alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

**REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the TrusteesMESABI TRUSTNew York, New York

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of MESABITRUST as of April 30, 2007, and the related condensed statements of income forthe three-month periods ended April 30, 2007 and 2006 and the condensedstatements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended April 30, 2007 and2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trust’sTrustees.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial informationconsists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries ofpersons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than anaudit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is theexpression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as awhole.  Accordingly, we do not expresssuch an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modificationsthat should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for themto be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America.

Wehave previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board, the balance sheet of MESABI TRUST as of January 31, 2007,and the related statements of income and cash flows for the year then ended(not presented herein); and in our report dated April 6, 2007, we expressed anunqualified opinion on those financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth inthe accompanying condensed balance sheet as of January 31, 2007, is fairlystated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from whichit has been derived.

GORDON, HUGHES & BANKS, LLP

Greenwood Village, ColoradoJune 6, 2007

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 7652** 

CHRISTOPHER LAMAR JACKSON ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 7:10

- cv
- 02536

- TMC )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Christopher Lamar Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lamar Jackson appea ls the district court ’ s

order granting the government’s motion to dismiss his action
seeking the return of personal property

. On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jackson’ s inform al brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,

Jackson has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly , we affirm the district court ’ s judgment . We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IB 

Union Calendar No. 31 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1215 

[Report No. 112–63] 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to convert funding for personal 

responsibility education programs from direct appropriations to an authorization of appropriations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. LATTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

APRIL 27, 2011 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, and Mr. 

PEARCE

APRIL 27, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1215 RH

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to convert 

funding for personal responsibility education programs 

from direct appropriations to an authorization of appropriations. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1215 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVERTING FUNDING FOR PERSONAL RE4 SPONSIBILITY EDUCATION PROGRAMS FROM 

5 DIRECT APPROPRIATIONS TO AN AUTHOR6 IZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 513(f) of the Social Secu8 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 713(f)), as added by section 2953 of 

9 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 

10 Law 111–148) and as amended by section 10201(h) of 

11 such Act, is amended— 

12 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘APPROPRIA13 TION’’ and inserting ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO14 PRIATIONS’’; 

15 (2) by striking ‘‘appropriated, out of any money 

16 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated,’’ and in17 serting ‘‘authorized to be appropriated’’; 

18 (3) by striking ‘‘2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2012’’; 

19 and 

20 (4) by striking the second sentence. 

21 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 513 of the 

22 Social Security Act is further amended— 

23 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 

24 (A) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking 

25 ‘‘amount’’ and inserting ‘‘amounts’’; and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1215 RH

1 (B) by striking subparagraph (B) and re2 designating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph 

3 (B); and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking 

6 ‘‘amount’’ and inserting ‘‘amounts’’; and 

7 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking 

8 ‘‘amount’’ and inserting ‘‘amounts’’. 

9 (c) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

10 funds made available under such section 513, the unobli11 gated balance is rescinded. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 31 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1215 

[Report No. 112–63] 

A BILL 

To amend title V of the Social Security Act to conthorization of appropriations. programs from direct appropriations to an au- vert funding for personal responsibility education 

APRIL 27, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Richard Alfonz BENNETT, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2478

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volu-sia County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Delaware Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Delaware Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 21     | 27     | 33    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 37     | 46     | 46     | 56     | 63     | 9      | 6      | 5      | 4      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      |        | 0      | 0      | 1      | 1      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

Order 

January 24, 2017

153952

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153952

COA: 327971

Kent CC: 14-006374-FC

HORACE DEMARIO COLLINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 20, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

We further ORDER the Kent Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 

2003-03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint the State 

Appellate Defender Office to represent the defendant in this Court. 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order 

appointing counsel addressing whether a defendant who was sentenced prior to People v 

Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015), sufficiently waived his constitutional rights to notice 

and jury proof beyond a reasonable doubt of facts used to score offense variables under 

MCL 777.1 et seq., where those facts were not charged in an indictment or information, 

but where he pleaded guilty or no contest and stipulated under oath to the aggravating 

facts in the context of a general waiver of his jury trial rights. Compare Apprendi v New 

Jersey, 530 US 466, 476; 120 S Ct 2348; 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000) (stating that “ ‘under 

the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the notice and jury trial guarantees 

of the Sixth Amendment, any fact (other than prior conviction) that increases the 

maximum penalty for a crime must be charged in an indictment, submitted to a jury, and 

proven beyond a reasonable doubt’ ”) (emphasis added), quoting Jones v United States, 

526 US 227, 243 n 6; 119 S Ct 1215; 143 L Ed 2d 311 (1999), with United States v 

Booker, 543 US 220, 244; 125 S Ct 738; 160 L Ed 2d 621 (2005) (stating that “we 

reaffirm our holding in Apprendi: Any fact (other than a prior conviction) which is 

necessary to support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts 
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 24, 2017

s0117

2

Clerk

established by a plea of guilty or a jury verdict must be admitted by the defendant or 

proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt”) (emphasis added). See also United States v 

Yancy, 725 F3d 596 (CA 6, 2013).

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys 

Association of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups 

interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court 

for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Iowa Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Iowa Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 273,200
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 273,200 | 275,200 | 278,238 | 284,747 | 284,811
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 288,010 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 288,210 | 288,210 | 288,210 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-5661.

#### Moore *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-497.

#### Deyerberg *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Price of Babb, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Price of Babb, MT Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | --     | 12.95  | --     | --     | 19.21  | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
144P17

#### State v. Kenrick J. Battle

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-1002)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-3l'

1. Allowed 05/08/2017 Dissolved 06/08/2017

2. Denied

3. Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Mark IV Industries, Inc. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  466,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,200
<INVENTORY>                                    363,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               899,000
<PP&E>                                         717,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 152,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,039,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          468,700
<BONDS>                                        627,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                     724,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,039,000
<SALES>                                        560,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               560,100
<CGS>                                          376,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  496,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 
                                                                EXHIBIT 15







LETTER RE:  UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


The Midland Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of The Midland Company and subsidiaries for the periods
ended June 30, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated July 16, 1998;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-64821 on
Form S-3 and No. 33-48511 on Form S-8.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule  436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
-----------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio

July 16, 1998
No. 12-502.

#### Weinstein et al. *v.*Berger et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Calendar No. 311

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1501

[Report No. 103–190]

A BILL

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to

trading with Indians.

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 311

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1501

[Report No. 103–190]

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with Indians.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 27), 1993

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. DOMENICI, and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 2), 1993

Reported by Mr. INOUYE, without amendment

A BILL

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with

Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is re5 pealed.