alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2010098EN.01001301.xml

| 20.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/13

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 318/2010 of 16 April 2010 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 97 of 17 April 2010
  )

On page 12, in the title, the official number of the Regulation:

for:

‘(EU) No 318/2010’

read:

‘(EU) No 319/2010.’

---
Contact Information:

Sarah Folsland, Communications: (605) 721-1609 

Jason Ketchum, Investor Relations: (605) 721-7265 

Media Relations: (866) 243-9002

BLACK HILLS POWER TO SUSPEND OPERATIONS AT 62-YEAR-OLD OSAGE 

POWER PLANT 

Reduction in regional demand for electricity

OSAGE, Wyo. — Sept. 9, 2010 — Black Hills Corp. (NYSE:BKH) subsidiary Black Hills 

Power today announced suspension of operations at its 62-year-old, 34.5-megawatt coal-fired Osage 

Power Plant in Osage, Wyo., beginning Oct. 1, 2010. 

 “Considering the slow economic recovery that continues to impact the demand for electricity in 

the Western region, Black Hills Power has elected to suspend operations at Osage. We now have 

other generation alternatives available to us that are more economical as we continue to provide lowcost, reliable energy for our customers,” said Chuck Loomis, vice president of operations for Black 

Hills Power. “The Osage Power Plant will remain an asset in our generation portfolio, and all 

operating permits will be retained so we can resume full operations when needed.” 

BHP employs 18 people at the Osage plant. After the generation is suspended on Oct. 1, the 

employees will continue working until about Oct. 15, 2010, to prepare the equipment at the plant for 

the suspension. Black Hills Power is evaluating each Osage employee’s individual situation and 

discussing alternative employment options available within the company. In addition, outplacement 

services will be available if needed. No other suspensions of operations at Black Hills Power facilities 

are planned. 

Black Hills Power, Inc. 

Black Hills Power is the legacy utility business of Black Hills Corp. (NYSE: BKH) and has been delivering energy for more 

than 125 years. The electric utility serves 66,900 customers in 25 communities in western South Dakota, northeastern 

Wyoming, and southeastern Montana. 

Black Hills Corporation 

Black Hills Corp. — a diversified energy company with a tradition of exemplary service and a vision to be the energy 

partner of choice — is based in Rapid City, S.D., with corporate offices in Denver and Omaha, Neb. The company serves 

763,300 natural gas and electric utility customers in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, South Dakota and 

Wyoming. The company’s non-regulated businesses generate wholesale electricity, produce natural gas, oil and coal, and 

market energy. Black Hills’ 2,200 employees partner to produce results that improve life with energy. More information is 

available at www.blackhillscorp.com. 

###
EXHIBIT
32.2

















CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the undersigned, Anthony J. Miceli, Chief Financial Officer of United
Capital Corp., (the “Company”), does hereby certify, with respect to the
Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008
(the “Report”) that:







1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  August
6, 2008








By:
            /s/
      Anthony J. MiceliAnthony
      J. MiceliChief
      Financial Officer
Activity NameDurationStartFinishPhase 1 CI Approval0.0d22-Sep-04 AFeasibility Studies182.0d22-Sep-04 A22-Mar-05 APhase 2a CI Approval0.0d23-Mar-05 AEngineering, Permitting,Procurement, Contracting223.0d23-Mar-05 A31-Oct-05 APhase 2b CI Approval0.0d01-Nov-05 ADesign, Procurement Fabrication,Site Prep468.0d01-Nov-05 A11-Feb-07 APhase 3 CI Approval0.0d12-Feb-07 AConstruction, Start-Up,Commissioning, Turnover840.0d12-Feb-07 A01-Jun-09 ATie-In Outage97.0d23-Feb-09 A31-May-09 AFGD & SCR In-Service0.0d01-Jun-09 AConstruction Complete0.0d01-Jun-09 AQ3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q40420052006200720082009Phase 1 CI ApprovalFeasibility StudiesPhase 2a CI ApprovalEngineering, Permitting, Procurement, ContractingPhase 2b CI ApprovalDesign, Procurement Fabrication, Site PrepPhase 3 CI ApprovalConstructionTie-In OutagFGD & SCRConstructionConesville 4 FGD, SCR, and Associated ProjectsAEP Summary ScheduleReport Run: 10-Apr-12Actual WorkRemaining WorkCritical Remaining WorkMilestonePage 1 of 1TASK filter: All ActivitiesSummary schedules are based on actual project datesActivity NameDurationStartFinishPhase 1 CI Approval0.0d01-Oct-01 AFeasibility Studies854.0d01-Oct-01 A02-Feb-04 APhase 2a CI Approval0.0d02-Feb-04 AEngineering, Permitting,Procurement, Contracting135.0d02-Feb-04 A16-Jun-04 APhase 2b CI Approval0.0d16-Jun-04 ADesign, Procurement,Fabrication, Site Prep253.0d16-Jun-04 A24-Feb-05 APhase 3 CI Approval0.0d24-Feb-05 AConstruction, Start-Up,Commissioning, Turnover802.0d24-Feb-05 A07-May-07 AUnit 2 Outage114.0d23-Sep-06 A15-Jan-07 AUnit 1 Outage98.0d20-Jan-07 A28-Apr-07 AUnit 2 FGD In-Service0.0d26-Jan-07 AUnit 1 FGD In-Service0.0d28-Apr-07 A3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4200220032004200520062007Phase 1 CI ApprovalFeasibility StudiesPhase 2a CI ApprovalEngineering, Permitting, Procurement, ContractingPhase 2b CI ApprovalDesign, Procurement, Fabrication, Site PrepPhase 3 CI ApprovalConstructioUnit 2 OutageUnit 1 OutagUnit 2 FGD In-SeUnit 1 FGDMitchell 1 & 2 FGD, SCR, and Associated ProjectsAEP Summary ScheduleReport Run: 10-Apr-12Actual WorkRemaining WorkCritical Remaining WorkMilestonePage 1 of 1TASK filter: All ActivitiesSummary schedules are based on actual project dates
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5



<S>                                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                         JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                                              APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                      6,284,865
<SECURITIES>                                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              14,776,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  232,034
<INVENTORY>                                                                14,005,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                           36,648,958
<PP&E>                                                                     28,300,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                                             15,008,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                             69,131,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                      14,468,516
<BONDS>                                                                    11,440,578
<COMMON>                                                                      719,307
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                 43,679,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                               69,131,351
<SALES>                                                                    20,250,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                           20,250,931
<CGS>                                                                      13,473,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              17,401,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                            184,831
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                             2,761,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                1,007,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                                1,753,284
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                       .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                     .28


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              
|                                                                                                              
|Price of Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 15.63  | 21.36  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1565

To delay the effective date of regulations issued by the Secretary of Housing

and Urban Development governing the admission of single persons into

public and assisted housing for the elderly.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. WOFFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To delay the effective date of regulations issued by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development governing

the admission of single persons into public and assisted

housing for the elderly.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Older Americans’

5 Housing Preservation Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITED MORATORIUM.

7 (a) DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.—Notwithstanding

8 any other provision of law, effective on the date of enact-
2

•S 1565 IS

1 ment of this Act, parts 812, 905, 912, and 960 of title

2 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as amended to imple3 ment section 573(a) of the National Affordable Housing

4 Act of 1990, shall not apply to public and assisted housing

5 developed as an elderly housing project with the approval

6 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development

7 (hereafter in this section referred to as the ‘‘Department’’)

8 before the date on which the Secretary of Housing and

9 Urban Development (hereafter in this section referred to

10 as the ‘‘Secretary’’) issues final regulations implementing

11 section 621 of the Housing and Community Development

12 Act of 1992.

13 (b) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.—During the period

14 beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending

15 on the date on which the Secretary issues final regulations

16 implementing section 621 of the Housing and Community

17 Development Act of 1992, parts 812, 905, 912, and 960

18 of title 24, Code of Federal Regulations, as such parts

19 existed prior to the effective date of the regulations issued

20 to implement section 573(a) of the National Affordable

21 Housing Act of 1990, shall apply to public and assisted

22 housing developed as an elderly project with the approval

23 of the Department.

Æ
# For+**f3er~t-t>ld M·~w** **N~f- er** **rut%~ ~**  

# ·**~11/~l(** 

### 0



# --

# /Ja~M-e-**C'o(\(_~** PYt.on.e

# £"~!**~em &lhi~** **5f~Jflt)~** "1ZJ

. 4fi:l

. '1821

### ksqfht~e**sl/lW.S<M~~·**



# ____ Fed**~** 

# _ Mltf+ (t3+ld\

_ 

### 76 t-L/2 /

·**o3~( ~~** **em~evta--'-'01) c~** **~ ~~** **\-\~V\i-** 

### AS\ A- OE.,MO 303-**2Lf2~4538 j~~ve~.** **hv~@ b~-t.** **<SO V** **M~J-"'** MAJhlc.r**~~P. E"u:~** 

## 1 _**~3-IAo· A#J.t~** **M,.U..~Ic,.ea~rres a..-** 

## ~1..1**f-1,"t.E1~ ~et'**  bJt;f.b'f

_

## ~~·,1t-·6'1oo**co-;.1.11!~~ ~~?K**  

# JJ191/ wED

## 3C'JyqJ-s?t!:J~**..J·eepqx.I~~ ,_,_J** 

# bl4L~M'**~E? R~**  .. tc£s

_ 5dJ-30t-l,1o

# ."t**-(~r-rr~** 

# ..

____**~_D ~5-(GS**  N8"Nf.,e..ld**~o:s.** 38 3Al'i-Z**'br 5~c-** **.s@NM~ek\ -<..~""'-** 



### ___ Ro {\) 

## f ),..,c,-f. /C..odi(]Jk..**:?>OJ.-.!>-q~-fiO'l.q f2.fi~<lli£,J:a!.** **o&.c<Jno-**



## ____ - /J

. -**~~** T"#

### J.~sAI/1**~'1//fb~l..** Jt>3 • Cfd t.j

...

### ~.s-2,.5"' 

# f?, • /4. G )e.fc,r

. i'crl'l**~ ~)...D** **~AJ s~~** **~~s(.r~.S=t€,~ brfiY.2x>J.Soo...~-~Y'l**  \

. /1**w.ll~**

_ _._ __**..u.- ~.J){;t(..L**  ;vr f 6aur Wt c.. t., J 

### kt'U-.5:>**3~3 ?ot.~:-**  f!os(, jod.a.U.**~c~-oa:-> <?**  ·Ocrtc

/1/**MEtf4'~ ~IV~w~~** **M*'~~e~~.Nfe,v;r.v~@.** 

### Htkl!f. t?etFJ!!£-**~~** l..ler4-)(k,..; I J'o 7-:<.1' ,2**-~J>o3 ~w~tsr~t~4** **.;AJ~** r



# ____ --;;;;'! !..v<-f!-VV

## ~f./vs**4,;;.,"~5** yo ;)lf/.>5'/2-

## -1/u~.._.,;~-<'f~**-~ ~v.t_k.**  

### _.J;.,je.- 

### AfviP..Ai?' 3o ;- $11-3/JZ-

### ~J~Jeo~te_a.f.tJ/o.,,x~~

### ~~**~vaNe** 

### -AQl).otJ,x: 720 -3Y7-1 11a,**j~o~ea1JM00·Vc..c.-oAA**

## -------+1**ii/er~A~r;//** _ Aq_u.. \ DY1\.X

_ ?20

- 34':1- 

### 8tdo3

## ~clll@at(fuarllt.LOm

Jo• -tlt 

### M**~M t:c~~k**  

### 'i.T U 1'7**f~** ">**'J ~**  f' Z**~-""-»-<M-~.n~lb.OA.:~~** f,



### ... -4o5-**~-** 3'Z J.S



### ---
No. 12-8467.

#### Andrade-Torres, aka Estrada-Medina *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7869.

#### Boniecki *v.*Stewart et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari before judgment denied.
#### Owens, Matter of, v Pound

4th Dept: 145 AD3d 1643

denied*
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lottery & Wagering Solution, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Miles R. Greenberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             S/  Miles R. Greenberg
                                             -------------------------------
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             October 14, 2003
*April 17, 2017*

2017-Ohio-1411.]

2017-0474.

#### McGirr v. Winkler.

In Prohibition. On relators’ motion for emergency stay. Motion granted. On motion for leave of Eric W. Goering, assignee of Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co., L.P.A., to intervene as respondent. Motion granted. Relators may file a response to the motion to dismiss within the timeframe permitted by the Rules of Practice.

O’Donnell and Kennedy, JJ., dissent in part and would deny the motion to dismiss and would grant an alternative writ.

O’Neill, J., not participating.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6220
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TRUMAN SCOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:98-cr-00079-F) Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Truman Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Truman Scott appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Disclosure of Grand Jury Material.” We have reviewed the record and find no clear error in the district court’s denial. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 800 F.2d 1293, 1298-99 (4th Cir. 1986) (stating review standard). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1707 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1707

             To suspend temporarily the duty on keto ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

  Mr. Wofford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on keto ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY DUTY SUSPENSION.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new heading:

       ``  9902.31.12  Ethyl 2-keto-4-phenylbutanoate (keto ester) (provided for                   No change        No change        On or before 12/   
                        in subheading 2918.30.20)...............................  Free                                                31/96           ''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 applies with respect to articles 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted February 1, 2018 *

Decided February 1, 2018

Before

DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

AMY C. BARRETT, Circuit Judge

No. 17-2388

MICHELLE LUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant ,

v

.
HEBRON HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY, INC., Defendant-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 15-C-1127

Lynn Adelman, J udge

.

O R D E R
Michelle Lundy, an African-American woman, filed this lawsuit against the operator of Hebron House, a homeless shelter, under the Fair Housing Act. She alleged that the shelter discriminated against her base d on her race by unfairly requiring her to vacate the shelter after 90 days and denyin g her access to a rental-assistance program. The district court entered summary judgment for Hebron House, reasoning that Lundy had not adduced sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact about

* We have agreed to decide the case wi thout oral argument because the appeal is frivolous. F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2)(A). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited onl y in accordance with Fed. R. A pp . P. 32.1No. 17-2388 Page 2

whether the shelter’s decision s were race-based and whether the shelter, as opposed to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urba n Development, had any decision-making authority with respect to rental assistance.
Lundy appeals and contends that “remand is required because the appellees discriminated based on race and [failed] to accurately follow HUD [guidelines] for the Homeless Prevention / Rapid Re-Housing Program.” That is the sum total of her argument; she does not claim to have raised any material disputes of fact backed up with evidence, nor does she cite any legal authority that supports her broad conclusion. Instead she recounts her personal history and repeats allegations from her complaint (and in her reply brief, attempts to add new factual allegations).
We construe pro se filings liberally, Anderson v. Hardman , 241 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 2001), but we cannot meaningfully re view an appellate argument that consists of a single bald conclusion. Even pro se litigants must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(8), see Anderson , 241 F.3d at 545–46, which requires that a brief contain a cogent argument with citation s to authority. Although we “are generally disposed toward providing a litigant the benefit of appellate review,” we will not concoct arguments or conduct legal research for a litigant. Id . at 545. Because Lundy has not presented an argument, we must dismiss her appeal.

DISMISSED