alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.17

SCHEDULE OF SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

          (a)     Timothy A. Dawson has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Company that is substantially identical to the Employment Agreement included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by that certain First Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, included as Exhibit 10.17 to this Form 10-Q, and that differs only with respect to the name of the person on the Agreement and the effective date of the Severance Agreement amended, restated and superseded by the Employment Agreement.

          (b)     C.E. McCraw and Robert E. Jones have entered into an Employment Agreement with the Company that is substantially identical to the Employment Agreement included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K by that certain First Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, included as Exhibit 10.17 to this Form 10-Q, and that differs only with respect to the name of the person on the Agreement and with respect to Section 3.e.(vii) thereof which states as follows:

"(vii) the Company will, at its own expense and until the earlier of Executive's 65th birthday and the tenth anniversary of the Termination Date, provide Executive with life insurance, disability and accidental death and dismemberment benefits at the highest level provided to Executive since the Effective Date hereof, *provided* that Executive has executed and delivered to the Company (and not revoked) the Release;"

          (c)     William L. Smith has entered into an Employment Agreement with the Company that is substantially identical to the Employment Agreement included as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by that certain First Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, included as Exhibit 10.17 to this Form 10-Q, and that differs only with respect to the name of the person on the Agreement and with respect to the following Sections: 2(a) - no Change of Control benefit; 2(c) - the Named Executive Officer will only devote partial time to the Company and may engage in the private practice of law; 2(e) - the Named Executive Officer is not entitled to vacation benefits; 3(b) - termination benefits limited to accrued unpaid salary except as otherwise required by law; 3(c) - termination benefits limited to unpaid salary for the remainder of the term; 3(d)-(h), 4-5, 7 - not applicable; Schedule A - Employment Term ends December 31, 2003.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: March 13, 2006/s/ Dennis J. StevermerDennis J. StevermerChief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13344]

[[Page 27756]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts; National Council on the Arts 
134th Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on June 1, 1998 from 2:00 
to 5:00 p.m. in Room 716 and on June 2, 1998 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:45 
p.m. in Room M-09 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW, Washington, D.C. 20506.
    The Council will meet in closed session on June 1, from 2:00 to 
5:00 p.m. for discussion of National Medal of Arts nominations. In 
accordance with the determination of the Chairman of May 14, 1998, this 
session will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) 
and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. The 
remainder of the meeting, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. on June 2, will 
be open to the public. Topics for discussion will include: Remarks by 
Robert Pinsky, Poet Laureate of the United States; a report on the 
Endowment's work with the Mayors' Institute on City Design; Federal 
Interagency Agreements; the Overview Policy Panel report; a Legislative 
update; budget update and preliminary discussion of the FY 2000 budget; 
Application Review; Folk & Traditional Arts Infrastructure Initiative 
Guidelines, a status report on the WritersCorps Program and general 
discussion.
    If, in the course of discussion, it becomes necessary for the 
Council to discuss non-public commercial or financial information of 
intrinsic value, the Council will go into closed session pursuant to 
subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b. 
Additionally, discussion concerning purely personal information about 
individuals, submitted with grant applications, such as personal 
biographical and salary data or medical information, may be conducted 
by the Council in closed session in accordance with subsection (c)(6) 
of 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend, as observers, Council 
discussions and reviews which are open to the public. If you need 
special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office 
of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, TTY-TDD 202/682-5429, 
at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from the Office of Communications, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, D.C. 20506, at 202/682-5570.

    Dated: May 13, 1998.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-13344 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
```
2017-1350.

#### Riverside Local Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2016-883. On joint motion to remand. Motion granted. Cause remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals.
*December 29, 2017*

2017-Ohio-9291.]

2016-1584.

#### Kolosai v. Azem.

Cuyahoga App. No. 102920, 2016-Ohio-5831. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Teresa Picken Sachs. Motion granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days.
No. 12-7577.

#### Whitmore *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________

No. 06-70003

______________________

DERRICK SONNIER

Petitioner - Appellant

v.

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, 

Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, 

Correctional Institutions Division

Respondent - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

Division

H-04-2385

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion, 1/22/07 5th Cir., Sonnier v.

Quarterman, 2007 WL 136460)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS,

Circuit Judges.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 9, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III
2

PER CURIAM:

It is ordered that the petitioner-appellant’s

Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. In light

of petitioner-appellant’s brief in support of his

petition for rehearing, we have carefully

reconsidered our panel opinion and reiterate that

our denial of a certificate of appealability

(“COA”) is based upon Sonnier’s failure to make a

“substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right,” as required by 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2). 

Applying the Supreme Court’s analysis

established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S.

668 (1984), the district court determined that

Sonnier failed to show that his trial counsel

provided ineffective assistance in violation of

the Sixth Amendment. Our panel opinion clearly

held that Sonnier “failed to demonstrate that
3

jurists of reason could disagree with the district

court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or

that jurists could conclude that the issues

presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to

proceed further, as required by the United States

Supreme Court’s interpretation of 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(2) in Miller El v. Cockrell.” Sonnier v.

Quarterman, 2007 WL 136460 at *14. As a result,

we denied his request for a COA. 

After careful consideration of Sonnier’s brief

in support of his petition for panel rehearing, we

still do not believe that he is entitled to a COA.

“By enacting AEDPA,. . . Congress confirmed the

necessity and the requirement of differential

treatment for those appeals deserving of attention

from those that plainly do not. . . [I]ssuance of

a COA must not be pro forma or a matter of

course.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 337
4

(2003). Sonnier argues that the panel delved too

deeply into the merits of his ineffective

assistance of counsel claim. However, “[t]he COA

determination under § 2253(c) requires an overview

of the claims in the habeas petition and a general

assessment of their merits.” Id. at 336. And our

threshold inquiry into Sonnier’s ineffective

assistance of counsel claim revealed that

reasonable jurists would not find the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claim

debatable or wrong. Specifically, no reasonable

jurist would find debatable or wrong that Sonnier

had failed to show prejudice as required by

Strickland. 

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  undersigned,  A.  F.  Petrocelli,  Chairman,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of United Capital Corp., (the "Company"),
does hereby  certify,  with  respect to the  Quarterly  Report of the Company on
Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 4, 2005

                                                     By: /s/ A. F. Petrocelli
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         A. F. Petrocelli
                                                         Chairman, President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
```
2017-1363.

#### State v. Fetherolf.

Union App. No. 14-16-10, 2017-Ohio-1316. On appellant’s motion to strike document from record. Motion denied as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28386-28387]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated

[[Page 28387]]

or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 9, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Commerce Bancorp, Cherry Hill, Pennsylvania; to acquire Commerce 
Capital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and thereby engage in Tier II 
securities underwriting and dealing and related activites, including 
bonds issued by not-for-profit entities that qualify under Section 
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code for a tax exempt status; and 
bonds issued by private entities that qualify under Section 142(d) of 
the Internal Revenue Code for a partially tax exempt status (subject to 
only to the alternative minimum tax). See Citicorp, 75 Fed. Res. Bull., 
751 (1989) & 83 Fed. Res. Bull. 510 (1997).
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. CITBA Financial Corporation, Mooresville, Indiana; to acquire 
Independent Bankers Life Insurance Company of Indiana, Phoenix, 
Arizona, a reinsurance subsidiary, and thereby indirectly engage in 
underwriting credit life, accident and health insurance directly 
related to extensions of credit by the banks and bank holding companies 
owning stock in the insurance agency, pursuant to Sec.  
225.28(b)(11)(i) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 19, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-13788 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | --     | 12.72  | 10.00  | 8.69   | 8.07   | 8.63   | 8.51   | 7.19  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.09   | 7.11   | 8.09   | 4.74   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# L_2010126EN.01001201.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 126/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 126/12

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 444/2010

of 21 May 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pemento da Arnoia (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pemento da Arnoia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pemento da Arnoia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 May 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 222, 15.9.2009, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Pemento da Arnoia (PGI)

---
Exhibit 32.1

# Mestek, Inc.

260 North Elm StreetWestfield,
Massachusetts 01085

(Certification
Issued Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, John E. Reed, certify that:

|1. |  | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Mestek, Inc.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | I have read the quarterly report of Mestek, Inc. filed on Form 10-Q for the
               quarter ending September 30, 2003 (the Report), including the
               financial statements contained in the Report.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in this quarterly
               report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
               results of operations of Mestek, Inc. for and as of the period described.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November ___, 2003