alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

CATHERINE DIAZ , Appellant,

v.

JONATHAN VASQUEZ , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2969

[ February 7, 2018 ]

Appeal on non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; John P. Contini , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017

- 009723 (44) (93)

.
Kimberly H. Schultz of Kimberly H. Schultz, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Jonathan Vasquez, Broward, pro se.

P ER C URIAM

.
Catherine Diaz (the wife) appeals from an order denying her motion for change of venue from Broward County, the husband’s present co unty of residence where he filed his petition for dissolution of marriage , to Miami

Dade County, where the wife and the marital child currently reside. We

reverse.

“The law is well settled in Florida that a cause of action for dissolution of marriage arises in the Florida county in which both parties last resided with a common intent to remain married.” Rakusin v. Rakusin , 569 So. 2d 893, 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). H ere, the parties last resided as husband and wife in the city of Hialeah, in Miami

- Dade County. No basis for venue in Broward County has been shown. Accordingly, we reverse this cause and remand with instructions that venue be transferred to Miami

- Dade C ounty, Florida.

Reversed.

G ROSS , C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Craig SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D15-5002

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Kevin A. Blazs, Judge.

AFFIRMED,
gfgi_ex10101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.10.1


 


 


 


MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT OF GAME FACE GAMING INC


POKER LICENSE AGREEMENT


THIS MODIFICATION AND EXTENSION AGREEMENT (‘Agreement’)is executed as of the 15th day of April, 2011, between GAME FACE GAMING,(GFG) A Florida Registered Corp (COMPANY, OR ORGANIZATION THAT HAS LICENSED THIS SOFTWARE ) on March 3, 2011, AND PRODIGIOUS


CAPITAL GROUP LLC. With addresses in Brooklyn NY AS (“YOU” or “CUSTOMER”)


 


RECITALS


 



	
1.  

	
GFG and the Customer entered into a Software License Agreement on March3, 2011.







 



	
2.  

	
Section 6 of the Agreement stated that the Customer would pay 50% or $50,000 as a down payment on the License. That payment was made and received by GFG.







 



	
3.  

	
Section 6 further delineated two additional payments. A payment representing 25% or $25,000 is due and payable on or about by July 1st, 2011 and an additional payment of 25% or $25,000 is due upon completion of the beta testing on or about Sept. 1st, 2011.







 


Given the turmoil in the online Poker industry surrounding Black Friday (April 15, 2011), and given that the Customer need more time to decide if it wishes to proceed with the License due to their business model and current new legislation guidelines and given that GFG has advised the Customer that it plans some redesigns of its platform to accommodate alternative membership models the parties wish to amend the License Agreement dated March 3, 2011 between them. For good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
GFG will retain the $50,000 paid by the Customer upon signing of the Agreement. Customer acknowledges that GFG has delivered to its satisfaction the current version of its Software as stated in the original contract dated 3-3-2011.







 



	
2.  

	
GFG will have the option to provide Customer with a redesigned membership model platform vs. a rake model, within 24 months of this modified agreement.







 



	
3.  

	
The second payment will not become due until 60 days after the completion of Beta testing and the code moved to Production Server/s of an online poker room membership model.







 



	
4.  

	
The third payment will become due sixty (60) days later.







 


All other terms of the License Agreement remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS THEREOF, each of the parties have executed this Modification Agreement as of this 25th Day of April 2011.
# C_2019179EN.01000202.xml

| 24.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/2

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2019/C 179/03)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 293:

| 7018 20 00 | Glass microspheres not exceeding 1 mm in diameter |
| --- | --- |

7018 20 00

Glass microspheres not exceeding 1 mm in diameter

The following text is inserted after the existing text:

‘This subheading also includes hollow glass microspheres.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
Unofficial Translation

Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganaderia y Pesca

Servicio Nacional de Sanidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria

Coordinación de Relaciones Internacionales

Letter CRI No. 5209/2013

For GARY S. COLGROVE

Institution: Director Sanitary Trade Issues Team

National Center for Import and Export

USDA-APHIS

For: Dr. Conrad ESTRADA

Institution: Area H Director

Email: Conrad.estrada@aphis.usda.qov

C.c.: Minister Alicia FALKOWSKI

Institution: DINES-MRECIC

C.c.: Ing. Miguel DONATELLI

Institution: MAGyP

C.c.: Ing. José MOLINA

Institution: Argentine Agricultural Council in USA

From DR. LEONARDO O. MASCITELLI

Institution: SENASA

Telephone: 4121-5353

Fax: 4121-5360

Date: November 8, 2013

e-mail: relint@senasa.gov.ar

No. of pages 

(including cover)

1 (one)

Re.: UNITED STATES – ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED BY USDA/APHIS 

FOR THE “IN SITU” INSPECTION VISIT (November 4 to 8, 2013).

Please find attached Additional Information requested by USDA/APHIS for the "in situ"

inspection visit, which took place between 4 and 8 of November, 2013.

In regard to this matter, we inform you that this National Service hand-delivered a copy 

of the information to APHIS auditors, as well as copy of the resolution SENASA 816/02, 

Decree 354/2013 and Animal Health Training Plan 2013.
Unofficial Translation

Sincerely yours,

Dr. Leonardo O. MASCITELLI

 Coordinator
No. 12-6642.

#### Patton *v.*Maine.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certio-rari denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 29, 2014

d0122

Order 

Clerk

January 29, 2014

143432

CHARLES MORRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 143432

COA: 296343

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, Wayne CC: 08-121147-CK

Defendant-Appellee,

and

AAA OF MICHIGAN,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 6, 2012, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Harris v 

ACIA (Docket No. 144579). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 

29, 2013, 494 Mich 462 (2013), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, 

because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this 

Court.
EXHIBIT 13.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2010 Ended September 30, 2010 of Pediment Gold Corp., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Gary Freeman Gary Freeman, President/CEO/Director (Principal Executive Officer)   Date: December 29, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.§1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen F. Cooper,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

| March 28, 2008 | /s/  Stephen F. Cooper                       |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                | Stephen  F. Cooper

Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

1

----
# C_2019239EN.01000501.xml

| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/5

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 239/06)

| Member State | Czech Republic |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Vienna (VIE) Austria
  Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Munich (MUC) Germany |
| Period of validity of the contract | 4 years following the start of operations |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 30 September 2019 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained | For further information please contact attorney of Moravian-Silesian Region:





  CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář |
| Hvězdova 1716/2b |
| 140 00 Praha 4 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC |
| Tel. +420 224827884 |
| Fax +420 224827879 |
| kucera@akccs.cz |
| www.akccs.cz |

Member State

Czech Republic

Concerned routes

Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Vienna (VIE) Austria

Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Munich (MUC) Germany

Period of validity of the contract

4 years following the start of operations

Deadline for submission of tenders

30 September 2019

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained

For further information please contact attorney of Moravian-Silesian Region:

CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář

Hvězdova 1716/2b

140 00 Praha 4

CZECH REPUBLIC

Tel. +420 224827884

Fax +420 224827879

kucera@akccs.cz

www.akccs.cz

Tender documentation will be published at:

https://nen.nipez.cz/profil/MSK

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019203EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/5 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9252 — CMOC/IXM)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 203/04)

1.

On 5 June 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019203EN.01000501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CMOC Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Molybdenum Co. Ltd (‘CMOC’, China), whose main shareholder is Cathay Fortune Corporation Co. Ltd (‘CFC’), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | IXM BV (‘IXM’, the Netherlands), controlled by New Silk Road Commodities Limited, which is wholly owned by NCCL Natural Resources Investment Fund LP. |

CMOC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of IXM. The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for CMOC: mining, processing, smelting, deep processing, research and development and trade of molybdenum, tungsten, copper, gold and other precious metals,

—   for IXM (formerly known as Louis Dreyfus Company Metals): global trader in both base metal concentrates (such as copper, zinc and lead concentrates) and refined metals (copper, zinc and lead) and by products (blister, anode, anode slimes, precious metal concentrates, cobalt and secondaries).

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019203EN.01000501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9252 — CMOC/IXM

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019203EN.01000501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019203EN.01000501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 167 ) ll-E-1 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:50:59AM

Sheet 167 of 276P. 2

i E3 3 i' 

# •yn CONVERSATIO N REC

C II-E-1 8 

# It tin TYP E Q VISI T Locatio n o fVisit/Conference : •CONFERENC E ^TELEPHON E •INCOMIN G •OUTGOIN G NAM E O F PERSONCS) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC T WIT H YO U ORGANIZATIO N (Office , dept. . bureau , j TELEPHON E NO* etc. ) 

# NlWJ^t|-L/i' 7 SUBJEC T Vy/ e po p -Ur \ W a J j | i ^i*» v ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L 

# 'P^ f •X . \C 4^,-tt ^ - 

# K *»•* - 

# ? A\^- va- » jV l t i r fW l IN T


## fy* ^ SUMMAR Y 

# Y /K^ . j~vuA " rj^ytuy ? o A VX-v \ \*K a \yi/o c ? A U //6/P /

a J Q^ryX-jJi y^(o^yl^Jl , 1~ K- j ° v ^ W o Jf^' j i~ C \ f^ J _> / 

# -fi>Kt U Ai_(L ^



## Ju wluU X Q Tj4,* > JUfl-g y3 - r-*j^k* i JU L •/ » 7 ^ 

# ^m Sk % Y*- v ' ' III.. . 

# ArT..?** * V'' 

# M ^ ^ \ %A*AJ-^*'

ACTIO N REQUIRE D

ACTIO N TAKE N t
SIGNATUR E TITL E 

# w* - 50271-10 1 U.S.G.P O 198 5 -461-275/2020 2 CONVERSATIO N RECOR D OPTfOMA- . FOR M 27 1 (12-76 ) DEPARTMEN TO F DEFENS E
345P16-2

#### State v. Dwayne Demont Haizlip

1. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

1. Denied 09/29/2016

2. Allowed 09/29/2016
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-1009-0791; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-213-AD; Amendme

10303 :lP1D-/O-:Li-f

39-*****; AD ~..***-**-**]

RlN 2l20-AA64 ~'3'/1'

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault-A viation Model Falcon 2000 and Falcon 2000EX ,\!f1NG

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

During the overhaul of a Main Landing Gear (MLG) of a Falcon 2000, the

sleeve on the hydraulic flow restrictor in the shock absorber was found

displaced, because of the rupture of its three retaining screws. * * *

Failure of the retaining screws has been determined to be the final phase

of a slow unscrewing process under normal operational conditions. The

unsafe condition only exists once the three screws have failed .

• • • • • • •

The unsafe condition is failure of three retaining screws of the MLG shock absorber,

which could adversely affect the structural integrity of these airplanes. We are issuing
#### Glenn Steven HANES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D16-1550

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed November 1, 2017

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and EMAS, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Glen Steven Hanes appeals from a final judgment of conviction and sentence following a negotiated written plea agreement. Hanes argues that because the plea colloquy was not thorough, the plea is involuntary.

> Generally, to obtain appellate review of a plea of guilty or no contest, the defendant must .specifically reserve dispositive issues for appeal or file a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court. Burns v. State, 884 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Following a guilty or no contest plea, a defendant may appeal only the trial court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction; a violation of a plea agreement, if preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; an involuntary plea, if preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; and a ■ sentencing error, if. preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A); Liebman v. State, 853 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). ... An issue relating to the voluntary and intelligent nature of the plea falls within the limited class of issues which a defendant may raise on appeal from a guilty or no contest plea without having specifically reserved the right to do so. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla. 1979); Burns, 884 So.2d at 1013. However, before raising such an issue on appeal, the defendant must first file a motion .to withdraw the plea with the trial court.

Garcia-Manriquez v. State, 146 So.3d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (quoting Hicks v. State, 915 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140. Hanes concedes that he did not timely file *1074a motion to withdraw the plea. As such, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. We therefore dismiss without prejudice for Hanes to pursue appropriate post-conviction remedies.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 135245(50) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135245 COA: 270525 Macomb CC: 2005-003694-FC THOMAS VINCENT MACLEAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 26, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

K ELLY , J., would grant the moti on for reconsideration.

d0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          37,146
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  541,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,432
<INVENTORY>                                    345,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               963,590
<PP&E>                                       1,749,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                 847,153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,431,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          550,840
<BONDS>                                        479,915
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,438
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,431,321
<SALES>                                      2,462,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,462,814
<CGS>                                        1,789,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,789,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,558
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,615
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                213,230
<INCOME-TAX>                                    77,253
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Proposed Additions to the Procurement List; Correction

    In the document appearing on page 23077, FR Doc. 98-10965, in the 
issue of April 24, 1998, in the second column, the service listed as 
``Base Supply Centers, Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina'' should 
read ``Operation of Individual Equipment Element and Hazardous 
Materials Store, Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina.''
Beverly L. Milkman,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-11629 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
#### COM. v. SHOWALTER, E.

1805 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/29/2017

CP-67-CR-0003661-2015

(York)

Affirmed