alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                             
|Ohio Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                             
|Ohio Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 14.41  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10.28  | 10.32  | 8.75   | 9.20   | 10.15  | 9.24   | 9.00   | 9.79   | 9.21   | 9.25  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8.93   | 11.12  | 13.87  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Samuel D. Rosen, Appellant, v Evelyn Hanrahan, Defendant, and Susan Hanrahan et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 818]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered on or about December 9, 2002, which, to the extent appealable, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion and cross motion to the extent of dismissing the complaint as against defendants Ostrow and Brown and dismissing plaintiffs second and third causes as against the Hanrahan defendants, severing plaintiffs remaining causes and transferring the action to Suffolk County, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 11, 2003, which, upon the partial grant of reargument, granted plaintiffs previously denied motion to disqualify Peter Galasso, Esq. and his law firm from representing either of the Hanrahan defendants, unanimously dismissed, without costs, since no appeal lies from that portion of the order denying reargument and plaintiff is not aggrieved from that portion of the order granting his disqualification motion.

*353Plaintiff’s second and third causes of action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, respectively, were properly dismissed since, inter alia, the allegedly wrongfully commenced proceeding against plaintiff upon which his malicious prosecution claims are premised was not terminated in his favor and plaintiff cannot demonstrate that the complained-of proceeding was initiated without probable cause *(see Belsky v Lowenthal,*62 AD2d 319, 321 [1978], *affd*47 NY2d 820 [1979]), and since plaintiff is demonstrably unable to show that process was utilized against him, without excuse or justification, to obtain a collateral objective *(see Curiano v Suozzi,*63 NY2d 113, 116 [1984]).

Inasmuch as the principal issues raised in connection with plaintiff’s remaining causes, for breach of contract, unjust enrichment and conversion, will be adjudicated in the context of the matrimonial action between plaintiff and Susan Hanrahan Rosen and other litigation pending in Suffolk County, where the disputed property and certain material police witnesses are situated *(see Katz v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.,*116 AD2d 506, 508 [1986]), we perceive no basis to disturb the motion court’s determination to change the action’s venue to Suffolk County *(see Blasch v Chrysler Motors Corp.,*84 AD2d 894, 895 [1981]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

231) IV-E-105 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:59 PM Sheet 231 of 242 
P.2 

mf <* 

IV-E-lcss 

a 

$ .Tm \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

JUMSffiSS 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Meeting with AAMA Regarding Onboard Refueling 

Test Procedures - III 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

^^rYUm^m O fOmrUi^Criy-^rjrJ- ^ 

FROM: Glenn W. Passavant, Chief 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

TO: Public Docket A-87-11 

On July 15, 1993 members of the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) staff met with representatives of the American 

Automobile Manufacturers Association (AAMA) to discuss potential 

changes to the refueling emission test procedures as laid out in 

EPA's recently published Federal Register notice on this issue (May 

27, 1993, 58 FR 30731) . The meeting which was held at the EPA lab 

in Ann Arbor was in follow-up to the meeting of July 8, 1993 on the 

same topic. An attendees list is attached. 

A copy of the material presented by AAMA at the meeting is 

attached. Discussions focused on questions from the previous 

meeting on potential changes in the test procedure as they relate 

to the effects on canister size and the fillneck seal approach 

used. AAMA agreed to provide further data on several points and to 

follow-up with EPA in the near future. 

Attachments 

2 0 1993 
P.3 

ATTENDEES 

EPA\AAMA MEETING 

July 15, 1993 

NAME AFFILIATION 

Charles Gray 

Chet France 

Glenn Passavant 

Joanne Goldhand 

Don Kopinski 

Marcel Halberstadt 

Sam Leonard 

Jim Posek 

Kelly Brown 

Mike Schware 

Reg Modiin 

Fred Maloney 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

AAMA 

GM 

GM 

Ford 

Ford 

Chrysler 

Chrysler 
P.4 

AAMA's ORVR Test Procedure Position 

(Passenger Cars) 

7/15/93 

Performance Based Canister Loading for ORVR and Evap 

(5 diurnal days) 

Canister purge drive includes FTP, LA4, 2 NYCC, LA4 at 75 to 80 

deg. F. (essentially EPA's Option B1) 

Refueling test includes 

after canister purge drive 

Drain and fill to 10% 

Option A 

o r 

Option B 

6-24 hour soak at 90 deg. F. 

4-10 gal/min fill with 72 deg. F. 9 psi test fuel 

to > 95% capacity 

6-24 hour soak at 80 deg. F. 

4-10 gal/min fill with 67 deg. F. 9 psi test fuel 

to > 95%) capacity 

. Standard set at 0.20 g/gal 

Draft
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Compressed Portal, ND Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Compressed Portal, ND Natural Gas Imports from Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2018                                                                                                                              |     |     | 1   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     | 0   |     |     |     |     |    
|2022                                                                                                                              |     |     | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AURELIO MARTINEZ CLEMENTE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-73057 

Agency No. A200-630-844

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Aurelio Martinez Clemente, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying cancellation of removal. We 

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 27 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-73057 

2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that Martinez Clemente

failed to establish ten years of continuous physical presence for cancellation of 

removal, where the record includes a signed Form I-826 indicating that he accepted 

administrative voluntary departure in lieu of removal proceedings in 2011. See 8 

U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir. 

2006) (alien’s acceptance of administrative voluntary departure interrupts the 

accrual of continuous physical presence); Serrano Gutierrez v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 

1114, 1117-18 (9th Cir. 2008) (requiring some evidence that alien was informed of 

and accepted the terms of the voluntary departure agreement). Even assuming 

Martinez Clemente’s testimony to be credible, see Krotova v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 

1080, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005) (“When the BIA’s decision is silent on the issue of 

credibility, despite an IJ’s explicit adverse credibility finding, we may presume that 

the BIA found the petitioner to be credible.”), his testimony does not compel a 

contrary conclusion, cf. Ibarra-Flores, 439 F.3d 614 at 619-20 (insufficient 

evidence that alien knowingly and voluntarily accepted voluntary departure where 

record did not contain the voluntary departure form and alien’s testimony 

suggested that he accepted return due to misrepresentations by immigration 

authorities). 

The BIA sufficiently explained its decision. See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at
3 17-73057 

990-91 (holding the BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently 

announced its decision).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Gordon, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 331]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered July 20, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree, scheme to defraud in the first degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (10 counts), and filing a false tax return (seven counts), and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 3 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly excused a prospective juror who revealed that he was subject to a statutory disqualification *(see*CPL 270.20 [1] [c]; *People v Branch,*46 NY2d 645, 650 [1979]). Further inquiry by the court or counsel would have served no useful purpose *(see People v Laboy,*251 AD2d 95 [1998], *lv denied 92*NY2d 950 [1998]).

Since defendant’s exception to the court’s charge was insufficient to alert the court to his present claim, that claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were to review this claim, we would find that the court, at defendant’s request, correctly instructed the jury on the general provision covering the effect on criminal liability of a defendant’s alleged mistake of law (Penal Law § 15.20 [2]). We would further find that the jury instruction that defendant now argues should have been delivered would have been incompatible with the cited Penal Law provision, as well as with the specific mistake of law provision found in Tax Law § 1804 (c).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1645

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel VENUS.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 8 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Mr. MACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

VENUS.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel VENUS, United States official number

9 547419.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group A (Microwave Devices) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday, July 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Cox, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency (ARPA) and the Military Departments in 
planning and managing an effective and economical research and 
development program in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group A meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
microwave device area includes programs on developments and research 
related to microwave tubes, solid state microwave devices, electronic 
warfare devices, millimeter wave devices, and passive devices. The 
review will include details of classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended, 
(5 U.S.C. App. 10(d) (1994), it has been determined that this Advisory 
Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1)(1994), and 
that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: May 14, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-13376 Filed 5-19-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kyle Peterson v. Julia Bagnall

Appellate case number: 01-17-00208-CV

Trial court case number: 2004-51718

Trial court: 246th District Court of Harris County

On April 12, 2017, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the court reporter had 

informed the Court that appellants had not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the reporter’s fee 

for preparing the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(b). The Clerk further notified appellants that 

unless, on or before May 12, 2017, they filed proof that they had paid, or had made arrangements 

to pay, the reporter’s fee for preparing the record, the Court may consider and decide those issues 

or points that do not require a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c) (stating that, if 

clerk’s record has been filed, appellate court may consider and decide those issues or points that 

do not require a reporter’s record). Appellant did not respond. The clerk’s record was filed on 

April 10, 2017. 

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require 

a reporter’s record for a decision. See id. Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than 30 days 

after the date of this order. 

Appellees’ brief will be due within 30 days after appellants’ brief has been filed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 6, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board Meeting

    The 1998 Summer Study General Board Meeting in support of the HQ 
USAF Scientific Advisory Board will meet at the Arnold and Mabel 
Beckman Center, National Academies of Engineering & Sciences, Irvine, 
CA on June 15-26, 1998 from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to gather information and receive 
briefings for the 1998 Summer Study topic on Going to Space.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with Section 
552b of Title 5, United States Code, specifically subparagraphs (1) and 
(4) thereof.
    For further information, contact the HQ USAF Scientific Advisory 
Board Secretariat at (703) 697-8404.
Barbara A. Carmichael,
Alternate Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12896 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3910-01-P
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Newark, NJ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Newark, NJ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to All Countries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024