alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Compex Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report),
I, Dan W. Gladney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott
Youngstrom, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Dan W. GladneyDan W. Gladney
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003/s/ Scott P. YoungstromScott P. Youngstrom
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1213 

To repeal mandatory funding provided to States in the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act to establish American Health Benefit Exchanges. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To repeal mandatory funding provided to States in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to establish 

American Health Benefit Exchanges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEALING MANDATORY FUNDING TO STATES 

4 TO ESTABLISH AMERICAN HEALTH BENEFIT 

5 EXCHANGES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1311(a) of the Patient 

7 Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 13031(a)) 

8 is repealed. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1213 IH

1 (b) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

2 funds made available under such section 1311(a), the un3 obligated balance is rescinded. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Connecticut Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 99.0   | 99.0   | 98.7   | 98.6   | 98.8   | 98.5   | 98.2   | 97.7   | 97.5  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 97.3   | 96.8   | 96.7   | 95.3   | 95.9   | 96.3   | 96.2   | 96.2   | 96.3   | 96.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 96.2   | 96.3   | 96.5   | 96.7   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6479.

#### Samonte *v.*Hawaii.

Int. Ct. App. Haw. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### COM. v. DURHAM, G.

1705 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/03/2017

CP-04-CR-0001860-2007

(Beaver)

Affirmed
Exhibit 10.10


CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT


CyberOptics Corporation, a Minnesota
Corporation (the “Company”) and Daniel Good (“Executive”) have previously entered into a Severance Pay
Agreement dated May 1, 2010 (the “Agreement”) and wish to clarify the definition of “termination of employment”
for all purposes of such agreement. Accordingly, the Company and Executive agree that, for all purposes of the Agreement, “termination”
or “termination of employment” shall mean a “separation from service” as that term is defined in Section
409A of the internal revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder.


The Company and Executive have executed this
Clarification Agreement, as of December 31, 2011.


 


	CyberOptics Corporation	 	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By 	/s/ Kathleen P. Iverson	 	/s/ Daniel Good	 
	 	Its 	Chief Executive Officer	 	Daniel Good
438P16

#### State v. Darryl A. McPhaul

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of N.C. Court of Appeals (COA16-799)

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Allowed

3. Dismissed as moot
LAW OFFICES 

GAROFALO GOERLICH HAINBACH PC 

1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE NW SUITE 590 

WASHINGTON DC 20036-6802 

 

AARON A. GOERLICH TELEPHONE 202 776-3970

DIRECT DIAL 202 776-3974 FACSIMILE 202 776-3975

AGOERLICH@GGH-AIRLAW.COM WWW.GGH-AIRLAW.COM

February 3, 2014

Ms. Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing Branch

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Southern Air Inc. (Docket DOT-OST-2014-0014)

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This is to notify the Department that polling of all carriers served with the referenced 

application has been completed. All carriers expressed no objection to the application.

In view of the planned February 13 start-up date for the codeshare service, Southern Air 

would be grateful if the requested Statement of Authorization could be issued at the 

Department’s earliest convenience.

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Aaron A. Goerlich

Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC

Counsel for Southern Air Inc.

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2014-0014
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury General Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 5, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ THEODORE STALICK
|                  |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 147 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 147

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That pursuant to the last sentence of section 106 of title 1, United 
States Code, the requirement of section 107 of such title that the 
enrollment of any bill or joint resolution be printed on parchment is 
waived for the duration of the One Hundred Twelfth Congress, and the 
enrollment of any such bill or joint

              

 resolution shall be in such form as may be certified by the Clerk of 
the House of Representatives or the Secretary of the Senate (as 
applicable) to be a truly enrolled bill or joint resolution (as the 
case may be).

            Passed the House of Representatives January 1, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 147

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Waiving the requirement that measures enrolled during the remainder of 
       the One Hundred Twelfth Congress be printed on parchment.
```
#### COM. v. GAINES, D.

196 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/28/2017

CP-26-CR-0001197-2016 (Fayette)

Affirmed
P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

N HOUSTON

vX

,-,

/.

nn i --; <"

STATE

OFFICIA^BUSmESS

OfttefAS

PRIVATE

PENALTYFQR

USE O.U.

°8

EUGENEDALE

RE: WR-82,683-01

ENDERLIN JR.

"* •;D.CJL14SJ05L97

^§1 s^hs! ^ ^Pfa/'

/%

•saBCnSTEES' P1TNEV RO

02 1M * 

.0004279596 APR01 

MAILED FROM ZIPCODE 

b\SC*A fl&z

m
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Georgia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Georgia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        |        |        |        |        |        | 60     | 98,673
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100,696 | 100,693 | 98,131 | 97,783 | 96,816 | 96,259 | 94,391 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92,441  | 91,292  | 89,488 | 89,504 | 90,728 | 91,457 | 91,999 | 91,783 | 92,905 | 93,702
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 93,084  | 93,744  | 92,967 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 75, 830

EX PA R TE M I C H A EL JYR O D LO W R Y , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 1 6 2 0 2 - B I N T HE 1 0 4 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM TAYLO R CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u a n t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this a pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applica nt was convic ted of possession of a
c on tr oll e d s ub sta

nc e a nd se nte nc e d to tw e nty y e a rs ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Th e El e ve nth Court of Ap pe a ls dismiss ed his appe al. Lowr yv . S tat e , No. 11-07-00147- CR (Tex. App.–Eastland, delivere d J une 28, 2007, no pet.). Applicant conte nds that he was denied his r ight to an a ppeal. We remande d this application to the trial court for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. The trial court r ecommende d that weg rant Ap p l i ca n t an out-of-time appea l. We find, theref ore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to f

ile an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Ca use No. 16202-B from the 104 J udicial District C ourt of Taylor County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which th he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a meaning fu l appeal. All time lim its shall be calculated as if the se ntence had bee n imposed on the date on wh ic h th e mand a te of thi s Cour t issu e s. We hol d th a t, s ho uld Ap pli c a nt d e sir e to p ro se c ute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a w ritten notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 da y s a ft e r t he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: Fe bruar

y 6, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### COM. v. BOLUS, R.

1300 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

CP-35-CR-0001602-2011

(Lackawanna)

Affirmed
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 3, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas W. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas W. Dougherty
---------------------------
Douglas W. Dougherty
Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDUSA
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES' STATEMENT ON INCOME AND BALANCE SHEET AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    39381
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1761
<INVENTORY>                                      36260
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 89500
<PP&E>                                          437287
<DEPRECIATION>                                  262519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  323775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            53088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      191445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    323775
<SALES>                                          69079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 69079
<CGS>                                            49405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    64699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (161)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3897
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2634
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |         |         |        | 9,360  | 20,233 | -5,518
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6,306  | 4,522  | 13,789 | 2,476  | 8,297   | -10,828 | 11,267 | 9,652  | 27,220 | 36,866
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 13,769 | 25,613 | 23,632 | 18,599 | -13,309 | 22,514  | 20,480 | 22,178 | 40,580 | 32,675
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 28,876 | 28,489 | 13,844 |        |         |         |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### DAVID v. KENDRICK et al.

No. 10194.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 10, 1950.

Decided April 24, 1950.

Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. George C. Gertman, Washington, D. C., with -whom Mr. C. Clinton Janies, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURTAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendants in a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell real estate. The plaintiff bases his claim on the following memorandum which the defendants signed:

> "Aug. 3, 1945.

> “Received of E. M. David Twelve Hundred Fifty & 00/000 Dollars as deposit on

> sale of property at 1451 Pa. Ave. S. E. D. C.

> “$1,250.00 Harry T. Kendrick

> “Purchase price $12,750.00 balance due $11,500.00.

> Leona Kendrick”

The court found in substance that the defendants had no intention of binding themselves to sell, that the plaintiff knew this, and that the plaintiff induced the defendants to sign the memorandum by telling them he would return it to them and take back his deposit if they asked him to do so. The plaintiff did not deny making this representation. Since the plaintiff knew that the defendants intended the memorandum to have no legal effect and the plaintiff gave the defendants to understand that he also intended it to have no legal effect, it has none. The court understated the matter in describing plaintiff’s conduct as “overreaching”.

Affirmed.
#### State v. Williams

110,008

08/04/2015

Denied

Unpublished