alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-13-00113-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EXEL BOBBINS AND 

PLASTIC COMPONENTS, INC., Appellant,

v.

SUNLINE COMMERCIAL

CARRIERS, INC., Appellee.

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on May 7, 2013, and the parties were 

ordered to mediation. This cause is now before the Court on an agreed, joint motion for 

disposition pursuant to the parties’ agreement. Accordingly, this case is hereby 

REINSTATED.
2

The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the 

matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to agreement, the parties request this Court to set 

aside the trial court’s final judgment and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with their agreement.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the joint motion filed by the 

parties herein, is of the opinion that it should be and is GRANTED. We SET ASIDE the 

trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and REMAND the case to the trial court 

for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party 

incurring same. See id. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax 

costs against the appellant."). The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. 

See id. 18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the 

mandate immediately.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

18th day of June, 2013.
### ***EXHIBIT 8.1***

### *** ***

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

 

**Wholly-Owned**

 

·                  Euro Tech Trading(Shanghai) Limited – a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                  Euro Tech (China)Limited – a Hong Kong corporation

·                  ChinaH2O.comLimited – a Hong Kong corporation

·                  Shanghai Euro TechLimited – a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                  Shanghai Euro TechEnvironmental Engineering Company, Ltd. – a People’s Republic of Chinacorporation

·                  Chongqing Euro Tech Rizhi Technology Company, Limited– a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                  Rizhi Euro TechInstrument (Shaanxi) Company Limited– a People’sRepublic of China corporation

 

**Majority Owned**

 

·                  Yixing Pact EnvironmentalTechnology Company Limited – a PRC corporation

·                  Pact Asia Pacific Limited – aBVI corporation

 

----
#### Estate of Gen Yee Chu v Otsego Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

2d Dept: 148 AD3d 677

denied
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Black Tusk Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kurt Bordian, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of        2002, that: 

|   | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: August 29, 2008 | By  /s/ Kurt Bordian                                               

       Kurt Bordian

       Secretary and Treasurer

       Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

45

----
#### UNITED STATES v. QUINN.

Nos. 10086, 10087.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit

May 23, 1950.

*253Raymond G. Quinn, pro se.

Otto Kerner, Jr., U. S. Atty., Joseph E. Tobin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chicago, 111., for appellee.

Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SWAIM, Circuit Judges.

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

These appeals involve motions to vacate, set aside and cancel sentences imposed upon the defendant in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The appeals were heard together as the motions are identical in language and involve practically the same facts.

It appears from the files and records, as well as from the allegations of the defendant’s petition, that:

The defendant was arrested on August 28, 1947, and arraigned before the Commissioner on a complaint charging possession of stolen mail.

On September 8, 1947, two indictments, one numbered 47 CR 555 and the other 47 CR 556, were returned by the September Grand Jury against the defendant. Number 47 CR 555 charged a violation of the Dyer Act, Sec. 408,1 Title 18 U.S.C., and indictment number 47 CR 556 charged violations of postal laws. Sec. 347 and 317,1 Title 18 U.S.C.

On September 10, 1947, the defendant, represented by counsel, appeared for arraignment and entered pleas of guilty to both indictments. On his plea of guilty he was sentenced on the mail charge, No. 47 CR 556, for a term of three years to follow the sentence he was then serving. The defendant was sentenced in cause number 47 CR 555 for a term of three years to run concurrently with the sentence imposed in number 47 CR 556.

The judgment order entered in case number 47 CR 556 showed the sentence to be three years and failed to state that the sentence was to follow and be consecutive to a sentence in cause number 27834, which the defendant was then serving.

On September 16, 1947, the defendant again appeared in court, represented by counsel, and on motion of the Government the court corrected the record to agree with the sentence as imposed on September 10, 1947. The defendant remained in the custody of the United States Marshal from the date of his arrest until September 18, 1947, when he was delivered to the warden of the United States Penitentiary, at Leavenworth.

On September 21, 1949, the present motions to vacate his sentences were filed. They were dismissed on the same day. These were the orders from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The motions, and the files and rec*254ords of the cases show conclusively that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. On September 16, 1947, the court merely corrected its records by causing them to show what sentences were in fact imposed on September 10, 1947. This was permissible under Rule 36 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, 18 U.S.C.A. It did not constitute a vacation of the original sentences.

Under, the authority of United States v. Fleenor, 7 Cir., 177 F.2d 482, the trial court properly dismissed the motions without hearing, and its orders to that effect are therefore affirmed.

1

. gee 1948 Revised Criminal Codo, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1702. 1708. 2311-2.313.
#### Smolsky, In re Estate of 66

07/27/2016

193 MAL (2016)

66

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 586
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet  for  Metaline Mining  &  Leasing Company  at September 30, 2000, and the
Statements of Income  for  the period ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,071,628
<SECURITIES>                                    13,117
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,084,745
<PP&E>                                           4,122
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,088,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       954,282
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,088,897
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,514
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,926
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00








</TABLE>
No. 12-7536.

#### Ewell *v.*Scribner, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir.

Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32








SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Dennis
W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report
being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said
periodic report.








/s/ Dennis W.
      DollDennis
      W. DollChief
      Executive Officer








Date:  November
6, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# L_2010051EN.01002601.xml

| 2.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 51/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 51/26

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 70/2010 of 25 January 2010 amending for the 119th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 20 of 26 January 2010
  )

On page 2, in point (1), under (c):

for:

‘(c) Tanzim Qa’idat al-Jihad fi Jazirat al-Arabm,’

read:

‘(c) Tanzim Qa’idat al-Jihad fi Jazirat al-Arab,’

On page 2, in point (2)(a), under (i):

for:

‘(i) Salahm,’

read:

‘(i) Salah,’

---
1995-0042.

#### State v. Wogenstahl.

Hamilton App. No. C-930222. Reported at 150 Ohio St.3d 571, 2017-Ohio~6873, 84 N.E.3d 1008. On appellant’s motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. On appellant’s motion to supplement the record on direct appeal or remand for an evidentiary hearing. Motion denied.

Donna J. Carr, J., of the Ninth District Court of Appeals, sitting for Fischer, J.

Eileen T. Gallagher, J., of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, sitting for DeWine, J.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3,700  | 19,523 | 12,512 | 53,342
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 36,922 | 65,865 | 69,583 | 72,856 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Eddiel ROSADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D17-529

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed January 5, 2018

Eddiel Rosado, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to Rosado filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State, 147 So.3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
No. 12-8193.

#### Jackson *v.*Georgia.

Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1799 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1799

                    For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO RETIRED PAY.

    (a) Entitlement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Joe 
W. Floyd of Holcomb, Mississippi, shall be entitled to retired pay 
under section 1331 of title 10, United States Code, as if such 
individual had completed 20 years of creditable service in the Army and 
the Army Reserve. Such individual shall submit an application for 
retired pay in accordance with subsection (b) of such section.
    (b) Applicability.--Retired pay shall be paid to the individual 
referred to in subsection (a) only for months beginning after the date 
of the application referred to in such subsection.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-8811.

#### Budziak *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-864.

#### Bormuth *v.*Dahlem Conservancy et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Decided November 17, 2016

#### Grace J., Matter of (Steven J.)

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 1166

denied
No. 12-7397.

#### James *v.*Texas.

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7730.

#### Jean-Phillipe *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        274,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,046
<CGS>                                            7,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               266,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (39)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (39)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (39)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, John E. Reed, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, Mestek, Inc., certify that: 

    1.                 I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended          September 30, 2005, of Mestek, Inc.(the “registrant”); 

    2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

    3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and          for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
SERVED: JANUARY 7, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

VINCENT R. BROWN 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED} 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0906 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on February 13,2013, inclusive, in the U.S. Tax Court: Room 2-1350, Federal 

Building and U.S. Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. 

Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: ·Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Vincent R. Brown 

5637 Glen Oaks Drive 

Rocklin, CA 95765 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-8275 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0906 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-4-
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF CHEMFIRST INC.


                                                          JURISDICTION OF
COMPANY NAME                                              ORGANIZATION

Burmar Chemical, Inc. ...................................  California
CEM Investment, Inc. ....................................  Mississippi
ChemFirst Electronic Materials L.P.......................  Delaware
(formerly, TriQuest, L.P.)
ChemFirst Electronic Materials Japan K K.................  Japan
(formerly, TriQuest Japan K K)
ChemFirst Foundation, Inc. ..............................  Mississippi
ChemFirst Texas, Inc. ...................................  Texas
EKC Technology, Inc. ....................................  California
EKC Technology International, Inc. ......................  California
EKC Technology K K ......................................  Japan
EKC Technology Limited ..................................  Scotland
FCC Acquisition Corporation .............................  California
FEC Marketing, Inc. .....................................  Texas
First Chemical Corporation ..............................  Mississippi
First Chemical Holdings, Inc. ...........................  Mississippi
First Chemical Texas, L.P. ..............................  Delaware
FRM International, Inc. .................................  U.S. Virgin Islands
FT Chemical, Inc. .......................................  Texas
Micropel, Inc. ..........................................  California
Mycosil, Inc. ...........................................  California