alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ronald W. Fike, Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Webster, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 415]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Siracuse, J.), entered November 18, 2002, which dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition.

It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to respondent for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his CPLR article 78 petition wherein he sought to annul the determination of respondent denying his application for a variance. We are unable on the record before us to review the propriety of Supreme Court’s implicit conclusion that the determination is rational and supported by substantial evidence *(cf. Matter of Concerned Citizens of Perinton v Town of Perinton,*261 AD2d 880 [1999], *appeal dismissed*93 NY2d 1040 [1999], *cert denied sub nom. Nisco v Town of Perinton,*529 US 1111 [2000]). Although respondent held two meetings to discuss petitioner’s application and engaged in a lengthy discussion regarding the application *1344and the standards set forth in Town Law § 267-b (3) (b), respondent failed to articulate the reasons for its determination and failed to set forth findings of fact in its decision. We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to respondent to set forth the factual basis for its determination. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
No. 12-745.

#### K. C., Father *v.*Iowa et al.

Ct. App. Iowa. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7745.

#### Michuda *v.*Minnesota Board of Public Defense et al.

Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Poland (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | -----
|2020                                                                                                                              | W    |     |     |     |     | W   |       |     |       |     |     | W    
|2022                                                                                                                              |      | W   |     | W   | W   | W   | 10.41 | W   | 14.04 | W   | W   | 35.52
|2023                                                                                                                              | 7.19 | W   |     |     |     |     |       |     |       |     | W   | W    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1594 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1594

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
  to require a reduction in the discretionary spending limits in each 
 fiscal year by an amount equal to the total of any reductions made in 
            existing programs for the previous fiscal year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 27 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

 Mr. Shelby (for himself and Mr. Craig) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of 
   August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental 
  Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, the other 
         committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
  to require a reduction in the discretionary spending limits in each 
 fiscal year by an amount equal to the total of any reductions made in 
            existing programs for the previous fiscal year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deficit Reduction Assurance Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

    Section 251(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
Control Act of 1985 is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following:
            ``(D) For the budget submitted for budget years 1995, 1996, 
        1997, and 1998, the discretionary spending limits shall be 
        adjusted by reducing the limits by an amount equal to the total 
        of any reductions made in existing programs, projects, and 
        activities during the previous fiscal year. The amount of 
        reduction (if any) for a program, project, or activity shall be 
        determined by subtracting the amount of new budget authority 
        and outlays for the program, project, or activity for the 
        previous fiscal year from the amount of new budget authority 
        and outlays for the program, project, or activity for the 
        fiscal year preceding the previous fiscal year.''.

                                 <all>
```
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-25915) pertaining to the First Aviation Services Inc. Stock
Incentive Plan of our report dated March 24, 1999, except for Note 6, as to
which the date is April 28, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of First Aviation Services Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 1999.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

                                        Ernst & Young LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
April 30, 1999
#### In the Matter of Abdullah R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent. In the Matter of Marcus J., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent. In the Matter of Angel T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 18]

—Orders, Family Court, New York County (Edward Kaufman, J.), entered on or about April 28, 1994, which granted petitioner presentment agencies’ motion for reargument, and thereupon adhered to the prior determinations, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 29,1994, dismissing the petitions in the above captioned matters, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the petitions reinstated, without costs.

*623All three respondents were arrested and charged with acts which if committed by an adult would constitute various degrees of criminal possession and/or sale of a controlled substance and, in each case, moved to dismiss the petition as jurisdictionally defective on the ground that the laboratory reports, submitted in support of the respective petitions, did not constitute nonhearsay evidence that the substance in question was cocaine. Dismissal of the petitions on this ground was error. In *Matter of Kaliek G.*(208 AD2d 392, *lv denied*85 NY2d 801) and *Matter of Deshone*C. (207 AD2d 756, *lv denied*85 NY2d 801) we held that laboratory reports containing a certification signed by the testing chemist, that the report was "a true and full copy of the original report made by me”, satisfied the requirement of Family Court Act § 311.2 (3), that the petition and any supporting depositions contain nonhearsay allegations establishing, if true, every element of the crime charged and the respondent’s commission thereof. Each of the chemist’s reports in question here contained such a certification, and therefore was adequate to identify the substances in question, as cocaine. We have considered respondents’ other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Kupferman, Ross and Mazzarelli, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John W. Hayden
    
    
    
    /s/ John I. Von LehmanJohn W. Hayden
    
    
    
    John I. Von LehmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryNovember 7, 2005A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to The Midland
Company and will be retained by The Midland Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 28
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1763

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

Fleet to certain nonprofit organizations.convey vessels in the National Defense Reserve
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1763

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to convey vessels in the National Defense Reserve Fleet to certain

nonprofit organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Liberty Ships Memo5 rial Act of 1993.’’
2

S 1763 ES

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE VESSELS.

2 (a) AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—The Secretary of

3 Transportation may convey without consideration all

4 right, title, and interest of the United States in 2 vessels

5 described in subsection (b) to any nonprofit organization

6 which operates and maintains a Liberty Ship or Victory

7 Ship as a memorial to merchant mariners.

8 (b) VESSELS DESCRIBED.—Vessels which may be

9 conveyed under subsection (a) are vessels which—

10 (1) are in the National Defense Reserve Fleet

11 on the date of the enactment of this Act;

12 (2) are not less than 4,000 displacement tons;

13 (3) have no usefulness to the Government; and

14 (4) are scheduled to be scrapped.

15 (c) CONDITIONS OF CONVEYANCE.—As a condition of

16 conveying any vessel to an organization under subsection

17 (a), the Secretary shall require that before the date of the

18 conveyance the organization enter into an agreement

19 under which the organization shall—

20 (1) sell the vessel for scrap purposes;

21 (2) use the proceeds of that scrapping for the

22 purpose of refurbishing and making seaworthy a

23 Liberty Ship or Victory Ship which the organization

24 maintains as a memorial to merchant mariners, to

25 enable the ship to participate in 1994 in commemo-
3

S 1763 ES

1 rative activities in conjunction with the 50th anni2 versary of the Normandy invasion; and

3 (3) return to the United States any proceeds of

4 scrapping carried out pursuant to paragraph (1)

5 which are not used in accordance with paragraph

6 (2).

7 (d) DEPOSIT OF AMOUNTS RETURNED.—Amounts

8 returned to the United States pursuant to subsection

9 (c)(3) shall be deposited in the Vessel Operations Revolv10 ing Fund created by the Act of June 2, 1951 (65 Stat.

11 59; 46 App. U.S.C. 1241a).

12 (e) DELIVERY OF VESSELS.—The Secretary shall de13 liver each vessel conveyed under this section—

14 (1) at the place where the vessel is located on

15 the date of the approval of the conveyance by the

16 Secretary;

17 (2) in its condition on that date; and

18 (3) without cost to the Government.

19 (f) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY TO CONVEY.—The

20 authority of the Secretary under this section to convey ves-
4

S 1763 ES

1 sels shall expire on the date that is 2 years after the date

2 of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
Exhibit 99.02


         I, Venerando J. Indelicato, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DRYCLEAN
USA, Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Quarterly Report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

Date: May 13, 2003


 /s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
-----------------------------
Venerando J. Indelicato,
Treasurer and Chief Financial
   Officer



                                       21
No. 12-7864.

#### Adams *v.*Wesley.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Calais, ME Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Calais, ME Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              |     | 14  |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2010266EN.01005201.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/52

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 900/2010

of 8 October 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Estepa (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain's application to register the name ‘Estepa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain's application to register the name ‘Estepa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 36, 13.2.2010, p. 11.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.)

SPAIN

Estepa (PDO)

---
No. 12-5319.

#### Histon *v.*Chappell, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Prepared and filed by St Ives Financial





Exhibit
  10.5

OPTION CERTIFICATE

This Option Certificate evidences an Option (“Option”) to purchase shares (“Option Shares”) of Common Stock, par value $0.0025, of PacificHealth Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) granted to STEPHEN KUCHEN (the “Optionee”) pursuant to the Company’s 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), a copy of which has been furnished to the Optionee simultaneously with the delivery of this Option Certificate. The Option and Option Shares are subject to the terms, conditions, limitations and restrictions set forth in the Plan and the following terms and conditions:

a.        The effective date of the grant of the Option is February 10, 2006, and the number of Option Shares that may be purchased upon exercise of the Option is ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND (100,000) shares (the “Option Shares”).



b.        The
  Option Price shall be $0.60 per
  Option Share.

c.        The Option shall vest, subject to the provisions for early termination set forth herein and in the Plan, as to 33,334 shares on February 10, 2007; as to 33,333 shares on February 10, 2008; and as to 33,333 shares on February 10, 2009.

d.        The Option shall be exercisable to purchase Option Shares beginning on the date the Option vests as to such Shares, and shall terminate as to vested Option Shares on February 10, 2011, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the Plan.

e.        The Option may not be exercised as to any Option Share prior to the time that the Option becomes vested as to such Share. 

f.        The Option Price is payable at the time of exercise and shall be paid at the election of the Optionee (i) in cash; or (ii) in such other manner as may be approved by the Board of Directors or Committee of the Board then administering the Plan. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Option Certificate has been executed on behalf of the Company by a duly authorized officer effective this 23rd day of February 2006.

 



	
       
 	
       
 	
            PACIFICHEALTH  LABORATORIES, INC.
 
	
      
 
 
 	
       
 	
      By: 

    	
      
 /s/Robert Portman
 
	
       
 	
       
 	
       
 	
            

 
	
       
 	
       
 	
       
 	
      Robert Portman, President
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5818 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5818

**Commission Decision of 23/06/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5818 - ERICSSON / LG ELECTRONICS / JV) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 23.06.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/8933/8934

C(2010) 4391

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties: Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5818 - Ericsson/ LG Electronics/ JV Notification of 26.05.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 143, 02.06.2010, p.11

1. On 26.05.2010 the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ("Ericsson", Sweden) and LG Electronics Inc. ("LG Electronics", South Korea) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking LG-Nortel Co. Ltd. ("LG-Nortel", South Korea) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- For Ericsson: the manufacture and sale of telecommunications equipment and related services to mobile and fixed network operators,

For LG Electronics: the manufacture and sale of consumer electronics, household products, mobile communications, and IT products,

- For LG-Nortel: the manufacture and sale of carrier network products and solutions, and Enterprise telephony products and solutions.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.