alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Missouri Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Missouri Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 494    | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1      | 0      | 0      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000063814
<NAME>                        MAXXAM Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         210,000
<SECURITIES>                                   95,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                  403,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,800
<INVENTORY>                                    492,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,355,900
<PP&E>                                         2,328,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,022,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,427,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          793,500
<BONDS>                                        1,948,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    300
<COMMON>                                       5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,427,400
<SALES>                                        1,854,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,854,600
<CGS>                                          1,508,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,508,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                2,000
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.22)



</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOHN RODES INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC , Appella nt /Cross

- Appellee ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2933 LT Case No. 2019

- CA

- 038287 S ENTR Y VIEW SYSTEMS, INC. ,

Appellee /Cross -Ap pellant

. ________________________________/ Dec ision filed Ju ly 19 , 2022 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for Brevard County , Davi d Dugan, Judge. M ari o G. M enoc al, of Block & Scarpa, A ttorneys at Law, Ver o Beac h, for Appellant /Cross -A ppellee

. Timothy W. Sobcz ak, of Dean, Mead, E gerton, Bloodworth, C apouano & B ozarth, P.A., O rlando, f or A ppellee /Cr oss -Ap pellant

. P ER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT , C.J. , EISNAUGL E an d NARDELLA , JJ., concur.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                               
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                         
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|North Carolina Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|North Carolina Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 145    | 143   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 142    | 64     | 62     | 61     | 76     | 71     | 81     |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 112    | 113    | 116    | 122    | 127    | 131    | 135    | 113    | 114    | 107   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 106    | 98     | 98     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that non-defense, non-security, nonveterans discretionary spending should be reduced by 20 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. QUAYLE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committees on 

Oversight and Government Reform and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress that non-defense, nonsecurity, non-veterans discretionary spending should be 

reduced by 20 percent. 

Whereas total Government spending in fiscal year 2010 exceeded $3.5 trillion; 

Whereas the 111th Congress failed to adopt a budget resolution; 

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that total 

Federal spending in fiscal year 2011 will reach $3.71 trillion; 

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the 

fiscal year 2011 budget deficit will exceed $1.47 trillion; 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 14 IH 

Whereas the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the 

fiscal year 2012 budget deficit will reach $1.1 trillion; 

Whereas, since fiscal year 2008, non-defense discretionary 

spending has increased by 84 percent; and 

Whereas the Federal debt is expected to exceed $14.3 trillion 

in April 2011: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that— 

3 (1) non-defense, non-security, non-veterans dis4 cretionary spending by the Government in fiscal year 

5 2011 should be reduced by 20 percent from fiscal 

6 year 2010 spending levels; and 

7 (2) if the percentage reduction specified in 

8 paragraph (1) is not achieved, rates of basic pay for 

9 individuals serving in the executive and legislative 

10 branches of the Government, respectively, should be 

11 reduced by 15 percent, beginning in fiscal year 

12 2012. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6602

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWIGHT ROLLAND SHELTON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-149, CA-96-424-5)

Submitted: August 14, 1997 Decided: August 25, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwight Rolland Shelton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Shelton, Nos. CR-92-149; CA-96-424-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 18,

1997).

In addition, Appellant attempts to assert a claim raised for

the first time in his objections to the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation, contending that the district court erred in

imposing a sentence for "crack" cocaine when Appellant pled guilty

to a powder cocaine offense. Appellant's claim was not raised in

his § 2255 motion, and he never made a motion to amend his initial

filing. In any event, the claim is factually unsupported in the

record. Further, nonconstitutional claims that could have been

raised on appeal, but were not, may not be asserted in collateral

proceedings. See Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 477 n.10 (1976);

United States v. Emanuel, 869 F.2d 795, 796 (4th Cir. 1989). A

district court's technical application of the sentencing guidelines

is a nonconstitutional claim. See United States v. Marin, 961 F.2d

493, 496 (4th Cir. 1992). Because Appellant's claim alleges nonconstitutional error and could properly have been raised on appeal,

his claim has been waived.
3

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1302 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 198

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1302

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the Federal building in Jacksonville, Florida, as the 
                ``Charles E. Bennett Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 198
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1302

  To designate the Federal building in Jacksonville, Florida, as the 
                ``Charles E. Bennett Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 28 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

                July 29 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

  Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

           September 14 (legislative day, September 7), 1993

               Reported by Mr. Baucus, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building in Jacksonville, Florida, as the 
                ``Charles E. Bennett Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Building at 400 Bay Street in Jacksonville, Florida, is 
designated as the ``Charles E. Bennett Federal Building''. If a new 
Federal building is built in Jacksonville, Florida, to replace the 
building at 400 Bay Street, the new Federal building shall be 
designated as the ``Charles E. Bennett Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Charles E. Bennett 
Federal Building''.
```
#### Tanya Dawn HANSEN, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and Manuela Ingrid Wendeborn, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-2696

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

Administrative Appeal from the Florida Department of Revenue.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 4.1




	
  

  	
  CLASS A COMMON
  STOCK VNTV SECRETARY SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
  DEFINITIONS COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST
  COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE PRESIDENT CUSIP 92210H 10 5 Delaware 2009 Vantiv,
  Inc. THIS CERTIFIES THAT IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF FULLY PAID AND
  NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK, $0.00001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE,
  OF VANTIV, INC. transferable on the books of the
  Corporation in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of the
  certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
  countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. WITNESS
  the facsimile seal of the Corporation and facsimile signatures of its duly
  authorized officers. Dated: INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
  DELAWARE 

  






 















	
  

  	
  THE SIGNATURE
  TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
  THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
  CHANGE WHATEVER. TEN COM — as tenants in common TEN ENT
  — as tenants by the entireties JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of
  survivorship and not as tenants in common UNIF GIFT
  MIN ACT — Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform
  Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though
  not in the above list. Class A Common Stock The following abbreviations, when
  used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed
  as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
  NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
  INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
  UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM),
  PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
  SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer
  unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
  (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
  shares of the Class A Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and
  do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said
  stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of
  substitution in the premises. Dated THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY
  STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE
  DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF
  EACH CLASS AND SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE BEEN
  DETERMINED, AND OF THE AUTHORITY, IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES
  INTO CLASSES OR SERIES AND TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS,
  PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE
  TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS
  CERTIFICATE.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1104 

To amend the Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration 

Authorization Act of 1978 to require the appointment of a member 

of the Science Advisory Board based on the recommendation of the 

Secretary of Agriculture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Mr. STUTZMAN (for himself and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and 

Technology 

A BILL 

To amend the Environmental Research, Development, and 

Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 to require the 

appointment of a member of the Science Advisory Board 

based on the recommendation of the Secretary of Agriculture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Representation for 

5 Farmers Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1104 IH

1 SEC. 2. SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD. 

2 Section 8(b) of the Environmental Research, Devel3 opment, and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1978 

4 (42 U.S.C. 4365(b)) is amended in the first sentence by 

5 inserting ‘‘and not more than 3 of whom shall be ap6 pointed based on the recommendation of the Secretary of 

7 Agriculture,’’ after ‘‘Chairman,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-1767-001]


Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., Notice of Filing

May 1, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 8, 1998, Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., 
filed supplemental information to Rate Schedule No. 1 to comply with 
Ordering Paragraph (F) of the Commission's order issued March 30, 1998, 
in Tenaska Frontier Partners, Ltd., Docket No. ER97-1767-000 (82 FERC 
para. 61,323).
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions and 
protests should be filed on or before May 11, 1998. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission to determine the appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12121 Filed 5-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M