Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 92 /Wednesday, May 13, 1998 / Notices 26625

be made available for inspection by

interested persons in the Office of the

Secretary to the Commission. To be

assured of consideration by the

Commission, written statements relating

to the Commission’s report should be

submitted at the earliest practical date

and should be received no later than

June 30, 1998.

Address all submissions to the

Secretary to the Commission, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20436.

Hearing-impaired persons are advised

that information on this matter can be

obtained by contacting the

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)

205–1810. General information

concerning the Commission may also be

obtained by accessing its Internet server

(http://www.usitc.gov).

Issued: May 7, 1998.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–12683 Filed 5–12–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337–TA–409]

Certain CD-ROM Controllers and

Products Containing Same-II;

Investigation

AGENCY: International Trade

Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a

complaint was filed with the U.S.

International Trade Commission on

April 7, 1998, under section 337 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Oak

Technology, Inc., 139 Kifer Court,

Sunnyvale, California 94086. On April

20 and April 24, 1998, Oak filed

supplements to its complaint. The

complaint, as supplemented, alleges

violations of section 337 in the

importation into the United States, the

sale for importation, and the sale within

the United States after importation of

certain CD-ROM controllers and

products containing same by reason of

infringement of claims 1–5 and 8–10 of

U.S. Letters Patent 5,581,715. The

complaint further alleges that there

exists an industry in the United States

as required by subsection (a)(2) of

section 337.

The complainant requests that the

Commission institute an investigation

and, after the investigation, issue a

permanent exclusion order and a

permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for

any confidential information contained

therein, is available for inspection

during official business hours (8:45 a.m.

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the

Secretary, U.S. International Trade

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room

112, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone

202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired

individuals are advised that information

on this matter can be obtained by

contacting the Commission’s TDD

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons

with mobility impairments who will

need special assistance in gaining access

to the Commission should contact the

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.

General information concerning the

Commission may also be obtained by

accessing its internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas L. Jarvis, Esq., Office of Unfair

Import Investigations, U.S. International

Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–

2568.

Authority: The authority for institution of

this investigation is contained in section 337

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and

in 210.10 of the Commission’s rules of

practice and procedure, 19 CFR 210.10

(1997).

SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having

considered the complaint, the U.S.

International Trade Commission, on

May 7, 1998, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as

amended, an investigation be instituted

to determine whether there is a

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of

section 337 in the importation into the

United States, the sale for importation,

or the sale within the United States after

importation of certain CD-ROM

controllers or products containing same

by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2,

3, 4, 5, 8, 9, or 10 of U.S. Letters Patent

5,581,715, and whether there exists an

industry in the United States as required

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

(2) For the purpose of the

investigation so instituted, the following

are hereby named as parties upon which

this notice of investigation shall be

served:

(a) The complainant is—Oak

Technology, Inc., 139 Kifer Court,

Sunnyvale, CA 94086.

(b) The respondents are the following

companies alleged to be in violation of

section 337, and are the parties upon

which the complaint is to be served:

MediaTek, Inc., No. 13 Innovation Road

I, Science-Based Industrial Park,

Hsinchu, Taiwan

United Microelectronics Corporation,

No. 3, Li-Hsin Road II, Science-Based

Industrial Park, Hsinchu, Taiwan

Lite-On Technology Corp., 5F, 16, Sec.

4, Nanking E. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan

AOpen, Inc., 6F, #88, Sec. 1, Hsin Tai

Wu Rd., Hsichih, Taipei Hsien,

Taiwan 221

(c) Thomas L. Jarvis, Esq., Office of

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.

International Trade Commission, 500 E

Street, SW., Room 401–J, Washington,

D.C. 20436, who shall be the

Commission investigative attorney,

party to this investigation; and

(3) For the investigation so instituted,

the Honorable Sidney Harris is

designated as the presiding

administrative law judge.

Responses to the complaint and the

notice of investigation must be

submitted by the named respondents in

accordance with § 210.13 of the

Commission’s rules of practice and

procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such

responses will be considered by the

Commission if received not later than 20

days after the date of service by the

Commission of the complaint and the

notice of investigation. Extensions of

time for submitting responses to the

complaint will not be granted unless

good cause therefor is shown.

Failure of a respondent to file a timely

response to each allegation in the

complaint and in this notice may be

deemed to constitute a waiver of the

right to appear and contest the

allegations of the complaint and this

notice, and to authorize the

administrative law judge and the

Commission, without further notice to

the respondent, to find the facts to be as

alleged in the complaint and this notice

and to enter both an initial

determination and a final determination

containing such findings, and may

result in the issuance of a limited

exclusion order or a cease and desist

order or both directed against such

respondent.

Issued: May 7, 1998.

By order of the Commission.

Donna R. Koehnke,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 98–12676 Filed 5–12–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P