alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|Idaho Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|Idaho Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          24,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,949
<PP&E>                                         105,225
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,727
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           489
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,887
<SALES>                                          8,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,510
<CGS>                                            4,431
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    343
<INCOME-TAX>                                       115
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                228
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JACOB C. YOUNG

, 1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

DARLENE YOUNG

,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 37, 2019

§

§ Court Below: Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ File No. C.A. No. 17

- 37514

§

§

§

Submitted: February 14 , 2019

Decided: February 18 , 2019

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; VALIHURA and VAUGHN , Justices

.

O R D E R

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response , it appears to

the Court that:

(1) On January 25, 2019 , t he appellant, Jacob C. Young , filed a notice of

appeal from a Family Court order dated and docketed on November 7 , 2018. Under

Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or

before December 7 , 2018.

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).2

(2) On January 25, 2019 , the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing

Mr. Young to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed

.

In his response to the notice to show cause, Mr. Young attributes the untimeliness

of his notice of ap peal to the fact that he was arrest ed in April 2018 and his resulting

need to focus his attention and financial resources on the defense of that matter, as

well as his unfamiliarity with the legal system as a pro se litigant

.

(3) Time is a jurisdictional requi rement. 2 A notice of appeal must be

received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period in

order to be effective. 3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to

comply strictly with the jurisdictional requireme nts. 4 Unless an appellant can

demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court

related personnel, an untimely appeal cannot be considered. 5

(4) Mr. Young has not demonstrated that his failure to file a timely notice

of appeal is attributable to court

- related personnel. Consequently , this case does not

fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice

of appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.

2 Carr v. State , 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).

3 S UPR

. C T

. R. 10(a)

.

4 Taylor v. Powell , 2015 WL 2452916 (Del. May 20, 2015).

5 Id.3

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b)

,

that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                              15


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mills Music Trust. (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and *results of operations of the
Trust.


Date: November 10, 2005                  /s/ Joel Faden
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Joel Faden, Joel Faden & Company, Inc.
                                         Chief Financial Individual
                                         Providing accounting services

*    The statements of cash receipts and disbursements reflect only cash
     transactions and do not include transactions that would be recorded in
     financial statements presented on the accrual basis of accounting. The
     Trust is required to distribute all funds received after payment of
     expenses. Accordingly, the Trust has not prepared any statements of
     financial condition or cash flows.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-018-1430-00; CACA 38224]


Notice of Realty Action, Direct Sale of Public Land, El Dorado 
County, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following described public land (surface and mineral) is 
being considered for direct sale pursuant to Sections 203 and 209 of 
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of October 21, 1976 (43 
U.S.C. 1713 and 1719):

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 8 N., R. 9 E.,
    Sec. 24, lot 12;
    Sec. 25, lot 13.

    The area described contains .65 acres in El Dorado County.

    The above described parcel of land would be sold to Mr. Gene Harm, 
an adjacent landowner, by direct sale, at fair market value. The 
disposal of this land will resolve an inadvertent trespass.
    The parcel would be transferred subject to a reservation to the 
United States for a right-of-way for ditches and canals. The conveyance 
would also be made subject to section 24 of the Federal Power Act of 
June 20, 1920, as amended (16 U.S.C. 791a). All necessary clearances 
including clearances for archeology and for rare plants and animals 
would be completed prior to any conveyance of title by the United 
States.
    The land described is hereby segregated from settlement under the 
public land laws including location and entry under the mining laws, 
pending disposition of this action, or 270 days from the date of 
publication of this notice, whichever occurs first.

ADDRESS: Detailed information concerning this action is available for 
review at the office of the Bureau of Land Management, Folsom Field 
Office, 63 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630.

DATES: On or before March 6, 1998, interested persons may submit 
comments to the Field Manager, Folsom Field Office at the above 
address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Beck, Realty Specialist, at the 
above address or by phone at (916) 985-4474.

Dated: January 8, 1998.
D.K. Swickard,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-1189 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|North Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|North Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 49     | 47    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 45     | 46     | 58     | 57     | 58     | 48     | 43     |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 52     | 55     | 54     | 55     | 59     | 63     | 64     | 69     | 71     | 72    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 74     | 78     | 81     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Embarq Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gene M.
Betts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Gene M. Betts   
|                    |  |  |  | Gene M. Betts          
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Stephen Dowd, is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CMS Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 27, 2007 |  | /s/ Stephen Dowd                                 
|                        |  | Stephen Dowd                                     
|                        |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-330.

#### Prescott, Executor of the Estate of Duby *v.*Department of Agriculture.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,122  | 3,239 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,078  | 4,021  | 4,534  | 4,069  | 3,834  | 3,858  | 3,928  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,877  | 3,914  | 3,947  | 4,021  | 4,016  | 3,925  | 3,923  | 3,930  | 3,574  | 3,463 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,493  | 3,507  | 3,799  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stanley Howard, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 262]

Appeal from a judgment of Cayuga County Court (Corning, J.), entered April 11, 2002, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, robbery in the first degree (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of, inter alia, three counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [2]-[4]) and one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (§ 265.03 [2]), defendant contends that County Court erred in admitting in evidence a gun and knife used in the commission of the crimes because there were deficiencies in the chain of custody with respect to both. We disagree. Where, as here, “ ‘the circumstances provide reasonable assurances of the identity and unchanged *1324condition’ of the evidence,” any deficiencies in the chain of custody go to the weight of the evidence and not its admissibility *(People v Julian,*41 NY2d 340, 343 [1977]; *see People v Thompson,*300 AD2d 1032, 1033 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 620 [2003]).

We reject the further contention of defendant that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence discovered as a result of a patdown search. Defendant consented to that search *(see People v Brewer,*200 AD2d 579, 580 [1994], *Iv denied*83 NY2d 869 [1994], *cert denied*513 US 850 [1994]) and, when officers were unable to determine whether any of the numerous hard objects in defendant’s pockets were weapons, they were justified in reaching into defendant’s pockets in order to determine whether any of the objects were weapons *(see People v Taylor,*123 AD2d 651, 651-652 [1986], *lv denied*69 NY2d 718 [1986]; *see also People v Harry, 187*AD2d 669 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 789 [1993]).

We further conclude that the evidence is legally sufficient to support the conviction and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.