alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Arizona Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Transported   (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Arizona Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Transported   (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 1      | 0      | 13     | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 6      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 10.20**

** **

**Hawaiian Telcom &Accenture CONFIDENTIAL**

** **

**AmendmentNumber One**

** **

**To ApplicationServices Agreement**

** **

**March 12,2007**

** **

----

 

**AMENDMENTNUMBER ONE**

 

**TOAPPLICATION SERVICES AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendment Number One (“Amendment”),effective as of March 12, 2007 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), isbetween Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. (“Hawaiian Telcom”) andAccenture LLP (“Accenture”). Accenture and Hawaiian Telcom may be referred toin this Amendment individually as “Party” and together as “Parties.”

 

The Parties entered intothat certain Application Services Agreement, effective as of February 5,2007 (the “Agreement”), which the Parties now desire to amend.

 

The Parties agree to modify and amend the Agreement, as follows:

 

1.     **NewStatement of Work:** Exhibit B-6, Billing Fallout Queue Management,is added to the Agreement as a new Statement of Work. Exhibit B-6 isattached  to this Amendment as AttachmentA.

 

2.     **DefinedTerms:** Any terms not defined in this Amendment will have the same meaning asin the Agreement.

 

3.     **Effect of Amendment:**  Unless otherwise amended herein, all termsand conditions of the Agreement remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed by and onbehalf of the Parties hereto as of the Effective Date.

 

**HAWAIIAN TELCOM COMMUNICATIONS,INC.**

 
| By:    | /s/ Paul H. Sunu                        |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
| Name:  | Paul H. Sunu                            |
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
| Title: | SVP & Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
| Date:  | August 31, 2007                    |
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |

 

2

----

 

**Accenture LLP**

 
| By:    | /s/ Timothy A. Hale  |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   |                 |
|   |                 |
| Name:  | Timothy A. Hale      |
|   |                 |
|   |                 |
| Title: | Partner              |
|   |                 |
|   |                 |
| Date:  | August 30, 2007 |
|   |                 |

 

3

----
335P16

#### State v. Gyrell Shavonta Lee

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1352)

Allowed
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|New Hampshire Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|New Hampshire Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 20,848 | 19,127 | 20,313
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 24,950 | 23,398 | 24,901 | 54,147 | 61,172 | 70,484 | 62,549 | 62,132 | 71,179 | 59,950
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 60,378 | 69,978 | 72,032 | 54,028 | 57,018 | 68,682 | 57,957 | 52,071 | 49,888 | 53,650
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 51,966 | 58,252 | 58,135 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. RENTERIA, E.

2656 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/02/2017

CP-15-CR-0003746-2015 (Chester)

Affirmed
Summary Sheet for Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Summary Sheet for Director Compensation 
 March 14, 2012

 The Company pays its Chairman of the Board an annual retainer of $70,000. It also pays or reimburses him for the cost of office space
that has a rental value of approximately $13,000 per year and provides coverage to him and his domestic partner under the Company’s self-insured medical, dental and vision plan. The Company pays each of its other non-employee directors an
annual retainer of $30,000. The chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual fee of $20,000. The chairs of each of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive an additional annual fee of
$15,000. Non-chair members of these committees receive an additional $5,000 annual fee for each committee on which they serve. 
 All director
fees are payable in advance in equal quarterly installments and are currently paid via shares of the Company’s common stock based on the closing market price on the regularly scheduled quarterly payment date. 

In addition to annual fees, each non-employee director is entitled to receive, at or following each annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, a
grant of stock of the Company valued at $25,000. 
 In line with the Company’s operating strategy, and as with all salaried employees
including senior management, the Company’s directors have accepted since the second quarter of 2009 a 5% reduction in the amount of the fees and stock grants described above. 
 In addition to fees and stock grants, it is the Company’s policy to reimburse directors for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service on the Board and its committees.
#### Terry GAYNOR, Appellant, v. Meco GAYNOR inod & obo Octavius B. Thornton, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1426

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed December 29, 2017

Terry Gaynor, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges .an order summarily denying his motion, to dissolve a domestic violence injunction. In his motion, he alleged that the injunction had served its purpose and was no longer necessary because he had not had any contact with the other party for the past 8 years, and he did not have any reason to be in contact with her in the future. He further alleged he had a change in circumstances because he was currently imprisoned, and the'injunction prevented him from participating in re-entry and work release programs. His motion was legally sufficient, and thüs the court’s summary denial without affording appellant a meaningful opportunity to be ‘ heard violated due process requirements. See Kugler v. Joosten, 58 So.3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DOA 2010). Thus, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and WOLF and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee; Meeting Cancellation

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that the 
January 22, 1998, meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
(ARAC) scheduled to discuss general aviation operations issues (63 FR 
122, January 2, 1998) has been cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Noreen Hannigan, Office of Rulemaking (ARM-106), Federal Aviation 
Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20591; 
telephone (202) 267-7476; fax (202) 267-5075.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 13, 1998.
Louis C. Cusimano,
Assistant Executive Director for General Aviation Operations, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 98-1223 Filed 1-14-98; 1:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
g

, 

Missouri Department on Natural Resources PO Box 176 

1101 Riverside Drive 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0176 

Dear Ms. Moore: 

Thank you for the recommendations regarding the attainment status selected areas in Missouri under the 

2010 sulfur dioxide national ambient air quality standard that your agency sent us on September 25, 2015. As you know, we are subject to a March 2, 2015, court order directing us to promulgate SOz 

designations for these areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically, we are 

required to promulgate designations for these areas because they contain sources meeting the SOz 

emissions criteria identified in the consent decree. The information you provided on September 25, 

2015, will greatly help us meet this duty, and ensure protection of public health in Missouri. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the area near the following power plants: 

Ameren Labadie Power Plant and KCP&L Sibley Generating Station. We have already provided this 

information to your staff. Please let us know if you have any questions about the information we have 

received or if you need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that the 

Environmental Protection Agency can base its designations decisions on the best available information. 

The Clean Air Act provides for designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and 

the EPA; however, we also believe it is important to consider significant and relevant information that 

members of the public provide to us. Consistent with the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that 

the best first step in addressing this information would be for your agency to provide its review of this 

information. Since the Sierra Club's recommendation differs from your recommendation, we would 

welcome your commentary generally on the information as well as your detailed review of the elements 

of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent practicable, we would appreciate quantitative comparisons of 

data used in Sierra Club's analysis compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us evaluate the 

elements of the two analyses. 

®Printed on Recycled Paper 
Becky Weber Director 

Air and Waste Management Division
**Certification**

I, Shirley Wong, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board of Sekoya Holdings Ltd. (the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of the Company.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and have:

    a.    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byother within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

    b.    (paragraph omitted pursuantto SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;)

    c.    evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

    d.    disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the Company's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting ; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of theCompany's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

    b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ "Shirley Wong"

Shirley Wong

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

January 29, 2007
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|New Jersey Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|New Jersey Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 317    | 1,117  | 189    | -209   | 1,468  | 253    | 1,916  | -185   | 40     | -1,011
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,442  | 461    | -49    | 307    | 1,270  | 73     | 1,814  | 596    | 617    | 283   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 187    | 112    | 1,596  | -2,634 | -1,929 | -2,534 | -894   | 1,776  | -178   | 494   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -390   | 613    | 205    | 193    | 515    | 1,545  | 1,297  | 640    | 1,826  | 591   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 547    | 593    | 1,135  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Walter L. PENDERS and Flora Penders, Appellees.

No. 12425.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 27, 1950.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Eugene H. O’Donnell, Robert E. Halsing, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before BIGGS and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges, and DRIVER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented by the appeal in the instant case are entirely those of fact. They have been resolved in favor of the appellees and against the United States after careful consideration by the learned trial judge. We can find no substantial error in the proceeding. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.