alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to El Salvador (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2023                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 1   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0  
|2024                                                                                                                              | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   | 0   |     |     |     |     |     |     |    
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC UIT MARCH 21, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]

I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 14466 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 6 - 8 0 8 3 3 - C V- DT KH F I O N A W H I T E , N O R D I A G O R D O N , i nd i vi du al l y and on behal f of o th e r s s im ila r lys itu a te d , P la in tif f s – A p p e lla n ts , J E A N E . B A R R E A U , e t a l., P la in tif f s , v ersu s S E N I O R H E A L T H C A R E S E R V I C E S , I N C ., a F l o ri d a co rp o rat i o n fo rm erl y k n o w n a s S tr a w C o n s u ltin g , I n c ., D e f e n d a n t– A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ar c h 21, 2008)2

B efo re B IR C H , D U B IN A an d B A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: W e f in d n o e rr o rin th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t th e p la in tif f s f a ll w ith in th e “c o m p a n io n s h ip s e rv ic e s ” e x e m p tio n to th e F a irL ab o rS ta n d a r d s A c t, 2 9 C .F .R . § 2 1 3 ( a ) ( 1 5 ) , b e c au s e th e y c o n c e d e d th a t— in th e w o r d s o f th e ir op po si t i on t o the defendant ’ s m ot i on for j ud gm enton the pl ea di ng s— they “ ar e c om pa ni on s e rvi c e s e m pl oy e e s e m pl oy e d by [ the de f e nda nt ] . ” W e do notf

i nd pers uasi ve the pl ai nt i ff

s’ att em pton appeal t o q ual i fythatand o ther s i m i l ar s ta te m e n ts a s c o n c e d in g o n lyth a t th e p la in tif f s p e r f o rm e d s o m e c o m p a n io n s h ip se rvi ce s, such thatthere m i gh tbe an i ss ue of fa ctas t o w hether they per form ed su ff icien t co m p an io n sh ip se rv ices to fa ll w ith in th e D ep ar tm en t o f L ab o r’s de f i ni t i on of “ c om pa ni ons hi p s e rvi c e s . ” S e e 29 C . F . R . § 552. 6. T he j ud gm entof the di stri ctcourti s there fore A FFI R M ED .
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 20 IO

__ -NM- 076

__ -AD Executive Order 12866: I Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) YES () explain NO (X)

YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is itlappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? 

# I
January 7, 2013

No. 12-5832.

#### Blackwell *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Miller*v. *Alabama,*567 U. S. 460 (2012).
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Arkansas Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Arkansas Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 2      | 3      | 53     | 72     | 90    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 99     | 125    | 126    | 154    | 173    | 11     | 10     | 13     | 12     | 11    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 21     | 21     | 27     | 32     | 32     | 43     | 44     | 49     | 70    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 78     | 83     | 89     | 73     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November 15, 2010 |   |  /s/ R. LaDuane Clifton |
|-------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|              |   | Name:                        | R. LaDuane Clifton |
|              |   | Title:                       | Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
No. 12-585.

#### Hayes *v.*Questar Capital Corp.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|No chart available.                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                         
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Nebraska Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
FILED

September 28, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) For Publication

)

Appellee, ) Filed:

)

v. ) Shelby County

)

CLARENCE C. NESBIT ) Hon. Arthur T. Bennett, Judge

)

Appellant. ) No. 02-S-01-9705-CR-00043

DISSENTING OPINION

I must respectfully dissent from the part of the majority

opinion concerning victim impact evidence. Because I acknowledge

that Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 111 S. Ct. 2597, 115 L.

Ed.2d 720 (1991), controls, I agree with the majority’s statement

that victim impact evidence is admissible if adduced within the

constraints of due process and Tenn. R. Evid. 403. I disagree,

however, with the majority’s conclusion that the victim impact

evidence used in this case was adduced within those constraints.

Although legally admissible, the reasons for excluding

victim impact evidence are still compelling in my view.

Particularly troublesome is the issue of relevance. This is true

because the character of the victim and the effect on the victim’s

family may be wholly unrelated to the blameworthiness of the

defendant. Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496, 504, 107 S. Ct. 2529,

2534, 96 L. Ed.2d 440, 449 (1987). Generally, victim impact

evidence is unsettling because its use encourages the jury to
2

quantify the value of the victim’s life and urges the finding that

murder is more reprehensible if the victim is survived by a

bereaved family than if the victim had no family at all. See id.

at 505, 107 S. Ct. at 2534, 96 L. Ed.2d at 450. 

Addressing the particular evidence introduced in this

case, the majority describes the five pages of victim impact

evidence as “clear and concise.” However, as Judge Gary R. Wade

explained in his partial dissent from the Court of Criminal

Appeals’s ruling below, the victim impact evidence allowed in Payne

and other Tennessee cases comprises only a few lines of testimony.

I therefore view the victim impact evidence in this case as

protracted and, consequently, prone to be unfairly prejudicial. In

addition, the State’s rebuttal argument was based on the impact of

the victim’s death upon her family. In this argument, the State

pervasively characterized the victim impact evidence as an

aggravating factor to be weighed against the mitigating proof. The

majority concedes that the argument was error but finds that the

error did not appear to have affected the verdict to the

defendant’s prejudice. 

I, like Judge Wade, cannot conclude that the State’s

argument, considered with the lengthy victim impact testimony, did

not affect the verdict. In so stating, I draw no conclusions

regarding the penalty imposed. I find only that a jury should be

allowed to reconsider the penalty under the correct sentencing

guidelines. I would remand this case for a new sentencing hearing.

 _______________________________

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., Justice
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of the Companys Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241)

I, James D. Bennett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of SandRidge Energy, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ James D. BennettJames D. BennettPresident and Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 30, 2013
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

I.L., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-395

[February 13, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Yael Gamm, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-000041-DL-00C.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marc B. Hernandez, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 4      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Elba Island, GA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Nigeria  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Elba Island, GA Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Nigeria  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 2,895  | 0      | 0      | 3,153  | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,693  | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Brian Wynne et al., Respondents, v Vincent Destaso et al., Defendants, and State of New York et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 379]

*842In an action to recover for damage to real property, the defendants State of New York and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 9, 2002, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 325 (a) to remove the action to the Court of Claims.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs’ property was flooded on or about September 16, 1999, following the failure of Hygena Lake Dam, which is privately owned and operated, and located in the Town of Clarkstown in Rockland County. They subsequently filed an action in the Supreme Court alleging negligence and the appellants moved, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2), to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them due to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Supreme Court denied the motion and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion pursuant to CPLR 325 (a) to remove the claims against the appellants to the Court of Claims “without prejudice to the right of the State of New York and the Department of Environmental Conservation of the State of New York to assert any jurisdictional objection or other objection under the Court of Claims Act with regard to plaintiffs’ cause of action.”

The Supreme Court has the inherent authority, pursuant to CPLR 325 (a) and NY Constitution, article VI, § 19 (a), to transfer actions filed therein to any other court having jurisdiction over the subject matter including, but not limited to, the Court of Claims *(see State of New York v Jacobs,*167 AD2d 876, 877 [1990]). The order dated July 9, 2002, made no determination with respect to whether the plaintiffs satisfied that court’s jurisdictional prerequisites *(cf. State of New York v Dewey,*260 AD2d 924 [1999]; *Nish v Town of Poestenkill,*179 AD2d 929, 930 [1992]) but merely removed the action to the appropriate forum *(see Matter of Gross v Perales,*72 NY2d 231, 235 [1988]; *Nominee Realty v State of New York,*233 AD2d 426, 427 [1996]) without prejudice to the appellants’ right to pursue dismissal therein. Goldstein, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.