alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010178EN.01001301.xml

| 13.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 178/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 613/2010

of 12 July 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Miód kurpiowski (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Miód kurpiowski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Miód kurpiowski’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 260, 30.10.2009, p. 38.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

POLAND

Miód kurpiowski (PGI)

---
2016-1110.

#### Goldshtein v. Mohr.

In Habeas Corpus. On motion to strike. Motion denied.
No. 12-8698.

#### Seebeck *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
2017-0069.

#### State v. King.

Muskingum App. No. CT2015-0058, 2016-Ohio-2788.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Ogilby, CA Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Ogilby, CA Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.15   | 2.83  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.76   | 3.65   | --     | 3.59   | --     | --     | 3.39   | 3.61   | 3.65   | 3.37  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.06   | 12.68  | 7.22   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Pines, LLC. 1- Due to steep topography, the parties began negotiations to

relocate the easements. Following a mutual exchange of assurances that an agreement would be reached, Pines submitted a tentative map for the City of Reno's approval. Negotiations subsequently deteriorated and
Kohlmoos refused to relocate the easements.

Pines brought an action in district court, arguing that Kohlmoos had breached an agreement to relocate the easements and seeking specific performance. The district court found that although the parties had not agreed to exact locations for the new easements, they had entered into an agreement to negotiate in good faith. Concluding that Kohlmoos breached this agreement and that the proposed easements were the only feasible location, the district court awarded specific performance pursuant to Pines' tentative map.

Nevada abides by traditional jurisprudence that agreements to agree are generally too indefinite to enforce as final agreements. May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 672, 119 P.3d 1254, 1257 (2005); City of Reno v. Silver State Flying Seru., 84 Nev. 170, 176, 438 P.2d 257, 261 (1968) (noting that lain agreement to agree at a future time is nothing and will not support an action for damages" (quoting Salomon v. Cooper, 220 P.2d 774, 775 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950))). After reviewing the record and the briefs presented on appeal, we decline to recognize at this time the enforceability of a preliminary agreement that requires the parties to negotiate in good

1 Pines is an entity created by the owners of land parcels surrounding Kenterprises' property. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them further except as necessary to our disposition.

2

### J Hardesty

a-.--- Parraguirre J.

J faith. Nor does the record include sufficient evidence of intent or definite terms to support a conclusion that the parties agreed to negotiate in good faith. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED.

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Madelyn Shipman, Settlement Judge Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Reno Maupin, Cox & LeGoy Washoe District Court Clerk

3
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Monthly Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Monthly                                                                          
|View History: Monthly                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2024                                                                                                                              | 6.54 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# The Sacramento Bee P.O. Box 15779 • 2100 O Street • Sacramento, CA 95852 

### SAC METRO AIR QUALITY 77712 TH ST 3 PD FLOOR SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION (C.C.P.2015.5) COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interest ed in the above entitled matter. I am the printer and principal clerk of the publisher of The Sacramento Bee, printed and published in the City of Sacramento, County of Sacramento, State of California, daily, for which said newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento, State of California, under the date of September 26, 1994, Action No. 379071; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each issue thereof and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 

### September 22, 2008 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed at Sacramento, California, on 

### September 22, 200

(Signature)
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                             
|No chart available.                                                             
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Utah Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-162.

#### Miller v. Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                          AMERICAN MIDLAND CORPORATION
                             FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                           ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X


     This  schedulecontains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
condensed  consolidated  finacial statements for the three months ended June 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         6,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,000
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,770,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          464,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,402,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,770,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download
**EXHIBIT8.1**

 

**LISTOF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

The Companypresently wholly owns Far East, a Hong Kong corporation, which, in turn, ownsthe following corporations:

 

**Wholly-Owned**

 

·                     Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Limited – a People’sRepublic of China corporation

·                     Euro Tech (China) Limited – a Hong Kong corporation

·                     ChinaH2O.com Limited – a Hong Kong corporation

·                     Shanghai Euro Tech Limited – a People’s Republic ofChina corporation

·                     Shanghai Euro Tech Environmental Engineering Company,Ltd. – a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                     Chongqing Euro Tech Rizhi Technology Company,Limited –a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                     Rizhi Euro Tech Instrument (Shaanxi) Company Limited–a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                     Guangzhou Euro Tech Environmental Equipment CompanyLimited – a People’s Republic of China corporation

 

**MajorityOwned**

 

·                     Yixing Pact Environmental Technology Company Limited –a PRC corporation

·                     Pact Asia Pacific Limited – a BVI corporation

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1761

      To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

 Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide early out authority for Forest Service employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Forest Service Separation Pay.--(a) In order to avoid or 
minimize the need for involuntary separations, effective for the period 
beginning upon the date of enactment of this Act through and including 
September 30, 1994, the Secretary of Agriculture, under such 
regulations and subject to such conditions as the Secretary of 
Agriculture may prescribe, shall have authority to offer separation pay 
to employees of the Forest Service to the same extent the Secretary of 
Defense is authorized to offer separation pay to employees of a defense 
agency in section 5597 of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) In the event that an authority is enacted to offer separation 
pay or a voluntary separation incentive similar to such section 5597 of 
title 5, United States Code, but applicable to employees in the 
executive branch generally, the authority under subsection (a) shall 
terminate.
    (c) Such payments may be made to employees who agree, during a 
continuous 90 day period designated by the agency head, beginning no 
earlier than the date of enactment of this Act and ending no later than 
September 30, 1994, to separate from service with the agency, whether 
by retirement or resignation.
    (d) An employee who has received a voluntary separation incentive 
under this section and accepts employment with the Government of the 
United States within 5 years of the date of the separation on which 
payment of the incentive is based shall be required to repay the entire 
amount of the incentive to the agency that paid the incentive.
    (e) Total outlays by the Forest Service pursuant to the cooperative 
work trust funds accounts (12-8028-0-7-302) shall not exceed 
$271,668,000 in fiscal year 1994.

                                 <all>
```
From: Echmalian, Jonathan

To: Johnson, Shelita (OST)

Cc: Finamore, Robert (OST); Carneal, George U.

Subject: Polling Results: Joint Application of China Airlines, Ltd. and PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk (Docket DOTOST-2012-0142)

Date: Monday, August 20, 2012 3:59:03 PM

Dear Ms. Johnson:

I am writing to inform the Department that we have completed a poll of the U.S. air carrier

representatives served with the above-referenced joint application filed on August 16, 2012, all of

whom have responded with no objections. Please let me know if you need additional information

in order to move forward with the processing of this application. Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,

Jonathan Echmalian

Transportation Specialist

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Direct: +1 202 637 5439

Tel: +1 202 637 5600

Fax: +1 202 637 5910

Email: jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com

www.hoganlovells.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

About Hogan Lovells

Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP.

For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com.

CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it

may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return

email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system.
No. 12-7878.

#### Craft *v.*Ahuja et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-8430.

#### Anderson *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Stock Incentive
Plan of our reports dated March 21, 1997, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of First Aviation Services Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 1997.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of First Aviation
Services Inc. listed in Item 14b. This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audit. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Francisco, California
April 25, 1997