alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00046-CV 

JAMES COPE APPELLANT

V.

ANGELA COPE APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF JACK COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 14-01-005

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On May 28, 2015, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within 

ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: July 16, 2015
No. 12-8048 (12A795).

#### Hill *v.*Humphrey, Warden.

Super. Ct. Butts County, Ga. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12-1


             MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                           (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Twelve Months Ended  Twelve Months Ended  Twelve Months Ended
                                         -------------------  -------------------  -------------------
                                            March 31, 1997     December 31, 1996    December 31, 1995
                                         -------------------  -------------------  -------------------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>                  <C>
EARNINGS AS DEFINED (1)
Pre-tax income (2) ......................        $107,832         $122,239             $112 727
Fixed charges ...........................          55,011           53,831               45,637
                                                 --------         --------             --------
 Earnings as defined                             $162,843         $176,070             $158,364
                                                 ========         ========             ========

FIXED CHARGES AS DEFINED (1)
Interest on long-term debt ..............        $ 44,364         $ 43,163             $ 35,820
Interest on other borrowed funds ........           8,068            8,012                7,053
Amortization of debt discounts, premium
 and expense ............................           1,087            1,081                  996
Interest implicit in rentals (3) ........           1,492            1,575                1,768
                                                 --------         --------             --------
 Fixed charges as defined ...............        $ 55,011         $ 53,831             $ 45,637
                                                 ========         ========             ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges ......            2.96             3.27                 3.47
                                                 ========         ========             ========
</TABLE>



Notes:
(1)  Earnings and fixed charges are defined and computed in accordance with
     Item 503 of Regulation S-K.
(2)  This amount represents the aggregate of (a) the pre-tax income of
     MichCon, (b) MichCon's share of pre-tax income of its 50% owned
     companies and (c) any income actually received from less than 50% owned
     companies.
(3)  This amount is estimated to be a reasonable approximation of the
     interest portion of rentals.

MichCon is a guarantor of certain other debt.  Fixed charges related to such
debt are deemed to be immaterial and therefore have been excluded from the 
above ratios.
Stock Option Cancellation Agreement



 Exhibit 10.52 
 STOCK OPTION CANCELLATION AGREEMENT 
 This Stock Option Agreement is made and entered into between Cadmus
Communications Corporation, a Virginia corporation (“Corporation”), and Stephen E. Hare (“Hare”). 
 The Corporation has
offered to pay Hare the aggregate sum of $177,450 in return for the cancellation of all of the below listed outstanding stock options for shares of the common stock of the Corporation held by Hare (the “Options”, with one Option
representing the right to purchase one share of common stock of the Corporation): 
  

						
	 Option Agreement Date
	  	 Exercise
 Price
	  	 Number of Options
 Outstanding

	5/9/2002	  	$	12.56	  	15,700
	 5/13/2003
	  	$	9.48	  	7,500

 Hare hereby accepts the Corporation’s offer subject to the terms as provided in this
Agreement. 
 The aggregate consideration due will be paid in cash (payable by check delivered to or mailed to Hare unless other payment
arrangements have been agreed to by the Corporation), less any applicable tax withholding, within five (5) business days after receipt of this duly completed and executed Agreement and the Option Agreement(s) relating to the Options, provided
such receipt by the Corporation occurs by April 15, 2006. 
 Hare agrees that none of such consideration shall be considered part of
Hare’s salary, bonus or other compensation for any compensation related purpose or benefit other than required public disclosure. 
 Hare hereby represents and warrants that, subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable Option Agreement(s), he has full and unencumbered legal title to the Options and full right, power and authority to agree to the cancellation of
the same and to return them to the Corporation with the approval of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee. 
 Hare certifies that
his Tax Identification Number on record with the Corporation is accurate and that he is not subject to backup tax withholding under the Internal Revenue Code. 
 Subject to receipt of aggregate consideration due as described above, Hare hereby transfers and agrees to the cancellation of all of his right, title and interest in the Options to the Corporation on the foregoing
terms and conditions and agrees that he will have no further rights thereto or thereunder. 
  

					
	Date: 3/30/06	 	Signature:	 	 /s/ Stephen E. Hare

		 		 	Stephen E. Hare
			
	Date: 4/6/06	 	Signature:	 	 /s/ Bruce V. Thomas

		 		 	Its
		 		 	For Cadmus Communications Corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8520

JOSEPH J. PAVLICO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-87-60, CA-95-308-P)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph J. Pavlico, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pavlico v. United

States, Nos. CR-87-60; CA-95-308-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2








SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350


I, A.
Bruce O’Connor, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic
report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said
periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period
covered by said periodic report.













/s/ A. Bruce
      O’ConnorA.
      Bruce O’ConnorChief
      Financial Officer








Date:   May
6, 2010














A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 12-427.

#### Crystal Dunes Owners’ Assn., Inc., et al. *v.*City of Destin, Florida, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2010283EN.01002301.xml

| 29.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 283/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 283/23

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 971/2010

of 28 October 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Vastedda della valle del Belìce (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and the designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Vastedda della valle del Belìce’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Vastedda della valle del Belìce’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 42, 19.2.2010, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY

Vastedda della valle del Belìce (PDO)

---
#### PICARELLA, C., Jr. v. MCCARTHY, M.

104 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/21/2017

CV-16-2173, (Northumberland)

Affirmed
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 Name
    
    Jurisdiction of OrganizationERT Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareeRT Investment Corporation
    
    DelawareeRT Tech Corporation
    
    DelawareCovance Cardiac Safety Services Inc.
    
    PennsylvaniaeResearchTechnology Limited
    
    United KingdomeResearchTechnology UK 1 Limited
    
    United KingdomeResearchTechnology UK 2 Limited
    
    United KingdomeResearchTechnology GmbH
    
    GermanyBiosigna GmbH
    
    GermanyeResearchTechnology Europe GmbH
    
    GermanyeResearchTechnology Germany GmbH & Co. KG
    
    Germany
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 (the Report), I, Kendra A. Borrego, Chief Financial Officer of IMPAC Medical
Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|December 14, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    KENDRA A. BORREGO
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Kendra A. Borrego      
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Structure Tek Constr., Inc. v Waterville Holdings, LLC

2d Dept: 140 AD3d 1151

denied
No. 12-7373.

#### Morgan *v.*Marshall, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         101,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,578
<PP&E>                                          12,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,228
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       557,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (416,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,007
<SALES>                                        286,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               286,751
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  458,620
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (171,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (171,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (171,869)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)



</TABLE>
No. 12-7951.

#### Somerville *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2019

No. 04-18-00810-CR

Dorothy Jackson HAYNES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR2226

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O RDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on December 27, 2018. Neither the brief 

nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed. On January 3, 2019, this court 

ordered appellant to respond by no later than January 14, 2019, state a reasonable explanation for 

failing to timely file the brief, and demonstrate the steps being taken to remedy the deficiency. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Appellant was advised that failure to provide an adequate 

response would result in this appeal being abated to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. 

See id. No response was filed. 

Upon further review of the record, it appears the trial court permitted appellant’s counsel 

to withdraw on November 2, 2018. It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED to the 

trial court. See id. The trial court is ORDERED to determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute this appeal and, if appellant is indigent, appoint new appellate counsel. The trial court 

is further ORDERED to cause the trial court clerk to file, within thirty (30) days from the date of 

this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings regarding 

appellant’s indigency and any order appointing new appellate counsel. All filing deadlines are 

suspended until further order from this court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0     | Year-1     | Year-2     | Year-3     | Year-4     | Year-5     | Year-6     | Year-7     | Year-8     | Year-9    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ----------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |            |            |            |            |            |            |            | 1,990,145  | 2,869,960  | 3,958,315 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,817,122  | 8,500,983  | 10,532,858 | 11,932,524 | 13,974,936 | 15,819,319 | 17,847,539 | 19,927,602 | 23,977,248 | 27,840,830
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 28,900,038 | 30,360,342 | 32,512,291 |            |            |            |            |            |            |           
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
No. 12-8272.

#### Holiday *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               BD
<CIK>                           0000065596
<NAME>              SIEBERT FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                             USD
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                           7,417,039
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,522,722
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                      0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>              3,870,848
<PP&E>                             606,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  18,986,788
<SHORT-TERM>                             0
<PAYABLES>                               0
<REPOS-SOLD>                             0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                      0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                 638,460
<LONG-TERM>                      3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                           210,049
<OTHER-SE>                      12,732,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    12,942,649
<TRADING-REVENUE>                5,611,881
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>               217,415
<COMMISSIONS>                    4,696,669
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>       77,161
<FEE-REVENUE>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  75,251
<COMPENSATION>                   1,388,736
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  1,903,629
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>       1,903,629
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     1,074,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .05
        


</TABLE>
No. D-2648.

#### In re Disbarment of Goldblatt.

[For earlier order herein, see 566 U. S. 933.]

Disbarment entered.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-156-007]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request for Extension 
of Time

May 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 30, 1998, Viking Gas Transmission Company 
(Viking) filed for an extension of implementation dates for computer-
related capacity release GISB standards.
    Viking requests the Commission to grant Viking an extension of time 
to June 1, 1999, to implement the computer-related capacity release 
GISB standards. Viking says it needs additional time to test and to 
implement its capacity release computer components. Viking claims its 
ability to test and to implement its capacity release computer 
components has been delayed due to complications that arose in 
conjunction with its conversion to an Internet-based EBB in place of a 
dial-up EBB.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
on or before May 22, 1998. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13488 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M