alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<CAPTION>

<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                Apr-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<CASH>                              16964
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      194970
<ALLOWANCES>                        11254
<INVENTORY>                        126641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   352830
<PP&E>                             153570
<DEPRECIATION>                     100426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     842414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              202929
<BONDS>                            400039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            45409
<OTHER-SE>                         180908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       842414
<SALES>                            186505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   186505
<CGS>                               95406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      164695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    69289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   7684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     21810
<INCOME-TAX>                         8026
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 13784
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        13784
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.43



</TABLE>
f8k011012ex10iii_magnegas.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING


 


 


 


This memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into by and between


MagneGas Corporation


150 Rainville Road


Tarpon Springs, Florida 34689


(“MNGA”)


 


and


 


HYFUELS, INC.


35246 US HWY 19 N. #215


Palm Harbor, Florida 34684


(“HyFuels, Inc.”)


 


 


RECITALS


 


Whereas, MagneGas Corporation (“MNGA”) is a publicly traded corporation organized and existing under the law of the state of Delaware with its principle place of business in the state of Florida.


 


Whereas HyFuels Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the law of the state of Florida.


 


Whereas, MNGA is engaged in the business of generating gaseous fuel from liquid waste with its Plasma Arc Trough (“PAT”) Recyclers under U.S. patents and patent applications, as described in details in the website www.magnegas.com


 


Whereas, HyFuels Inc. is developing a new type of nuclear fusions without radiations and without radioactive waste known as intermediate controlled nuclear fusions (“ICNF”), U.S. and international patent applications pending, as described in details in the website:


www.santilli-foundation.org/icnf.php


 


Whereas, MNGA wants to acquire all world wide intellectual property rights for the ICNF and HyFuels, Inc. is interested in selling said rights.


 




  





  











  






 


THE PARTIES AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING


HyFuels Inc. hereby grants to MNGA an exclusive option for the purchase of all world wide intellectual rights on the ICNF Technology, including patents, patent applications, copyrights, domain names, know how. The purchase will occur at mutually acceptable terms and conditions and the exclusive option will expire on December 31, 2012. The exclusive option is being granted in exchange for the consideration to be given by MNGA to HyFuels, Inc. as described to Schedule A, attached hereto.


 


In Faith


MagneGas Corporation


 


 




	
/s/ Ruggero Maria Santilli

	 	 	
01-10-12

	 
	
Ruggero Maria Santilli 

	 	 	
Date

	 
	
CEO

	 	 	
 

	 







 


 


 


HyFuels Inc.


 


 





	
/s/ Ruggero Maria Santilli

	 	 	
01-10-12

	 
	
Ruggero Maria Santilli 

	 	 	
Date

	 
	
President

	 	 	
 

	 









 


 




  





  











  






 


 


Schedule A


 


Magnegas Corporation has provided to Hyfuels, Inc. the following supporting services since 2007:


 


- Use of an electronic panel for automatic control of the arc without payment of rent


 


- Use of 2 Miller Dimension 1000 AC/DC converters


 


- Telephone supposrt Services
232P16

#### State v. Jeremy Jerome Oliver

Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 7, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don E.
Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Don E. Marsh
--------------------------------------
Don E. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer
February 21, 2006
Opinion issued October 4, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-11-00785-CV

———————————

HENRY THOMAS FILLION, Appellant

V.

CAROLINE FILLION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-13170

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has 

issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
#### Irena CHARLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1490

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Jonathan D. Ohlman, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
# CITYOFTUPELO JACK REED, JR., MAYOR

April 30, 2012

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief EAS 

### &DomesticAnalysis Division Office ofAviation DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, S.E.**Washin~.t~rtLl'?·** C. 20590 RE: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP) Dear Mr. DeVany, I am writing in support ofSilverAirpways' proposal to provide commercial air service to the Tupelo Regional Airport. Citizens from Tupelo depend on the Tupelo Regional Airport for their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue in and out of Tupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements with Delta Airlines make this option very attractive to our citizens. In addition, the 30 to 50 seat aircraft are much more desirable than the 8 seat aircraft offered by Air Choice One. We are excited about this chance to return to profitability. Thankyou for considering ourcitizens in yourdeliberations.

JR/sew

/ _)
71 EAST TROY STREE;T • POST OFFICE BOX 1485 TUPELO, MISSlSSIPPI 38802-1485 TELEPHONE 662.841.6513 • FAX 662.840.2075 ,. ·, .. ,. ·,
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Oklahoma Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           | 1,899,450 | 1,688,769 | 1,948,032 | 1,893,472 | 1,871,683 | 1,974,291 | 2,063,748 | 2,142,148
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,161,773 | 2,052,001 | 1,912,747 | 1,947,980 | 1,833,300 | 1,716,804 | 1,634,508 | 1,607,058 | 1,576,582 | 1,500,694
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,516,103 | 1,526,499 | 1,500,319 | 1,483,410 | 1,571,414 | 1,551,906 | 1,597,048 | 1,687,039 | 1,782,021 | 1,788,665
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,706,697 | 1,754,838 | 1,883,532 | 1,851,159 | 2,161,221 | 2,336,191 | 2,293,872 | 2,316,693 | 2,625,239 | 2,750,595
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,415,939 | 2,297,451 | 2,507,460 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 684,842
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 684,518 | 717,070 | 714,216 | 748,074 | 749,018 | 748,792 | 750,054 | 759,365 | 759,153 | 776,964
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 776,822 | 776,845 | 774,309 | 774,309 | 774,309 | 771,422 | 760,619 | 760,619 | 760,619 | 760,619
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 760,619 | 760,619 | 760,629 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41051

Conference Calendar

 

RUBEN CHAPA-IBARRA, SR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ERNEST CHANDLER, Warden, United

States Penitentiary; UNITED STATES

OF AMERICA,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-897

--------------------

August 20, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ruben Chapa-Ibarra, Sr., federal prisoner #64530-080,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

habeas corpus petition. Chapa-Ibarra asserts that, pursuant to

the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, he is entitled to

assert in a habeas corpus petition his claim based on Richardson

v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 815-16 (1999). Chapa-Ibarra
No. 01-41051

-2-

contends that he was not found guilty of every element of his

continuing criminal enterprise offense because the jury was not

properly instructed under Richardson that it was required to

unanimously agree on which specific acts constituted his

continuing series of violations. As Chapa-Ibarra does not

challenge his convictions on any of the other grounds raised in

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, those claims have been waived. 

See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999). 

To trigger the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a habeas

petitioner’s claim: (1) must be “based on a retroactively

applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that the

petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense” and

(2) must have been “foreclosed by circuit law at the time when

the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial,

appeal, or first [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 motion.” Reyes-Requena v.

United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Because ChapaIbarra’s arguments do not amount to a claim that he was convicted

for conduct that did not constitute a crime, he has failed to

satisfy the first prong of the savings clause test. See Jeffers

v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830-31 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 122

S. Ct. 476 (2001). The district court’s judgment dismissing

Chapa-Ibarra’s habeas corpus petition is AFFIRMED.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Vermont Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Vermont Natural Gas Pipeline and Distribution Use  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9      | 8      | 8     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 14     | 15     | 16     | 15     | 17    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16     | 53     | 114    | 89     | 124    | 136    | 135    | 8      | 10     | 3     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14     | 2      | 2      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 97 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating 

to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal elections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2011 

Mr. YARMUTH (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to contributions and expenditures with 

respect to Federal elections. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 97 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Financial expenditures, or in kind 

3 equivalents, with respect to a candidate for Federal office, 

4 without regard to whether or not a communication ex5 pressly advocates the election or defeat of a specified can6 didate in the election, shall not constitute protected 

7 speech, as guaranteed by this Constitution or any amend8 ment to this Constitution. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have the power to enact 

10 a mandatory public financing system to provide funds to 

11 qualified candidates in elections for Federal office, which 

12 shall be the sole source of funds raised or spent with re13 spect to Federal elections. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall set forth a legal public 

15 holiday for the purposes of voting in regularly scheduled 

16 general elections for Federal office.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing
Owner of World Monitor Trust III  Series J (Registrant), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer        
|Kenneth A. Shewer            
|Co-Chief Executive Officer   
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|March 30, 2007