alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2015273DE.01001501.xml

| 17.10.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 273/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 273/15

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1070/2010 der Kommission vom 22. November 2010 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2008/38/EG durch Aufnahme der Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthritis bei Hunden und Katzen als besonderer Ernährungszweck in das Verzeichnis der Verwendungszwecke

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 306 vom 23. November 2010
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 306 vom 23. November 2010

Deckblatt und Seite 42, Titel:

anstatt:

„Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthritis“

muss es heißen:

„Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthrose“;

Seite 42, Erwägungsgrund 1:

anstatt:

„‚Unterstützung der Gelenkfunktion bei Osteoarthritis‘“

muss es heißen:

„‚Unterstützung der Gelenkfunktion bei Osteoarthrose‘“;

Seite 42, Erwägungsgrund 2:

anstatt:

„‚Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthritis‘“

muss es heißen:

„‚Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthrose‘“;

Seite 43, Anhang zur Änderung des Anhangs I Teil B der Richtlinie 2008/38/EG, erste Spalte:

anstatt:

„Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthritis“

muss es heißen:

„Unterstützung des Gelenkstoffwechsels bei Osteoarthrose“.

---
2016-1115.

#### State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Pike Cty. Coroner’s Office.

In Mandamus. On motion to submit documents for in camera inspection. Motion granted in part and denied in part. Respondent shall file the unredaeted autopsy reports under seal within 14 days. No additional materials shall be submitted.

*1441O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., would grant the motion in full and permit respondent to file both the unredacted reports as well as additional material explaining the reasons for the proposed redaction.

French and DeWine, JJ., not participating.
No. 12-7993.

#### Word v. United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Cove Point, MD  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Cove Point, MD  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Turkiye (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb   | Mar   | Apr | May   | Jun | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct   | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----
|2018                                                                                                                              |       |       |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |       |       | 3,186
|2020                                                                                                                              | 2,818 | 6,604 |       |     | 6,661 |     | 3,222 |     |       |       | 3,078 |      
|2021                                                                                                                              | 6,225 |       |       |     |       |     |       |     | 2,545 | 3,175 | 6,717 |      
|2022                                                                                                                              | 6,430 |       | 2,761 |     |       |     |       |     | 1,022 |       | 3,486 | 3,307
|2023                                                                                                                              |       | 3,215 |       |     |       |     |       |     |       | 847   | 6,630 | 6,376
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6963.

#### Knox *v.*Walker, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-31 MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Delaine H. Gruber. certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10QSB of Mineral
Mountain Mining and Milling Company.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and
15d-15e)for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business
issuer is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my
conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2004
/s/ Delaine H. Gruber
-----------------------------------
Delaine H. Gruber, President and Director
No. 12-8082.

#### Breland *v.*Louisiana.

Sup. Ct. La. Certio-rari denied.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------





                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                    ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-14
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-14


     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 16 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00194- CR NO. 14- 18 -00195- CR NO. 14- 18 -00196- CR NO. 14- 18 -00197- CR

DARIOS TRAMAIN CRAYTON-SCOTT, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1484225 , 1511723 , 1511724, and 1511725

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant , Darios Tramain Crayton

- Scott, appeals his convictions for aggravated assault and aggravated robbery. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § § 22.02(a)(1), (a)(2), 29.03(a)(2) . Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she
concludes the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The br ief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a2

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811

– 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised
of his right to inspect the appellate records and file a pro se response to the brief. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date , more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel’s brief and agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the
records . We are not t o address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v.
State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the trial court’s judgments are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Bourliot, and Zimmerer
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           OF MEXCO ENERGY CORPORATION
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


I, Nicholas C. Taylor,  Chief Executive Officer of Mexco Energy Corporation (the
"Company"),  hereby certify that the accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2005 and filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the "Report") by the Company fully complies with the  requirements of that
section.

I further certify that the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of the operations
of the Company.



                                        /s/ Nicholas C. Taylor
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Nicholas C. Taylor
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 11, 2005


                                    page 15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL
POSITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,261
<INVENTORY>                                     52,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,416
<PP&E>                                       3,022,964
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,509,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,166,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          341,408
<BONDS>                                        642,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     796,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,166,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               630,235
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (460)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,803
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,890
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    70,927
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Jose Felton, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 416]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from the unauthorized use of controlled substances after his urine twice tested positive for the *1034presence of cannabinoids. Substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt is found in the misbehavior report, the positive laboratory test results with their supporting documentation, and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who prepared the misbehavior report after collecting petitioner’s urine specimen and performing the laboratory tests thereon *(see Matter of Valerio v Selsky,*306 AD2d 713 [2003]; *Matter of Tingue v McCoy,*299 AD2d 779 [2002]). Petitioner’s contention that he was improperly denied the right to call a witness has been examined and found to be meritless.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
No. 12-7180.

#### Qamar *v.*Central Intelligence Agency et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Georgia Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Georgia Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,032  | 1,026  | 1,027 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,022  | 1,018  | 1,015  | 1,016  | 1,020  | 1,027  | 1,030  | 1,030  | 1,028  | 1,026 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,029  | 1,028  | 1,029  | 1,029  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Marcos RAMOS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2354

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-13580CF10A.

Affirmed.
No. 12-7495.

#### Tate *v.*Hartley, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7126.

#### Tobar *v.*McEwen, Acting Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7826.

#### Andrews *v.*Paxson.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Vessel to Philippines (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Vessel to Philippines (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 6,823  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
October 5, 2010

VIA E-MAIL TO PATRICK AU

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section

Emissions Assessment Branch

Stationary Source Division

Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Subject: 1) Submittals of Amended Rule 901 (New Source Performance Standards [NSPS]) and a Negative 

Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Regulations on Emission Guidelines for 

Existing Sources,

2) Request to Submit a Delegation of Authority Request to EPA on the Behalf of Santa Barbara 

County APCD to Implement and Enforce the Appropriate NSPS Listed in Rule 901, and

3) Request to Submit a Request to EPA on the Behalf of Santa Barbara County to Modify the State 

Plan to Reflect that there are no Designated Facilities Located in Santa Barbara County for the 

Seven Emission Guidelines Identified in the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules

Dear Mr. Guzzetta:

On September 20, 2010, the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Board of Directors held a public 

hearing on adopting 1) proposed amendments to Rule 901, New Source Performance Standards, and 2) a Negative 

Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Regulations on Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources. 

After the public hearing, the Board adopted amended Rule 901 and the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules. 

Attached are the following documents relative to the Board approvals: 

1. Amended Rule 901, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), 

2. Copy of the Public Notice for the proposed amended Rule 901 Board Hearing and the proposed Negative 

Declaration in Lieu of Rules Board Hearing,

3. September 16, 2010 Agenda (includes “Discussion” and Announcements”) and a Staff Report for Agenda Items 

on September 16, 2010 Calendar

4. Signed Resolution and Minute Order for amended Rule 901,

5. Board of Directors Agenda Packet for amending Rule 901,

6. Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules to Adopt Certain Federal Emission Guidelines and Negative Declaration 

Findings,

7. Signed Resolution and Minute Order for the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules, and

8. Board of Directors Agenda Packet

We are not submitting Rule 901 or the Negative Declaration in Lieu of Rules for inclusion into the State 

Implementation Plan. Hence, we are not including SIP Completeness Checklists with this package.

The Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District requests the Air Resources Board to request on our behalf

that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:

1. Grant delegation authority to us for the appropriate New Source Performance Standards listed in Rule 901, 

and