alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VIII

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1335

For the relief of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Committee discharged

A BILL

For the relief of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. The Secretary of the Treasury is author4 ized and directed to pay to the Menominee Indian Tribe

5 of Wisconsin, out of any money in the Treasury of the

6 United States not otherwise appropriated, a sum equal to

7 the damages sustained by the Menominee Indian Tribe of

8 Wisconsin by reason of—
2

S 1335 CDS

1 (a) the enactment and implementation of the

2 Act of June 17, 1954 (68 Stat. 250), as amended,

3 and

4 (b) the mismanagement by the United States of

5 Menominee assets held in trust by the United States

6 prior to April 30, 1961, the effective date of termi7 nation of Federal supervision of the Menominee In8 dian Tribe of Wisconsin.

9 SEC. 2. Payment of the sum referred to in section

10 1 shall be in full satisfaction of any claims that the Me11 nominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin may have against the

12 United States with respect to the damages referred to in

13 such section.

Æ
No. 12A600.

#### Hedges et al. *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Application to vacate stay, addressed to Justice Scalia and referred to the Court, denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7226

DAVID WATTLETON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER; ARTHUR F. BEELER;

STEPHEN WILLIAMS; ANGELA WALDEN WEAVER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-772-5-F)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wattleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Wattleton appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reinstate his civil complaint. Our review of the record

discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Wattleton v. Sawyer, No.

CA-02-772-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31

                        RULE 13a-14(a) Certification

I, John Merkent, certify that:

  1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The
Kingsley Coach, Inc.;

  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
financial information included in this report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

  4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

  a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of ths disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

  c)  Disclosed in this report any changes in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

  5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

  a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: October 13, 2005               /s/ John Merkent
                                     -------------------------------------
                                     John Merkent, Chief Executive Officer
                                      and Chief Financial Officer
S. 1777

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To extend the suspended implementation of certain requirements of the food stamp

program on Indian reservations, to suspend certain eligibility requirements for

the participation of retail food stores in the food stamp program, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTING AND STAGGERED ISSUANCE FOR HOUSEHOLDS ON RESERVATIONS.

Section 908(a) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and

Trade Act Amendments of 1991 (Public Law 102–237; 7 U.S.C.

2015 note and 7 U.S.C. 2016 note) is amended by striking ‘‘January

31, 1994’’ both places it appears and inserting ‘‘March 15, 1994’’.

SEC. 2. CONTINUING ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN RETAIL FOOD STORES.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, during the period

beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending on

March 15, 1994, an establishment or house-to-house trade route

that is otherwise authorized to accept and redeem coupons under

the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) on the date

of enactment of this Act may not be disqualified from participation

in the food stamp program solely because the establishment or

trade route does not meet the definition of ‘‘retail food store’’ under

section 3(k)(1) of such Act (7 U.S.C. 2012(k)(1)).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

18:43 Nov 29, 1993 VerDate 16-NOV-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\S1777.ENR bend06
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project Nos. 10865-001 and 11495-000]


Warm Creek Hydro, Inc. and Nooksack River Hydro, Inc.; Notice of 
Site Visit

May 15, 1998.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) has received 
an application for license for the proposed Warm Creek Project No. 
10865 and Clearwater Creek Project No. 11495. The projects are located 
in Whatcom County, Washington.
    The Commission issued a notice to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) on the hydroelectric projects in accordance with the 
National Environmental Policy Act.
    The Commission's staff will visit the project site on Wednesday, 
June 10, 1998. The site visit will begin at 9:00 a.m. at the Acme Cafe 
on Highway 9 in Acme, Washington. Interested individuals, 
organizations, and agencies are invited to attend the site visit to 
gain a better understanding of the proposed projects. People interested 
in attending the site visit should provide their own transportation.
    If you have any questions please contact Tim Looney at (202) 219-
2852.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13485 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### Kellie M. Harrison et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Defendants, and Yan-Yee Yeung et al., Appellants.

[770 NYS2d 90]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Yan-Yee Yeung and Fung Yeung appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 21, 2003, as granted their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff Kellie M. Harrison did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) only to the extent of determining that her injuries did not prevent her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute her usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the occurrence of the injury, and denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment on the ground *683that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury of a permanent nature.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted in its entirety, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The appellants established a prima facie case that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Kellie M. Harrison were not serious through the affirmed medical report of a physician who examined her and concluded that she had no disability.

The physician’s affirmation which the plaintiffs submitted in opposition to the motion for summary judgment diagnosed the injured plaintiff as suffering only from cervical and lumbosacral sprains, which do not rise to the level of serious injuries *(see Keena v Trappen,*294 AD2d 405 [2002]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
330A16

#### Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. Etransmedia Technology, Inc.

Motion to Admit Dana L. Salazar *Pro Hoc Vice*

Allowed 03/24/2017
No. 12-7099.

#### Burwell *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-0600.

#### Burke v. Excalibur Exploration, Inc.

Ashtabula App. No. 2016-A-0041, 2017-Ohio-999. On intervening appellant’s motion to vacate lower courts’ judgments. Motion granted. The judgments are vacated and the cause is remanded to the trial court to determine the necessary parties to this action. On motion to intervene as necessary parties and motion to dismiss by EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-A, L.P., CGAS Properties, L.P., and EnerVest Energy Institutional Fund XI-WI, L.P. Motions denied as moot.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., dissent.
#### Com. v. Rugg

09/29/2015

120 WAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 120 A.3d 387
No. 12-8241.

#### Nichols *v.*Crews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**QUAD M SOLUTIONS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Quad M Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |    |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |

  

 

| Date: May 22, 2020 | By:    | */s/ Pasquale Dileo*                                                   |   |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Name:  | Pasquale Dileo                                                         |   |
|               | Title: | Interim Chief Financial Officer                                        |        |
|               |   | (Interim Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |        |
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Milastar Corporation (the "Company")

on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities

and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis J.

Stevermer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)

or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and results of

operations of the Company.

/s/ Dennis J. Stevermer

---------------------------

Dennis J. Stevermer

Chief Financial Officer

March 12, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I,  Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company, certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metaline Mining& Leasing Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company



Date: May 19, 2005

/s/ Tim Hunt

________________________________

Tim Hunt, Chief Executive Officer
Order entered September 8, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00850-CR

TYREN DESHUN PHILLIPS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-57777-H

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Crystal R. Jones’s September 6, 2016 request for an 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The time to file the reporter’s record is extended 

to October 6, 2016.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Montana Natural Gas Exports (No Intransit Deliveries)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Montana Natural Gas Exports (No Intransit Deliveries)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 162    | 136    | 127    | 178    | 90     | 40     | 39     | 82    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 75     | 41     | 14     | 106    | 3,087  |        |        |        |        | 1,510 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,606  | 2,978  | 16,036 | 8,889  | 23,379 | 19,159 | 21,245 | 20,420 | 16,399 | 12,504
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9,437  | 6,826  | 4,332  | 2,353  | 891    | 35     | 0      | 0      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Benita Collins, Respondent, v Nate Tours Bus Co. et al., Defendants, and Swift River Transportation, Ltd., Appellant.

[52 NYS3d 40]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered on or about March 16, 2016, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff slipped and fell as she boarded a bus, denied the motion of defendant Swift River Transportation, Ltd. (Swift River) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

The court erred in denying Swift River’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s claim that Swift River negligently allowed a slippery condition to persist on the stairs leading into the bus was precluded, as a matter of law, by plaintiff’s testimony that it was raining at the time of the accident *(see Byrne v New York City Tr. Auth.,*78 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2010]). “Defendant is not obligated to provide a constant remedy for the tracking of water onto a bus during an ongoing storm” *(Morazzani v MTA N.Y. City Tr.,*67 AD3d 598, 598 [1st Dept 2009]), and here, the evidence showed that plaintiff was the last of a group of people to board the bus during the rainstorm *(see e.g. Duncan v New York City Tr. Auth.,*260 AD2d 213 [1st Dept 1999]).

Concur — Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and Webber, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1802

For the relief of Johnson Chestnut Whittaker.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

For the relief of Johnson Chestnut Whittaker.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REQUEST FOR POSTHUMOUS APPOINTMENT AS

4 A COMMISSIONED OFFICER IN THE ARMY.

5 The President is urged and requested to appoint

6 posthumously Johnson Chestnut Whittaker of South

7 Carolina as a commissioned officer in the regular Army

8 in the grade of second lieutenant as recompense for the

9 unjust separation of the said Johnson Chestnut Whittaker

10 from the Corps of Cadets of the United States Military

11 Academy and from the Army in the early 1880s.
2

•S 1802 IS

1 SEC. 2. BENEFITS.

2 No monetary benefits shall accrue by reason of action

3 taken in accordance with the request in section 1.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1790 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1790

           ``The National Peace Garden Reauthorization Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 1994

  Mr. Bumpers introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           ``The National Peace Garden Reauthorization Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PEACE GARDEN.

    (a) Notwithstanding section 10(b) of Public Law 99-652, as amended 
(40 U.S.C. 1010(b)), the authority of the National Peace Garden to 
establish the garden known as the ``Peace Garden'' in accordance with 
Public Law 100-63 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note) shall expire on June 30, 1997.
    (b)(1) The Congress finds that the Peace Garden Project, 
Incorporated, has changed its name to the National Peace Garden.
    (2) Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or 
other record of the United States to the Peace Garden Project, 
Incorporated shall be deemed to be a reference to the National Peace 
Garden.

                                 <all>
```
#### Com. v. Anglade

03/30/2016

894 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 485