alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1157 

To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system evaluations 

and certifications on receipt of requests from non-Federal interests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct levee system 

evaluations and certifications on receipt of requests from 

non-Federal interests. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Levee Cer5 tification Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RURAL COMMUNITY FLOOD PROTECTION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—On receipt of a request from a 

8 non-Federal interest, the Secretary of the Army (referred 

9 to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall conduct a levee 

10 system evaluation and certification of a federally authorVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:35 Mar 18, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1157.IH H1157

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1157 IH

1 ized levee or a non-federally authorized levee for purposes 

2 of the National Flood Insurance Program established 

3 under chapter 1 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

4 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.). 

5 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—A levee system evaluation and 

6 certification under subsection (a) shall— 

7 (1) at a minimum, comply with the require8 ments of section 65.10 of title 44, Code of Federal 

9 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment 

10 of this Act); and 

11 (2) be carried out in accordance with such pro12 cedures as the Secretary, in consultation with the 

13 Director of the Federal Emergency Management 

14 Agency, may establish. 

15 (c) COST SHARING.— 

16 (1) NON-FEDERAL SHARE.—Subject to para17 graph (2), the non-Federal share of the cost of car18 rying out a levee system evaluation and certification 

19 under this section shall be 35 percent. 

20 (2) ADJUSTMENT.—The Secretary shall adjust 

21 the non-Federal share under paragraph (1) to zero 

22 if— 

23 (A) the non-Federal interest is located in 

24 an area with a population of 10,000 or fewer 

25 individuals; or 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1157 IH

1 (B) the division of the non-Federal interest 

2 with responsibility for the applicable levee is 

3 staffed by individuals operating on a volunteer 

4 basis. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
505P96-3

#### State v. Melvin Lee White (DEATH)

Def's Motion for Extension of Time to Bile Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*

Allowed 04/13/2017
exh10-24.htm


 










Exhibit 10.24


Loan Agreement


(Translation)


 


Party A:Qufu Natural Green Engineering Co., Ltd.


Party B:Shandong Shengwang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


 


WHEREAS, Party B applied for a loan from Party A and both parties negotiated the terms in good faith;


 


NOW, therefore, both parties have agreed to enter this loan agreement under the terms and conditions as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Party A will loan RMB 20,000,000 (twenty million) to Party B as working capital.








	
2.  

	
Term: from November 21, 2011 to November 20, 2012. The principal is due in full amount on expiration date.








	
3.  

	
Party B shall pay back the loan on time.








	
4.  

	
On expiration date, Party B shall fully pay back the loan in one payment. If further cash or loan is needed, both parties shall sign a new loan agreement, and Party A decides at its own discretion a potential increase or decrease of the credit line available to Party B.









 




 


 




 


Party A: Qufu Natural Green Engineering Co., Ltd.


 


Signature: /s/ Chengxiang Yan


(corporate seal)




 


 


Party B: Shandong Shengwang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.


 


Signature: /s/ Laiwang Zhang


(corporate seal)


 


 


Date: November 18, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                      81
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,142
<ALLOWANCES>                               (40)
<INVENTORY>                              2,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,466
<PP&E>                                  12,847
<DEPRECIATION>                           7,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          15,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    7,613
<BONDS>                                  3,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 3,519
<OTHER-SE>                                (660)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            15,360
<SALES>                                 28,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        28,008
<CGS>                                   18,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           18,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         8,465
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            63
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            678
<INCOME-TAX>                               244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        434
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               434
<EPS-BASIC>                               0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.13


</TABLE>
No. 12-6491.

#### Williams *v.*Woods, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RUSH MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc.

No. 14134.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

May 10, 1950.

Reconsideration of Petition Denied June 19, 1950.

A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Franklin Wilder, Fort Smith, Ark., for respondent.

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced on stipulation filed with Board, and petition for enforcement, answer of respondent and reply of petitioner.

Motion of respondent for reconsideration of petition for enforcement, etc., denied.
127P17

#### Christian G. Plasman, in his Individual Capacity and Derivatively for the Benefit of, on Behalf of and Right of Nominal Party Boiler & Company, LLC. v. Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., Decca Contract Furniture, LLC, Richard Herbst, Wai Theng Tin, Tsang C. Hung, Decca Furniture, Ltd., Decca Hospitality Furnishings, LLC, Dongguan Decca Furniture Co. Ltd., Darren Hudgins, Decca Home, LLC and Elan by Decca, LLC and Bolier & Company, LLC. v. Christian J. Plasman (a/k/a Barrett Plasman)

1. Plaintiff and Third Party Defendant’s PDR Prior to a Decision of COA

2. Plaintiff and Third Party Defendant’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

3. Defs’ Motion to Dismiss Portions of PDR that are Untimely

1. Denied

2. Denied

3. Allowed
DanOdom, Aviation Safety Inspector Anchorage, Alaska CHDO DearDan Odom, 

## P E G A S U S

--... 

# ----**-.-:~~,,v;.,_**

# ____ ' ' AVIATION SERVICES AnAkima Company

Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (AirAgency Certificate Number UPUR695X and Certificated Satellite Repair Station UPUD695X) would like to submitthis petition for an exemption from FARPart 145, §145.103(b); which states, "Acertificated repair station with an airframe rating must provide suitable permanenthousing to enclose the largest type and model ofaircraft listed on its operations specifications. Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC (PMX) would like this petition to coverthe primary Certificated Repair Station (CRS) in Anchorage Alaska as well as any current or future D107 or Satellite Repair Station Locations. PMX's current Operations Specifications grant a limited airframe and powerplantrating so PMX mayprovide line maintenance, transit maintenance, and "A checks" for our customers. The nature ofthese transits include a short ground time withjust enough time to provide crewtransfer, fueling ofthe aircraft, and cargo movement as required. Due to the tight schedule in which our customers operate, any required line maintenance is expectedto be performed atthe aircraft parking location, which can vary on the airfield, allowing the other contracted services to be completed during maintenance. In the fifteen years ofPMX's existence, hanger maintenance has not been an issue due to the fact thatPegasus has the required equipmentto ensure article protection and segregation as required from the elements and environment, while ensuring maintenance accuracy, perFederal Aviation Regulations as well as the Regulations imposed by our customer's Authorities, in challenging work environments. PMX has temporary structures, heating units and storage equipmentto ensure all maintenance is performed safely and securely in compliance with required regulations. The temporary structures mentioned can be used to both protectthe articles beingmaintained and the Technicians performingthe workto prevent impaired maintenance perthe customer's Continuous Airworthiness Maintenance Program (CAMP) and PMX's Repair Station Manual (RSM) and Quality System Manual (QSM) especially during the longer ground times required for "A checks." It is in the public's interest to allowthis exemption as doing so will allow our customer's to operate in accordance with their maintenance programs at the outstation locations that PMX operates. Best Regards,

# ~ Kellon Borden Quality System Manager & Director ofTraining Pegasus Aviation Services, LLC.

KELLON.BORDEN@PEGASUSANC.COM PHONE: 907-243-3144 3901 W. OLD INTERNATIONALAIRPORT RD. • ANCHORAGE, AK 99502 USA
exhibit1035.htm




                                                                


                                                                   Exhibit 10.35




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) dated this 1st day of November, 2011, by and between Presstek, Inc., a Delaware corporation with executive offices located at 10 Glenville Street, Greenwich, Connecticut (the “Employer”) and James R. Van Horn (the “Employee”).







WITNESSETH:







WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee are parties to an Employment Agreement, dated September 30, 2010 (the “Agreement”); and







WHEREAS, in order to manage the Employer’s costs during the current economic environment, Management of Employer has determined to reduce the annual base salaries of all employees, except where such salary reduction is not permitted by applicable law; and







WHEREAS, Section 4 of the Agreement provides that the base salary of the Employee shall not be decreased at any time during the term of the Agreement from the amount then in effect, unless the Employee otherwise agrees in writing; and







WHEREAS, the Employee has agreed to reduce his annual base salary; subject to the provisions of this Amendment; and







WHEREAS, the Employee and Employer desire to modify the Agreement to reflect Employee’s consent to the reduction of his base salary, while ensuring that for the purpose of calculating the payments and benefits to which Employee is entitled in the event of his termination of employment, the Employee shall be treated as if his salary had not been reduced..







NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:













	
1.  

	
All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement













	
2.  

	
Employee agrees that commencing not earlier than October 1, 2011, his base salary shall be reduced to $278,350.00.













	
3.  

	
In the event of the termination of employment of Employee, the Employer agrees that the payments and benefits to which Employee is entitled under the Agreement shall be calculated for all purposes as if Employee’s salary had not been reduced.













	
4.  

	
In the event of a Change in Control, if Employee’s base salary has not been increased to at least $293,000, then in such event the Employee’s base salary shall be immediately increased to the $293,000.













	
5.  

	
Except as set forth herein, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.












Presstek, Inc.







/s/ James R. Van Horn                                                                          /s/ Jeffrey Jacobson


James R. Van Horn                                                                               Jeffrey Jacobson


Chairman, President and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: May 12, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4114, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Scott Osborne, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4114, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1782.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: May 13, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4114, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Scott Osborne, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4114, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1782.

    Name of SEP: Clinical Sciences.
    Date: May 18, 1998.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4114, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Scott Osborne, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4114, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1782.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant review and funding cycle.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applicants and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 83,893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12777 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                                
|District of Columbia Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                
|District of Columbia Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 24     | 24     | 24    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 24     | 25     | 26     | 25     | 26     | 27     | 27     | 26     | 24     | 24    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 26     | 26     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
443P16

#### State v. Ronnie Paul Godbey

1. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-877)

2. State’s Motion to Amend Response to PDR

1. Allowed

2. Allowed
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 

### 2021 KW 1179 PHILLIP NEWTON 

### DECEMBER 30, 2021 In Re: 

### Phillip Newton, 

### applying for supervisory writs, 

### 20th Judicial District Court., Parish of East Feliciana, No. 

### 13 -CR -346. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. VGW AHP CHH



### COURT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT 

## DEPUTY tLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25521]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Proposed Extension of Approval of Information Collection; Comment 
Request--Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requested 
comments on a proposed extension of approval, for a period of 3 years 
from the date of approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 
of a collection of information from manufacturers and importers of 
walk-behind power lawn mowers. This collection of information consists 
of testing and recordkeeping requirements in certification regulations 
implementing the Safety Standard for Walk-Behind Power Lawn Mowers (16 
CFR part 1205).
    This document was published in the Federal Register of October 4, 
2012, and contains an incorrect docket number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 
504-7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

Correction

    (1) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60683, in the 
first column, correct the docket number in the heading to read: [Docket 
No. CPSC-2012-0058];
    (2) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60683, in the 
first column, correct the first sentence of the ADDRESSES section to 
read: ``You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2012-
0058, by any of the following methods:''

    Dated: October 12, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-25521 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Soltera Mining Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fabio Montanari, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Fabio Montanari


Fabio Montanari


Chief Executive Officer






August 24, 2009






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT T


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Soltera Mining Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nadwynn Sing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Nadwynn Sing


Nadwynn Sing


Chief Financial Officer






August 24, 2009