alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010234EN.01000301.xml

| 4.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 783/2010

of 3 September 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 September 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 315, 23.12.2009, p. 18.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SPAIN

Queso de Flor de Guía/Queso de Media Flor de Guía/Queso de Guía (PDO)

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13631]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee on Equal Opportunity in Science and Engineering; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act Public Law 
92-463, as amended, the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:


    Name: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and 
Engineering (CEOSE) (1173).
    Date & Time: June 9 (1:00 to 5:30 p.m.), June 10 (8:45-5:00) and 
June 11, 1998, (8:30-3:00).
    Place: Room 1235, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Darryl G. Gorman, Executive Secretary, CEOSE, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Va. 
22230. Phone (703) 306-1391.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the Executive Secretary at the 
above address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on policies and activities of 
the Foundation to encourage full participation of women, minorities, 
and persons with disabilities currently underrepresented in 
scientific, engineering, professional, and technical fields and to 
advise NSF concerning implementation of the provisions of the 
Science and Engineering Equal Opportunities Act.

Agenda

Tuesday June 9: 1:00-500 p.m.

1:00 p.m.  Welcome
    Meeting Rules and Etiquette
    Approval of February 1998 Minutes
1:30 p.m.  CEOSE biannual Congressional Report Workshop:
    Review 1996 report content/recommendations and preparation 
process Design 1998 report:
    (1) objectives; (2) format; (3) schedule; (4) assignments
5:00 p.m.  Finalization of Report outline and Schedule
5:30 p.m.  Adjourn for the day

Wednesday June 10: 8:45 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

8:45 a.m.  Congressional Report--Widder
9:45 a.m.  Break
10:00 a.m.  Assistant to Deputy Director for Human Resource 
Development, HRD Report--Wanda Ward
10:30 a.m.  Directorate Advisory Committee Liaison Reports--CEOSE 
Liaisons
11:00 a.m.  Merit Review Criteria--David Schindel
11:30 a.m.  Digital Library project--Steve Griffin
12:00 a.m.  Working Lunch
1:00 p.m.  Federal Agencies' Best Practices--Castro/Committee
    Guest: Dr. Clifton Poodry, NIH
3:00 p.m.  Capacity building workshop II (2 hours)--Jolly/Committee
5:00 p.m.  Recommendations on capacity-building
5:30 p.m.  Adjourn for the day

Thursday June 11: 8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m.

8:30 a.m.  Chair's report: Marilyn Suiter
9:00 a.m.  Disabilities: Recommendations--Committee
10:00 a.m.  Technology Display--Guest: TARGET Center, Dept. of 
Agriculture
11:00 a.m.  Dr. Joseph Bordogna, Acting Deputy Director, NSF
1:00 p.m.  Updating the ``Strategic/Functional Plan''
2:00 p.m.  Planning the next meeting
3:00 p.m.  Adjourn

    Dated: May 18, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-13631 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
No. 12-8242.

#### Gutierrez-Rodriguez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

CLINTON DRIVER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

THOMAS MCGINLEY AND HONORABLE 

SCOTT DICLAUDIO,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 49 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2022, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. 

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.
EXHIBIT 10(i)(1)
  CONFIRMATION
 To:
    
    CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.800 MANOR PARK DR.COLUMBUS, OH 43228
 Attn:
    
    HERMAN DICKFax:
    
    hfdjr@coremt.comDuplicateConfirm to:
    
    614-870-4027 MICHAEL DEL REGNOClient ID:
    
    1000351556~BOWENFrom:
    
    KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONDate:
    
    18-Dec-08Our Ref:
    
    225536/225536
  1.
    
    The definitions and provisions contained in the 2000 ISDA Definitions (the
Definition) as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association,
Inc. (ISDA) and amended from time to time, are incorporated into this Confirmation.
   2.
    
    This Confirmation constitutes a Rate Swap Transaction under the Swap
Agreement and the terms of the Rate Swap Transaction to which this Confirmation
relates are as follows:
 1




---



##### 



Notional Amount:
    
    $12,000,000.00 USD Amortizing by $142,857.14 per monthTrade Date:
    
    18-Dec-08Effective Date:
    
    01-May-09Termination Date:
    
    01-May-16Fixed Amounts:Fixed Rate Payer:
    
    CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Fixed Rate Payer
Payment Dates:
    
    Commencing 01-Jun-09 and monthly thereafter on the 1st
calendar day of the month up to and including the Termination Date, subject to adjustment in accordance with Following Business Day Convention.Period End Dates:
    
    Monthly on the
1st commencing 01-Jun-09 subject to the No Adjustment.Fixed Rate:
    
    2.29500%Fixed Rate DayCount Fraction:
    
    Act/360Floating Amounts:Floating Rate Payer:
    
    KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONFloating Rate PayerPayment Dates:
    
    Commencing 01-Jun-09 and monthly thereafter on the 1stCalendar day of the month up to and including theTermination Date, subject to adjustment in accordance withFollowing Business Day Convention.Period End Dates:
    
    Monthly on the 1st commencing 01-Jun-09 subject to the NoAdjustment.Floating Rate for
Initial Calculation
Period Including
Spread:
    
    To Be DeterminedFloating Rate Option:
    
    USD-LIBOR-BBADesignated Maturity:
    
    1-MonthSpread:
    
    NoneFloating Rate DayCount Fraction:
    
    Act/360Reset Dates:
    
    The first day of each Floating Rate Payer Calculation Period.
 2




---



##### 



Calculation Agent:
    
    KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBusiness Days:
    
    London and New YorkOther TermsAnd Conditions:
    
    NonePayment Method:
    
    CHECKING ACCOUNTPlease pay us at:
    
    KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONWE DEBIT YOUR CHECKING A/C #014511004013We will pay you at:
    
    KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONWE CREDIT YOUR CHECKING A/C #014511004013
    
 
  /s/ Herman F. Dick, Jr.

Name: Herman F. Dick, Jr.Title: Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
 3
#### Keith v. W.C.A.B. (SEPTA) 69

07/27/2016

108 EAL (2016)

69

. Justice MUNDY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5773 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5773

**Commission Decision of 02/03/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5773 - QATAR PETROLEUM / GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY / PII GROUP) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal 56 , 06/03/2010 P. 0005 - 0005 *

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 02.03.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/2378/9

C(2010)1291

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5773 – QATAR PETROLEUM/ GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY/ PII GROUP Notification of 29.01.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 31, 09.02.2010, p.10.

(1) On 29.01.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the EC Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Al Shaheen Energy Services Company ("ASESC", Qatar), controlled by Qatar Petroleum ("QP", Qatar) and General Electric Company ("GE", USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation joint control of PII Group Ltd ("PII Group", United Kingdom) and PII North America LLC ("PII Group", USA), currently solely controlled by the General Electric Company ("GE", USA) by way of purchase of shares.

(2) The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for QP: exploration, drilling and production operations, transport, storage, marketing and sale of crude oil, refined products, petrochemicals and fertilizers;

- for GE: global, diversified manufacturing, technology and services company;

- for PII Group: worldwide provider of pipeline inspection and integrity services to operators of oil and gas pipelines.

(3) After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

(4) For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the EC Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 05.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          12,487
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                        43
<INVENTORY>                                        208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,743
<PP&E>                                          93,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,281
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,877
<SALES>                                         15,269
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,269
<CGS>                                            6,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,363)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                       946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Theodore Jenkins, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 413]

Appeal from an order of Seneca County Court (Bender, J.), entered April 4, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the indictment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, the motion is denied, the indictment is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Seneca County Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

Memorandum: The People appeal pursuant to CPL 450.20 (1) from an order granting defendant’s motion and dismissing the indictment on the ground that defendant was deprived of due process by a six-month preindictment delay in prosecuting him on a charge of promoting prison contraband in the first degree (Penal Law § 205.25 [2]). Applying the factors identified in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]), we agree with the People that County Court erred in dismissing the indictment *(see People v Vernace,*96 NY2d 886, 887 [2001]; *People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241, 251-253 [1978]; *People v Beyah,*302 AD2d 981 [2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 626 [2003]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the People failed to advance a justifiable excuse for the delay, we note that similar periods of delay have been found to be within constitutional limits *(see People v Lesiuk,*81 NY2d 485, 490-491 [1993] [eight-month delay]; *Beyah,*302 AD2d 981 [2003] [over 12 months]; *People v Irvis,*301 AD2d 782, 784 *1391[2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 655 [2003] [10 months]; *People v Mangan,*258 AD2d 819, 819-820 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 927 [1999] [20 months]; *People v Torres,*257 AD2d 772, 773 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 903 [1999] [19 months]). The charge against defendant was serious, “involv[ing] the safety and security of a correctional facility (see *People v Richardson,*298 AD2d 711, 712 [2002]; *People v Staton,*297 AD2d 876, 877 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 565 [2002])” *(People v Coggins,*308 AD2d 635, 636 [2003]). Moreover, because defendant was already incarcerated on a prior felony conviction, “the delay caused no further curtailment of his freedom” *(Richardson,*298 AD2d at 712; *see Coggins,*308 AD2d at 636; *People v Diaz,*277 AD2d 723, 724 [2000] , *lv denied*96 NY2d 758 [2001]). Finally, we are unable to conclude on the record before us that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay *(see People v Hernandez,*306 AD2d 751, 752 [2003]; *People v Andrade,*301 AD2d 797, 798 [2003]; *Richardson,*298 AD2d at 712). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-QSB**

**QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF**

**THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**MILASTAR CORPORATION**

**(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)**

**DELAWARE**
**(State or other jurisdiction of****incorporation or organization)****13-2636669**
**(I.R.S. Employer****Identification No.)****7317 West Lake Street, Minneapolis, MN****55426**
**(Address of principal executive offices)****(952) 929-4774**
**(Telephone number)**
**Not Applicable**

**Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.**

**Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X  No**

**Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X**

**At March 10, 2007,****2,723,264 shares of common stock of the Registrant were issued and outstanding.**

MILASTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I

**Item 1. Financial Statements**

 The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Milastar Corporation (the "Company") without audit, pursuant tothe rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financialstatements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omittedpursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented notmisleading. Operating results for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected forthe year ending April 30, 2007. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidatedfinancial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006.

 The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, which are unaudited, include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments(consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position and results of operations of the Company forthe periods presented. MILASTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS****ASSETS**
### U NITED 

### S TATES 

### A IR 

### F ORCE



### C OURT OF 

### C RIMINAL 

### A PPEALS

In re Jose A. COSSIO

, Jr. ) Misc. Dkt. No. 202 3

- 0 9

Petitioner )

)

)

) ORDER

)

)

)

) Special Panel

On 3 October 2023, this court received a petition pro se for extraordinary

relief in the nature of a writ of coram v obis in this case. The petition was docketed with this court on 4 October 2023.

It is by the court on this 26th day of October , 2023,

ORDERED:

The petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of cor a m v obis

is hereby DENIED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of DRYCLEAN USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Venerando J. Indelicato, Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 10, 2006

| | /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Venerando J. Indelicato
Principal Financial Officer

23
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2247]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

January 13, 1998.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed by February 5, 1998. See Section 
1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an 
opposition must be filed by February 17, 1998,
    Subject: Rulemaking to Amend Parts 1, 2, 21, and 25 of the 
Commission's Rules to Redesignate the 27.5-29.5 GHz Frequency Band, to 
Reallocate the 29.5-30.0 GHz Frequency Band, to Establish Rules and 
Policies for Local Multipoint Distribution Service and for Fixed 
Satellite Services (CC Docket No. 92-297).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.
    Subject: Amendment of Part 15 of the Commission's Rules to permit 
operation of biomedical telemetry devices on VHF TV channels 7-13 and 
on UHF TV channels 14-46 (ET Docket No. 95-177).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2
    Subject: Access Charge Reform (CC Docket No. 96-262) Price Cap 
Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers (CC Docket No. 94-1) 
Transport Rate Structure (CC Docket No. 91-213).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
    Subject: Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Allotments, FM 
Broadcast Stations. (Florence and Killen, Alabama and Lawrenceburg, 
Tennessee).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
    Subject: Amendment of Section 73.202(b), Table of Assignments, FM 
Broadcast Stations, (Genoa, Mt. Morris, and Oregon, Illinois).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1392 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M