alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010097EN.01000101.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 97/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 97/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 316/2010

of 16 April 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pommes des Alpes de Haute Durance (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Pommes des Alpes de Haute Durance’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Pommes des Alpes de Haute Durance’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 April 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 199, 25.8.2009, p. 19.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Pommes des Alpes de Haute Durance (PGI)

---
No. 12-8342.

#### Plaza-Andrades *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EPA Meeting with Region 5 Tribes February 21, 2012

EPA Region 5 staff participated in the Region 5 Tribal Environmental Program Management Conference. EPA staff led the break out session titled “Proposed New Federal Requirements for Underground Storage Tanks.” The main focus of this session was on the pr oposed underground storage tank rules. The discussion also included a quick review of the current rules and a brief
summary of tank and compliance data on tribal lands. EPA distributed the document “Comparison Of 1988 UST Regulations And Proposed UST Reg ulations” dated October 2011 which is on EPA OUST’s website.

**Attendees:** EPA Mark Restaino, EPA Region 5 Gary Westefer, EPA Region 5 Laura Lodisio, EPA Region 5 Ed Fairbanks, EPA Region 5

BIA Scott Doig, BIA, MRO Fred Vandeventer, BIA

Tribes Victoria Flowers, Oneida Tribes Thurlow McClellan, Grand Traverse Band Tara Geshick, Bois Forte Band Kristen Hanson, Lac du Flambeau Band Kevin Gunderson, Ho

- Chunk Nation Tina VanZile, Sokaogon Chippewa Community Dee Ann Allen May o, Lac du Flambeau Band Brad Frazie r, Prairie Island Indian Community Katherine Krusi, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Char Spruce, Keweenaw Bay I ndian Community L. Scott Wieting, Hannahville Indian Community Michael Whitt, Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community David Smith, Fond Du Lac Lauren Harmen, Oneida Tribes Scott Hansen, Mille Lacs Band John L e Balnc Red Lake Band Bruce Haapala, Lac Vieux Desert Chippewa Melissa Po rter, Grand Traverse Band Rebecca Harbison, Li ttle Traverse Bay Band Stan Ellison , Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
#### In the Matter of Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation, Respondent-Appellant. Pamela Carvel et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 392]

— In a proceeding, inter alia, to enforce the terms of a reciprocal agreement and to enjoin the transfer of funds, (1) Pamela Carvel appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, S.), dated June 21, 2001, as granted those branches of the motion of Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation which were to dismiss the second counterclaim and the second, ninth, thirteenth, fourteenth, sixteenth, and eighteenth affirmative defenses asserted in the answer, (2) Leonard M. Ross separately appeals from stated portions of the same order, and (3) Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from (a) stated portions of a decision of the same court dated March 30, 2001, and (b) so much of the order dated June 21, 2001, as denied those branches of its motion which were to dismiss the first counterclaim and the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, twelfth, and twentieth affirmative defenses asserted in -the answer. Justice McGinity has been substituted for the late Justice O’Brien *(see*22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the appeals and the cross appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal by Leonard M. Ross must be dismissed for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court *(see 22*NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]).

The cross appeal from the decision must be dismissed as no appeal lies from a decision *(see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp.,*100 AD2d 509 [1984]).

The appeal by Pamela Carvel and the cross appeal by Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation from the order dated June 21, *8702001, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with entry of a decree on July 8, 2002 *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal and the cross appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the decree *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *Matter of Carvel,*2 AD3d 847 [2003] [decided herewith]). Krausman, J.P., McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
### NUMBER 1 3

- 12

- 003 19

- CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOHN RENE RODRIGUEZ , A ppellant ,
v. KELLY E. WILDES , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 24th District Court of C alhoun County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices B enavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, John Rene Rodriguez , filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the
24th District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, in cause number 11

- 8

- 1419 . The parties have filed a n amended agreed m otion to dismiss with prejudice on grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been fully compromised and settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss this case with prejudice

.2

The Court, having considered the documen ts on file and the amended agreed motion to dismiss with prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The amended agreed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 18th day of October , 201 2

.
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Massachusetts Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Massachusetts Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 15     | 14    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 11     | 12     | 0      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 10.1**

**NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION GRANT**

**FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS**

**Granted Under**

**MILLIPORECORPORATION 1999 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**(Amended and Restated April 26, 2006)**

Stock Option granted by Millipore Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) to [***First Name, Last Name***] (the“Optionee”), pursuant to the Millipore Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 

It is understood and agreedthat the following terms and conditions shall govern the option: 

**1. Grant of Option.** This certificate evidences the grant by the Company on[***Grant Date***] to the Optionee of an option to purchase, in whole or in part, on the terms herein provided, a total of [***Number of shares***] shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Shares”) at $[***Closingshare price on date prior to Grant Date***] per Share. The Final Exercise Date of this option (as that term is used in the Plan) is [***date ten years after Grant Date***]. 

This option is exercisable in the following installments prior to the Final Exercise Date: 

[***Vestingschedule***] 

**2. Exercise of Option.** Each election to exercise this option shall be in writing, signed by the Optionee or by theOptionee’s executor or administrator or the person or persons to whom this option is transferred by will or the applicable laws of descent and distribution (the “Legal Representative”), and received by the Company at its principaloffice, accompanied by this certificate and payment in full as provided in the Plan. The purchase price may be paid by delivery of cash, certified check, bank draft, money order, or other payment medium approved by the Company. In the event thatthis option is exercised by the Optionee’s Legal Representative, the Company shall be under no obligation to deliver Shares hereunder unless and until the Company is satisfied as to the authority of the person or persons exercising this option.

**3. Non-Transferability of Option.** This option is not transferable by the Optionee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, andis exercisable during the Optionee’s lifetime only by the Optionee. 

**4. Provisions of the Plan.** This option is subject to the provisions of thePlan. 

**5. Special Provisions.** This option is automatically subject to the “Special Exercise Period” providedunder the Plan (without further consent of the Company) if the Optionee’s services as a director terminate due to retirement at age 72 or such other age as the Board of Directors may determine from time to time. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this option to be executed under its corporate seal by its duly authorized officer. This option shall takeeffect as a sealed instrument. 

Very truly yours, 

**MILLIPORE CORPORATION**

 
By: 
 
  [Authorized Officer]
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|No chart available.                                           
|No chart available.                                           
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Kansas Natural Gas International Receipts (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019177EN.01005801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/58 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9328 — Platinum Equity Group/Multi-Color Corporation)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 177/07)

1.

On 8 May 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019177EN.01005801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Platinum Equity Group (United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Multi-Color Corporation (United States). |

Platinum Equity Group (‘Platinum Equity’) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Multi-Color Corporation (‘MCC’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Platinum Equity: merger, acquisition and operation of companies that provide services and solutions to customers in a broad range of businesses, including information technology, telecommunication, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution,

—   for MCC: manufacture and supply of labels to commercial customers across a range of sectors, including: home and personal care, food and beverage, healthcare, specialty, consumer durables, and wine and spirits.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019177EN.01005801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9328 — Platinum Equity Group/Multi-Color Corporation

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019177EN.01005801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019177EN.01005801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
No. 12-6273.

#### Bedzhanyan *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

17 

CA 15-00443 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

MARIA A. LEGGO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MARTIN J. LEGGO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

VENZON LAW FIRM PC, BUFFALO (JAMES P. RENDA OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County

(Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered June 11, 2014 in a divorce action. 

The judgment, among other things, directed defendant to pay

maintenance to plaintiff. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


<PAGE>   2
[COOPERS & LYBRAND LETTERHEAD]

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS-UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM

To the Board of Directors of
IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries

We have examined the assertion by IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries'
management about compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31,
1996 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is
responsible for IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries' compliance with those
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accounts and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries' compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries' compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as
of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

                                                /s/ Coopers & Lybrand LLP
 

Tampa, Florida
February 21, 1997


<PAGE>   3
[IMC MORTGAGE LETTERHEAD]




As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same
period, IMC Mortgage Company And Subsidiaries had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amount of $7,000,000.


                                 /s/ Thomas G. Middleton
                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 Thomas G. Middleton,  President and Chief
                                         Operating Officer

                                 /s/ Stuart D. Marvin
                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 Stuart D. Marvin, Chief Financial Officer
6112112

Docket Management Facility Attn: Comments to Docket No. FAA-2012-0350 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave SE, Rm W12-140 Washington DC, :20590
Re: DocketNumber FAA-2012-0350
Dear Sir/Madam:
I would like to address my comments inregards to docket number FAA-2012- 0350. I am a private pilot with over 900 hours. I own and operate a Cessna and fly about 100 hours a year for business and pleasure. This privilege allows me to save so much time inmy travels to ourbusiness projects. I am a very fit and healthy man and work diligently on a daily basis to keep my fitness a top priority inmy life.
I atn asking youto please create an exemptionto FAA 61-23 which currently requires that all pilots hold at least a third class medical certificate to allow inits place the privilege ofa private orrecreational certificate. I believe the proposedrecurrent online educationprogram will provide a greater level ofknowledge to do self assessments ofour fitness and increase our safety. This additional education along with a valid driver's license showing proofofbasic health can sufficiently replace the current 3rd class medical certificates for recreational flying. According to an ASI study oflight sport aircraft, accidents from 2004-2011 has shownno accidents were attributable to pilot medical deficiency.
We need General Aviationto stay strong as it supports our airports and communities. I believe this exemptionwould encourage pilots to remain active and healthy and continue to fly safely. Sincerely,

Randy Clark 16531 13th Ave. W. #A107 Lynnwood, WA 98037 rcselect@aol.com (206)963-3787