alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3D (No. 333-75259) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-87874 and
333-91165) of our report dated February 21, 2003 on the consolidated balance
sheets of DCB Financial Corp (the "Company") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2002, which report is incorporated by reference in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                             /s/ CROWE, CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLP
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 28, 2003
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Crosby, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Crosby, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      | 29     | 85     | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### H.M. v. Department of Public Welfare 106

02/01/2016

344 WAL (2015)

106

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
No. 12-8377.

#### Smith, aka Johnson *v.*New Jersey.

Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 8.46   | 10.83  | 6.33   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Com. v. Schirmer

09/30/2015

231 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 116 A.3d 697
*January 4, 2018*

2018-Ohio-25.]

2017-0200.

#### State v. Mason.

Marion App. No. 9-16-84, 2016-0hio-8400. On motion to participate in oral argument scheduled for January 23, 2018, of amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Motion granted. Amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellant.
Pines, LLC. 1- Due to steep topography, the parties began negotiations to 

relocate the easements. Following a mutual exchange of assurances that 

an agreement would be reached, Pines submitted a tentative map for the 

City of Reno's approval. Negotiations subsequently deteriorated and 

Kohlmoos refused to relocate the easements. 

Pines brought an action in district court, arguing that 

Kohlmoos had breached an agreement to relocate the easements and 

seeking specific performance. The district court found that although the 

parties had not agreed to exact locations for the new easements, they had 

entered into an agreement to negotiate in good faith. Concluding that 

Kohlmoos breached this agreement and that the proposed easements were 

the only feasible location, the district court awarded specific performance 

pursuant to Pines' tentative map. 

Nevada abides by traditional jurisprudence that agreements 

to agree are generally too indefinite to enforce as final agreements. May v. 

Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 672, 119 P.3d 1254, 1257 (2005); City of Reno v. 

Silver State Flying Seru., 84 Nev. 170, 176, 438 P.2d 257, 261 (1968) 

(noting that lain agreement to agree at a future time is nothing and will 

not support an action for damages" (quoting Salomon v. Cooper, 220 P.2d 

774, 775 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950))). After reviewing the record and the briefs 

presented on appeal, we decline to recognize at this time the enforceability 

of a preliminary agreement that requires the parties to negotiate in good 

1Pines is an entity created by the owners of land parcels 

surrounding Kenterprises' property. As the parties are familiar with the 

facts, we do not recount them further except as necessary to our 

disposition. 

2 
J 

Hardesty 

a-.--- 

Parraguirre 

J. 

J 

faith. Nor does the record include sufficient evidence of intent or definite 

terms to support a conclusion that the parties agreed to negotiate in good 

faith. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED. 

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Madelyn Shipman, Settlement Judge 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Reno 

Maupin, Cox & LeGoy 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

3
No. 12-7728.

#### Wright *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8166.

#### Cruz *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Marc Messina, Appellant-Respondent, v City of New York et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[49 NYS3d 408]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered April 27, 2016, insofar as it denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, and denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously *494modified, on the law, to grant plaintiffs motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The appeal from said order, to the extent it denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim predicated on Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.21 (b) (4) (iv), unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Plaintiff established his entitlement to partial summary judgment on the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim through his testimony that he was injured when the A-frame ladder on which he was standing moved underneath him as he applied pressure to it while trying to remove part of the drop ceiling he was demolishing *(see Hill v City of New York,*140 AD3d 568, 570 [1st Dept 2016]; *Ausby v 365 W. End LLC,*135 AD3d 481 [1st Dept 2016]). Plaintiff was not required to show that the ladder was defective or that he actually fell off the ladder to satisfy his prima facie burden *(see Hill,*140 AD3d at 570; *Reavely v Yonkers Raceway Programs, Inc.,*88 AD3d 561, 565 [1st Dept 2011]).

Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of the accident. There is no testimony in the record as to whether there were other readily available, adequate safety devices at the accident site that plaintiff declined to use *(see Gove v Pavarini McGovern, LLC,*110 AD3d 601 [1st Dept 2013]). Moreover, the evidence establishes that the ladder twisted underneath plaintiff because it was unsecured, not because he misused it, and that defendants provided no other safety devices for his use. At most, plaintiff’s application of pressure to the ladder while engaged in the work he was directed to do, which caused it to twist, was comparative negligence, no defense to a section 240 (1) claim *(Hill,*140 AD3d at 570; *Noor v City of New York,*130 AD3d 536, 541-542 [1st Dept 2015], *lv dismissed*27 NY3d 975 [2016]). “Regardless of the method employed by plaintiff to remove [the drop ceiling], the ladder provided to him was not an adequate safety device for the task he was performing” *(Carino v Webster Place Assoc., LP,*45 AD3d 351, 352 [1st Dept 2007]).

In view of the foregoing, the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim is academic *(see Howard v Turner Constr. Co.,*134 AD3d 523 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Slav Stein, certify that:1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AESP, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;b)
    intentionally omitted;c)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
controls over financial reporting. Date:
May 10, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Slav SteinName:
    
    Slav SteinTitle:
    
    President and ChiefExecutive Officer
#### Monte, Matter of, v Miccoli

1st Dept: 140 AD3d 630

denied*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pierre Demosthene, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 746]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered April 10, 2002, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s general waiver of his right to appeal was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. Accordingly, appellate review of his contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is precluded except to the extent that it may have affected the voluntariness of the plea *(see People v Herring,*274 AD2d 525, 526 [2000]; *People v Nicholas,*272 AD2d 629, 630 [2000]).

The defendant also contends that his plea was not knowing or voluntary because he was not completely informed of his sentencing options, and because he was not informed of the immigration consequences of his plea. Since the defendant never moved to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment on these grounds, these contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Aloisi,*177 AD2d 491 [1991]; CPL 470.05 [2]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1613 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Three Affiliated Tribes and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 
                      Equitable Compensation Act.
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Three Affiliated Tribes and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe 
                      Equitable Compensation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Time Extension.--Section 3508(d)(1) and section 3509(c)(1) of 
the Three Affiliated Tribes and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Equitable 
Compensation Act (Title XXXV; Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4731) are 
each amended by deleting ``1 year'' and inserting in lieu thereof in 
each such section ``twenty-six months''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall be 
considered as having taken effect October 30, 1992.

            Passed the Senate November 2, 1993.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 980415098-5098-8098-01; I.D. 031998A]


Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; 
Western Pacific Crustacean Fisheries; Vessel Monitoring System; Harvest 
Guideline; Closed Season; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a rule published in the Federal 
Register on April 27, 1998. The regulations implemented three 
management measures governing the crustacean fisheries in the exclusive 
economic zone around Hawaii.

DATES: Effective May 27, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alvin Katekaru, NMFS, 808-973-2985.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the classification section of the final 
rule published on April 27, 1998 (63 FR 20539),
    NMFS inadvertently omitted a word at the end of the third 
paragraph. Also, when NMFS revised the definition for Crustacean Permit 
Area I VMS Subarea in Sec.  660.12, NMFS inadvertently put a comma at 
the end of the definition.

Correction of Publication

    The publication on April 27, 1998 (63 FR 20539) [I.D. 031998A], FR 
Doc. 98-11017, is corrected as follows:
    On page 20540 in the second column, in the third paragraph under 
Classification, the word ``not'' should be inserted before the word 
``applicable''.


Sec. 660.12  [Corrected]

    On page 20540, in Sec. 660.12, in the definition of ``Crustaceans 
Permit Area I VMS Subarea'', in the third column, on the last line, the 
comma at the end of the definition should be removed and replaced with 
a period.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
David L. Evans,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-14249 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Com. v. A J.H.

08/17/2016

135 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 144 A.3d 201
S. 1732

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To extend arbitration under the provisions of chapter 44 of title 28, United States

Code, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ARBITRATION.

(a) AMENDMENT OF REPEAL.—Section 906 of the Judicial

Improvements and Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 651 note; Public

Law 100–702; 102 Stat. 4664) is amended in the first sentence

by striking out ‘‘5 years after the date of the enactment of this

Act’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 1994’’.

(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 905 of the

Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act (28 U.S.C. 651

note; Public Law 100–702; 102 Stat. 4664) is amended in the

first sentence by striking out ‘‘4’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

‘‘7’’.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EXPIRED PROVISIONS.

Chapter 44 of title 28, United States Code, and the item relating

to that chapter in the table of chapters at the beginning of part

III of such title, shall be effective on or after the date of the

enactment of this Act as if such chapter and item had not been

repealed by section 906 of the Judicial Improvements and Access

to Justice Act, as such section was in effect on the day before

the date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report of Boulder Capital Opportunties II,
      Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Michael J. Delaney, Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,


that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.




Dated:
              April 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Michael
              J. DelaneyMichael J. Delaney
              Chief Executive Officer
              Chief Financial Officer
No. 11-1155.

#### Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Montana, Inc. *v.*Fossen et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.