alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Naquan S. Yesenia T., Appellant; Etta I., Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 906]

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian, the petitioner, Yesenia T, appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated October 3, 2002, as, in effect, denied her application to appoint her attorney Steven T. Rondos as coguardian of the property of the incapacitated person, and instead appointed Etta I. as coguardian of the property of the incapacitated person.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the appointment of Etta I. as coguardian of the incapacitated person’s property is vacated, and the application to appoint Steven T. Rondos as co-guardian of the property is granted.

We agree with the petitioner that it was an improvident exercise of the Supreme Court’s discretion to disregard her stated preference as to who should serve as coguardian of her incapacitated son’s property. The case law in this state has firmly established that a stranger will not be appointed as guardian of an incapacitated person “ ‘unless it is impossible to find within the family circle, or their nominees, one who is qualified to serve’ *(Matter of Dietz,*247 App Div 366, 367 [1936])” *(Matter of Klein,*145 AD2d 145 [1989]; *see also Matter of Gustafson,*308 AD2d 305 [2003]; *Matter of Robinson,*272 AD2d 176 [2000]; *Matter of Chase,*264 AD2d 330 [1999]).

Accordingly, we vacate the appointment of Etta I., and instead appoint the petitioner’s attorney, Steven T. Rondos, as coguardian of the incapacitated person’s property. Smith, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  December 2, 2010 |   | /s/ Raymond J. De Hont                          |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Raymond J. De Hont                              |
|                               |   | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
# L_2010266EN.01006101.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 266/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 266/61

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUSEC/2/2010

of 8 October 2010

on the appointment of the Head of Mission for the European Union mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo)

(2010/610/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the Article 38, thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/565/CFSP of 21 September 2010 on the European mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo) (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas pursuant to Article 8 of Decision 2010/565/CFSP the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC), inter alia, to take decisions regarding the appointment of the Head of Mission,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr António MARTINS is hereby appointed Head of Mission for the European Union mission to provide advice and assistance for security sector reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUSEC RD Congo).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 October 2010.

Done at Brussels, 8 October 2010.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 248, 22.9.2010, p. 59.

1

---
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1536

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act to provide

an opportunity for former owners to repurchase real property to be

disposed by the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services

Act to provide an opportunity for former owners to repurchase real property to be disposed by the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OPPORTUNITY FOR FORMER OWNERS TO RE4 PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY TO BE DIS5 POSED BY THE UNITED STATES.

6 Section 203 of the Federal Property and Administra7 tive Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 484) is amended by

8 adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
2

•S 1536 IS

1 ‘‘(p)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 section, no property described under paragraph (2) may

3 be disposed under this section, unless—

4 ‘‘(A) the person who last held title to the real

5 property before the United States acquired title by

6 eminent domain—

7 ‘‘(i) is provided written notice of the inten8 tion of the United States to dispose of such real

9 property; and

10 ‘‘(ii) is made a written offer to purchase

11 such real property at the fair market value of

12 such property on the date of such offer; and

13 ‘‘(B) within one year after the date on which

14 such person received an offer as provided under sub15 paragraph (A)(ii), such person—

16 ‘‘(i) signs a refusal to purchase such prop17 erty; or

18 ‘‘(ii) has not entered into a contract with

19 the United States to purchase such property.

20 ‘‘(2) The property referred to under paragraph (1)

21 is any real property—

22 ‘‘(A) which is acquired by the United States by

23 eminent domain; and

24 ‘‘(B) of which title was last held by any person

25 other than a Federal, State, or local governmental
3

•S 1536 IS

1 entity, or foreign governmental entity before such

2 property was so acquired.

3 ‘‘(3) The provisions of this subsection shall apply to

4 any real property described under paragraph (2) or any

5 part of such property.

6 ‘‘(4) The provisions of this subsection shall not apply

7 to any real property if—

8 ‘‘(A) title was last held by any natural person

9 before being acquired by the United States by emi10 nent domain; and

11 ‘‘(B) all such natural persons are deceased be12 fore the date on which a contract to repurchase such

13 real property from the United States is entered

14 into.’’.

Æ
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 539    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alon Mualem, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Alon Mualem *
-----------------
Alon Mualem
Chief Financial Officer

April 8, 2008

     * The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at
the Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Medtronic, Inc. for the quarter ended October 26, 2007, the undersigned herby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Medtronic, Inc., for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
        The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
        The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medtronic, Inc.


Date:  December 4, 2007
        /s/   William A. HawkinsWilliam A. HawkinsPresident andChief Executive Officer








---
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                  CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2005-HYB10
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-HYB10


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                     Dated: March 24, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 26, 2012

y0319 

# Order

March 26, 2012

143947

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143947 COA: 300589 Wayne CC: 08-012554-FH EDWARDIAN DAVIDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND , TEXAS JUDGMENT

In the interest of T.M., M.M., and * From the 35 th District Court N.M., children, of Brown County, Trial Court No. C V 18

- 12

- 534

.

No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 020

- C V * June 10 , 2021

* Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.
, Trotter , J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered the father’s motion to dismiss his appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this
court’s o pinion, the appeal is dismissed as to the father only ; the appeal remains active with respect to the mother

.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 20 I O__ -NM- 076__ -AD

Executive Order 12866:

I

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it lappropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation? I
#### Juan GONZALEZ-DIAZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0317

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 27, 2017

L.T. NO.: 03-12229

Denied.
361P16

#### North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Mission Battleground Park, DST; Mission Battleground Park Leaseco, LLC, Lessee; Lasalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Registered Holders of CD 2006-CD3 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates; and LAT Battleground Park, LLC

1. Defs’ PDR Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-125)

2. James F. Collins’ Conditional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief

1. Allowed

2. Allowed
Materials Characterization - Spectroscopy

 Project No. 09P1634

Sample ID: Crucible (mg) Sample (mg) After 2 Hours at 765oC (mg) weight difference (mg) % Ash

blank 13356.226 11.983 13356.102 -0.124 -1.03

blank 14267.923 11.570 14267.765 -0.158 -1.37

#1 13253.189 10.143 13253.019 -0.170 -1.68

#4 15032.228 10.216 15032.154 -0.074 -0.72

#8 14701.320 10.386 14701.069 -0.251 -2.42

#12 15509.702 10.321 15509.391 -0.311 -3.01

#16 15056.244 10.544 15056.028 -0.216 -2.05

#23 15051.665 10.277 15051.452 -0.213 -2.07

#26 14827.637 10.134 14827.535 -0.102 -1.01

#30 15106.749 9.935 15106.663 -0.086 -0.87

#34 13565.275 10.218 13565.273 -0.002 -0.02

#38 14052.143 10.448 14052.121 -0.022 -0.21

2 13520.818 6.349 13520.653 -0.165 -2.60

5 14453.040 6.423 14452.981 -0.059 -0.92

7 15035.300 7.310 15035.238 -0.062 -0.85

9 13904.546 7.827 13904.493 -0.053 -0.68

11 14965.751 14.522 14965.402 -0.349 -2.40

13 14338.067 6.677 14337.834 -0.233 -3.49

15 14691.560 6.035 14691.361 -0.199 -3.30

17 13390.587 10.303 13390.525 -0.062 -0.60

19 13498.987 28.624 13498.944 -0.043 -0.15

24 13902.834 5.841 13902.708 -0.126 -2.16

28 13130.152 14.977 13130.070 -0.082 -0.55

29 15006.166 8.735 15006.081 -0.085 -0.97

32 14658.596 19.761 14657.548 -1.048 -5.30

33 12864.506 21.295 12863.864 -0.642 -3.01

36 14219.808 7.347 14219.155 -0.653 -8.89

37 14514.585 7.315 14514.225 -0.360 -4.92

40 15033.155 20.591 15033.139 -0.016 -0.08

41 14168.335 21.778 14168.529 0.194 0.89

blank 35 13684.082 6.131 13683.963 -0.119 -1.94

blank 36 14769.340 6.654 14769.384 0.044 0.66
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cove Point, MD Natural Gas LNG Imports from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Price of Cove Point, MD Natural Gas LNG Imports from Norway (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.56   | 4.45  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.21   | 4.49   | --     | --     | 4.47   | 2.22   | 3.12   | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard C. Adkerson, as Co-Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2003



/s/      Richard C. Adkerson

Richard C. Adkerson

Co-Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 12-601.

#### Stevens et ux. *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 00 77 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 21 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**