alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                             
|Florida Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Sectors by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                             
|Florida Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Commercial Sectors by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 14.71  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 11.59  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,403  | 1,449 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,311  | 1,628  | 1,525  | 2,269  | 1,322  | 1,702  | 1,710  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,388  | 2,445  | 2,651  | 2,291  | 2,638  | 1,959  | 2,040  | 1,677  | 1,723  | 1,734 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,761  | 1,905  | 1,885  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19911-19912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 2354-018-GA]


Georgia Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

April 16, 1998.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA was

[[Page 19912]]

prepared for an application filed by the Georgia Power Company on 
January 29, 1998, requesting the Commission's authorization to permit 
the Clayton-Rabun County Water Authority (Authority) to increase its 
water withdrawal from Lake Rabun reservoir for municipal water supply 
from 806,000 gallons per day (gpd) currently to 2.0 million gpd.
    The EA evaluates the environmental impacts that would result from 
permitting the Authority to increase its water withdrawal from Lake 
Rabun reservoir, as discussed above. Existing pumps and water treatment 
facilities at the site are able to accommodate this increased water 
withdrawal; consequently, the proposed action would not require any new 
construction activity.
    The EA finds that approval of the application would not constitute 
a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human 
environment.
    The EA was written by staff in the Office of Hydropower Licensing, 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Copies of the EA can be viewed at 
the Commission's Reference and Information Center, Room 2A, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Copies also may be obtained by 
calling the EA coordinator, Jim Haimes, at (202) 219-2780.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10614 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-IM3
                  ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-IM3


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                               Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                               Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Exhibit 12.2

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Mellon Financial Corporation

and its subsidiaries



|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |   |               |  |   |              |  |   |              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ------------- |  | - | ------------ |  | - | -------------
|                                                                                                                                                                   |  |   | Quarter ended
|(dollar amounts in millions)                                                                                                                                       |  |   | March 31,2007 |  |   | Dec. 31,2006 |  |   | March 31,2006
|Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes                                                                                                |  | $ | 354           |  | $ | 325          |  | $ | 284          
|Fixed charges: interest expense (excluding interest on deposits), one-third of rental expense net of
income from subleases and amortization of debt issuance costs |  |   | 110           |  |   | 103          |  |   | 87           
|Total earnings (as defined), excluding interest on deposits                                                                                                        |  |   | 464           |  |   | 428          |  |   | 371          
|Interest on deposits                                                                                                                                               |  |   | 176           |  |   | 192          |  |   | 121          
|Total earnings (as defined)                                                                                                                                        |  | $ | 640           |  | $ | 620          |  | $ | 492          
|Ratio of earnings (as defined) to fixed charges:                                                                                                                   |  |   |               |  |   |              |  |   |              
|Excluding interest on deposits                                                                                                                                     |  |   | 4.21          |  |   | 4.16         |  |   | 4.26         
|Including interest on deposits                                                                                                                                     |  |   | 2.24          |  |   | 2.10         |  |   | 2.37
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Alabama Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Alabama Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1,129  | 1,178  | 1,249  | 1,303  | 1,564  | 1,634  | 1,875 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3,710  | 3,720  | 4,477  | 4,453  | 3,747  | 3,806  | 2,827  | 2,468  | 2,391  | 5,336 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,377  | 3,491  | 4,148  | 3,293  | 3,914  | 3,740  | 6,028  | 6,269  | 6,858  | 6,470 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,441  | 6,939  | 6,616  | 6,804  | 6,462  | 6,436  | 6,344  | 5,372  | 4,943  | 5,240 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,585  | 4,987  | 5,012  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-286.

#### Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America et al. *v.*CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-24-00235-CR 

 

EX PARTE KENNON SHAW 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

July 23, 2024 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. 

Kennon Shaw, proceeding pro se, filed a “Petition for Writ of Mandamus Brief,”

and other attached documents, in this Court seeking post-conviction relief from his final

felony conviction. See Shaw v. State, No. 07-23-00305-CR, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 2309, 

at *3 (Tex. App.—Amarillo Apr. 2, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) 

(affirming Shaw’s murder conviction). We construe the documents as an application for 

writ of habeas corpus.

Intermediate courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in 

criminal law matters. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas 

jurisdiction of intermediate appellate courts to civil cases); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 
2

586, 588–89 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). That jurisdiction 

instead rests with the Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the county courts. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05; Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d at 588. Only

the Court of Criminal Appeals has authority to grant post-conviction habeas relief in felony 

cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); Ex parte Alexander, 685 

S.W.2d 57, 60 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

For these reasons, we dismiss Shaw’s application for writ of habeas corpus for 

want of jurisdiction.1,2

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

1 Shaw may be entitled to habeas relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus with the 

clerk of the court in which the conviction being challenged was obtained, returnable to the Court of Criminal 

Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07.

2 To the extent that Shaw seeks mandamus relief, we note that the documents he filed fail to meet 

the requirements of a petition for writ of mandamus as, inter alia, they are not accompanied by a record. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (delineating the required form and contents for a petition for writ of mandamus), 

52.7 (requiring relator to file a certified or sworn copy of every document material to the claim for relief that 

was filed in the underlying proceeding). Without a mandamus record, we cannot determine whether 

mandamus relief is warranted. See In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam) (“Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy granted only when the relator shows that 

the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.”). For this reason, we 

also deny Shaw any mandamus relief.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: L.A.L.P., a Minor

687 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

CP-51-DP-0002009-2012

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
```

[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26445-26446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-18]

Revocation of Class D Airspace, Lubbock Reese AFB, TX, and 
Revision of Class E Airspace, Lubbock, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26446]]

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revokes Class D airspace at Lubbock Reese AFB, TX, and revises 
Class E airspance at Lubbock, TX.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 11989 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 
817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 12, 1998 
(63 FR 11989). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 5, 1998.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12711 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60719 Conference Calendar

__________________ CEDRIC TURNIPSEED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus TIMOTHY R. BALDUCCI, Attorney; LAWRENCE LITTLE, District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:95-CV-149-D-A - - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Cedric Turnipseed appeals from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint. He argues that he was denied the right to a trial and challenges the propriety of his plea agreement. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. AFFIRMED.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 12, 2013 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00881-CV IN RE DAVID CHUMBLEY, Relator On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1151537

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is relator’s petition for wr it of mandamus naming the district clerk as respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have mandamu s jurisdiction over the district clerk. See T EX
. G OV = T C ODE A NN
. ' 22.221 (West 2010). Accordingly, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

130881F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE