alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lea Michelle MCGINNIS, Appellant, v. Matthew IRWIN, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4192

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 19, 2018

Richard J. Feinberg, of Law Office of Richard J., Feinberg, Indialantic, for Appellant.

Jonathan R,. Simon, of The Orlando Family Firm, Orlando, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees. On remand, the lower court shall make findings of fact regarding Appellant’s need and Appellee’s ability to pay fees and award such' fees as are warranted based on those findings. *See Henderson v. Henderson,*162 So.3d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Panama (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Panama (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 6.80 |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2019                                                                                                                              |     | W   | W   |     |      | W   |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |      |     |     |     | W   |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 10.46

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	
Effective   Date: February 29, 2012
    	
Amount RMB1,301,686.17
    


 

PROMISE TO PAY.  Lianhui Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (the “Company”) promises to pay to the order of Beijing Shenzhou Deke Technology Development Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Lender”) RMB1,301,686.17 (the “Indebtedness”).

 

MATURITY AND PAYMENT. This Note shall mature within fifteen (15) Business Days after receipt of written notice to the Company by Lender of its demand of repayment of the Indebtedness (the “Due Date”), and the entire balance of the Indebtedness shall be due and payable in full on the Due Date. All payments hereunder shall be in immediately available RMB funds. For the purposes of this Note, “Business Day” shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday under the laws of the People’s Republic of China.

 

MISCELLANEOUS. Nothing in this Note shall waive or restrict any right of Lender granted in any other document or by law.  No delay on the part of Lender in the exercise of any right or remedy shall operate as a waiver. The terms and conditions of this Note may not be amended, waived or modified except in a writing signed by Lender expressly stating that the writing constitutes an amendment, waiver, or modification of the terms of this Note. This Note shall bind the respective successors and assigns of the Company. This Note is governed by the laws of the People’s Republic of China and is made effective as of the Effective Date.

 

SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE

 

1











 

The Company has duly executed this Note as of February 29, 2012.

 

 

	
 
    	
Lianhui   Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
a   company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
[Company   seal affixed]
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   
    	
Charles   Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   
    	
Legal   Representative
    


 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1725

   To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to clarify provisions 
  intended to protect the Corporation from having bank loans or other 
               assets diluted by secret side agreements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

   Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Mack, Mr. Bennett, and Mr. Faircloth) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to clarify provisions 
  intended to protect the Corporation from having bank loans or other 
               assets diluted by secret side agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION.

    Section 11(d)(9)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1821(d)(9)(A)) is amended by striking ``any agreement which does not 
meet the requirements set forth in section 13(e)'' and inserting ``any 
agreement which tends to diminish or defeat the interest of the 
Corporation in any asset acquired by the Corporation as security for a 
loan, by purchase, or as receiver of an insured depository institution, 
and which does not meet the requirements of section 13(e).''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the amendment made by 
section 1 shall apply to any claim pending, under judicial review, or 
on appeal on or after October 1, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-8234.

#### Gayle *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### City of Rochester, Respondent, v Stephen I. Teremy, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 418]

*1350Appeal from an order of Monroe County Court (Keenan, J.), entered September 16, 2002, which affirmed a judgment (denominated order) of Rochester City Court (King, J.), entered January 28, 2002 that found defendant violated Rochester City Code § 90-21 (B) (6).

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant, the owner of vacant residential property in the City of Rochester, appeals from an order of County Court affirming a judgment of City Court that found him in violation of Rochester City Code § 90-21 (B) (6) for failing to cut grass and weeds in the rear yard of his property, and imposed a penalty of $150. A Rochester Neighborhood Conservation Officer responding to the complaint of a neighbor discovered the violation when the officer inspected the rear yard from the driveway. We reject the contention of defendant that the officer’s warrantless entry onto the property violated the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches *(see*US Const Fourth Amend; NY Const, art I, § 12). Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to observations of the rear yard from the driveway *(see People v Versaggi,*296 AD2d 429 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 714 [2002]; *People v Warmuth,*187 AD2d 473, 474-475 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 894 [1993]; *People v Lewis,*162 AD2d 760, 762-763 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 894 [1990]; *People v Smith,*109 AD2d 1096, 1098-1099 [1985]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
No. 12-495.

#### Oman et al. *v.*Portland Public Schools et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             23,399
<SECURITIES>                                      255,036
<RECEIVABLES>                                     650,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                        9,581
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                             39,172
<DEPRECIATION>                                     13,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,265,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                           354,441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        19,480
<COMMON>                                              293
<OTHER-SE>                                         51,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,265,056
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  121,076
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      93,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    7,547
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 16,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                       12,697
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                16,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       16,086
<EPS-BASIC>                                     103,436.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     103,436.00


</TABLE>
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of Compressed U.S. Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of Compressed U.S. Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 12.37  | 4.18   | 1.97   | 2.95   | 3.89   | 3.43  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.26   | 5.78   | 11.50  | 6.67   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

12/21/2010 07:53:26

Query Parameters:
12/21/2010 07:53:26

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2009 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 49 

ACA AIR CANADA 19

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6 

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 901

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 31

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 2

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 6

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 21

MEP MIDWEST AIRLINES (MIDWEST EXPRESS 8

NWA NORTHWEST AIRLINES 31

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 1

POE PORTER AIRLINES 14

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

TRS AIRTRAN AIRWAYS (new 3ltr eff 03/22/03) 13

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 33

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3

USA US AIRWAYS 31

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
No. 12-8090.

#### Sanchez-Oxio *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# L_2010009EN.01000501.xml

| 14.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 9/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 9/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 26/2010

of 12 January 2010

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 of 29 April 2004 concerning further restrictive measures in relation to Liberia, (1) and in particular Article 11(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 lists the natural and legal persons, bodies and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 16 December 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 16 December 2009, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to amend the list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. Annex I should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 January 2010.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

João Vale DE ALMEIDA

Director General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 162, 30.4.2004, p. 32.

1

---

ANNEX

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 872/2004, is amended as follows:

The following natural person shall be removed:

‘Ali Kleilat (alias (a) Ali Qoleilat, (b) Ali Koleilat Delbi, (c) Ali Ramadhan Kleilat Al-Delbi, (d) Ali Ramadan Kleilat Al-Dilby, (e) Ali Ramadan Kleilat, (f) Ali Ramadan Kleilat Sari). Date of birth: 10.7.1970 (year of birth given on some of his passports is 1963). Place of birth: Beirut, Lebanon. Nationality: Lebanese. Passports No: (a) 0508734, (b) 1432126 (Lebanon), (c) Regular-RL0160888 (Lebanon), (d) D00290903 (Liberia), (e) Z01037744 (Netherlands), (f) Regular-B0744958 (Venezuela). National Registry No: 2016, Mazraa. Date of designation referred to in Article 6(b): 23.6.2004.’

---
No. 12-7287.

#### Roberts *v.*Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5836 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5836

**Commission Decision of 23/07/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5836 - BILFINGER BERGER / HERTEL GROUP / FRIDAY EUROTECH) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.)(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 23.07.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/11560/11561

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010)5267

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5836 – BILFINGER BERGER/ HERTEL GROUP/ FRIDAY EUROTECH Notification of 18/06/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C171, 30/06/2010, p. 16.

1. On 18/06/2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings BIS Industrial Services Nederland B.V. (‘BIS’), belonging to Bilfinger Berger AG (‘Bilfinger Berger’, Germany), and Hertel Beheer BV (‘Hertel’), belonging to Hertel Holding B.V. (‘Hertel Holding’, The Netherlands), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of FridayEuroTech Holding B.V. (‘FET’, The Netherlands), by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

– for Bilfinger Berger: civil engineering, construction, industrial projects, industrial services,

– for Hertel: civil engineering, construction, defence services, industrial services,

– for FET: temporary employment services.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) and 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
#### Com. v. Brown10

02/10/2016

546 EAL (2015)

10

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 96
No. 12-768.

#### Pennington et al. *v.*HSBC Bank USA, N. A., et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT G. HOULE,

Appellant,

v.

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00234

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso Co unty, Texas

(TC # 2015

- CCV01442 )

J U D G M E N T

We withdraw our Judgment of September 28, 2018, and substitute this Judgment its place.

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5 , on the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 9 TH DAY OF DECEMBER , 2018.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Ju stice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
No. 12-6529.

#### Dire et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In the Matter of Christian M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 330]

—Order of disposition, Family Cotirt, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about November 1, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the third degree and petit larceny, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly considered by the court and we perceive no basis to disturb its determinations *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.