UNITED
      STATES


SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
      D.C. 20549




FORM
      10-KSB




ANNUAL
      REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934




For
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007


Pebble
      Beach Enterprises, INC.


a
      Nevada
      corporation





1200
      Truxtun Avenue  #130


Bakersfield,
      CA  93301


(661)
      327-0067




Common
      Stock, $0.001 par value  registered under Section 12(g) of The
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934




I.R.S.
      Employer I.D. # 87-0733770




Check
      whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by section 13
      or
      15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
      that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
      to such filing requirements for the past 90 days Yes [x} No [ ]


Check
      if
      there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
      Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained,
      to
      the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
      statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
      amendment thereto.X





Revenues
      for our most recent fiscal year:   $4,516




Number
      of shares of common stock of Pebble Beach Enterprises Inc. outstanding as of
      January 30, 2007: 42,400,000




Indicate
        by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
        12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [x ]





Transitional
      Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): Yes [  ] No
      [X]




-1-


TABLE
      OF CONTENTS




PART
      I


Item
      1.              
Business





Item
      1A.
      Risk
      Factors





Item
      2.              
Properties


Item
      3.              
Legal
      Proceedings


Item
      4.              
Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security
      Holders




PART
      II


Item
      5.              
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder
      Matters


Item
      6.              
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
      Operations


Item
      7.              
Financial
      Statements


Item
      8.              
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
      Disclosures


Item
      8A.            Controls
      and Procedures




PART
      III


Item
      9.              
Directors and Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons,
      Compliance


With
      Section 16(a) of the Exchange
      Act of the
      Registrant


Item
      10.             Executive
      Compensation


Item
      11.             Security
      Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management


Item
      12.             Certain
      Relationships and Related Transactions


Item
      13.             Exhibits,
      Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K


Item
      14.            Principal
      Accountants Fees and Services


Signatures




-2-


Item
        1. Description of Business
  History
        and
        Structure.                                           
We were incorporated in July of 2004 as Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc. in
        the
        state of Nevada. From the date of incorporation until August of 2004, we
        were a
        wholly-owned subsidiary of Fresh Veg Broker.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
        having issued 40,000,000 shares to Fresh Veg – and not issuing any shares to
        anyone else – in exchange for a real estate investment business plan which we
        valued at $0. The business plan is essentially identical to the description
        of
        our business disclosed below. The value of the business plan was determined
        to
        be $0 as only intellectual capital and property was being exchanged for the
        shares, rather than any physical property, and it was difficult to determine
        the
        amount of human labor which went in to the creation of the plan.
  Then,
        in
        August of 2004, we were spun off from Fresh Veg, and in that process the
        shares
        held by Fresh Veg were distributed to its own shareholders on a pro rata
        basis,
        making our shareholder base exactly the same as Fresh Veg’s shareholder
        base.
  The
        business purpose of the spin-off was to separate three distinct, disparate
        business plans so that different, separate entities could focus on each business
        plan. Prior to the spin-off, there was a parent company – Fresh Veg – and two
        subsidiaries. We were one of the two subsidiaries. Our business plan is for
        a
        real-estate investment firm, as described below. The business plan belonging
        to
        the other former subsidiary of Fresh Veg was for a commodities brokerage
        business which specializes in buying commodities and re-selling them.
        Additionally, our then-parent company had planned on acquiring a third
        subsidiary which had certain technologies designed to assist medical insurance
        companies in securely receiving hospital data. Therefore, it was determined
        that
        three business plans – each requiring vastly different types of energy, talent
        and resources to operate – was too dispersing to be operated by one
        conglomerate, and so the two subsidiaries, including us, were spun
        off.
  Subsequent
        to our being spun off from Fresh Veg, Fresh Veg changed its name to Tiger
        Team
        Technologies, Inc. officially on August 16, 2004, in order to better reflect
        the
        change in its business from a real estate investment business – which is the
        business we inherited – to a company that dealt with certain technologies
        designed to assist medical insurance companies in securely receiving hospital
        data.
  Our
        website address iswww.pebblebeachenterprises.com.
  What
        We
        Do.                                
We are a real estate investment corporation with four areas of operation:
        a)
        real estate acquisition and re-sale; b) real estate development and re-sale;
        and
        c) real estate consulting and joint ventures.
  First
        Area of Operation: Real Estate Acquisition and Re-Sale
  The
        business model for our real estate acquisition and re-sale area of operation
        begins with a search for properties in our geographic region of concentration:
        central and coastal California. We look for either fully developed land with
        residential, commercial or industrial structures already in place, or land
        that
        is vacant but with its infrastructure fully integrated - including grading
        and
        tract map completed; plumbing and other services available to the site; and
        all
        titles, liens, easements and other due diligence rights established and
        uncontested. The size of the parcel is unimportant; we look for all sizes
        of
        property, from 1/10th
        of an
        acre to over one thousand acres. Whether the land is fully developed and
        built,
        or vacant but with completed infrastructure, we look for real estate that
        we
        believe to be undervalued. Using no-interest loans from corporations controlled
        by members of our management team, we purchase these undervalued lots and
        then
        re-sell them as soon as practicable for a profit. The loan is paid off and
        the
        profit is retained in our account.
  -3-
 As
        an
        example of this business model, we purchased a house located in the Avalon
        neighborhood of Bakersfield, California on February 24, 2005 for $200,655
        and
        sold it to two individuals through a real estate broker on March 31, 2005
        for
        $287,500, for a total recorded gross profit of $86,845. Adavco, Inc., a
        corporation controlled and operated by our director, Annette Davis, lent
        us
        $310,000 to make the purchase of the property, and we repaid Adavco the
        principal amount, with all interest forgiven, which we are recording as paid-in
        capital. Please see our financial statements.
  Second
        Area of Operation: Real Estate Development and Re-Sale
  Our
        second area of operation, real estate development and re-sale, begins with
        identifying properties of any size in our geographic region of concentration
        we
        believe are undervalued which are neither developed nor integrated into any
        infrastructure. Typically, these properties are farmland or unused land in
        a
        rural area. We perform due diligence on the property – explained below – and
        then, if we determine the property is feasible, we purchase the property
        using a
        loan from a corporation controlled by our sole Director Annette Davis, and
        proceed to upgrade the land by integrating it with infrastructure. This process
        of doing due diligence and upgrading the undeveloped land has several
        steps:
  First,
        we
        search the public records in order to perform proper due diligence on the
        property. Owners of the underground mineral rights are identified, as are
        the
        owners of the surface rights. Titles, deeds, liens, easements, any applicable
        zoning variances and all other encumbrances and any other issues are enumerated.
        Based upon a review of this due diligence, a determination is made as to
        whether
        the project is feasible and the property is worth buying. If it is, we make
        an
        offer to purchase it.
  Second,
        upon purchasing the property, we upgrade it by creating an approved tract
        map,
        the process for which starts when we prepare budgets and projections for
        development, and then draw up an in-house study map. The study map becomes
        a
        tentative tract map which outlines the number of residential lots that will
        fit
        on the land. This tentative tract map is submitted to the relevant municipality
        for approval.
  It
        is
        during this time that we also prepare an Environmental Impact Report, if
        applicable. This means we are mitigating all of the possible environmental
        impacts that our project might create on the environment. Examples of
        Environmental Impact Reports include a traffic impact study to investigate
        the
        effects that a new neighborhood being created would have on the aggregate
        traffic in the surrounding area; an agricultural conversion study, to show
        the
        effect, if any, on overall agricultural land if the property in question
        was
        converted to residential land; and air quality study, to look into how much
        pollution might be created because of the new housing development. All of
        the
        studies have to be addressed and all regulatory and municipal issues mitigated.
        Often we might have to widen roads or add traffic signals, or give a certain
        amount of money for each proposed house to an environmental club or agency
        in
        order to make the project suitable to all the regulatory and municipal
        bodies.
  Where
        zoning is an issue, it is addressed at this juncture as well. Oftentimes,
        agricultural farmland, which has a zoning designation of “agricultural”, has
        already been given an alternative zoning designation, such as “residential” or
“commercial”, by the county or other municipality in which the agricultural
        property sits. This alternative zoning designation is available as an option
        to
        the owners of the agricultural property if and when they wish to develop
        the
        property. When a piece of agricultural property is being developed we generally
        apply for the alternative zoning designation, which can take six to nine
        months.
        However, occasionally we seek to change the alternative zoning designation
        - for
        example, when a piece of agricultural land is given the alternative zoning
        of
“residential” but which we wish to develop as “commercial”. To change the
        alternative zoning we have to apply for a General Plan Amendment zone change
        with the city or county. Because each municipality is only allowed by law
        to
        make GPA’s four times per year, it usually takes nine months or longer to be
        approved for a GPA zone change.
  -4-
 Third,
        we
        continue to upgrade the property by integrating it with available
        infrastructure, which will classify the property as “finished”, meaning ready to
        build on. This final step of development consists of grading the land,
        installing sewers, drains, curbs, gutters, utilities and streets. We tell
        the
        construction crews where the entry and exit points for electric are. Once
        the
        electric company, Pacific Gas & Electric, sends their plan to the engineer,
        it is then forwarded to all the other utility companies, including cable,
        gas
        and telephone, who then review the plan and try to construct their respective
        plans around PG & E’s in order to use the same trench if possible. Complete
        utility plans are a composite with all utilities shown in an overlay to PG
&
E’s.
  Once
        everything has been installed, tested and approved by all relevant governmental
        bodies, the development is ready to be sold as finished lots.
  Once
        the
        upgrading of the property is complete, large construction companies as well
        as
        local builders can be approached to negotiate a purchase and sales agreement
        with Pebble Beach. When the project closes escrow Pebble Beach pays back
        the
        loan and records the remainder as profit.
  Third
        Area of Operation: Consulting and Joint Ventures
  Our
        third
        area of operation is consulting. Under those circumstances where we are not
        buying undeveloped land ourselves, we offer our services to third parties
        as
        real estate consultants, and we actively seek to do joint ventures with owners
        of undeveloped land.
  Under
        this business model, we are not able to purchase the undeveloped land ourselves.
        Either a) another firm has purchased the undeveloped land before we were
        able
        to, or b) the owner of the undeveloped land refuses to sell the property
        to
        us.
  In
        the
        case of a) above, we offer our services as consultants to those buyers of
        undeveloped land who are not familiar with all of the complex laws and
        regulations relating to the performance of due diligence on any given piece
        of
        property in the central and coastal region of California.
  Due
        diligence on properties in our geographical area of concentration is complex
        because California, and in particular the counties making up the central
        and
        coastal regions of the state, have stringent requirements with regard to
        the
        establishment not only of surface rights for any given piece of real estate,
        but
        the underground mineral rights as well, including rights to any oil, natural
        gas, gemstones, etc. that may possibly be found below the surface on the
        property. In order to build or develop on land, 75% of the mineral rights
        must
        be obtained. These state, county and various municipal requirements include
        the
        careful establishment of the identities of the owners of both surface and
        mineral rights to each piece of property. In many cases, this can often be
        a
        very complex matter because often the surface owner is not the same as the
        mineral rights owner and furthermore, mineral rights owners tend to be
        dispersed, having typically received these rights through such instruments
        and
        transactions as inheritance, legal settlements and judgments, etc. Adding
        complexity is the fact that mineral rights may also be, and oftentimes are,
        split among more than one party, and therefore a property may have multiple
        mineral rights owners, none of whom may make themselves readily
        known.
  -5-
 With
        identification of the proper mineral rights and surface rights owners so
        complex, we can offer our services as real estate consultants to those who
        have
        purchased a property without having done the proper due diligence first.
        We can
        help track down, through public records, the owners of both surface and mineral
        rights, as well as identify and sort out liens, easements, titles, deeds,
        taxes
        and any and all other issues related to the property. The inability to obtain
        such rights is a significant impediment to development in the central and
        coastal California. Most companies needing mineral rights waived cannot get
        the
        work done because they have no way of finding the mineral owners. We have
        the
        ability to find and contact these individuals through our knowledge of Town
        Hall
        records and intimate knowledge with the local geography and demography. We
        believe we can save time for companies by doing this research.
  After
        performing due diligence on the property, we can then offer our services
        as
        development consultants, using our expertise in helping the buyers of the
        property to prepare study maps and tract maps, and obtain the construction
        work
        necessary to grade the property and install infrastructure, including sewer
        and
        electric.
  In
        the
        case of b) above, where we approach an owner of undeveloped land and the
        owner
        refuses to sell to us, we will offer to enter into a joint venture with that
        owner, wherein the owner retains ownership of the undeveloped land – typically
        this is farmland – and we prepare the due diligence and help with preparing the
        infrastructure – as described above – as well as locate a buyer, all in exchange
        for half of the proceeds.
  This
        unique joint venture business model is essentially a profit-sharing agreement
        with the owner. Under this model, the profit sharing structure states what
        the
        raw undeveloped land is worth at that moment in time. Then we break out the
        costs to develop the land and what the land will be worth after the land
        has
        been developed.  Once those numbers have been figured we strike a deal
        with the client/landowner based on the profit of the developed land minus
        the
        undeveloped raw land.
  Formula:  (price
        per acre for developed land) – (price per acre for raw land) * 50%
  Example:  $100,000
        per acre for developed land - $40,000 per acre for raw land = $60,000
        per
  acre
        profit * 50% (Pebble Beach’s portion of the proceeds) = $30,000 in revenue for
        Pebble Beach per acre of land.
  This
        formula allows the client to maximize the amount of profit on their land,
        enticing them to go into joint-venture with us, despite them not wishing
        to sell
        us the land outright. This also minimizes the risk to us if the price of
        the
        land depreciates during the due diligence and development periods.
  Competition.                                
        Our competition is varied and disperse, ranging from individual real estate
        speculators to large homebuilders such as Richmond Homes, Castle and Cooke,
        and
        Paramount Homes. We believe our advantages over individual real estate
        speculators is our management team’s knowledge of the geography and demography
        of the area and our ability to close escrow faster because we are able to
        purchase an entire property without applying for a bank loan. We believe
        we are
        able to compete with the larger home builders because of our experience
        researching mineral rights which have proven to be a stumbling block for
        larger
        companies to understand, let alone sort out efficiently.
  Furthermore,
        to our knowledge, no competitor offers the joint venture profit sharing plan
        that we do to landowners reluctant to sell their land outright.
  The
        main
        competitive factors in our industry is price which you are willing to buy
        real
        estate, the price at which you are willing to sell, ability to close escrow
        quickly, obtaining mineral and all other rights efficiently, and knowledge
        of
        the area and ability to foresee areas in which real estate values are likely
        to
        rise.
  -6-
 Regulation.                      
        We are not a homebuilder, nor are we associated with any construction company;
        we therefore are not subject to the myriad state and municipal building codes
        and other construction-related regulations. As mentioned above, however,
        when we
        deal with undeveloped land, we must contend with mineral rights, surface
        rights,
        zoning laws, Environmental Impact Reports, which could include traffic, air
        quality and agricultural impact issues, as well as other issues related to
        General Plan Amendments administered by each municipality. We shall handle
        each
        of these regulatory factors in the manner described above, and have fully
        integrated the significant delays these regulatory issues will cause into
        our
        business model. Indeed, our facility in handling these regulatory matters
        serves
        as the basis for our third area of operation, consulting, as we describe
        above.
 
 Suppliers
        and
        Customers.                  We
        supply our own real estate prospects by scouring the region for available
        land
        and other property that fits our criteria. Construction companies are contacted
        when it is necessary to install infrastructure to undeveloped land. Some
        of the
        construction companies we use to develop infrastructure include mostly local
        companies such as Bradford and Sons Construction, Mike Atkinson Landscaping,
        Jaime Ramirez Concrete Works and Stan Quintos Finish Works.
 
 Our
        customers are developers and home builders, such as Lennar Homes, Beazer
        Homes
        and Ennis Homes. We will also be selling lots to various individual homebuilders
        like Bob Grujalva and James Bradford, and homebuyers such as the house we
        sold
        to local Bakersfield couple Harold and Leila Scott. It is a quirk of the
        industry that some of our competitors – such as homebuilders – are also our
        customers. This is due to the fact that homebuilders are always looking for
        land, and if we can purchase it before they can get to it, then we can re-sell
        it to them later.
  Research
        and
        Development.                  We
        spent no money on research and development in the last two years, relying
        instead on the experience of our management team, Aaron Hashim, Lesa Hashim,
        Jennifer Davis and Annette Davis, to make any amendments to our business
        or
        marketing plans.
 
 Employees.                      
        We have no formal employees. Instead, our four management personnel – Aaron
        Hashim, Lesa Hashim, Jennifer Davis and Annette Davis – each dedicate 7-21 hours
        per week to conduct the business and prepare all requisite administration,
        including this filing.
 
 Fourth
        area of operation
  Finally,
        we offer a document retrieval and filing service.  Under this model we
        are retrieving public record documents from companies that are usually located
        out of town for the purpose of pre employment screening.  We are
        usually contacted with a search request that gets completed in the same day.
        Our
        customers can be anyone from a pre employment screening firm to attorneys
        that
        are not from the area.
 
 Search
        fees are relatively inexpensive ranging from $5.00 up to $15.00. The idea
        is
        that we can get enough clients so that when we travel to the local courthouses
        to obtain these public documents we will be fulfilling multiple orders thus
        making it a profitable trip.  We can handle almost any public document
        request. Clients typically request criminal and civil searches along documents
        to be filed with the County Recorder.
 
 Competition.
        This is a highly competitive market but we expect that with our background
        in
        investigative and title services we will be able to compete in the market.
        We
        expect that this area of operation will take significant time to grow
        however.
  -7-
 Item
        1A. Risk factors
  Fluctuations
        in our operating results on a quarterly and annual basis could cause the
        market
        price of our common stock to decline.
  Our
        revenue and operating results have fluctuated significantly from period to
        period in the past and are likely to do so in the future. These fluctuations
        could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
  We
        may experience a decrease in market demand or a supply disruption due to
        uncertain economic conditions in the United States market, including as a
        result
        of the concerns of terrorism, war and social and political
        instability.
  Terrorist
        attacks in the United States and elsewhere, the continued presence of United
        States military forces in Iraq, and turmoil in the Middle East have contributed
        to the uncertainty in the United States and global economy and may lead to
        a
        decline in economic conditions, both domestically and
        internationally.
  Our
        ability to raise capital in the future may be limited and our failure to
        raise
        capital when needed could prevent us from executing our growth
        strategy.
  We
        believe that our existing cash will be sufficient for the next 12 months
        however
        there is no guarantee that in the future that we will be able to raise capital
        when needed.
  The
        Recent Slowdown in the Real Estate Market Is Affecting Our Real Estate
        Development Business
  This
        slowdown makes it very difficult if not impossible to pursue our real estate
        purchase, and our real estate development, prongs of our business plan. These
        portions of our business plan will not be feasible until the real estate
        market,
        at least in the Central Valley of California, bottoms out and prices begin
        to
        rise again, which may be a year or several years from now.
  Item
        2.  Description of Property
  Our
        principal office is a rented space in a dedicated office building at 1200
        Truxton Ave., Suite 130 in Bakersfield, California.
  Item
        3. Legal Proceedings
  We
        are
        not a party of any pending or existing legal proceedings, nor the subject
        of any
        governmental proceedings.
  Item
        4.  Submissions of Matters to a vote of Security holders.
  None
  Item
        5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder
        Matters
  The
        common stock is not currently trading
 -8-
  Part
        II
  Item
        6.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis
   SAFE
        HARBOR FOR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
  The
        following discussion and analysis contains certain statements that may be
        deemed
“forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of
        historical fact, that address events or developments that the we expect to
        occur, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements
        that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified
        by
        the words “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends”, “estimates”,
“projects”, “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions
“will”, “would”, “may”, “could” or “should” occur.
 
 Although
        we believe the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements
        are
        based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future
        performance and actual results may differ materially from those in the
        forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the actual results to
        differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include: failure
        to
        successfully negotiate or subsequently close such transactions, inability
        to
        obtain required shareholder or regulatory approvals, and general economic,
        market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements
        are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments
        may
        differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.
        Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions
        of
’management on the date the statements are made. We undertakes no obligation
        to
        update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs,
        estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.
 
 Liquidity
        and capital resources.   As of December 31, 2007 our cash on hand
        was $2,664. We anticipate our administrative and other non-real estate
        investment operational expenses over the next twelve months to be approximately
        $25,000, including approximately $10,000 in accounting and audit expenses.
        We
        arrive at a projected cash requirement of $25,000 over the next year based
        on
        the assumptions that a) we will continue to receive our office space rent-free;
        b) our expenses will be limited to administrative cost; and c) that our
        auditors’ costs will be relatively stable.
 
 Results
        of operations.  In 2007 we had two major revenue streams. The first
        was consulting work performed for various developers and builders in mapping
        there land for homes. We saw a dramatic decrease in 2007 compared to 2006
        in the
        amount of consulting work performed.  This was due in part to a
        declining real estate market.
  The
        second was the document recording service. We continued to see a steady increase
        in the amount of recording that were sent to us on a weekly basis and hope
        that
        this trend will continue into 2008.
  For
        the
        year we saw a decline in revenue from $ 21,607 in 2006 to $4,516 in 2007.
        The
        primary reason for the decline was due to the slowing market conditions in
        real
        estate combined with the companies shift in focus to do more document retrieval
        work.  By focusing on document retrieval it limits the company’s
        exposure in the real estate market from wild swings in price value fluctuations.
        We incurred general and administrative expenses of $38,762 primarily related
        to
        accounting fees and rent expense.
 
 -9-
 Marketing.                      
        With respect to finding property to purchase, we rely on direct marketing,
        which
        means we send out letters and make phone calls to property owners directly,
        inquiring if they are interested in selling their land. Members of our
        management team have even been known to find land that is prime for development,
        locate the land owner and knock on their door.
 
 In
        terms
        of finding buyers to which to sell our acquired property, our industry is
        such
        that our first and second areas of operation require no marketing, as real
        estate is in extreme demand and there are no shortage of buyers. We use brokers
        when necessary to locate the best buyers for our land.
 
 Our
        third
        area of operations, as it relates to consulting, should be marketed as soon
        as
        the real estate market turns around. Marketing activities that we intend
        to
        perform include attending farmers’ and builders’ conferences to market all our
        services.
 
 Advertising
        for all three areas of operations would involve research into the mailing
        addresses of our potential clients, printing costs for the promotional mailers,
        and postage costs. Costs for this activity are estimated at approximately
        $6-10,000 per mailing, and therefore an annual budget of $36-60,000 for
        advertising seems appropriate to us. However, we are not embarking on any
        advertising campaigns at this time. Our current strategy of slowly and
        methodically doing one transaction after another is working, and building
        us to
“self-sufficiency”, which we define as no longer needing Adavco’s help in
        purchasing property. We would only embark on an advertising campaign were
        we to
        a) become self-sufficient, b) be profitable and could afford this budget,
        and c)
        either have our current strategy fail us, requiring emergency advertising
        in
        order to drum up new business, or get to a point in our operations where
        we are
        ready to handle more transactions at the same time, which is likely to happen
        were we to begin advertising and if the real estate market were to turn
        around.
 
 Potential
        Future Business
        Models.                  In
        late December, 2007, Pebble Beach management began drawing up future plans
        for a
        record retrieval web portal, and incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary,
        Real
        Estate Record Retrieval Services Inc., to be the vehicle by which that business
        plan could be pursued.
 
 Shortly
        thereafter, in early January 2008, management decided to spin off Real Estate
        Record Retrieval Services Inc. Management felt that the web portal contemplated
        by the Record Retrieval business plan would include advertising and other
        marketing of, as well as other connections and partnerships with, businesses
        that may be in competition with Pebble Beach’s already-established manual record
        retrieval services, making it awkward for the Record Retrieval web portal
        business to be a subsidiary of the Pebble Beach established record retrieval
        business, with at least an appearance of a conflict of interest.
 
 On
        January 21, 2008 Pebble Beach's Board of Directors approved the realignment
        in
        the form of a spin-off transaction through a dividend issued to its shareholders
        on a pro rata basis.
 
 Later
        on
        January 21, 2008, the majority shareholders, representing 89.8% of the
        outstanding stock, voted to approve the Board of Directors' resolution to
        conduct this spin-off.
 
 In
        carrying out the realignment, Pebble Beach plans to distribute all of the
        shares
        of Real Estate Record common stock it owns to the holders of Pebble Beach's
        common stock on a pro rata basis. On January 21, 2008, the Pebble Beach Board
        of
        Directors approved the distribution of 42,400,000 shares of Real Estate Record
        Retrieval Services Inc. common stock, to holders of Pebble Beach common stock
        as
        of 5:00 p.m.. Eastern time on February 11, 2008 by means of a dividend as
        described in this Information Statement.
 
 After
        the
        spin-off, Pebble Beach will not own any shares of Real Estate Record common
        stock, and Real Estate Record will be fully independent, privately-owned
        companies.
 Item
        7.  Financial Statements
  -10-
  REPORT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  To
        the Board of Directors
 Pebble
        Beach Enterprises, Inc.
 Bakersfield,
        California
 
 We
        have
        audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pebble Beach
        Enterprises, Inc., as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated
        statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for
        the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of
        Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
        on
        these financial statements based on our audits.
  We
        conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
        Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
        we plan
        and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
        financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
        required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
        control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
        control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures
        that
        are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
        an
        opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
        reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit includes
        examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
        in
        the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
        principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
        evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
        our
        audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
  In
        our
        opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
        fairly,
        in all material respects, the financial position of Pebble Beach Enterprises,
        Inc., as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations
        and
        its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
        generally accepted in the United States of America.
  The
        accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
        that
        Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc. will continue as a going concern.  As
        discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, Pebble Beach
        Enterprises, Inc. suffered a net loss from operations and has an accumulated
        deficit, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
        a going
        concern.  Management’s plans regarding those matters also are
        described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any
        adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
  
  MALONE
        & BAILEY, PC
 www.malone-bailey.com
 Houston,
        Texas
 February
        19, 2008
  -11-
 
 PEBBLE
        BEACH ENTERPRISES, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED
        BALANCE SHEETS
 December
        31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
 12/31/07
                
                
                12/31/06ASSETSCash
                
                $
                2,664
                
                
                $
                13,837Accounts
                    receivable
                
                
                243
                
                
                
                288Prepaid
                    state taxes
                
                
                -
                
                
                
                368Total
                    current
                    assets
                
                $
                2,907
                
                
                $
                14,493LIABILITIES
                    & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)LIABILITIESAccrued
                    interest
                
                $
                286
                
                
                $
                -Accounts
                    payable
                
                
                604
                
                
                
                -Note
                    payable to related party
                
                
                15,000
                
                
                
                -Total
                    current liabilities
                
                
                15,890
                
                
                
                -STOCKHOLDERS’
                    EQUITY (DEFICIT)Common
                    stock, $.001 par value, 75,000,000 sharesauthorized,
                    42,400,000 and 40,000,000 sharesissued
                    and outstanding
                
                
                42,400
                
                
                
                40,000Additional
                    paid-in capital
                
                
                (15,297
                )
                
                
                (19,953
                )Accumulated
                    deficit
                
                
                (40,086
                )
                
                
                (5,554
                )TOTAL
                    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
                
                
                (12,983
                )
                
                
                14,493TOTAL
                    LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
                
                $
                2,907
                
                
                $
                14,493
 
 
 
 -12-
 
 PEBBLE
          BEACH ENTERPRISES, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 For
          the
          Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
 
 2007
                
                
                2006Revenue
                
                $
                4,516
                
                
                $
                21,607General
                    &Administrative
                    expenses
                
                
                38,762
                
                
                
                29,282Interest
                    expense
                
                
                286
                
                
                
                5Total
                    expenses
                
                
                (39,048
                )
                
                
                (29,287
                )Net
                    Loss
                
                $
                (34,532
                )
                
                $
                (7,680
                )Basic
                    and diluted netloss
                    per share
                
                $
                (0.00
                )
                
                $
                (0.00
                )Weighted
                    averageshares
                    outstanding
                
                
                40,789,401
                
                
                
                40,000,000
  
 -13-
 PEBBLE
          BEACH ENTERPRISES
 CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (DEFICIT)
 For
          the
          Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
 
 Additional
                
                
                
                
                
                TotalCommon
                    Stock
                
                
                Paid-in
                
                
                Accumulated
                
                
                Stockholders’Shares
                
                
                Amount
                
                
                Capital
                
                
                Deficit
                
                
                EquityBalance,
                    December 31, 2005
                
                
                40,000,000
                
                
                $
                40,000
                
                
                $
                (24,609
                )
                
                $
                2,126
                
                
                $
                17,517Contribution
                    of rent expense
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                4,656
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                4,656Net
                    loss
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                (7,680
                )
                
                
                (7,680
                )Balance,
                    December 31, 2006
                
                
                40,000,000
                
                
                
                40,000
                
                
                
                (19,953
                )
                
                
                (5,554
                )
                
                
                14,493Contribution
                    of rent expense
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                4,656
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                4,656Shares
                    issued for services
                
                
                2,400,000
                
                
                
                2,400
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                2,400Net
                    loss
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                
                (34,532
                )
                
                
                (34,532
                )Balance,
                    December 31, 2007
                
                
                42,400,000
                
                
                $
                42,400
                
                
                $
                (15,297
                )
                
                $
                (40,086
                )
                
                $
                (12,983
                )
 
  -14-
 PEBBLE
          BEACH ENTERPRISES, INC.
 CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 For
          the
          Years Ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
 
 
 2007
                
                
                2006CASH
                    FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet
                    loss
                
                $
                (34,532
                )
                
                $
                (7,680
                )Adjustments
                    to reconcile net lossto
                    cash used in operating
                    activities:Imputed
                    rent and interest
                    expense
                
                
                4,656
                
                
                
                4,656Stock
                    for services
                
                
                2,400
                
                
                
                -Changes
                    in:Accounts
                    Receivable
                
                
                45
                
                
                
                (288
                )Prepaid
                    and other current assets
                
                
                368
                
                
                
                (368
                )Accounts
                    Payable
                
                
                604Accrued expenses
                
                
                286
                
                
                
                (1,990
                )NET
                    CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                
                
                (26,173
                )
                
                
                (5,670
                )NET
                    FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds
                    from loan from related party
                
                
                15,000
                
                
                
                2,000Payments
                    on loan from related party
                
                
                -
                
                
                
                (2,000
                )NET
                    CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                
                
                15,000
                
                
                
                -NET
                    CHANGE IN CASH
                
                
                (11,173
                )
                
                
                (5,670
                )Cash
                    balance, beginning of the
                    period
                
                
                13,837
                
                
                
                19,507Cash
                    balance, ending of the period
                
                $
                2,664
                
                
                $
                13,837Supplemental
                    disclosures:Taxes
                    paid
                
                $
                -
                
                
                $
                -Interest
                    paid
                
                
                -
                
                
                
                -
 
 -15-
 PEBBLE
        BEACH ENTERPRISES
 NOTES
        TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  
 NOTE
        1 –  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 Nature
        of
        Business. Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc. (“Pebble Beach”) was incorporated in
        Nevada on July 30, 2004. Pebble Beach is engaged in buying and selling land
        and
        other real estate consulting.   In late December, 2007, Pebble
        Beach management incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Real Estate Record
        Retrieval Services Inc.  On January 21, 2008 Pebble Beach's Board of
        Directors approved a spin-off transaction through a dividend issued to its
        shareholders on a pro rata basis of Real Estate Retrieval Services,
        Inc.  whereby Pebble Beach distributed all of the shares of the
        subsidiary’s common stock it owns to the holders of Pebble Beach's common stock
        on a pro rata basis.  After the spin-off, Pebble Beach ceased owning
        any shares of the subsidiary’s common stock.  The subsidiary had no
        assets, liabilities or operations as of the spin-off date.
 
 Cash
        and
        Cash Equivalents. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, Pebble Beach
        considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity
        of
        three months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
 Use
        of
        Estimates. In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates
        and
        assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in
        the
        balance sheet and revenue and expenses in the statements of operations. Actual
        results could differ from those estimates.
 
 Revenue
        Recognition. Sales of real estate are recognized when and to the extent
        permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, “Accounting for
        Sales of Real Estate” (“SFAS No. 66”), as amended by SFAS No.
        144.  Until the requirements under SFAS No. 66 for full profit
        recognition have been met, transactions are accounted for using the deposit,
        the
        installment, the cost recovery, or the financing method, whichever is most
        appropriate for each transaction.  Through December 31, 2007, all
        sales were closed and funded simultaneously with no further obligation by
        Pebble
        Beach resulting in revenue recognition at the time of closing and
        funding.
 
 Income
        taxes. Pebble Beach recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based
        on
        differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
        liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be
        in
        effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. Pebble Beach provides
        a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider
        realization of such assets to be more likely than not.
 
 Basic
        and
        diluted net loss per share. Calculations are presented in accordance with
        Financial Accounting Standards Statement 128, and are calculated on the basis
        of
        the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
        They
        include the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents in years with net
        income. Basic and diluted loss per share is the same due to the absence of
        common stock equivalents.
 
 Recently
        issued accounting pronouncements. Pebble Beach does not expect the adoption
        of
        recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on
        Pebble
        Beach’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
 -16-
 
 NOTE
        2 – GOING CONCERN
 
 As
        shown
        in the accompanying financial statements, Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.
        incurred a net loss in fiscal 2007, has an accumulated deficit and negative
        working capital as of December 31, 2007.  These conditions raise
        substantial doubt as to Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.’s ability to continue as
        a going concern.  The financial statements do not include any
        adjustments that might be necessary if Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc. is
        unable
        to continue as a going concern.
 
 NOTE
        3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 On
        March
        3, 2006, Pebble Beach borrowed $2,000 from a related party. This note was
        unsecured and carried no interest rate. This note was primarily used in
        purchasing of Surface Waiver rights and was repaid on June 14, 2006. As of
        December 31, 2006 the note was repaid and there is no outstanding
        debt.
  On
        August
        14, 2007, Pebble Beach borrowed $15,000 from a related party. This note was
        unsecured and carried an interest rate of 5%. This note was primarily used
        for
        ongoing activities. As of December 31, 2007 the note has not been
        repaid.
 
 Pebble
        Beach is using office space provided by a related party on a rent-free, month
        to
        month basis. The fair value of the office space is $388 per month. Pebble
        Beach
        had $4,656 and $4,656 of rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2007
        and
        2006, respectively. The rent is contributed to capital by a related party
        as a
        credit to additional paid in capital.
  NOTE
        4 – INCOME TAXES
 
 Pebble
        Beach uses the liability method, where deferred tax assets and liabilities
        are
        determined based on the expected future tax consequences of temporary
        differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
        and income tax reporting purposes. During fiscal 2007 Pebble Beach incurred
        a
        net loss and, therefore, has no tax liability. The net deferred tax asset
        generated by the loss carry-forward has been fully reserved. The cumulative
        net
        operating loss carryforward is approximately $30,000 at December 31, 2007
        and
        2006, and will expire twenty years from when incurred.
 
 At
        December 31, 2007 and 2006, deferred tax assets consisted of the
        following:
  2007
                
                
                2006Deferred
                    tax assetsNet
                    operating losses
                
                $
                4,530
                
                
                $
                368Less:
                    valuation allowance
                
                
                4,530
                
                
                
                -Net
                    deferred tax asset
                
                $
                -
                
                
                $
                368
  NOTE
        6 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS
 
 All
        2007  and 2006 revenues were from  5 main
        customers.
 
 -17-
 NOTE
        7 – COMMON STOCK
 
 In
        2007,
        Pebble Beach issued 2,400,000 shares valued at $2,400 for consulting
        services.
 Item.
        8
        Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
        Disclosure.
 There
        have been no changes in or disagreements with our accountants.
  Item
        8A. Controls and Procedures
  It
        is
        Management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
        control over financial reporting for Pebble Beach Enterprises. It is the
        President’s ultimate responsibility to ensure the Company maintains disclosure
        controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that material
        information, both financial and non-financial, and other information required
        under the securities laws to be disclosed is identified and communicated
        to
        senior management on a timely basis. The Company’s disclosure controls and
        procedures include mandatory communication of material events, management
        review
        of monthly, quarterly and annual results and an established system of internal
        controls.
  As
        of
        December 31, 2007, management of the Company, including the President, conducted
        an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s
        disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated
        for
        use in this Quarterly Report. Based upon and as of the date of that evaluation,
        the President and Treasurer have concluded the Company’s disclosure controls
        were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required
        to be
        disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the relevant
        securities laws is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
        time
        periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. There have been no
        changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the
        period ended December 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably
        likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
        reporting.
  It
        should
        be noted that while the Company’s management, including
        the  President, believes the Company’s disclosure controls and
        procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance, they do not expect that
        the
        Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial
        reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter
        how
        well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
        the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
        system must reflect the fact there are resource constraints, and the benefits
        of
        controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
        limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
        absolute assurance all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have
        been
        detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments
        in
        decision-making can be faulty, and breakdowns can occur because of simple
        error
        or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
        acts of
        some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override
        of
        the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon
        certain
        assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
        any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
        future
        conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
        in
        conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
        deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
        system, misstatements due to errors or fraud may occur and not be
        detected.
  -18-
  Part
        III.
  Item
        9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance
        With
        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
  Annette
        Davis, 53, sole director – elected to directorship on July 26, 2004 to serve for
        one year; re-elected to directorship on July 26, 2005 for additional one-year
        term.
  Ms.
        Davis
        had been CFO of Bakersfield Produce & Distributing, in Bakersfield,
        California, from 1977 until its closure in May 2002. Bakersfield Produce
        had
        revenues exceeding $60,000,000 annually. She supervised its accounting
        department, reviewed balance sheets and income statements, approved capital
        expenditures, coordinated with CPAs for audit and tax filings purposes, and
        negotiated contracts with legal departments. Ms. Davis was responsible for
        this
        corporation’s fiscal aspects.
  Ms.
        Davis
        has also served as Controller of Andes River Company, LLC, in Bakersfield,
        California, from 1999 until it ceased operations in December of 2003. She
        held
        the fiscal responsibilities of this company, which imported produce from
        the
        South American country of Chile, with revenues of $40 million annually. Ms.
        Davis was responsible for its income and balance sheets, accounting department,
        approved all expenditures and outside business, established credit lines
        for the
        company, and coordinated with CPAs for tax returns in three states.
  Ms.
        Davis
        also controls and is currently President of Adavco, Inc., which is a company,
        as
        we described earlier, which loans money to us as needed to purchase property,
        which we then sell for a profit at a later time. Adavco’s main line of business
        is a real estate development company, and it has constructed apartment buildings
        and custom homes, among other development projects, since its founding in
        1982.
  From
        1999-2004, Ms. Davis was also Treasurer of Fresh Veg Broker.com, Inc., our
        former parent company whose business plan, which never was successful, was
        to
        create a website where buyers and sellers of produce could do deals with
        each
        other online.
  Aaron
        Hashim, 28, president – elected to office on July 26, 2004 to serve for one
        year; re-elected to office on July 26, 2005 for additional one-year
        term.
  Mr.
        Hashim was a member of Public Data Search from 1998 to 2002, where he performed
        background checks of applicants to various government and private sector
        job
        across various industries, as well as conducted public records searches
        regarding property rights, probate issues and title records.
  Mr.
        Hashim served as a member of US Claim Services, LLC, a company specializing
        in
        accessing public records to locate people and sort out property and probate
        issues, from 2002 to 2004. In this capacity, Mr. Hashim was responsible for
        adding several government agencies - seeking to locate delinquent tax payers
        -
        to the company’s client list, which he did, improving the company’s revenues by
        over $200,000 annually. Mr. Hashim was also responsible for the work of 15
        others.
  Finally,
        from 2004 to present, Mr. Hashim has been a member of IBG, Inc., an Internet
        start-up company which removes people from pre-approved credit card offer
        rolls.
  -19-
 Jennifer
        Davis, 26, secretary – elected to office on July 26, 2004 to serve for one year;
        re-elected to office on July 26, 2005 for additional one-year term.
  From
        2001
        - 2004, Ms. Davis worked for Bearing Point, a division of KPMG Consulting,
        first
        as a management analyst and then as a senior management analyst for the
        Department of Defense, wherein she provided day-to-day financial reporting
        assistance and management support to the business manager of Space and Naval
        Warfare regarding the Navy Marine Corp Intranet; provided guidance and oversight
        on proper allocation of funding as part of the DoD’s overall annual budget based
        upon project environment and needs;ility and trust with client and colleagues;
        streamlined and enhanced web-based tools; performed project management, use
        case
        development and requirements management analyses; and managed the project
        schedule, requirements identification, test script creation, systems integration
        testing, user training and end user support for web-based
        applications.
  Currently,
        and since 2004, Ms. Davis has been a member of IBG, Inc., an Internet start-up
        company which removes people from pre-approved credit card offer
        rolls.
  Lesa
        Hashim, 29, vice-president and treasurer – elected to both offices on July 26,
        2004 to serve for one year; re-elected to both offices on July 26, 2005 for
        additional one-year term.
  From
        1999-2001, Ms. Hashim served as advertising manager for Brill Media in New
        York
        City, in which capacity she was responsible for completion of advertising
        sales
        business reports, including all financial and forecast reports.
  From
        2001-2004, Ms. Hashim was a member and Chief Operating Officer of U.S. Claim
        Services, LLC, a company specializing in accessing public records to locate
        people and sort out property and probate issues, wherein Ms. Hashim served
        as
        Acting Director of Human Resources and Acting Controller, responsible for
        the
        creation and analysis of all budget and financial planning reports, daily
        bookkeeping, payroll and tax preparation.
  Finally,
        from 2004 to present, Ms. Hashim has been a member of IBG, Inc., an Internet
        start-up company which removes people from pre-approved credit card offer
        rolls.
  Annette
        Davis, our sole Director, is the mother of Jennifer Davis, our Secretary.
        Annette Davis is also the aunt of Lesa Hashim and Aaron Hashim, who are brother
        and sister and first cousins to Jennifer Davis.
  Neither
        our director nor any executives of Pebble Beach, nor any promoter or control
        person, was involved in any bankruptcy or insolvency action, nor was involved
        in
        any business which was involved in any such action at or within 2 years before
        the time of such filing, nor any criminal proceeding nor found to be in
        violation of any securities or futures laws or regulations nor has been barred
        or otherwise enjoined from participating in any type of business, securities
        or
        banking activities.
  We
        do not
        have an audit committee financial expert serving on our audit committee, due to
        our relatively light revenues and operations and unreasonable expense an
        audit
        committee financial expert would pose for our business.
  -20-
  Item
        10. Executive Compensation
  None
        of
        the officers or directors of Pebble Beach is compensated nor has received
        any
        compensation, including any options or stock appreciation rights.
  We
        have
        no employee contracts of any kind.
  Item
        11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
  We
        have
        only one class of securities – our Common Stock.
  The
        following represents the security ownership of the only person who owns more
        than five percent of our outstanding Common Stock:
 Annette
                    Davis
                38,054,331
                    shares1
                95.1%
                    of classc/o
                    Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.
                Direct
                    ownership1200
                    Truxton Avenue  #130Bakersfield,
                    CA  93301The
                    following represents the security ownership of all members of
                    management:Annette
                    Davis
                38,054,331
                    shares2
                95.1%
                    of classDirector
                Direct
                    ownershipc/o
                    Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.1200
                    Truxton Avenue  #130Bakersfield,
                    CA  93301Aaron
                    Hashim
                0
                    shares3
                0%
                    of classPresidentc/o
                    Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.1200
                    Truxton Avenue  #130Bakersfield,
                    CA  93301Lesa
                    Hashim
                0
                    shares4
                0%
                    of classVice-President
                    and Treasurerc/o
                    Pebble Beach Enterprises, Inc.1200
                    Truxton Avenue  #130Bakersfield,
                    CA  93301Jennifer
                    Davis
                0
                    shares5
                0%
                    of class
 
 1
            There
            are no shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire
            within
            sixty days, from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege or similar
            obligations or instruments.
 2
            There
            are no shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire
            within
            sixty days, from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege or similar
            obligations or instruments.
 3
            There
            are no shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire
            within
            sixty days, from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege or similar
            obligations or instruments.
 4
            There
            are no shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire
            within
            sixty days, from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege or similar
            obligations or instruments.
 5
            There
            are no shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire
            within
            sixty days, from options, warrants, rights, conversion privilege or similar
            obligations or instruments.
  -21-
 Item
        12.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
  On
        August
        14, 2007, Pebble Beach borrowed $15,000 from a related party. This note was
        unsecured and carried a 5% interest rate. This note was primarily used for
        ongoing business activity.
  Pebble
        Beach is using office space provided by a related party on a rent-free, month
        to
        month basis. The fair value of the office space is $388 per month. Pebble
        Beach
        had $4,656 and $4,656 of rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2007
        and
        2006, respectively. The rent is contributed to capital by a related party
        as a
        credit to additional paid in capital.
  Item
        13.  Index to exhibits
  Index
        No.                      
Description
 
 
 2(a)                      
        Articles of Incorporation*
 
 2(b)                      
        Bylaws*
 
 Exhibit
                  14
              Item
                  601(b)(14)
              Code
                  of ethics (attached)
 
 Exhibit
                  31.1 and 31.2
              Item
                  601(b)(31)
              Rule
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications(attached)Exhibit
                  32.1 and 32.2
              Item
                  601(b)(32)
              Section
                  1350 (attached)
 
 ·
              Incorporated
                  by reference to or Form 10-SB filing on February 1, 2006. File
                  No.
                  0-51770.
 
 There
        are
        no management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to
        be
        filed as an exhibit to this form.
  Item.
        14 Principle Accountant Fees and Services
  Audit
        Fees
  Aggregate
        fees billed for fiscal year 2007 and 2006 for professional services rendered
        by
        the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements,
        review of quarterly statements and other services provided in connection
        with
        statutory or regulatory filings or engagements:
        $16,000         and
        $17,484
  -22-
 Audit-Related
        Fees
  Aggregate
        fees billed in fiscal year 2007 and 2006 for assurance and related services
        by
        the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of
        the
        audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under the
        “Audit Fees” caption above: $0 for both years.
  Tax
        Fees
  Aggregate
        fees billed in fiscal year 2007 and 2006 for professional services rendered
        by
        the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning:
        $0 for
        both years.
  All
        Other Fees
  Aggregate
        fees billed in fiscal year 2007 and 2006 for products and services provided
        by
        the principal accountant, other than the services reported above: $0 for
        both
        years.
  Pebble
        Beach’s audit committee’s pre-approval policy is to retain the services of a
        professional accountant only once. The threshold established by Rule 2-01
        of
        Regulation S-X has been met.
  The
        audit
        committee’s pre-approval procedure is to carefully establish that each of the
        tests delineated in paragraphs (b) and (c)(1)-(3) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation
        S-X
        are met
  -23-
 SIGNATURES
  In
        accordance with Section 13 of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
        report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
        authorized.
   PEBBLE
        BEACH ENTERPRISES, INC.
  By:           
        /s/ Annette Davis
 Annette
        Davis Director
 
 February  19,
        2008
 
 In
        accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
        following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
        the
        dates indicated.
  By:           
        /s/ H. Annette Davis
 Annette
        Davis, Director
 
 
 February
        19, 2008
 
 
 By:           
        /s/ Lesa Hashim
 Lesa
        Hashim, Treasurer,
        Controller
 
 
 February
        19, 2008
 
 -24-