alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ~DEi.NG

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-16-0501 August 30, 2016

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

Attention: Federal Aviation Administration Director, Flight Standards Service, AFS-1 The Boeing Company P

.O

. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Subject: Petition for Renewal ofExemption 8827D from 14 CFR Section 91.529(b), Flight Engineer Requirements
References: (a) Exemption No. 2718, Regulatory Docket No. 18897, Partial Grant of Exemption from 14 CFR Section 91.21 l(b), dated April 16, 1979. (b) Exemption No. 2718A, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-19374, dated October 21, 2004. (c) Exemption No. 8227D, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-19374, dated September 11, 2014.
The Boeing Company was granted, by Reference (a), an exemption from the requirements ofthe noted regulation to allow "flight engineers employed by the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company to serve as flight engineers on B-707, B-727, B-747 and B-767 aircraft ifthey have logged only 20 hours in lieu ofthe required 50 hours offlight time as flight engineers on the particular type aircraft within the preceding 6 calendar months provided the combined flight time in all ofthose aircraft is at least 100 hours in the preceding 6 calendar months."
In July 2004, the Boeing Company requested an amendment to the Reference (a) exemption to: (1) Increase the six (6) calendar month currencyperiod for flight hours to 12 months, (2) Consider flight simulatortime as equivalent to airplane flight time in fulfilling the required flight time requirements, and (3) Withdraw the request for exemption for Boeing Model 727 and 767 aircraft. The Reference (b) exemption was granted in response to that request.

# ~OE.IND

9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-16-0501 August 30,2016 Page 2 of2

Enclosed Reference (c) is the most recent renewal ofexemption from the Subject regulatory requirement that "permits flight engineers, employed by Boeing, to serve as flight engineers on B-707 and B-747 aircraft ifthey have logged a minimum of20 hours in lieu ofthe required 50 hours offlight time as flight engineers on the particular type aircraft within the preceding 12 months, provided the combined flight time in any B-707 orB-747, or Level B, C or D simulator that represents any B-707 orB-747 aircraft, is at least 100 hours in the preceding 12 calendar months

." The current Reference (c) exemption will expire on January 31, 2017.
The rationale and need for this exemption have not changed from the original application

. Boeing therefore requests a two-year renewal ofthe Reference (b) exemption.
Please contact Colin S. Fender at (206) 544-1974 with any questions or comments related to this matter. Sincerely,



# #,o,,- Caitlin M. Randles Supervisor, Flight Test Engineering FAA Coordination 

### MIC 14-KF Tel (206) 304-0075 Fax (206) 544-9875
EnclosureEnclosure to Boeing Letter 9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-16-0501 

### Page 1 of 2Enclosure to Boeing Letter 9R-TE-BBXA-BRB-16-0501 

### Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

OMARI KENYATTA WILSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 316 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24590-24591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Zenith Insurance, 
Ltd.--Fraudulent Bonding

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is regarding Treasury Department Circular 570; 1997 
Revision, published July 1, 1997, at 62 FR 35548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal bond-approving officers are advised 
that Zenith Insurance Company, Woodland Hills, CA, a Treasury certified 
company, does not issue construction, bid, performance or payment bonds 
and is in no way related to Zenith Insurance, Ltd. Zenith Insurance, 
Ltd. is not a Treasury approved surety company.
    Please refer to the State of California Department of Insurance 
Press Release #041, dated April 3, 1998, for additional information 
regarding Zenith Insurance, Ltd.
    Questions related to the authenticity of Zenith bonds should be 
directed to Zenith Insurance company at (818) 587-5721. The 
authenticity of its bonds currently in force, that were written during 
the past year, should also be verified.
    The Treasury Department Circular 570 may be viewed and downloaded 
through the Internet at http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570/index.html or 
through our computerized public bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) 
at (202) 874-6887. A hard copy of the Circular may be purchased from 
the Government Printing Office (GPO) Subscription Service, Washington, 
DC, Telephone (202) 512-1800. When ordering the Circular from GPO, use 
the following stock number: 048000-00509-8.

[[Page 24591]]

    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6A11, Hyattsville, MD 20792.

    Dated: April 27, 1998.
Mitchell A. Levine,
Assistant Commissioner, Financial Information, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-11800 Filed 5-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

MARYLIN JENKINS MILNER, A/K/A

MARYLIN JENKINS :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3016 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 157 DB 2023

(District of Columbia Court of Appeals,

No. 23

- BG

- 0545)

Attorney Registration No. 89828

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of January , 202 4

, having failed to respond to a Notice

and Order directing her to provide reasons against the imposition of reciprocal discipline,

Marylin Jenkins Milner, a/k/a Marylin Jenkins, is suspended from the practice of law in the

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for a period of 30 days

.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

E L P ASO

LIGHTSEY NATHAN SAUL, JR., )

) No. 08

- 1 2

- 00 030

- CR

Appellant, )

) Appeal from the 83rd District Court

vs. )

) of Pecos County, Texas

THE STATE OF TEXAS, )

) (TC# 2849 )

Appellee

. )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was originally du e March

8, 2012. The Court has granted numerous extensions of time, the most recent having been

granted until March 27 , 2013. Portions of the reporter’s record have been filed, but fourteen

volumes remain to be filed. The C ourt has been unsuccessful in its recent efforts to contact the

court reporter, Ms. Patricia Phelps

, regarding the missing volumes. Consequently, the Court has

determined it is necessary for the trial court to conduct a hearing regarding the court reporter’s

failure to timely file the reporter’s record in this appeal

.

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether

A ppellant has been deprived of the remaining portion of the re porter’s record for any reason,

including whether the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed

, such that Appellant might be

entitled to a new trial pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 34.6(f). The trial court shall determine the

following:

1. whether a significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and exhibits have been lost or

destroyed, and if so, whether the loss or destruction occurred without any fault of the

Appellant;

2. if the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, whether the lost or destroyed portion is

necessary to the appeal’s resolution;

3. if the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, whether it can be replaced by

agreement of the parties ; and

4. if the reporter’s record has not been lost or destroyed, the trial court shall determine the

earliest date the reporter’s record can be completed and filed in the cou rt of appeals.

1The trial court is authorized to hear evidence and to determine any additional matters it

deems relevant to this inquiry. The court is also authorized to enter any orders to ensure that the

reporter’s record is filed at the earliest date possible . The trial court is directed to make findings

of fact and conclusions of law regarding these matters and file same with the trial court clerk for

inclusion in a supplemental clerk’s record . The record of such hearing and the supplemental

clerk’ s record shall be forwarded to this Court on or before May 10, 2013

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of April , 201 3

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera , and Rodriguez , JJ.

2
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(b)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, John M. Presley, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 9, 2004.


                              /s/ John M. Presley
                              _______________________________

                              John M. Presley
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW845569_2.doc
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00405-CR

Reymundo Montiel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. CR-16-0379-E, THE HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Reymundo Montiel filed his notice of appeal on June 6, 2019. The 

reporter’s record was due on October 3, 2019. On the reporter’s requests, the time for filing was

extended to December 20, 2019. On January 2, 2020, Ms. Sheri Linder requested a fourth

extension of time. We order Linder to file the reporter’s record in this cause no later than 

January 13, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a). Failure to file the record will result in Linder

being called before the Court to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of 

this order.

It is ordered on January 7, 2020.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Triana

Do Not Publish
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

FRAMEWORK PUBLIC MEETING FOR RESIDENTIAL CENTRAL AIR 

CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585 

Room 1E-245 

Thursday, June 12, 2008 

Purpose 

The purpose of this public meeting is to hear the views of interested persons on the issues 

and process involved in a rulemaking to consider revised energy conservation standards 

for residential central air conditioners and heat pumps. The Department of Energy 

(DOE) will consider the views presented and comments submitted in developing its 

analyses for the standards rulemaking. 

Agenda 

 9:00 - 9:05 am Welcome 

 9:05 - 9:15 am Introduction and Agenda Review 

 Doug Brookman 

 9:15 - 10:15 am Opening Remarks from Interested Parties 

 Doug Brookman 

 Opportunity for interested parties to make brief summary 

comments. 

10:15 – 10:30 am Rulemaking Overview 

 Wes Anderson 

 Overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to 

generate results for each analysis, and the issues on which DOE 

would like input. 

10:30 – 10:45 am Test Procedures 

 Sriram Somasundaram 

 Summary of recent test procedure rulemaking activity and issues 

related to the test procedure on which DOE would like input. 

10:45 – 11:00 am Break 

 EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 COMMENT 05
11:00 - 12:00 pm Market and Technology Assessment, Screening Analysis, 

Engineering Analysis, and Preliminary Manufacturer Impact 

Analysis 

 Mike Christopher

 Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach 

 used and factors considered for the market and technology 

 assessment, screening analysis, engineering analysis, and 

preliminary manufacturer impact analysis. 

 

 12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch (on your own) 

 1:00 - 2:00 pm Energy Use Analysis, Markups for Equipment Price 

Determination, and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period 

Analysis 

 Sriram Somasundaram and Greg Rosenquist 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used 

and factors considered for the markups to determine equipment 

price analysis, energy use analysis, life-cycle cost and payback 

period analyses. 

 2:00 – 2:30 pm Shipments Analysis and National Impact Analysis 

 Greg Rosenquist 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used 

and factors considered for the national energy savings, net present 

value, and shipments analysis. 

 

 2:30 – 2:45 pm Break 

 2:45 – 3:30 pm Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) Analyses 

 Sriram Somasundaram, Mike Christopher, and Greg Rosenquist 

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used 

and factors considered for the NOPR analyses: life-cycle cost 

subgroup analysis, manufacturer impact analysis, utility impact 

analysis, employment impact analysis, environmental assessment, 

and regulatory impact analysis.

 3:30 – 4:00 pm Discussion of Issues & Closing Remarks 

 Doug Brookman & Wes Anderson 

 Summary of issues raised, presentation of closing remarks by 

DOE, and adjournment of the meeting.

 EERE-2008-BT-STD-0006 COMMENT 05
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1317 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1317

To amend the Public Health Service Act to require that certain entities 
  provide information concerning breast and cervical cancer, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 29 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Durenberger, and 
   Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to require that certain entities 
  provide information concerning breast and cervical cancer, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Breast and Cervical Cancer 
Information Act of 1993''.

SEC. 2. BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER INFORMATION.

    Title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300aaa et 
seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:

``SEC. 2715. BREAST AND CERVICAL CANCER INFORMATION.

    ``(a) In General.--Each of the entities referred to in subsection 
(b) shall make available, to such individuals as the entities determine 
appropriate, information (in a culturally competent manner) concerning 
breast and cervical cancer, including if appropriate, information on 
the need for breast self-examinations and the skills for such self-
examinations, and shall refer such clients as the entities determine 
appropriate for breast and cervical cancer screening, treatment or 
other services.
    ``(b) Entities.--The entities referred to in subsection (a) are--
            ``(1) a migrant health center receiving assistance under 
        section 329;
            ``(2) a community health center receiving assistance under 
        section 330;
            ``(3) an entity receiving assistance under section 340;
            ``(4) an alcohol or drug treatment entity or mental health 
        entity receiving assistance under title V or title XIX;
            ``(5) a family planning project described in section 1001;
            ``(6) an entity receiving assistance under title XXVI;
            ``(7) a clinic that treats sexually transmitted diseases 
        and is authorized under section 318;
            ``(8) an entity receiving funds to provide primary health 
        services to residents of public housing under section 340A;
            ``(9) a non-Federal entity authorized under the Indian 
        Self-Determination Act; and
            ``(10) a tuberculosis clinic receiving assistance under 
        section 317(j)(2) or 317(k)(2).''.

                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/Aof Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Bernard F. Denoyer as Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,respectively, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

August 11, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Bernard F. Denoyer |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | Bernard F. Denoyer     |
|   | Senior Vice President, |
|   | Finance                |

 

----

----
EXHIBIT 23.1











INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Towerstream Corporation on Amendment No.1 to Form S-3 (File No. 333-166239), Amendment No.1 to Form S-3(File No. 333-161135), Amendment No. 3 to Form SB-2 on Form S-3 (File No. 333-141405), Form S-8 (File No. 333-161180) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-151306) of our report dated March 17, 2011,with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Towerstream Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Towerstream Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Marcum llp





Marcum llp


New York, New York


March 17, 2011
#### Roberto GARCIA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0971

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 11, 2017

L.T. NO.: 09-31557

Denied.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Tennessee Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Tennessee Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### IN the INTEREST OF: K.S., a Minor

1662 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-51-DP-0015141-2005 (Philadelphia)

Appeal Dismissed