alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Margaret J. Winn, Respondent, v Wayne D. Baker, Appellant.

[768 NYS2d 708]—

Kane, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County (Griffin, J.), entered October 9, 2000, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to *1170Family Ct Act article 4, for an order directing respondent to pay child support.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking support for the parties’ child. After a hearing, the Support Magistrate ordered, among other things, that respondent pay $82 weekly as his basic child support obligation and $33.11 weekly for child care, and established over $12,000 in arrears. Because respondent was incarcerated at the time of the hearing and earning $.45 a day, the Support Magistrate imputed income to respondent based on his salary before his arrest. Respondent filed objections to this order. Respondent appeals from Family Court’s denial of those objections.

Family Court correctly denied respondent’s objections. New York courts will not countenance a reduced child support award where a parent’s financial hardship results from his or her own intentional and wrongful conduct resulting in incarceration *(see Matter of Knights v Knights,*71 NY2d 865, 866-867 [1988]; *Matter of Furman v Barnes,*293 AD2d 781 [2002]). Granting respondent decreased child support payments based on his incarceration after his conviction of felony driving while intoxicated would permit him to benefit from his wrongful conduct to the detriment of his child *(see Matter of Onondaga County Dept. of Social Servs. v Timothy S.,*294 AD2d 27, 30 [2002]).

Family Court properly rejected respondent’s attempt to reduce his preincarceration income by deducting unreimbursed employee business expenses pursuant to Family Ct Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (vii) (A). Respondent submitted his tax return, which included tax deductions for business expenses totaling $13,002, nearly half his salary. The court was not required to accept the figures on his income tax return *(see Matter of Duguay v Paoletti,*279 AD2d 767, 768 [2001]). Based on the lack of substantiation for these deductions, in the form of receipts or other business records, the court properly declined to reduce respondent’s income by the claimed amount *(see La Porte v La Porte,*263 AD2d 585, 587 [1999]; *Faber v Faber,*206 AD2d 644, 645 [1994]).

Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25525-25526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12131]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office
[Docket No. 98-5]


Increase of Statutory and Other Copyright Fees

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of public hearings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 25526]]

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office of the Library of Congress will conduct a 
public hearing on increasing statutory and other copyright filing fees 
in accordance with technical amendments to the copyright law (Pub. L. 
105-80, 111 Stat. 1529 (1997)). The Office will issue a more detailed 
Notice of Information proposing specific fees several months before the 
public hearing in order to give an interested party time to file a 
written comment and/or notify the Office that he or she wishes to 
participate in the public hearing.

DATES: The hearing will be held on Thursday, October 1, 1998, beginning 
at 10:00 a.m. Additional hearing dates will be announced if necessary.

ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held in the Library of Congress, James 
Madison Memorial Building, Dining Room A, First and Independence 
Avenue, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Assistant 
General Counsel at (202) 707-8380.

    Dated: May 4, 1998.
Marilyn J. Kretsinger,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-12131 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 28, 2015

d0720 

# Order

Clerk July 28, 2015

150556

- 7

ROBERT FORD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 150556

- 7

COA: 316694; 318008

Oakland CC: 2012

- 128348

- NS

WOODWARD TAP, INC., d/b/a SOUTH,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

RONALD TALLEY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Leslie WILSON and Robert T. Wilson, Sr., Appellants, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSN., Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-5291

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Lisa S. Porter, Judge.

Affirmed.
**TERENCE
          S. MILANEY**
 **CERTIFIED
          PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT**
 **209
          EAS VERDUGO, SUITE 101**
 **BURBANK,
          CA 91502**
 **(818)
          972-2522** ***&*** **(FAX)
          972-2543**
 
   To
          the
          Board of Directors
 U.S.
          Mortgage
 A
          Wholly
          Owned Subsidiary of U.S. Holdings
 3825
          W.
          Sahara Avenue
 Las
          Vegas, Nevada 89146
  Independent
          Accountant's Report
  We
          have
          examined management's assertion about U.S. Mortgage's compliance with the
          minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association
          of
          America's Uniform
          Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP)
          as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005. Included in the accompanying
          management assertion. Management is responsible for U.S. Mortgage compliance
          with those minimum-servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express
          an
          opinion and management's assertion about the entity's compliance based
          on our
          company.
  Our
          examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
          Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
          on a test basis, evidence about U.S. Mortgage's compliance with the minimum
          servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered
          necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides
          a
          reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
          determination of U.S. Mortgage compliance with minimum
          servicing standards.
  In
          our
          opinion, management's assertion that U.S. Mortgage complied with the
          aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
          December
          31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respect.
  /s/Terrence
          S. Milaney
 Terence
          S. Milaney
 Certified
          Public Accountant
  February
          22, 2006
  ****
No. 12-6668.

#### Sherley *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
439P16

#### State v. Twyan Kenneth Coleman

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-305)

2. Defs Motion for Temporary Stay

3. Defs Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

i.

2. Allowed 12/09/2016

3.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September  30,  2007 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    November 14, 2007                     /S/     CHARLES E. HURWITZ
                           ----------------------------------------------------
                                                       Charles E. Hurwitz
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

YENDE FRANCIS

, Appellant,

v.

IAN ZEEK PARETS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3542

[ September 8, 2022 ]

Appeal of non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael G. Kaplan , Judge; L.T. Case No.

DVCE21

- 000006

.

Yende Francis, Southwest Ranches, pro se.

Natalie P. Mescolotto of NM Legal, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit
      (32.1)





CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
      undersigned officer hereby
      certifies as to the Report on Form 10-Q/A of Met-Pro Corporation for the fiscal
      quarter ended July 31, 2007, that (i) the report fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Met-Pro
      Corporation.







Dated:  February
                12, 2008
            /s/
                Raymond J. De HontRaymond
                J. De HontChairman,
                Chief Executive Officer and
                President
ex10_9.htm





Exhibit 10.9










 



	
Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers












The following are the annual base salaries for the named executive officers of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., effective January 1, 2012:







Randy K. Ferrell                                     $268,000


Eric P. Graap                                           $180,770
## Georgia-Pacific: Crossett, AR

Resin Plant Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Test Dates: May 16 and 17, 2012

Page: 3 of 29 

# SECTION 

# ONE Introduction and Summary

TABLE 1-1. RESIN PLANT RTO (INLET AND OUTLET LOADIN G)

TEST RUN NOS. 1 – 3 (RECYCLE HEAT RECOVERY OFF)

AVERAGE (RUN NOS. 1 - 3)

SOURCE : Inlet Outlet

GP Operating Parameters

RTO combustion chamber temperature, °C 947 947

Stack Gas Parameters

Temperature, oF 91.6 382.5

Volumetric flow, acfm 2,977 4,567

Volumetric flow, scfm 2,859 2,876

Volumetric flow, dscfh 167,484 166,490

Total VOC (as Methanol)

lb/hr 59.06 0.94

DRE, % by weight 98.41

Total VOC (measured by FTIR)

lb/hr 58.51 0.83

DRE, % by weight 98.57

Total HAP

ppmv wb 754 15.4

ppmv @ 3% Oxygen ------ 23.7

lb/hr 13.02 0.25

DRE, % by weight 98.03

Dimethyl Ether

ppmv wb 2,217 28.4

lb/hr 45.48 0.59

DRE, % by weight 98.71

HAP - Acetaldehyde

ppmv wb 22 0.8

lb/hr 0.43 0.02

DRE, % by weight 96.42

HAP - Cresols

ppmv wb 13 0.1

lb/hr 0.65 0.01

DRE, % by weight 99.22

HAP - Formaldehyde

ppmv wb 40 2.8

lb/hr 0.53 0.04

DRE, % by weight 93.01

HAP - Methanol

ppmv wb 614 11.1

lb/hr 8.76 0.16

DRE, % by weight 98.18

HAP - Phenol

ppmv wb 5.8 0.1

lb/hr 0.24 0.01

DRE, % by weight 97.90

HAP - Epichlorohydrin

ppmv wb 58 0.6

lb/hr 2.40 0.02

DRE, % by weight 97.58

Carbon Monoxide

ppmv wb 9,271 255.1

lb/hr 114.53 3.20

DRE, % by weight 97.20

Hydrogen Chloride

ppmv db ------ 55.2

lb/hr

------ 0.85



### 679-04 

## 1

- 3

## Georgia-Pacific: Crossett, AR

Resin Plant Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer

Test Dates: May 16 and 17, 2012

Page: 4 of 29 

# SECTION 

# ONE Introduction and Summary

TABLE 1-2. RESIN PLANT RTO (INLET AND OUTLET LOADIN G)

TEST RUN NOS. 4 – 6 (RECYCLE HEAT RECOVERY ON)

AVERAGE (RUN NOS. 4 - 6)

SOURCE : Inlet Outlet

GP Operating Parameters

RTO combustion chamber temperature, °C 910 910

Stack Gas Parameters

Temperature, oF 91.2 390.3

Volumetric flow, acfm 3,052 5,000

Volumetric flow, scfm 2,930 3,118

Volumetric flow, dscfh 172,701 179,893

Total VOC (as Methanol)

lb/hr 67.04 1.72

DRE, % by weight 97.47

Total VOC (measured by FTIR)

lb/hr 61.98 1.49

DRE, % by weight 97.62

Total HAP

ppmv wb 1,026 33.5

ppmv @ 3% Oxygen ------ 50.4

lb/hr 15.76 0.53

DRE, % by weight 96.73

Dimethyl Ether

ppmv wb 2,198 42.9

lb/hr 46.22 0.96

DRE, % by weight 97.92

HAP - Acetaldehyde

ppmv wb 24 0.5

lb/hr 0.49 0.01

DRE, % by weight 97.91

HAP - Cresols

ppmv wb 13 0.1

lb/hr 0.63 0.01

DRE, % by weight

HAP - Formaldehyde

ppmv wb 41 6.3

lb/hr 0.56 0.09

DRE, % by weight 83.39

HAP - Methanol

ppmv wb 940 26.3

lb/hr 13.73 0.41

DRE, % by weight 97.12

HAP - Phenol

ppmv wb 4.2 0.0

lb/hr 0.18 0.00

DRE, % by weight 98.60

HAP - Epichlorohydrin

ppmv wb 3.8 0.2

lb/hr 0.16 0.01

DRE, % by weight 88.86

Carbon Monoxide

ppmv wb 9,361 356.7

lb/hr 119.67 4.86

DRE, % by weight 95.94

Hydrogen Chloride

ppmv db

------ 5.2

lb/hr

------ 0.09



### 679-04 

## 1

- 4
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                    
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|AGA Western Consuming Region Natural Gas Injections into Underground Storage  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|AGA Western Consuming Region Natural Gas Injections into Underground Storage  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | 281,107 | 267,473 | 230,902 | 287,696 | 305,064 | 263,534
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 238,359 | 365,373 | 307,480 | 342,710 | 386,953 | 352,022 | 342,567 | 383,856 | 398,173 | 404,441
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 391,645 | 431,766 | 404,750 | 357,835 | 471,769 |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -589   | 739    | -295   | -493   | 431    | -234   | 3,636  | 621    | 4,442  | -462  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 44     | -70    | 213    | 466    | 630    | -985   | 2,128  | -29    | -36    | 312   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -964   | 265    | -160   | 81     | 128    | -588   | 93     | 82     | 65     | 703   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 54     | 22     | -545   | 255    | 4      | 546    | -34    | -397   | 330    | 142   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 187    | -173   | -130   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
#### COM. v. LOWRY, D.

1342 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania,

07/25/2017

CP-23-CR-0007099-2014 (Delaware)

Affirmed
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROYCE GOLDSMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D18-3446 and 4D19-792

[July 10, 2019]

Consolidated appeals of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the 

Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; 

Ernest A. Kollra, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 08-2288 CF10A, 09-6184 

CF10A and 11-17276 CF10A.

Royce Peter Goldsmith, Arcadia, pro se.

No appearance required by appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 243 (Fla. 2007) (“[F]or 

motions filed under rule 3.800(a), we hold that if the trial court could have 

imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet, any error was 

harmless.”).

WARNER, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
079P17

#### State v. Jimmy Allen Roberts

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal (COAP17-135)

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Judicial Notice

1. Dismissed *ex mero molu*

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J., recused
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19558-19559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 21.25-1, Issuance of Type Certificate: 
Restricted Category Agricultural Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
21.25-1, Issuance of Type Certificate: Restricted Category Agricultural 
Airplanes. This AC provides information and guidance for obtaining a 
type certificate in the restricted category under Title 14 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 21, Sec. 21.25, for small single-
engine piston and turbo-propeller driven airplanes, which will be used 
for agricultural special purpose operations. This AC provides an 
acceptable means, but not the only means, of meeting the requirements 
of 14 CFR part 21 for the issuance of a type certificate in the 
restricted category. This procedure

[[Page 19559]]

incorporates the appropriate normal category airworthiness standards of 
14 CFR part 23, Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, 
and Commuter Category Airplanes. This material is neither mandatory nor 
regulatory in nature and does not constitute a regulation.

DATE: Advisory Circular 21.25-1 was issued by the Manager, Small 
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, ACE-100, on 
December 1, 1997.

HOW TO OBTAIN COPIES: A copy may be obtained by writing to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT 
Warehouse SVC-121.23, Ardmore East Business Center, 3341 Q 75th Avenue, 
Landover, MD 20785, or by faxing your request to that office at 301-
386-5394.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 9, 1998.
Michael Gallagher,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 98-10387 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M