alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11 , 202 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 2

- 00 215

- CV

JOHN F. DIETZ , Appellant

V. 4J ENERGY, LLC AND E NERGIA INER S. DE R. L. DE CV , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 68508

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed December 27, 2021 dismissing appellee 4J Energy, LLC’s (“4J Energy”) claims against John F. Dietz without prejudice

. The appellate record reflects that when that order was signed, 4J Energy’s claim against appellee Energia Iner S. de R.L. de CV (“Energia”) for fraud remained pending, as did appellant John F. Dietz’s cross

- claim against Energia for reimburseme nt and indemnification. That order is accordingly not an appealable final judgment, and the appellate record does not reflect that the trial court has otherwise issued an2

appealable final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 (Tex. 2 001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). The appealed

from order also lacks any apparent basis for being immediately appealable. See
CMH Homes v. Perez , 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the general rule that “interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable”).

On September 15 , 2022, this court informed the parties of the apparent lack of jurisdiction over this appeal and warned them that the appeal was subject to
dismissal without further notice unless any party demonstrated this court had jurisdiction. The parties filed no r esponse to the letter. Accordingly, due to the lack of any basis for exercising jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
No. 12-6513.

#### Spencer *v.*Kirkland, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-713.

#### Bell *v.*Washington Hospital Center.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7426.

#### Huebler *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,279   | 11,049  | 8,142  | 0      | 2,664  | 5,533  | 10,629 | 17,648 | 35,645 | 54,298
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 111,908 | 307,714 | 71,998 | 38,595 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7782.

#### Riggs *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries

Arab American Express Company Ltd., a Jordanian company, 100% owned.

Secretarial and Business Services Co. (Aramex) L.L.C., organized under laws of
Dubai, 100% owned.

Arabian Express Courier, a subsidiary of Al Khalidia International Group of
Companies, organized under the laws of Abu Dhabi, 100% owned.

Almana Trading Company, organized under the laws of Qatar, 100% owned.

Yusuf Bin Ahmed Kanoo W.L.L., organized under the laws of Bahrain, 100% owned.

Al-Awsat International Transport Company, Ltd., a Saudi Arabian company, 50%
partnership interest.

Aramex International Courier France, a French company, 100% owned.

Aramex (U.K.) International Courier, Ltd., organized under the laws of the
United Kingdom, 100% owned.

Aramex International Courier of VA., Inc., organized under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, 100% owned.

Aramex International Courier, Ltd., organized under the laws of New York, 100%
owned.

Global Venture Group for Trading, organized under the laws of Kuwait, 100%
owned.

Aramex (Hellas) International S.A., a Greek company, 100% owned.

Aramex International Limited, Israel, organized under the laws of Israel, 100%
owned.

Ramallah Modern International Express Transport Co., organized under the laws
of the Palestinian Authority, 51% partnership interest.

Aramex International Limited, a Hong Kong company, 100% owned.

Middle East Direct Marketing Services Holding Limited, organized under the
laws of the Isle of Jersey, 80% equity ownership interest.

Fallouh for Trade and Express Shipping, organized under the laws of Syria, 60%
partnership interest.

Aramex International Courier Inc.-Canada, organized under the laws of Canada,
19.5% partnership interest.

Aramex SARL, organized under the laws of Lebanon, 50% partnership interest.

Arab American Express Company, organized under the laws of Lebanon, 50%
partnership interest.

Aramex International Ltd./Ariha organized under the laws of the Palestinian
Authority, 100% owned.

Arab American Clearance & Transport Company, a Jordanian company, 90%
partnership interest.

Aramex International Egypt, organized under the laws of Egypt, 100% owned.

Aramex Int'l Hava Kargo Ve Kurye A.S., organized under the laws of Turkey, 50%
partnership interest.

Intercontinental Express Ltd., organized under the laws of Bangladesh, 50%
partnership interest.

Aramex Couriers India Private Ltd., organized under the laws of India, 50%
partnership interest.

Aramex-Airborne Freight Corporation Lanka (Pvt) Ltd., organized under the laws
of Sri Lanka, 50% partnership interest.

Aramex-Airborne Lanka Private Ltd., organized under the laws of Sri Lanka, 50%
partnership interest.

Aramex Cyprus Ltd., organized under the laws of Cyprus, 100% owned.

Safricour Company, organized under the laws of Morocco, 70% partnership
interest.

Arab Express Services, organized under the laws of Jordan, 83.5% owned.
No. 12-961.

#### Bayou Steel Corp. et al. *v.*National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlin Batista, Appellant.

[48 NYS3d 581]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jill Konviser, J.), rendered November 25, 2014, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of gang assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. An accomplice witness’s testimony was amply corroborated by surveillance videotapes and other evidence.

The court correctly denied defendant’s request to charge second-degree gang assault as a lesser included offense, because there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, that he took part in the attack on the victim but only intended to cause ordinary physical injury instrument *(see People v Rivera,*23 NY3d 112, 120-121 [2014]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Mazzarelli and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Millipore Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned, Francis J. Lunger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kathleen B. Allen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his or her knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    FRANCIS J.
LUNGER*                              
|Francis J. Lunger President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                       
|November 7, 2003                                       



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    KATHLEEN B.
ALLEN*                                   
|Kathleen B. Allen Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                            
|November 7, 2003                                            



*A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Millipore Corporation and will be retained by Millipore Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 12-8031.

#### Meszaros *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as Amended by Public Law 104-13; 
Proposed Collection, Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Proposed Collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Wilma H. McCauley, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (WR 4Q), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-2523. Comments should be sent to the Agency Clearance 
Officer no later than July 21, 1998.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Title of Information Collection: Power Distributor Monthly & Annual 
Reports to TVA.
    Frequency of Use: Monthly and Annual.
    Type of Affected Public: Business or Local Government.
    Small Businesses or Organizations Affected: Yes.
    Federal Budget Functional Category Code: 271.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 2,067.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,816.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: 1.8 hours.
    Need For and Use of Information: This information collection 
supplies TVA with financial and accounting information to help ensure 
that electric power produced by TVA is sold to consumers at rates which 
are as low as feasible.
William S. Moore,
Senior Manager, Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 98-13660 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
#### Madelyn Keys, Appellant, v Triangle Maintenance Corp., Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[767 NYS2d 901]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated November 18, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]). In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the plaintiff failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., supra).*

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. McGinity, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, T.C. Leung, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 20-F of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin the report;

 

4.             The Company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.             The company’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

----

 

(a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:   June 27, 2008 |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                 |
|                                 |
|                                 | /s/ T.C. Leung |
|                                 | T.C. Leung |
|                                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AAM-12-204-E 

March 23, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10486 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0103 

Mr. Jason Snyder 

Inland Helicopters 

5505 East Rutter Avenue 

Spokane, WA 99212 

Dear Mr. Snyder: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated January 20, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Inland Helicopters for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Inland Helicopters to cover its safetysensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program while operating under 

separate parts of the regulation. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Inland Helicopters. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Inland Helicopters an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Inland Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive employees under 

one drug and alcohol testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation, 

subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Inland Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Inland Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Niagara Falls, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Niagara Falls, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 8  
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 15  | 18  | 7   | 16  | 18  | 19  | 8   | 8   | 20 
|2022                                                                                                                              | 13  | 4   |     | 15  | 8   | 8   |     |     |     | 19  |     | 8  
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     | 7   | 7   | 7   | 17  | 8   | 8   | 16  |     | 7   | 7  
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 8   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024