alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010125EN.01002601.xml

| 21.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 434/2010

of 20 May 2010

granting no export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 619/2008

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 164(2), in conjunction with Article 4, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 619/2008 of 27 June 2008 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds concerning certain milk products (2) provides for a standing invitation to tender procedure.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 18 May 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1454/2007 of 10 December 2007 laying down common rules for establishing a tender procedure for fixing export refunds for certain agricultural products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 18 May 2010.

| (3) | The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its Chair,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the standing invitation to tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 619/2008, for the tendering period ending on 18 May 2010, no export refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in point (c) of Article 1 and in Article 2 respectively of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 21 May 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 May 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 168, 28.6.2008, p. 20.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 325, 11.12.2007, p. 69.

3

---
No. 12-408.

#### Edwards *v.*DeWalt, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
APPENDIX C:

Prenotification Letter

DATE

NAME

ADDR1

ADDR2 CITY, ST ZIP

Dear NAME:

I am contacting you on behalf of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), a government agency established by Congress to protect consumers and help financial markets work for both consumers and firms.

The CFPB has contracted with ICF Intern ational to conduct a national, voluntary telephone survey, where they will ask consumers about specific types of consumer financial products. The survey is part of a study that was authorized by Congress

under the Dodd

- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. I am sending you this letter to notify you that an interviewer from ICF International will be calling you in the near future to request that a member of your household participate in the survey.

Your household’s participation in this surv ey would be a big help to the CFPB in its continuing efforts to get consumers the information they need to make financial decisions they believe are best for themselves and their families. I hope you will agree to participate.

The interview takes only ab out 10 minutes to complete.

The survey is completely voluntary and responses will remain private except where required by law . ICF will not share your identity or contact information with the CFPB or any other party. The person being interviewed doesn’t have to answer any questions that he or she doesn’t want to answer. If you would like to participate in the survey and require an accommodation to participate, please contact us at CFPB_504Request@CFPB.gov.

The CFPB has placed a link on its home page [W EBSITE] where prospective survey participants can confirm this is a government

- sponsored survey. The survey has been reviewed and approved by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. The

OMB control number is: 3170

- XXXX, which expires on [DATE].

Sincer ely,
No. 12-7770.

#### Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-8096.

#### Rendon-Martinez *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: RELOCATION OF 

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 23-1-03 

WITHIN THE TWENTY-THIRD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

NO. 433

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the Petition for 

Relocation of Magisterial District Court 23-1-03 within the Twenty-third Judicial District 

(Berks County) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND 

DECREED that the Petition, which provides for the relocation of Magisterial District 23-1-

03 to the Berks County Services Center, located at 633 Court Street, Reading 

Pennsylvania, outside of the boundaries of the magisterial district from which the judge is

elected, is granted. This Order is effective July 1, 2019.
No. 12-8039.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT
13.1





Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Highway Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roland W. Kohl,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.







Dated:
November 13, 2009




/s/ Roland W.
Kohl


Roland W.
Kohl


Chief
Executive Officer
#### Vincent PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.
January 4, 2013

No. 11-1425.

#### Missouri *v.*McNeely.

Sup. Ct. Mo. [Certio-rari granted, 567 U. S. 968.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
#### COM. v. HYNSON, J.

1037 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

CP-51-CR-0001272-2015

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
From: gthomas@bp.Guardian.com

To: Hancy, Cindy Wang

Cc: Reeves, David; Susan Fairchild

Subject: Re: HAP Test Data Sent to EPA

Date: Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:35:21 PM

Ms. Hancy,

Yes, HAP/Phenolic Binder was used in each of these plants when testing was

conducted.

Kind regards,

Grover Thomas

Guardian Fiberglass, Inc.

 

 "Hancy, Cindy 

 Wang" 

 <chancy@rti.org> To

 <gthomas@bp.Guardian.com> 

 03/15/2012 02:29 cc

 PM "Susan Fairchild" 

 <Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov>,

 "Reeves, David" <dwreeves@rti.org>

 Subject

 HAP Test Data Sent to EPA 

 

Mr. Thomas,

RTI is one of the contractors assisting EPA with the wool fiberglass

NESHAP. After reviewing the formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol results of

Guardian facilities, we would like to verify whether the testing below was

completed while the bonded lines were running a HAP/Phenolic Binder.

Guardian Kingman – Testing performed 10/2005

Guardian Inwood – Testing Performed 11/2007

Guardian Albion – Testing performed 5/2008

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Cindy Wang Hancy

RTI International

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-6623
Fax: (919) 316-3420
##### 



MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three MonthsEnded March 31
    
    
    Twelve Months Ended December 31(Millions of Dollars)
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings:Pretax earnings
    
    $
    68
    
    
    $
    (1
    )
    
    $
    10
    
    
    $
    45
    
    
    $
    32
    
    
    $
    (66
    )Adjustments
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    (3
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Fixed charges
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    59
    
    
    
    59
    
    
    
    58
    
    
    
    62
    
    
    
    61Net earnings
    
    $
    84
    
    
    $
    60
    
    
    $
    66
    
    
    $
    103
    
    
    $
    94
    
    
    $
    (5
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    17
    
    
    $
    57
    
    
    $
    57
    
    
    $
    57
    
    
    $
    60
    
    
    $
    59Adjustments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    2Fixed charges
    
    $
    17
    
    
    $
    59
    
    
    $
    59
    
    
    $
    58
    
    
    $
    62
    
    
    $
    61Ratio of earnings to
fixed charges
    
    
    4.94
    
    
    
    1.02
    
    
    
    1.12
    
    
    
    1.77
    
    
    
    1.53
    
    
    $
    (66
    )
 
 (1)
    
    The earnings for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2001 were not adequate to
cover fixed charges. The amount of the deficiency was $66,432,000. The Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges excluding unusual charges would have been 1.62.
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 11.68  | 5.12   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           BD


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             30,209,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                       1,648,000
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                         0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                                 4,480,000
<PP&E>                                              1,494,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     39,924,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                                0
<PAYABLES>                                          3,973,000
<REPOS-SOLD>                                                0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                         0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                      4,000
<LONG-TERM>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                              229,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         35,718,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       39,924,000
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                     552,000
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                1,369,000
<COMMISSIONS>                                      31,139,000
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                       1,518,000
<FEE-REVENUE>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     14,000
<COMPENSATION>                                      9,014,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    11,566,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         11,566,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                        6,714,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             .29



</TABLE>
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Pakistan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Pakistan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 3,222  | 3,251 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3,678  | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14282]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 22, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. RVB Bancshares, Inc., Russellville, Arkansas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the votings shares of River 
Valley Bank, Russellville, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 26, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-14282 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14204]



[[Page 29391]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2870-000]


UNITIL Power Corp.; Notice of Filing

May 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1998, UNITIL Power Corp. tendered for 
filing pursuant to Schedule II Section H of Supplement No. 1 to Rate 
Schedule FERC Number 1, the UNITIL System Agreement, the following 
material:
    1. Statement of all sales and billing transactions for the period 
January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1997 along with the actual costs 
incurred by UNITIL Power Corp. by FERC account.
    2. UNITIL Power Corp. Rates billed from January 1, 1997 to December 
1997 and supporting rate development.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest such filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
and protests should be filed on or before May 29, 1998. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14204 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-7793.

#### Collins *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Rochdale Village, Inc., Respondent, v Howard L. Zimmerman et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 386]

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for architectural malpractice, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dollard, J.), dated October 31, 2002, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, or alternatively, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint or for partial summary judgment limiting the plaintiffs recovery, if any, to the fees it paid under the contract.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“[O]n a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the court must determine whether, accepting as true the factual averments of the complaint and according the plaintiff the benefits of all favorable inferences which may be drawn therefrom, the plaintiff can succeed upon any reasonable view of the facts stated” *(Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of New Rochelle v County of Westchester,*282 AD2d 561, 562 [2001]). Where evidence is submitted by the movant in support of the CPLR 3211 (a) (7) motion, the court must determine whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action, not whether he or she has stated one *(see Columbo v Chase Manhattan Automotive Fin. Corp.,*297 AD2d 327 [2002]).

Applying these principles to the case at bar, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for partial summary judgment limiting the plaintiffs recovery, if any, to the fees paid by the plaintiff to the defendants under their contract, as the defendants failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on this issue *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]).

The defendants’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.