alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 99 (Friday, May 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13743]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #3076]


State of Alabama; Amendment #2

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency dated April 29, 1998, the above-numbered Declaration is hereby 
amended to include Walker County in the State of Alabama as a disaster 
area due to damages caused by severe storms and tornadoes beginning on 
April 8, 1998 and continuing through April 20, 1998.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous county of Marion, Alabama may be 
filed until the specified date at the previously designated location. 
Any counties contiguous to the above-name primary county and not listed 
herein have been previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for physical damage is June 8, 1998 and for 
economic injury the termination date is January 11, 1999.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: May 8, 1998.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-13743 Filed 5-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
(32.2)





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











The
undersigned officer hereby certifies as to the Report on Form 10-Q of Met-Pro
Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2009, that (i) the report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Met-Pro Corporation.











Dated:  December
      4, 2009
            
            /s/
      Gary J. MorganGary
      J. MorganSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

OLEG FINEFTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 28, 2020

v No. 348151 Oakland Circuit Court JANE DOE and FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, LC No. 2018

- 166477

- NI

Defendant s

- Appell ee s

.

Before: B ECKERING , P.J., AND F ORT H OOD AND S HAPIRO , JJ.

S HAPIRO , J. ( concurring ).

I concur with the majority opinion in all respects. However, I believe the majority fails to adequately address the conduct of defense counsel in this case. According to the e

- mails provided to the court, defense counsel, whether by action and/or omission, deceived plaintiff’s counsel. On December 28, 2018, plaintiff’s counsel wrote defense coun sel as follows: “Please advise if you are going to dismiss the MSD that is currently pending.” Defense counsel unambiguously responded, “We are withdrawing the pending MSD.” However, the defense did not withdraw the motion nor promptly advise plaintiff t hat it would not do what it said it would. Instead, without informing plaintiff, the defense allowed the motion to remain on the court’s calendar all the while knowing that if plaintiff did not respond to the still

- pending motion by January 30, 2019

, the court would “assume that [plaintiff’s] counsel does not have any authority for its respective position, and a written opinion will be issued on or before the scheduled hearing date.” After several weeks, defense counsel sent an e

- mail to plaintiff’s couns el stating that he was proceeding with the motion for summary disposition

, and plaintiff’s counsel, relying on the fact that the original motion for summary disposition had been withdrawn, concluded that that defendant had, or would, refile the motion and obtain a new hearing date. Plaintiff’s counsel e

- mailed in response: “Once you get a hearing date, please send me the notice.” Defense counsel never responded to this e

- mail nor advise d plaintiff’s counsel in some other fashion that the initial motion ha d n ot been withdrawn and would be heard as originally scheduled. If this conduct was intentional it is sanctionable.- 2

-

Accordingly, on remand, I would further direct the court to determine whether defense counsel’s failure to withdraw the motion or his failure to fully inform plaintiff’s counsel that the original hearing date was still scheduled was intentional and

, if so

, determine whether defendant and its counsel should be sanctioned for such conduct.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
No. 12M88.

#### Polypore International, Inc. *v.*Federal Trade Commission.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari with appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record granted.
No. 12-8140.

#### Bernadel *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# L_2014218DE.01000802.xml

| 24.7.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 218/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 218/8

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2010/73/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 24. November 2010 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2003/71/EG betreffend den Prospekt, der beim öffentlichen Angebot von Wertpapieren oder bei deren Zulassung zum Handel zu veröffentlichen ist, und der Richtlinie 2004/109/EG zur Harmonisierung der Transparenzanforderungen in Bezug auf Informationen über Emittenten, deren Wertpapiere zum Handel auf einem geregelten Markt zugelassen sind

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 327 vom 11. Dezember 2010
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 327 vom 11. Dezember 2010

Seite 9, Artikel 1 Nummer 14 Buchstabe a Ziffer ii:

anstatt:

| „ii) | erhält Unterabsatz 2 folgende Fassung:
  ‚Die Mitgliedstaaten können verlangen, dass Emittenten oder die für die Erstellung eines Prospekts verantwortlichen Personen, die ihren Prospekt nach Buchstaben a oder b veröffentlichen, ihn auch in einer elektronischen Form nach Buchstabe c veröffentlichen.‘“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

erhält Unterabsatz 2 folgende Fassung:

‚Die Mitgliedstaaten können verlangen, dass Emittenten oder die für die Erstellung eines Prospekts verantwortlichen Personen, die ihren Prospekt nach Buchstaben a oder b veröffentlichen, ihn auch in einer elektronischen Form nach Buchstabe c veröffentlichen.‘“

muss es heißen:

| „ii) | erhält Unterabsatz 2 folgende Fassung:
  ‚Die Mitgliedstaaten verpflichten Emittenten oder die für die Erstellung eines Prospekts verantwortlichen Personen, die ihren Prospekt nach Buchstabe a oder b veröffentlichen, ihn auch in einer elektronischen Form nach Buchstabe c veröffentlichen.‘“ |
| --- | --- |

„ii)

erhält Unterabsatz 2 folgende Fassung:

‚Die Mitgliedstaaten verpflichten Emittenten oder die für die Erstellung eines Prospekts verantwortlichen Personen, die ihren Prospekt nach Buchstabe a oder b veröffentlichen, ihn auch in einer elektronischen Form nach Buchstabe c veröffentlichen.‘“

---
CAPITOL SERVICES, INC 

llii \V Ml, In; II! Avf , Sic 700, Lansing, Ml 48').i3 

S17j;72.08C-)0 l-ax 517.372.072.^ 

wvvw.capitolsei-N'icfs.org 

CTo 

' O 

L A J 

V 

',.i. 'JT'-, - ' 

r'•\'"'~-'—'' 

^Oi;v;:f:"-; 

''•i-*',rr | 

TXj "-..J ".-•* 

r^S^z^—* 

0'rrTJi:=: 

February 10,2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 5 co 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Sun Country slot exemption Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

To U.S. Department of Transportation Officials: 

On behalf of Sim Country Airlines' non-stop Lansing-to-Washington, D.C. route, I am writing to 

strongly urge you to keep this critical flight in operation. 

As the senior partner of a multi-client lobbying firm in Lansing, MI, I, and our firm's employees, 

travel to Washington, D.C. firequently using this route that is offered by Sun Country. We enjoy 

not only the convenience of a non-stop flight to our nation's capitol, but also the convenience of 

being able to fly out of Lansing, rather than Detroit or Flint. 

Thank you very much for considering our views. Please do not hesitate to contact me at my 

office at (517) 372-0860.': 

Sincerely, 

Ciu ^ JTO^S IM^ 

Ellen Hoekstra, Senior Partner 

• >! i'-..:-J"7t - '• . '.'uj . i< 

•;^ Mif - ;i]j( : t iwm.x. )]. H u.i;';.i^-r.irci. .C')p}'t.';") .^_{!JJJ tii y'Sn^MA't' /<[{' y rut; f '•. jjujj.t GLU.U, ;• 

i:\\ \.,.r /.or fo \ ';GL fjjjv -^uijcaj ijji!].',' JU ob^i;tl .0!i 

(• f'f ?;i o\/,^w < ,o- -iiL". ',"ii.,i:jG?, iK'ij-fifob pv,'rA>)u-ii: -,^, >rj' '^i' 1. •; ( ' MJ) V.-' \ '"> i;ii-".,. 

Ellen Hoekstra 

1bdd Tennis 

Stephanie lohnson 

.Noah Srniih
#### Richard Edward BRIDGES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-891

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                               FOURTH AMENDMENT
                    FOR COMMERCE PLAZA, OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS
                    ---------------------------------------

     This Fourth Amendment to Lease ("Fourth Amendment") is made as of November
11, 1999, between Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York corporation
("Landlord") and SPR, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").

                                   RECITALS:

     Landlord and Tenant entered into a certain Lease dated November 29, 1995
(the "Lease") which was amended by that certain First Lease Amendment dated June
3, 1996 ("First Amendment") and that certain Second Amendment dated August 31,
1998 ("Second Amendment") and that Third Amendment dated December 30, 1998
("Third Amendment") (the Lease, First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Third
Amendment are hereinafter collectively called the "Amended Lease") pursuant to
which Tenant leased certain space located on the seventh floor of the building
at 2015 Spring Road, commonly known as Commerce Plaza, (the "Building") located
in Oak Brook, Illinois, the Leased Premises being more particularly described in
the Lease and have agreed to expand the Leased Premises by adding certain
parcels of space on the sixth floor of the Building as enumerated in the Second
Amendment;

     Landlord and Tenant desire to make certain changes to the Amended Lease as
set forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, to reflect the agreements of the parties, the parties amend
the Amended Lease as follows:

     1.  Definitions. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms
         -----------
shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Amended Lease.

     2.  Expansion Commencement Dates. The "Third Expansion Commencement Date"
         ----------------------------
as referenced in the Third Amendment is hereby changed from June 1, 1999 to July
16, 1999.

     3.  Continuation. Except as specifically herein amended, all terms and
         ------------
conditions contained in the Lease with respect to the Leased Premises shall
remain in full force and effect. In the event that any provisions of this Fourth
Amendment shall conflict with the Lease, this Fourth Amendment shall govern.
<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Fourth Amendment has been executed as of the date
first above written.


LANDLORD:                                    TENANT:


METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE                  SPR, INC., a Delaware
COMPANY, a New York corporation              corporation


By:/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]^^                         By: Stephen T. Gambill
   ---------------------------------            -----------------------------
   Its: Assistant Vice-President                Its: VP & CFO
       -----------------------------                -------------------------
No. 12-417.

#### Sandifer et al. *v.*United States Steel Corp.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to United Arab Emirates  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to United Arab Emirates  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 4.18   | 3.87   | 3.46   | 3.99  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.91   | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12954]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Council on the Humanities

Meeting

May 11, 1998.
    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Humanities will be held in Washington, DC 
on May 27, 1998.
    The purpose of this meeting is to advise the recently appointed 
Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities with respect to 
policies and procedures for carrying out his functions.
    The meeting will be held in the Old Post Office Building, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. 
Because the Council will consider information relating to the internal 
practices of the agency and information the disclosure of which would 
significantly affect implementation of proposed agency action, the 
meeting will not be open to the public pursuant to subsections (c)(2) 
and (9)(B) of Section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. I have made 
this determination under the authority granted to me by the Chairman's 
Delegation of Authority dated July 19, 1993.
    Further information about this meeting can be obtained from Ms. 
Nancy E. Weiss, Advisory Committee Management Officer, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 530, Washington, DC 20506, Telephone: 
(202) 606-8322, TDD: (202) 606-8282.
Nancy E. Weiss,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12954 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NUREG--1625]


Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plant; Proposed Standard 
Technical Specifications

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is announcing the 
availability of NUREG-1625, ``Proposed Standard Technical 
Specifications for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plants,'' a draft 
report for comment dated March 1998.

DATES: Submit comments by August 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Draft NUREG-1625 is available for inspection and copying for 
a fee at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), 
Washington, DC 20555-0001. A free single copy of draft NUREG-1625 may 
be requested by writing to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Printing 
and Graphics Branch, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Webb, Division of Reactor 
Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Telephone: 301-415-
1347.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Given the number of nuclear power plants 
that have permanently shutdown, the NRC has recognized the need for 
generic guidance on appropriate Technical Specifications for 
permanently shutdown power reactors.
    This NUREG report describes the NRC staff's proposed Standard 
Technical Specifications for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse Plants 
(STS PDW). The report includes a detailed discussion of the strategy 
followed for determining the contents of the STS PDW. The proposed STS 
PDW is being published to provide the general public and the nuclear 
community with an opportunity for comment.
    The contents of the proposed STS PDW are based primarily on the 
Standard Technical Specifications, Westinghouse Plants (NUREG-1431, 
Revision 1, April 1995), which in turn were based on the criteria in 
the NRC Final Policy Statement on Technical Specifications Improvements 
for Nuclear Power Reactors (SECY-93-067, 58 FR 39132; July 22, 1993). 
The proposed STS PDW reflect the experience gained in the development 
of the Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications (PDTS) for the 
Trojan Nuclear Plant, the first PDTS approved by the NRC that were 
based on the improved STS for Westinghouse Plants. As licensees begin 
to plan permanent shutdown of their nuclear power plants, they are 
encouraged to adopt the STS PDW to an extent that is practical and 
consistent with their licensing basis.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of May 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Marvin M. Mendonca,
Acting Director, Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project 
Director, Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-12275 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Stevermer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milastar Corporation and Subsidiary;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: March 12, 2007/s/ Dennis J. StevermerDennis J. StevermerChief Executive Officer