alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Illinois Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Illinois Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 430    | 473    | 542   
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 526    | 407    | 308    | 246    | 102    | 102    | 110    | 112    | 131    | 393   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 385    | 17     | 5,586  | 4,873  | 4,426  | 4,237  | 3,998  | 3,425  | 62     | 52    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 131    | 142    | 107    | 116    | 111    | 97     | 82     | 86     | 89     |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOUGLAS GORMAN
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3351

[ May 10, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael A. Usan

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 11979CF10A

.

Ashley D. Kay, Fort Lauderdale and Kevin J. Kulik, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ERBER
, C.J., G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., co ncur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.9   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1213 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1213

     To repeal mandatory funding provided to States in the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act to establish American Health Benefit 
                               Exchanges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2011

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To repeal mandatory funding provided to States in the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act to establish American Health Benefit 
                               Exchanges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEALING MANDATORY FUNDING TO STATES TO ESTABLISH AMERICAN 
              HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1311(a) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 13031(a)) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
under such section 1311(a), the unobligated balance is rescinded.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

COpy r

INFü 7011R

MAY 172010

Dr. Donald F. Schwartz, MD, MPH

Deputy Mayor, Health and Opportunity Health Commissioner

Philadelphia Department of Public Health

1401 JFK Boulevard, Room 600

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Dear Dr. Schwartz:

By letter and enclosures dated April 9, 2010, Philadelphia Air Management Services

(AMS) submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — Region III (EPA) a data

substitution package for the Northeast Airport ambient air ozone monitoring site (AIRS ID# 42-

101-0024) in accordance with the regulatory requirements of 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix I. 2.3(b)

— National Primary and Secondary Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix I

2.3 (b) requires:

.When computing whether the minimum data completeness requirements have been

met, meteorological or ambient data maybe sufficient to demonstrate that meteorological

conditions on missing days were not conducive to concentrations above the level of the

standard. Missing days assumed less then the level ofthe standard are counted for the

purpose of meeting the. minimum data completeness requirement, subject to the approval

ofthe appropriate Regional Administrator.”

The AMS data substitution package contained documentation and analysis showing that

meteorological conditions for the missing days was not conducive to forming elevated

concentrations of ground-level ozone which would have exceeded the 8-hour ozone standard of

0.O75ppm. This was substantiated by AMS providing information showing reported ozone

concentrations at nearby monitoring sites well below the 8-hour ozone standard for the missing

days. Based on our review, EPA hereby approves AMS’s request to allow missing ambient air

ozone concentrations for the following days of September and October in 2009 be counted when

calculating yearly data completeness requirements of the CFR:
{ Dates Day Count

9/16/09—9/17/09 2

9/19/09 ) I

9/26/09 - 1

9/29/09 — 10/2/09 4.

10/4/09— 10/8/09 5

10/11/09 —10/26/09 16

TOTAL 29

If you have any questions regarding this approval action, please feel free to contact

Mr. David Arnold, Acting Director; Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-2172 or

Mr. Walter K. Wilkie, Associate Director ofthe Office of Air Monitoring and Analysis, at (215)

814- 2150.

cc: Ms. Joyce Epps

Director, PADEP

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

Regional Admini
No. 12-6606.

#### McClain *v.*Davis, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6277.

#### Gutierrez-Diaz *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11159]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of he Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Ocean's Freight, Inc., 4210 N.W. 35th Court, Miami, FL 33142, Officer: 
Luis Miguel Boscan, President.

    Dated: April 22, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11159 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R I C HA R D H UT AU R UK , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73989 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 020- 270 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R i c har d H ut auruk, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED JU L 11 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73989 2 an ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d9 8 8 , 9 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng H ut auruk’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erfour ye ar s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nal order, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and H ut auruk f a i l e d t o pr e s e nts uf

f i c i e nte vi de nc e of c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s i n I ndone s i at o qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the tim e lim it f

o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; N ajm abadi v. H older , 5 9 7 F .3 d9 8 3 , 9 8 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) ( e v id e n c e s up p o rtin g am o tio n to re op en m ustbe “ qu al i t at i vel y di ff er ent ” f rom w hatw as pres ent ed atthe i ni t i al h e ar in g ) . W e r e

je c t H u tau ru k ’s c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A ’s an a ly s is w a s in a d e q u a te . Se e N ajm abadi , 5 9 7 F .3 da t 9 9 0 ( “[ t]h e [ B I A ] d o e s n o t h a v e to w r ite an e x e g e s is o n e v e ryc o n te n tio n ” ) ( in te rn a l q u o te s o m itte d ) . F i na l l y , i n l i ghtof

ourc onc l us i ons i n H

utau ruk v . Mukasey , 302 F e d. A ppx. 695, 696 ( 9th C i r . D e c . 3, 2008) , the B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the m ot i on t o r e ope n t o appl yourde c i s i ons i n W akkaryv. H

older , 558 F . 3d 1049 ( 9th C i r . 2009) , and T

am pu bo lon v. H

older , 6 1 0 F .3 d1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Gretten BARZAGA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Lissette CONTRERAS, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1006

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 08, 2017

L.T. NO.: 16-16066

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jim Callaghan, certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form 10-KSB of Ancor Resources  Inc.,  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
February 28, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in  all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Ancor Resources Inc.

Date:  June 20, 2006


                                             	 /s/ Jim Callaghan
                                                 ---------------------------
                                                 Jim Callaghan
                                                 Secretary, Treasurer and
                                                 Director (Principal Financial
						 Officer and Principal
						 Accounting Officer)
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Virginia Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Virginia Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.9   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6.8    | 6.4    | 9.3    | 11.2   | 13.3   | 15.9   | 14.7   | 22.1   | 27.9   | 32.6  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 33.6   | 34.2   | 38.6   | 34.3   | 36.4   | 36.1   | 40.1   | 41.2   | 40.9   | 42.9  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 43.8   | 45.9   | 47.9   | 45.4   | 44.2   | 46.0   | 48.3   | 48.7   | 47.7   | 48.8  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 49.8   | 47.5   | 46.2   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Termination Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5.1 
 TERMINATION AGREEMENT 
 THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this
“Agreement”), dated as of March 8, 2012 is made and entered into by and among Global Income Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), CNL Global Income Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
“Advisor”), and CNL Capital Markets, Inc., a Florida corporation (“CCM”). 
 RECITALS:

 WHEREAS, the Company, the Advisor and CCM entered into that certain Amended and Restated Service Agreement dated
January 20, 2010 (the “Current Service Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and CCM have determined to
replace the Current Service Agreement with a new Service Agreement between the Company and CCM as a result of, among other things, DST Systems, Inc, becoming the Company’s new transfer agent and a desire by the Company and CCM to streamline the
process of the calculation of fees to be paid CCM for its services (the “New Service Agreement”); and 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, of the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Company, the Advisor and CCM
agree as follows: 
 1.      Termination of Current Service Agreement. Each of the Company,
the Advisor and CCM agrees to the termination of the Current Service Agreement, which termination shall be effective on the Effective Date of the New Service Agreement to be entered into by Company and CCM. The term “Effective Date” shall
have the same meaning as stated in the preamble paragraph of the New Service Agreement. 
 2.
     Miscellaneous. 
 2.1      Promptly upon request of any other
party, each party hereto shall each execute and deliver such further assurances and take such further actions as may be reasonably required or appropriate to evidence the termination of the Current Service Agreement and otherwise carry out the
intent and purpose of this Agreement. 
 2.2      This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts which, when taken together, shall constitute a single binding instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written. 
  

					
	GLOBAL INCOME TRUST, INC.	 	
			
	By:	 	     /s/ Steven D. Shackelford
	 	
		 	Name:  Steven D. Shackelford	 	
		 	Title:    Chief Financial Officer	 	
	
	CNL GLOBAL INCOME ADVISORS, LLC
			
	By:	 	     /s/ Steven D. Shackelford
	 	
		 	Name:  Steven D. Shackelford	 	
		 	Title:    Chief Financial Officer	 	
	
	CNL CAPITAL MARKETS CORP.
			
	By:	 	     /s/ Jeffrey R. Shafer
	 	
		 	Name:  Jeffrey R. Shafer	 	
		 	Title:    President
#### COM. v. BROWN, F.

3503 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/10/2017

CP-51-CR-0009721-2013 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed