alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Donn Gerelli Associates Insurance Agency, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Benjamin M. Lawsky, Respondent.

[52 NYS3d 862]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered July 7, 2016, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denying the petition to annul a determination of the Superintendent of Financial Services of the New York State Department of Financial Services, dated June 1, 2015, which found that petitioners violated Insurance Law §§ 2119 and 2110 (a) (4), and ordered petitioners’ licenses revoked unless they paid restitution in the aggregate amount of $6,434.25 and a civil penalty of $69,600, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Superintendent’s initial warning letter to petitioners, addressing their admitted statutory violations but declining enforcement at that time, which stated that the letter did not “constitute a formal administrative action,” did not preclude respondent from subsequently charging petitioners with those violations and others following further investigation. The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel are inapplicable to this proceeding, and petitioners’ other theories in this regard are likewise unavailing *(see Matter of Venes v Community School Bd. of Dist. 26,*43 NY2d 520, 525 [1978]). It is “the settled policy of the courts not to review the exercise of discretion by public officials in the enforcement of State statutes, in the absence of a clear violation of some constitutional mandate” *(Matter of Rivergate Co. v Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N.Y.,*144 AD2d 266, 266 [1st Dept 1988], *lv denied*74 NY2d 605 [1989] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Petitioners’ contentions that the determination was barred under 19 NYCRR 400.13 (a) and the doctrine of laches are without merit. The timeliness requirements of 19 NYCRR *425400.13 (a) are applicable only to proceedings “under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of State.” “[T]he equitable doctrine of laches may not be interposed as a defense against the State when acting in a governmental capacity to enforce a public right or protect a public interest” *(Matter of Cortlandt Nursing Home v Axelrod,*66 NY2d 169, 177 n 2 [1985], *cert denied*476 US 1115 [1986]).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Mazzarelli, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Kapnick, JJ.
# L_2010343DE.01007901.xml

| 29.12.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 343/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 343/79

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 709/2010 der Kommission vom 22. Juli 2010 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 338/97 des Rates über den Schutz von Exemplaren wildlebender Tier- und Pflanzenarten durch Überwachung des Handels

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 12. August 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 12. August 2010

Seite 7, Anhang, Rubrik „Camelidae“, Spalte „Anhang B“

Statt:

„Lama glama guanicoe (II)“

Lama glama guanicoe

muss es heißen:

„Lama guanicoe (II)“

Lama guanicoe

Seite 50, Anhang, Rubrik „ORCHIDACEAE“, Spalte „Anhang A“

Statt:

„Für folgende Arten des Anhangs A gilt diese Verordnung nicht: Sämlinge oder Gewebekulturen, welche in-vitro erworben werden, in festem oder flüssigem Medium, die in sterilen Behältern befördert werden, es sei denn, die Exemplare entsprechen der Begriffsbestimmung von ‚künstlich vermehrt‘ in Artikel 56 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 865/2006“

muss es heißen:

„Diese Verordnung gilt für die folgenden Arten des Anhangs A nicht, sofern es sich um Sämlings- oder Gewebekulturen handelt, welche in-vitro in festem oder flüssigem Medium gewonnen und in sterilen Behältern befördert werden, jedoch nur unter der Voraussetzung, dass die Exemplare der Begriffsbestimmung von ‚künstlich vermehrt‘ in Artikel 56 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 865/2006 entsprechen“

---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1683

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds to the Palisades

Interstate Park Commission for acquisition of land in the Sterling Forest

area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BRADLEY (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide funds

to the Palisades Interstate Park Commission for acquisition of land in the Sterling Forest area of the New

York/New Jersey Highlands Region, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sterling Forest and

5 New Jersey Watershed Protection Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1683 IS

1 SEC. 2. LAND ACQUISITION.

2 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Palisades Park Commis3 sion (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’) is au4 thorized to acquire from the Sterling Forest Corporation

5 an open space tract of land comprising the Sterling Forest

6 area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region.

7 (b) MANAGEMENT.—The Commission shall manage

8 the land acquired pursuant to subsection (a) to enhance

9 protection of watershed, outdoor recreational, wildlife

10 habitat, and Appalachian Trail values in the Sterling For11 est area of the New York/New Jersey Highlands Region.

12 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro14 priated to the Secretary of the Interior $35,000,000 for

15 the purposes of acquiring the land described in section 2.

16 (b) TRANSFER OF FUNDS.—Of the sums made avail17 able pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of the Inte18 rior shall transfer to the Commission such sums as are

19 necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       135
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,513
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2017-0913.

#### Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Dept. of Edn.

Franklin App. No. 16AP-863, 2017-Ohio-5607. Discretionary appeal of appellant Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow accepted on proposition of law No. IV. Appeal of appellants Jeremy Aker and Darrel Deberry not accepted.

O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., would accept the appeal of appellant Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow on all propositions of law.

O’Connor, C.J., dissents and would not accept either appeal.

W. Scott Gwin, J., of the Fifth District Court of Appeals, sitting for French, J.
No. 12-7835.

#### Hilliard *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7699.

#### Jimenez *v.*Clark.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8249.

#### Noel *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Genesis Merchant Partners, LP, et al., Appellants, v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane LLC et al., Respondents.

[49 NYS3d 886]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered on or about June 23, 2015, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, upon defendants’ motion to dismiss, dismissed plaintiffs’ breach of fiduciary duty cause of action as duplicative of their legal malpractice cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants’ alleged failure to disclose their legal malpractice does not give rise to a separate action for breach of fiduciary duty *(Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP,*82 AD3d 435, 436 [1st Dept 2011]). Plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged defendants’ overbilling to support a separate cause of action *(cf. Cherry Hill Mkt. Corp. v Cozen O’Connor P.C.,*118 AD3d 514, 514 [1st Dept 2014] [breach of fiduciary duty claim was not duplicative where, among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that the defendants had overbilled the plaintiffs]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Moskow-itz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12774]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Advisory Committee to the Director, NIH, June 4, 1998, 
Conference Room 10, Building 31, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 
adjournment. The topics proposed for discussion include: (1) Enhancing 
Diversity in Biomedical Research at NIH; (2) Bioengineering Conference: 
(3) Report from the Working Group on Research Tools; (4) Bioethics; and 
(5) DHHS Report on Research Misconduct. Attendance by the public will 
be limited to space available.
    Ms. Janice Ramsden, Special Assistant to the Deputy Director, 
National Institutes of Health, 1 Center Drive MSC 0159, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892-0159, telephone (301) 496-0959, fax (301) 496-7451, will 
furnish the meeting agenda, roster of committee members, and available 
substantive program information upon request. Any individual who 
requires special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Ramsden no later 
than May 29, 1998.

    Dated: May 6, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12774 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Avista Corporation Performance and Restricted Shares Grant Table



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Avista Corporation 
 Performance and Restricted Shares Grant Table 
  

					
	 Name and Principal Position
	  	Performance Shares	  	Restricted Shares
	 Scott L. Morris
 President and Chief Operating Officer (1)
	  	4,000	  	1,000
			
	 Malyn K. Malquist
 Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer (2)
	  	1,700	  	500

  

	(1)	Named president and chief operating officer on May 12, 2006. Previously senior vice president of Avista Corporation and president of Avista Utilities. 


 

	(2)	Named executive vice president and chief financial officer on May 12, 2006. Previously senior vice president and chief financial officer of Avista Corporation.


 The table above shows information regarding performance shares and restricted shares granted to Scott L. Morris and Malyn K. Malquist under
the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan as approved by the Board of Directors on May 12, 2006. In February 2006, Mr. Morris and Mr. Malquist each received grants of 11,500 performance shares and 3,000 restricted
shares. As such, Mr. Morris has received a total grant of 15,500 performance shares and 4,000 restricted shares for the 2006-2008 cycle. Mr. Malquist has received a total of 13,200 performance shares and 3,500 restricted shares for the
2006-2008 cycle. 
 The performance share awards will be issued only if the Company achieves certain relative shareholder return targets when measured
against the S&P 400 MidCap Utilities Index over a three-year period ending December 31, 2008. The amount of the payment with respect to any award is determined at the end of the three-year performance cycle based on the Company’s final
average percentile ranking relative to the S&P 400 MidCap Utilities Index and is payable at the Company’s option in either cash or Company common stock, or both. The number of performance shares paid to executive officers at the end of the
three-year cycle will range from 0 to 150 percent of the grant. No performance shares will be paid unless the Company achieves at least the 45th percentile ranking in relative shareholder return when measured against the S&P 400 MidCap Utilities
Index over the performance period. To receive 100 percent of the award, the Company must rank at the 55th percentile among the S&P 400 MidCap Utilities Index. To receive the maximum of 150 percent of the award, the Company must perform at or
above the 85th percentile ranking. The Company uses a sliding-scale approach to indicate the percentage of potential award for varying levels of performance above and below the targeted level. Individual awards are based on actual results using a
sliding scale between threshold (45th percentile), target (55th percentile), and exceeds (85th percentile) levels. Dividend Equivalent Rights are calculated and paid out in cash when and to the extent the performance shares are paid. 
 Restricted shares vest in equal thirds each year over a three-year period and are payable in Avista Corp. common stock at the end of each year in the three-year period
if the service condition is met.
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb   | Mar   | Apr   | May | Jun   | Jul | Aug | Sep   | Oct   | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              | 3,471 | 3,413 | 3,724 | 3,324 |     |       |     |     |       |       | 3,633 |    
|2021                                                                                                                              |       |       | 3,484 |       |     |       |     |     |       |       |       |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |       | 4,397 | 3,551 |       |     |       |     |     |       |       |       |    
|2023                                                                                                                              | 3,640 |       | 389   |       |     | 3,664 |     |     | 3,545 | 3,722 | 3,624 |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Elaine Gaines, Appellant, v James J. Gaines, Respondent.

[630 NYS2d 941]

—In an action, *inter alia,*for equitable distribution of marital property after the entry of a judgment of divorce, the former wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.), dated September 8, 1993, which denied her motion to modify the parties’ stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*684The Supreme Court properly denied the former wife’s motion to set aside the parties’ stipulation of settlement. The wife, having accepted substantial benefits under the agreement, is deemed to have ratified the agreement and is precluded from attempting to set it aside *(see, Beutel v Beutel,*55 NY2d 957; *Akgul v Akgul,*175 AD2d 194; *Greenfield v Greenfield,*147 AD2d 440; *Cordero v Cordero,*135 AD2d 483). Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1750

CHONG SU YI,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CONGRESS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. 

(8:16-cv-00819-TDC)

Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chong Su Yi, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States 

Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Chong Su Yi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing 

his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) and denying 

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the district 

court’s dismissal to show that it is without prejudice and 

affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Yi v. Congress, No. 8:16-cv-00819-TDC (D. Md. Apr. 22 & May 31, 

2016); see also Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 258 (4th Cir. 

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains first quarter summary financial information extracted
from Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal 1998 first quarter Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,823
<INVENTORY>                                     80,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,859
<PP&E>                                         721,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                 311,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 869,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,000
<BONDS>                                         14,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   869,145
<SALES>                                        110,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,140
<CGS>                                           87,745
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,297
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         134,799
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  241,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               396,562
<PP&E>                                         10,393,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,072,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,717,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          140,844
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       811,644
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,564,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,717,062
<SALES>                                        1,165,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,172,448
<CGS>                                          418,678
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  418,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               551,133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             81,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                202,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            202,637
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   202,637
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .12


</TABLE>