alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.50   | 11.00  | --     | --     | --     | --     | 4.29   | 4.15   | 6.04   | 5.39  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.58   | 6.98   | 10.57  | 6.20   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 35.1

[U.S. Bank National Association Letterhead]

****

** **

**Annual Statement of Compliance**

TILES Trust No. 2006-1

 

VIA: EMAIL

 

MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

Reference is made to theTrust Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee, for TILES Trust No. 2006-1, dated February 15, 2006, together with Schedules I, II and III attachedthereto, and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee dated March 5, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings definedin the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements.

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice Presidentof U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger toLaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee underthe Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.

 

Capitalized terms used but not defined hereinhave the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

 

 

Date: 3/15/2016

 

U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interestto Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee

 

 

 

By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs       

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mercantile Bankshares Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Kelly,III, the Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)              The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Edward J. Kelly,  III |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Edward J. Kelly, III      |
| Chief Executive Officer   |
| May 5, 2005               |

 

 

----
#### TOWN OF BEECH MOUNTAIN v. GENESIS WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, INC.

No. 230A16

Filed 9 June 2017

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 786 S.E.2d 335 (2016), affirming an order granting summary judgment to defendant entered on 5 September 2014 by Judge Gary M. Gavenus; and finding no error in an order entered on 30 October 2013 by Judge Mark E. Powell, and in judgments entered on 29 September 2014 and 24 November 2014 and an order entered on 27 October 2014 by Judge J. Thomas Davis, all in Superior Court, Watauga County. On 7 July 2016, the Supreme Court allowed plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review an additional issue. Heard in the Supreme Court on 10 April 2017.

*CranjUl Sumner & Ilarlzog LLP, by Jaye E. Bingham-Hinch and Patrick H. Flanagan; and Eggers, Eggers, Eggers, & Eggers, PLLC, by Stacy C. Eggers, IV, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*John J. Korslen, Wake Forest University School of Law; and Clement Law Office, by Charles E. Clement and Charles A. Brady, III, for defendant-appellee.*

*Momingstar Law Group, by William J. Brian, Jr., for Pacific Legal Foundation, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for writ of certiorari as to the additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; CERTIORARI IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|New Mexico Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         | 41,583 | 42,400 | 38,818 | 36,466 | 45,894 | 44,316 | 44,538 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 47,551  | 49,151  | 53,543  | 58,516 | 60,740 | 59,686 | 75,476 | 74,970 | 74,058 | 74,570 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 76,854  | 77,237  | 75,862  | 76,393 | 72,918 | 69,261 | 68,755 | 66,007 | 63,546 | 64,965 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 62,965  | 61,857  | 57,949  | 59,475 | 61,295 | 64,576 | 62,501 | 67,249 | 86,807 | 119,573
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 133,245 | 138,659 | 163,865 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
f10k123110a2ex10xxx_chyida.htm


Exhibit 10.30 


 



[English Summary]







Advertising Agreement between Fujian Education TV Station


and Fujian Xin Hengji Advisement Limited Co.







Party A: Fujian Education TV Station


Party B : Fujian Xin Hengji Advisement Limited Co.







Cooperation:


Excepted provided herein, Party B shall operate and manage the commercial air time of Party A. Party B is the sole contactor for advertising business of Party A. Party B can use the name “Fujian Education TV Advertising Department.” However, Party B cannot use such name to do anything not related to the advertising business.







Term:


This Agreement shall be effective from August 1, 2003 to July 31, 2010 for a period of seven years.







After the Term, if Party B has fulfilled its obligation under this Agreement, Party A agrees that the Term shall be extended for another five years, on the basis that the contracted amount shall be increased 20% year by year based on the contracted amount of the seventh year of the Term.







Contract Amount:







The total contract amount shall be 70 million RMB, with 10 million RMB each year.







Party B shall pay to Party A 500,000 RMB upon execution of the agreement and upon beginning of each year as deposit. Then Party B shall pay to Party A remaining balance in equal amount every quarter.







Termination:


Either party cannot terminate the Agreement without consent of the other party.







Jurisdiction:


Laws of China







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the courts.







Date of the Agreement:


July 11, 2003
No. 12-6740.

#### Kates *v.*King et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE><ARTICLE>     UT
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, RETAINED EARNINGS AND CASH
FLOWS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>     SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>     9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>     PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>     1,153,121
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>     0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>     225,108
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>     34,699     <F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>     1,412,928
<COMMON>          59,953
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>     239,440
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>     191,085
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     490,737     <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>     0
<PREFERRED>     10,674
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>     332,458
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>     54,700
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>     0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>     21,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     503,359
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>     1,412,928
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>     1,021,948
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>     28,648
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>     921,733
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>     950,381
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>     71,567
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>     (19)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>     71,548
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>     28,583
<NET-INCOME>     42,965
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>     464
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>     42,501
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>     59,953
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>     20,428
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>     166,310
<EPS-BASIC>     0     <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>     0     <F2>
<FN>
<F1>Total deferred charges includes other assets.
<F2>Per share data is not relevant because the Company's common stock is
wholly owned by New England Electric System.
<F3>Total common stockholders equity includes the unrealized gain on
securities.
</FN>
#### Tammie L. Russo, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Amanda J. Lidlow, an Infant, Appellant, v Jason S. Bifaro et al., Defendants, and County of Chautauqua, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 428]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Gerace, J), entered July 17, 2002, which granted the motion of defendant County of Chautauqua for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court, Chautauqua County, Gerace, J. Present— Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4,663  | 5,029 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7,028  | 6,882  | 7,100  | 7,089  | 6,973  | 5,451  | 5,440  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,136  | 6,315  | 6,443  | 6,528  | 6,636  | 6,606  | 6,612  | 6,841  | 7,063  | 7,165 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,181  | 7,131  | 6,731  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Manhattan | Vaughn, JVP v. Josefina Garcia, Individually 

and as Heir to the Estate of Angel Garcia (deceased); and 

Orbelinda Herrera, as next friend of A. G. and B. G. 

(minors)

Appellate case number: 01-16-00443-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-76550

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Counsel for the appellees previously informed the court that the parties had 

reached an agreement to settle this case. In light of the additional steps required to 

effectuate a settlement agreement involving minor children, the parties now have 

filed a joint motion to abate the appeal for 30 days. 

We grant the parties’ motion. For administrative purposes only, and without 

surrendering jurisdiction, the appeal is abated for 30 days, will be treated as a 

closed case, and is removed from the Court’s active docket. The appeal may be 

reinstated upon motion of any party.

The case is remanded to the trial court for entry of such orders as are 

necessary to effectuate the settlement. 

No later than 30 days from the date of this order, the parties must inform 

the Court whether the settlement agreement has been finalized. 

If the parties fail provide such notification or an unopposed or joint motion 

for further abatement, the Court will lift the abatement, reinstate the case, and 

proceed with disposition of the appeal. 
If the parties finalize the settlement agreement, a motion to dismiss that 

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 must be filed in this Court 

no later than 45 days from the date of this order

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Massengale, and Lloyd

Date: June 7, 2018
No. 12-7481.

#### Battle *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26167-26168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-209-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

May 6, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1998, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation

[[Page 26168]]

(Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets bearing a 
proposed effective date of June 1, 1998:

Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 25
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 26
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 27
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 28
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 30A
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 31

    Columbia states that the purpose of this filing is to make a 
downward adjustment to its Rate Schedule FTS base rate demand 
determinants as provided for in Stipulation II, Article III, Section 
H(2) of the Docket No. RP95-408 et al. rate case settlement. The 
settlement provision authorizes such adjustments associated with 
contract demand reductions recognizing the loss of direct firm 
transportation deliveries to customers from gathering facilities sold 
since the settlement up to 15,000 Dth/day. This filing reflects the 
loss in firm transportation demand determinants (and associated 
commodity determinants) for two Rate Schedule FTS customers.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12484 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher J. Broschart, Appellant.

[769 NYS2d 749]

— Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated January 27, 2003 *(People v Broschart,*301 AD2d 658 [2003], *Iv denied*100 NY2d 618 [2003]), affirming two judgments of the County Court, Orange County, both rendered May 29, 2001.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

The Board of Directors

Taylor Capital Group, Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-100809) on Form S-8 of Taylor Capital Group,Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Taylor Capital Group, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill in2002. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 20, 2003