alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-14]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Pryor, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Pryor, OK.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 12632 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 
(63 FR 12632). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1988. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 5, 1998.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12738 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2020097EN.01006901.xml

| 24.3.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/69

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 as regards financial discipline as from financial year 2021 and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 as regards flexibility between pillars in respect of calendar year 2020’

(COM(2019) 580 — 2019/0253(COD))

(2020/C 97/09)

| Referral | European Parliament, 13.11.2019
  Council of the European Union, 15.11.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary session | 11.12.2019 |
| Plenary session No | 548 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 191/1/1 |

Referral

European Parliament, 13.11.2019

Council of the European Union, 15.11.2019

Legal basis

Articles 43(2) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary session

11.12.2019

Plenary session No

548

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

191/1/1

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 548th plenary session of 11 and 12 December 2019 (meeting of 11 December 2019), by 191 votes to 1 with 1 abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 11 December 2019.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Luca JAHIER

---
No. 12-7451.

#### Quochuy Tran *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
---

---

Exhibit 8

# Subsidiaries

Currently our subsidiaries are:

| |  | TTI-Telecom
International Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of the State
of Delaware, and domiciled in New Jersey, U.S.A.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI-Telecom
International B.V., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of The
Netherlands, and domiciled in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
Telecom Australia PTY. Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of
           Australia, and domiciled in Sydney, Australia.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Axarte
Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom, and
           domiciled in Newberry, UK.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
BVI Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands, and domiciled in the British Virgin Islands.
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
Telecom (HK) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of Hong
Kong, and domiciled in Hong Kong.
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
Telecom Software Private Limited, 99% subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of India,
and domiciled in Mumbai, India.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
Telecom de Costa Rica S.A., a 99% subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of Costa Rica,
and domiciled in San Jose, Costa Rica.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | TTI
Team Software (Malta) Ltd., a 99% subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of Malta, and
           domiciled in Valleta, Malta.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | CDR
Technologies a wholly-owned subsidiary, incorporated under the laws of Israel, and
domiciled in Petach Tikva, Israel.
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Misla, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 58]

*652Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered April 25, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant timely objected at trial *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) to the complainant’s erroneous response to a question posed by the prosecutor, which response indicated that the police called him to the precinct on a particular day to “view some pictures.” The Supreme Court immediately sustained the objection and instructed the jury to strike the complainant’s response from their minds *(see People v Gibbs,*59 NY2d 930, 932 [1983]; *People v Berg,*59 NY2d 294, 299-300 [1983]; *People v Lugo,*218 AD2d 711 [1995]). The prosecutor promptly elicited testimony from the complainant regarding his identification of the defendant in a police lineup. Based upon the foregoing, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for a mistrial *(see People v Griffin,*29 NY2d 91, 93 [1971]; *People v Caserta,*19 NY2d 18 [1966]).

The defendant also timely objected *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) to the prosecutor’s questioning of the arresting officer regarding whether other civilians or only law enforcement officers were in the room with the defendant when he was taken into custody on the ground that the questions improperly led the jury to infer that he had a prior criminal record *(see People v Mullin,*41 NY2d 475 [1977]; *People v Blanchard,*83 AD2d 905 [1981]). However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the questions did not lead to this inference and, in any event, the questions were unanswered and thus caused no prejudice.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 


        INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

        Pursuant to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan


         


        THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (this “First Amendment”), made this 11th day of November 2011, by and between Bluegreen Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), and David Bidgood (“Grantee”).


         


        WHEREAS, the Company and Grantee entered into that certain Incentive Stock Option Agreement Pursuant to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, made effective as of July 19, 2006 (the “Agreement”); and


         


        WHEREAS, the Company and Grantee desire to amend the Agreement to modify the expiration date of the stock options granted under the Agreement, as set forth herein. 


         


        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and the terms, covenants and conditions set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows:


         


        1.                  Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


         


        “4. Notwithstanding any other provision herein to the contrary, the Options shall, to the extent not theretofore exercised or terminated, expire and become void on November 25, 2011.” 


         


        2.                  Except to the extent amended hereby, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.


         


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be duly executed by an authorized officer, and Grantee has executed this First Amendment, all to be effective as of the date first above written.


         


        	 	BLUEGREEN CORPORATION 
	 	 
	 	By	/s/	 
	 	Name: 	Michael D. Kaminer
	 	Title: 	Senior Vice President & General Counsel
	 	 
	 	 
	 	GRANTEE
	 	 
	 	/s/	 
	 	David Bidgood
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
9:30 a.m. and adjourn at 1:00 p.m. on June 3, 1998, at the Clovis 
Public Library, Ingram Room, 701 North Main Street, Clovis, New Mexico 
88101. The purpose of the meeting is to hold a factfinding meeting in 
followup to the September 15, 1997, inquiry into official activities 
during food stamp fraud sting operation in Clovis, New Mexico.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Philip Montez, Director of the Western 
Regional Office, 213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, April 22, 1998.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 98-11588 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
No. 12-7000.

#### Bartholomew *v.*Pasadena Tournament of Roses Assn., Inc., et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**Certificationof the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S. C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 20-Ffor the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jerry Wong, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of his knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

June 28, 2010

 

 
| /s/ Jerry Wong          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Jerry Wong              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),
the undersigned,  Anthony J. Miceli,  Chief Financial  Officer of United Capital
Corp., a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify,  to his
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2002 of
the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                              By: /s/ Anthony J. Miceli
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Anthony J. Miceli
                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                  November 1, 2002
```
Exhibit 10.1


AGREEMENT


AGREEMENT (“Agreement”),
dated as of May 16, 2006, by and between New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation (“Company”), and Steven F. Siegel (“Executive”).


RECITALS


A.    Executive
is currently Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the
Company.


B.     The
Company and Executive entered into an employment agreement dated as of September 25,
1998 (as amended and extended, the “Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the
terms of the Employment Agreement, the term of the “Employment Period” under
the Employment Agreement expires on December 31, 2006.


C.     The
Company desires to extend the “Employment Period” under the Employment
Agreement for a term of three (3) years (i.e., from January 1, 2007
through December 31, 2009) and otherwise on the same terms and conditions
as the Employment Agreement (the “Siegel Employment Agreement Extension”).


D.     The
Executive Compensation and Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company by Unanimous Written Consent dated as of May 5, 2006
authorized and approved the Siegel Employment Agreement Extension.


AGREEMENT


IN CONSIDERATION
of the premises and the mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereby
agree to modify the terms of the Employment Agreement as follows:


1.                                       The Employment Period under the
Employment Agreement shall be extended for a term of three (3) years and
accordingly shall expire on December 31, 2009, subject to the extension
provisions contained in Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement.


2.                                           Except as herein provided, all of the
terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in
full force and effect.


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first
above written.


	
  

  	
   

  	
  NEW PLAN EXCEL REALTY TRUST, INC., a Maryland
  corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
  Glenn J. Rufrano

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  STEVEN F. SIEGEL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Steven F. Siegel
# L_2010160EN.01000101.xml

| 26.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 160/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 160/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 560/2010

of 25 June 2010

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne’ or ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne’ or ‘Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 June 2010.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 157, 10.7.2009, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Farine de blé noir de Bretagne/Farine de blé noir de Bretagne — Gwinizh du Breizh (PGI)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1308 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1308

To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on certain machinery used to 
                            recycle mercury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               July 29, (legislative day, June 30), 1993

Mr. Durenberger introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend until January 1, 1995, the duty on certain machinery used to 
                            recycle mercury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MERCURY RECYCLING CRUSHERS AND DISTILLERS.

    Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
the United States is amended by inserting in numerical sequence the 
following new headings:

      

       ``  9902.87.17    Distiller units for removing mercury from mercury                      No change        No change        On or before 12/      
                          containing fluorescent powder to the extent that                                                         31/94             '';
                          the recovered mercury is in free-flowing liquid                                                                            and
                          form and over 99 percent pure (provided for in                                                                                
                          subheading 8419.40.00).............................  Free                                                                     
       ``  9902.87.18    Crush and sieve units and H.I.D. lamp crushers for                     No change        No change        On or before 12/      
                          crushing used fluorescent lights and other mercury                                                       31/94             ''.
                          containing waste items for recycling purposes and                                                                             
                          capable of recovering over 99 percent of the                                                                                  
                          mercury in the waste items (provided for in                                                                                   
                          subheading 8479.82.00).............................  Free                                                                     

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with respect to goods 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 
fifteenth day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```