alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Order filed January 8, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00505

- CR

____________ MARK DWIGHT MASON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1529090



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant filed a motion asking to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). The motion is granted.Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 208th District Court to afford

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record i n accordance with local procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before January 23,
2019 ; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appell ant file his pro se brief with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
No. 12-7689.

#### Kline *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

101 

CA 15-01066 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

PETER W. BEYER, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC., ZOOM TAN, INC., 

AND ROCKFORD CONSTRUCTION CO., 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

LAW OFFICE OF JOHN WALLACE, BUFFALO, MAURO LILLING NAPARTY LLP,

WOODBURY (ANTHONY F. DESTEFANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (SEAN E. COONEY OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R.

Glownia, J.), entered February 12, 2015. The order granted the motion

of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability

pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) and denied the cross

motion of defendants for partial summary judgment dismissing

plaintiff’s Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) causes of action. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed on January 4, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# C_2010158EN.01000401.xml

| 18.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5755 — Schneider Electric/Areva T&D)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 158/02

On 26 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5755. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5755. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 6,346 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14,516 | 25,125 | 11,789 | 7,312  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. CALCAGNI, C.

1797 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/14/2017

CP-48-CR-0003287-2014 (Northampton)

Affirmed
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar   | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep   | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |       |     | 3,390 |     |     |     |     |     | 3,404 |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|2022                                                                                                                              | 3,509 |     |       |     |     |     |     |     |       |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 10.1

           AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE

      This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE (the
"Amendment") is made this 31st day of March, 2006, by and between PAID, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("PAID") and Leslie Rotman ("Seller").

                                    RECITALS

      A. PAID and Seller are parties to a Settlement Agreement dated May 9, 2005
(the "Settlement Agreement"), whereby PAID, directly or through a designee,
received the right to purchase from Seller 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock (as
adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend,
reclassification, recapitalization, share exchange, reorganization, or other
similar event or transaction) at a purchase price per share of the share's par
value, $.001, subject only to such other terms agreeable to PAID, which right is
expected to terminate on May 6, 2006.

      B. PAID and Seller desire to amend the Settlement Agreement to extend the
option termination date for one year.

                                    AGREEMENT

      For good and valuable consideration of One Dollar ($1.00), the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as
follows:

      1. Recitals; Definitions. The recitals set forth above are true and
correct in every respect and are incorporated herein by reference. Any
capitalized terms contained herein not defined herein shall have the meaning
assigned to such term in the Settlement Agreement.

      2. Call Option. The termination date for the option rights granted to PAID
by Seller pursuant to Section 1.2 of the Settlement Agreement is hereby extended
for one year, until May 6, 2007.

      3. General. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts,
all of which when taken together shall constitute one Amendment. This Amendment
shall be binding upon each party's respective successors and assigns. All words
used herein shall be deemed to refer to the singular, plural, masculine,
feminine or neuter as the identity of the person or entity or the context may
require. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.

                                           /s/ Leslie Rotman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Leslie Rotman

                                           PAID, INC.

                                           By:     /s/ Gregory Rotman
                                                   -----------------------------
                                           Name:   Gregory Rotman
                                           Title:  President
No. 12-7460.

#### Perry *v.*Yelich, Superintendent, Bare Hill Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 15.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

                        MER Telemanagement Solutions Ltd.
                     22 Zarhin st., Ra'anana, 43662, Israel

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Files No. 333-12014 and No. 333-123321) and Form F-3
(File No. 333-128225) of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd., of our report dated
January 19, 2007 relating to the financial statements of Jusan, S.A. as of
December 31, 2006 and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2005 and
2006, which reports appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mer
Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2007.


/s/ BDO Audiberia Auditores, S.l.
---------------------------------

BDO AUDIBERIA AUDITORES, S.L.

Madrid, Spain, April 2, 2008
076P17

#### George Burns, Mark McCann, and Charles Bartlett, Trustees of Park’s Chapel Free Will Baptist Church v. Kingdom Impact Global Ministries, Inc.

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1313)

Denied
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 21a0193n.06

Case No. 19

- 4268

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

JAHMIR CHRISTOPHER FRANK
, Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.

GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI, LLC
, Defendant

- Appellee

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: ROGERS, BUSH, and LARSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. The district court dismissed Jahmir Frank’s suit for negligent destruction

of medical records after Frank failed to make any argument that Ohio recognizes such a tort. His
brief before us is similarly “devoid of any legal argument” in that regard. Cooper v. Commercial

Sav. Bank
, 5 91 F. App’x 508, 509 (6th Cir. 2015). The striking legal emptiness of his brief means

that he abandoned the argument and forfeited his appeal

. Id. Accordingly, we affirm

.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1659

To amend the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act of 1985.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 16 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MOYNIHAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act

of 1985.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That this Act may be cited as ‘‘The Law Enforcement Of4 ficers Protection Act of 1985, Amendment.’’

5 SEC. 101. ARMOR-PIERCING AMMUNITION DEFINITION.

6 Section 921(a)(17) of title 18, United States Code,

7 is amended by revising subparagraph (B) and adding a

8 new subparagraph (C) to read as follows:

9 ‘‘(B) The term ‘armor piercing ammunition’ means—

10 ‘‘(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be

11 used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely
2

S 1659 IS

1 (excluding the presence of traces of other sub2 stances) from one or a combination of tungsten al3 loys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or

4 depleted uranium; or

5 ‘‘(ii) a jacketed projectile which may be used in

6 a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more

7 than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.

8 ‘‘(C) The term ‘armor piercing ammunition’ does not

9 include shotgun shot required by Federal or State environ10 mental or game regulations for hunting purposes, a fran11 gible projectile designed for target shooting, a projectile

12 which the Secretary finds is primarily intended to be used

13 for sporting purposes, or any other projectile or projectile

14 core which the Secretary finds is intended to be used for

15 industrial purposes, including a charge used in an oil and

16 gas well perforating device.’’.

Æ
# L_2010312EN.01002201.xml

| 27.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 312/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 312/22

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 26 November 2010

authorising Portugal to use data relating to years earlier than the last year but one in order to calculate the VAT own resources base

(notified under document C(2010) 8209)

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(2010/720/EU, Euratom)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89 of 29 May 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) thereof,

After consulting the Advisory Committee on Own Resources,

Whereas:

| (1) | Portugal has requested authorisation from the Commission to use national accounts for years earlier than the last year but one in order to calculate the VAT own resources base for the financial year 2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Portugal has requested authorisation from the Commission to use national accounts for years earlier than the last year but one in order to calculate the VAT own resources base for the financial year 2009.

| (2) | For the purposes of the breakdown of transactions by statistical category provided for in Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, Portugal is unable to use national accounts relating to the last year but one before the financial year for which VAT resources base is to be calculated, since only the national accounts relating to 2006 are sufficiently detailed to enable the weighted average rate to be calculated for the financial year 2009. Portugal should therefore be authorised to use national accounts relating to 2006 in order to calculate the weighted average rate for the financial year 2009, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

For the purposes of the breakdown of transactions by statistical category provided for in Article 4(4) of Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1553/89, Portugal is unable to use national accounts relating to the last year but one before the financial year for which VAT resources base is to be calculated, since only the national accounts relating to 2006 are sufficiently detailed to enable the weighted average rate to be calculated for the financial year 2009. Portugal should therefore be authorised to use national accounts relating to 2006 in order to calculate the weighted average rate for the financial year 2009,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the purposes of the breakdown of transactions by statistical category, Portugal is authorised to use data taken from the national accounts relating to 2006 in order to calculate the VAT own resources base for the financial year 2009.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 26 November 2010.

For the Commission

Janusz LEWANDOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 155, 7.6.1989, p. 9.

1

---
11**EXHIBIT 31.1**I, Joel Faden, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mills Music Trust;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; *4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

125. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August  10, 2010 /s/ Joel Faden   Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.   Chief Financial Individual providing accountingservices    * The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash transactions and do notinclude transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basisof accounting. The Trust is required to distribute all funds received. Accordingly, the Trust hasnot prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 98-30613

Summary Calendar

_________________

REGINALD BROWN,

Plaintiff,

KEVIN P. GIPSON,

Appellant,

versus

EMERSON ELECTRICCOMPANY;LOUISVILLELADDERCO,

INC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(97-CV-3117-L)

July 1, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant, Kevin P. Gipson, appeals the district court’s order requiring him to pay $750.00

in attorneys’ feesto the Defendant-Appellees. The district court sanctioned Gipson for his repeated

refusals to comply with discovery orders, as well as his failure to appear before the court for

numerous motion hearings. The imposition of sanctions is a matter of discretion for the district court,

which we review only for abuse. See Shipes v. Trinity Industries, 987 F.2d 311, 323 (5th Cir. 1993).

An attorneymaybe held liable for reasonable expenses, including attorney’sfees, caused byhisfailure

to comply with discovery. See id. 
-2-

In his appellate brief, Gipson attempts to explain his failure to attend one particular hearing.

However, he provides no basis for reversing the district court’s imposition of sanctions. The

sanctionsstemmed from numerousincidents in which Gipson failed to comply with court orders and

failed to appear at hearings. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in imposing sanctions.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 12-7629.

No. 12-7783.

#### Williams *v.*United States; and Anderson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 490 Fed. Appx. 557.