alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Spain (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,117   | 5,918   | 0       | 0       | 0      | 0      | 2,930  | 29,329 | 10,310 | 166,684
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 199,966 | 215,062 | 426,657 | 269,504 |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID JERRIAL HENDERSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

TERRI GONZALEZ, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-56933

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-06971-SJOMAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2015

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, WATFORD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner David Henderson appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his untimely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Henderson contends

he was entitled to equitable tolling due to his mental impairment. We have

FILED

FEB 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm the district court’s

decision. 

The dismissal of a habeas petition as time-barred is reviewed de novo. Bills

v. Clark, 628 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2010). Henderson’s claim fails because he

did not show that his impairment was an “extraordinary circumstance” that made it 

impossible to meet the filing deadline. See id. at 1099-1100. The evidence

“refute[s] a claim of impairment so debilitating” as to be the but-for cause of

Henderson’s delay. Yow Ming Yeh v. Martel, 751 F.3d 1075, 1078 (9th Cir.)

(mental impairment was not “so severe” where petitioner “repeatedly sought

administrative and judicial remedies, and . . . showed an awareness of basic legal

concepts”), cert. denied sub nom. Yow Ming Yeh v. Biter, 135 S. Ct. 486 (2014). 

Henderson’s mental impairment was not comparable to the severity of impairment

described in Forbess v. Franke, 749 F.3d 837, 840-41 (9th Cir. 2014).1

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to hold an

evidentiary hearing. See Roberts v. Marshall, 627 F.3d 768, 772-73 (9th Cir.

2010). Henderson failed to plead specific facts in the district court that, if true,

1

 We grant the government’s December 16, 2013 request for judicial notice

of excerpts of the reporter’s transcript. See Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1225

(9th Cir. 2007).

2 11-56933
would entitle him to equitable tolling, and he did not, before this court, identify any

new evidence that could be presented at an evidentiary hearing that would warrant

tolling. 

AFFIRMED. 

3 11-56933
No. 12-6834.

#### Ariegwe *v.*Kirkegard, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on

the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 95-60321

Summary Calendar

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ROGER O. DYESS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:94-CR12PS-1)

_________________________

November 24, 1995

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger O. Dyess argues that the district court abused its

discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial based on the

admission of extrinsic evidence of other crimes or bad acts

allegedly committed by Dyess. We have reviewed the record,

including the transcripts of the trial, and find no reversible

error.
2

AFFIRMED.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 27085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12937]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 8, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., Georgetown, Kentucky; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Boone County Bank, Inc., 
Madison, West Virginia (in organization), a de novo bank.
    2. Premier Financial Bancorp, Inc., Georgetown, Kentucky; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of The Bank of Philippi, Inc., 
Philippi, West Virginia (in organization), a de novo bank.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Karen L. Grandstrand, Vice 
President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, P.O. Box 291, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. N.A. Corporation, Roseville, Minnesota; to become a bank holding 
company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of North American 
Banking Company, Roseville, Minnesota, a de novo bank.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Sterling Bancshares, Inc., Houston, Texas; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Humble National Bank, Humble, Texas. 
Comments regarding this application must be received not later than 
June 3, 1998.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 11, 1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-12937 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```
#### Andre GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4709

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
No. 12M56.

No. 12M57.

No. 12M58.

#### Comeaux *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division; Aldape *v.*Scribner, Warden; and Apollo *v.*Dickinson, Warden.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 21, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00255

- CR

Damon Boyd , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONE S

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ a rgum ents, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appellant is in digent and u nable to pa y costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### Ishmel R. SASSER, DC# R38917, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3419

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.
No. 12-48.

#### Three-Dimensional Media Group, Ltd. *v.*Kappos, Director, Patent and Trademark Office.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|North Dakota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|North Dakota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 3      | 8      | 8      | 12     | 15     | 41     | 40     | 49    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 54     | 67     | 68     | 83     | 93     | 3      | 1      | 1      | 1      |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 0      |        | 1      | 1      |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
S. 1508

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To amend the definition of a rural community for eligibility for economic recovery

funds, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

2374(3) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of

1990 (7 U.S.C. 6612(3)) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(3) The term ‘rural community’ means—

‘‘(A) any town, township, municipality, or other similar

unit of general purpose local government, or any area represented by a not-for-profit corporation or institution organized under State or Federal law to promote broad based

economic development, or unit of general purpose local

government, as approved by the Secretary, that has a population of not more than 10,000 individuals, is located within

a county in which at least 15 percent of the total primary

and secondary labor and proprietor income is derived from

forestry, wood products, and forest-related industries such

as recreation, forage production, and tourism and that is

located within the boundary, or within 100 miles of the

boundary, of a national forest; or

‘‘(B) any county that is not contained within a Metropolitan Statistical Area as defined by the United States

Office of Management and Budget, in which at least 15

percent of the total primary and secondary labor and

proprietor income is derived from forestry, wood products,

and forest-related industries such as recreation, forage

production, and tourism and that is located within the

18:15 Oct 07, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\S1508.ENR bend06
S. 1508—2

boundary, or within 100 miles of the boundary, of a national

forest.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.

18:15 Oct 07, 1993 VerDate 01-JUL-93 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6655 Sfmt 6501 E:\BILLS\S1508.ENR bend06
No. 12-6815.

#### Scott *v.*Illinois.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Cameron, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Brazil (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 22,791 | 31,256 | 20,617 | 3,034  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|California Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|California Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 283,796 | 296,096
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 311,096 | 335,396 | 349,296 | 364,296 | 364,296 | 365,496 | 361,256 | 363,056 | 373,236 | 373,966
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 373,966 | 322,868 | 322,868 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      Of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Ralph F. Hake, the Chief Executive Officer of Maytag Corporation, certify
that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in the foregoing report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Maytag Corporation.


                                        /s/ Ralph F. Hake
                                        -----------------
                                        Ralph F. Hake, Chief Executive Officer

                                        August 9, 2002
                                        --------------
                                        Date

                                       25