alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD HUTAURUK,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73989

Agency No. A078-020-270

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 26, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Richard Hutauruk, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUL 11 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73989

an abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Toufighi v.

Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hutauruk’s motion to reopen

as untimely where the motion was filed over four years after the BIA’s final order,

see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Hutauruk failed to present sufficient evidence of

changed circumstances in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the

time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi

v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2010) (evidence supporting a motion to

reopen must be “qualitatively different” from what was presented at the initial

hearing). We reject Hutauruk’s contention that the BIA’s analysis was inadequate. 

See Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 990 (“[t]he [BIA] does not have to write an exegesis

on every contention”) (internal quotes omitted). 

Finally, in light of our conclusions in Hutauruk v. Mukasey, 302 Fed. Appx.

695, 696 (9th Cir. Dec. 3, 2008), the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion to reopen to apply our decisions in Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049

(9th Cir. 2009), and Tampubolon v. Holder, 610 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2010). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 10.19 Non-employee director compensation






Exhibit 10.19


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors an annual retainer of $35,000, plus $1,000 per day for attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or $500 if the meeting is telephonic.  Our lead director is paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000.  Pay for attendance at meetings of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors by the Chairperson of the Committee is $1,500 per day or $750 if the meeting is telephonic and for other Board of Director attendees is $1,000 per day or $375 if the meeting is telephonic.   Pay for attendance at meetings of the Compensation Committee and Nominating Governance Committee of the Board of Directors by the Chairperson of the Committee is $1,500 per day or $750 if the meeting is telephonic and for other Board of Director attendees is $750 per day or $375 if the meeting is telephonic.  Each Chairperson of a Committee of the Board of Directors also receives an annual retainer.  The annual retainer for the Audit Committee Chairperson, the Compensation Committee Chairperson and the Nominating Governance Committee Chairperson is $18,500, $7,500 and $5,000, respectively.


In 2011, our non-employee directors received an option grant to purchase 1,500 shares of our common stock quarterly on the date that is two days after the public announcement of our earnings for the immediately preceding quarter.  Such options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date. 


In 2012, the equity component of the director's compensation will be valued at $110,000.  In February 2012, the directors received a quarterly option grant to purchase 1,875 shares of our common stock.  These options will become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  Beginning with the May 2012 annual meeting of the stockholders, our non-employee directors will be entitled to receive an annual equity package valued at $110,000 to replace the former quarterly grants of stock options.  Half of the annual equity package will consist of  restricted stock units and the other half will consist of  stock options.  The restricted stock units and stock options will vest fully on the first anniversary of the grant date or the next annual meeting of the stockholders, whichever is earlier.
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                        
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Massachusetts Natural Gas Number of Industrial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1,497  | 2,558 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,113  | 2,282  | 2,463  | 3,665  | 3,622  | 4,491  | 5,747  |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,701  | 4,690  | 4,760  | 4,844  | 4,550  | 4,410  | 4,594  | 4,468  | 4,477  | 4,339 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,038  | 4,192  | 4,819  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2010- O^^ ^ 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lAIA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED ^- \ 

DOCKET OST- / ^ - OZf ^ ACT;ON DATEJ^^^^ , ^ / / 

This approval and grant of antitrust iminiin! :•. . > ojcct, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 38?.30 or a riiview is undertaksn on the Department's own motion, 

iii view of die agreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

tjie abovrftrocedurc, the 21-diiy period ip 14 CFR 303.42 is waived. 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

Intemational Air Transport Association 

1776 K St. N.W. #12* Floor 

Washington DC 20006 
Summary DOCKET: OST-2010-XXXX US DOT ORDER: pending 

Date: 

Filing fee / lATA Acct: 

US/UST involved: 

8 December 2010 

USD 61 / 0000-54 

No 

End of Government Filing Period: 10 December 2010 

Intended effective date: 15 December 2010 

Agreement: Mail Vote 655 - Adoption 

TC23 Middle East-South East Asia 

Special Passenger Amending Resolution 01 Oi 

Fares between Qatar and Viet Nam 

Intended effective Date: 15 December 2010 

(Memo 0455) 

n 01 Oi
**Exhibit 15.2**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERD PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, CA 

Re: Registration Statement Nos. 333-62228, 333-01583 and333-125460 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated August 6, 2007related to our review of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not consideredpart of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

August 6, 2007
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Alaska Natural Gas % of Total Electric Utility Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.05   | 0.97   | 0.93   | 1.16   | 0.82   | 0.63   | 0.63  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.68   | 0.61   | 0.56   | 0.67   | 0.69   | 0.67   | 0.70   | 0.60   | 0.65   | 0.55  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.54   | 0.55   | 0.44   | 0.41   | 0.39   | 0.31   | 0.28   | 0.31   | 0.24   | 0.22  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.20   | 0.23   | 0.22   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Cove Point, MD Exports to Japan Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Cove Point, MD Exports to Japan Liquefied Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 71,879 | 87,107
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 49,834 | 35,029 | 23,898 | 66,189 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Joshua H. Levine,President and Chief Executive Officer of Mentor Corporation (the"Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)       the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended; and

(2)       information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 8, 2006

/s/JOSHUA H. LEVINEJoshua H. LevinePresident and Chief Executive Officer

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to Mentor Corporation and will be retained byMentor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1335 Indefinitely Postponed Senate (IPS)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1335

       For the relief of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 30 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

               August 6 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

                          Committee discharged

           September 20 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

 Previous action of August 6 (legislative day, June 30), 1993 vitiated 
                          by unanimous consent

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       For the relief of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed 
to pay to the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, out of any money in 
the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, a sum 
equal to the damages sustained by the Menominee Indian Tribe of 
Wisconsin by reason of--
            (a) the enactment and implementation of the Act of June 17, 
        1954 (68 Stat. 250), as amended, and
            (b) the mismanagement by the United States of Menominee 
        assets held in trust by the United States prior to April 30, 
        1961, the effective date of termination of Federal supervision 
        of the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.
    Sec. 2. Payment of the sum referred to in section 1 shall be in 
full satisfaction of any claims that the Menominee Indian Tribe of 
Wisconsin may have against the United States with respect to the 
damages referred to in such section.

                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30556 Conference Calendar

GENE G. RIVAS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus JOSEPH M. HARO; U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-1523

-------------------- February 20, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gene G. Rivas, federal prisoner #14791-074, appeals from the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Rivas argues that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has usurped the power committed to the court system by Article III by failing to credit his time in Arkansas state custody against his federal sentence. He argues that BOP’s action illegally extended his 240-month federal sentence to 262 months. Rivas’s letter pursuant to F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(j) is STRICKEN.No. 01-30556 -2- Sentencing courts are not authorized to compute credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b); the Attorney General is to make credit awards through the BOP after sentencing. “[T]he Attorney General is ordinarily not required to give credit toward a federal sentence for time spent by a prisoner serving a sentence imposed by another jurisdiction for an unrelated offense.” Shaw v. Smith , 680 F.2d 1104, 1106 (5th Cir. 1982). However, [t]ime spent in state custody, even if for an unrelated offense, must be credited toward time served on a federal sentence “if the continued state confinement was exclusively the product of such action by federal law-enforcement officials as to justify treating the state jail as the practical equivalent of a federal one.” Id . (citation omitted). The prisoner bears the burden of showing that this is the case. Id

. Rivas has not shown that his state imprisonment was the result of any federal action. Moreover, the time Rivas spent in state prison was credited to his state sentence. The statute precluded that time being credited to his federal sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). AFFIRMED.
No. 12-6730.

#### Ramirez-Salazar *v.*United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.18 Executive officer compensation






Exhibit 10.18


Executive Officer Compensation


The annual base salaries for our executive officers as of January 1, 2012 are as follows:


	
								
	Name
	 
	Title
	 
	Annual Base
Salary
	 

	George A. Lopez, M.D.
	 
	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$
	690,100
	

	 

	Alison D. Burcar
	 
	Vice President of Product Development
	 
	$
	231,750
	

	 

	Richard A. Costello
	 
	Vice President of Sales
	 
	$
	346,080
	

	 

	Scott E. Lamb
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$
	372,448
	

	 

	Steven C. Riggs
	 
	Vice President of Operations
	 
	$
	339,900
	

	 






2011 Discretionary Bonuses:


In July 2011, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved payment of bonuses to the above named officers for the first half of 2011, and in January 2012, the Compensation Committee approved bonuses to each of the above named officers for the second half of 2011.  The amount of the bonuses for the first half of 2011 were previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 21, 2011, and the amount of the bonuses for the second half of 2011 were previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2012, each of which reports are incorporated herein by reference.