alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 62.5  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 66.5   | 68.6   | 70.1   | 72.6   | 72.7   | 76.6   | 77.4   | 75.4   | 76.7   | 78.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 77.6   | 77.9   | 78.4   | 78.8   | 79.2   | 76.4   | 76.5   | 76.0   | 72.8   | 72.1  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 75.2   | 76.5   | 77.9   | 76.4   | 76.7   | 76.8   | 75.4   | 73.8   | 75.8   | 76.5  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 76.5   | 75.7   | 74.2   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Sylvio PARENT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1556

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BULATHGE GUNARATNA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge.

(CR-86-270-K, CA-95-1470-K)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bulathge Gunaratna, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Moss Ringler, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Appellant alleges that a term of

supervised release included as part of his sentence was improper

under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1981 & Supp. 1995) (current

version at 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(l)(B) (West Supp. 1995)). Appellant's claim is without merit, however, because he was sentenced

under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(B) (West 1981 & Supp. 1995) (current

version at 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(l)(C)(West Supp. 1995), which

allowed for a special parole term. Appellant's motion to expedite

and alter time limits is denied. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Nancy D. Parmelee, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 6, 2004





/s/ Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
No. 12-475.

#### Junkin *v.*Florida.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|U.S. Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 262,483
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 269,790 | 276,987 | 276,014 | 282,152 | 291,773 | 298,541 | 301,811 | 310,971 | 316,929 | 302,421
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 341,678 | 373,304 | 387,772 | 393,327 | 406,147 | 425,887 | 440,516 | 452,945 | 476,652 | 493,100
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 487,627 | 574,593 | 577,916 | 572,742 | 586,213 | 574,530 | 571,659 | 539,875 | 512,675 | 498,072
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 483,326 |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 77 /Wednesday, April 22, 1998 / Notices 20003

1A copy of this list may be obtained by

contacting Mr. Paul Manning, Assistant General

Counsel, at 202/619–5997, and the address is Room

700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20547–0001.

Approved: April 16, 1998.

Garrick R. Shear,

IRS Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 98–10709 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P

UNITED STATES INFORMATION

AGENCY

Culturally Significant Objects Imported

for Exhibition; Determinations

Notice is hereby given of the

following determinations: Pursuant to

the authority vested in me by the Act of

October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985, 22 U.S.C.

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March

27, 1978 (43 FR 13359, March 29, 1978),

and Delegation Order No. 85–5 of June

27, 1985 (50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I

hereby determine that the objects on the

list specified below, to be included in

the exhibit, ‘‘Sir Edward Burne-Jones’’

(See list 1), imported from abroad for the

temporary exhibition without profit

within the United States, are of cultural

significance. These objects are imported

pursuant to loan agreements with the

foreign lenders. I also determine that the

exhibition or display of the listed

exhibit objects at the Metropolitan

Museum of Art, New York City, New

York, from on or about June 1, 1998, to

on or about September 6, 1998, is in the

national interest. Public Notice of these

determinations is ordered to be

published in the Federal Register.

Dated: April 16, 1998.

Les Jin,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 98–10672 Filed 4–21–98; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 042798E]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Buyback 
Committee will hold a work session which is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will begin on Tuesday, May 19, 1998, at 8:30 a.m., 
and will continue throughout the day, as necessary.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Red Lion's Sacramento Inn, 
1401 Arden Way, Sacramento, CA.
     Council address: Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2130 SW Fifth 
Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Walker, Fishery Management 
Analyst; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to revise the 
current groundfish trawl permit buyback program document in preparation 
for the June Council meeting.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Committee for discussion, according to the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be of 
formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to those 
issues specifically identified in the agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Mr. Larry Six at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: April 28, 1998.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-11892 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Charles Edward DUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3158

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas W. Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Missouri Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Missouri Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 33     | 39     | 43     | 10     | 31     | 23     | 48     | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Rainwater

111,757

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
No. 12-6619.

#### Williams *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM v. ELEY, J.

2046 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/29/2017

Reargument Denied 10/25/2017

CP-46-CR-0000714-1998 (Montgomery)

Affirmed
No. 12-6523.

#### C. F. *v.*West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al.

Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.
[Cite as Lenard v. Russo, 133 Ohio St.3d 152, 2012-Ohio-4236.] 

LENARD, APPELLANT, v. RUSSO, JUDGE, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Lenard v. Russo, 133 Ohio St.3d 152, 2012-Ohio-4236.] 

Prohibition—Writ sought to compel judge to vacate a conviction and sentence—

Judge did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction—Court of 

appeals’ dismissal of complaint for writ affirmed. 

(No. 2012-0967—Submitted September 12, 2012—Decided September 20, 2012.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, 

No. 98106, 2012-Ohio-2397. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, 

Richard Lenard, for a writ of prohibition to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County 

Common Pleas Court Judge John J. Russo, to vacate his conviction and sentence 

for violating a temporary protection order. Judge Russo did not patently and 

unambiguously lack jurisdiction to convict and sentence Lenard because the court 

had jurisdiction over the criminal proceeding, including sentencing, see R.C. 

2931.03, and Lenard’s plea of guilty to the charge of violating a temporary 

protection order constituted a complete admission of the charge, Shie v. Leonard, 

84 Ohio St.3d 160, 161, 702 N.E.2d 419 (1998), and Crim.R. 11(B)(1). Lenard 

had an adequate remedy by appeal from his sentencing entry to raise his claim of 

sentencing error. State ex rel. Hudson v. Sutula, 131 Ohio St.3d 177, 2012-Ohio554, 962 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Pruitt v. Donnelly, 129 Ohio St.3d 498, 

2011-Ohio-4203, 954 N.E.2d 117, ¶ 2. 

Judgment affirmed. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

_____________________ 

 Richard Lenard, pro se. 

_____________________
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EDUARDO AYON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50021

D.C. No. 3:06-cr-02162-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2010** 

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Eduardo Ayon appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed following the

revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

SEP 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50021

Ayon contends that the district court failed to adequately explain its

sentence. The district court’s explanation was sufficient and met the requirements

of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). See United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1101 (9th

Cir. 2000).

Ayon also contends that the imposition of supervised release violates

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by

United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.