alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Oc;t(}ber-21,20 14 

Memorandum 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

October 22, 2014 Teleconference Between the National Tribal Air 

Association (NTAA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Outreach 

Chris Stoneman, 

and Information 

Policy Advisor 

Division, 

cL ~ 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the main discussion 

points made at the subject meeting during the comment period for the proposed 

rule: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source 

Review Program in Indian Country." (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014) 

Teleconference details: 

When: October 22, 2014; 2:00- 3:00pm ET 

Participants: Laura McKelvey, EPA, OAQPS 

Chris Stoneman, EPA, OAQPS 

Toni Colon, EPA, OAQPS 

Lisa Beckham, EPA, Region 9 

Kevin Greenleaf, Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 

Brandy Toft, Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe 

Bill Thompson, Penobscot Indian Nation 

Wilfred Nabahe, Colorado River Indian Tribes 

Andy Bessler, NT AA 

To start the teleconference, EPA provided an overview of the EPA effort underway 

to issue general permits/permits by rule for true minor sources in Indian country, 

including the latest Bundle #2 proposal. Following the general overview, EPA went 

through in detail the proposed general permits for engines (spark ignition and 

compression ignition) and boilers. The EPA explained the purpose of each permit 

and the rationale for the permits' requirements. 

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the proposed rule and will be 

available for public review. 

..
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: December 13, 2006/s/ DENNIS J. STEVERMERDennis J. StevermerChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Siebert Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Muriel F. Siebert, in my capacity as Chairwoman and
President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1.          the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the
Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by
the Report.

| |                                                        |  |                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
| | /s/ Muriel F. Siebert                                  |  | Dated: August 16, 2010
| | Muriel F. Siebert                                      |  |                       
| | Chairwoman and President (principal executive officer) | 

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Siebert Financial Corp. and will be
retained by Siebert Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

55

---
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Portugal (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | 0      | 2,618  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 53,342
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 36,922 | 65,865 | 69,583 | 72,856 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group C (Electro-Optics) of the DoD Advisory Group on 
Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0830, Wednesday and 0800, Thursday, 
June 3 and 4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group C meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
opto-electronic device area includes such programs as imaging device, 
infrared detector and lasers. The review will include details of 
classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d) (1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
Sec. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be 
closed to the public.

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-13374 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
# C_2010171EN.01000201.xml

| 30.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5802 — RWE Energy/Mitgas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 171/03

On 17 June 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5802. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5802. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|No chart available.                                                            
|No chart available.                                                            
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|New York Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7455.

#### Lowery *v.*North Carolina.

Ct. App. N. C. Certiorari denied.
Index of Documents for Public Comment Period

for 

Proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement Modification

Kansas City Structural Steel Superfund Site

Kansas City, Kansas

1. First Modification to Agreement and Covenant Not to Sue (Proposed)

2. 1995 PPA Appendices B and C (proposed to be replaced)
#### In the Matter of Route 22 Properties, L.P., Respondent, v Town Board of the Town of Southeast et al., Appellants.

[767 NYS2d 813]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Southeast dated October 18, 2001, which denied the petitioner’s application to install a certain sign on its premises, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated August 20, 2002, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner applied for, and received, a special use permit to build a car wash and oil change facility on Route 22 in the Town of Southeast, subject to certain conditions, including that the design for its outdoor sign be approved by the Town Board of the Town of Southeast. After several meetings between the petitioner and the Town Board to discuss the proposed design, the Town Board rejected the proposed design by a vote of three to two. The petitioner commenced this proceeding to review the Town Board’s decision and to direct the Town’s Building Inspector to issue a permit for the construction and installation of the sign. The Supreme Court granted the petition. We affirm.

Assuming that the Town Board had the authority to review the aesthetics of the sign, the evidence in the record reveals that its decision to deny the application on the grounds that the sign was ugly or might be offensive to members of the community was arbitrary and capricious, as it was not supported by substantial evidence *(see Matter of Retail Prop. Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*98 NY2d 190, 195-196 [2002]; *Matter of Twin County Recycling Corp. v Yevoli,*90 NY2d 1000 [1997]; *Matter of C.B.H. Props, v Rose,*205 AD2d 686 [1994]; *Matter of McDonald’s Serv. Sta. v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Garden City,*282 AD2d 604 [2001]). The Town Board improperly relied on its own collective ability to gauge the feelings of the community without obtaining any input from the community and without presenting any evidence that the sign would be out of character with the surrounding area *(see Matter of Cromwell v Ferrier,*19 NY2d 263, 272 [1967]; *Matter of Society for Ethical Culture in City of N.Y. v Spatt,*51 NY2d 449, 454 [1980]; *Matter of De Sena v Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Hempstead,*45 NY2d 105, 109; *Sackson v Zimmerman,*103 *450AD2d 843, 844 [1984]; *Matter of Triangle Inn v Lo Grande,*124 AD2d 737 [1986]; *cf. Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304, 308 [2002]).

The parties’ remaining contentions either are academic or without merit. Smith, J.P., McGinity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 1,406 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 16,074 | 4,197  | 20,958 | 12,401 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-806.

#### UnitedHealthcare Insurance Co. *v.*Access Mediquip L. L. C.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-505.

#### Stair *v.*Clerk, Circuit Court of Michigan, 13th Circuit, et al.

Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>


Financial Data Schedule

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
the Statement of Financial Condition for Mineral Mountain Mining & 
Milling Company at June 30, 1998, the Statements of Income for the 
three month period ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                             15,570
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   16,570
<PP&E>                             53,808
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     70,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 140
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          493,880
<OTHER-SE>                       (423,642)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       70,238
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      477
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    2,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,575)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,575)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,575)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0





        





</TABLE>
#### Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers, Matter of, v New York State Health Ins. Plan

3d Dept: 140 AD3d 1329

denied
No. 11-10362.

#### Millbrook *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 968.] Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.