alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1059 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1059

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the 
Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their 
         financial disclosure reports, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REDACTION AUTHORITY CONCERNING SENSITIVE 
              SECURITY INFORMATION.

    Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 
App.) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``Marshall'' and 
        inserting ``Marshals''; and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (E).

            Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1059

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the 
Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their 
         financial disclosure reports, and for other purposes.
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 12, 2021

NO. 03-20-00546-CR

Ex parte Edward Johnson, Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11804]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-121755-97]
RIN 1545-AV86


Reorganizations; Nonqualified Preferred Stock; Hearing 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on notice of proposed 
regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations relating to the receipt of nonqualified 
preferred stock in certain exchanges.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for Tuesday, May 5, 
1998, beginning at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaNita Van Dyke of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), 202) 622-7190, (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is under 
section 356(e) of the Internal Revenue Code. A notice of proposed 
rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations and notice of 
public hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Tuesday, January 6, 
1998 (63 FR 453), announced that the public hearing on the proposed 
rulemaking would be held on Tuesday, May 5, 1998, beginning at 10:00 
a.m., in Room 2615, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington DC.
    The public hearing scheduled for Tuesday, May 5, 1998, is 
cancelled.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel, (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 98-11804 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2013-0520

Docket Number

2013-SW-027-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Metro Aviation Alert Service Bulletin No. MA145-21A-003, Revision A, dated April 26, 

2013.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
124A16

#### Jillian Murray v. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

1. Def’s Motion for Judicial Notice (COAl5-375)

2. State’s Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel

i.

2. Allowed 12/08/2016
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-56-002]


Duquesne Light Company; Notice of Filing

April 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on March 30, 1998, Duquesne Light Company tendered 
for filing its compliance filing in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 1998. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11298 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearin g.

________________ No. 3D18-1364 Lower Tribunal No. 18-138B

________________ 

### C.Y., a juvenile, Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Willia m Johnson, Senior Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jeffrey Paul DeSousa, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Doming uez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ., and LUCK, Associate Judge.
PER CURIAM.2 C.Y., a juvenile, appeals from the trial court’s adjudicatory order, which found him delinquent of battery and of the lesser-included offense of misdemeanor assault. The order lists the assault count as a first-degree misdemeanor . C.Y. argues that the order is incorrect because assault is a second degree misdemean or. The State agrees.
See § 784.011(2), Fla. Stat. (2018) (“Whoever commits an assault sha ll be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree . . . .”). Because simple a ssault is a seconddegree misdemeanor and not a first-degree misdemeanor, we affir m but remand for correction of the adjudicatory order. See Malone v. State, 225 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (affirming but remanding solely to correct the degree of the offense); Carrillo v. State, 865 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (same). Affirmed with instructions.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Liquefied U.S. Natural Gas Exports to Mexico (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0       | 33      | 275    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 418    | 465    | 403    | 376    | 368    | 242    | 173    | 87      | 53      | 84     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 208    | 236    | 153    | 2,852  | 181    | 195    | 27,845 | 141,434 | 182,834 | 144,476
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 35,230 | 16,450 | 5,383  | 14,265 |        |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

HUNG NGUYEN , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 16

- 0828 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2007

- 145984

- 001 The Honorable Connie Contes , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney's Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent
Hung Nguyen , Buckeye Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Judge Margaret H. Downie delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 10-10-2017STATE v. NGUYEN Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Hung Nguyen seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a pet ition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 53 7, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that pet itioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, w e grant review and deny relief.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|New Mexico Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|New Mexico Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 61,772 | 52,424 | 48,570
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 45,850 | 45,512 | 41,611 | 29,268 | 27,112 | 19,663 | 17,462 | 13,441 | 13,481 | 11,624
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8,597  | 7,067  | 7,467  | 8,782  | 8,561  | 8,640  | 8,416  | 8,723  | 9,903  | 12,192
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12,876 | 10,730 | 11,495 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
In the matter of: BRIAN WALLAESA BRIAN A WALLAESA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FDMS No. FAA-201O-0628 Case No. 2010WP190018 Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

### -------------------------) Motion to Dismiss Complaint file July 28.2010**~** CS u? 

### CJ 

# '" o

Pursuant to section 13.208 ofthe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA,
or Complainant) Rules ofPracticein Civil Penalty Proceeding, 14 C.F.R. § 13.208, the Respondent files this Motion to Deem that Each Allegation Dismissed, and in support thereofstates as follows: 1. The Administratorfiled the Complaint in this case on July 28,2010, and pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.208(a), "The agency attorney shall file the original and one copy ofthe complaint with the hearing docket clerk
... not laterthan 20 days afterreceipt by the agency attorney ofa request for
a hearing." 2. That the Complainant has stated that the request for a hearing was received on July 14,2010. 3. Thatthe Complainanthad filed the Complaint on July 28,2010. 4. That counsel for the Complainanthad notice from the Respondent ofthe Respondent's intent to request a hearing through informal conversation prior to the submission ofthe Final Notice ofProposed Civil penalty.WHEREFORE, the Respondentrespectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge enter an orderdeeming each allegation dismissed as the Complaint was not filed in the time allotted as per 14 C.F.R. § 13.208.

Dated September 17, 2010 11272 Wortham Crest Circle Manassas, VA 20109 (570) 778-1335
No. 12-6887.

#### Moore *v.*Hollingsworth, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
049P17

#### William G. Larsen and Robert Stephen Allen v. The Arlington Condominium Owners Association, Inc. and Arlington Residential Holdings, LLC

Def’s (The Arlington Condominium Owners Association, Inc.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-618)

Denied
# C_2019157EN.01001001.xml

| 8.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/Parts Point Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 157/02)

On 29 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9340. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9340. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11573]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-131-001]

Sumas International Pipeline Inc., Notice of Compliance Filing

April 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 17, 1998, Sumas International Pipeline 
Inc. (SIPI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to the 
filing, to become effective April 1, 1998.
    SIPI asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
Order No. 587 issued on July 17, 1996; the Notice Clarifying Procedures 
for Filing Tariff Sheets issued on September 12, 1996, in Docket No. 
RM96-1-000; and the Commission's direction of 30 March 1998 in Docket 
No. RP98-131-000 to correct pagination errors on certain tariff sheets 
and to revise tariff language to incorporate Gas Industry Standards 
Board (GISB) Standards 1.3.2 and 3.3.4 verbatim.
    SIPI states that copies of this filing were mailed to all customers 
of SIPI and Interested Parties.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11573 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
414P16

#### State v. Brenda Sanders Lanclos

Def's PDR Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-122)

Denied
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Ohio Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Ohio Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7 | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |        | 220,563 | 199,481
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 202,226 | 177,290 | 176,466 | 164,218 | 162,613 | 165,238 | 152,786 |        |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92,621  | 85,877  | 51,308  | 35,966  | 37,035  | 36,612  | 31,526  | 30,551 | 29,856  | 30,008 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 30,909  | 36,753  | 33,263  |         |         |         |         |        |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024