alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Mississippi Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Mississippi Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 6      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 7      | 8      | 9      | 10    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 11     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 11    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 11     | 11     | 11     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________ No. 06-70003

______________________ DERRICK SONNIER Petitioner - Appellant

v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Correctional Institutions Division Respondent - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division H-04-2385
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Opinion, 1/22/07 5th Cir., Sonnier v. Quarterman, 2007 WL 136460) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D March 9, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III2

PER CURIAM: It is ordered that the petitioner-appellant’s Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. In light of petitioner-appellant’s brief in support of his petition for rehearing, we have carefully reconsidered our panel opinion and reiterate that
our denial of a certificate of appealability (“COA”) is based upon Sonnier’s failure to make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Applying the Supreme Court’s analysis established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the district court determined that Sonnier failed to show that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment. Our panel opinion clearly held that Sonnier “failed to demonstrate that3

jurists of reason coulddisagree with the district court’s resolutionof his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude that the issues presentedare adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, as required by the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) in Miller El v. Cockrell.” Sonnier v. Quarterman, 2007 WL 136460 at *14. As a result, we denied his request for a COA. After careful considerationof Sonnier’s brief in support of his petition forpanel rehearing, we still do not believe that he is entitled to a COA. “By enacting AEDPA,. . . Congress confirmed the necessity and the requirement of differential treatment for those appeals deserving of attention from those that plainly do not. . . [I]ssuance of
a COA must not be pro forma or a matter of course.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 3374

(2003). Sonnier argues that the panel delved too deeply into the merits of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. However, “[t]he COA determinationunder § 2253(c) requires anoverview of the claims in the habeas petition and a general assessment of their merits.” Id. at 336. And our threshold inquiry into Sonnier’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim revealed that reasonable jurists would not find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claim debatable or wrong. Specifically, no reasonable jurist would find debatable or wrong that Sonnier had failed to show prejudice as required by Strickland. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1475

To revise the boundaries of the Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To revise the boundaries of the Hagerman Fossil Beds

National Monument, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hagerman Fossil Beds

5 National Monument Boundary Revision Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY REVISION.

7 Section 302(a) of the Arizona-Idaho Conservation

8 Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4571) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) The Secretary’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘(a)(1) The Secretary’’; and
2

•S 1475 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) The Secretary is authorized to acquire from will4 ing sellers, by donation, with donated or appropriated

5 funds, or exchange, not more than 65 acres outside the

6 boundary depicted on the map referred to in section 301

7 for the purpose of developing the land and operating re8 search, information, interpretive, and administrative facili9 ties. Lands acquired and facilities developed under this

10 paragraph shall be administered by the Secretary as part

11 of the monument. The boundary of the monument shall

12 be modified to include the lands added under this para13 graph as a noncontiguous parcel.’’.

Æ
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Maine Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Maine Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 12,134 | 11,933 | 11,902
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 12,000 | 12,424 | 13,766 | 13,880 | 14,104 | 14,917 | 14,982 | 15,221 | 15,646 | 15,247
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 17,111 | 17,302 | 17,921 | 18,385 | 18,707 | 18,633 | 18,824 | 18,921 | 19,571 | 20,806
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 21,142 | 22,461 | 23,555 | 24,765 | 27,047 | 31,011 | 32,708 | 33,750 | 34,874 | 36,557
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37,653 | 38,421 | 35,593 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied Cove Point, MD Natural Gas Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Price of Liquefied Cove Point, MD Natural Gas Exports to United Kingdom (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 6.36   | 6.72  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.03   | 7.29   | 11.52  | 6.35   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7326.

#### Cardenas *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1422 Referred in House (RFH)]

103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 1422

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1994

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interpose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Court of Federal Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment on any 
claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United 
States with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New 
Mexico or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise 
which were acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate 
compensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate 
compensation, the United States Court of Federal Claims may award 
interest at a rate of 5 percent per year to accrue from the date on 
which such lands or interests therein were acquired from the tribe by 
the United States. Such jurisdiction is conferred only with respect to 
claims accruing on or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must 
be filed within three years after the date of enactment of this Act. 
Such jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any failure of the tribe 
to exhaust any available administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority, with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      12), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                MARTHA S. POPE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

,

v.

LINDSEY HRADEK

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 342

- CR

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20130D00417 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

June 11

, 201 6

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

STATE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State ’s Attor ney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before June 11 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of April , 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1515 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 345

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1515

                          [Report No. 103-218]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 9, 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 345
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1515

                          [Report No. 103-218]

   To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 1993

  Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of November 17 
 (legislative day, November 2), 1993 by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sea of Okhotsk Fisheries Enforcement 
Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. FISHING PROHIBITION.

    The Central Bering Sea Fisheries Enforcement Act of 1992 (title III 
of Public Law 102-582, 16 U.S.C. 1823 note) is amended--
            (1) in section 302, by inserting the words ``and the 
        Central Sea of Okhotsk'' after ``Central Bering Sea'';
            (2) in section 306, by renumbering paragraphs (2) through 
        (6) as paragraphs (3) through (7), respectively; and
            (3) in section 306, by inserting the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(2) Central sea of okhotsk.--The term `Central Sea of 
        Okhotsk' means the central Sea of Okhotsk area which is more 
        than two hundred nautical miles seaward of the baselines from 
        which the breadth of the territorial sea of the Russian 
        Federation is measured.''.
```
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Mississippi Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Mississippi Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4.4    | 4.1    | 3.6    | 3.4    | 3.4    | 3.1    | 2.6    | 5.2    | 5.2    | 4.0   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.4    | 4.3    | 3.3    | 4.1    | 4.3    | 4.3    | 5.1    | 11.2   | 9.6    | 9.0   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9.4    | 10.2   | 11.0   | 10.9   | 12.5   | 14.2   | 15.8   | 16.2   | 19.3   | 19.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 19.9   | 20.1   | 20.3   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024