alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frank Liddy et al., Respondents, v Vincent DeStaso et al., Defendants, and State of New York et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 406]

In an action to recover for damage to real property, the defendants State of New York and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J), dated July 9, 2002, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 325 (a) to remove the action to the Court of Claims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

*793The law is well settled that the proper forum for an action against the State which seeks money damages only is the Court of Claims *(see Matter of Gross v Perales,*72 NY2d 231, 235 [1988]; *Nominee Realty v State of New York,*233 AD2d 426, 427 [1996]).

The Supreme Court may transfer actions brought therein to any other court, including the Court of Claims, having jurisdiction over the subject matter *(see*CPLR 325 [a]; NY Const, art VI, § 19 [a]; *State of New York v Jacobs,*167 AD2d 876, 877 [1990]). The July 9, 2002, order did not, however, address the issue of whether the plaintiffs satisfied that court’s jurisdictional prerequisites *(see Wynne v DeStaso,*2 AD3d 841 [2003] [decided herewith]; *cf. State of New York v Dewey,*260 AD2d 924 [1999]; *Nish v Town of Poestenkill,*179 AD2d 929, 930 [1992], *appeal dismissed*79 NY2d 1040 [1992]). Therefore, the appropriate forum to make that determination is the Court of Claims. Goldstein, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 2,830  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 21

- 3909

_____________________________
S YED I BRAHIM H USSAIN a nd S YED M UHAMMAD B AQIR H USSAIN , Appellant s ,

v.

P RIME I NTERNATIONAL P ROPERTIES D UVAL , LLC
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Clay County

. Timothy R. Collins , Judge

. September 9, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , C.J., and M AKAR and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Syed Ibrahim Hussain and Syed Muhammad Baqir Hussain, pro

se , Appellant s

. Jerry L. Sessions, II
, Jacksonville, for Appellee.
#### Com. v. Purvis 28

12/29/2015

590 EAL (2015)

28

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied
No. 12-7777.

#### Orris *v.*Buchanan, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,301
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 78,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,478
<INVENTORY>                                   71,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             158,378
<PP&E>                                       143,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                67,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               306,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        144,309
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         479
<OTHER-SE>                                   156,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 306,684
<SALES>                                      114,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             115,132
<CGS>                                         83,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 84,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (99)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,034
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .46


</TABLE>
No. 12-7504.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
July 11, 2012

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SNAP Document Control Officer 1310 L Street NW ioth Floor (MC 6205J) Washington, DC 20005 Dear Sir/Madam: Reference: [



### On behalf of [ ], confidential and public copies of the subject SNAP Information Notice were submitted under the Significant New Alternatives Policy program for Agency review (see Section 612 

### of the CAA) on June 22, 2012. [

Please note that we wish to claim portions of this communication as Confidential Business Information (CBI) and substantiation of these CBI claims is provided as an attachment in the original SNAP notice.

Please contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification. Sincerely, 

# C I

Via Federal Express
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1495 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1495

   To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for 
                   business meals and entertainment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 28 (legislative day, September 27), 1993

Mr. Inouye (for himself, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Reid, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Coats, Mr. 
 D'Amato, Mr. Durenberger, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Johnston, 
Mr. Wallop, and Mr. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for 
                   business meals and entertainment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 13209 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 
1993 is hereby repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be 
applied and administered as if such section had not been enacted.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall apply to taxable years 
beginning after December 31, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
15.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS








We hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report dated June 29, 2010 on audit of
consolidated financial statements of Highway Holdings Limited and subsidiaries
for year ended March 31, 2010 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Highway
Holdings Limited for the year ended March 31, 2010 to be filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission on or about June 29, 2010, and the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statements 333-13320, No. 333-10312
and No. 333-132736 already filed.








AGCA,
Inc.


Arcadia,
California


June 29,
2010
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.13

                               SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


     It is agreed as follows between Somnus Medical Technologies, Inc.
("Company") and Eric N. Doelling ("Doelling") as of October 21, 1998:

     1. Notwithstanding any terms to the contrary in any prior agreements
between the Company and Doelling, the following terms shall govern Doelling's
right to salary, benefits or other compensation in the event of the termination
of his employment with the Company, whether the termination is voluntary or
involuntary, for cause or without cause. Other existing terms of the parties'
employment relationship shall remain in effect.

     2.  Doelling's salary shall continue for one year from the date of
termination, subject to applicable withholdings.

     3.  Doelling's stock options shall be fully vested as of the date of
termination.

     4. Doelling shall for one year after termination be reimbursed whatever
amounts he may be required to pay to continue his insurance coverage under
COBRA.

     5.  Doelling shall be entitled to keep the Company computer and related
equipment which is at his home.


COMPANY


By:  /s/ Stuart D. Edwards            /s/ Eric N. Doelling
     Stuart Edwards                   ERIC N. DOELLING
     President/CEO

                                                                      10/21/98
OMB Control No. 2060-0336

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL OPERATING PERMIT, 40 CFR PART 71

FORM PTE - POTENTIAL TO EMIT SUMMARY

INSTRUCTIONS: Complete this form once for the facility. You may find it helpful to complete form EMISS for each emissions unit before 

completing this form. For each emissions unit with emissions that count towards applicability, list the emissions unit ID and the 

PTE for the air pollutants listed below. If there are other air pollutants not listed below for which the source is a major source, 

provide attachments naming the air pollutant and showing calculation of the total for that pollutant. Round values to the 

nearest tenth of a ton. Add all values together in each column and enter the total in the space provided at the bottom of the 

table. Also report these totals in section J of form GIS.

Emissions Unit ID Regulated Air Pollutants and Pollutants for which the Source is Major 

NOx

(tons/yr)

VOC

(tons/yr)

SO2

(tons/yr)

PM10

(tons/yr)

CO

(tons/yr)

Lead

(tons/yr)

HAP

(tons/yr)

Tank 60 0.0512 4.98E-05

Tank 300 0.0287 2.71E-05

Tank 302 0.1894 1.84E-04

Tank 304 0.0567 5.45E-05

Tank 306 0.0993 9.59E-05

Tank 308 0.2218 2.14E-04

Tank 310 0.2569 2.84E-04

Tank 312 0.3517 3.42E-04

Tank 314 0.2117 2.05E-04

Bulk Solids Storage 2.56 0.0188

Fugitive Equipment Leaks 0.0738 0.0001

Boiler 1 4.51 0.248 0.027 0.343 3.79

Emergency Generator #1 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071

Emergency Generator #2 0.441 0.035 0.029 0.031 0.095 0.0071

TOTALS 74.99 16.33 66.79 13.15 31.04 0.0968 29.44
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          21,303
<SECURITIES>                                    12,252
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,700)
<INVENTORY>                                     40,021
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,613
<PP&E>                                          33,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,491
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,093
<SALES>                                         48,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,818
<CGS>                                           20,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,515
[OTHER-INCOME]                                     106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-8255.

#### Jaimez Reyes *v.*Kane, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Harrison Tsosie 

Attorney General 

Navajo Nation 

P.O. Box 2010 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

SEP 1 12014 

Window Rock, Navajo Nation Arizona 86515 

Dear Mr. Tsosie: 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Thank you for your lette r of August 15,2014, to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator 

Gina McCarthy on the upcoming supplemental proposal to the Clean Power Plan that will cover existing 

power plants in Indian country and U.S. Territories. The Administrator has asked that I respond on her 

behalf. 

ln your letter you ask that the EPA refrain from releasing a supplemental proposal for Indian country 

until the Navajo Nation has conducted its consultation with the EPA on September 15, 2014. In addition, 

you asked that the supplemental proposal not be published until the EPA has had the opportunity to 

meaningfully reflect on and incorporate the Nation's comments into the rulemaking package. As you 

know, the President established an expeditious schedule for the EPA to complete this important 

rulemaking, so we anticipate releasing the supplemental proposal relatively soon. That being said, 

however, your efforts to develop a comprehensive statement of your views wi ll be helpful as we move 

forward on the supplemental proposal addressing existing power plants in Indian country. The 

supplemental proposal will not be published until after we have considered the input from the 

consultation with the Navajo Nation on September 15, 2014. It is important to understand that we do not 

view this consultation as your only opportunity to engage with us on the supplemental proposal. We are 

committed to an ongoing dialogue throughout the rulemaking process, including offering additional 

consultation during the public comment period on the supplemental proposal. 

Again, thank you for your letter. I am looking forward to our discussion on September 15, 2014. 

Sincerely, 

Janet G. McCabe 

Acting Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Rank Group Plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of Ranks knowledge:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: June 25, 2004 |  | /S/ MIKE SMITH         
|                    |  | Name: Mike Smith       
|                    |  | Title: Chief Executive 
|                    | 
|Date: June 25, 2004 |  | /S/ IAN DYSON          
|                    |  | Name: Ian Dyson        
|                    |  | Title: Finance Director
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Banco Macro S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 28, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ Jorge Pablo Brito
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Jorge Pablo Brito      
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Banco Macro S.A. and will be
retained by Banco Macro S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Gerard Gabel

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 81 5

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 10

- 74676

Trial court: 312 th District Court of Harris County

Relator, Gerard Gabel , has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. The Court

requests a response to the petition from the real party in interest. The response, if any, is

due to be filed with this Court no later than 20 days of the date of this order.

I t is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____ /s/ Evelyn V . Keyes

______________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ____ December 17, 2020

____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BT REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY>US DOLLARS 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,150
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,500,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                      9,044
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,450,511
<PP&E>                                         448,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 267,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,049,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,595,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,842
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,281,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,049,180
<SALES>                                      3,410,256
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,410,256
<CGS>                                        2,410,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,890,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             412,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,302,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,302,150)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.89)
        

</TABLE>
#### Cory MINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D14-2766

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 19, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12014060CF10A.

Affirmed,