alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 26818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: June 22-23, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. until adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Mary Stephens-Frazier, Ph.D., Building 45, Room 
3AN-28, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5971.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel (NINR/ORMH Mentored Research Scientist 
Development Award for Minority Investigators.
    Date: June 24, 1998.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Mary Stephens-Frazier, Ph.D., Building 45, Room 
3AN-18, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5971.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.361, Nursing 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: May 7, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-12775 Filed 5-13-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                           
|View History:                                                                                  
|                                                                                               
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Nigeria (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               
|                                                                                               
|Price of Sabine Pass, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Nigeria (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.77   | 3.54  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
041P16

#### E. Brooks Wilkins Family Medicine, P.A. v. WakeMed; WakeMed d/b/a Falls Pointe Medical Group; Inam Rashid, MD; Michele Casey, MD; Monica Oei, MD; and Leslie Robinson, MD

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-217)

Denied
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Mellon Financial Corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that the Corporations
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                      |  |                       |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ Michael A. Bryson
|                      |  | Name:                 |  | Michael A. Bryson      
|                      |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### COM. v. ORTIZ, A.

1590 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/12/2017

Reargument Denied 9/19/2017

CP-06-CR-0005948-2014

(Berks)

Affirmed
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Alaska Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Alaska Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 1,659   | 2,240   | 6,864  
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 4,748   | 8,459   | 16,056  | 15,217  | 14,402  | 17,842  | 15,972  | 17,336  | 15,895  | 12,153 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 30,250  | 15,249  | 94,232  | 97,828  | 111,069 | 64,148  | 72,686  | 116,682 | 153,670 | 192,239
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 193,875 | 223,194 | 234,716 | 237,702 | 238,156 | 292,811 | 295,834 | 271,284 | 281,872 |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Mississippi Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Mississippi Natural Gas Total Liquids Extracted (Thousand Barrels)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 497    | 501    | 362    | 366    | 358    | 576    | 318   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 338    | 408    | 319    | 305    | 337    | 313    | 254    | 232    | 370    | 4,149 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8,525  | 11,088 | 12,615 | 8,431  | 9,333  | 10,076 | 9,666  | 9,133  | 7,563  | 12,591
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12,618 | 7,732  | 377    | 359    | 365    | 257    | 201    | 25     | 5      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3      | 3      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 118 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 118

  To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit a 
  State to elect not to establish an American Health Benefit Exchange.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Fleming introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit a 
  State to elect not to establish an American Health Benefit Exchange.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Federal Exchanges from 
Destroying States Act'' or the ``STOP the FEDS Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE OPT OUT FROM AMERICAN HEALTH BENEFIT EXCHANGE 
              REQUIREMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 1311 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(l) State Opt Out.--
            ``(1) In general.--A State may elect not to establish any 
        required Exchange for the State (or to cease the operation of 
        all required Exchanges for the State) if the State enacts a law 
        that provides for such election.
            ``(2) Termination of opt out.--A State may repeal a law 
        described in paragraph (1) and provide for the establishment of 
        an Exchange for the State.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1311(b)(1) of the Patient Protection and 
        Affordable Care Act is amended by striking ``Each State'' and 
        inserting ``Subject to subsection (l), each State''.
            (2) Section 1321(c) of such Act is amended by adding at the 
        end the following sentence: ``The preceding sentence shall not 
        apply to a State that has in effect a law described in section 
        1311(l).''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 90 (Monday, May 11, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2273]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceeding

May 4, 1998.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of these 
documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 M 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed May 26, 1998. See Sec. 1.4(b)(1) of the 
Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.
    Subject: Advanced Television Systems and Their Impact Upon Existing 
Television Broadcast Service (MM Docket No. 87-268, FCC 98-24).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 32.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Sales,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12410 Filed 4-8-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Hatch: 

JUL 5 2012 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Ogden-Hinckley Airport for a 

grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program. 

The Small Community Program was established to help smaller communities address air service 

deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, 

the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant awards each year, although no more than 4 

awards may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude 

in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the 

types of projects that can be funded. 

On May 15, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular proposal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our normal practice, I am placing· a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely yours, 

AlohaLey 

A€~· £) 

Associate Director, Small Community 

Air Service Development Program 
I f •~.t;·:;. 

.I,' t I ' 

·i ! ~ .:,1 ·:c.· v.·~···,-:(.< 

I 1,' '~:,. -I ·. 

Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE W86-310 

Washington DC 20590 

June 11, 2012 

RE: Small Community Air Service Development Program DOT-OST-2012-0069 

Dear Associate Director Ley: 

i /.f-~. :,·,·r: '·;~r _ ... ,~~~ ; .... ~ 

j."",Ji"\: CL.i, ; :·.··: :f~i 

•,_!L: i·.-· ::..·Tf~.~~.:! 

Ogden-Hinckley Airport located in Ogden, Utah is proposing to assist in increasing access to 

our nation's sir system. Commercial air service is projected to attract business and leisure customers 

and may increase economic development activities and contribute to the city's economy by 

increasing access to area ski resorts. 

As scheduled passenger air service does not yet exist, the airport has partnered with Allegiant 

Travel Company to potentially provide commercial jet service to start this autumn. The Airport has 

secured multiple sources for matching funds, representing community wide support for this possible 

establishment of new routes. 

As you develop priorities and review proposed projects for "Small Community Air Service 

Development Program", please give Ogden-:llinckley Airport's application full and fair 

consideration. 

OGH:dbb 

Sincerely, 

Orrin G. Hatch 

United States Senator
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 98-20749

Summary Calendar

MARGARET STARKS; RENITA MCCRAY; ROSHELLE LEWIS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

KINDERCARE LEARNING CENTERS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-3454)

February 19, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Margaret Starks, Renita McCray, and Roshelle Lewis

(hereinafter "plaintiffs ") filed suit in the 152nd Judicial

District Court of Harris County, Texas against their employer

KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc. ("KinderCare") alleging that

racially discriminatory personnel actions were taken against each

of them inc luding, but not limited to, "demotion, transfer,2

reprimands, harassments, and termination" in violation of the Texas

Human Rights Act, Texas Labor Code § 21.001, et seq. KinderCare

removed the case to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas on the basis of diversity jurisdiction.

After extensive deposition and discovery, KinderCare moved for

summary judgment on the grounds that all of the actions taken

against each of the plaintiffs we re based on legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons and that plaintiffs had failed to raise a

genuine issue of fact as to whether any of the employment decisions

were pretextual or were intentionally discriminatory. The district

court granted summary judgment in favor of KinderCare and

plaintiffs appealed.

We have carefully considered the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the summary judgment

record itself; and conclude that the district court did not commit

reversible error in rendering summary judgment for KinderCare.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20698

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NICOLAS PENA-REYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CR-0045-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nicolas Pena-Reyes appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. PenaReyes contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony”

provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

He therefore argues that his conviction must be reduced to one

under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a),

his judgment must be reformed to reflect a conviction only under
No. 03-20698

-2-

that provision, and his sentence must be vacated and the case

remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Pena-Reyes acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### TILNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 13139.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 23, 1950.

*1010Vincent F. Kilborn, Mobile, Ala., for petitioner.

S. Dee Hanson, Ellis N. Slack, Morton K. Rothschild, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Theron Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles Oliphant, Chief Counsel, W. Herman Schwatka, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for resondent.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sustaining the Commissioner’s determination, the Tax Court held on the pleadings that petitioner was not entitled to deductions on account of three dependents, the minor children of a deceased nephew of the taxpayer, actually residing with, and actually dependent upon, her for their support.

Petitioner, agreeing that the dependents for whom she claimed deductions are not named in the definition of dependents in Sec. 25(b) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, 26 U.S.C.A. § 25(b) (3),. is here insisting that those definitions are not exclusive but only illustrative, and that the dependents for whom she claims deductions come within its principle.

We cannot agree. The judgment of the Tax Court was right. It is

Affirmed.