alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11379

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDREW BRAVO JIMENEZ, 

a.k.a. DROOPY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00045-CAR-CHW-4

USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11379

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John Jay McArthur, appointed counsel for Andrew 

Bravo-Jimenez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent 

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jimenez’s 

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 22-11379 Document: 31-1 Date Filed: 11/02/2023 Page: 2 of 2
No. 12-695.

#### Bench Billboard Co. *v.*City of Toledo, Ohio.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 6**  **873**

KENNETH H. NEWKIRK ,
P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LOUIS LERNER, Judge, Circuit Court; ANTON BELL, District Attorney; GEORGE ROGERS, Attorney, Stand By; LINDA SMITH, Clerk of Circuit Court; CHARLES HADEN, Appeal Lawyer; RODNEY, Detective, Hampton Police Department; ASHLEY KELLY, Daily Press Writer; MONAE DEBRA WATERS

- OWENS; THOMAS SHERRAD KEARNEY ,
Defendants

- Appellee s .

Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , Magistrate Judge. ( 3 :1 2

- cv
- 00 410

- HEH )

Submitted : August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth H. Newkirk , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth H. Newkirk seeks to appeal the magistrate
judge’s order directing him to particularize his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2 006) complaint . This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 );
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. ,
337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Newkirk seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal conten tions are adequately prese nted in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Clyvia Inc. - Exhibit 10.12






HII GmbH 
Postfach 12 60 
65797 Bad Soden/ Ts.

 

Wegberg, May 2, 2006

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

As you may know, our parent company is located in the United
States. We have been advised by our parent company that the countries Iran,
Iraq, Syria and Libya are currently under embargo, i.e. American companies are
prohibited from exporting to those countries.

Therefore we ask for your understanding that as long as these
countries are under embargo for American companies, we are unable to export to
them, until such embargo is lifted. 

Yours truly

Clyvia Technology GmbH

 

	  Manfred Sappok 	    Dieter Wagels 
	Managing Director 	Managing Director
No. 12-8227.

#### Thomas *v.*Romanowski, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb   | Mar | Apr | May  | Jun | Jul  | Aug   | Sep   | Oct   | Nov  | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ---- | -----
|2021                                                                                                                              |      |       |     |     |      |     |      |       | W     | W     | W    | W    
|2022                                                                                                                              |      | 10.64 |     |     |      |     |      | 13.54 | 12.22 | 11.36 | 9.21 | 11.16
|2023                                                                                                                              | 6.96 |       |     |     |      |     | 5.95 | 5.53  | 11.16 |       |      |      
|2024                                                                                                                              |      |       |     |     | 6.09 |     |      |       |       |       |      |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


TSI Soccer Corporation
Durham, North Carolina

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of dELiA*s Inc.:

      (i)   Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-43665),

      (ii)  Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-42135) and

      (iii) Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-22449)

of our report dated March 18, 1998, relating to the financial statements of TSI
Soccer Corporation, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of dELiA*s Inc.
for the year ended January 31, 1998.


High Point, North Carolina
April 30, 1998                                                  BDO Seidman, LLP
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K/A of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph K. Jachinowski, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMPAC Medical Systems, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |                                                                                   
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|October 29, 2004 |  | /s/ JOSEPH K. JACHINOWSKI                                                         
|                 |  | Joseph K. Jachinowski Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### HENRY HOLLAND v. TIMOTHY D. SHEEHAN.1

January 15, 1909.

Nos. 16,029—(267).

Charge to Jury — New Trial.

Examination of the record in this case discloses no reversible errors.

Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover possession of plaintiff’s law library and office furniture or $1,500, the value thereof. Defendant’s answer denied that plaintiff had any interest, either as owner or otherwise, in the property, admitted that defendant in 1905 executed a chattel mortgage and note for $1,000 upon the property, alleged full payment of the note and denied plaintiff either owned or possessed it. Payment was denied in the reply. On the trial each party produced a note which he claimed was the admitted note. The case was tried before Hallam, J., and a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion to vacate the verdict and for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

Affirmed.

*David F. Peebles, Edward G. Rogers, George Nordlin*and *Franklin S. Griggs,*for appellant.

*Thos. G. Daggett,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 119 N. W. 217.

*546BROWN, X

This action was brought to recover the possession of certain personal property. Defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Plaintiff claimed the right of possession of the property under a chattel mortgage theretofore executed and delivered to him by defendant. Execution of the mortgage was admitted. The defense was that the indebtedness secured thereby had been paid, and this was the sole issue litigated on the trial.

'An examination of the record discloses no reason for disturbing the order appealed from. It is contended that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury upon the question of the burden of proof as to the, payment of the mortgage debt. The court first instructed the jury that the burden was upon plaintiff to show that the debt had not been paid, but subsequently, though after the jury had retired and in the absence of counsel, they were recalled and expressly and clearly charged that the burden was upon defendant to show payment. There was no error in thus correcting the previous erroneous instruction, and the affidavits of the jurors to the effect that they were confused and did not understand the position of the court were inadmissible for the purpose of impeaching their verdict. The modified charge was clear and specific, and no person of ordinary intelligence could have misunderstood the rule intended finally to be laid down for the guidance of the jury.

The motion for a new trial, so far as based upon- the ground of surprise and excusable neglect, was addressed to the discretion of the trial court (Dunnell, Pr. 1013, 1014), in the exercise of which we find no reversible error.

This covers all questions necessary to be considered, and leads to an affirmance.

■Order affirmed.
#### Com. v. Grace10

03/30/2016

413 WAL (2015)

10

. Justice DONOHUE did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Denied

Pa.Super., 134 A.3d 99
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1457 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 463
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1457

                          [Report No. 103-833]

To amend the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act to increase 
authorization for appropriation to compensate Aleut villages for church 
       property lost, damaged, or destroyed during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 1993

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 4, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act to increase 
authorization for appropriation to compensate Aleut villages for church 
       property lost, damaged, or destroyed during World War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Subsection (d) of section 205 of the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands 
Restitution Act (Public Law 100-383) is amended by striking 
``$1,400,000'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``$4,700,000''.

            Passed the Senate November 20 (legislative day, November 
      2), 1993.

            Attest:

                                             WALTER J. STEWART,

                                                             Secretary.

                                                 Union Calendar No. 463

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1457

                          [Report No. 103-833]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act to increase 
authorization for appropriation to compensate Aleut villages for church 
       property lost, damaged, or destroyed during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 4, 1994

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
No. 12-7358.

#### Tucker *v.*Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-4.68



 Exhibit 4.68 
 (English Translation) 
 Supplementary Agreement to Software License Agreement

 This Supplementary Agreement to Software License Agreement (the “Supplementary Agreement”) is entered into by
and among the following parties on January 30, 2011 in Beijing: 
  

			
	 Party A:
	  	Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	 Address:
	  	Baidu Campus, No. 10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, The People’s Republic of China
	 Party B:
	  	Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.
	 Address:
	  	2/F, Baidu Campus, No. 10 Shangdi 10th Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, The People’s Republic of China

 WHEREAS: 
 The parties entered into the Software License Agreement on March 22, 2005 in Beijing. Pursuant to Section 2 of the Software License Agreement, Party B agreed to pay Party A the software license
fees (the “License Fees”). The specified amount of the License Fees and the form of payment are set forth in Appendix 2 to the Software License Agreement. Party A has the right to exempt the obligation of payment or adjust the amount of
the License Fees set forth in Appendix 2 according to the actual circumstances from time to time. 
 Pursuant to Appendix 2 to
the Software License Agreement, Party B should pay for each Software RMB 5,000,000 per year to Party A as License Fees. Party B shall pay the License Fees to the account designated by Party A before December 31 of each year. Party A has
the right to determine whether or not to exempt the Party B’s obligation to pay the License Fees at its discretion. 
 The
parties agree to terminate the provisions above through friendly negotiation. 
 This Supplementary Agreement shall be executed
in two originals and be effective as of the date when the parties sign this Supplementary Agreement and attach the company seals hereto. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto have caused this Supplementary Agreement to be duly executed by its legal representative on its behalf as of the date first set forth above. 

 

			
	 The Licensor:
	  	Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	 Legal Representative:
	  	/s/ Legal Representative
	 Company seal:
	  	(The company seal of Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.)
	 The Licensee:
	  	Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.
	 Legal Representative:
	  	/s/ Legal Representative
	 Company seal:
	  	(The company seal of Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd.)


  
 1
No. 12-7977.

#### Perna *v.*Lattimore, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains third quarter summary financial information extracted
from Mississippi Chemical Corporation fiscal 1997 third quarter Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066895
<NAME> MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,641
<INVENTORY>                                     84,712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,512
<PP&E>                                         659,427
<DEPRECIATION>                                 297,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 849,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,979
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           280
<OTHER-SE>                                     426,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   849,344
<SALES>                                        142,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,786
<CGS>                                          106,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-8116.

#### Le *v.*Long, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
2017-0797.

#### State ex rel. Totten v. Life-Smith.

In Mandamus. On respondent’s motion for judgment on pleadings. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.
No. 12-7824.

#### Birdette *v.*Penn Foster School.

C. A. llth Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 13.26  | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024