alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010056EN.01000601.xml

| 6.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 191/2010

of 5 March 2010

fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 6 March 2010

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 137 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 168 643 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2009 to 28 February 2010. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 168 643 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2009 to 28 February 2010. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted.

| (2) | The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 shall be EUR 30 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

---
Docket No 61755 

Appellant filed his petition on June 8, 2012, more than one 

year after entry of the judgment of conviction on May 4, 2011. 2Thus, 

appellant's petition was untimely filed and procedurally barred absent a 

demonstration of good cause—cause for the delay and undue prejudice. 

See NRS 34.726(1). 

To overcome the procedural bar, appellant claimed that he 

does not fully understand English, does not fully understand the law, and 

relied on a fellow inmate to prepare this petition. The underlying claims 

in this petition are similar to claims raised in a motion for modification of 

sentence filed in the district court on October 5, 2011, and therefore, 

appellant failed to demonstrate that an impediment external to the 

defense prevented him from raising the claims in a timely petition. 

Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). In 

addition, that appellant relied on a fellow inmate for legal work and that 

English is not his first language did not demonstrate good cause. See 

generally Phelps v. Dir., Nev. Dep't of Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 660, 764 P.2d 

1303, 1306 (1988) (holding that petitioner's claim of organic brain damage, 

borderline mental retardation and reliance on assistance of inmate law 

clerk unschooled in the law did not constitute good cause for the filing of a 

successive post-conviction petition). Therefore, the district court did not 

err in denying the petition as procedurally barred. 

2No direct appeal was taken. 
Douglas 

8aiita 

Docket No. 62000 

Appellant filed a second notice of appeal from the same order 

that was the subject of Docket No. 61755. The clerk of this court 

inadvertently docketed an appeal in Docket No. 62000 as a separate 

matter when appellant filed the second, duplicative notice of appeal. 

Accordingly, we direct the clerk of this court to administratively close the 

appeal in Docket No. 62000. 

For the foregoing reasons, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED in 

Docket No. 61755 and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE THE APPEAL in 

Docket No. 62000. 

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Fransisco Alfredo Ramos 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

J. 

J. 

3
Contact Information: Sarah Folsland, Communications: (605) 721-1609 Jason Ketchum, Investor Relations: (605) 721-7265 Media Relations: (866) 243-9002



### BLACK HILLS POWER TO SUSPEND OP ERATIONS AT 62-YEAR-OLD OSAGE
POWER PLANT Reduction in regional demand for electricity
OSAGE, Wyo.

— Sept. 9, 2010 — Black Hills Corp. (NYSE:BKH) subsidiary Black Hills Power today announced suspension of operations at its 62-year-old, 34.5-megawatt coal-fired Osage Power Plant in Osage, Wyo., beginning Oct. 1, 2010.
“Considering the slow economic recovery that c ontinues to impact the demand for electricity in the Western region, Black Hills Power has elected to suspend operations at Osage. We now have other generation alternatives available to us that are more economical as we continue to provide lowcost, reliable energy for our customers,” said Chuc k Loomis, vice president of operations for Black Hills Power. “The Osage Power Plant will remain an asset in our generation portfolio, and all operating permits will be retained so we can resume full operations when needed.”
BHP employs 18 people at the Osage plant. After the generation is suspended on Oct. 1, the employees will continue working until about Oct. 15 , 2010, to prepare the equipment at the plant for the suspension. Black Hills Power is evaluating each Osage employee’s individual situation and discussing alternative employment options available within the company. In addition, outplacement services will be available if needed. No other suspen sions of operations at Black Hills Power facilities are planned.

Black Hills Power, Inc. Black Hills Power is the legacy utility business of Black Hill s Corp. (NYSE: BKH) and has been delivering energy for more than 125 years. The electric utility serves 66,900 custom ers in 25 communities in western South Dakota, northeastern Wyoming, and southeastern Montana.
Black Hills Corporation Black Hills Corp. — a diversified energy company with a tradition of exemplary service and a vision to be the energy partner of choice — is based in Rapid City, S.D., with corporate offices in Denver and Omaha, Neb. The company serves 763,300 natural gas and electric utility customers in Colora do, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming. The company’s non-regulated businesses generate whol esale electricity, produce natural gas, oil and coal, and market energy. Black Hills’ 2,200 employees partner to produce results that improve life with energy. More information is available at www.blackhillscorp.com. 

### ###
DENY; and Opinion Filed December 1 , 2015 . 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 15 - 01414 - CV IN RE TERRENCE M. GO RE , Relator Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 12 - 12707 - U



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Myers This original proceeding arises from a contempt proceeding based on relator’s fai lure to pay child support. Relator first filed this proceeding seeking a petition for writ of habeas corpus, but then amended his pleading to seek mandamus relief
. The issues presented in both realtor’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and petition for writ of mandamus are identical. Although relator states the trial court has issued a capias warrant for his arrest, i t does not appear relator is incarcerated
. O n numerous prior occasions we have addressed and rejected the complaints relator raises in bo th the petition for writ of mandamus and the petition for writ of habeas corpus
. See In re Gore , 454 S.W.3d 711 , 711 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2015) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ of mandamus asserting virtually identical complaints); In re Gore , 05

- 14

- 014 22

- CV, 2014 WL 6466845, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Nov. 19, 2014, orig. proceeding), (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ of habeas corpus because record failed to include proof relator was actually– 2

– restrained); In re Gore , No. 05

- 14

- 00103

- CV, 2014 WL 476784 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Feb. 5, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) ( denying virtually identical petition for writ of mandamus); In re Gore , No. 05

- 13

- 00364

- CV, 2013 WL 1274740, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Mar. 20, 2013, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying petition for writ of mandamus raising many of same issues)
. We do not revisit those issues here. We DENY the petition.

151414F.P05 LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Order entered December 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01202-CV

HADDINGTON FUND, LP AND JB WEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, Appellants

V.

BRADLEY S. KIDWELL, BRADLEY S. KIDWELL FAMILY LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, AND MARY COE KIDWELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-02197-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Latresta Ginyard’s December 20, 2019 request for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the 

reporter’s record due on or before January 10, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
MEMORANDUM 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

SUBJECT: Posting EPA-HQ-OAR-2006-0605-Phase: Notice to Regulations.gov for Public Access 

FROM: Pamela Long (1 ~ S .y Air Quality Polic~ivision, OAQPS 

Thru: Anna Marie Wood, Director W 

Air Quality Policy Division, OAQP 

This memorandum authorized the posting of Phase: Notice ofEPA-HQ-OAR-20 6-0605 to 

Regulations.gov for public access. 

The subject docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HAQ-OAR-2006-0605) supports a Federal Register notice to 

be published titled, "Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 

Micrometers (PM2.5) - Increments, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring 

Concentrations (SMC) - Notice of Action Denying Petition for Reconsideration and Amended 

Rulemaking." This Federal Register will announce that the EPA has responded to a petition from the 

State ofNorth Carolina in letters to the signatories of the petition will provide details of the docket 

document ID numbers of the incoming petition and the response letters signed on August 28,2014. 

There is no comment period associated with this Federal Register notice. Publication of the Federal 

Register notice will statt the 60-day clock for filing petitions for review of the response letters. 

Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eric Shultz at (202) 566-

1883, or via email at Schultz.eric(CV,epa.gov. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w~ h Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1805

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the disparity between

the periods of delay provided for civilian and military retiree cost-ofliving adjustments in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to eliminate the

disparity between the periods of delay provided for civilian and military retiree cost-of-living adjustments in the

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DISPARITY BETWEEN THE PE4 RIODS OF DELAY OF CIVILIAN AND MILITARY

5 RETIREE COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENTS.

6 Section 1401a(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States

7 Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 1805 IS

1 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR FISCAL YEARS

2 1994 THROUGH 1996.—In the case of an increase

3 in retired pay that, pursuant to paragraph (1),

4 becomes effective on December 1 of 1993,

5 1994, or 1995, the initial month for which such

6 increase is payable as part of such retired pay

7 shall (notwithstanding such December 1 effec8 tive date) be March of the following year.’’.

Æ
No. 12-8225.

#### Rosas-Herrera *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132081 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132081 COA: 270976 Muskegon CC: 04-050971-FC JOSEPH ALLAN IRISH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1120 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2006

Clerk
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Newark, NJ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Newark, NJ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Barbados (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 17.98  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7762.

#### Patterson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 16

- 17111 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:08

- cr - 00326

- HES

- JRK

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus JAMES ROBERT COTTER, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

________________________ (August 16, 2017) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , JORDAN and ROSENBAUM , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James Cotter appeals the revoc ation of his supervised release, 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 83(e)(3) , fo r possessing child pornography. Cotter argues that there i s

Case: 16-17111 Date Filed: 08/16/2017 Page: 1 of 22 insufficient evidence that he violated the conditions of his supervised release and that the district court clearly erred when it found that the recantation of his confe ssion was not credible. We affirm. We review a ruling that a defendant violated the terms of his supervised release for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Copeland , 20 F .3d 412, 413 (11th Cir. 1994). Credibility determinations are the province of the fact finder who personally observes the witnesses and is in a better position than a reviewing court to assess the ir credibility. United States v. Ramirez

- Chilel , 289 F.3d 744, 749 (11th Cir. 2002). The district court did not abuse its discretion when it revoked Co tter’s supervised release. The district court was entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence that , on October 14, 2014, while on supervised release, Cotter knowingly possessed child pornography and that he admitted that , on March 17, 2016, he accessed the internet using a cell phone and a tablet device to download child pornography. Circumstantial evidence supports the inference that Cotter had access to and used a secure digital memory card to obtain child pornography. A nd t he district court did not clearly err when it discredited Cotter’s recantation of his earlier confession. The district court was entitled to find that Cotter’s admissions about view ing images of males but not females w ere credible. W e affirm. AFFIRMED. Case: 16-17111 Date Filed: 08/16/2017 Page: 2 of 2
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar   | Apr   | May   | Jun   | Jul   | Aug   | Sep   | Oct | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | -----
|2022                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0     | 0     | 0     | 0     | 0     | 0     | 0   | 0     | 329  
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 6,462 | 0     | 6,935 | 1,622 | 3,666 | 6,630 | 7,057 | 0   | 3,335 | 2,762
|2024                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0     | 3,215 | 3,321 |       |       |       |       |     |       |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8139.

#### Black *v.*Wilkinson, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.