28512 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 100 /Tuesday, May 26, 1998 / Notices

eight month requirement is warranted. If

the information were not collected the

Commission’s information regarding

actual loading of frequencies would be

inaccurate.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0286.

Expiration Date: 4/30/2001.

Title: 80.302 Notice of

discontinuance, reduction, or

impairment of service involving a

distress watch.

Form Number: Not applicable.

Estimated Annual Burden: 160 hours;

1 hour per respondent; 160 respondents.

Description: This rule is needed to

ensure that the U.S. Coast Guard is

informed when a coast station

discontinues, reduces or impairs a

listening watch required to be

maintained on a marine safety

frequency.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0330.

Expiration Date: 4/30/2001.

Title: Part 62—Applications to Hold

Interlocking Directorates.

Form Number: N/A.

Estimated annual burden: 20 hours; 2

hours per response; 10 respondents.

Description: Congress mandated this

information collection under 47 USC

212 to be conducted by the FCC to

monitor the effect of interlocking

directorates on the telecommunications

industry and to ensure they will not

have any anticompetitive impact.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0361.

Expiration Date: 4/30/2001.

Title: 80.29 Changes during license

term.

Form Number: Not applicable.

Estimated annual burden: 250 hours;

1 hour per response; 250 respondents.

Description: The information is used

by the FCC to update the coast and ship

station license files and data base

concerning current name and address of

licensees. Information concerning

changes in the names of vessels is also

used to update the ITU List of Ship

Stations.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0807.

Expiration Date: 4/30/2001.

Title: 47 CFR Section 51.803 and

Supplemental Procedures for Petitions

Pursuant to Section 252(e)(5) of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended.

Form Number: Not applicable.

Estimated annual burden: 2,040

hours; 39.23 hours (average) per

response; 52 respondents.

Description: Any interested party

seeking preemption of a state

commission’s jurisdiction based on the

state commission’s failure to act shall

notify the Commission (47 USC

252(e)(5) and 47 CFR Section 51.803). In

a Public Notice the Commission set out

procedures for filing petitions for

preemption pursuant to section

252(e)(5). All the information will be

used to ensure that petitioners have

complied with their obligations under

the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–13811 Filed 5–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Petition P3–98]

In Re: The Impact of Modern

Technology on the Customs and

Practices of the Freight Forwarding

Industry—Petition for Rulemaking;

Notice of Filing of Petition

Notice is given that a petition for

rulemaking or, alternatively, for a

declaratory order, has been filed by R.F.

International Ltd. (‘‘Petitioner’’).

Petitioner seeks a rulemaking to address

and evaluate the impact of modern

technology on the customs and practices

of the freight forwarding industry and

the regulations governing those customs

and practices. Petitioner seeks review of

guidelines regarding freight forwarding,

freight forwarding fees, and freight

forwarder compensation in view of

trends in high-technology freight

forwarding and seeks guidelines for the

provision of ‘‘in-plant’’ forwarding

services provided by licensed freight

forwarders.

In the event of denial of this petition

for rulemaking, Petitioner requests that

this petition be treated as a request for

a declaratory order to allow Petitioner to

act without peril on its own view.

Interested persons are requested to

reply to the petition no later than June

25, 1998. Replies shall specify the

desired disposition of the petition and

to the extent applicable, shall specify

the substance of any rule or order

supported. Replies shall be directed to

the Secretary, Federal Maritime

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573–

0001, shall consist of an original and 15

copies, and shall be served on counsel

for Petitioner, Leonard L. Fleisig, Esq.

Eckert, Seamans, Cherin and Mellott

LLC, 1250 24th Street, N.W., Suite 700,

Washington, D.C. 20007.

Copies of the petition are available for

examination at the Washington, D.C.

Office of the Secretary of the

Commission, 800 N. Capitol Street,

N.W., Room 1046.

Joseph C. Polking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–13842 Filed 5–22–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention

Advisory Committee on Immunization

Practices: Meeting

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of

the Federal Advisory Committee Act

(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease

Control and Prevention (CDC)

announces the following committee

meeting.

Name: Advisory Committee on

Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Times and Dates: 8:15 a.m.–6:15 p.m., June

24, 1998; 8:00 a.m.–4:00 p.m., June 25, 1998.

Place: CDC, Auditorium B, Building 2,

1600 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30333.

Status: Open to the public, limited only by

the space available.

Purpose: The Committee is charged with

advising the Director, CDC, on the

appropriate uses of immunizing agents. In

addition, under 42 U.S.C. 1396s, the

Committee is mandated to establish and

periodically review and, as appropriate,

revise a list of vaccines for administration to

vaccine-eligible children through the

Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, along

with schedules regarding the appropriate

periodicity, dosage, and contraindications

applicable to the vaccines.

Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items

include a summary of the meeting on

‘‘Evaluating the Role of Vaccines and

Infectious Diseases in Autoimmune Disease:

Insulin Dependent (Type 1) Diabetes

Mellitus’; updates on the National

Immunization Program; the Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program; the National Vaccine

Program; and HIV vaccine. Also on the

agenda, a discussion of financial disclosure

and voting protocol for ACIP; rotavirus

vaccine data on differences in morbidity by

socioeconomic group, update on cost benefit

data, use of vaccine in premature infants, and

rotavirus disease in immunocompromised

persons; a review of changes in the draft

rabies vaccine recommendation; computer

algorithms for ACIP recommendations;

hepatitis A vaccine; consolidate resolutions

currently included in the VFC Program;

harmonizing recommendation on

combination vaccines with the American

Academy of Pediatrics and the American

Academy of Family Physicians; use of lyme

disease vaccine; progress towards

development of a revised influenza

recommendation; and intravenous

immunoglobulin products. Other matters of

relevance among the Committee’s objectives

may be discussed.