alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1108 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1108

        For the relief of Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        For the relief of Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF FRANCISCO RIVERA AND ALFONSO CALDERON.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds 
not otherwise appropriated, an appropriate amount to compensate 
Francisco Rivera and Alfonso Calderon for costs related to and damages 
arising from their arrest, prosecution, and incarceration in Mexico as 
described in Claim No. 05-608C filed in the United States Court of 
Federal Claims.
    (b) Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment under subsection (a) shall 
be in full satisfaction of all claims of Francisco Rivera and Alfonso 
Calderon against the United States in connection with the matter 
described in such subsection.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 
percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or 
received by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment under this Act.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be fined under title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Del Rio, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Del Rio, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 282    | 346    | 323   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 320    | 282    | 355    | 372    | 324    | 306    | 356    | 357    | 377    | 422   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 404    | 417    | 462    | 674    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1




Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated (the
“Company”) for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peng K.
Lim, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C.
Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and(2)
            
            The
      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
  Company.








May 17, 2010
            /S/ PENG K.
    LIMPeng K. LimChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




---
,Laads.„ 

Hardesty 

, J. 

Douglas 

Ch$24 

Cherry 

Petitioner has failed to include the challenged order of the 

district court. NRAP 21(a)(4). Without that basis, the writ petition does 

not show that the law clearly compels a writ in petitioner's favor, and 

petitioner has not shown that relief is warranted. Int'l Game Tech., 124 

Nev. at 197, 179 P.3d at 558; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Thus, 

we conclude that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not 

warranted. NRAP 21(b); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge 

Law Offices of Kenneth E. Goates 

Law Office of William R. Brenske 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(01 1947A e
*

The HONORABLE DANIEL M. FRIEDMAN, United States Circuit

Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

 1The HONORABLE PAUL A. MAGNUSON, Chief Judge of the United

States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 96-1193

___________

Bernice L. Dalbec, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota.

Electronic Data Systems Corp., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant-Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 18, 1996

 Filed: December 27, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, FRIEDMAN,* and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In May 1993, Electronic Data Systems Corporation terminated

Bernice L. Dalbec as EDS's computer Operations Supervisor at its

Plymouth, Minnesota, site. Dalbec commenced this action in state

court alleging gender and age discrimination in violation of the

Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 363.01 et seq., and EDS

removed the action to federal court. Following extensive

discovery, the district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of

EDS, and Dalbec appeals. 
-2-

The district court found undisputed evidence that Dalbec was

terminated as part of a bona fide corporate-wide reduction in

force, even though hers was the only position eliminated at the

Plymouth site. Applying the Minnesota Supreme Court's standards

for reduction-in-force cases, see Dietrich v. Canadian Pac. Ltd.,

536 N.W.2d 319, 324-25 (Minn. 1995), the court concluded that

Dalbec has not made the "additional showing" required to establish

a prima facie case of employment discrimination in such cases, and

alternatively that Dalbec has failed to present evidence which, if

believed, would establish that EDS's profferred nondiscriminatory

reason for termination -- that it selected Dalbec for inclusion in

the reduction in force because of her on-going job performance

problems -- was a pretext for gender or age discrimination.

On appeal, Dalbec argues that the district court improperly

granted summary judgment by ignoring Dalbec's evidence of pretext,

particularly her favorable performance reviews and other evidence

she was qualified for the position; by improperly crediting

evidence of her performance problems and insubordination that was

not part of her personnel file; and by concluding that the

reduction in force was bona fide despite evidence that, at least as

applied to Dalbec, it was pretextual. After careful review of the

record and the parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that summary

judgment was properly granted in favor of EDS for the reasons

stated in the district court's thorough Memorandum and Order dated

December 15, 1995. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

EDS's motions to strike portions of the joint appendix and

Dalbec's reply brief are denied.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 35.1







Annual Statement of Compliance
 TILES Trust No. 2006-1
 
 VIA: EMAIL
 
 MS Structured Asset Corp.
 1585 Broadway
 New York, New York 10036
 
 Reference is made to the Trust Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, for TILES Trust No. 2006-1, dated February 15, 2006, together with Schedules I, II and III attached thereto, and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee dated March 5, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings defined in the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements.
 
 I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 1.  A review of the  activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
 
 2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof.
 
 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
 
 
 
 
 Date: 3/13/2013
 
 U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 
 /s/  Kimberly O. Jacobs
 Kimberly O. Jacobs
 Senior Vice President
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Kentucky Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Kentucky Natural Gas Percentage Total Industrial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.95   | 1.02   | 1.06   | 1.07   | 1.13   | 1.12   | 1.22  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.24   | 1.29   | 1.37   | 1.43   | 1.58   | 1.70   | 1.66   | 1.64   | 1.59   | 1.51  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.49   | 1.48   | 1.46   | 1.48   | 1.53   | 1.55   | 1.49   | 1.43   | 1.40   | 1.45  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.42   | 1.47   | 1.51   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
133P17

#### State v. Michael Todd Walker

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-109)

2. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

1. Denied

2. Dismissed as moot
ACCEPTED 06-14-00098-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/16/2015 4:50:21 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
ex10-7.htm


EXHIBIT 10.7


 


Compensation Arrangements with Thomas J. Flournoy







Neither Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. (“Company”), nor First Bank of Georgia (“Bank”), has a written employment agreement with Thomas J. Flournoy, Chief Financial Officer of Georgia-Carolina Bancshares, Inc. and First Bank of Georgia.  Mr. Flournoy’s current (2012) salary is $175,000 and Mr. Flournoy is eligible for an annual incentive award under the Bank’s Annual Incentive Plan, pursuant to which he received $53,920 for his performance in 2011.  See Exhibit 10.9 for a description of Mr. Flournoy’s Annual Incentive Plan.  Mr. Flournoy is eligible for stock option grants under the Company’s option plans as determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company.  In addition, Mr. Flournoy participates in the Bank’s medical, dental, life and disability insurance plans and he may participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan.







Mr. Flournoy entered into a Severance Protection Agreement with the Bank, which entitles him to certain payments following a change in control of the Company.  The Severance Protection Agreement was filed with the Company’s 8-K filing on June 26, 2009.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Freight Connection Incorporated, 324 Garden Road, Springfield, PA 
19064, Officers: Angela Wilson, President, Francis Wilson, Vice 
President.
Millennium Shipping Company, 4100 East 51st Street, Suite 104, Tulsa, 
OK 74135, Officers: Steven C. Reynolds, President, Charles L. Harmon, 
Vice President.
Express Air Cargo, Inc., 5242\1/2\ W. 104th Street, Los Angeles, CA 
90045, Officers: Tom Aoyagi, President, Karen Aoyagi, Secretary/
Treasurer.
AG World Transport, Inc. d/b/a Air & Ground World Transport, 402 
Grandview Drive, South San Francisco, CA 94080, Officers: Edwin Chow, 
President, Gregory McLaughlin, Vice President.
Trans-Ocean International, Inc., 150 North Santa Anita Avenue, Suite 
#580, Arcadia, CA 91006, Officer: Ying Diao, President.
Cypress Cargo, Corp., 2740 W. 63 Street, #205m Hialeah, FL 33016, 
Officers: Ana R. Saavedra, President, Eric Gonzalez, Vice President.
Global Logistics International Inc., 1207 N.W., 93rd Ct., Miami, FL 
33172, Officers: Evelyn A. Damian, President, Guillermo Damian, Vice 
President.
Tur Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Seven Winds Shipping, 8443 N.W., 68th 
Street, Miami, FL 33166, Officers: Miriam Z. Tur, President, Miriam Tur 
Ruenes, Vice President.

    Dated: May 4, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12115 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Massachusetts Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Massachusetts Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 7,885  | 15,234 | 14,021 | 6,599  | 9,844  | 9,261  | 6,184  | 5,732  | 5,782  | 10,004
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6,586  | 4,399  | 5,147  | 5,531  | 5,550  | 5,898  | 6,107  | 5,049  | 2,712  | 3,934 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,480  | 6,382  | 5,683  | 10,035 | 9,485  | 7,643  | 5,966  | 10,006 | 5,863  | 7,244 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,507  | 7,558  | 3,805  | 8,339  | 10,621 | 9,311  | 6,125  | 5,873  | 6,693  | 4,906 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,405  | 4,757  | 6,260  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.24   | 0.30   | 0.27   | 0.13   | 0.10   | 0.13   | 0.13  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.20   | 0.28   | 0.27   | 0.28   | 0.17   | 0.21   | 0.47   | 0.82   | 0.83   | 0.73  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.66   | 0.53   | 0.52   | 0.61   | 0.72   | 0.59   | 0.60   | 0.44   | 0.58   | 0.60  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.58   | 0.68   | 0.66   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024