alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                          
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Price of Everett, MA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Australia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Price of Everett, MA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Australia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.55  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
            this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-2CB (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


       /s/ Steve Bailey
       ----------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
#### The Manes Organization, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Polar International Brokerage Corp., Appellant-Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[770 NYS2d 27]

*293Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered June 4, 2003, which, to the extent appealed and cross-appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants Meadowbrook-Richman, Inc. and Total Dollar Management Effort, Ltd. and the cross motion of defendant Polar International Brokerage Corp. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs first and second causes of action for negligence and professional malpractice, unanimously modified, on the law, to dismiss the complaint and cross claim as against defendant Polar, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

In light of the absence of evidence of a special relationship between defendants and plaintiff, upon which a duty to advise plaintiff respecting the terms of its insurance policy might be premised, plaintiffs negligence claims were properly dismissed *(see Murphy v Kuhn,*90 NY2d 266, 270-271 [1997]; *cf. Baseball Off. of Commr. v Marsh & McLennan,*295 AD2d 73 [2002]). Moreover, plaintiff has set forth no independent ground upon which to advance a claim for negligence in addition to its cause of action for breach of contract *(Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R.R. Co.,*70 NY2d 382, 389-390 [1987]; *see also McMahan & Co. v Bass,*250 AD2d 460, 462 [1998], *lv denied in part and dismissed in part*92 NY2d 1013 [1998]). Plaintiffs malpractice claims were not viable since, inter alia, defendant insurance brokers and adjuster are not deemed to be professionals *(see Chase Scientific Research v NIA Group,*96 NY2d 20, 30 [2001]; *Santiago v 1370 Broadway Assoc.,*96 NY2d 765, 766 [2001]).

While it is reasonable to impose on an insurance adjuster the obligation to conclude negotiations with a carrier in time to preserve the insured’s right to commence litigation should the carrier unreasonably delay payment of the claim, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that it had a contractual relationship with defendant Polar at the time of the asserted breach *(see Kagan v K-Tel Entertainment,*172 AD2d 375, 377 [1991]). Mere speculation that Polar remained in a joint venture with plaintiffs public adjuster, defendant Meadowbrook-Richman, when plaintiffs *294time to commence suit expired is insufficient to show privity and does not constitute evidence sufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2


ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Victor Lee, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.





April 29, 2019/s/ VICTOR LEEPresident and Chief Executive Officer and a Director(principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer)
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File) 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                           
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|New Mexico Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|New Mexico Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,508  | 355    | 403   
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1,022  | 8,293  | 8,128  | 7,157  | 14,832 | 16,232 | 14,470
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 13,057 | 12,173 | 12,339 | 13,759 | 12,520 | 14,993 | 14,485 | 15,465 | 15,184 | 17,104
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 16,125 | 17,094 | 16,540 | 16,568 | 18,982 | 9,615  | 10,131 | 10,456 | 10,032 | 9,781 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15,280 | 20,009 | 20,977 | 9,817  | 8,674  | 8,151  | 7,437  | 7,637  | 7,671  | 7,740 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,513  | 6,687  | 9,906  | 12,583 | 17,599 | 26,382 | 26,829 | 5,738  | 4,830  | 3,015 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 17,449 | 22,592 | 4,273  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
EX-34 (n)
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 2800
600 Peachtree Street
Atlanta Georgia 30308-2215

Phone: (404) 874-8300
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc. (the Company)
complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the ZC Sterling
Integrated Product Solution (ZIPS) hazard insurance outsourcing Platform
(Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company has
determined that only certain servicing criteria 1122 (d) 1(iv), 1122 (d) 2(vi),
1122 (d) 4(xi), 1122 (d) 4(xii), and 1122 (d) 4(xiii) are applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform covered by this report. See Appendix A of management's assertion for
the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than
all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the Platform. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
for the ZIPS Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young

February 20, 2007


A Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER O N M OTION F OR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: W.J Billy Devillier and Paula Winser v. A.P. Leonards and Mil d r ed G.

Leonards

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00223

- CV

Trial court case numbe r: P03986A

Trial court: County Court of Chambers County

, Texas

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing is denied

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

Acting for the Court

P anel consists of Just ices Keyes, Lloyd, and Landau

.

Keyes, J., dissenting to the denial of rehearing.

Date: D ecember 31 , 2020
Exhibit 10.7 Promissory Note


Exhibit 10.7







PROMISSORY NOTE




$5,000.00

May 2, 2011




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Lorikeet, Inc., the sum of Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars (5,000.00), together with interest on the unpaid principal balance at a rate per annum equal to eight percent (8%).




Interest on this Note shall accrue on the outstanding principal balance of this Promissory Note from the date hereof. The outstanding principal amount of this Note and all accrued but unpaid interest shall be payable in full on demand.  




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Note as of the day and year first above written.




Maker: Jolley Marketing, Inc.







/s/ Steven L. White                  

By: Steven L. White, President
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 138

To prohibit a suspension of the Act of March 3, 1931 (commonly known

as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Act’’) in the State of Hawaii.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To prohibit a suspension of the Act of March 3, 1931 (commonly known as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Act’’) in the State

of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hawaii Fair Wage Act

5 of 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SUSPENSION.

7 Notwithstanding section 6 of the Act of March 3,

8 1931 (commonly known as the ‘‘Davis-Bacon Act’’) (49

9 Stat. 1011, chapter 825; 40 U.S.C. 276a–5), the Presi10 dent shall not suspend the provisions of such Act within
2

•S 138 IS

1 the State of Hawaii in response to the national emergency

2 caused by Hurricane Iniki in September 1992.

3 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT.

4 The President shall by proclamation amend Procla5 mation No. 6491 (57 Fed. Reg. 47,553; relating to sus6 pension of the Act of March 3, 1931, within a limited geo7 graphic area in response to the national emergency caused

8 by Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki) to eliminate all ref9 erences to the State of Hawaii and Hurricane Iniki.

Æ
J~~~EO ST,yT~S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY z Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



# JAN zs Zo»

THE ADMINISTRATOR 

### The HonorableJerry Brown Governor ofCalifornia State Capitol, Suite 1173 Sacramento, CA95814 Dear Governor Brown: Based on 2006-2008 air quality data, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that Plumas and Shasta and the 8 surrounding counties (Lassen, Modoc, Sierra, Siskiyou, Tehama, and Trinity, and the deferred portions of Butte and Yuba) in California meet the 2006 24-hour fine particle (PMZ,5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) . These counties are linked because they impact air quality monitored in Plumas and Shasta Counties. As directed by the Clean Air Act, EPA is designating these counties as "unclassifiable/attainment" for those standards. Congratulations on this good news. Note that the portions of Butte and Yuba counties that were previously designated as part ofthe Chico and Yuba City-Marysville nonattainment areas, respectively, retain that designation. Fine particle pollution represents one ofthe most significant barriers to clean air facing our nation today. Health studies link these tiny particles - about 1/30t1' the diameter ofa human hair - with serious human health problems Including premature death in people with heart and lung disease; nonfatal heart attacks; and increased hospital admissions and doctor and emergency roomvisits for respiratory and cardiovascular disease. On October 17, 2006, EPA strengthened the primary and secondary 24-hour PMZ,5 NAAQS from65 pg/m3 to 35 iug/m3. In November 2009, EPAdeferred final designations in these counties so that tile Agency could collect and evaluate additional information about monitored air quality in Plumas and Shasta Counties. At that time, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) requested that EPA exclude certain monitored violations in these counties consistent with the "Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events" rule (the Exceptional Events Rule) . Following a reviewof the exceptional event claims and supporting documentation, EPA agreed with the ARB claims as documented in letters dated March 11, 2010 and April 2, 2010 from Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, to Mary D. Nichols, Chairman, California ARB. After excluding the data collected on days with exceptional events, the 2006-2008 air quality in Plumas and Shasta counties meets the 24-hour PM2.5 standards. Your staff may find additional technical information regarding the designations at lhttp ://www .epa. 7ov/pmdesignations.

Internet Address (URL) * http://www .epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable 9 Printedwith VegetableOil Based Inks on 100%Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper

### Thankyoufor your continued efforts to improve air quality. Together, we have made

considerable progress in reducing air pollution and its impacts on public health and the environment. Ifyou have further questions, please contact me or your staffmay call Sarah Hospodor-Pallone, Deputy Associate Administrator for Intergovernmental Relations, at 202-564- 7178. Sincerely, c- = Lisa P . Jackson
#### Russell Scott SHICK, Appellant v. Michael R. CLARK, Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Melinda L. Adams, Deputy Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Carl Franz, Deputy Superintendent, Individually and Collaterally, Michelle Tharp, Grievance Coordinator, Individually and Collaterally, Roni Martucci, Former Grievance Coordinator, Individually and Collaterally, Diane , Woodside, Director of Policy and Legislation, Individually and Collaterally, Christine Zirkle, Former CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Michael Edwards, CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Valerie Kusiak, Former CHCA, Individually and Collaterally, Lisa Linder, R.N.S., Individually and Collaterally, Appellees

No. 33 WAP 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

September 26, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed, and the Application for Relief and the Applica*980tion for Leave to Supplement Filing are denied.
No. 12-6735.

#### Cotton *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.