Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aF S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 5 9 o f 7 9
C Th e CP T demonstrate s complianc e onl y fo r th e particula r combinatio n o f

waste s incinerate dan dcombustio n condition s a t th e tim e o f

th e test . Eve n though Veolia' s October 201 3 comprehensiv e performanc e test s demonstratedcomplianc e wit h th e HW C MAC T emission s limit s a t each o f th e thre e incinerators , th

e test s cannot

guarantee tha

t Veoli awil l b e i n complianc e wit h th e emission s limit s unde

r differen t combustio n condition s o r whe n burnin g adifferen t

mi x o f wastes . A s discusse dabove , ther e ar e avariet y o f possibl e reason s tha

t th e tes t result s fo r

Unit s 2 an d3 differe ddespit e th e similarit y o f

th e tw o units
. Fo r

simila r reasons , an

y o f th e thre e unit s ma

y be ou t o f complianc e when differen t

mixe s o f wast e ar e incinerate dor

whe n combustio n condition s diffe r fro mtha t achieve ddurin g th

e October

201 3 tests . The temporar y us e o f multi-metal s CEM S wil l allo w Veoli at o ascertain unde

r wha t condition s i t remain s i n compliance
. Further , th e us e ofth e CEM S wil l allo w Veoli at o var y it s feedstrea

mor incinerato r

parameter s i f

i t discover s tha

t i t i s violatin g emission s limit s whil e burnin g differen t combination s o f

wast e unde r varyin g conditions
. 5.3.4
. Availabilit y o f

Multi-Metal s CEM S Multi-metal s CEM S ar

e commerciall y availabl e an dhav e bee n demonstrate dt

o b e reliabl e fo r

measurin g metal emission s fro macommercial hazardou s wast e combustor
. I

n addition , EP A ha

s monitore dside-by-sid e evaluation s o f multi

metal s CEM S wit h EP A Metho d2 9 o f Appendi x A- 8 to 4 0 C.F.R
. Par t 6 0 a t industria l wast

e incinerator s an dfoun dgoo dcorrelatio n betwee n th e tw o methods
. 7 5 Fed
. Reg
. 3196 2 (Jun e 4 , 2010)
. Moreover , though no t specificall y required , EP A consider s multi-metal s CEM S a s a n accepte doptio n fo r

metal s emissio n complianc e i n the recentl y promulgate dmercur y andai r toxic s (MATS ) rule
. 7 7 Fed
. Reg
. 930 3 (Februar y 16 , 2012)
. EP A recently evaluate da t severa l facilitie s acommercia l versio n o f amulti

metal s CEM S (th

e Xact TM multi-metal s CEMS) , whic h i s capabl e o f measurin g u p t o 2 0 or mor e HA P metal s i n rea

l time
. The Xact TM multi-metal s CEM S was develope dan

di s bein g markete db y Coope r Environmental Services , LL C (1018 0 S W Nimbu s Avenue , Suit e J6 , Portland , Portland , Orego n 97223). 5 1 Th e syste m uses reel-to-ree l filte r

tape samplin g technolog y followe db y X-ra y fluorescenc e (XRF ) analysi s o f

metal s i n th

e deposit
. Th e proces s begin s whe n a n isokineti c sub-sample o f

stac k ga s i s take n fro mth

e stillin g chambe

r an ddraw n through a chemically-reactiv e filte r tape . Vapo r

phas e metals , includin g mercury , ar e deposite don th

e reactiv e filter

tap e alon g with th

e particulat

e matter . Th e
Prio r t o Marc h 2013 , th e Xact TM wa s bein g markete db y Pal l Corporatio n (2 5 Harbo r Par k Drive , Por t Washington , Ne w Yor k 11050) ; however , Coope r Environmenta l Service s no w hold s th e exclusiv e manufacturin g an dmarketin g right s fo r th e XactTM
.

VES01730 0Statemen l ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 0 o f 7 9
resultin g deposi t

i s the n automaticall y advance dan danalyze db y XR Ffo r selecte dmetal s whil e th

e next sampl e i s bein g collected
. The XR Fsampl e analysi s techniqu e doe s no t destroy th

e sample , whic h allow s fo r possibl e sampl e archivin g an

dre-analysi s a

t alate r time. 5 2 ' 5 3 Th e Xact TM multi-metal s CEM S ca n measur e u p t o 20 or mor e metal s simultaneousl y includin g arsenic , cadmium , chromium , mercury , an dlead. 5 4 Th e systemreport s analytical result s ever y 1 5 minute s i n th

e unit s o f th e MAC T standard s (pg/dscm). 5 5 Cooper Environmental Service s has als o develope dan dreceive dEP A approva l fo r aQuantitativ e Aeroso l Generato r (QAG) , whic h generate s areferenc e aeroso l fo r calibratin g the multi-metal s CEM S an dfo r performin g relativ e accurac y test audit s (RATAs ) o f

th e multi-metal s CEMS. 5 6Yanc aet al. evaluate dbot

h th e Xact TM an

dth e QA G usin g amodifie dEP A Metho d30 1 a t ahazardou s wast

e combustor

b y comparin g measure dan dreferenc e aeroso l concentrations
. The authors foun dtha

t bot h th e Xact TM an

dth e QA G me

t th e Metho d30 1 validatio n criteri awith precision s an daccuracie s o n th e orde r o f 5 percen t over awid e rang e o f concentrations. 5 7 I n 2006 , El i Lill y an

dCompan y receive dapproval fro mEP A t o us e amulti

metal s CEM S a

s a n alternativ e t

o operatin g paramete

r monitorin g a

t th e El i Lill y Tippecano e Laboratorie s manufacturin g facilit y nea r Lafayette , Indiana
. El i Lill y successfull y installe dandcertifie dth e Xact TM multi-metal s CEMS , an doperate d it fo r a t leas t si x years , o n a5 0 mmBtu/hr rotar y kil n hazardou s (soli dan dliquid ) wast e incinerato r

a t it s facilit y fro m200 5 unti l 20IO. 5 8 El i Lill y use dth e Xact TM

s Hay , K.J. , Johnsen , B.E. , an dCooper , J.A
. (2005)
. X-Ra y Fluorescence-Base dMulti-jMeta l Continuou s Emissio n Monitor : Development
. Fina l Repor t ERDC/CER L TR-05-3 , Januar y 2005
. Availabl e at : http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext7u2/a430237.pd f (accesse dOctobe r

16 , 2012)
. 5 3 Yanca , C.A. , Barth , D.C , Petterson , K.A. , Nakanishi , M.P. , Cooper , J.A. , Johnsen , B.E. , Lambert , R.H. , an d Bivins , B.G
. (2006)
. Validatio n o f Thre e Ne w Method s fo r Determinatio n o f

Meta l Emission s Usin g aModifie d Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Metho d301
. Journa l o f th e Ai r & Wast e Managemen t Association , 56 : 1733

- 1742
. 5 4 Lambert , R
. an dFoster , M
. (2011)
. El i Lilly' s Experienc e Usin g aMulti-Metal s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g System
. Availabl e at : http://events.awma.org/it320 1 l/presentations/SESSION%2014/14

- 3%20Lillv's%20Experience%20with%20Using%20the%20Xact%20Multi-Metals%20Monitoring%20Svstem.pd f (accesse dOctobe r

17 , 2012 )

5 5 Coope r

Environmenta l Service s report s tha t th e Xact TM multi-metal s CEM S ca n b e use dat wast e incinerator s (hazardous , sewage , municipal , medical , industrial) , cemen t kilns , lim e kilns , foundries , coal-fire dpowe r plants , industria l furnace s an dboilers , primar y an dsecondar y meta l smelters , etc . Th e uni t ha s bee n teste d a t

hazardou s wast e incinerators , coal-fire dboilers , we t an ddr y stack s an d5 0 pp maci dgases . See iittp:.//cooperenvironmental.com/wp-cuntent/uploads/2010/ll/20IO-Xact-640-l : 'resentation-at-the-AWMA

Svmposium-on-Air-Oualitv-Measurement-Methods-and-Technology.pd f (Slid e 37)
. I n on e tes t cas e a t acoal-fire d powe r plant , th e Xact TM wa s installe dan doperatin g withi n 2 days
. S f ' http://cooperenvironmental.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/QAG-820-Data-Sheet.pd f

1 7 Yanc ae t

al
. (2006)
. i REl i Lilly' s stac k

gase s a t

th e Tippecano e facilit y average dapproximatel y 8 percen t moistur e conten t

an d14 0 " F ivhil e th e multi-metal s CEM S wa s bein g operated
. However , Coope r Environmenta l Service s ha s assure dEP A tha t tria l test s o n it s CEM S demonstrat e tha t th e uni t

ca n operat e reliabl y at moistur e content s abov e 4 0 percent .

VES01730 1Statemen l ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permit

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Pennittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 1 o f 7 9
multi-metal s CEM S i n conjunctio n with aP M andHC I CEMS. 5 9

- Evoni k Deguss aCorporatio n purchase dth e Tippecano e facilit y i n 201 0 an dcontinue dt o operat e th e PM , HC I and , fo r

abrie f period , th

e multi-metal s CEM S fo r monitorin g complianc e wit h Ih e HW C MACT. 6 1 Cooper Environmental Service s ha s als o recentl y signe dagreements with th e Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit y Managemen

t Distric t (SCAQMD ) an daTexa s compan y t o suppl y tw o multi-metal s CEM S units. 6 2Th e SCAQM D wil l operat e on e multi-metal s CEM S a

t asecondar

y leadsmelte

r i n souther

n Californi afo r

a perio do f a t leas t 1 0 month s beginnin g i n December 2014
. Accordin g t

o Cooper , th e Texa s company expect s t o begi n operatin g th

e CEM S a

t it s facilit y i n Nigeri a i n mid-summer

2014
. Severa l additional multi-metal s CEM S ar e unde r development , includin g severa l effort s focuse do

n laser-base datomi c emissio n spectroscop y (AES) , microwav e AE S an dspark-base dAES. 5 3 However , EP A i s no t awar e tha t any o f thes e other technologie s ar

e cunentl y commerciall y available
. 5.3.5
. Performanc e Specification s fo r th e Multi-Metal s CEM S Althoug h performanc e specification s fo r multi-metal s CEM S have not ye t bee n subjecte dt

o aforma l rulemakin g process , EP A ha s publishe dspecification s an d qualit y assuranc e procedure s fo r th e multi-metal s CEM S i n it s websit e a s OT M 1 6 (Specification s an dTes t Procedure s fo r

X-ra y Fluorescenc e Base dMulti

Metal s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g System s a t Stationar y Sources ) an

d OT M 2 0 (Quality Assuranc e Requirement s fo r X-Ray-Fluorescenc e Base dMulti

Metal s Continuou s Emissio n Monitorin g System s a t Stationar y Sources). 6 4 A s

5 9 Lambert , R
. an dFoster , M
. (2011)
. A s par t o f El i Lily' s experienc e wit h th e multi-metal s CEMS , El i Lill y i n conjunctio n wit h EP A prepare danumbe r o f technica l document s tha t ar e no w poste do n th e OAQP S method s we b sit e a s Othe r

Tes t Methods
. See http://www.epa.eov/ttn/emc/prelim.htm l

s o Th e U.S
. Arm y ha s als o successfull y installe dan devaluate damulti-metal s CEM S o n on e o f it s hazardou s wast e incinerators
. Ha y et

al. (2005)
. EP A als o understand s tha t th e U.S
. Departmen t o f Defens e ha s purchase dthre e Xact TM unit s fo r

us e a t arm y munition s incinerators
. Finally , multi-metal s CEM S ar e a n accepte doptio n fo r metal s emissio n complianc e i n th e utilit y mercur y an dai r toxic s (MATS ) ml e tha t wa s recentl y promulgate db y EPA
. See 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.1O010(j)
. 1 EPA' s Emission s Measuremen t Cente r (EMC) , locate dwithi n th e Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y Plannin g an dStandard s (OAQPS) , ha s als o recentl y evaluate dth e us e o f th e multi-metal s CEM S technolog y fo r ambien t

fencelin e multi

metal s monitorin g fo r complianc e determinations , ambien t healt h exposur e studies , an dfo r locatin g an devaluatin g unknow n source s o f

metal s emissions
. I n 2010-2011 , EM C deploye dth e Xact I M62 5 fencelin e multi-metal s monito r a t tw o site s i n Ohi o i n coordinatio n wit h EP A Regio n 5 , EP A Offic e o f Researc h an dDevelopmen t (ORD ) an dOhi o EPA
. Th e Xact 1 M62 5 report s hourl y ambien t ai r metal s concentration s i n nea r real-time , whic h allow s fo r faste r dat aacquisitio n an ddecisio n makin g ove r conventiona l filter-basedmonitorin g methods
. EPA' s Ohi o studie s sho w excellen t

comparabilit y betwee n th e Xact TM 62 5 an dconventional , filter-based , metal s monitorin g methods
. '' 2Phon e conversation s betwee n EP A an dJoh n Coope r an dKra g Petterson , Coope r Environmenta l Services , date d Marc h 2 4 an d26 , 2014 , respectively
. French , N.B. , an dPriebe , S.J
. (1999 )

M See http://www.epa.tiov/ttn/emc/prelim/otm l 6.pd f an dhttp://www.epa.eov/ltn/emc/prelim/otm20.pdf
.

VES01730 2Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permit

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget, Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 62 o f 7 9
EPA' s historica l practic e indicates , OT M specification s an dprocedure s ca n be use dfo r complianc e purpose s with th e approval o f

the permittin g authority
. A s th e permittin g authorit

y fo r thi s permittin g action , EP A believe s tha t the specification s an

dprocedure s publishe da s OT M 1 6 an d20 ar

e appropriat

e fo r th e multi-metal s CEMS
. I

n addition , thes e specification s an dprocedure s wer

e reviewe dandapprove dby EP A unde r 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.7(f

) a s par t o f th e El i Lill y Alternativ e Monitorin g Petitio n (AMP ) approva l process . EP A guidanc e allow s EP A t o impos e continuou s monitorin g requirement s unde r Titl e V withou t

apromulgate dperformanc e specification , provide dtha t we includ e appropriat

e Q A an dQ C procedure s withi n th e pennit
. See, fo r example , Diann e J
. McNally , Ai r

Toxic s Coordinator , EP A Regio n II I t o Tamera Thompson , Virgini aDepartmen t o f Environmenta l Quality , Ma y 30 , 200 1 (McNall y Memo ) (th

e permittin g authorit

y i s require dt

o incorporat

e int o th e Titl e V permi t acceptabl e perfonnanc e specification s fo r th e continuou s monitorin g syste muse dt o compl y wit h th

e Pul p an dPape r MAC T standard , andma y rel y o n draf t performanc e specification s t o develop suc h performanc e specifications). 6 5 5.3.6
. Measuremen t

o f Berylliu mEmission s EP A recognize s tha

t th e onl y cwrentl y availabl e multi-metal s CEM S tha t woul d mee t EPA' s requirement s i s incapabl e o f measurin g berylliu m emissions
. Becaus e o f

this , EP A has propose damethodolog y i n th e draf t permi t fo r quantifyin g emission s o f metal s fo r

whic h th e multi-metal s CEM S i s incapabl e o f

directin g measuring
. See Conditio n 2.1(D)(l)(i)(ii)
. Th e propose d methodolog y woul drequir e tha t berylliu memission s be quantifie dusin g th e result s o f feedstrea manalysi s an

dth e syste mremova l efficienc y an dexhaus t parameters usedb y Veoli at o estimat e emission s durin g th

e 12-hou r perio duse d t o calculate th

e 12-hou r averag e rollin g average . The propose dmethodolog y fo r measurin g berylliu memission s i s appropriat e sinc e th e propose dtemporar

y multi-metal s CEM S i s not intende dt

o replac e th

e feedstrea manalysi s provisions
. A s alread y discussed , th

e purpos e o f

th e multi

metal s CEM S i s t

o enable EP A t

o establis h aconelatio n between th e feedrate s (andfeedrat

e OPLs ) andthe emissions ; therefore , Veoli awil l continu e t o analyz e it s feedstream s whil e th

e multi-metal s CEM S i s installe dandoperated
. Afte r th e 12-mont h perio dove

r whic h th e multi-metal s CEM S wil l b e operated(unles s tha t perio di s extende db y EPA) , Veoli ahas th e optio n to petitio n EP A t o permanentl y operat e th e multi-metal s CEM S i n lie u o f feedstrea manalysis
. Shoul dVeoli a choos e tha

t option , EP A an dVeoli awoul ddetermin e a t tha t time th e bes t methodolog y fo r

quantifyin g berylliu memission s withou t concunen t

feedstrea

m analysis
. Unti l suc

h time , w e believ e tha

t i t i s appropriat

e t o requir e Veoli at

o

Availabl e at

www.regulations.gov : documen t ID
. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0649-0100
.

VES01730 3Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 3 o f 7 9
calculate berylliu memission s fro mth e berylliu mfeedstrea

manalysi s result s an d usin g acceptabl e conversio n factors
. We expec t tha t Veoli awoul dus e th

e syste m remova l efficienc y fro mth

e las t CP T or othe r EPA-approve dMetho d2 9 test s i n th e calculations
. Also , becaus e Veoli ai s require dt o instal l an

doperat e continuou s monitorin g system s (CMSs ) fo r purpose s o f

demonstratin g complianc e wit

h th e maximu mtemperatur

e an dflowrat e OPLs , w e expec t tha t Veoli awil l hav

e continuou s flo w an

dtemperatur

e dat atha t i t ca n us e i n th

e calculations
. 5.4
. Othe r Supplementa l Monitorin g Provision s Include d i n th e Permi t 5.4.1
. Emission s Calculatio n Methodolog y [Conditio n 3.1(C) ] Veolia' s Titl e V permit

establishe s periodi c monitorin g i n anumbe r o f condition s a s summarize dbelow
. I n general , th e periodi c monitorin g requirement s include , a s appropriate , regula

r o r periodi c performanc e testing , recordkeepin g andwor k practic e provisions
. I

n situation s wher

e continuou s emission s monitoring , performanc e testin g or

use o f specifi c emission s estimatio n software , i s not required , EP A expects Veoli at o rel y on emissio n factor s t o calculat e emissions
. Whethe r o r no t th e permi t specific s th

e emissio n factor s t

o be used , Veoli ai s require dt o documen

t th e emissio n factor s i t

uses , includin g ademonstratio n o f their appropriatenes s t

o th e specifi c emissio n unit s fro mwhic h emission s ar e bein g calculated
. I n al l situations , EP A expect s Veoli at o follo w th

e followin g hierarchy when selectin g th

e appropriat

e methodolog y fo r

calculatin g emissions : 1
. Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g CE M dat afro mth e stationar

y source ; 2
. Performanc e test

datafro mth

e stationar

y source ; 3
. Manufacturer' s emission s performanc e guarantee ; 4
. CE M dat

afro masimilar

stationar y sourc e o r

sources ; 5
. Performanc e tes

t dat afro masimila r

stationar y sourc e o

r sources ; 6
. Industry-derive demissio n factors ; 7
. Emissio n factor s publishe db y EP A i n th e lates t versio n o f

AP-42; 6 6 8
. Engineerin g judgment
. See, generally , Introductio n t o AP-42 , Volum e I , Fift h Editio n - Januar y 1995 (AP-4 2 Introduction ) a

t 2- 5 andFigure 1
. Veoli ashoul ddocumen t i n it s record s tha t i t followe dthi s hierarchy
. Note tha t Veolia' s choic e o f

emissio n calculatio n methodolog y base

do n th e abov e hierarch y doe s no t preclude an

y person , suc h a s EPA , th e public , or

othe r regulator

y agencies , fro musin g othe r credibl e evidenc e htlp://www.epa,gov/ttn/chiei7ap4 2

VES01730 4Statemen t o f Basi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 4 o f 7 9

t o establis h complianc e or noncomplianc e with applicabl e requirement s a s provide dby th

e Act
. See 4 2 U.S.C
. § 741 3 an d6 2 Fed
. Reg
. 831 4 (Februar y 24 , 1997)
. Unde r th e above hierarchy , Veoli ashoul dtrea t AP-4 2 emissio n factor s (i f available ) a

s th e las t resor t before usin g engineerin g judgmen t t o estimat e emissions
. I

n situation s wher

e representativ e source-specifi c dat acannot b e obtained , EP A believe s tha t emission s informatio n fro mequipmen t vendors , particularl y emissio n performanc e guarantee s or actual tes t

dat afro msimilar equipment , i s abette

r sourc e o f

informatio n fo r

calculatin g emission s tha n a n AP

42 emissio n factor
. AP-4 2 Introductio n a t 3
. I f AP-4 2 emissio n factor s must b e used , A-rate dAP-4 2 emissio n factor s shoul db e considere dbefor e th e lower rate d emissio n factors
. Whil e i t ma y no t be necessar

y i n som e situation s t

o revie w eac h individua l dat

asourc e tha

t EP A relie dupo n i n developin g th e AP-4 2 emissio n factors , suc h revie w ma y b e appropriat

e i n case s wher

e EP A has reporte dsignifican t

source-to-sourc e variabilit y i n th e measuredemissio n rates . Becaus e AP-4 2 emissio n factor s represen t a n averag e o f

emission s fro m differen t sources , i t

i s possibl e tha

t som e o f th e source s evaluate db y EP A i n developin g th

e AP-4 2 emissio n factor s bein g considere dhave significantl y differen t emission s characteristic s tha n Veolia
. Therefore , i

t i s crucia l tha

t Veolia' s record s includ e aclea r justificatio n o f

the appropriatenes s o f

th e selecte d AP-4 2 emissio n facto r

fo r the specifi c emissio n uni t bein g evaluated/' 7 5.4.2
. Testin g Requirement s fo r NOx , VO M an dSO

2 Emission s fro mthe Incineratio n Unit s Conditio n 2.1(A)(6 ) limit s NO x emission s fro mUnit s 2 , 3 an d4 t o 4. 0 tpy , 4. 0 tp y an d61. 6 tpy , respectively
. Conditio n 2.1(A)(2 ) limit s SO 2 emission s fro m Unit s 2 , 3 and4 t

o 7. 7 tpy , 7. 7 tp y an

d50.7 6 tpy , respectively
. Conditio n 2.1(A)(5)(b ) limit s VO M emission s fromUnit s 2 , 3 an d4 t o 0. 9 tpy , 0. 9 tpy an d 3. 1 tpy , respectively
. Thes e limit s ar e fro mConstructio n Permit s 8710002 4 an d 88010001
. I

n addition , Condition s 2.1(A)(1 ) an d2.1(A)(5)(a ) contai n emission s limitation s fo r

visibl e emission s (opacity ) andVO M fro man y emissio n unit , respectively
. Thes e limit s ar c fro mth e Illinoi s SIP
. Althoug h EP A acknowledge s tha t complianc e wit h th

e HW C MAC T requirement s assure s tha t NOx , SO 2 andVO M emission s wil l generall y b e

" A s EP A ha s previousl y stated : "Befor e simpl y applyin g AP-4 2 emissio n factor s t o predic t emission s fro mne w o r propose dsources , o r

t o mak e othe r

source-specifi c emissio n assessments , th e use r shoul drevie w th e lates t literatur e an dtechnolog y t o b e awar e o f circumstance s tha t

migh t caus e suc h source s t o exhibi t emissio n characteristic s differen t

fro mthos e o f

other , typica l existin g sources . Car e shoul db e take n t o assur e lha t th e subjec t

sourc e typ e an d design , controls , an dra w materia l inpu t ar e thos e o f

th e source(s ) analyze dt o produc e th e emissio n factor
. Thi s fac t shoul db e considered , a s wel l a s th e ag e o f th e informatio n an dth e user' s knowledg e o f technolog y advances. " AP

- 4 2 Introductio n at

4
.

VES01730 5Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 65 o f 7 9
minimize dfro mth

e incineratio n units , EP A believe s i t i s necessar

y t o periodicall y documen t th e actua l emission s o f

thes e pollutant s s o a

s t o documen

t complianc e wit h th e numerica

l emissio n limit s fo r

thes e pollutants
. Therefore , EP A ha s proposedadditional emission s testin g requirement s fo r NOx , SOa , opacit

y an d V O M emission s i n Conditio n 2.1(D)(7)(b ) o f th e draf t permit
. Thes e requirement s stat

e tha t durin g th e confirmatory performanc e test s require db y Condition s 2.1(D)(8 ) an

d(10) , Veoli ashal l als o measur e emission s o f

NOx , SO2 , visibl e emission s (opacity ) an dVO M t o documen

t complianc e with th

e NOx , SO2 , visibl e emission s an dVO M limitations , respectively
. EP A has include dth e appropriat

e test method s i n Condition s 2. 1 (D) ( 14)(i ) through (1)
. Confinnator y performanc e test s ar e conducte dapproximatel y onc e ever y fiv e year s on eac

h incinerato r

to demonstrat

e complianc e with th

e dioxin/fura n emissio n standards , an

dt o evaluat e th e perfonnanc e o f

continuou s monitorin g systems fo r

dioxin/furans
. Becaus e th e NOx , SO2 , opacit

y an dVO M emission s testin g woul db

e conducte dalon g wit h th e dioxin/fura n tests require db y th e HW C MACT , Veoli aca

n demonstrat

e complianc e with th

e NOx , SO2 , opacit

y andVO M emission s limit s whil e i t bum s th e sam e typ e o f waste , andunde

r th e sam e operatin g conditions , a s use dto demonstrat

e complianc e with th

e dioxin/fura n emissio n standards
. 5.4.3
. Visibl e Emission s Observation s fo r Materia l Processin g Area s (Condition s 2.2(D)(4 ) an d2.2(E)(2) ! Conditio n 2.2(A)(4 ) o f

th e permi t limit s emission s o f

"smok e o r othe r particulat e matter " fro man

y emissio n uni t

t o n o greate

r tha n 30 % opacity
. T o demonstrat e complianc e with thi s requirement , Conditio n 2.2(D)(4 ) require s Veoli at o visuall y survey unit s MP1 , MP 2 an dth e Lab Pack

Repac k are aeac h da y fo r th e presenc e o f visibl e emission s o

r fugitiv e emissions
. I f

emission s ar

e observed , th

e permi t require s appropriat

e conectiv e action
. I f

th e conectiv e actio n doe s no t eliminat e th e visibl e emissions , the

n Veoli ai s require dt

o conduc t

opacit y observation s usin g EP A Metho d9
. I f any ofth e visibl e emission s observation s indicate visibl e emission s greate

r tha n 20 percen

t opacity , Veoli amus t

conduc t dail y visibl e emission s observations , fo r 3 0 minutes , o f

th e emissio n point

i n questio n unti l 2 consecutiv e dail y observation s indicate visibl e emission s o f 2 0 percen t opacity o r less
. I f th e Metho d9 visibl e emission s observations , o r i f 2 consecutiv e dail y observations , indicat

e visibl e emission s o f

20 percent

opacit y or less , th e Permittee shal l conduc t

weekl y visibl e emission s observation s o f th e emissio n point fo r 3 additional weeks
. Conditio n 2.2(E)(2 ) require s Veoli at o kee p record s associate dwit

h th e visua l survey s andMetho d9 observations
. I t i s ver y unlikel y tha

t th e repackagin g o f

material s wil l caus e opacit y greate r tha n 30 % becaus e th

e waste s tha

t ar e bein g repackage dar

e i n enclose dcontainers
. Th e proces s typicall y involve s openin g th e container s briefl y whil e th e wast e i s

VES01730 6Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions
. L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Page 6 6 o f 7 9 repackaged , an

dtake s plac e i n a

n enclosur

e tha t minimize s th

e impac t fro mwind
. EP A believe s thi s stage

dapproach t

o assessin g complianc e wit h th e opacit y limi t i s appropriate , give n th

e infrequenc y o f

visibl e emission s i n th

e material s processin g area . 5.4.4
. Calculatio n o f

VO M Emission s fro mMateria l Processin g Area s [Conditio n 2.2(E)(3) ] Conditio n 2.2(A)(3 ) provide s tha t n o perso n shal l caus e or allo w th e discharg e o f mor e tha n 3. 6 kg/h

r ( 8 lb/hr ) o f

organi c material int o th

e atmospher

e fro man

y emissio n unit
. T o demonstrat e complianc e wit h thi s requirement , Conditio n 2.2(E)(3 ) o f

th e 200 8 permi t

require dVeoli at

o calculat

e VOM/HA P emission s fro munit s MP-1 , MP- 2 an dth e Lab Pac k

Repac k usin g th e most recen t versio n o f th e TANK S program. 6 8 EP A ha dbelieve dtha

t th e majority o f

th e wast e processin g occunin g i n th e wast e processin g areas too

k plac e withi n th

e drum s an dcanister s an

dtherefore , usin g TANK S t o determine th

e VO C an

dHA P emission s base don th

e siz e o f th e container s andth

e liqui dconten

t woul dyiel d th e most reliabl e information
. However , accordin g t o Veolia/' 9 container s tha t are receive dandstore di n MP-1 , MP- 2 an dth e Lab Pac k

Repack ar e close dwith ali d or cove r whic h allow s n

o volatil e compound s t

o escape . Onc e th

e container s ar

e receive dinto th

e MP-1 , MP- 2 an dth

e La b Pac k

Repac k buildings , the

y ar e hel d ther e unti l th e wast e i s transfene dfo r

processin g eithe

r withi n th e buildin g o

r directl y t o th e incinerato r

feeds
. Container s ar

e onl y openedt

o sampl e an

d proces s th

e contents . Th e processin g consist s o f placin g th

e wast e fro ma containe r eithe r into ope n trough s throug h whic h th e wast e move s through sizin g activitie s an

di s repacke dint o fee dcontainers ; or directl y int

o fee d containers
. Th e wast

e i n th e trough i s open t

o th e atmospher

e o f th e building
. A s suc h constituent s i n th

e wast e volatiliz e int

o th e buildin g atmospher

e an dar e emitte dthrough th

e buildin g exhaust
. I n recognitio n o f

th e natur e o f th e wast e processin g operation s performe di n th e materia l processin g areas , EP A i s proposin g i n th e renewa l permit t o requir e Veoli at o calculat e VO M an dHA P emission s fro munit s MP-1 , MP- 2 an dth e La b Pack Repack usin g th e Emissio n Inventor

y Improvemen

t Program's 7 0surfac e evaporatio n mode l fo r

calculatin g emission s fro msurfac e evaporatio n o f VO M fro mope n o r partiall y covere dmixin g tank s durin g coatin g mixin g operations , Method s fo r

Estimatin g Ai r

Emission s fro mPaint , Ink , an dOthe r Coatin g Manufacturin g Facilities , Volum e II : Chapter 8 (Februar

y 2005 ) a t 8.4-2 2

mTANK S i s acompute r softwar e progra mtha t estimate s VO C an dHA P emission s fro mfixed

- an dfloating-roo f storag e tanks
. It

i s base do n th e emissio n estimatio n procedure s fro mChapte r 7 o f AP-42
. 1,9See emai l fro mKath y Strubber g t o Davi dOgule i date dApri l 3 , 2014
.

, nTh e Emissio n Inventor y Improvemen t Progra mwa s ajoin t effor t b y th e Stat e an dTerritoria l Ai r Pollutio n I'rogran i Administrators/Associatio n o f Loca l Ai r

Pollutio n Contro l Official s (STAPPA/ALAPCO ) an dEPA
.

VES01730 7Slatemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Pemii t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 7 o f 7 9 (Equatio n 8.4-22). 7 1 Th

e surfac e evaporatio n mode l estimate s th e amoun t o f constituent s volatize dbase d o n th e volatilit y o f

th e differen t

wast e constituent s an d th e ai r flo w acros s th

e expose d surfac e o f

th e wast e an d i t i s mor e appropriate tha n TANK S fo r

calculatin g emission s fro memissio n unit s tha t behave lik e spills. 7 2Thus , although EP A generall y consider s th e TANK S progra

mt o b e reliabl e fo r

estimatin g VO M emission s fro menclose d storag e tanks , th e surfac e evaporatio n mode l i s mor e conservativ e tha

n TANK S fo r

estimatin g emission s fro mVeolia' s wast

e processin g areas . EP A i s proposin g t

o continu e t

o requir e tha t Veoli aus e TANK S o

r th e equation s an d algorithm s specifie di n Chapte r 7 o f AP-4 2 fo r

estimatin g an

y VOC s emitte d fro man y enclose d storag e tank s locate d i n MP-1 , MP- 2 an d th e La b Pac k Repack
. 5.4.5
. Visibl e Emission s Observation s fo r the Dru mCrushe r

[Condition s 2.3(D ) an d 2.3(E)(3) ] Conditio n 2.3(A)(3 ) limit s emission s o f "smok e o r othe r particulat

e matter " fro m an y emissio n uni t

t o n o greate r tha n 30 % opacity
. T o demonstrat e complianc e wit h thi s requirement , Conditio n 2.3(D ) require s Veoli at o visuall y survey th

e drumcrushe

r each da y fo r the presenc e o f

visibl e emission s o r

fugitiv e emissions
. I f emission s ar

e observed , th

e permi t require s appropriat

e correctiv e action
. I f

th e correctiv e actio n doe s no t eliminate th

e visibl e emissions , then Veoli ai s require d t o conduc t

opacit y observation s usin g EP A Metho d9
. I f an y o f th e visibl e emission s observation s indicate visibl e emission s greate r tha n 2 0 percen t opacity , Veoli amus t

conduc t dail y visibl e emission s observations , fo r 3 0 minutes , o f

th e emissio n poin t

i n questio n unti l 2 consecutiv e dail y observation s indicat e visibl e emission s o f

2 0 percen

t opacity o r

less
. I f th e Metho d9 visibl e emission s observations , or

i f 2 consecutiv e dail y observations , indicate visibl e emission s o f 20 percen t opacit y or less , th e Permitte e shal l conduc t weekl y visibl e emission s observation s o f

th e emissio n point

fo r 3 additional weeks
. Conditio n 2.3(E)(3 ) require s Veoli at

o kee p record s associate d wit

h th e visua l survey s and Metho d9 observations
. I t i s ver y unlikel y tha

t crushin g drum s wil l caus e opacit y greate r tha n 30 % becaus e th

e drum s ar

e empt y an d woul dno t

generat e enough dust

particle s t

o violate th e opacit y standar d when th

e drum s ar

e crushed
. EP A believe s thi s stage d approach t

o assessin g complianc e wit h th e opacit y limi t i s appropriate , give n th e unlikelihoo do f

visibl e emission s fro mth e dru mcrusher
.

7 1 http://www.epa.gov/ttri/chief/eiip/techreport/volume02/ii0 8 feb2005.pdf
. 7 2Moreover , EP A ha s recentl y determine d tha t th e TANK S mode l i s no t reliabl y fiinctiona l o n computer s usin g certai n operatin g system s suc h a s Window s Vist ao r Window s 7
.

VES01730 8Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 6 8 o f 7 9
5.4.6
. Calculatio n o f

VO M Emission s fro mth e Dru mCrushe r [Condition s 2.3(E)(1 ) an d(2) [ Conditio n 2.3(E)(2 ) require s Veoli at o calculate VO M emission s fro mth e dru m crushe r usin g a n emission s facto r

o f 0.022 1 pound s VO M pe r drumcrushed
. Thi s V O M emissio n facto r

i s base do n a

n analysi s o f

actua l throughpu

t dat acollecte d b y Veoli asinc e th

e initia l Titl e V permi t

wa s issued , includin g th e numbe r o f container s crushed , th

e typ e o f volatil e constituent s likel y t o be i n containe

r residu e andth

e amoun t o f thes e volatil e constituent s processe do n a n annua l basis
. The VO M emissio n facto r o f 0.022 1 pound s VO M pe r dru mcrushe d assume s tha

t th e drumresidu e contain s th e mos t prevalent

organic s a

t th e concentration s presen

t i n the wast

e receive ddurin g 2007

- 2011. 7 3 T o enable calculatio n o f hourl y an dannua

l emissions , Veoli amus t maintai n record s o f

th e tota l numbe r o f drum s crushe d(drums/hour anddrums/year

) fo r th e drumcrusher
. EP A believe s thi s i s areasonabl e procedur e fo r estimatin g actua

l V O M emission s fro mth

e dru mcrusher
. A s provide db y Conditio n 4.2 2 o f th e pennit , an

y perso n ma

y als o us e othe

r credibl e evidenc e t

o establis h complianc e o r noncomplianc e with applicabl e requirements
. 5.4.7
. Periodi c Replacemen t o f Carbo n i n th e Carbo n Adsorptio n Syste m [Conditio n 2.4(D)(4) ] T o ensur e th e integrit y o f th e carbo n adsorptio n bed , Conditio n 2.4(D)(4 ) o f th e permi t require s Veoli at

o replac e th

e carbo n be dwithi n 36 5 day s o f operatio n fo r ahig h BT U tan

k an d3 year s o f

operatio n fo r

alo w BT U tank
. Thi s provisio n supplement s Conditio n 2.4(D)(3 ) whic h require s Veoli at o replac e th

e existin g carbo n with fres h carbo n immediatel y whe n carbo n breakthroug h i s indicated
. 5.4.8
. Inspectio n Requirement s fo r th e Submerge dLoadin g Pipe s [Conditio n 2.4(D)(6) 1 Thi s provisio n require s Veoli at o inspec t th e presenc e an dconditio n o f th e submerge dloadin g pipe s fro mth e to p durin g th

e quarterl y inspection s andl o conduct aphysica l inspectio n o f th e submergedloadin g pipe s ever y 5 years . EP A believe s thi s provisio n i s necessar y t o assur e complianc e with Conditio n 2.4(A)(5 ) whic h require s tha t eac h affecte dliqui dwast

e storag e tan

k b e equippe d wit h apermanen

t submerge dloadin g pipe
.

7 3 Th e origina l permi t require dVeoli at o calculat e VO M emission s fro mth e dru mcrushe r usin g a n emissio n facto r o f 0.091 4 l b VO M pe r

dru mcrushed
. Tha t emissio n facto r

wa s calculate dbase do n th e assumptio n tha t onl y methano l residu e i s i n th e container s t o b e crushe dan dtha t methano l i s th e onl y VO M release da s th e container s ar e crushed
. Thi s wa s arathe r conservativ e assumptio n becaus e methano l ha s ahighe r vapo r pressur e tha n mos t

o f th e volatile s foun di n th e containe r residues
. Veoli arequeste dtha t EP A updat e th e VO M emissio n facto r a s discusse d here
.

VES01730 9Stalemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 69 o f 7 9

5.4.9
. Visibl e Emission s Observation s fo r th e Bul k Fee dBuildin g [Conditio n 2.5(D)(3 ) an d2.5(E)(3) ] Conditio n 2.5(A)(4 ) limit s emission s o f "smoke o r

othe r particulate matter " fro m an y emissio n unit

t o no greate

r tha n 30 % opacity
. T o demonstrat e complianc e wit h thi s requirement , Conditio n 2.5(D)(3 ) require s Veoli at o visuall y survey th e bulk fee dbuildin g eac

h da y fo r th e presenc e o f

visibl e emission s o

r fugitiv e emissions
. I f

emission s ar

e observed , th

e permi t require s appropriat

e correctiv e action
. I f

th e correctiv e actio n doe s not eliminate the visibl e emissions , the n Veoli ai s require dt

o conduc t

opacity observation s usin g EP A Metho d9
. I f an y o f th e visibl e emission s observation s indicate visibl e emission s greate r tha n 20 percen t opacity , Veoli amus t

conduc t dail y visibl e emission s observations , fo r 3 0 minutes , o f

th e emissio n poin t

i n questio n unti l 2 consecutiv e dail y observation s indicat e visibl e emission s o f

2 0 percen

t opacity or

less
. I f th e Metho d9 visibl e emission s observations , or i f 2 consecutiv e dail y observations , indicate visibl e emission s o f

2 0 percen t opacity o

r less , Veoli ai s require dt o conduc t weekl y visibl e emission s observation s ofth e emissio n point fo r 3 additional weeks
. Conditio n 2.5(E)(3 ) require s Veoli at o kee p record s associate dwit h th e visua l survey s an

dMetho d9 observations
. I t i s unlikel y tha

t operation s i n th

e bul k fee dbuildin g wil l caus e opacit y greate r tha n 30 % sinc e i t

i s totall y enclosed
. EP A believe s thi s stagedapproach t o assessin g complianc e with th e opacit y limi t i s appropriate , give n th

e unlikelihoo d o f visibl e emission s fro mth e bul k fee dbuilding
. 5.4.10
. Requirement s tha t Ensur e Tota l Enclosur e fo r th e Bul k Fee dBuildin g [Conditio n 2.5(D)(6) ] Condition s 2.5(A)(1)(b ) an d2.5(D)(4 ) contai n requirement s t o ensur e tha t th e bulk fee dbuildin g i s totall y enclosed
. Fo r th e purpos e o f

assurin g complianc e wit h thes e requirements , Conditio n 2.5(D)(6 ) require s Veoli at o maintai n a

n averag e facia l velocity o f a t leas t 20 0 ft/mi n flowin g into th e bul k fee dbuilding' s enclosur e a t al l natura

l draf t opening s i n th

e building
. Veoli amust annuall y demonstrat

e th e facia l velocit y accordin g t o Procedure T - Criteri afo r an d Verificatio n o f

aPermanen

t o r Temporar

y Tota l Enclosure , 4 0 C.F.R
. § 52.741 , Appendi x B
. EP A believe s thi s periodi c monitorin g requirement , i n conjunctio n wit h th e requirement s o f

Conditio n 2.5(D)(4) , assure s tha t Veoli ai s maintainin g a tota l enclosur e o f th e building
.

VES01731 0Statemen t o f Basi s fo r DRAF T Till e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Page 7 0 o f 7 9
5.4.11
. Supplementa l Recordkeepin g Requirement s fo r th e Bul k Fee dBuildin g [Conditio n 2.5(E)(2) ] T o help verif

y complianc e wit h th

e applicabl e requirements , EP A i s requirin g Veoli at o maintai n record s accordin g t o Conditio n 2.5(E)(2)
. Thes e record s woul dprovid e informatio n on VOM/HA P emissions , amoun t o f waste s processed , maintenanc e an drepair activit y an

dleve l o f pressur e maintaine dinsid e ofth e building
. EP A i s proposin g t o requir e tha t Veoli acalculate VOM/HA P emission s fro mwast

e processin g operation s locate da t th e bul k soli dwast

e storag e facilit y (bul

k fee dbuilding ) usin g th

e Emissio n Inventor

y Improvemen

t Program' s surfac e evaporatio n model
. See discussio n i n Sectio n 5.4.4 , above
. I n addition , Veoli awil l us e th e mos t recen t versio n o f

th e TANK S progra

mor th e equation s an

dalgorithm s specifie di n Chapter 7 o f AP-4 2 t o calculat e VOM/HAP s emitte dfro many enclose dstorag e tank s locate di n th e bul k fee d building
. 5.4.12
. Monitorin g an dRecordkeepin g Requirement s fo r th e Gasolin e Storag e Tan k [Condition s 2.6(D ) an d(E) ] Condition s 2.6(A)(1 ) and(2 ) prohibi t Veoli afro mcausin g o r

allowin g th

e transfe r o f gasolin e fro man

y deliver y vesse l into an y stationar

y storag e tan

k unles s th e tan k i s equippe dwith asubmerge dloadin g pipe
. EP A believe s i t i s necessar

y fo r Veoli at o maintai n record s tha

t documen t th e presenc e o f

apermanen

t submerge d loadin g pipe
. Also , t

o ensur e tha t th e submergedloadin g pip e an dth e storag e tan k ar e designe dan

doperate ds o a

s t o limi t VOM/IIA P emission s durin g th e transfe r o f gasoline , EP A believe s i t i s appropriat

e t o requir e Veoli at

o maintai n record s o f

inspections , maintenanc e an drepair fo r th e storag e tan

k an dsubmerge d loadin g pipe
. Conditio n 2.6(E ) require s suc h recordkeeping
. The draf t permit als o include s th

e requirement s o f

3 5 IA C 219.585 , Gasolin e Volatilit y Standard s fo r

th e Metr o Eas t

Area , i n Condition s 2.6(A)(3 ) through (5). 7 4 T o monito r complianc e with thes e requirements , EP A i s proposin g t o includ e periodi c monitorin g provision s i n Condition s 2.6(D)(1 ) through (5)
. I n particular , Conditio n 2.6(D)(1 ) o f th e draf t permi t require s Veoli at

o demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h th e 7. 2 pound s pe

r squar e inc h Rei dvapo r

pressur e limi t in Conditio n 2.6(A)(4 ) b y annuall y samplin g an danalyzin g fo r

Rei dvapor

pressur e

MEffectiv e Januar y 28 , 2013 , th e Illinoi s Pollutio n Contro l Boar drepeale dth e requirement s o f 3 5 IA C 219.58 5 fro mstat e rules
. IEP A ha s submitte dt o EP A areques t t o revis e it s SI P t o remov e th e repeale dprovisions ; however , E P A ha s no t

ye t acte do n tha t

request . EP A i s proposin g t o retai n th e repeale dprovision s i n Veolia" s permi t unti l suc h atim e tha t

thos e provision s ar e remove dfro mth e Illinoi s SIP
. I f prio r t o issuin g th e fina l permit , EP A grant s IEPA' s reques t

t o remov e th e repeale dprovision s fromit s SIP , EP A wil l remov e th e repeale dprovision s fro mthi s pemii t whe n i t

issue s th e fina l permit
. EP A wil l follo w th e appropriat e permi t reopening/revisio n procedure s i n 4 0 C.F.R
. § 71. 7 i f

EP A grant s IEPA' s reques t t o remov e th e repeale dprovision s fro mit s SI P afte r th e fina l permi t i s issued
.

VES01731 1Statemen t o f Basi s lo r DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 1 o f 7 9
th e gasolin e i n th

e affecte dtank
. Pursuan t t o Conditio n 2.6(E)(4) , Veoli amus t maintai n record s o f

al l samplin g an

danalyse s i t

conducts
. I

n addition , Veoli a must maintai n fo r

thre e year s record s of , among othe r things , th

e Rei dvapo r pressur e o f eac h shipmen

t o f gasolin e loade dint o th

e gasolin e storag e tan

k pursuan t t o Conditio n 2.6(E)(5)
. Becaus e Veoli ai s require dt o recordth

e Rei d vapo r pressur e o f each shipment

o f gasolin e loade dinto th

e gasolin e storag e tank , EP A believe s tha

t th e additiona l annua

l samplin g an dtestin g requirement s fo r Rei dvapor

pressur e ar e sufficien t

t o assur e complianc e with th

e vapor pressur e limit
. 5.4.13
. Complianc e wit h th e Opacit y an dOthe r Numerica l Limit s fo r

th e Boile r [Condition s 2.7(C)(2) , 2.7(D)(1) , 2.7(D)(2)(e) ] Condition s 2.7(A)(1 ) throug h (3 ) contai n numerica l limit s fo r th e boiler , includin g SI P limit s i n Condition s 2.7(A)(1 ) an d(3 ) an dconstructio n permit limit s i n Conditio n 2.7(A)(2)
. Becaus e emission s fro maboile r ar e directl y relate dt

o th e amoun t andtyp e o f

fue l burne di n th

e boiler , th

e permi t als o include s limit s on natura l ga s consumptio n (see Conditio n 2.7(C)(2) ) alon g wit h requirement s t

o track andrepor

t natura l gas usag e (see Conditio n 2.7(E))
. T o demonstrat e complianc e wit

h thes e numerica l limits , th e Permitte e must

compl y with anumber o f wor k practic e andoperational requirement s a s wel l a s performanc e testin g requirement s fo r

NOx , C O an dopacity
. Conditio n 2.7(D)(1 ) require s Veoli ato demonstrat e complianc e wit

h th e opacity limi t by conductin g annua

l opacity observation s usin g EP A Metho d9
. I n addition , Conditio n 2.7(C)(1 ) provide s tha t natura l ga s wil l b e th e onl y fue l fired i n th e boiler , andVeoli amus t conduc t annua l tune-up s pursuan

t t o Conditio n 2.7(D)(2)
. Becaus e natura l gas-fire dboiler s generall y emit ver y lo w level s o f particulat e matter, i t

i s unlikel y tha

t visibl e emission s fro mth e boile r woul deve r excee d30 % opacity
. Therefore , a n annua l opacit y observatio n usin g EP A Metho d9 i s sufficien t

t o demonstrat

e complianc e with th

e 30 % opacit

y limi t fo r thi s unit
. Pursuan t t o Conditio n 2.7(D)(2)(e) , Veoli amust measur e th e concentration s o f bot h C O an dNO x i n th

e effluen t

strea meac h tim e i t conduct s th

e annua l tune-up s require db y th

e permit
. Thes e measurement s ma y be taken usin g portabl e C O an d NO x analyzers
. Becaus e C O an dNO x typicall y hav e a n invers e relationshi p i n boiler s (i.e. , C O i s typicall y highes t whe n NO x i s lowest) , EP A believe s tha t measuremen

t o f bot h C O an dNO x durin g th e tune-up s wil l help assur e continuou s complianc e wit h the C O an dNO x emissio n limits
. I n addition , Veoli a i s required , pursuan

t t o Conditio n 2.7(D)(4) , t o conduc t

performanc e test s fo r

C O an dNO x fro mth

e affecte dboile r

a t afrequenc y o f

no les s tha

n onc e ever

y 5 year s t o demonstrat

e complianc e with th

e C O an dNO x emissio n limit s i n Conditio n 2.7(A)(2)
. EP A believe s thi s frequenc y o f testin g i s adequat

e give n

VES01731 2Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Penni t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 2 o f 7 9
tha t previou s testin g conducte do n th e affecte dboile r

ove r th e pas t fou r years ha s producedC O concentration s tha t ar e significantl y lowe

r tha n th e applicabl e C O limits. 7 5 Al l C O an

dNO x measurements woul dbe recordedan dreporte dt

o EP A accordin g t

o Condition s 2.7(E)(1)(c) , 2.7(E)(1)(d ) an d2.7(E)(2)
. 5.4.14
. Periodi c Monitorin g Requirement s fo r Insignifican t

Emissio n Unit s IConditio n 2.10(C) ] Condition s 2.10(B)(1 ) throug h (3 ) contai n requirement s tha t appl y t o insignifican t emissio n unit s an

dactivities , includin g numerica l emissio n limit s containe di n th e Illinoi s SI P fo r

proces s emissio n unit s (Conditio n 2.10(B)(1) ) an dorgani c materia l emissio n unit s (Conditio n 2.10(B)(2))
. Pursuan t t o 4 0 C.F.R
. § 71.6 , th e permit must includ e monitorin g requirement s sufficien t t o assur e complianc e wit h thes e requirements
. Becaus e th

e insignifican t

emissio n unit s specificall y identifie di n th e permi t ar e expecte dt

o hav e ver y lo w emission s compare dt o th e applicabl e emissio n limits , EP A believe s th

e appropriat

e means o f

monitorin g complianc e fo r thes e unit s i s through recordkeepin g requirements
. Specifically , EP A i s requirin g tha t Veoli a maintai n arecor

do f it s emission s calculations , throughput , inspection , maintenanc e an

drepair log , an dothe r informatio n necessar

y t o demonstrat

e complianc e wit

h th e applicabl e requirement s andclassificatio n o f th e unit s a s insignifican t

emission s units
. Veoli amus t submi t tha t recor dt o EP A accordin g t o th e genera l recordkeepin g an dreportin g schedul e i n th e permit
. 5.5
. Streamlinin g Pursuan t t o 4 0 C.F.R
. § 71.6(a)(3)(i)(A) , i f tw o o r mor e monitorin g or

testin g requirement s appl y t

o th e sam e pollutan t

fro mth e sam e emissio n unit , EP A ma y allo w a permitte e t

o compl y with astreamline dse t o f monitorin g o

r testin g provisions , provide d tha t th e specifie dmonitorin g or testin g i s adequat

e t o assur e complianc e a

t leas t t o th e sam e exten t a s th e monitorin g or

testin g applicabl e requirement s tha t ar e no t include di n th e penni t a s th e resul t ofth e streamlining
. EP A i s proposin g t o streamlin e requirement s i n Conditio n 2.1(C)(7)(g ) pertainin g t o requirement s fo r

awast e fee dcutof

f interloc k systeman dsensors a

s containe di n constructio n pennit s 83120053 , 87100024 an d 8801000 1 an

dth e HW C MACT
.

7 5 Tes t dat aprovide db y Veoli aindicat e tha t averag e C O concentration s i n th e boile r exhaus t wer e les s tha n 0.5 par t pe r millio n (ppm) , correcte dt o 3 % oxygen , i n measurement s conducte do n Jun e 25 , 200 9 (0.0 6 ppm) , Jun e 17 , 201 0 (<0.0 1 ppm) , Jun e 9 , 201 1 (<0.0 1 ppm ) an dJun e 8 , 201 2 (0.1 3 ppm)
. See Veoli aPermi t Applicatio n (Apri l 8 , 2013 ) a t 9-10
.

VES01731 3Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 3 o f 7 9
The wast e cutof f interloc k sysle mrequire d b y constructio n permit s 83120053 , 8710002 4 an d8801000 1 mus

t be constructe d and operate d s o a s t o preven t introductio n o f

wast e into th e incineratio n unit

whe n an y ofth e followin g event s have occurred : (a ) Primar y chambe r temperatur

e belo w 160

0 °F ; (b ) Secondar

y chambe r temperatur

e belo w 180

0 °F ; (c ) Primar

y o r secondar y chambe

r abov e atmospheri c pressure ; (d ) Spra y drye r adsorbe r inle t greate r tha n 220 0 °F ; (e ) Spra y drye r adsorbe r outle t greate r tha n 40 0 ° F o r

belo w 37 0 °F ; (f ) Lo w liqui dleve l i n lim e slurry hea d tank ; (g ) Lo w makeu

p wate r pressur e into slurr

y hea t tank ; (h ) Baghous e tub e shee

t pressur e dro p greate r tha n 1 0 inche s wate

r column (w.c) ; (i ) Combustio n stac

k ga s flo w les s tha

n 5,000 actua

l cubi c fee

t pe r minut e (acfm ) o r greate r tha n 15,000 acfm ; (j ) Oxyge n concentratio n les s tha n 6% b y volume ; (k ) Carbo n monoxid e concentratio n greate r tha n 50 0 ppm ; (1 ) Carbo n monoxid e concentratio n greate r tha n 5 0 pp mfo r

3 minutes ; (m ) Tota l hydrocarbo n concentratio n greate r tha n 10 0 ppmcorrecte d t

o 1 % oxygen ; (n) HC I concentratio n greate r tha n 10 0 pp mfo r

1 hour ; (o ) Opacit

y greate r tha n 10% ; (p ) Primar

y fue l pressur

e belo w 3 0 psig ; (q) Combustio n ai r

pressur e belo w 1 0 inche s w.c ; (r ) Primar y burne r failure ; (s ) Secondar

y burne r failure ; (t ) Emergenc y stac

k open ; an d (u) OPL s a

s establishe d base d upo n evaluatio n o f actua l operatio n an

d measure d emission s durin g atria l burn
. See Constructio n Permi t

8710002 4 (Uni t

3) , Conditio n 4 , an

d Constructio n Permi t 8801000 1 (Uni t

4) , Conditio n 4. 7 6 Conversely , th

e HW C MAC T require s eac h subjec t facilit y t o have i n plac e afunctionin g syste mtha t immediatel y an

d automaticall y cuts of f

th e hazardou s wast

e fee d unde

r certai n conditions , als o know n a s the Automati c Wast

e Fee d Cut-Of

f (AWFCO ) system . See 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.1206(c)(3)
. Thi s systemi s triggered :

7 6 Availabl e a t

www.regulations.gov : Docke t ID
. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280
. Constructio n Permi t 8312005 3 (Unit s 2 an d 3 ) include s additiona l trigge r event s suc h a s induce d draf t fa n failure , quenc h wate r flo w belo w 10 0 gallon s pe r minut e (gpm) , Ventur i scrubbe r wate r belo w 3 7 gpm , pressur e dro p acros s Ventur i scrubbe r les s tha n 2 1 inche s w.c , scrubbe r

p H les s tha n 6 , flu e ga s temperatur e enterin g th e scrubbe r greate r tha n 18 0 °F , an d los s o f slurr y flo w t o spra y drye r

adsorber
. See Conditio n 5 o f Constructio n Permi t 83120053
. EP A i s no t proposin g t o streamlin e thes e trigge r

events .

VES01731 4Stalemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Pennittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Page 7 4 o f 7 9 (a ) whe n any ofth e followin g ar e exceeded : OPL s specifie dunde r 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.1209 ; a

n emissio n standar

dmonitore db y aCEMS ; andth e allowabl e combustio n chambe

r pressure ; (b ) whe n th e spa n valu e o f

an y CM S detector , except

aCEMS , i s me

t or exceeded ; (c ) upon malfunctio n o f

aCM S monitorin g a

n OP L specifie dunde

r 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.120 9 or

a n emissio n level ; o r (d ) whe n any componen

t o f th e AWFC O fails
. Th e constructio n permit s an dth e HW C MAC T contai n differen t criteri afo r

whe n th e fee dshoul db

e cu t off , makin g i t

difficul t t o compar e eac h individua l criteri afo r triggerin g th

e wast e fee dcutof

f interloc k syste mwit h th

e criteri afo r

triggerin g th

e AWFC O system . Althoug h th e criteri aar

e different , th

e tw o applicabl e requirement s ar e clearl y monitorin g th

e incineratio n units ' operatio n a s amean s t

o determine whe

n th e unit s ma y b e ou t o f compliance
. Becaus e th e AWFC O systemrequire db y th e HW C MAC T ca

n be configure dt

o incorporate al l o f

th e triggerin g event s identifie di n th e constructio n permits , EP A believe s tha t complianc e wit

h th e AWFC O requirement s o f 4 0 C.F.R
. Par

t 63 , Subpar

t EEE , wil l assur

e complianc e wit h th

e lis t o f require dmonitor s i n constructio n permit s 83120053 , 8710002 4 and88010001
.

VES01731 5Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 5 o f 7 9


### 6.0 . ENVIRONMENTA L JUSTIC E CONSIDERATION S I n 2011 , EP A publishe dPla n E J 2014 , EPA' s roadma p fo r integratin g E J int o it s programs , policie s an dactivities
. Pla n E J 201 4 ha s three objectives : 1 ) Protect healt h an dth e environmen t in overburdene dcommunities ; 2) Empower communitie s t

o tak e actio n t o improv e thei r

healt h an denvironment ; and3 ) Establis h partnership s wit h local , state , tribal , andfedera l government s an dorganization s t

o achiev e health

y an dsustainabl e communities. 7 7 One focu s are ao f Plan E J 201 4 i s "Considerin g Environmental Justic e i n Permitting." 7 8 EPA' s goal i s t o enable overburdene dcommunitie s t o hav e ful l an dmeaningfu l acces s t o th e permittin g proces s an

dt o develop permit s tha

t addres s E J issue s t

o the greates t

exten t practicabl e under

existin g environmenta

l laws
. Overburdene dcommunitie s ar e communitie s tha

t potentiall y experienc e disproportionat

e environmenta

l harms an dris k

a s aresult o f cumulativ e impact s or

greate r vulnerability t

o environmenta

l hazards. 7 9 Veoli ai s locate di n Eas t

St
. Louis , a

n are awit h overburdene dcommunities , an dth e sourc e i s o f significan t

publi c interest
. Approximatel y two-third s o f al l person s livin g withi n thre e mile s o f Veoli a(6 4 percent

) ar e minorities , an

done-thir d(3 3 percent

) liv e belo w th

e federa l povert y level. 8 0Tabl e 1 1 compare s th e rac e distributio n i n th

e vicinit y o f

Veoli at o th e stat e andnationa l distributions
. Figur

e 5 show s th

e breakdow n o f

househol dincom

e withi n thre

e mile s o f

Veolia , base don 2000 U.S
. censu s data
. A s show n i n Figur e 5 , below , abou t one-hal f o f al l household s withi n three mile s o f

Veoli ahav

e annua l househol dincome o f

$25,00 0 or

less
. Tabl e 11
. Rac e Distributio n Withi n 3 Mile s o f Veolia
. Rac e Percen t o f tota l populatio n withi n 3 mile s Illinoi s U.S
. Whit e 36 % 71.5 % 72.4 % African-America n 59 % 14.5 % 12.6 % Asian / Pacifi c Islande

r 2 % 4.6 % 5.0 % America n India

n 0 % 0.3 % 0.9 % Other rac e 0 % 6.7 % 6.2 % Multiracia l 3 % 2.3 % 2.9 % *Statistic s represen t

residentia l population , b y 200 0 Censu s Bloc k Group , fro mEJView : http://epamapl4.epa.gov/ejmap/enlrv.htm l

11 See Plan EJ

2014: Considering Environmental Justice in Permitting - Implementation Plan. Availabl e at : http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ei/resources/policv/plan-ej-2014/plan-ei-permitting-201 1 -09.pdf
. See also "EP A Activitie s T o Promot e Environmenta l Justic e i n th e Penni t Applicatio n Process, " Notic e o f Availabilit y o f Propose dRegiona l Action s t o Promot e Publi c Participatio n i n th e Permittin g Proces s an dDraf t Bes t Practice s fo r Permi t Applicant s Seekin g EPA-Issue dPermits ; Reques t fo r Comments , 7 7 Fed
. Reg
. 38052
.

, sId.

1 9 7 7 Fed
. Reg
. 38052
.
s o U.S
. Censu s 200 0 an d201 0 data , b y Bloc k Group
. Availabl e throug h EPA' s EJView : http://epamapl4.epa.KOv/e i map/e n try , htm l

VES01731 6Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Pemii t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Pennittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dale Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 6 o f 7 9

11 %

29% Les s tha n $15,00 0 B$15,00 0 - $25,00 0 $25,00 0 - $50,CO O $50,00 0 - $75,00 0 Greate r tha n $75,00 0
Figur e 5
. Incom e o f

household s withi n 3 mile s o f Veolia
. (Source: U.S
. Censu s 200 0 data , b y Bloc k Group )

Figur e 6
. Percentag e o f populatio n surroundin g Veoli alivin g belo w th e federa l povert y level
. (Source: U.S
. Censu s 200 0 data , b y Bloc k Group )

VES01731 7Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 7 o f 7 9
A significan t

portio n o f

th e populatio n livin g directl y nort h o f Veoli ai n Eas t

Sain t Louis , and acros s th e river t o th e wes t ofth e facilit y i n portion s o f Saint Loui s i s livin g belo w the federal povert y level
. See Figur e 6 (marke r show s th

e locatio n ofth e facility)
. Compare dt o th e nationa l average o f

12.4 % o f individual s livin g belo w th e povert y level , i t i s clea r tha t th e bloc k

group s nea r Veoli ahave amuc h higher percentag e o f

individual s livin g belo w th e federa l povert

y leve l tha n th e nationa l average. 8 1 Th e Titl e V progra

mitsel f doe s no t gran t EP A the authorit

y t o creat e new limit s o r

othe r requirement s base do n thes e concerns . A s previousl y discussed , th e Titl e V permittin g program codifie dunder

4 0 C.F.R
. Par

t 7 1 provide s EP A wit h th e authorit y to incorporate int o permit s "al l operationa

l requirement s an dlimitation s tha t assur e complianc e wit h al l applicabl e requirements " andmonitorin g "sufficien t t o yiel dreliabl e dat

afro mth e relevant tim e perio dtha t ar e representativ e o f

the source' s complianc e wit h th e permit " tha

t wil l assur

e complianc e wit h al l requirement s ofth e Act
. Throug h thi s propose dpermi t renewal action , EP A i s incorporatin g monitorin g requirement s necessar y t o assur e complianc e wit h al l applicabl e requirements
. EP A believe s tha

t complianc e wit h th

e HW C MAC T requirement s wil l hel p protec t th e ai r qualit y aroun dVeolia , whic h wil l benefi t the entir e community
. T o ensur

e complianc e wit h th e feedrat e limit s i n the permit , EP A has include di n th e Titl e V permi t

additiona l an dspecifi c monitorin g requirement s fo r heav y metal s (mercury , arsenic , beryllium , cadmium , chromiu man d lead)
. Th e propose dmonitorin g requirement s ar e base do n site-specifi c condition s a t th e Veoli a facilit y an dwil l help protec t huma n health an dth

e environment

fromth e consequence s o f emission s o f

mercur y an dothe

r metal s b y providin g furthe r assuranc e tha

t Veoli awil l not

excee d it s permitte dlimits
. See section s 5. 2 an d5. 3 fo r adiscussio n o f

the additional monitorin g requirement s include di n the permit
. EP A define s E J a

s providin g fai r

treatmen t an dmeaningfu l participatio n i n environmenta l decisio n making
. W e believ e tha t the proces s w e ar

e followin g wit h thi s Titl e V permittin g actio n provide s opportunit y fo r meaningfu l participatio n i n environmental decisio n making
. Specifically , EP A has fulfille dan dexceede dCA A publi c notic e requirement s fo r Titl e V permittin g b y holdin g a45-da y publi c commen

t perio dan dapubli c hearin g fo r the draf t permit
. Th e specifi c publi c participatio n opportunitie s fo r thi s permittin g actio n ar e describe di n afac t shee t tha t accompanie s thi s draf

t permi t {see Docke t

ID
. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280)
. W e believ e tha

t mor e transparenc y an ddialogu e ca n lea dt o bette r permi t outcome s fo r

th e communit

y a s wel l a s permi t applicants
.

U.S . Censu s 200

0 data . Availabl e through : http ://factfinder2 .census.gov/faces/nav/isfypaees/index.xhtm l

VES01731 8Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Permittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : October

10,201 4 Pag e 7 8 o f 7 9 

### 7.0 . MAJO RCHANGE S FRO M TH E 2008 PERMI T
7 .1 . Revisio

n o f OPL s an

d Additio n o

f Monitorin

g Requirement

s fo r Metal

s an d Othe r Pollutant

s A s previousl y discussed , today' s permi t include s multi-metal s CEM S requirement s an d supplementa

l feedstrea

manalysi s procedure s fo r mercury , LV M an dSVM
. Th e permi t als o include s ne w OPL s require db y th e HW C MAC T base do n performanc e test s conducte db y Veoli ai n Octobe r 2013
. Pleas e se

e detaile ddiscussion s i n section s 4.2.3 , 4.2.4 , 5. 2 and5. 3 o f

thi s Statemen

t ofBasis
. EP A has als o propose di n Conditio n 2.1(D)(7)(b ) emission s testin g requirement s fo r NOx , SO2 , opacit

y an dVO M emission s fromeach incineratio n unit
. Th e ne w requirement s stat

e tha t durin g th e comprehensiv e performanc e tests require db y Condition s 2.1(D)(8 ) an d(10) , Veoli ashal l als o measur e emission s o f

NOx , S02 , opacit y an dVO M t

o documen

t complianc e wit h th

e NOx , SO2 , visibl e emission s an dVO M limitations , respectively
. EP A ha s include dth e appropriat

e tes t method s i n Condition s (2.1)(D)(14((i ) throug h (1)
. See sectio n 5.4. 2 fo r amor e detaile ddiscussion
. 

### 7 .2 . Remova

l o f Case-By-Cas

e MAC T Determinatio

n for th e Boiler O n Septembe

r 13,2004 , unde

r th e authorit

y o f Sectio n 112(d) ofth e Act , 4 2 U.S.C
. § 7412(d) , EP A promulgate dnationa l emissio n standard s fo r HAP s fo r

ne w an dexistin g industrial/commerciayinstitutiona l boiler s an dproces s heaters , 4 0 C.F.R
. Par t 63 , Subpar

t DDDD D (th

e Boile r MACT)
. O n Jun e 19,2007 , th e Unite dState s Court

o f Appeal s fo r th e Distric t o f Columbi aCircui t

vacate dan dremande dthos e standards
. See Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA, 48 9 F.3 d125 0 (D.C
. Cir
. 2007)
. Veoli awa s subjec t to th e Boile r MAC T prio r

to it s vacatu r

b y the D.C
. Circuit
. A s aconsequenc e o f the Boile r MACT' s vacatur , pursuan t t o Sectio n 112(j ) ofth e Act , EP A wa s require dto includ e i n th

e 200 8 Titl e V permi t

fo r Veoli alimitation s o n HA P emission s tha t EP A determined , o n acase-by-cas e basis , to b e equivalent t o the limitation s tha

t woul dappl y to th e affecte dboile r

i f an emissio n standar

dha dbeen promulgate di n atimel y manne r unde r Sectio n 112(d

) ofth e Act
. Thus , i n th

e 200 8 permit , EP A establishe dpursuant to Sectio n 112(j ) o f

the Act , acarbo n monoxid e emissio n standar d(as asurrogat

e fo r organi c HAP ) fo r

Veolia' s natura

l gas-fire dboile r

o f 10 0 part s pe r

millio n b y volum e o n adr y basi s correcte dt

o 3 percent

oxygen . See Conditio n 2.7(A)(1 ) ofth e 200 8 permit. 8 2 Afte r EP A issue dthe 200 8 permit , o n Marc h 21,2011 , EP A promulgate dne w nationa l emissio n standard s fo r

HAP s fo r

ne w an dexistin g industrial/commercial/institutiona l

aDocke tID : EPA-R05-OAR-2008-023 5

VES01731 9Statemen t ofBasi s fo r

DRAF T Titl e V Permi t

No
. V-IL-1716300103-2014-1 0 Pennittee : Veoli aE S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , Sauget , Illinoi s Dat e Issued : Octobe

r 10 , 201 4 Pag e 7 9 o f 7 9
boiler s an

d proces s heaters , 4 0 C.F.R
. Par t 63 , Subpar

t DDDDD
. Veolia' s boile r i s subjec t t o thos e standard s an d EP A has propose d t o incorporat

e eac h applicabl e provisio n fro m4 0 C.F.R
. Par

t 63 , Subpar

t DDDDD , int o the Titl e V permit
. See Condition s 2.7(C ) throug h (E)
. Pursuan

t to 4 2 U.S.C
. § 7412(j)(6) , i f the Administrato r

promulgate s a

n emissio n standar

d tha t i s applicabl e t

o th e majo r sourc e prior

t o th e dat e o n whic h a permi t applicatio n i s approved , th e emissio n limitatio n i n the permi t shal l reflec t

th e promulgate d standar

d rathe r tha n the case-by-cas e MAC T emissio n limitation
. Becaus e th

e Administrato r

ha s promulgate d astandar d tha t applie s t o Veolia' s boile r unde r Sectio n 112(d

) o f th e Act , EP A i s proposin g t o remov e fro mth e permi t the case by-cas e MAC T determinatio n tha t i t made i n the 200 8 permi t an d t o incorporate int o the permi t th e applicabl e provision s fro m4 0 CF.R
. Par t 63 , Subpar

t DDDDD
. 

### 7.3 . Incorporatio

n o f Applicabl

e Requirement

s for th e Emergenc

y Generator

s Veolia' s tw o diese l fuel-fire demergenc y generators , each wit h asit e ratin g o f

les s tha n 11 2 kW , ar

e subjec t t o th e NESHA P fo r

Stationar y Reciprocatin g Interna

l Combustio n Engine s (RICE) , 4 0 C.F.R
. Par t 63 , Subpar

t ZZZZ
. See 4 0 C.F.R
. § 63.6585
. Thi s federal rul e establishe s nationa l emissio n limitation s an d operatin g limitation s fo r HA P emitte d fro mstationar

y RIC E locate d a

t majo r and are asource s o f

HA P emissions
. 7 3 Fed
. Reg
. 360 3 (Januar

y 18,2008)
. Fo r

emergenc y generators o f the siz e owne d and operated b y Veolia , 4 0 C.F.R
. Par t 63 , Subpar

t ZZZZ , include s work

practic e an d operationa

l requirement s tha

t wil l minimiz e HA P emission s fromthe generator s whil e they ar e bein g operated
. Consistent

wit h the CAA' s mandat e t o includ e al l applicabl e requirement s i n th e permit , EP A ha s incorporate d al l ofth e applicabl e provision s o f 4 0 C.F.R
. Par

t 63 , Subpar

t ZZZZ , into Veolia' s renewal permit
.

VES01732 0

# VES017321-017448.pd f

## ©vgou a eNVIRONMGNTA L SERVICE S 

### January 28 , 201 4 Vi a FedE x Attn : Complianc e Tracker , AE-17 J Ai rEnforcemen t an d Complianc e Assuranc e Branc h Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Regio n 5 7 7 W
. Jackso n Blvd. , AE-17 J Chicago , I L 6060 4
RE : Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C

. 163121AA P 4 0 CF R Part 6 3 - Subpart EE E Nationa l Emissio n Standard s fo rHazardou s Ai rPollutant s fro m Hazardou s Wast e Combustor s Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Report s an d Notificatio n o f Complianc e (NOC ) Complianc e Tracker , Pursuan t t o th e requirement s of 4 0 CF R 63.1200 , subpar t EEE , Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C , hereb y submit s th e Performanc e Tes t Report s fo rIncinerator s 2 , 3 an d 4 an d th e Notificatio n o f Complianc e (NOC)

. Th e NO C document s complianc e wit h th e emissio n standard s an d continuou s monitorin g syste m requirements , an d identifyin g operatin g parameter s define d i n 4 0 CF R 63.120 9 an d 63.1219
. Veoli a i s no w complyin g wit h al l operatin g requirement s specifie d i n thi s NOC

. Th e Performanc e Tes t Report s detai l complianc e wit h thes e standards
. I certif y unde rpenalty o f la w tha t thi s documen t an d al l attachment s wer e prepare d unde rm y directio n o rsupervisio n i n accordanc e wit h a syste m designe d t o assur e tha t qualifie d personne l properl y gathe ran d evaluat e th e informatio n submitted
. Base d o n m y inquir y o f th e perso n o rperson s wh o manag e th e system , o rthos e person s directl y responsibl e fo r gatherin g th e information , th e informatio n submitted , i s t o th e bes t of m y

Wt Mobile Avenue , Sauget , I L 62ZD 1 (€18)271-280

4 www.veoliaes.co

m

### Qveou A ENVIRONMENTA L SERVICE S 

### Complianc e Tracke r Januar y 28 , 201 4 Pag e 2
knowledg e an d belief , true , accurate , an d complete
. I a m awar e that ther e ar e significan t penaltie s fo rsubmittin g fals e information , includin g th e possibilit y o f fin e an d imprisonmen t fo rknowin g violations
. Upo n revie w of thi s submittal , shoul d th e Agenc y hav e a nee d fo radditiona l informatio n o rquestions , pleas e contact Denni s Warcho l a t (618 ) 271-280 4 o rvi a e-mai l at dennis.warchol@veolia.co m o rm e a t (618 ) 271-280 4 o rvi a e-mai l a t doug.harris(5)veolia.com

. Sincerely , Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C

. Dou g Harri s Genera l Manage r Att
. cc : Mr
. Georg e Czerniak , Director , Ai ran d Radiatio n Divisio n USEP A Fil e

# 7 Mobil e Avenue , Sauget

, I L 6220 1 (618 ) 271-280

4 www.veoliaes.co

m

VES01732 2

# UR

S !ffl |

4 0 CF R §6 3 Subpart EE E Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Repor ' Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 2 Fixe d Heart h Incinerato r - Uni t 3 Rotar y Kil n Incinerato r - Uni t 4

Veoli a E S Technica l Solutions , L.L.C .

7 Mobil e Avenu e Sauget , I L 62201

Prepare d by : UR S Corporatio n 9400 Ambergle n Blvd . Austin , T X 78729

Januar y 28,201 4 UR S Corporatio n 940 0 Ambergle n Boulevar d Austin , T X 7872 9 P.O

. Bo x 20108 8 Austin , T

X 78720-108 8 Tel : 512. 4 54.479 7 Fax : 512.454.880 7 www.urscorp.co m 

## fo r

Prepare d for :

VES01732 3

### Tabl e o f Contents Pag e 1. 0 Introductio n • 1- 1 1. 1 Incinerato

r Overvie w 1- 2 1. 2 Test

Objective s - 1- 3 1.3 Test

Protoco l Summar

y 1- 4 1. 4 CP T Schedule < 1- 9 1.5 Summar

y o f Result s 1-1 0 1. 6 Repor

t Organizatio n 1-1 0 2 . 0 Proces

s Operations.... . 2 - 1 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w 2- 1 2. 2 Proces s Operating Dataan dWast e Feedrate s 2- 6 2.2. 1 Uni t

2 2- 6 2.2. 2 Uni t

3 2- 6 2.2. 3 Unit

4..
. 2- 7 2. 3 Spikin g o f

Metal s an

dChlorin e .2- 7 3 .0 Sampling , Analysis , an d Monitorin g Procedure s 3 - 1 3. 1 Samphn

g Location s an

dProcedure s 3- 1 3.1. 1 Liquid s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 1 3.1. 2 Solid s Samplin g Procedure s 3- 6 3.1. 3 Stac

k Gas Samphng Procedure s 3- 6 3.1.3. 1 Sample Por

t Location s 3-1 0 3.1.3. 2 EP A Method s 2 an d4 (Flowrat

e an dMoisture ) .3-1 0 3.1.3. 3 EP A Metho d5 (PM ) 3-1 0 3.1.3. 4 Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A (HC1/C1 2 ) • 3-1 1 3.L3. 5 EPAMethod2 9 (Metals ) 3-1 1 3.1.3. 6 SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A (Dioxins/Furans ) 3-1 2 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 , C O an d0 2 ) 3-1 3 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s : 3-1 3 3.2. 1 Compositio n an

dPhysica l Parameter

s Analysi s .....3-1 4 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s -.3-1 4 3.2. 4 HCVC1 2Analysi s 3-1 4 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s 3-1 5 3. 3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s 3-1 5

ii i

VES01732 4

### Tabl e o f Contents (continued ) Pag e 4. 0 Result

s 4- 1 4. 1 Wast

e Feedstreams 4- 1 4. 2 Stack

Ga s 4-1 8 4.2. 1 P M i n Stack

Ga s 4-1 8 ' 4.2. 2 HC1/C1 2i n Stac

k Ga s 4-2 2 4.2. 3 Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 6 4.2. 4 Dioxins/Furan s i n Stack Ga s 4-3 4 4.2. 5 TH C i n Stac k

Gas 4-3 9 4. 3 Chlorine , Ash , an dMetal s Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 1 Chlorin e Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 2 As h Feedrate s 4-4 1 4.3. 3 Metal s Feedrate s 4-4 8 5. 0 Qualit

y Assurance/Qualit

y Contro l 5- 1 5. 1 Audi t

Sample s • 5- 2 5. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feed s 5- 2 5.2. 1 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feed s fo r

Metal s 5- 2 5.2. 2 Analysi s o f

Wast e Feeds fo r

Physical an dChemica l Parameter s 5- 4 5. 3 Stac

k Gas 5- 5 5.3. 1 Isokineti c Sample Collectio n 5- 5 5.3. 2 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Detenmnatio n o f

P M ..5- 6 5.3. 3 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

HC1/C1 S 5- 6 5.3. 4 Analysi s o f

Stac k Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

Metal s 5- 7 5.3. 5 Analysi s o f

Stack Ga s Sample s fo r

Determinatio n o f

Dioxins/Furan s 5- 8 5.3. 6 Monitorin g o f

Stack Ga s fo r 0 2 ) C0 2 , andTH C 5- 9 5. 4 Proces s Data5- 9 5. 5 Spikin g 5-1 0

i v

VES01732 5

### List o f Appendice s
APPENDI X A - CEM S RAT A Reports APPENDI X B- Spikin g Repor t APPENDI X C-Proces s Operatin g Data APPENDI X D - CM S Performanc e Evaluatio n Tes t Repor t APPENDT X E -Chains-of-Custody/Fiel dLogbook APPENDI X F - Samplin g Documentatio n APPENDI X G - Analytica l DataReport s

APPENDI X G l - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Liqui dan dSoli dWast

e Fee d Sample s fo r

Metals , Tota l Chlorine , Ash , an dPhysica l Parameters APPENDI X G2

- Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r Dioxins/Furan s APPENDI X G 3 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r

Metal s APPENDI X G 4 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Stac k Sample s fo r

Particulat

e Matter , Hydroge n Chloride , an dChlorin e APPENDED G 5 - Laborator y Report s - Analysi s o f

Spik e Material s APPENDI X G 6 - Audi t

Repor t APPENDI X H - DataQuaht y Assessment

s APPENDI X I - Samphn g Equipment/mstrumentatio n Calibratio n Documentation

v

VES01732 6

### Lis t o f Table s Pag e 1- 1 Applicabl e HW C MAC T Emissio n Standards 1- 3 1- 2 Dat aUse dT o Establis h OPL s 1- 8 1- 3 Unit

2 Comphanc e Summar

y , 1-1 1 1- 4 Unit

3 Complianc e Summar

y 1-1 2 1

- 5 Um t

4 Complianc e Summar

y 1-1 3
2

- 1 Unit

2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 2- 8 2- 2 Unit2-Srunmar y o f Proces s Dat aandFeedrate s Durin g th e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac

k Sampling fo r

HC1/C1 22- 9 2- 3 Uni t

2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d2 9 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 0 2- 4 Uni t

2 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g the SW-84 6 MethodO O 2 3 A Stac k Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 1 2- 5 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

PM
. 2-1 2 2- 6 Unit

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac

k Sampling fo r

HC1/C1 22-1 3 2- 7 Unit

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d2 9 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 4 2- 8 Uni t

3 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aandFeedrate s Durin g the SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stack Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 5 2- 9 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 2-1 6 2-1 0 Unit

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A Stac

k Samphn g fo r HC1/C1 22-1 7 2-1 1 Unit

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e EP A Metho d29 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

Metal s 2-1 8 2-1 2 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Proces s Dat aan

dFeedrate s Durin g th

e SW-84 6 Metho d0023 A Stack Samplin g fo r

Dioxins/Furan s 2-1 9 2-1 3 Uni t

2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2Stack

Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 4 Unit

3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2Stack

Samphng 2-2 0 2-1 5 Unit

4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HC1/HC1 2Stack

Samplin g 2-2 0 2-1 6 Uni t

2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 1 2-1 7 Uni t

3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 1 2-1 8 Uni t

4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac

k Samplin g 2-2 1

v i

VES01732 7

### List o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 2-1 9 Unit

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 2 2-2 0 Unit

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercury Spikin g Solutio n ...2-2 2 2-2 1 Unit

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 2 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercury Spikin g Solutio n 2-2 3 2-2 3 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n 2-2 4 2

- 2 4 Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n : 2-2 4 3

- 1 Measuremen

t Frequency 3- 3 3- 2 Samplin g Method s 3- 4 3- 3 Unit

2 - Summar

y of Isokineti c Samplin g 3- 7 3-4 Uni t

3 - Summar

y of Isokineti c Samplin g 3- 8 3- 5 Uni t

4 - Summar

y o f Isokineti c Samplin g 3-9 3

- 6 Summar

y o f Analytica l Method s 3-1 3 4

- 1 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 5 4- 2 Unit

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 6 4- 3 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n the Specialt

y Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 7 4- 4 Uni t

2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize dSolid s Wast e Feed..
. 4- 8 4- 5 Unit

3 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee d4- 9 4- 6 Unit

3 - Analytical Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee d4-1 0 4- 7 Unit

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e Fee d4-1 1 4- 8 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Containerize dSolid s Wast e Fee d4-1 2

vi i

### List o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 4- 9 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e Fee dt o th e Kil n 4-1 3 4-1 0 Unit

4 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e High-Btu Liqui dWast

e Fee dt o th e Kil n .4-1 4 4-1 1 Unit

4-Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Liqui dWast

e Fee dt o th e SC C , 4-1 5 4-1 2 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s andPhysica l Parameter s i n th e Containerize dSolid s Wast e Fee d4-1 6 4-1 3 Uni t

4 - Analytica l Results fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metal s an dPhysica l Parameter

s i n th e Bul k Solid s Wast

e Fee d4-1 7 4-1 4 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

P M i n Stac

k Ga s 4-1 9 4-1 5 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

P M i n Stack

Ga s 4-2 1 4-1 6 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

P M i n Stack

Gas.
. 4-2 2 4-1 7 Unit2-Result s o f HCl/Cl 2 i n StackGa s 4-2 3 4-1 8 Uni t

3 - Result s o f

HCyCl 2i n Stac k

Ga s 4-2 5 4-1 9 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

HCyCl 2i n Stack

Ga s 4-2 5 4-2 0 Uni t 2 - Analytica l Results o f Metal s i n Stack

Ga s 4-2 7 4-2 1 Uni t

2 - Results o f

Metal s i n Stack

Gas 4-2 8 4-2 2 Uni t

3 - Analytica l Results o f Metal s i n Stack

Ga s 4-2 9 4-2 3 Uni t

3 - Results o f

Metal s i n Stac k

Ga s 4-3 0 4-2 4 Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s o f Metal s i n Stack

Ga s 4-3 2 4-2 5 Uni t 4 - Result s o f

Metal s i n Stack

Gas 4-3 3 4-2 6 Uni t

2 - Result s o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stack

Ga s 4-3 5 4-2 7 Uni t 3 - Results o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stack

Ga s 4-3 7 4-2 8 Uni t

4 - Results o f

Dioxins/Furan s i n Stack

Ga s 4-3 8 4-2 9 Uni t 2 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stack

Ga s 4-3 9 4-3 0 Uni t

3 - Results o f

TC H i n Stack

Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 1 Uni t

4 - Result s o f

TH C i n Stack

Ga s 4-4 0 4-3 2 Uni t

2-Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 2 4-3 3 Uni t

3 - Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 3 4-3 4 Uni t

4-Chlorin e Feedrat

e 3-4 4

vii i

VES01732 9

### List o f Table s (continued ) Pag e 4-3 5 Uni t

2 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4 5 4-3 6 Uni t

3 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samphng fo r

P M 4-4 6 4-3 7 Uni t

4 - As h Feedrat

e Durin g th

e EP A Metho d5 Stac

k Samplin g fo r

P M 4-4

7 4-3 8 Uni t

2 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-4 9 4-3 9 Unit

2 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 1 4-4 0 Uni t

3 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-5 2 4-4 1 Uni t

3 - HW C MACT
. Metal s Feedrat e 4-5 3 4-4 2 Uni t

4 - Metal s Feedrat

e 4-5 4 4

- 4 3 Uni t

4 - HW C MAC T Metal s Feedrat e .- . 4-5 6 5

- 1 Result s o f

Analysi s o f

Audi t Sample s 5- 2


### Lis t o f Figure s Pag e 2- 1 Uni t

2 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m-2- 3 2- 2 Uni t

3 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m2- 4 2- 3 Uni t

4 Proces s Flo w Diagra

m2- 5

i x

VES01733 0

### 1.

0 Introductio n Veoli aE S Technical Solutions , L.L.C
. (Veoha) operate s thre e incinerator s a

t it s Sauget

, Illinoi s facihty
. Tw o o f

th e incinerator s ar

e fixe dheart

h unit s (Unit s 2 an

d3) , andth

e thir d incinerato r

i s arotar y kil n uni t

(Uni t 4)
. Al l o f th e incinerator s trea

t certain waste s tha

t ar e classifie da

s hazardou s unde

r stat e and/o r federal regulations , an

dar e subjec t t o th e National Emissio n Standards fo r

Hazardou s Ai r

Pollutant s (NESHAPs ) fo r Hazardou s Waste Combustor s (Titl e 4 0 o f

th e Cod e o f Federal Regulations , Par t 6 3 [4 0 CF RPar

t 63] , Subpar

t EEE) , (i.e. , th

e HW C MACT)
. h i Augus t an dSeptembe

r o f 2008 , Veoli aconducte d test s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , and4 require db y th e informatio n collectio n requests fromU.S
. EP A Regio n 5 date d Jun e 5 , 200 8 andSeptembe

r 12 , 2008
. Thos e test

s bega n o n Augus t

11 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 2 , Augus t

5 , 200 8 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d Augus t 21 , 200 8 fo r

Unit 4 followin g tes

t plan s approve db y U.S
. EP A Regio n 5
. Initial Comprehensiv e Performanc e Test s (CPTs ) o f Unit s 2,3 , an

d4 commencedo n Decembe r 8,200 9 fo r Uni t 2 ; on Decembe

r 1 , 2009 fo r

Uni t 3 ; andon Decembe

r 16,200 9 fo r

Uni t 4 , andwer

e performe di n accordance with Comprehensiv e Performanc e Tes t Plan s approvedb y U.S
. EP A Regio n 5.Th

e HW C MACT , a

t 4 0 CF R§ 63!l207(d) , state s "The date of commencement

ofthe initial comprehensive performance test is the basis

for establishing the deadline to commence the initial confirmatory performance test and the next comprehensive performance test. You may conduct performance testing at

any time prior

to the required

date. The deadline for commencing subsequent

confirmatory and

comprehensive performance testing is based on the date of commencement

ofthe previous comprehensive performance test." EP A Regio n 5 consider s tha

t th e star t o f th e subsequen

t CPT s be based o n th

e initiatio n o f

th e metal s test

s performe di n 2008 , requirin g tha t th e subsequen

t CP T b e stalle db y Septembe r 5 , 2013 , an

dtha t asite-specifi c test

plan b e submitted before thi s date
. Veoh aoriginall y submitted t o EP A it s notificatio n o f

inten t an dsite-specifi c test

plan s (i.e. , comprehensive performanc e tes t plans ) fo r al l thre e unit s an daQuaht y Assuranc e Projec t

Pla n (QAPjP ) fo r

th e subsequen

t CP T o h Septembe r 5,2012
. Revision s t

o th e CP T Plan s an

dQAPj P wer

e mad e based o n negotiation s wit h E P A Regio n 5
. Th e CP T Pla n an dQAPj P dated Septembe r 25,201 3 wer

e approve db y EP A Regio n 5.
EP A Regio n 5 consider s tha t testin g o f th e three incinerator s comprise s th e CP T fo r Veolia' s facilit y i n Sauget
. Veoh aSauge t starte d th e CP T ofth e thre e incinerator s a

t th e Sauge t facilit y o n Septembe

r 4 , 201 3 with th

e performanc e o f

th e RAT A o f

th e C O andO 2 continuou s monitorin g system

s (CEMS ) o f

Uni t 4
. Th e RAT A o f

th e C O and0 2CEM S o f

Uni t 3 wa s performe do

n Septembe

r 5 , 2013 , an

dth e RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2CEM S o f

Uni t 2 wa s performe do n Septembe

r 6,2013
. Testin g fo r

th e applicabl e parameter

s o f th e HW C MAC T includin g dioxins/furans , tota l hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbo n monoxide (CO) , particulat e matte r 1- 1(PM) , hydroge n chloride/chlorin e ga

s (HCl/Ch) , mercury , SVM , an dLV M wa

s complete do n October 30 , 2012
. I

n accordanc e with 4 0 CF R§63.1207(j)(l)(i ) and§63.1207(j)(3) , th e Notificatio n o f

Comphanc e (NOC ) an

dCP T Repor

t ar e bein g file dwithi n 9 0 day s o f completio n o f the CPT
. Per 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A) , comphanc e with th e DR E standar

di s require dt

o be demonstratedonl y on

e time , an dVeoh aSauge

t demonstrate

dDR E durin g RCR A Tria l Bum s o f Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d4 performe di n Januar

y 1993 , Novembe

r 1996 , an dDecembe

r 1995 , respectively
. Th e HW C MAC T require s tha t DR E onl y b e demonstrate don e tim e a s lon g a s "yo u do not

fee d hazardou s wast

e a t alocatio n i n th

e combustio n syste

mothe r tha n th e norma l flam e zone " (§63.1207(c)(2)(iv))
. Veoli adi dno t re-demonstrat

e DR E i n th

e subsequen

t CPT
. DRE , an dth

e associate dOPLs , wer

e demonstrate

ddurin g th

e Januar y 1993 , Novembe

r 1996 , an dDecembe

r 199 5 RCR A Tria l Burns , respectively fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , an

d4 , an doperation s o f

th e incinerator s hav e not significantl y change dsinc e tha t test . Thi s test (i.e. , th e subsequen

t CPT ) demonstrate

dapplicabl e emissio n standards and estabhshe d OPL s a

s require db y the HW C MAC T fo r dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HCI /CI2 , mercury , SVM , an dLVM
. The result s o f

thi s ar e use dto revis e th

e NO C fo r

th e thre e incinerators
. 1. 1 Incinerato r Overvie w Unit s 2 an

d3 ar e identical fixe dheart

h incineratio n systems with primar y an dsecondar

y combustio n chamber

s tha t trea t sohdwastes a

s wel l a s aqueou s an

dorgani c liquids
. The processe s ar

e monitore dan

dcontrolle db y individua

l distribute dcontro l system s (DCS ) capabl

e o f continuously monitorin g th e processe s t

o assur e al l operationa

l parameter

s ar e withi n regulator y an dpermi t hmit s whil e wast

e i s bein g fe dt

o th e unit
. I n addition , Unit s 2 an d3 ar e equippe dwit

h aContinuou s Emission s Monitorin g Syste m(CEMS ) tha

t continuously sample s th e exhaust

gase s fo r carbo n monoxid

e an doxygen i n th

e stac k ga s exhaust stream . Unit 4 i s arotar

y kil n incineratio n syste

mwit h primar y an dsecondar

y combustion chambers tha

t treat s soh dwastes a

s wel l a s aqueou s an

dorgani c liquids
. Th e proces s i s monitore dan

dcontrolle db y aDC S capabl e o f continuousl

y monitorin g th

e proces s t

o assur e al l operationa

l parameter

s ar e withi n regulator

y andpermi

t limit s whil e wast

e i s bein g fe dt

o th e unit
. I n addition , thi s incinerator i s equippe

dwith aCEM S tha

t continuously sample s th

e exhaust gase s fo r carbon monoxide an

doxygen i n th

e stac k ga s exhaust stream .

1- 2

VES01733 21. 2 Tes t Objective s Thi s subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standard s o f

th e HW C MAC T wa

s designe d and conducte d to demonstrat e comphanc e with th

e standards and associated OPL s o f the HW C MAC T fo r

existin g incinerator s a

t §63.1219
. Th

e CPT :

• Demonstrate d tha

t th e incinerator s mee

t th e applicabl e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s whil e treatin g hazardou s waste ; an d

• Re-establishe doperating paramete r limit s (OPLs ) o n ke y operatin g variable s tha t wil l ensur e tha t the incinerator

operate s withi n th

e HW C MAC T emissio n limit s whil e treatin g hazardou s waste . Th e test progra minclude dfeedin g hqui dan dsohdwast

e material s to th

e incinerators , sampling an

danalyzin g th

e feedstreams , spikin g wast e feedstream

s wit h metal s an dchlorine , monitorin g certai n proces s parameters , conductin g emission s testing , an d samplin g o f

wast e stream s an dspikin g materials
. Apphcabl e emission s standards unde r th e HW C MAC T regulation s demonstrate d during th

e CP T ar e summarizedi n Tabl e 1-1
. Tabl e 1-1
. Applicabl e HW C MAC T Emissio n Standard s Emission s Paramete r Limi t Citatio n
Dioxins/Furan s (TE Q basis ) < 0.2 0 ng/dsc m - Unit s 2 & 3 < 0.4 0 ng/dsc m - Uni t4 40CFR63.1219(a)(l)(i)(A ) 40CFR63.1219(a)(l)(i)(B ) Mercur y < 13 0 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(2 ) Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (Cadmiu m and Lead ) < 23 0 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(3 ) Lo w Volatil e Metal s (LVM ) (Arsenic , Berylliu m and Chromium ) < 9 2 ug/dsc m 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(4 ) Carbo n Monoxid e (CO ) < 10 0 ppmv , dr y 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(5)(i ) Tota l Hydrocarbon s (THC ) < 10 ppmv , dr y 40CFR§63.1219(a)(5)(ii ) Hydroge n Chlorid e & Chlorin e (HC1/C1 2 ) < 32 ppm v dry , a s Cl " 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(6 ) Particulat

e Matte r (PM ) < 0.01 3 gr/dsc f 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(a)(7 ) Destructio n and Remova l Efficienc y (DRE ) > 99.9 9 % 4 0 CF R§ 63.1219(c)(1 ) Note : Al l emissio n concentration s ar e correcte d t

o 7 % oxygen .

1- 3

VES01733 3Th e objective s fo r th e subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standards o f

th e HW C MAC T fo r

eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s wer

e to :

• Demonstrat

e complianc e with stac

k ga s emission s les s tha

n o r equa l t o th e followin g limits , correcte dt o 7 % 0 2 :

—Carbo n Monoxide : 10 0 ppmv , dry ;

—Tota l Hydrocarbons : 1 0 ppmv , dry ;

—Dioxins/Furans : 0.20 n g TEQ/dsc mfo r Unit s 2 an d3 , and0.4 0 n g TEQ/dsc mfo r Unit4 ;

—Particulat

e Matter (PM) : 0.01 3 grains/dscf;

—Mercury : 13 0 p,g/dscm ;

—Semivolatil e Metal s (SVM ) (C dan dPb combined) : 23 0 pg/dscm ;

—Lo w Volatilit y Metal s (LVM ) (As , B e andC r combined) : 9 2 p g /dscm ; and

—Hydroge n Chloride/Chlorin e (HCI /CI2) : 3 2 ppm

v a s Cl " equivalent , dry
.
• Comphanc e with th

e DR E standar

d(99.99 % DRE ) i s demonstratedusin g dat afro m previou s RCR A tria l bums
.
• Estabhs h limit s fo r

operating parameters .
• Conduc t

aContinuou s Monitorin g System(CMS ) performanc e evaluatio n test .
• Conduc t

aRelativ e Accurac y Tes t Audi t (RATA ) fo r

the C O an

dO 2 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g Systems (CEMS
. 1.3 Tes t Protoco l Summar y A definitio n o f

th e apphcable emissio n limit s an dth e resultin g operating paramete r limit s (OPLs ) ar e give n i n Sectio n 4. 0 o f

th e CP T plan s fo r

each incinerator
. Th e subsequen t CP T o f eac h o f the incinerator s include don e tes t condition , andth

e test conditio n include don

e mod e o f operation
. One se

t o f OPL s was develope dfo r eac h incinerator
. T n the firs t par t o f the test fo r eac h incinerator , Veoh ademonstratedcomplianc e with th e particulate matte

r standar do f th e HW C MAC T whil e th

e plant was operatedt

o estabhsh th

e maximu mas h feedrat

e an dmaximu mcombustio n ga s flowrate OPL s a

s require dby th

e HW C MAC T fo r

th e particulat

e matte r standard
. Comphanc e with th e standar dfo r carbon monoxid e •wa s als o demonstrateddurin g thi s portio n o f th e test . I n th e secon dpar t o f th e test fo r eac h incinerator , Veoh ademonstratedcompliance , and develope dOPLs , with th

e HCl/Cl 2 , dioxins/furans , THC , CO , LVM , SVM , andmercur y standards o f

th e HW C MAC T whil e th

e plant wa s operatedto estabhs h maximu mtota l hazardou s wast

e feedrate , maximumpumpable hazardou s wast e feedrate , rninimu mprimar y combustio n chambe

r (PCC ) temperature , rmnimumsecondar y combustio n chambe

r (SCC ) temperature , maximu mLVM , SVM , an dH g feedrates , maximu mchlorin e feedrate , maxhnu m

1- 4

VES01733 4combustio n ga s flowrate, an

dmaximu minle t

temperatur

e t o th e baghouse
. As h wa

s fe dt o th e incinerator s a

t normal (o

r higher ) level s durin g thi s portio n o f th e test . Comphanc e with th e standar d fo r carbon monoxid

e wa s also , demonstrated durin g thi s test Sample s o f

th e waste s fe ddurin g th

e test s wer e sample dever

y 1 5 minute s and composite dfo r

analysis
. Wast

e fee dsample s wer

e collecte di n coordinatio n with the PM , HCl/Cb , metals , anddioxins/furan s stac k testing
. Composite hqui dwast e fee dsample s associate dwith each o f

th e fou r samplin g train s wer

e analyze dfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content, moisture , density , an

dviscosity
. The composit e hqui dwast

e fee dsample s collecte ddurin g th e Metho d2 9 stac

k sampling fro mth

e secon dpar t o f th e test wer e als o analyze dfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , andmercury)
. Al l o f th e composit

e sohdwast

e fee d samples , containerize dandbulk , fro mth e first an dsecondpart

s o f th e tes t wer e analyze dfo r

tota l chlorine , ash , moisture , an dhea t content . The composit

e containerize dwast

e fee dsample s fo r

Unit s 2 , 3 , an d4 , an dbul k sohdwast

e fee dsample s fro mUni t 4 , collecte ddurin g th

e Metho d2 9 stac

k samphng fro mth

e secon dpar t o f th e tes t wer e als o analyze dfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. Th e incinerator s wer

e operate d fo r 3 0 minute s a

t th e desire dfeedrate s an

doperating condition s befor

e samphn g bega n fo r agiven conditio n o f

th e testin g t o assur e al l operating parameters wer

e stabilize da

t th e desiredsetting s t

o achiev e stead

y state . Spikin g with chromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e wa s initiate da

t leas t 3 0 minute s befor e beginnin g samphn g i n the secon dpar

t of eac h test ru n fo r HCI /CI2 , metals , an

ddioxiris/furan s to assur e tha t feedrate s o f spikin g material s hadstabilize dbefor e samphng began
. Spikin g o f th e wast e fee dwit h clrromium , lead , mercury , an dchlorin e continue dthrough th e completio n o f

th e stac k samphng fo r dioxins/furans , th

e las t samplin g t

o b e completed
. Chlorin e an

dth e metal s lead , chromiu man dmercur y wer e spike dint o eac

h o f th e thre e incinerator s during , andthroughout, th e secondpar

t o f eac h test run . The LV M categor

y fo r incinerator s include s arsenic , berylliu mandchromium
. Chromiu mwa s spike da s asolutio n o f chromi c aci dint o th

e PC C o f th e respectiv e incinerators
. Th e SV M categor y fo r incinerator s include s cadmiuman

dlead
. Leadwa

s spike da s soh dlea dnitrat e fe dt o th e incinerator

s i n pre measure d plasti c baggie s a

t regula r interval s wit

h th e containerize dsoli dwaste . Mercur y i s th e onl y hig h volatility meta

l of th e HW C MACT
. Mercury wa s spike da s amercuri c nitrat

e solution , an dwa s fe di n vial s fe dt

o th e incinerato

r a t regula r interval s with th

e containerizedsoli dwaste . Th e concentration o f

th e solutio n o f

mercuri c nitrat

e wa s differen t

(higher ) fo r Uni t 4 tha n fo r Unit s 2 an d3
. On e via l containin g 1 0 mL s o f th e mercuri c nitrat

e solutio n wa

s fe dpe r charg e o f th e containerize dsoh dwast

e t o Unit s 2 an

d3 , an don e via l containin g 2 0 mL s wer e fe dwit h eac h charge o f th e containerize dsohdwastes t o Unit 4
. 4 0 CF R§63.1207(g)(1)(A ) require s feedin g norma l (o r higher ) level s o f

chlorin e durin g th

e tes t fo r dioxins/furans
. Chlorin e wa s spikedth

e secon dpar t o f th e test an dthroughou

t th e dioxins/furan s testing t

o provid e aconsisten

t feedrat e o f chlorine throughou

t th e dioxins/furan s 1- 5

VES01733 5sampling
. The average feedrat e o f chlorin e fo r

Unit 2 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h Ma y 201 3 wa

s 3 5 lb/hr ; th

e averag e feedrat e o f chlorin e fo r

Uni t 3 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h Ma y 201 3 wa

s 3 1 lb/hr ; an

dth e averag e feedrat e o f chlorin e fo r

Uni t 4 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 through Ma y 201 3 was 8 2 lb/hr
. Th e spikin g rat e o f chlorin e wa

s abou t 20 0 lbs/hr fo r al l thre e incinerators
. Pursuan t t o 4 0 CF R§63.1209(m)(3) , Veoh ai s establishin g amaximumas h feedrat e during th e CP T fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerators , developedi n associatio n wit h th e samphn g o f th e stac k ga s fo r particulat e matter . The desire dash feedrat e wa s achieve da

s th e as h fe dt o the incinerato

r with th e wastes , primarily soh

dwastes . The requiremen

t i n 4 0 CF R§63.120 7 (g

) (1)(B ) fo r

feedin g normal (o r

higher ) level s o f as h durin g th

e SV M an dLV M performanc e test

s wa s achieve db

y th e feedin g o f

soli dwastes . Th e average solid s feedrat e o f as h i n the firs t

par t ofth e tes t

was 503. 0 lbs/hr fo r Uni t 2,525. 8 lbs/hr

fo r Uni t 3 , an d4,777. 2 lbs/hr

fo r Uni t 4
. Th e feedin g o f

soli d waste s continue dthroughou t the secon dpar t o f th e test a t rate s similar

t o those i n th

e first par t o f th e test . Th e averag e feedrat e o f as h fo r Unit 2 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h Ma y 201 3 was 10

2 lb/hr ; th e averag e feedrat e o f as h fo r Unit 3 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 wa

s 10 9 lb/hr ; andth e average feedrat

e o f as h fo r Unit 4 fro mDecembe

r 201 2 throug

h May 201 3 was 94 9 lb/hr
. 4 0 CF R63.1207(g)(l)(i)(C ) require s tha t test s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d <Uoxms/furans includ e anorma l cleanin g cycl e o f

th e P M contro l device
. Fo r

each o f th e thre e units , the baghous e i s th

e uni t o f th e air pollutio n contro l trai n tha t i s designe

dandoperate

d t o contro l particulat

e matter . Testin g i n al l thre e run s fo r PM , SVM , LVM , mercury , an d dioxins/furan s wa

s performe dincludin g acleanin g cycl e o f th e fabri c filte r

(i.e. , baghouse)
. Per 4 0 CF R§63.1206(b)(7)(i)(A ) comphanc e wit h the DR E standar d i s require dt

o b e demonstrated only on

e tim e an dVeoli ademonstrate

d DR E fo r

eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s i n RCR A tria l burns
. Th e RCR A tria l bu mfo r Unit 2 was conducte di n Januar y 1993 , an

dth e RCR A tria l bur

n fo r Uni t 3 wa s conducte di n November 1996
. The RCR A tria l bur n fo r Uni t 4 wa s conducte di n Decembe r 1995
. Veoli adi dno

t re-demonstrat

e DR E i n th

e subsequen

t CP T fo r th e Fina l Replacemen

t Standards o f

th e HW C MAC T becaus e DRE , an dth e associate dOPLs , wer e demonstrated durin g th

e RCR A tria l burns , an

doperation s o f

th e incinerator s hav e no

t significantl y changedsinc e thos e tests . The operating limit s associate dwith th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 2 are :

• Maximu mTotal Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e 3,10 7 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTotal Wast e Feedrat e 4,01 7 lb/hr ;
• Minimu mStac

k Ga s Flowrate 15,605 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,658°F ; and

• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Secondar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,848°F
.

1- 6

VES01733 6Th e operating limit s associatedwit h th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 3 are :

• Maximu mTota l Pumpable Wast e Feedrat e 4,04 5 lb/hr ;
• Maximu mTota l Wast e Feedrat e 5,09 8 lb/hr ;
• Mnimu mStack

Ga s Flowrat

e 16,06 1 acfm ;
• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r l,627°F;an d

• Mimmu mTemperatur e i n th e Secondar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,845°F
. The operating hmit s associatedwit h th e standar d fo r DR E fo r Uni t 4 are : Maximu mTota l Pumpable Wast e Feedrat e t o th e Kil n Maximu mTota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e t o th e SC C Maximu mTota l Wast

e Feedrat e t o th e Kil n Maximu mTota l Wast

e Feedrat e t o th e SC C Minimu mStack

Ga s Flowrat

e 3,31 2 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 18,66 7 lb/hr ; 1,78 8 lb/hr ; 44,90 0 acfm ;
• Mmimu mTemperatur e i n th e Primar y Combustio n Chambe

r l,415°F;an d

• Minimu mTemperatur e i n th e S econdar

y Combustio n Chambe

r 1,798°F
. Th e OPL s associate dwit h eac h o f the apphcabl e emissio n standards (i.e. , PM , HCI/CI 2 gas , metals , anddioxins/furans ) wer e develope dusin g proces s dat ataken durin g th

e collectio n o f th e applicabl e samphng trai n (i.e. , EP A Metho d5 fo r particulate matter , Modifie dEP A Metho d26 A fo r

HC1/C1 2 , EP A Metho d29 fo r metals , an dSW-84 6 Metho d0023 A fo r dioxins/furans)
. Operatin g paramete r dat awer e use da s show n i n Tabl e 1-

2 t o develop HW C MAC T OPLs
. TH C i s typicall y monitore di n CPT s durin g th e measuremen

t o f DRE
. Th e OPL s fo r TH C (Le. , minimu mcombustio n chambe r temperatur

e i n th e primary combustio n chamber , minimu mcombustio n chambe r temperatur

e i n th e secondar

y combustio n chamber, maximu m flu e ga s flowrate , maximu mpumpabl e hazardou s wast

e feedrate , andmaximu mtota l wast e feedrate ) ar

e th e sam e a s th e OPL s fo r

DR E an ddioxins/furans
. Eve n though DR E was not demonstrated , TH C wa

s measure d durin g the secondpar

t o f eac h test ru n o f th e CP T fo r

eac h unit .

1- 7

VES01733 7Tabl e 1-2 . Dat a Use d t o Establis h OPL s

Demonstrated OPL s Emissio n Standar d OPL s Develope d Durin g th

e CP T Demonstrated OPL s Emissio n Standar d Uni t2 Uni t3 Uni t4
Maximu m Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrat

e DR E 199 3 199

6 1995 Maximu m Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrat

e TH C V • Maximu m Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrat

e Dioxins/Furan s V • Maximu m Tota l Wast e Feedrat

e DR E 199 3 199

6 1995 Maximu m Tota l Wast e Feedrat

e TH C • • Feedrat Dioxins/Furan s • •

Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e SV M • •
Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e L V M • • Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e P M • • Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e HC1/C1 2 • • • Flowrat DR E 199 3 199

6 1995 Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e TH C • • Maximum Stac

k Ga s Flowrat e
Dioxins/Furan s • Minimum Combustio

n Chambe

r Temperatur

e i n th e PC C DR E 199 3 199

6 199

5 Minimum Combustio

n Chambe

r Temperatur

e i n th e PC C TH C • • • Combustio Temperatur Dioxins/Furan s • V V Minimum Combustio

n Chambe

r Temperatur

e in th e SC C DR E 199 3 199

6 1995 Minimum Combustio

n Chambe

r Temperatur

e in th e SC C TH C • • • / Minimum Combustio

n Chambe

r Temperatur

e in th e SC C Dioxms/Furan s • • Maximum Tota

l Feedrat e o f LV M (As , Be , Cr

) L V M Maximum Pumpabl

e Feedrat e of LV M (As , Be , Cr ) L V M • • • Maximum Feedrat

e of SV M (Pb , Cd ) SV M S Maximum Feedrat

e of Mercur y (Hg ) H g s • • Maximu m Feedrat

e o f Ash P M s • Maximum Feedrat

e o f Tota l Chlorine/Cbloride HC1/C1 2 • / Maximum Feedrat

e o f Tota l Chlorine/Cbloride L V M • • Feedrat e o f Tota l Chlorine/Cbloride SV M • • • /
Maximu m Baghous

e Inle tTemperatur

e TH C • Maximu m Baghous

e Inle tTemperatur

e Dioxins/Furan s • • Maximu m Baghous

e Inle tTemperatur

e L V M Maximu m Baghous

e Inle tTemperatur

e SV M • • Minimu m Carbo n Feedrat e Dioxins/Furan s N A N A • Minimu m Carbo n Feedrat e H g N A N A • Minimu m Sorben

tFeedrat e HC1/C1 2 • • • Minimum Carrie

r Flui d Flowrat

e HC1/C1 2 / • 199 3 - Operatin

g dat a from th

e Januar y 199 3 RCR A Tria l Bu m fo r Uni t2 . 199 6 - Operatin

g dat a fro m th e Novembe

r 199 6 RCR A Trial Bu m fo r Uni t3 . 199 5 - Operatin

g dat a from th

e Decembe

r 199 5 RCR A Tria

l Bu m fo r Uni t4 .

1- 8

VES01733 81. 4 CP T Schedul e Th e subsequen

t CP T o f th e thre e incinerator s a

t th e Sauge t faciht y bega

n wit h th e performanc e of

RATAs
. Th e RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2continuou s monitorhi g system s (CEMS ) o f Uni t 4 wa s performe don Septembe r 4,2013
. Th e RAT A o f

th e C O and0 2CEM S o f

Uni t 3 wa s performe don Septembe r 5,2013 , an

dth e RAT A o f

th e C O an d0 2CEM S o f

Uni t 2 wa s performe don Septembe

r 6 , 2013
. Th e CP T wit h testin g fo r dioxins/furans , THC , CO , PM , HCI/C1 2gas , mercury , SVM , an dLV M wa

s conducte di n Octobe

r 2013
. The CP T testin g fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s wa s observe db y staf

f fro mth e Illinoi s Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y (IEPA)
. Du e t o th e federa l governmen

t shutdown i n th

e earhe r stages o f Octobe r 2013 , staf

f fro mEP A Regio n 5 observe d th e CP T testin g onl y o f

Uni t 4 , th e las t uni t tested
. Th e subsequen

t CP T o f Unit 2 wa s begu n Octobe r 8 , 2013
. Ru n 1 o f

th e tes t wa s successfull y complete do n thi s day
. Ru n 2 wa s performe do n Octobe

r 9 , 2013
. Th

e firs t par t o f Ru n 2 was successfull y completed
. Durin g th e secondpar

t o f Ru n 2 , th e TH C monito

r faile dan d drifte dwel l beyondth

e emissio n limi t

o f th e HW C MAC T fo r

THC
. I t wa s recognize dtha

t th e TH C monito r

usedt o demonstrat

e comphanc e wit h the HW C MAC T hadmalfunctione dbecaus e Veoh amonitor s stack

gase s fo r

THC , an dth e concentratio n o f

TH C monitore db y Veoli ahad no t increased
. Th e secon dpar t o f Ru n 2 was stoppe dfo r

thi s reason . Th e TH C monitor wa s replace dandRu n 3 was performe do n Octobe r 10 , 2013
. Wit h th

e successfu l completio n o f Ru n 3 , thre e run s fo r P M ha dbee

n successfull y completed
. Th e thir dru n o f th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f Uni t 2 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) was performe do n Octobe r 11 , 2013
. A t

th e completio n o f

Ru n 4 , th e leak

check o f th e pito t tube s o f th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n di dno t mee t th e ful l requirements o f th e apphcabl e EP A tes t

metho d(i.e. , EP A Metho d2 ) although i t was considere dtha

t th e leak

chec k o f th e pito t tabes was acceptable
. Becaus e i t was fel t tha t th e result s o f

th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n wer

e acceptable , thi s ru n o f

th e CP T o f Uni t 2 was no t

re-done
. Personnel fro m EP A Regio n 5 declare dtha t th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n wa s unacceptable whe n on-sit e th e wee k o f Octobe r 21 , 2013
. Anothe

r ru n o f th e secon dpar

t o f th e test , fo r HC1/C1 2 , metals , an d dioxins/furans , (i.e. , Ru n 5 ) was performe do n Octobe r 30 , 2013
. Th e subsequen

t CP T of Unit 3 wa s begu n Octobe r 15 , 2013
. Th e firs t

par t o f Ru n 1 , fo r PM , wa s successfull y completedo n thi s day
. However , the isokineti c sampling rat e o f th e dioxins/furan s samplin g trai n di dnot mee t metho dacceptanc e criteria , an dth e secondpar

t o f thi s run , fo r

HC1/C1 2 , metals , an ddioxins/furans , ha dt o be repeate

d a s Ru n 4
. Ru n 2 was'performe d o n Octobe r 16,2013 , andRu n 3 was performe don Octobe r 17 , 2013
. Th e thirdsuccessfu l run o f th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f Uni t 3 (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa

s performe do

n Octobe r 18 , 2013
.

1- 9

VES01733 9Th e subsequen t CP T of Uni t 4 was begun Octobe

r 23 , 201 3 with th

e successfu l completio n o f

Ru n 1
. Ru n 2 wa

s performe do n Octobe

r 24 , 2013
. Th e glas s nozzl e o f the P M samplin g trai n was chippe dwit h th e withdrawal o f

th e samphn g prob e fro mth

e stac k a t th e completio n o f

th e run . Althoug h th

e samphn g trai n me

t al l acceptanc e criteria , includin g th e fina l leak-check , th

e second ru n fo r

P M was repeated
. Ru n 3 wa s performe do n Octobe

r 25 , 2013
. Th e third(accepted

) ru n fo r P M (i.e. , Ru n 4 ) wa s performe da t th e conclusio n o f

Ru n 3 fo r PM
. Incinerator

operating condition s require d fo r th e P M testin g wer

e maintaine d throug

h bot h o f thes e test runs . 1. 5 Summary o

f Result s Veoli asuccessfull y demonstrate d complianc e with al l o f th e apphcable regulator

y requirement s of

th e HW C MAC T fo r

Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an d Uni t 4 usin g th

e result s fro mth

e singl e tes t conditio n o f

eac h unit
. Tabl e 1-

3 summarize s th

e result s o f

the emission s testing o f

Uni t 2
. Tabl e 1- 4 summarize s th

e result s o f

th e emission s testing o f

Uni t 3 , an d Tabl e 1-

5 summarize s the result s o f

th e emission s testing o f

Uni t 4
. Th e test

fo r eac h uni t consiste d o f

thre e reporte d run s fo r eac h paramete

r o f interest
. Th e term"test

condition " refer s to th

e su mo f al l th e testin g activitie s designe d t

o demonstrat

e th e operatio n of

th e wast e incinerato r

unde r particula r operatin g parameter

s (e.g. , developmen

t o f operatin g paramete

r limits ) unde

r th e HW C MACT
. Th e ter m"test run " refer s t

o th e replicat e testin g periods
. A complet e definitio n ofth e tes t protoco l and methodology i s define di n th e CP T Plan an

d QAPjP
. 1.6 Repor

t Organizatio n Th e remainde

r o f thi s repor t present s th

e followin g sections : Proces s Operations ; Sampling , Analysis , an

d Monitorin g Procedures ; Results ; an

d Qualit y Assurance/Qualit

y Control
. Th e appendice s provide ra w data , includin g chain-of-custody forms , samphn g datasheet

s an d logs , laborator

y reports , proces s data , CM S PE T sheets , spikin g reports , and samphn g equipmen t calibratio n forms
. • Sectio n 2.0

- • Sectio n 3. 0 - • Sectio n 4. 0 - • Sectio n 5. 0 -

1-1 0

VES01734 0Tabl e 1-3 . Uni t 2 Complianc e Summary Uni t2 Paramete r HW C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-8-13 Ru n 2

10-9-1 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 Run S 10-30-13 Averag e Particulat

e Matte r - EP A Method 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 <0.0008 7 <0.0006

8 <0.0005

8 <0.0007 1 HC1/C1 2- Modifie d EP A Metho d 26A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl" , correcte

d t o 1% 0 2 <2

9 <1 3 <1

8 <2

0 Metal s - EP A Metho

d 2 9 LV M 9 2 u,g/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % O j <2.

8 . <2. 4 <2.

5 <2.

6 SV M 23 0 ug/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 < U <0.7 8 <1.

0 <0.9

5 Mercur y 13 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 <9 0 <12 0 <9

5 <10

0 Dioxins/Furan

s - SW-84

6 Method 0023

A 0.2 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0054 3 0.0062 4 0.015

7 0.0091 2 Tota l Hydrocarbon

s (THC ) - EP A Metho

d 25A 1 0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 1. 6 0.1 8 0.4 9 0.7

5 Carbo n Monoxid e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.1

5 0.0

5 TH C an d C O result

s collecte d durin g th e stac k samplin

g for dioxins/furans .

1-1 1

VES01734 1Tabl e 1-4 . Uni t 3 Complianc e Summar y

Paramete r HW C MAC T Lirni t Uni t3 Paramete r HW C MAC T Lirni t Run l 10-15-13 Ru n 2

10-16-13 Ru n 3

10-17-1 3 Ru n 4 10-18-13 Averag e Particulat

e Matte r - EP A Method 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0019 4 0.0020

2 0.0020

4 0.0020 O HCI /CI 2 - Modifie d EP A Method 26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl" , correcte

d t o 7 % Ch <4. 5 <4.

4 <1.

8 <3.

6 Metals - EP A Metho

d 2 9 L V M SV M Mercur y 92 (ig/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 23 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 13 0 ug/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 <8. 6 <2 0 <5 9 <8.

9 <1 4 <3 9 <1 1

<1 2 <4 6 <9.

4 <1 5 <4 8 Dioxins/Furan

s - SW-846 Method 0023 A 0.2 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0010 3 0.0011

5 0.0013

4 0.00U 8 Tota l Hydrocarbon

s (THC ) - EP A Metho d 25 A 1

0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.4 4 0.2

6 0.5

7 0.4

3 Carbo n Monoxid

e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

1 TH C an

d C O result

s collecte

d durin g th e stac k samplin

g for dioxins/furans .

1-1 2

VES01734 2Tabl e 1-5 . Uni t 4 Complianc e Summar y Uni t4 Paramete r HW C MAC T Limi t Run l 10-23-1 3 Ru n 2 10-24-13 Ru n 3

10-25-1 3 Ru n 4 10-25-1 3 Averag e Particulat

e Matte r - EP A Metho

d 5 0.01 3 gr/dsc f correcte d t o 7 % 0 2 0.0026 9 0.0018 3 <0.0019 <0.002 1 HCl/Cl a - Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A 3 2 ppm v dry , a s Cl" , correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 <1 1 <8. 0 <2

3 <1 4 Metals - EP A Metho

d 2 9 L V M 9 2 ug/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 <1 2 <9.

8 <7.

5 <9. 7 SV M 23 0 ug/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % O z <8. 6 <4.

5 <1

0 <7. 8 Mercur y 13 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 <7. 1 <8. 1 <1 5 <1 0 Dioxins/Furan

s - SW-84

6 Melhod 0023

A 0.4 0 ng/dsc m correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 0.13 8 0.13

2 0.13

9 0.13 7 Tota l Hydrocarbon

s (THC ) - EP A Metho

d 25 A 1

0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 1% 0 2 0.5 1 0.6

0 0.8

5 0.6 5 Carbo n Monoxid

e (CO) 1 10 0 ppmv , dr y correcte

d t o 1% 0 2 0.0 7 0.0

6 0.0

8 0.0 7

1 TH C an

d C O result

s collecte d durin g th e stac k samplin

g fo r dioxins/furans .

1-1 3

VES01734 3

### 2. 0 Proces s Operation s Thi s sectio n present

s brie f description s o f

th e thre e incinerator s a

t Veolia' s facihty i n Sauget , IL , andproces s an dfeedrat e result s fro mth

e CPT s ofth e thre

e incinerators
. 2. 1 Proces s Overvie w Veoli aoperate s two Fixe dHeart h Dua l Chamberedincinerator s (Unit s 2 an d3 ) an don e rotar y Mi n incinerator

(Uni t 4 ) a t th e Sauget, I L facility
. Th

e tw o fixedheart

h units ar e rate da t 1 6 millio n Btu/hr

each
. Unit

3 i s amirror

imag e o f Uni t 2
. Bot h o f thes e units have their

ow n wast

e handlin g systems . Unit s 2 an

d3 featur

e atwo-stag

e combustio n process . Ignitio n o f wast e materia l take s plac e i n th

e primar y (lower ) combustion chambe

r (PCC)
. A secondar

y (upper ) combustio n chambe r (SCC ) serve s a

s a n "afterburner " fo r

proces s gases . Liqui dwastes , organi c an daqueous , an dsoh dwaste s ar

e fe dt o th e PCC
. Air-atomizin g injector s ar e usedfo r

injectio n o f

high-Bt u liquids , low-Bt u hquid s an dspecialt y fee dliquids
. Sohds , usually package di n plasti c or fiberboard containers , ar

e introduce dinto th

e incinerator

through aPL C controlle dairlock-ra msyste mlocate d a t th e lower fron t o f the PCC
. Th e ai r pollutio n contro l system

s o f Unit s 2 and3 consis t

o f aspra y drye r absorbe r an d fabri c filte r

baghous e modules
. The air pollutio n contro l syste

mneutralize s acidi c compound s an d remove s particulat

e matte r fro mth e exhaust gas . Tw o subsystems , th

e spra y drye r absorbe r an dth e fabri c filter, carr

y ou t th e chemica

l neutralizatio n an

dparticulat

e remova l functions , respectively
. A n induce ddraf

t fa n an dstac k provid e th e mechanica

l energ y require dt

o transpor t th e flu e ga s throug h th e interconnecting ductwork , t o it s eventua

l discharge point

t o atmosphere
. The onl y differenc e betwee

n Unit s 2 an

d3 i s tha t Uni t 2 i s equippedwit

h fou r (4 ) baghouse modules , whil e Uni t 3 i s equippedwit

h thre e (3 ) baghous e modules
. However , eac h incinerator

i s operate d identicall y wit

h onl y thre

e baghous e module s i n servic e during operation
. A complet

e descriptio n o f

Unit s 2 an

d3 i s provide di n th

e CP T Plan
. A proces s flo w diagra mfo r Unit 2 i s presente

d i n Figur e 2-1 , andaproces s flo w diagra mfo r Uni t 3 i s presente

d i n Figur e 2-2
.

2- 1

VES01734 4Uni t 4 i s rateda

t 5 0 millio n Btu/h

r an di s equippedwit

h it s ow n tan

k farmsystem , drum storage , bulk

sohd s storag

e an dfee dsystems . Uni t

4 include s arotar

y kil n a s th e PCC , an

daSCC
. Liquid s ar

e fe dt o eithe r th e kil n PC C o r

the SCC
. Bul k

soh dwaste s ar

e fe dt o th e kil n throug

h th e ra mfeeder
. Containerize dwastes ar e fe dt o th e kil n throug

h th e ra mfeede r o r th e auxiliar y ra m feeder
. Th e hqui dwast

e injector s usedi n th

e combustio n chamber

s ar e air-atomizin g injectors , and ar e use dfo r injectio n o f

pumpable sludges , aqueou s waste s an dorgani c hqui dwaste s t

o th e kil n andfo r injectio n o f

organi c hqui dwast

e to th e SCC
. Th e air pollutio n contro l syste

mconsist s o f

atemperin

g chamber, tw o spra

y drye r absorbers , an

dfabri c filter

baghous e module s wit

h carbon injection
. Th e air pollutio n contro l syste mneutralize s acidi c compounds andremove s particulat e fro mth e exhaust gas . Tw o subsystems , th

e spra y drye r absorbe r an dth e fabri c filter , carr

y ou t th e chemica

l neutralizatio n an

d particulat e removal functions , respectively
. A n induce ddraf t fa n an dstac k provide th

e mechanica

l energy require dt

o transpor t th e flu e ga s throug h th e interconnecting ductwork , t o it s eventua

l discharg e poin

t t o atmosphere
. A complet

e description o f

Uni t 4 i s provide di n th

e Comprehensive Performanc e Tes t Plan
. A proces s flo w diagra

mfo r Uni t 4 i s presented i n Figure 2-3
.

2- 2

VES01734 5Figur e 2-1 . Uni t 2 Proces s FlowDiagra m

TAN K FARM , PIREC T INJECT
. HIG H

BTU
. UOUID S

SOLIDS

I I
. I 1 I

i I T I I ITTT T COMBUSTIO N AI R 8LOW R

TAN K FAR M , LO W

8T U
. DIREC T INJEC T , .LIQUID S
LIQUID--CONTAINERS , GA S CYIINOM , SPECIALT Y

FEEDER
.
\PRIMAR Y V 1 / W/ .LT .Fi f Ff , V '

-SKOHOMf f m INCINERATO R LOWE R CHAMBE R EMH«SO( « STAC K

INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R

WASH , DUMRSTE R U M E PREPARATIO N SYSTEM :

SPRA Y P R Y ABSORBE R MAI NSTACK

-

STAQ t CA S MtAMK S -

BAGHOUS E 1,0
. FA N

DR Y SCRUBBE R OR Y SCRUBBE R SOUD S (
. OS S ) SQUOS i ( OS S ) EM O DUM P EN D DUM P

-FUELS/UOJI O WASTE FCjD W 1~ -COMBUSTIO

N AlS-pmr

f » STAC KCA S RO W ccooco - AS H FLO

W lOOOO*. : SPU D WAST E ao w ; v \ V > UM

E SLURR Y FLP WFigur e 2-2 . Uni t 3 Proces s FlowDiagra m

TAN K FAR M DIREC T INJECT
. I I ' I I I I I Ml
. TTH t COMBUSTIO N AI R BUME R

,UfflOTO £ m

TAN K FAR M ¥ W W

BT U DIREC T INJEC T UOUJD S ffrrr r J.T. T T T T 'SECOWMR Y INCINERATO R LOVE R CHAMBE R

I EWEStEKc r STA &

|»UBTOIi8iWiS

I

XT AS H DUMPSTE R

SPECIALTY'FKOE R FUM EHOO D EMISSIO NCONTRO L SYSTE M PRIMAR Y FUE L 

# > .UM E PREPARATIO N SYSTE M

1 T INCINERATO R

UPPE R CHAMBE R INCINERATO R UPPE R CHAMBE R

~ 1 MAI M STACK

-

iwat CA S ANALT!£SS »

:SPRA Y DR Y ABSORBE R BAGHOUS E 1.0
. FA N

OR Y SCRUBBE RI S0U0 5 ( OS S } EN D DUM P DR Y SCRUB8E R

SOUO S ( OS S j END
. DUM P

GLOV EBO X EMISSIO NCONTRO U SYSTE M FUELS/UQUI D WAST E .RO W : »

_ COMBUSTIO N AI R RO W » - STAC KCA S FLO W tnccoo
- AS H ao w X3O0C* - SOU O WAST E FLO W \\\ » UM E SLURR Y FLOW

2- 4

VES01734 7Figur e 2-3 . Uni t 4 Proces s Flo w Diagra m

TAN K FARh U
DIREC TINJEC T

tooooooH

TAN KFAR M „ to

w B T U DIREC TINJEC T, UOUIO S SJRS E iWN T

KIL N

\PRIMAR Y V / FUE L/ D R YSCRUBBE R [SOLID S { DS S ) E N D DUM P WESBENC Y STAC K

SECONDAR Y COMBUSTIO N CHAMBE R

AS H ROLL-OF F
BMBUSTlO M AI R BIONER S TEMPERIN G CHAMBE R SPRA Y D R Y ABSORBE R

LIM E PREPARATIO N SYSTE M

SPRA Y O R Y ABSORBE R
m AS H DR YAS H DUMPSTE R DUMPSTE R I DRY SCRUBBE R jsOUD S ( DS S ) E N D DUM P OR YSCRUBBE R ISOUD S ( DS S ) BH D OUM P 

# 8

BAGHOUS E . MAI N STACK -

CARBO N INJECTIO N SYSTE M

BAGHOUS E

OR Y SCRUBBER 1 |S0L!D S ( OS S ) EN D DUM P

XDQOO V FUELSAIOUI D WAST E FLO W COMBUSTIO N AI RFLO W STAC K -GA S FLO W AS H FLO W SOUD

- WAST E FLO W LIM ? SLURR Y FLO W

2- 5

VES01734 82. 2 Proces s Operatin g Dat a an d Wast e Feedrate s Proces s parameter

s tha t wer e monitore dand recorde d durin g th e test b y Veolia , an

d feedrate s tha

t resul t fro mth e combinatio n o f

wast e feedrate s wit

h th e respectiv e wast

e fee d analyses , ar

e presented i n thi s section
. Proces s dat arecorde d b y Veoli aever y 1 5 seconds ar

e use d t o creat e one-minut

e average s (OMAs)
. Th e DC S calculate s hourl y rollin g average s (HRAs ) fo r applicabl e parameter

s usin g th e OM A fro mth

e firs t minut e an dth e OMA s fro mpreviou s 5 9 minute s o f

data
. Th e ra

w dat afro mVeoha' s DC S ar

e provide di n Appendi x C
. 2.2. 1 Uni t 2 Proces s dataan

d wast e an d paramete

r feedrate s hav e bee

n determined and ar

e presente d fo r th e tim e period s ove

r th e collectio n o f

th e stac k ga s samphng train s fo r

particulat

e matte r (EP A Metho d5) , HC1/C1 2(Modifie dEP A Metho d26A) , metal s (EP A Metho d29) , and dioxins/furan s (SW-84 6 Metho d0023A ) an dTH C (EP A Metho d25A)
. Tabl e 2- 1 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e particulat

e matte r (PM ) stack

ga s samphng o f

th e firs t par t o f eac h test ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 2 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g the HC1/C1 2stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e secondpar

t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 3 presents proces s dat asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g the metal s stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e second par

t o f eac h test ru n fo r Uni t 2
. Tabl e 2- 4 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac

k ga s samplin g an

dmonitorin g o f

th e secondpar

t o f eac h test ru n fo r Uni t 2
. 2.2. 2 Uni t 3 Tabl e 2- 5 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e P M stac k ga s samphn g o f th e firs t par t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 6 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e HCI /CI 2 stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e secondpar

t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 7 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e metal s stac

k ga s samplin g o f

th e secon d par t of eac h test ru n fo r Uni t 3
. Tabl e 2- 8 present

s proces s dat

asummarie s an

d wast e feedrate s durin g th

e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac

k ga s sampling an

dmonitorin g o f

th e secon d par t o f eac h test run fo r Uni t 3
.

2- 6

VES01734 92.2. 3 Uni t 4 Tabl e 2- 9 presents proces s dat asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e P M stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e firs t par t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Unit 4
. Tabl e 2-1 0 presents proces s dat asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e HCI /CI 2 stac k ga s samplin g o f

th e secondpar

t o f eac h tes t ru n fo r Unit 4
. Tabl e 2-1 1 present

s proces s dat

asurnmarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e metal s stack

ga s samplin g o f

th e secon dpar

t o f eac h test ru n fo r Uni t 4
. Tabl e 2-1 2 presents proces s dat asummarie s an

dwast e feedrate s durin g th

e dioxins/furan s an dTH C stac

k ga s samplin g an

dmonitorin g o f

th e secon dpar t o f eac h test ru n fo r Unit 4
. 2. 3 Spikin g o

f Metal s an d Chlorin e Durin g th e test o f eac h incinerator , th

e metal s chromium , lead , andmercur y wer e spike dint o th e incinerator
. Th e spikin g wa s performe db y Veoha
. Detail s concernin g th e spikin g o f

metal s an d chlorin e ar

e presented i n Appendi x B
. Th e spikin g rate s o f

chlorin e durin g th

e HQVCI 2 stac

k samphng o f

th e secon dpar t o f eac h mn ar e presente d i n Tabl e 2-1 3 fo r Uni t 2 , Tabl e 2-1 4 fo r

Uni t 3 , an d2-1 5 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e spikin g rate s o f

chromium , lead , mercury , andchlorin e durin g th e metal s stac

k samphn g o f th e secondpar

t o f eac h ru n ar e presente

d i n Tabl e 2-1 6 fo r

Unit 2 , Tabl e 2-1 7 fo r

Uni t 3 , and2-1 8 fo r

Uni t 4
. Th e spikin g solution s o f

chromiu m(chromi c acid) andmercur y (mercuri c nitrate ) wer

e sampleda t th e beginning , a

t por t change , an da

t th e en do f th e EP A Metho d29 stac

k samplin g fo r metal s o f eac h run , an deac h o f thes e sample s wer

e analyze dfo r

chromiu mo

r mercury , respectively
. Th e analytical results fo r chromi c aci dan

dmercuri c nitrat

e solution s ar

e presented i n Table s 2-1 9 an

d2-2 0 fo r Unit 2 , Table s 2-2 1 an d2-22 fo r Uni t 3 , andTable s 2-2 3 an

d2-2 4 fo r Uni t 4
.

2- 7

VES01735 0Tabl e 2-1 . Uni t 2 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ru

n 1 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0

0 Ru n 2 10-9-1 3 09:45 -10 :53 Ru n 3 10 -10-13 09:1 5 -10:2 3 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Avg Mil l Ma x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M HR A 15,01

5 14,95

5 14,87

6 15,52

9 15,43

0 15,32

4 15,69

0 15,37

4 15,24

0 15,41

2 15,25

3 15,14

7 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,947.

7 1,277.2

. 899. 3 1,948.

6 1,353.

3 749. 5 2850.

8 1288.

3 299. 8 2,249.

0 1,306.

3 649. 5 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,009.

9 1,000.

2 982. 6 1,142.

2 997. 7 792.

3 1008.

4 998. 5 985.

5 1,053.

5 998. 8 920.

1 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 351.

7 270.

8 190.

5 424.

9 256.

5 131.

9 468.

9 296.

7 161.

2 415.

1 274.

6 161.

2 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 734.

9 738. 4 746. 0 739. 8 As h Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 501.

6 513. 2 494. 2 . 503. 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,73

5 1,70

8 1,64

0 1,73

3 1,69

1 1,65

0 1,75

9 1,69

8 1,63

8 1,74

2 1,69

9 1,64

3 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,89

4 1,88

0 1,86

7 1,89

3 1,88

0 1,86

9 1,90

0 1,88

2 1,87

0 1,89

6 1,88

1 1,86

9 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % O 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0,0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 2 ° F OM A 44 0 42

0 39

6 44

4 42

0 40

0 43

8 42

1 39 3 44

1 42

0 39

6

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r particulat

e matte r i n stack .
2Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL .



### 2- 8Tabl e 2-2 . Uni t 2 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/Cl 2 Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ru

n 1 10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4

0 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3

0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4

5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acti n HR

A 15,41

0 15,27

8 15,14

2 15,85

4 15,65

2 15,31

0 15,40

7 15,22

5 15,03

8 15,55 7 15,38 5 15,16 3 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OMA , . 2,546.

4 1,422.

1 299. 8 2,246.

8 1,500.

9 899. 6 2,321.

8 1,451,

9 374. 9 2371.

6 1458. 3 524. 8 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM

A 1.424.

2 1,370.

8 1,191.

0 1,129.

5 1.098.

7 1,051.

6 1.226.

6 1.200.

0 1,163.

7 1260.

1 1223. 1 1135. 5 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM

A 586. 1 485.

9 410.

3 527.

5 398.

2 307.

7 615.

4 440.

8 263.

7 576.

3 441. 6 327. 2 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

r 884.8 . 902. 0 880. 4 889. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 208. 0 207. 5 202. 8 206. 1 Sorben tFeedrat e lb/l b Cl j HR A 2.3

2 2.1 8 2.2 1 . 2.2 4 Carrie r Flui d Flowrat

e gal/l b Cl 2 HR

A 1.9

3 1.8 5 1.9 2 1.9 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,77 2 1,70

7 1,64

8 1,81

3 1,72

1 1,631

. 1,75 3 1,70

3 1,60

8 1,77

9 1,71 0 1,62 9 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,95 8 1,89

1 1,86

6 1,91

0 1,87

8 1,86

5 1,89

7 1,88

2 1,87

2 1,92

2 1,88 4 1,86 8 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0,0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.6

6 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

2 0.0 3 0.0 0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 ° F OM A 44 7 42

1 39

2 43

9 41

8 39

9 43

9 41

9 39

4 44

1 42 0 39 5

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g m n fo r HC1/C U i n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL .

2- 9

VES01735 2Tabl e 2-3 . Uni t 2 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 29 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metai s
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-18:4

3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:1

0 Run S

10-30-1 3 12:45-15:3

2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR A 15,60

2 15,37

5 14,94

6 15,85

4 15.48

7 15,12

6 15,63

6 15,43

8 15,03 8 15,69 7 15,43

3 15,03

7 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 2,546.

4 1,474.

6 299. 8 2,246.

8 1,513.

3 899. 6 2,547.

3 1,396.

5 0. 9 2,446.

8 1,461.

5 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,424.

2 1,289.

1 1,191. 0 1,129.

5 1,098.

9 1,051.

6 1,226.

6 1,164.

6 973. 4 1,260.

1 1,184.

2 1,072.

0 Speciall y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 615. 4 432.

6 0. 0 586.

1 425.

4 307.

7 , 732.

6 445.

3 234. 4 644.

7 434.

4 180.

7 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 895. 0 883. 1 891. 2 889. 8 SV M Feedrat

e lb/h r 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 61. 9 LV M Feedrat

e - Tota l Ib/h r 45. 8 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 LV M Feedrat

e - Pumpabl

e lb/h

r 45. 9 47. 3 45. 9 46. 3 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.0020 5 0.0020 6 0.0022 4 0.0021 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 209. 6 203. 6 205. 1 206. 1 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 °

F OM

A 44 7 42

0 39

2 43

9 41

9 39

9 43

9 41

9 39 4 44

1 42

0 39

5 PC C Temperatur

e °F OMA 1,77 2 1,70

1 1,62

2 1,82

1 1.70

8 1,60

7 1,79

8 . 1,70

5 1,60 8 1,79

7 1,70

5 1,61

2 SC C Temperatur

e T OM A 1,95 8 1,87

5 1,71

4 1,96

2 1,88

6 1,86

5 1,89

7 1,88

2 1,85 7 1,93

9 1,88

1 1,81

2 CO , Correcte

d t o 1% 0 2 ppmv d OMA 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 1.2

5 0.1

3 0.0 0 0.4

2 0.0

4 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure

d a s th e SDA (Spra

y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value s in bol d use d t o develo p OPL .

2-1 0Tabl e 2-4 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-8-1 3 15:40-18:5

5 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-15:4

0 Ru n 5 Octobe r 30,201 3 12:45-16:0

2 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 15,60

2 15,34

5 14.86

2 15.85

4 15,46

2 15,12

6 15,63

6 15,41

6 15,03

8 15,69

7 15,40

8 15,00

9 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 2546.

4 1470.

7 299. 8 2,246.

8 1,510.

2 899. 6 254

7 138

3 1 2,446.

8 1,454.

7 400. 1 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1424.

2 1286.

7 1191.

0 1,129.

5 1,099.

2 1,051.

6 122 7 114

0 97 3 1,260.

1 1,175.

2 1,072.

0 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 615.

4 429.

8 0. 0 586.

1 425.

5 307.

7 73 3 44

5 23

4 644.

7 433.

6 180.

7 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 897. 9 867. 4 874. 1 879. 8 Tota l Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r HR A 4,473.

4 4,317.

4 4,060.

4 4,369.

4 4,110.

4 2,944.

5 4,446.

7 4,119.

3 3,707.

4 4,429.

8 4,182.

4 3,570.

8 Tota l Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h

r HR A 3,564.

8 3,429.

5 3,241.

7 3,469.

0 3,276.

5 2,507.

5 3,519.

5 3,267.

4 2,930.

6 3,517.

8 3,324.

5 2,893.

3 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,77 2 1,70

1 1,62

2 1,82

1 . 1,70

7 1,59

4 1,79

8 1,70

1 1,60

8 1,79

7 1,70

3 1,60

8 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,95 8 1,87

5 1,71

4 1,96

2 1,88

4 1,86

5 1,89

9 1,88

3 1,85

7 1,94

0 1,88

1 1,81

2 Baghous e Inle tTemperature' ' ° F OM

A 44 7 42

0 39

2 43

9 41

9 39

9 43

9 41

9 39

4 44

1 42

0 39

5 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % O2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 1.6

2 0.1

5 0.0

0 0.5

4 0.0

5 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan

s i n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e an d Tota l Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrate

, maximum

, average , an d minimum

, include s th e averag e chromi c aci d solutio n feedrate

.
4Measure d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note: Value

s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL.

2-1 1Tabl e 2-5 . Uni t 3 - Summar y of Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Run l

10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2

5 Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2

5 Run 3

10-17-1 3 09:50-10:5

7 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Avg Mi n Ma x Avg Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 15,24

5 15,16

7 15,14

9 15,40

7 15,27

9 15.17

3 15,27

8 15,06

4 14,90

1 15,31

0 15,17

0 15,07

4 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM

A 1,636.

3 1,292.

9 890, 5 1,635.

2 955. 4 ' 368.

1 2,007.

3 1,357.

6 367 5 1,759.

6 1,202.

0 542. 2 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM

A 861.

1 847.

9 833.

4 887.

5 818.

2 742.

2 933.

0 875

3 810.

1 893.

8 847.

1 795.

2 Specialt y liqui d Wast

e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM

A 395.

6 307.

9 131.

9 381.

0 269.

1 190.

5 791.

2 457.

4 263.

7 522.

6 344.

8 195.

4 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h r OM

A 738.

3 742. 1 720. 7 733. 7 Ash Feedrat

e lb/h r OM

A 499.

9 510. 9 566. 5 525. 8 PC C Temperatur

e " F OM

A 1,76

6 1,70

7 1,65

0 1,72

6 1,70

4 1,68

4 1,74

2 1,70

4 1,61

4 1,74

4 1,70

5 1,64

9 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OMA 1,89

9 1,89

0 1,88

3 1,89

5 1,88

5 1,87 8 1,90

2 1,88

5 1,86

3 1,89

9 1,88

7 1,87

5 CO , Correcte

d t o 7% 0 2 ppmv d OM

A 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 2 ° F OM A 43

1 42

0 40

7 43

1 42

1 40

1 43 4 42

0 40

2 43

2 42

0 40

3

' Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r particulat

e matte r i n stack .
2Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperatur

e Note ; Value s i n hol d use d t o develo p OP L

2-1 2

VES01735 5Tabl e 2-6 . Uni t 3 - Summary of Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI 2 Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0

0 Ru

n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3

3 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3

5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi

s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR

A 15,51

7 15,39

5 15,08 8 15,36 0 15,20

4 14,84

0 15,22 8 15,19

3 15,11

6 15,37

8 15,26

4 15,01 5 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r OM A 2,530.

5 1,783.

5 442. 9 2,008.

4 1,563.

4 0. 0 2,231.

4 1,725.

3 1,261. 8 2,256.

8 1,690.

7 568. 2 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM

A 1,053.

0 977. 2 926. 8 1,212.

3 1,151.

9 1,039.

1 1,263.

1 1,163. 5 1,003.

3 1,176.

1 1,097.

6 989. 7 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 380. 9 177.

5 87. 9 556.

8 407. 7 322.

3 410. 3 248.

8 146.

5 449.

3 •278.

0 185. 6 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

r 904. 4 893. 8 861. 3 886. 5 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 207. 0 206. 0 201. 0 204. 7 Sorben tFeedrat e lb/l b C U HR

A 2.1

3 1.9 9 2.1 3 2.0 9 Carrie r Fluid Flowrat

e gal/l b Cl 2 HR

A 1.8

6 1.7 8 1.8 8 1.8 4 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,74 6 1,70

9 1,67 5 1,77 0 1,71 5 1,69

1 1,74 3 1,71

9 1,69

4 1,75

3 1,71

4 1,68 6 SC C Temperatur

e °F OM A 1,90 9 1,88 7 1,86 7 1,93 1 1,88 4 1,84

2 1,92

3 1,88

1 1,86 4 1,92

1 1,88 4 1,85 8 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0 0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 "

F OMA 43

0 . 42

0 39 5 43 3 42

0 38

0 42 9 41

5 38

5 43

1 41

8 38 6

1 Proces s dat a ar e tiie average

s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r HO/G 2 i

n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. . Note : Value s in bol d use d t o develo p OPL .

2-1 3Tabl e 2-7 . Uni t 3 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ru

n 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-16:5

0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:30-15:2

5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g M m Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR

A 15,54

7 15,27

4 15,08

8 15.42

9 15,23

0 14,84

0 15,27

7 15,13

3 14,98

3 15,41

7 15,21

2 14,97

0 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 2,531.

2 1,787.

6 442. 9 2,157.

8 1,685.

3 0. 0 2,231.

4 1,707.

4 1,261.

8 2,306.

8 1,726.

8 568.

2 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

i OM A 1,114.

5 1,043.

9 926. 8 1,212.

3 1,166.

5 1,039.

1 1,263.

1 1,197.

7 1,001.

3 1,196.

6 1,136.

0 989. 1 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 410. 3 202.

9 0. 0 556.

8 350.

0 0. 0 410.

3 244.

8 146.

5 459.

1 265.

9 48.

8 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

r 890. 9 888. 0 873. 6 884. 2 SV M Feedrat

e ib/h r 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 62. 3 LV M Feedrat

e - Tota l lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46.1 LV M Feedrat

e - Pumpabl

e lb/h r 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 46. 0 Mercur y Feedrat

e Ib/h r 0.0022 1 0.0021 4 0.0022 7 0.0022 1 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 204. 2 204. 6 203. 7 204. 2 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 °

F OMA 43

0 41

9 39

5 43

3 42

0 38

0 43

6 42

1 38

5 43

3 42

0 38

6 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,75 2 1,71

0 1,67

5 1,77

0 1,70

7 1,65

7 1,74

3 1,70

8 1,61

0 1,75

5 1,70

8 1,64

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,90 9 1,88

5 1,86

7 1,93

1 1,88

5 1,84

2 1,92

3 1,88

6 1,86

4 1,92

1 1,88

5 1,85

8 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0 0 O.O

O 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 o.o

o 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat a ar c th e average s fo r ti e duratio

n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r Metal s i n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Oude tTemperature

. Note: Value

s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL .

2-1 4Tabl e 2-8 . Uni t 3 - Summary of Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ru

n 2 10-161-1 3 14:0 0 -17:2 0 . Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:5 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:5 0 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Avg Min Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Avg Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M HR A 15,54

7 15,24

8 15,08

8 15,42

9 15,21

9 14,84

0 15,27

7 15,12

5 14,98

3 15,41

7 15,19

7 14,97

0 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OMA 2,531.

2 1,806.

5 442.

9 2,157.

8 1,688.

0 0. 0 2,231.

4 1,718.

8 1,261.

8 2,306.

8 1,737.

7 568.

2 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OMA 1,114.

5 1,052.

3 926.

8 1.212.

3 1,167.

4 1,039.

1 1,263.

1 1,188.

4 805.

7 1,196.

6 1,136.

0 923.

9 Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 410. 3 199.

6 0.

0 556.

8 340.

4 0.

0 410.

3 246.

2 146.

5 459,

1 262.

1 48.

8 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h r 887. 2 870. 5 872. 5 876. 7 Tota l Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h r HR A 4,288.

0 4,057. 1 2,491.

4 4,503.

5 4,250.

4 2,904.

3 4,437.

3 4,233.

2 3,734.

8 4,409.

6 4,180.

2 3,043.

5 Tota l Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrate 3 lb/h

r HR A 3,412.

8 3,209. 1 2,055.

4 3,613.

3 3,410.

5 2,467. 1 3,556.

0 3,393.0 3,238.

5 3,527.

4 3,337.

5 2,587. 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OMA 1,75 2 1,70

9 1,67

5 1,77

0 1,70

7 1,65

7 1,75

7 1,71

2 1,61

0 1,76

0 1,70

9 1,64

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,90 9 1.88

5 1,86

7 1,93

1 1,88

5 1,84

2 1,92

3 1,88

4 1.86

4 1,92

1 1,88

5 1,85

8 Baghous e Inle tTemperature ' ° F OMA . 43 0 41

9 39

5 43

3 42

1 38

0 43

6 42

0 38

5 43

3 42

0 38

6 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g tu n fo r Dioxins/Furan

s i n stack .
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexacbloroetliane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e an d Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrate

, maximum

, average , an d minimum

, mclude s th e averag e chromi c aci d solutio n feedrate

.
4Measure d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note: Value

s in bol d use d t o develo p OPL

2-1 5

VES01735 8Tabl e 2-9 . Uni t 4 - Summar y of Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 5 Stac k Samplin g fo r P M
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4

2 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 09:3 5 -10:4 0 Ru n 4 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5

5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e ACF M HR A 37,75

5 37,63

2 37,33

3 37,99

7 37,82

4 37,47

9 37,64

7 36,94

9 36,51

8 37,80

0 37,46

8 37,11

0 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2,080.

6 1,899.

6 1,646.

9 2,180.

2 1,901.

0 1,730.

0 1,957.

9 1,896.

8 1,807.

7 2,072.

9 1,899.

2 1,728.

2 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kiln Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 1,124.

8 1,101.

4 1,081.

3 1,403.

2 1,098.

1 1,010.

0 1,200.

5 1,108.

9 996. 8 1,242.

8 1,102.

8 1,029.

4 Liqui d Wast e t o SC C Feedrat

e lb/h

r OM A 1,185.

5 1,095.

6 1,003.

0 1,158.

5 1,100.

7 1,026.

9 1,153.

8 1,102.

8 1,068.

8 1,166.

0 1,099.

7 1,032.

9 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 565.

8 568. 6 553. 8 562. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 6,286.

7 6,408. 0 5,992. 6 6,229. 1 As h Feedrat

e lb/h r OM A 4,806.

0 4,835. 6 4,689. 9 4,777. 2 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,63

1 1,59

1 1,53 7 1,62

3 1,57

4 1,50

3 1,60

1 1,55

9 1,50

8 1,61

8 1,57

5 1,51

6 SC C Temperatur

e " F OM

A 1,90 9 1,88

5 1,86

6 1,90

5 1,88

6 1,86

3 1,89

6 1,88

2 1,87

0 1,90

3 1,88

4 1,86

6 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.3 3 0.1

4 0.0

0 0.2

6 0.0

9 O.O

O 0.2

1 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.1

0 0.0

0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 2 ° F OM A 40 2 39

8 39

2 40

3 39 7 39

1 40 7 . 40

1 39

6 40

4 39

9 39

3 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r OM A 6. 7 6.

2 5.

9 6.

7 6.

2 5.

9 7.

0 6.

2 5.

7 6.

8 6.

2 5.

8

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r particulat

e matte r i n stack .
2Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperatur

e Note : Value s in bol d use d t o develo p OP L

2-1 6Tabl e 2-10 . Uni t 4 - Summar y o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A Stac k Samplin g fo r HCI/CI- . Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ru

n 1 10-23-1 3 12:36-13:3

6 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-13:3

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:35-14:3

5 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR

A 38,04

2 37,93

5 37,85

7 37,26 5 37,17

0 37,06

3 36,87

2 36,75

4 36,57

2 37,39

3 37,28

6 37,16

4 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 2,105.

9 1,943.

7 0. 0 2,057.

1 1,996.

5 1,863.

0 2,068.

1 1,999.

6 1,942.

1 2,077.

0 1,980.

0 1,268.

4 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,224.

9 1,167.

0 0. 0 1.230.

8 1,205.

4 1.172.

2 1,294.

3 1.201.

0 1.094.

0 1.250.

0 1.191.

2 755. 4 Liqui d Wast e t o SC C Feedrat

e lb/h

r OM A 1,261.

5 1,165.

6 0. 0 1,240.

6 1,203.

1 1,126.

5 1,238.

0 1,196.

3 1,171.

4 1,246.

7 1,188.

3 766. 0 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 1 lb/h

r 860. 0 857. 0 843. 0 853. 3 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r 6,093. 0 5,448. 0 5739. 0 5,760. 0 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 203. 0 203. 5 203. 2 203. 2 Sorben tFeedrat e Lb/l b C k HR

A Z2

3 2.0 7 2.0 7 2.1 3 Carrie r Flui d Flowrat

e Gal/l b Cl 2 HR

A 3.1

6 3.0 7 3.0 7 3.1 0 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,63 5 1,58

9 1,49 3 1,62 3 1,56

9 1,50

7 1,56

7 1,51

3 1,46

0 1,60

9 1,55

7 1,48

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,90 9 1,88

3 1,80 1 1,90 1 1,88

0 1,83

8 1,90

5 1,87

8 1,84

7 1,90

5 1,88

0 1,82

8 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

1 0,0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

9 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

8 0.0

0 Baghous e inle tTemperature" ' °F OM A 40 9 39

8 38 3 40 3 39

9 39

3 40

6 40

0 39

2 40

6 39

9 38

9 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r OM A 6. 7 6.

0 0. 0 6. 5 6.

2 6.

1 6.

7 6.

2 6.

0 6.

6 6.

1 4.

0

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r HCl/Cl i i

n stack ,
2Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL.

2-1 7Tabl e 2-11 . Uni t 4 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e EP A Metho d 2 9 Stac k Samplin g fo r Metal s
Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-23-1 3 12:36-15:2

0 Su n 2

10-24-1 3 12:35-15:1

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Avg M

m Ma

x Av

g Min Ma

x Av g Min Ma x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat e acf m HR

A 38,04

2 37,65

9 37,01

0 37,26 7 37,08

7 36,86

4 38,29

7 37,19

9 36,57

2 37,86

9 37,31

5 36,81

5 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Ki m Feedrat

e lb/h

r OMA 2,105.

9 1,978.

5 0. 0 2,113.

9 1,986.

6 1,711.

7 2,072.

2 1,999.

0 1,939.

2 2,097.

3 1,988.

0 1,217.

0 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h

r OM A 1,232.

7 1,189.

2 0. 0 1,239.

1 1,201.

2 1,159. 0 1,340.

2 1,201.

8 1,094.

0 1,270.

7 1,197.

4 751. 0 Liqui d Wast e t o SC C Feedrat

e lb/h

r OM A 1,261.

5 1,186.

2 0. 0 1,240.

6 1,201.

5 1,077.

4 1,238.

0 1,196.

2 1,167.

1 1,246.

7 1,194.

6 748. 1 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

i 862. 7 849. 0 856. 5 856. 1 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e Ib/h

r 5,251. 5 5,598. 4 5345. 0 5,398. 3 SV M Feedrat

e lb/h r 62. 2 61. 6 62. 2 62. 0 LV M Feedrate-Tota

l lb/h r 46. 2 46. 3 46. 0 46. 2 • LV M Feedrat

e - Pumpabl

e lb/h r • 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 45. 9 Mercur y Feedrat e lb/h r 0.040 2 0.040 0 0.040 3 0.040 2 Tota l Chlorin e Feedrat e lb/h r 205. 3 204. 1 205. 5 205. 0 Baghous e Inle tTemperature 3 °

F OM

A 40 9 39

9 38 3 40

9 39

9 39

0 41

0 39

9 38

8 41

0 39

9 38 7 Carbo n Injectio n Rat e lb/h r OM A 6. 7 6.

1 0.

0 6. 7 6.

2 5.

9 6.

9 6.

2 5.

9 6.

8 6.

2 3.

9 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM

A 1,66 6 1,58

2 1,49 3 1,62

3 1,57

1 1,50

7 1,60

2 1,52

5 1,46

0 1,63

1 1,55

9 1,48

7 SC C Temperatur

e ° F OMA 1,92

8 1,88

5 1,80

1 1,90

1 1,87

9 1,83

8 1,91

2 1,87

9 1,83

1 1,91

4 1,88

1 1,82

3 CO , Correcte

d t o 1% 0 2 ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

1 0.0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

7 0.0

0

1 Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r metal s i n stack .
1 Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e include s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Measure

d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value s in bol d use d t o develo p OPL.

2-1 8Tabl e 2-12 . Uni t 4 - Summary o f Proces s Data 1 an d Feedrate s Durin g th e SW-84 6 Metho d 0023 A Stac k Samplin g fo r Dioxins/Furan s Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Run l

10-23-1 3 12:36-15:5

0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-15:4

5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:4 1 Averag e Operatin g Paramete

r Unit

s Basi s Ma x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Ma

x Av

g Mi n Stac k Ga s Flowrat

e ACF M HR A 38,04

2 37,54

7 36,88

1 37,26

7 37,02

8 36,45

4 38.29

7 37,32

5 36,57

2 37,86

9 37,30

0 36,63

5 Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h r OM A 2,105.

9 1,982.

8 0. 0 2,113.

9 1,950.

9 1,711.

7 2,072.

2 1,998.

3 1,939.

2 2,097.

3 1,977.

4 1,217.

0 High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e t o Kil n Feedrat e lb/h r OM A . 1,232.

7 1,190.

9 0. 0 1,239.

1 1,201.

0 1,159.

0 1,340.

2 1,200.

9 1,094.

0 1,270.

7 1,197.

6 751.

0 Liqui d Wast e t o SC C Feedrat

e lb/h

r OM A 1,261,

5 1,187.

5 0. 0 1,240.

6 1,201.

3 1,077.

4 1,238.

0 1,196.

9 1,167.

1 1,246.

7 • 1,195.

2 748.1 Containerize

d Solid s Wast e Feedrate 2 lb/h

r 862. 6 • 841. 6 854. 2 852. 8 Bul k Solid s Wast e Feedrat e lb/h

r 5,322. 4 5,090. 8 5,284. 2 5,232. 5 Tota l Wast e Feedrat

e t o PCC 3 lb/h r HR A 10,621.

4 9,551. 1 7,192. 1 10,662. 8 9,512.

7 7,097.

6 10,610.

4 9,407.6 6,913.

6 10,631.

5 9,490.

5 7,067.

8 Tota l Pumpabl

e Wast e Feedrat e t o PCC ' lb/h

r HR A 3,466.

7 3,418,

2 3,095. 1 3,465.

0 3,430.

7 3,151.

6 3,473.

2 3,447.

0 3,129.

6 3,468.

3 3,432.

0 3,125. 4 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e t o SC C (Pumpable

) lb/h r HR A 1,201.

9 1,184.

2 1,078.

0 1,207.

0 1,197.

8 1,082.

2 1,199.

5 1,192.

4 1,077.

6 1,202.

8 1,191.

5 1,079.

3 PC C Temperatur

e ° F OM A 1,66

6 1,58

0 1,49

3 1,62

6 1,57

5 1,50

7 1,60

2 1,52

7 1,46

0 1,63

2 1,56

1 1,48

7 SC C Temperatur

e o p OM

A 1,92

8 1,88

5 1,80

1 1,91

0 1,88

1 1,83

8 1,91

2 1,87

9 1,83

1 1,91

7 1,88

1 1,82

3 Baghous e Inle tTemperature" ° F OM A 41 0 40

0 38

3 40

9 39

9 39

0 41

3 39

9 38

8 41

1 39

9 38

7 Carbo n Injectio

n Rat e lb/h r OM A 6. 8 6.

2 0.

0 7.

1 6.

2 5.

9 6.

9 6.

2 5.

9 6.

9 6.

2 3.

9 CO , Correcte

d t o 7 % 0 2 • ppmv d OM A 0.2 3 0.0

7 0.0

0 0.2

1 0.0

6 0.0

0 0.2

7 0.0

8 0.0

0 0.2

4 0.0

7 0.0

0

' Proces s dat a ar e th e average s fo r th e duratio n o f th e emission

s samplin g ru n fo r Dioxins/Furan

s i n stack .
1 Containerize

d Wast e Feedrat e mclude s th e spike s o f hexachloroethane

, lea d nitrate , an d mercuri c nitrat e solution .
3 Tota l Wast e Feedrat e t o PC C an d Tota l Pumpabl e Wast e Feedrat e t o PCC , maximum

, average , an d mmimum

, iuclud e th e averag e chromi c aci d solutio n feedrate

.
4Measure d a s th e SD A (Spra y Dryer/Absorber

) Outle tTemperature

. Note : Value

s i n bol d use d t o develo p OPL .

2-1 9

VES01736 2Tabl e 2-13 . Uni t 2 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/Cl 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) | Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -16:4 0 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3 0 Ru n 5 ' 1 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4 5 | Chlorin e 200-25 0 197. 9 203. 1 197. 9 |

Tabl e 2-14 . Uni t 3 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCl/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -15:0 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -13:3 3 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -10:3 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 203. 1 203. 3 197. 9

Tabl e 2-15 . Uni t 4 - Chlorin e Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e HCI/CI 2 Stac k Samplin g . Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 1 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -13:3 6 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -13:3 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -14:3 5 Chlorin e 200-25 0 197. 9 197. 9 197. 9

2-20

VES01736 3Tabl e 2-16 . Uni t 2 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-8-1 3 15:4 0 -18:4 3 Ru n 3 10-10-1 3 12:3 0 -15:1 0 Ru n 5 10-30-1 3 12:4 5 -15:3 2 Chromiu m 40-4 5 45. 8 47. 3 45. 8 Lea d 60-6 5 61. 9 61. 7 62. 0 Mercur y 0.00 1 - 0.00 3 0.0019 6 0.0019 6 0.0020 4 Chlorin e 20 0 - 25 0 199. 7 199. 2 200. 2

Tabl e 2-17 . Uni t 3 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g 

# I Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) 

# I Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Ru n 2 10-16-1 3 14:0 0 -16:5 0 Ru n 3 10-17-1 3 12:3 0 -15:2 5 Ru n 4 10-18-1 3 09:3 5 -12:2 0 Chromiu m 40-4 5 46. 3 46. 1 45. 7 I Lea d 60-6 5 62. 1 62. 5 62. 2 Mercur y 0.00 1 - 0.00 3 0.00204 0.0020 0 0.0020 9 Chlorin e 200-25 0 200. 3 201. 7 200. 7

Tabl e 2-18 . Uni t 4 - Spikin g Rate s Durin g th e Metal s Stac k Samplin g Spikin g Constituen t Spikin g Rat e (lbs/hr ) Spikin g Constituen t Targe t Run l 10-23-1 3 12:3 6 -15:2 0 Ru n 2 10-24-1 3 12:3 5 -15:1 5 Ru n 3 10-25-1 3 13:3 5 -16:1 1 Chromiu m 40-4 5 46. 0 46. 0 45. 8 Lea d 60-6 5 62. 0 61. 1 62. 0 Mercur y 0.02-0.0 6 0.0393 0.038 8 0.039 4 Chlorin e 20 0 - 25 0 200. 0 197. 2 200. 3

2-2 1

VES01736 4Tabl e 2-19 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r tb e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Chromiu m C O A Concentratio n Analytica l Result C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 178,000 178,000 174,000 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 178,88 1 172,000 178,87 1 174,00 0 178,88 1 173,00 0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 169,000 178,000 170,00 0

Tabl e 2-20 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n Run l Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (pg/ml ) (mg/kg ) (Ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (Mg/ml) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 1,96 0 2,37 0 2,21 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 2,323 2,05 0 2,32 3 2,15 0 2,32 3 2,12 0 En d o f Metho d 2

9 Sampl e 2,39 0 1,950 2,25 0

2-2 2

VES01736 5Tabl e 2-21 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Chromiu m C O A Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 176,00 0 176,000 176,00 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 179,137 173,000 179,137 1.79,00 0 179,137 172,00 0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 177,000 174,000 173,00 0

Tabl e 2-22 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (Ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 2,42 0 2,46 0 2,48 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 2,323 2,38 0 2,323 2,39 0 2,32 3 2,50 0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 2,38 0 2,48 0 2,48 0

2-2 3Tabl e 2-23 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Chromiu m C O A Concentratio n Analytica l Result C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t C O A

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 171,000 173,000 169,00 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 179,13 7 175,000 179,13 7 172,000 179,00 9 172,00 0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 169,000 174,000 176,000

Tabl e 2-24 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r th e Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n Run l Ru n 2 Run 3 Mercur y Calculate d Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t Calculate d

Concentratio n Analytica l Resul t (Mg/mi ) (mg/kg ) (Ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) (ug/ml ) (mg/kg ) Beginnin g o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 21,30 0 19,700 22,00 0 Middl e o f

Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 23,22 8 18,700 23,22 8 19,90 0 23,22 8 21,30 0 En d o f Metho d 2 9 Sampl e 19,300 21,00 0 21,40 0

2-2 4

### 3. 0 Sampling , Analysis , an d Monitorin g Procedure s Th e subsequen

t CP T wa s performe da

t on e tes t conditio n o n eac h o f

th e thre e incinerator s to demonstrat

e syste mperformanc e an

dto establis h appropriat

e operatin g paramete

r limit s (OPLs ) fo r

al l o f th e applicabl e standards o f th e HW C MACT
. Th e CP T include dthre e replicate samplin g run s on eac

h incinerator

a t th e on e tes t condition
. Tabl e 3- 1 summarize s th e parameters tha t wer e measureddurin g th

e tes t o f eac h o f th e thre e incinerator s andth

e frequenc y of measurement . The CP T wa s conductedi n accordanc e wit h th e comprehensiv e performanc e test plan s fo r Unit s 2 , 3 , and4 (i.e
. th

e CP T Plan ) andQualit

y Assuranc e Projec t

Plan (QAPjP ) dated Septembe r 25,201 3 tha

t wer e approve db y EP A Regio n 5
. 3. 1 Samplin g Location s an d Procedure s Sample s wer

e collecte do f

solid , liquid , an dga

s stream s durin g th

e CPT
. Tabl e 3- 2 summarize s th

e samplin g methods fo r

eac h strea

mandth e parameters tha

t wer e determined
. Refe r to th e QAPj P fo r

mor e detaile ddescription s o f th e method s an

dth e qualit y contro l activitie s fo r

eac h method
. Sectio n 5. 0 presents adiscussio n o f the QA/Q C activitie s performe d fo r th e CPT
. 3.1. 1 Liquid s Samplin g Procedure s Sample s o f

th e liqui dwast

e feed s wer

e collecte dever

y 1 5 minute s durin g eac

h o f th e three run s o f

th e CP T fo r

eac h o f th e three incinerator s beginnin g a t th e star t o f stac k samplin g throug

h completio n o f

stac k samplin g fo r

bot h the first an dsecondparts o f

th e CPT
. Individua l sample s (i.e. , sub-samples ) wer e collecte dever

y 1 5 minute s throughou

t th e test , an dcomposite dfo r

analysis
. Sample s o f

th e liqui dwast

e feed s wer

e collecte da

t 15-minut e interval s durin g th

e collectio n o f

th e Metho d5 samplin g trai n o f th e firs t par t o f each ru n o f

th e test, an ddurin g th e collectio n o f

th e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A sampling train s o f th e secon dpar t o f eac h ru n o f th e test . Composite sample s wer e preparedo f

th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac

h o f th e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d 0023 A samplin g times
. Al l o f th e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dsample s fro mth

e firs t par t and th e secondpar

t o f th e CP T wer

e analyzedfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content, moisture , density , an dviscosity
. The composit e liqui dwast

e fee dsample s collecte ddurin g th e Metho d29 stac

k samplin g wer

e als o analyze dfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an d mercury)
.

3- 1

VES01736 8I n additio n to th

e collectio n o f

sub-sample s ever

y 1 5 minute s o f

th e liqui dwastes , individua l sample s wer

e collecte dan

darchive dfo r

further analysis , i f

required
. Sample s o f

th e chromiuman

dmercur y spikin g solution s wer

e collecte di n eac

h run o f th e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerator
. A t

th e beginning , middl e (a

t por t change) , an

d endo f th e Metho d29 samplin g o f th e secondpar

t o f th e test , sample s o f

th e chromiu man

d mercur y spikin g solution s wer

e collected
. Th e individua l sample s o f th e chromiu man

d mercur y spikin g solution s collecte ddurin g eac h Metho d2 9 samplin g ru n o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerator

wer e analyze dfo r

chromiu mo r

mercury , respectively
. A fourth sampl e o f tli e chromiu mandmercur

y spikin g solution s wa

s collecte da

t th e completio n o f

th e Metho d 0023 A samplin g train
. Thi s fourt h sampl e wa s archive d(i.e. , not

analyzed)
. Liqui dwast

e sample s wer

e collecte dupstrea

mo f an y meta l spikin g location
. Spli t sample s o f

th e composit

e liqui dwast

e fee dandtli e chromiu

man dmercur y spikin g solution s fro m on e run wer e take n b y th e Illinoi s EP A and/o

r U.S
. EP A Regio n 5
.

3- 2

VES01736 9Tabl e 3-1 . Measuremen t Frequenc y Sampl e Frequenc y fo r Stream/Parameter s th e Subsequen tCP T Firs tPar t Secon d Par t Liqui d Wast e Fee d As h 3 3 Chlorin e • 3 3 Moistur e 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Viscosity , Densit

y 3 3 Metal s 3 ' Soli d Wast e Feed-Containerize d an d Bul k (Uni t4 ) As h - 3 3 Chlorin e 3 3 Moistur e 3 3 Heatin g Valu e 3 3 Metal s 3 ' Spikin g Materials 2 Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n 3 Lea d Soli d Spikin g Materia l 3 Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n 3 Chlorin e Soli d Spikin g Materia l (i f spiked ) 3 Stac k Ga s Metal s . 3 1 Particulat

e Matte r 3 HC1/C1 2 3 Dioxins/Furan s 3 co 2 , o 2 Continuou s Continuous 3 Tota l Hydrocarbon s Continuous 3 Moistur e Concurren twith Concurren twit h isokineti c samplin g isokineti c samplin g
• co,o 2 4 Continuou s Continuou s

1 Analysi s is fo r As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , and Hg .

2Eac h collecte d sampl e o f th e mercur

y an d chromiu m spikin g solution s were analyze d fo r th e targe tspikin g metal . Sample s o f

th e lea d and chlorin e spikin g material s wer e archived .

3 Allowin g fo r hourl y calibratio n o f the TH C monitor .

4Plantmonitors .

3- 3

VES01737 0Tabl e 3-2 . Samplin g Method s Strea m Sampling Metho d Samplin g Frequenc y Compositin g

Approac h Analytica l

Parameter

s Liqui d Wast

e Fee d Unit s 2 an d 3 Low-Bt u High-Bt u Liqui d (Specialty

) Wast e Uni t4 Low-Bt u t o Kil n High-Bt u t o Kil n Liqui d Wast

e t o SC C Ta p (Metho d S004 ) Firstpar

tofth e tes

t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d 5 samplin

g Secon d par to f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie d Metho

d 26A , Method 29, an

d Metho d 0023 A -samplin g Subsample s fro m eac h tes tperiod composite

d As h

Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Valu e Densit y Viscosit y Metals 1

Soh d Wast

e Fee d Unit s 2 an d 3 Containerize

d Uni t4 Containerize

d

- Bul k Gra b o r Scoo p (Metho d S007 ) - Solid s Firstpar

tof th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Metho d 5 samplin

g Secon d par to f th e tes t conditio n - Ever y 1 5 Minute s Durin g Modifie d Metho

d 26A , Method 29 , an

d Method 0023

A samplin g Subsample s fro m eac h tes tperio d composite

d As h

Chlorin e Moistur e Heatin g Value Metals 1

Chromiu m Spikin g Solutio n Ta p (Metho d S004 ) Secon

d par to f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning, middle, an

d en d of Metho d 2 9 samplin

g End of Metho d 0023 A samplin g Subsample s collecte d durin g Method 2

9 samplin

g analyze d Subsampl

e collecte

d a ten d of Metho d 0023 A samplin

g archive d Chromiu

m

Mercur y Spikin g Solutio n Gra b Secon d par to f th e tes t conditio n - Beginning

, middle , an

d en d o f Method 2

9 samplin

g En d o f Method 0023

A samplin g Subsample s collecte d during Method 2

9 samplin

g analyze d Subsampl

e collecte

d a ten d of Metho d 0023 A samplin

g archive d Mercur

y

3-4

VES01737 1Tabl e 3-2 . (continued ) Samplin g Method s Strea m Samplin g Metho d Samplin g Frequenc y Compositin g

Approac h Analytical

Parameter

s

Lea d an d Chlorin

e Spikin g Material

s Gra

b Secon d par tof th e tes t conditio n - Beginning, middle, an

d en d of Method 2

9 samplin

g En d of Method 0023

A samplin g None-Archiv e Archive

EP A Method 2 Concurren twit h isokinetic samplin

g for EP A Method

s 5 , 29 , an d SW-846 Metho

d 0023 A N R Flowrat e

EP A Method 3 A Concurren twit h isokinetic samplin

g - Firs tan d Secon d Part s ofth e Tes

t N R 0 2 , C0 2

EP A Method 4 Concurren twit h isokinetic.samplin

g - Firs tan d Secon d Part s o f th e Tes t N R Moistur e

Stac k Ga s EP A Method 5 1 + hou r collecte

d isokinetican

y - First Par tof th e Tes t N R P M Stac k Ga s Modifie d EP A Method 26 A 1

+ hou r collecte

d isokineticall

y a tsingl e poin t- Secon d Par tof th e Tes t N R HC1/C1 2
EP A Metho

d 2 9 2

+ hou r collecte

d isokineticall

y - Secon

d Par tof th e Tes t N R Metal s 1
SW-846 Method 0023

A 3+hou

r collecte

d isokineticall

y - Secon

d Par tof th e Tes t N R Dioxins/Furan s

EP A Metho

d 25A Concurren twit h isokinetic samplin

g - Secon d Par tof th e Test N R TH C
Plan tCEM S Continuou s N R CO,0 2

1 Analysi s fo r As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , an d H g onl y i n sample

s fro m th e secon d par tof th e tes tconditio

n collecte

d durin g Metho d 2 9 stac k sampling

. N R= No tRequire d

3- 5

VES01737 23.1. 2 Solid s Samplin g Procedure s Sample s o f

th e containerize dsoli dwast e fee dfe dt

o Unit s 2,3 , an

d4 , an dthe bul k solid s fe dt

o Uni t 4 , wer e collecte dever

y 1 5 minute s durin g th

e collectio n of

th e Metho d5 samphng trai n of

the first par t o f each ru n o f

th e test, an ddurin g th

e collectio n o f

th e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , andMetho d0023 A samplin g train s o f th e secondpar

t o f eac h ru n o f th e test . Composit

e sample s wer

e prepare d o f

th e sample s collecte ddurin g eac h o f th e Metho d5 , Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A samplin g times
. Al l o f th e composit

e soli dwast

e fee dsample s fro mth

e firs t par t an dth e secondpar

t o f th e CP T wer e analyze dfo r

ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content, an

dmoisture
. The composit

e soli dwast

e fee d sample s collecte ddurin g th e Metho d2 9 stac

k samplin g wer

e als o analyze dfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. I n additio n t

o th e collectio n o f

sub-sample s ever

y 1 5 minute s o f

th e soli dwastes , individua l sample s wer

e collecte dandarchive dfo r furthe r analysis , i f

required
. Spike s o f soli dlea dan dchlorin e wer

e adde d t o th e containerizedsoli dwast e i n th e tes t o f eac h incinerator
. Sample s o f th e lead(a s leadnitrate) an

dth e chlorin e (a

s hexachloroethane) wer

e collecte ddurin g th

e Metho d29 stac

k samplin g i n th

e secon dpar t o f th e test . Thre

e gra b sample s o f th e chlorin e andlea dspikin g material s wer e collecte da

t th e begimiing , middl e (a

t por t change) , andendo f

th e Metho d29 samphng o f the secondpar

t o f th e test . A fourth sample o f th e leadan d chlorin e spikin g material s wa s collecte da

t th e completio n o f

th e Metho d0023 A samplin g trai n i n th e secondpar

t o f th e test . Al l sample s o f

th e leadan dchlorin e spikin g material s wer e archive d (i.e. , not analyzed)
. Sample s o f

th e composit

e soli dwast

e feed s an

dth e chlorin e an dleadspikin g solution s fro mon

e run wer e take n b y th e Illinoi s EP A and/o

r U.S
. EP A Regio n 5
. 3.1. 3 Stac k

Ga s Samplin g Procedure s Stac k ga s emission s wer

e sample dfo r

determinatio n o f

th e parameter

s indicate di n Table s 5- 1 and5-2
. Th e stac k sample s collecte dusin g isokineti c samplin g method s wer e particulat e matte r b y EP A Metho d5 , HC I an dCl 2usin g aModifie dMetho d26A , metal s b y EP A Metho d29 , anddioxins/furan s b y SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Tabl e 3-3 , Tabl e 3-4 , andTabl e 3- 5 presen t summarie s o f

th e samplin g dat

afo r th e isokineti c samplin g train s fo r th e CP T testin g o f Uni t 2 , Uni t 3 , an dUnit 4 , respectively
.

3- 6

VES01737 3Tabl e 3-3 . Uni t 2 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytical Paramete r Dat e Tim e Average Stac k Temperatur

e CF) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga

s Moistur e (% ) (vo

l % ) co 2 (vo l % ) Av g Flowrate (acfm ) Av g Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti c Samplin g Rat e (% )

1 P M 10-8-1 3 11:50-13:0

0 39

0 30.5

0 41.

2 11.5

6 6.3

5 14,79

6 5,39

5 40.81 5 97. 9 1 HC1/C1 2 10-8-1 3 15:40-16:4

0 391 29.9 7 45. 1 10.0 8 7.9

5 14,53

7 4,94

2 37.38

4 103.

5 1 Metal

s 10-8-1

3 15:40-18:4

3 38

9 • 31.4 1 45. 5 10.0

8 7.9

5 15,23

5 5,15

6 84.95

2 107.1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-8-1

3 15:40-18:5

5 38

7 30.0

5 44.

7 10.0

8 7.9

5 14,57

8 5,01

7 121.16

4 104.

6 2 P M 10-9-1 3 09:45-10:5

3 39

0 31.0

7 41.6 11.2 3 6.5

6 15,07

0 5,45 1 42.35 6 100.

5

3 P M 10-10-1 3 09:15-10:2

3 39

1 30.4

2 42.0 11.4 8 6.2

8 14,75

3 5,28

7 41.27

8 101.

0
3 HCUC1 2 10-10-1 3 12:30-13:3

0 39

6 31.9

5 45.

9 10.3

8 7.5

0 15,49

8 5,15

0 37.29

0 99.

0 3 Metal

s 10-10-1

3 12:30-15:1

0 39

3 31.3

6 45.8 10.3 8 7.5

0 15,212 5,081 78.95 1 101. 0 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-10-1

3 12:30-15:4

0 39

6 32.0

5 45.

3 10.3

8 7.5

0 15,54

4 5,22

5 119.56

8 99. 1

5 HC1/C1 2 10-30-1 3 12:45-13:4

5 39

2 31.21 43.8 10.5 0 7.2

5 15,13

8 5,22

5 36.87

9 96. 1 5 Metal

s 10-30-1

3 12:45-15:3

2 38

6 31.0

6 43.8 10.5 0 7.2

5 15,06

4 5,23

6 79.60

7 97.9 Dioxins/Furan

s 10-30-1

3 12:45-16:0

2 38

9 33.1 0 42.9 10.5 0 7.2

5 16,05

6 5,65

0 124.92

1 95.

3

3- 7

VES01737 4Tabl e 3-4 . Uni t 3 - Summar y o f Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytical Paramete r Dat e Tim e Averag e Stac k Temperatur

e (°F ) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga

s Moistur e (% ) o 2 (vo l % ) co 2 (vo l % ) Av g Flowrate (acfhi ) Av g

Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokineti c Samplin g Rat e (% ) 1 P M 10-15-1 3 13:16-14:2

5 36

5 29.9

4 38.

3 12.8

7 5.3 1 14,52 3 5,67

5 41.22

9 98.9

2 P M 10-16-1 3 11:15-12:2

5 36

6 30.7

5 36.

2 13.3

8 4.9

6 14,91 6 6,03 4 42.46 1 96. 2 2 HCI/C1 2 10-16-1 3 14:00-15:0

0 36

8 30.9

8 41.6 11.1 9 6.8

8 15,02

8 5,54

2 36.08

8 101.

6 2 Metal s 10-16-1

3 14:00-16:5

0 36

7 30.6

8 43.

5 11.19 6.8

8 14,88

2 5,319 71.70 8 103.

6 2 Dioxins/Furan s 10-16-1

3 14:00-17:2

0 36

7 30.9

2 42. 9 11.19 6.8 8 14,99

6 5,42

0 106.30

3 102.

5

3 P M 10-17-1 3 09:50-10:5

7 36

8 30.6

6 41.0 11.7 4 6.0

2 14,87

0 5,54

9 41.92 1 103. 3 3 HC1/C1 2 10-17-1 3 12:30-13:3

3 36

6 30.3

5 43.

2 10.7

2 7.3

6 14,721 5,29 3 34.59

7 101.

9 3 Metal s 10-17-1

3 12:30-15:2

5 36

7 30.2

2 44.

5 10.7

2 7.3

6 14,65

8 5,15

0 69.01 6 102. 9 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-17-1

3 12:30-15:5

5 36

7 30.7

2 44.4 10.7 2 7.3

6 14,901 5,24 8 102.72

4 102.

3

4 HC1/C1 2 10-18-1 3 09:35-10:3

5 36

8 32.0

6 43.

4 10.8

7 7.2

6 15,54

9 5,57

9 35.24 1 98. 5 4 Metal s 10-18-1

3 09:35-12:2

0 36

8 31.5

2 44. 1 10.8 7 7.2

6 15,29

2 5,41

4 71.54

0 101.

5 Dioxins/Furan

s 10-18-1

3 09:35-12:5

0 36

8 30.5

9 43.

7 10.8

7 7.2

6 14,83

9 5,29

0 102.62

4 101.

4

3- 8Tabl e 3-5 . Uni t 4 - Summar y of Isokineti c Samplin g

Ru n Analytica l Paramete r Dat e Tim e Averag e Stac k Temperature CF ) Velocit

y (ft/sec ) Flu e Ga s Moisture (% ) o 2 (vo l % ) co 2 (vol'% ) Av g

Flowrat e (acfm ) Av g Flowrat e (dscfm ) Volum e a tMete r (dscf ) Isokinetic Samplin g Rat e (% )

1 P M 10-23-1 3 09:30-10:4

2 37

4 57.5

5 39.

4 12.2

2 5.5

9 43,27

5 16,48

3 38.18 1 97.9
1 HC1/C1 2 10-23-1 3 12:36-13:3

6 37

7 60.3

0 39.

6 12.2

7 5.8

6 45,34

5 17,15

7 39.93

5 99. 1 1 Metal

s 10-23-1

3 12:36-15:2

0 37

1 57.2

6 39.

7 12.2

7 5.8

6 43,06 1 16,38 2 76.06

8 100. 1 1 Dioxins/Furan s 10-23-1

3 12:36-15:5

0 37

0 55.12 39. 2 12.2

7 5.8

6 41,45

5 15,919 110.791 100. 7

2 HC1/C1 2 10-24-1 3 12:35-13:3

5 37

7 57.91 38.6 12.3 7 5.7

4 43,55

0 16,82

4 39.26

4 99.

3 2 Metal

s 10-24-1

3 12:35-15:1

5 37

0 57.7

2 38.6 12.3 7 5.7

4 43,41 0 16,91 7 76.49

8 97.

5 Dioxins/Furan

s 10-24-1

3 12:35-15:4

5 37

0 55.3

2 38.

3 12.3

7 5.7

4 41,59

8 16,28

4 112.80

3 100.

3

3 P M 10-25-1 3 09:35-10:4

0 37

2 57.3

5 38.

7 12.4

8 5.4

5 43,12

6 16,84

7 39.69 1 100. 3 3 HC1/C1 2 10-25-1 3 13:35-14:3

5 37

8 54.6

6 39.

3 12.0

0 5.9

6 41,10

2 15,79

6 37.03

4 99.8 3 Metal

s 10-25-1

3 13:35-16:1 1 37 3 57.9

4 39.

8 12.0

0 5.9

6 43,57

5 16,72

3 76.84

6 99. 1 3 Dioxins/Furan s 10-25-1

3 13:35-16:4

1 37

4 56.9

5 39.

3 12.0

0 5.9

6 42,82

9 16,55

0 115.28

4 100.

8 4 P M 10-25-1 3 10:50-11:5

5 37

4 54.5

2 39.

5 12.1 1 5.7

1 40,99

8 15,76

8 36.75

9 100.

5

3- 9

VES01737 63.1.3. 1 Sampl e Por t Locatio n The Uni t 2 an dUni t 3 stacks ar

e 90-feet hig h an dhav e a n insid e diamete

r o f 3 9 inches
. There ar e tw o set s o f tw o orthogona

l port s locate da

t tw o shghtly differen t

levels
. Onl y th

e uppe r se t o f orthogona

l ports ar e suitabl e for , an dwer

e use dfor , isokineti c sampling
. A n additiona l port locate dabou

t fou r fee t belo w th e uppe r orthogona

l ports , an dabou

t 45 ° betwee

n th e orthogona

l ports , wa

s use dfo r th e Modifie dMetho d26 A samplin g fo r HCI/CI2 . Th e numbe

r o f samplin g point s fo r

th e isokineti c samplin g b y Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A wa

s determine di n accordanc e wit h EP A Metho d1
. Th e Uni t 4 stac k i s lOO-fee

t hig h an dha

s a n insid e diamete

r o f 4 8 inches
. Ther

e ar e fou r orthogona

l ports locate da

t on e level
. A n additiona

l por t locate dabou

t fou r fee t belo w th e uppe r orthogona

l ports , an

dabou t 45 ° betwee

n th e orthogona

l ports , wa s usedfo r

th e Modifie dMetho d 26 A samplin g fo r

HCl/Cla
. The numbe

r o f sampling point s fo r

th e isokineti c samphng b y Metho d5 , Metho d29 , an dMetho d0023 A wa s determinedi n accordanc e wit h EP A Metho d1
. 3.1.3. 2 EP A Method s 2 an d 4 (Flowrate an d Moisture) Concurren

t wit h the performanc e o f

th e isokineti c samplin g trains , measurement s wer e mad e t o determin

e ga s velocity b y 4 0 CF RPar t 60 , Appendi x A , Metho d2 , an dmoistur e b y Metho d4
. Th e absence o f cycloni c flo w wa s determinedb y performin g acycloni c flo w check , prescribe di n EP A Metho d2 , prio r t o th e CP T testing o f

eac h incinerator
. 3.1.3. 3 EP A Metho d 5 (PM ) Sample s fo r

th e determinatio n o f

particulat

e matte r (PM ) i n stack

emission s wer

e collecte di n th

e firs t par t o f th e test s o f eac h incinerator

usin g EP A Metho d5
. Thi s sampl e trai n consiste do f

th e followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz ) nozzle ;
• Heated , glas s (quartz)-hnedprobe ;
• Heatedfilte r

with aTeflo n filte r

support ;
• Optiona

l empt y knockout

impinger ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Srnit h impinger

containin g 10

0 m L o f D I water ;
• Greenburg-Srnit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f D I water ;
• Empt y Modifie dGreenburg-Srnit h impinger ; an

d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Srnit h impinger

containin g silic agel
. Th e procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 protoco l wer e usedt o determine particulat

e matter . Thes e procedure s requir

e th e isokineti c extractio n o f

particulat e matte r o n afilte r

maintaine da

t a controlle dtemperatur

e betwee n 223° F an d273°F
. Th e particulat e mas s include s th

e mas s

3-1 0

VES01737 7determine dgravimetricall y i n th e probe an dnozzl e rins e (PNR ) with acetone , afte r evaporation an ddesiccation , an

dfilte r after desiccation
. 3.1.3. 4 Modifie d EP A Metho d 26 A (HCI/Cb ) Durin g th e secondpar

t o f th e test o f eac h incinerator , sample s fo r th e determinatio n o f HCI /CI 2 i n stac

k emission s wer

e collecte dusin g amodificatio n o f EP A Metho d26 A proposed an dapprove db y EP A Regio n 5
. Thi s sample trai n consiste do f th e followin g components :

• Glas s (quartz ) nozzle ;
• Heated , glas s (quartz)-line dprobe ;

. • HeatedTeflo n ma

t filte r with aTeflon ® filte r

support ;
• Teflon ® transfe

r line ;
• Optional empt

y knockout

impinger ;
• Greenburg-Smit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N H2SO4 ;
• Greenburg-Srnit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N H2SO4 ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger

containin g 10

0 m L o f 0. 1 N NaOH ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger

containin g 10

0 m L o f 0.1 N NaOH ; and

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger

containin g silic agel
. The procedure s specifie di n EP A Metho d5 , a s reference di n EP A Metho d26A , wer e usedfo r the isokineti c collectio n o f th e sample except

tha t th e sampl e wa s collecte da

t asingl e point locate da t the cente r o f th e stack
. A Teflon ® unio n wa s usedto connect the glas s o

r quart z nozzl e t o th e glas s or quart z prob e liner , an

dth e filte r an dprob e wer

e kep t a t atemperatur

e betwee n 248° F and273T
. A Teflon®-backe dfilte r was used , a

s specifie di n EP A Metho d26A
. 3.1.3. 5 EP A Metho d 29 (Metals ) Sample s o f

th e stac k ga s emission s wer

e collecte dfo r

th e detenninatio n o f

metal s durin g th e secon dpar

t o f the test o f eac h incinerator , Th e stac

k ga s sample s wer

e collecte d isokineticall y fo r

th e HW G MAC T metal s As , Be , Cd , Cr , Pb , andH g usin g Metho d29 fro m4 0 CF RPar t 60 , Appendi x A
. Thi s metho di s basicall y a n EP A Metho d5 samplin g trai n with som e ver y specifi c modifications :

• Glas s nozzle ;

• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;

• Heate dfilter ;

3-1 1

VES01737 8• Teflo n transfe r line ;

• Empty modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge r

containin g 10

0 m L o f 5 % HN0 3 an d10% H 2 0 2 ;

• Greenburg-Smit

h impinge

r containin g 10

0 m L o f 5 % HN0 3 and10% H 2 0 2 ;

• Empty modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinger ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge r

containin g 10

0 m L o f 4 % KMn0 4 and10 % H 2 S0 4 ;

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge r

containin g 10

0 m L o f 4 % KMn0

4 an d10 % H 2 S0 4 ;an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smith , impinge r containin g silic agel
. A Teflon ® transfer

lin e wa s usedbetwee

n th e filter an dth e first impinger
. Thi s i s don

e t o addres s space limitation s o n the stack, to allo w fo r eas e i n prob e moving , an dto minimiz e potentia l hazard s movin g the ver

y larg e an dheav y impinger

box
. Followin g samphng , th

e prob e an dnozzl e o f

th e samplin g trai n wer

e recovere dusin g a brus h containin g n o metal usin g 0. 1 normal nitri c acid
. 3.1.3. 6 SW-84 6 Metho d 0023A (Dioxins/Furans ) Stac k ga s emission s wer

e sample disokineticall y fo r dioxins/furan s i n th

e secon dpar t o f th e tes t o f eac h incinerato r

usin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023A
. Th e samplin g trai n consist s o f th e followin g components :

• Glas s nozzle ;
• Heated , glass-line dprobe ;
• Heate dfilter ;
• Heate dTeflon ® transfe r line ;
• Sorben

t module ;
• Knock-ou t

impinger ;
• Greenburg-Smit

h impinger

containin g 10

0 m L water ;
• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g 10 0 m L water ; an d

• Modifie dGreenburg-Smit h impinge

r containin g silic agel
. Fro mth e heated filter , sampl

e ga s wa s passe d throug

h aheate d Teflon ® transfe

r lin e befor

e enterin g th e sorben t module
. The sorben

t modul e consiste do f

awater-coole dcondense r anda
3-1 2

VES01737 9resi n tra p containin g XAD- 2 resin
. Th e condense r i s use dt o ensur e tha t th e ga s entering th

e resi n tra p i s belo w 68°F
. i Isotopically-labele ddioxins/furan s wer e spike dont

o th e XAD- 2 resi n bot

h befor e field samplin g (surrogat

e standards ) an

dint o appropriat

e place s i n th

e preparatio n prio r

t o analysi s afte r returnin g fro mth

e field
. 3.1.3. 7 Continuou s Emission s Monitorin g (THC , C0 2 , C O an d 0 2 ) CEM s wer

e usedt o monitor th e concentration s o f

total hydrocarbon s (THC) , carbo n dioxid e (CO2) , carbon monoxid e (CO) , an

doxyge n (O2) i n th

e stack gas . CO , correcte dto 7 % 0 2i s reporte d fo r th e stac k gase s fro mpermanen

t installatio n CEM S o n eac h o f th e thre e incinerators
. Th e concentration s o f THC , CO2 , andO

2 i n th e stac k ga s wer e determine dusin g EP A Method s 25 A an d3A , respectively
. CO 2 an d0 2wer e monitore dusin g Metho d3 A t

o detennin e th

e stac k ga s compositio n (i.e. , molecula r weight ) usedt o determin

e th e flowrat e o f

tli e stac k gas , an dt o correc t th e stac k samplin g result s to 7 % oxygen . Bot h o f thes e method s utiliz e continuou s monitors
. 3. 2 Analysi s Procedure s Sample s collecte ddurin g th e CP T wer

e analyze dfo r

th e parameter

s specifie di n Tabl e 3-6
. Al l analyse s wer e performe db y Tes t

Americ aLaboratorie s i n Knoxville , TN
. Analytica l result s fo r

th e wast e fee dsample s ar

e reporte d o n a

n as-received

o r wet weight basis
. Sample s o f

th e wast e fee dwer

e not drie dprio r

t o analysis
. Tabl e 3-6 . Summar y o f Analytica l Method s Paramete r Strea m Analytica l Metho d

Moistur e Stac k Ga s E P A Metho d 4

Metal s Wast e Feeds , Spikin g Solutions , Stac k Ga s ICPB S - SW-84 6 Metho d 6010 B CVAA S - Hg , SW-84 6 Metho d 7470 A or7471 A P M Stac k Ga s Gravimetri c - EP A Metho d 5 HCl/Cl 2 Stac k Ga s I C - EP A Metho d 26 A Dioxins/Furan s Stac k Ga s HRGC/M S - SW-84 6 Metho d 8290 A Composition/Physica l Parameter s Waste Feed s E P A and/o r AST M Standard Method s

3-1 3

VES01738 03.2. 1 Compositio n an d Physica l Parameters Analysi s Sample s o f

th e wast e feed s wil l b

e collecte dfo r

determinatio n o f

anumbe r o f chemica l andphysica l parameters . Sample s o f th e wast e feed s wer

e analyze dfo r

th e followin g parameters , hy th e reference d standar d methods :

• Ash-AST M Metho dAST M D-482 ;

• Tota l Chlorine-SW-84 6 Method s 505 0 an d9056A ;

• Moisture - AST M Metho dE-20 3 or D-4017(Karl-Fische r

titration ) fo r

hqui dwaste , an dAST M Metho dD-514 2 o r D-160. 3 (los s o n drying ) fo r soli dwaste ;

• Calorifi c Valu e - AST M Metho dD-586 5 or D-240 ;

• Density-AST M Metho dD-1475 ; an d

• Viscosity-AST M Metho dD-445
. 3.2. 2 Metal s Analysi s Wast e fee dsample s wer

e analyze dfo r

metal s usin g atrac e leve l inductivel y couple d argo n plasmaemissio n spectroscopy (ICPES ) an datomi c absorptio n spectroscopy . Sample s wer e prepare d fo r

analysi s usin g SW-84 6 Metho d3050B
. The metal s analyze db y ICPE S (SW-84 6 Metho d6010B ) ar

e arseni c (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , andlead(Pb)
. Mercury (Hg ) was analyze dusin g Metho d7471 A o f SW-846
. Spikin g solution s o f chromium an dmercur y wer e analyze dfo r

chromiumandmercury , respectively
. Th e Metho d2 9 samplin g trai n use d to collec t sample s o f

th e stack ga s fo r metal s wa

s analyze dusin g ICPE S accordin g t o SW-84 6 Metho d6010 B fo r arseni c (As) , berylliu m(Be) , cadmiu m(Cd) , chromiu m(Cr) , an dlea d(Pb) , an dmercur y was analyze dusin g Metho d7470 A o f SW-846
. 3.2. 3 P M Analysi s The P M concentratio n o f th e stac k ga s was determined followin g 4 0 CF R60 , Appendi x A , Metho d5 protocols
. Th e was h fro mth e nozzle , prob e liner , an

dglasswar

e prio r t o th e filte r Q?NR ) o f th e samplin g trai n wa

s evaporated , andth e mas s determine d o n a n analytical balance
. Th e filte r recovere dfro mth

e sampling trai n was desiccated , an dweighe dt

o determin

e th e mas s of particulat

e o n the fdter
. Th e combinedmas s fro mth e filte r an dth e evaporated wash ar

e used with th e total volume o f

ga s sampledt

o determine th

e particulat

e loading
. 3.2. 4 HCI/CI a Analysi s Th e sulfuri c aci dan

dsodiumhydroxid e impinge r catche s an

drinse s fro mth

e Modifie d Metho d26 A samphng train s wer e analyze dfo r

chlorid e io n concentration s usin g th e analytica

l

3-1 4

VES01738 1approac h specifie di n Metho d26A
. Th e Modifie dMetho d26 A samplin g trai n wa s recoveredt

o provid e arins e o f

th e transfe r lin e an dcontent s an drinse s o f

th e acidi c impinger s (an

dknockou

t impinger ) fo r

determination o f

hydroge n chloride ; andth

e content s an drinse s o f

th e alkalin e impinger s fo r

determination o f

chlorine
. Bot

h wer e analyze dfo r

chlorid e b y io n chromatograph y (IC ) fo r determination o f

chloride
. The chloride foun di n th e aci dimpinger s (an

drinses ) i s reporte da

s HCI , an dth e chlorid e determine

di n the alkalin e impinger s (andrinses ) i s reporteda s CI2 . Sodiu mthiosulfat

e wa s adde dt o th e collecte dalkalin e impinger sample s i n th

e analytica

l laborator y befor e analysis
. 3.2. 5 Dioxins/Furan s Analysi s Sample s o f

th e stac k ga s wer e collecte dusin g SW-84 6 Metho d0023A , an dwer e analyze dfo r

dioxins/furan s usin g SW-84 6 Metho d8290A , hig h resolutio n ga s chromatograph

y (HRGC ) wit

h hig h resolutio n mas s spectroscop y (HRMS ) analytical technique
. Th e analytica l protoco l include s quantitatio n o f al l dibenzodioxin s anddibenzofuran s includin g fou r or mor e chlorin e atoms . The metho dprovide s congene r clas s definitio n fo r

eac h o f th e fiv e congene

r group s (tetra- , penta- , hexa- , hepta- , an docta-)
. In addition , eac

h individua l isome

r containin g the 2,3,7,8-substitutio n patter n wa s individuall y quantified , Dioxins/furan s concentration s ar e reporte dfor :

• Combinatio n o f

th e filte r an dal l th e rinse s between th

e nozzl e andfilter ; an

d

• Combinatio n of

th e sorben t an dal l th e rinse s betwee

n th e filte r an dsorbent
. 3. 3 Proces s Monitorin g Procedure s Th e incinerator

systems ar

e monitore dt

o ensur e operatio n i s i n accordanc e wit h th e permitte dconditions
. Durin g the performanc e test, th e automatic wast

e fee dcutof

f system s wer e operational ; however , AWFC O hinit s i n th e curren t NO C wer

e adjuste do r

disable ddurin g th

e performanc e testing period s t o allo w targe t operation s to be achieved
. Th e CP T Pla n prescribe da Continuou s Monitorin g Syste mPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t fo r eac h o f th e thre e incinerators
. Th e Continuou s Monitorin g SystemPerformanc e Evaluatio n Tes t Report s (CMSPETR ) fo r th e thre e incinerator s ar

e include da

s Appendi x D
. Th e ra

w proces s monitorin g dat afro mth e CP T testin g o f eac h o f th e three incinerator s ar

e presente

d i n Appendi x C
.

3-1 5

VES01738 2

### 4. 0 Result s Thi s sectio n present

s th e results o f

th e comprehensiv e performanc e tes t o f Veoha' s incinerator s a

t Sauget
. Th e analytical result s fo r th e wast e fee dstreams andstac

k ga s ar e presente d i n Section s 4. 1 an d4.2
. Th e collectio n o f

sample s an

dth e method s usedfo r

sampling an danalysi s ar

e specifie di n th

e CP T Plan andQAPjP
. Not e tha t value s presented i n these table s (andthroughou t th e report ) ar e roundedt

o display a n appropriat

e leve l o f significance
. Al l calculation s ar e done with unroundedvalues , an dtherefore , i t

ma y not b e possibl e t

o reproduc e acalculate dvalu e exactl y fro mth e dat ashow n i n atable
. It

ma y b e necessar

y to g o t o earlie r tables , or

th e ra w dat ai n th e appendices , t

o reproduc e acalculate dvalu e exactly
. 4. 1 Wast e Feedstream s Fou r wast e stream s wer e sample dan danalyze di n bot

h th e firs t par t an dth e secon dpar t o f eac h ru n o f th e CP T test

s o f Unit s 2 and3 , thre

e liqui dwast

e streams an don

e soli dwast

e stream . Al l ar

e fe dt o th e primar y combustion chambe

r (PCC)
. Th e streams sampledan d analyze dare :

• Low-Bt u Liqui dWaste ;
• Hig h Bt u Liqui dWaste ;
• Liqui d(Specialty ) Waste ; and

• Containerize dSoli dWaste
. Fiv e wast e stream s wer e sample dandanalyze di n bot

h th e firs t par t an dth e secon dpar t o f each ru n o f

th e CP T tes t

o f Uni t 4 , thre e hqui dwast

e streams andtw o soli dwast e stream s . includin g tw o liqui dwaste s an dtw o sohdwaste s tha

t wer e fe dt o th e kil n (i.e. , th

e primar y combustio n chambe

r - PCC) , andon

e liqui dwast

e tha t wa s fe dt o th e secondar

y combustion chambe r (SCC)
. The stream

s sampledan

danalyze dare :

• Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kiln ;
• Hig h Bt u Liqui dWast e t o Kiln ;
• Containerize dSoli dWaste ;
• Bul k Soh dWaste ; an

d

• Liqui dWast

e t o th e SCC
. Composite sample s wer

e preparedo f

th e sample s collecte ddurin g each o f th e Metho d5 samplin g tim

e i n th e firs t par t o f eac h test , an dth e Modifie dMetho d26A , Metho d29 , an d

4- 1

VES01738 3Metho d0023 A samphng time s o f th e secon dpar t o f eac h test . Al l o f

th e composit

e liqui d wast e fee dsample s fro mfh e firs t par t andth e secon dpar

t o f th e CP T tests wer

e analyzedfo r ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content, moisture , density , an dviscosity
. Al l o f

th e composit

e soli d wast e fee dsample s fro mth

e firs t par t andth e secondpar

t o f th e CP T test

s wer e analyzedfo r ash , tota l chlorine , hea

t content, an

dmoisture
. Th e composit e hqui dan

dsoli dwast

e fee d sample s collecte ddurin g th e Metho d2

9 stac k samphn g wer e als o analyze dfo r

metal s (arsenic , beryllium , chromium , cadmium , lead , an dmercury)
. Eac h sampl e wa s give n aunique lo g numbe r tha t identifie s th

e projec t an dunit , ru n number , anda

n identificatio n cod

e base dupo n th e sample typ e an dfraction
. A n example o f th e lo g numbe

r forma t follows : Proj-XY-AB C Where : Pro

j i s aprojec t

specifi c identification ; X Y represen

t th e conditio n an

dru n number ; and A B C i s a n alphanumeri c sequence describin g the particula r sample
. Her e i s adescriptio n o f

th e sampl e code s usedfo r

th e wast e sample s i n th

e CPT
. VS 2 (Veoh aSauge

t an duni t numbe r 2 , 3 , o r 4 ) - Strea

mCod e - Tes t Condition/Ru n Number/Par t A o r B - Sampl e Descriptio n Strea mCodes : LW F= Liqui dWast

e Fee d(t o SC C Uni t

4) HB W = High-Btu Liqui dWast e (t o Kil n Uni t

4 ) LB W = Low-Bt u Liqui dWast e (t o Kil n Unit

4 ) C S = Containerize dSohd s (sohd s materia l sample dfro mth

e bo x containers ) B S Bul k

Solid s (Uni t

4 only ) C L = Chlorin e Spikin g Materia l (sample s o f th e chlorin e spikin g materia l fro mth e bo x containers ) P B LeadSpikin g Materia l (sample s o f th e leadsalt s containe di n th e box containers ) H G = Mercur

y Spikin g Materia l (sample s o f th e vial s containin g th

e mercur y spikin g solutio n i n th e box containers ) C R= Chromiu mSpikin g Solutio n

4- 2

VES01738 4Tes tCondition/Ru

n Number/Par

tA or B : Tes t Conditio n i s "1 " fo r

al l sample s an

dal l runs . Ru n Numbers typicall y ar e 1,2, & 3 , howeve

r additional run s performe dt o replac e aborte d and/o r repeated run s continu e i n sequence , 4 , 5 , etc . Par t A refer s t

o th e tes t segmen t associate dwit h th

e P M emission s testin g (i.e. , th e firs t par t o f th e test)
. Par t B refer s t

o th e tes t segmen t associate dwith th

e HCI/CI2 , Metals , an d Dioxins/Furan s emission s testin g (i.e. , th e secondpar

t o f th e test)
. Sampl e Description : Wast e an dspikin g material sample s include dindividua l gra b sample s fo r archiving , an

dcomposit

e sample s specifi c to eac h emission s tes t period
. Thes e ar e labele da

s follows : Individual gra

b sample s ar

e labele dwith th

e suffi x as : -Gra b 1 , -Gra b 2 , -Gra b 3 , etc . i n sequentia

l order
. Composit e sample s wer

e collecte ddurin g each emission s samphng perio dan dar e represente

d by th e followin g I D suffix : COMP 1 = Composite sampl e collecte ddurin g th e P M emission s tes

t perio d COMP2 A = Composite sampl e collecte ddurin g th e HCI/CI 2 emission s test perio d COMP2 B = Composite sampl e collecte ddurin g th e Metal s emission s test perio d COMP2 C = Composite sampl e collecte ddurin g th e dioxins/furan s emission s test

perio d Note tha t ther e shoul dno t

b e an y COMP2A , B , o

r C sample s labele dwith a"

- xxA- " ru n number, no r

shoul dther

e be any COMP 1 sample s with a"-xxB- " ru n number
. Examples : VS2-HBW-15B-Gra b 4 i s th e 4 t hgra b sampl e o f

High-Bt u liqui dwast

e collecte d fo r archiv e durin g Ru n 5-Par t B o n Uni t 2
. VS3-LWF-12A-COMP 1 i s the composit e sample o f

th e hqui dwast

e fee d collecte dfo r

analysi s durin g P M emission s Ru n 2 tes t perio d(Par

t A ) o n Unit 3
. Tabl e 4- 1 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit

y i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWaste fe dto Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4- 2 present

s fh e analytical result s fo r chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an dviscosit

y i n th e High-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 2
.

4- 3

VES01738 5Tabl e 4- 3 present s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , rnetals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosit y i n th e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4-4 presents th

e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, an

d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoh dWast e fe dt o Uni t 2
. Tabl e 4- 5 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content, moisture , density , an

d viscosity i n th

e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 6 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an d viscosit

y i n th e High-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 7 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , an

d viscosity i n th

e Specialt y Liqui dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 8 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , and moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoli dWast e fe dt o Uni t 3
. Tabl e 4- 9 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , and viscosity i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui dWast

e fe dt o th e kil n (PCC ) o f

Unit 4
. Tabl e 4-1 0 presents th

e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , and viscosit

y i n th e High-Btu Liqui dWast

e fe dt o the kil n (PCC ) o f

Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 1 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , moisture , density , and viscosit

y i n th e Liqui dWast

e fe dt o th e SC C o f Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 2 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an

d moistur e i n th e Containerize dSoh dWast e fe dt o Uni t 4
. Tabl e 4-1 3 present

s th e analytical result s fo r

chlorine , ash , metals , hea t content , an

d moistur e i n th e Bul k Soli dWast

e fe dt o Uni t 4
. Th e detaile d analytica

l reports ar

e presented i n Appendi x Gl
.

4- 4

VES01738 6Tabl e 4-1 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s - 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HCI/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorine mg/k g 34 5 34 0 34 7 36 3 34 6 37 4 40 4 36 4 39 3 34 0 35 7 37 2 As h mg/k

g 3,14 0 2,94 0 2,97 0 2,99 0 2,96 0 3,25 0 3,86 0 3,18 0 3,13 0 3,13 0 3,10 0 2,94 0 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A 2. 7 N A N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 2. 1 N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.097 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 7. 2 N A N A N A N A 9. 0 N A N A 7. 0 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0. 8 N A N A N A N A 0.8 8 N A N A 0.74 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 1.1 N A N A N A N A 1. 7 N A N A 1. 1 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A N A N A 0.042 N A N A 0.05 2 N A Percen tWate r % 98. 1 98. 0 98. 2 98. 3 97. 9 98. 4 97. 5 96. 6 98. 2 99. 9 99. 0 99. 2 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b <130 <130 <130 <13 0 <13 0 <130 <13 0 <13 0 <130 <13 0 17 8 <13 0 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99 9 1.00

0 1.00

0 Viscosit y cSt 0.93 4 0.93 9 0.93 0 0.93 4 0.93 0 0.93 0 0.93 2 0.93 2 0.93 3 0.92 8 0.92 9 0.92 7

4- 5

VES01738 7tabl e 4-2 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Parameter Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Parameter Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 1 P M 2A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k

g 7,07 0 6,96

0 7,14

0 7,24

0 7,18

0 3,78 0 3,26

0 3,210 3,33

0 3,50

0 3,58

0 3,450 . As h mg/k

g 1,35 0 1,03

0 1,10

0 1,04

0 1,01

0 1,18 0 55 7 58

2 551 2,08 0 1,21

0 1,35

0 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A 8. 3 N A N A N A N A 2. 8 N A N A <0.3 2 N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 8 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 1, 0 N A N A N A N A 0.6 7 N A N A 6. 7 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.02 6 N A N A N A N A 0.02 1 N A N A 0.09 6 N A Percen tWate r % 22. 1 21.9 22. 1 21.9 21. 8 20.6 20.

0 20.

2 20.

3 27.6 28. 1 27. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/lb 9,09 0 9,00

0 9,04

0 9,05

0 9,04

0 9,12 0 9,16

0 9,13

0 9,15

0 8,63

0 8,63

0 8,66

0 Densit y g/m 3 O.88 0 0.87

9 0.88

0 0.87

8 0.87

9 0.87 5 0.86

8 0.86

9 0.86

9 0.88

3 0.88

3 0.88

3 Viscosit y cSt 1.3 1 1.3

0 1.2

9 1.2

9 1.2

8 1.1 9 1.1

8 1.1

8 1.1

7 1.6

0 1.6

2 1.6

0Tabl e 4-3 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metals 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 1 P M 2A HCyci 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorine mg/k g 91.8 10

5 15

9 15

6 14

0 11 1 13

0 12

4 13

0 10

6 92.4 10

8 As h mg/k

g 64 9 60

0 57

5 1,01

0 59

9 59 8 65

7 59

2 57

9 90

4 83

2 83

2 Arseni c mg/k g N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.31 N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A N A . <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A N A N A <0. 2 NA . N A <0. 2 N A Lead mg/k

g N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 6 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A <0.00 9 N A N A N A N A <0.008 6 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen tWate r % 98. 1 98. 2 98.

2 99.

0 98.

8 98. 4 98.

5 98.

7 98.

3 101.

0 101.

0 100.

0 Heatin g Value Btu/l

b <13 0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13 0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 0.99

8 0.99

9 1.00

0 0.99

7 0.99 8 0.99

7 0.99

7 0.99

7 0.99

7 0.99

8 0.99

8 Viscosit y cSt 0.89 7 0.89

4 0.89

4 0.89

6 0.89

7 0.90 0 0.89

5 0.89

7 0.89

7 0.90

6 0.90

7 0.9

1

4- 7

VES01738 9Tabl e 4-4 . Uni t 2 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Wast e Fee d
Analytical Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 5 Analytical Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 1

P M 2A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC!/Cl 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorine mg/k g 28 8 18

4 16

7 23

7 28

4 43

3 34

5 49

9 26

7 34

6 39

6 351 As h mg/k

g 675,00

0 785,00

0 708,00

0 676,00

0 688,00

0 655,00

0 657,00

0 634,00

0 637,00

0 732,00

0 688,00

0 703,00

0 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A 8. 8 N A N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A 8. 8 N A Beryllium mg/k g • N A N A 0.4 8 N A N A N A N A 0.6 1 N A N A 0.7 3 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A 0.08 4 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 12. 8 N A N A N A N A 19. 3 N A N A 16. 7 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 11. 6 N A N A N A N A 11. 7 N A N A 13. 5 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.04 5 N A N A N A N A 0.02 2 N A N A 0.01 6 N A Percen tWate r % 20.

2 23.

4 21.

7 24.

5 26.2 24.

9 25.

2 25. 1 25. 1 22.6 25. 4 20.

8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS

t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A

4- 8

VES01739 0Tabl e 4-5 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , IMetals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k

g 40 9 44

0 56

3 41 9 40

8 42

7 409 42

9 40

0 38

8 40

8 42

4 As h mg/k

g 3,09 0 4,07 0 4,86

0 3,70

0 3,28

0 3,65

0 3,20

0 3,20

0 3,00

0 2,94

0 3,46

0 3,10

0 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A N A 4. 8 N A N A N A 3. 2 N A N A 3. 3 N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A 15. 2 N A N A - N A 9. 4 N A N A 11. 3 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A 1. 3 N A N A N A 0.8 7 N A N A 0.9 7 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A N A . 3. 1 N A N A N A 1. 9 N A N A 1

- 9 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A N A 0.06 5 N A N A N A 0.04 9 N A N A 0.0 8 N A Percen tWate r % 101.

0 99. 8 99.

3 99.

8 100.

0 98.

2 99.

3 100.

0 99.

2 99.

7 99.

5 99.9 Heatin g Value Btu/l

b <13 0 17 3 361 25

6 15

8 46

2 20

9 18

1 21 3 15

4 <13

0 13

2 Densit y g/m 3 1.00 0 1.00 0 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99

9 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.01

0 1.00

0 Viscosit y cSt 0.93 2 0.93 1 0.93

3 0.93

2 0.93

5 0.93

5 0.94

0 0.93

3 0.93

7 0.93

5 0.93

2 0.93

4

4- 9

VES01739 1Tabl e 4-6 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s I n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Parameter Units Run l Run 2 Ru n 3 Ri m 4 Analytica l Parameter Units 1 P M 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k

g 3,45 0 2,41 0 2,46

0 2,72

0 2,43

0 1,73

0 1,69

0 1,65

0 1,62

0 1,91 0 1,810 1,83 0 Ash mg/k

g 1,26 0 93 7 1,10

0 1,16

0 73

0 59

9 47

8 58

6 64

8 73

4 69

3 73

0 Arseni c mg/k

g N A N A N A 12. 4 N A N A N A 1. 7 N A "N

A 2.

4 N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.09 5 N A N A N A <0. 1 N A N A <0.09 6 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.07 5 N A N A N A <0.07 9 N A N A <0.07 6 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A . <0.2 1 N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A <0.2 1 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A N A 1. 8 N A N A N A 1. 0 N A N A 1. 3 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A N A 0.02 7 N A N A N A 0.02 9 N A N A 0.02 2 N A Percen tWate r % 24.

0 23.9 23.9 24. 1 24. 0 23.

3 23.0 23.

0 23. 1 25.

2 25.

2 25.

4 Heatin g Valu e Btu/lb 8,68 0 8,82 0 8,70

0 8,70

0 8,80

0 8,84

0 8,87

0 8,79

0 8,86

0 8,55

0 8,62

0 8,56

0 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 9 0.87 8 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

8 0.87

4 0.87

4 0.87

3 0.87

4 0.87

9 0.87

9 0.88

0 Viscosit y cS t 1.3 3 1.3 0 13 0 1.3

1 1.3

0 1.2

8 1.2

6 1.2

7 1.2

6 1.3

5 1.3

5 1.3

6

4-1 0Tabl e 4-7 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Specialt y Liqui d Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Ru n 1 Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 1 P M 2A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorine mg/k g 18 8 17 4 1,48

0 69

6 58

7 11 1 10

1 12

5 11

2 11

3 12

7 9

2 As h mg/k

g 59 1 62

2 917 71 3 73 3 58

8 52

0 52

0 52 1 64

8 62

0 60

6 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A <0.3 3 N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A <0.09 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 6 N A N A <0.07 8 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.21 N A N A <0.2 2 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A <0.2 8 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.008 8 N A N A N A <0.009 4 N A N A <0.009 9 N A Percen tWate r % 98.4 97. 7 97.

3 98.

7 95.8 97.

9 97.

2 98.

4 96.

2 97. 1 99.

2 97. 1 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b <13 0 <13 0 <13

0 • <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 8 1.00 0 1.00

0 0.99

9 1.00

0 0.99

9 0.99

7 0.99

7 0.99

8 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 Viscosit y cS t 0.90 1 0.90 4 0.89

8 0.90

3 0.89

7 0.89

7 0.89

9 0.90 1 0.89

9 0.89

8 0.89

8 0.89

7

4-1 1Tabl e 4-8 . Uni t 3 - Analytica l Result s fo r Tota l Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Waste Fee d Analytica l Paramete r Units Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Units 1 P M 1

P M 2

A HCVCf c 2 B . Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A

HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HCI/CI j 2 B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s Chlorin e mg/k

g 25 3 22

9 48

2 19

5 12

9 34

7 11

5 271 20 4 38

2 25

5 29

7 As h mg/k

g 670,00

0 682,00

0 663,00

0 775,00

0 737,00

0 778,00

0 655,00

0 715,00

0 682,00

0 721,00

0 686,00

0 698,00

0 Arsenic mg/k

g N A N A N A 7. 5 N A N A N A 6. 4 N A N A 8. 4 N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A N A 0.5 8 N A N A N A 0.5 5 N A N A 0.7 9 N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A <0.07 1 N A N A N A <0.07 6 . N A N A <0.07 1 N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A N A 13.6 . N A N A N A 13. 7 N A N A 18. 9 N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A N A 11.1 N A N A N A 10. 7 N A N A 14. 1 N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A N A 0.02 8 N A N A 0.02 6 N A Percen t Wate r % 18.

2 15.

8 22.

5 27.

4 22.0 28. 7 20.

8 25.

0 19.

0 27.

5 24.

8 22.6 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A

4-1 2

VES01739 4Tabl e 4-9 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Low-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d t o th e Kil n Analytica l Paramete

r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete

r Unit s 1 P M 2A HC1/CI 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC]/Ci 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k

g 47 2 416 413 44 9 46

7 39

3 42

2 53

7 48

6 53

2 43

9 53

0 As h mg/k

g 2,79 0 2,91

0 3,10

0 2,57

0 3,06

0 3,26

0 2,94

0 3,32

0 3,22

0 2,63

0 3,26

0 3,25

0 Arseni c mg/k

g N A N A 5.5 . N A N A 4.9 N A N A N A 2. 9 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.09 4 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 13. 6 N A N A 12.1 N A N A N A 9. 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 1. 3 N A N A 1. 2 N A N A N A 0.8 4 N A N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 3. 3 N A N A 2. 9 N A N A N A 1. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A 0.1 4 N A N A N A 0.1 1 N A N A Percen tWate r % 98.

8 97.

3 97.

7 97.

0 96.

5 95.

8 97.

3 97. 1 98. 1 98.6 96.9 98. 8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/lb <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 15

7 16

6 <13

0 19 7 <13

0 28

3 40

2 Densit y g/m 3 0.99 9 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99

9 0.99

9 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 1.00

0 0.99

9 . 1.00

0 0.99

9 Viscosit y cSt 0.93 4 0.93

9 0.92

9 0.93

3 0.92

8 0.93

3 0.92

9 0.93

2 0.93

0 0.93

2 0.93

2 0.93

2

4-1 3Tabl e 4-10 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e High-Bt u Liqui d Wast e Fee d t o th e Kil n
Analytica l Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Paramete r Unit s 1 P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HCl/Cl j 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A 

### ncvch 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k

g 1,47 0 1,45

0 1,49

0 1,42

0 1,39

0 1,36

0 1,36

0 1,35

0 1,36

0 1,35

0 1,35

0 1,33

0 As h mg/k

g 1,61 0 2,35

0 2.110 1,82

0 89

8 1,01

0 1,02

0 1,50

0 97

3 93 1 1,02 0 98

9 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A 1. 4 N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A <0.09 9 N A N A <0.09 3 N A N A N A <0.09 7 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.12 N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.2 4 N A N A <0. 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 1- 1 N A N A 0. 4 N A N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.04 8 N A N A 0.021 N A N A N A 0.01 8 N A N A Percen tWate r % 24.0 24. 3 24.

0 23.

8 25.

0 24.9 24.

5 25.

2 24.

8 25. 1 24.

7 24.

8 Heatin g Valu e Btu/lb 8,74

0 8,70

0 8,69

0 8,75

0 8,78

0 8,76

0 8,73

0 8,76

0 8,79

0 8,75

0 8,78

0 8,810 Densit y g/m 3 0.87 6 0.87

7 0.87

6 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

7 0.87

8 0.87

7 0.87

7 Viscosit y cS t 1.2 9 1.2

8 1.2

8 1.2

9 1.3

7 1.37

. 1.3

7 1.3

8 1.3

6 1.3

7 1.3

6 1.3

6

4-1 4Tabl e 4-11 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Liqui d Wast e Fee d t o th e SC C
Analytical Paramete r Unit s Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytical Paramete r Unit s I P M 2A HCl/Cl j 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorine mg/k g 1,25 0 1,23

0 1,25

0 1,21

0 1,26

0 2,50

0 1,24

0 1,27

0 1,28

0 1,25

0 1,28

0 1,32

0 As h mg/k

g 74 4 51 1 48

5 . 47

8 69

4 67

3 67

2 78

7 651 60

4 59 1 74

3 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A <0. 3 N A N A <0.3 2 N A N A N A <0.3 1 N A N A Berylliu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.09 2 N A N A <0.09 8 N A N A N A <0.09 4 N A • N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A <0.07 3 N A N A <0.07 7 N A N A N A <0.07 4 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A <0. 2 N A N A <0.2 2 N A N A N A <0.2 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A <0.2 7 N A N A N A <0.2 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A 0.01 9 N A N A N A 0.01 7 N A N A Percen tWate r % 27.

0 26.

5 26.

5 26.

2 26.9 26.

7 27.

0 26.

8 26.6 25.6 26.6 26.9 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b 8,83 0 8,810 8,79

0 8,810 8,76

0 8,80

0 8,76

0 8,78

0 8,86

0 8,86

0 8,87

0 8,83

0 Densit y g W 0.87 9 0.87

8 0.87

8 0.87

8 0.87

9 0.87

8 0.87

7 0.87

9 0.87

7 0.87

8 0.87

8 0.87

8 Viscosit y cS t 1.5 4 1.5

2 1.5

2 1.5

2 1.5

3 1.5

2 1.5

2 1.52

j 1.5 2 1.5

2 1.5

1 1.5

2

4-1 5Tabl e 4-12 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Containerize d Solid s Wast e Fee d
Analytical Paramete r Units Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytical Paramete r Units 1 P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2A

HC1/CI 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k

g 17 6 19

2 19

0 16

7 20

5 201 25

7 22

7 20

7 18

0 271 24

4 As h mg/k

g 758,00

0 828,00

0 739,00

0 728,00

0 728,00

0 731,00

0 745,00

0 724,00

0 749,00

0 730,00

0 719,00

0 771,00

0 Arseni c mg/k

g N A N A 2. 4 N A N A 2. 0 N A N A N A 2. 1 N A N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A 0.1 3 N A N A 0.1 6 N A N A - N A <0. 1 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.4 6 N A N A 0.4 3 N A N A N A 0.4 5 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 45. 2 N A N A 58.9 N A N A N A 35. 1 N A N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 35. 9 N A . N A 21 2 N A N A N A 25. 4 N A N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.1 8 N A • N A 0.2 4 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Percen tWate r %
. 7.6

4 8.10 6.7

5 9.1 0 7.9

3 8.2

9 7.8

2 9.8

8 8.1 1 7.9

4 9.31 6.3 1 Heatin g Value Btu/lb <13 0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A . N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A

4-1 6Tabl e 4-13 . Uni t 4 - Analytica l Result s fo r Chlorine , Ash , Metals , an d Physica l Parameter s i n th e Bul k Solid s Wast e Fee d
Analytica l Parameter Units Run l Ru n 2 Ru n 3 Ru n 4 Analytica l Parameter Units 1 P M 2

A HCI/C1 2 2

B Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 2 A

HC1/C1 2 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M 2 A HCl/Cl j 2 B

Metal s 2 C

Dioxins / Furan s 1

P M Chlorin e mg/k

g 17 1 18

4 21 9 26

5 25

7 24

3 23

6 19

3 19

1 17

3 18

2 16

4 As h mg/k

g 695,00

0 646,00

0 715,00

0 784,00

0 770,00

0 720,00

0 674,00

0 689,00

0 729,00

0 737,00

0 695,00

0 710,00

0 Arsenic mg/k g N A N A 2. 2 N A N A 3. 0 N A N A N A 2. 2 N A N A Beryllium mg/k g N A N A 0.21 N A N A 0.2 8 N A N A N A 0.2 6 N A N A Cadmiu m mg/k

g N A N A 0.2 8 ' N A N A 0.3 7 N A N A N A 0.3 0 N A N A Chromiu m mg/k

g N A N A 35.6 N A N A 37. 9 N A N A N A 29.8 N A N A Lea d mg/k

g N A N A 41. 0 N A N A 58. 1 N A N A N A 26. 6 N A N A Mercur y mg/k

g N A N A 0.08 2 N A N A 0.12 N A N A N A 0.07 7 N A N A Percen tWate r . • % 14.

2 18.

8 10.

3 11.

6 16.

6 19.

2 19.

9 13.

3 19.

3 17.

3 15.

6 24.

7 Heatin g Valu e Btu/l

b <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 <13

0 Densit y g/m 3 N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A Viscosit y cS t N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N A

4-1 7