alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.99   | 5.84  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Robert N. Taub, Respondent, v Columbia University in the City of New York et al., Appellants.

[52 NYS3d 10]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered July 26, 2016, which, among other things, granted the petition to the extent of remanding the matter to respondents (Columbia) for completion of the multistep process, delineated in the Faculty Handbook and in the University Statutes, for terminating professors with tenure and tenure of title; enjoined Columbia from, among other things, removing petitioner from his position and job duties, and ending his salary until the completion of the multistep process; and denied Columbia’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, the injunction vacated, and Columbia’s cross motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the proceeding. Amended order, same court and Justice, entered December 7, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted petitioner’s motion to expand the injunctive relief provided in the order entered July 26, 2016, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the injunction vacated.

The record establishes that Columbia had a rational basis for preserving petitioner’s title, but removing his job duties, *414salary, laboratory space, and administrative support, without a hearing *(see*CPLR 7803 [3]; *see also O’Neill v New York Univ.,*97 AD3d 199, 213 [1st Dept 2012]). The controlling Faculty Handbook makes clear that faculty possessing tenure of title, as petitioner did, are not entitled to a hearing unless their title itself is eliminated, which did not happen here. Given the foregoing, there is no basis for an injunction.

Petitioner improperly raised a breach of contract claim in this article 78 proceeding *(see Maas v Cornell Univ.,*94 NY2d 87, 92 [1999]; *see also Keles v Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y.,*74 AD3d 435, 435-436 [1st Dept 2010], *lv dismissed*16 NY3d 890 [2011], *cert denied*565 US 884 [2011]), and there is no basis to convert the article 78 petition into a hybrid petition and complaint. The Faculty Handbook explicitly states that it is not a contract *(see Gomariz v Foote, Cone & Belding Communications,*228 AD2d 316, 317 [1st Dept 1996]), and petitioner did not allege that any other contract had been breached. Petitioner improperly argues for the first time on appeal that Columbia breached his original appointment letter, and, in any event, the argument is unavailing.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
No. 12-951.

#### Laney *v.*Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1901 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1901

     To require the Secretary of Agriculture to issue regulations 
  authorizing the purchase and eradication of swine infected with or 
            exposed to brucellosis, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 8 (legislative day, February 22), 1994

  Mr. Helms (for himself, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Faircloth, and Mr. Grassley) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of Agriculture to issue regulations 
  authorizing the purchase and eradication of swine infected with or 
            exposed to brucellosis, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PURCHASE AND ERADICATION OF SWINE INFECTED WITH BRUCELLOSIS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall issue regulations that 
authorize the Secretary to purchase and eradicate swine infected with 
or exposed to brucellosis in accordance with section 11 of the Act of 
May 29, 1884 (21 U.S.C. 114a).
    (b) Implementation.--Section 102 of Public Law 99-198 shall apply 
to the issuance of regulations under subsection (a).

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 050898B]


Marine Mammals

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Marine Mammal 
Laboratory, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point 
Way, NE, BIN C15700, Building 1, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, has been 
issued a permit to take large and small cetaceans and incidentally 
harass some pinniped species during aerial surveys for purposes of 
scientific research.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/
713-2289);
    Regional Administrator, Northwest Region, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, BIN C15700, Building 1, 
Seattle, WA 98115-0070; and
    Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, NOAA, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 
90802-4213.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Johnson or Sara Shapiro, 301/713-
2289.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 15, 1998, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (63 FR 2366) that a request for a scientific 
research permit to take multiple cetacean and pinniped species had been 
submitted by the above-named individual. The requested permit has been 
issued under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, 
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the Regulations Governing the 
Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), the regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting 
of endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR parts 217-227), and the Fur 
Seal Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151 et seq.).
    Issuance of this permit, as required by the ESA, was based on a 
finding that such permit (1) was applied for in good faith, (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit, and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: May 8, 1998.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-13048 Filed 5-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
EXHIBIT
      13.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Highway Holdings Limited (the "Company")
      on
      Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roland Kohl, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Dated:
      June 29, 2006











/s/
      Roland W. Kohl


-----------------------


Roland
      W.
      Kohl


Chief
      Executive Officer
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Singapore (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Singapore (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | W    |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |      |     | W   |     |     | W   |     |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 6.29 |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EARNINGS PER SHARE

     Diluted earnings per share have been calculated using the treasury stock
method to account for the 696,575 employee stock options outstanding at
December 31, 2002. The discount rates have been estimated at the respective
dates of grants as the interest rate the company would pay to borrow the
corresponding amount over the corresponding period. See also Note 23 "Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP) - Diluted
Earnings Per Share" of Notes to Financial Statements.

Swedish GAAP

     To calculate diluted earnings per share according to Swedish GAAP, assumed
proceeds from exercise of stock options are discounted to present value. The
following table presents the calculation of the total diluted No. of shares.

Source of shares                          No. of shares

Ordinary shares outstanding                   9,750,000
Option plan 2000/2010                            96,152
Option plan 2001/2006                                 -
Option plan 2001/2011                             1,748
Option plan 2002/2007                             3,109
Total diluted No. of shares, before rounding  9,851,009
Total diluted No. of shares, thousands            9,851

     Net income during 2002 was SEK 80,760 thousand according to Swedish GAAP.
Thus, diluted earnings per share were SEK 8.20 according to Swedish GAAP.

U.S. GAAP

     Diluted earnings per share according to U.S. GAAP have been calculated
according to SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share." Under U.S. GAAP, the assumed
proceeds from exercise of options are not discounted to present value. The
following table presents the calculation of the total diluted No. of shares.

Source of shares                          No. of shares

Ordinary shares outstanding                   9,750,000
Option plan 2000/2010                                 -
Option plan 2001/2006                                 -
Option plan 2001/2011                                 -
Option plan 2002/2007                                 -
Total diluted No. of shares, before rounding  9,750,000
Total diluted No. of shares, thousands            9,750

     Net income during 2002 according to U.S. GAAP was SEK 74,644 thousand.
Thus, diluted earnings per share were SEK 7.66 according to U.S. GAAP.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|No chart available.                                                           
|No chart available.                                                           
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|South Dakota Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1769

AN ACT

To make a technical amendment, and for other

purposes.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1769

AN ACT

To make a technical amendment, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CDBG TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the city

5 of Slidell, Louisiana may submit, not later than 10 days

6 after the enactment of this Act, and the Secretary of

7 Housing and Urban Development shall consider and ac8 cept, the final statement of community development objec9 tives and projected use of funds required by section

10 104(a)(1) of the Housing and Community Development

11 Act of 1974 in connection with a grant to the city of Sli12 dell under title 1 of such Act for fiscal year 1994.
2

S 1769 ES

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF CDBG PUBLIC SERVICES CAP.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105(a)(8) of the Housing

3 and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.

4 5305(a)(8)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ after the penultimate

6 comma; and

7 (2) by inserting before the semicolon at the end

8 the following: ‘‘, and except that of any amount of

9 assistance under this title (including program in10 come) in fiscal year 1994 to the City of Pittsburgh,

11 Pennsylvania, such city may use not more than 20

12 percent in each such fiscal year for activities under

13 this paragraph’’.

14 SEC. 3. CONVERSION PROJECTS.

15 (a) SECTION 23 CONVERSION.—

16 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—Notwithstanding con17 tracts entered into pursuant to section 14(b)(2) of

18 the United States Housing Act of 1937, the Sec19 retary is authorized to enter into obligations for con20 version of Leonard Terrace Apartments in Grand

21 Rapids, Michigan, from a leased housing contract

22 under section 23 of such Act to a project-based rent23 al assistance contract under section 8 of such Act.

24 (2) REPAYMENT REQUIRED.—The authorization

25 made in paragraph (1) is conditioned on the repay26 ment to the Secretary of all amounts received by the
3

S 1769 ES

1 public housing agency under the comprehensive im2 provement assistance program under section 14 of

3 the United States Housing Act of 1937 for the

4 Leonard Terrace Apartment project and the

5 amounts, as determined by the Secretary, received

6 by the public housing agency under the formula in

7 section 14(k) of such Act by reason of the project.

8 SEC. 4. FIRE SAFETY IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED HOUSING.

9 Section 31(c)(2)(A)(i) of the Federal Fire Prevention

10 and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2227(c)(2)(A)(i)) is

11 amended by adding ‘‘(or equivalent level of safety)’’ after

12 ‘‘system’’.

Passed the Senate November 22, 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
# C_2010053EN.01000101.xml

| 3.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5780 — Allianz/ING/Allee Center)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 53/01

On 17 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5780. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5780. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
No. 12-8612.

#### Hernandez-Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.