alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-10]


Revision of Class E Airspace; McAlester, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at McAlester, OK.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 12623 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 
(63 FR 12623). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Forth Worth, TX, on May 5, 1998.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12745 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar  | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul  | Aug   | Sep  | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | ---- | --- | ---- | ----- | ---- | --- | ----- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     | 9.25 |     |      |     |      |       |      |     |       |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |      |     |      |     | 6.80 | 11.09 | 8.08 |     | 11.38 |    
|2024                                                                                                                              |     |     |      |     | 7.59 |     |      |       |      |     |       |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
*December 11, 2017*

2017-Ohio-8925.]

#### In re Harris.

On April 20, 2016, this court found Dwayne Harris to be a vexatious litigator under S.CtPrac.R. 4.03(B). This court further ordered that Harris was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in the court without obtaining leave. On December 4, 2017, Harris presented an application for leave to institute a legal proceeding in the Ohio Supreme Court. It is ordered by the court that the application for leave is denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adrian Jackson, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 599]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silver-man, J.), rendered April 2, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, criminal trespass in the second degree and possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 9 years, 1 year and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Charged with committing two apartment building burglaries, defendant was convicted of burglary in the second degree as to one and criminal trespass in the second degree as to the other. The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Furthermore, we find the evidence as to each of the charges to be overwhelming. In one incident, the conclusion is inescapable that defendant entered a building and stole a bicycle *(see generally People v Galbo,*218 NY 283 [1916]). In the other incident, the witness made a reliable identification which was corroborated by defendant’s spontaneous statement made upon his recognition of the witness.

*306In its supplemental instruction, the court should not have told the jury that it could consider the evidence of defendant’s alleged burglary in the second building to establish his intent to commit a crime inside the first building, since the evidence did not warrant such an instruction *(see People v Molineux,*168 NY 264 [1901]). However, the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence supporting each of the crimes of which defendant was convicted *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242 [1975]), and the fact that defendant was acquitted of burglary with respect to the first building.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). Defendant’s theft-related convictions were highly relevant to his credibility. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Colombia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Colombia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 4.86   | 4.06  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.83   | 7.38   | 12.72  | 6.82   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2010296EN.01000701.xml

| 13.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 296/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1024/2010

of 12 November 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de châtaigne corse/Farina castagnina corsa (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de châtaigne corse/Farina castagnina corsa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de châtaigne corse/Farina castagnina corsa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 78, 27.3.2010, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Farine de châtaigne corse/Farina castagnina corsa (PDO)

---
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|New Hampshire Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|New Hampshire Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8,831  | 9,159  | 10,237
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 10,521 | 11,088 | 11,383 | 11,726 | 12,240 | 12,450 | 12,755 | 13,225 | 13,512 | 13,932
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 14,219 | 15,068 | 15,130 | 15,047 | 15,429 | 16,266 | 16,139 | 16,150 | 41,332 | 16,937
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16,645 | 17,186 | 17,758 | 17,298 | 17,421 | 18,185 | 18,571 | 18,507 | 18,696 | 19,076
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 19,485 | 19,630 | 19,657 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
# L_2011025DE.01003201.xml

| 28.1.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 25/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 25/32

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 983/2010 der Kommission vom 3. November 2010 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 185/2010 zur Festlegung von detaillierten Maßnahmen für die Durchführung der gemeinsamen Grundstandards in der Luftsicherheit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 286 vom 4. November 2010
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 286 vom 4. November 2010

Auf Seite 2, im Anhang, Punkt 3:

anstatt:

„In Kapitel 5, Anlage 5-B, werden folgender Eintrag sowie der folgende zweite und dritte Unterabsatz hinzugefügt:“

muss es heißen:

„In Kapitel 5, Anlage 5-A, werden folgender Eintrag sowie der folgende zweite und dritte Unterabsatz hinzugefügt:“.

---
#### K.L. v. G.L.

10/14/2015

378 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 121 A.3d 1137
exv10w9



 





Exhibit 10.9



INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL SERVICES, INC.

RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS

MAY 12, 2006




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Grant Date	 	Name	 	Title	 	Shares
	May 12, 2006
	 	Callahan, Bob	 	Senior Vice President of Human Resources	 	 	18,000	 
	May 12, 2006
	 	Humphrey, Richard	 	Chief Operating Officer	 	 	25,200	 
	May 12, 2006
	 	Miller, David	 	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 	 	18,000	 
	May 12, 2006
	 	Upham, Gregory	 	Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer	 	 	5,400	 
	May 12, 2006
	 	Warnock, Curt	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	 	 	18,000
Motion Granted; Order filed January 8, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00505-CR

____________

MARK DWIGHT MASON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1529090

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion asking to 

review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is 

granted.
Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 208th District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local procedure; 

that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before January 23, 

2019; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of 

the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief with this court 

within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
219P16

#### Yili Tseng v. Harold Martin, Individually and as Chancellor of North Carolina A&T State University, Benjamin Uwakweh, Individually and as Dean of North Carolina A&T State University, and North Carolina A&T State University

Pit’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA1B-739)

Denied
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Thomas, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 614]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County *759Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered April 20, 2001, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that he did not knowingly and voluntarily enter a plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review since he never moved to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing or to vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662 [1988]; *People v Claudio,*64 NY2d 858 [1985]; *People v Randall,*295 AD2d 453 [2002]; *People v Dunkins,*231 AD2d 587 [1996]; *People v Aloisi,*177 AD2d 491 [1991]). In any event, this claim is without merit since the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made *(see People v Fiumefreddo,*82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; *People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9 [1983]).

Also unpreserved for appellate review is the defendant’s challenge to his enhanced sentence since he failed to object to the sentence or move to vacate his plea *(see People v Howze,*243 AD2d 652 [1997]; *People v Gayle,*224 AD2d 710 [1996]; *People v Ellis,*162 AD2d 701 [1990]).

In any event, the record clearly demonstrates that after the defendant entered his plea, the court expressly warned the defendant that he would face the imposition of an enhanced sentence if he got into any trouble before sentencing or failed to appear on the scheduled sentencing date. Once the defendant failed to appear for the scheduled sentencing date, the court was authorized to unilaterally impose the enhanced sentence *(see People v Velez,*212 AD2d 647 [1995]; *People v Gayle, supra; People v Aloisi, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-295 and 50-304]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Zion Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 
and 2; Notice of Public Meeting

    The NRC will conduct a public meeting at the Zion-Benton High 
School, 3901 21st Street, Zion, Illinois, on June 1, 1998, to discuss 
the NRC regulatory process for decommissioning and plans developed by 
Commonwealth Edison Company (CECo, the licensee) to decommission the 
Zion Nuclear Power Plant located near Zion, Illinois. Zion-Benton High 
School is located on the southeast corner of Kenosha Road and 21st 
Street, Zion, Illinois. Parking is provided in the South Parking Lot at 
the school. The meeting is scheduled for 7-9:00 p.m. and will be 
chaired by Dr. Donald Moon, Co-Chairman, Community Advisory Panel and 
President, Shimer College. The meeting will include a presentation by 
CECo on their planned decommissioning activities. The NRC staff will 
make a short presentation on the decommissioning process and NRC 
programs for monitoring decommissioning activities. There will be an 
opportunity for members of the public to make comments and ask 
questions of the NRC staff and CECo representatives after the 
presentations. The meeting will be transcribed.
    Regulatory submittals and responses are available for public 
inspection at the local public document room, located at the Waukegan 
Public Library, 128 North County Street, Waukegan, IL 60085 and the 
Commission Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 
20037.
    For more information, contact Mr. Anthony W. Markley, Project 
Manager, Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate, 
Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 20555-
0001, telephone number (301) 415-3165.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of May 1998.

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Ramin R. Assa,
Project Manager, Project Directorate III-2, Division of Reactor Program 
Projects III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-13224 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### 1400 Market Street, LLC v. Fox Funding, LLC; Two River Community Bank v. Fox Funding PA LLC; Melo Enterprises, LLC v. Fox Funding LLC; Melo Enterprises, LLC, In re

03/16/2016

747 MAL (2015)

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 90
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 582 KIM NORQUAY, JR. ,

Petitioner and Appellant , v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including December 23 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2022

10/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0582