alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# FILED
December 23, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON OCTOBER 1997 SESSION

JERRY L. HUGHES, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 02C 01-9611-CC-00408 Appellant, ) ) LAKE COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. JOE G. RILEY, JR ., BILLY COMPTON, Warden, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Habeas corpus)

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: JERRY HUGHES (pro se) JOHN KNOX WALKUP Register No. 111099 Attorney General & Repor ter Rt. 1, Box 330 Tiptonville, TN 38079-9775 ELI ZABE TH T. RYAN Asst. Attorney General 450 Jame s Roberts on Pkwy. Nashville, TN 37243-0493 C. PHILLIP BIVENS District Attorney General P.O. Drawer E Dyersburg, TN 38024

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED JOHN H. PEAY, Judge1 The mens rea requirem ent for ag gravate d rape is inte ntional, kn owing or reckles s. See State v. Hill , __ S.W .2d __, __ (Tenn . 1997). 2 O P I N I O N

The petitioner filed his petiti on forwrit of habeas corpus on Sep tember 26, 1996 , alleging that he is being illegally restrained pursuant to a forty year senten c e imposed in 1 986 for t wo counts o f aggravat ed rape. He conten ds that th e underlyi n g convictions

are void because they ar e based on an invalid indi ctment. He alleges that the indictment is invalid because neither count includes an allegation of the mens rea element of the offense. The petitioner relies on this Cou rt's opinion i n State v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr. , No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267, Wayne County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed June 20, 1996, at Nashv ille). The court below summarily dismissed the petition, and this appeal as of r

ight follow

ed. We affirm.

We first note that the Hill case dealt with a post- 1989 indictment whereas this case involves

a 1986 indictment. This Court has previously held that its decision in Hill is inapposite to pre-1989 i ndictments. See, e.g. , James Clyde Saylor v . H oward Carlton and State , No. 03C01-9612-CR-00453, J ohnson County (Tenn. Crim. A pp. filed Oct. 31, 1997, at Knoxville). Moreover, irrespec tive of its applicabili

ty to this case, our Supreme Court has overruled this Court's decision in Hill

. See State v. Hill , __ S.W.2d

__(Tenn . 1997). Further, each of the contested counts of the indictment in this case allegesthat the petitioner “with force and arms, in the County aforesaid, unlawfully, and feloniously committed the offe nse of Aggravated Rape by engaging in unlaw

ful sexual penetration of [the victim], and the said [victim] is a chil d less than thirteenyears of age.” The use of the terms “with force and arms” and “feloniously” are sufficient to allege the culpable mental state for aggrav ated rape. 1 The petitioner's contention is therefore3

without merit.
The judgment below is affirmed.

___________________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge
CONCUR:

______________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, Ju dge

______________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge
No. 12-7132.

#### Ruth *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 0      | 2,247  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
I

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1546

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1994

Referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise certain

administrative provisions relating to the United States

Court of Veterans Appeals, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court of Veterans Ap5 peals Improvement Act of 1994’’.
2

S 1546 RFH

1 SEC. 2. CONFIRMATION OF CHIEF JUDGE.

2 Section 7253(b) of title 38, United States Code, is

3 amended by striking out ‘‘The judges’’ and inserting in

4 lieu thereof ‘‘The chief judge and the associate judges’’.

5 SEC. 3. MAILING OF NOTICES OF APPEAL TO THE COURT

6 OF VETERANS APPEALS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7266(a) of title 38, Unit8 ed States Code, is amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(a)(1) In order to obtain review by the Court of Vet10 erans Appeals of a final decision of the Board of Veterans’

11 Appeals, a person adversely affected by such decision shall

12 file a notice of appeal with the Court within 120 days after

13 the date on which notice of the decision is mailed pursuant

14 to section 7104(e) of this title.

15 ‘‘(2) An appellant shall file a notice of appeal under

16 this section by delivering or mailing the notice to the

17 Court.

18 ‘‘(3) A notice of appeal shall be deemed to be received

19 by the Court as follows:

20 ‘‘(A) On the date of receipt by the Court, if the

21 notice is delivered.

22 ‘‘(B) On the date of the United States Post

23 Service postmark stamped on the cover in which the

24 notice is posted, if the notice is mailed.

25 ‘‘(4) For a notice of appeal mailed to the Court to

26 be deemed to be received under paragraph (3)(B) on a
3

S 1546 RFH

1 particular date, the United States Postal Service postmark

2 on the cover in which the notice is posted must be legible.

3 The Court shall determine the legibility of any such post4 mark and the Court’s determination as to legibility shall

5 be final and not subject to review by any other Court.’’.

6 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub7 section (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactment

8 of this Act and shall apply to notices of appeal that are

9 delivered or mailed to the United States Court of Veterans

10 Appeals on or after that date.

11 SEC. 4. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES

12 UNDER CONTINGENT FEE AGREEMENTS.

13 Section 5904(d)(2)(A) of title 38, United States

14 Code, is amended to read as follows:

15 ‘‘(A) A fee agreement referred to in paragraph (1)

16 of this subsection is one under which the total amount

17 of the fee payable to the attorney (i) is to be paid to the

18 attorney by the Secretary directly from any past-due bene19 fits awarded on the basis of the claim, and (ii) is contin20 gent on whether or not the matter is resolved in a manner

21 favorable to the claimant.’’.

Passed the Senate March 25 (legislative day, February 22), 1994.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

September 29, 2008

Sheila & William Steiner

2600 Island Boulevard — Unit 2006        Aventura, FL 33160

|   | RE: | Lease dated September 9, 2005 for 290 NE 68th Street, 297 NE 67th Street                        and 277 NE 67th Street, Miami, FL |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dear Sheila and William:

This letter is to confirm that Steiner-Atlantic Corp is exercising its option under Section 23 of the above captioned Lease to renew the Lease for another 36-month period commencing November 1, 2008 and ending on October 31, 2011.

Please confirm that you have received a copy of this letter by signing below.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Michael S. Steiner

Michael S. Steiner

President

RECEIVED BY:

| /s/ William K. Steiner |
|------------------------|

William K. Steiner

| /s/ Sheila Steiner |
|--------------------|

Sheila Steiner

**STEINER-ATLANTIC CORP.**

**MAILING ADDRESS:**PO.BOX 380578 - MIAMI, FLORIDA 33238-0578**DADE:**305/754-4551 -**TOLL FREE:**1-800/333-8883

**FAX:**305/751-8390 –**WEBBSITE:**WWW.STEINERATLANTIC.COM

**OFFICE & SHOWROOM:**290 N.E. 68TH STREET - MIAMI, FLORIDA 3313I3-5567

 

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 26, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-534-000]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Application

May 19, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 11, 1998, Colorado Interstate Gas Company 
(CIG), P.O. Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, filed in Docket 
No. CP98-534-000 an abbreviated application pursuant to Section 7(c) of 
the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and 
necessity authorizing the construction and operation of certain one-
inch diameter wellhead fuel lines located in it's Panhandle Field in 
Potter and Moore Counties, Texas, all as more fully set forth in the 
application on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    CIG states that the purpose of the fuel gas lines is to provide 
processed fuel gas to seven wellhead compressors and would provide a 
more efficient operation of these compressors and decrease maintenance 
requirements. CIG estimates the cost of these facilities to be 
approximately $75,000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before June 9, 1998, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for CIG to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13839 Filed 5-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-6804.

#### Porter *v.*Sauve et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-704.

#### Bone *v.*G4S Youth Services, LLC, et al. and Twiggs *v.*Selig et al.

(679 F. 3d 990). C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
combustionsurvey - FW: Request for Additional Information for Industrial Boiler MACT 

Reconsideration 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:30PM -----

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Monroe, Larry S." <LSMONROE@southernco.com> 

Date: 07/16/2011 11:04AM 

Cc: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mitchell, Aaron David" <AADMITCH@southernco.com>

Subject: FW: Request for Additional Information for Industrial Boiler MACT Reconsideration 

(See attached file: Georgia Power Additional Information for IB MACT Reconsideration.pdf)

Bob and Mary:

Here are Georgia Power’s response to the IB MACT request for information. Southern Company 

did not file comments as a whole, so this should be all that you see from us.

Larry

From: Mitchell, Aaron David 

Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 3:54 PM 

To: 'shrager.brian@epa.gov'; 'combustionsurvey@erg.com' 

Subject: Request for Additional Information for Industrial Boiler MACT Reconsideration

 

Mr. Shrager, 

 

Please find attached Georgia Power’s response to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 

request for additional information for Industrial Boiler MACT Reconsideration Process; 76 FED. 

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:30 PM

Subject: FW: Request for Additional Information for Industrial Boiler MACT Reconsideration

Attachments: Georgia Power Additional Information for IB MACT Reconsideration.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AE9BDO... 8/2/2011
REG. 28662 (MAY 18, 2011); Docket ID. No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0058 and EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–

0119. 

 

Georgia Power appreciates the opportunity to submit the enclosed information to inform the 

reconsideration of the EPA’s National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 

for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters. 

 

Sincerely, 

Aaron 

 

Aaron Mitchell 

Air Programs Supervisor

Georgia Power Company 

Phone: (404) 506-1364

= 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AE9BDO... 8/2/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1716 Committee Discharged Senate (CDS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1716

 To amend the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act to extend 
                       the deadlines for reports.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

 Mr. Robb (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

                          Committee discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act to extend 
                       the deadlines for reports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTS FROM THE COMMISSION.

    Section 9 of the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act (36 
U.S.C. 149 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``December 31, 1992'' 
        and inserting ``March 15, 1994''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``December 31, 1993'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUDIT OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 10(b) of the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act 
(36 U.S.C. 149 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 31, 1992'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``March 15, 1994'';
            (2) by striking ``March 4, 1994'' and inserting ``March 3, 
        1995''; and
            (3) by striking ``1993'' and inserting ``1994''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains year-to-date summary financial information extracted from
Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal 2000 third quarter Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,147
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,997
<INVENTORY>                                     84,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,662
<PP&E>                                         845,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                 392,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 887,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,629
<BONDS>                                        214,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   887,010
<SALES>                                        333,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               333,970
<CGS>                                          328,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,906)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (46)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (18,415)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,772)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,772)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)



</TABLE>
October 5 , 2010

VIA E

- MAIL TO PATRICK AU

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Emissions Assessment Branch

Stationary Source Division

Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Subject: 1) Submittal s of Amended Rule 901 (New Source Performance Standards [NSPS] ) and a Negative

Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Regulations on Emission Guidelines for

Existing Sources

, 2) Request to Submit a Delegation of Authority Request to EPA on the Behalf of Santa Barbara

C ounty APCD to Implement and Enforce the Appropriate NSPS Listed in Rule 901, and

3) Request to Submit a Request to EPA on the Behalf of Santa Barbara County to Modify the State

Plan to Reflect that there are no D esignated F acilities L ocated in Santa Barba ra County for the

S even Emission Guidelines Identified in the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules

Dear Mr. Guzzetta:

On September 20, 2010 , the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors held a public

hearing on adopting 1) proposed amendments to Rule 901

, New Source Performance Standards, and 2) a Negative

Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Regulations on Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources

. After the public hearing, the Board adopted amended Rule 90 1 and the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules

.

Attached are the following documents relative to the Board approvals:

1. Amended Rule 901

, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS),

2. Copy of the Public Notice for the proposed amended Rule 901 Board Heari ng and the proposed Negative

Declaration in Lieu of Rules Board Hearing

, 3. September 16, 2010 Agenda (includes “Discussion” and Announcements”) and a Staff Report for Agenda Items

on September 16, 2010 Calendar

4. Signed Resolution and Minute Order for amended Rule 901

, 5. Board of Directors Agenda Packet for amending Rule 901

, 6. Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Emission Guidelines and Negative Declaration

Findings,

7. Signed Resolution and Minute Order for the Negative Declarat ion in Lieu of Rules , and

8. Board of Directors Agenda Packet

We are not submitting Rule 901 or the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules for inclusion into the State

Implementation Plan. Hence, we are not including SIP Completeness Checklists with this pac kage.

The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District requests the Air Resources Board to request on our behalf

that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency :

1. G rant delegation authority to us for the appropriate New Source Performance Standard s listed in Rule 901,

and
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-010
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor