### 22807 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2014 / Notices

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202–418– 5516.
Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant. [FR Doc. 2014–09474 Filed 4–22–14; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION** 
**Sunshine Act Meetings**

**TIME AND DATE :**  10:00 a.m., Friday, May 30, 2014.
**PLACE :**  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

**STATUS :**  Closed.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.cftc.gov

. **CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202–418– 5516.
Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant. [FR Doc. 2014–09475 Filed 4–22–14; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION** 
**Sunshine Act Meetings**

**TIME AND DATE :**  10:00 a.m., Friday, May 9, 2014.
**PLACE :**  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

**STATUS :**  Closed.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202–418– 5516.
Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant. [FR Doc. 2014–09472 Filed 4–22–14; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING**  **COMMISSION**
**Sunshine Act Meetings**

**TIME AND DATE :**  10:00 a.m., Friday, May 2, 2014.

**PLACE :**  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

**STATUS :**  Closed.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.cftc.gov

. **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202–418–
5516.
Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant. [FR Doc. 2014–09410 Filed 4–22–14; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION** 
**Sunshine Act Meetings**

**TIME AND DATE :**  10:00 a.m., Friday, May 16, 2014.

**PLACE :**  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

**STATUS :**  Closed.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.cftc.gov

. **CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202–418–
5516.
Natise Allen,
Executive Assistant. [FR Doc. 2014–09473 Filed 4–22–14; 4:15 pm]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE** 
**Office of the Secretary**
**[Docket ID DoD–2014–HA–0010]**
**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by May 27, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Fred Licari, 571–372–0493.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Title, Associated Form and Omb Number: TRICARE Award Fee Provider Survey; OMB Control Number 0720– 0048.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 1224. Responses Per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 1224. Average Burden Per Response: 5 minutes.

Annual Burden Hours: 102. Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary to obtain and record TRICARE network civilian provider-user satisfaction with the administrative processes/services of managed care support contractors (MCSC) in three TRICARE regions within the United States (North, West, and South) and three regions internationally (Europe, Pacific and Latin America). The survey will obtain provider opinions regarding claims processing, customer service, and administrative support by the TRICARE regional contractors. The reports of findings from these surveys, coupled with performance criteria from other sources, will be used by the TRICARE Regional Administrative Contracting Officers to determine award fees.

Affected Public: Individuals orhouseholds; businesses or other forprofit; not for-profit institutions.

Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. OMb Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer. Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Mr. John Kraemer at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:


### 22808 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2014 / Notices

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.

DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.

Dated: April 21, 2014. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2014–09310 Filed 4–23–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**
**Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers** 
**Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Boise River**  **General Investigation Feasibility Study, Ada and Canyon Counties, in the State**  **of Idaho**

**AGENCY :**  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.

**ACTION :**  Notice of intent.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Boise River General Investigation Feasibility Study. The Feasibility Study will evaluate alternatives to reduce flood risk and meet current and future water supply needs in the lower Boise River watershed. To the extent feasible, the study will also seek to provide ancillary ecosystem restoration benefits, minimize impacts to species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), including bull trout, and minimize socioeconomic effects. The Feasibility Study will focus on the lower Boise River, a tributary to the Snake River, which is located in southwestern Idaho, primarily in Ada and Canyon Counties. The non-federal sponsor for this effort is the Idaho Water Resources Board. Almost 40 percent of Idaho residents live in the Boise River watershed, with one-sixth of the State’s population residing in the floodplain. Communities and development along the Boise River have experienced repeated minor flooding, and flood risk management experts emphasize that a significant flood event with major flood damage will likely occur in the future. The Boise River watershed has recently experienced the most significant growth in the State and continuing to meet current and future water needs is a major concern for residents and state/ local officials.
**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments on the alternatives or scope of analysis for the EIS to Mr. Tim Fleeger, Project Manager, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, CENWW–PM–PD–PF, 201 North Third Avenue, Walla Walla, WA 99362.
**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Requests for further information should be directed to Mr. Tim Fleeger by phone at (509) 527–7247 or by email at BoiseGI@usace.army.mil.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This study was authorized by Section 414 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–53) as amended by Section 4038 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 100– 114). Collectively, these two acts grant the Corps authority to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking flood risk management, water supply and ecosystem restoration on the Boise River. The Idaho Water Resources Board is authorized to study solutions for water supply and flood risk management, but is not authorized to expend funds studying ecosystem restoration. Therefore, the proposed Feasibility Study is focused on reducing flood risk and meeting current and future water supply needs along the Boise River, while seeking incidental environmental benefits to the extent feasible.

The Boise River is approximately 102 miles in length, is located entirely within the State of Idaho, and is one of the major tributaries to the Snake River. The lower Boise River watershed (the focus of the Feasibility Study) contains the Boise River drainage from Lucky Peak Dam to its confluence with the Snake River in southwest Idaho (roughly 64 miles). The lower Boise River floodplain encompasses primarily Ada and Canyon Counties, and includes the cities of Boise (state capital), Garden City, Meridian, Eagle, Star, Nampa, Middleton, Caldwell, Notus, and Parma. The Boise metropolitan area is the third largest in the Pacific Northwest after Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon.

The Boise River is highly regulated. Natural flows are modified by the three Federal storage projects on the upper river which are jointly operated by the Corps (Lucky Peak Dam) and the Bureau of Reclamation (Arrowrock and Anderson Ranch Dams) as a system for the primary purposes of flood risk reduction and irrigation water supply. Additional project facilities include Lake Lowell, an offstream storage reservoir operated by the Bureau of Reclamation, and numerous diversion canals that are federally or privately operated. Operation of the Federal reservoirs is a balancing act between reducing flood risk and having sufficient irrigation water for crops by mid-late summer. Recreation, hydropower, and general fish and wildlife functions are secondary authorized purposes. Water is not released for these purposes unless reservoir storage space is assigned for that specific purpose. A non-continuous series of non-Federal levees line the Boise River through developed areas in downtown Boise, Garden City and Eagle. A few are inspected through the Corps’ Levee Safety Program, but the majority are unregulated and not maintained.

Complex, interconnected surface water and aquifer systems supply current water uses in the valley which includes irrigation and domestic, commercial, municipal, and industrial (DCMI) uses. Natural flow, stored surface water, and ground water are reused in multiple locations across the valley through a network of drains and direct discharge into the river. Surface water supplies an estimated 90 percent of the current DCMI water demand. Approximately 77 percent of the annual Boise River flow occurs as snowpack runoff during the March to July period.

The Corps will evaluate alternatives for their ability to reduce flood risk and provide water supply to the region. The preliminary range of alternatives will include, but is not limited to the following:

• No Action;

• Modification of Arrowrock Dam to provide additional flood risk management and water supply;

• Modification of Arrowrock Dam along with downstream structural modifications, non-structural measures, and modifications to existing undeveloped lands to reduce effects from localized flooding;

• Manage aquifer recharge to address future water supply along with downstream structural modifications, non-structural measures, and