26212 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

no adverse comment. We have 

explained our reasons for this action in 

the preamble to the direct final rule. 

If we receive no adverse comment, we 

will not take further action on this 

proposed rule. If the EPA receives 

adverse comment in response to the 

direct final rule, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

direct final rule will not take effect. In 

that case, we would address all public 

comments in any subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. 

We do not intend to institute a second 

comment period on this action. Any 

parties interested in commenting must 

do so at this time. For further 

information about commenting on this 

rule, please see the information 

provided in the ADDRESSES section of 

this document. 

The regulatory text for the proposal is 

identical to that for the direct final rule 

published in the ‘‘Rules and 

Regulations’’ section of this Federal 

Register. For further supplementary 

information, the detailed rationale for 

the proposal and the regulatory 

revisions, see the direct final rule 

published in a separate part of this 

Federal Register. 

Neither this rule or direct final rule 

address any issues concerning the 

federal PSD permit rescission 

regulations at 40 CFR 52.21(w) that are 

not related to the Supreme Court 

decision in UARG v. EPA and the 

amended judgment of the D.C. Circuit. 

The EPA is developing a separate 

rulemaking action that will provide an 

opportunity for the public to comment 

on others circumstances where 40 CFR 

52.21(w) may limit the ability to rescind 

PSD permits that are no longer 

necessary. 

III. Does this action apply to me? 

The entities potentially affected by 

this rule include new and modified 

stationary sources that were required to 

obtain an EPA-issued Step 2 PSD permit 

under the federal PSD regulations found 

at 40 CFR 52.21 solely because the 

source or a modification of the source 

was expected to emit or increase GHG 

emissions over the applicable 

thresholds. This includes (1) sources 

classified as major for PSD purposes 

solely on the basis of their potential 

GHG emissions; and (2) sources emitting 

major amounts of other pollutants that 

experienced a modification resulting in 

an increase of only greenhouse gas 

emission above the applicable levels in 

the EPA regulations. Entities affected by 

this rule may also include state or local 

reviewing authorities that have been 

delegated federal authority to 

implement the federal PSD regulations 

under 40 CFR 52.21(u) and that have 

issued Step 2 PSD permits to sources 

within their jurisdiction. This rule does 

not address the requirements for 

approval of a PSD program into a state 

implementation plan (40 CFR 51.166) or 

the rescission of PSD permits issued by 

states and local programs with such 

approved programs. Stationary sources 

with questions on the PSD permitting 

obligations arising from Step 2 PSD 

permits issued by state or local 

reviewing authorities under the 

permitting programs approved into state 

implementation plans should review the 

governing statutory provisions and 

provisions in the applicable approved 

state or local permitting program to 

determine how to address any Step 2 

PSD permitting issues and consult with 

the EPA as necessary. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, National ambient air quality 

standards, New source review, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Permit rescissions, Preconstruction 

permitting, Sulfur oxides, Tailoring 

rule, Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: April 30, 2015. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2015–10629 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 80 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0905; FRL 9927–15– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS58 

Relaxation of the Federal Reid Vapor 

Pressure Gasoline Volatility Standard 

for Birmingham, Alabama 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

request from the state of Alabama for the 

EPA to relax the Reid Vapor Pressure 

(RVP) standard applicable to gasoline 

introduced into commerce from June 1 

to September 15 of each year for 

Jefferson and Shelby counties (‘‘the 

Birmingham area’’). Specifically, the 

EPA is proposing to amend the 

regulations to change the RVP standard 

for the Birmingham area from 7.8 

pounds per square inch (psi) to 9.0 psi 

for gasoline. The EPA has preliminarily 

determined that this change to the 

federal RVP regulation is consistent 

with the applicable provisions of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before June 8, 2015 

unless a public hearing is requested by 

May 22, 2015. If the EPA receives such 

a request, we will publish information 

related to the timing and location of the 

hearing and a new deadline for public 

comment. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2014–0905, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

• Mail: Air Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, Attention 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2014– 

0905. Please include a total of two 

copies. 

• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation 

Docket, EPA Docket Center, WJC West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004. 

Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2014–0905. Please include two 

copies. Such deliveries are accepted 

only during the Docket’s normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2014– 

0905. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means that the EPA will not 

know your identity or contact 

information unless you provide it in the 

body of your comment. If you send an 

email comment directly to the EPA 

without going through 

www.regulations.gov your email address 

will be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is 

placed in the public docket and made 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules 26213 

available on the Internet. If you submit 

an electronic comment, the EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, the EPA may not 

be able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about the EPA’s public docket, visit the 

EPA Docket Center homepage at 

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/

dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC. The Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566– 

1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Patty Klavon, Office of Transportation 

and Air Quality, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood 

Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105; 

telephone number: (734) 214–4476; fax 

number: (734) 214–4052; email address: 

klavon.patty@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The contents of this preamble are 

listed in the following outline: 

I. General Information 

II. Public Participation 

III. Background and Proposal 

IV. Direct Final Rule 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

VI. Legal Authority 

I. General Information 

A. This Proposed Rule Is Published 

Parallel to a Direct Final Rule 

In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ 

section of this Federal Register, the EPA 

is making this revision as a direct final 

rule without prior proposal because the 

EPA views these revisions as 

noncontroversial and anticipates no 

adverse comment. The rationale for this 

rulemaking is described both in this 

proposal and in the direct final rule. 

The regulatory text for this proposed 

rule is included in the direct final rule, 

and parties should review that rule for 

the regulatory text. If the EPA receives 

no adverse comment, the EPA will not 

take further action on this proposed 

rule. If the EPA receives adverse 

comment on this rule or any portion of 

this rule, the EPA will withdraw the 

direct final rule or the portion of the 

rule that received adverse comment. All 

public comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on this rulemaking. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. 

B. Does this action apply to me? 

Entities potentially affected by this 

rule are fuel producers and distributors 

who do business in Alabama. 

Examples of potentially 

regulated entities NAICS1 codes 

Petroleum refineries ............. 324110 

Gasoline Marketers and Distributors ............................. 424710 

424720 

Gasoline Retail Stations ....... 447110 

Gasoline Transporters .......... 484220 

484230 

1 North American Industry Classification 

System. 

The above table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

regulated by this action. The table lists 

the types of entities of which the EPA 

is aware that potentially could be 

affected by this rule. Other types of 

entities not listed on the table could also 

be affected by this rule. To determine 

whether your organization could be 

affected by this rule, you should 

carefully examine the regulations in 40 

CFR 80.27. If you have questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, call the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this preamble. 

C. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments? 

1. Submitting CBI 

Do not submit CBI to the EPA through 

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to the EPA, mark the outside 

of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments 

When submitting comments, 

remember to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The EPA may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree, 

suggest alternatives, and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Docket Copying Costs 

You may be required to pay a 

reasonable fee for copying docket 

materials. 

II. Public Participation 

The EPA will not hold a public 

hearing on this matter unless a request 

is received by the person identified in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section of this preamble by May 22, 

2015. If the EPA receives such a request, 

we will publish information related to 

the timing and location of the hearing 

and a new deadline for public comment. 

III. Background and Proposal 

A. Summary of the Proposal 

The EPA is proposing to approve a 

request from the state of Alabama to 

change the summertime RVP standard 

for Jefferson and Shelby counties (‘‘the 

Birmingham area’’) from 7.8 psi to 9.0 

psi by amending the EPA’s regulations 

at 40 CFR 80.27(a)(2). In a previous 

rulemaking, the EPA approved a state 

implementation plan (SIP) revision from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

26214 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

2The Birmingham area (i.e., Jefferson and Shelby 

counties) was designated as unclassifiable/

attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS effective July 

20, 2012. See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). 

the state of Alabama which provided a 

technical demonstration that relaxing 

the federal RVP requirement from 7.8 

psi to 9.0 psi for gasoline sold from June 

1 to September 15 of each year in the 

Birmingham area would not interfere 

with maintenance of the NAAQS in the 

Birmingham area or with any other 

applicable CAA requirement. For more 

information on Alabama’s SIP revision, 

please refer to the April 17, 2015 

rulemaking (80 FR 21170). 

The preamble for this rulemaking is 

organized as follows: Section III.B. 

provides the history of the federal 

gasoline volatility regulation. Section 

III.C. describes the policy regarding 

relaxation of volatility standards in 

ozone nonattainment areas that are 

redesignated as attainment areas. 

Section III.D. provides information 

specific to Alabama’s request for the 

Birmingham area. Finally, Section IV. 

briefly discusses the associated direct 

final rule. 

B. History of the Gasoline Volatility 

Requirement 

On August 19, 1987 (52 FR 31274), 

the EPA determined that gasoline 

nationwide was becoming increasingly 

volatile, causing an increase in 

evaporative emissions from gasolinepowered vehicles and equipment. 

Evaporative emissions from gasoline, 

referred to as volatile organic 

compounds (VOC), are precursors to the 

formation of tropospheric ozone and 

contribute to the nation’s ground-level 

ozone problem. Exposure to groundlevel ozone can reduce lung function, 

thereby aggravating asthma and other 

respiratory conditions, increase 

susceptibility to respiratory infection, 

and may contribute to premature death 

in people with heart and lung disease. 

The most common measure of fuel 

volatility that is useful in evaluating 

gasoline evaporative emissions is RVP. 

Under CAA section 211(c), the EPA 

promulgated regulations on March 22, 

1989 (54 FR 11868) that set maximum 

limits for the RVP of gasoline sold 

during the regulatory control periods 

that were established on a state-by-state 

basis in the final rule. The regulatory 

control periods addressed the portion of 

the year when peak ozone 

concentrations were expected. These 

regulations constituted Phase I of a twophase nationwide program, which was 

designed to reduce the volatility of 

gasoline during the high ozone season. 

On June 11, 1990 (55 FR 23658), the 

EPA promulgated more stringent 

volatility controls as Phase II of the 

volatility control program. These 

requirements established maximum 

RVP standards of 9.0 psi or 7.8 psi 

(depending on the state, the month, and 

the area’s initial ozone attainment 

designation with respect to the 1-hour 

ozone NAAQS.) 

The 1990 CAA Amendments 

established a new section 211(h) to 

address fuel volatility. CAA section 

211(h) requires the EPA to promulgate 

regulations making it unlawful to sell, 

offer for sale, dispense, supply, offer for 

supply, transport, or introduce into 

commerce gasoline with an RVP level in 

excess of 9.0 psi during the high ozone 

season. CAA section 211(h) also 

prohibits the EPA from establishing a 

volatility standard more stringent than 

9.0 psi in an attainment area, except that 

the EPA may impose a lower (more 

stringent) standard in any former ozone 

nonattainment area redesignated to 

attainment. 

On December 12, 1991 (56 FR 64704), 

the EPA modified the Phase II volatility 

regulations to be consistent with CAA 

section 211(h). The modified regulations 

prohibited the sale of gasoline with an 

RVP above 9.0 psi in all areas 

designated attainment for ozone, 

effective January 13, 1992. For areas 

designated as nonattainment, the 

regulations retained the original Phase II 

standards published on June 11, 1990 

(55 FR 23658), which included the 7.8 

psi ozone season limitation for certain 

areas. As stated in the preamble to the 

Phase II volatility controls and 

reiterated in the proposed change to the 

volatility standards published in 1991, 

the EPA will rely on states to initiate 

changes to their respective volatility 

programs. The EPA’s policy for 

approving such changes is described 

below in Section III.C. 

The state of Alabama has initiated this 

change by requesting that the EPA relax 

the 7.8 psi RVP standard to 9.0 psi for 

the Birmingham area, which is subject 

to the 7.8 RVP requirement during the 

summertime ozone season. Accordingly, 

the state of Alabama provided a 

technical demonstration showing that 

relaxing the federal RVP requirements 

in the Birmingham area from 7.8 psi to 

9.0 psi would not interfere with 

maintenance of the NAAQS or with any 

other applicable CAA requirement. 

C. The EPA’s Policy Regarding 

Relaxation of Volatility Standards in 

Ozone Nonattainment Areas That Are 

Redesignated to Attainment Areas 

As stated in the preamble for the 

EPA’s amended Phase II volatility 

standards (56 FR 64706), any change in 

the volatility standard for a 

nonattainment area that was 

subsequently redesignated as an 

attainment area must be accomplished 

through a separate rulemaking that 

revises the applicable standard for that 

area. Thus, for former 1-hour ozone 

nonattainment areas where the EPA 

mandated a Phase II volatility standard 

of 7.8 psi RVP in the December 12, 1991 

rulemaking, the federal 7.8 psi RVP 

requirement remains in effect, even after 

such an area is redesignated to 

attainment, until a separate rulemaking 

is completed that relaxes the federal 

RVP standard in that area from 7.8 psi 

to 9.0 psi. 

As explained in the December 12, 

1991 rulemaking, the EPA believes that 

relaxation of an applicable RVP 

standard is best accomplished in 

conjunction with the redesignation 

process. In order for an ozone 

nonattainment area to be redesignated 

as an attainment area, CAA section 

107(d)(3) requires the state to make a 

showing, pursuant to CAA section 

175A, that the area is capable of 

maintaining attainment for the ozone 

NAAQS for ten years. Depending on the 

area’s circumstances, this maintenance 

plan will either demonstrate that the 

area is capable of maintaining 

attainment for ten years without the 

more stringent volatility standard or that 

the more stringent volatility standard 

may be necessary for the area to 

maintain its attainment with the ozone 

NAAQS. Therefore, in the context of a 

request for redesignation, the EPA will 

not relax the volatility standard unless 

the state requests a relaxation and the 

maintenance plan demonstrates to the 

satisfaction of the EPA that the area will 

maintain attainment for ten years 

without the need for the more stringent 

volatility standard. 

Alabama did not request relaxation of 

the federal RVP standard from 7.8 psi to 

9.0 psi when the Birmingham area was 

redesignated to attainment for either the 

1-hour ozone NAAQS or the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS. However, Alabama took a 

conservative approach in developing 

maintenance plans associated with 

those redesignation requests by 

estimating emissions using a federal 

RVP requirement of 9.0 psi. 

D. Alabama’s Request to Relax the 

Federal RVP Requirement for the 

Birmingham Area 

In a May 12, 2006 final rule, the EPA 

approved the Birmingham area’s 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan for the 1997 ozone NAAQS. See 71 

FR 27631 (May 12, 2006).2 As required, 

the CAA section 175A maintenance 

plan provides for continued attainment 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Proposed Rules 26215 

3 In 2001, the EPA approved a state fuel program 

that imposed a more stringent 7.0 psi requirement 

for the Birmingham area, per CAA section 

211(c)(4)(C). The low-RVP fuel program required 

that all gasoline sold during the summertime ozone 

season (June 1–September 15 of each year) in the 

Birmingham area contain a maximum RVP of 7.0 

psi. See 77 FR 23620 (April 20, 2012). 

and maintenance of the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS for at least ten years from the 

effective date of the Birmingham area’s 

redesignation to attainment for the 1997 

ozone NAAQS. This maintenance plan 

also includes components 

demonstrating how the Birmingham 

area will continue to attain the 1997 

ozone NAAQS, and provides 

contingency measures should the 

Birmingham area violate the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS. The state of Alabama’s ozone 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan for the Birmingham area did not 

remove the state-level 7.0 psi RVP 

requirement that was in place for the 

Birmingham area.3

On March 2, 2012, the state of 

Alabama, through the Alabama 

Department of Environmental 

Management (ADEM), submitted a 

proposed revision to Alabama’s SIP 

removing the state-level RVP 

requirement to use 7.0 psi RVP gasoline 

in the Birmingham area during the 

summertime ozone season. The EPA 

approved the revision in an April 20, 

2012 final rule. See 77 FR 23619. The 

revision to the Alabama SIP resulted in 

the federal RVP requirement of 7.8 psi 

applying to the Birmingham area. 

On November 14, 2014, the state of 

Alabama submitted a proposed revision 

to its SIP demonstrating that removal of 

the federal RVP requirement of 7.8 psi 

for gasoline during the summertime 

ozone season in the Birmingham area 

would not interfere with maintenance of 

any NAAQS. Specifically, the state 

provided a technical demonstration 

showing that relaxing the federal RVP 

requirement in the Birmingham area 

from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi would not 

interfere with maintenance of the 

NAAQS or with any other applicable 

requirement of the CAA. 

The EPA evaluated and approved 

Alabama’s November 14, 2014 SIP 

revision in a previous rulemaking that 

was subject to public notice-andcomment. The EPA received two 

comments on that rulemaking, and 

those comments were addressed in the 

final rule for that rulemaking. See 80 FR 

21170 (April 17, 2015). The comments 

received can be found in the docket for 

that rulemaking (EPA–R04–OAR–2014– 

0867). 

In this action, the EPA is proposing to 

approve Alabama’s request to relax the 

summertime ozone season RVP standard 

for the Birmingham area from 7.8 psi to 

9.0 psi. Specifically, the EPA is 

proposing to amend the applicable RVP 

standard from 7.8 psi to 9.0 psi 

provided at 40 CFR 80.27(a)(2) for the 

Birmingham area. This is based on the 

previous approval of Alabama’s 

November 14, 2014 SIP revision, and 

the fact that the Birmingham area is 

currently in attainment for all ozone 

NAAQS. 

IV. Direct Final Rule 

A direct final rule that would make 

the same changes as those proposed in 

this action appears in the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register. The EPA is taking direct final 

action on these revisions because the 

EPA views the revisions as 

noncontroversial and anticipates no 

adverse comment. The EPA has 

explained the reasons for the 

amendments in this proposal and in the 

direct final rule. If no adverse comments 

are received, no further action will be 

taken on the proposal, and the direct 

final rule will become effective as 

provided in that action. 

If the EPA receives adverse comments 

on the rule or any portion of the rule, 

the EPA will withdraw the direct final 

rule or the portion of the rule that 

received adverse comment. The EPA 

will publish a timely withdrawal in the 

Federal Register indicating which 

provisions are being withdrawn. All 

public comments received will then be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. The EPA 

will not institute a second comment 

period on the subsequent final action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. 

The changes to the regulatory text 

proposed in this document are identical 

to those for the direct final rule 

published in the Rules and Regulations 

section of this Federal Register. For 

further information, including the 

regulatory revisions, see the direct final 

rule published in a separate part of this 

Federal Register. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

For a complete discussion of all the 

administrative requirements applicable 

to this action, see the direct final rule in 

the Rules and Regulations section of this 

Federal Register. 

VI. Legal Authority 

The statutory authority for this action 

is granted to the EPA by Sections 211(h) 

and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act, as 

amended; 42 U.S.C. 7545(h) and 

7601(a). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedures, 

Air pollution control, Fuel additives, 

Gasoline, Incorporation by reference, 

Motor vehicle and motor vehicle 

engines, Motor vehicle pollution, 

Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: April 30, 2015. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2015–10615 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS