alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 12.07  | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     |        |        |        | --     | 7.67   | --     | --     | --     | --    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-307.

#### United States *v.*Windsor, Executor of the Estate of Spyer, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: 'Whether the Executive Branch’s agreement with the court below that DOMA [Defense of Marriage Act] is unconstitutional deprives this Court of jurisdiction to decide this case; and whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives has Article III standing in this case.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 9, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-09-1999
<CASH>                                          28,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               189,662
<PP&E>                                         456,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 531,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,419
<BONDS>                                        231,236
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,505,491<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   531,341
<SALES>                                        928,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               928,995
<CGS>                                          701,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  895,279<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,673
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,897
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.71<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Number of Class A and Class B shares outstanding, Multiplier is 1.
<F2>Includes (i) $701,737 of Cost of Goods Sold (Item 5-03(b)2(a) of Regulation
S-X) and (ii) $193,542 of Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (Item
5-03(b)4 of Regulation S-X).
<F3>Multiplier is 1 for per share data.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medtronic, Inc. for the quarter ended July 30,
2010, the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of Medtronic, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
| |     |                                                                                                                                                           
| | (2) | The information contained
 in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of Medtronic, Inc.

|                        |                                       | 
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------- | 
|Date: September 8, 2010 | /s/ William A. Hawkins                | 
|                        | William A. Hawkins                    | 
|                        | Chairman and Chief
 Executive Officer | 

---
Order filed May 7, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00044

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF G.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 13128



### ORDER We have determined this case is appropriate for referral to mediation, an alternative dispute resolution process. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 154.021

— .073. Any party may file a written objection to mediation with the clerk of this court
within 15 days of the date of this order. Id. § 154.022. If this court finds there is a reasonable basis for the objection, the objection shall be sustained and the appeal

w ill not be abated for mediation. If no objection is filed, or if the court overrules the objection, the court will issue an order of abatement for a period of 90 days. If the case is referred to mediation, any party may file a motion to extend the abatemen t period for completion of mediation or to finalize a settlement.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Hassan.
No. 12-6351.

#### Richardson *v.*Mount Vernon Recreation Center et al.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-7235.

#### Woods *v.*Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Belgium (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 6,794 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 3,509  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Fw: ozone docket--not OMB

Sherry Russell to: Sherry Russell 08/05/2011 10:59 AM

----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/27/2011 01:42 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John 

Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lea Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron 

Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan 

Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/19/2011 05:07 PM

Subject: FYI--Handouts from Administrator's meeting with the Business Roundtable for the docket

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/19/2011 05:06 PM -----

From: Venu Ghanta/DC/USEPA/US

To: Jeffrey Clark/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Don Zinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/19/2011 04:59 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: Friday's 3:15 p.m. meeting

Jeff-There were two handouts:

1) Business Roundtable Powerpoint 7-19 Ozone.pdf

2) Letter to Daley (we didn't have a clean copy, so I pulled it off the web) Daley letter.pdf

Thanks, Venu

Jeffrey Clark Venu, Thanks very much. Did they have any ha... 07/19/2011 12:28:38 PM

From: Jeffrey Clark/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Venu Ghanta/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Don Zinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/19/2011 12:28 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: Friday's 3:15 p.m. meeting

Venu,

Thanks very much. Did they have any handouts? We need to include that.

Jeff Clark

Associate Director for Policy

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

919 541-5557

Venu Ghanta Don and Jeff- Here's the list of attendees from th... 07/19/2011 12:17:40 PM

From: Venu Ghanta/DC/USEPA/US
To: Don Zinger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeffrey Clark/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/19/2011 12:17 PM

Subject: Fw: Friday's 3:15 p.m. meeting

Don and JeffHere's the list of attendees from the Industry meeting with the Administrator. This comports with the list in the 

Politico article, aside from the addition of Khary Cauthen.

Thanks, Venu

-Jack Gerard, President and CEO, American Petroleum Institute

-Cal Dooley, President, American Chemistry Council

-Donna Harman, President and CEO, American Forest and Paper

-Charlie Drevna, President, National Petrochemical Refiners Association

-Governor John Engler, President, The Business Roundtable

-Jay Timmons, President and CEO, National Association of Manufacturers

-Bruce Josten, Executive Vice President, US Chamber of Commerce

-Tom Hammer, President, National Oilseed Processing Association

-Joseph Stanko, Senior Partner, Hunton and Williams

-Khary Cauthen, Director Federal Relations, American Petroleum Institute
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

VANDIE A. ADAMS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D20-1213

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 16, 2020.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Christopher C. 

Nash, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SMITH, Concur.
# FILED September 28, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) For Publication ) Appellee, ) Filed: ) v. ) Shelby County ) CLARENCE C. NESBIT ) Hon. Arthur T. Bennett, Judge ) Appellant. ) No. 02-S-01-9705-CR-00043

DISSENTING OPINION

I must respectfully dissent from the part of the majority opinion concerning victim impact evidence. Because I acknowledge that Payne v. Tennessee , 501 U.S. 808, 111 S. Ct. 2597, 115 L. Ed.2d 720 (1991), controls, I agree with the majority’s statement that victim impact evi den ce is admissible if adduced within the constraints of due process and Tenn. R. Evid. 403. I disagre e, how ever, with the majority’s conclusion that the victim impa c t evidence used in this case was adduced within those constraints.

Although legally admissible, the reasons for excluding victimimpact evidence are still compelling in my view. Particularly troublesome is the issue of relevance. This is true because the character of the victim and the effect on the victim’s family may be whol ly unrelated to the blameworthiness of the defendant. Booth v. Maryland , 482 U.S. 496, 504, 107 S. Ct. 2529, 2534, 96 L. Ed.2d 440, 449 (1987). Generally, victim impact evidence is unsettling because its use enco urages the jury to2

quantify the value of the victim’s life and urges the finding that murder is more reprehensible if the victim is survived by a bereaved family than if the victim had no family at all. See id. at 505, 107 S. Ct. at 2534, 96 L. Ed.2d at 450.

Addressing the particular evidence introduced in this case, the majority describes the five pages of victim impact evidence as “clear and concise .” H owever, as Judge Gary R. Wade explained in his partial dissent from the Court of Criminal Appeals’s ruling below, the victim impact evidence allowed in Payne and other Tennessee cases comprises only a few lines of testimony. I therefore view the victim impact evidence in this case as protractedand, consequently, prone to be unfairly prejudicial. In addition, the State’s rebuttal argument was based on the impact of the victim’s death upon her family. In this argument, t he St ate pervasively characterized the victim impact evidence as an aggravating factor to be weighed against the mitigating proof. The majority concedes that the argument was error but finds that the
error did not appear to have affected the verdict to the defendant’s prejudice.

I, like Judge Wade , ca nnot conclude that the State’s argument, considered with the lengthy victim impact testimony, did not affect the verdict. I n so stat ing, I draw no conclusions regarding the penalty imposed. I find only that a jury should be allowedto reconsider the pe nalt y under the correct sentencing guidelines. I would remand this case for a new sentencing hearing.

______________________________ _ ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., Justice
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.50 N 76.81 W Meters AGL
#### COM. v. ORTIZ, J.

3432 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

Reargument Denied 11/9/2017

CP-51-CR-1003051-1999

(Philadelphia)

Vacated/Remanded
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1594

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985

to require a reduction in the discretionary spending limits in each fiscal

year by an amount equal to the total of any reductions made in existing

programs for the previous fiscal year.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27 (legislative day, OCTOBER 13), 1993

Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4,

1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with

instructions that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to require a reduction in the discretionary spending limits in each fiscal year by an amount

equal to the total of any reductions made in existing

programs for the previous fiscal year.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deficit Reduction As5 surance Act of 1993’’.
2

•S 1594 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO DISCRETIONARY SPENDING

2 LIMITS.

3 Section 251(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emer4 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by adding

5 at the end thereof the following:

6 ‘‘(D) For the budget submitted for budget

7 years 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998, the discretionary

8 spending limits shall be adjusted by reducing the

9 limits by an amount equal to the total of any reduc10 tions made in existing programs, projects, and ac11 tivities during the previous fiscal year. The amount

12 of reduction (if any) for a program, project, or activ13 ity shall be determined by subtracting the amount of

14 new budget authority and outlays for the program,

15 project, or activity for the previous fiscal year from

16 the amount of new budget authority and outlays for

17 the program, project, or activity for the fiscal year

18 preceding the previous fiscal year.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting of the 
Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical 
Center, May 27, 1998. The Board of Governors will meet at the National 
Institutes of Health, Clinical Center (Building 10), Medical Board Room 
(2C116), 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, from 9:00 a.m. until 
approximately 12:30 p.m.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public and will include 
review of the minutes of the March 23, 1998 Executive Committee 
meeting, updates on the budget, strategic planning, and the Clinical 
Research Center.
    Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    For further information, contact Ms. Maggi Stakem, Office of the 
Director, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 
2C146, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-4114.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. Stakem in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: May 1, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12102 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Noonan-Estevan, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Noonan-Estevan, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2019                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 1   |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024