alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: OCTOBERl, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

. SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0904 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

z ... 2 p 1: 30 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011NM060081) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Serviqe List 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative L 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: . Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 . 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl0001 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Representative 

Director - Government and Legal Affairs 

SkyWest Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

F~: 435-634-3505 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: · 425-227-2161 

F~: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 · 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

F~: 202-366-7536 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0904 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in pt,rson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Healing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Miller Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2012 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo Napolitano, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                                                                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: May 28, 2013                                                                   |  | 
|/s/  Angelo Napolitano                                                                |  | 
|Angelo Napolitano
        Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer |  | 





A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Miller Industries, Inc.
and will be returned by Miller Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 12-184.

#### Congrejo Investments, LLC *v.*Mann, Chapter 7 Trustee.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1555 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 613

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1555

                          [Report No. 103-369]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To clarify the treatment of the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, 
 Illinois, under title 23, United States Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 19 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                       Reported without amendment
                                                       Calendar No. 613
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1555

                          [Report No. 103-369]

    To clarify the treatment of the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, 
 Illinois, under title 23, United States Code, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             October 18 (legislative day, October 13), 1993

    Mr. Simon (for himself, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. Harkin, and Mr. 
   Grassley) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

           September 19 (legislative day, September 12), 1994

                Reported by Mr. Baucus without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To clarify the treatment of the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, 
 Illinois, under title 23, United States Code, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CENTENNIAL BRIDGE, ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS, 
              AGREEMENT.

    For purposes of section 129(a)(6) of title 23, United States Code, 
the agreement concerning the Centennial Bridge, Rock Island, Illinois, 
entered into under the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the city of 
Rock Island, Illinois, or its assigns, to construct, maintain, and 
operate a toll bridge across the Mississippi River at or near Rock 
Island, Illinois, and to a place at or near the city of Davenport, 
Iowa'', approved March 18, 1938 (52 Stat. 110, chapter 48), shall be 
treated as if the agreement had been entered into under section 129 of 
title 23, United States Code, as in effect on December 17, 1991, and 
may be modified in accordance with section 129(a)(6) of such title.
```
147P17

#### State v. Salim Abdu Gould

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Appellate Review

Dismissed
No. 12-6638.

#### Santiago *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 61     | 68    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 47     | 52     | 56     | 52     | 56     | 55     | 74     |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 120    | 129    | 133    | 137    | 129    | 128    | 130    | 133    | 140    | 141   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 154    | 156    | 152    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 12.2  I, John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Pediment Exploration Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Registration Statement that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: March 28, 2008  /s/ John Seaman John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-736.

#### Sibley *v.*Obama, President of the United States, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner to expedite consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Florida Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Florida (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Florida Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted in Florida (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 173    | 173    | 163    | 153    | 157    | 212   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 158    | 130    | 104    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0472 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 98-CE-97-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 12-7140.

#### Campbell et al. *v.*County of Merced, California, et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      |        | 427   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 400    | 426    | 406    | 406    | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6037** 

DALE L. SPARROW , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Roderick C
. Young , Magistrate Judge. ( 3:15

- cv - 00220

- RCY )

Submitted : June 30, 2016 Decided: July 8, 2016

Before GREGORY and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Dale L. Sparrow, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Elizabeth Baumgartner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bi nding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dale L. Sparrow seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeala bility. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pr isoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 32 2, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sparrow has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
S. 1381

One Hundred Third Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-three

An Act

To improve administrative services and support provided to the National Forest

Foundation, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Forest Foundation

Act Amendment Act of 1993’’.

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

It is the purpose of this Act—

(1) to provide for start-up and matching funds for project

expenses to carry out the National Forest Foundation Act;

and

(2) to extend the funding authorization for start-up

expenses for 1 year.

SEC. 3. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND SUPPORT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 405 of the National Forest Foundation

Act (16 U.S.C. 583j–3) is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)—

(A) by inserting ‘‘, project,’’ after ‘‘administrative’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘following the date of enactment of

this title’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning October 1, 1992’’; and

(2) in subsection (b)—

(A) by striking ‘‘from the date of enactment of this

title’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning October 1, 1992’’; and

(B) by inserting ‘‘and project’’ after ‘‘administrative’’.
S. 1381—2

(b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 410(b) of such Act (16

U.S.C. 583j–8(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘following the date of

enactment of this title,’’ and inserting ‘‘beginning October 1, 1992,’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
No. 12-6776.

#### Galluzzo *v.*Cook, fka Galluzzo.

Ct. App. Ohio, Champaign County. Certiorari denied.