alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
413 P.2d 277

#### STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Dwight Simmons PALMER, Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CR 80.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

April 22, 1966.

Rehearing Denied May 23,1966.

*219Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., .by Gary K. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

O’Reilly, Pollock, Murphy *&*Pizzo, by Charles S. Pizzo, Phoenix, for appellant.

CAMERON, Acting Chief Judge.

This is a review for fundamental error pursuant to 13-1715 A.R.S.

On or about 2 May, 1961, the defendant, Dwight *Simmons*Palmer, represented by counsel, entered a plea of guilty to the crime of burglary in the second degree. After the judgment of the court finding the defendant guilty of the crime as charged, the court, on 17 May, 1961, suspended imposition of sentence for a period of 18 months from that date. Less than 18 months later, on or about 23 August, 1962, the court entered an order revoking and setting aside the defendant’s probation, and defendant was, on 18 September, 1962, sentenced to not less than four and one-half nor more than five years in the State Penitentiary. The record indicates that defendant was represented by counsel at this stage in the proceedings.

Defendant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona, and the court appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal pursuant to 13-161 A.R.S. Said appointment was made 6 December, 1962.

For reasons which are neither apparent nor understandable, the record on appeal was not received by this Court until 7 March, 1966, and it is noted that the defendant had already been released from prison. This delay not being raised by appellant, we need not consider it on appeal.

Counsel for appellant in his brief, indicated that a complete examination of the record revealed no error, and that defendant’s rights were fully protected at all stages of the proceedings. The record discloses that the defendant was represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings, and a complete examination of the entire record before us fails to reveal any error. State v. Garcia, 1 Ariz.App. 134, 400 P.2d 341 (1965); State v. Tannahill, 1 Ariz.App. 281, 402 P.2d 29 (1965), and State v. Szoyka, 97 Ariz. 223, 399 P.2d 121 (1965).

The judgment and sentence are affirmed.

DONOFRIO, J., and JOHN P. COLLINS, Superior Court Judge, concurring.

NOTE: Chief Judge HENRY S. STEVENS having requested that he be relieved from consideration of this matter, Judge John P. Collins was called to sit in his stead and participate in the determination of this decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,760)
<INVENTORY>                                     43,936
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,109
<PP&E>                                          36,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,466
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,842
<SALES>                                         35,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,219
<CGS>                                           24,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (311)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    434
<INCOME-TAX>                                       152
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                282
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       282
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COX TECHNOLOGIES, INC FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,260,256
<SECURITIES>                                    41,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,788,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                    29,527
<INVENTORY>                                  1,099,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,272,843
<PP&E>                                       6,242,049
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,923,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,404,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,197,763
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,885,495
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,309,154)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,404,253
<SALES>                                      2,372,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,372,863
<CGS>                                        1,178,228
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,219,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                173,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            153,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   173,269
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1395

Relating to the tariff treatment of certain plastic flat goods.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

Relating to the tariff treatment of certain plastic flat goods.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASTIC FLAT GOODS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 42 of the Harmonized

5 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by insert6 ing in numerical sequence the following new subheading,

7 with the article description having the same degree of in8 dentation as the article description in subheading

9 4202.21.90:

‘‘ 4202.32.05 With outer surface area of not

less than 20 percent leather ..... 8% Free (IL,CA)

7.4% (E,J)

35%

’’.
2

•S 1395 IS

1 (b) DEFINITION.—The Additional U.S. Notes to

2 chapter 42 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the Unit3 ed States are amended by adding at the end the following

4 new note:

5 ‘‘3. For purposes of subheading 4202.32.10, the term

6 ‘reinforced or laminated plastics’ means—

7 ‘‘(a) rigid, infusible, insoluble plastics formed

8 by the application of heat and high pressure on 2 or

9 more superimposed layers of fibrous sheet material

10 which has been impregnated or coated with plastics,

11 or

12 ‘‘(b) rigid plastics comprised of imbedded fi13 brous reinforcing material (such as paper, fabric, as14 bestos, and fibrous glass) impregnated, coated or

15 combined with plastics usually by the application of

16 heat or heat and low pressure.’’.

17 (c) STAGED RATE REDUCTIONS.—Any staged rate

18 reduction of a special rate of duty set forth in subheading

19 4202.31.60 that was proclaimed by the President before

20 the date of the enactment of this Act and that takes effect

21 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act shall

22 apply to the corresponding special rate of duty in sub23 heading 4202.32.05 (as added by subsection (a)).
3

•S 1395 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply with

3 respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse

4 for consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
089P17

#### T and A Amusements, LLC; and Crazie Overstock Promotions, LLC v. Patrick McCrory, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina; Frank L. Perry, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety; Mark J. Senter, in his Official Capacity as Branch Head of the Alcohol Law Enforcement Division; Jody Williams, in his Official Capacity as the Chief of Police of the City of Asheboro, North Carolina; and Maynard B. Reid, Jr., in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Randolph County

Defs’ (McCrory, Perry, Senter, and Williams) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31) (COA16-161)

Denied
No. 12-6533.

#### Kormondy *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25852-25853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Public Outreach Meeting; Tacoma, Washington

May 5, 1998
    The Office of Hydropower Licensing will hold a public Outreach 
Meeting in Tacoma, Washington, on Thursday, May 21, 1998. The Outreach 
Meeting is scheduled to start at 9:00 am and finish at 5:00 pm.
    The purpose of the Outreach program is to familiarize federal, 
state, and other government agencies, Indian tribes, nongovernmental 
organizations, licensees, and other interested parties

[[Page 25853]]

with the Commission's hydropower licensing program. The topics for the 
Outreach Meeting are pre-licensing, licensing, and post-licensing 
procedures for hydroelectric projects in Washington whose licenses 
expire between calender years 2000 and 2010.
    Staff from the Commission's Office of Hydropower Licensing will 
preside over the meetings.
    The location of the Outreach Meeting is: Sheraton Hotel, 1320 
Broadway Plaza, Tacoma, WA 98402, (253) 591-4137.
    Directions to Hotel: Take Interstate 5 to exit #133 City Center, 
Take Highway 705, following ``City Center'' signs toward the downtown 
area, Take the ``A'' street exit, Follow ``A'' street to 11th street, 
Turn left on 11th street, Go uphill to the second stoplight, Broadway, 
Turn left on Broadway, Go two blocks to 1320 Broadway and you will be 
in front of the hotel.
    If you plan to attend, notify John Blair, Western Outreach 
Coordinator, fax: 202-219-2152; telephone: 202-219-2845 or Theresa 
Gibson (202) 219-2793.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12357 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 12-6163.

#### Caruthers *v.*Norman, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6874.

#### Peede *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33, 876, TA-W-33-876A and TA-W-33-876B]

Jansport, Incorporated and Burlington, WA, et al; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on October 26, 1997, applicable 
to all workers of JanSport, Incorporated located in Burlington, 
Washington. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
November 7, 1997 (62 FR 60279).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Information provided by 
the company official and the State agency show that worker separations 
will occur at JanSport's sewing operations in Everett, Washington and 
the production facility in Wenatchee, Washington. The workers are 
engaged in employment related to the production of backpacks and 
equipment products. Based on this new information, the Department is 
amending the certification to include workers at the sewing operations 
in Everett, Washington and the production facility in Wenatchee, 
Washington.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33, 876 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of JanSport, Incorporated, Burlington, Washington 
(TA-W-33, 876); the Sewing Operations in Everett, Washington (TA-W-
33, 876A); and Wenatchee, Washington (TA-W-33. 876B), who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 
22, 1996 through October 26, 1999, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 16th day of April, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-12021 Filed 5-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Jerome ROGOWSKI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D14-336

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Lynn Rosenthal, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07007855CF10A.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


             1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                covered by this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust
                2006-J2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

             2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
                which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
                to the period covered by this report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
                other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for
                the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
                Act periodic reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
                servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                respects; and

             5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
                attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
                in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
                and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as
                an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
                this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described
                in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
                10-K.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee, National City Mortgage Co. and
             Third Federal Savings & Loan Association.

         Date: March 27, 2007


             /s/ Steve Bailey
             -----------------------
             Steve Bailey
             Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 05, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 05, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0232. DAVID SMITH v. BELINDA SMITH.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

16A1654
Exhibit 32


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maui Land & Pineapple
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, David C. Cole
and Fred W. Rickert, respectively, the Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



/S/ DAVID C. COLE
David C. Cole
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer



/S/ FRED W. RICKERT
Fred W. Rickert
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


August 13, 2004
Date
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1370

To require the Secretary of Defense to retire all land-based intercontinental

ballistic missiles before October 1, 1997.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. WOFFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Defense to retire all land-based

intercontinental ballistic missiles before October 1, 1997.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETIREMENT OF ALL LAND BASED ICBMS.

4 The Secretary of Defense shall retire all land-based

5 intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States be6 fore October 1, 1997.

Æ
No. 12-6540.

#### Mishall *v.*Warren, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of EZ English Online Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Andrea Molnar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Andrea Molnar                                              | 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    |                                                                | 
|    | Andrea Molnar,                                                 | 
|    | President, Chief Executive
      Officer,                      | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer | 
|    |                                                                | 
|    | December 6, 2006                                               | 

---