alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jerome J. Petrillo, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 679]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

After claimant’s former employment ended under nondisqualifying circumstances, he applied for and collected unemployment insurance benefits. During the benefit period, however, claimant performed various services in furtherance of his position as a licensed sales representative for a real estate broker’s office. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he was not totally unemployed at the time he received them, charging him with a recoverable overpayment and the loss of benefit days based upon its finding that claimant had made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits.

Substantial evidence in the record supports this determination. Hearing testimony disclosed that claimant admitted to an *949unemployment insurance investigator that he had performed activities relating to his real estate sales position on 22 separate dates during the benefit period. Claimant further admitted that he had received the unemployment insurance information handbook which explains the requirement of reporting any work-related activity, no matter how minimal or uncompensated. Despite this information, claimant repeatedly indicated on his certification for benefits that he was not engaged in any business or other activity that either produced or might produce income *(see Matter of Dobbs [Commissioner of Labor],*277 AD2d 550, 550 [2000]). Given claimant’s willful misrepresentation when applying for benefits, the overpayment thereof was properly ruled to be recoverable *(see Matter of Karpien [Commissioner of Labor],*297 AD2d 855, 856 [2002]; *Matter of Melnick [Commissioner of Labor],*268 AD2d 863, 864 [2000]). As substantial evidence supports the Board’s assessment of the credibility of the hearing testimony, as well as its separate findings regarding claimant’s willful misrepresentations, its decision will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Kabel [Kabel’s Gas Serv.—Commissioner of Labor],*267 AD2d 696, 696 [1999]). The remaining contentions and queries raised by claimant have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Tennessee Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Tennessee Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 860    | 860   
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 1,800  | 1,800  | 1,800  | 1,800  | 1,800 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,800  | 1,800  | 1,800  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7510.

#### Rouse *v.*Romero, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 11-1545.

No. 11-1547.

#### City of Arlington, Texas, et al. *v.*Federal Communications Commission et al.; and Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee of the New Orleans City Council *v.*Federal Communications Commission et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 936.] Motion of EMR Policy Institute for leave to file reply brief on the merits denied.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial
Officer of United Capital Corp.,  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 (the "Report") that:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 9, 2007

                                          By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                              ----------------------------------
                                             Anthony J. Miceli
                                             Chief Financial Officer
```
No. 12-8250.

#### Laguna *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25839-25840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Presidential Advisory Committee on High 
Performance Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and 
the Next Generation Internet

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
next meeting of the Presidential Advisory Committee on High Performance 
Computing and Communications, Information Technology, and the Next 
Generation Internet. The meeting will be open to the public. Notice of 
this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
(Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: May 19, 1998.

ADDRESSES: NSF Board Room (Room 1235), National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.


[[Page 25840]]


PROPOSED SCHEDULE AND AGENDA: The Presidential Advisory Committee will 
meet in open session from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and 
1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. on May 19, 1998. This meeting will include 
discussions on High Performance Computing in Asia and the status of the 
Presidential Advisory Committee draft interim report to the President 
on information technology. Time will also be allocated during the 
meeting for public comments by individuals and organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: The National Coordination Office for 
Computing, Information, and Communications provides information about 
this Committee on its web site at: http://www.ccic.gov; it can also be 
reached at (703) 306-4722. Public seating for this meeting is limited, 
and is available on a first-come, first-served basis.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-12339 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 12-7503.

#### Williams *v.*McCann et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Ronald Parr, Respondent, v Ronkonkoma Realty Venture I, LP, et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 389]

In an action, inter alia, for the imposition of constructive trusts and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), entered February 21, 2003, which denied their motion to vacate an amended notice of pendency.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff instituted this action seeking the imposition of constructive trusts with respect to four parcels of real property, to obtain specific performance of a certain agreement, dated April 30, 1999, entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant Pitcairn-Properties, Inc. (hereinafter PPI), and to recover damages for breach of the agreement. The action concerns four parcels of real property, two of which are owned by the defendant Ronkonkoma Realty Venture I, LLC (hereinafter the Islip Properties) and two of which are owned by Ronkonkoma Realty Venture II, LLC (hereinafter the Brookhaven properties). In July 2002 during the pendency of this action, the plaintiff, and PPI and Ronkonkoma Realty Venture I, LLC, entered into a settlement agreement dismissing the action and vacating the notice of pendency as against the Islip Properties. The agreement provided that an amended notice of pendency would be filed against the Brookhaven properties in accordance with a form annexed as an exhibit to the agreement. The amended notice of pendency dated July 10, 2002, was filed against all the defendants and all of the defendants stipulated to discontinue the action with respect to the Islip properties.

Thereafter in October 2002 the defendants moved to vacate the amended notice of pendency, contending that the action did not affect title to or possession of real property. The Supreme Court denied the motion on the ground that the settlement *821with respect to the Islip properties provided for the continuation of the notice of pendency as to the Brookhaven properties. We agree. Accordingly, we need not reach the question of whether the action affects title to or possession of real property.

The defendants’ argument that the owner of the Brookhaven properties, Ronkonkoma Realty Venture II, LLC, is not bound by the partial settlement agreement because it was not a signatory to the settlement agreement is raised for the first time in briefs before this Court and therefore is unpreserved for appellate review. This issue is not a pure question of law and may involve such factual issues of whether the signatories acted with apparent authority to bind the other defendants and whether the nonsignatories ratified the terms of the agreement *(see Suncoast Capital Corp. v Global Intellicom,*280 AD2d 281 [2001]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statements of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-131216, 333-137008, 333-147000, 333-149740, 333-150998 and 333-156665), and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-142768, 333-152642, 333-152643,333-161794, 333-171355 and 333-171356), of our report dated February 28, 2011 relating to our audits of the financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

*/S/****HEIN****& ASSOCIATES LLP*

Denver, Colorado 

February 28, 2011
No. 12-6128.

#### Brunson et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *result of operations of the
Trust.

Date: May 12, 2004                        Marcia Markowski
      -------------                       -----------------------------------
                                          Marcia Markowski
                                          Trust officer of The Corporate Trustee

* The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in financial
statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The Trust is required
to distribute all funds received after payment of expenses. Accordingly, the
Trust has not prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
*March 16, 2017*

2017-Ohio-922.]

2017-0356.

#### State ex rel. Franklin v. Stark Cty. Dept. of Job & Family Servs.

Stark App. No. 2016CA00109. On appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction. This cause originated in the court of appeals and, therefore, should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. 501.

The clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prae.R. 16.02 through 16.07.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1622

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, geophysical,

and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and development costs,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 4 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and development costs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND SURFACE

4 CASING COSTS TREATED LIKE INTANGIBLE

5 DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 263 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to intangible

8 drilling and development costs in the case of oil and gas
2

•S 1622 IS

1 wells and geothermal wells) is amended by inserting before

2 the last sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case

3 of oil and gas wells, the tax treatment which applies to

4 the taxpayer’s intangible drilling and development costs

5 shall also apply to surface casing costs and to geological

6 and geophysical costs for the purpose of ascertaining the

7 existence, location, extent, or quality of any deposit of oil

8 or gas within the United States (within the meaning of

9 section 638(1)) or a possession of the United States (with10 in the meaning of section 638(2)).’’

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (B)

12 of section 57(a)(2) of such Code is amended by adding

13 at the end the following new flush sentence:

14 ‘‘For purposes of clause (i), the term ‘intangible

15 drilling and development costs’ includes surface

16 casing costs and geological and geophysical

17 costs described in section 263(c).’’.

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 this section shall apply to costs paid or incurred after the

20 date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending

21 after such date.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5752 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5752

**Commission Decision of 16/08/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5752 - FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP / RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL ) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 16.08.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/12511

C(2010) 5778

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5752 - FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP/ RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL Notification of 12/07/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 109, 21/07/2010, p.19

1. On 12 July 2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Fortress Investment Group LLC (United States) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of parts of the undertaking Residential Capital LLC (the remaining European residential mortgage platforms of Residential Capital LLC in Germany, the Netherlands and the UK and portfolios of residential mortgage assets) wholly owned by GMAC Financial Services (United States) by way of purchase of assets.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

· for Fortress Investment Group LLC: to raise, invest and manage private equity funds, credit funds and liquid hedge funds.

· for Residential Capital LLC: mortgage origination from individual consumers; raising finance on the secondary market through securitizations and whole loan sales of mortgages to institutional investors; servicing of its mortgages including those sold/securitized on the secondary market.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Paul CSISZAR, Director for Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1769 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1769

         To make a technical amendment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 22, 1993

Mr. Johnston (for himself and Mr. Breaux) introduced the following bill

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To make a technical amendment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CDBG TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the city of Slidell, 
Louisiana may submit, not later than 10 days after the enactment of 
this Act, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall 
consider and accept, the final statement of community development 
objectives and projected use of funds required by section 104(a)(1) of 
the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 in connection with a 
grant to the city of Slidell under title 1 of such Act for fiscal year 
1994.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31(b)
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual
report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Herman F. Dick, Jr.Herman F. Dick, Jr.Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer