alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,100,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,298,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 32,464,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,203,094
<PP&E>                                      33,456,984
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,438,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,597,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,443,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,332,791
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,505,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,597,765
<SALES>                                     16,394,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,394,682
<CGS>                                       12,957,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,957,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             663,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (404,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (137,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (267,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (267,029)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1
 Certification
required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(b) and section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 I, Tim
Hunt, Chief Executive Officer of HuntMountain Resources Ltd., certify
that:
 
 1.           This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HuntMountain Resources Ltd. fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HuntMountain
Resources Ltd..
 
 
 Date:
      May 19, 2008/s/ Tim HuntTim
      Hunt, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
bOf: os-T: 1tf1(P-l~ 

~~~~~~ Gogebic-Iron County Airport 

GOGEBIC-IRON AIRPORT BOARD 

E5560 Airport Road 

Ironwood, Michigan 49938 

Phone: 906-932-3121 

FAX: 906-932-4401 

Joseph Bonovetz, Chairman Duane R. DuRay, Manager 

Robert Berg Jim Oliver Mary Lou Nyderek, Secretary Don Erspamer Brian Tarro 

LeRoy Kangas John Wiita 

Bob Morin e-mail: iwd@chartermi.net 

January 11, 2010 

Dennis DeVany 

Essential Air Services Division, X-53 

DOT Office of Aviation Analysis, Room 6401 

400 Seventh St., SW 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. DeVany, 

As you are well aware, the Gogebic-Iron County Airport will once again be going through 

airline selection to fulfill the essential air service agreements. Over the past couple of years 

we have experienced several hardships in regard to our current air carrier. The current flight 

schedule for Great Lakes Airlines inhibits our traveling public from access to convenient, 

connecting flights out of Milwaukee. They have also exhibited several issues with flight 

crews, mechanical reliability, and continuity within their own operations and the ManisteeMilwaukee- Ironwood flights 

We have been very fortunate to be chosen to receive the Small Community Air Service Grant 

for advertising but even with such an aggressive marketing campaign we have been unable to 

increase the ridership out of Ironwood. In fact, our boarding have substantially decreased 

since the onset of Great Lakes Airlines. I believe the main contributing factor to declines in 

ridership stems from poor flight schedules out of Ironwood. A supporting example to a 

favorable flight schedule could be Manistee Airport's ridership increases, I have watched as 

their passenger boarding have climbed due to their early morning departures and late evening 

arrivals. 

I do realize that the current economic situation and the declining number of essential air 

service carriers is a contributing factor to your flexibility when considering air carriers, 

equipment, and flight schedules. We would like to stress the fact that our boarding have 

declined over 65 percent in the past two years and I would hope you would take flight 

schedules into consideration when publishing a request for proposals for Ironwood. 

Sincerely, 

Duane R. DuRay 

Airport Manager
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 I, John I. Von Lehman, certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Midland
Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.     The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 3, 2004
    
    /s/ John I. Von LehmanPrincipal Financial Officer
|                                                                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                               
|New York Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Marketers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               
|                                                                                                               
|New York Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Marketers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 16.99  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14.55  | 14.22  | 13.59  | 13.07  | 13.46  | 12.28  | 11.56  | 12.09  | 12.22  | 12.93 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13.78  | 14.26  | 16.41  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 12**MERCK & CO., INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESComputation Of Ratios Of Earnings To Fixed Charges($ in millions except ratio data)                           Six Months      Ended      June  Years Ended December 31,   30, 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001 Income from Continuing OperationsBefore Taxes $4,078.7  $7,363.9  $7,974.5  $9,051.6  $9,651.7  $9,948.1                          Add (Subtract):                        One-third of rents  32.9   68.2   71.9   75.6   67.2   64.2 Interest expense, gross  190.1   385.5   293.7   350.9   390.6   463.7 Interest capitalized,net of amortization  16.2   (1.0)  (21.3)  (30.1)  (36.9)  (66.1)Equity (income) loss from affiliates,net of distributions  (117.6)  (615.9)  (421.2)  79.2   (156.1)  (113.7)Preferred stock dividends, net of tax  59.5   120.0   151.0   150.9   164.3   199.6                    Earnings from Continuing Operations $4,259.8  $7,320.7  $8,048.6  $9,678.1  $10,080.8  $10,495.8                                             One-third of rents $32.9  $68.2  $71.9  $75.6  $67.2  $64.2 Interest expense, gross  190.1   385.5   293.7   350.9   390.6   463.7 Preferred stock dividends  81.5   166.7   207.1   215.6   234.7   285.1                    Fixed Charges from ContinuingOperations $304.5  $620.4  $572.7  $642.1  $692.5  $813.0                                             Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Chargesfrom Continuing Operations  14   12   14   15   15   13                    For purposes of computing these ratios, “earnings” consist of income from continuing operationsbefore taxes, one-third of rents (deemed by the Company to be representative of the interestfactor inherent in rents), interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, equity (income) lossfrom affiliates, net of distributions, and dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary companies.“Fixed charges” consist of one-third of rents, interest expense as reported in the Company’sconsolidated financial statements and dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary companies.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1529

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit the selection of an

employee labor organization through the signing of a labor organization

membership card by a majority of employees and a subsequent election,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit the

selection of an employee labor organization through the

signing of a labor organization membership card by a

majority of employees and a subsequent election, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations Rep5 resentative Amendment Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1529 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF SELECTED LABOR REPRESENTA2 TIVE.

3 Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act (29

4 U.S.C. 159) is amended by adding at the end the following

5 new subsection:

6 ‘‘(f) Not later than 30 days after the receipt of signed

7 union recognition cards, which designate an entity as the

8 employee’s labor organization, from 60 percent of the em9 ployees of the employer, the Board shall direct an expe10 dited election with respect to the selection of such entity

11 as the exclusive collective bargaining representative of

12 such employees. Such expedited election, as directed by the

13 Board, may not be delayed for any reason or purpose. The

14 Board shall promulgate regulations that implement rules

15 and procedures to address any challenges with respect to

16 the designation or selection of an exclusive collective bar17 gaining representative under this subsection, which may

18 be brought only after the expedited election.’’.

Æ
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 2.29   | 2.92   | 2.71   | 3.05   | 3.29   | 3.00   | 2.14  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.01   | 2.04   | 2.06   | 1.97   | 1.82   | 1.89   | 1.85   | 2.04   | 2.29   | 2.29  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2.32   | 2.57   | 2.52   | 3.03   | 3.05   | 3.28   | 3.37   | 3.46   | 3.38   | 3.46  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.47   | 3.14   | 3.33   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Sabine Pass, LA Exports to Egypt Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Sabine Pass, LA Exports to Egypt Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul   | Aug   | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | -----
|2016                                                                                                                              |       |     |     |     |     |     |       |       |     |     |     | 3,606
|2017                                                                                                                              |       |     |     |     |     |     | 3,464 | 3,317 |     |     |     |      
|2018                                                                                                                              | 6,554 |     |     |     |     |     |       |       |     |     |     |      
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Page 1 of 3

Express Terms

6 NYCRR Part 211, General Prohibitions

Sec.

211.1 [Definitions 

211.2] Air pollution prohibited 

211.[3] 2 Visible emissions limited 

[211.4 Volatile organic compounds prohibited

211.5 Cutback asphalt prohibited]

Section 211.1 [Definitions

(a) ‘Asphalt.’ The dark brown to black cementitious material (solid, semisolid or liquid in consistency) of 

which the main constituents are bitumens which occur naturally or as a residue of petroleum refining.

(b) ‘Cutback asphalt.’ Any asphalt which has been liquefied by blending with petroleum solvents (Diluents) or, 

in the case of some slow cure asphalts (road oils), which have been produced directly from the distillation of 

petroleum.

(c) ‘Penetrating prime coat.’ An application of low viscosity asphalt to an absorbent surface in order to prepare 

it for paving with an asphalt concrete.
Page 2 of 3

Section 211.2] Air pollution prohibited

No person shall cause or allow emissions of air contaminants to the outdoor atmosphere of such 

quantity, characteristic or duration which are injurious to human, plant or animal life or to property, or which 

unreasonably interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. Notwithstanding the existence of 

specific air quality standards or emission limits, this prohibition applies, but is not limited to, any particulate, 

fume, gas, mist, odor, smoke, vapor, pollen, toxic or deleterious emission, either alone or in combination with 

others. 

Section 211.[3] 2 Visible emissions limited

Except as permitted by a specific part of this Subchapter and for open fires for which a restricted 

burning permit has been issued, no person shall cause or allow any air contamination source to emit any 

material having an opacity equal to or greater than 20 percent (six minute average) except for one continuous 

six-minute period per hour of not more than 57 percent opacity. 

[Section 211.4 Volatile organic compounds prohibited

(a) The use of volatile organic compounds to liquefy asphalt used for paving is prohibited, except for:

(1) asphalt used in the production of long-life stockpile material for pavement patching and 

repair;

(2) asphalt applied at low ambient temperature from October 16th to May 1st ; and

(3) asphalt used as a penetrating prime coat for the purpose of preparing an untreated absorbent 

surface to receive an asphalt surface.
Page 3 of 3

(b) The amount of volatile organic compounds in emulsified asphalt, as determined by testing methods 

of the ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), may not exceed the following amounts in percent 

by weight:

(1) two percent for ASTM grades RS-1, SS-1, SS-1h, CSS-1, and CSS-1h;

(2) three percent for ASTM grades RS-2, CRS-1, CRS-2, HFRS-2 and HFMS-2h;

(3) 10 percent for ASTM grades MS-2 and HFMS-2; and

(4) 12 percent for ASTM grades CMS-2 and CMS-2h.]
#### IN the INTEREST OF: Z.I., a Minor Appeal of: K.R.

367 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/18/2017

CP-36-DP-0000053-2016

(Lancaster)

Affirmed