alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Mediscience
Technology Corp., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31,
2004 (the "Report"), I, Peter Katevatis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ Peter Katevatis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Peter Katevatis
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            (Chief Accounting Officer)
Date: July 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1**Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Global EmploymentHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof: (a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 30, 2007filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: April 15, 2008 By:  /s/ Howard Brill    Howard Brill    Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)      Date: April 15, 2008 By:  /s/ Dan Hollenbach    Dan Hollenbach    Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
---

Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard W. McCullough

April 28, 2009Richard W. McCulloughChairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President
Petroleum Development Corporation
Managing General Partner




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Calendar No. 352

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1314

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse located

McMahon Federal Building’’.in Bridgeport, Connecticut as the ‘‘Brien

JANUARY 28 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 352

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1314

To designate the United States Courthouse located in Bridgeport, Connecticut

as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

JANUARY 28 (legislative day, JANUARY 25), 1994

Reported by Mr. BAUCUS, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the United States Courthouse located in

Bridgeport, Connecticut as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the United States Courthouse located at 915 Lafay4 ette Boulevard in Bridgeport, Connecticut shall be des5 ignated as the ‘‘Brien McMahon Federal Building’’. Any

6 reference in a law, regulation, map, document, record, or
2

•S 1314 RS

1 other paper of the United States to that building shall

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Brien McMahon Fed3 eral Building.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sean Ryan Bree

, * From the 220th District Court

of Comanche County

Trial Court No. CR

- 03933

.

Vs. No. 11

- 16

- 00217

- CR * July 19 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, J.

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

s itting by assignment )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error

in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, we modify

the judgment to reflect that the amount of court costs is reduced from $278 to $249. A s

modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1313]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Summary of Precedent Opinions of the General Counsel; Correction

    In a notice document published in the Federal Register on December 
1, 1997 (62 FR 63603), the VA published a summary of precedent opinions 
of the General Counsel. The document of December 1, failed to include 
an effective date for VAOPGCPREC 28-97. In a correction document 
published in the Federal Register on December 9, 1997 (62 FR 64910), 
the effective date for VAOPGCPREC 28-97 was incorrectly stated to be 
July 24, 1993. The correct effective date is July 24, 1997.
    Accordingly, in correction of notice document 97-31329 appearing on 
page 64910, in the issue of Tuesday, December 9, 1997, the effective 
date is corrected to read ``Effective Date: July 24, 1997''.

    Approved: January 12, 1998.
Thomas O. Gessel,
Director, Office of Regulations Management.
[FR Doc. 98-1313 Filed 1-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



|I, Anthony DiPaolo, Chief Financial Officer of Incentra Solutions, Inc., certify that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|1.                                                                                    
|                                                                                      
|2.                                                                                    
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|3.                                                                                    
|                                                                                      
|4.                                                                                    
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|5.                                                                                    
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      

|Date: April 2, 2007 |  | By: | /s/ Anthony DiPaolo
|------------------- |  | --- | -------------------
|                    |  |     |                    
|                    |  |     |                    

---
|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                                  
|Pennsylvania Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Sectors by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                                                  
|Pennsylvania Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Sectors by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 15.48  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 11.29  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 24


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Getty Petroleum Marketing Inc. on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-23375 and
333-23379) of our reports dated March 12, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Getty
Petroleum Marketing Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 1998 and 1997 and
for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 1998 which reports
have been included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
New York, New York,
March 12, 1998



<PAGE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUSSELL D. ROSCO; BONNIE R. 

ROSCO, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 v. 

TRANS UNION LLC; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-35484 

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00086-RMP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Russell D. Rosco and Bonnie R. Rosco appeal pro se from the district 

court’s judgment awarding attorney’s fees as a sanction under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for 

an abuse of discretion Rule 11 sanctions. Holgate v. Baldwin, 425 F.3d 671, 675 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 13 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 18-35484 

(9th Cir. 2005). We affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding attorney’s fees as 

a sanction against plaintiffs or in its determination of the amount of the award. See 

id. at 675-76 (describing grounds for Rule 11 sanctions and explaining that the 

district court did not abuse its discretion unless it based its decision on an 

erroneous view of the law or a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence); 

Hudson v. Moore Bus. Forms, Inc., 836 F.2d 1156, 1163 (9th Cir. 1987) (district 

court is entitled to broad discretion in setting the amount of a fee award). 

We do not consider plaintiffs’ contentions regarding the district court’s July 

10, 2017 order dismissing the complaint because the notice of appeal is untimely 

as to that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (notice of appeal must be filed 

within 30 days after entry of judgment or order appealed from); StephanieCardona LLC v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., 476 F.3d 701, 703 (9th Cir. 

2007) (“[I]f the district court does not set forth the judgment on a separate 

document, an appealable final order is considered entered when 150 days have run 

from the time the final order is docketed.”). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 15**

**LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION**

November 7, 2006 

The Midland Company 

7000 Midland Boulevard 

Cincinnati, Ohio 

We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information ofThe Midland Company and subsidiaries for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated November 7, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine month period endedSeptember 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-40560, 333-101390, and 333-133596 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-64821, 333-109867, 333-115355, 333-115354, and 333-128492 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Cincinnati, Ohio
No. 12-5435.

#### Milovanovic et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

April 28, 2009Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial Officer
Petroleum Development Corporation
Managing General Partner




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

I.L., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 395

[ February 13, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Yael Gamm , Judge; L.T. Case No. 18

- 000041

- DL

- 00C

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

L EVINE , C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of Rudolph T., Also Known as Rudolph T., Jr. Gloria D’Amico, Appellant; Barbara Donlon et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 661]

— In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the property of Rudolph T., also known as Rudolph T., Jr., an alleged incapacitated person, the appeal is from an amended order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), dated July 24, 2002, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted the petition and appointed a guardian for the property of Rudolph T., also known as Rudolph T., Jr.

Ordered that the amended order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that Rudolph T., also known as Rudolph T., Jr., the person alleged to be incapacitated, is likely to suffer harm because he is unable to provide for the management of his property and cannot adequately understand and appreciate the nature and consequences of such inability. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly appointed a guardian of the property *(see*Mental Hygiene Law § 81.02 [b]; *Matter of James M.,*275 AD2d 324 [2000]; *Matter of Mary S.,*234 AD2d 300 [1996]; *Matter of Harriet R.,*224 AD2d 625 [1996]; *cf. Matter of Maher,*207 AD2d 133, 139-140 [1994]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.44   | 0.20   | 0.15   | 0.08   | 0.71   | 0.57   | 0.57  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.57   | 0.52   | 0.52   | 0.52   | 0.52   | 0.67   | 0.47   | 0.36   | 0.32   | 0.29  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.37   | 0.64   | 0.64   | 0.63   | 1.07   | 0.76   | 0.35   | 0.18   | 0.16   | 0.17  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.14   | 0.14   | 0.15   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 1, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131475 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. SUZANNE VERBRUGGHE, as Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Justices Estate of George Verbrugghe, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 131475 COA: 263686 Macomb CC: 04-004423-NH SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL – MACOMB COUNTY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

ARSENIO V. DeLEON, M.D., and MARIUS LAURINAITIS, M.D., Defendants-Appellees,

and

JAVED ZIA, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the
case of Washington v Sinai Hospital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisi on in that case may re solve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l1025 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 1, 2006

Clerk