alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Lithuania (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6.25   | --     | 11.32  | 5.23   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 102 (Thursday, May 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 29253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-14147]



[[Page 29253]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Polar Programs; Committee of Visitors; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (1130).
    Date and Time: June 16, 17, and 18, 1998-8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. 
each day.
    Place: Rm. 320, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Va.
    Type of Meeting: Open
    Contact Person: Mr. Dwight D. Fisher, Deputy Head, Polar 
Research Support Section, Office of Polar Programs, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 306-1032.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including program evaluation and GPRA assessments, of the 
Polar Research Support Section, Office of Polar Programs.
    Agenda: To assess the results of NSF program investments in the 
Polar Research Support Section. This shall involve a discussion and 
review of results focused on NSF and grantee outputs and related 
outcomes achieved or realized in providing support to research in 
Antarctica during the preceding three fiscal years. These results 
may be based on NSF contracts, interagency agreements, or other 
investments made in earlier years.

    Dated: May 22, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-14147 Filed 5-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Hazel M. Buck, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Erwin C. Buck, Deceased, and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Katrina M. Buck, and Others, Infants, Appel*1471lant, v Volunteer Ambulance Corps of Bath, New York, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 3.)

[769 NYS2d 762]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Steuben County (Latham, J.), entered December 14, 2001, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to reargue the motion of defendants Volunteer Ambulance Corps of Bath, New York, Inc. and James Harvey, individually and as an officer, servant and agent of Volunteer Ambulance Corps of Bath, New York, Inc., for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City,*167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland ((Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet))
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Finland ((Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet))
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 10.68  | 10.27  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1632

To extend the effectiveness of an exemption from the requirements of the

Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. FORD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To extend the effectiveness of an exemption from the requirements of the Depository Institution Management Interlocks Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION MANAGEMENT

4 INTERLOCKS EXEMPTION.

5 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 206 of the Depository In6 stitution Management Interlocks Act (12 U.S.C. 3205) is

7 amended—
2

•S 1632 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for a period

2 of 15 years after the date of enactment of this title’’;

3 and

4 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘This sub5 section shall expire 15 years after the date of enact6 ment of this title.’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 subsection (a) shall be effective on November 1, 1993.

Æ
2016-1567.

#### Thyroff v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 15AP-1043, 2016-Ohio-5715.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          I, Charles O. Dunn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Mississippi Chemical Corporation (the "Company") hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (the "Act"), that based on my knowledge:

          1.          The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), dated November 19, 2002, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated November 19, 2002
# L_2010196EN.01002301.xml

| 28.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/23

---

REGULATION (EU) No 674/2010 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 23 July 2010

amending Regulation (EC) No 63/2002 (ECB/2001/18) concerning statistics on interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions to deposits and loans vis-à-vis households and non-financial corporations

(ECB/2010/7)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2533/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank (1), and in particular to Articles 5(1) and 6(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The quality of the minimum national sample size determined by the defined criteria has to be further assessed and therefore an extension of the relevant transitional period is needed to study this matter. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The quality of the minimum national sample size determined by the defined criteria has to be further assessed and therefore an extension of the relevant transitional period is needed to study this matter.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 63/2002 of the European Central Bank of 20 December 2001 concerning statistics on interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions to deposits and loans vis-à-vis households and non-financial corporations (ECB/2001/18) (2) should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 63/2002 of the European Central Bank of 20 December 2001 concerning statistics on interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions to deposits and loans vis-à-vis households and non-financial corporations (ECB/2001/18) (2) should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The introductory sentence of the first paragraph of Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 63/2002 (ECB/2001/18) is replaced by the following:

‘Until and including the reference month of December 2013, paragraph 10 of Annex I reads as follows:’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 23 July 2010.

For the Governing Council of the ECB

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 27.11.1998, p. 8.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 10, 12.1.2002, p. 24.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
            --------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Directors
eResearchTechnology, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-3 (No. 333-88361) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-61954, 333-26471, 333-80121 and 333-107272) of eResearchTechnology, Inc. of
our reports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of eResearchTechnology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004
annual report on Form 10-K of eResearchTechnology, Inc.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2005
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Italy (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Italy (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb   | Mar   | Apr   | May   | Jun   | Jul   | Aug   | Sep   | Oct | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | -----
|2020                                                                                                                              |       |       |       | 3,135 |       | 6,610 |       |       |       |     | 3,083 |      
|2021                                                                                                                              |       |       |       |       |       |       |       | 3,401 |       |     |       |      
|2022                                                                                                                              |       |       | 3,702 | 3,426 | 7,408 | 3,462 |       | 3,678 | 3,682 |     |       | 3,712
|2023                                                                                                                              |       | 3,275 | 3,517 | 3,362 |       |       | 6,839 |       |       |     |       | 3,851
|2024                                                                                                                              | 6,886 |       |       | 3,447 |       |       |       |       |       |     |       |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Nice Systems Ltd











Exhibit 10.1  



CONSENT OF REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



        We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 333-11842, 333-9352, 333-11154, 333-13686, 333-111112 and 333-111113)
and on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-12996, 333-12350, 333-109766 and 333-127883) of our
report dated February 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
NICE-Systems Ltd. included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2005. 



	Tel-Aviv, Israel
May 17, 2006		



/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
—————————————————

KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
No. 12-7583.

#### Latham *v.*Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska, et al.

Ct. App. Alaska. Certiorari denied.
# L_2010335EN.01003201.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/32

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1215/2010

of 17 December 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Montoro-Adamuz (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Montoro-Adamuz’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Montoro-Adamuz’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 125, 13.5.2010, p. 19.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.)

SPAIN

Montoro-Adamuz (PDO)

---
# L_2010293EN.01007201.xml

| 11.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 293/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 293/72

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 37/2010 of 22 December 2009 on pharmacologically active substances and their classification regarding maximum residue limits in foodstuffs of animal origin

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 15 of 20 January 2010
  )

On page 52, in the sixth column of the entry for Oxytetracycline:

for:

‘MRLs for fat, liver and kidney do not apply to fin fish.’,

read:

‘MRLs for liver and kidney do not apply to fin fish.’.

---
#### IDT Corporation, Appellant, v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. et al., Respondents.

[50 NYS3d 322]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. *485Oing, J.), entered July 17, 2015, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the remaining sixth and seventh causes of action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This is a dispute between IDT Corporation and its former investment banker, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. (together Morgan Stanley), in which IDT claims that Morgan Stanley induced another of its clients, Telefónica Internacional, S.A. (Telefónica) to breach a contract with IDT. Plaintiff’s remaining causes of action for fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment allege that in response to a subpoena issued in an arbitration proceeding between IDT and Telefónica, Morgan Stanley failed to produce key documents in its possession, and affirmatively represented that such evidence did not exist. IDT claims that had the documents, which were subsequently produced in the instant action, and which arguably show that Morgan Stanley induced or advised Telefónica to breach its contract with IDT, been produced in response to the subpoena in the arbitration proceeding, the arbitration panel would have found that the breach occurred in June 2000 rather than in October 2000, which would have resulted in IDT obtaining a much larger recovery in the arbitration proceeding.

The motion court dismissed these claims, holding that Morgan Stanley did not make a misrepresentation to IDT with respect to its document production, and even if it did, IDT cannot demonstrate that it actually and reasonably relied on Morgan Stanley’s misrepresentation. We agree.

Moreover, even if the arbitration panel had been presented with the newly-produced documents, and found that they established that Telefónica, as a result of Morgan Stanley’s inducement, had an intent, at a June 2000 meeting, to breach its agreement with IDT and replace it with a new partner, this would not have altered the panel’s factual finding that at that June 2000 meeting, Telefónica informed IDT of its need to renegotiate the terms of the agreement, but did not give IDT the type of “take it or leave it” ultimatum that could constitute an anticipatory repudiation under the applicable Florida law (see *Mori v Matsushita Elec. Corp. of Am.,*380 So 2d 461, 463 [Fla Dist Ct App 1980] [prospective breach of contract occurs when there is an absolute repudiation by one of the parties prior to the time when performance is due that distinct and unequivocal], *cert denied*389 So 2d 1112 [Fla 1980]).

Concur— Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
#### Alintoff, Matter of, v Alintoff

2d Dept: 141 AD3d 518

denied
No. 12-6670.

#### Ashmore *v.*Ashmore et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.