alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Michael Volpe, is the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CMS Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify
that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at
such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: January 27, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL A. VOLPE                             
|                       |  |  |  | Michael A. Volpe                                 
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 12-6810.

#### Ramirez-Salazar *v.*Outlaw, Warden.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064892
<NAME> FDS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-21-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           16185
<SECURITIES>                                     12219
<RECEIVABLES>                                    39036
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2927
<INVENTORY>                                      44761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                123638
<PP&E>                                           35017
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  187298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            27679
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      24971270
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    187298
<SALES>                                          54076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 54076
<CGS>                                            18985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    45709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8886
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
280P15

#### In re Foreclosure of Real Property Under Deed of Trust from Michael D. Gutowski and Mary Anne Gutowski, in the Original Amount of $286,000, Dated November 9, 2006 and Recorded on November 15, 2006 in Book 4367 at Page 502, Union County Registry; Trustee Services of Carolina, LLC, Substitute Trustee

1. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA14-881)

2. Respondents’ *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-3I

3. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion for Stay of Foreclosure Sale

4. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion to Enjoin All Other State Actions

5. Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

6. Respondents’ *Pro Se*Motion for Stay in Light of Bankruptcy Filing

1.-

2. Denied

3. Denied 08/25/2015

4. Dismissed as moot

5. Allowed

6. Dismissed as moot
#### Christian LUDWIGSEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Janet NAVARRO, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-0968

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 09, 2017

L.T.NO.: 15-22318

Dismissed.
395P14

#### Lois A. Sauls v. Roland Gary Sauls

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA14-41)

2. Pit’s Motion for Sanctions

3. Defs Motion for Issuance of Stay

4. Def’s Motion to Withdraw PDR

5. Pit’s Motion for Leave to Withdraw Response to PDR and Motion for Sanctions

i.-

2.-

3. Dismissed as moot

4. Allowed

5. Allowed
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NEETAN SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73831

Agency No. A075-247-194

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Neetan Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider its

previous order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73831

a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir.

2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh’s motion to reconsider

because he failed to establish any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior

determination that he had not established the due diligence necessary for equitable

tolling of the filing deadline for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1);

Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 678-80 (9th Cir. 2011) (equitable tolling

available where petitioner shows he was prevented from filing because of

deception, fraud, or error, and acted with due diligence in discovering such

circumstances).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|South Dakota Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|South Dakota Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0      |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 914   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,193  | 1,155  | 2,331  | 1,846  | 1,947  | 2,558  | 2,231  | 3,431  | 3,920  | 4,369 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 881    | 882    | 1,456  | 1,306  | 1,437  | 1,252  | 1,329  | 1,598  | 1,620  | 1,566 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,652  | 1,100  | 1,025  | 1,103  | 1,093  | 992    | 963    | 995    | 1,644  | 2,129 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,862  | 1,848  | 15,085 | 16,205 | 15,305 | 553    | 455    | 476    | 447    | 414   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 160    | 161    | 165    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Awareness
Letter of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  November
7, 2008
  Mercury
General Corporation
 Los
Angeles, California
  Re:
Registration Statement Nos. 333-62228, 333-01583 and 333-125460
  With
respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of
the use therein of our report dated November 7, 2008 related to our review of
interim financial information.
  Pursuant
to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not
considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified
by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.
  /s/ KPMG
LLP
  Los
Angeles, California
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Oregon Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Oregon Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 157    | 179   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 194    | 397    | 401    | 387    | 126    | 112    | 106    |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 232    | 238    | 259    | 264    | 260    | 264    | 273    | 276    | 276    | 273   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 273    | 269    | 263    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

SONIA M. BEGGS, individually and as personal representative for the ESTATE OF JAMES L.
BEGGS,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant

- Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 23, 2022

v No. 354797

Oceana Circuit Court
STEVEN P. FREED, LC No. 19

- 013888

- CH

Defendant/Counterplaintiff

- Appellant.

Before: K. F. K ELLY

, P .J., and SHAPIRO and GADOLA , JJ.

S HAPIRO

, J. ( concurring ).

I concur

, though I do not subscribe to a portion of the majority’s opinion. The majority concludes that the language of the easement is unambiguous. I believe the trial court properly concluded that the provision was ambiguous as to whether the “exclusive easemen t” was intended to bar the owners of the servient estate from using their own property or to prevent a second easement over that land being granted to some third party. Despite my difference with the majority on this aspect of the analysis, because the ex trinsic evidence makes the intent of the parties clear, I agree with its conclusion that the easement was to be exclusive even as against the owners of the servient estate. As to the issue regarding the scope of the easement, specifically with regard to

c onstruction of a fence, I agree fully with the majority.

/s/ Douglas B. Shapiro
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2972-2973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-11-000]


Long Island Lighting Company; Notice of Filing

January 13, 1998.
    Take notice that on December 22, 1997, Long Island Lighting Company 
tendered for filing a Settlement Agreement Request for Establishment of 
Technical Conference.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before January 20, 1998. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in

[[Page 2973]]

determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1219 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12550]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice of submission for OMB review of a revision of a 
currently approved information collection (63 FR 24179) published on 
May 1, 1998 is withdrawn because the period for public comment in still 
open until May 26, 1998. This period for public comment was originally 
published on March 27, 1998, in 63 FR, No. 59, 14938.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Any additional information may be obtained from Daniel Garcia, Export-
Import Bank of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave., N.W. Washington, 
D.C. 20571, (202) 565-3335.

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
Daniel Garcia,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-12550 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
All Incident Reports in the EIIS700800

S500600

T ED INCIDENT S200300400

B ER OF REPOR T0100200 6 6 6 8 7 0 7 2 7 4 7 6 7 8 8 0 8 2 8 4 8 6 8 8 9 0 9 2 9 4 9 6 9 8 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8

NUM BTOTAL = 7,272

19 6

19 6 19 7 19 7 19 7 19 7 19 7 19 8 19 8 19 8 19 8 19 8 19 9 19 9 19 9 19 9 19 9 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0YEAR1(Graph does not include incidents from1949, 1960, and those with ‘no dates’)The views expressed in this presentationare those of the presenter and do not necessarily represent the policies or positionsof theEnvironmental Protection Agency or the United States.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Maryland Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Maryland Natural Gas Lease Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1      | 2      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 1      | 1     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 3      | 3      | 1      | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1210 

To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maritime Lien Reform 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON MARITIME LIENS ON FISHING PER7 MIT AND PERMIT DESCRIPTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 313 of 

9 title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1210 IH

1 ‘‘§ 31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing per2 mit and permit description 

3 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—This chapter— 

4 ‘‘(1) does not establish a maritime lien on a 

5 permit that— 

6 ‘‘(A) authorizes a person or use of a vessel 

7 to engage in fishing; and 

8 ‘‘(B) is issued under State or Federal law; 

9 and 

10 ‘‘(2) does not authorize any civil action to en11 force a maritime lien on such a permit. 

12 ‘‘(b) FISHING PERMIT DESCRIBED.—A fishing per13 mit— 

14 ‘‘(1) is governed solely by the State or Federal 

15 law under which it was issued; and 

16 ‘‘(2) is not included in the whole of a vessel or 

17 as an appurtenance or intangible of a vessel for any 

18 purpose. 

19 ‘‘(c) LIMITATION ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.— 

20 Nothing in subsections (a) and (b) shall be construed as 

21 imposing any limitation upon the authority of the Sec22 retary of Commerce to modify, suspend, revoke, or sanc23 tion any Federal fishery permit issued by the Secretary 

24 of Commerce or to bring a civil action to enforce such 

25 modification, suspension, revocation, or sanction.’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1210 IH

1 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS AMENDMENT.—The table of 

2 sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by 

3 inserting after the item relating to section 31309 the fol4 lowing: 

‘‘31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit description.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS