alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10566 Summary Calendar

__________________ MICHAEL DWAYNE BENDER, Petitioner-Appellant,
versus WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94CV00413
- - - - - - - - - - January 24, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Michael Dwayne Bender appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that the indictment for aggravated robbery was fundamentally defective because it failed to assert a necessary element of the offense and that his guilty pleas were unknowing and involuntary because they were premised on the misadvice of counsel.No. 95-10566 -2- We have reviewed the arguments and the record and perceive no reversible error. We affirm the district court's dismissal of Bender's petition. AFFIRMED.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 08

- 00632

- CR

Ronald David ARRIAGA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- CR

- 0619

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr.

, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2009

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the above numbered appeal by withdrawing his

n otices of appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# C_2019031EN.01000401.xml

| 25.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/4

---

Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)

(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 31/06)

| Organisation | Reference | Edition number | Title of the Community specifications | Edition date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Eurocontrol (2) | Spec-0106 | 4.3 | Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3) | 18.12.2017 |

Organisation

Reference

Edition number

Title of the Community specifications

Edition date

Eurocontrol (2)

Spec-0106

4.3

Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3)

18.12.2017

---

(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, B-1130 Brussels, phone +32 27299011, fax +32 27299044.

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/eurocontrol-specification-line-data-interchange-oldi

---
Proposed naming convention for all API data 

The aim is to use uniform naming convention for all experiments and ME performed for API project. We propos

code: Experiment Position 

Type 1st Location 2nd Season 3rd + 4th 5th Mode 6th 7th 8thMEAtlanta A S-Summer W-winter ME number (01, etc) M-main P- 5 min 

B-breath 

Under score 

Replicate number 

BreathB-pea

MEChicago C S-Summer W-winter ME number M-main P- 5 min 

B-breath 

Under score 

Replicate number 

BreathB-pea

MEHouston H S-Summer W-winter ME number M-main P- 5 min 

B-breath 

Under score 

Replicate number 

BreathB-peapost; denud

trailing Vehicle 

V S-Summer 

W-winter 

Fuel (a,c,h) + vehicle (ttruck, s-sedan) 

MalFunction (F) Normal (N) 

Under score 

High (H), Low (L) vent, or coMbined (m) 

BackgA; Idle-C 

Residence w/attached garage 

R S-Summer 

W-winter 

Fuel (a,c,h) + vehicle (ttruck, s-sedan) 

MalFunction (F) Normal (N) 

Under score 

Kichen (K) or Garage(G) location 

BackgA; Ma

For example: AS02M_1 means Atlanta, summer, ME#2, first replicate. HW11B_3B means Houston, winter, M

peak VWasN_HC means trailing vehicle, winter, Atlanta fuel, sedan, normal mode, high vent, idle. RSctF_KA mChicago fuel, truck, malfunction, kitchen, background
#### Apollo L. HARDIN, Doc #R27963, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3375

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.
#### Joseph Michael DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-5041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 14, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Darlene F. Dickey, Judge.

DISMISSED.
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      April 15, 2010 |   |                        /s/ Dennis Tan |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Dennis      Tan, President, CEO and Director(Principal      Executive Officer)                                             |

----
#### IN RE: Francisco Javier HERNANDEZ and Jacqueline Marie Hernandez, Debtors. Francisco Javier Hernandez, AKA Francisco Hernandez; Jacqueline Marie Hernandez, AKA Jacqueline Hernandez, Appellants, v. Martha G. Bronitsky, Chapter 13 Trustee, Appellee.

No. 17-60043

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 2018 *

Filed March 23, 2018

Mark W. Lapham, Esquire, Attorney, Law Offices of Mark W. Lapham, Danville, CA, for Appellants

Leo George Spanos, Attorney, Chapter 13 Trustee, Hayward, CA, for Appellee

*809Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Chapter 13 debtors Francisco Javier Hernandez and Jacqueline Marie Hernandez appeal pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) order dismissing their appeal for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). We have an independent obligation to determine our jurisdiction over this appeal before proceeding to the merits. *Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Med.*Grp., 782 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 2015). We dismiss this appeal as moot.

During the pendency of this appeal, we dismissed for lack of jurisdiction debtors’ separate appeal challenging the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their bankruptcy case. Because the bankruptcy court’s dismissal order has become final, there is no effective relief we can give to debtors in this appeal and we dismiss this appeal as moot. *See Castaic Partners II, LLC v. Daca-Castaic, LLC (In re Castaic Partners II, LLC),*823 F.3d 966, 968-69 (9th Cir. 2016) (“The test for mootness of an appeal is whether the appellate court can give the appellant any effective relief in the event that it decides the matter on the merits in his favor” (citation omitted)).

Because we dismiss the appeal as moot, we do not consider debtors’ arguments addressing the underlying merits of the appeal.

DISMISSED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1302

To designate the Federal building in Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘Charles

E. Bennett Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 28 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

JULY 29 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building in Jacksonville, Florida,

as the ‘‘Charles E. Bennett Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal Building at 400 Bay Street in Jackson5 ville, Florida, is designated as the ‘‘Charles E. Bennett

6 Federal Building’’. If a new Federal building is built in

7 Jacksonville, Florida, to replace the building at 400 Bay
2

S 1302 RCS

1 Street, the new Federal building shall be designated as

2 the ‘‘Charles E. Bennett Federal Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

5 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

6 Federal building referred to in section 1 is deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘Charles E. Bennett Federal Building’’.

Æ
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Missouri Natural Gas % of Total Commercial Delivered for the Account of Others  (Percent)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7.7   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 14.0   | 14.1   | 14.5   | 15.4   | 16.7   | 16.7   | 17.8   | 20.1   | 21.7   | 21.4  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 20.0   | 19.2   | 20.0   | 19.5   | 22.6   | 22.9   | 23.6   | 23.1   | 22.5   | 23.3  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 23.5   | 26.9   | 30.8   | 27.7   | 29.5   | 28.8   | 27.9   | 28.3   | 25.9   | 26.4  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 28.3   | 28.0   | 27.6   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Gerald RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3180

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017.

Rehearing Denied December 13, 2017

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Rodriguez appeals from the judgment and sentence entered following the revocation of probation for the 2012 count of manufacturing marijuana, for which the trial court originally accepted his plea and withheld adjudication while he served the probationary sentence. We affirm the revocation and the judgment and sentence that were entered without further comment, but because the order of revocation does not specify the conditions Rodriguez admitted violating, we remand for the entry of an order specifying those conditions. See Huggins v. State, 216 So.3d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert TaubRobert TaubChief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Ilanit TamanIlanit TamanCorporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 155 ) ll-E-11 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM

Sheet 155 of 264P. 2 12/17/9 7 WE

D 07:0 6 FA

X 219522704 2 12.-IB / 9 * 1S:U 4 ©1919941023 4 MILLENNIU M PRODUCT

S PES RT P N C ©00 1 CiloiU2/02

7 

### A 9 4 5 Z

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t Rober t Jemison , Pacifi c Environmenta l S e Decembe r 16,199 7 Mr . Earl H . Mille

r MillenniumProducts , Inc . Telephon e Number : (219 ) 293-384 0 Fa x Number : (219)522-704 2 ContactSummary : Mr . Ear l H . Mille r wa s contacte dt o updat

e infonnatio n provide di n th e 199 3 EPA Reinforce d Plastic/Composite s Screenin g Surve y submitte db y MillenniumProducts , Inc . fo r thei r facilir y locate d i n Elkhart , Indiana . I n respons e t o m y question s Mr . Miller

indicate dth e following: Th e facilit y stil l use s th e hand lay-u

p fabrication proces s bu t

onl y fo r repairs . Th e volume o f resi n use d b y dii s fabricatio n techniqu e i s inconsequentia l comparedt o th e volum e use d i n th e non-atomize d mechanica

l spray-u p fabrication process . Th e toolin g resi n an dtoolin g ge l coat use d during th e han d lay-u

p fabrication proces s bot

h contain approximately 38 % styren e b y weigh L N o additiona l styrene i s added t

o th e resi n i n thi s fabricatio n process . N o additiona l styren e o r

metlvy l methacrylate i s adde d t o th e ge l coal i n thi s fabricatio n process . Th e facilir y use s non-atomizedmechanica l spray-u p (i.e . aflow-coater

) i n th e fabricatio n o f certai n products . Th e polyeste r resin appliedb y rhi s devic e contain s approximately 38 % styren e by weight . N o additiona

l styren e i s adde dto thi s resi n i n th e fabricatio n process . Th e facilit y use s non-aiomized mechanica l spray-up " (i.e . aflow-coater) t o appl y apolyester ge l coa t i n th e fabricatio n o f

certai n products . Th e polyeste r ge l coa t contain s approximatel y 38 % sryren e b y weight . N o additiona l sryrciie o r methyl methacrylat

e i s addedt o thi s ge l coa l i n th e fabricatio n process . Th e facUit y ha s discontinue dus e of

th e fabricatio n processe s know n a s reactiv e injectio n moldin g (RIM5an d resi n transfe r molding (RTM) ^

INFORMATIO N I S ACCUR A
#### COM. v. AMY, W.

1813 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/17/2017

CP-14-CR-0002090-2014

(Centre)

Affirmed
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Michigan  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Michigan  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.07   | 4.22   | 4.07   | 3.97   | 3.41   | 3.24  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.12   | 3.08   | 3.04   | 2.89   | 2.70   | 2.61   | 2.90   | 2.99   | 2.80   | 2.83  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.23   | 4.08   | 4.10   | 5.32   | 6.34   | 8.44   | 8.34   | 8.06   | 9.22   | 7.24  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7.07   | 6.18   | 5.50   | 4.91   | 5.54   | 4.23   | 3.57   | 3.57   | 3.48   | 3.17  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.78   | 3.49   | 5.09   | 4.20   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

## COpy r 

## INFü 7 011R
MAY 172010 Dr. Donald F. Schwartz, MD, MPH Deputy Mayor, Health and Opportunity Health Commissioner Philadelphia Department ofPublic Health 1401 JFK Boulevard, Room 600 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 Dear Dr. Schwartz: By letter andenclosures dated April 9, 2010, PhiladelphiaAir Management Services (AMS) submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

— Region III (EPA) a data substitutionpackage for the Northeast Airport ambient air ozone monitoring site (AIRS ID# 42- 101-0024) in accordance withthe regulatory requirements of40 CFR Part 50 Appendix I. 2.3(b)

—National Primary and SecondaryAmbient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFRPart 50 Appendix I 2.3 (b) requires: .When computing whether the minimum data completeness requirements have been met, meteorological or ambient datamaybe sufficientto demonstrate that meteorological conditions on missing days were not conducive to concentrations above the level ofthe standard. Missing days assumed less thenthe level ofthe standard are counted forthe purpose ofmeeting the.minimum data completeness requirement, subjectto the approval ofthe appropriate Regional Administrator.” The AMS data substitution package contained documentation and analysis showing that meteorological conditions for the missing days was not conducive to forming elevated concentrations ofground-level ozone which would have exceeded the 8-hour ozone standard of 0.O75ppm. This was substantiated by AMS providing information showing reported ozone concentrations at nearby monitoring sites well below the 8-hour ozone standard forthe missing days. Based on ourreview, EPA hereby approves AMS’s request to allow missing ambient air ozone concentrations forthe following days ofSeptember and October in 2009 be counted when calculating yearly data completeness requirements ofthe CFR:

# { Dates Day Count 9/16/09—9/17/09 2 9/19/09 

# ) I 9/26/09

- 1 9/29/09

— 10/2/09 4. 10/4/09— 10/8/09 5 10/11/09 —10/26/09 16 TOTAL 29
Ifyou have any questions regarding this approval action, please feel free to contact Mr. David Arnold, Acting Director; Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-2172 or Mr. Walter K. Wilkie, Associate Director ofthe Office ofAir Monitoring and Analysis, at (215) 814- 2150.

cc: Ms. Joyce Epps Director, PADEP

Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100% post-consumerfiber andprocess chlorinefree. CustomerService Hotline: 1-800-438-2474 Regional Admini
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the period ending
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Glenn A. Kleinert, as  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 7,  2004



/s/        Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and

Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA - 2015 - 6542 Directorate Identifier: 2015NM038AD

190 - 36 - 0023, R02 --- 4/30/14 190 - 36 - 0023, R01 --- 9/3/13 190 - 36 - 0023 --- 7/22/13 190 - 21 - 0041, R01 --- 12/20/12 190 - 21 - 0041 --- 9/27/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008