alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Report) of Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co., Inc. (the Company) for
the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, Robert A. Ness, Controller (Chief Financial
Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                      |  |                                                           
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/ Robert A. Ness                                        
|                      |  |                                                           
|                      |  | Robert A. Ness
Title: Controller (Chief Financial Officer)
|                      |  |                                                           
|                      |  |                                                           
|                      |  | Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities Co., Inc.              
|                      |  |                                                           
|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |
No. 12-6754.

#### Cobb *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8086.

#### Wilson *v.*Arkansas.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
July 6, 2015

Mr. Cameron Patterson

CC Patterson & Associates

13400 Highway 66

Ashland, OR 97520

Dear Mr. Patterson :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

part 21 (H) ; § § 61.23 , 61.113(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 17, 2015 exemption request on behalf of CC Patterson & Associates

into the public docket (No. FAA− 2015

− 1303 ), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us al l of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you w ant us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of th e exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
ACADIA NATIONAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE

Twelve Months Ended September 30, 1998 and 1997
(in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                       Fiscal Year Ended    Fiscal Year Ended 
                                       September 30,        September 30,
Description                            1998                 1997
                                                       
                                       -----------------    ----------------
<S>                                    <C>                  <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding 
during the period                      3,744,321            3,733,987

Shares issuable upon assumed exercise 
of stock options, less amounts assumed 
repurchased under the treasury stock           0                    0
method                                 -----------------    ----------------

Total weighted average common stock
and common stock equivalents 
outstanding during the period          3,744,321            3,733,987
                                       =================    ================ 

Net income from continuing operations $   53,650           $    1,866

Discontinued operation, net of tax             0                    0

Extraordinary items, net of tax                0                    0
                                       -----------------    ----------------
Net income                            $   53,650           $    1,866
                                       =================    ================ 


Net income per common share:          $    .0143           $    .0005

</TABLE>
No. 12-641.

#### House *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### People v Bryant

1st Dept: 147 AD3d 412

denied
No. 12-7417.

#### Lewis *v.*Walters, Secretary, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Everett, MA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Everett, MA Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              | 3,119 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**EXHIBIT8.1**

The Companypresently wholly owns Euro Tech (Far East) Limited, a Hong Kong corporationwhich, in turn, owns the following corporations:

**Wholly-Owned**

·                  Euro Tech Trading (Shanghai) Limited — a People’sRepublic of China corporation

·                  Euro Tech (China) Limited — a Hong Kongcorporation

·                  ChinaH2O.com Limited — a Hong Kong corporation

·                  Shanghai Euro Tech Limited — a People’s Republicof China corporation

**MajorityOwned (51%)**

·                  Yixing Pact Environmental Technology CompanyLimited — a People’s Republic of China corporation

·                  Pact Asia Pacific Limited — a British VirginIslands corporation

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>                  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                          EXTRACTED   FROM  ANR  PIPELINE   COMPANY  FORM  10-Q
                          QUARTERLY  REPORT FOR THE PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
                          AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000,000
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                        6
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               223
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                  28
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            284
<PP&E>                                                    3,407
<DEPRECIATION>                                            2,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       198
<BONDS>                                                     498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                  708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              1,704
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            407
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             181
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 53
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         128
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                128
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominic Mainella, Jr., Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 802]—

Appeal from a judgment of Wyoming County Court (Dadd, J.), entered September 6, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that the photo array was unduly suggestive and that County Court therefore erred in denying his suppression motion. We reject that contention. The eyewitness described the suspect as wearing a black shirt, and five of the six photographs in the photo array depicted men wearing black shirts. The fact that only defendant wore a black T-shirt with a logo does not render the photo array unduly suggestive *(see generally People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, 335-336 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 833 [1990]).

Defendant further contends that the verdict is repugnant because the jury found him guilty of burglary but acquitted him of larceny. We reject that contention *(see generally People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 6-8 [1981], *rearg denied*55 NY2d 1039 [1982]). The crime of burglary requires only a knowing unlawful entry with intent to commit a crime therein *(see People v Mackey,*49 NY2d 274, 278 [1980]), and such intent may be inferred from the circumstances of the entry *(see People v Williams,*273 AD2d 815 [2000]). The evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
No. 12-7797.

#### Pulido *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: AIDS International Training and Research Program.
    Date: June 8-10, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Bethesda, Versailles Room, 8120 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 652-2000.
    Contact Person: Dr. Stanley Oaks, Scientific Review Adm., 6003 
Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C06, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-7042.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: May 13, 1998.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-13538 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1559 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1559

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to submit a plan to Congress to 
achieve full and fair payment for Bureau of Reclamation water used for 
             agricultural purposes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to submit a plan to Congress to 
achieve full and fair payment for Bureau of Reclamation water used for 
             agricultural purposes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WATER RECLAMATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall develop a plan 
for charging the recipient of water from a water reclamation project 
conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation the full and fair value of water 
received that is used for agricultural purposes.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 1, 1994, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall transmit the plan developed under subsection (a) to the 
Congress.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                                        
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                     
|Price of Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Israel (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.75   | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Elizabeth Hendler, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[768 NYS2d 626]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant City of New York appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated October 2, 2003, which granted the plaintiff’s motion, in effect, for leave to file an amended notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was for leave to file an amended notice of claim including an allegation that the defendant City of New York negligently planned and designed the traffic control device at the subject intersection and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

As the plaintiff now acknowledges by withdrawing from her *686brief on appeal the language concerning negligent planning and design, the proposed amendment to the notice of claim regarding an allegation that the City of New York negligently planned and designed the traffic control device at the subject intersection substantially altered the nature of her claim. As such, this new theory is time-barred *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e  ) and not within the purview of General Municipal Law § 50-e (6) *(see Ford v Babylon Union Free School Dist.,*213 AD2d 447 [1995]; *see also Richard v Town of Oyster Bay,*300 AD2d 561 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for leave to file an amended notice of claim to include an assertion of negligent traffic planning and design. The remainder of the proposed amended notice of claim presents no new theories absent from the original notice of claim. Ritter, J.P, Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of DCB Financial Corp (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Ustaszewski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




/s/ John A. Ustaszewski


John A. Ustaszewski
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003