alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 16

- BG

- 464

I N RE S TEPHANIE G. R EICH , R ESPONDENT
. A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 473039 ) On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsib ility Ad Hoc Hearing Committee Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline (B DN 241

- 15 ) (Decided: September 10 , 2020)
Before T HOMPSON and D EAHL , Associate Judges , and N EBEKER , Senior Judge

P ER C URIAM : This decision is non

- precedential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d) regarding the appropriate citation of this opinion.

In this disciplinary matter, the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (the Committee) recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(c). The petition is based on the finding that Respondent’s conviction for making a false statement to obtain unemployment compensation did not constitute moral turpitude per se . The Committee found that “circumstances in2
which Respondent found herself [a “volunteer” for the Gray campaign who was paid a stipend] may not have been employment at all” within the meaning of the unemployment compensation statute. 1

Respondent acknowledged that s he committed a misdemeanor crime in violation of D.C. Rules of Prof essional Conduct 8.4(b) and 8.4 (c). The proposed discipline is a three

- year suspension without a fitness requirement nunc pro tunc to July 5, 2016 , the date she filed her D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

Having reviewed the Committee’s recomm endation in accordance with our procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d), we agree this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline and the proposed disposition is not unduly lenient or inconsistent with dispositions im posed for comparable professional misconduct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that R espondent Stephanie G. Reich is hereby suspended from the practice of law for three years , nunc pro tunc to July 5, 2016, the date on which Respondent filed a compliant D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) a ffidavit with this court

.

1 Report and Recommendation of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee at 15.3

So ordered.
CAAP-12-0000684

#### State v. Fisher

Affirmed
No. 12-796.

#### Taylor *v.*Harbour Pointe Homeowners Assn. et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8141.

#### Barron *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Com. v. Fernandez 19

03/22/2016

868 MAL (2015)

19

. Justice WECHT did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 131 A.3d 100
# C_2019292EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9485 — NAEV/Siemens/KoMiPo/Stavro Vind)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 292/01)

On 22 August 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9485. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9485. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
No. 12-8442.

#### Dorman *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,985  | 782    | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 40.24  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Felicia Cantave et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 896]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), entered August 21, 2002, which, upon a jury verdict determining that the defendant, the City of New York, was not liable for the infant plaintiffs injuries, and upon an order of the same court dated June 28, 2002, denying the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4404, inter alia, to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence, is in favor of the defendant and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, it was not “logically impossible” *(Rubin v Pecoraro,*141 AD2d 525, 527 [1988]) to find that the defendant was negligent without also finding that such negligence was a proximate cause of the accident *(see ElShafaie v Verma,*2 AD3d 394 [2003]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion pursuant to CPLR 4404, inter alia, to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence *(see People v McNeal, 300*AD2d 322 [2002]; *Martonick v Pudiak,*285 AD2d 935, 935-936 [2001]; *Schaefer v Guddemi,*182 AD2d 808 [1992]; *Brennan v Bauman & Sons Buses,*107 AD2d 654 [1985]; *see also Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
RASHEEM JOHN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4166

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed January 6, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Wesley R. Douglas , Judge

.

Rasheem John, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorn ey

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Netherlands (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.35   | 6.61   | 4.78  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.51   | 7.24   | 12.50  | 7.61   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12A433.

#### Mitrano v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A., et al.

D. C. E. D. Va. Application for stay, addressed to Justice Alito and referred to the Court, denied.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Housenger: 

Thank you for notifying the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) of the draft 

final rule entitled, HPesticides; Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemption." HHS waives review of 

the final rule. 

HHS appreciates the opportunity to review the final rule, and if you have additional questions 

concerning this matter please contact Jamar Hawkins of my staff. He can be reached at 

Jamar.Hawkins@hhs.gov or 202.205.6380. 

Sincerely, 

V}lflt(tt#uullt i {uk ({2!Zt{c_ 

Madhura C. Valverde 

Executive Secretary to the Department
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         80
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    13
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106
<PP&E>                                         1,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          264
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       149
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   468
<SALES>                                        163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               185
<CGS>                                          6
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             34
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                41
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            41
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   41
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .01



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Billy Grace, Petitioner, v Phyllis O. Flug et al., Respondents.

[630 NYS2d 947]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, *inter alia,*to preclude the respondents from prosecuting him under Queens County Indictment No. 12534/94.

Motion by the respondent Phyllis Orlikoff Flug to dismiss the proceeding.

*738Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto and in support of the motion, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71*NY2d 564, 569; *see, Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner in this case has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
#### COM. v. RISOLDI, C.

2677 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/15/2017

Reargument Denied 10/19/2017

CP-09-0002487-2015

(Bucks)

Affirmed
No. 12-816.

#### Stoner *v.*Young Concert Artists, Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-8027.

#### Edmiston *v.*Wells Fargo Bank.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-513.

#### Jallali *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1574 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1574

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in the 
              State of New Jersey; and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 20 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

  Mr. Bradley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in the 
              State of New Jersey; and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 6 of 
Public Law 100-515 (16 U.S.C. 1244 note) is amended by striking 
``$250,000'' and inserting in lieu thereof, ``$2,500,000''.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Croatia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar   | Apr   | May | Jun | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | -----
|2021                                                                                                                              |       |     | 7,367 | 3,666 |     |     |       |     |       |     | 3,121 | 3,117
|2022                                                                                                                              | 2,941 |     | 3,358 |       |     |     |       |     |       |     |       |      
|2023                                                                                                                              |       |     |       | 3,163 |     |     | 3,526 |     | 3,508 |     |       | 3,050
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6605.

#### Leal-Vega *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnathan Villafuerte, Appellant.

[49 NYS3d 623]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered on July 3, 2013, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Gische and Kapnick, JJ.