alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Sweetgrass, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Sweetgrass, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
08/29/2014

Notice : This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter . Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions , Alabama Appellat e Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0649), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections m a y be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter . 

# SUPREME COURT O F ALA BAMA SPECI AL TE RM 20 14

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ 11305 71

_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ Ex pa rte L arry J. Cl ement s PETIT ION FOR WR IT OFCERT IORAR I TO THE COURT OFCIVI L APP EALS (In r e: A labama Sta te Pe rsonn el Bo ard
v. LarryJ. C lemen ts) (Mont gomer y Cir cuit Court , CV- 12-90 1165; Courtof C ivil Appea ls, 2 12072 6) SHAW, Just ice. The p etiti on fo r the writ of c ertio rari is de nied. In denyi ng the petit ion for the writ of certi orari , this Court does not w i s h to be under stood as appro ving all the11305 71

langu age, reaso ns, or state ments of law in the Court of Civil Appea ls’ o pinio n. H orsle y v. Horsl ey, 2 91 Al a. 78 2, 28 0 So. 2d 15 5 (19 73). WRIT DENIE D. S t u a r t , Bolin , Parke r, Murdo ck, Main, Wise, and Bryan , JJ., concu r. Moore , C.J ., di ssent s.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,170
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,790
<PP&E>                                           9,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,307
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,867
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,308
<SALES>                                         13,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,348
<CGS>                                            2,386
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             33,350
<SECURITIES>                                      189,234
<RECEIVABLES>                                     739,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                       12,506
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,159,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                           244,265
<COMMON>                                              293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        20,859
<OTHER-SE>                                         34,250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,159,336
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   37,980
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      28,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    1,766
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 2,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        2,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       9,616.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       9,616.00
        

</TABLE>
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mentor Corporation (the "Company") onForm 10‐Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Loren L. McFarland, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/LOREN L. MCFARLANDLoren L. McFarlandChief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 5, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JAKE DOUGLAS BYLSMA

PETITION OF: AARON DIEGO MARTIN, 

ESQUIRE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 119 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November , 2023, in consideration of the Application 

to Withdraw as Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Adams County for that court to determine whether to permit Attorney Aaron Diego Martin 

to withdraw. If present counsel is granted leave to withdraw, the court is to resolve 

whether to allow Jake Douglas Bylsma to proceed pro se. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Adams County is DIRECTED to enter its order on 

remand within 90 days and to promptly notify this Court of its determination.
No. 12A606.

#### Noonan et al. *v.*Bowen, Secretary of State of California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Application for stay, addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court, denied.
No. 12-776.

#### Lyons *v.*Crestview Condominium Trust.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-588.

#### Guerrero-Castro *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7474.

#### Alvarez *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-19]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Gallup, NM

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Gallup Municipal Airport, Gallup, NM.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 12989 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 
817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 17, 1998 
(63 FR 12989). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 5, 1998.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12712 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Horne, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 880]

*1400Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Wolfgang, J.), entered July 16, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of burglary in the first degree and menacing in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [4]) and menacing in the second degree (§ 120.14 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The victim testified that he was awakened by someone pounding at the door to his apartment and that, when he opened the door, defendant pointed a shotgun at his face and demanded to know the whereabouts of the victim’s roommate. That testimony was corroborated by the roommate and the roommate’s girlfriend, each of whom heard the exchange and recognized defendant’s voice. In addition, the roommate heard the victim refer to the gun, and his girlfriend heard the victim say “get that thing away from me.” Although there were inconsistences in the testimony of those three witnesses, “resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses” *(People v Hernandez,*288 AD2d 489, 490 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 729 [2002]; *see People v Williams,*291 AD2d 897, 898 [2002], *lv denied*97 NY2d 763 [2002]).

We further conclude that the People met their initial burden of establishing that the showup identification procedure was reasonable under the circumstances and was not unduly suggestive, and defendant failed to meet his ultimate burden of proving otherwise *(see People v Ortiz,*90 NY2d 533, 537 [1997]). The showup was conducted in “geographic and temporal proximity to the crime” *(id.).*Furthermore, the police had defendant turn *1401in the direction of the patrol car transporting the victim as it passed by, in order to prevent the victim from viewing the handcuffs on defendant, which were behind his back. The fact that defendant was standing in the presence of police officers does not by itself render the showup unduly suggestive *(see People v Ross,*305 AD2d 1073, 1074 [2003]).

We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation” *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 26, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13865 Filed 5-20-98; 12:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
No. 12-7539.

#### Adame-Wilson *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                    
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Transported (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6722.

#### Black *v.*Terrell, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, M. G. Duncan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 13, 2004/s/ M. G. DUNCANM. G. DuncanChief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5970 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5970

**Commission Decision of 10/12/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5970 - CA IMMO / EUROPOLIS) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 10.12.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/19826

C(2010) 9240 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5970 – CA IMMO / EUROPOLIS

Notification of 15.11.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 318, 23.11.2010, p.9

1. On 15 November 2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings CA Immobilien Anlagen AG ("CA Immo", Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Europolis AG ("Europolis", Austria) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for CA Immo: real estate investment, real estate development, asset management and property management in a number of European countries;

- for Europolis: real estate investment, real estate development and asset management in a number of European countries.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission,

(signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.