alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GBC Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Larry
D. Key, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, John Hopkins, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                  /s/ Larry D. Key
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  Larry D. Key, President and Chief Executive
                                  Officer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

                                  /s/ John T. Hopkins III
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  John T. Hopkins III, Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

March 22, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          98,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,312,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    133,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,691,000
<PP&E>                                      11,211,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,358,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,850,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,916,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,350,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,850,000
<SALES>                                      4,490,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,490,000
<CGS>                                        3,366,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  969,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7692

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARL M. MCMANUS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-95-27, CA-99-250-1-T) Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl M. McManus, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carl M. McManus seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his petition for writ of coram nobis as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and denying it. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. McManus , No. CR-95-27; CA-99-250-1-T (W.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 1999). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *results of operations of the
Trust.


Date: May 10, 2007                      /s/ Joel Faden
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.
                                        Chief Financial Individual
                                        Providing accounting services

*    The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
     transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in
     financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The
     Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of
     expenses. Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of
     financial condition or cash flows.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29473-29474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

May 22, 1998.
    The Department of the Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before June 29, 1998 
to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0055.
    Form Number: IRS Form 1001.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Ownership, Exemption, or Reduced Rate Certificate.
    Description: This form is used by owners of certain types of income 
to report to a withholding agent, both the ownership and any reduced or 
exempt tax rate under tax conventions or

[[Page 29474]]

treaties, and if appropriate, to claim a release of tax withheld at 
source. The withholding agent uses the information to determine the 
appropriate withholding.
    Respondents: Individuals or households. Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 100,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping--4 hr., 32 min.
Learning about the law or the form--1 hr., 5 min.
Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--1 hr., 13 min.

    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 684,000 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-0144.
    Form Number: IRS Form 2438.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Undistributed Capital Gains Tax Return.
    Description: Form 2438 is used by regulated investment companies to 
figure capital gains tax on undistributed capital gains designated 
under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 852(b)3(D). IRS uses this 
information to determine the correct tax.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 100.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping--7 hr., 39 min.
Learning about the law or the form--35 min.
Preparing and sending the form to the IRS--45 min.

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 899 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14256 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1799

For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO RETIRED PAY.

4 (a) ENTITLEMENT.—Notwithstanding any other pro5 vision of law, Joe W. Floyd of Holcomb, Mississippi, shall

6 be entitled to retired pay under section 1331 of title 10,

7 United States Code, as if such individual had completed

8 20 years of creditable service in the Army and the Army

9 Reserve. Such individual shall submit an application for

10 retired pay in accordance with subsection (b) of such sec11 tion.
2

•S 1799 IS

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Retired pay shall be paid to the

2 individual referred to in subsection (a) only for months

3 beginning after the date of the application referred to in

4 such subsection.

Æ
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8708

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.8714

Email Address

mmckinnonf@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com

April 20, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Additional Information for Second Amendment to Exemption No. 11241 

Issued to Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC Pursuant to Section 333 of the 

FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA-2014-0692)

Dear Gentlemen:

Please accept this letter as confirmation that Petitioner submitted the Phoenix Air 

UNMANNED, LLC Movie Production and Television Operations Manual ("MPTOM") as a 

proprietary and confidential document to 333exemptions@faa.gov on April 16, 2015. 

If you have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested 

amendment to allow UAS operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television 

filming, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. 

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon 

 

Counsel for Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC
Amendment to Service Provision Agreement



 Exhibit 10.24 
 SOMANTA INCORPORATED 
 AMENDMENT TO SERVICE PROVISION AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT relates to the Service Provision Agreement (the “Agreement”) between Somanta Incorporated, (“Somanta”) and Gary Bower
(“Provider”), signed and dated on 4th November 2005 by Agamemnon Epenetos and Gary Bower. 

The Amendment effects the following changes to the Agreement, to which Somanta consents, as from the date of signature 
 Page 1 
 The Provider is “GTE Consultancy Ltd”, located at 2 Monsell Court, 33-41 Monsell Road, London, N4 2UH, UK. 
 Page 7: 
 The address for notices is 
 PROVIDER: GTE Consultancy Ltd, 2 Monsell Court, 33-41 Monsell Road, London, N4 2UH, UK. 
 Page 11: 
 The payment method details are: 
  

					
		 	Account Name:	  	GTE Consultancy Limited
			
		 	 Bank Address:
	  	 HSBC Bank
 312 Seven Sisters Road, Finsbury
Park, London, N4 2AW, UK

			
		 	 IBAN:
	  	GB57MIDL40030311435647
			
		 	 BIC:
	  	MIDLGB2140P








 Page 12: 
 Exhibit A1 (i) Definitions, bullet #2 becomes 
  

	 	•	 	Service Provider is GTE Consultancy Ltd (including its officers, employees and sub-contractors), whose key employee is G R Bower 

  

													
		 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED BY:	  		  		 		 	
						
		 	Somanta Inc	  		  		 		 	
					
		 	“SOMANTA”	  		  		 	“PROVIDER”
					
		 	 /s/ Agamemnon Epenetos
	  		  		 	/s/ Gary Bower
		 	By: Agamemnon Epenetos,	  		  		 	By: Gary Bower
		 	CEO	  		  		 		 	
							
		 	 Date:
	 	19/4/06	  		  		 	Date:	 	19th April 06
						
		 	 “PROVIDER”
	  		  		 		 	
						
		 	 /s/ Gary Bower
	  		  		 		 	
		 	By: Gary Bower	  		  		 		 	
						
		 	 GTE Consultancy Ltd
	  		  		 		 	
							
		 	 Date:
	 	 19th April 06
# L_2010327EN.01002801.xml

| 11.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/28

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1171/2010

of 10 December 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Melón de La Mancha (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Melón de La Mancha’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Melón de La Mancha’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 121, 8.5.2010, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Melón de La Mancha (PGI)

---
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Nicaragua (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Nicaragua (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0  
|2021                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 1   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0  
|2022                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0  
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0  
|2024                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In the Matter of Ramapo Homeowners Association, Appellant, v Planning & Zoning Board of the Town of Ramapo et al., Respondents.

[767 NYS2d 907]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo dated August 1, 2002, which, inter alia, granted final subdivision plot approval for a subdivision entitled Butterman Place, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), dated October 23, 2002, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Since the resolution of the Planning and Zoning Board of the Town of Ramapo (hereinafter the Board) was filed on August 1, 2002, the CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the resolution, filed on September 9, 2002, was properly found to be untimely *(see Matter of Kennedy v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Crotonon-Hudson,*78 NY2d 1083). The resolution filed on August 1, 2002, contained all of the substantive portions of the Board’s determination. The error contained in the resolution was inconsequential and had no effect on the petitioner’s delay in filing *(see Matter of Kennedy v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Croton-on-Hudson, supra; Matter of Kroll v Village of E.*
      *531
      *Hampton,*293 AD2d 614 [2002]; *Matter of Platzman v Munno,*282 AD2d 539 [2001]; *Matter of Casolaro v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Elmsford,*200 AD2d 742 [1994]). Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
No. 12-7673.

#### Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-824.

#### United States ex rel. Pritsker *v.*Sodexho, Inc., et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1








SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350





I, Dennis W. Doll, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said periodic report.








/s/ Dennis W. DollDennis W. DollChief Executive Officer








Date:  May 6, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 184

SENATE

AMENDMENTS TO

HOUSE AMENDMENT
In the Senate of the United States,

August 6 (legislative day, June 30), 1992.

Resolved, That the Senate agree to the amendment of

the House of Representatives to the bill (S. 184) entitled ‘‘An

Act to provide for the exchange of certain lands within the

State of Utah, and for other purposes’’ with the following

SENATE AMENDMENTS TO

HOUSE AMENDMENT:

1 Ω1æPage 6, line 16 of the House engrossed amendment,

2 strike out ø$25,000,000¿ and insert: $50,000,000

3 Ω2æPage 10, after line 24 of the House engrossed

4 amendment, insert:

5 (3) Transfer of any mineral interests to the State of

6 Utah shall be subject to such conditions as the Secretary

7 shall prescribe to ensure due diligence on the part of the

8 State of Utah to achieve the timely development of such re9 sources.

Attest:

Secretary.
No. 12-8257.

#### Amawi *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Attachment 014



# CBI
No. 12-7387.

#### McCoy *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.