alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EX PIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GAWKER MEDIA, LLC, NICK DENTON, ) and A. J. DAULERIO ) ) Petitioners, ) ) BLOGWIRE HUNGARY SZELLEMI ) ALKOTÁST HASZNOSÍTÓ, KFT, )
) Specially appearing ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case Nos. 2D14-5591 ) 2D15-1259 TERRY GENE BOLLEA, professionally ) known as HULK HOGAN, ) CONSOLIDATED ) Respondent. ) _________________________________ )

Opinion filed October 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Pamela A.M. Campbell, Judge.

Gregg D. Thomas and Rachel E. Fugate of Thomas & LoCicero PL, Tampa, and Seth

D. Berlin and Alia L. Smith of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schultz, LLP, Washington, District of Columbia, for Petitioners.2 Kenneth G. Turkel and Christina K. Ramirez of Bajo Cuva Cohen & Turkel, P.A., Tampa, and Charles J. Harder and Douglas E. Mirell of Harder Mirell & Abrams LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated cases are dismissed as moot. See Gawker Me dia,

LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137173) pertaining to the InnerWorkings, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofInnerWorkings, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of InnerWorkings, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Chicago, IL

March 4, 2009
No. 12-498.

#### Kotzeva *v.*Horne, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8215** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JASON CONRAD POOLE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:96

- cr - 00238

- AW

- l; 8:09

- cv - 01440

- AW )

Submitted : October 20 , 2010 Decided: February 4 , 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Robert W. Biddle, Booth M. Ripke , NATHANS & B IDDLE L L P, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Barbara S. Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee
. Unpublished opini ons are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason Conrad Poole appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his motions under 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 and granting his motion to reduce sentence u nder 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its written order
. United States v. Poole , Nos. 8:96

- cr - 00238

- AW

- 1; 8:09

- cv - 01440

- AW (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2009)
. *

AFFIRMED We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

* We note the discrepancy between the oral s entence of 210 months and the revised order granting Poole’s § 3582(c)(2) motion which imposes the mandatory minimum sentence of 240 months. We find the oral sentence ambiguous because its plain meaning would lead to “an irrational or abused result.” Uni ted States v. Villano , 816 F.2d 1448, 1453 n.6 (10t h Cir. 1987) (en banc). Therefore, we affirm the written sentencing order.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**17 CA 15-00443**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

MARIA A. LEGGO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
MARTIN J. LEGGO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

VENZON LAW FIRM PC, BUFFALO (JAMES P. RENDA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
DAVIDSON FINK LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), entered June 11, 2014 in a divorce action. The judgment, among other things, directed defendant to pay maintenance to plaintiff.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 27541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13298]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL169-1b; FRL-6012-8]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the March 5, 1998, Illinois State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request containing amendments to 
volatile organic material emission control rules for wood furniture 
coating operations in the Chicago and Metro-East ozone nonattainment 
areas. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving the State's requests as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because EPA views this action as noncontroversial and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for approving the 
State's request is set forth in the direct final rule. The direct final 
rule will become effective without further notice unless the Agency 
receives relevant adverse written comment on this proposed rule. Should 
the Agency receive such comment, it will publish a final rule informing 
the public that the direct final rule did not take effect and such 
public comment received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. If no adverse written comments are 
received, the direct final rule will take effect on the date stated in 
that document and no further activity will be taken on this proposed 
rule. EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this 
action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before June 18, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal are available for inspection at: 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Environmental 
Protection Specialist, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs 
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the final rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: April 29, 1998.
Barry C. DeGraff,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-13298 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
330A16

#### Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. Etransmedia Technology, Inc.

Pit’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal

Allowed 04/20/20X7
#### Micah LAMB, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-4447

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017

Rehearing Denied January 12, 2018

*1154Micah Lamb, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits.

WOLF, LEWIS, and M.K THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 12-595.

#### Conrad *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### COM. v. MOODY, T.

1640 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/28/2017

CP-22-CR-0003913-2000

(Dauphin)

Affirmed
No. 12-6931.

#### Williams *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Alabama Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Alabama Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 0      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 4      | 2      | 51     | 45     | 56    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 62     | 76     | 78     | 95     | 107    | 153    | 111    | 88     | 84     | 80    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 105    | 192    | 193    | 190    | 377    | 300    | 147    | 89     | 83     | 91    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 71     | 74     | 95     | 78     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7074.

#### Garraway *v.*Samuels, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to our knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *result of operations of the
Trust.


Date: August 11, 2005                   /s/ Marcia Markowski
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Marcia Markowski
                                        Trust officer of The Corporate Trustee

*    The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
     transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in
     financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The
     Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of
     expenses. Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of
     financial condition or cash flows.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 4, 1998, Lonza 
Riverside, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amphetamine (1100)..........................  II                        
Phenylacetone (8501)........................  II                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in 
bulk for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than July 20, 1998.

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-13328 Filed 5-18-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection
with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of InnerWorkings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the period ending December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), we, Eric D. Belcher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jeffrey P. Pritchett,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|By: | / S /    ERIC D. BELCHER          | 
|--- | --------------------------------- | 
|    | Eric D. Belcher                   | 
|    | Chief Executive Officer           | 
|    |                                   | 
|By: | / S
    /    JEFFREY P. PRITCHETT | 
|    | Jeffrey P. Pritchett              | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer           | 







Date: March 10, 2016
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cobra Oil & Gas Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Doug Berry, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 27TH day of August, 2007.



| | DOUG BERRY                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Doug Berry                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

































---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1450

Respecting the relationship between workers’ compensation benefits and the

benefits available under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker

Protection Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

GRAHAM, Mr. KEMPTHORNE, and Mr. MACK) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and

Human Resources

A BILL

Respecting the relationship between workers’ compensation

benefits and the benefits available under the Migrant

and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that—

5 (1) the fundamental premise of the workers’

6 compensation system, which is the exclusivity of

7 workers’ compensation for workplace injuries as an

8 alternative to a fault-based system relying on costly
2

S 1450 IS

1 and lengthy litigation in the courts, must be pre2 served,

3 (2) this premise was threatened by the decision

4 in 1990 of the United States Supreme Court in

5 Adams Fruit Co. Inc. v. Barrett, 494 U.S. 638,

6 which held that migrant and seasonal farmworkers

7 could bring a private right of action for certain job8 related injuries under the Migrant and Seasonal Ag9 ricultural Worker Protection Act even where the em10 ployer has provided workers’ compensation coverage

11 of such farmworkers,

12 (3) the Adams Fruit decision did not reflect the

13 intent of the Congress when it enacted the Migrant

14 and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act in

15 1982,

16 (4) the Adams Fruit decision single out agricul17 tural employers as the only employers in America

18 who can be subjected to lawsuits as a result of work19 place injuries even where they have provided work20 ers’ compensation to their employees,

21 (5) Congress expressed its disapproval of the

22 Adams Fruit decision in Public Law 102–392 by

23 overturning the decision until July 6, 1993, and

24 (6) it is essential that the exclusivity of work25 ers’ compensation be permanently restored.
3

S 1450 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF EXPIRATION.

2 Section 325(c) of the Legislative Branch Appropria3 tions Act, 1993 (29 U.S.C. 1854 note) is amended to read

4 as follows:

5 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to all cases in which a final judg7 ment has not been entered before October 6, 1992.’’.

Æ
No. 12-6995.

#### Perry *v.*Reynolds, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.27

HUIPU ELECTRONICS (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD Add: Block R2-A2, South
District, High-tech Park, Nanshan Dristrict, Shenzhen City Tel:
0755-26984710 Fax: 0755-2698740 Web: www.huipu.com.cn

HUIPU ELECTRONICS (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD

General Purchase Contract

|Buyer: Huipu Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | Contract No. HPC200826002
|--------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|Seller: iASPEC Software Co., Ltd.             | Date: August 26, 2008    

|NO.   | Items          | Descriptions                         | Quantity  | Unit Price | Sub-Total (RMB)
|----- | -------------- | ------------------------------------ | --------- | ---------- | ---------------
|      |                |                                      |           |            |                
|1     | 19W Widescreen | LCD/No DV1/NoSpeaker/All
      black | 58,800.00 | 795.00     | 46,746,000.00  
|2     | 15"LCDTV       | HITACH                               | 1,243.00  | 664.00     | 825,352.00     
|3     | 26"LCDTV       | All WeiguanInventory                 | 2,000.00  | 1,718.00   | 3,436,000.00   
|4     | 40"LCDTV       | All WeiguanInventory                 | 2,000.00  | 3,020.00   | 6,040,000.00   
|      |                |                                      |           |            |                
|Total |                |                                      |           |            | 57,047,352.00  

Remarks:

1. Delivery date: Sep 1-Sep 30, 2008 (Specific delivery date to
be notified). 2. Quality standards: Standard ex-factory inspection as agreed by
both parties. 3. Trade terms: FOB ShenZhen.

4. Payment terms: L/C at sight.

5. Inspection and Demurs: Within three days from the goods
delivered to the Buyer' factory.

6. Spare parts: None.

7. Packing: PE Bag

---

8. Enforcibility and Dispute Settlement: Facsimile of the
Contract upon execution by both parties shall be deemed equally authentic. The
Contract is governed by PRC Law. All disputes in connection with this contract
or the execution thereof shall be settled at the court of Shenzhen Nanshan
District.

|Buyer:                               | Seller:                  
|------------------------------------ | -------------------------
|Huipu Electronic (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd | iASPEC Software Co., Ltd.
|SIGNATURE                            | SIGNATURE                
|                                     |                          
|                                     |                          
|Lu Zhi Duan                          | Ding Quan                
|Date: August 26, 2008                | Date: August 26, 2008    

---