alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                           
|                                                                                                        
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others   (Percent)
|                                                                                                        
|                                                                                                        
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Residential Consumers Delivered for the Account of Others   (Percent)
|                                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 3      | 3      | 5      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
514PA11-2

#### State v. Harry Sharod James

1. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-684)

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Defs Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question

4. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

6. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

6. State’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 05/20/2016

2. Allowed

3.-

4. Allowed

5. Allowed

6. Allowed
No. 12-6923.

#### Cowan *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1110 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1110

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the maximum monthly 
 rate for the military special pay known as hostile fire pay, imminent 
danger pay, or hazardous duty pay, to increase the maximum monthly rate 
  for the family separation allowance paid to deployed members of the 
                 Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2011

   Mr. McNerney (for himself, Mr. Walz of Minnesota, and Mr. Filner) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the maximum monthly 
 rate for the military special pay known as hostile fire pay, imminent 
danger pay, or hazardous duty pay, to increase the maximum monthly rate 
  for the family separation allowance paid to deployed members of the 
                 Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combat Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF SPECIAL PAY FOR DUTY SUBJECT TO 
              HOSTILE FIRE OR IMMINENT DANGER OR FOR DUTY IN FOREIGN 
              AREA DESIGNATED AS AN IMMINENT DANGER AREA.

    (a) Special Pay for Duty Subject to Hostile Fire or Imminent 
Danger.--Section 310(b)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``$225 a month'' and inserting ``$260 a month''.
    (b) Hazardous Duty Pay.--Section 351(b)(3) of such title is amended 
by striking ``$250 per month'' and inserting ``$260 per month''.
    (c) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this section 
shall take effect on October 1, 2011, and apply with respect to months 
beginning on or after that date.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF FAMILY SEPARATION ALLOWANCE.

    (a) Increase.--Section 427(a)(1) of title 37, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``$250'' and inserting ``$285''.
    (b) Application of Amendment.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall take effect on October 1, 2011, and apply with respect to months 
beginning on or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
#### Cornelio HERRERA-MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3295

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed February 24, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fía. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Michael F. Andrews, Judge.

Affirmed.
No. 12-6404.

#### Freisinger *v.*Keith, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Port of Morgan, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Port of Morgan, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         | 553,073 | 548,022 | 556,215 | 790,427
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 784,583 | 648,400 | 768,533 | 699,288 | 730,512 | 713,459 | 665,804 | 763,912 | 650,848 | 485,026
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 690,466 | 658,934 | 730,988 | 695,152 | 518,386 | 509,242 | 565,210 | 518,496 | 428,893 | 353,262
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 239,481 | 258,448 | 261,471 | 158,597 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Oregon Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Oregon Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.60   | 0.88   | 0.60   | 0.51   | 0.60   | 1.15   | 1.03  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.33   | 1.55   | 0.98   | 1.45   | 1.62   | 1.50   | 1.21   | 1.48   | 1.75   | 1.58  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.47   | 0.80   | 0.89   | 1.24   | 1.11   | 1.18   | 1.07   | 1.13   | 1.17   | 1.27  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.12   | 1.32   | 1.09   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-10835.

#### Cooke *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan


### October 29, 2007

134660

VANDARLYN FISH, Plaintiff,

v
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/ SC: 134660 AGC: 2645/06 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### On order of the Court, th e complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

p1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007
Clerk
#### Jose Antonio TORRES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4089

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed October 10, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Greg A. Tynan, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12356]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Public Outreach Meeting; Portland, OR

May 5, 1998
    The Office of Hydropower Licensing will hold a public Outreach 
Meeting in Portland, OR, on Tuesday, May 19, 1998. The Outreach Meeting 
is scheduled to start at 9:00 am and finish at 5:00 p.m.
    The purpose of the Outreach program is to familiarize federal, 
state, and other government agencies, Indian tribes, nongovernmental 
organizations, licensees, and other interested parties with the 
Commission's hydropower licensing program. The topics for the Outreach 
Meeting are pre-licensing, licensing, and post-licensing procedures for 
hydrolectric projects in Oregon whose licenses expire between calender 
years 2000 and 2010.
    Staff from the Commission's Office of Hydropower Licensing will 
preside over the meetings.
    The location of the Outreach Meeting is: Doubletree Hotel, 909 
North Hayden Island Drive, Portland, OR 97217, (503) 283-4466.
    Directions to Hotel: Take I-5 North to Exit #308/Jantzen Beach 
Center, You will drive by a large Safeway store to a stop light, Right 
on Hayden Island Dr., Hotel will be directly in front.
    If you plan to attend, notify John Blair, Western Outreach 
Coordinator, fax: 202-219-2152; telephone: 202-219-2845 or Theresa 
Gibson (202) 219-2793.
David P. Boergers
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12356 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21-1
To Annual Report on Form 10-K
For the year ended December 31, 2000
(Commission File No. 1-12385)

                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Subsidiaries of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.     Place of         Percent of
(Parent and Registrant)                            Incorporation    Voting Power
----------------------------------------------     -------------    ------------

NNS Delaware Management Company                    Delaware             100%

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company     Virginia             100%

Continental Maritime of San Diego, Inc.            California           100%

Naptheon Inc.                                      Delaware             100%


                                       50
No. 12-7079.

#### Fulton *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8006

AHMAD CLARENCE GARLAND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director, South Carolina

Department of Corrections; C. RUSHTON, Warden,

McCormick Correctional Institution; L.

CARTLEDGE, Associate Warden, McCormick

Correctional Institution; C. KENDALL,

Associate Warden, McCormick Correctional

Institution; S. LEWIS, Major, McCormick

Correctional Institution; I. CULBREATH, Inmate

Grievance Counselor, McCormick Correctional

Institution; GEORGE LONG, McCormick

Correctional Institution; J. REED, McCormick

Correctional Institution; RICHARD P. STROKES,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

PHILIP MORRIS, USA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-00-3024-4-19BF)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002
2

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Clarence Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,

MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ahmad Clarence Garland appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Garland v. Catoe, No. CA-00-3024-4-19BF

(D.S.C. Nov. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Mechanical Technology, Incorporated**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated (the “Company”) for the three month period ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peng K. Lim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:

 

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.           |
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |

 

 

 

|         |   |   |                    |
|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| May 12, 2008 |   |   | /S/ PENG K. LIM         |
|         |   |   | Peng K. Lim             |
|         |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**MENTOR CORPORATION**

**§302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Joshua H. Levine,certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mentor Corporation;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport, based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 7, 2005                                      /s/JOSHUA H. LEVINE                                                                            Joshua H.Levine                                                                           President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                            (Principal Executive Officer) 

----
#### 90 CWELT-2008 LLC, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. YACHT CLUB AT PORTOFINO CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0929

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 12-47813

Dismissed.
**Exhibit 15.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, CA 

Re: Registration Statement Nos. 333-62228, 333-01583 and333-125460 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 8, 2007related to our review of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not consideredpart of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

May 8, 2007