alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1204 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption for aggregation 

of emissions from oil and gas development sources, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. POLIS (for himself, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HOLT, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. STARK, and Mr. 

HONDA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the exemption 

for aggregation of emissions from oil and gas development sources, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE CLEAN AIR ACT. 

4 (a) HYDROGEN SULFIDE AS A HAZARDOUS AIR POL5 LUTANT.—Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 7412) is amended by adding ‘‘Hydrogen Sulfide’’ to the 

7 list of hazardous air pollutants under subsection (b)(1) of 

8 such section. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1204 IH

1 (b) REPEAL OF EXEMPTION FOR AGGREGATION OF

2 EMISSIONS FROM OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT

3 SOURCES.—Section 112(n) of the Clean Air Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 7412(n)) is amended by striking paragraph (4). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Virginia Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Virginia Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3,638 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,967  | 2,000  | 3,700  | 4,000  | 4,000  | 3,417  | 3,417  | 3,300  |        | 3,300 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,300  | 3,300  | 3,300  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    Notice is hereby given that on April 17, 1998, a proposed Consent 
Decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Kansas in United States v. Texaco Pipeline, Inc., et al., 
Civ. No. 96-2152-GTV (D. Kan.). The proposed Consent Decree settles 
claims asserted by the United States at the request of the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') in an action 
originally filed on April 1, 1996. The United States filed this action 
pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly referred 
to as the Clean Water Act (``CWA'' or ``Act''), 33 U.S.C. Secs. 1251 et 
seq. The complaint requested the assessment of civil penalties and 
injunctive relief against defendants Texaco Pipeline, Inc. (``Texaco 
Pipeline'') and Texaco Trading and Transportation, Inc. (``Texaco 
Trading'') for discharges of oil into navigable waters of the United 
States or adjoining shorelines in violation of Sections 301 and 311 of 
the CWA, 33 U.S.C. 1311 and 1321. These discharges took place from the 
defendants' pipeline systems in the State of Kansas.
    Under the proposed Consent Decree, the defendants' collectively 
will pay to the United States a $925,000 civil penalty. In addition, 
Texaco Trading shall purge and permanently remove from service 
specified portions of its pipeline system. The defendants also shall 
undertake additional injunctive relief which includes the lowering of 
pipeline, improved maintenance of pipeline, and inspection of pipeline 
within the State of Kansas.
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and 
should refer to United States v. Texaco Pipeline Inc., et al., DOJ #90-
5-1-1-4272. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the EPA 
Region 7 Office at 726 Minnesota Ave., Kansas City, KS 66101. A copy of 
the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005 (202) 624-0892. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
in the amount of $8.00 (25 cents per page) payable to the ``Consent 
Decree Library''.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-12630 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
No. 12-7755.

#### McCoy *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1761

To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FOREST SERVICE SEPARATION PAY.—

4 (a) In order to avoid or minimize the need for involuntary

5 separations, effective for the period beginning upon the

6 date of enactment of this Act through and including Sep7 tember 30, 1994, the Secretary of Agriculture, under such

8 regulations and subject to such conditions as the Secretary

9 of Agriculture may prescribe, shall have authority to offer

10 separation pay to employees of the Forest Service to the

11 same extent the Secretary of Defense is authorized to offer
2

S 1761 CPS

1 separation pay to employees of a defense agency in section

2 5597 of title 5, United States Code.

3 (b) In the event that an authority is enacted to offer

4 separation pay or a voluntary separation incentive similar

5 to such section 5597 of title 5, United States Code, but

6 applicable to employees in the executive branch generally,

7 the authority under subsection (a) shall terminate.

8 (c) Such payments may be made to employees who

9 agree, during a continuous 90 day period designated by

10 the agency head, beginning no earlier than the date of en11 actment of this Act and ending no later than September

12 30, 1994, to separate from service with the agency, wheth13 er by retirement or resignation.

14 (d) An employee who has received a voluntary separa15 tion incentive under this section and accepts employment

16 with the Government of the United States within 5 years

17 of the date of the separation on which payment of the in18 centive is based shall be required to repay the entire

19 amount of the incentive to the agency that paid the incen20 tive.

21 (e) Total outlays by the Forest Service pursuant to

22 the cooperative work trust funds accounts (12–8028–0–

23 7–302) shall not exceed $271,668,000 in fiscal year 1994.

Æ
No. 12-881.

#### Harris *v.*Hall.

Ct. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Delaware Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Delaware Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |         |         |         | 46,511 | 40,809 | 56,013
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 48,387 | 50,113 | 52,216  | 46,177 | 48,057  | 46,904  | 43,190  | 48,155 | 48,162 | 50,148
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 54,825 | 79,715 | 101,676 | 95,978 | 101,379 | 102,693 | 108,562 | 98,966 | 95,516 | 89,767
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 85,942 | 79,680 | 85,811  |        |         |         |         |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12M67.

#### Strausbaugh *v.*Government Printing Office.

Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran granted.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-377-CV

SHERRIE TAYLOR	APPELLANT

	V.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Sherrie Taylor’s brief was originally due on March 16, 2005.  On March 21, 2005, we granted her motion for an extension of time to file her appellate brief, extending the deadline to May 16, 2005.  On June 6, 2005, we granted her second motion for an extension of time to file the brief, extending the deadline to July 15, 2005.  We also stated in that order that no further extensions would be granted.  On August 22, 2005, Appellant filed an amended third motion for an extension of time to file her brief.  We denied that motion on August 24, 2005.  On August 29, 2005, we notified Appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).2  We stated that we could dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution unless she or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.3  Appellant filed a response, but it does not reasonably explain her failure to timely file a brief.

	Accordingly, because Appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.4

									PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  September 29, 2005
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Gulf LNG, Mississippi Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Egypt (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Gulf LNG, Mississippi Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Egypt (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun   | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2011                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     | 2,954 |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8347.

#### Mothershed *v.*Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Assn. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Atrazine: Atrazine:CWS Spreadsheet Submission CWS Spreadsheet Submission

Melanie Biscoe Melanie Biscoe to: dan.campbell 12/29/2010 05:05 PM

Hi Dan,

I wanted to request ahead of time that Syngenta submit the spreadsheets of atrazine and simazine CWS 

data from 2010 at the same time it submits the AMP and SMP reports for 2010. At the end of January 

2009 Syngenta provided both the reports and the spreadsheets for 2008, so I'd anticipate that 

simultaneous submission could also be done this year , particularly given advanced notice. If this is not 

going to be feasible please let me know as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Melanie Biscoe

Chemical Review Manager

Risk Management and Implementation Branch IV (RMIB IV)

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (PRD)

Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP)

biscoe.melanie@epa.gov

703-305-7106
No. 12-8017.

#### White *v.*Heyns, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Preliminary Regulatory Determinations 3 - Dimethoate References
No. 12-545.

#### Suever et al. *v.*Chiang et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Brendan Tremaine GRIFFIN, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

Case No. 5D16-1937

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Mark S. Blechman, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,994
<INVENTORY>                                     72,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,321
<PP&E>                                         140,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,304
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          139,957
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           479
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,304
<SALES>                                         92,115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,344
<CGS>                                           66,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,833
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133071 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133071 

 COA: 274693 

St. Joseph CC: 05-013193-FC

KEVIN LEROY MCDONALD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
No. 12-7340.

#### Lindensmith *v.*Jerome et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | 10.07  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024