alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|North Dakota Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|North Dakota Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 66     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 11     | 5      | 3      | 5      | 5      | 488   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,272  | 1,045  | 669    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
341P12-4

#### State v. Donald Durr ant Farrow

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP16-888)

2. Def s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed

Ervin, J., recused
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                     
|No chart available.                                                     
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Warroad, MN Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus ALANDIOUS T. FELDMAN, a/k/a Tony Rony, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CR-00- 242-AMD; CA-02-1686-AMD) Submitted: February 25, 2004 Decided: March 11, 2004 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alandious T. Feldman, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Lynne Ann Battaglia, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alandious T. Feldman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Feldman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Feldman’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny as moot Feldman’s motion to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s ruling on his motion for reconsideration in light of the district court’s recent denial of reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Order filed January 30, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00477-CV

____________

HARMOHINDER S. BHATIA, Appellant

V.

WOODLANDS NORTH HOUSTON HEART CENTER PLLC, NORTH 

HOUSTON HEART CENTER PLLC, NORTHWEST HOUSTON 

CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING CENTER II, LTD., BACL 

INVESTMENTS LLC, VINCENT AQUINO, M.D., F.A.C.C., GARY 

GOLEMAN, M.D., F.A.C.C., BRUCE LACHTERMAN, MD, F.A.C.C., 

ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2007-09704

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Defendant's Exhibit 

5776, an audiotape.

The clerk of the 270th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of Defendant's Exhibit 5776, an audiotape, on or before 

February 15, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and 

keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of 

Defendant's Exhibit 5776, an audiotape, to the clerk of the 270th District Court.

PER CURIAM
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1173 

To repeal the CLASS program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself, Mr. GINGREY of Georgia, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. ROE

of Tennessee, Mr. PAUL, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. AKIN, and Mr. ROYCE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the CLASS program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Responsibility 

5 and Retirement Security Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF CLASS PROGRAM. 

7 (a) REPEAL.—Title XXXII of the Public Health 

8 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ll et seq.; relating to the 

9 CLASS program) is repealed. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1173 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING CHANGES.— 

2 (1) Title VIII of the Patient Protection and Af3 fordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148; 124 Stat. 

4 119, 846–847) is repealed. 

5 (2) Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended— 

7 (A) by striking paragraphs (81) and (82); 

8 (B) in paragraph (80), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

9 at the end; and 

10 (C) by redesignating paragraph (83) as 

11 paragraph (81). 

12 (3) Paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 6021(d) 

13 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

14 1396p note) are amended to read as such para15 graphs were in effect on the day before the date of 

16 the enactment of section 8002(d) of the Patient Pro17 tection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111– 

18 148). Of the funds appropriated by paragraph (3) of 

19 such section 6021(d), as amended by the Patient 

20 Protection and Affordable Care Act, the unobligated 

21 balance is rescinded. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1334

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Missouri, as the ‘‘Jerry

L. Litton United States Post Office Building’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. DANFORTH, and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe,

Missouri, as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post

Office Building’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JERRY L. LITTON UNITED

4 STATES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

5 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo6 cated at 401 South Washington Street in Chillicothe, Mis7 souri, is designated as the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States

8 Post Office Building’’.
2

•S 1334 IS

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, regulation, document, record,

3 map, or other paper of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a refer5 ence to the ‘‘Jerry L. Litton United States Post Office

6 Building’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morton Industrial Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas D. Lauerman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

/
s / Thomas D. Lauerman

Thomas
D. Lauerman
Vice President of Finance
November 4, 2002

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
Asia Entertainment & Resources Ltd.
	 	Unit 605, 6/F., East Town Building,
	 	16 Fenwick Street, Wanchai, Hong Kong
	 	香港灣仔分域街16 號東城大廈6樓605室
	 	Tel: 電話: (852) 3580 0190
	 	Fax 傳真: (852) 2110 9420


 


Date: February 16, 2012


 


To: Mr. Li Chun Ming, Raymond


 


Salary Increase for the Company’s
Executive Officers


 


Pursuant to the recommendation/approval
of the Compensation Committee dated January 18, 2012 and the subsequent endorsement/approval of the full Board of Directors of
the Company, I am pleased to advise that your monthly salary is increased to HK$125,000 which takes retrospective effect from January
2012 onwards; while all other terms and conditions of the last Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and you remain
unchanged.


 


Yours truly,


 


/s/ Leong Siak Hung, CEO


 


	 	Acknowledged and agreed by
	 	 
	 	/s/ Li Chun Ming, Raymond
	 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	 	 
	 	Dated: February 16, 2012
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1166 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain 

rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. JONES, Mr. HASTINGS

of Florida, Mr. RIVERA, Mr. ROTHMAN of New Jersey, Mr. PIERLUISI, 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. DEUTCH, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks 

5 Honored in America Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

7 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re8 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1166 IH

1 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

2 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 

3 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

4 (A) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; 

5 and 

6 (B) by inserting before the period ‘‘that 

7 was used in connection with a business or as8 sets that were confiscated unless the original 

9 owner of the mark, trade name, or commercial 

10 name, or the bonafide successor-in-interest has 

11 expressly consented’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘by a des13 ignated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

14 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub15 section (e); 

16 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol17 lowing: 

18 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

19 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

20 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

21 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

22 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan23 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

24 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

25 were confiscated.’’; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1166 IH

1 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

2 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 

3 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec4 tion, the term’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### I.M., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2198

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

October 12, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James L. Martz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2015-CJ-002932-XXXX-MB.

Affirmed.
#### RICHARD O’NEAL, Employee v. INLINE FLUID POWER, INC. & AUTOMOTIVE PARTS CO., INC., Employer, AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier

No. 261PA15

Filed 21 December 2016

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, _ N.C. App. _, 773 S.E.2d 574 (2015), affirming an opinion and award filed on 4 June 2014 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court on 10 October 2016.

*Jemigan Law Firm, by Leonard T. Jemigan, Jr., Anthony L. Lucas, and Kristina B. Thompson, for plaintiff-appellant.*

*McAngus Goudelock & Courie, by Viral V. Mehta and Carl M. Short III, for defendant-appellees.*

*Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L.P., by M. Duane Jones, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
#### Juan CASTILLO, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0508

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-11563

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 20, 2019

s1113

Order 

Clerk

November 20, 2019

159387

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159387

COA: 346866

Macomb CC: 2017-002863-FH

2017-002864-FH 

2017-002865-FH

LAVELLE WESLEY SEARCY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of July 2, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. 

On remand, that court shall address whether a prosecuting attorney’s office may 

unilaterally block an individual seeking placement in a mental health court from the 

“preadmission screening and evaluation assessment” required by MCL 600.1093(3), 

which, pursuant to subsection (3)(c) of that statute, must include “[a] mental health 

assessment, clinical in nature, and using standardized instruments that have acceptable 

reliability and validity, meeting diagnostic criteria for a serious mental illness, serious 

emotional disturbance, co-occurring disorder, or developmental disability.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
     <CIK>     0000064500
     <NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   15,494
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,029,014
<ALLOWANCES>                             53,964
<INVENTORY>                           3,416,577
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,786,423
<PP&E>                                1,789,799
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,173,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        6,873,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3,743,284
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 248
<COMMON>                                149,795
<OTHER-SE>                            2,980,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          6,873,547
<SALES>                               3,107,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      3,107,378
<CGS>                                 1,593,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         3,089,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       27,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (9,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (9,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (9,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                              (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.07)


</TABLE>
No. D-2689.

#### In re Disbarment of Ingram.

[For earlier order herein, see 567 U. S. 960.]

Disbarment entered.
#### COM. v. THOMPSON, C.

49 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/21/2017

CP-36-CR-0001017-2012

CP-36-CR-0001588-2011

(Lancaster)

Affirmed
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 KAREN GRUBB,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 32,071

5 NEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER, LLC ,

6 f/k/a New Mexico Oncology Hematology 

7 Consultants, and MIKAL SMOKER, P.A.,

8 and MIKAL SMOKER, individually,

9 Defendants-Appellees.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

11 Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge

12 James A. Mungle, P.A.

13 James A. Mungle

14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellant

16 Allen, Sheperd, Lewis, Syra & Chapman, P.A.

17 Ben M. Allen

18 Christopher R. Reed

19 Albuquerque, NM

20 for Appellee New Mexico Cancer Center

21 Hinkle, Hensley, Shanor & Martin, L.L.P.
2

1 William P. Slattery

2 Dana S. Hardy

3 Santa Fe, NM

4 for Appellee Mikal Smoker

5 MEMORANDUM OPINION

6 KENNEDY, Judge.

7 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

8 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

9 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

10 DISMISSED.

11 IT IS SO ORDERED.

12 _______________________________

13 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

14 WE CONCUR:

15 ___________________________

16 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

17 ___________________________

18 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge