alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1402

To convey a certain parcel of public land to the county of Twin Falls,

Idaho, for use as a landfill, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. CRAIG (for himself and Mr. KEMPTHORNE) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To convey a certain parcel of public land to the county

of Twin Falls, Idaho, for use as a landfill, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Twin Falls County

5 Landfill Act of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the provisions of this

8 Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey all right,

9 title, and interest of the United States in the lands located
2

•S 1402 IS

1 in Twin Falls County, Idaho, as described in subsection

2 (d) for use as a public landfill, to the County of Twin Falls

3 in exchange for payment of fair market value for the land

4 by the grantee to the Secretary of the Interior.

5 (b) RESERVATION OF MINERAL RIGHTS.—The Sec6 retary shall include in any deed or other instrument of

7 conveyance conveying the land pursuant to subsection (a),

8 a reservation to the United States of—

9 (1) all mineral rights underlying the lands con10 veyed under subsection (a); and

11 (2) the right to enter the land conveyed under

12 subsection (a) for the purpose of removing minerals,

13 in accordance with applicable mining laws.

14 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), if

16 the lands conveyed pursuant to subsection (a) are

17 not used for the establishment or operation of a

18 landfill within 12 months after the date on which

19 the conveyance is made, all right, title, and interest

20 in such land shall revert to the United States on the

21 day following the end of such 12-month period.

22 (2) EXCEPTION.—No reversion shall be effec23 tive under paragraph (1) if the lands conveyed pur24 suant to subsection (a) are contaminated with a haz25 ardous substance (as defined in section 101(14) of
3

•S 1402 IS

1 the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com2 pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.

3 9601(14))) on the date on which the reversion would

4 otherwise take effect.

5 (d) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The lands to be con6 veyed pursuant to section 2 of this Act comprise approxi7 mately 1083.77 acres of Federal lands described as the

SE1⁄4SW1⁄4SE1⁄4, S1⁄2SE1⁄4SE1⁄4 of section 31; W1 8 ⁄2,

SW1⁄4SW1⁄4SE1 9 ⁄4 of section 32; Township 11 South,

10 Range 17 East, Boise Meridian and the West Half of Lot

2, Lot 3, Lot 4, W1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, S1⁄2NW1⁄4, SW1 11 ⁄4 and

the W1⁄2W1⁄2SE1 12 ⁄4 of section 5; Lot 1, East Half of Lot

2, E1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4, SE1⁄4NE1⁄4, E1⁄2W1⁄2SE1 13 ⁄4, and the

E1⁄2SE1⁄4 of section 6; N1⁄2NE1⁄4NE1⁄4, NE1⁄4NW1⁄4NE1 14 ⁄4

of section 7; NW1⁄4NW1⁄4NE1⁄4, N1⁄2N1⁄2NW1 15 ⁄4 of section

16 8; of Township 12 South, Range 17 East, Boise Meridian.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Jeffrey P. Pritchett, certify that:



1. I have reviewed
this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of InnerWorkings, Inc.;



2. Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; and



3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





|By: | /
    S /  JEFFREY P. PRITCHETT | 
|--- | ------------------------------- | 
|    | Jeffrey P. Pritchett            | 
|    | Chief Financial Officer         | 







Date: March 10, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              86
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       668
<INVENTORY>                                      7,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,838
<PP&E>                                         686,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                 361,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,119
<BONDS>                                        145,134
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,047
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,109
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,327
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2019049EN.01000101.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9152 — BC Partners/United Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 49/01)

On 18 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9152. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9152. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### WELLS FARGO BANK v. STROUP, S.

7 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/03/2017

Reargument Denied 7/20/2017

No-13-0084

(Carbon)

Appeal Dismissed
No. 12-6365.

#### Holland *v.*Monroe County Children and Youth Services et al.

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 1 55

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                       665
<INVENTORY>                                      8,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,164
<PP&E>                                         625,132
<DEPRECIATION>                                 324,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,704
<BONDS>                                        136,081
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,109
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,382
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,434
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                       819
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,126
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,126
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John W. Hayden
    
    /s/ John I. Von LehmanJohn W. Hayden
    
    John I. Von LehmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryAugust 4, 2005A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to
The Midland Company and will be retained by
The Midland Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
 36
DEPARTMENT OFTRA1'lSPORTATION (4910-13·PI
""Uf:-nS 'Tl""Sllol9"l Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

### .~



# cl_ Ii- [Docket No. FAA-200_-*"'***; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-121-AD;



## .u'; "I'· 1/ 

# Ie
,_. :7 Amendment 39-*****j AD 200*-**-**) RIN 2120·AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A380-841, -842, and -861 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Departmcnl ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; request forcomments. ,n / f"jJi/'7 

## P 

# ..


# "~1~/oq

OlIJ' n'li ~Y\l1lO1 

## A:tJ1J" ~

## '1 SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products list d

## C.

# V,--- '" above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as;

As aresult oftheMovable Flap Track Fairing (MFTF) #6 crack findings (ref. AD 2008-0216), adetailed review has been launched forall MFTF #2 to #6. This investigation has revealed some cracking atMFTF #4 pivot support-ring. lAH. 

## Ilv-lI-b9 """J'I~':.W~IHOI, 

# 1IiJ)J-lc\ '''TIo\LsSI~ ./ rc This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to in-flight Jossof MFTF #4, potentially resulting in injuries to persons on the ground.


### * 

## * * 

## * * * * "~IAl)'t1(, 

## :;>.), I

• > •

. \11 , -I C. L. t '''tIl""snll'O" This AD requires actions that are intended 10 address the unsafe condition described in theMCAI. ~ITI"I~"'"


### ""
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Florida Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Florida Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 368    | 336   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 297    | 260    | 193    | 169    | 174    | 159    | 165    |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 129    | 162    | 170    | 166    | 165    | 152    | 150    | 150    | 156    | 159   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 164    | 157    | 156    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1489

To redesignate the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Investigation Building

located at Ninth and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, as

the Federal Bureau of Investigation Building.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 23 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 7), 1993

Mr. METZENBAUM (for himself, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. FEINGOLD,

Mr. HARKIN, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, and Mr. DASCHLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To redesignate the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Investigation Building located at Ninth and Pennsylvania

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, as the Federal Bureau

of Investigation Building.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION AND RENAMING OF THE FED4 ERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION BUILDING.

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The J. Edgar Hoover Federal

6 Bureau of Investigation Building located at Ninth and
2

S 1489 IS

1 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, is redesig2 nated as the Federal Bureau of Investigation Building.

3 (b) SIGNS.—The Administrator of the General Serv4 ices Administration shall cause all signs and engravings

5 designating the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of Inves6 tigation Building to read the Federal Bureau of Investiga7 tion Building.

8 (c) LEGAL REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law,

9 regulation, document, record, map, or other paper of the

10 United States to the J. Edgar Hoover Federal Bureau of

11 Investigation Building shall be deemed to be a reference

12 to the ‘‘Federal Bureau of Investigation Building’’.

Æ
#### Ben R. WOODS, Sr., Appellant, v. VENTURES TRUST 2013-I-NH BY MCM CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, its Trustee, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2650

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 9, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Charles 0. Mitchell, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Famous Uncle Als Hot Dogs & Grille, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Paul Esposito, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1. The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/   Paul Esposito Paul Esposito Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  April 15, 2010
FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LIMITED, et al. , Plaintiffs,

and

HUNCHUN FOREST WOLF INDUSTRY COMPANY LIMITED, et al. , Plaintiff-Intervenors,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant,

and

THE COALITION FOR AMERICAN HARDWOOD PARITY,

Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 12 -

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

JUDGMENT Whereas the United States Department of Commerce has filed its Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 77, which was issued pursuant to the court’s Aug. 31, 2012, opinion and order, Slip Op. 12-113, ECF No. 76; and Plaintiffs have filed their response thereto, ECF No. 80, in which Plaintiffs supported the Redetermination; and no other

1 This action was consolidated with portions of the complaints from Court Nos. 12-00009, 12-00017, and 12-00022. Order, Apr. 5, 2012, ECF No. 50. Before: Donald C. Pogue, Chief Judge

Consol. Court No. 11-00533 1Consol. Court No. 11-00533 Page 2

party having filed a response; and the court having reviewed all pleadings and papers on file herein; and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China, 76 Fed. Reg. 64,313 (Dep’t Commerce Oct. 18, 2011) (final affirmative countervailing duty determination), as modified by the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 77, is AFFIRMED.

_____/s/ Donald C. Pogue_____ Donald C. Pogue, Chief Judge

Dated: November 15, 2012 New York, New York
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00229

- CV

TEXAS P.M.R., INC. and John Ripley,

Appellants

v.

Robert RIPLEY and Mary Guzman,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 23830

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the Order D enying Plaintiffs’ First

Amended Application for Injunctive Relief is AFFIRMED. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed

solely against Appellant John Ripley.

SIGNED December 18, 2019.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
382P10-6

#### State v. John Lewis Wray, Jr.

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Review

Dismissed

Beasley, J., recused