alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Working Natural Gas Total Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Working Natural Gas Total Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 4,211,193 | 4,327,844
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,410,224 | 4,483,650 | 4,576,356 | 4,748,636 | 4,785,669 | 4,800,671 | 4,815,970 | 4,851,452 | 4,840,158 | 4,822,109
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,844,737 | 4,804,849 | 4,790,969 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
128P17

#### In Re Alex Ohara King

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Tom Zapatinas hereby certifies, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the annual report on Form 10-K of Preaxia Health Care
      Payment Systems Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | information contained in the annual report on Form 10-K
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of Preaxia Health Care Payment Systems
  Inc.                         



|Date: | October 21, 2011 | By: | /s/Tom Zapatinas             
|----- | ---------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|      |                  |     | Name: Tom Zapatinas          
|      |                  |     | Title: President and Director
|      |                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 16, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ FERNANDO BOSQUE MOHÍNO
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Fernando Bosque Mohíno 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|Dated: April 16, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ SAÚL VILLARREAL GARCÍA
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Saúl Villarreal García 
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Dawn Hammond, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-AC1
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     EMC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as
     Servicer, Harborside Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Mortgage
     Corporation, USA, as Servicer, Impac Funding Corporation, as Servicer,
     PHH Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer and Waterfield Mortgage Company,
     Incorporated, as Servicer.

     Dated: Date: July 10, 2008

     /s/ Dawn Hammond
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1384 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1384

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain chemicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 5 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain chemicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN CHEMICALS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/
92'' and inserting ``12/31/96'' in each of the following headings:
            (1) Heading 9902.30.14 (relating to Neville and Winter's 
        acid).
            (2) Heading 9902.30.41 (relating to Broenner's acid).
            (3) Heading 9902.30.42 (relating to D Salt).
            (4) Heading 9902.30.60 (relating to napthol AS types).
            (5) Heading 9902.30.62 (relating to anis base).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Dennis GUYTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3296

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sa-bella, Judge.

Affirmed.
##### 



Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Six MonthsEndedJune 30,
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income from Continuing Operations
Before Taxes
    
    $
    4,486.6
    
    
    $
    6,221.4
    
    
    $
    7,363.9
    
    
    $
    7,974.5
    
    
    $
    9,051.6
    
    
    $
    9,651.7Add (Subtract):One-third of rents
    
    
    33.9
    
    
    
    67.8
    
    
    
    68.2
    
    
    
    71.9
    
    
    
    75.6
    
    
    
    67.2Interest expense, gross
    
    
    205.7
    
    
    
    375.1
    
    
    
    385.5
    
    
    
    293.7
    
    
    
    350.9
    
    
    
    390.6Interest capitalized,
net of amortization
    
    
    19.3
    
    
    
    29.4
    
    
    
    (1.0
    )
    
    
    (21.3
    )
    
    
    (30.1
    )
    
    
    (36.9
    )Equity (income) loss from affiliates,
net of distributions
    
    
    (529.1
    )
    
    
    (362.5
    )
    
    
    (615.9
    )
    
    
    (421.2
    )
    
    
    79.2
    
    
    
    (156.1
    )Preferred stock dividends, net of tax
    
    
    59.5
    
    
    
    120.0
    
    
    
    120.0
    
    
    
    151.0
    
    
    
    150.9
    
    
    
    164.3Earnings from Continuing Operations
    
    $
    4,275.9
    
    
    $
    6,451.2
    
    
    $
    7,320.7
    
    
    $
    8,048.6
    
    
    $
    9,678.1
    
    
    $
    10,080.8One-third of rents
    
    $
    33.9
    
    
    $
    67.8
    
    
    $
    68.2
    
    
    $
    71.9
    
    
    $
    75.6
    
    
    $
    67.2Interest expense, gross
    
    
    205.7
    
    
    
    375.1
    
    
    
    385.5
    
    
    
    293.7
    
    
    
    350.9
    
    
    
    390.6Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    79.8
    
    
    
    166.0
    
    
    
    166.7
    
    
    
    207.1
    
    
    
    215.6
    
    
    
    234.7Fixed Charges from Continuing
Operations
    
    $
    319.4
    
    
    $
    608.9
    
    
    $
    620.4
    
    
    $
    572.7
    
    
    $
    642.1
    
    
    $
    692.5Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
from Continuing Operations
    
    
    13
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    14
    
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    15
 Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes  an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
#### TOMLINSON et al. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 13057.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 23, 1950.

John L. Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., Stokes, Bramwell & Dassori, Washington, D. C. (Frederic D. Dassori, and John W. Stokes, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioners.

Sumner M. Redstone, Ellis N. Slack, Special Assistants to Attorney General, Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, John M. Morawski, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

When this case was submitted to, and decided by the Tax Court, the case of Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Culbertson, 337 U.S. 733, *69*S.Ct. 1210, had not been decided, and the questions arising in this case were decided and the facts determined by the Tax Court without the benefit of that decision.

We are of the opinion that before considering the petition for review of the tax Court’s decision in this case, we should have the benefit of its re-examination of the questions and its re-determination of the facts in the light of the opinion in the Culbertson case.

We, therefore, order a remand of this cause to the Tax Court for further proceedings -in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court in the Culbertson case with the right in either of the parties to offer such further or additional evidence and take such further or additional positions as may be appropriate in the light of that opinion.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 551    | 627    | 550   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,508  | 631    | 783    | 345    | 252    | 713    | 923    | 3,379  | 3,597  | 3,625 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,576  | 3,535  | 949    | 924    | 312    | 191    | 274    | 278    | 313    | 293   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 293    | 286    | 302    | 323    | 326    | 320    | 322    | 334    | 350    | 363   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 369    | 375    | 376    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
105P17

#### State v. Jimmy Reid

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal (COAP17-172)

Dismissed *ex mero motu*

Ervin, J., recused
Exhibit 10.16
 POSITIVEID ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
UNDER POSITIVEID ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION 2010 FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN
  Background Information
     Agreement
 Restricted Stock
 Vesting
 Change of Control
 Restrictions on Transfer; Legending of Shares




---



##### 



Forfeiture
 Shares Held by Custodian; Rights to Dividends and Voting Rights
 Tax Consequences.
  No Effect on Employment




---



##### 



Governing Laws
 Successors
 Severability
 Notices
  
  
 Entire Agreement
 Headings
 Additional Acknowledgements
  POSITIVEID ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATIONBy:GRANTEE:[insert name of Grantee]
TO: Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000(1) 

ATTENTION: HEARING DOCKET CLERK 

Re: In the Matter of Mary E. Bochiardy 

Docket No. 2011EA170066 

c2o1~- o~s~ 

FEB 2 0 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

Enclosed herein please fmd a copy of the response to both the request for hearing and the 

Agency's Motion to Dismiss Late-Filed Appeal, together with proof of service. 

Sincerely, 

Mary E. Bochiardy 

Representing Self 

1450 Sunset Point Road 

Clearwater, FL 33755 

TEL: 386-214-0414 
MARY E. BOCHIARDY 

REPRESENTING SELF 

1450 SUNSET POINT ROAD 

CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 

In the Matter of Mary E. Bochiardy 

2011EA170066 

cl..oto- og53 

t1.ECE!\/ED 

FEB 2 0 ~014 

HEARING OUCKET 

IN RESPONSE TO FAA NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

I am currently a resident of Pinellas county Florida and do not have the means to travel to 

Philadelphia, P A to represent myself I caunot sustain the personal and monetary loss if I am to 

miss work and find free transport to accommodate such request. I am not able to be physically on 

site in the location requested by Atty Judith Vaughan. 

I respectfully request that any such hearing take place in or near the Tampa, Florida area. 

Sincerely, 

Mary E. Bochiardy 

1450 Sunset Point Road 

Clearwater, FL 33755 

TEL: 386-214-0414
#### Jeffrey KALLAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1972

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule *3.850*motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12001089CFCXMX.

*Affirmed.*
# UnitedStates Court of A ppea ls F OR T H E D IST RIC TOF C OL U MBI A C IR C U IT

_________

___ 

### N o. 07- 5174 S ept em berTer m 2008 01cv 00731 F il ed O n : Aug ust3, 2009 El -S hifa Pha rmac euti cal Indu str iesC ompany and Salah El Di n Ahm ed Moh am me d Idris, Appel lan ts
v . Uni ted S tatesof Amer ic a, Appel lee
BE FO RE : Sen telle, Chie f Judge, an d Ginsb urg, Henderso n, Rogers, Ta tel, Gar lan d, B ro w n, G ri ff it h, an d Kav anaug h, C ircui t J udg es

O R D E R Upon conside ration of

app ellant s’ petition for rehea ring en b anc, the resp onse thereto, and t he vote i n fav or of the p eti ti on by

a maj or ity

of the j udg es eli g ibl e to participa te, it is OR DE RE D thatthe pe tition b e granted . Th e case w ill be reh eard bythe cou rt sitting en ban c. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the c our t’ s M arch 27, 2 009 j udg ment be v acat ed. It is FURTHER ORDERED tha t oral argume nt be fore the en ba nc cou rt w ill be h eard at 9: 30 a .m . on W edn esda y , Decem ber 16 , 200 9. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the p arti es submi t 20 copi es each of bri efs and t he appendi x

i n ac cordance w it h the foll ow ing sc hedul e: Br ief for Appel lan ts September 21, 2009 Appendi x September 21, 2009 Br ief for Appel lee Oct ober 21, 2009 Rep ly Br ief for Appel lan t November 4, 2009

# UnitedStates Court of A ppea ls F OR T H E D IST RIC TOF C OL U MBI A C IR C U IT

_________

___ 

### N o. 07- 5174 S ept em berTer m 2008

Pag e 2 Beca use th e brief ing schedu le is key ed to the da te of argumen t, the court w ill grantrequests for extension o f time limits o nly for extraord inarily comp elling reaso ns. Al l br iefs and app endi ces mustco ntai n the date thatthe cas e i s s chedu led for o ra l arg ument atthe top o f the c ov er . See D .C . C ir . R ule 28( a) (8 ).
Per Cu riam
FOR THE C OURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk B Y : / s / Michael C. McGrail Depu ty Clerk