alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1242]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will 
meet by teleconference on January 22, 1998, at 2:00 p.m. EST.

STATUS OF MEETING: Open.

LOCATION: Members of the Board will participate by way of telephonic 
conferencing equipment allowing them all to hear one another. Members 
of the Corporation's staff and the public will be able to hear and 
participate in the meeting by means of telephonic conferencing 
equipment set up for this purpose in the Corporation's Conference Room, 
on the 11th floor of 750 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20002.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Approval of agenda.
    2. Consider and act on whether to reduce the Corporation's budget 
mark.
    3. Consider and act on proposed appointments to the Vice 
Presidencies established by the Board on November 15, 1997.
    4. Consider and act on an individual Corporate officer's request 
for permission to receive compensation from a source other than the 
Corporation while on leave from LSC.
    5. Consider and act on other business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel and 
Secretary of the Corporation, (202) 336-8810.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify JoAnn Gretch, at (202) 336-8810.

    Dated: January 14, 1998.
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel and Secretary of the Corporation.
[FR Doc. 98-1242 Filed 1-14-98; 12:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nancy D.
      Parmelee, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of
      the
      Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      May 9, 2006











/s/
      Nancy D. Parmelee


Nancy
      D.
      Parmelee


Senior
      Vice President,


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 31  CERTIFICATION  I, Paul Esposito, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Famous Uncle Als Hot Dogs & Grille, Inc. (the Company);  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of  the  Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability trecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.   /s/   Paul Esposito __________________________ Paul Esposito Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  April 16, 2007
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 3,155,948 | 3,166,168 | 3,201,316
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3,232,849 | 3,274,482 | 3,285,025 | 3,346,809 | 3,350,314 | 3,446,120 | 3,501,853 | 3,543,027 | 3,600,505 | 3,613,864
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,704,501 | 3,738,260 | 3,809,370 | 3,859,647 | 3,939,101 | 3,984,481 | 4,067,508 | 4,156,991 | 4,205,412 | 4,248,613
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,288,495 | 4,326,156 | 4,370,057 | 4,424,103 | 4,469,282 | 4,515,690 | 4,573,047 | 4,633,561 | 4,702,609 | 4,787,135
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,896,051 | 5,014,915 | 5,097,533 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Oregon Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Oregon Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 12,481 | 13,345 | 10,242
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 11,775 | 10,990 | 9,117  | 7,098  | 9,707  | 7,264  | 8,238  | 9,532  | 7,354  | 8,073 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,394  | 5,044  | 4,554  | 4,098  | 3,700  | 4,554  | 4,818  | 5,298  | 6,362  | 5,838 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7,026  | 7,859  | 8,819  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12067]



[[Page 25205]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IN98-3-000]


Consumers Energy Company; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

May 1, 1998.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Thursday, May 21, 1998 at 10:00 a.m., at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C., for the purpose of exploring the possible 
settlement of the above-referenced docket. If necessary, the conference 
will continue to Friday, May 22, 1998.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, contact Gerald L. Richman at (202) 208-
2036.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12067 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6525

RANDLE LENARD FREEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Greensville Correctional Center,

Jarratt, Virginia,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (CA-03-650-3)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 18, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randle Lenard Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Winslow Reed,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Randle Lenard Freeman seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) as untimely. An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Freeman has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 24.7

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Catherine Hill and Cynthia Scheuer, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: 

(1)  execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an officer and/or director of Mechanical Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder; 

(2)  do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and 

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion. 

The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of this 20th day of December , 2002. 

s/Shimshon Gottesfeld
#### In the Matter of Steve Zakheim, Appellant, v Town of Fallsburg et al., Respondents.

[768 NYS2d 695]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered September 25, 2002 in Sullivan County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7, denied petitioner’s motion for summary judgment.

Petitioner is the owner of numerous properties in the Town of Fallsburg, Sullivan County, including two parcels that are the subject of this tax certiorari proceeding. In 1999, petitioner received approval from the Village of Woodridge Planning Board to develop these parcels, as well as other contiguous parcels, into condominiums. As of March 1, 2001, however, petitioner had not yet filed a condominium declaration for the subject parcels *(see*Real Property Law § 339-f). Accordingly, respondent Michael Pilmenstein, the Assessor for the Town of Fallsburg, assessed the parcels on a fee simple basis rather than treating them as condominiums *(see*Real Property Law § 339-y; RPTL 581). Petitioner filed a grievance, contending that the parcels, if properly treated as condominiums, should have been assessed at 10% of the values calculated by Pilmenstein. Respondent Board of Assessment Review denied the grievance prompting the instant proceeding. Supreme Court denied petitioner’s subsequent motion for summary judgment on the issue of the proper basis for valuing the parcels, and he now appeals.

We affirm. Under the Condominium Act *(see*Real Property Law art 9-B), a condominium property can receive favorable unit-based tax treatment *(see*Real Property Law § 339-y; RPTL 580) only if the property has been “submitted” to the provisions of the act by executing and recording a declaration to that effect *(see*Real Property Law §§ 339-f, 339-y [1] [a]; [2] [d]; [3]). Petitioner concedes that he did not file such a declaration with regard to the subject parcels until after the appropriate tax status date, but nonetheless contends that the parcels should have been assessed as condominiums. We disagree. Petitioner did not file the requisite declaration with regard to the subject parcels prior to March 1, 2001 and, thus, did not submit these parcels to the provisions of the Condominium Act. Accordingly, the parcels are not eligible for condominium tax treatment in *1126accordance with the act’s provisions, despite their anticipated future use as condominiums.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2

 

Mechanical Technology Incorporated

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mechanical Technology Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Scheuer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), that, to my knowledge:
#### Lisa HICKS, Appellant, v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3319

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 15, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hills-borough County; Rex M. Barbas, Judge.

Affirmed.