alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.37




 Exhibit 10.37 
 AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 The Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between TechTarget, Inc. and Don Hawk (the
“Executive”) which took effect January 1, 2007 (“Agreement”) is hereby amended pursuant to this Amendment and Waiver to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amendment and Waiver”). This Amendment and Waiver
shall be effective as of January 10, 2012. 
 The parties, for good and valuable consideration, the
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 Section 2, “Capacity,” is hereby amended and restated as follows: 



Capacity. The Executive shall serve the Employer as Executive Director, Product Innovation. The Executive shall
also serve the Employer in such other or additional offices as the Executive may be requested to serve by the Chief Operating Officer. In such capacity or capacities, the Executive shall perform such services and duties in connection with the
business, affairs and operations of the Employer as may be assigned or delegated to the Executive from time to time, consistent with the Executive’s education and experience, by or under the authority of the Chief Operating Officer. The
Executive shall report directly to the Chief Operating Officer.” 
  

	2.	 Pursuant to Section 14 of the Agreement, the Executive by signing below hereby waives any claim that the amendment to the Agreement described
in paragraph 1 above constitutes “Good Reason”, as such term is defined in Section 6(c) of the Agreement, including without limitation, “Good Reason” as defined in Section 6(c)(ii) of the Agreement.



  

	3.	 Except as expressly provided herein, the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unmodified. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall
have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. This Amendment and Waiver shall be governed by the same provisions as set forth in Section 17 of the Agreement. If any part of this Amendment and Waiver is held by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue with full force and effect. 



[Remainder of the Page Intentionally Left Blank] 








 This Amendment and Waiver has been agreed to and executed by the following
parties on the dates set forth opposite their names: 
  

							
		 	/s/ DON HAWK	 	Date:	  	January 10, 2012
		 	Don Hawk	 		  	
		 	TechTarget, Inc.	 		  	
				
	By:	 	/s/ GREG STRAKOSCH	 	Date:	  	January 10, 2012
		 	 Greg Strakosch
 Chief Executive
Officer
	 		  	

 Signature Page to Amendment and Waiver 

to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
Exhibit
        15.1
 
 McMoRan
        Exploration Co.
 1615
        Poydras St.
 New
        Orleans, La. 70112
 
 May
        1,
        2006
 
 To
        the
        Board of Directors and Stockholders of McMoRan Exploration Co.:
 
 We
        are
        aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
        Forms
        S-3 (File Nos. 333-121779, 333-95195 and 333-108408) and Forms S-8 (File
        Nos.
        333-57484, 333-67485, 333-87380, 333-90170, 333-105533, 333-115335 and
        333-124740) of McMoRan Exploration Co. of our report dated May 1, 2006 relating
        to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of McMoRan
        Exploration Co. that is included in its Form10-Q for the quarter ended March
        31,
        2006.
 
 
 Very
        truly yours,
 
 /s/Ernst
        & Young LLP
#### COM. v. ALLEYNE, A.

3468 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/07/2017

CP-46-CR-0000906-2014

(Montgomery)

Affirmed
|                                                                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                    
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                                              
|View History:                                                                                     
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Lake Charles, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Malaysia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  
|                                                                                                  
|Price of Lake Charles, LA Natural Gas LNG Imports from Malaysia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.36  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | 3.43   | 4.97   | 4.93   | 10.00  | --     |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Inkelaar

111,246

10/07/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Minnesota Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 5,427  | 3,663  | 4,800  | 1,770  | 4,523  | 3,424  | 1,043  | 2,488  | 949    | 6,916 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,670  | 6,044  | 3,380  | 5,864  | 5,537  | 4,731  | 5,861  | 1,715  | 1,269  | 983   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,340  | 1,103  | 1,302  | 3,555  | 2,933  | 1,743  | 1,793  | 2,941  | 2,780  | 1,798 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,005  | 2,235  | 1,463  | 2,261  | 3,683  | 1,868  | 1,594  | 1,726  | 2,671  | 2,523 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,172  | 1,403  | 1,794  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|No chart available.                                                     
|No chart available.                                                     
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
### Opinion issued April 21 , 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— 

### NO. 01 - 22 - 00101 - CR

——————————— IN RE ROBERT GLENN DAVIS , Relat or Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION2



### Relator, Robert Glenn Davis, has filed another petition for writ of mandamus 1 

### challenging the trial court’s refusal to respond to relator’s request pursuant to the Texas Open Records Act. 2 

### As stated in our previous opinions, relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Section 552.028 states that “a governmental body is not required to accept or comply with a request for information from .
. . an individual who is imprisoned or confined in a correctional facility
. . . .” T EX 

### . G OV 

### ’ T 

### C ODE 

### § 552.028. Documents attached to relator’s petition indicate that he is an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Accordingly, the trial court had no duty to rule on relator’s request for information. We deny the petition . Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Guerra. Do not publish. T EX 

### . R. A PP 

### . P. 47.2(b).

1 Relator has filed three previous petitions for writ of mandamus raising exactly the same complaint, which were all denied. See In re Davis , No. 01

- 20

- 00258

- CR, 2020 WL 1681174 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 7, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In r e Davis , No. 01

- 19

- 00907

- CV, 2020 WL 1144673 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 10, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Davis , No. 01

- 19

- 00246

- CV, 2019 WL 2292633 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] May 30, 2019, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
2 The underlying case is State v. Robert Glenn Davis , cause number 903461 , pending in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Abigail Anastasio presiding.
EX 10.1 Summary Sheet for Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2012






EXHIBIT 10.1




Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2012


Employment Status


Pursuant to the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, the employees of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the "Bank"), including the Bank's chief executive officer, the chief operating officer, the chief financial officer and other current named executive officers as of December 31, 2011 (Dean Schultz, Lisa B. MacMillen, Kenneth C. Miller, Steven T. Honda, Lawrence H. Parks, Suzanne Titus-Johnson and David H. Martens) (the “named executive officers”), are “at will” employees. The named executive officers may resign at any time and the Bank may terminate their employment at any time for any reason or no reason, with or without cause and with or without notice. 


Each of the named executive officers receives a base salary and is eligible to participate in the Bank's executive incentive compensation plans and comprehensive benefit programs, including both qualified and nonqualified retirement benefit plans. Subject to review by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, base salaries for 2012 for the named executive officers are: Dean Schultz: $795,900; Lisa B. MacMillen: $509,800; Kenneth C. Miller: $415,000; Steven T. Honda: $357,100, Lawrence H. Parks: $411,400; Suzanne Titus-Johnson: $368,700 and David H. Martens, $357,100.


Senior officers, including the named executive officers, are also eligible to receive reimbursement for financial planning, health club membership, and parking expenses incurred each year up to a maximum amount of $12,000 annually per officer. On occasion, the Bank may pay for resort activities for employees, including our named executive officers, in connection with business-related meetings; and in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses/partners accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The President receives use of a Bank-owned vehicle.


A Bank employee, including the named executive officers, may receive severance benefits in the event that the employee's employment is terminated because the employee's job or position is eliminated or because the job or position is substantially modified so that the employee is no longer qualified or cannot perform the revised job. For the named executive officers, severance under the Bank's current policy would be equal to the greater of (i) 12 weeks of the officer's base salary, or (ii) the sum of three weeks of the officer's base salary plus three weeks of the officer's base salary for each full year of service and three weeks of base salary prorated for each partial year of service at the Bank to a maximum of 52 weeks. The Bank's current severance policy also provides one month of continued health and life insurance benefits and, at the Bank's discretion, outplacement assistance.
270P16

#### Matthew Nereim v. Ryan Cummins; City Chevrolet Automotive Company; Hendrick Luxury Collision Center, LLC; National General Insurance Company; and each of them

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1253)

Denied
#### Steven Mark RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-4758

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 16, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(a)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, Dennis J. Kuester, Chief Executive Officer of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:    November 9, 2004.


                              /s/ Dennis J. Kuester
                              ______________________________

                              Dennis J. Kuester
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW845568_2.doc
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         299,888
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,508,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,908,166
<INVENTORY>                                  8,231,834
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,054,188
<PP&E>                                      10,801,999
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,638,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,831,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,104,215
<BONDS>                                      4,744,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,047,349
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,200,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,831,715
<SALES>                                     30,886,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,886,253
<CGS>                                        8,770,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,080,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               420,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,384,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,285,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,099,920
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
No. D-2686.

#### In re Disbarment of Mahler.

[For earlier order herein, see 567 U. S. 959.]

Disbarment entered.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 60

  Expressing the sense of Congress that United States commercial air 
carriers should provide certain benefits to members of the Armed Forces 
 who are traveling on official military orders and are being deployed 
         overseas or are returning from an overseas deployment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 16, 2011

   Mr. Denham (for himself, Mr. Pierluisi, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. 
 Braley of Iowa, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Carnahan, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Guinta, Mr. 
   Gowdy, Mr. Schilling, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Runyan, Mr. 
McKeon, Mr. Shuster, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Quayle, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Reed, 
 Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Heck, Mr. Mack, Mr. Dold, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Harris, 
Mr. Nugent, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Kissell, 
  Mr. Costa, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Mica, Mr. Smith of 
 Washington, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. Coble, Mr. Richmond, and Mrs. 
   Ellmers) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that United States commercial air 
carriers should provide certain benefits to members of the Armed Forces 
 who are traveling on official military orders and are being deployed 
         overseas or are returning from an overseas deployment.

Whereas members of the Armed Forces carry their personal and military equipment 
        on aircraft when being deployed overseas or returning from an overseas 
        deployment;
Whereas individual members of the Armed Forces have been charged as much as $200 
        for checked baggage when returning from an overseas deployment;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces should not have to endure personal financial 
        hardship as a result of serving our country;
Whereas members of the Armed Forces make great sacrifices, including putting 
        their lives in danger, to defend our country; and
Whereas members of the Armed Forces traveling on official military orders should 
        be provided with all reasonable and available accommodations when on 
        commercial aircraft: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that each United States commercial air 
carrier should provide to any member of the Armed Forces who is 
traveling on official military orders and is being deployed overseas or 
is returning from an overseas deployment--
            (1) priority with respect to aircraft boarding;
            (2) priority with respect to seat upgrades, when available; 
        and
            (3) a waiver of all baggage fees.
                                 <all>
```