alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit_10-2.htm










Exhibit 10.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Second Amendment") is entered into as of this 21 day of March 2012, by and between Ormat Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Employer"), and Yehudit Bronicki (the "Employee").







WHEREAS, the parties hereto previously entered into an employment agreement dated as of July 1, 2004, which agreement was amended in March 2008, (the "Employment Agreement"); and







WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee are interested in further modifying the Agreement to extend its term for an additional two (2) years, all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment;







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:







1.           Renewal.  The parties hereby agree to extend the Agreement for a renewal term of two (2) years until June 30, 2014.


 


2.           Continued Validity.   Except as specifically modified by this Second Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to govern the business relationship between the parties.  In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of this Second Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, as amended, the terms of this Second Amendment shall control.







3.           Entire Agreement.  This Second Amendment and the Agreement, as amended, constitute the entire agreement and understanding between the parties respective the employment of the Employee with the Employer.  Any modifications to this Second Amendment or the Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties







4.           Governing Law.   This Second Amendment, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto, and any claims or disputes relating thereto, will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware (but not including the choice of law rules thereof).







5.           Counterparts.   This Second Amendment may be executed n several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts when taken together shall constitute one and the same original.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Second Amendment.


 



	Ormat Technologies, Inc.	Yehudit Bronicki
	  	 
	/s/ Lucien Y. Bronicki	/s/Yehudit Bronicki
	Name:  Lucien Y. Bronicki	 
	Title:    Chairman and CTO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company, a Washington Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Metaline Mining & Leasing Company

Date:  August 18, 2003

/s/ Gregory B. Lipsker

________________________________

Gregory B. Lipsker,

President
No. 12-8088.

#### Rangel *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, June 19, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-13866 Filed 5-20-98; 12:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C. Section 1350








I, Bryn
Harman, Chief Financial Officer of HuntMountain Resources, certify
that:








1.           This
report on Form 10-Q/A of HuntMountain Resources fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.           The
information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain
Resources.





Date:
October 7, 2008





/s/
      Bryn HarmanBryn
      Harman, Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-7399.

#### Roemmele *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Siobhan Forte et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, and Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., Doing Business as Dollar Rent A Car, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[767 NYS2d 888]

In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., doing business as Dollar Rent A Car, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Carson, J.), dated October 24, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

*490Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs were injured when the New York City Transit Authority bus in which they were passengers collided with a car driven by the defendant Jimmy Sanchez. The car had been rented by Claudia Hincapié, the wife of Sanchez’s cousin, from the defendant Citiwide Auto Leasing, Inc., doing business as Dollar Rent A Car (hereinafter Citiwide). Citiwide moved for summary judgment on the ground that it could not be held vicariously liable for the negligence of Sanchez because he was not an authorized user of the rented car.

The Supreme Court properly denied Citiwide’s motion. Citiwide failed to present evidence sufficient to rebut the presumption, arising from Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1), that a vehicle involved in a traffic accident is being operated with the permission of the owner *(see Leotta v Plessinger,*8 NY2d 449, 461 [1960]; *Walls v Zuvic,*113 AD2d 936 [1985]). As a commercial lessor of vehicles, Citiwide is deemed to have constructively consented to the operation of its vehicle by anyone using it with the lessee’s permission *(see Murdza v Zimmerman,*99 NY2d 375, 381-382 [2003]; *Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Continental Natl. Am. Group Co.,*35 NY2d 260, 265 [1974] ; *Lancer Ins. Co. v Republic Franklin Ins. Co.,*304 AD2d 794, 798 [2003]; *Allstate Ins. Co. v Dailey,*47 AD2d 375, 376 [1975] , *affd*39 NY2d 759 [1976]). While Hincapié submitted an affidavit generally asserting that Sanchez, who was living in her home, was driving the car without her permission at the time of the accident, that affidavit was contradicted in part by the police records regarding the accident and was not corroborated by any statement of Sanchez. Therefore it was insufficient under the circumstances to negate the statutory presumption as a matter of law *(see Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co. v Weyant,*309 AD2d 739 [ 2003]; *Roness v Hertz Corp. [Canada],*283 AD2d 416, 417 [2001]; *cf. Manning v Brown,*91 NY2d 116 [1997]; *Bost v Thomas,*275 AD2d 513, 514-515 [2000]; *Bruno v Privilegi,*148 AD2d 652, 653 [1989]). Accordingly, the issue of whether the car was operated with Hincapie’s permission is one of fact to be determined by a jury. S. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
No. 12-7765.

#### Gilbert *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Texas Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Texas Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,025  | 1,025  | 1,023 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,028  | 1,025  | 1,026  | 1,024  | 1,031  | 1,034  | 1,030  | 1,029  | 1,028  | 1,025 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,022  | 1,022  | 1,019  | 1,018  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7396.

#### Jones-El *v.*Webster et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           OF MEXCO ENERGY CORPORATION
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Tamala L. McComic, Chief Financial Officer of Mexco
Energy Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Tamala L. McComic
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Tamala L. McComic
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        August 12, 2004


                                    Page 18
**Exhibit31.1:**

 

**FORM OFCERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q**

 

I, Edward J. Kelly, III,certify that:

 

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation;

2)              Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

3)              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

c)              presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of ourdisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the EvaluationDate;

5)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation,  tothe registrant’s auditors and audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)             anyfraud, whether material or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and

6)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterlyreport whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in otherfactors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to thedate of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| /s/ Edward J. Kelly,  III              |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. Kelly, III                   |
| Chairman of the Board                  |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| November 8, 2004                  |

 

----
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-J1 (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, HSBC Bank (USA),
      SunTrust Mortgage Incorporated, Provident Funding Associates, LP,
      Wachovia Mortgage Corporation and Third Federal Savings & Loan
      Association.

Date: March 27, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       -----------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Siebert Financial Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Joseph M. Ramos, Jr., in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

|                                                     |  |                    
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|/s/ Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                             |  | Dated: May 17, 2010
|Joseph M. Ramos, Jr.                                 | 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 
|(principal financial and accounting
 officer)        | 

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be retained by
Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

18

---
P. 1



# RCRA Box 321
Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 202 ) OGRC-S0004. A
Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 202 of 259F12

_

^0"*% 

# < j 

# zy \ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y WASHINGTON , D.C

. 2046 0



### NO V 

### 6 199 0

OFFIC E O F SOL O WAST E AN O EMERGENC Y RESPONS E

Honorabl e Lloy

d Bentsen United State s Senat e Washington , D.C . 2051 0 Dea r Senato r Bentsen : Than k you fo

r you r lette r o f Octobe r l , 1990 , expressin g your concern s abou t the potentia l impact s o f th e Toxicit y Characteristi c (TC ) fina l rul e o n crud e oi l production . Th e Environmenta l Protectio n Agency

(EPA ) ha s onl y

recentl y becom e awar e o f the rule' s potentia l impact s o n crud e oi l reclamation activitie s o f th e type yo

u describe i n you r letter . The Assistan t Administrato r fo r th e Offic e o f Soli d Wast e an d Emergency

Respons e Do

n Cla y ha s been briefed o n thi s issu

e an d ha s asked u s t o examin e option s fo r dealin

g wit hit . EP

A i s workin g wit hthe Interstat e Oi l Compac t Commissio n (IOCC ) in thi s regar d t o collec t essentia l dat a t o determin e the exten t o f th e problem . Yo u shoul d b e awar e tha t thi s issu e ha s implication s fo r bot hthe T C an

d the completed regulator y determination wit h respec t t o the scop e o f the oi l exploration an d production exemption . The regulator y determinatio

n specified tha t th e exemptio

n applie s t o waste s generated o n o r nea r the wel l hea d site . Thus , off-sit e oi l reclamatio n i s no t covered unde r th e exemptio

n an d may , i f T C hazardous , be subjec t t o the hazardou s wast e regulations . Durin g th e publi c commen t process , EP A di d no t receiv

e an y comment s wit hrespec t t o thi s issue o n eithe r th

e regulator

y determination o r the T C rule . Pleas e b e assured tha t EP A i s activel y

working o

n thi s issu

e an d wil l d o it s bes t t o resolv e th e matte r i n the ver y nea r term . Than k you agai n for you r involvemen t in thi s issue . I wil l keep yo u informed a s t o an y actio n EP A take s t o addres s you r concerns . Sincerely , yours/ " Sylvi a K.^-^Lowrance^Birector Offic e o f Soli d Wast e

Printed m Rt. «
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40458 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SALOMON MENDOZA-ALVINO, also known as Nico Mendoza Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1343-1 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Salomon Mendoza-Alvino raises arguments that areforeclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-20230

2 appellant's motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### City of Long Beach, Matter of, v Long Beach Professional Firefighters Assn., Local 287

2d Dept: 143 AD3d 710

denied
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Joshua H. Levine, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Mentor Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)        theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; as amended; and

(2)       information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 Dated: August 8, 2005

/s/JOSHUA H. LEVINE