alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 39,173 | 32,532 | 36,597
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 38,486 | 33,013 | 37,143 | 33,556 | 28,989 | 30,669 | 27,406 | 34,849 | 37,223 | 41,417
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 47,470 | 51,220 | 37,176 | 37,825 | 42,093 | 43,059 | 40,299 | 42,780 | 45,241 | 49,008
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 46,028 | 51,630 | 54,723 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-201-000]


Gulf States Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 5, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 1, 1998, Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (Gulf States), tendered for filing the original and revised 
tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the filing. Gulf States proposes 
that the foregoing tariff sheets be made effective on June 1, 1998.
    Gulf States states that this filing is in compliance with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order on Requests for Waiver, 
issued in Docket No. RP97-174-001, on April 30, 1997. Gulf States 
Transmission Corporation, et al., 79 FERC para. 61,102 (1997). Gulf 
States further states that the tariff sheets implement the standards 
for Electronic Data Interchange/Electronic Data Mechanism and capacity 
release promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board and adopted by 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Order Nos. 587, et al.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 384.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12367 Filed 5-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT  TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report"), I, Gary Gatchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



Date:
March 12, 2009

/s/ GARY GATCHELL Gary Gatchell Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Maryland Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Maryland Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |         |        |        | -38,304 | 9,617   | -11,066
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -7,052 | -4,889 | -16,526 | 18,619 | -10,518 | 6,790  | -9,919 | -1,817  | -7,046  | 1,918  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -8,026 | 4,117  | 15,210  | 22,403 | 40,375  | 47,094 | 5,702  | 4,297   | -11,023 | 1,894  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -1,582 | -4,710 | 8,743   |        |         |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
CERTIFICATION
Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-CB1

I, Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP,
certify that:
1.
I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Securitized Asset BackedReceivables LLC Trust 2006-CB1 (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");
2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
4.
I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my
knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement in all material respects; and
5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York (custodian) and  U.S. Bank National Association(trustee).
Date:
March 30, 2007
/s/: Elizabeth Folk____________________Elizabeth FolkSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(senior officer in charge of the servicingfunction of the servicer)
Exhibit 31
#### COM. v. ECHEVAVIA, H.

3001 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0013153-2015

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### Randy ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1277

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 28, 2017

Rehearing Denied January 17, 2018

Randy Anderson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion asserting that his 25-year minimum-mandatory sentence, imposed for a conviction of trafficking in between 28 grams and 30 kilograms of hydrocodone, section 893.135(l)(c)l.c., Florida Statutes (2014), is illegal. Appellant argues that in 2014 the Florida Legislature passed chapter 14-176, section 1, Laws of Florida, which reduced the minimum-mandatory sentence for. trafficking in this amount of hydrocodone. Chapter 14-176, section 1, became effective on July 1, 2014, and did in fact reduce the minimum-mandatory sentence applicable to the amount of hydrocodone charged against Appellant from 25 years to 7 years. But the State charged Appellant with committing this offense on May 28, 2014, before the effective date of the statute reducing the applicable minimum-mandatory term, and the sentence to be imposed must conform to the statute in effect at the time a defendant commits his offense. *See generally Davis v. State,*892 So.2d 518, 519-20 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (discussing that Article X, section 9, of the Florida Constitution states that “jrjepeal or amendment of a criminal statute shall not affect prosecution or punishment for any crime previously committed”). Appellant’s -25-year minimum-mandatory sentence is therefore legal.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Sherwood, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Sherwood, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | NA      | NA     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,249  | 494,795 | 453,093 | 435,199 | 458,675 | 491,481 | 511,488 | 465,939 | 490,024 | 479,741
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 476,855 | 448,967 | 433,713 | 432,497 | 433,227 | 419,749 | 493,099 | 489,738 | 486,921 | 460,972
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 383,479 | 443,543 | 486,065 | 462,145 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-4091



#  D ORIAN J ORDAN , a/k/a K.K., a/k/a Kevin, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge.

(CR-01-25) Submitted: May 12, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, John J. Frail, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Dorian Jordan appeals his twelve-month sentence imposed by the district court following his violation of the terms of his supervised release. In a brief filed pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jordan’s attorney challenges the length of Jordan’s revocationsentence. Jordan was apprised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. We affirm. We have thoroughly reviewed the record on appeal, including the nature and extent of Jordan’s violations of his supervised release and the transcript of the revocation hearing. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Jordan’s supervised release based on his admissions at the revocation hearing. See United States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642-43 (4th Cir. 1995). Because the district court was presented with and explicitly considered the suggested sentencing range of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4 (2002), and the statutory maximum sentence of 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (2000), we find no error in Jordan’s sentence. Id. at 642-43. As required by Anders , we have examined the entire record andfind no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Jordan’s sentence. Further, this court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous,then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. J ORDAN
#### J. Howard McGRATH, Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CHASE NATIONAL BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK, and John J. McCloskey, Jr., as Sheriff, of the City of New York, and Leo Zittman and John F. McCarthy, Respondents-Appellants. J. Howard McGRATH, Attorney General, as successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Petitioner-Appellee, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, and John J. McCloskey, Jr., as Sheriff of the City of New York, and Leo Zittman and John F. McCarthy, Respondents-Appellants.

Nos. 207, 208, Docket 21620 and 21621.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 9, 1950.

Decided June 2, 1950.

Joseph M. Cohen, New York City, for appellant Zittman.

Katz & Sommerich, New York City, Henry I. Fillman and Otto C. Sommerich, New York City, of counsel, for appellant McCarthy.

Sidney Posner, New York City, for appellant McCloskey.

Harold I. Baynton, Acting Director, Office of Alien Property, Washington, D. C., Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City, James L. Morrisson and Ralph S. Spritzer, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City, for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decrees of the District Court, 82 F.Supp. 740, affirmed as to appellants Zittman and McCarthy on the authority of Propper v. Clark, 337 U.S. 472, 69 S.Ct. 1333, 93 L.Ed. 1480, and as to appellant Sheriff of the City of New York on the ground stated in the opinion below.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Indiana Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Indiana Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,107  | 1,966  | 4,352  | 785    | 2,714  | 923    | 777    | 806    | 6,321  | 737   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,027  | 1,517  | 849    | 2,320  | 2,638  | 1,316  | 4,337  | 2,520  | 1,589  | 2,000 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 795    | 1,477  | 1,726  | 2,197  | 1,602  | 831    | 1,447  | 2,663  | 982    | 691   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,983  | 609    | 0      | 925    | 2,193  | 1,035  | 1,038  | 608    | 744    | 858   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 670    | 963    | 302    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024