alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(1 ri J

# r IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0411 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. RYAN SCOTT BROADBROOKS,

Defendant and Appellant. 

### FILL 1) P,UG 25 2020
Bowen Greenwood Clerk. of Supreme Court State of iviontana 

### 0R D E R

Ryan Scott Broadbrooks petitions this Court for an out-of-time appeal. As grounds, he states thathe discussed filing a timely appeal with his attorney but that his attorney failed to file the appeal. Broadbrooks further states that he "did not file a timely appeal because [his] OPD [counsel]'' had told him that he could not appeal because he took a plea agreement. He adds thathe "wasalso coerced into a plea agreementby [his]sentencing judge . . . ." He asserts that he does not have a copy ofhis final judgment. Contrary to his assertion,Broadbrooks includes a copy ofa June 25,2020 Order of Revocation and I»>position of Sentence, issued in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County,sentencing him upon revocation to the Department ofCorrections fora three-year term for felony criminal possession ofdangerous drugs. M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage ofjustice[1" Although Broadbrooks has filed an unverified petition, he filed his petition in the statutory time period ofsixty days or by August 24,2020. Broadbr000ks indicates thathe is presently without counsel. We conclude that Broadbrooks may be entitled to pursue this appeal and to qualify for the appointment of counsel to represent him on appeal. Section 46-8-104,MCA. Accordingly, 08/25/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0411IT IS ORDERED that Broadbrooks's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal is

GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellate Defender Division is APPOINTED to represent Ryan Scott Broadbrooks. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date ofthis Order within which either to file a Notice ofAppeal or a Motion to Rescind this Order Appointing Counsel. In the event Broadbrooks qualifies for appointed counsel,the Appellate Defender Division shall immediately orderthe appropriate transcripts, ifthey have not been already ordered. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to the Appellate Defender Division, to counsel of record, and to Ryan Scott Broadbrooks personally. DATED this 7-)- day ofAugust,2020.

ChiefJustice



# 4 •

Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 106

      To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased 
         imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

 Mr. Cardoza introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide increased 
         imprisonment for certain offenses by public officials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Public Official Accountability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter D of chapter 227 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses by public 
              officials
    ``(a) General Rule.--In any Federal criminal case in which a public 
official is convicted of an offense against the United States--
            ``(1) consisting of conduct during the course of official 
        duty, intended to enrich that official; and
            ``(2) involving bribery, fraud, extortion, or theft of 
        public funds greater than $10,000;
the sentencing judge may increase the sentence of imprisonment by an 
amount of up to 2 years. The sentencing judge may double the sentence 
of imprisonment that would otherwise be imposed in that case: Provided, 
however, That in no instance may the sentencing judge be allowed to 
increase the sentence by more than 2 years.
    ``(b) Definition.--In this section, the term `public official' 
means--
            ``(1) an elected official of the United States or of a 
        State or local government;
            ``(2) a presidentially appointed official; and
            ``(3) an official appointed to a State or local 
        governmental office by an elected official of a State or local 
        government.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
subchapter D of chapter 227 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 
by adding at the end the following new item:

``3587. Increased imprisonment for certain offenses by public 
                            officials.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 59 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 59

 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
relating to ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 
 for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2011

    Mr. Carter introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
relating to ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 
 for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area 
Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers'' (published 
at 76 Federal Register 15554 (March 21, 2011)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determin ed that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-50080

_____________________
IN THE MATTER OF: INTELOGIC TRACE, INC.,

Debtor.

TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS and TEXAS EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION,

Appellants,

versus

INTELOGIC TRACE, INC.,

Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(CA-SA-94-893)

_________________________________________________________________
June 4, 1996
Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The appellants concede that their challenge to the bankruptcy

court order authorizing the debtor to pay, prior to plan

confirmation, employee claims exceeding the limits for priority

wage and benefit claims under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(3) and (4), is

moot. They assert, however, that we have jurisdiction to review

the order under the "capable of rep etition, yet evading review"

exception to the mootness doctrine, because payment of the claims- 2 -

at issue had been completed before an appeal of the order could be

litigated, and there is a reasonable expectation that the

appellants will be subjected to the same action again. S ee, e.g.,

Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. ICC , 219 U.S. 498 (1911).

We do not reach whether this exception applie s. The

appellants' proof of claim was disallowed as untimely, and they did

not appeal the disallowance. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED

.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Nebraska Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Nebraska Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 35     | 63     | 17     | 1      | 1      | 0      | 0      | 25     | 84    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 14     | 9      | 18     | 15     | 315    | 134    | 11     | 4     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 339    | 6      | 1      | 13     | 39     | 16     | 19     | 33     | 28     | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 9      | 4      | 2      | 376    | 23     | 8      | 700    | 561    | 111   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 327    | 59     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. SOTO, L.

61 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/01/2017

CP-51-CR-0007170-2013 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 135 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR PRESENTATION OF CON4 GRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO DAW AUNG 

5 SAN SUU KYI. 

6 The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 
2 

•HCON 135 EH 

1 on September 19, 2012, for the presentation of the Con2 gressional Gold Medal to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, in rec3 ognition of her leadership and perseverance in the struggle 

4 for freedom and democracy in Burma. Physical prepara5 tions for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance 

6 with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 

7 prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives August 1, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 135 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol 

gle for freedom and democracy in Burma. of her leadership and perseverance in the strugMedal to Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, in recognition for the presentation of the Congressional Gold
#### COM. v. UGARTE, D.

51 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

CP-35-CR-0002238-2004

(Lackawanna)

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,142 and TA-W-34,142A]


Red Kap Industries, Ripley, MS and Tompkinsville, KY; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 6, 1998, applicable 
to all workers of Red Kap Industries located in Ripley, Mississippi. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 16, 1998 (63 
FR 12831).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations will occur at the subject firm's Tompkinsville, 
Kentucky plant. The workers are engaged in employment related to the 
production of work uniforms and jeans.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Red Kap Industries who were affected by increased imports. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the worker certification to 
include the workers of Red Kap Industries in Tompkinsville, Kentucky.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,142 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Red Kap Industries, Ripley, Mississippi (TA-W-
34,142) and Tompkinsville, Kentucky (TA-W-34,142A) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 
18, 1996 through February 6, 2000, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 16th day of April, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-11905 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**CERTIFICATE
      OF OFFICER**


**OF**


**LNR
      PARTNERS, INC.**





**Pooling
      and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2005**


**(the
      “Agreement”), by and among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,
      as**


**Depositor,
      GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Master Servicer,**


**Wells
      Fargo Bank N.A., as Trustee,**


**LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator,**


**and
      LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer**


**(MLMT
      2005-LC1)**








The
      undersigned, Susan K. Chapman, as Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc., a
      Florida Corporation (the “Company”), in accordance with Section 3.13 of the
      Agreement, hereby certifies on behalf of the Company that (i) a review of the
      activities of the Company during the preceding calendar year of its performance
      under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best of
      my
      knowledge, based on such review, the Company has performed and fulfilled all
      of
      its material obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
      such period ended December 31, 2005, and there has been no material
      default of such obligation, (iii) the Company has received no notice
      regarding qualification, or challenging the status of REMIC I or REMIC II as
      a
      REMIC under the REMIC Provisions or of Grantor Trust A-3FL,  Grantor
      Trust A-4FC or Grantor Trust Z as a "grantor trust" for income tax purposes
      under the Grantor Trust Provisions form the Internal Revenue Service or any
      other governmental agency or body.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Certificate
      as
      of the 1 st day of
      March, 2006.














/s/ Susan K. Chapman


Susan
      K.
      Chapman


Vice
      President


LNR
      Partners, Inc.
# C_2019247EN.01003301.xml

| 23.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/33

---

Information about pre-closure of multiple complaint CHAP(2013)02466

(2019/C 247/12)

In 2013, 2014 and 2015 the European Commission received a large number of complaints about the checks made by the Spanish authorities at the border with Gibraltar on persons and goods, which were excessive and caused long delays.

The European Commission has registered these complaints under the reference CHAP(2013)02466. The acknowledgment of receipt was initially published in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 246 of 27 August 2013. The latest information on the follow-up of this complaint can be found in the
  Official Journal of the European Union C 223 of 27 June 2018.

Following examination of the complaints as well as exchanges with the relevant authorities from both sides, the Commission decided to organise three technical visits to the crossing point of La Línea de la Concepción at the border between Spain and Gibraltar, respectively on 25 September 2013, 2 July 2014 and 27 October 2015. Each visit was followed by recommendations from the Commission to both Spain and the United Kingdom to improve the situation at the border, in particular by optimising the physical infrastructure, optimising the risk-based profiling in order to better target checks, introducing additional measures to tackle the smuggling of cigarettes from Gibraltar and developing the exchange of information and cooperation. Funding to help implement the recommended measures was also provided under the External Borders Fund/Internal Security Fund.

The Commission has continued to monitor the situation at the border crossing point of La Línea de la Concepción since then. It concluded that both Spain and the United Kingdom have implemented all the recommendations addressed to them. In addition, no further complaints on excessive delays at the border with Gibraltar and Spain have been received since then, which would indicate that the situation has stabilised.

Therefore, on the basis of the observations during the technical visits and the information provided by both authorities following the recommendations made by the Commission after each visit, the Commission has not found evidence to conclude that the checks on persons and goods as operated by the Spanish authorities at the crossing point of La Línea de la Concepción have infringed the relevant provisions of Union law.

In view of the above, the Commission’s services have concluded that this case could be closed.

However, if any of the complainants in this case have any new information that might demonstrate the existence of an infringement of European Union law, they are invited to send this new information to the European Commission within four weeks from the publication of this notice. After this period has passed, the Commission intends to close the case.

---
#### WOJCIECHOWSKI, A. v. WOJCIECHOWSKI, P.

38 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

8533, May term, 2000 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           | 925       | 942,571   | 955,810   | 970,512  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 983,592   | 1,002,154 | 1,022,542 | 1,044,699 | 1,073,308 | 1,108,899 | 1,147,743 | 1,183,978 | 1,223,433 | 1,265,032
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,315,619 | 1,365,413 | 1,412,923 | 1,453,974 | 1,496,876 | 1,524,813 | 1,558,911 | 1,583,945 | 1,606,602 | 1,622,434
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,634,587 | 1,645,716 | 1,659,808 | 1,672,312 | 1,690,581 | 1,712,153 | 1,735,970 | 1,759,427 | 1,784,751 | 1,813,004
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,840,038 | 1,867,050 | 1,891,533 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024