UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

 OFFICE OF HEARINGS

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,

 COMPLAINANT,

VS. CASE NO. FAA-2014-1119

SELECT AVIATION SERVICES

 RESPONDENT.

_____________________________________________________

 TELECONFERENCE HEARING BEFORE

 THE HONORABLE J.E. SULLIVAN

 TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 2015

 1:34 P.M.

 HISTORIC JORDAN SPRINGS

 1160 JORDAN SPRINGS ROAD

 STEPHENSON, VIRGINIA 22656
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 2

1 APPEARANCES

2 ON BEHALF OF THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION:

3 ROBERT SPITZER, ESQUIRE

4 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL COUNSEL,

5 NORTHWEST MOUNTAIN REGION

6 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

7 1601 LIND AVENUE, SOUTHWEST

8 RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057

9 TELEPHONE: 425.227.1417

10 FACSIMILE: 425.227.1007

11 EMAIL: ROBERT.SPITZER@FAA.GOV

12

13

14

15 ALSO PRESENT:

16 SPENCER WILLIAMS, JUDICIAL INTERN

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 3

1 INDEX

2 Page

3

4 (NONE EXAMINED)

5

6

7 EXHIBITS

8 Exhibit Page

9

10 (NONE MARKED)

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 4

1 HEARING

2 TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 2015

3 1:34 P.M.

4 THE COURT: We're on the record in the

5 matter of Select Aviation Services, Inc. This is

6 Docket number FAA-2014-1119. Today is Tuesday, June

7 16, 2015, and the parties have convened for a Rule 16,

8 Litigation Scheduling Conference.

9 The FAA is represented by its attorney of

10 record, Mr. Robert Spitzer. The Respondent, Select

11 Aviation Services, Inc., is not present, and there's

12 no explanation for its absence. I'll note that also

13 present at the Office of Hearing today is an observer

14 by the name of Spencer ... sorry Spencer, I forgot

15 your name.

16 MR. WILLIAMS: Williams.

17 THE COURT: Thank you. I know Spencer's

18 name, but I drew a blank. He has just advised me it's

19 Spencer Williams. He is a law student intern with the

20 Office of Hearings, and again, is sitting in as an

21 observer only. So good afternoon to you all.

22 MR. SPITZER: Good afternoon, Your Honor.

23 THE COURT: Mr. Spitzer, what I'm going to

24 do at this point, is I'm going to do a little bit of

25 history, and then we can talk about the absence of the
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 5

1 Respondent from these proceedings, your Motion for

2 Decision, and other matters.

3 So essentially, as I reviewed the file, it

4 appears that on January 13, 2015, the Respondent,

5 which at that time was represented by its attorney,

6 Mr. David M. Schoeggl, filed a Request for Hearing.

7 Shortly thereafter, on January 22, 2015, the FAA filed

8 its complaint. There has been no response or answer

9 to the complaint, either by Mr. Schoeggl, on behalf of

10 the Respondent, or by the Respondent itself.

11 The Certificate of Service that has been

12 filed in this action by the FAA, has listed a Mr. Fred

13 Hodgdon, H-O-D-G-D-O-N, as an individual recipient on

14 behalf of the Respondent. And I am going to be

15 talking about his name and what part he might play in

16 this, a little later in these proceedings.

17 I'll simply note, however, again, that there

18 was no response or answer filed to the January 22,

19 2015, dated complaint. However, on April 6, 2015,

20 this Court issued an Order, setting a CR-16 Litigation

21 Scheduling Conference, and directing the parties to

22 engage in a Rule 26F Planning Meeting. Shortly

23 thereafter that, on May 21, 2015, Mr. Schoeggl filed a

24 withdrawal notice, indicating that as of May 15, 2015,

25 he withdrew as representative for the Respondent.
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 6

1 In this withdrawal notice, which was one

2 page, he indicated that all future papers and

3 pleadings, "Should be served upon Select Aviation

4 Services, Inc., at their last known address of 1004

5 East Side Highway, P.O. Box 430, Corvallis, MT 59828."

6 MT standing for the State of Montana.

7 Shortly thereafter, on June 10, 2015, the

8 FAA filed a Motion for Decision, in which the FAA

9 seeks a full disponsive relief in this action, on the

10 grounds of a defaulting party.

11 Let's talk a little bit about that for just

12 a moment. Mr. Spitzer, let me ask you first and

13 foremost, who is Fred Hodgdon? Do you know?

14 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, from the informal

15 conference, we believe that he's the CEO of the

16 company, or at least someone with some degree of

17 oversight for the business of the company.

18 THE COURT: And when you say that you

19 believe that, is that because you spoke to him

20 personally, or because Mr. Schoeggl represented that

21 to you?

22 MR. SPITZER: I didn't join the informal

23 conference, so the agency spoke with him personally.

24 THE COURT: Okay. During that informal

25 conference, can you state with confidence that Mr.
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 7

1 Hodgdon identified himself in some way, shape, or

2 form, as the CEO, or having some financial or agent

3 status with the company?

4 MR. SPITZER: Yes, Your Honor, we can state

5 with some confidence that he represented himself as

6 being either president of the company, or in some

7 director position at the company.

8 THE COURT: And when did that informal

9 conference occur?

10 MR. SPITZER: It was November 21, 2013.

11 THE COURT: So approximately a year-and-a12 half ago.

13 MR. SPITZER: Yes, that's correct.

14 THE COURT: Since November 21, 2013, have

15 you had any further communications from Mr. Hodgdon,

16 or was your primary contact with Mr. Schoeggl?

17 MR. SPITZER: All contact was with Mr.

18 Schoeggl.

19 THE COURT: This Court has not been provided

20 with any information about a phone number for either

21 the Respondent, Select Aviation Services, Inc., or Mr.

22 Fred Hodgdon. Do you by any chance, have a phone

23 number for either entity or person?

24 MR. SPITZER: One second, Your Honor. Your

25 Honor, we have the general telephone number, a
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 8

1 business telephone number for Select Aviation, which

2 in 2013, was 406-961-4100.

3 THE COURT: Okay, thank you. Have you had a

4 chance to try and utilize that number in the near

5 past, so that we could be assured that it's a working

6 number?

7 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, I attempted to

8 call that phone number about a week, two weeks ago,

9 and the phone appears to have been disconnected.

10 THE COURT: Do you know, Mr. Spitzer,

11 whether or not this company is still in business, and

12 whether the address that the Court has ... the address

13 of record is still viable?

14 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, we believe the

15 company is currently out of business, although that's

16 strictly from hearing news in the general industry.

17 The letter that we sent on May 27, 2015 to Hodgdon's

18 P.O. Box was accepted, and we received a certified

19 return receipt back.

20 THE COURT: And what letter are you

21 referring to?

22 MR. SPITZER: The letter that ... hold on

23 one second. I believe that this is the renewed Motion

24 for Decision.

25 THE COURT: I can tell you that the letter
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 9

1 that I have, that was sent by you, is dated June 9,

2 2015. I don't have any other letter.

3 MR. SPITZER: Yes, Your Honor, this is the

4 Motion for Decision. It says on the certified return

5 receipt letter.

6 THE COURT: So this is a June 9, 2015,

7 letter that you sent to the Respondent's business, and

8 it has not yet been returned as undeliverable?

9 MR. SPITZER: No, we've had no word yet, on

10 the destiny of that letter.

11 THE COURT: Well, it's still early for the

12 U.S. Post Office to potentially return. That was only

13 one week ago, as of today. But we can talk about that

14 a little bit more in just a moment.

15 So let's talk a little bit about the status

16 of the case. Clearly, there's an absence by the

17 responding party, and the withdrawal motion that I

18 received from Mr. Schoeggl, dated May 15, 2015, and

19 received by this office on May 21, 2015, indicated

20 that Mr. Hodgdon was served by first-class mail. Do

21 you have any objection to the Court accepting the

22 Notice of Withdrawal?

23 MR. SPITZER: None, Your Honor.

24 THE COURT: So noted, and the Notice of

25 Withdrawal is accepted. So then let's talk about the
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 10

1 Motion for Decision. And I'm going to chat with you

2 about it briefly, because I think there's some concern

3 the Court has with it, that might be fixable. And it

4 might behoove your client to consider correcting these

5 things, before the Court is asked to rule upon it.

6 Although, I leave it to you to decide what you want to

7 do.

8 First and foremost, I'm going to turn your

9 attention, if I may, to the Motion for Decision. And

10 the Motion for Decision is a two-page document, if we

11 do not include the Certificate of Service. On the

12 second page of the decision, may I draw your attention

13 to the conclusion and your signature. You have signed

14 this document as of October 13, 2014, which creates, I

15 think, somewhat of a problem for you, Mr. Spitzer.

16 Since most of the allegations that are contained in

17 the document post-date October 13, 2014.

18 MR. SPITZER: Yeah, that appears to be an

19 error, Your Honor.

20 THE COURT: But I'm going to chat a little

21 bit about some other things too. You might also want

22 to take a look at the Certificate of Service that is

23 attached to this particular document, in which there

24 is an assertion, a certification by a staff member of

25 your office, that the document was sent to me. And it
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 11

1 clearly was not. My name is identified, but the

2 address given is your own client's address for the

3 internal FAA hearing docket. And so this Certificate

4 of Service appears to be flawed, because neither the

5 hearing docket, nor my office was properly served by

6 the language of the Certificate of Service.

7 Then let's chat just briefly about the

8 Certificate of Service on the June 9, 2015, letter.

9 There's an attempt, obviously, by your client to try

10 and correct the error that occurred earlier this year,

11 when the motion had never been filed with the Court.

12 And happily, the Court did get a copy of the June 9,

13 2015, letter. I'm not quite sure who faxed it to this

14 office, but I cannot say that the Certificate of

15 Service helps me in that regard. Because again, it

16 notes that I have been served, but the service address

17 and fax number is for your own client hearing docket.

18 And thus we again do not have proof of service,

19 sufficiently on either the Court or the hearing

20 docket.

21 In addition, the address for Mr. Hodgdon is

22 not the complete address that was provided by his

23 withdrawing counsel, in the counsel's letter of

24 withdrawal, dated May 21, 2015. I think there's some

25 real problems there as well. May I continue, or do
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 12

1 you have any questions at this point?

2 MR. SPITZER: No, Your Honor, we will refile

3 the Motion for Decision correctly.

4 THE COURT: Let me talk to you then, a

5 little bit about the motion itself, if I may. In the

6 motion itself, on page one of the motion, you have

7 identified the Complainant as the administrator. And

8 I would respectfully suggest caution in that regard.

9 And the reason I say that is because there is a

10 distinct separation of function at the hearing level,

11 between the administrator and the agency counsel. And

12 typically, according to the regulations, the

13 administrator is not involved and is not the

14 Complainant. Because that way the administrator may

15 serve as the appellate decision-maker, once I issue a

16 dispositive ruling. So if you look at 14CFR, section

17 13.202 and 203, you'll see that ... that separation of

18 power that says the administrator will not be a part

19 of this adjudication. I suspect your staff member is

20 very used to using the administrator as the

21 prosecuting party in other matters, and simply made a

22 mistake. But I would ask you too, to take a look at

23 that, if you would be so kind.

24 MR. SPITZER: Certainly, Your Honor.

25 THE COURT: And then lastly, or I'm hoping
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 13

1 this is lastly. Let me just double check. I think

2 this is last. You had indicated in your motion, and

3 this would be on page one and page two, that both the

4 Respondent attorney and the Respondent lay

5 representative were served on different dates, with

6 the complaint. And then you count your time for

7 service from the date that the complaint was received

8 by the lay representative, which is the date that is

9 farther out in time. And I'm curious as to why. And

10 you don't need to say so now. Why you would not count

11 from the date of service on the attorney? Excuse me.

12 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, the intention

13 there was to give the Respondent every possible

14 advantage, so that it was abundantly clear that time

15 had adequately passed for the filing of the complaint.

16 So that was the intention behind the two separate

17 dates there.

18 THE COURT: And you're welcome to do that.

19 I would also note, however, that the motion that I

20 received, did not have a copy or any proof of the

21 Certificate of Service. So if you were planning to

22 refile the motion, it might be helpful to perfect your

23 record, and show proof of the certified mailing, and

24 its receipt.

25 MR. SPITZER: Certainly, Your Honor.
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 14

1 THE COURT: So I am happy, of course, to

2 give you whatever time you want to refile this motion

3 and correct those errors. Or, if you would like, I

4 would be happy to rule on the motion now.

5 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, we'll correct the

6 errors.

7 THE COURT: Okay. And let me ask you this,

8 Mr. Spitzer, would you like me to reset a Rule 16

9 Conference for a date far, far out? And then give you

10 ample time to file a new or amended Motion for

11 Decision, prior to that time? Or, do you want me to

12 simply conclude the proceeding today? There is no

13 further basis to have a CR16 Conference at this time.

14 And leave it to you to track your own case.

15 MR. SPITZER: Your Honor, I don't think

16 there's any reason to have an additional Rule 16

17 Conference, in light of the fact that the Respondent

18 appears to have disappeared. We'll refile the Motion

19 for Decision within the week, and then hopefully

20 you'll rule positively or in our favor on the Motion

21 for Decision, and we can close the case.

22 THE COURT: I may be issuing an Order to

23 Show Cause, or I may issue a ruling on the motion

24 itself, immediately. It just depends. But I'm

25 usually very proactive, and I will issue a ruling of
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 15

1 some kind, shortly after I receive your amended

2 filing.

3 MR. SPITZER: Certainly, Your Honor.

4 THE COURT: Is there anything else that I

5 can address for your client today?

6 MR. SPITZER: I think that pretty much

7 covers all the questions the administrator had.

8 THE COURT: Okay. Let me ask you this, Mr.

9 Spitzer, since this is the first time that we've had a

10 chance to talk, you are located in Seattle? Where are

11 you located, in Renton?

12 MR. SPITZER: Renton, Washington.

13 THE COURT: And what area do you actually

14 cover? Because typically, Judge Goodwin handles most

15 of the West Coast, although sometimes we have some mix

16 of cases. Where all do you go?

17 MR. SPITZER: Typically, I cover the State

18 of Washington, and a little bit of Idaho.

19 THE COURT: And have you been doing this job

20 for a long period of time?

21 MR. SPITZER: Yes, I've transferred recently

22 to the Northwest Mountain Region, but I've been with

23 the agency, I believe nine years, this year.

24 THE COURT: Where is the Northwest Mountain

25 Region?
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 16

1 MR. SPITZER: We're located in Renton,

2 Washington, and we ...

3 THE COURT: But you just recently came to

4 this particular office?

5 MR. SPITZER: That's correct.

6 THE COURT: From where did you come?

7 MR. SPITZER: From the Eastern Region.

8 THE COURT: And what part of the Eastern

9 Region?

10 MR. SPITZER: Well, the office is in

11 Jamaica, New York, and I handled cases throughout the

12 balance of the region.

13 THE COURT: You moved across the country.

14 MR. SPITZER: That's correct.

15 THE COURT: Quite a large move ... were you

16 familiar with the Western Region before this?

17 MR. SPITZER: The first time I had been out

18 to Seattle, was when I had my job interview out here.

19 THE COURT: This Court lived in Seattle for

20 25 years, and is well familiar with the area.

21 Although I am no longer there, I will wish you every

22 happiness. It's a lovely area in which to live for

23 most people.

24 MR. SPITZER: Thank you, Your Honor. I

25 couldn't agree more.
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 17

1 THE COURT: Well then, with that it appears

2 our business is complete. I wish you good luck in

3 your further representation of your client in this

4 matter. I'll look forward to receiving any further

5 motions that you might have to offer. And we can now

6 go off the record. I wish you all a good day. Thank

7 you.

8 MR. SPITZER: Thank you, Your Honor.

9 THE COURT: Bye-bye.

10 (WHEREUPON, the hearing was concluded at 1:57 p.m.)

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 18

1 STIPULATION

2

3 The foregoing matter was taken on the date, and at

4 the time and place set out on the title page hereof.

5

6 It was requested that the matter be taken by the

7 reporter and that the same be reduced to typewritten

8 form.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
1

2

3

4

6

5

7

11

10

13

12

9

8

14

15

19

18

17

16

20

21

25

24

23

22

CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER AND SECURE ENCRYPTED

 I, Andrea F. Mikus, do hereby certify that the

 foregoing matter was reported by stenographic and/or 

 mechanical means, that same was reduced to written form,

 that the transcript prepared by me or under my direction, 

 is a true and accurate record of same to the best of my 

 This transcript and certificate have been digitally

 the action filed or its outcome.

 knowledge and ability; that there is no relation nor 

 parties hereto, nor financial or otherwise interest in

 employment by any attorney or counsel employed by the

Court Reporter

SIGNATURE AND DELIVERY OF CERTIFIED TRANSCRIPT

 signed and securely delivered through our encryption

 server.

 IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have here unto set my hand 

 this day of , .

Andrea F. Mikus

23RD JUNE 2015
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 20

1

1:34 4:3

1:57 17:10

10 6:7

1004 6:4

13 5:4

10:14 10:17

13.202 12:17

14CFR 12:16

15 5:24 9:18

16 4:2 4:7

4:7 14:8

14:16

2

2013 7:10

7:14 8:2

2014 10:14

10:17

2015 4:2

4:7 5:4 5:7

5:19 5:19

5:23 5:24

6:7 8:17

9:2 9:6

9:18 9:19

11:8

11:13 11:24

203 12:17

21 5:23

7:10 7:14

9:19 11:24

22 5:7 5:18

25 16:20

26F 5:22

27 8:17

4

406-961-

4100 8:2

430 6:5

5

59828 6:5

6

6 5:19

9

9 9:1 9:6

11:8 11:12

A

absence

4:12 4:25

9:16

abundantly

13:14

accepted 8:18

9:25

accepting

9:21

according

12:12

across 16:13

action 5:12

6:9

actually

15:13

addition

11:21

additional

14:16

address 6:4

8:12 8:12

11:2 11:2

11:16 11:21

11:22 15:5

adequately

13:15

adjudication

12:19

administrator

12:7

12:11 12:13

12:14 12:18

12:20 15:7

advantage

13:14

advised 4:18

afternoon

4:21 4:22

agency 6:23

12:11 15:23

agent 7:2

ago 7:12

8:8 9:13

allegations

10:16

am 5:14

14:1 16:21

amended 14:10

15:1

ample 14:10

answer 5:8

5:18

anything 15:4

appears 5:4

8:9 10:18

11:4

14:18 17:1

appellate

12:15

approximately

7:11

April 5:19

area 15:13

16:20 16:22

assertion

10:24

assured 8:5

attached

10:23

attempt 11:9

attempted 8:7

attention

10:9 10:12

attorney

4:9 5:5

13:4 13:11

Aviation

4:5 4:11

6:3 7:21

8:1

B

balance 16:12

basis 14:13

behalf 5:9

5:14

behind 13:16

behoove 10:4

believe

6:15 6:19

8:14 8:23

15:23
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 21

bit 4:24 6:11

9:14 9:15

10:21

12:5 15:18

blank 4:18

Box 6:5 8:18

briefly

10:2 11:7

business 6:17

8:1 8:11

8:15 9:7

17:2

Bye-bye 17:9

C

case 9:16

14:14 14:21

cases 15:16

16:11

Cause 14:23

caution 12:8

CEO 6:15 7:2

Certainly

12:24 13:25

15:3

Certificate

5:11

10:11 10:22

11:3 11:6

11:8

11:14 13:21

certification

10:24

certified

8:18 9:4

13:23

chance 7:22

8:4 15:10

chat 10:1

10:20 11:7

check 13:1

clear 13:14

clearly

9:16 11:1

client 10:4

11:9

11:17

15:5 17:3

client's 11:2

close 14:21

Coast 15:15

communication

s 7:15

company

6:16 6:17

7:3 7:6 7:7

8:11 8:15

Complainant

12:7 12:14

complaint 5:8

5:9 5:19

13:6 13:7

13:15

complete

11:22 17:2

concern 10:2

conclude

14:12

concluded

17:10

conclusion

10:13

conference

4:8 5:21

6:15 6:23

6:25 7:9

14:9

14:13 14:17

confidence

6:25 7:5

consider 10:4

contact

7:16 7:17

contained

10:16

continue

11:25

convened 4:7

copy 11:12

13:20

correct

7:13

11:10

14:3 14:5

16:5 16:14

correcting

10:4

correctly

12:3

Corvallis 6:5

counsel 11:23

12:11

counsel's

11:23

count 13:6

13:10

country 16:13

course 14:1

Court 4:4

4:17 4:23

5:20 6:18

6:24 7:8

7:11 7:14

7:19 7:19

8:3 8:10

8:12 8:20

8:25 9:6

9:11 9:21

9:24 10:3

10:5

10:20 11:11

11:12 11:19

12:4

12:25 13:18

14:1 14:7

14:22

15:4 15:8

15:13 15:19

15:24

16:3 16:6

16:8

16:13 16:15

16:19 16:19

17:1 17:9

cover 15:14

15:17

covers 15:7

CR16 14:13

CR-16 5:20

creates 10:14

curious 13:9

currently

8:15

D

date 13:7

13:8

13:11 14:9
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 22

dated 5:19

9:1 9:18

11:24

dates 13:5

13:17

David 5:6

day 17:6

decide 10:6

decision

5:2 6:8

8:24 9:4

10:1 10:9

10:10 10:12

12:3

14:11 14:19

14:21

decisionmaker 12:15

defaulting

6:10

degree 6:16

depends 14:24

destiny 9:10

different

13:5

directing

5:21

director 7:7

disappeared

14:18

disconnected

8:9

disponsive

6:9

dispositive

12:16

distinct

12:10

docket 4:6

11:3 11:5

11:17 11:20

document

10:10 10:14

10:17 10:23

10:25

double 13:1

draw 10:12

drew 4:18

During 6:24

E

earlier 11:10

early 9:11

East 6:5

Eastern

16:7 16:8

either 5:9

7:6 7:20

7:23 11:19

else 15:4

engage 5:22

entity 7:23

error 10:19

11:10

errors 14:3

14:6

essentially

5:3

Excuse 13:11

explanation

4:12

F

FAA 4:9 5:7

5:12 6:8

6:8 11:3

FAA-2014-1119

4:6

fact 14:17

familiar

16:16 16:20

farther 13:9

favor 14:20

fax 11:17

faxed 11:13

file 5:3

14:10

filed 5:6 5:7

5:12 5:18

5:23 6:8

11:11

filing

13:15 15:2

financial 7:2

first 6:12

10:8 15:9

16:17

first-class

9:20

fixable 10:3

flawed 11:4

foremost 6:13

10:8

forgot 4:14

form 7:2

forward 17:4

Fred 5:12

6:13 7:22

full 6:9

function

12:10

future 6:2

G

general

7:25 8:16

given 11:2

Goodwin 15:14

grounds 6:10

H

half 7:12

handled 16:11

handles 15:14

happily 11:12

happiness

16:22

happy 14:1

14:4

having 7:2

hearing 4:1

4:13 5:6

8:16 11:3

11:5

11:17 11:19

12:10 17:10

Hearings 4:20

helpful 13:22

helps 11:15

he's 6:15

Highway 6:5
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 23

history 4:25

Hodgdon

5:13 6:13

7:1 7:15

7:22 9:20

11:21

H-O-D-G-D-O-N

5:13

Hodgdon's

8:17

hold 8:22

Honor 4:22

6:14 7:4

7:24 7:25

8:7 8:14

9:3 9:23

10:19

12:2

12:24 13:12

13:25

14:5

14:15

15:3

16:24 17:8

hopefully

14:19

hoping 12:25

I

Idaho 15:18

identified

7:1 11:1

12:7

I'll 4:12

5:17 17:4

I'm 4:23 4:24

10:1 10:8

10:20 11:13

12:25

13:9 14:24

immediately

14:24

Inc 4:5

4:11 6:4

7:21

include 10:11

indicated 6:2

9:19 13:2

indicating

5:24

individual

5:13

industry 8:16

informal 6:14

6:22 6:24

7:8

information

7:20

intention

13:12 13:16

intern 4:19

internal 11:3

interview

16:18

involved

12:13

issue 12:15

14:23 14:25

issued 5:20

issuing 14:22

I've 15:21

15:22

J

Jamaica 16:11

January 5:4

5:7 5:18

job 15:19

16:18

join 6:22

Judge 15:14

June 4:2

4:6 6:7 9:1

9:6 11:8

11:12

K

known 6:4

L

language 11:6

large 16:15

last 6:4 13:2

lastly

12:25 13:1

later 5:16

law 4:19

lay 13:4 13:8

least 6:16

leave 10:6

14:14

let's 6:11

9:15 9:25

11:7

letter 8:17

8:20 8:22

8:25 9:2

9:5 9:7

9:10 11:8

11:13 11:23

level 12:10

light 14:17

listed 5:12

Litigation

4:8 5:20

little 4:24

5:16 6:11

9:14 9:15

10:20

12:5 15:18

live 16:22

lived 16:19

located 15:10

15:11 16:1

long 15:20

longer 16:21

lovely 16:22

luck 17:2

M

mail 9:20

mailing 13:23

matter 4:5

17:4

matters 5:2

12:21

may 5:23 5:24

8:17 9:18

9:19 10:9

10:12 11:24

11:25

12:5

12:14 14:22

14:23

Meeting 5:22

member
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 24

10:24 12:19

mistake 12:22

mix 15:15

moment 6:12

9:14

Montana 6:6

motion 5:1

6:8 8:23

9:4 9:17

10:1 10:9

10:10 11:11

12:3 12:5

12:6 12:6

13:2

13:19 13:22

14:2 14:4

14:10 14:18

14:20 14:23

motions 17:5

Mountain

15:22 15:24

move 16:15

moved 16:13

MT 6:5 6:6

N

neither 11:4

news 8:16

nine 15:23

None 9:23

nor 11:5

Northwest

15:22 15:24

note 4:12

5:17 13:19

noted 9:24

notes 11:16

notice 5:24

6:1 9:22

9:24

November 7:10

7:14

O

objection

9:21

observer 4:13

4:21

obviously

11:9

occur 7:9

occurred

11:10

October 10:14

10:17

offer 17:5

office 4:13

4:20 9:12

9:19

10:25

11:5

11:14

16:4 16:10

Okay 6:24 8:3

14:7 15:8

Order 5:20

14:22

oversight

6:17

P

p.m 4:3 17:10

P.O 6:5 8:18

page 6:2

10:12

12:6 13:3

13:3

papers 6:2

particular

10:23 16:4

parties 4:7

5:21

party 6:10

9:17 12:21

passed 13:15

past 8:5

people 16:23

perfect 13:22

period 15:20

person 7:23

personally

6:20 6:23

phone 7:20

7:22 8:8

8:9

planning 5:22

13:21

play 5:15

pleadings 6:3

point 4:24

12:1

position 7:7

positively

14:20

possible

13:13

Post 9:12

post-date

10:17

potentially

9:12

power 12:18

present

4:11 4:13

president 7:6

pretty 15:6

primary 7:16

prior 14:11

proactive

14:25

problem 10:15

problems

11:25

proceeding

14:12

proceedings

5:1 5:16

proof 11:18

13:20 13:23

properly 11:5

prosecuting

12:21

provided 7:19

11:22

Q

questions

12:1 15:7

quite 11:13

16:15

R

real 11:25
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 25

reason 12:9

14:16

receipt

8:19 9:5

13:24

receive 15:1

received 8:18

9:18 9:19

13:7 13:20

receiving

17:4

recently

15:21 16:3

recipient

5:13

record 4:4

4:10 8:13

13:23 17:6

referring

8:21

refile 12:2

13:22

14:2 14:18

regard

11:15 12:8

region

15:22 15:25

16:7 16:9

16:12 16:16

regulations

12:12

relief 6:9

renewed 8:23

Renton

15:11 15:12

16:1

representatio

n 17:3

representativ

e 5:25 13:5

13:8

represented

4:9 5:5

6:20 7:5

Request 5:6

reset 14:8

respectfully

12:8

Respondent

4:10 5:1

5:4 5:10

5:10 5:14

5:25 7:21

13:4 13:4

13:13 14:17

Respondent's

9:7

responding

9:17

response

5:8 5:18

return 8:19

9:4 9:12

returned 9:8

reviewed 5:3

Robert 4:10

rule 4:7 5:22

10:5 14:4

14:8

14:16 14:20

ruling

12:16 14:23

14:25

S

Scheduling

4:8 5:21

Schoeggl

5:6 5:9

5:23 6:20

7:16 7:18

9:18

Seattle 15:10

16:18 16:19

second 7:24

8:23 10:12

section 12:16

seeks 6:9

Select 4:5

4:10 6:3

7:21 8:1

sent 8:17 9:1

9:7 10:25

separate

13:16

separation

12:10 12:17

serve 12:15

served 6:3

9:20 11:5

11:16 13:5

service

5:11

10:11 10:22

11:4 11:6

11:8

11:15 11:16

11:18

13:7

13:11 13:21

Services

4:5 4:11

6:4 7:21

setting 5:20

shape 7:1

shortly 5:7

5:22 6:7

15:1

signature

10:13

signed 10:13

simply 5:17

12:21 14:12

sitting 4:20

someone 6:16

somewhat

10:15

sorry 4:14

Spencer

4:14 4:14

4:19

Spencer's

4:17

Spitzer

4:10 4:22

4:23 6:12

6:14 6:22

7:4 7:10

7:13 7:17

7:24 8:7

8:10 8:14

8:22 9:3

9:9 9:23

10:15 10:18

12:2

12:24 13:12

13:25

14:5 14:8

14:15
FAA vs Select Aviation Serv Hearing June 16, 2015 VR # 2406-1 Page 26

15:3 15:6

15:9

15:12 15:17

15:21

16:1 16:5

16:7

16:10 16:14

16:17 16:24

17:8

spoke 6:19

6:23

staff 10:24

12:19

standing 6:6

state 6:6

6:25 7:4

15:17

status 7:3

9:15

strictly 8:16

student 4:19

sufficiently

11:19

suggest 12:8

sure 11:13

suspect 12:19

T

talk 4:25

6:11 9:13

9:15 9:25

12:4 15:10

talking 5:15

telephone

7:25 8:1

thank 4:17

8:3 16:24

17:6 17:8

thereafter

5:7 5:23

6:7

there's

4:11 9:16

10:2 11:9

11:24 14:16

throughout

16:11

thus 11:18

today 4:6

4:13 9:13

14:12 15:5

track 14:14

transferred

15:21

try 8:4 11:9

Tuesday 4:2

4:6

turn 10:8

two-page

10:10

typically

12:12 15:14

15:17

U

U.S 9:12

undeliverable

9:8

upon 6:3 10:5

usually 14:25

utilize 8:4

V

viable 8:13

W

Washington

15:12 15:18

16:2

week 8:8 9:13

14:19

weeks 8:8

welcome 13:18

we'll 14:5

14:18

We're 4:4

16:1

West 15:15

Western 16:16

we've 9:9

15:9

whatever 14:2

WHEREUPON

17:10

whether

8:11 8:12

Williams 4:16

4:16 4:19

wish 16:21

17:2 17:6

withdrawal

5:24 6:1

9:17 9:22

9:25 11:24

withdrawing

11:23

withdrew 5:25

working 8:5

Y

year-and-a

7:11

yet 9:8 9:9

York 16:11

you'll

12:17 14:20