alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5922 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5922

**Commission Decision of 03/09/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5922 - POSCO / DAEWOO INTERNATIONAL) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 3.9.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/13636

C(2010) 6193

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5922 - POSCO/ DAEWOO INTERNATIONAL Notification of 02.08.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 222, 17.08.2010, p.8

1. On 09.08.2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] by which the undertaking POSCO ("POSCO", Republic of Korea) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of the undertaking Daewoo International Corporation (“Daewoo International”, Republic of Korea).

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking POSCO: manufacturing and sale of steel products;

- for undertaking Daewoo International: trade in a wide range of products including steel products and steel semi-finished products, industrial machinery, automotive components, electric industry products, textiles, defence supplies, iron ore, iron scrap, non-ferrous metals, chemicals, agricultural, and livestock products.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "Merger Regulation")

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1721 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1721

To provide for the transfer of certain tuna fishing vessels documented 
               in the United States to foreign registry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the transfer of certain tuna fishing vessels documented 
               in the United States to foreign registry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF REGISTRY FOR CERTAIN FISHING VESSELS.

    (a) In General.--The transfer of registry of a tuna fishing vessel 
which is an agreement vessel documented under the laws of the United 
States to foreign registry shall not be treated, for purposes of the 
Merchant Marine Act, 1936, or any other law of the United States, as--
            (1) a disposition vessel, or
            (2) a failure to meet any substantial obligation under an 
        agreement entered into between the owner or operator of the 
        vessel and the Secretary,
if the vessel continues to be owned, directly or indirectly, by a 
United States person and to be operated in compliance with section 307 
of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1417).
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
            (1) any term defined in section 607(k) of the Merchant 
        Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 1177(k)) that is used in this 
        section shall have the meaning given that term in that section; 
        and
            (2) the term ``United States person'' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 7701(a)(30) of the Internal Revenue Code 
        of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(30)).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to any transfer of 
registry effected before January 1, 1996.

                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEITH WAYNE CANTRILL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3318

[ June 16, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kirk Volker , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2019

- CF

- 001759

- AXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , G ERBER and L EVINE , JJ ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 12-616.

#### Jar Chen Wang *v.*Plasmart, Inc.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                        
|No chart available.                                                        
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Tennessee Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7601.

#### Wilkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 12

- 00684

- CV
IN RE THE WILLA PE TERS HUBBERD TESTAMENTARY TRUST
From the Probate Court No

. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1986

- PC

- 1440 Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 26, 2013
ABATED AND REMANDED The parties have filed a joint motion, stating that they have fully resolved and settled all issues in dispute. Noting that we have questioned whether the trial court’s order is a final, appealable order, the parties have requested that we abate this appea l , thereby imbuing the trial court with whatever jurisdiction we may have, and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of judgment in conformity with their settlement agreement. We grant the motion, abate this appeal, and remand the cause to the t rial court for entry of judgment in conformity with the settlement agreement. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant s
. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
Exhibit32.1



CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANTTO18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the accompanyingQuarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Mineral MountainMining & Milling Company
for the quarter ended March31, 2018, I certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuantto
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, tomy knowledge, that:



(1)  
the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of MineralMountain Mining & MillingCompany for the fiscalquarter ended March31, 2018, fully complies withthe requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities ExchangeActof 1934; and



(2) 
the information contained in the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2018, fairly presents inall material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations
of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling
Company.



|By:    | /s/ Sheldon Karasik                              | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|Name:  | Sheldon Karasik                                 
|Title: | Chairman ofthe Board/Chief
    Executive Officer
|Date:  | May 18,
    2018                                



A
signed original of this written
statement required by Section
906,or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typedform within the electronicversion of this written statementrequired by Section 906,has been provided to Mineral Mountain
Mining & Milling Company and willbe retained by Mineral Mountain
Mining & Milling Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2019, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2019, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2019, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company.





|*/s/ Pat Dileo*                                                                                                           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 



Dated: May 20, 2019



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company and will be retained by Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Oc;t(}ber

-21,2014 Memorandum Subject:
From:

To: October 22, 2014Teleconference Between the National Tribal Air Association (NTAA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Chris Stoneman, Policy Advisor 

# cL

**~** Outreach and Information Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 This memorandum to docket provides a briefsummaryofthe main discussion points made at the subject meeting duringthe comment period for the proposed rule: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source Review Program in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014) Teleconference details: When: October 22, 2014; 2:00- 3:00pm ET Participants: Laura McKelvey, EPA, OAQPS Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS Toni Colon, EPA, OAQPS Lisa Beckham, EPA, Region 9 Kevin Greenleaf, Kootenai Tribe ofIdaho BrandyToft, Leech Lake Band ofOjibwe Bill Thompson, Penobscot Indian Nation Wilfred Nabahe, Colorado River Indian Tribes Andy Bessler, NTAA To startthe teleconference, EPA provided an overview ofthe EPA effort underway to issue general permits/permits byrule for true minor sources in Indian country, includingthe latest Bundle #2 proposal. Followingthe general overview, EPA went through in detail the proposed general permits for engines (spark ignition and compression ignition) and boilers. The EPA explained the purpose ofeach permit and the rationale for the permits' requirements. This memorandum will be filed in the docketfor the proposed rule and will be available for public review
. 

# ..
No. 12-6724.

#### Mohammed *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certio-rari denied.
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT





This Amendment No. 4 to Executive
Employment Agreement by and between deltathree, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Inc.”) and Delta Three Israel, Ltd.,
an Israeli corporation (“Ltd.”, and together with Inc., the “Company”), on the one hand, and Effi Baruch,
an individual (“Executive”) on the other hand, dated as of December 9, 2008 (the “Executive Employment Agreement”),
as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 17, 2009 (“Amendment No. 1”), that certain Amendment
No. 2, dated as of October 20, 2009 (“Amendment No. 2”), and that certain Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 27,
2010 (“Amendment No. 3”, and together with the Executive Employment Agreement, Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2,
the “Agreement”), is dated as of August 17, 2011.


Recitals:


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
entered into the Executive Employment Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3, and now wish
to enter into this Amendment No. 3 to Executive Employment Agreement (“Amendment No. 4”) to further amend the Agreement
as set forth below;


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto,
intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


1.The first sentence of Section 3(a)
of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“During the Employment Period,
the Company shall pay Executive a base salary at the annual rate of U.S.$180,735.60 ($15,061.30 per month, or the pro rata portion
thereof), payable in accordance with the Company’s customary payroll practices (the “Base Salary”).”


2.The foregoing amendment to the
Agreement shall be effective commencing as of August 1, 2011.


3.Except as expressly provided in
this Amendment No. 4, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged, and the terms and conditions of the Agreement
as amended hereby remain in full force and effect.



     

     

    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 4 as of the date first set forth above.





	 	DELTATHREE, INC. 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert Stevanovski	 
	 	 	Name: Robert Stevanovski	 
	 	 	Title:   Chairman of the Board	 









	 	DELTA THREE ISRAEL, LTD. 	 
	 	By: deltathree, Inc., its sole director 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Robert Stevanovski	 
	 	 	Name: Robert Stevanovski	 
	 	 	Title:   Chairman of the Board	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Effi Baruch 	 
	 	 	Effi Baruch  	 









 






    	2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000065195
<NAME>                        Mestek, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,384
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 61,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,122
<INVENTORY>                                   57,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             122,715
<PP&E>                                       125,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                56,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               230,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         86,274
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         479
<OTHER-SE>                                   139,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 230,026
<SALES>                                       84,508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              89,533
<CGS>                                         60,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 63,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,784
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,179
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,605
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,605
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .41



</TABLE>
No. 12-779.

#### Ryan *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Energy Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




Signed
      on this 1stday of
      April, 2008


/s/
              Arie
              SilverbergArie
                Silverberg
              Chief
                Executive Officer


/s/
              Marios PantazopoulosMarios
                Pantazopoulos
              Chief
                  Financial Officer
No. 12-6092.

#### Clawson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2010094EN.01001201.xml

| 14.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5800 — Bridgepoint/Care UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 94/07

On 7 April 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5800. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5800. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---