alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         111,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,580
<INVENTORY>                                    365,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               832,401
<PP&E>                                         100,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                 361,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 940,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          277,596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,180
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   940,528
<SALES>                                        569,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,676
<CGS>                                          323,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,692)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo
      Napolitano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:    June
                1, 2007/s/  Angelo
                NapolitanoAngelo
                Napolitano
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc. and will be
      returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600177

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

KEIRON S. DARBY

Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major M.D. Zimmerman, USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton,

JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 9 August 2016

_________________________

Before FISCHER, CAMPBELL, and LOCHNER, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
No. 12-6465.

#### Martinez *v.*Yates, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Cameron, LA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 9,654 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,011  | 12,662 | 5,716  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1510

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of the

loan guaranty for loans for the purchase or construction of homes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. ROCKEFELLER (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the

amount of the loan guaranty for loans for the purchase

or construction of homes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF LOAN GUARANTY

4 FOR LOANS FOR THE PURCHASE OR CON5 STRUCTION OF HOMES.

6 Subparagraphs (A)(i)(IV) and (B) of section

7 3703(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, are each

8 amended by striking out ‘‘$46,000’’ and inserting in lieu

9 thereof ‘‘$50,750’’.
2

•S 1510 IS

Æ
---





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. 
Vancouver, Canada

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-164950 and 333-102112) of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd., of our report dated March 29, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd., which appears in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ BDO Canada LLP

Chartered Accountants Vancouver, Canada March 29,
2010

BDO Canada LLP, a Canadian limited
liability partnership, is a member of BDO International Limited, a UK company
limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of
independent member firms.

---
| Date:           November      14, 2008 | By:    | /S/      CHARLES E. HURWITZ                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                          |   | Charles      E. HurwitzChief      Executive Officer |

| Date:           November      14, 2008 | By:    | /S/      M. EMILY MADISON                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                          |   | M.      Emily MadisonChief      Financial Officer |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1313

SABRINA RENEE BROWN, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

THE WALT DISNEY STUDIOS; DISNEY MUSIC GROUP, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00041-RAJ-DEM) 

Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed and remanded with instructions by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Sabrina Renee Brown, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Sabrina Renee Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her civil 

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012) without prejudice for failure to state a 

claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). 

Because it is possible that Brown could cure the defects in her complaint through 

amendment, the order she seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 

623-25, 628-30 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 

10 F.3d 1064, 1066–67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Brown to 

file an amended complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50142 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAURO JAIMES-ESTRADA, also known as Mauro Estrada Jaimes, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-1964-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mauro JaimesEstrada raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
U.S . Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

### RECORD OF CONVERSATION 800 Independence Ave .. S W . Washington. D . C . 20591



### Date of Conversation: _A_ u

""g_

us

_t_ 1 _4

...... ,_2_ 0_1_4 __________________ _ 

### Company: Hartzell Propeller , In c . 

### Contact Name: Mr. Richard Edinger 

### Docket Number: F AA-20 13-0982

Phone: 

# ;g: Phone Number:

## :....;**:....; .::.** **-=- 14** **-=- -=** **-=- ...:..** **44 ~---------------­**  Email: 

# D Email Address:



# ------------------------

Visit: 

# D Location: Subject: Details: 

## -- ------------------- ----- Fo llo w -up dis cuss ion on providing add ition a l infonnation Mr. Edinger identifi ed how thi s r equest is in favor of the p ublic inter est and i s working on submitting the a ddition a l in forma tion. Conclusion or Action Taken: Agreed to submit by A ugust 21, 2 014.

NAME OFFICE DATE Katherine Hal e Office of Rul e makin , ARM-20 3 Au u st 14 , 20 14
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1516 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1516

  To limit the use of funds for deployment of the Armed Forces of the 
 United States outside the United States under United Nations command.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 4 (legislative day, September 27), 1993

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit the use of funds for deployment of the Armed Forces of the 
 United States outside the United States under United Nations command.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DEPLOYMENT OF ARMED FORCES UNDER UNITED 
              NATIONS COMMAND.

    No funds may be expended for deployment of any force of the Armed 
Forces of the United States outside the United States under United 
Nations command unless the use of funds for such deployment is 
expressly authorized in a law enacted after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
No. 12-7827.

No. 12-7846.

#### In re Licon; and In re Hernandez.

Petitions for writs of ha-beas corpus denied.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Vehicle Fuel Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0.04   | 0.21   | 1.06   | 0.74   | 0.83   | 0.83  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.83   | 0.77   | 0.77   | 0.77   | 0.77   | 0.34   | 0.29   | 0.27   | 0.24   | 0.01  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.03   | 0.02   | 0.02   | 0.14   | 0.31   | 0.18   | 0.62   | 0.34   | 0.80   | 0.71  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.37   | 0.41   | 0.22   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0 648

____________________________ __________ ______ _______ _______________ MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and EARTHWORKS , Plaintiffs & Appell ant s

,
v. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA , Defendant & Appell ee .

______________________________________ _____ _____________________ ORDER GRANTING MONTANA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION HOTLINE, MONTANA NEWSPAPER ASSOCIATION, AND MONTANA TRANSPARENCY PROJECT LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMIC I CURIAE

__________________________________________ _____ ______________________ Pursuant to the unopposed motion for leave to file an amicus brief in the captioned matter filed by the Montana Freedom of Information Hotline, Montana Ne wspaper Association, and Montana Transparency Project, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Amic i are granted leave to file their amicus brief on Friday , Apri l 1 9 , 2024

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 18 2024

04/18/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0648
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.19

                                FOURTH AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                        1997 STOCK PLAN FOR DIRECTORS OF
                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

      The 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows, effective May 18, 2000:

            A new Section IV(c) is added to the Plan, as follows:

            (c)   As of May 18, 2000, there shall be reserved for issuance
                  pursuant to the Plan an additional 125,000 shares of Common
                  Stock. In the event that a Stock Option expires, is canceled,
                  or is terminated unexercised as to any shares covered hereby,
                  or shares of Restricted Stock covered hereby are forfeited for
                  any reason under the Plan, such shares shall thereafter be
                  available for issuance pursuant to the Plan and shall be
                  considered as part of the 125,000 additional shares of Common
                  Stock authorized for issuance pursuant to the Plan.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed this _____ day of October,
2000.

                                    NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.


                                    By: ________________________________
                                          Vice President


ATTEST: ____________________
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Nogales, AZ Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Nogales, AZ Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.79   | 7.88   | 4.04  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.86   | 4.47   | 3.31   | 4.15   | 4.83   | 3.09   | 2.83   | 3.29   | 2.32   | 2.54  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.88   | 4.42   | 5.66   | 3.47   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024