alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Mortgage  Assistance  Center
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31,
2006, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I Dale Hansel,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.




Date: April 17, 2007              By:      /s/ Dale Hensel
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                       Dale Hensel,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                      (principal accounting officer)
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 20, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ FERNANDO BOSQUE MOHÍNO
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Fernando Bosque Mohíno 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 20, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ SAÚL VILLARREAL GARCÍA
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Saúl Villarreal García 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,459
<PP&E>                                          51,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,558
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,992
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,618
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,783
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                       341
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                697
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        <PAGE>

</TABLE>
SDMS Document ID

•11111

2021200

z

§ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 8

999 18TM STREET - SUITE 300

DENVER, CO 80202-2466

Phone 800-227-8917

http://www.epa.gov/region08

December 17, 2003

Ref: 8EPR-SR

MEMORANDUM

To: The File

From: Stan Christensen, Project Manager

Subject: California Gulch Operable Unit 7

All construction activities associated with the Remedial Action for Operable Unit 7 (Apache

Tailings) were completed by December 2002. The Apache Tailings pile was consolidated,

capped, and revegetated. A completion report from Asarco was submitted and approved in

December 2003. The final inspection was conducted on November 7, 2002. The remedy is

operating as intended.

Printed on Recycled Paper
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 152 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 152

 To amend the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act to conform to the 
                          intent of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

 Mr. Pressler introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act to conform to the 
                          intent of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION OF SURCHARGES.

    Section 8 of the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act (31 U.S.C. 
5112 note) is amended by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting 
the following:
            ``(1) the first $18,750,000 shall be promptly paid by the 
        Secretary to the Society to assist the Society's efforts to 
        improve, enlarge, and renovate the Mount Rushmore National 
        Memorial; and
            ``(2) the remainder shall be returned to the United States 
        Treasury for purposes of reducing the national debt.''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECT.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall be deemed to have the same 
effective date as the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act. Any 
surcharges paid into the United States Treasury prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act in connection with the issuance of coins under 
the Mount Rushmore Commemorative Coin Act (which amounts have not been 
otherwise obligated) shall be redistributed by the Secretary of the 
Treasury in accordance with the amendments made by section 1.

                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of John J. Charters III et al., Respondents, v Gary Vegliante et al., Appellants.

[768 NYS2d 617]

— In a *730proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel Gary Vegliante, in his capacity as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Westhampton Dunes and the Incorporated Village of Westhampton Dunes respondents to provide, inter alia, the names, salaries, and civil service classification of employees of the Incorporated Village of Westhampton Dunes pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law *(see*Public Officers Law art 6), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered July 3, 2002, which denied the motion of Gary Vegliante, in his capacity as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Westhampton Dunes and the Incorporated Village of Westhampton Dunes to dismiss the petition and granted the petitioners’ cross motion for leave to amend the petition.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an intermediate order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]), and, in any event, any possibility of taking a direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the proceeding *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; *Matter of Charters v Vegliante, 2*AD3d 730 [2003] [ decided herewith]). Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Tennessee Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Tennessee Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 52     | 73    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 162    | 82     | 88     | 88     | 91     | 90     |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 108    | 103    | 104    | 102    | 96     | 98     | 96     | 88     | 89     | 85    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 85     | 85     | 83     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 131 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 131

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to exclude Nurse officers from 
             the computation of authorized grade strength.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to exclude Nurse officers from 
             the computation of authorized grade strength.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF NURSE OFFICERS FROM COMPUTATION OF AUTHORIZED 
              GRADE STRENGTH.

    Section 523(b) of title 10 of United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as 
        paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
        paragraph (5):
            ``(5) Officers in the Army Nurse Corps, officers in the 
        Nurse Corps of the Navy, and officers in the Air Force 
        designated as nurses.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-7245.

#### Bermudez *v.*Unemployment Compensation Board of Review.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
EX-35 (c)
(logo) National City
       Mortgage

National City Mortgage Co.
A Subsidiary of National City Bank of Indiana
3232 Newmark Drive * Miamisburg, Ohio 45342
Telephone: (937) 910-1200

Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 1820
Dayton, Ohio 45401-1820

Servicer Compliance Statement

RE: See attached for series (Exhibit A)

I, T. Jackson Case, Jr., hereby certify to Bank of America Mortgage Capital
Corporation, that I am a duly elected Executive Vice President of National City
Mortgage Corporation (the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of
the State of Ohio and further as follows:

(i)  A review of the Company's activities as servicer during the immediately
     preceding calendar year (or applicable portion thereof) and of its
     performance under the Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement
     during such period has been made under such officer's supervision, and

(ii) to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the Company
     has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and any applicable
     Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout such calendar
     year (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to
     fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically
     identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the
     status thereof.

National City Mortgage Co.

Certified by: /s/ T Jackson Case, Jr.

Name: T Jackson Case, Jr.

Title: Executive Vice President

Date: 2/14/2007


No one Cares More!


(page)


Exhibit A

V03     BAFC 2006-1
V08     BAFC 2006-2
V12     BAFC 2006-3
V36     BAFC 2006-4
V04     BAFC 2006-A
V50     BAFC 2006-I
837     BAFC 2004-2
X02     BAFC 2004-2
X17     BAFC 2004-5
879     BAFC 2004-B
X57     BAFC 2005-1
X79     BAFC 2005-2
W01     BAFC 2005-3
W38     BAFC 2005-4
W42     BAFC 2005-5
W60     BAFC 2005-6
W94     BAFC 2005-8
X92     BAFC 2005-B
W02     BAFC 2005-E
832     BANC OF AMERICA SEC.
252     BANK OF AMERICA
743     BANK OF AMERICA 2002-3
442     BANK OF AMERICA MCC
747     BANK OF AMERICA MCC
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Delaware Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Delaware Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3,005 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,730  | 2,894  | 3,230  | 2,963  | 2,896  | 3,030  | 3,252  | 3,405  | 3,308  | 3,666 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,945  | 8,444  | 3,058  | 3,393  | 3,336  | 3,349  | 2,940  | 3,258  | 3,479  | 4,365 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,534  | 4,345  | 4,052  | 4,560  | 4,975  | 5,205  | 5,538  | 5,863  | 5,693  | 7,067 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,384  | 6,871  | 7,216  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In the Matter of Chauncy Ramos, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 711]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone, Jr., J.), entered February 24, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law request.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding challenging respon*937dent’s refusal to disclose to him, under the Freedom of Information Law *(see*Public Officers Law art 6) (hereinafter FOIL), a letter sent by the sentencing court to the Board of Parole regarding petitioner. Supreme Court, finding that such letters are exempt from FOIL disclosure *(see Matter of Ramahlo v Bruno,*273 AD2d 521 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 767 [2000]), dismissed the petition. This appeal ensued. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, upon further review, it was determined that the letter was not exempt from disclosure under FOIL because its content was to clarify the disposition of charges against petitioner rather than a recommendation from the sentencing court regarding petitioner’s parole. Inasmuch as petitioner has been mailed a copy of the letter at issue, the appeal must be dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Covington v Cirincione,*307 AD2d 554 [2003]).

Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Christopher R. Geyen, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Restore Medical, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     c) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     d) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Christopher    R. Geyen    Chief Financial Officer     Date: February 28, 2007