alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 1, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
W. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Douglas W. Dougherty
-------------------------
Douglas W. Dougherty
Chief Financial Officer
February 15, 2005
No. 12-223.

No. 12-230.

#### Chafee, Governor of Rhode Island *v.*United States et al.; and Pleau *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 680 F. 3d 1.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 6,704  | 9,650 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3,378  | 0      | 3,219  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Firstar Bank, N.A., Appellant, v Don M. Palmer, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[767 NYS2d 889]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated September 13, 2002, which, after a hearing, granted the motion of the defendant Don Michael Palmer to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale for lack of in personam jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that a decision rendered by a court after a hearing should not be disturbed unless it is clear that its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Richard’s Home Ctr. & Lbr. v Kraft,*199 AD2d 254 [1993]; *Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest.,*169 AD2d 829 [1991]).

The record supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the respondent was not properly served. Moreover, the court was in the best position to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses who testified before it and we will not disturb its determination in that regard *(see Richard’s Home Ctr. & Lbr. v Kraft, supra; Universal Leasing Servs. v Flushing Hae Kwan Rest., supra).*Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            106,890
<SECURITIES>                                      192,594
<RECEIVABLES>                                     634,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                       10,412
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                             38,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                     12,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,152,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0
<BONDS>                                           248,875
<COMMON>                                              293
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        19,351
<OTHER-SE>                                         42,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,152,669
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   44,096
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   29,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    2,157
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     6,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                        2,398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 4,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        4,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      27,977.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      27,977.00
        

</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 133

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the appointment of

health care professionals to the positions of the Surgeon General of

the Army, the Surgeon General of the Navy, and the Surgeon General

of the Air Force.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the

appointment of health care professionals to the positions

of the Surgeon General of the Army, the Surgeon General of the Navy, and the Surgeon General of the Air

Force.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SURGEON GENERAL OF THE ARMY.

4 Section 3036 of title 10, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) in subsection (b), by inserting before the pe7 riod at the end of the third sentence the following:
2

•S 133 IS

1 ‘‘and shall be appointed as prescribed in subsection

2 (f)’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section (f):

5 ‘‘(f) The President shall appoint the Surgeon General

6 from among commissioned officers in any corps of the

7 Army Medical Department who are educationally and pro8 fessionally qualified to furnish health care to other per9 sons, including doctors of medicine, dentistry, and osteop10 athy, nurses, and clinical psychologists.’’.

11 SEC. 2. SURGEON GENERAL OF THE NAVY.

12 Section 5137 of title 10, United States Code, is

13 amended—

14 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by

15 striking out ‘‘in the Medical Corps’’ and inserting in

16 lieu thereof ‘‘who are educationally and profes17 sionally qualified to furnish health care to other per18 sons, including doctors of medicine, dentistry, and

19 osteopathy, nurses, and clinical psychologists’’; and

20 (2) in subsection (b), by striking out ‘‘in the

21 Medical Corps’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘who is

22 qualified to be the Chief of the Bureau of Medicine

23 and Surgery’’.
3

•S 133 IS

1 SEC. 3. SURGEON GENERAL OF THE AIR FORCE.

2 The first sentence of section 8036 of title 10, United

3 States Code, is amended by striking out ‘‘designated as

4 medical officers under section 8067(a) of this title’’ and

5 inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘educationally and professionally

6 qualified to furnish health care to other persons, including

7 doctors of medicine, dentistry, and osteopathy, nurses, and

8 clinical psychologists’’.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 361

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1789

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the use of funds under

the highway bridge replacement and rehabilitation program for seismic

retrofit of bridges, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 25, 1994

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. HATFIELD) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

FEBRUARY 4 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, without amendment

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to permit the use

of funds under the highway bridge replacement and rehabilitation program for seismic retrofit of bridges, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SEISMIC RETROFIT OF BRIDGES.

4 Section 144 of title 23, United States Code, is

5 amended—
2

S 1789 RS

1 (1) in the third sentence of subsection (d), by

2 inserting before the period at the end the following:

3 ‘‘, except that a State may carry out a project for

4 seismic retrofit of a bridge under this section with5 out regard to whether the bridge is eligible for re6 placement or rehabilitation under this section’’; and

7 (2) in subsection (e), by adding at the end the

8 following new sentence: ‘‘The use of funds author9 ized under this section to carry out a project for the

10 seismic retrofit of a bridge shall not affect the ap11 portionment of funds under this section.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.59

                 AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, (the "AMENDMENT")
is effective as of November 11, 1999 (the "EFFECTIVE DATE"), between STAR
TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY") and DAVID VAUN
CRUMLY (the "EMPLOYEE").

RECITALS:

         A. The Company (or STAR Vending, Inc. a Nevada corporation, predecessor
in interest to the Company) and Employee are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement effective January 1, 1996, as amended by Amendment Number One to
Employment Agreement effective as of November 11, 1997 and by Amendment Number
Two to Employment Agreement effective as of April 21, 1999 (collectively the
"Employment Agreement"), pursuant to which Employee is employed by the Company.

         B. The parties desire to modify certain terms of the Employment
Agreement, as set forth in this Amendment.

AGREEMENT:

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:

         1. DEFINED TERMS. Capitalized terms used in this Agreement and not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment
Agreement. From and after the date hereof, the term "Agreement" as used in the
Employment Agreement will mean the Employment Agreement as amended by this
Agreement, unless and until such Employment Agreement may again be amended.

         2. AMENDMENT OF EXHIBITS A, B AND D. Exhibits A, B and D are hereby
amended in their entirety as set forth in Exhibits A, B and D attached hereto
and incorporated herein.

         3. CONFIRMATION. Except as specifically amended by the Amendment, the
Employment Agreement will continue unchanged, and the terms and conditions of
the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, are ratified and
confirmed.

[signature page to follow]

Third Amendment to Employment Agreement
Page 1


<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, that parties have executed this Amendment effective
as of the date first set forth above.

                                      "COMPANY"

                                      STAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

                                      A Delaware corporation

                                      By:
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             Mary Casey
                                             President

                                      "EMPLOYEE"

                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      David Vaun Crumly


Third Amendment to Employment Agreement
Page 2
|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                                 
|Virginia Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                 
|Virginia Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 16.13  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12.64  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2011-0857.

#### State v. Obermiller.

Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR542119. On appellant’s application for reopening pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 11.06. Application denied.

O’Neill, J., dissents.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

In connection with the annual report of Golden Queen Mining Co.
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Dated: April 2, 2008 | /s/ Lutz Klingmann                                               
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Lutz Klingmann                                                   
|                     | Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer

---
<PAGE>


                             UTILICORP UNITED INC.
                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (dollars in thousands)
                            Interest Coverage Ratios

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                 12 months ended                          Years ended Dec 31,
                                                  June 30, 1998      1997          1996          1995          1994         1993
                                                 ---------------   ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Income from continuing operations
  before provision for income taxes................  $190,843      $223,800      $186,460      $131,812      $146,532     $116,366

Add:
  Interest on long-term debt.......................   128,004       124,357       126,933       110,227        89,526       89,027

  Interest on short-term debt and other............    10,186        10,879        18,151        16,847         7,257        7,207

  Portion of rents representative of the
    interest factor................................    15,782        17,548        16,537        15,346        15,329       15,008
                                                     --------      ---------------------------------------------------------------

Income as adjusted.................................  $344,815      $376,584      $348,081      $274,232      $258,644     $227,608
                                                     --------      ---------------------------------------------------------------


Fixed Charges

  Interest on long-term debt.......................  $128,004      $124,357      $126,933      $110,227      $ 89,526     $ 89,027

  Interest on short-term debt......................    10,186        10,879        18,151        16,847         7,257        7,207

  Portion of rents representative of the
    interest factor................................    15,782        17,548        16,537        15,346        15,329       15,008
                                                     --------      ---------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed Charges......................................  $153,972      $152,784      $161,621      $142,420      $112,112     $111,242
                                                     --------      ---------------------------------------------------------------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES.................      2.24          2.46          2.15          1.93          2.31         2.06
                                                     --------      ---------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Price of  Freeport, TX Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Price of  Freeport, TX Natural Gas Exports to India (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.56   | 8.66   | 11.10  | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.67   | 7.93   | --     | 4.63   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024