alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. David Irving, Admitted on June 9,1987, at a Term of the Appellate Division, First Department.

[771 NYS2d 340]

Respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Williams, JJ. *[See*247 AD2d 158.]
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.35   | 3.42   | 2.80   | 3.07  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.24   | 4.08   | 3.57   | 6.26   | 6.63   | 9.07   | 7.61   | 7.41   | 8.94   | 4.85  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.20   | 4.68   | 3.01   | 3.92   | 9.80   | 4.23   | 2.54   | 3.12   | 3.45   | 2.75  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.00   | 3.90   | 6.53   | 2.22   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6690.

#### Yoshimoto *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2019395EN.01000601.xml

| 22.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 395/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 395/6

---

Special Report No 20/2019

‘EU information systems supporting border control — a strong tool, but more focus needed on timely and complete data’

(2019/C 395/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 20/2019 ‘EU information systems supporting border control — a strong tool, but more focus needed on timely and complete data’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
**Exhibit 12**

**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
**Six Months Ended June 30, 2002***(In thousands)*
**Earnings**Income before interest expense, net of ATC equity earnings $19,713Add: Income tax items 8,829 Income tax on other income 512 Income distribution from equity investee 1,510 AFUDC - borrowed funds 109 Interest on rentals* 456 Amortization of debt discount 207 Total earnings before interest and taxes $31,336**Fixed Charges**Interest on long-term debt $5,905Amortization of debt discount 207Other interest 209Interest on rentals* 456 Total fixed charges $6,777**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**4.62x**
#### COM. v. PHELAN, K.

1358 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/07/2017

CP-23-CR-0003469-2015

(Delaware)

Affirmed
EX-35 (i)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

March 24, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-1 Trust


Per Section 3.20(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
1/31/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities
Administrator), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:

(a)   A review of the activities of such party during the preceding calendar
      year or portion thereof and of performance of such party under this
      Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision.


(b)   To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, such party
      has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill
      any such obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure
      known to such officer and the nature and status thereof.


(c)   Notwithstanding anything herein to contrary (and noting that, to the
      extent of any inconsistency, any and all other statements, certifications
      or assertions herein are subject to the following): instances of
      noncompliance related to the subject transaction for the applicable
      reporting period are identified on Schedule A hereto.



Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary


Schedule A


Payment/Distribution Calculation Errors


During the reporting period, certain errors were made in connection with the
calculation of payments/distributions on the securities. To the best of the
signing officer's knowledge, each such error, which may or may not have been
material, has been identified and remedied and any related corrective action has
been disclosed in a report previously filed with the SEC in respect of the
reporting period.
### OF TJ3XAS AUSTIN. TEXAS 

### 78711

November 2, 1973 The Honorable Dan R. Beck County Attorney Fayette County Courthouse La Grange, Texas 78945
Dear Mr. Beck: Your request for anopinion asks: Opinion No. H- 142 Re: Whether, indeveloping land along the Colorado River, it is necessary to provide for public access at any stated interval.

Is itnecessary to grant public access to the Colorado River every two miles? Article 6703, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, provides inpart:

“The commissioners court shall order the laying out and opening ofpublic roads when necessary ~. . ” The question ofwhether any particular road is neces,sary.in the public interest is for the Commissioners Court to determine. Tarrant County v. Shannon, etux, 129Tex. 264, 104 S.W. 2d 4 (Tex. 1937). The only restriction is that the determination be reasonable. The Commissioners Court ofFayette County is not legally required to furnish access roads to the Colorado River every two miles unless it is determined to be factually necessary. SUMMARY A Commissioners Court may:grant.public access to a river every two ,miles. but there is nolegal requirement that it,do so unless itfinds the road tobe “necessary”.

Attorney General ofTexasThe Honorable Dan R. Beck, page 2 (H-142)

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 676
#### COM. v. AMY, W.

1814 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/17/2017

CP-14-CR-0000658-2015

(Centre)

Affirmed
tro1\i~^l.'j'4(NiIJ"'59•-JH-oT",Isi1^13fe-i?i,>§.^1'^"t^\^^QfCl^-DliJTsr:t^r-C:.ri13;3:t;jC54I,^^#tS"f1^41Vli'fS-Si-y4-1^3Ma?i^rslAS_^rs)CO-^SIin/NC^3o3iiS.s^I"I5.3^!o:>|U1laIQ,rsLU^LUCC^00e^*-ULi_SCEO1^opJK.wJSocc<O)JD<tl97



# o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 VENIREPERSONS: (Indicating) 

### MR. KAYE; Okay. Keep them up because I 

## am going to have to write all this down. Number 9. Put your hand down. 8.



### Anyone else on the second row? No one on the second row? 

### Third row? We have Ms. McNeill. VENIREPERSON McNEILL: Yes. MR. KAYE: How are you? VENIREPERSON McNEILL: Fine. 

### MR. KAYE: I am going to come back and ask 

# you why you feel that in a minute just because we haven't heard from you today.



### Who else on the third row agrees with the 

# indictment, means you have got to be a little bit guilty? I know I have asked you twice before, but what is your name, please? 

### VENIREPERSON DAKAN: Alana Dakan. 24.



### MR. KAYE: Got you. Okay. 24. Who else? VENIREPERSON MELONE: (Indicating) MR. KAYE: 26. Melone. 

### And back row, who agrees with that? VENIREPERSONS: (Indicating) 

### MR. KAYE: You are 29. 30. 32. Thank you very much. 

# o

Susan Cheney, CSR, RPR 391st District Court Reporter, Tom Green County, Tx142 

# o



# o

o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 

### her. Thank you very much, Ms. Taylor. VENIREPERSON TAYLOR: Thank you. THE COURT: All right. 

### Next is Number 30. Do we really need to talk to Mr. Sides?



### MR. CLAYTON: I would just as soon, I 

## think probably by agreement, we could let him go.

MR. KAYE: Which one was he? 

### MR. CLAYTON: Sides is the one that is 

## always going to believe the police officer. He knew the hot buttons to get off jury service.

MR. KAYE: Yes, that's fine with me to

excuse him. THE COURT: Okay. I am going to excuse Number 30, Gary Sides, for cause.



### Okay. Let me see where we are now. We 

## have got seven that we have struck up to 39, so that should be it. The next one was 46.

MR. KAYE: I thought it was 32. 

### THE COURT: Ms. Fly. I didn't call her

name. MR. CLAYTON: No.



### MR. KAYE: All right. I'm not sure why I 

### have a note by her. Must be my mistake. THE COURT: So that's it.

Susan Cheney, GSR, RPR 391st District Court Reporter, Tom Green County, Tx
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Annual Report of Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
Brown, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





(1)    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date: March
19, 2008





/s/
      David BrownDavid
      Brown
              Chief
      Executive Officer
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3821 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-025-AD

Helicopter Model: 

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: These proposed actions are intended to detect a crack and prevent failure of an M/R 

blade and subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

 Cleaning and performing all inspections of a set of M/R blades (2 per helicopter) would 

require a half work-hour. No parts would be needed. At an estimated 24 inspections a year, the 

cost would be $1,032 per helicopter and $53,664 for the U.S. fleet. 

 Replacing an M/R blade would require 12 work hours and parts would cost $90,656 for a 

total cost of $91,676 per blade. 

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Charles Harrison
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 30, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 30, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24A0751. ISRAEL CHARLES MINNIS v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On January 17, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors

and a brief no later than January 29, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
No. 12-5506.

#### Nasir *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism on June 
3-4, 1998.
    The meeting will be open to the public, as noted below, to discuss 
Institute programs and other issues relating to committee activities as 
indicated in the notice. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Ms. Ida Nestorio at 301-443-4376.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6) of Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Public Law 92-463 for 
the review, discussion and evaluation of individual research grant 
applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and programs, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    A summary of the meeting and the roster of committee members may be 
obtained from: Ms. Ida Nestorio, Office of Scientific Affairs, National 
Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Willco Building, Suite 409, 
6000 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20892-7003, Telephone: 301-443-
4376. Other information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from 
the contact person indicated.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism.
    Executive Secretary: James F. Vaughan, 6000 Executive Blv., 
Suite 409, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-4375.
    Dates of Meeting: June 3-4, 1998.
    Places of Meeting: (June 3) Pooks Hill Marriott Hotel, Bethesda, 
MD 20814; (June 4), Conference Room E1 & E2, Building 45 (Natcher), 
NIH Campus, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: June 3, 1998--7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Open: June 4, 1998--8:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Discussion of Institute extramural research programs, 
and other program and peer review issues relevant to Council 
activities.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol 
Research Center Grants; National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 4, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12176 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2019038EN.01000102.xml

| 31.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9056 — Generali CEE/AS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 38/02)

On 10 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9056. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9056. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exh 10.13 First Amendment to 3675 Kennesaw Bldg PSA






Exhibit 10.13




AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL SALES AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL SALES AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made as of February 3, 2012, by and between Wells Fund XIV - 3675 Kennesaw 75 Parkway, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Seller”) and  Parallax Digital Studios, Inc., a Georgia corporation (“Purchaser”).


RECITALS:


A.    Purchaser and Seller entered into that certain Commercial Sales Agreement, dated as of January 4, 2012, as modified by Addendum to Commercial Sales Agreement dated January 4, 2012 (as modified, the “Agreement”); and


B.    Purchaser has requested an extension of the Closing and Seller has agreed to grant such an extension on the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.


AMENDMENT:


For and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


1.    Closing.  Notwithstanding anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary or in conflict, Purchaser and Seller hereby agree the closing date under the Agreement shall be extended to Friday, February 24, 2012 or such earlier date as Purchaser and Seller may agree.


2.    Miscellaneous.


(a)    All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.


(b)    The Agreement and all terms, covenants and conditions thereof, as amended by this Amendment, shall remain and continue in full force and effect.


(c)    This Amendment shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Seller and Purchaser, and each of their respective successors and assigns.


(d)    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which (or any combination of which) when signed by all of the parties shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one agreement.  Executed copies hereof may be delivered by telecopier or PDF and upon receipt shall be deemed originals and binding upon the parties hereto.


    
[Signatures on following page]













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first above written.


SELLER:


WELLS FUND XIV - 3675 KENNESAW 75 PARKWAY, LLC,
a Georgia limited liability company


By:    Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., a Georgia
Limited partnership, its sole member


By:    Wells Capital, Inc., a Georgia corporation
its general partner


By: /s/ Douglas P. Williams
Name: Douglas P. Williams
Title: Senior Vice President




/s/ Douglas P. Williams
Leo F. Wells, III, its general partner, by and 
through Douglas P. Williams as attorney in fact








[Signatures continued on following page]











[Signatures continued from previous page]






PURCHASER:


PARALLAX DIGITAL STUDIOS, INC.,
a Georgia corporation




By: /s/ David E. Clevenger
Name: David E. Clevenger
Title: President