alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Minnesota Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Minnesota Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 872,148   | 894,380   | 911,001  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 946,107   | 970,941   | 998,201   | 1,074,631 | 1,049,263 | 1,080,009 | 1,103,709 | 1,134,019 | 1,161,423 | 1,190,190
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,222,397 | 1,249,748 | 1,282,751 | 1,308,143 | 1,338,061 | 1,364,237 | 1,401,362 | 1,401,623 | 1,413,162 | 1,423,703
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,429,681 | 1,436,063 | 1,445,824 | 1,459,134 | 1,472,663 | 1,496,790 | 1,506,297 | 1,523,997 | 1,543,581 | 1,559,872
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,582,365 | 1,602,690 | 1,624,186 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### TANN v. SMYTH.

No. 6108.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 12, 1950.

Decided June 14, 1950.

Keystone Tann, pro se.

Frederick T. Gray, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia (J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, on the brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and WYCHE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of the writ of habeas corpus to a prisoner held in custody under the judgment of a court of the state of Virginia. It does not appear that appellant has any merit in his petition or that he has exhausted his remedies under state law as required by 28 U.S. C.A. § 2254. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, *70*S.Ct. 587. The order of the court below would be affirmed, therefore, if the appeal were properly before us. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253 and must accordingly be dismissed. Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881.

Appeal dismissed.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Missouri Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Missouri Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.76   | 0.88   | 0.80   | 0.81   | 0.83   | 0.77   | 0.80  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.84   | 0.92   | 0.89   | 0.86   | 0.89   | 1.01   | 1.01   | 1.02   | 1.00   | 1.03  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.96   | 0.90   | 0.87   | 0.85   | 0.88   | 0.87   | 0.82   | 0.80   | 0.79   | 0.78  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.78   | 0.77   | 0.76   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|  |  |
|--|--|

**EXHIBIT31.1**

**§ 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, ChristopherConway, certify that:

1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Mentor Corporation;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport, based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.   Theregistrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)  Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  February 13, 2004                                               /S/CHRISTOPHERJ. CONWAY                                                                                    Christopher J.Conway                                                                                     Chief Executive Officer                                                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 12-6288.

#### White *v.*Missouri.

Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Certiorari denied.
December 3, 2012

No. 12-6568.

#### Williams *v.*Talladega Community Action Agency et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3008512-JUN-201308:40 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,268,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          51,056
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               278,998
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                67,256
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,652,887
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         244,094
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           245,355
<LOANS>                                     13,702,826
<ALLOWANCE>                                    232,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,883,399
<DEPOSITS>                                  16,171,652
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,929,467
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            272,690
<LONG-TERM>                                    344,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,153
<COMMON>                                       594,430
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,308,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              20,883,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,201,046
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              293,432
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                21,678
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,516,156
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             580,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             715,466
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          800,690
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   41,533
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,338
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                640,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                430,287
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     280,389
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   280,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                     92,868
<LOANS-PAST>                                    27,770
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 3,203
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,406
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               244,743
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   73,441
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,623
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              232,288
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           232,288
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         53,497
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Technology Transfer Act of 1986; Cooperative Research and 
Development Agreement With U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center, 
Alexandria, VA and EarthData Technologies, LLC, Hagerstown, MD

AGENCY: Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed Cooperative Research and Development 
Agreement (CRADA) negotiations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is planning to 
enter into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) 
with the U.S. Army Topographic Engineering Center, Alexandria, Virginia 
and EarthData Technologies, LLC, Hagerstown, Maryland. The purpose of 
the CRADA is to jointly research and develop a camera calibration 
methodology and capability for digital airborne cameras. Any other 
organization interested in pursuing the possibility of a CRADA for 
similar kinds of activities should contact the USGS.

ADDRESSES: Inquiries may be addressed to the Acting Chief of Research, 
U.S. Geological Survey, National Mapping Division, 500 National Center, 
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20192; Telephone (703) 
648-4643, facsimile (703) 648-4706; Internet <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4a4a4a1a6b6b1aab7abaa84b1b7a3b7eaa3abb2">``<span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b7d2d5c5c2d9c4d8d9f7c2c4d0c499d0d8c1">[email protected]</span></a>''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ernest B. Brunson, address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to meet the USGS requirement 
stipulated in the Survey Manual.

    Dated: April 20, 1998.
Richard E. Witmer,
Chief, National Mapping Division.
[FR Doc. 98-12091 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-17-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|Connecticut Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Connecticut Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3,025  | 2,796 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,953  | 2,796  | 2,620  | 2,612  | 2,625  | 2,618  | 2,575  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,110  | 2,086  | 2,162  | 3,360  | 3,340  | 3,335  | 3,207  | 3,059  | 2,960  | 2,865 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,822  | 2,689  | 2,572  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Water 
Act

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a Consent Decree in United States v. Dennis Gerbaz, 
et al., Civil No. 89-M-554 (D. Colo.), was lodged with the United 
States District Court for the District of Colorado on April 24, 1998.
    The Consent Decree concerns alleged violations of section 301(a) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a), resulting from the defendant's 
discharge of dredge and fill material into portions of the Roaring Fork 
River without a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Under the 
Consent Decree, the settling defendant will contribute funds towards 
certain work on portions of the Roaring Fork River, in accordance with 
the Master Plan. The Master Plan establishes a river restoration and 
stabilization plan for portions of the Roaring Fork River.
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for a period of 30 days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to David J. 
Kaplan, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Environmental Defense 
Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 23986, 
Washington, DC 20026-3986, and should refer to United States v. Dennis 
Gerbaz, et al., Civil No. 89-M-554 (D. Colo.).
    The Consent Judgment may be examined at the Clerk's Office, United 
States District Court for the District of Colorado, United States Court 
House, 1929 Stout Street, Rm C-145, Denver, Colorado 80294.
Letitia J. Grishaw,
Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division.
[FR Doc. 98-11605 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
#### L.G., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D15-0572

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elijah H. Williams, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13001815DL00A. .

Affirmed.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 16.7   | 18.2   | 18.1   | 16.8   | 17.5   | 17.1  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 16.1   | 15.6   | 16.3   | 15.6   | 15.6   | 13.2   | 13.2   | 13.1   | 13.6   | 14.4  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13.8   | 13.3   | 16.1   | 18.2   | 21.7   | 23.0   | 23.9   | 27.4   | 30.6   | 34.2  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34.1   | 35.7   | 34.2   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024