alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|No chart available.                                               
|No chart available.                                               
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Delaware Natural Gas International Deliveries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2010154EN.01000301.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 531/2010

of 18 June 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Csabai kolbász/Csabai vastagkolbász (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Csabai kolbász’ or ‘Csabai vastagkolbász’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Csabai kolbász’ or ‘Csabai vastagkolbász’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 248, 16.10.2009, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

HUNGARY

Csabai kolbász/Csabai vastagkolbász (PGI)

---
354P16

#### Catrina Jarrett v. William Andrew Jarrett

1. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-1346)

2. Defs Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 09/27/2016 Dissolved 10/28/2016

2. Denied 10/28/2016

3. Denied 10/28/2016
2017-0870.

#### Bank of New York Mellon v. Rhiel.

Certified Question of State Law, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the United States Court of Appeals *1428for 6th Circuit, No. 16-8042. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.06. The court will answer the following questions:

“1. Is an individual who is not identified in the body of a mortgage, but who signs and initials the mortgage, a mortgagor of his or her interest?”

“2. Is a mortgage signed and initialed by an individual whose name is not identified in the body of the mortgage, but whose signature is properly acknowledged pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Sec. 6301, invalid as a matter of law such that parol evidence is not admissible to determine the intent of the individual in signing the mortgage?”

Petitioner shall file its merit brief within 40 days and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and S.Ct.Prac.R. 9.07.

O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.
No. 12-5464.

#### Noriega-Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
7-139. Implementation and Enforcement of 

111(d)(2) and 111(d)/(2)/129(b)(3) Federal 

Plans 

1200 TN 484

6/28/99

1. AUTHORITY. To implement and enforce Federal plans promulgated pursuant to 

sections 111(d)(2) or 111(d)(2)/129(b)(3) of the Clean Air Act. 

2. TO WHOM DELEGATED. Regional Administrators. 

3. LIMITATIONS. 

a. For redelegations from Regional Administrators to States or Tribes only: 

Regional Administrators may consider redelegating authority to implement and 

enforce Federal Plans if all of the following are true: 

1. For Tribes, the Tribe has already established its eligibility to be treated in 

the same manner as a State. (Note: This determination is made pursuant to 

40 CFR §§ 49.6 and 49.7). 

2. The State or Tribe does not already have an EPA-approved State or Tribal 

plan. 

3. The State or Tribe has submitted to the appropriate Regional 

Administrator a written request for the redelegation and has demonstrated 

that it has satisfied EPA's criteria for redelegation including, at a 

minimum, a demonstration of adequate resources and legal and 

enforcement authority to administer and enforce the Federal plan at issue. 

4. The State or Tribe has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) 

with the Regional Administrator that sets forth the terms, conditions and 

effective date of the redelegation, and that serves as the mechanism for the 

transfer of authority. The MOA shall include a provision acknowledging 

that the Regional Administrator has the authority to revoke all or part of 

the redelegation if the Regional Administrator determines that a State or 

Tribe has failed to properly implement or enforce the Federal plan. Upon 

signature of the MOA, the Regional Administrator must publish a notice 

in the Federal Register that notifies all interested parties of the 

redelegation and incorporates the redelegation into 40 CFR Part 62.

b. Regional Administrators will continue to retain enforcement authority along with 

a State or Tribe after redelegation to a State or Tribe of authority to implement 

and enforce the Federal plan. 

c. Regional Administrators and/or the Office of Air and Radiation will continue to 

retain any other specific authorities reserved to EPA in individual Federal plans.

4. REDELEGATION AUTHORITY.

a. The authority to implement and enforce Federal plans may be redelegated to 

States and/or Tribes in accordance with the terms under the Limitations section. 

This redelegation authority is reserved for the Regional Administrators only. 
b. Within the Region, the authority to implement and enforce the Federal Plan may

be redelegated to the Regional Air Division Director, or equivalent, and may not 

be redelegated further.

5. ADDITIONAL REFERENCES.

a. Section 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(a), as amended by the 

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399. 

b. Section 301(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d), as amended by the 

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399. 

c. 40 CFR §§ 49.6 and 49.7. 

d. 40 CFR § 60.27.
No. 12-6634.

#### Samuel *v.*Terrell, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Miami, Inc., 8211 NW 68 Street, Miami, FL 33166, Officer; Javier 
Palenque, President
Reliance Shipping Group, L.L.C., Rt. 5 Box 1018, 5353 I 35, Red Oak, TX 
75154, Officers: Don McNally, Managing Member, Gary Childs, Managing 
Member
Razo Logistics and Documentation Services, 1006 Beckman, Houston, TX 
77076, Gloria S. Razo, Sole Proprietor

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13348 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
# L_2010068EN.01001101.xml

| 18.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 227/2010

of 17 March 2010

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2010 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of March 2010 for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2010 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2010 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 March 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 March 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.4.2010-30.6.2010
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,450752 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,502897 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,654346 |
| 5 | 09.4421 | 6,711447 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,729936 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.4.2010-30.6.2010

(%)

1

09.4410

0,450752

3

09.4412

0,502897

4

09.4420

0,654346

5

09.4421

6,711447

6

09.4422

0,729936

---
Amendment to Stock Option Agreements



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 
 2002 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 Optionee: Anthony M. Abate (“Optionee”) 
 Date of
Amendment: May 12, 2006 
 Date of Existing Stock Option Agreements to be Amended: June 23, 2004, November 23, 2004 (as amended to
date (the “Existing Option Agreements”)) 
 1. Existing Option Agreements. This is an amendment (the
“Amendment”) to the Existing Stock Option Agreements listed above between Optionee and Cbeyond Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). Optionee currently holds the options (the
“Company Options”) to purchase shares of common stock of the Company listed above pursuant to the Existing Option Agreements granted under the Cbeyond Communications, Inc. 2002 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”). For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Optionee agree to this Amendment. Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meanings given to such terms in the Plan or the Existing Option Agreements. 
 2. Vesting. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in the Existing Option Agreements, all of the Company Options shall vest and become fully exercisable on June 23, 2006. 
 3.
Post-Termination Exercise Period. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Existing Option Agreements, all of the Company Options shall remain exercisable until December 31, 2006. 
 4. No Further Amendments. Except as specifically set forth above, all of the remaining terms of the Existing Option Agreements shall remain
unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 5. Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be delivered via facsimile and may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall be constitute document. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with California law without regard to the conflict of laws provisions
thereof. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first
written above. 
  

			
	 CBEYOND COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ J. Robert Fugate

		
	 Print Name:
	 	 J. Robert Fugate

		
	 Title:
	 	 Chief Financial Officer

		
	 OPTIONEE
	 	
	  
 /s/ Anthony M.
Abate

	 Print Name:
	 	 Anthony M. Abate
1

Subject: FW: RE. Supplemental material for 2008 OEM paper

Attachments: Table_Environmental_var_chf_panel_study.docx

From: Marie-France Valois, Miss [mailto:marie-france.valois@mcgill.ca] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 10:15 AM 

To: Luben, Tom 

Subject: RE. Supplemental material for 2008 OEM paper 

Hello Dr. Luben, 

I work with Dr. Goldberg and I am responding to your request of distributions of the environmental variables 

in our CHF panel study. You can find these in the attached Word file. 

I hope this is what you need. If not, please let me know and I will try to help. 

Have a nice day, 

Marie-France Valois 
Distribution of Environmental Variables During the Study Period, 2002-2003*

Variable Mean Median Minimum Maximum

Interquartile 

range

Percent 

missing 

data

Daily maximum 

temperature (°C) 12.9 13.9 -19.5 35.4 22.7 0.0

Mean relative humidity 

(%) 68.1 68.0 34.0 99.0 18.0 0.0

Change in pressure 

from previous day 

(kPa)

0.0013 0.02 -3.6 3.1 1.1 0.0

CO (μg/m3) 4.3 4.0 1.3 13.5 1.8 0.0

NO2 (μg/m3) 33.6 31.0 13.0 101.8 16.0 0.0

O3 (μg/m3) 38.5 34.8 2.7 136.6 23.7 0.0

SO2 (μg/m3) 11.8 10.0 1.6 65.7 8.6 0.0

PM2.5 (μg/m3) 9.5 7.0 0.8 50.2 7.3 0.0

* From 1,755 observations on 31 subjects.
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Damico, Genevieve Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:16 AM To: Ogulei, David; Caudill, Motria; Woolums, Jane; Morg an, Andrea Cc: Mooney, John Subject: Call with Doug Harris on 2/17

Doug Harris called me yesterday afternoon. His gro up spoke after our meeting last Wednesday. He outl ined Veolia’s preferred approach. Are people available before ou r 11:00 to chat about this and what we would like t o recommend to management?

1. Veolia is fine getting two filter based monitoring and running them on the fenceline with appropriate met stations. 2. When asked if they are no longer considering the th ird party approach using the continuous monitors, D oug said they haven’t ruled it out but 3. They will collect the filters daily and analyze for the six metals. 4. They would prefer to analyze the filters at their o nsite lab but they are willing to contract that out

. 5. They are very leary of posting the information on V eolia’s website but they are willing to add it to t he contract for the lab that the lab would post the information

. 6. They are only interested in doing one year of monit oring. It would be butting up against being a deal breaker to go any longer. 7. EPA must also agree not to use Veolia’s data to enf orce against Veolia’s neighbors. Veolia would expe ct that if we see something in their data that we bring out ow n equipment down and take our own measurements.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan    | Feb    | Mar   | Apr   | May   | Jun | Jul   | Aug   | Sep   | Oct    | Nov   | Dec   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------
|2022                                                                                                                              |        |        |       |       | 3,665 |     | 3,727 | 3,372 | 3,468 | 3,675  | 3,685 | 3,480 
|2023                                                                                                                              | 7,011  | 10,660 | 6,950 | 3,577 | 3,685 |     | 7,121 | 7,825 |       | 10,785 | 7,276 | 12,453
|2024                                                                                                                              | 14,005 | 7,119  | 1,969 | 7,258 |       |     |       |       |       |        |       |       
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of United Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) that:
  
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  August 9, 2010
 
 
 By:
/s/ Anthony J. MiceliAnthony J. MiceliChief Financial Officer
No. 12-8018.

#### Wilson *v.*United States Air Force.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:**

(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: March 12, 2007 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER    
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                     |  | Dennis J. Stevermer        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer