alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6559

MELVIN FRAZIER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; MICHAEL JACKSON, JR., TV Personality, 

Oldest son of pop singer Michael Jackson,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:20-cv-00201-TSE-IDD)

Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Melvin Frazier appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his 

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. On 

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 

34(b). Because Frazier’s informal brief fails to challenge the basis for the district court’s 

disposition, Frazier has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. 

Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; 

under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We deny Frazier’s motion to amend 

the complaint and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Order entered October 20, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00992-CV

FRISCO SQUARE DEVELOPERS, LLC, Appellant

V.

KPITCH ENTERPRISES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 417-01983-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s October 17, 2016 motion for extension of time to file 

appellee’s brief and appellant’s October 18, 2016 response to appellee’s motion. The Court 

GRANTS appellee’s request. We ORDER appellee to file the brief within TWENTY DAYS

from the date of this order.

The Court is directed to set this case at issue.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Al’s Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Health, Bureau of Health Promotion and Risk Reduction 58

03/09/2016

318 WAL (2015)

58

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-10


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, David E. Meador, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:   May 14, 2003                             /s/ DAVID E. MEADOR
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                     David E. Meador
                                                 Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer of
                                             Michigan Consolidated Gas Company

                                       20
412 P.2d 305

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Henry YOUNG, Appellant.

1 CA-CR 51.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

March 23, 1966.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1966.

Review Denied May 17, 1966.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., by James S. Tegart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

John M. Levy, Phoenix, for appellant.

STEVENS, Chief Judge.

The defendant was charged with two counts relating to marijuana, one count being for possession and the other count arising out of the same transaction, being for sale. The information contained a statement of prior conviction in relation to a different type of offense and this statement was not urged by the County Attorney. The matter was tried to a jury and the defendant was found guilty of possession with a verdict of not guilty in relation to the count charging a sale. He was adjudged guilty in accordance with the verdict of the jury and sentence was pronounced. He is released on bond pending appeal.

The defendant and his wife testified, the other witnesses being the law enforcement officers and the chemist. There were no motions for directed verdict. At the time of the alleged transaction, the testimony indicates that there were present the defendant, a police officer and a Mr. Gibson. The defendant attempts to urge that the failure to call Gibson as a witness was a material defect in connection with the proof. Gibson was not endorsed on the information, no subpoena appears in the file for him, he was known by the defendant and his residence address as of the date of the claimed offense was known by the defendant. We find no error in the failure of the State to call Mr. Gibson as a witness.

The evidence discloses that the officer was not an accomplice. It is urged that the defendant was entrapped. The defense of entrapment was properly covered by the jury instructions and the jury found an absence of a basis for this defense. It is urged that the two' verdicts are inconsistent. There was testimony that the money which was to change hands in connection with the purchase did not leave the hands of the officer and pass to the hands of the defendant and under the instructions, *131the jury was certainly justified in finding the defendant not guilty of Count II.

There are no principles of law involved in this appeal which are not adequately covered by the statutes or case law of this State. From a careful examination of the entire record, we find no error.

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

CAMERON and DONOFRIO, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 179 (Monday, September 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22479]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8474]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Francesco Vanni: Art in Late Renaissance Siena''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Francesco Vanni: Art in Late Renaissance 
Siena,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with foreign owners or custodians. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, CT, from on or about September 
29, 2013, until on or about January 5, 2014, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 10, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-22479 Filed 9-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0733

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

CLEVE ERNEST SPANG,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 3, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2024

07/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0733
#### Kira G., Matter of (Talia G.)

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 657 (Proceeding No. 2)

denied*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements for Metaline Mining & Leasing Company at September 
30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial 
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         505,327
<SECURITIES>                                    13,719
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               510,327
<PP&E>                                           4,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 528,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,072
<OTHER-SE>                                     382,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,089
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,108
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,774
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,774
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


        






</TABLE>
Mr. Bradley M. Miller 

Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency 

2SO William Howard Taft Drive 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45219 

RE: Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., W.C. Beckjord Station 

Facility ID No.: 1413100008 

Emissions Units: BOO 1, 8002, B003, 8004, BOOS, and B006 

Dear Mr. Miller: 

This letter is to inform you that, as of October 1, 2014, the six coal-fired emissions units at W.C. 

Beckjord Station (B001, 8002, 8003, 8004, BOOS, and 8006) are permanently shut down and 

removed from service. It is the understanding of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. that authorization to 

operate the affected units has ceased as of October 1, 2014 and the permittee shall not be 

required to meet any Title V permit requirements applicable to these emissions units, except for 

any residual requirements, such as the quarterly deviation reports and annual compliance 

certification covering the period during which the emissions units last operated. 

Please call Andrew Roebel at Sl3-287-23S6 if you should have any questions regarding this 

information. 

Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that all factual 

statements in this transmittal are true, accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. 

Very truly yours, 

Michael Sharp 

GM III - NonReg Fossil Station
#### AnnMarie A. Pollas, Appellant, v Aminah R. Jackson, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 796]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J), entered December 20, 2002, which *701granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

Assuming, without deciding, that the evidence proffered by the defendant established a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), the evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition demonstrated that as a consequence of the accident, she suffered two torn menisci of the right knee. This prevented her from engaging in activities in which she had previously participated. This evidence raised a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a “significant limitation of use of a body function or system” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *see D’Amato v Stomboli,*264 AD2d 800 [1999]). Accordingly, the motion should have been denied. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b)

and section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,

18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I,  William R. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Metaline Mining and Leasing Company, certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Metaline Mining and Leasing Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metaline Mining and Leasing Company



Date: May 26, 2004

/s/ William R. Green

________________________________

William R. Green, Chief Executive Officer













































11
No. 12-7302.

#### Lambert *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1764

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 21, 1993

Referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation

AN ACT

To provide for the extension of certain authority for the

Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court

Police.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 9(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act relating to

4 the policing of the building and grounds of the Supreme

5 Court of the United States,’’ approved August 18, 1949

6 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)), is amended in the first sentence by

7 striking out ‘‘1993’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘1996’’.

Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 2), 1993.

Attest: WALTER J. STEWART,

Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,122,233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  517,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,725,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,418,996
<PP&E>                                         585,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,363,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,488,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,200
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,734,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,363,149
<SALES>                                      7,316,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,089,046
<CGS>                                        5,607,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,621,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                616,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                   230,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   386,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Calexico, CA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Calexico, CA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct   | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 17.13 | 18.71 |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Air Quality Program 

Sacaton, AZ. 85247 

To: District 5 

We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming 

Community meeting on 6 -14 -=. 

The air quality program will make a presentation on the following 

The presentation will be given by r)av\ . 

Please call Janet Travis at (520) 562-2234 ext. 286 to confirm 

placement on the agenda. 

Than k-you 

I I 
1 TRAWMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 1 I I 

TIME : 06/01/2005 16: 28 

NAME : DEPT DEB 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 

FAX NO. /NAME 

DURATION 

PAGE(S) 

RESULT 

MODE 

06/01 16:28 

5623435 

00:00: 19 

01 

OK 

STWDARD 

ECM 

Air Quality Progmtn 

Sacaton, AZ. 85247 

Date: b 4 -05 

To: bistrict3/ 

We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming 

Community meeting on 6 -14 -Ot;. 

The air quality program will make a presentation on the following 

The presentation will be given by bdu\ 'b(~cc~- ,
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP98-105-007 and RP98-165-002]


Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 30, 1998, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, 
Inc. (Williams), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, with the 
proposed effective date of May 1, 1998:

First Revised Sheet No. 6
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 6A
First Revised Sheet Nos. 268, 269, and 270

    Williams states that the filing is being made in compliance with 
Ordering Paragraph (B) of the Order on Rehearing and Compliance 
Filing, issued March 31, 1998, in Docket No. RP98-105-001, et al. 
The Commission directed Williams to submit surcharge to recover its 
GSR Costs.
    Williams states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
participants listed on the service lists maintained by the Commission 
in the dockets referenced above and on all of Williams' jurisdictional 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12478 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In the Matter of Rosa M., Appellant, v Francisco P., Respondent.

[53 NYS3d 525]

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Gail A. Adams, Ref.), entered on or about February 8, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, modified a visitation order to provide for overnight visitation with the parties’ child every Wednesday until April 14, 2016, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The temporary visitation order is not an order of disposition and thus not appealable as of right *(see*Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; *Matter of Holtzman v Holtzman,*47 AD2d 620 [1st Dept 1975]), and we decline to review it *(see id.).*Moreover, the appeal is moot, as the temporary order has already expired *(see Matter of Sasha B. [Erica B.],*73 AD3d 587, 587 [1st Dept 2010], *appeal dismissed*16 NY3d 755 [2011]).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.
No. 12-5798.

#### Hardine *v.*Office and Professional Employees International Union.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.