alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




VIASPACE INC.




2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




Amendment




May 18, 2006




This AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) TO THE 2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF VIASPACE INC.
(the “2005 Plan”) is effective as of the date set forth above, pursuant to authority reserved in
Section 13 of the 2005 Plan and the resolutions of the Board of Directors of VIASPACE Inc. (the
“Company”) adopted on May 18, 2006.



NOW, THEREFORE, the 2005 Plan is hereby amended as follows:



1.  AMENDMENT TO SECTION 3(a) OF THE 2005 PLAN. Section 3(a) of the 2005 Plan is deleted in its
entirety and is replaced with the following:



3. Stock Subject to the Plan.



(a) Subject to the provisions of Section 10, below, the maximum aggregate number of Shares which
may be issued pursuant to all Awards (including Incentive Stock Options) is 28,000,000 Shares which
aggregate number of shares, automatically and without further action, shall increase, effective as
of January 1, 2007 and each January 1 thereafter during the term of the Plan, by an additional
number of shares of Common Stock equal to 10% percent of the total number of shares of Common Stock
issued and outstanding as of the close of business on the immediately preceding December 31, which
is the last day of the Company’s fiscal year. The Shares to be issued pursuant to Awards may be
authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.



2.  MISCELLANEOUS. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, all of the terms and
provisions of the 2005 Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has adopted this Amendment as of the 18 day of May, 2006.




VIASPACE INC.




By: /S/ CARL KUKKONEN

Name: CARL KUKKONEN

Title: CEO
No. 12-6806.

#### Brayboy *v.*Napel, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent
to the reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the
Prospectus and to the use of our report dated March 20, 2012, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-179645) of Smart
Trust, Enhanced Value II Trust, Series 4.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


March 20, 2012
2017-0891.

#### State v. Kouts.

Sandusky App. No. S-16-012, 2017-Ohio-2905. On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ entry filed June 23, 2017: “During a plea proceeding, does a trial court’s failure to inform a defendant about the residential restrictions imposed on sex offenders under R.C. Chapter 2950 render the plea invalid?”

The conflict case is *State v. Creed,*8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97317, 2012-Ohio-2627.

It is ordered by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the court of appeals for Sandusky County.

French, J., dissents.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, J. Russell Duncan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 12, 2003/s/ J. RUSSELL DUNCANJ. Russell DuncanChief Executive Officer
Untitled Document



Exhibit 10.3 




DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS


     Healthaxis
Inc.  (the  “Company”)  maintains  a  compensation  program for its
non-employee  directors,  which  is  comprised  of  both  an  equity  and  a  cash
component.  Effective  May 10,  2006,  a new annual  compensation  program  was  approved
for  the  Company’s  non-employee  directors.  Each such  director  receives
annually  a number of shares of  restricted  stock  equal to  approximately  $10,000  in
value,  with  the  chairman  of  each  committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors
receiving  an  additional  25% of  such  number  of  shares  of  restricted  stock  and
the  Chairman  of the Board  receiving  an  additional  50% of such  number  of  shares
of  restricted  stock.  These grants of  restricted  stock vest at  the  rate  of 25%
for  each  of the  four  regular  quarterly  meetings of the Board of Directors and its
committees. 



     With
respect  to  cash  compensation,  non-employee  directors  other  than  the  Chairman  of
the  Board  receive  $1,875 for each  meeting  attended  in  person,  $500 for each
committee  meeting  attended  in  person  when not held on the  same date and at the same
location  as a meeting of the Board  of Directors,  and $250 per hour for  attendance at
telephonic  meetings  (with a  maximum  of $500 per  telephonic  meeting).  The  Chairman
of the Board  receives  $5,675 for each  meeting  of the Board of  Directors  attended
in person,  and $350 per  hour for  attendance  at telephonic  meetings  (with a maximum
of $750 per  telephonic  meeting).  Committee  chairs  and the  lead  director  receive
an  additional  $2,000  per  committee  meeting  attended  in person and $350 per hour
for  attendance  at  telephonic  meetings  (with  a  maximum  of  $750  per  telephonic
meeting).
**EXHIBIT13.1**

C**ertificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), T.C. Leung, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

June28, 2007
|        | /s/T.C. Leung           |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | T.C. Leung              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated March 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincorporated by reference in the Annual Report of DCB Financial Corp (the Company) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of saidreport in the Registration Statements of DCB Financial Corp on Form S-3, filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the Commission) on March 30, 1999, the Company’s Form S-8, filed with theCommission on November 17, 1999, the Company’s Form S-8, filed with the Commission on May 9, 2002,and the Company’s Form S-8, filed with the Commission on June 18, 2004./s/BKD LLPCincinnati, Ohio
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5                  5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                           <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-1998        SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998        SEP-30-1999

<CASH>                            2,529             19,037
<SECURITIES>                          0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,070,741          1,197,237
<ALLOWANCES>                          0                  0
<INVENTORY>                       2,468                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,099,115          1,269,676
<PP&E>                          464,154            769,491
<DEPRECIATION>                   94,863            186,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,646,970          2,362,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           780,880          1,468,441
<BONDS>                               0                  0
<COMMON>                        394,640          1,029,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0                  0
<PREFERRED>                           0                  0
<OTHER-SE>                       97,508           (568,322)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,646,970          2,362,389
<SALES>                       1,134,972          2,008,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,155,119          2,043,234
<CGS>                           394,773            760,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   608,785          2,038,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 13,991             32,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0            111,159
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               57,199            115,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  80,371           (904,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                     26,721           (238,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              53,650           (665,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0                  0

<PAGE>

<CHANGES>                             0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                     53,650           (665,830)
<EPS-BASIC>                       .01               (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .01               (.15)



</TABLE>
No. 12-8045.

#### Brammer *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                             List of Subsidiaries
                             --------------------

Arab American Express Company Ltd., a Jordanian company, 100% owned.

Secretarial and Business Services Co. (Aramex) L.L.C., organized under laws of 
Dubai, 100% owned.

Arabian Express Courier, a subsidiary of Al Khalidia International Group of 
Companies, organized under the laws of Abu Dhabi, 100% owned.

Almana Trading Company, organized under the laws of Qatar, 100% owned.

Arab American Express Co., organized under the laws of Bahrain, 100% owned.

Alawsat International Transport Company, Ltd., a Saudi Arabian company, 100% 
owned.

Aramex International Courier France, a French company, 100% owned.

Aramex (U.K.) International Courier, Ltd., organized under the laws of the 
United Kingdom, 100% owned.

Aramex International Courier of Virginia, Inc., a company organized under the 
laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 100% owned.

Aramex International Inc., a company organized under the laws of New York, 100% 
owned.
 
Global Venture Group, a company organized under the laws of Kuwait, 100% owned.

Aramex (Hellas) International S.A., a Greek company, 100% owned.

Aramex International Limited, Israel, organized under the laws of Israel, 100% 
owned.

Aramex International Limited, a Hong Kong Company, 100% owned.

Middle East Direct Marketing Services Holding Limited, organized under the laws 
Isle of Jersey, 80% equity ownership interest.

Fallouh Trading and Express Shipping, organized under the laws of Syria, 60% 
partnership interest.

                                       1
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Chile (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.35   | 6.27   | --     | 6.96   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00462-CV

IN RE RIGOBERTO TORRES 

FARIAS

RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s “Appellant's Motion For Suspension Of 

Rules.” The motion is GRANTED.

The court has also considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed. Accordingly, relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 10, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 103 (Friday, May 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29389-29390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14201]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-560-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

May 22, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 18, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation

[[Page 29390]]

(Columbia), 12801 Fair Lake Parkway, Fairfax, Virginia 22030-1046, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-560-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon by retirement 
approximately 0.04 mile of 2-inch pipeline and one delivery point to 
Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. (CPA), located in Fulton County, 
Pennsylvania, under Columbia's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP83-76-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Columbia proposes to abandon transmission line 10033, consisting of 
0.04 mile of 2-inch pipeline and appurtenances and one point of 
delivery to CPA, all located in Fulton County, Pennsylvania. Columbia 
declares the section of Line 10033 for which abandonment authority is 
requested is a 2-inch transmission pipeline that has provided service 
to CPA, thereby enabling CPA to serve the Kirk Motel, that now has been 
converted to residential sites and is served by CPA. Columbia states 
that CPA has recently constructed approximately 1,100 feet of 2-inch 
plastic pipeline to serve this point of delivery (POD) and thereby 
eliminated the need for Columbia's Line 10033 and the associated Kirk 
Motel POD.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursaunt to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-14201 Filed 5-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel and Truck (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel and Truck (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | -      |        | 15.69  | 7.54   | 4.72   | 4.69   | 5.20   | 5.20  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.64   | 7.62   | 12.24  | 7.57   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LUCKNER PIERRE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-71

[March 8, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2010-CF-002859-AXXX-MB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres, Special 

Assistant Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional 

Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 12-6766.

#### Anderson *v.*Oldham, Sheriff, Shelby County, Tennessee.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**The undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:**

(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date:September 13, 2005 |  | /s/ M. G. DUNCAN       
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | M. G. Duncan           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

|Date:September 13, 2005 |  | /s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMER
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | Dennis J. Stevermer    
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer