alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11940]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of a Change in Subject Matter of 
Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of subsection (e)(2) of the ``Government 
in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(2)), notice is hereby given 
that at its open meeting held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, April 28, 1998, 
the Corporation's Board of Directors determined, on motion of Director 
Joseph H. Neely (Appointive), seconded by Director Julie L. Williams 
(Acting Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Ms. Carolyn Buck, 
acting in the place and stead of Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, 
Office of Thrift Supervision), and Acting Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., 
that Corporation business required the withdrawal from the agenda for 
consideration at the meeting, on less than seven days' notice to the 
public, of the following matter: Memorandum re: General Counsel Opinion 
Regarding Interest Charges by Interstate State Banks.
    The Board further determined, by the same majority vote, that no 
notice earlier than April 22, 1998, of this change in the subject 
matter of the meeting was practicable.

    Dated: April 29, 1998.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11940 Filed 4-30-98; 2:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
No. 12-533.

#### Gallion *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12792]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 92 / Wednesday, May 13, 1998 / 
Notices

[[Page 26571]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Board of Directors Meeting

PLACE: ADF Headquarters.

DATE: Monday, 18 May 5:00-7:00 p.m. and Tuesday, 19 May 9:00-11:00 a.m.

STATUS: Open.

Agenda

Monday, 18 May 1998

5:00-7:00 p.m.  Meeting

Tuesday, 19 May 1998

9:00 a.m.  Chairman's Report; President's Report; Trade and Investment 
Initiative
11:00 a.m.  Adjournment

    If you have any questions or comments, please direct them to Paul 
Magid, General Counsel, who can be reached at (202) 673-3916.
William R. Ford,
President.
[FR Doc. 98-12792 Filed 5-8-98; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
No. 12-7532.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 12    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 14     | 14     | 13     | 13    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 13     | 12     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 12     | 12    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 12     | 12     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7048.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
NO. 12-15-00025-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE

MARRIAGE OF LESLIE SUE FLOYD 

AND BRADLEY DEAN CODY AND IN 

THE INTEREST OF BILLY DEAN 

CODY, A CHILD

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 392ND 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion complies with the 

requirements of the rules of appellate procedure for voluntary dismissal of a civil case. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is 

dismissed. See id.

Opinion delivered February 27, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

FEBRUARY 27, 2015

NO. 12-15-00025-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

LESLIE SUE FLOYD AND BRADLEY DEAN CODY

AND IN THE INTEREST OF BILLY DEAN CODY, A CHILD

Appeal from the 392nd District Court 

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2014B-0692)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss 

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and 

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and 

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00782-CR

Aaron Meininger, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 08-1244-K368, THE HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Aaron Meininger has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

1

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 8, 2013

Do Not Publish

Appellant’s pro bono counsel has also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal. 1

In light of our dismissal of this appeal, we dismiss his motion as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000065195
<NAME>                        Mestek, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,831
<INVENTORY>                                     59,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,914
<PP&E>                                          90,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           479
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,481
<SALES>                                         73,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,688
<CGS>                                           53,585
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,666
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,832
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Re-Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,279  | 11,049 | 8,142  | 0      | 2,664  | 5,533  | 1,433  | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 82     | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-04]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Bristow, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Bristow, OK.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct rule published at 63 FR 12618 is effective 
0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 
(63 FR 12618). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Forth Worth, TX, on May 5, 1996.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12733 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-287-017]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

May 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1998, El Paso Natural Gas Company (El 
Paso) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheet to become effective 
May 1, 1998:

Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 30
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 31

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
implement six negotiated rate contracts pursuant to the Commission's 
Statement of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service 
Ratemaking for Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulation of Negotiated 
Transportation Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 
1996 at Docket Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12476 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Kuwait (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Kuwait (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7,068  | 20,213 | 9,981  | 10,308
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17,293 | 34,476 | 57,018 | 35,185 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-1274.

#### Gabelli et al. *v.*Securities and Exchange Commission.

C. A. 2d Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 968.] Motion of Former SEC Commissioners and Officials for leave to file brief as *amici curiae*out of time granted.
#### COM. v. WILLIAMS

1381 MDA 2014

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

04/06/2015

CP-67-CR-0001934-2013, CP-67-CR-0006449-2013 (York)

Affirmed
No. 12-6323.

#### Lindsay *v.*Boeing North America, Inc., et al.,

*ante,*p. 1020. Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1161 

To reaffirm state-based alcohol regulation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. CHAFFETZ (for himself, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, Mr. COBLE, Mr. CONYERS, 

Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. 

ROSS of Florida, and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reaffirm state-based alcohol regulation, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Alcohol 

5 Regulatory Effectiveness Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to recognize and reaffirm 

8 that alcohol is different from other consumer products and 

9 that it should continue to be regulated by the States. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1161 IH

1 SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR STATE ALCOHOL REGULATION. 

2 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act divesting intoxicating liq3 uors of their interstate character in certain cases’’, ap4 proved March 2, 1913 (27 U.S.C. 122 et seq.), commonly 

5 known as the ‘‘Webb-Kenyon Act’’, is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR STATE ALCOHOL REGULATION. 

8 ‘‘(a) DECLARATION OF POLICY.—It is the policy of 

9 Congress to recognize and reaffirm that alcohol is dif10 ferent from other consumer products and that it should 

11 continue to be regulated by the States. 

12 ‘‘(b) CONSTRUCTION OF CONGRESSIONAL SI13 LENCE.—Silence on the part of Congress shall not be con14 strued to impose any barrier under clause 3 of section 8 

15 of article I of the Constitution (commonly referred to as 

16 the ‘Commerce Clause’) to the regulation by a State or 

17 territory of alcoholic beverages. However, State or terri18 torial regulations may not intentionally or facially dis19 criminate against out-of-State or out-of-territory pro20 ducers of alcoholic beverages in favor of in-State or in21 territory producers unless the State or territory can dem22 onstrate that the challenged law advances a legitimate 

23 local purpose that cannot be adequately served by reason24 able nondiscriminatory alternatives.’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1161 IH

1 SEC. 4. AMENDMENT TO WILSON ACT. 

2 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to limit the effect of the 

3 regulations of commerce between the several States and 

4 with foreign countries in certain cases’’, approved August 

5 8, 1890 (27 U.S.C. 121), commonly known as the ‘‘Wilson 

6 Act’’, is amended by striking ‘‘to the same extent’’ and 

7 all that follows through ‘‘Territory,’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS