alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward Robert INGLETON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Case No. 5D17-3645

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Opinion filed January 5, 2018

Edward Robert Ingleton, Cross City, pro se. ' ’

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General Tallahassee, and, Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 26, 2016 order denying Petitioner’s pro se motion for post-conviction relief, filed in Case Nos. 1993-CF-14914-A and 1994-CF-14408-A, in the Circuit Court in and for Brevard County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1,517  | 6,194  | 848    | 174    | 7,259  | 56,844 | 45,180 | 40,805 | 42,965
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 44,853 | 52,164 | 63,314 | 71,770 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 99.1

            ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.19

                      Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc.
             Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R11

            I, John P. Grazer, hereby certify that I am a duly appointed
Executive Vice President of Ameriquest Mortgage Company (the "Master Servicer"),
and further certify as follows:

            1. This certification is being made pursuant to the terms of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2005 (the "Agreement"),
among Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., as depositor, the Master Servicer and
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

            2. I have reviewed the activities of the Master Servicer during the
preceding year and the Master Servicer's performance under the Agreement and to
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement throughout the year.

            Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set
forth in the Agreement.

Dated: 3/14/06
<PAGE>

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ John P. Grazer
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: John P. Grazer
                                                Title: Executive Vice President


            I, Denise Apicella, an Assistant Secretary of the Master Servicer,
hereby certify that John P. Grazer is a duly elected, qualified, and acting
Executive Vice President of the Master Servicer and that the signature appearing
above is his genuine signature.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as
of 3/14/06.

                                                By: /s/ Denise Apicella
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                Name: Denise Apicella
                                                Title: Assistant Secretary
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Loren L. McFarland, Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Treasurer of Mentor Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordancewith 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)        theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; as amended; and

(2)       information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 7, 2005

/s/LOREN L. MCFARLAND
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00138

- CV

CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS BY AND THROUGH THE CAMERON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT v. ERIC GARZA, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY

AS SHERIFF OF CAMERON COUNTY

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- DCL

- 02243

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 1, 2021
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-127]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Addition to Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee has received a proposal to add to the 
Procurement List a service to be furnished by nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED ON OR BEFORE: February 4, 1998.

ADDRESS: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Crystal Gateway 3, Suite 310, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-4302.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 47(a) (2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the 
possible impact of the proposed actions.

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, all entities of 
the Federal Government (except as otherwise indicated) will be required 
to procure the service listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organizations that will furnish the service to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
48c) in connection with the service proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List. Comments on this certification are invited. 
Commenters should identify the statement(s) underlying the 
certification on which they are providing additional information.
    The following service has been proposed for addition to Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed: Laundry Service, 
Naval Hospital, San Diego, California, NPA: Job Options, Inc., San 
Diego, California.
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-127 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Intelligence Agency, Science and Technology Advisory 
Board Closed Panel Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Intelligence Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (d) of Section 10 of 
Public Law 92-463, as amended by Section 5 of Public Law 94-409, notice 
is hereby given that a closed meeting of the DIA Science and Technology 
Advisory Board has been scheduled as follows.

DATES: 20 and 21 May 1998 (800am to 1600pm).

ADDRESSES: The Defense Intelligence Agency, Bolling AFB, Washington, DC 
20340-5100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maj Michael W. Lamb, USAF, Executive Secretary, DIA Science and 
Technology Advisory Board, Washington, DC 20340-1328 (202) 231-4930.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The entire meeting is devoted to the 
discussion of classified information as defined in Section 552b(c)(I), 
Title 5 of the U.S. Code and therefore will be closed to the public. 
The Board will receive briefings on and discuss several current 
critical intelligence issues and advise the Director, DIA, on related 
scientific and technical matters.

    Dated: May 6, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-12685 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
No. 12-6869.

#### Cardenas *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

October 5, 1994.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 1457) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act to increase authorization for appropriation to

compensate Aleut villages for church property lost, damaged,

or destroyed during World War II’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

1 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATIONS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 205(d)(4) of the Aleutian

3 and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act (50 U.S.C. App.

4 1989c–4(d)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘$1,400,000’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘$4,700,000’’.

6 (b) FUND.—If the Fund referred to in section 205(a)

7 of the Aleutian and Pribilof Islands Restitution Act (50

8 U.S.C. App. 1989c–4(a)) has been terminated pursuant to

9 section 203(d) of such Act (50 U.S.C. App. 1989c–2(d)),

10 upon the appropriation of additional funds pursuant to

11 this Act, the Fund shall be reestablished.

12 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—The funds appropriated pursu13 ant to this Act shall be used solely for the renovation, re-
2

S 1457 EAH

1 placement, and restoration of Church property lost, dam2 aged, or destroyed during World War II.

Attest:

Clerk.

103D CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1457

AMENDMENT
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Kenai, AK Exports to Taiwan Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Kenai, AK Exports to Taiwan Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May   | Jun   | Jul | Aug | Sep   | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | --- | ----- | --- | --- | ---
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     | 2,748 | 2,754 |     |     | 2,755 |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-13058]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, as amended by Public Law 104-13; 
Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority.

ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The proposed information collection described below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, 
as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public 
comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). 
Requests for information, including copies of the information 
collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to 
the Agency Clearance Officer: Wilma H. McCauley, Tennessee Valley 
Authority, 1101 Market Street (WR 4Q), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-
2801; (423) 751-2523.
    Comments should be sent to the Agency Clearance Officer no later 
than July 17, 1998.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Title of Information Collection: TVA Aquatic Plant Management.
    Frequency of Use: On occasion.
    Type of Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Small Businesses or Organizations Affected: No.
    Federal Budget Functional Category Code: 452.
    Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 2,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 400.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours Per Response: .2.
    Need For and Use of Information: TVA committed to involving the 
public in developing plans for managing aquatic plants in individual 
TVA lakes under a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement completed 
in August 1993. This proposed survey will provide a mechanism for 
obtaining input into this planning process from a representative sample 
of people living near each lake. The information obtained from the 
survey will be factored into the development of aquatic plant 
management plans for mainstream Tennessee River lakes.
William S. Moore,
Senior Manager, Administrative Services.
[FR Doc. 98-13058 Filed 5-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
No. 12-525.

#### China Terminal & Electric Corp. et al. *v.*Willemsen, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Willemsen, et al.

Sup. Ct. Ore. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7309.

#### Wilson v. New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
413 P.2d 860

#### R. D. "Dick" SEARLES, Appellant, v. Joseph C. HALDIMAN, Jr., and Acme Real Estate and Development, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Appellee.

No. 1 CA-CIV 124.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

May 9, 1966.

Burns & Ferrin, by S. Paul Ferrin, Phoenix, for appellant.

Johnson & Shaw, by Marvin Johnson, Phoenix, for appellees.

CAMERON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion to set aside a default.

Plaintiff filed a complaint in libel on 13 August, 1964. Copies of the summons and complaint were personally served upon the defendant, Joseph C. Haldiman, Jr., individually and as President of the Acme Real Estate and Development, Inc., on the same day. Affidavit on default and entry of default was filed 22 September, 1964, and motion to set aside default was filed by the defendants 15 October, 1964. The minute entry of 6 November, 1964, reads as follows:

> “This matter having been submitted for ruling without argument, and the court being fully advised in the premises,

> “IT IS ORDERED granting defendant’s motion to set aside default.”

Although the parties have not questioned our jurisdiction, we must, nevertheless, pass upon our jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Stevens v. Mehagian’s Home Furnishings, Inc., 90 Ariz. 42, 365 P.2d 208 (1961), Bloch v. Bentfield, 1 Ariz.App. 412, 403 P.2d 559 (1965), Christian v. Cotten, 1 Ariz.App. 421, 403 P.2d 825 (1965), Ginn v. Superior Court, 1 Ariz.App. 455, 404 P.2d 721 (1965).

 Generally, the power of this Court to review actions of the Superior Court is limited by 12-2101 A.R.S., and 12-120.21 A.R.S. State v. Mileham, 1 Ariz.App. 67, 399 P.2d 688 (1965). In the instant case, neither this Court nor the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order granting or denying a motion to set aside an entry of default. Our Supreme Court has stated:

> “After a motion to set aside entry of default had been denied it remains for the trial court to conduct hearings, when appropriate, to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of *any*averment, and to enter judgment upon the default. Ariz.R.Civ.Proc. 55(b), 16 A.R.S. An order denying a motion to set aside default entered by the clerk of the superior court is in no sense a final judgment. Nor does such order determine the action so as to prevent entry of judgment upon the default. Therefore, the order is not appealable.” Rueda v. *295Galvez, 94 Ariz. 131, 132, 133, 382 P.2d 239, 240 (1963).

And:

> “If the question of whether the order setting aside the entry of default had been raised in the original opinion, this court would have decided it. If it is not an appealable order, the inadvertent acceptance of this appeal does not bar the court from refusing subsequent appeals in other cases involving this situation.” Overson v. Martin, 90 Ariz. 151, 153, 367 P.2d 203, 205 (1961).

The appeal is dismissed.

STEVENS, C. J., and DONOFRIO, J., concur.
No. 12-6896.

#### Coleman *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Embarq Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas
A. Gerke, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: February 29, 2008 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas A. Gerke                          
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Thomas A. Gerke                              
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer