alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gary P. Snyder, Respondent, v Michael Fabrizio et al., Appellants.

[770 NYS2d 533]

— Appeal from that part of an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Garni, J.), entered August 23, 2002, that determined title to real property in favor of plaintiff upon a decision of the court.

It is hereby ordered the order and judgment insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and judgment is granted in favor of defendants as follows: It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that defendants are the fee title owners of the entirety of the smaller disputed area as depicted in a survey map of Jay D. Holbrook, LLS (license No. 50047) dated October 11, 2000.

Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order and judgment granting plaintiff title by adverse possession to a small disputed area of defendants’ property. We disagree with Supreme Court that plaintiff met his burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he acquired the small disputed area by adverse possession, and we therefore reverse *(see generally Falco v Pollitts,*298 AD2d 838 [2002]). “ ‘To acquire title to real property by adverse possession . . . the possessor . . . [must] establish that the character of the possession *1465is “hostile and under a claim of right, actual, open and notorious, exclusive and continuous” ... for the statutory period of 10 years’ ” *(Palumbo v Heumann,*295 AD2d 935, 935 [2002]; *see Tubolino v Drake,*178 AD2d 951 [1991]). We conclude from our review of the record that the evidence was not sufficient as a matter of law to support the court’s finding that plaintiff demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, exclusive possession of the small disputed area for the requisite 10-year period *(see Falco,*298 AD2d at 839; *see also Mastin v Village of Lima,*86 AD2d 777, 778 [1982]). We note that the court concluded that plaintiff’s evidence was not clear and convincing with regard to a larger disputed area that wholly contained the smaller disputed area because there was conflicting testimony about the mowing and cultivation practices of plaintiff and defendants with respect to those portions of the larger disputed area outside of the smaller disputed area. That conflicting testimony made it impossible for plaintiff to establish his exclusive possession of the larger area for a continuous period of 10 years. The testimony concerning the smaller disputed area, however, was just as conflicting, if not more so, than the testimony concerning the larger disputed area. Therefore, we reverse the order and judgment insofar as appealed from and grant judgment in favor of defendants decreeing that they are the fee title owners of the entirety of the smaller disputed area as depicted in plaintiffs exhibit 21 *(see Jones v Breheny,*280 AD2d 973 [2001]). Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1217 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1217

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
            To repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.
    (c) Notice of Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Not later than 10 
days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services shall post on the public website of the 
Department of Health and Human Services a notice of--
            (1) the rescission, pursuant to subsection (b), of the 
        unobligated balance of funds made available by such section 
        4002; and
            (2) the amount of such funds so rescinded.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1217

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

            To repeal the Prevention and Public Health Fund.
```
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                              
|No chart available.                                                              
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27586-27587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., Civil Action No. 98-2045 (AMW) was 
lodged on April 30, 1998, in the United States District Court for the 
District of New Jersey. The proposed Consent Decree will resolve the 
United States' claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et 
seq., on behalf of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (``ACOE''), U.S. 
Department of Energy (``DOE''), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 
(``EPA'') and U.S. Department of the Interior against W.R. Grace & Co.-
Conn. (``W.R. Grace''). The Complaint alleges that W.R. Grace is liable 
under Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607.
    Pursuant to the Consent Decree, W.R. Grace will pay to the United 
States $30 million in settlement of both DOE's and ACOE's cleanup 
costs, $1.5 million in settlement of EPA's costs, and $270,000 to DOE 
to settle natural resource damage claims. In addition, if the Consent 
Decree is entered, the United States will also be paid interest that 
has been accruing on monies that W.R. Grace has maintained in an escrow 
account since August 1997. That interest is currently approximately 
$400,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-1200.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, Federal 
Building, 7th Floor, 970 Broad Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check made payable to 
the Consent Decree Library in the amount of

[[Page 27587]]

$33.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs). If a copy of the Consent 
Decree without the attachments is sufficient, please specify that fact 
and enclose a check in the amount of $8.50.
Joel M. Gross,
Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-13177 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Haiti  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Haiti  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 10.39 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10.39  | 10.39  | 10.39  | 10.39  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1

    Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                   CERTIFICATE OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who are the Co-Chief Executive Officers of Cox
Technologies, Inc. ("Company") hereby certifies as follows:

         The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Company ("Report"), which
accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  12-15-04    /s/ Brian D. Fletcher             /s/ Kurt C. Reid
       --------    ---------------------------       --------------------------
                   Brian D. Fletcher                 Kurt C. Reid
                   Co-Chief Executive Officer        Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                       A-4
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE R I S S HA WAN, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73427 A ge nc yN o. A 076- 705- 945 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G er i s S haw an, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I sr ae l , pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of a B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rs um m a r i l ya f f i rm i ng a n i m m i gr a t i on ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n f o rw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. T hi s c ourtr e vi e w s de novo que s t i ons of 

# FI LED SEP 30 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73427 2 law , C er ez o v. Mukasey , 512 F . 3d 1163, 1166 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , e xc e ptt o the e xt e nt tha tde f e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the gove rni ng s t a tut e s a nd r e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 37 1 F . 3d 53 2, 53 5 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). T hi s c ou rt r e v ie w s f a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e . Zehat ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1 1 8 2 , 1 1 8 4 - 8 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 6 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e r e j e c tS ha w a n’ s c l a i m tha the f a c e s ac l e a rpr obabi l i tyof pe r s e c ut i on on a c c o u n t o f

e ith e rh is p o litic a l o p in io n , se e Sori an o v. H older , 569 F . 3d 1162, 1164- 65 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( fe arof harm w as no ton ac coun tof po l i t i ca l op i ni on w here c r i m i na l s w e r e m ot i va t e d t o ha rm pe t i t i one rt o r e t a l i a t e f ori nf orm i ng on the m ) , or h is m e m b e r s h ip in ap a rtic u lars o c ia l g r o up , s e e id. a t1166 ( r e j e c t i ng “ gove rnm e nt in f o rm a n ts ” a s ap a rtic u lars o c ia l g r o up ) . F u rth e r , s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts the I J ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tS ha w a n f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e the I s r a e l i gove rnm e nt w ou l d b e unabl e or unw i l l i ng t o con trol the i nd i vi du al s w ho threa t ened t o h arm h im . See Castro-P er ezv. G on zales , 4 0 9 F .3 d1 0 6 9 , 1 0 7 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . A c c o r d in g ly , S h a w a n ’s w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im f

a ils . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Exhibit
        (32.1)
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The
        undersigned officer hereby
        certifies as to the Report on Form 10-Q/A of Met-Pro Corporation for the
        fiscal
        quarter ended April 30, 2007, that (i) the report fully complies with the
        requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934,
        and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Met-Pro
        Corporation.
  
 Dated:  February
                  12, 2008
              
              /s/
                  Raymond J. De HontRaymond
                  J. De HontChairman,
                  Chief Executive Officer and President
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Price of Lake Charles, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Egypt  (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Price of Lake Charles, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Egypt  (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.73   | 6.60   | 6.64   | 7.14   | 3.29  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3.93   | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**InterL~** Status Standarcs for TSDt's 50 fR 16044-8 April 23, 1985 

# e F EDE RA.L RECXJ I**RE.~** ENT ReM CITE I STATE**AlJl~OP1TY** I SI'ATu'TE 

### I REGULATION 

### I IF**DIFF~RE~r** fROM FEDERAL**R£QUIRE~!'r!', EXPLAI~**  PART 265 - I!\'TERIM STA."lD\RDS FOR**~'ERS** ;',,"lD OPERATORS OF TSDF I S
SUBPART K - S:';RFACE 11'1.rDUNCt.1.£!\7S

1173-303-045 

### 11 

## n- -',n'-400(,' 

# I ditto \265.222(b) REQUI REMTh"'!'S 

## I 1265.222(a) variance freeboard t GE!'lERAL OPERATI!'X:;

t SPECIAL RroUIREME!\7S FOR IGNITABLE OR PE.AcrlVE v...:"\STE limitations on placement**265.~29(a)** ditto 

## I variance 265.229(b) ditto solely for emeroencies :265.229(c) ditto

ditto GrnERA.!. OPERATI!'X:; RroJlREMENTS conditions for land treatment 265.272{a) 

# e t**=~:":"';;:~~:";;-':'~-=-"":"":::=""=";""T-=~::';::"---,----------r------------- SU8P.~~**  N
-**~"lDf!LLS**

ditto ditto CLOSURE**.~** POST-CLOSURE --.- .--

_ final cover \265.310(a)**I~...:....::...::.::....:..::..:.-.-T-----------------** post-closure 1265.310 (b) SPECI.A.!.**REQUlRE~"'!'S** FOR**CO~~ATNERS** minimum 90% full 265.315(a) ditto crushed I 1265.315(b) d i t t o 

# e**~~ril** 23,**~985** -**?a~e** :**~f** 1
#### Renord JACQUES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-608

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Barry M. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CF009895A.

*Affirmed.*