alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 35.2**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “AdministrativeAgent”), do hereby certify to Long Beach Securities Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of January 1, 2005 (the “ServicingAgreement”) by and between Long Beach Mortgage Company, as servicer and predecessor in interest to the Servicer, and the Administrative Agent the following with respect to Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-WL3 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the“Relevant Year”):

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

__/s/ Barbara Campbell________________

Name:  Barbara Campbell

Title:    First Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Loren L. McFarland, VicePresident, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mentor Corporation (the "Company"),do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

(1)       the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; asamended; and

(2)       information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 9, 2006

/s/LOREN L. MCFARLANDLoren L. McFarlandVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to Mentor Corporation and will be retained by MentorCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

 
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MERCURY
GENERAL CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,143,160
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     176,427
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,379,694
<CASH>                                           4,771
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          56,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,660,030
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                393,327
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            311,468
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,092
<OTHER-SE>                                     700,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,660,030
<PREMIUMS>                                     757,910
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             63,004
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               3,108
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,356
<BENEFITS>                                     489,677
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    164,655
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            26,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,570
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of E.D., K.D., J.D., and M.D., ) children. ) ___________________________________ ) ) S.L., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-2770 ) DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES, and GUARDIAN AD ) LITEM PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________ ) Opinion filed December 30, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Lee A. Schreiber, Judge. Toni A. Butler of Alderuccio & Butler, LLC, Naples, for Appellant. Meredith K. Hall, Appellate Counsel, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Laura Lawson, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian Ad Litem Program.- 2 - KHOUZAM, Judge.

Because competent substantial evidence supports it, we affirm t he final judgment that terminated the mother's parental rights to her fo ur children. We are compelled to write to remind t he trial court about the strict t ime frames in cases involving the termination of parental rights. The adjudicatory hearing in this termination case was held fr om September 30 through October 2, 2014. At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court announced that it would reserve ruling until it had reviewed th e documents in evidence and orders entered by the judge who had presided over the case from January through October 2012. The court asked counsel for the parties to submi t proposed judgments within two weeks. It appears that counsel submitted their prop osals to the judge's assistant via email within that time. The trial court, however , did not render the final judgment until June 10, 2015—over eight months after the termin ation hearing, and only after the Guardian Ad Litem filed a motion for ruling on petiti on for termination of parental rights. The trial court's eight-month delay from the adjudicatory hea ring to issuing its final judgment terminating parental rights is beyond the ge neral sixty-day time required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.215(f) an d does not comply with Florida's public policy of expediting termination proceedings. See Fla. R. Jud. Adm. 2.215(g); § 39.0136(1), Fla. Stat. (2014) ("[T]ime is of the es sence for establishing permanency for a child in the dependency system."). During the eight-month delay, several events occurred that required judicial review, includin g a change of custody that separated the younger children from the older ones.- 3 - We take this occasion to emphasize to all judges who preside over dependency and termination proceedings within this court's juri sdiction that strict compliance with the rules and statutes governing the time frame s in dependency and termination cases is not only expected, it is required.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and SALARI O, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                         APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                                                 9,780,565
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         10,128,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             268,130
<INVENTORY>                                                           13,059,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                      34,966,569
<PP&E>                                                                26,764,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        12,981,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        57,167,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 11,292,617
<BONDS>                                                                3,136,745
<COMMON>                                                                 713,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                            42,471,539
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          57,167,520
<SALES>                                                               14,940,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      14,940,888
<CGS>                                                                  9,237,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         12,282,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                        79,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                        2,848,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           1,110,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                           1,737,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .25
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Loren L. McFarland, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Mentor Corporation(the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedDecember 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Dated: February 7, 2007/s/ LOREN L. MCFARLAND
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for fiscal year ended December
31, 2008 of Uranium 308 Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), I, Dennis Tan, President, CEO, and a director of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





Dated:
      November 16, 2009
                /s/ Dennis TanDennis
      Tan, President and CEO (Principal
                  Financial
      Officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID LAMBERSON,

Appellant,

v.

MORGAN HERBST,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3507

[February 27, 2020]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Dina A. Keever-Agrama, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 50-2019-DR-007628-XXXX-NB.

Suzanne Schachter of Law Offices of Suzanne Schachter P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for appellant.

Mark A. Fromang of The Fromang Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
333P16-2

#### State of North Carolina *ex rel.*Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate Bureau In the Matter of the Filing Dated January 3, 2014 by the North Carolina Rate Bureau for Revised Homeowners’ Insurance Rates and Homeowners’ Insurance Territory Definitions

North Carolina Rate Bureau’s Petition for Reconsideration

Denied 02/14/2017
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 of Uranium 308 Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual
Report”), I, Dennis Tan, President, CEO, and a director of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




Dated:
      April 15, 2010
              
              /s/ Dennis TanDennis
      Tan, President and CEO (PrincipalFinancial
  Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 Restore Medical, Inc.
2008 Management Incentive Plan
  MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (BONUS)
 Eligibility
 
    
    All Executive Officers and Director level management personnel will be eligible to
participate.
 
    
    Recommended participation rates are based upon the respective position level and function
of each executive. The Company believes its 2008 Management Incentive Plan will provide an
appropriate incentive compensation opportunity for the Companys executive officers that is
comparable to and competitive with incentive compensation programs offered by comparable
medical device companies in the Twin Cities.
 
    
    Participation rates for incentive bonuses are expressed as a percentage of base salary.
Information provided below is with respect to the Companys CEO, CFO and the three other most
highly compensated executive officers.
 Fiscal 2008
 Bonus Participation
    
    Weighted Performance(% of Base Salary)
    
    CriteriaMinimum
    
    Target
    
    MaximumParticipant
    
    Payout
    
    Payout
    
    Payout
    
    Corporate
    
    QualitativeJ. Robert Paulson, Jr.
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    50
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    25
    %Christopher R. Geyen
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    40
    %
    
    
    60
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    25
    %Craig G. Palmer
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    40
    %
    
    
    60
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    25
    %Michael Kujak
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    30
    %
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    25
    %David Bremseth
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    30
    %
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    25
    %
 
    
    Both weighted performance criteria (quantitative corporate and qualitative) have minimum
requirements and maximum levels of payout. The range of accomplishment for each performance
criteria is 0%-150%, with 100% being at target. The quantitative corporate and qualitative
performance targets shall be set and approved annually by the Compensation Committee. The
corporate performance target is based on net sales and year-end cash balance. The qualitative
performance target is based on achievement of certain corporate objectives, including
completion of milestones of certain clinical studies, manufacturing objectives and
establishment of collaborations with qualified sleep centers and qualified sleep dentists.
 Bonus Calculation and Payout
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26187-26188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12607]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Third Meeting of the Advisory Committee for the 1999/2000 World 
Radiocommunication Conference (WRC-99 Advisory Committee)

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this 
notice advises interested persons that the next meeting of the WRC-99 
Advisory Committee will be held on Friday, May 22, 1998, at the Federal 
Communications Commission. The purpose of the meeting is to continue 
preparations for the 1999 World Radiocommunication Conference. The 
Advisory Committee will consider any consensus views or proposals 
introduced by the Advisory Committee's Informal Working Groups.

DATES: May 22, 1998; 9:00 am--11:00 am.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 
856, Washington D.C. 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damon C. Ladson, FCC International 
Bureau, Planning and Negotiations Division, at (202) 418-0420.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
established the WRC-99 Advisory Committee to provide advice, technical 
support and recommendations relating to the preparation of United 
States proposals and positions for the 1999 World Radiocommunication 
Conference (WRC-99). In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, this notice advises interested 
persons of the second meeting of the WRC-99 Advisory Committee.
    The WRC-99 Advisory Committee has an open membership. All 
interested parties are invited to participate in the Advisory Committee 
and to attend its meetings. The proposed agenda for the third meeting 
is as follows:

Agenda

    Third Meeting of the WRC-99 Advisory Committee, Federal 
Communications Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Room 856, Washington, 
D.C. 20554.
May 22, 1998; 9:00 am-11:00 am
    1. Opening Remarks
    2. Approval of Agenda
    3. Approval of the Minutes of the Second Meeting
    3. IWG Reports

[[Page 26188]]

    4. Consideration of Consensus Views, Proposals, or Option Papers
    5. Future Meetings
    6. Other Business.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12607 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
##### 



Computation Of Ratios Of Earnings To Fixed Charges
 Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income from Continuing Operations
Before Taxes
    
    $
    2,254.4
    
    
    $
    6,221.4
    
    
    $
    7,363.9
    
    
    $
    7,974.5
    
    
    $
    9,051.6
    
    
    $
    9,651.7Add (Subtract):One-third of rents
    
    
    17.0
    
    
    
    67.8
    
    
    
    68.2
    
    
    
    71.9
    
    
    
    75.6
    
    
    
    67.2Interest expense, gross
    
    
    102.4
    
    
    
    375.1
    
    
    
    385.5
    
    
    
    293.7
    
    
    
    350.9
    
    
    
    390.6Interest capitalized,
net of amortization
    
    
    10.1
    
    
    
    29.4
    
    
    
    (1.0
    )
    
    
    (21.3
    )
    
    
    (30.1
    )
    
    
    (36.9
    )Equity (income) loss from affiliates,
net of distributions
    
    
    (212.3
    )
    
    
    (362.5
    )
    
    
    (615.9
    )
    
    
    (421.2
    )
    
    
    79.2
    
    
    
    (156.1
    )Preferred stock dividends, net of tax
    
    
    29.6
    
    
    
    120.0
    
    
    
    120.0
    
    
    
    151.0
    
    
    
    150.9
    
    
    
    164.3Earnings from Continuing Operations
    
    $
    2,201.2
    
    
    $
    6,451.2
    
    
    $
    7,320.7
    
    
    $
    8,048.6
    
    
    $
    9,678.1
    
    
    $
    10,080.8One-third of rents
    
    $
    17.0
    
    
    $
    67.8
    
    
    $
    68.2
    
    
    $
    71.9
    
    
    $
    75.6
    
    
    $
    67.2Interest expense, gross
    
    
    102.4
    
    
    
    375.1
    
    
    
    385.5
    
    
    
    293.7
    
    
    
    350.9
    
    
    
    390.6Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    39.5
    
    
    
    166.0
    
    
    
    166.7
    
    
    
    207.1
    
    
    
    215.6
    
    
    
    234.7Fixed Charges from Continuing
Operations
    
    $
    158.9
    
    
    $
    608.9
    
    
    $
    620.4
    
    
    $
    572.7
    
    
    $
    642.1
    
    
    $
    692.5Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
from Continuing Operations
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    15
334P16

#### ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. v. Town of Columbus, North Carolina

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1333)

Allowed