alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                      Exhibit 12
                        THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    FOR THE FIVE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JANUARY 30, 1999 AND FOR THE
                     TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED JULY 31, 1999, AND AUGUST 1, 1998


                                                        26 Weeks Ended                         Fiscal Year Ended
                                                    July 31,      Aug. 1,    Jan. 30,   Jan. 31,    Feb. 1,     Feb. 3,   Jan. 28,
                                                      1999         1998        1999       1998       1997        1996       1995
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings Available for Fixed Charges:
Pretax earnings from continuing
   operations                                        $    460     $    401   $  1,395   $  1,279   $  1,232   $  1,160   $  1,079
Fixed charges (excluding interest
   capitalized and pretax preferred
   stock dividend requirements)                           174          169        344        363        346        317        293
Dividends on ESOP Preference Shares                       (12)         (13)       (25)       (26)       (26)       (28)       (28)
Capitalized interest amortization                           4            4          7          6          6          5          4
                                                          626          561      1,721      1,622      1,558      1,454      1,348

Fixed Charges:
Gross interest expense (a)                           $    169     $    163   $    339   $    353   $    341   $    316   $    289
Interest factor attributable to
   rent expense                                            11           12         21         23         22         20         19
                                                          180          175        360        376        363        336        308

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                        3.5          3.2        4.8        4.3        4.3        4.3        4.4


(a)   Represents interest expense on long-term and short-term debt, ESOP debt and amortization of debt
      discount and debt issue expense.

</TABLE>
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 44.8  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 36.6   | 30.9   | 30.2   | 29.4   | 41.6   | 47.9   | 35.7   | 2.2    | 0.6    | 0.9   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.2    | 3.8    | 9.8    | 27.8   | 33.1   | 31.4   | 36.9   | 30.0   | 21.8   | 27.5  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29.5   | 39.2   | --     | 91.0   | --     | --     | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | 47.9   | 16.6   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### MCCULLOUGH & MITCHELL, a Florida Corporation; and Jorge Rojo, Appellants, v. WOODBRIDGE BARIC PRE SETTLEMENT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1387

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lisa S. Small, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CA-007419-XXXXMB.

Affirmed.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Georgia Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Georgia Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 3.54   | 4.07   | 3.86   | 3.86   | 4.14   | 4.10   |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 13.05  | 12.93  | 12.91  | 12.11 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.17   | 5.57   | 14.51  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40792 Conference Calendar

__________________ LARRY D. BONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS; WAYNE A. SCOTT; DIAZ, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-393
- - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry D. Boney appeals from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous. Boney presents an entirely new issue on appeal. The issue is not purely legal and, thus, cannot be addressed by this court. Boney does not raise any argument challenging the district court's dismissal of his claims. Issues that are not raised and argued on appeal are waived. Accordingly, Boney's appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See5th Cir. R. 42.2.No. 95-40792 -2- This court previously cautioned Boney to review any pending appeals in order to avoid the imposition of sanctions. See Boney v. Collins , No. 95-40742 (Dec. 18, 1995). The district court also warned Boney that he risked the imposition of sanctions if he continued to file meritless complaints. Boney v. Collins , No. CA-C-95-28 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 1995). Accordingly, Boney is BARRED from filing any pro se , in forma pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pros se , in forma pauperis , initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Boney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. APPEAL DISMISSED.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Maine Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Maine Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 86     | 349    | 251    | 198    | 296    | 121    | 227    | 157    | 25    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 22     | 23     | 22     | 19     | 22     | 16     | 22     | 13     | 44     | 68    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 33     | 14     | 17     | 51     | 22     | 34     | 37     | 40     | 32     | 33    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25     | 18     | 34     | 45     | 35     | 55     | 47     | 41     | 50     | 481   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 45     | 45     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-7067.

#### Franklin *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1370 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1370

     To require the Secretary of Defense to retire all land-based 
      intercontinental ballistic missiles before October 1, 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 5 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Wofford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
        referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of Defense to retire all land-based 
      intercontinental ballistic missiles before October 1, 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETIREMENT OF ALL LAND BASED ICBMS.

    The Secretary of Defense shall retire all land-based 
intercontinental ballistic missiles of the United States before October 
1, 1997.

                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-99-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice Following Technical 
Conference

April 30, 1998.
    Following the technical conference held in this proceeding on April 
8, 1998, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (Tennessee), circulated to the 
parties a memorandum dated April 22, 1998, which included pro forma 
tariff sheets revising its proposed Rate Schedule FT-BH. Tennessee 
requested that the Commission establish a procedural schedule for 
initial and reply comments regarding its revised proposal.
    Tennessee is directed to file its pro forma tariff sheets with the 
Commission and to serve the pro forma tariff sheets on the parties to 
this proceeding no later than May 7, 1998. The parties may file initial 
comments concerning Tennesee's proposal no later than May 13, 1998, and 
reply comments may be filed no later than May 30, 1998.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11954 Filed 5-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### COM. v. BARNES, J.

2576 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/17/2017

CP-45-CR-0000481-2007 (Monroe)

Affirmed
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1403

To extend the suspension of duty on certain narrow fabric weaving machines.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. BRADLEY) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend the suspension of duty on certain narrow fabric

weaving machines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 Heading 9902.84.42 of the Harmonized Tariff

5 Schedule of the United States (relating to power-driven

6 weaving machines for weaving fabrics not exceeding 30cm

7 in width) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/92’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘12/31/98’’.

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by sub11 section (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or with-
2

•S 1403 IS

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

3 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwithstanding

4 section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514)

5 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed

6 with the appropriate customs officer before the 90th day

7 after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry,

8 or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any

9 good described in heading 9902.84.42 of the Harmonized

10 Tariff Schedule of the United States that was made—

11 (1) after December 31, 1992; and

12 (2) before the 15th day after the date of the en13 actment of this Act;

14 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry

15 or withdrawal occurred on the 15th day after the date of

16 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo Napolitano,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:   October
9, 2009





/s/  Angelo
      NapolitanoAngelo
      Napolitano
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and
                  Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc. and will be
returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Susan GILBERT, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Damen Gilbert, Deceased, Appellant, v. CRYPTICAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3013

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Diana Moreland, Judge.

Affirmed.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0463

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN DALLAS PETERSON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Heather Perry , Dis trict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 10 2024

01/10/2024
Case Number: DA 21-0463
# EPA Registration Jacket 39578-3

Vol.4______________________________________________________________

Page 53 is not included in this copy.

Pages _ through __ are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page __ is not included in this copy.

Pages 61_ through 66 are not included in this copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

_____ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

__X__ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________