alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TORRES CONSULTING AND LAW GROUP, LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 16075

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 01905

- SPL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 18, 2018 San Francisco, California

Before: M. SMITH and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and EATON, ** Judge.

Torres Consulting and Law Group , LLC (“Torres”) appeals a summary
judgment holding that a F reedom of Information Act requ est was on behalf of a

commercial user and subject to the fe es provided for such users under 5 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** Richard K. Eaton, Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

NOV 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

§ 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) and 38 C.F.R. § 1.561(c)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

A “commercial use” requester is one who seeks the “information for a use or

purpose that furthers . . . commercial, trade, or profit interests, [including] furthering

those interests through litigation.” 38 C.F.R. § 1.561 (b)(2). Torres requested

information from the Department of Veteran Affai rs (“VA”) on behalf of its client,

the Colorado Building and Construction Trades Council (“CBCTC”)
, in order to
determine whether government contractors were complying with the Davis

- Bacon

A ct. The VA categorized Torres as a commercial use requester, beca use CBCTC

sought to further the commercial interests of its member unions. The district court

agreed, stating that, “As a representative of unions, CBCTC gains value and helps

its member[s] by removing the competition that does not comply with Davis

Bacon .”

We affirm

. The proposed use of the requested information was to submit

complaints to the Department of Labor for violations of federal wage law. The VA

did not err in classifying that use as commercial under the governing regulation.

Although Torr es argues that the VA impermissibly based its determination on

CBCTC’s identity, rather than the use to which it would put the requested

information, the record indicates that the VA’s analysis was proper. It reasoned that

CBCTC was not in a position to d isseminate information for the public benefit, and3

although it did note CBCTC’s identity and stated mission in its analysis,

consideration of a requester’s identity for the purpose of determining use is not

prohibited. The VA concluded that “[CBCTC] is in business for the benefit of its

Union members,” not “to inform the public.” Under the “commercial” definition of

§ 1.561(b)(2), the district court correctly affirmed the VA’s finding that Torres was

a commercial use requester, acting on behalf of a clien t who would use the

information to materially benefit the unions it represented.

AFFIRMED
No. 12-6802.

#### Poslof *v.*Yates, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit
(32.2)





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











The undersigned officer hereby
certifies as to the Report on Form 10-Q of Met-Pro Corporation for the fiscal
quarter ended October 31, 2008, that (i) the report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Met-Pro
Corporation.











Dated:  December
      5, 2008
            
            /s/
      Gary J. MorganGary
      J. MorganSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2997-2998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management


Closure to Collection of Petrified Wood Order Established; Folsom 
Field Office, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Establishment of petrified wood collecting closure order within 
public lands managed by the Folsom Field Office, California.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Certain described public lands administered by the Folsom 
Field Office in the vicinity of the communities of Dutch Flat and Gold 
Run are hereby closed to the collection of petrified wood. This closure 
will be in effect on all the below described public lands:

Mount Diablo Meridian, California

T. 15 N., R. 10 E.,
Section 3: Lots 4,5;
Section 4: Lot 19;
Section 9: SWSE; Lots 3,4,5,7,8,9; MS1483;
Section 16: N/2NE, SWNE.

    Totalling 320.29 acres, more or less.


[[Page 2998]]


    The following persons are exempted from the closure: Any person who 
is in possession of a valid Paleontological Collecting Permit issued by 
BLM for the subject area, or who is acting as an authorized agent of an 
institution holding such a permit.

DATES: This order is in effect and will remain in effect until amended 
or canceled.

For Further Information Contact: Deane Swickard, Manager, Folsom Field 
Office, Bureau of Land Management, 63 Natoma Street, Folsom, CA 95630; 
(916) 985-4474.

Supplementary Information: This order is necessary for protection of 
uncommon plant macrofossils having significant scientific value, a 
local resource that has been seriously depleted by unregulated 
collecting.
    Authority for Closure orders is provided under 43 CFR 8364.1. Any 
person who fails to comply with this closure or restriction order shall 
be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-7. Violations of 
this closure or restriction order are punishable by a fine not to 
exceed $100,000 and/or imprisonment not to exceed 12 months. Any 
petrified wood collected in violation of this order, shall be subject 
to seizure, forfeiture and disposal.

    Dated: January 8, 1998.
D. K. Swickard,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-1188 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
#### David B. WINDHAM, Appellant, v. FLORIDA COASTAL SCHOOL OF LAW, INC., a For-Profit Corporation, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2501

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Virginia Norton, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1105 

To ensure that Transportation Worker Identification Credentials held by 

certain maritime workers do not expire before the deadline for full 

implementation of electronic readers for such credentials or December 

31, 2014, whichever is earlier. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi (for himself, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, Mr. CUELLAR, and Mr. RICHMOND) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To ensure that Transportation Worker Identification Credentials held by certain maritime workers do not expire 

before the deadline for full implementation of electronic 

readers for such credentials or December 31, 2014, 

whichever is earlier. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transitioning With 

5 an Improved Credential Program Act’’ or the ‘‘TWIC Pro6 gram Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1105 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPIRATION OF CERTAIN TRANSPORTATION WORK2 ER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIALS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—A valid Transportation Worker 

4 Identification Credential required under part 101.514 of 

5 title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, that was issued be6 fore the date of enactment of this Act shall not expire be7 fore the earlier of— 

8 (1) the deadline for full implementation of a 

9 final rule issued by the Secretary of Homeland Secu10 rity for electronic readers designed to work with 

11 Transportation Worker Identification Credentials as 

12 an access control and security measure issued pursu13 ant to the advanced notice of proposed rulemaking 

14 published March 27, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 58), as es15 tablished by the final rule; or 

16 (2) December 31, 2014. 

17 (b) REVOCATION AUTHORITY NOT AFFECTED.—This 

18 section shall not be construed to affect the authority of 

19 the Secretary of Homeland Security to revoke a Transpor20 tation Worker Identification Credential— 

21 (1) based on information that the holder is not 

22 qualified to hold such credential; or 

23 (2) if the credential is lost, damaged, or stolen. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**
I, William D. Morton, as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MortonIndustrial Group, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morton IndustrialGroup, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors:   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
/s/ William D. Morton
DRAFT

AGENDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON A RULEMAKING TO CONSIDER

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS

FOR RESIDENTIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS

PLACE OF WORKSHOP: FORRESTAL BUILDING

1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW

ROOM 1E-245

WASHINGTON, DC 20585

TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127

TELEFAX: 202-256-4617

DATE AND TIME: TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2001

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M.

PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP

The purpose of this public workshop is to hear the views of interested

persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider

updated energy efficiency standards for residential furnaces and boilers. The

Department will consider the views presented and comments submitted in

formulating its approach in the rulemaking.

1. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTIONS

II. AGENDA REVIEW

III. RESIDENTIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS - TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION

A. Introduction

B. Market and Technology Assessment

1. Overview

2. Product Classes

3. Baseline Residential Furnaces and Boilers

4. Screening Analysis

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02BB
C. Engineering Analysis

1. Overview

2. Retail Prices, Markups, and Installation Cost

3. Electricity Consumption

D. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

E. Consumer Sub-group Analysis

F. National Energy Saving and Net Present Value Analysis

G. Manufacturer Impact Analysis

H. Employment Impact Analysis

1. Utility Impact Analysis

J. Er:vironmental Analysis

IV. ADJOURNMENT

EE-RM/STD-01-350 COMMENT 02BB
|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                                                    
|                                                                                                                                 
|Maryland Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                 
|Maryland Price of Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers by Local Distributor Companies (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 16.14  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12.20  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Dexter A. DAVIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0865

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 17, 2017

L.T. NO.: 09-19670

Denied.
#### COM. v. FASSNACHT, C.

259 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/31/2017

CP-36-CR-0000895-2015

CP-36-CR-0002763-2007

CP-36-CR-0003473-2008

CP-36-CR-0005913-2014

(Lancaster)

Affirmed
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 10.43

 

This is an English translation.

 

Debt Transfer Agreement

 

Transferor: Beijing China Auto Rental Co., Ltd.

 

Transferee: Lianhui Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd.

 

Debtor: Beijing Shenzhou Deke Technology Development Co., Ltd.

 

WHEREAS the Transferor becomes the creditor of the Debtor due to business transactions, and as of 29 February 2012, the Debtor owed RMB 3,460,000.00 in total to the Transferor (hereinafter the “Debts”), the Transferor, the Transferee and the Debtor hereby reach an agreement consenting the Transferor to transfer the Debts to the Transferee at the same value. Effective from 29 February 2012, the Transferee shall become the creditor of such Debts, and the Debtor shall repay such Debts to the Transferee.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized signatories of the three parties have signed their names in the following page on 29 February 2012.

 

The Transferor and the Debtor hereby irrevocably agree that the Promissory Note in the amount of RMB 3,460,000.00 issued by the Debtor to the Transferor on 27 February 2012 shall become null and void from the date of this Debt Transfer Agreement.

 

This Debt Transfer Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the People’s Republic of China.

 

[Signature Page Below]

 











 

Transferor: Beijing China Auto Rental Co., Ltd.

 

 

	
[Company seal affixed]
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Legal Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Transferee: Lianhui Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
[Company seal affixed]
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Legal Representative
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Debtor: Beijing   Shenzhou Deke Technology Development Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
[Company seal affixed]
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Charles Zhengyao Lu
    	
 
    
	
Legal Representative