alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Illinois Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Illinois Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 7      | 8      | 12     | 29     | 31     | 32     | 167    | 173    | 215   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 236    | 293    | 298    | 364    | 409    | 318    | 271    | 244    | 233    | 238   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 294    | 261    | 262    | 287    | 407    | 393    | 473    | 186    | 135    | 126   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 99     | 70     | 75     | 61     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 15.1

McMoRan Exploration Co.
1615 Poydras St.
New Orleans, La. 70112

July 25, 2002

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of McMoRan Exploration
Co.:

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form Nos. 333-67485, 333-67963, 333-95195,
333-57484, 333-87380 and 333-90170) of  McMoRan Exploration Co. of
our report dated July 25, 2002 relating to the unaudited condensed
interim financial statements of McMoRan Exploration Co. that is
included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report
is not a part of the registration statements prepared or
certified by accountants within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of
the Securities Act of 1933.

                              Very truly yours,

                              /s/Ernst & Young LLP
#### COM. v. MEDINA, J.

1559 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/17/2017

CP-51-CR-0009759-2011 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Randy Schmutz, Appellant

No. 06-12-00059-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 76th District Court of 

Titus County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR14,334). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Randy Schmutz, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 22, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No

. FAA

- 20 15

- 3821 Directorate ID : 2014

- SW

- 025

- AD

Helicopter Model:

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : These proposed actions are intended to detect a crack and prevent failure of an M/R
blade and subsequent loss of helicopter control.

Costs :

 Cleaning and performing all inspecti o n s of a set of M/R blades (2 per helicopter ) would require a half work

- hour . No parts would be needed. A t an estimat ed 24 inspections a year , the

cost would be $1,0 32 per helicopter and $53,664 for the U.S. fleet.

 Replacing an M/R blade would require 12 work hours and p arts would cost $90,656 for a total cost of $91,6 7 6 per blade

.

Executive Order 12866 : Could the A D be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substant ial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : Charles Harrison
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.

    Name of SEP: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel.
    Date: April 14, 1998.
    Place: Conference Call, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bldg. 38A, Rm. 5N-
519, Bethesda, MD 20894.
    Contact: Sharee Pepper, Scientific Review Administrator, EP, 
8600 Rockville Pike, Bldg. 38A, Rm. 5N-519, Bethesda, Maryland 
20894, 301/496-4253.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review one grant application.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
above meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations by 
the grant review and funding cycle.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93-879--Medical 
Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: April 10, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-10233 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 35.1









Annual Statement of Compliance

TILES Trust No. 2006-1



VIA: EMAIL



MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036



Reference is made to the
Trust Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee, for TILES Trust No. 2006-1, dated February 15, 2006, together with Schedules I, II and III attached
thereto, and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee dated March 5, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings defined
in the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President
of U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to
LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:



1.A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee under
the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.







Date: February 23, 2020



U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest
to Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee







By: /s/ Kimberly O.
Jacobs

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
125P17

#### State v. Paul Anthony Ramey

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Rehearing *En Banc*(COA16-876)

Dismissed
#### BLOOMINGDALE TRAILS HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. Jeff W. WESTBROOK and The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWABS, Inc., Asset-Back Notes, Series 2006-SD1. Appellees.

Case No. 2D16-4098

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

*521Leslie M. Conklin, Clearwater, for Appellant.

Dariel Abrahamy' and Victor Kline of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Bo'ca Raton, for Appellee The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, As Trustee For the Certificateholders CWABS, Inc., Asset-Back Notes, Series 2006 SD1.

No Appearance for Appellee Jeff W. Westbrook.

PER CURIAM.

Finding- no merit in the substantive argument raised in this appeal, we affirm the judgment below. However, we remand for the circuit court to enter an amended final judgment of foreclosure that clarifies that the Bloomingdale Trails Homeowners’ Association’s lien on the subject property is not affected by the entry of the judgment. Cf. Fortune v. Hutchinson, 20 So.3d 476, 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (affirming and remanding for clarification where circuit court’s declaratory judgment failed to indicate a litigant’s type of “ownership interest” in certain property).

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Eddie Bauer Holdings, Inc.

Bellevue, Washington

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-144385) and Form S-8 (No. 333-145512) of Eddie Bauer Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated April 2, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of Eddie Bauer Holdings, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting which appear in this Form 10-K.



|                    
|--------------------
|                    
|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
|Seattle, Washington 
|April 2, 2009
# C_2019379EN.01000101.xml

| 8.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9543 — Diamond Transmission Corporation/Infrared Capital Partners/Chubu/Walney JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 379/01)

On 31 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9543. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9543. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 21 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CAINEY ROBERTS, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES RAY, Warden; THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-7117

(E.D. Okla.)

(D.Ct. No. 97-CV-500-B)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge, BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge, and

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Mr. Cainey Roberts, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his federal

petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This

court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253. Mr. Roberts

claims he is entitled to habeas relief because the Oklahoma Court of Criminal
1

 Parker v. State, 917 P.2d 980, 985-86 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996) (defective

criminal information raises due process concerns, but is not fatal to jurisdiction), cert.

denied, 519 U.S. 1096 (1997), overruled Miller v. State, 827 P.2d 875, 879 (Okla. Crim.

App. 1992) (criminal information must specifically allege each element of the crime to

confer jurisdiction on the trial court).

2

 Contrary to the contentions in Mr. Roberts’ brief, the state appellate court did not

apply Parker in his direct appeal. Roberts v. State, No. F-93-482, slip op. at 3-4 (Okla.

Crim. App. May 1, 1996) (unpublished opinion). Rather, the court relied on an

unpublished opinion, Masquat v. State, No. F-93-1369 (Okla. Crim. App. July 26, 1996). 

Masquat held “[t]he term ‘premeditated design’ ... was sufficient in this Information to

set forth the element of malice aforethought.” Id. at 4. Obviously, the result in Masquat

does not bode well for Mr. Roberts and may explain his decision to submit an ex post

facto argument to this court. Nevertheless, we acknowledge Mr. Roberts’ reliance on

Parker in his ex post facto argument before this court and dispose of his claim

accordingly.

3

 Sallahdin was decided after we heard oral argument in this case.

-2-

Appeals violated ex post facto principles when it applied Parker v. State1 to his

direct appeal. Mr. Roberts argues Parker was an unexpected and unforeseeable

new rule of law and the application of Parker in his direct appeal2 denied him due

process of law.

Mr. Roberts acknowledges his argument hinges on whether this court

determines Parker was unforeseeable. This court recently held the result in

Parker was foreseeable. Sallahdin v. Gibson, 275 F.3d 1211, 1228 (10th Cir.

2002).

3

 Mr. Roberts’ arguments are substantially the same as those we considered
-3-

and rejected in Sallahdin. See id. at 1227-28. Therefore, the district court’s

denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.

Entered by the Court:

WADE BRORBY

United States Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>     0000064500
<NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,208
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,959,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                   104,332
<INVENTORY>                                  3,974,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,232,861
<PP&E>                                       1,179,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                 585,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,947,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,054,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        248
<COMMON>                                       123,771
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,019,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,947,600
<SALES>                                      3,475,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,475,423
<CGS>                                        1,969,464
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,422,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   123,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 Company
 1.
    
    The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Date: June 1, 2010/s/ Delfín Jorge Ezequiel CarballoName:
    
    Delfín Jorge Ezequiel CarballoTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 5.43   | 5.54   | 5.40   | 5.32   | 5.27   | 4.82   | 5.11  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.26   | 5.01   | 4.89   | 5.22   | 5.09   | 5.08   | 4.71   | 4.90   | 4.69   | 4.76  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.68   | 4.66   | 4.76   | 4.73   | 5.01   | 5.11   | 4.96   | 4.96   | 5.06   | 4.72  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4.73   | 4.80   | 4.78   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Montana Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Montana Natural Gas Vehicle Fuel Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4.59   | 4.50   | 4.51   | 5.17   | 4.34   | 4.61   | 3.93   | 3.83   | 4.18   | 3.79  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6.45   | 6.71   | 4.73   | 7.63   | 9.28   | 10.19  | 10.02  | 7.64   | 11.50  | 9.08  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9.60   | 8.20   | 6.48   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024