alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      Of Title 18 of the United States Code

I, Ralph F. Hake, the Chief Executive Officer of Maytag Corporation, certify
that (i) the Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the foregoing report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Maytag Corporation.

                                /s/ Ralph F. Hake
                                -----------------
                                Ralph F. Hake, Chief Executive Officer

                                November 13, 2002
                                -----------------
                                Date

                                      -27-
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, **Tim T. Esaki**, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   TIM T. ESAKI            |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Tim   T. Esaki                |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer     |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                          |   |
| Date:   May 4, 2011      |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 Company
 1.
    
    The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the  Report ) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date:
June 30, 2008
    
    /s/ Jorge Horacio Brito

Name: Jorge Horacio BritoTitle: Chief Executive Officer
Continued Airworthiness Notification to the International Community 

To: Civil Aviation Authorities Date: December 22, 2009 

From: Federal Aviation Administration

New England Region, ANE-100 

Engine and Propeller Directorate 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

Subject: This message is to advise you of FAA’s ongoing activities related to General Electric 

Company CF34-1A, CF34-3A, and CF34-3B series turbofan engines. 

Accident/ Incident Description: We have received reports of certain part number and serial 

number fan blades failing on CF34 series engines. The first failure also included an under-cowl 

fire that caused extensive damage to the engine. Although we haven’t been able to determine the 

exact cause of the under-cowl fire because of the thermal damage, the investigation revealed two 

problems; a fan blade failed at the platform tang and the aft actuator head hose failed. The 

investigation also revealed that the accessory gearbox had separated from the engine, possibly 

contributing to the actuator hose failure. We traced the failed fan blades to a specific supplier and 

their billet material. The investigation found that the billet alloy material met specifications and 

the supplier’s approved processes were different from other suppliers approved processes. This 

condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of certain P/N and S/N fan blades and aft 

actuator head hoses, which could result in an under-cowl fire and subsequent damage to the 

airplane.

Aircraft/ Engine Make, Model and Series: These engines are installed on, but not limited to, 

Bombardier Canadair Models CL-600-2A12, CL-600-2B16, and CL-600-2B19 airplanes.

U.S.-registered fleet: 1,966 turbofan engines; Worldwide fleet: 3,832 turbofan engines.

Operators: Various operators. 

Ongoing activities: We issued AD 2009-24-11 on November 18, 2009, to address the unsafe 

condition. We are sending this advisory because we are changing the AD to reduce the number of 

fan blades that the final rule AD applies to.

Next update, if any: None. 

Directorate Contact: 

Francis A. Favara, Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate. 

Telephone: (781) 238-7100

FAX: (781) 238-7199

Note: This information is for the use of civil aviation authorities only and should not be 

released to the public at this time.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS GALE C. HUTCHINSON, JR. , Appellant,

v
. FARMERS INSURANCE, FREDIE J. WORTHEY A/K/A FRED J. WORTHEY, FRED WORTHEY INSURANCE AGENCY, JUSTIN JAMES WORTHEY, WIA AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, BRENDA WORTHEY, AND LISA SMITH , Appellee s
. §

§ § § § § § § No. 08

- 15

- 001 40

- CV

Appeal from the
191st District Court
of Dallas County, Texas (TC# DC

- 14

- 07429 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION This appeal is before the Court to determine whether it has jurisdiction. Finding that the orders sought to be appealed are not subject to an interlocutory appeal, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments and interlocutory orders made appeal able by statute. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corporation , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); T EX .C IV .P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.014 (West 2015)(authorizing appeals from certain interlocutory orders). A final judgment is one that disposes of all pending parties and c laims. See Lehmann , 39 S.W.3d at 195. The notice of appeal states that Appellant, Gale C. Hutchinson, Jr., is appealing the trial- 2

-

court’s orders (1) denying his motion for continuance, (2) granting Appellee Farmers Insurance Exchange’s motion to strike and for judgment, and (3) granting the special exceptions of defendants Fredie Worthey, Fred J. Worthey, Fred Worthey Insurance Agenc y, WIA and Associates, LLC, Lisa Smith, and Brenda Worthey, and ordering Appellant to replead. The Fifth Court of Appeals, prior to transferring the appeal to this Court pursuant to a docket equalization order, sent Appellant a letter notifying him that t he clerk’s record did not contain a final judgment or appealable order and asking him to file a response explaining how the court of appeals has jurisdiction over the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.3. Appellant and Appellee Farmers Insurance Exchange have f iled responses to the F ifth Court of Appeals’ letter. The record does not reflect that the trial court has entered a final judgment and Appellant does not suggest otherwise. The orders Appellant seeks to appeal are interlocutory but there is no statutory authority for an interlocutory appeal of any of the orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the ap peal for want of jurisdiction.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice May 13, 2015 Before McClure, C. J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-
KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and filed
with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-KSB/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-KSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 27, 2008
        ---------------
                                           /s/ T J Jesky
                                           ---------------------------
                                               T J Jesky
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 99,596  | 103,647
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 110,961 | 110,680 | 113,603 | 115,655 | 117,678 | 112,725 | 117,017 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 128,256 | 121,065 | 124,099 | 124,963 | 120,803 | 121,754 | 122,059 | 122,743 | 123,887 | 123,936
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 149,976 | 123,973 | 140,478 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM v. DABNEY, J.

1447 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/14/2017

CP-51-CR-0000988-2015

CP-51-CR-0000989-2015

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
|                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History: Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                       
|                                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                                 
|No chart available.                                                                 
|                                                                                    
|                                                                                    
|Mississippi Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                                  
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Texas--State Offshore Natural Gas Withdrawals from Coalbed Wells (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 24, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 24, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0413. ULTRA GROUP OF COMPANIES, INC. v. INAM INTERNATIONAL ET AL..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV302839
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

HOUTZ, COGLEY, and MYERS

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Jamal A. BULLARD

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202100277

_________________________

Decided: 30 August 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judges: 

Nicholas S. Henry (arraignment, trial) 

Keaton H. Harrell (motions)

Sentence adjudged 25 June 2021 by a general court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of officer and enlisted members. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 13 months1, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant:

Lieutenant Commander Daniel O. Moore, JAGC, USN

 

1 Appellant was credited with serving 248 days of pre-trial confinement.
United States v. Bullard, NMCCA No. 202100277

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

S. TAYLOR JOHNSTON

Interim Clerk of Court

 

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
No. 12-6727.

#### Kohlmeyer *v.*Indiana.

Ct. App. Ind. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-6661.

#### Richardson *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Yezhak Dov Knoll, Respondent, v Datek Securities Corporation et al., Appellants.

[769 NYS2d 581]

In an action to recover brokerage commissions, the defendants *595appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mason, J.), dated August 8, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss as time-barred the plaintiffs claims for commissions accruing before November. 13, 1995.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a trial on the issues raised by that branch of the motion which was to dismiss as time-barred the plaintiffs claim for commissions accruing before November 13, 1995, and for a determination thereafter of that branch of the motion.

The plaintiff commenced this action in November 2001 to recover brokerage commissions, some of which accrued before 1995. The defendants moved, inter alia, to dismiss the plaintiffs claims for commissions accruing before November 13, 1995, asserting that they were time-barred pursuant to CPLR 213 (2). The Supreme Court denied that branch of the motion. We reverse.

In opposition to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiff submitted commission analysis statements, arguing that the statements were written acknowledgments sufficient to take the action outside the statute of limitations *(see*General Obligations Law § 17-101).

To constitute an acknowledgment of a debt, a writing must recognize an existing debt and contain nothing inconsistent with an intention on the part of the debtor to pay it *(see Morris Demolition Co. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*40 NY2d 516, 521 [1976]). In determining the effectiveness of an acknowledgment, the critical determination is whether the acknowledgment imports an intention to pay *(see Estate of Vengroski v Garden Inn,*114 AD2d 927, 928 [1985]). A trial is required to ascertain the defendants’ intent in listing a balance on the commission analysis statements and whether the commission analysis documents constitute written acknowledgments of a debt sufficient to take the action outside the statute of limitations *(see*General Obligations Law § 17-101; CPLR 3211 [c]). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to conduct a trial on the issues raised by that branch of the motion, and for a determination thereafter of that branch of the motion. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.