alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Sweetgrass, MT Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Sweetgrass, MT Compressed Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 0   | 1  
|2021                                                                                                                              | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 0   | 0   | 1   |     | 0   | 0   |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 1   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Dennis Cardace et al., Appellants, v William G. Fanuzzi et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[768 NYS2d 381]

*558In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated May 6, 2002, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendants William G. Fanuzzi and Carol A. Fanuzzi which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action to recover damages for common-law negligence and alleged violations of Labor Law § 200 and § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An owner of a one- or two-family dwelling is subject to liability under Labor Law § 241 (6) only if he or she directed or controlled the work being performed *(see Garcia v Petrakis,*306 AD2d 315 [2003]; *Tilton v Gould,*303 AD2d 491 [2003]; *Duarte v East Hills Constr. Corp.,*274 AD2d 493, 494 [2000]; *Kolakowski v Feeney,*204 AD2d 693 [1994]). The phrase “direct or control” is construed strictly and refers to the situation where “the owner supervises the method and manner of the work” *(Rimoldi v Schanzer,*147 AD2d 541, 545 [1989]; *see Duda v Rouse Constr. Corp.,*32 NY2d 405, 409 [1973]).

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the defendant homeowners established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action insofar as asserted against them, and the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Garcia v Petrakis, supra*at 316; *Duarte v East Hills Constr. Corp., supra; Stamboulis v Stefatos,*256 AD2d 328, 329 [1998]).

Similarly, the defendant homeowners were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the common-law negligence and Labor Law § 200 causes of action since they established that they neither controlled nor supervised the injured plaintiff’s work, or had actual or constructive notice of any defective condition *(see Garcia v Petrakis, supra*at 316; *Duarte v East Hills Constr. Corp., supra*at 495). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Notice Regarding the Extension of the Expiration



 Exhibit 4.1 
 NOTICE OF WARRANT EXTENSION 
 March 28, 2012 

Reference is made to the Omeros Corporation Common Stock Purchase Warrant
No.             (the “Warrant”) issued in the name of             (“Registered Holder”). The Warrant entitles
Registered Holder to purchase up to         shares of Common Stock of Omeros Corporation (the “Company”) at a purchase price of $12.25 per share. 

Pursuant to Section 6 of the Warrant, the Warrant automatically terminates on March 29, 2012 (the “Expiration Date”).
Notice is hereby given to the Registered Holder that the Board of Directors of the Company has extended the Expiration Date by one year to March 29, 2013. 
 Except for the extension of the Expiration Date described herein, the terms and conditions of the Warrant shall not be amended, waived or otherwise modified in any respect by this Notice. 

 

			
	OMEROS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Gregory A. Demopulos, M.D.
		 	Chairman & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1712 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1712

 Entitled the ``Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse Act''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 19 (legislative day, November 2), 1993

Mr. Bond (for himself and Mr. Danforth) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Entitled the ``Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Courthouse located at Ninth and Locust Streets in 
Kansas City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ``Charles 
Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles Evans Whittaker 
United States Courthouse''.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May   | Jun   | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 3,581 | 2,541 |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 3,277 | 2,595 |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Michigan Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Michigan Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 29.6  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 30.1   | 31.7   | 31.2   | 31.4   | 34.3   | 33.6   | 33.1   | 36.3   | 40.3   | 43.4  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 41.2   | 36.6   | 37.1   | 35.8   | 34.4   | 34.6   | 36.0   | 37.5   | 36.4   | 40.1  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 44.2   | 45.9   | 49.0   | 46.8   | 44.8   | 44.4   | 45.0   | 43.8   | 42.8   | 41.8  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 42.1   | 41.8   | 38.0   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan    | Feb    | Mar    | Apr    | May    | Jun    | Jul    | Aug    | Sep    | Oct    | Nov    | Dec   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2022                                                                                                                              | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 7,112 
|2023                                                                                                                              | 14,314 | 8,229  | 24,841 | 18,546 | 16,002 | 15,769 | 17,245 | 20,709 | 17,228 | 17,901 | 14,382 | 19,439
|2024                                                                                                                              | 17,371 | 16,715 | 17,060 | 21,479 | 26,177 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
1 

### NUMBER 13
- 12
- 00 119
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

LA JOYA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT , Appellant,

v.
BIO
- TECH SOLUTIONS, INC. AND COMMERCIAL ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC. , Appellee s
.

On Appeal from the 2 7 5 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, La Joya Independent School District , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number2

C

- 2045

- 05

- E

. On March 26, 2012, t h e appeal was abated to allow the parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations. This appeal is hereb y REINSTATED. The parties have filed a joint motion to dis miss the appeal on grounds the parties have settled and compromised their differences. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal with prejudice

. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to
dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE

. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the partie s’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue
forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 26th day of July , 20 1 2

.
No. 12-5309.

#### Lewis *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12999]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada 
Test Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada Test Site.

DATES: Wednesday, June 3, 1998: 5:30 p.m.--9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Support Facility, Great 
Basin Room, 232 Energy Way, North Las Vegas, Nevada.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Rohrer, U.S. Department of 
Energy, Office of Environmental Management, P.O. Box 98518, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89193-8513, phone: 702-295-0197.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Advisory Board is to make recommendations to DOE and its regulators in 
the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda

5:30 p.m.  Call to Order
5:40 p.m.  Presentations
7:00 p.m.  Public Comment/Questions
7:30 p.m.  Break
7:45 p.m.  Review Action Items
8:00 p.m.  Approve Meeting Minutes
8:10 p.m.  Committee Reports
8:45 p.m.  Public Comment
9:00 p.m.  Adjourn

    Copies of the final agenda will be available at the meeting.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Kevin Rohrer, at the telephone number 
listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and 
reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the 
agenda. The Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Kevin Rohrer at 
the address listed above.

    Issued at Washington, DC on May 11, 1998.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12999 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
OFFICIAL NO IICE FROM COURT OF.CRIM[NAI A^»$;qE#EXAS A . ~j& ' .«_

TATE OF TEiUW© - -.lis^Saffi S m.':vsSjaaSs&iaSis ;-x::* V <.*CV* ~~"* IfTbflft^^i^^^ R? t3 'Mi&U&MKittPBZezs&r RTNCV BOWES 'TM"'"* PENALTY FOrti/^ . ^^^^ 02 1R $ M 9R6

.._.--.._ PRIVATE USE / BiKSlKl 0006557458 JAN 13 2015

1////U10 -, , Fa^^gj^eg MAILED FROM ZIPr.r>0P 7R701

AUBREY, DEMETRIUS PAUL vfr. Ct. NqT549622-A WR-82,684-01

On this day, the application for 1f?07 Writ of Habeas Corpus has been received

and presented to the Court. * .*..

" '" '-^ Abel Acosta, Clerk

1EBN1

DEMETRIUS PAUL AUBREY

I-TDC# 547922

/'
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------

The following companies are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant:

         o        NV Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation

         o        Impact Multimedia, Inc., a Nevada corporation

         o        NV Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation

         o        Infinity Vision Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation

         o        Siliwood Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation

         o        Intelecon Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation

         o        3D2Net.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *result of operations of the
Trust.

Date: November 9, 2004                 Marcia Markowski
     ---------------------             -----------------------

                                       Marcia Markowski
                                       Trust officer of The Corporate
                                       Trustee

* The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in financial
statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The Trust is required
to distribute all funds received after payment of expenses. Accordingly, the
Trust has not prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
No. 12-264.

#### McFatridge *v.*Whitlock et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.