alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 45,339 | 47,614
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 50,909 | 51,105 | 50,462 | 50,923 | 54,024 | 54,931 | 55,733 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 50,503 | 50,273 | 50,360 | 49,829 | 49,870 | 49,766 | 49,557 | 51,439 | 51,198 | 51,113
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 49,057 | 46,693 | 47,119 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### T.W., Mother of C.E.P., and T.D.C., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 18, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Gary Sanders, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Kelly, III, the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    EDWARD J. KELLY, IIIEdward J. Kelly, III Chief
Executive Officer





Date: November 8, 2002
#### COM. v. WHISNER, P.

1202 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/22/2017

CP-21-CR-0000738-2015

(Cumberland)

Affirmed
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|North Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|North Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 355    | 179   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 147    | 157    | 165    | 177    | 183    | 191    | 198    |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 255    | 204    | 206    | 211    | 210    | 223    | 222    | 205    | 201    | 198   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 192    | 193    | 192    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Henryk Lejkowski, Plaintiff, v John T. Siedlarz, Appellant, and Sarah L. Conway, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 748]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant John T. Siedlarz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated June 26, 2002, which granted the motion of the defendant Sarah L. Conway for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment *792dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Sarah L. Conway is dismissed, as the appellant is not aggrieved by that portion of the order *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, with costs.

In this action arising out of a rear-end collision, the vehicle operated by the plaintiff came to a complete stop behind the vehicle operated by the defendant Sarah L. Conway, without coming into contact with Conway’s vehicle. Thereafter, the vehicle operated by the plaintiff was struck from the rear by the vehicle operated by the defendant John T. Siedlarz.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of Conway’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing all cross claims insofar as asserted against her. Under the circumstances of this case, any purported negligence by Conway was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries *(see Elezovic v Harrison,*292 AD2d 416, 417 [2002]; *Bournazos v Malfitano,*275 AD2d 437, 438 [2000]; *Smith v Cafiero,*203 AD2d 355, 356 [1994] ; *see also Rzepecki v Yauch,*277 AD2d 984, 985 [2000]; *Robinson v Day,*265 AD2d 916, 917-918 [1999]; *Lester v Chmaj,*251 AD2d 1069, 1070 [1998]), or a proximate cause of the rear-end collision between Siedlarz and the plaintiff *(see McNeill v Sandiford,*270 AD2d 467 [2000]; *Ner v Celis,*245 AD2d 278, 279 [1997]; *Lehmann v Sheaves,*231 AD2d 687, 688 [1996]; *Chamberlin v Suffolk County Labor Dept.,*221 AD2d 580, 581 [1995] ). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### MacKendy STRACHAN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1002

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 08, 2017

L.T. NO.: 12-17516

Denied.
#### Billy Joe ELLIS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13060.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 1950.

T. Haller Jackson, Jr., Shreveport, La., for appellant.

Malcolm E. Lafargue, U. S. Atty., Wm. J. Fleniken, Asst. U. S. Atty., Shreveport, La., for appellee.

' Before HOLMES, WALLER, and BOR-AH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1514

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. Shawn Michael Aiello, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 14, 2011 Filed: February 9, 2012

___________ Before RILEY, Chief Judge, BEAM, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shawn Aiello appeals his conviction and mandatory minimum fifteen-year sentence, following a guilty plea, to being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) & 924(e). After pleading guilty, Aie llo unsuccessfully argued to the district court 1 at sentencing that his prosecution under § 922(g) violated his Second Amendment right to keep a nd bear arms, citing District of Columbia v. Heller , 554 U.S. 570 (2008), and McDonald v. City of Chicago , 130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010). He renews this argument on appeal. To the exte nt, as the government urges, that Aiello's

1 The Honorable Rodney W. Si ppel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.briefing can be read to present an "as applied" challenge to § 922(g), it is barred by the appellate waiver of a ll non-jurisdictional issues in his plea agreement. See United States v. Joos , 638 F.3d 581, 586 (8th Cir. 2011) (holding that "as applied" constitutional challenges to statutes are non-jurisdictional), cert. denied , 2012 WL 171246 (U.S. Jan. 23, 2012). To the extent, as Aiello urges, that he brings a facial challenge to § 922(g), his arguments are fo reclosed by our circuit precedent. Seeid. (noting that we have previously uphe ld § 922(g) against a Second Amendment challenge). We affirm.

______________________________

-2-
=====================================================================

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

										

FORM 10-Q/A

 /X / Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

/ / Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

For the period from  to

Commission File Number 0-6890

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreements Adopte d b

yth e Traffi c Conference s of tti e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2009-033 1

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENTS

B Y TH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR TASSOCIATIO N lAI AAUKbbMt N 1 AFHROVli U & IMMUNIZK U . DOCKETQ%l'O l - 0 33 1 ACTION DAT E j+JfJ- - "

3 2- . lu! I Thi s approval an dgran t

o f antitrus t immunity i s subject , wher e applicable , t o condition s previousl y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv e after 7 day s unles s apetitio n i s file dunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r

arevie w i s undertake n o n th e Department' s ow n motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dth e availability o f th e abovrClpcedure , th%2Uia.vjpAja di n 1 4 CF R303.4 2 i s waived .

I 

### 1 04 Deceml)e r 200 9 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Douglas E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e Presiden t - Nort h America Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n lAT AWashington , 60 1 Pennsylvani a Avenue , N.W . Suit e 30 0 - Nort h Buildin g Washingto n D C 2000 4
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|South Carolina Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|South Carolina Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 443,093 | 460,141 | 473,799
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 489,340 | 501,161 | 508,686 | 516,362 | 527,008 | 541,523 | 554,953 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 570,797 | 576,594 | 583,633 | 593,286 | 605,644 | 641,163 | 655,996 | 651,840 | 693,989 | 714,218
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 734,890 | 758,356 | 783,826 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2016
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Angelo Napolitano, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: May 4, 2016                                                                    | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                      | 
|                                                                                      | 
|/s/  Angelo Napolitano                                                                | 
|Angelo Napolitano
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer | 





A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc.
and will be returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1475 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1475

To revise the boundaries of the Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 21 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To revise the boundaries of the Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hagerman Fossil Beds National 
Monument Boundary Revision Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY REVISION.

    Section 302(a) of the Arizona-Idaho Conservation Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4571) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) The Secretary'' and inserting 
        ``(a)(1) The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The Secretary is authorized to acquire from willing sellers, 
by donation, with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange, not more 
than 65 acres outside the boundary depicted on the map referred to in 
section 301 for the purpose of developing the land and operating 
research, information, interpretive, and administrative facilities. 
Lands acquired and facilities developed under this paragraph shall be 
administered by the Secretary as part of the monument. The boundary of 
the monument shall be modified to include the lands added under this 
paragraph as a noncontiguous parcel.''.

                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; Opinion issued February 13, 2013

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-01368-CV

DANIEL HERNANDEZ AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES 

CORPORATION, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1998-3, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-02876-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. Appellants appeal

from the trial court’s judgment awarding possession of property to appellee. Appellee informs 

the Court that it obtained a writ of possession and has been given possession of the property. 

Appellants did not file a response to the motion to dismiss.

A case becomes moot if, at any stage during the proceedings, a controversy ceases to 

exist between the parties. Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2001). The purpose of a 

forcible detainer action is to obtain immediate possession of property. See Scott v. Hewitt, 127 

Tex. 31, 35, 90 S.W.2d 816, 818-19 (1936). A judgment of possession in a forcible detainer 

action determines the right of immediate possession and is not intended to be a final 
2

determination of whether the eviction is wrongful. See Marshall v. Housing Auth. of the City of 

San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006). 

Appellants failed to supersede the trial court’s judgment. The judgment has been 

executed on and appellee is now in possession of the property. The issue of possession is no 

longer in controversy. Accordingly, we grant appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

121368F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
3

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DANIEL HERNANDEZ AND ALL 

OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellants

No. 05-12-01368-CV V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA AS 

TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET 

SECURITIES CORPORATION, 

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 1998-3, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-11-02876-A.

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Lang-Miers and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, NA as Trustee for Structured Asset 

Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1998-3, recover its costs of 

the appeal from appellants, Daniel Hernandez and All Other Occupants. 

Judgment entered February 13, 2013.

/Carolyn Wright/

CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE