alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

AFS-11-017-P April 15, 2011

Mr. Randy Hansen

Government Relations Director Experimental Aircraft Association

P.O. Box 3086 Oshkosh, WI 54903-3086

Dear Mr. Hansen:

In your October 13, 2010 letter, you petiti oned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to amend § 91.151 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

When the FAA responds to petitions for ru lemaking, it must follow the requirements of 14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelin es for processing petitions for rulemaking found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) the immediacy of the safety or secu rity concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of ot her FAA issues; and 3) the resources we have available to address these issues.

The FAA has very limited resources for rule making. These resources are dedicated to enhancing safety for the National Airspace System to get the best results from our limited resources. Your request is neither intende d to address a safety concern nor would it affect a large user group. It would apply onl y to the aerobatic group of the Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), the Internationa l Aerobatic Club (IAC), and that would only be for IAC-sanctioned competitive meets. Al so, this proposed rule change would have no operational impact, since the EAA already has an exemption that permits the IAC to exercise the privileges of the proposed cha nge. It would only relieve the EAA from the requirement to renew the exemption every 2 years.2 The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are crucial to the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA regards your request for a rule change as a convenience rath er than a safety issue. The FAA has been very responsive to the EAA in issuing an exem ption that allows the EAA to operate in the manner requested. The only difference the pr oposed rulemaking would make is to allow the IAC, the aerobatic competition branch of the EAA, to continue to exercise these same privileges without the inconvenience of getti ng an extension to the current exemption every 2 years.

The FAA must prioritize its limited rulemaking re sources so as to deliver the most safety value to the aviation system as a whole. Therefore, this request is denied.

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2007-27080 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of American Antiquities, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Kevin T. Quinlan
                                 ----------------------
                                 Kevin T. Quinlan
                                 Chief Financial Officer

June 25, 2009
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER WHEELER

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2307

[ July 19, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Rothschild , Judge; L.T. Case No.

17004388CT10A

.

Dameka L. Davis, Hollywood , for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, G ROSS and T AYLOR

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
254P16

#### Dawn Weideman v. Erin Atalie Shelton v. Annette Wise, Intervenor

Intervenor’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-772)

Denied
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |         |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | -2,581 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -9,651  | 4,687  | 2,488  | -5,699 | 8,780  | -3,283 | 6,504  | -89    | 10,559 | -13,807
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 13,271  | 169    | -4,501 | -6,972 | -2,211 | -6,549 | 3,770  | 348    | 3,522  | 2,154  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -14,644 | 9,740  | 707    | -4,213 | -834   | -3,405 | -4,958 | 14     | -302   | 5,797  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -4,282  | 6,424  | 1,491  | -309   | 559    | 8,251  | 7,793  | -256   | 9,248  | 3,715  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,718   | 156    | -3,715 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
#### Jercore R. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee,

Case No. 2D16-5542

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit’ Court for Pi-nellas County; Anthony Rondolino, Judge.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 33.4
 ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING
CRITERIA
   Platform:
 Applicable Servicing Criteria:
 Period:
  
 
 
 1




---



##### 



The Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New YorkThe Bank of New York Trust
    
    The Bank of New York TrustCompany, N.A.
    
    Company, N.A.The Bank of New York (Delaware)
 /s/ Robert L. Griffin
    
    
    
    /s/ Patrick J. TadieRobert L. Griffin
    
    
    
    Patrick J. TadieAuthorized Signer
    
    
    
    Authorized Signer
  2
#### Abraham Jackson MPAKA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Daniel JUNIOR, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0412

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 08-45356, 08-47375

Dismissed.
MS STRUCTURED TILES SERIES 2006-1 10-K

Exhibit 35.1











Global
                                 Corporate Trust 
190 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor 
MK-IL-SL7C 
Chicago, IL 60603

usbank.com







Annual Statement of Compliance

TILES Trust No. 2006-1



VIA: EMAIL



MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036



Reference is made to the Trust
Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,
as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee, for TILES Trust No. 2006-1, dated February 15, 2006, together with Schedules I, II and III attached thereto, and the Standard
Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, as successor-in-interest
to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee dated March
5, 2003. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings defined in the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms
for Trust Agreements.



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of
U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:



1.       A review of
the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made
under my supervision; and



2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have
the meanings set forth in the Agreement.







Date: March 2, 2023



U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest
to Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee.



By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7453

ERIC D. SAUNDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-1644)

Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric D. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric D. Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). Although this was a successive petition, the

district court denied relief on the merits. Because Saunders did

not obtain authorization from this court to file the petition in

the district court, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp.

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Ohio Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Ohio Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,656  | 3,505  | 2,879 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 3,140  | 4,302  | 3,397  | 3,548  | 2,957  | 2,925  | 2,742  | 2,814  | 3,477  | 22,094
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,941  | 1,776  | 3,671  | 4,377  | 5,741  | 5,442  | 5,243  | 5,802  | 4,869  | 3,876 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 5,129  | 1,476  | 1,450  | 1,366  | 1,332  | 1,283  | 1,230  | 1,201  | 1,125  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### SEAVAULT PARTNERS, LLC and Homero Meruelo, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. BERMELLO, AJAMIL, & PARTNERS, INC. and Brisas Del Rio, Inc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1154

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 22, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-27242

Dismissed.

Denied.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------






                                 CERTIFICATION


         I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
         on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
         report, of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-83CB;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
         a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
         the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
         agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
         review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
         reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
         agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
         based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
         after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
         Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
         forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
         included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
         information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
         Bank of New York, as Trustee.


         Date: March 27, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
#### Daniel MATERDOMINI, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SHELBORNE OCEAN BEACH HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0516, 3D17-0477, 3D17-0478, 3D17-0479, 3D17-0480, 3D17-0481, 3D17-0482, 3D17-0483, 3D17-0484, 3D17-0485, 3D17-0486, 3D17-0487, 3D17-0488, 3D17-0489, 3D17-0490, 3D17-0491, 3D17-0492, 3D17-0493, 3D17-0494, 3D17-0495, 3D17-0496

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

JUNE 02, 2017

L.T. NO.: 12-15281,14-20989,14-16340, 14-16570, 13-29185, 14-22835, 14-2711, 13-35478, 12-27155, 14-20986, 14-2932, 14-3394, 14-3397, 13-31597, 13-29196, 14-*36625012, 14-20985, 13-30561, 13-37463, 14-1946, 14-24507, 14-25160, 14-24554, 14-19528

Dismissed.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0340**
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019299EN.01001401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/14 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9496 — Ardian France/Staci)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 299/08)

1.

On 27 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019299EN.01001401-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ardian France SA (‘Ardian’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Staci Group (‘Staci’, France), controlled by Compagnie Benelux Participations SA (‘Cobepa’, Belgique). |

Ardian acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Staci.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Ardian: an independent private investment company which manages and/or advises on assets in Europe, North America and Asia. Ardian does not hold any shares in portfolio companies that are active in the logistics services sector,

—   for Staci: active in the logistics sector, a specialist in retail logistics, and more specifically in the field of (i) logistics for marketing products and (ii) retail logistics for commercial products. Staci provides logistics services in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019299EN.01001401-E0002), it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9496 — Ardian France/Staci

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019299EN.01001401-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019299EN.01001401-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
063A17

#### State v. Antwarn Lee Rogers

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 02/23/2017

2. Allowed 03/15/2017
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Oregon Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Oregon Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 18    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 19     | 16     | 16     | 18     | 19     | 17     | 18     | 17     | 15     | 19    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 20     | 18     | 15     | 15     | 15     | 14     | 18     | 21     | 24    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 26     | 28     | 24     | 24     | 12     | 13     | 16     | 14     | 14     | 13    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024