alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MINERAL MOUNTAIN MINING & MILLING COMPANY

Form 10-QSB

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,  AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Donald L. Hess, the Secretary-Treasurer of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company, state that:



To  the  best of my knowledge, based upon a review of this quarterly report  on Form 10 QSB for the three-month period ended September 30, 2002, and except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



*   This second quarter report  of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company on Form 10 QSB for  the  three month period ended September 30, 2002 fully  complies  with  the requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



*  Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company falls within the provisions of Rule 13a-13 (c) (2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as an exploration stage mining company not in the production stage and claims exemption thereunder from the requirement to file financial information for the three month period ended September 30, 2002.







By: /S/ Donald L. Hess, Secretary-Treasurer

Of Mineral Mountain Mining & Milling Company







Date: October 31, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 28000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Keweenaw National Historical Park Advisory Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Keweenaw 
National Historical Park Advisory Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES: June 9, 1998; 8:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Keweenaw National Historical Park Headquarters, 100 Red 
Jacket Road (2nd floor), Calumet, Michigan 49913-0471.
    The Chairman's welcome; minutes of the previous meeting; update on 
the general management plan; update on park activities; old business; 
new business; next meeting date; adjournment. This meeting is open to 
the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Keweenaw National 
Historical Park, Frank C. Fiala, PO Box 471, Calumet, Michigan 49913-
0471, 906-337-3168.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Keweenaw National Historical Park was 
established by Public Law 102-543 on October 27, 1992.

    Dated: May 4, 1998.
William W. Schenk,
Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-13514 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Statement of the Air and Radiation Management Administration 

Department of the Environment 

for the Public Hearing 

Relating to a Proposed Amendment to 

COMAR 26.11.26.05 Transportation Conformity 

held on April 30, 2008 

Baltimore, MD 

My name is Carl York. I am the Special Projects Manager of Air Quality Planning 

Program of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, Maryland Department of 

Environment (MDE). 

This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102 

and Sections 2-301 et. seq. of the Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. It is also 

being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Act under the State 

Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101. 

Notice of this hearing appeared in the: 

Maryland Register on March 28, 2008; 

MDE's website from March 18, 2008 to April 30, 2008; 

Baltimore Sun on March 28, 2008; 

Saint Mary's Enterprise on March 28, 2008; 

Cumberland Times-News on March 28, 2008; 

Frederick News-Post on March 28, 2008; 

Salisbury Daily Times on March 28, 2008; and the 

Washington Post on March 27, 2008. 

Copies of these notices were submitted for the record. 

Copies of this proposed action and supporting documents were made available for review 

by the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies 

were made also available for public inspection at the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health 

departments or local air quality control offices. 

 The purpose of today's hearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment on a 

proposed amendment to COMAR 26.11.26.05 Transportation Conformity. 

Summary 

The purpose of this amendment is to remove a subsection of a recently adopted 

transportation conformity regulation. The subsection being removed has been deemed not 

necessary by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EPA requested that Maryland 

make this change to the regulation. 

1 
The removal of this subsection of the regulation will not affect the agencies responsible 

for transportation conformity nor will it have an economic impact. It simply removes language 

that is not relevant to the regulation. 

Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

This amendment will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a 

revision to Maryland’s State Implementation Plan. 

Consideration of Comments 

 

The Department will consider all comments before making a decision to adopt this 

amendment. 

L:\AQPlanning and Monitoring\Regulation Development Division\Hearing Materials\Hearing Statements\Hearing 

Stmt - 2008 Conformity Amendment.doc 

2
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Other States Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 0       | 62,764  | 66,869  | 69,289  | 197,614 | 208,942 | 221,038 | 220,892
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 216,717 | 213,309 | 202,744 | 188,862 | 192,833 | 175,283 | 166,457 | 158,222 | 150,600 | 141,860
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 133,754 | 122,946 | 113,199 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6757.

#### Maxwell *v.*Capozza, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Pittsburgh, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Review of Conference Grants--R13s (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Date: June 3, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, East 
Campus, Building 4401, Room 3446, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-24, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Grant 
applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
this meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant/contract review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-13532 Filed 5-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1567

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor Management

Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional remedies in certain unfair

labor practice cases, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor

Management Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional

remedies in certain unfair labor practice cases, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations Rem5 edies Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. BOARD REMEDIES.

7 Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act

8 (29 U.S.C. 160(c)) is amended by inserting after the
2

S 1567 IS

1 fourth sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘If the Board

2 finds that an employee was discharged in violation of this

3 Act, the Board in such order shall (1) award back pay

4 in an amount equal to three times the employee’s wage

5 rate at the time of the unfair labor practice and (2) notify

6 such employee of the employee’s right to sue for punitive

7 damages and damages with respect to a wrongful dis8 charge under section 303 of the Labor Management Rela9 tions Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), as amended by the Labor

10 Relations Remedies Act of 1993.’’.

11 SEC. 3. COURT REMEDIES.

12 Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act,

13 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), is amended by adding at the end

14 the following new subsections:

15 ‘‘(c) It shall be unlawful, for purposes of this section,

16 for an employer to discharge an employee for exercising

17 rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act

18 (29 U.S.C. 158).

19 ‘‘(d) An employee whose discharge is determined by

20 the National Labor Relations Board under section 10(c)

21 to be a violation of this Act may sue therefore in any dis22 trict court of the United States without respect to the

23 amount in controversy, or in any other court having juris24 diction over the parties to recover compensatory and puni-
3

S 1567 IS

1 tive damages in addition to the back pay ordered by the

2 Board.

3 ‘‘(e) Nothing contained in section 8 or section 10 of

4 the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158), or in

5 this section shall limit the rights and remedies under any

6 State or Federal law or before any court or other tribunal

7 of an employee discharged by an employer.’’.

Æ
No. 12-6855.

#### Bergrin *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001026601
<NAME> CHEMFIRST INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996              JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          68,385                   44,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,049                   67,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                       404                      305
<INVENTORY>                                     70,021                   68,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,837                  196,192
<PP&E>                                         293,627                  250,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,545                  112,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 423,090                  414,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,357                   69,183
<BONDS>                                          2,122                   82,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                        0
<COMMON>                                        20,673                   20,585
<OTHER-SE>                                     287,813                  206,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   423,090                  414,335
<SALES>                                        383,637                  352,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                        0
<CGS>                                          299,340                  271,936
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  299,340                  271,936
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,996                    6,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,281                      266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,735                    9,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,919)                  16,668
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,632)                   8,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,441)                   9,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                 260,301                   47,943
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                        0
<CHANGES>                                            0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   249,860                   57,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.12                     2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.12                     2.75


</TABLE>
Air Quality Program Sacaton, 

### AZ. 85247

To: District 

# 5 We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming Community meeting on 

# 6-14 

# -=. The air quality program will make a presentationon the following

The presentationwill be given 

### by 

## r)av\ . Please call Janet Travis at (520) 562-2234 

### ext. 286 to confirm placement on the agenda. 

### Thank-you 

# I 

# I

# 1 TRAWMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT

# 1
I I TIME : 06/01/2005 16:28 NAME : DEPT DEB FAX : 5205622245 TEL : 5205622234 DATE, TIME FAX NO. /NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 06/01 16:28 5623435 00:00: 19 01 OK STWDARD ECM



### Air Quality Progmtn Sacaton, 

### AZ. 

### 85247
Date: 

## b 4 -05 To: bistrict3/ 

### We would 

### like to request placement on theagenda 

### for

### the upcoming Community meeting 

### on 

# 6 -14 

## -Ot;. The air 

### quality program will 

### makea presentation on 

### the following



### The presentationwill 

### be given 

### by 

# bdu\ 'b(~cc~-

### ,
No. 12-7676.

#### Montgomery *v.*McQuiggin, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7121

CURTIS RAY BROOKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:16-cv-00976-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Ray Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Ray Brooks seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive and unauthorized his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Brooks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports by Vessel to Chile (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |         |        |        |        | 0      | 29,405 | 25,746 | 41,186 | 90,357
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 80,615 | 121,881 | 30,131 | 31,217 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Freeport, TX Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to China (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 68,266 | 73,626 | 3,818  | 44,282 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024