25028 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 87 /Wednesday, May 6, 1998 / Notices

Comment date: May 14, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. ER98–2685–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1998,

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

(Wisconsin Electric), tendered for filing

a revision to the Emergency Energy

Service Schedule of its Coordination

Sales Tariff (FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 2). The revision

would allow the cost of Wisconsin

Electric’s retail interruptible service

options to be recovered in its provision

of Emergency Energy to utility members

of the Mid America Interconnected

Network (MAIN). The modification to

the Emergency Energy service schedule

is in order to be prepared for any

unusual electric supply and delivery

challenges faced by utilities throughout

the Midwest region this summer.

Wisconsin Electric respectfully

requests an effective date May 1, 1998

and a termination date of September 30,

1998 when the conventional definition

of ‘‘out-of-pocket cost’’ would then be

restored. Wisconsin Electric requests

waiver of the Commission’s advance

notice requirements.

Copies of the filing have been served

on the investor owned utility members

of MAIN, the Michigan Public Service

Commission, and the Public Service

Commission of Wisconsin.

Comment date: May 14, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Public Service Electric and Gas

Company

[Docket No. ER98–2686–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1998,

Public Service Electric and Gas

Company, of Newark, New Jersey

(PSE&G), tendered for filing an

agreement for the sale of capacity and

energy to NGE Generation, Inc. (NGE),

pursuant to the PSE&G Wholesale

Power Market Based Sales Tariff,

presently on file with the Commission.

PSE&G further requests waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations such that the

agreement can be made effective as of

March 25, 1998.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon NGE and the New Jersey Board of

Public Utilities.

Comment date: May 14, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. Public Service Electric and Gas

Company

[Docket No. ER98–2687–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1998,

Public Service Electric and Gas

Company of Newark, New Jersey

(PSE&G), tendered for filing an

agreement for the sale of capacity and

energy to SCANA Energy Marketing Inc.

(SCANA), pursuant to the PSE&G

Wholesale Power Market Based Sales

Tariff, presently on file with the

Commission.

PSE&G further requests waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations such that the

agreement can be made effective as of

March 25, 1998.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon SCANA and the New Jersey Board

of Public Utilities.

Comment date: May 14, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Public Service Electric and Gas

Company

[Docket No. ER98–2688–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1998,

Public Service Electric and Gas

Company of Newark, New Jersey

(PSE&G), tendered for filing an

agreement for the sale of capacity and

energy to Morgan Stanley Capital Group

Inc. (Morgan), pursuant to the PSE&G

Wholesale Power Market Based Sales

Tariff, presently on file with the

Commission.

PSE&G further requests waiver of the

Commission’s Regulations such that the

agreement can be made effective as of

March 25, 1998.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon Morgan and the New Jersey Board

of Public Utilities.

Comment date: May 14, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

David P. Boergers,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–11956 Filed 5–5–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER98–2657–000, et al.]

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings; Wisconsin Public Service, et

al.

April 28, 1998.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Wisconsin Public Service

[Docket No. ER98–2657–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

tendered for filing an executed service

agreement with Minnesota Power Co.,

under its Market-Based Rate Tariff.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Portland General Electric Company

[Docket No. ER98–2655–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Portland General Electric Company

(PGE) tendered for filing under PGE’s

Final Rule pro forma tariff (FERC

Electric Tariff Original Volume No. 8,

Docket No. OA96–137–000), executed

Service Agreements for Short-Term

Firm and Non-Firm Point-to-Point

Transmission Service with Grays Harbor

PUD.

Pursuant to 18 CFR Section 35.11, and

the Commission’s Order in Docket No.

PL93–2–002 issued July 30, 1993, PGE

respectfully requests that the

Commission grant a waiver of the notice

requirements of 18 CFR Section 35.3 to

allow the Service Agreement to become

effective March 31, 1998.

A copy of this filing was caused to be

served upon Grays Harbor PUD as noted

in the filing letter.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Wisconsin Public Service

Corporation

[Docket No. ER98–2656–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

tendered for filing an executed service

agreement with LG&E Power Marketing,

Inc., under its Market-Based Rate Tariff.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. UtiliCorp United Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–2652–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

UtiliCorp United Inc. (UtiliCorp), filed
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 87 /Wednesday, May 6, 1998 / Notices 25029

service agreements with The Dayton

Power and Light Company for service

under its Non-Firm Point-to-Point open

access service tariff for its operating

divisions, Missouri Public Service,

WestPlains Energy-Kansas and

WestPlains Energy-Colorado.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER98–2664–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing a

contribution in aid of construction

agreement between Niagara Mohawk

and Hydro Development Group, Inc.,

(HDG).

Copies of the filing have been served

on HDG and the Public Service

Commission of the State of New York.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation

[Docket No. ER98–2663–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Central Hudson Gas and Electric

Corporation (CHG&E), tendered for

filing pursuant to Section 35.12 of the

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission’s (Commission)

Regulations in 18 CFR a service

agreement between CHG&E and NGE

Generation, Inc. The terms and

conditions of service under this

agreement are made pursuant to

CHG&E’s FERC Electric Rate Schedule,

Original Volume No. 1 (Power Sales

Tariff) accepted by the Commission in

Docket No. OA97–479–000. CHG&E also

has requested waiver of the 60-day

notice provisions pursuant to 18 CFR

Section 35.11.

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Public Service Commission of the

State of New York.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1808–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon the Continental Energy Services,

L.L.C., the Oklahoma Corporation

Commission, the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission, the Kentucky

Public Service Commission, the Public

Utilities Commission of Ohio and the

Indiana Office of Utility Consumer

Counselor.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1810–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc., (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon the New Energy Ventures, L.L.C.,

the Department of Public Utilities, the

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission,

the Kentucky Public Service

Commission, the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio and the Indiana

Office of Utility Consumer Counselor.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1481–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc., (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon the Board of Public Utilities of

Kansas City, Kansas, the Kansas State

Corporation Commission, the Indiana

Utility Regulatory Commission, the

Indiana Office of Utility Consumer

Counselor, the Kentucky Public Service

Commission and the Public Utilities

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1811–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon the Entergy Power Marketing

Corp., the Texas Public Utility

Commission, the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission, the Public

Utilities Commission of Ohio, the

Kentucky Public Service Commission

and the Indiana Office of Utility

Consumer Counselor.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–2086–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon Strategic Energy Limited, the

Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission, the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission, the Indiana

Office of Utility Consumer Counselor,

the Kentucky Public Service

Commission and the Public Utilities

Commission of Ohio.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1716–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon CNG Energy Services Corporation,

the Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission, the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission, the Kentucky

Public Service Commission, the Public

Utilities Commission of Ohio and the

Indiana Office of Utility Consumer

Counselor.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–1797–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered a filing providing unbundled

pricing in the above-referenced docket.

Copies of the filing have been served

upon the Griffin Energy Marketing,

L.L.C., the Public Service Commission

of Wisconsin, the Indiana Utility

Regulatory Commission, the Public

Utilities Commission of Ohio, the

Kentucky Public Service Commission

and the Indiana Office of Utility

Consumer Counselor.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation

[Docket No. ER98–2249–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), filed revised Service

Agreements for transmission and

wholesale requirements services in

conjunction with an electric retail

access pilot program that was

established by the New York Public

Service Commission effective November

1, 1997. The Service Agreement for

transmission services is under Niagara

Mohawk’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original

Volume No. 3; as modified by an Order

of the Commission in this proceeding

dated November 7, 1997. The Service

Agreement for wholesale requirements
25030 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 87 /Wednesday, May 6, 1998 / Notices

services is under Niagara Mohawk’s

FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume

No. 4; as modified by an Order of the

Commission in this proceeding dated

November 7, 1997. Niagara Mohawk’s

customer is Eastern Power Distribution,

Inc., (Eastern Power).

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Ohio Edison Company and

Pennsylvania Power Company

[Docket No. ER98–2662–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Ohio Edison Company tendered for

filing on behalf of itself and

Pennsylvania Power Company, Service

Agreements with South Jersey Energy

Company and Columbia Power

Marketing Corporation under Ohio

Edison’s Power Sales Tariff. This filing

is made pursuant to Section 205 of the

Federal Power Act.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Southern California Edison

Company

[Docket No. ER98–2661–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Southern California Edison Company

(Edison), tendered for filing executed

Service Agreements for Wholesale

Distribution Service with Mountain

Vista Power Generation L.L.C., Ocean

Vista Power Generation L.L.C., and

Oeste Power Generation L.L.C., under

Edison’s Wholesale Distribution Access

Tariff.

Copies of this filing were served upon

the Public Utilities Commission of the

State of California and all interested

parties.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Virginia Electric and Power

Company

[Docket No. ER98–2660–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Virginia Electric and Power Company

(Virginia Power), tendered for filing the

Service Agreement between Virginia

Electric and Power Company and

Merchant Energy Group of the

Americas, Inc., under the FERC Electric

Tariff (First Revised Volume No. 4),

which was accepted by order of the

Commission dated November 6, 1997 in

Docket No. ER97–3561–001. Under the

tendered Service Agreement, Virginia

Power will provide services to Merchant

Energy Group of the Americas, Inc.,

under the rates, terms and conditions of

the applicable Service Schedules

included in the Tariff. Virginia Power

requests an effective date of April 23,

1998, for the Service Agreement.

Copies of the filing were served upon

Merchant Energy Group of the

Americas, Inc., the Virginia State

Corporation Commission and the North

Carolina Utilities Commission.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

18. PP&L, Inc.

[Docket No. ER98–2659–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

PP&L, Inc. (formerly known as

Pennsylvania Power & Light Company)

(PP&L), filed a Service Agreement dated

March 25, 1998, with American Electric

Power Service Corporation (AEPSC),

under PP&L’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 5. The Service

Agreement adds AEPSC as an eligible

customer under the Tariff.

PP&L requests an effective date of

April 23, 1998, for the Service

Agreement.

PP&L states that copies of this filing

have been supplied to AEPSC and to the

Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

19. Public Service Company of New

Mexico

[Docket No. ER98–2658–000]

Take notice that on April 23, 1998,

Public Service Company of New Mexico

(PNM), submitted for filing executed

service agreements, for point-to-point

transmission service under the terms of

PNM’s Open Access Transmission

Service Tariff, with Tenaska Power

Services Company (2 agreements, dated

April 2, 1998, for Non-Firm and Short

Term Firm Service) and Columbia

Power Marketing Corporation (2

agreements dated April 13, 1998, for

Non-Firm and Short Term Firm

Service). PNM’s filing is available for

public inspection at its offices in

Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

20. Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC

[Docket No. ER98–2668–000]

Take notice that on April 24, 1998, in

accordance with the provisions of

Section 205 of the Federal Power Act

and Section 35.12 of the Commission’s

Regulations, Duke Energy Moss Landing

LLC (DEML), submitted for filing a Rate

Schedule to establish the terms and

conditions of the Reliability Must-Run

Services which DEML intends to

provide to the California Independent

System Operator Corporation (California

ISO), when DEML acquires the Moss

Landing Generating Plant from Pacific

Gas & Electric Company (PG&E); to

establish the rates applicable to those

services; and to set forth the conditions

under which revenue credits will be

provided to the California ISO.

In addition to an allocated share of

routine operation and maintenance

costs, depreciation, return and taxes, the

rates to the California ISO also reflect an

allocated share of the costs which DEML

incurred to acquire the Moss Landing

facilities in excess of the amounts

reflected on the books of PG&E prior to

the acquisition (acquisition adjustment)

and special revenue credits associated

with the recovery of the acquisition

adjustment.

DEML requests that the Rate Schedule

be permitted to become effective on

June 23, 1998, subject to the condition

that it has become the owner of the

Moss Landing generating plant.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the California ISO and the Public

Utilities Commission of the State of

California.

Comment date: May 13, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

21. Niagara Mohawk Power

Corporation

[Docket No. ER98–2312–000]

Take notice that on April 14, 1998,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

tendered for filing notice of cancellation

of FERC Rate Schedule No. 245,

effective date May 13, 1996, and any

supplements thereto, and filed with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

is to be canceled.

Notice of the proposed cancellation

has been served upon Toledo Edison

Company.

Comment date: May 20, 1998, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 87 /Wednesday, May 6, 1998 / Notices 25031

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of these filings are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

David P. Boergers,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–11955 Filed 5–5–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–6010–1]

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request; Postponing

Consumption: An Examination of

Individual and Household Preferences

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3501 et seq.), this document announces

that EPA is planning to submit the

following proposed Information

Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB):

Postponing Consumption: An

Examination of Individual and

Household Preferences.

Before submitting the ICR to OMB for

review and approval, EPA is soliciting

comments on specific aspects of the

proposed information collection as

described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before July 6, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Melonie Williams (2172)

Office of Policy, Planning and

Evaluation, US EPA, 401 M St. SW,

Washington, DC 20460. Interested

persons may obtain a copy of the ICR

without charge by calling Melonie

Williams at 202–260–7978 or via e-mail

at williams.melonie@epamail.epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Melonie Williams at 202–260–7978 or

via e-mail at

williams.melonie@epamail.epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Affected entities: Entities potentially

affected by this action are (i) those

individuals who are contacted and

asked to participate in the study and (ii)

those who voluntarily agree to

participate in the study. Residents in the

Atlanta, GA area will be contacted by

telephone (random-digit dialing),

students at an as-yet-undetermined

university will be contacted by e-mail

(via group mailing lists) and posted

announcements.

Title: Postponing Consumption: An

Examination of Individual and

Household Preferences.

Abstract: This information collection

exercise is a pilot study designed to

examine individual and household

discount rates and individual

preferences over intergenerational

distributions of wealth.

Currently, market interest rates are

used as proxies for individual and social

discount rates in economic analyses of

EPA programs. Considerable evidence

indicates, however, that these discount

rates may bear no relationship to market

rates. Instead, individual discount rates

appear to vary with respect to time

horizon, socio-demographic

characteristics, and the nature of the

good being traded across time.

This study will use the experimental

laboratory to examine individual and

household discount rates. Experiment

participants will be asked to make

intertemporal trade-offs and discount

rates will be inferred from their choices.

Participants will also be asked to

provide information on their sociodemographic characteristics and

financial market activities. Ultimately,

these data will be used to (i) generate

individual and household discount rates

for use in economic models involving

intertemporal components and (ii)

examine the appropriateness of using

market interest rates as social discount

rates in economic analyses of public

programs.

Moreover, the choice of a particular

discount rate to be used in economic

analyses of EPA programs is likely to

have consequences for the

intergenerational distribution of wealth.

Thus, equity issues may influence

individual preferences over the discount

rate used to evaluate EPA programs.

This study will use the experimental

laboratory to examine individual

preferences over income distributions.

Laboratory incentives will be designed

to create alternative social decision

mechanisms under which subjects

choose among different income

distributions that determine subject

payments. The characteristics defining

these alternative social decision

mechanisms correspond to equity issues

similar to those arising from EPA

policies. By observing individual

preferences over income distributions

under alternative decision rules, we can

provide EPA policymakers with

evidence on public preferences over

intergenerational distributions of

wealth.

Laboratory incentives will involve

real (as opposed to hypothetical)

economic commitments. Participation

in these experiments will be informed

and voluntary. Participants will be able

to terminate participation at any time

without penalty. Well-established

procedures will be in place to ensure

the participants’ anonymity and the

confidentiality of their responses. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and

a person is not required to respond to,

a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number. The OMB control numbers for

EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR

part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

The EPA would like to solicit

comments to:

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(iv) minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated electronic,

mechanical, or other technological

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology, e.g., permitting

electronic submission of responses.

Burden Statement: 330 subjects will

participate in those experiments

examining discount rates. Subjects will

convene in groups at an Atlanta

conference center. Each subject will

participate in one experimental session

and each experimental session will last

approximately 1.5 hours inclusive of

time to sign informed-consent forms,

answer questionnaires, read

experimental instructions and record

decisions. Subjects will incur an

estimated average of 45 minutes travel

time. Assuming a 75% show-up rate,

Haigler-Bailly, who is likely to conduct

the experiments, has estimated that 440

subjects should be recruited to obtain a

final sample size of 330. Recruiting is by

telephone and Haigler-Bailly estimates

that 2000 completed contacts are

necessary to obtain 440 recruits. The

phone calls will last from 2 minutes (for

those who refuse to participate) to 4

minutes (for those who agree to

participate). Hence, the estimated

burden for these experiments is 824

hours.

260 subjects will participate in those

experiments examining preferences over

income distributions. Subjects will

convene in groups on a university

campus. Each subject will participate in