alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 04a0060n.06

Filed: November 1, 2004

No. 03-1948

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LEONARD McCALL,

Defendant-Appellant

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: MERRITT, DAUGHTREY and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. This appeal from a judgment revoking the federal term of supervised

release of the defendant, McCall, raises the question of whether due process forbids a delay in the

issuance of a warrant for violation of supervised release while the defendant remains in state

custody. McCall concededly violated his federal parole in connection with the state crime of

receiving and concealing stolen property for which he was sentenced to state custody. The U.S.

Probation Office requested issuance of a parole violations warrant on November 8, 2001. The

warrant was not served until June 6, 2003, when McCall was released by the state. A hearing was

conducted thereafter. McCall argues that this delay violates due process. U.S. v. Throneburg, 87

F.3d 851, 853 (6th Cir. 1996), rejects this very argument in a case in which there was a delay of two
No. 03-1948

United States v. McCall

-2-

years while the defendant served his state term for a crime which gave rise to the federal parole

violation.

McCall also argues that the record below supports a finding that the District Judge was

unfamiliar with the federal sentencing guidelines and did not know that the guidelines are advisory

only with respect to sentencing for parole violations. To the contrary, McCall’s own lawyer advised

the District Court at Appendix page 69 that the guideline range is advisory only.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1071 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, Mississippi, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2011 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, Mississippi, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medgar Evers House 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con8 duct a special resource study of the home of the late civil 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1071 IH

1 rights activist Medgar Evers, located at 2332 Margaret 

2 Walker Alexander Drive in Jackson, Mississippi. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the site as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

15 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or16 ganizations or any other interested individuals; and 

17 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

20 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

21 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec22 tion 8 of National Park Service General Authorities Act 

23 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

24 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

25 on which funds are first made available for the study 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1071 IH

1 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

2 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep3 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

4 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

5 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

6 the Secretary. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
May 29, 2014

CAAP-13-0000208

#### Citibank, N.A. v. Freitas

Affirmed
February 6, 2013

No. 12A769.

#### HealthBridge Management, LLC, et al. *v.*Kreisberg, Regional Director of Region 34 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board.

D. C. Conn. Application for stay, presented to Justice Scalia, and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

|                                                     |  |                       
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                             |  | Dated: August 14, 2008
|                                                     |  |                       
|Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                 |  |                       
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  |                       
|(principal financial and accounting
 officer)        |  |                       

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp.
and will be retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

20

---
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1,517  | 6,194  | 848    | 174    | 7,259  | 56,844 | 45,180 | 40,805 | 42,965
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 44,853 | 52,164 | 63,314 | 71,770 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7631.

#### Thomas *v.*Jones et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26243-26244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12495]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2806]


Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection; DSP-5, 
Application/License for Permanent Export of Unclassified Defense 
Articles and Related Unclassified Technical Data.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

[[Page 26244]]

    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatmenet, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Application/License for Permanent 
Export of Unclassified Defense Articles and Related Unclassified 
Technical Data.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-5.
    Respondents: Applicants for Export Licenses of Defense Articles and 
Related Technical Date.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 10,000.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Comments regarding the collection listed in this notice or requests for 
copies of the proposed collection and supporting documents should be 
directed to Charles S. Cunningham, Directives Management Branch, U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12495 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28417-28418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Subcommittee Meeting on 
Plant Operations; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Plant Operations will hold a meeting on 
June 19, 1998, in Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:
    Friday, June 19, 1998--8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.
    The Subcommittee will discuss the proposed changes to 10 CFR 50.59 
(Changes, Tests and Experiments), status of resolution of issues 
identified in the March 24, 1998 Staff Requirements Memorandum related 
to SECY-97-205, ``Integration and Evaluation of Results From Recent 
Lessons-Learned Reviews,'' and related matters. The purpose of this 
meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, 
and to formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for 
deliberation by the full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify one of the cognizant ACRS staff engineers 
named below five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that 
appropriate arrangements can be made.
    During the initial portion of the meeting, the Subcommittee, along 
with any of its consultants who may be present, may exchange 
preliminary views regarding matters to be considered during the balance 
of the meeting.
    The Subcommittee will then hear presentations by and hold 
discussions with representatives of the NRC staff, and other interested 
persons regarding this review.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, whether the 
meeting has been canceled or rescheduled, and the Chairman's ruling on 
requests for the opportunity to present oral statements and the time 
allotted therefor, can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS 
staff engineers, Mr. Michael T. Markley (telephone 301/

[[Page 28418]]

415-6885) or Mr. Amarjit Singh (telephone 301-415-6899) between 7:30 
a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are 
urged to contact one of the above named individuals one or two working 
days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the 
agenda, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 18, 1998.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-13711 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1783

To amend the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act to allow proceeds

from the sale of coins to be used to renovate the Mount Rushmore

National Memorial.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 24 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 23), 1993

Mr. DASCHLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered,

read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To amend the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act

to allow proceeds from the sale of coins to be used

to renovate the Mount Rushmore National Memorial.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF PROCEEDS FROM MOUNT RUSHMORE

4 COMMEMORATIVE COINS.

5 (a) DISTRIBUTION OF SURCHARGES.—Section 8 of

6 the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act (104 Stat.

7 314; 31 U.S.C. 5112 note) is amended by striking para8 graphs (1) and (2) and inserting the following:
2

•S 1783 IS

1 ‘‘(1) the first $18,750,000 shall be paid during

2 fiscal year 1994 by the Secretary to the Society to

3 assist the Society’s efforts to improve, enlarge, and

4 renovate the Mount Rushmore National Memorial;

5 and

6 ‘‘(2) the remainder shall be returned to the

7 Federal Treasury for purposes of reducing the

8 national debt.’’.

9 (b) RETROACTIVE EFFECT.—If, prior to the enact10 ment of this Act, any amount of surcharges have been re11 ceived by the Secretary of the Treasury and paid into the

12 United States Treasury pursuant to section 8(1) of the

13 Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act, as in effect

14 prior to the enactment of this Act, that amount shall be

15 paid out of the Treasury to the extent necessary to comply

16 with section 8(1) of the Mount Rushmore Commemorative

17 Coin Act, as in effect after the enactment of this Act.

18 Amounts paid pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be

19 out of funds not otherwise appropriated.

Æ
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3,145  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17,304 | 33,783 | 33,215 | 21,642 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6075.

#### F. H. et ux. *v.*Shimko et al.

Ct. App. Ohio, Stark County. Certiorari denied.
# L_2010278EN.01003201.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/32

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/621/EU of 8 October 2010 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 273 of 19 October 2010
  )

On the cover, and on pages 2 and 3, in the title and the concluding formula:

for:

‘
  8 October 2010
  ’,

read:

‘
  7 October 2010
  ’.

---
No. 12-782.

#### McMaster et al. *v.*Small.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 12

                         MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                              (Dollars in Millions)
                                        
                                                   Six Months Ended
                                                       June 30
                                                   ---------------
                                                  1997         1996
                                                  ----         ----
1.  EARNINGS

     a) Income before interest expense,
         income taxes and undistributed
         equity earnings ....................  $  566.1      $  489.1

     b) Single Business Tax (2)..............      17.3          17.2

     c) Portion of rental expense
         representative of the
         interest factor (1)(2)..............       5.9           6.3
                                               --------      --------
     Total 1(a) through 1(c).................  $  589.3      $  512.6
                                               --------      --------
2.  FIXED CHARGES

     a) Total interest expense including
         capital lease obligations ..........  $   41.6      $   42.2

     b) Capitalized interest.................       0.7           1.0

     c) Portion of rental expense
         representative of the
         interest factor (1).................       5.9           6.3
                                               --------      --------
     Total 2(a) through 2(c).................  $   48.2      $   49.5
                                               --------      --------
3.  RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES.......     12.23         10.36
                                                  =====         =====


(1)  We consider one third of total rental expense to represent return on
     capital.
     
(2)  Earnings represent income before income taxes and fixed charges.
     Since we have already deducted the Single Business Tax (the Tax)
     and rental expense in our calculation of income before tax (item
     1a), the Tax and the one-third portion of rental expense
     considered to be fixed charges are added back to arrive at total
     earnings.