alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,772  | 2,689  | 2,877 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,889  | 2,840  | 2,859  | 2,912  | 2,853  | 2,845  | 2,843  | 2,531  | 3,295  | 3,040 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,821  | 3,403  | 3,438  | 3,367  | 3,283  | 2,855  | 2,811  | 2,822  | 2,920  | 2,618 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,731  | 2,733  | 2,872  | 2,958  | 3,062  | 3,050  | 3,103  | 2,943  | 3,246  | 3,228 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,228  | 3,153  | 3,224  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
Exhibit 32

MASCO CORPORATION

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the

United States Code

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Masco Corporation Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Timothy Wadhams, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John G. Sznewajs,
the Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, of Masco Corporation, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Masco Corporation.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2012 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Timothy Wadhams                  
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Timothy Wadhams                      
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |  |  |        |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2012 |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ John G. Sznewajs                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | John G. Sznewajs                                     
|                     |  |  |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
1

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Southern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2445

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Mathias Pizano, * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

Submitted: September 5, 2007

Filed: October 4, 2007

___________

Before BYE, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Mathias Pizano guilty of conspiring to launder money, conspiring

to distribute cocaine and marijuana, making false statements to a financial institution,

and engaging in transactions in criminally derived property. We previously vacated

his sentence and remanded for the district court1

 to give further consideration to

applying an enhancement for sophisticated laundering under U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(3).

See United States v. Pizano, 421 F.3d 707, 733-34 (8th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546

U.S. 1204 (2006). On remand, the district court applied the enhancement and
-2-

sentenced Pizano below the resulting advisory Guidelines range to 420 months in

prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, his counsel has filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and he has filed a pro se

supplemental brief. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

First, it did not violate the Sixth Amendment for the district court to engage in

judicial fact-finding at sentencing by a preponderance of the evidence within an

advisory Guidelines system. See United States v. Sandoval-Rodriguez, 452 F.3d 984,

990-91 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 600 (2006). Second, the district court

properly understood and complied with this court’s instructions to revisit the

sophisticated-laundering enhancement by applying the correct legal standard. See

Pizano, 421 F.3d at 733-34. Third, Pizano has not shown that his sentence is

unreasonable, i.e., that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor that should

have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant

factor, or considered only the appropriate factors but committed a clear error of

judgment in weighing those factors. See United States v. Haack, 403 F.3d 997, 1004

(8th Cir. 2005). Finally, after reviewing the record independently pursuant to Penson

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for

appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we deny

Pizano’s motion for the appointment of new counsel.

______________________________
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis 

NORTHERN OPERATIONS CENTER, INC. 

 AND VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2141-98-4 PER CURIAM 

 JANUARY 19, 1999 

MIRTA CASTANEDA 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (William T. Kennard; Mell, Brownell & Baker, 

on brief), for appellants. Appellants 

submitting on brief. 

 (Metin A. Cay; Swiger & Cay, on brief), for 

appellee. Appellee submitting on brief. 

 Northern Operations Center, Inc. and its insurer 

(hereinafter referred to as "employer") appeal a decision of the 

Workers' Compensation Commission awarding Mirta Castaneda 

temporary total disability benefits beginning December 24, 1996 

and continuing. Employer contends that the commission erred in 

finding that Castaneda's evidence sustained her burden of proving 

continuing disability after June 9, 1997. Finding no error, we 

affirm. 

 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable 

to the prevailing party below. See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. 

Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). 

Factual findings made by the commission will be upheld on appeal 

if supported by credible evidence. See James v. Capitol Steel 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, 

this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

Constr. Co., 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). 

 In ruling that Castaneda sustained her burden of proving 

continuing disability after June 9, 1997, the commission found as 

follows: 

 Dr. [Saul J.] Kaplan's records anticipated 

follow-up examinations every 4-6 weeks, but 

there is no suggestion in those records that 

he anticipated a change in condition and 

disability on such visits. Rather, Dr. 

Kaplan clearly reported on December 24, 1996 

that the claimant could not work until the 

[Reflex Sympathic Dystrophy ("RSD")] problem 

had resolved. His subsequent records 

demonstrate that condition had not resolved. 

 Rather, all reports after that date, 

including the one on April 28, 1997, show 

that Castaneda experienced no change in 

condition over that time. Moreover, this is 

confirmed by the uncontradicted Attending 

Physician's Report issued two days before the 

evidentiary hearing, which cannot be 

summarily rejected or ignored. 

 The evidence proved that Dr. Kaplan, Castaneda's treating 

orthopedic surgeon, consistently and unequivocally opined that 

Castaneda could not return to work until her RSD resolved, which 

it had not. In his October 7, 1997 Attending Physician's Report, 

Dr. Kaplan indicated that Castaneda had been disabled since 

October 7, 1996, and he placed question marks in the blocks on 

the form indicating the "Date able to return to light work" and 

"Date able to return to regular work." Dr. Kaplan's records and 

uncontradicted opinions provide credible evidence to support the 

commission's findings. Thus, those findings are binding and 

conclusive upon us on appeal. See id.

 For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision. 
- 3 - 

 Affirmed.
#### COM. v. HAYWOOD, D.

3644 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/21/2017

CP-5-CR-0000876-2016

(Monroe)

Affirmed
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Virginia Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Virginia Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2      | 2     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 1      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25522-25523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Joshua Tree National Park Advisory Commission; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Joshua Tree National Park Advisory 
Commission (Commission) will be held from 9:00 a.m. (PDT) until 3:00 
p.m. on Saturday, June 13, 1998, at the Helen Gray Center, on 
Whitefeather Drive in the village of Joshua Tree, California. The 
Commission will hear presentations on issues related to the Backcountry 
and Wilderness Management Plan, which serves as an amendment to the 
General Management Plan for Joshua Tree National Park, and will develop 
Commission by-laws.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Pub. L. 103-433, section 
107 to advise the Secretary concerning the development and 
implementation of a new or revised comprehensive management plan for 
Joshua Tree National Park.
    Members of the Commission include:

Mr. Chuck Bell--Planner
Ms. Diane Benson--Town of Yucca Valley
Ms. Cyndie Bransford--Recreational Climbing
Mr. Gary Daigneault--Property Owner
Hon. Kathy Davis--County of San Bernadino
Mr. Brian Huse--Conservation

[[Page 25523]]

Mr. Michael McCormack--Property Owner
Mr. Julian McIntyre--Conservation
Mr. Roger Melanson--Homeowner
Mr. Ramon Mendoza--Native American Interest
Ms. Leslie Mouriquand--Planner
Mr. Richard Russell--All Wheel Drive Vehicle Interest
Dr. Byron Walls--Mining Interest
Hon. Roy Wilson--County of Riverside
Mr. Gilbert Zimmerman--Tourism

    Included on the agenda for this public meeting will be:

Discussion of the Backcountry and Wilderness Management Plan
    <bullet> designation of a trail system
    <bullet> designation of unpaved roads
    <bullet> climbing management
    <bullet> roadside auto camping
    <bullet> major artificial water sources for wildlife
    <bullet> area closures
    <bullet> establishment of group size limits
    <bullet> implementation of the Department of the Interior's Desert 
Tortoise Recovery Plan
Development of Commission by-laws

    The meeting is open to the public and will be recorded for 
documentation and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting 
will be available to the public after approval of the full Advisory 
Commission. For copies, please contact Superintendent, Joshua Tree 
National Park, 74485 National Park Drive, Twentynine Palms, California 
92272 at (760) 367-5502.

    Dated: April 24, 1998.
Ernest Quintana,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 98-12242 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
669P03-4

#### State v. Tony Robert Jones

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Rehearing

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Dismiss

3. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Petition to Show Just Cause Under Common Law

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed

Ervin, J., recused
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hono~ebls Paul C, 2!yers, D. C.) 

Exeoutivci 33oretfiry,~ 

Skits aoord of Chiropractic exaainors, 

Austin, Torae 

. 
i 

- ,I.. 

., : 

, 

Uonorable Paul I;. tyers - pa$O 2 

I 

I 

I 

1 

'.oe bonny bclon,;lnq to tho l;oaril. The 

Trrasurcr shall kaop the sam in 8 sogar-.~ 

ate fund to be used in psying the nocctasary expenses oe the Loard, ahich my inelude expenses incurred for the abvoncemnt and c3uc;rtioa of all 1Loonseas under 

this dct and enPorocsent by the Gourd ho? 

the provisions of this Aot, tho salary ot 

the sxocotiro Sccretury, end a per diem 

of Ten Dollars to onch sd?n;ber of the hoard 

for, such tlite as is actually spent in the 

dischargo of official.duties, plus trsvelling cxymses of Tm Cents per aAla. . . ..s 

Article 6223 tas a p'art oS the hevisrxl Civil 

Statutes OS 192cJ. As auicnk?d in 1031, it provides in 

part a r;axizum of five cents per cl10 for the use OS 

privately oune3 outoc.obiles by Etate oSSicla,ls or employees in tho dischurCe of their duties. 

Article 6323 is a gmeral etatutc. ri. Dw Fin. 

.:;,2C is a later cmotsent and CoVCrs~ a special subjt?ct 

matter. Ai. Is* NO . 20, rrrthcr than Article a22n, thercfore, governs the mount of travellicg ovpenso to be 

paid to zm&ers of your Zoard. 

Tour socou3 question is nnswrrnd in the t&ativo. Expenditures ~Sor 06319, room on3 other lib0 item 

arc, personal eXpn56, only allozable in my event when sn 

oSTioer or mployeo is army froxo his horn,, or the place 

ohero he is pcrrsnoutly stntionod, ia the discharxa of 

business for the state and then only when so providti by 

law. such ltcm are co~~ovily temod stravell,inr* ergenser.* .> 

Tho Legislature has spaoiSically prwide;]. that the amber8 

of L&O Low& shall bo ontitlal to vtravellfn,~ expenses of 

ten ocnt6 per ri1c.s This rqwasonto the full ueauuro of 

oocqensation alloirod by 10s to Such Officers .for their 

~ trouble i\nd er3cnscs in trorelllng on publio bu6iness.v 

(5co *&.ilcago*, J;ouvicr~s Lav Diet.) We Christopherson 

v. stmton, Clarr of C;oUrt, (Utah) 44 ?ao. ~$8. 

Vary truly yours
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 3005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1253]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Date and Time: February 5 & 6, 1998, 8:00 am-5:00 pm each day.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
370 & 390, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Elizabeth Lyons, Dr. Meredith Blackwell, Dr. 
Gus Shaver, Division of Environmental Biology, Room 635, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1481.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Doctoral Dissertation Improvement 
Grants research proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 12, 1998.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1253 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
No. 11-1347.

#### Chafin *v.*Chafin.

C. A. 11th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 960.] Motion of respondent for divided argument denied. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
No. 12-6884.

#### Quiroz v. McDonald, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NUMBER 13-11-00037-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

J AND C ADVENTURES, INC. DBA 

ALL SEASONS POOLS, SPAS, PATIOS, Appellant,

v.

TODD AND ANN FLETCHER, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 38th District Court 

of Jefferson County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, J and C Adventures, Inc. dba All Seasons Pools, Spas, Patios, filed an

appeal from a judgment rendered against it in favor of appellees, Todd Fletcher and Ann 

Fletcher. On February 11, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's 

record in the above cause was originally due on February 3, 2011, and that the deputy 
2

district clerk, Lolita Ramos, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make 

arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be 

done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect 

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would 

be dismissed for want of prosecution. 

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court=s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

26th day of May, 2011.