alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
zntr_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  






 





 




  





7











  






 






	 	ZENTRIC (HK) LIMITED
	 
	Suite 17, B1.1, 63-85 Turner Street
	Port Melbourne, Victoria 3207
	Voice: +613 9646 6641
	Facsimile: +613 9012 4404
	Email: info@zbatt.com
	 	 
	 	Date: March 20, 2012





 


REF:           ZNTR-HK-MEI-EPC-120320




 


To:


Mr. S. Chin KIM, CEO MATINEE ENERGY INC.


335 Wilmot Drive, Ste 200


Tucson, Arizona, 85711


USA


 


Dear Mr. Kim,


 


RE:           CONFIRMATION TO ISSUE PRESS RELEASE AS PER OUR EPC AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 7, 2012


 


The EPC agreement dated January 7, 2012 was suspended until further confirmation on the Chinese solar module supplier’s confirmation of stock for delivery from China for our project in US.


 


We have now received confirmation from the solar module supplier’s schedule, thus meeting our commitment for solar module supply for the first 20 MW solar modules as specify on this EPC agreement, thus this EPC Agreement becomes effective as of March 20, 2012 after meeting the conditions as stated on the EPC Agreement dated January 7, 2012.


 


We have received your permission on March 16, 2012 based on item 11 under the heading, Publicity of the EPC Agreement dated January 2012 to issue a jointly approved press release ZenHK-PR-307[v2][1] V3- EDITED (attached in this letter as an attachment) on March 20, 2012 at 0900 hours New York, USA.


 


As this is a significant event in our company, our holding company, Zentric Inc. (OTCBB: ZNTR) will comply under the SEC requirement in issuing an 8K filing today on the EPC Agreement.


 


We are looking forward to the success completion of this project within the time frame scheduled on this agreement.


 


 



	Yours sincerely,	 
		 
	William Tien	 
	President	 
	
ZENTRIC (HK) LIMITED

	 





 


 


 8
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mexco Energy Corporation as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such Report. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August 9, 2012 | /s/ Nicholas C. Taylor  |   |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                            | Nicholas C. Taylor      |   |
|                            | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                            |                    |   |
| Date:  August 9, 2012 | /s/ Tamala L. McComic   |   |
|                            | Tamala L. McComic       |   |
|                            | Chief Financial Officer |   |
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2010202EN.01001601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/16 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/412/EU of 13 July 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 195 of 27 July 2010](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2010_195_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, footnote 1:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | See page 5 of this Official Journal.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | See page 1 of this Official Journal.’. |

---
# C_2010143EN.01002501.xml

| 2.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5874 — Barclays/Blackstone/Portfolio Hotels)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 143/06

On 21 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5874. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5874. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 10.1


    
      

    


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    Richard
      J. Kurtz

    Nine
      Duck
      Pond Road

    Alpine,
      New Jersey 07632

     

    March
      20,
      2006

    


    


    LaPolla
      Industries, Inc.

    15402
      Vantage Parkway East

    Suite
      322

    Houston,
      Texas 77032

    Attention:
      Michael T. Adams, CEO

     

    
      	 	
              Re:

            	
              LaPolla
                Industries, Inc. (the “Company”)

            


    

    Working
      Capital Commitment

    


    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      is
      in response to your request that I provide an assurance as to funding of One
      Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) to be used as working capital
      to facilitate growth and expansion for the Company, as and when such funds
      are
      deemed required by management. I hereby confirm that I so commit to provide
      during fiscal 2006, upon the request of management, One Million Five Hundred
      Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) in cash funds for use as working capital by the
      Company. I understand that such funding will take the form of a demand loan
      bearing 6% interest per annum. This commitment will either be satisfied from
      personal funds, or, I will cause the funds to be otherwise provided by an
      appropriate lending institution.

    


    I
      have
      been further advised and understand that the aforesaid commitment and obligation
      will be superseded in the event and to the extent that the Company is
      independently funded by a third party source in an amount of at least One
      Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000), either privately or
      institutionally, during fiscal 2006. In such event, I or the lending institution
      utilized by me, to the extent any funds have been loaned pursuant to the above
      commitment, shall be promptly repaid.

     

    
      	 	
              Very
                Truly Yours,

            
	 	 
	 	
              /s/
                Richard J. Kurtz

            
	 	 
	 	
              Richard
                J. Kurtz
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1355

To amend chapter 91 of title 28, United States Code, to provide that the

United States Court of Federal Claims may have jurisdiction over certain

pending claims, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 4 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. HEFLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 91 of title 28, United States Code, to

provide that the United States Court of Federal Claims

may have jurisdiction over certain pending claims, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OF UNITED STATES COURT OF

4 FEDERAL CLAIMS OVER CERTAIN PENDING

5 CLAIMS.

6 (a) REPEAL.—Section 1500 of title 28, United States

7 Code, is repealed.
2

•S 1355 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

2 The table of sections for chapter 91 of title 28, United

3 States Code, is amended by striking out the item relating

4 to section 1500.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 32010M5990 - EN

*|*

# 32010M5990

**Commission Decision of 10/11/2010 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.5990 - INVESTOR / MOLNLYCKE) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

(.PICT.)(.PICT.) |EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 10.11.2010

SG-Greffe(2010) D/17952

C(2010) 7928

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.5990 - INVESTOR/ MOLNLYCKE Notification of 07.10.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 277, 14.10.2010 p.19

1. On 07.10.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Investor AB ("Investor", Sweden), controlled by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Mölnlycke AB ("Mölnlycke", Sweden, currently jointly controlled by Investor and Morgan Stanley) by purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Investor: industrial holding company active in the following business areas: core investments (shareholdings in listed companies), operating investments (notably in Aleris, a private healthcare company and in Mölnlycke), private equity investments and financial investments;

- Mölnlycke: manufacturer and supplier of single-use surgical and wound care products, primarily for the professional healthcare sector.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(d) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the European Commission, (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
No. 12-7319.

#### Elkins *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 329    | 38,469 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Order entered October 20, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00992
- CV FRISCO SQUARE DEVELO PERS, LLC, Appellant
V. KPITCH ENTERPRISES, LLC, Appellee On Appea l from the 417th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417
- 01983
- 2016



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s October 17, 2016 motion for extension of time to file appellee’s brief and appellant’s October 18, 2016 response to ap pellee’s motion. The Court
GRANTS appellee’s request. We ORDER appellee to file the brief within TWENTY DAYS
from the date of this order.
The Court is directed to set this case at issue.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 15.4

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Files No. 333-12014 and No. 333-123321) and Form F-3
(File No. 333-128225) of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd., of our report dated
February 19, 2009 relating to the financial statements of MTS Asia Limited as of
December 31, 2008 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008, which
report appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mer Telemanagement
Solutions Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2008.


/S/ BDO MCCABE LO LIMITED

BDO MCCABE LO LIMITED
Certified Public Accountants

March 30, 2009
No. 12-6891.

#### Marsh *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Ohio Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Ohio Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 50     | 63     | 71     | 69     | 96     | 88     | 87    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 14     | 16     | 20     | 36     | 32     | 37     | 39     | 40     | 42    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 43     | 40     | 37     | 17     | 18     | 12     | 8      | 5      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 127    | 202    | 468    | 3,464  | 3,542  | 5,011  | 4,578  | 3,043 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,527  | 3,702  | 2,038  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6409

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

PATRICK JEROME BOYD, a/k/a LD, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., 

District Judge. (3:10-cr-00072-MOC-1; 3:14-cv-00199-MOC) 

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Patrick Jerome Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, William 

Michael Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, 

North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Patrick Jerome Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Trustees

MESABI TRUST

New York, New York

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying condensed balance sheet of MESABI TRUST as of October 31,2008, and the related condensed statements of income for the three andnine-month periods ended October 31, 2008 and the condensed statement ofcash flows for the nine-month period ended October 31, 2008.  Thesefinancial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’s Trustees.

 

We conducted our reviewin accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States).  A review of interim financial information consistsprincipally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of personsresponsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantiallyless in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective ofwhich is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements takenas a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our review, weare not aware of any material modifications that should be made to theaccompanying interim financial statements, referred to above, for them to be inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America.

 

The balance sheet of MESABI TRUST as of January 31,2008, and the related statements of income, unallocated reserve and trustcorpus and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) wereaudited by other auditors and their report dated April 6, 2008, expressedan unqualified opinion on those statements but the other auditors have notperformed any auditing procedures since that date.

 

 

/s/ WIPFLI LLP

 

St. Paul, Minnesota

December 3, 2008

 

1

----
#### J.F., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D18-0082

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 11, 2018

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Wilber L. Cooke, II, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Caroline Johnson Levine, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

J.F. petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he is entitled to immediate release from involuntary inpatient placement at Stewart-Marchman-Act in Daytona Beach, Florida, because the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that he is a danger to himself or others. The State properly concedes error and agrees that the wiit of habeas corpus should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the petition and order his immediate release. See § 394.467(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2017); C.W. v. State, 214 So.3d 796, 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (citing In re Lehrke, 12 So.3d 307, 308-09 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)). No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.