC

ROVELLE LAMONT HENDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# DLA Finance’s Van Sickler presented with commanders coin

/ Published March 15, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Finance Business Analyst, Michelle Van Sickler received a commander’s coin during DLA Distribution commanding officer Navy Rear Adm. Kevin M. Jones’ employee recognition event Feb. 1.

Upon announcement of a DLA Office of Inspector General’s inspection of Distribution’s Small Arms Major End Item Rates, Van Sickler put forth great efforts to provide the Office of Inspector General with extensive information on Army small arms workload, budgeting and rate setting as far back as fiscal year 2015.  

Van Sickler walked the OIG through the program budget review process, explaining the intricacies in developing a budget submission as diverse as DLA Distribution’s requirements.  Her ongoing efforts have informed the OIG of every data point requested.
No. 12-803.

#### Baisden *v.*I’m Ready Productions, Inc., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL S. YELLEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 16344

D.C. No. 1:14

- cv
- 00134

- JMS

BMK

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted August 16, 2016 **

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Michael S. Yellen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his action alleging violations of

federal constitutional law and international law arising from the 1893 overthrow of

the Hawai ian monarc hy and Hawaii’ s subsequent annexation by the United States

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 24 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 16344

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Pakootas v.

Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. , 646 F.3d 1214, 1218 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Yel len’s action because his claims
presented non

-

justiciable political questions over which the district court lacked
subject matter jurisdiction. S ee Corrie v. Caterpillar, Inc. , 503 F.3d 974, 980 (9th
Cir. 2007) ( holding that “the presence of a political question deprives a court of
subject matter jurisdiction ” and explaining that a non

- justiciable political question

is found when there is “ a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the

issue to a coordinate political department” (citation and i nternal quotation marks
omitted) )

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing without leave to

amend. See McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger , 369 F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2004)
( finding “[t] he district court did not err in denying leave to a mend because

a mendment would have been futile ”).
In light of our disposition, we do not address the merits of Yellen’s claims.
We reject as without merit Yellen’s contention that he was entitled to
discovery.3 14

- 16344

Yellen’ s expedited motion for injunctive reli ef and/or permanent injunction , filed on July 15, 2016, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          29,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,906,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,407,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,137,296
<PP&E>                                      25,554,133
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,822,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,873,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,566,248
<BONDS>                                      2,439,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       638,525
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,317,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,873,912
<SALES>                                     10,449,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,449,541
<CGS>                                        9,040,367
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,040,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               778,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,346
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                562,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                   191,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            371,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   371,555
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Hoolae Paoa, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mid-State Raceway, Inc.
and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 22, 2004
/s/ Hoolae Paoa
Hoolae Paoa
President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       18