alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Nevada Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Nevada Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 213,422 | 219,981 | 236,237
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 256,119 | 283,307 | 295,714 | 305,099 | 336,353 | 364,112 | 393,783 | 426,221 | 458,737 | 490,029
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 520,233 | 550,850 | 580,319 | 610,756 | 648,551 | 688,058 | 726,772 | 750,570 | 758,315 | 760,391
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 764,435 | 772,880 | 782,759 | 794,150 | 808,970 | 824,039 | 838,859 | 854,518 | 871,236 | 887,612
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 906,016 | 922,888 | 936,598 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant(1)



|                                                          |  |                                       
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Subsidiary(2)
(Name under which subsidiary does business) |  | State of Incorporation or Organization
|Hallmark Investment Group, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                              
|Hallmark Rehabilitation GP, LLC                           |  | Delaware                              
|SHG Resources, LP                                         |  | Delaware                              
|Summit Care Corporation                                   |  | Delaware                              
|Signature Hospice and Home Health                         |  | Delaware                              



|(1) | Subsidiaries for purposes of this Exhibit 21 include corporations, limited liability companies and limited partnerships directly or indirectly wholly-owned
by Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Names of subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary (as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of
Regulation S-X) as of December 31, 2010, are omitted.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 20

- 3710

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.
Daniel Gray Eagle, also known as Daniel Grey Eagle

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Central

____________

Submitted: October 22, 2021 Filed: January 31, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM

.

After a three

- day trial, a jury convicted Daniel Gray Eagle of : (1) conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine; (2) possession with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detect a ble amount of meth on January 22, 2018; and (3) possession with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detect a ble
amount of meth on March 1, 2018.- 2

- On appeal, Gray Eagle challenges the sufficiency of the evidence support ing
his conviction , arguing the witnesses were not credible. This Court reviews “the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jur y’ s verdict and reversing the verdict only if no reasonable jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Shelledy , 961 F.3d 1014, 1019 (8th Cir. 2020), quoting United States
v. Ramos , 852 F.3d 747, 753 (8th Cir. 2017). “A jury’s credibility determinations
are well

- nigh unreviewable because the jury is in the best position to assess the credibility of witnesses and resolve inconsistent testimony.” United States v.
Trotter , 837 F.3d 864, 868 (8th Cir. 2016), quoti ng United States v. Hodge , 594 F.3d 614, 618 (8th Cir. 2010).

After a careful review of the record, this Court concludes that the government produced sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The government presented 12 witnesses at trial, inc luding two who sold meth to Gray Eagle, three
who purchased it from Gray Eagle or someone to whom he had sold it, and various police officers who discovered it in Gray Eagle’s possession four time s. Many
witnesses corroborated one

- another’s testimony. “[T] he jury was entitled to make credibility determinations and reject [Gray Eagle’s] theory of the case .” United States v. Shelabarger , 770 F.3d 714, 717 (8th Cir. 2014) ; see also United States v. Aldridge , 664 F.3d 705, 715 (8th Cir. 2011) (“The jury has the sole responsibility to resolve conflicts or contradictions in testimony, and credibility determinations are resolved in favor of the verdict.”)

.

This Court affirms Gray Eagle’s conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

* * * * * * *

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
September 3, 2015

Dear Mr. McCarty:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

− 2015

− 2589). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 9/17/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
# C_2018073EN.01000601.xml

| 27.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/282 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria apply

(2018/C 73/05)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/282 (3).

2

3

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/282.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).

4

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 54 I, 26.2.2018, p. 3.

3

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

4

---
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        | --     | 12.07  | --     | --     | --     | 3.76   | 6.13   | 5.07   | 4.98  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.28   | 7.10   | 13.34  | 6.94   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-403]


Certain Acesulfame Potassium and Blends and Products Containing 
Same; Notice of Commission Determination not to Review Initial 
Determination Granting Motion to Amend the Complaint and Notice of 
Investigation to Add an Additional Respondent

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting 
complainant's motion for leave to amend the complaint and to amend the 
notice of investigation to add an additional respondent.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Cynthia P. Johnson, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-3098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this patent-based 
section 337 investigation on November 20, 1997, based on a complaint 
filed by Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties and Food Ingredients GmbH and 
Nutrinova, Inc. (``Nutrinova''). Four respondents were originally named 
in the investigation--Hangzhou Sanhe Food Company, Ltd.; JRS 
International, Inc.; Dingsheng, Inc.; and WYZ Tech, Inc.
    On February 10, 1998, Nutrinova filed, pursuant to Commission rule 
210.14(b), 19 CFR 210.14(b), a motion for leave to amend the complaint 
and for issuance by the ALJ of an ID amending the notice of 
investigation to add Hangzhou Sanhe Food Additives Factory as a 
respondent. No oppositions to the motion were filed.
    The ALJ granted Nutrinova's motion in an ID (Order No. 7) issued on 
April 1, 1998. No petitions for review were filed.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and Commission rule 
210.42, 19 CFR 210.42. Copies of the ALJ's ID and all other 
nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation 
are or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov).

    Issued: May 4, 1998.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12453 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6415

DEREK MARQUIS FLEMING,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden, FCC Petersburg,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-01-582)

Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: July 6, 2005

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Marquis Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Derek Marquis Fleming, a federal prisoner, seeks to

appeal the district court’s order construing his motion filed under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) as a successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction, and the court’s

orders denying his motions for reconsideration. The orders are not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Fleming has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

In accordance with United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d

200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 995 (2003), we construe

Fleming’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an

application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. In order
- 3 -

to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a

prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of

constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the

Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly

discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear

and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have

found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2),

2255 ¶ 8 (2000). Fleming’s claims do not satisfy either of these

conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize Fleming to file a

successive § 2255 motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 96,711  | 97,939  | 99,721 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 105,164 | 117,675 | 125,174 | 125,571 | 132,378 | 130,318 | 133,445 | 135,553 | 135,417 | 133,464
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 133,969 | 135,968 | 137,924 | 140,057 | 141,258 | 142,148 | 143,632 | 142,965 | 141,529 | 140,633
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 138,670 | 138,214 | 144,906 | 142,495 | 143,134 | 141,439 | 138,441 | 135,580 | 121,384 | 114,964
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 115,267 | 115,778 | 116,436 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024