alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|West Virginia Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|West Virginia Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 159,504 | 142,860 | 139,961
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 147,854 | 141,090 | 146,455 | 126,986 | 122,267 | 117,136 | 113,084 | 115,974 | 111,480 | 109,652
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 113,179 | 115,361 | 129,753 | 142,082 | 165,341 | 174,165 | 171,825 | 184,025 | 202,934 | 221,268
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 243,116 | 255,067 | 263,187 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable Michael Krancer, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 Dear Secretary Krancer: 

### JAij,

## 1 82013

On November 27, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection (DEP). This SIP revision pertains to the update ofthe Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for the Lancaster Eight-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Maintenance Plan. Revisions to the MVEBs consist ofan update to the budgets with the use ofthe MOVES2010 model. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing itto prepare a direct final rulemaking notice. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr at 215- 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director Bureau ofAir Quality, PADEP Sincerely,

_Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division



# V Printedon I00% recycled/recyclablepaper with I00%post-consumer fiber and process clllorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Norman Elmer, Plaintiff, and Donna Zurek, Appellant, v Addaie K. Amankwaah, Respondent.

[769 NYS2d 419]

— Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Shaheen, J.), entered December 19, 2002, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and dismissed the second cause of action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the second cause of action with respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and significant limitation of use of a body function or system categories of serious injury within the *1351meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint to the extent that plaintiffs allege therein that Donna Zurek (plaintiff) sustained a serious injury under the categories of permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member and significant limitation of use of a body function or system *(see*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Defendant’s motion was not supported by medical evidence in admissible form with respect to those two categories and thus defendant failed to meet his initial burden *(see Trieger v Kinsella,*309 AD2d 1223 [2003]; *Dumont v Peterson Trust,*307 AD2d 709, 710 [2003]; *cf. Cook v Franz,*309 AD2d 1234 [2003]). We further conclude, however, that the court properly granted that part of the motion with respect to the permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system and 90/180 categories of serious injury. The deposition testimony of plaintiff submitted by defendant in support of the motion establishes both that she did not sustain a total loss of use of her cervical spine *(see Oberly v Bangs Ambulance,*96 NY2d 295, 297 [2001]) and that her usual and customary daily activities were not curtailed for the requisite period of time *(see generally Parkhill v Cleary,*305 AD2d 1088, 1089-1090 [2003]), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to either category.

We therefore modify the order by denying the motion in part and reinstating the second cause of action with respect to the permanent consequential limitation of use and significant limitation of use categories of serious injury. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Arkansas Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Arkansas Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 2,334,761
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,179,835 | 2,199,198 | 2,193,258 | 2,353,378 | 2,801,918 | 2,546,781 | 2,737,292 | 2,799,272 | 2,414,107 | 2,449,383
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,251,967 | 2,249,579 | 1,959,151 | 2,019,401 | 1,936,032 | 1,890,519 | 1,835,843 | 2,238,097 | 2,293,519 | 2,387,253
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,557,661 | 2,468,477 | 2,579,393 | 2,602,896 | 2,488,219 | 1,800,224 | 1,447,881 | 1,413,615 | 1,446,286 | 1,503,850
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,478,592 | 1,428,577 | 1,392,058 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Oklahoma Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Oklahoma Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.9   | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
|       | (1)    |       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |
|                           | (2)    |                           | The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.             |

| November 15, 2010 | /S/ PENG K. LIM               |
|-------------------|-------------------------------|
|              | Peng K. Lim                   |
|              | Chief Executive Officer       |
|              | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
#### COM. v. AMBROSE, J.

2227 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/03/2017

CP-51-CR-0008198-2011 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,744
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (3,818)
<INVENTORY>                                     53,888
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,191
<PP&E>                                          73,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,319)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           831
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,971
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,508
<SALES>                                        117,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,667
<CGS>                                           79,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,893
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### State v. Townsend

110,570

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Delaware Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Delaware Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 39,248
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 37,742 | 41,760 | 40,864 | 43,788 | 52,304 | 54,864 | 46,232 | 47,619 | 40,057 | 45,009
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 47,052 | 57,771 | 55,660 | 47,731 | 50,453 | 49,725 | 44,970 | 47,917 | 49,964 | 42,862
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 56,107 | 76,666 | 84,744 | 92,727 | 92,888 | 72,391 | 80,985 | 74,701 | 68,692 | 69,985
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 68,691 | 65,623 | 69,843 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1422 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

103d CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1422

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
103d CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1422

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interpose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Court of Federal Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment on any 
claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United 
States with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New 
Mexico or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise 
which were acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate 
compensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate 
compensation, the United States Court of Federal Claims may award 
interest at a rate of 5 percent per year to accrue from the date on 
which such lands or interests therein were acquired from the tribe by 
the United States. Such jurisdiction is conferred only with respect to 
claims accruing on or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must 
be filed within three years after the date of enactment of this Act. 
Such jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any failure of the tribe 
to exhaust any available administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority, with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      12), 1994.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
```
409PA15

#### Gregory P. Nies and Diane S. Nies v. Town of Emerald Isle, a North Carolina Municipality

*Amici Curiae's*Motion to Withdraw and Substitute North Carolina Counsel

Allowed 06/22/2016
Exhibit 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)
                           Homecomings Financial, LLC
                RAMP Series 2006-RS1 Trust (the "Issuing Entity")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director