alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA 

Calendar No. 34 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 37 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Received; read the first time 

APRIL 13, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission with respect to regulating the Internet 

and broadband industry practices. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Fed4 eral Communications Commission relating to the matter 

5 of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry 

6 practices (Report and Order FCC 10–201, adopted by the 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 37 PCS 

1 Commission on December 21, 2010), and such rule shall 

2 have no force or effect. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 34 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 37 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal 

practices. ulating the Internet and broadband industry Communications Commission with respect to regAPRIL 13, 2011 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                                   MEDEX, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                         1996             1995
                                         ----             ----
<S>                                  <C>             <C>
PRIMARY:
Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding                   6,200,872        6,161,025
Common Equivalent Shares -
  Stock Options                          157,069 (1)       37,128 (1)
                                      ----------       ----------
Common Shares and Common
  Equivalent Shares Outstanding        6,357,941        6,198,153
                                      ==========       ==========
NET INCOME                            $2,713,798       $1,137,069
                                      ==========       ==========
NET INCOME PER SHARE                  $     0.43       $     0.18
                                      ==========       ==========


FULLY DILUTED:
Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding                   6,200,872        6,161,025
Common Equivalent Shares -
  Stock Options                          235,202 (1)       37,160 (1)
                                      ----------       ----------
Common Shares and Common
  Equivalent Shares Outstanding        6,436,074        6,198,185
                                      ==========       ==========
NET INCOME                            $2,713,798       $1,137,069
                                      ==========       ==========
NET INCOME PER SHARE                  $     0.42            $0.18
                                      ==========       ==========
</TABLE>

(1)      Calculated under the Treasury Stock Method using the average price or
         period-end market price of Medex stock, as applicable.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Alaska Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Alaska Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.70   | 0.72   | 0.82   | 0.87   | 0.84   | 0.90   | 0.91  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.83   | 0.52   | 0.50   | 0.54   | 0.59   | 0.56   | 0.65   | 0.62   | 0.54   | 0.53  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.51   | 0.61   | 0.69   | 0.57   | 0.52   | 0.58   | 0.51   | 0.49   | 0.41   | 0.41  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.53   | 0.51   | 0.46   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
ex10-11.htm


EXHIBIT 10.11







PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED TO MMC MINES, INC. DATED MARCH 9, 2012


 



	Principal Amount: $10,000.00	Issue Date: March 9, 2012





 


 PROMISSORY NOTE







This Promissory Note Payable on Demand (the “Note”) is made and effective March 9, 2012,







                         




 



	BETWEEN:	MMC Mines, Inc.
	 	 
	 AND:	American Sierra Gold Corp. (the “Borrower”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, with its head office located at:
	 	1420 5th Ave Ste 2200
	 	Seattle, WA 98101





 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Borrower promises to pay to the order of Holder, the sum of Ten thousand  U.S. Dollars ($10,000), together with interest of six percent (6%) per annum on the unpaid balance. The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of Holder thereof.







Upon default in making payment within 30 days of demand, and provide this note is turned over for collection, Borrower agrees to pay all reasonable legal fees and costs of collection to the extent permitted by law. This Note shall take effect as a sealed instrument and be enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. All parties to this note waive presentment, notice of non-payment, protest and notice of protest, and agree to remain fully bound notwithstanding the release of any party, extension of modification of terms, or discharge of any collateral for this note.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused the Note to duly executed as of the date first written above.







BORROWER


American Sierra Gold Corp.







/s/ James Vandeberg                               







James Vandeberg


Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Maine Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Maine Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 808    | 1,164  | 877    | 859    | 658    | 585    | 494    | 753    | 943    | 837   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,753  | 2,399  | 762    | 844    | 1,307  | 999    | 652    | 679    | 821    | 1,168 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 932    | 1,836  | 1,884  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William H. Jones, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[767 NYS2d 678]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 7, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a subway conductor for the New York City Transit Authority after he failed to report for three mandatory overtime work assignments. Claimant was aware that the contract between the employer and his union provided that members might be required to work a certain number of overtime hours, even if they occurred on scheduled days off. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he had lost his employment due to disqualifying misconduct. Claimant appeals.

*948This Court has held that the refusal to accept reasonable overtime work assignments, especially when the claimant has been made aware that such assignments are part of the job, may rise to the level of disqualifying misconduct (see *Matter of Legault [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 795 [2001]; *Matter of Mack [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 828 [1999]). On the record before us, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant lost his job due to disqualifying misconduct. Although claimant averred that he was physically unable to work more than five consecutive days due to severe migraine headaches caused by the polluted air in the subway system, this assertion was not substantiated by medical evidence and, accordingly, does not warrant a contrary outcome *(see Matter of Klein [Commissioner of Labor],*304 AD2d 897 [2003]; *Matter of Harpule [Sweeney],*241 AD2d 610 [1997]). The remaining contentions raised by claimant have been reviewed and found to be unpersuasive.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### State v. Thomas

110,448

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                            
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                                      
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Montana Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Montana Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0.12   | 0.11   | 0.11  
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0.11   | 0.12   | 0.17   | 0.21   | 0.23   | 0.42   | 0.46   | 0.73   | 0.83   | 1.16  
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1.29   | 1.90   | 2.87   | 3.00   | 3.04   | 2.51   | 2.28   | 1.86   | 1.65   | 1.57  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1.75   | 1.76   | 1.63   | 2.15   | 1.53   | 1.16   | 1.44   | 1.77   | 1.72   | 2.12  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2.96   | 2.48   | NA     | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No . 1 8 -2 2 50

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ju an Gu s t av o To rres -Perez l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l Pet i t i o n er

v . W i l l iam P. Barr, At t o rn ey

Gen eral o f Un it edSt at es l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll Res

po n den t

_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Pet i t i o n fo r Rev i ew o f an Ord er o f t h e Bo ard o f Imm ig rat i on Ap peal s

_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sub m it t ed : M ay

7 , 2 0 19 Fi led : J u n e 2 7, 2 0 19 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re ERICKSON, BOW M AN, an dGRASZ, Ci rcu i t J ud g es .

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ PER CURIAM

.
M ex i can ci t i zen J u an Gu s t av o To rres -Perez p et i t i o n s fo r rev i ew of an o rd er o f t h e Bo ard o f Im

m i g rat i o n Ap p eal s d i s m i s s i n g h i s ap p eal fro m t he d eci si on o f an i m m i g rat i o n ju d g e d en y i n g as y l u m , w i t h h o l di n g o f rem o v a l , a n d rel i ef u n d er t h e Co n v en ti o n A g ai n s t T o rtu re. A ft er carefu l co n s i d erat i o n o f th e p et i t i o n , we fi n d n o b a s i s fo r rev ers al

. See 8 U .S.C. § 1 15 8 (b )(1 ) (as y l u m el i g i b il i ty req u i rem en t s ) ;Ga r ci a -Mi li a n v. Lyn ch , 8 25 F.3 d 94 3 , 9 4 5 (8 t h C i r . 2 0 1 6 ) (s t an dard o f rev i ew).

Acco rd in g ly , t h e p et i t io n i s d en i ed

. S ee 8 t h Ci r. R. 4 7B.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

-2

-
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRESIDENT AND


THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SensiVida Medical Technologies, Inc.,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jose Mir, and I, Frank D. Benick, certify, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d));
    and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





February
      16, 2011
              /s/ Jose MirJose
      MirPresidentFebruary
      16, 2011
              /s/ Frank D. BenickFrank
      D. BenickChief
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished in accordance with Securities and
Exchange Commission Release Nos. 34-47551 and 34-47986 and shall not be
considered “filed” as part of this 10-Q/A.





This
certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Ogilby, CA Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Ogilby, CA Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | NA     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA      | NA      | 11,450  | 50,797  | 75,950  | 85,815  | 95,710  | 91,539  | 103,540 | 95,394 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 36,683  | 87,259  | 103,050 | 99,468  | 112,077 | 115,615 | 115,228 | 108,218 | 122,836 | 122,203
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 110,790 | 127,468 | 121,907 | 119,186 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1045 

For the relief of the survivors of Michael T. Theodore, Jr., Joshua A. 

Sherbourne, and Zachary A. Nolen. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2011 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

For the relief of the survivors of Michael T. Theodore, Jr., 

Joshua A. Sherbourne, and Zachary A. Nolen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) Michael T. Theodore, Jr., Joshua A. 

6 Sherbourne, and Zachary A. Nolen had each passed 

7 the required mental, moral, and physical examina8 tions of the Marine Corps and were hours away from 

9 being sworn in as members of the Marine Corps at 

10 the time of their deaths. 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1045 IH

1 (2) On March 31, 2010, in Warren Township, 

2 Ohio, each of these men was present in a govern3 ment-owned vehicle driven by their recruiter, Marine 

4 Sergeant Charles Keene, that was struck from be5 hind by Donald P. Williams. 

6 (3) Each of these men died as a result of the 

7 accident, and Donald P. Williams faces aggravated 

8 vehicular homicide charges in their deaths. 

9 (4) But for the tragic motor vehicle accident 

10 that occurred on March 31, 2010, each of these men 

11 would have been sworn in as members of the Marine 

12 Corps on April 1, 2010, in Cleveland, Ohio. 

13 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF LIFE INSURANCE UNDER 

14 SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE. 

15 For the purposes of subchapter III of chapter 19 of 

16 title 38, United States Code, Michael T. Theodore, Jr., 

17 Joshua A. Sherbourne, and Zachary A. Nolen shall each 

18 be deemed to have been a member of a uniformed service 

19 on active duty and insured under such subchapter at the 

20 time of their deaths on March 31, 2010. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS