alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13020]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0118]


Clearance Request Entitled Standard Form 94, Statement of Witness

AGENCY: Federal Vehicle Policy Division, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for an extension to an existing OMB clearance 
(3090-0118).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve an extension of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Standard Form 94, Statement of Witness.

DATES: Comment Due Date: July 14, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Majorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Moses, Federal Vehicle Policy 
Division (202) 501-2507.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
review and approve information collection, 3090-0118, concerning 
Standard Form 94, Statement of Witness. This form is used by all 
Federal agencies to report accident information involving U.S. 
Government vehicles.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 816; annual responses: 1; average hours per response: 
.20; burden hours: 272.
    Copy of Proposal: A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the 
GSA Acquistion Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or 
by faxing your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-13020 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
NUMBER 13-21-00342-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

ANTHONY LEO SHERIDAN AND 

CCS ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., Appellants,

v.

KELLI D. WILLIAMS, 

MICHAEL RICHARDSON, AND 

SCOUTVIEW SPORTS, Appellees.

On appeal from the 26th District Court

of Williamson County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant’s third motion for extension 

of time to file brief. The Court, having fully examined and considered the extensions 
2

previously granted in this cause and appellant’s pending motion, is of the opinion that the 

extension requested should be granted by Order.

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. It is therefore 

ordered that the Honorable Darwin McKee, counsel for appellant, file appellant’s brief with 

this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on October 17, 2022. Appellant is reminded the Court 

may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant complies with this order 

or timely requests an extension which reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is 

not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

22nd day of August, 2022.
#### PALATKA HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellant, v. PUTNAM COUNTY and Putnam County Solid Waste Collection and Disposal District, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-4113

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 17, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Scott C. Dupont, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
No. 12-7019.

#### Edwards *v.*Scutt, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1553

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor Management

Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional remedies in certain unfair

labor practice cases, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor

Management Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional

remedies in certain unfair labor practice cases, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations Rem5 edies Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. BOARD REMEDIES.

7 Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act

8 (29 U.S.C. 160(c)) is amended by inserting after the
2

S 1553 IS

1 fourth sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘If the Board

2 finds that an employee was discharged in violation of this

3 Act, the Board in such order shall (1) award back pay

4 in an amount equal to three times the employee’s wage

5 rate at the time of the unfair labor practice and (2) notify

6 such employee of the employee’s right to sue for punitive

7 damages and damages with respect to a wrongful dis8 charge under section 303 of the Labor Management Rela9 tions Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), as amended by the Labor

10 Relations Remedies Act of 1993.’’.

11 SEC. 3. COURT REMEDIES.

12 Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act,

13 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), is amended by adding at the end

14 the following new subsections:

15 ‘‘(c) It shall be unlawful, for purposes of this section,

16 for an employer to discharge an employee for exercising

17 rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act

18 (29 U.S.C. 158).

19 ‘‘(d) An employee whose discharge is determined by

20 the National Labor Relations Board under section 10(c)

21 to be a violation of this Act may sue therefore in any dis22 trict court of the United States without respect to the

23 amount in controversy, or in any other court having juris24 diction over the parties to recover compensatory and puni-
3

S 1553 IS

1 tive damages in addition to the back pay ordered by the

2 Board.

3 ‘‘(e) Nothing contained in section 8 or section 10 of

4 the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158), or in

5 this section shall limit the rights and remedies under any

6 State or Federal law or before any court or other tribunal

7 of an employee discharged by an employer.’’.

Æ
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,796  | 4,416 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,587  | 1,481  | 1,406  | 1,442  | 1,419  | 1,449  | 1,403  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,258  | 1,329  | 1,427  | 1,530  | 1,444  | 1,456  | 1,527  | 1,430  | 1,400  | 1,347 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,333  | 1,352  | 1,057  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09121]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 96 to 99, 
revised as of July 1, 2014, on page 859, in Sec.  98.244, reinstate 
paragraph (b)(4)(ix) to read as follows:

Sec.  98.244  Monitoring and QA/QC requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ix) Method 18 at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-6.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-09121 Filed 4-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Yossi Brikman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Yossi Brikman*
-----------------
Yossi Brikman
Chief Financial Officer

June 24, 2004

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
#### IN RE: ESTATE OF Donald Keith BIRCHARD

141 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/18/2017

OC048-2015

(Susquehanna)

Affirmed
### 8 Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: - AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Co sts per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$85/h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Pe rmanent

Modification 32.0 $ 2,720.0

0 $111 $ 2,831.00 

### 1 06 $ 300,086.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 300,086



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### 9

There are 106 active US registered 727s.

There are 449 US registered 727s per Boeing flying time index.

Note that per Boeing there is only one Grp III airplane which will be affected. The given workhours does not include the inspection portion of the SB since this is only relevant to the one Grp

III airplane.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES* NO

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Exhibit 12.1



COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Mellon Financial Corporation                                                            
|(Parent Corporation)(a) (dollar amounts in millions)                                    
|                                                                                        
|Income before income taxes and equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries
|Fixed charges: interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs                 
|                                                                                        
|Total earnings (as defined)                                                             
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Ratio of earnings (as defined) to fixed charges                                         
|                                                                                        

|(a) | The parent Corporation ratios include the accounts of Mellon Financial Corporation (the Corporation); Mellon Funding Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Corporation that functions as a financing entity for the Corporation and its subsidiaries by issuing commercial paper and other debt guaranteed by the Corporation; Mellon Capital I and Mellon Capital II, special-purpose statutory trusts formed by
the Corporation that exist solely to issue capital securities; and MIPA, LLC, a single member limited liability company wholly owned by the Corporation, created to hold and administer corporate owned life insurance. Because these ratios exclude from
earnings the equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries, these ratios vary with the payment of dividends by such subsidiaries.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                     2,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                      483
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,582
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,492
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,582
<SALES>                                          1,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,981
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Woodward, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ Roger Woodward
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Roger Woodward
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  April 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Viper Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Xiao Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Xiao Chen Name: Xiao Chen Title: Chief Financial Officer Date: September 16, 2011
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Calais, ME Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Calais, ME Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 14     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024