# h i ghways a n d arterial s appe n di x

# Hi ghways a n d A rterial s

**Programmed Commitments 1**  **Additional County Commitments 3**  **System Preservation 9**  Aging Infrastructure 9 

### Corridor System Management Plans **12 Express/High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lane Network**  **15**
**Arterials 17** 
**Performance Results 21**  Person Delay by Facility Type (Mixed Flow Freeways, HOV, Arterials) 21 Person Delay per Capita 22 Truck Delay by Facility Type (Highway, Arterials) 22 Non-Recurrent Delay 23 

### Appendix **26** Network Statistics 46 Trip Statistics 50 Mobility Statistics 51Highways and Arterials 

### 1 

# S outhern California’s highway and arterial system extends for 12,630 miles and serves 62 million trips each day. This roadway system is the backbone of the region’s economic well-being, and facilitates the movement of people and goods via multiple modes of transportation, including public transit, and active transportation. According to the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) Regional Travel Demand Model (RTDM), nine out of every ten trips relies either entirely or in part on the highway and arterial system. Despite the importance of the system, improvements have not kept pace with the region’s increasing population and transportation demand. As a result, the region’s traffic conges

tion has increased dramatically, leading to a less productive transportation system with negative consequences such as wasted time and fuel and poor air quality. The highway and arterial investments included in the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) attempt to address these challenges by following the integrated approach depicted in **Figu re** **1** , which calls for the region to first take care of and optimize the existing system before investing in costlier capital expansion projects. The successful preserva

tion and management of the highway and arterial system are crucial to maintaining the region’s economic vitality and quality of life. At the same time, there are critical gaps in the network that hinder access to certain parts of the region. The Plan proposes the closure of these gaps to complete the system, allowing the region’s residents to enjoy improved access to opportunities, such as jobs, education, healthcare, and recreation. This technical appendix consolidates and summarizes highway and arterial related RTP investments, including project commitments identified by the local implementing agen

cies, as well as system preservation and operations investments. Additionally, this appen

dix consolidates and summarizes the highway and arterial related performance results from SCAG’s regional travel demand model. **Figu re** **1** 

### Mobility Pyramid

**System Completion**  **and Expansion**

**Smart Land Use Demand Management / Value Pricing** 

**Maintenance and Preservation**

**System Monitoring and Evaluation Operational**  **Improvements**

PREVENTION AND SAFETY PREVENTION AND SAFETY PREVENTION AND SAFETY
**Intelligent Transportation Systems Traveler Information / Traffic Control**  **Incident Management**



# Programmed Commitments
As the short-range element of the Plan, SCAG’s Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) contains a significant number of highway and arterial improvement proj

ects that local transportation agencies will implement in the near- and mid-term. These projects close critical gaps in the system, relieve significant bottlenecks, and address inter-county travel needs, and include High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes and con

nectors, mixed-flow (or general purpose) lanes, High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes, and strategic arterial improvements. A sample of major projects in the FTIP is shown in **T a**  **b le**  **1** . A complete project list can be found in the RTP’s Project List Appendix.

### 2 Highways and Arterials

**T a**  **b le** **1** 

### Sample Major Highway Projects in the FTIP

**County Route**  **Description Completion**  **Year*** **Cost (millions)**  **HOV Lanes**
LA I-5 Add HOV lanes from the LA/OC County Line to I-605 2018 $1,242

LA I-5 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from SR-134 to SR-170 2014 $712

LA I-10 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from I-605 to Puente 2014 $200

LA I-10 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from Puente to Citrus 2018 $185

LA I-10 Add HOV lanes in each direction from Citrus to 57/210 2018 $193

LA I-405 Add northbound HOV lane from I-10 to US-101 2018 $1,034

LA I-405 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from SR-90 to I-10 2012 $190

LA SR-71 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from I-10 to SR-60 2023 $250

OR I-5 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from South of Avenida Pico to South of Avenida Vista 2020 $106

RV SR-91 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from Adams to 60/215 2018 $278

SB I-10 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from Haven to Ford 2020 $1,090 **County Route**  **Description Completion**  **Year*** **Cost (millions)**  **Toll Lanes**
LA I-10/ I-110 HOT Lanes on I-10 and I-110 2013 $123

LA/SB TBD Construct new High Desert Corridor connecting Los Angeles and San Ber

nardino Counties 2020 $5,156

RV SR-91 Convert HOV lanes to tolled express lanes and add direct connectors 2018 $1,104
**Mixed-Flow Lanes** IM SR-78 Brawley Bypass Corridor 2012 $228

OR SR-91 Add 1 eastbound mixed-flow lane from 91/55 connector to SR-241 and 1 west

bound mixed-flow lane from SR-241 to Imperial Highway 2018 $86

OR I-405 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direction from SR-73 to I-605 2023 $1,694

RV SR-91 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direc

tion at various locations from SR-241 to Pierce St 2018 $1,490

RV I-215 Add 1 southbound mixed-flow lane from Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to I-215/I-15 junction 2018 $13

RV I-215 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direction from Scott Rd to Nuevo Rd 2018 $191

SB US-395 New alignment from High Desert Cor

ridor to Farmington Rd 2018 $14

VE US-101 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direction at various locations from LA/VE County Line to Moorpark Rd 2018 $60

*Represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for the RTP modeling and regional emissions analysisHighways and Arterials 

### 3



# Additional County Commitments
Beyond the projects included in FTIP, the county transportation commissions (CTCs) have committed to pursue a number of additional projects through the year 2035 as identi

fied in voter-approved sales tax measures and other countywide transportation plans. A sample of major projects is shown in **T a**  **b le**  **2** . A complete project list can be found in the RTP’s Project List Appendix. **T a**  **b le**  **2** 

### Sample Major Highway Projects Committed by the Counties
**County Route**  **Description Completion**  **Year*** **Cost (millions)**  **HOV Lanes**
LA SR-71 Convert expressway to freeway–add 1 HOV lane and 1 mixed-flow lane 2030 $330

LA SR-14 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from Ave P-8 to Ave L 2030 $120

OR I-5 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from Avenida Pico to San Juan Creek Rd and reconfigure Avenida Pico interchange 2018 $270

OR SR-73 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from MacArthur to I-405 2035 $249

OR Various Complete continuous access conversion of the Orange County HOV system where feasible 2014 $12

SB I-15 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from RV/SB County Line to I-215 2020 $480

SB I-15 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from US-395 to SR-18/Mojave River 2020 $398

SB I-15 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from I-215 to US-395 2020 $800

SB I-215 Add 1 HOV lane in each direction from SR-210 to I-15 2030 $179

SB I-210 Add 1 mixed-flow lane and 1 HOV lane in each direction from I-215 to I-10 2020 $138
**Toll Lanes**
LA SR-710 SR-710 North Extension (tunnel) (align

ment TBD) 2030 $5,636

OR SR-91/ SR-241 Construct HOV/HOT connector from SR241 N/B to SR-91 E/B, and SR-91 W/B to SR-241 S/B 2018 $473

### 4 Highways and Arterials

**County Route**  **Description Completion**  **Year*** **Cost (millions)**  **Mixed-Flow Lanes**
IM TBD Widen and improve SR-98 or Jasper Rd to 4/6 lanes 2035 $1,170

IM SR-111 Widen and improve to a 6-lane freeway with interchanges at Heber, McCabe, and Jasper, and overpass at Chick Rd 2030 $997

LA SR-57/ SR-60 Improve the SR-57/SR-60 interchange 2030 $475

OR SR-55 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direc

tion and fix chokepoints from I-405 to SR-22 and add 1 auxiliary lane in each direction between select on/off ramps and operational improvements through project limits 2023 $343

OR SR-91 Add 1 mixed-flow lane on SR-91 eastbound from SR-57 to SR-55 and improve interchange at SR-91/SR-55 and Lakeview Ave 2023 $356

OR I-405 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direction from I-5 to SR-55 and improve merging 2023 $375

RV I-10/ SR-60 Construct new interchange 2030 $184

RV I-10 Add 1 mixed-flow lane in each direction from Monterey Ave to Dillon Rd 2030 $127

VE SR-118 Add one lane in each direction from Route 23 (New LA Ave) to Tapo Cyn Rd 2018 $506
*Represents the Plan network year for which the project was analyzed for the RTP modeling and regional emissions analysis In total, the RTP commits over $64 billion to highway investments (**T a**  **b le**  **3**).

**T a**  **b le**  **3** 

### Highway Investments

**County I**  **nvestment ($, billions)*** Imperial $1.4 Los Angeles $11.7 Orange $19.7 Riverside $8.6 San Bernardino $5.5 Ventura $0.8 Various $16.4 **Regional Total $64.2**  *Also see Goods Movement Supplemental Report for additional related improvements. Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding

**Ex h**  **ibi ts**  **1–4**depict major highway projects proposed by the CTCs in the RTP.

### 5

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **1** 

### Major HOV Projects Proposed By Counties

### 6

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **2** 

### Major Toll Projects Proposed By Counties

### 7

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **3** 

### Major Mixed-Flow Projects Proposed By Counties

### 8

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **4** 

### Major Highway Projects Proposed By CountiesHighways and Arterials 

### 9



# S ystem Preservation Aging Infrastructure Over the decades, the region has invested hundreds of billions of dollars in developing and expanding a multi-modal transportation system. As shown in **Figu res**  **2, 3,** and **4** , a significant amount of roadways and bridges have fallen into an unacceptable state of disrepair.

**Figu re** **2** 

### Total Distressed Lane Miles (2007)

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600

Los Angeles San Bernardino Rive rside Orange Ventura Imperial Major Structural Distress Minor Structural Distress Poor Ride Quality **Figu re** **3** 

### Percent Distressed Lane Miles (2007)

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

Los Angeles San Bernardino Riverside Orange Ventura Imperial Major Structural Distress Minor Structural Distress Poor Ride Quality
Source: 2007 Caltrans Pavement Survey

### 10 Highways and Arterials

**Figu re** **4** 

### State Highway Bridge Conditions in the Region

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Imperial Los Angeles Orange Riverside San Bernardino Ventura Region

Non-Deficient Deficient Source: FHWA National Bridge Inventory (NIB), 4/06/2011 update

This is a result of years of underfunding statewide preservation needs. As seen in **Figu re** **5** , these preservation needs have continued to grow over much of the past decade while funding has declined. **Figu re** **5** 

### Programmed Project Expenditures versus Need

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

2004 SHOPP 2006 SHOPP 2008 SHOPP 2010 SHOPPValue ($, Billions)

Programming Cycle
Annual Value of Programmed Projects (Capital Outlay pl us Capital Outlay Support) Annual Value of Ten-Year Need (CapitalOutlay plus Capital Outlay Support)
Source: California Transportation Commission 2009 SHOPP Plan

As shown in **Figu re** **6** , deferred maintenance leads to much costlier repairs in the future. While minor repairs to keep roadways in a state of good repair cost between $21,000 and $64,500 per lane mile, the major rehabilitation of a lane mile can cost anywhere from $550,000 to $6 million.Highways and Arterials 

### 11

**Figu re** **6** 

### Cost Effectiveness of Pavement Treatment

Good

Failed **Surface Damage**

**Minor Damage**

**Major Damage**

**Roadway:** Patching,thin overlays ($64,500 / Lane Mile) **Structural:** Fix joints and bearings ($60,000 / Bridge) **Drainage:** Minor repairs to culverts ($21,000 per Culvert / Combined)

**Roadway:** Thicker overlays ($387,000 / Lane Mile) **Structural:** Fix joints and bearings ($720,000 / Bridge) **Drainage:** Minor repairs to culverts ($115,000 per Culvert)

**Roadway:** Major Rehabilitation ($900,000 / Lane Mile) **Structural:**Major Bridge Rehabilitation ($6M / Bridge) **Drainage:** Rehabilitation due to Failure ($550,000 per Culvert)

Source: Caltrans 2007 State of the Pavement Report

As shown in **Figu res**  **7–9** , current commitments only address a quarter of total regional highway operation and protection needs, and no more than a third of total regional local streets and roads preservation needs. **Figu re** **7** 

### Regional State Highway Operations and Protection Total Needs: $67.3 b illion

**Funded $16.7**  **Gap $50.6** 

Estimated from the gap between goal-constrained and fiscally-constrained needs in the Caltrans 2011 Ten-Year SHOPP Plan

**Figu re** **8** 

### Regional Local Streets and Roads Total Needs to Maintain Current Conditions: $87.0 b illion

**Funded $30.6**  **Gap $56.4** 

Estimated from 10-year needs or cost-to-maintain estimate

### 12 Highways and Arterials

**Figu re** **9** 

### Regional Local Streets and Roads Total Needs to Bring the System to a State of Good Repair: $101.4 b illion

**Funded $30.6**  **Gap $70.8** 

Estimated from 10-year needs or cost-to-maintain estimate

As deferring maintenance will only increase this shortfall over time, preserving the region’s assets now is a critical priority of the 2012 RTP. The RTP commits $216.9 bil

lion (including $70 billion of new, reasonably available revenue) to system preservation to help achieve a state of good repair. As more funding becomes available, additional commitments may be made. These additional investments will ensure that over the next 25 years, the region’s transportation infrastructure will be in a better condition than it is today. This will also lower user costs in the future, such as vehicle maintenance costs. SCAG will continue to work with its stakeholders, particularly the CTCs and Caltrans, to prioritize funding for preservation and maintenance. 

# Corridor S ystem Management Plans
As discussed in the preceding section, the RTP identifies a comprehensive set of strate

gies that work in concert to optimize the performance of the transportation system. This set of strategies does not focus solely on expanding the system, but also considers how we operate the system; how we coordinate land use planning with transportation plan

ning; how we deal with incidents such as accidents or special events; how we provide information to the traveling public so they can make informed decisions about how, where, and when to travel; and how we maintain the system. All of these strategies are based on a foundation of comprehensive system monitoring so that we can understand how the transportation system is performing and where we need improvement. This approach is based in part on work that Caltrans has done for many years to optimize the performance of the state highway system. With the passage of Proposition 1B by California voters in November 2006, a program of funding called the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) was created to improve the state highway system. The California Transportation Commission adopted guidelines for the CMIA program that required the development of Corridor System Management Plans (CSMPs) for those projects receiving CMIA funding, to ensure that mobility improve

ments would be maintained over time. The CSMPs developed in the SCAG region are identified in **T a**  **b le**  **4** and **Ex h**  **ibi t** **5** . SCAG contributed funding towards the I-405 CSMP in Los Angeles County, as well as towards the I-210 CSMP undertaken as part of the Governor’s Go California initiative. The intention of the CSMP effort is to continually monitor system performance and identify system improvements that are lower-cost, relatively quick to implement, and less capital-intensive than major corridor widening and expansion projects. In this manner, the CSMPs provide a framework for long-term corridor management, with a focus on operational improvements.Highways and Arterials 

### 13

**T a**  **b le** **4** 

### Corridor System Management Plans in the SCAG Region

**County Route**  **Corridor Limits**

Los Angeles I-5 North I-10 to I-210 I-5 South I-710 to Orange County Line I-405 I-5 to I-110 I-210 I-5 to SR-57

Orange SR-22/I-405/I-605 SR-22: I-405 to SR-55 I-405: Los Angeles County Line to I-5 I-605: Los Angeles County Line to I-405 SR-57 Los Angeles County line to SR-22 SR-91 I-5 to Riverside County Line

Riverside & San Bernardino I-10 I-15 to SR-60
I-215 I-15 in San Bernardino County to I-15 in Riverside County SR-91 Orange County Line to I-215/SR-60
Ventura US-101 Santa Barbara County to Rice Ave/Ox

nard Notes: The I-210 CSMP was developed as part of the Go California initiative, not as part of the CMIA re

quirements. The US-101 CSMP was a joint effort between Caltrans District 5 in Santa Barbara County and District 7 which includes Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.
The CSMP development efforts began with a comprehensive assessment of corridor performance and the identification of congestion points called bottlenecks. This informa

tion was shared and verified with the stakeholders along the corridors. To address the bottlenecks, operational and minor capacity improvement projects were developed with input from stakeholders. These proposed improvements were analyzed using microsimu

lation models that were created specifically for the corridors. The potential improve

ments include ramp metering, auxiliary lanes, ramp and interchange improvements, and incident management. The results from these analyses, including recommended projects and assessment of project costs and benefits, are included in the corridor-level final reports provided at Caltrans’ web page: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/corridor-mobility/ index.html. The CSMP recommendations for new investments (above and beyond any current commitments identified in the FTIP or countywide long range plans) total approximately $840 million and are proposed for inclusion in the 2012 RTP. In addition to the improvements proposed in the CSMPs, the RTP includes $7.6 billion for Transportation System Management improvements, including extensive advanced ramp metering, enhanced incident management, bottleneck removal to improve flow (e.g. auxil

iary lanes), the expansion of the integration of our traffic signal synchronization network, and data collection to monitor system performance. The efficiencies generated by these improvements are expected to increase available freeway capacity by 5 percent.

### 14

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **5** 

### Corridor System Management Plans in the SCAG RegionHighways and Arterials 

### 15



# Express/ H igh-Occupancy Toll ( H OT) Lane N etwork
Despite concerted effort to reduce traffic congestion through years of infrastructure investment, the region’s system demands continue to exceed available capacity during peak periods. Consistent with the regional emphasis on the mobility pyramid ( **Figu re** **1)** , recent planning efforts have focused on enhanced system management including integration of pricing to better utilize existing capacity and to offer users greater travel time reliability and more travel choices. Express Lanes that are appropriately priced to reflect demand can outperform non-priced lanes in terms of throughput, especially during congested periods. Moreover, revenue generated from priced lanes can be used to deliver Express Lanes sooner and to support complementary transit investments. Based on recent analysis of critical corridors performed for the CSMPs, inter-county trips comprise more than 50 percent—suggesting the value of a regional network of Express Lanes that would seamlessly connect multiple counties. As such, the 2012 RTP includes a regional Express Lane network that would build upon the success of the 91 Express Lanes in Orange County and two demonstration projects in Los Angeles County planned for operation in late 2012. Additional efforts underway include the extension of the 91 Express Lanes to I-15 in Riverside County along with planned Express Lanes on the I-15. Also, traffic and revenue studies are proceeding for I-10 and I-15 in San Bernardino County.

**T a**  **b le** **5**and **Ex h**  **ibi t** **6**display the segments in the proposed Express Lane network. **T a**  **b le**  **5** 

### Express/HOT Lane Network **County Route**  **From To**  Los Angeles I-405 I-5 (North SF Valley) LA/OC County Line Los Angeles I-110 Adams Blvd (s/o I-10) I-405 Los Angeles I and SR-110/ Adams Blvd US-101 Los Angeles US-101 SR-110 I-10 Los Angeles I-10 US-101 I-710 Los Angeles I-10 I-710 I-605 LA, Orange SR-91 I-110 SR-55 LA, SB I-10 I-605 I-15 Orange I-405 LA/OC Line SR-55 Orange I-5 SR-73 OC/SD County Line Orange SR-73 I-405 MacArthur Riverside SR-91 OC/RV County Line I-15 Riverside I-15 Riv/SB County Line SR-74 Riverside I-15 SR-74 Riv/SD County Line San Bernardino I-10 I-15 SR-210 San Bernardino I-10 SR-210 Ford St San Bernardino I-15 SR-395 Sierra Ave San Bernardino I-15 Sierra Ave 6th St San Bernardino I-15 6th St Riv/SB County Line The Express/HOT Lane Network is assumed to be operational by 2035. Implementation plans, including corridor limits, will be refined through the Express Travel Choices Phase II Study.

### 16

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **6** 

### Express/HOT Lane NetworkHighways and Arterials 

### 17



# Arterials
The region’s local streets and roads ( **Ex h**  **ibi t** **7** ) account for over 80 percent of the total road network and carry nearly half of all total traffic. They serve different purposes in different parts of the region, often in different parts of the same city. Many streets serve as major thoroughfares or as alternate parallel routes to congested freeways. At the same time, an urban street right-of-way can account for as much as 40 percent of the total land area; streets shape the neighborhoods they pass through and often support differ

ent modes of transportation besides the automobile, including bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. **T a**  **b le**  **6**shows the amounts invested by this RTP in each county.

**T a**  **b le** **6** 

### Arterial Investments

**County I**  **nvestment ($, billions)** Imperial $1.6 Los Angeles $6.7 Orange $4.4 Riverside $6.1 San Bernardino $2.6 Ventura $0.7 **Regional Total $22.1** 
Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. The RTP contains a host of arterial projects and improvements to achieve different purposes in different areas. In fast-growing suburban and exurban parts of the region, the RTP includes roadway capacity improvements to keep pace with new developments. In all parts of the region, the RTP includes operational and technological improvements to maximize system productivity in a more cost-effective way than simply adding capacity. Such strategic improvements include spot widening, signal prioritization, driveway con

solidation and relocation, and grade separations at high-volume intersections. Finally, in a quickly growing number of areas, street improvement projects include new bicycle lanes and other design features such as lighting, landscaping, and modified roadway, parking, and sidewalk widths that work in concert to achieve both functional mobility for multiple modes of transportation, and a great sense of place.

### 18

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **7** 

### Base Year 2008 Regionally Significant Arterial System

### 19

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **8** 

### Baseline 2035 Regionally Significant Arterial System

### 20

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **9** 

### Plan 2035 Regionally Significant Arterial SystemHighways and Arterials 

### 21



# Performance Results
The RTP/SCS performance results for mobility are included in this report. A more com

plete discussion of all performance results for the RTP/SCS is contained in Chapter 5 of the main document and in the Performance Measures technical appendix. The mobility performance measure relies on the commonly used measure of delay. Delay is the difference between the actual travel time and the travel time at some pre-defined reference or “optimal” speed for each mode alternative under analysis. It is measured in vehicle-hours of delay (VHD), which can then be used to derive person hours of delay. The mobility measures used for this outcome are:

 Person Movement Delay by Facility Type (Mixed Flow, HOV, Arterials),

 Person Delay per Capita, and

 Truck delay by facility (Highway, Arterial). One additional measure for delay that is readily available for on-going monitoring, but thatcannot be readily forecast, is non-recurrent delay. Recurrent congestion is the day-today congestion that occurs because too many vehicles are on the road at the same time. Non-recurrent congestion is the congestion that is caused by accidents, weather, special events, or other atypical incidents. Non-recurrent congestion can be mitigated or reduced by improving incident management strategies. Other smart uses of technologies such as traffic signal coordination and the provision of real-time information about unexpected delays allows travelers to make better decisions about available transit or other alternatives. 

## Person Delay by Facility Type (Mixed Flow Freeways, H OV, Arterials) For the 2012–2035 RTP/SCS, this measure has been expanded to differentiate between single-occupancy vehicle (SOV) and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) delay. As shown in **Figu re**  **10** , person-hours of delay is expected to increase from Base Year to Baseline, but overall the Plan will improve on Baseline conditions by 45 percent, to conditions that are better than what is experienced today.

**Figu re**  **10** 

### Daily Person-Hours of Delay by Facility Type

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Freeway/Expressway HOV Arterial Regional AverageMillions

2008 Base Year 2035 Baseline 2035 Plan

### 22 Highways and Arterials



## Person Delay per Capita

**Figu re** **11** shows the person-hours of delay per capita for each of the six counties in the region and for the SCAG region as a whole. Normalizing delay by the number of people living in an area provides insight as to how well the region is mitigating traffic congestion in light of increasing population growth. Delay per capita is expected to grow consider

ably, particularly in the Inland Empire counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, under the Baseline conditions. However, implementation of the Plan is expected to reduce delay substantially, to below 2008 levels. The regional average delay per capita is expected to improve from over 20 minutes under the Baseline, to over 10 minutes under the Plan. Not only does this represent a 45 percent improvement over Baseline, but a 24 percent improvement over Base Year as well.

**Figu re** **11** 

### Daily Person Delay per Capita by County (Minutes)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Imperial Los Angeles Orange Riverside San Bernardino Ventura Regional Average
2008 Base Year 2035 Baseline 2035 Plan 

## Truck Delay by Facility Type ( H ighway, Arterials) This measure estimates the average daily truck delay by facility type for freeways and arterials ( **Figu re** **12** ). The Plan is estimated to reduce truck delay by approximately 40 percent over Baseline on the freeway system, and by approximately 55 percent on the arterial system.

**Figu re**  **12** 

### Daily Heavy-Duty Truck Hours of Delay

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Freeway/Expressway ArterialThousands

2008 Base Year 2035 Baseline 2035 PlanHighways and Arterials 

### 23



## N on-Recurrent Delay Data from the Caltrans Performance Measurement System (PeMS) was used to assess the level of non-recurrent delay on regional freeways using the “congestion pie” feature of PeMS. This module breaks down congestion into recurrent and non-recurrent conges

tion, with recurrent congestion being that day-to-day delay that occurs when there are simply too many vehicles on the road at the same time. Non-recurrent congestion is congestion due to other causes such as accidents, special events, or weather. The PeMS congestion pie module reports two types of recurrent congestion—“Excess Demand” and “Potential Reduction”. Excess demand is the congestion attributed to addi

tional vehicles on the road. Potential reduction also accounts for the “too many vehicles” type of congestion, but this congestion can potentially be mitigated by applying optimal operational strategies such as ramp metering. For the 2012–2035 RTP/SCS, the mobility performance measure is non-recurrent congestion. This type of congestion also has two major components—“Accidents” and “Miscellaneous”. Accident-related congestion is estimated by using the Caltrans Traffic Accident Surveillance and Analysis System (TASAS) accident locations and compar

ing that to congestion levels reported by roadway sensors. If excess congestion beyond normal is reported at a location where TASAS reports that an accident occurred, then that extra congestion is put in the accident-related congestion bucket. If congestion being reported by a sensor is above normal and there was no accident report, then that conges

tion falls into the miscellaneous bucket. The most recent PeMS congestion classification data is for the year 2009. **f igu**  **re 13**  shows the percentage of freeway congestion during a typical day (5:00 AM through 8:00 PM) for the year 2009. The data is reported for each county and for the region as a whole. In 2009, the estimated average percentage of congestion that was due to accidents or other incidents was around 45 percent. In San Bernardino County—with less congestion overall and more susceptible to incident-causing congestion—the data suggested that a majority of congestion was non-recurrent. (The actual percentage is likely exaggerated due to the manner in which PeMS handles some data; more research is needed to verify this assessment.) In the more urbanized Los Angeles County, the data reported that 40 percent of countywide congestion was non-recurrent. **Figu re**  **13** 

### Percent Non-Recurrent Congestion by County (2009)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Los Angeles Orange Riverside San Bernardino Ventura Regional Average
2009
The following maps show the projected improvement in speed between the Baseline 2035 and Plan 2035 scenarios on our highway and arterial system in the PM peak. Additional speed maps can be found in the appendix of this document

### 24

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **10** 

### Baseline 2035 to Plan 2035 Freeway Speed Changes | PM Peak

### 25

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **11** 

### Baseline 2035 vs. Plan 2035 Arterial Speed – PM Peak

### 26

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A1** 

### Base Year 2008 Number of Freeway Lanes (mixed-flow and toll) 

# Appendix

### 27

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A2** 

### Baseline 2035 Number of Freeway Lanes (mixed-flow and toll)

### 28

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A3** 

### Plan 2035 Number of Freeway Lanes (mixed-flow and toll)

### 29

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A4** 

### Base Year 2008 Freeway Speed – AM Peak

### 30

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A5** 

### Baseline 2035 Freeway Speed – AM Peak

### 31

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A6** 

### Plan 2035 Freeway Speed – AM Peak

### 32

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A7** 

### Base Year 2008 to Baseline 2035 Freeway Speed Changes – AM Peak

### 33

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A8** 

### Baseline 2035 to Plan 2035 Freeway Speed Changes – AM Peak

### 34

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A9** 

### Base Year 2008 Freeway Speed – PM Peak

### 35

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A10** 

### Baseline 2035 Freeway Speed – PM Peak

### 36

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A11** 

### Plan 2035 Freeway Speed – PM Peak

### 37

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A12** 

### Base Year 2008 to Baseline 2035 Freeway Speed Changes – PM Peak

### 38

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A13** 

### Baseline 2035 to Plan 2035 Freeway Speed Changes – PM Peak

### 39

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A14** 

### Base Year 2008 Arterial Speed – AM Peak

### 40

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A15** 

### Baseline 2035 Arterial Speed – AM Peak

### 41

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A16** 

### Plan 2035 Arterial Speed – AM Peak

### 42

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A17** 

### Base Year 2008 Arterial Speed – PM Peak

### 43

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A18** 

### Baseline 2035 Arterial Speed – PM Peak

### 44

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A19** 

### Plan 2035 Arterial Speed – PM Peak

### 45

**Ex h**  **ibi t** **A20** 

### Baseline 2035 to Plan 2035 Arterial Speed Changes

### 46 Highways and Arterials



## N etwork Statistics

**T a**  **b le** **A1** 

### Centerline Miles Summary
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 1,743 1,757 1,761 Los Angeles 7,821 7,889 8,024 Orange 2,123 2,163 2,217 Riverside 3,423 3,496 3,758 San Bernardino 5,550 5,585 5,934 Ventura 1,032 1,050 1,059 **Region 21,693**  **21,939 22,753**  Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

**T a**  **b le** **A2** 

### Lane Miles Summary (PM Peak Network)
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 3,912 3,966 4,071 Los Angeles 26,716 27,026 27,953 Orange 8,777 9,162 10,126 Riverside 9,845 10,171 12,537 San Bernardino 14,696 14,992 17,768 Ventura 3,039 3,116 3,202 **Region 66,986**  **68,433 75,657**  Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.Highways and Arterials 

### 47

**County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM)** Riverside 1,120 3,094 San Bernardino 1,614 4,266 Ventura 360 966 Subtotal 7,297 21,222 **Collector** Imperial 1,205 2,464 Los Angeles 1,720 3,816 Orange 217 621 Riverside 1,604 3,809 San Bernardino 2,809 6,041 Ventura 314 684 Subtotal 7,870 17,434 **Freeway (HOV)** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 227 468 Orange 119 243 Riverside 37 77 San Bernardino 48 95 Ventura 0 0 Subtotal 431 883 **Total All Facilities** Imperial 1,743 3,912 Los Angeles 7,821 26,716 Orange 2,123 8,777 Riverside 3,423 9,845 San Bernardino 5,550 14,696 Ventura 1,032 3,039 **Total 21,693**  **66,986** Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. **T a**  **b le**  **A3** 

### Base Year 2008 Network Statistics **County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM) Freeway (Mixed-Flow)**  Imperial 95 379 Los Angeles 637 4,582 Orange 167 1,290 Riverside 308 1,698 San Bernardino 471 2,470 Ventura 94 503 Subtotal 1,772 10,922 **Toll** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 0 0 Orange 61 322 Riverside 0 1 San Bernardino 0 0 Ventura 0 0 Subtotal 61 322 **Major Arterial** Imperial 111 400 Los Angeles 2,268 8,775 Orange 657 3,150 Riverside 354 1,167 San Bernardino 608 1,824 Ventura 264 886 Subtotal 4,262 16,203 **Minor Arterial** Imperial 333 669 Los Angeles 2,968 9,075 Orange 902 3,152

### 48 Highways and Arterials

**County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM)** Riverside 1,137 3,200 San Bernardino 1,620 4,372 Ventura 369 993 Subtotal 7,332 21,526 **Collector** Imperial 1,205 2,465 Los Angeles 1,724 3,840 Orange 222 633 Riverside 1,645 3,940 San Bernardino 2,825 6,106 Ventura 318 695 Subtotal 7,939 17,679 **Freeway (HOV)** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 288 588 Orange 121 255 Riverside 49 102 San Bernardino 57 115 Ventura 4 8 Subtotal 520 1,067 **Total All Facilities** Imperial 1,757 3,966 Los Angeles 7,889 27,026 Orange 2,163 9,162 Riverside 3,496 10,171 San Bernardino 5,585 14,992 Ventura 1,050 3,116 **Total 21,939**  **68,433** Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding. **T a**  **b le**  **A4** 

### Baseline 2035 Network Statistics **County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM) Freeway (Mixed-Flow)**  Imperial 95 380 Los Angeles 638 4,611 Orange 167 1,326 Riverside 310 1,726 San Bernardino 472 2,505 Ventura 94 528 Subtotal 1,776 11,077 **Toll** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 0 0 Orange 76 550 Riverside 0 1 San Bernardino 0 0 Ventura 0 0 Subtotal 76 551 **Major Arterial** Imperial 123 451 Los Angeles 2,271 8,870 Orange 672 3,224 Riverside 355 1,204 San Bernardino 611 1,893 Ventura 265 892 Subtotal 4,296 16,534 **Minor Arterial** Imperial 333 669 Los Angeles 2,969 9,118 Orange 905 3,174Highways and Arterials 

### 49

**T a**  **b le** **A5** 

### Plan 2035 Network Statistics **County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM) Freeway (Mixed-Flow)**  Imperial 102 418 Los Angeles 639 4,682 Orange 167 1,437 Riverside 314 1,964 San Bernardino 504 2,741 Ventura 95 554 Subtotal 1,820 11,795 **Toll (incl. HOT & Truck)** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 191 671 Orange 126 705 Riverside 72 236 San Bernardino 78 243 Ventura 0 0 Subtotal 466 1,854 **Major Arterial** Imperial 121 460 Los Angeles 2,327 9,250 Orange 682 3,549 Riverside 429 1,606 San Bernardino 625 2,445 Ventura 271 927 Subtotal 4,455 18,236 **Minor Arterial** Imperial 333 728 Los Angeles 2,969 9,158 Orange 925 3,544 **County Centerline Miles**  **Lane Miles (PM)** Riverside 1,186 4,012 San Bernardino 1,690 5,247 Ventura 371 1,019 Subtotal 7,473 23,708 **Collector** Imperial 1,205 2,465 Los Angeles 1,694 3,778 Orange 229 701 Riverside 1,706 4,617 San Bernardino 2,954 6,926 Ventura 318 695 Subtotal 8,106 19,182 **Freeway (HOV)** Imperial 0 0 Los Angeles 204 413 Orange 89 191 Riverside 52 103 San Bernardino 83 166 Ventura 4 8 Subtotal 432 881 **Total All Facilities** Imperial 1,761 4,071 Los Angeles 8,024 27,953 Orange 2,217 10,126 Riverside 3,758 12,537 San Bernardino 5,934 17,768 Ventura 1,050 3,202 **Total 22,753**  **75,657** Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

### 50 Highways and Arterials



## Trip Statistics

**T a**  **b le** **A6** 

### Total Person Trips By County
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 466,000 888,000 860,000 Los Angeles 34,224,000 38,429,000 37,406,000 Orange 11,341,000 12,220,000 12,003,000 Riverside 6,707,000 11,166,000 10,527,000 San Bernardino 6,578,000 9,089,000 8,917,000 Ventura 2,844,000 3,294,000 3,192,000 **Region 62,159,000**  **75,086,000 72,906,000** 
Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

**T a**  **b le** **A7** 

### Average Vehicle Occupancy for Home Based Work Trips
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 1.09 1.09 1.10 Los Angeles 1.08 1.10 1.09 Orange 1.08 1.09 1.09 Riverside 1.09 1.10 1.10 San Bernardino 1.09 1.10 1.10 Ventura 1.07 1.08 1.08 **Region 1.08**  **1.10 1.09**  **T a**  **b le**  **A8** 

### Average Vehicle Occupancy for All Trips
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 1.40 1.38 1.40 Los Angeles 1.42 1.45 1.46 Orange 1.41 1.43 1.45 Riverside 1.47 1.44 1.47 San Bernardino 1.46 1.45 1.48 Ventura 1.41 1.42 1.43 **Region 1.43**  **1.44 1.46** 

**T a**  **b le**  **A9** 

### Median Home Based Work Trip Length (miles)
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 4.60 3.56 3.95 Los Angeles 9.58 9.78 9.57 Orange 8.63 8.55 8.67 Riverside 11.50 10.20 10.02 San Bernardino 10.35 9.40 10.34 Ventura 9.51 9.31 8.85 **Region 9.51**  **9.43 9.42** Highways and Arterials 

### 51

**T a**  **b le** **A10** 

### Median Non-Work Trip Length (miles)
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 1.54 1.55 1.50 Los Angeles 3.11 3.02 2.97 Orange 3.31 3.23 3.31 Riverside 2.96 2.62 2.70 San Bernardino 3.04 2.85 3.14 Ventura 2.32 2.30 2.17 **Region 3.05**  **2.88 2.92** 



## Mobility Statistics

**T a**  **b le** **A11** 

### Average Daily Delay Per Capita (minutes)
**County B**  **ase Year 2008 B**  **aseline 2035 Plan 2035**  Imperial 1.5 6.7 3.3 Los Angeles 20.7 23.5 15.5 Orange 16.6 16.8 10.8 Riverside 12.0 32.0 10.2 San Bernardino 10.9 27.8 12.4 Ventura 11.9 16.5 8.1 **Region 17.3**  **23.8 13.1** 

### 52 Highways and Arterials

**T a**  **b le** **A12** 

### Base Year 2008 Daily VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by County and Time Period
**VMT (thousands)**  **VHT (thousands)**  **Delay (thousands)**  **Speed (MPH)**  **Total (Auto + Truck) County**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Imperial 828 126 16 2 * * 50.3 61.7 955 19 * 51.5 Los Angeles 45,064 1,862 1,629 59 577 23 27.7 31.5 46,926 1,688 599 27.8 Orange 15,674 518 498 15 150 5 31.5 34.7 16,192 513 155 31.6 Riverside 10,725 834 301 17 83 4 35.6 48.1 11,559 318 87 36.3 San Bernardino 11,183 1,101 299 24 73 6 37.4 46.5 12,284 323 79 38.1 Ventura 4,037 149 116 4 30 1 34.7 40.5 4,186 120 31 34.9 **Region Total 87,511**  **4,590 2,860**  **121 912**  **39 30.6**  **38.0 92,101**  **2,981 951**  **30.9 PM Peak**  Imperial 1,295 143 26 2 1 * 49.7 61.8 1,437 28 1 50.7 Los Angeles 72,987 2,211 3,224 83 1,464 39 22.6 26.6 75,198 3,307 1,503 22.7 Orange 25,053 580 929 19 358 8 27.0 30.5 25,633 948 366 27.0 Riverside 16,939 953 513 21 163 6 33.0 45.7 17,892 534 169 33.5 San Bernardino 17,601 1,263 506 29 143 9 34.8 44.0 18,864 535 152 35.3 Ventura 6,455 170 215 5 75 2 30.0 35.0 6,625 220 77 30.1 **Region Total 140,330**  **5,320 5,413**  **159 2,203**  **63 25.9**  **33.5 145,650**  **5,572 2,267**  **26.1 Daily**  Imperial 4,648 828 92 13 3 * 50.4 62.1 5,476 105 3 51.9 Los Angeles 213,447 12,189 7,310 315 2,294 85 29.2 38.8 225,636 7,624 2,379 29.6 Orange 73,925 3,400 2,222 81 568 18 33.3 42.0 77,325 2,303 586 33.6 Riverside 51,455 5,721 1,326 104 274 15 38.8 55.0 57,176 1,430 289 40.0 San Bernardino 53,488 7,108 1,319 130 231 19 40.6 54.6 60,596 1,449 250 41.8 Ventura 18,679 954 517 21 111 3 36.1 45.1 19,633 538 114 36.5 **Region Total 415,642**  **30,201 12,786**  **664 3,481**  **140 32.5**  **45.5 445,843**  **13,450 3,621**  **33.1** * Value is less than 1,000. Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.Highways and Arterials 

### 53

**T a**  **b le** **A13** 

### Base Year 2008 Daily VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by Facility Type and Time Period
**Facility Type VMT**  **(thousands) VHT**  **(thousands) Delay**  **(thousands) Speed**  **(MPH) Total (Auto + Truck)**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Freeway (MF) & Toll 39,828 3,427 1,131 81 548 32 35.2 42.5 43,255 1,211 580 35.7 Freeway (HOV) 3,361 0 92 0 44 0 36.4 N/A 3,361 92 44 36.4 Arterial 44,323 1,163 1,637 40 320 7 27.1 28.9 45,486 1,677 327 27.1 **Region Total 87,511**  **4,590 2,860**  **121 912**  **39 30.6**  **38.0 92,101**  **2,981 951**  **30.9 PM Peak**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 58,982 3,945 2,023 106 1,160 50 29.2 37.2 62,927 2,129 1,210 29.6 Freeway (HOV) 5,962 0 212 0 127 0 28.1 N/A 5,962 212 127 28.1 Arterial 75,386 1,375 3,178 53 916 14 23.7 25.9 76,761 3,231 930 23.8 **Region Total 140,330**  **5,320 5,413**  **159 2,203**  **63 25.9**  **33.5 145,650**  **5,572 2,267**  **26.1 Daily**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 193,075 23,702 4,758 453 1,935 113 40.6 52.4 216,777 5,211 2,048 41.6 Freeway (HOV) 12,050 0 347 0 174 0 34.8 N/A 12,050 347 174 34.8 Arterial 210,518 6,499 7,681 212 1,373 26 27.4 30.7 217,016 7,893 1,399 27.5 **Region Total 415,642**  **30,201 12,786**  **664 3,481**  **140 32.5**  **45.5 445,843**  **13,450 3,621**  **33.1** MF = mixed-flow or general purpose lanes, HOV = high-occupancy vehicle lanes Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

### 54 Highways and Arterials

**T a**  **b le** **A14** 

### Baseline 2035 Daily VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by County and Time Period
**County VMT**  **(thousands) VHT**  **(thousands) Delay**  **(thousands) Speed**  **(MPH) Total (Auto + Truck)**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Imperial 1,385 350 31 6 4 * 44.5 61.3 1,735 37 4 47.1 Los Angeles 49,125 3,045 1,932 100 783 42 25.4 30.4 52,170 2,032 825 25.7 Orange 16,661 772 539 21 171 7 30.9 36.8 17,434 560 178 31.1 Riverside 16,400 1,625 709 48 360 22 23.1 33.7 18,025 757 383 23.8 San Bernardino 15,244 2,305 565 67 249 31 27.0 34.3 17,549 633 279 27.7 Ventura 4,647 228 151 6 51 2 30.8 37.7 4,875 157 53 31.1 **Region Total 103,461**  **8,326 3,928**  **248 1,617**  **104 26.3**  **33.5 111,787**  **4,176 1,721**  **26.8 PM Peak**  Imperial 2,164 391 51 6 7 * 42.4 61.0 2,556 57 8 44.5 Los Angeles 78,971 3,399 3,682 132 1,776 67 21.4 25.7 82,371 3,814 1,843 21.6 Orange 26,617 860 988 26 385 10 26.9 33.5 27,478 1,014 396 27.1 Riverside 25,582 1,831 1,229 60 673 31 20.8 30.6 27,413 1,288 704 21.3 San Bernardino 24,035 2,633 972 84 461 43 24.7 31.2 26,668 1,056 504 25.3 Ventura 7,382 260 278 8 116 3 26.5 32.7 7,642 286 119 26.7 **Region Total 164,753**  **9,374 7,200**  **316 3,420**  **153 22.9**  **29.6 174,127**  **7,516 3,573**  **23.2 Daily**  Imperial 7,638 2,210 172 36 21 1 44.5 62.2 9,848 207 23 47.5 Los Angeles 234,015 18,924 8,390 497 2,891 151 27.9 38.1 252,939 8,887 3,041 28.5 Orange 78,908 5,127 2,389 116 632 27 33.0 44.1 84,035 2,505 659 33.5 Riverside 78,459 10,946 2,827 244 1,156 73 27.8 44.9 89,405 3,071 1,228 29.1 San Bernardino 74,518 14,760 2,308 319 771 91 32.3 46.2 89,278 2,628 862 34.0 Ventura 21,419 1,450 647 33 178 6 33.1 43.9 22,869 680 184 33.6 **Region Total 494,958**  **53,416 16,733**  **1,245 5,649**  **349 29.6**  **42.9 548,374**  **17,978 5,997**  **30.5** * Value is less than 1,000. Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.Highways and Arterials 

### 55

**T a**  **b le** **A15** 

### Baseline 2035 Daily VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by Facility Type and Time Period
**Facility Type VMT**  **(thousands) VHT**  **(thousands) Delay**  **(thousands) Speed**  **(MPH) Total (Auto + Truck)**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Freeway (MF) & Toll 43,445 6,340 1,507 174 874 84 28.8 36.4 49,786 1,681 958 29.6 Freeway (HOV) 5,209 0 186 0 111 0 28.0 N/A 5,209 186 111 28.0 Arterial 54,807 1,985 2,235 74 632 20 24.5 26.8 56,792 2,309 652 24.6 **Region Total 103,461**  **8,326 3,928**  **248 1,617**  **104 26.3**  **33.5 111,787**  **4,176 1,721**  **26.8 PM Peak**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 64,707 7,069 2,627 220 1,684 119 24.6 32.1 71,776 2,847 1,804 25.2 Freeway (HOV) 8,302 0 363 0 243 0 22.9 N/A 8,302 363 243 22.9 Arterial 91,744 2,305 4,209 96 1,492 34 21.8 23.9 94,049 4,306 1,526 21.8 **Region Total 164,753**  **9,374 7,200**  **316 3,420**  **153 22.9**  **29.6 174,127**  **7,516 3,573**  **23.2 Daily**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 216,129 42,904 6,026 889 2,880 279 35.9 48.3 259,033 6,915 3,159 37.5 Freeway (HOV) 19,084 0 638 0 364 0 29.9 N/A 19,084 638 364 29.9 Arterial 259,746 10,512 10,069 356 2,405 69 25.8 29.5 270,257 10,424 2,475 25.9 **Region Total 494,958**  **53,416 16,733**  **1,245 5,649**  **349 29.6**  **42.9 548,374**  **17,978 5,997**  **30.5** MF = mixed-flow or general purpose lanes, HOV = high-occupancy vehicle lanes Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.

### 56 Highways and Arterials

**T a**  **b le** **A16** 

### Plan 2035 VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by County and Time Period
**County VMT**  **(thousands) VHT**  **(thousands) Delay**  **(thousands) Speed**  **(MPH) Total (Auto + Truck)**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Imperial 1,355 345 29 6 1 * 47.4 60.5 1,700 34 2 49.6 Los Angeles 45,727 2,960 1,568 80 519 25 29.2 36.8 48,686 1,648 544 29.5 Orange 15,858 764 463 19 118 6 34.2 39.2 16,622 483 124 34.4 Riverside 15,509 1,737 420 37 103 10 36.9 46.4 17,247 458 113 37.7 San Bernardino 14,830 2,197 419 47 119 13 35.4 46.4 17,028 466 133 36.5 Ventura 4,077 231 108 5 22 1 37.6 43.6 4,308 114 23 37.9 **Region Total 97,357**  **8,234 3,007**  **196 882**  **56 32.4**  **42.1 105,591**  **3,203 938**  **33.0 PM Peak**  Imperial 2,126 387 46 6 3 * 46.3 60.5 2,513 52 3 48.0 Los Angeles 74,056 3,337 2,946 98 1,197 36 25.1 34.1 77,393 3,044 1,232 25.4 Orange 25,505 834 813 23 245 8 31.4 36.2 26,339 836 254 31.5 Riverside 25,018 1,962 729 44 208 13 34.3 44.6 26,980 773 221 34.9 San Bernardino 23,681 2,538 696 58 209 19 34.0 43.7 26,218 754 228 34.8 Ventura 6,539 292 197 7 55 2 33.2 39.4 6,832 204 57 33.5 **Region Total 156,925**  **9,350 5,427**  **237 1,916**  **78 28.9**  **39.5 166,275**  **5,664 1,995**  **29.4 Daily**  Imperial 7,534 2,191 160 36 10 1 47.0 60.9 9,725 196 11 49.6 Los Angeles 216,289 18,560 6,962 425 1,948 91 31.1 43.7 234,849 7,387 2,039 31.8 Orange 74,856 4,990 2,058 107 410 21 36.4 46.6 79,846 2,165 431 36.9 Riverside 74,851 11,474 1,912 212 359 35 39.1 54.1 86,325 2,124 394 40.6 San Bernardino 72,778 14,415 1,833 264 360 45 39.7 54.6 87,193 2,097 405 41.6 Ventura 19,089 1,498 499 32 86 4 38.2 46.9 20,588 531 90 38.7 **Region Total 465,398**  **53,127 13,424**  **1,076 3,173**  **197 34.7**  **49.4 518,525**  **14,500 3,370**  **35.8** * Value is less than 1,000. Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.Highways and Arterials 

### 57

**T a**  **b le** **A17** 

### Plan 2035 VMT, VHT, Delay, and Speed by Facility Type and Time Period
**Facility Type VMT**  **(thousands) VHT**  **(thousands) Delay**  **(thousands) Speed**  **(MPH) Total (Auto + Truck)**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **Auto Truck**  **VMT VHT**  **Delay Speed**  **AM Peak** Freeway (MF) & Toll 44,817 6,578 1,222 141 570 48 36.7 46.5 51,395 1,363 618 37.7 Freeway (HOV) 2,005 0 40 0 11 0 49.7 N/A 2,005 40 11 49.7 Arterial 50,535 1,656 1,745 54 300 9 29.0 30.4 52,191 1,799 309 29.0 **Region Total 97,357**  **8,234 3,007**  **196 882**  **56 32.4**  **42.1 105,591**  **3,203 938**  **33.0 PM Peak**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 67,313 7,493 2,068 171 1,089 64 32.6 43.8 74,806 2,239 1,153 33.4 Freeway (HOV) 4,083 0 98 0 39 0 41.6 N/A 4,083 98 39 41.6 Arterial 85,529 1,857 3,261 66 788 15 26.2 28.2 87,386 3,327 803 26.3 **Region Total 156,925**  **9,350 5,427**  **237 1,916**  **78 28.9**  **39.5 166,275**  **5,664 1,995**  **29.4 Daily**  Freeway (MF) & Toll 214,954 44,005 5,002 793 1,880 166 43.0 55.5 258,959 5,795 2,046 44.7 Freeway (HOV) 7,176 0 154 0 51 0 46.5 N/A 7,176 154 51 46.5 Arterial 243,268 9,122 8,268 283 1,242 31 29.4 32.3 252,390 8,551 1,273 29.5 **Region Total 465,398**  **53,127 13,424**  **1,076 3,173**  **197 34.7**  **49.4 518,525**  **14,500 3,370**  **35.8** MF = mixed-flow or general purpose lanes, HOV = high-occupancy vehicle lanes Numbers may not sum to total due to rounding.818 West 7th Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Phone: (213) 236-1800 Fax: (213) 236-1825 www.scag.ca.gov

please recycle 2347 2012.04.12