alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 98-NM-21-AD; Amendment 39-10425; AD 97-25-11R1]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B16 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of a direct final 
rule published on March 27, 1998 which revised an existing 
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model 
CL-600-2B16 series airplanes, that currently requires disabling the 
remote fuel/defuel panel in the cockpit; and provides for an optional 
modification of the remote fuel/defuel panel, which would terminate the 
requirement to disable the panel. The direct final rule amendment 
reduces the applicability of the existing AD. The direct final rule 
amendment was prompted by reports of in-flight failure of the panel 
that resulted when a circuit breaker on a battery bus opened due to 
insufficient current flow capacity. The actions specified in this AD 
are intended to prevent the circuit breakers from opening during 
flight, which could result in irreversible loss of engine indicating 
and fuel quantity systems in the cockpit.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 14804 is effective on 
June 25, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brett Portwood, Aerospace Engineer, 
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130L, FAA, Transport Airplane 
Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount 
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5350; fax 
(562) 627-5210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published the direct final rule with 
request for comments in the Federal Register on March 27, 1998 (63 FR 
14804). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-
controversial rule where the FAA anticipates that there will be no 
adverse public comment. The direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, was received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 25, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that this final rule will become 
effective on that date, with the airworthiness directive (AD) number 
shown at the beginning of this document.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 5, 1998.
John J. Hickey,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-12513 Filed 5-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-556

In Re: LENORE D. FORT,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-542-5-BR2)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lenore D. Fort, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lenore D. Fort filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

requesting this court to direct the district court to issue a

scheduling order, compel discovery, vacate a protective order,

vacate an order for an extension of time, take judicial notice of

a motion filed by Fort, follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to act on Fort's various motions.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976). Mandamus relief is available only if there are no other

means by which the relief sought could be granted. See In re Beard,

811 F.2d 818, 827 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, the party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that she has "no

other adequate means" to attain the relief she desires and that her

right to such relief is "clear and indisputable." See Allied Chem.

Corp. v. Diaflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980) (citations omitted).

Fort's petition does not present extraordinary circumstances

that require granting relief. She fails to show that her right to

relief is clear and indisputable and that she has no other means of

relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ARTHUR CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1414

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 27, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
No. 12-6819.

#### Santiago *v.*Fields et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Merck &
Co., Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 7, 2004
    
    
    
    /s/ Judy C. LewentName:
    
    Judy C. LewentTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President & Chief Financial OfficerPresident, Human Health Asia
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8      | 7      | 9     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 13     | 13     | 16     | 18     | 38     | 27     | 28     | 26     | 22    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 20     | 11     | 11     | 9      | 9      | 10     | 12     | 5      | 5      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 4      | 4      | 3      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 85-6639.

#### Tornero *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOILDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
NOVEMBER 1, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANNCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          39,883
<SECURITIES>                                    12,294
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,523
<INVENTORY>                                    744,124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,008
<PP&E>                                       1,238,238
<DEPRECIATION>                                 456,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,266,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,932
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,410
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,569,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,266,749
<SALES>                                      2,065,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,129,933
<CGS>                                        1,500,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,500,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               536,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,909,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             57,366
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,366
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
        

</TABLE>
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Wyoming Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Wyoming Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 113,175 | 112,126 | 113,129
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 113,598 | 113,463 | 114,793 | 116,027 | 117,385 | 119,544 | 131,910 | 125,740 | 127,324 | 127,750
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 129,274 | 129,897 | 133,445 | 135,441 | 137,434 | 140,013 | 142,385 | 143,644 | 152,439 | 153,062
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 153,852 | 155,181 | 157,226 | 158,889 | 160,896 | 159,925 | 164,454 | 165,351 | 166,140 | 167,597
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 169,238 | 170,833 | 172,035 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6765.

#### Wilder *v.*Michigan.

Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Arkansas Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Arkansas Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 198, UNITED RUBBER, CORK, LINOLEUM AND PLASTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA, C.I.O.

No. 14170.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 27, 1950.

David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Robert E. Shuff, Akron, Ohio, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on stipulation filed with Board, and Petition for Enforcement
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Educational Research Policy and Priorities Board; 
Education.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the National Educational Research Policy and 
Priorities Board. Notice of this meeting is required under Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. This document is 
intended to notify the general public of their opportunity to attend 
the meeting.

DATES: June 18 and 19, 1998.

TIME: June 18, 2:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.; June 19, 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

LOCATION: Room 100, 80 F St., NW., Washington, DC 20208-7564.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thelma Leenhouts, Designated Federal Official, National Educational 
Research Policy and Priorities Board, Washington, DC 20208-7564. Tel.: 
(202) 219-2065; fax: (202) 219-1528; e-mail: Thelma L<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91f4f4fff9fee4e5e2d1f4f5bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5d0d0dbdddac0c1c6f5d0d19bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>, 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e101b0c0e0e1c3e1b1a50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aec0cbdcdedecceecbca80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Educational Research Policy and 
Priorities Board is authorized by Section 921 of the Educational 
Research, Development, Dissemination, and Improvement Act of 1994. The 
Board works collaboratively with the Assistant Secretary for the Office 
of Educational Research and Improvement to forge a national consensus 
with respect to a long-term agenda for educational research, 
development, and dissemination, and to provide advice and assistance to 
the Assistant Secretary in administering the duties of the Office. The 
meeting is open to the public. On June 18, the Board will hear reports 
from its Committee on Research, Development, and Dissemination, and 
receive a briefing about the ERIC Clearinghouse competition. On June 
19, the Board will hear reports from the National Research Institutes 
of the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, and from its 
Program and Standards Committees. A final agenda will be available from 
the Board office on June 10, 1998.
    Records are kept of all Board proceedings and are available for 
public inspection at the office of the National Educational Research 
Policy and Priorities Board, Suite 100, 80 F St., NW., Washington, DC 
20208-7564.

    Dated: May 8, 1998.
Eve M. Bither,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-12521 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 12-6720.

#### McCarthy *v.*Sosnick et al.

Ct. App. Mich. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.