alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Iowa Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Iowa Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.29   | 1.33   | 1.34   | 1.29   | 1.26   | 1.27   | 1.25  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.23   | 1.26   | 1.23   | 1.31   | 1.30   | 1.46   | 1.55   | 2.12   | 2.44   | 2.67  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2.45   | 2.39   | 2.34   | 2.34   | 2.25   | 2.38   | 2.45   | 3.04   | 3.04   | 2.97  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.86   | 2.72   | 2.88   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19I0212. RISA AMY POWELL AS TRUSTEE OF FAITH FOUNDATION

TRUST v. FENN PROPERTIES.

On March 11, 2019 the trial court entered an order granting a “Motion to Begin

Partitioning Proceedings Pursuant to the Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act”

filed by the plaintiff Fenn Properties and an order denying a “Motion to Transfer

Venue” filed by one of the defendants in this case, Risa Amy Powell. The trial court

entered a certificate of immediate review of both of these orders on March 22, 2019,

and Powell filed this application for interlocutory appeal on April 1, 2019. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a partymay request interlocutory review only if the

trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review

should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional

requirement. See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2)

(209 SE2d 715) (1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within

the prescribed ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait

until the final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga.

175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973).

Here, the certificate of immediate review was entered eleven days after entry

of the orders on appeal. Although the trial court signed the certificate of immediate

review on March 21, 2019, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the

certificate is the date it was entered. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687

April 26, 2019
(204 SE2d 317) (1974). Accordingly, because the trial court did not enter the

certificate of immediate review within ten days of entry of the order at issue, we lack

jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/26/2019
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8.7   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4.0    | 7.0    | 3.5    | 1.9    | 19.1   | 18.0   | 13.1   | 18.1   | 31.3   | 37.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 21.7   | 22.4   | 27.6   | 31.9   | 31.0   | 29.7   | 29.0   | 28.5   | 29.3   | 31.0  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 34.6   | 34.6   | 34.9   | 42.1   | 32.8   | 23.9   | 23.7   | 23.4   | 23.6   | 22.4  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 23.9   | 23.9   | 19.2   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   274
<PP&E>                                             191
<DEPRECIATION>                                     157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           349
<OTHER-SE>                                        (78)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (394)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (394)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2019342EN.01004201.xml

| 10.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/42

---

Corrigendum to Publication of the amended single document following the approval of a minor amendment pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(Official Journal of the European Union C 266 of 8 August 2019)

(2019/C 342/14)

On page 8, point 3.2, ‘Peroxide value’:

for:

‘Peroxide value: not more than 0,2 meq O2/kg oil’,

read:

‘Peroxide value: not more than 15 meq O2/kg oil’.

---
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 135,131 | 133,166
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 133,683 | 135,672 | 137,639 | 139,435 | 140,264 | 141,090 | 142,505 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 137,342 | 136,843 | 143,487 | 141,047 | 141,587 | 140,144 | 137,148 | 134,277 | 120,106 | 113,680
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 113,992 | 114,506 | 115,067 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-393.

#### Martinez *v.*Georgia.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Environment Response Task Force (DERTF)

AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental 
Security).

ACTION: Notice of business meeting and hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a 
business meeting and hearing of the Defense Environmental Response Task 
Force (DERTF). The DERTF is charged with studying and providing 
findings and recommendations on environmental response actions at 
military installations being closed or realigned. This meeting is a 
follow-up to the January 27-29, 1998, meeting. The DERTF will discuss 
issues related to BRAC funding and the progress of BRAC cleanup, 
environmental actions at BRAC installations beyond remedy in place, 
institutional controls, information management, other matters related 
to cleanup at closing military installations, and the Task Force's FY98 
Report to Congress. The DERTF will also be briefed on the cleanup 
program at Glenview Naval Air Station, Illinois. The business meeting 
and hearing will be open to the public. Public witnesses desiring to 
speak before the DERTF should contact Shah Choudhury, Executive 
Secretary, and prepare a written statement that can be summarized 
orally before the DERTF at the time to be fixed for public witnesses. 
Written statements must be received by the close of business June 22, 
1998, at the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental 
Security).

DATES: July 21, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.; July 22, 1998, 8:00 a.m. 
to 8:00 p.m.; July 23, 1998, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: July 22, 1998, 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Northshore Doubletree Hotel, 9599 Skokie Blvd., Skokie, 
Illinois 60077.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Shah Choudhury, Executive 
Secretary, Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense 
(Environmental Security), 3400 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-
3400; telephone (703) 697-7475; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e5d56514b5a564d5f7e5f5d4f10514d5a10535752"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a4942455f4e42594b6a4b495b0445594e04474346">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-12324 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24770-24771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11978]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: May 12-13, 1998.

PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW, Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed. Open: 3:00-4:00 p.m. May 12.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Closed Meeting:
    1. Review and Accept Minutes of Closed Meeting.
    2. Review of Assassination Records.
    3. Other Business.
Open Meeting:
    1. Discussion of Final Report.
    2. Review and Accept Minutes of April 24 Open Meeting.

[[Page 24771]]

    3. Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen Sullivan, Press Officer, 
600 E Street, NW, Second Floor, Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 
724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
T. Jeremy Gunn,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-11978 Filed 5-1-98; 10:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald John, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 915]

—Appeal by the defen*538dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurkin-Torres, J.), rendered March 26, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions concerning the closure of the courtroom during the testimony of the “ghost” undercover police officer are not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Sanabria,*301 AD2d 307 [2002]; *People v Davis,*300 AD2d 69 [2002]; *People v Oliphant,*258 AD2d 536 [1999]; *People v Escobar,*226 AD2d 650 [1996]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are not properly before this Court, unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Florio, Smith and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian B. Obie, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of OBIE MEDIA CORPORATION;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 15, 2004
                             By: /s/ BRIAN B. OBIE
                             President
                             Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1418

  To ban the use of radar in commercial motor vehicles, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               August 6 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ban the use of radar in commercial motor vehicles, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RADAR DETECTORS; USE OR POSSESSION.

    (a) Radar Ban.--Effective 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, no driver shall use a radar detector in a commercial motor 
vehicle, or operate a commercial motor vehicle that is equipped with or 
contains any radar detector, in interstate commerce.
    (b) Motor Carrier.--No motor carrier shall require or permit a 
driver to violate subsection (a).
    (c) Violations.--Any violation of this Act shall be punishable by a 
fine not to exceed $500 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 60 
days, or both.
    (d) Definition.--For purposes of this Act:
            (1) The term ``commercial motor vehicle'' means a motor 
        vehicle used in interstate commerce to transport passengers or 
        property when the vehicle--
                    (A) has a gross vehicle weight rating or gross 
                combination weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds;
                    (B) is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, 
                including the driver; or
                    (C) is required to be placarded for hazardous 
                materials.
            (2) The term ``radar detector'' means any device that 
        detects radio microwaves used by enforcement officials to 
        measure vehicular speeds on highways for enforcement purposes.
            (3) The term ``motor carrier'' shall have the same meaning 
        as that provided for such term under section 10102 of title 49, 
        United States Code.

                                 <all>
```