alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854

Focus Ready Draft 9/19/2013

ENGINEER: Arnold \ REC

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:CRSS (09/05/2013):

Consumer Use:OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854NINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 13-0854MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY:

Organization:

CALL TO:

Organization:

Date: 09/09/2013

Time: 2:30 PM

Phone:

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 13-0854

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY:

Organization:

CALL TO:Organization:

Date: 09/16/2013Time: 9:30 am

Phone:

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 13-0854
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                                    
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7493.

#### Lomax *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Colombia (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 550    | 0      | 912    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6415

DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, FCC Petersburg, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-582) Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: July 6, 2005 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Derek Marquis Fleming, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction, and the court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Fleming has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. In accordance with United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 995 (2003), we construe Fleming’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. In order- 3 - to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on colla teral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 ¶ 8 (2000). Fleming’s claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize Fleming to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of

Principal Executive Officer

of Chase Packaging Corporation Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K/A (the "Form 10-K/A") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, of Chase Packaging Corporation (the "Company"). I, Allen T. McInnes, the Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





| | (1) | The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K/A.



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K/A pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.







|Date: January 11, 2017 | By: | /s/ Allen T. McInnes                           | 
|---------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     | Allen T. McInnes                               | 
|                       |     | Chairman of the Board, President and Treasurer | 
|                       |     | (Principal Executive Officer)                  |
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1703

AN ACT

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway

National Park, and for other purposes.
103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1703

AN ACT

To expand the boundaries of the Piscataway National Park,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Piscataway National

5 Park Expansion Act of 1994’’.
2

S 1703 ES

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PARK.

2 (a) The boundaries of Piscataway Park in Maryland

3 are hereby revised to reflect the addition of approximately

4 163 acres of lands as generally depicted on the map enti5 tled ‘‘Proposed Boundary Map—Piscataway Park’’, num6 bered 838–80137, and dated November 17, 1993.

7 (b) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to ac8 quire lands and interests therein within the areas added

9 to the park pursuant to subsection (a) by donation, pur10 chase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.

11 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

12 There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as

13 are necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate June 16 (legislative day, June 7),

1994.

Attest:

Secretary.
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27584-27585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13274]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Group; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is 
announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public 
Advisory Group.

DATES: June 1-2, 1998, at 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Fourth floor conference room, 645 ``G'' Street, Anchorage, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 ``C'' 
Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, (907) 271-5011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Advisory Group was created by 
Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree 
entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on 
August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for 
the District of Alaska in settlement of United States of America v. 
State of Alaska, Civil Action

[[Page 27585]]

No. A91-081 CV. The agenda will include a review of project proposals 
submitted for the fiscal year 1999 Work Plan and a discussion of the 
restoration reserve fund.

    Dated: May 13, 1998.
Terence Martin,
Acting Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 98-13274 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
```
Environnsental 

ProtectionAgency 

}ohn R. Kasich, Governor 

iNary Tay4or, Lt. Governor 

Scott 1. 4VaEly, Director 

May 16, 2011 

Director David Mustine 

Ohio Department of Natural Resources 

2045 Morse Road, Building D 

Columbus. OH 43229-6693 

Re: Brine Disposal Pursuant to ORC Section 1509.22 

Dear Director Mustine: 

I am writing to memorialize our recent discussions regarding brine disposal from oil and 

gas operations so that our respective agencies and the regulated community will have 

clear direction moving forward concerning this issue. As we have discussed, ODNR 

has the regulatory authority over the disposal of brine generated from oillgas operations 

pursuant to Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Section 1509.22(C). There are no qualifiers as 

to the relative level of salinity in this definition or rules adopted by ODNR under this 

authority. 

Ohio Revised Code Section1509.22(C)(1) strictly limits the options for disposing of brine 

resulting from the production of oil or gas to the following: 

• injection into an underground formation; 

• road surPace application (excluding flow back, drilling and treatment fluids); 

• use in association with a method of enhanced recovery; or 

• by other methods approved by the ODNR, Chief of Mineral Resources 

Management for testing or implementing a new technology or method of 

disposal. 

Disposing directly into a surface water body, either directly or via a Publicly Owned 

Treatment Works (POTW), is not listed as one of these options. Moving forward, ODNR 

does not envision using its authority to allow for discharges to surface waters either 

directly or via a POTW. 
Brine Disposal 

Page 2 

As you know, the City of Warren is currently accepting low salinity brine from oil/gas 

operations (under 50,000 mg/1). Other POTWs have expressed a similar interest but 

those have not been approved. In order to implement this direction, it is my intention, 

as Director of Ohio EPA, to not reauthorize the City of Warren to take brine from oil/gas 

operafions when their permit expires. Further, we will also proceed to deny any other 

permit applications from POTWs that have expressed an interest in receiving this 

material. 

Sincerely, 

~ ~ 

17'~ 

Scott J. Nally 

Director 

cc: Tom Angelo, City of Warren 

Chuck Murphy, City of Steubenville 

Robert Disch, City of East Liverpool 

Robert Wright, City of East Liverpool 

Andrew Blocksom, Patriot Energy Partners
No. 12-5895.

#### Stewart *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-5216.

#### Holland *v.*Holt, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Jamaica (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              | 40.24 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13409]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Fee Schedules for the Issuance of Definitive Securities and 
TREASURY DIRECT Securities Accounts

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury is announcing two schedules of 
fees for marketable Treasury securities. The schedules are for the fees 
charged for the issuance of definitive securities and the fees for the 
annual maintenance of certain TREASURY DIRECT securities accounts.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 14, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maureen Parker, Director, Division of Securities Systems, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328, (304) 480-7761.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    On January 23, 1995, the Department of the Treasury established fee 
schedules for the issuance of definitive securities and the maintenance 
of certain TREASURY DIRECT securities accounts.
    The Treasury has decided that the fees for the issuance of 
definitive securities and the maintenance of certain TREASURY DIRECT 
Securities Accounts should remain unchanged from the amounts currently 
in effect.

Schedule of Fees for Definitive Securities

    The fee schedule for the issuance of a definitive security is as 
follows: a fee of $50 will be charged for each definitive security 
issued on a transfer, reissue, exchange or withdrawal from book-entry 
form, or as a result of the granting of relief on account of loss, 
theft, destruction, mutilation or defacement. Payment of the fee must 
accompany the request for the issues of securities in physical form. If 
a request results in the issuance of more than one security, the amount 
of the fee is arrived at by multiplying the number of pieces requested 
by $50. The fee announced above shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Schedule of Fees for TREASURY DIRECT Securities Accounts

    The fee schedule for TREASURY DIRECT securities accounts is as 
follows: each TREASURY DIRECT securities account holding Treasury 
bonds, notes and bills pursuant to 31 CFR part 357 that exceeds 
$100,000 in par amount as of a selected date in May of each year will 
be charged an annual maintenance fee in the amount of $25. This fee 
shall remain in effect until further notice. Each account holder will 
be individually billed.

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Van Zeck,
Commissioner of the Public Debt.
[FR Doc. 98-13409 Filed 5-15-98; 1:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-M