alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Georgia Natural Gas Imports from All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Georgia Natural Gas Imports from All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |        |        |        |         |         |         |         |         | 0      
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0       | 2,563  | 16,837 | 43,927 | 105,203 | 132,062 | 146,766 | 170,243 | 135,711 | 142,244
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 106,454 | 75,641 | 59,266 | 15,575 | 7,155   | 11,786  | 8,673   | 6,514   | 14,500  | 5,648  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,693   | 0      | 0      |        |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6493.

#### Figueroa *v.*New York.

App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.
Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS TORONTO · MONTREAL             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated July 22, 2009 on the financial statements of UOMO Media Inc., (Formerly First Source Data Inc. (the Company) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009.   Schwartz Levitsky Feldman  Toronto, Ontario, Canada Chartered Accountants August 11, 2009 Licensed Public Accountants  1167 Caledonia Road Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1 Tel:  416 785 5353 Fax:  416 785 5663
No. 12-6602.

#### Almendarez *v.*Texas.

Ct. App. Tex., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### Lee Grace DOUGHERTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3554

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pas-co County; Susan G. Barthle, Judge.

Dismissed.
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1433

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-salicylamide, 2-

[N-benzyl-N-tert-butylamino]-4′-hydroxy-3′-hydromethylacetophenone hydrochloride, flutamide, and loratadine.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. BRADLEY (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-

salicylamide, 2-[N-benzyl-N-tert-butylamino]-4′-hydroxy3′-hydromethylacetophenone hydrochloride, flutamide,

and loratadine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1433 IS

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSIONS OF DUTY ON 5-(N,N2 DIBENZYLGLYCYL)-SALICYLAMIDE, 2-[N3 BENZYL-N-TERT-BUTYLAMINO]-4′-HYDROXY-3′-

4 HYDROMETHYLACETOPHENONE HYDRO5 CHLORIDE, FLUTAMIDE, AND LORATADINE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

9 new headings:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 5-(N,N-dibenzylglycyl)-salicylamide (LBH–B/C, CAS

No. 30566–92–8) (provided

for in subheading

2922.30.3000) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96

9902.31.13 2-(N-benzyl-N-tertbutylamino)- 4′-hydroxy-3′-

hydromethyl- acetophenone

hydrochloride (Glycyl Hydrochloride, CAS No.

24085–08–3) (provided for

in subheading

2922.30.3000) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96

9902.31.14 Flutamide (CAS No.

13311–84–7) (provided for

in subheading

2924.29.3950) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96

9902.31.15 Loratadine (CAS No.

79794–75–5) (provided for

in subheading

2933.90.2600) .................... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) applies with respect to articles entered, or

12 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

13 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3227

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. David Teague, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 2009 Filed: February 17, 2009

___________ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David Teague pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court 1 sentenced him as an armed career criminal (ACC) under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 based on seve ral prior violent-felony convictions, including two burglary convictions and one robbery conviction. According to the unobjected-to facts contained in the pres entence report (PSR), both of Teague’s burglary convictions involved the unlawful entry into a commercial building with intent to commit larceny. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a-2- brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the district court erred in holding that some of Teague’s prior fe lony convictions were violent felonies for ACC purposes.
After careful de novo review, seeUnited States v. Livingston , 442 F.3d 1082, 1083 (8th Cir. 2006), we concl ude the district court did not err in sentencing Teague as an ACC based on his two prior burgl ary convictions and his prior robbery conviction. See Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575, 599 (1990) (person has been convicted of burglary for purposes of § 924(e) enhancement if convicted of any crime having basic elements of unlawful entry into a building with intent to commit crime); United States v. Bell , 445 F.3d 1086, 1090-91 (8th Cir. 2006) (based on unobjected-to facts in PSR, district court correctly heldthat appellant’s prior commercial-burglary conviction was for crime of violence under Guidelines); United States v. Johnson , 411 F.3d 928, 931-32 (8th Cir. 2005) (robbery is crime of violence under Guidelines); see also United States v. Williams , 537 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court has never recognized difference between “crime of vi olence” and “violent felony”). Therefore, we need not address the treatmentof Teague’s other convictions.
Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Acco rdingly, we affirm. We also grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
PACIFIC MONUMENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION


800 Third Avenue


New York, NY 10022







 


_______________, 2012


 





[Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC]


[Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited]


 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement that,
commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Pacific Monument
Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the
Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the liquidation of the Company’s trust account (defined below) (in each
case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
[Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited] shall make available to the Company certain
office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at [800 Third
Avenue, New York, New York 10022][14th Floor, Albert Embankment, London, SE1 7TP] (or any successor location). In exchange
therefore, the Company shall pay ProChannel [Monument Capital Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited]
the sum of $2,750 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. [Monument Capital
Group SPAC I LLC][Pacific Capital Partners & Associates Limited] hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it
may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not
seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.













 





 


	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	 	PACIFIC MONUMENT ACQUISITION CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	 	Name:
	 	 	Title:


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 





[Monument Capital Group
SPAC I LLC]


[PACIFIC CAPITAL PARTNERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED]







 


 


	By:	 
	 	Name:
	 	Title:
No. 12-516.

#### Embody *v.*Ward.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Montana Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 55,577 | 50,918 | 50,405 | 51,305  | 45,506  | 45,398  | 50,582  | 50,212
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 49,338 | 50,944 | 52,960 | 53,787 | 49,785 | 49,667  | 50,420  | 52,028  | 57,235  | 60,728
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 69,664 | 80,927 | 85,500 | 85,412 | 96,128 | 106,769 | 111,423 | 115,272 | 110,907 | 96,392
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 86,172 | 73,372 | 65,463 | 61,597 | 57,490 | 49,626  | 46,374  | 44,760  | 42,096  | 42,074
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 37,109 | 37,479 | 37,495 |        |        |         |         |         |         |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Project No. 1417-001 and Project No. 1835-013]


Central Nebraska Public Power and Irrigation District and 
Nebraska Public Power District; Notice of Public Briefing

May 6, 1998.
    Parties to this relicensing proceeding recently advised the 
Commission that they anticipate filing a comprehensive settlement 
agreement on May 15, 1998. In response to a request by the U.S. 
Department of the Interior (Interior), the Commission will host a 
public briefing on the settlement agreement. The briefing will be held 
on Tuesday, May 19, 1998, at 1:00 p.m., in the Commission Meeting Room, 
located on the second floor of 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
Interior and other key parties to the settlement agreement will brief 
the Commissioners on the major provisions of the settlement agreement 
and its relationship to the Platte River Cooperative Agreement, and 
will answer any questions. This portion of the briefing will take 
approximately one hour. After a short recess, the briefing will 
continue with more detailed presentations and discussions with 
Commission staff.
    The briefing will be recorded by a stenographer, and the transcript 
will become part of the Commission's public record of this proceeding. 
Anyone wishing to receive a copy of the transcript of the briefing may 
contact Ace Federal Reporting Company by calling (202) 347-3700 or by 
writing to 1120 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005.
    For further information, please contact Frankie Green at (202) 501-
7704.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12546 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 10.4**

**MENTOR CORPORATION**

**WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORSFEESPURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) ofRegulation S-K**

 

            Eachnon-employee member of the Board of Directors of Mentor Corporation receives aquarterly fee of $12,500, equaling a total annual fee of $50,000.  ThePresiding Independent Director receives an additional $5,000 per quarter,bringing the total annual fee for the Presiding Independent Director to$70,000.  In addition, under the Company's 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, eachnon-employee member of the Board of Directors is eligible to receive options topurchase shares of the Company's common stock.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 158    | 171    | 148    | 171    | 205    | 191    | 218   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 156    | 159    | 341    | 235    | 116    | 181    | 217    | 253    | 222    | 274   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 208    | 272    | 251    | 343    | 395    | 483    | 549    | 495    | 575    | 599   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 881    | 963    | 2,529  | 9,200  | 11,602 | 3,478  | 3,868  | 2,427  | 3,156  | 6,146 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,755  | 6,474  | 6,500  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000015320-JAN-201208:11 AM
No. 12-6361.

#### Boles *v.*Newth et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Embarq Corporation 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the FormS-8 (No. 333-134017 and No. 333-150607) registration statements of Embarq Corporation of our report dated February 12, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Embarq Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, the related financialstatement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Embarq Corporation and to the reference to our firmunder the heading, “Selected Financial Data” in the Form 10-K. Our report on the consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule refers to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 157, *Fair Value Measurements*, for its financial assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2008, FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes- an interpretation of FASB StatementNo. 109*, as of January 1, 2007 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and132(R),* as of December 31, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Kansas City, Missouri 

February 12, 2009
#### Walter Feiertag, Appellant, v Sheila Feiertag, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 367]

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a provision of a stipulation of settlement as an unenforceable penalty, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated February 6, 2003, which granted the defendant’s *575motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions on appeal, the provision of the parties’ stipulation of settlement at issue may not be properly characterized as a liquidated damages clause *(see Truck Rent-A-Ctr. v Puritan Farms 2nd,*41 NY2d 420, 424-425 [1977]; *Zervakis v Kyreakedes,*257 AD2d 619 [1999]; *Willner v Willner,*145 AD2d 236 [1989]). The provision, inter alia, did not purport to establish the amount of damages to be paid to the defendant in the event that the plaintiff breached an obligation under the stipulation *(see Truck Rent-A-Ctr. v Puritan Farms 2nd, supra; Zervakis v Kyreakedes, supra; Willner v Willner, supra).*Rather, the provision merely provided the plaintiff with the option, not the obligation, to purchase the defendant’s interest in the marital home *(see Truck Rent-A-Ctr. v Puritan Farms 2nd, supra; Zervakis v Kyreakedes, supra; Willner v Willner, supra).*In any event, even assuming that the provision may be properly characterized as a liquidated damages clause, the plaintiff does not argue, and the record does not reveal, that the provision constituted an unenforceable penalty when executed *(see Willner v Willner, supra).*The plaintiff failed to raise any basis for setting aside the provision of the stipulation of settlement *(see Christian v Christian,*42 NY2d 63 [1977]; *Michalowski v Michalowski,*286 AD2d 712 [2001]; *Creque v Creque,*210 AD2d 288 [1994]; *Cappello v Cappello,*274 AD2d 539 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.