### 2

In accordance with the new chemical scre en for copper pyrithione ( June 2, 2004 ) and after

review of the ava ilable environmental fate data ( Environmental Fate Science Chapter on Zinc

Pyrithione (Zinc Omadine®) and Proposed Bridging to Copper Pyrithione , J

. Breithaupt,

RASSB/AD, November 17, 2010)

, a full ecotoxicity d ata set for copper pyrithione i s not being

required. The fate and effects data submitted by the registrant for copper pyrithione a re

considered sufficiently similar to the existing data for zinc pyrithione to allow bridging between

t he se two pyrithione compounds.

P redictions of exposure (EECs) for the risk assessment are based on MAM

- PEC, a European

model developed to predict concentrations of antifoulant pesticides in aquatic environments (e. g.,

marinas, harbors, surrounding area s). MAM

- PEC scenarios modeled for copper pyrithione

include inland and coastal marinas and an estuarine harbor. EECs a re calculated for the water

column and sediment within each setting

. RASSB's hazard and risk conclusions are summarized

below and prese nted in more detail in the attached ecological risk assessment

.

Hazard and Risk C onclusions:

• C opper pyrithione is very highly toxic to freshwater and saltwater fish and aquatic

invertebrates and slightly to moderately toxic to terrestrial anim als ; based on acute

toxicity, a precautionary hazards statement is required for aquatic organisms (s ee l abel

requirements below)

• T wo freshwater (inland) and two saltwater (coastal) scenarios were modeled using

exposure predictions from MAM

- PEC. The following LOCs are exceeded for acute risk

to aquatic organisms in habiting the water column:

LOCs exceeded

Scenario Listed spp. 1 

### N on

- listed spp.

Inland Marina: Fish, acute

Aquatic invertebrates, acute N one

Inland Small Marina: Fish, acute

Aquatic invertebrates, acute Fish, acute

Coastal Marina: Aquatic invertebrates, acute N one

Coastal Harbor: None N one

For the freshwater scenarios, 135 listed fish species or populations and more than 100

listed species of aquatic invertebrates ( e. g., clams, snails, crustaceans) are potentially at

risk ( http://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/us

- species.html )

.

1 

### Federally designated as e ndangered or threatened

### 3

For the estuarine/marine scenarios, four listed species are potent ially at risk. These

species include the white abalone ( Haliotis sorenseni ) and black abalone ( H. cracherodii )

in 13 counties off the coast of southern California ; and the elkhorn coral ( Acropora

palmate ) and staghorn coral ( A. cer v icornis ) in coastal Mia mi

- Dade and Monroe counties

in southern Florida and in coastal areas of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands

.

• The chronic LOC is not exceeded for any taxa for any scenario

• The LOC is not exceed for listed and non

- listed aquati c plants for any scenario

• Based on l ow predicted concentrations in sediment after one year in relation to the

sediment

- based toxicity of copper pyrithione to freshwater and marine amphipods,

minimal risks are presumed for exposure to sediment containing copper pyrithione

leach ed from watercraft hulls

• T wo degradates tested are only slightly to practically nontoxic to aquatic plants and

animals

• C opper pyrithione is not presumed to pose risks to terrestrial animals, due to its low

toxi city to birds and mammals and little potential for bioaccumulation

Label requirements:

A ll product labels must have the following ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS statement:

" This pesticide is toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms

. Do not apply directly to water

by cleaning of equipment or disposal of wastes. Do not allow chips and dust generated

during paint removal to enter water

. Do not discharge effluent containing this product

into lakes, streams, ponds, estuaries, oceans, or other waters unless in accordance with

the requirements of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit

and the permitting authorities are notified in writing prior to discharge. Do not discharge

effluent containing this product to sewer systems without pre viously notifying the local

sewage treatment plant authority. For guidance contact your State Water Board or

Regional Office of the EPA."

Required guideline studies :

No additional guideline studies are required at this time. However, when additional information

become s available (see below) to enable a more refined risk assessment for U. S. waters, the

following study may be required:

Fish life cycle (850.1500) ; reserved

### 4

Additional information needed :

A dditional information is needed to better refine the risk assessment for U. S. harbors and

marinas. Such information includes but is not limited to the following:

• D imensions of marinas and harbors

• Number and sizes of watercraft in the facility , including s easonal and geograph ical

variations

• Environmental inputs including tides and currents, water temperature, salinity, pH,

sediment density, and others

### 5 Table of Contents

Memorandum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1

Ecological Hazards Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . 6

Ecological Risk Assessment and Characterization. . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7

Aquatic Exposure Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Aquatic Risk Assessment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 3

Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column, Acute. . . . . . . . . . 1 3

Estuarine/marine Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column, Acute. . . . . 1 4

Aquatic Organi sms Exposed in the Water Column , Chronic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 6

Invertebrates Exposed to Contaminated Sediments, Acute

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 8

Aquatic Plants. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 9

Aquatic Risk Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Terrestrial Risk Characterization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2

Endangered Species Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . 2 2

References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3

A ppendix A: Data Requirements and Available Guideline Ecotoxicity Data for

Copper Pyrithione

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 4

A ppendix B : Copper Pyrithione MAM

- PEC Runs for U. S. Inland and Coastal Marinas

and Harbors and Surrounding Waters

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1

### 6 Ecological Hazard and Envi ronment Risk Assessment

Copper Pyrithione

Copper pyrithione (also referred to as copper omadine) is a new chemical intended for use as an

antifoulant paint on watercraft

. The MUP is COPPER OMADINE POWDER AF ( copper 2

- pyridinethiol

- 1

- oxide, 98%). The en d

- use product is intended for below

- waterline application to

fiberglass, wood and properly primed metal boat hulls and parts in fres h, salt and brackish

waters. It is not for use on aluminum hulls

.

Both a hazards and risk assessment have been conducted

. A risk assessment is required, because

the intended use of copper pyrithione as a n antifoulant coating will result in exposure of aquatic

organisms due to leaching of the active ingredient into the aquatic environment. The hazards

assessment is used to meet current labeling requirements for precautionary statements and to

determine toxicity endpoints for the ecological risk assessment

.

Ecological Hazards Assessment

The toxicity endpoints used in OPP's assessments are obtained from guideline toxicity s tudies

conducted for wildlife, aquatic organisms, and plants (40 CFR §158). Guideline studies are

required to provide acute and reproductive/chronic measures of effect for one or more test

species in several taxonomic groups. Some studies are only requir ed on a case

- by

- case basis,

depending on factors such as use patterns and environmental fate characteristics.

The full complement of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data available for copper pyrithione and

zinc pyrithione and two degradates (pyridine sulf onic acid and pyrithione sulfonic acid) are

presented in Appendix A. The most sensitive species in each taxa / group is used in the

assessment. Those data are tabulated below (Table 1)

. The data characterize copper pyrithione

as being highly to very highl y toxic freshwater and saltwater fish and invertebrates and slightly

to moderately toxic to birds and mammals. A precautionary hazards label statement is required

for aquatic organisms.

Table 1. Ecotoxicity Data Used in the Hazard and Risk Assessment

C ategory/

Species Measurement

e ndpoint Toxicity

endpoint Toxicity

category

Birds:

Northern bobwhite acute LD50 60 mg ai/kg bw moderately toxic

dietary LC50 1063 ppm ai slightly toxic

Mammals:

Laboratory rat acute LD50 6 30 mg ai/kg bw (♂)

460 mg ai/kg bw (♀) slightly to moderately

toxic

Freshwater fish:

### 7

Fathead minnow acute LC50 2.6 μg ai/L very highly toxic

chronic NOEC 0.98 μg ai/L

Freshwater invertebrates:

Waterflea acute EC50 8.2 μg ai/L very highly toxic

chronic NOEC 2.7 μg ai/L

Estuarine/marine fish:

Sheepshead minnow acute LC50 400 μg ai/L highly toxic

chronic NOEC no data

Estuarine/marine invertebrates:

Mysid shrimp acute LC50 4.7 μg ai/L very highly toxic

chronic NOEC 2.2 μg ai/L

A quatic plants:

Duckweed EC50 8.8 μg ai/L n/a

NOEC 4.0 μg ai/L

Freshwater diatom EC50 2.6 μg ai/L n/a

Saltwater diatom EC50 0.65 μg ai/L n/a

Sediment toxicity:

Freshwater amphipod EC50 or LC50 2.1 mg/kg dry wt n/a

Saltwater amphipod EC50 or LC50 <1.08 mg/kg dry wt n/a

The toxicity data for the two degradates tested are presented in Tables 5A, 6A, and 8A in

Appendix A. The degradates are only slightly to practically nontoxic to aquatic organisms

.

Ecological Risk Assessment and Char acterization

Risk assessment and characterization integrates exposure and toxicity information to evaluate the

potential for adverse ecological effects. Risk quotients (RQs) are determined for each taxa or

ecological group by comparing exposure estimates (Estimated Environmental Concentrations,

EECs) to the available acute and chronic ecotoxicity values, where:

RQ = Exposure estimate (EEC) / Toxicity value

RQs are compared to OPP's levels of concern (LOCs). Exceedance of an LOC indicates a

potential for acute or chronic adverse effects on nontarget organisms and identifies a need for

regulatory action to mitigate risk. LOCs currently address the following risk presumptions:

acute: regulatory action may be warranted to reduce or preclude

acute exp osure

acute, listed species: additional regulatory action may be warranted to protect

listed (i.e., endangered or threatened) species

### 8 chronic: regulatory action may be needed to reduce or preclude

chronic exposure

The LOCs for the various risk pres umptions are listed below for terrestrial and aquatic animals

and plants:

Aquatic

Animals Terrestrial

Animals Plants

Acute: 0.5 0.5 1

Acute, listed species: 0.05 0.1 1

Chronic: 1 1 n/a

T he following toxicity endpoints are used as inputs to the RQ method for ex pressing risk :

Aquatic Animals

Acute: Lowest tested EC50 or LC50 for freshwater fish and

invertebrates and estuarine/marine fish and inv ertebrates

Chronic: Lowest NOEC for freshwater fish and invertebrates and

estuarine/marine fish an d invertebrates ( early life

- stage or

full life

- cycle tests )

Terrestrial Animals

Avian acute: Lowest LD50 (single oral dose) and LC50 (subacute

dietary)

Avian chronic: Lowest NOEC (21

- week avian reproduction test)

Mammalian

acute: Lowest LD50 from s ingle oral dose test.

Mammalian

chronic: Lowest NOEC for two

- generation reproduction test

Plants

Terrestrial: Lowest EC25 values from both seedling emergence and

vegetative vigor for both monocots and dicots

Terrestrial

listed: Lowest EC 0 5 or NOEC for both seedling emergence and

vegetative vigor for both monocots and dicots

Aquatic vascular

and algae: Lowest EC50

Aquatic vascular

listed: NOEC or EC05

When available, toxicity measures or other appropriate information from non

- guideline studies

or fr om the open literature also may be used to characterize and refine risk s

.

### 9

OPP generally uses computer simulation models to estimate exposure of aquatic organisms to a n

active ingredient. These models estimate EECs in surface waters and sediment using p roduct

label information (e.g., treatment site, appli cation rate, application method ) and available

environmental

- fate data t o de termine how rapidly the pesticide degrades and it s expected

move ment in environment al compartments

. The model used in the curr ent risk assessment is

described in more detail in the Aquatic Exposure Assessment section.

For aquatic organisms, the following EECs are typically used to calculate the RQ for each taxa:

Fish

Acute:

Chronic: Instantaneous

60

- day average

Invertebrates

Acute:

Chronic: Instantaneous

21

- day average

Plants

Acute:

Chronic: Instantaneous

Not applicable

Aquatic Exposure Assessment

EECs in the water column and sediment are estimated using MAM

- PEC (v. 2.0) 2

, 3



### . The MAM

PEC model was developed by the Ins titute of Environmental Studies/IVM and Delft Hydraulics

for the European Paint Makers Association to p redict environmental c oncentrations of

antifoulant paints/coatings in various marine environments (e.g., marinas, harbor s , s urrounding

waters ) . The model account s for a variety of emission factors (e.g., leaching rate, watercraft

numbers and sizes, residence times, watercraft

- hull underwater surface areas), compound

- related

properties and processes (e.g., Kd, Kow, Koc, volatilization , speciation, hydrolysi s, photolysis,

biodegradation), and environmental properties and processes (e.g. currents, tides, salinity, DOC,

suspended matter load, port dimensions). The default scenarios in MAM

- PEC allow the user to

alter input values for the specific locality being assessed if data are available . For example, the

dimensions of the default marina (see below) can be altered for the known dimensions of a

2 

### v an Hattum B

. , A

. C Baart, and J

. G

. Boon

. 2002

. Computer model to generate predicted

environmental concentrations (PECs) for antifouling products in the marine environment

- 2nd

ed. accompanying the release of Mam

- Pec version 1.4 , IVM Report (E

- 02/04), Institute for

Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

3 

### OECD. 2005. Emission Scenario Document on Antifouling Products

. OECD Environmental

Health and Safety Publications

, OECD S eries on E mission S cenar io D ocuments N o. 1 3

, ENV/JM/MONO(2005)8

, Organisation for Economic Co

- operation and Development , 166 pp.

### 10

specific marina

, or to predict aquatic EECs for marinas of different sizes. The number and sizes

of watercraft als o can be changed

, as well as the percentage of craft treated if actual usage

information is obtained

. With a few modifications (e. g., latitude, water temperature, salinity and

tidal factors), RASSB is using the default scenarios provided by MAM

- PEC for t he current

assessment of copper pyrithione. These scenarios can be further refined when additional

information on the dimensions and physical and chemical properties of U. S. coastal and inland

marina s and harbor s become available

.

The estimated leachi ng rate of c opper pyrithione from painted hulls was determined from two

leaching stud ies conducted by the registrant and submitted to and reviewed by RASSB

. Maximum and average EECs are predicted for the water column and over time in sediment , both

within the marina or harbor and in the surrounding waters

. EECs are generated for the highest

leaching rate s (9. 3 μg/cm 2 

### /day, dark red formulation ; 6.5 μg/cm 2 

### /day, brown formulation ) for all

scenarios. For each scenario, in the absence of any usage information, it is assumed that 100%

of the craft are treated. If usage information becomes available, the scenarios c an be refined to

reflect that information. The EECs generated by MAM

- PEC are used for both acute and chronic

exposure. T he leaching rate varied little over the 45

- day study period in both studies (MRIDs

471077

- 09 and 471077

- 10) as illustrated below

.

The inland (freshwater) and coastal ( saltwater ) marina and harbor scenarios used in this

assessment are briefly described below. Details of the specific runs, including all input values

and predicted water

- column and sediment EECs are provided in Append ix B

. Further

descriptions of the MAM

- PEC model default scenarios are provided in the OECD (2005)

Emission Scenario Document on Antifouling Products

.

### 11

Inland M arina

MAM

- PEC scenario: default estuarine harbor (no tidal factors, minimal salinity)

Dime nsions: 400 x 400 m, 3.5 m deep

No. craft at berth: 299 (10

- 5 0 m in length )

Underwater area of individual craft : 2 2.5 m 2



### See Appendix B 1 a,b for additional specifications on this scenario

Inland Small M arina

MAM

- PEC scen ario: modified default Swiss ma rina sce nario from OECD (2005)

Dimensions: 10 0 x 100 m, 2 m deep

No. craft at berth: 75 ( < 10 m in length)

Underwater area of individual craft : 10 m 2



### See Appendix B2 a,b for additional specifications on this scenario

Coastal M arina

MAM

- PEC scenario: de fault marina

Dimensions: 400 x 400 m, 3.5 m deep

No. craft at berth: 299 (10

- 5 0 m in length )

Underwater area of individual craft : 22.5 m 2



### See Appendix B3 a,b for additional specifications on this scenario

Coastal H arbor

MAM

- PEC scenario: default est uarine harbor

D imensions: 1000 x 5 000 m, 15 m deep

No. craft at berth : 24 ( 50

- 100 m to 250

- 300 m in length)

Underwater area of individual craft : 450 to 14

, 814 m 2



### See Appendix B4 a,b for additional specifications on this scenario

MAM

- PEC predicted EECs in the water column are presented in Table 2 for the inland scenarios

and in Table 3 for the coastal scenarios

. Table 4 presents the MAM

- PEC predicted maximum

sediment concentrations after one year in the marina or harbor and in the surrounding waters

. A verage predicted sediment concentrations did not change after two

, five , and 10 years (see

Appendix B ). These predictions are further discussed in the Aquatic Risk Assessment section

entitled Invertebrates Exposed to Contaminated Sediments, Acute

.

### 12

Table 2. MAM

- PEC Predicted Water

- column EECs for Inland Marinas and Surrounding

Waters

Leaching rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) Marina or Harbor

EEC (μg/L) Surrounding

- water

EEC (μg/L)

max. avg. max. avg.

Inland Marina:

9.3 0.409 0.269 0.024 0.001

6.5 0.286 0.1 88 0.017 <0.001

Inland Small Marina:

9.3 1.560 0.981 0.062 0.006

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.043 0.004

Table 3. MAM

- PEC Predicted Water

- column EECs for Coastal Marinas and Harbors and

Surrounding Waters

Leaching rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) Marina or Harbor

EEC (μg/L) Surrounding

- water

EEC (μg/L)

max. avg. max. avg.

Coastal Marina:

9.3 0.418 0.276 0.024 0.001

6.5 0.286 0.188 0.017 <0.001

Coastal Harbor:

9.3 0.097 0.048 0.016 0.003

6.5 0.068 0.033 0.011 0.002

### 13

Table 4. MAM

- PEC Predicted Maximum Sediment Conce ntrations for Inland and Coastal

Marinas and Harbors

Environment Leaching rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) Max. concentration (μg/g dry wt) after 1 year

marina or harbor surrounding waters

Inland Marina 9.3 4.84E

- 07 2.82E

- 08

6.5 3.38E

- 07 1.97E

- 08

Inland Small Ma rina 9.3 1.84E

- 06 7.34E

- 08

6.5 1.29E

- 06 5.13E

- 08

Coastal Marina 9.3 2.48E

- 06 1.46E

- 07

6.5 1.69E

- 06 9.86E

- 08

Coastal Harbor 9.3 5.72E

- 07 9.34E

- 08

6.5 4.00E

- 07 6.53E

- 08

Aquatic Risk Assessment

Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Wat er Column , Acute

RQs based on acute toxicity to the most sensitive freshwater fish species (fathead minnow) and

invertebrate species (waterflea ) exceed the acute LOC for listed ( e.g., threatened and

endangered) species in the inland marina scenario s, even when RQs are based on average EECs

(Tables 5 and 6). Non

- listed fi sh also are at risk from high exposure in small marinas. No LOC

is exceeded for either fish or aquatic invertebrates in the waters surrounding inland marinas.

Table 5

. Acute Risk Quotien ts for Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the

Water Column of an Inland Marina (400 x 400 m, 3.5 m deep) and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50/EC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inlan d Marina:

Fish 9.3 0.409 0.269

2.6 0.16 * 0.10*

6 .5 0.286 0.188 0.11* 0.07*

Invertebrates 9.3 0.409 0.269

8.2 0.05* 0.03

6 .5 0.286 0.188 0.03 0.02

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.024 0.001 2.6 <0.01 <0.01

### 14

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50/EC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

6 .5 0.017 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01

Invertebra tes 9.3 0.024 0.001

8.2 <0.01 <0.01

6 .5 0.017 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01

* exceeds the LOC for listed species (RQ > 0.05)

Table 6

. Acute Risk Quotients for Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the

Water Column of a n Inland Small Marina (10 0 x 100 m , 2 m deep)

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50/EC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inland Small Marina:

Fish 9.3 1.560 0.981

2.6 0.60** 0.34*

6. 5 1.090 0.686 0.42* 0.26*

Invertebrates 9.3 1.560 0.981

8.2 0.19* 0.12*

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.13* 0.08*

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.062 0.006

2.6 0.02 <0.01

6.5 0.043 0.004 0.02 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.062 0.006

8.2 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.043 0.004 <0.01 <0.01

** exceeds the LOC for listed (RQ > 0.05) and non

- listed (RQ > 0.5) species

* exceeds the LOC for listed species

Estuarine/marine Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column , Acute

R Qs based on acute toxicity to the sheepshead minnow and mysid shrimp and maximum and

average EECs in the water column exceed the acute LOC only for listed invertebrates in the

coastal marina scenario (Table 7 ). No LOC is exceeded for the harbor scenario, even at

predicted maximum exposure (Table 8), or in the waters surrounding the marina.

### 15

Table 7

. Acu te Risk Quotients for Salt water Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water

Column of a Coastal Marina and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

Coastal Marina:

F ish 9.3 0.418 0.276

400 <0.01 <0.01

6 .5 0.286 0.188 <0.01 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.418 0.276

4.7 0.09* 0.06*

6.5 0.286 0.188 0.06* 0.04

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.024 0.001

400 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.017 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0 .024 0.001

4.7 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.017 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01

* exceeds the LOC for listed species (RQ > 0.05)

Table 8

. Acute Risk Quotients for Salt water Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water

Column of a Coastal Harbor and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

Coastal Harbor:

Fish 9.3 0.097 0.048

400 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.068 0.033 <0.01 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.097 0.048

4.7 0.02 0.01

6.5 0.068 0.033 0.01 <0. 01

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.016 0.003

400 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.011 0.002 <0.01 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.016 0.003 4.7 <0.01 <0.01

### 16

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) LC50

(μg ai/L) Acute RQ

max. avg max. avg

6.5 0.011 0.002 <0.01 <0.01

Aquatic Organisms Exposed in the Water Column , Chronic

No chronic LOC is exceede d for any of the inland or coastal scenarios, even at maximum

exposure (i. e., highest leaching rate, highest predicted EECs; Tables 9

- 12). Therefore, chronic

risk to freshwater and saltwater fish and invertebrates is considered to be minimal for the

prop osed antifoulant use of copper pyrithione.

Table 9

. Chronic Risk Quotients for Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the

Water Column of an Inland Marina (400 x 400 m, 3.5 m deep) and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day ) EEC (μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Chronic RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inland Marina:

Fish 9.3 0.409 0.269

0.98 0.42 0.27

6 .5 0.286 0.188 0.29 0.19

Invertebrates 9.3 0.409 0.269

2.7 0.15 0.10

6 .5 0.286 0.188 0.10 0.07

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.02 4 0.001

0.98 0.02 <0.01

6.5 0.017 <0.001 0.02 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.024 0.001

2.7 <0.01 <0.01

6.5 0.017 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01

### 17

Table 1 0

. Chronic Risk Quotients for Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the

Water Column of a n Inland Small Marina ( 10 0 x 100 m, 2 m deep)

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Chronic RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inland Small Marina:

Fish 9.3 1.560 0.981

0.98 1.6* 1.0*

6. 5 1.090 0.686 1.1* 0.7

Invertebrates 9. 3 1.560 0.981

2.7 0.6 0.36

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.4 0.25

Surrounding waters:

Fish 9.3 0.062 0.006

0.98 0.06 <0.01

6.5 0.043 0.004 0.04 <0.01

Invertebrates 9.3 0.062 0.006

2.7 0.02 <0.01

6.5 0.043 0.004 0.02 <0.01

* exceeds the chronic LOC (RQ > 1) f or listed and nonlisted species

Table 1 1

. Chronic Risk Quotients for Salt water Invertebrates Exposed in the Water

Column of a Coastal Marina and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Chronic RQ

max. avg max. avg

Coastal Marina:

Invertebrates 9. 3 0.418 0.276

2.2 0.2 0.1

6 .5 0.286 0.188 0.1 <0.1

Surrounding waters:

Invertebrates 9. 3 0.024 0.001

2.2 <0.1 <0. 1

6 .5 0.017 <0.001 <0.1 <0. 1

### 18

Table 1 2

. Chronic Risk Quotients for Salt water Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the

Water Column of a Coastal Harbor and Surrounding Waters

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Chronic RQ

max. avg max. avg

Coastal Harbor:

Invertebrates 9.3 0.097 0.048

2.2 < 0.1 <0.1

6.5 0.068 0.033 <0.1 <0.1

Surrounding waters:

Invertebrates 9.3 0.016 0.003

2.2 <0.1 <0.1

6.5 0.011 0.002 <0.1 <0.1

Invertebrates Exposed to C ontaminated Sediments , Acute

Minimal risk is presumed for benthic organisms exposed to coppe r pyrithione in sediments of

marinas or harbors. RQs based on the highest maximum sediment concentrations are several

orders of m agnitude below the LOC (Table 13 ). RQs based on average EECs and lower leaching

rates would be even lower than those tabulate d for the highest exposure scenarios. Some

uncertainty exists for saltwater invertebrates, because a definitive toxicity value was not

established. However, because the exposure values are exceedingly low, it seems highly

unlikely that establishing the t oxicity to saltwater invertebrates would lead to any exceedance of

the LOC.

Table 13

. Acute Risk Quotients for Freshwater and Saltwater Invertebrates Exposed to

Contaminated Sediment in Inland and Coastal Marinas

Site/

Taxa Leaching rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) Max. EEC

(μg/g dry wt) Toxicity

(μg/g dry wt) Max.

Acute RQ

Inland Small Marina:

Freshwater amphipod 9. 3 0.0000018 2.1 <<0.01

Coastal Marina:

Saltwater amphi pod 9. 3 0.0000017 <1.08 <<0.01

It should be mentioned that MAM

- PEC predicted sediment c oncentrations after 2, 5, and 10

years are the same as those predicted after one year. Those prediction s are based solely on the

### 19

initial exposure at Day 0 and do not consider any subsequent copper pyrithione input into the

aquatic environment . In fact, e xisting watercraft would be retreated , new craft may be treated,

and other treated craft may be entering marinas . Therefore, sediment concentrations might

actually increas e over time, not remain constant, and this adds some uncertainty to the exposure

and risk assessment.

Aquatic Plants

RQs for nonlisted s pecies are presented in Table 14 for both freshwater and saltwater aquatic

plants, based on the various exposure scenarios and the toxicity to duckweed (vascular sp.) and

the most sensitive non

- vascula r species (algae or diatom) . The LOC is not exceeded for vascular

and non

- vascular species in any inland or coastal scenario. The LOC for listed vascular species

also is not exceeded for any scenario at maximum exposure (Table 15).

Table 14

. Risk Quoti ents for Nonlisted Aquatic Plant Species (vascular and non

- vascular)

Exposed in the Water Column of Inland and Coastal Marinas and Harbors

Site/

Taxa Leaching rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) EC50

(μg ai/L) RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inland Marina:

Vascular spp.

9.3 0.409 0.269 8.8 <0.1 <0.1

Non

- vascular spp. 0.409 0.269 2.6 0.2 0.1

Inland Small Marina:

Vascular spp. 9.3 1.560 0.981

8.8 0.2 0.1

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.1 <0.1

Non

- vascular spp. 9.3 1.560 0.981

2.6 0.6 0.4

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.4 0.3

Coastal Marina:

Vascular spp.

9.3 0.418 0.276 8.8 <0.1 <0.1

Non

- vascular spp. 0.418 0.276

2.6 0.2 0.1

6.5 0.286 0.188 0.1 <0.1

Coastal Harbor:

Vascular spp.

9.3 0.097 0.048 8.8 <0.1 <0.1

Non

- vascular spp. 0.068 0.033 2.6 <0.1 <0.1

### 20

Table 15

. R isk Quotients for Listed Vascular Aquatic Plant Species Exposed in the Water

Column of Inland and Coastal Marinas and Harbors

Site/

Taxa Leaching

rate

(  g/cm 2 

### /day) EEC (μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) RQ

max. avg max. avg

Inland Marina:

Vascular spp. 9.3 0.409 0.269

4.0 0.1 <0.1

6 .5 0.286 0.188 <0.1 <0.1

Inland Small Marina:

Vascular spp. 9.3 1.560 0.981

4.0 0.4 0.2

6.5 1.090 0.686 0.3 0.2

Coastal Marina:

Vascular spp. 9.3 0.418 0.276

4.0 0.1 <0.1

6 .5 0.286 0.188 <0.1 <0.1

Coastal Harbor :

Vascular spp. 9.3 0.097 0.048

4.0 <0.1 <0.1

6.5 0.068 0.033 <0.1 <0.1

Aquatic Risk C haracterization

Based on the predicted exposure levels and the risk quotient methodology, RASSB presumes that

the leaching of copper pyrithione from watercraft will pose an acute risk to listed (i. e.,

threatened and endangered) fish and aquatic invertebrates inhabiting inland (freshwater) marinas.

Nonlisted fish also may be at risk in small inland marinas. In coastal (saltwater) settings, l isted

invertebrates are presumed at risk in marinas

, but no acute LOC is exceeded for the harbor

s cenario

. For both inland and coastal settings, m inimal risks are presumed for nontarget aquatic

plants, chronic exposure to fish and invertebr a t es, and exposure of invertebrates to contaminated

sediment

.

Because copper pyrithione is very highly toxic to most freshwater and saltwater organisms in the

water column, potential risks largely depend on the extent of exposure to the leachate. L eaching

data are available for two of the four proposed color formulations, but many uncertainties exist in

the exposure assessment. For the screening assessment, RASSB is relying on the MAM

- PEC

European scenarios, with minor modifications (e.g., temperature, pH) for expected U. S.

conditions. The MAM

- PEC scenarios consider many measured variables for European settings,

### 21

including hydrological and environmental factors

, compartment sizes (e.g., marinas, harbors)

, and watercraft sizes and numbers in marinas and harbors . For example, the default marina

scenario in MAM

- PEC is based on an actual French Mediterranean marina in th e Golfe Juan

(Van Hattum et al. 2002)

. The extent to which these European conditions approximate those of

U. S. marinas and harbors is unknown and needs to be determined. T he risk assessment could be

refined if such information on U. S. coastal and inland marinas and harbors were available. Such

relevant information would include environmental and hydrological conditions, typical

dimensions (and range of dimensions) of fres hwater and coastal marinas and harbors, number

and sizes of watercraft, antifoulant usage, geographical variations in these factors, and others.

RASSB notes that t he EECs in this assessment are based only on the in

- service use of copper

pyrithione leachin g from watercraft hulls in the water . Emission to the environment also can

occur at application of the antifoulant paint to the hull and at removal of paint from the hull

(OECD 2005). The product label states that removed paint chips must be kept out of the water, it

is likely that some will enter the aquatic environment in some situations. Such additional

exposure may add to risk, but the extent of that exposure is uncertain at t his time and is not

addressed in the risk assessment.

It also should be st rongly emphasized that copper oxide also will be leach ing from the proposed

end

- use product, which consists of 3.96% copper pyrithione and 36.2% cuprous oxide . While

RASSB only assesses risks from individual active ingredients , aquatic organisms will be e xposed

to both copper pyrithione and cuprous oxide leaching simultaneously from this antifoulant paint

into the aquatic environment. Cuprous oxide also is highly toxic to aquatic organisms, and

combined exposure to these two active ingredients will likely results in more severe acute and

chronic affects than if the product consisted solely of copper pyrithione. A more refined risk

assessment for the end

- use product would consider the exposure and risk from the simultaneous

exposure of aquatic organisms to both active ingredients.

Copper pyrithione, because it rapidly photodegrades into less toxic degradates, has been touted

as posing considerably less risk to aquatic organisms than do some other current or formerly

registered antifoulants (e.g., TBT) . Wh ile photodegradation does occur rapidly in the presence

of sunlight, photodegradation may be much less pronounced or minimal under conditions of low

light attenuation, such as beneath watercraft, docks, and mooring structures or in the murky

waters typical of many marinas

. Bellas et al. (2005) examined the toxicity of zinc pyrithione to

sea urchin ( Paracentrotus lividus ) and mussel ( Mytilus edulis ). Toxic effects on larval growth of

sea urchin were detected at concentrations as low as 0.16 μg ai/L . The a uthors calculated RQs

based on predicted environmental concentrations reported by Madsen et al. (2000 as cited in

Bellas et al. 2005) in a pleasure

- craft harbor in Europe. When photodegradation was ignored,

RQs = 15 for mussels and 106 for urchins. Howev er, even w hen photodegradation was

considered, RQs = 4.9 for mussels and 35 for urchins. The authors conclude, based on the ir

assertion that a n RQ >1 presumes risk , that zinc pyrithione predicted concentrations in marinas

pose a threat to mussel and urchi n early stages regardless of whether photodegradation is a factor

or not.

### 22

Terrestrial Risk Characterization

Birds and mammals are presumed to have little exposure to copper pyrithione from its use as an

antifoulant coating on boat hulls. Possible rout es of exposure include dermal uptake by

swimming and wading birds in harbors and consumption of fish and invertebrates contain ing

copper pyrithione residues. Based on the available data bridged from z inc pyrithione, RASSB

assumes that copper pyrithione is not likely to bioconcentrate in aquatic organisms

( bioconcentration factor <1 for zinc pyrithione). In addition , copper pyrithione is not highly

toxic to birds or mammals and predicted water concentrations are exceedingly low (parts per

trillion) . There fore, ingestion of prey items exposed to c opper pyrithione is not likely to pose

much risk to birds or wild mammals. Possible adverse affects from dermal exposure are

unknown.

Endangered Species Considerations

Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ES A), 16 U.S.C. Section 1536(a)(2), requires that

federal agencies consult with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for marine and

andronomus listed species, or with the United States Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) for listed

wildlife and freshwat er organisms, if proposing an "action" that may affect listed species or their

designated habitat. Each federal agency is required under the Act to insure that any action they

authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existen ce of a listed species

or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. To jeopardize

the continued existence of a listed species is to "to engage in an action that reasonably would be

expected, directly or indirectly, to reduce appreciably the likelihood of both the survival and

recovery of a listed species in the wild by reducing the reproduction, numbers, or distribution of

the species." 50 C.F.R. §402.02.

To comply with subsection (a)(2) of the ESA, EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs has

established procedures to evaluate whether a proposed registration action may directly or

indirectly appreciably reduce the likelihood of both the survival and recovery of a listed species

in the wild by reducing the reproduction, nu mbers, or distribution of any listed species (U.S.

EPA 2004). If any of the Listed Species LOC Criteria are exceeded for either direct or indirect

effects in the Agency’s screening

- level risk assessment, the Agency identifies any listed or

candidate speci es that may occur spatially and temporally in the footprint of the proposed use.

Further biological assessment is undertaken to refine the risk. The extent to which any species

may be at risk determines the need to develop a more comprehensive consultati on package as

required by the ESA.

The assessment for the proposed antifoulant paint use indicates that there is a potential for

copper pyrithione exposure of listed freshwater and estuarine/marine organisms , and a more

refined assessment is warranted for direct, indirect, and habitat effects. The refined assessment

will involve clear delineation of the action area associated with proposed use of copper

pyrithione and best available information on the temporal and spatial co

- location of listed species

wit h respect to the action area. A species

- specific endangered species effect determination has

not been conducted for this assessment but will be conducted during R egistration Review

.

### 23

References

Bellas, J., Å. Granmo, and R. Beiras. 2005. Embryotoxic ity of the antifouling biocide zinc

pyrithione to sea urchin ( Paracentrotus lividus ) and mussel ( Mytilus edulis ). Marine Pollution

Bull. 50:1382

- 1385.

Madsen, T., K. Gustavsson, L. Samsøe

- Petersen, F. Simonsen, J. Jakobsen, S. Foverskov, and

M.M. Larsen

. 2000. Ecotoxicological assessments of antifouling biocides and nonbiocidal

paints. Environmental Project No. 531. Danish Environmental Protection Agency.

Maraldo, K. and L. Dahliof. 2004. Seasonal variations in the effect of zine pyrithione and

coppe r pyrithione on pelagic phytoplankton communities. Aquatic toxicology (2004)): 189

- 198.

OECD. 2005. Emission Scenario Document on Antifouling Products

. OECD Environmental

Health and Safety Publications

, OECD S eries on E mission S cenario D ocuments N o. 1 3

, ENV/JM/MONO(2005)8

, Organisation for Economic Co

- operation and Development , 166 pp.

Onduka, T., K. Mochida, K. Ito, A. Kakuno, and K. Fujii. 2007. Acute toxicity of pyrithione

photodegradation products to some marine organisms. Shipbuilding Technol. ISST, pp. 99

- 106.

Van Hattum, B., A.. Baart and J. Boon (2002). Computer model to generate predicted

e nvironmental concentrations (PECs) for antifouling products in the marine environment. Report

number 2002/E

- 02

- 04 / Z 3117. Web

- site: www.cepe.org; Publ ications; Antifouling products.

### 24

Appendix A: Data Requirements and Available Guideline Ecotoxicity Data for Copper

Pyrithione

The toxicity endpoints used in OPP's assessments are obtained from guideline toxicity studies

conducted for wildlife, aquatic o rganisms, and plants (40 CFR §158). Guideline studies are

required to provide acute and reproductive/chronic measures of effect for one or more test

species in several taxonomic groups. Some studies are only required on a case

- by

- case basis,

depending on factors such as use patterns and environmental fate characteristics.

The new chemical screen for copper pyrithione, dated June 2, 2004, determined that a full

ecotoxicity data set for copper pyrithione will not be required. The available data submitte d (if

deemed acceptable after review) were considered to be sufficiently similar to the existing data

for zinc pyrithione to allow bridging between these two pyrithione compounds.

Terrestrial Animals

Birds, Acute and Dietary

The Agency requires one acute

- oral study to establish the toxicity of copper pyrithione (technical

grade active ingredient, TGAI) to birds. The preferred test species is either the mallard ( Anas

platyrhynchos ) or the northern bobwhite ( Colinus virginianus ). Avian dietary toxici ty studies

(northern bobwhite and mallard) are conditionally required for antimicrobial pesticides used as

antifoulant coatings and paint . The available acute

- oral and dietary studies indicate that the

pyrithione s are moderately to practically nontoxic to birds (Table 1 A ). The guidelines for avian

acute

- oral toxicity (OPPTS 850.2100) and avian dietary toxicity OPPTS 850.2200) are satisfied.

Tabl e 1 A . Acute

- oral (LD50) and Dietary (LC50) Toxicity to Birds

Test

Species Test material

(% ai) Toxicity End point

(95% CI) Toxicity

Category Study

Status MRID

No.

Northern

bobwhite copper

pyrithione

(99.5) LD50 = 126 mg ai/kg bw

(84

- 194) moderately

toxic core 457743

- 21

Zinc pyrithione

(96) LD50 = 60 mg ai/kg bw

(44

- 81) moderately

toxic core 43864611

LC50 = 1063 ppm ai

(789

- 1412) slightly

toxic core 438646

- 10

Mallard Zinc pyrithione

(96) LC50 >5000 ppm ai practically

nontoxic core 438646

- 12

### 25

Mammals, Acute

The available mammalian acute toxicity data indicate that the pyrithione s are slightly to

mo derately toxic to small mammals on an acute

- oral basis ( lab. rat LD50s = 630 mg ai/kg bw,

males, and 460 mg ai/kg bw, females; MRID 428279

- 01 ). Refer to the human toxicology

chapter for more details on these and other mammalian toxicity studies submitted in support of

the human

- health assessment.

Aquatic Organisms

Freshwater Fish, Acute

S tudies are required with the TGAI to establish the acute toxicity of copper pyrithione to two

species of freshwater fish. The preferred test species are the rainbow t rout ( Oncorhynchus

mykiss ), a coldwater fish, and the bluegill ( Lepomis macrochirus ), a sunfish. Both copper

pyrithione and zinc pyrithione are very highly toxic to freshwater fish (Table 2 A ) . The guideline

for freshwater

- fish acute toxicity ( OPPTS 850.1 075 ) is satisfied.

Table 2 A

. Acute Toxicity of Copper Pyrithione and Zinc Pyrithione to Freshwater Fish

Exposed in the Water Column

Test

Species Test material

(% ai) 96

- h LC50

(μg ai/L)

(95% CI) Toxicity

Category Study

Status MRID

No.

Rainbow

trou t zinc pyrithione (97.8) 3.6

(3.0

- 4.3) very highly

toxic core 438646

- 13

Fathead

minnow zinc pyrithione (97.8) 2.6

(2.1

- 3.2) very highly

toxic core 438646

- 06

copper pyrithione (94.7) 4.3

(3.7

- 5.0) very highly

toxic core 457743

- 18



### Freshwater Invertebr ates, Acute

A study with the TGAI is required to establish the acute toxicity of copper pyrithione to

freshwater invertebrates. The preferred test species is the water flea, Daphnia magna

. Both

copper pyrithione and zinc pyrithione are very highly toxic to fish (Table 3 A ). The guideline

requirement (OPPTS 850.1010) is satisfied.

### 26

Table 3 A

. Acute Toxicity of Copper Pyrithione and Zinc pyrithione to Freshwater

Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column

Test

Species Test material

(% ai) 48

- h EC50

(μ g ai/L)

(95% CI) Toxicity

Category Study

Status MRID

No.

Waterflea copper

pyrithione (94.7) 10.1

(7.9

- 13) very highly toxic core 457743

- 16

zinc pyrithione

(97.8) 8.2

(5.2

- 25.8) very highly toxic core 438646

- 04



### Estuarine/Marine Fish and Inverte brates, Acute

Acute toxicity data for the TGAI with estuarine/marine fish and two invertebrate species are

required for antifoulant coatings and paints, because of their direct release via leaching into the

estuarine/marine environment. The preferred fis h test species is sheepshead minnow

( Cyprinodon variegatus ) 

### and preferred invertebrate species are the mysid shrimp ( Mysidopsis

bahia ) and Eastern oyster ( Crassostrea virginica ). The available data categorize copper

pyrithione and zinc pyrithione as being highly toxic to saltwater fish and very highly toxic to

saltwater invertebrates (Table 4 A ). The guideline requirements for estuarine/marine fish and

invertebrate acute toxicity testing ( OPPTS 850.1075

, 850.1025, and 850.1035 ) are satisfied.

Table 4 A

. Acute Toxicity of Copper Pyrithione and Zinc Pyrithione to Estuarine/Marine

Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column

Test

Species Test material

(% ai) 96

- h LC50

(μg ai/L)

(95% CI) Toxicity

Category Study

Status MRID

No.

Sheepshead

min now zinc pyrithione

(97.8) 400

(200

- 590) highly toxic core 438646

- 05

Mysid shrimp zinc pyrithione

(97.8) 4.7

(4.0

- 5.5) very highly

toxic core 438646

- 07

Eastern oyster copper

pyrithione (94.7) 9.2

(0

- ∞) very highly

toxic core 457743

- 17

zinc pyrithion e

(97.8) 22.0

(18.9

- 27.3) very highly

toxic core 438646

- 08

### 27

Degradates, Acute Toxicity to Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates

Some acute toxicity data are available for two of the pyrithione degradates (pyridine sulfonic

acid and pyrithione sulfonic acid). The data are sufficient to categorize both degradates as being

only slightly toxic to practically nontoxic to freshwater and saltwater fish and invertebrates

(Table 5 A ).

Table 5 A

. Acute Toxicity of Two Pyrithione Degradates to Fish and Aquatic Inverteb rates

Exposed in the Water Column

Test

Species Test material

(% ai) 96

- h LC50

(μg ai/L)

(95% CI) Toxicity

Category Study

Status MRID

No.

Rainbow

trout pyridine sulfonic acid (98) 57,100

(48,300

- 69,800) slightly toxic core 438646

- 27

pyrithione sulf

onic acid

(98.5) 92,300

(73,600

- 124,000) slightly toxic core 438646

- 16

pyridine sulfonic acid (98) 68,500

(55,200

- 85,000) slightly toxic core 438646

- 21

pyrithione sulfonic acid

(98.5) 58,800

(48,700

- 71,000) slightly toxic core 438646

- 18

Waterflea pyr idine sulfonic acid (98) >122,000 practically

nontoxic core 438646

- 22

pyrithione sulfonic acid

(98.5) >127,000 practically

nontoxic core 438646

- 19

Sheepshead

minnow pyridine sulfonic acid (98) >127,000 practically

nontoxic core 438646

- 23

pyrithione su lfonic acid

(98.5) >137,000 practically

nontoxic core 438646

- 17

Mysid

shrimp pyridine sulfonic acid (98) 71,000

(62,800

- 81,100) slightly toxic core 438646

- 26

pyrithione sulfonic acid

(98.5) 70,300

(61,600

- 81,600) slightly toxic core 438646

- 20

Eastern

o yster pyridine sulfonic acid (98) 85.600

(73,300

- 102,500) slightly toxic core 438646

- 24

### 28 pyrithione sulfonic acid

(98.5) 96,200

(89,313

- 104,560) slightly toxic core 438646

- 15



### Aquatic Organisms, Chronic

Chronic testing of fish and aquatic invertebrates is required for copper pyrithione, because it is

discharged via leaching directly into the aquatic environment. The preferred test species are the

fish and invertebrate species most sensitive in the acute studies. The available data for the

pyrithiones and degradates indicate that adverse affects on survival, growth, and reproduction

occur at concentrations from about 1 to 10 μg ai/L 

### (Table 6 A ). The guideline requirements

(OPPTS 850.1400, 850.1300/1350) are satisfied.

Table 6 A . Chronic Toxicity of Cop per Pyrithione and Zinc Pyrithione and a Degradate to

Freshwater Fish and Invertebrates Exposed in the Water Column

Test

Species % ai

tested NOEC/LOEC

(μg ai/L) Endpoints

affected Study Status MRID No.

Fathead

minnow copper

pyrithione

(96.4) 0.98 / 1.9 survival, sublethal

effects, length,

weight core 457743

- 18

zinc

pyrithione

(98.2) 1.2 / 2.8 hatching,

growth,

sublethal effects core 452041

- 02

pyridine

- 2

-

sulfonic

acid (98.2) NOEC = 10 none at the highest

concentration tested core 452041

- 02

Waterfle a zinc

pyrithione

(98.2) 2.7 / 5.8 reproduction,

growth core 445354

- 01

Mysid

shrimp zinc

pyrithione

(98.2) 2.2 / 4.2

4.2 / 9.1 growth

reproduction core 449111

- 01



### Aquatic Plants

Aquatic plant growth testing (TGAI or TEP) is required for copper pyrithio ne because of its

discharge via leaching into the aquatic environment. Test species include duckweed ( Lemna

gibba ), a vascular plant, and four non

- vascular species: (1) freshwater green alga, Selenastrum

capricornutum, (2) marine diatom, Skeletonema cost atum, (3) freshwater diatom, Navicula

pelliculosa, and (4) bluegreen cyanobacteria, Anabaena flos

- aquae. The available aquatic plant

data indicate that the marine diatom is the most sensitive species (Table 7 A ). The guideline

### 29

requirement for aquatic plan t growth testing (OPPTS 850.5400) is satisfied.

Table 7 A

. Toxicity of Copper Pyrithione and Zinc Pyrithione to Aquatic Plants

Test

Species % ai

tested EC50

(μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Study

Status MRID

No.

Duckweed zinc pyrithione (97.8) 8.8 4.0 cor e 452041

- 04

Freshwater

green alga zinc pyrithione (97.8) 28 7.8 core 438646

- 09

copper pyrithione (94.7) 35 18 core 457743

- 19

Blue

- green

alga zinc pyrithione (98.3) 7.1 3.8 core 455649

- 01

Marine diatom zinc pyrithione (98.2) 0.65 0.46 core 462503

- 05

Freshwater

diatom zinc pyrithione (98.3) 2.6 2.4 core 455650

- 01



### Freshwater green alga also were tested with two degradates. Both degradates are considerably

less toxic to green alga than are copper pyrithione and zinc pyrithione (Table 8 A ). However,

there are data in the literature demonstrating that two photodegradates (2

- mercaptopyridine

- N

oxide and 2.2'

- dithio

- bis

- pyridin

- N

- oxide) are about as toxic (1.1

- 3.4 μg ai/L 

### ) to the marine

diatom as are the parent pyrithiones (Onduka et al. 2007).

Table 8 A

. Toxicity of Two Pyrithione Degradates to Aquatic Plants

Test

Species % ai

tested EC50

(μg ai/L) NOEC

(μg ai/L) Study

Status MRID

No.

Freshwater

green alga pyridine sulfonic acid

(98) 28,900 5460 core 438646

- 25

pyrithione sulfonic acid

(98.5) 28,200 11,800 core 438646

- 14



### Terrestrial Plants

A seedling

- emerge test with rice ( Oryza sativa ) is required for all pesticides having antifoulant

paint and coating uses. Data were not submitted for copper pyrithione, but a study available for

zinc pyr ithione determined an EC25 (Table 9 A ). The guideline requirement (OPPTS 850.4225)

is satisfied.

### 30

Table 9 A

. Seedling

- emergence Toxicity of Zinc Pyrithione to Rice

Test

Species Test % ai

tested EC25

(mg ai/kg) NOEC

(mg ai/kg) Study

Status MRID

No.

Rice seedling

emergence zinc

pyrithione

(98.3) 172 100 core 462503

- 01



### Sediment Toxicity

Acute, whole

- sediment tests with freshwater and saltwater invertebrates are required for

antifoulant paints and coatings. Two studies were conducted with zinc pyr ithione (Table 10 A ).

However, the study testing a marine amphipod did not establish an EC50, and thus is not

adequate to calculate an RQ. The guideline requirement (OPPTS 850.1735) is satisfied.

However, because an EC50 or LC50 was not determined for th e marine amphipod, the guideline

requirement (OPPTS 850.1740) is not satisfied for a whole

- sediment acute toxicity test with a

marine invertebrate.

Table 10 A

. Acute Sediment Toxicity of Zinc Pyrithione to Freshwater and

Estuarine/Marine Invertebrates

Te st

Species % ai 10

- d EC50/LC50

(mg/kg dry sediment) Study Status MRID No.

Freshwater

amphipod

( Hyalella azteca ) zinc pyrithione

(98.2) 2.1 core 462503

- 03

Marine amphipod

( Leptocheirus

plumulosus ) zinc pyrithione

(98.2) <1.08 supplemental 462503

- 04

### 31

Appendix B: Copper Pyrithione MAM

- PEC Runs for U. S. Inland and Coastal Marinas

and Harbors and Surrounding Waters

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

11/10/2008



### MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs) for Antifoulant use of

Copper Pyrithion

From: Siroos Mostaghimi, Ph.D., Senior Scientist

Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch (RASSB)

Antimicrobials Division (7510 P )

To: Norm Cook, Chief

Risk Assessment and Science Support Branch (RASSB)

Antimicrobials Division (7510 P )

Chemical NO: 08 8001

DP No.: 346521

Attached please find the Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs) for antifoulant use

of Copper Pyrithion . The MAM

- PEC (Version 2) model was used to estimate the concentrations

of Copper Pyrithion TBTO in water and sediments from application of antifoulant paints applied

on ships and other water recreational vehicles.

### 32



# Background:

The Arch Chemicals, Inc. has submitted an application for registra tion for a

manufacturing use product containing Copper Omadine (Copper pyrithion), for use only in

formulating antifoulant paints. This report provides Estimated Environmental Concentrations

(EECs) for the use of Copper pyrithion as an antifoulant.

MAM

- PEC is used as an assessment tool for antifoulant risk assessments in Europe.

MAM

- PEC was developed by the Institute of Environmental Studies/IVM and Delft Hydraulics

for the European Paint Makers Association (CEPE) for conducting risk assessments for

an tifouling agents. The model provides prediction of environmental concentrations of

antifouling products in six generalized “typical” marine environments (commercial harbor,

estuarine harbor, marina, marina poorly flushed, open sea, and shipping lane). The version 2 of

MAMPEC was used for this report.

EECs are generated using MAMPEC for the highest leaching rates (9.3 μg/cm 2 

### /day, dark

red formulation; 6.5 μg/cm 2 

### /day, brown formulation) for all scenarios.

Several MAMPEC scenarios were chosen for these runs which are briefly described

below.

The estimated environmental concentrations (EECs) could be used for ecological risk

assessment based on the availability of ecological toxicity data.



# Summary of the Results:

Scenario 1

- Inland Marina

Input



### En vironment : Default marina 1

- Fresh water

- InLand

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- Fresh Water

- Inland

Load : 4.37E+02:g/d (LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day and 6.26E+02:g/d (LR=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day )

A summary of the results for MAMPEC model run s for Inland Marina for two leaching

rates (9 .3 μg /cm 2 

### /day and 6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day ) are presented in T able 1 and 2 . Total and dissolved

concentrations in water as well as concentrations of Copper Pyrithion in sediment s after one year

are sh ow n

. The detailed input and output of the MAMPEC model run are shown in Appendix

A.

### 33

Table 1. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion in an inland marina

-- The

leaching rate was 6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μ g /l Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 2.86E

- 01 2.82E

- 01 8.07E

- 02 3.38E

- 07



### 95% confidence 2.76E

- 01 2.72E

- 01 7.77E

- 02 3.26E

- 07



### Average

concentration 1.88E

- 01 1.85E

- 01 5.30E

- 02 2.22E

- 07



### Median

concentrat ion 1.86E

- 01 1.84E

- 01 5.25E

- 02 2.20E

- 07



### Minimum

concentration 3.96E

- 02 3.91E

- 02 1.12E

- 02 4.68E

- 08



### Table 2. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion in an inland Marina The

leaching rate was 9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) D issolved (μg /l Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 4.09E

- 01 4.04E

- 01 1.15E

- 01 4.84E

- 07



### 95% confidence 3.94E

- 01 3.89E

- 01 1.11E

- 01 4.67E

- 07



### Average

concentration 2.69E

- 01 2.65E

- 01 7.58E

- 02 3.18E

- 07



### Median

concentration 2.66E

- 01 2.63E

- 01 7.51E

- 02 3.15E

- 07



### Minimum

concentration 5.66E

- 02 5.59E

- 02 1.60E

- 02 6.70E

- 08



### Scenario 2

- Inland Small Marina

Environment : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 10 0% Cu

- Omadine

- 6.5

Load : 9.75E+01:g/d (LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day ) and 1.40E+02:g/d (LR=9.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day )

A summary of the results for this MAMPEC model run s are presented in T able 3 and 4

. Total and dissolved concentrations in water as well as concentrations of Copper Pyrithion in

### 34

sediment after one year are show n

. The detailed input and output of the MAMPEC model run

are shown in Appendix B.

Table 3 . Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion in a Small Inland Marina

- The

leaching rate was 6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /l) Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 1.09E+00 1.07E+00 3.07E

- 01 1.29E

- 06



### 95% confidence 1.09E+00 1.07E+00 3.07E

- 01 1.29E

- 06



### Average

concentration 6.86E

- 01 6.77E

- 01 1.93E

- 01 8.12E

- 07



### Median

concentration 6.38E

- 01 6.30E

- 01 1.80E

- 01 7.55E

- 07



### Minimum

concentration 2.22E

- 01 2.19E

- 01 6.25E

- 02 2.62E

- 07



### Table 4. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion, in a Small Inland Mrina. The

leac hing rate was 9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /l Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 1.56E+00 1.54E+00 4.39E

- 01 1.84E

- 06



### 95% confidence 1.56E+00 1.54E+00 4.39E

- 01 1.84E

- 06



### Average

concentration 9.81E

- 01 9.69E

- 01 2.77E

- 01 1.16E

- 06



### Median

concentration 9.12E

- 01 9.01E

- 01 2.57E

- 01 1.08E

- 06



### Minimum

concentration 3.17E

- 01 3.13E

- 01 8.95E

- 02 3.75E

- 07



### Scenario 3

- Coastal Marina

Environment : Default marina for salt water

Comp ound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

Load : 4.37E+02:g/d (LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day ) and 6.26E+02:g/d (LR=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day )

A summary of the results for this MAMPEC model run s are presented in T able 5 and 6

.

### 35

Total and disso lved concentrations in water as well as concentrations of Copper Pyrithion in

sediment after one year are show n

. The detailed input and output of the MAMPEC model run

are shown in Appendix C.

Table. 5. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrith ion in a Coastal Marina. The

Leaching rate used was 6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day.

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /L) Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 2.86E

- 01 2.82E

- 01 8.07E

- 02 1.69E

- 06



### 95% confidence 2.76E

- 01 2.72E

- 01 7.77E

- 02 1.63E

- 06



### Average

concentration 1.88E

- 01 1.85E

- 01 5.30E

- 02 1.11E

- 06



### Median

concentration 1.86E

- 01 1.84E

- 01 5.25E

- 02 1.10E

- 06



### Minimum

concentration 3.96E

- 02 3.91E

- 02 1.12E

- 02 2.34E

- 07



### Table 6. Estimated Environmental Concent rations of Cu

- Pyrithion in a Coastal Marina. The

leaching rate used was 9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /L) Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 4.18E

- 01 4.13E

- 01 1.18E

- 01 2.48E

- 06



### 95% confidence 4.03E

- 01 3.98E

- 01 1.14E

- 01 2.38E

- 06



### Average

concentration 2.76E

- 01 2.72E

- 01 7.78E

- 02 1.63E

- 06



### Median

concentration 2.74E

- 01 2.71E

- 01 7.74E

- 02 1.62E

- 06



### Minimum

concentration 5.83E

- 02 5.76E

- 02 1.64E

- 02 3.45E

- 07



### Scenario 4

- Coastal Har bor

Environment : Default estuarine harbor 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Estuarine Harbour

- 1

Load : 6.29E+03:g/d (LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day ) and 8.99E+03:g/d (LR=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day )

A summary of the results for this MAMPEC model run s a re presented in T able 7 and 8

. Total and dissolved concentrations in water as well as concentrations of Copper Pyrithion in

### 36

sediment after one year are show n

. The detailed input and output of the MAMPEC model run

are shown in Appendix D.

Table. 7. Esti mated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion in a Costal Harbor. The

Leaching rate used was 6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day.

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /L) Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

concentration 6.76E

- 02 6.68E

- 02 1.91E

- 02 4.00E

- 07



### 95% confidence 6.24E

- 02 6.16E

- 02 1.76E

- 02 3.69E

- 07



### Average

concentration 3.34E

- 02 3.30E

- 02 9.42E

- 03 1.98E

- 07



### Median

concentration 2.56E

- 02 2.53E

- 02 7.23E

- 03 1.52E

- 07



### Minimum

concentration 4.95E

- 03 4.89E

- 03 1.40E

- 03 2.93E

- 0 8



### Table 8. Estimated Environmental Concentrations of Cu

- Pyrithion in a Costal Harbor. The

leaching rate used was 9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Total concentration

(μg /l) Dissolved (μg /L) Suspended matter

(μg /g dw) Sediment

after one year

(μg /g) dw

Maximum

co ncentration 9.68E

- 02 9.55E

- 02 2.73E

- 02 5.72E

- 07



### 95% confidence 8.93E

- 02 8.81E

- 02 2.52E

- 02 5.28E

- 07



### Average

concentration 4.78E

- 02 4.72E

- 02 1.35E

- 02 2.83E

- 07



### Median

concentration 3.67E

- 02 3.62E

- 02 1.03E

- 02 2.17E

- 07



### Minimum

concentration 7.09E

- 03 7.00E

- 0 3 2.00E

- 03 4.19E

- 08



### These EECs from these scenarios could be used for ecological risk assessment of both

fresh and salt water.

### 37

References:

Baart, T, Boon, J, and B. Van Hattum. 200 8 . User Manual

- Quick Guide. MAM

- PEC Version

2 . European C ommission, CEPEWL, IRM.

USEPA. 2007. Review of the Leach rate data for interswift 655 BMA008 brown containing

cuprous oxide (36.2%) and copper pyrithion (3.96%) antifoulant agent. Sriniwas Gowda to

Marshall Swindle. June 12, 2007

File: C: \ Myfiles \ 200 8 Reports \ Cu

- Pyrithion/ Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs)

for Copper Pyrithion



### CC: RASSB Chemical File

Siroos Mostaghimi /RASSB

### 38 

# Appendix A

Inputs, parameters and out put results from the MAMPEC Model run for Scenario 1

### 39

MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Leaching Rate=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Run : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1 Copper Omad ine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

9.3

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 2:05:47 PM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina 1

- Fresh water

- InLand

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- Fresh Wa ter

- Inland

Load : 4.37E+02:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.86E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.76E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.88E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.86E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.96 E

- 02 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.72E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.85E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.84E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.91E

- 02 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 8.07E

- 02 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.77E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.30E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 5.25E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.12E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contamina nt concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 3.38E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.26E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.22E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.20E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.68E

- 08 :ug/ g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 3.38E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.26E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.22E

- 07 :ug/g dw

### 40

Median concentration : 2.20E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 3.38E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.26E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.22E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.20E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimu m concentration : 4.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 3.38E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.26E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.22E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.20E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.67E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.47E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.15E

- 04 :ug/l

Median concentration : 7.59E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 6.45E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.65E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.45E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.03E

- 04 :ug/l

Median concentration : 7.49E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum c oncentration : 6.37E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 4.70E

- 03 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.14E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.58E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.14E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum c oncentration : 1.82E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 1.97E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.74E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.08E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 8.98E

- 09 :ug /g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.63E

- 09 :ug/g dw

### 41

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.97E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.74E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.08E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentra tion : 8.98E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.63E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.97E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.74E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.08E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 8.98E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.63E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.97E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.74E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1. 08E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 8.98E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.63E

- 09 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Va por pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60 E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological deg radation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

### 42

Environment

Description : Default marina 1

- Fre sh water

- InLand

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 5.00E+00 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 1.0 0E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.00E

- 01 :m/d

pH : 6.5 :(

- )

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrat ions : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 400 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 400 :m

Leng th of harbor (x2) : 400 :m

Width of river (y2) : 400 :m

Depth of harbor : 3.5 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 100 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 350 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 3.5 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width sele cted area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 243420 :m3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- Fresh Water

- Inland

Load : 437.2875 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 437.2875 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 299

Number o f ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 0

### 43

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of movin g ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Applica tion factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 2 0 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 : m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : all assumptions are like the inland maris scenario except LR=6.5

### 44

MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Leaching Rate 9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Run : Default marina

- Swiss marin a 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

9.3

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 2:09:38 PM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina 1

- Fresh water

- InLand

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- O madine

- Fresh Water9.3

Load : 6.26E+02:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 4.09E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 3.94E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.69E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.66E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentra tion : 5.66E

- 02 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 4.04E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 3.89E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.65E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.63E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 5.59E

- 02 :ug/l

C ontaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 1.15E

- 01 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.11E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.58E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.51E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.60E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 4.84E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.67E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.18E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.15E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 6.7 0E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 45

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 4.84E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.67E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.18E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.15E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 6.70E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 4.84E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.67E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.18E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.15E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 6.70E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 4.84E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.67E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.18E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentra tion : 3.15E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 6.70E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.39E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.10E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.31E

- 03 :ug/l

Median c oncentration : 1.09E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 9.23E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.36E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.07E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.29E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.07E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 9.11E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 6.73E

- 03 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.92E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.69E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.06E

- 03 :ug /g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.60E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.48E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.55E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.28E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 46

Minimum concentration : 1.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.48E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.55E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Media n concentration : 1.28E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.48E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.55E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.28E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.48E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concent ration : 1.55E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.28E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Bio logical degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

### 47

Description : Default mar ina 1

- Fresh water

- InLand

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 5.00E+00 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top lay er : 1.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.00E

- 01 :m/d

pH : 6.5 :(

- )

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background c oncentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 400 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 400 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 400 :m

Width of river (y2) : 400 :m

Depth of harbor : 3.5 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 100 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 350 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 3.5 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

W idth selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 243420 :m3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- Fresh Water9.3

Load : 625.6575 :g/d

Loadin g due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 625.6575 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 299

Num ber of ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

### 48

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Ap plication factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9 ) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : all assumptions are like the inland maris scenario except LR=9.3

### 49 

# Appendix B

Inputs, parameters and out put results from the MAM PEC Model run for Scenario 2

MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Small Marina

– LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

### 50

Run : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

6.5

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 1:5 5:12 PM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- 6.5

Load : 9.75E+01:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.09E+00 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.09E+00 :ug/l

Average concentration : 6.86E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 6.38E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.22E

- 01 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.07E+00 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.07E+00 :ug/l

Average concentration : 6.77E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 6.30E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.19E

- 01 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 3.07E

- 01 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.07E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.93E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.80E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 6.25E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.2 9E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 8.12E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.55E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.62E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % con centration : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 8.12E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.55E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.62E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

### 51

Maximum concentration : 1.29E

- 06 : ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 8.12E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.55E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.62E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentrat ion : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.29E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 8.12E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.55E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.62E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

M aximum concentration : 4.30E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 4.22E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 4.08E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.54E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 1.86E

- 02 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 4. 28E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 4.17E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 4.03E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.50E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 1.84E

- 02 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 1.22E

- 02 :ug/ g dw

95 % concentration : 1.19E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.15E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.15E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 5.25E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 5.13E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.99E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 4.83E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.00E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.20E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.13E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.99E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 4.83E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.00E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.20E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 52

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.13E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.99E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 4.83E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.00E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.20E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sedime nt after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.13E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.99E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 4.83E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.00E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.20E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input da ta sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (K ow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1. 76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E +00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic c arbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 5.00E+00 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 1.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.00E

- 01 :m/d

### 53

pH : 6.5 :(

- )

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non t idal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 100 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 100 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 100 :m

Width of river (y2) : 100 :m

Depth of harbor : 2 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 30 :m

Flow : 0.1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 60 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 2 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 15383 :m3

Reference : This is a Swiss Marina scenario taken from OECD 2005 report

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- 6.5

Load : 97.5 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 97.5 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at bert h : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 75

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Clas s 5) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0

### 54

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater shi p area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : Coastal M artina

- LR=6.5



### MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Small Marina

– Leaching Rate=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

### 55

Run : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

9.3

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 1:57:41 PM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- 9.3

Load : 1.40E+02:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.56E+00 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.56E+00 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.81E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 9.12E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.17E

- 01 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.54E+00 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.54E+00 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.69E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 9.01E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.13E

- 01 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 4.39E

- 01 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.39E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Average concen tration : 2.77E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.57E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 8.95E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.16E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.08E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.75E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1. 84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.16E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.08E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.75E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

### 56

Maximum concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % co ncentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.16E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.08E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.75E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.84E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.16E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.08E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.75E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentr ation : 6.20E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 6.04E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 5.84E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 3.63E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.66E

- 02 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 6.12E

- 02 :ug/l

9 5 % concentration : 5.96E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 5.77E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 3.58E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.63E

- 02 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 1.75E

- 02 :ug/g dw

95 % conce ntration : 1.70E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.65E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.02E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.51E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 7.34E

- 08 :ug/ g dw

95 % concentration : 7.14E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 6.91E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.29E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.15E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 7.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.14E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 6.91E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.29E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.15E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 57

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximu m concentration : 7.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.14E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 6.91E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.29E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.15E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 yea rs of use

Maximum concentration : 7.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.14E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 6.91E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.29E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.15E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compo und

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hy drolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advan ced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 5.00E+00 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 1.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.00E

- 01 :m/d

pH : 6.5 :(

- )

### 58

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal water leve l change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 100 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 100 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 100 :m

Width of river (y2) : 100 :m

Depth of harbor : 2 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 30 :m

Flow : 0 .1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 60 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 2 :m

Height underwa ter dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 15383 :m3

Reference : This is a Swiss Marina scenario taken from OECD 2005 report

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

- 9.3

Load : 139.5 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 139.5 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug /cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 75

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 0

Nu mber of ships at berth (Class 6) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ship s (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

### 59

Number of moving s hips (Class 9) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Appl ication factor (Class 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Clas s 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : Coastal Martina

- LR=9. 3

### 60 

# Appendix C

Inputs, parameters and out put results from the MAMPEC Model run for Scenario 3

### 61

MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Coastal Marina

- Leaching rate=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

Run : Default marina for salt wat er Copper Omadine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 11:08:23 AM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina for salt water

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

Loa d : 4.37E+02:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.86E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.76E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.88E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.86E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.96E

- 02 :ug/l

D issolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.82E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.72E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.85E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.84E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.91E

- 02 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 8.07E

- 02 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.77E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.30E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 5.25E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.12E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentrati on in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 1.69E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.11E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.10E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.34E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contamin ant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.69E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.11E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.10E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.34E

- 07 :u g/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

### 62

Maximum concentration : 1.69E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.11E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.10E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentratio n : 2.34E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.69E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.11E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.10E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Min imum concentration : 2.34E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.70E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.47E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.15E

- 04 :ug/l

Median concentration : 7.58E

- 03 :ug/ l

Minimum concentration : 6.45E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.65E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.45E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 9.03E

- 04 :ug/l

Median concentration : 7.49E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 6.37E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 4.70E

- 03 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 4.14E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.58E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.14E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.82E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 9.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 8.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.41E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.49E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.81E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 9.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 8.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.41E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.49E

- 08 : ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.81E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 63

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 9.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 8.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.41E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentrati on : 4.49E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.81E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 9.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 8.68E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 5.41E

- 09 :ug/g dw

M edian concentration : 4.49E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.81E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

M elting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default marina for salt water

Silt concent ration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 3.40E+01 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 1.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 5.00E

- 01 :m/d

### 64

pH : 8.0 :(

- )

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Avera ge windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 400 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 400 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 400 : m

Width of river (y2) : 400 :m

Depth of harbor : 3.5 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 100 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 350 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 3.5 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth se lected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 243420 :m3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

Load : 437.2875 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ship s at berth : 437.2875 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 299

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ship s at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Clas s 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships ( Class 7) : 0

### 65

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application fa ctor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

U nderwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Un derwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Lengt h (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Le ngth (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : Coastal Martina

- LR=6.5



### MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Coastal Marina

- Leaching rate=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

### 66

Run : Default marina

- Swiss marina 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine

9.3

V ersion : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 2:18:20 PM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default marina

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine 9.3

Load : 6.26E+02:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concen tration : 4.18E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 4.03E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.76E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.74E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 5.83E

- 02 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 4.13E

- 01 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 3.98E

- 01 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.72E

- 01 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.71E

- 01 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 5.76E

- 02 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 1.18E

- 01 :ug/g dw

95 % con centration : 1.14E

- 01 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.78E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.74E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.64E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 2.48E

- 06 :u g/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.38E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.62E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.45E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentratio n : 2.48E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.38E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.62E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.45E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

### 67

Maxi mum concentration : 2.48E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.38E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.62E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.45E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 y ears of use

Maximum concentration : 2.48E

- 06 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.38E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.63E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.62E

- 06 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 3.45E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 2.46E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.16E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.35E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.12E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 9.51E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in wa ter

Maximum concentration : 2.43E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 2.14E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 1.33E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 1.11E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 9.39E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 6.94E

- 03 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 6.10E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 3.81E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 3.16E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.68E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 1.46E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.99E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 6.62E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 5.63E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sedimen t after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.46E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.99E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 6.62E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 5.63E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 68

Contaminant concentr ation in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.46E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.99E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 6.62E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 5.63E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Cont aminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 1.46E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 7.99E

- 09 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 6.62E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 5.63E

- 0 8 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coeffici ent : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biolo gical degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photoly tic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default marina

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dis solved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 20.0 :oC

Salinity : 3.40E+01 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 1.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

-

Nett sedime ntation velocity : 5.00E

- 01 :m/d

pH : 8.0 :(

- )

### 69

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

-

Dai ly maximum non tidal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 400 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 400 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 400 :m

Width of river (y2) : 400 :m

Depth of harbor : 3.5 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 100 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1 :m

Density difference : 0.1 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 350 :m2

Depth at harbo ur mouth : 3.5 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 243420 :m 3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Marina 100% Cu

- Omadine 9.3

Load : 625.6575 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 0 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 625.6575 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rat e ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 299

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 0

Number of ships at b erth (Class 6) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Nu mber of moving ships (Class 3) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

### 70

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Cl ass 6) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 20 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 20 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 22.5 :m2

Und erwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference : Coastal Martina

- LR=9.3

### 71 Appendix D

Inputs, parameters and out put results from the MAMPEC Model run for Scenario 4

MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Coastal Harbor

- LR=6.5 μg /cm 2 

### /day

### 72

Run : Default estuarine harbour 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Estuarine Harbour

- 1

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 11:15:33 AM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default estuarine harbour 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Estuarine Harbour

- 1

Load : 6.29E+03:g/d

Result s

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 6.76E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 6.24E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 3.34E

- 02 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.56E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 4.95E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 6.68E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 6.16E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 3.30E

- 02 :ug/l

Median concentration : 2.53E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 4.89E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maxi mum concentration : 1.91E

- 02 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 1.76E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 9.42E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 7.23E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.40E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 ye ar of use

Maximum concentration : 4.00E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.69E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.98E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.52E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.93E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sedi ment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 4.00E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.69E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.98E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.52E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.93E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant conc entration in sediment after 5 years of use

### 73

Maximum concentration : 4.00E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.69E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.98E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.52E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.93E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 4.00E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 3.69E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.98E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.52E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.9 3E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.10E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 9.36E

- 03 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.29E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 4.83E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.59E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.09E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 9.24E

- 03 :ug/l

Average concentration : 2.26E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 4.77E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 2.55E

- 03 :ug/l

Contam inant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 3.11E

- 03 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.64E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 6.47E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.36E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 7.29E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Con taminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 6.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.54E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.36E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 6.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.54E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.36E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentr ation : 1.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

### 74

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 6.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.54E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.36E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 6.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.54E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.36E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2. 86E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.53E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data sheet

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubili ty : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydroly tic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 :1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default estuarine harbour 1

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Pa rticular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon conc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 3.40E+01 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 2.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Frac tion organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.00E+00 :m/d

pH : 7.5 :(

- )

### 75

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 : m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal water level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 1000 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 1000 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 5000 :m

Width of river (y2) : 500 :m

Depth of harbor : 15 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 2500 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1.5 :m

Density difference : 0.4 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal p eriod : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 37500 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 15 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 : m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 60262000 :m3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Estuarine Harbour

- 1

Load : 6285.6365 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 448.9615 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 58 36.675 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 6.5 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 11

Number of ships at berth (Clas s 4) : 5

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 5

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 1

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 2

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 1.8

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0.4

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0.4

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0.1

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0.1

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

### 76

Number of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

Application factor (Class 1) : 0 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Cl ass 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 100 :%

Unde rwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 120 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underw ater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (C lass 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference :



### MAMPEC

- Result Sheet

- Coastal Harbor

- LR=9.3 μg /cm 2 

### /day

### 77

Run : Default estuarine harbour 1 Copper Omadine (default) Default Estuarine Harbour

- 2

Version : MamPec 2.0

Run date : 11/4/2008 1 1:17:25 AM

Memo :

Input

Environment : Default estuarine harbour 1

Compound : Copper Omadine (default)

Emission : Default Estuarine Harbour

- 2

Load : 8.99E+03:g/d

Results

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 9.68E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concen tration : 8.93E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 4.78E

- 02 :ug/l

Median concentration : 3.67E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 7.09E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 9.55E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 8.81E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 4.72E

- 02 :ug/l

Median concentration : 3.62E

- 02 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 7.00E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 2.73E

- 02 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 2.52E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Avera ge concentration : 1.35E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.03E

- 02 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.00E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 5.72E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.83E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.17E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.72E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentra tion : 5.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.83E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.17E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.72E

- 07 :ug/g d w

### 78

95 % concentration : 5.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.83E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.17E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 5.72E

- 07 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 5.28E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 2.83E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 2.17E

- 07 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 4.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Results in surrounding waters

Total concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.60E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.34E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 3.28E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 6.91E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.70E

- 03 :ug/l

Dissolved concentration in water

Maximum concentration : 1.56E

- 02 :ug/l

95 % concentration : 1.32E

- 02 :ug/l

Average concentration : 3.24E

- 03 :ug/l

Median concentration : 6.82E

- 03 :ug/l

Minimum concentration : 3.65E

- 03 :ug/l

Contaminant concentration on suspended solids

Maximum concentration : 4.45E

- 03 :ug/g dw

9 5 % concentration : 3.78E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 9.25E

- 04 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 1.95E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 1.04E

- 03 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 1 year of use

Maximum concentration : 9.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.92E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.94E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 2 years of use

Maximum conce ntration : 9.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.92E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.94E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment after 5 years of us e

### 79

Maximum concentration : 9.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.92E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.94E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Contaminant concentration in sediment aft er 10 years of use

Maximum concentration : 9.34E

- 08 :ug/g dw

95 % concentration : 7.92E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Average concentration : 1.94E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Median concentration : 4.09E

- 08 :ug/g dw

Minimum concentration : 2.19E

- 08 :ug/g dw



### MAMPEC

- Input data she et

Compound

Name : Copper

- pyrithione

Description : Copper Omadine (default)

Molecular mass : 315.85 :g/Mol

Vapor pressure : 5.00E

- 07 :Pa

Solubility : 6.00E

- 02 :g/m3

Octanol

- water coefficient : 2.44E+00 :(

- ) Log (Kow)

Kd : 0.00E+00 :m3/kg

Koc : 4.00E+00 :(

- ) Log(Koc), Koc expressed as l/kg OrganicCarbon

Henry's coefficient : 2.60E

- 03 :Pa.m3/mol

Melting temperature : 0.0 :oC

pKa : 0.0 :(

- )

in water

Biological degradation rate : 1.76E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 3.82E

- 02 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 9.20E

- 01 :1/d

in sediment

Biological degradation rate : 6.30E

- 01 :1/d

Hydrolytic degradation rate : 8.13E+00 :1/d

Photolytic degradation rate : 0.00E+00 : 1/d

Advanced Photodegradation calculation : False

Reference :

Environment

Description : Default estuarine harbour 1

Silt concentration : 35.0 :g/m3

Particular organic carbon conc : 1.0 :g Organic Carbon/m3

Dissolved organic carbon co nc : 2.0 :g/m3

Temperature : 25.0 :oC

Salinity : 3.40E+01 :s.e.

Depth well

- mixed sediment top layer : 2.00E

- 01 : m

Sediment density : 1.000E+03 :kg/m3

Fraction organic carbon in sediment : 3.00E

- 02 :

- /

- Nett sedimentation velocity : 1.0 0E+00 :m/d

pH : 7.5 :(

- )

Chlorophyll : 3.00 :ug/l

### 80

Latitude : 50.00 degrees NH

Background concentrations : 0.00E+00 :ug/l

Average windspeed : 0.00 :m/s

Fraction wind perpendicular to harbour : 0.00 :

- /

- Daily maximum non tidal wat er level change : 0.00 :m

Length of river, not part of harbor (x1) : 1000 :m

Width of harbor (y1) : 1000 :m

Length of harbor (x2) : 5000 :m

Width of river (y2) : 500 :m

Depth of harbor : 15 :m

Length of open harbour mouth (x3) : 2500 :m

Flow : 1 :m/s

Flow of flushing into harbor : 0 :m3/s

Tidal height : 1.5 :m

Density difference : 0.4 :kg/m3

Density difference flushing : 0 :kg/m3

Tidal period : 12.41 :h

Exchange surface : 37500 :m2

Depth at harbour mouth : 15 :m

Height underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Width underwater dam at mouth : 0 :m

Length selected area : 0 :m

Width selected area : 0 :m

Depth selected area : 0 :m

Flow : 0 :m/s

Exchange volume in 1 tidal period : 60262000 :m3

Reference :

Emission

Description : Default Estuarine Harbour

- 2

Load : 8993.2953 :g/d

Loading due to moving ships : 642.3603 :g/d

Loading due to ships at berth : 8350.935 :g/d

Leaching rate ships at berth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Leaching rate ships at be rth : 9.3 :ug/cm2/d

Number of ships at berth (Class 1) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 2) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 3) : 11

Number of ships at berth (Class 4) : 5

Number of ships at berth (Class 5) : 5

Number of ships at berth (Class 6) : 1

Number of ships at berth (Class 7) : 2

Number of ships at berth (Class 8) : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 9 : 0

Number of ships at berth (Class 10) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 1) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 2) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 3) : 1.8

Number of moving ships (Class 4) : 0.4

Number of moving ships (Class 5) : 0.4

Number of moving ships (Class 6) : 0.1

Number of moving ships (Class 7) : 0.1

Number of moving ships (Class 8) : 0

Number of moving ships (Class 9) : 0

Num ber of moving ships (Class 10) : 0

### 81

Application factor (Class 1) : 0 :%

Application factor (Class 2) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 3) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 4) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 5) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 6) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 7) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 8) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 9) : 100 :%

Application factor (Class 10) : 100 :%

Underwater ship area (Class 1) : 20 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 2) : 120 :m2

Under water ship area (Class 3) : 450 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 4) : 3061 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 5) : 5999 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 6) : 9917 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 7) : 14814 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 8) : 22645 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 9) : 27547 :m2

Underwater ship area (Class 10) : 39668 :m2

Ship Length (Class 1) : 0

- 10 :m

Ship Length (Class 2) : 10

- 50 :m

Ship Length (Class 3) : 50

- 100 :m

Ship Length (Class 4) : 100

- 150 :m

Ship Length (Class 5) : 150

- 200 :m

Ship Length (Class 6) : 200

- 250 :m

Ship Length (Class 7) : 250

- 300 :m

Ship Length (Class 8) : 300

- 350 :m

Ship Length (Class 9) : 350

- 400 :m

Ship Length (Class 10) : > 400 :m

Reference :



### Sign

- off Date : 11/18/10

DP Barcode No. : D384160