alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 486    | 5,942  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-8330.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 12.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eytan Bar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mer Telemanagement
Solutions Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
Subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) [Paragraph omitted
pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986] (c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2005

/s/Eytan Bar
-------------------------
Eytan Bar
Chief Executive Officer

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### Bert Alexander, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[769 NYS2d 267]

Order, Súpreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered November 26, 2002, denying petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Eetitioner failed to demonstrate reasonable excuse for the delay in filing a timely notice of claim, failed to establish that respondents had notice of the facts constituting his claim within 90 days or a reasonable time thereafter, and failed to show that respondents will not be substantially prejudiced in their ability to investigate this matter and defend the claim on the merits *(Matter of Dubowy v City of New York,*305 AD2d 320 [2003]). His excuse for the delay—that he was awaiting an accident report—was unreasonable, inasmuch as he had all the information necessary to file a timely notice. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the facts upon which liability is predicated were not discernible from the workers’ compensation report allegedly filed with the City by petitioner’s employer *(see Matter of Mc-Loughlin v*City *of New York,*178 AD2d 193, 194 [1991]). Moreover, substantial passage of time since February 2001 has prejudiced respondents’ ability to investigate the alleged defects in the ladder or to collect testimony from witnesses whose memories are fresh. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jamar Logan, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 863]

— Appeal from a judgment of Monroe County Court (Maloy, J.), entered September 10, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [8]). Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a determinate term of imprisonment of five years and a five-year period of postrelease supervision. The valid waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see *People v Allen,*82 NY2d 761, 763 [1993]; *People v Figueroa,*283 AD2d 943 [2001], *lv denied*96 NY2d 862 [2001]). The further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel’s failure to challenge a prior felony conviction in Virginia involves matters outside the record on appeal and thus must be raised by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 *(see People v Reynolds,*309 AD2d 976 [2003]). The record does not specify the Virginia statute under which defendant was convicted, and thus we cannot determine whether there is a comparable statute in New York *(see generally People v Gonzalez,*61 NY2d 586, 588-589 [1984]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.
# L_2010269EN.01002101.xml

| 13.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/21

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 917/2010

of 12 October 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fourme de Montbrison (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fourme de Montbrison’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fourme de Montbrison’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 October 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 27, 3.2.2010, p. 19.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

FRANCE

Fourme de Montbrison (PDO)

---
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No
. 04 -0 9- 00 40 7- CR JohnCha rl e s GA RZ A , Appellant
v . STA TE of

Te xas , Appellee F ro m th e 14 4th

Judic ia l D ist

ri c t Co ur t, B e xar County , T e xas Trial Court No. 2007-CR-1811 Honora ble Catherine T orre s-Stahl , J udg e Presiding PER CU RI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion , J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Aug ust 12, 2009 DI SMI SSED Pur su ant t o a

ple a -b arg a in a g re e me nt, a pp e lla nt Joh n Ch arl e s G arza

ple d n olo c on te nd e re to sexual assault of a child and w as sentenc ed to six y ear s and a fine of $1200 in a ccor dance with the te rm s o f h is p le a -b arg a in a g ree me nt. Th e tr ia l c ourt sig ne d a c e rt if ic a tio n o f d e fe nd ant’ s r ig ht t o appea l stating that this “is a plea-bar g ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a) (2).04
- 09
- 00 40 7- CR

- 2- Rule 25.2(d) provide s that “[t] he appe al must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defe ndant has the r ight of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25 .2 (d ). Thus , th is c ourt iss ue d an or de r statin g Ga rza ’s a pp e a l wo uld

be dis mis se d unle ss an ame nded trial c ourt ce rtification showing that Gar za had the rig ht of appe al was ma de par t of the appellate rec ord. See Da nie ls v. Sta te , 110 S.W .3d 174, 177 (Tex. A pp.—San Antonio 2003, or der) ; T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amende d trial court c ertification has been f iled. I nstead, Ga

rza’s appellate counsel ha s filed a letter stating she has re viewed the appellate rec ord and “ this court has
no c ho ic e bu t to dis mis s th e a pp e a l.” I n li g ht o f t

he re c or d p re se nte d, we a g re e wi th G arza ’s a pp e llate
cou ns el tha t Ru le 25 .2 (d ) r e qu ir e s th is c ourt to d ism iss the a

pp e a l. A c c or din g ly , th e a pp e a l is dismiss ed. PER CU RI AM
DO NO T PU B L I SH
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1562 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1562

 To terminate the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uniformed Services University of the 
Health Sciences Termination and Deficit Reduction Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH 
              SCIENCES.

    (a) Termination.--(1) The Uniformed Services University of the 
Health Sciences is terminated.
    (2)(A) Chapter 104 of title 10, United States Code, is repealed.
    (B) The table of chapters at the beginning of subtitle A of such 
title, and at the beginning of part III of such subtitle, are each 
amended by striking out the item relating to chapter 104.
    (b) Effective Date.--The termination referred to in subsection (a), 
and the amendments made by such subsection, shall take effect on the 
date of the graduation from the Uniformed Services University of the 
Health Sciences of the last class of students that enrolled in such 
university on or before the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### People ex rel. Wingate v Capra

App Div, 2d Dept: 2015 NY Slip Op 92435(U)

denied
#### Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mirkov 57

03/09/2016

569 MAL (2015)

57

. Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 122 A.3d 1141
No. 12-8205.

#### Teters *v.*Borst Automotive Inc. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
October 3, 2016

Mr. Jesse Moore Skylift Global
722 Via Cafetal San Marcos, CA 92069

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 7197

Dear Mr. Moore :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the August 3, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petit ion, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possi ble. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/ Dan Ngo Program Analyst
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                            
|No chart available.                                                            
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Illinois Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7935.

#### Mora *v.*Jacquez, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13306]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1216-DR]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, (FEMA-1216-DR), dated April 29, 1998, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 11, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 29, 1998:

Leslie County for Individual Assistance (already designated for 
Public Assistance)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-13306 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
# L_2010286EN.01000301.xml

| 4.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 286/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 286/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 984/2010

of 3 November 2010

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Ovčí hrudkový syr – salašnícky (TSG)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, Slovakia's application to register the name ‘Ovčí hrudkový syr – salašnícky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, Slovakia's application to register the name ‘Ovčí hrudkový syr – salašnícky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register.

| (3) | Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 20, 27.1.2010, p. 33.

2

---

ANNEX

Products listed in Annex I to the Treaty, intended for human consumption:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SLOVAKIA

Ovčí hrudkový syr – salašnícky (TSG)

---
No. 11-10826.

#### Alshaif *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.