alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1


      CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC.


<PAGE>


                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        RESIDENTIAL ACCREDIT LOANS, INC.

      The undersigned,  a natural person of full age, for the purpose of forming
a corporation under the General  Corporation Law of Delaware,  does hereby adopt
the following Articles of Incorporation:

                                    ARTICLE I

      The name of the corporation shall be Residential Accredit Loans, Inc.

                                   ARTICLE II

      The registered  office of this corporation is located at Corporation Trust
Center, 1209 Orange Street,  Wilmington,  New Castle County,  Delaware 19801 and
the registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

                                   ARTICLE III

      The purpose for which the  corporation  is  organized  is to engage in any
lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General
Corporation Law of Delaware.

                                   ARTICLE IV

      The total number of shares of stock which this corporation  shall have the
authority  to issue is one  thousand  (1,000)  shares of Common Stock with a par
value of One Cent ($.01) per share.

                                    ARTICLE V

      The board of directors is authorized  to make,  alter or repeal the bylaws
of the Corporation. Election of directors need not be by written ballot.

                                   ARTICLE VI

      The name and address of the incorporator are:

      Name              Address

      Lorna P. Gleason  4444 Fondell Drive, Edina, MN 55435


<PAGE>

                                   ARTICLE VII

      The corporation is to have perpetual existence.

                                  ARTICLE VIII

      A  director  of the  corporation  shall  not be  personally  liable to the
corporation  or its  stockholders  for monetary  damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director,  except for (i)  liability  based on a breach of the duty of
loyalty to the  corporation  or the  stockholders;  (ii)  liability  for acts or
omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional  misconduct or a knowing
violation of law;  (iii)  liability  under  Section 174 of the Delaware  General
Corporation Law, or liability based on the payment of an improper  dividend,  or
(iv) liability for any transaction  form which the director  derived an improper
personal benefit.

      I, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the incorporator named above, for the purpose of
forming a corporation  pursuant to the General  Corporation  Law of the State of
Delaware, do make this Certificate, hereby declaring and certifying that this is
my act and deed and the facts  herein  stated  are true,  and  accordingly  have
hereunto set my hand this 7th day of August, 1995.

                                        INCORPORATOR:

                                        /s/ Lorna P. Gleason
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|South Carolina Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|South Carolina Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 876,596  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 926,742   | 923,920 | 937,086 | 893,469 | 896,007 | 906,316 | 965,420 | 971,634 | 957,525 | 1,069,291
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,046,316 | 993,673 | 937,957 | 946,937 | 882,417 | 818,159 | 846,017 | 869,883 | 917,065 | 936,090  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 969,251   | 971,418 | 908,475 | 708,832 | 623,696 | 528,691 | 450,231 | 386,662 | 490,198 | 251,667  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 203,964   | 216,465 | 366,750 |         |         |         |         |         |         |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
FILED

February 5, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

EASTERN SECTION AT KNOXVILLE

STATE OF TENNESSEE )

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN )

SERVICES, ) KNOX JUVENILE

)

Plaintiff/Appellee )

) NO. 03A01-9601-JV-00021

v. )

)

CHARLENE AVERY FOUNTAIN, )

)

Defendant/Appellant ) AFFIRMED

J U D G M E N T

This appeal came on to be heard upon the record from the Juvenile Court of

Knox County and briefs filed on behalf of the respective parties. Upon consideration

thereof, this court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the trial court’s

judgment.

It is therefore, ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed. Costs are assessed to the appellant and her surety, for

which execution may issue if necessary. The case is remanded to the Juvenile

Court of Knox County for collection of costs pursuant to applicable law.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Sun World Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Coonfer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  September 11, 2007

By: /s/ Greg Coonfer



Name: Greg Coonfer

Title:   Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4345-000]


OGE Energy Resources, Inc., Notice of Filing

May 1, 1998.
    Take notice that on February 4, 1998, OGE Energy Resources, Inc. 
(OERI), filed a notification of a change in status to reflect certain 
departures from the facts the Commission relief upon in granting 
market-based rate authority.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 11, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12119 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Yanker PEREZ-DIAZ, Appellee.

No. 3D16-2420

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. ■

Kenneth P. Speiller, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, EMAS and LUCK, JJ.

ON MOTION TO ENFORCE MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

.In State v. Perez-Diaz, 189 So.3d 896 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), the State appealed the trial court’s downward departure sentence, which was imposed following an open, non-negotiated plea. We held that the trial court erred in imposing a downward departure- sentence, reversed the sentence, and remanded “for sentencing under the sentencing guidelines.” H. at 902. The mandate issued on April 28, 2016.

*Following*our remand, and while the case remained pending in the trial court for imposition of a sentence under the sentencing guidelines, Perez-Diaz filed a motion for postconviction reliéf. Instead of carrying out the mandate of this court, the trial court heard the motion for postconviction relief, granted the motion, and vacated the plea, the finding of guilt, the judgment and the sentence. The State filed a notice of appeal from that order.

We treat this appeal as a motion to enforce the mandate in case number 3D14-2885, grant the motion, and quash the trial court’s order granting the motion for postconviction, relief. A trial court is “not authorized to deviate from the terms of an appellate court’s instructions.” Hearns v. State, 54 So.3d 500, 502 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (quoting Akins v. Akins, 839 So.2d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)). This court reversed the sentence and remanded this cause to the trial court for the singular purpose of imposing a sentence under *1073the sentencing guidelines. The trial court’s action, regardless of how well-intentioned, violated that mandate. As we have said before: “A trial court’s role upon the issuance of a mandate from an appellate court becomes purely miriisterial, and its function is limited to obeying the appellate court’s order or decree.” Hearns, 54 So.Sd at 502. Accordingly, we quash the order vacating the guilty plea, finding of guilt, judgment and sentence1, and instruct the trial court to comply with this court’s mandate by sentencing Perez-Diaz under the sentencing guidelines.2

1

. We note that, given our earlier reversal of the downward departure sentence, there was no sentence for the trial court to vacate on remand.

2

. Following sentencing, Perez-Diaz may refile his motion for post-conviction relief if appropriate, and the trial court may entertain such motion. We express no opinion oh the merits of Perez-Diaz’s previously-filed motion.
# C_2019389EN.01000801.xml

| 18.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9539 — BNP Paribas/Deutsche Bank (Global Prime Finance and Electronic Equities Business Assets))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 389/03)

On 8 November 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9539. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9539. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### COM. v. TIBURCIO, J.

1589 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/22/2017

CP-06-CR-0004618-2015

(Berks)

Affirmed
VI

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1362

For the relief of Gorsha Michaelovich Sur.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Gorsha Michaelovich Sur.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF CERTAIN NATURALIZATION RE4 QUIREMENTS FOR GORSHA MICHAELOVICH

5 SUR.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the inability of

7 Gorsha Michaelovich Sur to meet the requirements of sec8 tion 316 of the Immigration and Nationality Act that re9 late to residence and physical presence in the United

10 States, he shall be deemed eligible for naturalization upon

11 the filing of the appropriate application if otherwise quali12 fied for naturalization under such Act.
2

•S 1362 IS

1 (b) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

2 FEES.—Subsection (a) shall apply only if the application

3 for naturalization is filed with appropriate fees within 2

4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1166]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
January 9, 1998

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3300.
    Date Filed: January 5, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC3 Telex Mail Vote 904, Korea-Japan/China fares, 
Intended effective date: February 1, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3301.
    Date Filed: January 5, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC1 Telex Mail Vote 905, Chile-Brazil PEX fares, Intended 
effective date: January 15, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3302.
    Date Filed: January 5, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC23 AFR-TC3 0028 dated December 5, 1997, Africa TC3 
Resos r1-40, Minutes--PTC23 AFR-TC3 0029, dated December 23, 1997, 
Tables--PTC23 AFR-TC3 Fares 0012, dated December 19, 1997, Intended 
effective date: April 1, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3315.
    Date Filed: January 7, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC3 Telex Mail Vote 906, Japan-China fares, Intended 
effective date: January 15, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3316.
    Date Filed: January 7, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PSC/Reso/090 dated December 1, 1997, Finally Adopted 
Resolutions r1-r52, Minutes--PSC/Minutes/004 dated December 1, 1997, 
Intended effective date: June 1, 1998.

    Docket Number: OST-98-3320.
    Date Filed: January 9, 1998.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC12 NMS-ME 0036 dated December 19, 1997, r1-17, PTC12 
NMS-ME 0037 dated December 19, 1997, r18-r35, Minutes--PTC NMS-ME 0035 
dated December 19, 1997, Table--PTC12 NMS-ME Fares 0016 dated January 
6, 1998, Intended effective date: April 1, 1998.
Paulette V. Twine,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 98-1166 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Gencor
Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ E. J. Elliott                                       
|E. J. Elliott                                           
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                    
|                                                        
|May 13, 2011                                            
|                                                        
|/s/ Marc G. Elliott                                     
|Marc G. Elliott                                         
|President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|                                                        
|May 13, 2011                                            



19
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6316

MARIO BALLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAGE TRUE, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-975-7) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Ballard, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Mario Ballard seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(A)(b)(l) (West Supp. 2000) Ballard’s action filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ballard v. True , No. CA-00- 975-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Banco Macro S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                         |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 24, 2017 |  |  |  |                         |  |                        
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | /s/ Jorge Horacio Brito
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                   |  | Jorge Horacio Brito    
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                  |  | Chief Executive Officer