alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.18

 

March 21, 2012

 

Mr. Michael A. Ribero

850 Arroyo Court

Palo Alto, CA  94306

 

Dear Mike:

 

The purpose of this letter is to memorialize our understanding regarding the consulting services that you will provide to Tropicana Las Vegas, Inc. (“TLV”).

 

Services:                                                                                                You will provide consulting services in connection with TLV’s marketing initiatives which will require that you will spend at least two and a half to three days each week focused exclusively on TLV’s marketing initiatives.

 

Term:                                                                                                                  Beginning on January 1, 2012 and continuing thereafter until terminated by TLV in its sole discretion.

 

Consulting Fee:                                                            $12,500 per month for January and February 2012.  $25,000 per month for March 2012 and thereafter.  Performance bonuses at TLV’s discretion.

 

Business Expenses:                                       All reasonable business expenses incurred on behalf of TLV shall be reimbursed.

 

Location:                                                                                              Palo Alto, CA, with trips to Las Vegas at least every other week and other locations on an as needed basis.

 

Title:                                                                                                                     Strategic Advisor, Office of the Chairman

 

I am very much looking forward to working with you on these exciting marketing initiatives.

 

	
Warmest regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Alex Yemenidjian
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Alex Yemenidjian
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Idaho Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Idaho Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 38     | 5      | 6      | 22     | 4     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K
of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 and filed with the U. S.
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  September 24, 2008
        ------------------
                                           /s/ T J Jesky
                                           ---------------------------
                                               T J Jesky
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                           5,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,831
<INVENTORY>                                     10,232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,239
<PP&E>                                          29,353
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,257
<BONDS>                                         35,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           888
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,592
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,334
<SALES>                                         56,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,505
<CGS>                                           34,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (357)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (643)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (269)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (374)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (374)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
#### COM. v. ADAMS, T.

1658 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/17/2017

CP-25-CR-0000350-2014

(Erie)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          71,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,166
<INVENTORY>                                    392,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               803,364
<PP&E>                                          80,808
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          336,504
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,230
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,838
<SALES>                                        619,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               619,754
<CGS>                                          362,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  247,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 242
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.003
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The Midland Company:

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited condensed interim
financial information of The Midland Company and subsidiaries for the periods
ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, as indicated in our report dated May 3, 2004;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-64821 and 333-109867
on Form S-3 and Nos. 33-48511, 333-40560 and 333-101390 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cincinnati, Ohio

May 3, 2004
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0267.LEROY BANKS,III v.PROGRESSIVEINSURANCECOMPANY

et al.

Leroy Banks, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against six defendants.

The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, and Banks filed a request to amend his

complaint to add a newdefendant. The trial court entered an order finding that Banks

had properly served only one defendant, but that defendant was not a proper party to

the case. Accordingly, the court dismissed the named defendants, but it granted

Banks’s request to add a new defendant and ordered Banks to file an amended

complaint. Banks appeals, but we lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final

judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” “In

a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than

all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final

judgment.” Johnson v. Hosp. Corp.of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731)

(1989) (punctuation omitted). “In such circumstances, there must be an express

determination under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or there must be compliance with the

interlocutory appeal requirements ofOCGA§ 5-6-34 (b).Where neither ofthese code

sections [is] followed, the appeal is premature and must be dismissed.” Id. (citations

and punctuation omitted).

In this case, although the trial court dismissed the six original defendants, the

court also allowed Banks to add a new defendant to the case. Thus, the case remains

pending below. The trial court’s order did not direct the entry of judgment pursuant

September 13, 2024
to OCGA§ 9-11-54 (b), and Banks did notfollowthe interlocutory appeal procedures

of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Under these circumstances, we lack jurisdiction over this

direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

09/13/2024