alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Rhode Island Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,499  | 1,663 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,311  | 1,367  | 1,217  | 922    | 981    | 900    | 1,031  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,542  | 1,756  | 1,917  | 2,011  | 1,987  | 2,004  | 2,351  | 2,700  | 2,787  | 2,979 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,110  | 3,069  | 2,829  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25207-25208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1767-002]


Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd.; Notice of Filing

May 1, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 8, 1998, Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., 
filed

[[Page 25208]]

supplemental information to Rate Schedule No. 1 to comply with Ordering 
Paragraph (F) of the Commission's order issued March 30, 1998, in 
Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., Docket No. ER97-1767-000 (82 FERC 
para. 61,323).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules and 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before May 11, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission to determine the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12120 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Nebraska Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Nebraska Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |        |         |         |         | 114,503 | -26,329 | -85,303
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -91,465 | -59,373 | -38,115 | -3,440 | -16,330 | -2,614  | 144,828 | 7,484   | 10,581  | 22,913 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 17,609  | 22,029  | 26,877  | 13,935 | -739    | -12,176 | 7,632   | 49,970  | -56,491 | -14,473
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 47,610  | 97,556  | 133,690 |        |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10439

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND LEE BECK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CR-68-ALL-L

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Raymond Lee Beck

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro,

377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to the United

States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|New Jersey Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|New Jersey Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 208,614 | 206,976
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 218,371 | 193,985 | 192,994 | 201,583 | 203,046 | 205,741 | 205,392 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 200,680 | 196,963 | 192,913 | 185,030 | 186,591 | 190,255 | 190,406 | 193,326 | 194,999 | 199,466
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 201,242 | 204,641 | 207,521 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marvin Brown, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 243]

*1424Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Reed, J.), entered September 20, 2002, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (§ 220.03). County Court properly denied defendant’s request for a *Darden*hearing *(see People v Darden,*34 NY2d 177 [1974], *rearg denied*34 NY2d 995 [1974]) because defendant did not challenge the existence of the confidential informant *(see People v Serrano,*93 NY2d 73, 77 [1999]; *People v Reynoso,*295 AD2d 156, 157 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 701 [2002]; *People v Mingo,*117 AD2d 353, 356 [1986], *lv denied*68 NY2d 772 [1986]).

Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence, i.e., the eyewitness testimony of the police officer and confidential informant, along with the forensic testimony establishing the existence of cocaine *(see People v McGlocton,*267 AD2d 614, 614-615 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 905 [2000]). In addition, defendant contends that the discrepancy in the testimony concerning the weight of the cocaine requires dismissal of the indictment. We reject that contention. Any such discrepancy goes to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility, especially where, as here, the People’s witnesses offered an explanation for the discrepancy *(see People v Lanza,*299 AD2d 649, 650-651 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 540, 563 [2003]; *People v Martinez,*151 AD2d 965 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 814 [1989]).

We reject defendant’s contention that the confidential informant was an accomplice as a matter of law. An informant acting as an agent of the police without the intent to commit a crime is not an accomplice whose testimony requires corroboration *(see People v Tillman,*289 AD2d 1006, 1007 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 734 [2002]; *People v Cleveland,*273 AD2d 787, 788 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 864 [2000]). Contrary to defendant’s further contentions, the court’s prompt curative instruction cured any *Molineux*error with respect to testimony concerning prior uncharged crimes *(see People v Robinson,*309 *1425AD2d 1228 [2003]; *People v Saracina,*298 AD2d 953, 954 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 564 [2002]; *People v Panepinto,*161 AD2d 1192 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 862 [1990]), and the court’s *Sandoval*ruling does not constitute an abuse of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203, 208 [2002]; *People v Beckwith,*309 AD2d 1253 [2003]). We see no reason to reduce the sentence in the interest of justice. Finally, we have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Hurlbutt and Kehoe, JJ.
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Natural Gas LNG Imports from Egypt (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Freeport, TX Natural Gas LNG Imports from Egypt (Nominal Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | --     | 4.24  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | 12.23  | --     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 232 (Monday, December 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 71669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29223]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2013, Through December 
31, 2013

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2013, 
through December 31, 2013, will remain at 25 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-
sensitive employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicky Dunne, Office of Aerospace 
Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Policy Branch (AAM-820), 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 806, 
Washington, DC 20591; Telephone (202) 267-8442.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR 120.109(b), the FAA Administrator's 
decision on whether to change the minimum annual random drug testing 
rate is based on the reported random drug test positive rate for the 
entire aviation industry. If the reported random drug test positive 
rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator may continue the minimum 
random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2011, the random drug test positive 
rate was 0.462%. Therefore, the minimum random drug testing rate will 
remain at 25% for calendar year 2013.
    Similarly, 14 CFR 120.217(c), requires the decision on the minimum 
annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the random alcohol 
test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less than 0.50%, the 
Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol testing rate at 
10%. In 2011, the random alcohol test violation rate was 0.097%. 
Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will remain at 10% 
for calendar year 2013.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual 
random testing percentage rates are determined please refer to the Code 
of Federal Regulations Title 14, Sec. Sec.  120.109(b) (for drug 
testing), and 120.217(c) (for alcohol testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 1, 2012.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 2012-29223 Filed 11-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ THEODORE STALICK                
|                       |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President and
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer             

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morton Industrial Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Rodney B. Harrison, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Rodney B. Harrison

Rodney B. Harrison
Vice President of Finance
August 11, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-87,964-03

EX PARTE JAMES HALSELL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2015-CR-7747-W3 IN THE 437TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pled nolo contendere in an open plea to Count II- MoneyLaundering $20k-$100K;

Count IV - Money Laundering $20k-$100K; Count VI- Forgery; Count VII- Forgery; Count VIIIForgery; and Count IX- Securing the Execution of a Document by Deception over $200K and was

found guilty and sentenced to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division for

three (3) years confinement in Count II; three (3) years confinement in Count IV; one (l) year

confinement in Count VI; one (I) year confinement in Count VII; one (I) year confinement in Count

VIII; and five (5) years confinement in Count IX. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.

Halsell v. State, No. 04-17-00206-CR (Tex. App. —San Antonio, June 14, 2017). Applicant filed
2

this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

After a review of the record, we find that Applicant’s claims that the Texas Board of

Pardons and Parole violated due process by denying him parole are without merit. Therefore,

we deny relief.

Applicant’s remaining claims challenging his conviction on the grounds of false

statements or allegations in Count IX, and the qualifications of Count IX as a felony are

dismissed pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. Art. 11.07 §4.

Delivered: October 7, 2020

Do not publish