alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12-310.

No. 12-426.

No. 12-677.

No. 12-5614.

No. 12-6131.

No. 12-6181.

No. 12-6214.

No. 12-6215.

No. 12-6264.

No. 12-6297.

No. 12-6365.

No. 12-6372.

No. 12-6376.

#### Lallier *v.*Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts et al., Payne *v.*Whole Foods Market Group, Inc., Bosworth *v.*United States, Shrader *v.*United States, Burke *v.*McCollum, Warden, *Sonachansingh*v. Lee, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Ashford *v.*Wenerowicz, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Graterford, et al., Anderson *v.*City of Riverside, California, et al., Johnson *v.*Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P. C., et al., Allen *v.*Clements, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, et al., Holland *v.*Monroe County Children and Youth Services et al., Thompson *v.*Gonzalez, Warden, Russ *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, *1189Gates *v.*Westereng, In re Brown, Hugueley *v.*Tennessee, Dobric *v.*Park Lane North Owner, Inc., et al., Woodard *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., Moore *v.*Hollingsworth, Warden, In re Joyner, Randleman *v.*United States, Johnson *v.*Florida Department of Corrections, Alejandro *v.*United States, Vaksman *v.*United States, Meador *v.*Branson, In re Bourgeois, In re Hien Anh Dao,

*1188
      *ante,*p. 1027;

*ante,*p. 1029;

*ante,*p. 1091;

*ante,*p. 1049;

*ante,*p. 1013;

*ante,*p. 1000;

*ante,*p. 1014;

*ante,*p. 1014;

*ante,*p. 1001;

*ante,*p. 1031;

*ante,*p. 1032;

*ante,*p. 1033;

*ante,*p. 1033;

*1189No. 12-6452.

No. 12-6506.

No. 12-6517.

No. 12-6593.

No. 12-6761.

No. 12-6887.

No. 12-6903.

No. 12-6921.

No. 12-6942.

No. 12-6975.

No. 12-7028.

No. 12-7143.

No. 12-7217.

No. 12-7294.

*ante,*p. 1049;

*ante,*p. 1047;

*ante,*p. 1051;

*ante,*p. 1052;

*ante,*p. 1053;

*ante,*p. 1038;

*ante,*p. 1025;

*ante,*p. 1038;

*ante,*p. 1054;

*ante,*p. 1055;

*ante,*p. 1056;

*ante,*p. 1105;

*ante,*p. 1068; and

*ante,*p. 1122. Petitions for rehearing denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00208

- CV

JOSE ADOLFO SALINAS AND ANGELA SALINAS v. GREGORIA JACKSON
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 19

- 6022

- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APP EALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed

. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Each pa rty will bear its own costs

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 1, 2021
#### IN RE: ADOPTION OF I.E.B. Appeal of: R.B.S., mother

511 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

99 of 2015 (Westmoreland)

Affirmed
2017-1156.

#### State v. Stewart.

Delaware App. No. 17 CAA 01 0004, 2017-Ohio-2842. On appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ decision. Motion denied.

DeWine, J., dissents.
##### 



Exhibit 32-4

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
(the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
    of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
    2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|
| | (2) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          



| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| | /S/ DAVID E. MEADOR                    
| | _______________________________________
| | David E. Meador                        
| | Senior Vice President and              
| | Chief Financial Officer of             
| | Michigan Consolidated Gas Company      

Dated: November 7, 2003
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Oklahoma Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.56   | 4.45  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.21   | 5.97   | 2.83   | 14.85  | 4.47   | 8.56   | 3.12   | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.16   | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2017-0121.

#### State ex rel. Hobbs v. Gilb.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                             
|No chart available.                                                                             
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | W      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Dennis Fagan, Appellant, v Joanne Fagan, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 849]-

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff ap*395peals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.), entered May 7, 2002, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded the defendant one half of that the portion of his pension which was earned during the marriage and a two thirds share in the marital home, directed that ownership of the marital home be transferred to the defendant in exchange for an offset from her distributive share of his pension equal to his distributive share in the residence, and awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee in the sum of $16,169.83.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the defendant an attorney’s fee in the sum of $16,169.83; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the defendant.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the defendant one half of that portion of his pension which was earned during the marriage. A pension earned during a marriage and prior to the execution of a separation agreement, or the commencement of a matrimonial action is marital property subject to equitable distribution *(see Olivo v Olivo,*82 NY2d 202 [1993]; Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [c]). Here, although the parties were separated for almost 15 years, the record does not support the plaintiffs contention that their economic partnership ended after he left the marital home *(see generally Barbuto v Barbuto,*286 AD2d 741 [2001]). Furthermore, the plaintiff remained involved with the defendant and the parties’ children. He voluntarily provided them with some monetary support and contributed to the upkeep of the marital home.

The Supreme Court also providently exercised its discretion in awarding the wife a two thirds share of the marital home. Based on the circumstances of this case, the court’s distribution was equitable *(see Seifried v Seifried,*296 AD2d 398 [2002]).

The Supreme Court, however, improvidently awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee in the sum of $16,169.83, as the equities of this case dictate that each party pay his or her own attorney’s fee *(see Matter of Mullen v Just,*288 AD2d 476, 477 [2001] , *lv denied*97 NY2d 613 [2002], *cert denied*537 US 820 [2002] ).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 10.68  | 10.27  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1443 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1443

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                       luxury passenger vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            September 8 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Mr. Exon (for himself and Mr. Kerrey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax on 
                       luxury passenger vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LUXURY TAX ON PASSENGER VEHICLES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 31 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to retail excise taxes) is amended by striking subchapter A.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Subsection (c) of section 4221 is amended by striking 
        ``4001(c), 4001(d), or''.
            (2) Subsection (d) of section 4222 is amended by striking 
        ``4001(c), 4001(d),''.
            (3) The table of subchapters for chapter 31 is amended by 
        striking the item relating to subchapter A.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on January 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3042419-APR-201108:47 AM
`[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1716 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1716
                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
  the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three


                                 An Act

  
 
  To amend the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act to extend 
the

                         deadlines for reports.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTS FROM THE COMMISSION.

    Section 9 of the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act (36 
U.S.C. 149 note) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``December 31, 1992'' and 
    inserting ``March 15, 1994''; and
        (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``December 31, 1993'' and 
    inserting ``December 31, 1994''.

SEC. 2. AUDIT OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS.

    Section 10(b) of the Thomas Jefferson Commemoration Commission Act 
(36 U.S.C. 149 note) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``December 31, 1992'' each place it appears and 
    inserting ``March 15, 1994'';
        (2) by striking ``March 4, 1994'' and inserting ``March 3, 
    1995''; and
        (3) by striking ``1993'' and inserting ``1994''.







                                Speaker of the House of Representatives.







                             Vice President of the United States and    
                                                President of the Senate.`
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1879

To provide disaster assistance to producers for certain losses due to freezing

conditions in 1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 28 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1994

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself and Mr. LOTT) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

A BILL

To provide disaster assistance to producers for certain losses

due to freezing conditions in 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR CERTAIN LOSSES

4 DUE TO FREEZING CONDITIONS IN 1994.

5 The matter under the heading ‘‘COMMODITY CREDIT

6 CORPORATION FUND’’ under the heading ‘‘COMMODITY

7 CREDIT CORPORATION’’ of chapter I of Public Law 103–

8 75 (107 Stat. 741) (as amended by the matter under the

9 heading ‘‘COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION’’ of chapter

10 I of Public Law 103–211) is further amended—
2

•S 1879 IS

1 (1) by inserting after ‘‘title XXII of Public Law

2 101–624’’ the following: ‘‘or as otherwise determined

3 by the Secretary’’; and

4 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the

5 following: ‘‘: Provided further, That funds made

6 available under this paragraph for the Commodity

7 Credit Corporation shall also be available for pay8 ments to producers for the 1994 through 1998 or9 chard crop losses, and 1994 forest crop, livestock,

10 and dairy losses, if the losses are due to freezing

11 conditions in 1994, except that the use of funds

12 made available under this proviso is designated by

13 Congress as an emergency requirement pursuant to

14 section 251(b)(2)(D)(i) of the Balanced Budget and

15 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C.

16 901(b)(2)(D)(i)) and the use shall be available only

17 to the extent the President designates the use as an

18 emergency requirement pursuant to such Act’’.

Æ
No. 12-7382.

#### Wilson et al. *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
No. 12M80.

No. 12M81.

No. 12M82.

No. 12M83.

No. 12M84.

No. 12M85.

No. 12M86.

No. 12M87.

No. 12M89.

No. 12M90.

No. 12M91.

#### Santamaria *v.*Knowlin, Warden; Hardin *v.*Monroe County, Florida, et al.; Chevalier *v.*New York et al.; Glenn *v.*Kane et al.; Laroche *v.*Fisher et al.; Frengler *v.*General Motors et al.; Lepeska v. Florida Department of Corrections et al.; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union Number 164, AFL-CIO *v.*U. S. Information Systems, Inc.; Mayard *v.*Siegfried; Franklin, Administratrix of the Estate of Franklin *v.*Garden State Life Insurance et al.; and Bieri *v.*Cordonnier, Judge, Circuit Court of Missouri, Greene County.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
No. 12-7681.

#### Ruiz *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-970.

#### McKesson Technologies, Inc. *v.*Epic Systems Corp.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.
No. 12-810.

#### Brennan *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8437.

#### Lawrence *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.