alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1323 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1323

  To extend the suspension of duty on certain diamond tool and drill 
                    blanks, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 30 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Glenn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the suspension of duty on certain diamond tool and drill 
                    blanks, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    Heading 9902.71.04 (relating to certain diamond tool and drill 
blanks) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 
amended by striking out ``12/31/92'' and inserting ``12/31/95''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    (a) In General.--The amendment made by this Act applies with 
respect to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
    (b) Reliquidation.--Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act 
of 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with 
the appropriate customs officer on or before the 90th day after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, any entry of an article described in 
subheading 9902.71.04 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States that was made--
            (1) after December 31, 1992, and
            (2) before the date which is 15 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though such entry occurred on or 
after the date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph COLLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2506

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 19, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Jon B. Morgan, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Indiana Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Indiana Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18,673
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 18,673 | 54,255 | 55,684 | 32,280 | 32,080 | 32,439 | 32,804 | 32,804 | 32,946 | 32,946
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30,003 | 30,003 | 30,003 | 30,003 | 30,003 | 30,003 | 30,003 | 31,440 | 31,690 | 32,679
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 32,757 | 33,235 | 33,307 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Maine Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Maine Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |        |        |        | 6,290  | 5,716  | 6,572 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 44,779 | 95,733 | 101,536 | 70,832 | 72,565 | 57,835 | 49,605 | 63,183 | 70,146 | 70,334
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 77,575 | 71,690 | 68,266  | 64,091 | 60,663 | 52,777 | 53,128 | 43,810 | 46,464 | 44,606
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 45,262 | 54,979 | 58,994  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Waiver Letter, dated September 6, 2011, to a loan agreement dated May 13, 2008



 Exhibit 4.66 

 
 



 
 Norwalk Star Owners Inc. 
 & Ionian Traders Inc. 
 c/o Dryships Inc. 

80 Kifissias Avenue 
 Marousi 

Athens – 15125 
 Greece 

USD 125 million Secured Loan Facility Agreement dated 13 May 2008 as amended from time to time (the “Loan Agreement”) – MVs
Capri & Positano (the “Vessels”) – Security Value Clause 
 6 September 2011

 Dear Sirs 
 We refer to clause 10.4
of the Loan Agreement and the related recent correspondence between your goodselves and us as Agent of the Facility. 
 With the market value of
the Vessels being USD 67 million and an outstanding loan amount of USD 57.75 million on the covenant testing day as per schedule attached the lending banks have agreed on your payment of the shortfall amounting to USD 5,187,500 to be
applied to the next instalments for avoidance of a covenant breach. 
 As one repayment instalment of USD 2,250,000 has meanwhile been due and
made, kindly remit the remaining amount of USD 2,937,500. These funds will be applied to the next scheduled instalments, fully on 26 September 2011 (USD 2,250,000) and the remainder of USD 687,500 on 23 December 2011. 







 If you are agreeable to the terms above would you please countersign this letter and send it back.

 Kind regards 

	
	Deutsche Schiffsbank AG
	
	 /s/ Illegible

	
	Acknowledged and agreed
	
	 /s/ EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU

	EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU
	Attorney in fact
	(Norwalk Star Owners, Inc.)
	
	Acknowledged and agreed
	
	 /s/ EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU

	EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU
	Attorney in fact
	(Ionian Traders Inc.)
	
	Acknowledged and agreed
	
	 /s/ EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU

	EUGENIA PAPAPONTIKOU
	Attorney in fact
	(Dryships Inc. as Guarantor)
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DECEMBER 6, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-11082

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00270-CR-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC DESHON WHITE,

a.k.a. “E”,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(December 6, 2007)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Arthur J. Madden III, appointed counsel for Eric Deshon White in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
2

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and White’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Tennessee Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Tennessee Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 355    | 753    | 986   
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 1,265  | 1,524  | 1,150  | 1,263  | 1,087  | 387    | 537    | 509    | 516    | 616   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 78     | 113    | 153    | 138    | 98     | 93     | 60     | 45    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 74     | 44     | 39     | 49     | 44     | 47     | 37     | 45     | 31     |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
109P17

#### In Re Olander R. Bynum

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed
#### COM. v. RANKINS, W.

3235 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/10/2017

CP-23-CR-0002037-2004 (Delaware)

Vacated/Remanded
# MDE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard. Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000. 1-800-633-6101

Martin O'Malley Governor Anthony G. Brown Lieutenant Governor

Donald S. Welsh Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 3 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103
DearMr. Welsh: 

## JUN .- 42007 Shari T. Wilson Secretary
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary

The purpose ofthis letter is to submit copies ofthe Baltimore Nonattainment Area 8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan and Base Year Inventory (SIP# 07-04). This air quality plan shows howthe Baltimore Nonattainment Area expects to meet the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
A public hearing for this submission was held in Baltimore, Maryland on May 22, 2007. All required administrative procedures were followed throughout the hearing process. Ifyou have any questions concerning these submissions, please feel free to call George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director ofthe Air and Radiation Management Administration at (410) 537-3255. Very truly yours,

# il**!d L**  Secretary
Enclosures

cc: Judy Katz, Director, Air Protection Division, EPA Region III George (Tad) Aburn, Jr. , Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration, MDE Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE Brian Hug, Deputy Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE**~** Recycled Paper www.mde.state.md

.us TTY Users 1·800·735·2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
No. 12-316.

#### In re Lipin.

Petition for writ of mandamus and/ or prohibition denied.
exhibit10-28.htm












Exhibit 10.28














 


December 13, 2011


 


Shawn K. Poe


122 Westongate Way


Cary, NC 27513


 







 


Re:           Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement


 


Dear Shawn:


 


This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated November 7, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2012.


 


Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.


 








	  	
Sincerely,


	  	  
	  	
PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.


	  	  
	  	
By:     /s/ Gary E. Robinette                             


	  	
Name:  Gary E. Robinette


	  	
Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer


	  	  
	  	  
	
Acknowledged and Agreed:

	  
	  	  
	
/s/ Shawn K. Poe                  

	  
	
Shawn K. Poe
#### Jonathan LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2949

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Alan S. Apte, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### COM. v. RIVERA, R.

1414 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-38-CR-0000424-2015

(Lebanon)

Affirmed
#### H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, LLC v. CELTIC CROSS CONSTRUCTION, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili

NO. 17-CA-344

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

November 29, 2017

*729COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPEL-LEE, H3 AESTHETICS AND DERMATOLOGY, Stephen K. Conroy, Amanda D. Hogue

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT, MISHA KACHKACHISHVI-LI, Leslie J. Hill

Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Grávois, Marc E. Johnson, and Robert A. Chaisson

CHAISSON, J.

I t On July 15, 2016, HB Aesthetics and Dermatology, LLC (“H3”), filed a petition for damages in the 24th Judicial District Court in Jefferson Parish naming as defendants Celtic Cross Construction, LLC and Misha Kachkachishvili in a dispute arising out of a construction buildout of doctor’s offices and medical spa on property located on Bienville Street in New Orleans.

During the course of the litigation, H3 filed a motion to compel discovery wherein it requested the trial court to compel Mr. Kachkachishvili to respond to interrogatories and requests for production that it had propounded upon him. Four days before the scheduled hearing on the motion to compel, Mr. Kachkachishvili produced responses to the discovery. After the hearing on the motion, the trial court rendered judgment in which it declared the Motion to Compel Discovery moot because Mr. Kachkachishvili had produced the discovery responses; however, the trial court ordered Mr. Kachkachishvili to pay attorney’s fees and costs associated with the motion. It is froni that portion of the judgment that ordered‘ him to pay attorney’s fees and costs that Mr. Kachkachishvili now appeals.

DISCUSSION

.Pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article. 1841, a judgment that does not determine the merits of a case but only' preliminary matters in the course of the action is an interlocutory judgment. An interlocutory judgment is appealable only when expressly provided by law. La. C.C.P. art. 2083(C). A judgment declaring a motion to compel discovery moot and awarding attorney’s fees and costs for the bringing of that motion is an interlocutory judgment. *Gorvine v. Travelers Ins. Cos.,*98-0287 (La. App. 4 Cir. 11/18/98), 724 So.2d 248, 250; *Succession of Holliday,*576 So.2d 1155, 1156 (La. App. 3 Cir. 1991), *writ denied,*581 So.2d 708 (La. 1991). We therefore have no appellate jurisdiction to consider the merits of the trial court’s ruling. An appeal may be dismissed at any time for | Jack of jurisdiction of the appellate court. La. C.C.P. art. 2162; *Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Chopin,*16-244 (La. App. 5 Cir. 12/07/16), 207 So.3d 631; *O’Krepki v. O’Krepki,*17-130 (La. Ápp. 5 Cir. 10/25/17), 229 So.3d 647, 2017 WL 4799981, 2017 La. App. LEXIS 2047. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Trulite, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Wade Stubblefield,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By:
              /s/ G.
                  Wade StubblefieldG.
                  Wade StubblefieldPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
                May 18, 2007
Order entered January 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 01365 - CV UNITED MEDICAL SUPPL Y COMPANY, INC., Appellant V. ANSELL HEALTHCARE PR ODUCTS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 02 - 0433 - C 

### O RDER The Court has before it the request of Antionette Reagor, official court reporter for the 68th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The Court GRAN TS the request and ORDERS Ms. Reagor to file the reporter’s record by January 14, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### Earnest DIALS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1323

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. John L. Miller, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         573,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,966,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,059,117
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,966,303
<SALES>                                      1,253,566
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,273,287
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,121,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>