alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1578

___________

Scott Reel, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security Administration, *

*

Appellee, *

___________

Submitted: September 7, 2011

Filed: September 9, 2011

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Scott Reel appeals from the order of the District Court affirming the denial of 1

disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After de novo

review, see Van Vickle v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 825, 828 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude

that Reel failed to meet his burden of proving that his alcoholism was not a

The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court

1

for the Eastern District of Missouri. 
contributing factor material to the Commissioner’s determination that he is disabled,

see Kluesner v. Astrue, 607 F.3d 533, 537 (8th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm. 

2

______________________________

We decline to address the issues that Reel has not adequately developed on 2

appeal. See Meyers v. Starke, 420 F.3d 738, 743 (8th Cir. 2005). 

-2-
#### Roland Daniel DETOUCHE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2491

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge.

Affirmed.
223PA16

#### North Carolina Department of Public Safety v. Chauncey John Ledford

Petitioner’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal

Allowed 04/03/2017
070PA16-2

#### State v. Nicolas Olivares Pineda

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-800-2)

Denied
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 31,835 | 48,993
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 59,514 | 64,765 | 61,348 | 58,654 | 57,140 | 57,440 | 58,515 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 51,198 | 51,631 | 53,043 | 56,830 | 59,294 | 64,100 | 64,588 | 63,952 | 65,307 | 65,440
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 64,892 | 61,299 | 61,654 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6326.

#### Smith *v.*Virginia.

Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
#### Antonio Jermaine PRESLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D15-4678

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 12, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie *1028County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF003812A. •

*Affirmed.*
#### Mikel Chanika MIMS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0864

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 11, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-29264

Denied.
#### COM. v. WRIGHT, T.

2730 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/02/2017

CP-39-CR-0005096-2015

(Lehigh)

Affirmed
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00524-CV

Janet THOME,

Appellant

v.

GUADALUPE- BLANCO RIVER AUTHORITY,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-1094-CV-A

Honorable Jan P. Patterson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

court for this appeal are taxed against Appellant Janet Thome.

SIGNED July 20, 2022.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1176 

To amend the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 to include farmed 

shellfish as specialty crops. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. DELAURO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 

to include farmed shellfish as specialty crops. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shellfish Marketing 

5 Assistance Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FARMED SHELLFISH AS SPECIALTY CROPS. 

7 Section 3(1) of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness 

8 Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–465; 7 U.S.C. 1621 note) 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1176 IH

1 is amended by inserting ‘‘farmed shellfish,’’ after 

2 ‘‘fruits,’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 9 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 9

  Commemorating 90 years of U.S.-Polish diplomatic relations, during 
 which Poland has proven to be an exceptionally strong partner to the 
          United States in advancing freedom around the world.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2009

 Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. 
    Specter, Mr. Kaufman, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. DeMint, and Mr. Durbin) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

                             March 31, 2009

                Reported by Mr. Kerry, without amendment

                             April 1, 2009

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating 90 years of U.S.-Polish diplomatic relations, during 
 which Poland has proven to be an exceptionally strong partner to the 
          United States in advancing freedom around the world.

Whereas the United States established diplomatic relations with the newly formed 
        Polish Republic in April 1919;
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 20th anniversary of democracy in Poland, as well 
        as the 20th anniversary of the fall of communism in Poland;
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 10th anniversary of Poland's accession to the 
        North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO);
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 50th anniversary of the Fulbright Educational 
        Exchange Program in Poland;
Whereas Poland has overcome a legacy of foreign occupation and period of 
        communist rule to emerge as a free and democratic nation;
Whereas Poland has strongly supported the United States diplomatically and 
        militarily, as well as supporting United States-led efforts in combating 
        global terrorism, and has contributed troops to the coalitions led by 
        the United States in both Afghanistan and Iraq; and
Whereas Poland has cooperated closely with the United States on issues such as 
        democratization, nuclear proliferation, human rights, regional 
        cooperation in Eastern Europe, and reform of the United Nations: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates the 90th anniversary of U.S.-Polish 
        diplomatic relations;
            (2) congratulates the Polish people on their great 
        accomplishments as a free democracy; and
            (3) expresses appreciation for Poland's steadfast 
        partnership with the United States.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                               
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Florida Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Florida Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.3   | 99.3   | 99.4   | 99.3   | 99.3   | 99.3   | 99.2   | 99.2   | 1.0    | 99.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 99.2   | 99.2   | 99.2   | 98.4   | 98.3   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 98.0   | 97.7   | 97.8   | 97.8   | 91.7   | 91.7   | 91.3   | 91.7   | 91.3  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 92.1   | 92.2   | 92.2   | 94.0   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
January 24, 2017 STATE OFMINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT ADM10-8008
ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES FORADMISSION TO THE BAR 

# fl

ORU:EOF AJII!IB.I!A'IECOlln ·

The Minnesota State Board of Law Examiners filed a petition proposmg amendments to the Rules for Admission to the Bar. The court opened a public comment period. TheMinnesotaStateBarAssociationand SuzulaBidonfiled commentssupporting the Board's proposed amendment to Rule 10, but opposing the proposed amendment to Rule 16. The cout1 has considered the petition, the Board of Law Examiner's recommendations, and the comments. Basedupon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached amendments to the Rules for Admission to the Barbe, and the same are, prescribed and promulgatedto be effective as ofJuly 1, 2017. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED thatthe comments filed by the Minnesota State Bar Association and Suzula Bidon are referred to the State Board of Law Examiners for consideration and further response as deemed necessary by the Board. Dated: January 24, 2017 BYTHE COURT:

Lorie S. Gildea ChiefJusticeRULE 10. ADMISSION BY HOUSE COUNSEL LICENSE 

### * * * * B. Eligibility. A lawyer licensed in another jurisdiction or the holder of a temporary house counsel license issued pursuant to Rule 9B and 9C, who intends to practice in Minnesota for more than 12 months, may apply for a house counsel license when the lawyer:



### * * * *(1) Is employed in Minnesota as house counsel solely for a single corporation (or its subsidiaries), associatiOn, business, or governmental entitywhose lawful business consists ofactivities other than the practice oflaw orthe provision oflegal services; (2) Has practiced law by engaging in one or more ofthe activities listed in Rule 7 A for at least 36 ofthe previous 60 months; and (3) Complieswiththe eligibilityprovisions ofRule 4A(l), (2), (3)(a), (4), (5), and (6).

RULE 16. CONDITIONAL ADMISSION 

### * * * * E. Length of Conditional Period. The initial conditional admission period shall not exceed 60 months, unless a complaint for a violation ofthe consent agreement or a complaint ofunprofessional conduct has been filed with the OLPR. The filing of any complaint with the OLPR shall extend the conditional admission until disposition ofthe complaint by the OLPR. 

### * * * *
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Ohio Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Ohio Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 37,513  | 66,621 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 67,335  | 92,037  | 94,694  | 106,985 | 109,832 | 112,529 | 117,766 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 175,725 | 182,770 | 216,485 | 233,115 | 232,723 | 233,369 | 235,860 | 237,419 | 238,690 | 239,333
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 240,429 | 236,594 | 233,469 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
##### 



Term of Employment; Executive Representation.
 Employment Term
 Executive Representation.
 Position; Place of Performance.




---



##### 



Compensation.
      Business Expenses




---



##### 



Benefits; Vacation
 Termination
 By the Company For Cause; By Executive for any Reason (other than Good Reason); Expiration
of the Employment Term




---



##### 



(a)
    
    the Base Salary through the date of termination;(b)
    
    any Annual Bonus earned but unpaid as of the date of termination(c)
    
    for any previously completed full calendar year;(d)
    
    any vacation days earned but unpaid as of the termination date(e)
    
    for previously completed calendar year;(f)
    
    any vacation days earned but not taken; and(g)
    
    reimbursement for any unreimbursed business expenses properly
incurred by Executive in accordance with Company policy prior to the date of
Executives termination.




---



##### 



Good Reason
 
 Disability or Death.




---



##### 



By the Company Without Cause
  (i)
    
    the Accrued Obligations; and(ii)
    
    continuation of the Executives then-current Base Salary for twelve months.
  (i)
    
    the Accrued Obligations;(ii)
    
    continuation of the Executives then-current base salary for one
year, payable in one lump sum no later than 30 days following such termination
date; and(iii)
    
    all options and restricted stock granted to the Executive shall
become immediately accelerated and fully exercisable.




---



##### 



Notice of Termination
 Confidentiality/Non-Competition




---



##### 








---



##### 



Specific Performance
 Indemnification
 Miscellaneous.
 Governing Law
 Entire Agreement/Amendments
 No Waiver
 Severability
 Binding Agreement; Assignment




---



##### 



Notice
 
  Withholding Taxes
 Survival
 Counterpart
  V. Marc Droppert
    
    
    
    Omrix Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ V. Marc Droppert
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Robert Taub
Summary of 2012 Executive Officer Compensation



 Exhibit 10.22 
 Summary of 2012 Executive Officer Compensation 
 The
following shows the annual salary for each of Mattersight’s current executive officers: 
  

					
	 Kelly D. Conway, President and Chief Executive Officer:
	  	$	300,000	  
	 Karen Bolton, Executive Vice President of Client Management:
	  	$	250,000	  
	 Christine R. Carsen, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary:
	  	$	190,000	  
	 Christopher J. Danson, Executive Vice President of Delivery:
	  	$	275,000	  
	 David R. Gustafson, Vice President of Marketing and Product Management:
	  	$	230,000	  
	 William B. Noon, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
	  	$	200,000	  

 Mr. Conway, Ms. Bolton, and Mr. Danson have target bonus percentages as
set forth in their employment agreements with Mattersight. Additional information concerning the compensation of these executive officers is set forth in the Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed by Mattersight Corporation with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
**Exhibit 23.1**

November 3, 2006 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, CA 

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-62228, 333-01583 and 333-125460 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated November 3, 2006 related to our review of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independentregistered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California
No. 12-6687.

#### Deane *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Dorsey*v. *United States,*567 U. S. 260 (2012).
No. 12-303.

#### Wen Xuan *v.*On Tai.

App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
#### P.O., the Father, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0839

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 18, 2017

L.T. NO.: 16-16064

Denied.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

MAD DOGG ATHLETICS, INC., Appellant

v.

PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., Appellee

______________________

2023

- 2018, 2023

- 2020

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2022

- 00016 and IPR2022

- 00017.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. ’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss these appeals pursuant to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure

,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted. The appeals are dismissed.

(2) All other pending motions are denied as moot. Case: 23-2018 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2023MAD DOGG ATHLETICS

, INC

. v. PELOTON INTERACTIVE

, INC

. 2

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Novem ber 21 , 2023

Date F OR THE C OURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 21, 2023 Case: 23-2018 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2023