alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dustin	Olsen

Cobalt	Graphics

9584	W.	Jadewood	Dr

Boise,	ID	83709

520-834-4064

dustin.olsen@gmail.com

http://cobalt.graphics

January	13,	2016

Petition	for	Section	333	Exemption

I	hereby	formally	request	FAA	authorization	for	Dustin	Olsen - dba/	Cobalt	Graphics (hereafter	

“PETITIONER”)	to	operate	a	UAS	for	civil	(non-governmental)	purposes	other	than	for	recreation	or	

hobby.

PETITIONER	requests	to	be	exempted	from		14	CFR	§§	61.23(a)	and	(c),	61.101(e)(4)	and	(5),	

61.113(a),	61.315(a),	91.7(a),	91.119(c),	91.121,	91.151(a)(1),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	

91.409(a)(1)	and	(2),	and	91.417(a)	and	(b),	to	the	extent	necessary	to	allow	PETITIONER	to	

operate	a	UAS	to	perform	aerial	data	collection,	including	but	not	limited	to	aerial	imaging.		

PETITIONER	requests	this	exemption	for	its	use	of	UAS	both	within	and	without	the	United	States.		

PETITIONER	frequently	travels	abroad	for	photographic	endeavors	and	seeks	to	use	UAS	in	

accordance	with	all	laws	of	foreign	and	domestic	governmental	authorities.

PETITIONER	requests	this	permission	to	pursue	its	use	of	UAS	models	including	DJI	Phantom	3	

Advanced,	or	other	similar	commercially-available	and	widely-available	UAS	models.

PETITIONER	will	conduct	its	use	of	UAS	in	a	manner	which	will	minimize	risk	to	the	NAS,	other	

persons,	and	property.		The	following	procedures	will	be	followed:	(1)	UAS	will	be	given	a	pre-flight	

inspection	before	each	flight	to	examine	airworthiness,	(2)	UAS	will	not	be	materially	altered	from	

commercial	specifications	except	for	battery,	prop,	and	battery	alterations,	(3)	UAS	will	not	be	

flown	over	people,	(4)	UAS	will	always	be	flown	within	line	of	sight	to	operator(s)	pursuant	to	

Section	333(b)(1),	(5)	UAS	will	never	reach	altitudes	over	exceeding	those	allowed,	(6)	UAS	will	

never	reach	speeds	exceeding	50	mph,	(7)	operator	will	perform	a	preflight	visual	inspection	of	the	

NAS	to	determine	nearby	dangers	such	as	low-flying	manned	or	unmanned	aerial	vehicles,	power	

lines,	and	buildings,	(8)	UAS	will	be	checked	for	flight	stability,	proper	connection	to	remote	

control,	and	proper	performance	at	a	very	low	altitude	before	reaching	the	NAS,	and	(9)	nonparticipating	spectators	will	be	asked	to	stay	a	safe	distance	away	from	the	flight	path	of	the	UAS	

and	its	landing	location.		PETITIONER	is	an	experienced	UAS	operator	with	more	than	one	year	of	

experience.
This	petition	will	benefit	the	public	interest.	PETITIONER	works	with	local	City	and	County	

Government	Agencies,	their	Committees	and	Historical	Boards	to	Photograph	and	Video	Public	

Buildings	and	Ground	for	prosperity	and	the	enjoyment	of	future	generations.		PETITIONER	will	

provide	imagery	which	is	not	otherwise	possible	to	be	captured	without	the	use	of	a	UAV,	which	

will	assist	companies	to	which	the	images	may	be	sold,	will	enhance	the	public	understanding	of	

nature	photographed	by	the	UAS,	and	PETITIONER	will	be	able	to	provide	UAS	safety	information	

to	those	with	whom	he	or	she	comes	in	contact.

Please	grant	the	requested	exemption	under	Section	333.

Dustin	Olsen

dba/	Cobalt	Graphics
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27591-27592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importation of Controlled Substances Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1008 of the Controlled Substances Import and 
Export Act (21 U.S.C. 958(i)), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in Schedule I or II and prior to issuing a 
regulation under Section 1002(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Section 1301.34 of Title 21, Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR), notice is hereby given that on February 20, 
1998, Stepan Company, Natural Products Department, 100 W. Hunter 
Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made application to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration to be registered as an importer of coca 
leaves (9040) a basic class of controlled substance in Schedule II.
    The firm plans to import coca leaves to manufacture bulk controlled 
substances.
    Any manufacturer holding, or applying for, registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of this basic class of controlled substance may file 
written comments on or objections to the application described above 
and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such 
application in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.43 in such form as 
prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments, objections, or requests for a hearing may be 
addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 
Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United 
States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA 
Federal Register

[[Page 27592]]

Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than (30 days from 
publication).
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with and 
independent of the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34 (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice at 40 FR 43745-46 
(September 23, 1975), all applicants for registration to import a basic 
class of any controlled substance in Schedule I or II are and will 
continue to be required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 
Administration that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 
21 U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 CFR 1301.34 (a), (b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-13327 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 23-0648

__________________________________________________________________

MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and 

EARTHWORKS,

Plaintiffs & Appellants,

v.

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant & Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING MONTANA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 

HOTLINE, MONTANA NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION, AND 

MONTANA TRANSPARENCY PROJECT LEAVE TO APPEAR AS 

AMICI CURIAE 

_____________________________________________________________________

Pursuant to the unopposed motion for leave to file an amicus brief 

in the captioned matter filed by the Montana Freedom of Information 

Hotline, Montana Newspaper Association, and Montana Transparency 

Project, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and 

Amici are granted leave to file their amicus brief on Friday, April 19, 

2024.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 18 2024

04/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0648
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bal Bhullar, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lexaria Corp. for the year ended October 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lexaria Corp.



|                        |  |                                                                |  | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: January 18, 2010 |  |                                                               
|                        |  |                                                               
|                        |  |                                                               
|                        |  | Bal Bhullar                                                  | 
|                        |  | Bal Bhullar                                                   
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director               
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                        |  | Lexaria Corp.                                                 









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lexaria Corp. and will be retained by Lexaria Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AFS-16-8939-E

April 6, 2016

 Exemption No. 7772G

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11395

Mr. James F. Kregiel

SkillsUSA VICA

4001 SkillsUSA Way

Leesburg, VA 20177

Dear Mr. Kregiel:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7772, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 24, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of SkillsUSA VICA (Vocational International Clubs of America) (SkillsUSA) for an

extension of Exemption No. 7772, as amended. That exemption from § 147.21 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations relates to Aviation Maintenance Technician Schools whose 

students participate in the SkillsUSA Championships. The exemption allows authorized 

faculty members of those schools to determine if the student time dedicated to preparing for 

and participating in the SkillsUSA Championships (up to 60 hours per student per year) 

satisfies the requirements of § 147.21.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SkillsUSA.
AFS-16-8939-E

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7772, 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant SkillsUSA VICA petition to allow authorized faculty members of 

those schools whose students participate in the SkillsUSA Championships, to determine if the 

student time dedicated to preparing for and participating in the SkillsUSA Championships (up 

to 60 hours per student per year) satisfies the requirements of § 147.21, subject to the 

following conditions and limitations:

1. This exemption is valid only for substitution of the curriculum requirements of 

§ 147.21 for the purpose of student participation in the state and national SkillsUSA 

Championship.

2. Only authorized faculty members of schools whose students participate in the state 

and national SkillsUSA Championship may determine if student time dedicated to 

preparing for and participating in the SkillsUSA Championship, may be considered 

creditable to satisfy the requirement of § 147.21.

3. Creditable time is limited to a maximum of 60 hours per student per year.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7772, as amended, to May 31, 

2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Jacksonville, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 1   |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |        |        | 42,832 | 42,302 | 44,981 | 33,140
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 49,012 | 95,639 | 110,417 | 76,421 | 66,612 | 92,474 | 80,907 | 88,886 | 61,641 | 81,898
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 63,548 | 47,616 | 23,000  | 5,758  | 1,413  | 4,940  | 1,760  | 2,676  | 5,660  | 10,528
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24,975 | 26,569 | 25,467  | 22,100 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6998.

#### Wilson *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### Michael E. CUMMINGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4272

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Vivian T. Corvo, Judge.

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-10-00093-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JULIA JONES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 347th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Julia Jones, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the
2

appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate

will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed

the 25th day of March, 2010.
EXHIBIT 23.1






                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


The Board of Directors
Mobius Management Systems, Inc.

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
33-57695)  on Form S-8 of Mobius  Management  Systems,  Inc. of our report dated
July 28, 1998 relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Mobius  Management
Systems,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of June 30, 1998 and 1997,  and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period  ended June 30,  1998,  and the  related
schedule,  which report appears in the June 30, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K
of Mobius Management Systems, Inc.



KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Stamford, CT
September 25, 1998
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jordan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Corpus Christi, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jordan (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul   | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     | 3,449 |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 29, 2010 

s0922 

Order 

 

September 29, 2010 

141149 

LINDA S. MAHER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141149 

 COA: 287309 

 Saginaw CC: 05-056101-DM 

JAMES P. MAHER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals holding that the appreciation realized from the Smith Barney investment account 

during the marriage was the defendant’s separate property. The appreciation of an 

actively managed account during the parties’ marriage is marital property. Dart v Dart, 

460 Mich 573, 585 n 6 (1999), citing Hanaway v Hanaway, 208 Mich App 278 (1995), 

and Reeves v Reeves, 226 Mich App 490 (1997). The Court of Appeals held that neither 

plaintiff nor defendant actively handled or managed the account. However, because the 

trial court did not make a finding of fact as to whether the account was actively managed 

by either party, we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for full 

consideration of the issue, and for any further proceedings not inconsistent with this 

order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded that 

the remaining question should be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
No. 12-7526.

#### Riker *v.*Benedetti, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.