alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1107 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1107

                  For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2011

  Mr. Filner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ.

    (a) Payment.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of funds 
not otherwise appropriated, an appropriate amount to compensate Adrian 
Rodriguez for costs related to and damages arising from his arrest, 
prosecution, and incarceration in Mexico in 2003 as described in Claim 
No. 05-370C filed in the United States Court of Federal Claims.
    (b) Satisfaction of Claims.--The payment under subsection (a) shall 
be in full satisfaction of all claims of Adrian Rodriguez against the 
United States in connection with the matter described in such 
subsection.
    (c) No Inference of Liability.--Nothing in this Act shall be 
construed as an inference of liability on the part of the United 
States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS' AND AGENTS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 
percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be paid to, or 
received by, any agent or attorney for any service rendered in 
connection with the payment under this Act.
    (b) Enforcement.--Any person who violates subsection (a) shall be 
guilty of an infraction and shall be fined under title 18, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019414EN.01001001.xml

| 10.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/10

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt apply

(2019/C 414/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Mohamed Zohir Mohamed Wahed Garrana and Mr Habib Ibrahim Habib Eladli who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt.

The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons. The above-mentioned persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the elements the Council holds in its file regarding their designation, before 19 December 2019, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

In this regard, the attention of the person concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list of designated persons in Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 76 22.3.2011, p. 63.

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Vince E. MOORE

No. 2016-KP-1555

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

1/9/2018

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE

PER CURIAM

^Denied. *See*La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; *State ex rel. Glover v. State,*93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Relator has now fully litigated two applications for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator’s claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136187 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136187 

 COA: 276597 

Wayne CC: 06-011295-01

LAFAYETTE GARTH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for a hearing pursuant to People v Ginther, 390 

Mich 436 (1973). 

d0903 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2008 

 Clerk
413P16

#### State v. Wesley Patterson

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1145)

Denied
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of R&R Acquisition I, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kirk
      Warshaw, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kirk
                  WarshawKirk
                  WarshawPrincipal
                      Financial Officer
                    March
                      27, 2006
# C_2019165EN.01000301.xml

| 14.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2019/C 165/03)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Citric acid | The People’s Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and of partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 15, 22.1.2015, p. 8). | 23.1.2020 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Citric acid

The People’s Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/82 of 21 January 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of citric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and of partial interim reviews pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 15, 22.1.2015, p. 8).

23.1.2020

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the quarter ending
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Glenn A. Kleinert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March
21, 2005





/s/ Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.2 Board of Directors Resolutions


Exhibit 10.2




HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

6409 Lake Meadow Drive

Burke, VA 22015




UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF DIRECTORS OF HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. IN LIEU OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. (A NEVADA CORPORATION)




Pursuant to the Authority granted to directors to take action by unanimous consent without a meeting pursuant to Nevada General Corporation Law 78.315 (pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation) of HPC POS System, Corp. (“HPC”) the Board of Directors (“Directors”) of HPC, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do hereby consent to adopt, ratify, confirm and approve, as of the date indicated below, the following recitals and resolutions, as evidenced by their signature hereunder:




WHEREAS, the Directors have been presented with the proposal to authorize the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for relief of debt owed by the Company in the amount of five thousand ($5,000) Dollars represented by a Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollar Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”) dated May 1, 2009;




WHEREAS, the Directors shall specifically authorize the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the EAD Consulting Inc.;




WHEREAS, the Directors believe it is in the best interest of the Company to authorize the issuance of the common stock to EAD Consulting Inc. in exchange for relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note as set forth herein;




NOW, BE IT RESOLVED, that it is hereby authorized and approved to issue 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the EAD Consulting Inc. in exchange for partial relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note.




GENERAL RESOLUTIONS




RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are hereby authorized and instructed to take whatever steps necessary to effectuate the above described resolutions.




FURTHER RESOLVED,  that the Promissory Note shall be restated and amended to show that a payment in the amount of $5,000 on the Promissory Note has been satisfied by the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set forth their hands in their capacity as of this 14th day of March, 2012.







	
	 


	/s/ Melvin W. Coles


	MELVIN W. COLES, DIRECTOR


	 


	 


	/s/ Bonnie Coles


	BONNIE COLES, DIRECTOR


	 


	 


	/s/ Deborah Colley


	DEBORAH COLLEY, DIRECTOR
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as
adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Arthur W. Hicks, Jr. the President, Chief Operating
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cybex International, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:

The Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2009



/s/ Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.Arthur W. Hicks, Jr.President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO CYBEX
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND WILL BE FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Arthur CARTER, Defendant-Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff-Below, Appellee.

No. 58, 2017

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: November 1, 2017

Decided: November 15, 2017

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, Cr. ID. No. 1306020689 (N)

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bridgetech Laboratories, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Landow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By /s/ Scott Landow


Scott Landow


Chief Executive Officer, President


April 15, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

            REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
China GrenTech Corporation Limited:


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of China GrenTech
Corporation Limited and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, all
expressed in Renminbi. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of China GrenTech
Corporation Limited and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), China Grentech Corporation Limited
and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2007, based on "criteria established in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO)", and our report dated October 27, 2008 expressed an adverse opinion on
the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007, have been translated into United States dollars solely for
the convenience of the reader. We have audited the translation and, in our
opinion, such consolidated financial statements expressed in Renminbi have been
translated into United States dollars on the basis set forth in Note 2(b) to the
consolidated financial statements.




/s/ KPMG

Hong Kong, China
October 27, 2008
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas Imports Price All Countries  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas Imports Price All Countries  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --     | 9.90   | 9.68  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9.10   | --     | 12.07  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
158P06-9

#### State v. Derrick Boger

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 09/20/2016
# C_2019049EN.01000102.xml

| 7.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9218 — CVC Capital Partners/K3)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 49/02)

On 29 January 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9218. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9218. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
389A15-2

#### State v. Tae Kwon Hammonds

Def’s Motion for Revision of Briefing Deadlines

Allowed 10/13/2016