alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6409** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PATRICK JEROME BOYD, a/k/a LD , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. ( 3:10

- cr - 00072

- MOC

- 1 ; 3:14

- cv - 00199

- MOC )

Submitted : June 18, 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHED D , DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Patrick Jerome Boyd , Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman , William Michael Miller , Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte , North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpu blished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Patrick Jerome Boyd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a de batable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boyd has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the a ppeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 12-5140.

#### Montgomery *v.*California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2341

SERENA J. ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

INTOWN SUITES; BRIAN SMITH; TONI JONES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (2:11-cv-02213-SB)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Serena J. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Andreas Neal Satterfield, 

Jr., JACKSON LEWIS, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Serena J. Roberts appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing her civil action contesting the termination of her 

employment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Roberts v. Intown Suites, No. 2:11-cv-02213-SB 

(D.S.C. Oct. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26244-26245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2808]


Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Defense Trade 
Controls

AGENCY:  Department of State.

ACTION: 60-day notice of proposed information collection; DSP-85, 
application/license for permanent/temporary export or temporary import 
of classified defense articles and classified technical data.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Originating Office: The Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, 
Office of Defense Trade Controls.
    Title of Information Collection: Application/License for Permanent/
Temporary Export or Temporary Import of Classified Defense Articles and 
Classified Technical Data.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Form Number: DSP-85.
    Respondents: Applicants for Export/Import Licenses of Classified 
Defense Articles.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,500.
    Average Hours Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 2,250.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Comments regarding the collection listed in 
this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection and 
supporting

[[Page 26245]]

documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, Directives 
Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, 
(202) 647-0596.

    Dated: April 30, 1998.
Andrew J. Winter,
Deputy Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12497 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-M
No. 12-7277.

#### Collyer *v.*Farris et al.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|North Dakota Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|North Dakota Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17,133 | 16,163 | 14,691
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 14,067 | 13,990 | 12,773 | 12,462 | 11,483 | 12,008 | 15,998 | 13,697 | 12,218 | 3,950 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,017  | 13,759 | 3,514  | 4,100  | 4,563  | 4,710  | 3,974  | 5,194  | 4,014  | 3,388 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6,939  | 11,583 | 8,462  | 8,256  | 11,306 | 11,342 | 11,603 | 8,572  | 8,309  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed June 27, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00235-CV

CHARRIES MURRAY, Appellant

V.

WILLIE ROSE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19586

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lang-Miers 

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

In a letter dated April 21, 2014, the Court questioned jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Specifically, although the notice of appeal stated that appellant appealed a final order of the trial 

court dated February 19, 2014, the clerk’s record before the Court did not include an order 

bearing that date and also did not include any other appealable order. We requested the appellant 

to file a supplemental clerk’s record including the trial court’s order that was the subject of the 

appeal. To date appellant has not responded. Nevertheless, the Court must determine whether it 

has jurisdiction to proceed with this appeal, even if it is necessary to do so sua sponte. Bank of 

New York Mellon v. Guzman, 390 S.W.3d 593, 596 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.); Pierce v. 

Corbett, No. 05-97-00017-CV, 1999 WL 52964 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 5, 1999, no pet.) 

(mem. op.).
–2–

Generally, this Court has jurisdiction only over appeals from final judgments. See 

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Here there is no final judgment

from which the appellant has properly perfected an appeal in the clerk’s record. Accordingly, 

the appellate record fails to reflect the existence of jurisdiction. Because we find no basis for 

jurisdiction over this appeal, we DISMISS the appeal.

140235F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

CHARRIES MURRAY, Appellant

No. 05-14-00235-CV V.

WILLIE ROSE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19586.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Bridges and Francis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want 

of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellee WILLIE ROSE recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellant CHARRIES MURRAY.

Judgment entered this 27th day of June, 2014.
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**


**Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2006-HE2**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC


383
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10179


regabnotifications@bear.com





EMC
      Mortgage Corporation


909
      Hidden Ridge Drive


Irving,
      Texas 75038





Re:  The
      Pooling and Servicing agreement dated as of February 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor and Purchaser,
      EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Sponsor and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
      National Association, as Trustee.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.







Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee




/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Corpus Christi, TX  Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 20,787
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1,088  | 0      | 1,954  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, Appellant, v. Julie POOSER a/k/a Julie Ann Pooser, et al., Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-1820

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2017

Rehearing Denied September 29, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County. Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Michigan Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Synthetic Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Michigan Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Synthetic Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 540    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit      32.1**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mexco                Energy Corporation as of the dates and for periods presented as required                by such Report. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 13, 2007 | /s/                Nicholas C. Taylor  |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                   | Nicholas                C. Taylor      |
|                                   | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                   |
|                                   |                                   |
| Date:                November 13, 2007 | /s/                Tamala L. McComic   |
|                                   | Tamala                L. McComic       |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 10.13


 


Transfer Agreement for Greenhouse


 


Party A:
Harbin Hainan Kangda Cactus Hygienical Food Co., Ltd.


Party B:
Hongqi Jinxing Planting Base


 


Under the principle of
mutual support, mutual benefit and common development, Party A and Party B have
entered into the following agreement:


 


1.               Part A transfers its greenhouse and related
appurtenance within the Part B to part B in a lump. Total transferring accounts
for 250,000 RMB


 


2.               Facilities and equipments have a good
condition, doors and windows also have a good condition, the supply of water
and electricity is normal.


 


3.               After the Party B received greenhouse from
part A and confirm it have a good condition, Party B will take charge of all
the accidents such as damage and being stolen.


 


4.               Payment style: Within three days after the
subscription of this agreement, that is on Jan 9th,2006, party B
will pay 100,000 RMB to Party A, on March 9th2006, party B will pay
150,000 RMB to Party A.


 


This Contract is executed in
two counterparts, one for each party. The Contract will enter into effect upon
execution and seals of the both parties.


 


Party A:
Harbin Hainan Kangda Cactus Hygienical Food Co., Ltd.


 


Authorized
Representative (Sealed): Chengzhi Wang


 


Party B:
Hongqi Jinxing Planting Base


 


Authorized
Representative (Sealed): Yuen Si


 


January 6,
2006
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                       
|No chart available.                                                       
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Missouri Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Shale Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | NA     | NA    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6746.

#### Woodall *v.*Neotti, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.