alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 2, 2015

Mr. D. Andy Willis

Professional Engineer

ECSI, LLC

336 Town Mountain Road

Suite 4

Pikeville, KY 41501

Dear Mr. Willis :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 21, 45.23, 45.29, 61.133(a), 91.7(b), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109(a) , 91.119, 91.151(a), 91.203(a)

and (b), Subpart E (91.401

- 91.417) of Title 14, Code of Federal Reg ulations (14 CFR). It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your June 17, 2015, exemption request on behalf of ECSI, LLC filed in D ocket

No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2805 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition

does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the requ est would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requ ested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
No. 12-7780.

#### Stone *v.*United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-6781.

#### Graff *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Nieves, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 913]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered May 30, 2002, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*540The defendant challenges various questions posed by the prosecutor during her cross-examination of him and comments made during summation, and contends that the cumulative effect of the alleged prosecutorial misconduct constituted reversible error. The questions or comments the defendant now challenges are unpreserved for appellate review as they were not objected to at the trial *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Medina,*53 NY2d 951, 953 [1981]; *People v Sherwood,*279 AD2d 486 [2001]; *People v Portis,*141 AD2d 773 [1988]). In any event, a prosecutor “has broad latitude” in responding to the defense counsel’s summation or commenting on the trial testimony *(People v Cariola,*276 AD2d 800 [2000]). Here, the prosecutor’s remarks either were fair response to the defense counsel’s summation or fair comment on the trial testimony *(see People v Cariola, supra).*The prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant and comments during summation were not unduly prejudicial *(see People v Lowery,*281 AD2d 491 [2001]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
AMENDED INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT 

     This Amended Independent Contractor
Consultancy Agreement (the “Agreement”) made
and entered into as of January 30, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) by and between
Ross Stores, Inc. (“Company”) and Norman A. Ferber,
an individual (“Contractor”),
amends the Amended and Restated Independent Contractor Consultancy Agreement
entered into by the Company and Contractor effective as of January 6, 2010 (the
“Prior Agreement”) as follows: 

	1.		Paragraph 2.1 of
      the Prior Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
      following new Paragraph 2.1:
			 
			       2.1		Fees. Company will pay Contractor an annual fee for
      services rendered in the amount of $1,323,000, payable in equal monthly
      installments on or before the tenth day of each month during the Term (as
      defined herein).
		     		     	
	2.		The first two
      sentences of Paragraph 2.3 of the Prior Agreement are deleted in their
      entirety and replaced with the following new first two sentences of
      Paragraph 2.3:
	 
			2.3		Life
      Insurance. Company will pay
      directly to Contractor the amount necessary to cover the aggregate premium
      payments for the period from June 1, 2012 through May 31, 2016 (the
      “Remaining Insured
      Period”) for the existing life
      insurance policy on the life of Contractor (the policy issued for the
      benefit of the Norman A. Ferber and Rosine Ferber 2001 Insurance Trust or
      as otherwise designated by Contractor), with a death benefit in the amount
      of $2,000,000 (the “Policy”). Company
      acknowledges and agrees that it has paid all the applicable premiums on
      the Policy through June 1, 2012 and shall pay amounts each year during the
      Remaining Insured Period equal to that year’s premiums on the Policy
      through May 31, 2016.
	 
	3.		The first sentence
      of Paragraph 8.1 of the Prior Agreement is deleted in its entirety and
      replaced with the following new first sentence of Paragraph
  8.1:
	 
			8.1		Term. This Agreement is effective as of the Effective Date and will
    continue until May 31, 2016 (such date, the “Termination Date” and such period, the “Term”).
	 
	4.		Except as so
      amended, the Prior Agreement remains in full force and
  effect.









     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Agreement on the first date first above written. 

	
      Company: 

      ROSS STORES, INC.
		Contractor:

		 
 		
	By: 			
		George P. Orban	          	  Norman A. Ferber
		Chairman,
      Compensation		
		Committee
# L_2022304EN.01010501.xml

| 24.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 304/105 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 304/105

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 20/2010 of 12 January 2010 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Arzùa-Ulloa (PDO)]

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 8 of 13 January 2010
  )

On page 1, in the title of the Regulation, in recital (1) and on page 2 in the Annex to the Regulation:

for:

‘Arzùa-Ulloa’,

read:

‘Arzúa-Ulloa’.

---
To:      Perpetual Limited
         ABN 86 000 431 827
         of Level 12, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney, New South Wales
         (Issuing Trustee)

         Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
         ABN 42 000 001 007
         of Level 12, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney, New South Wales
         (Security Trustee)

         The Bank of New York
         of 101 Barclay Street, Floor 21 West, New York, New York,
         United States of America
         (Note Trustee)

From:    ME Portfolio Management Limited
         ABN 79 005 964 134
         of Level 23, 360 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria
         (Manager)



We refer to the Security Trust Deed - SMHL Global Fund No. [ ] dated [#] between
the Issuing Trustee, the Security Trustee, the Note Trustee and the Manager
(Security Trust Deed).

For the purposes of clause 6.3(a)(4) of the Security Trust Deed we hereby
nominate [*] as the date the Manager must not at any time cause the fixed
interest rate period for any Mortgage to end on or after.

A word or phrase (unless otherwise defined in this Nomination Notice) defined in
the Security Trust Deed has the same meaning as in the Security Trust Deed when
used in this Nomination Notice.



Dated: [#]

Signed for and on behalf of
ME Portfolio Management Limited
by two of its Authorised Signatories:


--------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
Authorised Signatory                   Authorised Signatory


--------------------------------       ----------------------------------------
Name (please print)                    Name (please print)
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
Exhibit 32.2
  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
  I, A. Bruce O’Connor, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the periodic report being filed herewith containing financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in said periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Middlesex Water Company for the period covered by said periodic report.
   /s/ A. Bruce O’ConnorA. Bruce O’ConnorChief Financial OfficerDate:   November 3, 2010
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Middlesex Water Company and will be retained by Middlesex Water Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T OL I VI A V AR GA S - VI L L A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 74024 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 880- 579 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r24, 2013 ** B e f o r e : R A W L I N S O N , N .R . S M I T H , a n dC H R I S T E N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . O l i vi aV a r ga s - V i l l a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of th e B o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , G rana do s- O segu era v. Mukasey , 546 F . 3d 1011, 

# FI LED SEP 27 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 74024 2 1 0 1 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) ( p e rc u r i a m ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g V a r g a s - V illa ’s m o tio n to re op en du e t o h erl ac k o f pri m a f ac i e e l i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef fr om re m ov albecause her fa i l ure t o d epartthe U ni t ed S t at es i n acc ordance w i th h ergrantof vo l un t ary de pa rtur e r e nde r e d he rs t a tut or i l yi ne l i gi bl e f orc anc e l l a t i on of

r e m ova l a nd a d ju s tm e n t o f

s ta tu s . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 c ( d ) ( 1 ) ; see a l so G ra n a do s-O seg u era , 546 F . 3d a t1015 ( “ [ W he r e the ] m ot i on t o r e ope n w a s f i l e d a f t e rthe pe r i od f

or vol unt a ryde pa rtur e ha d e l aps e d . . . the B I A w a s nots i m pl yc orr e c tt o de nythe m o tio n ; it w a s c o m p e lle dto d o s o b yth e o p e r a tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 c ( d ) ( 1 ) .” ) . O urc a s e l a w f

or e c l os e s V a r ga s - V i l l a ’ s c ont e nt i on tha the rc l a i m of i ne f f e c t i ve a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l s u rm o u n ts th e v o lu n taryd e p a rtu r e b a r . Se e id. a t1016 (“ E ven ass um i ng . . . i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l , the st atut ory bar s on rel i ef w ou l d n on ethel es s c on trol . . . . ”) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, the Corporate Trustee ofMesabi Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Mesabi Trust.

 

 
| /s/ Rodney  Gaughan                                             |   | September 15,  2003 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| Rodney  Gaughan*                                                |
| Assistant  Vice President  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |

 

----

* There are no principalexecutive officers or principal financial officers of the registrant.

 

----
Calendar No. 290

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1574

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal HeritNfor other purposes. age Trail Route in the State of New Jersey, and OVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 290

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1574

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail Route in the

State of New Jersey, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 20 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. BRADLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported by Mr. JOHNSTON, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the Coastal Heritage Trail

Route in the State of New Jersey; and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 6 of Public Law 100–515 (16 U.S.C. 1244

4 note) is amended by striking ‘‘$250,000’’ and inserting

5 in lieu thereof, ‘‘$2,500,000’’.
No. 12-6640.

#### Mizukami *v.*Edwards et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7069.

#### Rayner *v.*Mills, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1316

To suspend temporarily the duty on tefluthrin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on tefluthrin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEFLUTHRIN.

4 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar5 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

6 in numerical sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 (2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-

methylphenyl)-methyl-

(1α3α)-(Z)-(±)-3-(2-chloro3,3,3-trifluoro-1-propenyl)-

2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate (CAS No.

79538-32-2) (provided for

in subheading 2916.20.00) Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•S 1316 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### Gorham v. Gorham

08/02/2016

195 MAL (2016)

Denied

Pa.Super., 141 A.3d 589
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From France  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From France  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar   | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              |       |     | 2,768 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2019                                                                                                                              | 2,651 |     |       |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# L_2010118EN.01004301.xml

| 12.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 118/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 118/43

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 412/2010

of 11 May 2010

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 12 May 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 May 2010.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 65,5 |
| TN | 120,6 |
| TR | 73,2 |
| ZZ | 86,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | EG | 140,2 |
| MA | 41,0 |
| MK | 54,8 |
| TR | 118,3 |
| ZZ | 88,6 |
| 0709 90 70 | TR | 102,7 |
| ZZ | 102,7 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 48,5 |
| IL | 62,7 |
| MA | 53,2 |
| TN | 46,4 |
| TR | 51,4 |
| US | 67,7 |
| ZZ | 55,0 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 68,2 |
| ZA | 78,6 |
| ZZ | 73,4 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 87,0 |
| BR | 76,9 |
| CA | 119,3 |
| CL | 80,6 |
| CN | 78,9 |
| CR | 59,1 |
| MK | 22,1 |
| NZ | 113,0 |
| US | 126,3 |
| UY | 72,1 |
| ZA | 86,3 |
| ZZ | 83,8 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

65,5

TN

120,6

TR

73,2

ZZ

86,4

0707 00 05

EG

140,2

MA

41,0

MK

54,8

TR

118,3

ZZ

88,6

0709 90 70

TR

102,7

ZZ

102,7

0805 10 20

EG

48,5

IL

62,7

MA

53,2

TN

46,4

TR

51,4

US

67,7

ZZ

55,0

0805 50 10

TR

68,2

ZA

78,6

ZZ

73,4

0808 10 80

AR

87,0

BR

76,9

CA

119,3

CL

80,6

CN

78,9

CR

59,1

MK

22,1

NZ

113,0

US

126,3

UY

72,1

ZA

86,3

ZZ

83,8

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---