alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Sellusyourhouse.com, LLC v. Russell Walker and/or All

Occupants of 9325 Grady Street, Houston, Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00201

- CV

Trial court case number: 1104954

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

This Court’s September 20, 201 8 Order had sua sponte extended the deadline either for the parties to file objections to the June 6, 2018 Mediation Order or for appellant, Sellusyourhouse.com, LLC , to pay for the reporter’s record within 10 days of the date of

that Order. That Order als o warned appellant th at if no response was timely filed within 10 days of the date of that Order, this Court would deem the Mediation Order withdrawn and set the briefing schedule without a reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c) (1),
(2) . Neither a timely response nor the reporter’s record has been filed in this Court.

Accordingly, this Court deems the Mediation Order withdrawn and directs the Clerk

of this Court to withdraw the Mediation Order. This Court will consider and decide this appeal on those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c)(1), (2). Appell a nt’ s br i ef is ORDERED to be filed no later

than 3 0 da y s from the date of th i s orde r

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days from the filing of appellant’s brief.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __ October 18, 2018

____________________
No. 12-7820.

#### Metcalf *v.*Sexton, Warden.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6228

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YOLANDA PATRICE MOTON, a/k/a Yolanda Johnson, a/k/a Yo-Yo,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:13-cr-00173-RBS-LRL-1; 2:15-

cv-00458-RBS)

Submitted: August 10, 2017 Decided: August 15, 2017

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yolanda Patrice Moton, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Patrice Moton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief in 

part on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moton has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-4.56



 Exhibit 4.56 
 (English Translation) 
 Supplementary Agreement to Exclusive Technology
Consulting and Services Agreement (No.1) 
 This Supplementary Agreement to Exclusive Technology Consulting and Services
Agreement (No.1) (the “Supplementary Agreement No. 1”) is entered into by and among the following parties on September 6, 2011 in Beijing: 
  

			
	 Party A:
	  	Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
		
	 Address:
	  	3/F, Baidu Campus, No. 10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, The People’s Republic of China
		
	 Party B:
	  	Baidu HR Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
		
	 Address:
	  	No. 713-1, No. 200 Huiyuan Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, PRC

 WHEREAS: 

A. Based on the Exclusive Technology Consulting and Services Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) and the Supplementary Agreement to Exclusive
Technology Consulting and Services Agreement (the “Supplementary Agreement”), through friendly negotiation, the parties hereto agree to supplement the Original Agreement and the Supplementary Agreement as follows on September 6, 2011:

 1. Both parties agree to add Section 2.3: “Party A shall have the right to decide or adjust the service fees or the
calculation at its sole discretion, regardless any different provisions herein.” 
 2. This Supplementary Agreement
No. 1 shall form an integral part of the Original Agreement. This Supplementary Agreement No. 1 shall prevail should there be any inconsistency between the Original Agreement and this Supplementary Agreement No. 1. The Original
Agreement shall be applied to the matters not provided in this Supplementary Agreement No. 1. 
 B. This Supplementary Agreement No. 1
shall be effective upon the parties’ signing. 
 C. This Supplementary Agreement No. 1 shall be executed in two originals, each party
holding one original. All the originals shall have the same legal effect. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 1 








 Party A: Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. 

Authorized representative: Zhan Wang 
 Signature:
/s/ Zhan Wang 
 Seal: (the seal of Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.) 

Party B: Baidu HR Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 
 Authorized representative: 
 Signature: /s/ Authorized representative 

Seal: (the seal of Baidu HR Consulting (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.) 

  
 2
2016-1082.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Bellew.

On relator’s motion to remand proceeding to the Board of Professional Conduct to initiate default proceedings seeking permanent disbarment. Motion granted. The interim default suspension imposed against respondent on September 9, 2016, shall remain in place while this matter is pending before the board. Proceedings before this court in this case are stayed until further order of this court.
No. 12-933.

#### Waldman et al. *v.*Stone.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# L_2010214EN.01001301.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 214/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 214/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 736/2010

of 13 August 2010

correcting the Latvian version of Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 as regards the support schemes for farmers provided for in Titles IV and V thereof

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (1) and in particular Article 142(c) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Several errors appear in the Latvian language version of the text of Articles 31, 32 and 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Several errors appear in the Latvian language version of the text of Articles 31, 32 and 33 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 (2).

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1121/2009 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Direct Payments, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Direct Payments,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Concerns only the Latvian language version.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 August 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 30, 31.1.2009, p. 16.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 316, 2.12.2009, p. 27.

2

---
# L_2010286EN.01000501.xml

| 4.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 286/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 286/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 985/2010

of 3 November 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Bruna bönor från Öland (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Bruna bönor från Öland’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Sweden’s application to register the name ‘Bruna bönor från Öland’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 46, 24.2.2010, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SWEDEN

Bruna bönor från Öland (PGI)

---
Amendment to Vice Chairman Agreement dated as of May 19, 2005



 Exhibit 10.62 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 VICE CHAIRMAN AGREEMENT 
 FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of May 19, 2005 (the “First Amendment”) to the Vice Chairman Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of
April 25, 2001, between NICHOLAS L. RIBIS (“Ribis”) and COLONY RIH ACQUISITIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend Section 2.01 of the Agreement as more fully set
forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and in
consideration of the agreements herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein,
capitalized terms in this First Amendment have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Amendment. Section 2.01 of
the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “2.01 Subject to and effective upon consummation of
the RIH Acquisition, the Company hereby engages Ribis, and Ribis hereby agrees to provide services to the Company for the period commencing on the date of consummation of the RIH Acquisition (the “Effective Date”) and terminating on
June 1, 2006 (as the same may be extended as set forth below, the “Term”), unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties; provided, that the period of employment shall automatically be extended for successive one
(1) year periods if neither party has provided six (6) months prior written notice to the other of its intention to have this Agreement lapse at the expiration of the Term; and provided further, that the Term shall be subject to earlier
termination in accordance with Articles III, IV and V below.” 
 3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and governed
by the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to conflicts of laws principles thereof which might refer such interpretations to the laws of a different state or jurisdiction. 
 4. Full Force and Effect of Agreement. Except as specifically amended herein, all other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms. All references in the Agreement to “this Agreement” shall be deemed to refer to the Agreement as amended by this First Amendment. 
 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (including by facsimile), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of
which shall constitute the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the date
first above written. 
  

			
	 RESORTS INTERNATIONAL HOTEL
 AND CASINO, INC.
(f/k/a Colony RIH
 Acquisitions, Inc.)

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.

	Name:	 	Thomas J. Barrack, Jr.
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board
		
		 	 /s/ Nicholas L. Ribis

		 	Nicholas L. Ribis
#### COM. v. ORTIZ, I.

3397 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/18/2017

CP-39-CR-0003263-2003

(Lehigh)

Affirmed
#### Com. v. Rouse

10/07/2015

439 EAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1133
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF CHEMFIRST INC.


                                                        JURISDICTION OF
COMPANY NAME                                              ORGANIZATION

Burmar Chemical, Inc. .................................     California
CEM Investment, Inc. ..................................     Mississippi
ChemFirst Fine Chemicals, Inc. ........................     Pennsylvania
ChemFirst Foundation, Inc. ............................     Mississippi
ChemFirst Texas, Inc. .................................     Texas
EKC Technology, Inc. ..................................     California
EKC Technology International, Inc. ....................     California
EKC Technology K K ....................................     Japan
EKC Technology Limited ................................     Scotland
FCC Acquisition Corporation ...........................     California
FEC Marketing, Inc. ...................................     Texas
First Chemical Corporation ............................     Mississippi
First Chemical Corporation dba ChemFirst
   Fine Chemicals......................................     Mississippi
First Chemical Holdings, Inc. ........................     Mississippi
First Chemical Texas, L.P. ............................     Delaware
FRM International, Inc. ...............................     U.S. Virgin Islands
FT Chemical, Inc. .....................................     Texas
Micropel, Inc. ........................................     California
Mycosil, Inc. .........................................     California
TriQuest, L.P. ........................................     Delaware
TriQuest Japan K K ....................................     Japan
No. 12-8389.

#### Woods *v.*Maryland (two judgments).

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1319]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Division 
of Extramural Activities; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 25, 1998.
    Time: 8 a.m.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, 2101 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20007.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul Sheehy, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, 7550 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Room 9C10, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9223.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate one grant application.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.853, Clinical 
Research Related to Neurological Disorders; No. 93.854, Biological 
Basis Research in the Neurosciences)

    Dated: January 13, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-1319 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 12-8599.

#### Funes *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_str_fuel/html/fig02.html 1/1

ELECTRICITY

OVERVIEW DATA ANALYSIS & PROJECTIONS GLOSSARY › FAQS ›

Home > Electricity > NERC Regions

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Regions

North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Regions

FRCC - Florida Reliability Coordinating Council

MRO - Midwest Reliability Organization

NPCC - Northeast Power Coordinating Council

RFC - ReliabilityFirst Corporation

SERC - SERC Reliability Corporation

SPP - Southwest Power Pool, RE

TRE - Texas Regional Entity

WECC - Western Electricity Coordinating Council

Note: The Alaska Systems Coordinating Council (ASCC) is an affiliate NERC member.

Source: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
No. 12-6877.

#### Stroud *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-7694.

#### Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-8023.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

+q‘pnorable

Wm. PO Dar16 @hl ty hII*

tor Ellis 

## aounty lamhaehie? Texas Deir Yri Dariu 0pi.n1on Ilo* o-7199



## for is as tier c on l truati

Tour request ior axI oplni follormr
*I would 

### l

ppreaiatev inion am to whioh aountyr if of fees to a 0011 ined below

eases in a murder ught to me by **the** oonOR 8 elear picture of opinion on the matter, neither for papmnt of aomts for senioe ould the **aonmtable r&me**  **to** perform dmilar oamem whioh may some **up? ’**  On aereraloooadons thin Department**has** aonstrued subdlvi6ion (b) of Se&ion l? of SenateBill 6 of' the 44th Leglmlatare, Seoond Called Seanion , which mabdirlsion, insofar ao psrtinent, is as follon~r

*In oountlem**wherein** the oounty offioersnamed in this lot are aompenuted on the banis of an an-

## 804

~naal wlam, the Nate 

## or Tuam *all not be ehargeQrltb anQ &all not par m7 fee or eomui8don to aar pree!lnot offkoer far any merriaea bj him performed, but UiQ otfiaer ohall be paid by tho **dowty** out of the **Oifiaers ’**  8a1- iry **Furid** auoh fees and wmmisdono as roulQ 'etheni~e be paid hia by the Hate far mah O&VlOO*." : It ke slwr from this. l tatuto~th8tthe atate or fwr im not'liaWe tar the iee~s ~Olaim8Q bl t&4 ';WnrtsbleOC Rllim tlOtmfJ -- twt oeuntf **boig** a a ~818~ bash ?er its oirioors, but that lL111s~C!eunt~ ir 1f **abh** k,,@lm for ,aeh pafhat out ei the 

### Ot?teeri'

Ilrlary FuM'the preeiarteffierm bo&~g 01.8 tee bador

a8 l ppeare~fm reportm in ,the Btate 

### AuQlter”~e eftieo. Thb Departmmt Ma aosmimtmtly aQbomQ te'that eenmtslretihr 

### o?:thb l

tatuto. 

### (Bee Qpfnia 0 t000 '0488i U4168i, O-618 w O-88001 oeplw of w&leh are lttaohbdhereto) Wem what re.ba?* dQr it tolXeTr it ie aot a*oeP ~8x7 to wmor pmr eWOnQ wbe8tioa.

ltnalosurem
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

|                                                      |  |                       
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                              |  | Dated: August 14, 2012
|                                                      |  |                       
|Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                  |  |                       
|Executive Vice President and
 Chief Financial Officer |  |                       
|(principal financial and accounting officer)          |  |                       

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by Siebert
Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

23

---