alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41692

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v. 

SANTOS VELA-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-314-1

Before PRADO, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos Vela-Garcia

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vela-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 4, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41692 Document: 00513623557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2016
No. 15-41692

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41692 Document: 00513623557 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/04/2016
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 119 

To prohibit the hiring of additional employees by the Internal Revenue Service 

to implement, administer, or enforce health insurance reform. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. FLEMING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the hiring of additional employees by the Internal 

Revenue Service to implement, administer, or enforce 

health insurance reform. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Out the IRS Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON HIRING ADDITIONAL IRS EMPLOY7 EES TO IMPLEMENT, ADMINISTER, OR EN8 FORCE HEALTH INSURANCE REFORM. 

9 No position within the Internal Revenue Service may 

10 be filled, by transfer or any other appointment taking efVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:45 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H119.IH H119

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 119 IH

1 fect on or after the date of enactment of this Act, if the 

2 duties and responsibilities of such position include the im3 plementation, administration, or enforcement of any provi4 sion of, or amendment made by, the Patient Protection 

5 and Affordable Care Act or the Health Care and Edu6 cation Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31**

 

**WAMU ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORP.**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10–K of WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR1 Trust (the ‘‘Exchange Act periodic reports’’);

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K. 

 

Date:  March 15, 2007

 

  /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann_________Name:  Thomas G. LehmannTitle:    President
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 90 / Monday, May 11, 1998 / Notices 25899

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of the Public Debt

Proposed Collection: Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice and request for

comments.

SUMMARY: The Department of the

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort

to reduce paperwork and respondent

burden, invites the general public and

other Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on proposed

and/or continuing information

collections, as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.

3506(c)(2)(A). Currently the Bureau of

the Public Debt within the Department

of the Treasury is soliciting comments

concerning the Treasury Security

Commercial Tender form.

DATES: Written comments should be

received on or before July 13, 1998, to

be assured of consideration.

ADDRESS: Direct all written comments to

Bureau of the Public Debt, Vicki S.

Thorpe, 200 Third Street, Parkersburg,

WV 26106–1328.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information or

copies of the form and instructions

should be directed to Vicki S. Thorpe,

Bureau of the Public Debt, 200 Third

Street, Parkersburg, WV 26106–1328,

(304) 480–6553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: Treasury Security Commercial

Tender Form

OMB Number: 1535–0112.

Form Number: PD F 5395

Abstract: The information is

requested to process the tenders and to

ensure compliance with regulations.

Current Actions: None

Type of Review: Extension

Affected Public: Individuals, business

or other for profit, or not-for-profit

institutions.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

1,500

Estimated Time Per Respondent: 15

minutes.

Estimated Total Annual Burden

Hours: 375

Request for Comments: Comments

submitted in response to this notice will

be summarized and/or included in the

request for OMB approval. All

comments will become a matter of

public record. Comments are invited on:

(a) Whether the collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

agency, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate

of the burden of the collection of

information; (c) ways to enhance the

quality, utility, and clarity of the

information to be collected; (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on respondents, including

through the use of automated collection

techniques or other forms of information

technology; and (e) estimates of capital

or start-up costs and costs of operation,

maintenance, and purchase of services

to provide information.

Dated: May 5, 1998.

Vicki S. Thorpe,

Manager, Graphics, Printing and Records

Branch.

[FR Doc. 98–12402 Filed 5–8–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–39–P
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|Dated: August 7, 2003 |  | /s/    MICHAEL A.
BRYSON
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                      |  | Name:                   
|                      |  | Title:
_;: 

• 

1930 Huguenot Road 

PO Box35655 

Richmond, VA 23235 

(804) 320-9100 

CowanGates.com 

Federal Aviation Administration 

8PO;Independen~e Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 · · · · · ·· 

Attn: Hearing Do.cket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur, Wright Buildjng-'- Room 2014 

February 19, 2013 

KATHERINE G. GRAY 

(804) 320-9100 

(804) 320-2950 fax 

KGRAY@COWANGATES.COM 

FILE No. 2463-033 

RECEIVED 

MAR 18 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 

Re: Federal Aviation Administration v. Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. 

2012EA210031 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Enclosed please find Central Aviation Inc.'s Answer for filing in the above-styled case. 

Thank you kindly for your assistance in this matter. 

KGG 

Enclosure 

cc: Dennis F. Ha.'Tilp, III 

Zachary M. Berman, Esquire 

Very truly yours, 

Katherine G. Gray 

In any case. 
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPROATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the matter of Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. 

2012EA210031 

Judge Not Assigned 

Central Virginia Aviation, Inc. ("CVA"), by counsel, hereby files its Answer to the Federal 

Aviation Administration's ("FAA") Complaint pursuant to Rule 13.209 ofthe Rules ofPractice (14 

C.F.R. 13.209), and states as follows: 

1. CVA admits the contents ofthe allegations contained in paragraph I of the 

Complaint. CV A denies that it has committed any act which would warrant the imposition of a 

civil penalty in any amount. 

2. CVA denies the allegations contained in paragraphs II(l) through Il(5) of the 

Complaint. 

3. CV A denies the allegations contained in paragraph III of the Complaint. 

Affirmative and Other Defenses 

4. CVA denies each and every allegation contained in the Complaint which is not 

expressly admitted in this Answer. 

5. CVA affirmatively states that it did not have operational control of the aircraft on 

February 4, 2012 or February 7, 2012. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

CENTRAL VIRGINIA AVIATION, INC. 

1 
David H. Gates, Esq. 

Katherine G. Gray, Esq. 

Cowan Gates 

1930 Huguenot Road 

Post Office Box 35655 

Richmond, Virginia 23235 

(804) 320-9100 

(804) 320-2950 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this l<t...., day ofFebruary, 2013, I have mailed via first class, 

postage prepaid, a true and exact copy of the foregoing Answer to: 

Zachary M. Berman, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

2
#### COM. v. RHOADES, M.

3789 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/17/2017

Reargument Denied 10/11/2017

CP-51-CR-0008038-2012

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             16,123
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       6,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                           53
<INVENTORY>                                           587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   24,104
<PP&E>                                            155,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                     80,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     99,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              16,346
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              488
<OTHER-SE>                                         51,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       99,412
<SALES>                                            10,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   11,020
<CGS>                                               3,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       7,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     3,701
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 2,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        2,476
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.51





</TABLE>
Cite as 2022 Ark. 170



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE ARKANSAS SUPREME COU RT

COMMITTEE ON CIVIL P RACTICE Opinion Delivered: September 29, 2022

PER CURIAM

Lee Curry, Esq., of Little Rock is appointed to the Committee on Civil Practice for a

four

- year term to expire on July 31, 2025. The Court thanks Mr. Curry for his willingness

to serv e on this important committee.

The C ourt designates Michelle Kaemmerling, a current member of the committee , to

succeed H. David Blair as Chair. We thank Mr. Blair, whose term has expired, for his years

of valuable service and extend our appreciation to Ms. Kaemmerling for undertaking these

dut ies.
104P17

#### Alonza H. Ward, Jr., and Marie W. Ward v. Laura C. Ward

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA16-832)

2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*

2. Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20
<PP&E>                                             204
<DEPRECIATION>                                     191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      33
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           355
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,923)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        33
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (313)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1174

STEVEN MARTYNUSKA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BWW LAW GROUP, LLC; JON DOE 1-20,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00660-DKC)

Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Martynuska, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Martynuska appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martynuska v. BWW Law Grp., LLC, 

No. 1:19-cv-00660-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2020). We deny Martynuska’s motion to 

appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

April24, 2012 

Richard J. Durden, Esq. 

Richard J. Durden, Attorney at Law 

27987 Richmond Hill Rd . 

. Conifer, CO 80433 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

By Email and First Class Mail 

Re: Frank Hinshaw, Skydiving School, Inc., d/b/a Skydive Hawaii and Island Skydiving, 

LLC v. State ofHawaii, FAA Docket 16-12-04 . 

Dear Mr. Durden: 

We have received your Aprilll, 2012 Motion for Extension of Time requesting a thirty-day 

extension of time in which to file a Reply to the Answer to the Complaint on behalf of the 

Complainant, Frank Hinshaw, Skydiving School, Inc., d/b/a Skydive Hawaii and Island Skydiving, 

LLC, in the above-captioned proceeding. The Complainant's Reply was ·originally due, if filed, on 

April9, 2012, and a tliirty-day extension would make Complainant's Reply due May 9, 2012. 

In your request, you state that the Respondent State of Hawaii is in contact with the Complainant 

regarding "landing skydivers and building a hangar on Upolu Airport." You state that "it appears 

progress is being made" on this matter, and that "Complainants may be in a position to withdraw 

that portion of their Complaint that relates to Upolu Airport," and that a thirty-day extension of 

time may allow this to happen. 

You also state that the Respondent State ofHawaii is "in the process of establishing operational 

procedures for skydiving on Hana Airport," and that a thirty-day extension oftime will allow the 

Complainant to work with the Respondent on this matter and move the process forward. You 

further state that you have contacted Respondent's counsel and that they have no objection to your 

requested extension. 

The FAA favors, as you state in your request, voluntary compliance rather than compelled 

compliance of airport sponsors. The FAA believes that a time extension is appropriate in this 

instance to give the Complainant and Respondent an opportunity to further advance iriformal 

resolution of the dispute at issue in the Complaint. Your request for a thirty~day extension is 

hereby granted, and the Complainant's Reply is now due on or before May 9, 2012. 
s~i. 

Ellen Erichsen 

. Attorney, Airports. Law Branch, AGC-610 

FAA Office of the Chief Counsel 

2 

. i 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on ~ / ~~ , 2012, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the foregoing document addressed to: 

Richard J. Durden, Esq. 

Richard J. Durden, Attorney at Law 

27987 Richmond Hill Rd. 

Conifer, CO 80433 

avlawyer@yahoo.com 

Counsel for Complainant 

Glenn I. Kimm.·a, Esq. 

· Deputy Attorney General 

. Department of the Attorney General, State of Hawaii 

465 S. King Street, 'Room 300 

Honolulu, HI 96813 

glerm.i.kimura@hawaii.gov 

Counsel for Respondent 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (internal mail) 

Office of Airport Compliance, AC0-1 00 (internal mail) 

baron Long 

Airports and Environmental Law Division 

Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

3
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Review Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : 

# Jj^^ " I rt^-ot-v

^ ^v)^ffo^cf ^ RIN : 

# 0^(c5^'^cy4 j Wit hrespec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.O . 12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee n met i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e of Informatio n an d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio n i s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulatory Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t fo r th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O (§801 ) hav e bee n met i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

^^^ ^ Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . __^^ ^ Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . ?y ^ Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio n t o Congres s an dGAO . Signatur e Nam e Title/Offic e 

# \W WV Dat e
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 130




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sekoya Holdings Ltd. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:






1. The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






February
                12, 2008
            By:/s/
                "Shirley Wong"Shirley
                Wong, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.