alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Minnesota Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Minnesota Natural Gas % of Total Industrial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 52.7  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 58.0   | 58.2   | 57.7   | 56.6   | 57.1   | 65.4   | 58.7   | 59.6   | 60.3   | 60.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 59.6   | 58.1   | 58.8   | 54.9   | 59.0   | 58.9   | 65.6   | 65.8   | 72.3   | 71.6  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 77.6   | 80.7   | 82.2   | 80.5   | 82.1   | 84.5   | 84.3   | 82.9   | 81.9   | 81.4  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 80.4   | 81.4   | 83.2   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1388

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain chemicals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSIONS OF DUTY ON CERTAIN CHEMI4 CALS.

5 Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tar6 iff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting

7 in numerical sequence the following new subheadings:

‘‘ 9902.31.12 Hexafluoroisopropylidene2,2-bis(phthalic

acid anhydride)

(6,Fluoro

Dianhydride)

(CAS No.

1107–00–2)

(provided for

in subheading

2932.90.45) .... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/96 ’’.
2

•S 1388 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendment made by section 1 applies with re3 spect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for

4 consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of

5 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Order entered April 29 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00203
- CR JOAN NOIS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13
- 58111
- L



### O RDER
The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desire s to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall cond uct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representa tion, which may include appointment of new counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. This appeal is ABA TED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 20.1   | 36.6   | 45.5   | 50.4   | 44.6  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 40.7   | 39.5   | 40.0   | 40.9   | 44.5   | 48.8   | 43.7   | 24.0   | 25.1   | 14.7  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12.3   | 11.4   | 5.1    | 5.5    | 5.5    | 1.8    | 1.5    | 1.6    | 1.5    | 1.6   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.3    | 0.3    | 0.4    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
064P17

#### In re the Appeal by Toney L. Harrell and Harrell’s Land Development Co., Inc. v. The Midland Board of Adjustment and the Town of Midland

1. Petitioners’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-646)

2. Respondent’s (Town of Midland) Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied

2. Dismissed as moot
FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 9/17/2015 11:09:08 AM LISA MATZ Clerk
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Oregon Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)   
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Oregon Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)   
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 55     | 43     | 39     | 43     | 44     | 50    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
462P16

#### State v. David Lee Applewhite

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-335)

Denied
No. 12-6617.

#### Wedderburn *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
February 25, 2013 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Montana Department of Transportation 

Aeronout1cs D1v1sion 

2630 Airport Rood 

PO Box 200507 

Helena MT 59620...{)507 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: EAS Carrier Selection. DOT-OST-2003-14626 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Michael T. ~oley, Director 

Steve Bullock. Governor 

The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is pleased to offer the following 

comments relative to the selection of an Essential Air Service (EAS) air carrier at the 

Yellowstone Airport (WYS) for the 2013 and 2014 summer seasons. 

SkyWest Airlines has served this region for many years with excellent service, qualified 

staff and supportive local interaction related to the air carrier needs of West Yellowstone. 

MDT supports the proposal from SkyWest Airlines and the recommendation of the Town 

of West Yellowstone to continue with SkyWest for the 2013 and 2014 seasons. 

MDT is proud of our partnership with the Town of West Yellowstone and the U.S 

Department of Transportation and appreciate the opportunity to comment on this 

important selection process. 

Ci!' 

Mike Tooley 

Director 

copies:Debbie Alke, Aeronautics Division Administrator 

Jerry Johnson, Mayor, Town of West Yellowstone 

Brad Rawson, SkyWest Airlines 

An Equal Opportunity Employer
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|South Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|South Dakota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 261    | 267    | 270   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 275    | 283    | 319    | 355    | 381    | 396    | 444    | 481    | 464    | 445   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 416    | 402    | 533    | 526    | 475    | 542    | 528    | 548    | 598    | 598   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 580    | 556    | 574    | 566    | 575    | 578    | 548    | 592    | 592    | 598   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 585    | 548    | 548    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          35,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  594,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,556
<INVENTORY>                                    373,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,039,514
<PP&E>                                       1,830,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                 900,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,588,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          673,519
<BONDS>                                        549,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,438
<OTHER-SE>                                     430,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,588,294
<SALES>                                      1,040,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,040,386
<CGS>                                          736,485
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  736,485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,570
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,267
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4316-N-02]


Announcement of Funding Award--Fiscal Year 1998 Lead-Based Paint 
Hazard Control, Children's Hospital Research Foundation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary--Office of Lead Hazard Control, HUD.

ACTION: Announcement of funding award.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989, this announcement 
notifies the public of a funding decision made by the Department to the 
Children's Hospital Research Foundation. This announcement contains the 
name and address of the awardee and the amount of the award.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Friedman, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410, 
telephone (202) 755-1785, ext. 159. Hearing- or speech-impaired 
individuals may access this number by calling the Federal Information 
Relay Service TTY at 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control grant for the Children's 
Hospital Research Foundation was issued pursuant to Pub. L. 102-550, 
Title X, Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992.
    This notice announces the award of $239,938 to the Children's 
Hospital Research Foundation which will be used to evaluate house dust 
sample collection methods to identify a single collection activity to 
obtain samples that can be analyzed for both lead dust and allergens.
    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for this program 
is 14.900.
    In accordance with section 102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of 
Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (103 Stat. 1987, 42 
U.S.C. 3545), the Department is publishing the name, address, and 
amount of the award as follows:

Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Division of General 
Pediatrics, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229.

Amount of Grant: $239,938.

    Dated: April 1, 1998.
David E. Jacobs,
Director, Office of Lead Hazard Control.
[FR Doc. 98-11390 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Joseph C. Visconti, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report on Form 10-K of ValueRich, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ValueRich, Inc.





Dated: March 31, 2010
By:
/s/ Joseph C. ViscontiJoseph C. ViscontiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-41182 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE CHAVEZ-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1014-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent J o s e C h a v e z - V a l e n c ia (Chavez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has f i l e d a brief i n accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chavez has filed a response. We have r eviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well

as Chavez’s response. We concur with counsel’s asses s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivo l o u s issue for appellate review. Accordingly, c ounsel’s U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 20, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-41182 Document: 00512282241 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2013No. 12-41182

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS D ISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 12-41182 Document: 00512282241 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2013