alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

ATTACHMENT J

Work Sheets to Calculate Industry and EPA Labor Costs

INDUSTRY LABOR COSTS

Labor Category Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly 

Rate1

= W $48.31 $31.26 $15.78 

Benefits 

Percentage2

Lb = B/W 43% 43% 43%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $20.77 $13.44 $6.79 

Loaded Hourly 

Rate

Wb = W + B 

 = W(1+Lb)

$69.08 $44.70 $22.57 

Overhead 

Percentage3

Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo

$34.54 $22.35 $11.28 

Fully Loaded 

Hourly Rate

Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH 

$103.62 $67.05 $33.85 

1. Data Source: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm 

 Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations

 Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

 Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

 May 2006 data

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth 

Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the 

range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance. 
2

EPA LABOR COSTS

Labor Category Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate1= W $47.16 $31.18 $18.29 

Benefits Percentage2Lb = B/W 43% 43% 43%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $20.28 $13.41 $7.86 

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B 

 = W(1+Lb)

$67.44 $44.59 $26.15 

Overhead Percentage3Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo

$33.72 $22.29 $13.08 

Fully Loaded Hourly

Rate

Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH 

$101.16 $66.88 $39.23 

1. Data Source: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm 

 Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations

 Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

 Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

 May 2006 data

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth 

Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the 

range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
Exhibit 35.1
                                 ------------

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWMBS, INC.
                   CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2006-HYB1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HYB1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.


/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
FROM : FOR TI-E RECORD FAX NO. :3018788333 Jun. 11 2007 08: 4::f:IM P2 

ORIGINAL 

1 

1 MARYLAND DF.PARTMENT OF '\'H£i! ENVIRONM~~NT 

2 PllHLIC HE}\RING CONCERNTNG '1'l11;; 

3 CECIL COUNTY NONA'1"fAINMEN'T ARt:A a-HOUR OZONE STATF. 

4 UI.PI.1!:MENTATION !'I,AN AND SASJ<: VEAR INVENTORY 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 The hea ri l"lq in the a.bove mat tel.' <.;oromenr:ed 011 

11 'I"~llrsdCJy, May 24, ;?Ocn, at the Ceci.1 County Hea~ t.h 

12 Department, 40: Row ~trcul, ~lkton, MDryl~nd. 

". 

1 3 

14 

1!.:l RP,FORt.:: I3RIl\N HUG, Hearing O.lI i CP.t' 

16 

17 

1.9 Report.(~d hy: Frank Quinn 

19 

20 

21 

22 

For The Record, Inc. 

(301) 870-8025 - www.ftrinc.net - (800) 921-!>S55 
FROM : FOR n-E RECORD FAX NO. :3018708333 Jun. 11 2007 00: 49=l11 P3 

_.> 

1 A1 ... J?1 A BAlte Ii 

? 

3 ON BEHAl.F OF TU::: MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF' 'fBI:,; ENV::-RONMI:,;NT: 

4 BlUM HUG 

5 ANDY BEL'1'IBBIDLE 

6 

7 MaryhlIld Depnrtm~nL of t.hp. Environment 

8 1 ROO Washingtc.n Roulevcud 

9 Baltimore, Maryland 21230 

10 

11 

12 

13 

1 4 

15 

16 

11 

] 8 

'19 

20 

21 

22 

For The Record, Inc. 

(301) 870-8025 - www.f1rinc.net - (800) 921-5555 
FROM : FOR THE RECORD FAX NO. :3018708333 

"'-

PRO C B &·n IN G S 

2 

3 MR. H8LTIBR:rn,l!:: Let the record show that the 

4 timu is now 6: 22 p.m. on May ~4t.h, 2:)07. ·~'hi:..; hea ring 

5 was sche(iuJed ::or a 6:00 p.m. st.i'lrt Lime. Thc.re are 

6 cur.r:ent.l V no persons in the I;Hldienco wishing to ma1<e any 

I statements on the record. So we request Lhat t.he c;oJ.rt. 

8 report.er pleilso (,;nter the hea.c; nq statement into tho 

9 record at. thi~ Lime. 

10 The ofiicia 1 close 0: tile cOITluun;w peri-od on 

11 t.his e:ighA_'-hour ozone SIP 010:.=;e8 tlt Lhe end of thl8 

1~ hearing today, May 24th, 2007. ~his public hearing is 

:3 now closed. 

J. 4 (Whereupon the bearing- was . 

15 concluded.) 

16 

l"J 

18 

:1.9 

20 

21 

22 

For The Record, Inc. 

(301) 870-8025 ~ www.ftrinc.net - (800) 921-5555 
FROM : FOR TI-E RECORD FAX NO. :3018708333 Jun. 11 2007 08: 5a:lM P5 

"-

I 

2 

:3 

4 

!) 

'6 

'f 

ij 

9 

10 

11 

111 

1:3 

14 

lr:: 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

/,1 

22 

4 

CER'J'IF .1.C1\TR <.H!' RRPOWfEJ1 

I, Frank Quinn, do hereby certlfy thctt the 

foregoing proceedings were electronically recorded by me 

v.La audiotape and .reduced tr: typewr.i ting ',mdcr My 

Huperviaion; that I an neiLher counsel for, related tu,. 

nor employed hY<l:'lY of the pal-ties to the 'act.ion 1::1 which 

t.hese proceedings were transcribed; that I am not a 

re lati vc or employee of any attorney or cOl.m;,;;el c:tp lo}'ed 

by the parties hereLo, ncr financially or olherwise 

interested in the outcome of this action. 

J ~~,,' ~-----,,--__ £.n"1 

J'nmk Quinrl 

Cour.t Repor1..p.l:' 

For The Record, Inc. 

(301) 870-8025 ~ www.ftrinc.net - (800) 921 5555
EXHIBIT 4.10.2

Amendment No. 2
to License No. 6038 (registration series A 002831)
dated March 7, 1997

To add an additional clause to the Conditions for Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 6038 to read as follows:

“The Licensee shall allow the subscribers of the GSM-900 cellular network deployed in the Republic of Belarus to use the services of SPS-900 network created by the Licensee. Interaction of the newly-created network with the GSM-900 network of the Republic of Belarus shall be effected by the Licensee pursuant to the requirements of the Administration of Communications of the Russian Federation”.

 

	 First Deputy Chairman
 of the State Committee
 on Communications and
 Information of the Russian
 Federation
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 	  
 	 N. S. Marder
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	 June 05, 1998
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 	  
 
	 Head of the Department
 of the Organization
 of Licensing Activity
 
 
 	  
 	 [Signature]
 [Seal]
 	  
 	 N. M. Popov
 
 
 




14
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
following certification accompanies the issuer’s Report on Form 10-K and is not
filed, as provided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551 dated June 30,
2003.




In
connection with the accompanying Report of MyECheck, Inc. (“MYECHECK”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Heidinger,
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MYECHECK, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of MYECHECK.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
MyECheck, Inc. and will be retained by MyECheck, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      March 31, 2009/s/ James
      R. HeidingerJAMES
      R. HEIDINGERChief
      Financial Officer
#### Reginald KIT, Jr., Appellant, v. Ashley GARBER, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-2737

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Edward Nicholas, Judge.

Affirmed.
No. 12-6379.

#### Luevano *v.*Supreme Court of the United States et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Colorado Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.8   | 99.6   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Oree Deandre WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2351

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

Debra B. Tuomey of Debra B. Tuomey, Attorney at Law, LLC, Spring Hill, for Appellant.

*523Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn A. Tiffin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without comment the order revoking Oree West’s community control in case numbers 2012-CF-8004 and 2012-CF-8722 and the resulting sentences imposed in those cases. However, because the circuit court failed to continue Mr. West’s youthful offender status originally assigned to him in those eases, we remand for the trial court to correct Mr. West’s written sentences to reflect his continuing youthful offender status. See Ware v. State, 197 So.3d 1147, 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (“[F]ollowing a revocation, ‘the sentencing court must maintain the defendant’s youthful offender status upon resen-tencing for a violation of probation even when the violation was substantive.’ ” (quoting Yegge v. State, 88 So.3d 1058, 1059-60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012))); see also Jaques v. State, 224 So.3d 929, 930 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Mr. West need not be present.

Additionally, following revocation, the circuit court entered new judgments in 2012-CF-8004 and 2012-CF-8722. “Dupli-cative adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous, are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings.” Butler v. State, 195 So.3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016); see also Pierce v. State, 150 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Thus, we reverse the unauthorized judgments.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

KELLY, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Activity Name Duration Start Finish

Phase 1 CI Approval 0.0d 22-Sep-04 AFeasibility Studies 182.0d 22-Sep-04 A 22-Mar-05 APhase 2a CI Approval 0.0d 23-Mar-05 AEngineering, Permitting, Procurement, Contracting

223.0d 23-Mar-05 A 31-Oct-05 A

Phase 2b CI Approval 0.0d 01-Nov-05 ADesign, Procurement Fabrication,Site Prep

468.0d 01-Nov-05 A 11-Feb-07 A

Phase 3 CI Approval 0.0d 12-Feb-07 AConstruction, Start-Up, Commissioning, Turnover

840.0d 12-Feb-07 A 01-Jun-09 A

Tie-In Outage 97.0d 23-Feb-09 A 31-May-09 AFGD & SCR In-Service 0.0d 01-Jun-09 AConstruction Complete 0.0d 01-Jun-09 A

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 

04 2005 2006 2007 2

Phase 1 CI Approval

Feasibility StudiesPhase 2a CI Approval

Engineering, Permitting, Procurement, Contracting

Phase 2b CI Approval

Design, Procurement FabricaPhase 3 CI Approval

Conesville 4 FGD, SCR, and Associated Projects AEP Summary Schedule 

Actual WorkRemaining Work

Critical Remaining WorkMilestone

Page 1 of 1 TASK filter: All Activities

Summary schedules are based 
Activity Name Duration Start Finish

Phase 1 CI Approval 0.0d 01-Oct-01 AFeasibility Studies 854.0d 01-Oct-01 A 02-Feb-04 APhase 2a CI Approval 0.0d 02-Feb-04 AEngineering, Permitting, Procurement, Contracting

135.0d 02-Feb-04 A 16-Jun-04 A

Phase 2b CI Approval 0.0d 16-Jun-04 ADesign, Procurement, Fabrication, Site Prep

253.0d 16-Jun-04 A 24-Feb-05 A

Phase 3 CI Approval 0.0d 24-Feb-05 AConstruction, Start-Up, Commissioning, Turnover

802.0d 24-Feb-05 A 07-May-07 A

Unit 2 Outage 114.0d 23-Sep-06 A 15-Jan-07 AUnit 1 Outage 98.0d 20-Jan-07 A 28-Apr-07 AUnit 2 FGD In-Service 0.0d 26-Jan-07 AUnit 1 FGD In-Service 0.0d 28-Apr-07 A

3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 

2002 2003 2004 2005 

Phase 1 CI Approval

Feasibility StudiesPhase 2a CI Approval

Engineering, Permitting, ProcuremPhase 2b CI Approval

Design, ProcuremePhase 3 CI Approva

Mitchell 1 & 2 FGD, SCR, and Associated Projects AEP Summary Schedule 

Actual WorkRemaining Work

Critical Remaining WorkMilestone

Page 1 of 1 TASK filter: All Activities

Summary schedules are based
PMN Sanitized file of CAS Inventory Expert Report DSP acid
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                 |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|-------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                                 |  | 
|Dated:             June 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Fernando Bosque Mohíno
|                                 |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Fernando Bosque Mohíno 
|                                 |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                                 |  | 
|Dated:             June 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Rodrigo Guzmán Perera 
|                                 |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Rodrigo Guzmán Perera  
|                                 |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
From: Stoneman, Chris

Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 10:30 AM

To: Darrin.Pampaian@deq.idaho.gov

Cc: BECKHAM, LISA; Nair, Pat

Subject: RE: Proposed General Permit for HMA Plants in Indian Country

Attachments: Hot Mix Asphalt Plants Background Document Version 

1.0.pdf; Stone 

Quarrying, Crushing, and Screening Facilities Background Document Version 

1.0.pdf

Categories: Record Saved - Shared

Hi Darrin –

Thanks for your question. With regard to setbacks, we did not perform our 

own modeling but instead 

relied on the work states have performed in support of their general 

permits. In the case of setbacks, we 

relied on the States of Alaska and Washington. The background documents 

for rock crushing and HMA 

provide some more information and are attached. I also cc’ing our Region 

9 and 10 staff contacts who 

may be able to further assist you. We welcome comment on this issue 

through the Federal Register notice 

published January 14, 2014.

Thanks very much.

Chris Stoneman

From: Darrin.Pampaian@deq.idaho.gov 

[mailto:Darrin.Pampaian@deq.idaho.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 12:33 PM 

To: Stoneman, Chris 

Cc: Kevin.Schilling@deq.idaho.gov; Michael.Simon@deq.idaho.gov 

Subject: Proposed General Permit for HMA Plants in Indian Country

Chris,

I am an air permitting engineer for Idaho DEQ and have worked on our 

general permit for HMA plants. 

After a quick review of EPA’s permit the thing that stood out to me was 

the 150 foot setback to the 

property line and 1,000 foot setback to the nearest residence. I was 

wondering how these were 

established and if you had to demonstrate NAAQS compliance at these 

distances. Could you please give 

me the contact information (or forward my question) to someone who could 

help me out with these 

questions?

Darrin Pampaian, P.E.

Staff Engineer

Idaho DEQ - Air Quality Division
1410 N. Hilton, Boise ID 83706-1255

ph: (208) 373-0587 fax: (208) 373-0340

Darrin.Pampaian@deq.idaho.gov
#### Jesus Alejandro MARTINEZ and Veronica Reyna-Martinez, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0813

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 08, 2017

L.T. NO.: 12-21658

Dismissed.
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History: Annual                                      
|View History: Annual                                      
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|Louisiana Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|Louisiana Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1   | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | --------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |          |         |         |         |         |         | 243,297 | 33,085  | 6,946   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 48,592  | 172,637  | 82,446  | 154,549 | 158,585 | 186,262 | 254,739 | 246,439 | 136,239 | 93,054  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 124,961 | 173,400  | 161,448 | 199,104 | 247,983 | 203,177 | 142,576 | 35,052  | -24,202 | -173,955
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 203,426 | -138,414 | -52,618 |         |         |         |         |         |         |         
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, C.E. Andrews, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLMStudent Loan Trust 2006-3 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;     4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement andadministration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as indenture trustee.Date: March 23, 2007   /s/ C.E. Andrews   C.E. Andrews  Chief Financial Officer  SLM Funding LLC