alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                               
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Elba Island, GA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Trinidad and Tobago  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                            
|Price of Elba Island, GA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Trinidad and Tobago  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | 1.92   | 3.51   | 5.12   | 6.47   | 8.59   | 7.14   | 6.85   | 9.88   | 3.75  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.28   | 3.86   | 2.71   | 3.28   | 4.33   | 2.83   | 2.49   | 3.28   | 4.41   | 4.78  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 136

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a credit for the

purchase of child restraint systems used in motor vehicles.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21 (legislative day, JANUARY 5), 1993

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a credit for the purchase of child restraint systems used

in motor vehicles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR PURCHASE OF CHILD RESTRAINT

4 SYSTEMS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub6 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is

8 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

9 section:
2

•S 136 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 25A. PURCHASE OF CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM.

2 ‘‘(a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of an individual,

3 there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed

4 by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to

5 the costs incurred by the taxpayer during such taxable

6 year in purchasing a qualified child restraint system for

7 any child of the taxpayer.

8 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

9 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM.—

10 The term ‘qualified child restraint system’ means

11 any child restraint system which meets the require12 ments of section 571.213 of title 49 of the Code of

13 Federal Regulations.

14 ‘‘(2) CHILD.—The term ‘child’ has the meaning

15 given to such term by section 151(c)(3).’’.

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec17 tions for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter

18 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by

19 inserting after the item relating to section 25 the following

20 new item:

‘‘Sec. 25A. Purchase of child restraint system.’’.

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

23 December 31, 1992.

Æ
Heath Morton 

Eye In The Sky Aerial Photography 

76 Tanager Court 

Chillicothe, Ohio 45601 

Federal Aviation Administration: 

Specific Sections in which Eye In The Sky Aerial Photography is seeking an exemption: 

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: EYE IN THE SKY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(l) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 

3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION 

ANDREFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief: 

In order to use our Unmanned Aircraft Systems for commercial use. We are seeking this exemption in order to legally 

conduct business and comply with all Federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our 

Unmanned Aircraft Systems. 

How our request would benefit the public as a whole: 

Granting the petition for Eye In The Sky Aerial Photography would allow for us to be able to efficiently, legally, 

economically, and safely perform aerial video and photography of special events, sporting events, land survaillance, real 

estate, commercial inspections, and commercial maintenance over certain areas of these United States. Using Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the environment and also provide a 

safer altemative for businesses to conduct land and equipment inspections. 

Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least 

equal to the existing rule: 

By adhering to guidelines set forth by the FAA we would not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night 

therefore avoiding any hazardous accidents such as colliding with a manned aircraft. We will also be regularly test flying 

and doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the quads are in proper working order for each job or event as to prevent 

damage or bodily injury. 

Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating--

1. SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 

3 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND 

REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112-95) 

2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use. 

Submitted on July 22, 2015 by: 

Heath Morton 

Eye In The Sky Aerial Photography 

76 Tanager Court 

Chillicothe, Ohio 45601
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, Subcommittee Meeting on 
Planning and Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The ACRS Subcommittee on Planning and Procedures will hold a 
meeting on June 2, 1998, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.
    The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the 
exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) 
(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate 
solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACRS, and 
information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, June 2, 1998--12:00 Noon--1:30 p.m.

    The Subcommittee will discuss proposed ACRS activities and related 
matters. It may also discuss the qualifications of candidates for 
appointment to the ACRS. The purpose of this meeting is to gather 
information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and to formulate 
proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the 
full Committee.
    Oral statements may be presented by members of the public with the 
concurrence of the Subcommittee Chairman; written statements will be 
accepted and made available to the Committee. Electronic recordings 
will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are 
open to the public, and questions may be asked only by members of the 
Subcommittee, its consultants, and staff. Persons desiring to make oral 
statements should notify the cognizant ACRS staff person named below 
five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made.
    Further information regarding topics to be discussed, the 
scheduling of sessions open to the public, whether the meeting has been 
canceled or rescheduled, the Chairman's ruling on requests for the 
opportunity to present oral statements, and the time allotted therefor 
can be obtained by contacting the cognizant ACRS staff person, Dr. John 
T. Larkins (telephone: 301/415-7360) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. 
(EDT). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual one or two working days prior to the meeting to 
be advised of any changes in schedule, etc., that may have occurred.

    Dated: May 5, 1998.
Sam Duraiswamy,
Chief, Nuclear Reactors Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-12531 Filed 5-11-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen Soller, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Panglobal Brands Inc.
      for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Panglobal Brands Inc.                                                                  

Dated: January 14, 2008

/s/ Stephen SollerStephen SollerChief Executive
Officer, and Director(Principal Executive Officer)Panglobal Brands
Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Panglobal Brands
Inc. and will be retained by Panglobal Brands Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
### High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint [6/15/2011 11:06:57 AM] You are here: EPA Home Prevention, Pesticides & Toxic Substances Pollution Prevention & Toxics High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Submission Report 

# High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS)

Contact Us 

### Search: All EPA This Area



# Submission Report

Submission Information

Submission ID : 25331185 Submission Name : 928-72-3
AR Number :



## Chemical Information

CAS Number : 928-72-3 Ninth Collective Index Name : Glycine, N-(carboxymethyl)-, disodium salt



## Submitter Information

Submitter's Name : EPA
Address : City : Washington
State : DC
ZIP/Postal Code : Country : Type of Submitter : Company 

## Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address : 

## Additional Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address :


## Sponsor Information Sponsor's Name : EPA
Address : City : State : ZIP/Postal Code : Country : Phone Number : Fax Number : Share

### High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) | High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge | OPPT | US EPA

http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint [6/15/2011 11:06:57 AM] EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us http://iaspub.epa.gov/hpvis/ServSubmissionPrint Print As-Is Last updated on Wednesday, June 15, 2011 E-Mail Address : Type of Sponsor : Company 

## Technical Point of Contact Information

Technical Point of Contact : Title : Phone Number : Fax Number : E-Mail Address :
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2665-000]


PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Notice of Filing

May 4, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 23, 1998, the PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. 
(PJM), filed on behalf of the Members of the LLC, membership 
applications of Cargill-Alliant LLC. PJM requests an effective date on 
the day after this Notice of Filing is received by FERC.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protests said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before May 15, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12224 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
175P17

#### In the Matter of T.K.

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-1047)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 06/05/2017

2.
Exhibit
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Stoneleigh Partners Acquisition Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2008 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gary Engle, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  October
6, 2008
  By:              /s/Gary
Engle
 Gary
Engle
 Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer








































1
#### In the Matter of Christopher S. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Carol S., Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 812]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lehman, J.), entered September 25, 2002, which, after a hearing, in effect, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption. The appeal brings up for review a fact-finding order of the same court entered August 19, 2002, finding that the mother had permanently neglected the child.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner established, by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g]), that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship between the mother and the subject child, who was in the petitioner’s custody for several years *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [f] [2], [3]; *Matter of Joyce Marie B.,*305 AD2d 589, 590 [2003]; *Matter of Luno Scott A.,*292 AD2d 602, 603 [2002]; *Matter of La’Quan De’Vota H.,*259 AD2d 486, 487 [1999]). The petitioner also established, by clear and convincing evidence, that the mother failed to plan for the child’s future during that period of time *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [c]; *Matter of Shane Anthony P.,*307 AD2d 297 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 513 [2003]; *Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Tina D.] v Kenneth D.,*213 AD2d 714 [1995]; *Matter of Tammy B.,*185 AD2d 881, 882-883 [1992]; *Matter of Sonia H.,*177 AD2d 575 [1991]; *Matter of Travis Lee G.,*169 AD2d 769, 770 [1991]). Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that the mother had permanently neglected the child *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).

Under the circumstances, the Family Court properly terminated the mother’s parental rights *(see Matter of Avery Curtis Foster Joe D.,*306 AD2d 276, 278 [2003]).

*451The mother was not deprived of her right to the effective assistance of counsel *(see*Family Ct Act § 262 [a] [iv]; *Matter of Bryan W.,*299 AD2d 929, 930 [2002]; *Matter of Jimmy H.,*274 AD2d 430 [2000]). S. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
This DVD contains files that could not easily be posted to the electronic docket due to their file type or 

structure. This DVD docket submission contains:

1. The MOVES code, database, runspecs, and post-process scripts that were used to generate the nonCO2 downstream emission rates for the LD GHG 2017-2025 Proposal Analysis.

2. The OMEGA 1.4 code, inputs, preprocessors, outputs, and post-processors for the LD GHG 2017-2025 

Proposal Analysis.

3. Greet 1.8c which provided the basis of the upstream emission rates from fuel production.

4. TR_SB_limited_trading, which provided the basis for the upstream emission rates from electricity 

production. http://www.epa.gov/airmarkt/progsregs/epa-ipm/BaseCasev410.html

5. Data from EPA’s analysis of the American Powers Act, referenced as supporting material for the 

rulemaking.

For technical questions concerning these materials contact Ari Kahan (kahan.ari@epa.gov)
EXHIBIT
3.1





RESTATEMENT
OF THE CERTIFICATE OF ORGANIZATION


OF


LINCOLNWAY
ENERGY, LLC





TO THE
SECRETARY OF STATE


OF THE
STATE OF IOWA:





The
Members of Lincolnway Energy, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company, elected to
have Lincolnway Energy, LLC be subject to the Iowa Revised Uniform Limited
Liability Company Act (the "Act") effective as of November 10,
2010.  As part of that election, and pursuant to Section 489.202(3) of
the Act, Lincolnway Energy, LLC adopts this restatement of the certificate of
organization, with the articles of  restatement of Lincolnway Energy,
LLC which were filed on June 29, 2007 having been amended by the Members of
Lincolnway Energy, LLC by repealing the articles of restatement in their
entirety and by substituting this restatement of the certificate of organization
in lieu thereof.





ARTICLE
I





The name
of the limited liability company is Lincolnway Energy, LLC (the
"Company").





ARTICLE
II





The
street and mailing address of the registered office of the Company is 700
Walnut, Suite 1600, Des Moines, Iowa 50309.





ARTICLE
III





The name
and street and mailing address of the registered agent for service of process of
the Company is Wade H. Schut at 700 Walnut, Suite 1600, Des Moines, Iowa
50309.





Dated
this 10th day of November, 2010.





By:
              /s/ Jeff TaylorName:  Jeff
      TaylorTitle:  Manager




E-1
### BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N WASHINGTON , D.C .

Agreements Adopte d b

y th e Traffi c Conference s o f th e Internationa l Ai r Transpor t Associatio n OST-2009-032 6

APPLICATIO N FO R APPROVA L O F AGREEMENT S

B Y TH E INTERNATIONA L AI R TRANSPOR T ASSOCIATIO N lAT A AGREEMEN

T APPROVE

D & IMMUNIZE

D . . DOCKE T OST-.22- - ^-^/ ^ ACTIO N DAT E /l^^^*^-" , O ^ /

^ Thi s approva

l an dgran t o f antitrus t immunit y i s subject, wher

e applicable , t o condition s previousl

y imposed . Thi s actio n i s effectiv

e afte r 7 day s unles s apetition i s file dunde r 1 4 CF R385.3 0 o r arevie w i s undertake

n o n the Department' s ow

n motion . I n vie w o f th e agreement' s noncontroversia l natur e an dthe availabilit

y o f th e abov e oroCfdure , th e 21>i«.yjperiedia>4 CpR303.42 i s waived . ector, Offic e of Internationa

l Aviatio n 

### 0 4 Decembe r200 9 Communication s wit h respec t t o thi s documen t shoul d b e sen t t o Douglas E . Lavi n Regiona l Vic e President - Nort h America Internationa l Ai rTranspor t Associatio n I AT A Washington , 60 1 Pennsylvani a Avenue , N.W . Suit e 30 0 - Nort h Buildin g Washingto n D C 2000 4