alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**RESTATED OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR2 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

 

Date:  As of March 15,2007

|   |   | /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann                                                                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name:  ThomasG. Lehmann                                                                 |
|   |   | Title:   President and Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor |
No. 12-6779.

#### Gonzalez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order filed January 12, 2012.

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00269-CV

____________

NATHANIEL JONES III, Appellant

V.

JAMIE SULLA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-41188

O R D E R

Appellant=s brief was due December 15, 2011. No brief or motion for extension of time 

has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits his brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was 

late, to the clerk of this court on or before February 10, 2012, the court will dismiss the appeal 

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 10.29

                               THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                        1997 STOCK PLAN FOR DIRECTORS OF
                         NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.


      The 1997 Stock Plan for Directors of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows, effective December 15, 1998:


      1. Section XI(a)(2) is amended to read as follows:

         (2)   Annually after such election, options to purchase 2,000 shares of
               Common Stock.


      2. Section XII(a)(1) is amended to read as follows:

         (1)  Fifty percent  (50%) of the first  $25,000 of the annual  retainer
              paid to an Eligible Director shall be paid in shares of Restricted
              Stock  within  thirty  (30) days after the  annual  meeting of the
              shareholders  of the Company,  subject to the conditions set forth
              below. Any annual retainer amount in excess of $25,000 may be paid
              in either Restricted Stock or cash, in such proportion as shall be
              determined  by the  Committee.  The number of shares of Restricted
              Stock issued under this subsection shall be calculated by dividing
              the applicable retainer amount by the Fair Market Value of a share
              of Common Stock on the annual  meeting date,  with any  fractional
              shares paid in cash.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is hereby executed this _____ day of
December, 1998.


                                    NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.


                                    By: ________________________________
                                          Senior Vice President



ATTEST: ____________________
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GALE C. HUTCHINSON, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

FARMERS INSURANCE, FREDIE J. 

WORTHEY A/K/A FRED J. 

WORTHEY, FRED WORTHEY 

INSURANCE AGENCY, JUSTIN 

JAMES WORTHEY, WIA AND 

ASSOCIATES, LLC, BRENDA 

WORTHEY, AND LISA SMITH,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00140-CV

Appeal from the

191st District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# DC-14-07429)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court to determine whether it has jurisdiction. Finding that the 

orders sought to be appealed are not subject to an interlocutory appeal, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. 

It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and 

interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corporation, 39 S.W.3d 

191, 195 (Tex. 2001); TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. § 51.014 (West 2015)(authorizing 

appeals from certain interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending 

parties and claims. See Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. 

The notice of appeal states that Appellant, Gale C. Hutchinson, Jr., is appealing the trial 
- 2 -

court’s orders (1) denying his motion for continuance, (2) granting Appellee Farmers Insurance 

Exchange’s motion to strike and for judgment, and (3) granting the special exceptions of 

defendants Fredie Worthey, Fred J. Worthey, Fred Worthey Insurance Agency, WIA and 

Associates, LLC, Lisa Smith, and Brenda Worthey, and ordering Appellant to replead. The Fifth

Court of Appeals, prior to transferring the appeal to this Court pursuant to a docket equalization 

order, sent Appellant a letter notifying him that the clerk’s record did not contain a final 

judgment or appealable order and asking him to file a response explaining how the court of 

appeals has jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3. Appellant and Appellee 

Farmers Insurance Exchange have filed responses to the Fifth Court of Appeals’ letter.

The record does not reflect that the trial court has entered a final judgment and Appellant 

does not suggest otherwise. The orders Appellant seeks to appeal are interlocutory but there is 

no statutory authority for an interlocutory appeal of any of the orders. Accordingly, we dismiss 

the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

May 13, 2015

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Darnell Ramajita Adkins v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00627

- CR

Trial court case number: 1362336

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

The “Agreed Motion to Substitute Counsel” filed by appellant’s counsel does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 because it does not indicate that the motion was delivered to appellant. See T EX

. R. A P P

. P. 6.5(b) (stating, “The motion must be delivered to the party―both by certified and by first

- class mail―to the party at the party’s last known address”); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(d) (providing that motion for substitution of counsel must comply with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5(b)). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to STRIKE the motion. We ORDER counsel to file a motion for substitution of counsel that complies with Rule 6.5 no later 7 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signa ture: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

Acting individually

Date: August 5, 2013
No. 12-313.

#### Citigroup Global Markets Inc., dba Smith Barney *v.*StoneMor Operating LLC et al.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Famous Uncle Als Hot Dogs & Grille, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Paul Esposito, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   Paul Esposito

Paul Esposito

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer



March 15, 2009
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|North Dakota Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|North Dakota Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         | 5,422  | 5,930  | 6,320  | 5,246  | 5,952  | 5,335   | 4,674  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,942   | 4,852   | 4,675   | 4,563  | 4,278  | 4,093  | 3,860  | 3,897  | 4,234   | 4,462  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,598   | 4,712   | 4,610   | 4,448  | 4,754  | 5,250  | 5,560  | 5,647  | 6,184   | 7,852  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8,842   | 10,199  | 19,186  | 26,000 | 36,276 | 71,232 | 85,227 | 92,505 | 100,815 | 115,406
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 118,520 | 142,878 | 151,747 |        |        |        |        |        |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Unassociated Document



EXHIBIT 10.3




 


AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE NOTE







The undersigned parties, MSF International, Inc. (“Creditor”) and Minerco Resources Inc. (“Maker”), have previously entered into a convertible note (“the Note”) in the amount of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), dated October 12, 2010 herein to amend the terms of such debenture as follows:







WHEREAS, the Note was due on demand; and







WHEREAS, the Creditor has only received partial payment and has only been able to utilize the convertibility clause in the Note on $26,400 of the $100,000 due and owing due to adverse market conditions for the Maker’s stock including insufficient authorized common stock, and volatile stock prices; and







WHEREAS, there is a remaining balance of $73,600 due on the convertible note; and







WHEREAS, the Maker has the ability to issue free-trading stock to the Creditor on the conversion of the debenture, subject to Rule 144, and







WHEREAS, the Parties agree to amend the terms of the original Note.







NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Section “Conversion Price” shall be modified as follows:







“Conversion Price” shall be $0.001 or 50% of the lowest Per Share Market Value of the five (5) Trading Days immediately preceding a Conversion Date, whichever is lowest.







Agreed this 20th Day of February, 2012.


 


 




	CREDITOR 	 	 	MAKER	 
	
 

	 	 	


	 
	By: Marco Mena, General Manager 	 	 	
By:  Sam J Messina III

	 
	
MSF International, Inc. 

	 	 	
Minerco Resources Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25527-25528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. STN 50-456, STN 50-457; STN 50-454, STN 50-455; 50-237, 
50-249; 50-373, 50-374; 50-254, 50-265; And 50-295, 50-304 License Nos. 
NPF-72, NPF-77; NPF-37, NPF-66; DPR-19, DPR-25; NPF-11, NPF-18; DRP-29, 
DPR-30; And DPR-39, DPR-48]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Receipt of Petition for Director's 
Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by Petition dated March 25, 1998, the 
National Whistleblower Legal Defense and Education Fund and Mr. Randy 
Robarge (the Petitioners) have requested that the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) take immediate corrective action and 
imposition of civil penalties against Commonwealth Edison Company 
(ComEd).
    As grounds for their request, the Petitioners assert that (1) 
ComEd's assertion in a pleading in a case before the U.S. Department of 
Labor, 98-ERA-2, that the filing of a ``Problem Identification Form'' 
(PIF) does not constitute protected activity fosters an atmosphere of 
intimidation and chills

[[Page 25528]]

the reporting of safety concerns in violation of 10 CFR 50.7, and (2) 
ComEd intentionally imposed ``restrictive confidentiality'' aimed at 
prohibiting employees from providing information to the NRC in 
violation of 10 CFR 50.7.
    The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the 
Commission's regulations. The Petition has been referred to the 
Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. The Petitioners' 
request for immediate action was denied by letter dated April 29, 1998.
    A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, 
DC 20003-1527.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of April 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Samuel J. Collins,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-12276 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  June 4, 2010 |   | /s/ Gary J. Morgan                                |
|--------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   | Gary J. Morgan                                    |
|                           |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
No. 12-6761.

#### Woodard *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-173.

#### Djadjou *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Amendment No. 1 to the Aircell Holdings Inc. Stock Option Plan



 Exhibit 10.3.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 AIRCELL HOLDINGS INC. STOCK OPTION PLAN

 AMENDMENT No. 1 (this “Amendment”), dated as of September 29, 2010, to the Stock Option Plan (the
“Plan”) of Aircell Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), effective as of June 2, 2010. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.

 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company wishes to amend the Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock available for grant thereunder and has approved resolutions authorizing such
amendment subject to approval of the Company’s stockholders; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with
Section 3.2 of the Plan, the requisite stockholders have executed written consents authorizing this Amendment. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 Section 1. Amendment. Section 1.5 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the number “25,477”
in the second line thereof with the number “27,477”. 
 Section 2. No Other Amendment. Except as expressly set forth
herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or agreements contained in the Plan, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects
and shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed as of
the date first written above by its respective officers thereunto duly authorized. 
  

			
	 AIRCELL HOLDINGS INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Michael J. Small

		 	Michael J. Small
		 	 Title:    President and CEO
Consumer Subgroup Analysis

James E. McMahon

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov)

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

DOE Workshop on Standards

for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and

Heat Pumps

September 12, 2001

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02KK

Consumer Subgroup Analysis 

James E. McMahon 

(JEMcMahon@LBL.gov) 

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 

DOE Workshop on Standards 

for Commercial Unitary Air Conditioners and 

Heat Pumps 

September 12, 2001 
Excerpt from "Principles for the

Analysis of Impacts on Consumers"

,,m. ; m.ffF:?.:..;.'> *'- "

"The Department will use regional analysis and

sensitivity analysis tools, as appropriate, to

evaluate the potential distribution of impacts of

candidate standards levels on consumers. The

Department will consider impacts on significant

segments of society in determining standards

levels. Where there are significant negative

impacts on identifiable subgroups, DOE will

consider the efficacy of voluntary approaches as a

means to achieve potential energy savings."

Appendix A to Subpart C of Part 430, Code of Federal Regulations;

61 FR 36981, 86-871 (July 15, 1996)

III.F.I

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02KK

'Excerpt from "Principles for the 

Analysis of Impacts on Consumers" 

• "The Department will use regional analysis and 

sensitiyity analysis tools, as appropriate, to 

evaluate the potential distribution of impacts of 

candidate standards levels on consumers. The , 

Department'will consider impacts on significant 

segments of society in determining standards 

levels. Where there are significant negative 

,. impacts on identifiable subgroups, DOE will 

consider the efficacy of voluntary approaches as a 

means to achieve potential energy savings." , 

Appendix A to Subpart C of Part 430, Code of Federal Regulations; 

61 FR 36981,86-871 (July 15, 1996) 

III.F.1 
LCC Subgroup Analysis:

COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS: where

disproportionate impacts from standards

may occur, some subgroups may be

analyzed.

What subgroups should be considered for

commercial unitary air conditioners and

heat pumps? (e.g., owner-occupant, tenantleased, public sector etc.)

III.F.2

EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 02KK

LCC Subgroup Analysis: 

• COM·M·ERCIAL PRODUCTS: where I 

disproportionate impacts from standards 

may occur, some subgroups may be 

analyzed .. 

I e. What subgroups should be considered for 

commercial unitary air conditioners and 

heat pumps? (e.g., owner-occupant, tenantleased, public sector etc.) 

III.F.2
No. 12-446.

#### Curtis Circulation Co. et al. *v.*Anderson News, L. L. C., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Amendment 2012-1 
 to the 

CSS Industries, Inc. Change of Control 
 Severance Pay Plan for Executive Management 
 WHEREAS, CSS
Industries, Inc. (the “Company” or “CSS”) maintains the CSS Industries, Inc. Change of Control Severance Pay Plan for Executive Management (the “COC Plan”) for the benefit of certain of its
executives, as specified in the COC Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the COC Plan was adopted for and on behalf of the Company on
May 27, 2009 by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”); 

WHEREAS, the Committee has authority to cause the COC Plan to be amended from time to time; and 

WHEREAS, the Committee has determined to amend the COC Plan to provide that any employee of CSS who has the title of Vice
President of CSS and who also has the title of Executive Vice President of Berwick Offray LLC is eligible to receive benefits under the COC Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the foregoing, effective as of March 20, 2012, the COC Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	The definition of “Executive Management Employee” set forth in the “Definitions” section of the COC Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety
as follows: 

 Executive Management Employee: For purposes of this Plan, (A) any employee of
CSS who has the title of Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Information Officer or General Counsel; (B) any employee of Cleo Inc, Berwick Offray LLC, C.R. Gibson, LLC or Paper Magic Group, Inc. who has the title
of President of such entity; and (C) any employee of CSS who has the title of Vice President and who also has the title of Executive Vice President of Berwick Offray LLC. 

 

	 	2.	In all respects not amended, the COC Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, to record the adoption of this Amendment 2012-1 to the COC Plan, the Committee has caused
the execution of this instrument on this 20th day of March
2012. 
  

					
		 	CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	/s/ William G. Kiesling
		 		 	William G. Kiesling
		 		 	 Vice President – Legal and Human
Resources and General Counsel
#### Stephen GATES DC# 544620, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

Affirmed.