alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Federal Offshore--Gulf of Mexico Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36,147 | 33,831 | 23,232
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 33,307 | 16,776 | 15,593 | 20,791 | 13,829 | 4,929  | 0      | 1,969  | 1,105  | 432   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 110    | 3,084  | 4,014  | 2,832  | 5,485  | 4,839  | 4,920  | 4,033  | 3,909  | 4,296 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,652  | 1,723  | 2,855  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 10.168




SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE




This agreement is made as of this
day     of July, 2010 by and between Kingfisher, LLC,
(hereinafter the “Landlord”), and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc., (hereinafter the
“Tenant”, as assignee of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (hereinafter the
“Assignor”)).




PRELIMINARY
STATEMENT




The Landlord and Assignor entered
into a lease (The “Lease”) dated April 2, 2001, and amended by First Amendment
to Lease dated March 13, 2005, Second Amendment to Lease dated December 12,
2005, Third Amendment to Lease dated August 7, 2006, Fourth Amendment to Lease
dated August 6, 2007, Fifth Amendment to Lease dated March 31, 2009 and Sixth
Amendment to Lease, which was executed by Landlord, Assignor and Tenant, dated
January 1, 2010 (hereinafter the “Lease and Amendments”) for certain Premises at
431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York, consisting of 20,000 Net Usable Square
Feet. Tenant desires to extend the current lease term for an additional 6
months.




Accordingly, the parties agree to
amend and modify the Lease and Amendments as hereinafter set forth:




1.
            
            The current Lease Term shall be extended
      to expire February 28, 2011.2.
            
            The Base Rent through February 28, 2011
      shall be $10.50 per Net Useable Square
Feet.





Except as modified
herby, all terms and conditions of the Lease and Amendments are hereby ratified
and confirmed by the parties hereto.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF Landlord and Tenant have signed and sealed this Modification to Lease as of the
day and year first above written.




Landlord:KINGFISHER, LLCBy: Edward L. Hoe, Jr., Member
      ManagerTenant:MTI MICROFUEL CELLS
  INC.By: Peng K. Lim, Chief Executive
      Officer


---
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|California Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|California Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 916    | 476    | 495    | 496    | 526    | 227    | 23     | 19     | 20     | 18    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 19     | 51     | 37     | 94     | 72     | 50     | 109    | 150    | 117   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 36     | 60     | 37     | 42     | 36     | 50     | 76     | 202    | 42     | 46    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 54     | 66     | 36     | 92     | 82     | 51     | 42     | 73     | 36     | 59    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34     | 57     | 38     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|No chart available.                                                                
|No chart available.                                                                
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Wyoming Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Nevada Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Nevada Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.31   | 0.35   | 0.36   | 0.37   | 0.10   | 0.12   | 0.15  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.14   | 0.16   | 0.15   | 0.15   | 0.16   | 0.21   | 0.21   | 0.20   | 0.19   | 0.19  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.16   | 0.16   | 0.16   | 0.18   | 0.22   | 0.24   | 0.24   | 0.24   | 0.24   | 0.25  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.24   | 0.21   | 0.22   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
247P16-2

#### Jonathan Eugene Brunson v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety’s Superintendent Felix Taylor of Pasquotank Correctional Institution and State of North Carolina, *et al.*

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*•

Denied 02/15/2017
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. EC96-19-023 and ER96-1663-024]


The California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
Filing

April 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1998, the California Independent 
System Operator Corporation (ISO), filed for Commission acceptance in 
this docket, pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, an 
application to amend the ISO Tariff, including the ISO Protocols, and a 
motion for waiver of the 60-day notice requirement. The ISO requests 
that the proposed amendments be made effective as of the ISO Operations 
Date.
    The ISO states that Amendment No. 7 would provide (1) certain 
changes relating to the transmission priority of Reliability Must-Run 
Generation and Existing Contracts; (2) temporary rule limiting 
Adjustment Bids applicable to Dispatchable Loads and exports; (3) a 
temporary rule disqualifying certain Energy bids; and (4) a 
clarification relating to the Reliability Must-Run Charge.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before May 1, 1998. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
petition to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the 
Commission and available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11299 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
309P15-2

#### State v. Reginald Underwood Fullard

Def's *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Direct Review (COAP14-265)

Dismissed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1842
JAMES JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; DARRELL V. MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General of West Virginia; SUE SURGI, Commissioner, West Virginia Department of Human Services; DENNY P. PENTONY, Social Service Coordinator; BOB G. FAIL, Protective Service Worker; D. A. JE NKINS, West Virginia State Trooper; SO LAN BOMBITA, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-96-70-3) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHI LLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Lucien Garlow Lewin, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Martinsburg, West Virginia; So Lan Bombita, Falling Waters, West Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jackson v. West Virginia , No. CA-96-70-3 (N.D.W. Va. May 28, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to stay a state court order. We dispensewith oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 46    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 46     | 47     | 43     | 42     | 43     | 43     | 43     | 43     | 43     | 43    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 43     | 43     | 43     | 43     | 43     | 42     | 42     | 42     | 42     | 42    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 42     | 42     | 42     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## NO. 12 - 23 - 00312 -CV I N THE COURT OF APPEALS TW ELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TY LER, TEXAS CORNELIUS BUTLER, I

NDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF BETTY BUTLER , APPELLANT V. TYLE R OPS LTC., INC. D/B/A PETAL HILL NURSING & REHABILITATION , APPELL EE §
§
§ APPEAL FROM THE 241ST

J

UD ICIAL DISTRICT COURT

S

MITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM T his appeal is being di smissed for fa i lure t o comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order , or a notic e from the cle rk requiring a response or other action within a specified time

. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c). A party who is not excused by statute or the appellate rules from paying costs must pay

-- at the time an item is presented for filing

-- wh ateve r fees ar e required by s ta tute or Texas Supreme Court order. T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 ; see T EX . R. A PP . P. 20.1 . An appellate court may en force Ru le 5 by any or der that is ju st. T EX . R. A PP . P. 5. A fter giving ten days ’ notice , an appellate court may dism iss an appea l because the appellant failed to comply wit h a requiremen t o f the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a speci fied ti me. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c). On December 15 , 2023 , the Clerk o f this Cour t n otified Appellant, Cornelius Butler, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Betty Butler , that the filing fee in th is appeal is due2 and that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if the fee was not paid on or before December 27. The date for remitti ng th e fi lin g fee p assed, and Appell ant has not paid the fee or othe rwi se shown that he is exc u sed from paying the fee

. 1 B ecause Appellant f ailed, after notice, to comply with Rule 5, the appeal is dismissed

. 2 See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c).

O pinion delivered January 10, 2024. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 The cas e information s he e t from the Smith County Di strict Clerk ’s Office reflects that Appel lant was not declared indigent in the trial court.
2 Nor has Appellant filed the required docketin g statement. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 32.1.

## COURT OF AP PEALS TW ELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRI CT OF TEXAS J UDGMENT

J ANUARY 10, 2024
NO . 12-23-00312- CV
CO RNELIUS BUTLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BE HALF OF THE ESTATE OF BETTY BUTLER , Appellant V. TYLER OPS LTC., INC. D/B/A PETAL HILL NURSING & REHABILITATION , A ppellee Appeal from the 241st District Court of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 21-1988-C) THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellat e recor d; and the same being considered, it is the opi nion of this Court th at this appea l sh ould be d ismissed

. It is ther efore O RDERED, A D JUDGED an d DECRE ED by this Court th at the appeal be , a nd the same is, hereb y dismissed ; and that this decision be certified t o the court below for observance.
B y per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.