alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 13, 2006/s/ Dennis J. StevermerDennis J. StevermerChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 15.1



McMoRan Exploration Co.

1615 Poydras St.

New Orleans, La. 70112



August 4, 2004



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of McMoRan Exploration Co.:



We are aware of the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (File Nos.
333-95195 and 333-108408) and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-57484, 333-67485, 333-87380,
333-90170, 333-105533 and
333-115335) of  McMoRan
Exploration Co. of our report dated August 4, 2004 relating to the unaudited
condensed interim financial statements of McMoRan Exploration Co. that is
included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.







Very truly yours,



/s/Ernst & Young LLP
EX-35 (c)
(logo) HOME LOAN
       SERVICES


FORM OF ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


March 1, 2007
HSI Asset Securitization Corporation
Attention: Head MBS Principal Finance
452 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10018

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
as Securities Administrator and Master Servicer
Attention: Corporate Trust Services - FFMLT 2006-FF1
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045


RE:  Annual officer's certificate delivered pursuant to Section 3.24 of that
     certain Pooling Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2006 (the
     "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among HSI Asset Securitization
     Corporation, as depositor (the "Depositor"), National City Home Loan
     Services, Inc., as Servicer, First Franklin Financial Corporation, as
     Mortgage Loan Seller, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as master servicer
     (the "Master Servicer"), and securities administrator
     (the "Securities Administrator"), and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
     as trustee (the "Trustee")

Steven A. Baranet, the undersigned, a duly authorized Vice President of Home
Loan Services, Inc., f/k/a National City Home Loan Services, Inc. (the
"Servicer") does hereby certify the following for the calendar year ending on
December 31, 2006:

1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
     year and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been
     made under my supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the servicer has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
     respects throughout such year or, if there has been a failure to fulfill
     any such obligation in any material respect, I have specifically identified
     to the Depositor and the Master Servicer each such failure known to me and
     the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken by the
     Servicer to remedy such default.

Certified By:


/s/ Steven A. Baranet
Name: Steven A. Baranet
Title: Vice president

Loan Services
P.O. Box 1838
Pittsburgh, PA 15230-1838

(logo) Merrill Lynch
Home Loan Services is a subsidiary
of Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust Co., FSB

(logo) EQUAL HOUSING
       LENDER
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1613

To amend the Three Affiliated Tribes and Standing Rock Sioux Tribe

Equitable Compensation Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1993

Mr. CONRAD (for himself and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To amend the Three Affiliated Tribes and Standing Rock

Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS.

4 (a) TIME EXTENSION.—Section 3508(d)(1) and sec5 tion 3509(c)(1) of the Three Affiliated Tribes and Stand6 ing Rock Sioux Tribe Equitable Compensation Act (title

7 XXXV; Public Law 102–575; 106 Stat. 4731) are each

8 amended by deleting ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting in lieu thereof

9 in each such section ‘‘twenty-six months’’.
2

S 1613 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall be considered as having taken effect

3 October 30, 1992.

Æ
RICH FITZGERALD COUNTY EXECUTIVE 

# COUNTYOF 

# ALLEGHENY

May 14, 2014 Ms. Joyce Epps, Director Department of Environmental Protection Bureau ofAir Quality Rachel Carson Building 400 Market Street, P
.O
. Box 8468 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468 Dear Ms. Epps: We are pleased to enclose one paper copy and an exact duplicate ofthis paper copy on DVD in searchable pdf file format of a supplement to Allegheny County's portion ofthe Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment ofthe 2006 PMl.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for the Liberty-Clairton area. This SIP revision is being tracked as our Revision Tracking Number 75. The primary SIP document was submitted to you on May 16, 2013. This enclosed document serves as a supplement to that SIP submittal, addressing transportation conformity and electric generating unit (EGU) emissions. Note that at the time ofthe development ofthe SIP and the supplement, the CrossState Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) was under review at the u.S. Supreme Court. The Court has since ruled in favor ofthe CSAPR rule, supporting the emissions inventories used for the attainment demonstration
. We request that the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection approve this supplemental revision and forward it to the u.s. EPA Region III with a recommendation for approval. Please contact me ifyou have any questions
. Sincerely,

# q~**~~** Manager, ACHD Air Quality Program
cc: Kirit Dalal, PA DEP Central Office Stephen Hepler, PA DEP SW Regional Office Enclosures PM l .5 Supplemental SIP and Appendices

A LLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT' AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 30 1**39 ~H**  STREET BUILDING #7 • PITISBURGH. PA 15201 -1 81 1 PHONE (41 2) 578-8103 • FAX (41 2) 578-8144
No. 11-1414.

#### Diaz-Palmerin *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of March {Date}, 2010 (this Amendment), to the Executive Termination Agreement
(the Executive Termination Agreement) between Millipore Corporation (the Company) and {Name} (the Executive), dated as of {Date}.

WHEREAS, the Executive Termination Agreement provides for certain payments and benefits to the Executive upon certain terminations of
employment following a Change of Control (as defined in the Executive Termination Agreement), subject to certain conditions, as well as the Executive having complied with certain commitments; and

WHEREAS, in order to enhance the retentive value of the Executive Termination Agreement, the Company desires to amend such agreement to
provide that while the Executive will remain obligated to use best efforts to bring about whatever result the Board of Directors of the Company determines to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders relative to any Impending
Change of Control (as defined in the Executive Termination Agreement) and to use best efforts at and after the occurrence of a Change of Control to effect an orderly transition of control to the acquiror, the receipt of severance payments and
benefits under the Executive Termination Agreement will not be subject to the Executives compliance with such covenants;

NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that, Section 7.01 of the Executive Termination Agreement is hereby amended to provide that
the words Sections 3.01 and 3.02 are hereby replaced with Section 3.01.

Intending to be legally bound hereby,
the parties have executed this Amendment on the dates set forth next to their names below.



|                   |  |  |  |                        |  |  |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  |  |  | 
|March {Date}, 2010 |  |  |  | MILLIPORE CORPORATION,
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | by                     |  | 
|                   |  | 
|March {Date}, 2010 |  |  |  | EXECUTIVE,            
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | by                     |  |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Dominy, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 696]

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered February 8, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a sentence of eight years and five years of postrelease *902supervision. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.E, Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
#### Westerman v. W.C.A.B. (K-Mart Corp.)

10/07/2015

389 MAL (2015)

Denied
Exhibit 32.2

                                  Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lottery & Wagering Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Miles R. Greenberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ Miles R. Greenberg
                                               -----------------------
                                               Miles R. Greenberg
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               October 12 , 2004
2017-1638.

#### Cleveland v. Giering.

Cuyahoga App. No. 105020, 2017-0hio-8059. On appellee’s motion to strike. Motion denied. Appellee may file a memorandum in response to jurisdiction no later than January 2, 2018.
#### Wilhelm Group, Respondent, v White Plains Flooring & Supplies, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[767 NYS2d 836]

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a commercial *439lease, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), dated November 18, 2002, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ belated motion for summary judgment as untimely (see CPLR 3212 [a]; *Olzaski v Locust Val. Cent. School Dist.,*256 AD2d 320 [1998]; *cf. Chambers v Maury Povich Show,*285 AD2d 440 [2001]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | 15.99  | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.97   | 7.74   | 9.31   | 6.28   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
AGCA, Inc.Certified Public Accountants











June 29, 2011





Security and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N. E.


Washington, D.C. 20549-7561





Dear Sirs:





HIGHWAY HOLDINGS LIMITED


CIK#0001026785





We have read the information required by Item 16F of Form 20-F dated June 29, 2011 of Highway Holdings Limited, and have the following comments:





1.
We agree with the statements made in the paragraphs 2 and 3 in the Section “Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountants”.





2.
We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the other statements of the registrant contained therein.





Yours faithfully,







/s/ AGCA, Inc.





Arcadia, California





735 W. Duarte Road, Suite 203, Arcadia, CA 91006
 Phone: (626) 446-4000·Fax: (626) 446-4002·E-mail:info@agcacpa.com
NO. 07-06-0249-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 4, 2007

______________________________

BRIAN EVERETT BRANDON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 108 DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; TH

NO. 48,036-E; HONORABLE ABE LOPEZ, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was placed on deferred adjudication for a period of 10 years after entering

a plea of guilty, pursuant to a plea bargain, to the offense of aggravated kidnapping. The

State subsequently filed a motion to proceed with adjudication alleging that appellant

committed the new offense of assault. The trial court subsequently conducted a hearing

and found the appellant guilty of aggravated kidnapping and, after receiving evidence

regarding punishment, assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for a period of 15 years. We affirm.
2

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion

to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion,

the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id. at 744-

45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel

has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial

court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy

of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right

to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

(Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se

response. Although, appellant requested and was granted an extension of time to file a

pro se response, appellant has not filed a response.

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal,

but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an

independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable

grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346,

102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We

have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a 1

copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant’s right to file a

pro se petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.

3

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.1

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
No. 12-7816.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134973 & (16) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134973 COA: 279030 Oakland CC: 06-208406-FH JAMES HOWARD WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 24, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED.

l1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
Order entered September 10, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00362-CR

No. 05-18-00363-CR

No. 05-18-00364-CR

JOHN F. SEAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F17-44837-P, F17-44838-P & F17-44846-P

ORDER

By order dated July 18, 2018, we ordered appellant to provide the Court with written 

verification that the reporter’s record had been requested. We cautioned appellant that the failure 

to do so might result in the appeals being submitted without a reporter’s record. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 37.3(c). To date, we have received no communication from appellant regarding the 

reporter’s record.

We ORDER these appeals submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s brief is 

DUE thirty days from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Manuel A. Cuprill, Appellant, v Citywide Towing and Auto Repair Services et al., Respondents.

[49 NYS3d 624]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Laura G. Douglas, J.), *443entered December 22, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motion to compel post-note of issue discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting defendants’ motion. Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, defendants did not seek, and the motion court did not order, vacatur of the note of issue. Trial courts are authorized, as a matter of discretion, to permit post-note of issue discovery without vacating the note of issue, so long as neither party will be prejudiced (see *Pickering v Union 15 Rest. Corp.,*107 AD3d 450 [1st Dept 2013]), and we perceive no prejudice here (see *e.g. Dominguez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*168 AD2d 376, 376-377 [1st Dept 1990]).

Counsel’s affirmations submitted with the initial motion and on reply, when viewed together, provided sufficient detail to comply with 22 NYCRR 202.7 (c) *(Loeb v Assara N.Y. I L.P.,*118 AD3d 457, 457-458 [1st Dept 2014]).

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Renwick, J.R, Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and Webber, JJ.