alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1034 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1034

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the funding and 
      expenditure authority of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2011

   Mr. Camp introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on 
  Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the funding and 
      expenditure authority of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airport and Airway Trust Fund 
Financing Reauthorization Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND EXPENDITURE 
              AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 9502(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``April 1, 2011'' and inserting ``October 
        1, 2014'', and
            (2) by inserting ``or the FAA Reauthorization and Reform 
        Act of 2011'' before the semicolon at the end of subparagraph 
        (A).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 9502(e) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``April 1, 2011'' and inserting ``October 
1, 2014''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF TAXES FUNDING AIRPORT AND AIRWAY TRUST FUND.

    (a) Fuel Taxes.--Subparagraph (B) of section 4081(d)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``March 31, 2011'' 
and inserting ``September 30, 2014''.
    (b) Ticket Taxes.--
            (1) Persons.--Clause (ii) of section 4261(j)(1)(A) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``March 31, 2011'' and inserting 
        ``September 30, 2014''.
            (2) Property.--Clause (ii) of section 4271(d)(1)(A) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``March 31, 2011'' and inserting 
        ``September 30, 2014''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019245EN.01000501.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/5

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9142 — REWE/Lekkerland)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 245/05)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | REWE-ZENTRALFINANZ eG (Germany, ‘REWE’) and REWE-Zentral Aktiengesellschaft (Germany) (together ‘REWE Group’), |
| --- | --- |

—

REWE-ZENTRALFINANZ eG (Germany, ‘REWE’) and REWE-Zentral Aktiengesellschaft (Germany) (together ‘REWE Group’),

| — | Lekkerland AG & Co. KG (Germany) and Lekkerland AG (Germany) (together ‘Lekkerland’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Lekkerland AG & Co. KG (Germany) and Lekkerland AG (Germany) (together ‘Lekkerland’).

REWE acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the whole of Lekkerland.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | REWE is mainly active in the retail distribution of daily consumer goods. It operates supermarkets, beverage stores, discounters, DIY stores and drugstores under different brands, |
| --- | --- |

—

REWE is mainly active in the retail distribution of daily consumer goods. It operates supermarkets, beverage stores, discounters, DIY stores and drugstores under different brands,

| — | Lekkerland is mainly active in the wholesale distribution of daily consumer goods like food-to-go and non-food products, including tobacco, as well as in the supply of e-loading solutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lekkerland is mainly active in the wholesale distribution of daily consumer goods like food-to-go and non-food products, including tobacco, as well as in the supply of e-loading solutions.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9142 — REWE/Lekkerland

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
#### D.T., Father of D.T., A.T., T.T. and T.T., Children, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1924

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 18, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Her-nando County, Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### Tommy GOMATOS and Constantina Gomatos, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SHELBORNE OCEAN BEACH HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0771

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 31, 2017

L.T. NO.: 14-22835

Dismissed.
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Maryland Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Maryland Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |         |        |        |        | 15,524 | 21,515 | 22,842
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 28,926 | 17,520 | 22,273 | 10,995  | 12,045 | 20,478 | 21,830 | 23,079 | 19,910 | 18,039
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30,728 | 21,136 | 49,211 | 24,556  | 20,403 | 39,770 | 49,486 | 50,725 | 97,671 | 96,274
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 95,487 | 98,646 | 99,108 | 110,336 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# C_2019376EN.01004601.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/46

---

Innovation and Networks Executive Agency

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/46)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/sites/inea/files/2018_inea_final_annual_accounts.pdf

---
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Penitas, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Penitas, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1.72   |        | 2.04   |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
1 **UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA** 

RHONDA FLEMING, Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 15-1135 (EGS)
MEDICARE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION GROUP, et al. , Defendants.

**ORDER** On October 13, 2015, the Court referred this case for full case management to a randomly assigned magistrate judge. See Min. Order (10/13/2015). Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on April 4, 2019. See R&R, ECF No. 184. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and, having received no objections to the R&R pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.3(b), accepts the findings and adopts the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Harvey contained in the R&R. Accordingly, it is hereby **ORDERED** that defendants’ renewed motion for summary judgment is **DENIED** ; and it is further **ORDERED** that plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment is **DENIED** ; and it is further2

**ORDERED** that defendants shall file by no later than July 2 9 , 2019 a renewed motion for summary judgment addressing the two deficiencies identified in the R&R, which are: Defendants’ failure to show: (1) that the Department of Justice lacks custody or control over Assistant United States Attorney Albert Balboni’s personnel records that are held at the National Personnel Records Center: and (2) that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services properly invoked Exemption 6 over the information redacted from the records it recently produced to plaintiff. **SO ORDERED. Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan**  **United States District Judge June 13, 2019**
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 06 88 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 2 21 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
210P16

#### State v. Dale Patrick Martin

1. Defs *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-830)

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

1. Denied

2. Allowed
# C_2019037EN.01001601.xml

| 30.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/16

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9269 — ENGIE/BPCE/ENGIE PV Curbans)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 37/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Engie S.A. (‘Engie’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Engie S.A. (‘Engie’, France),

| — | Mirova Eurofideme 4 (France), belonging to the Banque Populaire Caisse d’Epargne Group (‘BPCE’, France), |
| --- | --- |

—

Mirova Eurofideme 4 (France), belonging to the Banque Populaire Caisse d’Epargne Group (‘BPCE’, France),

| — | ENGIE PV Curbans (‘The Target’, France). |
| --- | --- |

—

ENGIE PV Curbans (‘The Target’, France).

Engie and BPCE acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Target.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Engie is an industrial company active in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services. It is active throughout the entire energy-value chain. |
| --- | --- |

—

Engie is an industrial company active in the fields of gas, electricity and energy services. It is active throughout the entire energy-value chain.

| — | BPCE is a French financial institution mainly active in financial services and banking. |
| --- | --- |

—

BPCE is a French financial institution mainly active in financial services and banking.

| — | The Target holds a photovoltaic plant and is active in the generation and wholesale of electricity in France. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Target holds a photovoltaic plant and is active in the generation and wholesale of electricity in France.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9269 — ENGIE/BPCE/ENGIE PV Curbans

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0671 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-096-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Connecticut Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Connecticut Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 137,224
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 131,255 | 138,751 | 218,371 | 188,443 | 214,098 | 259,486 | 254,633 | 259,700 | 227,644 | 222,593
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 209,454 | 217,394 | 223,550 | 231,981 | 222,899 | 254,740 | 273,034 | 302,201 | 270,796 | 275,876
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 351,833 | 376,688 | 387,750 | 309,667 | 311,169 | 316,434 | 275,484 | 322,717 | 343,260 | 336,961
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 333,087 | 360,797 | 345,045 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### In re Marriage of Einsel

110,559

08/20/2015

Denied.

Unpublished