UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 10-K/A
 
           [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                   FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998

                                       OR

          [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                        For the transition period from to

                         Commission file number 1-12385

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                              74-1541566
State or Other Jurisdiction of                        IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization                         Identification No.

4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia        23607
Address of Principal Executive Offices                Zip Code

        Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code (757) 380-2000

                           --------------------------

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:

                              NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS                                        ON WHICH REGISTERED
-------------------                                       ---------------------
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE                            NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
(AND ASSOCIATED PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS)          CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE

           SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
                                      NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes __X__ No ____

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this
Form 10-K. [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant was $925 million at February 1, 1999.

34,215,012 million shares of the registrant's Common Stock and associated
preferred stock purchase rights were outstanding at February 1, 1999.

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

The undersigned registrant hereby amends and restates its 1998 Annual Report on
Form 10-K to include Part III; Items 11, 12, & 13

<PAGE>

                                     PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

The Company is the largest non-government-owned shipyard in the U.S., as
measured by each of revenues, size of facilities, and number of employees. Its
primary business is the design, construction, repair, overhaul, and refueling of
nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S. Navy. The Company
believes it currently is: (i) the only shipyard capable of building the U.S.
Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, (ii) the only non-government-owned
shipyard capable of refueling and overhauling the U.S. Navy's nuclear-powered
aircraft carriers, and (iii) one of only two shipyards capable of building the
U.S. Navy's nuclear-powered submarines. Since its inception in 1886, the Company
has developed a preeminent reputation through the construction of 265 naval
ships and 547 commercial vessels.

In January 1999, the Boards of Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. and
Avondale Industries, Inc. approved and each company executed a definitive
agreement to combine the two companies. The combined company would be named
Newport News Avondale Industries Inc. The transaction is subject to approval by
the shareholders of both companies, U.S. regulatory reviews, and other customary
closing conditions, and is scheduled for completion in the second quarter of
1999. In February 1999, the Department of Justice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 cleared the proposed merger, satisfying one
important condition to the closing of the transaction. It is anticipated that
the transaction would be accounted for as a pooling-of-interests.

In February 1999, the Company received an offer from General Dynamics
Corporation ("General Dynamics") proposing to pay $38.50 per share in cash for
all of its outstanding shares, subject to various conditions including antitrust
clearance from the appropriate regulatory authorities in the Departments of
Justice and Defense. Under the terms of the proposed merger with Avondale
Industries, the Company is not permitted to enter into a transaction with a
party that has made a proposal to acquire Newport News unless, among other
things, the Newport News Board of Directors has determined that the General
Dynamics offer could result in a proposal superior to the proposed merger with
Avondale.

In order for a proposal to be a superior proposal, the Board of Directors must
determine that the transaction is both reasonably capable of being completed,
taking into account legal, regulatory and other factors, and its financial and
other terms are more favorable to Newport News and its shareholders. Given the
potential regulatory issues concerning the proposed General Dynamics - Newport
News combination, the Board of Directors could not determine that the General
Dynamics proposal could result in a superior proposal to the Avondale
transaction. At such time that the Department of Defense indicates that there is
a reasonable likelihood that antitrust issues would not impede negotiations, the
Board of Directors would then be prepared to evaluate the terms of the General
Dynamics proposal, including the proposed price.

In March 1999, the Company announced the formation of a worldwide business
partnership with Science Applications International Corp. ("SAIC"). The
partnership will involve a new limited liability company ("LLC") comprised of
SAIC's subsidiary, AMSEC, and the Company's life cycle engineering department.
The new organization will be named AMSEC LLC and will create a low cost fleet
services organization capable of providing logistics and life cycle services for
aircraft carriers, submarines, surface combatants, and amphibious and auxiliary
ships from 20 locations, including every major U.S. Navy port. The new
organization will employ approximately 1,500 current employees of AMSEC and the
Company. The Company will own 45% and SAIC 55% of the new organization.

Aircraft carrier and submarine construction contracts with the U.S. Navy have
generated the majority of the Company's revenues. Overall, the Company's U.S.
Navy business accounted for approximately 92%, 94%, and 94% of the Company's
revenues for 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. Newport News Shipbuilding has
built 10 of the 12 active aircraft carriers in the U.S. fleet, including all
nine nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. For the last 37 years, Newport News
Shipbuilding has been the sole designer and builder of the U.S. Navy's aircraft
carriers.

On December 11, 1996, in connection with a corporate reorganization, the
Company's former parent and its subsidiaries undertook and completed various
intercompany transfers and distributions designed to restructure, divide, and
separate their then existing businesses, assets, liabilities, and operations so
that, among other things, the shipbuilding business of the Company's former
parent ("Shipbuilding Business") would be owned by the Company. The former
parent subsequently distributed (the "spinoff") pro rata to holders of the
parent company's common stock all of the outstanding common stock of the
Company.

Unless the context otherwise requires, as used herein, the term "Company"
refers: (i) for periods prior to the spinoff to Newport News Shipbuilding and
Dry Dock Company ("Newport News"), a Virginia corporation, and certain other
subsidiaries through which the former parent conducted its Shipbuilding Business
during such periods, and (ii) for periods after the spinoff, to Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. ("NNS"), a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated
subsidiaries, including Newport News.

For a summary of the Company's revenues and operating earnings by classes of
products and service, see Item 7-"Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

CONSTRUCTION

The Company's primary activity is constructing ships, with approximately 45%,
55%, and 55% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996,
respectively, being generated from construction work. In recent history, the
Company has principally been engaged in designing, constructing, overhauling,
and repairing aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S. Navy, and the
Company's strategy is to improve this focus on its core business while growing
its U.S. Navy fleet maintenance, repair, and support business.

In June 1998, the Company delivered HARRY S. TRUMAN, marking the completion of
the eighth NIMITZ class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier built by the Company.
Currently, the Company is constructing RONALD REAGAN, the ninth NIMITZ-class
carrier, scheduled for delivery in 2002. Long-lead funding for an additional
NIMITZ-class aircraft carrier, the last in its class, was originally scheduled
to begin in 2000, with full funding for the construction of the carrier slated
for 2002. The Company proposed accelerating funding as a means of reducing the
acquisition cost of the carrier, and Congress responded by providing
approximately $49 million in 1998 and $125 million in 1999 for the program. Full
funding for the carrier is expected to be awarded in 2001.

<PAGE>

As part of its continuing efforts to provide value and attract future carrier
work, the Company established its Carrier Innovation Center ("Center") in 1996.
The Center provides a state-of-the-art venue for design and systems solutions to
reduce both acquisition and life-cycle costs of ships. The Center seeks to
develop the most innovative and cost-effective designs for future aircraft
carriers built at the Company. The Center also seeks to provide an optimum
setting for integrated product and process development teams.

In June 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia approved $98 million in funding for
the Company to construct and operate the Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and
Carrier Integration Center ("VASCIC"). VASCIC will serve as the focal point for
the Company to advance the integration of systems, promote the application of
emerging technology into future carriers, and position the Company as the
technology and design leader for the next class of nuclear-powered aircraft
carriers. VASCIC will enhance and promote the quality and competitiveness of
Virginia's shipbuilding industry through testing and integration development
projects, research, and training of workers in the shipbuilding industry.

The Company is currently performing design concept studies for the next
generation of aircraft carriers to follow the NIMITZ-class. The first aircraft
carrier in this new class is expected to be awarded in 2006. In September 1998,
the Defense Acquisition Board announced that future aircraft carriers will be
large-deck and nuclear. Because of its position as the only shipyard capable of
building the U.S. Navy's nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, the Company believes
it is in a strong competitive position to be awarded these contracts, although
no assurances can be given that it will receive any award, that the project will
not be delayed, or that the project will be funded by Congress.

The Company is also one of two U.S. manufacturers of U.S. Navy nuclear-powered
submarines. The Company has constructed 53 nuclear-powered submarines, including
39 fast attack submarines and 14 of the larger, fleet ballistic missile
submarines. The Company delivered its final LOS ANGELES-class submarine in
August 1996.

At the urging of the U.S. Navy, the Company and Electric Boat Corporation
("Electric Boat"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Dynamics Corporation,
reached an agreement in February 1997 to cooperatively build the first four new
nuclear attack submarines of the VIRGINIA class ("NSSNs") included in the
President's defense budget. The teaming agreement calls for each company to
construct certain portions of each submarine, with final assembly, testing,
outfitting, and delivery alternating between the two yards. Electric Boat will
act as the prime contractor and lead designer under the agreement. In September
1997, Congress approved the Company's teaming arrangement for co-production of
the first four NSSNs as part of the 1998 fiscal year defense authorization and
appropriations processes. The teaming arrangement ensures the Company's early
and ongoing participation in this important program. In September 1998, under
the teaming arrangement, the Company aided in the negotiation of a $4.2 billion
contract for co-production of the first four NSSNs. Design, development, and
planning work took place over the course of 1998, with the Company initiating
significant NSSN construction in early 1999. The Company estimates that the NSSN
program could total up to 30 submarines, although no assurances can be given as
to the number of NSSNs that ultimately will be procured and built by the
Company, either alone or in cooperation with Electric Boat.

As part of a strategy introduced in the early 1990's to add to its core U.S.
Navy business, the Company pursued orders for products and services from
commercial customers. From 1994 to 1996, the Company entered into fixed price
contracts to construct a total of nine DOUBLE EAGLE product tankers. In March
1998, the Company announced changes in its commercial shipbuilding business that
will result in only six ships being built and a withdrawal from this market by
the middle of 1999. Of the six total ships, five have been delivered, and the
sixth ship will be delivered by the middle of 1999.


FLEET SERVICES (Previously "OVERHAUL AND REPAIR")

The Company provides ongoing maintenance for the U.S. Navy's vessels through
overhaul, refueling, and repair work. The Company possesses unique expertise in
servicing nuclear naval systems, and believes it is the only
non-government-owned shipyard presently capable of refueling nuclear-powered
aircraft carriers. The Company has had a leading share of the market in aircraft
carrier refueling and overhauls.

<PAGE>

In an effort to enhance the Company's operations in this area, the Company
completed its Consolidated Refueling Facility ("CRF") at a cost of approximately
$20 million in early 1997. The CRF supports the Company's Naval refueling
program by, among other things, consolidating refueling operations from 13
different facilities throughout the Company. The CRF is a 58,000 square-foot
complex consisting of production, warehousing, and training areas.

The Company also began planning and construction of a $26 million Radiological
Support Facility ("RSF") in late 1997. Scheduled for completion in 2000, the RSF
will relocate radiological support activities from 23 sites in the shipyard to a
single facility. The facility will house a liquid waste treatment plant, various
laboratory functions, and capabilities for handling hazardous/radioactive
material.

Aircraft carrier work is generally assigned by the U.S. Navy based on the type
of work, location, and cost. In May 1998, the Company began refueling work on
the NIMITZ, the first refueling of a NIMITZ-class aircraft carrier. Each
NIMITZ-class aircraft carrier will be refueled once in its 50-year life. The
Company estimates that up to ten Nimitz-class aircraft carriers could be
refueled over the next 30 to 40 years, although no assurances can be given as to
the number of NIMITZ-class carriers that will be refueled and that the Company
will receive any award. In July 1998, the Company finished the yearlong overhaul
and repair of the USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT. The Company also completes "Post
Shake-Down Availabilities" on carriers and submarines, consisting of repairs and
maintenance after original delivery of a vessel to the U.S. Navy.

In August 1998, the Company began planning for the inactivation of the submarine
NARWHAL, a one-of-a-kind fast attack nuclear submarine. Work anticipated to be
performed by the Company through April 2000 will include inactivation,
defueling, and preparation of the NARWHAL for disposition by the government.

In December 1997, the Company completed its acquisition of Continental Maritime
Industries, Inc. ("CMI"), a ship repair yard in San Diego, California engaged in
repair programs for the U.S. Navy's West Coast fleet. The acquisition is a key
component of the Company's long-term strategy to broaden its base of services to
the U.S. Navy. In addition to providing an immediate presence in San Diego, the
U.S. Navy's primary homeport on the West Coast, CMI offers the Company an
experienced management team that has a successful track record in the West Coast
ship repair and fleet support markets. In October 1998, the Company began the
first Planned Incremental Availability ("PIA") for the JOHN C. STENNIS at its
homeport in San Diego, California.

ENGINEERING

The Company provides engineering, planning, and design services primarily to the
U.S. Navy. The Company maintains a stable level of funded engineering support
services for the U.S. Navy, which includes new aircraft carrier research and
development, reactor plant planning, aircraft carrier engineering support, and
training and logistics. The Company is a leader in aircraft carrier design,
performing a majority of the ship integration and related design development
work for the Naval Sea Systems Command. U.S. Navy shipyards, however, have
historically received design contracts for the non-nuclear portions of the
aircraft carriers. The Company has been able to apply its engineering
capabilities in a variety of projects for the U.S. Navy, including being the
lead design yard and planning yard for the LOS ANGELES-class submarine and lead
design yard for the SEAWOLF-class submarine.

COMPETITION

In the Company's opinion, the number of programs currently planned by the U.S.
Navy over the next several years will increase competitive pressures among U.S.
shipyards presently engaged in ship design and construction. The reduced level
of shipbuilding activity by the U.S.Navy during the past decade has resulted in
fewer contracts and workforce reductions in the industry, but little
infrastructure consolidation. The general result has been fewer contracts
awarded to the same fixed number of large shipyards.

<PAGE>

The Company believes an existing government-owned U.S. West Coast shipyard could
refuel nuclear-powered carriers if it made substantial investments in its
facilities, personnel, and training. An existing government-owned U.S. East
Coast shipyard is presently involved in nuclear refueling, overhauling, and
de-activation of LOS ANGELES-class submarines. With respect to the market for
U.S. military contracts for other types of vessels, there are principally six
major private U.S. shipyards, including the Company, that compete for contracts
to construct, overhaul, repair or convert other types of vessels.

In addition to competition from other shipyards, the Company competes for
project approval and funding with firms providing other defense products and
services, such as tanks and aircraft, to other branches of the armed forces, and
with other, non-defense demands on the U.S. budget. The Company also competes in
the engineering, planning, and design market with other companies that provide
engineering support services.

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING, CLAIMS, AND INVESTIGATIONS

More than 90% of the Company's sales involve contracts entered into with the
U.S. Government. The Company's principal U.S. Government business is currently
performed under fixed price ("FP"), fixed price plus incentive fee ("FPIF"),
cost plus incentive fee ("CPIF") , and cost plus fixed fee ("CPFF") contracts.
The risk to the Company of not being reimbursed for its costs varies with the
type of contract. Under FP contracts, the contractor retains all cost savings on
completed contracts, but is liable for the full amount of all expenditures in
excess of the contract price. FPIF contracts, on the other hand, provide for
cost sharing between the United States Government and the contractor. The
contractor's fee is increased or decreased according to a formula set forth in
the contract, which generally compares the amount of cost incurred to the
contract target cost. The U.S. Government is liable for all allowable costs up
to a ceiling price. Under CPIF contracts, the contractor's profit is determined
by a contractually specified formula, which essentially compares allowable
incurred costs to the contract target cost. Under CPFF contracts, with few
exceptions, the fee is the same without regard to the amount of cost incurred.
The Company currently constructs aircraft carriers pursuant to FPIF contracts,
but it performs work for the U.S. Government under all the types of contracts
described above.

Contracting with the U.S. Government may also result in the Company filing
Requests for Equitable Adjustments ("REA") in connection with its contracts.
REAs represent claims against the U.S. Government for changes in the original
contract requirements and resulting delays and disruption in contract
performance. There are currently no material REAs under negotiation with the
Company's customers.

The U.S. Government has the right to suspend or debar a contractor from
government contracting for violations of certain statutes or government
procurement regulations. The U.S. Government may also unilaterally terminate
contracts at its convenience with compensation for work completed.

As a general practice within the defense industry, the Defense Contact Audit
Agency (the "DCAA") and other government agencies continually review the cost
accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company,
conduct other investigations, and make specific inquiries. In the course of
those reviews and investigations, cost accounting and other issues are
identified, discussed and settled, or resolved through legal proceedings.

As with other government contractors, the U.S. Government has from time to time
recommended that certain of the Company's contract prices be reduced, or costs
allocated to its government contracts be disallowed. Some of these
recommendations involve substantial amounts. In the past, as a result of such
audits and other investigations and inquiries, the Company has on occasion made
adjustments to its contract prices and the costs allocated to its government
contracts.

The Company is currently involved in several such audits and other investigative
proceedings with the U.S. Government. Although the eventual outcome of these
audits and investigations cannot be determined at this time, management
believes, based on current information, that the ultimate resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial
condition or results of operations (See Note 13 - "Commitments and
Contingencies" to the Financial Statements of the Company).

<PAGE>

REGULATION

The Company is subject to stringent environmental laws and regulations in all
jurisdictions in which it operates. Management of the Company believes that the
Company is in substantial compliance with all applicable environmental laws and
regulations. Historically, environmental compliance costs incurred by the
Company have not been material. Like all of its U.S. competitors, the Company
will be required to upgrade its air emission control facilities pursuant to
recently drafted regulations under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. These
regulations call for a phased-in compliance program so that the Company will
continue to incur such costs through 2000. Environmental compliance costs for
the year ended December 31, 1998 were not material to the Company's financial
position or results of operations. Although there can be no assurances,
management does not believe that future environmental compliance costs will have
a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Energy and the Department
of Defense regulate and control various matters relating to nuclear materials
handled by the Company. Subject to certain requirements and limitations, the
Company's government contracts generally provide for indemnity by the U.S.
Government for any loss arising out of or resulting from certain nuclear risks
(See also "Government Contracting, Claims, and Investigations" on Pages 4 and
5).

BACKLOG

The Company's funded backlog at December 31, 1998 and 1997 was $3.9 billion and
$2.8 billion, respectively. Backlog levels can change and U.S. Government
contracts can be unilaterally terminated for the convenience of the U.S.
Government at any time with compensation for work completed. More than 95% of
the Company's backlog at December 31, 1998 continued to be U.S. Navy-related.
Additions anticipated in 1999 include expected awards for the NARWHAL
inactivation and the third VIRGINIA-class attack submarine construction
contract. The portion of 1998's backlog expected to remain at December 31, 1999
is $2.5 billion.

MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

All major materials, parts, and components for the Company's products are
currently available in adequate supply from domestic and/or foreign sources.
Through the cost escalation provisions contained in some of its U.S. Government
contracts, the Company is generally protected from increases in its material
costs to the extent that the increases in the Company's costs are in line with
industry indices. In connection with its government contracts, the Company is
required to procure certain materials and component parts from supply sources
approved by the U.S. Government. The Company has not generally been dependent
upon any single-supply source; however, due largely to the consolidation of the
defense industry, there are currently several components for which there is only
one supplier. The Company believes that these sole source suppliers as well as
its overall supplier base are adequate to meet its foreseeable future needs.


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs are charged to operating costs and expenses as
incurred. The amounts charged during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997,
and 1996 were $24 million, $38 million, and $42 million, respectively. Under
current regulations, research and development costs can be charged to the U.S.
Government as allowable overhead allocated across all of the Company's
contracts. The actual amount of research and development costs allowed to pass
through U.S. Navy contracts is reviewed annually. Additionally, research and
development costs can also be directly funded by the U.S. Government through
specific contracts. These contracts produce quantifiable deliverables for the
U.S. Navy, for example, certain research and development projects on aircraft
carriers. Such research and development costs incurred under specific customer
contracts during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996 were $57
million, $38 million, and $25 million, respectively.

<PAGE>

EMPLOYEES

At the end of 1998, the Company had approximately 18,200 employees, of whom
approximately 52% were covered by collective bargaining agreements with various
unions. The Company has entered into three collective bargaining agreements
covering nearly all of the Company's approximately 9,800 hourly employees. The
agreement with the United Steelworkers of America covers approximately 9,300
employees and expires April 4, 1999. The other agreements cover approximately
150 employees and expire by 2001. The Company and the United Steelworkers of
America are presently engaged in negotiations for a successor collective
bargaining agreement. The Company believes that its relationships with these
unions are good and that successor agreements can be negotiated without a work
stoppage. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will not
experience labor disruptions associated with the collective bargaining
agreements.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE
SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning,
among other things, the Company's prospects, anticipated developments and
business strategies. These forward-looking statements are identified by terms
such as "intends," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "anticipates," "goal,"
"plan," "should," "believes" and "scheduled." The Company's actual results may
differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking
statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include (i) the factors
discussed in Notes 2, 7, 10, and 13 to the Company's Financial Statements, (ii)
the factors addressed in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and (iii) the following factors: (a)
general U.S. and international political, economic and competitive conditions;
(b) initiatives to reduce the federal budget, including further reductions in
defense spending, or the failure of anticipated increases in defense spending to
materialize in whole or in part; (c) reductions in the number or size of U.S.
Navy contracts awarded to the Company; (d) unanticipated events affecting
delivery and production schedules or design and manufacturing processes, which
could impair the Company's efforts to deliver its products on time or to reduce
production costs and cycle time or realize in a timely manner some or all of the
benefits, if any, of such reductions; and (e) unanticipated events affecting the
Company's efforts and the efforts of its suppliers, subcontractors, and
customers (including the U.S. Navy) to timely correct or adequately respond to
Year 2000 problems inherent in essential computer systems, which could impair
the Company's supply chain, subcontracts, liquidity or operations, or the
ability of its customers to timely pay for products and services provided.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

The Company's principal facilities are located in Newport News, Virginia on
approximately 550 acres owned by the Company at the mouth of the James River.
Its facilities include seven graving docks, a floating dry dock, two outfitting
berths, five outfitting piers, a module outfitting facility, and various other
shops. Dry Dock 12 is the largest in the Western Hemisphere, and has been
extended to 662 meters. Dry Dock 12 is serviced by a 900 metric ton capacity
gantry crane that spans the dry dock and work platen. These facilities are
pledged as collateral under terms of the Company's outstanding long-term debt
agreements (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the
Financial Statements of the Company). The Company believes that substantially
all of its productive assets are, in general, well maintained, in good operating
condition, considered adequate for present needs, and, as supplemented by
planned construction, expected to remain adequate for the near future.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The information set forth in Item 1 under the caption "Government Contracting,
Claims and Investigations" appearing on PAGES 4 AND 5, and in Note 13
"Commitments and Contingencies - Government Contracting and - Significant
Estimates" to the Financial Statements of the Company appearing on pages 41
THROUGH 42, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated herein by
reference in response to this item.

ITEM 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 4.1  EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information as to executive officers of the Company, set forth in Item 10,
appearing on pages 48 THROUGH 49 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is hereby
incorporated in this Item 4.1 by reference.

<PAGE>

                                     PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR THE COMPANY'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

The common stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), of the Company
is listed on the New York and Chicago Stock Exchanges. Options in the Company's
stock are traded on the American Stock Exchange.

The following table reflects the range of high and low selling prices of the
Company's common stock by accounting quarter for 1998 and 1997 based on selling
prices as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

                                                               1998
                                                         -----------------
                                                         HIGH         LOW
                                                         -----       -----
     First Quarter..................................   $ 28 3/4    $ 22 1/2
     Second Quarter.................................     28 3/4      25 1/4
     Third Quarter..................................     27 7/8      23 1/4
     Fourth Quarter.................................     33 7/16     25 3/8

                                                               1997
                                                         -----------------
                                                         HIGH          LOW
                                                         ----         -----
     First Quarter..................................   $ 17        $ 14 1/2
     Second Quarter.................................     18          13
     Third Quarter..................................     22 1/8      17 1/4
     Fourth Quarter.................................     26 3/8      20 3/8


Dividends of $5.6 million were paid on the common stock during 1998 and 1997. As
of December 31, 1998, the Company had 34,215,012 shares of common stock
outstanding. As of February 1, 1999, there were approximately 38,000 holders of
record of common stock. The Company's long-term debt obligations contain certain
customary restrictive covenants, including a limitation on the payment of
dividends (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the
Financial Statements of the Company).


ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                              --------------------------------------------------------
                                                               1998(a)    1997(a)    1996(a)      1995          1994
                                                              --------    ------     --------   --------      --------
<S>                                                              <C>         <C>          <C>       <C>         <C>

MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA:
Revenues..................................................    $  1,862    $  1,707    $  1,870    $  1,756    $  1,753
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Net earnings (loss).......................................    $     66    $    (48)   $     55    $     73    $     91
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Net earnings  (loss) per common share (b)
     Basic................................................    $   1.91    $  (1.39)   $   1.60         N/A         N/A
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

     Diluted..............................................    $   1.85    $  (1.39)   $   1.60         N/A         N/A
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Total assets..............................................    $  1,600    $  1,515    $  1,535    $  1,427    $  1,311
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Long-term obligations (c).................................    $    591    $    548    $    596    $    292    $    287
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========

Cash dividends declared per common share (d)..............    $    .16    $    .16         N/A         N/A         N/A
                                                              ========    ========    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


(a)  For a discussion of significant items affecting comparability of the
     financial information as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998,
     1997, and 1996, see Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
     Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

(b)  Basic net earnings (loss) per common share is based on net earnings (loss)
     divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
     years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the period from December 12,
     1996 through December 31, 1996. Since the Company was a wholly-owned
     subsidiary prior to December 12, 1996, there are no comparable results for
     prior periods (See Note 14 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company -
     Corporate Debt and Interest Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the
     Company).

(c)  Amounts prior to 1996 represent debt allocated to the Company from its
     former parent (See Note 14 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company
     Corporate Debt and Interest Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the
     Company). Historical amounts for 1998, 1997, and 1996 represent obligations
     of the Company as a separate public entity.

(d)  Cash dividends declared per common share were four cents per share for each
     quarter in 1998 and 1997. Since the Company was a wholly-owned subsidiary
     prior to December 12, 1996, there are no comparable results for prior
     periods (See Note 14 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company - Corporate
     Debt and Interest Allocation" to the Financial Statements of the Company).

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

The following review of the results of operations and financial condition of the
Company should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related
notes contained herein.

The U.S. Navy accounted for approximately 92% of the Company's revenues in 1998,
94% in 1997, and 94% in 1996. Nearly half of the Company's principal U.S. Navy
business is currently being performed under firm fixed price or fixed price
incentive contracts, which wholly or partially cause the risk of construction
costs that exceed the contract target cost to be borne by the Company. The
accompanying table summarizes the percentage of revenues by contract type.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRACT TYPE                                         1998          1997          1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>           <C>


Firm Fixed Price/Fixed Price Incentive............      50%            61%           64%
Cost Based........................................      50             39            36
                                                    -------       --------      --------

Total.............................................     100%           100%          100%
                                                    =======       ========      ========
</TABLE>


The Company reports revenues and profits on its long-term contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, determined on the basis of
incurred costs to estimated final total costs. Anticipated losses on contracts
are reported when first identified by the Company. The performance of contracts
usually extends over several years, requiring periodic reviews and revisions of
estimated final contract prices and costs. The effect of revisions to estimates
is included in earnings in the period the revisions are made.

1998 COMPARED TO 1997

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUES                                                          1998          1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                               <C>             <C>
MILLIONS
Construction.................................................    $  833        $   935
Fleet Services...............................................       720            500
Engineering..................................................       282            248
Related Businesses & Other...................................        27             24
                                                                 ------         ------

Total........................................................    $1,862        $ 1,707
                                                                 ======        =======
</TABLE>

<PAGE>


The Company's revenues increased 9.1% during 1998, improving to $1.86 billion
from $1.71 billion. The higher revenue level, as detailed in the following
discussion of operations, was driven by Fleet Services and Engineering.

CONSTRUCTION - The $102 million decrease in revenues is primarily attributable
to lower carrier construction activity due to the delivery of the aircraft
carrier TRUMAN in June 1998. Revenues are also lower since the second of two
SEALIFT conversion vessels was delivered in May 1997. These decreases are
partially offset by increased construction activity on the aircraft carrier
REAGAN and the VIRGINIA class of nuclear attack submarines.

FLEET SERVICES - The $220 million increase in revenues is due to higher levels
of refueling and overhaul activity on the aircraft carrier NIMITZ, which arrived
at the shipyard in May 1998. Other improvements are generated by increased
commercial and government ship repair activity, incremental planning work on the
submarine NARWHAL inactivation, and contributions from the Company's
wholly-owned subsidiary, Continental Maritime Industries, Inc. ("CMI"), which
was acquired in December 1997. These increases are partially offset as a result
of the delivery of the aircraft carrier ROOSEVELT in July 1998 after successful
completion of the extended dry-docking selected restricted availability
("EDSRA").

ENGINEERING - Revenues improved $34 million in 1998, increasing to $282 million
from $248 million in 1997. The majority of the increase is attributable to
higher levels of activity on aircraft carrier design, the VIRGINIA class of
attack submarine, nuclear engineering, and submarine research and development.
Engineering work on SEAWOLF and LOS ANGELES class submarines decreased during
the year due to the maturity of these programs.

RELATED BUSINESSES & OTHER - Revenues from Related Businesses & Other increased
$3 million in 1998. The higher level of activity is due to miscellaneous
services for such items as valve and pump repair and consulting and technical
services.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EARNINGS                                          1998          1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>

MILLIONS
Construction..........................................     $    92        $   (83)
Fleet Services........................................          69             50
Engineering...........................................          21             19
Related Businesses & Other............................          (7)            (5)
                                                           --------       --------

Total.................................................     $   175        $   (19)
                                                           ========       ========
</TABLE>


Operating earnings of $175 million in 1998 substantially exceeded reported
performance in 1997, when a $207 million charge against operating earnings on
the DOUBLE EAGLE product tanker construction program resulted in a reported
operating loss of $19 million for the total Company. In addition to the
year-over-year gains associated with stability in the commercial tanker program,
increases were also generated through higher levels of Fleet Services and
Engineering activity and changes in the estimated future recoverability of
postretirement and postemployment benefits costs under the Company's backlog of
government contracts. Partially offsetting these increases is the decline in
income from the June 1998 delivery of the aircraft carrier TRUMAN and provisions
for government contract and other matters.

CONSTRUCTION - The $175 million increase in operating earnings is primarily
attributable to the charges recorded in 1997 on the DOUBLE EAGLE product tanker
construction program. This increase is partially offset by lower construction
activity on the aircraft carrier TRUMAN, which was delivered in June 1998.
Contributions from construction activity on the aircraft carrier REAGAN are
comparable for the two years.

<PAGE>

FLEET SERVICES - The $19 million increase in operating earnings is due to higher
levels of refueling and overhaul activity on the aircraft carrier NIMITZ,
increased commercial and government ship repair activity, incremental planning
work on the submarine NARWHAL inactivation, and contributions from CMI. These
increases are partially offset as a result of the delivery of the aircraft
carrier ROOSEVELT in July 1998 after successful completion of EDSRA work.

ENGINEERING - The $2 million increase in operating earnings for Engineering work
reflects the increased volume in aircraft carrier and nuclear engineering
activities, partially offset by favorable contract closeouts in 1997.

RELATED BUSINESSES & OTHER - Other operating losses are not material to either
period.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS                                                    1998          1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                             <C>           <C>

MILLIONS
Net cash provided by operating activities................    $    3        $  105
Capital expenditures.....................................       (26)          (31)
Other investing cash flows...............................       (10)           (3)
                                                             ------        -------

Subtotal.................................................       (33)           71
Financing activities.....................................        33           (69)
                                                             ------        -------

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents................    $    -        $    2
                                                             ======        =======
</TABLE>


NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES - The $102 million decrease in the
1998 comparative cash flows from operating activities is due to an increased
investment in working capital, partially offset by higher operating earnings
discussed above in "1998 Compared to 1997 - Results of Operations, Operating
Earnings." The increase in working capital is caused by normal timing
fluctuations with respect to billings, accounts receivable collections, the
recognition of contract costs, and the payment of trade accounts payable.
Additionally, 1998 reflects higher tax payments due to the recognition of income
previously deferred for tax purposes on the contract for the aircraft carriers
STENNIS and TRUMAN.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - The decrease in capital expenditures in 1998 as compared
to 1997 is attributable to higher expenditures in 1997 related to the completion
of major capital improvement programs, such as the development of a
state-of-the-art automated steel cutting and fabrication facility.

OTHER INVESTING CASH FLOWS -The 1998 and 1997 investing activities primarily
relate to investments in five vessel-owning limited liability companies in
partnership with a U.S. shipping firm, which will own and operate five
commercial product tankers, one of which is under construction by the Company.
Three of the ships were delivered by the Company during the fourth quarter of
1998. The Company delivered a fourth ship in February 1999.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES - In 1998, the Company received $79 million of net proceeds
from borrowing activities and $9 million from issuances of stock. These proceeds
were utilized to purchase company stock, pay off long-term debt, and pay
dividends. In 1997, the Company received $21 million from the issuance of stock.
These funds, as well as those generated from operations, enabled the Company to
pay off long-term debt, purchase Company stock on the open market for employee
benefit plans and treasury stock, and pay an annual dividend of sixteen cents
per share.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES - The Company requires that adequate working
capital be available at all times. While construction and conversion contracts
provide for progress payments, they generally require extensive investment in
contracts in process because of contract progress payment retentions and change
orders. Retentions, generally due upon completion or acceptance of the
contracted work, amounted to $34 million as of December 31, 1998. Change orders,
which make up an appreciable portion of the Company's work, sometimes require
extended periods of negotiation during which time the expended funds are not
available for other uses. In addition, the Company estimates that expenditures
aggregating approximately $18 million will be required after December 31, 1998
to complete planned projects for which substantial commitments have been made.

On November 4, 1996, the Company entered into a $415 million senior credit
facility ("Credit Agreement") which includes a $215 million six-year revolving
credit facility, of which $125 million may be used for advances and letters of
credit and $90 million may be used for standby letters of credit. This Credit
Agreement contains customary financial and restrictive covenants which limit
borrowing capacity under the credit facility. As of December 31, 1998, the
Company had used $87 million of the credit facility for standby letters of
credit and utilized $71 million of the $125 million for advances (See Note 7 -
"Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the Financial Statements of the
Company).

On June 9, 1998, the Company entered into a $75 million 364-Day Revolving Credit
Facility. The proceeds of this facility can be used for general corporate
purposes. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had used $10 million of this
revolving credit facility for advances (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and
Financing Arrangements" to the Financial Statements of the Company).

In June 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia ("the State")approved $98 million in
funding, comprised of $58 million for the Company to construct and $40 million
for the Company to operate the Virginia Advanced Shipbuilding and Carrier
Integration Center ("VASCIC"). The cost to build VASCIC approximates $58
million, which equals the planned construction funding amount from the State.
The Company has no legal obligation to complete the building should the State
not provide full construction funding as contemplated under passed legislation.
The State has funded $8 million to date on this project, which is expected to be
completed in the third quarter of 2001.


INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES

Interest expense is principally generated from the Company's senior notes and
term loan (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the
Financial Statements of the Company). Expense for 1998 is higher than the
previous year due to settlements with the U.S. Government (See Note 13
"Commitments and Contingencies" to the Financial Statements of the Company).

The effective tax rates for 1998 and 1997 are approximately 42% and 35%,
respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate in 1998 as
compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% is principally due to state
income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences for tax.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

During 1998, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board statement
("FAS") No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income". FAS No. 130 establishes
standards for reporting and the display of comprehensive income and its
components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. The Company
does not have any comprehensive income required to be reported based on the
adoption of this new standard in 1998.

During 1998, the Company adopted FAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information". FAS No. 131 establishes standards for
reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements
and requires selected information about operating segments in interim financial
reports issued to stockholders (See Note 15 - "Reportable Segments" to the
Financial Statements of the Company).

In December 1997, the AICPA issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-3,
"Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related
Assessments". The SOP provides, among other things, that an entity recognize a
liability for the present value of estimated future guaranty-fund and other
insurance-related assessments. As the Company has ceded certain workers'
compensation claims to a second-injury fund administered by the U.S. Department
of Labor and is subject to an annual assessment, the Company has elected to
early adopt SOP 97-3 in the fourth quarter of 1998. The adoption of SOP 97-3 did
not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.

<PAGE>

During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company adopted FAS No. 132, "Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits". FAS No. 132
standardizes the disclosure requirements for pensions and other postretirement
benefits to the extent practicable, requires additional information on changes
in the benefit obligations and fair values of plan assets that will facilitate
financial analysis, and eliminates certain disclosures required in the past (See
Note 10 - "Employee Benefit Plans" to the Financial Statements of the Company).

RECENTLY ISSUED STANDARDS

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". This statement
establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative
instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability
measured at its fair value. FAS No. 133 requires that changes in the
derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific
hedge accounting criteria are met. FAS No. 133 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 1999. The Company engages in minimal derivative
activity and therefore the adoption of this new standard is not expected to have
a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.


OTHER MATTERS

YEAR 2000 PLANNING AND PREPARATION

The Company continues to evaluate and prepare for the potential impact of the
"Year 2000" problem on its systems and operations. A Year 2000 plan has been
developed addressing Year 2000 awareness, specific problem identification, risk
and potential impact assessment (including the risk and potential impact of
noncompliance by the Company's suppliers, subcontractors and customers,
including the U.S. Navy), resource allocation, remediation work required,
failure contingencies, and a completion timetable.


The Company's Year 2000 evaluation and remediation plan is dual faceted,
focusing on both information technology ("IT") systems as well as imbedded,
non-IT systems that are integral to specific operating and support functions.
The Company is also installing new hardware and software in connection with its
new "shared data environment," which is expected to help mitigate potential Year
2000 problems.

An oversight committee consisting of members of senior management has been
established. A nationally recognized outside consultant completed a study in
July 1998 of the non-IT component of the Company's Year 2000 exposure. The
results of that study have been reported to the committee and incorporated into
the Company's Year 2000 remediation and contingency plans.

The Company's Year 2000 effort began at the end of 1994 with the identification
and remediation of systems using long lead-time dates. That work was completed
in the middle of 1996. Remediation of the Company's critical IT systems is
expected to be substantially complete in the first quarter of 1999, with the
exception of those being replaced by the initial release of the new "shared data
environment", which will occur in the second quarter of 1999. In addition, two
comprehensive, off-site integration tests of IT applications will be conducted
during the first and third quarters of 1999. It is currently anticipated that
remediation and testing of non-IT systems will be finished by mid-year 1999.

Remediation work and systems testing is being accomplished using a combination
of existing internal Company resources and outsourcing, and is being funded with
cash generated from operations and, if necessary, borrowed under existing credit
facilities. Expenditures, including consulting fees and expenses, have so far
totaled approximately $2 million since inception of the Company's Year 2000
effort in 1994. Approximately $1 million was expended in 1998. It is currently
projected that aggregate expenditures for both IT and non-IT systems remediation
and testing will total approximately $4 to $6 million when finished, based on
the results of the consultant's study of the Company's non-IT systems and on the
Company's continuing risk assessment and remediation planning; however, it
should be noted that the budget continues to develop and may from time to time
be adjusted as more systems functions requiring remediation are identified,
assessed and ranked as to criticality, and appropriate resources are allocated.

<PAGE>

In addition to addressing its own computer systems, the Company has surveyed and
continues to work with its principal teaming partners, subcontractors,
suppliers, and customers (including the U.S. Navy) to promote their Year 2000
compliance, as it may impact on the financial position or results of operations
of the Company. Nevertheless, the Company does not control, and can give no
assurances as to the substance or success of the Year 2000 compliance efforts of
such independent third parties.

In April 1998, surveys were sent to nearly 3,000 key suppliers and
subcontractors. Over 1,000 responses have been received with 100% of those
responding indicating their planned Year 2000 compliance by January 1, 2000.
Follow up letters have been sent to non-responsive subcontractors, as well as to
certain responsive vendors and subcontractors where more substantial assurances
were desired. Alternate strategies are being considered in the case of vendors
and subcontractors that remain unresponsive or that do not provide adequate
assurances of timely readiness.

Management believes that the Company will successfully implement its Year 2000
remediation plan on schedule and that it will be Year 2000 compliant before the
end of 1999. Nevertheless, management believes that there is an uncertain, but
potentially substantial risk that some of its principal customers,
subcontractors, suppliers, and others on whom the Company's finances and
operations depend to a large extent (including the U.S. Navy) will experience
Year 2000 problems that either alone or in the aggregate could materially affect
the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Without
intending to be exhaustive, these risks include the potential inability of key
subcontractors and suppliers to correctly or timely provide necessary services,
materials, and components for the Company's operations; the inability of its
customers to timely or correctly process and pay the Company's invoices; the
inability of lenders, lessors, or other sources of the Company's necessary
capital and liquidity to make funds available to the Company when required; and
the inability of computer systems service providers to maintain the Company's
essential systems due to excessive demand for their services from other clients
experiencing unanticipated or more severe than anticipated Year 2000 problems.
Although the Company is not able to quantify the likelihood that some or all of
these events will come to pass, or their potential effects, consequences could
include delayed production milestones and vessel deliveries, increases in
construction, manufacturing and administrative costs until the problems are
resolved, lost revenues and earnings, lower cash receipts, and delayed or
interrupted cash flow.

In case the Company does experience severe Year 2000 financial or operating
problems, notwithstanding its efforts to avoid or mitigate problems inherent in
its own computer systems or the adverse affects of Year 2000 problems
experienced by third parties on whom it is substantially reliant, the Company is
developing and intends to implement contingency plans. The Company is working in
cooperation with the U.S. Navy and others to ensure continued timely and
accurate payments by the U.S. Navy in the event the U.S. Government experiences
Year 2000 related payment system problems, with the goal of maintaining the
Company's principal source of cash flow uninterrupted and reducing the
likelihood that the Company will have to borrow operating capital. Additionally,
an IT team is being established to quickly respond to Year 2000 call-ins
associated with the Company's affected applications, if any. Implementation of
these contingency plans, as well as identification of other applications
requiring remediation and specific contingency plans will be a principal focus
of the Company throughout the remainder of 1999.

Although no assurances can be given, based on the information presently
available to it, management does not expect the overall costs of the Company's
efforts to correct the Year 2000 problems inherent in its IT and non-IT systems,
or a failure by some of its suppliers, subcontractors and customers to timely
anticipate and correct their Year 2000 computer systems problems, to have a
material adverse affect on the financial position or results of operations of
the Company.

As implementation of the Company's Year 2000 remediation plan progresses, and
more information becomes available to it, the Company expects to periodically
reassess the content of, as well as its strategy for implementing, that plan.
There can be no assurance that the currently estimated costs of implementing its
Year 2000 remediation plan, the schedule for completing its remediation and
contingency preparedness efforts, or the currently estimated impact of the Year
2000 problem on the Company's financial position and results of operations will
not be revised in significant respects at that time based on facts then known to
the Company.

<PAGE>

1997 COMPARED TO 1996

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVENUES                                                                 1997          1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                      <C>             <C>

MILLIONS
Construction..................................................         $   935        $  1,029
Fleet Services................................................             500             625
Engineering...................................................             248             194
Related Businesses & Other....................................              24              22
                                                                       -------        --------

Total.........................................................         $ 1,707        $  1,870
                                                                       =======        ========
</TABLE>


The Company's revenues decreased 8.7% during 1997, declining to $1.71 billion
from $1.87 billion in 1996. The lower revenue level, as detailed in the
following discussion of operations, is driven by Construction and Fleet
Services.

CONSTRUCTION - The $94 million decrease in Construction revenues in 1997 is due
to the absence of submarine construction work, as well as decreases in SEALIFT
conversion and DOUBLE EAGLE product tanker work. These decreases are partially
offset by increased construction activity on the aircraft carrier REAGAN.

FLEET SERVICES - Overhaul and Repair revenues declined substantially in 1997 as
a result of the delivery of the aircraft carrier EISENHOWER in January. The
decrease is partially offset by increased overhaul activity on the aircraft
carrier ROOSEVELT and increased planning work for the aircraft carrier NIMITZ
refueling.

ENGINEERING - Engineering revenues improved in 1997, increasing to $248 million
from $194 million in 1996. Expanded engineering work related to the new attack
submarine (NSSN), as well as increased nuclear and R&D efforts, contributed to
the revenue growth. Requirements for SEAWOLF submarine design work have declined
due to the maturity of the production program for this class of submarines.

RELATED BUSINESSES & OTHER - Revenues from Related Businesses & Other increased
by $2 million in 1997. The higher level of activity in 1997 is due to increased
efforts with respect to valve and pump repairs and other miscellaneous work.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EARNINGS                                                       1997          1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                      <C>            <C>

MILLIONS
Construction..................................................          $  (83)       $   44
Fleet Services................................................              50            88
Engineering...................................................              19            13
Related Businesses & Other....................................              (5)           (5)
                                                                        ------        -------

Total.........................................................          $  (19)       $  140
                                                                        ======        =======
</TABLE>

The operating loss of $19 million in 1997 represents a $159 million decline from
the 1996 level of $140 million in operating earnings. This decline is primarily
attributable to the $207 million of charges against operating earnings on the
DOUBLE EAGLE product tanker construction program. Additionally, the decline is
due to lower Fleet Services income contributions associated with the January
1997 delivery of the aircraft carrier EISENHOWER, and one-time gains in 1996
attributable to the mix of work and maturity of several contracts. Partially
offsetting the decrease is the 1997 improvement in Engineering earnings.

CONSTRUCTION - The $127 million decline in operating earnings on Construction
work in 1997 is a result of the recognition of losses associated with product
tanker construction and lower income contributions from the lack of LOS
ANGELES-class submarine construction work. The decrease is partially offset by
strong carrier contributions, particularly with respect to the REAGAN contract
and the fact that 1996 was significantly impacted by the recognition of losses
associated with SEALIFT conversion work.


FLEET SERVICES - The $38 million decrease in operating earnings for Fleet
Services work in 1997 is a result of the completion of the EISENHOWER overhaul
in January of 1997, and one-time gains in 1996 attributable to the mix of work
and maturity of several contracts. The decrease is partially mitigated by
increased overhaul activity on the ROOSEVELT and planning work for the NIMITZ
refueling.

ENGINEERING - The $6 million increase in operating earnings for Engineering work
reflects the increased volume in nuclear and submarine engineering activities,
as well as favorable contract close-outs.

RELATED BUSINESSES & OTHER - Other operating losses are comparable and not
significant to either period presented.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS                                                               1997          1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>             <C>

MILLIONS
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities..............          $  105        $  (75)
Capital expenditures..........................................             (31)          (74)
Other investing cash flows....................................              (3)          (25)
                                                                        ------        -------

Subtotal......................................................              71          (174)
Financing activities..........................................             (69)          173
                                                                        ------        -------

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents..........          $    2        $   (1)
                                                                        ======        =======
</TABLE>


NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES - The $180 million increase in
the 1997 comparative cash flows from operating activities is due to a decreased
investment in working capital, partially offset by lower operating earnings. The
lower operating earnings are attributable to the factors discussed above in
"1997 Compared to 1996 Results of Operations, Operating Earnings." The decrease
in working capital is caused by normal timing fluctuations and management
initiatives, as well as efforts by the Company to reduce accounts receivable
balances. Additionally, 1997 reflects lower tax payments due to the recognition
of losses previously deferred for tax purposes on commercial tankers.

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - The decrease in capital expenditures in 1997 compared to
1996 is attributable to higher expenditures related to major capital improvement
programs during the prior year. The Company's 1996 capital improvement program
consisted principally of three separate projects: (i) development of a
state-of-the-art automated steel cutting and fabrication facility; (ii)
extension of a dry dock facility; and (iii) construction of the Carrier
Refueling Complex. All three of these projects were substantially complete at
the end of 1996, thus explaining the current period reduction in capital
investments.

OTHER INVESTING CASH FLOWS - Other investing cash flow activities in 1997 and
1996 primarily relate to an investment for a 49% ownership interest in a
vessel-owning limited partnership with a U.S. shipping firm which will own and
operate five commercial product tankers under construction by the Company. In
addition, 1996 also included a $9.6 million investment achieving the Company's
40% equity interest in the Abu Dhabi Ship Building Company.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES - In 1997, the Company received $21 million from the
issuance of stock related to the Company's benefit plans. These funds, as well
as those generated from operations, enabled the Company to pay off long-term
debt, purchase Company stock on the open market for employee benefit plans and
treasury stock, and pay annual dividends of sixteen cents per share. The Company
also used treasury stock to acquire CMI in December 1997 (See Note 5
"Acquisition" to the Financial Statements of the Company). In 1996, the Company
received from its former parent, on a net basis, $149 million to finance
operating cash flow needs and cover costs of its capital improvement program
(See Note 14 - "Transactions With Former Parent Company" to the Financial
Statements of the Company).

<PAGE>

INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES

Prior to the spinoff, corporate debt of the Company's former parent and its
related interest expense were allocated to the Company based upon the ratio of
the Company's net assets to the parent's consolidated net assets plus debt. As
an independent company, the Company's debt level and attendant interest expense
are higher than the historical allocations. As a result, 1997 interest expense
as a separate entity is higher.

The effective tax rates for 1997 and 1996 are approximately 35% and 46%,
respectively. The difference between the Company's effective tax rate in 1996
compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% is principally due to state
income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences for tax.


CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

The Company adopted FAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share," and FAS No. 129,
"Disclosure of Information about Capital Structure," in 1997. The adoption of
these new standards did not have a material impact on the Company's financial
position or results of operations.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

INTEREST RATE RISK

The Company's exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates
primarily to the Company's short-term investment portfolio and the debt
outstanding under the Credit Agreement (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and
Financing Arrangements" and Note 8 - "Financial Instruments" to the Financial
Statements of the Company).

The maturity, credit quality, and security class of the Company's short-term
investment portfolio are limited by both the Credit Agreement and the Company's
investment policy. The Company limits default risk by investing in only the
safest and highest credit quality securities limited to the following: direct
obligations of the United States of America including any governmental entity or
agency, commercial paper with a rating of A-1/P-1 or better, certificates of
deposit issued by major financial institutions, repurchase agreements
collateralized 102% by the aforementioned securities, and money market funds
rated AAAm by Standard & Poors. As stated in its policy, the Company is averse
to principal loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds
by limiting default risk and market risk. Additionally, the Company's investment
policy guidelines limit the credit exposure to any one issue, issuer, and type
of instrument. The Company's Credit Agreement limits the maturity of investments
held in the Company's portfolio to one year or less.

The Company's policy is to manage interest rate risk associated with its
outstanding debt obligations through the use of a combination of fixed and
floating rate debt. With the exception of the Company's Revolving Credit
Facilities (See Note 7 - "Long-Term Debt and Financing Arrangements" to the
Financial Statements of the Company), all other outstanding debt obligations are
fixed. As of December 31, 1998, approximately 64% of the Company's outstanding
debt was fixed-rate debt. Interest rate swaps may be used to adjust interest
exposure when appropriate, based upon market conditions. Additionally, the
Company may use interest rate CAPs to limit the interest rate risk on its
floating-rate debt. All of the Company's outstanding debt obligations are
denominated in U.S. Dollars. As of December 31, 1998, the Company had no
interest-rate derivative contracts outstanding.

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK

Although the majority of the Company's transactions are in U.S. Dollars, the
Company periodically enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to
hedge certain specific transactions associated with the purchase of raw
materials and machinery denominated in a foreign currency. The purpose of
entering into these hedge transactions is to minimize the impact of foreign
currency fluctuations on the results of operations. Such contracts generally
mature in one year or less and the cost of replacing these contracts in the
event of nonperformance by counter parties is not significant. Unrealized gains
and losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized in the results of
operations in the period in which the hedged transaction is consummated. The
Company does not enter into foreign currency contracts for trading purposes. At
December 31, 1998, the Company had no foreign currency contracts outstanding.

<PAGE>


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                            Page
                                                                                                            ----
<S>                                                                                                         <C>

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Public Accountants................................................................      20
Statements of Earnings for each of the three years in the
     period ended December 31, 1998.....................................................................      21
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1997............................................      22
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the
     period ended December 31, 1998.....................................................................      23
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in
     the period ended December 31, 1998.................................................................      24
Notes to Financial
Statements..............................................................................................      25
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. (a Delaware corporation) as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related statements of earnings, cash flows, and changes in stockholders'
equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its operations and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.,
January 26, 1999

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                             STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                  -------------------------

                                                                          1998              1997           1996
                                                                      -------------    -------------    -----------
                                                                     (CONSOLIDATED)    (CONSOLIDATED)   (COMBINED)
<S>                                                                      <C>                <C>             <C>

MILLIONS (EXCEPT SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
REVENUES.........................................................      $     1,862      $     1,707      $    1,870
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES.....................................           (1,687)          (1,729)         (1,729)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE), NET......................................                -                3              (1)
                                                                       -----------      ------------     ---------

OPERATING EARNINGS (LOSS)........................................              175              (19)            140
Interest Expense, net of interest capitalized....................              (61)             (55)            (38)
                                                                       -----------      ------------     ---------

EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES..............................              114              (74)            102
(Provision) Benefit  for Income Taxes............................              (48)              26             (47)
                                                                       -----------      ------------     ---------

NET EARNINGS (LOSS)..............................................      $        66      $       (48)     $       55
                                                                       ===========      ============     ==========


Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
    Basic........................................................       34,677,706       34,741,818      34,297,451
                                                                        ==========      ===========      ==========

    Diluted......................................................       35,794,090       34,741,818      34,297,451
                                                                       ===========      ===========      ==========


Net Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
    Basic........................................................      $      1.91      $     (1.39)      $    1.60
                                                                       ===========      ===========      ==========

    Diluted......................................................      $      1.85      $     (1.39)      $    1.60
                                                                       ===========      ===========      ==========

Dividends Declared Per Common Share..............................      $       .16      $       .16      $       -
                                                                       ===========      ===========      ==========



                    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements of earnings.
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                           CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                         DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                      -------------------
MILLIONS (EXCEPT SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)                                      1998              1997
                                                                                -------------    -------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>           <C>

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and Cash Equivalents....................................................    $     3            $      3
Accounts Receivable..........................................................        143                 136
Contracts in Process.........................................................        334                 259
Inventory....................................................................         52                  44
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................        116                  89
Other Current Assets.........................................................         12                  12
                                                                                 -------            --------

Total Current Assets.........................................................        660                 543
                                                                                 -------            --------

NONCURRENT ASSETS
Property, Plant, and Equipment, net..........................................        763                 816
Other Assets.................................................................        177                 156
                                                                                 -------            --------

Total Noncurrent Assets......................................................        940                 972
                                                                                 -------            --------

                                                                                 $ 1,600            $  1,515
                                                                                 =======            ========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Trade Accounts Payable.......................................................    $   129             $   151
Short-Term Debt..............................................................         38                  30
Postretirement Benefits......................................................        122                 122
Other Accrued Liabilities....................................................        229                 202
                                                                                 -------             -------

Total Current Liabilities....................................................        518                 505
                                                                                 -------             -------

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Long-Term Debt...............................................................        591                 548
Deferred Income Taxes........................................................        235                 238
Other Long-Term Liabilities..................................................         24                  41
Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 13)
                                                                                 -------             -------

Total Noncurrent Liabilities.................................................        850                 827
                                                                                 -------             -------

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock, $.01 par value -
     authorized 70,000,000 shares; issued 35,286,386 shares at
     December 31, 1998, and 34,948,663 shares at December 31, 1997...........          1                   1
Paid-In Capital..............................................................        276                 256
Accumulated Deficit..........................................................         (7)                (68)
Unearned/Deferred Compensation ..............................................         (4)                 (4)
Stock Employee Compensation Trust (SECT).....................................        (34)                  -
Treasury Stock (84,069 shares at December 31, 1997)..........................          -                  (2)
                                                                                 -------             -------
Total Stockholders' Equity...................................................        232                 183
                                                                                 -------             -------

                                                                                 $ 1,600             $ 1,515
                                                                                 =======             =======
</TABLE>

              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                      consolidated balance sheets.

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                   YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                  -------------------------
                                                                          1998              1997           1996
                                                                      -------------    -------------    -----------
                                                                     (CONSOLIDATED)    (CONSOLIDATED)   (COMBINED)
<S>                                                                        <C>              <C>             <C>

MILLIONS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Earnings (Loss)..............................................      $     66      $       (48)      $     55
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings (Loss) to
     Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities -
         Depreciation and Amortization...........................            62               68             65
         Deferred Income Taxes...................................           (30)             (38)           (10)
         Allocated Corporate Interest, net of tax................             -                -             20
         Loss on Asset Dispositions..............................            17                -              -
         Loss On Equity Investments..............................             1                1              2
         Changes in Components of Working Capital -
              Decrease (Increase) in -
                  Accounts Receivable............................            (7)              53           (116)
                  Contracts in Process...........................           (75)             133             (7)
                  Inventory......................................            (8)               1             10
                  Note Receivable................................             -                -             18
                  Other Current Assets...........................             -               (6)            11
              Increase (Decrease) in -
                  Trade Accounts Payable.........................           (22)              23             21
                  Accounts Payable to Former Parent..............             -                -            (67)
                  Other Accrued Liabilities......................            27              (14)           (35)
         Other, net..............................................           (28)             (68)           (42)
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------
Net Cash  Provided (Used) by Operating Activities................             3              105            (75)
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital Expenditures.............................................           (26)             (31)           (74)
Other............................................................           (10)              (3)           (25)
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities............................           (36)             (34)           (99)
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash Transfer from Former Parent.................................             -                -            149
Increase (Decrease) in Revolving Credit Facilities...............            79              (24)            24
Proceeds from Long-Term Debt.....................................             -                -            600
Payments on Long-Term Debt.......................................           (29)             (28)             -
Issuance of Common, Treasury and SECT Shares.....................             9               21              -
Purchase of Common Stock.........................................           (29)             (32)             -
Dividends Paid on Common Stock...................................            (5)              (6)             -
Dividend Paid to Former Parent...................................             -                -           (600)
Other............................................................             8                -              -
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities.................            33              (69)           173
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS.............             -                2             (1)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD.................             3                1              2
                                                                       --------      -----------      ---------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD.......................      $      3      $         3      $       1
                                                                       ========      ===========      =========

CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR INCOME TAXES.....................      $     78      $         8      $     129
                                                                       ========      ===========      =========

CASH PAID DURING THE PERIOD FOR INTEREST.........................      $     55      $        54      $       3
                                                                       ========      ===========      =========
</TABLE>



              The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
                           statements of cash flows.

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                  STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                         Unearned/
                                                      Combined        Common Stock         Paid-In       Accumulated     Deferred
                                                      Equity        Shares       Par       Capital         Deficit      Compensation
                                                     --------       ------       ---       -------         -------      ------------
<S>                                                     <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>              <C>           <C>


MILLIONS, EXCEPT FOR SHARES
Balance - January 1, 1996                      $        272           --    $       --    $       --    $       --     $       --
Net Earnings                                             69           --            --            --            --             --
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent                   149           --            --            --            --             --
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
     Net Change in Allocated Corporate Debt             360           --            --            --            --             --
     Allocated Corporate Interest, net of tax            20           --            --            --            --             --
     Other                                              (24)          --            --            --            --             --
Dividend to Former Parent                              (600)          --            --            --            --             --
Issuance of Common Stock in Connection
     With the Spinoff                                  (246)    34,297,451             1           245          --             --
                                               ------------   ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------   ------------
Balance - December 11, 1996                            --       34,297,451             1           245          --             --
Net Loss                                               --             --            --            --             (14)          --
                                               ------------   ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1996                            --       34,297,451             1           245           (14)          --
Net Loss                                               --             --            --            --             (48)          --
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock                     --             --            --            --              (6)          --
Performance Share Grants                               --             --            --               5          --             --
Purchase of Common Stock                               --             --            --            --            --             --
Issuance of Common, Treasury, and SECT Shares          --          651,212          --               2          --             --
Unearned ESOP/Deferred Compensation                    --             --            --               4          --               (4)
                                               ------------   ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1997                            --       34,948,663             1           256           (68)            (4)
Net Income                                             --             --            --            --              66           --
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock                     --             --            --            --              (5)          --
Performance Share Grants                               --             --            --               8          --             --
Purchase of Common Stock                               --             --            --            --            --             --
Issuance of Common, Treasury, and SECT Shares          --          337,723          --               7          --             --
Adjustment of SECT to Market Value                     --             --            --               5          --             --
                                               ------------   ------------  ------------  ------------  ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1998                    $       --       35,286,386  $          1  $        276  $         (7)  $         (4)
                                               ============   ============  ============  ============  ============   ============

</TABLE>



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Treasury Stock
                                                    SECT             Shares        Amount
                                                    ----             ------        ------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>          <C>


MILLIONS, EXCEPT FOR SHARES
Balance - January 1, 1996                        $       --             --     $       --
Net Earnings                                             --             --             --
Net Cash Transfers from Former Parent                    --             --             --
Non-Cash Transactions with Former Parent
     Net Change in Allocated Corporate Debt              --             --             --
     Allocated Corporate Interest, net of tax            --             --             --
     Other                                               --             --             --
Dividend to Former Parent                                --             --             --
Issuance of Common Stock in Connection
     With the Spinoff                                    --             --             --
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------
Balance - December 11, 1996                              --             --
Net Loss                                                 --             --             --
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1996                              --             --             --
Net Loss                                                 --             --             --
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock                       --             --             --
Performance Share Grants                                 --             --             --
Purchase of Common Stock                                 --        1,448,743            (32)
Issuance of Common, Treasury, and SECT Shares            --       (1,364,674)            30
Unearned ESOP/Deferred Compensation                      --             --             --
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1997                              --           84,069             (2)
Net Income                                               --             --             --
Cash Dividends Paid - Common Stock                       --             --             --
Performance Share Grants                                 --             --             --
Purchase of Common Stock                                  (25)       178,443             (4)
Issuance of Common, Treasury, and SECT Shares              (4)      (262,512)             6
Adjustment of SECT to Market Value                         (5)          --             --
                                                 ------------   ------------   ------------
Balance - December 31, 1998                      $        (34)          --     $       --
                                                 ============   ============   ============

</TABLE>



       The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
            statements of changes in stockholders' equity.

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. became an independent, publicly traded company on
December 12, 1996. Previously, on December 11, 1996, in connection with a
corporate reorganization, the Company's former parent and its subsidiaries
undertook and completed various intercompany transfers and distributions
designed to restructure, divide, and separate their then existing businesses,
assets, liabilities, and operations so that, among other things, the
shipbuilding business of the former parent ("Shipbuilding Business") would be
owned by the Company (as defined below). The former parent subsequently
distributed (the "spinoff") pro rata to holders of the parent company's common
stock all of the outstanding common stock of the Company.

Unless the context otherwise requires, as used herein, the term "Company"
refers: (i) for periods prior to the spinoff to Newport News Shipbuilding and
Dry Dock Company, a Virginia corporation, and certain other subsidiaries through
which its former parent conducted its Shipbuilding Business during such periods,
and (ii) for periods after the spinoff, to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc., a
Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Newport News
Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company. These financial statements represent the
combined operations of the Shipbuilding Business prior to December 12, 1996 and
the consolidated operations of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. and its
subsidiaries thereafter.

Prior to the spinoff, all of the outstanding common stock of the Company was
owned directly or indirectly by the former parent. These financial statements
present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the
Company as if it were a separate entity for all periods. The former parent's
historical basis in the assets and liabilities of the Company has been carried
over.

Investments in 20% to 50% owned companies where the Company has the ability to
exert significant influence over operating and financial policies are carried at
cost plus equity in undistributed earnings since the date of acquisition.
Earnings recognized and distributions received from equity method investees were
not significant during any of the periods presented in the accompanying
financial statements. All significant intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Company is the largest non-government-owned shipyard in the United States.
Its principal business is designing, constructing, repairing, overhauling, and
refueling nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines for the U.S.
Government. The Company's largest single customer is the U.S. Government.
Revenues from contracts with the U.S. Government were $1.7 billion (92%), $1.6
billion (94%), and $1.8 billion (94%) in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.

2. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Companies, such as Newport News Shipbuilding Inc., which are principally engaged
in supplying defense-related products and services to the U.S. Government are
subject to certain business risks specific to that industry. Sales to the U.S.
Government may be affected by changes in procurement policies, budget
considerations, changing concepts of national defense, political developments
abroad, and other factors. The Department of Defense ("DoD") budgets

<PAGE>

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

                    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

have been subject to increasing pressure resulting in uncertainty as to the
future effects of DoD budget cuts. The Company has nonetheless maintained a
steady backlog of contracts with its primary customer, the U.S. Navy. These
factors lead management to believe that there is a high probability that the
Company's current major defense program initiatives will continue.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions in
determining the reported amounts of the Company's assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses. Reference is made to the "Revenue Recognition" section of this
footnote and Notes 10 and 13 for additional information on certain estimates
included in the Company's financial statements. Actual results may differ from
estimates.

CLASSIFICATION

The Company's construction contracts range in duration up to a period of eight
years from the signing of the contract until delivery. Because of the varying
nature of the Company's operating cycle, and consistent with industry practice,
assets and liabilities relating to long-term contracts are classified as
current, although a portion of these amounts is not expected to be realized or
paid within one year (See Note 3).

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain amounts for 1997 have been reclassified to conform with the 1998
classifications.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company reports revenues and profits on its long-term contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting, determined on the basis of total
costs incurred to date to estimated final total costs. Anticipated losses on
contracts are reported when first identified by the Company. Costs on long-term
contracts in process represent recoverable costs incurred for production,
allocable overhead, and, where appropriate, general and administrative expenses.
The performance of contracts usually extends over several years, requiring
periodic reviews and revisions of estimated final contract revenues, costs, and
profits during the terms of the contracts. The effect of these revisions to
estimates is included in earnings in the period the revisions are made. Revenue
arising from the claims process is not recognized either as income or as an
offset against a potential loss until it can be reliably estimated and its
realization is probable.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

General and administrative expenses of $294 million, $263 million, and $279
million in 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively, are included in the "Operating
Costs and Expenses" caption in the Statements of Earnings. Of the total general
and administrative expenses for 1996, $14 million represents the Company's share
of its former parent's general and administrative costs for legal, financial,
communication, and other administrative services. The Company's management
believes that the allocated general and administrative expenses reflected in the
accompanying financial statements are generally representative of the total
general and administrative costs the Company would have incurred as a separate
public entity. General and administrative expenses related to commercial
products and services essentially under commercial terms and conditions are
expensed as incurred. Such charges amounted to $22 million, $31 million, and $16
million for 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively.

<PAGE>

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Research and development costs are charged to "Operating Costs and Expenses" as
incurred. The amounts charged to operations during the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997, and 1996 were $24 million, $38 million, and $42 million,
respectively.

INCOME TAXES

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes whereby it recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future
tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, based upon management's
estimates, it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized in a future period. No deferred tax valuation allowances
were recorded by the Company as of December 31, 1998 and 1997.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND CONTRACTS IN PROCESS

Only amounts billed and currently due from customers are included in the
"Accounts Receivable" caption in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Recoverable costs and accrued earnings related to long-term contracts on which
revenue has been recognized, but for which billings have not been made to the
customer, are included in the "Contracts in Process" caption (See Note 3). No
significant allowance for doubtful accounts existed as of December 31, 1998 and
1997.

INVENTORY

Inventory principally consists of raw materials and supplies which have not been
allocated to specific contracts. Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or
market. Substantially all inventory is costed using the "last-in, first-out"
method. If the first-in, first-out or average cost method of inventory
accounting had been used by the Company for all inventory, inventory would have
been approximately $6 million and $7 million higher at December 31, 1998 and
1997, respectively.

PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property, plant, and equipment is carried at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. The Company provides for depreciation on a straight-line basis in
amounts which, in the opinion of management, are adequate to allocate the cost
of depreciable assets over their estimated useful lives. Estimated useful lives
for significant classes of assets are as follows.

     Buildings.......................................   30 to 60 years
     Machinery and equipment.........................    8 to 45 years

Total depreciation expense was $62 million, $68 million, and $65 million for
1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. Depreciation expense is included as a
component of "Operating Costs and Expenses" in the statements of earnings.

Interest capitalized on constructed assets during the years ended December 31,
1997 and 1996 was $1 million and $3 million, respectively. Interest capitalized
during 1998 was not material.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company utilizes several stock-based compensation plans as an incentive to
its employees (See Note 11). Pursuant to these plans, the Company may grant
stock options, restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights,
stock equivalent units, and dividend equivalent awards. Stock options are
generally awarded with exercise prices equal to the fair value of the Company
stock on the date of grant. As such, the Company does not record compensation
expense with respect to the award of such stock options. All other awards
generally result in the Company recognizing a pro rata portion of compensation
expense based on the vesting period of the award. The compensation expense
recognized generally varies based on the amount by which the current fair value
of the award exceeds the exercise price, if any, of such award.

<PAGE>

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

At December 31, 1998, the Company had authorized (a) 70 million shares of Common
Stock, $.01 par value, of which 35.3 million were issued and 34.2 million were
outstanding, along with associated preferred stock purchase rights, (b) 10
million shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value, none of which had been
issued, and (c) 700,000 shares of Series A participating junior preferred stock,
$.01 par value, none of which had been issued.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

During 1998, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board statement
("FAS") No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income". FAS No. 130 establishes
standards for reporting and the display of comprehensive income and its
components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. The Company
does not have any comprehensive income required to be reported based on the
adoption of this new standard in 1998.

During 1998, the Company adopted FAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information". FAS No. 131 establishes standards for
reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements
and requires selected information about operating segments in interim financial
reports issued to stockholders (See Note 15).

In December 1997, the AICPA issued Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-3,
"Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related
Assessments". The SOP provides, among other things, that an entity recognize a
liability for the present value of estimated future guaranty-fund and other
insurance-related assessments. As the Company has ceded certain workers'
compensation claims to a second-injury fund administered by the U.S. Department
of Labor and is subject to an annual assessment, the Company has elected to
early adopt SOP 97-3 in the fourth quarter of 1998. The adoption of SOP 97-3 did
not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.

During the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company adopted FAS No. 132, "Employers'
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits". FAS No. 132
standardizes the disclosure requirements for pensions and other postretirement
benefits to the extent practicable, requires additional information on changes
in the benefit obligations and fair values of plan assets that will facilitate
financial analysis, and eliminates certain disclosures required in the past (See
Note 10).

In 1997, the Company adopted FAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share". The statement
establishes standards for computing and presenting earnings per share ("EPS").
The statement requires companies to present basic EPS and diluted EPS instead of
the primary and fully diluted EPS that was previously required. Basic EPS is
computed by dividing reported net earnings available to common stockholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. This EPS computation
does not include dilution. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that
could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common
stock that then shared in the net earnings of the Company (See Note 12).

RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

The Company periodically utilizes foreign currency contracts to hedge its
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates for firm purchase
commitments. Net gains or losses on these contracts are deferred and recognized
when the offsetting gains or losses are recognized on the hedged items. Cash
receipts or payments related to these financial instruments are classified
consistent with the cash flows from the transactions being hedged. As of
December 31, 1998, the Company had no interest-rate derivative contracts
outstanding.

<PAGE>

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION

Financial statements of equity investments in international entities are
translated into U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date
for assets and liabilities and the weighted-average exchange rate for each
applicable period for amounts included in the statements of earnings. The amount
of cumulative translation adjustments is not material.

STOCK EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION TRUST (SECT)

In December 1997, the Company established a SECT to fund a portion of its
obligations arising from its various employee compensation and benefit plans.
The Company issued shares to the SECT from treasury stock and the SECT engages
in open market purchases. The SECT has a twenty year life. At December 31, 1998,
the SECT held 1.0 million shares of the Company's common stock.

3. CONTRACTS IN PROCESS

Contracts in process consist of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            DECEMBER 31,
                                                                           --------------
                                                                        1998           1997
                                                                     ---------       ---------
<S>                                                                     <C>             <C>

MILLIONS
Contract costs and estimated profits............................   $     2,310     $     3,806
Other costs.....................................................            66               -
Less advances and progress payments.............................        (2,042)         (3,547)
                                                                   ------------    -----------
                                                                   $       334     $       259
                                                                   ===========     ===========

</TABLE>


Contracts in process includes production costs and related overhead, including
general and administrative expenses allocable to U.S. Government contracts, net
of progress payments of $2.0 billion and $3.5 billion as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, respectively. Other costs include amounts recorded under Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") that are not currently allocable to
contracts, such as a portion of the Company's postretirement and postemployment
benefits, and SOP 97-3 workers' compensation related costs. These costs have
been deferred because their recognition under government contracts is considered
probable based on existing backlog. If the level of backlog in the future does
not support the continued deferral of these costs, profitability of the
Company's remaining contracts could be affected. Also included in other costs
are provisions established for certain government contract and other matters.

The increase in other costs included in contracts in process is primarily due to
the adoption of SOP 97-3 (See Note 2 ) along with a change in the estimated
future recoveries of postretirement and postemployment benefit costs of
approximately $55 million, partially offset by additional provisions established
for developments on certain government contract and other matters. Approximately
$22 million and $14 million of retainages included in contracts in process, as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively, are not expected to be billed and
collected within one year.

<PAGE>

4. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT, NET

The major classes of property, plant, and equipment are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                   DECEMBER 31,
                                                                               --------------------
                                                                                1998         1997
                                                                               ------        ------
<S>                                                                              <C>          <C>

MILLIONS
Land and improvements.....................................................     $   26       $    28
Buildings and improvements................................................      1,154         1,176
Machinery and equipment...................................................        428           430
                                                                               ------       -------
     Property, plant, and equipment at cost...............................      1,608         1,634
Less accumulated depreciation.............................................       (845)         (818)
                                                                               ------       -------
     Net property, plant, and equipment...................................     $  763       $   816
                                                                               ======       =======

</TABLE>

5. ACQUISITION

On December 18, 1997, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock
of Continental Maritime Industries, Inc. ("CMI"), a ship repair yard in San
Diego, California. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase, and
accordingly, the results of operations of CMI for the period from the date of
the acquisition through December 31, 1998 are included in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. The purchase price was allocated to assets
and liabilities based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. At
closing, as defined in the agreement and plan of reorganization, CMI was
acquired through the issuance of 497,031 shares of the Company's common stock.
The excess of purchase price over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired
of $3.9 million was recorded as goodwill and is being amortized over 15 years.


6. DETAIL OF OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES


Other accrued liabilities consist of the following:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  DECEMBER 31,
                                                                              ---------------------
                                                                               1998         1997
                                                                              ------        -----
<S>                                                                              <C>         <C>

MILLIONS
Billings in excess of costs and profits..................................     $   62       $    96
Workers' compensation....................................................         57             -
Postemployment benefits..................................................         52            49
Employee payroll and benefits............................................         35            33
Other....................................................................         23            24
                                                                              ------       -------
                                                                              $  229       $   202
                                                                              ======       =======
</TABLE>



The liability associated with the adoption of SOP 97-3 is included in accrued
workers' compensation (See Note 2).

<PAGE>

7. LONG-TERM DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

LONG-TERM DEBT

A summary of long-term debt obligations of the Company at December 31, 1998 and
1997 is set forth in the following table:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       --------------------------
         MILLIONS                                                        1998              1997
                                                                       ---------        ---------
<S>                                                                      <C>                <C>

         8.625% Senior Notes due December 1, 2006                      $     200        $     200
         9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due December 1, 2006                200              200
         Term Loan due November 4, 2002                                      145              172
         Bank Notes due April 30, 2002                                         3                4
         Six Year Revolving Credit Facility due November 4, 2002              71                -
         Revolving Credit Facility due June 1, 2000                            -                2
         364 - Day Revolving Credit Facility due June 9, 1999                 10                -
         Less Current Maturities                                             (38)             (30)
                                                                       ---------        ---------
                                                                       $     591        $     548
                                                                       =========        =========

</TABLE>


SENIOR AND SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES

On November 26, 1996, the Company issued $200 million of 8.625% Senior Notes and
$200 million of 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes which both pay interest
semi-annually. The Company is obligated to repay these notes on December 1,
2006.

SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY

On November 4, 1996, the Company entered into a $415 million senior credit
facility (the "Senior Credit Facility") consisting of a $200 million six-year
amortizing term loan (the "Term Loan") and a $215 million six-year revolving
credit facility (the "Six Year Revolving Credit Facility"). The Term Loan will
amortize in 24 quarterly installments, commencing March 31, 1997, with an annual
aggregate payment amount of $27.5 million in each of 1997 through 2001, and
$62.5 million in 2002. Of the Six Year Revolving Credit Facility, $125 million
may be used for advances and letters of credit and $90 million may be used only
for standby letters of credit. Generally, each of the Company's present and
future subsidiaries having consolidated assets exceeding $10 million, excluding
foreign subsidiaries and NNS Tanker Holding Corporation (each, a "Guarantor" and
collectively, the "Guarantors") guarantee the Senior Credit Facility. Borrowings
under the Senior Credit Facility are secured by perfected liens on substantially
all of the Company's and the Guarantors' assets (except CMI). The security
interest in the collateral may be released if the Company meets specific
financial and other conditions.

TERM LOAN

The interest rates on the Term Loan vary based on the one, two, three, six,
nine, and twelve month LIBOR plus 1.125% or a base rate. The base rate is
defined as the higher of prime (as defined in the credit facility) or the
federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The weighted-average Term Loan interest rate at
December 31, 1998 was 6.34%.

BANK NOTES

The Company also has bank notes maturing through April 30, 2002 totaling $3
million. These notes are secured by the consolidated assets of CMI and its
subsidiary, and at December 31, 1998, accrued interest at a rate of 7.32%. The
aggregate maturities applicable to the outstanding bank notes are approximately
$1 million in 1999 through 2001 with a small remainder due in 2002.

<PAGE>

REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                       COMMITTED CREDIT FACILITY
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      TERM           COMMITMENTS        UTILIZED         AVAILABLE
                                                    ---------        -----------        --------         ---------
<S>                                                   <C>              <C>                <C>               <C>

(As of December 31, 1998)
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility                  1996-2002            $215              $158             $57
Revolving Credit Facility                           1998-2000               3                 -               3
364-Day Revolving Credit Facility                   1998-1999              75                10              65
</TABLE>



The Six Year Revolving Credit Facility requires the payment of commitment fees
of .3% on the unused portion of the credit facility. The interest rate for the
Six Year Revolving Credit Facility can vary as described above with respect to
the Term Loan. The weighted-average six year revolver interest rate at December
31, 1998 was 6.81%. At December 31, 1998, $87 million was utilized for standby
letters of credit and $71 million was borrowed to fund operating needs.

Interest would have been calculated at the rate of 7.75% if a Revolving Credit
Facility balance had existed on December 31, 1998.

On June 9, 1998, the Company entered into a $75 million 364-Day Revolving Credit
Facility ("364-Day Revolving Credit Facility"). The commitments under this
facility can be used for general corporate purposes. Generally, each of the
Company's present and future subsidiaries having consolidated assets exceeding
$10 million, excluding foreign subsidiaries and NNS Tanker Holding Corporation
(each, a "Guarantor" and collectively, the" Guarantors") guarantee the facility.
Borrowings under the facility are secured by perfected liens on substantially
all of the Company's and the Guarantors' assets (except CMI). The security
interest in the collateral may be released if the Company meets specific
financial and other conditions. The 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility requires
the payment of commitment fees of .275% on the unused portion of the credit
facility. The interest rate for the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility can vary
as described above with respect to the Term Loan. The weighted-average 364-Day
revolver interest rate at December 31, 1998 was 6.08%. Amounts borrowed under
the 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility of $10 million were used to fund
operations of the Company.

DEBT COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS

The Senior Credit Facility, 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility, Senior Notes,
Senior Subordinated Notes, and Bank Notes contain customary covenants, including
financial ratios and limitations on dividend payments, indebtedness, liens, and
corporate transactions. Debt outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility and
the Bank Notes are secured by substantially all assets of the Company as
described above.

<PAGE>


8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Company's financial
instruments by class are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                 -------------------
                                                                           1998                       1997
                                                                  ----------------------     ----------------------
                                                                   CARRYING       FAIR       CARRYING       FAIR
                                                                    AMOUNT        VALUE       AMOUNT        VALUE
                                                                ---------    ---------    ---------   ----------

<S>                                                                   <C>          <C>         <C>           <C>

         MILLIONS
         Asset (liability) instruments:
              Cash and cash equivalents                           $       3     $      3     $      3     $       3
              Accounts receivable                                       143          143          136           136
              Trade accounts payable                                   (129)        (129)        (151)         (151)
              Debt (including current maturities)
                  Senior and Senior Subordinated Notes                 (400)        (423)        (400)         (416)
                  Term Loan                                            (145)        (145)        (172)         (172)
                  Bank Notes                                             (3)          (3)          (4)           (4)
                  Six Year Revolving Credit Facility                    (71)         (71)           -             -
                  One Year Revolving Credit Facility                      -            -           (2)           (2)
                  364-Day Revolving Credit Facility                     (10)         (10)           -             -
         Instruments with off-balance sheet risk:
              Foreign currency contracts                                  -            -            -             -
</TABLE>


The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts
payable in the above table was considered to be the same as, or determined not
to be materially different from, the carrying amount. The fair value of
short-term and long-term debt reflected in the December 31, 1998 and 1997
balance sheets are based on the market value of debt with the same or similar
maturities and interest rates.

The Company periodically utilizes foreign currency contracts to hedge certain
specific foreign currency transactions, principally the purchase of raw
materials and machinery denominated in a foreign currency. Such contracts
generally mature in one year or less and the cost of replacing these contracts
in the event of nonperformance by counterparties is not significant. At December
31, 1998 and 1997, the Company had no significant foreign currency contracts
outstanding.

9. INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rates for 1998, 1997, and 1996 were approximately 42%, 35%,
and 46%, respectively. The differences between the Company's effective tax rate
in 1998 and 1996 as compared to the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% are
principally due to state income taxes and miscellaneous permanent differences
for tax.

In 1996, in connection with the spinoff, the Company entered into a tax sharing
agreement with its former parent company and El Paso Natural Gas Company. The
tax sharing agreement provides, among other things, for the allocation of tax
liabilities among the parties to the spinoff arising prior to, as a result of,
and subsequent to the spinoff. Generally, the Company is liable for taxes
imposed on the Company and its affiliates engaged in the Shipbuilding Business.
In the case of federal income taxes imposed on the combined activities of the
consolidated group of the Company's former parent, the Company is liable for
federal income taxes attributable to its activities, and has been allocated an
agreed-upon share of estimated tax payments made by the consolidated group of
the Company's former parent.

The Company's earnings before income taxes were principally domestic for all
years presented in the accompanying financial statements. Following is a
comparative analysis of the components of the (provision) benefit for income
taxes:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                        ------------------------

                                                                                       1998       1997       1996
                                                                                      -------    -----      -----
<S>                                                                                      <C>      <C>        <C>
MILLIONS
Current-
         Federal.................................................................     $  (62)    $  (12)    $  (49)
         State...................................................................        (10)         -         (8)
                                                                                      -------    -------    -------
              Total Current Tax Provision........................................        (72)       (12)       (57)
                                                                                      -------    -------    -------

Deferred-
         Federal.................................................................         23         33         15
         State...................................................................          1          5         (5)
                                                                                      -------    -------    -------
              Total Deferred Tax Benefit.........................................         24         38         10
                                                                                      -------    -------    -------

Total Income Tax (Provision) Benefit.............................................    $   (48)    $   26    $   (47)
                                                                                      =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

Current federal income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 1996 includes
tax benefits of $11 million related to the allocation of corporate interest
expense to the Company from its former parent (See Note 14). The following is a
reconciliation of income taxes computed using the statutory U.S. federal income
tax rate (35% for all years presented) to the (provision) benefit for income
taxes reflected in the statements of earnings:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                         -------------------------
                                                                                       1998       1997       1996
                                                                                      -------    -----      -----
<S>                                                                                    <C>         <C>        <C>

MILLIONS
Tax expense computed at the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate................    $  (40)    $    26    $  (36)
State and local taxes on income, net of federal benefit...........................        (4)          3        (4)
Permanent differences.............................................................        (4)         (3)       (7)
                                                                                      -------    -------    -------
                                                                                      $  (48)    $    26    $  (47)
                                                                                      =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>


Under FAS No. 109, deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Actual tax
liabilities are lower than tax expense reflected above for 1998 by $6 million as
a result of the stock option deduction benefits recorded as a credit to
stockholders' equity. The components of the Company's net deferred tax liability
are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                                 -------------------
                                                                                                  1998        1997
                                                                                                 ------      ------
<S>                                                                                                <C>        <C>
MILLIONS
Deferred tax assets-
         Long-term shipbuilding contracts....................................................    $    44    $    18
         Postretirement benefits.............................................................         14         33
         Postemployment benefits.............................................................         12         15
         Accrued vacation....................................................................          5          5
         Workers' compensation...............................................................          3          -
         Other...............................................................................         43         21
                                                                                                 -------    -------
              Total deferred tax assets......................................................        121         92
                                                                                                 -------    -------
Deferred tax liabilities-
         Tax over book depreciation..........................................................        165        174
         Pension.............................................................................         49         45
         Other...............................................................................         26         22
                                                                                                 -------    -------
              Total deferred tax liabilities.................................................        240        241
                                                                                                 -------    -------

Net deferred tax liabilities.................................................................    $   119    $   149
                                                                                                 =======    =======

</TABLE>


10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company provides defined pension benefits and postretirement benefits to
employees. The following is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations, plan
assets, and funded status of the Company's plans:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Other
                                                          Pension Benefits               Postretirement Benefits
                                                         ------------------            --------------------------

CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION (IN MILLIONS)              1998           1997                1998           1997
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>                 <C>            <C>


Benefit obligation - beginning of period             $     357       $    156           $     194       $    188
Service costs                                               30             25                   2              2
Interest costs                                              27             20                  15             14
Actuarial (gains) losses                                    70             65                   1              8
Benefits paid                                              (10)            (8)                (18)           (18)
Plan amendments                                             (1)             -                   -              -
Curtailments/settlements                                     1              -                   -              -
Initial benefit obligation for new plans                     2             99                   -              -
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
Benefit obligation - end of period                   $     476       $    357           $     194       $    194
                                                     =========       ========           =========       ========
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Other
                                                          Pension Benefits                Postretirement Benefits
                                                        --------------------             ------------------------
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS (IN MILLIONS)                     1998           1997                1998           1997
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>                 <C>            <C>
Fair value of plan assets - beginning of period      $     410       $    325           $       -       $      -
Actual return on plan assets                                17             78                   -              -
Employer contributions                                      31             15                   -              -
Benefits paid                                              (10)            (8)                  -              -
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
Fair value of plan assets - end of period            $     448       $    410           $       -       $      -
                                                     =========       ========           =========       ========

</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Other
                                                          Pension Benefits                Postretirement Benefits
                                                        ---------------------            -------------------------
FUNDED STATUS RECONCILIATION (IN MILLIONS)              1998           1997                1998           1997
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>                 <C>            <C>


Funded status of the plans                           $     (28)      $     53           $    (194)       $  (194)
Contribution adjustment                                      8              8                   -              -
Amounts not recognized                                     (32)           (58)                  -              -
Unrecognized net actuarial losses                           93             29                  80             84
Unrecognized prior service costs                            85             91                  (8)           (12)
Unrecognized transition obligation                         (20)           (22)                  -              -
                                                     ---------       --------           ---------       --------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit costs                      $     106       $    101           $    (122)       $  (122)
                                                     =========       ========           =========       ========

</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               Other
                                                    Pension Benefits                  Postretirement Benefits
                                                   -------------------               -------------------------
Assumptions at December 31,                    1998       1997       1996           1998       1997       1996
                                            ---------  ---------  ---------       --------   --------   --------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>            <C>            <C>       <C>       <C>
Discount rate                                   6.75%      7.50%      7.75%          6.75%      7.50%      7.75%
Expected return on plan assets                 10.00%     10.00%     10.00%            N/A        N/A        N/A
Rate of compensation increase                   4.50%      4.40%      4.90%          4.50%      4.40%      4.90%

</TABLE>


Net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs include the
following components:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                               Other
                                                    Pension Benefits                  Postretirement Benefits
                                                  --------------------               -------------------------
MILLIONS                                       1998       1997       1996           1998       1997       1996
                                            ---------  ---------  ---------       --------   --------   --------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>                 <C>       <C>       <C>


Service cost                                $      30  $      25  $      33       $      2   $      2   $      4
Interest cost                                      27         20         66             15         14         15
Expected return on plan assets                    (37)       (30)       (90)             -          -          -
Amortization of transition assets                  (3)        (4)        (9)             -          -          -
Amortization of prior service costs                 8          8          1             (3)        (4)        (4)
Amortization of loss                                1          -          -              5          4          5
                                            ---------  ---------  ---------       --------   --------   --------
Net periodic cost                           $      26  $      19  $       1       $     19   $     16   $     20
                                            =========  =========  =========       ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


PENSION BENEFITS

The Company has various defined benefit plans which cover substantially all of
its hourly and salaried employees. The hourly plan benefits are based primarily
on service with the Company as an hourly employee. The salaried plan benefits
are based on years of participation and final average compensation. The
Company's funding policies are to contribute to the plans amounts necessary to
satisfy the funding requirements of federal laws and regulations. Plan assets
consist principally of listed equity and fixed income securities.

Certain salaried employees of the Company participated in the former parent's
retirement plan ("FPRP") prior to the spinoff. In connection with the spinoff,
the Company's former parent became the sole sponsor of the FPRP. The benefits
accrued by Company employees in the FPRP were frozen as of December 31, 1996,
and the Company's former parent amended the FPRP to provide that all benefits
accrued through that day by Company employees were fully vested,
non-forfeitable, and the responsibility of the Company's former parent.

Assets of one plan may not be utilized to pay benefits of other plans.
Additionally, the pension cost has been recorded based upon certain actuarial
estimates. These estimates are subject to revision in future periods given new
facts or circumstances. The net prepaid pension cost at December 31, 1998 is
composed of a $124 million prepaid hourly pension plan asset and an $18 million
accrued salaried pension plan liability. The net balance at December 31, 1997
represents a $112 million prepaid hourly pension plan asset and an $11 million
accrued salary pension plan liability.

The Company measures pension cost according to independent actuarial valuations.
The projected unit credit actuarial cost method is used to determine pension
cost for financial accounting purposes consistent with the provisions of FAS No.
87, "Employers' Accounting for Pensions." Unrecognized prior service obligations
are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining
estimated service period of employees expected to receive benefits under the
plans.

OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company has postretirement health care and life insurance plans which cover
its employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. For salaried employees,
the plans cover employees retiring from the Company on or after attaining age 55
who have had at least 10 years of service with the Company after attaining age
45. For hourly employees, the postretirement benefit plans generally cover
employees who retire pursuant to one of the Company's hourly employee retirement
plans. All of these benefits may be subject to deductibles, copayment
provisions, and other limitations, and the Company has reserved the right to
modify these benefits. The Company's postretirement benefit plans are funded on
a pay-as-you-go basis.

The initial weighted average assumed health care cost trend rate used in
determining the 1998 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 8%,
gradually declining to 5% in 2006 and remaining at that level thereafter. The
initial weighted average assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining
the 1997 accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 7%, declining to 5%
in 2004 and remaining at that level thereafter. The initial weighted average
assumed health care cost trend rate used in determining the 1996 accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation was 6%, declining to 5% in 1997 and remaining
at that level thereafter.

Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one percentage point in
each year would increase accumulated postretirement benefit obligations by
approximately $7 million in 1998 and 1997 and $10 million in 1996, and would
increase the aggregate of the service cost and interest cost components of the
net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 1998, 1997, and 1996 by
approximately $1 million each year.

The accrued postretirement benefits cost has been recorded based upon certain
actuarial estimates. These estimates are subject to revision in future periods
given new facts or circumstances.

<PAGE>

401(K) PLANS

The Company sponsors the Newport News Shipbuilding Savings 401(k) Plan for Union
Eligible Employees (the "Savings Plan") for certain of its hourly employees.
Contributions are made to the Savings Plan by participants, with the Company
providing for administration of the Savings Plan.

Subsequent to the spinoff, the Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding
Inc. 401(k) Investment Plan for Salaried Employees ("Salaried Plan"). Beginning
in 1997, the Company matched one half of the first 8% of a participant's
contribution in either cash or Common Stock at the Company's discretion. In
addition, the Company contributes a fixed percentage of each salaried employee's
salary per pay period in either cash or Common Stock, also at the Company's
discretion. The expense related to this plan was $22 million for 1998 and $21
million for 1997. The Company has authorized 3,700,000 shares of Common Stock
for possible Salaried Plan contributions. Company employees as of the spinoff
are fully vested in future matching contributions; otherwise, matching
contributions will vest after two years of service as defined in the Salaried
Plan.

ESOP

CMI (See Note 5) maintains a leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")
for substantially all of its employees. CMI makes annual contributions to the
ESOP equal to the ESOP's debt service. The ESOP Series A Preferred stock shares
initially were pledged as collateral for its debt. The ESOP Series A Preferred
stock was exchanged for the Company's common stock concurrent with the
acquisition of CMI. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral
and allocated to active employees based on the proportion of debt service paid
in the year. As shares are released from collateral, CMI reports compensation
expense equal to the current market price of the shares. ESOP compensation
expense was immaterial for the period subsequent to the acquisition in 1997 and
for 1998. The ESOP shares on December 31, 1998 were as follows:

Allocated shares                                                  148,171
Unallocated shares                                                 49,197
                                                             ------------
Total ESOP shares                                                 197,368
                                                             ============
Fair value of unallocated shares at December 31, 1998        $  1,645,025
                                                             ============

11. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase and Accumulation Plan ("Employee Stock Purchase Plan") to provide
eligible employees of the Company an opportunity to purchase shares of the
Company at a 15% discount, not to exceed $21,250 in payroll deductions per
employee per calendar year. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan became effective
January 1, 1998, as an amended and restated version of a predecessor plan, the
Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee
Stock Purchase Plan authorizes a maximum aggregate of 2,600,000 shares to be
issued under the plan. Of these shares, 1,300,000 shares have been approved for
issuance by the shareholders. The remaining 1,300,000 shares will not be issued
under the plan until shareholder approval is sought and obtained. The Company
plans to seek approval for the issuance of up to an additional 150,000 shares
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan at its 1999 Annual Meeting of
shareholders. During 1998, employees purchased approximately 460,000 shares
under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

The Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan
("Stock Ownership Plan") for the benefit of officers and key employees. At the
Company's discretion, restricted stock, performance shares, stock options, stock
appreciation rights, stock equivalent units and dividend equivalents can be
granted to eligible employees pursuant to this plan. The Company has authorized
5,250,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance under this plan. In 1998,
approximately 625,000 stock options were granted. Further, approximately 463,000
performance shares, stock incentive grants, and restricted shares were awarded
in 1998. As of December 31, 1998, approximately 695,000 shares remained
available for issuance under this plan.

<PAGE>

The Company established the 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. ("1997 Stock Plan for Directors"). Under the plan as
originally adopted, one-half of the annual retainer of non-employee directors is
to be paid in restricted stock. In addition, non-employee directors receive an
initial grant of 2,000 stock options and 1,000 shares of restricted stock upon
joining the Board of Directors, and an annual grant of 1,000 stock options. The
1997 Stock Plan for Directors was amended, effective December 15, 1998, to
increase the annual grant of stock options to 2,000, and to make 50% of the
first $25,000 of the annual retainer payable in restricted stock and any annual
retainer amounts in excess of $25,000 payable in either restricted stock or
cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee. The Company has authorized
75,000 shares for issuance under the plan. During 1998, approximately 6,000
stock options and 2,800 shares of restricted stock were granted under the plan.
As of December 31, 1998, nearly 41,000 shares remained available for issuance.

The Company established stock option plans for its active hourly employees
("Hourly Option Plans") to provide eligible employees of the Company an
opportunity to purchase shares of the Company. The Company authorized 1,100,000
shares of Common Stock for issuance under the Hourly Option Plans. During 1997,
approximately 985,000 stock options were granted under the plans.

The Company established the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan ("1998 Stock Incentive Plan"), effective October 12, 1998. The Company, at
its discretion, may select any employee of the Company for an award of
restricted stock, performance shares, or stock options under the Plan. In
addition, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan assumed the obligation of the Hourly
Option Plans. The options granted under the Hourly Option Plans continue to be
exercisable subject to the same terms and conditions as prescribed by those
plans. The Company has authorized 4,000,000 shares for issuance under the 1998
Stock Incentive Plan. This authorization includes 1,000,000 of the shares
originally reserved for issuance under the Hourly Options Plans and reflects the
transfer of the stock options previously granted under those plans to the 1998
Stock Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 1998, approximately 925,000 options
originally issued under the Hourly Option Plans remained outstanding. No other
shares were issued under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan during 1998 and nearly
3,000,000 shares remained for issuance under the plan as of December 31, 1998.

Stock options and restricted shares applicable to the plans above vest in
accordance with vesting periods set forth in the governing award agreements and
plan documents. The performance shares vest after specified periods and after
attaining certain performance measures, both of which vary with each grant.

Stock option activity and exercise prices for the Stock Ownership Plan, the 1997
Stock Plan for Directors, and the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan are summarized as
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                      --------------------
                                                              DECEMBER 31, 1998    DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                                              ----------------     -----------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                 <C>

       NUMBER OF SHARES UNDER STOCK OPTIONS:
       Outstanding at beginning of year                             3,562,663                  -
              Converted                                                     -          2,143,979
              Granted                                                 629,663          1,871,350
              Exercised                                              (467,833)          (391,678)
              Options canceled                                        (57,250)           (60,988)
                                                              ---------------      -------------

       Outstanding at end of year                                   3,667,243          3,562,663
                                                              ---------------      -------------

       Exercisable at end of year                                   1,254,328            983,975
                                                              ===============      =============
</TABLE>


<PAGE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                     --------------------

                                                              DECEMBER 31, 1998    DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                                              -----------------    -----------------
<S>                                                                  <C>               <C>
       WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE:
       Outstanding at beginning of year                              $  17.54          $       -
              Converted                                                     -              14.65
              Granted                                                   24.85              20.21
              Exercised                                                 14.78              14.87
              Options canceled                                          19.39              14.99

       Outstanding at end of year                                       19.12              17.54

       Exercisable at end of year                                       14.63              14.89

</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          NUMBER                  WEIGHTED AVERAGE
          RANGE OF                    OUTSTANDING AT                  REMAINING           WEIGHTED AVERAGE
     EXERCISE PRICES                 DECEMBER 31, 1998            CONTRACTUAL LIFE         EXERCISE PRICE
     ---------------                 ------------------           ----------------        -----------------
     <S>                                   <C>                          <C>                      <C>

     $ 12.95 - 19.88                          2,075,895               7.0 years              $   14.71
       24.81 - 27.68                          1,591,348               8.9 years                  24.87
                                   --------------------
                                              3,667,243               7.8 years                  19.12
                                   ====================

</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          NUMBER
          RANGE OF                    EXERCISABLE AT              WEIGHTED AVERAGE
     EXERCISE PRICES                 DECEMBER 31, 1998             EXERCISE PRICE
     ---------------                 -----------------             --------------
<S>                                     <C>                           <C>

     $ 12.95 - 19.88                           1,252,564              $  14.62
       24.81 - 27.68                               1,764                 25.80
                                   ---------------------
                                               1,254,328                 14.63
                                   =====================

</TABLE>

In 1996, the Company adopted the disclosure-only option of FAS No. 123 for its
stock option plans. As of December 31, 1996, the Company's employees held
certain options in stock of the former parent that were converted to the
Company's Common Stock in early 1997 (See Note 14). For 1998 and 1997, had the
compensation costs for stock options and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan been
determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under these
plans consistent with the method of FAS No. 123, the Company's net income and
basic net income per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                              DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                             --------------
                                                                                           1998         1997
                                                                                        ---------     ---------
<S>                                                                                         <C>            <C>

MILLIONS
Net Earnings (Loss)
     As reported......................................................................    $   66       $   (48)
     Pro forma........................................................................        60           (53)

Basic Net Earnings (Loss) per share
     As reported......................................................................    $ 1.91       $ (1.39)
     Pro forma........................................................................      1.74         (1.53)
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per share
     As reported......................................................................    $ 1.85       $ (1.39)
     Pro forma........................................................................      1.69         (1.53)

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

All options issued by the Company were issued at the estimated fair value in
effect at the date of issuance, vest ratably over the applicable vesting period,
and expire ten years after the grant date with the exception of one plan under
which the options vest two years after the award date. The fair value for
options granted in 1998 and 1997 are estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions used: dividend
yield of .48% and .66% in 1998 and 1997, respectively; expected volatility of
25% in both 1998 and 1997; risk-free interest rates ranging from 4.6% to 5.4% in
1998 and 5.7% to 6.5% in 1997; and, expected life of one year after the vesting
period for both 1998 and 1997. The assumptions used for the fair value of the
employee purchase rights from the Employee Stock Purchase Plan are the same as
above with the exception that the dividend yield calculated at the date of grant
is .48% and 1.09% for 1998 and 1997, respectively, and the average life of each
purchase right was assumed to be 90 days for both years.

12. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

In 1997, the Company adopted FAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings
per common share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings
per share is calculated based on the basic weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, plus additional shares representing stock distributable
under stock-based plans computed using the treasury stock method. Because 1997
results reflect a loss, basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated
based on the same weighted average number of shares outstanding. There were no
stock options and other common stock equivalents for 1996. Since the Company was
a wholly-owned subsidiary of its former parent prior to the spinoff, there are
no comparable shares outstanding for the period before the spinoff.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1998
                                                                  -----------------------------
                                                              NET                           PER SHARE
                                                            EARNINGS         SHARES           AMOUNT
                                                            --------         ------         --------
<S>                                                            <C>              <C>              <C>

MILLIONS, EXCEPT FOR SHARES AND PER SHARE DATA
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
Income available to common stockholders                    $      66       34,677,706       $    1.91
                                                                                            =========

Stock Options and Other Common
     Stock Equivalents                                             -        1,116,384
                                                           ---------      -----------

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Income available to common stockholders                    $      66       35,794,090       $    1.85
                                                           =========      ===========       =========
</TABLE>



13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING

As a general practice in the defense industry, the Defense Contract Audit Agency
(the "DCAA") and other government agencies continually review the cost
accounting and other practices of government contractors, including the Company,
conduct other investigations, and make specific inquiries. In the course of
those reviews and investigations, cost accounting and other issues are
identified, discussed and settled, or resolved through legal proceedings. In
some cases, recognition of the vagaries of litigation results in management
deciding to settle a matter irrespective of the merits of the Company's
position.

As with other government contractors, the U.S. Government has from time to time
recommended that certain of the Company's contract prices be reduced, or costs
allocated to its government contracts be disallowed. Some of these
recommendations involve substantial amounts. In the past, as a result of such
audits and other investigations and inquiries, the Company has on occasion
agreed to adjustments to its contract prices and the costs allocated to its
government contracts. The Company is currently involved in several such audit
and other investigative proceedings with the U.S. Government. The Company is
also engaged in settlement discussions on certain matters and has filed a
lawsuit concerning certain cost accounting issues.

<PAGE>

During 1996, 1997, and 1998 the Company and its former parent received letters
from the DCAA inquiring about certain aspects of the spinoff, including the
disposition of the former parent's retirement plan (the "FPRP"), which covers
salaried employees of the Company. Negotiations with the U.S. Government
resulted in a settlement of FPRP issues in January 1999. The settlement did not
have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.

As previously reported, the DCAA conducted a post-award audit of the contract to
build the aircraft carrier REAGAN. In April 1998 the DCAA issued its official
audit report ("Audit Report") in which it concluded that the cost or pricing
data supplied by the Company to the U.S. Navy was not current, accurate, and
complete and, therefore, that projected labor and overhead costs were overstated
for the REAGAN contract. Accordingly, the DCAA recommended to the U.S. Navy's
contracting officer that the contract price for REAGAN be reduced.

The Company disagrees with the conclusions of the Audit Report and the DCAA's
recommendation to the contracting officer. Management believes that the Company
has substantial and meritorious grounds on which to contest any action by the
U.S. Navy seeking to reduce the REAGAN contract price and intends to pursue its
defenses to any attempt by the U.S. Navy to make such a reduction.

In addition to the DCAA audit, a civil investigation, also focused on the cost
or pricing data that the Company supplied to the U.S. Navy in connection with
the REAGAN contract, is being conducted jointly by the Department of Defense,
the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District
of Virginia, and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service. Management believes
the Company complied with all applicable laws.

During the first quarter of 1999, the Company received a letter from the U.S.
Navy Supervisor of Shipbuilding forwarding a DCAA final audit report questioning
costs allocated and billed to U.S. Government contracts as Independent Research
and Development ("IR&D"). A draft DCAA audit report issued in 1998 had
questioned the appropriateness of accounting for those costs as IR&D and alleged
such treatment was not in compliance with two Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS").
The letter requested additional comments regarding why NNS considers the
existing cost accounting practice to be CAS compliant. The Company anticipates
providing such comments in the second quarter of 1999.

Although the ultimate outcome of these issues cannot be predicted, should a
successful claim be made in any such matter, it could entail an amount material
to the Company's financial position and results of operations; however, based on
the Company's present understanding of the claims the U.S. Government might
assert, and defenses believed to be available in connection with the REAGAN
contract matter, management believes that the final resolution of these matters
will not have a material impact on the financial position or results of
operations of the Company. Management continues to assess the IR&D matter and
believes, based on current information, that it would be premature to express
any opinion as to whether or not the eventual outcome may have a material impact
on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

During 1997, the Company submitted a request for a Shipbuilding Capability
Preservation Agreement pursuant to Section 1027 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for the Fiscal Year 1998. This section enables the Company to
recover from the U.S. Government a portion of certain indirect costs which would
have been allocated to government contracts had commercial projects not been
undertaken. During the second quarter of 1998, an agreement was reached with the
U.S. Navy whereby the Company may recover $10 to $15 million of such costs by
year-end 2000.

SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES

From 1994 to 1996, the Company entered into fixed price contracts to construct a
total of nine DOUBLE EAGLE product tankers. The first of the nine ships was
delivered at the end of September 1997. In March 1998, the Company announced a
revised strategy for this program that will result in only five of the remaining
eight undelivered ships being built, after which the Company will withdraw from
the market. As of December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1997, the cumulative
provision for losses recorded on undelivered ships was approximately $80 million
and $325 million, respectively. The Company recorded charges against earnings of
approximately $207 million and $70 million in 1997 and 1996, respectively.

<PAGE>

The first three of the five remaining ships were delivered during the fourth
quarter of 1998. The Company delivered a fourth ship in February 1999. The final
ship should be delivered by the middle of 1999. Estimates of cancellation
charges and material disposition costs on the three canceled ships were revised
downward by approximately $10 million during 1998. The Company intends to
continue to review this program at the end of each quarter. There can be no
assurance that the estimate of costs to be incurred on these contracts will not
be revised at that time based on the facts then known to the Company.


LITIGATION

The Company is a defendant in matters of varying nature related to the normal
conduct of its business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of these
proceedings should not have a material adverse effect on the financial position
or results of operations of the Company.

CAPITAL COMMITMENTS

The Company estimates that expenditures aggregating approximately $18 million
will be required after December 31, 1998, to complete facilities and projects
authorized at such date, and substantial commitments have been made in
connection therewith.

LEASE COMMITMENTS

The Company holds certain equipment under long-term operating leases. Future
minimum lease payments under existing noncancelable operating leases as of
December 31, 1998, are as follows:

                               YEAR                 PAYMENT
                               ----                 -------

                               1999              $  12 million
                               2000                 11 million
                               2001                  9 million
                               2002                  5 million
                               2003                  2 million
                            Thereafter               4 million
                                                 -------------
                                                 $  43 million
                                                 =============

Rent expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996,
was $19 million, $11 million, and $5 million, respectively.

OTHER COMMITMENTS

The Company's commitments under service agreements for hardware, software, and
related services as of December 31, 1998 are as follows:

                               YEAR                 PAYMENT
                               ----                 -------

                               1999              $  23 million
                               2000                 23 million
                               2001                 22 million
                               2002                 22 million
                               2003                  7 million
                            Thereafter               3 million
                                                 -------------
                                                 $ 100 million
                                                 =============

<PAGE>


14. TRANSACTIONS WITH FORMER PARENT COMPANY

CORPORATE DEBT AND INTEREST ALLOCATION

The historical practice of the Company's former parent was generally to incur
indebtedness for its consolidated group at the parent company level. For
financial reporting purposes, corporate debt of the former parent and its
related interest expense was allocated to the Company generally based upon the
ratio of the Company's net assets to the former parent's consolidated net assets
plus debt. Interest expense was allocated at a rate equivalent to the
weighted-average cost of all corporate debt, which was 9.2% for 1996. Total
pre-tax interest expense allocated to the Company in 1996 was $31 million.

The Company had also been allocated tax benefits approximating 35% of the
allocated pre-tax interest expense. Although interest expense, and the related
tax effects, have been allocated to the Company for financial reporting on a
historical basis, the Company was not billed for these amounts. The changes in
allocated corporate debt and the after-tax allocated interest have been included
as a component of the Company's Combined Equity.

NOTES AND ADVANCES RECEIVABLE FROM FORMER PARENT

Cash Transfers from Former Parent in the Statements of Changes in Stockholders'
Equity consist of net cash changes in notes and advances receivable with the
former parent. Historically, the former parent utilized notes and advances to
centrally manage cash funding requirements for its consolidated group.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Certain employees of the Company participated in the employee stock ownership
and employee stock purchase plans offered by its former parent prior to the
spinoff. The employee stock ownership plan provided for grants of a variety of
awards, including stock options and restricted stock to officers and key
employees of the Company. The employee stock purchase plan allowed employees to
purchase common stock of its former parent at a 15% discount subject to certain
thresholds. In connection with the spinoff, all options held by employees of the
Company were canceled as of December 11, 1996 and were replaced in January 1997
with approximately 2.1 million options granted under the Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. Stock Ownership Plan (See Note 11).

Had compensation expense for stock-based compensation been determined in
accordance with FAS No. 123, based on fair value at the grant dates for awards
under applicable plans, the Company's pro forma net earnings for the year ended
December 31, 1996 would have been lower by approximately $3 million ($.09 per
share).

The fair value of each option granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model based on the following assumptions for grants in 1996: (i)
risk free rate of 5.4%; (ii) expected lives of 5.0 years; (iii) expected
volatility of 26.6%; and (iv) a dividend yield of 3.7%. The estimated
weighted-average fair value per option granted to the Company's employees during
1996 was $10.75. See Note 11 for a discussion of the Company's Stock
Compensation Plans.

Certain employees of the Company also participated in a pension plan provided by
its former parent. Reference is made to Note 10 for a further discussion of the
Company's pension plan.

ANCILLARY AGREEMENTS

In order to assist in the orderly transition of the Company to a separate,
publicly held company, the former parent modified, amended or entered into
certain contractual agreements with the Company in 1996. Such agreements include
the tax sharing agreement discussed in Note 9, an employee benefits agreement,
an insurance agreement, an administrative services agreement, and other
ancillary agreements.

<PAGE>

15. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS

The Company adopted FAS No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and Related Information", during 1998. FAS No. 131 established standards for
reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements
and requires selected information about operating segments in interim financial
reports issued to stockholders. It also established standards for related
disclosures about products and services, and geographic areas. Operating
segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate
financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief
operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate
resources and in assessing performance. The operating segments are managed
separately because each operating segment represents a strategic business unit
that offers different products and services.

The Company's reportable operating segments include three areas involving U.S.
Naval and commercial ships: (i) Construction; (ii) Fleet Services; and (iii)
Engineering. Revenues from contracts with the U.S. Navy represent approximately
92%, 94%, and 94% of the Company's consolidated revenues for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, respectively. Essentially all reportable
segments operate out of the Company's facilities located in Newport News,
Virginia.

The Company's reportable operating segments represent strategic initiatives
supporting the entire lifecycle of U.S. Navy ships - Construction, Fleet
Services, and Engineering, as well as a logical linking of similar contracts
based on funding provisions. Engineering contracts generally receive funding on
an annual basis, Fleet Services contracts typically span between one month to
two years, and Construction contracts generally span a period of two or more
years. The reportable segments are managed separately because each business has
differing customer requirements based on the nature of the services provided.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance
based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and interest, not
including nonrecurring gains and losses. A brief description of each reportable
operating segment follows:

CONSTRUCTION

The Company's primary activity is constructing ships. Currently, the Company's
major construction efforts include the aircraft carrier RONALD REAGAN, start-up
of the new attack submarine construction program (the VIRGINIA class), and
completion of the one remaining commercial product tanker (See Note 13).

FLEET SERVICES

The Company provides ongoing maintenance for the U.S. Navy's vessels through
overhauling, refueling, and repair work. The Company possesses unique expertise
in servicing nuclear naval systems, and believes it currently is the only
non-government-owned shipyard capable of refueling nuclear-powered aircraft
carriers. Additionally, the Company provides repair services for commercial
vessels.

ENGINEERING

The Company provides engineering planning and design services primarily for U.S.
Government customers. The Company maintains a stable level of funded engineering
support contracts for the U.S. Navy. Support services provided by the Company
include: new aircraft carrier research and development, aircraft carrier
non-nuclear overhaul planning, reactor plant engineering, aircraft carrier
engineering support, and training and logistics. The Company is a leader in
aircraft carrier design, accounting for the majority of ship integration and
related design development for the Naval Sea Systems Command ("NAVSEA").

<PAGE>

INFORMATION ABOUT OPERATING EARNINGS AND ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                FLEET                            ALL
                                               CONSTRUCTION    SERVICES        ENGINEERING      OTHERS(1)   TOTAL
                                               ------------    ---------       -----------     ----------   -----
<S>                                               <C>            <C>                 <C>            <C>       <C>
1998
----
Revenues....................................     $     833      $     720       $    282       $     27    $  1,862
Segment Operating Earnings..................            92             69             21             (7)        175
Segment Assets at December 31, 1998(2)......           119            107             27            224         477

1997
----
Revenues....................................     $     935      $     500       $    248       $     24    $  1,707
Segment Operating Earnings..................           (83)            50             19             (5)        (19)
Segment Assets at December 31, 1997(2)......            86             90             36            183         395

1996
----
Revenues....................................     $   1,029      $     625       $    194       $     22    $  1,870
Segment Operating Earnings..................            44             88             13             (5)        140
Segment Assets at December 31, 1996(2)......           156            137             40            127         460

</TABLE>


1.   Other business activities include industrial products, commercial nuclear
     activities including valve and pump repair and technical services, equity
     investments, and corporate activities.

2.   As the Company has a fully integrated production facility, its fixed assets
     are commingled and not identified with specific profit centers. Therefore,
     segment assets consist only of accounts receivable ("A/R") and contracts in
     process ("CIP") balances applicable to identified segments.



A reconciliation of the totals reported for the operating segments to the
applicable line items in the consolidated financial statements is as follows:

RECONCILIATION OF SEGMENT INFORMATION TO CONSOLIDATED AMOUNTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                1998         1997         1996
                                                                             ---------    ---------     --------
<S>                                                                             <C>            <C>       <C>

Revenues
--------
Total revenues for reportable segments...................................    $   1,835    $   1,683     $  1,848
Other revenues...........................................................           27           24           22
                                                                             ---------    ---------     --------
         Total consolidated revenues.....................................    $   1,862    $   1,707     $  1,870
                                                                             =========    =========     ========

Operating Earnings
------------------
Total operating earnings for reportable segments.........................    $     182    $     (14)    $    145
Other operating earnings.................................................           (7)          (5)          (5)
                                                                             ---------    ---------     --------
         Total consolidated operating earnings...........................    $     175    $     (19)    $    140
                                                                             =========    =========     ========

Assets
------
Total A/R and CIP for reportable segments................................    $     253    $     212     $    333
Other unallocated A/R and CIP............................................          224          183          127
Other unallocated amounts................................................        1,123        1,120        1,075
                                                                             ---------    ---------     --------
         Total consolidated assets.......................................    $   1,600    $   1,515     $  1,535
                                                                             =========    =========     ========
</TABLE>


<PAGE>

16. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Earnings/                     Net Earnings/
                                                      Operating    (Loss) Before         Net        (Loss) Per Share
                                                                                                    ----------------
MILLIONS (EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)        Revenues    Earnings (Loss)  Income Taxes   Earnings (Loss)   Basic  Diluted
                                       --------    ---------------  ------------   ---------------   -----  -------
<S>                                     <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>       <C>
1998
1st Quarter..........................    $   397     $    40           $   27         $    16       $  .46   $  .44
2nd Quarter..........................        466          42               28              16          .46      .45
3rd Quarter..........................        462          43               29              17          .47      .46
4th Quarter..........................        537          50               30              17          .52      .50


1997
1st Quarter..........................    $   403     $    35           $   22         $    13       $  .38   $  .38
2nd Quarter..........................        450          37               24              14          .39      .38
3rd Quarter..........................        423          16                2               1          .05      .04
4th Quarter..........................        431        (107)            (122)            (76)       (2.21)   (2.21)

</TABLE>


17.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC. AND AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC. PROPOSED MERGER

In January 1999, the Boards of Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. and
Avondale Industries, Inc. approved and each company executed a definitive
agreement to combine the two companies. The combined company would be named
Newport News Avondale Industries Inc. The transaction is subject to approval by
the shareholders of both companies, U.S. regulatory reviews, and other customary
closing conditions, and is scheduled for completion in the second quarter of
1999. In February 1999, the Department of Justice under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 cleared the proposed merger, satisfying one
important condition to the closing of the transaction. It is anticipated that
the transaction would be accounted for as a pooling-of-interests.

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION OFFER TO NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING, INC.

In February 1999, the Company received an offer from General Dynamics
Corporation ("General Dynamics") proposing to pay $38.50 per share in cash for
all of its outstanding shares, subject to various conditions including antitrust
clearance from the appropriate regulatory authorities in the Departments of
Justice and Defense. Under the terms of the proposed merger with Avondale
Industries, the Company is not permitted to enter into a transaction with a
party that has made a proposal to acquire Newport News unless, among other
things, the Newport News Board of Directors has determined that the General
Dynamics offer could result in a proposal superior to the proposed merger with
Avondale.

In order for a proposal to be a superior proposal, the Board of Directors must
determine that the transaction is both reasonably capable of being completed,
taking into account legal, regulatory and other factors, and its financial and
other terms are more favorable to Newport News and its shareholders. Given the
potential regulatory issues concerning the proposed General Dynamics - Newport
News combination, the Board of Directors could not determine that the General
Dynamics proposal could result in a superior proposal to the Avondale
transaction. At such time that the Department of Defense indicates that there is
a reasonable likelihood that antitrust issues would not impede negotiations, the
Board of Directors would then be prepared to evaluate the terms of the General
Dynamics proposal, including the proposed price.

FORMATION OF BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL
CORP ("SAIC")

In March 1999, the Company announced the formation of a worldwide business
partnership with Science Applications International Corp. ("SAIC"). The
partnership will involve a new limited liability company ("LLC") comprised of
SAIC's subsidiary, AMSEC, and the Company's life cycle engineering department.
The new organization will be named AMSEC LLC and will create a low cost fleet
services organization capable of providing logistics and life cycle services for
aircraft carriers, submarines, surface combatants, and amphibious and auxiliary
ships from 20 locations, including every major U.S. Navy port. The new
organization will employ approximately 1,500 current employees of AMSEC and the
Company. The Company will own 45% and SAIC 55% of the new organization.

<PAGE>

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

                                    PART III

ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The following table sets forth a list of the executive officers of Newport News
Shipbuilding Inc. at March 1, 1999. Each such officer has served in the
capacities indicated below with Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (or, for periods
prior to the spinoff, with the Company's former parent) since the dates
indicated below. Unless otherwise indicated all offices held are with the
Company.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                 EFFECTIVE
NAME (AGE AT DECEMBER 31, 1998)         OFFICES HELD                                             DATE OF TERM
-------------------------------         ------------                                             ------------
<S>                                   <C>                                                           <C>
William P. Fricks(54)..........    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                           May 1998
                                   Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer               January 1997
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer                          November 1995
                                   President and Chief Operating Officer                          September 1994
Thomas C. Schievelbein(45).....    Executive Vice President - Operations                          October 1995
                                   Vice President - Human Resources and Administration            January 1995
                                   Vice President - Strategy and Naval Program Development        January 1994
                                   Vice President - Naval Marketing                               March 1993
                                   Director - Naval Marketing                                     March 1992
                                   Director - Marketing Field Office                              January 1990
David J. Anderson(49)..........    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer              July 1996
Stephen B. Clarkson(61)........    Vice President - General Counsel and Secretary                 January 1991
William G. Cridlin, Jr.(52)....    Vice President and General Manager - Submarines                July 1998
                                   Vice President - Marketing                                     January 1995
                                   Vice President - Commercial Shipbuilding                       April 1992
Roger Eshelman(59).............    Vice President - Nuclear Engineering                           July 1998
                                   Director and Chief Nuclear Engineer                            January 1995
                                   Vice President - Naval Engineering                             March 1993
                                   Chief Engineer - Naval Engineering                             April 1992
Robert L. Gunter, Jr.(42)......    Vice President - Engineering                                   July 1998
                                   Vice President - Surface Ships                                 December 1997
                                   Director - Surface Ships                                       January 1997
                                   Program Director - Ship Repair & FF21 Program                  June 1995
                                   Program Director - FF21 Program                                December 1994
                                   Program Manager - Submarines                                   January 1994
                                   Engineering Manager - Attack Submarine Program                 April 1993
T. Michael Hatfield(52)........    Vice President - Corporate Communications                      October 1995
                                   Director - Public Relations                                    November 1993
Alfred Little, Jr.(52).........    Vice President - Human Resources and EH&S                      July 1996
Marc Y. E. Pelaez(52)..........    Vice President - Business & Technology Development             July 1998
                                   Vice President - Engineering                                   August 1996
C. Michael Petters(39).........    Vice President and General Manager - Aircraft Carriers         July 1998
                                   Vice President - Aircraft Carriers                             December 1997
                                   Director - Carrier Program                                     January 1995
                                   Manager - Strategy and Naval Program                           January 1994
John E. Shephard, Jr.(43)......    Vice President - Manufacturing and Materials                   July 1998
                                   Vice President - Manufacturing and Process Innovation          March 1997
                                   Vice President - Strategy and Process Innovation               October 1995
Patrick A. Tucker(51)..........    Vice President - Government Relations                          December 1996

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


<S>                                  <C>                                                              <C>
George A. Wade(54).............    Vice President - Assembly, Test, and Trades                    July 1998
                                   Vice President - Submarines and Non-Nuclear Test               October 1995
                                   Vice President - Construction                                  January 1995
                                   Vice President - Submarines                                    March 1993
                                   Director - Submarine Construction                              April 1992
William B. Weaver, Jr.(53).....    Vice President - Planning and Facilities                       July 1998
                                   Director - Production/Resource Planning                        September 1996
                                   Director - Human Resources                                     January 1994
Charles P. Wingfield, Jr.(45)..    Vice President and Controller                                  July 1998
                                   Director - Operations Finance                                  May 1998
                                   Director - Corporate Finance                                   September 1996
                                   Controller & Treasurer                                         January 1995
                                   Controller                                                     March 1993
D. R. Wyatt(40)................    Treasurer                                                      September 1996
                                   Assistant Treasurer                                            August 1995
                                   Manager - Finance                                              April 1989


</TABLE>


Each of the executive officers of the Company has been continuously engaged in
the business of the Company, its affiliates or predecessor companies during the
past five years except for:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


NAME                               PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT AND OFFICE HELD                           PERIOD
----                               -----------------------------------                           -------
<S>                                          <C>                                                    <C>
David J. Anderson                  RJ Reynolds Corporation
                                   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer          1991 to 1996

Alfred Little, Jr.                 Sun Company, Inc.
                                   Vice President - Human Resources                              1992 to 1996
                                   Director - Human Resources                                    1988 to 1992

Marc Y. E. Pelaez                  Rear Admiral United States Navy
                                   Chief of Navy Research                                        1993 to 1996

                                   Executive Assistant Secretary to the
                                   Assistant Secretary of the Navy (RDA)                         1990 to 1993

Patrick A. Tucker                  Tenneco
                                   Executive Director - Government Relations                     1996
                                   Director - Federal Relations                                  1994 to 1996

                                   Counsel to Senator John Warner                                1993 to 1994

                                   Minority Staff Director and Counsel to the
                                   U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee                          1983 to 1993

</TABLE>

<PAGE>



ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Prior to the  Spin-off,  the  business of the Company and its  subsidiaries  was
owned and operated by Tenneco Inc. through its direct and indirect  subsidiaries
and, as such,  the  management of the Company was employed by Tenneco and/or its
direct and indirect subsidiaries.  The following Summary Compensation Table sets
forth  the  remuneration   paid  by  Tenneco  and/or  its  direct  and  indirect
subsidiaries prior to the Spin-off on December 11, 1996 and by the Company after
that date (i) to the  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company and
(ii) to each of the four other most highly compensated executive officers of the
Company during the three fiscal years ended December 31, 1998.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Restricted   Securities  Long-Term         All
Name and Principal                                   Stock      Underlying  Incentive        Other
     Position        Year  Salary($)(a)  Bonus($)(a) Awards($)  Options/SAR  Payouts($)  Compensation
                                                                    (#)                     ($)(b)
-------------------  ----- --------     ----------- ---------- ----------   -------     ------------
<S>                  <C>   <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>         <C>
William P. Fricks    1998  $540,000     $685,000           -      68,515         -      $109,850
Chairman and         1997  $525,000     $   -              -     272,187(d)      -      $ 68,836
Chief Executive      1996  $395,500     $230,000           -      30,000         -      $ 45,378
Officer


Thomas C.            1998  $365,000     $358,000           -      35,870         -      $ 84,860
Schievelbein         1997  $345,000     $ 83,000           -     125,934(d)      -      $ 43,169
Executive Vice       1996  $238,900     $109,000    $168,875(e)   14,000         -      $ 26,513
President

David J. Anderson    1998  $300,000     $300,000    $ 53,250(c)   25,390         -      $ 39,586
Senior Vice          1997  $270,000     $ 74,000           -      37,300         -      $ 34,652
President and        1996  $116,272(f)  $ 68,000           -           -         -      $    297
Chief Financial
Officer



Stephen B.           1998  $231,500     $156,000           -      16,685         -      $ 37,063
Clarkson             1997  $222,000     $ 56,000           -      60,514(d)      -      $ 30,491
Vice President,      1996  $206,565     $ 68,000    $ 86,850(e)    4,300         -      $ 13,595
General Counsel
and Secretary


Alfred Little, Jr.   1998  $231,500     $165,000           -      16,685         -      $ 42,452
Vice President,      1997  $218,000     $ 55,000           -      26,400         -      $ 22,693
Human Resources      1996  $ 93,912(f)  $149,000(g)        -           -         -      $    382
and EH&S
</TABLE>

     (a)  Includes  amounts  contributed  to the  Company's  401(k) and deferred
     compensation plans in the case of salary,  and deferred  compensation plans
     in the case of bonus.

     (b) Includes amounts  attributable during 1998 to Company  contributions to
     benefit  plans and  dividend  equivalents  paid or accrued  on  performance
     shares as follows:

        (1) Amounts  contributed  to 401(k) and deferred  compensation  plans on
        behalf of Messrs. Fricks,  Schievelbein,  Anderson, Clarkson, and Little
        were $74,967, $65,701, $24,856, $19,907, and $34,247, respectively.

        (2) Amounts  imputed as income for federal income tax purposes under the
        Company's  group life  insurance plan for Messrs.  Fricks,  Shievelbein,
        Anderson, Clarkson, and Little were $8,379, $44,117, $5,046, $10,657 and
        $1,706, respectively.

        (3) Dividend  equivalents paid or accrued on performance  shares held by
        Messrs.  Fricks,  Schievelbein,   Anderson,  Clarkson  and  Little  were
        $26,504, $15,042, $9,684, $6,499, and $6,499, respectively.

     (c)  Mr.  Anderson  was  granted  2,000  restricted   shares  during  1998.
     Restrictions  lapse after three years of continued  employment from date of
     grant. As of December 31, 1998, Mr. Anderson held 2,000  restricted  shares
     with a value of $66,875.

     (d) Includes options  exchanged for previously held Tenneco options granted
     prior to the Spin-off.

     (e) Includes the dollar value of grants of  restricted  stock made pursuant
     to Tenneco restricted stock plans based on the price of the common stock of
     Tenneco on the date of grant. All grants of Tenneco restricted stock vested
     on November 1, 1996.

     (f) Messrs.  Anderson  and Little  joined the  company in 1996.  The amount
     reported reflects less than a full year's compensation.

<PAGE>

     (g) Includes a one-time  payment of $65,000 in connection with Mr. Little's
     acceptance of employment with the Company.

OPTION GRANTS IN 1998

The following  table sets forth the number of stock  options to acquire  Newport
News  Shipbuilding  Common  Stock  that were  granted  in 1998 to the  following
persons named in the Summary Compensation Table. The Company has not granted any
SAR's.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Potential Realizable Value
                                           INDIVIDUAL GRANTS(a)                         at Assumed Annual Rates
                       ------------------------------------------------------------         of Stock Price
                        Number of   % Of Total                                          Appreciation for Option
                       Securities     Options                                                    Term
                       Underlying    Granted to       Exercise or                      --------------------------
                        Options     Employees in      Base Price
       NAME             Granted(#) Fiscal Year(b)    Per Share      Expiration Date        5%            10%
<S>                    <C>          <C>               <C>            <C>               <C>           <C>
William P. Fricks        68,515        10.99%          $24.812            1/1/08       $1,069,118    $2,709,352
Thomas C. Schievelbein   35,870         5.75%          $24.812            1/1/08         $559,721    $1,418,441
David J. Anderson        25,390         4.07%          $24.812            1/1/08         $396,189    $1,004,020
Stephen B. Clarkson      16,685         2.68%          $24.812            1/1/08         $260,355      $659,790
Alfred Little, Jr.       16,685         2.68%          $24.812            1/1/08         $260,355      $659,790
</TABLE>

     (a) All options  vest  ratably  over three years  beginning  with the first
         anniversary of the original grant date.

     (b) Based on 623,663 options granted to all employees in 1998.

AGGREGATE OPTION EXERCISES IN 1998 AND 1998 YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

The following table provides  information as to options exercised by each of the
named  executive  officers  of the  Company  during  1998,  and  the  number  of
securities  underlying   unexercised  options  and  the  value  of  unexercised,
in-the-money  options at fiscal year-end.  No options were exercised during 1998
by the individuals named in the Summary  Compensation Table. The Company has not
granted any SAR's.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Number of Securities
                                                        Underlying Unexercised       Value of Unexercised In--
                                                          Options at Fiscal             The-Money Options at
                           Shares                           Year-End(#)               Fiscal Year-End($)(a)
                        Acquired on       Value      --------------------------    -----------------------------
       NAME             Exercise(#)   Realized($)    Exercisable  Unexercisable    Exercisable     Unexercisable
       ----             ------------  ------------   -----------  -------------    -----------     -------------
<S>                     <C>           <C>            <C>          <C>              <C>             <C>
William P. Fricks           --            --           165,800       174,902       $3,137,412        $2,566,794
Thomas C. Schievelbein      --            --            71,345        90,459       $1,338,461        $1,322,559
David J. Anderson           --            --            12,433        50,257         $229,233          $677,486
Stephen B. Clarkson         --            --            38,167        39,032         $715,446          $557,990
Alfred Little, Jr.          --            --             8,800        34,285         $162,250          $468,416
</TABLE>

     (a) The values shown equal the  difference  between the  exercise  price of
     unexercised  in-the-money  options  and the  average  of the  high  and low
     trading  prices of Newport News  Shipbuilding  Common Stock on December 31,
     1998. Options are in the money if the fair market value of the Common Stock
     exceeds the exercise price of the option.

<PAGE>

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN PERFORMANCE SHARE AWARDS IN 1998

The following  table shows the value of  performance  shares granted during 1998
under the Newport News  Shipbuilding  Stock  Ownership  Plan that are earned pro
rata,  based on the  achievement  of specified  share price targets over a three
year performance period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                           Number of           Performance or
                        Shares, Units or     Other Period Until
                         Other Rights          Maturation or       Threshold Target($)    Maximum Target($)
        Name                  (#)                  Payout             $30 Per Share       $40 Per Share(a)
        ----            ----------------     -----------------     --------------------   -----------------
<S>                     <C>                  <C>                   <C>                    <C>
William P. Fricks           51,385               3 years               $1,541,550            $2,055,400
Thomas C. Schievelbein      25,110               3 years                 $753,300            $1,004,400
David J. Anderson           17,775               3 years                 $533,250              $711,000
Stephen B. Clarkson         10,845               3 years                 $325,350              $433,800
Alfred Little, Jr.          10,845               3 years                 $325,350              $433,800
</TABLE>

     (a) Earned  shares  will be paid in stock,  cash or a  combination,  at the
     Compensation Committee's discretion.  No shares earned will vest before the
     expiration  of three  years  from the  grant  date  (1/2/98).  During  this
     three-year period,  the awards are subject to forfeiture,  should the named
     executive  officer  cease  to be  employed  by the  Company,  or one of its
     subsidiaries,  other than as a result of death,  disability or  retirement.
     The  three-year  performance  period  during which the awards may be earned
     ends on  1/1/2000  whether or not stock  price  objectives  were  achieved.
     Dividend  equivalent  payments  made on  unvested  awards  during  1998 are
     included in the named  executive  officers'  other  compensation  for 1998.
     Awards do not entail voting rights.

The following table shows the threshold,  target and maximum number of shares of
Newport  News  Shipbuilding  Common  Stock,  which  can  be  earned,   based  on
performance shares granted during 1998. The number of shares earned depends upon
the achievement of earnings per share objectives.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Performance or
                          Number of       Other Period
                       Shares, Units or      Until                 Estimated Future Payouts
                        Other Rights      Maturation or   -------------------------------------
Name                        (#)             Payout(a)    Threshold(#)  Target(#)   Maximum(#)
----                   ----------------   -------------  ------------- ----------  -----------
<S>                    <C>               <C>             <C>           <C>         <C>
William P. Fricks         20,150            3 Years         6,045        20,150      40,300
Thomas C. Schievelbein    10,550            3 Years         3,165        10,550      21,100
David J. Anderson          7,470            3 Years         2,241         7,470      14,940
Stephen B. Clarkson        4,910            3 Years         1,473         4,910       9,820
Alfred Little, Jr.         4,910            3 Years         1,473         4,910       9,820
</TABLE>

     (a) 1/2/98 through 12/31/2000.

  The following table shows the value of performance-accelerated restricted
shares granted during 1998 under the Newport News Stock Ownership Plan. The
performance-accelerated restricted shares vest if an established stock price
target is attained prior to the expiration of a specified performance period and
if the holder of these restricted shares has continued employment for at least
two years from the date of grant. If this threshold target is not attained
during the performance period, the holder will vest after three years of
continued empoyment from the date of grant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                   Number of Shares,  Performance or Other
                   Units or Other     Period Until              Threshold Target ($)
Name               Rights (#)         Maturation Or Payout (a)  $26 per Share (b)
----               ----------------   ------------------------  -----------------
<S>                <C>                <C>                       <C>
William P. Fricks  20,600             3 Years                   $535,600

</TABLE>

(a) January 28, 1998 through March 13, 2001

(b) The stock price objective is attained if the average closing price of
Newport News common stock is equal to or exceeds $26.00 per share
for any ten consecutvie trading days during the period January 28, 1998
through March 13, 2001.


<PAGE>

PENSION PLAN TABLE

The following table sets forth the aggregate  estimated  annual benefits payable
upon  normal  retirement   pursuant  to  the  Company's   Retirement  Plan  (the
"Retirement  Plan"),  and  certain  non-qualified  structures.  The  Company has
adopted  non-qualified  structures to provide  employees  with the benefits that
would be provided under the Retirement Plan but for applicable legal limits. The
numbers set forth in the following table assume payments under those structures.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                 Years of Credited Participation
            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remuneration    5          10         15        20         25         30         35
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>          <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>
$  200,000   $15,700   $ 31,400   $ 47,100   $ 62,900  $ 78,600   $ 94,300    $110,000

   300,000    23,600     47,100     70,700     94,300   117,900    141,400     165,000

   400,000    31,400     62,900     94,300    125,700   157,100    188,600     220,000

   500,000    39,300     78,600    117,900    157,100   196,400    235,700     275,000

   600,000    47,100     94,300    141,400    188,600   235,700    282,900     330,000

   700,000    55,000    110,000    165,000    220,000   275,000    330,000     385,000

   800,000    62,900    125,700    188,600    251,400   314,300    377,100     440,000

   900,000    70,700    141,400    212,100    282,900   353,600    424,300     495,000

 1,000,000    78,600    157,100    235,700    314,300   392,900    471,400     550,000

 1,100,000    86,400    172,900    259,300    345,700   432,100    518,600     605,000

 1,200,000    94,300    188,600    282,900    377,100   471,400    565,700     660,000

 1,300,000   102,100    204,300    306,400    408,600   510,700    612,900     715,000

 1,400,000   110,000    220,000    330,000    440,000   550,000    660,000     770,000

 1,500,000   117,900    235,700    353,600    471,400   589,300    707,100     825,000
</TABLE>

The  benefits  set forth above are  computed as a straight  life annuity and are
based  on  years  of  credited  participation  in the  Retirement  Plan  and the
employee's  average  base  salary  during  the  final  five  years  of  credited
participation  in the Plan;  such benefits are subject to an offset for benefits
accrued under the Company's former parent's  retirement plan but are not subject
to  any  deduction  for  Social  Security.   The  estimated  credited  years  of
participation for Messrs. Fricks,  Schievelbein,  Anderson, Clarkson, and Little
are 36, 10, 9, 7 and 11, respectively.

Messrs.  Fricks,  Schievelbein  and Anderson  have  employment  agreements  that
provide  retirement  benefits  based on the  average  of their  base  salary and
bonuses during the term of the agreement.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

All  directors  who are not also  employees of the Company are paid a director's
fee of $28,000 per annum, $12,500 in cash and the remainder in restricted shares
of Company  Common Stock,  and an attendance fee of $1,250,  plus expenses,  for
each meeting of the Board of Directors  and an  attendance  fee of $1,000,  plus
expenses,  for each  committee  meeting  attended.  Each  director who serves as
chairman of a  committee  of the Board is paid an  additional  fee of $3,000 per
annum per chairmanship.

Directors  who are not also  employees  of the Company  each  receive an initial
grant of 2,000 stock  options and an additional  2,000 stock  options  annually.
Directors  who are not also  employees  of the Company  each  receive a one-time
grant of 1,000 shares of restricted stock upon joining the Board.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

The  Company  has an  employment  agreement  with Mr.  Fricks for a term  ending
December 12, 1999.  Effective  January 1, 1999,  Mr. Fricks will receive  annual
compensation of not less than $560,000, subject to such adjustments as may, from
time to  time,  be  approved  by the  Compensation  Committee  of the  Board  of
Directors,  and annual  financial  planning  services and  retirement  and other
benefits.  The agreement  provides that,  upon Mr. Fricks'  separation  from the
Company,  he will receive career  transition  assistance of up to $75,000.  Upon
involuntary  termination,  or if the term of the agreement is not extended,  the
Company  will pay Mr.  Fricks a  severance  benefit in an amount  equal to three
times the sum of his then-current  base salary and the greater of (a) his target
bonus for the calendar year in which  termination  occurs or (b) his most recent
awarded bonus.

Subject  to  approval  of  the  Board  of  Directors,  Mr.  Fricks'  outstanding
restricted  stock,  stock option and  performance  share awards will vest and/or
become  exercisable in the event of his involuntary  termination or, if the term
of  the  agreement  is not  extended.  The  agreement  includes  a  supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) which provides for certain retirement benefits.

<PAGE>

The  Company  also has  employment  agreements  with  Messrs.  Schievelbein  and
Anderson for three-year  terms  commencing  June 1, 1998.  Effective  January 1,
1999, Messrs.  Schievelbein and Anderson will receive annual compensation of not
less than $381,000 and $330,000,  respectively,  subject to  adjustments as may,
from time to time,  be approved by the  Compensation  Committee  of the Board of
Directors,  and annual  financial  planning  services and  retirement  and other
benefits. The agreements provide that upon separation from the Company,  Messrs.
Schievelbein and Anderson will each receive career  transition  assistance of up
to $50,000.  Upon involuntary  termination,  or if the terms of their agreements
are not  extended,  the Company  will pay Messrs.  Schievelbein  and  Anderson a
severance  benefit in an amount  equal to two times the total cash  compensation
(base salary plus targeted bonus) in effect on the date of termination.

In addition,  subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors,  outstanding  restricted stock, stock option and performance share
awards  held by  Messrs.  Schievelbein  and  Anderson  will vest  and/or  become
exercisable in the event of their  involuntary  termination,  or if the terms of
their  agreements are not extended.  The agreements  also include a supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) which provides for certain retirement benefits.

The  Company  has  established  a  severance  plan for the  benefit  of  certain
employees   and  officers   whose   positions  are   terminated   under  certain
circumstances  following a change in control of the Company. Under the severance
plan, key executives of the rank of Senior Vice President and above,  as well as
certain other officers, would receive three times the sum of their annual salary
and the greater of their average bonus awards, together with any special awards,
over the last three years or their  targeted  bonus in effect at the time of the
change in  control,  if they are  terminated  within  three years of a change in
control.  Certain other key  employees  would receive two times the sum of their
annual salary and the greater of their  average bonus awards,  together with any
special  awards,  over the last three years or their targeted bonus in effect at
the time of the change in control,  if they are terminated within three years of
a change in control.

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC. BOARD COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE REPORT
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation and Benefits  Committee (the  "Compensation  Committee") of the
Board of Directors, which consists entirely of non-employee directors,  provides
the  following  report  on  executive   compensation.   Under  the  Compensation
Committee's supervision, the Company has developed and implemented the executive
compensation philosophy, policies, plans, and programs described below.

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY

The Company has  established a basic  philosophy for executive  compensation  to
reward  executives  primarily  based upon their ability to improve the financial
performance  of the Company and increase  shareholder  value.  The  Compensation
Committee believes this  pay-for-performance  philosophy will appropriately link
the interest of executives with those of stockholders.

Accordingly,  the Company's executive  compensation  program has been structured
to:

   o Align the total  compensation  paid to the  Company's  executives  with the
   Company's  business goals,  including (but not limited to) operating  income,
   cash flow,  earnings per share,  stock price  growth,  business  development,
   quality of earnings,  EEO, leadership  development,  and health,  safety, and
   environmental.

   o Reinforce a  pay-for-performance  culture  through  significant  short- and
   long-term  incentives.  Performance-based  pay  constitutes  the  significant
   majority of  compensation  opportunities  available  to all of the  Company's
   senior   executives.   For   performance   above  target,   executives   have
   significantly higher award opportunities. For performance below target, award
   opportunities  are  significantly  reduced and below certain levels, no award
   may be  earned.  Greater  emphasis  is  placed  on  incentives  which  reward
   executives for sustained long-term performance.

   o Strengthen the linkage  between  stockholders'  and  executives'  interests
   through   stock-based   incentives  and  stock  ownership   requirements.   A
   significant portion of each executive's on-going compensation will be derived
   from  stock-based  compensation,  including  stock  options  and  performance
   shares,  which require stock price growth and/or  achievement of earnings per
   share growth before any value is received by executives.  Additionally,  each
   executive is required to achieve and maintain certain stock ownership levels,
   which vary with executive level.  These  stock-based  incentives also contain
   vesting requirements, which aid in the retention of key executive talent.
<PAGE>

   o Attract and retain high quality  executive talent by providing  competitive
   total  compensation.   The  on-going   compensation  program  provides  total
   compensation  levels at market  medians  (50th  percentile)  when the Company
   achieves targeted performance objectives.  However, Company performance above
   established performance objectives can result in a total compensation package
   that  is  above  market  medians.   Conversely,   Company  performance  below
   established performance objectives can result in a total compensation package
   significantly below market medians.

   Under this structure,  the Company's executive  compensation program has been
   designed to provide  compensation  from three primary sources -- base salary,
   annual cash incentive awards,  and long-term,  stock-based  incentive awards,
   such as stock options and performance  shares. The following is a description
   of each of the components of the program.

BASE SALARY

The Compensation Committee reviews annually base salaries for senior executives.
The  Company's  annual salary plan is based on (i) the  executive's  performance
against  objectives,  (ii)  demonstration  of  leadership  competencies,   (iii)
judgments as to the executive's  past and expected future  contributions  to the
Company  and  (iv)  market  survey  data  for   comparable   positions.   Salary
recommendations  for senior  executives are developed under the direction of the
Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation Committee. However, the
base salary of the Chief Executive Officer is set by the Compensation  Committee
alone.

The information on competitive  market salaries is provided to the  Compensation
Committee  with  the  assistance  of  an  independent   executive   compensation
consultant.   Survey  data  is  derived  from  a  sample  of   similarly   sized
organizations  within the same or highly  related  industries  (the  "Comparator
Group"). The Comparator Group consists of organizations within the shipbuilding,
defense,  and heavy  manufacturing  industries.  The  companies  comprising  the
Comparator  Group  are not  necessarily  the same  companies  in the peer  group
indices in the performance graph included in this proxy statement.  Such indices
are intended to provide a relative  comparison of the Company's  total return to
shareholders  and are not  necessarily  indicative of the  Company's  market for
executive talent.

In  keeping  with  the  Company's  performance-based   compensation  philosophy,
including  more emphasis on variable than fixed pay,  salaries for the Company's
senior  executive  officers,  including  the named  executives,  are at or below
market medians (50th  percentile) for similar  positions at companies of similar
size in the Comparator Group.

ANNUAL INCENTIVES

Annual incentive plan opportunities  (targets) are also established using market
survey  data.  The  Company's   Annual  Incentive  Plan  provides  that  Company
executives  will  receive  cash  payments  from the Plan if they meet  specified
performance goals. These goals will typically consist of (but not be limited to)
one or more of the following  financial  measures:  operating income,  operating
cash flow, earnings per share, return on equity,  return on investment,  and net
income.  Larger  payouts may be earned if Plan goals are  exceeded.  Conversely,
smaller payouts (or no payout) may be earned if Plan goals are not met.

In addition, the level of awards indicated by achievement of financial goals can
be adjusted,  upward or downward,  based on the Company's performance related to
other  important  business  objectives   including  health  and  safety,   equal
employment  opportunity,   environmental,   leadership   development,   business
development and quality of earnings.

The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing  performance measures
and  performance   targets  at  the  beginning  of  each  year,  for  evaluating
performance  against these targets,  and for determining awards earned under the
Plan,  as well as  specific  award  levels  for  senior  executives.  Individual
incentive  awards  are  based  on  Company  performance  against  targets,  both
financial and non-financial, and evaluations of individual performance.

For 1998, the principal  financial measures were operating income (weighted 70%)
and operating cash flow (weighted 30%).  Actual  performance  exceeded  budgeted
performance  for 1998  resulting in awards to  executives,  including  all named
executives, at levels ranging from 25% to 55% above targeted levels.
<PAGE>

LONG-TERM INCENTIVES

The  Company's  long-term,  stock-based  incentive  plan is  designed to align a
significant  portion of the  executive's  total  compensation  with  stockholder
interests.  The Stock  Ownership  Plan, and its successor  Stock Incentive Plan,
provides the  flexibility to grant  long-term  incentives in a variety of forms,
including  stock  options,   performance   shares,   restricted   stock,   stock
appreciation rights, and other stock-based incentive vehicles. Periodically, the
Compensation  Committee establishes the types and levels of long-term incentives
it  believes  are most  likely  to  support  the  achievement  of the  Company's
performance and total compensation objectives. At increasing levels of executive
responsibility, it is the Compensation Committee's intent that executives derive
a larger percentage of total compensation from long-term,  stock-based incentive
vehicles.

For 1998,  long-term  incentives  were provided  through a combination  of stock
options and  performance  shares.  Incentive  opportunities  were  graduated  by
executive  level.  Earnings per share  ("EPS") was the  performance  measure for
determining actual performance share awards earned under the Plan. Payout levels
are based upon  performance  against EPS goals over a three year period.  Larger
payouts are earned if EPS goals are exceeded. Conversely, smaller payouts (or no
payout) may be earned if EPS goals are not met.  Based on the  Company's  actual
EPS for 1998,  performance  exceeded target for the 1997 grant and  approximated
target for the 1998 grant.

The number of options and performance shares granted to each executive was based
on a review of the grant levels and practices for a Comparator Group of publicly
traded  organizations of comparable size operating in similar industries.  Based
on the Company's pay philosophy,  the opportunities for the Company's  executive
officers are targeted somewhat above the median of the market.

In consideration  of its need to retain and provide  incentive to key executives
and to strengthen the link between executive and stockholder interests,  in 1998
the Company granted additional  performance shares to key executives,  including
the CEO.  The grant has a minimum  vesting  period of three  years.  Beyond that
minimum,  vesting is linked to stock price  performance,  and no vesting  occurs
unless stock price targets are achieved.

EXECUTIVE STOCK OWNERSHIP

The  Compensation  Committee  believes that  stockholder  interests are enhanced
through executive stock ownership.  Accordingly,  the Compensation Committee has
established  stock  ownership  requirements  for its key  executives.  The share
requirements  are defined as a multiple of each  executive's  base  salary.  The
multiple  varies  with level of  executive  responsibility  from four times base
salary at the highest  executive  level  ("CEO") to one times base salary at the
lowest  executive  level.  As of December 31, 1998,  all of the named  executive
officers  included  in the  Summary  Compensation  Table  have met and  exceeded
established requirements.

CEO COMPENSATION

The Compensation  Committee  established the  compensation  level for Mr. Fricks
using data for CEOs in the  Comparator  Group as a benchmark.  The  Compensation
Committee set Mr. Fricks' cash  compensation  opportunities  (salary plus annual
incentive)  below the market  median while  correspondingly  setting  long-term,
stock-based compensation  opportunities at a level above the market median. This
approach   corresponds  to  the  Company's  stated   philosophy  of  emphasizing
performance-based   pay  over  fixed  pay.  Total   compensation   opportunities
approximate the market median.  Annually, Mr. Fricks will be entitled to receive
compensation  under the Annual  Incentive Plan and stock-based  incentive grants
consistent with the provisions of the Stock Ownership Plan.

For 1998, the Committee  increased Mr.  Fricks' salary to $540,000,  which was a
2.9%  increase  from his $525,000  salary in 1997.  Mr.  Fricks' base salary was
increased by the Committee from $540,000 to $560,000 (3.7%),  effective  January
1, 1999.  These increases are  significantly  below the average for his peers in
the  "Comparator  Group" and, in percentage  terms,  are below the average merit
increases received by other salaried employees in 1998 and 1999.

In recognition of exceptional  Company  performance in 1998, Mr. Fricks received
an  annual  incentive  award of  $685,000.  In 1997,  because  of the  Company's
restated financial  performance and in connection with the Company's decision to
exit the  commercial  shipbuilding  business,  Mr. Fricks  elected to forego his
entire annual incentive award, even though an award would have been earned under
the provisions of the Plan.
<PAGE>

Mr. Fricks was also granted 20,600 shares of performance-accelerated  restricted
stock. The award was made to complete the Stock Incentive Grant approved in 1997
in connection  with the Company's  spin-off from Tenneco.  The vesting period of
the 1998  award  was  extended  by one year  beyond  the  vesting  period of the
original 1997 award to  strengthen  the  retention  potential of the grant.  The
award also provides for earlier  vesting if an additional  stock price target is
achieved, thereby strengthening the performance-based nature of the award.

$1 MILLION TAX LIMITATION

The Internal  Revenue Code of 1986, as amended,  provides that a  publicly-owned
corporation may not deduct compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid to
a corporation's  Chief Executive Officer or other named  executives,  subject to
certain  exceptions.  One exception is for  performance-based  compensation that
satisfies certain conditions of Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Company,  desiring both to compensate  its executives  competitively  and to
protect  its  tax  deduction  for  compensation,  has  elected  to  use  certain
stock-based incentives (i.e., stock options and performance shares) that qualify
as    "performance-based    compensation."    These   incentives    qualify   as
"performance-based  compensation"  because  their  value  to  the  executive  is
determined  by  either  increases  in the  Company's  stock  price  alone  or in
combination  with the achievement of objective  performance  goals.  The Company
does not expect any  compensation  to be  non-deductible  for Federal Income Tax
purposes.

The  Compensation  Committee  believes  the overall  design of the  compensation
program   appropriately   links   executive  and  stockholder   interests.   The
Compensation  Committee will regularly  evaluate the program to ensure continued
future alignment.

                                       COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE

                                                          Joseph J. Sisco --
                                                          Chairman
                                                          Dana G. Mead
                                                          Stephen R. Wilson
<PAGE>



PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following  graph presents a comparison of the cumulative  total  stockholder
return for  calendar  years ended  December 31, 1997 and 1998 as compared to the
Standard   &  Poors  400   Midcap   Stock   Index  and  the   Standard  &  Poors
Aerospace/Defense 500. The Company is a component of both indices. These figures
assume that all dividends paid over the performance period were reinvested,  and
that the starting  value of each index and the  investment in the Company Common
Stock was $100 on December  31,  1996.  The graph is not, and is not intended to
be,  indicative of future  performance of Company Common Stock.  Performance for
years prior to 1997 are not shown,  because until December 11, 1996, the Company
was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tenneco Inc.

COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN AMONG NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.,
                      S&P MIDCAP AND S&P AEROSPACE/DEFENSE

                                    [GRAPH]

Newport News Shipbuilding      $100      $171      $226
S&P Aerospace/Defense 500      $100      $103      $ 79
S&P 400 (Midcap)               $100      $132      $157

(1) Total return  equals stock price  appreciation  plus  reinvested  dividends.

<PAGE>

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Set forth  below is the  ownership,  as of April 1, 1999  (except  as  otherwise
stated),  of the  number  of shares  and  percentage  of  Company  Common  Stock
beneficially  owned  by (i)  each  director  of the  Company,  (ii)  each of the
executive  officers  of the  Company  whose  names are set forth on the  Summary
Compensation Table, (iii) all executive officers and directors of the Company as
a group and (iv) all persons beneficially owning more than 5% of the outstanding
Company Common Stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Shares of the       Aggregate     Options for
                               Company Common Stock    Percentage      Company
                                      Owned(a)         Owned(b)      Common Stock
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>                <C>              <C>
William P. Fricks...............  406,152 (c)(d)        1.16%           258,391
Hon. Gerald L. Baliles..........    4,363 (c)             *               1,665
Leon A. Edney, Admiral (Ret.)...    4,263 (c)             *               1,665
Dr. William R. Harvey...........    4,263 (c)             *               1,665
Dana G. Mead....................   20,780 (c)(e)          *               1,665
Dr. Joseph J. Sisco.............    5,362 (c)             *               1,665
Stephen R. Wilson...............    4,263 (c)             *               1,665
Thomas C. Schievelbein..........  185,954 (c)(d)          *             118,323
David J. Anderson...............   83,911 (c)(d)          *              33,329
Stephen B. Clarkson.............   96,067 (c)(d)          *              57,275
Alfred Little, Jr...............   50,953 (c)(d)          *              23,161
All directors and executive
 officers as a group
 (23 persons)................... 1,432,575 (c)(d)(e)    4.09%           849,428
First Manhattan Co.
 437 Madison Avenue
 New York, New York 10022....... 2,895,814 (f)          8.26%
Massachusetts Financial Services
 Company
 500 Boylston Street, 15th Floor
 Boston, Massachusetts 02116.... 4,431,029 (g)         12.63%
Perry Corp.
 599 Lexington Avenue, 36th Floor
 New York, New York 10022....... 2,049,300 (h)          5.84%
Neuberger Berman, LLC
 605 Third Avenue
 New York, New York 10158-3698.. 2,249,220 (i)          6.41%
</TABLE>

     (a)  Except as  described  in the notes  below,  each  director,  executive
     officer and 5% holder has sole voting and dispositive power over the shares
     beneficially owned, as set forth in this column.

     (b) Except as indicated,  each person or group  beneficially owns less than
     1% of the  outstanding  Company  Common  Stock.  Percentages  are  based on
     35,068,024 shares of Company Common Stock outstanding as of April 15, 1999.

     (c)  Includes  options to acquire  shares of Company  Common  Stock held by
     Messrs. Fricks, Baliles, Edney, Harvey, Mead, Sisco, Wilson,  Schievelbein,
     Anderson,  Clarkson and Little, which may be exercised on or before May 31,
     1999, for 258,391,  1,665, 1,665,  1,665,  1,665,  1,665,  1,665,  118,323,
     33,329,  57,275,  and 23,161 shares of Company Common Stock,  respectively.
     All directors and executive officers as a group have options,  which may be
     exercised on or before May 31, 1999, for shares of Company Common Stock.

     (d) Includes  shares held under the  Company's  401(k) plan.  Shares in the
     Company's  401(k)  plan held by  Messrs.  Fricks,  Schievelbein,  Anderson,
     Clarkson  and  Little  were  10,654,   1,732,   1,122,  3,116,  and  1,055,
     respectively.  All directors and executive  officers as a group held 40,845
     shares in the 401(k) plan.

     (e) Includes shares held under the Tenneco Inc. 401(k) plan.

<PAGE>

     (f) The number of shares  owned is as  reported  in  Schedule  13G filed by
     First Manhattan Co. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
     11, 1999.  First Manhattan Co.  reported sole voting and dispositive  power
     for 88,300 and shared  voting power for  2,712,364  and shared  dispositive
     power for 2,807,514 of the shares beneficially owned.

     (g) The number of shares  owned is as  reported  in  Schedule  13G filed by
     Massachusetts  Financial  Services Company with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission on February 11, 1999.  Massachusetts  Financial Services Company
     reported  sole  voting  power for 363,829  and sole  dispositive  power for
     431,029 of the shares beneficially owned.

     (h) The number of shares  owned is as  reported  in  Schedule  13G filed by
     Perry Corp.  with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on February 16,
     1999.  Perry Corp. and Richard C. Perry reported sole voting and investment
     power for all shares beneficially owned.

     (i) The number of shares  owned is as  reported  in  Schedule  13G filed by
     Neuberger  Berman,  LLC with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on
     February 9, 1999.  Neuberger  Berman,  LLC  reported  sole voting power for
     905,220  and  shared  voting  power for  1,326,600  such  shares and shared
     dispositive power for all of such shares.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Governor  Baliles,  a director of the  Company,  is a partner in the law firm of
Hunton & Williams.  Hunton & Williams has provided legal services to the Company
during the last two years.


<PAGE>





                                 PART IV

ITEM 14.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)  1.  Financial Statements

         Financial Statements required by this Item have been included in Item
         8. Refer to the "Index to Financial Statements" set forth in Item 8.

     2.  Financial Statement Schedules

         No financial statement schedules are submitted because they are either
         not applicable, not required, or not material.

     3. Exhibits - See Index on PAGES 64 TO 66.


<PAGE>


(b)  Reports on Form 8-K

     During the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company
     filed one Current Report on Form 8-K reporting the effect, in conjunction
     with applicable provisions under the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws
     dated October 12, 1998, of the amendments to Rule 14a-4(c) under the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, adopted in May 1998 by the
     Securities and Exchange Commission.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, HAS DULY
CAUSED THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 ON FORM 10-K/A TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE
UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

                                 NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.

Date: 4/30/99                    By: /s/ William P. Fricks
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                             William P. Fricks
                                               Chairman and
                                          Chief Executive Officer

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS
AMENDMENT NO. 1 ON FORM 10-K/A HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON
BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.

               SIGNATURE                       TITLE

/s/ William P. Fricks*                 Chairman and                Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------        Chief Executive Officer
 William P. Fricks


/s/ David J. Anderson                  Senior Vice President and   Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------        Chief Financial Officer
David J. Anderson


/s/ Charles P. Wingfield, Jr.          Vice President and          Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------        Controller
Charles P. Wingfield, Jr.


/s/ Gerald L. Baliles*                 Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Hon. Gerald L. Baliles


/s/ Leon A. Edney*                     Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Leon A. Edney, Admiral (Ret.)


/s/ Dr. William R. Harvey*             Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Dr. William R. Harvey


/s/ Dana G. Mead*                      Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Dana G. Mead


/s/ Dr. Joseph J. Sisco*               Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Dr. Joseph J. Sisco


/s/ Stephen R. Wilson*                 Director                    Date: 4/30/99
-------------------------------
Stephen R. Wilson


*Executed by the undersigned attorney-in-fact in the name and on behalf of the
named executive and directors pursuant to powers of attorney filed as Exhibit
24.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-12385).


                         By: /s/ Peter A. V. Huegel
                            __________________________
                            Peter A. V. Huegel
                            Attorney-in-fact




<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT
NUMBER                       DESCRIPTION
-------                      -----------

3.1           Restated  Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated as of
              December 11, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).


3.2           Amended  and  Restated  By-laws of the  Company  dated as of
              October 12, 1998. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on January 22, 1999
              (File No. 1-12385)).

4.1           Specimen Certificate of the Company's Common Stock. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
              Form 10 dated October 30, 1996, as amended (Registration No.
              1-12385)).


4.2           Form of Rights Agreement dated as of June 10, 1998, between the
              Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights
              Agent. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Registration Statement on Form 8A, dated June 10, 1998, (File No.
              001-12385)).

4.3           Form of Certificate of Voting Powers, Designations, Preferences
              and Relative Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights and
              Qualifications, Limitations or Restrictions of Series A
              Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock of the Company. (Attached
              as Exhibit A to the Rights Agreement incorporated herein by
              reference as Exhibit 4.2 hereto).

4.4           Form of Right Certificate. (Attached as Exhibit B to the Rights
              Agreement incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.2 hereto).

4.5           Certificate of Elimination of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.'s
              Series A Participating Junior Preferred Stock. (filed in
              connection with the expiration of the Company's previous Rights
              Agreement), dated June 4, 1998 (Incorporated herein by reference
              to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8A, dated June 10,
              1998, (File No. 001-12385)).

4.6           Form of Senior Note issued on March 13, 1997 including Guarantees.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration
              Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as amended
              (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.7           Form of Senior Subordinated Note issued on March 13, 1997
              including Guarantees. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.8           Senior Note Indenture dated as of November 26, 1996. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
              Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as amended (Registration No.
              333-20285)). Senior Subordinated Note Indenture dated as of
              November 26, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.10          First Supplemental Senior Note Indenture dated as December 11,
              1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as
              amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.11          First Supplemental Senior Subordinated Note Indenture dated as of
              December 11, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.12          Senior Notes Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November
              26, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as
              amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

4.13          Senior Subordinated Notes Registration Rights Agreement dated as
              of November 26, 1996. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.1          Distribution  Agreement  dated as of  November  1, 1996 among
              Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on
              Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as amended (Registration No.
              333-20285)).

<PAGE>

10.2          Amendment No. 1 to  Distribution  Agreement  dated as of December
              11, 1996 by and among Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the
              Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as
              amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.3          Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
              June 19, 1996, among El Paso Natural Gas Company, El Paso Merger
              Company and Tenneco Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.4          Debt and Cash Allocation Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996
              among Tenneco Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration
              Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as amended
              (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.5          Benefits  Agreement,  dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco
              Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (Incorporated herein by
              reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4
              dated January 23, 1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.6          Insurance  Agreement,  dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco
              Inc., New Tenneco Inc. and the Company. (Incorporated herein by
              reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4
              dated January 23, 1997, as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.7          Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of December 11, 1996 among Tenneco
              Inc., the Company, New Tenneco Inc. and El Paso Natural Gas
              Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23, 1997, as
              amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.8          First Amendment to the Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of December
              11, 1996 among Tenneco Inc., the Company, New Tenneco Inc., and El
              Paso Natural Gas Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated January 23,
              1997 as amended (Registration No. 333-20285)).

10.9*         Subcontract EB-96-2100-010 between the Company and Electric Boat
              Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, Inc., concerning
              the construction of four Virginia Class attack submarines for the
              U.S. Navy (without schedules, appendices or exhibits thereto).

10.10         Award/Contract N00024-95-C-2106, issued by Naval Sea Systems
              Command to Newport News Shipbuilding for Aircraft Carrier CVN-76.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration
              Statement on Form 10 dated October 30, 1996, as amended
              (Registration No. 1-12385)).

10.11*        Employment agreement dated February 4, 1999, between William P.
              Fricks and the Company.

10.12         Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. David J.
              Anderson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
              Company, dated June 1, 1998. (Incorporated herein by reference to
              the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
              June 21, 1998 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.13         Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Thomas C.
              Schievelbein, Executive Vice President of the Company, dated June
              1, 1998. (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 21, 1998
              (File No. 1-12385)).

10.14         Newport News  Shipbuilding  Inc.  Stock  Ownership  Plan.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report
              on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (File No.
              1-12385)).

10.15         Amendment  No. 1 to  Newport  News  Shipbuilding  Inc.  Stock
              Ownership Plan, effective as of July 1, 1997. (Incorporated herein
              by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
              the quarter ended September 21, 1997 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.16         Amendment  No. 2 to Newport News  Shipbuilding  Inc.  Stock
              Ownership Plan, effective as of October 8, 1997. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
              for the quarter ended September 21, 1997 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.17         Amendment  No. 3 to Newport  News  Shipbuilding  Inc.  Stock
              Ownership Plan, effective as of May 16, 1997. (Incorporated herein
              by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
              the quarter ended September 21, 1997 (File No. 1-12385)).

<PAGE>

10.18         1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News  Shipbuilding Inc.
              and First Amendment. (Incorporated herein by reference to the
              Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
              31, 1996 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.19         Amendment No. 2 to 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News
              Shipbuilding Inc., effective as of October 9, 1997. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
              for the quarter ended September 21, 1997 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.20         Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-employee Directors.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Annual Report
              on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (File No.
              1-12385)).

10.21         Deferred Compensation Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to
              the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
              December 31, 1996 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.22*        Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Change in Control Severance Benefit
              Plan for Key Executives as Amended and Restated Effective March
              23, 1999.

10.23         Newport News  Shipbuilding Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration
              Statement on Form S-8 filed on October 19 , 1998 (Registration No.
              333-65877)).

10.24         Contract (N00024-94-C-2105) between the Company and the United
              States Navy for work necessary to prepare and make ready for the
              refueling, overhaul, alteration, repair, and maintenance of the
              USS Nimitz (CVN 68) and its reactor plants (without schedules,
              appendices or exhibits thereto). (Incorporated by reference to the
              Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
              June 21, 1998 (File No.1-12385)).

10.25         Modification No. P00016 of Contract (N00024-94-C-2105), effective
              April 16, 1998, between the Company and the United States Navy
              (without schedules, appendices or exhibits thereto). (Incorporated
              by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
              the quarter ended June 21, 1998 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.26         Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 19, 1999, among
              the Company, Ares Acquisition Corporation, a wholly-owned
              subsidiary of the Company, and Avondale Industries, Inc.
              (Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Current Report
              on Form 8-K, filed on January 22, 1999 (File No.
              1-12385)).

10.27         Parent Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 19, 1999,
              between the Company and Avondale Industries, Inc. (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
              filed on January 22, 1999 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.28         Company Stock Option Agreement dated as of January 19, 1999,
              between Avondale Industries, Inc. and the Company (Incorporated
              herein by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K,
              filed on January 22, 1999 (File No. 1-12385)).

10.29*        Third Amendment to the 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport
              News Shipbuilding Inc.

10.30*        First Amendment to the Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Deferred
              Compensation Plan, effective December 15, 1998.

10.31*        Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration
              Plan, effective as of January 1, 1998.

10.32*        First Amendment to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Deferred
              Compensation Plan for Nonemployee Directors.

10.33*        Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement
              Plan

10.34*        First Amendment to Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement
              Benefit Restoration Plan.


21.1*         Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

24.1*         Powers of Attorney.

27.1*         Financial Data Schedule.

*    Filed herewith.


Exhibits 10.11, 10.12, 10.13, 10.14, 10.15, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18, 10.19, 10.20,
10.21, 10.22, 10.23, 10.29, 10.30, 10.31, 10.32, 10.33, and 10.34 hereto
constitute management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements within the
meaning of Item 14(a)(3) of Form 10-K.