alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH SACHS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
ROBERT DICARLO,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 22

- 16259

D.C. No. 2:22

- cv

- 00471

- MTL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2023 * *

Before: TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Sachs appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of state child custody

proceeding s . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on

any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058

- 59 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 16259

Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Dismissal of Sachs’s federal constitutional claim was proper because Sachs

failed to allege facts suff

i cient to state a plausible claim

. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Benavidez v. County of San

Diego , 993 F.3d 1134, 11 4 6

- 47 (9t h Cir. 2021) (setting forth requirements to state
a violation of a constitutional right to familial association through judicial

deception)

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining supplemental

jurisdiction over Sach s ’s remaining stat e law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)

(“The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a

[state

- law] claim . . . if . . . the district court has dismissed all claims over which it

has original jurisdiction.”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend

because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home

Loans, Inc. , 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review

and explaining that leave to amend may be denied when amendment would be

futile).

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See3 22

- 16259

Padgett v. Wright
, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

. All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED

.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Eric      Schmidt                                                            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Eric      Schmidt                                                               |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | April      15, 2009                                                             |
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Indonesia (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan  | Feb   | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul  | Aug   | Sep   | Oct   | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----
|2021                                                                                                                              |      |       |     |     |     |     |      |       | 8.07  | 10.12 | 11.08 | 8.20 
|2022                                                                                                                              |      | 10.64 |     |     |     |     |      | 13.54 | 12.22 | 11.36 | 9.21  | 11.16
|2023                                                                                                                              | 6.96 |       |     |     |     |     | 5.95 | 5.53  | 11.16 |       |       |      
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-3612EA

_____________ In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, #2458 * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. * * [UNPUBLISHED]

_____________ Submitted: March 12, 1998

Filed: March 23, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, ROSS, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. This appeal has been submitted on the briefs. Having considered the record and the parties' submissions, we agree with the district court's analysis and conclude that no error of law appears in the district court's order. We thus affirm for the reason s stated in the district court's order without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 12-687.

#### Worthington Cylinder Corp. *v.*Romig.

Ct. App. Ohio, Tuscarawas County. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7692.

#### Nellon *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1322 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1322

   To extend the suspension of duty on certain collapsible umbrellas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 30 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Glenn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the suspension of duty on certain collapsible umbrellas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SELF-FOLDING TELESCOPIC SHAFT, COLLAPSIBLE UMBRELLAS.

    Heading 9902.66.01 (relating to certain collapsible umbrellas) of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by 
striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/94''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by this Act applies with 
respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with 
the appropriate customs officer on or before the 90th day after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, any entry of an article described in 
subheading 9902.66.01 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and
            (2) before the date which is 15 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry occurred on or 
after the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-6970.

#### Bayene *v.*Farmland Foods, Inc.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Howard Smith, Appellant, v Robert Cattani, M.D., Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 32]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila AbdusSalaam, J.), entered October 21, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motion with respect to plaintiffs first cause of action, for medical malpractice, and that cause reinstated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs cause of action for medical malpractice should have been denied since the affirmation of plaintiffs expert, a plastic surgeon, was sufficient to raise factual issues as to whether defendant doctor’s decision to treat plaintiffs baldness with hair transplants was medically appropriate and as to whether the transplants were performed in accordance with prevailing professional standards of professional care *(cf. Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *260
      *Burt v Lenox Hill Hosp.,*141 AD2d 378 [1988]). The triable issues include whether plaintiff, at the time he entered defendant’s care, manifested an abnormal baldness pattern with hair loss in the lower occipital region that should have alerted defendant to the existence of a condition causing hair loss not amenable to treatment by means of hair transplantation or, at least, to the need for a dermatological consultation in advance of any decision to proceed with hair transplant surgery; and as to whether defendant selected donor sites situated high on the back of plaintiffs head, i.e., in areas where hair is often genetically programmed to fall out, and thereby compromised the efficacy of the surgery.

Summary judgment was, however, properly granted dismissing plaintiffs cause of action premised on defendant’s alleged failure to obtain plaintiffs informed consent to the hair transplantation procedures. The documentary evidence establishes that before each of plaintiffs seven surgeries, defendant notified him of the reasonably foreseeable risks and benefits of the surgery, as well as alternatives to the proposed treatment, including no treatment *(see*Public Health Law § 2805-d [1]; *Lynn G. v Hugo,*96 NY2d 306 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Kuwait (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 2,537  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 10.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Rank Group Plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  June 11, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    MIKE
SMITH
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|                     |  |  |  | Name:            
|                     |  |  |  | Title:           
|                     |  | 
|Date:  June 11, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    IAN
DYSON 
|                     |  |  |  | Name:            
|                     |  |  |  | Title:           



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Rank Group plc and will be retained by The Rank Group plc and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



In accordance with the interim guidance for Section 906 certification issued
by the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 in Release No. 33-8212, this certification will not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that The Rank Group plc specifically
incorporates it by reference.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Kentucky Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Kentucky Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.12   | 0.11   | 0.09   | 0.27   | 0.58   | 0.58   | 0.57  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.58   | 0.53   | 0.53   | 0.54   | 0.54   | 0.12   | 0.05   | 0.04   | 0.03   | 0.01  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.01   | 0.00   | 0.00   | 0.08   | 0.12   | 0.28   | 0.30   | 0.09   | 0.16   | 0.12  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.07   | 0.02   | 0.03   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                         
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Illinois Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024