alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100    | 100   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100    | 100    | 100    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
246P16-3

#### State v. Christopher Charles Friscia, The Trust, and Maria Adriana Friscia, The Trust

Defs’ *Pro Se*Motion to Reconsider

Dismissed
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0477. CHRISTINE METTER v. LONI D. METTER.

This case was initiated when Loni D. Metter filed a petition seeking to adopt

her three minor stepchildren. Acknowledging that the children’s biological mother,

Christine Metter, was alive, Loni D. Metter further sought in her petition the

termination of Christine Metter’s parental rights. On May 4, 2017, the trial court

entered an order terminating Christine Metter’s parental rights, and further

designating a time frame for scheduling a final adoption hearing.

From that order, Christine Metter filed the instant pro se discretionary

application. She also has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. For reasons

that follow, we lack jurisdiction.

Ordinarily, a party seeking to appeal an order terminating parental rights must

file an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (12). But where,

as here, the contested order did not resolve all issues in the case, the case remains

pending in the trial court. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) (providing for a direct appeal

from a “final judgment[ ], that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the

court below”). Thus, Christine Metter wasrequired to follow the interlocutory appeal

procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471

SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589

(1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991); Park v. Bailey, 329 Ga. App. 569, 571 (765 SE2d 721)

(2014); Gray v. Springs, 224 Ga. App. 427, 427 (481 SE2d 3) (1997). Because she

did not do so, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby

June 19, 2017
DISMISSED.1

Christine Metter’s motion for the appointment of counsel is accordingly

DISMISSED as MOOT. See In the Interest of B. R. F., 299 Ga. 294, 298-299 (788

SE2d 416) (2016) (explaining that appellate court could not reach issue concerning

whether indigent parent was entitled to appointment of counsel, where parent failed

to perfect jurisdiction).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1 But see Rokowski v. Gilbert, 275 Ga. App. 305, 305 (1) (620 SE2d 509)

(2005) (explaining that a timely filed notice of appeal from a final judgment and

decree of adoption gave appellate court jurisdiction to consider previous orders

entered in case, including an order terminating the biologicalfather’s parentalrights).

06/19/2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0733 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CLEVE ERNEST SPANG,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 3, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2024

07/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0733
[4910-13-Pj

LmNGSyMBOl

,

/If.,

,

-/< 8

11-27-0Y·

ERJ 170 Airplanes

LrrI~G£YMSOl

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products. NM-f

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

Ainvortbiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mod

~D\O-onLP

[Docket No. FAA-:!669-· •••••"'; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-201-ADI

Federal Aviation Administration

RIN 2120-AA64

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

14 CFR Part 39

,

NITIAI.S'SIG

C'

tt1/1.,1r.,

"-,

I I

During ERJ 170 airplane full scale fatigue test, cracks were found in some

structural components of the airplane. Analysis of these cracks resulted in

modifications on the airplane Airworthiness Limitation Items (ALl), to

include new inspections tasks or modification of existing ones and its

respective thresholds and intervals.

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

condition as:

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe N

I

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

'"

* * * * * * *

Failure to inspect these components according to the new tasks, thresholds

and intervals, could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracks.

Undetected fatigue cracks in these areas could adversely affect the

structural integrity of these airplanes.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditi 1

described in the MeAl.
No. 12-6926.

#### Jennings *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26792-26793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2284-000]


MEG Marketing, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

May 8, 1998.
    MEG Marketing, LLC (MEG) submitted for filing a rate schedule under 
which MEG will engage in wholesale electronic power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. MEG also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, MEG requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by MEG.
    On May 4, 1998, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:

[[Page 26793]]

    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by MEG should file a motion to intervene or 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, MEG is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of MEG's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is June 3, 1998. Copies of 
the full text of the order are available from the Commission's Public 
Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12785 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies that the annual report on Form 10-K of Ascend Acquisition Corp. (“the Registrant”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




Dated:  March 25, 2010


/s/ Don K. RiceDon K. Rice

Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,

President and Treasurer (Principal executive and

financial officer)
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Florida Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Florida Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 211    | 237   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 223    | 258    | 258    | 252    | 224    | 273    | 310    |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 452    | 468    | 337    | 362    | 355    | 327    | 336    | 323    | 335    | 345   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 351    | 341    | 352    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1408

To repeal the increase in tax on social security benefits.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 6 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the increase in tax on social security benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TAX INCREASE ON SOCIAL SECU4 RITY BENEFITS.

5 Section 13215 of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of

6 1993 is hereby repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code

7 of 1986 shall be applied and administered as if such sec8 tion (and the amendments made thereby) had not been

9 enacted.

Æ
IIB 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1214 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To repeal mandatory funding for school-based health center 

construction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 1214 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REPEALING MANDATORY FUNDING FOR 

2 SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH CENTER CONSTRUC3 TION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 4101 of 

5 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 280h–4) is repealed. 

7 (b) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

8 funds made available by section 4101(a) of the Patient 

9 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 280h– 

10 4(a)), the unobligated balance is rescinded. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 4, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                    CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-3
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.



/s/ Craig Baingo                                           Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 29     | 26     | 43     | 39     | 41     | 51    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 69     | 71     | 87     | 97     | 19     | 15     | 17     | 15     | 12    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 7      | 7      | 41     | 62     | 68     | 140    | 446    | 457    | 501   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 428    | 549    | 560    | 458    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6854.

#### Rhodes *v.*Varano, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Coal Township, et al.

C. A. Bd Cir. Certiorari denied.
## SPORTMiO N Pi : u s

OFFIC EO FMAYO RVIR GBERNER O 12 4 W . MICfflGANAVENUE- NINT H FLOO R

LANSING , M I 4893 3 Februar y 17 , 201 2 Docke t Managemen t

Facilit y U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : Su nCountr y Slo t

Exemptio n- Docke t

Numbe r FAA-2012-008 9 Dea r Ladie s an dGentlemen : O n behal f o f th e Cit y o f

Lansing , I writ e thi s lette r t o expres s m y stron g support t o retai nSu nCountr y Airline' s dail y non-sto p 737-80 0 ser/ic e betwee nLansing' s Capita l Regiona l Internationa l Airpor t (LAN ) an dWashington' s Reaga nNationa l Airpor t (DCA) . A recen t

Unite dState s Cour t

o f Appeal s rulin g vacatin g aDO T orde r woul dresul t

i nSu nCountr y losin g it s existin g servic e betwee nDC A an dLAN . I norde r t o continu e thi s vita l transportatio nservice , I as k tha t Su nCountry' s reques t

for exemptio nfromth e slo t limi t for DC A se t forthi n§93.12 3 (a) , whic hpermit s th e FA A t o creat e ai r carrie r slot s durin g certai nlimite dhour s fo r Su nCountry' s use , b e granted . ITi e propose dai r carrie r slot s woul dreplac e tw o slo t exemption s unde r

DO T Orde r

2010-12-1 6 awarde dt o Su n Country . Specifically , Si mCountr y desire s on e dail y slo t durin g eac ho f

th e 100 0 an d110 0 hours . Th e propose dexemptio n woul dpermi t

Su nCountr y t o continu e operatin g it s existin g ser/icc s an davoi da ninequitabl e resul t o f th e Court' s order . A s I a msur e yo u ar e aware , Lansin g i s Michigan' s stat e capita l an dhom e t o Michiga nStat e University , a s wel l a s dozen s o f othe r majo r employer s an dhundied s o f stat e associations , mos t

o f whic hrequir e regula r

trave l t o Washingto nD.C

- Th e volum e o f trave l t o ou r

nation' s capita l b y thes e organization s an dou r busines s communit y make s th e time-savin g natur e an d convenienc e o f

4irec t ai r servic e betwee n Lansin g an dWashingto nD.C . acrucia l nee dfor ou r community . Th e Su nCoimtry DC A servic e i s essentia l t o th e economi c growt ho f th e greate r

Lansin g region . Outsid e o f Detroit , Michigan , Lansin g i s th e orJ y othe r cit y wit hlarg e aircraf

t (737-800 ) tl^a

t proyiJie s dail y servic e t o DCA . Prio r t o Su nCountry , th e regiona l communit y ha drequeste dth e introductio no f thi s servic e fr6mnumerou s othe r airlin e operator s withou t success . Therefore , i t

i s critica l tha t

fhe FAA'^ ® ^ ^ necessar y step s t o ensil e th e continuatio no f th e Su nCountr y slot s at th e establishe dfligh t

time s i nsuppor t

o f Greate r Lansing' s busines s an deconomi c growth . I strongl y urg e th e U.S . Departipen t o f Transportation' s immediat e approva l o f thi s exemptio ns o tha t

Su nCountr y ca nbegi nt o ente r flight schedule s fo r

sal e fo r th e balanc e o f

2012 . Sincerely , Virg'Bemer o Mayo r o f Lansin g