alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MAY
DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                              18
<SECURITIES>                                        16
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                        69
<INVENTORY>                                      3,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,303
<PP&E>                                           7,623
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,775
<BONDS>                                          3,567
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,025
<SALES>                                          9,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,435
<CGS>                                            6,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    688
<INCOME-TAX>                                       274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       414
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15


</TABLE>
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Minnesota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Minnesota Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,585  | 2,670  | 2,638 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,574  | 2,486  | 2,515  | 2,477  | 2,592  | 2,531  | 2,564  | 2,233  | 2,188  | 2,267 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,025  | 1,996  | 2,029  | 2,074  | 2,040  | 1,432  | 1,257  | 1,146  | 1,131  | 2,039 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,106  | 1,770  | 1,793  | 1,870  | 1,880  | 1,818  | 2,026  | 2,059  | 2,162  | 2,120 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,192  | 2,037  | 2,004  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Maine Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Maine Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.08   | 0.08   | 0.08   | 0.08   | 0.08   | 0.08   | 0.08  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.09   | 0.09   | 0.16   | 0.15   | 0.15   | 0.16   | 0.17   | 0.19   | 0.19   | 0.18  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.19   | 0.21   | 0.25   | 0.25   | 0.26   | 0.31   | 0.28   | 0.28   | 0.27   | 0.28  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.28   | 0.28   | 0.27   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00102

- CR

WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 123rd District Court Panola County, Texas Trial Court No. 13,122

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
William Robert Parker was convic ted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in February 1981. On April 26, 2018, Parker filed an “Out of Time Motion For New Trial” in the
trial court. On May 9, 2018, the trial court denied that motion, and on May 29, 2018, Parker filed
a notice of appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion. In the State of Texas, a party may appeal only when the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal. Galitz v. State , 617 S.W.2d 949, 951 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). When the Legislature passes such authori zing legislation, in addition to granting its citizens the right of appeal, it also grants the appellate courts of this State jurisdiction to hear those appeals. In the absence of such authorizing legislation, appellate courts are without jurisdiction and have no authority to act. Generally speaking, in the criminal context, the Texas Legislature has authorized appeals by criminal defendants only from written judgments of conviction. See Gutierrez v. State , 307 S.W.3d 318, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Ex p ar te Shumake , 953 S.W.2d 842, 844 (Tex. App.

— Austin 1997, no pet.). There are a few very limited exceptions to this general rule, see Wright v.
State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1998, no pet.), but the trial court’s May 9 order denying Parker’s m otion for an out of time appeal does not fall within one of those exceptions. Thus, the trial court’s May 9 order is not an order from which the Texas Legislature has authorized an appeal. By letter dated June 13, 2018, we informed Parker of the potential jurisdictional issue stemming from the lack of an appealable order and provided Parker an opportunity to demonstrate how we have jurisdiction notwithstanding the noted defect. Although Par ker filed a response to our jurisdictional3

defect letter, that response failed to demonstrate how this Court has jurisdiction over Parker’s attempted appeal. Because the trial court’s May 9, 2018, denial of Parker’s “Out of Time Motion For New Trial”
doe s not constitute an appealable order, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III Chief Justice
Date Submitted: July 11 , 2018 Date Decided: July 1 2 , 2018
Do Not Publish
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Kansas Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
May 16 th , 201 6

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Amendment to CMI petition for exemption r equest under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. Exemption No. 13166, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3049

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Conservation Management Institute (CMI), a research center within the College of Natural Resources and Environment at Virginia Tech , requests an ame ndment to the existing Section

333 exemption allowing CMI to operate a SenseFly eBee sUAS for commercial purposes.

The exemption in question is Exemption No. 13166, Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3049.

CMI would like to expand its equipment list to include other makes and models of UAS and requests that the exemption granted to CMI be amended to condition #1 of the exemption that limited CMI use of UAS to the SenseFly eBee.

We request that our exemption include approval of all UAS contained with in the current FAA

document Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Make/Model Under Section 333 . We believe that the number of Section 333’s granted with the UAS from this list demonstrates the safety of these out

- of

- the

- box systems and will allow CMI greater capacity and flexibility with regards to our mission to increase the capacity of our partner’s ability to efficiently manage

natural resources

.

CMI will continue to operate any and all UAS in a professional manner and in a fashion that will not violate any of the oth er conditions of the exemption . N or will CMI allow any UAS to operate in a manner that is not conducive with the safety and interest of the public.

You will find a copy of the most curre nt list of approved UAS as well as CMI ’ s original Section

333 Exception attached

.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Daniel Cross Chief UAS Operator/GIS Technician Conservation management Institute Virginia Polytechnic Institute and state University

1900 Kraft Drive

Suite 250 Blacksburg, VA 24061

540

- 231

- 4668
falkus@vt.edu
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Virginia Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 6,880   | 4,346   | 8,901   | 15,041  | 15,427  | 19,223  | 18,424  | 17,935 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 14,774  | 14,906  | 24,733  | 37,840  | 50,259  | 49,818  | 54,290  | 58,249  | 57,263  | 72,189 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 71,545  | 71,543  | 76,915  | 143,644 | 85,508  | 88,610  | 103,027 | 112,057 | 128,454 | 140,738
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 147,255 | 151,094 | 146,405 | 139,382 | 133,661 | 127,586 | 120,288 | 115,452 | 111,476 | 106,311
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 102,784 | 95,972  | 88,937  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
No. 12-6659.

#### Villa-Madrigal *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. RUSSELL, S.

1688 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/25/2017

CP-25-CR-0001497-2016

(Erie)

Quashed
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles Lesser, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Panglobal Brands Inc.
      for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Panglobal Brands Inc.                                                                  

Dated: January 14, 2008

/s/ Charles LesserCharles LesserChief Financial
Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
AccountingOfficer)Panglobal Brands Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Panglobal Brands
Inc. and will be retained by Panglobal Brands Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
exhibit102.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  





 



EXHIBIT 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
TO THE
TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


WHEREAS, Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains for the benefit of eligible employees of the Company and certain subsidiaries of the Company a supplemental executive retirement plan designated the “Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan” (the “Plan”); 


WHEREAS, the Plan was most recently amended and restated, effective January 1, 2009; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan further to change the frequency of crediting assumed earnings to participant accounts from annually to quarterly.


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 6.1 of the Plan, the Plan hereby is amended, effective as of January 1, 2012, as follows:


1.         Section 2.3 hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


2.3    Earnings and Other Adjustments.  For bookkeeping purposes only, the account established for each Participant pursuant to Section 2.2 shall be adjusted as of the last day of each calendar quarter (each such date, an “Adjustment Date”) until the Participant’s account has been distributed in its entirety to reflect (i) any distributions made to the Participant (or his or her Beneficiary) pursuant to Section 3; (ii) any forfeiture of the account, or a portion thereof, pursuant to Section 3.1(b); and (iii) an assumed rate of earnings equal to one-fourth of the annual yield on ten year BBB rated industrial bonds for the last trading date of the immediately preceding Plan 













 


  





Year as quoted by Standard & Poors.  For the purpose of crediting assumed earnings, the Participant’s account shall be deemed to exclude, and thus assumed earnings for a calendar quarter shall not be credited on, (X) any distributions made to the Participant (or his or her Beneficiary) pursuant to Section 3 on or prior to the applicable Adjustment Date; (Y) any portion of the account forfeited pursuant to Section 3.1(b) on or prior to the applicable Adjustment Date and (Z) any contributions credited to the account pursuant to Section 2.2 which are attributable to the Plan Year during which the applicable Adjustment Date occurs.



2.         Section 3.3 hereby is amended to replace the phrase “adjusted each Plan Year” set forth in the first sentence thereof with the phrase “adjusted each calendar quarter”.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment Number One to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 15th day of March, 2012.


 




	TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
	 	 
	

   By:
	/s/ LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. 
		Chief Executive Officer, Chier Financial
Officer or Vice President Human Resources
	 	 
	By:	/s/ C. T. Herbert 
	 	Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer of Vice President Human Resources