alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1580

To provide that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

does not preempt certain State laws, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 21 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To provide that the Employee Retirement Income Security

Act of 1974 does not preempt certain State laws, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ERISA PREEMPTION RULES NOT TO APPLY TO

4 CERTAIN ADDITIONAL STATE LAWS.

5 Section 514(b) of the Employee Retirement Income

6 Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)) is amended by

7 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

8 ‘‘(9) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—

9 ‘‘(A) any provision of State law to the extent

10 that such provision requires the payment of prevail-
2

•S 1580 IS

1 ing wages, including employee benefits, on public

2 projects and permits any prevailing employee benefit

3 plan contribution or cost requirement of such law to

4 be met by crediting—

5 ‘‘(i) the payment of employee benefit plan

6 contributions or costs,

7 ‘‘(ii) the payment of wages in lieu of such

8 contributions or costs, or

9 ‘‘(iii) the payment of a combination of

10 wages and such contributions or costs;

11 except that this subparagraph shall not be construed

12 to exempt from subsection (a) any such provision to

13 the extent it otherwise mandates the maintenance of,

14 or otherwise regulates the benefits or operations of,

15 any employee benefit plan;

16 ‘‘(B) any provision of State law to the extent

17 that such provision—

18 ‘‘(i) establishes minimum standards for the

19 certification or registration of apprenticeship or

20 other training programs,

21 ‘‘(ii) concerns the establishment, mainte22 nance, or operation of a certified or registered

23 apprenticeship or other training program, or
3

•S 1580 IS

1 ‘‘(iii) makes certified or registered appren2 ticeship or other training an occupational quali3 fication,

4 and does not conflict with any right, requirement, or

5 duty established under this title; or

6 ‘‘(C) any provision of State law to the extent

7 that such provision provides for a mechanics’ lien or

8 other lien, bonding, or other security for the collec9 tion of delinquent contributions to a multiemployer

10 plan.’’.

11 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

13 on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply

14 to matters with respect to which actions are pending on

15 or after such date.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Farhad Moghadam, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2010



/s/ FARHAD MOGHADAMFarhad Moghadam,President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 12-547.

#### Metrish, Warden *v.*Lancaster.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.18   | 0.16   | 0.12   | 0.20   | 0.66   | 0.71   | 0.85  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.22   | 1.61   | 1.38   | 1.52   | 1.53   | 1.58   | 1.49   | 1.81   | 1.60   | 1.68  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.25   | 1.12   | 0.95   | 1.09   | 1.19   | 0.96   | 0.97   | 1.05   | 1.19   | 1.16  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.21   | 1.04   | 1.05   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5866 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5866

**Commission Decision of 15/06/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5866 - SUN CAPITAL / BEAUTY BUSINESS) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.)(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 15.6.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/8498

PUBLIC VERSION C(2010) 4157

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5866 - SUN CAPITAL/ BEAUTY BUSINESS Notification of 18/05/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 137, 27/05/2010, p.28

1. On 18/05/2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Sun Capital Partners V, L.P. part of Sun Capital Partners group of funds ("Sun Capital", USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of part of the Rio Tinto Group ("Rio Tinto", UK) consisting of Alcan Packaging Beauty Business (the "Beauty Business") by way of purchase of shares and assets.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Sun Capital: private equity investment firm managing a number of private equity funds;

- for the Beauty Business: packaging solutions for the beauty industry.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
No. 12-6082.

#### K. F. *v.*Utah.

Ct. App. Utah. Certiorari denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00627-CR

Trial court case number: 1362336

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

The “Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel” filed by appellant’s counsel does not comply 

with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 because it does not indicate that 

the motion was delivered to appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b) (stating, “The motion must be 

delivered to the party―both by certified and by first-class mail―to the party at the party’s last 

known address”); TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(d) (providing that motion for substitution of counsel must 

comply with TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b)). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to STRIKE 

the motion. We ORDER counsel to file a motion for substitution of counsel that complies with 

Rule 6.5 no later 7 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting individually 

Date: August 5, 2013
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov   | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ---
|2011                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 2,910 | 0  
|2012                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2013                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2014                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|                                                                                                                                 
|2015                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0     | 0  
|2016                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |       |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1515

To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 4 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement

Act of 1992.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sea of Okhotsk Fish5 eries Enforcement Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. FISHING PROHIBITION.

7 The Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act

8 of 1992 (title III of Public Law 102–582, 16 U.S.C. 1823

9 note) is amended—
2

S1515 IS

1 (1) in section 302, by inserting the words ‘‘and

2 the Central Sea of Okhotsk’’ after ‘‘Central Bering

3 Sea’’;

4 (2) in section 306, by renumbering paragraphs

5 (2) through (6) as paragraphs (3) through (7), re6 spectively; and

7 (3) in section 306, by inserting the following

8 new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(2) CENTRAL SEA OF OKHOTSK.—The term

10 ‘Central Sea of Okhotsk’ means the central Sea of

11 Okhotsk area which is more than two hundred nau12 tical miles seaward of the baselines from which the

13 breadth of the territorial sea of the Russian Federa14 tion is measured.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit32.2:**

 

#### **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

#### **18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

#### **ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

#### **SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terry L. Troupe, theChief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1)     TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Terry L. Troupe     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Terry L. Troupe         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 4, 2004             |

 

----
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Minnesota Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Minnesota Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.15   | 0.20   | 0.26   | 0.19   | 0.15   | 0.28   | 0.24  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.19   | 0.20   | 0.23   | 0.33   | 0.23   | 0.44   | 0.40   | 0.51   | 0.37   | 0.34  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.49   | 0.37   | 0.63   | 0.61   | 0.37   | 0.55   | 0.65   | 0.53   | 0.60   | 0.77  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.74   | 0.84   | 0.69   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. PEREZ-TOLEDO, R.

997 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/15/2017

CP-40-CR-0001329-2011 (Luzerne)

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings in conjunction with the National Institute of Dental Research 
and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases.

    Name of SEP: Nutrition Academic Awards.
    Date: June 10-11, 1998.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Louise Corman, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7180, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7924, (301) 
435-0270.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of SEP: National Food and Nutrient Analysis Program--
Interagency Agreement Protocol.
    Date: June 12, 1998.
    Time: 9:30 a.m.
    Place: Bethesda Ramada Inn, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    Contact Person: Abby Ershow, M.D. Two Rockledge Center, Room 
9186, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0526.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate an Interagency Agreement 
Protocol.

    Name of SEP: Heart Failure Research: New Approaches to 
Pathogenesis--NHLBI/NIA.
    Date: June14-16, 1998.
    Time: 7:00 p.m.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Hotel, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    Contact Person: Diane M. Reid, M.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7182, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0277.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(b), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12771 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Argentina (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 2,343  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6842.

#### Cloke *v.*Adams et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 1047] denied.