alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David W. ROBERTS and Royal Palm Properties, LLC, Appellants, v. Rick S. FELBERBAUM, Individually, and Felberbaum & Associates, P.A., a Florida Professional association, Christie’s Great Estates, Inc., n/k/a Christies International Real Estate, Inc., a Florida corporation, Premier Estate Properties, Inc., Gerard P. Liguori, Carmen N. D’angelo and Joseph G. Liguori, Appellees.

No. 4D16-1694

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Meenu Sasser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2009CA040545XXXXMB.

Affirmed.
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed December 10, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00154-CR

____________

SHERWIN SIMPLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 85187-CR

ABATEMENT ORDER

The State has filed a motion to abate this appeal and remand for the trial 

court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of 

appellant’s statement. The record reflects the trial court did not make findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of appellant’s statement. Article 

38.22, section 6 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure requires the trial court to 

make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether a challenged 
statement was made voluntarily, even if appellant did not request findings and 

conclusions or object to their absence. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.22 § 6; Urias 

v. State, 155 S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). The statute is mandatory 

and the proper procedure to correct the error is to abate the appeal and direct the 

trial court to make the required findings and conclusions. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; 

Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987). 

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and direct the trial court to reduce 

to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the voluntariness of 

appellant’s statement and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those 

findings filed with the clerk of this court within thirty days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are filed in this court. The court 

also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either 

party. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Poissant.
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Arkansas (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Arkansas (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 241,664 | 247,908 | 241,648
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 240,672 | 217,765 | 233,046 | 237,428 | 205,480 | 202,946 | 221,378 | 214,298 | 221,983 | 230,488
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 256,102 | 266,194 | 278,304 | 263,281 | 249,425 | 275,572 | 296,175 | 300,548 | 349,836 | 353,699
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 320,234 | 345,368 | 379,448 | 366,459 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Thomas TATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-3266

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 14, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James 0. Shelter, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|West Virginia Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|West Virginia Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 38    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 39     | 39     | 39     | 37     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36     | 36    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 36     | 36     | 33     | 31     | 31     | 31     | 31     | 32     | 32     | 32    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 32     | 30     | 30     | 30     | 30     | 31     | 31     | 31     | 31     | 31    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 31     | 31     | 31     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1111 

To rescind $45 billion of unobligated discretionary appropriations, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2011 

Mr. PRICE of Georgia (for himself, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. COBLE, Mrs. ELLMERS, 

Mr. FLORES, Ms. FOXX, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. GUINTA, Mr. 

SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. LONG, Mrs. MCMORRIS

RODGERS, Mr. POMPEO, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. THOMPSON of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. WESTMORELAND, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind $45 billion of unobligated discretionary 

appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decrease Spending 

5 Now Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1111 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED DISCRETIONARY AP2 PROPRIATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Of the unobligated balances of 

4 discretionary appropriations on the date of enactment of 

5 this Act, $45,000,000,000 is rescinded. 

6 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Office of 

8 Management and Budget shall determine which ap9 propriation accounts the rescission under subsection 

10 (a) shall apply to and the amount that each such ac11 count shall be reduced by pursuant to such rescis12 sion. 

13 (2) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the 

14 date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of 

15 the Office of Management and Budget shall submit 

16 a report to the Secretary of the Treasury and Con17 gress listing the accounts reduced by the rescission 

18 in subsection (a) and the amounts rescinded from 

19 each such account. 

20 (c) EXCEPTIONS.—The rescission under subsection 

21 (a) shall not apply to the Department of Defense, the De22 partment of Veterans Affairs, or the Social Security Ad23 ministration. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-351-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

April 24, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 14, 1998, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NorAm), 1111 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-351-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 
157.208(b)) for authorization to construct, install, and operate a 1-
inch tap and first-cut regulator on Line LT-1, in Lafayette County, 
Arkansas to provide service to rural customers served by Arkla, a 
division of NorAm Energy Corp., under the blanket certificate issued 
and amended in Docket Nos. CP82-384-000 and Cp82-384-001, all as more 
fully set forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    NorAm states that the estimated peak day and annual deliveries are 
196 MMBtu and 1,360 MMBtu respectively. NorAm states that the proposed 
delivered volumes are within Arkla's certificated entitlement and that 
it has sufficient capacity to accomplish the deliveries without 
detriment or disadvantage to its other customers. NorAm estimates that 
the cost of the construction will be $2,414, or which Arkla will 
reimburse NorAm $1,833 of this cost.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11456 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Missouri Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1      | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 1      | 1      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
From: <French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <James.Messer@exide.com>

CC: Donna Lazzari <Donna.Lazzari@erg.com>, <michael.burr@erg.com>

Date: 1/5/2011 6:22 PM

Subject: Test Data for Exide Frsico

Dear Mr. Messer,

 As I mentioned in voice-mail today, we have not yet received

the emissions test results for the Exide Frisco Secondary Lead Smelting

facility. The deadline has long passed. We really need that data

immediately. Could you please send the test results and data as soon as

possible this week, and no later than COB on January 7, 2011.

Let me know if you have questions.

Thank You.

Chuck French, EPA
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 27 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.27
                                        Agreed to March 16, 2011        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF STATUE OF GERALD R. FORD FROM THE PEOPLE OF 
              MICHIGAN FOR PLACEMENT IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL.

    (a) In General.--The statue of Gerald R. Ford furnished by the 
people of Michigan for placement in the United States Capitol in 
accordance with section 1814 of the Revised Statutes of the United 
States (2 U.S.C. 2131), is accepted in the name of the United States, 
and the thanks of the Congress are tendered to the people of Michigan 
for providing this commemoration of one of Michigan's most eminent 
persons.
    (b) Presentation Ceremony.--The State of Michigan is authorized to 
use the Rotunda of the Capitol on May 3, 2011, for a presentation 
ceremony for the statue accepted under this section. The Architect of 
the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may 
be necessary with respect to physical preparations and security for the 
ceremony.
    (c) Display in Rotunda.--The Architect of the Capitol shall provide 
for the display of the statue accepted under this section in the 
Rotunda of the Capitol, in accordance with the procedures described in 
section 311(e) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 
U.S.C. 2132(e)).
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Nebraska Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Nebraska Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 95     | -54    | -286   | 162    | -70    | -136   | -48    | 14     | 132    | -204  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 339    | -119   | 111    | 65     | 26     | -134   | 127    | 122    | -351   | 176   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -132   | 348    | -31    | -83    | -8     | 121    | -122   | 18     | -15    | -10   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 39     | -73    | -140   | 280    | -202   | 234    | -105   | -93    | 128    | -41   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 45     | 0      | 65     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2045

MICHAEL KNIGHTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity); STIHL 

INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and 

Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES, (Third Party Beneficially 

Capacity and Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party 

Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00260-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted: January 10, 2014 Decided: March 7, 2014

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Knights, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Gayle Augustin, 

Thomas Joseph Flaherty, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia; 

Sarah Kate McConaughy, Robert W. McFarland, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, 

Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Knights appeals the district court’s order 

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil 

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00260-

RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2013). We grant Knights leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED