##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 20-F





ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

Commission File Number: 001-32751





Grupo
Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Pacific Airport Group

(Translation of registrants name into English)

United Mexican States

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B

Torre Pacífico, Piso 6

Col. Rinconada del Bosque

44530 Guadalajara, Jalisco

Mexico

(Address of
principal executive offices)

Miguel Aliaga

Investor Relations Officer

maliaga@aeropuertosgap.com.mx

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.

Avenida Mariano Otero No. 1249-B

Torre Pacífico, Piso 6

Col. Rinconada del Bosque

44530 Guadalajara, Jalisco

Mexico

Telephone: + 52
(33) 38801100 ext 202

Fax: + 52 (33) 36714582

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number

and address of company contact person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



|                                                                         |  |                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|Title of each class                                                      |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
|Series B Shares                                                          |  | New York Stock Exchange, Inc.*           
|American Depositary Shares (ADSs), each representing ten Series B Shares |  | New York Stock Exchange, Inc.            





|* | Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: N/A

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual
report:



|                     |  |                 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------
|Title of each class: |  | Number of Shares
|Series B Shares      |  | 476,850,000     
|Series BB Shares     |  | 84,150,000      





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No   ̈

If this report is an
annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Note: Checking the box
above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



|                        |  |   |  |                   |  |   |  |                       |  |  
|----------------------- |  | - |  | ----------------- |  | - |  | --------------------- |  | -
|Large accelerated filer |  | x |  | Accelerated filer |  |  ̈ |  | Non-accelerated filer |  |  ̈

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this
filing:



|          |  |   |  |      |  |   |  |       |  |   |  | 
|--------- |  | - |  | ---- |  | - |  | ----- |  | - |  | 
|U.S. GAAP |  |  ̈ |  | IFRS |  | x |  | Other |  |  ̈

If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement
item the registrant has elected to follow: Item 17    Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).    Yes   ̈    No  x









---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|         |  |                                                       |  |  |     | 
|-------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  | --- | 
|         |  | Forward-Looking Statements                            |  |  | 1   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 1.  |  | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |  |  | 2   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 2.  |  | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable               |  |  | 2   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 3.  |  | Key Information                                       |  |  | 2   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Selected Financial Data                               |  |  | 2   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Exchange Rates                                        |  |  | 6   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Risk Factors                                          |  |  | 7   | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 4.  |  | Information on the Company                            |  |  | 30  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | History and Development of the Company                |  |  | 30  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Business Overview                                     |  |  | 37  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Regulatory Framework                                  |  |  | 66  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Organizational Structure                              |  |  | 84  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Property, Plant, And Equipment                        |  |  | 85  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 4A. |  | Unresolved Staff Comments                             |  |  | 85  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 5.  |  | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects          |  |  | 86  | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 6.  |  | Directors, Senior Management and Employees            |  |  | 125 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 7.  |  | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions     |  |  | 133 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Major Shareholders                                    |  |  | 133 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Related Party Transactions                            |  |  | 135 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 8.  |  | Financial Information                                 |  |  | 135 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Legal Proceedings                                     |  |  | 135 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Dividends                                             |  |  | 144 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 9.  |  | The Offer and Listing                                 |  |  | 146 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Stock Price History                                   |  |  | 146 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange                 |  |  | 147 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|Item 10. |  | Additional Information                                |  |  | 148 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Material Contracts                                    |  |  | 158 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Exchange Controls                                     |  |  | 159 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Taxation                                              |  |  | 159 | 
|         |  |                                                      
|         |  | Documents On Display                                  |  |  | 162 | 



i



---

##### Table of Contents

|          |  |                                                                              |  |  |     | 
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | --- | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 11.  |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                   |  |  | 163 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 12.  |  | Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities                       |  |  | 164 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 13.  |  | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies                              |  |  | 166 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 14.  |  | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |  |  | 166 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 15.  |  | Controls and Procedures                                                      |  |  | 166 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16.  |  | Reserved                                                                     |  |  | 168 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16A. |  | Audit Committee Financial Expert                                             |  |  | 168 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16B. |  | Code of Ethics                                                               |  |  | 168 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16C. |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                       |  |  | 169 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16D. |  | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees                   |  |  | 169 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16E. |  | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers       |  |  | 170 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16F. |  | Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant.                                |  |  | 170 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 16G. |  | Corporate Governance                                                         |  |  | 170 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 17.  |  | Financial Statements                                                         |  |  | 175 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 18.  |  | Financial Statements                                                         |  |  | 175 | 
|          |  |                                                                             
|Item 19.  |  | Exhibits                                                                     |  |  | 175 | 



ii



---

##### Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements. We may from time to time make forward-looking statements in our reports
to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on Forms 20-F and 6-K, in our annual reports to shareholders, in offering circulars and prospectuses, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by our officers,
directors or employees to financial analysts, institutional investors, representatives of the media and others. Examples of such forward-looking statements include:



| |  |  | projections of revenues, operating income, net income (loss), net income (loss) per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items or ratios,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | statements of our plans or objectives,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in our regulatory environment,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | statements about our future economic performance or that of Mexico, and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | statements of assumptions underlying such statements.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------

Words such as believe,
anticipate, plan, expect, intend, target, estimate, project, predict, forecast, guideline, should and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. We caution you that a number of important factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from the projections, plans, objectives, expectations, estimates and intentions expressed in forward-looking statements. These factors, some of which are discussed below under Risk Factors, include material
changes in the performance or terms of our concessions, developments in legal proceedings, economic and political conditions and government policies in Mexico or elsewhere, inflation rates, exchange rates, regulatory developments, customer demand
and competition. We caution you that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive and that eventualities related to other risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new
information or future developments.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I



|Item 1. | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
|------- | -----------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 2. | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
|------- | ---------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 3. | Key Information
|------- | ---------------

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables present a summary of our consolidated financial information for each of the periods indicated. This information should be
read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements referred to in Item 18 hereof and included elsewhere in this document, including the notes thereto. Our audited
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB.

References in this annual report on Form 20-F to dollars, U.S. dollars or U.S.$ are to the lawful currency
of the United States of America. References in this annual report on Form 20-F to pesos, Mexican pesos or Ps. are to the lawful currency of Mexico. We publish our audited consolidated financial statements in
Mexican pesos.

This annual report on Form 20-F contains translations of certain peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely
for the convenience of the reader. These translations should not be construed as representations that the peso amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise
indicated, U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from Mexican pesos at an exchange rate of Ps. 13.098 to U.S.$ 1.00, the noon buying rate for pesos on December 31, 2013, as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. On April 11,
2014 the exchange rate for pesos as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board was Ps. 13.0740 to U.S.$ 1.00.

This
annual report on Form 20-F contains references to workload units, which are units measuring an airports passenger traffic volume and cargo volume. A workload unit currently is equivalent to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms
(220 pounds) of cargo. When we refer to terminal passengers we mean the sum of all arriving and departing passengers on commercial and general aviation flights, other than transit passengers. Transit passengers
are those who are generally not required to change aircraft while on a multiple-stop itinerary and who generally do not disembark from their aircraft to enter the terminal building. When we refer to total passengers, we mean the sum of
terminal passengers and transit passengers. When we refer to commercial aviation passengers, we mean the sum of terminal and transit passengers, excluding general aviation passengers, such as those on private, non-commercial aircraft.
Country-wide data for Mexico presented herein are based on commercial aviation passengers, but we generally measure our operations based on terminal passengers.

This annual report on Form 20-F contains references to air traffic movements, which represent the sum of all aircraft arrivals and
departures of any kind at an airport.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

International Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee 12 (IFRIC 12) Service Concession
Arrangements arose from the need to provide clarification on the accounting treatment to be followed for service concession contracts for services that are considered public in nature.

IFRIC 12 requires, subject to certain conditions, that the infrastructure of a service concession contract falling within its scope not be
recognized as property, plant and equipment. It also requires that revenues obtained when the operator performs both construction or upgrade services and operating services under a single contract be recognized according to each type of service
provided, based on the fair value of consideration received at the time the service is rendered. We recognize revenues and the associated costs of improvements to concession assets that we are obligated to perform at the airports as established by
our Master Development Programs. The amount of revenues for these services are equal to the amount of costs incurred, as we do not obtain any profit margin for these construction services. The amounts paid are set at market value. As a result,
revenues from improvements to concession assets do not have a cash impact on our results and do not represent a cash inflow. Furthermore, they are not directly related to our passenger traffic, which is the main driver of our revenues.

In reviewing this annual report, you should take into account the fact that certain margin and ratio calculations that utilize Total
revenues or Total operating costs will reflect the effects of IFRIC 12. Consequently, changes in total revenues, total operating costs, EBITDA margin, operating margin, total revenues per terminal passenger and other ratios
included in this annual report, as well as other ratios potentially useful to investors, may not be comparable between periods. In those instances we have included a parenthetical notation with comparable amounts or measures. Nominal results for
amounts used in calculating certain margins, such as operating income, are not affected by the adoption of IFRIC 12 and are therefore comparable.

Furthermore, in several sections of this annual report we take into account only revenues that resulted in actual cash inflows (which we
categorize as aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, or the sum of the two) for ratios or comparative calculations. Both of these categories of revenues are dependent, either directly or indirectly, on passenger traffic, while revenues
generated from improvements to concession assets under IFRIC 12 are not dependent upon passenger traffic, but rather stem from the level of capital expenditures carried out at each airport. Information reported using only revenues that generated
cash inflows may be more useful for readers of this annual report because those revenues stem from the key drivers of our business, passenger traffic, and our maximum tariffs. The use of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues is more common in
our industry as they represent the revenues generated from our core operations, that being services provided to passengers, airlines, and other third parties based on passenger traffic at our airports. We indicate each instance in which we use only
aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues by indicating the category of revenues used.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

The summary financial and other information set forth below reflects our financial condition,
results of operations and certain operating data according to IFRS for the periods indicated. The selected financial information for 2011 differs from the information we previously published in our annual report for 2011, because it is presented in
accordance with IFRS.



|                                                                  |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ---------- | - | ------------------------ | --- | ---------- | ---- |  | --- | ---------- | - |  | ----- | --------- | -
|                                                                  |  | Year ended December 31, |           
|                                                                  |  | 2011                    |            |   | 2012                     |     |            | 2013 |  |     | 2013       |  
|                                                                  |  | (thousands of pesos)    |            |   | (thousands ofdollars)(1) |    
|Profit or loss and other comprehensive income data:               |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Revenues:                                                         |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Aeronautical services(2)                                          |  | Ps.                     | 3,077,927  |   |                          | Ps. | 3,365,982  |      |  | Ps. | 3,616,616  |   |  | U.S.$ | 276,120   |  
|Non-aeronautical services(3)                                      |  |                         | 824,580    |   |                          |     | 1,008,452  |      |  |     | 1,170,492  |   |  |       | 89,364    |  
|Improvements to concession assets(4)                              |  |                         | 1,036,227  |   |                          |     | 570,233    |      |  |     | 440,728    |   |  |       | 33,649    |  
|Total revenues                                                    |  |                         | 4,938,734  |   |                          |     | 4,944,667  |      |  |     | 5,227,836  |   |  |       | 399,133   |  
|Operating costs:                                                  |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Costs of services:                                                |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Employee costs                                                    |  |                         | 369,386    |   |                          |     | 402,607    |      |  |     | 390,606    |   |  |       | 29,822    |  
|Maintenance                                                       |  |                         | 179,455    |   |                          |     | 200,022    |      |  |     | 200,224    |   |  |       | 15,287    |  
|Safety, security & insurance                                      |  |                         | 131,168    |   |                          |     | 159,379    |      |  |     | 173,748    |   |  |       | 13,265    |  
|Utilities                                                         |  |                         | 122,095    |   |                          |     | 139,479    |      |  |     | 141,855    |   |  |       | 10,830    |  
|Other                                                             |  |                         | 184,834    |   |                          |     | 158,515    |      |  |     | 222,518    |   |  |       | 16,989    |  
|Total costs of services                                           |  |                         | 986,938    |   |                          |     | 1,060,002  |      |  |     | 1,128,951  |   |  |       | 86,193    |  
|Technical assistance fees(5)                                      |  |                         | 136,191    |   |                          |     | 155,072    |      |  |     | 171,470    |   |  |       | 13,091    |  
|Concession taxes(6)                                               |  |                         | 193,802    |   |                          |     | 217,295    |      |  |     | 237,728    |   |  |       | 18,150    |  
|Depreciation and amortization:                                    |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Depreciation(7)                                                   |  |                         | 110,314    |   |                          |     | 151,176    |      |  |     | 164,606    |   |  |       | 12,567    |  
|Amortization(8)                                                   |  |                         | 632,655    |   |                          |     | 676,054    |      |  |     | 718,629    |   |  |       | 54,866    |  
|Total depreciation and amortization                               |  |                         | 742,969    |   |                          |     | 827,230    |      |  |     | 883,235    |   |  |       | 67,433    |  
|Other expense (income)                                            |  |                         | 6,587      |   |                          |     | 1,333      |      |  |     | (7,453     | ) |  |       | (569      | )
|Cost of improvements to concession assets(4)                      |  |                         | 1,036,227  |   |                          |     | 570,233    |      |  |     | 440,728    |   |  |       | 33,649    |  
|Total operating costs                                             |  |                         | 3,102,714  |   |                          |     | 2,831,165  |      |  |     | 2,854,659  |   |  |       | 217,947   |  
|Income from operations                                            |  |                         | 1,836,020  |   |                          |     | 2,113,502  |      |  |     | 2,373,177  |   |  |       | 181,186   |  
|Finance income (cost)                                             |  |                         | 37,318     |   |                          |     | (14,023    | )    |  |     | (51,159    | ) |  |       | (3,906    | )
|Income before income taxes                                        |  |                         | 1,873,338  |   |                          |     | 2,099,479  |      |  |     | 2,322,018  |   |  |       | 177,280   |  
|Income tax expense                                                |  |                         | 261,758    |   |                          |     | 327,449    |      |  |     | 75,788     |   |  |       | 5,786     |  
|Consolidated net income                                           |  |                         | 1,611,580  |   |                          |     | 1,772,030  |      |  |     | 2,246,230  |   |  |       | 171,494   |  
|Basic and diluted earnings per share(9)                           |  | Ps.                     | 2.9969     |   |                          | Ps. | 3.3389     |      |  | Ps. | 4.2377     |   |  | U.S.$ | 0.3235    |  
|Basic and diluted earnings per ADS(9)                             |  | Ps.                     | 29.9687    |   |                          | Ps. | 33.3891    |      |  | Ps. | 42.3768    |   |  | U.S.$ | 3.2354    |  
|Dividends per share(10)                                           |  | Ps.                     | 1.9231     |   |                          | Ps. | 2.1292     |      |  | Ps. | 2.2837     |   |  | U.S.$ | 0.1744    |  
|Dividends per ADS(10)                                             |  | Ps.                     | 19.2310    |   |                          | Ps. | 21.2918    |      |  | Ps. | 22.8375    |   |  | U.S.$ | 1.7436    |  
|Other operating data:                                             |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Total terminal passengers (thousands of passengers)(11)           |  |                         | 20,208     |   |                          |     | 21,287     |      |  |     | 23,173     |   |  |       | 23,173    |  
|Total air traffic movements (thousands of movements)              |  |                         | 395        |   |                          |     | 395        |      |  |     | 404        |   |  |       | 404       |  
|Total revenues per terminal passenger(12)                         |  | Ps.                     | 244        |   |                          | Ps. | 232        |      |  | Ps. | 226        |   |  | U.S.$ | 17        |  
|Aeronautical and non-aeronautical services
per terminal passenger |  | Ps.                     | 193        |   |                          | Ps. | 205        |      |  | Ps. | 207        |   |  | U.S.$ | 16        |  
|Statement of financial position:                                  |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                         |  | Ps.                     | 2,135,010  |   |                          | Ps. | 1,663,683  |      |  | Ps. | 2,168,187  |   |  | U.S.$ | 165,536   |  
|Total current assets                                              |  |                         | 2,885,072  |   |                          |     | 2,459,168  |      |  |     | 2,872,087  |   |  |       | 219,277   |  
|Airport concessions, net                                          |  |                         | 10,463,499 |   |                          |     | 10,179,422 |      |  |     | 9,895,346  |   |  |       | 755,485   |  
|Rights to use airport facilities, net                             |  |                         | 1,327,189  |   |                          |     | 1,270,490  |      |  |     | 1,213,792  |   |  |       | 92,670    |  
|Total assets                                                      |  |                         | 24,719,675 |   |                          |     | 24,533,637 |      |  |     | 25,234,600 |   |  |       | 1,926,600 |  
|Current liabilities                                               |  |                         | 1,062,027  |   |                          |     | 1,132,711  |      |  |     | 1,212,154  |   |  |       | 92,545    |  
|Total liabilities                                                 |  |                         | 3,038,492  |   |                          |     | 3,080,424  |      |  |     | 3,021,889  |   |  |       | 230,714   |  
|Total shareholders equity                                        |  |                         | 21,681,183 |   |                          |     | 21,453,213 |      |  |     | 22,212,711 |   |  |       | 1,695,886 |  
|Other data:                                                       |  |                         |            |   |                          |     |            |      |  |     |            |   |  |       |           |  
|Net cash flows provided by operating activities                   |  | Ps.                     | 2,256,718  |   |                          | Ps. | 2,661,274  |      |  | Ps. | 2,964,713  |   |  | U.S.$ | 226,349   |  
|Net cash flows used in investing activities                       |  |                         | (1,253,470 | ) |                          |     | (983,785   | )    |  |     | (680,951   | ) |  |       | (51,989   | )
|Net cash flows used in financing activities                       |  |                         | (1,217,045 | ) |                          |     | (2,148,816 | )    |  |     | (1,779,258 | ) |  |       | (135,842  | )
|(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents                  |  |                         | (213,797   | ) |                          |     | (471,327   | )    |  |     | 504,504    |   |  |       | 38,518    |  



4



---

##### Table of Contents



|1. | Translated into dollars at the rate of Ps.13.098 per U.S.$ 1.00, the noon buying rate on December 31, 2013, as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. The U.S. dollar information should not be construed to
imply that the peso amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at such rate or at any other rate. Per-share dollar amounts are expressed in dollars (not thousands of dollars). Operating data are expressed in the
units indicated.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | Revenues from aeronautical services principally consist of a fee for each departing passenger except diplomats, infants and transit and transfer passengers if the transfer of the passenger occurs within 24 hours of the
passengers arrival at the airport, aircraft landing fees, aircraft parking fees, fees for the transport of passengers from an aircraft to a terminal building, security charges for each departing passenger and other sources of revenues subject
to regulation under our maximum rates. See Item 4, Information on the Company  Regulatory Framework herein for a description of our regulatory framework, including our maximum rates.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. | Revenues from non-aeronautical services consist of revenues not subject to regulation under our maximum rates, which are primarily revenues from leasing of commercial space to tenants, advertisers, certain ground
transportation providers and other miscellaneous sources of revenues, as well as the revenues derived from business lines operated directly by us, which include car parking charges, advertising, VIP lounges and convenience stores. Pursuant to our
operating concessions and the Mexican Airport Law (Ley de Aeropuertos) and the regulations thereunder, car parking services are currently regulated under the Mexican Airport Law but are excluded from regulated services under our maximum
rates, although the Ministry of Communications and Transportation (Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes) could decide to regulate such rates.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4. | Revenues from improvements to concession assets represent revenues generated from improvements made to concession assets and the related costs stemming from capital expenditures made as agreed with the Mexican
government under our Master Development Programs for 2011, 2012 and 2013. These amounts did not result in actual cash inflows, nor did they have an effect on our consolidated net income in 2011, 2012 and 2013 as revenues earned were equal to the
costs incurred. See Item 4, Information on the Company  Business Overview.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|5. | We pay Aeropuertos Mexicanos del Pacífico, S.A.P.I. de C.V., or AMP, a technical assistance fee under the technical assistance agreement entered into in connection with AMPs purchase of our
Series BB shares. This fee is described in Item 7 hereof.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|6. | Each of our subsidiary concession holders is required to pay a concession tax to the Mexican government under the Mexican Federal Duties Law (Ley Federal de Derechos) for the use of public domain assets pursuant
to the terms of its concession. The concession tax is currently 5% of each concession holders gross annual revenues (excluding revenues from improvements to concession assets).
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|7. | Reflects depreciation of machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|8. | Reflects amortization of concessions, improvements to concession assets, rights to use airport facilities, recovered long-term leases and parking lots.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|9. | Based on a weighted average of 537,755,093, 530,720,600 and 530,061,831 common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, due to our stock repurchase program. Earnings
per ADS are based on the ratio of 10 Series B shares per ADS.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|10. | Dollar amounts per share were U.S.$ 0.1378 in 2011, U.S.$ 0.1642 in 2012 and U.S.$ 0.1744 in 2013, and per ADS were U.S.$ 1.3785 in 2011, U.S.$ 1.6424 in 2012 and U.S.$ 1.7436 in 2013. Per-share dollar amounts are
expressed in dollars (not thousands of dollars).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|11. | Includes arriving and departing passengers as well as transfer passengers (passengers who arrive at our airports on one aircraft and depart on a different aircraft). Excludes transit passengers (passengers who arrive at
our airports but generally depart without changing aircraft).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|12. | Total revenues for the period divided by terminal passengers for the period, expressed in pesos (not thousands of pesos).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



5



---

##### Table of Contents

EXCHANGE RATES

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end exchange rate expressed in pesos per U.S.
dollar. The average annual rates presented in the following table were calculated using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the relevant period. The data provided in this table is based on the rates published by
the U.S. Federal Reserve Board in its H.10 Weekly Release of Foreign Exchange Rates. All amounts are stated in pesos and have not been restated in constant currency units. We make no representation that the Mexican peso amounts referred to in this
annual report could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at any particular rate or at all.



|                        |  |               |       |  |     |  |       |            |  |  |            |  |  |  |       | 
|----------------------- |  | ------------- | ----- |  | --- |  | ----- | ---------- |  |  | ---------- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                        |  | Exchange Rate |      
|Year ended December 31, |  | High          |       |  | Low |  |       | Period End |  |  | Average(1) | 
|2011                    |  |               | 14.25 |  |     |  | 11.50 |            |  |  | 13.95      |  |  |  | 12.43 | 
|2012                    |  |               | 14.37 |  |     |  | 12.63 |            |  |  | 12.96      |  |  |  | 13.15 | 
|2013                    |  |               | 13.43 |  |     |  | 11.98 |            |  |  | 13.10      |  |  |  | 12.76 | 
|November 2013           |  |               | 13.24 |  |     |  | 12.87 |            |  |  | 13.11      |  |  |  | 13.06 | 
|December 2013           |  |               | 13.22 |  |     |  | 12.85 |            |  |  | 13.10      |  |  |  | 13.01 | 
|2014:                   |  |               |       |  |     |  |       |            |  |  |            |  |  |  |       | 
|January 2014            |  |               | 13.46 |  |     |  | 13.00 |            |  |  | 13.36      |  |  |  | 13.22 | 
|February 2014           |  |               | 13.51 |  |     |  | 13.20 |            |  |  | 13.23      |  |  |  | 13.29 | 
|March 2014              |  |               | 13.33 |  |     |  | 13.06 |            |  |  | 13.06      |  |  |  | 13.19 | 
|April 2014(2)           |  |               | 13.13 |  |     |  | 12.95 |            |  |  | 13.07      |  |  |  | 13.05 | 



Sources:
U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

|(1) | Average of month-end rates or daily rates, as applicable.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Through April 11, 2014.
|--- | -----------------------

On April 11, 2014, the exchange rate for pesos was
Ps. 13.0740 per U.S.$ 1.00 as published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and
the U.S. dollar affect the U.S. dollar value of securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange (Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., or BMV), and, as a result, will likely affect the market price of our American Depositary
Shares, or ADSs. Such fluctuations may also affect the U.S. dollar conversion by The Bank of New York Mellon, the depositary for our ADSs, of any cash dividends paid in pesos.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Operations

Our revenues are highly dependent on levels of passenger and cargo traffic volumes and air traffic, which depend in part on factors beyond our control.

Our revenues are closely linked to passenger and cargo traffic volumes and the number of air traffic movements at our airports.
These factors directly determine our revenues from aeronautical services and indirectly determine our revenues from non-aeronautical services. Our principal source of aeronautical service revenues is passenger charges. Passenger charges are payable
for each passenger (other than diplomats, infants and transit and transfer passengers, if the transfer of the passenger occurs within 24 hours of the passengers arrival at the airport) departing from the airport terminals we operate and are
collected by the airlines and paid to us. In 2011, 2012 and 2013 passenger charges represented 51.8%, 57.1% and 58.8%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, passenger charges represented 65.5%, 64.5% and 64.2%, respectively,
of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Passenger and cargo traffic volumes and air traffic movements depend in
part on many factors beyond our control, including economic conditions in Mexico and the United States, the political situation in Mexico and elsewhere in the world, public health crises, the attractiveness of the destinations that our airports
serve relative to those of other competing airports, fluctuations in petroleum prices, disruptions of global debt markets and changes in regulatory policies applicable to the aviation industry. Any decreases in air traffic to or from our airports as
a result of factors such as these could adversely affect our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition.

A global economic
and financial crisis may affect our business.

The global economic and financial crisis that began in 2007 and continued through
2009, led to high volatility and lack of liquidity in the global credit and other financial markets. The downturn in the U.S. and global economies led to increased commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, decreased market
valuations, increased market volatility, high financial risk premiums and a widespread reduction of business activity generally. These conditions also limited the availability of credit and increased financial costs for companies around the world,
including companies in Mexico and the United States. Although economic conditions improved starting in 2010 and the availability of credit has increased while interest rates remained stable, another recession could significantly affect our ability
to access credit to finance our future projects, therefore adversely affecting our business.

Negative economic developments in Mexico could reduce
domestic passenger traffic at our airports, which would adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Although a
substantial portion of our revenues is derived from foreign tourism, Mexican domestic passengers in recent years have represented approximately two-thirds of the passenger traffic volume at our airports. In addition, all of our assets are located,
and all of our operations are conducted, in Mexico. Because our revenues are largely dependent on the level of passenger traffic at our airports, any decline in domestic traffic could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations,
prospects and financial conditions. Therefore, if inflation or interest rates increase significantly or the Mexican economy is otherwise adversely impacted, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected because, among other things, domestic demand for transportation services may decrease. For more information on the potential impact of negative economic developments in Mexico, see  Risks Related to Mexico 
Adverse economic conditions in Mexico may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations in this section.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Our business is particularly sensitive to economic conditions and other developments in the United States.

Our business is particularly sensitive to trends in the United States relating to leisure travel, consumer spending and
international tourism. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, 88.5%, 88.0% and 89.7%, respectively, of the international terminal passengers served by our airports arrived and departed on flights originating in or departing to the United States.

Thus, our business is highly dependent on the condition of the U.S. economy, and events affecting the U.S. economy may adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition. In 2011, the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) increased at an annualized rate of 1.7%. In 2012 and 2013, the U.S. GDP grew 2.2% and 1.9%, respectively. Therefore, although the
U.S. economy has grown every year since the economic crisis that lasted from the end of 2007 until the middle of 2009, if the U.S. economy falls back into a recession, it would likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations due
to decreased passenger traffic travel to and from the United States.

Other trends and developments in the United States may also
adversely impact the frequency and pattern of our international passenger traffic. For example, any development that could make travel to and from the United States less attractive to our passengers, including legislative developments related to
immigration policy in the United States, could negatively affect the level of passenger traffic in our airports, which may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Levels of passenger and cargo traffic volumes and air traffic at our airports are highly sensitive to the impact on airlines of international petroleum
prices and access to credit.

Our revenues are closely linked to passenger and cargo traffic volumes and air traffic movements at
our airports, which are determined by the operating levels of airlines at our airports. Airlines costs are highly sensitive to the price of petroleum and their access to credit to finance their operations. Increased costs may increase ticket
prices and reduce fleets, thereby decreasing flight frequencies and negatively impacting passenger and cargo traffic volumes.

International petroleum prices have experienced significant volatility in the recent past, reaching record highs in the third quarter of 2008.
Although prices have remained below the highs of 2008, the price of fuel may be subject to further fluctuations resulting from a reduction or increase in output of petroleum, voluntary or otherwise, by oil-producing countries, other market forces, a
general increase in international hostilities, or any future terrorist attacks. Increases in airlines costs as a result of higher petroleum prices may lead to airline bankruptcies, higher ticket prices, cancellations of routes and decreases in
frequencies of flights, and may decrease demand for air travel generally, which may reduce passenger and cargo traffic at our airports.

Most airlines also depend on reliable access to credit at interest rates they can afford to finance their fleet of aircraft and make other
large investments. As evidenced by the recent global recession and financial crisis, high interest rates and disruptions in the global debt markets had an adverse effect on airlines ability to operate their fleets, forcing many to raise ticket
prices, cancel routes, decrease the frequencies of flights or forego scheduled investments. Such reductions in operations by airlines led to lower passenger and cargo traffic volumes at our airports, which has had an adverse impact on our results of
operations.

See The loss of or suspension of operations by one or more of our key customers could result in a loss of a
significant amount of our revenues in this section for a more detailed description of which of our major airline customers have recently reduced or cancelled operations at our airports.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Our business is highly dependent upon revenues from four of our airports and could be adversely impacted by
any condition affecting those airports.

In 2013, approximately 82.4% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues was
generated from four of our 12 airports. The following table lists the percentage of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated at our airports in 2013:



|                                      |  |                                 |       |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ----- | -
|Airport                               |  | For year endedDecember 31, 2013 |      
|Guadalajara International Airport     |  |                                 | 35.4  | %
|Los Cabos International Airport       |  |                                 | 19.6  | %
|Tijuana International Airport         |  |                                 | 14.3  | %
|Puerto Vallarta International Airport |  |                                 | 13.1  | %
|Eight other airports                  |  |                                 | 17.6  | %
|                                      |  |                                 |       |  
|Total                                 |  |                                 | 100.0 | %
|                                      |  |                                 |       |  

As a result of the substantial contribution to our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues from these four
airports, any event or condition affecting these airports could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition.

Competition from other tourist destinations could adversely affect our business.

The principal factor affecting our results of operations and business is the number of passengers using our airports. The number of passengers
using our airports (particularly our Los Cabos International Airport and our Puerto Vallarta International Airport) may vary as a result of factors beyond our control, including the level of tourism in Mexico. In addition, our passenger traffic
volume may be adversely affected by the attractiveness, affordability and accessibility of competing tourist destinations in Mexico, such as Acapulco and Cancun, or elsewhere, such as Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Florida, Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican
Republic and other Caribbean islands and destinations in Central America. The attractiveness of the destinations we serve is also likely to be affected by perceptions of travelers as to the safety and political and social stability of Mexico,
particularly as a result of the uncertainty and safety concerns resulting from the governments ongoing effort against drug cartels. There can be no assurance that tourism levels, and therefore the number of passengers using our airports, in
the future will match or exceed current levels. A reduction in tourism to the destinations served by our airports could directly and indirectly affect our revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services.

International events, including acts of terrorism, wars and global epidemics, could have a negative impact on international air travel.

International events such as the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, wars such as the one in Iraq and public
health crises such as the Influenza A/H1N1 epidemic have negatively affected the frequency and pattern of air travel worldwide in recent years.

The terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001 had a severe adverse impact on the air travel industry, particularly on
U.S. carriers and on carriers operating international service to and from the United States. Airline traffic in the United States fell precipitously after the attacks. Our terminal passenger volumes declined 1.4% in 2001 and an additional 5.3% in
2002 (in each case as compared to the prior year). Any future terrorist attacks, whether or not involving aircraft, will likely adversely affect our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition. Moreover, we cannot predict what
effect any future terrorist attacks or threatened attacks on the United States or any retaliatory measures taken by the United States in response to these events may have on the U.S. economy or leisure travel trends, which may negatively affect our
results of operations.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

In April 2009, Mexico, as well as several other countries, was affected by an outbreak of
Influenza A/H1N1. As a result of the outbreak, a number of countries, including the United States, Great Britain and France, advised against nonessential travel to Mexico, although these advisories had been lifted by the end of May 2009. While we
cannot completely isolate the impact on travel of the advisories and restrictions imposed by national and international governments from other potential factors such as the economy, our domestic passenger traffic and international passenger traffic
declined by 33.3% and 43.7%, respectively, during May 2009 (in each case compared to May 2008). A new outbreak could once again disrupt our operations and significantly affect passenger and cargo traffic levels.

Because our revenues are largely dependent on the level of passenger traffic in our airports, any general increase of hostilities relating to
reprisals against terrorist organizations, further armed conflict around the world, outbreaks of health epidemics or other events of general international concern (and any related economic impact of such events) could result in decreased passenger
traffic and increased costs to the air travel industry and, as a result, could cause a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition.

Security enhancements and requirements may require additional investments or result in additional expenses.

The air travel business is susceptible to, and has experienced, increased costs resulting from enhanced security and higher insurance.
Following the events of September 11, 2001, we reinforced security at our airports, and our general liability insurance premiums increased substantially. Since August 1, 2003, we have carried a Ps. 500 million insurance policy
covering damages to our property resulting from terrorist acts. We carry a U.S.$150 million insurance policy covering personal and property damages to third parties resulting from terrorist acts. Because our insurance policies do not cover all
losses and liabilities resulting from war or terrorism, we could incur significant costs if we were to be directly affected by events of this nature. Any such increase in our operating costs would have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The users of airports, principally airlines, also have been subject to increased costs following the events of September 11, 2001.
Airlines have been required to adopt additional security measures and may be required to comply with more rigorous security rules or guidelines in the future. Premiums for aviation insurance increased substantially in the years following 2001 and
could rise further in the future. While governments in other countries have agreed to indemnify airlines for liabilities they might incur resulting from terrorist attacks, the Mexican government has not done so and has given no indication of any
intention to do the same. In addition, fuel prices, supplies and interest rates for airlines aircraft lease agreements, which constitute a significant cost for airlines using our airports, may be subject to increases resulting from any future
terrorist attacks, a general increase in international hostilities or a reduction in output of fuel, voluntary or otherwise, by oil producing countries. Such increases in airlines costs have resulted in higher airline ticket prices and
decreased demand for air travel generally, thereby having an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations. In addition, because a substantial majority of our international flights involve travel to the United States, we may be required
to comply with security directives of the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority, in addition to the directives of Mexican aviation authorities.

If authorities require security enhancements or require us to adopt additional security measures, we may be required to undertake significant
additional expenses and capital expenditures, and we cannot guarantee that those expenses and/or capital expenditures will be taken in to account in our Maximum Tariff and Master Development Programs negotiations. Therefore, these additional
expenses could negatively affect our cash flows and affect our results of operations.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

The operation of new baggage screening equipment could increase our expenses and may expose us to greater
liability.

In 2005, the Mexican government issued a policy letter (carta de política) calling for all checked
baggage on all commercial flights to undergo a new comprehensive screening process. The new screening process required the installation of dedicated screening equipment and the manual inspection of baggage if such equipment signals the potential
presence of prohibited items. Because of uncertainty over the policy letters implementation, the new screening process was initially delayed. Although the Mexican Airport Law expressly provides that airlines bear the responsibility for baggage
screening, the fact that the policy letter is silent as to responsibility caused some of our airline customers to contend that the policy letters intent is for airport concessionaires, such as us, to bear responsibility for the new screening
process. In addition, certain questions have been raised regarding the constitutionality of the new screening process. Since the issuance of the policy letter, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation has been expected to issue implementing regulations.
On November 23, 2012, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation (Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil, or DGAC) published a recommendation, titled a Circular Obligatoria, on the Ministry
of Communications and Transportation website that, instead of modifying the legal responsibilities set forth in the Mexican Airport Law, attempted to facilitate contracts between parties through certain recommendations regarding issues of
responsibility that have been raised. These recommendations are not binding and would have no legal effect unless incorporated into a valid contract.

The checked baggage screening equipment has been operational in our 10 busiest airports since 2011; only the Aguascalientes and Los Mochis
airports continue to perform manual inspection. As of December 31, 2013, we had signed agreements to operate the baggage screening equipment with all of our airline customers with a significant volume of traffic, except Viva Aerobus, Copa and
AirCanada. As a result, as of the end of 2013, approximately 90% of the passengers travelling through our airports were using the baggage screening system, compared to approximately 30% at the end of 2012.

We are incurring ongoing expenses to maintain and operate this equipment. Currently, the operational costs of the screening system have been
limited to the level necessary to provide the required services to airlines, and we expect to continue recovering those costs, which could increase if more airlines sign a contract to use our equipment. We also expect to incur ongoing expenses to
maintain any equipment purchased, and we could be required to undertake significant additional capital expenditures for items such as a new screening technology or additional equipment if screening guidelines are expanded further and require that
additional steps be taken to comply with the requirements. These additional expenses could restrict our liquidity and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, if it is determined that we are responsible for all or a portion of the
cost or that we are liable for certain issues arising from our operation of the screening systems, our exposure to liability could increase significantly. These operational costs will be reviewed during our negotiation of the Master Development
Programs for the years 2015-2019, which will take place during 2014. For more information on screening equipment, see Item 4, Regulatory Framework  Scope of Concessions.

Our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected if we fail in our business strategy.

Our ability to increase our revenues and profitability depends in part on our business strategy, which consists of setting prices as close as
possible to our regulatory maximum rates for any given year, reducing operating costs, controlling our capital expenditure commitments under our Master Development Programs with the Mexican government, increasing passenger and cargo traffic at our
airports and increasing revenues from commercial activities.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Our ability to increase our commercial revenues is significantly dependent, among other factors,
upon increasing passenger traffic at our airports and on our ability to renegotiate rental agreements with our tenants to provide for contractual terms more favorable to us and for the ability for us to directly operate business lines. In addition,
our ability to increase revenues from commercial activities depends on our ability to continue the remodeling, expansion and modernization of the commercial areas we operate within our airports and on the introduction of new business lines. Further,
we are in the process of expanding the amount and types of business lines that we operate directly within our airports. Revenues from business lines operated directly by us represented 6.7% of total revenues during 2013, as compared with 5.7% of
total revenues during 2012 (7.3% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated in our airports in 2013, as compared to 6.4% in 2012).

We cannot provide assurance that we will be successful in implementing our strategy of increasing our passenger traffic or our revenues from
commercial activities, including commercial activities that we operate directly. The passenger traffic volume in our airports depends on factors beyond our control, such as the attractiveness of the commercial, industrial and tourist centers that
the airports serve. Additionally, our new commercial strategy of increasing revenues by operating lines of businesses in our airports directly could result in the loss of a significant amount of revenues, or not generate the level of profitability
sufficient to increase our results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the passenger traffic volume in our airports will increase or that our profitability will increase.

If a change in relations with our labor force should occur, such a change could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

Although we currently believe we maintain good relations with our labor force, if any conflicts with our employees were to arise in the
future, including with our unionized employees (which accounted for approximately 50% of our total employees as of December 31, 2013), resulting events such as strikes or other disruptions that could arise with respect to our workforce could
have a negative impact on our results of operations.

The loss of or suspension of operations by one or more of our key customers could result in a
loss of a significant amount of our revenues.

A majority of our revenues are driven by the operations of a few key customer
airlines. Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A. de C.V., or Volaris; Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V., or Grupo Aeroméxico, a holding company that owns Aeroméxico and Aeroméxico Connect; and
ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V., or Interjet, accountedexcluding revenues from passenger chargesfor 1.2%, 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively, of total revenues in our airports in 2013 (1.3%, 0.4% and 0.1%, respectively, of the sum of
aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated in our airports in 2013). However, these airlines transport a significant amount of our passenger traffic; during 2013, the passenger charges collected by these three airlines accounted for 20.4%,
10.9% and 5.6%, respectively, of total revenues in our airports (22.3%, 12.0% and 6.1%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated in our airports in 2013).

None of our contracts with our airline customers obligate them to continue providing service to our airports, and we can offer no assurance
that, if any of our key customers reduce their use of our airports, competing airlines would add flights to their schedules to replace any flights no longer handled by our principal airline customers.

For example, on August 2, 2010, Mexicana de Aviación, S.A. de C.V. (Mexicana), one of Mexicos two largest
carriers and previously an airline which was among our three largest customers in terms of passenger traffic, filed for bankruptcy protection in Mexico and in the United States. On August



12



---

##### Table of Contents

28, 2010, Mexicana, Mexicana Click (formerly known as Aerovías Caribe) and Mexicana Link (formerly known as Mexicana (Inter) (collectively Grupo Mexicana) ceased operations.
Mexicana Click and Mexicana Link filed for bankruptcy protection on September 7, 2010. In 2010, Grupo Mexicana was still our third largest carrier and accounted for 8.9% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated in our
airports. It was not until 2012 that all seats previously flown by Grupo Mexicana were taken over by other airlines. We can offer no assurance that competing airlines would seek to increase their flight schedules if any of our key customers reduced
their use of our airports. In addition, Mexican law prohibits an international airline from transporting passengers from one Mexican location to another, except if the passenger originated travel outside Mexico, thus limiting the number of airlines
providing domestic service in Mexico. Accordingly, we expect to continue to generate a significant portion of our revenues from domestic travel from a limited number of airlines.

Additionally, on November 29, 2011, AMR Corporation (AMR), parent of American Airlines Inc. (American) and AMR
Eagle Holding Company (American Eagle), filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 reorganization in a U.S. bankruptcy court. The Chapter 11 process permitted American and American Eagle to continue operating flights normally during the
reorganization. To date, AMR Corporation, through its two subsidiaries American and American Eagle, operates at 7 of our 12 airports (Aguascalientes, Guanajuato, Guadalajara, Hermosillo, Morelia, Puerto Vallarta and Los Cabos). From January to
December 2013, AMR Corporation, through its subsidiaries, transported 899,116 passengers at our airports, which represents 3.9% of our passenger traffic in 2013. During the Chapter 11 process, neither American nor American Eagle has suspended
payments for the services provided by us. Although as of December 31, 2013, the current balance of payments owed to us by AMR Corporation was Ps. 9.4 million, the amount of the bond granted to us by AMR Corporation as a guarantee of such
payments was Ps. 41.0 million as of December 31, 2013. On December 9, 2013, AMR Corporation emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection upon the conjunction of AMR Corporations Plan of Reorganization and merged
with U.S. Airways. Upon closing of the merger, AMR Corporation was renewed American Airlines Group, Inc.

Furthermore, passenger charges,
which accounted for 58.8% of our revenues in 2013 (64.2% taking into account only the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues), are collected by airlines from passengers on our behalf and are later paid to us, depending on the airline,
within no more than 60 days following the date of each flight. During 2013, the average collection term of passenger charges was 59 days. If any of our key airline customers were to become insolvent or seek bankruptcy protection, we would be an
unsecured creditor with respect to any unpaid passenger charges, and we might not be able to recover the full amount of such charges.

During 2009, we renegotiated our passenger charges collection agreements with all of our airline customers. See Item 4, Business
Overview  Our Sources of Revenues  Aeronautical Services  Passenger Charges. According to the new agreements that took effect on November 1, 2009, an airline may obtain a grace period of up to a maximum of 60 days
for payment on a case by case basis (not all airlines received the same grace period). If an airline wants to obtain a grace period of any amount up to the 60-day limit, the airline is required to secure the grace period and the equivalent of 30
additional days with cash, bonds or other collateral equal to the charges the airline would incur during that period by taking into account the peak operational days for that specific airline during the previous 12-month period. Thus, in the event
of insolvency or suspension of operations by an airline, we are able to collect passenger charges invoiced to that airline up to the value of the collateral. Although we would also have a 30-day buffer beyond the grace period, our cash flows from
operations or our results of operations could be negatively affected if such collateral were not sufficient to cover the outstanding debt. Thus, in the event of any suspension of operations by an airline, such as in the case of Grupo Mexicana in
2010, or insolvency, we would not be assured of collecting 100% of the amounts invoiced to that airline for passenger charges, nor could we be assured that we would recover, in the short term, the traffic they would stop transporting, as a
consequence of an airlines ongoing bankruptcy process. Both scenarios could negatively affect our cash flows from operations or our results of operations.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Additionally, in previous years, some of our commercial clients have had difficulty making their
payments to our airports. As a result, we have tried to renegotiate terms with many clients to keep them at our airports. Despite our efforts, some clients have decided to leave our commercial spaces and cancel their contracts. This could
potentially have a negative effect on our revenues.

Our business is dependent on international regulations that affect Mexican airlines.

Airline regulations promulgated by international bodies or regulatory agencies in other countries could affect our operations and
potentially affect our revenues or results of operations. For instance, on July 30, 2010, the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced that, following an assessment of Mexicos civil aviation authority, it
had determined that Mexico was not in compliance with international safety standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and, as a result, downgraded Mexicos aviation safety rating from Category
1 to Category 2.

Under FAA regulations, because of this downgrade, Mexican airlines were not permitted to expand or
change their current operations between the United States and Mexico except under certain limited circumstances; code-sharing arrangements between Mexican and U.S. airlines were suspended; and operations by Mexican airlines flying to the United
States were subject to greater FAA oversight. These additional regulatory requirements resulted in reduced service between our airports and the United States by Mexican airlines, which resulted in a decrease in demand for travel between our airports
and the United States. Approximately 7.6% of the passengers that traveled through our airports traveled on flights to or from the United States operated by Mexican airlines in 2013.

The FAA restored Mexicos Category 1 rating on December 1, 2010. The FAA, however, may downgrade Mexicos air safety rating in
the future. We cannot predict what impact such a downgrade would have on our passenger traffic or results of operations, or on the public perception of the safety of Mexican airports.

The main domestic airlines operating at our airports have in the past refused to pay certain increases in our specific prices for aeronautical services
and could refuse to pay additional increases in the future.

In the past, certain of the domestic airlines operating at our
airports refused to pay certain increases in the specific prices we charge for aeronautical services.

Although these prior disputes were
resolved by 2006, because only a few airlines contribute a substantial portion of our revenues, our results of operations could be adversely impacted if any of these (or any of our other) airlines should refuse to make payments in the future.
Moreover, during periods of economic downturn, the airlines that operate at our airports may be more likely to oppose increases in our charges for aeronautical services in future years, which could adversely impact our results of operations. See
Item 4, Business Overview  Principal Customers  Principal Aeronautical Services Customers  Airline Customers.

The airlines at our airports may refuse to continue collecting passenger charges on our behalf or we may decide to collect passenger charges ourselves,
which would result in increased costs for us.

We collect a passenger charge for each departing passenger on an aircraft (other
than diplomats, infants and transfer and transit passengers, if the transfer of the passenger occurs within 24 hours of the passengers arrival at the airport). Currently, we have entered into collection agreements with the airlines that
operate at our airports to collect those passenger charges on our behalf. As a result, passenger charges are automatically included in the cost of passengers tickets, and we issue invoices for those charges to each airline. See Item 4,
Business Overview  Our Sources of Revenues  Aeronautical Services  Passenger Charges.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

We and the airlines with which we have these collection agreements have the right to cancel them
with prior notice to the other party. If we or one of our airline customers were to cancel a collection agreement, we would have to implement a collection system of our own to collect passenger charges from passengers directly. The installation and
operation of such a collection system would result in additional costs for us, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

The
operations of our airports may be disrupted due to the actions of third parties, which are beyond our control.

As is the case
with most airports, the operation of our airports is largely dependent on the services of third parties, such as air traffic control authorities, airlines and ground transportation providers. We also depend upon the Mexican government or entities of
the government for provision of services, such as electricity, supply of fuel for aircraft, air traffic control and immigration and customs services for our international passengers. Additionally, the disruption or stoppage of taxi or bus services
at one or more of our airports could also adversely affect our operations. We are not responsible for and cannot control the services provided by these parties. Any disruption in, or adverse consequence resulting from, their services, including a
work stoppage or other similar event, may have a material adverse effect on the operation of our airports and on our results of operations.

In addition, we are dependent on third-party providers of certain complementary services such as catering, baggage handling, and operation of
airbuses and passenger walkways. If these service providers were to halt operations at any of our airports, we would be required to seek a new service provider or provide services ourselves, either of which would likely result in increased capital
expenditures or costs and have an adverse impact on our cash generation and results of operations.

Actions by the former holders of land comprising
certain of our airports may disrupt the operations of these airports.

A portion of the lands comprising some of our
airports were expropriated by the Mexican government pursuant to its power of eminent domain. Prior to their expropriation, some of these lands had been held by groups of individuals through a system of communal ownership of rural land known as an
ejido. Certain of these former ejidos participants have asserted indemnity claims against the Mexican government challenging the expropriation decrees. See Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings 
Ejido Participants at Tijuana, Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta Airports.

Our concessions guarantee access to the land by
the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and any interruption caused to our operations by any of the ejidos is the responsibility of the Mexican Government. Although the Mexican Government must provide restitution for any economic
loss resulting from a disruption in access to our airports, there can be no assurance that the former ejido participants will not seek to disrupt the airports operations if their legal claims against the Mexican Government are not
resolved to their satisfaction. There also can be no assurance that the legal proceedings will be resolved in our favor, which may negatively impact our results of operations.

In addition to challenging the expropriation, certain of the former ejido participants are also currently occupying portions of the
Tijuana International Airport property. While these persons are not currently interfering with the airports operations, their presence could limit our ability to expand the airport into the areas they occupy. There can also be no assurance
that the former ejido participants will not seek to disrupt the airports operations if their legal claims against the Mexican government are not resolved to their satisfaction, which may negatively impact our results of operations.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

The actions of squatters on certain portions of the land on which our Guadalajara International Airport
operates could disrupt operations and security of the airport.

The Mexican government owns the land on which the Guadalajara
International Airport operates and has granted us the right to use that land for the purpose of operating the airport pursuant to our concession. Currently, there are squatters residing on or claiming rights to a portion of the property, at least
one of whom has attempted to subdivide and sell off certain portions of the property. As owner of the property, the Mexican government must initiate any actions directed at removing these persons from the property. We are reviewing the actions these
persons have taken and are cooperating with the Mexican government to ensure that the actions of these squatters do not adversely affect the operations of the Guadalajara International Airport. However, if the Mexican government or we are unable to
successfully remove these persons from the property, their presence could have an adverse impact on our operations and security at the airport and could restrict our ability to expand our operations at the airport.

We may be liable for property tax claims asserted against us by certain municipalities.

We remain subject to ongoing property tax claims that have been asserted against us by the municipal authorities of Mexicali, Tijuana,
Guadalajara, Hermosillo and Manzanillo for the payment of property taxes with respect to the property on which we operate our airports in those cities, and similar claims have been and may be asserted by other municipal authorities where we operate
our airports. We believe that under the law, the Mexican government, as the owner of the property upon which we operate our airports, would currently be responsible for paying these taxes directly if a court were to determine that these taxes must
be paid. See Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Property tax claims by certain municipalities for a full discussion of these property tax proceedings.

In addition, on May 28, 2010, the State Legislature of Jalisco sent to the Mexican Congress a legislative initiative in which they
requested that Congress consider changing the current Mexican Airport Law so that privately held airports operating on federal land would be subject to municipal taxes. As of the date of this report, this initiative remains under review by Congress.

If the Mexican government changes the current laws or if we do not prevail in the aforementioned proceedings, these tax liabilities could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business could be adversely affected by the penalty
imposed by the Mexican tax authority on some of our airports.

The Mexican tax authority (Servicio de Administración
Tributaria, or SAT), in connection with its review of the year 2005, sent us official notices in 2008 and 2009 stating that, under its criteria, the fiscal amortization rate used for each of the La Paz, Morelia and Los Mochis
airports concession values was incorrect. We initiated legal proceedings in a federal tax court to challenge SATs findings, based on our contention that SAT did not take into consideration all the relevant legal matters concerning our
position on amortization. See Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Federal tax proceedings against La Paz, Morelia and Los Mochis airports.

During 2013, several of these legal proceedings determined that our airports had applied an incorrect rate. Consequently, those airports were
required to modify their tax calculations as of 2005. These modified tax calculations, however, did not have a significant effect on our results of operations. However, the legal proceeding regarding the La Paz airport is still pending, and any
modification of tax calculations that may be required as a result could negatively affect our net income.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Our business could be adversely affected by other claims by certain municipalities

Certain of our airports are subject to claims by the municipality in which they operate regarding our failure to obtain certain municipal
licenses. Although we do not believe that we are subject to the license requirements at issue, If the municipalities require additional licenses or make changes to the current laws and we are unable to obtain the necessary licenses or if we do not
prevail in proceedings challenging these requirements, our failure to obtain these licenses could have a material adverse effect on the operations of certain of our airports and consequently on our financial condition and results of operations.

Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Business

We
provide a public service regulated by the Mexican government, and our flexibility in managing our aeronautical activities is limited by the regulatory environment in which we operate.

Our aeronautical fees charged to airlines and passengers are regulated, like those of most airports in other countries. In 2011, 2012 and 2013,
approximately 62.3%, 68.1%, and 69.2%, respectively, of our total revenues were earned from aeronautical services, which are subject to price regulation under our maximum rates (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, 78.9%, 76.9%, and 75.5%, respectively, of the
sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues were earned from aeronautical services). These regulations may limit our flexibility in operating our aeronautical activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, prospects and financial condition. In addition, several of the regulations applicable to our operations that affect our profitability are authorized (as in the case of our Master Development Programs) or established (as in the case of
our maximum rates) by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation for five-year terms. Except under limited circumstances, we generally do not have the ability to unilaterally change our obligations (such as the investment obligations under
our Master Development Programs or the obligation under our concessions to provide a public service) or increase our maximum rates applicable under those regulations should the passenger traffic or other assumptions on which the regulations were
based change during the applicable term. In addition, there can be no assurance that this price regulation system will not be amended in a manner that would cause additional sources of our revenues to be regulated.

We cannot predict how the regulations governing our business will be applied.

Many of the laws, regulations and instruments that regulate our business were adopted or became effective in 1999, and there is limited
precedent that would allow us to predict the impact of these legal requirements on our future operations. In addition, although Mexican law establishes ranges of sanctions that might be imposed should we fail to comply with the terms of one of our
concessions, the Mexican Airport Law and its regulations or other applicable laws, we cannot predict the sanctions that are likely to be assessed for a given violation within these ranges. We cannot provide assurance that we will not encounter
difficulties in complying with these laws, regulations and instruments. Although our maximum rates through 2014 have been set, we cannot predict what our Master Development Programs for the next five-year period from 2015 to 2019 will establish. We
also cannot provide assurance that other regulatory agencies or the Mexican legislature will not impose regulations adverse to our operations in the future or that the laws and regulations governing our business, including the Master Development
Programs, the maximum rate-setting process and the Mexican Airport Law, will not change in the future or be applied or interpreted in a way that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For instance, on December 14,
2011, a bill was introduced in Mexicos Congress to amend the Mexican Airport Law. The bill proposes that the Ministry of Communications and Transportation gain additional authority to plan



17



---

##### Table of Contents

and apply the standards, policies and programs for the Mexican airport system, to oversee the correct operation of civil aviation in Mexico and to establish rules for airport service providers
and the general basis for flight schedules, so as to guarantee the competitiveness of Mexicos airports. On December 19, 2012, the bill was approved and sent to the Mexican Senate for review. As of the date of this report, the Senate has
not voted on the bill. We cannot predict whether this amendment will be adopted or, if adopted, the impact it would have on us.

The regulations
pursuant to which the maximum rates applicable to our aeronautical revenues are established do not guarantee that we or any of our airports will be profitable.

The regulations applicable to our aeronautical activities establish an annual maximum rate for each airport, which is the maximum annual
amount of revenues per workload unit that we may earn at that airport from services subject to price regulation. The maximum rates for our airports have been determined for each year through 2014. For a discussion of the framework for establishing
our maximum rates and the application of these rates, see Item 4, Information on the Company  Regulatory Framework  Aeronautical Services Regulation. Under the terms of our concessions, there is no guarantee that our
consolidated results of operations or the results of operations of any airport will be profitable.

Our concessions provide that an
airports maximum rates will be adjusted periodically for inflation determined by reference to the Mexican Producer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor), excluding petroleum. Although we are entitled to request
additional adjustments to an airports maximum rates under certain circumstances, including the amendment of certain provisions of the Mexican laws and regulations that structure and influence our business, our concessions provide that such a
request will be approved only if the Ministry of Communications and Transportation determines that certain events specified in our concessions have occurred. The circumstances under which we are entitled to an adjustment are described under
Item 4, Information on the Company  Regulatory Framework  Special Adjustments to Maximum Rates. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any such request would be made or granted.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected by required efficiency adjustments to our maximum rates.

In addition, our maximum rates are subject to annual efficiency adjustments, which have the effect of reducing the maximum rates for each year
to reflect projected efficiency improvements. For the five-year term ending 2014, an annual efficiency adjustment factor of 70 basis points was established by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Future annual efficiency adjustments
will be determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation in connection with the setting of each airports maximum rates every five years. For a description of these efficiency adjustments, see Item 4, Information on the
Company  Regulatory Framework  Methodology for Determining Future Maximum Rates. We cannot provide assurance that we will achieve efficiency improvements sufficient to allow us to maintain or increase our operating income as a
result of the progressive decrease in each airports maximum rate.

If we exceed the maximum rate at any airport at the end of any year, we
could be subject to sanctions.

Historically, we have set the prices we charge for aeronautical services at each airport to come
as close as possible to the authorized maximum rate for that airport in any given year. We expect to continue to pursue this pricing strategy in the future. For example, in 2011, 2012 and 2013 our revenues subject to maximum rate regulation
represented 99.9%, 100.0%, and 100.0%, respectively, of the amount we were entitled to earn under the maximum rates for all of our airports. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to establish prices in the future that allow us to
collect virtually all of the revenues we are entitled to earn from services subject to price regulation.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

The specific prices we charge for aeronautical services are determined based on various factors,
including projections of passenger traffic volumes, the Mexican Producer Price Index excluding petroleum, and the value of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar. These variables are outside of our control. Our projections could differ from the
applicable actual data, and if these differences occur at the end of any year, they could cause us to exceed the maximum rate at any one or more of our airports during that year.

If we exceed the maximum rate at any airport at the end of any year, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may assess a fine and
may reduce the maximum rate at that airport in the subsequent year. The imposition of sanctions for violations of certain terms of a concession, including for exceeding an airports maximum rate, can result in termination of the concession if
the relevant term has been violated and sanctions have been imposed at least three times for the same cause. In the event that any one of our airport concessions is terminated, our other airport concessions may also be terminated.

In prior years, in order to ensure our compliance with the maximum rate at a particular airport when the possibility of exceeding that maximum
rate has arisen, we have taken actions in the latter part of the year, such as reducing our specific prices and offering discounts. We can offer no assurance that, should external factors cause us to risk exceeding our maximum rates close to or at
the end of any given year, we will have sufficient time to take the actions described above in order to avoid exceeding our maximum rates prior to year-end.

If we fail to fulfill the requirements of our Master Development Programs during a given five-year period, we could be subject to sanctions from the
Mexican government.

Historically, our capital expenditure commitments under our Master Development Programs are determined
by reference to the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment (Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor, sector construcción, materiales, alquiler de maquinaria y
remuneraciones). Using the index we aim to be as close as possible to the five-year period capital expenditure commitments at any time. We expect to continue this capital expenditure control strategy in the future. Using this strategy, our
capital expenditure during 2011, 2012 and 2013 was 100.4%, 101.1%, and 102.8%, respectively, of the commitment for all of our airports during that period. However, there can be no assurance that our capital expenditure control strategy will be
sufficiently accurate and that we will not fall below our capital expenditure commitments. If as a consequence of the annual maximum tariff fulfillment review the Ministry of Communications and Transportation determines that we are not in compliance
with the committed investments, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may assess a fine and may reduce the maximum rate of that airport in the subsequent year. Non-compliance with committed investments could also result in the
termination of the concession if the relevant term has been violated and sanctions have been imposed at least three times for the same cause. In the event that any one of our concessions is terminated, our other concessions may also be
terminated.

Although in prior years, in order to ensure compliance with our Master Development Programs, we have taken actions in
the latter part of the year, such as increasing the amount or pace of certain construction projects, we can give no assurance that, should external factors cause us to risk failing to meet our investment levels, we will have sufficient time to take
actions to comply with our Master Development Programs.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

The Mexican government may terminate or reacquire our concessions under various circumstances, some of
which are beyond our control.

Our concessions are our principal assets, and we would be unable to continue operations without
them. A concession may be revoked by the Mexican government for certain prescribed reasons, including failure to comply with our Master Development Programs, a temporary or permanent halt in our operations, actions affecting the operations of other
concession holders in Mexico, failure to pay damages resulting from our operations, exceeding our maximum rates or failure to comply with any other material term of our concessions. Violations of certain terms of a concession (including violations
for exceeding the applicable maximum rate) can result in revocation of a concession only if sanctions have been imposed for violations of the relevant term at least three times. Violations of other terms of a concession can result in the immediate
termination of the concession. Our concessions may also be terminated upon our bankruptcy or insolvency.

We would face similar sanctions
for violations of the Mexican Airport Law or the regulations thereunder. Under applicable Mexican law and the terms of our concessions, our concessions may also be made subject to additional conditions, including under our renewed Master Development
Programs, which we may be unable to meet. Failure to meet these conditions may also result in fines, other sanctions and the termination of the concessions.

The Mexican government may also revoke one or more of our concessions at any time through reversion, if, in accordance with applicable
Mexican law, it determines that it is in the public interest to do so. The Mexican government may also assume the operation of any airport in the event of war, public disturbance or a threat to national security. In addition, in the case of a
force majeure event, the Mexican government may require us to implement certain changes in our operations. In the event of a reversion of the public domain assets that are the subject of our concessions, the Mexican government under Mexican
law is required to compensate us for the value of the concessions or added costs based on the results of an audit performed by appraisers. In the case of a mandated change in our operations, the Mexican government is required to compensate us for
the cost of that change. Similarly, in the event of an assumption of our operations, other than in the event of war, the government is required to compensate us and any other affected parties for any resulting damages. There can be no assurance that
we would receive compensation equivalent to the value of our investment in, or any additional damages related to, our concessions and related assets in the event of such action.

In the event that any one of our airports concessions is terminated, whether through revocation or otherwise, our other concessions may
also be terminated. Thus, the loss of any concession would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

The Mexican
government could grant new concessions that compete with our airports.

The Mexican government could grant additional concessions
to operate existing government-managed airports, authorize the construction of new airports or allow existing privately held domestic airports to change into international airports and permit them to receive regular domestic and international
flights, all of which could lead to increased competition for our airports.

One factor that may significantly increase competition from
other airports is the expansion of the permits of existing private airports that are currently not permitted to operate regular commercial routes. Under Mexican law, any privately held airport that has operated with a permit to give public service
for at least five years automatically acquires the right to also operate regularly scheduled commercial flights and to receive a concession to operate as a public service airport. In addition, through an amendment proposed by the Ministry of
Communications and Transportation and confirmed by the Presidency, an airport operating with a permit to provide public service could become an international airport. For example, the



20



---

##### Table of Contents

owner of a small private airport near Cabo San Lucas received a permit to offer public service in March 2008 from the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. On November 4, 2009, in
response to a petition submitted to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, this airport was authorized to operate regular commercial routes for domestic and international flights. Accordingly, this airport could eventually begin
operating commercial flights, domestic or international, and compete with our Los Cabos International Airport. Until now, we have not experienced any material adverse effect on our business or results of operations from this airport, but it is
possible that we may in the future.

Any competition from other such airports could have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations. Under certain circumstances, the grant of a concession for a new or existing airport must be made pursuant to a public bidding process. In the event that a competing concession is offered in a public bidding process, we
cannot provide assurance that we would participate in such process, or that we would be successful if we were to participate. Please see Item 4, Information on the Company  Regulatory Framework  Penalties and Termination and
Revocation of Concessions and Concession Assets  Grants of New Concessions.

The Ministry of Communications and
Transportation could require us to monitor certain aircraft movements at our airports that we do not currently control, which could result in increased costs.

The Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority (Servicios a la Navegación en el Espacio Aéreo Mexicano) currently
requires us to manage and control aircraft movements in and out of our arrival and departure gates and remote boarding locations directly at our Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta International Airports. At our other airports, these aircraft movements
are monitored directly by the Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority. Should the Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority require us to control these aircraft movements directly at any or all of our other ten airports in the future, our results of
operations could be negatively impacted by increased operating insurance and liability costs resulting from taking on these obligations.

Risks
Related to Our Controlling Shareholder

AMP controls our management, and AMPs interests may differ from those of other shareholders. In the
past, disputes among AMPs shareholders have affected us.

AMP holds Series BB shares currently representing 15% of our
outstanding capital stock. The Series BB shares have certain special rights that allow AMP to exercise significant control over our management. Through its right to appoint and remove members of our senior management, AMP has the ability to direct
the actions of our management in areas such as business strategy, operations, financing, acquisitions and dispositions of assets or business.

Pursuant to our bylaws, AMP (as holder of our Series BB shares) has the right to appoint and remove our top-level executive officers,
(upon consultation with our Nominations and Compensation Committee), to elect four members of our board of directors and their alternates and to designate three of the members of our Operating Committee and 20% of the members of each other board
committee (or one member of any committee consisting of fewer than five members), except for the Audit Committee whose members are selected according to Mexican and U.S. independence standards. AMP (as holder of our Series BB shares) also has
the right pursuant to our bylaws to veto certain actions requiring the approval of our shareholders (including the approval of our financial statements, increases or decreases of our capital stock, the payment of dividends, the amendment of our
bylaws and any decision that has the objective to modify or annul its right to appoint our top-level executive officers). These rights are not conditioned on whether or not the technical assistance agreement and the participation agreement remain in
force. Pursuant to our bylaws, if at any time AMP (as the holder of our Series BB shares) were to hold less than 7.65% of our capital stock in the form of Series BB shares, it would lose its veto rights (but not



21



---

##### Table of Contents

other special rights). If at any time after August 25, 2014, AMP were to hold less than 7.65% of our capital stock in the form of Series BB shares, such shares would be mandatorily
converted into Series B shares, which would cause AMP to lose all of its special rights. Shareholders of AMP have allocated among themselves certain veto rights relating to the exercise by AMP of its veto and other rights, which increases the
risk of impasse at the shareholders meeting of AMP and ultimately at our shareholders meetings. Differences in points of view among AMPs shareholders with respect to our management could affect our results of operations. The
interests of AMP may differ from those of our other shareholders, and we can offer no assurance that AMP and the officers appointed by AMP will exercise their rights in ways that favor the interests of our other shareholders.

In 2010 and 2011, disputes among AMPs shareholders affected our shareholders meetings and trading of our shares on the Mexican
Stock Exchange and the NYSE, as well as involving us in litigation. Notwithstanding those disputes, on December 1, 2011, we were advised by AMPs shareholders that they had entered into an agreement to end their dispute and to terminate
their legal proceedings. As a result, during 2012, all proceedings among AMPs shareholders including proceedings brought against us were terminated. Additionally, we were informed that AMPs shareholders agreed to a comprehensive
mechanism for decision-making (primarily by consensus, but with specific mechanisms aimed at avoiding deadlocks that could affect our operations), and AMPs shareholders will continue developing our business. They also affirmed their intent to
defend the rights granted to them by the Mexican Government. The agreement further confirms the original ownership percentage in AMP of each of its three shareholders.

Stemming from the dispute among AMPs shareholders, on April 25, 2011, we received a formal notice from the Comisión
Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (National Banking and Securities Commission, or the CNBV) by which it initiated an administrative proceeding against us for alleged violations of Mexican disclosure statutes primarily in connection with
the disputes among AMPs shareholders during 2010. The formal notice was the first stage in an administrative proceeding by the CNBV to impose economic sanctions on us. On June 3, 2011, we exercised our right to appeal the CNBVs
determination and presented evidence to respond to the notification. On April 24, 2013, we were notified by the CNBV about the imposition of administrative penalties. We challenged these penalties via an administrative proceeding filed on
June 27, 2013, before the Fiscal Federal and Administrative Justice Court. This lawsuit has not yet been concluded. See Item 8,Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Infractions of the Mexican Securities Law alleged by
the CNBV.

If any further disputes among AMPs shareholders were to occur in the future, it is not possible to predict if
they would result in deadlock at our shareholders meetings or distract our management, or what effects such events might have on the price of our stock, its liquidity or our market value and the effects that these conflicts could have on our
business or results of operations.

In addition, AMPs veto, appointment and other rights could adversely impact our operations and
constitute an obstacle for us to bring in a new strategic shareholder and/or operator.

If AMP should decide to sell all or a portion of its
interest in us, our operations could be adversely affected.

AMP currently exercises a substantial influence over our management,
as described above. Our bylaws and certain of the agreements executed in connection with the privatization process prohibited AMP from transferring any of its Series BB shares before August 25, 2004. Since that date, AMP has been permitted
to transfer up to 49% of its Series BB shares without restriction. After August 25, 2009, AMP may additionally sell in any year up to 20% of its remaining 51% interest in our Series BB shares. Presently, therefore, AMP is able to sell
nearly all of the shares that it owns. Our bylaws provide that, subject to certain exceptions, Series BB shares must be converted into Series B shares prior to transfer. Should AMP divest its interest in us or cease to hold Series BB
shares, our management could change and our operations could be adversely and significantly affected as a result.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Our operations could be adversely affected if the technical assistance agreement is not renewed with AMP.

As described above, AMP exercises a substantial influence over our management through the technical assistance agreement, through
which AMP provides our airports with expertise in operating in the aeronautical sector and strategic planning guidance to increase aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, in addition to knowledge of the Mexican government and business
sectors and assistance with the negotiation of our Master Development Programs. Therefore, if either we or AMP decides not to renew the technical assistance agreement, it would require time and potentially higher costs for us to replace AMPs
strategic expertise through contracts with new external advisors; apart from the possible higher costs, the need to replace AMP could have an impact on our business strategy and ongoing projects, such as the successful negotiation of tariffs,
investments and other elements of our Master Development Programs for the next 5 years. As a result, our results of operations could be negatively affected. We were recently involved in a lawsuit regarding the renewal of the technical assistance
agreement. For more detailed information, see Item 8,Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. convokes Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting via irregular channels and
Item 4, Information on the Company  History and Development of the Company  Investment by AMP.

Official inquiries
relating to certain requirements of the privatization guidelines and the participation agreement relating to our privatization could have a material and adverse effect on our operations or the value of our securities.

In 1999, as part of the first stage in the process of opening Mexicos airports to private investment, the Mexican government sold a 15%
equity interest in us to AMP pursuant to a public bidding process.

Pursuant to the guidelines published by the Mexican government during
the first phase of our privatization and the participation agreement setting forth the rights and obligations of each of the parties involved in our privatization, AMP assumed certain rights and obligations.

In 2004 and 2005, various reports in the Mexican press alleged that AMP did not comply with certain of its obligations under the privatization
guidelines and the participation agreement, specifically the requirements related to the nationality of AMPs Mexican partner. In June 2005, the Permanent Commission of the Mexican Federal Congress (Comisión Permanente del
Congreso Federal) requested that the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and other agencies of the federal government investigate these allegations and report on our share ownership structure and certain related matters.

In January 2006, the previous Mexican partner sold its 25.5% interest in AMP to Controladora Mexicana de Aeropuertos, S.A. de C.V., or
Controladora Mexicana, a Mexican company 50% owned by Pal Aeropuertos, S.A. de C.V., and 50% owned by Promotora Aeronáutica del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation approved the sale to Controladora
Mexicana, including its role as AMPs Mexican partner pursuant to the privatization guidelines and the participation agreement relating to our privatization.

Although we believe AMP satisfies all their requirements under the privatization guidelines and the participation agreement, there can be no
assurance that allegations or official inquiries relating to AMPs compliance with its obligations under those requirements will not take place. In the event of future inquiries or an official finding that AMP is or was not in compliance with
the requirements of the privatization guidelines or the participation agreement, AMP could be subject to fines and the technical



23



---

##### Table of Contents

assistance agreement between us and AMP could be terminated, which could have a material effect on our operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that any such developments would not
result in a material decrease in the market value of our shares or ADSs or their liquidity.

Certain actions by Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V.
may affect our management, financial condition or results of operations.

On June 13, 2011, Grupo México, S.A.B. de
C.V. (Grupo México) announced that its board of directors had approved the acquisition, directly or indirectly, of at least 30%, and up to 100%, of our shares outstanding at that time, excluding treasury shares, through a public
tender offer. At that time, Grupo México had disclosed that it owned 20% of our total outstanding capital stock, all in the form of Series B shares. On March 29, 2012, Grupo México informed its shareholders that it had withdrawn
its request for the authorization for a public tender offer from the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores).

In its most recent filing on Form 13D with the SEC on April 1, 2014, Grupo México disclosed that it owned 25.4% of our total
outstanding capital stock.

Articles X and XII of our bylaws, among others, limit the ability of Series B shareholders, directly or with
related parties, other than AMP, to hold more than 10% of our outstanding capital stock, and any shares held in excess of that amount must be sold in a public offering. In accordance with our bylaws, until the public offering of such shares takes
place, such excess shares have no voting power and cannot be represented in any Shareholders Meeting.

Grupo México commenced
two legal proceedings, among others, seeking (i) to modify our bylaws to eliminate the foregoing limitations and (ii) to terminate AMPs special rights that stem from AMPs ownership of our Series BB shares. The proceeding
regarding AMPs special rights is currently pending. If successful, these proceedings could affect AMPs special rights (for additional information, see  AMP controls our management, and AMPs interests may differ from
those of other shareholders in this section). The proceeding regarding the modification of our bylaws is also pending. Initially, Grupo México obtained a favorable decision from a civil court in Mexico City. We appealed this
decision; however, on February 25, 2013 we were notified that the decision was affirmed on appeal by the appellate court. We filed a direct amparo appeal on March 19, 2013, which will be resolved by a federal court. On
April 10, 2013, we were informed that the court ordered the suspension of the civil courts decisions, pending the resolution of our appeal. On February 19, 2014, the Mexican Supreme Court agreed to review the legal proceeding
regarding ownership limits contained in the Companys by-laws.

Although Grupo México prevailed in the lower courts in
the proceeding regarding our bylaws, these decisions have been suspended while the Supreme Court proceeding continues to be pending. Consequently, until a final decision is issued, our by-laws remain valid and binding upon our shareholders,
including the obligation to dispose of shares held by Grupo México above the 10% threshold specified in our by-laws. Nonetheless, we cannot predict the content and scope of any judicial decision, and a decision by the Supreme Court that is
adverse to our bylaws could materially and adversely affect AMPs special rights and our future management, policies, strategies and results of operations. See Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Litigation
related to Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. and suits seeking to void certain of our bylaws.

On
November 16, 2013, an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting was convoked by means of a judicial order issued on November 12, 2013, by the 38th Judge for Civil Matters in the Federal District, in response to a petition submitted by Grupo
México. This Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting was to take place on December 3, 2013. The stated objective of the meeting was the possible approval of the non-renewal of the technical assistance agreement with AMP. We filed
an amparo proceeding before the



24



---

##### Table of Contents

federal 6th Civil District Court for the First Circuit in order to halt the carrying out of the shareholders meeting, and a provisional suspension of the shareholders meeting was
granted on November 27, 2013. In addition, we filed for an injunction against the meeting before the 10th Judge for Commercial Matters for the city of Guadalajara, Jalisco, from which we also received a favorable decision on November 29,
2013. Grupo México appealed this latter injunction, and they were successful in getting this injunction lifted on December 2, 2013. However, Grupo México did not appeal the November 27, 2013 injunction. Nonetheless, the
extraordinary Shareholders Meeting did take place, in contravention of the court orders issued in respect of the amparoproceedings. On February 21, 2014, a Mexican federal final court of appeals declared the shareholders
meeting that took place on December 3, 2013 fully null and void; as a result, all resolutions approved at this meeting were similarly declared null and void. This resolution is definitive and not appealable. See Item 8, Financial
Information  Legal Proceedings  Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. convokes Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting via irregular channels.

It is not possible to predict the extent to which these disputes with Grupo México will distract our management, the effects that
future developments in this dispute might have on the price of our stock, its liquidity or our market value or the effects that these conflicts could have on our business or results of operations.

We filed a suit against all Mexican stock brokers requiring them to adhere to our bylaws and to enjoin them from acquiring our capital stock for Grupo
México and its subsidiaries. Actions by the Mexican stock brokers in response to this suit may affect us.

In accordance
with a decision of a Mexican court that instructs us and our directors and officers to take all necessary legal measures to maintain and protect our bylaws, on February 15, 2012 we initiated a lawsuit against all Mexican stock market brokers
seeking that the stock market brokers strictly adhere to our bylaws and to restrict the sale of our shares to Grupo México and its subsidiaries if, in violation of our bylaws, they hold, individually or in the aggregate, more than 10% of our
total outstanding capital stock.

On February 29, 2012, we were informed that a court issued preliminary injunctions that constrained
Mexican stock brokers to, among other things, refrain from trading our shares for an individual, group or group of related entities, that could result in any way in the acquisition of an ownership position that exceeds the 10% maximum allowed by
Article X of our bylaws. On December 14, 2012, the State of Jaliscos Fifth Mercantile Court issued a new ruling that lifted the injunctions. We appealed that order through an indirect amparo on January 3, 2013. On
October 30, 2013, a final appellate court ratified the injunctions, overturning the order issued in December 2012. See Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  We filed legal action against all the Mexican stock
market brokers, seeking adherence to our bylaws.

We cannot predict the consequences from this proceeding or the future actions
of the Mexican stock brokers, including any limitations on our access to financing. It is also not possible to predict what effects future developments in this dispute might have on the price of our stock, its liquidity or our market value and
the effects that this conflict could have on our business or results of operations.

Risks Related to Mexico

Adverse economic conditions in Mexico may adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.

All of our operations are conducted in Mexico and are dependent upon the performance of the Mexican economy. As a result, our business,
financial condition or results of operations may be affected by the general condition of the Mexican economy, over which we have no control. In the past, Mexico has experienced economic crises, caused by internal and external factors, characterized
by exchange rate



25



---

##### Table of Contents

instability (including large devaluations), high inflation, high domestic interest rates, economic contraction, a reduction of international capital flows, a reduction of liquidity in the banking
sector and high unemployment rates. We cannot assure that such conditions will not return or that such conditions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Mexico began to enter a recession in the fourth quarter of 2008, during which GDP fell by approximately 1.6% and inflation increased by 2.5%.
According to the Mexican National Institute for Statistics and Geography (INEGI), GDP fell by an additional 6.5% and inflation increased by an additional 3.6% in 2009. The Mexican economy has since rebounded, and gross domestic product increased
3.9% in 2011, 3.9% in 2012 and 1.1% in 2013, in each case compared with the previous year.

While interest rates in Mexico have
remained at historical lows, Mexico has had, and in the future may have, high real and nominal interest rates. The annualized interest rates for Mexican Treasury Bills (Cetes), issued for 28-day period averaged approximately 4.3%, 4.2%, and
3.7% for 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. As of April 10, 2014, the Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate (Tasa de Interés Interbancaria de Equilibrio, or TIIE) issued for the 28-day period was 3.81%. To the extent
that we incur peso-denominated debt in the future, it could be at high interest rates.

If the Mexican economy does not continue to
recover, if inflation or interest rates increase significantly or if the Mexican economy is otherwise adversely impacted, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Depreciation or fluctuation of the peso relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Any future significant appreciation or depreciation of the peso could impact our aggregate passenger traffic volume, which could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Following the devaluation of the peso and the economic crisis beginning in 1994, the aggregate passenger traffic volume in our airports in 1995 (then operated by our predecessor) decreased
as compared to prior years, reflecting a decrease in Mexican passenger traffic volume that more than offset an increase in international passenger traffic volume. Another substantial decrease in value could occur, and it could (notwithstanding other
factors) lead to a decrease in domestic passenger traffic that may not be offset by any increase in international passenger traffic. In 2011, the peso depreciated 12.7% against the dollar as compared to the previous year. In 2012, the peso
appreciated 7.1% against the dollar. In 2013, the peso depreciated 1.0% against the dollar. Any future significant appreciation of the peso could impact our aggregate passenger volume by increasing the cost of travel for international passengers.
Depreciation of the peso could impact our aggregate passenger traffic volume by increasing the cost of travel for domestic passengers.

Although all of our current indebtedness is denominated in pesos, depending on economic and credit market conditions in Mexico, we may incur
dollar-denominated debt to finance investments we make in the future. Under this scenario, a devaluation of the peso would increase the debt service cost of such dollar-denominated indebtedness and result in foreign exchange losses.

In addition, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the peso and the U.S. dollar, particularly depreciations, may adversely affect the U.S.
dollar equivalent of the peso price of the Series B shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange. As a result, such peso depreciations will likely affect the market price of the ADSs. Exchange rate fluctuations would also affect the ADS
depositarys ability to convert into U.S. dollars, and make timely payment of, any peso cash dividends and other distributions paid in respect of the Series B shares.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

The value and prices of securities issued by Mexican companies may be adversely affected by developments in
other countries.

The Mexican economy may be, to varying degrees, affected by economic and market conditions in other countries.
Although economic conditions in other countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Mexico, investors reactions to adverse developments in other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Mexican
issuers. For instance, the credit freeze and global recession that began in 2007 and continued into 2009 had a significant impact in Mexico. Mexicos stock market fell 48% during that period. Similarly, the European debt crisis that began in
Greece and then spread to other countries such as Italy and Spain as well as European financial institutions, affected financial markets around the world and in Mexico.

In addition, economic conditions in Mexico are strongly correlated with economic conditions in the United States as a result of NAFTA and
increased economic activity between the two countries. Therefore, adverse economic conditions in the United States, the termination of NAFTA or other related events could have a material adverse effect on the Mexican economy. We cannot provide
assurance that events in other emerging market countries, in the United States or elsewhere, will not materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Political conditions in Mexico could materially and adversely affect Mexican economic policy or business conditions and, in turn, our operations.

The Mexican government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Mexican economy. Mexican
governmental actions concerning the economy could have a significant impact on Mexican private sector entities in general, as well as on market conditions and prices and returns on Mexican securities, including our securities.

Enrique Peña Nieto, a member of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), began a six-year term as president of Mexico
on December 1, 2012, after being elected to office on July 1, 2012. As with any governmental change, this change to the countrys administration may lead to significant changes in laws, public policies or regulations, may affect the
political and economic environment in Mexico, and consequently, they may contribute to economic uncertainty and to heightened volatility of the Mexican capital markets and in securities issued by Mexican companies. In addition, because in the
July 1, 2012 election for Congress, no single party obtained a clear majority, governmental gridlock and political uncertainty may occur.

We cannot provide any assurances that changes in the policies of Mexicos federal government will not have an adverse effect on our
business, financial conditions and results of operations. Consequently we cannot provide assurances that Mexican political or social developments, over which we have no control, will not adversely affect our financial conditions, results of
operations, our ability to make dividend payments to our shareholders or the market price of our securities.

Federal tax legislation reforms in
Mexico may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Mexican government has in recent
years implemented various changes to the tax laws applicable to Mexican companies, including us. The terms of our concessions do not exempt us from any changes to the Mexican tax laws. Should the Mexican government implement changes to the tax laws
that result in our having significantly higher tax liability, we would be required to pay the higher amounts due pursuant to any such changes, which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Recently, tax reforms were enacted in Mexico that came into force on January 1, 2014. Among
other changes, these reforms maintained the income tax rate on corporations of 30% despite the previously planned reduction; imposed withholding tax in respect of dividends paid to Mexican and foreign shareholders; eliminated deductions previously
allowed in respect of payments between related parties or certain foreign corporations; limited the tax deductions for certain benefits paid to employees; and increased the value-added tax in certain areas of Mexico.

We have analyzed the scope and implications of the tax reform 2014 on us. In part based on our analysis, we filed an amparo in February
2014 to protect certain rights that we believe were violated by the implementation of the tax reform. Nonetheless, we cannot predict the impact that the tax reform will have, if fully implemented and applied to us, on our business, financial
condition and results of operations, as a result of higher payroll taxes and higher costs due to additional compliance measures. In addition, we cannot predict the indirect impact that this legislation could have on our customers and shareholders;
as one possible effect, our shareholders may be required to pay more taxes than they would have paid prior to the implementation of these tax reforms.

Changes to Mexican laws, regulations and decrees applicable to us could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

The Mexican government has in recent years implemented various changes to the laws applicable to Mexican companies, including us. The terms of
our concessions do not exempt us from any changes to Mexican laws. Changes to the Mexican constitution or to any other Mexican laws could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

For instance, in July 2013, the Federal Law for the Prevention and Identification of Transactions with Proceeds of Illicit Origin was enacted.
Its overriding goal is to build up prevention systems as part of the government strategies to combat criminal organizations and their activities, such as money laundering, terrorism financing, carjacking, robbery and kidnapping; enhance detection of
activities in which illegal proceeds are engaged; and also enforce certain restrictions regarding cash transactions. This new law imposes additional obligations and responsibilities on companies legal representatives, establishing significant
fines and even criminal liability for those who do not comply with the law or who withhold relevant information.

In addition, the
Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation (Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil) is responsible for establishing the official operating schedules of our airports. Outside of our airports official hours of operation, we are
permitted to double our airport charges for services that we provide. Currently, our airports at Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta and Morelia have official operating schedules of 24 hours per day. The Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation can issue a decree
extending the official operating schedule of one or more of our other airports from its current schedule, which would deprive us of the ability to double our airport charges for off-hour services at airports for which such a decree has been issued.
For instance, as of January 17, 2014, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation expanded the operating schedule of our Aguascalientes airport from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. There can be no assurance that upon issuance we will
be successful in avoiding the consequences of such a decree.

High incidences of crime in Mexico and violence related to drug trafficking
could adversely affect our business.

Travel alerts issued by the U.S. Department of State (Bureau of Consular Affairs), the most
recent as of January 9, 2014 (the Travel Warnings), informed of the risks of traveling in Mexico due to threats to safety and security posed by transnational criminal organizations in the country and the increased violence in many
towns and cities across Mexico but mostly occurring in certain cities in northern



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Mexico, including Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana, Chihuahua City, Nogales, Matamoros, Reynosa and Monterrey, and in the central regions of Zacatecas, Morelia, Cuernavaca and San Luis Potosi. According to
the Travel Warnings, while millions of U.S. citizens safely visit Mexico each year, some are victims of violence.

According to the Travel
Warnings, a number of states along the border and south-western Mexico continue to experience high levels of many types of crimes with notable spikes in Chihuahua, Sinaloa, Guerrero, Michoacan, and northern Baja California.

Higher incidences of crime throughout Mexico and drug trafficking related violence could have an adverse effect on our business as it may
decrease the international passenger traffic directed to Mexico.

Natural disasters could adversely affect our business.

From time to time, the Pacific and Central regions of Mexico experience torrential rains and hurricanes (particularly during the months of
July through September), as well as earthquakes. Natural disasters may impede operations, damage infrastructure necessary to our operations or adversely affect the destinations served by our airports. For example, in September 2013, our Puerto
Vallarta and Manzanillo airports suffered the effects of Hurricane Manuel. Although the two airports experienced only minor damage, our Manzanillo airport was closed for three days, due instead to damage to the roads to and from the airport. Any of
these events could reduce our passenger traffic volume. The occurrence of natural disasters in the destinations we serve could adversely affect our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition. We have insured the physical
facilities at our airports against damage caused by natural disasters, accidents or other similar events, but do not have insurance covering losses due to resulting business interruption. Moreover, should losses occur, there can be no assurance that
losses caused by damages to the physical facilities will not exceed the pre-established limits on any of our insurance policies.

Increased
environmental regulation and enforcement in Mexico may affect us.

The level of environmental regulation in Mexico is increasing
and the enforcement of environmental laws has become more common. There can be no assurance that environmental regulations or their enforcement will not change in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, prospects or financial condition.

Minority shareholders may be less able to enforce their rights against us, our directors, or our
controlling shareholders in Mexico.

Under Mexican law, the protections afforded to minority shareholders are different from those
afforded to minority shareholders in the United States. For example, because provisions concerning fiduciary duties of directors have only recently been incorporated into the new Securities Market Law, it may be difficult for minority shareholders
to bring an action against directors for breach of this duty and achieve the same results as in most jurisdictions in the United States. In addition, the procedures for class action lawsuits were incorporated into Mexican law and became effective in
March 2012; however, certain rules and procedures could be different than the ones in the United States. Therefore, in some cases it may be more difficult for minority shareholders to enforce their rights against us, our directors, or our
controlling shareholders than it would be for minority shareholders of a U.S. company.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

We are subject to different corporate disclosure and accounting standards than U.S. companies.

A principal objective of the securities laws of the United States, Mexico, and other countries is to promote full and fair disclosure of all
material corporate information, including accounting information. However, there may be different or less publicly available information about issuers of securities in Mexico than is regularly made available by public companies in countries with
highly developed capital markets, including the United States.

In addition, accounting standards and disclosure requirements in Mexico
differ from those of the United States. Our Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, which differs from U.S. GAAP in a number of respects. Items on the financial statements of a company prepared in accordance with IFRS may not
reflect its financial position or results of operations in the way they would be reflected, if such financial statements had been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.



|Item 4. | Information on the Company
|------- | --------------------------

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
COMPANY

We were incorporated in 1998 as part of the Mexican governments program for the opening of Mexicos
airports to private investment. The duration of our corporate existence has been set at 100 years. We hold concessions to operate, maintain and develop 12 airports in the Pacific and central regions of Mexico. Each of our concessions has a term of
50 years beginning on November 1, 1998. The term of each of our concessions may be extended by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation under certain circumstances for up to 50 additional years. As operator of the 12 airports under our
concessions, we charge airlines, passengers and other users fees for the use of the airports facilities. We also derive rental and other income from commercial activities conducted at our airports, such as the leasing of space to restaurants
and retailers. For a description of our capital expenditures, see Master Development Programs below.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a corporation (sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable)
organized under the laws of Mexico. The address of our registered office is as set forth on the cover of this annual report on Form 20-F. Our telephone number is (52) (33) 3880-1100. Our U.S. agent is Puglisi & Associates. Our
U.S. agents address is 850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, Delaware 19711.

Opening of Mexican Airports to Investment

In February 1998, the Mexican government issued the Investment Guidelines for the Opening of Investment in the Mexican Airport
System. Under these guidelines, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation identified 35 of Mexicos 58 principal airports as being suitable for investment. These 35 airports were divided into four groups: Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (currently consisting of our 12 airports), Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, or the Southeast Group (currently consisting of nine airports), Grupo Aeroportuario de la Ciudad de México, D.F., or the
Mexico City Group (currently consisting of one airport) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro-Norte, or the Central-North Group (currently consisting of 13 airports). The guidelines generally provided for the airport groups to become open to
investment through a two-stage program. All of the groups except the Mexico City Group have completed both stages of the program.

In the first stage, a series of public bidding processes were conducted to award a minority interest in each airport group to a strategic
shareholder. In the second stage, all or a portion of the remaining interest in each airport group was sold through public offerings in the Mexican and international capital markets.

As a result of the opening of Mexicos airports to investment, we and our subsidiaries are no longer subject to the Mexican regulations
applicable to government wholly-owned companies. We believe that this provides us greater flexibility to develop and implement our business strategy and to respond to potential business opportunities.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Investment by AMP

In 1999, as part of the first stage in the process of opening Mexicos airports to investment, the Mexican government sold a 15% equity
interest in us to AMP, pursuant to a public bidding process.

The following are AMPs current shareholders:



| |  |  | AENA Desarrollo Internacional, S.A. (AENA), owns 33.33% of AMP. AENA is a private company that is a subsidiary of Aena Aeropuertos, S.A., a subsidiary of Grupo AENA, a Spanish state-owned company that
manages all airport operations in Spain. Aeropuertos Españoles y Navegación Aérea operates 47 airports in Spain and is one of the largest airport operators in the world. Pursuant to the privatization guidelines published by the
Mexican government during the first phase of our privatization, requiring our strategic shareholder to have, among other characteristics, an operating partner and a Mexican partner (each, a key partner), AENA is one of AMPs two key
partners, acting as its operating partner. In addition to its investment in AMP, AENA also directly manages four other airports in Latin America. In addition, AENA owns 10.0% of Airport Concessions and Development Limited, which owns a British
airport company that operates thirteen airports in Europe, North America and Latin America through ownership, concession or management arrangements.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Controladora Mexicana (CMA) owns 33.33% of AMP. Controladora Mexicana is a private company 50%-owned by Pal Aeropuertos, S.A. de C.V. and 50%-owned by Promotora Aeronáutica del Pacífico, S.A.
de C.V.; Pal Aeropuertos, S.A. de C.V. is a Mexican special purpose vehicle owned by Eduardo Sánchez Navarro Redo; Promotora Aeronáutica del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. is a Mexican special purpose vehicle owned by Laura Diez Barroso
Azcárraga and her husband, Carlos Laviada Ocejo. Mrs. Diez Barroso, Mr. Laviada Ocejo, and Mr. Sánchez Navarro are Mexican investors with substantial business interests in a variety of industries, including real estate.
Pursuant to the privatization guidelines described above, Controladora Mexicana is AMPs second key partner, acting as its Mexican partner.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Desarollo de Concesiones Aeroportuarias, S.A. (DCA), a subsidiary of Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A. (Abertis), owns 33.33% of AMP. Abertis is a European company that manages infrastructure,
carrying out projects in the fields of motorways, telecommunications and airports. Abertis operates in 17 countries on three continents. Abertis is listed on the Spanish stock exchange (Bolsa de Madrid) and forms part of the Ibex 35 index.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In 1999, AMP paid the Mexican government a total of Ps. 2.45 billion (nominal pesos, excluding interest)
(U.S.$ 261 million based on the exchange rates in effect on the date of AMPs bid) in exchange for:



| |  |  | all of our Series BB shares, representing 15% of our outstanding capital stock;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an option to subscribe for up to 5% of newly issued Series B shares (since expired without being exercised); and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the right and obligation to enter into various agreements with us and the Mexican government, including a participation agreement setting forth the rights and obligations of each of the parties involved in the
privatization (including AMP), a 15-year technical assistance agreement setting forth AMPs right and obligation to provide technical assistance to us in exchange for an annual fee and a shareholders agreement under terms established
during the bidding process. These agreements are described in greater detail in Item 7 hereof.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Under the technical assistance agreement, AMP provides management and consulting services and
transfers industry expertise and technology to us in exchange for a fee. In 2013, this fee amounted to Ps. 171.5 million. The agreement provides us an exclusive license in Mexico to use all technical assistance and expertise transferred to us by AMP
or its shareholders during the term of the agreement. The agreement is scheduled to expire on August 25, 2014, the same day the participation agreement expires. The agreement automatically renews for successive five-year terms unless one party
provides the other a notice of termination at least 60 days prior to a scheduled expiration date. Under our bylaws, a decision by us to renew or cancel the technical assistance agreement is subject to the approval of 51% of Series B
shareholders other than AMP or any related party of AMP (to the extent that AMP or any such related party holds Series B shares). A party may terminate the technical assistance agreement prior to its expiration date upon non-compliance with its
terms by the other party. AMP provides us assistance in various areas, including development of our commercial activities, preparation of marketing studies focusing on increasing passenger traffic, assistance with the preparation of the Master
Development Programs that we are required to submit to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and the improvement of our airport operations. Our management believes that the lack of technical assistance provided via our agreement with AMP
could adversely and significantly affect our results of operations. Currently, we are involved in a lawsuit regarding the renewal of the technical assistance agreement. For more detailed information, see Item 8, Financial Information 
Legal Proceedings  Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. convokes Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting via irregular channels.

Since January 1, 2002, the technical assistance fee has been equal to the greater of U.S.$ 4.0 million adjusted annually for U.S.
inflation since August 25, 2000 (measured by the U.S. Consumer Price Index) or 5% of our annual consolidated income from operations (calculated prior to deducting the technical assistance fee, income taxes and depreciation and amortization, in
each case determined in accordance with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards, or MFRS). We believe that this structure creates an incentive for AMP to increase our annual consolidated earnings. AMP is also entitled to reimbursement for the
out-of-pocket expenses it incurs in its provision of services under the agreement.

The technical assistance agreement allows AMP, its
shareholders and their affiliates to render additional services to us only if our Acquisitions Committee determines that these related parties have submitted the most favorable bid in a public bidding process involving at least three unrelated
parties. For a description of this Committee, see Item 6 herein.

Pursuant to our bylaws, AMP (as holder of our Series BB
shares) has the right to appoint and remove our top-level executive officers (upon consultation with our Nominations and Compensation Committee), to elect four members of our board of directors and their alternates and to designate three of the
members of our Operating Committee and 20% of the members of each other board committee (or one member of any committee consisting of fewer than five members). According to Mexican and United States independence standards, the members of our Audit
Committee must be independent. AMP (as holder of our Series BB shares) also has the right pursuant to our bylaws to veto certain actions requiring approval of our shareholders (including the payment of dividends, the amendment of our bylaws and
any decision that has the objective of modifying or annulling its right to appoint our top-level executive officers). Pursuant to our bylaws, if at any time AMP (as the holder of our Series BB shares) were to hold less than 7.65% of our capital
stock in the form of Series BB shares, it would lose its veto rights (but not other special rights). If at any time after August 25, 2014 AMP were to hold less than 7.65% of our capital stock in the form of Series BB shares, such
shares would be mandatorily converted into Series B shares, which would cause AMP to lose all of its special rights. In addition, shareholders of AMP have allocated among themselves certain veto rights relating to the exercise by AMP of its
veto and other rights, which increases the risk of impasse at the shareholders meeting of AMP and ultimately at our shareholders meetings.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

Our bylaws, the participation agreement and the technical assistance agreement also contain
certain provisions designed to avoid conflicts of interest between AMP and us, such as approval of certain related-party transactions by designated committees.

Our bylaws and certain of the agreements executed in connection with the privatization process prohibited AMP from transferring any of its
Series BB shares before August 25, 2004. Since that date, AMP has been permitted to transfer up to 49% of its Series BB shares without restriction. Since August 25, 2009, AMP has been permitted to sell in any year up to 20% of
its remaining 51% interest in our Series BB shares. Our bylaws provide that, subject to certain exceptions, Series BB shares must be converted into Series B shares prior to transfer.

AMP Shares in Bancomext Trust

As
required under the participation agreement entered into in connection with the Mexican governments sale of our Series BB shares to AMP, AMP has transferred its Series BB shares to a trust, the trustee of which is Banco Nacional de
Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., or Bancomext. For a description of this trust, see Item 7, Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  Major Shareholders  AMP Trust, Bylaws and Stockholders Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the trust, AMP may direct the trustee to vote only shares representing up to 10% of our capital stock. Any
shares in excess of 10% are voted by the trustee in accordance with the vote of the majority of Series B shares. The trust does not affect the veto and other special rights granted to the holders of Series BB shares described above.

Global Offering and Establishment of ADR Facility with New York Stock Exchange Listing

In 1999, 85% of our capital stock was transferred from the Mexican government to a trust established in Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., or
NAFIN, a Mexican government-owned entity. In February 2006, we conducted an initial public offering to allow NAFIN to dispose of its 85% interest in us. Through this offering, all of our outstanding Series B shares were sold to the public
in Mexico, the United States and elsewhere, and NAFIN ceased to be a shareholder. The net proceeds from the sale of shares were remitted entirely to the Mexican government. We received no proceeds from this offering. At the same time, we established
an American Depositary Receipt facility with the Bank of New York Mellon (formerly the Bank of New York) and obtained approval to list our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, we registered our Series B shares with the National
Securities Registry (Registro Nacional de Valores) and listed our Series B shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange.

Master Development
Programs

Under the terms of our concessions, each of our subsidiary concession holders is required to present a Master Development
Program for approval by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation every five years. Each Master Development Program includes investment commitments (including capital expenditures and improvements) applicable to us as concession holder for
the succeeding five-year period. Once approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, these commitments become binding obligations under the terms of our concessions.

In December 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation approved our Master Development Programs for each of our airports for the
2010 to 2014 period. This 5-year program took effect on January 1, 2010 and will be in effect through December 31, 2014. We anticipate negotiating our Master Development Programs for the 2015 to 2019 period during the second and third
quarter of 2014.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

The table below sets forth our historical capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are
calculated on a cash flow basis, meaning that capital expenditures are equal to those investments actually paid for by each airport during a given year and not including investments allocated for by the airport during that year but not paid for
during the given year. The investments shown in the table below therefore reflect our expenditures actually paid for by our airports for the years indicated. In order to be compared with our committed investments for a given year, the investments
made in the previous year but paid for in the given year need to be subtracted while the investments allocated but not paid for in the given year need to be added. For 2011, 2012 and 2013, the total of our investments allocated but unpaid were
Ps. 276.4 million, Ps. 163.6 million and Ps. 135.4 million, respectively. The substantial majority of these investments were made under the terms of our Master Development Programs.

Historical Capital Expenditures by Airport



|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                |  | Year ended December 31, |          
|                |  | 2011                    |           |  | 2012 |     |         | 2013 | 
|                |  | (thousands of pesos)    |          
|Guadalajara     |  | Ps.                     | 223,636   |  |      | Ps. | 198,807 |      |  | Ps. | 299,678 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                         | 224,802   |  |      |     | 81,751  |      |  |     | 65,353  | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                         | 356,923   |  |      |     | 384,284 |      |  |     | 81,399  | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                         | 247,673   |  |      |     | 147,428 |      |  |     | 41,153  | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                         | 48,033    |  |      |     | 31,638  |      |  |     | 5,625   | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                         | 58,371    |  |      |     | 37,834  |      |  |     | 24,607  | 
|La Paz          |  |                         | 17,420    |  |      |     | 14,820  |      |  |     | 47,088  | 
|Mexicali        |  |                         | 11,797    |  |      |     | 9,980   |      |  |     | 11,978  | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                         | 8,922     |  |      |     | 766     |      |  |     | 12,509  | 
|Morelia         |  |                         | 24,301    |  |      |     | 13,551  |      |  |     | 11,873  | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                         | 13,759    |  |      |     | 27,208  |      |  |     | 33,327  | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                         | 10,267    |  |      |     | 18,957  |      |  |     | 44,584  | 
|Other           |  |                         | 9,132     |  |      |     | 11,990  |      |  |     | 7,096   | 
|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|Total           |  | Ps.                     | 1,255,036 |  |      | Ps. | 979,014 |      |  | Ps. | 686,270 | 
|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 

The following table sets forth our historical capital expenditures by type of investment across all of our
airports for the years indicated:

Historical Capital Expenditures by Type



|                        |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                        |  | Year ended December 31, |          
|                        |  | 2011                    |           |  | 2012 |     |         | 2013 | 
|                        |  | (thousands of pesos)    |          
|Terminals               |  | Ps.                     | 501,982   |  |      | Ps. | 549,287 |      |  | Ps. | 302,113 | 
|Runways and aprons      |  |                         | 372,888   |  |      |     | 86,856  |      |  |     | 261,064 | 
|Machinery and equipment |  |                         | 346,846   |  |      |     | 296,626 |      |  |     | 99,765  | 
|Other                   |  |                         | 33,320    |  |      |     | 46,245  |      |  |     | 23,328  | 
|                        |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|Total                   |  | Ps.                     | 1,255,036 |  |      | Ps. | 979,014 |      |  | Ps. | 686,270 | 
|                        |  |                         |           |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 

During 2011, 2012 and 2013, 38.1%, 19.7%, and 17.3%, respectively, of our capital expenditures were funded by
cash flows from operations, while the remaining balance was funded with bank loans. We expect to continue funding the most significant portion of our capital expenditures in the future with new bank loans; however, our ability to incur debt may be
restricted by our existing bank loans. See Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Liquidity and Capital Resources.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2011, 2012 and 2013, we paid Ps. 147.3 million, Ps. 34.1 million, and Ps.
15.9 million, respectively, for the baggage screening equipment using funds placed in a trust for this purpose in 2009. For more information on equipment screening, see Item 4, Business Overview  Regulatory Framework  Scope
of Concession.

Our capital expenditures from 2011, 2012 and 2013 were allocated to the following types of investments at
the majority of our airports:



| |  |  | Terminals. During 2013, we completed and put into operation the expansion of the landing area of the Morelia, Guanajuato and La Paz Airports. In the Los Cabos Airport, we expanded the departure areas, as traffic
growth and commercial expansion exceeded expectations and capacity of the terminal opened in 2012. In the Guadalajara Airport, we began expanding the international departures areas, where new boarding gates will be opened and customs and the
immigration areas will be expanded. We also began adapting the Tijuana terminal for the international cross border bridge.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Runways and aprons. We have completed the renovation of the runways at our Los Mochis and Manzanillo Airports, and we initiated a process of expansion of the aircraft parking platforms in our Guadalajara,
Hermosillo and Los Cabos Airports. In the case of Guadalajara, the construction will be finished in 2014. With this improvement, we will create 20 new aircraft parking positions that can be used to house the new fleet that those airlines that
operate at our Guadalajara Airport will be putting into service.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Machinery and equipment.We invested in machinery and equipment such as fire extinguishing vehicles, emergency back-up electricity generators, metal detectors and other security-related equipment, ambulances,
passenger walkways, air conditioning equipment, equipment for inspecting checked baggage and public information systems.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Other. We installed sewage treatment plants and systems at several of our airports, improved our drainage systems, and installed underground electric wiring systems at several of our airports.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following tables set forth our estimated committed investments for each airport for 2010 through 2014 under our Master Development
Programs. These amounts are based on investment commitments approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Because the amounts are expressed in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007, the figures for investments periods not yet
elapsed are adjusted to take into consideration increases in the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment (Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor, sector construcción,
materiales, alquiler de maquinaria y remuneraciones) since the date of the Ministrys approval of the Master Development Program then in effect. We are required to comply with the investment obligations under these programs on a
year-to-year basis.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Estimated Committed Investments by Airport (2010-2014)



|                |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- |  |  | ---- | ------- |  |  | --- | ------- | 
|                |  | Year ended December 31, |        
|                |  | 2010                    |         |  | 2011 |     |         | 2012 |  |     | 2013    |  |  | 2014 |        
|                |  | (thousands of pesos)(1) |        
|Guadalajara     |  | Ps.                     | 102,144 |  |      | Ps. | 197,050 |      |  | Ps. | 138,683 |  |  | Ps.  | 210,340 |  |  | Ps. | 171,416 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                         | 96,721  |  |      |     | 167,515 |      |  |     | 27,304  |  |  |      | 8,300   |  |  |     | 3,432   | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                         | 151,232 |  |      |     | 342,352 |      |  |     | 192,200 |  |  |      | 38,010  |  |  |     | 30,800  | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                         | 113,328 |  |      |     | 186,583 |      |  |     | 92,500  |  |  |      | 24,200  |  |  |     | 21,800  | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                         | 18,173  |  |      |     | 24,675  |      |  |     | 12,900  |  |  |      | 2,032   |  |  |     | 13,300  | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                         | 13,311  |  |      |     | 35,464  |      |  |     | 37,687  |  |  |      | 6,495   |  |  |     | 3,000   | 
|La Paz          |  |                         | 2,200   |  |      |     | 2,800   |      |  |     | 8,500   |  |  |      | 41,290  |  |  |     | 2,750   | 
|Mexicali        |  |                         | 7,700   |  |      |     | 6,900   |      |  |     | 7,295   |  |  |      | 10,684  |  |  |     | 1,680   | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                         | 6,329   |  |      |     | 4,846   |      |  |     | 1,450   |  |  |      | 7,144   |  |  |     | 550     | 
|Morelia         |  |                         | 14,106  |  |      |     | 10,270  |      |  |     | 13,468  |  |  |      | 2,758   |  |  |     | 634     | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                         | 13,400  |  |      |     | 8,300   |      |  |     | 19,300  |  |  |      | 24,910  |  |  |     | 2,700   | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                         | 15,260  |  |      |     | 2,701   |      |  |     | 10,930  |  |  |      | 35,186  |  |  |     | 1,669   | 
|                |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 
|Total           |  | Ps.                     | 553,904 |  |      | Ps. | 989,456 |      |  | Ps. | 562,217 |  |  | Ps.  | 411,349 |  |  | Ps. | 253,731 | 
|                |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 



|(1) | Figures expressed in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. These amounts are based on investment commitments approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Because the amounts are expressed in
constant pesos as of December 31, 2007, the figures for investments periods not yet elapsed are adjusted to take into consideration increases in the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment
since the date of the Ministrys approval of the Master Development Program then in effect.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following tables set
forth our estimated committed investments for 2010 through 2014 by type of investment:

Estimated Committed Investments by Type
(2010-2014)



|                        |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- |  |  | ---- | ------- |  |  | --- | ------- | 
|                        |  | Year ended December 31, |        
|                        |  | 2010                    |         |  | 2011 |     |         | 2012 |  |     | 2013    |  |  | 2014 |        
|                        |  | (thousands of pesos)(1) |        
|Terminals               |  | Ps.                     | 98,518  |  |      | Ps. | 453,053 |      |  | Ps. | 285,725 |  |  | Ps.  | 164,669 |  |  | Ps. | 101,914 | 
|Runways and aprons      |  |                         | 241,492 |  |      |     | 328,073 |      |  |     | 140,743 |  |  |      | 144,501 |  |  |     | 105,523 | 
|Machinery and equipment |  |                         | 117,655 |  |      |     | 83,700  |      |  |     | 62,630  |  |  |      | 38,902  |  |  |     | 33,225  | 
|Other                   |  |                         | 96,239  |  |      |     | 124,630 |      |  |     | 73,119  |  |  |      | 63,277  |  |  |     | 13,069  | 
|                        |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 
|Total                   |  | Ps.                     | 553,904 |  |      | Ps. | 989,456 |      |  | Ps. | 562,217 |  |  | Ps.  | 411,349 |  |  | Ps. | 253,731 | 
|                        |  |                         |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         |  |  |      |         |  |  |     |         | 



|(1) | Figures expressed in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007. These amounts are based on investment commitments approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Because the amounts are expressed in
constant pesos as of December 31, 2007, the figures for investments periods not yet elapsed are adjusted to take into consideration increases in the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment
since the date of the Ministrys approval of the Master Development Program then in effect.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Differences between
estimated committed investments and historical capital expenditures for 2011, 2012 and 2013 are due primarily to: (i) the capital expenditures made but unpaid during the prior year less the investments made but unpaid during the current year,
(ii) adjustments for inflation (as described above), (iii) advancing and delaying certain committed investments that were approved by the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation in response to needs related to the G20 meeting held in Los Cabos
and iv) investments in the installation of new baggage screening equipment.

We expect to fund the most significant portion of our capital
investments in the short-term and long-term through bank loans. We allocated a majority of our investments for the 20102014 period to our four largest airports. In particular, investments have been, and will continue to be, dedicated to
expanding and remodeling the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Tijuana and Los Cabos international airports.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Operations

We hold
concessions to operate 12 airports, which serve two major metropolitan areas (Guadalajara and Tijuana), several tourist destinations (Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, La Paz and Manzanillo), and a number of mid-sized cities (Hermosillo, Guanajuato,
Morelia, Aguascalientes, Mexicali and Los Mochis). Our airports are located in nine of the 32 Mexican states, covering a territory of approximately 566,000 square kilometers, with a population of approximately 28.2 million according to the
INEGI as of 2010. All of our airports are designated as international airports under Mexican law, meaning that they are all equipped to receive international flights and maintain customs, refueling and immigration services managed by the Mexican
government.

All revenue amounts in this Business Overview section for 2011, 2012 and 2013 include revenues from
improvements to concession assets; however, in some cases we include discussion surrounding only aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues or the sum of both. See the introduction to Item 3, Selected Financial Data, for a
discussion of the reasons for using aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues for certain comparisons. We specifically state when either aeronautical or non-aeronautical revenues are being used. Because aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues
are derived from our business operations, we believe these figures may in some cases be more useful to you because those revenues stem from the key drivers of our business, passenger traffic and our maximum rates.

Our airports handled approximately 20.2 million, 21.3 million and 23.2 million terminal passengers in 2011, 2012 and 2013,
respectively, which we believe places us among the largest private airport operators in the Americas. As of December 31, 2013, five of our airports ranked among the top ten busiest airports in Mexico based on commercial aviation passenger
traffic, according to data published by the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. According to figures of the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency, our commercial aviation passenger traffic accounted for approximately 25.1%, 24.5%
and 24.7% of all arriving and departing commercial aviation passengers in Mexico in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. In 2013, we recorded total revenues of Ps. 5.22 billion, of which Ps. 4.78 billion corresponds to the sum of aeronautical and
non-aeronautical revenues and Ps. 440 million corresponds to the improvements to concession assets, and we recorded net income of Ps. 2.25 billion.

Our airports serve several major international routes, including Guadalajara-Los Angeles, which, in 2013, ranked as the second busiest
international route in Mexico by total number of passengers according to the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation. In addition, our airports serve major resort destinations such as Puerto Vallarta and Los Cabos, which are among the most popular
destinations in Mexico visited by tourists from the United States. Our airports also serve major domestic routes, including Guadalajara-Mexico City, which was the countrys third busiest route in 2013, according to the Mexican Bureau of Civil
Aviation. Other top domestic routes in terms of total passenger traffic include Mexico City-Tijuana and Guadalajara-Tijuana, which ranked fourth and sixth among the busiest domestic routes in Mexico in 2013, according to the Mexican Bureau of Civil
Aviation.

Mexico and the United States are party to a bilateral aviation agreement, which was last amended on December 12, 2005 (the
amendment was published in the Mexican Federal Gazette Diario Oficial de la Federación on July 18, 2006). This amendment increased, from two each to three each, the number of Mexican and U.S. carriers eligible to operate routes
between fourteen cities in Mexico and any U.S. city. The amendment had immediate effect for twelve specified cities in Mexico, including the following cities in which we operate: Manzanillo, Puerto Vallarta and San Jose del Cabo (the site of our Los
Cabos International Airport). The amendment took effect with respect to the cities of Monterrey and Guadalajara on October 27, 2007. We believe that our business has benefited from and will continue to benefit from the amendment to the
bilateral aviation agreement.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

Principal Mexican Airports by Passenger Traffic



|                 |  |                                                     |          | 
|---------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- | -------- | 
|Airport          |  | 2013 CommercialAviation Passengers(1)(in thousands) |         
|Mexico City      |  |                                                     | 31,532.3 | 
|Cancun           |  |                                                     | 15,983.1 | 
|Guadalajara*     |  |                                                     | 8,148.5  | 
|Monterrey        |  |                                                     | 6,417.8  | 
|Tijuana*         |  |                                                     | 4,269.5  | 
|Los Cabos*       |  |                                                     | 3,387.7  | 
|Puerto Vallarta* |  |                                                     | 2,671.2  | 
|Hermosillo*      |  |                                                     | 1,329.9  | 
|Merida           |  |                                                     | 1,323.5  | 
|Culiacan         |  |                                                     | 1,252.2  | 



|* | Indicates airports operated by us.
|- | ----------------------------------

|(1) | Excluding general aviation passengers.
|--- | --------------------------------------

Source: Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency and company data.

Guadalajara and Tijuana are among Mexicos most important manufacturing, industrial and commercial centers. Both cities have
significantmaquiladoraindustries. Amaquiladoraplant is a manufacturing facility to which mostly raw materials are imported and from which finished products are exported, with the manufacturer paying tariffs only on the value added
in Mexico. Maquiladoraplants were originally concentrated along the Mexico-U.S. border, but more recently have moved farther south in order to access lower labor costs and a larger and more diverse labor pool, and to take greater advantage
of certain inputs available from Mexican suppliers. In 2013, our Guadalajara International Airport and our Tijuana International Airport were Mexicos third and fifth busiest airports, respectively, in terms of passenger traffic according to
the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, our Guadalajara International Airport and Tijuana International Airport together represented approximately 53.0%, 52.6% and 53.6%, respectively, of our terminal passenger
traffic and 46.7%, 47.4% and 50.3% of our total revenues, respectively (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, they represented 50.2%, 49.4% and 49.7%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Four of our airports, Los Cabos International Airport, Puerto Vallarta International Airport, La Paz International Airport and Manzanillo
International Airport, serve popular Mexican tourist destinations. Of these tourist destinations, Puerto Vallarta and Los Cabos are the largest, with Puerto Vallarta constituting Mexicos third largest international tourist destination and Los
Cabos the second in terms of visitors in 2013, according to the Mexican National Institute of Migration (Instituto Nacional de Migración, or INM). Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta attracted approximately 3.4 million and
2.7 million terminal passengers, respectively, in 2013. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, our Los Cabos International Airport and Puerto Vallarta International Airport together represented 26.4%, for each of 2011 and 2012, and 26.1%, for 2013, of our
terminal passengers and 36.8%, 34.1% and 30.7%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, they represented 31.8%, 32.5% and 32.7%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Mexico is one of the main tourist destinations in the world. Mexico has historically ranked in the top ten countries worldwide in terms of
foreign visitors, with 23.7 million international tourists in 2013, according to the Mexican Ministry of Tourism. The tourism industry is one of the largest generators of foreign exchange in the Mexican economy. Within Mexico, the region
bordering the Pacific Ocean (where several of our airports are located) is a principal tourist destination due to its beaches and cultural and archeological sites, which are served by numerous hotels and resorts.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

The remaining six airports in our group serve mid-sized citiesHermosillo, Leon, Morelia,
Aguascalientes, Mexicali and Los Mochiswith diverse economic activities. These cities are industrial centers (Hermosillo, Leon, Aguascalientes and Mexicali) and/or serve as the hubs for important agricultural regions (Leon, Morelia and Los
Mochis). In 2013, our six airports serving mid-sized cities accounted for approximately 16.8% of our terminal passenger traffic and 14.5% of our total revenues (14.5% of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues). In 2011 and 2012,
our six airports serving mid-sized cities accounted for approximately 17.1% and 17.6% of our terminal passenger traffic and 13.8% and 15.4% of our total revenues, respectively (14.8% and 17.4% of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical
revenues). Of these six airports, Hermosillo has the greatest passenger traffic volume. In 2013, Hermosillo accounted for approximately 5.7% of our terminal passenger traffic and 4.1% of our total revenues (4.5% of the sum of aeronautical and
non-aeronautical revenues). In 2011 and 2012, Hermosillo accounted for approximately 5.9% and 6.1% of our terminal passenger traffic and 4.2% and 4.3% of our total revenues, respectively (4.5% and 4.6% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical
revenues).

Our Sources of Revenues

Aeronautical Services

Aeronautical
services represent the most significant source of our revenues. In 2011, 2012 and 2013 aeronautical services revenues represented approximately 62.3%, 68.1% and 69.2%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, aeronautical
services represented 78.9%, 76.9% and 75.5%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues). All of our revenues from aeronautical services are regulated under the maximum-rate price regulation system applicable to our
airports.

Our aeronautical services revenues are principally dependent on the following factors: passenger traffic volume, the number of
air traffic movements, the weight of the aircraft, the duration of an aircrafts stay at the airport and the time of day the aircraft operates at the airport.

Passenger Charges

We collect a passenger
charge for each departing passenger on an aircraft (other than diplomats, infants and transit and transfer passengers, if the transfer of the passenger occurs within 24 hours of the passengers arrival at the airport). We do not collect
passenger charges from arriving passengers. Passenger charges are automatically included in the cost of a passengers ticket, and we issue invoices for those charges to each airline on a weekly basis and record an account receivable for the
invoice corresponding to a flight during the actual month of the flight.

Before the opening of Mexicos airports to private
investment, all airports in Mexico had entered into agreements with national and foreign airlines under which the airlines were obligated to collect all passenger charges on behalf of the airports in exchange for being given a period of time in
which to reimburse those passenger charges to the airports. The length of the reimbursement period was tied to the interest rate on short-term Mexican Treasury Bills, or Cetes, in order to allow airlines to accumulate interest
that would compensate them for the costs they incurred in collecting those passenger charges.

During 2009, we renegotiated our passenger
charges collection agreements with all of our airline customers. By November 2009 we had reached agreements with all of our airline customers. Under the new agreements, airlines requesting payment period extensions are obligated to:
(i) reimburse passenger charges collected on behalf of our airports during a period no greater than 60 days (depending on each airline) after the operational average date (no longer than the invoice date) for such charges; and
(ii) provide cash, bonds, standby letters of credit or other similar instruments as a guarantee for passenger



39



---

##### Table of Contents

charges in an amount equal to the highest passenger charges received by the airline on an airport by airport basis for the previous year during a period of time equal to the requested payment
period plus 30 additional days. Each airline with a payment grace period is obligated to maintain the guarantee at an agreed-upon level, and if it does not do so, must reimburse the passenger charges on the day the applicable flight departs from our
airports without any grace period. If the airline pays our airports on time, the airport is obligated to give the airline an allowance of 3% of the value of each invoice billed no later than 7 days after the payment date. The airline can then apply
this allowance to cover airport services, leases for ticket counters and back-office and passenger charges. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, under the new agreement we received payments within an average period of 65, 57 and 59 days, respectively.

In February 2010, we signed an agreement with the Mexican Air Transportation Chamber that allowed a 10.1% increase in the passenger charges
rate for 2010 and an increase in the rest of our specific tariffs equal to the average increases of the Mexican Consumer Price Index and the Mexican Producer Price Index excluding petroleum published by the Mexican National Institute for Statistics
and Geography (INEGI) for 2010. In March 2012, we signed a new agreement for the 20122014 period, which maintained essentially these same terms and conditions as contained in the previous contract. During April 2013, we published our rate for
passenger charges and specific tariffs for 2013, which increased by an average of 2.25% as compared to 5.5% for 2012.

On
December 30, 2009, the new maximum tariffs for our airports for the 2010-2014 five-year period were published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (Diario Oficial de la Federación). The combined maximum tariffs are expressed
in workload units for each airport and were determined based on: (i) projected workload units (whereby each workload unit is equivalent to one passenger, or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo, including those transported in passenger
airplanes), (ii) the capital investments and (iii) the operating expenses included in the Master Development Program authorized for the 2010-2014 period. The maximum tariffs for the 2010-2014 period (as published in December 2009) are
expressed in pesos as of December 31, 2007 and are adjusted by the level of inflation according to the Producer Price Index excluding petroleum and by the efficiency factor at the end of any given year within the 2010-2014 period. Since the
inflation for each applicable year as measured in terms of the variation of the Producer Price Index excluding petroleum is not known at the beginning of the application of the maximum tariffs negotiated with the DGAC, the adjustment for inflation
is not included in the maximum rates as set at the beginning of each five-year period.

Although the Ministry of Communications and
Transportation may in some cases authorize an increase in our maximum rates, we must negotiate with our principal airline customers the specific rates applicable to each aeronautical activity. As a result, we are not always able to increase prices
up to the amount of maximum rates.

International passenger charges are currently dollar-denominated, but are invoiced and collected in
pesos based on the average exchange rate during the month prior to the flight. Domestic passenger charges are peso-denominated. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, passenger charges represented approximately 83.1% (domestic passenger charges represented 45.7%
and international passenger charges represented 37.4%), 83.9% (domestic passenger charges represented 45.8% and international passenger charges represented 38.1%) and 85.0% (domestic passenger charges represented 47.2% and international passenger
charges represented 37.8%), respectively, of our aeronautical services revenues and approximately 51.8% (domestic passenger charges represented 28.5% and international passenger charges represented 23.3%), 57.1% (domestic passenger charges
represented 31.2% and international passenger charges represented 25.9%) and 58.8% (domestic passenger charges represented 32.6% and international passenger charges represented 26.2%), respectively, of our total revenues. In 2011, 2012 and 2013,
passenger charges represented 65.5% (domestic passenger charges represented 36.0% and international passenger charges represented 29.5%) , 64.5% (domestic passenger charges represented 35.2% and international passenger charges represented 29.3%) and
64.2% (domestic passenger charges represented



40



---

##### Table of Contents

35.6% and international passenger charges represented 28.6%), respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. Passenger charges vary at each of our airports and depending
on whether the destination is national or international. Because passenger charges for international flights are denominated in U.S. dollars, the value of our revenues from those charges is therefore affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S.
dollar as compared to the peso.

Aircraft Landing Charges

We collect landing charges from carriers for their use of our runways, illumination systems on the runways and other visual landing assistance
services. Our landing charges are different for each of our airports and are based on each landing aircrafts weight (determined as an average of the aircrafts weight without fuel and maximum takeoff weight), the time of the landing, the
origin of the flight and the nationality of the airline or client. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, aircraft landing charges represented approximately 5.1%, 5.1% and 4.9%, respectively, of our aeronautical revenues and 3.2%, 3.5% and 3.4%, respectively, of
our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, aircraft landing charges represented 4.0%, 3.9% and 3.7%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Aircraft Parking Charges

We collect
various charges from carriers for the use of our facilities by their aircraft and passengers after landing. We collect aircraft parking charges for aircraft that are loading and unloading passengers or cargo as well as for long-term aircraft parking
that does not involve the loading or unloading of passengers or cargo. Aircraft parking charges that involve loading and unloading passengers or cargo vary based on the time of day or night that the relevant service is provided (with higher fees
generally charged during peak usage periods and at night), the aircrafts maximum takeoff weight, the origin and destination of the flight and the nationality of the airline or client, while charges for long-term parking vary based on the time
of day or night the aircraft is parked at our facilities, the length of time the aircraft is parked at our facilities and the nationality of the airline or client. We collect aircraft parking charges the entire time an aircraft is on our aprons.
During 2011, 2012 and 2013 these charges represented 4.7%, 4.6% and 4.4%, respectively, of our aeronautical revenues and 2.9%, 3.1% and 3.1%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, aircraft parking charges
represented 3.7%, 3.5% and 3.3%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Passenger Walkway Charges

Airlines are also assessed charges for the connection of their aircraft to our terminals through a passenger walkway and for the transportation
of passengers between terminals and aircraft via mini-buses and other vehicles. Charges for use of passenger walkways are based on each unit or service rendered, which are limited to a period of 30 minutes each, but charges for the transportation of
customers between terminals and aircraft via mini-buses and other vehicles are determined based on the number of trips taken between the terminal and the aircraft. Passenger walkways are only available at our Guadalajara, Tijuana, Puerto Vallarta
and Guanajuato international airports. During 2011 and 2012 these charges represented approximately 0.8%, 0.7%, respectively, of our aeronautical services revenues and approximately 0.5%, and 0.5%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011 and
2012, charges for the use of passenger walkways represented 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues). Beginning in November 2012, operation of our passenger walkways and our airbuses, which had
previously been provided by us, began being provided by an independent third party. This third party also maintains the relationships with the airlines for their use of this equipment. Therefore, we no longer receive revenues for this service;
instead, as of November 2012, we receive only revenues associated with the energy use of the walkways and a per-unit fee for the use of the walkways. In 2013, the first full year in which we received this recovery of costs revenue, it was equal to
Ps. 2.8 million or 0.1% of our total revenues (0.1% of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).



41



---

##### Table of Contents

Airport Security Charges

We also assess an airport security charge, which is collected from each airline, based on the number of its departing terminal passengers
(excluding infants, diplomats and transit passengers), for use of our x-ray equipment, metal detectors and other security equipment and personnel. These charges are based on the time of day the services are used, the number of departing passengers
and the destination of the flight. We provide airport security services at our airports directly. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, these charges represented approximately 1.3%, 1.3% and 1.4%, respectively, of our aeronautical services revenues and
approximately 0.8%, 0.9% and 0.9%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, security charges represented 1.0%, 1.0% and 1.0%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

The Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation, Mexicos federal authority on aviation, and the Ministry of Public Security
(Secretaría de Seguridad Pública) issue guidelines for airport security in Mexico. In response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, we took additional steps to increase security at our airports.
At the request of the Federal Aviation Authority of the United States, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation issued directives in October 2001 establishing new rules and procedures to be adopted at our airports. Under these directives, these
rules and procedures were implemented immediately and for an indefinite period of time.

Additional regulations by the Mexican
Bureau of Civil Aviation issued in 2011 established rules and procedures for the inspection of carry-on baggage. To fulfill these requirements, we improved our security by providing new training and operating procedures, adding new equipment and
security personnel, most of them from third party providers, in addition to increasing our coordination with other airports and airlines. However, as security is a primary concern in our industry, the possibility of new threats may require frequent
updates to the security measures at our airports.

Complementary Services

At each of our airports, we earn revenues from charging access and other fees to third-party providers of baggage handling services, catering
services, aircraft maintenance and repair services and fuel services. These fees are included in the revenues that are regulated under our maximum-rate price regulation system and are determined for each third-party service provider based on a
percentage of its total revenues. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, revenues from complementary service fees represented approximately 1.7%, 1.6% and 1.6%, respectively, of our aeronautical revenues services, and approximately 1.1%, 1.1% and 1.1%,
respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, revenues from complementary service fees represented 1.4%, 1.2% and 1.2%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

We currently maintain contracts with 32 companies that provide the majority of these complementary services at our 12 airports.

Under the Mexican Airport Law, we are required to provide complementary services at each of our airports if there are no third parties
providing such services. For example, Menzies Aviation México, S.A. de C.V. currently provides the majority of the baggage handling services at our airports. If the third parties currently providing these services ceased to do so, we would be
required to provide these services or find other third parties to provide such services.

The Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services
Agency (Aeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares) maintains an exclusive contract to sell fuel at all of our airports, and we charge the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency a nominal access fee. The Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services
Agency in turn is required to purchase all of its fuel from Petróleos Mexicanos, or Pemex. In the event that the Mexican government privatizes fuel supply activities in the future, the terms of our concessions provide that it will do
so through a competitive bidding process.



42



---

##### Table of Contents

Leasing of Space to Airlines

In addition, we receive regulated revenues from leasing to airlines space in our airports that is necessary for their operations, such as
ticket counters, monitors and back offices. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, leasing of space to airlines represented approximately 3.3%, 2.9% and 1.9%, respectively, of our aeronautical revenues services, and approximately 2.0%, 2.0% and 1.3%, respectively,
of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, revenues from leasing of space to airlines represented 2.6%, 2.2% and 1.4%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

Cargo Handling

In 2013, our 12 airports
handled approximately 166.9 thousand metric tons of cargo. Guadalajara International Airport represents the most significant portion of our cargo volume, accounting for approximately 78.1% of the cargo handled by our 12 airports in 2013,
compared to 79.8% and 78.9% of the cargo handled by our 12 airports in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Increases in our cargo volume are beneficial to us for purposes of maximum rate calculations, as cargo increases the number of our workload units.

Cargo-related revenues include revenues from the leasing of space in our airports to handling agents and shippers, landing fees for each
arriving aircraft carrying cargo and a portion of the revenues derived from other complementary services for each workload unit of cargo. Cargo-related revenues are largely regulated and therefore subject to maximum rates applicable to regulated
revenues sources.

Revenues from cargo handling in our airports historically have represented a negligible portion of our total revenues,
but we believe that Mexico has significant potential for growth in the volume of cargo transported by air. A substantial portion of cargo originating in the United States and destined for Latin America is currently handled in the Miami and Los
Angeles international airports, and we believe that a portion of this cargo could instead be routed more efficiently through our Guadalajara International Airport or our Tijuana International Airport.

Permanent Ground Transportation

We
receive revenues from ground transportation vehicles and taxi companies who pay an access fee to operate on our airports premises. Our revenues from providers of ground transportation services deemed permanent under applicable
Mexican law, such as access fees charged to taxis, are subject to price regulation.

Non-aeronautical Services

General

Non-aeronautical services
historically have generated a significantly smaller portion of our revenues as compared to aeronautical services, although the contribution to the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues from non-aeronautical services has increased in
recent years from approximately 21.1% in 2011 to approximately 23.1% in 2012, and approximately 24.5% in 2013. We estimate that this contribution will continue to increase because we continue to expand commercial spaces inside our terminals and
develop new commercial strategies. We are also focusing on developing commercial spaces outside of our terminal buildings and will continue the expansion of businesses operated directly by us, such as advertising, VIP lounges and convenience stores
in our airports. Our revenues from non-aeronautical services are principally derived from commercial activities.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

None of our revenues from non-aeronautical services are regulated under our maximum-rate price
regulation system.

Revenues from Commercial Activities

Leading privatized airports generally generate an important portion of their revenues from commercial activities. An airports revenues
from commercial activities are largely dependent on passenger traffic, its passengers level of spending, terminal design, the mix of commercial tenants and the basis of fees charged to businesses operating in the airport. Revenues from
commercial activities also depend substantially on the percentage of traffic represented by international passengers, who tend to spend greater amounts at our airports, particularly on duty-free items.

We currently have the following types of commercial activities in each of our airports:



| |  |  | Leasing of space Revenues that we derive from the leasing of space in our terminals to airlines and complementary service providers for certain non-essential activities such as first class/VIP lounges are
not subject to price regulation under our maximum rates and are classified by us as non-aeronautical commercial activities. Examples of these first class/VIP lounges as operated by third parties include Banamex Salón Beyond, American Express
and Aeroméxicos Club Premier in the Guadalajara Airport, in addition to Aeromars Club Diamante in the Aguascalientes and Manzanillo Airports.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Retail stores In recent years we have completed renovation projects to improve the product mix of retail stores in the commercial areas at our Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Hermosillo,
Guanajuato, Tijuana, Manzanillo, Morelia and La Paz international airports. We will continue developing more specialized retail space in order to attract more customers.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Food and beverage services In recent years we have completed clean up projects with respect to our restaurant and bar leases, allowing us to introduce several providers with more brand
recognition likely to increase consumer traffic in our commercial areas.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Car rentals We have recently remodeled the areas used by car rental agencies to which we lease space at our airports and have sought to bring in a greater percentage of internationally known name-brand car
rental providers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Time-share marketing and sales We receive revenues from time-share developers to which we rent space in our airports for the purpose of marketing and sales of time-share units.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Duty-free stores We currently have duty-free stores at four of our 12 airports. These stores are most lucrative at our Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara airports, where we have a greater number of
international passengers. In June 2009, a 10-year lease for a fixed-rent duty-free store at Terminal 2 in Los Cabos ended. This allowed us to renegotiate the contract and obtain a royalty-fee contract. All of the duty-free stores located in our
airports are now on leases under which rent is based on a royalty fee. In November 2012, we secured our most lucrative contract thus far, in relation to Terminal 2 of the Los Cabos airport, as a result of an international bidding process. In the
last quarter of 2012, we also renegotiated the duty-free contract for the Puerto Vallarta airport and obtained a better royalty-fee contract.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



44



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Communications We have consolidated all of the telephone and internet service at our airports with one provider. All of our airports offer wireless internet service. Fixed line telephone services have
reached maturity and are now starting to decline due to the increasing prevalence of mobile phones. However, there has been an increase in the demand for space outside our terminals to install cellular antennas in order to improve the level of
service offered to our passengers.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Financial services In recent years we have expanded and modernized the spaces we lease to financial services providers such as currency exchange bureaus and have additionally improved our contracts with
several of the financial services providers at our airports to reflect a percentage of the revenues recorded by those providers rather than fixed yearly fees.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Ground transportation Our revenues from providers of ground transportation services deemed non-permanent under applicable Mexican law, such as access fees charged to charter buses, are not
subject to price regulation under our maximum rates and are classified by us as non-aeronautical commercial activities.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Businesses operated directly:



| |  |  | Parking facilities We directly operate the car parking facilities at all of our airports. Our main car parking facilities are at the Guadalajara International Airport and Tijuana International Airport,
which together represented 76.6% of our total revenues from car parking services in 2013, and represented 48.2% of our non-aeronautical revenues from those airports. Revenues from parking facilities are directly correlated to passenger traffic at
our airports. Currently, parking facilities are not regulated under our maximum rates, although they could become regulated upon a finding by the Mexican Antitrust Commission (Comisión Federal de Competencia) that at some airports,
there are no competing alternatives for such parking.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Advertising Since May 2011, we have been directly operating the advertising at all of our airports. Due to this new strategy, our revenues from advertising increased 62% from 2011 to 2013. We estimate that
this income will continue to increase because most advertisers have preferred to rent spaces directly in the airport and the new strategies focus on the optimization of the existing advertising areas.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | VIP Lounges We opened our first directly operated VIP lounges in Terminal 1 during the last quarter of 2011, and in Terminal 2 of the Los Cabos airport in 2012. During 2012, we began operations of similar
lounges at the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta and Hermosillo airports, and in 2013 we opened another lounge in the Tijuana airport. We estimate that in the second half of 2014, we will begin operation of Guadalajaras new VIP lounge located in
Domestic Departures and will also increase by 53% the capacity of the current Guadalajara International Departures VIP lounge.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Convenience stores Whereas our conveniences stores were previously managed by third parties, in April 2012, we began our own operation of a convenience store at the Aguascalientes airport, in which we sell
magazines, soft drinks, candy and groceries, among other items, directly to our passengers; subsequently, during the last quarter of 2012, we opened another two stores in Terminal 2 of the Los Cabos airport, one in the departures area and one in the
check-in counters area. Due to strong performance at the Aguascalientes airport, we opened a second store in the departures area in October 2013. During 2014, we expect to open another ten convenience stores in the Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta,
Guanajuato, Hermosillo and La Paz airports.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



45



---

##### Table of Contents

Domestic passengers represented approximately 66.3% of our terminal passenger traffic in 2013. In
addition, we estimate that a significant minority of our international passengers are lower-income Mexicans traveling to or from the United States. Based on surveys and studies to understand the consumption habits of our passengers completed during
2012 and 2013 at the Guadalajara International Airport, we believe that the spending habits of these Mexican international passengers are more similar to the spending habits of our domestic passengers, who generally purchase fewer products than
other international passengers. However, in order to increase the consumer spending of this demographic, we have been increasing the brand recognition of commercial spaces and the products they offer; which according to the surveys and studies we
believe is likely to contribute to increased consumption among our domestic passengers and our Mexican international passengers. In part as a result of the implementation of these strategies, consumer spending per passenger in our airports increased
by 12.9% for 2013, as compared with 2012.

Recovery of Costs from Checked Baggage Screening

In 2005, the Mexican government issued a policy letter (carta de política) calling for all checked baggage on all commercial
flights to undergo a new comprehensive screening process. The new screening process required the installation of dedicated screening equipment and the manual inspection of baggage if such equipment signals the potential presence of prohibited items.
During 2011, we completed the installation of new screening equipment at all 12 of our airports. The operation of this equipment is the responsibility of our airline customers under the Mexican Airport Law. Because the Mexican Airport Law expressly
provides that airlines bear the responsibility for checked baggage screening, if an airline wants us to operate the baggage screening system for them, they must enter into a contract with us that allows us to recover the cost of operating the
equipment. However, because of uncertainty over the policy letters implementation, the new screening process had been initially delayed. Although, as stated, the Mexican Airport Law expressly provides that airlines bear the responsibility for
baggage screening, the fact that the policy letter is silent as to responsibility caused some of our airline customers to contend that the policy letters intent is for airport concessionaires, such as us, to bear responsibility for the new
screening process. In addition, certain questions have been raised regarding the constitutionality of the new screening process. Since the issuance of the policy letter, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation has been expected to issue implementing
regulations. On November 23, 2012, the Mexican Bureau of Civil Aviation (Dirección General de Aeronáutica Civil, or DGAC) published a recommendation, titled a Circular Obligatoria, on
the Ministry of Communications and Transportation website that, instead of modifying the legal responsibilities set forth in the Mexican Airport Law, attempted to facilitate contracts between parties by clarifying certain issues regarding the
allocation of responsibility that had been raised. These recommendations are not binding and would have no legal effect unless incorporated into a valid contract.

We currently have agreements to operate baggage screening systems with the following airlines: Magnicharters, Westjet, Airtransat, Sunwing,
Jazz, Delta, AirTran, Alaska, Virgin, Frontier, American Airlines, Sun Country, U.S. Airways, United Airlines, Spirit, Aerocalafia, Aeroméxico, Interjet and Volaris. Under these agreements, these airlines agree to hold harmless and indemnify
us against certain types of liability that might arise in connection with the operation of the baggage screening system, in accordance with the provisions of the Mexican Airport Law. At the end of 2013, 92.8% of the passengers travelling through our
airports were using the checked baggage system. We expect to sign agreements with our remaining airline customers during 2014 on substantially the same terms and conditions as those already signed.

The checked baggage screening equipment has been operational in our 10 busiest airports since 2011; only the Aguascalientes and Los Mochis
airports continue to have solely manual inspection equipment.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

We are incurring ongoing expenses to maintain and operate this equipment. Currently, the
operational costs of the screening system has been limited to the level necessary to provide the required services to airlines, and we expect to continue recovering those costs, which could increase if more airlines sign a contract to use our
equipment. We also expect to incur ongoing expenses to maintain any equipment purchased, and we could be required to undertake significant additional capital expenditures for items such as a new screening technology or additional equipment if
screening guidelines are expanded further and require that additional steps be taken to comply with the requirements.

Recent Expansion and Development
of Commercial Areas

We believe that leading privatized airports typically generate a greater portion of their revenues from commercial
activities than we currently do, at a range of approximately 30% to 40%. In 2013, revenues from non-aeronautical services in our airports accounted for 23.1% of our total revenues. Revenues from non-aeronautical services in our airports represent
24.4% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues of our airports. As this is a primary component of our business strategy, we have focused on increasing our revenues from commercial activities in our airports by:

 Redesigning and expanding the space available in our airport terminals allocated to commercial activities.

In order to increase our revenues from commercial activities, we have focused on expanding and redesigning the layout of certain terminals in
our airports to allow for the inclusion of more commercial businesses, as well as to redirect the flow of passengers through our airports, increasing their exposure to the commercial areas of our airports.

During 2011, we added a new food court area at the Guadalajara International Airport. This project created an additional 200 square meters of
commercial space. On November 1, 2012, Terminal 2 at the Los Cabos airport began operations with 900 square meters of commercial areas, which include 500 square meters for a central restaurant, 70 square meters for a cafeteria and 330
square meters for various retail stores (including a convenience store directly operated by us); additionally, there is a 500-square meter VIP Lounge.

On October, 2013, we added 576 square meters of commercial areas to Terminal 2 at the Los Cabos airport. This new commercial space began
operations on December 12, 2013.

Finally, in the last quarter of 2012, we renegotiated the duty-free contract at our Puerto Vallarta
airport; this allowed us to redesign the store. In the last quarter of 2013, we built a passenger walkway through the duty-free store, leading passengers through the store on their way to the boarding gates.

 Renegotiating agreements with terminal tenants to be more consistent with market practices.

We have also continued improving our lease arrangements with existing tenants through the usage of royalty-based lease contracts, whereby
lease amounts are based on tenants revenues, subject to minimum fixed amounts related to the square footage. We estimate that approximately 97% of current commercial revenues could be arranged as royalty-based contracts based on the nature of
our tenants operations. Approximately 98.5% of the contracts that could be arranged as royalty-based have already been executed under those conditions.

 Recovering the rights to several retail and car parking businesses at our airports previously operated by third parties.



47



---

##### Table of Contents

Prior to 1999, our predecessor entered into several contracts with third-party operators to
develop new space and modernize existing space at our 12 airports.

We acquired our concessions from our predecessor subject to these
long-term lease obligations and have sought to recover the third parties lease rights. In prior years we recovered, by compensating leaseholders for early termination of their leases, several significant leases previously held by third parties
who managed our commercial areas and received all revenues from the operations in those areas, in addition to the car parking infrastructure in our airports.

As of today, the only material commercial activity at our airports that remains subject to a third-party lease under which we receive only
nominal revenue is the hotel at Guadalajara International Airport. A third party, Coco Club Hoteles y Morandas de México, S.A. de C.V. (Coco Club), was granted the right by the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency to
operate the hotel at our Guadalajara International Airport. Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, and only if those specific conditions were satisfied, Coco Club had the right to renew the contract and continue operating the hotel for
another 15-year period starting in March 2008 at below-market rents. Because we did not believe that Coco Club satisfied all such conditions, we did not renew the lease in 2008. However, Coco Club maintained possession of the hotel. As a
consequence, in April 2008 we initiated legal proceedings against Coco Club to regain possession of the hotel due to Coco Clubs failure to satisfy all conditions in the prior lease agreement. On October 31, 2011, we received a favorable
decision ordering the return of the hotel. The decision was appealed by Coco Club on December 14, 2011. On October 19, 2012, the court ordered the eviction of Coco Club and instructed the airport to take possession of the hotel. During
2013, there were no developments in the process; thus, in 2014 we anticipate that we will initiate further legal actions in order to enforce the court-order and repossess the hotel.

In the last quarter of 2013, the lease agreements of seven convenience stores at the Hermosillo, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos and Guanajuato
airports expired. Upon the expiration of the leases, we successfully took possession of the space from these tenants, after which we either managed the businesses directly or repurposed the space in the context of further terminal expansion.

Marketing Activities

We focus our
marketing activities, with respect to aeronautical services, on participation in business conferences organized by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), among others, including the annual Schedules and
Commercial Strategy conferences. These conferences provide a forum for the exchange of information relating to airlines decisions about changes in routes and flights. To lease properties and obtain related non-aeronautical services
revenues, we principally rely on advertising through traditional local distribution channels, including newspapers.

Recognition of revenues from
improvements to concession assets

IFRIC 12 requires, subject to certain conditions, that the infrastructure of a service concession
contract falling within its scope not be recognized as property, plant and equipment. It also requires that revenues obtained when the operator performs both construction or upgrade services and operating services under a single contract be
recognized according to each type of service provided, based on the fair value of consideration received at the time the service is rendered. We recognize revenues and the associated costs of improvements to concession assets that it is obligated to
perform at the airports as established by the Master Development Programs. Revenues represent the value of the exchange between ourselves and the government with respect to the improvements, given that we construct or provide improvements to the
airports as obligated under the Master Development Programs, and in exchange, the government grants us the right to obtain benefits for services provided using those assets, which are recognized as intangible assets. We have determined that our
obligations per the Master Development



48



---

##### Table of Contents

Programs should be considered to be a revenue-earning activity as all expenditures incurred to fulfill the Master Development Programs are included in the maximum tariff we charge our customers.
Therefore we recognize the revenue and expense in profit or loss when the expenditures are performed. The cost for such additions and improvements to concession assets is based on actual costs incurred by us in the execution of the additions or
improvements, considering the investment requirements in the Master Development Programs. Through bidding processes, we contract third parties to carry out such construction. The amount of revenues for these services is equal to the amount of costs
incurred, as we do not obtain any profit margin for these construction services. The amounts paid are set at market value. As a result, revenues from improvements to concession assets do not have a cash impact on our results. Furthermore, they are
not directly related to our passenger traffic, which is the main driver of our revenues.

Our Airports

In 2013, our airports served a total of approximately 23.2 million terminal passengers. In 2013, our two principal airports that serve
important metropolitan areas, Guadalajara International Airport and Tijuana International Airport, together represented approximately 53.6% of our total terminal passenger traffic. Puerto Vallarta International Airport and Los Cabos International
Airport, our main airports serving popular tourist destinations, together accounted for approximately 26.1% of our total terminal passenger traffic in 2013. Hermosillo International Airport, which is our largest airport serving a mid-sized city,
accounted for approximately 5.7% of our total terminal passenger traffic in 2013.

All of our airports are designated as international
airports under applicable Mexican law, meaning that they are equipped to receive international flights and maintain customs and immigration facilities operated by the Mexican government.

The following table shows the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues for each of the airports for the years indicated.

Sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues by airport



|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | 
|                |  | Year ended December 31, |          
|                |  | 2011                    |           |  | 2012 |     |           | 2013 | 
|                |  | (thousands of Pesos)    |          
|Guadalajara     |  | Ps.                     | 1,428,342 |  |      | Ps. | 1,561,107 |      |  | Ps. | 1,696,508 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                         | 529,248   |  |      |     | 599,831   |      |  |     | 682,722   | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                         | 676,490   |  |      |     | 811,929   |      |  |     | 939,553   | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                         | 566,114   |  |      |     | 611,314   |      |  |     | 626,929   | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                         | 175,954   |  |      |     | 200,522   |      |  |     | 213,970   | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                         | 166,998   |  |      |     | 191,755   |      |  |     | 203,818   | 
|La Paz          |  |                         | 95,326    |  |      |     | 100,947   |      |  |     | 109,652   | 
|Mexicali        |  |                         | 75,523    |  |      |     | 82,652    |      |  |     | 77,832    | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                         | 56,255    |  |      |     | 70,311    |      |  |     | 81,421    | 
|Morelia         |  |                         | 71,703    |  |      |     | 82,178    |      |  |     | 84,948    | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                         | 32,025    |  |      |     | 29,952    |      |  |     | 32,181    | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                         | 28,529    |  |      |     | 31,936    |      |  |     | 37,574    | 
|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total           |  | Ps.                     | 3,902,507 |  |      | Ps. | 4,374,434 |      |  | Ps. | 4,787,108 | 
|                |  |                         |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 



49



---

##### Table of Contents

The following tables set forth the passenger traffic volume for each of our airports for the
years indicated:

Passenger Traffic

Year Ended December 31,



|                               |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|------------------------------ |  | ----------- | ---------- |  | ------------- |  | --------- | ----- |  |  | ----------- |  |  | ------------- | ---------- |  | ----- |  | --------- | ----------- |  |  | ------------- |  |  | ----- | ---------- |  |  |  | --------- |  |  |  | ---------- | 
|                               |  | 2011        |            |  | 2012          |  |           | 2013  | 
|                               |  | Terminal(1) |            |  | Transit(2)    |  |           | Total |  |  | Terminal(1) |  |  | Transit(2)    |            |  | Total |  |           | Terminal(1) |  |  | Transit(2)    |  |  | Total |           
|Total Passengers:              |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Guadalajara                    |  |             | 7,201,669  |  |               |  | 48,926    |       |  |  | 7,250,595   |  |  |               | 7,436,352  |  |       |  | 38,952    |             |  |  | 7,475,304     |  |  |       | 8,148,485  |  |  |  | 30,195    |  |  |  | 8,178,680  | 
|Tijuana                        |  |             | 3,500,767  |  |               |  | 42,218    |       |  |  | 3,542,985   |  |  |               | 3,759,773  |  |       |  | 55,658    |             |  |  | 3,815,431     |  |  |       | 4,269,524  |  |  |  | 54,855    |  |  |  | 4,324,379  | 
|Los Cabos                      |  |             | 2,806,977  |  |               |  | 15,204    |       |  |  | 2,822,181   |  |  |               | 3,018,516  |  |       |  | 1,379     |             |  |  | 3,019,895     |  |  |       | 3,387,705  |  |  |  | 656       |  |  |  | 3,388,361  | 
|Puerto Vallarta                |  |             | 2,535,876  |  |               |  | 10,181    |       |  |  | 2,546,057   |  |  |               | 2,597,685  |  |       |  | 5,556     |             |  |  | 2,603,241     |  |  |       | 2,671,235  |  |  |  | 5,160     |  |  |  | 2,676,395  | 
|Hermosillo                     |  |             | 1,200,922  |  |               |  | 67,368    |       |  |  | 1,268,290   |  |  |               | 1,288,735  |  |       |  | 65,352    |             |  |  | 1,354,087     |  |  |       | 1,329,859  |  |  |  | 48,364    |  |  |  | 1,378,223  | 
|Guanajuato                     |  |             | 854,215    |  |               |  | 3,840     |       |  |  | 858,055     |  |  |               | 950,319    |  |       |  | 6,914     |             |  |  | 957,233       |  |  |       | 998,140    |  |  |  | 11,993    |  |  |  | 1,010,133  | 
|La Paz                         |  |             | 546,474    |  |               |  | 1,261     |       |  |  | 547,735     |  |  |               | 553,130    |  |       |  | 2,246     |             |  |  | 555,376       |  |  |       | 600,383    |  |  |  | 1,152     |  |  |  | 601,535    | 
|Mexicali                       |  |             | 493,047    |  |               |  | 7,541     |       |  |  | 500,588     |  |  |               | 521,855    |  |       |  | 3,353     |             |  |  | 525,208       |  |  |       | 496,052    |  |  |  | 4,867     |  |  |  | 500,919    | 
|Aguascalientes                 |  |             | 328,490    |  |               |  | 737       |       |  |  | 329,227     |  |  |               | 400,094    |  |       |  | 216       |             |  |  | 400,310       |  |  |       | 456,686    |  |  |  | 304       |  |  |  | 456,990    | 
|Morelia                        |  |             | 376,171    |  |               |  | 2,063     |       |  |  | 378,234     |  |  |               | 409,256    |  |       |  | 2,118     |             |  |  | 411,374       |  |  |       | 425,213    |  |  |  | 2,931     |  |  |  | 428,144    | 
|Los Mochis                     |  |             | 205,800    |  |               |  | 17,466    |       |  |  | 223,266     |  |  |               | 183,518    |  |       |  | 15,918    |             |  |  | 199,436       |  |  |       | 196,805    |  |  |  | 15,412    |  |  |  | 212,217    | 
|Manzanillo                     |  |             | 157,168    |  |               |  | 6,233     |       |  |  | 163,401     |  |  |               | 168,045    |  |       |  | 3,540     |             |  |  | 171,585       |  |  |       | 193,297    |  |  |  | 3,051     |  |  |  | 196,348    | 
|                               |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Total                          |  |             | 20,207,576 |  |               |  | 223,038   |       |  |  | 20,430,614  |  |  |               | 21,287,278 |  |       |  | 201,202   |             |  |  | 21,488,480    |  |  |       | 23,173,384 |  |  |  | 178,940   |  |  |  | 23,352,324 | 
|                               |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|                               |  |             |           
|                               |  | 2011        |            |  | 2012          |  |           | 2013  | 
|                               |  | Domestic    |            |  | International |  |           | Total |  |  | Domestic    |  |  | International |            |  | Total |  |           | Domestic    |  |  | International |  |  | Total |           
|Terminal Departing Passengers: |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Guadalajara                    |  |             | 2,339,153  |  |               |  | 1,285,806 |       |  |  | 3,624,959   |  |  |               | 2,478,647  |  |       |  | 1,275,558 |             |  |  | 3,754,205     |  |  |       | 2,745,922  |  |  |  | 1,367,518 |  |  |  | 4,113,440  | 
|Tijuana                        |  |             | 1,689,793  |  |               |  | 16,470    |       |  |  | 1,706,263   |  |  |               | 1,813,459  |  |       |  | 16,583    |             |  |  | 1,830,042     |  |  |       | 2,049,999  |  |  |  | 18,412    |  |  |  | 2,068,411  | 
|Los Cabos                      |  |             | 391,053    |  |               |  | 1,015,916 |       |  |  | 1,406,969   |  |  |               | 439,469    |  |       |  | 1,074,424 |             |  |  | 1,513,893     |  |  |       | 449,707    |  |  |  | 1,249,665 |  |  |  | 1,699,372  | 
|Puerto Vallarta                |  |             | 345,445    |  |               |  | 926,796   |       |  |  | 1,272,241   |  |  |               | 385,817    |  |       |  | 917,409   |             |  |  | 1,303,226     |  |  |       | 413,815    |  |  |  | 928,459   |  |  |  | 1,342,274  | 
|Hermosillo                     |  |             | 545,650    |  |               |  | 41,351    |       |  |  | 587,001     |  |  |               | 584,765    |  |       |  | 44,816    |             |  |  | 629,581       |  |  |       | 607,639    |  |  |  | 46,543    |  |  |  | 654,182    | 
|Guanajuato                     |  |             | 220,009    |  |               |  | 204,231   |       |  |  | 424,240     |  |  |               | 257,028    |  |       |  | 215,743   |             |  |  | 472,771       |  |  |       | 291,360    |  |  |  | 206,531   |  |  |  | 497,891    | 
|La Paz                         |  |             | 264,118    |  |               |  | 15,026    |       |  |  | 279,144     |  |  |               | 266,158    |  |       |  | 15,840    |             |  |  | 281,998       |  |  |       | 295,464    |  |  |  | 10,611    |  |  |  | 306,075    | 
|Mexicali                       |  |             | 233,496    |  |               |  | 2,018     |       |  |  | 235,514     |  |  |               | 247,554    |  |       |  | 2,530     |             |  |  | 250,084       |  |  |       | 236,012    |  |  |  | 2,382     |  |  |  | 238,394    | 
|Aguascalientes                 |  |             | 112,007    |  |               |  | 53,623    |       |  |  | 165,630     |  |  |               | 128,797    |  |       |  | 72,157    |             |  |  | 200,954       |  |  |       | 154,968    |  |  |  | 75,058    |  |  |  | 230,026    | 
|Morelia                        |  |             | 112,103    |  |               |  | 75,221    |       |  |  | 187,324     |  |  |               | 104,690    |  |       |  | 99,855    |             |  |  | 204,545       |  |  |       | 114,516    |  |  |  | 99,553    |  |  |  | 214,069    | 
|Los Mochis                     |  |             | 100,522    |  |               |  | 4,322     |       |  |  | 104,844     |  |  |               | 88,029     |  |       |  | 3,981     |             |  |  | 92,010        |  |  |       | 94,612     |  |  |  | 4,498     |  |  |  | 99,110     | 
|Manzanillo                     |  |             | 36,866     |  |               |  | 41,891    |       |  |  | 78,757      |  |  |               | 42,552     |  |       |  | 41,271    |             |  |  | 83,823        |  |  |       | 55,240     |  |  |  | 40,945    |  |  |  | 96,185     | 
|                               |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Total                          |  |             | 6,390,215  |  |               |  | 3,682,671 |       |  |  | 10,072,886  |  |  |               | 6,836,965  |  |       |  | 3,780,167 |             |  |  | 10,617,132    |  |  |       | 7,509,254  |  |  |  | 4,050,175 |  |  |  | 11,559,429 | 
|                               |  |             |            |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |             |  |  |               |            |  |       |  |           |             |  |  |               |  |  |       |            |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 



50



---

##### Table of Contents

|                              |  |          |           |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |            |  |  |               |           |  |       |  |           |          |  |  |               |  |  |       |           |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|----------------------------- |  | -------- | --------- |  | ------------- |  | --------- | ----- |  |  | ---------- |  |  | ------------- | --------- |  | ----- |  | --------- | -------- |  |  | ------------- |  |  | ----- | --------- |  |  |  | --------- |  |  |  | ---------- | 
|                              |  |          |          
|                              |  | 2011     |           |  | 2012          |  |           | 2013  | 
|                              |  | Domestic |           |  | International |  |           | Total |  |  | Domestic   |  |  | International |           |  | Total |  |           | Domestic |  |  | International |  |  | Total |          
|Terminal Arriving Passengers: |  |          |           |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |            |  |  |               |           |  |       |  |           |          |  |  |               |  |  |       |           |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Guadalajara                   |  |          | 2,376,723 |  |               |  | 1,199,987 |       |  |  | 3,576,710  |  |  |               | 2,511,683 |  |       |  | 1,170,464 |          |  |  | 3,682,147     |  |  |       | 2,796,408 |  |  |  | 1,238,637 |  |  |  | 4,035,045  | 
|Tijuana                       |  |          | 1,786,576 |  |               |  | 7,928     |       |  |  | 1,794,504  |  |  |               | 1,924,659 |  |       |  | 5,072     |          |  |  | 1,929,731     |  |  |       | 2,196,202 |  |  |  | 4,911     |  |  |  | 2,201,113  | 
|Los Cabos                     |  |          | 402,040   |  |               |  | 997,968   |       |  |  | 1,400,008  |  |  |               | 446,180   |  |       |  | 1,058,443 |          |  |  | 1,504,623     |  |  |       | 462,187   |  |  |  | 1,226,146 |  |  |  | 1,688,333  | 
|Puerto Vallarta               |  |          | 369,677   |  |               |  | 893,958   |       |  |  | 1,263,635  |  |  |               | 413,698   |  |       |  | 880,761   |          |  |  | 1,294,459     |  |  |       | 446,531   |  |  |  | 882,430   |  |  |  | 1,328,961  | 
|Hermosillo                    |  |          | 583,063   |  |               |  | 30,858    |       |  |  | 613,921    |  |  |               | 626,754   |  |       |  | 32,400    |          |  |  | 659,154       |  |  |       | 642,132   |  |  |  | 33,545    |  |  |  | 675,677    | 
|Guanajuato                    |  |          | 254,113   |  |               |  | 175,862   |       |  |  | 429,975    |  |  |               | 294,665   |  |       |  | 182,883   |          |  |  | 477,548       |  |  |       | 327,430   |  |  |  | 172,819   |  |  |  | 500,249    | 
|La Paz                        |  |          | 254,387   |  |               |  | 12,943    |       |  |  | 267,330    |  |  |               | 260,040   |  |       |  | 11,092    |          |  |  | 271,132       |  |  |       | 288,960   |  |  |  | 5,348     |  |  |  | 294,308    | 
|Mexicali                      |  |          | 256,684   |  |               |  | 849       |       |  |  | 257,533    |  |  |               | 270,886   |  |       |  | 885       |          |  |  | 271,771       |  |  |       | 256,729   |  |  |  | 929       |  |  |  | 257,658    | 
|Aguascalientes                |  |          | 121,391   |  |               |  | 41,469    |       |  |  | 162,860    |  |  |               | 138,763   |  |       |  | 60,377    |          |  |  | 199,140       |  |  |       | 165,846   |  |  |  | 60,814    |  |  |  | 226,660    | 
|Morelia                       |  |          | 117,950   |  |               |  | 70,897    |       |  |  | 188,847    |  |  |               | 113,392   |  |       |  | 91,319    |          |  |  | 204,711       |  |  |       | 119,197   |  |  |  | 91,947    |  |  |  | 211,144    | 
|Los Mochis                    |  |          | 100,515   |  |               |  | 441       |       |  |  | 100,956    |  |  |               | 91,085    |  |       |  | 423       |          |  |  | 91,508        |  |  |       | 97,218    |  |  |  | 477       |  |  |  | 97,695     | 
|Manzanillo                    |  |          | 42,060    |  |               |  | 36,351    |       |  |  | 78,411     |  |  |               | 45,965    |  |       |  | 38,257    |          |  |  | 84,222        |  |  |       | 62,204    |  |  |  | 34,908    |  |  |  | 97,112     | 
|                              |  |          |           |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |            |  |  |               |           |  |       |  |           |          |  |  |               |  |  |       |           |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 
|Total                         |  |          | 6,665,179 |  |               |  | 3,469,511 |       |  |  | 10,134,690 |  |  |               | 7,137,770 |  |       |  | 3,532,376 |          |  |  | 10,670,146    |  |  |       | 7,861,044 |  |  |  | 3,752,911 |  |  |  | 11,613,955 | 
|                              |  |          |           |  |               |  |           |       |  |  |            |  |  |               |           |  |       |  |           |          |  |  |               |  |  |       |           |  |  |  |           |  |  |  |            | 



|(1) | Includes arriving and departing passengers as well as transfer passengers (passengers who arrive on one aircraft and depart on a different aircraft).
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Terminal passengers who arrive at our airports but generally depart without changing aircraft.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following table sets forth the air traffic movement capacity of each of our airports as of December 31, 2013.

Capacity by Airport (2013)



|                |  |                                      |    |  |                    |  |    | 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | -- |  | ------------------ |  | -- | 
|Airport         |  | Peak air trafficmovements perhour(1) |    |  | Runway capacity(2) | 
|Guadalajara     |  |                                      | 38 |  |                    |  | 39 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                                      | 16 |  |                    |  | 31 | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                                      | 26 |  |                    |  | 37 | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                                      | 27 |  |                    |  | 29 | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                                      | 20 |  |                    |  | 29 | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                                      | 11 |  |                    |  | 13 | 
|La Paz          |  |                                      | 9  |  |                    |  | 18 | 
|Mexicali        |  |                                      | 7  |  |                    |  | 19 | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                                      | 8  |  |                    |  | 16 | 
|Morelia         |  |                                      | 8  |  |                    |  | 11 | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                                      | 8  |  |                    |  | 12 | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                                      | 6  |  |                    |  | 11 | 



|(1) | Includes Commercial and General Aviation Operations (demand).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Air traffic movements per hour (capacity).
|--- | ------------------------------------------



51



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the air traffic movements for each of our airports for the years
indicated.

Air Traffic Movements by Airport(1)



|                |  |                                 |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------- |  | ---- |  | ------- | ---- |  |  | ------- | 
|                |  | For the year ended December 31, |        
|                |  | 2011                            |         |  | 2012 |  |         | 2013 | 
|Guadalajara     |  |                                 | 129,979 |  |      |  | 127,012 |      |  |  | 132,338 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                                 | 42,393  |  |      |  | 42,963  |      |  |  | 48,335  | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                                 | 34,288  |  |      |  | 36,523  |      |  |  | 38,261  | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                                 | 39,689  |  |      |  | 39,056  |      |  |  | 39,811  | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                                 | 44,005  |  |      |  | 46,954  |      |  |  | 46,654  | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                                 | 24,920  |  |      |  | 25,598  |      |  |  | 25,658  | 
|La Paz          |  |                                 | 18,957  |  |      |  | 17,175  |      |  |  | 16,736  | 
|Mexicali        |  |                                 | 11,573  |  |      |  | 10,312  |      |  |  | 9,804   | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                                 | 12,965  |  |      |  | 14,729  |      |  |  | 14,703  | 
|Morelia         |  |                                 | 14,906  |  |      |  | 13,747  |      |  |  | 12,773  | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                                 | 14,402  |  |      |  | 13,596  |      |  |  | 11,849  | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                                 | 7,341   |  |      |  | 7,254   |      |  |  | 7,042   | 
|                |  |                                 |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 
|Total           |  |                                 | 395,418 |  |      |  | 394,919 |      |  |  | 403,964 | 
|                |  |                                 |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 



|(1) | Includes departures and arrivals.
|--- | ---------------------------------

The following table sets forth the average number of
passengers per air traffic movement for each of our airports for the years indicated:

Average Passengers per Air Traffic Movement by
Airport(1)



|                        |  |                         |       |  |      |  |       |      |  |  |       | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ----- |  | ---- |  | ----- | ---- |  |  | ----- | 
|                        |  | Year ended December 31, |      
|                        |  | 2011                    |       |  | 2012 |  |       | 2013 | 
|Guadalajara             |  |                         | 55.78 |  |      |  | 58.86 |      |  |  | 61.80 | 
|Tijuana                 |  |                         | 83.57 |  |      |  | 88.81 |      |  |  | 89.47 | 
|Los Cabos               |  |                         | 82.31 |  |      |  | 82.68 |      |  |  | 88.56 | 
|Puerto Vallarta         |  |                         | 64.15 |  |      |  | 66.65 |      |  |  | 67.23 | 
|Hermosillo              |  |                         | 28.82 |  |      |  | 28.84 |      |  |  | 29.54 | 
|Guanajuato              |  |                         | 34.43 |  |      |  | 37.39 |      |  |  | 39.37 | 
|La Paz                  |  |                         | 28.89 |  |      |  | 32.34 |      |  |  | 35.94 | 
|Mexicali                |  |                         | 43.25 |  |      |  | 50.93 |      |  |  | 51.09 | 
|Aguascalientes          |  |                         | 25.39 |  |      |  | 27.18 |      |  |  | 31.08 | 
|Morelia                 |  |                         | 25.37 |  |      |  | 29.92 |      |  |  | 33.52 | 
|Los Mochis              |  |                         | 15.50 |  |      |  | 14.67 |      |  |  | 17.91 | 
|Manzanillo              |  |                         | 22.26 |  |      |  | 23.65 |      |  |  | 27.88 | 
|                        |  |                         |       |  |      |  |       |      |  |  |       | 
|Average of all airports |  |                         | 51.67 |  |      |  | 54.41 |      |  |  | 57.81 | 
|                        |  |                         |       |  |      |  |       |      |  |  |       | 



|(1) | Includes number of total passengers within the total number of air traffic movements.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



52



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the air traffic movements in our airports for the years indicated
in terms of commercial, charter and general aviation:

Air Traffic Movements by Aviation Category(1)



|                           |  |                         |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- |  | ---- |  | ------- | ---- |  |  | ------- | 
|                           |  | Year ended December 31, |        
|                           |  | 2011                    |         |  | 2012 |  |         | 2013 | 
|Commercial Aviation        |  |                         | 281,710 |  |      |  | 284,283 |      |  |  | 295,154 | 
|Charter Aviation           |  |                         | 15,887  |  |      |  | 16,453  |      |  |  | 16,896  | 
|General Aviation and other |  |                         | 97,821  |  |      |  | 94,183  |      |  |  | 91,914  | 
|                           |  |                         |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 
|Total                      |  |                         | 395,418 |  |      |  | 394,919 |      |  |  | 403,964 | 
|                           |  |                         |         |  |      |  |         |      |  |  |         | 



|(1) | Includes departures and landings for all 12 airports.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------

Guadalajara International Airport

Guadalajara International Airport is our most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, air traffic movements and
contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, the Guadalajara International Airport was the third busiest in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic, according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary
Services Agency. In 2013, the Guadalajara International Airport accounted for approximately 35.2% of our terminal passenger traffic.

In
2013, a total of 8.1 million terminal passengers were served by Guadalajara International Airport. Of the terminal passengers in 2013, 68.0% were domestic passengers and 32.0% were international passengers. Of the airports international
passengers, we estimate that a significant portion are Mexicans living in the United States visiting Guadalajara. This airport also serves many business travelers traveling to and from Guadalajara. Because the airports passengers are
predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results of operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A
total of 11 airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones being Volaris, Aeroméxico Group and Interjet. The main non-Mexican airlines operating at the airport are United Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Delta Airlines, US Airways, and
American Airlines. Airlines operating at the airport reach 43 destinations. Of these destinations Mexico City, Tijuana and Los Angeles are the most popular.

Guadalajara International Airport is located approximately 20 kilometers from the city of Guadalajara, which has a population (including its
suburbs) of approximately 5 million inhabitants. Guadalajara is Mexicos second largest city in terms of population and is the capital of the state of Jalisco, the countrys second largest state in terms of population. As a major hub
for the Mexican national highway system, the city of Guadalajara is an important center for both ground and air transportation. Other major cities in the state of Jalisco include Puerto Vallarta and Lagos de Moreno. Jalisco is an important
agricultural producer, making Guadalajara an important center for agricultural commerce. The state is an important contributor to Mexicos maquiladora industry, most notably in the electronic, computer equipment and clothing industries.
The maquiladora industry in Jalisco grew significantly in the 1990s as maquiladoras moved away from the U.S.-Mexico border seeking lower labor costs and a more diverse labor pool.

Guadalajara International Airport operates 24 hours daily. The airport has two operating runways, one with a length of 4,000 meters and a full
parallel taxiway and the other with a length of 1,770 meters, with a threshold displacement of 300 meters at the runway, which permits a landing distance of 1,470 meters. The runway capacity at this airport is 39 air traffic movements per hour. The
airport also has an Instrument Landing System (ILS) that assists pilots in poor weather. The airports facilities include a main commercial terminal with a large parking facility and a general aviation building. The airports main



53



---

##### Table of Contents

commercial terminal has a total area of approximately 64,500 square meters, as well as parking facilities consisting of an additional 46,000 square meters. The general aviation building has an
additional 1,825 square meters. The main commercial terminal has 22 gates (four of which are in our regional Terminal 2) and 36 remote boarding positions. Of the 22 gates, eight serve international flights and 14 serve domestic flights. Of the
international gates, three have air bridges, and of the domestic gates, five have air bridges. Additionally there are eight remote positions used for the regional flights commonly used by Aeroméxico Connect and VivaAerobus.

As part of our business strategy, during 2010 we began changing the profile and category of service of almost all of the stores to ones with
greater brand recognition. We completed this process during the second quarter of 2012. The airport has an onsite hotel operated by a third party from which we derive no revenues, but we are in the process of recovering the hotel from the third
party through legal actions.

We have continued to take significant steps to modernize and expand the Guadalajara International Airport in
order to improve its operations and image. These steps have included the improvement of the airports runways and platforms, an increase in the number of remote boarding positions, the installation of an improved computer system and expansion
of the main commercial terminal, including the installation and/or modernization of air bridges, the baggage claim area, ticket counters, restrooms, hallways and gate areas. In addition, between 2010 and 2011 we completed the expansion of the
international baggage claim area, we expanded the access point areas for departing passengers, and we upgraded the departures hall. Also, during 2011, we completed the new food court, which adds another 250 square meters for food and beverage sales.
We also remodeled an additional 100 square meters for specialty retail stores. During 2013, the number of departure gates for domestic flights was increased, and work began on the aircraft parking area in order to add 20 new aircraft remote parking
positions. In addition, the international arrivals area is also being expanded, and two new aircraft parking gates will be added to this area. This expansion includes the enlargement of the customs and immigration facilities, as well as the
departures lounge and commercial areas.

Tijuana International Airport

Tijuana International Airport is our second most important airport in terms of passenger traffic and air traffic movements, and the third in
contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Tijuana International Airport was the fifth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services
Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 18.4% of our terminal passenger traffic.

In 2013, Tijuana International Airport served a
total of 4.3 million terminal passengers. Approximately 99.5% of those terminal passengers were domestic passengers. Since Tijuana is located near the Mexico-U.S. border and is therefore a popular entry point to the United States, a majority of
the airports passengers consists of Mexican migrant workers traveling to Tijuana in order to seek work in the United States. Accordingly, the airports passenger traffic and results of operations are affected by Mexican and U.S. economic
conditions. A highway connecting the city of Tijuana to the airport also extends directly to the U.S.-Mexico border crossing, providing convenient access to San Diego, California (which is located approximately 30 kilometers from Tijuana
International Airport) and other areas of southern California, particularly Los Angeles.

Tijuana International Airport serves the city of
Tijuana and surrounding areas in the State of Baja California, including the municipalities of Ensenada, Tecate and Rosarito. With a population of approximately 1.6 million, Tijuana is the largest city in the state. Currently, in terms of
population, the state of Baja California is the second largest maquiladora center in Mexico, according to the Mexican National Institute for Statistics and Geography (INEGI).



54



---

##### Table of Contents

A total of five airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Volaris and
Aeroméxico Group. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to 37 destinations. Of these destinations Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Culiacan are the most popular. In addition, Aeroméxico flies twice weekly from Tijuana to
Tokyo and Shanghai.

Tijuana International Airport currently operates 17 hours daily between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m.
However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for other aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. The airport has one runway with a length of 2,960 meters and a full
parallel taxiway. The runway capacity at this airport is 31 air traffic movements per hour. The airport also has an Instrument Landing System (ILS) that assists pilots in poor weather. It has 19 gates serving both domestic and international
travelers and six remote boarding positions. Of the 19 gates, ten have air bridges.

Construction of an international bridge will take
place during 2014; this bridge will allow passengers to cross directly to the United States by crossing the highway between the airport and the international border. The use of this facility will be limited to passengers traveling through the
airport. The new bridge will allow for a significant reduction in border-crossing times for travelers going to the United States and vice-versa. The bridge is expected to become operational during the first quarter of 2015. We estimate that
approximately 50% of all passengers travelling through Tijuana International Airport will use the international bridge.

In 2013,
approximately 16.9 thousand metric tons of cargo was transported through the airport.

A portion of the land comprising Tijuana
International Airport was expropriated by the Mexican federal government in 1970 pursuant to its power of eminent domain and is subject to certain legal proceedings by its former landholders. For a description of these legal proceedings and their
potential impact on our operations, see Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Ejido Participants at Tijuana, Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta Airport.

Los Cabos International Airport

Los Cabos International Airport is our third most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, our fifth most important airport in terms of
air traffic movements and second most important airport in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Los Cabos International Airport was the sixth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial
aviation passenger traffic, according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, Los Cabos International Airport accounted for approximately 14.6% of our terminal passenger traffic.

Approximately 3.4 million terminal passengers were served by the airport in 2013. Approximately 73.1% of the terminal passengers were
international passengers. The airport serves primarily tourists visiting San Jose del Cabo, Cabo San Lucas and other coastal destinations along the Trans-Peninsular highway of the state of Baja California Sur.

A total of 23 airlines operate at the airport with Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, United Airlines, Interjet, Airtran, US Airways and
Volaris being the principal ones. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to 40 destinations. Of these destinations, Mexico City, Los Angeles and Phoenix are the most popular.

Los Cabos International Airport is located approximately 13 kilometers from the city of San Jose del Cabo, in the state of Baja California
Sur. In 2013, the number of visitors to Los Cabos (San José del Cabo and the nearby city of Cabo San Lucas) was approximately 1.4 million, according to the Mexican Immigration Institute. Visitors to this area are generally affluent and
include golfers who enjoy world-



55



---

##### Table of Contents

class courses, as well as sports fishing and scuba diving enthusiasts who are drawn by the rich marine life in the regions coastal waters. We believe a growing percentage of visitors to Los
Cabos consist of recurring visitors as the popularity and availability of time-shares in the area has increased over recent years.

Los
Cabos International Airport currently operates 11 hours daily between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside
normal business hours. The airport has one runway measuring 3,000 meters, and a full parallel taxiway to the runway. The runway capacity at this airport is 37 air traffic movements per hour. The existing runway allows us to serve planes flying to
any destination in the United States and Canada. The airport has two commercial aviation terminals. Terminal 1 occupies approximately 14,600 square meters, and the new Terminal 2, which opened on November 1, 2012, occupies approximately 38,000
square meters. In October 2013, we added 576 square meters of commercial area to Terminal 2. This new commercial space began operations on December 12, 2013. The airport has 16 gates (eight in Terminal 1 and eight in Terminal 2), including four
gates with air bridges, and 14 remote boarding positions. In addition, the airport has a general aviation and a Fixed Base Operations terminal (FBO). We operate commercial space of approximately 2,000 square meters at Los Cabos International
Airport; this space includes two VIP lounges and three convenience stores operated directly by us. In 2013, approximately 35.7% of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated at Los Cabos International Airport was derived
from non-aeronautical revenues (of which 89.5% came from commercial activities); the latter percentage is higher than any other airport of the Group.

Puerto Vallarta International Airport

Puerto Vallarta International Airport is our fourth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, air traffic movements and
contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Puerto Vallarta International Airport was the seventh busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and
Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 11.5% of our terminal passenger traffic.

In 2013, 2.7 million
terminal passengers traveled through Puerto Vallarta International Airport. We estimate that 67.8% of these terminal passengers were international passengers and 32.2% were domestic passengers. The airport primarily serves foreign tourists and is a
popular tourist destination in Mexico.

A total of 22 airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Alaska Airlines, United
Airlines, Interjet and WestJet. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to 51 destinations. Of these destinations, the most popular are Mexico City, Phoenix and Los Angeles.

Puerto Vallarta International Airport is located on the Pacific coast in the state of Jalisco. Puerto Vallartas tourist attractions
include the natural beauty of the Bay of Banderas, the areas many beaches and abundant marine wildlife. Puerto Vallarta is a mature tourist destination, and the completion of new resort areas including hotels and golf courses in the areas
known as Nuevo Vallarta and Punta Mita is expected to bring more tourists to the area in subsequent years. We believe that a significant portion of the tourists visiting Puerto Vallarta are time-share owners who make frequent trips to the area.

Puerto Vallarta International Airport operates 24 hours daily. The airport has one runway with a length of 3,100 meters as well as a parallel
taxiway. The runway capacity at this airport is 29 air traffic movements per hour. This airport has one main commercial terminal, a Fixed Base Operations terminal, or FBO, and a general aviation building. FBOs are specialized, full service
operations offered to general aviation aircraft. The services offered to FBO users include refueling, cleaning, and catering. The airport



56



---

##### Table of Contents

has 19 gates, of which five serve domestic flights and 14 serve international flights, seven remote boarding positions and eleven air bridges. During 2012, we added 6,000 square meters to the
terminal building, of which 200 square meters is dedicated to commercial use; this space includes two VIP lounges operated directly by us. In 2013, approximately 25.5% of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues generated at our
Puerto Vallarta International Airport was derived from non-aeronautical revenues (of which 88.5% came from commercial activities).

Hermosillo
International Airport

Hermosillo International Airport is our fifth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, our
third most important airport in terms of air traffic movements and our fifth most important in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Hermosillo International Airport was the eighth busiest airport
in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 5.7% of our terminal passenger traffic.

In 2013, Hermosillo International Airport served approximately 1.3 million terminal passengers, and approximately 94.0% of those terminal
passengers were domestic passengers. Many of the airports passengers use the airport as a hub for connecting flights between other Mexican cities, particularly Mexico City, Tijuana, Guadalajara and Monterrey. Because the airports
passengers are predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results of operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A total of seven airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Aeroméxico Group, Volaris and VivaAerobus. Airlines operating
at this airport provide service to 26 destinations. Of these destinations, Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey and Tijuana are the most popular.

Hermosillo International Airport serves the city of Hermosillo and four other nearby municipalities, which together have a population of
approximately 1.0 million, according to the Mexican National Population Council. The city of Hermosillo, which is the capital of the state of Sonora, is located approximately 260 kilometers south of the border town of Nogales and 130 kilometers
east of the Gulf of California. The airport is located approximately 13 kilometers west of the city of Hermosillo. The airport is an important hub in a primarily agricultural and industrial region. Approximately 10.5 thousand metric tons of
cargo passed through the airport in 2013. Currently, cargo transport services at this airport primarily serve the nearby Ford factory, which receives components via the airport.

Hermosillo International Airport operates 18 hours daily between 6:00 a.m. and 00:00 a.m. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if
necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. The airport has two runways, one with a length of 2,300 meters and the other with a length of 1,100 meters. The runway capacity
at this airport is 29 air traffic movements per hour. The airport has nine gates and ten remote positions and includes both a commercial aviation building and a general aviation building for small private airplanes.

As part of our business strategy, during 2013 we began changing the profile and category of services of almost all of the stores at Hermosillo
International Airport to stores with greater brand recognition. We completed this process during the last quarter of 2013.

Guanajuato International
Airport

Guanajuato International Airport is our sixth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, air traffic movements
and contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Guanajuato International Airport was the fourteenth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial



57



---

##### Table of Contents

aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 4.3% of our terminal passenger traffic. During 2013, the airport
served 998.1 thousand terminal passengers, 62.0% of which were domestic passengers.

A total of nine airlines operate at the airport;
the principal ones are Aeroméxico Group, Volaris and United Airlines. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to 16 destinations. Of these destinations Tijuana, Mexico City and Houston are the most popular. Guanajuato International
Airport is located in the central state of Guanajuato near the cities of Leon, Irapuato, Silao and Guanajuato, approximately 315 kilometers northwest of Mexico City. The state of Guanajuato has a population of approximately 5.5 million people
according to the Mexican National Population Council and is located in Mexicos Bajio region, best known for its rich colonial history, agricultural sector and manufacturing industry. General Motors has an assembly plant in Silao, Guanajuato,
and Mazda has a new vehicle manufacturing plant in Salamanca, Guanajuato. The local government is developing a dry dock, or truck loading service terminal, near the airport that we believe will increase cargo demand. Guanajuato
International Airport operates 20 hours daily between 4:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal
business hours. The airport has one runway with a length of 3,500 meters. The runway capacity at this airport is 13 air traffic movements per hour. It has two terminals (one commercial and one general aviation), with six gates, five remote boarding
positions and three air bridges.

During 2013, we completed construction on the arrivals area, expanding it by 500 square meters. The work
included new baggage claim belts and a re-organization of the customs and immigration facilities. As part of our business strategy, our construction during the second quarter 2013 focused on redesigning the car rental counters and increasing the
advertising spaces in that area by 20%.

La Paz International Airport

La Paz International Airport is our seventh most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, air traffic movements and contribution to the
sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, La Paz International Airport was the twenty-second busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services
Agency. In 2013 it accounted for approximately 2.6% of our terminal passenger traffic.

During 2013, La Paz International Airport served
600.4 thousand terminal passengers. We estimate that approximately 97.3% of these terminal passengers were domestic passengers. Because the airports passengers are predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results
of operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A total of five airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones of which
are Volaris and Aeroméxico Group. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to fifteen destinations. Of these destinations, Mexico City, Guadalajara and Tijuana are the most popular.

La Paz International Airport serves the city of La Paz, located along the coast of the Gulf of California in the state of Baja California Sur,
of which La Paz is the capital. Eco-tourism is a growing industry in La Paz due to the abundance of marine life found in the Gulf of California.

La Paz International Airport operates 16 hours daily between 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if
necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. The airport has one runway measuring 2,500 meters in length and a single main commercial terminal. The runway capacity at this
airport is 18 air traffic movements per hour. It also has three gates and seven remote boarding positions.



58



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2013, we completed construction on both the arrival and departure areas. The arrivals area
was enlarged by 1,500 square meters, and two new baggage claim belts were installed. There was also a re-organization of the customs and immigration facilities within the arrivals area. We also optimized the existing advertising spaces in the new
areas to drive higher revenue per square meter.

Mexicali International Airport

Mexicali International Airport is our eighth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, our eleventh most important airport in terms
of air traffic movements and our tenth most important in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Mexicali International Airport was the twenty-fourth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial
aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 2.1% of our terminal passenger traffic. During 2013, Mexicali International Airport served 496.1 thousand
terminal passengers. We estimate that approximately 99.3% of passengers served by this airport in 2013 were domestic passengers. Because the airports passengers are predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results of
operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A total of three airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Volaris
and Aeroméxico. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to five destinations. Of these destinations, Mexico City and Guadalajara are the most popular.

Mexicali International Airport serves the city of Mexicali, in the Mexican state of Baja California, as well as the U.S. cities of Yuma,
Arizona and Calexico, California. The city of Mexicali is located along the U.S.-Mexico border approximately 150 kilometers east of Tijuana and 80 kilometers west of Yuma, Arizona. Manufacturing forms the basis of the areas economy, most
notably in the form of maquiladorafactories, which have proliferated along the California-Baja California border.

Mexicali
International Airport operates 19 hours daily between 6:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m. the following day. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside
normal business hours. The airport has one runway measuring 2,600 meters in length as well as a main commercial terminal and a smaller general aviation terminal. The runway capacity at this airport is 19 air traffic movements per hour. The main
commercial terminal has two gates and four remote boarding positions.

Aguascalientes International Airport

Aguascalientes International Airport is our ninth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic and contribution to the sum of
aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues and our eighth most important in terms of air traffic movements. In 2013, Aguascalientes International Airport was the twenty-eighth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger
traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 2.0% of our terminal passenger traffic. During 2013, the airport served 456.7 thousand terminal passengers. Of these passengers, we
estimate that approximately 70.2% were domestic passengers. Because the airports passengers are predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results of operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A total of seven airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Volaris, Aeroméxico Group and American Airlines. Airlines
operating at this airport provide service to six destinations. Of these destinations Mexico City, Tijuana, Dallas and Los Angeles are the most popular.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

Aguascalientes International Airport serves the city of Aguascalientes and eight surrounding
municipalities in the central state of Aguascalientes, which is located roughly 513 kilometers northwest of Mexico City. Manufacturing forms the basis of the regions economy. One of Nissans main manufacturing plants in Mexico is located
in the city of Aguascalientes.

Aguascalientes International Airport operates 14 hours daily between 6:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. However, it
is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. It has two runways, one measuring 3,000 meters in length and the other (which is
closed temporarily) measuring 1,000 meters, and a single main commercial terminal. The runway capacity at this airport is 16 air traffic movements per hour. The airport has three gates and four remote boarding locations.

During 2013, we completed several construction projects at the airport. The arrivals area was expanded by 500 square meters, including the
installation of a new baggage claim belt. The departures lounge was enlarged as well, and the customs and immigration facilities were re-organized to allow a faster and more continuous flow of passengers. We also continued our expansion of
commercial areas operated by us, and in the third quarter of 2013 we opened a second convenience store in the passenger departure area.

Morelia
International Airport

Morelia International Airport is our tenth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, our ninth
most important in terms of air traffic movements and our eighth most important in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Morelia International Airport was the thirtieth busiest airport in Mexico in
terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 1.8% of our terminal passenger traffic. In 2013, the Morelia International Airport served
425.2 thousand terminal passengers. We estimate that approximately 55.0% of the terminal passengers were domestic passengers. Because the airports passengers are predominantly domestic, the airports passenger traffic and results of
operations are affected by Mexican economic conditions.

A total of five airlines operate at the airport; the principal ones are Volaris,
Aeroméxico Group and United Airlines. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to 10 destinations. Of these destinations, Tijuana, Los Angeles and Mexico City are the most popular.

Morelia International Airport serves the city of Morelia and ten other municipalities in the immediate vicinity. The city of Morelia is the
capital of the state of Michoacan, which has a population of approximately 4.4 million according to the Mexican National Population Council. Michoacans principal industry is agriculture, and it has a developing eco-tourism industry
(primarily due to the seasonal presence of monarch butterflies).

Morelia International Airport operates 24 hours a day. The airport has
one runway with a length of 3,400 meters and a single main terminal building. The runway capacity at this airport is 11 air traffic movements per hour. The airport has four gates and eight remote boarding positions.

During 2013, we completed construction on the arrivals area to expand it by 500 square meters. The expansion included the addition of two new
baggage claim belts and a re-organization of the customs and immigration facilities.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

Los Mochis International Airport

Los Mochis International Airport is our eleventh most important airport in terms of passenger traffic, our tenth most important in terms of air
traffic movements and our twelfth most important in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Los Mochis International Airport was the thirty-seventh busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial
aviation passenger traffic according to the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 0.8% of our terminal passenger traffic.

Los Mochis International Airport serves the city of Los Mochis, in the Pacific coastal state of Sinaloa, an important agricultural state.
During 2013 the airport served 196.8 thousand terminal passengers, approximately 97.5% of which were domestic passengers. The areas sport fishing and hunting attract both Mexican and foreign visitors.

A total of four airlines operate at the airport, which are Aeroméxico Connect, Volaris, Aerocalafia and Transportes
Aeropacífico. Airlines operating at this airport provide service to twelve destinations. Of these destinations, Mexico City, Tijuana and Guadalajara are the most popular.

Los Mochis International Airport operates 14 hours daily between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if
necessary, and we are authorized to charge double our regular passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. The airport has one runway measuring 2,000 meters in length as well as a single main
commercial terminal. The runway capacity at this airport is 12 air traffic movements per hour. The airport has three gates and four remote boarding positions.

Manzanillo International Airport

Manzanillo International Airport is our twelfth most important airport in terms of passenger traffic and air traffic movements, and our
eleventh in terms of contribution to the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. In 2013, Manzanillo International Airport was the thirty-eighth busiest airport in Mexico in terms of commercial aviation passenger traffic according to the
Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency. In 2013, it accounted for approximately 0.8% of our terminal passenger traffic.

During
2013, the airport served 193.3 thousand terminal passengers. We estimate that approximately 60.8% of these passengers were domestic passengers and 39.2% of these passengers were international passengers.

A total of eleven airlines operate at this airport; the principal ones are Aeromar,Alaska Airlines and Aeroméxico Group. The
other airlines operate only during the high tourist season (November to April). The principal destinations served by airlines at this airport are Mexico City, Los Angeles and Calgary.

Manzanillo International Airport serves the city of Manzanillo and six surrounding municipalities in the small Pacific coastal state of
Colima. The city is located on the coast approximately 230 kilometers southeast of Puerto Vallarta and 520 kilometers northwest of Acapulco. The airport serves primarily tourists visiting coastal resorts in Colima and neighboring Jalisco. In recent
years, passenger traffic at the Manzanillo International Airport has remained stable despite the increased popularity of Puerto Vallarta and other tourist destinations due to a decline in investments, in the tourism sector in Manzanillo.

Manzanillo International Airport operates 12 hours daily between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. However, it is equipped to operate 24 hours daily if
necessary, and we double our passenger charges and fees for aeronautical services provided outside normal business hours. The airport has one runway measuring 2,200 meters. The runway capacity at this airport is 11 air traffic movements per hour.
The airport has four gates and five remote boarding positions.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

Our Non-Airport Subsidiaries:

Although we are a holding company that has subsidiaries operating each of our 12 airports, we also have three employee service company
subsidiaries. The employee service companies provide part of the labor force that works in our airports. The airport subsidiaries themselves do not directly employ any personnel. Our employee service companies are (i) Servicios a la
Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. (SIAP), (ii) Corporativo de Servicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. de C.V. (CORSA), and (iii) Puerta Cero Parking, S.A. de C.V. (PCP).
Additionally, in 2013, we established a nonprofit company named Fundación Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, A.C. (Fundación GAP).

SIAP

SIAP was incorporated as a
subsidiary in June 1998 to provide technical assistance and corporate services to our airport operating subsidiaries. SIAP was set up as part of the Mexican governments privatization plan for the airports operated by us. SIAP invoices our
airports for three types of services:



| |  |  | SIAP employs the senior management at our corporate headquarters and at our airports, and charges our subsidiaries for the services rendered according to each subsidiarys individual performance;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As part of the privatization plan that was implemented by the Mexican government in 1998, our strategic shareholder has the right and obligation to enter into various agreements with us and the Mexican government,
including a participation agreement and a stockholders agreement. As a result of the participation agreement requirement, we entered into a 15-year technical assistance agreement with AMP, under which AMP agreed to provide technical assistance
in exchange for an annual fee. Under this agreement, SIAP receives consulting services, technical assistance, and technological and industry knowledge and expertise to manage our airports. SIAP charges our subsidiaries the technical assistance fee,
which is then paid to AMP. See also Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Operating Costs  Technical Assistance Fee and Concession Tax); and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | SIAP employs non-unionized personnel to perform services at our airports according to their capabilities and expertise and collects fees on a monthly basis for the services performed.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORSA

CORSA was incorporated as a
subsidiary on November 8, 2007 and began operations in January 2008. CORSA employs unionized personnel to perform services at our airports according to their capabilities and expertise and collects fees on a monthly basis for the services
performed.

PCP

PCP was
incorporated as a subsidiary on November 28, 2007 and began operations in January 2008. PCP provides operating and administrative services for the airport parking lots. PCP employs both unionized and non-unionized personnel and collects fees on
a monthly basis for the services performed.



62



---

##### Table of Contents

Fundación GAP

This nonprofit company was established in May 2013 with the aim of improving social welfare in the communities near our airports. It will focus
on childrens education and other charitable activities.

Principal Customers

Principal Aeronautical Services Customers

Airline Customers

As of December 31, 2013, 16 international airlines and 8 Mexican airlines operated flights at our 12 airports. Volaris is our principal
airline customer in terms of total passengers at our airports, with Aeroméxico and Aeroméxico Connect (together the Aeroméxico Group) and Interjet providing the second and third highest number of total passengers. In
2012 and 2013, revenues from Volaris and the passengers they moved through our airports totaled Ps. 966.1 million and Ps. 1,127.9 million, respectively, of which Ps. 917.2 million and Ps. 1,068.0 million, respectively, were paid
to the airports for the passengers they moved in form of passenger charges, representing 21.0% and 22.3%, respectively, of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues for 2013. Revenues from the Aeroméxico Group and the
passengers they moved through our airports were Ps. 613.5 million and Ps. 587.8 million during 2012 and 2013, respectively, of which Ps. 577.4 million and Ps. 572.5 million, respectively, were paid to the airports for the
passengers they moved in form of passengers charges, representing 13.2% and 12.0%, respectively, of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues for 2013. In addition to passenger charges (revenues generated by the services provided by
airports to passengers), we also earned revenues from landing charges, aircraft parking charges and the leasing of space to these airlines.

As a result of certain disputes with our airline customers, beginning in 2003, we entered into agreements with the National Air Transportation
Chamber of Commerce and the Ministry of Communications and Transportation pursuant to which we resolved certain existing disputes with our airline customers and entered into (i) contracts governing charges for aeronautical services,
(ii) lease contracts for property used by the airlines and (iii) contracts governing collection of passenger charges. In February 2010 we renewed our agreement for the 2010-2011 period. These agreements represented: (i) virtually all
of the relevant contracts governing the collection of passenger charges, (ii) a substantial majority of the agreements for the leasing of space in our terminals and (iii) a substantial majority of the contracts governing our aeronautical
services, in each case in terms of the total number agreements to be entered into. In March 2012, we signed a new agreement which maintained essentially the same terms as our previous contracts.

Changes in Principal Airlines Operating at our Airports

On August 28, 2010, Grupo Mexicana, which operated through its three subsidiaries, Mexicana, Mexicana Click, and Mexicana Link, suspended
operations indefinitely. On the day Grupo Mexicana suspended operations, they were operating at 10 of our 12 airports. During the first half of 2010, Grupo Mexicana transported 1,869,636 total passengers in our network representing 18.3% of our
total passengers. This made Grupo Mexicana our third most important airline group in terms of the number of passengers transported within our airports. During 2009 and the first half 2010, aeronautical revenues from Grupo Mexicana and from the
passengers they moved through our airports represented 16.2% and 17.0% of our total aeronautical revenues, respectively. We initially recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of Ps. 49.9 million for Grupo Mexicana in 2010, which was
primarily composed of Ps. 38.6 million in passenger charges that Grupo Mexicana collected on behalf of our airports from passengers of Mexicana, Click or Link through August 27, 2010. As of December 31, 2013, as a result of these
initial amounts and other subsequent amounts outstanding from Grupo Mexicana for the rent of certain areas of our airports that Grupo Mexicana still holds, we have an allowance for doubtful accounts of Ps. 74.2 million (net of any value-added
taxes), accumulated since 2010.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

On November 29, 2011, AMR Corporation, parent of American and American Eagle, publicly
announced that AMR Corporation and certain of its U.S.-based subsidiaries (including American and American Eagle) filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 reorganization in a U.S. Bankruptcy Court. To date, AMR Corporation, through its two
subsidiaries American and American Eagle, operates at 7 of our 12 airports (Aguascalientes, Guanajuato, Guadalajara, Hermosillo, Morelia, Puerto Vallarta and Los Cabos). From January to December 2013, AMR Corporation, through its subsidiaries,
transported 899,116 total passengers at our airports, which corresponds to 3.9% of our passenger traffic in 2013. Therefore, AMR Corporation represents our seventh most important airline group in terms of the number of passengers transported within
our airports. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, aeronautical revenues from AMR Corporation and the passengers they moved through our airports represented 5.4%, 5.1% and 5.5% of our total aeronautical revenues, respectively. On December 9, 2013, AMR
Corporation emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection upon the conjunction of AMR Corporations Plan of Reorganization and merged with U.S. Airways. Upon closing of the merger, AMR Corporation was renewed American Airlines
Group, Inc. As of the date of this report, American and American Eagle have not suspended payments for the services we performed for them during their Chapter 11 process; in addition, they posted a bond of Ps. 41.0 million with us as a
guarantee for such payments.

Complementary Services Customers

Our principal complementary services clients are our three principal providers of baggage handling services, Menzies Aviation, S.A. de C.V.,
Administradora Especializada en Negocios, S.A. de C.V. (a subsidiary of Grupo Aeroméxico) and AGN Aviation Services, S.A. de C.V., which provided Ps. 22.3 million, Ps. 6.0 million and Ps. 6.9 million of the sum of aeronautical
and non-aeronautical revenues, respectively, each in the form of access fees, in 2013. Our primary catering clients are Aerococina, S.A. de C.V. and Gate Gourmet & Maasa México, S. de R.L. de C.V., which provided Ps.
3.5 million and Ps. 1.7 million of revenues, respectively, in the form of access fees, in 2013.

While we receive a fee from our
complementary services clients equivalent to 10% to 15% of their reported sales, we receive only a fixed fee when a company is a subsidiary or affiliate of an airline. Among our three principal providers of baggage handling, Administradora
Especializada en Negocios, S.A. de C.V. is the only subsidiary of airlines.

Principal Non-Aeronautical Services Customers

As of December 31, 2013, we were party to approximately 1,001 contracts  4.5% more than the 958 contracts we were party to as of
December 31, 2012  with providers of commercial services in the commercial spaces in our airports, including retail store operators, duty-free store operators, food and beverage providers, time share developers, financial services
providers, car rental companies, telecommunications providers, VIP lounges, advertising, travel agencies, tourist information and promotion services. The increase in the number of contracts is due to our expansion of commercial spaces within our
existing terminal space and the construction of new terminal space, reflected in an increase in the number of new retail store customers, food & beverage providers and advertising customers. In 2013, our largest commercial customers in
terms of revenues paid to us were Dufry México, S.A. de C.V. (duty-free stores; Ps. 59.3 million), Aldeasa México, S.A. de C.V. (duty-free stores; Ps. 55.8 million), Aerocomidas, S.A. de C.V. (food and beverages; Ps. 35.0 million),
Operadora Aeroboutiques, S.A. de C.V. (retail; Ps. 33.2 million), and Compañía Mexicana de Tiempos Compartidos, S.A. de C.V. (time-share developer; Ps. 16.8 million).



64



---

##### Table of Contents

Seasonality

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. In general, demand for air travel is typically higher during the summer months and during the
winter holiday season, particularly in international markets, because there is more vacation travel during these periods. Our results of operations generally reflect this seasonality, but have also been impacted by numerous other factors that are
not necessarily seasonal, including economic conditions, war or threat of war, terrorism or threat of terrorism, weather, air traffic control delays, health crises and general economic conditions, as well as the other factors discussed above. As a
result, our results of operations for a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for an entire year, and historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.

Competition

Excluding our airports
servicing tourist destinations, our airports generally are natural monopolies in the geographic areas that they serve and generally do not face significant competition.

However, since our Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, La Paz and Manzanillo international airports are substantially dependent on tourism, these
airports face competition from competing tourist destinations. We believe that the main competitors to these airports are those airports serving vacation destinations in Mexico, such as Acapulco and Cancun, and abroad such as in Hawaii, Puerto Rico,
Florida, Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic, other Caribbean islands and Central America.

Additionally, in the future our Los Cabos
airport may experience greater competition from the owner of a small private airport near Cabo San Lucas which received a permit to operate public service in March 2008 from the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. On November 4,
2009, this airport received authorization to operate regular commercial routes for domestic and international flights. During 2009, we commenced certain legal actions in order to preserve our market position, however, once the airport received
authorization to operate commercial flights we could not continue our legal action against it. Therefore, we will implement commercial strategies to improve our level of service in order to ensure that we remain the best airport option for airlines
serving the San Jose del Cabo and Cabo San Lucas corridor. Also, in order to serve the private aviation market, we started operations at our new state-of-the-art Fixed Base of Operations in Los Cabos Airport. This allowed us to increase our
capacity, and we redesigned our fee structure in order to make our service the most attractive in the region. In addition, the Mexican government announced in the National Infrastructure Plan 2007-2012 (Programa Nacional de Infraestructura
2007-2012) (published in July 2007) that at least three new airports would be constructed between 2007 and 2012: the Riviera Maya airport, the Ensenada airport and the Mar de Cortés airport.

On May 12, 2010, the Mexican government began the bidding process for the Riviera Maya airport. The Mexican government received proposals
in April 2011. On April 25, 2011, we submitted a bid, as part of a consortium with Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. On May 20, 2011, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation released a communication saying that all proposals for
this concession were found deficient and voided, including ours. Consequently, the international public bidding process for the construction, administration and operation of the Riviera Maya airport was declared deserted or void. As of the date of
this filing, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation has not announced whether or not there will be a new bidding process for the Riviera Maya airport project.

As of the date of this filing, the government has not provided further information in respect of the Ensenada airport or the Mar de
Cortés airport as to the expected type or size of these airports. In addition, no date has been set to initiate the bidding process for construction of these airports. We cannot predict whether these airports, if they are constructed, will
compete with our airports. Also see Item 3, Risk Factors  Risk Related to the Regulation of our Business  The Mexican government could grant new concessions that compete with our airports.



65



---

##### Table of Contents

The relative attractiveness of the locations we serve is dependent on many factors, some of which
are beyond our control. These factors include the general state of the Mexican economy and the attractiveness of other commercial and industrial centers in Mexico that may affect the attractiveness of Guadalajara, Tijuana and other growing
industrial centers in our group, such as Hermosillo, Leon, Aguascalientes and Mexicali. In addition, with respect to Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, La Paz and Manzanillo, these factors include promotional activities and pricing policies of hotel and
resort operators, weather conditions, natural disasters (such as hurricanes and earthquakes), security concerns, health crises and the development of new resorts that may be considered more attractive. There can be no assurance that the locations we
serve will continue to attract the same level of passenger traffic in the future.

The Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency
currently operates seven small airports in Mexicos Pacific and central regions. We believe that these airports collectively account for only a small fraction of the passenger traffic in these regions.

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Sources of Regulation

The following are the principal laws, regulations and instruments that govern our business and the operation of our airports:



| |  |  | the Mexican Airport Law (Ley de Aeropuertos), enacted December 22, 1995;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the regulations under the Mexican Airport Law (Reglamento de la Ley de Aeropuertos), enacted February 17, 2000;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Mexican Communications Law (Ley de Vías Generales de Comunicación), enacted February 19, 1940;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Mexican Civil Aviation Law (Ley de Aviación Civil), enacted May 12, 1995;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Mexican Federal Duties Law (Ley Federal de Derechos), revised on an annual basis;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Mexican National Assets Law (Ley de Bienes Nacionales), enacted May 20, 2004; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the concessions that entitle our subsidiaries to operate our 12 airports, which were granted on June 29, 1998 and amended on November 15, 1999.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Mexican Airport Law and the regulations under the Mexican Airport Law establish the general framework regulating the construction,
operation, maintenance and development of Mexican airport facilities. The Mexican Airport Laws stated intent is to promote the expansion, development and modernization of Mexicos airport infrastructure by encouraging investment and
competition.

Under the Mexican Airport Law, a concession granted by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation is required to
construct, operate, maintain and develop a public service airport in Mexico. A concession generally must be granted pursuant to a public bidding process, except for: (i) concessions granted to (a) entities considered part of the
federal public administration as defined under Mexican law and (b) any private company the principal shareholder of which is a state or municipal government; (ii) concessions granted to operators of private airports (that have
operated privately for five or more



66



---

##### Table of Contents

years) wishing to begin operating their facilities as public service airports and complying with certain requirements; and (iii) complementary concessions granted to existing concession
holders that comply with certain requirements. Complementary concessions may be granted only under certain limited circumstances, such as where an existing concession holder can demonstrate, among other things, that the award of the complementary
concession is necessary to satisfy passenger demand. On June 29, 1998, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation granted 12 concessions to operate, maintain and develop the 12 principal airports in Mexicos Pacific and central
regions to our subsidiaries. Because our subsidiaries were considered entities of the federal public administration at the time the concessions were granted, the concessions were awarded without a public bidding process. However, the process of
selling 15% of our capital stock to our strategic shareholder pursuant to the privatization process was conducted through a public bidding process. Each of our concessions was amended on November 15, 1999 in order to, among other things,
incorporate each airports maximum rates and certain other terms as part of the concession.

On February 17, 2000, the
regulations under the Mexican Airport Law were issued. We believe we are currently complying with the material requirements of the Mexican Airport Law and its regulations. Non-compliance with these regulations could result in fines or other
sanctions being assessed by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and are among the violations that could result in termination of a concession if they were to occur three or more times.

On May 20, 2004, a new Mexican National Assets Law was adopted and published in the Mexican Federal Gazette that, among other things,
established regulations relating to concessions granted with respect to property held in the public domain, including the airports that we operate. The new Mexican National Assets Law established new grounds for revocation of concessions for failure
to pay applicable taxes, but does not specify which taxes must be paid, including whether certain taxes to municipalities must be paid by a concessionaire.

To the best of our knowledge as of the date hereof, the constitutionality of the new Mexican National Assets Law has not been challenged in
Mexicos court system. If challenged in the future, a court could declare a contested application of a given tax to be void or determine an alternate amount.

Role of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation

The Ministry of Communications and Transportation is the principal regulator of airports in Mexico and is authorized by the Mexican Airport Law
to perform the following functions:



| |  |  | plan, formulate and establish the policies and programs for the development of the national airport system;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | construct, administer and operate airports and airport-related services for the public interest;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | grant, modify and revoke concessions for the operation of airports;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | establish air transit rules and rules regulating take-off and landing schedules through the Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | take all necessary action to create an efficient, competitive and non-discriminatory market for airport-related services, and set forth the minimum operating conditions for airports;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | establish safety regulations;
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | close airports entirely or partially when safety requirements are not being satisfied;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



67



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | monitor airport facilities to determine their compliance with the Mexican Airport Law, other applicable laws and the terms of the concessions;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | maintain the Mexican aeronautical registry for registrations relating to airports;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | impose penalties for failure to observe and perform the rules under the Mexican Airport Law, the regulations thereunder and the concessions;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approve any transaction or transactions that directly or indirectly may result in a change of control of a concession holder;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approve the Master Development Programs prepared by each concession holder every five years;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | determine each airports maximum rates;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | approve any agreements entered into between a concession holder and a third party providing airport or complementary services at its airport; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | perform any other function specified by the Mexican Airport Law.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, under the
Mexican Organic Law of the Federal Public Administration (Ley Orgánica de la Administración Pública Federal), the Mexican Airport Law and the Mexican Civil Aviation Law, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation
is required to provide air traffic control, radio assistance and aeronautical communications at Mexicos airports. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation provides these services through the Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority,
which is a division of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Since 1978, the Mexican air traffic control authority has provided air traffic control for Mexicos airports.

Regulatory Initiatives

The Ministry of
Communications and Transportation intended to establish a new regulatory agency. This new agency was expected to be authorized to monitor our activities and those of the other airport groups, enforce applicable regulations, propose amendments to
concessions, set maximum rates, resolve disputes between concession holders and airport users (such as airlines) and collect and distribute information relating to the airport sector. An initiative was introduced in Mexicos Congress on
February 26, 2009 to establish such an agency and reform a substantial part of the current Mexican Airport Law, but it was rejected by the legislature on April 20, 2010. On December 14, 2011, a new bill was introduced in Mexicos
Congress to amend the Mexican Airport Law. On December 19, 2012, the bill was approved and sent to the Mexican Senate for review. As of the date of this report, the Senate has not voted on the bill. See  Report of the Federal
Competition Commission on Mexicos Airports below.

Concession Tax

Under the Mexican Federal Duties Law, each of our subsidiary concession holders is required to pay the Mexican government a concession tax
based on its gross annual revenues (excluding revenues from improvements to concession assets) from the use of public domain assets pursuant to the terms of its concession. Currently, this concession tax is set at a rate of 5% and may be revised
annually by the Mexican Congress. Our concessions provide that we may request an amendment of our maximum rates if there is a change in this concession tax.



68



---

##### Table of Contents

Scope of Concessions

We hold concessions granted to us by the Mexican government to use, operate, maintain and develop 12 airports in the Pacific and central
regions of Mexico in accordance with the Mexican Airport Law. As authorized under the Mexican Airport Law, each of the concessions is held by our subsidiaries for an initial 50-year term, each of which terms began on November 1, 1998. This
initial term of each of our concessions may be renewed for one or more terms for up to an additional 50 years, subject to the concession holders acceptance of any new conditions imposed by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and
to its compliance with the terms of its concession. Each of the concessions held by our subsidiary concession holders allows the relevant concession holder, during the term of the concession, to: (i) operate, maintain and develop its airport
and carry out any necessary construction in order to render airport, complementary and commercial services as provided under the Mexican Airport Law and the regulations thereunder; and (ii) use and develop the assets that comprise the airport
that is the subject of the concession (consisting of the airports real estate and improvements but excluding assets used in connection with fuel supply and storage). These assets are government-owned assets, subject to the Mexican National
Assets Law. Upon expiration of a concession, these assets, together with any improvements thereto, automatically revert to the Mexican government.

Concession holders are required to provide airport security, which must include contingent and emergency plans in accordance with the
regulations under the Mexican Airport Law. The security regulations must be implemented in accordance with the requirements set forth in the National Program for Airport Security (Plan Nacional de Seguridad Aeroportuaria). In addition, the
regulations pertaining to the Mexican Airport Law specify that an airport concession holder is responsible for inspecting passengers and their carry-on baggage before they reach the departure gates, while the transporting airline is responsible for
the inspection of checked baggage and cargo. If public order or national security is endangered, the responsible federal authorities are authorized to act to protect the safety of aircraft, passengers, cargo, mail, installations and equipment.

The shares of a concession holder and the rights under a concession may be subject to a lien only with the approval of the Ministry of
Communications and Transportation. No agreement documenting liens approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may allow the beneficiary of a pledge to become a concession holder under any circumstances.

A concession holder may not assign any of its rights or obligations under its concession without the authorization of the Ministry of
Communications and Transportation. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation is authorized to consent to an assignment only if the proposed assignee satisfies the requirements to be a concession holder under the Mexican Airport Law,
undertakes to comply with the obligations under the relevant concession and agrees to any other conditions that the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may require.

General Obligations of Concession Holders

The concessions impose certain obligations on the concession holders, including, among others: (i) the obligation to pay the concession
tax described above, (ii) the obligation to deliver concession services in a continuous, public and non-discriminatory manner, (iii) the obligation to maintain the airports in good working condition and (iv) the obligation to make
investments with respect to the infrastructure and equipment in accordance with the Master Development Programs and the concessions.

Each
concession holder and any third party providing services at an airport is required to carry insurance in specified amounts and covering specified risks, such as damage to persons and property at the airport, in each case as specified by the Ministry
of Communications and Transportation. To date, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation has not specified the required amounts of insurance. We may be required to obtain additional insurance once these amounts are specified.



69



---

##### Table of Contents

We and our subsidiary concession holders are jointly and severally liable to the Ministry of
Communications and Transportation for the performance of all obligations under the concessions held by our subsidiaries. Each of our subsidiary concession holders is responsible for the performance of the obligations set forth in its concession and
in the Master Development Programs, including the obligations arising from third-party contracts, as well as for any damages to the Mexican government-owned assets that they use and to third-party airport users. In the event of a breach of the
concession held by any one of our subsidiaries, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation is entitled to revoke the concessions held by all of our subsidiaries.

Substantially all of the contracts entered into prior to August 25, 1999 by the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency with
respect to each of our airports were assigned to the relevant concession holder for each airport. As part of this assignment, each concession holder agreed to indemnify the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency for any loss suffered by the
Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency due to the concession holders breach of its obligations under an assigned agreement.

Classification of Services Provided at Airports

The Mexican Airport Law and the regulations thereunder classify the services that may be rendered at an airport into the following three
categories:



| |  |  | Airport Services. Airport services may be rendered only by the holder of a concession or a third party that has entered into an agreement with the concession holder to provide such services. These services
include the following:
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the use of airport runways, taxiways and aprons for landing, aircraft parking and departure;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the use of hangars, passenger walkways, transport buses and car parking facilities;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the provision of airport security services, rescue and firefighting services, ground traffic control, lighting and visual aids;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the general use of terminal space and other infrastructure by aircraft, passengers and cargo; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the provision of access to an airport to third parties providing complementary services (as defined in the Mexican Airport Law) and third parties providing permanent ground transportation services (such as taxis).
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Complementary Services. Complementary services may be rendered by an airline, by the airport operator or by a third party under agreements with airlines and the airport operator. These services include: ramp and
handling services, passenger check-in, aircraft security, catering, cleaning, maintenance, repair and fuel supply and related activities that provide support to air carriers.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Commercial Services. Commercial services are services that are not considered essential to the operation of an airport or aircraft, and include, among other things, retailers, restaurants, banks and advertisers
to which we lease space.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



70



---

##### Table of Contents

A third party providing complementary or commercial services to an airport is required to do so
only pursuant to a written agreement with the relevant concession holder. On November 1, 2012, we entered into an agreement with a third party with respect to the provision of airbus and passenger walkway services in all of our airports.
Accordingly, we will no longer provide these services directly. As of the date of this report, this is the only agreement with a third party regarding the provision of regulated services. All agreements relating to airport or complementary services
are required to be approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The Mexican Airport Law provides that the concession holder is jointly liable with these third parties for compliance with the terms of the relevant concession with
respect to the services provided by such third parties. All third-party service providers are required to be corporations incorporated under Mexican law.

Airport and complementary services are required to be provided to all users in a uniform and regular manner, without discrimination as to
quality, access or price. Concession holders are required to provide airport and complementary services on a priority basis to military aircraft, disaster support aircraft and aircraft experiencing emergencies. Airport and complementary services are
required to be provided at no cost to military aircraft and aircraft performing national security activities. The concession holders have not and do not provide complementary services, as these services are provided by third parties.

In the event of force majeure, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may impose additional regulations governing the
provision of services at airports, but only to the extent necessary to address the force majeure event. The Mexican Airport Law allows the airport administrator appointed by a concession holder to suspend the provision of airport services in
the event of force majeure.

A concession holder is also required to allow for a competitive market for complementary services. A
concession holder may only limit the number of providers of complementary services in its airport due to space, efficiency and safety considerations. If the number of complementary service providers must be limited due to these considerations,
contracts for the provision of complementary services must be awarded through competitive bidding processes.

Master Development Programs

Each concession holder is required to submit to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation a Master Development Program describing,
among other things, the concession holders construction and maintenance plans.

Each Master Development Program is required to be
updated every five years and resubmitted for approval to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Upon such approval, the Master Development Program is deemed to constitute a part of the relevant concession. Any major construction,
renovation or expansion of an airport may only be made with the approval of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, typically provided pursuant to a concession holders Master Development Program. Information required to be presented
in the Master Development Program includes:



| |  |  | airport growth and development expectations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 15-year projections for air traffic demand (including passenger, cargo and operations);
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | construction, conservation, maintenance, expansion and modernization programs for infrastructure, facilities and equipment;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a binding five-year detailed investment program and planned major investments for the following ten years;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



71



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | descriptive airport plans specifying the distinct uses for the corresponding airport areas;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any financing sources; and
| | - |  | --------------------------



| |  |  | environmental protection measures.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------

Each concession provides for a 24-month period for the
preparation and submission of the concession holders Master Development Program, and requires the concession holder to engage recognized independent consultants to conduct polls among airport users with respect to current and expected quality
standards and to prepare air traffic projections and assess investment requirements. The concession holder must submit a draft of the Master Development Program to an operations committee (Comité de Operación y Horarios),
composed of each of the airports principal users, for their review and comments six months prior to its submission for approval to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Further, the concession holder must submit, six months prior
to the expiration of the five-year term, the new Master Development Program to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation may request additional information or clarification as well as seek
further comments from airport users. The Ministry of Defense (Secretaría de Defensa Nacional) may also opine on the Master Development Programs.

Any major construction project, renovation or expansion relating to an airport can only be done pursuant to the Master Development Program of
the concession holder or with the approval of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. We are required to spend the full amounts set forth in each investment program under our Master Development Programs.

Changes to a Master Development Program including the related investment program require the approval of the Ministry of Communications and
Transportation, except for emergency repairs and minor works that do not adversely affect an airports operations.

Once the
capital expenditures related with the Master Development Programs are established, it is adjusted annually according to the increases in the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment
(Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor, sector construcción, materiales, alquiler de maquinaria y remuneraciones), and the concessionaire is obligated to meet the adjusted amounts.

In December 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation approved the Master Development Programs for each of our subsidiary
concession holders for the 2010-2014 period. We allocated 83.6% of our investments for the 2010-2014 period to the Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Tijuana airports. Our Master Development Programs for the 2015-2019 period will be
reviewed by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation in the second quarter of 2014, and we expect to receive the Ministrys approval by the end of 2014.

Our Master Development Programs are approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation for periods of five years, as stated in our
concessions. We are required to comply with the five-year period investment obligations under the Master Development Programs, and the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may apply sanctions if we do not so comply. Recently, the Ministry
of Communications and Transportation has reviewed our compliance on an annual basis. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation may choose to do this revision officially and apply sanctions on an annual basis if it determines that we have
failed in our investment obligations. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation has certified our compliance with our Master Development Program through 2012. As of the date of this filing, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation
has not completed our certification process for 2013, which we expect to obtain in the second quarter of 2014.



72



---

##### Table of Contents

Aeronautical Services Regulation

The Mexican Airport Law directs the Ministry of Communications and Transportation to establish price regulations for services for which
there is no competitive market, as determined by the Mexican Antitrust Commission. In 1999, the Mexican Antitrust Commission issued a ruling stating that competitive markets generally do not exist for airport services and airport access provided to
third parties rendering complementary services. This ruling authorized the Ministry of Communications and Transportation to establish regulations governing the prices that may be charged for airport services and access fees that may be charged to
third parties rendering complementary services in our airports. On November 15, 1999, a new regulation, the Rate Regulation (Regulación Tarifaria), was incorporated within the terms of each of our concessions. This regulation
provides a framework for the setting by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation of five-year maximum rates.

Regulated Revenues

The majority of our revenues are derived from providing aeronautical services, which generally are related to the use of airport
facilities by airlines and passengers and principally consist of a fee for each departing passenger, aircraft landing fees based on an aircrafts weight and arrival time, an aircraft parking fee, a fee for the transfer of passengers from an
aircraft to the terminal building, a security charge for each departing passenger and the leasing of space and access fees collected from third parties that provide complementary services at our airports.

Since January 1, 2000, all of our revenues from aeronautical services have been subject to a price regulation system established by the
Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Under this price regulation system, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation establishes a maximum rate for each airport for every year in a five-year period. The maximum rate is the maximum
amount of revenues per workload unit that may be earned at an airport each year from regulated revenue sources. Under this regulation, a workload unit is equivalent to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo. We are able to set
the specific prices for each aeronautical service every six months (or more frequently if accumulated inflation since the last adjustment exceeds 5%), as long as the combined revenues from regulated services at an airport do not exceed the maximum
rate per workload unit at that airport. Each year, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation certifies that our regulated revenues divided by workload units are equal to or below the established maximum rate for the period. For the five-year
period from 2005 to 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation certified that we have not collected revenues in excess of the permitted levels. The Ministry of Communications and Transportation also has reviewed our maximum rates and
certified that we have not collected revenues in excess of the permitted level for through 2012. The review for 2013 will take place during the second quarter of 2014. Since our aggregate revenues resulting from regulated services are not otherwise
restricted, increases in passenger and cargo traffic permit greater revenues overall within each five-year interval for which maximum rates are established.

In 2011, 2012 and 2013, approximately 62.3%, 68.1% and 69.2%, respectively, of our total revenues were earned from aeronautical services
subject to price regulation under our maximum rates (78.9%, 76.9% and 75.5%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues were earned from aeronautical services subject to price regulation under our maximum rates).

Our revenues from non-aeronautical services, including revenues that we earn from most commercial activities in our terminals, are not
regulated under our maximum-rate price regulation system and are therefore not subject to a ceiling under any regulation. For a description of how we classify our revenues into aeronautical and non-aeronautical services, see Item 5,
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Classification of Revenues.



73



---

##### Table of Contents

Maximum Rates

Each airports maximum rate is determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation based on a general framework established in
our concessions. This framework reflects, among other factors, projections of an airports revenues, operating costs and capital expenditures, as well as the estimated cost of capital related to regulated services and projected annual
efficiency adjustments determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The schedule of maximum rates for each airport is established every five years.

Maximum Rates for 2010 through 2014

In December 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation set new airport maximum rates for the five-year period from
January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014. The following table sets forth the maximum rates for each of our airports under the Master Development Programs that went into effect as of January 1, 2010. These maximum rates are subject to
adjustment only as described above or under the limited circumstances described below under Special Adjustments to Maximum Rates.

Current Maximum Rates(1)



|                |  |                         |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        |  |  |      |        |  |  |  |        | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---- |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------ |  |  | ---- | ------ |  |  |  | ------ | 
|                |  | Year ended December 31, |       
|                |  | 2010                    |        |  | 2011 |  |        | 2012 |  |  | 2013   |  |  | 2014 |       
|Guadalajara     |  |                         | 112.00 |  |      |  | 111.22 |      |  |  | 110.44 |  |  |      | 109.66 |  |  |  | 108.90 | 
|Tijuana         |  |                         | 99.18  |  |      |  | 98.49  |      |  |  | 97.80  |  |  |      | 97.11  |  |  |  | 96.43  | 
|Los Cabos       |  |                         | 143.14 |  |      |  | 142.14 |      |  |  | 141.14 |  |  |      | 140.16 |  |  |  | 139.17 | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                         | 137.91 |  |      |  | 136.94 |      |  |  | 135.98 |  |  |      | 135.03 |  |  |  | 134.09 | 
|Hermosillo      |  |                         | 97.63  |  |      |  | 96.95  |      |  |  | 96.27  |  |  |      | 95.60  |  |  |  | 94.93  | 
|Guanajuato      |  |                         | 130.69 |  |      |  | 129.77 |      |  |  | 128.87 |  |  |      | 127.96 |  |  |  | 127.07 | 
|La Paz          |  |                         | 122.34 |  |      |  | 121.48 |      |  |  | 120.63 |  |  |      | 119.79 |  |  |  | 118.95 | 
|Mexicali        |  |                         | 99.65  |  |      |  | 98.95  |      |  |  | 98.26  |  |  |      | 97.57  |  |  |  | 96.89  | 
|Aguascalientes  |  |                         | 113.38 |  |      |  | 112.59 |      |  |  | 111.80 |  |  |      | 111.02 |  |  |  | 110.24 | 
|Morelia         |  |                         | 136.01 |  |      |  | 135.06 |      |  |  | 134.11 |  |  |      | 133.17 |  |  |  | 132.24 | 
|Los Mochis      |  |                         | 116.85 |  |      |  | 116.03 |      |  |  | 115.22 |  |  |      | 114.41 |  |  |  | 113.61 | 
|Manzanillo      |  |                         | 128.37 |  |      |  | 127.47 |      |  |  | 126.58 |  |  |      | 125.69 |  |  |  | 124.81 | 



|(1) | Expressed in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007 (applying the efficiency factor year over year).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology for Determining Future Maximum Rates

The Rate Regulation provides that each airports annual maximum rates are to be determined in five-year intervals based on the following
variables:



| |  |  | Projections for the following fifteen years of workload units, operating costs and expenses related to services subject to price regulation and pre-tax earnings from services subject to price regulation. The concessions
provide that projections for workload units and expenses related to regulated services are to be derived from the terms of the relevant concession holders Master Development Program for the following fifteen years;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Projections for the following fifteen years of capital expenditures related to regulated services, based on air traffic forecasts and quality standards for services to be derived from the Master Development Programs;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Reference values, which initially were established in the concessions and are designed to reflect the net present value of the regulated revenues minus the corresponding regulated operating costs and expenses (excluding
amortization and depreciation), and capital expenditures related to the provision of regulated services plus a terminal value;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



74



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | A discount rate to be determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The concessions provide that the discount rate shall reflect the cost of capital to Mexican and international companies in the
airport industry (on a pre-tax basis), as well as Mexican economic conditions. The concessions provide that the discount rate shall be at least equal to the average yield of long-term Mexican government debt securities quoted in the international
markets during the 24 months prior to the date of the negotiations plus a risk premium to be determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation based on the inherent risk of the airport business in Mexico; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | An efficiency factor to be determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The maximum rates applicable to our airports reflect a projected annual efficiency improvement of 0.75% for the five-year
period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2009 and 0.70% for the five-year period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our concessions specify a discounted cash flow formula to be used by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation to determine the
maximum rates that, given the projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, capital expenditures and discount rate, would result in a net present value equal to the reference values established in connection with the last
determination of maximum rates. We prepared a proposal to submit to the Ministry of Communications and Transportation establishing the values we believe should be used with respect to each variable included in the determination of maximum rates,
including the efficiency factor, projected capital expenditures and the discount rate. The maximum rates ultimately established by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation historically have resulted from a negotiation between the Ministry
of Communications and Transportation and us regarding these variables. Once the maximum rates are established, they must be adjusted each year by the efficiency factor and by the Mexican Producer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Precios al
Productor) excluding petroleum. Also, once the maximum rates are established based in part on the capital expenditures included in our Master Development Programs, the capital expenditures must be adjusted according to the Mexican Producer Price
Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees segment (Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor, sector construcción, materiales, alquiler de maquinaria y remuneraciones).

The concessions provide that each airports reference values and discount rate and the other variables used in calculating the maximum
rates do not in any manner represent an undertaking by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation or the Mexican government as to the profitability of any concession holder. Therefore, whether or not the maximum rates (or the amounts up to
the maximum rates that we are able to collect) multiplied by workload units at any airport generate a profit or exceed our profit estimates, or reflect the actual profitability, discount rates, capital expenditures or productivity gains at that
airport over the five-year period, we are not entitled to any adjustment to compensate for any shortfall.

To the extent that such
aggregate revenues per workload unit exceed the relevant maximum rate, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation may proportionately reduce the maximum rate in the immediately subsequent year and assess penalties equivalent to 1,000 to
50,000 times the general minimum wage in the Federal District (Mexico City). On January 1, 2014, the daily minimum wage in Mexico City was Ps. 67.29. As a result, the maximum penalty at such date could have been Ps. 3.4 million
(U.S.$ 260,000) per airport.



75



---

##### Table of Contents

As established by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, the calculation of workload
units does not include transit passengers for subsequent years. The current workload unit calculation is therefore equal to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo.

Special Adjustments to Maximum Rates

Once determined, each airports maximum rates are subject to special adjustment only under the following circumstances:



| |  |  | Change in law or natural disasters.A concession holder may request an adjustment in its maximum rates if a change in law with respect to quality standards or safety and environmental protection results in
operating costs or capital expenditures that were not contemplated when its maximum rates were determined. In addition, a concession holder may also request an adjustment in its maximum rates if a natural disaster affects demand or requires
unanticipated capital expenditures. There can be no assurance that any request on these grounds would be approved.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Macroeconomic conditions.A concession holder may request an adjustment in its maximum rates if, as a result of a decrease of at least 5% in Mexican gross domestic product in a 12-month period, the workload units
processed in the concession holders airport are less than those projected when its Master Development Program was approved. To grant an adjustment under these circumstances, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation must have already
allowed the concession holder to decrease its projected capital improvements under its Master Development Program as a result of the decline in passenger traffic volume. There can be no assurance that any request on these grounds would be approved.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increase in concession tax under Mexican Federal Duties Law.An increase in duty payable by a concession holder under the Mexican Federal Duties Law entitles the concession holder to request an adjustment in its
maximum rates. There can be no assurance that any request on these grounds would be approved.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Failure to make required investments or improvements.The Ministry of Communications and Transportation annually reviews each concession holders compliance with its Master Development Program (including the
provision of services and the making of capital investments). If a concession holder fails to satisfy any of the investment commitments contained in its Master Development Program, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation is entitled to
decrease the concession holders maximum rates and assess penalties.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Excess revenues.In the event that revenues subject to price regulation per workload unit in any year exceed the applicable maximum rate, the maximum rate for the following year will be decreased to compensate
airport users for overpayment in the previous year. Under these circumstances, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation is also entitled to assess penalties against the concession holder.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ownership Commitments and Restrictions

The concessions require us to retain a 51% direct ownership interest in each of our 12 concession holders throughout the term of these
concessions. Any acquisition by us or by one of our concession holders of any additional airport concessions or of a beneficial interest of 30% or more of another concession holder requires the consent of the Mexican Antitrust Commission. In
addition, the concessions prohibit us and our concession holders, collectively or individually, from acquiring more than one concession for the operation of an airport along each of Mexicos southern and northern borders.



76



---

##### Table of Contents

Air carriers are prohibited under the Mexican Airport Law from controlling or beneficially owning
5% or more of the shares of a holder of an airport concession. We, and each of our subsidiaries, are similarly restricted from owning 5% or more of the shares of any air carrier.

Foreign governments acting in a sovereign capacity are prohibited from owning any direct or indirect equity interest in a holder of an airport
concession.

Reporting, Information and Consent Requirements

Concession holders and third parties providing services at airports are required to provide the Ministry of Communications and Transportation
access to all airport facilities and information relating to an airports construction, operation, maintenance and development. Each concession holder is obligated to maintain statistical records of operations and air traffic movements in its
airport and to provide the Ministry of Communications and Transportation with any information that it may request. Each concession holder is also required to publish its annual audited financial statements in a principal Mexican newspaper within the
first four months of each year.

The Mexican Airport Law provides that any person or group directly or indirectly acquiring control of a
concession holder is required to obtain the consent of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation for such control acquisition. For purposes of this requirement, control is deemed to be acquired in the following circumstances:



| |  |  | if a person acquires 35% or more of the shares of a concession holder;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | if a person has the ability to control the outcome of meetings of the shareholders of a concession holder;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | if a person has the ability to appoint a majority of the members of the board of directors of a concession holder; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | if a person by any other means acquires control of an airport.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to the regulations
under the Mexican Airport Law, any company acquiring control of a concession holder is deemed to be jointly and severally liable with the concession holder for the performance of the terms and conditions of the concession.

The Ministry of Communications and Transportation requires notification upon any change in a concession holders chief executive officer,
board of directors or management. A concession holder is also required to notify the Ministry of Communications and Transportation at least 90 days prior to the adoption of any amendment to its bylaws concerning the dissolution, corporate purpose,
merger, transformation or spin-off of the concession holder.

Penalties and Termination and Revocation of Concessions and Concession Assets

Termination of Concessions

Under
the Mexican Airport Law and the terms of the concessions, a concession may be terminated upon any of the following events:



| |  |  | the expiration of its term;
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | its surrender by the concession holder;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



77



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | the revocation of the concession by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the reversion (rescate) of the Mexican government-owned assets that are the subject of the concession (principally real estate, improvements and other infrastructure);
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the inability to achieve the purpose of the concession, except in the event of force majeure;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the dissolution, liquidation or bankruptcy of the concession holder; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the failure by the concession holder to satisfy the shareholding obligations set forth in the concession.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following a concessions termination, the concession holder remains liable for the performance of its obligations during the term of the
concession.

Revocation of Concessions

A concession may be revoked by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation under certain conditions, including:



| |  |  | the failure by a concession holder to operate, maintain and develop an airport pursuant to the terms established in the concession;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the failure by a concession holder to maintain insurance as required under the Mexican Airport Law;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the assignment, encumbrance, transfer or sale of a concession, any of the rights thereunder or the assets underlying the concession in violation of the Mexican Airport Law;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any alteration of the nature or condition of an airports facilities without the authorization of the Ministry of Communications and Transportation;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | use, with a concession holders consent or without the approval of air traffic control authorities, of an airport by any aircraft that does not comply with the requirements of the Mexican Civil Aviation Law, that
has not been authorized by the Mexican Air Traffic Control Authority, or that is involved in the commission of a felony;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | knowingly appointing a chief executive officer or board member of a concession holder that is not qualified to perform his functions under the law as a result of having violated criminal laws;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the failure by the concession holder to pay the Mexican government the airport concession tax;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | failure to own at least 51% of the capital stock of subsidiary concession holders;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | violation of the safety regulations established in the Mexican Airport Law and other applicable laws;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



78



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | total or partial interruption of the operation of an airport or its airport or complementary services without justified cause;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the failure to maintain an airports facilities;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the provision of unauthorized services;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | the failure to indemnify a third party for damages caused by the provision of services by the concession holder or a third-party service provider;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | charging prices higher than those registered with the Ministry of Communications and Transportation for regulated services or exceeding the applicable maximum rate;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any act or omission that impedes the ability of other service providers or authorities to carry out their functions within an airport; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any other failure to comply with the Mexican Airport Law, its regulations and the terms of a concession.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Ministry of Communications and Transportation is entitled to revoke a concession without prior notice as a result of the first six events
described above. In the case of other violations, a concession may be revoked as a result of a violation only if sanctions have been imposed at least three times with respect to the same violation.

Pursuant to the terms of our concessions, in the event the Ministry of Communications and Transportation revokes one of our concessions, it is
entitled to revoke all of our concessions.

According to the Mexican National Assets Law, the surface area of our airports and
improvements on such space are government-owned assets. A concession concerning government-owned assets may be rescued, or revert to the Mexican government prior to the concessions expiration, when considered necessary for the
public interest. In exchange, the Mexican government is required to pay compensation as determined by expert appraisers. Following a declaration of reversion (rescate), the assets that were subject to the concession are automatically returned
to the Mexican government.

In the event of war, public disturbances or threats to national security, the Mexican government may assume
the operation (requisa) of any airport, airport and complementary services as well as any other airport assets. Such government action may exist only during the duration of the emergency. Except in the case of war, the Mexican federal
government is required to compensate all affected parties for any damages or losses suffered as a result of such government action. If the Mexican government and a concession holder cannot agree as to the appropriate amount of damages or losses, the
amount of damages must be determined by experts jointly appointed by both parties and the amount of losses must be determined based on the average net income of the concession holder during the previous year.

The Mexican Airport Law provides that a sanction of up to 200,000 times the minimum daily wage in Mexico City may be assessed for a failure to
comply with the law or terms of a concession. Such sanction may be duplicated in the event of reiterative failures to comply. As a result, the maximum penalty on January 1, 2014 was Ps. 13.5 million (U.S.$ 1.0 million) for an individual
failure to comply.



79



---

##### Table of Contents

Consequences of Termination or Revocation of a Concession

Upon termination, whether as a result of expiration or revocation, the real estate and fixtures that were the subject of the concession
automatically revert to the Mexican government. In addition, upon termination, the Mexican federal government has a preemptive right to acquire all other assets used by the concession holder to provide services under the concession at prices
determined by expert appraisers appointed by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Alternatively, the Mexican government may elect to lease these assets for up to five years at fair market rates as determined by expert appraisers
appointed by the Mexican government and the concession holder. In the event of a discrepancy between appraisals, a third expert appraiser must be jointly appointed by the Mexican government and the concession holder. If the concession holder does
not appoint an expert appraiser, or if such appraiser fails to determine a price, the determination of the appraiser appointed by the Mexican government will be conclusive. If the Mexican government chooses to lease the assets, it may thereafter
purchase the assets at their fair market value, as determined by an expert appraiser appointed by the Mexican government.

The Mexican
Communications Law, however, provides that upon expiration, termination or revocation of a concession, all assets necessary to operate the airports will revert to the Mexican government, at no cost and free of any liens or other encumbrances. There
is substantial doubt as to whether the provisions of our concessions would prevail over those of the Mexican Communications Law. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that upon expiration or termination of our concessions the assets used by our
subsidiary concession holders to provide services at our airports will not revert to the Mexican government, free of charge, together with government-owned assets and improvements permanently attached thereto.

Grants of New Concessions

The
Mexican government may grant new concessions to manage, operate, develop and construct airports. Such concessions may be granted through a public bidding process in which bidders must demonstrate their technical, legal, managerial and financial
capabilities. The Federal Competition Commission has the power, under certain circumstances, to prohibit a party from bidding and to cancel an award after the process has concluded. In addition, the government may grant concessions without a public
bidding process to the following entities:



| |  |  | any person who holds a permit to operate a civil aerodrome and intends to transform the aerodrome into an airport so long as: (i) the proposed change is consistent with the national airport development programs and
policies, (ii) the civil aerodrome has been in continuous operation for the previous five years and (iii) the permit holder complies with all requirements of the concession;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a current concession holder when necessary to meet increased demand so long as: (i) a new airport is necessary to increase existing capacity, (ii) the operation of both airports by a single concession holder
is more efficient than other options and (iii) the concession holder complies with all requirements of the concession;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a current concession holder when it is in the public interest for its airport to be relocated;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | entities in the federal public administration; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | commercial entities in which local or municipal governments have a majority equity interest if the entities corporate purpose is to manage, operate, develop and/or construct airports.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Environmental Regulation

Our operations are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.
The major federal environmental laws applicable to our operations are: (i) the General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (Ley General de Equilibrio



80



---

##### Table of Contents

Ecológico y Protección Ambiental, or the General Environmental Law) and its regulations, which are administered by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources
(Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) and enforced by the Ministrys enforcement branch, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment (Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente);
(ii) the General Law for the Prevention and Integral Management of Waste (Ley General para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos, or the Law on Waste), which is also administered by the Ministry of the
Environment and Natural Resources and enforced by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment; and (iii) the National Waters Law (Ley de Aguas Nacionales) and its regulations, which are administered and enforced by the
National Waters Commission (Comisión Nacional del Agua), also a branch of the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources.

Under the General Environmental Law, regulations have been enacted concerning air pollution, environmental impact, land use, soil
contamination, noise control, hazardous waste, environmental audits and natural protected areas. The General Environmental Law also regulates, among other things, vibrations, thermal energy and visual pollution, although the Mexican government has
not yet issued enforceable regulation on the majority of these matters. The General Environmental Law also provides that companies that contaminate soils are responsible for their clean-up. Further, according to the Law on Waste, owners and/or
possessors of property with soil contamination are jointly and severally liable for the remediation of such contaminated sites, irrespective of any recourse or other actions such owners and/or possessors may have against the contaminating party, and
aside from the criminal or administrative liability to which the contaminating party may be subject. Restrictions on the transfer of contaminated sites also exist. The Law on Waste also regulates the generation, handling and final disposal of
hazardous waste.

Pursuant to the National Waters Law, companies that discharge waste waters into national water bodies must comply with,
among other requirements, maximum permissible contaminant levels in order to preserve water quality. Periodic reports on water quality must be provided to competent authorities. Liability may result from the contamination of underground waters or
recipient water bodies. The use of underground waters is subject to restrictions pursuant to our concessions and the National Waters Commission.

In addition to the foregoing, Mexican Official Norms (Normas Oficiales Mexicanas, or NOMs), which are technical standards
issued by competent regulatory authorities pursuant to the General Normalization Law (Ley General de Metrología y Normalización) and the General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (Ley General del
Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente), establish limits on air emissions, waste water discharges, the generation, handling and disposal of hazardous waste and noise control, among other matters.

The General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al
Ambiente), and the General Law for the Prevention and Integral Management of Waste (Ley General para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos, or the Law on Waste) establish the main policies for soil remediation.
Remediation standards and procedures are gradually beginning to be implemented through Mexican Official Norms (NOMs).

Although not
enforceable, the internal administrative criteria on soil contamination of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment are widely used as guidance in cases where soil remediation, restoration or clean-up is required.

The Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales) and the Federal Office
for the Protection of the Environment (Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente) are the responsible regulators. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment can bring administrative, civil and criminal
proceedings against companies that



81



---

##### Table of Contents

violate environmental laws, and it also has the power to close non-complying facilities and impose a variety of sanctions. Companies in Mexico are required to obtain proper authorizations,
licenses, concessions or permits from competent environmental authorities for the performance of activities that may have an impact on the environment or that may constitute a source of contamination. Companies in Mexico are also required to comply
with a variety of reporting obligations that include, among others, providing the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment and the National Waters Commission, as applicable, with
periodic reports regarding compliance with various environmental laws.

Prior to the opening of Mexicos airports to private
investment, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment required that environmental audits had to be performed at each of our airports. Based on the results of these audits, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment
issued recommendations for improvements and corrective actions to be taken at each of our airports. In connection with the transfer of the management of our airports from our predecessor, we entered into environmental compliance agreements with the
Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment on January 1, 1999 and July 12, 2000 pursuant to which we agreed to comply with a specific action plan and adopt specific actions within a determined time frame.

The Federal Office for the Protection of the Environment has confirmed that we have complied with all of the relevant environmental
requirements derived from the aforementioned environmental audits and has issued compliance certificates for all of our airports. These certificates, which are known as Environmental Quality Certificates (Certificados de Calidad Ambiental)
certify compliance with applicable Mexican environmental laws, regulations and applicable Mexican Official Norms and must be renewed periodically.

During 2013, our environmental management system has been re-certificated at our Aguascalientes, Hermosillo, Los Mochis, Guanajuato, La Paz
and Morelia airports under ISO 14001:2004. With these certifications, we now have six airports operating under our environmental management system.

In June 2013, a decree was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation (Diario Oficial de la Federación) issuing the
Federal Environmental Responsibility Law (Ley Federal de Responsabilidad Ambiental). As part of the Federal Environmental Responsibility Law, various provisions were amended, added and revoked of the General Law of Ecological Equilibrium and
Protection of the Environment, the General Law of Wildlife, the General Law for the Comprehensive Prevention and Waste Management, the General Law for Sustainable Forest Development, the National Water Act, and the Federal Criminal Code, among
others, to the effect that any person or company whose acts or omissions directly or indirectly causes harm to the natural environment, is obligated to repair the environmental damage, or when reparation is not possible, to compensate for the harm,
and undertake any necessary actions to avoid increasing the harm. A second general aspect of this reform is the creation of expanded standing so that individuals, including Mexican environmental non-profits, may initiate lawsuits for the protection
of property that they do not directly own.

Liability for Environmental Noncompliance

The legal framework of environmental liability applicable to our operations is generally outlined above. Under the terms of our concessions,
the Mexican government has agreed to indemnify us for any environmental liabilities arising prior to November 1, 1998 and for any failure by the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency prior to November 1, 1998 to comply with
applicable environmental laws and with its agreements with Mexican environmental authorities. Although there can be no assurance, we



82



---

##### Table of Contents

believe that we are entitled to indemnification for any liabilities related to the actions our predecessor was required to perform or refrain from performing under applicable environmental laws
and under its agreements with environmental authorities. For further information regarding these liabilities, see Note 26 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

The level of environmental regulation in Mexico has significantly increased in recent years, and the enforcement of environmental laws is
becoming substantially more stringent. We expect this trend to continue and expect additional norms to be imposed by the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation entered into by Canada, the United States and Mexico in the context of the
North American Free Trade Agreement, as well as by other international treaties on environmental matters. We do not expect that compliance with Mexican federal, state or municipal environmental laws currently in effect will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that environmental regulations or the enforcement thereof will not change in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, prospects or financial condition.

Report of the Federal Competition Commission on Mexicos Airports

On October 1, 2007, the Chairman of Federal Competition Commission (Comisión Federal de Competencia, or the Competition
Commission) released an independent report on the competitiveness of Mexicos airports relative to each other and to international airports. The report alleged that, between 2001 and 2007, operating income (expressed as a percentage of total
revenues) of Mexican airports was relatively high when compared with a sample of fifty international airports. In addition, the report suggested that aeronautical services charges at Mexican airports were more expensive than at most of the fifty
comparison airports. The report also claimed that operating income at Mexican airports had increased principally as a result of increased passenger traffic, rather than increases in operating efficiency. To that end, the Competition Commission
Chairmans report made the following recommendations as ways to increase efficiency at Mexican airports:



| |  |  | make economic efficiency a basis of tariff regulation for new concessions;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | include commercial services income as one of the factors in determining tariffs for new concessions;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | strengthen the independence of the regulatory agency, and increase the transparency of airport regulation;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | promote greater efficiency in scheduling at saturated airports;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | promote greater competition between airports;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | eliminate the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agencys, or ASA, role as exclusive fuel service provider;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | eliminate barriers to entry for taxi providers at airports; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | be mindful of vertical integration among airports and airlines.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

The Ministry of
Communications and Transportation issued a response to the Competition Commission Chairmans report that noted, among other matters, that according to its own calculations, Mexicos airport charges were lower than 36 of the 50
international airports against which they were compared. We also issued a joint press release along with the other two Mexican airport groups, Grupo



83



---

##### Table of Contents

Aeroportuario del Sureste and Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, questioning the calculations and the comparisons drawn in the Competition Commission Chairmans report and stating that we
are committed to participating in a comprehensive review of the report in order to demonstrate our commitment to the efficient development of the airport sector.

In addition, initiatives in the past have been introduced in the Mexican Congress to make certain reforms to the Mexican Airport Law that, if
enacted, could have a material adverse effect on us. Most recently, on December 14, 2011, a bill was introduced in Mexicos Congress to amend the Mexican Airport Law, which bill was approved and sent to the Senate for review on
December 19, 2012. Among other items, the bill proposes that the Ministry of Communications and Transportation will gain additional authority to plan and apply the standards, policies and programs for the Mexican airport system, to oversee the
correct operation of civil aviation in Mexico, and to establish rules for airport service providers and the general basis for flight schedules, so as to guarantee the competitiveness of Mexicos airports. As of the date of this report the
Senate has not voted on the bill. We cannot predict whether the bill will be approved by the Senate or, if approved, the impact it would have on us.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

We have 16 subsidiaries in Mexico: one operating subsidiary for each of our 12 airports, along with two subsidiaries (SIAP and CORSA) that
provide administrative and operational services and one subsidiary (PCP) that provides parking services across our 12 airports. Additionally, in 2013, we established a non-profit company whose function will be the solicitation and management of
charitable donations in order to support activities to increase social welfare in the communities near our airports and to support other organizations with similar charitable purposes. In 2010, another subsidiary, Pacific GA Partipacoes do Brasil
LTDA, was established in Brazil; however, this subsidiary has thus far remained inactive and has no capital contributions.

The following
table sets forth our subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013.



|                                              |  |                             |  |                     |  |                                                           
|--------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Company                               |  | Jurisdictionof Organization |  | PercentageOwned (1) |  | Description                                               
|Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V.       |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Guadalajara International Airport    
|Aeropuerto de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V.           |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Tijuana International Airport        
|Aeropuerto de Puerto Vallarta, S.A. de C.V.   |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Puerto Vallarta International Airport
|Aeropuerto de San José del Cabo, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Los Cabos International Airport      
|Aeropuerto de Hermosillo, S.A. de C.V.        |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Hermosillo International Airport     
|Aeropuerto del Bajío, S.A. de C.V.            |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Guanajuato International Airport     
|Aeropuerto de Morelia, S.A. de C.V.           |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Morelia International Airport        
|Aeropuerto de La Paz, S.A. de C.V.            |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for La Paz International Airport         
|Aeropuerto de Aguascalientes, S.A. de C.V.    |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Aguascalientes International Airport 
|Aeropuerto de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.          |  | Mexico                      |  | 100%                |  | Holds concession for Mexicali International Airport       



84



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                        |  |        |  |      |  |                                                                                                               
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Aeropuerto de Los Mochis, S.A. de C.V.                                  |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Holds concession for Los Mochis International Airport                                                         
|Aeropuerto de Manzanillo, S.A. de C.V.                                  |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Holds concession for Manzanillo International Airport                                                         
|Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Provider of administrative services to our other subsidiaries                                                 
|Corporativo de Servicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. de C.V.                   |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Provider of operational services to our other subsidiaries                                                    
|Puerta Cero Parking, S.A. de C.V.                                       |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Provider of car parking administration services to our other subsidiaries                                     
|GA del Pacífico Partipacoes do Brasil LTDA                              |  | Brazil |  | 100% |  | Holding company for other acquisitions (incorporated in 2010; not operational through the date of this filing)
|Fundación Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, A.C.                        |  | Mexico |  | 100% |  | Non-profit company incorporated in 2013 to manage charitable donations and social welfare activities          



|(1) | Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. directly holds 99.99% of the shares in each of our subsidiaries. The remaining shares of Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de
C.V. are held by Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V., while the remaining shares of our other subsidiaries are held by Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. As a result, Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. directly or indirectly holds 100% of the shares of each of our subsidiaries.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Pursuant to the Mexican National Assets Law (Ley General de Bienes Nacionales), all real
estate and fixtures in our airports are owned by the Mexican government. Each of our concessions is scheduled to terminate in 2048, although each concession may be extended one or more times for up to an aggregate of an additional 50 years. The
option to extend a concession is subject to our acceptance of any changes to such concession that may be imposed by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation and our compliance with the terms of our current concessions. Upon expiration of
our concessions, these assets automatically revert to the Mexican government, including improvements we may have made during the terms of the concessions, free and clear of any liens and/or encumbrances, and we will be required to indemnify the
Mexican government for damages to these assets, except for those caused by normal wear and tear.

Our corporate headquarters are located
in Guadalajara, Jalisco. We lease the office space for our corporate headquarters, located on the fifth and sixth floors of Torre Pacífico, from Guadalajara World Trade Center. In addition to our corporate offices in Guadalajara, we also
lease office space in Colonia Los Morales, in Mexico City from Racine, S.A. de C.V.

We maintain comprehensive insurance coverage that
covers the principal assets of our airports and other property, subject to customary limits, against damage due to natural disasters, accidents, terrorism or similar events. We also maintain general liability insurance, but do not maintain business
interruption insurance. Among other insurance policies, we carry a Ps. 500 million insurance policy covering damages to our property and a U.S.$ 150 million policy covering personal and property damages to third parties, in each case
applicable only to damages resulting from certain terrorist acts. We also carry a general Ps. 2.25 billion insurance policy covering damage to our assets and infrastructure and a U.S.$ 500 million insurance policy covering personal and
property damages to third parties.



|Item 4A. | Unresolved Staff Comments
|-------- | -------------------------

None.



85



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 5. | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
|------- | --------------------------------------------

The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with, and is entirely qualified by reference to, our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this annual report. It does not include all of the information included
in our consolidated financial statements. You should read our consolidated financial statements to gain a better understanding of our business and our historical results of operations.

Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by IASB. Our first financial statements reported under
IFRS were for the year 2012; therefore, our date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2011. A description of the effects on our financial information due to our transition from our previous generally accepted accounting principles, MFRS, to
IFRS was presented in Note 31 to our audited consolidated financial statements in our annual report on form 20-F for 2012. The financial information in our annual report on Form 20-F for 2011 differs from the information we previously published for
2011, because it is presented in accordance with IFRS.

Overview

We operate 12 airports in the Pacific and Central regions of Mexico pursuant to concessions granted by the Mexican government. The majority of
our revenues are derived from providing aeronautical services, which generally are related to the use of our airport facilities by airlines and passengers. For example, in 2011, 2012 and 2013, approximately 62.3%, 68.1% and 69.2%, respectively, of
our total revenues were derived from aeronautical services (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, aeronautical services represented 78.9%, 76.9% and 75.5%, respectively, of the sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues). Changes in our revenues from
aeronautical services are principally driven by the passenger and cargo volumes at our airports. Our revenues from aeronautical services are also affected by the maximum rates we are allowed to charge under the price regulation system established by
the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. The system of price regulation that applies to our aeronautical revenues allows us to charge up to a maximum rate for each unit of traffic volume (which is measured in workload units) at each
airport. Thus, increases in aeronautical services, such as passenger and cargo volume, and therefore the number of workload units that we handle, generate greater revenues.

We also derive revenue from non-aeronautical activities, principally related to the commercial services offered at our airports, such as the
leasing of space to restaurants, retailers and service providers. Revenues from non-aeronautical activities are not subject to the system of price regulation established by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Thus, our
non-aeronautical revenues are primarily affected by the passenger volume at our airports and the mix of commercial services offered at our airports, the contracts that we have with the providers of those commercial services and our ability to
increase the rates we charge to those service providers. While we expect that aeronautical revenues will continue to represent a majority of our future aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, growth of our revenues from commercial activities
generally has exceeded, and we expect will continue to exceed, the growth rate of our aeronautical revenues. As a result, in recent years we have completed renovation projects to improve the product mix of retail stores in the commercial areas at
our Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Guanajuato, Tijuana, Manzanillo, Morelia and La Paz international airports. Similarly, we intend to redesign and expand the space available to commercial activities in our other airports terminals.
We also expect to continue renegotiating agreements with terminal tenants to be more consistent with market practices and to recover the rights to non-aeronautical businesses at our airports previously or currently operated by third parties and
developing new sources of non-aeronautical revenues through the direct operation of certain businesses such as our VIP lounges, advertising, convenience stores and car parking lots, among others. Also see Item 4, Business Overview 
Our Sources of Revenues  Non-aeronautical Services  Recent Expansion and Development of Commercial Areas.



86



---

##### Table of Contents

Traffic at our airports has been adversely affected by increased levels of competition as a
result of the attractiveness, affordability and accessibility of competing tourist destinations in Mexico, such as Acapulco and Cancun, or elsewhere, such as Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Florida, Cuba, Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and other Caribbean
islands and destinations in Central America. In addition, we expect increased competition as a result of the government granting new concessions or amending existing permits for other airports that may compete with our airports. See Item 3,
Risk Factors  Risks Related to Our Operations  Competition from other tourist destinations could adversely affect our business and Item 3, Risk Factors  Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Business 
The Mexican government could grant new concessions that compete with our airports for more information.

Recent Developments

Fiscal Reforms

In December 2013, a tax
reform for 2014 was approved, with substantial effects for Mexican taxpayers (as published in the Official Gazette on December 11, 2013, the 2014 Fiscal Reform). With respect to the Income Tax Law, some of the more favorable tax
provisions were limited: the maximum income tax rate for individuals was increased from 30% to 35%; a new 10% withholding tax for dividends and capital gains paid to non-Mexican and to individual holders was imposed, which includes any gain on the
sale of shares or ADSs by any holder, even if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other approved securities markets; and companies deductible expenses regarding exempt payments to their employees were limited
to 47%. It is unclear how withholding tax on capital gains will apply to shares or ADSs held by non-Mexicans. A Value-Added Tax (VAT) rate of 16% was applied uniformly to all of Mexico, a change from the 11% that was previously applicable in some
areas of Mexico. In addition, other taxes were imposed on so-called junk food at the rate of 8%, while the reform also repealed the IETU and the Tax on Cash Deposits Law.

The principal change to affect our business was the effect on our deferred income taxes caused by the reform to the Income Tax Law, by which
the income tax rate was increased for the future from 28% to 30% and the IETU was eliminated. As a result of the net impact of these effects, we recognized a benefit of Ps. 199.0 million in deferred income tax for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013.

Fluctuation of the Peso

International passengers and international flights pay tariffs denominated in U.S. dollars. However, these tariffs are generally invoiced and
collected in Mexican pesos. Because such tariffs are invoiced taking into account the average of the exchange rate for the 30 days prior to the date of a flight, a significant depreciation of the peso during the final two months of any year could
result in our exceeding our maximum rates, which would be a violation of our concession. If a significant depreciation in the peso occurred, we could be required to issue rebates to airline customers to avoid exceeding our maximum rates. On the
other hand, a significant appreciation in the peso could result in us invoicing substantially less than our maximum rate per workload unit. We do not have any means of recovering lost revenue if we charge less than the maximum rate as a result of a
significant appreciation in the peso. We attempt to set our dollar-denominated tariffs so as to avoid exceeding our maximum rates while attempting to charge as close to the maximum rate as possible. Since the beginning of our concessions,
fluctuations in the peso have not caused us to exceed our maximum rates or required us to issue rebates to avoid exceeding our maximum rates.

As long as we are able to ensure that our revenues do not exceed our maximum rates as discussed above, the depreciation in the peso has a
positive effect on our revenues from a commercial and aeronautical operations perspective while appreciation in the peso has a negative effect. Tariffs on international passengers and international flights and some of our contracts with commercial
services providers are denominated in U.S. dollars, but only in the case of charges for international passengers and



87



---

##### Table of Contents

international flights are charges invoiced and collected in Mexican pesos. Therefore, depreciation in the peso against the dollar results in us collecting more pesos than before the depreciation,
whereas appreciation of the peso results in us collecting fewer pesos, which may result in lower commercial revenues in the future, especially if the appreciation continues unabated or surpasses historic levels of appreciation. In addition, although
most of our operating costs are denominated in pesos, we cannot predict whether our cost of services will increase as a result of the depreciation of the peso or as a result of other factors.

From December 31, 2010 to December 30, 2011 the peso depreciated from Ps. 12.38 pesos to Ps. 13.95 pesos per U.S. dollar. In 2012,
the peso appreciated, to Ps. 12.96 per U.S. dollar from Ps. 13.95 pesos per U.S. dollar. In 2013, the peso depreciated reaching Ps. 13.10 per U.S. dollar on December 31, 2013. On April 11, 2014, the exchange rate for pesos was
Ps. 13.07 per U.S. dollar.

Passenger and Cargo Volumes

The majority of the passenger traffic volume in our airports is made up of domestic passengers. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, approximately 64.6%,
65.6% and 66.3% of the terminal passengers using our airports were domestic. The total number of domestic terminal passengers for 2013 increased 10.0% as compared to 2012, and the total number of domestic terminal passengers in 2012 increased 7.0%
as compared to 2011. In addition, of the international passengers traveling through our airports, approximately 30.3% traveled on flights originating in or departing to the United States during 2013, as compared to 30.3% in 2012 and 35.4% in 2011.
Accordingly, our results of operations are influenced strongly by changes to Mexican economic conditions and to a lesser extent influenced by U.S. economic and other conditions, particularly trends and events affecting leisure travel and consumer
spending. Many factors affecting our passenger traffic volume and the mix of passenger traffic in our airports are beyond our control.

The following table sets forth certain operating and financial data relating to certain of our revenues and passenger and cargo volumes for
the years indicated.



|                                                               |  |                         |          |    |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |   
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | -------- | -- | ---- | --- | -------- | ---- |  | --- | -------- | --
|                                                               |  | Year ended December 31, |         
|                                                               |  | 2011                    |          |    | 2012 |     |          | 2013 | 
|Change in Mexican gross domestic product(1)                    |  |                         | 3.9      | %  |      |     | 3.9      | %    |  |     | 1.1      | % 
|Change in Mexican Consumer Price Index(2)                      |  |                         | 3.8      | %  |      |     | 3.6      | %    |  |     | 4.0      | % 
|Domestic terminal passengers(6)                                |  |                         | 13,055.4 |    |      |     | 13,974.7 |      |  |     | 15,370.3 |   
|International terminal passengers(6)                           |  |                         | 7,152.2  |    |      |     | 7,312.5  |      |  |     | 7,803.1  |   
|Total terminal passengers(6)                                   |  |                         | 20,207.6 |    |      |     | 21,287.3 |      |  |     | 23,173.4 |   
|Cargo units(3)                                                 |  |                         | 1,568.2  |    |      |     | 1,618.0  |      |  |     | 1,669.2  |   
|Total workload units(3)                                        |  |                         | 21,775.8 |    |      |     | 22,905.2 |      |  |     | 24,842.6 |   
|Change in total terminal passengers(4)                         |  |                         | (0.1     | )% |      |     | 3.2      | %    |  |     | 8.9      | % 
|Change in workload units(4)                                    |  |                         | (0.2     | )% |      |     | 5.2      | %    |  |     | 8.5      | % 
|Aeronautical revenues(5)                                       |  | Ps.                     | 3,077.9  |    |      | Ps. | 3,366.0  |      |  | Ps. | 3,616.6  |   
|Change in aeronautical revenues(4)                             |  |                         | n/a      |    |      |     | 9.4      | %    |  |     | 7.4      | % 
|Aeronautical revenues per workload unit                        |  | Ps.                     | 141.3    |    |      | Ps. | 147.0    |      |  | Ps. | 145.6    |   
|Change in aeronautical revenues per workload unit(4)           |  |                         | n/a      |    |      |     | 4.0      | %    |  |     | (0.9     | %)
|Non-aeronautical revenues(5)                                   |  | Ps.                     | 824.6    |    |      | Ps. | 1,008.5  |      |  | Ps. | 1,170.5  |   
|Change in non-aeronautical revenues(4)                         |  |                         | n/a      |    |      |     | 22.3     | %    |  |     | 16.1     | % 
|Non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger               |  | Ps.                     | 40.8     |    |      | Ps. | 47.4     |      |  | Ps. | 50.5     |   
|Change in non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger (4) |  |                         | n/a      |    |      |     | 16.1     | %    |  |     | 6.6      | % 



|(1) | In real terms, as reported by the Mexican National Institute for Statistics and Geography (INEGI).
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | As reported by INEGI.
|--- | ---------------------

|(3) | Thousands. One cargo unit is equivalent to 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo. Under the regulation applicable to our aeronautical revenues, one workload unit is equivalent to one terminal passenger or one cargo unit.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | In each case, as compared to the previous period. Due to our adoption of IFRS, we have not calculated a percent change from 2010 to 2011 for the relevant revenue item.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | In millions of pesos.
|--- | ---------------------

|(6) | In thousands.
|--- | -------------



88



---

##### Table of Contents

In 2013, we had 23.2 million terminal passengers (15.4 million domestic and 7.8 million
international), of which 135.2 thousand were on general aviation flights, and an additional 178.9 thousand were transit passengers. Approximately 30.7% of our transit passengers were handled at the Tijuana International Airport.

Classification of Revenues

We classify
our revenues into three categories; (i) revenues from aeronautical services, (ii) revenues from non-aeronautical services and (iii) revenues from improvements to concession assets. Historically, a majority of our revenues have been
derived from aeronautical services; however, with the inclusion of revenues from improvements to concession assets, revenues from aeronautical services and from non-aeronautical services will account for a smaller percentage of total revenues. For
example, in 2011, 2012 and 2013, with the inclusion of revenues from improvements to concession assets, aeronautical revenues represented 62.3%, 68.1% and 69.2%, respectively, of total revenues. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, with the inclusion of revenues
from improvements to concession assets, non-aeronautical revenues represented 16.7%, 20.4% and 22.4%, respectively, of total revenues. Aeronautical revenues and non-aeronautical revenues, however, represented 78.9% and 21.1%, respectively, of the
sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues in 2011, 76.9% and 23.1%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues in 2012 and 75.5% and 24.5%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues in
2013. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, revenues from improvements to concession assets accounted for 21.0%, 11.5% and 8.4%, respectively, of our total revenues.

Our revenues from aeronautical services are subject to price regulation under the applicable maximum rate at each of our airports, and
principally consist of passenger charges, aircraft landing and parking charges, airport security charges, passenger walkway charges, leasing of space in our airports to airlines (other than first class/VIP lounges and other similar non-essential
activities) and complementary services (i.e., fees from handling and catering providers, permanent ground transportation operators and access fees from fuel providers at our airports).

Our revenues from non-aeronautical services are not subject to price regulation under our maximum rates and generally include revenues earned
from car parking, leasing of space in our airports to airlines and complementary service providers (for first class/VIP lounges and similar non-essential activities), rental and royalty payments from third parties operating stores, providing
commercial services at our airports (such as car rental agencies, food and beverage providers and retail and duty-free store operators), as well as advertising and fees collected from other miscellaneous sources, such as vending machines and
time-share developers. Additionally, we derive revenues from recovery of costs which are included in our non-aeronautical services.

Our
revenues from improvements to concession assets represent the fair value of the additions and upgrades to the concession that we undertake in accordance with our Master Development Programs. In exchange for making those additions and upgrades, the
Government grants us the right to obtain benefits for services provided using those assets, which are recognized as intangible assets. This represents an exchange of dissimilar goods or services rather than an actual cash exchange since we receive
an intangible asset for the construction services we provide. Through a bidding process, we hire third parties to make the additions and upgrades. The amount of revenues for these services is equal to the costs of making the additions and upgrades
since those values represent the fair value of the goods or services received as there is no profit margin stemming from these construction services. Although these revenues do not generate actual cash inflows, IFRS requires that they be recorded
given that revenue generation is inherent in an exchange of dissimilar services, similar to a barter transaction. These revenues do not have a cash impact on our results.



89



---

##### Table of Contents

For a detailed description of the components of our revenue categories, see
Item 4,Information on the Company  Business Overview  Our Sources of Revenues.

Aeronautical Revenues

The system of price regulation applicable to our aeronautical revenues establishes a maximum rate in pesos for each airport for
each year in a five-year period, which is the maximum annual amount of revenues per workload unit that we may earn at that airport from aeronautical services. As of December 31, 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation had
determined the maximum rates for our airports for each year through December 31, 2014. Our aeronautical revenues are determined largely by the number of workload units at each of our airports, which is primarily driven by passenger traffic
levels, multiplied by the value of the maximum tariffs approved by the Ministry of Communication and Transportation. In addition, aeronautical revenues differ among our airports to the extent passenger traffic levels differ among these airports. See
Item 4, Regulatory Framework  Aeronautical Services Regulation for a description of our maximum rates and the rate-setting procedures for future periods.

Our concessions provide that our maximum rates must be adjusted on an annual basis as determined by the efficiency factor and by changes in
inflation. See Item 4, Regulatory Framework  Aeronautical Revenues Regulation  Methodology for Determining Future Maximum Rates.

Under the regulatory system applicable to our aeronautical revenues, we can set the specific price for each category of aeronautical services
every six months (or more frequently if accumulated inflation since the last adjustment exceeds 5%), as long as the total aeronautical revenues per workload unit each year at each of our airports do not exceed the maximum rate set for such airport
for that year. We currently set the specific price for each category of aeronautical services after negotiations with our principal airline customers.

Aeronautical revenue per workload unit is an indicator that is calculated by dividing total aeronautical revenues by the workload units for a
given period. This indicator is affected annually, except for years in which the new maximum tariffs are set, by:



| |  |  | Adjustment in the maximum rates for the efficiency factor and the Mexican Producer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Precios al Productor, excluding petroleum);
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increases and decreases in the relative number of workload units at each airport; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changes in total workload units per airport.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------

Beginning in 2010, the efficiency factor was
0.70% and will remain at this level until December 31, 2014. Our weighted average maximum tariffs, as determined by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation (prior to inflation adjustments using the Mexican Producer Price Index),
decreased 0.86% in 2011, decreased 0.72% in 2012 and decreased 0.76% in 2013, mainly as a result of variation in the percentage that each airports workload units represent of our total workload units. At the same time, the Mexican Producer
Price Index, excluding petroleum increased by 7.2%, 0.9% and 0.1% in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. During 2011 and 2012 our weighted average maximum tariffs as adjusted by the efficiency factor and the Mexican Producer Price Index, excluding
petroleum increased 6.3% and 0.2% respectively, and decreased 0.6% during 2013. The total workload units at our airports were 21.8 million, 22.9 million and 24.8 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, a decrease of 0.2% in
2011, an



90



---

##### Table of Contents

increase of 5.2% in 2012 and an increase of 8.5% in 2013. Accordingly, when calculating aeronautical revenue per workload units, the result will fluctuate depending on the relative changes in the
aforementioned factors. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, average aeronautical revenues per workload unit were Ps. 141.3, Ps. 147.0 and Ps. 145.6, respectively, which represented an increase of 4.3%, 4.0% and a decrease of 0.9% in 2011, 2012 and 2013,
respectively. The increase in 2012 resulted mainly from increases in tariffs due to adjustments for inflation and the distribution in increase in workload units among our airports. Meanwhile, the decrease in 2013 resulted mainly from the effect of a
flat inflation on the tariffs along with the 0.7% efficiency factor that is applied each year to all tariffs at each of our airports.

Historically, we have set our prices for regulated services at our airports as close as possible to the maximum rates allowed in any
given year, and we expect to pursue this pricing strategy in the future. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect virtually all of the revenues we are entitled to earn from services subject to price regulation in the future
or that we will not be sanctioned in case we exceed our maximum rates. For a discussion of risks relating to our ability to set specific prices, see Item 3, Risk Factors  Risks Related to the Regulation of Our Business  We
provide a public service regulated by the Mexican government and our flexibility in managing our aeronautical activities is limited by the regulatory environment in which we operate and Item 3, Risk Factors  Risks
Related to the Regulation of Our Business  If we exceed the maximum rate at any airport at the end of any year, we could be subject to sanctions.



91



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our revenues from aeronautical services for the years indicated.

Aeronautical Revenues



|                                                           |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |   
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- |  | ------- |  | ----- | ------ |  | --- | ------- |  |  | ------ | ----- | - | ------- | --- | ------- |  |  |  | ----- | --
|                                                           |  | Year ended December 31,                                        |        
|                                                           |  | 2011                                                           |         |  | 2012    |  |       | 2013   | 
|                                                           |  | Amount                                                         |         |  | Percent |  |       | Amount |  |     | Percent |  |  | Amount |       |   | Percent |    
|                                                           |  | (millions of pesos, except percentages and workload unit data) |        
|Aeronautical Revenues:                                     |  |                                                                |         | 
|Passenger charges                                          |  | Ps.                                                            | 2,556.4 |  |         |  | 83.1  | %      |  | Ps. | 2,822.8 |  |  |        | 83.9  | % |         | Ps. | 3,074.0 |  |  |  | 85.0  | % 
|Aircraft landing charges                                   |  |                                                                | 157.7   |  |         |  | 5.1   |        |  |     | 170.7   |  |  |        | 5.1   |   |         |     | 177.0   |  |  |  | 4.9   |   
|Aircraft parking charges                                   |  |                                                                | 144.3   |  |         |  | 4.7   |        |  |     | 154.1   |  |  |        | 4.6   |   |         |     | 160.3   |  |  |  | 4.4   |   
|Airport security charges                                   |  |                                                                | 40.9    |  |         |  | 1.3   |        |  |     | 44.6    |  |  |        | 1.3   |   |         |     | 49.7    |  |  |  | 1.4   |   
|Passenger walkway charges                                  |  |                                                                | 24.3    |  |         |  | 0.8   |        |  |     | 22.6    |  |  |        | 0.7   |   |         |     | 0.0     |  |  |  | 0.0   |   
|Leasing of space to airlines                               |  |                                                                | 101.0   |  |         |  | 3.3   |        |  |     | 97.2    |  |  |        | 2.9   |   |         |     | 96.6    |  |  |  | 2.7   |   
|Revenues from complementary service providers(1)           |  |                                                                | 53.4    |  |         |  | 1.7   |        |  |     | 54.0    |  |  |        | 1.6   |   |         |     | 59.1    |  |  |  | 1.6   |   
|                                                           |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |   
|Total Aeronautical Revenues                                |  | Ps.                                                            | 3,077.9 |  |         |  | 100.0 | %      |  | Ps. | 3,366.0 |  |  |        | 100.0 | % |         | Ps. | 3,616.6 |  |  |  | 100.0 | % 
|                                                           |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |   
|Other Information:                                         |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |  
|Total workload units(2)                                    |  |                                                                | 21.8    |  |         |  | `     |        |  |     | 22.9    |  |  |        |       |   |         |     | 24.8    |  |  |  |       |   
|Total aeronautical revenues per workload unit              |  | Ps.                                                            | 141.3   |  |         |  |       |        |  | Ps. | 147.0   |  |  |        |       |   |         | Ps. | 145.6   |  |  |  |       |   
|Change in aeronautical revenues(3)                         |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |      |        |  |     |         |  |  |        | 9.4   | % |         |     |         |  |  |  | 7.4   | % 
|Change in total aeronautical revenues per workload unit(3) |  |                                                                |         |  |         |  |      |        |  |     |         |  |  |        | 4.0   | % |         |     |         |  |  |  | (0.9  | %)



|(1) | Revenues from complementary service providers consist of access and other fees charged to third parties providing baggage handling, catering and other services at our airports.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | In millions. Under the regulation applicable to our aeronautical revenues, a workload unit is equivalent to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | In each case, as compared to the previous year. Due to our adoption of IFRS, we have not calculated a percent change from 2010 to 2011.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Under the relevant agreements with airlines, our specific prices are structured such that the substantial majority of our aeronautical
revenues are derived from passenger charges, and we expect that this will continue to be the case in any future agreements. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, passenger charges represented 83.1%, 83.9% and 85.0%, respectively, of our aeronautical services
revenues and 51.8%, 57.1% and 58.8%, respectively, of our total revenues (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, passenger charges represented 65.5%, 64.5% and 64.2%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues).

In prior years, in order to ensure our compliance with the maximum rate at a particular airport when the possibility of exceeding that maximum
rate arose, we have taken actions in the latter part of the year, such as reducing our specific prices for aeronautical services and offering discounts or rebates, to ensure our compliance with the applicable maximum rate. In the future, we intend
to continue to adjust our rates in the latter part of each year to ensure compliance with our maximum rates.

The following table sets
forth the number of passengers paying passenger charges for the years indicated. We earn passenger charges from each departing passenger at our airports, other than transit and transfer passengers (if the transfer of the passenger occurs within 24
hours of the passengers arrival at the airport), diplomats and infants.

Passengers Paying Passenger Charges



|                |  |                                    |         |  |          |  |       |        |  |  |          |  |  |        |       |   |         |  |          |  |  |  |      |  
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------------- | ------- |  | -------- |  | ----- | ------ |  |  | -------- |  |  | ------ | ----- | - | ------- |  | -------- |  |  |  | ---- | -
|                |  | Year ended December 31,            |        
|Airport         |  | 2011                               |         |  | 2012     |  |       | 2013   | 
|                |  | Amount                             |         |  | % change |  |       | Amount |  |  | % change |  |  | Amount |       |   | %change | 
|                |  | (in thousands, except percentages) |        
|Guadalajara     |  |                                    | 3,384.7 |  |          |  | 5.0   | %      |  |  | 3,488.5  |  |  |        | 3.1   | % |         |  | 3,828.8  |  |  |  | 9.8  | %
|Tijuana         |  |                                    | 1,664.5 |  |          |  | (3.6  | )      |  |  | 1,777.3  |  |  |        | 6.8   |   |         |  | 1,989.7  |  |  |  | 11.9 |  
|Los Cabos       |  |                                    | 1,386.2 |  |          |  | 2.6   |        |  |  | 1,486.0  |  |  |        | 7.2   |   |         |  | 1,674.3  |  |  |  | 12.7 |  
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                                    | 1,237.0 |  |          |  | (6.9  | )      |  |  | 1,268.7  |  |  |        | 2.6   |   |         |  | 1,304.2  |  |  |  | 2.8  |  
|Hermosillo      |  |                                    | 476.0   |  |          |  | 4.6   |        |  |  | 533.3    |  |  |        | 12.0  |   |         |  | 563.7    |  |  |  | 5.7  |  
|Guanajuato      |  |                                    | 408.3   |  |          |  | 0.1   |        |  |  | 453.9    |  |  |        | 11.2  |   |         |  | 480.0    |  |  |  | 5.7  |  
|La Paz          |  |                                    | 265.8   |  |          |  | (1.0  | )      |  |  | 269.0    |  |  |        | 1.2   |   |         |  | 292.1    |  |  |  | 8.6  |  
|Mexicali        |  |                                    | 227.6   |  |          |  | 7.5   |        |  |  | 242.8    |  |  |        | 6.7   |   |         |  | 231.9    |  |  |  | -4.5 |  
|Aguascalientes  |  |                                    | 158.3   |  |          |  | 11.6  |        |  |  | 193.7    |  |  |        | 22.3  |   |         |  | 221.5    |  |  |  | 14.4 |  
|Morelia         |  |                                    | 177.5   |  |          |  | (14.5 | )      |  |  | 194.1    |  |  |        | 9.4   |   |         |  | 205.6    |  |  |  | 5.9  |  
|Los Mochis      |  |                                    | 99.0    |  |          |  | (14.2 | )      |  |  | 86.6     |  |  |        | (12.5 | ) |         |  | 95.1     |  |  |  | 9.8  |  
|Manzanillo      |  |                                    | 74.7    |  |          |  | (2.1  | )      |  |  | 79.1     |  |  |        | 5.9   |   |         |  | 91.5     |  |  |  | 15.8 |  
|                |  |                                    |         |  |          |  |       |        |  |  |          |  |  |        |       |   |         |  |          |  |  |  |      |  
|Total           |  |                                    | 9,559.6 |  |          |  | 0.5   | %      |  |  | 10,073.0 |  |  |        | 5.4   | % |         |  | 10,978.5 |  |  |  | 9.0  | %
|                |  |                                    |         |  |          |  |       |        |  |  |          |  |  |        |       |   |         |  |          |  |  |  |      |  



92



---

##### Table of Contents

Non-aeronautical Revenues

Non-aeronautical services historically have generated a smaller portion of our total revenues as compared to aeronautical services.
Non-aeronautical revenues represented 16.7%, 20.4% and 22.4% of total revenues in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, non-aeronautical revenues represented 21.1%, 23.1% and 24.5%, respectively, of the sum of aeronautical and
non-aeronautical revenues). Non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger were Ps. 40.8, Ps. 47.4 and Ps. 50.5 in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. None of our revenues from non-aeronautical services are subject to price regulation under our
maximum-rate price regulation system.

Our revenues from non-aeronautical services are principally derived from commercial activities. We
divide non-aeronautical commercial activities into revenues from businesses operated by third parties and revenues from businesses operated directly. Businesses operated by third parties include leasing of space in our airports to airlines and
complementary service providers (for first class/VIP lounges and similar non-essential activities) and rental and royalty payments from third parties operating stores and providing commercial services at our airports, such as time-share developers,
retail stores, food and beverage providers, car rental agencies and duty-free store operators, as well as fees collected from other miscellaneous sources, such as vending machines. Businesses operated directly by us include car parking, advertising,
VIP lounges and convenience stores. Additionally, we derive revenues from recovery of costs which are included in our non-aeronautical revenues.



93



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our revenues from non-aeronautical services for the years
indicated.

Non-aeronautical Revenues



|                                                              |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- |  | ------- |  | ----- | ------ |  | --- | ------- |  |  | ------ | ----- | - | ------- | --- | ------- |  |  |  | ----- | -
|                                                              |  | Year ended December 31,                                        |      
|                                                              |  | 2011                                                           |       |  | 2012    |  |       | 2013   | 
|                                                              |  | Amount                                                         |       |  | Percent |  |       | Amount |  |     | Percent |  |  | Amount |       |   | Percent |    
|                                                              |  | (millions of pesos, except percentages and workload unit data) |      
|Non-aeronautical Services:                                    |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         | 
|Businesses operated by third parties:                         |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         | 
|Leasing of space(1)                                           |  | Ps.                                                            | 115.7 |  |         |  | 14.0  | %      |  | Ps. | 126.5   |  |  |        | 12.5  | % |         | Ps. | 151.2   |  |  |  | 12.9  | %
|Car rentals                                                   |  |                                                                | 81.7  |  |         |  | 9.9   | %      |  |     | 92.3    |  |  |        | 9.2   | % |         |     | 101.1   |  |  |  | 8.6   | %
|Food and beverage operations                                  |  |                                                                | 74.3  |  |         |  | 9.0   | %      |  |     | 86.0    |  |  |        | 8.5   | % |         |     | 103.1   |  |  |  | 8.8   | %
|Retail operations                                             |  |                                                                | 78.8  |  |         |  | 9.6   | %      |  |     | 80.3    |  |  |        | 8.0   | % |         |     | 93.5    |  |  |  | 8.0   | %
|Duty-free operations                                          |  |                                                                | 71.2  |  |         |  | 8.6   | %      |  |     | 86.4    |  |  |        | 8.6   | % |         |     | 115.6   |  |  |  | 9.9   | %
|Time share operators                                          |  |                                                                | 82.4  |  |         |  | 10.0  | %      |  |     | 98.3    |  |  |        | 9.8   | % |         |     | 108.0   |  |  |  | 9.2   | %
|Advertising                                                   |  |                                                                | 15.6  |  |         |  | 1.9   | %      |  |     |        |  |  |        | 0.0   | % |         |     |        |  |  |  | 0.0   | %
|Communications and financial services                         |  |                                                                | 20.7  |  |         |  | 2.5   | %      |  |     | 20.7    |  |  |        | 2.1   | % |         |     | 29.5    |  |  |  | 2.5   | %
|Other                                                         |  |                                                                | 35.3  |  |         |  | 4.3   | %      |  |     | 63.9    |  |  |        | 6.3   | % |         |     | 25.5    |  |  |  | 2.2   | %
|                                                              |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |  
|Total businesses operated by third parties:                   |  |                                                                | 575.7 |  |         |  | 69.8  | %      |  |     | 654.3   |  |  |        | 64.9  | % |         |     | 727.5   |  |  |  | 62.1  | %
|Businesses operated directly by us:                           |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         | 
|Car parking charges                                           |  |                                                                | 169.8 |  |         |  | 20.6  | %      |  |     | 193.7   |  |  |        | 19.2  | % |         |     | 221.0   |  |  |  | 18.9  | %
|Advertising                                                   |  |                                                                | 38.5  |  |         |  | 4.7   | %      |  |     | 76.2    |  |  |        | 7.6   | % |         |     | 87.3    |  |  |  | 7.5   | %
|VIP lounges                                                   |  |                                                                |      |  |         |  | 0.0   | %      |  |     | 10.5    |  |  |        | 2.0   | % |         |     | 24.2    |  |  |  | 2.1   | %
|Convenience stores                                            |  |                                                                |      |  |         |  | 0.0   | %      |  |     | 1.5     |  |  |        | 2.9   | % |         |     | 16.1    |  |  |  | 1.4   | %
|                                                              |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |  
|Total businesses operated directly by us:                     |  |                                                                | 208.2 |  |         |  | 25.3  | %      |  |     | 281.9   |  |  |        | 28.0  | % |         |     | 348.7   |  |  |  | 29.8  | %
|Recovery of costs(2)                                          |  |                                                                | 40.6  |  |         |  | 4.9   | %      |  |     | 72.2    |  |  |        | 7.2   | % |         |     | 94.4    |  |  |  | 8.1   | %
|                                                              |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |  
|Total Non-aeronautical Revenues                               |  | Ps.                                                            | 824.6 |  |         |  | 100.0 | %      |  | Ps. | 1,008.5 |  |  |        | 100.0 | % |         | Ps. | 1,170.5 |  |  |  | 100.0 | %
|                                                              |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         |  |  |        |       |   |         |     |         |  |  |  |       |  
|Other Information:                                            |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  |       |        |  |     |         | 
|Total terminal passengers(3)                                  |  |                                                                | 20.2  |  |         |  |       |        |  |     | 21.3    |  |  |        |       |   |         |     | 23.2    |  |  |  |       |  
|Non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger              |  | Ps.                                                            | 40.8  |  |         |  |       |        |  | Ps. | 47.4    |  |  |        |       |   |         | Ps. | 50.5    |  |  |  |       |  
|Change in non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger(4) |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  | n/a   |        |  |     |         |  |  |        | 16.1  | % |         |     |         |  |  |  | 6.6   | %
|Car parking charges per terminal passenger                    |  | Ps.                                                            | 8.4   |  |         |  |       |        |  | Ps. | 9.1     |  |  |        |       |   |         | Ps. | 9.5     |  |  |  |       |  
|Change in car parking charges per terminal passenger(4)       |  |                                                                |       |  |         |  | n/a   |        |  |     |         |  |  |        | 8.3   | % |         |     |         |  |  |  | 4.4   | %



|(1) | Includes leasing of space in our airports to airlines and complementary service providers (for first class/VIP lounges and other similar non-essential activities).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Recovery of costs consists of utility, fuel, maintenance and operation charges that are transferred to airlines and other tenants in our airports.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | In millions of passengers.
|--- | --------------------------

|(4) | In each case, as compared to the previous year. Due to our adoption of IFRS, we have not calculated a percent change from 2010 to 2011.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In 2013, revenues from non-aeronautical services in our airports accounted for 22.4% of the total revenues generated by our airports (in 2013,
non-aeronautical revenues represented 24.5% of the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues). In contrast, we believe that revenues from commercial activities may account for up to 40% or more of the consolidated revenues of many leading
privatized airports. While we believe that aeronautical revenues will continue to represent a majority of our future revenues, we currently estimate that the growth rate of our revenues from commercial activities will likely exceed the growth rate
of our aeronautical revenues (as was the case during the period from 2011 to 2013), except in the years in which the maximum tariffs are reset.

In recent years, non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger have increased 6.6% (from Ps. 47.4 in 2012 to Ps. 50.7 in 2013, while
terminal passengers decreased 0.9%), while our cost of services per workload unit has decreased 1.9% (from Ps. 46.3 in 2012 to Ps. 45.4 in 2013), resulting in non-aeronautical services contributing more to our results of operations.



94



---

##### Table of Contents

Non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger show the average revenue generated by the
commercial areas of our airports, and it is calculated by dividing total non-aeronautical revenues by the number of terminal passengers during the same period. Therefore if non-aeronautical revenues decline proportionately less than the decline in
the number of terminal passengers during a period, non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger will increase despite the decrease in non-aeronautical revenues. Non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger are principally affected by:



| |  |  | Recovery of rights to certain businesses that we previously did not operate;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Opening of new commercial space at our airports;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The level of passenger traffic; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | The exchange rate between the Mexican peso and the US dollar. This exchange rate affects our contracts that are denominated in U.S. dollars, which mainly consist of lease contracts for time-share developers, car
rentals, duty-free services and certain lease contracts for food and beverages and retail operations.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certain categories of
non-aeronautical revenues are directly impacted by passenger traffic (for example car parking and rental, and food and beverage providers) while others are not (for example leasing of space, on which we earn at least a minimum fixed rent indexed to
inflation each year, which may be increased by royalty-based payments as discussed below). Accordingly, non-aeronautical revenues do not always behave in the same manner as passenger traffic or workload units.

We estimate that approximately 97% of our current commercial agreements with third-party tenants (representing approximately 60% of our total
non-aeronautical revenues) are arranged as royalty-based contracts based on the nature of our tenants operations. Under a royalty-based contract the amount tenants must pay is based on tenants revenues, subject to minimum guaranteed
fixed amounts related to the square footage of the space leased. When the royalty-based amount is lower than the minimum guaranteed amount, the tenant must still pay the latter. Therefore, a decrease in passenger traffic volumes would result in a
reduction in non-aeronautical revenues from such tenants only if, prior to such decrease in passenger traffic, the sales of royalty-based tenants were higher than the minimum guaranteed amount. As a result, during periods in which airports
experience a reduction in passenger traffic volumes, non-aeronautical revenues may remain stable due to the minimum guaranteed amount received by the airport under the lease contract, thereby resulting in a potential increase in non-aeronautical
revenues per workload unit. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, non-aeronautical revenues were Ps. 824.6 million, Ps. 1,008.5 million and Ps. 1,170.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of 22.3% in 2012 and 16.1% in 2013. In 2013,
non-aeronautical revenues increased more than terminal passengers, which increased 8.9%. In 2013, non-aeronautical revenues per terminal passenger increased from Ps. 40.8 per passenger in 2011 and Ps. 47.4 per passenger in 2012 to Ps.
50.5 per passenger in 2013, representing an increase of 16.1% from 2011 to 2012 and increase of 6.6% from 2012 to 2013. The increase from 2011 to 2012 was mainly due to the fact that total terminal passenger volume increased approximately 5% in
2012 as compared to 2011 while non-aeronautical revenues increased 22.3% as compared to 2011. From 2012 to 2013, the increase was mainly due to the fact that total terminal passenger volume increased to 23.2 million in 2013 from
21.3 million in 2012.

Recognition of revenues from improvements to concession assets

International Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee 12 (IFRIC 12) Service Concession Arrangements
requires, subject to certain conditions, that the infrastructure of a service concession contract falling within its scope not be recognized as property, plant and equipment. It also requires that revenues obtained when the operator performs both
construction or upgrade services and operating services under a single contract be recognized according to each type of service provided, based on the fair value of consideration received at the time the service is rendered. We recognize revenues
and the



95



---

##### Table of Contents

associated costs of improvements to concession assets in relation with the concessions obligation to perform improvements as established in the Master Development Programs. Revenues
represent the value of the exchange between ourselves and the government with respect to the improvements, given that we construct or provide improvements to the airports as obligated under the Master Development Programs, and in exchange, the
government grants us the right to obtain benefits for services provided using those assets, which are recognized as intangible assets. We have determined that our obligations per the Master Development Programs should be considered to be a
revenue-earning activity as all expenditures incurred to fulfill the Master Development Programs are included in the maximum tariffs. Therefore we recognize the revenue and expense in profit or loss when the expenditures are performed. The cost for
such additions and improvements to concession assets is based on actual costs incurred by us in the execution of the additions or improvements, considering the investment requirements in the Master Development Programs. Through bidding processes, we
contract third parties to carry out such construction. The amount of revenues for these services is equal to the amount of costs incurred, as we do not obtain any profit margin for these construction services. The amounts paid are set at market
value. As a result, revenues from improvements to concession assets do not have a cash impact on our results. Furthermore, they are not directly related to our passenger traffic, which is the main driver of our revenues. In 2011, we recognized Ps.
1.0 billion in revenues from improvements to concession assets. In 2012, we recognized Ps. 570.2 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets. This represented a decrease of 45.0% as compared to 2011 due to lower investment
commitments under our Master Development Programs for 2012. In 2013, we recognized Ps. 440.7 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets. This represented a decrease of 22.7% as compared to 2012 due to lower investment
commitments under our Master Development Programs for 2013.

Operating Costs

The following table sets forth our operating costs and certain other related information for the years indicated.

Operating Costs



|                                                                             |  |                                                            |          |   |        |     |          |        |  |     |          |   |  |  |        |   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | - | ------ | --- | -------- | ------ |  | --- | -------- | - |  |  | ------ | --
|                                                                             |  | Year ended December 31,                                    |         
|                                                                             |  | 2011                                                       |          |   | 2012   |     |          | 2013   | 
|                                                                             |  | Amount                                                     |          |   | Amount |     |          | Amount |  |     | % change |  
|                                                                             |  | (millions of pesos, except percentages and passenger data) |         
|Operating Costs:                                                             |  |                                                            |          |   |        |     |          |        |  |     |          |   |  |  |        |   
|Cost of services:                                                            |  |                                                            |          |   |        |     |          |        |  |     |          |   |  |  |        |   
|Employee costs                                                               |  | Ps.                                                        | 369.4    |   |        | Ps. | 402.6    |        |  | Ps. | 390.6    |   |  |  | (3.0   | %)
|Maintenance                                                                  |  |                                                            | 179.5    |   |        |     | 200.0    |        |  |     | 200.2    |   |  |  | 0.1    | % 
|Safety, security and insurance                                               |  |                                                            | 131.2    |   |        |     | 159.4    |        |  |     | 173.7    |   |  |  | 9.0    | % 
|Utilities                                                                    |  |                                                            | 122.1    |   |        |     | 139.5    |        |  |     | 141.9    |   |  |  | 1.7    | % 
|Other                                                                        |  |                                                            | 184.8    |   |        |     | 158.5    |        |  |     | 222.6    |   |  |  | 40.4   | % 
|Total cost of services                                                       |  |                                                            | 986.9    |   |        |     | 1,060.0  |        |  |     | 1,129.0  |   |  |  | 6.5    | % 
|Technical assistance fees                                                    |  |                                                            | 136.2    |   |        |     | 155.1    |        |  |     | 171.5    |   |  |  | 10.6   | % 
|Concession taxes                                                             |  |                                                            | 193.8    |   |        |     | 217.3    |        |  |     | 237.7    |   |  |  | 9.4    | % 
|Depreciation and amortization:                                               |  |                                                            |          |   |        |     |          |        |  |     |          |   |  |  |        |   
|Depreciation(1)                                                              |  |                                                            | 110.3    |   |        |     | 151.2    |        |  |     | 164.6    |   |  |  | 8.9    | % 
|Amortization(2)                                                              |  |                                                            | 632.7    |   |        |     | 676.0    |        |  |     | 718.6    |   |  |  | 6.3    | % 
|Total depreciation and amortization                                          |  |                                                            | 743.0    |   |        |     | 827.2    |        |  |     | 883.2    |   |  |  | 6.8    | % 
|Other expense (income)                                                       |  |                                                            | 6.6      |   |        |     | 1.3      |        |  |     | (7.4     | ) |  |  | (659.1 | %)
|                                                                             |  |                                                            | 2,066.5  |   |        |     | 2,260.9  |        |  |     | 2,414.0  |   |  |  | 6.8    | % 
|Cost of improvements to concession assets                                    |  |                                                            | 1,036.2  |   |        |     | 570.2    |        |  |     | 440.7    |   |  |  | (22.7  | %)
|Total operating costs                                                        |  | Ps.                                                        | 3,102.7  |   |        | Ps. | 2,831.2  |        |  | Ps. | 2,854.7  |   |  |  | 0.8    | % 
|Other Information:                                                           |  |                                                            |          |   |        |     |          |        |  |     |          |   |  |  |        |   
|Total workload units(3)                                                      |  |                                                            | 21,775.8 |   |        |     | 22,905.2 |        |  |     | 24,842.6 |   |  |  | 8.5    | % 
|Cost of services per workload unit                                           |  | Ps.                                                        | 45.3     |   |        | Ps. | 46.3     |        |  | Ps. | 45.4     |   |  |  | (1.9   | %)
|Cost of services / the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues
(4) |  |                                                            | 25.3     | % |        |     | 24.2     | %      |  |     | 23.6     | % |  |  |        |   



|(1) | Reflects depreciation of Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Reflects amortization of our improvements of concession assets, concessions and other acquired rights.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | In thousands. Under the regulation applicable to our aeronautical revenues, a workload unit is equivalent to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Cost of services divided by the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, expressed as a percentage.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



96



---

##### Table of Contents

Cost of Services

Our cost of services consists primarily of employee costs, maintenance, safety, security and insurance costs, as well as utilities (a portion
of which we recover from our tenants) and various other miscellaneous expenses. Cost of services per workload unit is an indicator that is calculated by dividing cost of services by the workload units for a given period. This indicator is affected
annually by:



| |  |  | Increases and decreases in the different items included in cost of services.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Increases and decreases in the relative number of workload units.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

Therefore, if the cost of
services increases less in proportion to the increase in workload units, the cost of service per workload unit decreases. Similarly, cost of service per workload units increases in periods in which the costs of service remains stable but workload
units declined.

Our cost of services per workload unit was Ps. 45.3 in 2011, Ps. 46.3 in 2012 and Ps. 45.4 in 2013, an increase of 2.1%
from 2011 to 2012 and a decrease of 1.9% from 2012 to 2013. In 2013, cost of services per workload unit decreased 1.9%, as a result of a larger increase in total workload units than the corresponding increase in cost of service. Total workload units
increased 8.5%, and cost of service increased 6.5%. Cost of service increased primarily as a result of a Ps. 64 million increase in other costs, driven primarily by (i) an increase of Ps. 30.4 million for professional fees related to
legal defense and corporate consulting associated with the analysis of prospective new businesses, (ii) a Ps. 5.8 million increase in commissions for advertising, and (iii) a Ps. 7.5 million increase in costs for supplies for
convenience stores. Additionally, during 2012, a penalty of Ps. 11.1 million was applied to a supplier associated with its failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. This penalty represented a one-time decrease in expenses in 2012 that did
not recur in 2013. Such increases were partially offset by a decrease in the reserve for doubtful accounts of Ps. 9.0 million in 2013 and a Ps. 12.0 million decrease in employee costs, mainly as a result of the completion of our
restructuring of our security checkpoint personnel, the staffing of which has been outsourced to a third party. Our income from operations divided by the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues (operating margin) increased 130 basis points
from 48.3% in 2012 to 49.6% in 2013.

Technical Assistance Fee and Concession Tax

Under the technical assistance agreement, AMP provides management and consulting services as well as technical assistance and technological and
industry knowledge and experience to us in exchange for a fee. This agreement is more fully described in Item 7 hereof. Since January 1, 2002, the fee has been equal to the greater of U.S.$ 4.0 million (adjusted annually for U.S.
inflation) and 5% of our annual consolidated operating income, defined as earnings before interest income or expense (calculated prior to deducting the technical assistance fee, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and in each case determined
in accordance with MFRS). In 2011, 2012 and 2013, this fee was Ps. 136.2 million, Ps. 155.1 million and Ps. 171.5 million, respectively.

We are subject to the Mexican Federal Duties Law, which requires each of our airports to pay a concession tax to the Mexican government
currently equal to 5% of the gross annual revenues (excluding revenues from improvements to concession assets) of each concession holder obtained from the use of public domain assets pursuant to the terms of its concession. In 2011, 2012 and 2013,
this tax amounted to Ps. 193.8 million, Ps. 217.3 million and Ps. 237.7 million, respectively. The concession tax rate may



97



---

##### Table of Contents

vary on an annual basis as determined solely by the Mexican Federal Congress, and there can be no assurance that this rate will not increase in the future. If Mexicos Federal Congress
increases the concession tax rate, we are entitled to request an increase in our maximum rates from the Ministry of Communications and Transportation; however, there can be no assurance that the Ministry of Communications and Transportation would
approve our request.

Depreciation and Amortization

Our depreciation and amortization expenses primarily reflect the amortization of our investment in our 12 concessions, which we began
amortizing for accounting purposes in August 1999, the date on which the value of our concessions was determined based on the value assigned by AMP to our Series BB shares as part of its winning bid to acquire its 15% interest in us. In
addition, we amortize the value of certain fixed assets we acquire or build at our airports pursuant to the investment requirements under our Master Development Programs. Moreover, in 2011, 2012 and 2013, we wrote off the remaining balance of
certain additions to and construction of facilities carried out since the beginning of our concession, as they were replaced with new investments as required under the Master Development Program. The amounts of these write offs were Ps.
27.5 million in 2011, Ps. 17.2 million in 2012 and Ps. 3.4 million in 2013. For further information regarding depreciation and amortization expenses, refer to Notes 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

Cost of improvements to concession assets

In conformity with out Master Development Programs we have to invest in additions and upgrades to our concession assets, and these investments
are reflected according to IFRIC 12. In our case, because we hire third parties to provide construction and upgrade services, our costs reflect the amounts paid to third parties, and we do not recognize a premium on the cost of services. Because
revenues from improvements to concession assets are equal to the cost of improvements to concession assets, the application of IFRIC 12 does not have a cash impact on our results.

Taxation

We and each of our subsidiaries
pay taxes on an individual (rather than consolidated) basis.

Beginning January 1, 2008, as a result of changes in the Mexican tax
law, Mexican companies must pay the greater of their income tax (currently determined at a rate of 30% for 2011 to 2013) or a business flat tax rate (Impuesto Empresarial a Tasa Única, or IETU), which replaced the asset tax. IETU is
calculated by applying a tax rate, which since 2010 has been 17.5%, to income based on cash flows. This cash flow income is determined by taking authorized deductions (excluding wages, social security contributions, interest expense and certain
investment expenditures) from total income earned from taxable activities. IETU tax credits are deducted according to procedures established in the IETU tax law. The IETU tax law established that the excess of the income tax over the asset tax could
be recovered during the ten years following the implementation of the IETU tax law by up to 10% of the total asset tax carryforward at December 31, 2007 each year, provided that this amount does not exceed the difference between the income tax
paid in the year and the lowest amount of asset tax paid during each of the three years preceding December 31, 2007. Beginning in 2014, as a result of the 2014 Fiscal Reform, the IETU was repealed. However, the asset tax carryforwards can
continue to be recovered as previously established. The income tax rate was also set at 30% for 2014 and subsequent years.

We regularly
review our deferred tax assets for recoverability, which are reduced as necessary to the extent that a future tax benefit is no longer probable, based on an analysis of historical taxable income, projected future taxable income and the expected
timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. In addition, Mexican tax law allows Mexican companies utilizing tax amortization rates that are lower



98



---

##### Table of Contents

than the maximum allowable rates to modify their tax amortization rates every five years, without exceeding the maximum allowable rate. Beginning in 2000, we utilized rates lower than the 15%
maximum allowable rate to amortize our airport concessions and rights to use airport facilities for tax purposes.

Our effective tax rates
in 2011, 2012 and 2013 were 14%, 16% and 3%, respectively. In 2013, our effective tax rate decreased by 81.3% or 1230 basis points as compared to 2012, resulting primarily from the effects of the 2014 Fiscal Reform on changes in the income tax rates
as well as the elimination of the IETU, which impacted our deferred income tax balances. In 2012, our effective tax rate increased to 16%, an increase of 200 basis points as compared to 2011, resulting from an increase in our current tax expense
derived from an increase in our earnings before income taxes of 12.1%, whereas our deferred tax income remained relatively stable. We paid Ps. 550.3 million, Ps. 531.8 million and Ps. 607.8 million in corporate taxes in 2011, 2012 and
2013, respectively, representing 29.4%, 25.3% and 26.2% of our earnings before taxes.

According to the mechanism established to recover
existing asset tax credit carryforwards, which ultimately benefit us, we have ten years beginning in 2008 to recover those existing asset tax credits. Every year, we review and adjust, as necessary, our financial projections based on new
expectations of revenues, expenses and capital expenditures, whether for our Master Development Programs, for new maximum tariffs or new passenger traffic projections. Based on these changes which resulted in our ability to recover tax on assets
that was previously determined to be unrecoverable, coupled with our financial projections from 2008 to 2017, we recognized in 2007 Ps. 354.9 million associated with a recoverable tax on assets paid in previous years. In 2011, we increased the
recoverable asset by Ps. 19.0 million, based on revised financial projections from 2012 to 2017. The recoverable tax on assets decreased Ps. 32.3 million due to a refund requested and received in 2011. In 2012, we decreased the recoverable
asset by Ps. 16.1 million, based on revised financial projections from 2013 to 2017. The recoverable tax on assets decreased Ps. 49.5 million due to a refund requested and received in 2012. In 2013, we increased the recoverable tax on
assets by Ps. 5.2 million, based on revised financial projections from 2014 to 2017. The recoverable tax on assets decreased Ps. 57.2 million due to a refund requested and received in 2013.

Employee Profit Sharing

We are
subject to the statutory employee profit sharing regime established under the Mexican Federal Labor Law (Ley Federal del Trabajo). Under this regime, 10% of each unconsolidated companys annual profits (as calculated for tax purposes)
must be distributed among its employees, other than its chief executive officer. As a result of the 2014 Fiscal Reform, Mexican companies must change the way they calculate the employee profit sharing for 2014. The profit sharing is derived from the
taxable income for the year as adjusted by the income tax for the year as modified per certain provisions; however, these changes do not have a material impact on our results.

Employee Retirement Plans

Under Mexican
legislation, we must make payments equivalent to 2% of our workers comprehensive daily salary to a defined contribution plan that is part of the retirement savings system. The expense was Ps. 4.3 million in 2011 and 2012, and Ps.
4.2 million in 2013.



99



---

##### Table of Contents

Effects of Devaluation and Inflation

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage that the Mexican peso depreciated or appreciated against the U.S.
dollar, the Mexican inflation rate, the U.S. inflation rate, and the percentage that the Mexican gross domestic product, or GDP, changed as compared to the previous period.



|                                                                                  |  |                         |      |   |      |  |      |      |  |  |     |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | ---- |  |  | --- | -
|                                                                                  |  | Year ended December 31, |     
|                                                                                  |  | 2011                    |      |   | 2012 |  |      | 2013 | 
|Depreciation (appreciation) of the Mexican peso as compared to the U.S.
dollar(1) |  |                         | 13.1 | % |      |  | (6.9 | )%   |  |  | 0.5 | %
|Mexican inflation rate(2)                                                         |  |                         | 3.8  | % |      |  | 3.6  | %    |  |  | 4.0 | %
|U.S. inflation rate(3)                                                            |  |                         | 2.9  | % |      |  | 1.7  | %    |  |  | 1.5 | %
|Increase in Mexican gross domestic product(4)                                     |  |                         | 3.9  | % |      |  | 3.9  | %    |  |  | 1.1 | %



|(1) | Based on changes in the rates for calculating foreign exchange liabilities, as reported by Banco de México, the Mexican Central Bank, at the end of each period, which were as follows: Ps. 13.9787 per U.S.$
1.00 as of December 31, 2011, Ps. 13.0101 per U.S.$ 1.00 as of December 31, 2012 and Ps. 13.0765 per U.S.$1.00 on December 31, 2013.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Based on changes in the Mexican Consumer Price Index from the previous period, as reported by the Mexican National Institute for Statistics and Geography (INEGI). The Mexican Consumer Price Index at year end was:
103.551 in 2011, 107.246 in 2012 and 111.508 in 2013.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | As reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | In real terms, as reported by INEGI on February 21, 2014.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------

The general condition of the Mexican economy,
changes in the value of the peso as compared to the dollar, inflation and high interest rates have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our:



| |  |  | Depreciation and amortization expense. According to IFRS, if inflation rates over a three-year period approach or exceed 100.0%, the incorporation of inflation in an entitys financial statements becomes
necessary. Therefore, non-monetary assets would be restated, and as a result depreciation and amortization of those assets would be higher, negatively affecting our net income.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Passenger charges. Passenger charges for international passengers are currently denominated in dollars, but are invoiced and collected in pesos. Meanwhile, passenger charges for domestic passengers are
denominated in pesos. Consequently, an appreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar could cause declines in our revenues from passenger charges for international passengers and consequently our aeronautical revenues. This would also produce a
decline in peso-denominated revenues when compared with the previous year, because our tariffs for the services we provide to international flights or international passengers are denominated in U.S. dollars but are generally invoiced and paid for
in Mexican pesos based on the average exchange rate for the month prior to each flight on which the charge is incurred.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Finance income (cost).As required by IFRS, our finance income (cost) reflects gains or losses from foreign exchange and gains and losses from interest earned or incurred, and as a consequence a depreciation or
appreciation of the peso would impact the finance income (cost).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Maximum rates in pesos.Our tariffs for the services we provide to international flights or international passengers are denominated in U.S.
dollars, but are generally invoiced and paid in Mexican pesos based on the average exchange rate for the month prior to each flight. During 2011, 2012 and 2013, we collected passenger charges from airlines within an average period of 65, 57 and 59
days, respectively. We intend to charge prices that are as close as possible to the maximum rates that we can charge. Since we are usually only entitled to adjust our specific prices once every six months (or earlier upon a cumulative increase of 5%
in the Mexican Producer Price Index, excluding petroleum), a depreciation of the peso as compared to the dollar, particularly late in the year, could cause us to exceed the maximum
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



100



---

##### Table of Contents

| | rates at one or more of our airports, possibly leading to the termination of one of our concessions if it is repeated and sanctioned by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation at least
three times. In the event that any one of our concessions is terminated, our other concessions may also be terminated. In addition, if the peso appreciates as compared to the dollar we may underestimate the specific prices we can charge for
regulated services and be unable to adjust our prices upwards to maximize our regulated revenues.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Non-aeronautical revenues.In addition, some of our non-aeronautical revenue contracts are denominated and invoiced in U.S. dollars; however, some of them are collected in Mexican pesos. Consequently, an
appreciation of the peso against the U.S. dollar would cause declines in our revenues from these U.S. dollar-denominated contracts.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results of operations by subsidiary

Historically, our most profitable airports have been our Guadalajara, Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta international airports, which handle the
majority of our international passengers. We determine profitability per airport by dividing income from operations at each airport by total revenues for that airport. Operating margins at our Tijuana International Airport historically have been
lower than at our other principal airports because the maximum rates applicable to aeronautical services provided at our Tijuana International Airport are lower than those applicable to our other principal airports. This is because the amortization
of our concession relative to the level of revenues is much higher at our Tijuana International Airport than at our other principal airports because the original concession value assigned to the Tijuana International Airport was proportionately
higher.

The following table sets forth our results of operations for the years indicated for each of our principal airports and our other
subsidiaries.

Results of Operations by Subsidiary



|                                   |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | -
|                                   |  | Subsidiary Operating Results             |          
|                                   |  | Year ended December 31,                  |          
|                                   |  | 2011                                     |           |   | 2012 |     |           | 2013 | 
|                                   |  | (thousands of pesos, except percentages) |          
|Guadalajara:                       |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 1,141,167 |   |      | Ps. | 1,221,886 |      |  | Ps. | 1,313,433 |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 287,174   |   |      |     | 339,221   |      |  |     | 383,074   |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 1,428,342 |   |      |     | 1,561,107 |      |  |     | 1,696,507 |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 189,794   |   |      |     | 132,211   |      |  |     | 239,182   |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 1,618,136 |   |      |     | 1,693,318 |      |  |     | 1,935,689 |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 771,067   |   |      |     | 778,299   |      |  |     | 878,901   |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 367,965   |   |      |     | 405,500   |      |  |     | 403,263   |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 189,794   |   |      |     | 132,211   |      |  |     | 239,182   |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 210,171   |   |      |     | 240,538   |      |  |     | 236,456   |  
|Other expense                      |  |                                          | 3,137     |   |      |     | 50        |      |  |     | 0         |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 847,069   |   |      |     | 915,019   |      |  |     | 1,056,789 |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 52.35     | % |      |     | 54.04     | %    |  |     | 54.60     | %
|Tijuana:                           |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 437,238   |   |      | Ps. | 486,674   |      |  | Ps. | 546,309   |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 92,010    |   |      |     | 113,157   |      |  |     | 136,413   |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 529,248   |   |      |     | 599,831   |      |  |     | 682,722   |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 157,310   |   |      |     | 49,762    |      |  |     | 9,433     |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 686,558   |   |      |     | 649,593   |      |  |     | 692,155   |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 474,492   |   |      |     | 408,030   |      |  |     | 367,456   |  



101



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                   |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | -------- | -
|                                   |  | Subsidiary Operating Results             |          
|                                   |  | Year ended December 31,                  |          
|                                   |  | 2011                                     |           |   | 2012 |     |         | 2013 | 
|                                   |  | (thousands of pesos, except percentages) |          
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 200,089   |   |      |     | 227,948 |      |  |     | 227,182  |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 157,310   |   |      |     | 49,762  |      |  |     | 9,433    |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 117,077   |   |      |     | 130,316 |      |  |     | 130,842  |  
|Other expense                      |  |                                          | 16        |   |      |     | 4       |      |  |     | 0        |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 212,066   |   |      |     | 241,563 |      |  |     | 324,698  |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 30.89     | % |      |     | 37.19   | %    |  |     | 46.91    | %
|Los Cabos:                         |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 485,138   |   |      | Ps. | 543,341 |      |  | Ps. | 604,215  |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 191,352   |   |      |     | 268,588 |      |  |     | 335,339  |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 676,490   |   |      |     | 811,929 |      |  |     | 939,554  |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 366,186   |   |      |     | 173,878 |      |  |     | 13,872   |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 1,042,676 |   |      |     | 985,807 |      |  |     | 953,427  |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 637,479   |   |      |     | 498,479 |      |  |     | 426,274  |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 177,637   |   |      |     | 209,106 |      |  |     | 247,345  |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 366,186   |   |      |     | 173,878 |      |  |     | 13,872   |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 93,048    |   |      |     | 115,384 |      |  |     | 165,055  |  
|Other expense                      |  |                                          | 608       |   |      |     | 111     |      |  |     | 0        |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 405,197   |   |      |     | 487,328 |      |  |     | 527,153  |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 38.86     | % |      |     | 49.43   | %    |  |     | 55.29    | %
|Puerto Vallarta:                   |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 423,820   |   |      | Ps. | 451,560 |      |  | Ps. | 460,433  |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 142,293   |   |      |     | 159,754 |      |  |     | 166,496  |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 566,114   |   |      |     | 611,314 |      |  |     | 626,930  |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 207,288   |   |      |     | 88,139  |      |  |     | 23,716   |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 773,402   |   |      |     | 699,453 |      |  |     | 650,646  |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 497,407   |   |      |     | 401,100 |      |  |     | 346,353  |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 175,741   |   |      |     | 194,550 |      |  |     | 195,946  |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 207,288   |   |      |     | 88,139  |      |  |     | 23,716   |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 111,430   |   |      |     | 118,503 |      |  |     | 126,690  |  
|Other expense (income)             |  |                                          | 2,948     |   |      |     | (92     | )    |  |     | 0        |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 275,995   |   |      |     | 298,353 |      |  |     | 304,293  |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 35.69     | % |      |     | 42.66   | %    |  |     | 46.77    | %
|Hermosillo:                        |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 149,920   |   |      | Ps. | 168,732 |      |  | Ps. | 173,831  |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 26,034    |   |      |     | 31,790  |      |  |     | 40,139   |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 175,954   |   |      |     | 200,522 |      |  |     | 213,970  |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 33,792    |   |      |     | 11,564  |      |  |     | 78       |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 209,746   |   |      |     | 212,086 |      |  |     | 214,048  |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 146,517   |   |      |     | 143,766 |      |  |     | 127,888  |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 74,274    |   |      |     | 88,279  |      |  |     | 84,360   |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 33,792    |   |      |     | 11,564  |      |  |     | 78       |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 38,453    |   |      |     | 43,364  |      |  |     | 43,451   |  
|Other (income) expense             |  |                                          | (2        | ) |      |     | 559     |      |  |     | 0        |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 63,229    |   |      |     | 68,320  |      |  |     | 86,160   |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 30.15     | % |      |     | 32.21   | %    |  |     | 40.25    | %
|Guanajuato:                        |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |   |      |     |         |      |  |     |          |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 135,946   |   |      | Ps. | 156,768 |      |  | Ps. | 163,010  |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 31,053    |   |      |     | 34,987  |      |  |     | 40,808   |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 166,999   |   |      |     | 191,755 |      |  |     | 203,818  |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 43,739    |   |      |     | 45,211  |      |  |     | 7,009    |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 210,738   |   |      |     | 236,966 |      |  |     | 210,827  |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 152,526   |   |      |     | 162,998 |      |  |     | 128,6666 |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 71,558    |   |      |     | 79,129  |      |  |     | 80,877   |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 43,739    |   |      |     | 45,211  |      |  |     | 7,009    |  



102



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                   |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | --------- | -- | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | -
|                                   |  | Subsidiary Operating Results             |          
|                                   |  | Year ended December 31,                  |          
|                                   |  | 2011                                     |           |    | 2012 |     |           | 2013 | 
|                                   |  | (thousands of pesos, except percentages) |          
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 37,153    |    |      |     | 38,835    |      |  |     | 40,780    |  
|Other expense (income)             |  |                                          | 76        |    |      |     | (177      | )    |  |     | 0         |  
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 58,212    |    |      |     | 73,968    |      |  |     | 82,161    |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 27.62     | %  |      |     | 31.21     | %    |  |     | 38.97     | %
|Other Airport Subsidiaries(2):     |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 304,697   |    |      | Ps. | 337,021   |      |  | Ps. | 355,385   |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 54,664    |    |      |     | 60,956    |      |  |     | 68,221    |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 359,361   |    |      |     | 397,977   |      |  |     | 423,606   |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 38,119    |    |      |     | 69,468    |      |  |     | 147,437   |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 397,480   |    |      |     | 467,445   |      |  |     | 571,043   |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 400,893   |    |      |     | 455,345   |      |  |     | 549,449   |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 239,790   |    |      |     | 258,167   |      |  |     | 272,450   |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 38,119    |    |      |     | 69,468    |      |  |     | 147,437   |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 123,054   |    |      |     | 127,124   |      |  |     | 129,562   |  
|Other (income) expense             |  |                                          | (70       | )  |      |     | 586       |      |  |     | 0         |  
|(Loss) income from operations      |  |                                          | (3,413    | )  |      |     | 12,100    |      |  |     | 21,594    |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | (0.86     | )% |      |     | 2.59      | %    |  |     | 3.78      | %
|Other Subsidiaries(3):             |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 22,333    |    |      |     | (16,852   | )    |  |     | 30,053    |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 9,877     |    |      |     | (30,310   | )    |  |     | 26,724    |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 12,583    |    |      |     | 13,166    |      |  |     | 10,400    |  
|Other (income) expense             |  |                                          | (126      | )  |      |     | 292       |      |  |     | (7,453    | )
|(Loss) income from operations      |  |                                          | (22,335   | )  |      |     | 16,851    |      |  |     | (30,053   | )
|Total:                             |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Revenues:                          |  |                                          |           |    |      |     |           |      |  |     |           |  
|Aeronautical services              |  | Ps.                                      | 3,077,927 |    |      | Ps. | 3,365,982 |      |  | Ps. | 3,616,616 |  
|Non-aeronautical services          |  |                                          | 824,580   |    |      |     | 1,008,452 |      |  |     | 1,170,492 |  
|                                   |  |                                          | 3,902,507 |    |      |     | 4,374,434 |      |  |     | 4,787,108 |  
|Improvements to concession assets  |  |                                          | 1,036,227 |    |      |     | 570,233   |      |  |     | 440,728   |  
|Total revenues                     |  |                                          | 4,938,734 |    |      |     | 4,944,667 |      |  |     | 5,227,836 |  
|Total costs                        |  |                                          | 3,102,714 |    |      |     | 2,831,165 |      |  |     | 2,854,659 |  
|Costs of operations(4)             |  |                                          | 1,316,931 |    |      |     | 1,432,369 |      |  |     | 1,538,149 |  
|Cost of improvements to concession |  |                                          | 1,036,227 |    |      |     | 570,233   |      |  |     | 440,728   |  
|Depreciation and amortization      |  |                                          | 742,969   |    |      |     | 827,230   |      |  |     | 883,235   |  
|Other expense                      |  |                                          | 6,587     |    |      |     | 1,333     |      |  |     | (7,453    | )
|Income from operations             |  |                                          | 1,836,020 |    |      |     | 2,113,502 |      |  |     | 2,373,177 |  
|Operating margin(1)                |  |                                          | 37.2      | %  |      |     | 42.7      | %    |  |     | 45.4      | %



|(1) | We determine operating margin per airport by dividing income from operations at each airport or group of airports by total revenues for that airport or group of airports.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Reflects the results of operations of our Morelia, La Paz, Aguascalientes, Mexicali, Los Mochis and Manzanillo airports.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Other subsidiaries data reflects the results of operations of our administrative, operating and car parking services providers.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Cost of operations includes cost of services, technical assistance fees and concession taxes.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



103



---

##### Table of Contents

Summary Historical Results of Operations

The following table sets forth a summary of our consolidated results of operations for the years indicated.



|                                          |  |                                        |           |   |        |     |           |        |  |     |           |   |  |  |         |   
|----------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ------ | --- | --------- | ------ |  | --- | --------- | - |  |  | ------- | --
|                                          |  | Summary Consolidated Operating Results |          
|                                          |  | Year ended December 31,                |          
|                                          |  | 2011                                   |           |   | 2012   |     |           | 2013   | 
|                                          |  | Amount                                 |           |   | Amount |     |           | Amount |  |     | % change  |  
|Revenues:                                 |  |                                        |           |   |        |     |           |        |  |     |           |  
|Aeronautical services                     |  | Ps.                                    | 3,077,927 |   |        | Ps. | 3,365,982 |        |  | Ps. | 3,616,616 |   |  |  | 7.4     | % 
|Non-aeronautical services                 |  |                                        | 824,580   |   |        |     | 1,008,452 |        |  |     | 1,170,492 |   |  |  | 16.1    | % 
|                                          |  |                                        | 3,902,507 |   |        |     | 4,374,434 |        |  |     | 4,787,108 |   |  |  | 9.4     | % 
|Improvements to concession assets         |  |                                        | 1,036,227 |   |        |     | 570,233   |        |  |     | 440,728   |   |  |  | (22.7   | )%
|Total revenues                            |  |                                        | 4,938,734 |   |        |     | 4,944,667 |        |  |     | 5,227,836 |   |  |  | 5.7     | % 
|Operating costs:                          |  |                                        |           |   |        |     |           |        |  |     |           |  
|Cost of services                          |  |                                        | 986,938   |   |        |     | 1,060,002 |        |  |     | 1,128,951 |   |  |  | 6.5     | % 
|Technical assistance fees                 |  |                                        | 136,191   |   |        |     | 155,072   |        |  |     | 171,470   |   |  |  | 10.6    | % 
|Concession taxes                          |  |                                        | 193,802   |   |        |     | 217,295   |        |  |     | 237,728   |   |  |  | 9.4     | % 
|Depreciation and amortization             |  |                                        | 742,969   |   |        |     | 827,230   |        |  |     | 883,235   |   |  |  | 6.8     | % 
|Other expense (income)                    |  |                                        | 6,587     |   |        |     | 1,333     |        |  |     | (7,453    | ) |  |  | (659.1  | )%
|Cost of improvements to concession assets |  |                                        | 1,036,227 |   |        |     | 570,233   |        |  |     | 440,728   |   |  |  | (22.7   | )%
|Total costs                               |  |                                        | 3,102,714 |   |        |     | 2,831,165 |        |  |     | 2,854,659 |   |  |  | 0.8     | % 
|Income from operations                    |  |                                        | 1,836,020 |   |        |     | 2,113,502 |        |  |     | 2,373,177 |   |  |  | 12.3    | % 
|Finance income (cost)                     |  |                                        |           |   |        |     |           |        |  |     |           |  
|Interest income, net                      |  |                                        | 14,692    |   |        |     | 759       |        |  |     | (54,922   | ) |  |  | (7336.2 | )%
|Exchange gain (loss), net                 |  |                                        | 22,626    |   |        |     | (14,782   | )      |  |     | 3,763     |   |  |  | (125.5  | )%
|Net finance (cost) income                 |  |                                        | 37,318    |   |        |     | (14,023   | )      |  |     | (51,159   | ) |  |  | 264.8   | % 
|Income before income taxes                |  |                                        | 1,873,338 |   |        |     | 2,099,479 |        |  |     | 2,322,018 |   |  |  | 10.6    | % 
|Income tax expense                        |  |                                        | 261,758   |   |        |     | 327,449   |        |  |     | 75,788    |   |  |  | (76.9   | )%
|Consolidated net income                   |  |                                        | 1,611,580 |   |        |     | 1,772,030 |        |  |     | 2,246,230 |   |  |  | 26.8    | % 
|Other operating data (unaudited):         |  |                                        |           |   |        |     |           |        |  |     |           |  
|Operating margin(1)                       |  |                                        | 37.2      | % |        |     | 42.7      | %      |  |     | 45.4      | % |  |  |         |   
|Net margin(2)                             |  |                                        | 32.6      | % |        |     | 35.8      | %      |  |     | 43.0      | % |  |  |         |   



|(1) | Income from operations divided by total revenues, expressed as a percentage.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Net income divided by total revenues, expressed as a percentage.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Results of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012

Revenues

Total revenues for 2013 increased 5.7%, from Ps. 4,944.7 million in 2012 to Ps. 5,227.8 million in 2013, due to an increase of Ps.
250.6 million in aeronautical services revenues and an increase of Ps.162.0 million in non-aeronautical services revenues. This was partially offset by a Ps.129.5 million decrease in revenues from improvements to concession assets as a result
of the committed investments outlined in our Master Development Programs, which for 2013 were less than the corresponding amounts in 2012.

Aeronautical services revenues increased 7.4%, from Ps. 3,366.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 3,616.6 million in 2013, primarily due to an
8.9% increase in passenger traffic compared to 2012, a 0.1% increase in the Mexican Producer Price Index excluding petroleum and a 2.25% increase in specific tariffs as of April 2013. Revenues from passenger charges increased 8.9% or Ps.251.2
million primarily driven by a 9.0% increase in passengers that paid passenger charges and the increase in specific tariffs as of June 2013. During 2013, revenues from aircraft landing and parking fees increased 3.9%, or Ps. 12.6 million, while
revenues from the leasing of spaces to airlines for ticket counter, airport security and back office space and complementary services increased 5.8%, or Ps. 9.5 million. The increase in aeronautical revenues was partially offset by a decrease in
revenues from operations of airbuses and passenger walkways which declined a combined Ps. 22.6 million, due to the fact that we stopped providing these services directly as of November 2012, whereupon they were taken over by a third-party
provider.

Non-aeronautical services revenues for 2013 increased Ps. 162.0 million, or 16.1%, from Ps. 1,008.5 million in 2012
to Ps. 1,170.5 million in 2013. The primary factor influencing the change in non-aeronautical revenues from 2012 to 2013 was the Ps. 115.0 million increase in businesses operated by



104



---

##### Table of Contents

third parties, which was principally derived from increases in revenues from leasing of space, car rentals, food and beverage operations, retail operations, duty free operations, communications
services and time share developers. This increase in non-aeronautical revenues was partially offset by a decrease in other commercial revenues of Ps. 38.4 million, mainly due to a one-time payment to us of Ps. 31.7 million, which we
received in 2012 for contract assignments that did not recur in 2013. In addition, revenues from the businesses operated by us increased by Ps. 88.9 million, mainly driven by car parking charges, revenues related to the operation of the baggage
screening systems, VIP lounges, convenience stores and advertising.

Revenues from improvements to concession assets in 2013 decreased
Ps. 129.5 million, or 22.7%, from Ps. 570.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 440.7 million in 2013. The main factor that determines the change in revenues from improvements to concession assets from 2012 to 2013 was a decrease in our
commitments under the Master Development Programs for 2013. During 2013, the main commitments of improvements to concession assets included: (i) the expansion of the terminals at the Guadalajara, La Paz, Mexicali and Los Cabos airports, and
(ii) the adaptation of the Tijuana terminal for the international bridge and the construction of the bridge.

Revenues by Airport

Total revenues at most of our airports increased, mainly due to the increase in aeronautical services revenues.

At the Guadalajara airport, revenues increased by 14.3% or Ps. 242.4 million, from Ps. 1,693.3 million in 2012 to Ps.
1,935.7 million in 2013 (revenues increased 8.7% or Ps.135.4 million taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased 7.5% or Ps. 91.5 million, from Ps.
1,221.9 million in 2012 to Ps. 1,313.4 million in 2013, due to a Ps. 105.8 million or 9.5% increase in passenger charges driven by a 9.6% increase in passenger traffic and a 2.25% increase in tariffs due to inflation. The increase in
aeronautical revenues was partially offset by a decrease in revenues from the operation of airbuses and passenger walkways, which declined a combined Ps. 14.2 million due to the fact that we stopped providing these services directly as of
November 2012, whereupon they were taken over by a third-party provider. Non-aeronautical revenues increased 12.9% or Ps. 43.9 million, from Ps. 339.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 383.1 million in 2013, primarily due to a Ps.
19.0 million increase in revenues from businesses operated by third parties, such as leasing of space, food and beverage operations, car rentals and retail operations. Revenues from business lines operated by us increased Ps. 24.9 million,
principally as a result of increased revenues from car parking charges, revenues related to the operation of the baggage screening systems, advertising and VIP lounges. Revenues from improvements to concession assets increased Ps. 106.9 million
(an increase of 8.7% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services).

At the Tijuana airport, revenues
increased by 6.6% or Ps. 42.6 million, from Ps. 649.6 million in 2012 to Ps. 692.2 million in 2013, mainly due to a 12.2% or Ps. 59.6 million increase in aeronautical revenues, from Ps. 486.7 million in 2012 to Ps.
546.3 million in 2013 (revenues increased 13.8% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). This increase was due to an increase in passenger charges of Ps. 50.0 million as well as in revenues from
landing and aircraft parking charges, which together increased Ps. 8.9 million. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 20.5% or Ps. 23.2 million, from Ps. 113.2 million in 2012 to Ps.136.4 million in 2013, primarily due to an increase of
Ps. 17.5 million from business lines operated by us, including car parking, VIP lounges and advertising. In addition, revenues from business lines operated by third parties increased Ps. 9.6 million, including from leasing of space, food
and beverage operations, retail operations, car rentals and leasing of duty free stores. These increases were offset by a decrease of Ps. 3.8 million in revenues related to the operation of the baggage screening systems, due to reductions in
use of this service by some airlines during select months of 2013. Revenues from improvements to concession assets decreased Ps. 40.3 million.



105



---

##### Table of Contents

At the Los Cabos airport, revenues decreased by 3.4% or Ps. 32.4 million, from Ps.
985.8 million in 2012 to Ps. 953.4 million in 2013, mainly due to a decrease of Ps. 160 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased 15.7% or Ps. 127.6 million taking into account only revenues
from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 11.2% or Ps.60.9 million, from Ps. 543.3 million in 2012 to Ps. 604.2 million in 2013, due to an increase in passenger charges of Ps. 55.4 million,
driven by a 12% increase in total passenger traffic and the 2.25% increase in tariffs due to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 24.8% or Ps. 66.7 million, from Ps. 268.6 million in 2012 to Ps. 335.3 million in 2013,
primarily due to a Ps. 70.6 million increase in revenues from business lines operated by third parties, including leasing of space, food and beverage operations, car rentals, leasing of space to time share developers and duty free operations,
as well as a Ps. 31.8 million increase in revenues from business lines operated by us, including convenience stores, revenues related to the operation of the baggage screening systems, advertising and VIP lounges. This increase was partially
offset by a decrease of Ps. 38.3 million in other commercial revenues due to a one-time payment to the Company of Ps. 31.7 million in 2012 for contract assignments that did not recur in 2013.

At the Puerto Vallarta airport, revenues decreased by 7.0% or Ps. 48.9 million, from Ps. 699.5 million in 2012 to Ps.
650.6 million in 2013, mainly due to a decrease of Ps. 64.4 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased by 2.6% or Ps. 15.6 million taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and
non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 1.9% or Ps. 8.8 million, from Ps. 451.6 million in 2012 to Ps. 460.4 million in 2013, due to an increase in passenger charges of Ps. 12.9 million caused by a 2.8%
increase in passenger traffic and a 2.25% increase in tariffs due to inflation, whereas revenues from landing and aircraft parking charges increased a combined Ps. 1.0 million. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 4.2%, or Ps. 6.7 million,
from Ps. 159.8 million in 2012 to Ps. 166.5 million in 2013, primarily due to increased revenues from business lines operated by us of Ps. 9.0 million, including revenues related to the operation of the baggage screening systems, as well
as a Ps. 5.9 million increase in revenues from businesses operated by third parties, including retail operations, leasing of space to time share developers and other commercial spaces. This increase in non-aeronautical revenues was partially
offset by a Ps. 8.1 million decrease in revenues from duty free operations, car rentals, leasing of space, advertising and car parking charges.

At the Hermosillo airport, revenues increased by 0.9% or Ps. 1.9 million, from Ps. 212.1 million in 2012 to Ps. 214.0 million
in 2013, primarily due to an increase in aeronautical revenues resulting from a 3.2% increase in passenger traffic and a 2.25% increase in tariffs related to inflation (revenues increased 6.7%, or Ps. 13.5 million, taking into account only
revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 3.0% or Ps. 5.1 million, from Ps. 168.7 million in 2012 to Ps. 173.8 million in 2013. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 26.3% or Ps.
8.3 million, from Ps. 31.8 million in 2012 to Ps. 40.1 million in 2013, primarily due to a Ps. 5.7 million increase in revenues from business lines operated by us related to the operation of the baggage screening systems,
advertising and VIP lounges, as well as due to a Ps. 2.6 million increase in revenues from business lines operated by third parties was primarily the result of leasing of space, food and beverage operations, car rentals, other commercial
revenues and financial services. The increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues was partially offset by a decrease of Ps. 11.5 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets in 2013 as compared to 2012.

At the Guanajuato airport, revenues decreased by 11.0% or Ps. 26.2 million, from Ps. 237.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 210.8 million
in 2013, mainly due to a decrease of 84.5% or Ps. 38.2 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets from Ps. 45.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 7.0 million in 2013 (revenues increased 6.3%, or Ps. 12.0 million taking into
account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 4.0% from Ps. 156.8 million in 2012 to Ps. 163.0 million in 2013, mainly due to a 5.0% increase in passenger traffic and a 2.25%
increase in tariffs related to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 16.6% or Ps. 5.8 million, from Ps. 35.0



106



---

##### Table of Contents

million in 2012 to Ps. 40.8 million in 2013. This increase is a result of a Ps. 3.7 million increase in revenues from businesses operated by us, including increases in advertising and
revenues related to the operation of the baggage screening systems, as well as a Ps. 2.2 million increase in revenues from businesses operated by third parties associated with the leasing of space, car rentals and communications services.

Revenues at our other 6 airports increased by 22.2% or Ps. 103.6 million, from Ps. 467.4 million in 2012 to Ps. 571.0 million
in 2013, mainly due to an increase of 112.1%, or Ps. 77.9 million from Ps. 69.5 million in 2012 to Ps. 147.4 million in 2013, in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased 6.4%, or Ps. 25.6 million taking
into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues at these airports increased by 5.4% or Ps.18.4 million, from Ps. 337.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 355.4 million in 2013, mainly due to a 5.9%
increase in passenger traffic and a 2.25% increase in tariffs, due to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 11.8% or Ps. 7.2 million, from Ps. 61.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 68.2 million in 2013, primarily due to a combined
Ps. 4.7 million increase in leasing of space and communications services, as well as an increase in business lines operated by us of Ps. 2.5 million, mainly from revenues from car parking charges and advertising.

Total Costs

Cost of Services

Cost of services, which is comprised of employee costs, maintenance, safety, security, insurance, utilities and other expenses, increased by
Ps. 68.9 million, or 6.5%, from Ps. 1.0 billion in 2012 to Ps. 1.1 billion in 2013. Other costs increased 40.4% or Ps. 64.0 million mainly due to higher professional services fee primarily due to higher legal expenses. Safety, security and
insurance expenses increased 9.0%, or Ps. 14.4 million, due to the outsourcing of certain of our check-point staff, the implementation of additional security measures required by airport authorities related to checking for liquids carried by
boarding passengers and outsourcing the operation of the new baggage screening system equipment at our airports to a third party. Utility expenses increased 1.7%, or Ps. 2.4 million, mainly due to an increase in electricity rates and higher
consumption of electricity as a result of the expansion of our terminals, the operation of new baggage screening system equipment, in part related with the fulfillment of our Master Development Programs during 2013. Maintenance expenses increased
0.1% or Ps. 0.2 million mainly due to routine maintenance on runways, security equipment, machinery and equipment, in addition to major maintenance undertaken in certain operational areas. This increase was partially offset by a 3.0% or Ps.
12.0 million decrease in employee costs, mainly due to the to the outsourcing of certain of our check-point staff and the personnel responsible for operating our airbuses and walkways.

The main airport that contributed to the increase in the cost of services for 2013 was the Los Cabos airport. The cost of services at our Los
Cabos airport increased from Ps. 149.4 million in 2012 to Ps. 181.1 million in 2013, or 21.2%, mainly as a result of the increase in electricity consumption due to the operation of the new terminal building, and the costs and expenses
incurred by our direct operation of the convenience stores. In addition, we experienced, at the corporate level, an increase of Ps. 30.4 million, or 45.1%, in professional fees, reflecting an increase in fees for legal defense, corporate
consulting and the evaluation of new businesses.

Technical Assistance Fee and Concession Tax

The technical assistance fee increased 10.6%, or Ps. 16.4 million, from Ps. 155.1 million in 2012 to Ps. 171.5 million in 2013.
This increase was mainly due to an increase in our consolidated income from operations, which is used to calculate this fee. See Item 4,Information on the Company  History and Development of the Company  Investment by
AMP.



107



---

##### Table of Contents

As a result of increased revenues (excluding revenues from improvements to concession assets as
they do not form part of income for purposes of the government concession tax), government concession taxes increased 9.4%, from Ps. 217.3 million in 2012 to Ps. 237.7 million in 2013.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased 6.8% or Ps. 56.0 million, from Ps. 827.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 883.2 million in 2013,
mainly due to the growth in infrastructure resulting from our fulfillment of our Master Development Programs and our commitment to provide better services to our clients. The amortization of concessions did not fluctuate materially.

Cost of improvements to concession assets

Cost of improvements to concession assets in 2013 decreased Ps. 129.5 million, or 22.7%, from Ps. 570.2 million in 2012 to Ps.
440.7 million in 2013. The primary factor influencing the decrease in cost of improvements to concession assets from 2012 to 2013 was the change in amounts allocated in our Master Development Programs for 2013 as compared to 2012.

Operating Costs by Airport

Operating
costs at our airports increased by Ps. 23.5 million or 0.8% mainly due to the 6.5% increase in cost of services and the 6.8% increase in other expenses. The increases in cost of services, other expenses and items such as amortization of
concessions and technical assistance fees were mostly offset by a Ps. 129.5 million or 22.7% decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets described above.

Operating costs for the Guadalajara airport were Ps. 878.9 million in 2013, a 12.9% or Ps. 100.6 million increase from the Ps.
778.3 million recorded in 2012. This increase was primarily due to a 80.9% or Ps. 107.0 million increase in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 132.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 239.2 million in 2013. The increase
was partially offset by a Ps. 2.2 million decrease in the cost of services, mainly in employee costs, utilities and advertising commissions, as well as a Ps. 4.2 million decrease in depreciation and amortization (operating costs decreased
Ps. 6.4 million or 1.0% without including the cost of improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Tijuana airport
decreased Ps. 40.6 million or 9.9%, to Ps. 367.5 million in 2013 from Ps. 408.0 million in 2012. This decrease was due to a 81.0% or Ps. 40.3 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets, from Ps.
49.8 million in 2012 to Ps. 9.4 million in 2013, and an increase of Ps. 0.5 million in depreciation and amortization (operating costs decreased 0.1% or Ps. 0.2 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Los Cabos airport decreased 14.5% or Ps. 72.2 million, to Ps. 426.3 million in 2013 from the Ps.
498.5 million recorded in 2012. This decrease was mainly due to a 92.0% or Ps. 160.0 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 173.9 million in 2012 to Ps. 13.9 million in 2013. This decrease was
partially offset by a Ps. 38.1 million increase in the cost of services, mainly in maintenance, utilities, safety security and insurance and doubtful accounts, in addition to a Ps. 49.7 million increase in depreciation and amortization
(operating costs increased 27.0% or Ps. 87.7 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the
Puerto Vallarta airport decreased 13.6% or Ps. 54.7 million, to Ps. 346.4 million in 2013 from Ps. 401.1 million in 2012. This decrease was primarily due to a 73.1% or Ps. 64.4 million decrease in the cost of improvements to
concession assets from Ps. 88.1 million in 2012 to Ps. 23.7 million in 2013, and Ps. 1.1 million decrease in the cost of services, mainly in doubtful accounts. The decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 8.2 million increase in
depreciation and amortization (operating costs increased 3.0% or Ps. 9.5 million without including of improvements to concession assets).



108



---

##### Table of Contents

Operating costs for the Hermosillo airport decreased 11.0% or Ps. 15.9 million, to Ps.
127.9 million in 2013 from the Ps. 143.8 million recorded in 2012. This decrease was due to a 99.3% or Ps. 11.5 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 11.6 million in 2012 to Ps.
0.1 million in 2013. The cost of services decreased Ps. 4.9 million, mainly in maintenance and professional fees, and depreciation and amortization increased Ps. 0.1 million (operating costs decreased 3.3% or Ps. 4.4 million
without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Guanajuato airport decreased 21.0% or Ps.
34.3 million, from the Ps. 163.0 million recorded in 2012 to Ps. 128.7 million in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a 84.5% or Ps. 38.2 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets, from Ps.
45.2 million in 2012 to Ps. 7.0 million in 2013, and a Ps. 1.8 million decrease in the cost of services, mainly in employee costs and maintenance fees. The decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 2.0 million increase in
depreciation and amortization (operating costs increased 3.3% or Ps. 3.8 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for our 6 other airports increased 20.7% or Ps. 94.1 million, from the Ps. 455.3 million recorded in 2012 to Ps.
549.4 million in 2013. This increase was primarily due to a 112.1% or Ps.77.9 million increase in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 69.5 million in 2012 to Ps. 147.4 million in 2013. Additionally, the cost of
services increased Ps.14.8 million, and depreciation and amortization increased Ps. 2.4 million (operating costs increased 4.2% or Ps. 16.1 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Income from Operations

Operating
income increased 12.3%, or Ps. 259.7 million, from Ps. 2.1 billion in 2012 to Ps. 2.4 billion in 2013. This increase was due to higher revenue in 2013, which was partially offset by increases in expenses. Our operating margin increased 270
basis points, from 42.7% in 2012 to 45.4% in 2013 (taking into account only the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, the operating margin increased 130 basis points from 48.3% to 49.6% in 2013).

Income from Operations by Airport

Operating margin is calculated by dividing income from operations at each airport by total revenues for that airport. Historically, our most
profitable airports have been our Guadalajara, Los Cabos and Puerto Vallarta international airports, which handle the majority of our international passengers. Operating margins at our Tijuana International Airport historically have been lower than
at our other principal airports because the maximum rates applicable to aeronautical services provided at our Tijuana International Airport are lower than those applicable to our other principal airports. This is because the amortization of our
concession relative to the level of revenues is much higher at our Tijuana International Airport than at our other principal airports due to the fact that the original concession value assigned to the Tijuana International Airport was
proportionately higher.

Operating income for the Guadalajara airport increased by 15.5% or Ps. 141.8 million, from Ps.
915.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 1,056.8 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues of Ps. 135.4 million. Additionally, operating costs decreased Ps. 2.2 million and depreciation and
amortization decreased Ps. 4.1 million. The operating margin increased 56 basis points, from 54.0% to 54.6% (operating margin increased 368 basis points from 58.6% to 62.3%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues
only).



109



---

##### Table of Contents

Operating income for the Tijuana airport increased by 34.4% or Ps. 83.1 million, from Ps.
241.6 million in 2012 to Ps. 324.7 million in 2013, primarily due to a slightly greater increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues as a result of an increase in passenger traffic then the corresponding increase in operating
costs. The operating margin increased 972 basis points from 37.2% to 46.9% (operating margin increased 729 basis points to 40.3% from 47.6%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Los Cabos airport increased by 8.2% or Ps. 39.9 million, from Ps. 487.3 million in 2012 to Ps.
527.2 million in 2013, primarily due to the increases in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 587 basis points from 49.4% to 55.3% (operating margin decreased 390 basis points to 60.0% from 56.1%, taking
into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Puerto Vallarta airport increased by
2.0% or Ps. 6.0 million, from Ps. 298.3 million in 2012 to Ps. 304.3 million in 2013, mainly due to an increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues as a result of the increase in passenger traffic greater than the
corresponding increase in operating costs. The operating margin increased 411 basis points from 42.7% to 46.8% (operating margin decreased 27 basis points to 48.8% from 48.6%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues
only).

Operating income for the Hermosillo airport increased by 26.2% or Ps. 17.9 million, from Ps. 68.3 million in 2012 to Ps.
86.2 million in 2013, primarily due to an increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 804 basis points from 32.2% to 40.3% (operating margin increased 620 basis points from 34.1% to 40.3%, taking
into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Guanajuato airport increased by 11.1%
or Ps. 8.2 million, from Ps. 74.0 million in 2012 to Ps. 82.2 million in 2013, primarily due to an increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 776 basis points from 31.2% to 38.9%
(operating margin increased 174 basis points from 38.6% to 40.3% taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for our 6 other airports increased by 78.5% or Ps. 9.5 million, from Ps. 12.1 million in 2012 to Ps.
21.6 million in 2013. The change in operating income was primarily due to a higher percentage increase in the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues as compared to our fixed costs.

Finance income (cost)

Our finance
cost decreased by Ps. 37.2 million in 2013 with respect to 2012, from an expense of Ps. 14.0 million in 2012 to an expense of Ps. 51.2 million in 2013. Interest income went from income of Ps. 0.8 million in 2012 to an expense of
Ps. 54.9 million in 2013, which represented a net change of Ps. 55.7 million, due to: (i) a decrease of Ps. 21.3 million in the capitalization of interest on bank loans in 2013, (ii) a Ps. 30.8 million decrease in the
price of Pemex bonds, classified as Fair Value Through Profit or Loss (FVTPL) and (iii) a Ps. 3.6 million decrease in interest gains due to lower interest rates. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in the exchange rate loss
that went from a loss of Ps. 14.8 million in 2012 to a gain of Ps. 3.8 million in 2013, resulting in a net reduction of Ps. 18.6 million. This effect occurred due to the 0.4% devaluation of the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar during
2013, while during 2012, the Mexican peso appreciated 6.9%.



110



---

##### Table of Contents

Income Taxes

As compared with 2012, income taxes decreased Ps. 251.7 million, from Ps. 327.4 million in 2012 to Ps. 75.8 million in 2013.
Income taxes for 2013 principally consisted of the following: (i) current income tax expense for the year of Ps. 653.6 million, an increase of Ps. 101.8 million from 2012 to 2013 mainly due to a 10.6% increase in income before taxes,
which was offset by: (ii) a deferred income tax benefit of Ps. 577.8 million, due to an increase of Ps. 353.5 million in 2013 associated, primarily, with the 2014 Tax Reform effects regarding the tax rate change applied over our
concession and other acquired rights. Our effective tax rate decreased from 16% for 2012 to 3% in 2013, due primarily to changes in tax rates and the elimination of the IETU as a result of the 2014 Tax Reform.

Net Income

Net income increased
by 26.8% or Ps. 474.2 million, from Ps. 1.8 billion in 2012 to Ps. 2.2 billion in 2013, mainly due to the Ps. 259.7 million increase in operating income, and the Ps. 251.7 million decrease in income taxes. Our net margin increased
from 35.8% in 2012 to 43.0% in 2013 (net margin increased to 46.9% from 40.5%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011

Revenues

Total revenues for 2012
increased 0.1%, from Ps. 4,938.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 4,944.7 million in 2012, due to an increase of Ps. 288.0 million in aeronautical services revenues, an increase of Ps. 183.9 million in non-aeronautical services revenues.
This was partially offset by a Ps. 466.0 million decrease in revenues from improvements to concession assets as a result of the committed investments outlined in our Master Development Programs, which for 2012 were less than the corresponding
amounts in 2011.

Aeronautical services revenues increased 9.4%, from Ps. 3,077.9 million in 2011 to Ps. 3,365.9 million in
2012, primarily due to a 5.3% increase in passenger traffic compared to 2011, a 0.9% increase in the Mexican Producer Price Index excluding petroleum and a 5.5% increase in specific tariffs as of June 2012. Revenues from passenger charges increased
10.4% or Ps. 266.4 million primarily driven by a 5.4% increase in passengers that paid passenger charges and the increase in specific tariffs as of June 2012. During 2012, revenues from aircraft landing and parking fees increased 7.5%, or Ps.
22.8 million, while the leasing of spaces to airlines for ticket counter and back office space and complementary services decreased 2.0%, or Ps. 3.2 million.

Non-aeronautical services revenues for 2012 increased Ps. 183.9 million, or 22.3%, from Ps. 824.6 million in 2011 to Ps.
1,008.5 million in 2012. The primary factor influencing the change in non-aeronautical revenues from 2011 to 2012 was a combined Ps. 118.3 million increase in our duty-free operations, recovery of costs revenues, car parking and
advertising revenues. The increase in duty-free operations revenue was mainly due to the opening of the new Terminal 2 in the Los Cabos airport, where a new duty-free contract was entered into, which included a one-time payment of Ps.
26.6 million (which under the contract cannot be returned to the tenant under any circumstances) as well as higher rents than those paid by the previous tenant. The increase in revenues is related to the operation of the baggage screening
systems which began in the fourth quarter of 2011. The increase in car parking is due to the increase in passenger traffic as well as the new parking fee structure implemented at the beginning of 2012. The increase in advertising is the result of
the fact that since May 2011 we have been directly operating the advertising at all of our airports. Additionally, during 2012, our leasing of space to time share developers, food and beverages, car rentals and VIP lounges (lounges operated directly
by us) contributed a combined increase of Ps. 49.2 million as compared to 2011.



111



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenues from improvements to concession assets in 2012 decreased Ps. 466.0 million, or
45.0%, from Ps. 1,036.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 570.2 million in 2012. The main factor that determines the change in revenues from improvements to concession assets from 2011 to 2012 was a decrease in our commitments under the Master
Development Programs for 2012, mainly due to the completion of construction of: (i) the new terminal at the Los Cabos airport, (ii) the expansion of the main terminal at the Tijuana airport, (iii) the construction of the overhanging
cover at the Guadalajara airport and (iv) the expansion of the satellite building at the Puerto Vallarta airport.

Revenues by Airport

Total revenues at each of our airports increased, mainly due to the increase in aeronautical services revenues.

At the Guadalajara airport, revenues increased by 4.6% or Ps. 75.2 million, from Ps. 1,618.1 million in 2011 to Ps.
1,693.3 million in 2012. Aeronautical revenues increased 7.1% or Ps. 80.7 million, from Ps. 1,141.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 1,221.9 million in 2012, due to a Ps. 81.1 million or 7.1% increase in passenger charges caused by a
3.3% increase in passenger traffic and a 5.5% increase in tariffs due to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues, at the Guadalajara airport, increased 18.1% or Ps. 52.0 million, from Ps. 287.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 339.2 million in
2012, due principally to an increase of Ps. 44.2 million in car parking, advertising, VIP lounges, recovery of costs and other commercial revenues. The increase was partially offset by a Ps. 57.6 million decrease in revenues from
improvements to concession assets (revenues increased 9.3% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services).

At the Tijuana airport, revenues decreased by 5.4% or Ps. 37.0, from Ps. 686.6 million in 2011 to Ps. 649.6 million in 2012, mainly
due to a Ps. 107.5 million decrease in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased 13.3% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 11.3% or Ps.
49.4 million, from Ps. 437.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 486.7 million in 2012 at the Tijuana airport, due to an increase in passenger charges of Ps. 45.4 million. Non-aeronautical revenues increased at the Tijuana airport by 23.0% or Ps.
21.2 million, from Ps. 92.0 million in 2011 to Ps. 113.2 million in 2012, principally due to a Ps. 16.5 million increase in revenues from car parking, recovery of costs and advertising.

At the Los Cabos airport, revenues decreased by 5.5% or Ps. 56.9 million, from Ps. 1,042.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 985.8 million
in 2012, mainly due to a decrease of Ps. 192.3 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased 20.0% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues
increased by 12.0% or Ps. 58.2 million, from Ps. 485.1 million in 2011 to Ps. 543.3 million in 2012 at the Los Cabos airport, due to a 7.5% increase in passenger and the 5.5% increase in tariffs due to inflation. Non-aeronautical
revenues increased at the Los Cabos airport by 40.4% or Ps. 77.2 million, from Ps. 191.4 million in 2011 to Ps. 268.6 million in 2012, mainly due to a Ps. 58.1 million increase in revenues from duty-free operations, recovery of
costs and leasing of spaces to time-share developers.

At the Puerto Vallarta airport, revenues decreased by 9.6% or Ps.
73.9 million, from Ps. 773.4 million in 2011 to Ps. 699.5 million in 2012, mainly due to a decrease of Ps. 119.1 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets (revenues increased by 8.0% taking into account only
revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 6.6% or Ps. 27.8 million, from Ps. 423.8 million in 2011 to Ps. 451.6 million in 2012 at the Puerto Vallarta airport, due to a 2.4% increase
in passenger traffic and a 5.5% increase in tariffs due to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues increased at the Puerto Vallarta airport by 12.3% or Ps. 17.5 million, from Ps. 142.3 million in 2011 to Ps. 159.8 million in 2012, due
principally to a Ps. 10.7 million increases in recovery of costs, revenues from duty-free operations and advertising.



112



---

##### Table of Contents

At the Hermosillo airport, revenues increased by 1.1% or Ps. 2.4 million, from Ps.
209.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 212.1 million in 2012 primarily due to an increase in aeronautical revenues resulting from a 7.3% increase in passenger traffic and a 5.5% increase in tariffs related to inflation (revenues increased 14.0%
taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 12.5% or Ps. 18.8 million, from Ps. 149.9 million in 2011 to Ps. 168.7 million in 2012 at the Hermosillo airport.
Non-aeronautical revenues increased by 22.1% or Ps. 5.8 million, from Ps. 26.0 million in 2011 to Ps. 31.8 million in 2012, due to a Ps. 3.5 million increase in revenues from car parking, advertising and car rentals. The increase
in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues was partially offset by a decrease of Ps. 22.2 million in revenues from improvements to concession assets in 2012 as compared to 2011.

At the Guanajuato airport, revenues increased by 12.4% or Ps. 26.3 million, from Ps. 210.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 237.0 million
in 2012, mainly due to an increase of Ps. 20.8 million in aeronautical revenues (revenues increased 14.8% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues increased by 15.3% from Ps.
135.9 million in 2011 to Ps. 156.8 million in 2012 at the Guanajuato airport, mainly due to an 11.3% increase in passenger traffic and a 5.5% increase in tariffs related to inflation. Non-aeronautical revenues increased at the Guanajuato
airport by 12.7% or Ps. 3.9 million, from Ps. 31.1 million in 2011 to Ps. 35.0 million in 2012, due primarily to a Ps. 3.9 million increase in revenues from car parking, recovery of costs and advertising. Revenues from
improvements to concession assets increased 3.4% or Ps. 1.5 million from Ps. 43.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 45.2 million in 2012.

Revenues at our other 6 airports increased by 17.6% or Ps. 69.9 million, on an aggregate basis from Ps. 397.5 million in 2011 to Ps.
467.4 million in 2012, largely due to a Ps. 32.3 million increase in aeronautical revenues (revenues increased 10.7% taking into account only revenues from aeronautical and non-aeronautical services). Aeronautical revenues at these
airports increased by 10.6% or Ps. 32.3 million, from Ps. 304.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 337.0 million in 2012, mainly due to a 6.1% increase in passenger traffic and a 5.5% increase in tariffs due to inflation. Non-aeronautical
revenues increased by 11.5% or Ps. 6.3 million, from Ps. 54.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 61.0 million in 2012, due primarily to a Ps. 6.4 million increase in revenues from car parking, advertising, recovery of costs, and other
commercial revenues. Revenues from improvements to concession assets increased 82.2% or Ps. 31.4 million from Ps. 38.1 million in 2011 to Ps. 69.5 million in 2012.

Total Costs

Cost of Services

Cost of services, which is comprised of employee costs, maintenance, safety, security, insurance, utilities and other expenses, increased by
Ps. 73.1 million, or 7.4%, from Ps. 986.9 million in 2011 to Ps. 1.0 billion in 2012. Safety, security and insurance expenses increased 21.5%, or Ps. 28.2 million, due to the outsourcing of certain of our check-point staff, the
increase in implementation of additional security measures required by airport authorities related to checking for liquids carried by boarding passengers and outsourcing to a third party to operate the new baggage screening system equipment at our
airports. Employee costs increased 5.4%, or Ps. 20.8 million, mainly due to severance payments of Ps. 14.4 million related to the personnel responsible for operating our airbuses and walkways, because beginning on November 1, 2012 we
outsourced the entire operation to a third party, which assumed full responsibility. In addition, increases in salaries, annual incentives, labor union fees and other employee costs together amounted to Ps. 7.0 million. Maintenance expenses
increased 11.4% or Ps. 20.6 million mainly due to



113



---

##### Table of Contents

routine maintenance on runways, security equipment, machinery and equipment, in addition to major maintenance undertaken in certain operational areas. Utility expenses increased 14.2%, or Ps.
17.4 million, mainly due to an increase in electricity rates and higher consumption of electricity as a result of the expansion of our terminals, the operation of new baggage screening system equipment, in part related with the fulfillment of
our Master Developments Programs during 2012.

The main airports that contributed to the increase in the cost of services for 2012 were
Guadalajara (cost of services increased 9.7%, to Ps. 272.7 million in 2012 from Ps. 248.5 million in 2011, as a result of an increase in advertising commissions of Ps. 4.9 million, an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts of
Ps. 4.0 million and an increase in security and insurance Ps. 7.2 million), Los Cabos (cost of services increased 17.6%, to Ps. 149.4 million in 2012 from Ps. 127.1 million in 2011, as a result of the increase in electricity
consumption due to the operation of new Terminal building), and Tijuana (cost of services increased 14.1%, to Ps. 169.4 million in 2012 from Ps. 148.5 million in 2011, as a result of increases in security costs of Ps. 5.9 million,
maintenance expenses of Ps. 5.3 million, the provision for doubtful accounts of Ps. 4.4 million and an increase in electricity consumption of Ps. 3.0 million).

Technical Assistance Fee and Concession Tax

The technical assistance fee increased 13.9%, or Ps. 18.9 million, from Ps. 136.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 155.1 million in 2012.
This increase was mainly due to an increase in our consolidated income from operations, which is used to calculate this fee. See Item 4,Information on the Company  History and Development of the Company  Investment by
AMP.

As a result of increased revenues (excluding revenues from improvements to concession assets as they do not form part of
income for purposes of the government concession tax), government concession taxes increased 12.1%, from Ps. 193.8 million in 2011 to Ps. 217.3 million in 2012.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization increased 11.3% or Ps. 84.2 million, from Ps. 743.0 million in 2011 to Ps. 827.2 million in 2012,
mainly due to the growth in infrastructure resulting from our fulfillment of our Master Development Programs and our commitment to provide better services to our clients. The amortization of concessions did not fluctuate materially.

Cost of improvements to concession assets

Cost of improvements to concession assets in 2012 decreased Ps. 466.0 million, or 45.0%, from Ps. 1.0 billion in 2011 to Ps.
570.2 million in 2012. The primary factor influencing the decrease in cost of improvements to concession assets from 2011 to 2012 was the change in amounts allocated in our Master Development Programs for 2012 as compared to 2011.

Operating Costs by Airport

Operating
costs at most of our airports decreased, mainly due to the 45.0% decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets described above.

Operating costs for the Guadalajara airport were Ps. 778.3 million in 2012, a 0.9% or Ps. 7.2 million increased from the Ps.
771.1 million recorded in 2011. This increase was primarily due to a 14.4% or Ps. 30.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization, from Ps. 210.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 240.5 million in 2012. Additionally the cost of
maintenance, security, professional services and utilities increased 34.4% or Ps. 16.6 million. The increase in operating costs was partially offset by a Ps. 57.6 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps.
189.8 million in 2011 to Ps. 132.2 million in 2012 (operating costs increased 11.2% or Ps. 64.8 million, without including improvements to concession assets).



114



---

##### Table of Contents

Operating costs for the Tijuana airport decreased Ps. 66.5 million or 14.0%, to Ps.
408.0 million in 2012 from the Ps. 474.5 million recorded in 2011. This decrease was due to a 68.4% or Ps. 107.5 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 157.3 million in 2011 to Ps.
49.8 million in 2012. The decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 20.9 million increase in the cost of services and a Ps. 13.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization (operating costs increased 13.0% or Ps. 41.1 million,
without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Los Cabos airport decreased 21.8% or Ps.
139.0 million, to Ps. 498.5 million in 2012 from the Ps. 637.5 million recorded in 2011. This decrease was mainly due to a 52.5% or Ps. 192.3 million decrease in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps.
366.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 173.9 million in 2012. This decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 22.3 million increase in the cost of services and a Ps. 22.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization (operating costs
increased 19.6% or Ps. 53.3 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Puerto Vallarta
airport were Ps. 401.1 million in 2012, a 19.4% or Ps. 96.3 million decrease from the Ps. 497.4 million recorded in 2011. This decrease was primarily due to a 57.5% or Ps. 119.2 million decrease in the cost of improvements to
concession assets from Ps. 207.3 million in 2011 to Ps. 88.1 million in 2012. The decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 14.0 million increase in the cost of services and a Ps. 7.1 million increase in depreciation and
amortization (operating costs increased 7.9% or Ps. 22.8 million without including of improvements to concession assets).

Operating
costs for the Hermosillo airport decreased 1.8% or Ps. 2.7 million, to Ps. 143.8 million in 2012 from the Ps. 146.5 million recorded in 2011. This decrease was due to a 65.7% or Ps. 22.2 million decrease in the cost of
improvements to concession assets from Ps. 33.8 million in 2011 to Ps. 11.6 million in 2012. This decrease was partially offset by a Ps. 11.7 million increase in the cost of services and a Ps. 4.9 million increase in depreciation
and amortization (operating costs increased 17.3% or Ps. 19.5 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for the Guanajuato airport increased 6.9% or Ps. 10.5 million, from the Ps. 152.5 million recorded in 2011 to Ps.
163.0 million in 2012. This increase was primarily due to a 3.4% or Ps. 1.5 million increase in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 43.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 45.2 million in 2012. Additionally the cost of
services increased Ps. 5.4 million and depreciation and amortization increased Ps. 1.7 million (operating costs increased 8.3% or Ps. 9.0 million without including improvements to concession assets).

Operating costs for our 6 other airports increased 13.6% or Ps. 54.4 million, from the Ps. 400.9 million recorded in 2011 to Ps.
455.3 million in 2012. This increase was primarily due to a 82.2% or Ps. 31.3 million increase in the cost of improvements to concession assets from Ps. 38.1 million in 2011 to Ps. 69.5 million in 2012 (operating costs increased
6.4% or Ps. 23.1 million without including improvements to concession assets). Additionally, the cost of services increased Ps. 14.3 million and depreciation and amortization increased Ps. 4.1 million.

Income from Operations

Operating
income increased 15.1%, or Ps. 277.5 million, from Ps. 1.8 billion in 2011 to Ps. 2.1 billion in 2012. This increase was due to higher revenue in 2012, which was partially offset by increases in expenses. Our operating margin increased 557
basis points, from 37.2% in 2011 to 42.7% in 2012 (taking into account only the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues, the operating margin increased 130 basis points from 47.0% to 48.3% in 2012).



115



---

##### Table of Contents

Income from Operations by Airport

Operating margin is calculated by dividing income from operations at each airport by total revenues for that airport.

Operating income for the Guadalajara airport increased by 8.0% or Ps. 67.9 million, from Ps. 847.1 million in 2011 to Ps.
915.0 million in 2012, mainly due to an increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues of Ps. 132.8 million. This increase was partially offset by an increase in the costs of operations of Ps. 37.5 million and an increase in
depreciation and amortization of Ps. 30.4 million. The operating margin increased 169 basis points, from 52.3% to 54.0% (operating margin decreased 69 basis points from 59.3% to 58.6%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical
revenues only).

Operating income for the Tijuana airport increased by 13.9% or Ps. 29.5 million, from Ps. 212.1 million in 2011
to Ps. 241.6 million in 2012, primarily due to a slightly greater increase in aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues as a result of an increase in passenger traffic then the corresponding increase in operating costs. The operating margin
increased 630 basis points from 30.9% to 37.2% (operating margin increased 20 basis points to 40.1% from 40.3%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Puerto Vallarta airport increased by 8.1% or Ps. 22.4 million, from Ps. 276.0 million in 2011 to Ps.
298.4 million in 2012, primarily due to a slightly greater increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues as a result of the increase in passenger traffic then the corresponding increase in operating costs. The operating margin
increased 697 basis points from 35.7% to 42.7% (operating margin increased 5 basis points to 48.75% from 48.80%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Los Cabos airport increased by 20.3% or Ps. 82.1 million, from Ps. 405.2 million in 2011 to Ps.
487.3 million in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 1,057 basis points from 38.9% to 49.4% (operating margin increased 12 basis points to 59.9% from 60.0%, taking
into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Hermosillo airport increased by 8.1%
or Ps. 5.1 million, from Ps. 63.2 million in 2011 to Ps. 68.3 million in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 207 basis points from 30.1% to 32.2%
(operating margin decreased 186 basis points from 35.9% to 34.1%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for the Guanajuato airport increased by 27.1% or Ps. 15.8 million, from Ps. 58.2 million in 2011 to Ps.
74.0 million in 2012, primarily due to an increase in the aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues. The operating margin increased 359 basis points from 27.6% to 31.2% (operating margin increased 372 basis points from 34.9% to 38.6% taking
into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Operating income for our 6 other airports increased by 454.5%
or Ps. 15.5 million, to a gain of Ps. 12.1 million in 2012 from a loss of Ps. 3.4 million in 2011. The change in operating income was primarily due to a higher percentage increase in the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical
revenues as compared to our fixed costs.



116



---

##### Table of Contents

Finance income (cost)

The finance income (cost) experienced a negative variation of Ps. 51.3 million in 2012 with respect to 2011, from an income of Ps.
37.3 million in 2011 to an expense of Ps. 14.0 million in 2012. This decrease was mainly due to the impact of exchange rate variations, which went from a gain of Ps. 22.6 million in 2011 to a loss of Ps. 14.8 million in 2012,
resulting in a negative impact of Ps. 37.4 million. This decline occurred due to the 13.1% devaluation of the Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar during 2011, while during 2012, the Mexican peso appreciated 6.9%; additionally, the Company held a
larger dollar position. Furthermore, interest income declined from Ps. 14.7 million in 2011 to Ps. 0.8 million in 2012, due to a decline in interest capitalization for qualifying assets as a result of a decrease in committed investments in
2012 compared to 2011.

Income Taxes

Income taxes for 2012 were Ps. 327.4 million, which principally consisted of the following: (i) current income tax expense for the
year of Ps. 551.8 million; it was partially offset with deferred income tax derived from the concession value, other assets and tax loss carryforwards of Ps. 208.2 million and (ii) an increase in the recoverable asset tax of Ps.
16.1 million, stemming from revised financial projections at certain of our airports. Our effective tax rate increased from 14% for 2011 to 16% in 2012. As compared with 2011, income taxes increased Ps. 65.7 million, from Ps.
261.8 million in 2011 to Ps. 327.4 million in 2012. Additionally, current income tax increased Ps. 71.2 million from 2011 to 2012 mainly due to the 12.1% increase in income before taxes.

Net Income

Net income increased
by 10.0% or Ps. 160.4 million, from Ps. 1.6 billion in 2011 to Ps. 1.8 billion in 2012, mainly due to the Ps. 277.5 million increase in operating income, and partially offset by the Ps. 51.3 million negative variation in finance
income (cost). Our net margin increased from 32.6% in 2011 to 35.8% in 2012 (net margin decreased to 40.5% from 41.3%, taking into account the sum of aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues only).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, our operations had been funded through cash flow from operations, and we did not incur any significant indebtedness until 2007.
The cash flow generated from our operations has generally been used to fund operating costs and capital expenditures, including expenditures under our Master Development Programs, and the excess of our cash flow has been added to our accumulated
cash balances. In addition, in 2011, 2012 and 2013, we used Ps. 1.0 billion, Ps. 1.1 billion and Ps. 1.2 billion, respectively, of our cash balances for the payment of dividends.

At December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, we had Ps. 2.1 billion, Ps. 1.7 billion and Ps. 2.2 billion of cash and cash equivalents, and Ps.
278.3 million, Ps. 433.6 million and Ps. 410.4 million of financial investments held for trading purposes, respectively. In 2013 we obtained new funds through a bank loan of Ps. 488.2 million for use in connection with our
capital expenditures in 2013. We believe our working capital and resources expected to be generated from operations, in conjunction with the proceeds from our credit agreements, will continue to meet our present operating requirements.

Cash Flows

In 2013, we generated Ps. 3.0
billion from operating activities, principally reflecting income from operations after taking into consideration the effect of our non-monetary assets, such as depreciation and amortization. Income generated from operations was mainly used to make:
(i) dividend payments of Ps. 907.5 million on April 25, 2013 and Ps. 302.5 million on November 27, 2013, (ii) capital expenditures of approximately Ps. 192.7 million in machinery, equipment and improvements to our
airport facilities, and (iii) share repurchases of approximately Ps. 276.7 million in shares.



117



---

##### Table of Contents

In 2012, we generated Ps. 2.7 billion from operating activities, principally reflecting income
from operations after taking into consideration the effect of our non-monetary assets, such as depreciation and amortization. Income generated from operations was mainly used to make: (i) dividend payments of Ps. 847.5 million on
May 31, 2012 and Ps. 282.5 million on November 1, 2012, (ii) a capital reduction of Ps. 870.0 million, and (iii) capital expenditures of approximately Ps. 193.3 million in machinery, equipment and improvements to
our airport facilities.

In 2011, we generated Ps. 2.3 billion from operating activities, principally reflecting income from operations
after taking into consideration the effect of our non-monetary assets, such as depreciation and amortization. Income generated from operations was mainly used to make: (i) dividend payments of Ps. 780.0 million on May 31, 2011 and
Ps. 255.1 million on November 29, 2011, (ii) capital expenditures of approximately Ps. 238.8 million in machinery, equipment and improvements to our airport facilities, and (iii) a repurchase of Ps. 777.5 million in
shares.

Indebtedness

On
December 9, 2009, our Guanajuato, Guadalajara, Hermosillo and Puerto Vallarta airports entered into unsecured credit agreements with cross guarantees provided by the individual airports with Banamex and HSBC for Ps. 325.7 million from each
institution, for a total of Ps. 651.4 million. The loans accrue interest at a variable TIIE rate plus 350 basis points, with principal and interest to be paid quarterly for a period of seven years. Under these contracts with both banks, the airports
have to comply with the following covenants, among others: (i) limitation on the use of proceeds for the financing of capital expenditures and working capital, (ii) do not constitute, assume or permit that any obligation exist on any of
its goods (iii) restrictions on the incurrence of other debt by any subsidiary of each airport receiving disbursements, if any, (iv) prohibition on the merger of the airport receiving the disbursement (or any of its subsidiaries) with any
other company, (v) prohibition on the sale or transfer of assets from each airport receiving a disbursement in an amount greater than Ps. 1.0 million, unless the sale occurs in the regular course of business, (vi) maintenance of
certain financial ratios and (vii) prohibition of dividends or reimbursement of capital if the airports are unable to fulfill their obligations under the credit agreement.

The fair value of our hedging derivative financial instrument was an asset of Ps. 4.5 million as of December 31, 2011, of Ps.
1.0 million as of December 31, 2012 and of Ps. 0.3 million as of December 31, 2013.

In connection with the loans
entered into on December 9, 2009, each of those airports entered into a cash flow hedge with Banamex to hedge interest rate risk, which sets a ceiling of 7% on the TIIE, stipulated in the loan agreements (representing the strike price of the
hedge), which when added to the 350 basis points established in the loan agreements and the related hedge agreement, results in an effective maximum interest rate of 10.50%. The effective date of the hedge begins in the fourth year of the related
debt agreement and extends to the end of the term of the debt. This hedge applies to both loans issued by Banamex and HSBC. On December 10, 2013, we made a prepayment of Ps. 61.6 million on both loans. Additionally, on February 4,
2014 we prepaid the outstanding balance of Ps. 217.6 million of the loans in full. Therefore, the hedge for the loans is no longer applicable or necessary.

On May 26, 2011, we entered into an additional line of credit for the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Hermosillo and Guanajuato
airports, to finance working capital and capital investments previously committed pursuant to our Master Development Programs at these airports for the years 2011 and 2012, for a total amount of Ps. 1.0 billion with HSBC, represented by unsecured
credit agreements



118



---

##### Table of Contents

with cross guarantees provided by the individual airports. The loans bear interest at the variable 28-day TIIE rate plus 165 basis points and require quarterly principal and interest payments
over a period of seven years. During 2011 and 2012, a total of Ps. 913.1 million was disbursed under the line of credit, the remaining Ps. 110.8 million was not disbursed.

On June 6, 2011, we entered into an additional line of credit for the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Hermosillo and Guanajuato
airports, to finance working capital and capital investments previously committed pursuant to our Master Development Programs at these airports for the years 2011 and 2012, for a total amount of Ps. 551.4 million with Banamex, represented by
unsecured credit agreements with cross guarantees provided by the individual airports. The loans bear interest at the variable 91-day TIIE rate plus 135 basis points for the 2011 disbursements and at the variable 91-day TIIE rate plus 143 basis
points for the 2012 disbursements. The loan requires quarterly principal and interest payments over a period of seven years from the date of the disbursement. Ps. 355.1 million in funds from this line were disbursed on different dates during
2011. The remaining Ps. 196.3 million was to be disbursed during 2012. However, on March 16, 2012, Banamex notified the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports that based on article 294 of Mexicos
Negotiable Instruments and Credit Operations Law (Ley General de Títulos y Operaciones de Crédito) and pursuant to clause XXIV of the credit agreement entered into with these airports, Banamex would not make any future
disbursements outlined in clause V of the credit agreement. On November 7, 2012, the Company notified Banamex that the remaining balance of the loan would be prepaid. Ps. 77.9 million of the remaining balance was prepaid on
December 7, 2012 and Ps. 105.3 million was prepaid on December 23, 2012. A final payment was made on January 11, 2013 for Ps.104.6 million, for a total of Ps. 287.8 million; thereby repaying the loan balance in full. With these
payments the loans were completely liquidated. This prepayment was financed by a new loan from BBVA Bancomer for the Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports for Ps. 287.8 million, which was contracted on
November 23, 2012 and which bears interest at the variable 91-day TIIE rate plus 120 basis points and requires quarterly principal and interest payments for a period of seven years. This is an unsecured credit agreement with crossed guarantees
between the airports receiving the credit.

On April, 2013, we entered into an additional loan for the Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Los
Cabos, Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports for Ps. 459.4 million, which bears interest at the variable 91-day TIIE rate plus 133 basis points and requires quarterly principal and interest payments for a period of seven years. This is an
unsecured credit agreement with cross guarantees between the airports receiving the credit. During 2013, a total of Ps. 305.4 million was disbursed under the line of credit; the remaining Ps. 154.0 million will be disbursed during 2014.

As of December 31, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants stipulated by these credit agreements.

Capital Expenditures

Under the terms of
our concessions, each of our subsidiary concession holders is required to present a Master Development Program for approval by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation every five years. Each Master Development Program includes investment
commitments (including capital expenditures and improvements) applicable to us as the concession holder for the succeeding five-year period. Once approved by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, these commitments become binding
obligations under the terms of our concessions.

In December 2009, the Ministry of Communications and Transportation approved our
Master Development Programs for each of our airports for the 2010 to 2014 period. This 5-year program will be in effect from January 1, 2010 until December 31, 2014.



119



---

##### Table of Contents

The table below sets forth our historical capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are
calculated on a cash flow basis, meaning that capital expenditures are equal to those investments actually paid for by each airport during a given year and not including investments allocated for by the airport during that year but not paid for
during the given year. The investments shown in the table below therefore reflect our expenditures actually paid for by our airports for the years indicated. In order to be compared with our committed investments for a given year, the investments
made in the previous year but paid for in the given year need to be subtracted while the investments allocated but not paid for in the given year need to be added. For the 2011, 2012 and 2013, the total of our investments allocated but unpaid were
Ps. 276.4 million, Ps. 163.6 million and Ps. 135.4 million, respectively.

Capital Expenditures



|                        |  |                         |           | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- | 
|Year ended December 31, |  | (thousands of pesos)(1) |          
|2013                    |  | Ps.                     | 686,270   | 
|2012                    |  |                         | 979,014   | 
|2011                    |  |                         | 1,255,036 | 



|(1) | Expressed in nominal pesos.
|--- | ---------------------------

In 2013, we spent Ps. 686.3 million on capital expenditures,
principally for expansion and remodeling of terminal buildings and improvements to runways and aprons at the Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Tijuana, La Paz and Manzanillo airports. In 2012, we spent Ps. 979.0 million on capital expenditures,
principally for terminals, and runways and aprons. In 2011, we spent Ps. 1.3 billion on capital expenditures, principally for terminals, equipment for the inspection of checked baggage, runways and aprons. On December 15, 2011, we established
two trusts to set aside the financing needs for the expansion of the main terminal at our Tijuana airport and for the new Terminal 2 at our Los Cabos airport, respectively. The funds set aside in these trusts were used exclusively to make payments
for work on each of the projects; as of December 31, 2013, the related expansion projects at the Tijuana and Los Cabos airports were concluded and as a result, the funds were released. See Item 4, History and Development of the Company
 Master Development Programs for more detail on our historical capital expenditures.

During 2011, 2012 and 2013, 38.1%,
19.7% and 17.3%, respectively, of our capital expenditures were funded by cash flows from operations, while the remaining balance was funded with bank loans. We currently intend to fund the investments and working capital required by our business
strategy through cash flows from operations and from the indebtedness described above.

Share Repurchase Program

At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved for a
maximum amount of Ps. 640 million for the twelve months following April 24, 2013. From September 2013 to February 2014, we purchased 5,345,053 shares at an average price of Ps. 67.66 for Ps. 359.3 million. These shares represent 0.9% of
our total outstanding shares. At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2012, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved for a maximum amount of Ps. 280.0 million for the twelve months following
April 16, 2012. No shares, however, were repurchased during 2012. At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 27, 2011, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved for a maximum amount of Ps. 473.5
million for the twelve months following April 27, 2011. During that period we purchased 10,061,800 shares at an average price of Ps. 47.06 for Ps. 473.5 million. These shares represent 1.8% of our total outstanding shares. At the General
Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held July 22-25, 2010, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved under the Mexican Securities Law rules, for a maximum amount of Ps. 1.0 billion from July 25, 2010 to April 27,
2011. During that period we purchased 20,217,600 shares at an average price of Ps. 45.20 for Ps. 913.8 million. These shares represent 3.6% of our total outstanding shares. In the aggregate, as of December 31, 2013, we held 34,406,892 shares in
our treasury worth approximately Ps. 1.7 billion, at an average price of Ps. 48.36 per share; as of March 31, 2014, we held 35,624,453 shares, at an average price of Ps. 49.03 per share.



120



---

##### Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our audited consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS.

We base our estimates and judgments on our historical experience, on technical merits for tax positions, on financial projections and on
various other reasonable factors that together form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and liabilities. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We evaluate our
estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2.g to our audited consolidated financial statements.

We believe our most critical accounting policies that result in the application of estimates and/or judgments are the following:

Contingencies and Provisions

We are a
party to a number of legal proceedings. Under IFRS, liabilities are recognized in the financial statements when a loss is both estimable and probable. If the loss is neither probable nor estimable or if the likelihood of a loss is remote, no amounts
are recognized in the financial statements.

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We systematically and periodically review the aging and collection of our accounts receivable and record an allowance for doubtful accounts
when evidence exists that they will not be fully recoverable. We believe such risk is adequately covered by guarantee deposits in cash or other kind of guarantees by clients.

Income Taxes

In conformity with
IFRS, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. At year-end for 2011, 2012 and 2013, we recorded, within the deferred
income tax asset, an estimated amount of recoverable asset tax paid Ps. 345.0 million, Ps. 335.3 million and Ps. 291.7 million, respectively, based on financial projections that show that we will recover the excess of asset tax over
income tax relating to our Guanajuato, Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta and Tijuana airports. As a result of changes in Mexican tax law (see Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Taxation), the asset tax balance
may be recovered through rebates of up to 10% of the total asset tax paid out and pending recovery over the next ten years (starting in 2008), provided that this sum does not exceed the difference between the income tax paid during the period and
the asset tax paid during the years 2007, 2006 and 2005, whichever is lower, whenever the income tax exceeds asset tax in any of those years. Additionally, we have recorded a tax loss carryforward, expiring on 2048 as permitted by the Mexican tax
authorities for concession operation relating to our Aguascalientes and Morelia airports, and for GAP itself, which has ten years to apply its tax loss. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable
income, projected future taxable income and related income tax expense compared to future estimated asset tax and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the
future, we may be required to make additional adjustments to our deferred tax assets, which may result in a reduction of, or an increase in, income tax expense. Based on our financial projections, up to December 31, 2013, we



121



---

##### Table of Contents

recognize deferred income taxes based on that expectation. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, we reduced the recoverable income taxes paid on dividends for a total amount of Ps. 0.6 million, Ps.
0.2 million and Ps. 0.5 million, respectively, as we did not believe we would recover those amounts in future years. Every year we review the amount of income taxes paid on dividends according to our financial projections and determine the
amount that could be recovered.

Impairment in the Value of Long-Lived Assets

We must test for impairment when indicators of potential impairment in the carrying amount of tangible and intangible long-lived assets in use
exist, unless there is conclusive evidence that the indicators of impairment are temporary. An impairment is recorded when the carrying amount of long-lived assets exceeds the greater of the present value of future net cash flows provided by the
assets or the net sales price upon disposal. Present value of future net cash flows is based on managements projections of future operations, discounted using current interest rates. Our evaluations throughout the year and up to the date of
this filing did not reveal any impairment of tangible and intangible long-lived assets. We can give no assurance that our evaluations will not change as a result of new information or developments which may change our future projections of net cash
flows or the related discount rates and result in future impairment charges.

Accounting for the Concession

We believe we have carried out a comprehensive implementation of the standards applicable to the accounting treatment of our concession and
have determined that, among others IFRIC 12 is applicable to us. We treat our investments related to improvements and upgrades to be performed in connection with our Master Development Programs under the intangible asset model established by IFRIC
12 and do not recognize a provision for maintenance, as all investments required by the Master Development Programs, regardless of their nature, directly increase the maximum tariff per traffic unit. Accordingly, all amounts invested under the
Master Development Programs have a direct correlation to the amount of fees we will be able to charge each passenger or cargo service provider, and thus, a direct correlation to the amount of revenues we will be able to generate. As a result, we
define all expenditures associated with investments required by the Master Development Programs as revenue generating activities given that they ultimately provide future benefits, whereby subsequent improvements and upgrades made to the concession
are recognized as intangible assets based on the principles of IFRIC 12. Additionally, compliance with the committed investments per the Master Development Programs is mandatory, as well as the fulfillment of the maximum tariff and therefore, in
case of a failure to meet any one of these obligations (Master Development Program amounts or maximum tariff), we could be subject to sanctions and our concessions could be revoked. See Item 4,Regulatory Framework  General
Obligations of Concession Holders.

Depreciation and Amortization

In light of the nature of our business and our concessions, we make certain assumptions and professional judgments regarding recognition of
depreciation and amortization of our tangible and intangible assets. Depreciation of our tangible assets is calculated under the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful life and the depreciation
method are reviewed at the end of each year, and the effect of any changes in the estimate recorded is recognized on a prospective basis. To determine the amortization period of intangible assets, we focus either on the period over which they will
generate future economic benefits or the concession term, whichever is less. We believe that the decisions made are the most reasonable based on information available, on the judgments made and the way in which we manage our operations.



122



---

##### Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

New or revised International Financial Reporting Standards:



|                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |                 |                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | --------------- | 
|Standard                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | Effective as of |                
|Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10  Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 12  Disclosure of Interests
in Other Entities, and IAS 27  Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements) |  |                 | January 1, 2014 | 
|Amendments to IAS 32  Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities                                                                                                                      |  |                 | January 1, 2014 | 
|IFRIC 21  Levies                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                 | January 1, 2014 | 
|IFRS 9  Financial Instruments                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                 | January 1, 2017 | 
|Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7  Mandatory Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures                                                                                                   |  |                 | January 1, 2016 | 

Following is a summary of these standards; for a full description see Note 31 in our consolidated financial statements.

Investment Entities (Amendments to IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 12  Disclosure of Interests in
Other Entities, and IAS 27  Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements)

The amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 define an
investment entity and require a reporting entity that meets the definition of an investment entity not to consolidate its subsidiaries but instead to measure its subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in its consolidated and separate
financial statements.

To qualify as an investment entity, a reporting entity is required to:



| |  |  | Obtain funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing them with professional investment management services.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Commit to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment income, or both.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Measure and evaluate performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendments to IAS 32  Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The amendments to IAS 32 clarify the requirements relating to the offset of financial assets and financial liabilities. Specifically, the amendments clarify
the meaning of currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off and simultaneous realization and settlement.

IFRIC 21Levies

IFRIC 21 provides guidance on when to recognize a liability for a levy imposed by a government, both
for levies that are accounted for in accordance with IAS 37  Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and those for which the timing and amount of the levy is certain. The interpretation covers the accounting for
outflows imposed on entities by governments (including government agencies and similar bodies) in accordance with laws and/or regulations. However, it does not include income taxes (see IAS 12  Income Taxes), fines and other penalties,
liabilities arising from emissions trading schemes and outflows within the scope of other standards.

IFRIC 21 identifies the obligating event for the
recognition of a liability as the activity that triggers the payment of the levy in accordance with the relevant legislation. The interpretation clarifies that economic compulsion and the going concern principle do not create or imply that an
obligating event has occurred.



123



---

##### Table of Contents

IFRIC 21 provides the following guidance on recognition of a liability to pay levies:



| |  |  | The liability is recognized progressively if the obligating event occurs over a period of time.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | If an obligation is triggered on reaching a minimum threshold, the liability is recognized when that minimum threshold is reached.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, introduced new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. IFRS 9 was amended in October 2010 to
include requirements for the classification and measurement of financial liabilities and for derecognition.

Key requirements of IFRS 9 include the
following:



| |  |  | All recognized financial assets that are within the scope of IAS 39  Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are required to be subsequently measured at amortized cost or fair value.
Specifically, debt investments that are held within a business model whose objective is to collect the contractual cash flows, and that have contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding are
generally measured at amortized cost at the end of subsequent accounting periods. All other debt investments and equity investments are measured at their fair value at the end of subsequent accounting periods. In addition, under IFRS 9, entities may
make an irrevocable election to present subsequent changes in the fair value of an equity investment (that is not held for trading) in other profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with only dividend income generally recognized in profit or
loss of the year.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | With regard to the measurement of financial liabilities designated as of fair value through profit or loss, IFRS 9 requires that the amount of change in the fair value of the financial liability that is attributable to
changes in the credit risk of that liability is presented in other profit or loss and other comprehensive income, unless the recognition of the effects of changes in the liabilitys credit risk in other profit or loss and other comprehensive
income would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss. Changes in fair value attributable to a financial liabilitys credit risk are not subsequently reclassified to profit or loss. Under IAS 39, the entire amount of the
change in the fair value of the financial liability designated as fair value through profit or loss is presented in profit or loss.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the
date of this report, we have not fully assessed the effects of adopting these new standards and amendments on our consolidated financial information.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We are
not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013.



|                                   |  |                        |         |  |                    |     |         |          |  |    |          |  |  |                  |         |  |  |    |         | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------- |  | ------------------ | --- | ------- | -------- |  | -- | -------- |  |  | ---------------- | ------- |  |  | -- | ------- | 
|                                   |  | Payments due by period |        
|Contractual Obligations            |  | Total                  |         |  | Less than 1year(4) |     |         | 1-3years |  |    | 3-5years |  |  | More than5 years |        
|                                   |  | (in millions of pesos) |        
|Master Development Programs (1)(5) |  | Ps.                    | 253.7   |  |                    | Ps. | 253.7   |          |  |    | N/A      |  |  |                  | N/A     |  |  |    | N/A     | 
|Purchase Obligations (2)           |  |                        | 47.0    |  |                    |     | 47.0    |          |  |    | N/A      |  |  |                  | N/A     |  |  |    | N/A     | 
|Bank Loans                         |  |                        | 1,854.5 |  |                    |     | 637.6   |          |  |    | 560.2    |  |  |                  | 477.7   |  |  |    | 178.9   | 
|Interest from Bank Loans(6)        |  |                        | 248.8   |  |                    |     | 88.5    |          |  |    | 105.4    |  |  |                  | 47.4    |  |  |    | 7.5     | 
|Operating Lease Obligations (3)    |  |                        | 33.3    |  |                    |     | 9.0     |          |  |    | 16.9     |  |  |                  | 7.40    |  |  |    | N/A     | 
|                                   |  |                        |         |  |                    |     |         |          |  |    |          |  |  |                  |         |  |  |    |         | 
|Total                              |  | Ps.                    | 2,505.8 |  |                    | Ps. | 1,045.9 |          |  | Ps | . 740.9  |  |  | Ps               | . 532.6 |  |  | Ps | . 186.5 | 
|                                   |  |                        |         |  |                    |     |         |          |  |    |          |  |  |                  |         |  |  |    |         | 



124



---

##### Table of Contents



|(1) | Figures expressed in constant pesos as of December 31, 2007 based on the Mexican Producer Price Index, construction sector, materials, equipment rental and fees sector segment (Índice Nacional de Precios al
Productor, sector construcción, materiales, alquiler de maquinaria y remuneraciones).
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Reflects a minimum fixed annual payment of U.S.$ 4.0 million required to be paid under our technical assistance agreement. The agreement expires on August 25, 2014 (but is subject to automatic renewal for
another 5-year period), therefore the annual payment reflected only considers 8 months. For the peso calculation we assume an average exchange rate of Ps. 12.72 per U.S.$ 1.00 and an annual U.S. inflation rate of 1.5%. The amount ultimately to
be paid in any year will depend on our profitability.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes leasing of buildings and vehicles.
|--- | -------------------------------------------

|(4) | Amount for less than one year corresponds to obligations for 2013.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | In the fifth year of the Master Development Programs (2014), a negotiation will take place with the Ministry of Communications and Transportation to determine the new Master Development Program commitments for the
subsequent five-year period (2015-2019).
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(6) | For the interest calculations, we determined the interest payments using a fixed interest rate of 8.52% for the loans contracted in 2007, using an estimated rate of 8.37% for the loans contracted in 2009, an estimated
rate of 7.13% for the loans contracted in 2011, an estimated rate of 6.83% for loans contracted in 2012 and an estimated rate of 5.55% for loans contracted in 2013. See Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Liquidity and
Capital Resources  Indebtedness.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Item 6. | Directors, Senior Management and Employees
|------- | ------------------------------------------

Directors

The board of directors is responsible for the management of our business. Pursuant to our bylaws, our board of directors generally must consist
of 11 members. Under Mexican law, at least 25 percent of our directors must be independent (as determined by our shareholders at each annual general ordinary shareholders meeting applying the provisions of our bylaws and relevant Mexican and
other laws); under the Securities Market Law, the National Banking and Securities Commission may object to such designation of independence. Currently, our board of directors consists of 11 directors.

Our bylaws provide that the holders of Series BB shares are entitled to elect four members to the board of directors and their
alternates. Our remaining directors are elected by the holders of our Series B shares (who do not elect alternates). Under our bylaws, each shareholder or group of shareholders owning 10% of our capital stock in the form of Series B shares is
entitled to elect one member to the board of directors. Also our bylaws prevent any Series B shareholders, individually, or together with related parties, from appointing more than one board member, even if the shareholder owns more than 10% of our
outstanding capital stock (because any shares in excess of the 10% maximum do not have any voting rights under our bylaws). The other directors to be elected by the holders of our Series B shares are elected by majority vote of all holders of
Series B shares present at the shareholders meeting, except for those Series B shareholders that already participated in any 10% board member designation. Directors are elected for one-year terms at the ordinary shareholders
meeting.

At our April 16, 2013 General Shareholders Meeting, several changes were approved to the composition of our
board of directors, including the ratification of one new member. The composition of our board of directors as of the date of this report is set forth in the following table, which lists the title, date of appointment, age and alternate, as
applicable, of each of our current directors. In the past, certain of our shareholders have challenged the composition of our board of directors. For more information see Item 8, Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Grupo
México, S.A.B. de C.V. seeks to void certain resolutions adopted at our Corporate Shareholders Meetings.



125



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                         |  |                                      |  |                    |  |     |    |  |           |                             
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | --- | -- |  | --------- | ----------------------------
|Name                                     |  | Title                                |  | Director since     |  | Age |    |  | Alternate
|Eduardo Sánchez Navarro Redo*            |  | Chairman and Director (AMP)          |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 68 |  |           | José Vicente Corta Fernández
|Francisco Javier Marín San Andrés        |  | Director (AMP)                       |  | August 1, 2001     |  |     | 55 |  |           | Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz       
|Carlos Francisco del Río Carcaño         |  | Director (AMP)                       |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 64 |  |           | José Manyuel Aísa Mancho    
|Julián Fernández Rodes                   |  | Director (AMP)                       |  | April 16, 2013     |  |     | 35 |  |           | Carlos Laviada Ocejo        
|Joaquin Vargas Guajardo **               |  | Director (Independent)               |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 60 |  |           |                            
|Álvaro Fernández Garza****               |  | Director (Independent)               |  | February 26, 2014  |  |     | 46 |  |           |                            
|Angel Losada Moreno**                    |  | Director (Independent)               |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 59 |  |           |                            
|Roberto Servitje Achutegui**             |  | Director (Independent)               |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 60 |  |           |                            
|Enrique Luis Castillo Sánchez Mejorada** |  | Director (Independent)               |  | April 16, 2012     |  |     | 57 |  |           |                            
|Carlos Cárdenas Guzmán**                 |  | Director (Independent)               |  | September 22, 2011 |  |     | 63 |  |           |                            
|Eduardo J. Gallastegui Armella***        |  | Director (Appointed by Grupo México) |  | July 25, 2010      |  |     | 57 |  |           |                            



|* | Elected by AMP as holder of Series BB shares, which represents 15% of our capital stock.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** | Independent directors elected to comply with the Securities Market Law (Ley del Mercado de Valores).
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|*** | Director representing Grupo México as shareholder or group of shareholders owning 10% of our capital stock.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|**** | Provisional Director appointed by the Board of Directors, subject to ratification at the Shareholders Meeting on April 23, 2014.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo Sánchez Navarro Redo. Eduardo Sánchez Navarro Redo is the chairman of our board of directors. He is currently
also the chairman of AMP. He is the founder of Grupo Questro, a real estate investment group with substantial holdings in Los Cabos, including luxury resorts and residential developments such as Cabo Real and Puerto Los Cabos. He is also a member of
the board of directors and vice chairman of Cultiva (the holding company for GEPP and Grupo Azucarero) and a member of the Mexican Resort Development Association (AMDETUR) since 1991, which is an organization that includes 90% of tourism real estate
developers in the country. He is the vice president of the National Tourist Business Counsel (CNET) and has served as president of the Hotels and Tourism Companies Investors Association (AIHET). He is also the president and founder of the
Coordinating Counsel of Los Cabos.

Francisco Javier Marín San Andrés. Francisco Javier Marín San
Andrés was elected to the Companys board of directors on August 1, 2001, as a director nominee. He is Director General of Aena Aeropuertos, S.A. He is also Managing Director of Aena Internacional, a member of the Board of the
engineering company INECO, and a member of the Boards of the Mexican Company Aeropuertos Mexicanos del Pacífico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. He joined Aena in 1991 and he has occupied different executive posts since then, including Director General of
Air Navigation, Director of Corporate Development and Director General of Aena Internacional, a subsidiary company that manages Aenas activity abroad. He has also served in various positions at the Technical University of Madrid, in the
Directorate General of Civil Aviation, in the Experimental Centre of Eurocontrol in Paris, and in the business group Indra. He has a Degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Universidad Politécnica of Madrid, a Masters Degree in
Financial Management from the Official Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Madrid and he has completed an Executive Management Program (PADE) at the IESE Business School.

Carlos Francisco del Río Carcaño.Mr. del Río Carcaño was elected to the Companys board of
directors on April 16, 2012, as a director nominee. Mr. del Río Carcaño is the Managing Director of International Concessions at Abertis, headquartered in Barcelona, Spain. As part of a recent reorganization within the
Abertis Group, Mr. del Río has assumed responsibility for several motorways in Argentina, Colombia, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. This change reflects the Groups current emphasis on international growth.
Additionally, Mr. del Río has retained responsibility for the remaining airports of the Abertis Airports division located in Jamaica, Mexico and Chile. Abertis Airports includes a portfolio of 29 airports in 7 countries, including the
United Kingdom, the United States of America, Sweden and Colombia, as well as in Jamaica, Mexico and Chile. Before joining Abertis Airports in 2007, Mr. del Río served as the CEO of the Company. Prior to 2001, Mr. del Río was
Director General of Control y Montajes Industriales CYMI S.A., President of CAE ASIA in Singapore, Executive Director of ENELEC in Portugal, and Non Executive Director of DYCTEL and MAKIBER, all subsidiaries of ACS Group. Mr. del Río
received a telecommunications engineering degree from ETSIS Madrid.



126



---

##### Table of Contents

Julián Fernández Rodes. Mr. Fernández Rodes was elected to the
Companys board of directors on April 16, 2013. He is a senior legal counsel for Abertis Infraestructuras, S.A. and has relevant experience in corporate and contract law in various European and American jurisdictions. He has advised
Abertis in several high-profile transnational deals in the recent past. He previously worked as an associate for an international law firm based in Spain and focused his practice on corporate and commercial law and national and cross-border M&A.
He holds a degree from the Universidad Cardenal Herrera- CEU and has a Masters Degree in Corporate Law from the Instituto de Empresa. He is a member of the Milan (Italy) and Alicante (Spain) bar associations.

Joaquin Vargas Guajardo. Mr. Vargas Guajardo was elected to the Companys board of directors on April 16, 2012 as an
independent director nominee. He is Chairman of the board of directors of Grupo MVS Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V., which includes, among others, radio stations such as MVS News, EXA FM and La Mejor, as well as DISH satellite television services and
the television channel 52MX. He currently serves on the board of directors of the following publically traded companies: Vitro, Grupo Financiero Santander and Medica Sur. He is also a member of the board of directors of El Universal newspaper and
Costamex. He is also a board member of the Panamericana University, among others.

Álvaro Fernández Garza.Mr. Fernández Garza was elected to the Companys board of directors on February 26, 2014 as a provisional director nominee. He serves as a General Manager of ALFA. He currently serves on the board of directors of Vitro,
ALFA and CYDSA. He is also a member of the board of directors of the Universidad de Monterrey (UDEM) and the Museo de Arte Contemporaneo de Monterrey (MARCO). He holds a Bachelor ́s Degree in Economics from the University of Notre Dame, a
Masters Degree in business administration from Instituto Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey and an MBA from Georgetown University.

Angel Losada Moreno. Mr. Losada Moreno has a degree in Business Administration from the Universidad Anahuac. He is currently
Chairman of the board and CEO of Grupo Gigante, S.A.B. de C.V. He is a member of the boards of directors of several well-known Mexican and American companies and organizations, including Teléfonos de México, S.A. de C.V., Grupo
Financiero Banamex  Citigroup, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Laboratorios Novag and MD Anderson. He has also served as Chairman of the board of the Mexican National Association of Retailers (Asociación
Nacional de Tiendas de Autoservicio y Departamentales, A.C., or ANTAD), director and member of the board of directors of the Food Marketing Institute of the United States and member of the board of Mexico Citys National Chamber
of Commerce (Cámara Nacional de Comercio de la Ciudad de México).

Roberto Servitje Achutegui.
Mr. Servitje Achutegui was elected to the Companys board of directors on April 16, 2012 as an independent director nominee. He has 24 years of experience in the food and beverage industry in Grupo Bimbo, S.A. and as president of
Grupo Altex S.A., a diversified agro-industrial group, since January 2000. He received an MBA degree with a double major in Marketing and Finance from Northwestern University (Kellogg). He is also a member of the board in various companies such as
Grupo Elektra, Banco Azteca, Grupo Lacrem (in Barcelona) and Financiera Independencia. He also serves as co-chair of Mexicos Vision for Sustainable Agriculture at the World Economic Forum and as Treasurer of the Patronato de Arte
Contemporáneo and Fundación Olga y Rufino Tamayo.

Enrique Luis Castillo Sánchez Mejorada.Mr. Castillo
Sánchez Mejorada was elected to the Companys board of directors on April 16, 2012 as an independent director nominee. From May 2013, Mr. Castillo Sánchez Mejorada has acted as a Senior Partner at Ventura Capital
Privado, S.A. de C.V. and since October 2013 he has served as Chairman of the Board at Maxcom Telecomunicaciones, S.A.B. de



127



---

##### Table of Contents

C.V. From April 2011 to May 2013, Mr. Castillo Sánchez Mejorada was a Senior Advisor at Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. (GFNorte). From October 2000 to March 2011,
Mr. Castillo Sánchez Mejorada was the Chairman of the board and Chief Executive Officer of Ixe Grupo Financiero, S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexican financial holding company that merged into GFNorte in April 2011. In addition, Mr. Castillo
Sánchez Mejorada was the president of the Mexican Banking Association (Asociación de Bancos de México) from March 2007 to March 2009. Currently, Mr. Castillo Sánchez Mejorada serves as an independent
director on the boards of (i) Grupo Herdez, S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexican holding company for the manufacture, sale and distribution of food products; (ii) Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexico-based holding company that, through its subsidiaries, is
engaged in the petrochemical, food processing, automotive and telecommunication sectors; (iii) Organización Cultiba, S.A.B. de C.V. (formerly Grupo Embotelladoras Unidas, S.A.B. de C.V.), a Mexico-based holding company primarily engaged
in the beverages industry; (iv) Médica Sur, S.A.B. de C.V., a Mexico-based company engaged in the hospital business; (v) Southern Copper Corporation, a world-class mining and metallurgical company, that produces and commercializes
copper and by-products thereof. Mr. Castillo Sánchez Mejorada holds a Bachelors degree in Business Administration from the Universidad Anáhuac in Mexico City, Mexico.

Carlos Cárdenas Guzmán.Mr. Cárdenas has been a member of our board of directors since 2011. He also serves
as President of our Audit Committee. Mr. Cárdenas is a Certified Public Accountant with a degree from the Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara and a Masters Degree in Tax Law from the Universidad Panamericana (IPADE). He is a
retired partner of Ernst & Young Mexico after 39 years of active service. He also currently serves on the Boards of Directors and Audit Committees of numerous large Mexican Companies, including as: i) Secretary and former president of The
American British Cowdray Medical Center, I.A.P., ii) Board member and Audit Committee President of CHG-MERIDIAN México, S.A.P.I. de C.V., iii) Board member of Reaseguradora Patria, S.A.B., and iv) Statutory Auditor of General de Seguros,
S.A.B. He is also a member of several business and professional associations; most notably, as President of the Mexican Institute of Certified Public Accountants (IMCP) for 2012  2013.

Eduardo J. Gallastegui Armella. Mr. Eduardo Gallastegui has been a member of our board of directors since he was appointed by
Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. in July 2010. In 1985, he became a founding partner of the law firm Gallestegui y Lozano, S.C. Prior to founding his own law firm, he was previously a partner at Vazquez Pando, Celis Azuela y Asociados from 1982
to 1985. Previously Mr. Gallastegui was an attorney with Noriega y Escobedo, S.C. and Gillette de México, S.A. de C.V. Mr. Gallastegui has a wide range of professional experience advising Mexican and foreign companies on matters of
corporate governance, commercial and financial law, mergers and acquisitions, arbitration, telecommunications, antitrust, pharmaceuticals and foreign investments in Mexico. Mr. Gallastegui received his law degree in November 1978 from the
Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico City.

Executive Officers

Pursuant to our bylaws, the directors appointed by the holders of Series BB shares are entitled to appoint and remove our top-level
executive officers.



128



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table lists our top-level executive officers, their current positions and their
dates of appointment as executive officers:



|                                |  |                                                 |  |                        |  |     |    | 
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --- | -- | 
|Name                            |  | Current position                                |  | Executiveofficer since |  | Age |   
|Fernando Bosque Mohíno          |  | Chief Executive Officer                         |  | January 1, 2011        |  |     | 60 | 
|Raúl Revuelta Musalem           |  | Chief Financial Officer                         |  | June 6, 2013           |  |     | 37 | 
|Sergio Enrique Flores Ochoa     |  | General Counsel                                 |  | February 8, 2002       |  |     | 61 | 
|Miguel Aliaga Gargollo          |  | Investor Relations and Public Relations Officer |  | May 8, 2006            |  |     | 44 | 
|Jorge Luis Valdespino Rivera    |  | Director of Human Resources and Quality Control |  | August 21, 2006        |  |     | 50 | 
|Tomás Enrique Ramírez Vargas    |  | Director of Commercial Activities               |  | August 1, 2013         |  |     | 33 | 
|José Ignacio Ascacíbar Martínez |  | Director of Technical Operations                |  | April 1, 2010          |  |     | 49 | 

Fernando Bosque Mohíno.Mr. Bosque was named our Chief Executive Officer effective
January 1, 2011. Fernando Bosque is a graduate in Economics and Business from the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and has over 35 years of experience in the airport sector. He began his career in 1976 the Federal Aviation and
Transportation Department in Spain. Recently, he served as the CEO of MBJ Airports Limited, in Montego Bay, Jamaica, appointed by Abertis. He has extensive knowledge of the airport industry having previously been the Chief Financial Officer of AENA
Internacional, one of our strategic partners. He served as a member of ASURs Board, working as Ferrovials concession director, and consequently has a strong understanding of the privatization structure of Mexican Airports.

Raúl Revuelta Musalem. Mr. Revuelta was named our Chief Financial Officer in June 2013. Since September 2009,
Mr. Revuelta had served as Director of Commercial Activities. He has broad experience in the federal concessions industry. Mr. Revuelta joined our team in January 2006 as the Aeronautical Revenue and Airport Marketing Manager. Prior to
that, he served as the Head of Finance at the Ministry of Communications and Transportations Privatization Unit (UACE) for six years. Mr. Revuelta holds a Bachelors Degree in Economics from the Instituto Tecnológico de
Estudios Superiores de Monterrey (ITESM).

Sergio Enrique Flores Ochoa. Mr. Flores was named our General Counsel in
February 2002. Previously, he was the Manager of legal matters for the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency and the Assistant District Attorney for the Federal District of Mexico. In addition, he was head of the legal department of
INFONAVIT and Manager of legal matters for NAFIN. Mr. Flores received a degree in law as well as a masters degree from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

Miguel Aliaga Gargollo. Mr. Aliaga Gargollo was named our Director of Investor Relations in May 2006. He also serves as the
Director of Public Relations. He has 12 years of experience in corporate finance and investor relations. Previously he served in various capacities at Grupo Financiero del Sureste, S.A. de C.V., including in the position of Risk Management Director.
He also worked as the Investor Relations Officer at Industrias Bachoco, S.A.B. de C.V. Finally, he was formerly responsible for collections and portfolio development at Grupo Costamex, S.A. de C.V. Mr. Aliaga holds a degree in industrial
engineering from the Universidad Nuevo Mundo in Mexico City and has an MBA degree from the Instituto de Empresa in Madrid, Spain.

Jorge Luis Valdespino Rivera. Mr. Valdespino was named our Director of Human Resources in August 2006. He has 14 years of
experience as a human resources executive. He worked in the pharmaceutical industry at Searle de México, S.A. de C.V. as Human Resources Manager, and in the automotive industry at Valeo Group as Human Resources Director, and at Hella de
México, S.A. de C.V. as Human Resources Corporate Director. Mr. Valdespino received an undergraduate degree in business administration and a postgraduate degree in human resources from the Universidad Tecnológica de
México.



129



---

##### Table of Contents

Tomas Enrique Ramírez Vargas.Mr. Ramírez was named our Director
of Commercial Activities in August 2013. He joined the Company in 2007 as the Commercial Development Manager and has previous experience in route development and infrastructure concessions. Mr. Ramírez holds a Bachelors
Degree in Management and Finance from the Universidad Panamericana and a MBA through a joint program by the ITESM and the Thunderbird School of Global Management.

José Ignacio Ascacíbar Martínez. Mr. Ascacíbar was named our Director of Technical Operations in April
2010. Mr. Ascacíbar holds a degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, as well as an MBA from the Instituto de Empresa in Madrid, a Certificate in Business Development from IESE in Madrid, a
Masters in Airport Operations from ETSIA in Madrid and a Certificate in European Studies from C.I.F.E. in Madrid. In 1989, Mr. Ascacíbar began his career at Iberia, Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A., where he was Manager
of Flight Programs. In 1995, Mr. Ascacíbar was the Director of Information Systems at Aeropuertos Españoles de AENA, in addition to being a member of Aeropuertos Españoles Executive Committee.

The business address of our directors and executive officers is our principal executive headquarters.

Compensation of Directors and Executives

For 2013, the aggregate compensation earned by our directors, alternate directors and executive officers was approximately Ps. 33.0
million, including compensation paid to the directors, alternate directors and executive officers of our operating subsidiaries (19 people in total). We have not established any pension, retirement or similar benefits or arrangements for these
individuals. The compensation paid to our independent directors, including the director appointed by Grupo México, amounted to Ps. 4.1 million in 2013. These directors receive a base annual compensation of US$44,100 for their service on
our board of directors; additionally, our directors receive supplemental compensation of 17.5% of the base annual compensation for service as President of our Audit Committee, 10% of the base annual compensation for service as member of our Audit
Committee and 5% of the base annual compensation for service as a member of our Acquisition Committee or our Compensation Committee. The directors elected by AMP do not receive compensation from GAP for serving on our board of directors.

None of our directors, alternate directors or executive officers is the beneficial owner of more than 1% of any class of our capital
stock. Mr. Carlos Laviada Ocejo, who serves as an alternate director for our board of directors, is a general partner of Weston Hill Equity Holdings, L.P., a company holding more than 1% of our total capital stock (see Item 7,Major
Shareholders and Related Party Transactions Major Shareholders). None of our directors or executive officers is entitled to benefits upon termination under their service contracts with us, except for what is due to them according to
the Mexican Federal Labor Law.

Board Committees

Our bylaws provide for four committees to assist the board of directors with the management of our business: an Operating Committee, an Audit
and Corporate Practices Committee, an Acquisitions Committee and a Nominations and Compensation Committee. The Audit Committee, to which our bylaws have granted the duties provided for in the Securities Market Law for Mexican corporate practices
committees, is the only legally required committee. The other committees have been established to assist the board of directors. The board of directors may establish further committees from time to time.



130



---

##### Table of Contents

Operating Committee

The Operating Committee, which, pursuant to our bylaws, should have six members and three alternates, is responsible for, among other matters,
proposing and approving certain plans and policies relating to our business, investments and administration, including approval of the Master Development Programs of our subsidiary concession holders, our dividend policy and investments of less than
U.S.$ 3.0 million that are not provided for in our annual budget. Pursuant to our bylaws, the board of directors is authorized to appoint the six members of the Operating Committee. Board members elected by the holders of Series BB
shares have the right to appoint three of the committee members. As of the date of this report, the proprietary members of the Operating Committee are Fernando Bosque Mohíno, the chief executive officer who presides over the committee,
Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz, Carlos Laviada Ocejo, Raúl Revuelta Musalem, the chief financial officer, Tomás Enrique Ramírez Vargas, director of commercial activities and José Ignacio Ascacíbar Martínez,
director of technical operations. Carlos del Río Carcaño, Carlos Porrón Suárez and Eduardo Sánchez-Navarro Redo serve as alternates for Fernando Bosque Mohíno, Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz and Carlos Laviada
Ocejo, respectively.

Audit and Corporate Practices Committee

The Audit and Corporate Practices Committee, which must have a minimum of three members, the majority of whom must be members of our board of
directors, is responsible, among other things, for: (i) monitoring the compliance of our directors, officers and employees (and those of our subsidiaries) with our (and their) bylaws (estatutos sociales) and applicable law,
(ii) naming, and supervising the work of, our independent auditors and (iii) receiving and investigating internal complaints or other information concerning our systems of internal control and other such matters. The Audit and Corporate
Practices Committee is also responsible for reviewing our corporate governance and all related-party transactions (according to the requirements of our bylaws and the Mexican Market Law), including transactions with AMP. The members of the board of
directors elected by the holders of Series BB shares are entitled to propose the appointment to the Audit and Corporate Practices Committee of the number of members representing 20% of the committees total members, but at least one member
who must also fulfill applicable independence requirements. The president of this committee is elected at the annual shareholders meeting. The composition of the Audit and Corporate Practices Committee must at all times be compliant with all
applicable laws and regulations, including independence requirements, for every jurisdiction in which our securities are listed or quoted. As of the date of this report, the members of the Audit and Corporate Practices Committee are Carlos
Cárdenas Guzmán, Enrique Luis Castillo Sánchez Mejorada and Angel Losada Moreno.

Acquisitions Committee

The Acquisitions Committee is responsible for ensuring compliance with our procurement policies set forth in our bylaws. The committee is
formed by two members and one alternate. Among other things, these policies require that the Acquisitions Committee approve any transaction or series of related transactions between us and a third party involving consideration in excess of
U.S.$ 400,000 and that any contract between us, on the one hand, and AMP or any of its related parties, on the other hand, be awarded pursuant to a bidding process, which, in the case of AMP, must involve at least three other bidders. Our
bylaws provide that a shareholders meeting will determine the number of members of the Acquisitions Committee, which must be composed primarily of members of the board of directors. The members of the board of directors elected by the holders
of Series BB shares are entitled to appoint to the committee the number of members representing 20% of its total members but at a minimum, one member. As of the date of this report, the members of the Acquisitions Committee are Carlos Laviada
Ocejo and Joaquin Vargas Guajardo. Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz was elected to serve as an alternate member to Carlos Laviada Ocejo. A secretary has also been appointed who is not a member of the committee. In the case of a proposed
transaction between us and AMP or any related party, we are required to invite, pursuant to the bylaws, at least three contractors to bid on the transaction and, in the case that a third-party contractors bid is equal to or less than
AMPs bid, the transaction is awarded to the third-party contractor.



131



---

##### Table of Contents

Nominations and Compensation Committee

The Nominations and Compensation Committee is responsible for nominating candidates for election to our board of directors and making
recommendations regarding the compensation of our directors and officers. The committee also serves in a corporate governance role within its subject-matter ambit. Our bylaws provide that a shareholders meeting will determine the number of
members of the committee. The holders of the Series B and Series BB shares, each acting as a class, are each entitled to name one member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee. The remaining members of the committee, if any, are
designated by the two members who were selected by the Series B and Series BB shareholders. If these two members are unable to reach agreement, the remaining members of the committee will be designated by the majority of the votes in the
shareholders meeting, provided that, in such case, holders of the Series BB Shares will be entitled to appoint 20% of the members but at a minimum, one member. Members of the committee serve for a term of one year. At each annual
shareholders meeting, the Nominations and Compensation Committee is required to present a list of candidates for election as directors for the vote of the Series B shareholders. As of the date of this report, the members of the
Nominations and Compensation Committee are Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz and Álvaro Fernández Garza. Carlos del Río Carcaño was elected to serve as an alternate member to Rodrigo Marabini Ruíz.

Employees

The following table sets forth
the number of employees and a breakdown of employees by main category of activity and geographic location as of the end of each year indicated.

Employees



|                        |  |              |       |  |      |  |     |         |  |  |     | 
|----------------------- |  | ------------ | ----- |  | ---- |  | --- | ------- |  |  | --- | 
|                        |  | December 31, |      
|                        |  | 2011         |       |  | 2012 |  |     | 2013(2) | 
|Categories of activity: |  |              |       |  |      |  |     |         |  |  |     | 
|Airport operations      |  |              | 720   |  |      |  | 583 |         |  |  | 537 | 
|Airport maintenance     |  |              | 138   |  |      |  | 133 |         |  |  | 144 | 
|Administration(1)       |  |              | 185   |  |      |  | 185 |         |  |  | 197 | 
|Geographic location:    |  |              |       |  |      |  |     |         |  |  |     | 
|Guadalajara             |  |              | 194   |  |      |  | 142 |         |  |  | 143 | 
|Tijuana                 |  |              | 127   |  |      |  | 86  |         |  |  | 88  | 
|Los Cabos               |  |              | 88    |  |      |  | 80  |         |  |  | 84  | 
|Puerto Vallarta         |  |              | 107   |  |      |  | 76  |         |  |  | 77  | 
|Hermosillo              |  |              | 66    |  |      |  | 63  |         |  |  | 55  | 
|Guanajuato              |  |              | 66    |  |      |  | 62  |         |  |  | 51  | 
|La Paz                  |  |              | 47    |  |      |  | 47  |         |  |  | 44  | 
|Mexicali                |  |              | 47    |  |      |  | 48  |         |  |  | 44  | 
|Aguascalientes          |  |              | 50    |  |      |  | 49  |         |  |  | 45  | 
|Morelia                 |  |              | 57    |  |      |  | 56  |         |  |  | 48  | 
|Los Mochis              |  |              | 41    |  |      |  | 40  |         |  |  | 38  | 
|Manzanillo              |  |              | 36    |  |      |  | 35  |         |  |  | 33  | 
|                        |  |              |       |  |      |  |     |         |  |  |     | 
|Total(1)                |  |              | 1,043 |  |      |  | 901 |         |  |  | 878 | 
|                        |  |              |       |  |      |  |     |         |  |  |     | 



|(1) | Total at December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 includes 117, 117 and 128 employees, respectively, of Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V., our administrative services subsidiary
located in Guadalajara.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | As of April 10, 2014, CORSA employed 426 people, SIAP employed 369 people and Puerta Cero Parking, S.A. de C.V. employed 82 people.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



132



---

##### Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2013, 50% of our employees were non-unionized employees. The
remaining 50% employees were unionized. All of our unionized employees are members of local chapters of the Mexican National Union of Airport Workers (Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Industria Aeroportuaria y Servicios Similares y
Conexos de la República Mexicana), an organization formed in 1998 whose members include employees of the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency as well as of the three other airport groups (the Southeast Group, the Mexico City
Group and the Central-North Group) operating in Mexico. Labor relations with our employees are governed by one collective bargaining agreement relating to each one of our 12 airport subsidiaries; which is negotiated by the respective local chapter
of the union. As is typical in Mexico, wages are renegotiated every year, while other terms and conditions of employment are renegotiated every two years. In 2012, we successfully renegotiated our collective bargaining agreement, thereby securing a
favorable and productive work environment for our employees for 2013 and 2014. We believe that our relations with our employees are good, and the wages we pay our employees are similar to those paid to employees of similar airport operating
companies in Mexico. During October 2014, we will be required to renegotiate the collective bargaining agreement.

We offer a
savings plan available to all of our employees pursuant to which our employees may make bi-weekly contributions of up to 13% of their pre-tax salaries. We make bi-weekly contributions matching each employees contribution. Employees are
entitled to withdraw funds from their accounts on an annual basis. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, we made a total of Ps. 15.1 million, Ps. 15.3 million and Ps. 16 million, respectively, in payments to employees accounts pursuant to the
savings plan.

Funds in the savings plan may be used to make loans to employees and are otherwise invested in securities listed on the
Mexican Stock Exchange or in treasury bills issued by the Mexican Treasury Department.



|Item 7. | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
|------- | -------------------------------------------------

MAJOR
SHAREHOLDERS

Prior to our initial public offering in 2006, the Mexican government owned 476,850,000 Series B shares,
representing 85% of our issued and outstanding capital stock. After the offering, the Mexican government ceased to be a shareholder.

The
following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of April 4, 2014.



|                                    |  |                  |             |  |                                  |  |            |          |  |  |           |  |  |  |       | 
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ---------- | -------- |  |  | --------- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|                                    |  | Number of Shares |             |  | Percentage of totalshare capital | 
|Identity of shareholder             |  | B Shares         |             |  | BB Shares                        |  |            | B Shares |  |  | BB Shares | 
|AMP                                 |  |                  |            |  |                                  |  | 84,150,000 |          |  |  |          |  |  |  | 15.00 | 
|Grupo México S.A.B. de C.V. (1)     |  |                  | 142,490,472 |  |                                  |  |           |          |  |  | 25.40     |  |  |  |      | 
|Weston Hill Equity Holdings, LP (2) |  |                  | 34,939,447  |  |                                  |  |           |          |  |  | 6.23      |  |  |  |      | 
|Public (3)                          |  |                  | 299,420,081 |  |                                  |  |           |          |  |  | 53.37     |  |  |  |      | 



|(1) | Based on the Form 13D filed on April 2, 2014 by Grupo México.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Based on the Form 13D filed on January 16, 2014 by Weston Hill Equity Holdings, LP. Mr. Carlos Laviada Ocejo, who serves as an alternate director for our board of directors, is a general partner of Weston Hill
Equity Holdings, L.P. In addition, Mr. Laviada Ocejo and his wife, Mrs. Laura Diez Barroso, are investors in CMA, which owns 33.33% of AMP (see Item 4, Information on the Company History and Development of the Company 
Investment by AMP).
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



133



---

##### Table of Contents

|(3) | Based on reports of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC, (i) Fidelity Management & Research Company beneficially owned less than 5% of our Series B shares as of April 4, 2014 compared to 5.1% as
of May 31, 2010, (ii) Fidelity Management & Research, Inc. (U.K.) beneficially owned less than 5% of our Series B shares as of April 4, 2014 compared to 5.1% as of May 31, 2010, and (iii) Mondrian Investment
Partners Limited beneficially owned less than 5% of our Series B shares as of April 4, 2014 compared to 5.68% as of January 5, 2011.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

AMP holds all of our Series BB shares, representing 15% of our total share capital. Special rights and restrictions attached to
our Series BB shares are described under Item 4, Information on the Company  History and Development of the Company and Item 10,Additional Information  Corporate Governance  Voting Rights and
Shareholders Meetings. As of March 31, 2014, approximately 15.6% of our Series B shares were held in the form of ADSs. 76% of the holders of our ADSs (64 holders, including The Depository Trust Company) had registered
addresses in the United States.

AMP Trust, Bylaws and Shareholders Agreement

The rules governing the sale of our Series BB shares to AMP required that AMP place all of its Series BB shares in trust in order to
guarantee AMPs performance of its obligations under the technical assistance agreement and AMPs commitment to maintain its interest in us for a specified period. Accordingly, AMP has placed its shares in trust with Bancomext. This trust
provides that AMP may instruct Bancomext with respect to the voting of the shares held in trust that represent up to 10% of our capital stock; the remaining 5% is required to be voted in the same manner as the majority of all shares voted at the
relevant shareholders meeting. Under our bylaws and the trust, AMP could not sell any of its Series BB shares before August 25, 2004. Since the end of this no-sale period, AMP has been permitted to transfer up to 49% of its
Series BB shares without restriction. After August 25, 2009, AMP may sell in any year up to 20% of its remaining 51% ownership interest in us represented by Series BB shares. The terms of the trust will be extended for an additional
15 years if, at the end of the initial 15-year term, AMP holds shares representing more than 10% of our capital stock. AMP may terminate the trust before the second 15-year term begins if: (i) AMP holds less than 10% of our capital stock at the
end of the initial term; and (ii) the technical services agreement has been terminated. AMP is required to deposit in the trust any additional shares of our capital stock that it acquires.

AMPs shareholders have entered into a shareholders agreement that provides that AENA will have the right to appoint our director
of technical operations, meanwhile: (i) the appointment of AMPs representatives to our board of directors and board committees shall be made on a rotating basis; and (ii) any right of AMP regarding the appointment of our chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, director of investor relations, general counsel, director of human resources, director of commercial activities, the secretary of our board of directors and most other matters relating to AMPs
participation in us, must be made, in principle, pursuant the unanimous consent of AMPs shareholders. Other mechanisms exist in case unanimous consent is not obtained to avoid deadlocks that might affect our operations.

Under the terms of the participation agreement and the trust agreement, AMPs key partners are required to maintain their current 25.5%
ownership interest in AMP until August 25, 2014. To the extent that a key partner acquires shares of AMP in excess of its current 25.5% interest, this additional interest may be sold without restriction. There can be no assurance that the terms
of the participation agreement or the trust would not be amended to reduce or eliminate these ownership commitments. If AMP or any of its shareholders defaults on any obligation contained in the trust agreement, or if AMP defaults on any obligation
contained in the participation agreement or the technical assistance agreement, after specified notice and cure provisions, the trust agreement provides that the trustee may sell 5% of the shares held in the trust and pay the proceeds of such sale
to us as liquidated damages.



134



---

##### Table of Contents

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Arrangements with AMP and its Affiliates

The rules for the sale of the Series BB shares required AMP, us and the Ministry of Communications and Transportation to enter into a
participation agreement, which established the framework for the technical assistance agreement and the Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior, S.N.C., or Bancomext, trust agreement.

Pursuant to the technical assistance agreement and the participation agreement, AMP and its shareholders agreed to provide management
and consulting services and transfer to us technical assistance and technical and industry expertise related to the operation of airports. The agreements have initial terms of approximately 15 years, expiring on August 25, 2014. The technical
assistance agreement automatically renews for successive five-year terms unless one party provides the other a notice of termination at least 60 days prior to a scheduled expiration date. A decision by us to renew or cancel the technical assistance
agreement is subject to the approval of 51% of Series B shareholders other than AMP or any related party of AMP (to the extent that AMP or any such related party holds Series B shares). The agreement will only remain in effect if AMP
continues to hold at least 7.65% of our capital stock. If the agreement does not remain in place, our management could change and due to the lack of technical assistance, our operations could be adversely and significantly affected. Certain of our
shareholders have objected to the renewal of the agreement and legal proceedings have been commenced. For more detail information see Item Item 8,Financial Information  Legal Proceedings  Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V.
convokes Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting via irregular channels.

Subsequent to January 1, 2002, the
technical assistance fee has been required to equal the greater of U.S.$ 4.0 million adjusted annually for inflation (measured by the U.S. Consumer Price Index) or 5% of our annual consolidated income from operations (calculated prior to
deducting the technical assistance fee and depreciation and amortization in accordance with MFRS). We believe that this structure creates an incentive for AMP to increase our annual consolidated earnings.

The technical assistance agreement allows AMP, its shareholders and their affiliates to render additional services to us only if our
Acquisitions Committee determines that these related parties have submitted the most favorable bid in a bidding process with at least three unrelated parties. This process is described in Item 6,Directors, Senior Management and
Employees  Board Committees.

In 2011, 2012 and 2013, we recognized expenses of Ps. 245,000 (U.S.$ 17,526), Ps.
1,315,000 (U.S.$ 101,075) and Ps. 1,496,000 (U.S.$ 114,211), respectively, that were paid to AMP. Pursuant to the technical assistance agreement, the fee paid to AMP and its affiliates was approximately Ps. 136.2 million (U.S.$ 9.8 million),
Ps. 155.1 million (U.S.$ 11.9 million) and Ps. 171.5 million (U.S.$ 13.1 million) for 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.



|Item 8. | Financial Information
|------- | ---------------------

See Item 18,Financial Statements
and our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1. Since the date of the financial statements, no significant change has occurred.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

General

We are periodically involved in
certain legal proceedings that are incidental to the normal conduct of our business, none of which is expected to have a material or adverse effect on our business. In addition to those legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our businesses, in
recent years, we have also been subject, directly and indirectly, to the litigation proceedings that are summarized below.



135



---

##### Table of Contents

Litigation related to Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. and suits seeking to void certain of our bylaws

On June 13, 2011, Grupo México announced that it intended to acquire more than 30% and up to 100% of our shares
outstanding at that time, excluding treasury shares.

Articles X and XII of our bylaws, among others, limit the ability of Series B
shareholders, directly or with related parties, other than AMP, to hold more than 10% of our outstanding capital stock, and any shares held in excess of that amount must be sold in a public offering. In accordance with our bylaws, until the public
offering of such shares takes place, such excess shares have no voting power and cannot be represented in any Shareholders Meeting.

Grupo México and certain of its subsidiaries commenced two legal proceedings, among others, seeking (i) to modify our bylaws to
eliminate the foregoing limitations and (ii) to terminate AMPs special rights that stem from AMPs ownership of our Series BB shares.

In particular, one subsidiary of Grupo México, Infraestructura y Transportes México, S.A. de C.V. (ITM), filed a
legal proceeding against us on November 4, 2011, seeking to void AMPs ownership of our Series BB shares as granted by the participation agreement between AMP and us, which would result in the termination of AMPs veto, appointment
and other special rights. Additionally, ITMs suit sought the repayment of all economic benefits conferred by us upon AMP during the period in which AMP has held our shares. We filed an initial reply in this proceeding on November 25,
2011. On March 7, 2012, we were notified by our external legal counsel that a ruling was issued in our favor, which found a lack of jurisdiction by the civil court due to the administrative nature of the claim. Although we received notice that
this proceeding had concluded, a federal court later granted a direct amparo appeal that had been filed by Grupo México on June 6, 2012. Therefore, on July, 13 2012, the legal proceeding was recommenced in the appropriate federal
civil court. On October 22, 2013 we filed briefs responding to the plaintiffs arguments. As of the filing of this report, this proceeding is still pending.

In October 2010, a legal proceeding was filed against us in a civil court in Mexico City. The complaint sought to have the court grant relief
by, among others, declaring Articles X and XII of our bylaws null and void. The plaintiffs are Grupo México and its subsidiary ITM. On September 30, 2011, the court issued a favorable decision for the plaintiffs, and we appealed this
decision. On February 25, 2013, we were notified that an intermediate appellate court had confirmed the lower courts decision holding certain of our by-laws to be invalid. We filed a direct amparo appeal on March 19,
2013. On April 10, 2013, we were informed that the court ordered the suspension of the civil courts decisions, pending the resolution of our appeal. On February 19, 2014, the Mexican Supreme Court agreed to review the legal
proceeding regarding ownership limits contained in our by-laws that impose a 10% ownership threshold, stating that it considered this issue a matter of national interest and significance.

Until a final decision not subject to appeal is issued, our by-laws remain valid and binding upon our shareholders. However, a final decision
not subject to appeal that is adverse to our bylaws could adversely affect our operations in a manner that we cannot predict. Additionally, if successful, a final decision in the proceeding by ITM could affect AMPs special rights. For
additional information, see Item 3, Risk Factors  AMP controls our management, and AMPs interests may differ from those of other shareholders.

We cannot predict how the courts will decide the pending proceedings concerning the validity of our bylaws and AMPs control in relation
to our operations nor the content or reach of any decision rendered.



136



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. seeks to void certain resolutions adopted at our Corporate
Shareholders Meetings

April 27, 2011  Annual General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting

Prior to our General Shareholders Meeting held on April 27, 2011, Grupo México indicated its intent to appoint two members to
our board of directors, one for each 10% ownership interest it held in us at the time. However, according to our bylaws as in effect on that date, ownership of our common stock is limited to 10%, and consequently, the right of representation on our
board of directors and the right to vote at our shareholders meetings is also limited to 10%. During the April 27, 2011 General Shareholders Meeting, Grupo Méxicos request was rejected, and Grupo México was asked
to appoint a single board member in accordance with their rights under our bylaws. In response, Grupo México initiated legal action seeking to nullify the resolutions adopted regarding the designation of representatives of our Series B shares
to our board directors. On May 27, 2011, a civil court provisionally suspended the related resolutions. We appealed the decision on June 17, 2011. Subsequently, the parties filed several legal proceedings, which have yet to be decided. As
of the time of the filing of this report, this legal proceeding remains pending. However, although Grupo México may have the right to appoint two directors, we consider the influence on our control and decisions to be limited.

April 16, 2012  Annual General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting

Following the annual General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting that took place April 16, 2012, we announced on June 4, 2012 that we
had become aware of a lawsuit filed by Grupo México and its subsidiary ITM, seeking to have the resolutions with respect to items VII, VIII and IX, adopted at the April 16, 2012 Shareholders Meeting, declared null and void. The
resolution for item VII relates to the appointment of members of the board of directors that represent 10% or more of our Series B shares; the resolution for item VIII relates to the appointment of members of the board of directors by
Series B shareholders; and the resolution for item IX is related to the composition of the our board of directors. Similarly to the lawsuit filed by Grupo México following our April 27, 2011 shareholders meeting, this
lawsuit relates to the limitations dictated by our bylaws, pursuant to which Grupo México was permitted to appoint only one director.

As a result of this lawsuit, a civil judge from the 16th Civil Court in Mexico City suspended the above-mentioned resolutions that had been
adopted at the April 16, 2012 meeting. The decision bars the person appointed at the meeting to replace the second director proposed by Grupo México from participating in any event as a member of the board of directors.
Additionally, one of our directors, Laura Diez Barroso Azcárraga, was barred from undertaking any functions as alternate to the chairman, Mr. Eduardo Sánchez Navarro Redo.

We have both responded to the lawsuit and appealed the decision regarding the suspension of the resolutions. The proceeding is continuing;
however, the issues in this case will be resolved together with the trial seeking to nullify the resolutions of the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting of 25 September 2012, as a result of a motion to join the related actions filed by GAP in the
proceeding regarding the September 25 meeting. As a result of the amparo proceeding we commenced in the matter regarding the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting of 25 September 2012, the claims in this proceeding cannot be resolved
until a decision in the amparo is made. We cannot predict how these proceedings will be resolved. However, although Grupo México may have the right to appoint two directors, we consider the influence on our control and decisions to be
limited.



137



---

##### Table of Contents

September 25, 2012  Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting

On October 4, 2012, we announced that on October 3, 2012, we complied with the capital reduction approved at the Extraordinary
Shareholders Meeting held on September 25, 2012. At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting, we succeeded in reaching a quorum of 75% of the shares entitled to vote in accordance with the provisions in our bylaws for calculating such
percentages. Accordingly, a reduction in the amount of our fixed capital stock proportionally between the historical value of the capital stock and the value of the amount as adjusted for inflation through December 31, 2007 was approved, for a
total amount of Ps. 870.0 million payable in cash in a proportional manner among the number of shares outstanding representing our capital stock on a date no later than October 3, 2012.

In accordance with the approved capital reduction, we made a payment to Indeval (Institución para el Depósito de
Valores), which was equivalent to Ps. 1.639281 per share outstanding, on October 3, 2012. However, after our payment to Indeval, Grupo México issued a press release announcing that the 50th Judge from the Mexico City Civil Court
had issued a decision that ordered us to immediately and unconditionally suspend the resolution related to the capital reduction. As we were otherwise not properly notified by the court of the injunction, we thereby became aware of the lawsuit filed
by Grupo México seeking the suspension of the resolutions adopted at the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held September 25, 2012. Despite not being notified by the competent court, and after we had complied with the resolutions
and completed the required payment, we were then informed by Indeval that Indeval would suspend the disbursement of the funds deposited by us, as Indeval had been notified of this judicial injunction that presumably ordered us, not Indeval, to
suspend the resolution related to the capital reduction. As of the date of this report, Indeval continues to hold the funds allocated for the capital reduction; we expect that Indeval will continue holding the funds until the injunction is resolved
judicially.

We have answered the lawsuit and also appealed the decision regarding the suspension of the capital reduction approved at the
Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting. Our appeal (Juicio de Amparo) seeks to lift the suspension of the resolutions adopted at the Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held in September, 2012. A resolution in the amparo proceeding is
pending.

As a result of a successful motion to join filed by GAP, a decision in this proceeding will be made together with the matter
regarding the Shareholders Meeting of April 16, 2012, due to the similarity of parties and claims. The matters, including the proceeding initiated against the injunction suspending the capital reduction, are still pending, and we cannot provide
any assurance as to any outcome or the content of any final ruling.

April 16, 2013  Annual General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting

Following the Annual General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, Grupo Mexico and its subsidiary ITM,
filed a new lawsuit against the resolutions taken at such meeting. Grupo Mexico and ITM failed to obtain the requested injunction to suspend said resolutions. Additionally, we appeared in the proceeding but also filed an amparo. Both
proceedings are pending.

We filed legal action against all the Mexican stock market brokers, seeking adherence to our bylaws

In accordance with the decision of the Mercantile Judge that instructs us and our directors and officers to take all necessary legal measures
to maintain and protect our bylaws (as described above), on February 15, 2012 we initiated a lawsuit against all Mexican stock market brokers seeking to defend our bylaws.

On February 29, 2012, we were informed that the court issued preliminary injunctions that require all Mexican stock market brokers to:

1. Act in accordance with Mexican law, our bylaws and market regulations.



138



---

##### Table of Contents

2. Uphold our bylaws, including Article X.

3. Not trade our shares for an individual, group or group of related entities, that could result in any way in the acquisition of an ownership
position that exceeds the 10% maximum allowed by Article X of our bylaws.

4. Not acquire or, in any way, negotiate transactions involving
our shares for Grupo México, ITM or any other entity that forms part of their business conglomerate, or is related thereto, since these entities have made known that they own an amount of our shares that is in excess of the maximum allowed by
Article X of our bylaws.

On December 14, 2012, the State of Jaliscos Fifth Mercantile Court issued a new ruling that
lifted the injunctions restricting Mexican stock market brokers. On January 3, 2013, we appealed the decision before the appropriate judicial authority, and on October 30, 2013, a final appellate court ratified the injunctions we had
initially obtained.

Grupo México, S.A.B. de C.V. convokes Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting via irregular channels

On November 16, 2013, an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting was convoked by means of a judicial order issued on November 12, 2013, by
the 38th Judge for Civil Matters in the Federal District, upon a petition submitted by Grupo México. This Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting was to take place on December 3, 2013. The stated objective of the meeting was the
possible approval of the non-renewal of the technical assistance agreement with AMP. We filed an amparo proceeding before the federal 6th Civil District Court for the First Circuit in order to halt the carrying out of the shareholders
meeting, and a provisional suspension of the shareholders meeting was granted on November 27, 2013. In addition, we filed for an injunction against the meeting before the 10th Judge for Commercial Matters for the city of Guadalajara,
Jalisco, from which we also received a favorable decision on November 29, 2013. Grupo México appealed this latter injunction, and they were successful in getting this injunction lifted on December 2, 2013. However, Grupo
México did not appeal the November 27, 2013 injunction. Nonetheless, the Extraordinary Shareholders meeting did take place, in contravention of the court orders issued in respect of the amparo proceedings. On
February 21, 2014, a Mexican federal final court of appeals declared as fully null and void the shareholders meeting that took place on December 3, 2013; as a result, all resolutions approved at this meeting were similarly declared
null and void. This resolution is definitive and not appealable.

Ejido Participants at Tijuana, Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta Airports

A portion of the lands comprising some of our airports were expropriated by the Mexican government pursuant to its power of eminent domain.
Prior to their expropriation, some of these lands had been held by groups of individuals through a system of communal ownership of rural land known as an ejido. Certain of these former ejidos participants have asserted indemnity
claims against the Mexican government challenging the expropriation decrees.

In the case of the Tijuana airport, our airport subsidiary
has been joined in the proceedings challenging the 1970 expropriation decree, but only as an interested third party. During 2008, the ejido received an unfavorable ruling, which it appealed, and subsequently, it received a judgment in its
favor. The current judgment calls for the restitution of 320 hectares of land, although the precise area affected has yet to be determined. Depending on which particular land parcel is to be returned, this could affect the airports perimeter
and could materially disrupt the airports current operations.



139



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition, certain of the former ejido participants are currently occupying portions of
the property on which we operate Tijuana International Airport that are not at present essential to the airports operations. Although these people are not currently interfering with the airports operations, their presence could limit our
ability to expand the airport into the areas they occupy. In addition, there can be no assurance that the former ejido participants will not seek to disrupt the airports operations if their legal claims against the Mexican government
are not resolved to their satisfaction.

Similarly, in the case of the Guadalajara International Airport, two different ejidos
commenced proceedings before an agrarian court (tribunal superior agrario) in 2009 against the Ministry of Communications and Transportation seeking to void the expropriation decree of 1975. In November 2010, the Third District Court for
Administrative Matters and Labor found in favor of the ejidos. The ruling ordered the return of all expropriated property to the ejidos and declared as null and void the concession granted to us in 1998 specifically with respect to the
land expropriated by the 1975 decree. Although our Guadalajara airport has been joined only as an interested third party in the proceedings, we appealed the decision on November 10, 2011. On July 10, 2012, the court overturned the decision
and remanded the proceedings in order to collect more material evidence. As of the date of this report, a final decision is still pending. In addition, on February 10, 2014, our Guadalajara airport received a notice from the agrarian court
before which the ejido San José del Valle proceeding is pending, claiming approximately five hectares of the property comprising the airport area. While the initial hearing date was originally set for February 20, 2014, it has
been postponed to May 15, 2014.

In September 2013, the Puerto Vallarta International Airport received three notifications of
lawsuits related to the ejido Valle de Banderas, which claimed the invalidity of the expropriation by the Mexican Government of the land on which the airport is located. Participants of the ejido commenced three proceedings against us,
the Puerto Vallarta Airport and various federal authorities for restitution or compensation in respect of 154 hectares of land comprising this airport. The claimants seek, among other things, to invalidate the expropriation decree issued on
October 9, 1957 and, in two of the proceedings, are also seeking restitution of the land as they were not part of the expropriation decrees of October 9, 1957, August 20, 1990, November 24, 1993 and April 24, 1997.
These lawsuits, are also seeking to, in part, void the concession granted to the airport. We attended the initial appointment on October 8, 2013, at which we obtained a deferral until December 2, 2013 due to the lack of formal notice. The
proceeding was further delayed until January 24, 2014, at which time, the ejido ratified its demands. This proceeding is still ongoing.

The terms of our concession require the Mexican government to provide us restitution for any loss of our use of the land provided for in our
concessions. Although no assurance can be given, we believe that the Mexican government would be liable for any operational disruption caused by the proceedings with the ejidos and would have to restore our rights of use for the public
property assigned to us under the concessions if we were to lose our appeals.

Proceedings before the Mexican Tax Authority regarding asset tax

On December 31, 2003, we commenced two administrative proceedings before the Mexican Tax Authority seeking: (i) a reduction
of the asset basis of, or the applicable rate for purposes of calculating asset tax liability on, our airport concessions, so that such base only includes 15% of the concession value; and (ii) an increase of the recovery period of any asset tax
paid. Both proceedings seek to reduce our effective tax rate. Based on the advice of our tax advisors, our board of directors agreed during its meeting on April 29, 2004 to commence legal proceedings if the Mexican Tax Authority rejected our
position. The Mexican Tax Authority eventually rejected our position, and we commenced proceedings in Mexican Federal Tax Court. In 2005, the tax court ruled that the Mexican Tax Authority to accept our method of calculating the asset tax base or
grant us a specific tax benefit. The Mexican Tax Authority appealed this decision in federal court.



140



---

##### Table of Contents

On May 12, 2006, the federal court with jurisdiction over six of our airports declared the
appeal by the Mexican Tax Authority unfounded, finding that it was correct to base the asset tax applicable with respect to the Aguascalientes, Hermosillo, La Paz, Los Mochis, Morelia and Manzanillo airports only on 15% of the value of the
concessions at those airports as requested by us (equivalent to AMPs pro rata interest in those concessions as a result of AMPs 15% interest in us). As a result of this resolution, on August 29, 2006, the Mexican Tax Authority
issued a notice confirming this methodology for those airports. On September 1, 2006, the federal court with jurisdiction over our Guadalajara, Mexicali, Guanajuato, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Tijuana airports reached the same favorable
decision; however, the Mexican Tax Authority appealed that decision.

As a result of the federal court decision and the final notice
delivered to us by the Mexican Tax Authority with respect to our Aguascalientes, Hermosillo, La Paz, Los Mochis, Morelia and Manzanillo airports, in the last quarter of 2006 we recorded the effect of that decision, which resulted in an overall
benefit of Ps. 208.6 million and which was recognized in the income statement as a reduction of the valuation allowance (see Note 14 of our audited consolidated financial statements). From 2007 to 2010, we received a refund of Ps. 158.5
million related to these airports, although Ps. 24.3 million were denied by the Mexican Tax Authority. This decision was appealed by us without a favorable outcome; therefore, there remains a pending balance of Ps. 25.8 million. At
December 31, 2013, the balances in aggregate for all six airports were: (i) asset taxes of Ps. 51.9 million; and (ii) a valuation allowance of Ps. 26.1 million, representing the amount which we do not expect to recover.

In 2007, we petitioned the Mexican Tax Authority for a refund of the remaining taxes and interest we had overpaid with respect to the
airports at Aguascalientes, Hermosillo, La Paz, Los Mochis, Morelia and Manzanillo for the period between 2002 and 2006. The Mexican Tax Authority refused to refund certain outstanding amounts that we had previously paid for five airports.
Consequently, we filed a claim to recover the amounts refused by the authorities.

During 2009, the La Paz International Airport was
refunded the amount it claimed, but the Manzanillo International Airport and the Morelia International Airport received an unfavorable resolution in the ultimate instance, denying their request to recover the asset taxes previously paid from the
period from January to May 2003. As of December 31, 2009, the amount of Ps. 9.0 million was eliminated from our accounts receivable and instead is accounted for in the tax line of the profit and loss statement. In January 2010, the Los
Mochis International Airport received a refund for the recoverable tax in the amount of Ps. 25.6 million (including penalties and interest). In September 2010, the Aguascalientes International Airport received a refund for the recoverable tax
in the amount of Ps. 1.0 million (including interest).

On January 22, 2010, the Hermosillo International Airport filed a
judicial annulment against the unfavorable court resolution that denied the recovery of the asset tax from the years 2005 and 2006. On October 25, 2013, we received favorable resolution; however the authority filed an appeal, which is pending
resolution. The amount that remains pending is Ps. 27.3 million.

On June 5, 2009, our other six airports, the Guanajuato,
Guadalajara, Mexicali, Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta and Tijuana international airports received favorable resolutions in the second instance, allowing them to apply an asset tax base of only 15% of the value of the concessions, which represents the
amount paid by AMP. The effect of this resolution was to force the lower court to review the case using the applicable tax laws. However, on May 20 and 24, 2011, we received certain resolutions related to a ruling issued on June 5, 2009.
In these resolutions, the tax authority concluded that the airports have to calculate the asset tax base considering 100% of the assets utilized as part of their operations. Our management believes that these conclusions are based on improper
arguments related to ownership percentages and apply tax consolidation rules that are not applicable to our airports. There are no additional instances to appeal this resolution. Based on the advice of certain of our external legal advisors, we do
not believe that there are sufficient bases on which to recover the amounts paid and have therefore not recognized assets for such amounts in our audited consolidated statement of financial position.



141



---

##### Table of Contents

Property tax claims by certain municipalities

We remain subject to ongoing property tax claims that have been asserted against us by the municipal authorities of Mexicali, Tijuana,
Guadalajara, Hermosillo and Manzanillo for the payment of property taxes with respect to the property on which we operate our airports in those cities.

The municipality of Hermosillo has initiated efforts to survey the area of our Hermosillo airport in order to determine the amount of property
taxes owed. We challenged their actions through administrative proceedings filed on July 30, 2013, October 16, 2013 and January 13, 2014. As of the date of this report, we have not received a decision in these proceedings.

On May 19, 2010, the municipality of Tlajomulco, the municipality in which our Guadalajara airport is located, delivered a notice to the
airport in which it seeks payment of property taxes. The notice, however, was factually inaccurate with respect to a number of items including ownership of the property. As a result, the proceeding was properly commenced, and no further action on
our part is needed at this time.

In the case of the Tijuana airport, the municipal authority issued a second property tax claim against
the airport on June 8, 2005. The court then ordered the temporary encumbrance of certain of our assets, including our concession to operate the Tijuana International Airport, pending our deposit of a bond with the court as provisional security,
in accordance with Mexican judicial procedures, while we await the final resolution of the underlying claims. Although the encumbered assets did not affect the operation of the airport, on February 9, 2006, a bond was issued by a financial
institution on behalf of the Tijuana airport for Ps. 141.8 million (nominal pesos) in order to release the encumbrance. On March 25, 2008, the Tijuana airport received an initial ruling declaring null and void the tax claim by the
municipal authority but upholding the right of the municipal authorities to assess property taxes over commercial areas. Although we appealed the ruling with respect to the assessment of property taxes over commercial areas, we also petitioned that
the bond be refunded in the interim because the municipality did not appeal any matter in the resolution. Accordingly, on February 7, 2009, our line of credit for the issuance of the bond was cancelled. Our challenge to the second request is
still pending. On October 20, 2010, the municipal authority of Tijuana issued a third request for the repayment of property taxes for 2000 through 2010. We and our legal counsel believe that this request for payment of taxes is not valid since
local courts had already ruled the tax claims for the years 2005 and 2006 invalid. In conjunction with its third request, the Tijuana municipal authority requested that we make a full payment of the claimed taxes of Ps. 269.2 million within
three days of receiving the request. The municipal authority also listed a number of assets that they believed could be seized if payment was not made. Because we and our legal counsel believe that this request for repayment is also invalid, we
commenced legal proceedings against the municipal authority. The legal proceeding is currently pending. On February 7, 2013, the Tijuana municipal authority filed a fourth property tax claim for the period from 2008 to 2012 against the Tijuana
airport in the amount of Ps. 15.2 million, demanding payment within three business days. On February 28, 2013, we began an annulment proceeding against the claim. On March 5, 2013 the authority established the amount to be guaranteed,
and on March 8, 2013 we presented a bond to guarantee the amount claimed. This legal proceeding is also currently pending.

On
February 21, 2013, the Mexicali municipal authority once again filed a property tax claim for the 2008-2012 period against the Mexicali airport in the amount of Ps. 0.3 million, demanding payment within three business days. We filed an
annulment against this claim on March 12, 2013, where we presented a bond to guarantee this amount. This legal proceeding is also currently pending.



142



---

##### Table of Contents

On February 26, 2013, municipal government of Manzanillo made certain inquiries and
requested certain documents regarding the Manzanillo airport and its operation, in connection with their calculation of property taxes owed for commercial areas and the parking lot for the past five years. On March 20, 2013, the Manzanillo
airport filed a lawsuit against the municipal governments actions. As of the date of this report, this legal proceeding is pending, and we have not received any requirement for payment.

We do not believe that liabilities related to any claims or proceedings against us are likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations because, should a court determine that these property taxes must be paid in response to any future proceedings.

Federal tax proceedings against La Paz, Morelia and Los Mochis airports

The Mexican Tax Authority (Servicio de Administración Tributaria, or SAT), in connection with its review for the 2005
year, sent us official notices in 2008 and 2009 stating that under its criteria the La Paz, Morelia and Los Mochis airports, among others, incorrectly applied the fiscal amortization rates with regard to the value of their concessions.

On February 12, 2010, the Morelia International Airport filed an administrative proceeding against the resolution issued by the tax
authority that establishes that the Morelia International Airport applied a fiscal amortization rate in excess of its concession value. In August 2010, the tax authority required payment of the back taxes and ordered a temporary encumbrance of some
of our assets to guarantee payment of any potential amounts owed. We paid a fine and secured a bond to guarantee the back taxes in order to avoid the temporary encumbrance. On October 5, 2011, the Morelia airport received an unfavorable ruling;
therefore, on October 26, 2011, it filed an appeal on constitutional grounds against that unfavorable decision, which was partially ruled in favor of the airport in September 2012. Subsequently, the tax authority filed an appeal against this
decision, which was resolved negatively for the airport on February 28, 2013. Accordingly, on March 14, 2013, we paid Ps. 2.9 million to the authority, after which this proceeding was concluded.

On October 3, 2011, the La Paz International Airport received a favorable decision in the first instance, which was appealed by the tax
authority. On September 7, 2012, the Court issued a resolution in favor of the tax authority and remanded the case to the lower court with instructions to modify its decision based on the applicable law in 2005. On November 14, 2012, the
lower court found in favor of the tax authority regarding the income tax, but found in favor of the airport, and found the fine to be invalid. The tax authority appealed the resolution about the fine. In February 2013, the La Paz airport paid the
corresponding taxes according to the last resolution. In January 21, 2014, we received confirmation by the Court that the fine is invalid.

On October 3, 2011, the Los Mochis International Airport filed an appeal of the tax authority resolution establishing a fiscal
amortization rate lower than we believe is applicable, which was concluded unfavorably for the airport in July 2012. As a result, the airport filed a legal proceeding in August 2012, which was denied in June 2013. As a result, this proceeding has
concluded. We made the necessary tax adjustments, which has no impact on our results.

Renewal of Hotel Lease at Guadalajara International Airport

Coco Club was granted the right by the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency to operate the following commercial space at our
Guadalajara International Airport in exchange for the construction and remodeling of certain commercial areas and infrastructure at the airport, including the hotel itself. In September 1998, Coco Club transferred all of these rights to a
third party, except for its right to operate the hotel for a period of 15 years from March 1993, in exchange for its obligation to



143



---

##### Table of Contents

construct such hotel. In May 2004, we recovered the right to operate the commercial areas previously operated by the third party that received its rights from Coco Club. Subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions, under the lease to operate the hotel, Coco Club was granted the right to renew the contract and continue operating the hotel for another 15-year period from March 2008 at below-market rates. Because we do not
believe that Coco Club satisfied all such conditions, we did not renew the lease to operate the hotel. As a result, in April 2008 we initiated legal proceedings against Coco Club to declare the lease null and void due to Coco Clubs failure to
satisfy all the conditions in the prior lease agreement. On October 31, 2011, we received a favorable decision for the return of the hotel to the airport. The decision was appealed by Coco Club on December 14, 2011. On October 19,
2012, the court ordered the eviction of Coco Club and instructed the airport to take possession of the hotel. However, on November 9, 2012, we were notified of a federal lawsuit filed by the operator of the hotel. Although we are in the process
of taking the necessary steps to repossess the hotel, we will not be able to take possession of the hotel until this new proceeding is concluded.

Infractions of the Mexican Securities Law alleged by the CNBV

On April 25, 2011, we received a formal notice from the CNBV by which it initiated a proceeding against us for alleged violations of
Mexican disclosure statutes primarily in connection with disputes among AMPs shareholders during 2010.

This notice was the first
stage of an administrative proceeding required to impose a fine on us. On June 3, 2011, we exercised our right to appeal the determination of the CNBV and to file evidence to contest this determination.

On April 24, 2013, we were notified by the CNBV of the imposition of administrative sanctions for the alleged violations. We appealed the
sanctions by means of an administrative proceeding before the Fiscal Federal and Administrative Justice Court on June 27, 2013. This appeal is pending.

We can provide no assurances as to what, if any, additional actions the CNBV may take as part of the administrative proceeding. Nor can we
provide assurances that we will be successful in any subsequent legal actions we may take in response to the CNBV. If we are not successful in any subsequent legal actions that we may take, the maximum amount of the fine that could be levied against
us for all alleged violations is approximately Ps. 31.1 million (approximately U.S. 2.4 million).

DIVIDENDS

The declaration, amount and payment of dividends are determined by a majority vote of our shareholders present at a shareholders meeting
and generally, but not necessarily, on the recommendation of the board of directors, which is empowered by Article 18 of our bylaws to set our dividend policies. So long as the Series BB shares represent at least 7.65% of our outstanding
capital stock, the declaration and payment of dividends will require the approval of the holders of a majority of the Series BB shares.

Mexican law requires that at least 5% of a companys net income each year (after profit sharing and other deductions required by Mexican
law) be allocated to a legal reserve fund until such fund reaches an amount equal to at least 20% of the companys capital stock from time to time (without adjustment for inflation). Our legal reserve fund was Ps. 635.9 million (historical
value) at December 31, 2013 (excluding reserve amounts corresponding to 2013 net income).

Mexican companies may pay dividends only
out of earnings (including retained earnings after all losses have been absorbed or paid up) and only after such allocation to the legal reserve fund. The reserve fund is required to be funded on a stand-alone basis for each company, rather than on
a consolidated basis. The level of earnings available for the payment of dividends is determined under MFRS. Our subsidiaries, which prepare and report financial information under MFRS, are required to allocate earnings to their respective legal
reserve funds prior to paying dividends to Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. We are also required to allocate earnings to our legal reserve fund prior to distributing any dividend payments to our shareholders.



144



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2013, dividends paid to non-resident holders with respect to our Series B shares and
ADSs were not subject to Mexican withholding tax. However, due to the 2014 Fiscal Reform and thereafter, dividends paid to Mexican individuals or any foreign residents are subject to a 10% withholding tax.

The definition of dividend for this purpose includes, among others, in addition to declared dividends: (1) interest paid on preferred
shares; (2) loans to shareholders and partners unless the loan is established for less than one year, incurred in the operations of the business and meets certain requirements; (3) payments that are considered non-deductible and benefit
the shareholders; (4) amounts not recognized as a result of omissions of income or unrealized purchases; and (5) transfer pricing adjustments to income or expenses as a result of assessments by the tax authorities for related party
transactions. The 10% distribution tax would also apply on distributions from a branch to the home office. A transitory provision limits the withholding tax on dividends to earnings generated in 2014 and subsequent years. For this purpose, the
transitory provision refers to distributions from accumulated previously taxed earnings (CUFIN) as of 2013, being free of tax. Taxpayers will be required to maintain a separate CUFIN account for earnings after 2013. Because this withholding tax
would be a tax on the shareholders under the Mexican Income Tax Law, treaty benefits should be available.

Dividends that are paid from a
companys distributable earnings that have not been subject to corporate income tax will be subject to a corporate-level dividend tax (retained against cumulative net income and payable by us) calculated on a gross-up basis by applying a factor
of 1.4286 for 2013 and subsequent years. For 2013 and thereafter, the corporate tax rate is 30%. This corporate-level dividend income tax on the distribution of earnings may be applied as a credit against Mexican corporate income tax corresponding
to the fiscal year in which the dividend was paid or against the Mexican corporate income tax of the two fiscal years following the date on which the dividend was paid.

Distributions made by us to our shareholders other than as dividends (in the manner described above), including capital reductions,
amortization of shares or otherwise, would be subject to taxation in Mexico, including withholding taxes. The tax rates applicable and the method of assessing and paying taxes applicable to any such non-dividend distributions will vary depending on
the nature of the distributions.

We paid aggregate dividends of Ps. 1.04 billion in 2011, Ps. 1.13 billion in 2012 and Ps. 1.21
billion in 2013.

Under our dividend policy adopted at the General Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 15, 2005,
our annual dividend is expected to consist of two components. The first component is a fixed amount, which was Ps. 450 million for 2005 (for the dividend paid in 2006) and is intended to increase gradually in future years. Second, the
dividend policy contemplates that our annual dividend will include any cash and cash equivalents we hold (as reflected in our balance sheet as of the month-end prior to the dividend payment, after deducting the fixed component) in excess of our
minimum cash balance. For purposes of our policy, the minimum cash balance is the amount of cash and cash equivalents that our board of directors determines is necessary to cover the minimum amount of expenses and investments
expected to be incurred in the fiscal year during which the dividend payment is made and the subsequent fiscal year. Dividends are expected to be made payable in cash and in one or more payments as determined in the relevant general ordinary
shareholders meeting approving dividends.



145



---

##### Table of Contents

The declaration, amount and payment of dividends pursuant to the policy described above
are subject to; (i) compliance with applicable law regarding the declaration and payment of dividends with respect to any year including the establishment of the statutory legal reserve fund; and (ii) the absence of any adverse effect on
our business plan for the current or subsequent fiscal year as a result of the payment of any dividend. We cannot provide assurance that we will continue to pay dividends or that future dividends will be comparable to our previous dividends. Our
ability to pay dividends may be restricted under the unsecured peso-denominated credit agreements with Banamex, HSBC and BBVA, to which some of our operating subsidiaries are parties. See Item 5, Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects  Liquidity and Capital Resources. Our dividend policy may also be amended at any time by our shareholders.

As of December 31, 2013, we had accumulated approximately Ps. 1.7 billion of distributable earnings that had been subject to the
corporate income tax and that could be declared at the relevant shareholders meeting and paid to shareholders free of the corporate level dividend tax.

We pay dividends in pesos. In the case of Series B shares represented by ADSs, the cash dividends are paid to the depositary and, subject
to the terms of the Deposit Agreement, converted into and paid in U.S. dollars at the prevailing rate of exchange, net of conversion expenses of the depositary and applicable Mexican withholding tax. Fluctuations in exchange rates will affect the
amount of dividends that ADS holders receive.



|Item 9. | The Offer and Listing
|------- | ---------------------

STOCK PRICE HISTORY

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for (i) the ADSs on the New York Stock
Exchange in U.S. dollars; and (ii) our common shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange in pesos. See Item 3, Key Information  Exchange Rates for the exchange rates applicable during the periods set forth below. The
information set forth in the table below reflects actual historical amounts at the trade dates and has not been restated in constant pesos.



|               |  |                  |       |  |                          |  |       |     |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|-------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----- | --- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|Year ended     |  | U.S.$ per ADR(1) |       |  | Pesos per Series B Share | 
|December 31,   |  | Low              |       |  | High                     |  |       | Low |  |  | High  | 
|2008           |  |                  | 15.42 |  |                          |  | 48.92 |     |  |  | 21.08 |  |  |  | 52.45 | 
|2009           |  |                  | 13.95 |  |                          |  | 32.68 |     |  |  | 21.57 |  |  |  | 42.23 | 
|2010           |  |                  | 28.18 |  |                          |  | 41.99 |     |  |  | 37.07 |  |  |  | 51.00 | 
|               |  |                 
|Year ended     |  | U.S.$ per ADR(1) |       |  | Pesos per Series B Share | 
|December 31,   |  | Low              |       |  | High                     |  |       | Low |  |  | High  | 
|2011           |  |                  | 32.18 |  |                          |  | 42.72 |     |  |  | 44.80 |  |  |  | 51.13 | 
|First Quarter  |  |                  | 36.92 |  |                          |  | 42.49 |     |  |  | 44.85 |  |  |  | 51.13 | 
|Second Quarter |  |                  | 39.43 |  |                          |  | 42.72 |     |  |  | 46.25 |  |  |  | 50.51 | 
|Third Quarter  |  |                  | 33.21 |  |                          |  | 41.08 |     |  |  | 45.64 |  |  |  | 48.44 | 
|Fourth Quarter |  |                  | 32.18 |  |                          |  | 35.66 |     |  |  | 44.80 |  |  |  | 47.90 | 
|               |  |                 
|Year ended     |  | U.S.$ per ADR(1) |       |  | Pesos per Series B Share | 
|December 31,   |  | Low              |       |  | High                     |  |       | Low |  |  | High  | 
|2012           |  |                  | 34.13 |  |                          |  | 62.58 |     |  |  | 44.00 |  |  |  | 74.70 | 
|First Quarter  |  |                  | 34.51 |  |                          |  | 39.23 |     |  |  | 46.77 |  |  |  | 51.00 | 
|Second Quarter |  |                  | 34.13 |  |                          |  | 40.41 |     |  |  | 44.00 |  |  |  | 53.10 | 
|Third Quarter  |  |                  | 34.87 |  |                          |  | 43.62 |     |  |  | 49.59 |  |  |  | 55.00 | 
|Fourth Quarter |  |                  | 41.77 |  |                          |  | 62.58 |     |  |  | 51.43 |  |  |  | 74.70 | 



146



---

##### Table of Contents

|               |  |                  |       |  |                          |  |       |     |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|-------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----- | --- |  |  | ----- |  |  |  | ----- | 
|Year ended     |  | U.S.$ per ADR(1) |       |  | Pesos per Series B Share | 
|December 31,   |  | Low              |       |  | High                     |  |       | Low |  |  | High  | 
|2013           |  |                  | 42.55 |  |                          |  | 65.95 |     |  |  | 56.61 |  |  |  | 80.76 | 
|First Quarter  |  |                  | 54.22 |  |                          |  | 64.16 |     |  |  | 67.53 |  |  |  | 81.70 | 
|Second Quarter |  |                  | 41.45 |  |                          |  | 66.19 |     |  |  | 55.41 |  |  |  | 80.40 | 
|Third Quarter  |  |                  | 48.01 |  |                          |  | 58.80 |     |  |  | 61.49 |  |  |  | 75.06 | 
|Fourth Quarter |  |                  | 48.74 |  |                          |  | 54.57 |     |  |  | 63.36 |  |  |  | 70.63 | 
|               |  |                 
|               |  | U.S.$ per ADR(1) |       |  | Pesos per Series B Share | 
|               |  | Low              |       |  | High                     |  |       | Low |  |  | High  | 
|Monthly Prices |  |                  |       |  |                          |  |       |     |  |  |       |  |  |  |       | 
|November 2013  |  |                  | 46.61 |  |                          |  | 53.28 |     |  |  | 60.45 |  |  |  | 69.30 | 
|December 2013  |  |                  | 51.21 |  |                          |  | 54.57 |     |  |  | 66.81 |  |  |  | 70.63 | 
|January 2014   |  |                  | 48.65 |  |                          |  | 55.48 |     |  |  | 63.37 |  |  |  | 72.80 | 
|February 2014  |  |                  | 51.88 |  |                          |  | 54.04 |     |  |  | 68.86 |  |  |  | 72.21 | 
|March 2014     |  |                  | 51.81 |  |                          |  | 58.51 |     |  |  | 68.91 |  |  |  | 76.39 | 
|April 2014(2)  |  |                  | 57.35 |  |                          |  | 59.33 |     |  |  | 73.93 |  |  |  | 76.76 | 



|(1) | 10 Series B shares per ADR.
|--- | ---------------------------

|(2) | As of April 14, 2014.
|--- | ---------------------

TRADING ON THE MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

The Mexican Stock Exchange, located in Mexico City, is the only stock exchange in Mexico. Founded in 1894 and in continuous operations
since 1907, the Mexican Stock Exchange is organized as a Mexican corporation (sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable) operating under a concession granted by the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP). Securities
trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange occurs each business day from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Mexico City time.

Since
January 1999, all trading on the Mexican Stock Exchange has been effected electronically. The Mexican Stock Exchange may impose a number of measures to promote orderly and transparent trading in securities, including the operation of a system
of automatic suspension of trading in shares of a particular issuer when price fluctuation exceeds certain limits. The Mexican Stock Exchange may also suspend trading in shares of a particular issuer as a result of:



| |  |  | non-disclosure of material events; or
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the offer or demand, volume traded, or prevailing share price that are inconsistent with the shares historical performance and cannot be explained through publicly available information.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Mexican Stock Exchange may reinstate trading in suspended shares when it deems that the material events have been
adequately disclosed to public investors or when it deems that the issuer has adequately explained the reasons for the changes in offer and demand, volume traded, or prevailing share price. Under current regulations, the Mexican Stock Exchange may
consider the measures adopted by the other stock exchanges in order to suspend and/or resume trading in an issuers shares in cases where the relevant securities are simultaneously traded on a stock exchange outside of Mexico.



147



---

##### Table of Contents

Settlement on the Mexican Stock Exchange is effected three business days after a share
transaction. Deferred settlement is not permitted without the approval of the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, even where mutually agreed. Most securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange are on deposit with the S.D.
Indeval, S.A. de C.V. Institución para el Depósito de Valores, or Indeval, a privately owned securities depositary that acts as a clearinghouse, depositary, and custodian, as well as a settlement, transfer, and registration agent
for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions, eliminating the need for physical transfer of securities.



|Item 10. | Additional Information
|-------- | ----------------------

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Organization and Register

Grupo
Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a corporation (sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable) organized under the laws of Mexico under the Mexican Companies Law (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles)
and the Mexican Securities Market Law. It is registered with the Public Registry of Commerce of Mexico City under the number 238,578.

Purpose

Our main corporate purpose is to operate airports pursuant to 12 airport concessions.

Bylaws

This section summarizes certain
provisions of Mexican law and our estatutos sociales (bylaws).

At our Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on
October 27, 2006, our shareholders adopted resolutions amending and restating of our bylaws to organize the company as a sociedad anónima bursátil (a form newly required by law for publicly traded companies in Mexico), and
to conform our bylaws to the provisions of the new Securities Market Law. Many of the changes related to the enhancement of our corporate governance.

During 2010, our Audit Committee proposed, to our board of directors, an amendment to our bylaws relating to the Corporate Practices articles
(Practicas Societarias as described in the Mexican Securities Market Law) in order to more closely align our bylaws with the terms of the Mexican Securities Market Law with respect to Corporate Practices. After reviewing the amendment
proposal, our board of directors instructed the Audit Committee to submit the proposal to the CNBV to obtain their opinion regarding how the amended articles compared with the Mexican Securities Market Law, specifically as it relates to Corporate
Practices. In response, the CNBV provided their recommendations both with respect to the specific consultation as well as with respect to other articles contained in the proposed amendment. We accepted the CNBVs recommendations and
re-submitted the proposed amendments to the CNBV. As of the date of this report, we have not received a response from the CNBV.

Board of
Directors

Our bylaws provide that our board of directors will generally have 11 members (increasing to 12 or 13 members only when
necessary to preserve minority shareholders voting rights in cases of multiple appointments by persons with 10% interests (as described below)).

At each shareholders meeting for the election of directors, the holders of Series BB shares are entitled to elect four directors.
The remaining members of the board of directors are to be elected by the holders of the Series B shares.



148



---

##### Table of Contents

Each person (or group of persons acting together) holding 10% of our capital stock in the form of
Series B shares is entitled to appoint one director. The remaining positions on the board of directors will be filled based on the vote of all holders of Series B shares that have not elected to appoint a director by virtue of owning 10%
of our capital stock. The candidates to be considered for election as directors by the Series B shareholders are proposed to the shareholders by the Nominations and Compensation Committee. All directors are elected based on a simple majority of
the votes cast at the relevant shareholders meeting. Our bylaws do not currently require mandatory retirement of directors after they reach a certain age. The compensation of our directors is proposed by the Nominations and Compensation
Committee to all of our shareholders at shareholders meetings for their approval. Pursuant to the Securities Market Law, 25% of our directors must be independent within the definition of that term specified therein.

Authority of the Board of Directors

The board of directors is our legal representative. The powers of the board include, among others, the following:



| |  |  | to define our strategic planning decisions and approve our annual business plans and investment budgets,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to approve our Master Development Programs and modifications thereto,
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to call shareholders meetings and act upon shareholders resolutions, and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to create special committees and grant them the powers and authority as it sees fit, provided that said committees will not be vested with the authorities which by law or under our bylaws are expressly reserved for the
shareholders or the board of directors.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meetings of the board of directors will be validly convened and held if a majority
of the members are present. Resolutions at said meetings will be valid if approved by a majority of the members of the board of directors, unless our bylaws require a higher number. Notwithstanding the boards authority, under general
principles of Mexican law, our shareholders, pursuant to a decision validly taken at a shareholders meeting, may at any time override the board.

Powers of Series BB Directors

The Series BB directors are entitled to: (i) appoint and remove our chief executive officer and our other top-level executive
officers (upon consultation with our Nominations and Compensation Committee), (ii) appoint three members of the Operating Committee and their respective alternates, (iii) appoint 20% of the total members of the Audit Committee, the
Acquisitions Committee and the Nominations and Compensation Committee (a minimum of one member per committee), and their respective alternatives and (iv) consent to the appointment of individuals appointed to the Operating Committee who are not
members of our board of directors or our officers.

In addition to the foregoing, each of the following actions of our board of directors,
among certain others, may only occur with the approval of the Series BB directors:



| |  |  | approval of our airports five-year Master Development Programs or amendments thereto;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval of our annual business and investment plans;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval of capital expenditures outside of our annual investment plans;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



149



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | approval of any sale of our fixed assets, individually or jointly, in an amount exceeding U.S$3.0 million;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval for us to enter into any type of loan or credit agreement, other than for certain loans granted by us to our subsidiaries;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval of the granting by us of guarantees (avales) or other security interests other than for the benefit of our subsidiaries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | proposing to increase our capital stock or that of our subsidiaries;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval of sales of shares in our subsidiaries;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | approval of our dividend policies; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | proposing individuals to join our Audit Committee or our Nominations and Compensation Committee.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our
Capital Stock

The following table sets forth our authorized capital stock and our issued and outstanding capital stock as of
April 10, 2014:

Capital Stock



|                 |  |            |             |  |                       |  |             | 
|---------------- |  | ---------- | ----------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------- | 
|                 |  | Authorized |             |  | Issued andoutstanding | 
|Capital stock:   |  |            |             |  |                       |  |             | 
|Series B shares  |  |            | 476,850,000 |  |                       |  | 476,850,000 | 
|Series BB shares |  |            | 84,150,000  |  |                       |  | 84,150,000  | 
|Total            |  |            | 561,000,000 |  |                       |  | 561,000,000 | 

All ordinary shares confer equal rights and obligations to holders within each series. The Series BB shares have the
voting and other rights described below.

Our bylaws provide that our shares have the following characteristics:



| |  |  | Series B: Series B shares currently represent 85% of our capital, and may represent up to 100% of our share capital. Series B shares may be held by any Mexican or foreign natural person, company or
entity, except for foreign governments.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Series BB: Series BB shares currently represent 15% of our capital and may not represent a greater percentage of our share capital. Like Series B shares, Series BB shares may be held by any Mexican
or foreign natural person, company or entity, except for foreign governments and subject to the other requirements of our bylaws.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Under the Mexican Airport Law and the Mexican Foreign Investments Law (Ley de Inversión Extranjera), foreign persons may not
directly or indirectly own more than 49% of the capital stock of a holder of an airport concession unless an authorization from the Mexican Commission of Foreign Investments is obtained. We have obtained this authorization, and as a consequence
these restrictions do not apply to our Series B or Series BB shares.



150



---

##### Table of Contents

Series BB shares are subject to transfer restrictions under our bylaws and generally must be
converted to Series B shares before they can be transferred. Up to 49% of the Series BB shares can be converted into Series B shares at any time. The remaining 51% of Series BB shares could not be converted into Series B
shares before August 25, 2009 absent prior approval by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation. Thereafter and until August 25, 2014, one fifth of such 51% may be converted each year. On or after August 25, 2014, all of the
Series BB shares may be converted into Series B shares if (i) the Technical Assistance Agreement between AMP and us has not been renewed; and (ii) the Series BB shareholders so request. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at
any time after August 25, 2014, Series BB shares represent less than 7.65% of our share capital, those shares will be mandatorily converted into Series B shares and the Technical Assistance Agreement will be terminated.

Voting Rights and Shareholders Meetings

Each Series B share and Series BB share entitles the holder to one vote at any general meeting of our shareholders. Holders of
Series BB shares are entitled to elect four members of our board of directors and holders of Series B shares are entitled to elect the remaining members of the board of directors.

Under Mexican law and our bylaws, we may hold three types of shareholders meetings: ordinary, extraordinary, and special. Ordinary
shareholders meetings are those called to discuss any issue not reserved for extraordinary shareholders meeting. An annual ordinary shareholders meeting (our annual general meeting) must be convened and held within the first four
months following the end of each fiscal year to discuss, among other things, the report prepared by the board on our financial statements, the appointment of members of the board of directors, the declaration of dividends and the determination of
compensation for members of the board.

Extraordinary shareholders meetings are those called to consider any of the following
matters:



| |  |  | the extension of our duration or our voluntary dissolution;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an increase or decrease in our minimum fixed capital;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a change in corporate purpose or nationality;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any transformation, merger or spin-off involving the company;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any stock redemption or issuance of preferred stock or bonds;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the cancellation of the listing of our shares with the National Securities Registry or on any stock exchange;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amendments to our companys bylaws; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | any other matters for which applicable Mexican law or the bylaws specifically require an extraordinary meeting.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special shareholders meetings are those called and held by shareholders of the same series or class to consider any matter particularly
affecting the relevant series or class of shares.

Shareholders meetings are required to be held in our corporate domicile, which is
Mexico City. Calls for shareholders meetings must be made by the board of directors or the Audit Committee. Any shareholder or group of shareholders representing at least 10% of our capital stock has the right to request that the board of
directors or the Audit Committee call a shareholders meeting to discuss the matters



151



---

##### Table of Contents

indicated in the relevant request. In certain circumstances specified in Mexican law, any individual shareholder may also make such a request. If the board of directors or the Audit Committee
fails to call a meeting within 15 calendar days following receipt of the request, the shareholder or group of shareholders may request that the call be made by a competent court.

Calls for shareholders meetings must be published in the Mexican Federal Gazette or in one newspaper of general circulation in Mexico at
least 15 calendar days prior to the date of the meeting. Each call must set forth the place, date and time of the meeting and the matters to be addressed. Shareholders meetings will be validly held and convened without the need for a prior
call or publication whenever all the shares representing our capital are duly represented.

To be admitted to any shareholders
meeting, shareholders must be registered in our share registry and comply with the requirements set forth in our bylaws. Shareholders may be represented at any shareholders meeting by one or more attorneys-in-fact who may not be our directors.

At or prior to the time of the publication of any call for a shareholders meeting, we will provide copies of the publication to the
depositary for distribution to the holders of ADSs. Holders of ADSs are entitled to instruct the depositary as to the exercise of voting rights pertaining to the Series B shares.

Quorums

Ordinary
meetings are regarded as legally convened pursuant to a first call when more than 50% of the shares representing our capital are present or duly represented. Resolutions at ordinary meetings of shareholders are valid when approved by a majority of
the shares present or duly represented at the meeting. Any number of shares represented at an ordinary meeting of shareholders convened pursuant to a second or subsequent call constitutes a quorum. Resolutions at ordinary meetings of shareholders
convened in this manner are valid when approved by a majority of the shares represented at the meeting.

Extraordinary and special
shareholders meetings are regarded as legally convened pursuant to a first or subsequent call when at least 75% of the shares representing our capital (or 75% of the relevant series) are present or duly represented. Resolutions at
extraordinary meetings of shareholders are valid if taken by the favorable vote of shares representing more than 50% of our capital (or 50% of the relevant series).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, resolutions at extraordinary meetings of shareholders called to discuss any of the issues listed below are
valid only if approved by a vote of shares representing at least 75% of our capital:



| |  |  | any amendment to our bylaws that: (i) changes or deletes the authorities of our committees; or (ii) changes or deletes the rights of minority shareholders,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any actions resulting in the cancellation of the concessions granted to us or our subsidiaries by the Mexican government or any assignment of rights arising therefrom,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | termination of the participation agreement between us and AMP,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a merger by us with an entity the business of which is not directly related to the business of us or our subsidiaries, or
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a spin-off, dissolution or liquidation of us.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



152



---

##### Table of Contents

Our bylaws also establish the following voting requirements:



| |  |  | the amendment of the restrictions in our bylaws on ownership of shares of our capital stock requires the vote of holders of 85% of our capital stock,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a delisting of our shares requires the vote of holders of 95% of our capital stock, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the amendment of the provisions in our bylaws requiring that a shareholder exceeding our share ownership limits conduct a public sale of his excess shares requires the vote of holders of 85% of our capital stock.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Veto Rights of Holders of Series BB Shares

So long as the Series BB shares represent at least 7.65% of our capital stock, resolutions adopted at shareholders meetings with
respect to any of the issues listed below will only be valid if approved by a vote of a majority of the Series BB shares:



| |  |  | approval of our financial statements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | liquidation or dissolution;
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | capital increases or decreases;
| | - |  | -------------------------------



| |  |  | declaration and payment of dividends;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------



| |  |  | amendment to our bylaws;
| | - |  | ------------------------



| |  |  | mergers, spin-offs or share-splits;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | grant or amendment of special rights to any series of shares; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | any decision amending or nullifying a resolution validly taken by the board of directors with respect to: (i) appointment of our top-level executive officers, (ii) appointment of the three members of our
Operating Committee and of the members of the Audit, Acquisitions and Nominations and Compensation committees to be designated by the directors elected by the holders of the Series BB shares and (iii) appointment of the members of the
Operating Committee whose appointment requires the consent of the directors elected by the holders of the Series BB shares, and decisions of the board of directors that require the affirmative vote of the directors elected by the holders of our
Series BB shares.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dividends and Distributions

At our Annual Ordinary General Shareholders Meeting, the board of directors will submit to the shareholders for their approval our
audited consolidated financial statements for the preceding fiscal year. Five percent of our net income (after profit sharing and other deductions required by Mexican law) must be allocated to a legal reserve fund until the legal reserve fund
reaches an amount equal to at least 20% of our capital stock (without adjustment for inflation). Additional amounts may be allocated to other reserve funds as the shareholders may from time to time determine including a reserve to repurchase shares.
The remaining balance, if any, of net earnings may be distributed as dividends on the shares of common stock. A full discussion of our dividend policy may be found in Item 8, Financial Information  Dividends. At the
General Ordinary Shareholders Meetings held on April 27, 2011, we declared a dividend of Ps. 1.04 billion or Ps. 1.9231 per common share. The first dividend payment of Ps. 780.0 million was made on



153



---

##### Table of Contents

May 31, 2011. The second dividend payment of Ps. 255.1 million was made on November 29, 2011. At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2012 we
declared a dividend of Ps. 1.13 billion, or Ps. 2.1292 per common share. The first payment for that dividend in the amount of Ps. 847.5 million was made on May 31, 2012, and the remaining Ps. 282.5 million was paid on
November 1, 2012. At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013 we declared a dividend of Ps. 1.21 billion, or Ps. 2.2837 per common share. The first payment for that dividend in the amount of Ps.
907.5 million was made on April 25, 2013, and the remaining Ps. 302.5 million was paid on November 27, 2013.

In an
Extraordinary General Stockholders Meeting held on September 25, 2012, the stockholders approved a capital distribution to be paid in cash for Ps. 870.0 million, which is comprised of Ps. 572.5 million for common stock with a
historical value and Ps. 297.5 million for the value of inflation recognized through December 31, 2007 in according with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards. This is because for legal and tax purposes in Mexico, Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., as an individual entity, will continue preparing and presenting separate financial information under MFRS. Therefore, for any transaction related to Stockholders Equity, the Company must take into consideration
the accounting balances prepared under MFRS and determine the tax effects under applicable laws in Mexico, which require financial information prepared using MFRS.

As a part of the adoption of IFRS in 2012, the effects of inflation recognized in the Stockholders Equity under MFRS until
December 31, 2007, were reclassified to retained earnings, as the cumulative inflation recognized under IFRS occurred during periods that were not considered to be hyperinflationary in IFRS. As a result, the effects of inflation for the common
stock reduction of Ps. 297.5 million recorded under MFRS is presented as a reduction to retained earnings for IFRS purposes, which is the account where these effects were reclassified at the date of transition to IFRS (January 1, 2011).

Registration

Our shares have been
registered with the National Securities Registry, as required under the Securities Market Law and regulations issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission. If we wish to cancel our registration, or if it is cancelled by the
Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission, we will be required to make a public offer to purchase all outstanding shares, prior to such cancellation. Unless the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission authorizes otherwise, the
price of the offer to purchase will be the higher of: (i) the average of the trading price of our shares during the prior thirty trading days (during a period of no more than six months); or (ii) the book value of the shares in accordance
with the most recent quarterly report submitted to the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission and to the Mexican Stock Exchange. Any waiver to the foregoing provisions included in our bylaws requires the prior approval of the Mexican
National Banking and Securities Commission and the approval, at an extraordinary shareholders meeting, of 95% of our outstanding capital stock.

Shareholder Ownership Restrictions and Antitakeover Protection

Holders of our shares are subject to the following restrictions:



| |  |  | holders of Series B shares, either individually or together with their related parties, may not directly or indirectly own more than 10% of our Series B shares;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | although there is no limit on individual holdings of Series BB shares, Series BB shares may represent no more than 15% of our outstanding capital stock;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | holders of Series BB shares may also own Series B shares;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



154



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | no shareholder may vote more than 10% of our capital stock. Shares in excess of this threshold will be voted in the same manner as the majority of our shares;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the aforementioned limits may not be circumvented by means of any special trust; collective ownership or voting agreement or any other scheme that could confer a higher percentage of share ownership or voting powers;
and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | foreign governments acting in a sovereign capacity may not directly or indirectly own any portion of our capital stock.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A person exceeding the 10% threshold described above with respect to our Series B shares must conduct a public offer of his excess
shares.

Any amendment to the ownership restrictions described above requires the vote of shares representing 85% of our capital stock.

Changes in Capital Stock

Increases
and reductions of our minimum fixed capital must be approved at an extraordinary shareholders meeting, subject to the provisions of our bylaws and the Mexican General Law of Business Corporations. Increases or reductions of the variable
capital must be approved at an ordinary shareholders meeting in compliance with the voting requirements of our bylaws.

Pursuant to
Article 53 of the Securities Market Law, we may issue unsubscribed shares that will be kept in treasury, to be subsequently subscribed by the investing public, provided that



| |  |  | the general extraordinary shareholders meeting approves the maximum amount of the capital increase and the conditions upon which the corresponding placement of shares shall be made,
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the subscription of issued shares is made through a public offer following registration in the National Securities Registry and complying with the provisions of the Securities Market Law and other applicable law, and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the amount of the subscribed and paid-in capital of the company is announced when the company makes the authorized capital increase public.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The preferential subscription right provided under Article 132 of the General Law of Business Entities (Ley General de Sociedades
Mercantiles) is not applicable to capital increases through public offers.

Subject to the individual ownership limitations set forth
in our bylaws, in the event of an increase of our capital stock our shareholders will have a preemptive right to subscribe and pay for new stock issued as a result of such increase in proportion to their shareholder interest at that time, unless:
the capital increase is made under the provisions of Article 53 of the Securities Market Law. Said preemptive right shall be exercised by any method provided in Section 132 of the Mexican General Corporations Law, by subscription and
payment of the relevant stock within fifteen business days after the date of publication of the corresponding notice to our shareholders in the Mexican Federal Gazette and in one of the newspapers of greater circulation in Mexico, provided that if
at the corresponding meeting all of our shares are duly represented, the fifteen business day period shall commence on the date of the meeting.

Our capital stock may be reduced by resolution of a shareholders meeting taken generally pursuant to the rules applicable to capital
increases. Our capital stock may also be reduced upon repurchase of our own stock in accordance with the Securities Market Law. See  Share Repurchases below.



155



---

##### Table of Contents

Share Repurchases

We may choose to acquire our own shares or negotiable instruments representing such shares through the Mexican Stock Exchange on the following
terms and conditions:



| |  |  | The acquisition and sale on the Mexican Stock Exchange is made at market price (except when dealing with public offerings or auctions authorized by the National Banking and Securities Commission).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | If the acquisition is charged against shareholders equity, the shares may be kept by us without the need to make a reduction in our capital stock. Otherwise, if the acquisition is charged against our capital
stock, the shares will be converted into unsubscribed shares kept in our treasury, without need for a resolution by our shareholders at a shareholders meeting.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The company must announce the amount of the subscribed and paid-in capital when the amount of the authorized capital represented by the issued and unsubscribed shares is publicly announced.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The general ordinary shareholders meeting will expressly determine for each fiscal year the maximum amount of resources that we may use to purchase our own shares or negotiable instruments that represent such
shares, with the only limitation that the sum or total of the resources that may be used for such purpose may not exceed, at any time, the total balance of the net profits of the company, including retained profits.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | We must be up to date in the payment of obligations under debt instruments issued and registered in the National Securities Registry that we may have issued.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shares of the company belonging to us may not be represented or voted in shareholders meetings, nor may corporate or economic rights of
any kind be exercised, nor will the shares be considered as outstanding for the purpose of determining the quorum or voting in shareholders meetings.

At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved for
a maximum amount of Ps. 640 million for the twelve months following April 24, 2013. During the period from April 24, 2013 to March 31, 2014, we purchased 5,345,053 shares at an average price of Ps. 67.66 for Ps. 359.3 million.

At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2012, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved
for a maximum amount of Ps. 280.0 million for the twelve months following April 16, 2012. However, we did not make any repurchases during this period.

At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 27, 2011, a stock buy-back program for Series B shares was approved for
a maximum amount of Ps. 473.5 million for the twelve months following April 27, 2011. Through the date of this report, we purchased 10,061,800 shares at an average price of Ps. 47.06 for Ps. 473.5 million. These shares represent 1.8% of
our total outstanding shares. See Item 16E, Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.



156



---

##### Table of Contents

Ownership of Capital Stock by Subsidiaries

Our subsidiaries may not, directly or indirectly, invest in our shares, except for shares of our capital stock acquired as part of any employee
stock option plan, which may not exceed 25% of our capital stock, or through asset managers (sociedades de inversión).

Liquidation

Upon our dissolution, one or more liquidators must be appointed at an extraordinary shareholders meeting to wind up our affairs.
All fully paid and outstanding shares will be entitled to participate equally in any distribution upon liquidation. Partially paid shares participate in any distribution in the same proportion that such shares have been paid at the time of the
distribution.

Other Provisions

Liabilities of
the members of the Board of Directors

As in any other Mexican corporation, and due to the provisions contained in Article 38
of the Securities Market Law, any shareholder or group of shareholders holding at least 5% of our capital stock may directly exercise a civil liability action under Mexican law against the members of the board of directors.

In addition to the foregoing, our bylaws provide that, a member of the board of directors will be liable to us and our shareholders for
breaching his or her duties, as provided under articles 29 to 37 of the Securities Market Law.

Our bylaws provide that the members of the
board of directors, or the board committees, and the secretary shall be indemnified by us in case of violations of their duty of care (deber de diligencia), as long as they did not act in bad faith, violate their duty of loyalty or commit an
illicit act under the Securities Market Law or other applicable law. Additionally, our bylaws provide that we shall indemnify the members of the board of directors and the secretary for any indemnification liability which they may incur as long as
they have not acted in bad faith, violated their duty of loyalty or committed an illicit act under the Securities Market Law or other applicable law.

Information to Shareholders

The
Securities Market Law establishes that we, acting through our boards of directors, must annually present a report at a shareholders meeting that includes the following:



| |  |  | A report prepared by the chairman of our Audit Committee, as required by Article 43 of the Securities Market Law, which must cover, among other things: (i) the performance of our top-level officers,
(ii) transactions with related parties, (iii) the compensation packages for our directors and officers, (iv) waivers granted by the board of directors regarding corporate opportunities, (v) the situation of our, and our
subsidiaries internal controls and internal auditing, (vi) preventive and corrective measures adopted in connection with non-compliance with operational and accounting guidelines, (vii) the performance of our external auditor,
(viii) additional services provided by our external auditor and independent experts, (ix) the main results of the review of our and our subsidiaries financial statements and (x) the effects of changes to our accounting policies.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



157



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | The report prepared by the chief executive officer under article 44, paragraph XI of the Securities Market Law. This report must be accompanied by the report (dictamen) of the external auditor, and should
include, among other things: (i) a report of the directors on the operations of the company during the preceding year, as well as on the policies followed by the directors and on the principal existing projects of the company, (ii) a
statement of the financial condition of the company at the end of the fiscal year, (iii) a statement regarding the results of operations of the company during the preceding year, as well as changes in the companys financial condition and
capital stock during the preceding year, and (iv) the notes which are required to complete or clarify the foregoing information.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The boards opinion on the contents of the report prepared by the chief executive officer and mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A report explaining the principal accounting and information policies and criteria followed in the preparation of the financial information.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A report regarding the operations and activities in which the board participated, as provided under the Securities Market Law.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the foregoing, our bylaws specify additional information obligations of the board of directors, including that the board of
directors should also prepare the information referred to in Article 172 of the General Law on Business Entities with respect to any subsidiary that represents at least 20% of our net worth (based on the financial statements most recently
available).

Duration

The
duration of our corporate existence has been set at 100 years, ending in the year 2098.

Shareholders Conflict of Interest

Under Mexican law, any shareholder that has a conflict of interest with respect to any transaction must abstain from voting
thereon at the relevant shareholders meeting. A shareholder that votes on a transaction in which its interest conflicts with ours may be liable for damages in the event the relevant transaction would not have been approved without such
shareholders vote.

Directors Conflict of Interest

Under Mexican law, any director who has a conflict of interest in any transaction must disclose such fact to the other directors and abstain
from voting on such transaction. Any director who violates such provision will be liable to us for any resulting damages or losses. Additionally, under our bylaws, certain conflicts of interest will have the effect of disqualifying a person from
serving on our board of directors.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Our subsidiaries are parties to the airport concessions granted by the Ministry of Communications and Transportation under which we are required to construct,
operate, maintain and develop the airports in exchange for certain benefits. See Item 4,Regulatory FrameworkSources of Regulation and Item 4,Regulatory Framework  Scope of Concessions and
Item 4,Regulatory Framework  General Obligations of Concession Holders.

We are a party to a participation
agreement with AMP and the Ministry of Communications and Transportation which establishes the framework for several other agreements to which we are a party. See Item 7, Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  Related
Party Transactions.



158



---

##### Table of Contents

We have entered into a Technical Assistance Agreement with AMP providing for management and
consulting services. See Item 7, Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions  Related Party Transactions.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

Mexico has had free market for foreign exchange since 1991, and the government has allowed the peso to float freely against the U.S. dollar
since December 1994.

TAXATION

The following summary contains a description of the material U.S. and Mexican federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and
disposition of our Series B shares or ADSs by a beneficial holder that is a citizen or resident of the United States or a U.S. domestic corporation or that otherwise is subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of our
Series B shares or ADSs and that is a non-Mexican holder (as defined below) (a U.S. holder), but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision
to purchase, hold or dispose of our Series B shares or ADSs. In particular, the summary deals only with U.S. holders that hold our Series B shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not address the tax treatment of special classes of U.S.
holders such as entities treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes or a partner in such partnership, dealers in securities or currencies, U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, U.S. holders that own or are
treated as owning 10% or more of our outstanding voting shares, tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, U.S. holders liable for the alternative minimum tax, securities traders who elect to account for their investment in Series B
shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis and investors holding Series B shares or ADSs in a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, the summary
does not address any U.S. or Mexican state or local tax considerations that may be relevant to a U.S. holder.

The summary is based upon
the federal income tax laws of the United States of America (hereinafter United States) and the United Mexican States (hereinafter Mexico) as in effect on the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, including the provisions
of The Convention between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Mexican States for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, together with a
related Protocols and Competent Authority Agreements, (hereinafter Tax Treaty), all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect in the case of U.S. federal income tax law. Prospective investors in our Series B
shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisors as to the U.S., Mexican or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Series B shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or
local tax laws and their entitlement to the benefits, if any, afforded by the Tax Treaty.

For purposes of this summary, the term
non-Mexican holder shall mean a holder that is not a resident of Mexico for federal tax purposes and that does not hold the Series B shares or ADSs or a beneficial interest therein in connection with the conduct of a trade or
business through a permanent establishment or fixed base in Mexico.

For purposes of Mexican taxation, the definition of residency is
highly technical and residency results in several situations. Generally, an individual is a resident of Mexico if he or she has established his or her home in Mexico, and a corporation is a resident if it has its place of effective management or
center of interests in Mexico. An individual who has a home in Mexico and another country will be considered to be a resident of Mexico if Mexico is the individuals significant center of interest. However, any determination of residence should
take into account the particular situation of each person or legal entity. If a legal entity or an individual is deemed to have a permanent establishment in Mexico for Mexican tax purposes, all income attributable to that permanent establishment
will be subject to Mexican income taxes, in accordance with applicable tax laws.



159



---

##### Table of Contents

This summary does not address all of the Mexican tax consequences that may be applicable to
specific holders of the shares or ADSs (including a holder that controls the Company, an investor that holds 10% or more of the shares or ADSs or holders that constitute a group of persons for purposes of Mexican law that controls the Company or
that holds 10% or more of the shares or ADSs, or a holder that is a resident of Mexico or that is a corporation resident in a tax haven (as defined in the Mexican Income Tax Law)). It also does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all
the Mexican tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, own or dispose of the shares. In particular, this summary does not describe any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality, municipality or taxing
jurisdiction other than certain federal laws of Mexico.

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of ADSs are treated as
the beneficial owners of the Series B shares represented by those ADSs. Accordingly, deposits and withdrawals of Series B shares by U.S. holders in exchange for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.

Taxation of Dividends

Mexican Tax Considerations

Under
the Mexican Income Tax Law, dividends paid to Mexican individuals or any foreign residents are subject to a 10% withholding tax if paid from earnings generated during and after 2014, but are not subject to Mexican withholding tax if paid from
earnings generated before 2014. Non-Mexican holders may be subject to withholding tax at reduced rates if they are eligible for benefits under an applicable tax treaty with Mexico.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

The gross amount of any distributions paid with respect to the Series B shares or ADSs, to the extent paid out of our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, generally are includible in the gross income of a U.S. holder as ordinary income on the date on which the distributions are received by the depositary and are not
eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to certain corporations under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). To the extent that a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and
profits, it is treated as a non-taxable return of basis to the extent thereof, and thereafter as capital gain from the sale of Series B shares or ADSs. Distributions, which are made in pesos, are includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a
U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date they are received by the depositary whether or not they are converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt. If such distributions are converted into U.S.
dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the distributions. Any gain or loss on a subsequent conversion or other disposition of the pesos generally will
be treated as ordinary income or loss to such U.S. holder and generally will be income or loss from sources within the United States for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, so long as certain holding period and other requirements are met, the U.S.
dollar amount of dividends received by certain non-corporate U.S. holders with respect to the Series B shares or ADSs will be subject to taxation at preferential rates if the dividends are qualified dividends. Dividends paid on the ADSs
will be treated as qualified dividends if: (i) we are eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the



160



---

##### Table of Contents

United States that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has approved for the purpose of the qualified dividend rules; and (ii) we were not, in the year prior to the year in which
the dividend was paid, and are not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a passive foreign investment company (PFIC). The Tax Treaty has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rule. In addition, based on our audited
consolidated financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we were not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2012 or 2013 taxable years. In addition, based on our audited
consolidated financial statements and our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a PFIC for our 2014 taxable
year.

Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, Mexican withholding tax imposed on distributions with respect to
Series B shares or ADSs will generally give rise to a foreign tax credit or deduction against U.S. federal income tax liability. For purposes of applying the foreign tax credit limitation, dividend distributions generally constitute foreign-source,
passive category income (or in the case of certain U.S. holders, general category income). The use of foreign tax credits is subject to complex rules and limitations. U.S. holders are urged to consult their tax adviser whether, and to what extent, a
foreign tax credit will be available in light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dispositions of Shares or ADSs

Mexican Tax Considerations

Subject
to applicable tax treaties, any gain on the sale of our Series B shares or ADSs by any holder is subject to a 10% withholding tax in Mexico on the net gain from the sale if the transaction is carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other
approved securities markets (including the NYSE), while gains from a sale in other circumstances will give rise to a 25% Mexican withholding tax on the gross proceeds realized from the sale. Alternatively, a non-Mexican holder may, subject to
certain requirements, elect to pay taxes on the gains realized from the sale of ADSs or Series B shares on a net basis at a rate of 35.0%.

However, a U.S. holder that demonstrates its eligibility for benefits under the Tax Treaty will generally be exempt from Mexican tax on gains
or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of the Series B shares or ADSs, so long as the holder did not own, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of our capital stock (including ADSs) within the 12-month period preceding such sale or other
disposition. Gains and gross proceeds realized by other non-Mexican holders that are eligible to receive benefits pursuant to other income tax treaties to which Mexico is a party may be exempt from Mexican income tax on a sale or disposition of the
Series B shares or ADSs in whole or in part. Such other non-Mexican holders should consult their own tax advisors as to their possible eligibility under an applicable treaty. A U.S. holder may be required to comply with certain requirements,
including, among others, certifying or documenting its tax residence or filing certain information with the Mexican tax authority, in order to qualify for benefits under the Tax Treaty.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

Upon the sale or other disposition of the Series B shares or ADSs, a U.S. holder will generally recognize gain or loss in an amount equal
to the difference between the amount realized for the shares and such U.S. holders tax basis in the Series B shares or ADSs (in U.S. dollars). Such gain or loss will generally be capital gain or loss. Gain or loss recognized by a U.S.
holder on such sale or other disposition generally is treated as long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, the Series B shares or ADSs had been held for more than one year. Long-term capital gain
recognized by a non-corporate U.S. holder is taxable at reduced rates. The deduction of a capital loss is subject to limitations. A U.S. holder that receives non-U.S. currency from a sale or other disposition of the Series B



161



---

##### Table of Contents

shares or ADSs generally will recognize an amount equal to the U.S. dollar value of such non-U.S. currency on the date the shares are disposed of. A cash basis or electing accrual basis taxpayer
will determine the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized by translating such amount at the spot rate on the settlement date of the sale. If an accrual basis U.S. holder makes the election described above, it must be applied consistently from year
to year and cannot be revoked without the consent of the IRS. A U.S. holder will have a tax basis in any non-U.S. currency received in respect of the sale or other disposition of its Series B shares or ADSs equal to its U.S. dollar value calculated
at the exchange rate in effect on the date of such sale or other disposition (or in the case of a cash basis or electing accrual basis taxpayer the exchange rate in effect on the date of the receipt).

Gain, if any, realized by a U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition of the Series B shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S.
source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, if a Mexican withholding tax is imposed on the sale or disposition of the Series B shares or ADSs, a U.S. holder that does not receive significant foreign source income from
other sources may not be able to derive effective U.S. foreign tax credit benefits in respect of these Mexican taxes. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the foreign tax credit rules to their investment
in, and disposition of, Series B shares or ADSs.

Other Mexican Taxes

There are no Mexican inheritance, gift, succession or value-added taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of the
Series B shares or ADSs by non-Mexican holders; provided, however, that gratuitous transfers of the Series B shares or ADSs may in certain circumstances cause a Mexican federal tax to be imposed upon the recipient. There are no Mexican
stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by non-Mexican holders of the Series B shares or ADSs.

U.S. Backup Withholding Tax
and Information Reporting Requirements

Dividends on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the shares or ADSs paid to a
U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder:



| |  |  | establishes that it is a corporation or other exempt holder; or
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | provides an accurate taxpayer identification number on a properly completed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable
requirements of the backup withholding rules.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The amount of any backup withholding from a payment to a holder will be
allowed as a credit against the U.S. holders U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle such holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information electronically with the SEC pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Any filings we make are also available to the public over the Internet at the SECs website at www.sec.gov and at our website at http://www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx/. (This
URL is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. It is not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL, is not and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated into this annual report).



162



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 11. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Market Risk

See Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements for disclosure about market risk.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Our principal exchange rate risk involves changes in the value of the peso relative to the dollar. Historically, a significant portion of the
revenues generated by our airports (principally derived from passenger charges for international passengers) has been denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar, although such revenues are collected in pesos based on the average exchange rate for
the prior month. In 2011, 2012 and 2013, approximately 23.3%, 25.9% and 26.2%, respectively, of our total revenues were derived from passenger charges for international passengers (in 2011, 2012 and 2013, 29.5%, 29.3% and 28.6%, respectively, of the
sum of our aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues were derived from passenger charges for international passengers). Substantially all of our other revenues are denominated in pesos. We estimate that substantially all of our consolidated costs
and expenses are denominated in pesos (other than the technical assistance fee, to the extent paid based on the fixed minimum annual payment). Based upon a 1.0% depreciation of the peso compared to the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2013, we
estimate that our passenger charges revenues from international passengers would have increased by Ps. 13.7 million.

As of
December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, 12.5%, 21.3% and 15.9%, respectively, of our cash and marketable securities were denominated in dollars. Based upon a 10% depreciation of the peso compared to the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2013, we
estimate that the value of our cash and marketable securities would have increased by Ps. 41.0 million.

We did not have any relevant
foreign currency indebtedness at December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013. In the event that we incur foreign currency denominated indebtedness in the future, decreases in the value of the peso relative to the dollar will increase the cost in pesos of
servicing such indebtedness.

At December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, we did not have any outstanding forward foreign exchange
contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

Over the last three years, we have funded the majority of our capital expenditures with bank loans, and we expect to continue to do so. We have
entered into bank loans bearing both fixed and variable interest rates. Our fixed-rate debt establishes a fixed interest rate of 8.52%, and the unpaid balance as of December 31, 2013 was Ps. 212.5 million. In 2009, we entered into bank loans
bearing variable interest rates, which expose us to interest rate risk. The primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in the relevant base rates (the banks charge interest at a rate based on the Tasa de Interés Interbancaria
de Equilibrio, or Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate (TIIE) plus 3.5%). In order to hedge against such interest rate risk, in December 2009, we entered into a cash flow hedge with Banamex for a nominal amount of Ps.
372.2 million, which sets a ceiling of 7% on the TIIE, resulting in a maximum interest rate of 10.5%. The fair market value of this instrument as of December 31, 2013 was Ps. 0.3 million. This instrument would be in effect from December
2012 until January 2017; however, we made a Ps. 61.6 million prepayment of the loan in December 2013, and in February 2014, we prepaid the remaining balance of Ps. 217.6 million. With these payments these loans were paid in full, and as a
result, the cash



163



---

##### Table of Contents

flow hedge will be terminated. In 2011, we entered into bank loans with HSBC and Banamex bearing variable interest rates, which expose us to interest rate risk. The primary interest rate risk
exposure results from changes in the relevant base rates. HSBC charges interest at a rate based on the TIIE plus 1.65%. Banamex charges interest base on the TIIE plus 1.35% for the 2011 disbursements and 1.43% for 2012 disbursements. In August and
November 2012, we entered into bank loans with BBVA Bancomer with an interest rate based on the TIIE plus 120 basis points. On April 10, 2013, we entered into bank loans with BBVA Bancomer with an interest rate based on the TIIE plus 133 basis
points. We had approximately Ps. 1.0 billion in variable rate debt at December 31, 2013. For more information regarding our economic hedging transactions, see Item 5,Operating and Financial Review and Prospects  Liquidity
and Capital Resources  Indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2013, we paid Ps. 104.8 million of interest expense
under variable interest rate loans, with an average TIIE rate of 3.9% plus basis points contracted as corresponding. Based upon a 100 basis points increase of the TIIE rate, we estimate that our interest expense would have increased by Ps. 10.5
million.



|Item 12. | Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 12A. | Debt Securities
|--------- | ---------------

Not applicable.



|Item 12B. | Warrants and Rights
|--------- | -------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 12C. | Other Securities
|--------- | ----------------

Not applicable.



|Item 12D. | American Depositary Shares
|--------- | --------------------------

The Bank of New York Mellon serves as the depositary for our
ADSs. ADS holders are required to pay various fees to the depositary.

The following is a summary of the fees payable by holders of our
ADRs. For more complete information regarding ADRs, you should read the entire deposit agreement and the form of ADR.



|                                                |  |                                                            |  |                        
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Service                                         |  | Fee or Charge Amount                                       |  | Payee                  
|Execution and delivery of ADRs                  |  | U.S.$ 5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Surrender of ADRs                               |  | U.S.$ 5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs) |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Any cash distribution to ADR registered holders |  | U.S.$ 0.02 (or less) per ADS                               |  | Bank of New York Mellon



164



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |                                                                                                                                                           |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the depositary to ADR registered holders                                                            |  | A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited for issuance of ADSs |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Registration of transfers of shares on our share register to or from the name of the depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares                                                       |  | Registration or transfer fees                                                                                                                             |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions (as expressly provided in the deposit agreement)                                                                                                              |  | Expenses of the depositary                                                                                                                                |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars                                                                                                                                                            |  | Expenses of the depositary                                                                                                                                |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Taxes and other governmental charges the Bank of New York Mellon or the custodian has to pay on any ADR or share underlying an ADR, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes |  | As necessary                                                                                                                                              |  | Bank of New York Mellon
|Other fees, as necessary                                                                                                                                                                               |  | Any charges incurred by Bank of New York Mellon or its agents for servicing the deposited securities                                                      |  | Bank of New York Mellon

The depositary of our ADSs, The Bank of New York Mellon, collects its fees directly from investors depositing
shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The depositary collects these fees by deducting them from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees.
For example, the depositary may deduct from cash distributions, directly bill investors or charge the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees
for these services are paid.

Reimbursements by the Depositary

The Bank of New York Mellon, as depositary of our ADSs, pays us an agreed amount, which includes expenses related to the administration and
maintenance of the ADS facility including, but not limited to, investor relations expenses, the annual New York Stock Exchange listing fees (as invoiced in the reimbursement request to the depositary) or any other program related expenses. There are
limits on the amount of expenses for which the depositary will reimburse us, but the amount of reimbursement available to us is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the depositary collects from investors. We did not receive any reimbursements
from the depositary during 2011. We received U.S.$ 174,486.00 in reimbursements from the depositary during 2012. On January 31, 2014, we received U.S.$ 286,799 in reimbursements for expenses from 2013 from the depositary.



165



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II



|Item 13. | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 14. | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not
applicable.



|Item 15. | Controls and Procedures
|-------- | -----------------------

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013.

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure
controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving
their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with international financial reporting standards. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company;

(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with international financial reporting standards, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and
directors; and

(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate. Under the supervision of our Chief Executive



166



---

##### Table of Contents

Officer and Chief Financial Officer, our management assessed the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making its assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, in Internal Control  Integrated Framework.

Based on our assessment and those criteria, our management has concluded that our company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2013.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C.
(member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited), has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Controls

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A companys internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors,
management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of
the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal
control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.



167



---

##### Table of Contents

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the
translation of the Companys consolidated financial statements into English.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C.       
|Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
|                                          
|/s/ SALVADOR ARTURO SÁNCHEZ BARRAGÁN      
|C.P.C. Salvador Arturo Sánchez Barragán   
|Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico              
|February 26, 2014                         

(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



|Item 16. | Reserved
|-------- | --------



|Item 16A. | Audit Committee Financial Expert
|--------- | --------------------------------

Carlos Cárdenas Guzmán, an
independent director under NYSE listing standards, joined our board of directors and our Audit Committee in 2011, and we believe that he is qualified to serve as our audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of Form
20-F under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Our board of directors appointed Mr. Cárdenas Guzmán as President of the Audit Committee and also as the financial expert of that Committee. For a discussion of
Mr. Cárdenas Guzmáns qualifications, see Item 6, Directors, Senior Management and Employees  Directors.



|Item 16B. | Code of Ethics
|--------- | --------------

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B of
Form 20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and personnel performing similar functions as well as to our other
officers and employees. Our code of ethics is an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F and is available on our website at www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx. If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our chief executive officer,
chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address. The information found on our
website, other than as specifically incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 20-F, is not part of this annual report on Form 20-F.



168



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 16C. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|--------- | --------------------------------------

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by our independent auditors, Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C. (member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited), during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013:



|                   |  |                         |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     |        | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | --- | ------ | ---- |  | --- | ------ | 
|                   |  | Year ended December 31, |       
|                   |  | 2011                    |        |  | 2012 |     |        | 2013 | 
|                   |  | (thousands of pesos)    |       
|Audit fees         |  | Ps.                     | 5,838  |  |      | Ps. | 6,053  |      |  | Ps. | 6,079  | 
|Audit-related fees |  |                         | 2,731  |  |      |     | 2,929  |      |  |     | 2,945  | 
|Tax fees           |  |                         | 2,111  |  |      |     | 522    |      |  |     | 67     | 
|Other fees         |  |                         | 1,364  |  |      |     | 1,430  |      |  |     | 1,287  | 
|                   |  |                         |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     |        | 
|Total fees         |  | Ps.                     | 12,044 |  |      | Ps. | 10,934 |      |  | Ps. | 10,378 | 
|                   |  |                         |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     |        | 

Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C. in
connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, the audit of the financial statements of certain subsidiaries and other statutory audit reports.

Audit-related fees in the above table are fees billed by Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C. for services related to the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and other audit related-services.

Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C.
for a monthly review of our tax calculations and for services related to tax refund claims.

Other fees in the above table are fees billed
by Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruíz Urquiza, S.C. for transfer pricing services and other services.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our audit committee has not established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of our independent auditors for
services. Our audit committee expressly approves on a case-by-case basis any engagement of our independent auditors for audit and non-audit services provided to our subsidiaries or to us.



|Item 16D. | Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees
|--------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



169



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 16E. | Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
|--------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

The tables below
set forth, for the periods indicated, the total number of shares purchased by us or on our behalf, or by or on behalf of an affiliated purchaser, the average price paid per share, the total number of shares purchased as a part of a
publicly announced repurchase plan or program and the maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under our plans and programs.

Shares repurchased by us pursuant to the share repurchase program



|               |  |                                          |           |  |                                         |  |       |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                            |  |  |  |      | 
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | --------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---- | 
|2013           |  | (a) Totalnumber ofsharespurchased(1) (2) |           |  | (b) Average pricepaid per share inPesos |  |       | (c) Total number ofshares purchasedas part of publiclyannounced plansor programs(3) |  |  | (d) Approximatedollar value that mayyet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms(in million) | 
|January 1-31   |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|February 1-29  |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|March 1-31     |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|April 1-30     |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|May 1-31       |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|June 1-30      |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|July 1-31      |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|August 1-31    |  |                                          |          |  |                                         |  |      |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |  |     | 
|September 1-30 |  |                                          | 1,025,820 |  |                                         |  | 67.33 |                                                                                     |  |  | 1,025,820                                                                                  |  |  |  | 5.3  | 
|October 1-31   |  |                                          | 439,250   |  |                                         |  | 67.48 |                                                                                     |  |  | 439,250                                                                                    |  |  |  | 2.3  | 
|November 1-30  |  |                                          | 2,099,429 |  |                                         |  | 66.49 |                                                                                     |  |  | 2,099,429                                                                                  |  |  |  | 10.7 | 
|December 1-31  |  |                                          | 562,993   |  |                                         |  | 68.28 |                                                                                     |  |  | 562,993                                                                                    |  |  |  | 3.0  | 
|               |  |                                          |           |  |                                         |  |       |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                            |  |  |  |      | 
|2013 Total     |  |                                          | 4,127,492 |  |                                         |  | 67.05 |                                                                                     |  |  | 4,127,492                                                                                  |  |  |  | 21.2 | 
|               |  |                                          |           |  |                                         |  |       |                                                                                     |  |  |                                                                                            |  |  |  |      | 



|(1) | We do not repurchase our shares other than through the share repurchase program. Shares repurchased, if any, were purchased in open-market transactions.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | During 2013 AMP did not buy any of our shares.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------

|(3) | We periodically repurchase our shares on the open market using funds authorized by our shareholders specifically for the repurchase of our shares by us at our discretion. At the General Ordinary Shareholders
Meeting held on April 27, 2011, a stock buy-back program was approved under Mexican Securities Law, for a maximum amount of Ps. 473.5 million for the twelve months following the meeting. At the General Ordinary Stockholders Meeting
held on April 16, 2012, a stock buy-back program was approved under Mexican Securities Law, for the maximum amount of Ps. 280.0 million for the twelve months following meeting. No shares were repurchased under the buyback program in 2012.
At the General Ordinary Shareholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, a stock buy-back program was approved under Mexican Securities Law, for a maximum amount of Ps. 640 million for the twelve months following April 24, 2013.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As of December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, there was a total balance of 30,279,400, 30,279,400 and 34,406,892 repurchased
shares, respectively, on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.



|Item 16F. | Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant.
|--------- | ---------------------------------------------

Not applicable.



|Item 16G. | Corporate Governance
|--------- | --------------------

Pursuant to Section 303A.11 of the Listed Company Manual of
the New York Stock Exchange, we are required to provide a summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. We are a Mexican corporation with
shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Our corporate governance practices are governed by our bylaws, the Securities Market Law and the regulations issued by the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional
Bancaria y de Valores). We also generally



170



---

##### Table of Contents

comply on a voluntary basis with the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices (Código de Mejores Prácticas Corporativas), which was created in January 2001 by a group of
Mexican business leaders and was endorsed by the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission. On an annual basis, we file a report with the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission and the Mexican Stock Exchange regarding our compliance with the
Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices.

The table below discloses the significant differences between our corporate governance
practices and the NYSE standards.



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|NYSE Standards for
Domestic Listed Companies1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  | Our Corporate Governance Practices                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Director Independence.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | 
|§303A.01 specifies that listed companies must have a majority of independent directors.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | Pursuant to the Securities Market Law and Article 15 of our bylaws, at least 25% of the members of our board of directors must be independent.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | 
|To qualify as independent, a director must satisfy the criteria set forth in §303A.02. In particular, a director is not independent if such director is:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  | Determinations regarding independence must be made by our shareholders applying the provisions of the Securities Market Law and our bylaws (which incorporate Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | 
|(i) not a person who the board affirmatively determines has no material direct or indirect relationship with the
company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary; 
(ii) an employee, or an immediate family member of an executive officer, of the company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary,
other than employment as interim chairman or CEO; 
(iii) a person who receives, or whose immediate family member receives, more than $120,000 during any twelve-month period
within the last three years in direct compensation from the company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary, other than director and committee fees or deferred compensation for prior services only (and other than compensation for service as interim
chairman or CEO or received by an immediate family member for service as a non-executive employee); 
(iv) a person who is affiliated with or employed, or whose immediate family member is affiliated with or employed in a professional
capacity, by a present or former internal or external auditor of the company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary; |  | The determination of independence under the Securities Market Law differs in certain respect from the provisions of §303A.02. Under
Article 26 of the Securities Market Law, a director is not independent if such director is: 
(i) an employee or officer of the company or of another company that is a member of the same corporate group (consorcio o grupo
empresarial) as the company (or a person who has been so within the prior year); 
(ii) a person that, without being an employee or officer of the company, has influence or authority over the company or its officers,
or over another company that is a member of the same corporate group as the company; 
(iii) an important client, supplier, debtor or creditor (or a partner, director or employee thereof). A client or supplier is
considered important if its sales to or purchases from the company represent more than 10% of its total sales or purchases within the prior year. A debtor or creditor is considered important if the aggregate amount of the relevant loan represents
more than 15% of its or the companys aggregate assets;



|1 | Reference to sections are references to sections of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual. Pursuant to Section 303A,00 therefore, foreign private issuers, such as us, are exempt from the corporate
governance standards of the exchange, with certain exceptions.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



171



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|NYSE Standards for
Domestic Listed Companies12                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  | Our Corporate Governance Practices                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(v) an executive officer, or an immediate family member of an executive officer, of another company whose
compensation committees membership includes an executive officer of the listed company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary; or 
(vi) an executive officer or employee of a company, or an immediate family member of an executive officer of a company, that makes
payments to, or receives payments from, the listed company, its parent or a consolidated subsidiary for property or services in an amount which, in any single fiscal year, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other companys
consolidated gross revenues (charities are not included, but any such payments must be disclosed in the companys proxy (or, if no proxy is prepared, its Form 10-K / annual report)). |  | (iv) a shareholder that is a part of the control group of the company; or
 (v) a family member, spouse or concubine of any of the persons
mentioned in (i) through (iv) above.  Currently, our board of directors consists
of 11 directors. Seven of such directors have been qualified as independent by our shareholders in accordance with the Securities Market Law and our bylaws.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | 
|Executive Sessions. 
§303A.03 specifies that non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management. Independent directors should
meet alone in an executive session at least once a year.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  | Mexican law, our bylaws and the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices, which we adhere to, do not provide for non-management executive sessions. None of our managers are members of either our board of directors or our other
committees, except that our chief executive officer is the chairman of our Operating Committee, as provided for in Article 27 of our bylaws.        



172



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Committees for Director Nominations and Compensation and for Corporate Governance.
 §303A.04(a) specifies that listed companies must have a nominating/corporate
governance committee composed entirely of independent directors. 
§303A.05(a) specifies that listed companies must have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors. |  | We have a Nominations and Compensation Committee. We also have an Audit Committee, which, pursuant to Article 31 of our
bylaws, has been assigned certain corporate governance (prácticas societarias) oversight obligations mandated by the Securities Market Law. Under Mexican corporate law, a corporations board committees, except for
audit and corporate governance committees, need not be composed only of members of the corporations board of directors. Article 28 of our bylaws provides that at least a majority of the members of our Nominations and Compensation
Committee must be members of our board of directors. No express independence requirements apply to this committee. Currently, the committee consists of 2 members, both of whom are members of our board of directors, and one of whom is independent as
defined under the Securities Market Law and Section 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. 
See above for a description of the composition of our Audit Committee.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | 
|Audit Committee. 
§303A.06 specifies that listed companies must have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
 §303A.07 specifies other requirements for audit committees, including a minimum of
three members who satisfy the independence requirements of Section 3003A.02.                                |  | Foreign private issuers, such as us, are subject to §303A.06 and
thus must comply with Rule 10A-3. We are in compliance with Rule 10A-3 and, as such, our Audit Committee consists entirely of members of our board of directors who meet the independence requirements prescribed in that rule. (The Securities Market
Law likewise contains a requirement that our Audit Committee be entirely independent.) 
We are not subject to §303A.07. As such, our Audit Committee charter (contained in Article 32 of our bylaws) does not make provision for every one of
the specific duties required by §303A.07.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | 
|Corporate Governance Guidelines. 
§303A.09 specifies that listed companies must adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines.                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  | Mexican law does not require us to disclose corporate governance
guidelines and we have not done so. However, pursuant to the Securities Market Law, we have adopted board guidelines covering corporate governance matters such as the use of corporate assets, certain transactions with related parties (including
loans to officers), repurchases of shares, communications with shareholders, managers and directors, and other matters.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           



173



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|Code of Ethics.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|§303A.10 specifies that corporate governance guidelines and a code of business conduct and ethics is required, with disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  | We have adopted a code of ethics, which has been accepted by all of our directors and executive officers and other personnel. A copy of our code of ethics is available on our website: www.aeropuertosgap.com.mx                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|Equity compensation plans. 
§303A.08 & 312 03 specify that equity compensation plans require shareholder approval, subject to limited exemptions.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  | Shareholder approval is not expressly required under our bylaws for the adoption and amendment of an equity-compensation plan. No equity-compensation plans have been approved by our shareholders.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|Shareholder Approval for Issuance of Securities. 
§§312 03(b)-(d) specify that issuances of securities (1) that will result in a change of control of the issuer, (2) that are to a
related party or someone closely related to a related party, (3) that have voting power equal to at least 20% of the outstanding common stock voting power before such issuance or (4) that will increase the number of shares of common stock
by at least 20% of the number of outstanding shares before such issuance require shareholder approval. |  | Mexican law and our bylaws require us to obtain shareholder approval of the issuance of new equity securities.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|Conflicts of Interest. 
§314 00 specifies that the determination of how to review and oversee related party transactions is left to the listed company. The audit committee or
comparable body, however, could be considered the forum for such review and oversight. 
§312.03(b) specifies that certain issuances of common stock to a related party require shareholder approval.                                                                                                                                                       |  | Pursuant to Mexican law, our bylaws and applicable internal guidelines, provided that the corporate practices committee of our board of directors has opined favorably, our board of directors must vote on whether or not to grant
approval of certain transactions with a related party that (i) are outside the ordinary course of our business; or (ii) are at non-market prices. A director with an interest in the transaction is not permitted to vote on its approval.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 
|Solicitation of Proxies. 
§§402 01 & 402 04 specifies that the solicitation of proxies and provision of proxy materials is required for all meetings of
shareholders. Copies of such proxy solicitations are to be provided to NYSE.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | We are not required to distribute proxy materials to, or solicit the return of proxies from, our shareholders. In accordance with Mexican law and our bylaws, we inform shareholders of all meetings by public notice, which states the
requirements for admission to the meeting and provides a mechanism by which shareholders can vote through a representative using a power of attorney. Under the new Mexican Securities Market Law, we have to make power of attorney forms available to
shareholders at their request. Under the deposit agreements relating to our ADSs, holders of our ADSs receive notices of shareholders meetings and, where applicable, instructions on how to vote at the shareholders meeting through the
depositary.



174



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III



|Item 17. | Financial Statements
|-------- | --------------------

The Registrant has responded to Item 18 in lieu of this
Item.



|Item 18. | Financial Statements
|-------- | --------------------

See our consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1,
incorporated herein by reference. The following is an index to the financial statements:

Consolidated Financial Statements for Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries



|                                                                                                                              |  |      |     | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | 
|                                                                                                                              |  | Page |    
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                                                       |  |      | F-1 | 
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012                                                |  |      | F-2 | 
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and
2011 |  |      | F-4 | 
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011               |  |      | F-5 | 
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011                                    |  |      | F-6 | 
|                                                                                                                              | 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                                    |  |      | F-8 | 



|Item 19. | Exhibits
|-------- | --------

Documents filed as exhibits to this annual report:



|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|            | 
|1.1         |  | An English translation of the Amended and Restated Bylaws (Estatutos Sociales) of the Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed on May 10,
2007).                                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|2.1         |  | Deposit Agreement among the Company, The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York) and all registered holders from time to time of any American Depositary Receipts, including the form of American Depositary Receipt
(incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-131220) filed on January 23, 2006).
|            | 
|3.1         |  | Trust Agreement among the Company, AMP and Bancomext, together with an English translation (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-131220) filed on January 23,
2006).                                                                                                                                          



175



---

##### Table of Contents

|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|     | 
|4.1  |  | Amended and Restated Guadalajara Airport Concession Agreement and annexes thereto, together with an English translation and a schedule highlighting the differences between this concession and the Companys other concessions
(incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-131220) filed on January 23, 2006).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|     | 
|4.2  |  | Participation Agreement and Amendment No. 1 thereto among the Registrant, the Mexican Federal Government through the Ministry of Communications and Transportation, Nacional Financiera, S.N.C., the Company, Servicios a la
Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Aguascalientes, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto del Bajío, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Hermosillo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de La
Paz, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Los Mochis, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Manzanillo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Morelia, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Puerto Vallarta, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de San José
del Cabo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V., AMP, AENA, Aeropuerto del Pacífico Ángeles, S.A. de C.V., Inversora del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Dragados, S.A., Grupo Empresarial Ángeles, S.A. de C.V.,
Bancomext, and the Mexican Airport and Auxiliary Services Agency, together with an English translation (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-131220) filed on January 23, 2006).
|     | 
|4.3  |  | Technical Assistance and Transfer of Technology Agreement among the Registrant, Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Aguascalientes, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto del Bajío,
S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Hermosillo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de La Paz, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Los Mochis, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Manzanillo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.,
Aeropuerto de Los Mochis, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Puerto Vallarta, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de San José del Cabo, S.A. de C.V., Aeropuerto de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V., AMP, AENA, Aeropuerto del Pacífico Ángeles, S.A. de C.V.,
Inversora del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Dragados, S.A., and Grupo Empresarial Ángeles, S.A. de C.V., together with an English translation (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-131220)
filed on January 23, 2006).                                                                                                                                                                                         
|     | 
|4.4  |  | Professional Services Agreement between Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V. and AENA Desarrollo Internacional, S.A. dated as of August 4, 2008 (English translation) and a schedule highlighting the differences between this
agreement and similar agreements with the Companys other airport operating subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to our Form 20-F filed on June 29, 2010).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|     | 
|8.1  |  | List of subsidiaries of the Company.*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|     | 
|11.1 |  | Code of Ethics of the Company (incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed on May 10, 2007).                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|     | 
|12.1 |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|     | 
|12.2 |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|     | 
|13.1 |  | Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   



|* | Filed herewith.
|- | ---------------

Omitted from the exhibits filed with this annual report are certain instruments and
agreements with respect to our long-term debt, none of which authorizes securities or results in an incurrence of debt in a total amount that exceeds 10% of our total assets. We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC copies of any such omitted
instruments or agreements as the SEC requests.



176



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the
undersigned to sign this registration statement on its behalf.



Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.By:

/s/ RAÚL REVUELTA MUSALEMName: Raúl Revuelta MusalemTitle:   Chief Financial Officer


Dated: April 16, 2014



177



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico,

S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Financial
Statements as of

December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for

the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and

2011 and Report
of Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm Dated February 26,

2014



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting

Firm and 2013 and 2012 Consolidated Financial

Statements



|                                                                                                                               |  |      |     | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --- | 
|Contents                                                                                                                       |  | Page |    
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                                                        |  |      | F-1 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2013 and 2012                                                 |  |      | F-2 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 
31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 |  |      | F-4 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 
31, 2013, 2012 and 2011               |  |      | F-5 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011                                     |  |      | F-6 | 
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                                                                     |  |      | F-8 | 



---

##### Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public

Accounting Firm to the Board of Directors

and
Stockholders of Grupo Aeroportuario

del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries
(the Company) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2013, 2012 and 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and their results of operations, changes in their shareholders equity and their cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated into English solely for the convenience of readers.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our
report dated February 26, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S. C.

Member of Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu Limited

C.P.C. Salvador A. Sánchez Barragán

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

February 26, 2014



F-1



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012

(In thousands of
Mexican Pesos)



|                                                                         |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------- | ---------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | 
|                                                                         |  | December 31,
2013 |            |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Assets                                                                   |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 
|Current assets:                                                          |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 
|Cash and cash equivalents (Note 5)                                       |  | Ps.               | 2,168,187  |  |                   | Ps. | 1,663,683  | 
|Financial investments held for trading purposes (Note 6)                 |  |                   | 410,433    |  |                   |     | 433,573    | 
|Trade accounts receivable  net (Note 7)                                 |  |                   | 207,515    |  |                   |     | 244,796    | 
|Recoverable taxes (Note 14.b)                                            |  |                   | 82,846     |  |                   |     | 114,369    | 
|Other current assets                                                     |  |                   | 3,106      |  |                   |     | 2,747      | 
|                                                                         |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 
|Total current assets                                                     |  |                   | 2,872,087  |  |                   |     | 2,459,168  | 
|Advance payments to suppliers                                            |  |                   | 82,843     |  |                   |     | 65,764     | 
|Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings  net (Note 8) |  |                   | 873,541    |  |                   |     | 951,465    | 
|Improvements to concession assets  net (Note 9)                         |  |                   | 5,002,667  |  |                   |     | 4,810,150  | 
|Airport concessions  net (Note 10)                                      |  |                   | 9,895,346  |  |                   |     | 10,179,422 | 
|Rights to use airport facilities  net (Note 11)                         |  |                   | 1,213,792  |  |                   |     | 1,270,490  | 
|Other acquired rights  net (Note 12)                                    |  |                   | 581,781    |  |                   |     | 598,481    | 
|Recoverable income taxes (Note 14.a)                                     |  |                   | 269        |  |                   |     | 1,861      | 
|Derivative financial instruments (Note 13)                               |  |                   | 340        |  |                   |     | 1,045      | 
|Deferred income taxes  net (Note 14.e)                                  |  |                   | 4,673,687  |  |                   |     | 4,152,804  | 
|Other assets  net                                                       |  |                   | 38,247     |  |                   |     | 42,987     | 
|                                                                         |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 
|Total                                                                    |  | Ps.               | 25,234,600 |  |                   | Ps. | 24,533,637 | 
|                                                                         |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            | 

(Continued)



F-2



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

As of
December 31, 2013 and 2012

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos)



|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---------- | - | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | -
|                                                               |  | December 31,
2013 |            |   | December 31,
2012 |    
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                           |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Current liabilities:                                           |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Current portion of long-term bank loans (Note 16.e)            |  | Ps.               | 637,577    |   |                   | Ps. | 555,925    |  
|Concession taxes payable                                       |  |                   | 36,335     |   |                   |     | 32,227     |  
|Aeropuertos Mexicanos del Pacífico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (Note 29) |  |                   | 102,394    |   |                   |     | 85,321     |  
|Accounts payable (Note 15)                                     |  |                   | 316,233    |   |                   |     | 376,225    |  
|Taxes payable                                                  |  |                   | 23,765     |   |                   |     | 19,621     |  
|Income taxes payable (Note 14)                                 |  |                   | 95,850     |   |                   |     | 63,392     |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Total current liabilities                                      |  |                   | 1,212,154  |   |                   |     | 1,132,711  |  
|Deposits received in guarantee (Note 7)                        |  |                   | 522,204    |   |                   |     | 430,625    |  
|Employee benefits (Note 17)                                    |  |                   | 70,632     |   |                   |     | 60,290     |  
|Long-term bank loans (Note 16)                                 |  |                   | 1,216,899  |   |                   |     | 1,456,798  |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Total liabilities                                              |  |                   | 3,021,889  |   |                   |     | 3,080,424  |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Stockholders equity (Note 18):                                |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Common stock                                                   |  |                   | 15,447,322 |   |                   |     | 15,447,322 |  
|Legal reserve                                                  |  |                   | 635,914    |   |                   |     | 553,477    |  
|Reserve for repurchase of shares                               |  |                   | 2,027,302  |   |                   |     | 1,667,302  |  
|Repurchased shares                                             |  |                   | (1,664,034 | ) |                   |     | (1,387,302 | )
|Retained earnings                                              |  |                   | 5,766,207  |   |                   |     | 5,172,414  |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Total stockholders equity                                     |  |                   | 22,212,711 |   |                   |     | 21,453,213 |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|Total                                                          |  | Ps.               | 25,234,600 |   |                   | Ps. | 24,533,637 |  
|                                                               |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  

(Concluded)



F-3



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos, except per share amounts)



|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ---- | --- | ----------- | ---- |  | --- | ----------- | -
|                                                                  |  | 2013 |             |   | 2012 |     |             | 2011 | 
|Revenues (Note 19):                                               |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |     
|Aeronautical services                                             |  | Ps.  | 3,616,616   |   |      | Ps. | 3,365,982   |      |  | Ps. | 3,077,927   |  
|Non-aeronautical services                                         |  |      | 1,170,492   |   |      |     | 1,008,452   |      |  |     | 824,580     |  
|Improvements to concession assets                                 |  |      | 440,728     |   |      |     | 570,233     |      |  |     | 1,036,227   |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|                                                                  |  |      | 5,227,836   |   |      |     | 4,944,667   |      |  |     | 4,938,734   |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Operating costs:                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |     
|Cost of services (Note 20)                                        |  |      | 1,128,951   |   |      |     | 1,060,002   |      |  |     | 986,938     |  
|Technical assistance fees (Note 29)                               |  |      | 171,470     |   |      |     | 155,072     |      |  |     | 136,191     |  
|Concession taxes (Note 1.a)                                       |  |      | 237,728     |   |      |     | 217,295     |      |  |     | 193,802     |  
|Depreciation and amortization (Note 21)                           |  |      | 883,235     |   |      |     | 827,230     |      |  |     | 742,969     |  
|Cost of improvements to concession assets (Note 23)               |  |      | 440,728     |   |      |     | 570,233     |      |  |     | 1,036,227   |  
|Other (revenues) expenses  net                                   |  |      | (7,453      | ) |      |     | 1,333       |      |  |     | 6,587       |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|                                                                  |  |      | 2,854,659   |   |      |     | 2,831,165   |      |  |     | 3,102,714   |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Income from operations                                            |  |      | 2,373,177   |   |      |     | 2,113,502   |      |  |     | 1,836,020   |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Finance (cost) income  net (Note 24):                            |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |     
|Interest income                                                   |  |      | 124,223     |   |      |     | 122,078     |      |  |     | 108,445     |  
|Interest expense                                                  |  |      | (179,145    | ) |      |     | (121,319    | )    |  |     | (93,753     | )
|Exchange gain (loss)  net                                        |  |      | 3,763       |   |      |     | (14,782     | )    |  |     | 22,626      |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|                                                                  |  |      | (51,159     | ) |      |     | (14,023     | )    |  |     | 37,318      |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Income before income taxes                                        |  |      | 2,322,018   |   |      |     | 2,099,479   |      |  |     | 1,873,338   |  
|Income tax expense (Note 14.c):                                   |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |     
|Current                                                           |  |      | 653,565     |   |      |     | 551,760     |      |  |     | 480,523     |  
|Deferred                                                          |  |      | (577,777    | ) |      |     | (224,311    | )    |  |     | (218,765    | )
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|                                                                  |  |      | 75,788      |   |      |     | 327,449     |      |  |     | 261,758     |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Consolidated comprehensive income                                 |  | Ps.  | 2,246,230   |   |      | Ps. | 1,772,030   |      |  | Ps. | 1,611,580   |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding              |  |      | 530,061,831 |   |      |     | 530,720,600 |      |  |     | 537,755,093 |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  
|Basic and diluted earnings per share (in Mexican Pesos, Note 3.q) |  | Ps.  | 4.2377      |   |      | Ps. | 3.3389      |      |  | Ps. | 2.9969      |  
|                                                                  |  |      |             |   |      |     |             |      |  |     |             |  



F-4



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos)



|                                                                    |  |                 |             |  |              |  |                |                   |  |  |                 |  |  |                                |             |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  |               |  |  |  |                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | ----------- |  | ------------ |  | -------------- | ----------------- |  |  | --------------- |  |  | ------------------------------ | ----------- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------- | ------------------------- |  |  | ------------- |  |  |  | -------------- | 
|                                                                    |  | Number ofShares |             |  | Common
stock |  |                | Repurchasedshares |  |  | Legal
reserve   |  |  | Reserve forrepurchase ofshares |             |  | Retained
earnings |  |               | Total
stockholdersequity | 
|Balances as of January 1, 2011                                      |  |                 | 561,000,000 |  |              |  | Ps. 16,019,823 |                   |  |  | Ps. (609,809)   |  |  |                                | Ps. 404,247 |  |                   |  | Ps. 1,000,000 |                           |  |  | Ps. 5,067,952 |  |  |  | Ps. 21,882,213 | 
|Transfer of earnings to legal reserve (Note 18.g)                   |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                | 75,008      |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  | (75,008)      |  |  |  |               | 
|Reserve for repurchase of shares (Note 18.b)                        |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  | 387,302       |                           |  |  | (387,302)     |  |  |  |               | 
|Repurchase of 16,364,500 shares (Note 18.c)                         |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  | (777,493)       |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  |              |  |  |  | (777,493)      | 
|Dividends declared and paid, Ps. 1.9231 pesos per share (Note 18.b) |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (1,035,117)   |  |  |  | (1,035,117)    | 
|Comprehensive income                                                |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | 1,611,580     |  |  |  | 1,611,580      | 
|                                                                    |  |                 |             |  |              |  |                |                   |  |  |                 |  |  |                                |             |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  |               |  |  |  |                | 
|Balances as of December 31, 2011                                    |  |                 | 561,000,000 |  |              |  | 16,019,823     |                   |  |  | (1,387,302)     |  |  |                                | 479,255     |  |                   |  | 1,387,302     |                           |  |  | 5,182,105     |  |  |  | 21,681,183     | 
|Transfer of earnings to legal reserve (Note 18.g)                   |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                | 74,222      |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (74,222)      |  |  |  |               | 
|Dividends declared and paid, Ps. 2.1292 pesos per share (Note 18.d) |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (1,130,000)   |  |  |  | (1,130,000)    | 
|Reserve for repurchase of shares (Note 18.d)                        |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  | 280,000       |                           |  |  | (280,000)     |  |  |  |               | 
|Capital distribution (Note 18.e)                                    |  |                 |            |  |              |  | (572,501)      |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (297,499)     |  |  |  | (870,000)      | 
|Comprehensive income                                                |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | 1,772,030     |  |  |  | 1,772,030      | 
|                                                                    |  |                 |             |  |              |  |                |                   |  |  |                 |  |  |                                |             |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  |               |  |  |  |                | 
|Balances as of December 31, 2012                                    |  |                 | 561,000,000 |  |              |  | 15,447,322     |                   |  |  | (1,387,302)     |  |  |                                | 553,477     |  |                   |  | 1,667,302     |                           |  |  | 5,172,414     |  |  |  | 21,453,213     | 
|Transfer of earnings to legal reserve (Note 18.g)                   |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                | 82,437      |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (82,437)      |  |  |  |               | 
|Dividends declared and paid, Ps. 2.2837 pesos per share (Note 18.f) |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | (1,210,000)   |  |  |  | (1,210,000)    | 
|Reserve for repurchase of shares (Note 18.f)                        |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  | 360,000       |                           |  |  | (360,000)     |  |  |  |               | 
|Repurchase of 4,127,492 shares (Note 18.f)                          |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  | (276,732)       |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  |              |  |  |  | (276,732)      | 
|Comprehensive income                                                |  |                 |            |  |              |  |               |                   |  |  |                |  |  |                                |            |  |                   |  |              |                           |  |  | 2,246,230     |  |  |  | 2,246,230      | 
|                                                                    |  |                 |             |  |              |  |                |                   |  |  |                 |  |  |                                |             |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  |               |  |  |  |                | 
|Balances as of December 31, 2013                                    |  |                 | 561,000,000 |  |              |  | Ps. 15,447,322 |                   |  |  | Ps. (1,664,034) |  |  |                                | Ps. 635,914 |  |                   |  | Ps. 2,027,302 |                           |  |  | Ps. 5,766,207 |  |  |  | Ps. 22,212,711 | 
|                                                                    |  |                 |             |  |              |  |                |                   |  |  |                 |  |  |                                |             |  |                   |  |               |                           |  |  |               |  |  |  |                | 



F-5



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos)



|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                                         |  | 2013 |           |   | 2012 |     |           | 2011 | 
|Cash flows from operating activities:                                                                                                    |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Consolidated net income                                                                                                                  |  | Ps.  | 2,246,230 |   |      | Ps. | 1,772,030 |      |  | Ps. | 1,611,580  |  
|Adjustments for:                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Employee benefits                                                                                                                        |  |      | 10,342    |   |      |     | 12,393    |      |  |     | 11,541     |  
|Bad debt expense                                                                                                                         |  |      | 11,758    |   |      |     | 16,869    |      |  |     | 10,652     |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                                                                            |  |      | 883,235   |   |      |     | 827,230   |      |  |     | 742,969    |  
|Net loss on derivative financial instruments  net                                                                                       |  |      | 705       |   |      |     | 3,424     |      |  |     | 2,670      |  
|Interest expense on bank loans                                                                                                           |  |      | 115,612   |   |      |     | 102,136   |      |  |     | 57,220     |  
|Income tax expense                                                                                                                       |  |      | 75,788    |   |      |     | 327,449   |      |  |     | 261,758    |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      | 3,343,670 |   |      |     | 3,061,531 |      |  |     | 2,698,390  |  
|Changes in working capital:                                                                                                              |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|(Increase) decrease in:                                                                                                                  |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Financial investments held for trading purposes                                                                                          |  |      | 23,140    |   |      |     | (155,224  | )    |  |     | (44,434    | )
|Trade accounts receivable                                                                                                                |  |      | 25,523    |   |      |     | 32,838    |      |  |     | (9,009     | )
|Recoverable income tax and other current assets                                                                                          |  |      | 74,695    |   |      |     | 95,385    |      |  |     | 19,695     |  
|Recoverable income tax                                                                                                                   |  |      | 1,592     |   |      |     | (1,861    | )    |  |     | 23,022     |  
|Increase (decrease) in:                                                                                                                  |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Concession taxes payable                                                                                                                 |  |      | 4,108     |   |      |     | (1,266    | )    |  |     | 6,702      |  
|Aeropuertos Mexicanos del Pacífico, S.A.P.I. de C.V.                                                                                     |  |      | 17,073    |   |      |     | 13,871    |      |  |     | 6,666      |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                         |  |      | (13,057   | ) |      |     | 32,788    |      |  |     | 15,616     |  
|Taxes payable                                                                                                                            |  |      | 4,144     |   |      |     | 805       |      |  |     | 387        |  
|Deposits received in guarantee                                                                                                           |  |      | 91,579    |   |      |     | 114,226   |      |  |     | 89,977     |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Cash generated by operating activities                                                                                                   |  |      | 3,572,467 |   |      |     | 3,193,093 |      |  |     | 2,807,012  |  
|Income tax paid                                                                                                                          |  |      | (607,754  | ) |      |     | (531,819  | )    |  |     | (550,294   | )
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Net cash flows provided by operating activities                                                                                          |  |      | 2,964,713 |   |      |     | 2,661,274 |      |  |     | 2,256,718  |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Cash flows from investing activities:                                                                                                    |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Purchases of machinery, equipment, improvements on leased buildings, improvements to concession assets and advance payments to
suppliers |  |      | (686,270  | ) |      |     | (979,014  | )    |  |     | (1,255,036 | )
|Cash flows from sales of machinery and equipment                                                                                         |  |      | 677       |   |      |     | 4,251     |      |  |     | 4,032      |  
|Other investing activities                                                                                                               |  |      | 4,642     |   |      |     | (9,022    | )    |  |     | (2,466     | )
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  
|Net cash flows used in investing activities                                                                                              |  |      | (680,951  | ) |      |     | (983,785  | )    |  |     | (1,253,470 | )
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |     |           |      |  |     |            |  

(Continued)



F-6



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years
ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos)



|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | --- | ---------- | ---- |  | --- | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                     |  | 2013 |            |   | 2012 |     |            | 2011 | 
|Cash flows from financing activities:                                                                                |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Dividends declared and paid                                                                                          |  |      | (1,210,000 | ) |      |     | (1,130,000 | )    |  |     | (1,035,117 | )
|Capital distribution                                                                                                 |  |      |           |   |      |     | (870,000   | )    |  |     |           |  
|Repurchase of shares                                                                                                 |  |      | (276,732   | ) |      |     |           |      |  |     | (777,493   | )
|Proceeds from bank loans                                                                                             |  |      | 488,204    |   |      |     | 601,327    |      |  |     | 1,014,626  |  
|Payments on bank loans                                                                                               |  |      | (646,452   | ) |      |     | (612,222   | )    |  |     | (300,308   | )
|Interest paid on bank loans                                                                                          |  |      | (134,278   | ) |      |     | (137,921   | )    |  |     | (118,753   | )
|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Net cash flows used in financing activities                                                                          |  |      | (1,779,258 | ) |      |     | (2,148,816 | )    |  |     | (1,217,045 | )
|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                                                 |  |      | 504,504    |   |      |     | (471,327   | )    |  |     | (213,797   | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                                                                       |  |      | 1,663,683  |   |      |     | 2,135,010  |      |  |     | 2,348,807  |  
|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year                                                                         |  | Ps.  | 2,168,187  |   |      | Ps. | 1,663,683  |      |  | Ps. | 2,135,010  |  
|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Non-cash investing activities:                                                                                       |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  
|Purchases of machinery, equipment, improvements on leased buildings and improvements to concession assets on account |  | Ps.  | 135,386    |   |      | Ps. | 163,644    |      |  | Ps. | 276,443    |  
|                                                                                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |     |            |      |  |     |            |  

(Concluded)



F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011

(In thousands of Mexican Pesos)



|1. | Activities of the Company and significant events
|-- | ------------------------------------------------

Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries (the Company or GAP) was incorporated in May 1998 as a state-owned entity to manage, operate and develop 12 airport facilities, mainly in Mexicos Pacific region. The airports are located in the
following cities: Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta, Tijuana, Los Cabos, Silao (Guanajuato), Hermosillo, Mexicali, Los Mochis, La Paz, Manzanillo, Morelia and Aguascalientes. The Companys principal address is Mariano Otero Avenue 1249 B, six floor,
Rinconada del Bosque, zip code 44530, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.



| | a. | Activities
| | -- | ----------

The Company began operations on November 1, 1998. Prior to that date,
the Companys activities were carried out by Aeropuertos y Servicios Auxiliares (ASA), a Mexican Governmental agency, which was responsible for the operation of all public airports in Mexico.

In June 1998, the subsidiaries of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. were granted concessions by the Ministry of
Communications and Transportation (SCT) to manage, operate and develop each of the Pacific Groups 12 airports and benefit from the use of the airport facilities, for a 50-year term beginning November 1, 1998. The cost of the concessions,
which totaled Ps.15,938,359, was determined by the Mexican Government in August 1999, based upon the price paid by Aeropuertos Mexicanos del Pacífico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (AMP, the strategic stockholder of the Company) for its interests in GAP.
On August 20, 1999, GAP entered into a Liabilities Assumption Agreement with each of its subsidiaries, whereby it assumed the liabilities incurred by each subsidiary derived from obtaining the concession. Such liabilities were capitalized by
GAP as equity in favor of the Mexican Government on such date.

The term of the concessions may be extended under certain circumstances by
the SCT, for terms not to exceed an additional 50 years. Beginning on November 1, 1998, the Company is required to pay an annual tax to the Mexican Government, through the SCT, for use of the public property, equivalent to 5% of each
concessionaires annual gross revenues, according to the concession terms and the Mexican Federal Duties Law.

Title to all of the
long-term fixed assets within the airports is retained by the Mexican Government. Accordingly, upon expiration of the term of the concessions granted to the Company, the assets, including all of the improvements made to the airport facilities during
the term of the concessions, shall automatically revert to the Mexican Government. Additionally, ASA and other agencies of the Mexican Government maintain the rights to provide certain services such as air traffic control, fuel supply and
immigration control.

On February 24, 2006, the Company made an initial public offering of its Series B shares, under which the
Mexican Government, which held 85% of the voting common stock of the Company sold its 100% shares participation, both in the United States of America, via the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and in Mexico, via the Mexican Stock Exchange (BMV).
Consequently, as of such date, the Company became a public entity in both Mexico and in the United States of America and is required to meet various legal obligations and regulations for public entities applicable in each country.



F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

| | b. | Significant events
| | -- | ------------------



| |  |  | At an Ordinary General Stockholders Meeting held on April 16, 2012, the stockholders approved a dividend payment of Ps. 1,130,000 to be divided between each of the shares outstanding at the date of payment,
excluding shares repurchased by the Company, in each date of payment in accordance with article 56 of Securities Market Law. The first dividend payment of Ps. 847,500 was made on May 31, 2012 and the second dividend payment of Ps. 282,500 was
made on November 1, 2012, as mentioned in Note 18.d.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On August 2, 2012, the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement with BBVA Bancomer, S.A. (BBVA Bancomer), with cross guarantees between the airports accredited for Ps. 242,747, for Bajio, Guadalajara,
Hermosillo, Puerto Vallarta and San Jose del Cabo airports, which will be used to finance capital investments committed in the Master Development Plan (MDP) for the year 2012. The credit was disbursed at different dates, which are disclosed in Note
16.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On October 3, 2012, the Company made a payment for Ps. 870,000 of the capital reduction of Ps.1.639281 per outstanding share, which was approved at the Extraordinary General Stockholders Meeting on
25 September 2012, as disclosed in Note 18.e.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On November 23, 2012, the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement with BBVA Bancomer with cross guarantees between the airports accredited for Ps. 287,799, for San Jose del Cabo, Puerto Vallarta,
Guadalajara, Hermosillo and Bajio airports. The credit will be available at different dates, which are disclosed in Note 16.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On December 7 and 23, 2012, the Company paid in advance the outstanding balances of the credit loans disbursed on June 7, 2011 and December 23, 2011 for Ps. 77,910 and Ps. 105,329, respectively, relating
to the credit agreement signing with Banco Nacional de México, S.A. (Banamex) on June 6, 2011.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On January 11, 2013, the Company paid in advance the outstanding balance of the credit loans disbursed on July 11, 2011, relating to the credit agreement signing with Banamex on June 6, 2011. This payment
was made for Ps. 104,560, thereby this loan was paid in full.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On April 10, 2013, the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement with BBVA Bancomer with cross guarantees between the airports of Ps. 459,350, for the Bajío, Guadalajara, Hermosillo, Puerto Vallarta
and San Jose del Cabo airports, which will be used to finance capital investments committed in the MDP for the 2013 and 2014 periods. The credit was disbursed at different dates, which are disclosed in Note 16. On December 31, 2013 the Company
has been disposed Ps. 305,354.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | At an Ordinary General Stockholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, the stockholders approved a dividend payment of Ps. 1,210,000 to be divided between each of the shares outstanding at the date of payment,
excluding shares repurchased by the Company, in each date of payment in accordance with article 56 of Securities Market Law. The first dividend payment of Ps. 907,500 was made on April 25, 2013 and the second dividend payment of Ps. 302,500 was
made on November 27, 2013, as mentioned in Note 18.f.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On May 7, 2013, Fundación Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, A.C. (Fundación GAP) was established as a nonprofit company for the aim of improving social welfare in the communities surrounding
our airports. It will focus on childrens education and other philanthropic activities.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On December 9, 2013, the Company paid in advance the outstanding balance of the credit loan disbursed on December 9, 2009, corresponding to the first disbursement for Ps. 30,804, relating to the credit
agreement signing with Banamex on December 9, 2009. With the payment, this loan was liquidated in full.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | On December 10, 2013, the Company paid in advance the outstanding balance of the credit loan disbursed on December 10, 2009, corresponding to the first disbursement for Ps. 30,804, relating to the credit
agreement signing with HSBC México, S.A. (HSBC) on December 10, 2009. With the payment, this loan was liquidated in full.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Basis of presentation
|-- | ---------------------



| | a. | Statement of Compliance These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), its amendments and interpretations issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued and outstanding or issued and early adopted at the date of preparation of these financial statements.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | Translation into English  The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been translated from Spanish into English for use outside of Mexico.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | c. | Basis of measurementThe consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for the following significant accounts: i) certain financial instruments
recognized at fair value, ii) the liability for postemployment benefits, which is recognized net of unrecognized costs for past services and the present value of the obligation for such benefits, and iii) certain financial liabilities recognized at
amortized cost.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The different measurement principles utilized include the following:



| |  |  | Historical cost  Historical cost is generally based on the fair value of the amount given in exchange for assets.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Fair value  The fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the valuation date.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Present value  Some financial assets are recorded at the discounted present value of future cash inflows that those assets are expected to generate in the ordinary course of business. Liabilities are recorded at
the discounted present value of future cash outflows required to settle these liabilities in the ordinary course of business.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Amortized cost The amortized cost of a financial asset or financial liability is the amount at which the financial asset or financial liability is measured at initial recognition minus principal repayments, using
the effective interest method of any difference between that initial amount and the maturity amount, and minus any reduction (directly or through the use of an allowance account) for impairment or uncollectability.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

| | d. | Consolidation of financial statements The consolidated financial statements include those of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. and its subsidiaries, for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, of which it owns 99.99% of the shares representing their common stock. The consolidated subsidiaries are as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Aguascalientes, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto del Bajio, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Guadalajara, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Hermosillo, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de La Paz, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Los Mochis, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Manzanillo, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Morelia, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Puerto Vallarta, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de San Jose del Cabo, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeropuerto de Tijuana, S.A. de C.V.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | Corporativo de Servicios Aeroportuarios, S.A. de C.V. (CORSA)
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Fundación Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, A.C. (Fundación GAP)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | GA del Pacífico Partipacoes do Brasil LTDA
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Puerta Cero Parking, S.A. de C.V. (PCP)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | Servicios a la Infraestructura Aeroportuaria del Pacífico, S.A. de C.V. (SIAP)
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All
significant intercompany balances, transactions and investments have been eliminated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company has power to control when the investment is exposed or has rights, to variable returns from its
involvement in the subsidiary and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over these. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing whether the
Company controls another entity. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company, and are no longer consolidated from the date that control is lost.



| | e. | New and revised IFRS that are mandatorily effective for the year ending December 31, 2013  During the year ending December 31, 2012, the Company early adopted the following IFRS:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements. This standard is part of a package of five standards that came into effective on January 1, 2013 (IFRS 10, IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12 Disclosure of
Interests in Other Entities, IAS 27 (as revised in 2011) Separate Financial Statements,and IAS 28 (as revised in 2011) Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, which were adopted at the same time.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | IAS 19 Employee Benefits (as revised in 2011).
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------

The adoption of these standards had no
significant impact on the financial statements.

During 2013, the following standards came into effect as of January 1, 2013: IFRS 7
Financial Instruments: DisclosuresOffsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement and IAS 1Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Incomewhich are detailed below:

Amendments to the IFRS 7Disclosures  Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The amendment to the IFRS 7 requires disclosure of information about recognized financial instruments, subject to
enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements

The amendments to IFRS 7 apply retroactively. Since the Company does not
have any offsetting agreement, the application of the amendments had no significant effect on the disclosures or the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements.



F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

IFRS 13Fair Value Measurement

IFRS 13 establishes a single source of guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures about fair value measurements. The scope of IFRS 13
is broad; the fair value measurement requirements of IFRS 13 apply to both financial instrument items and non-financial instrument items for which other IFRSs require, or permit, fair value measurements and disclosures about fair value measurements.
Except for share-based payment transactions that are within the scope of IFRS 2 Share-Based Payment, leasing transactions that are within the scope of IAS 17 Leases, and measurements that have some similarities to fair value, but are
not fair value (ie net realizable value for the purposes of measuring inventories or value in use for impairment assessment purposes).

IFRS 13 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction in
the principal (or most advantageous) market at the measurement date under current market conditions. Fair value under IFRS 13 is an exit price regardless of whether that price is directly observable or estimated using another valuation technique.
Also, IFRS 13 includes widespread disclosure requirements.

IFRS 13 requires prospectively application from January 1, 2013. In
addition, specific transitional provisions were given to entities such that they need not apply the disclosure requirements set out in the Standard in comparative information provided for periods before the initial application of the Standard. In
accordance with these transitional provisions, the Company has not made any new disclosures required by IFRS 13 for the comparative periods. The application of IFRS 13 has not had any material impact on the amounts recognized in the consolidated
financial statements.

Amendments to IAS 1Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive IncomeThe
amendments to IAS 1 introduce new terminology for the statement of comprehensive income and income statement. Under the amendments to IAS 1, a statement of comprehensive income is renamed as a statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income, and an income statement is renamed as a statement of profit or loss. The amendments to IAS 1 retain the option to present profit or loss and other comprehensive income in either a single statement
or in two separate but consecutive statements. However, the amendments to IAS 1 require additional disclosures to be made in the other comprehensive income section such that items of other comprehensive income are grouped into the following two
categories: (a) Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss and (b) Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss when specific conditions are met. Income tax on items of other comprehensive income is
required to be allocated on the same basis, the amendments do not change the option to present items of other comprehensive income either before tax or net of tax. The amendments require retrospective application and therefore the presentation of
items of other comprehensive income has been modified to reflect the changes. In addition to the mentioned above changes in presentation, the application of the amendments to IAS 1 does not result in any impact on results of operations, other
comprehensive income, nor the total of comprehensive income.



| | f. | Functional and presentation currency The consolidated financial statements and notes as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, are
prepared in pesos, which is the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries and are presented in thousands of pesos.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | g. | Use of estimates and critical judgments in preparing the financial statements The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies relating to the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses of the relevant period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Information on the uncertainty in
the use of assumptions and estimates that have a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the next financial year are included in the following notes:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Estimation of doubtful accounts (Note 7)
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------



| |  |  | Definition of useful lives and depreciation and amortization periods (Note 3 incises c. and d.)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Probability of recovery of tax loss (Note 14.f)
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Recovery of tax on assets paid in prior years (Note 14.i)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Assumptions used to determine liabilities for retirement benefits (Note 17)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Contingency liabilities (Note 26)
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition to the estimates, the Company makes critical judgments in applying its accounting
policies, which have a material effect on the amounts recognized in the financial statements. Management believes that the decisions made are the most reasonable based on information available, on the judgments made and the way it manages the
operation of the Company. Critical judgments relate to the following:

Accounting for the Concession  Management believes it has
carried out a comprehensive implementation of the standards applicable to the accounting treatment of its concession and has determined that, among others, International Financial Reporting Interpretation (IFRIC) 12 Service Concession
Arrangementsis applicable to the Company. The Company treats its investments related to improvements and upgrades to be performed in connection with the MDP under the intangible asset model established by IFRIC 12 and does not recognize a
provision for maintenance, as all investments required by the MDP, regardless of their nature, directly increase the Maximum Tariff per traffic unit (MT). Accordingly, all amounts invested under the MDP have a direct correlation to the amount of
fees the Company will be able to charge each passenger or cargo service provider, and thus, a direct correlation to the amount of revenues the Company will be able to generate. As result, management defines all expenditures associated with
investments required by the MDP as revenue generating activities given that they ultimately provide future benefits, whereby subsequent improvements and upgrades made to the concession are recognized as intangible assets based on the principles of
IFRIC 12. Additionally, compliance with the committed investments per the MDP is mandatory, as well as the fulfillment of the MT and therefore, in case of default in any of these obligations (MDP or MT), the Company could be subject to sanctions and
even its concession could be revoked. To determine the amortization period of the intangible associated with the improvements and upgrades made to comply with the MDP, the Company focuses on the period over which they will generate future economic
benefits or the concession term, whichever is less.



| | h. | Income from operations This line item is comprised by total revenues less operating costs. Although this presentation is not required by IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements, it
is included in the consolidate statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income because it represents a reliable measure of the economic and financial performance of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i. | Comprehensive income Comprehensive income comprised the net income of the period, plus other comprehensive income (loss) items of the same period. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012
and 2011, comprehensive income is represented only by the net income of each year.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | j. | Classification of cost and expenses Costs and expenses presented in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income were classified according to their nature.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Summary of significant accounting policies
|-- | ------------------------------------------

The consolidated financial statements comply
with IFRS as issued by the IASB. Its preparation requires management to make certain estimates and use certain assumptions that affect certain items of the consolidated financial statements and their related disclosures required therein. However,
actual results could differ from those estimates. The Companys management, upon applying professional judgment, considers that estimates and assumptions used were adequate under the circumstances (Note 2.f). The significant accounting policies
of the Company are as follows:



| | a. | Financial assets and liabilities
| | -- | --------------------------------

Financial assets Financial assets
are recognized when the Company becomes a contractual party to the terms of the related instruments.



F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

Financial assets are initially measured at fair value. Transaction costs that are directly
attributable to the acquisition or issuance of financial assets (other than financial assets at fair value through profit or loss) are added to or deducted from the fair value of the financial assets, as appropriate, on initial recognition.
Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) are recognized immediately in profit or loss.

The Companys financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: i) FVTPL and ii) accounts receivable. The
classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition. All regular way purchases or sales of financial assets are recognized and derecognized on a trade date basis. Regular way
of purchases or sales, are purchases or sales of financial assets that require delivery of assets within the time frame established by regulation or convention in the marketplace.



| |  |  | Financial assets at FVTPL  Financial assets are classified as at FVTPL when the financial asset is either held for trading or it is designated as at FVTPL.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A financial asset is classified as held for trading if:



| |  |  | It has been acquired principally for the purpose of selling it in the near term; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | In its initial recognition, it is part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that the Company manages together and has a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking; or
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | It is a derivative that is not designated and is effective as a hedging instrument.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial
assets at FVTPL are stated at fair value, with any gain or loss arising on remeasurement is recognized in profit or loss. The net gain or loss recognized in profit or loss includes any dividend or interest earned from the financial asset and is
included in the finance income in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. Fair value is determined in the manner described in Note 6.



| |  |  | Accounts receivable  Trade accounts receivable and other receivables, with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market are classified as receivables. Interest income is recognized by
applying the effective interest rate, except for the short term receivables, in the event that the recognition of interest is not material.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the estimated future cash receipts (including all professional fees and basis points
paid or received that are part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) for the expected life of the instrument, or when is appropriate a shorter period, to the net carrying amount at initial recognition.

Financial liabilities and equity instruments Financial liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a
contractual party to the terms of the related instruments.

Financial liabilities and are initially measured at fair value. Transaction
costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue of the financial liabilities (other than financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss) are added to or deducted from the fair value of the financial liabilities, as
appropriate, on its initial recognition. Transaction costs directly attributable to the acquisition of financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognized immediately in profit or loss.

Debt and equity instruments are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual
arrangements.



| |  |  | Equity instruments  An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are
recognized at the resources received, net of direct costs from the emission.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Repurchase of the Companys common stock
is recognized and deducted directly in equity. No gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss at the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Companys own equity instruments.



F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Financial liabilities  Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities at FVTPL or as other financial liabilities. At the date of the financial statements, the Company does not have liabilities at
FVTPL.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other financial liabilities (including borrowings and trade accounts payable) are subsequently measured at amortized
cost, using the effective interest rate method.

The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a
financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments exactly (or as appropriate in a short term) with the net book value on its initial
recognition.

The Company derecognizes financial liabilities when, and only when, the Companys obligations are discharged, cancelled
or they expire. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability derecognized and the amount paid and payable is recognized in profit or loss.

Even when the Company has the right, in certain cases, for a compensation of financial assets and liabilities, as of the date of this
consolidated financial statements, the Company does not have the intention of compensate a liability with an asset, nor expect in a short term may require it. Therefore, deposits received in guarantee are presented separately from accounts
receivable.



| | b. | Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist mainly of bank deposits in checking accounts and readily available daily investments of cash
surpluses with immediate availability invested in Mexican Treasury Bills (CETES), as well as cash equivalents designated for expenditure, held in trust, which are available for immediate use but have been designated for a particular purpose (see
Note 5). Cash is stated at nominal value and cash equivalents are valued at fair value; generated yields and fluctuations in value are recognized as interest income as earned.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | c. | Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Recognition and valuation  Machinery, equipment and improvements to leased buildings are recognized at acquisition cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. The acquisition cost
includes expenses directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When significant parts of an asset of machinery,
equipment and improvements to leased buildings have different useful lives, they are accounted for separately as a component of the asset.

Gains and losses from sales or retirements of machinery, equipment and improvements to leased buildings are determined comparing the proceeds
from the sale or retirement against net amount of machinery, equipment and improvements to leased buildings and are recognized net in other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.



| |  |  | Subsequent costs  The cost to replace a part or item of machinery, equipment and improvements to leased buildings are recognized in the value of the asset when it is probable that future economic benefits
associated with that part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The net value of the replaced item is derecognized at its net book value. Minor maintenance costs are recognized in earnings as incurred.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Depreciation  Depreciation is calculated over the depreciable amount, which is the cost of an asset, or other substitute value of that cost, since this is the value that reflects more certainty the expected
pattern of consumption of future economic benefits implicit in the active. The Company does not determine residual values for machinery, equipment, improvements and leased buildings as they are not considered to be material.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Depreciation of machinery and equipment is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and is calculated under the
straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets. Also, improvements to leased buildings are amortized by the straight-line method based on the remaining useful life of the improvements or the lease term, whichever is less. The
estimated useful life and the depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each year, and the effect of any changes in the estimate recorded is recognized on a prospective basis.



F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

The estimated useful lives for the current period and comparative period are as follows:



|                                 |  |                    |  |                               
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|                                 |  | Useful life(years) |  | Average annualdepreciationrate
|Machinery and equipment          |  | 10                 |  | 10%                           
|Office furniture and equipment   |  | 10                 |  | 10%                           
|Computer equipment               |  | 3.3                |  | 30%                           
|Transportation equipment         |  | 4                  |  | 25%                           
|Communication equipment          |  | 10 - 4 - 3.3       |  | 10% - 25% - 30%               
|Improvements on leased buildings |  | 10                 |  | 10%                           



| | d. | Intangible Assets
| | -- | -----------------



| |  |  | Improvements to concession assets  Improvements to concession assets are accounted for the improvements that are made pursuant to the MDP and improvements carried out by the daily operation of the Companys
airports. All infrastructure investments made by the airports will be delivered to the Mexican government at the end of the term of the Concession. Under the Companys concession agreements, through the Master Development Programs agreed with
the Mexican government every five years, the Company is committed to carry out various improvements, upgrades and additions to each of its airports on an annual basis. In exchange for investing in those additions and upgrades, the Mexican government
grants the Company the right to obtain benefits for services provided using those assets. The Company, as the operator of the concession assets, recognizes an intangible asset as it receives a right granted by the Mexican government to charge users
of the public service associated with the use of its airports.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Airport concessions  The Company recognized an intangible asset of the Concession granted by the SCT to manage and operate each of the airports for 50 years since its acquisition.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Rights to use airport facilities  Rights to use airport facilities are recorded at acquisition cost of the assets recorded by ASA and transferred to the Company according to the Concession granted, in order to
manage, operate and exploit them during the Concession term.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Other acquired rights  These rights correspond to payments made by the Company after the date the Concessions were granted, in order to early-terminate certain long-term leases contracts that existed at that time
between ASA and third-party leaseholders, these rights are recorded at its acquisition cost.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Amortization  After to its initial recognition, intangible assets are valued at acquisition cost plus capitalized borrowing costs that are recognized, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment
losses. Depreciation is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income under the straight line method applied to the shorter of the estimated period of future economic benefits the intangible assets will generate, or the concession
period, from the date they are available for use.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amortization periods for the current and comparative period are as
follows:



|                                  |  |                |  |                                
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------
|                                  |  | Period
(years) |  | Average annualamortization rate
|Improvements to concession assets |  | 12.5 - 20      |  | 5% - 8%                        
|Airport concessions               |  | 49             |  | 2%                             
|Rights to use airport facilities  |  | 10 - 49        |  | 10% - 2%                       
|Other acquired rights             |  | 44 - 48        |  | 2%                             

The amortization method and useful lives are reviewed at each year end date and adjusted prospectively if
necessary.



F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

| | e. | Capitalized borrowing costs Borrowing costs directly attributable to qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use are
capitalized as part of the cost of the related asset. In determining the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization during a period, any investment income earned on such funds is deducted from the borrowing costs incurred.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | f. | Impairment
| | -- | ----------



| |  |  | Financial assets  A financial asset that is not recognized at FVTPL is evaluated by the Company at the close of each reporting period to determine whether there is evidence of potential impairment. A financial
asset is impaired if there is objective evidence that a loss has occurred after the initial recognition of the asset and that loss has a negative effect on the estimated future cash flows of the asset, that can be estimated reliably.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For all other financial assets, objective evidence of impairment could include:



| |  |  | Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Breach in the payment of the interests or the loan; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | It is probable that the borrower will enter in bankruptcy or into a financial reorganization; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An impairment loss on financial assets carried at amortized cost is calculated as the difference between the assets carrying amount and
the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. Losses are recognized in earnings and are reflected in the allowance for doubtful accounts included in cost of services. When a subsequent event
causes the amount of impairment loss to reverse, such amount is recognized in current earnings on a prospective basis and cannot exceed the amount of the impairment previously recognized.

Individually significant financial assets are tested one by one for impairment. The remaining financial assets are assessed in groups of
similar credit risk characteristics.

For financial assets that are carried at cost, the amount of the impairment loss is measured as the
difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future cash flows discounted at the current market rate of return for a similar financial asset. Such impairment loss will not be reversed in subsequent
periods.

All impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated statement of profit and loss and other comprehensive income.

A reversal of an impairment loss occurs only if it can be associated objectively to an event that occurred after the date the loss was
recognized.



| |  |  | Non-financial assets  Non-financial assets of the Company are assessed at each period end date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If there is such an indication of impairment, management
estimates the recoverable amount.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the higher of asset value
in use and net selling price. To determine the assets value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to present value using an appropriate discount rate before tax that reflects current market conditions in relation to the time
value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating unit). An impairment loss is recognized
immediately in profit and loss.



F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

The Companys individual airports cannot be considered as separate cash-generating units,
as the bidding process for the concession made by the Mexican Federal Government included the package of twelve airports, and therefore the Company is required to operate and maintain all 12 airports independently of the results they generate
individually. Considering the above, if there are indicators of impairment exist, the Company performs an impairment assessment at a consolidated basis.

When an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised
estimated recoverable amount, so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had an impairment loss not been recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of
an impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit and loss, unless the relevant asset is recognized on a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.



| | g. | Derivative financial instruments The Company occasionally uses derivative financial instruments, specifically interest rate caps, to hedge its exposure to interest rate risk arising primarily from
debt instruments.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date the derivative contract are entered into
and subsequently valued at fair value at the end of each reporting period. The gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss immediately unless the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument and is considered to be effective. The timing of the
recognition of the hedging instrument in earnings will depend on the nature of the hedge.

The Company may designate certain instruments as
hedges for accounting purposes if at inception of the hedge, the Company documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management and management strategy objectives for undertaking various hedging
transactions. Additionally, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company documents whether the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting the exposure to changes in fair value or changes in cash flows of the hedged
item.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Company revokes the hedging relationship, when the hedging instrument expires or is sold,
terminated, or exercised, or when it fails to meet the criteria for hedge accounting. Any cumulative gain or loss on the hedging instrument that has been recognized in equity remains in equity until the forecasted transaction is ultimately
recognized in profit or loss. When management no longer expects the forecasted transaction to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recognized immediately in profit or loss.



| | h. | Other intangible assets Costs incurred in the development phase, as well as other intangible assets that meet certain requirements and that the Company has determined will have future economic
benefits, are capitalized and amortized based on the straight-line method. Expenditures that do not meet such requirements, as well as research costs, are recorded in the results of the period in which they are incurred.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i. | Leases The payments made by the Company as a lessee under operating leases are recognized in the consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the
lease term. Lease incentives received are recognized, as applicable, as a decrease in overall rental costs over the term of the contract. The Company does not have finance leases either as a lessee or lessor. The Companys accounting policy as
a lessor is disclosed in Note 3.m.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | j. | Provisions Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the
obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The amount recognized as a provision is the
best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. When a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated
to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows.



F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be
recovered from a third party, an account receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.

Provisions are classified as current or noncurrent based on the period of time estimated to meet the obligations covered.



| | k. | Direct employee benefits Liabilities for direct employee benefits are recognized based on the services rendered by employees, considering their most recent salaries. These benefits primarily include
statutory employee profit sharing (PTU) payable, compensated absences, vacation and vacation premium and incentives. The PTU is recorded in the income year in which it is incurred and presented under cost of services in the consolidated statements
of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | l. | Employee benefits The seniority premium liability and severance of the personnel to the retirement age are calculated by independent actuaries at the projected unit credit method using nominal
interest rates. Due to its impact is not material, actuarial gains and losses generated during the year are recognized directly in the profit or loss.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The past service cost is recognized in the profit or loss in the year of the plan amendment. Interest is calculated using the discount rate at
the beginning of the period the balance of the defined benefit obligation. Defined benefit costs are classified as follows:



| |  |  | Cost of service (including current service cost, past service cost and gains and losses on reductions and compensations).
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Interest expenses.
| | - |  | ------------------



| |  |  | Remeasurements.
| | - |  | ---------------

The Company present the first two components of defined benefit cost as an
expense in cost of services. The reduction and early liquidation of obligations are recognized as past service costs. Remeasurements are reflected immediately in the statement of financial position as a charge or credit to other comprehensive income
in the period they are incurred and are not reclassified to income.



| | m. | Revenue recognition Aeronautical and non-aeronautical revenues are recognized at their fair value, within a maximum thirty-day term subsequent to the time passengers depart, planes land or other
services are provided, as the case may be, considering that the events that occur and services that are rendered in any given month are invoiced and recognized within that same month.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Aeronautical services  The majority of the Companys revenues are derived from rendering aeronautical services, related to the use of airport facilities by airlines and passengers. These revenues are
regulated by the SCT through a maximum rate per workload unit. A workload unit is currently equivalent to one terminal passenger or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Revenues from non-aeronautical services consist mainly of the leasing of commercial space at the airport terminals (other than space deemed essential to airline operations), car parking, access fees charged to third
parties providing food catering and other services at the airports, and other miscellaneous revenues.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commercial space
within the terminals is leased through operating lease agreements, based on either a monthly fixed rent or a charge based on the higher of a minimum monthly rent or a percentage of the lessees monthly revenues. Rental income from the
Companys leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant lease.



| |  |  | Revenues and cost of improvements to concession assets  In conformity with IFRIC 12, the Company recognizes revenues and the associated costs of
improvements to concession assets which it is obligated to perform at the airports as established by the MDP. Revenues represent the value of the exchange between the Company and the government with respect to the improvements, given that the
Company constructs or provides improvements to the airports as obligated under the MDP and in exchange, the government grants the Company the right to obtain benefits for services provided using those assets. The Company has determined that its
obligations
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

| | per the MDP should be considered to be a revenue-earning activity as all expenditures incurred to fulfill the MDP are included in the maximum tariff it charges its customers and therefore it
recognizes the revenue and expense in profit or loss when the expenditures are performed. The cost for such additions and improvements to concession assets is based on actual costs incurred by the Company in the execution of the additions or
improvements, considering the investment requirements in the MDP. Through bidding processes, the Company contracts third parties to carry out such construction. The amount of revenues for these services are equal to the amount of costs incurred, as
the Company does not obtain any profit margin for these construction services. The amounts paid are set at market value.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | n. | Foreign currency transactions Foreign currency transactions are recorded at the exchange rate in effect on the day before the transaction date, published by the Central Bank of Mexico in the Federal
Official Gazette (the difference between exchange rates in effect at the transaction date and the rates used by the Company are not considered material).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into Mexican pesos at the applicable exchange rate in effect at
the consolidated statement of financial position date. Exchange fluctuations are recognized as interest income as earned in the finance cost, as exchange gain or loss.



| | o. | Income taxes Corporate income tax (ISR) and the Business Flat Tax (IETU) include both the current tax and deferred tax. Deferred and current tax are recognized the consolidated statement of profit
or loss and other comprehensive income, except when they are relate to items recognized in other comprehensive income, or directly in equity, in that case the deferred and current tax are also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in
equity, respectively.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current tax expense is the tax payable determined for the year, using tax rates enacted or
substantially enacted at the reporting date, plus any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous years. Taxable income differs from income before income taxes reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income because there are
items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and items that will never be taxable or deductible.

The Company
determines the deferred tax, based on its financial projections. Deferred income tax is calculated by applying the statutory rate for temporary differences, resulting from comparing the accounting and tax assets and liabilities, and when applicable,
the benefits from tax loss carryforwards and certain tax credits, such as the Tax on Assets (IMPAC) paid in previous years and expected to be recovered in future periods in accordance with the rules established in the tax laws, to the extent that it
is probable the existence of future taxable profit that can be applied against such tax benefits. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the tax benefit can be
recognized.

The rates applied to determine the deferred tax are those that correspond to the year in which it is expected the reversal of
the temporary difference.

As a consequence of the 2014 Tax Reform, as of December 31, 2013, deferred IETU is no longer recognized, as
such, those effects were cancelled affecting the 2013 results.

The Company did not recognized deferred taxes for the following items:



| |  |  | Initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor tax results.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future and where the Company has the power to control the reversal date.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | p. | Earnings per share Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing consolidated net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, adjusted by repurchased
shares retained in treasury. The Company does not have any dilutive securities; therefore basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-20



---

##### Table of Contents

| | q. | Finance income and cost Finance income comprises interest income from investments in debt securities, changes in the market value of financial assets at FVTPL and gains on hedging instruments that
are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, among other concepts. Interest income is recognized when it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the amount can be reliably measured. Interest
income is recorded on a regular basis, with reference to the capital invested and the effective interest rate.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Finance costs
comprise interest costs of loans net of interest cost capitalized on qualifying assets, changes in the market value of financial assets at FVTPL, losses on hedging instruments that are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income, interest paid to the tax authorities, among other items. Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
income, using the effective interest method.



| | r. | Operating segments An operating segment is a component of the Company that is engaged in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses
relating to transactions with other components of the Company. All operating results of the operating segments are regularly reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer for making decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its
performance and for which specific financial information is available. Each of the airports of the Company represents an operating segment.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Financial risk management
|-- | -------------------------

The Company is exposed, among other, to the following risks
from the use of financial instruments:



| |  |  | Credit risk
| | - |  | -----------



| |  |  | Liquidity risk
| | - |  | --------------



| |  |  | Market risk
| | - |  | -----------

This note presents information about the Companys exposure to each of the
above risks, the objectives, policies and processes of measuring and risk management of the Company. In different sections of these financial statements the Company has included additional in-depth disclosures.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, financial instruments held by the Company are comprised of the following:



|                                                |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --------- |  | ----------------- | --- | --------- | 
|                                                |  | December 31,
2013 |           |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Financial assets                                |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|Cash and cash equivalents                       |  | Ps.               | 2,168,187 |  |                   | Ps. | 1,663,683 | 
|Financial investments held for trading purposes |  |                   | 410,433   |  |                   |     | 433,573   | 
|Receivables                                     |  |                   | 207,515   |  |                   |     | 244,796   | 
|Derivative financial instruments                |  |                   | 340       |  |                   |     | 1,045     | 
|Financial liabilities at amortized cost         |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|Current and long term bank loans                |  | Ps.               | 1,854,476 |  |                   | Ps. | 2,012,723 | 
|Accounts payable                                |  |                   | 418,627   |  |                   |     | 461,546   | 

Financial risk management objectivesThe board of directors is responsible for
developing and monitoring the Companys risk management policies.

The Companys risk management policies are established to
identify and analyze potential risks, to set appropriate limits and controls, to monitor such risk on an ongoing basis. Policies and risk management systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Companys
activities. The Company, through its training and management standards and procedures, aims to develop an environment of disciplined and constructive control in which all employees understand their roles and obligations.

The Audit Committee of the Company supervises how management monitors compliance with policies, procedures and reviews risks that is
appropriate to the risk management framework in relation to the risks faced by the Company. The Audit Committee is supported in its oversight role by the Companys Internal Audit Function. Internal Audit performs routine and special reviews of
controls and risk management procedures, and reports its results directly to the Audit Committee.



F-21



---

##### Table of Contents

Credit risk Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will
default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Company and arises primarily for trade accounts receivable and the Companys investments, including investment funds and derivative financial instruments.



| |  |  | Receivables  The Companys exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. However, management also considers the demographic characteristics of its customers,
including the default risk of the industry and country in which its customers operate, as these factors could also affect credit risk, particularly considering the recent economic downturn. The main source of income for the Company is the Passenger
Charge Fees (Tarifa de Uso Aeroportuario, TUA) and leasing revenues from commercial areas in its airports. The TUA is charged to each departing passenger (except diplomat, infant or transit passenger), and is collected by the airlines and
subsequently refunded to the airports. At December, 31 2013 and 2012 the revenues for TUA represented 58.8% and 57.1% of the total revenues, respectively. The leasing revenues from commercial areas are collected from other clients, which are not
airline customers. Approximately 33.4% and 31.5% of the Companys revenues in 2013 and 2012 are derived from the TUA collected by three major client airlines, which collect the TUA and remit it to the airports. However, geographically there is
nominal geographical risk concentration because its airports are in different cities in Mexico, and therefore if one airport has an operating problem the other airports would not be affecting. Approximately 35.4% and 35.7% of aeronautical and
non-aeronautical revenues earned during the periods ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were generated by the Guadalajara airport. In addition, approximately 91.2% and 90.9% of aeronautical and non aeronautical revenues earned during the periods
ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were generated by six of the Companys airports (Guadalajara, Tijuana, San Jose del Cabo, Puerto Vallarta, Bajio and Hermosillo).
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company has a credit policy under which each new customer is analyzed individually for creditworthiness before offering the standard terms
and conditions of payment and delivery of the services provided by the Company. The review of the Company includes external ratings, when they are available, and in some cases bank references. Every customer has established credit limits, which must
be approved by the Companys management and are reviewed periodically.

The Company has entered into agreements with all its airline
customers to collect the TUA, by who receive the payment for the use of the airport services on behalf of the airports. According to these agreements, each customer airline could have a grace period of up to a maximum of 60 days to reimburse to the
airport the TUA paid by passengers. If an airline customer needed a credit term of up to 60 days, it must provide a guarantee to the airport covering this period, bond or cash equivalent of 30 days more than the estimated consumption for the credit
period requested by that airline. In the case of insolvency of any airline or a notice by the authorities on suspension of operations, the Company may recover the pending amounts regarding TUA up to the value of the guarantee. In order to mitigate
credit risk with its customers, mainly TUA, airlines have granted cash guaranties, which are reported as Deposits received, in the consolidated statements of financial position, in addition to the cash guaranties of other commercial customers. At
December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has customer deposits of Ps. 522,204 and Ps. 430,625, respectively. These deposits are considered long-term based on the duration of the contracts signed with these airlines and the expectation that they
will maintain long-term operations at the Companys airports.

When reviewing credit risk, management groups the Companys
clients according to their credit characteristics that include whether the customer is an individual or a corporation, if they are airline customers, commercial customers, age and the existence of previous financial difficulties.

The Company systematically and periodically reviews the aging and collection of trade accounts receivable, and recognizes an allowance for
doubtful accounts when it has evidence that it is probable these accounts will not be recovered (Note 7).



F-22



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Financial investments held for trading purposes  The Company limits its exposure to credit risk by investing in government-backed securities. Management constantly monitors credit ratings does not expect any
counterparty defaults.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Liquid funds and derivative financial instruments  The credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit ratings assigned by
recognized rating agencies.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liquidity RiskThe risk of liquidity represents the possibility that
the Company will have difficulty to fulfill its obligations related with its financial liabilities that will be paid in cash or another financial asset. The Company focuses its liquidity management to ensure, as much as possible, that it will have
sufficient liquidity to comply with its obligations at their maturity date, both in normal and in extraordinary conditions, without incurring in unacceptable losses or risking the reputation of the Company.

The Company utilizes its budget, prepared at a cost center level, to allocate resources to render its services, which helps to monitor cash
flow requirements and to optimize the performance of its investments. Generally, the Company ensures availability of sufficient cash flows to cover operating expenses for a period of 60 days, including payment of its financial debt; this excludes
the possible impact of extreme circumstances that are not reasonably predictable, such as natural disasters. The Company has external financing as described in Note 16 for compliance of its obligations under the MDP, whereas for other obligations it
uses cash flows from operating activities and resources received at the maturity of its financial investments. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has available credit lines of Ps. 153,996 and Ps. 293,692, respectively.

Following is a table with a summary of the Companys contractual maturities for its financial liabilities, including the interest to be
paid, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:



|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |         |                                    |  |     |                         |  |  |                        |         |  |                  |     |           |       |  |     |         |  |  |     |           | 
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------- | ---- | - | ---------------- | --- | ------- | ---------------------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------- |  |  | ---------------------- | ------- |  | ---------------- | --- | --------- | ----- |  | --- | ------- |  |  | --- | --------- | 
|                         |  | Weighted average
of effective
interest rate |      |   | Less than 1month |     |         | December 31, 2013From 1 to 3months |  |     | From 3 months
to 1 year |  |  | From 1 year
to 5 years |         |  | More than 5years |     |           | Total | 
|Fixed rate bank loans    |  |                                             |      |   |                  | Ps. | 21,929  |                                    |  | Ps. | 21,429                  |  |  | Ps.                    | 108,642 |  |                  | Ps. | 60,500    |       |  | Ps. |        |  |  | Ps. | 212,500   | 
|Fixed rate interest      |  |                                             | 8.52 | % |                  |     | 3,227   |                                    |  |     | 1,369                   |  |  |                        | 8,132   |  |                  |     | 3,392     |       |  |     |        |  |  |     | 16,120    | 
|Variable rate bank loans |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     | 30,307  |                                    |  |     | 267,873                 |  |  |                        | 187,397 |  |                  |     | 977,470   |       |  |     | 178,929 |  |  |     | 1,641,976 | 
|Variable rate interest   |  |                                             | 5.55 | % |                  |     | 9,530   |                                    |  |     | 14,016                  |  |  |                        | 52,201  |  |                  |     | 149,415   |       |  |     | 7,532   |  |  |     | 232,694   | 
|Trade accounts payable   |  |                                             | N/A  |   |                  |     | 72,443  |                                    |  |     | 162,413                 |  |  |                        | 10,992  |  |                  |     |          |       |  |     |        |  |  |     | 245,848   | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |         |                                    |  |     |                         |  |  |                        |         |  |                  |     |           |       |  |     |         |  |  |     |           | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  | Ps. | 137,436 |                                    |  | Ps. | 467,100                 |  |  | Ps.                    | 367,364 |  |                  | Ps. | 1,190,777 |       |  | Ps. | 186,461 |  |  | Ps. | 2,349,138 | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |         |                                    |  |     |                         |  |  |                        |         |  |                  |     |           |       |  |     |         |  |  |     |           | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |        
|                         |  | Weighted averageof effectiveinterest rate   |      |   | Less than 1month |     |         | December 31, 2012From 1 to 3months |  |     | From 3 months
to 1 year |  |  | From 1 year
to 5 years |         |  | More than 5years |     |           | Total | 
|Fixed rate bank loans    |  |                                             |      |   |                  | Ps. | 21,929  |                                    |  | Ps. | 21,429                  |  |  | Ps.                    | 130,071 |  |                  | Ps. | 212,500   |       |  | Ps. |        |  |  | Ps. | 385,929   | 
|Fixed rate interest      |  |                                             | 8.52 | % |                  |     | 5,137   |                                    |  |     | 3,195                   |  |  |                        | 19,378  |  |                  |     | 16,120    |       |  |     |        |  |  |     | 43,830    | 
|Variable rate bank loans |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     | 128,399 |                                    |  |     | 49,210                  |  |  |                        | 204,887 |  |                  |     | 1,017,800 |       |  |     | 226,498 |  |  |     | 1,626,794 | 
|Variable rate interest   |  |                                             | 6.83 | % |                  |     | 9,617   |                                    |  |     | 18,400                  |  |  |                        | 71,894  |  |                  |     | 200,354   |       |  |     | 12,572  |  |  |     | 312,837   | 
|Trade accounts payable   |  |                                             | N/A  |   |                  |     | 141,491 |                                    |  |     | 139,168                 |  |  |                        | 29,344  |  |                  |     |          |       |  |     |        |  |  |     | 310,003   | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |         |                                    |  |     |                         |  |  |                        |         |  |                  |     |           |       |  |     |         |  |  |     |           | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  | Ps. | 306,573 |                                    |  | Ps. | 231,402                 |  |  | Ps.                    | 455,574 |  |                  | Ps. | 1,446,774 |       |  | Ps. | 239,070 |  |  | Ps. | 2,679,393 | 
|                         |  |                                             |      |   |                  |     |         |                                    |  |     |                         |  |  |                        |         |  |                  |     |           |       |  |     |         |  |  |     |           | 

The interest payable from loans with variable interest rates was determined based on projected interest rates,
plus the basis point adjustment corresponding to each bank loan.



F-23



---

##### Table of Contents

Market risk Is the risk that changes in market prices, such as exchange
rates, interest rates and prices of equity instruments, may affect the amount of the Companys financial instruments. The Companys market risk management objectives include controlling the risk exposures between acceptable parameters,
while optimizing profits.

The Company in certain enters into derivatives instrument contracts to manage market risks. These transactions
are in-line within the policies established by management. The Company also applies hedge accounting to minimize the volatility in profit or loss associated with certain financial instruments.



| |  |  | Foreign exchange risk  The Company is exposed to currency risk for its revenues and trade accounts receivable denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the Company, which is the peso. The
foreign currencies in which transactions are primarily denominated is the U.S. dollar (USD) (Note 28).
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The tariffs to be
charged to international passengers and international flights are published in the Official Journal (Diario Oficial de la Federación) in USD, however, in accordance with Mexican law these tariffs are billed and collected in Mexican pesos. A
significant depreciation of the peso during the last two months in each year could lead to an increase in aeronautical revenues that could lead to exceed the maximum tariff per traffic unit allowed, which may be a breach of compliance with the
Concessions maximum rates of each airport. If a significant appreciation of the peso occurs, the Company may be required to provide discounts to avoid exceeding the maximum tariffs. On the other hand, a significant appreciation of the peso
could lead to our rates substantially decreasing. The Company has no way to recover the lost revenue if it charges less than the maximum rate as a result of a significant appreciation of the peso.

While the Company can ensure that it does not exceed the maximum rates as mentioned above, the depreciation of the Mexican peso can have a
positive effect on commercial revenues and aeronautical revenues, while that appreciation of Mexican peso generally has a negative effect. The rates applied to international passengers, international flights and some of our commercial contracts are
denominated in USD and are billed and collected in Mexican pesos translated at the average exchange rate of the previous month. Therefore, the depreciation of the peso against the dollar results in the Company obtaining more USD than before the
depreciation, while the appreciation of the peso against the USD results in the Company obtaining less Mexican pesos. As the Mexican peso appreciates against the USD, the Company obtains fewer pesos which could result in a decreased in profit,
especially if the appreciation continues or exceeds historical levels. In addition, although most of our operating costs are denominated in pesos, we cannot predict whether our cost of services will increase as a consequence of the depreciation of
the peso, or as a result of other factors.



F-24



---

##### Table of Contents

Following is a sensitivity analysis of our financial assets and liabilities denominated in USD,
if the peso depreciates or appreciates by 10%, which is the amount management considers reasonably possible of occurring at year end:



|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------ | --- | ------- | ---------------------------------------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------- |  |  | --- | ------- | 
|                                                |  | USD amountsat December 31,2013 |        |  | Peso amountsat exchangerate of
Ps. 13.0765 |     |         | Peso amountsif exchangerate woulddepreciate10% |  |     | Peso amountsif exchangerate wouldappreciate10% | 
|Thousands of U.S. dollars:                      |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Financial assets:                               |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Cash and cash equivalents                       |  |                                | 181    |  |                                            | Ps. | 2,366   |                                                |  | Ps. | 2,603                                          |  |  | Ps. | 2,130   | 
|Financial investments held for trading purposes |  |                                | 31,387 |  |                                            |     | 410,433 |                                                |  |     | 451,478                                        |  |  |     | 369,391 | 
|Trade accounts receivable                       |  |                                | 1,134  |  |                                            |     | 14,826  |                                                |  |     | 16,310                                         |  |  |     | 13,344  | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|                                                |  |                                | 32,702 |  |                                            |     | 427,625 |                                                |  |     | 470,391                                        |  |  |     | 384,865 | 
|Financial liabilities:                          |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Accounts payable                                |  |                                | 237    |  |                                            |     | 3,097   |                                                |  |     | 3,402                                          |  |  |     | 2,784   | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Net asset position                              |  |                                | 32,465 |  |                                            | Ps. | 424,528 |                                                |  | Ps. | 466,989                                        |  |  | Ps. | 382,081 | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|                                                |  |                                |        | 
|                                                |  | USD amountsat December 31,2012 |        |  | Peso amountsat exchangerate ofPs.13.0101   |     |         | Peso amountsif exchangerate woulddepreciate10% |  |     | Peso amountsif exchangerate wouldappreciate10% | 
|Thousands of U.S. dollars:                      |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Financial assets:                               |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Cash and cash equivalents                       |  |                                | 240    |  |                                            | Ps. | 3,120   |                                                |  | Ps. | 3,435                                          |  |  | Ps. | 2,810   | 
|Financial investments held for trading purposes |  |                                | 33,326 |  |                                            |     | 433,573 |                                                |  |     | 476,932                                        |  |  |     | 390,217 | 
|Trade accounts receivable                       |  |                                | 3,536  |  |                                            |     | 46,004  |                                                |  |     | 50,604                                         |  |  |     | 41,403  | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|                                                |  |                                | 37,102 |  |                                            |     | 482,697 |                                                |  |     | 530,971                                        |  |  |     | 434,430 | 
|Financial liabilities:                          |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Accounts payable                                |  |                                | 224    |  |                                            |     | 2,914   |                                                |  |     | 3,206                                          |  |  |     | 2,623   | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 
|Net asset position                              |  |                                | 36,878 |  |                                            | Ps. | 479,783 |                                                |  | Ps. | 527,765                                        |  |  | Ps. | 431,807 | 
|                                                |  |                                |        |  |                                            |     |         |                                                |  |     |                                                |  |  |     |         | 



| |  |  | Interest rate risk  The Company monitors its interest rate risk and when bank loans are entered into with variable interest rates it determines whether it should enter into derivative financial instruments, in
order to reduce its exposure to the risk of volatility in interest rates (Note 13). The negotiation with derivative financial instruments is only entered into with institutions of high repute and credit rating. The Company does not enter into
operations for speculative purposes.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following sensitivity analysis has been determined based on the exposure to
interest rates for both derivatives and non-derivative financial instruments at the end of the reporting period. For loans with variable interest rates, an analysis is prepared assuming the amount of liability outstanding at the end of the reporting
period under review has been the current liability for the year. The sensitivity analysis used assumes an increase or decrease of 100 basis points, which is the change management considers reasonably possible of occurring at year end.



F-25



---

##### Table of Contents

If interest rates had been 100 basis points higher or lower than the interest rate at year-end
with the other variables remaining constant, the effect on net income and stockholders equity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 would be as follows:



|                                                             |  |      |          |  |      |     |          | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | -------- |  | ---- | --- | -------- | 
|                                                             |  | 2013 |          |  | 2012 |    
|Effect in case of interest rate increase in 100 basis points |  |      |          |  |      |     |          | 
|Variable rate bank loans                                     |  | Ps.  | (10,491) |  |      | Ps. | (14,313) | 
|                                                             |  |      |          |  |      |     |          | 
|Effect in case of interest rate decrease in 100 basis points |  |      |          |  |      |     |          | 
|Variable rate bank loans                                     |  | Ps.  | 10,491   |  |      | Ps. | 14,313   | 
|                                                             |  |      |          |  |      |     |          | 

Based on the forward interest rate curves for the contractual term of the Companys loans where
management has entered into derivative interest rate caps to hedge the volatility in interest rate risk, the Company does not expect that such forward rates will be above 7.0%, which is the strike price of the interest rate cap for some of the
Companys bank loans. However, if the interest rates increase above 7.0%, the hedging instrument would become effective and the intrinsic value of the instrument would be recognized in other comprehensive income.

The Company has entered into derivative financial instrument interest rate caps (CAPs), whereby it agreed to exchange the difference between
the amounts of the variable interest rate calculated over the principal amounts of the hedged items associated with its variable rate debt instruments. These contracts allow the Company to hedge the cash flow exposures on debt contracted at variable
interest rates. The fair value of the CAPs at the end of the reporting period is measured at their fair market value, which amounted to Ps. 340 and Ps. 1,045, respectively at December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Note 13).

Capital Management The policy of the Board of Directors of the Company is to maintain a strong capital position to provide
confidence to its investors, creditors, and the market and to sustain future development of the business. The Board of Directors monitors the return on equity, which the Company defines as result from net profit divided by total stockholders
equity.

The Board of Directors seeks to maintain the optimal balance for the ratio between total liabilities and stockholders
equity, which may result from increased levels of bank loans up to the financial structure that it deems optimal, therefore, management seeks authorization from the Board of Directors for any additional debt issuances or for the prepayment of debt.
While the liability grows in relation to equity and net profit continues to increase, the Company will generate higher returns on capital.

Following is the ratio of stockholders equity to total liabilities of the Company at the end of the reporting period:



|                                                   |  |      |            |  |      |     |            | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- |  | ---- | --- | ---------- | 
|                                                   |  | 2013 |            |  | 2012 |    
|Stockholders equity                               |  | Ps.  | 22,212,711 |  |      | Ps. | 21,453,213 | 
|Total liabilities                                  |  |      | 3,021,889  |  |      |     | 3,080,424  | 
|Ratio of total stockholders equity to liabilities |  |      | 7.4        |  |      |     | 7.0        | 

The Company may elect to repurchase its own shares in the stock market, under the following terms and
conditions:



| |  |  | The acquisition has to be approved previously at a Stockholders Meeting and be at market price (except in the case of public offerings or auctions authorized by the stock market).
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | If the acquisition is made, the Company reduces stockholders equity and reflects the acquisition within the repurchased shares account. If the Company decides to cancel the shares it reduces common stock
accordingly.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-26



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Announcing the amount of common stock issued and paid when determining the authorized stock, for repurchase. The Ordinary Stockholders Meeting shall expressly agree, for each year, the maximum amount of funds that may
be used for the repurchase of the Companys shares, with the only limitation that the sum of the resources that can be used for this purpose, in no event shall exceed the total balance of retained earnings of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Repurchased shares are not subject to vote at the Companys Stockholders Meeting, do not provide rights or economic benefits and are also
not considered when determining a quorum to vote.

During the year, there was no change in the Companys capital management policy.
The Company is not subject to externally equity requirements, except for those corresponding to the minimum common stock required by Mexican Companies Law (Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles).

Fair value of the financial instruments Except for bank loans, management believes the carrying amounts of financial
assets and financial liabilities, recognized at amortized cost in the financial statements, approximate their fair value due to their short-term maturities.

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of bank loans recognized at amortized cost was Ps. 1,817,414 and Ps. 1,918,827,
respectively, while their book value is Ps. 1,854,476 and Ps. 2,012,723, respectively. The fair value of bank loans are determined in accordance with generally accepted pricing models based on discounted cash flow analysis.

The fair value of financial assets and liabilities is determined as follows:



| |  |  | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1);
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (ie as prices) or indirectly (ie derived from prices) (Level 2); and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs) (Level 3)
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial instruments recognized at fair value, are categorized according to the fair value hierarchy into levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to
which their fair value is objectively observable, are:



| |  |  | Financial instruments classified as FVTPL  Are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Derivative financial instruments  Are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Cash and cash equivalents
|-- | -------------------------

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balances are
comprised of the following:



|                                                           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --------- |  | ----------------- | --- | --------- | 
|                                                           |  | December 31,
2013 |           |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Cash                                                       |  | Ps.               | 119,136   |  |                   | Ps. | 115,118   | 
|Cash equivalents designated for expenditure, held in trust |  |                   | 8,172     |  |                   |     | 24,947    | 
|Overnight investments of cash surpluses                    |  |                   | 2,040,879 |  |                   |     | 1,523,618 | 
|                                                           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|                                                           |  | Ps.               | 2,168,187 |  |                   | Ps. | 1,663,683 | 
|                                                           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 

On December 23, 2009 the Company established a trust for investment and administration with Banamex, who
acts as a trustee, while the airports of the Company are trustors and beneficiaries in the second instance, and Rapiscan is the beneficiary in first instance. The trust is controlled by a Technical Committee consisting solely of executives of the
Company, although Rapiscan will be able to intervene in the event that the resources held in trust will be used for projects other than that stipulated in the trust agreement. On February 25, 2010, the Company signed a modification agreement
which converts the trust to an irrevocable trust whose funds are solely to be used for payment to Rapiscan in return for its construction services provided with respect to a documented baggage inspection project. If either party does not fulfill
their obligations with respect to the trust agreement, the assets held in trust will be frozen until either a judicial resolution or an arbitration proceeding determines the rights of each party. The assets are only to be invested in government
securities denominated in national currency or bonds guaranteed by the Mexican Government, as instructed by the Company, and should be immediately



F-27



---

##### Table of Contents

available. The duration of the trust is for the period in which the contracts with the airports are in force and over which Rapiscan will fulfill the terms of the contract. As of December, 31,
2013 and 2012, the balances are for Ps. 8,172 and Ps. 24,077 respectively, including funds and earned interest.

On December 15, 2011,
the Company established one trust for investment and administration with Banamex, who act as a trustee, while Tijuana airport is trustor and trustee. The trust is controlled by a Technical Committee consisting solely of executives of the Company,
this trust was revocable and only was destined to pay the execution of the construction Enlargement Terminal Building Phase III in the Tijuana airport. The trust concluded at February 15, 2013, because all funds were used for the
purpose of the trust. As of December, 31, 2012, the balance in the Tijuana airport was Ps. 870, including funds and earned interest.



|6. | Financial investments held for trading purposes
|-- | -----------------------------------------------

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the
Companys financial instruments are comprised as follows:



|                 |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         |                 |  |     |            |  |  |     |         | 
|---------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ------- | --------------- |  | --- | ---------- |  |  | --- | ------- | 
|                 |  | December 31, 2013 |         |  | December 31, 2012 |    
|                 |  | AcquisitionCost   |         |  | Fair
Value        |     |         | AcquisitionCost |  |     | Fair
Value | 
|Pemex 2018 Bonds |  | Ps.               | 18,676  |  |                   | Ps. | 17,112  |                 |  | Ps. | 18,582     |  |  | Ps. | 18,221  | 
|Pemex 2018 Bonds |  |                   | 156,153 |  |                   |     | 149,508 |                 |  |     | 155,360    |  |  |     | 154,369 | 
|Pemex 2019 Bonds |  |                   | 253,084 |  |                   |     | 243,813 |                 |  |     | 251,799    |  |  |     | 260,983 | 
|                 |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         |                 |  |     |            |  |  |     |         | 
|Total            |  | Ps.               | 427,913 |  |                   | Ps. | 410,433 |                 |  | Ps. | 425,741    |  |  | Ps. | 433,573 | 
|                 |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         |                 |  |     |            |  |  |     |         | 



|                 |  |                      |       |                   |               |                    |                      |  |       |               |  |                   
|---------------- |  | -------------------- | ----- | ----------------- | ------------- | ------------------ | -------------------- |  | ----- | ------------- |  | ------------------
|                 |  |                     
|                 |  | December 31, 2013    |       | December 31, 2012
|                 |  | Averageinterest rate |       |                   | Maturity
date |                    | Averageinterest rate |  |       | Maturity
date
|Pemex 2018 Bonds |  |                      | 3.286 | %                 |               | March 1, 2018      |                      |  | 3.731 | %             |  | March 1, 2018     
|Pemex 2018 Bonds |  |                      | 3.213 | %                 |               | September 30, 2018 |                      |  | 3.718 | %             |  | September 30, 2018
|Pemex 2019 Bonds |  |                      | 3.442 | %                 |               | May 3, 2019        |                      |  | 3.928 | %             |  | May 3, 2019       

Investments held for trading purposes are comprised of government bonds with immediate liquidity. According to
the treasury policy of the Company, such investments will be sold within one year of acquisition. Investments are presented at fair value based on the market value of such bonds at each statement of financial position date. Changes in fair value are
recognized within in the finance cost of the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.



|7. | Trade accounts receivable
|-- | -------------------------

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, trade accounts
receivable are comprised of the following:



|                                |  |              |          |   |              |     |          |  
|------------------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | - | ------------ | --- | -------- | -
|                                |  | December 31, |          |   | December 31, |    
|                                |  | 2013         |          |   | 2012         |    
|Trade accounts receivable       |  | Ps.          | 372,497  |   |              | Ps. | 470,801  |  
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  |              | (164,982 | ) |              |     | (226,005 | )
|                                |  |              |          |   |              |     |          |  
|                                |  | Ps.          | 207,515  |   |              | Ps. | 244,796  |  
|                                |  |              |          |   |              |     |          |  

Accounts receivable include balances to be reimbursed to the Company by domestic and international airlines
for passenger charges fees (TUA) of Ps. 202,464 and Ps. 250,293 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Passenger charges are payable for each passenger (other than diplomats, infants, transfer and transit passengers) departing from the
airport terminals operated by the Company and are collected by the airlines and subsequently remitted to the Company.



F-28



---

##### Table of Contents

The movements in the allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded under cost of services in the
consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.



|                     |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |  
|-------------------- |  | ---- | -------- | - | ---- | --- | -------- | -
|                     |  | 2013 |          |   | 2012 |    
|Beginning balance    |  | Ps.  | (226,005 | ) |      | Ps. | (228,352 | )
|Bad debt expense     |  |      | (11,758  | ) |      |     | (16,869  | )
|Write-offs           |  |      | 61,499   |   |      |     | 17,379   |  
|Reversal of bad debt |  |      | 11,282   |   |      |     | 1,837    |  
|                     |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |  
|Ending balance       |  | Ps.  | (164,982 | ) |      | Ps. | (226,005 | )
|                     |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |  

The allowance for doubtful accounts is comprised of customer balances that are in litigation or bankruptcy
process and legal proceedings, which at the date of the consolidated financial statements are not yet completed. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, these balances amounted to Ps. 98,026 and Ps. 157,113, respectively. The allowance also includes
customer balances in arrears in their payments and that are in a process of regularization; therefore they have not been sued. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amount of these balances amounted to Ps. 66,956 and Ps. 68,892, respectively.
During 2013 and 2012, the Company recorded write-offs of the balances that were in a legal process with an unfavorable outcome for the Company, the amount of these write-offs totaled Ps. 61,499 and Ps. 17,379, respectively. These write-offs had no
effect on the operating results of the Company during 2013 and 2012. There are other cancellations of bad debt for customers that were in arrears in their payments, but were paid in 2013 and 2012 for Ps. 11,282 and Ps. 1,837, respectively.

Following are past due balances of accounts receivable, for which there has not been a provision of allowance for doubtful accounts, according
to the Companys policy and their maturity date:



|                                                |  |              |        |  |              |     |        | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ |  | ------------ | --- | ------ | 
|                                                |  | December 31, |        |  | December 31, |    
|                                                |  | 2013         |        |  | 2012         |    
|Accounts receivables past due from 1 to 30 days |  | Ps.          | 20,600 |  |              | Ps. | 18,643 | 
|Accounts receivables past due 31 to 60 days     |  |              | 4,475  |  |              |     | 5,012  | 
|Accounts receivables past due 61 to 90 days     |  |              | 1,009  |  |              |     | 1,327  | 
|Accounts receivables past due more than 90 days |  |              | 121    |  |              |     | 206    | 
|                                                |  |              |        |  |              |     |        | 
|                                                |  | Ps.          | 26,205 |  |              | Ps. | 25,188 | 
|                                                |  |              |        |  |              |     |        | 

Following the percentage shown represents the balance of the main clients of the Company with relation to the
total of the trade accounts receivable, segregating the accounts receivable of airport services ( SAE) and the passengers charges (TUA), that corresponds to the amounts that the airline recovers from the passengers in behalf of the Company and
subsequently they deliver:



|                                                           |  |                         |     |   |                     |  |     |                         |  |  |                     |   |  |  |     |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --- | - | ------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------- |  |  | ------------------- | - |  |  | --- | -
|                                                           |  | December 31,
2013       |     |   | December 31,
2012   | 
|                                                           |  | % of TUA tobereimbursed |     |   | % ofreceivables
SAE |  |     | % of TUA tobereimbursed |  |  | % ofreceivables
SAE |  
|Concesionaria Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.P.I. de C.V. |  |                         | 9.6 | % |                     |  | 7.5 | %                       |  |  | 10.0                | % |  |  | 2.4 | %
|ABC Aerolíneas, S.A. de C.V.                               |  |                         | 5.8 | % |                     |  | 4.8 | %                       |  |  | 7.3                 | % |  |  | 1.0 | %
|Aerovías de México, S.A. de C.V.                           |  |                         | 4.0 | % |                     |  | 2.3 | %                       |  |  | 6.1                 | % |  |  | 0.9 | %
|Aerolitoral, S.A. de C.V.                                  |  |                         | 5.7 | % |                     |  | 1.0 | %                       |  |  | 7.2                 | % |  |  | 0.7 | %

The Company has cash, bonds and goods that guarantee certain amounts from TUA as well as accounts receivables
from clients as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. These guaranties would be able to apply to any unpaid balance in case of a breach from clients and under certain circumstances.



F-29



---

##### Table of Contents

|8. | Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------

As of December 31, 2013
and 2012, the machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings are comprised as follows:



|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | - | --------- | --- | -------- | ------------ |  | --- | ------------------------------ | - |  | --- | --------- | -
|                                 |  | Balance as ofJanuary 1,2013 |           |   | Additions |     |          | Divestitures |  |     | Balance as ofDecember 31,2013  |  
|Investment:                      |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Machinery and equipment          |  | Ps.                         | 1,101,715 |   |           | Ps. | 42,834   |              |  | Ps. | (11,264                        | ) |  | Ps. | 1,133,285 |  
|Office furniture and equipment   |  |                             | 138,354   |   |           |     | 9,511    |              |  |     | (3,213                         | ) |  |     | 144,652   |  
|Computer equipment               |  |                             | 280,670   |   |           |     | 37,866   |              |  |     | (7,471                         | ) |  |     | 311,065   |  
|Transportation equipment         |  |                             | 31,529    |   |           |     | 370      |              |  |     | (4,650                         | ) |  |     | 27,249    |  
|Communication equipment          |  |                             | 15,597    |   |           |     | 2,369    |              |  |     | (264                           | ) |  |     | 17,702    |  
|Improvements on leased buildings |  |                             | 10,207    |   |           |     | 206      |              |  |     |                               |   |  |     | 10,413    |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Total investment                 |  | Ps.                         | 1,578,072 |   |           | Ps. | 93,156   |              |  | Ps. | (26,862)                       |   |  | Ps. | 1,644,366 |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Accumulated depreciation:        |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Machinery and equipment          |  | Ps.                         | (354,840  | ) |           | Ps. | (96,155  | )            |  | Ps. | 7,277                          |   |  | Ps. | (443,718  | )
|Office furniture and equipment   |  |                             | (70,579   | ) |           |     | (11,591  | )            |  |     | 2,764                          |   |  |     | (79,406   | )
|Computer equipment               |  |                             | (165,508  | ) |           |     | (51,578  | )            |  |     | 5,518                          |   |  |     | (211,568  | )
|Transportation equipment         |  |                             | (26,462   | ) |           |     | (2,649   | )            |  |     | 4,650                          |   |  |     | (24,461   | )
|Communication equipment          |  |                             | (7,465    | ) |           |     | (1,630   | )            |  |     | 179                            |   |  |     | (8,916    | )
|Improvements on leased buildings |  |                             | (1,753    | ) |           |     | (1,003   | )            |  |     |                               |   |  |     | (2,756    | )
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Total accumulated depreciation   |  | Ps.                         | (626,607  | ) |           | Ps. | (164,606 | )            |  | Ps. | 20,388                         |   |  | Ps. | (770,825  | )
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Net amounts                      |  | Ps.                         | 951,465   |   |           | Ps. | (71,450  | )            |  | Ps. | (6,474                         | ) |  | Ps. | 873,541   |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |  
|                                 |  | Balance as ofJanuary 1,2012 |           |   | Additions |     |          | Divestitures |  |     | Balance as ofDecember 31,
2012 |  
|Investment:                      |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Machinery and equipment          |  | Ps.                         | 934,379   |   |           | Ps. | 189,071  |              |  | Ps. | (21,735                        | ) |  | Ps. | 1,101,715 |  
|Office furniture and equipment   |  |                             | 124,793   |   |           |     | 20,800   |              |  |     | (7,239                         | ) |  |     | 138,354   |  
|Computer equipment               |  |                             | 231,458   |   |           |     | 55,889   |              |  |     | (6,677                         | ) |  |     | 280,670   |  
|Transportation equipment         |  |                             | 30,840    |   |           |     | 1,726    |              |  |     | (1,037                         | ) |  |     | 31,529    |  
|Communication equipment          |  |                             | 15,000    |   |           |     | 1,227    |              |  |     | (630                           | ) |  |     | 15,597    |  
|Improvements on leased buildings |  |                             | 8,824     |   |           |     | 4,928    |              |  |     | (3,545                         | ) |  |     | 10,207    |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Total investment                 |  | Ps.                         | 1,345,294 |   |           | Ps. | 273,641  |              |  | Ps. | (40,863                        | ) |  | Ps. | 1,578,072 |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Accumulated depreciation:        |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Machinery and equipment          |  | Ps.                         | (284,271  | ) |           | Ps. | (86,874  | )            |  | Ps. | 16,305                         |   |  | Ps. | (354,840  | )
|Office furniture and equipment   |  |                             | (65,510   | ) |           |     | (12,121  | )            |  |     | 7,052                          |   |  |     | (70,579   | )
|Computer equipment               |  |                             | (125,329  | ) |           |     | (46,746  | )            |  |     | 6,567                          |   |  |     | (165,508  | )
|Transportation equipment         |  |                             | (24,975   | ) |           |     | (2,524   | )            |  |     | 1,037                          |   |  |     | (26,462   | )
|Communication equipment          |  |                             | (6,401    | ) |           |     | (1,537   | )            |  |     | 473                            |   |  |     | (7,465    | )
|Improvements on leased buildings |  |                             | (2,469    | ) |           |     | (1,374   | )            |  |     | 2,090                          |   |  |     | (1,753    | )
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Total accumulated depreciation   |  | Ps.                         | (508,955  | ) |           | Ps. | (151,176 | )            |  | Ps. | 33,524                         |   |  | Ps. | (626,607  | )
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  
|Net amounts                      |  | Ps.                         | 836,339   |   |           | Ps. | 122,465  |              |  | Ps. | (7,339                         | ) |  | Ps. | 951,465   |  
|                                 |  |                             |           |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |                                |   |  |     |           |  



F-30



---

##### Table of Contents

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the net amounts of machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings
are:



|                                 |  |                                |         |  |                                |     |         | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------- |  | ------------------------------ | --- | ------- | 
|                                 |  | Balance as ofDecember 31, 2013 |         |  | Balance as ofDecember 31, 2012 |    
|Net amounts:                     |  |                                |         |  |                                |     |         | 
|Machinery and equipment          |  | Ps.                            | 689,567 |  |                                | Ps. | 746,875 | 
|Office furniture and equipment   |  |                                | 65,246  |  |                                |     | 67,775  | 
|Computer equipment               |  |                                | 99,497  |  |                                |     | 115,162 | 
|Transportation equipment         |  |                                | 2,788   |  |                                |     | 5,067   | 
|Communication equipment          |  |                                | 8,786   |  |                                |     | 8,132   | 
|Improvements on leased buildings |  |                                | 7,657   |  |                                |     | 8,454   | 
|                                 |  |                                |         |  |                                |     |         | 
|Total amounts                    |  | Ps.                            | 873,541 |  |                                | Ps. | 951,465 | 
|                                 |  |                                |         |  |                                |     |         | 

The Company has several buildings under operating leasing for office use. In Notes 25.a and 30, the Company
disclosed the costs and obligations under these leases.



|9. | Improvements to concession assets
|-- | ---------------------------------

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the
improvements to concession assets are comprised as follows:



|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|--------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ---------- | - | --------- | --- | -------- | ------------ |  | --- | --------- | - |  | ------------------------------ | ---------- | - |  | --- | ---------- | -
|                                  |  | Balance as ofJanuary 1,
2013 |            |   | Additions |     |          | Divestitures |  |     | Transfers |   |  | Balance as ofDecember 31,
2013 |           
|Investment:                       |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |  
|Improvements to concession assets |  | Ps.                          | 6,005,670  |   |           | Ps. | 97,155   |              |  | Ps. | (13,591   | ) |  | Ps.                            | 257,085    |   |  | Ps. | 6,346,319  |  
|Construction in-progress          |  |                              | 168,316    |   |           |     | 456,877  |              |  |     | (510      | ) |  |                                | (257,085   | ) |  |     | 367,598    |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Total investment                  |  | Ps.                          | 6,173,986  |   |           | Ps. | 554,032  |              |  | Ps. | (14,101   | ) |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | 6,713,917  |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Accumulated amortization          |  | Ps.                          | (1,363,836 | ) |           | Ps. | (351,332 | )            |  | Ps. | 3,918     |   |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | (1,711,250 | )
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Net amounts                       |  | Ps.                          | 4,810,150  |   |           | Ps. | 202,700  |              |  | Ps. | (10,183   | ) |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | 5,002,667  |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |          
|                                  |  | Balance as ofJanuary 1,
2012 |            |   | Additions |     |          | Divestitures |  |     | Transfers |   |  | Balance as ofDecember 31,
2012 |           
|Investment:                       |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |  
|Improvements to concession assets |  | Ps.                          | 4,740,837  |   |           | Ps. | 130,312  |              |  | Ps. | (21,249)  |   |  | Ps.                            | 1,155,770  |   |  | Ps. | 6,005,670  |  
|Construction in-progress          |  |                              | 774,803    |   |           |     | 549,283  |              |  |     |          |   |  |                                | (1,155,770 | ) |  |     | 168,316    |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Total investment                  |  | Ps.                          | 5,515,640  |   |           | Ps. | 679,595  |              |  | Ps. | (21,249   | ) |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | 6,173,986  |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Accumulated amortization          |  | Ps.                          | (1,077,988 | ) |           | Ps. | (307,096 | )            |  | Ps. | 21,249    |   |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | (1,363,836 | )
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  
|Net amounts                       |  | Ps.                          | 3,662,849  |   |           | Ps. | 372,499  |              |  | Ps. |          |   |  | Ps.                            |           |   |  | Ps. | 4,810,150  |  
|                                  |  |                              |            |   |           |     |          |              |  |     |           |   |  |                                |            |   |  |     |            |  

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the net amounts of improvements to concession assets are:



|                                  |  |                                 |           |  |                                 |     |           | 
|--------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------- |  | ------------------------------- | --- | --------- | 
|                                  |  | Balance as of
December 31, 2013 |           |  | Balance as of
December 31, 2012 |    
|Net amounts:                      |  |                                 |           |  |                                 |     |           | 
|Improvements to concession assets |  | Ps.                             | 4,627,383 |  |                                 | Ps. | 4,641,834 | 
|Construction in-progress          |  |                                 | 375,284   |  |                                 |     | 168,316   | 
|                                  |  |                                 |           |  |                                 |     |           | 
|Total amounts                     |  | Ps.                             | 5,002,667 |  |                                 | Ps. | 4,810,150 | 
|                                  |  |                                 |           |  |                                 |     |           | 

Improvements to concession assets are comprised by intangible assets from additions and improvements to such
assets in accordance with IFRIC 12, as well as other investments that have been carried out to the infrastructure of the airports.



F-31



---

##### Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance of machinery, equipment, improvements on
leased buildings and improvements to concession assets includes investments pending to be paid of Ps. 135,386 and Ps. 163,644, respectively. Construction in-progress relates mainly to the expansion of the terminal building at the Guadalajara, La
Paz, Mexicali and San Jose del Cabo airports, and to the cross border bridge in Tijuana airport. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the cumulative net amount capitalized was Ps. 166,610 and Ps. 161,907, respectively, with a capitalization rate
of 1.3% and 6.9%, respectively. During 2013 and 2012, there was capitalized bank interest for Ps. 4,713 and Ps. 37,570, respectively.



|10. | Airport concessions
|--- | -------------------

As described in Note 1.a, the Mexican Government granted
concessions to manage, operate and develop 12 airports, and benefit from the use of the airport facilities over a 50-year term beginning November 1, 1998. The value of airport concessions and rights to use airport facilities was determined as
explained in Note 1.a, and paid by GAP through the issuance of shares to the Mexican Government.

The table below shows the values of
airport concessions and rights to use airport facilities as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:



|                                            |  |     |            | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | --- | ---------- | 
|Acquisition cost assigned to:               |  | Ps. | 15,938,359 | 
|                                            |  |     |            | 
|Rights to use airport facilities (Note 11): |  |     |            | 
|Runways, aprons, platforms                  |  | Ps. | 519,057    | 
|Buildings                                   |  |     | 577,270    | 
|Other facilities                            |  |     | 91,241     | 
|Land                                        |  |     | 930,140    | 
|                                            |  |     |            | 
|                                            |  |     | 2,117,708  | 
|Airport concessions                         |  |     | 13,820,651 | 
|                                            |  |     |            | 
|                                            |  | Ps. | 15,938,359 | 
|                                            |  |     |            | 

The original amortization term for the concessions is 49 years. As mentioned in Note 1.a, the concession value
was assigned in August 1999, date in which the amortization term began, and will run through November 2048.

The value of the concessions
at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:



|                              |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---------- | - | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | -
|                              |  | December 31,
2013 |            |   | December 31,
2012 |    
|Airport concessions           |  | Ps.               | 13,820,651 |   |                   | Ps. | 13,820,651 |  
|Lessaccumulated amortization |  |                   | (3,925,305 | ) |                   |     | (3,641,229 | )
|                              |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  
|                              |  | Ps.               | 9,895,346  |   |                   | Ps. | 10,179,422 |  
|                              |  |                   |            |   |                   |     |            |  

Amortization recognized for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, amounts to Ps. 284,076 in both
years.

Each airport concession agreement contains the following terms and basic conditions:



| |  |  | The concessionaire has the right to manage, operate, maintain and use the airport facilities and carry out any construction, improvements, or maintenance of facilities in accordance with its MDP, and to provide airport,
complementary and commercial services. Each concessionaire is required to make minimum investments at each airport under the terms of its MDP. The Companys investment plans under the MDP must be updated every five years starting from 2000 and
approved by the SCT. During December 2009, the SCT authorized the Companys MDP update for the five-year period from 2010 to 2014.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The concessionaire will use the airport facilities only for the purposes specified in the concession, will provide services in conformity with the law and applicable regulations, and will be subject to inspections by
the SCT.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The concessionaire must pay a tax for the use of the assets under concession (currently 5% of the concessionaires annual gross revenues derived from the use of public property), in conformity with the Mexican
Federal Duties Law.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-32



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | The concessionaire assumed ASAs rights and obligations derived from airport-related agreements with third parties.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ASA has the exclusive right to supply fuel for consumption at the airport.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The concessionaire must grant free access to specific airport areas to certain Mexican Government agencies (such as customs and immigration) so that they may carry out their activities within the airport.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | According to Article 27 of the General Law on Airports, the concession may be revoked if the concessionaire breaches any of its obligations established therein or falls under any of the causes for revocation referred to
in Article 26 of law and in the concession agreement. The breach of certain concession terms may be cause for revocation if the SCT has applied sanctions in three different instances with respect to the same concession term.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The SCT may modify concession terms and conditions that regulate the Companys operations.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The concession may be renewed in one or more instances, for terms not to exceed an additional 50 years.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|11. | Rights to use airport facilities
|--- | --------------------------------

The value of the rights to use airport facilities at
December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:



|                                 |  |                   |           |   |                   |     |           |  
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --------- | - | ----------------- | --- | --------- | -
|                                 |  | December 31,
2013 |           |   | December 31,
2012 |    
|Rights to use airport facilities |  | Ps.               | 2,117,708 |   |                   | Ps. | 2,117,708 |  
|Lessaccumulated amortization    |  |                   | (903,916  | ) |                   |     | (847,218  | )
|                                 |  |                   |           |   |                   |     |           |  
|                                 |  | Ps.               | 1,213,792 |   |                   | Ps. | 1,270,490 |  
|                                 |  |                   |           |   |                   |     |           |  

Amortization recognized in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to Ps. 56,698 in each
year.



|12. | Other acquired rights
|--- | ---------------------

At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the other acquired rights
correspond to payments made by the Company after the date the concessions were granted, in order to early-terminate certain long-term leases contracts that existed at that time between ASA and third-party leaseholders. The rights acquired are
comprised as follows:



|                                                                                                 |  |                  |          |   |                  |     |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- | -------- | - | ---------------- | --- | -------- | -
|                                                                                                 |  | December 31,2013 |          |   | December 31,2012 |    
|Right to operate the charter and general aviation terminal and FBO at Los Cabos airport terminal |  | Ps.              | 344,443  |   |                  | Ps. | 344,443  |  
|Right to operate commercial space at Tijuana airport                                             |  |                  | 15,935   |   |                  |     | 15,935   |  
|Right to operate various space at Puerto Vallarta airport                                        |  |                  | 309,616  |   |                  |     | 309,616  |  
|Right to operate commercial space at Guadalajara airport                                         |  |                  | 93,560   |   |                  |     | 93,560   |  
|Right to operate various parking lots                                                            |  |                  | 5,673    |   |                  |     | 5,673    |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |          |   |                  |     |          |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  | 769,227  |   |                  |     | 769,227  |  
|Lessaccumulated amortization                                                                    |  |                  | (187,446 | ) |                  |     | (170,746 | )
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |          |   |                  |     |          |  
|                                                                                                 |  | Ps.              | 581,781  |   |                  | Ps. | 598,481  |  
|                                                                                                 |  |                  |          |   |                  |     |          |  

Amortization recognized in the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 amounted to Ps. 16,700 in each
year. These assets have a useful life until the end of the concession, due to its use and exploitation will continue until then.



|13. | Derivative financial instruments
|--- | --------------------------------

The Company has borrowings at variable interest rates,
which in case of an increase in interest rates, would reduce the Companys cash flows. Through the contracting of the CAPs with Banamex, the Company established a ceiling to hedge the increase in interest rates such that if the relevant rate
surpasses the level established (strike) in the contract, the CAP generates positive cash flows to the Company, which offsets the negative effects of the increase in the interest rates from the underlying bank loans. The Companys derivative
financial instruments, are negotiated in the market Over The Counter (OTC) market, through national and international banks.



F-33



---

##### Table of Contents

On December 9, 2009, the Company entered into unsecured credit agreements with crossed
guarantees by its individual airports, with Banamex and HSBC receiving funds for Ps. 325,723 from each institution, for a total of Ps. 651,446. The loans bear interest at the variable Mexican Interbank Equilibrium Interest Rate (TIIE) plus 350 basis
points, requiring quarterly payments of principal and interest for a period of seven years. Funds from the loan are intended to fulfill investment commitments.

With respect to the loans, each contracting airport entered into a derivative financial instrument with Banamex. This instrument establishes a
ceiling of 7% on the variable 91-day TIIE interest rates stipulated in the loan agreements (representing the strike price of the hedging instrument), which when added to the 350 basis points established in the loan agreements and the related hedge
contract, results in a maximum interest rate of 10.50%. The effective date of the hedge begins in the fourth year of the related debt agreement and extends to the end of the term of the debt. This hedge applies to both loans issued by Banamex and by
HSBC.

These financial instruments were not entered into for speculative purposes, but neither were formally designated and therefore did
not qualify as hedging instruments for accounting purposes and as a result changes in their fair value are recognized in profit or loss within finance cost. The main characteristics and the fair value of these derivatives at December 31, 2013
and 2012, are as follows:



|             |  |                |         |  |               |                  |                                    |              |               |              |                   |     |     |                  |  |     |       | 
|------------ |  | -------------- | ------- |  | ------------- | ---------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------- | ------------ | ----------------- | --- | --- | ---------------- |  | --- | ----- | 
|Counterparty |  | Notionalamount |         |  | Interest
rate |                  | Start date ofthe hedginginstrument |              | Maturity
date |              | December 31,
2013 |     |     | December 31,2012 | 
|Banamex      |  | Ps.            | 61,609  |  |               | TIIE 91 Strike7% |                                    | December2012 |               | December2016 |                   | Ps. |    |                  |  | Ps. | 206   | 
|Banamex      |  |                | 235,714 |  |               | TIIE 91 Strike7% |                                    | January2013  |               | January2017  |                   |     | 340 |                  |  |     | 839   | 
|             |  |                |         |  |               |                  |                                    |              |               |              |                   |     |     |                  |  |     |       | 
|             |  | Ps.            | 297,323 |  |               |                  |                                    |              |               |              |                   | Ps. | 340 |                  |  | Ps. | 1,045 | 
|             |  |                |         |  |               |                  |                                    |              |               |              |                   |     |     |                  |  |     |       | 

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized Ps. 705 and Ps. 3,424,
respectively, within finance cost as an expense of the period, due to the value of the premium paid; no amounts have been recognized through other comprehensive income at the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, for the effect of the
intrinsic value of these hedges, as the current rates are below TIIE underlying the 7% as mentioned in Note 4, and according to the projections of interest rate curves, they are not expected to exceed the underlying 7%.

With the pre-payment on December 9, 2013 corresponding to the first disbursement, the CAP hedge was canceled, leaving the corresponding
amount to the second disbursement.



|14. | Income taxes
|--- | ------------

The Company is subject to ISR and IETU until 2013.

ISR  The ISR rate was 30% for 2013, 2012 and 2011. The ISR rate of 30% will be for 2014 and subsequent years.

IETU  Since 2014 this tax was repealed, according to the Tax Reform for 2014 published in the Official Gazette on December 11, 2013.
Therefore, up to December 31, 2013, this tax was incurred both on revenues and deductions and certain tax credits based on cash flows from each year. The respective rate was 17.5%.

The current income tax is the greater of ISR and IETU up to 2013.

Through 2012, the Company identified some subsidiaries that would pay IETU, for which reason these subsidiaries recognized only deferred IETU.
However, due to the elimination of IETU in 2013, the effect of the deferred IETU was canceled by the Company through results of the year, and the respective deferred ISR was recorded.

To determine deferred ISR at December 31, 2013, the Company applied the applicable tax rates to temporary differences based on their
estimated reversal dates.



F-34



---

##### Table of Contents

| | a. | Recoverable income taxes paid on dividendsDividends paid to stockholders which are not derived from the net tax income account (CUFIN) generate ISR, which can be credited against the taxes
of the Company during the year of the dividend payment and the two subsequent years.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | Recoverable taxesIn the regular course of its operations the Company generates tax receivable balances for monthly tax payments in excess of the year-end tax liability, according to the
calculation mechanism established in the Tax Law, as well as retained taxes, which are recoverable through tax returns or offsetting. The main recoverable taxes are ISR, IMPAC, IETU and tax on cash deposits (IDE).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In 2003, the Company filed a request with the tax authorities regarding the confirmation of the criteria with respect to the basis that the
Company could use to calculate IMPAC. The Company requested that such calculation, based on the interpretations of tax law as published by the Mexican Treasury Department, should only take into account the amount effectively paid by AMP for the
shares of the Company that was reflected in the assets in each concession acquired through the bidding process.

After several legal
procedures, on August 29, 2006, the Mexican Treasury Department confirmed the criteria for the Aguascalientes, Hermosillo, La Paz, Los Mochis, Morelia and Manzanillo airports, reducing the asset tax basis for these airports. Thus, for these
airports, the base used to calculate tax on assets considers only the amount effectively paid by AMP for its 15% of the shares of the Company. This generated a recoverable tax as of December 31, 2006 for Ps. 190,537, plus Ps. 18,026 of
interest, for a total recoverable asset of Ps. 208,563, recognized within the current recoverable income tax asset.

In 2007, the Company
received a refund of Ps. 146,407, and Ps. 62,156 for the difference were rejected by tax authority. The majority of this amount was recovered through different legal procedures that concluded in 2010 with the refunded amounts, while the remainder
could not be recovered were cancelled in the income statement in which was unfavorable judgment corresponding.

As of December 31,
2013, the remaining portion pending to be recovered corresponds to the Hermosillo airport for Ps. 27,258 (interest included). The tax authorities determined that recoverable amount should be the result of the ISR calculation for the year and not be
treated as an overpayment of taxes for the year. The risk with the resolution criteria is that the right to receive the refund of the amounts claimed will expire, as well as the favorable interest being sought by the Company. In a resolution dated
October 25, 2013, the Company received a favorable ruling, however the authority filed for a review, which is pending to be concluded. Based on the opinion of its legal counsel, management believes a favorable outcome is probable.

For the Guadalajara, Los Cabos, Tijuana, Guanajuato, Puerto Vallarta and Mexicali airports, on May 20 and 24, 2011, the Company received a
resolution related to a sentence issued on June 5, 2009. In these documents, the tax authority establishes that the airports have to calculate the IMPAC base considering 100% of the assets utilized as part of their operations, which management
believes are based on improper arguments associated with ownership percentages and utilizing tax consolidation rules, which are not applicable for the airports. The Companys management based on the advice of certain of its legal advisors does
not believe there are sufficient elements to recover the amounts paid and has therefore not recognized an asset for such amounts in the consolidated statement of financial position, given that these lawsuits are already concluded.

The balances of recoverable taxes are comprised as follows:



|                     |  |                   |        |  |                   |     |         | 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ |  | ----------------- | --- | ------- | 
|                     |  | December 31,
2013 |        |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Recoverable taxes:   |  |                   |        |  |                   |     |         | 
|IMPAC                |  | Ps.               | 33,893 |  |                   | Ps. | 61,469  | 
|ISR                  |  |                   | 23,016 |  |                   |     | 16,395  | 
|Value added tax      |  |                   | 5,601  |  |                   |     | 12,253  | 
|Tax to cash deposits |  |                   | 3,303  |  |                   |     | 8,579   | 
|IETU                 |  |                   | 1,986  |  |                   |     | 1,292   | 
|Retained taxes       |  |                   | 10,559 |  |                   |     | 13,152  | 
|Other                |  |                   | 4,488  |  |                   |     | 1,229   | 
|                     |  |                   |        |  |                   |     |         | 
|                     |  | Ps.               | 82,846 |  |                   | Ps. | 114,369 | 
|                     |  |                   |        |  |                   |     |         | 



F-35



---

##### Table of Contents

| | c. | Income Tax Income tax expense for the years ended at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|         |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |  
|-------- |  | ---- | -------- | - | ---- | --- | -------- | ---- |  | --- | -------- | -
|         |  | 2013 |          |   | 2012 |     |          | 2011 | 
|ISR:     |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |  
|Current  |  | Ps.  | 644,932  |   |      | Ps. | 546,592  |      |  | Ps. | 473,661  |  
|Deferred |  |      | (577,016 | ) |      |     | (221,662 | )    |  |     | (222,061 | )
|IETU:    |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |  
|Current  |  |      | 8,634    |   |      |     | 5,168    |      |  |     | 6,862    |  
|Deferred |  |      | (762     | ) |      |     | (2,649   | )    |  |     | 3,296    |  
|         |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |  
|         |  | Ps.  | 75,788   |   |      | Ps. | 327,449  |      |  | Ps. | 261,758  |  
|         |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |          |  



| | d. | Effective tax rate The reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2013,
2012 and 2011 is shown below:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             |  |   |     |    |      |     |           |   |  |  |      |    |  |     |           |   |      |  |     |    |  |     |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | --- | -- | ---- | --- | --------- | - |  |  | ---- | -- |  | --- | --------- | - | ---- |  | --- | -- |  | --- | --------- | -
|                                                             |  | % |     |    | 2013 |     |           | % |  |  | 2012 |    |  | %   |           |   | 2011 | 
|Net income                                                   |  |   |     |    |      | Ps. | 2,246,230 |   |  |  |      |    |  | Ps. | 1,772,030 |   |      |  |     |    |  | Ps. | 1,611,580 |  
|Income tax expense                                           |  |   |     |    |      |     | 75,788    |   |  |  |      |    |  |     | 327,449   |   |      |  |     |    |  |     | 261,758   |  
|                                                             |  |   |     |    |      |     |           |   |  |  |      |    |  |     |           |   |      |  |     |    |  |     |           |  
|Income before income taxes                                   |  |   |     |    |      |     | 2,322,018 |   |  |  |      |    |  |     | 2,099,479 |   |      |  |     |    |  |     | 1,873,338 |  
|Statutory tax rate                                           |  |   | 30  | %  |      |     | 696,605   |   |  |  | 30   | %  |  |     | 629,844   |   |      |  | 30  | %  |  |     | 562,001   |  
|Effects of tax inflation on nonmonetary assets               |  |   | (16 | %) |      |     | (371,523  | ) |  |  | (15  | %) |  |     | (314,922  | ) |      |  | (16 | %) |  |     | (299,733  | )
|Effects of change in tax rate                                |  |   | (9  | %) |      |     | (199,048  | ) |  |  |     |    |  |     |          |   |      |  |    |    |  |     |          |  
|Effect of change in tax depreciation rates of the Concession |  |   | (2  | %) |      |     | (44,437   | ) |  |  |     |    |  |     |          |   |      |  |    |    |  |     |          |  
|Other                                                        |  |   | (0  | %) |      |     | (5,809    | ) |  |  | 1    | %  |  |     | 12,527    |   |      |  | (0  | %) |  |     | (510      | )
|                                                             |  |   |     |    |      |     |           |   |  |  |      |    |  |     |           |   |      |  |     |    |  |     |           |  
|Effective tax rate                                           |  |   | 3   | %  |      | Ps. | 75,788    |   |  |  | 16   | %  |  | Ps. | 327,449   |   |      |  | 14  | %  |  | Ps. | 261,758   |  
|                                                             |  |   |     |    |      |     |           |   |  |  |      |    |  |     |           |   |      |  |     |    |  |     |           |  

During 2013, tax amortization rates for the concession were changed in the Aguascalientes, La Paz, Los Mochis,
Manzanillo, Morelia and Mexicali airports.



F-36



---

##### Table of Contents

| | e. | Recognized deferred income tax assets and liabilities At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the main items comprising the deferred income tax are:
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------ | --------- |  | --------- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | ---- |  |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | --- | --------- |  |  | --- | --------- | -
|                                                          |  | Assets |           |  | Liability |     |           | Net  | 
|                                                          |  | 2013   |           |  | 2012      |     |           | 2013 |  |     | 2012 |  |  | 2013 |         |   | 2012 |    
|Deferred ISR asset (liability):                           |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Allowance for doubtful accounts                           |  | Ps.    | 43,222    |  |           | Ps. | 60,773    |      |  | Ps. |     |  |  | Ps.  |        |   |      | Ps. | 43,222    |  |  | Ps. | 60,773    |  
|Machinery and equipment                                   |  |        | 25,954    |  |           |     | 11,652    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 25,954    |  |  |     | 11,652    |  
|Improvements to concession assets                         |  |        | 294,130   |  |           |     | 222,038   |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 294,130   |  |  |     | 222,038   |  
|Airport concessions and rights to use airport facilities  |  |        | 3,830,501 |  |           |     | 3,373,508 |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 3,830,501 |  |  |     | 3,373,508 |  
|Other acquired rights                                     |  |        | 100,816   |  |           |     | 88,777    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 100,816   |  |  |     | 88,777    |  
|Derivative financial instruments                          |  |        | 17        |  |           |     | 4,317     |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 17        |  |  |     | 4,317     |  
|Other assets                                              |  |        | 1,421     |  |           |     | 1,077     |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 1,421     |  |  |     | 1,077     |  
|Tax loss carryforwards                                    |  |        | 52,775    |  |           |     | 56,152    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 52,775    |  |  |     | 56,152    |  
|Employee benefits                                         |  |        | 21,190    |  |           |     |          |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 21,190    |  |  |     |          |  
|Accruals                                                  |  |        | 11,930    |  |           |     |          |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 11,930    |  |  |     |          |  
|Recoverable tax on assets                                 |  |        | 291,731   |  |           |     | 335,272   |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 291,731   |  |  |     | 335,272   |  
|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Deferred ISR asset (liability)                            |  |        | 4,673,687 |  |           |     | 4,153,566 |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     | 4,673,687 |  |  |     | 4,153,566 |  
|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Deferred IETU asset (liability):                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Accounts receivable                                       |  |        |          |  |           |     |          |      |  |     |     |  |  |      | (28,335 | ) |      |     |          |  |  |     | (28,335   | )
|Accounts payable                                          |  |        |          |  |           |     | 17,131    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     |          |  |  |     | 17,131    |  
|Provisions                                                |  |        |          |  |           |     | 2,014     |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     |          |  |  |     | 2,014     |  
|Liabilities for retirement benefits                       |  |        |          |  |           |     | 10,551    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      |        |   |      |     |          |  |  |     | 10,551    |  
|Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings |  |        |          |  |           |     |          |      |  |     |     |  |  |      | (2,123  | ) |      |     |          |  |  |     | (2,123    | )
|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Deferred IETU asset (liability)                           |  |        |          |  |           |     | 29,696    |      |  |     |     |  |  |      | (30,458 | ) |      |     |          |  |  |     | (762      | )
|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  
|Deferred income tax asset (liability)                     |  | Ps.    | 4,673,687 |  |           | Ps. | 4,183,262 |      |  | Ps. |     |  |  | Ps.  | (30,458 | ) |      | Ps. | 4,673,687 |  |  | Ps. | 4,152,804 |  
|                                                          |  |        |           |  |           |     |           |      |  |     |      |  |  |      |         |   |      |     |           |  |  |     |           |  



| | f. | Unrecognized deferred income tax assets Unrecognized deferred income tax assets in the statement of financial position is comprised of the following items:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 
|------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ------- | 
|                          |  | December 31,
2013 |         |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Tax loss carryforwards    |  | Ps.               | 174,633 |  |                   | Ps. | 123,496 | 
|Recoverable tax on assets |  |                   | 236,385 |  |                   |     | 241,455 | 
|                          |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 
|                          |  | Ps.               | 411,018 |  |                   | Ps. | 364,951 | 
|                          |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 

The Company does not recognize deferred tax assets on tax loss carryforwards for which it is not probable to
generate future taxable profits to utilize such tax losses.

As disclosed in this Note, the recoverable tax on assets will expire in 2017.
The recoverable income tax from recoverable tax on assets detailed above has not been recognized because the Companys financial projections indicate it is not likely to be recovered.

The Company does not recognize deferred tax assets relating to temporary differences between the accounting and tax value of investments in
subsidiaries, as it has the power to control the reversal date of those temporary differences, and does not expect them to reverse in the foreseeable future.



F-37



---

##### Table of Contents

| | g. | Deferred income tax from tax loss carryforwards The Company generated tax loss carryforwards in the airports of Aguascalientes, Los Mochis, Manzanillo and Morelia, and at Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. The Company estimates tax loss carryforwards will be recoverable in the airports of Aguascalientes and Morelia and in Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., according to the amounts shown in the
following table. With respect to tax legislation relative to concessions, such losses will expire in 2048, except for the tax losses of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., which expire in 2020. Tax losses that can be recovered
based on managements financial projections are recognized as part of the deferred tax asset.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- | - | ----------------- | --- | -------- | -
|                                    |  | December 31,
2013 |          |   | December 31,
2012 |    
|Tax loss carryforwards              |  | Ps.               | 758,025  |   |                   | Ps. | 641,599  |  
|Unrecognized tax loss carryforwards |  |                   | (582,109 | ) |                   |     | (441,056 | )
|                                    |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  
|Recognized tax loss carryforwards   |  | Ps.               | 175,916  |   |                   | Ps. | 200,543  |  
|                                    |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  



| | h. | Balances and movements in deferred taxes during the period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | - | -------------------------- | --- | ------- | ----------------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------- | - |  | -------------------------- | --------- | - | ----------------------------- | --- | -------- | ----------------------------- |  | --- | -------- | - |  | --- | --------- | 
|                                                          |  | Balance as ofJanuary 1,
2012 |           |   | Effects in
profit and loss |     |         | Allocation torecoverabletaxes |  |     | Balance as ofDecember 31,2012 |   |  | Effects in
profit and loss |           |   | Allocation torecoverabletaxes |     |          | Balance as ofDecember 31,2013 | 
|Temporary differences for the deferred ISR:               |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Allowance for doubtful accounts                           |  | Ps.                          | 61,747    |   |                            | Ps. | (974)   |                               |  | Ps. |                              |   |  | Ps.                        | 60,773    |   |                               | Ps. | (17,551) |                               |  | Ps. |         |   |  | Ps. | 43,222    | 
|Machinery, equipment and improvements on leased buildings |  |                              | 10,743    |   |                            |     | 909     |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 11,652    |   |                               |     | 14,302   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 25,954    | 
|Improvements to concession assets                         |  |                              | 188,839   |   |                            |     | 33,199  |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 222,038   |   |                               |     | 72,092   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 294,130   | 
|Airport concessions and rights to use airport facilities  |  |                              | 3,230,160 |   |                            |     | 143,348 |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 3,373,508 |   |                               |     | 456,993  |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 3,830,501 | 
|Other acquired rights                                     |  |                              | 83,596    |   |                            |     | 5,181   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 88,777    |   |                               |     | 12,039   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 100,816   | 
|Derivative financial instruments                          |  |                              | 3,119     |   |                            |     | 1,198   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 4,317     |   |                               |     | (4,300   | )                             |  |     |         |   |  |     | 17        | 
|Other assets                                              |  |                              | 1,483     |   |                            |     | (406    | )                             |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 1,077     |   |                               |     | 344      |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 1,421     | 
|Tax loss carryforwards                                    |  |                              | 53,273    |   |                            |     | 2,879   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 56,152    |   |                               |     | (3,377   | )                             |  |     |         |   |  |     | 52,775    | 
|Employee benefits                                         |  |                              |          |   |                            |     |        |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            |          |   |                               |     | 21,190   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 21,190    | 
|Accruals                                                  |  |                              |          |   |                            |     |        |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            |          |   |                               |     | 11,930   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     | 11,930    | 
|Recoverable tax on assets                                 |  |                              | 344,969   |   |                            |     | 36,328  |                               |  |     | (46,025                       | ) |  |                            | 335,272   |   |                               |     | 13,354   |                               |  |     | (56,895  | ) |  |     | 291,731   | 
|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Total                                                     |  |                              | 3,977,929 |   |                            |     | 221,662 |                               |  |     | (46,025                       | ) |  |                            | 4,153,566 |   |                               |     | 577,016  |                               |  |     | (56,895  | ) |  |     | 4,673,687 | 
|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Temporary differences for the deferred IETU:              |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Accounts receivable                                       |  |                              | (23,324   | ) |                            |     | (5,011  | )                             |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | (28,335   | ) |                               |     | 28,335   |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|Accounts payable                                          |  |                              | 11,248    |   |                            |     | 5,883   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 17,131    |   |                               |     | (17,131  | )                             |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|Provisions                                                |  |                              | 2,231     |   |                            |     | (217    | )                             |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 2,014     |   |                               |     | (2,014   | )                             |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|Liabilities for retirement benefits                       |  |                              | 8,380     |   |                            |     | 2,171   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | 10,551    |   |                               |     | (10,551  | )                             |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|Machinery and equipment                                   |  |                              | (1,946    | ) |                            |     | (177    | )                             |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | (2,123    | ) |                               |     | 2,123    |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Total                                                     |  |                              | (3,411    | ) |                            |     | 2,649   |                               |  |     |                              |   |  |                            | (762      | ) |                               |     | 762      |                               |  |     |         |   |  |     |          | 
|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 
|Total for ISR and IETU:                                   |  | Ps.                          | 3,974,518 |   |                            | Ps. | 224,311 |                               |  | Ps. | (46,025)                      |   |  | Ps.                        | 4,152,804 |   |                               | Ps. | 577,778  |                               |  | Ps. | (56,895) |   |  | Ps. | 4,673,687 | 
|                                                          |  |                              |           |   |                            |     |         |                               |  |     |                               |   |  |                            |           |   |                               |     |          |                               |  |     |          |   |  |     |           | 



F-38



---

##### Table of Contents

| | i. | As a result of the enactment of IETU law beginning in 2008, specifically with respect to the third transitory article, the Company has ten years to recover, under specific circumstances, existing IMPAC paid in previous
years, which as of December 31, 2013 amounted to Ps. 528,116. The previously mentioned article establishes the right to recover the tax on assets paid prior to the IETU law enactment date. However, to obtain a refund there are certain
requirements that must be met, including: i) the tax on assets subject to recovery must have been paid over the previous ten years, ii) the ISR has to be higher than the tax on assets for the three years prior to 2008, and iii) is limited to
10% per year over the IMPAC effectively paid.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are several interpretations as to how an entity can recover the tax
on assets paid, but to the date there is no explicit definition from the tax authorities or a precedent from any court that provides clarity as to the proper manner in which to recover such amounts. The Companys management believes it is not
probable that they will recover certain amounts and has therefore not recognized an asset of Ps. 236,385 as of December 31, 2013. The remaining amount of recoverable tax on assets is comprised of Ps. 201,686 (nominal value) and Ps. 90,045 of
interest for the period from 2002 to 2013.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the recoverable tax on assets is comprised as follows:



|                                            |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- | - | ----------------- | --- | -------- | -
|                                            |  | December 31,
2013 |          |   | December 31,
2012 |    
|Recoverable tax on assets paid              |  | Ps.               | 528,116  |   |                   | Ps. | 576,727  |  
|Unrecognized recoverable tax on assets paid |  |                   | (236,385 | ) |                   |     | (241,455 | )
|                                            |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  
|Recognized recoverable tax on assets        |  | Ps.               | 291,731  |   |                   | Ps. | 335,272  |  
|                                            |  |                   |          |   |                   |     |          |  

At December 31, 2013, the recoverable tax on assets paid is comprised as follows:



|                |  |                                           |        |  |                                                          |     |         |       |  |     |         | 
|--------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------- | --- | ------- | ----- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                |  | Tax on assetsrecoverable from 2013results |        |  | Tax on assets expectedto be recoverable from2014 to 2017 |     |         | Total | 
|Bajio           |  | Ps.                                       | 556    |  |                                                          | Ps. | 1,158   |       |  | Ps. | 1,714   | 
|Guadalajara     |  |                                           | 17,807 |  |                                                          |     | 52,322  |       |  |     | 70,129  | 
|Puerto Vallarta |  |                                           | 2,621  |  |                                                          |     | 2,761   |       |  |     | 5,382   | 
|Tijuana         |  |                                           | 47,591 |  |                                                          |     | 166,915 |       |  |     | 214,506 | 
|                |  |                                           |        |  |                                                          |     |         |       |  |     |         | 
|Total           |  | Ps.                                       | 68,575 |  |                                                          | Ps. | 223,156 |       |  | Ps. | 291,731 | 
|                |  |                                           |        |  |                                                          |     |         |       |  |     |         | 



|15. | Accounts Payable
|--- | ----------------

The Company receives credit from its suppliers at 30 and 45 days
without charging interest, whereby the provider payment policy is to pay the maximum term granted. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements there is no supplier that represents more than 10% of its investments in productive assets
and/or the total operating costs.



|                              |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 
|----------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ------- | 
|                              |  | December 31,
2013 |         |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|Suppliers                     |  | Ps.               | 245,848 |  |                   | Ps. | 310,003 | 
|Advance payments from clients |  |                   | 34,357  |  |                   |     | 36,010  | 
|Interest payable              |  |                   | 16,996  |  |                   |     | 20,528  | 
|Direct employee benefits      |  |                   | 15,330  |  |                   |     | 8,710   | 
|Others accounts payable       |  |                   | 3,702   |  |                   |     | 974     | 
|                              |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 
|Total                         |  | Ps.               | 316,233 |  |                   | Ps. | 376,225 | 
|                              |  |                   |         |  |                   |     |         | 

Advanced payments from clients represent payments for future services that have not yet been provided and if
they are not performed, the Company has the obligation to reimburse it to its customers.



F-39



---

##### Table of Contents

|16. | Bank loans
|--- | ----------

Since 2007 the Company has obtained bank loans to finance its capital
investments committed in the MDP of Bajío, Guadalajara, Hermosillo, Puerto Vallarta and San Jose del Cabo airports, which are described below with the unpaid balance at each date.



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |              |         |  |              |     |         | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------- |  | ------------ | --- | ------- | 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | December 31, |         |  | December 31, |    
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | 2013         |         |  | 2012         |    
|On August 31, 2007 the Company entered into an unsecured credit agreement, with crossed guarantees by its individual airports with Banamex for a total amount of Ps. 1,214,000, bearing fixed interest at a rate of 8.52%. The
agreement matures in seven years from the date of the borrowing and payments and amortization of principal are required to be made in 28 equal and consecutive quarterly principal and interest payments. Such funds were disbursed: i) the
September 7, 2007 for Ps. 600,000, ii) the January 30, 2008 by Ps. 344,000 and iii) the January 30, 2009 for Ps. 270,000.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |  | Ps.          | 212,500 |  |              | Ps. | 385,929 | 
|On December 9, 2009, the Company entered into contracts for unsecured credit agreements, with crossed guarantees among the individual airports with Banamex and HSBC for Ps. 325,723 from each institution, totaling Ps. 651,446.
The loans bear interest at a variable TIIE rate plus 350 basis points and require quarterly principal and interest payments for a period of seven years. Such funds were disbursed in different dates as follows: i) on December 9, 2009, Ps.
143,754, and ii) on February 3, 2010, Ps. 507,692. On December 6, 2013, the Company notified to Banamex and HSBC that the remaining balance of the amount related to the unsecured loan would be prepaid. The remaining balance was paid on
December 9 and 10, 2013, for Ps. 30,804, respectively. (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |              | 235,714 |  |              |     | 390,387 | 
|On May 26, 2011, the Company entered into a contract for an unsecured credit agreement, with crossed guarantees among the individual airports, with HSBC for Ps. 1,023,980, for the Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, Guadalajara,
Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports. The loans bear interest at a variable 28-day TIIE plus 165 basis points and require quarterly principal and interest payments for a period of seven years. Funds of 2011 were disbursed on different dates as follows
i) on May 26, 2011 for Ps. 184,152, ii) on July 11, 2011 for Ps. 247,142, iii) on December 23, 2011 for Ps. 228,213 iv) on April 10, 2012 by Ps. 95,869, v) on May 25, 2012 by Ps. 40,600, vi) on July 10, 2012 for Ps.
49,769 and vii) the October 11, 2012 for Ps. 67,393. As for the remaining balance of Ps. 110,842, the Company notified HSBC that the remaining amount of the loan would not be utilized, so the total amount of loan was Ps 913,138.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |              | 654,969 |  |              |     | 785,417 | 
|On June 6, 2011, the Company entered into a contract for an unsecured credit agreement, with crossed guarantees among the individual airports, with Banamex for Ps. 551,372, for the Los Cabos, Puerto Vallarta, Guadalajara,
Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports. The loans bear interest at a variable 91-day TIIE plus 135 basis points for the 2011 disbursements, and at the variable 91-day TIIE rate plus 143 basis points for the 2012 disbursements finally is not used. Both
dispositions will require quarterly principal and interest payments for a period of seven 7 years. Funds of 2011 were disbursed on different dates as follows: i) on June 7, 2011for Ps.99,158, ii) on July 11, 2011 for Ps. 133,077, iii) on
December 23, 2011 for Ps. 122,884. On November 7, 2012, the Company notified to Banamex that the remaining balance of the amount ordered by the unsecured loan would be prepaid. The unpaid balance was paid on December 7 and 23, 2012,
for Ps. 77,910 and Ps. 105,329, respectively. An additional payment was made on January 11, 2013 for Ps.104,560, for a total payment of Ps. 287,799, plus the payment corresponding at that date of Ps. 4,753. With these payments this loan was
fully paid. |  |              |        |  |              |     | 109,313 | 



F-40



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |     |           |   |  |     |           |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --- | --------- | - |  | --- | --------- | -
|On August 2, 2012, the Company entered into a contract for an unsecured credit agreement with BBVA Bancomer for Ps. 242,747, with crossed guarantees among the individual airports to a variable interest rate of TIIE 91 days,
plus 120 basis points at quarterly principal and interest, for a period of seven years.Such funds were disbursed in different dates as follows: i) on August 3, 2012 for Ps. 168,530, and ii) on October 11, 2012 for Ps. 74,217.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |     | 202,050   |   |  |     | 236,728   |  
|On November 23, 2012, the Company signed an unsecured credit agreement, with crossed guarantees between the accredited airports, with BBVA Bancomer for Ps. 287,799. The loan bears interest at a variable rate based on the 91-day
TIIE plus 120 basis points at quarterly principal and interest for a period of seven years. Disbursements were held on the following dates: i) on December 5, 2012 for Ps. 46,672, and ii) the December 21, 2012 for Ps. 58,277, and iii) on
January 9, 2013 for Ps. 182,850.                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |     | 253,215   |   |  |     | 104,949   |  
|On April 10, 2013, the Company signed an unsecured credit agreement, with crossed guarantees between the accredited airports, with BBVA Bancomer for Ps. 459,350. The loan bears interest at a variable rate based in the 91-day
TIIE plus 133 basis points and annualized rate that will be equivalent to the rate TIIE plus 138 basis points for disbursements of 2014, with quarterly payments of principal and interest, for a period of seven years. Disbursements of 2013 were held
on the following dates: i) on April 10, 2013 for Ps. 70,796, ii) on July 10, 2013 for Ps. 60,549, iii) September 26, 2013 for Ps. 59,009 and iv) November 11, 2013 for Ps. 115,000. The remaining balance of Ps. 153,996, has not
been utilized. |  |     | 296,028   |   |  |     |          |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |     |           |   |  |     |           |  
|Total unpaid balance of bank loans                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |     | 1,854,476 |   |  |     | 2,012,723 |  
|Less  Current portion                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |     | (637,577  | ) |  |     | (555,925  | )
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |     |           |   |  |     |           |  
|Long-term portion                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | Ps. | 1,216,899 |   |  | Ps. | 1,456,798 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |     |           |   |  |     |           |  



|(1) | In connection with loans of December 9, 2009, the Company entered into interest rate hedge with Banamex, as explained in Note 13.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The unpaid consolidated balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, from the loans previously described, mature as follows:



|           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|---------- |  | ----------------- | --------- |  | ----------------- | --- | --------- | 
|Year       |  | December 31,
2013 |           |  | December 31,
2012 |    
|2013       |  | Ps.               |          |  |                   | Ps. | 555,925   | 
|2014       |  |                   | 637,577   |  |                   |     | 425,183   | 
|2015       |  |                   | 300,720   |  |                   |     | 324,040   | 
|2016       |  |                   | 259,507   |  |                   |     | 282,826   | 
|2017       |  |                   | 249,863   |  |                   |     | 198,251   | 
|Thereafter |  |                   | 406,809   |  |                   |     | 226,499   | 
|           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 
|           |  | Ps.               | 1,854,476 |  |                   | Ps. | 2,012,723 | 
|           |  |                   |           |  |                   |     |           | 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, bank loans are payable by the following airport subsidiaries:

At December 31, 2013



|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 
|----------------- |  | ------- | ------- |  | --------- | --- | --------- | ----- |  | --- | --------- | 
|Airport           |  | Current |         |  | Long-Term |     |           | Total | 
|Bajio             |  | Ps.     | 47,786  |  |           | Ps. | 73,023    |       |  | Ps. | 120,809   | 
|Guadalajara       |  |         | 205,527 |  |           |     | 450,406   |       |  |     | 655,933   | 
|Hermosillo        |  |         | 41,794  |  |           |     | 44,202    |       |  |     | 85,996    | 
|Puerto Vallarta   |  |         | 153,718 |  |           |     | 222,932   |       |  |     | 376,650   | 
|San Jose del Cabo |  |         | 188,752 |  |           |     | 426,336   |       |  |     | 615,088   | 
|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 
|Total             |  | Ps.     | 637,577 |  |           | Ps. | 1,216,899 |       |  | Ps. | 1,854,476 | 
|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 



F-41



---

##### Table of Contents

At December 31, 2012



|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 
|----------------- |  | ------- | ------- |  | --------- | --- | --------- | ----- |  | --- | --------- | 
|Airport           |  | Current |         |  | Long-Term |     |           | Total | 
|Bajio             |  | Ps.     | 41,380  |  |           | Ps. | 117,912   |       |  | Ps. | 159,292   | 
|Guadalajara       |  |         | 130,547 |  |           |     | 439,233   |       |  |     | 569,780   | 
|Hermosillo        |  |         | 36,705  |  |           |     | 87,315    |       |  |     | 124,020   | 
|Puerto Vallarta   |  |         | 120,495 |  |           |     | 333,239   |       |  |     | 453,734   | 
|San Jose del Cabo |  |         | 226,798 |  |           |     | 479,099   |       |  |     | 705,897   | 
|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 
|Total             |  | Ps.     | 555,925 |  |           | Ps. | 1,456,798 |       |  | Ps. | 2,012,723 | 
|                  |  |         |         |  |           |     |           |       |  |     |           | 

The loan agreements limit the Companys use of proceeds for the financing of capital expenditures,
working capital and prepayments of loans, in addition to prohibiting the merger of the airport creditors with any other company, as well as the prohibition of sales or transfers of assets in an amount greater than Ps. 1,000, without previous
authorization from the creditors and requires the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. If the individual airports are unable to fulfill their commitments and maintain the minimum financial ratios under the credit agreements, dividends
cannot be declared. As of December 31, 2013, the airports were in compliance with all covenants stipulated by their credit agreements.



|17. | Employee benefits
|--- | -----------------



| | a. | Defined contribution plans  Under Mexican legislation, the Company makes payments equivalent to 2% of its workers daily comprehensive salary to a defined contribution plan that is part of the
retirement savings system. The expense was Ps. 4,214, Ps. 4,346 and Ps. 4,275 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | b. | Defined benefit plans According to the Federal Labor Law in Article 162, the Company is required to pay a seniority premium as postemployment benefits if an employee leaves and if have at least 15
years of service, which consist of a payment of 12 days per worked year based on the last salary, not to exceed twice the legal minimum wage established by law. Additionally, the Company pays as part of its labor policy severance at the employee
retirement age. The present value of the retirement benefit obligation and the current service cost and past service costs were calculated using the projected unit credit method.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The defined benefit plans in Mexico usually expose the Company to actuarial risks, as interest rate, longevity and salary risks.



|                   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Interest rate risk |  | A decrease in the interest rate of the 30 years bond will increase the plan liability.                                                                                                                                                                                               
|                   | 
|Longevity risk     |  | The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the best estimate of the mortality of the plan participants, during and after their employment. An increase in the life expectancy of the plan
participants will increase the plans liability.
|                   | 
|Salary risk        |  | The present value of the defined benefit plan liability is calculated by reference to the future salaries of the plan participants. As such, an increase in the salary of the plan participants will increase the plans
liability.                                                  

The table below shows the movements in the present value of defined benefit obligations:



|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | --- | ------ | -
|                                              |  | 2013 |        |   | 2012 |    
|Defined benefit obligation as of January 1,   |  | Ps.  | 60,290 |   |      | Ps. | 47,897 |  
|Current service cost                          |  |      | 10,576 |   |      |     | 12,593 |  
|Benefits paid                                 |  |      | (234   | ) |      |     | (200   | )
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |  
|Defined benefit obligation as of December 31, |  | Ps.  | 70,632 |   |      | Ps. | 60,290 |  
|                                              |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |  



F-42



---

##### Table of Contents

Below are the amounts for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 that were
recognized in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income:



|                                                    |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |      |  |     |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | --- | ------ | ---- |  | --- | ------ | -
|                                                    |  | 2013 |        |   | 2012 |     |        | 2011 | 
|Current service cost                                |  | Ps.  | 5,801  |   |      | Ps. | 7,185  |      |  | Ps. | 7,858  |  
|Interest on obligation                              |  |      | 4,853  |   |      |     | 4,818  |      |  |     | 4,073  |  
|Actuarial losses (gains)                            |  |      | (78    | ) |      |     | 590    |      |  |     | (105   | )
|                                                    |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |      |  |     |        |  
|Total recognized as employee benefit cost (Note 22) |  | Ps.  | 10,576 |   |      | Ps. | 12,593 |      |  | Ps. | 11,826 |  
|                                                    |  |      |        |   |      |     |        |      |  |     |        |  

The main actuarial assumptions at the reporting date (expressed as weighted average nominal rates) are shown
below:



|                                                              |  |      |     |   |      |  |     |  
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | - | ---- |  | --- | -
|                                                              |  | 2013 |     |   | 2012 | 
|Discount of the projected benefit obligation at present value |  |      | 7.0 | % |      |  | 7.0 | %
|Salary increase                                               |  |      | 5.0 | % |      |  | 5.0 | %

The discount rate is determined based on the structure of the interest rate curve of government bonds for 30
years. The net interest cost on the retirement benefit obligation is recorded in profit and loss within the cost of services, in conjunction with the other components of liabilities for retirement benefits.

If the discount rate had a variation of 100 basis points upward or downward, the effect on the liability for retirement benefit are estimated
to be approximately Ps. 2,870, as increase or as decrease.

Assumptions related to expected mortality are based on statistics and
experience of the Mexican population. The average life expectancy of an individual retiring at age 65 is 17 years for men and 19 years for women (Demographic Mortality Experience for Active people, EMSSA 1997).



|18. | Stockholders equity
|--- | --------------------



| | a. | At December 31, 2013 and 2012, common stock consists of the following:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|------------- |  | --------- | ----------- |  | ------- | --- | ---------- | 
|              |  | Number of |             |  | Nominal |    
|              |  | Shares    |             |  | Value   |    
|Fixed Capital |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|Series B      |  |           | 476,850,000 |  |         | Ps. | 13,130,223 | 
|Series BB     |  |           | 84,150,000  |  |         |     | 2,317,099  | 
|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|Total         |  |           | 561,000,000 |  |         | Ps. | 15,447,322 | 
|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 

At December 31, 2011, common stock consists of the following:



|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|------------- |  | --------- | ----------- |  | ------- | --- | ---------- | 
|              |  | Number of |             |  | Nominal |    
|              |  | Shares    |             |  | Value   |    
|Fixed Capital |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|Series B      |  |           | 476,850,000 |  |         | Ps. | 13,616,849 | 
|Series BB     |  |           | 84,150,000  |  |         |     | 2,402,974  | 
|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 
|Total         |  |           | 561,000,000 |  |         | Ps. | 16,019,823 | 
|              |  |           |             |  |         |     |            | 

At December 31, 2013, all shares are fully subscribed and paid. The Companys shares are represented
by common ordinary shares and without nominal value. Series BB shares, which may represent up to 15% of common stock, may only be transferred upon prior conversion into Series B shares, based on certain time restrictions.



F-43



---

##### Table of Contents

Each share of Series B and BB gives the holder the right to one vote at
any Ordinary Stockholders Meeting. According to the Companys bylaws, shareholders of Series B shares either individually or jointly with their related parties, cannot hold more than 10% of the total outstanding common stock
of the Company, and therefore is prohibited from exceeding such limits by participating through trusts, agreements, social pacts or bylaws, pyramid schemes or any other mechanism that provides a larger share than legally allowed. Additionally, the
Companys bylaws provide that if a person individually or jointly with its related parties, acquires a percentage of shares exceeding the limits of participation previously mentioned, the person or group of persons will be required to sell the
excess over what is allowed through a public offering, during which time, the shares owned over the 10% threshold by such individuals will not have voting rights and cannot be represented in any Stockholder Meeting. Furthermore, the shareholders of
Series BB shares, either individually or jointly with their related parties, may also be owners of shares of Series B shares, regardless of the shares they hold in the aggregate of Series B and Series
BB. However, those shareholders of the Series BB shares, their votes will be limited to no more than 10% of the voting common stock, and any additional participation is required to vote in the same way of the majority of the
votes in any Stockholder Meeting.

Shareholders of Series BB shares are entitled to elect four members to the board of
directors and their alternates, whereas shareholders of Series B shares with rights to vote, even limited or restricted, that individually or together owning 10% or more of the Companys capital stock is entitled to elect one member
to the board of directors at a Stockholders Meeting, an in such instances, such shareholder or group of shareholders may not exercise the right to vote for the board members corresponding to the majority. If any shareholder or group of
shareholders representing at least 10% of the common shares of which the common stock is comprised, exercises the right to appoint a board member, such shareholder will not have the right to vote in the designation of the board members that
correspond to appointment by the majority of Series B shareholders. The total number of members of the Board of Directors of the Company is 11, therefore holders of Series B shares have the right to appoint only seven
members.

The members of the Board of Directors appointed by the Shareholders of the Series BB will have the ability to make
the following valid designations: (i) upon consultation with the Companys Nomination and Compensation Committee, appointment and dismissal of the Chief Executive Officer and the top-level executive officers; (ii) appointment of three
of the six members of the Operating Committee and three alternates, and the number of members and their alternates to the Audit Committee, including the acquisition, nominatios and compensation corresponding to 20% (twenty percent) of the total
members, with the understanding that there will be at least one member and alternate, for each of them, iii) in the creation and determination of the Operating Committee whom are not part of the Company, members of the Board of Directors or the
Companys officers.

In the case of the Audit Committee must also comply with the legal restrictions of independence.



| | b. | At an Ordinary Stockholders Meeting held on April 27, 2011, the stockholders approved a dividend payment of Ps. 1.4424 per share to be made on or before May 31, 2011, and a second payment of Ps.
0.4807 per share to be made on or before November 30, 2011. Both dividends were paid in cash on May 31, 2011 for a total of Ps. 780,000, and on November 29, 2011 for a total of Ps. 255,117. On the same day, the stockholders
approved the cancellation of the remainder of the stock repurchase program, approved at the Ordinary General Stockholders Meeting held from July 22 to July 25, 2010 for Ps. 86,198. Additionally, the stockholders approved a stock
repurchase program to repurchase up to a maximum amount of Ps. 473,500 to be executed as the Companys management determines it is convenient or necessary, in accordance with the Securities Market Law.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | c. | During 2011, the Company repurchased a total of 16,364,500 shares for Ps. 777,493, which represented 2.9% of outstanding shares at such time. From the total shares repurchased during 2011, 6,302,700 shares costing Ps.
303,993 corresponded to the amount approved at the General Stockholders Meetings on July 25, 2010, which authorized the repurchase for up to Ps. 1,000,000; additionally, the Company repurchased 10,061,800 shares costing Ps. 473,500,
corresponding to the amount approved at the General Stockholders Meeting on April 27, 2011 in order to repurchase shares for up to Ps. 473,500. The calculation of weighted average shares outstanding, in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive income, includes the effect of the repurchased shares during 2011.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-44



---

##### Table of Contents

| | d. | In an Ordinary Stockholders Meeting held on April 16, 2012, the stockholders approved a dividend payment of Ps. 1,130,000, to be divided between the shares outstanding at the date of each payment, excluding
shares repurchased in accordance with the Article 56 of the Securities Market Law. The first paid was in cash on may 31, 2012 for Ps. 847,500, and the second payment was made on November 1, 2012 for Ps. 282,500. In the same Stockholders
Meeting, the stockholders approved a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to a maximum amount of Ps. 280,000 to be executed in the next twelve-month period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | e. | In an Extraordinary General Stockholders Meeting held on September 25, 2012, the stockholders approved a capital distribution to be paid in cash for Ps. 870,000, which is comprised of Ps. 572,501 for common
stock with a historical value and Ps. 297,499 for the value of inflation recognized through December 31, 2007 in according with Mexican Financial Reporting Standards. This is because for legal and tax purposes in Mexico, Grupo Aeroportuario del
Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., as an individual entity, will continue preparing and presenting separate financial information under MFRS. Therefore, for any transaction related to Stockholders Equity, the Company must take into consideration
the accounting balances prepared under MFRS and determine the tax effects under applicable laws in Mexico, which require financial information prepared using MFRS.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As a part of the adoption of IFRS, the effects of inflation recognized in the Stockholders Equity under MFRS until December 31,
2007, were reclassified to retained earnings, as the cumulative inflation recognized under IFRS occurred during periods that were not considered to be hyperinflationary in IFRS. As a result, the effects of inflation for the common stock reduction of
Ps. 297,499 recorded under MFRS is presented as a reduction to retained earnings for IFRS purposes, which is the account where these effects were reclassified at the date of transition to IFRS (January 1, 2011).



| | f. | In an Ordinary Stockholders Meeting held on April 16, 2013, the stockholders approved a dividend payment of Ps. 1,210,000 to be divided between the shares outstanding at the date of each payment, excluding
shares repurchased in accordance with Article 56 of the Securities Market Law. The first payment was in cash on April 25, 2013 of Ps. 907,500 and the second payment was made on November 27, 2013 of Ps. 302,500. In the same
stockholder ́s meeting the reserve for repurchase of shares approved at Stockholder ́s Meeting held on April 16, 2012 of Ps. 280,000 was canceled, and simultaneously shareholders approved a maximum amount of Ps. 640,000 for reserve
for repurchase of shares to be executed in the next twelve-month period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During 2013, the Company repurchased a total of
4,127,492 shares, for Ps. 276,732 which represented 0.7% of outstanding shares at such time. The weighted average shares outstanding as shown in the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, includes shares repurchased
during the year 2013, 2011 and 2010.



| | g. | The General Corporate Law requires that at least 5% of the consolidated comprehensive income of the year, be transferred to the legal reserve until the reserve equals 20% of capital stock at par value (nominal pesos).
The legal reserve may be capitalized but may not be distributed, except in the form of stock dividends, until the entity is dissolved. The legal reserve must be replenished if it is reduced for any reason. At December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011,
the legal reserve, in nominal pesos, was Ps. 635,914, Ps. 553,477 and Ps. 479,255, respectively, corresponding to 4.1%, 3.6% and 3.0%, of the common stock, respectively.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | h. | At December 31, 2013, the Company has a maximum amount of funds approved to repurchase shares of the Company for Ps. 2,027,302. From the approved amount, 34,406,892 shares have been repurchased for a total of Ps.
1,664,034, corresponding to repurchases made from September 2010 to December 2013. As of December 31, 2013, there is a remaining balance of Ps. 363,268 available to repurchase shares.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | i. | Stockholders equity distribution, except for the restatement amounts of the common stock contributed and the Net tax income account (CUFIN), will be subject to an ISR tax, calculated at the tax rate applicable to
the distribution year. This corporate level dividend income tax on the distribution of earnings may be applied as a credit against ISR corresponding to the fiscal year in which the dividend was paid and the subsequent two fiscal years following the
date in which the dividend was paid. Starting in 2014, dividends distributed to shareholders and coming from tax retained earnings generated from 2014 and later, will generate an additional income tax of 10% directly attributable to shareholders
receiving the dividend.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-45



---

##### Table of Contents

| | j. | The balances of stockholders equity tax accounts as of December 31 were as follows:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            |                   |  |     |            | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ---------- | ----------------- |  | --- | ---------- | 
|                                   |  | December 31,
2013 |            |  | December 31,
2012 |     |            | December 31,
2011 | 
|Contributed capital account (CUCA) |  | Ps.               | 28,648,014 |  |                   | Ps. | 27,825,247 |                   |  | Ps. | 27,720,753 | 
|Net tax income account (CUFIN)     |  |                   | 1,692,470  |  |                   |     | 1,340,727  |                   |  |     | 1,205,583  | 
|                                   |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            |                   |  |     |            | 
|Total                              |  | Ps.               | 30,340,484 |  |                   | Ps. | 29,165,974 |                   |  | Ps. | 28,926,336 | 
|                                   |  |                   |            |  |                   |     |            |                   |  |     |            | 



|19. | Revenues
|--- | --------

According to the General Law on Airports and its regulations, certain of the
Companys revenues are classified as airport, complementary and commercial services. Airport services generally include the use of airport runways, taxiways and parking areas for arriving and departing planes, use of passenger walkways,
security services, hangars, and, in general, use of the space inside the terminal and other infrastructure by aircraft, passengers and cargo services. These services include rental of space that is vital for the operation of airlines and
complementary service suppliers. Complementary services are ramps and handling services, catering, fuel supply, maintenance and repairs, and traffic and dispatch services. Commercial services include services that are not essential for the operation
of an airport; therefore, these revenues are not regulated by TM, such as car parking services, lease of space to retailers, restaurants and banks, among others.

A price regulation system establishes a maximum rate for airport services and complementary services for each airport for each year in a
five-year period. The maximum rate is the maximum amount of revenues per workload unit that may be earned at an airport each year from regulated sources. Under this regulation, a workload unit is equivalent to one passenger (excluding
transit passengers) or 100 kilograms (220 pounds) of cargo. As of December 2009, SCT authorized the Companys maximum rates applicable for the period 2010-2014. During the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company charged
up to 100% for 2013 and 2012, and 99.9% for 2011, of the maximum rate.

The table below presents a summary for the years ended
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, of the Companys revenues (these do not include revenues related to improvements to concession assets under IFRIC 12). Using the Airports Law classification, the information is sent to the SCT to comply
with the Companys reporting obligations with respect to regulated and unregulated revenues, which are classified as either aeronautical or non-aeronautical revenues. For this presentation, access fee are classified as airport services.



F-46



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                           |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | 
|                                                                                           |  | 2013 |           |  | 2012 |     |           | 2011 | 
|Regulated revenues                                                                         |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Airport operating services to airlines:                                                    |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Landing                                                                                    |  | Ps.  | 176,995   |  |      | Ps. | 170,659   |      |  | Ps. | 157,683   | 
|Charges for not canceling extended stay reservations                                       |  |      | 1,443     |  |      |     | 132       |      |  |     | 3,826     | 
|Parking on embarking/disembarking platform                                                 |  |      | 130,714   |  |      |     | 123,406   |      |  |     | 115,086   | 
|Parking on extended stay or overnight platform                                             |  |      | 29,598    |  |      |     | 30,672    |      |  |     | 29,229    | 
|Passenger walkways and shuttle buses                                                       |  |      |          |  |      |     | 22,592    |      |  |     | 24,284    | 
|Airport security charges                                                                   |  |      | 49,661    |  |      |     | 44,615    |      |  |     | 40,852    | 
|Airport real estate services to airlines:                                                  |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Leasing of hangars to airlines                                                             |  |      | 6,239     |  |      |     | 10,783    |      |  |     | 15,582    | 
|Leasing of shops, warehouses and stockrooms to airlines (operating)                        |  |      | 2,209     |  |      |     | 2,393     |      |  |     | 2,583     | 
|Leasing of space and other terminal facilities to airlines within the terminal (operating) |  |      | 40,577    |  |      |     | 35,912    |      |  |     | 32,196    | 
|Leasing of land and other surfaces to airlines outside the terminal (operating)            |  |      | 2,698     |  |      |     | 2,645     |      |  |     | 2,722     | 
|Leasing of check-in desks and other terminal space                                         |  |      | 9,585     |  |      |     | 11,298    |      |  |     | 11,355    | 
|Leasing of desks and other terminal space for ticket sale                                  |  |      | 5,613     |  |      |     | 5,856     |      |  |     | 5,976     | 
|Airport passenger services:                                                                |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Domestic passenger charges                                                                 |  |      | 1,706,158 |  |      |     | 1,541,208 |      |  |     | 1,406,028 | 
|International passenger charges                                                            |  |      | 1,367,817 |  |      |     | 1,281,598 |      |  |     | 1,150,372 | 
|Airport real estate services and rights of access to other operators                       |  |      | 29,668    |  |      |     | 28,352    |      |  |     | 30,608    | 
|Complementary services:                                                                    |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Catering services                                                                          |  |      | 5,109     |  |      |     | 6,093     |      |  |     | 6,335     | 
|Other third-party ramp services rendered to airlines                                       |  |      | 26,446    |  |      |     | 22,783    |      |  |     | 20,551    | 
|Traffic and/or dispatch                                                                    |  |      | 19,685    |  |      |     | 19,771    |      |  |     | 18,791    | 
|Fuel supply or removal                                                                     |  |      | 1,636     |  |      |     | 1,556     |      |  |     | 1,379     | 
|Third-party airplane maintenance and repair                                                |  |      | 4,765     |  |      |     | 3,658     |      |  |     | 2,489     | 
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total regulated revenues included in the maximum rate                                      |  |      | 3,616,616 |  |      |     | 3,365,982 |      |  |     | 3,077,927 | 
|Regulated revenues not included in the maximum rate:                                       |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Car parking charges                                                                        |  |      | 221,037   |  |      |     | 193,705   |      |  |     | 169,777   | 
|Recovery of cost over aeronautical services                                                |  |      | 78,567    |  |      |     | 58,252    |      |  |     | 27,823    | 
|Recovery of cost over non-aeronautical services                                            |  |      | 15,798    |  |      |     | 13,973    |      |  |     | 12,783    | 
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total regulated revenues not included in the maximum rate                                  |  |      | 315,402   |  |      |     | 265,930   |      |  |     | 210,383   | 
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total regulated revenues                                                                   |  |      | 3,932,018 |  |      |     | 3,631,912 |      |  |     | 3,288,310 | 
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 



F-47



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                                                       |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | 
|                                                                                       |  | 2013 |           |  | 2012 |     |           | 2011 | 
|Unregulated revenues                                                                   |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Commercial concessions (1):                                                            |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Retail operations                                                                      |  |      | 77,845    |  |      |     | 69,282    |      |  |     | 68,835    | 
|Food and beverages                                                                     |  |      | 78,662    |  |      |     | 65,053    |      |  |     | 58,038    | 
|Duty free                                                                              |  |      | 102,577   |  |      |     | 92,466    |      |  |     | 53,747    | 
|VIP lounges                                                                            |  |      | 9,378     |  |      |     | 9,251     |      |  |     | 7,617     | 
|Financial services                                                                     |  |      | 16,181    |  |      |     | 14,986    |      |  |     | 13,048    | 
|Communications and networks                                                            |  |      | 13,309    |  |      |     | 5,668     |      |  |     | 7,607     | 
|Car rentals                                                                            |  |      | 99,614    |  |      |     | 90,107    |      |  |     | 80,755    | 
|Commercial leasing                                                                     |  |      | 15,624    |  |      |     | 5,984     |      |  |     | 5,477     | 
|Advertising                                                                            |  |      | 87,304    |  |      |     | 76,206    |      |  |     | 51,039    | 
|Time sharing developers                                                                |  |      | 107,733   |  |      |     | 98,460    |      |  |     | 82,422    | 
|Leasing of space to airlines and other complementary service providers (non-operating) |  |      | 111,763   |  |      |     | 100,551   |      |  |     | 92,146    | 
|VIP Lounges                                                                            |  |      | 24,243    |  |      |     | 10,497    |      |  |     |          | 
|Revenues from sharing of commercial activities(1):                                     |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Retail operations                                                                      |  |      | 15,623    |  |      |     | 11,006    |      |  |     | 9,942     | 
|Food and beverages                                                                     |  |      | 24,476    |  |      |     | 20,958    |      |  |     | 16,310    | 
|Duty free                                                                              |  |      | 12,987    |  |      |     | 20,477    |      |  |     | 17,472    | 
|Financial services                                                                     |  |      | 289       |  |      |     | 359       |      |  |     | 57        | 
|Car rentals                                                                            |  |      | 1,501     |  |      |     | 2,170     |      |  |     | 896       | 
|Advertising                                                                            |  |      |          |  |      |     |          |      |  |     | 2,992     | 
|Access fee for ground transportation                                                   |  |      | 16,549    |  |      |     | 14,159    |      |  |     | 13,358    | 
|Non-airport access fees                                                                |  |      | 23,818    |  |      |     | 19,943    |      |  |     | 18,103    | 
|Services rendered to ASA                                                               |  |      | 44        |  |      |     | 65        |      |  |     | 139       | 
|Various commercial-related revenues                                                    |  |      | 14,892    |  |      |     | 12,104    |      |  |     | 11,678    | 
|Others                                                                                 |  |      | 682       |  |      |     | 2,770     |      |  |     | 2,519     | 
|                                                                                       |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total unregulated revenues                                                             |  |      | 855,090   |  |      |     | 742,522   |      |  |     | 614,197   | 
|                                                                                       |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 
|Total aeronautical and non-aeronautical services                                       |  | Ps.  | 4,787,108 |  |      | Ps. | 4,374,434 |      |  | Ps. | 3,902,507 | 
|                                                                                       |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |           | 



|(1) | Unregulated revenues are earned based on the terms of the Companys operating lease agreements. Lease agreements are based on either a monthly rent (which generally increases each year based on the National
Consumer Price Index (INPC) or the greater of a monthly minimum guaranteed rent or a percentage of the lessees monthly revenues. Monthly rent and minimum guaranteed rent earned on the Companys operating lease agreements are included
under the caption Commercial concessions above. Revenues earned in excess of the minimum guaranteed rent are included in the Revenues from sharing of commercial activities caption above (Note 30).
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revenues from improvements to concession assets are recognized with respect to the additions and improvements made for the Company in its
airports, which are committed under the MDP, and is a requirement of fulfillment. Revenues for the years ended as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 accounted for Ps. 440,728, Ps. 570,233 and Ps. 1,036,227, respectively.



|20. | Cost of services
|--- | ----------------

Cost of services for the years ended December 31, was composed of
the following:



|                               |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |         | 
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | --------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                               |  | 2013 |           |  | 2012 |     |           | 2011 | 
|Employee costs (Note 22)       |  | Ps.  | 390,606   |  |      | Ps. | 402,607   |      |  | Ps. | 369,386 | 
|Maintenance                    |  |      | 200,224   |  |      |     | 200,022   |      |  |     | 179,455 | 
|Safety, security and insurance |  |      | 173,748   |  |      |     | 159,379   |      |  |     | 131,168 | 
|Utilities                      |  |      | 141,855   |  |      |     | 139,479   |      |  |     | 122,095 | 
|Other                          |  |      | 222,518   |  |      |     | 158,515   |      |  |     | 184,834 | 
|                               |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |         | 
|                               |  | Ps.  | 1,128,951 |  |      | Ps. | 1,060,002 |      |  | Ps. | 986,938 | 
|                               |  |      |           |  |      |     |           |      |  |     |         | 



F-48



---

##### Table of Contents

|21. | Depreciation and amortization
|--- | -----------------------------

Depreciation and amortization for the years ended
December 31, were composed of the following:



|             |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|------------ |  | ---- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|             |  | 2013 |         |  | 2012 |     |         | 2011 | 
|Depreciation |  | Ps.  | 164,606 |  |      | Ps. | 151,176 |      |  | Ps. | 110,314 | 
|Amortization |  |      | 718,629 |  |      |     | 676,054 |      |  |     | 632,655 | 
|             |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|             |  | Ps.  | 883,235 |  |      | Ps. | 827,230 |      |  | Ps. | 742,969 | 
|             |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 



|22. | Employee Cost
|--- | -------------

Employee Cost for the years ended December 31, was composed of the
following:



|                           |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|-------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                           |  | 2013 |         |  | 2012 |     |         | 2011 | 
|Wages and salaries         |  | Ps.  | 259,044 |  |      | Ps. | 252,482 |      |  | Ps. | 237,959 | 
|Other remunerations        |  |      | 41,200  |  |      |     | 42,597  |      |  |     | 42,752  | 
|Social benefits            |  |      | 38,255  |  |      |     | 39,629  |      |  |     | 37,427  | 
|Severance payments         |  |      | 7,476   |  |      |     | 21,366  |      |  |     | 6,901   | 
|Labor union fees           |  |      | 14,715  |  |      |     | 16,290  |      |  |     | 13,656  | 
|Taxes on employee benefits |  |      | 5,775   |  |      |     | 5,647   |      |  |     | 5,157   | 
|PTU                        |  |      | 3,754   |  |      |     | 4,203   |      |  |     | 3,813   | 
|Employee benefits          |  |      | 10,576  |  |      |     | 12,593  |      |  |     | 11,826  | 
|Others                     |  |      | 9,811   |  |      |     | 7,800   |      |  |     | 9,895   | 
|                           |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|                           |  | Ps.  | 390,606 |  |      | Ps. | 402,607 |      |  | Ps. | 369,386 | 
|                           |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 



|23. | Cost of improvements to concession assets
|--- | -----------------------------------------

As disclosed in Note 3.m, in conformity with
IFRIC 12, the Company must recognize the revenues and costs of additions and improvements to concession assets which they are obligated to perform at the airports as established by the MDP. The cost for such additions and improvements to concession
assets is based on actual costs incurred by the Company in the execution of the additions or improvements, considering the investment requirements in the MDP. Through bidding processes, the Company contracts third parties to carry out such
construction. The amount of revenues for these services are equal to the amount of costs incurred, as the Company does not obtain any profit margin for these construction services. The amounts paid are set at market value.

Cost of improvements to concession assets are comprised of the following at December 31:



|                                          |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |           | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | --------- | 
|                                          |  | 2013 |         |  | 2012 |     |         | 2011 | 
|Cost of improvements to concession assets |  | Ps.  | 440,728 |  |      | Ps. | 570,233 |      |  | Ps. | 1,036,227 | 
|                                          |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |           | 



|24. | Finance (cost) income  net
|--- | ---------------------------

The finance (cost) income is comprised of the
following at December 31:



|                                                        |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                                                        |  | 2013 |         |  | 2012 |     |         | 2011 | 
|Interest income from cash equivalents                   |  | Ps.  | 94,379  |  |      | Ps. | 105,073 |      |  | Ps. | 74,324  | 
|Interest on recovered taxes                             |  |      | 6,519   |  |      |     | 1,836   |      |  |     | 7,389   | 
|Gain on financial investments held for trading purposes |  |      | 20,926  |  |      |     | 10,479  |      |  |     | 6,632   | 
|Gain on derivative financial instruments                |  |      |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     | 3,530   | 
|Other                                                   |  |      | 2,399   |  |      |     | 4,690   |      |  |     | 16,570  | 
|                                                        |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|Total interest income                                   |  |      | 124,223 |  |      |     | 122,078 |      |  |     | 108,445 | 
|                                                        |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 



F-49



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | -------- | - | ---- | --- | -------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | -
|                                                        |  | 2013 |          |   | 2012 |     |          | 2011 | 
|Interest cost from bank loans                           |  |      | (115,612 | ) |      |     | (102,136 | )    |  |     | (57,220 | )
|Loss on financial investments held for trading purposes |  |      | (51,721  | ) |      |     | (10,475  | )    |  |     | (10,778 | )
|Loss on derivative financial instrument                 |  |      | (705     | ) |      |     | (3,424   | )    |  |     | (6,200  | )
|Commissions for bank loans                              |  |      | (3,019   | ) |      |     | (1,067   | )    |  |     | (13,492 | )
|Other financing costs                                   |  |      | (8,008   | ) |      |     | (4,217   | )    |  |     | (6,063  | )
|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|Total interest expenses                                 |  |      | (179,145 | ) |      |     | (121,319 | )    |  |     | (93,753 | )
|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|Foreign exchange gains                                  |  |      | 79,569   |   |      |     | 49,528   |      |  |     | 83,984  |  
|Foreign exchange loss                                   |  |      | (72,806  | ) |      |     | (64,310  | )    |  |     | (61,358 | )
|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|Foreign exchange gains (loss)  net                     |  |      | 3,763    |   |      |     | (14,782  | )    |  |     | 22,626  |  
|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|Finance (cost) income  net                             |  | Ps.  | (51,159) |   |      | Ps. | (14,023) |      |  | Ps. | 37,318  |  
|                                                        |  |      |          |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  



|25. | Commitments
|--- | -----------



| | a. | The Company has leased office space under a five-year operating lease agreement, renewed in February 2013 and will finish in January 2018. The monthly rental payments are of U.S.$ 33,617. Base rent is subject to
increases according to the INPC and the U.S, National Consumer Price Index (CPI).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lease expense was Ps. 5,187, Ps. 5,424 and
Ps. 4,954, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In addition to the monthly rent described above, the
Company has entered into contracts for other lease agreements of other assets, the amounts of which are not material.



| | b. | On December 28, 2009, the SCT authorized the Companys MDP update for the five-year period from 2010-2014. The table below shows the investments to be made during this period, as approved by the SCT:
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|     |  |                  |           |  |                 |     |           | 
|---- |  | ---------------- | --------- |  | --------------- | --- | --------- | 
|Year |  | Amount
Committed |           |  | Amount
Invested |    
|2010 |  | Ps.              | 553,904   |  |                 | Ps. | 764,430   | 
|2011 |  |                  | 989,456   |  |                 |     | 1,214,730 | 
|2012 |  |                  | 562,217   |  |                 |     | 706,350   | 
|2013 |  |                  | 411,349   |  |                 |     | 522,230   | 
|2014 |  |                  | 253,731   |  |                 |     |          | 
|     |  |                  |           |  |                 |     |           | 
|     |  | Ps.              | 2,770,657 |  |                 | Ps. | 3,207,740 | 
|     |  |                  |           |  |                 |     |           | 

Amounts set forth above are expressed in pesos of purchasing power as of December 31, 2007, and have to
be re-expressed using factors derived from the NCPI at the time of their execution. The amounts invested are expressed in thousands of pesos of each year, and include the improvements to concession assets and the machinery and equipment committed
under the MDP.



|26. | Contingencies
|--- | -------------



| | a. | Several municipalities have filed real estate tax claims against some subsidiary airports related to the land where the airports operate. Based on the opinion of its external legal counsel, the Company believes that
there are no legal grounds for such claims. Therefore, the Company has initiated legal proceedings to invalidate the claims, and, where applicable, related foreclosures or other actions. Although no assurance can be given, the Company does not
expect the resolutions to have any adverse effects on its consolidated financial position or profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-50



---

##### Table of Contents

On June 8, 2005, the Tijuana airport received a municipal real estate tax claim of Ps.
146,442 (nominal value). On February 9, 2006, a bailment contract was issued on behalf of the airport for Ps. 141,770 (nominal pesos) in order to release an encumbrance of certain of its assets. In March 2008, the Tribunal declared the
annulment of the tax claim, but upheld, however, the right for the municipal authorities to claim real estate taxes over commercial areas, thus, the Company filed a legal proceeding against the resolution, but it was denied. As the Tribunal declared
the original tax claim null and void, the bailment was cancelled during 2008.

On October 20, 2010 the municipal authorities of
Tijuana issued another payment request for real estate taxes covering the period from the 2000 to 2010, however, in the opinion of the Companys legal advisors this tax claim is not in accordance with the law, as there is precedent that in
previous occasions the tribunals declared null the first request corresponding to 2005 and 2006. On October 20, 2010, the municipal authorities demanded that the airport pay the required amount of Ps. 269,229 in the following three days,
assigning several of its assets to guarantee such amount in case the airport would not pay. The assigned and encumbered assets do not affect the airports operation. This requirement was challenged by judgment of invalidity, which is yet to be
resolved.

On February 7, 2013, the Tijuana municipal authority filed a fourth real estate tax claim for the period from 2008 to 2012
against the Tijuana airport in the amount of Ps. 15,200, demanding payment within three business days. On February 28, 2013, the Company began an annulment proceeding against the claim. On March 5, 2013 the authority established the amount
to be guaranteed, and on March 8, 2013 the Company presented a bond to guarantee the amount claimed. As of the date of these financial statements, the proceeding is in the stage of presenting evidence by each party.

On February 26, 2013, the municipal authorities of Manzanillo, required the Manzanillo airport to exhibit several documents and answer
several questionings in order to require a property tax payment for the past five years, related with commercial areas and parking lot. On March 20, 2013, the Manzanillo airport filed a judicial annulment lawsuit against this requirement, which
is pending resolution.

As the Company and its legal counsel believe that these tax claims are not in accordance with the law, GAP
proceeded to filed an annulment judgment against the municipal authorities, which is pending resolution. Because, previous judgments in this and other airports have been resolved favorably for the Company, GAP and its legal counsel believe an
unfavorable outcome is remote.



| | b. | In 1970, the Mexican Government expropriated a portion of land occupied by the Tijuana Airport, whereas in Guadalajara airport it occurred in 1975. Before such expropriations, a group of farmers called ejido, one in
Tijuana and other different in Guadalajara, owned these lands. The farmers have raised claims against the indemnity payments received from the Mexican Government, and in Tijuana airport requested the reversion of the expropriation. During 2008, the
Ejido Tampico in Tijuana airport received an unfavorable resolution, which was appealed. Subsequently the Ejido received a favorable resolution, which may affect the perimeter of the airport, due to the lack of information about the shape of the
surface reverted in favor of the Ejido. The lawsuit is still pending to be resolved.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the case of Guadalajara airport, the
Ejido El Zapote and Santa Cruz del Valle presented an appeal with jurisdictional authorities against the SCT and the Reforma Agraria, regarding the expropriation decrees issued to build the airport. In November 2010, the Court granted the
protection of the federal justice to the ejidos El Zapote and Santa Cruz del Valle, in Guadalajara airport, ordained to replace the administrative procedure of expropriation due to a lack of notification to these Ejidos and declared
unsubsistence the Concession granted to the Guadalajara airport in 1998, in reference to manage, operate and develop the airport facilities. On July 10, 2012, the Court revoked this resolution and ordered the reinstatement of the actions in
order to obtain more documentary evidence, for the trial with the Ejido El Zapote, the trial is ongoing. In case of the Ejido Santa Cruz del Valle the district court determinate the illegality of the expropriation decree against the
Federal Government, which was confirmed by the appellate court and is currently under implementation. The legal advisors of the Company considered the Federal Government is working in a substitute compliance, consisting of the payment of
compensation in favor of the ejido Santa Cruz del Valle. Once it is completed the implementation process by the Government, the Company will not have any affectation in the operation or in the results of operations of the airport.



F-51



---

##### Table of Contents

On October 1, 2013, the Company received notices for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico
and Puerto Vallarta airport and various federal authorities in connection with three legal proceedings filed by the participants in the Ejido Valle de Banderas. The Ejido is claiming the restitution or payment as a compensation in respect of 154
hectares of land comprising this airport, besides the partial cancellation of the concession granted to Puerto Vallarta airport. The Company attended the initial appointment on October 8, 2013, at which obtained a deferral until
December 2, 2013 due to the lack of formal notice, which was again deferred, having the first audience on January 24, 2014, where the Ejido ratified the lawsuit and the Company demanded the suspension of this process due to the
incompetence of jurisdiction. Therefore, the audience was delayed for three days, in order to give time to the Ejido to provide a rebuttal. The Company estimates that the court involved in this proceeding, located in the State of Nayarit, does not
have jurisdiction, because the airport is located in the State of Jalisco, besides this court is not competent to nullify an administrative act, as it is related to the concession of title.

If the legal proceedings are resolved in such a way that adversely impact any of our airports, the Company manage has other legal resources to
challenge such resolutions. Additionally, under the Concession agreement, the Company has guarantees providing it with access to the airports land, and the Mexican government would be liable for any operating disruption caused by the
Ejidos and would have to restore the concessionaire the rights to use public property, and compensate any economic damage to the airport. Thus, in the opinion of the Company and its legal counsel, the possibility of an unfavorable outcome is
remote.



| | c. | Federal, state and environmental protection laws regulate the Companys operations. According to these laws, the passing of regulations relating to air and water pollution, environmental impact studies, noise
control and disposal of dangerous and non-dangerous material has been considered. The Federal Environmental Protection Agency has the power to impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties against companies violating environmental laws. It is
also entitled to close any facilities that do not meet legal requirements. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company does not have any environmental sanctions against it.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | d. | The users of airports, principally airlines, have been subject to increased costs following the events of September 11, 2001 in addition to the events on December 26, 2009 in Detroit, Michigan. Airlines have
been required to adopt additional security measures and may be required to comply with more rigorous security guidelines in the future. Because a substantial majority of the Companys international flights involve travel to the U.S., the
Company may be required to comply with security directives of the U.S. Federal Aviation Authority, in addition to the directives of Mexican aviation authorities. The Mexican Government, being part of the International Civil Aviation Organization
(OACI), indirectly accepted a resolution proposed by OACI related to requiring all checked baggage on all commercial flights beginning in January 2006 to undergo a comprehensive screening process. The Company has concluded the installation of new
screening equipment in all airports; however, it could be required to undertake significant additional capital expenditures. The Company has signed agreements with the airlines in which the airlines assumed their legal responsibility for all matters
related to the operation of such equipment, and therefore the Company has accepted the request to operate them, in exchange to charge a fee to recover its expenses incurred. Regarding this, on November 23, 2012 the Mexican Bureau of Civil
Aviation issued a mandatory notice, requiring airlines to use the screening systems through an agreement with the airports.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | e. | Currently, the Mexican tax authority (MTA) carried out tax audits at certain of the Companys airports. As a result of such audits, the MTA claimed that the Aguascalientes, La Paz, Los Mochis, Mexicali and Morelia
airports incorrectly applied the fiscal amortization rates with respect to the value of their respective concessions. The Company has filed administrative proceedings rejecting the claims made by the tax authority and defending its original
position.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-52



---

##### Table of Contents

With respect to the Aguascalientes and La Paz airports, the authority determined a fine of Ps.
1,733 and Ps. 3,700, respectively. These amounts were paid by the airports, however the Company filed a judgment of nullity claiming the refund of these fines. In December 2010, the airports of Aguascalientes and Mexicali received unfavorable
rulings. On August 22, 2011, the Aguascalientes International Airport appealed the decision of the court to the Mexican Supreme Court, concluded unfavorable in 2012, therefore the fine paid was recorded in the consolidated statement of profit
or loss and other comprehensive income. In the case of Mexicali, the ruling was final in 2011 and the tax adjustment resulted in a decrease of the Companys profit or loss and other comprehensive income by Ps. 3,397.

Regarding the La Paz airport, on October 3, 2011 it received a favorable ruling in the first instance, which was appealed by the authority
before the Court of Mazatlan. On September 7, 2012, the Court issued a resolution in favor of the authority, instructing the tribunal to modify its sentence, taking into account the applicable law in 2005 and on November 14, 2012, the
tribunal issued a its sentence accordingly, considering that the authority was correct, however, for purposes of the fine determined that it was inappropriate. The authority filed a petition for review which was denied on January 21, 2014,
confirming that the fine is unfair.

The Morelia airport filed an appeal on October 26, 2011, which was partially ruled in favor of
the airport in September 2012, therefore a legal proceeding was filed against this resolution. Subsequently, the tax authority appealed against this resolution, which on February 28, 2013 was resolved adversely for the airport. According to the
above, on March 14, 2013, the Company paid Ps. 2,900, which included contributions and accessories, concluding with this procedure.

The Los Mochis airport has filed a nullity judgment on October 3, 2011, which was concluded adversely for the airport in July 2012. As a
result, the airport filed a legal proceeding in August 2012, which was denied to the Company in June 2013, concluding this procedure with no effect on results.

During 2013 the Aguascalientes, La Paz, Morelia and Mexicali airports applied to the partial waiver of federal taxes and penalties program,
decreed in the Third Transitory article of Chapter I of the Federal Revenue Law for 2013. Therefore, these airports cancelled all tax reviews that were ongoing and made a payment for the years in which these airports applied different criteria for
amortization of concession tax rates, making a total payment of Ps. 16,297, affecting the profit or loss for the year 2013. The change in amortization tax rates generated an increase in the deferred tax asset, with a benefit to the profit or loss in
2013 of Ps. 35,131.



| | f. | On April, 25, 2011, the Company received a notice from the Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores (National Banking and Securities Commission or CNBV) in which it initiated a proceeding for alleged violations of
Mexican disclosure statutes primarily in connection with disputes among AMPs Stockholders during 2010. This notice is the first stage of the procedure to impose a fine on the Company. On June 3, 2011, the Company exercised its right to
appeal the determination of the CNBV and to file evidence to contest this determination. At of the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements, there is no response from the authority. In the opinion of the Companys management and
its legal counsel, the possibility of an unfavorable outcome is considered to be remote.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | g. | The Company holds several judgments with one of its shareholders Grupo México, SAB de C.V. (GMéxico), who at the date of these consolidated financial statements has a shareholding interest of 27.5 %
of the total share capital of the Companys Series B shares. These disputes have been performed with the objective of defending the bylaws of the Company and its legality and applying, and in defense of certain agreements reached at various
Stockholders Meeting on which GMéxico has challenged its legitimacy. Moreover, the Company has presented legal means of defense against a supposed Stockholders Meeting judicially convened at the request of irregularly by
GMéxico and that the Company does not recognize as valid and also the decisions taken at the meeting. The judgments related to this shareholder are still unresolved. The Companys management and its legal counsel consider that the
potential impact of these judgments in the financial statements is limited to costs and expenses related to legal defense.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-53



---

##### Table of Contents

|27. | Information by operating segment
|--- | --------------------------------

The Company determines and evaluates its airports
individual performances before allocating personnel-related costs and other costs incurred by SIAP, the subsidiary relating to the Companys senior management. It is for this reason that the Company presents its segment information for
airports, which are considered as strategic business units, not by type of service. All airports provide similar services to their customers. For each one of the strategic business the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, review
the internal management reports monthly.

The following table shows a summary of the Companys financial information by segment as it
relates to the Guadalajara, Tijuana, Puerto Vallarta, Los Cabos, Hermosillo and Guanajuato airports. The financial information relating to the remaining six airports are comprised under Other airports. The corresponding information
related with SIAP (company that provides technical assistance and professional services highly qualified), CORSA (company that provides operative services specialized in aeronautical industry), PCP (company that manages the parking lot operation)
and Fundacion GAP, as well as the Companys own operation (including investments in subsidiaries), was combined and included under Other Companies. The elimination of the investment of the Company in its subsidiaries is included
under Eliminations along with any intersegment revenues and other significant intercompany operations. The performance of each segment is measured in base to the income before income taxes, as is reported in the internal financial
statements.



|                                                |  |             |            |   |         |     |           |                |  |     |                  |   |  |            |           |   |       |     |           |               |  |     |                |   |  |              |           |   |       |     |            |   |  |     |             |   |  |     |            |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | ---------- | - | ------- | --- | --------- | -------------- |  | --- | ---------------- | - |  | ---------- | --------- | - | ----- | --- | --------- | ------------- |  | --- | -------------- | - |  | ------------ | --------- | - | ----- | --- | ---------- | - |  | --- | ----------- | - |  | --- | ---------- | -
|December 31, 2013                               |  | Guadalajara |            |   | Tijuana |     |           | PuertoVallarta |  |     | San Jose delCabo |   |  | Hermosillo |           |   | Bajio |     |           | OtherAirports |  |     | OtherCompanies |   |  | Eliminations |           |   | Total |    
|Total external revenues                         |  | Ps.         | 1,935,689  |   |         | Ps. | 692,155   |                |  | Ps. | 650,646          |   |  | Ps.        | 953,427   |   |       | Ps. | 214,048   |               |  | Ps. | 210,827        |   |  | Ps.          | 571,043   |   |       | Ps. |           |   |  | Ps. |            |   |  | Ps. | 5,227,836  |  
|Total intersegment revenues                     |  |             |           |   |         |     |          |                |  |     |                 |   |  |            |          |   |       |     |          |               |  |     |               |   |  |              |          |   |       |     | 2,315,843  |   |  |     | (2,315,843  | ) |  |     |           |  
|Income from operations                          |  |             | 1,056,789  |   |         |     | 324,698   |                |  |     | 304,293          |   |  |            | 527,153   |   |       |     | 86,160    |               |  |     | 82,161         |   |  |              | 21,594    |   |       |     | 1,978,356  |   |  |     | (2,008,027  | ) |  |     | 2,373,177  |  
|Interest income                                 |  |             | 28,188     |   |         |     | 25,163    |                |  |     | 11,442           |   |  |            | 24,722    |   |       |     | 4,944     |               |  |     | 3,918          |   |  |              | 14,175    |   |       |     | 22,311     |   |  |     | (10,639     | ) |  |     | 124,223    |  
|Interest expense                                |  |             | (43,039    | ) |         |     | (20,308   | )              |  |     | (29,312          | ) |  |            | (63,226   | ) |       |     | (8,400    | )             |  |     | (8,738         | ) |  |              | (13,834   | ) |       |     | (2,928     | ) |  |     | 10,639      |   |  |     | (179,145   | )
|Depreciation and amortization for the year      |  |             | (236,456   | ) |         |     | (130,842  | )              |  |     | (126,690         | ) |  |            | (165,055  | ) |       |     | (43,451   | )             |  |     | (40,780        | ) |  |              | (129,562  | ) |       |     | (10,400    | ) |  |     |            |   |  |     | (883,235   | )
|Income before income taxes                      |  |             | 1,042,766  |   |         |     | 330,754   |                |  |     | 286,782          |   |  |            | 490,389   |   |       |     | 82,761    |               |  |     | 77,371         |   |  |              | 21,911    |   |       |     | 1,997,310  |   |  |     | (2,008,026  | ) |  |     | 2,322,018  |  
|Income fax expense                              |  |             | (131,484   | ) |         |     | 20,124    |                |  |     | (8,850           | ) |  |            | (88,308   | ) |       |     | 8,740     |               |  |     | 861            |   |  |              | 76,830    |   |       |     | 46,300     |   |  |     |            |   |  |     | (75,788    | )
|Total assets                                    |  |             | 7,674,175  |   |         |     | 4,646,736 |                |  |     | 3,392,347        |   |  |            | 3,410,018 |   |       |     | 1,260,185 |               |  |     | 1,090,061      |   |  |              | 3,161,276 |   |       |     | 26,744,080 |   |  |     | (26,144,279 | ) |  |     | 25,234,600 |  
|Total Liabilities                               |  |             | 1,010,641  |   |         |     | 208,337   |                |  |     | 549,585          |   |  |            | 841,589   |   |       |     | 145,701   |               |  |     | 176,253        |   |  |              | 309,646   |   |       |     | 197,655    |   |  |     | (417,519    | ) |  |     | 3,021,889  |  
|Net cash flows provided by operating activities |  |             | 1,189,236  |   |         |     | 475,736   |                |  |     | 386,543          |   |  |            | 607,039   |   |       |     | 130,799   |               |  |     | 118,904        |   |  |              | 220,832   |   |       |     | (199,645   | ) |  |     |            |   |  |     | 2,929,444  |  
|Net cash flows used in investing activities     |  |             | (264,420   | ) |         |     | (64,851   | )              |  |     | (40,817          | ) |  |            | (81,566   | ) |       |     | (5,574    | )             |  |     | (24,347        | ) |  |              | (157,060  | ) |       |     | 2,177,952  |   |  |     | (2,185,000  | ) |  |     | (645,682   | )
|Net cash flows used in financing activities     |  |             | (1,099,426 | ) |         |     | (233,000  | )              |  |     | (374,791         | ) |  |            | (390,518  | ) |       |     | (102,835  | )             |  |     | (120,005       | ) |  |              | (156,950  | ) |       |     | (1,486,732 | ) |  |     | 2,185,000   |   |  |     | (1,779,258 | )
|Investment in productive assets                 |  |             | 5,422,418  |   |         |     | 3,058,880 |                |  |     | 2,553,931        |   |  |            | 2,653,619 |   |       |     | 868,406   |               |  |     | 790,676        |   |  |              | 2,302,667 |   |       |     | 37,687     |   |  |     | (69         | ) |  |     | 17,688,217 |  
|                                                |  |             |            |   |         |     |           |                |  |    
|December 31, 2012                               |  | Guadalajara |            |   | Tijuana |     |           | PuertoVallarta |  |     | San Jose delCabo |   |  | Hermosillo |           |   | Bajio |     |           | OtherAirports |  |     | OtherCompanies |   |  | Eliminations |           |   | Total |    
|Total external revenues                         |  | Ps.         | 1,693,317  |   |         | Ps. | 649,593   |                |  | Ps. | 699,454          |   |  | Ps.        | 985,808   |   |       | Ps. | 212,086   |               |  | Ps. | 236,966        |   |  | Ps.          | 467,444   |   |       | Ps. |           |   |  | Ps. |            |   |  | Ps. | 4,944,667  |  
|Total intersegment revenues                     |  |             |           |   |         |     |          |                |  |     |                 |   |  |            |          |   |       |     |          |               |  |     |               |   |  |              |          |   |       |     | 1,922,314  |   |  |     | (1,922,314  | ) |  |     |           |  
|Income from operations                          |  |             | 915,019    |   |         |     | 241,563   |                |  |     | 298,352          |   |  |            | 487,327   |   |       |     | 68,319    |               |  |     | 73,969         |   |  |              | 12,101    |   |       |     | 1,645,731  |   |  |     | (1,628,879  | ) |  |     | 2,113,502  |  
|Interest income                                 |  |             | 46,210     |   |         |     | 14,078    |                |  |     | 10,486           |   |  |            | 19,445    |   |       |     | 5,002     |               |  |     | 2,942          |   |  |              | 11,475    |   |       |     | 20,778     |   |  |     | (8,338      | ) |  |     | 122,078    |  
|Interest expense                                |  |             | (37,735    | ) |         |     | (4,681    | )              |  |     | (27,877          | ) |  |            | (28,914   | ) |       |     | (10,582   | )             |  |     | (9,426         | ) |  |              | (6,825    | ) |       |     | (3,616     | ) |  |     | 8,338       |   |  |     | (121,319   | )
|Depreciation and amortization for the year      |  |             | (240,538   | ) |         |     | (130,316  | )              |  |     | (118,503         | ) |  |            | (115,364  | ) |       |     | (43,365   | )             |  |     | (38,834        | ) |  |              | (127,124  | ) |       |     | (13,166    | ) |  |     |            |   |  |     | (827,230   | )
|Income before income taxes                      |  |             | 916,408    |   |         |     | 249,026   |                |  |     | 280,518          |   |  |            | 469,268   |   |       |     | 62,753    |               |  |     | 67,478         |   |  |              | 16,755    |   |       |     | 1,666,151  |   |  |     | (1,628,878  | ) |  |     | 2,099,479  |  
|Income tax expense                              |  |             | (185,786   | ) |         |     | 14,670    |                |  |     | (46,087          | ) |  |            | (109,928  | ) |       |     | (3,654    | )             |  |     | (7,289         | ) |  |              | 21,640    |   |       |     | (11,015    | ) |  |     |            |   |  |     | (327,449   | )
|Total assets                                    |  |             | 7,750,131  |   |         |     | 4,504,800 |                |  |     | 3,442,872        |   |  |            | 3,347,978 |   |       |     | 1,257,242 |               |  |     | 1,130,931      |   |  |              | 3,098,119 |   |       |     | 26,197,628 |   |  |     | (26,196,064 | ) |  |     | 24,533,637 |  
|Total liabilities                               |  |             | 851,150    |   |         |     | 184,279   |                |  |     | 613,245          |   |  |            | 937,604   |   |       |     | 178,225   |               |  |     | 225,222        |   |  |              | 187,230   |   |       |     | 195,808    |   |  |     | (292,339    | ) |  |     | 3,080,424  |  
|Net cash flows provided by operating activities |  |             | 1,100,076  |   |         |     | 307,055   |                |  |     | 409,182          |   |  |            | 478,485   |   |       |     | 117,880   |               |  |     | 115,995        |   |  |              | 154,435   |   |       |     | (21,834    | ) |  |     |            |   |  |     | 2,661,274  |  
|Net cash flows used in investing activities     |  |             | (198,026   | ) |         |     | (80,975   | )              |  |     | (148,564         | ) |  |            | (389,677  | ) |       |     | (31,179   | )             |  |     | (39,711        | ) |  |              | (86,639   | ) |       |     | 1,735,986  |   |  |     | (1,745,000  | ) |  |     | (983,785   | )
|Net cash flows used in financing activities     |  |             | (826,782   | ) |         |     | (186,000  | )              |  |     | (295,954         | ) |  |            | (399,027  | ) |       |     | (122,526  | )             |  |     | (48,537        | ) |  |              | (14,993   | ) |       |     | (1,999,997 | ) |  |     | 1,745,000   |   |  |     | (2,148,816 | )
|Investment in productive assets                 |  |             | 5,376,838  |   |         |     | 3,111,862 |                |  |     | 2,629,621        |   |  |            | 2,747,448 |   |       |     | 904,336   |               |  |     | 816,969        |   |  |              | 2,265,345 |   |       |     | 66,409     |   |  |     | (69         | ) |  |     | 17,918,759 |  



F-54



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                |  |             |           |   |         |     |           |                |  |     |                  |   |  |            |           |   |       |     |         |               |  |     |                |   |  |              |           |   |       |     |            |   |  |     |            |   |  |     |            |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- | --------- | - | ------- | --- | --------- | -------------- |  | --- | ---------------- | - |  | ---------- | --------- | - | ----- | --- | ------- | ------------- |  | --- | -------------- | - |  | ------------ | --------- | - | ----- | --- | ---------- | - |  | --- | ---------- | - |  | --- | ---------- | -
|                                                |  |             |           |   |         |     |           |                |  |    
|December 31, 2011                               |  | Guadalajara |           |   | Tijuana |     |           | PuertoVallarta |  |     | San Jose delCabo |   |  | Hermosillo |           |   | Bajio |     |         | OtherAirports |  |     | OtherCompanies |   |  | Eliminations |           |   | Total |    
|Total external revenues                         |  | Ps.         | 1,618,135 |   |         | Ps. | 686,558   |                |  | Ps. | 773,401          |   |  | Ps.        | 1,042,676 |   |       | Ps. | 209,746 |               |  | Ps. | 210,738        |   |  | Ps.          | 397,480   |   |       | Ps. |           |   |  | Ps. |           |   |  | Ps. | 4,938,734  |  
|Total Intersegment revenues                     |  |             |          |   |         |     |          |                |  |     |                 |   |  |            |          |   |       |     |        |               |  |     |               |   |  |              |          |   |       |     | 1,791,421  |   |  |     | (1,791,421 | ) |  |     |           |  
|Income from operations                          |  |             | 847,070   |   |         |     | 212,065   |                |  |     | 275,995          |   |  |            | 405,197   |   |       |     | 63,229  |               |  |     | 58,212         |   |  |              | (3,412    | ) |       |     | 1,482,064  |   |  |     | (1,504,401 | ) |  |     | 1,836,020  |  
|Interest income                                 |  |             | 58,353    |   |         |     | 9,394     |                |  |     | 10,001           |   |  |            | 5,731     |   |       |     | 5,149   |               |  |     | 3,597          |   |  |              | 9,519     |   |       |     | 20,361     |   |  |     | (13,651    | ) |  |     | 108,445    |  
|Interest expense                                |  |             | (28,092   | ) |         |     | (3,538    | )              |  |     | (19,699          | ) |  |            | (21,237   | ) |       |     | (8,176  | )             |  |     | (9,063         | ) |  |              | (12,621   | ) |       |     | (4,989     | ) |  |     | 13,661     |   |  |     | (93,753    | )
|Depreciation and amortization for the year      |  |             | (210,170  | ) |         |     | (117,078  | )              |  |     | (111,430         | ) |  |            | (93,048   | ) |       |     | (38,453 | )             |  |     | (37,153        | ) |  |              | (123,059  | ) |       |     | (12,580    | ) |  |     |           |   |  |     | (742,969   | )
|Income before income taxes                      |  |             | 890,333   |   |         |     | 216,527   |                |  |     | 267,329          |   |  |            | 403,565   |   |       |     | 60,224  |               |  |     | 52,825         |   |  |              | (6,465    | ) |       |     | 1,493,401  |   |  |     | (1,504,401 | ) |  |     | 1,873,338  |  
|Income tax expense                              |  |             | (152,564  | ) |         |     | (7,579    | )              |  |     | (36,696          | ) |  |            | (91,688   | ) |       |     | (272    | )             |  |     | (3,349         | ) |  |              | 30,960    |   |       |     | (570       | ) |  |     |           |   |  |     | (261,758   | )
|Net cash flows provided by operating activities |  |             | 905,785   |   |         |     | 318,869   |                |  |     | 321,621          |   |  |            | 388,521   |   |       |     | 99,887  |               |  |     | 88,904         |   |  |              | 161,074   |   |       |     | (27,942    | ) |  |     |           |   |  |     | 2,256,718  |  
|Net cash flows used in investing activities     |  |             | (222,180  | ) |         |     | (224,915  | )              |  |     | (244,637         | ) |  |            | (356,395  | ) |       |     | (48,045 | )             |  |     | (58,371        | ) |  |              | (88,656   | ) |       |     | 1,729,747  |   |  |     | (1,740,018 | ) |  |     | (1,253,470 | )
|Net cash flows used in financing activities     |  |             | (673,037  | ) |         |     | (275,000  | )              |  |     | (124,760         | ) |  |            | 17,962    |   |       |     | (33,672 | )             |  |     | (53,927        | ) |  |              | (2,000    | ) |       |     | (1,812,628 | ) |  |     | 1,740,018  |   |  |     | (1,217,045 | )
|Investment in productive assets                 |  |             | 5,448,454 |   |         |     | 3,164,531 |                |  |     | 2,628,638        |   |  |            | 2,522,912 |   |       |     | 923,943 |               |  |     | 805,379        |   |  |              | 2,303,924 |   |       |     | 57,905     |   |  |     | (69        | ) |  |     | 17,855,617 |  

Productive assets are comprised of Machinery, equipment, Improvements to leased buildings, Improvements to concession assets,
Airport concessions, Rights of use of airport facilities, Other acquired rights and Other assets.



| |  |  | Geographic informationAll business units of the Company are operating in Mexico. The financial information presented above shows the different regions where these business units operate.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Principal CustomersThe Company has no dependence on a particularly client, as 58.8%, 57.1% and 51.8% of the total revenues for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, corresponds to the passenger charges that are paid
for by passengers upon use of the Companys airport facilities, that is collected by the airlines to be subsequently reimbursed to the airports, and are covered by the airlines through guarantees issued in favor of the airports. Without the
revenues from passenger charges that airlines collect on behalf of the Company, no one client represents more than 10.0% of the consolidated revenues.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Principal suppliersThe Company has no dependence of particularly supplier, due to, no one supplier represents more than 10.0% of its capital investments in productive assets and/or of the total operating costs.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|28. | Foreign currency transactions
|--- | -----------------------------



| | a. | Transactions denominated in foreign currency for the years ended at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          |  |                                |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ------ |  | ---- |  | ------ | ---- |  |  | ------ | 
|                                                          |  | 2013                           |        |  | 2012 |  |        | 2011 | 
|                                                          |  | (In thousands of U.S. dollars) |       
|Revenues from aeronautical and non-
aeronautical services |  |                                | 29,461 |  |      |  | 26,870 |      |  |  | 22,572 | 
|                                                          |  |                                |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        | 
|Revenues for recovery expenses                            |  |                                |       |  |      |  | 175    |      |  |  | 626    | 
|                                                          |  |                                |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        | 
|Technical assistance fee                                  |  |                                | 5,457  |  |      |  | 5,364  |      |  |  | 5,209  | 
|                                                          |  |                                |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        | 
|Other expenses                                            |  |                                | 5,159  |  |      |  | 4,040  |      |  |  | 5,621  | 
|                                                          |  |                                |        |  |      |  |        |      |  |  |        | 



| | b. | The exchange rates in effect at the dates of the consolidated balance sheets and the date of the related report of the independent auditors were as follows:
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             |  |              |         |  |              |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------- |  | ------------ | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                                             |  | December 31, |         |  | February 26, |    
|                                             |  | 2013         |         |  | 2012         |     |         | 2014 | 
|Mexican pesos per one U.S. dollar (Note 3.o) |  | Ps.          | 13.0765 |  |              | Ps. | 13.0101 |      |  | Ps. | 13.2090 | 
|                                             |  |              |         |  |              |     |         |      |  |     |         | 



| | c. | For the year ended December 31, the foreign currency exchange gains and losses was as follows:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    |  |      |         |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | --- | -------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | -
|                                    |  | 2013 |         |   | 2012 |     |          | 2011 | 
|Foreign exchange gains              |  | Ps.  | 76,569  |   |      | Ps. | 49,528   |      |  | Ps. | 83,984  |  
|Foreign exchange loss               |  |      | (72,806 | ) |      |     | (64,310  | )    |  |     | (61,358 | )
|                                    |  |      |         |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  
|Foreign exchange gains (loss)  net |  | Ps.  | 3,763   |   |      | Ps. | (14,782) |      |  | Ps. | 22,626  |  
|                                    |  |      |         |   |      |     |          |      |  |     |         |  



|29. | Transactions with related parties
|--- | ---------------------------------

According to the definitions of control established
in IFRS, the Company does not have a company controlling its operations, however, and according to these definitions, AMP represents an entity with significant influence over the operation of the Company, as it has representation on the Board of
Directors, participates in the policy-making processes, maintains material transactions, appoints officers and provides essential technical information, but without exercising control over the Company, no other Stockholder fulfills this definition.



F-55



---

##### Table of Contents

Transactions with related parties, carried out in the ordinary course of business, were entered
into at prices comparable to those for transactions with independent parties and were as follows:



|                                                 |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- |  | ---- | --- | ------- | ---- |  | --- | ------- | 
|                                                 |  | 2013 |         |  | 2012 |     |         | 2011 | 
|AMP, entity with significant influence Expenses: |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|Technical assistance fees                        |  | Ps.  | 171,470 |  |      | Ps. | 155,072 |      |  | Ps. | 136,191 | 
|                                                 |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 
|Services received                                |  | Ps.  | 1,496   |  |      | Ps. | 1,315   |      |  | Ps. | 245     | 
|                                                 |  |      |         |  |      |     |         |      |  |     |         | 

In 1999, GAP and AMP entered into a technical assistance and transfer-of-technology agreement whereby AMP and
its stockholders agreed to render administrative and advisory services and transfer industry technology and know-how to GAP in exchange for consideration. The agreements original 15-year term may be automatically renewed for successive
five-year terms, with the approval of the stockholders, unless one party gives a termination notice to the other at least 60 days prior to the effective termination date. Only the Stockholders Meeting has the authority to decide the
non-renewal or deny the renewal of the agreement. If GAP decides to cancel or renew the agreement, GAP needs the approval of at least 51% of the holders of Series B shares other than AMP or any party related to AMP, accordingly to the participation
agreement signed on August 25, 1999 among the SCT, GAP, its strategic partner and the Stockholders of the strategic partner.

According to the agreement, as of January 1, 2000, the Company committed to pay AMP annual consideration of U.S. 7,000,000 for the years
2000 and 2001 and, beginning in 2002, the greater of U.S. 4,000,000 (these amounts are subject to adjustment based on the CPI) or 5% of GAPs consolidated operating income, defined as earnings before interest income or expense, calculated prior
to deducting the technical assistance fee, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.

AMP is also entitled to the refund of expenses
incurred in the rendering of services provided for in the agreement.

The total amounts paid to executive officers for the years ended at
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:



|              |  |      |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     |        | 
|------------- |  | ---- | ------ |  | ---- | --- | ------ | ---- |  | --- | ------ | 
|              |  | 2013 |        |  | 2012 |     |        | 2011 | 
|Benefits paid |  | Ps.  | 28,890 |  |      | Ps. | 22,907 |      |  | Ps. | 20,228 | 
|              |  |      |        |  |      |     |        |      |  |     |        | 



|30. | Operating lease agreements
|--- | --------------------------

Leasing as the lessee The rents of
operating leases are payable as follows:



|                        |  |      |        |  |      |     |        | 
|----------------------- |  | ---- | ------ |  | ---- | --- | ------ | 
|                        |  | 2013 |        |  | 2012 |    
|Less than one year      |  | Ps.  | 8,990  |  |      | Ps. | 7,474  | 
|Between one and 5 years |  |      | 24,346 |  |      |     | 25,496 | 
|                        |  |      |        |  |      |     |        | 
|                        |  | Ps.  | 33,336 |  |      | Ps. | 32,970 | 
|                        |  |      |        |  |      |     |        | 

As described in Note 25, the Company has leased office space under one five-year operating lease agreement,
which was renewed in February 2008 and concluded in January 2013. The monthly rental payments of U.S.$33,617. Base rent is subject to increases according to the NCPI and the CPI.

In addition to the monthly rent described above, the Company has entered into contracts for other rent from other assets, the amounts of which
are not material.



F-56



---

##### Table of Contents

Leasing as the lessor The Company receives payments from leasing of spaces
inside the commercial area of the airports, which have been classified as operating leases. The future minimum lease payments associated with such leases is as follows:



|                        |  |      |           |  |      |     |           | 
|----------------------- |  | ---- | --------- |  | ---- | --- | --------- | 
|                        |  | 2013 |           |  | 2012 |    
|Less than one year      |  | Ps.  | 568,183   |  |      | Ps. | 488,298   | 
|Between one and 5 years |  |      | 1,080,748 |  |      |     | 1,084,908 | 
|More than 5 years       |  |      | 105,428   |  |      |     | 263,423   | 
|                        |  |      |           |  |      |     |           | 
|                        |  | Ps.  | 1,754,359 |  |      | Ps. | 1,836,629 | 
|                        |  |      |           |  |      |     |           | 

During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized income from leasing
activities of Ps. 743,327, Ps. 641,971 and Ps. 522,051, in the consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, respectively.

Future minimum rentals do not include the contingent rentals that may be paid under certain commercial leases on the basis of a percentage of
the lessees monthly revenues in excess of the monthly minimum guaranteed rent. Contingent rentals for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are disclosed under the caption Revenues from sharing of commercial
activities in Note 19.



|31. | New accounting principles not yet in effect
|--- | -------------------------------------------

The following IFRS new and/or revised have
been issued but are not yet effective, spite of it can be early adopted, the Company has not adopted any of these standards as of the issuance date of these consolidated financial statements.



|                                                                                                |  |                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Standard                                                                                        |  | Effective as of
|Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27 Investment Entities                                  |  | January 1, 2014
|Amendments to IAS 32  Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities                    |  | January 1, 2014
|IFRIC 21  Levies                                                                               |  | January 1, 2014
|IFRS 9  Financial Instruments                                                                  |  | January 1, 2017
|Amendments to IFRS 9 and IFRS 7  Mandatory Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition Disclosures |  | January 1, 2016

Amendments to IFRS 10, IFRS 12 and IAS 27  Investment Entities

The amendments to IFRS 10 define an investment entity and require a reporting entity that meets the definition of an investment entity not to
consolidate its subsidiaries but instead to measure its subsidiaries at fair value through profit or loss in its consolidated and separate financial statements.

To qualify as an investment entity, a reporting entity is required to:



| |  |  | Obtain funds from one or more investors for the purpose of providing them with professional investment management services.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Commit to its investor(s) that its business purpose is to invest funds solely for returns from capital appreciation, investment income, or both.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Measure and evaluate performance of substantially all of its investments on a fair value basis.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Management does not anticipate that the investment entities amendments will have any effect on the consolidated financial statements as the
Company is not an investment entity.

Amendments to IAS 32  Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

The amendments to IAS 32 clarify the requirements relating to the offset of financial assets and financial liabilities. Specifically, the
amendments clarify the meaning of currently has a legally enforceable right of set-off and simultaneous realization and settlement.

The Company management does not anticipate that these amendments will have any effect on the its consolidated financial statements.



F-57



---

##### Table of Contents

IFRIC 21Levies

IFRIC 21, provides guidance on when to recognize a liability for a levy imposed by a government, both for levies that are accounted for in
accordance with IAS 37Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and those where the timing and amount of the levy is certain. The Interpretation covers the accounting for outflows imposed on entities by governments (including
government agencies and similar bodies) in accordance with laws and/or regulations. However, it does not include income taxes (see IAS 12Income Taxes), fines and other penalties, liabilities arising from emissions trading schemes and
outflows within the scope of other Standards.

IFRIC 21 identifies the obligating event for the recognition of a liability as the activity
that triggers the payment of the levy in accordance with the relevant legislation. The Interpretation clarifies that economic compulsion and the going concern principle do not create or imply that an obligating event has occurred.

IFRIC 21 provides the following guidance on recognition of a liability to pay levies:



| |  |  | The liability is recognized progressively if the obligating event occurs over a period of time
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | If an obligation is triggered on reaching a minimum threshold, the liability is recognized when that
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company has not fully assessed the effects of adopting this new standard on its
consolidated financial information.

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments

IFRS 9, issued in November 2009, introduced new requirements for the classification and measurement of financial assets. IFRS 9 was amended in
October 2010 to include requirements for the classification and measurement of financial liabilities and for derecognition.

Key
requirements of IFRS 9:



| |  |  | All recognized financial assets that are within the scope of IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are required to be subsequently measured at amortized cost or fair value. Specifically, debt
investments that are held within a business model whose objective is to collect the contractual cash flows, and that have contractual cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding are generally measured
at amortized cost at the end of subsequent accounting periods. All other debt investments and equity investments are measured at their fair value at the end of subsequent accounting periods. In addition, under IFRS 9, entities may make an
irrevocable election to present subsequent changes in the fair value of an equity investment (that is not held for trading) in other profit or loss and other comprehensive income, with only dividend income generally recognized in profit or loss of
the year.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | With regard to the measurement of financial liabilities designated as of fair value through profit or loss, IFRS 9 requires that the amount of change in the fair value of the financial liability that is attributable to
changes in the credit risk of that liability is presented in other profit or loss and other comprehensive income, unless the recognition of the effects of changes in the liabilitys credit risk in other profit or loss and other comprehensive
income would create or enlarge an accounting mismatch in profit or loss. Changes in fair value attributable to a financial liabilitys credit risk are not subsequently reclassified to profit or loss. Under IAS 39, the entire amount of the
change in the fair value of the financial liability designated as fair value through profit or loss is presented in profit or loss.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Company has not fully assessed the effects of adopting this new standard and related
amendments on its consolidated financial information.



F-58



---

##### Table of Contents

|32. | Subsequent events
|--- | -----------------



| |  |  | On January 24, 2014, the Company utilized Ps. 74,381 of the available line of credit with BBVA Bancomer for the Guadalajara and Puerto Vallarta airports, which corresponds to the agreement described in Note 16.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On February 4, 2014, the Company made the last payment corresponding to the second disbursement of the loan signed with Banamex on December 9, 2009, that is described in Note 16. The payment amount was Ps.
108,791, thus, with the payment the disbursement was paid in full.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | On February 4, 2014, the Company made the last payment corresponding to the second disbursement of the loan signed with HSBC on December 10, 2009, that is described in Note 16. The payment amount was Ps.
108,791, thus, with the payment the disbursement was paid in full.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|33. | Financial statements issuance authorization
|--- | -------------------------------------------

On February 26, 2014 the issuance of
these consolidated financial statements was authorized by Fernando Bosque Mohino, Chief Executive Officer and Raúl Revuelta Musalem, Chief Financial Officer. These consolidated financial statements are subject to approval at the ordinary
general stockholders meeting, where they may be modified based on provision set forth by the Mexican General Corporate Law.

* * * *
* *



F-59