alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Utah Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 76,705 | 78,367 | 74,399 | 72,492
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 66,223 | 60,392 | 54,722 | 49,918 | 46,680 | 43,730 | 40,973 | 37,408 | 34,710 | 32,335
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 30,444 | 29,040 | 27,676 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
CAAP-11-0000335

#### Waiolama v. State

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1190

GLORIA JEAN JORDAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOURNAL NEWSPAPERS, INCORPORATED; DONALD FARRIER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr.,

Magistrate Judge. (CA-97-733-A)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 15, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gloria Jean Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Elaine Charlson Bredehoft,

CHARLSON & BREDEHOFT, P.C., Reston, Virginia; John Michael

Bredehoft, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, McLean, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gloria Jordan appeals the magistrate judge's order granting

Defendants' motion for summary judgment on her claim that The Journal Newspaper failed to hire her on the basis of race in violation

of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§

2000(e) - 2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and pendent state law

defamation claims. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate

judge's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Jordan v. Journal

Newspapers, Inc., No. CA-97-733-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 5, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Yemen (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Freeport, TX LNG Imports (Price) from Yemen (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | 10.30  | 12.00  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The PULLMAN COMPANY, Appellant, v. Florence R. RICE and Jack S. Rice, Appellees.

No. 13601.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 14, 1950.

William F. McGehee, R. L. Dent, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellant.

Landman Teller, Vicksburg, Miss., for appellees.

Before HOLMES, WALLER and BOR-AH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Wc think that the facts in this case justified the presentation to the jury of the issue as to punitive damages and that such issue was submitted to the jury under appropriate instructions; wherefore, the verdicts should not be disturbed, and the judgments appealed from should be, and they are,

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              1,474
<SECURITIES>                       42,512
<RECEIVABLES>                     155,536
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       117,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  326,894
<PP&E>                            422,201
<DEPRECIATION>                    197,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    757,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             326,186
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                           56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                         65,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      757,387
<SALES>                           520,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  520,015
<CGS>                             273,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     273,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  264,837
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 21,229
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                       (3,457)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 1,823
<DISCONTINUED>                      5,847
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (4,024)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.09)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

November 13, 2003

                                             /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Venerando J. Indelicato
                                             Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10251 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JEFFREY SIMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-268-1-Y

- - - - - - - - - - August 24, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Jeffrey Simpson, the federal public defender (FPD), has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Simpson has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2018, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company.



**By:* */s/ Sheldon Karasik*Name: Sheldon KarasikTitle: Chairman of the Board/Chief Executive Officer*

Date: February 13, 2019



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company and will be retained by Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2011170EN.01004301.xml

| 30.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 170/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 170/43

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2010/78/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 amending Directives 98/26/EC, 2002/87/EC, 2003/6/EC, 2003/41/EC, 2003/71/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2004/109/EC, 2005/60/EC, 2006/48/EC, 2006/49/EC and 2009/65/EC in respect of the powers of the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), the European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 331 of 15 December 2010
  )

On page 145, Article 9, Amendments to Directive 2006/48/EC, point (6):

for:

| ‘(6) | In Article 22, the following paragraph is added:

  ‘3.   In order to ...’.’, |
| --- | --- |

‘(6)

In Article 22, the following paragraph is added:

‘3.   In order to ...’.’,

read:

| ‘(6) | In Article 22, the following paragraph is added:

  ‘6.   In order to ...’.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘(6)

In Article 22, the following paragraph is added:

‘6.   In order to ...’.’.

---
No. 12-8311.

#### Lara *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-6689.

#### Benavides *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### David Itskovich, Respondent, v Lea Lichenstadter et al., Appellants.

[767 NYS2d 859]—

*407In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated December 11, 2002, which granted the plaintiffs motion to vacate an order of the same court dated November 27, 2001, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), upon the plaintiffs default in opposing the motion.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the order dated November 27, 2001, is reinstated.

A plaintiff attempting to vacate an order granting a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, upon his or her default in opposing the motion, must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action *(see Roussodimou v Zafiriadis,*238 AD2d 568 [1997]). Here, the only competent medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff failed to indicate that his alleged injuries were causally related to the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Verrelli v Tronolone,*230 AD2d 789 [1996]). Accordingly, the plaintiff failed to establish that his claim of serious injury was meritorious, and the Supreme Court should have denied his motion to vacate his default in failing to oppose the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


New York City Watershed, Delaware, Schoharie, Greene, Ulster, and 
Sullivan Counties, New York State

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations 
(40 CFR Part 1500); and the Soil Conservation Service Regulations (7 
CFR Part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture, gives notice that an environmental impact 
statement is not being prepared for the New York City Watershed, 
Delaware, Schoharie, Greene, Ulster, and Sullivan Counties, New York 
State.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard D. Swenson, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 441 S. Salina 
St., Suite 354, Syracuse, New York 13202-2450, telephone 315/477-6504.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental assessment of this 
federally assisted action indicates that the project will not cause 
significant local, regional, or national impacts on the environment. As 
a result of these findings, Richard D. Swenson, State Conservationist, 
has determined that the preparation and review of an environmental 
impact statement are not needed for this project.
    The project purposes are enhance existing programs and to develop 
new ones that will protect the drinking water supply of New York City. 
The planned works of improvement include better forestry practices, 
conservation easements, resource data inventory, technology 
development, education/outreach, and operation and maintenance of whole 
farm plans.
    The Notice of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) has been 
forwarded to the Environmental Protection Agency and to various 
Federal, State, and local agencies and interested parties. A limited 
number of copies of the FONSI are available to fill single copy 
requests at the above address. Basic data developed during the 
environmental assessment are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Richard D. Swenson. No administrative action on implementation of the 
proposal will be taken until 30 days after the date of this publication 
in the Federal Register.

(This activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance under NO. 10.904, Watershed Protection and Flood 
Prevention, and is subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
12372, which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and 
local officials.)
Melvin Womack,
Acting State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. 98-13685 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|North Carolina Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|North Carolina Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3,236  | 3,196  | 3,381 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,802  | 3,506  | 3,119  | 2,664  | 3,401  | 3,652  | 3,973  | 5,375  | 6,228  | 5,672 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,288  | 2,962  | 3,200  | 3,101  | 3,021  | 2,891  | 2,701  | 2,991  | 2,984  | 2,384 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,457  | 2,468  | 2,525  | 2,567  | 2,596  | 2,624  | 2,668  | 2,687  | 2,666  | 2,681 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,691  | 2,672  | 2,681  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,027
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 68,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,120
<INVENTORY>                                   54,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             126,356
<PP&E>                                       127,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                58,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               235,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         89,266
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         479
<OTHER-SE>                                   143,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 235,959
<SALES>                                       94,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              98,646
<CGS>                                         69,368
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 71,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,069
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,069
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .46



</TABLE>