UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 10-K
 
 (Mark One)
 x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
 
 o
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
 
 Commission File No. 333-147755
 
 ICONIC BRANDS, INC.
 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)
 
 NEVADA

13-4362274(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)c/o David Lubin & Associates, PLLC

10 Union Avenue

Lynbrook, NY

11563(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)
 
 (631) 991-3174(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:Title of each class registered:
Name of each exchange on which registered:None
NoneSecurities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
  Common Stock, par value $0.00001(Title of class)
 
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.        Yes  o     No  x
 
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  o      No  x
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x No  o
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No  o
 
 Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x
 
 
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
 Large accelerated filer
o

Accelerated filer
oNon-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o

Smaller reporting company
x
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes   x   No o
 
 State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently computed second fiscal quarter.  $ 6,772,039 based upon  $ .20per share which was the last price at which the common equity purchased by non-affiliates was last sold, since there is no public bid or ask price.
 
 On April 10, 2011, the Company has 52,519,307 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
 
 Documents Incorporated by Reference : None.
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 PART IITEM 1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


1ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS


3ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES


3ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


3ITEM 4.
(REMOVED AND RESERVED)


5PART IIITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


5ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


8ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


8ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


15ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


15ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


16ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


16PART IIIITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


17ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


17ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


21ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


22ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


22PART IVITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


24SIGNATURES



26
 
 
 
  PART I
 
 ITEM 1.      BUSINESS
 
 Iconic Brands, Inc., formerly Paw Spa, Inc. (“Iconic Brands”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 21, 2005. Our initial business plan was to provide mobile grooming and spa services for cats and dogs. Our services were going to include bathing, hair cutting and styling, brushing/combing, flea and tick treatments, nail maintenance and beautification, ear cleaning, teeth cleaning, hot oil treatments, and massage. We did not have any business operations and failed to generate any revenues.  We abandoned this business, as we lacked sufficient capital resources.  On June 10, 2009, the Company acquired Harbrew Imports, Ltd. (“Harbrew New York”), a New York corporation incorporated on September 8, 1999 which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Harbrew Imports, Ltd. Corp. (“Harbrew Florida”), a Florida corporation incorporated on January 4, 2007.  On closing, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued to the designees of Harbrew New York 27,151,984 shares of our Common Stock, or approximately 64% of the 42,310,301 shares outstanding at the time of the merger.  After the merger, Harbrew New York continued as the surviving company under the laws of the state of New York and became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
 
 In anticipation of the merger between Iconic Brands, Inc. and Harbrew New York, on May 1, 2009 the Board of Directors and a majority of shareholders of Harbrew New York approved the amendment of its Articles of Incorporation changing its name to Iconic Imports, Inc. (“Iconic Imports”). On June 22, 2009, this action was filed with the New York State Department of State.
 
 Prior to the merger on June 10, 2009, Iconic Brands had no assets, liabilities, or business operations.  Accordingly, the merger has been treated for accounting purposes as a recapitalization by the accounting acquirer Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports and the financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, and operations of Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports from its inception on September 8, 1999 to June 10, 2009 and are combined with Iconic Brands thereafter.  Iconic Brands and its wholly-owned subsidiary Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports are hereafter referred to as the “Company”.
 
 The Company was a brand owner of self-developed alcoholic beverages.  Effective June 10, 2009, prior to the merger, Harbrew Florida affected a 1-for-1,000 reverse stock split of its common stock, reducing the issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 24,592,160 to 24,909, which includes a total of 317 shares resulting from the rounding of fractional shares.  All share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split.On August 20, 2010, Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, a holder of a Promissory Note with a then remaining balance of approximately $190,000, delivered a Formal Notice of Default to the Company demanding payment of the balance on or before September 1, 2010. On September 16, 2010, Capstone delivered a Notification of Disposition of Collateral to the Company notifying the Company of its attachment of the collateral (including accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, and contract rights) and its intent to sell the collateral to the highest qualified bidder in a public sale on September 28, 2010. On September 14, 2010 , the Second District Court of Suffolk County New York issued a Warrant of Eviction removing the Company from its Lindenhurst, New York office. On September 28, 2010, an auction was held at the Company’s warehouse located at 1174 Route 109 Lindenhurst NY. A bid was made by Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC in the amount of $233,075.35 representing the credit balance due on the Promissory Note by and among Harbrew Imports, Ltd. (Iconic Imports, Inc.), Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC. There were no other bids and the Auction was closed at 10.03 AM.
 
 Business Overview
 
 We are now considered a blank check company. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) defines those companies as “any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies.” Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), we also qualify as a “shell company,” because we have no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. We intend to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.
 
 Our current business plan is to attempt to identify and negotiate with a business target for the merger of that entity with and into the Company. In certain instances, a target company may wish to become a subsidiary of the Company or may wish to contribute or sell assets to the Company rather than to merge. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in identifying or negotiating with any target company. We seek to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting or public company whose securities are qualified for trading in the United States secondary markets.
 
 1
 A business combination with a target company normally will involve the transfer to the target company of the majority of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company, and the substitution by the target company of its own management and board of directors. No assurances can be given that we will be able to enter into a business combination, or, if we do enter into such a business combination, no assurances can be given as to the terms of a business combination, or as to the nature of the target company.
 
 Competition
 
 The  Company  is an  insignificant  participant  among  firms  which  engage in business  combinations  with, or financing of,  development  stage  enterprises. There are many established management and financial consulting companies and venture capital firms which have significantly greater financial and personnel resources, technical expertise and experience than the Company. In view of the Company's limited financial resources and management  availability,  the Company will  continue  to  be at a  significant  competitive  disadvantage  vis-à-vis  the Company's competitors.
 
 Regulation and Taxation
 
 The Investment Company Act of 1940 defines an "investment company" as an issuer which is or holds  itself out as being  engaged  primarily  in the  business  of investing,  reinvesting  or trading of  securities.  While the Company  does not intend to  engage in such  activities,  the  Company  could  become  subject  to regulation  under the  Investment  Company  Act of 1940 in the event the Company obtains or  continues  to hold a minority  interest  in a number of  development stage   enterprises.   The  Company  could  be  expected  to  incur  significant registration  and compliance  costs if required to register under the Investment Company  Act of 1940.  Accordingly, management will continue to  review  the Company's  activities  from  time  to  time  with a  view  toward  reducing  the likelihood the Company could be classified as an "investment company."
 
 The Company intends to structure a merger or acquisition in such manner as to minimize Federal and state tax consequences to the Company and to any target company.
 
 License Agreements
 On April 26, 2007, we entered into an exclusive License Agreement with Seven Cellos, LLC, pursuant to which we were granted a limited license to certain rights in and to Danny DeVito’s name, likeness and biography for use by us in connection with Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello. The term of the agreement continues in perpetuity unless the agreement is terminated upon prior notice. In consideration for the license, we agreed to pay royalties as follows: 5% of net profits to Behr Abrahamson & Kaller, LLP and a payment of 50% of the remaining net profits to Danny DeVito. In addition, we granted a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our Common Stock to Mr. DeVito, for an exercise price equal to the lower of $1.00 per share or 85% of the 30-day average bid and ask price prior to exercise. We also granted a warrant to Behr Abrahamson to purchase 20,000 shares of our Common Stock for an exercise price equal to the lower of $1.00 per share or 85% of the 30-day average bid and ask price prior to exercise. Danny DeVito agreed to use reasonable efforts to be available for a reasonable number of promotional appearances during each consecutive 12-month period, the duration of which will not exceed two days. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. DeVito granted us a right of first refusal for a period of five years to license any other liquor, spirit or alcoholic beverage which Danny may determine to endorse or develop. A condition precedent to Danny DeVito’s performance under the agreement is our applying for a trademark for the brand name “Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello,” with Danny DeVito being designated as a 50% co-owner of the such trademark. We applied for the trademark on April 10, 2007 (trademark application number 377/152,934), which application is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
 
 Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we entered into an Addendum to the License Agreement whereby we granted Danny DeVito the right to receive notice and provide his prior written consent for any material contract that we enter into. Failure to obtain such consent will permit Danny DeVito to terminate the License Agreement.
 
 On August 20, 2010 (see Note 11), the company and Seven Cellos LLC terminated the License Agreement relating to the distribution of an alcoholic beverage known as “Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello”. In the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, this brand accounted for approximately 96% of total sales.
 
 On January 15, 2010, we entered into an exclusive License Agreement with Tony Siragusa, pursuant to which we were granted a limited license to certain rights in and to Tony Siragusa’s name, likeness and biography for use by us in connection with Tony Siragusa’s YO Vodka.  The term of the agreement is four (4) years.  In consideration for the license, we agreed to distribute net profits of the venture as follows: 42.5 % to the company, 42.5% to the licensor, 10% to William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC and 5% to Brian Hughes.  In addition, we issued 250,000 shares of the company’s common stock, and warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $1.00, and a warrant to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $1.50.Tony Siragusa agreed to use reasonable efforts to be available for a reasonable number of promotional appearances during each consecutive 12-month period, the duration of which will not exceed six days.  A condition precedent to Tony Siragusa’s performance under the agreement is our applying for a trademark for the brand name “Yo Vodka,” with Licensor being designated as a 50% co-owner of such trademark. We applied for the trademark on March 9, 2010 (trademark application number 77747523), which application is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. As of December 31, 2010, a commercial product was not introduced and the agreement is currently in default.
 
 2
 Manufacturing Agreements
 
 In August 2007, we entered into an Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement with Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino, an Italian corporation. The term of the agreement is for five years from August 18, 2007, and it automatically renews for additional, consecutive five-year terms unless either party gives written notice at least 90 days prior to the end of the then current term. In return for Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino’s manufacture and shipping of Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello, we pay between $65 and $68 per case of 12 750-ml. bottles. This is an exclusive contract where Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino is bound to not manufacture or sell Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello to anyone other than us, and we are bound to not purchase Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello from any other manufacturer.
 
 As a result of the termination of the Seven Cellos LLC agreement, and the subsequent foreclosure by the secured lender Capstone LLC, this agreement expired.
 
 Employees
 As of December 31, 2010, we had 1 full-time employee, currently we have no employees.
 
 Consultants
 
 On January 4 2010, an advisory engagement letter was entered into between the Company and CorProminence LLC, under which CorProminence would provide services for management consulting, business advisory, shareholder information and public relations.  In return for the services contemplated, the Company issued 300,000 restricted shares of the company’s common stock
 
 On March 16, 2010, an amendment was made to the agreement with Cresta Capital Strategies LLC extending their services for 12 months. In consideration of this extension, the company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock and reduced the exercise price of their warrants from $1.50  to twenty-five ($.25) cents.
 
 ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
 
 Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item 1A.
 
 ITEM 2.     PROPERTIES
 
 The Company occupied its facilities in Freeport, New York up until March 2009 under a month to month agreement at a monthly rent of $14,350.  In March 2009, the Company moved its facilities to Lindenhurst, New York pursuant to a three year lease agreement providing for annual rentals ranging from $85,100 to $90,283.  Provided certain conditions were met, the Company had an option to renew the lease for an additional two years at annual rentals ranging from $92,991 to $95,781. On September 14, 2010, the Second District Court of Suffolk County issued a Warrant of Eviction removing the Company from its facilities.  At December 31, 2010, accounts payable includes $22,913 of unpaid rent due to the former landlord.  The Company has incurred no additional costs that would be chargeable to operations as a result of the seizure of the premises, including seized assets or out-of-pocket expenses incidental to seizure. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, rent expense was $69,639 and $99,115, respectively.
 
 ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
 The Company is party to a variety of legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of business.  We accrue for these items as losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.  While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will have, and have had a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.
 
 3
 On August 20, 2010, Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, a holder of a Promissory Note with a then remaining balance of approximately $190,000, delivered a Formal Notice of Default to the Company demanding payment of the balance on or before September 1, 2010. On September 16, 2010, Capstone delivered a Notification of Disposition of Collateral to the Company notifying the Company of its attachment of the collateral (including accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, and contract rights) and its intent to sell the collateral to the highest qualified bidder in a public sale on September 28, 2010.On September 14, 2010 , the Second District Court of Suffolk County New York issued a Warrant of Eviction removing the Company from its Lindenhurst, New York office. On September 28, 2010, an auction was held at the Company’s warehouse located at 1174 Route 109 Lindenhurst NY. A bid was made by Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC in the amount of $233,075.35 representing the credit balance due on the Promissory Note  by and among Harbrew Imports, Ltd ( Iconic Imports, Inc.,) Capstone Capital Group I,LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC. There were no other bids and the Auction was closed at 10.03 AM. The Company does not have an ability to pay the following legal actions, nor the funds available to defend the actions and therefore all the following actions will move to default status.
 
 On or about January 24, 2008, Connecticut Container Corp., a wholesale distributor of packaging materials, initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Nassau County (Docket No. 1458/08).  The plaintiff had demanded payment of an aggregate of $31,693 in connection with certain amounts allegedly owed by us.  On August 7, 2008, we settled the litigation for the full amount. We agreed to pay one-half of such amount on each of August 20, 2008 and September 20, 2008.  We paid $24,500 and due to non-payment of the remaining amount a judgment for $7,443 was issued against us by the court.
 
 On February 14, 2008, Chester Stewart, an individual, initiated a lawsuit in the State of Connecticut Superior Court (Docket No. D.N. HHD CV08-5018180S) alleging breach of a promissory note in the amount of $100,000. A judgment was entered in Connecticut, and will be defended when the action is entered in New York. .
 
 On or about July 24, 2008, Elite Marketing Concepts, a wholesale distributor of wine, initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of New York in Nassau County (Docket No. 08-009338).  The plaintiff has demanded payment in the amount of $32,270 for goods sold and delivered to us by the plaintiff.  On August 15, 2008, we reached an agreement to pay Elite $29,000 in two equal payments.  We paid the first $14,500 and due to non-payment a judgment was issued against us on June 5, 2009 in the amount of $9,679. On May 6, 2009 a payment of $4,129.12 was made bringing the balance to $2,549.88
 
 On October 23, 2008, Thermo Plastic Tech, Inc., a manufacturer of thermo plastic material, initiated litigation against us in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division, Civil Part, Union County (Docket No. UNN-L-3062-08). The plaintiff has demanded payment in the amount of $30,292 for goods sold and delivered to us by the plaintiff. The court issued a judgment against us in the amount of $30,292. A settlement agreement was reached in the amount of $12,500; final releases will be given with the last payment of $2,500 on June 1, 2010.
 
 On August 5, 2009, The Estate of Mercer K Ellington initiated litigation claiming the company used the name Duke Ellington without permission. The company has retained counsel, answered all the accusations, and has initiated a counter claim against the estate.
 
 On August 12, 2009, Christina Hsu, a former employee, initiated an action claiming the company owed wages and consulting services in the amount of $20,000. The company has retained counsel and answered all the pleadings.
 
 On October 28, 2009, Contri Spumanti S.P.A., a producer of wine, initiated litigation against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Suffolk (index # 09-43045). The plaintiff has demanded payment the amount of $37,516.14 for goods sold by the company. The Court issued a judgment in the amount of the claim. A settlement agreement was reached for the amount claimed for 8 payments of a similar amount commencing April 1, 2010.
 
 On October 29, 2009, Fred and Joseph Scalamandre Real Estate initiated litigation claiming non-payment of rent in the amount of $238,000 plus interest and fees for a specific time period. The company has recognized the total obligation on its books as of September 30, 2009, and has retained counsel to file an answer.
 
 On November 4, 2009, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation initiated litigation in the amount of $17,104.09 claiming a default on the lease of an automobile. The company has retained counsel, and has answered all the pleadings.
 
 On August 5, 2010, Coachman Luxury Transport initiated an action against Iconic Brands, Inc in the amount of $5,000 claiming non payment of monies due for rental of a bus. The company is not contesting the amount due.
 
 On July 19, 2010, Sherwood Suffolk Co initiated an action against Iconic Brands, Inc in the amount of $7,518.56 for non payment of rent for the month of July. As today, the company owes Sherwood Suffolk Co, additional rent for the month of August in the amount of $7,518.56.
 
 On September 14, 2010, Sherwood Suffolk was given a warrant of eviction by the Second District Court of Suffolk County, and Sherwood Suffolk presented the warrant to the Sheriff of Suffolk County to enforce. In addition to the warrant of eviction, the court awarded a judgment in the amount of $16,256.73 to Sherwood Suffolk Co.
 
 On September 16, 2010, Capstone Capital Group LLC notified the Company that in accordance with the Formal Notice of Default dated August 20, 2010, Capstone is exercising its right to attach and sell all the collateral referred to in the promissory note between the parties. The collateral consists of: all inventory, all equipment, machinery, fixtures, vehicles, furnishings, general intangibles, including trademarks, trade names, and anything else owned by Harbrew Imports Ltd, the predecessor name of Iconic Imports, Inc.
 
 4
 
 On September 28, 2010, an auction was held at the company’s warehouse located at 1174 Route 109 Lindenhurst NY. A bid was made by Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC in the amount of $233,075.35 representing the credit balance due on the Promissory Note (as more fully described in that certain Termination Agreement, dated June 5, 2010) by and among Harbrew Imports, Ltd ( Iconic Imports, Inc.,) Capstone Capital Group I,LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC). There were no other bids and the Auction was closed at 10.03 AM.
 
 On November 30, 2010, Abraham Ohanian initiated an action against Harbrew Imports Ltd. Corp for failure to pay a promissory note in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00). The company did not appear and  a default judgment was entered against Harbrew Imports Ltd. Corp in the amount of 115,254.00 plus costs and disbursements.
 
 On December 16, 2010, Chester Stewart, an individual, initiated a lawsuit in the State of Connecticut Superior Court (Docket No. D.N. HHD CV08-5018180S) alleging breach of a promissory note in the amount of $100,000. A judgment was entered in Connecticut, on February 18, 2008, the action was re-filed in the Supreme Court of  New York, docket # 652286/2010. .
 
 We believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will  have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operations. Apart from the legal proceedings noted in the previous paragraphs, we are not party to any legal proceedings, nor are we aware of any contemplated or pending legal proceedings against us.
 
 
 ITEM 4.   REMOVED AND RESERVED
 
 PART II
 
 ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
 Market Information
 
 We have three classes of equity securities: (i) common stock, par value $.00001 per share, 44,810,411 shares of which were outstanding as of December 31, 2010 (ii) Series A preferred stock, par value $.00001 per share of which 1 share was outstanding as of December 31, 20010, and (iii) Series B preferred stock, stated value $2.00 per share of which 916,603 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
 
 Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "ICNB.OB" since July 2009. All filings are up to date. There has been no active trading in the Company’s securities, and there has been no bid or ask prices quoted.
 
 Holders
 
 As of December 31, 2010, there were approximately 362 shareholders of record of our common stock. This does not reflect the number of persons or entities who held stock in nominee or "street" name through various brokerage firms.
 
 Holders of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock.
 
 Dividends
 
 Our board of directors has not declared a dividend on our common stock during the last two fiscal years nor do we anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we expect to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and expansion. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings levels, capital requirements, any restrictive loan covenants and other factors the Board considers relevant.
 
 Equity Compensation Plans
 
 We do not have any equity compensation plans.
 
 5
 Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
 
 The following unregistered securities were issued by the Company during the past three years:
 
 On January 15, 2008, the Company issued a total of 125 shares of common stock each to Michael H. Ferrence and Richard A. Freeman in consideration for legal services rendered, valued in the aggregate amount of $25,000. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”).Messrs. Ferrence and Freeman were the securities lawyers for our Company and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement, and the transaction did not involve a public offering.
 
 On July 14, 2008, the Company issued a total of 1,600 shares of the Company’s common stock to two accredited investors, Bentley Asset Investment Group, Inc, and New Century Capital Consultants, Inc. (the “Consultants”), pursuant to Consulting Agreements between the Company and the Consultants, valued in the amount of $160,000. Pursuant to the consulting agreements, the Consultant provided non-exclusive consulting services related to the further development of the Company’s business and other services described in Section 1 of the agreements. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On August 8, 2008, the Company issued 2,731 shares of common stock to Richard J. DeCicco, its Chief Executive Officer, in consideration of services rendered as the chief executive of the Company, valued in the amount of $273,096. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act. Mr. Decicco is an officer and a director of the Company and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement and the transaction did not involve a public offering.
 
 On August 8, 2008, the Company issued a total of 1,050 shares of common stock to The DeVito Family Trust DTD and the DeVito Children’s Trust of 1988, accredited investors, valued in the amount of $105,000. The shares were issued pursuant to the License Agreement between the Company and Seven Cellos by which the Company obtained a limited license for the use of Danny Devito’s name and likeness and his endorsement in connection with the manufacture, distribution and promotion of the Danny Devito Premium Limoncello. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On August 11, 2008, the Company issued 2,000 shares of the its common stock to an accredited investor, MLF Group, LLC, a consulting firm pursuant the Financial Consulting Agreement dated July 31, 2008 between MLF Group LLC and the Company, valued in the amount of $200,000. Pursuant the agreement MLF performed services as a financial consultant and provided the Company with an analysis of its business and industry and other services as discussed in Section III of the agreement.  These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, On June 10, 2009, the Company issued 27,352,301 shares of common stock to the designees of Harbrew New York.  Of this amount:
 
 1)
24,909 shares were issued to Harbrew Florida stockholders. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act. The investors were stockholders of Harbrew Florida and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement and the transaction did not involve a public offering.
 
 2)
19,634,112 shares of common stock were issued to Company management and personnel for services rendered, including 15,972,359 shares to the Richard J. DeCicco, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 100,000 shares to the William Blacker the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and 2,586,753 shares to Donald Chadwell. The estimated value of the services rendered is $1,963,411 and 850,000 shares to eight employees, and 125,000 shares to a law firm. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act; the recipients are affiliates of the Company and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement and the transaction did not involve a public offering.
 
 3)
2,086,973 shares of common stock valued at $208,697 were issued to Danny DeVito and affiliates, accredited investors, for consulting services performed in connection with the License Agreement between the Company and Seven Cellos by which the Company obtained a limited license for the use of Danny Devito’s name and likeness and his endorsement in connection with the manufacture, distribution and promotion of the Danny Devito Premium Limoncello. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act;
 
 4)
4,606,307 shares of common stock were issued to noteholders who are accredited investors in satisfaction of $2,125,625 of debt and $177,529 of accrued interest. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act; and
 
 5)
1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Capstone, an accredited investor, as part of the Termination Agreement dated June 5, 2009, between the Harbrew Imports Ltd and Capstone Business Credit LLC and Capstone Capital Group, LLC. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 6
 Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 1 share of Series A Preferred Stock valued at $100,000 to Richard J. DeCicco, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for services rendered, valued in the amount of $100,000.  The 1 share of Series A Preferred Stock entitles the holder to two (2) votes for every share of Common Stock deemed outstanding and has no conversion or dividend rights.  These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act. Mr. Decicco is an officer and a director of the Company and had access to all of the information which would be required to be included in a registration statement and the transaction did not involve a public offering
 
 Pursuant to the terms of the Termination Agreement dated June 5, 2009, between the Harbrew Imports Ltd. and Capstone Business Credit LLC and Capstone Capital Group, LLC, the Company issued 916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock valued at $1,833,206 to Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, an accredited investor. Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 per share, has no voting rights, and is convertible into one share of Common Stock at the lower of (1) $2.00 per share or, (2) the volume weighted average price per share for the 20 trading days immediately prior to the conversion date.These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 In the three months ended September 30, 2009, a total of $122,500 of debt and $28,147 of accrued interest was converted into a total of 300,110 shares of Company common stock. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On August 19, 2009, we completed a private placement offering in the aggregate amount of $500,000 from an accredited investor through the sale of (a) 1,000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001, with a per share purchase price of $0.50 per share; (b) a Class I Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase an aggregate of 100% of the number of shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, exercisable for a period of five years; and (c) a Class J Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase an aggregate of 100% of the number of shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share, exercisable for a period of five years. Proceed from the sale of the securities were used for working capital purposes. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On October 6, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to Brady Middleditch, an accredited investor, pursuant to a one month Consulting Agreement for general management and consulting services, including advising the Company on corporate structure, marketing and developing strategic alliance. Such services were valued in the amount of $200,000. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On January 6 and 13, 2010, the Company issued a total of 200,000 shares of common stock, 100,000 five year warrants exercisable at $0.22 per share, and 100,000 five year warrants exercisable at $0.23 per share, along with two promissory notes in the amount of $110,000 each (one due March 31, 2010 and one due May 31, 2010), to Marvin Mermelstein, an accredited investor, in exchange for a $200,000 loan.  The fair value of the common stock ($45,000) and warrants ($33,930), along with the $20,000 discount, were recorded as debt discounts, which are being amortized over the terms of the notes as interest expense.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rates of 2.6% and 2.55%, volatility of 100%, and terms of five years. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On January 15 and 25, 2010 the Company issued 152,546 shares of common stock, and 250,000 warrants to three accredited investors pursuant to convertible promissory notes, in the aggregate amount of $62,500 plus accrued interest of $13,773. The notes were converted at the rate of $0.50 per share and the warrants were exercised at the price of $$1.00 and $1.50. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 Pursuant to the Exclusive License Agreement dated January 15, 2010, between the Company and Tony Siragusa, the Company was granted a limited license to certain rights in and to Tony Siragusa’s name, likeness and biography for use by the Company in connection with Tony Siragusa’s YO Vodka. In consideration for such uses, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock, warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.50 to Tony Siragusa, an accredited investor. We did not generate any proceeds from the issuance of the securities.  The shares were issued under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On February 24, 2010, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock to CorProminence LLC, an accredited investor, in consideration for management consulting, business advisory, shareholder information and public relation services rendered pursuant to the Consulting Agreement dated January 4, 2010. The $69,000 fair value of the common stock at date of issuance was expensed in full in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and included in professional fees. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On March 16, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Cresta Capital Strategies LLC, an accredited investor in consideration for services rendered pursuant to a one year extension of the Consulting Agreement dated March 16, 2010. The fair value of the common stock ($350,000) and warrants ($246,000) at date of issuance was capitalized as a prepaid expense (see note 4) and is being amortized over the one year term as professional fees. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 2.37%, volatility of 100%, and term of five years. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 7
 On April 19, 2010, the Company satisfied debt totaling $455,635 through its commitment to issue to the respective 5 creditors a total of 4,556,350 shares of its common stock and 4,556,350 three year warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company expects to issue these shares and warrants once it pays its liability to its transfer agent. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 On April 19, 2010, the Company agreed to issue to a noteholder 250,000 shares of its common stock in consideration of the noteholder’s extension of the due date (from March 31, 2010 to May 31, 2010) of  $110,000 promissory note. The $21,400 fair value of the common stock at date of commitment was expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and included interest expense. The Company expects to issue these shares once it pays its liability to its transfer agent. These securities were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Act.
 
 At December 31, 2010, the Company had 52,519,307 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
 
 Debt
 
 On January 4 and 13, 2010, the company issued 2 promissory notes to an investor in the amount of $110,000 each. The notes bear interest of 13% per annum and were payable on March 31, 2010 and May 31, 2010 respectively.
 
 
 ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
 Not Applicable.
 
 ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND PLAN OF OPERATIONS.
 
 The following discussion is an overview of the important factors that management focuses on in evaluating our business, financial condition and operating performance and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in this Annual Report.  This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward looking statements as a result of any number of factors.
 
 Our Business
 
 Prior to the consummation of the Merger Agreement, Harbrew New York was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Harbrew Florida.  Harbrew Florida was incorporated in the state of Florida on January 4, 2007, under the former name Stassi Harbrew Imports Corp., pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court Approved Reorganization Plan for the Stassi Interaxx, Inc. (“Stassi”) reorganization confirmed on December 20, 2006. On May 17, 2007, Harbrew Florida acquired Harbrew New York, a New York corporation incorporated on September 8, 1999 engaged in importing and wholesaling spirits, wine and beer.  As a result, Harbrew New York became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Harbrew Florida.
 
 On June 10, 2009, Merger Sub, Harbrew Florida, Harbrew New York and we entered into a Merger Agreement which resulted in Harbrew New York becoming our wholly owned subsidiary (the “Merger”).  The Merger was accomplished by means of a Merger Agreement in which Harbrew New York merged with and into Merger Sub and each share of Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’ common stock.  Under the terms of the Merger Agreement and as a result of the Merger:
 
 ·
Harbrew New York became our wholly owned subsidiary; and
 
 ·
In exchange for all of the shares of Harbrew common stock, each share of Harbrew’s common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Merger was converted into one share of Iconic Brands’ common stock.
 
 This transaction closed on June 10, 2009.
 
 Prior to the merger on June 10, 2009, we had no assets, liabilities, or business operations.  Accordingly, the merger has been treated for accounting purposes as a recapitalization by the accounting acquirer, Harbrew New York, and the financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, and operations of Harbrew New York from its inception on September 8, 1999 to June 10, 2009 and us thereafter.  References to our company are with respect to Harbrew New York to June 10, 2009 and us thereafter.
 
 8
 On September 14, 2010, Sherwood Suffolk was given a warrant of eviction by the Second District Court of Suffolk County, and Sherwood Suffolk presented the warrant to the Sheriff of Suffolk County to enforce. In addition to the warrant of eviction, the court awarded a judgment in the amount of $16,256.73 to Sherwood Suffolk Co.
 
 On September 16, 2010, Capstone Capital Group LLC notified the Company that in accordance with the Formal Notice of Default dated August 20, 2010, Capstone is exercising its right to attach and sell all the collateral referred to in the promissory note between the parties. The collateral consists of: all inventory, all equipment, machinery, fixtures, vehicles, furnishings, general intangibles, including trademarks, trade names, and anything else owned by Harbrew Imports Ltd, the predecessor name of Iconic Imports, Inc.
 
 On September 28, 2010, an auction was held at the company’s warehouse located at 1174 Route 109 Lindenhurst NY. A bid was made by Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC in the amount of $233,075.35 representing the credit balance due on the Promissory Note (as more fully described in that certain Termination Agreement, dated June 5, 2010) by and among Harbrew Imports, Ltd ( Iconic Imports, Inc.,) Capstone Capital Group I,LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC). There were no other bids and the Auction was closed at 10.03 AM.
 
 The Company plans to improve its financial condition by reorganizing.    However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing these objectives.
 
 We were in the business of importing and wholesaling spirits, wine and beer to distributors in the United States on a national basis and to retail licensees both on and off premise in New York, through our wholesale license.  We were federally licensed, maintaining licenses to both import and sell to wholesale licensed distributors in 51 markets in the United States.  In addition to the federal import and wholesale licenses, we maintained a federal customs bonded facility license at our former premises in Lindenhurst, New York.  Within the licensing category, we also maintained a New York State wholesale license and a New York State warehousing license, that permitted us to warehouse products of other companies.
 
 Plan of Operations
 
 Certain statements contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of Iconic Brands, Inc. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.
 
 Plan of Operation - General
 
 During the next 12 months, the Company intends to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire an interest in one or more business opportunities presented to it by persons or firms who or which desire to seek the perceived advantages of a publicly held corporation. At this time, the Company has no plan, proposal, agreement, understanding or arrangement to acquire or merge with any specific business or company, and the Company has not identified any specific business or company for investigation and evaluation. No member of Management or promoter of the Company has had any material discussions with any other company with respect to any acquisition of that company.
 
 The Company will not restrict its search to any specific business, industry or geographical location, and the Company may participate in a business venture of virtually any kind or nature. The discussion of the proposed plan of operation under this caption and throughout this Annual Report is purposefully general and is not meant to be restrictive of the Company's virtually unlimited discretion to search for and enter into potential business opportunities.
 
 The Company will have to obtain funds in one or more private placements to finance the operation of any acquired business. Persons purchasing securities in these placements and other shareholders will likely not have the opportunity to participate in the decision relating to any acquisition. The Company's proposed business is sometimes referred to as a "blind pool" because any investors will entrust their investment monies to the Company's management before they have a chance to analyze any ultimate use to which their money may be put. Consequently, the Company's potential success is heavily dependent on the Company's management, which will have virtually unlimited discretion in searching for and entering into a business opportunity. None of the officers and directors of the Company has had any experience in the proposed business of the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any funds in private placements. In any private placement, management may purchase shares on the same terms as offered in the private placement.
 
 9
 Management anticipates that it will only participate in one potential business venture. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in the Company because it will not permit the Company to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another. The Company may seek a business opportunity with a firm which only recently commenced operations, or a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, or seeking to develop a new product or service, or an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in the need for additional capital which is perceived to be easier to raise by a public company. In some instances, a business opportunity may involve the acquisition or merger with a corporation which does not need substantial additional cash but which desires to establish a public trading market for its common stock. The Company may purchase assets and establish wholly owned subsidiaries in various business or purchase existing businesses as subsidiaries.
 
 The Company anticipates that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries, and shortages of available capital, management believes that there are numerous firms seeking the benefits of a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of a publicly traded corporation may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for the principals of a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, providing liquidity (subject to restrictions of applicable statutes) for all shareholders, and other factors. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.
 
 As part of any transaction, the acquired company may require that management or other stockholders of the Company sell all or a portion of their shares to the acquired company, or to the principals of the acquired company. It is anticipated that the sales price of such shares will be lower than the current market price or anticipated market price of the Company's Common Stock. The Company's funds are not expected to be used for purposes of any stock purchase from insiders. The Company shareholders will not be provided the opportunity to approve or consent to such sale. The opportunity to sell all or a portion of their shares in connection with an acquisition may influence management's decision to enter into a specific transaction. However, management believes that since the anticipated sales price will be less than market value, that the potential of a stock sale by management will be a material factor on their decision to enter a specific transaction.
 
 The above description of potential sales of management stock is not based upon any corporate bylaw, shareholder or board resolution, or contract or agreement. No other payments of cash or property are expected to be received by Management in connection with any acquisition.
 
 The Company has not formulated any policy regarding the use of consultants or outside advisors, but does not anticipate that it will use the services of such persons.
 
 The Company has, and will continue to have, insufficient capital with which to provide the owners of business opportunities with any significant cash or other assets. However, management believes the Company will offer owners of business opportunities the opportunity to acquire a controlling ownership interest in a public company at substantially less cost than is required to conduct an initial public offering. The owners of the business opportunities will, however, incur significant post-merger or acquisition registration costs in the event they wish to register a portion of their shares for subsequent sale. The Company will also incur significant legal and accounting costs in connection with the acquisition of a business opportunity including the costs of preparing post-effective amendments, Forms 8-K, agreements and related reports and documents nevertheless, the officers and directors of the Company have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data which would support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity.
 
 The Company does not intend to make any loans to any prospective merger or acquisition candidates or to unaffiliated third parties.
 
 Sources of Opportunities
 
 The Company anticipates that business opportunities for possible acquisition will be referred by various sources, including its officers and directors, professional advisers, securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals.
 
 The Company will seek a potential business opportunity from all known sources, but will rely principally on personal contacts of its officers and directors as well as indirect associations between them and other business and professional people. It is not presently anticipated that the Company will engage professional firms specializing in business acquisitions or reorganizations.
 
 The officers and directors of the Company are currently employed in other positions and will devote only a portion of their time (not more than three hour per week) to the business affairs of the Company, until such time as an acquisition has been determined to be highly favorable, at which time they expect to spend full time in investigating and closing any acquisition for a period of two weeks. In addition, in the face of competing demands for their time, the officers and directors may grant priority to their full-time positions rather than to the Company.
 
 10
 Evaluation of Opportunities
 
 The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the officers and directors of the Company. Management intends to concentrate on identifying prospective business opportunities which may be brought to its attention through present associations with management. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, management will consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operation, if any; prospects for the future; present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which then may be anticipated to impact the proposed activities of the Company; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. Officers and directors of the Company will meet personally with management and key personnel of the firm sponsoring the business opportunity as part of their investigation. To the extent possible, the Company intends to utilize written reports and personal investigation to evaluate the above factors. The Company will not acquire or merge with any company for which audited financial statements cannot be obtained.
 
 It may be anticipated that any opportunity in which the Company participates will present certain risks. Many of these risks cannot be adequately identified prior to selection of the specific opportunity, and the Company's shareholders must, therefore, depend on the ability of management to identify and evaluate such risk. In the case of some of the opportunities available to the Company, it may be anticipated that the promoters thereof have been unable to develop a going concern or that such business is in its development stage in that it has not generated significant revenues from its principal business activities prior to the Company's anticipation. There is a risk, even after the Company's participation in the activity and the related expenditure of the Company's funds, that the combined enterprises will still be unable to become a going concern or advance beyond the development stage. Many of the opportunities may involve new and untested products, processes, or market strategies which may not succeed. Such risks will be assumed by the Company and, therefore, its shareholders.
 
 The Company will not restrict its search for any specific kind of business, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its corporate life. It is currently impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, in that such business may need additional capital, may merely desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.
 
 Acquisition of Opportunities
 
 In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, franchise or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. It may also purchase stock or assets of an existing business.  On the consummation of a transaction, it is possible that the present management and shareholders of the Company will not be in control of the Company. In addition, a majority or all of the  Company's  officers  and  directors  may,  as  part  of  the  terms  of the  acquisition transaction,  resign and be replaced by new officers and  directors without a vote of the Company's shareholders.
 
 It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance on exemptions from registration under applicable Federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of this transaction, the Company may agree to register such securities either at the time the transaction is consummated, under certain conditions, or at specified time thereafter. The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company's Common Stock may have a depressive effect on such market. While the actual terms of a transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to the business transaction will find it desirable to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a so called "tax free" reorganization under Sections 368(a)(1) or 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In order to obtain tax free treatment under the Code, it may be necessary for the owners of the acquired business to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such event, the shareholders of the Company, including investors in this offering, would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity, which could result in significant dilution in the equity of such shareholders.
 
 As part of the Company's investigation, officers and directors of the Company will meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company's limited financial resources and management expertise.
 
 The manner in which each Company participates in an opportunity will depend on the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and other parties, the management of the opportunity, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such other management.
 
 11
 With respect to any mergers or acquisitions, negotiations with target company management will be expected to focus on the percentage of the Company which target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company's assets and liabilities, the Company's shareholders will in all likelihood hold a lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event the Company acquires a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company's then shareholders, including purchasers in this offering.
 
 The Company will not have sufficient funds (unless it is able to raise funds in a private placement) to undertake any significant development, marketing and manufacturing of any products which may be acquired.
 
 Accordingly, following the acquisition of any such product, the Company will, in all likelihood, be required to either seek debt or equity financing or obtain funding from third parties, in exchange for which the Company would probably be required to give up a substantial portion of its interest in any acquired product. There is no assurance that the Company will be able either to obtain additional financing or interest third parties in providing funding for the further development, marketing and manufacturing of any products acquired.
 
 It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity the costs therefore incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable.
 
 Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in a loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.
 
 Management believes that the Company may be able to benefit from the use of "leverage" in the acquisition of a business opportunity. Leveraging a transaction involves the acquisition of a business through incurring significant indebtedness for a large percentage of the purchase price for that business.
 
 Through a leveraged transaction, the Company would be required to use less of its available funds for acquiring the business opportunity and, therefore, could commit those funds to the operations of the business opportunity, to acquisition of other business opportunities or to other activities. The borrowing involved in a leveraged transaction would ordinarily be secured by the assets of the business opportunity to be acquired. If the business opportunity acquired is not able to generate sufficient revenues to make payments on the debt incurred by the Company to acquire that business opportunity, the lender would be able to exercise the remedies provided by law or by contract. These leveraging techniques, while reducing the amount of funds that the Company must commit to acquiring a business opportunity, may correspondingly increase the risk of loss to the Company. No assurance can be given as to the terms or the availability of financing for any acquisition by the Company. During periods when interest rates are relatively high, the benefits of leveraging are not as great as during periods of lower interest rates because the investment in the business opportunity held on a leveraged basis will only be profitable if it generates sufficient revenues to cover the related debt and other costs of the financing. Lenders from which the Company may obtain funds for purposes of a leveraged buy-out may impose restrictions on the future borrowing, distribution, and operating policies of the Company. It is not possible at this time to predict the restrictions, if any, which lenders may impose or the impact thereof on the Company.
 
 Results of Operations
 
 Years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
 
 The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, in dollars, and key components of our revenue for the period indicated, in dollars. The discussion following the table is based on these results.
 Sales:
 
 Sales decreased by $402,242 or 52% from $773,555 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 to $ 371,313 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010.  The decrease in sales for the twelve months reflects the company’s inability to raise capital and to promote and support its brands. Due to limited available capital the Company shifted its focus and resources from marketing, promoting and distributing the products of other manufacturers to marketing, promoting and distributing its celebrity branded products, such as the Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello, Glen Master Scotch, George Vesselle Champaign and its other organically developed brands. As of September 28, 2010, the company’s assets were sold at auction and all product sales were discontinued.
 
 Cost of goods sold:
 
 Cost of goods sold decreased by $377,750, or 61.5%, from $613,494 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 to $235,744 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010. This decrease in COGS is consistent with the decrease in sales for the period as the Company could not raise sufficient funds to support its business.
 
 12
 Gross profit:
 
 Gross profit decreased by approximately $24,492 or 15 %, from $ 160,061 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009 to $135,569 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 mainly due a decrease in sales and cost of goods sold as the Company refocused its resources to its celebrity and organically developed brands.
 
 Selling, general and administrative expenses:
 
 Selling general and administrative expenses for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1,673,927 and $4,509,088 respectively, a decrease of $2,835,172 or 62.8 %. These expenses include selling, marketing and promotion expenses in the amount of $379,250, which reflects an increase of $47,944 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $331,306  for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009; administration, compensation and benefits decreased to $437,386 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 from $860,275 for the same period ended December 31, 2009; professional fees decreased to $632,877 from $692,062 as a result of decreased legal fees; occupancy and warehousing decreased to $95,101 from $155,793 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 from the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009; travel and entertainment decreased to $62,891 from $115,787 as a result of a reduction in the travel schedule; office expenses decreased to $18,452 from $36,678 as a result of better efficiencies; license and permit expense increased to $31,878 during the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 from $ 4,315 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2009 due to the Company’s continuing focus on developing and licensing its organically branded products; and other expenses also decreased to $16,092 from$40,761.The majority of the decrease reflects the expense of stock-based compensation paid in the year 2009 of $2,272,108.
 
 Income (loss) from Operations:
 
 Loss from operations was $1,538,358 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010 and $4,349,027 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in the loss from operations for the period results from the decrease in sales, offset by the decrease in expenses, principally the costs associated with the stock based compensation expense, as previously described.
 
 Interest Expense:
 
 Interest expense for the twelve month period ended December, 2010 and 2009 was $333,962 and $656,818, respectively, a decrease of $ 322,856, or 49.1 %. The decrease in interest expense for the period was a result of a rate reset by our largest creditor, and the conversion of convertible debt, and notes to equity.
 
 Loss incurred on write-off of assets seized on defaulted promissory note:
 
 On August 20, 2010, the secured lender served the company with a formal notice of default, with a deadline of September 1, 2010 to pay in full all amounts outstanding on the promissory note originally referred to in the Termination Agreement dated June 5, 2009. As a result of the company not being able to satisfy the demand, Capstone Capital Group I LLC, on September 16, 2010 served the company with a Notification of Disposition of Collateral. On September 28, 2010, an auction was held at the company’s warehouse located at 1174 Route 109 Lindenhurst NY. A bid was made by Capstone Capital Group I, LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC in the amount of $233,075.35 representing the credit balance due on the Promissory Note (as more fully described in that certain Termination Agreement, dated June 5, 2010) by and among Harbrew Imports, Ltd (Iconic Imports, Inc.,) Capstone Capital Group I,LLC and Capstone Business Credit, LLC). There were no other bids and the Auction was closed at 10.03 AM.
 
 Accordingly the book value of all the collateral referred to in the Termination Agreement of June 5, 2009 between Iconic Imports, Inc, the wholly owned subsidiary of Iconic Brands, Inc. have been written off against the debt of Capstone Capital Group I LLC, giving rise to the charge for the period of $633,921 (Note 3).
 
 Net Income (loss):
 
 Net loss was $ 2,506,241 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2010, compared to $4,907,434 for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $ 2,401,193 or 48.9 %. The decrease in the net loss for the period was a result of the culmination of all the reasons previously described
 
 Liquidity And Capital Resources
 
 Our primary uses of cash have been for selling and marketing expenses, employee compensation, new product development and working capital. The main sources of cash have been from the financing of purchase orders and the factoring of accounts receivable. In addition, we issued convertible notes and promissory notes to bridge the gap between our primary lender and our working capital requirements. All funds received were expended in the furtherance of growing the business and establishing the brand portfolios.
 
 13
 The focus of Iconic’s efforts is to acquire or develop an operating business.  Despite no active operations at this time, management intends to continue in business and has no intention to liquidate the Company.  Iconic has considered various business alternatives including the possible acquisition of an existing business, but to date has found possible opportunities unsuitable or excessively priced. Iconic does not contemplate limiting the scope of its search to any particular industry. Management has considered the risk of possible opportunities as well as their potential rewards.  Management has invested time evaluating several proposals for possible acquisition or combination; however, none of these opportunities were pursued.  Iconic presently owns no real property and at this time has no intention of acquiring any such property.  Iconic’s significant expected expenses are comprised primarily of professional fees incident to its reporting requirements.
 
 The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming Iconic will continue as a going concern.  Iconic’s recurring losses from operations, stockholders' deficiency and working capital deficiency, and lack of revenue generating operations, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
 
 Management believes Iconic will continue to incur losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the foreseeable future and will need additional equity or debt financing to sustain its operations until it can achieve profitability and positive cash flows, if ever. Management plans to seek additional debt and/or equity financing for Iconic, but cannot assure that such financing will be available on acceptable terms.
 
 The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  There can be no assurance that management will be successful in implementing its business plan or that the successful implementation of such business plan will actually improve the Company’s operating results.
 
 Going Concern Consideration
  The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a “going concern” basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Iconic Imports had its assets taken by the secured lender Capstone Capital Group I, LLC in satisfaction of their promissory note which had been defaulted on by Iconic Imports, Inc., leaving negative working capital of $3,603,957 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,080,628.  Further, from inception to December 31, 2010, the Company incurred losses of $15,891,810.  These factors create substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company plans to improve its financial condition by reorganizing and acquiring a new business.  However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing this objective.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 There are no off-balance sheet arrangements between us and any other entity that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.
 
 Critical Accounting Policies
 
 The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
 A summary of significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide useful and reliable financial information about our Company's operating results and financial condition.
 
 Code of Ethics
 
 We currently do not have a code of ethics that applies to our officers, employees and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives, however, we intend to adopt one in the near future.
 
 14
 Conflicts of Interest
 
 Certain potential conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships between our officers and directors, and us.
 
 From time to time, one or more of our affiliates may form or hold an ownership interest in and/or manage other businesses both related and unrelated to the type of business that we own and operate.  These persons expect to continue to form, hold an ownership interest in and/or manage additional other businesses which may compete with ours with respect to operations, including financing and marketing, management time and services and potential customers.  These activities may give rise to conflicts between or among the interests of us and other businesses with which our affiliates are associated.  Our affiliates are in no way prohibited from undertaking such activities, and neither we nor our shareholders will have any right to require participation in such other activities.
 
 Further, because we intend to transact business with some of our officers, directors and affiliates, as well as with firms in which some of our officers, directors or affiliates have a material interest, potential conflicts may arise between the respective interests of us and these related persons or entities.  We believe that such transactions will be effected on terms at least as favorable to us as those available from unrelated third parties.
 
 With respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we have adopted policies and procedures which require that: (i) the fact of the relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or known to the directors who authorize or approve the transaction prior to such authorization or approval, (ii) the transaction be approved by a majority of our disinterested outside directors, and (iii) the transaction be fair and reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our directors.
 
 ITEM 7A.    QUANTITIATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOUSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
 Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.
 ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
 
 ICONIC BRANDS, INC.
 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 
 CONTENTS
 
 PAGE
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDEDNT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMPAGE
F-2
BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009PAGE
F-3
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 21, 2005 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010PAGE
F-4
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 21, 2005 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2010PAGE
F-5
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM OCTOBER 21, 2005 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2009PAGES
F-6 - F-22
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 15
  ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 
 None.
 
 ITEM 9A(T).    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
 Evaluations of Disclosure Controls
 
 Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. We believe our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
 
 Management’s Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
 Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive, principal operating and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
 The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
 Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
 The Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the framework in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, commonly referred to as the “COSO” criteria. Based on the assessment performed, management believes that as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon the COSO criteria. Additionally, based on management’s assessment, the Company determined that there were no material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
 
 This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.
 
 Changes in Internal Controls
 
 During the year ended December 31, 2010, there was no change in internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that its disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
 
 Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management’s override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Individual persons perform multiple tasks which normally would be allocated to separate persons and therefore extra diligence must be exercised during the period these tasks are combined. Management is aware of the risks associated with the lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the small number of employees currently dealing with general administrative and financial matters. Although management will periodically reevaluate this situation, at this point it considers the risks associated with such lack of segregation of duties and that the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties do not justify the substantial expense associated with such increases. It is also recognized the Company has not designated an audit committee and no member of the board of directors has been designated or qualifies as a financial expert. The Company will address these concerns at the earliest possible opportunity.
 16
 PART III
 
 ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
 
 The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers and directors. Executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors.  Each executive officer holds his office until he resigns, is removed by the Board, or his successor is elected and qualified.  Directors are elected annually by our stockholders at the annual meeting.  Each director holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.
 
 NAME

AGE

POSITIONRichard J. DeCicco


52

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 Richard J. DeCicco, Mr. DeCicco has served as president, secretary and a director of Iconic Brands, Inc. since 2007.  Mr. DeCicco also served as president of Harbrew Imports Ltd. since its inception in 1999.  With over 34 years experience in the global liquor industry, Mr. DeCicco has been a senior executive and a leader in the wine and spirits industry.  Prior to his appointment at Harbrew Imports Ltd, Mr. DeCicco was the CEO and President of Harbor Industries from 1990 to 1997. Harbor Industries is a production facility, which handles over 2 million cases of products per year and with over 600 employees.  In addition to having been the national provider for The Paddington Corporation brands from 1990 to 1997, Mr. DeCicco pioneered what is now known within the field as Value Added Packaging (VAP).  Mr. DeCicco brings a great deal of creativity, market savvy, and brand development knowledge to our company.
 
 Family Relationships


There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers.
 
 Auditors; Code of Ethics; Financial Expert
 
 We do not have an audit committee financial expert.  We do not have an audit committee financial expert because we believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive.  Furthermore, because we are only beginning our commercial operations, at the present time, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.
 
 Potential Conflicts of Interest
 
 We are not aware of any current or potential conflicts of interest with any of our executives or directors.
 
 Stock Option Plan
 
 We do not maintain any equity incentive or stock option plan.  Accordingly, we did not grant options to purchase any equity interests to any employees or officers, and no stock options are issued or outstanding to any officers.  We do, however, anticipate adopting a non-qualified stock option plan where we will be granting our officers options to purchase shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements.  But, no such plan has been finalized or adopted.
 
 17
 ITEM 11.     EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 
 Summary Compensation
 
 Richard J. DeCicco
 
 Richard DeCicco has been serving as our President, Chief Executive Officer and a director since January 1, 2008.  The terms of his compensation are set forth in his Employment agreement, dated January 23, 2008 (“DeCicco Employment Agreement”).  DeCicco Employment Agreement, provides for a term of 5 years, commencing on January 1, 2008, which can be extended by a written agreement of the parties.  The agreement provides for annual compensation ranging from $265,000 to $350,000.  In addition, if the Company enters into an agreement and further sells any brand in the Company’s portfolio, Mr. DeCicco will receive 5% of such sale.  Mr. DeCicco is also entitled to incentive bonus compensation, stock and/or options in accordance with Company policies established by the Board of Directors.  The agreement provides for the grant of a non-qualified ten year option to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price which shall represent a discount to the market price. Mr. DeCicco has the right to terminate the agreement upon 60 days notice to the Company for any reason.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, if Mr. DeCicco is absent from work because of illness or incapacity cumulatively for more than 2 months in addition to vacation time in any calendar year, the Company may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice.  The agreement also provides that the agreement may be terminated upon 90 days notice to Mr. DeCicco if: (A) there is a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets to a single purchaser or group of associated purchasers; (B) there is a sale, exchange or disposition of 50% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s outstanding stock; (C) the Company terminates its business or liquidates its assets; or (D) there is a merger or consolidation of the Company in which the Company’s shareholders receive less than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of the new or continuing corporation. Mr. DeCicco shall be entitled to severance pay in the amount of 2 years compensation and medical and other benefits in the event of a termination of the agreement under certain circumstances
 
 As of fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, no payments were made to Mr. DeCicco on his 2010 and 2009 salary. However 400,000 stock options vested in his favor as of December 2010 (200,000 stock options which were scheduled to be vested on December 31, 2010 were not vested due to the Company's current financial position).The vested stock options shall be exercisable until June 30, 2018 at the exercise price of $.10 per share.
 
 As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid Mr. DeCicco $24,300 of his annual salary of $265,000. The remaining balance is still outstanding. As of December 31, 2008, 200,000 stock options vested in Mr. DeCicco’s favor. The vested stock options shall be exercisable until June 30, 2018 at the exercise price of $.10 per share.
 
 On August 8, 2008, the Company issued 2,731 shares of common stock to Mr. DeCicco in consideration for services rendered valued in the amount of $273,096, the estimated fair market value of the shares.
 
 As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, The Company paid Mr. DeCicco $88,600 of his annual salary of $265,000. The remaining balance of is still outstanding. He received no other compensation during such fiscal year.
 
 Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 15,972,356 shares of common stock to Mr. DeCicco valued at $.10 per share. The shares had an estimated fair value of $1,597,236 on the date of the grant.
 
 William D. Blacker
 
 William D. Blacker served as our Chief Financial Officer and a director since October 1, 2007.  The terms of his compensation are set forth in his Employment agreement, dated On October 1, 2007 (“Blacker Agreement”), The Blacker Agreement provides for a term of 3 years, commencing on October 1, 2007, which can be extended by a written agreement of the parties.  The Company agreed to issue options to purchase shares of its common stock to Mr. Blacker if and when the common stock becomes publicly traded, as follows: (A) upon execution of the agreement, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.05 per share; (B) on October 1, 2008, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and (C) on October 1, 2009, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $.75 per share.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Blacker is to receive an annual salary of $150,000.  Mr. Blacker has the right to terminate the agreement upon 60 days notice to the Company for any reason.  The agreement further provides that if the agreement is terminated for any reason other than willful malfeasance by Mr. Blacker, Mr. Blacker shall be entitled to receive severance pay in the amount of 6 months or the balance of the agreement’s term of existence, whichever is greater, and shall receive all benefits under the agreement. Mr. Blacker resigned September 15, 2010
 
 Pursuant to Blacker Employment Agreement, Mr. Blacker was entitled to a salary $173,643 in 2010 but no payments was made to Mr. Blacker as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. During  the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Mr. Blacker was entitled to an annual salary of $173, 643 but no payments were made as of the end of said fiscal year. As of said period 100,000 stock options were vested in his favor. The exercise price of the stock options at December 31, 2009 was $0.15 per share and the stock. The vested stock options shall be exercisable until April 1, 2011.
 
 As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, Mr. Blacker’s salary was $165,375 of which he was paid a total $25,962. As of the date hereof, the remaining balance is owed by the Company to Mr. Blacker. As of said period 100,000 stock options were vested in his favor. The exercise price of the stock options at December 31, 2008 was $0.05 per share and the vested stock options are exercisable until April 1, 2011.
 
 As of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, Mr. Blacker’s salary was $150,000 of which he was paid a pro-rated amount of $25,962. He received no other compensation during such fiscal year.
 
 Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Blacker valued at $.10 per share. The shares have an estimated fair value of $10,000 on the date of the grant.
 
 18
 
 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
 
 The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation paid by us to our officers and directors during the three most recent fiscal years. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any.
 
 Non-


NonqualifiedName















Equity


Deferred


Alland









Stock


Option


Incentive


Compensation


OtherPrincipal



Salary


Bonus


Awards


Awards


Plan


Earnings


Compensation

TotalPosition

Year

(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)


(US$)

(US$)(a)

(b)

(c)


(d)


(e)


(f)


(g)


(h)


(i)

(j)Richard DeCicco

2010

265,000
(1)(2)


0



0



0



0



0



0

265,0002009

265,000
(1) (2)


0



1,597,236
(3)


0



0



0



0

1, 862 ,236President, CEO

2008

265,000
(6)


0


$
273,096
(5)


90,700
(4)


0



0



0

628,7962007

265,000
(7)


0



0



0



0



0



0

265,000William Blacker

CFO, SVP of

2010

173,643
(8) (14)


0



0



0



0



0



0

173,6432009

173,643
(8)(11)


0



10,000
(9)


0
(10)


0



0



0

183 ,643Finance

2008

165,375
(8)(12)


0



0



0
(10)


0



0



0

165 ,3752007

150,000
(10)(13)


0



0



16,850
(10)


0



0



0

166,850
 _______________________
 1.
Pursuant to terms of the Employment Agreement dated January 23, 2007 between Richard DeCicco and the Company (“DeCicco Employment Agreement”), Mr. DeCicco is entitled to an annual salary of $265,000 for a period of five years commencing on January 1, 2008.
 
 2.
As of December 31, 2010, Mr. DeCicco did not receive any payments from the Company for such salary.
 
 3.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 15,972, 356 shares of common stock to Mr. DeCicco valued at $.10 per share. The shares had an estimated fair value of $1,597,236 on the date of the grant.
 
 4.
Pursuant to DeCicco Employment Agreement, Mr. DeCicco was granted 1,000,000 stock options at an exercise price (to represent a discount to the market price estimated at $0.10 per share) of which 200,000 shall vest on December 31 of each year until fully vested.  The options have an estimated fair value of $90,700 as of the date of the Decicco Employment Agreement. As of the date of this report, the options have not been exercised.
 
 5.
On August 8, 2008, the Company issued 2,731 (2,730,960 pre reverse stock split) shares of common stock to Mr. DeCicco in consideration for services rendered valued in the amount of $273,096 or $0.10 pre reverse stock split shares. The shares have an estimated fair value of $273,096 on the date of the grant.
 
 
 19
 
 6.
As of December 31, 2008, Mr. DeCicco was paid $24,300 of his annual salary of $265,000. As of the date hereof, the remaining balance is owed by the Company to Mr. DeCicco.
 
 7.
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. DeCicco was paid $88,600 of his annual salary of $265,000. As of the date hereof, the remaining balance is owed by the Company to Mr. DeCicco.
 
 8.
Pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2007, between William Blacker and the Company (“Blacker Employment Agreement”), Mr. Blacker is entitled to a salary of $150,000 for the first year and a raise of 5% per annum.
 
 9.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Blacker valued at $.10 per share. The shares have an estimated fair value of $10,000 on the date of the grant.
 
 10.
Pursuant to Blacker Employment Agreement, Mr. Blacker was granted 300,000 stock options.  The options vested as follows: 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.05 per share upon execution of the agreement; (B) 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.15 per share on October 1, 2008; and (C) 100,000 options at an exercise price of $.75 per share on October 1, 2009. The options have an estimated fair value of $16,850 on the date of the grant (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions disclosed in note 9 of the consolidated financial statements) . As of the date of this report, the options have not been exercised.
 
 11.
Pursuant to Blacker Employment Agreement, Mr Blacker was entitled to $173,643 as salary for 2009. As of the dated hereof, the entire amount is still owing to Mr. Blacker.
 
 12.
As of December 31, 2008, Mr. Blacker’s salary was $165,375 of which Mr. Blacker was paid a total $25,962. As of the date hereof, the remaining balance is owed by the Company to Mr. Blacker.
 
 13.
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Blacker was paid a pro-rated salary of $34,615.
 
 14.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, Mr. Blacker was entitled to a salary of $ 173,643. As of the date hereof,  the entire amount is still owing to the Company.On September 15, 2010, William Blacker resigned from his position as an officer of the Company.
 
 Outstanding Equity Awards
 
 The table set forth below presents certain information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer above outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
 
 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-ENDOPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDSName

(a)

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Exercisable

(b)


Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options

(#)

Unexercisable

(c)


Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options

(#)

(d)


Option Exercise Price

($)

(e)

Option Expiration Date

(f)

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

(#)

(g)


Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

($)

(h)


Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

(i)


Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

(#)

(j)Richard DeCicco

President, CEO


1,000,000
(1)


0



0


$
0.10

06/1/2018


600,000



0



0



0William Blacker

CFO, SVP of

Finance


300,000
(2)


0



0




(2)
04/1/11


0



0



0



0
 ________________
 (1)  Pursuant to an Employment Agreement, dated January 23, 2008, between our Company and Richard DeCicco, our Chief Executive Officer and Director, we granted to Mr. DeCicco 1,000,000 stock options, vesting at the rate of 200,000 stock options per year over the five years period commencing December 31, 2008 and are exercisable until June 1, 2011.  As of December 31, 2009, 400,000 of such stock options had vested. The options have an estimated fair value of $90,700 as of the date of the grant.
 
 20
 
 (2)  Pursuant to an Employment Agreement, dated October 1, 2007, between our Company and William Blacker, our Chief Financial Officer, we granted to Mr. Blacker stock options vested (i) upon execution of the agreement, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.05 per share; (ii) on October 1, 2008, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and (iii) on October 1, 2009, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The vested stock options are exercisable until April 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2010, 300,000 of such stock options had vested. The options have an estimated fair value of $16,850 as of the date of the grant.
 
 Compensation of Directors
 
 During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, no director received any type of compensation from the Company in exchange for their services as directors. No arrangements are presently in place regarding compensation to directors for their services as directors or for committee participation or special assignments.
  ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
 The following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock beneficially owned on April 15, 2010, for (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group.




Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

No. of

Shares


Percent

of

Class


No. of

Shares


Percent

Of

Class


Percent of Combined Voting

Power of All Classes (4)Richard DeCicco


16,375,090 (5)



31.1%(6)



1



66.7%



79%Donald Chadwell


2,586,753



4.92%



0



0



2%All executive officers and directors, as a group (1 person)


16,375,090



31.1%



1



66.7%



79%
 
 Notes
 
 (1)
Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified herein have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown as beneficially held by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.(2)
Applicable percentage of ownership is based on 52,519,307 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to such securities. Shares of Common Stock subject to securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of Common Stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within sixty (60) days are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options, warrants, rights, conversion privileges or similar obligations, for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.(3)
Applicable percentage ownership is based on one (1) share of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and calculated by taking the voting power of the Series A as included with the class of Common Stock.(4)
Applicable percentage of combined voting power is based on (i) 52,519,307 shares of Common Stock, and (ii) one (1) shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which votes together as a single class with the Common Stock on all matters subject to stockholder approval and has voting power equal to two (2) votes for every share of Common Stock outstanding.(5)
The number of shares owned by Mr. DeCicco includes, 15,972,359 shares of common stock issued pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 10, 2009; 2,731 shares of common stock issued on August 8, 2008 in consideration for services rendered; and 400,000 shares of common stock to be issued upon the exercise of options vested as of December 31, 2010, in accordance with the terms of the Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. DeCicco. 200,000 additional shares were scheduled to be vested to Mr. DeCicco on December 31, 2010 were not vested due to the foreclosure and the current financial position of the Company.(6)
The percentage of class of common stock owned by Mr. DeCicco is calculated based on 52,919,309  shares issued and outstanding on a fully diluted basic had Mr. DeCicco exercise the options at December 31, 20010.
 21
 ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
 Family Relationships
 
 There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers.
 
 Code of Ethics
 
 We currently do not have a code of ethics that applies to our officers, employees and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives, however, we intend to adopt one in the near future.
 
 Conflicts of Interest
 
 Certain potential conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships between our officers and directors, and us.
 
 From time to time, one or more of our affiliates may form or hold an ownership interest in and/or manage other businesses both related and unrelated to the type of business that we own and operate.  These persons expect to continue to form, hold an ownership interest in and/or manage additional other businesses which may compete with ours with respect to operations, including financing and marketing, management time and services and potential customers.  These activities may give rise to conflicts between or among the interests of us and other businesses with which our affiliates are associated.  Our affiliates are in no way prohibited from undertaking such activities, and neither we nor our shareholders will have any right to require participation in such other activities.
 
 Further, because we intend to transact business with some of our officers, directors and affiliates, as well as with firms in which some of our officers, directors or affiliates have a material interest, potential conflicts may arise between the respective interests of us and these related persons or entities.  We believe that such transactions will be effected on terms at least as favorable to us as those available from unrelated third parties.
 
 With respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we have adopted policies and procedures which require that: (i) the fact of the relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or known to the directors who authorize or approve the transaction prior to such authorization or approval, (ii) the transaction be approved by a majority of our disinterested outside directors, and (iii) the transaction be fair and reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our directors.
 
 ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
 
 (1) Audit Fees
 
 The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for our audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our Form 10-K or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years was:
 
 2010

$
_______

Michael T. Studer CPA P.C.2009

$
27,500

Michael T. Studer CPA P.C.
 
 Audit Related Fees
 
 There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
 Tax Fees
 
 For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we were not billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
 
 All Other Fees
 
 The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
 22
 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:
 
 -             approved by our audit committee; or
 
 -             entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular  service,  the  audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.
 
 We do not have an audit committee.  Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees was pre-approved.  However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.
  23
  PART IV
 
 ITEM 15.      EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
 
 a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report
 
 1. Financial Statements
 
 2. Financial Statement Schedules
 
 3. Exhibits
 
 Exhibit No.

Documents2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)3.1

Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007)3.1.1

Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)3.1.2

Nevada Articles of Merger (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)3.1.2

New York Certificate of Merger (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)3.2

Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007)4.1

Specimen Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2007)4.2

Certificate of Designations For The Series A (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)4.3

Certificate Of Designations For The Series B (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)4.4

Promissory Note made by the Company in favor of Capstone Capital Group I, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)4.5

Promissory Note dated December 2009 made by the Company in favor of Double U Master Fund, L.P., in the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ((filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 18, 2009)4.6

Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25, 2009)4.7

Promissory Note dated January 4, 2010 made by the Company in favor of Marvin Mermelstein in the principal sum of One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars (filed as Exhibit4.7 to the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2011)4.8

Promissory Note dated January 13, 2010 made by the Company in favor of Marvin Mermelstein in the principal sum of One Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars (filed as Exhibit4.8 to the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2011)4.9

Certification of Designation of the series A convertible preferred stock4.10

Certification of Designation of the series B convertible preferred stock10.1

Purchase Order Agreement dated January 22, 2007 between the Company and Capstone Capital Group I, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2011)10.2

Discount  Factoring Agreement dated January 22, 2007 between the Company and Capstone Business, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2011)
 
 24
 
 Table of Contents
 
 10.3

Termination Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)10.4

Form of Conversion Agreement (filed as Exhibit10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)10.5

License Agreement dated April 26, 2007 between the Company and Seven Cellos LLC(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2011)10.6

Addendum To License Agreement dated June 2009 by and between Seven Cellos LLC and Harbrew Imports, Ltd. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2009)10.7

Reserved10.8

Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and DeCicco. (filed with Amended Quarterly Report for June 30, 2010)10.9

Employment Agreement dated October 1, 2007 between the Company and William Blacker. (filed with Amended Quarterly Report for June 30, 2010)10.10

Merchandising License Agreement dated June 12, 2009 between the Harbrew Imports Ltd. and Paramount Licensing Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2011)10.11

Lease Agreement dated July 12, 2002 between  Fred and Joseph Scalamandre, as landlords and Islander Imports and Packaging, Inc., as Tenants (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2011).10.12

Exclusive Manufacturing Agreement, dated August 2007, with Fagema Sorrento Delizie Di De Luca Antonino and Scala Antonino (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 18, 2011)10.13

Form of Subscription Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2011).14.1

Code of Ethics (filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2009)31

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
  25
  SIGNATURES


In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 ICONIC BRANDS, INC.Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/Richard DeCiccoRichard DeCiccoPresident, Principal Executive, financial and Accounting Officer
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
 ICONIC BRANDS, INC.Date: April 15, 2011
By:
/s/Richard DeCiccoRichard DeCiccoPresident, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
 26




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM















F-1




Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Consolidated Balance Sheets
 (Unaudited)
 December 31,

December 31,2010

2009AssetsCurrent assets:Cash
$
225
$
23,889Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $ 0 and $35,000, respectively

-

254,268Inventories

-

393,811Prepaid stock-based compensation arising out of consulting agreement (Note 9)

124,507

-Advance to overseas vendor toward purchases of inventories

-

297,684Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 5)

784

93,456Total current assets

125,516

1,063,108Property, plant and equipment, net

-

7,273License agreement costs, net of accumulated amortization of $ 0 and $0, respectively

-

-Restricted cash

-

75,000Total assets
$
125,516
$
1,145,381Liabilities and Stockholders' DeficiencyCurrent liabilities:Current portion of debt
$
641,320
$
803,064Accounts payable

1,305,109

1,290,680Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

1,783,044

1,500,652Total current liabilities

3,729,473

3,594,396Long term debt

1,643,465

1,774,944Series B Preferred Stock, $2.00 per share stated value; designated 1,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding916,603 and 916,603 shares, respectively - an equity security with characteristics of a liability

1,833,206

1,833,206Total liabilities

7,206,144

7,202,546Stockholders' deficiencyPreferred stock, $.00001 par value;authorized 100,000,000 shares:Series A, designated 1 share, issued and outstanding1 and 1 shares, respectively

1

1Common stock, $.00001 par value; authorized 100,000,000shares, issued and committed to be issued and outstanding 52,519,307and 44,810,411 shares, respectively

525

448Additional paid-in capital

8,810,656

7,327,955Accumulated deficit

(15,891,810)

(13,385,569)Total stockholders' deficiency

(7,080,628)

(6,057,165)Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency
$
125,516
$
1,145,381 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
  F-2
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Consolidated Statements of Operations
 (Unaudited)
  Year EndedDecember 31,2010


2009Sales

$
371,313


$
773,555Cost of goods sold


235,744



613,494Gross profit


135,569



160,061Selling, general and administrative expenses:Selling, marketing and promotion


379,250



331,306Administrative compensation and benefits


437,386



860,275Stock-based compensation issued in connection with merger


-



2,272,108Professional fees


632,877



692,062Occupancy and warehousing


95,101



155,793Travel and entertainment


62,891



115,787Office


18,452



36,678Licenses and permits


31,878



4,315Other


16,092



40,764Total


1,673,927



4,509,088Loss from operations


(1,538,358
)


(4,349,027
)Other income


-



98,411Interest expense


(333,962
)


(656,818
)Loss on disposition of assets seized by lender on defaulted promissory note (Note 3)


(633,921
)


-Loss before income taxes


(2,506,241
)


(4,907,434
)Income taxes


-



-Net Loss

$
(2,506,241
)

$
(4,907,434
)Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

$
(0.05
)

$
(0.13
)Weighted average number of common sharesoutstanding - basic and diluted


50,601,821



36,613,416
 
 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
  F-3
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficiency Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
  Series APreferred Stock,


Common Stock,


Additional$.00001 par


$.00001 par


Paid-In


AccumulatedShares


Amount


Shares


Amount


Capital


Deficit


TotalBalance at December 31, 2008


-


$
-



24,909


$
-


$
1,278,656


$
(8,478,135
)

$
(7,199,479
)Issuance of stock to management and employees on June 10, 2009


1



1



19,634,112



196



2,063,214



-



2,063,411Issuance of stock to Danny DeVito and affiliates on June 10, 2009


-



-



2,086,973



21



208,676



-



208,697Issuance of stock to Note holders on June 10, 2009 in satisfaction of debt and accrued interest


-



-



4,606,307



46



2,303,108



-



2,303,154Issuance of stock to Capstone on June 10, 2009 in connection with Termination Agreement


-



-



1,000,000



10



499,990



-



500,000Acquisition of Harbrew Imports, Ltd. on June 10, 2009


-



-



15,158,000



152



(152
)


-



-Issuance of stock to Note holders in July and August 2009 in satisfaction of debt and accrued interest.


-



-



300,110



3



150,644



-



150,647Sale of Units at $.50 per unit on August 19,2009, less placement costs of $55,000


-



-



1,000,000



10



444,990



-



445,000Fair value of warrants included in sale of convertible promissory note in August 2009


-



-



-



-



82,440



-



82,440Issuance of stock to consultant in October 2009


-



-



1,000,000



10



199,990



-



200,000Fair value of reduction of exercise price of warrants in connection with debt financing in December 2009


-



-



-



-



61,310



-



61,310Stock options and warrants compensation expense


-



-



-



-



35,089



-



35,089Net loss


-



-



-



-



-



(4,907,434
)


(4,907,434
)Balance at December 31, 2009


1



1



44,810,411



448



7,327,955



(13,385,569
)


(6,057,165
)Issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with $220,000 promissory notes


-



-



200,000



2



78,928



-



78,930Issuance of common stock in satisfaction of convertible notes and accrued interest


-



-



152,546



2



76,271



-



76,273Issuance of common stock and warrants in connection with License Agreement with Tony Siragusa


-



-



250,000



2



144,798



-



144,800Issuance of common stock to consulting firm in February 2010


-



-



300,000



3



68,997



-



69,000Issuance of common stock and warrants to consulting firm in March 2010


-



-



2,000,000



20



595,980



-



596,000Issuance of common stock in connection with extension of due date of $110,000 promissory note


-



-



250,000



2



21,398



-



21,400Issuance of common stock and warrants in satisfaction of debt and accrued interest


-



-



4,556,350



46



455,589



-



455,635Stock options and warrants compensation expense


-



-



-



-



40,740



-



40,740Net loss


-



-



-



-



-



(2,506,241
)


(2,506,241
)Balance at December 31, 2010


1


$
1



52,519,307


$
525


$
8,810,656


$
(15,891,810
)

$
(7,080,628
)
 
 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
  F-4
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 (Unaudited)
 Year Ended December 31,2010


2009Cash flows from operating activities:Net Loss

$
(2,506,241
)


(4,907,434
)Adjustments to reconcile net lossto net cash used in operating activities:Loss on disposition of assets seized by lender ondefaulted promissory note(Note 3), less $1,552 cash seized


632,369



-Depreciation


3,033



4,171Amortization of license agreement costs


25,538



-Amortization of debt discountscharged to interest expense


200,412



311,316Stock-based compensation


581,233



2,714,868Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable, net


226,574



229,896Inventories


(62,758
)


344,696Prepaid expenses and other current assets


151,272



(3,042
)Restricted cash and cash equivalents


25,000



25,000Accounts payable


14,429



(191,236
)Accrued expenses and other currentliabilities


282,392



932,923Net cash used inoperating activities


(426,747
)


(538,842
)Cash flows from investing activities:Property, plant and equipment additions


-



(5,150
)Cash flows from financing activities:Increases in debt, net


709,518



449,000Repayment of debt


(306,435
)


(337,089
)Sale of Units of common stock andwarrants, net of placement costs


-



445,000Net cash provided byfinancing activities


403,083



556,911Increase (decrease) in cash


(23,664
)


12,919Cash, beginning of period


23,889



10,970Cash, end of period

$
225


$
23,889Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:Interest paid

$
23,190


$
264,621Income taxes paid

$
-


$
-Non-cash financing activities:Issuance of common stock and warrants inconnection with $220,000 promissory notes

$
78,930


$
-Shares of common stock issued to noteholders insatisfaction of debt and accrued interest

$
531,908


$
2,453,801Issuance of common stock and warrants inconnection with License Agreement withTony Siragusa

$
144,800


$
-Securities issued to Capstone in connection withTermination Agreement and satisfaction of debt:Unsecured promissory note

$
-


$
500,000Series B preferred stock


-



1,833,206Common stock


-



500,000Total

$
-


$
2,833,206
 
 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
  F-5


Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 
 1.  ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS
 
 Iconic Brands, Inc., formerly Paw Spa, Inc. (“Iconic Brands”), was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 21, 2005. Our plan was to provide mobile grooming and spa services for cats and dogs. Our services were going to include bathing, hair cutting and styling, brushing/combing, flea and tick treatments, nail maintenance and beautification, ear cleaning, teeth cleaning, hot oil treatments, and massage. We did not have any business operations and failed to generate any revenues.  We abandoned this business, as we lacked sufficient capital resources.  On June 10, 2009, the Company acquired Harbrew Imports, Ltd. (“Harbrew New York”), a New York corporation incorporated on September 8, 1999 which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Harbrew Imports, Ltd. Corp. (“Harbrew Florida”), a Florida corporation incorporated on January 4, 2007.  On the Closing Date, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued to the designees of Harbrew New York 27,352,301 shares of our Common Stock at the Closing, or approximately 64% of the 42,510,301 shares outstanding subsequent to the merger.  After the merger, Harbrew New York continued as the surviving company under the laws of the state of New York and became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
 
 In anticipation of the merger between Iconic Brands, Inc. and Harbrew New York, on May 1, 2009 the Board of Directors and a majority of shareholders of Harbrew New York approved the amendment of its Articles of Incorporation changing its name to Iconic Imports, Inc. (“Iconic Imports”). On June 22, 2009, this action was filed with the New York State Department of State.
 
 Prior to the merger on June 10, 2009, Iconic Brands had no assets, liabilities, or business operations.  Accordingly, the merger has been treated for accounting purposes as a recapitalization by the accounting acquirer Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports and the financial statements reflect the assets, liabilities, and operations of Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports from its inception on September 8, 1999 to June 10, 2009 and are combined with Iconic Brands thereafter.  Iconic Brands and its wholly-owned subsidiary Harbrew New York/Iconic Imports are hereafter referred to as the “Company”.
 
 The Company was a brand owner of self-developed alcoholic beverages.  Furthermore, the Company imported, marketed and sold these beverages throughout the United States and globally.
 
 Effective June 10, 2009, prior to the merger, Harbrew Florida affected a 1-for-1,000 reverse stock split of its common stock, reducing the issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 24,592,160 to 24,909, which includes a total of 317 shares resulting from the rounding of fractional shares.  All share information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split.
 
 On August 20, 2010 (see Note 11), the Company and Seven Cellos LLC terminated the License Agreement relating to the distribution of an alcoholic beverage known as “Danny DeVito’s Premium Limoncello”. In the year ended December 31, 2010, this brand accounted for approximately 96% of total sales.
 
 On August 20, 2010 (see Notes 3 and 8), Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, a holder of a Promissory Note with a then remaining balance of approximately $233,000, delivered a Formal Notice of Default to the Company demanding payment of the balance on or before September 1, 2010. On September 16, 2010, Capstone delivered a Notification of Disposition of Collateral to the Company notifying the Company of its attachment of the Collateral (including cash, accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, and contract rights) and its intent to sell the Collateral to the highest qualified bidder in a public sale on September 28, 2010.  On September 28, 2010, Capstone acquired the Collateral in exchange for the Promissory Note at the public auction sale; there were no other bidders.
 
 On September 14, 2010 (see Note 11), the Second District Court of Suffolk County New York issued a Warrant of Eviction removing the Company from its Lindenhurst, New York office.
 
 2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 (a)  Basis of Presentation
 
 The financial statements have been prepared on a “going concern” basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Iconic Imports had its assets taken by the secured lender Capstone Capital Group I, LLC in satisfaction of their promissory note which had been defaulted on by Iconic Imports, Inc., leaving negative working capital of $3,603,957 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $7,080,628.  Further, from inception to December 31, 2010, the Company incurred losses of $15,891,810.  These factors create substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company plans to improve its financial condition by reorganizing and acquiring a new business.  However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing this objective.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
  F-6
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 (b)  Use of Estimates
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 (c) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
 The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, current portion of debt, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and long term debt.  Except for long term debt, the fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets due to their short term maturity.
 
 (d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
 The Company considers all liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
 (e)  Accounts Receivable, Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
 
 The Company extended unsecured credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business but mitigated the associated risks by performing credit checks and actively pursuing past due accounts.  An allowance for doubtful accounts was established and recorded based on historical experience and the aging of the related accounts receivable.
 
 (f) Inventories
 
 Inventories were stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market, with due consideration given to obsolescence and to slow moving items.
 
 (g) Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net
 
 Property, plant, and equipment, net, were stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation was calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.
 
 (h)  Revenue Recognition
 
 Revenue from product sales was recognized when all of the following criteria were met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement existed, (2) the price was fixed or determinable, (3) collectability was reasonably assured, and (4) delivery had occurred.  Persuasive evidence of an arrangement and fixed price criteria were satisfied through purchase orders.  Collectability criteria were satisfied through credit approvals.  Delivery criteria were satisfied when the products were shipped to a customer and title and risk of loss passed to the customer in accordance with the terms of sale.  The Company has no obligation to accept the return of products sold other than for replacement of damaged products.  Other than quantity price discounts negotiated with customers prior to billing and delivery (which are reflected as a reduction in sales), the Company did not offer any sales incentives or other rebate arrangements to customers.
 
 (i) Shipping and Handling Costs
 
 Shipping and handling costs were reported as selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, shipping and handling costs were not material.
 
 F-7
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 (j) Advertising
 
 Advertising costs were expensed as incurred and are included in selling, marketing, and promotion expense.  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, advertising expenses were $4,000 and $0, respectively.
 
 (k) Stock-Based Compensation
 
 Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation- Stock Compensation”.  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, stock-based compensation totaled $581,233 and $2,714,868, respectively.  These amounts consist of stock-based compensation given to Company officers and employees and consulting firms, which are included in administrative compensation and benefits and professional fees, respectively.
 
 (l) Foreign Currency Transactions
 
 Gains and losses arising on settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in other selling, general and administrative expenses.  For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, foreign currency transaction losses were $0.
 
 (m) Income Taxes
 
 Income taxes are accounted for under the assets and liability method.  Current income taxes are provided in accordance with the laws of the respective taxing authorities.  Deferred income taxes are provided for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.   Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is not more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
 
 (n) Net Income (Loss) per Share
 
 Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average   number of common shares outstanding during the period.
 
 Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive securities (such as stock options, warrants, and convertible securities) outstanding.  Dilutive securities having an anti-dilutive effect on diluted net income (loss) per share are excluded from the calculation.
 
 For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, diluted common shares outstanding excluded the following dilutive securities as the effect of their inclusion was anti-dilutive:
 
 Year EndedDecember 31,2010


20097% convertible notes and accrued interest


615,845



738,30210% convertible notes and accrued interest


214,494



199,5348% convertible note and accrued interest


29,698,571



-Series B preferred stock owned by Capstone CapitalGroup I, LLC (see Notes 3, 8 and 9)


537,912,559



12,667,699Stock Options


300,000



300,000Warrants


19,522,184



11,765,834Total


588,263,653



25,671,369
 
 F-8
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 (o) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
 Certain accounting pronouncements have been issued by the FASB and other standard setting organizations which are not yet effective and have not yet been adopted by the Company.  The impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations from adoption of these standards is not expected to be material.
 
 3. LOSS ON DISPOSITION OF ASSETS ATTACHED BY LENDER ON DEFAULTED PROMISSORY NOTE
 
 On September 16, 2010 (see Notes 1 and 8), Capstone Capital Group I, LLC, delivered a Notification of Disposition of Collateral to the Company notifying the Company of its attachment of the Collateral securing the defaulted Promissory Note and its intent to sell the Collateral to the highest qualified bidder in a public sale on September 28, 2010.  On September 28, 2010, Capstone acquired the Collateral in exchange for the Promissory Note at the public auction sale; there were no other bidders.  Accordingly, the Company recognized a default loss of $633,921, equal to the excess of the carrying value of the respective Collateral assets over the amount of debt retired, as follows:
 
 Amount of debt retired from disposition of Collateral assets

$
233,075Carrying value of Collateral assets:Cash


1,552Accounts receivable, net


27,694Inventories


456,569Advances to overseas vendor toward purchase of inventories


207,476Property, plant and equipment, net


4,240License agreement costs, net


119,262Restricted cash


50,203Total


866,996Loss on disposition of assets attached by lender on defaulted promissory note

$
(633,921
)
 4.  INVENTORIES
 
 Inventories consist of:
 
 December 31,


December 31,2010


2009Danny DeVito's Premium Limoncello ( Liqueur) brand

$
-


$
13,626Hot Irishman (Irish coffee) brand


-



125,718Scotch Whiskey


-



108,470George Vesselle ( champagne) brand


-



75,110Other


-



145,013Total


-



467,937Reserve for slow moving


-



(74,126
)Net

$
-


$
393,811
 
 On September 16, 2010, the Company wrote off inventories totaling $456,569 pursuant to the seizure of Collateral (see Note 3).
  F-9
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 5.  PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
 
 Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of:
 
 December 31,


December 31,2010


2009Royalty advance

$
-


$
60,000Other


784



33,456Total

$
784


$
93,456
 
 On September 16, 2010, the Company wrote off advances to overseas vendor toward purchase of inventories of $207,476 pursuant to the seizure of Collateral (see Note 3).
 
 6.  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
 
 Property, plant and equipment, net, consist of:
 
 December 31,


December 31,2010


2009Vehicles

$
-


$
126,295Office and warehouse equipment


-



20,853Total


-



147,148Accumulated depreciation


-



(139,875
)Net

$
-


$
7,273
 
 On September 16, 2010, the Company wrote off property, plant, and equipment, net, of $4,240 pursuant to the seizure of Collateral (see Note 3).
 
 7.    LICENSE AGREEMENT COSTS, NET
 
 License agreement costs, net, changed in the year ended December 31, 2010 as follows:
  Fair value of 250,000 shares of common stock, 500,000 5 year warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share, and 500,000 5 year warrants exercisable at $1.50 per share issued in connection with licenseagreement with Tony Siragusa dated January 15, 2010.

$
144,800Amortization for the period January 15, 2010 to September 16, 2010


(25,538
)Writeoff of balance pursuant to the seizure of Collateral on September 16, 2010 (see Note 3)


(119,262
)Balance, December 31, 2010

$
-
 
 As more fully described in Note 11, the Company entered into a four year License Agreement with Tony Siragusa on January 15, 2010 in connection with the use of Tony Siragusa’s name relating to the sale of YO Vodka.  The fair value of the common stock ($50,000) and warrants ($94,800) on January 15, 2010 was capitalized and was being amortized over the four year term of the License Agreement as selling, marketing and promotion expenses.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 2.44%, volatility of 100%, and term of five years.
  F-10
 
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 
 8.    DEBT
 
 Debt consists of:
 
 December 31,


December 31,2010


2009Due under Discount Factoring Agreement
(A)

$
-


$
85,887Convertible notes, interest at 7% (default rate of 14%)August 27, 2012 to  November 27, 2012, net of unamortizeddiscounts of $22,766 and $52,328, respectively
(B)


127,234



160,172Promissory note, interest at 20%, due January 29, 2009



100,000



100,000Secured Promissory note payable to Capstone Capital Group I, LLC,interest at 7%, was due in installments untilJune 10, 2011 - defaulted/collateral seized (see Note 3)
(A)


-



334,523Convertible promissory note, interest of 7%, due September 13, 2014,net of unamortized discount of $61,107 and $77,595, respectively
(B)


38,893



22,405Loans payable, interest at 0%, due on demand



186,320



249,000Loan payable, interest at 12%, due January 14, 2010,net of unamortized discount of $0 and $26,823, respectively



-



73,177Promissory notes, interest at 13%, due May 31, 2010



220,000



-Convertible promissory note, interest at 8% ( default rate of 22%),due February 7, 2011
(B)


60,000



-Convertible promissory notes, interest at 10%due October 25, 2007 to November 27, 2007
(B)


75,000



75,000Due Donald Chadwell (5% stockholder at December 31, 2010),interest at 0%, no repayment terms



763,000



763,000Due Richard DeCicco ( officer, director, and 30% stockholder at December 31, 2010)and affiliates, interest at 0%, no repayment terms



714,338



714,844Total



2,284,785



2,578,008Less current portion of debt



(641,320
)


(803,064
)Long term debt


$
1,643,465


$
1,774,944
 
 F-11
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 
 At December 31, 2010, the debt is due as follows:
  Past due

$
395,000Year ending December 31, 2011


246,320Year ending December 31, 2012


150,000Year ending December 31, 2013


-Year ending December 31, 2014


100,000Year ending December 31, 2015


-No repayment terms ( due two significantstockholders)


1,477,338Total


2,368,658Less debt discounts


(83,873
)Net

$
2,284,785
 (A) On January 22, 2007, the Company entered into a  Purchase Order Financing Agreement with a term of two years, that provided for advances of credit from Capstone Capital Group I, LLC (the “Secured Party”) to the Company.  Among other things, the agreement provided for fees to the Secured Party equal to 2.5% for the first 30 days (or part thereof) that each advance was outstanding and 1.25% for every 14 days (or part thereof) that such advance remained outstanding. On June 10, 2009, the Company entered into a termination agreement with Capstone (the “Termination Agreement”) whereby Capstone agreed to forgive the $2,833,205 balance owed it under the Purchase Order Financing Agreement in exchange for: (i) a $500,000 7% promissory note (the “Promissory Note”); (ii) 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock; (iii) $1,833,205 worth of Series B Preferred Stock; and (iv) a 3-year warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.  The Promissory Note was payable in 24 monthly installments of $10,000 commencing July 10, 2009, $100,000 on or before June 10, 2010, and the remaining $160,000 on or before June 10, 2011.  If the Company closed a financing prior to maturity of the Promissory Note, up to 50% of the proceeds were to be used to prepay the remaining balance of the Promissory Note. The Discount Factoring Agreement was dated January 22, 2007 and provided for financing of certain Company accounts receivable by Capstone Business Credit, LLC (the “Factor”).  Among other things, the agreement provided for commissions to the Factor equal to 2% for the first 30 days (or part thereof) that each such account receivable is outstanding and 1% for every 14 days (or part thereof) thereafter that such account receivable remains outstanding. Fees and commissions charged pursuant to the Purchase Order Financing Agreement and the Discount Factoring Agreement are included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
 
 At December 31, 2010, Capstone holds 916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock which, based on the volume weighted average price per share for the preceding 20 trading days, are convertible into 537,912,559 shares of the Company Common Stock.
  On August 20, 2010 (see Notes 1 nd 3), the Secured Party delivered a Formal Notice of Default to the Company demanding payment of the $233,075 balance on or before September 1, 2010. On September 16, 2010, the Secured Party delivered a Notification of Disposition of Collateral to the Company notifying the Company of its attachment of the Collateral (including accounts receivable, inventories, equipment, and contract rights) and intent to sell the Collateral to the highest qualified bidder in a public sale on September 28, 2010.  On September 28, 2010, Capstone acquired the Collateral in exchange for the Promissory Note at the public auction sale; there were no other bidders.
 
 (B) $325,000 total face value of convertible notes outstanding at December 31, 2010 is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.50 per share. The other $60,000 face value of convertible notes outstanding at December 31, 2010 is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a variable conversion price equal to 60% of the Market Price, as defined.
 
 F-12
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
  Accrued interest payable on debt (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) consisted of:
 
 December 31,


December 31,2010


2009Convertible notes, interest at 7%

$
57,923


$
56,651Promissory note, interest at 13%


30,458



-Convertible note, interest at 8%


2,367Promissory note, interest at 20%


30,027



10,082Convertible promissory notes, interest at 10%


32,247



24,767Total

$
153,022


$
91,500
  F-13
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 
 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 On June 10, 2009, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued to the designees of Harbrew New York 27,352,301 shares of Common Stock at the Closing.  Of this amount:
 
 1)
24,909 shares were issued to Harbrew Florida stockholders,
 2)
19,634,112 shares valued at $1,963,411 were issued to Company management and employees for services, including 15,972,359 shares to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, 100,000 shares to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and 2,586,753 shares to Donald Chadwell,
 3)
2,086,973 shares valued at $208,697 were issued to Danny DeVito and affiliates for services,
 4)
4,606,307 shares were issued to noteholders in satisfaction of $2,125,625 of debt and $177,529 of accrued interest, and
 5)
1,000,000 shares were issued to Capstone as part of the Termination Agreement.
 
 Also, pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 1 share of Series A Preferred Stock valued at $100,000 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for services and 916,603 shares of Series B Preferred Stock valued at $1,833,206 to Capstone as part of the Termination Agreement.
 
 The one share of Series A Preferred Stock entitles the holder to two votes for every share of Common Stock Deemed Outstanding and has no conversion or dividend rights.  Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $2.00 per share, has no voting rights, and is convertible into Common Stock at the lower of (1) $2.00 per share or, (2) the volume weighted average price per share (“VWAP”) for the 20 trading days immediately prior to the Conversion Date.  The Series B Preferred Stock has been classified as a liability (pursuant to ASC 480-10-25-14(a)) since it embodies a conditional obligation that the  Company may settle by issuing a variable number of equity shares and the monetary value of the obligation is based on a fixed monetary amount known at inception.
 
 In the three months ended September 30, 2009, a total of $122,500 of debt and $28,147 of accrued interest was converted into a total of 300,110 shares of Company common stock.
 
 On August 19, 2009, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its common stock at $.50 per share, including 1,000,000 five year warrants with an exercise price of $1.00 per share (which was reduced to $0.01 per share on December 14, 2009 in connection with a $100,000 loan from the investor) and 1,000,000 five year warrants with an exercise price of $1.50 per share, to an investor for total proceeds of $500,000.
 
 On October 6, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant pursuant to a one month consulting agreement for financial services. The Company included this issuance in its consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 in professional fees at the $200,000 estimated fair value of the shares.
 
 On January 6 and 13, 2010, the Company issued a total of 200,000 shares of common stock, 100,000 five year warrants exercisable at $0.22 per share, and 100,000 five year warrants exercisable at $0.23 per share, along with two promissory notes in the amount of $110,000 each (one due March 31, 2010 and one due May 31, 2010), to an investor in exchange for a $200,000 loan.  The fair value of the common stock ($45,000) and warrants ($33,930), along with the $20,000 discount, were recorded as debt discounts, which are being amortized over the terms of the notes as interest expense.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rates of 2.6% and 2.55%, volatility of 100%, and terms of five years.
  F-14
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
  On January 15 and 25, 2010, the Company issued a total of 152,546 shares of common stock to three investors in satisfaction of a total of $62,500 of convertible debt and approximately $13,773 of accrued interest.
 
 On February 8, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock and 1,000,000 warrants to Tony Siragusa pursuant to the License Agreement described in Note 7 above.
 
 On February 24, 2010, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock to CorProminence pursuant to a 45 day consulting agreement dated January 4, 2010.  The $69,000 fair value of the common stock at date of issuance was expensed in full in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and included in professional fees.
 
 On March 16, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 five year warrants exercisable at $0.25 per share to Cresta Capital Strategies pursuant to a one year extension of a consulting agreement.  The fair value of the common stock ($350,000) and warrants ($246,000) at date of issuance was capitalized as a prepaid expense (see note 5) and is being amortized over the one year term as professional fees.  The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 2.37%, volatility of 100%, and term of five years.
 
 On April 19, 2010, the Company satisfied debt totaling $455,635 through its commitment to issue to the respective 5 creditors a total of 4,556,350 shares of its common stock and 4,556,350 three year warrants exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company expects to issue these shares and warrants once it pays its liability to its transfer agent.
 
 On April 19, 2010, the Company agreed to issue to a noteholder 250,000 shares of its common stock in consideration of the noteholder’s extension of the due date (from March 31, 2010 to May 31,2010) of a $110,000 promissory note. The $21,400 fair value of the common stock at date of commitment was expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2010 and included interest expense. The Company expects to issue these shares once it pays its liability to its transfer agent.
 
 On June 22, 2010, 8 shareholders representing a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock approved an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 2,500,000,000 shares.
 
 10. INCOME TAXES
 
 No provision for income taxes was recorded in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 since the Company incurred net losses in these periods.
 
 Based on management’s present assessment, the Company has not yet determined it to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset attributable to the future utilization of the net operating loss carryforward as of December 31, 2010 will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has maintained a 100% valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset in the financial statements at December 31, 2010. The Company will continue to review this valuation allowance and make adjustments as appropriate.
 
 Current United States income tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.
 
 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
 Lease – Company Evicted from Facility
 
 The Company occupied its facilities in Freeport, New York up until March 2009 under a month to month agreement at a monthly rent of $14,350.  In March 2009, the Company moved its facilities to Lindenhurst, New York pursuant to a three year lease agreement providing for annual rentals ranging from $85,100 to $90,283.  Provided certain conditions were met, the Company had an option to renew the lease for an additional two years at annual rentals ranging from $92,991 to $95,781. On September 14, 2010, the Second District Court of Suffolk County issued a Warrant of Eviction removing the Company from its facilities.  At December 31, 2010, accounts payable includes $22,913 of unpaid rent due to the former landlord.  The Company has incurred no additional costs that would be chargeable to operations as a result of the seizure of the premises, including seized assets or out-of-pocket expenses incidental to seizure.
 
 For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, rent expense was $69,639 and $99,115, respectively.
 
 F-15
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 Licensing Agreements
 
 Danny DeVito Brand
 
 On April 26, 2007 and as amended November 1, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive License Agreement with Seven Cellos, LLC (“DDV”), pursuant to which the Company was granted a limited license of certain rights in and to Danny DeVito’s name, likeness and biography for use by the Company in connection with the Danny DeVito Premium Limoncello brand. The term of the Agreement was to continue through perpetuity unless otherwise terminated. In consideration for the license, the Company agreed to pay royalties as follows: a) 5% of Net Profits (as defined) to Behr Abrahamson & Kaller, LLP (“BAK”), (b) a payment of 50% of the remaining Net Profits to DDV after the payment described above; and (c) a payment of 2% of Net Profits to Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP after payment of 50% of Net Profits to DDV.
 
 On August 20, 2010, the Company and DDV terminated the License Agreement. In the year ended December 31, 2010, the Danny DeVito Premium Limoncello brand accounted for approximately 96% of total sales.
 
 For the periods presented, the Company calculated agreement defined cumulative “Net Profits” from the brand to be negative and thus did not pay or accrue any royalty expense under the License Agreement.  The Termination Agreement provides that DDV has not waived or otherwise prejudiced any of its rights with respect to the Company’s past conduct with respect to the brand, including DDV’s right to accrued and unpaid royalties based upon its right to inspect Company records and conduct an audit of the Company reported agreement defined net profit.
 
 Godfather Brand
 
 On June 12, 2009, Iconic Imports, Inc., the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a merchandising license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Paramount Licensing Inc. (“PLI”) granting Iconic Imports the non-exclusive right to use the title of the theatrical motion picture “The Godfather” in connection with the development, importation, marketing, and distribution of an Italian organic vodka and Scotch whiskey throughout the United States. Under the terms of the License Agreement, which has a term of 5 years ending on June 30, 2014 and may be extended to June 30, 2019 upon certain conditions unless it is sooner terminated, the Company agreed to pay PLI a royalty fee of five percent (5%) and guarantee a total of $400,000 in royalties due as follows; (1) $60,000 as an advance payment due upon signing of the License Agreement, (2) $100,000 due on or before November 1, 2010, (3) $100,000 due on or before November 1, 2011, and (4) $140,000 due on or before November 1, 2012. In addition, PLI was granted warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in substantially the same form as other warrants previously issued, which is (a) a five-year warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share; and (b) a five-year warrant to purchase 1,333,334 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. On August 12, 2009, the Company paid $60,000 to PLI as the advance royalty due under the License Agreement. The License Agreement became effective on this date as the advance payment was a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the License Agreement.
 
 The Company never commenced sales of the product named “The Godfather”.  The second royalty payment of $100,000 due on November 1, 2010 was not paid.  On February 23, 2011, PLI terminated the License Agreement due to nonpayment.
 
 Tony Siragusa Brand
 
 On January 15, 2010, we entered into an exclusive License Agreement with Tony Siragusa, pursuant to which we were granted a limited license to certain rights in and to Tony Siragusa’s name, likeness and biography for use by us in connection with Tony Siragusa’s YO Vodka.  The term of the agreement is four (4) years.  In consideration for the license, we agreed to distribute net profits of the venture as follows: 42.5% to the Company, 42.5% to the licensor, 10% to William Morris Endeavor Entertainment, LLC and 5% to Brian Hughes.  In addition, we issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, 5 year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $1.00 per share, and 5 year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $1.50 per share.  Tony Siragusa agreed to use reasonable efforts to be available for a reasonable number of promotional appearances during each consecutive 12 months period, the duration of each will not exceed six days.  A condition precedent to Tony Siragusa’s performance under the agreement is our applying for a trademark for the brand name “YO Vodka”, with Licensor being designated as a 50% co-owner of such trademark.  We applied for the trademark on March 9, 2010 (trademark application number 77747523), which application is currently being reviewed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  F-16
 
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company calculated agreement defined net profits from the brand to be negative and thus did not pay or accrue any royalty expense under the License Agreement. The product was never introduced to the market. Under the License Agreement, Tony Siragusa has the right to terminate the agreement, upon 10 days written notice to the Company, if the Company fails to launch the distribution of and secure availability to the general public of the beverage throughout the United States prior to June 1, 2010.  The License Agreement does not provide for financial penalties that would be accruable by the Company in the event of a default.
 
 Chief Executive Officer Employment Agreement
 
 On January 23, 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its chief executive officer Richard DeCicco.  The agreement provides for a term of 5 years, commencing on January 1, 2008.  The term can be extended by a written agreement of the parties.  The agreement provides for annual compensation ranging from $265,000 to $350,000.  In addition, if the Company enters into an agreement and further sells any brand in the Company’s portfolio, Mr. DeCicco will receive 5% of such sale.  Mr. DeCicco is also entitled to incentive bonus compensation, stock and/or options in accordance with Company policies established by the Board of Directors.  The agreement provides for the grant of a non-qualified ten year option to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price which shall represent a discount to the market price. Mr. DeCicco has the right to terminate the agreement upon 60 days notice to the Company for any reason.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, if Mr. DeCicco is absent from work because of illness or incapacity cumulatively for more than 2 months in addition to vacation time in any calendar year, the Company may terminate the agreement upon 30 days written notice.  The agreement also provides that the agreement may be terminated upon 90 days notice to Mr. DeCicco if: (A) there is a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets to a single purchaser or group of associated purchasers; (B) there is a sale, exchange or disposition of 50% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s outstanding stock; (C) the Company terminates its business or liquidates its assets; or (D) there is a merger or consolidation of the Company in which the Company’s shareholders receive less than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of the new or continuing corporation. Mr.  DeCicco shall be entitled to severance pay in the amount of 2 years compensation and medical and other benefits in the event of a termination of the agreement under certain circumstances.
 
 Former Chief Financial Officer Employment Agreement
 
 On October 1, 2007, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its chief financial officer William Blacker.  The agreement provides for a term of 3 years, commencing on October 1, 2007.  The term can be extended by a written agreement of the parties.  The Company agreed to issue options to purchase shares of its common stock to Mr. Blacker if and when the common stock becomes publicly traded, as follows: (A) upon execution of the agreement, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.05 per share; (B) on October 1, 2008, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and (C) on October 1, 2009, 100,000 options at an exercise price of $0.75 per share.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Blacker is to receive an annual salary of $150,000.  Mr. Blacker has the right to terminate the agreement upon 60 days notice to the Company for any reason.  The agreement further provides that if the agreement is terminated for any reason other than willful malfeasance by Mr. Blacker, Mr. Blacker shall be entitled to receive severance pay in the amount of 6 months or the balance of the agreement’s term of existence, whichever is greater, and shall receive all benefits under the agreement. Mr. Blacker resigned September 15, 2010.
 
 The $16,850 estimated fair value of the 300,000 options (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: $0.10 stock price, 4% risk free interest rate, 100% volatility, and term of 3.5 years) was being amortized over the 3 year term of the employment agreement as administrative compensation and benefits.
 
 Litigation
 
 The Company is party to a variety of legal proceedings brought by suppliers and creditors.  We accrue for these items as losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.  Most of the amounts sought are included in Company liabilities at December 31, 2010.  While the results of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future consolidated results of operations and financial position.
 
 F-17
  Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 12.  STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
 
 A summary of stock option and warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 follows:
 
 StockOptions


WarrantsOutstanding at December 31, 2008


1,300,000



5,757,500Granted and issued


-



6,173,334Exercised


-



-Forfeited/expired/cancelled


-



(165,000
)Outstanding at December 31, 2009


1,300,000



11,765,834Granted and issued


-



7,756,350Exercised


-



-Forfeited/expired/cancelled


-



-Outstanding at December 31, 2010


1,300,000



19,522,184
 
 Stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010 consist of:
 
 Date

Number


Number


Exercise

ExpirationGranted

Outstanding


Exercisable


Price

DateOctober 1, 2007


100,000



100,000


$
0.05

April 1, 2011October 1, 2007


100,000



100,000


$
0.15

April 1, 2011October 1, 2007


100,000



100,000


$
0.75

April 1, 2011January 1, 2008


1,000,000



-


$
0.10
(a)
June 30, 2013Total


1,300,000



300,000(a) Estimated since exercise price is to be determined based on future stock price
 
 As of December 31, 2010, there was $36,282 of total unrecognized compensation cost relating to unexpired stock options.  That cost is expected to be recognized $18,140 in 2011 and $18,142 in 2012.
 
 F-18
 
 Iconic Brands, Inc. and Subsidiary
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2010 and 2009
 (Unaudited)
 
 Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010 consist of:
 
 Date

Number


Number


Exercise

ExpirationIssued

Outstanding


Exercisable


Price

DateJuly 2, 2007


500,000



500,000


$
1.00

July 2, 2012July 2, 2007


500,000



500,000


$
1.50

July 2, 2012August 27,2007


550,000



550,000


$
1.00

August 27,2012August 27,2007


550,000



550,000


$
1.50

August 27,2012November 8 2007


811,250



811,250


$
1.00

November 8 2012November 8 2007


811,250



811,250


$
1.50

November 8 2012March 5, 2008


192,500



192,500


$
1.00

March 5, 2013March 5, 2008


192,500



192,500


$
1.50

March 5, 2013June 10, 2008


27,500



27,500


$
1.00

June 10, 2013June 10, 2008


27,500



27,500


$
1.50

June 10, 2013June 10, 2008


25,000



25,000


$
1.00

December 10, 2013June 10, 2008


25,000



25,000


$
1.50

December 10, 2013June 11, 2008


30,000



30,000


$
1.00

December 10, 2013June 11, 2008


30,000



30,000


$
1.50

December 10, 2013July 2, 2008


110,000



110,000


$
1.00

January 2, 2014July 2, 2008


110,000



110,000


$
1.50

January 2, 2014July 23, 2008


50,000



50,000


$
1.00

January 23, 2014July 23, 2008


50,000



50,000


$
1.50

January 23, 2014August 11, 2008


1,000,000



1,000,000


$
1.00

August 11, 2013June 10, 2009


1,000,000



1,000,000


$
0.50

June 10, 2012July 23, 2009


20,000



20,000


$
1.00

July 23, 2012July 23, 2009


20,000



20,000


$
1.50

July 23, 2012August 12, 2009


1,000,000



1,000,000


$
1.00

August 12, 2014August 12, 2009


1,333,334



1,333,334


$
1.50

August 12, 2014August 19, 2009


1,000,000



1,000,000


$
0.01

August 19, 2014August 19, 2009


1,000,000



1,000,000


$
1.00

August 19, 2014September 14, 2009


200,000



200,000


$
1.00

September 14. 2014September 14, 2009


200,000



200,000


$
1.50

September 14. 2014September 16,2009


200,000



200,000


$
1.00

July 2, 2012September 16,2009


200,000



200,000


$
1.50

July 2, 2012January 6, 2010


100,000



100,000


$
0.22

January 4, 2015January 13, 2009


100,000



100,000


$
0.23

January 13, 2015February 8, 2010


500,000



500,000


$
1.00

February 8, 2015February 8, 2010


500,000



500,000


$
1.50

February 8, 2015March 16,2010


2,000,000



2,000,000


$
0.25

March 16,2015April 19, 2010


4,556,350



4,556,350


$
0.20

April 14, 2013Total


19,522,184



19,522,184
 
 As of December 31, 2010, there was $63,407 of total unrecognized marketing cost relating to 2,333,334 of the unexpired warrants.  That cost is expected to be recognized $18,388 in 2011, $18,388 in 2012, $18,388 in 2013, and $8,243 in 2014.
 
 F-19