alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC §1350,

as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F TTI Team Telecom International Ltd. (the Company) for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Israel (Eli) Ofer, certify, pursuant to 18 USC §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 23, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Israel (Eli) Ofer  
|                    |  |  |  | Israel (Eli) Ofer      
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.2


AGREEMENT


AGREEMENT (“Agreement”),
dated as of May 16, 2006, by and between New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation (“Company”), and Dean Bernstein (“Executive”).


RECITALS


A.    Executive
is currently Executive Vice President, Acquisitions/Dispositions of the
Company.


B.     The
Company and Executive entered into an employment agreement dated as of September 25,
1998 (as amended and extended, the “Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the
terms of the Employment Agreement, the term of the “Employment Period” under
the Employment Agreement expires on December 31, 2006.


C.     The
Company desires to extend the “Employment Period” under the Employment
Agreement for a term of two (2) years (i.e., from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2008) and otherwise on the same terms and conditions
as the Employment Agreement (the “Bernstein Employment Agreement Extension”).


D.     The
Executive Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company by Unanimous Written Consent dated as of May 5 , 2006
authorized and approved the Bernstein Employment Agreement Extension.


AGREEMENT


IN CONSIDERATION
of the premises and the mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereby
agree to modify the terms of the Employment Agreement as follows:


1.                                       The Employment Period under the
Employment Agreement shall be extended for a term of two (2) years and
accordingly shall expire on December 31, 2008, subject to the extension
provisions contained in Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement.


2.                                           Except as herein provided, all of the
terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first
above written.


	
  

  	
   

  	
  NEW PLAN EXCEL REALTY TRUST, INC., a

  Maryland corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  DEAN BERNSTEIN

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Dean Bernstein
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              | 13.26 |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to South Korea (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Elba Island, GA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to South Korea (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3,712  | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Solomon ROBERTS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0421

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 11, 2017

L.T. NO.: 78-5774

Denied.
Exhibit 99.02


     I, Venerando J. Indelicato, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DRYCLEAN USA,
Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

Date:  November 14, 2002

/s/ Venerando J. Indelicato
--------------------------------
Venerando J. Indelicato,
Treasurer and Chief Financial
   Officer
#### Eboni B., Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Skylah N., Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[49 NYS3d 126]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered January 25, 2016, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously modified, on *487the law and in the exercise of discretion, to deny defendant’s motion insofar as it sought dismissal of the claim brought on the infant plaintiff’s behalf, and grant plaintiff’s cross motion, to the extent that the notice of claim is deemed served on behalf of the infant plaintiff, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Although plaintiff did not present a reasonable excuse for the delay in serving a notice of claim *(see e.g. Colarossi v City of New York,*118 AD3d 612, 612 [1st Dept 2014]), and although defendant did not have actual knowledge of the facts constituting the claim within the statutory period or a reasonable time thereafter, leave to serve a late notice of claim on behalf of the infant plaintiff is warranted based on other relevant factors *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]).

The infant plaintiff was approximately nine months old at the time that he allegedly sustained injuries as a result of an exposed hot water pipe in his family’s apartment, in a building owned and operated by defendant. This infancy weighs in favor of granting leave to serve a late notice of claim, regardless of the lack of a nexus between the delay and infancy *(see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr.,*6 NY3d 531, 538 [2006]). In addition, defendant failed to address plaintiff’s showing that defendant would not be substantially prejudiced by the 10-month delay in seeking leave since the condition of the exposed pipes remained unchanged from the time of the accident *(Matter of Richardson v New York City Hous. Auth.,*136 AD3d 484, 485 [1st Dept 2016], *lv denied*28 NY3d 905 [2016]). Given these factors, which the motion court failed to address, and given the remedial nature of the statute, the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in dismissing the infant plaintiff’s claim *(see Matter of Thomas v City of New York,*118 AD3d 537, 537-538 [1st Dept 2014]).

To the extent that the complaint states a derivative claim on behalf of the infant plaintiff’s mother, she is not entitled to leave to serve a late notice of claim on her behalf *(see Matter of Bensen v Town of Islip,*99 AD2d 755, 756 [2d Dept 1984], *appeal dismissed*62 NY2d 798 [1984]).

Plaintiff’s noncompliance with the pleading requirements of Public Housing Law § 157 (1) is a nonjurisdictional defect that may be remedied by amendment *(see*CPLR 3025 [b]; *Snyder v Board of Educ. of Ramapo Cent. School Dist. No. 2, Town of Ramapo, Rockland County,*42 AD2d 912 [2d Dept 1973]).

Concur — Friedman, J.P., Andrias, Gische and Webber, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Boulder Capital Opportunities II, Inc.
(the Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Delaney, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          or the Company.


Dated: November 30, 2004
                                    By: /s/ Michael J. Delaney
                                        -----------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010067EN.01000201.xml

| 18.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5700 — Lloyds TSB Development Capital/PCH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 67/02

On 12 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5700. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5700. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 12,407 | 17,200
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 17,516 | 17,404 | 17,892 | 17,862 | 16,385 | 15,639 | 18,179 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 20,226 | 22,010 | 23,416 | 24,354 | 23,885 | 24,487 | 24,796 | 24,883 | 25,001 | 24,872
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24,973 | 24,200 | 23,130 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6150
JOHNNY DEAN POWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSTEPHEN HARRIS; STATE OF MARYLAND PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; STATE OF MARYLAND PROSECUTORS OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA95-3377-DKC) Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 10, 1996 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Dean Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Powell v. Harris , No. CA-95-3377-DKC (D. Md. Dec.21, 1995). To the extent that Appellant's claim against the Maryland Public Defender's Office was intended as a damage action rather than a habeas action, we note that public defenders are not considered state actors for § 1983 purposes; thus, no award of damages would have been proper. Polk County v. Dodson , 454 U.S. 312 (1981). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| NovaStar Financial, Inc., a Maryland      corporation, and its subsidiaries |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   | n     | NovaStar Certificates Financing Corporation, a Delaware      corporation |
|                                                                        | n | NFI Holding Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and its      subsidiaries |
|                                                                        |  | n     | NovaStar Asset Management Company, a Delaware  corporation |
|                                                                        |  | n | NovaStar Credit Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation |
|                                                                        |  | n | NovaStar Real Estate Holdings, Inc. , a Delaware    corporation |
|                                                                        |  | n | NovaStar Home Mortgage, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its      subsidiary |
|                                                                        |  |  | n     | NovaStar Home Mortgage of South Carolina, Inc. , a Delaware      corporation |
|                                                                        |  | n | NovaStar Mortgage, Inc., a Virginia corporation, and its      subsidiaries |
|                                                                        |  |  | n | NovaStar Mortgage Funding Corporation, a Delaware    corporation |
|                                                                        |  |  | n | NovaStar REMIC Financing Corporation, a Delaware    corporation |
|                                                                        |  |  | n | NovaStar Certificates Financing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
|                                                                        |  | n | NovaStar CDO Holdings, Inc. , a Delaware corporation, and its      subsidiaries |
|                                                                        |  |  | n | NovaStar ABS CDO I, Inc. , a Delaware corporation |
|                                                                        |  |  | n | NovaStar ABS CDO I, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation |
|                                                                        | n | NovaStar Mortgage Financing Corporation, a Delaware      corporation |
|                                                                        | n | Streetlinks National Appraisal Services, LLC, an Indiana limited      liability company |
|                                                                        | n | Tracecorp Settlement Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |
|                                                                        | n | Advent Financial Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability      company |

----
EXHIBIT 31.2 

I, Stephen M. Shea, Chief FinancialOfficer of Mestek, Inc., certify that: 

    1.                 I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended          September 30, 2005, of Mestek, Inc. (the “registrant”); 

    2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

    3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and          for, the periods presented in this report; 

    4.                 The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: