alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Mercury General Corporation: 

We have reviewed the consolidated balancesheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and therelated consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial informationconsists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be inconformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 27, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. 

As discussed in note 2 to the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159, *The Fair ValueOption for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities*, as of January 1, 2008. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

August 4, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, May 6, 1998.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, .W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Federal Reserve Bank director eligibility issues.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    3. Any matters carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to the 
Board; 202-452-3204.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.bog.frb.fed.us for an electronic announcement that not only 
lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information 
about the meeting.

    Dated: April 29, 1998.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-11732 Filed 4-29-98; 11:09 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 15.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
MER TELEMANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LTD.

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form F-3 (File No. 333-128225) and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Files
No. 333-12014 and No. 333-123321) pertaining to Mer Telemanagement Solutions
Ltd. of our report dated April 2, 2009 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. included in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008.


                                        /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
Tel Aviv, Israel                            KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
April 2, 2009                           A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Egypt (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Egypt (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 3,082 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 15


                         [DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]








LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


The Midland Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed interim
financial information of The Midland Company and subsidiaries for the periods
ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated April 11, 2002;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-64821 on Form S-3
and Nos. 33-48511 and 333-40560 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


April 11, 2002
No. 12-7415.

#### Uribe-Quintero *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Gary Gatchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2010



/s/ GARY GATCHELLGary GatchellChief Financial Officer
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Working Group: Meeting and Webinar981261592 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Jun 21, 2013 08:46 AM EDT 214 Total Attended 13 

# Session Details

First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Viktor Anderson US 888 E. Porter Rd. Muskegon MI CRMD AHRI 49441 Jeff Bauman US 539 Dunksferry Rd. Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 19020 Mary Dane US 750 N. Blackhawk Blvd.Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 Mark Fly US 2425 N. Yukon Tulsa OKAAON, Inc. 74104 bruce hierlmeier US 110 n oakridge dr new berlin WI zero zone 53153 Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill RoadChesterfield VA AHRI 23834 brian jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652 Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr, Suite 110 Carrollton TX Daikin AC (Americas), Inc.75006 Fred Minelli US 505 Pecan Street, Ste 200Fort Worth TX Hillphoenix 76102 Carl Roberts US 1401 Grandview Av Oconomowoc WI Zero Zone 53066 Ron Shebik US 12999 St. Charles Rock Road Bridgeton MOHussmann Corporation 63044 Chris Thompson US 2175 West Park Place Blvd Stone Mountain GAARHI 30087 Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201 

# General Information
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

h0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147157

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147157

COA: 310686

Huron CC: 10-004904-FH

ROBERT JOSEPH SHAHBAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior United States Circuit Judge for **

the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD EASTMAN,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN MARSHALL,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 07-56099

D.C. No. CV-04-04525-PSG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2008

Submission Withdrawn May 16, 2008

Resubmitted April 26, 2010

Pasadena, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and GIBSON, Senior

Circuit Judge.** 

FILED

MAY 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Warden John Marshall appeals from the district court’s order granting

Richard Eastman’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are known to the

parties, and we do not repeat them here except to the extent necessary. 

I

“‘[S]ome evidence’ of future dangerousness” is a “sine qua non for denial of

parole in California.” Hayward v. Marshall, — F.3d —, 2010 WL 1664977, at *10

(9th Cir. Apr. 22, 2010) (en banc) (quoting In re Lawrence, 190 P.3d 535, 549

(Cal. 2008); In re Shaputis, 190 P.3d 573, 582 (Cal. 2008)). In Hayward, we

explained that on federal habeas review, we “need only decide whether the

California judicial decision approving the governor’s decision rejecting parole was

an ‘unreasonable application’ of the California ‘some evidence’ requirement, or

was ‘based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence.’” 

Id. at *11 (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1)-(2) (footnote omitted)).

Here, the governor reversed the parole board’s decision to grant parole

because he believed that “Eastman continues to pose a significant risk of danger to

the public safety” given the gravity of the offense, Eastman’s attempts to minimize

his involvement in the crime by changing his story repeatedly, his unwillingness to

accept responsibility for the crime, his unstable social history, his lack of

understanding about the causative factors leading up to the crime, and his history
 Eastman’s request for judicial notice is denied as moot. 1

3

of substance abuse. Because the record supports the governor’s conclusion, the

state courts’ decisions that Eastman was properly denied parole was not an

unreasonable application of the “some evidence” standard, nor was it an

unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence. See id.

II

Accordingly, we REVERSE the district court’s decision and REMAND with

instructions that Eastman’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.1
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|New York Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|New York Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 23,775  | 33,322 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 42,479  | 47,778  | 48,310  | 50,065  | 58,932  | 56,948  | 71,456  |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 114,064 | 122,545 | 129,295 | 133,282 | 132,514 | 133,495 | 129,104 | 123,260 | 115,021 | 111,399
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 107,910 | 100,799 | 92,789  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT
31.1
    CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)
  I, Joseph
C. Visconti, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Valuerich, Inc.;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:
  a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
  b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
  5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
  a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.
  Date:
April 4, 2008
  /s/    Joseph
      C. ViscontiName:
              Joseph
      C. ViscontiTitle:
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1466

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to authorize

programs of child abuse education and prevention, and to establish a

demonstration project relating to child abuse education and prevention.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 15 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN (for herself, Mr. SIMON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. HARKIN,

Mrs. MURRAY, and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

of 1965 to authorize programs of child abuse education

and prevention, and to establish a demonstration project

relating to child abuse education and prevention.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROGRAMS OF CHILD ABUSE EDUCATION AND

4 PREVENTION.

5 (a) GENERAL AUTHORITY.—Part F of title IV of the

6 Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20

7 U.S.C. 3151 et seq.) is amended—
2

•S 1466 IS

1 (1) by redesignating section 4610 as section

2 4611; and

3 (2) by inserting after section 4609 the following

4 new section:

5 ‘‘SEC. 4610. PROGRAMS OF CHILD ABUSE EDUCATION AND

6 PREVENTION.

7 ‘‘From amounts appropriated under this part, the

8 Secretary shall carry out programs for—

9 ‘‘(1) the development of curricula related to

10 child abuse education and prevention; and

11 ‘‘(2) the training of personnel to teach child

12 abuse education and prevention to elementary and

13 secondary school children.’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The provisions of this sec15 tion shall take effect on October 1, 1993.

16 SEC. 2. DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM OF CHILD ABUSE EDU17 CATION AND PREVENTION.

18 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary of Education

19 shall establish a demonstration program for—

20 (1) the development of curricula related to child

21 abuse education and prevention; and

22 (2) the training of personnel to teach child

23 abuse education and prevention to elementary and

24 secondary school children.
3

•S 1466 IS

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

2 are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1993 and

3 for each succeeding fiscal year such sums as may be nec4 essary to carry out this section.

Æ