alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to France (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb    | Mar    | Apr    | May   | Jun   | Jul   | Aug   | Sep    | Oct    | Nov    | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ------ | ------ | ------ | -----
|2022                                                                                                                              |       |        | 7,332  | 2,683  | 5,677 | 3,212 | 5,680 | 1,774 | 10,545 | 2,517  | 10,572 | 3,293
|2023                                                                                                                              | 6,883 | 10,062 |        | 10,387 | 3,484 |       | 3,652 |       |        | 10,362 | 10,751 | 432  
|2024                                                                                                                              |       | 13,706 | 10,707 | 3,672  |       |       |       |       |        |        |        |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 13(a).2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



|1. | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía Anónima Nacional Teléfonos de Venezuela (CANTV) (the Company);
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 29, 2004



/s/ Armando R. YañesArmando R. YañesChief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Paulino Rosario, Appellant.

[53 NYS3d 525]

Purported appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), entered on or about May 26, 2016, which, after a hearing, denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate his judgment of conviction, unanimously dismissed, on the ground of failure to obtain leave to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.15.

Because defendant did not seek or obtain permission from a justice of this Court to appeal from the order that denied his CPL 440.10 motion, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the appeal (see CPL 450.15 [1]; 460.15; *People v Ramos,*105 AD3d 684 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1045 [2013]; *People v Argentieri,*66 AD3d 558, 559 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 769 [2010]). Although defendant obtained leave to appeal from a prior order that summarily denied his original CPL 440.10 motion, resulting in this Court’s reversal of that order and remand for a hearing (132 AD3d 454 [1st Dept 2015]), this did not obviate the necessity of permission to appeal from the separate order entered after the hearing was held.

“[A] defendant’s right to appeal within the criminal proce*451dure universe is purely statutory . . . and adherence to those requirements is a jurisdictional prerequisite for the taking of an appeal” *(People v Smith,*27 NY3d 643, 647 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see also People v Pagan,*19 NY3d 368, 370 [2012]). To deem defendant’s present notice of appeal to be a motion for leave to appeal, and to grant such leave, would be contrary to the language and purpose of the statute, as well as that of this Court’s rules (Rules of App Div, 1st Dept [22 NYCRR] § 600.8 [d]).

Concur—Renwick, J.R, Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence

ACTION: Notice of Advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence 
will meet in closed session on January 26, 1998 at Lawrence Livermore 
National Laboratory, Livermore, California; and on February 17, 1998 at 
the Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Force will address the U.S. ability to deter and prevent the 
effective use of weapons of mass destruction against U.S. territory, 
forces, and allies.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: December 24, 1997.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-13 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
# L_2010233EN.01000701.xml

| 3.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 233/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 233/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 775/2010

of 2 September 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Los Pedroches (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Los Pedroches’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Los Pedroches’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 September 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 3, 7.1.2010, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

SPAIN

Los Pedroches (PDO)

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30305 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Michael Carter,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05

- CR

- 229

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Jones,** and **Costa ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Michael Carter, federal pris oner # 29578

- 034 , has appealed the district court’s order denying his motion for resentencing pursuant to Section 404 of the First Step Act of 2018. He asserts that the district court failed to properly consider all the statutory sentencing factors , conduct an

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 3, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30305 Document: 00515731493 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/03/2021No. 20

- 30305

2 individualized assessment of his unique circumstances , and provide a sufficient explanation of its reasons for denying his motion

. He has not sho wn that the district court abused its discretion. See U nited States v. Batiste , 980 F.3d 466, 477

- 79 (5th Cir. 2020). Carter also asserts that the district court’s decision was substantively unreasonable. As he now concedes, this issue is foreclosed. S ee id. at 479

- 80. The district court’s order is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-30305 Document: 00515731493 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/03/2021
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Wyoming Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       | 445,665 | 563,274 | 590,205
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 569,667 | 508,739 | 429,731 | 328,780 | 264,146 | 202,428 | 162,961 | 142,173 | 116,030 | 95,381 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 84,013  | 74,247  | 69,631  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-429.

#### Lebowitz *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13687]



POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

NAME OF AGENCY: Postal Rate Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 3:00 p.m., May 14, 1998.

PLACE: Commission Conference Room, 1333 H Street, NW, Suite 300, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Emergency meeting to discuss issue in Docket 
No. R97-1.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001, (202) 789-6830.

    Dated: May 18, 1998.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13687 Filed 5-18-98; 4:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
No. 12-872.

#### Madigan et al. *v.*Levin.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.
#### COM. v. WARRIS, R.

2479 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

CP-39-CR-0003069-2015

(Lehigh)

Affirmed
#### Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for FFMLT 2006-FF13, Appellant, v Samuel Lopez, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[49 NYS3d 123]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered April 15, 2014, as amended by order entered May 9, 2014, which granted defendant Samuel Lopez’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and denied as academic plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, upon default, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, defendant’s motion denied, and plaintiff’s motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for his default in answering the complaint and his failure to respond to plaintiff’s motion for a reference and a default judgment *(see Citibank, N.A. v K.L.P. Sportswear, Inc.,*144 AD3d 475, 476-477 [1st Dept 2016]). His assertion that he was not sure if the *476summons and complaint were real is unavailing *(see Dorrer v Berry,*37 AD3d 519 [2d Dept 2007]), especially because he cites no efforts he made to determine the legitimacy of these papers, although the name, address and phone number of plaintiff’s counsel is prominently displayed on them. Moreover, defendant offered no explanation for failing, after attending a settlement conference, to seek to serve either an answer to the complaint or opposition to the motion for a reference and default judgment, which he does not deny receiving. Having so defaulted, and having failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for his defaults, defendant is precluded from moving to dismiss the foreclosure action on the ground of plaintiffs alleged failure to comply with RPAPL 1304 *(see PHH Mtge. Corp. v Celestin,*130 AD3d 703, 704 [2d Dept 2015]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Turkiye (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.53   | 4.84   | 5.38   | 5.13  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.48   | 8.98   | 11.09  | 7.71   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         377,587
<SECURITIES>                                   100,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  474,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,449,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,510,123
<PP&E>                                         609,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                 502,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,428,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          275,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        52,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,101,704
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,428,806
<SALES>                                      2,821,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,821,220
<CGS>                                        1,761,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,079,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of
the Quarterly Report of The Midland Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2004 (the Report), I, John W. Hayden, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ John W. HaydenJohn W. HaydenPresident and Chief Executive Officer August 5, 2004 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906
has been provided to The Midland
Company and will be retained by The
Midland Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. 36