alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40376

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PEDRO SANCHEZ-ALBA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-303-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Pedro Sanchez-Alba (Sanchez) has

moved for leave to withdraw and filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez has not

responded to this motion. Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                                
|View History:                                                                                       
|                                                                                                    
|New York Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                    
|New York Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18     | 19     | 23    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25     | 28     | 29     | 30     | 30     | 29     | 28     | 27     | 26     | 24    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24     | 23     | 20     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-9696.

#### Lewellyn et vir, on Behalf of J. L. et al. *v.*Sarasota County School Board.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 33.1**

** **

**LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.**

** **

**SERVICER'S REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

Long Beach Securities Corp. (the "Asserting Party") is responsible forassessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from January 1,2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") of the PlatformTransactions (as defined below) with the servicing criterion set forth in Item1122(d)(3)(i)(C) of Regulation AB (12 CFR part 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(C)) (the "ApplicableServicing Criterion") and no others**.**  The transactions coveredby this Servicer's Assessment are those securitizations of pools of mortgageloans that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 and prior to January 1,2007 for which the Asserting Party performed servicing functions set forth inItem 1122(d) and that included one or more classes of publicly offeredsecurities registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant tothe Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform Transactions").

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriterion for the Reporting Period, using the Applicable Servicing Criterion,and has concluded that it has complied in all material respects with theApplicable Servicing Criterion with respect to the Mortgage Loans. 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued anattestation report on the Asserting Party's assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criterion for the Reporting Period.

 

Dated: February 22, 2007

 

LONG BEACH SECURITIES CORP.

 

 

By:   /s/ Douglas A. Potolsky  _______Name:  Douglas A. PotolskyTitle:    Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q. Items 1 through 22 are as of September 30, 2000. Items 23 through 38 are
for the nine months ended September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      437,627
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,723
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          73,343
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        24,452
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 539,145
<COMMON>                                        16,517
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      120,596
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             60,189
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 197,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           183,628
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 147,015
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  539,145
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      220,660
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            11,308
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     179,835
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     191,143
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         29,517
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,531
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  31,048
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,112
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,936
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   20,936
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,117
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,096
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          45,494
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28


</TABLE>
May 19, 2015 

 

Sam Flower 

P.O. Box 1654 

Gig Harbor, WA 98335 

Dear Mr. Sam Flower: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 23rd, 2015 exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-0711), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24203-24204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #2790]


Shipping Coordinating Committee, Maritime Safety Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee will conduct an open meeting at 
9:30 A.M. on Tuesday, May 5, 1998, in Room 2415, at U.S. Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2100 2<SUP>nd</SUP> Street,

[[Page 24204]]

SW, Washington, D.C. The purpose of this meeting will be to finalize 
preparations for the 69<SUP>th</SUP> Session of the Maritime Safety 
Committee, and associated bodies of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO), which is scheduled for May 11-20, 1998, at IMO 
Headquarters in London. At this meeting, papers received and the draft 
U.S. positions will be discussed.
    Among other things, the items of particular interest are:
    a. Adoption of amendments to the Safety of Life at Sea.
    b. Role of the human element.
    c. Matters related to the Irradiated Nuclear Fuel (INF) Code.
    d. Formal safety assessment.
    e. Sole look-out at night, and;
    f. Report of eight subcommittees--Stability, Load Lines and Fishing 
Safety; Fire Protection; Safety of Navigation; Ship Design and 
Equipment; Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargoes and Containers; 
Radiocommunication and Search and Rescue; Bulk Liquids Gases and 
Training and Watchkeeping.
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing to Mr. Joseph J. Angelo, Commandant (G-MS), U.S. Coast Guard, 
2100 2<SUP>nd</SUP> Street, SW, Room 1218, Washington, DC 20593-0001 or 
by calling (202) 267-2970.

    Dated: March 31, 1998.
Russell A. La Mantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 98-11596 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo
      Napolitano, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Dated:
                December 29, 2005/s/
                Angelo NapolitanoAngelo
                Napolitano
              Chief
                Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc. and will be
      returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 35.1**

** **

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify toWaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  February 1, 2006 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank,National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR2 for the 2006 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

 

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the ServicingAgreement has been made under my supervision.

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under theServicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

 

 

Dated as of February 22, 2007.

 
|  

/s/ H. John Berens

___________________________________________

Name:  H. John Berens

Title:    Senior Vice President |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MATTER OF: JAHAAN SHAHEED

MOTION FOR EXTENSION PURSUANT

TO RULE 311 :

:

: No. 48 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of May , 2020

, the Request for Extension of Admission to

Practice Law is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1


    Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                   CERTIFICATE OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

         This  Certificate is being  delivered  pursuant to the  requirements of
Section  1350 of  Chapter  63 (Mail  Fraud)  of Title 18  (Crimes  and  Criminal
Procedures)  of the United  States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The  undersigned,  who  are  the  Co-Chief  Executive  Officers  of Cox
Technologies, Inc. ("Company") hereby certifies as follows:

         The  Quarterly  Report of Form 10-Q of the  Company  ("Report"),  which
accompanies  this  Certificate,  fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  and all  information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:    03-16-04     /s/ Brian D. Fletcher           /s/ Kurt C. Reid
         --------     ---------------------------     --------------------------
                      Brian D. Fletcher               Kurt C. Reid
                      Co-Chief Executive Officer      Co-Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8317

HARVEY P. SHORT, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

PRIME CARE MEDICAL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRED; DR CORDER, 

Psychiatrist; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUSH; NURSE; CORRECTIONAL 

OFFICER TERRY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRY; LIEUTENANT 

ROGERS; JOHN MCKAY, Jail Administrator; DAVID FARMER, 

Counselor Supervisor; LAVANA DAVIS-HARVEY, Counselor; 

SERGEANT THOMPSON; SERGEANT BINOIN; SERGEANT ATKINS; MARK 

BECK, Physician Assistant; SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, 

Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00933) 

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Dustin Dillard, John 

Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, 

Charleston, West Virginia; Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant 

Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William 

Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, 

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

Short’s motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure 

to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Prime Care 

Medical, No. 2:06-cv-00933 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 17, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1039 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 

predominantly within an Indian reservation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2011 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself, Mr. BOREN, Mr. COLE, Mr. LUCAS, and Mr. 

LANKFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used predominantly within an 

Indian reservation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN EMPLOY4 MENT CREDIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45A of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (f). 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1039 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2011. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF DEPRECIATION RULES 

5 FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (j) of section 168 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 paragraph (8). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

11 December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 /
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Cobra Oil & Gas Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Massimiliano Pozzoni, Chief Executive and Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





/s/ Massimiliano
      PozzoniName: 
      Massimiliano PozzoniTitle:    Chief Executive and Financial
      OfficerDate:   
      August 20, 2009
#### Rashawn D. HUTCHINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 11

                                MAXXAM INC.

                         COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME
                   PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
        (IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months Ended          Nine Months Ended
                                             September 30,               September 30,
                                      --------------------------- ---------------------------
                                           1997          1996          1997          1996
                                      ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted average common and common
     equivalent shares outstanding
     during each period                   8,958,578     9,377,029     9,160,220     9,376,812
Common equivalent shares attributable
     to stock options and convertible
     securities                             135,661        89,465       110,761        91,871
                                      ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
     Weighted average common and
          common equivalent shares        9,094,239     9,466,494     9,270,981     9,468,683
                                      ============= ============= ============= =============
                                                                               
Net income                            $        18.0 $         5.3 $        50.6 $        28.0
                                      ============= ============= ============= =============

Net income per common and common
     equivalent share                 $        1.98 $         .56 $        5.46 $        2.96
                                      ============= ============= ============= =============

</TABLE>