T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E S L I E WYN B OWDE N, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. C H R I S T I N E O . G R E G O I R E ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 10- 35253 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 5 5 1 6 - F DB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on F r ankl i n D . B ur ge s s , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L e s l i e W yn B ow de n, aW a s hi ngt on s t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d i stri ctco u rt ’ s j u d g m en td i sm i ssi n g h i s ci v i lri g h t s act i o n fo r fai l u re t o ex h au st a d mi n i s tr a t i v e r e me d i e s u n d e rth e Pr i s o n Li t i g a t i o n Re f o rm A c t , 4 2 U . S. C. § 1997e ( a ) . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the 

# FI LED JU N 08 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 35253 2 d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to e x h au s t, W

y att v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1108, 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dw e a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed B ow den’ s a ct i on because B ow den f a ile dto e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it. See 4 2 U . S. C. § 1 9 9 7 e ( a ) ( “N o a c tio n s h a ll b e b r o u g h t w ith r e s p e c t to p r is o n c o n d itio n s . . . u n til s u c h a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s a s ar e av a ilab le ar e e x h au s te d .” ) ; W oodf ord v . N go , 54 8 U . S . 81 , 85 , 93 -95 (20 06 ) ( “ prop erexhaust i on ” i s m andat ory andre qu i re s a dh e r e n c e to a d m in is tr a tiv e p r o c e du r a l ru le s ) ; s e e a ls o W y a tt , 3 1 5 F .3 dat 1 1 2 0 (“A pri soner’ s c on ce ss i on t o n on exhaust i on i s aval i d g roun d for di sm i ss al. . . . ”) . W e c o n s tru e th e d is m is s a l o f B o w d e n ’s c la im s to b e w ith o u t p r e ju d ic e . See W y a tt , 31 5 F . 3dat11 20 (di sm i ss al s f or fa i l ure t o exh austadm i ni strat i ve re m edi es ar e w i tho utprej ud i ce ). B ow den’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. W e d o n o t c o n s id e rc la im s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See J an es v. W al-M art Stores Inc. , 2 7 9 F . 3 d8 8 3 , 8 8 7 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ) (“ Issu es rai sedfo r th e fi rst t i m e on app ea lusual l y are no tconsi dere d. ”) . B ow den’ s m ot i on s f

or ac ce pt ance of hi s s up pl em ent alre pl y bri ef ar e gr ant e d, and w e i ns truc tthe c l e rk t o f i l e the s uppl e m e nt a lr e pl ybr i e f r e c e i ve d on O ct o b er 5 , 2 0 1 0 . B o w d en ’ s m o t i o n fi l edo n N o v em b er 5 , 2 0 1 0 i s co n stru edas a10- 35253 3 ci t at i on of supp l em ent alautho ri t i es . B ow den’ s r em ai ni ng pend i ng m ot i on s are de ni e d. A F F I R M E D .