alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FERGUS COUNTY 

PORT AUTHORlTY 

04-08-2013 

TO: Department of Transportation 

SUBJECT: Essential Air Service Docket DOT-OST-1997-2605 

FROM: Fergus County Port Authority Board (FCPA) 

; c: i ..._,) 

712 Main Street. Suite 210 

Lewistown, Montana 59457-2561 

Board Members 

Joe Bauman, Chairperson 

Jim Chalmers Sam Weidner 

Tom McKenna Karen Kuhlmann 

Pete Peterson Teny Atkinson 

Tony Pierce Bob Steinman 

As the FCPA. Our mission is to enhance economic development in the central Montana. We are writing 

this letter of objection to the elimination of EAS in Lewistown for the following reasons. 

1. Upon hearing public input and reviewing ridership numbers, the ridership was more in line with 

EAS subsidies per rider when it flew to a major hub for connecting flights. (Denver) When the 

service provider changed in May 2011 they changed the destination to Billings, MT the numbers 

rapidly declined. Some of stated reasons from public input are dependability of current carrier. 

They overnight the aircraft in Havre, MT with no hanger to park inside. this creates obvious 

issues in winter that create cancellations of flights. We do have and the previous EAS provider 

did use our hanger to overnight the aircraft thus helping eliminate those issues. Another Issue 

voiced was the lack of correct instrumentation on aircraft to approach lewistown runway in 

below visual conditions. And our airport was closed in August 2011 for runway repair, thus 

reducing ridership numbers. 

2. Lewistown presently has no other public transportation options to or from our community. To 

' lose the last one would create many hardships on the local business that do send employee's 

outside of the area. 

3. By eliminating the EAS, you will eliminate many existing jobs at the airport. Security, airport 

operations, aircraft servicing to name a few. In a community that already is. having a difficult 

time with economic sustainability, it will be another majorimpact to us. 

4. By eliminating the EAS service. You also will limit our airport facility access to 

upkeep/modernization funding opportunities that are available to airports that do have 

operating public transportation in them thus making it extremely difficult to ever get back any 

type of air service 

5. The timing and speed you are acting on for elimination of service does not give any community 

time to attempt to correct the issue, whether by changing provider, route or marketing. 

We feel that you should allow the current provider or a different EAS provider to reestablish the route 

to Denver. Give the communities and the approved provider a period oftime. One or two years to 

market and increase ridership. 
The provider could then route the flight to overnight in a hanger facility such as Lewistown, and increase 

ridership again. Then at the end of that year or two period, reev;:.luate the ridership and see if it is more 

in line with current guidelines. 

thank you for your consideration, 

Joe Bauman, 

Chairperson 

Fergus County Port Authority
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 -0624 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KENNETH WAYNE DALY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 11, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 4 2022

04/04/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0624
#### AIM RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. Quincy WILLIAMS, Appellee.

No. 3D17-172

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

Stok Folk + Kon, Robert A. Stok, Sho-ham Segal and Jamey R. Campellone, for appellant.

Wasson & Associates,. Chartered and Annabel C. Majewski, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, EMAS and SCALES, JJ.

EMAS, J.

Appellant, AIM Recovery Services, Inc., appeals a nonfinal order vacating a default and default final judgment. We review the trial court’s order for a gross abuse of discretion, Gables Club Marina, LLC v. Gables Condo. & Club Ass’n, Inc., 948 So.2d 21 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (citing N. Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1962)), and affirm.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b) authorizes entry of a default by the court, but where the party has filed or served any document in the action,1 “that party must be served with notice of the application for default.” In the instant case, Williams alleged in his motion to vacate that the default and default final judgment were void as having been rendered without notice to him or an opportunity to be heard.2

At an evidentiary hearing on Williams’s motion to vacate, the trial court weighed the testimony, considered the other evidence presented, and concluded, inter alia, that Williams did not receive notice of the application for default or notice of the motion for default final judgment, and did not have an opportunity to be heard. These *1107determinations are supported by the record.

Because Williams established that he did not receive notice and was not provided an opportunity to be heard, the default and default final judgment were void and properly vacated. As we held in Cellular Warehouse, Inc. v. GH Cellular, LLC, 957 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) “[a] violation of the due' process guarantee of notice and an opportunity to be heard renders a judgment void.” “Notice is the first and most essential element of due process and failure to give notice of a default, when required, makes a default void.” M.W. v. SPCP Group V, LLC, 163 So.3d 518, 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). “This court has repeatedly held that a judgment entered without notice to a party is void *ab initio.”*State, Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Prinzee v. Thurmond, 721 So.2d 827, 828 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (and cases cited).

Affirmed.

1

, In response to the complaint, Williams filed a motion to dismiss.

2

. At the commencement of the action, Williams was represented by counsel; counsel subsequently withdrew and, at all times relevant to this appeal, Williams was unrepresented.
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mer Telemanagement Solutions Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eytan Bar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/Eytan Bar*
-------------
Eytan Bar
Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2006

* The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
Company's offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MentorCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10‐Q for the period endingDecember 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Adel Michael, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)        TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/S/ADEL MICHAELAdel MichaelChief Financial OfficerFebruary 13, 2004
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1216 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to convert funding for graduate 

medical education in qualified teaching health centers from direct appropriations to an authorization of appropriations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. GUTHRIE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to convert funding 

for graduate medical education in qualified teaching 

health centers from direct appropriations to an authorization of appropriations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1216 IH

1 SECTION 1. CONVERTING FUNDING FOR GRADUATE MED2 ICAL EDUCATION IN QUALIFIED TEACHING 

3 HEALTH CENTERS FROM DIRECT APPRO4 PRIATIONS TO AN AUTHORIZATION OF AP5 PROPRIATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 340H of the Public 

7 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256h), as added by section 

8 5508(c) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

9 (Public Law 111–148), is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)(2)(A), by striking ‘‘under 

11 subsection (g)’’ each place it appears and inserting 

12 ‘‘pursuant to subsection (g)’’; 

13 (2) in subsection (d)(2)(B), by striking ‘‘in sub14 section (g)’’ and inserting ‘‘pursuant to subsection 

15 (g)’’; and 

16 (3) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol17 lows: 

18 ‘‘(g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—To 

19 carry out this section, there are authorized to be appro20 priated $46,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2012 through 

21 2015.’’. 

22 (b) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

23 amounts made available by such section 340H (42 U.S.C. 

24 256h), the unobligated balance is rescinded. 

25 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—The second subpart 

26 XI of part D of title III of the Public Health Service Act 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1216 IH

1 (42 U.S.C. 256i), as added by section 10333 of the Pa2 tient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 

3 111–148), is amended— 

4 (1) by redesignating subpart XI as subpart XII; 

5 and 

6 (2) by redesignating section 340H of the Public 

7 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256i) as section 340I. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
### P r o j e ct F l i g ht S afe t y B r i e f i ng

Br ie f i ng L e a d e r / P

I C :

Br ie f i ng D ate : T im e : L o cati o n :

P ro v i de f or t he F o ll o w i ng D i s c u ss i on I t e m s :

_ a. H a z ar d s i d e n tif i e d a n d m iti g at i o n d isc u s s e d (as o u tli n e d in p la n )

_ b

. S afe t y U A S O p e rat i o n s (Gr o und )

_ c. S af e ty U A S O p e r a ti o n s ( F li gh t )

_ d

. V is u al O b s e r v e r P o s i ti o n a n d C o mm un ic a ti o n

_ e

. F li gh t Mo n i t o ri n g U n a i d e d V is u al L i n e o f S i gh t

_ f. F r e qu e n c i e s

_ g

. C om m un icati o n s

_ h

. L o st L i n k P r o c e du r e s

_ i. E me r g e n c y E v ac u a ti o n P lan

_ j. P e r m iss i o n a n d N o tif i c a ti o n w i th C o n tr o lli n g Au t h o rities( A i r / Gr o und )

_ k

. R e v i ew We a t h er C o n s i d e rati o n s

_ l. R e v i e w a pp lica b le Risk A sses s me n ts

_ m

. o t h er st a te d . E n t er t e x t b e l o w.

Br

i e f i ng A t t e n d e e s S i gna t u r e and C oncu rr en c e:

..
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26824-26825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12879]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


President's Advisory Board on Race

ACTION: President's Advisory Board on Race; Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This revises the notice of May 6, 1998 regarding the 
President's Advisory Board on Race meeting on May 19, 1998.
    The Advisory Board will meet from 10:00 a.m. until approximately 
1:00 p.m. at the Dorothy Betts Marvin Theater in the Marvin Center, 800 
21st Street, NW., Washington, DC. The agenda includes remarks from 
Attorney

[[Page 26825]]

General Janet Reno and a roundtable discussion of issues relating to 
race, crime and the administration of justice.
    The public is welcome to attend the Advisory Board meeting on a 
first-come, first-seated basis. Members of the public may also submit 
to the contact person, any time before or after the meeting, written 
statements to the Board. Written comments may be submitted by mail, 
telegram, facsimile, or electronic mail, and should contain the 
writer's name, address and commercial, government, or organizational 
affiliation, if any. The address of the President's Initiative on Race 
is 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503. The electronic mail 
address is http://www.whitehouse.gov/initiatives/OneAmerica.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments or questions regarding this 
meeting may be directed to Randy D. Ayers, (202) 395-1010, or via 
facsimiles, (202) 395-1020.

    Dated: May 11, 1998.
Randy D. Ayers,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12879 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-13-M
ex10_1.htm









Exhibit 10.1







FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION


AMENDED AND RESTATED DEFERRED COMPENSATION


AND STOCK PURCHASE PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


This First Amendment ("Amendment") to the Independent Bank Corporation Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation and Stock Purchase Plan for Nonemployee Directors (the "Plan") is adopted by Independent Bank Corporation (the "Company") with reference to the following:


 



	
  

	
A.

	
The Company adopted the Plan as of March 8, 2011.







 



	
  

	
B.

	
The Company desires to amend the Plan to allocate 350,000 additional shares of IBC Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) for issuance under the Plan and to update the contents of an Election to Participate (as defined in the Plan).







 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows effective as of March 1, 2012:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
The third sentence of Section 4 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:







 


Subject to adjustment as described below, the maximum number of shares of IBC Common Stock that may be purchased or credited under the Plan is 670,000.


 



	
  

	
2.

	
Clause (v) of Section 7 of the Plan is deleted such that Section 7 shall read as follows:







 


Contents of Election to Participate.  An Election to Participate shall be made on a form prescribed by the Plan Administrator.  The Election to Participate shall indicate the following:  (i) the participant's Plan Fees; (ii) one of the following three accounts to which the participant wishes to have his or her Plan Fees credited:  (a) the Current Stock Purchase Account, (b) the Deferred Cash Investment Account, or (c) the Deferred Stock Account; (iii) the name or names of the participant's beneficiary or beneficiaries; and (iv) if the participant elects the Deferred Stock Account or the Deferred Cash Investment Account, whether distributions are to be in a lump sum or in installments.


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is adopted as of the 1st day of March, 2012.








	  	
INDEPENDENT BANK CORPORATION


	  	  
	  	
/s/ Robert N. Shuster


	  	
By:  Robert N. Shuster


	  	
Its:  Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4369-N-02]


Announcement of OMB Approval Number

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of OMB approval number.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to announce the OMB approval 
number for the collection of information pertaining to 24 CFR part 55, 
Floodplain Management.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard H. Broun, Director, Office of Community Viability, Office of 
Community Planning and Development, Department of Housing and Urban 
Development, 451 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410-7000. For inquiry 
by phone or e-mail: contact Walter Prybyla, Deputy Director for Policy, 
Environmental Review division at (202) 708-1201, Ext. 4466 or e-mail: 
Walter__P<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d8aaa1baa1b4b998b0adbcf6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e6c677c67727f5e766b7a30797168">[email protected]</span></a>. This is not a toll-free number. Hearing or 
speech-impaired individuals may access this number via TTY by calling 
the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended), this notice advises 
that OMB has responded to the Department's request for approval of the 
information collection pertaining to 24 CFR part 55, Floodplain 
Management. The OMB approval number for this information collection is 
2506-0151, which expires on January 31, 2001.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
Fred Karnas,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Development.
[FR Doc. 98-12617 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-29-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00215-CV

JOHN F. DIETZ, Appellant

V.

4J ENERGY, LLC AND ENERGIA INER S. DE R.L. DE CV, Appellees

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-68508

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed December 27, 2021 dismissing appellee 

4J Energy, LLC’s (“4J Energy”) claims against John F. Dietz without prejudice. The 

appellate record reflects that when that order was signed, 4J Energy’s claim against 

appellee Energia Iner S. de R.L. de CV (“Energia”) for fraud remained pending, as 

did appellant John F. Dietz’s cross-claim against Energia for reimbursement and 

indemnification. That order is accordingly not an appealable final judgment, and the 

appellate record does not reflect that the trial court has otherwise issued an 
2

appealable final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 200 

(Tex. 2001) (“A judgment that finally disposes of all remaining parties and claims, 

based on the record in the case, is final, regardless of its language.”). The appealedfrom order also lacks any apparent basis for being immediately appealable. See 

CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011) (acknowledging the general 

rule that “interlocutory orders are not immediately appealable”).

On September 15, 2022, this court informed the parties of the apparent lack 

of jurisdiction over this appeal and warned them that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal without further notice unless any party demonstrated this court had 

jurisdiction. The parties filed no response to the letter. Accordingly, due to the lack 

of any basis for exercising jurisdiction over this appeal, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Michigan Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Michigan Working Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 660,693 | 664,486
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 664,906 | 670,473 | 671,041 | 672,808 | 672,844 | 683,567 | 683,567 | 683,549 | 681,660 | 681,660
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 681,660 | 681,660 | 681,640 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024