25858 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 90 / Monday, May 11, 1998 / Notices

lll Desire to avoid disclosure to public of

violations

lll Other reason

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lll Don’t know

9. If you circled the ‘‘Uncertainty of

enforcement response’’ reason in the

previous question, please check the subreason(s) and circle the most important subreason:

lll Process for calculating economic

benefit component of penalty is not

precise enough

lllDefinition of ‘‘repeat violations’’ is

unclear

lll Unclear whether entity would meet

10-day disclosure condition

lll Uncertain whether the audit would

meet the standard for environmental

audits

lll Uncertain whether compliance

management system would meet due

diligence standard

lllOther reason

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

10. What relief did you receive under the

Audit Policy?

lllAll penalties eliminated

lll All gravity-based penalties eliminated

with economic benefit penalty

assessment

lll 75% of gravity-based penalties

eliminated with no economic benefit

penalty assessment

lll 75% of gravity-based penalties

eliminated with economic benefit

penalty assessment

lll Penalties reduced under another

authority because the disclosure did not

meet the Audit Policy criteria

lll Penalties not reduced because the

disclosure did not meet the criteria of

any authority

11. How do you view EPA’s response to your

company’s correction of the disclosed

violation?

lll It was reasonable

lll It was too stringent

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

Please explain above or other response:

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lll Don’t know

12. How do you view EPA’s response to your

company’s efforts to prevent recurrence of

the disclosed violation?

lll It was reasonable

lll It was too stringent

Please explain above or other response:

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lll Don’t know

13. Were you satisfied with the outcome of

your company’s self-disclosure?

lll Yes

lll No

lll Somewhat

lll Don’t know

Please explain: lllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

14. What compliance or environmental

improvements, if any, were made possible by

the incentives offered under the Audit

Policy?

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

15. What, if anything, should EPA do to

increase the regulated community’s

awareness of the Audit Policy?

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

16. How can EPA promote the regulated

community’s use of the Audit Policy?

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

17. Would you use the Audit Policy again?

lll Yes, if applicable

lll No

lll Don’t know

18. Would you recommend the Policy to

clients/counterparts?

lll Yes

lll No

lll Don’t know

19. Would you like to see any changes made

to the terms of the Audit Policy?

lll Yes

lll No

lll Don’t know

Please provide any suggested changes here.

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

20. Do you have any other comments or

suggestions about your experience with the

Audit Policy?

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

21. Are you aware of EPA’s ‘‘Final Policy on

Compliance Incentives for Small

Businesses,’’ 61 FR 27984, June 3, 1996?

lll Yes

lll No

The Small Business Policy is intended to

promote environmental compliance among

businesses with 100 or fewer employees

through incentives to participate in

compliance assistance programs or conduct

environmental audits and to subsequently

correct any violations discovered.

22. Would you consider using the Small

Business Policy?

lll Yes

lll No

lll Not applicable because have >100

employees lll Don’t know

Please explain why or why not.

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

Thank you for your participation.

[FR Doc. 98–12428 Filed 5–8–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 19, 1998

at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

PLACE: Conference Room on the Ninth

Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801

‘‘L’’ Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

20507.

STATUS: Part of the meeting will be open

to the public and part of the meeting

will be closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

1. Announcement of Notation Votes,

and

2. Mid-year Operational Reports by

the Office of General Counsel and Office

of Field Programs.

Closed Session

Litigation Authorization: General

Counsel Recommendations

Note: Any matter not discussed or

concluded may be carried over to a later

meeting. (In addition to publishing notices

on EEOC Commission meetings in the

Federal Register, the Commission also

provides a recorded announcement a full

week in advance on future Commission

sessions.) Please telephone (202) 663–7100

(voice) and (202) 663–4074 (TTD) at any time

for information on these meetings. Contact

Person for More Information: Frances M.

Hart, Executive Officer on (202) 663–4070.

Dated: May 6, 1998.

This Notice Issued May 6, 1998.

Frances M. Hart,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 98–12548 Filed 5–7–98; 11:19 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–06–M

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

May 1, 1998.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 90 / Monday, May 11, 1998 / Notices 25859

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before July 10, 1998. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 234, 1919 M St.,

N.W., Washington, DC 20554 or via

internet to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via internet at

jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Approval Number: 3060–0600.

Title: Application to Participate in an

FCC Auction, Supplemental

Continuation Form.

Form Number: FCC 175, FCC 175–S.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit, not-for-profit institutions; state,

local or tribal government.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirement.

Estimated Annual Burden:

Number of

respondents

Estimated

average hours

per response

Estimated

annual burden

hours

FCC 175 ....................................................................................................................................... 10,000 .75 7,500

FCC 175–S ................................................................................................................................... 2,400 .25 600

Estimated Cost Per Respondent:

FCC 175—27,000 hours×$200/

hour=$5,400,000

FCC 175–S 600 hours×$200/

hour=$120,000

Needs and Uses: The FCC Form 175

is used by entities wishing to participate

in Commission spectrum auctions. It

contains information that will be used

by the Commission to determine

whether the applicant is legally,

technically and financially qualified to

participate in the auction as required by

Section 309(j) of the Communications

Act, 47 U.S.C. 309(j). FCC Form 175–S

is a continuation form used to identify

additional licenses or markets for which

the FCC Form 175 applicant wishes to

bid.

Without such information the

Commission could not determine

whether to issue the licenses to the

applicants that provide

telecommunications services to the

public and therefore fulfill its statutory

responsibilities in accordance with the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended. The rules and requirements

are also designed to ensure that the

competitive bidding process is limited

to serious, qualified applicants and to

deter possible abuses of the bidding and

licensing processes.

Federal Communications Commission.

Magalie Roman Salas,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–12407 Filed 5–8–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Submitted to OMB for

Review and Approval

May 4, 1998.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before June 10, 1998. If

you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commission, Room 234, 1919 M St.,

NW., Washington, DC 20554 or via

internet to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collection(s), contact Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via internet at

jboley@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Control No.: 3060–0804.

Title: Universal Service - Health Care

Providers Universal Service Program.

Form No.: FCC Forms 465, 466, 467,

and 468.

Type of Review: Revision of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit; not-for-profit institutions.

Number of Respondents: 18,400

respondents; 52,000 responses.

Estimated Time Per Response: 2.5

hours (avg.).

Frequency of Response: On occasion

and annual reporting requirement.

Cost to Respondents: N/A.

Total Annual Burden: 121,500 hours.