alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Missouri Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Missouri Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 283,294 | 258,652 | 265,798
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 284,763 | 283,793 | 275,629 | 262,529 | 263,945 | 268,040 | 252,697 | 272,536 | 296,058 | 264,867
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 280,181 | 272,583 | 255,875 | 276,967 | 297,087 | 267,673 | 267,170 | 261,993 | 322,805 | 320,115
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 296,891 | 287,330 | 306,590 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
066P17

#### State v. Rocky Kurt Williamson

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-631)

2. State's Petition for *Writ of Supwsedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. State’s Petition for *Writ of CertioraH*to Review Order of COA

1. Allowed 02/27/2017

2.

3.

4.
# C_2019386EN.01002101.xml

| 14.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 386/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 386/21

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting of 5 July 2019 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case AT.40432 — Character Merchandise

Rapporteur: Slovenia

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 386/06)

1.

The Advisory Committee (7 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The Advisory Committee (7 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment in the draft decision as regards the duration of the infringement.

3.

The Advisory Committee (7 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

4.

The Advisory Committee (7 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

5.

The Advisory Committee (7 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Richard DeCicco, the President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of Iconic Brands, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KA of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KA fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: March 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Richard DeCiccoName: Richard DeCiccoTitle: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|No chart available.                                                                       
|No chart available.                                                                       
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Warroad, MN Natural Gas Pipeline Exports (Price) Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Soltera Mining Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Fabio Montanari, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

***  /s/ Fabio Montanari***

**Fabio Montanari**

Chief Financial Officer 

December 23, 2013
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,222  | 343   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 231    | 188    | 420    | 301    | 321    | 349    | 397    |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 414    | 429    | 387    | 438    | 403    | 403    | 416    | 414    | 445    | 461   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 494    | 457    | 452    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Virginia Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Virginia Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 248,960 | 260,332 | 276,793
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 268,770 | 237,853 | 258,202 | 262,970 | 277,434 | 299,746 | 274,175 | 319,913 | 299,364 | 319,134
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 375,421 | 373,444 | 410,106 | 418,506 | 419,705 | 500,477 | 543,343 | 566,676 | 634,162 | 683,049
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 713,443 | 666,049 | 646,591 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
THEA'ITORNEYGENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN. TEXAS 78711 

February 13. 1974 

The Honorable Joe Resweber 

County Attorney 

Harris County Courthouse 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Opinion No. H- 229 

Re: How should the penalty and 

interest, if any, be calculated 

on the additional tax due under 

the “rollback” provision of the 

Agricultural Use Amendment 

(Article 8, 5 l-d) of the Texas 

Constitution? 

Dear Mr. Resweber: 

You have asked for an opinion of this office on the following question: 

“How should the penalty and interest, if any, be 

calculated on the additional tax due under ,the ‘rollback’ provision of the Agricultural Use Amendment 

(Article 8, 5 1-d Tex. Const. )?” 

Article 8, $ 1-d,~ of the Texas Constitution provides a partial tax 

exemption in connection with land use for agricultural purposes. Subsection 

(a) of this provision states: 

“(a) All land owned by natural persons 

which is designated for agricultural use in accordance 

with the provisions of this Section shall be assessed 

for all tax purposes on the consideration of only those 

factors relative to such agricultural use. ‘Agricultural use’ means the raising of livestock or growing of 

crops, fruit, flowers, and other products of the soil 

under natural conditions as a business venture for 

profit, which business is the primary occupation and 

source of income of the owner. ‘I 

p. 1070 
The Honorable Joe Resweber. page 2 (H-229) 

Subsection (f), about which you are concerned, provides as follows: 

“(f) Each year during which the land is 

designated for agricultural use, the local tax assessor 

shall note on his records the valuation which would have 

been made had the land not qualified for such designation 

under this Section. If designated land is subsequently.. 

diverted to a purpose other than that of agricultural use, 

or is sold, the land shall be subject to an additional tax. 

The additional tax shall equal the difference between 

taxes paid or payable, hereunder, and the amount of 

tax payable for the preceding three years had the land 

been otherwise assessed. ” 

In our opinion the additional tax contemplated by subsection (f) does 

not become due until the land is shown not to qualify for agriculturalusetaxation 

pursuant to Subsection (a), supra. Penalties and interest become due under 

Article 7336, V. T. C. S. only if the additional tax is not paid at that time. 

SUMMARY 

The additional tax provided for under Article 8,: $1-d(f), 

of the Texas Constitution does not accrue until~the ,year in which 

the land is diverted to a non-agricultural use or is shown not to 

qualify for taxation pursuant to Article 8, $ l-d(a) above and is 

not subject to penalties and interest, unless there is a refusal 

to pay the additional tax at that time. 

Yours very truly, 

c/ JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General of Texas 

p. 1071 
The Honorable Joe Reswkber,page 3 (H-229) 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 1072
No. D-2687.

#### In re Disbarment of Siegelman.

[For earlier order herein, see 567 U. S. 960.]

Disbarment entered.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 2.14   | 2.05   | 2.15   | 2.12   | 2.32   | 2.45   | 2.37  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.33   | 2.59   | 2.64   | 2.45   | 2.48   | 2.57   | 2.73   | 2.77   | 2.74   | 2.70  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2.74   | 2.76   | 2.79   | 2.76   | 2.60   | 2.65   | 2.81   | 2.69   | 2.56   | 2.84  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.92   | 2.87   | 2.87   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Mary Puija et al., Appellants, v Anthony Dintino, Respondent.

[768 NYS2d 614]

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), dated January 29, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion to vacate his default in answering the complaint and for leave to serve a late answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to vacate his default in answering the complaint and for leave to serve a late answer *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v Arthur Andersen & Co.,*60 NY2d 693 [1983]; *Parker v City of New York,*272 AD2d 310 [2000]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
No. 12-6309.

#### Williams *v.*California.

Sup. Ct. Cal. Cer-tiorari denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH SACHS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ROBERT DICARLO, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 22-16259 

D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00471-MTL 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2023**

Before: TASHIMA, S.R. THOMAS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Sachs appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of state child custody 

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on 

any basis supported by the record. Thompson v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-16259 

Cir. 2008). We affirm.

Dismissal of Sachs’s federal constitutional claim was proper because Sachs 

failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 

U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient 

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its 

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Benavidez v. County of San 

Diego, 993 F.3d 1134, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2021) (setting forth requirements to state 

a violation of a constitutional right to familial association through judicial 

deception). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining supplemental 

jurisdiction over Sachs’s remaining state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3)

(“The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a 

[state-law] claim . . . if . . . the district court has dismissed all claims over which it 

has original jurisdiction.”). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying leave to amend 

because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home 

Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review 

and explaining that leave to amend may be denied when amendment would be 

futile). 

We do not consider arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See
3 22-16259 

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.