CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU

INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST – SUPPORTING STATEMENT

EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

(OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 3170-XXXX)

TERMS OF CLEARANCE: Not applicable. This is a new information collection request.

ABSTRACT: The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA or the Act) provides for payment of fees 

and expenses to eligible parties who have prevailed against the Consumer Financial Protection 

Bureau (Bureau) in certain administrative proceedings. In order to obtain an award, the statute 

and associated regulations (12 CFR Part 1071) require the filing of an application that shows that 

the party is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive an award under the Act. The Bureau 

regulations implementing the Act require the collection of information related to the application 

for an award in 12 CFR Part 1071, Subparts B, C. 

On June 29, 2012, the Bureau published in the Federal Register an interim final rule 

implementing the Act. 77 FR 39117. At that time, the Bureau adopted the position that the rule 

did not contain any information collection requirements that required the approval of OMB 

under the Paperwork Reduction Act (the “PRA”), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The Bureau has since 

changed its interpretation and now adopts the position that the rule does contain information 

collection requirements that require the approval of OMB under the PRA and invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to comment on the proposed information collections. 

A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Circumstances Necessitating the Data Collection

The Act provides for payment of fees and expenses to eligible parties who have prevailed against 

the Bureau in certain administrative proceedings. In order to obtain an award, the statute and 

associated regulations (12 CFR Part 1071) require the filing of an application that shows that the 

party is a prevailing party and is eligible to receive an award under the Act. The Bureau 

regulations implementing the Equal Access to Justice Act require information related to the 

application for an award in 12 CFR Part 1071, Subparts B, C. 

Specifically, subparts B and C require the following information from applicants: 

(a) Identity of the applicant and the proceeding for which the award is sought [§ 1071.200(a)];

(b) A showing that the applicant has prevailed; or, if the applicant has not prevailed, a showing 

that the Bureau’s demand was substantially in excess of the decision of the adjudicative officer 

and was unreasonable when compared with that decision, under the facts and circumstances of 

that case [§ 1071.200(b)];

(c) Identification of the Bureau position(s) in the proceeding that the applicant alleges was (were) 

not substantially justified; or, identification of the Bureau’s demand that is alleged to be 
excessive and unreasonable and an explanation as to why the demand was excessive and 

unreasonable [§ 1071.200(c)];

(d) A brief description of the type and purpose of the organization or business (unless the 

applicant is an individual) [§ 1071.200(d)];

(e) A statement of how the applicant meets the eligibility criteria of § 1071.103 [§ 1071.200(e)];

(f) The amount of fees and expenses incurred after the initiation of the adversary adjudication, or 

in the case of a claim for defending against an allegedly excessive demand, the amount of fees 

and expenses incurred after the initiation of the adjudicative proceeding attributable to the 

allegedly excessive portion of the demand [§ 1071.200(f)];

(g) Any other matter the applicant wishes the Bureau to consider in determining whether and in 

what amount an award should be made [§ 1071.200(g)]; 

(h) A written verification under oath or under penalty of perjury that the information provided is 

true and correct, accompanied by the signature of the applicant or an authorized officer or 

attorney [§ 1071.200(h)];

(i) Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based 

on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with 

the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 1071.305 [§ 

1071.302];

(j) Either the applicant or Bureau counsel may seek review of the recommended decision on the 

fee application by filing a notice of appeal under § 1081.402(a), or the Director may decide to 

review the decision on his or her own initiative, in accordance with § 1081.402(b) [§ 1071.307];

and

(k) An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the Bureau a copy of the Bureau’s 

final decision granting the award, accompanied by a statement that the applicant will not seek 

review of the decision in the United States courts [§ 1071.309].

2. Use of the Information

The information is used by agency adjudicative officers and the Director to determine whether an 

applicant is eligible for an award of fees and expenses under the Act, and whether the applicant 

is entitled to the amount claimed in the application. Since this is a “benefit” program, elimination 

of the information collection would much more directly harm the individual and small business 

applicants, rather than any government programs. Applicants would have to find some means of 

demonstrating eligibility. The consequence to the government is that, absent this information, the 

adjudicative officer would be unable to determine whether an applicant for an award against the 

government is eligible for such an award in accordance with the standards set forth in the statute.

3. Use of Information Technology
The use of improved information technology would not serve to reduce the burden since: (1) the 

number of applicants are relatively few; (2) the information provided by applicants is generally 

provided on a one-time basis; (3) not all applicants provide the same information; (4) signatures 

of the applicant and signature of an attorney are required; and (5) the burden on applicants is 

minimized by allowing them to provide the information in a format convenient to them. 

4. Efforts to Identify Duplication

The information is provided by applicants on a one-time basis in a specific proceeding and is 

made only to the agency from which fees and expenses are sought. Hence, the information 

requested of applicants does not duplicate any existing information collection.

5. Efforts to Minimize Burdens on Small Entities

The Bureau has minimized burden in two ways: (1) it has allowed applicants to provide 

information in a format convenient to them rather than prescribing a format that might request 

information not absolutely needed of all applicants; and (2) it has limited the information 

requested to that required by the statute. This information collection does not pose a significant 

impact on small entities. 

6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection and Obstacles to Burden Reduction

If the Bureau did not collect this information, it would not be in compliance with the Act. 

Further, this is not a recurring collection of information – respondents usually only provide the 

information one time.

7. Circumstances Requiring Special Information Collection

There are no special circumstances. The collection of information is conducted in a manner 

consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(2).

8. Consultation Outside the Agency

In accordance with 5 CFR §§ 1320.11(a) and 1320.8(d)(1), the Bureau has published a notice in 

the Federal Register allowing the public 60 days to comment on this proposed new collection of 

information. Comments received in response to this notice and the Bureau’s response to such 

comments will be summarized in the Notice of Final Rulemaking.

9. Payments or Gifts to Respondents

No payments or gifts are provided to respondents.

10. Assurances of Confidentiality

No assurance of confidentiality is provided to respondents. 
11. Justification for Sensitive Questions

The Equal Access to Justice Act requires that an applicant’s total net worth fall below a certain 

threshold to be eligible for an award (See 5 U.S.C. § 504(b)). This is the only question of a 

sensitive nature contained in this information collection and it is required by statute.

12. Estimated Burden of Information Collection

Summary of Burden:

Number 

of respondents

Estimated 

annual 

frequency

Average time

per response

Estimated 

annual 

burden 

hours

Application for reimbursement 3 1 5 hours 15

We expect as many as 3 applications will be filed annually with the Bureau. As described in the 

response to Item 4, these applications are filed on a one-time basis. We expect that the average 

completion time for an application will be five hours. Accordingly, we estimate the annual 

burden as follows: 

3 respondents x 1 response x 5 hours = 15 total burden hours. 

We estimate that each application will require 3 hours of work by a paralegal or legal assistant 

and 2 hours of work by an attorney. According to BLS’s National Occupational Employment 

and Wage Estimates, the national mean hourly wage for a paralegal or legal assistant is $24.15

and the national mean hourly wage for an attorney is $62.93. The burden hour cost to each 

respondent is $72.45 for three hours of paralegal or legal assistant work and $125.86 for two 

hours of attorney work for a total cost of $198.31 per respondent. For three respondents, the 

total burden hour cost is $594.93. 

13. Estimated Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Recordkeepers 

For the purposes of this information collection request, it is assumed that each eligible party 

would expend $2.00 on postage and associated mailing material. The cost to the 3 respondents is 

estimated to be $6.00.

14. Estimated Cost to the Federal Government

Estimating the costs to the government is a speculative venture for two reasons: 

(a) The amount of time necessary to respond to and defend the application varies greatly, 

depending upon the number and difficulty of the issues involved; and 

(b) The amount and level of resources depend on the factors described above. Certain cases can

be disposed by two hours work from a mid-level attorney; other cases may require ten or more 
hours by a staff attorney, two from supervisory-level attorney, and one hour of secretarial help. 

However, the Bureau does not plan to hire any additional attorneys as a result of this collection 

of information, therefore, the Bureau does not anticipate any costs associated with this collection 

of information that it would not have otherwise incurred without it.

15. Program Changes or Adjustments

This is a new collection of information.

16. Plans for Tabulation, Statistical Analysis, and Publication

This is not a collection of information for statistical use. 

17. Display of Expiration Date

The Bureau is not seeking such approval. There are no forms associated with this information 

collection on which to display an expiration date. 

18. Exceptions to the Certification Requirement

The Bureau is not seeking exceptions to the certification statement.