alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                              9,710
<SECURITIES>                       37,555
<RECEIVABLES>                     172,624
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       126,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  361,026
<PP&E>                            416,395
<DEPRECIATION>                    197,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    769,816
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             348,333
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                           56,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                         47,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      769,816
<SALES>                           178,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  178,839
<CGS>                              80,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      80,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  187,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  6,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (92,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                        5,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (97,762)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (97,762)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (2.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.25)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-23375 and
333-23379) of our reports dated March 11, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Getty
Petroleum Marketing Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 1999 and 1998 and
for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 1999 which reports
have been included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 11, 1999
UNITED STATES
                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           WASHINGTON, DC  20549

                              FORM 10-QSB

[ X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
Or
[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______  to _______

                 Commission file number 1-8187

           MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

          IDAHO	                            82-0144710
(State or other jurisdiction of             (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)         Identification Number)

                   410 Sherman Avenue   Suite 207
                         Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
               (Address of principal executive offices)

                             83814-2862
                             (Zip Code)

                            (208) 664-3544
           (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  X	No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock as of June 30, 2004:  3,162,531 shares of 5
cent par value per share.

Transitional small business disclosure format (check one):
   Yes( )	No(x)
<PAGE>









MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY
Form 10-QSB
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004


PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Registrant falls within the provisions of Rule 13a-13(c)(2) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as an exploration stage
mining company not in the production stage and claims exemption there
under from the requirement to file Part I.


PART II    OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
		NONE.

ITEM 2	CHANGES IN SECURITIES
		NONE.

ITEM 3	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
		NONE.

ITEM 4	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
		NONE.

ITEM 5	OTHER INFORMATION
		NONE.

ITEM 6	EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            Exhibit 31  Rule 13a-14a and 15d-14a Certification
		Exhibit 32  Section 1350 Certification

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company
(Registrant)

Dated: August 13, 2004

By  /S/ Delaine H. Gruber
Delaine Hess Gruber, President
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Italy (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Italy (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.26   | W      | 10.53  | 5.98   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-218-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

May 19, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 15, 1998, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, to be effective June 15, 1998.
    CIG states that the purpose of this filing is to implement Rate 
Schedule PAL-1 to create a new, flexible parking and lending service 
for shippers. Accordingly, this filing includes revised Tariff sheets 
for the proposed new service.
    CIG states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
affected customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations, All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13829 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### David Eagle, Appellant, v Emigrant Savings Bank, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 124]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered February 3, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims for breach of contract and unjust enrichment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks to enforce an employment offer letter providing that he was eligible for participation in defendant’s carried interest compensation plan at a rate to be determined in defendant’s sole discretion. However, the subject language in the offer letter lacks the requisite definiteness to be enforceable, since it provides neither the level of plaintiff’s participation in the plan, nor a methodology or extrinsic standard for determining it *(see Matter of 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v 151 E. Post Rd. Corp.,*78 NY2d 88, 91-92 [1991]; *Benham v eCommission Solutions, LLC,*118 AD3d 605, 606-607 [1st Dept 2014]; *Magnum Real Estate Servs., Inc. v 133-134-135 Assoc., LLC,*103 AD3d 453 [1st Dept 2013]; *compare Tonkery v Martina,*78 NY2d 893 [1991]).

Based on the terms of both the language of the offer letter and of the carried interest compensation plan itself, it is entirely within defendant’s discretion to determine if and at what level plaintiff would participate in the plan (see *Hunter v Deutsche Bank AG, N.Y. Branch,*56 AD3d 274 [1st Dept 2008]), and it is undisputed that defendant never exercised this discre*477tion. Furthermore, plaintiff’s contention that defendant was under a good faith obligation to set his participation level in the plan is undermined by defendant’s clear right to exercise its discretion in that regard *(id.).*

The unjust enrichment claim was properly dismissed, since it is duplicative of the breach of contract claim *(Benham*at 607).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
No. 12-7858.

#### Guy et al. *v.*City of Inglewood, California, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                        NEW VISUAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                    -----------------------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>
                                                   1996              1995
                                                   ----              ----

ENDING MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                 $       1.22       $   N/A
                                               ------------        ---------

AVERAGE MARKET PRICE PER SHARE                 $      1.53       $   N/A
                                               ------------        ---------

Net loss before preferred stock 
dividends                                      $(1,477,496)      $  (14,400)

ADD:

Cumulative preferred stock 
dividend (3)                                    (   75,000)             ---
                                               ------------        ---------

Net loss applicable to common shares           $(1,552,496)      $  (14,400)
                                               ------------        ---------
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding                                      8,766,567         1,543,983
                                               ------------        ---------

Primary earnings per share                            (.18)            (.01)
                                               ------------        ---------
FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Net loss for fully diluted earnings
per share                                      $(1,477,496)      $  (14,400)
                                               ------------        ---------
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding                                      8,916,567         1,543,983
                                               ------------        ---------
Fully diluted earnings per share                      (.17)            (.01)
                                               ------------        ---------
</TABLE>

(1) Shares assumed to be repurchased under the treasury stock method:
        Primary common stock equivalents are assumed to be repurchased at
        average market price.
        Fully diluted common stock equivalents are assumed to be repurchased at
        the greater of average or ending market price.
|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                                    
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                    
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 25.22  | 15.65  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7781.

#### Shatat *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-1297.

#### State v. Melson.

Hamilton App. No. C-170183. Appellant’s motion for stay denied.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
#### CP JBAM Holdings, LLC, Appellant, v Ira Shapiro et al., Respondents.

[54 NYS3d 853]—

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered February 9, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the first cause of action as against defendant Irene Shapiro, and the second and fifth causes of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion denied.

The “clear and unequivocal meaning” of the contractual language requiring defendant Irene Shapiro to obtain approvals of certain plans is that Shapiro was required merely to seek those approvals *(see Mionis v Bank Julius Baer & Co.,*301 AD2d 104, 110 [1st Dept 2002]). However, that reading would render meaningless or absurd the contractual terms regarding reduction of payment in the face of a failure to obtain the approvals *(Ambac Assur. UK Ltd. v J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgt., Inc.,*88 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2011]; *see also Mirvish v Mott,*18 NY3d 510, 520 [2012]). The conflict between the two provisions renders the asset purchase agreement ambiguous, and the motion to dismiss should have been denied *(see Chen v Yan,*109 AD3d 727 [1st Dept 2013]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Mazzarelli and Gische, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Loren L. McFarland, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mentor Corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
(1)   the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and
(2)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated: August 7, 2007
/s/ LOREN L. MCFARLAND
No. 12-8344.

#### Carrazco-Galvan *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 97 /Wednesday, May 20, 1998 / Presidential Documents 27665

Presidential Determination No. 98–22 of May 13, 1998

Sanctions Against India for Detonation of a Nuclear Explosive Device

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

In accordance with section 102(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, I

hereby determine that India, a non-nuclear-weapon state, detonated a nuclear

explosive device on May 11, 1998. The relevant agencies and instrumentalities of the United States Government are hereby directed to take the necessary actions to impose the sanctions described in section 102(b)(2) of

that Act.

You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this determination to

the appropriate committees of the Congress and to arrange for its publication

in the Federal Register

œ–.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, May 13, 1998. [FR Doc. 98–13601

Filed 5–19–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
No. 12-7649.

#### Cubas *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10(i)
 CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CASH PROFIT SHARING PLAN
  1.
    
    The Companys Board of Directors establishes a threshold for Earnings
Before Taxes (EBT) to provide a reasonable return to the
stockholders. The threshold is based upon an 8% RONA (defined as 8%
times avg. [adjusted assets less debt]). The threshold is estimated as
part of the budget process but determined based upon actual avg.
adjusted assets for the payout. Adjusted assets include accounts
receivable, inventory, other current assets, net fixed assets less
CIP, other assets and the NPV of outstanding financed leases.2.
    
    A profit sharing pool is created for profits exceeding this threshold.3.
    
    The pool will be created from 50% percent of EBT above the threshold
which will be shared with the salaried employees and non-represented
employees in the form of profit sharing4.
    
    The profit sharing pool will be capped at a maximum of 20% of EBT, as
established by the Board of Directors.5.
    
    The profit sharing pool is split into four groups, the officer
group, key manager group, salary group, and a non-represented
hourly group.6.
    
    The officer group is allocated 30% of the pool; the salary group is
initially allocated 57.5% of the pool; and the non-represented group
is allocated 12.5% of the pool. The salary pool is reduced by an
amount to effect a key management group payout (as a percentage of
earnings) of 50% of the officer group payout (as a percentage of
earnings). The profit sharing pools are ratably allocated to
individuals based upon their regular wages as a percentage of
aggregate regular wages, representing overall company performance.7.
    
    To be eligible to participate in the plan, an individual must be
actively employed on the date of the distribution of the profit
sharing or have retired at the age of 55 or older on or after December
31st of the profit sharing year. Officers, key managers,
salaried, and non-represented employees who become disabled or die
during the profit sharing year will be considered eligible to
participate in the plan. Officers, key managers, salaried, and
non-represented employees who are involuntarily terminated without
cause on or after December 31st of the profit sharing year
and who are not otherwise eligible for any severance (indemnification)
required by law will be considered eligible to participate in the
plan.8.
    
    The profit sharing payment is made to eligible participants on or
before March 31 of the year subsequent to the profit sharing year.