alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2
                       AMENDMENTS TO STOCK OPTION PLAN


                         1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR
                         OUTSIDE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS
                              AND EMPLOYEES OF
                           FALMOUTH BANCORP, INC.

                        (Adopted on November 19, 1996
                      Effective as of January 21, 1997)

                                  AMENDMENT
                                  ---------

1.    Article III - Effective as of December 13, 1997, the second sentence
of section 3.1 shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:

      A maximum aggregate of 101,815 Shares shall be granted to Eligible
      Employees and a maximum aggregate of 43,666 Shares shall be granted
      to Eligible Directors.

2.    Article V - Effective as of December 13, 1997, the first sentence in
section 5.1(a) shall be amended by replacing the period at the end thereof
with a semicolon and adding the following clause immediately thereafter to
read as follows:

      provided, however, that, notwithstanding the restrictions in the
      immediately preceding clause, effective as of December 13, 1997, an
      additional Option to purchase 666 Shares shall be granted to the
      Chairman of the Board on December 13, 1997.


                                EXHIBIT 10.2
                       AMENDMENTS TO STOCK OPTION PLAN


                            Amendment Number Two
                                   to the
                1997 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors,
            Officers and Employees of Falmouth Co-operative Bank

                                FIRST CHANGE

      The second sentence of Section 3.1 is deleted in its entirety and the
following sentence is substituted in its place:

      "An aggregate maximum of 48,032 Shares may be granted to Eligible
      Directors."


                                SECOND CHANGE

      The following sentence is added to the end of Section 5.1:

      "Thereafter, the Board may in its discretion grant to an Eligible
      Director an Option to purchase a number of Shares determined by it,
      subject to the any limitations imposed by the Plan or applicable
      law."


                           THIRD AND FINAL CHANGE

      The following sentence is added to the end of Section 5.3:

      "Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to the limitations of
      applicable law, each Option granted to an Eligible Director under the
      Plan after the Effective Date shall become exercisable at the times
      and upon the conditions specified by the Board in the Option
      agreement; provided, however, that an Option shall become fully
      exercisable on the date of the Option holder's death, Disability or
      Change in Control if he is then an Eligible Director."

      The Plan as previously adopted is hereby ratified and confirmed in
      all other respects.
DLA Distribution San Joaquin’s Randleman promoted to lieutenant
 
  By Annette Silva, DLA Distribution San Joaquin Public Affairs
  During an afternoon ceremony, Navy Lt J.G. Robert Randleman, operations officer of Defense Logistics Agency Distribution San Joaquin, California, was promoted to his new rank of Lt. in the company of his family, friends and co-workers. San Joaquin Commander Marine Col. Tiffany Harris provided remarks and administered the Oath of Office to Randleman before promoting him to his new rank. Upon completion of the oath, Randleman’s wife, Whitney, replaced his shoulder boards to the rank of Lt. Randleman was proud to share his promotion with his co-workers and his family who were not able in the past to witness this Navy tradition. He went on to thank his DLA family for what they do every day.
“It is interesting how the fleet does not know what DLA does for the big logistics game and I know as a submariner that we could not successfully do our mission out at sea if you are not working hard out here [distribution center],” said Randleman. “It’s an honor to be part of this team and see the mission for myself as a young officer and it’s going to go into my tool bag for me to bring back to the Navy.”
He concluded his remarks by giving special thanks to his parents and to his wife for her support. 
“I had a good job in Santa Rosa and told my wife, ‘let’s go.’ Of course, it was not an immediate yes, but she has been an absolute blessing and trooper through all of this [navy career]. It’s not fair what we do to our spouses, but they serve right along side of us. They are the ones back home taking care of finances and family,” concluded Randleman.
Randleman graduated from Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park, California, with a bachelor’s degree in business administration, with a focus in accounting. While in school, he worked at U.S. Bank. 
After college, he continued to work for U.S. Bank as a banker and was involved in a management development program. He was struggling to find fulfillment in a corporate career, and he had always desired to serve in the military. After speaking with his wife, he contacted a naval officer recruiter to speak about career opportunities.
After about a year of perseverance he was accepted to attend Officer Candidate School to be commissioned as a Navy supply officer. Randleman completed 12 weeks of Officer Candidate School and was commissioned as a Naval Officer Aug. 14, 2015.  He is the first one in his immediate family to be a part of the military.
After completing all his division officer, department head and submarine officer training he reported to the USS NEW MEXICO (Virginia Class, Fast Attack Submarine) as the supply department head July 2016. He completed a European command deployment and a shipyard availability Period.
His personal decorations include the Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal and the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal.
No. 12-8986.

No. 12-8998.

No. 12-9020.

No. 12-9030.

#### In re Harper; In re Mosley; In re Miles; and In re Crissup.

Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.
Memorandum

To United States Department of Energy

From Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Defense Council

Date June 13, 2012

Re Ex Parte Communication

On Monday, June 11, 2012, representatives of several States and representatives of

several non

‐ profit energy efficiency organizations met with representatives of the

Department of Energy to discuss the Notice of Proposed Rulemak ing for Energy

Conservation Standards for Battery Chargers and External Power Supplies, Docket No.

EERE

‐ 2008

‐ BT

‐ STD

‐ 0005, 77 Fed. Reg. 18478 (March 27, 2012). The efficiency advocates

discussed a number of flaws in the analysis published by the Department of Energy,

including the estimate of costs for more effi cient products and the baseline energy use

assumed in the analysis.

The following individuals were present:

Kathleen Hogan, DOE

John Cymbalsky, DOE

Jeremy Dommu, DOE

Andrew DeLaski, Appliance Standards Awareness Project

Joanna Mauer, Appliance Standards Awareness Project

David Hungerford, California Energy Commission

Benjamin Longstreth, Natural Resources Def ense Council

Jeff Harris, Alliance to Save Energy

Jennifer Amann, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy

David Terry, National Association of State Energy Officials

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Benjamin Longstreth

Natural Resources Defense Council
#### Com. v. Bailey

10/22/2015

178 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1132
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 201 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 201

To amend Bankruptcy Rule 7004 to require that service of process on an 
   insured depository institution be made by personal service on an 
                      officer of the institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend Bankruptcy Rule 7004 to require that service of process on an 
   insured depository institution be made by personal service on an 
                      officer of the institution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERVICE OF PROCESS IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS ON AN INSURED 
              DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION.

    Rule 7004 of the Bankruptcy Rules is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b) by striking ``In addition'' and 
        inserting ``Except as provided in subdivision (h), in 
        addition''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subdivision:
    ``(h) Service of Process on an Insured Depository Institution.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of this rule or any other rule or 
law, service on an insured depository institution (as defined in 
section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813)) shall 
be made by personal service on an officer of the institution.''.

                                 <all>
```
# Georgian Army Representatives Visit the Eastern Distribution Center

/ Published Oct. 4, 2019
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Members of the U.S. Army Security Assistance Command and Office of Defense Cooperation, representing the Georgian Army, visited the Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania’s Eastern Distribution Center Sept. 5.

The guide for the tour added some interesting facts that included that the EDC is the largest warehouse within the Department of Defense. The purpose of the USASAC and ODC visit was to learn how material is stored, picked and shipped so they may better communicate with DLA’s Georgian foreign partners how material is delivered to them.

“This is very helpful to me because I serve in the country of Georgia and I am seeing how things work here firsthand,” said Army Major Sebastian Engels, deputy chief, Office of Defense Cooperation. “I was actually on vacation in Maine but I wanted to see things firsthand so I made a detour before I return to Georgia.”

Engels said that the tour helped him see how things move through the facility and how material is handled and believes it will improve his ability to do his job.

“I see that as the products move, more than one person checks to ensure that they are the right ones and they are labeled properly,” said Engels. “Now I can explain that process. Anytime you are dealing with a foreign partner and you can explain things in detail like that, it adds to your credibility. It instills confidence in your partner nation that you know what you are talking about.”
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 7.56   | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2000-1540.

#### State v. Hutton.

Cuyahoga App. No. 51704. On appellee’s motion to set an execution date. Motion granted. Percy Hutton’s sentence shall be carried into execution by the warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, or in his absence, by the deputy warden, on Wednesday, June 22, 2022, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

O’Neill, J., dissents for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in *State v. Wogenstahl,*134 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2013-Ohio-164, 981 N.E.2d 900.
# Get gassed up

/ Published Jan. 28, 2019
OSAN AIR BASE, Republic of Korea , *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Osan Air Base website.*
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Urban von Euler, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 24Holdings Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  April 15, 2005


By:  /s/ Urban von Euler
     ---------------------------------------
     Name:     Urban von Euler
     Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1732

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 20, 1993

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To extend arbitration under the provisions of chapter 44

of title 28, United States Code, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1732 RFH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ARBITRATION.

2 (a) AMENDMENT OF REPEAL.—Section 906 of the

3 Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act (28

4 U.S.C. 651 note; Public Law 100–702; 102 Stat. 4664)

5 is amended in the first sentence by striking out ‘‘5 years

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act’’ and inserting

7 in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1994’’.

8 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

9 905 of the Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice

10 Act (28 U.S.C. 651 note; Public Law 100–702; 102 Stat.

11 4664) is amended in the first sentence by striking out ‘‘4’’

12 and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘7’’.

Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
2017-0345.

#### State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen’s Benevolent Assn. v. Warren.

Trumbull App. No. 2015-T-0017. Cause remanded to the court of appeals for lack of a final, appealable order. Appellant’s request for oral argument denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, French, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Kennedy, J., dissents.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### Northfield Insurance Company, Appellant, v Midtown Restorations LLC, Defendant, and Fortuna Pheasant Close LLC, Respondent.

[50 NYS3d 369]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered May 16, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as against defendant Fortuna Pheasant Close LLC (Fortuna), unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and it is declared that plaintiff has no duty to defend or indemnify any entity in the underlying property damage action. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 26, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The record establishes that plaintiff is entitled to the declaration sought, where the underlying action seeks damages in connection with the insured’s (Midtown) waterproofing work of Fortuna’s premises. The subject insurance policy’s Classification Limitation endorsement, as reflected in the Declarations page, limits the scope of coverage to four classifications, none of which encompass waterproofing, thereby precluding coverage *(see Black Bull Contr., LLC v Indian Harbor Ins. Co.,*135 AD3d 401, 403 [1st Dept 2016]; *New York City Hous. Auth. v United States Underwriters Ins. Co.,*7 AD3d 393 [1st Dept 2004]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1

















CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned, A. F. Petrocelli, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of United Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify,
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) that:







1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  November
5, 2008





By:
              /s/
      A. F. PetrocelliA.
      F. PetrocelliChairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                            
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Calexico, CA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | W   | W   |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donnell Genyard, Appellant.

[51 NYS3d 422]

Application by the appellant dated August 5, 2016, for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 31, 2011 *(People v Genyard,*84 AD3d 1398 [2011]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 17, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

Dillon, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.
No. 12-8047.

#### Furesz *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.