alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITY1110WestWashingtonStreet•Phoenix,Arizona85007(602)771-2300•www.azdeq.govHenryR.DarwinDirectorDEC192013Mr.JaredBlumenfeld,RegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,RegionIXMailCodeORA-l75HawthorneStreetSanFrancisco,CA94105RE:SubmittalofMaricopaCountyRule100revisingtheMaricopaCountyPortionoftheArizonaStateImplementationPlanforSection110(a)(2)InfrastructureDearMr.Blumenfeld:ConsistentwiththeprovisionsofArizonaRevisedStatutes§49-104,49-404,49-406,andtheCodeofFederalRegulations(CFR)Title40,§§51.102through51.104,theArizonaDepartmentofEnvironmentalQuality(ADEQ)herebyadoptsandsubmitstotheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)MaricopaCountyRule100,GeneralProvisionsAndDefinitions,adoptedSeptember25,2013,asarevisiontotheMaricopaCountyportionoftheArizonaStateImplementationPlan(SIP).ThisrevisionstrengthenstheexistingruleandsupersedestheversionofRule100thatwasoriginallysubmittedwiththeSIPsupplementlistedbelow(adoptedMarch15,2006).Rule100wasreferencedaspartofADEQ’sSIPsupplementtotheCleanAirActSections110(a)(1)and(2):Implementationof2006PM25NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards,1997PM2.5NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards,and19978-hourOzoneNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards,whichwassubmittedtotheEPAonAugust24,2012.ThissubmissioncorrectsthedeficienciesrequiredforCleanAirAct(CAA)Section110(a)(2)(e)(ii),whichspecifieshearingboardscompositionrequirements.Thesedeficiencieswereoutlinedin77FR66398(November5,2012).SouthernRegionalOffice400WestCongressStreet•Suite433•Tucson,AZ85701(520)628—6733JaniceK.BrewerGovernorPrintedonrecycledpaperMr.JaredBlumenfeldPage2of2TheSIPrevisionconsistsofadocumentdemonstratingthattherequirementsof40C.F.R.Part51AppendixVaresatisfied,theNoticeofProposedRulemaking(Appendix1),documentsshowingpublicprocesswascompleted(Appendices2through5),andtheFinalAdoptedVersionoftheRule(Appendix6),forEPAreviewandapproval.AhardcopyoftheSIPrevisionandanelectronicexactduplicateofthehardcopyonCDareincludedwiththisletter.Sincerely,Enclosures(2)cc:BillWiley,MaricopaCountyAirQualityDepartmentUrsulaKramer,PimaCountyDepartmentofEnvironmentalQualityDonGabrielson,PinalCountyAirQualityDepartmentColleenMcKaughan,EPARegionIXNoahSmith,EPARegionIXAirQuality
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, June 1, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13873 Filed 5-20-98; 12:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
# C_2010126EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5799 — Faurecia/Plastal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 126/01

On 24 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5799. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5799. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1804 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1804

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the disparity 
between civilian and military retiree cost-of-living adjustments caused 
           by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 25), 1994

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the disparity 
between civilian and military retiree cost-of-living adjustments caused 
           by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DISPARITY BETWEEN CIVILIAN AND MILITARY 
              RETIREE COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.

    Section 1401a(b)(6) of title 10, United States Code, (as added by 
section 2001 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (Public 
Law 103-66), is amended--
            (1) in the paragraph heading, strike out ``through 1998.--
        '' and inserting in lieu thereof ``through 1996.--'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking out the subparagraph heading and 
                inserting in lieu thereof ``fiscal years 1994 through 
                1996.--'';
                    (B) by striking out ``December 1, 1993,'' and 
                inserting in lieu thereof ``December 1 of 1993, 1994, 
                or 1995,''; and
                    (C) by striking out ``March 1994'' and inserting in 
                lieu thereof ``March of the following year'';
            (3) by striking out subparagraph (B); and
            (4) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B), 
        and in that subparagraph by striking out ``Subparagraphs (A) 
        and (B) do'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``Subparagraph (A) 
        does''.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2305-000]


Edgar Electric Cooperative Association d/b/a EnerStar Power 
Corp.; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 20, 1998.
    Edgar Electric Cooperative Association d/b/a EnerStar Power Corp. 
(EnerStar) filed an application for authorization to engage in the 
wholesale sale of capacity and energy at market-based rates, and for 
certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, EnerStar requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by 
EnerStar. On May 14, 1998, the Commission issued an Order Accepting For 
Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates And Granting Waiver Of Notice 
Requirement (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's May 14, 1998 Order granted the request for blanket 
approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in Ordering 
Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
EnerStar should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, EnerStar is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of EnerStar, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
EnerStar's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 15, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13934 Filed 5-26-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1355

 To amend chapter 91 of title 28, United States Code, to provide that 
 the United States Court of Federal Claims may have jurisdiction over 
            certain pending claims, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 4 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Heflin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend chapter 91 of title 28, United States Code, to provide that 
 the United States Court of Federal Claims may have jurisdiction over 
            certain pending claims, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OVER 
              CERTAIN PENDING CLAIMS.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 1500 of title 28, United States Code, is 
repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 91 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking out 
the item relating to section 1500.

                                 <all>
```
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

INTHEMATTEROFTHE 

### ) No.79718-2-I PERSONAL RESTRAINT OF: 

### ) ) DIVISION ONE DAVID WAYNE ELMER, 

### ) ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION Petitioner.

PER CURIAM. In 2011, David Elmer pleaded guiltyto five offenses in two separate cause numbers, Snohomish County Superior Cause Nos. 10-1-01883-7 and 11-1-00143-6. With respectto his convictions forsecond degree identity theft in both causes, the court imposed sentences of57 months ofconfinementto be followed by 12 months ofcommunity custody. In March 2019, Elmerfiled this personal restraint petition alleging, among otherthings, thatthe identitytheft sentences exceed the 5-yearstatutory maximum. See RCW 9.35.020(3); RCW 9A.20.021(1)(c). The State concedes
error. We acceptthe State’s concession and remand forthe trial courtto reduce the relevant community custodyterms so that Elmer’s total sentences do not exceed the statutory maximum. RCW 9.94A.701(9) See State v. Boyd, 174 Wn.2d 470, 275 P.3d 321 (2012); see ~so State v. Winborne, 167 Wn. App. 320, 329, 273 P.3d 454, review denied, 174

. 10 9 (2012). Forthe court: 

# AAJ I

4’
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|No chart available.                                            
|No chart available.                                            
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Florida Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8280.

#### McCarvill *v.*Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 28294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

7 CFR Parts 3015, 3016 and 3019

RIN 0503-AA16


Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative 
Agreements to State and Local Governments and Uniform Administrative 
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher 
Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations

AGENCY: Department of Agriculture, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 17, 1998, USDA published in the Federal Register 
(63 FR 7734) a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in which USDA 
proposed to revise its grants management regulations in order to bring 
the entitlement programs it administers under the same regulations that 
already apply to nonentitlement programs and identify exceptions to 
these general rules that apply only to entitlement programs. This 
document extends the comment period for that NPRM in order to give 
interested parties ample time to comment.

DATES: The period for written comments is extended from May 19, 1998 to 
June 18, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be mailed or faxed to Gerald Miske, 
Supervisory Management Analyst, Fiscal Policy Division, Office of the 
Chief Financial Officer, USDA, Room 3022 South Building, 1400 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250; FAX (202) 690-1529. 
Written comments may be inspected at the above address from 8:00 a.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. A copy of the Regulatory Cost/Benefit Assessment 
referenced in the Regulatory Impact Analysis section of this preamble 
can be obtained from Gerald Miske, Supervisory Management Analyst, 
Fiscal Policy Division, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, USDA, 
Room 3022 South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
D.C. 20250. This assessment may be examined at the same address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald Miske, Supervisory Management 
Analyst, Fiscal Policy Division, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, 
USDA, at the above address; telephone (202) 720-1553.

    Dated: May 19, 1998.
Sally Thompson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-13773 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-90-P
Exhibit 10.30


 


Letter of Consent


 


This Letter of Consent
is provided for the purpose of renewal of the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of November 17, 2007
by and between China Marine Food Group Limited, a Nevada corporation and Mr. Weipeng Liu, a Chinese citizen.


 


Both parties agree to
a renewal of the Agreement for a period of three years from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. All
terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


This Letter of Consent
is being issued this 1st day of January, 2011 at Dabao Industrial Zone, Shishi City, Fujian Province, China.


 


Signed by


 


	/s/ Marco Hon Wai Ku, Chief Financial Officer	 
	China Marine Food Group Limited	 
	 	 
	/s/ Weigeng Liu	 
	Mr. Weipeng Liu
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,888
<SECURITIES>                                     4,972
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                       724
<INVENTORY>                                      1,181
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,111
<PP&E>                                           3,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,346
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48,521)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,798
<SALES>                                         11,665
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,665
<CGS>                                            6,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.92)



</TABLE>
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 392ND DISTRIC T COURT OF HENDERSON COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 27th

day of February, 2015 , t he cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LESLIE S UE FLOYD AND BRADLEY

DEAN CODY AND IN THE INTEREST OF BILLY DE AN CODY, A CHILD , Appellant

NO. 12

- 15

- 00025

- CV; Trial Court No. 2014B

- 0692

By per curi am opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this the 28 th day of April , 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Bezjak v. Diamond

08/30/2016

165 WAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 135 A.3d 623