alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1082 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1082

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to provide a registration 
  exemption for private equity fund advisers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2011

 Mr. Hurt (for himself and Mr. Cooper) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to provide a registration 
  exemption for private equity fund advisers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Capital Access and 
Job Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. REGISTRATION AND REPORTING EXEMPTIONS RELATING TO PRIVATE 
              EQUITY FUNDS ADVISORS.

    Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b-
3) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(o) Exemption of and Reporting Requirements by Private Equity 
Funds Advisors.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in this subsection, 
        no investment adviser shall be subject to the registration or 
        reporting requirements of this title with respect to the 
        provision of investment advice relating to a private equity 
        fund or funds.
            ``(2) Maintenance of records and access by commission.--Not 
        later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this 
        subsection, the Commission shall issue final rules--
                    ``(A) to require investment advisers described in 
                paragraph (1) to maintain such records and provide to 
                the Commission such annual or other reports as the 
                Commission taking into account fund size, governance, 
                investment strategy, risk, and other factors, as the 
                Commission determines necessary and appropriate in the 
                public interest and for the protection of investors; 
                and
                    ``(B) to define the term `private equity fund' for 
                purposes of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|Ohio Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|Ohio Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 99.9   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.0   | 0.9    | 84.8  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 80.6   | 69.5   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. SCOTT, B.

1485 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/08/2017

CP-08-CR-0000463-2015

(Bradford)

Affirmed/Vacated/Remanded
090P17

#### State v. Gregory Monroe

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed
Exhibit 32.1
 
 PET AIRWAYS, INC
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K of Pet Airways, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan Wiesel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in this reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 8th day of April 2011.
  /s/ Dan WieselDan WieselChief Executive Officer
#### Alexander Nemchyonok, Respondent, v Peng Liu Ying, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 811]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonina, J.), dated October 15, 2002, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]; *Rainey v Smith,*300 AD2d 383 [2002]; *Duldulao v City of New York,*284 AD2d 296 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit medical proof in admissible form that was contemporaneous with the accident showing any initial range of motion restrictions in his spine *(see Ifrach v Neiman,*306 AD2d 380 [2003]; *Pajda v Pedone,*303 AD2d 729 [2003]; *Lanza v Carlick,*279 AD2d 613, 614 [2001]; *Passarelle v Burger,*278 AD2d 294 [2000]). Furthermore, the affirmation of the plaintiffs examining physician did not provide any explanation for the significant gap between the plaintiffs initial treatment and his subsequent visit to the examining physician *(see Francis v Christopher,*302 AD2d 425 [2003]; *Dimenshteyn v Caruso,*262 AD2d 348 [1999]; *Perez v Velez,*253 AD2d 865 [1998]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|New York Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|New York Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 21    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 21     | 21     | 22     | 22     | 22     | 22     | 23     | 23     | 23     | 25    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 25     | 25     | 26     | 25     | 25     | 25     | 25     | 25     | 25     | 25    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 25     | 25     | 25     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Anthony GRAHAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5699

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### Eric GALLENTINE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3551

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

John Robert Johnson, Jr., and T &J Hauling C o., Inc., Appellant s

No. 06

- 14

- 00009

- CV v.

Bobby West, et al., Appellee s Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 12C1099

- 102 ). Opinion deli vered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and rema nd the cause for
further proceedings

. We further order that the appell ee , Bobby West, et al. , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 13, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Cl erk
WILLIE LANIER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-618

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E Markham, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
**EXHIBIT 15.2**

AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, CA 

Re: Registration Statement Nos. 333-62228, 333-01583 and333-125460 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 6, 2007related to our review of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not consideredpart of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

 

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

November 6, 2007
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d));    and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|               | /s/      Jose Mir            |   |
|--------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|               |                         |   |
| June      16, 2010 |          |   |
|               | Jose      Mir                |   |
|               | President                    |   |
|               |                         |   |
|               | /s/      Frank D. Benick     |   |
|               |                         |   |
| June      16, 2010 |          |   |
|               | Frank      D. Benick         |   |
|               | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1018 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

deduction for mortgage insurance premiums. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2011 

Mr. NUNES (for himself and Mr. CROWLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction for mortgage insurance premiums. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE IN4 SURANCE PREMIUMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

6 163(h)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend7 ed by striking clause (iv). 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to amounts paid or accrued after 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1018 IH

1 December 31, 2011, and to amounts properly allocable to 

2 periods after such date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1331

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHIT CON TIKI.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

WHIT CON TIKI.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel WHIT CON TIKI, United States official

9 number 663823.

Æ
Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 1077
#### Jeremy Allen SNYDER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Appellees.

CASE NO. 1D16-5684

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017

An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims. William R. Holley, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0030 SAT Date: 11/2/2012 Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 2 PMN 2 1 2 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: LUNG, IRR/CORROSION-S,E,MM,L, DEVEL, REPRO, N EURO, IMMUNO, MUTA, AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0030 FATE: PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis Half-life = min-hr VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90-99 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt moderate - strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes with reaction of the alkoxysilyl groups based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion from the reactivity of the compound and lung toxicity if inhaled based on the alkoxysilyl groups. Concerns for tin are developmental and reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity, and mutagenicity. Test Data: (-) for skin sensitization in a mouse local lymph node assay
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 4.7 daphnid 48-h LC50 23 green algal 96-h EC50 2.4 fish

_ chronic value 0.22 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.26
algal

_ chronic value 1.8
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions were based on SARs for alkoxysilanes and organo-Sn compounds with 16.9% Sn; ecotox chemical class: alkoxysilane - organo-Sn; MW 704; p H 7; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 100% active ingredients; mean measured concentrations; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 22

SARs Alkoxy Silanes & Organotins SAR Class Alkoxy Silanes & Organotins Ecotox Category Organotins
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Florida Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Florida Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.28   | 0.29   | 0.30   | 0.31   | 0.26   | 0.31   | 0.29  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.30   | 0.33   | 0.31   | 0.31   | 0.33   | 0.33   | 0.36   | 0.32   | 0.32   | 0.32  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.39   | 0.35   | 0.35   | 0.31   | 0.33   | 0.33   | 0.35   | 0.34   | 0.34   | 0.33  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.37   | 0.41   | 0.38   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024