alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Buffalo, NY Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Canada (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May  | Jun  | Jul  | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
|2015                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 7.65 | 7.65 | 7.65 | 7.75 |     |     |     |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit
      15.1**








As
      independent chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in the
      foregoing Form 20-F Registration Statement, Amendment No. 4 (the “Registration
      Statement”), of (i) our report, dated March 7, 2006 (except for Note 3 which is
      dated October 17, 2006), relating to (a) the consolidated financial statements
      of Dynasty Gaming, Inc., as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and (b) Note 26 of
      said financial statements, and for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004
      and
      2003 which appear in such Registration Statement, (ii) our report, dated March
      11, 2005, relating to (a) the financial statements of 9143-3250 Quebec Inc.
      as
      of December 31, 2004, and (b) Note 7 of said financial statements, and from
      inception to December 31, 2004 which appear in such Registration Statement,
      and
      (iii) our report, dated March 11, 2005, relating to the financial statements
      of
      Mahjong Systems Limited as of December 31, 2004 and (b) Note 6 of said financial
      statements, and from inception to December 31, 2004 which appear in such
      Registration Statement, and to the reference to our Firm under the caption
      “Experts” appearing in the Registration Statement.








/s/
      Horwath Appel





Horwath
      Appel




Montreal,
      Quebec


November
      22, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1458 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session 

                                S. 1458

_______________________________________________________________________

                  SENATE AMENDMENT TO HOUSE AMENDMENT
                  In the Senate of the United States,

                             August 2 (legislative day, July 20), 1994.
      Resolved, That the Senate agree to the amendment of the House of 
Representatives to the bill (S. 1458) entitled ``An Act to amend the 
Federal Aviation Act of 1958 to establish time limitations on certain 
civil actions against aircraft manufacturers, and for other purposes'' 
with the following

                  SENATE AMENDMENT TO HOUSE AMENDMENT:

            Page 4 strike out all after line 14 over to and incuding 
      line 3 on page 5 and insert:

            (3) the term ``limitation period'' means 18 years with 
        respect to general aviation aircraft and the components, 
        systems, subassemblies, and other parts of such aircraft; and

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareowners of
The May Department Stores Company:

We are aware that The May Department Stores Company, Inc. has
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (No. 333-71413, 333-71413-01, 333-11539 and 333-11539-01) and
Form S-8 (No. 33-21415, 33-98045, 33-58985, 333-00957 and
333-76227) its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 29, 2000,
which includes our report dated June 6, 2000 covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein.  Pursuant to
Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not
considered a part of the registration statement prepared or
certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

/s/Arthur Andersen LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
June 6, 2000




                                       9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                     APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                                             9,350,857
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     10,675,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         241,481
<INVENTORY>                                                       11,299,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  33,147,927
<PP&E>                                                            28,476,771
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    14,250,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    56,497,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             12,381,600
<BONDS>                                                            4,873,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                             713,862
<OTHER-SE>                                                        39,468,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      56,497,361
<SALES>                                                           14,912,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  14,912,736
<CGS>                                                              9,220,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     12,309,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    89,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    2,780,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       1,084,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       1,696,367
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                            .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            .24
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                            
|View History:                                                                                             
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Portugal  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          
|                                                                                                          
|Price of Cove Point, MD Liquefied Natural Gas Exports Price to Portugal  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                          

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug  | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | ----
|2018                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | 6.94 |     |     |     | 8.79
|2020                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |      |     |     |     |     
|2021                                                                                                                              |     |     |     |     |     | W   |     |      |     |     | W   |     
|2023                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | W   |     |     |     |      |     |     |     |     
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
2012-03-14_AEL 8K_Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1
Second Amendment to
The American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
Short-Term Performance Incentive Plan
WHEREAS, American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (the “Company”) has previously adopted the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company Short-Term Performance Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the first sentence of Paragraph A of Article VI of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
70% of any Performance Incentive Component Award and 100% of any Production Incentive Component Award will be made in cash as soon as practicable following the end of the Award Year (and, in any event, by the 15th day of the third month following the calendar year in which occurs the end of the Award Year) without interest.
AND FURTHER, the first sentence of Paragraph B of Article VI of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing “20%” with “30%”.
This Second Amendment shall be effective as of the date it is adopted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, and shall apply to all awards granted under the Plan, except that the changes to the percentages for cash and restricted stock payments of the Performance Incentive Component Awards shall be effective for awards made for fiscal years after the 2011 fiscal year.
No. 12-82.

#### Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division *v.*McGowen.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
#### Pedro GARCIA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BAUER DREDGING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 74-2478

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1975.

Mike A. Hatchell, Jack W. Flock, Tyler, Tex., Robert M. Contois, Jr., New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellant.

Scott Baldwin, Marshall, Tex., James DeAnda, William R. Edwards, J. Robert McKissick, Corpus Christi, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

The appellee filed this suit and elected to proceed under Rule 9(h), F.R.C.P. *20After a bench trial the court entered judgment for the plaintiff-appellee in the amount of $163,154.00. The appellant contends that the district court improperly applied the general safety requirements promulgated by the Corps of Engineers in finding the dredge, John H. Shary, unseaworthy. In addition, the appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the district court’s damage award, and that the appellee failed to mitigate his damages by undergoing corrective surgery.

The appellee suffered a severe back injury made the basis of this suit when he slipped in the dark on a wet catwalk constructed astride the dredge’s discharge line. The discharge line and catwalk, an appurtenance of the dredge, extended from the John H. Shary for over one thousand feet and was subject to the motion of the sea.. The catwalk consisted of two planks which when laid side by side were less than two feet wide. The walkway was interrupted at intervals by connecting sections and no handrails or rope extended over these gaps in the catwalk. No non-skid material was present on any part of the walkway. The district court found the vessel unseaworthy because of its failure to provide a non-skid surface on the catwalk and because of its failure to provide a handrail or safety line between the connecting sections of the catwalk where the appellee lost his footing.

Captain Clayton Spells, superintendent of the dredging operation on which the appellee was injured, testified that the appellant followed safety regulations promulgated by the Corps of Engineers. The pertinent section of these regulations which required non-slip "surfaces to be provided on catwalks, was read into evidence. Accordingly the pertinent provisions of these regulations were properly incorporated in the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

With respect to the damage award, the record also includes sufficient evidence to support the district court’s findings. In fact, the district court’s estimation of the present reasonable cash value of appellee’s future wages was arguably modest. The testimony of physicians for both parties indicated that surgery offered no reasonable certainty of success which would permit appellee to return to work. The findings of the district court are supported by the record evidence and are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.
No. 12-6833.

#### Betancort-Salazar *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Rhode Island Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Rhode Island Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 61     | 265    | 243    | 47     | 97     | 147    | 20     | 65     | 174    | 164   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 142    | 749    | 796    | 462    | 1,156  | 857    | 850    | 1,056  | 102    | 162   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 174    | 72     | 254    | 1,290  | 971    | 850    | 390    | 1,093  | 656    | 698   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 468    | 430    | 517    | 624    | 0      | 889    | 622    | 413    | 804    | 417   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 240    | 263    | 319    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### In the Matter of Peter WW. et al., Children Alleged to be Neglected. Columbia County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Marilee YY., Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 859]

— Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Columbia County (Leaman, J), entered December 9, 2002, which adjourned in contemplation of dismissal petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be neglected.

In September 2002, the parties agreed in open court that the amended neglect petition then pending against respondent would be adjourned in contemplation of dismissal for 12 months, and respondent orally agreed to abide by various terms and conditions. Thereafter, by order entered December 9, 2002, Family Court adjourned the underlying petition in contemplation of dismissal until September 19, 2003 subject to the terms and conditions attached thereto. Respondent now appeals, contending that Family Court’s written order imposed upon her obligations far exceeding those she previously agreed to in open court.

The order from which this appeal is taken lapsed by its own terms on September 19, 2003, and counsel for petitioner has advised this Court that this matter was not restored to the trial calendar prior to that date and has in fact been dismissed. That being the case, the instant appeal is moot *(see Matter of Tanya B.,*127 AD2d 1011 [1987], *lv denied*70 NY2d 612 [1987]; *compare Matter of Gina C.,*138 AD2d 77, 83-84 [1988]).

Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
|                                                                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                 
|New Jersey Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Marketers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|New Jersey Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Marketers (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17.69  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14.87  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024