alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Kansas Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Kansas Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | --    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Germany (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan   | Feb | Mar   | Apr   | May | Jun   | Jul   | Aug | Sep   | Oct   | Nov   | Dec  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | --- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----
|2022                                                                                                                              |       |     |       |       |     |       |       |     |       |       |       | 3,686
|2023                                                                                                                              | 3,511 |     | 3,399 | 3,657 |     | 5,299 | 3,381 |     | 3,702 | 1,860 | 3,763 | 7,014
|2024                                                                                                                              | 3,472 |     |       |       |     |       |       |     |       |       |       |      
|                                                                                                                                 
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### SLACK v. RICH.

No. 10434.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued April 13, 1950.

Decided June 19, 1950.

Mr. William A. Powell, Washington, D. C. , for appellant.

Mr. Charles Sumner Brown, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before PROCTOR, BAZELON and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PROCTOR, Circuit Judge.

The question here is whether an order of the District Court dismissing a prior action is *res judicata*of the present action.

In the earlier case, Sarah L. Slack, appellant (hereafter referred to as plaintiff), sued Charles W. Rich for personal injuries. Before trial Rich died. Plaintiff substituted Lovey V. Rich, administratrix. She moved to dismiss upon the ground that the right of action abated with the death of Charles W. Rich. 12 D.C.Code (1940) § 101.1 The plaintiff, adpiitting Rich’s death in August 1947, contended that the Act of June 19, 1948, 62 Stat. 487, ch. 508, § 1,2 amending the abatement statute cited above, was retroactive and revived the right of action against Rich’s legal representative. The court rejected this contention and entered an order dismissing the action. No appeal was taken.

However, on April 5, 1948, Sarah L. Slack again filed suit against Lovey V. Rich, administratrix, upon the same cause of action. The defendant, appellee here, moved to dismiss upon the ground that the order for dismissal in the former action was *res judicata.*The motion was granted and the action dismissed. This appeal follows.

We' have no doubt that the ordér for dismissal in the first suit operated “as an adjudication upon the merits” of the right of action, and is a bar to the present suit. Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. United States, 1944, 79 U.S.App.D.C. 62, 142 F.2d 571.

As there is no need to do so we express no opinion concerning the effect of the Act of June 19, 1948.

Affirmed.

1

. The Code provision in effect at the time of Rich’s death was as follows: “On the death of any person in whose favor or against whom a right of action may have accrued for any cause *emoept an injury to the person*or to the reputation, said right of action shall survive in favor of or against the legal representatives of the deceased; but *no right of action for an injury to the person,*except as provided in sections 16-1201 to 16-1203, or to the reputation, *shall so survive.*(Mar. 3, 1901, 31 Stat. 1227, ch. 854, § 235.)” (Emphasis supplied.)

2

. See 12 D.C.Code (1940, Supp. VII) § 101: “On the death of any person in whose favor or against whom a right of action may have accrued for any cause prior to his death, said right of action shall survive in favor of or against the legal representative of the deceased: *Provided, however,*That in tort actions, the said right of action shall be limited to damages for physical injury except for pain and suffering resulting therefrom. (As amended June 19, 1948, 62 Stat. 487, ch. 508 § 1.)”
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-9-16-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

May 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 30, 1998, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Tenth Revised Sheet No. 9, with a 
proposed effective date of May 1, 1998.
    National states that under Article II, Section 2, of the approved 
settlement at Docket Nos. RP94-367-000, et al., National is required to 
recalculate the maximum Interruptible Gathering (IG) rate monthly and 
to charge that rate on the first day of the following month if the 
result is an IG rate more than 2 cents above or below the IG rate as 
calculated under Section 1 of Article II. The recalculation produced an 
IG Rate of 10 cents per dth.
    National further states that, as required by Article II, Section 4, 
National is filing a revised tariff sheet within 30 days of the 
effective date for the revised IG rate.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12376 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### ABRAMSON, M. v. NOVITSKY, M.

2933 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/04/2017

No. 2010-05796

(Montgomery)

Reversed/Remanded
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATIONS**     I, J. Robert Paulson, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Restore Medical, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  J.    Robert Paulson, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer     Date: February 28, 2007
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1311

AN ACT

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1311

AN ACT

For the relief of Olga D. Zhondetskaya.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1311 ES

1 SEC. 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN NATURALIZATION REQUIRE2 MENTS FOR OLGA D. ZHONDETSKAYA.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the inability of

4 Olga D. Zhondetskaya to meet the requirements of section

5 312 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or the re6 quirements of section 316 of such Act that relate to resi7 dence and physical presence in the United States, if other8 wise qualified, she shall be considered eligible for natu9 ralization and, upon filing an application for naturaliza10 tion and being administered the oath of renunciation and

11 allegiance pursuant to section 337 of such Act, shall be

12 naturalized as a citizen of the United States.

13 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

15 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 1

16 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate July 29 (legislative day, June

30), 1993.

Attest:

Secretary.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUVENILE FEMALE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30052

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-00113-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 11, 2011** 

Before: THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges 

Juvenile Female appeals from the district court order requiring her to remain

in detention until age 19. The sentence was imposed after the district court

adjudged her to be guilty of an act of juvenile delinquency. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Juvenile Female’s counsel has filed a brief stating

FILED

AUG 12 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30052

there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of

record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26623-26624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Task Force: Public Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of a meeting of 
the Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, June 30, 1998, at 1 to 4 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be at the: Federal Building, Bureau of 
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, Conference Room E-2901, Sacramento, 
California 95825, Telephone: 916/978-5113.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Russell P. Smith, Chief, 
Environmental

[[Page 26624]]

and Natural Resource Division, Northern California Area Office, 16349 
Shasta Dam Boulevard, Shasta Lake, California, 96019. Telephone: 530/
275-1554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Task Force members will approve the Three-
Year Action Plan for FY 1999; will comment on reauthorization of the 
Trinity River Basin Fish and Wildlife Management Program; and, will 
discuss renewal of the Charter under the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. Task Force members will be briefed on the Trinity River Flow 
Evaluation and Trinity River Mainstem Fishery Restoration Environmental 
Impact Statement/Report.
    The meeting of the Task Force is open to the public. Any member of 
the public may file a written statement with the Task Force in person 
or by mail before, during, or after the meeting. To the extent that 
time permits, the Task Force Chairman may allow public presentation of 
oral statements at the meeting.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
Roger K. Patterson,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 98-12655 Filed 5-12-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-09-U
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      Of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Steven H. Wood, the Chief Financial Officer of Maytag Corporation, certify
that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the foregoing report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Maytag Corporation.

                                        /s/ Steven H. Wood
                                        ------------------
                                        Steven H. Wood, Chief Financial Officer

                                        August 9, 2002
                                        --------------
                                        Date

                                       26
Exhibit 32.1

    Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                   CERTIFICATE OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of
the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other
purpose.

     The undersigned, who are the Co-Chief Executive Officers of Cox
Technologies, Inc. ("Company") hereby certifies as follows:

     The Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q of the Company ("Report"), which
accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  03-11-05      /s/ Brian D. Fletcher            /s/ Kurt C. Reid
       --------      --------------------------       --------------------------
                     Brian D. Fletcher                Kurt C. Reid
                     Co-Chief Executive Officer       Co-Chief Executive Officer



                                       A-4
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, John E. Ritacco, is the President and Chief Executive Officer CMS Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: December 23, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Ritacco                                  
|                        |  |  |  | John E. Ritacco President and Chief Executive Officer