alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Maryland Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Maryland Heat Content of Natural Gas Deliveries to Consumers  (BTU per Cubic Foot)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,038  | 1,035  | 1,037 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,027  | 1,027  | 1,037  | 1,045  | 1,053  | 1,055  | 1,051  | 1,047  | 1,042  | 1,044 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,040  | 1,039  | 1,039  | 1,039  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13317]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 3, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. Rex K. Alexander, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Ronald F. Tanner, 
Cornville, Arizona; to acquire voting shares of BOC Bancshares, Inc., 
Chouteau, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Bank of Commerce, Chouteau, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 14, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-13317 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1558 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1558

   To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to require producers of an 
 agricultural commodity for which an acreage limitation program is in 
   effect to pay certain costs as a condition of agricultural loans, 
            purchases, and payments, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Agricultural Act of 1949 to require producers of an 
 agricultural commodity for which an acreage limitation program is in 
   effect to pay certain costs as a condition of agricultural loans, 
            purchases, and payments, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agricultural Irrigation and Deficit 
Reduction Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN COSTS UNDER ACREAGE LIMITATION PROGRAMS.

    Title I of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1441 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 116. PAYMENT OF CERTAIN COSTS UNDER ACREAGE LIMITATION PROGRAMS.

    ``(a) In General.--If an acreage limitation program is announced 
for a crop of a commodity under this title, as a condition of 
eligibility for loans, purchases, and payments for the crop under this 
title, the producers on a farm shall pay to the Secretary of the 
Interior an amount that is equal to the full cost incurred by the 
Federal Government of the delivery to the farm of water that is used in 
the production of the crop, as determined by the Secretary of the 
Interior.
    ``(b) Application.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to the 
        delivery of water pursuant to a contract that is entered into 
        before January 1, 1995, under any provision of Federal 
        reclamation law.
            ``(2) Renewal or amendment.--If a contract described in 
        paragraph (1) is renewed or amended on or after January 1, 
        1995, subsection (a) shall apply to the delivery of water 
        beginning on the date of renewal or amendment.''.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-7297.

#### Ky Tan Le *v.*Social Security Administration.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 4715-012]


Felts Mills Energy Partners, L.P.; Notice Dismissing Request for 
Rehearing

May 13, 1998.
    On March 17, 1998, the Director, Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
issued an order granting to the licensee for the Felts Mills Project 
No. 4715 an extension of time to comply with the requirements of 
Articles 205 and 405 of its license. On April 17, 1998, New York Rivers 
United filed a request for rehearing of the Director's order.
    Rule 713 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure 
provides that rehearing may be sought only with respect to a ``final 
Commission decision or other final order.'' \1\ The Director's order in 
this case, allowing the licensee additional time to submit its plan and 
aperture cards, is interlocutory, and is not therefore subject to 
rehearing.\2\ Accordingly, New York Rivers United's request for 
rehearing is dismissed.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.713(b).
    \2\ See e.g., Wisconsin Valley Improvement Company, 80 FERC 
para. 61,319 (1997).
    \3\ Even if the rehearing request had not been interlocutory, it 
would have to be dismissed since a request for rehearing may be 
filed only by a party to the proceeding. With regard to post-
licensing proceedings, the Commission only entertains motions to 
intervene where the filings at issue entail material changes in the 
plan of project development or in the terms and conditions of the 
license, or could adversely affect the rights of property-holders in 
a manner not contemplated by the license. See Kings River 
Conservation District, 36 FERC para. 61,365 (1986). Such was not the 
case here. Thus, notice of this proceeding was not issued, and 
motions to intervene were not entertained.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice constitutes final agency action. Requests for rehearing 
by the Commission of this dismissal notice may be filed within 30 days 
of the date of issuance of this notice, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.713.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-13201 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# L_2010279EN.01003201.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 279/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 279/32

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 October 2010

appointing one Romanian member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015

(2010/632/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 300(2) and Article 302 thereof, in conjunction with Article 7 of the Protocol on Transitional Provisions annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the proposal made by Romania,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of the members of the European Economic and Social Committee expired on 20 September 2010. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of the members of the European Economic and Social Committee expired on 20 September 2010.

| (2) | On 13 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1), except for one Romanian member, whom the Romanian authorities reserved the right to nominate at a later stage. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 13 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1), except for one Romanian member, whom the Romanian authorities reserved the right to nominate at a later stage.

| (3) | By a letter which reached the Council on 28 September 2010, the Romanian authorities proposed to the Council a candidate for appointment as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee during the abovementioned period, in order to complete the list of members allocated to Romania by the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

By a letter which reached the Council on 28 September 2010, the Romanian authorities proposed to the Council a candidate for appointment as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee during the abovementioned period, in order to complete the list of members allocated to Romania by the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Eugen LUCAN is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee, for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 October 2010.

For the Council

The President

E. SCHOUPPE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Fort Lauderdale, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Fort Lauderdale, FL Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Jamaica (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     | 1   |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 25  | 76  | 112
|2022                                                                                                                              | 84  | 109 | 84  | 129 | 139 | 42  | 117 | 109 | 105 | 142 | 137 | 144
|2023                                                                                                                              | 106 | 160 | 109 | 27  | 1   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND , TEXAS
JUDGMENT

Fredrick Calicutt
, * From the 161st District Court of E ctor County, Trial Court No. B

- 2 0

- 0 255

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 2 95

- CR * July 25 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas
, * Memorand um Opinion by Bailey
, C. J. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1530 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1530

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require Federal contracts 
 debarment for persons who violate labor relations provisions, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 7 (legislative day, September 27), 1993

   Mr. Simon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require Federal contracts 
 debarment for persons who violate labor relations provisions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Contracts Debarment Act of 
1993''.

SEC. 2. DEBARMENT.

    The National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new section:

                     ``federal contracts debarment

    ``Sec. 20. (a) Any person or entity that, with a clear pattern and 
practice, violates the provisions of this Act shall be ineligible for 
all Federal contracts for a period of three years.
    ``(b) The Secretary of Labor shall promulgate regulations regarding 
debarment provisions and procedures. Such regulations shall require 
that any Federal contracting agency shall refrain from entering into 
further contracts, or extensions, or other modifications of existing 
contracts with any person or entity described in subsection (a) during 
the three-year period immediately following a determination by the 
Secretary that such person or entity is in violation (as described in 
subsection (a)) of this Act.
    ``(c) A debarment may be removed, or the period of debarment may be 
reduced, by the Secretary of Labor upon the submission of an 
application to the Secretary that is supported by documentary evidence 
and that sets forth appropriate grounds for the granting of the 
debarment removal or reduction, including compliance with the final 
orders found to have been willfully violated, bona fide change of 
ownership or management, or a fraud or misrepresentation of the 
charging party.''.

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          88,865
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  310,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,166
<INVENTORY>                                    321,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               724,798
<PP&E>                                          70,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                 402,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 802,568
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,275
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,230
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   802,568
<SALES>                                      1,472,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,475,998
<CGS>                                          815,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  559,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 97,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             97,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    97,505
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.026
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.026


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Daniel Trahan, Appellant, v Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 893]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Gilbert, J.), entered October 28, 2002, which denied petitioner’s motion for back wages and benefits.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion of petitioner seeking back pay and benefits for the period of time following his 30-day suspension until the initial, annulled determination and for the period of time between the initial, annulled determination and the subsequent, valid determination and as modified the judgment is affirmed with costs to petitioner, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Jefferson County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Petitioner was terminated from his employment following a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 and commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking reinstatement. When this proceeding was before us previously, we annulled the determination based on a procedural violation, and we remitted the matter to respondent for a de novo determination “by a person who was not involved in the hearing” *(Matter of Trahan v Jefferson County Dept. of*
      *1310
      *Social Servs.,*281 AD2d 984, 984 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 610 [2002]). Upon remittal, respondent again determined that termination was the appropriate remedy. Petitioner thereafter moved in Supreme Court for back pay and benefits but did not challenge the propriety of the termination itself. We agree with petitioner that he is entitled to back pay and benefits for the period of time following his 30-day suspension until the initial, annulled determination (see Civil Service Law § 75 [3]; *see also Matter of Amkraut v Hults,*21 AD2d 260, 262-263 [1964], *affd*15 NY2d 627 [1964]) and for the period of time between the initial, annulled determination and the subsequent, valid determination, “less any compensation derived from other employment during [those periods] and any unemployment insurance benefits received for [those periods]” *(Matter of Sinicropi v Bennett,*60 NY2d 918, 920 [1983]; *see Matter of Collins v Parishville-Hopkinton Cent. School Dist.,*274 AD2d 732, 734 [2000]). We therefore modify the judgment by granting that part of petitioner’s motion seeking back pay and benefits for those two periods of time, and we remit this matter to Supreme Court, Jefferson County, to determine the amount of back pay and the benefits to which petitioner is entitled, in accordance with our decision herein, and to conduct an evidentiary hearing, if needed. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
No 12M71.

No. 12M72.

No. 12M74.

No. 12M75.

#### Marquis *v.*U. S. Bank N. A.; Christian *v.*Frank; Chandler *v.*Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.; Coughlin *v.*Crews, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.; and *1121Walker *v.*Cain, Warden.

No. 12M77.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.