[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 20

- 11068 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:19

- cv - 02368

- VMC Bkcy. No. 8:17

- bk

- 03597

- MGW

In re: NI L HAN FINANCIAL, LLC, Debtor.

__________________________________________________________________ CHITTRANJAN THAKKAR, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus GREENSPOON MARDER, P.A. , Defendant

- Appellee.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

___________ _____________ ( January 4, 2021 ) USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 1 of 32 Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge , JORDAN and GRANT , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Chittranjan Thakkar, a member of the debtor , Nihan Financial, LLC., appeals pro se the dismiss al of his appeal from an order by the bankruptcy court
approv ing a claim for attorneys’ fees . Thakkar argues that the district court erred in determining that he lacked standing to appeal the dismissal because he was a “person aggrieved” as he owned equity in the debtor entity. We affirm. “To have standing, a plaintiff must show: (1) he has suffered an injury in fact that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) the injury is fairly traceable to conduct of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, not just merely speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.” Kelly v. Harris , 331 F.3d 817, 819

- 20 (11th Cir. 2003). The injury requirement “serves to distinguish a person with a direct stake in the outcome of a litig ation

— even though small

— from a person with a mere interest in the problem.” Arcia v. Fla. Sec’y of State , 772 F.3d 1335, 1340 (11th Cir. 2014). To determine whether a person has standing to appeal an order of a bankruptcy court, we apply the “person aggrie ved” standard. Atkinson v. Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. (In re Ernie Haire Ford, Inc.) , 764 F.3d 1321, 1325 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied , 136 S. Ct. 104 (2015 ). Under th at standard, a person has standing to a ppeal only when he is “directly, adversely, and pecu niarily affect[ed] by a bankruptcy

USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 2 of 33 court’s order.” Id. ; see also Fisher Island Ltd. v. Solby+Westbrae Partners (In re Fisher Island Investments, Inc.) , 778 F.3d 1172, 1195

- 96 (11th Cir. 2015). A party is not “aggrieved” when the bankruptcy court’s order causes only indirect harm to the party’s asserted interest. See In re Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. , 764 F.3d at 1326 (holding that former creditor was not a “person aggrieved” because he was merely an adversar y defendant with an interest in avoiding liability to the estate). The district court did not err when it dismissed Thakkar’s appeal . As we recently decided in a related appeal, Thakkar v. Good Gateway, LLC , no. 19

- 14868 (11th Cir. Dec. 9, 2020), Thakkar lacks standing to appeal an order of the bankruptcy court that only indirectly affect s his pecuniary interest in the debtor

. See , e.g., In re AFY, Inc. , 733 F.3d 791, 793 (8th Cir. 2013) (holding that shareholders of debtor were not persons aggrieved enti tled to appeal denials of objections to claims). As was true for the settlement agreement that Thakkar sought to challenge in his earlier appeal, the approval of the claim for attorneys’ fees only indirectly affected his pecuniary interests , if at all. And because Thakkar lacks standing to appeal, we need not address his other arguments. AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 20-11068 Date Filed: 01/04/2021 Page: 3 of 3