alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Michigan Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Michigan Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.70   | 0.61   | 1.12   | 1.19   | 3.52   | 3.23   | 3.12  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.59   | 2.49   | 2.58   | 2.01   | 2.44   | 2.23   | 1.76   | 1.81   | 1.40   | 1.22  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.53   | 1.49   | 1.99   | 1.35   | 1.37   | 1.73   | 2.43   | 2.30   | 2.40   | 2.45  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.59   | 2.25   | 2.59   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6093.

#### Mata-Rosales *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Connecticut Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Connecticut Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2      | 2,709  | 2,818  | 2,908 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3,061  | 2,921  | 2,923  | 2,952  | 3,754  | 3,705  | 3,435  | 3,459  | 3,441  | 3,465 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,683  | 3,881  | 3,716  | 3,625  | 3,470  | 3,437  | 3,393  | 3,317  | 3,196  | 3,138 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,063  | 3,062  | 3,148  | 4,454  | 4,217  | 3,945  | 3,776  | 3,599  | 3,235  | 3,181 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,111  | 2,964  | 2,822  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60410 Summary Calendar

WILLIAM FRAZIER Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

(4:95-CV-110-LN) November 11, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant Frazier sued Appellee National Union to recover punitive damages under Mississippi law for failure to properly pay
state workers’ compensation benefits. Following the partial grant of Appellee’s m otion to strike certain of Appellant’s evidence submitted in opposition to Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment,2

the district court granted su mmary judgment for Appellee. We affirm. The district court found that there was no issue of material fact that National Union was reasonable in its position that
F razier’s claim for compensation benefits was barred by the applicabl e period of prescription. Since its actions were reasonable, there was no predicate for awarding punitive damages for failure t o pay; despite the fact that the Mississippi Commissioner ultimately found that the claim was not barred by prescription. We have carefully reviewed the record and Judge
Lee’s detailed opinion and find no error. The issue is not whether National Union’s decision was correc t but only whether it was reasonable under the circumstances. Likewise, we find no error in the district court’s ruling on the Motion to Strike.
We affirm the decision of the district court essentially for the reasons given by it.
AFFIRMED.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 29     | 26     | 43     | 39     | 41     | 51    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 69     | 71     | 87     | 97     | 19     | 15     | 17     | 15     | 12    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 7      | 7      | 41     | 62     | 68     | 140    | 446    | 457    | 501   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 428    | 549    | 560    | 458    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
** **

** EXHIBIT 10.1**

**MENTOR CORPORATION**

**WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS FEESPURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF REGULATION S-K**

Each non-employee member ofthe Board of Directors of Mentor Corporation receives a quarterly fee of$12,500, equaling a total annual fee of $50,000.  The PresidingIndependent Director receives an additional $5,000 per quarter, bringing thetotal annual fee for the Presiding Independent Director to $70,000.   TheChairperson of the audit committee receives an additional $5,000 per year;bring the total annual fee for the Chairperson to $55,000. In addition, underthe Company's 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan, each non-employee member of theBoard of Directors is eligible to receive options to purchase shares of theCompany's common stock. 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1313

  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel MYSTIQUE.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 29 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel MYSTIQUE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
MYSTIQUE, United States official number 921194.

                                 <all>
```
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|South Carolina Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|South Carolina Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,447  | 1,495 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,508  | 1,486  | 1,389  | 1,382  | 1,352  | 1,344  | 1,317  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,139  | 1,137  | 1,215  | 1,223  | 1,215  | 1,238  | 1,236  | 1,190  | 1,202  | 1,202 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,189  | 1,188  | 1,225  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. WOODALL, E.

110 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/20/2017

Reargument 9/7/2017

CP-02-CR-0008320-1996

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 99.9   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION



I, Paul Esposito, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Famous Uncle Als Hot Dogs & Grille, Inc. (the Company);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of  the  Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability trecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.





/s/   Paul Esposito

Paul Esposito

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer



June 5, 2009
#### Andrew JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3400

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Joseph A, Bulone, Judge.

Affirmed.
173P17

#### State v. Melvin Leroy Fowler

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 06/05/2017

2.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

The undersigned, Edward Zimmerman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of EZJR, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  March 28, 2007

                                           /s/ Edward Zimmerman, Jr.
                                           ------------------------
                                               Edward Zimmerman, Jr.
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                      |  |                     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ Robert P. Kelly
|                      |  | Name:               |  | Robert P. Kelly        
|                      |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00067

- CR

SHATERICA VENISHA JOHNSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 47066

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Shaterica Venisha Johnson has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal. As

authorized by Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , we grant the motion. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: July 16, 2018

Date Decided: July 17, 2018

Do Not Publish