alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1000 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the number of persons 

appointed to the military service academies from Puerto Rico from nominations made by the Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2011 

Mr. PIERLUISI (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, 

Mr. TOWNS, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. JACKSON LEE of 

Texas, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. BACA, Ms. BORDALLO, 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. 

SABLAN, Mr. GRIMM, and Mr. RIVERA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the 

number of persons appointed to the military service academies from Puerto Rico from nominations made by the 

Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1000 IH

1 SECTION 1. APPOINTMENTS TO MILITARY SERVICE ACAD2 EMIES FROM NOMINATIONS MADE BY THE 

3 RESIDENT COMMISSIONER FROM PUERTO 

4 RICO. 

5 (a) UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY.—Para6 graph (7) of section 4342(a) of title 10, United States 

7 Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Six’’ and inserting ‘‘Sixteen’’; 

9 and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘fifteen’’. 

11 (b) UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY.—Paragraph 

12 (7) of section 6954(a) of title 10, United States Code, is 

13 amended— 

14 (1) by striking ‘‘Six’’ and inserting ‘‘Sixteen’’; 

15 and 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘fifteen’’. 

17 (c) UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY.—Para18 graph (7) of section 9342(a) of title 10, United States 

19 Code, is amended— 

20 (1) by striking ‘‘Six’’ and inserting ‘‘Sixteen’’; 

21 and 

22 (2) by striking ‘‘five’’ and inserting ‘‘fifteen’’. 

23 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall apply with respect to the nomination of 

25 candidates for appointment to the United States Military 

26 Academy, the United States Naval Academy, and the 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1000 IH

1 United States Air Force Academy for classes entering 

2 these military service academies after the date of the en3 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 20-3710

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Daniel Gray Eagle, also known as Daniel Grey Eagle

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Central

____________ 

Submitted: October 22, 2021

Filed: January 31, 2022

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM. 

After a three-day trial, a jury convicted Daniel Gray Eagle of: (1) conspiracy 

to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable 

amount of methamphetamine; (2) possession with intent to distribute a mixture or 

substance containing a detectable amount of meth on January 22, 2018; and (3) 

possession with intent to distribute a mixture or substance containing a detectable 

amount of meth on March 1, 2018.
-2-

On appeal, Gray Eagle challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting

his conviction, arguing the witnesses were not credible. This Court reviews “the 

sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction de novo, viewing the evidence in 

the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and reversing the verdict only if no 

reasonable jury could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” 

United States v. Shelledy, 961 F.3d 1014, 1019 (8th Cir. 2020), quoting United States 

v. Ramos, 852 F.3d 747, 753 (8th Cir. 2017). “A jury’s credibility determinations 

are well-nigh unreviewable because the jury is in the best position to assess the 

credibility of witnesses and resolve inconsistent testimony.” United States v. 

Trotter, 837 F.3d 864, 868 (8th Cir. 2016), quoting United States v. Hodge, 594 F.3d 

614, 618 (8th Cir. 2010). 

After a careful review of the record, this Court concludes that the government 

produced sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The government 

presented 12 witnesses at trial, including two who sold meth to Gray Eagle, three 

who purchased it from Gray Eagle or someone to whom he had sold it, and various 

police officers who discovered it in Gray Eagle’s possession four times. Many 

witnesses corroborated one-another’s testimony. “[T]he jury was entitled to make 

credibility determinations and reject [Gray Eagle’s] theory of the case.” United 

States v. Shelabarger, 770 F.3d 714, 717 (8th Cir. 2014); see also United States v. 

Aldridge, 664 F.3d 705, 715 (8th Cir. 2011) (“The jury has the sole responsibility to 

resolve conflicts or contradictions in testimony, and credibility determinations are 

resolved in favor of the verdict.”). 

This Court affirms Gray Eagle’s conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

* * * * * * *

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
#### Gerald WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1232

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 501996CF 004502A.

*Affirmed.*
No. 12-563.

No. 12-712.

#### Loesel et al. *v.*City of Frankenmuth, Michigan; and City of Frankenmuth, Michigan *v.*Loesel et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 692 F. 3d 452.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 102,595
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 102,595 | 102,970 | 102,970 | 102,970 | 105,370 | 105,370 | 105,427 | 121,527 | 124,827 | 147,827
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 153,227 | 149,789 | 149,789 | 149,789 | 149,659 | 147,969 | 147,662 | 147,800 | 147,100 | 147,100
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 147,100 | 147,100 | 147,100 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000066029
<NAME> MIDLAND ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                       665
<INVENTORY>                                      7,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,963
<PP&E>                                         626,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                 329,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,338
<BONDS>                                        133,469
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,960
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,145
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,604
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,425
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,525
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
083P17

#### State v. Thomas Stout, Jr.

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Writ of Prohibition

Denied 03/14/2017
121P17

#### State v. Manuel Enrique Santana, Jr.

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-691)

Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 90 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.90
                                         Agreed to July 26, 2012        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. POCKET VERSION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

    (a) In General.--The 25th edition of the pocket version of the 
United States Constitution shall be printed as a House document under 
the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing.
    (b) Additional Copies.--In addition to the usual number, there 
shall be printed the lesser of--
        (1) 235,500 copies of the document, of which 220,500 copies 
    shall be for the use of the House of Representatives, 10,000 copies 
    shall be for the use of the Senate, and 5,000 copies shall be for 
    the use of the Joint Committee on Printing; or
        (2) such number of copies of the document as does not exceed a 
    total production and printing cost of $114,849, with distribution 
    to be allocated in the same proportion as described in paragraph 
    (1), except that in no case shall the number of copies be less than 
    1 per Member of Congress.
    (c) Distribution.--The copies of the document printed for the use 
of the House and the Senate under subsection (a) shall be distributed 
in accordance with--
        (1) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
    minority member of the Committee on House Administration of the 
    House of Representatives, in the case of the copies printed for the 
    use of the House; and
        (2) a distribution plan approved by the chair and ranking 
    minority member of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
    Senate, in the case of the copies printed for the use of the 
    Senate.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                               
|View History:                                                                                      
|                                                                                                   
|District of Columbia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|District of Columbia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 78     | 1,825 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,234  | 3,181  | 3,623  | 3,215  | 3,268  | 3,177  | 3,406  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,450  | 3,556  | 3,293  | 3,327  | 3,384  | 3,363  | 3,286  | 3,222  | 3,142  | 3,110 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,061  | 2,939  | 2,798  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports (Price) From Yemen (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports (Price) From Yemen (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Year                                                                                                                              | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr  | May | Jun | Jul | Aug  | Sep  | Oct   | Nov | Dec
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | --- | --- | --- | ---- | ---- | ----- | --- | ---
|2011                                                                                                                              |     |     |     | 3.93 |     |     |     | 4.07 | 3.53 | 11.55 |     |    
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 104    | 0      | 471    | 7,886  | 1,701  | 2,055  | 2,356  | 2,145  | 1,779  | 1,741 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,178  | 2,126  | 1,076  | 3,071  | 2,565  | 2,536  | 2,663  | 2,211  | 2,417  | 2,405 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,157  | 1,564  | 1,138  | 981    | 1,094  | 668    | 2,005  | 781    | 753    | 1,803 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 704    | 931    | 3,174  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Order entered February 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00007-CR

No. 05-14-00008-CR

SENRICK WILKERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-01183-J, F10-01184-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On January 21, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

records have not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant is indigent; (2) Julie 

Doucet, who represented appellant on his motion for post-conviction DNA testing, has been 

appointed to represent appellant in these appeals; (3) there is no reporter’s record; and (4) 

counsel will prepare a designation of the documents to include in the clerk’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to list Julie Doucet as appellant’s appointed attorney of record.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s records in these appeals 

within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.
We DENY as moot appellant’s February 10, 2014 pro se motion for appointment of 

counsel. We DENY appellant’s February 10, 2014 pro se motion for a bench warrant.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; Julie Doucet; and Michael Casillas.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE