alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1313

SABRINA RENEE BROWN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. THE WALT DISNEY STUDIOS; DISNEY MUSIC GROUP , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:17

- cv
- 00041

- RAJ

- DEM )

Submitted : May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ , THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded with instructions by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sabrina Renee Brown , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Sabrina Renee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s orde r dismissing her ci vil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 47 (1949). Because it is possible that Brown could cure the defects in her complaint through amendment, the order she seeks to app eal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619,
623

- 25, 628

- 30 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

– 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Brown to file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM UNITED
CAPITAL  CORP.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER  ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES, THERETO.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                      16,115
<SECURITIES>                                                20,756
<RECEIVABLES>                                                8,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   390
<INVENTORY>                                                  4,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            49,333
<PP&E>                                                      10,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                               5,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             133,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       24,791
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       501
<OTHER-SE>                                                  56,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               133,065
<SALES>                                                      7,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            14,713
<CGS>                                                        5,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               11,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            (1,183)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              4,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          2,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 2,576
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  .51


</TABLE>
No. 12-7222.

#### In re Gregory.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03018

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03018\03018_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03018\03018_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03018\03018_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03018\03018_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03018\03018_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03018\03018_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03018\03018_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03018\03018_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03018\Certification Statement Plant ID 03018.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03018\Supplemental Documents\03018_Completed Diagram D-1 and D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03018\Supplemental Documents\03018_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03018\Supplemental Documents\03018_PartD All ponds WWT.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03018\Supplemental Documents\03018_Question Number C2-31 updated.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03018\Supplemental Documents\Completed Diagram WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03018\Supplemental Documents\Completed MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03018\Supplemental Documents\Completed MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1334]

[[Page 3154]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

Receipt of Petition for Federal Acknowledgment of Existence as an 
Indian Tribe

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is published in the exercise of authority delegated by 
the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary--Indian 
Affairs by 209 DM 8.
    Pursuant to 25 CFR 83.9(a), notice is hereby given that the 
Gabrielino/Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council, 5450 Slauson 
Avenue, Suite 151, Culver City, California 90230, has filed a letter of 
intent to petition for acknowledgment by the Secretary of the Interior 
that the group exists as an Indian tribe. The petition was received by 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) on August 14, 1997, and was signed 
by members of the group's governing body.
    This is a notice of receipt of a letter of intent to petition and 
does not constitute notice that the petition is under active 
consideration. Notice of active consideration will be sent by mail to 
the petitioner and other interested parties at the appropriate time.
    Under Section 83.9(a) of the Federal regulations, interested 
parties may submit factual and/or legal arguments in support of or in 
opposition to the group's petition. Any information submitted will be 
made available on the same basis as other information in the BIA's 
files. Such submissions will be provided to the petitioner upon receipt 
by the BIA. The petitioner will be provided an opportunity to respond 
to such submissions prior to a final determination regarding the 
petitioner's status.
    The petition may be examined, by appointment, in the Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Branch of Acknowledgment and 
Research, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. Phone: (202) 208-
3592.

    Dated: January 12, 1998.
Hilda A. Manuel,
Deputy Commissioner of Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-1334 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
```
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.02   | --     | 11.57  | 5.86   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Harrington, In re Estate of

07/19/2016

156 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 136 A.3d 1038
No. 12-8122.

#### Bibbs *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 7th Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 5637-003]


Pancheri Inc.; Availability of Environmental Assessment

May 14, 1998.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA is for an application to amend the Pancheri Hydroelectric 
Project. The application is to rehabilitate the existing project by 
upgrading the existing pipe water conveyance system and building a new 
powerhouse. The EA finds that approval of the application would not 
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment. The Pancheri Hydroelectric Project is located 
on the Sawmill Creek in Butte County, Idaho.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, Room 2A, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Copies can also be obtained by calling 
the project manager listed below. For further information, please 
contact the project manager, Jean A. Potvin, at (202) 219-0022.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13361 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. D-2704.

#### In re Discipline of Golden.

Bruce P. Golden, of Chicago, Ill., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy J. Nolan, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 853]

Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chenango County (Sullivan, J.), rendered July 29, 2002, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

In October 2001, the victim’s grandmother reported to police that defendant had molested the victim, who was 10 years old at the time. The victim gave a written statement to the police and was examined at a hospital. Police Detective Murray Roach called defendant in for questioning and defendant ultimately signed a confession prepared by Roach. Thereafter, defendant was charged with the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree *(see*Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to *51⁄2*years in prison. Defendant appeals, asserting that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that the confession was not sufficiently corroborated. We disagree.

*1222In order to sustain a conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree, the People were required to establish that defendant subjected the 10-year-old victim to “sexual contact” (Penal Law § 130.00 [3]; § 130.65 [3]). Here, defendant’s confession describing that sexual contact and his gratification in detail sufficiently established his culpability *(see People v Safian,*46 NY2d 181, 186 [1978], *cert denied sub nom. Miner v New York,*443 US 912 [1979]; *People v Barcomb,*256 AD2d 926, 927 [1998], *lv denied*94 NY2d 798 [1999]). While a defendant may not be convicted solely on the basis of a confession without corroborating evidence *(see*CPL 60.50), the statutory requirement is met when the People have presented “ ‘some proof, of whatever weight,’ that the offense charged has in fact been committed by someone” *(People v Booden,*69 NY2d 185, 187 [1987], quoting *People v Daniels,*37 NY2d 624, 629 [1975]). We conclude that the victim’s testimony describing the sexual contact in similar terms to those set forth in the confession, and Roach’s description of defendant’s demeanor and physical manifestations of guilt while giving the statement and shortly after, as well as during a heated phone call with his parents regarding the incident, provide sufficient corroboration of the confession *(see People v Guillery,*260 AD2d 661, 661-662 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 971 [1999]; *People v Barcomb, supra*at 927; *People v Gressler,*235 AD2d 599, 600 [1997], *lv denied*89 NY2d 1036 [1997]; *cf. People v Mc-Auliffe,*220 AD2d 859, 860-861 [1995]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments, including his assertion that the sentence is harsh and excessive, and conclude that they are without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 200 9-0 819

DCN: SE01325A3

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS I NFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
[Cite as State v. Marconet , 2016-Ohio-69.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2015-05-092

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 1/11/2016 : BRADLEY M. MARCONET, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2014-09-1429

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee Charles M. Conliff, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018-0424, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for def endant-appellant, Bradley M. Marconet, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose anyButler CA2015-05-092 errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., S. POWELL and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1739

To suspend temporarily the duty on lambdacyhalothrin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 20 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on lambdacyhalothrin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAMBDACYHALOTHRIN.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 [1α(S*),3α(Z)]-

(±)-cyano-(3-

phenoxyphenyl)-

methyl 3-(2-

chloro-3,3,3-

trifluoro-1-propenyl)-2,2-

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS

No. 91465–08–

6) (provided for

in subheading

2926.90.27) ...... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•S 1739 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to  Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to  Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.92   | 5.29  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.92   | 7.23   | 10.74  | 7.22   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024