alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Deutsche Alt-B Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
     2006-AB1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer,
     GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as Servicer and PHH Mortgage
     Corporation, as Servicer.

     Dated:    May 28, 2008

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                         
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Maine Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      
|                                                                                                      
|Price of Maine Natural Gas Exports (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet) (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 5.62  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.53   | 4.46   | 4.30   | 8.43   | 6.68   | 3.27   | 3.14   | 4.84   | 5.54   | 3.58  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.61   | 5.01   | 8.78   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Portal, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Portal, ND Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 2      | 2      | 5      | 5      | 25    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1834

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Bradley Kielian, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: August 7, 2000

Filed: August 10, 2000

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Bradley Kielian appealed his drug-related sentence, counsel filed a brief

and moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's

brief raises several arguments about Kielian's sentence. Having reviewed the record

and counsel's Anders brief, we reject Kielian's arguments and affirm.

First, Kielian argues the district court committed error in fixing the drug quantity

attributable to him. We review only for plain error because Kielian did not raise the

drug-quantity issue below, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b); United States v. Montanye, 996
-2-

F.2d 190, 192 (8th Cir. 1993) (en banc), and we conclude the unchallenged information

in the presentence report (PSR) amply supports the district court's finding, see United

States v. Beatty, 9 F.3d 686, 689 (8th Cir. 1993) (district court is permitted to accept

as true all factual assertions not specifically objected to by parties). Second, Kielian

challenges the imposition of a 2-level firearm enhancement. Again reviewing only for

plain error, we conclude the district court properly assessed the enhancement.

Although Kielian argues his fingerprints were not found on the gun, his constructive

possession of the gun is sufficient to support the enhancement. The gun was found in

Kielian's house, locked inside a safe containing other material with his fingerprints. See

United States v. Hayes, 15 F.3d 125, 127 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1225

(1994). Finally, Kielian argues the PSR contains erroneous information about his

discharge from the military, and he complains the district court did not specify on the

judgment and commitment whether Kielian is to go through a drug-treatment program

in prison. Kielian's arguments fail because he neither objected to the allegedly

erroneous information nor sought placement in a prison drug-treatment program.

Having satisfied ourselves that there are no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal,

see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we affirm the judgment of the district court,

grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and deny Kielian's request for appointment of new

counsel.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
13**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Frank Godino, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mills Music Trust;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; *4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for theregistrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

14c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and        Date: August  10, 2010 /s/ Frank Godino   Frank Godino   Trust officer of The Corporate Trustee    * The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash transactions and do notinclude transactions that would be recorded in financial statements presented on the accrual basisof accounting. The Trust is required to distribute all funds received. Accordingly, the Trust hasnot prepared any statements of financial condition or cash flows.
No. 12-6067.

#### Clark *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 04a0126n.06

Filed: November 24, 2004

Case No. 02-2091

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

NANCY LOUISE ABERNATHY, )

)

Petitioner-Appellant, )

) ON APPEAL FROM THE

v. ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT

) COURT FOR THE WESTERN

JOAN YUKINS, Warden, ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

)

Respondent-Appellee. )

)

__________________________________________

BEFORE: SUHRHEINRICH, BATCHELDER, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Nancy Louise Abernathy (“Abernathy”)

appeals the district court’s denial of her petition for habeas review. Specifically, Abernathy alleges

that the district court unreasonably applied Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052

(1984), in finding that her trial attorney was not constitutionally ineffective for asserting

simultaneous defenses of innocence and insanity to the charge that she murdered her daughter-inlaw. Additionally, Abernathy argues that because the district court denied Abernathy’s request to

hold an evidentiary hearing, the record is insufficient for this Court to determine whether the district

court unreasonably applied Strickland.

A court may decide an ineffective assistance of counsel claim on a trial record “when the

record is adequate to assess the merits of the defendant’s allegations.” United States v. Hill, 142 F.

3d 305, 308 (6th Cir. 1998). We find that the district court did not err in ruling on the habeas
2

petition without holding an evidentiary hearing because the record was sufficiently developed, as

reflected in the district court’s opinion. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the

parties’ briefs, and counsels’ arguments, we are convinced that the district court did not err in its

conclusions. As the district court’s opinion, which incorporates the Magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, carefully and correctly sets out the law governing the issues raised, and clearly

articulates the reasons underlying its decision, issuance of a full written opinion by this court would

serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we

AFFIRM.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1018 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1018

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2011

Mr. Nunes (for himself and Mr. Crowley) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
               deduction for mortgage insurance premiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE INSURANCE PREMIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 163(h)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts paid or accrued after December 31, 2011, and to amounts 
properly allocable to periods after such date.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph
C. Visconti, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report
on Form 10-K of ValueRich, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of ValueRich, Inc.





Dated:
      March
      31, 2009
              By:
              /s/  
      Joseph C.
      ViscontiJoseph
      C. ViscontiChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVISORY
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVISORY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated December 20, 2011,
by and between BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT I, INC., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and BEHRINGER
HARVARD OPPORTUNITY ADVISORS I, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (the “Advisor”), as successor in interest
to Behringer Harvard Opportunity Advisors I LP, a Texas limited partnership.


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Advisor previously entered into that certain Second Amended and Restated Advisory Management Agreement dated May 13, 2011
(the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 6.06 of the Agreement, the Company and the Advisor desire to amend the Agreement to reduce the asset management fee payable
to the Advisor under the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, do hereby
agree as follows:


 


1.Defined Terms.
Any term used herein that is not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such term as provided in the Agreement.


 


2.Amendment
to Article III. Effective January 1, 2012, Article III, Section 3.01(a) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:


 


(a)               
Asset Management Fee. The Company shall pay the Advisor a monthly Asset Management
Fee in an amount equal to 1/12th of 0.60% of Aggregate Asset Value as of the last day of the month, payable on the 15th
day of following month. 


 


3.Continuing
Effect. Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
and shall not be deemed to have otherwise been amended, modified, revised or altered.


 


4.Counterparts.
The parties agree that this Amendment has been or may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,
and all counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.


 






    	 



    	 	



    
 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY REIT I, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Terry L. Gage
	 	 	Terry L. Gage
	 	 	Its Authorized Representative
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	BEHRINGER HARVARD OPPORTUNITY ADVISORS I, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	Harvard Property Trust, LLC,
 its Manager
	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ Robert S. Aisner
	 	 	 	Robert S. Aisner
	 	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                            
|                                                                                                         
|Northeast Gateway Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Trinidad and Tobago (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         
|                                                                                                         
|Northeast Gateway Natural Gas Liquefied Natural Gas Imports from Trinidad and Tobago (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 921    | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,009  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 2,610  | 2,338  | 0      | 0      | 2,269 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 2,840  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024