alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Bangladesh (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 3,419 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,640  | 20,585 | 6,394  | 3,624  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1215-DR]


Tennessee; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Tennessee, (FEMA-1215-DR), dated April 20, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 29, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Tennessee, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 20, 1998:

    Carroll and Blount Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Roane and Grainger Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for Public Assistance).
    Anderson and Dickson Counties for Public Assistance (already 
designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-12285 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.13   | 7.66   | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | 9.07  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:**

(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date:March 13, 2006 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER    
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | Dennis J. Stevermer        
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer and
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
May 23, 2014

CAAP-13-0000426

#### Gentry, In re Estate of

Affirmed
#### Emeneke H. Esony, Appellant, v Domingo Benitez, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 632]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated February 21, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

A magnetic resonance imaging of the plaintiffs lumbosacral spine showed *“a*broad based and paracentral disc herniation at the L4-5 level.” However, the defendant failed to demonstrate that the herniation was not causally related to the subject accident, or that it was not a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Shin v Torres,*295 AD2d 495 [2002]; *Franca v Parisi,*298 AD2d 554 [2002]; *Junco v Ranzi,*288 AD2d 440 [2001]; *Papadonikolakis v First Fid. Leasing Group,*283 AD2d 470 [2001]). Accordingly, the defendant failed to establish a prima facie case for judgment as a matter of law. Under these circumstances, we need not consider whether the plaintiffs’ papers were sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy,*226 AD2d 437 [1996]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# L_2010210EN.01003601.xml

| 11.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 210/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 210/36

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/397/EU of 3 June 2010 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and on provisional application of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Solomon Islands

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 190 of 22 July 2010
  )

In the title of the Decision, both on the cover page and on page 1, and also in the concluding formula on page 2:

for:

‘
  3 June 2010
  ’,

read:

‘
  11 June 2010
  ’.

---
July 19, 2012 

Administrator Lisa Jackson 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

re: EPA-R09-0AR-2012-0021, FRL 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

BKB 

ARIZONA 

B'l \1\/. 'I st South 

Snowflake, Arizona 85937 

VOICE (9281 536-7~03 

FAX [928) 536-2539 

www.ci.snowflake.az.us 

As Mayor of the Town of Snowflake and on behalf of our conununity, we respectfully re~uest an 

extension of the public conm1ent period. The proposal that was announced on July 211 by the 

EPA, including several rules that have not even been published in the Federal Register, related to 

regional haze in Arizona will be disastrous to the economy of Snowflake, Navajo County, our 

region and the State of Arizona and does not adequately consider the economic impacts of such 

rules and requirements. 

Also, we understand that the only public hearing on this issue has been scheduled in the Phoenix 

area and no hearings are plmmed for the areas that will be impacted the most including Navajo 

and Apache Counties. We would request the scheduling of a public hem·ing with adequate time 

and notice to allow our citizens in Navajo County to respond and for the EPA to receive regional 

input. 

We understand that the deadline for written comments on the proposed rule is August 31 , 2012. 

We request that the deadline for comments on the proposed rules be extended to 90 days after 

they are actually published in the Federal Register. 

We feel strongly that the economic vitality of our community will be significantly affected by 

the decisions of the EPA as many of our citizens and their fa111ilies rely on the employment 

provided by regional coal generating power pla11ts in this m·ea. Again we feel it is important to 

hold a public hearing in this region. Having a hearing in Phoenix will not acconunodate the 

voice of those most impacted by this proposed rule. Thank you for your attention to this very 

imp01ia11t issue. 

A resolution of the Council reemphasizing the importance of this issue will be forthcoming. 

Kelly S. Willis 

Mayor 

cc: Gina McCarthy I Assistant Administrator, U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation I 

USEPA Headqumiers, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code 

6101A, Washington, DC 20460 

Jm·ed Blumenfeld I Regional Administrator, U.S. EPA Region 9 I 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Fra11cisco, CA 94105
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14

- 15

- 00351

- CV

Janice A. Evans

v.

Professional Welding Supply, Inc., Southern Industrial Leasing and Ciro
Membreno

(No. 2013

- 20948 IN 190TH DISTR ICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING $10.00
$175.00 $20.00 09/15/2015

05/04/2015

05/04/2015 E

- PAID

PAID

PAID ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Housto n, Texas

are $205.00

.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the co st bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT O F APPEALS for the Fo urteenth District of Texas, October 6, 2015

.
No. 12-7127.

#### Waggoner *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Estate of Kathryn P. Faughey, by her Executor Walter B. Adam, Appellant, v New 56-79 IG Associates, L.P., et al., Respondents.

[52 NYS3d 12]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered December 16, 2015, which granted the motions of defendants 435 East 79 Street Associates, LLC and Charles A. Murkofsky (Tenants) and defendants New 56-79 IG Associates, L.P., New 57-79 IE Associates, L.P., BLDG Management Co., Inc., Building Management Co., Inc., and Lloyd Goldman (Owners) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The instant negligence action arises from the tragic murder of Kathryn P. Faughey (decedent) by nonparty David Tarloff while in her office in a suite leased by Tenants in a building owned by Owners.

The motion court correctly dismissed the complaint. Even though the building contained a psychiatric suite, defendants had no duty to protect decedent from the violent actions of third parties, including former patients like Tarloff; such actions were not foreseeable, given the absence of prior violent criminal activity by Tarloff or other third parties in the building *(Maheshwari v City of New York,*2 NY3d 288, 294 [2004]; *see Buckeridge v Broadie,*5 AD3d 298, 300 [1st Dept 2004]).

Even assuming that defendants had a duty to provide “minimal precautions” *(Jacqueline S. v City of New York,*81 NY2d 288, 293-294 [1993]), that duty was satisfied by the provision of 24/7 doorman coverage, surveillance cameras, controlled building access, and functioning locks on the doors of the office suite and decedent’s personal office *(see James v Jamie Towers Hous. Co.,*99 NY2d 639, 641 [2003]; *Nash v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*51 AD3d 337, 348 [1st Dept 2008], *revd on other grounds by Matter of World Trade Ctr. Bombing Litig.,*17 NY3d 428 [2011]). It is purely speculative that additional security measures — such as announcing visitors, installing an office intercom or buzzer, or keeping the office doors locked after hours — would have prevented Tarloff from killing decedent.

Any claims that the door man was negligent in failing to recognize Tarloff s suspicious behavior was not a proximate cause of decedent’s death because it was still not foreseeable that Tarloff was about to engage in a murderous rampage. Tarloff s conduct was a superceding cause severing the causal chain. Given that the attack was targeted and premeditated, it is *419“unlikely that any reasonable security measures would have deterred [Tarloff]” *(Cerda v 2962 Decatur Ave. Owners Corp.,*306 AD2d 169, 169 [1st Dept 2003] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *accord Buckeridge, 5*AD3d at 300).

Given the foregoing determination, we need not reach the issue of Murkofsky’s individual liability.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.
Exhibit 31-12
**FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATION**
I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofMichigan Consolidated Gas Company, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period EndingSeptember 30, 2004 of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  b. (Intentionally omitted)  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR Date: November 4, 2004  David E. Meador  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of  Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1723 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1723

         To improve provisions relating to tech-prep education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

   Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To improve provisions relating to tech-prep education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECH-PREP EDUCATION.

    (a) Contents of Program.--Paragraph (2) of section 344(b) of the 
Tech-Prep Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2394b(b)(2)) is amended by inserting 
``or 4 years'' before ``of secondary school''.
    (b) Consortia Membership.--Subsection (a) of section 343 of the 
Tech-Prep Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2394a) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2), by striking the 
        period and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
            ``(3) businesses, industries or labor unions; and
            ``(4) institutions of higher education that award 
        baccalaureate degrees.''.
    (c) Special Consideration; Priority.--Section 345 of the Tech-Prep 
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2394c) is amended--
            (1) by amending subsection (d) to read as follows:
    ``(d) Special Consideration.--The Secretary or the State board, as 
appropriate, shall give special consideration to applications which 
address effectively the issues of dropout prevention and re-entry and 
the needs of minority youths, youths of limited-English proficiency, 
youths with disabilities, and disadvantaged youths.'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (f) and (g), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(e) Priority.--The Secretary or the State board, as appropriate, 
shall give highest priority to applications that provide for effective 
employment placement activities or transfer of students to 4-year 
baccalaureate degree programs.''.

                                 <all>
```
#### People v Cooper

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 710

denied*