alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 13    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 13     | 12     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13     | 13    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13     | 13     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 12     | 11     | 11    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 11     | 11     | 11     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Onslow County PIC and o bservers will receive training on rules and responsibilitiesdescribed in 14 CFR 91.111, Operating Near Other Aircraft, 14 CFR 91.113, Right-ofWay Rules, cloud clearance, in-flight visibility, and the pilot controller glossary including standard ATC phraseology and communication.

The PIC will carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping requirements, in accordance with the DJI Inspire 1 operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, and battery consumptions will be logged in the aircraft records, including total flight hours, location of the area covered by the UAS.

Onslow County will hold dedicated training sessions every 90 days for PIC and observers. Since technology and regulations may change, we will review current regulations and compare them to the latest information provided from the FAA. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights the PIC will operate the UAS with appropriate distances in accordance with 14 CFR 91.119. These sessions will review the following:

1. Emergency procedures 2. Maintenance of aircraft and remotes. 3. Regulations of intended flight operations area. 4. Lost communications and lost link procedures. 5. Take-off and landing procedures. 6. Aircraft and obstacle avoidance

The PIC, within these 90 days, will have had at least 3 take-off and landings and have flown at least 4 hours to remain current with the recommend proficiency standards required of Onslow County and this model UAS. All training activity will take place in class G airspace and be conducted by at least 3 observers at any given time.
Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS LICENSED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS TORONTO · MONTREAL    Exhibit 23.1         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   The undersigned, Schwartz Levitsky Feldman llp, hereby consents to the use of our name and the use of our opinion dated July 24, 2008 on the financial statements of UOMO Media Inc., Formerly First Source Data Inc. (the Company) included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K being filed by the Company, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008.  Schwartz Levitsky Feldman  Toronto, Ontario, Canada Chartered Accountants August 13, 2008 Licensed Public Accountants  1167 Caledonia Road Toronto, Ontario M6A 2X1 Tel:  416 785 5353 Fax:  416 785 5663
Exhibit 8





COMPAÑÍA ANÓNIMA NACIONAL TELÉFONOS DE
VENEZUELA (CANTV)

AND SUBSIDIARIES



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                               |  |                        |  |                                               
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Name of subsidiary                             |  | Place of Incorporation |  | Name under which doing business (if different)
|Telecomunicaciones Movilnet, C.A.              |  | Venezuela              |  | MOVILNET                                      
|                                               |  |                       
|Compañía Anónima Venezolana de GuíasCAVEGUÍAS |  | Venezuela              |  | CAVEGUIAS                                     
|                                               |  |                       
|CANTV.NET, C.A.                                |  | Venezuela              |  | CANTV.net                                     
|                                               |  |                       
|INVERCANTV, S.A.                               |  | Venezuela              |  |                                              
|                                               |  |                       
|CANTV Finance, LTD                             |  | Grand Cayman           |  |                                              
|                                               |  |                       
|CANTV International, LTD                       |  | Grand Cayman           |  |                                              
|                                               |  |                       
|Altair, C.A.                                   |  | Venezuela              |  | 
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Cameron (Calcasieu Pass), LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Greece (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 11,058 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-7281.

#### Johnson *v.*Maes et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
256P16

#### State v. Jonathan James Newell

1. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Disclose the Past and the Present Relationships, Associations, and Ties Between Defense Attorney and Victim’s Father (COAP16-233)

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal

3. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

4. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for *Nunc Pro Tunc*Order to Correct Judicial and Procedural Act on Subject Matter Jurisdiction

5. Defs *Pro Se*Motion for a Subpoena *Duces Tecum*

6. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Grant Belated Appeal

7. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Dismiss First Degree Murder Bill of Information

8. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Plead to Lesser Degree or Offense

9. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed No Security for Costs in Criminal Appeal

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed

4. Dismissed

5. Dismissed

6. Dismissed

7. Dismissed

8. Dismissed

9. Dismissed
From: Deering, Teena M [ mailto:TDeering@semprautilities.com ]

Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 4:39 PM

To: Schoenberger, Richard (FAA); Rampulla, Thomas (FAA)

Cc: Cormier, Dallas; Asaro, Christine

Subject: Amendment approval for SDG&E

Richard and Tom,

We received our amendment a pproval today for our IE MkII Gen 3’s. This means we no longer need to go

through the 8130 process.

I appreciate all of your help and patience with us as we pursued both avenues for us to get in the air.

Thank you! Keep up all of the hard work you guys have been great!

Teena



## Teena Deering

Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Program Lead

(619) 829

- 4739

TDeering@semprautilities.com
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Sabine Pass, LA Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Finland (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 329    | 3,353  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50142

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MAURO JAIMES-ESTRADA, also known

as Mauro Estrada Jaimes,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1964-ALL

--------------------

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Mauro JaimesEstrada raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 138

To prohibit a suspension of the Act of March 3, 1931 (commonly known as 
            the ``Davis-Bacon Act'') in the State of Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 21 (legislative day, January 5), 1993

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit a suspension of the Act of March 3, 1931 (commonly known as 
            the ``Davis-Bacon Act'') in the State of Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hawaii Fair Wage Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SUSPENSION.

    Notwithstanding section 6 of the Act of March 3, 1931 (commonly 
known as the ``Davis-Bacon Act'') (49 Stat. 1011, chapter 825; 40 
U.S.C. 276a-5), the President shall not suspend the provisions of such 
Act within the State of Hawaii in response to the national emergency 
caused by Hurricane Iniki in September 1992.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT.

    The President shall by proclamation amend Proclamation No. 6491 (57 
Fed. Reg. 47,553; relating to suspension of the Act of March 3, 1931, 
within a limited geographic area in response to the national emergency 
caused by Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki) to eliminate all references to 
the State of Hawaii and Hurricane Iniki.

                                 <all>
```
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12445]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

University of Wisconsin-Madison; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-106. Applicant: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 
Madison, WI 53706-1490. Instrument: Length Controller and Force 
Transducer System, Models 308B and 403A. Manufacturer: Aurora 
Scientific, Canada. Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 5504, February 3, 
1998.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides measurement of 
the contractile force of muscle cells by mechanically deforming the 
length of the muscle fiber. The National Institutes of Health advised 
April 27, 1998 that (1) this capability is pertinent to the applicant's 
intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or 
apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument for 
the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-12445 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
August 8, 2016

Mr. Eric Andelin Sales Director, AGERpoint Inc. AGERpoint, Inc.
P.O. Box 1810 Daytona Beach

, FL 32115

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 0323

Dear Mr. Andelin :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Embarq Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
R. Hesse, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: March 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Daniel R. Hesse 
|                    |  |  |  | Daniel R. Hesse        
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
ex10_a.htm











Exhibit 10(a)







AMENDMENT NO. 1


 


TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY


2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (the “Company”) previously established the TrustCo Bank Corp NY 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to provide that shares of the Company’s common stock that have been subject to options or other awards under the Plan may not be available for re-issuance under the Plan if such options or other awards have expired or terminated, are forfeited or are otherwise not exercised in full


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company does, effective as of March 20, 2012, amend the Plan as follows:


 


Amendment


 




	 	
1. 

	
Revised Section 5. Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:













 




	 	
5. 

	
Stock Subject to Plan.









 


***


 



	 	
(b) 

	
No Reuse.









 



	
  

	
(i)

	
Shares of Stock subject to an Option that have not become outstanding shall not be available for re-issuance under the Plan if the Option shall expire or terminate without having been exercised in full (including, without limitation, cancellation and re-grant), or in the event that an Option is exercised or settled in a manner such that some or all of the shares of Stock related to the Option are not issued to the Participant (or beneficiary).







 



	
  

	
(ii)

	
If, and to the extent any Awards under the Plan are forfeited for any reason, or settled in cash in lieu of Stock or in a manner such that some or all of the shares of Stock related to the Award are not issued to the Participant (or beneficiary) (including as a result of the use of shares for tax withholding), such shares of Stock shall not be available for issuance under the Plan.







 




  





5











  






 


2.              Defined Terms. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment that are defined in the Plan, either directly or by a reference set forth in the Plan, shall have the respective meanings assigned them in the Plan except as otherwise provided in this Amendment or unless the context otherwise requires.


 


3.              References to Agreement. Upon the effectiveness of this Amendment, each reference in the Plan to “this Plan,” “hereunder,” “herein” or words of like import shall mean and be a reference to the Plan as amended hereby.


 


4.              Plan Remains in Effect. The Plan, as amended and supplemented by this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect .


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be adopted on this 20th day of March, 2012.


 




	 	
TRUSTCO BANK CORP NY

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
By: 

	/s/ Robert J. McCormick	 
	 	 	Robert J. McCormick	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 







 


 

6
No. 12-6647.

#### Robinson *v.*New York et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.