alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6559

MELVIN FRAZIER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; MICHAEL JACKSON, JR., TV Personality, Oldest son of pop singer Michael Jackson , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis , III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv
- 00201

- TSE

- IDD )

Submitted : November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Melvin Frazier, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Melvin Fra zier appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.
3 4(b). Because Frazier ’s informal brief fails to challenge the bas is for the district court’s disposition, Frazier has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an i mportant document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Frazier’s motion to amend the complaint and dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
13.1
 
 Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Highway Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roland Kohl, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  
 Dated:
June 29, 2010
  /s/ Roland W.
Kohl
 Roland W.
Kohl
 Chief
Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), T.C. Leung, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Sections 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| July 14, 2005 |                    |
|--------------------|-------------------------|
|               |                    |
|               |                    |
|               | /s/ T.C. Leung          |   |
|               | T.C. Leung              |
|               | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31(a)****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**     I, Kevin L. Barnett, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Core Molding Technologies, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of the annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 28, 2007         /s/ Kevin L. Barnett   Kevin L. Barnett   President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
2016-1663.

#### Rownd v. Marcelli.

Stark App. No. 2015 CA 00154, 2016-Ohio-7142.

Kennedy and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES – OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of NovaStar Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Lance Anderson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes – Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 22, 2011

/s/ W. Lance AndersonW. Lance AndersonChairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.




---
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549



FORM 10-QSB



[ X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004

Or

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______  to _______



Commission file number 001-08187



MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



IDAHO                                       82-0144710

(State or other jurisdiction of                 (IRS Employer

incorporation or organization)                   Identification Number)



410 Sherman Avenue   Suite 207

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho

(Address of principal executive offices)



83814-2862

(Zip Code)



(208) 664-3544

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)



Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports

required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period

that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has

been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  [X]    No



APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's

classes of common stock as of December 31, 2004:  3,192,531 shares of

5 cent par value per share.



Transitional small business disclosure format (check one):

Yes( )     No(x)



















<page>

MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY

Form 10-QSB

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004





PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION



The Registrant falls within the provisions of Rule 13a-13(c)(2) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as an exploration stage

mining company not in the production stage and claims exemption there

under from the requirement to file Part I.





PART II    OTHER INFORMATION





ITEM 1  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

NONE.



ITEM 2  CHANGES IN SECURITIES

NONE.



ITEM 3  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

NONE.



ITEM 4  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

NONE.



ITEM 5  OTHER INFORMATION

NONE.



ITEM 6  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K



Exhibit 31  Rule 13a-14a and 15d-14a Certification

Exhibit 32  Section 1350 Certification







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities and

Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be

signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company

(Registrant)



Dated: February 13, 2005



By  /S/ Delaine H. Gruber

Delaine Hess Gruber, President
No. 12-5948.

#### Carthen *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May   | Jun   | Jul   | Aug   | Sep | Oct  | Nov  | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |      |       |       |       |       |     |      | W    | W  
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 9.71 | 12.24 | 13.53 | 10.41 | 13.28 |     | W    | 9.08 |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W    |       |       |       |       |     | 5.69 |      |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-105-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2986
In Re: LEEVY'S FUNERAL HOME, Debtor.

_________________________ GLORIA Y. LEEVY; GREGORY K. LEEVY, Appellants, versus G. WILLIAM MCCARTHY, Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-2288-3-17, BK-94-75327) Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gloria Y. Leevy, Gregory K. Leevy, Appellants Pro Se. William Earl Calloway, Sr., Eleanor Katherine Wells, ROBINSON, MENDOZA, BARTON, MCCARTHY & CALLOWAY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing as moot their appeal from the bankruptcy court's orders authorizing the sale of Leevy's Funeral Home, Inc. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Leevy v. McCarthy , Nos. CA-95-2288-3-17; BK-94-75327 (D.S.C. Oct. 12, 1995). Further, we grant Appellee's motion to strike exhibits which are not part of the record on appeal and deny Appellee's motion to strike the supplement to Appellants' informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Kingston v New York City Tr. Auth.

App Div, 1st Dept: 2016 NY Slip Op 78897(U)

denied*
RorvA.McMaho n J ^ N n • FJtPARTWhN T O F

Commissione r

o f Aviatio n _5 7 C^/^77^7V'; p \ j ": ••-•A^''^PORTATlO N 

### :nCK£fOPtR/ATlQN S 201 0 GC i - U A R^2 3 DEPARTMEN T O FAVIATIO N Stephani e A
. Miner , Mayo r

Augus t 27,201 0
Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretar y o f

Transportatio n Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Re : Proposa l Unde r

th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra m Syracus e Hancoc k

Internationa l Airpor t Dear Secretar y LaHood ; Th e Cit y o f

Syracus e (City) , i

n conjunctio n withth e CenterStat e Corporatio n for Economi c Opportunit y (CEO) , respectfull y submit s aproposa l unde r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra mfo r

Syracus e Hancoc k

Internationa l Airport
. A s apubli c sponso r fo r thi s public/privat e partnership , th e City o f Syracus e hereb y applie s fo r agran t o f federa l funds , i

n th e amoun t o f $ 1,000,000 , unde r

th e DO T Progra mfor

FY2010
. Th e requeste dDO T grant , combine dwith$300,00 0 tha t th e CE O wil l contribute , in additio n t o $750,00 0 fro mth e Departmen t o f Aviatio n i

n th e for mo f fe e waivers , an d$250,00 0 fro mth e busines s communit y in th e for mo f in-kirid-services , wil l allo w th e Cit y an dCE O t o provid e a ris k abatemen t

fijndfo r alow-cost-carrie r

t o initiat e servic e at

Syracus e Hancoc k

Internationa l Airport
. A s acommunit y withvery limite don e low-cos t service , w e ar e a

t adisadvantag e whe n compare dwithth e othe r Ne w York

Stat e airport s locate din th e Thruwa y Corridor ; whe n i t come s t o bein g abl e t o offer low-cost , convenien t

je t servic e t o th e market s ou r communit y needs , w e canno t

compete , an dconsistentl y los e loca l traflFi c t o thos e airports
.

HANCOC K

INTERNATIONA LAIRPOR T • SYRACUSK , N.V
. 1321 2 • (315 ) 454-326 3 • TAX : (315 ) 454-875 7 • www.syrairport.nr gHonorabl e Ra y LaHoo d

Augus t 27 , 201 0 Pag e 2

Th e enclose dapplicatio n demonstrate s th e nee dfo r a n additiona l low-cos t

carrier , an dhow , wit

h th e assistanc e o f

SCAS D fijnds, th e Syracus e regio n wil l hav e th e resource s it need s t o attrac t an dprovid e ris k

abatemen t

resource s t o ensur e asuccessfii l lon g termrelationshi p in th e Syracus e market
. Pleas e d o no t

hesitat e t o contac t

m e directly , at

(315 ) 454-326 3 shoul dyo u hav e an y questions , o r requir e additiona l information
. Ver y trul y yours ,

ar y A
. McMaho n !;ommissione r

o f Aviatio n
**Exhibit 31.B**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Greg G. Gruber, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ANR PipelineCompany;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this Report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis Report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this Reportis being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisReport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 11, 2005               /s/ Greg G. Gruber   Greg G. Gruber   Senior Vice President,
Exhibit 10.1


 


HRPT PROPERTIES TRUST


 


Summary of Trustee Compensation


 


The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the trustees of HRPT Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees.



	
            •
 	
            Each independent trustee receives an annual fee of $25,000, plus a fee of $500 for each meeting attended.  Up to two $500 fees are payable if a board meeting and one or more board committee meetings are held on the same date.
 





	
            •
 	
            The chairpersons of the audit committee, the compensation committee and the nominating and governance committee, each of whom is an independent trustee, receive an additional annual fee of $7,500, $3,500 and $3,500, respectively.
 





	
            •
 	
            Each trustee is entitled to receive a grant of 2,250 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first board meeting attended).
 





	
            •
 	
            The Company generally reimburses all trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as trustees.