alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35 (a)
Thornburg 2006-1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1.   A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period. [If any material failure, specify such
failure and its nature and status.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th
day of February 2007.

By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name:  Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
       Director of Loan Administration
No. 12-7013.

#### Gutierrez-Perez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History: Annual                                    
|View History: Annual                                    
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Wyoming Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Wyoming Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3   | Year-4   | Year-5   | Year-6   | Year-7   | Year-8   | Year-9  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | --------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |          |          |          |          | 6,040    | 117,106  | 97,457  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 39,915  | -42,255 | 7,242   | -3,641   | 12,169   | -1,680   | -27,044  | -100,354 | -39,665  | 16,347  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -19,489 | -67,441 | -74,768 | -112,025 | -126,945 | -195,886 | -154,378 | -126,150 | -159,483 | -136,605
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -18,887 | -8,712  | 20,092  |          |          |          |          |          |          |         
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANIBAL GONZALEZ,

Appellant,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, as Trustee of UPLAND 

MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST A,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1192

[December 30, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barry J. Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 16-

20364.

Ricardo Corona, Ricardo M. Corona and Yung Truong of Corona Law 

Firm, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Christian J. Gendreau of Storey Law Group, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., WARNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: J.W., a minor, Appeal of: J.W.

389 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/30/2017

CP-02-AP-0000203-2016

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
#### Joseph PIRELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Don SMITH, et. al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0837

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 19, 2017

L.T. NO.: 10-54535

Dismissed.
No. 12-6381.

#### Sharp *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11885]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service

30 CFR Part 203

RIN 1010-AC13


Royalty Relief for Producing Leases and Certain Existing Leases 
in Deep Water

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: MMS published in the Federal Register of Friday, January 16, 
1998 (63 FR 2605), a final rule establishing conditions for reducing 
royalties on producing leases; providing for suspensions of royalty 
payments on certain deep water leases issued as the result of lease 
sales held before November 28, 1995; and describing the information 
required for a complete application for royalty relief. This document 
makes corrections to the final rule.

DATES: This correction is effective February 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Marshall Rose, Chief, Economics Division, at (703) 787-1536.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    1. On Page 2616 in the first column the title Subpart A--General 
Requirements is corrected to read Subpart A--General Provisions.
    2. On page 2622 in the second column, in Sec. 203.74(b)(2) on the 
fifth line ``most recently approved'' is corrected to read ``most 
recent, complete'' in Sec. 203.74(c) beginning on the seventh line 
``most recently approved'' is corrected to read ``most recent, 
complete.''

    Dated: April 27, 1998.
E.P. Danenberger,
Chief, Engineering and Operations Division.
[FR Doc. 98-11885 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
No. 12-6697.

#### Towbridge *v.*Tacker et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12736]



[[Page 26449]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ASW-12]


Revision of Class E Airspace; Muskogee, OK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
which revises Class E airspace at Muskogee, OK.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 12628 is 
effective 0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald J. Day, Airspace Branch, Air 
Traffic Division, Southwest Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Fort Worth, TX 76193-0520, telephone: 817-222-5593.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 
(63 FR 12628). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effect on June 18, 1988. No adverse comments were received, and 
thus this action confirms that this direct final rule will be effective 
on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 5, 1998.
Albert L. Viselli,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-12736 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Robert Lee, Respondent, v Stunt Sportswear USA, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[770 NYS2d 8]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered January 17, 2003, which granted plaintiffs motion to vacate the dismissal of his action under index number 114983/96 (Action No. 1), which was consolidated with another action defendant Stunt Sportswear USA had brought against plaintiff under index number 606288/97 (Action No. 2), restored the consolidated action to active status, and denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and *262Justice, entered January 17, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s action under index number 602280/02 (Action No. 3), unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, on the ground that there is another action pending between the parties.

These three actions arise out of an agreement whereby Stunt Sportswear USA purchased plaintiffs interest in its import and distribution business. In Action No. 1, plaintiff sought to enforce the agreement. In Action No. 2, Stunt Sportswear USA asserted claims against plaintiff in connection with his alleged breach of noncompetition and nondisclosure covenants. In Action No. 3, brought after the dismissal of the consolidated Actions Nos. 1 and 2, plaintiff asserts causes of action identical to those in the second amended complaint of Action No. 1.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated action was predicated on plaintiffs failure to comply with a conditional order of dismissal, directing him to file a note of issue by August 17, 2001. However, prior to the issuance of the order dismissing the action, the court issued an intervening preliminary conference order directing plaintiff to file a note of issue by September 30, 2001, clearly superseding the earlier conditional order of dismissal *(see Anzalone v Pan-Am Equities,*271 AD2d 307, 308 [2000]). Plaintiff was therefore not in default of the conditional order, and the action was properly restored.

Since the consolidated action is sub judice, defendants cannot assert res judicata as a bar to the maintenance of Action No. 3. However, we exercise our discretion to dismiss that action on the ground that there is another action pending between the parties, arising out of the same transaction and involving the same claims (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4.31   | 3.34   | 4.25   | 4.61   | 4.19   | 2.71   | 1.54   | 3.92   | 4.01   | 4.50  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.51   | 6.32   | 3.88   | 6.84   | 8.61   | 10.21  | 11.11  | 8.25   | 11.32  | 8.69  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.84   | 8.08   | 6.17   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 4,838  | 4,402  | 4,505  | 1,277  | 4,954  | 3,190  | 4,679  | 3,109  | 5,391  | 6,453 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,714  | 5,974  | 3,594  | 6,330  | 6,167  | 3,746  | 7,990  | 1,686  | 1,233  | 1,295 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 376    | 1,368  | 1,142  | 3,474  | 2,806  | 2,331  | 1,700  | 3,023  | 2,845  | 2,502 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,059  | 2,257  | 918    | 2,515  | 3,686  | 2,414  | 1,560  | 1,329  | 3,001  | 2,665 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,358  | 1,230  | 1,664  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 21




                         24HOLDINGS INC. - SUBSIDIARIES

1.  Active Subsidiaries
    -------------------

                  Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of 24Holdings Inc.:
                  ---------------------------------------------

                            24STORE (Europe) Limited*

                                24Mobile Limited*

             Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of 24STORE (Europe) Limited:
             ------------------------------------------------------

                              LapLand (UK) Limited*

                             Mobile Planet Limited*

                              Cyberia (UK) Limited*


2.  Inactive Subsidiaries (all of which have either been dissolved or are in
    the process of being dissolved)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of 24STORE (Europe) Limited:
             ------------------------------------------------------

                                  24STORE AB**

                               24STORE Sweden AB**

                            InfiniCom Consulting AB**

                       InfiniCom Electronic Commerce AB**

                     Wholly Owned Subsidiary of 24STORE AB:
                     --------------------------------------

                                    24IT AB**



*Incorporated in the United Kingdom
**Incorporated in Sweden
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Wyoming Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Wyoming Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 93.7   | 92.8   | 0.9    | 96.1  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 91.9   | 92.6   | 52.5   | 55.1   | 54.6   | 55.9   | 55.6   | 54.0   | 77.3   | 77.8  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 75.4   | 75.6   | 75.3   | 73.8   | 72.9   | 73.0   | 72.8   | 71.9   | 70.5   | 69.9  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 69.6   | 68.7   | 68.1   | 67.3   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00083-CR

Tarra SCHWARTZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-0232-CR-C

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on August 25, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Walter Carl EWING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14172.

United. States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 13, 1950.

Walter Carl Ewing, pro se.

Drake Watson, United States Attorney, and William J. Costello, Assistant United States Attorney, St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court docketed and dismissed, on motion of appellee.
#### Anne Marie PONS, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0310

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 7, 2017

L.T. NO.: 14-19478

Dismissed.