alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.31   | 0.43   | 0.77   | 0.27   | 0.50   | 0.66   | 0.65  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.40   | 0.42   | 0.89   | 0.80   | 1.39   | 1.37   | 1.62   | 2.10   | 2.11   | 3.06  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3.32   | 4.04   | 4.32   | 4.42   | 4.76   | 4.56   | 5.02   | 5.68   | 5.09   | 5.96  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.13   | 7.59   | 7.25   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00183-CR

Richard LARES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR10110

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On April 7, 2015, we ordered Appellant, an inmate, to show cause why this court has 

jurisdiction in this appeal because Appellant’s notice of appeal appeared to be untimely. The 

trial court signed a Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc on January 26, 2015, Appellant’s notice of appeal 

was due on February 25, 2015, but his notice of appeal was not filed until March 19, 2015. 

Appellant, now represented by court-appointed counsel, filed a response.

Appellant has been incarcerated since 2009 and is still incarcerated. In his pro se notice 

of appeal, Appellant “avers that he sent Motion to Arrest Judgment on February 26, 2015 a day 

within the 30 days to file.” In paragraph I of his pro se Motion to Arrest Judgment, before 

Appellant begins his arguments, Appellant states “On this 25th day of February, 2015.” There 

are no other dates on the motion to indicate when it was delivered to prison authorities. 

For purposes of determining the timeliness of a motion, we use the date an inmate

“delivered it to prison authorities for forwarding to the court clerk.” Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266, 276 (1988); Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 344 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (“We hold that 

the pleadings of pro se inmates shall be deemed filed at the time they are delivered to prison 

authorities for forwarding to the court clerk.”). Given the information before us, we conclude

Appellant delivered the motion to arrest judgment to prison authorities on February 25, 2015—

the due date for a motion to arrest judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 22.3. 

Generally, a notice of appeal is due “within thirty days . . . after the trial court enters an 

appealable order.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). But a motion to arrest judgment extends the 
period to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2) (extending the deadline to file a 

notice of appeal to ninety days if a motion for new trial is filed); Golden v. State, 833 S.W.2d 

291, 291–92 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1992, pet. ref’d) (allowing a motion in arrest of 

judgment, like a motion for new trial, to extend the time to file a notice of appeal). Appellant’s 

notice of appeal was filed on March 19, 2015, less than sixty days after the appealable order was 

signed.

Based on the record before us, we conclude Appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed

and we have jurisdiction over this appeal. We reinstate the appellate deadlines. Appellant’s 

brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 142

To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set minimum or maximum amounts on grants made for the purpose of providing financial

assistance to States whose tourism promotion needs have increased due

to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide that the Secretary of Commerce shall not set

minimum or maximum amounts on grants made for the

purpose of providing financial assistance to States whose

tourism promotion needs have increased due to Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or other disasters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary

4 of Commerce, acting pursuant to Public Law 102–368 to

5 provide grants to cover the costs of tourism promotion

6 needs arising from Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Iniki, or

7 other disasters, shall not establish or enforce a maximum
2

•S 142 IS

1 or a minimum dollar amount of assistance to be made

2 available to an individual or to a State.

Æ
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Kansas Natural Gas International Deliveries (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Rodney ST. FLEUR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 5, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10001378CF10A.

*Affirmed.*
<PAGE>

                               MAYTAG CORPORATION
                                   Exhibit 12
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                 (Amounts in thousands of dollars except ratios)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Three Month
                                    Period Ended
                                      March 31                      Year Ended December 31
                                        2003           2002        2001      2000      1999      1998
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                 <C>              <C>         <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Consolidated pretax
income from continuing
operations before minority
interests, extraordinary item
and cumulative effect of
accounting change                      $52,421       $295,656    $212,084  $356,654  $532,352  $463,067

Interest expense                        13,779         62,390      64,828    60,309    48,329    52,615

Mark to market adjustment
on interest rate swap
included in interest
expense                                  2,630         10,173       9,330     6,295     5,972     5,616

Depreciation of
capitalized
interest                                   795          2,118       2,467     2,643     2,750     2,952

Interest portion
of rental expense                        1,285          9,976       8,182     7,142     6,841     7,020
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------

Earnings                               $70,910       $380,313    $296,891  $433,043  $596,244  $531,270
                                    ===================================================================
Interest expense
(excluding swap mark to market)        $16,409       $ 72,563    $ 74,158  $ 66,604  $ 54,301  $ 58,231

Interest
capitalized                                444          1,143       1,056       552        72        17

Interest portion
of rental expense                        1,285          9,976       8,182     7,142     6,841     7,020
                                    -------------------------------------------------------------------

Fixed charges                          $18,138       $ 83,682    $ 83,396  $ 74,298  $ 61,214  $ 65,268
                                    ====================================================================
Ratio of earnings
to fixed charges                          3.91           4.54        3.56      5.83      9.74      8.14
</TABLE>

                                      -24-
457P16

#### State v. Eric Scott Turner

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-214)

Denied
**Exhibit 32**

 

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, the Corporate Trustee of Mesabi Trust, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, theQuarterly Report of Mesabi Trust on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Mesabi Trust.

 

 
| /s/ Rodney Gaughan                        |   | September 5, 2008 |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
| Rodney Gaughan*                           |   |                   |
| Vice President                            |   |                   |
| Deutsche Bank National  Trust Company     |   |                   |
| For Deutsche Bank Trust  Company Americas |   |                   |

 

----

* There are noprincipal executive officers or principal financial officers of the registrant.

 

----
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of
Principal Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard C. Adkerson, as Co-Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 13, 2003                                                 /s/ Richard C. Adkerson

Richard C. Adkerson

Co-Chairman of the Board, President

& Chief Executive Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           11651
<SECURITIES>                                      2118
<RECEIVABLES>                                    46754
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3304
<INVENTORY>                                      53275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                128349
<PP&E>                                           43728
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  202144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            47993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         24254
<OTHER-SE>                                        1400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    202144
<SALES>                                          62498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 62498
<CGS>                                            33087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    70354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 37267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7647
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2449
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5198
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 **(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nancy D.
Parmelee, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
May 3, 2005
 
 
 
 /s/
Nancy D. Parmelee
 Nancy D. Parmelee
 Senior Vice President,
 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
December 10, 2012

No. 12-7122.

#### Totaro *v.*United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
#### Courtney Octavius ALSTON, etc., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D17-0419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 10, 2017

L.T. NO.: 13160017574FC, CSE 2000970507, DOAH 17-000024-CS

Denied.
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. Section 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ron Lizee hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the annual report on Form 10-K of Preaxia Health Care
      Payment Systems Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2010 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | information contained in the annual report on Form 10-K
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Preaxia Health Care Payment Systems
  Inc.                         

|Date: September 14, 2010 | By: | /s/ Ron Lizee                   
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------------
|                         |     | Name: Ron Lizee                 
|                         |     | Title: Chief Financial Officer  
|                         |     | (Principal Financial Officer and
|                         |     | Principal Accounting Officer)   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Preaxia
Health Care Payment Systems Inc. and will be retained by the Preaxia Health Care
Payment Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to
the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of
Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Form 10-L and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Preaxia Health Care Payment
Systems Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K, irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)

---
#### Christopher B. FARRELL, Appellant, v. Allyson Manley MCBRIDE and John McBride, Appellees.

No. 4D16-2307

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015DR009084XXXXNB.

*Affirmed.*
No. 12-564.

#### Renobato *v.*Compass Bank Corp. et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.