alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Tennessee Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Tennessee Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 7      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Thomas C. Golombek, Respondent, v John A. Monahan, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[768 NYS2d 879]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of Supreme Court, Erie County (Marshall, J.), entered January 6, 2003, upon a decision of the court in favor of plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contentions of John A. Monahan (defendant), Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiff’s motion seeking partial summary judgment against defendant on the issue of liability for amounts due upon his default in making payments under a mortgage modification agreement. Defendant contends that the agreement is not an enforceable promissory note because it does not contain a promise to pay. The mortgage modification agreement, however, did not modify defendant’s express promise to pay under the original bond and mortgage. Defendant also contends that the parties entered into an oral agreement subsequent to the execution of the mortgage modification agreement that temporarily reduced the monthly mortgage payments until defendant’s financial condition improved. The bond and mortgage, however, expressly provides that it cannot be modified “except in writing signed by [the] Mortgagee.” That term was not modified by the mortgage modification agreement and thus remains in full force and effect *(see FGH Realty Credit Corp. v VRD Realty Corp.,*231 AD2d 489, 491 [1996], *lv dismissed*89 NY2d 981 [1997]). Defendant’s further contention that the rate of interest under the bond and mortgage is usurious because the amount loaned was less than the amount stated is “conclusory and unsubstantiated” *(Tower Funding v Berry Realty,*302 AD2d 513, 515 [2003]) and otherwise without merit. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
# L_2010288EN.01001201.xml

| 5.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 991/2010

of 4 November 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Olive de Nîmes (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name ‘Olive de Nîmes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name ‘Olive de Nîmes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 November 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 44, 20.2.2010, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Olive de Nîmes (PDO)

---
NO. 12-10-00395-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: §

RICHARD RANDLE, § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Relator Richard Randle filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing 

the trial court to rule on his “Motion for Reformation of Sentence.” We have received 

documentation showing that, on December 14, 2010, the trial court ruled on Relator’s motion. 

Accordingly, his petition for writ of mandamus is now moot and is dismissed.

Opinion delivered December 22, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1673

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad

Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr.,

United States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BREAUX (for himself and Mr. JOHNSTON) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 Broad Street, in Lake Charles, Louisiana,

as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF EDWIN FORD HUNTER, JR.,

4 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse under construction (as

6 of the date of enactment of this Act) at 611 Broad Street,

7 in Lake Charles, Louisiana, shall be known and des-
2

•S 1673 IS

1 ignated as the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States

2 Courthouse’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the court6 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref7 erence to the ‘‘Edwin Ford Hunter, Jr., United States

8 Courthouse’’.

Æ
1

Cole, David

From: Wood, Gil

Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 10:29 AM

To: Cole, David

Cc: Wood, Gil

Subject: June 5, 2014 Meeting with the Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association

On June 5, 2014, representatives of the Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association (HPBA) met with Greg Green, Chebryll 

Edwards, Amanda Aldridge and Gil Wood. The representatives included Jack Goldman, Ryan Carroll, and John Crouch of 

HPBA and Bob Ferguson of Ferguson Andors & Company, consultant to HPBA. The meeting focused on HPBA 

presenting highlights of their May 2, 2014 comments which they submitted to the docket. No new information was 

presented. 

Gil Wood
NJDEP HZSAMPLE Error Report

File: C:\Datamgt\NJ EDD\cwk\DGW 2H10\PFOA\HZSAMPLE

Date: 03/21/2011 16:23

Errors#: (0)

No HZSAMPLE errors have been identified!
No. 12-607.

#### Kiehle *v.*County of Cortland, New York, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-8384.

#### Peterson *v.*Seaman.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Chafin*v. *Chafin, ante,*p. 165.
2017-0950.

#### State v. Gladwell.

Butler App. No. CA2016-07-139, 2017-Ohio-0331. On review of an order certifying a conflict. It is determined that no conflict exists. Cause dismissed.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1481

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-ethyl-6-fluoro-1,4-
      dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinolinecarboxcylic acid 
                             (norfloxacin).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself and Mr. Bradley) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1-ethyl-6-fluoro-1,4-
     dihydro-4-oxo-7-(1-piperazinyl)-3-quinoline- carboxcylic acid 
                             (norfloxacin).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORFLOXACIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.30.85 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to norfloxacin) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by this Act applies 
        with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse 
        for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the 
        Tariff Act of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper 
        request filed with the appropriate customs officer on or before 
        the 90th day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any 
        entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of an 
        article described in subheading 9902.30.85 of the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States that was made--
                    (A) after December 31, 1992, and
                    (B) before the date which is 15 days after the date 
                of the enactment of this Act,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry 
        occurred on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1626 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1626

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the veterans' home 
                             loan program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             November 4 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. DeConcini, Mr. Graham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
 Daschle,  and Mr. Campbell) introduced the following bill; which was 
     read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the veterans' home 
                             loan program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Home Loan Improvement Act 
of 1993''.

SEC. 2. REVISION IN COMPUTATION OF AGGREGATE GUARANTY.

    Section 3702(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out paragraph (1) and inserting in lieu 
        thereof the following new paragraph (1):
            ``(1) the loan has been repaid in full, or the Secretary 
        has been released from liability as to the loan, or if the 
        Secretary has suffered a loss on the loan, the loss has been 
        paid in full; or'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking out ``; or'' and 
        inserting in lieu thereof a period; and
            (3) by striking out paragraph (3) and all that follows 
        through the end of the subsection.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO GUARANTEE HOME REFINANCE LOANS FOR ENERGY 
              EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Loans.--(1) Section 3710(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding after paragraph (10) the following:
            ``(11) To refinance in accordance with subsection (e) of 
        this section an existing loan guaranteed, insured, or made 
        under this chapter, and to improve the dwelling securing such 
        loan through energy efficiency improvements, as provided in 
        subsection (d) of this section.''.
    (2) Section 3710(e)(1) of such title is amended by inserting ``or 
subsection (a)(11)'' after ``subsection (a)(8)''.
    (b) Fee.--Section 3729(a)(2)(E) of such title is amended by 
inserting ``3710(a)(11),'' after ``3710(a)(9)(B)(i),''.

                                 <all>
```
exv10w55



 





Exhibit 10.55




AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 2002 INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN




     The 2002 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended effective as of May 19,
2006 (the “Effective Date”) with respect to all Options granted pursuant to the Plan, including
grants outstanding before the Effective Date, as set forth below.




	1.	 	The Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph:
	 
	 	 	 16. EFFECT OF MERGER. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, in the event
that the Company is merged (the “Merger”) into another company (the “Merger Sub”)
after a majority of the Company’s Common Stock has been purchased by the parent of
the Merger Sub through a tender offer, then all outstanding stock options granted
under this Plan, whether vested or unvested, will terminate as of the close of the
Merger in exchange for a cash payment equal to the difference per option share of
the per share value of the consideration to be received by common stockholders in
the Merger and the per share exercise price for each option.
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 7,120  | 6,738 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6,790  | 6,629  | 5,436  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2010158EN.01000501.xml

| 18.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/5

---

COUNCIL ACT

of 23 October 2009

appointing a Deputy Director of Europol

2010/C 158/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Convention on the establishment of a European Police Office (Europol Convention) (1), and in particular Article 29(2) thereof,

1

Acting as the authority vested with the power to appoint Deputy Director of Europol,

Having regard to the opinion of the Management Board,

Whereas:

| (1) | Following the request for resignation of a Deputy Director of Europol, which was granted by the Council (2), it is necessary to appoint a Deputy Director. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Following the request for resignation of a Deputy Director of Europol, which was granted by the Council (2), it is necessary to appoint a Deputy Director.

2

| (2) | The Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (3), and in particular their Appendix 8, establish special provisions on the procedure for the selection of the Director or a Deputy Director of Europol. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Staff Regulations applicable to Europol employees (3), and in particular their Appendix 8, establish special provisions on the procedure for the selection of the Director or a Deputy Director of Europol.

3

| (3) | The Management Board presented the Council with a short list of suitable applicants for appointment, together with the full file of each of those applicants, as well as the full list of the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Board presented the Council with a short list of suitable applicants for appointment, together with the full file of each of those applicants, as well as the full list of the applicants.

| (4) | On the basis of all relevant information provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to appoint the applicant who, according to the Council, meets all the requirements of the vacant position of Deputy Director, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On the basis of all relevant information provided by the Management Board, the Council wishes to appoint the applicant who, according to the Council, meets all the requirements of the vacant position of Deputy Director,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Antonius DRIESSEN is hereby appointed as Deputy Director of Europol from 1 November 2009 to 31 October 2013.

Article 2

This Act shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Luxembourg, 23 October 2009.

For the Council

The President

T. BILLSTRÖM

---

(1)  OJ C 316, of 27.11.1995, p. 2.

1

(2)  Doc. 11637/09.

2

(3)  See Council Act of 3 December 1998 laying down the staff regulations applicable to Europol employees (OJ C 26, of 30.1.1999, p. 23).

3

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 26, 2023 No. 04-22-00834-CV IN RE Stephen Patrick BLACK Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 

### O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice On December 12, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the petition, real party in interest’s response, and the record, this court concluded relator did not show he was entitled to the relief sought and denied relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on January 4, 2023. On January 17, 2023, relator filed a motion for rehearing requesting this court reconsider its January 4, 2023 order. After consideration, relator’s motion for rehearing is DENIED
. It is so ORDERED on January 26, 2023. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV-15-1805, styled In re: the Commitment of Stephen Patrick Black, pending in the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas, the Honorable Gary L. Steel presiding.
No. 12-8471.

#### Flint *v.*Crews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.