alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Lewis GIBSON Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1291

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 18, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. James Colaw, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.46a


October 14, 2002



Mr. Burton S. August
AA&L Associates, L.P.
c/o Monro Muffler / Brake
200 Holleder Parkway
Rochester, NY  14615


RE:      Agreement between AA&L Associates, L.P. (Landlord) and Monro Muffler /
         Brake, Inc. (Tenant) for premises situate at 5598 Camp Road, Hamburg,
         NY [MMB #53]

Dear Burt:

Please accept this letter as Monro Muffler / Brake, Inc.'s official notification
of our intent to renew said lease agreement for the first five-year renewal
period commencing on May 1, 2003 and expiring April 30, 2008. The rent for said
renewal period shall be $2,400.00 per month.

Tenant shall have one five-year renewal option remaining.

Yours truly,



/s/ Thomas M. Aspenleiter
------------------------------------
Thomas M. Aspenleiter
VP Real Estate

TMA:mc
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11569]



[[Page 23736]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Global Markets Advisory Committee Meeting

    This is to give notice, pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Sec. 10(a), that the Commodity 
Futures Trading Commission's Global Markets Advisory Committee will 
conduct a public meeting on May 14, 1998 in the first floor hearing 
room (Room 1000) of the Commission's Washington, D.C. headquarters, 
Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20581. 
The meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. and last until 5:00 p.m. The agenda 
will consist of the following:

Agenda

A. Part 1
    1. Introductory Remarks by Commissioner Barbara Pedersen Holum, 
Chairman, Global Markets Advisory Committee
    2. Report on CFTC Activities of International Interest by 
Chairperson Brooksley Born
    3. Discussion of Business Problems Encountered during Asian 
Market Volatility
    4. General Discussion of the Impediments to Conducting Business 
Abroad
B. Part 2
    5. Discussion Regarding Placement of U.S. Exchanges' Terminals 
in Foreign Countries and Foreign Exchanges' Terminals in the U.S.
    6. Other Topics of Concern to Advisory Committee Members

    The Advisory Committee was created by the Commodity Futures 
Trading Commission for the purpose of receiving advice and 
recommendations on the myriad of complex and novel issues raised by 
the ever-increasing globalization of futures markets. The purposes 
and objectives of the Global Markets Advisory Committee are more 
fully set forth in the Charter of the Advisory Committee.
    The meeting is open to the public. The Chairman of the Advisory 
Committee, Commissioner Barbara Pedersen Holum, is empowered to 
conduct the meeting in a fashion that will, in her judgment, 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any member of the public 
who wishes to file a written statement with the Advisory Committee 
should mail a copy of the statement to the attention of: The Global 
Markets Advisory Commission, Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st 
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20581, before the meeting. Members of 
the public who wish to make oral statements should also inform 
Commissioner Holum in writing at the foregoing address at least 
three business days before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be 
made, if time permits, for an oral presentation of no more than five 
minutes each in duration.

    Issued by the Commission in Washington, D.C. on April 27, 1998.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 98-11569 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1192 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1192

            To extend the current royalty rate for soda ash.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2011

  Mrs. Lummis (for herself and Mr. Wu) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the current royalty rate for soda ash.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Soda Ash Royalty Extension, Job 
Creation, and Export Enhancement Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH.

    Section 102 of Public Law 109-338 (30 U.S.C. 262 note) is amended 
by striking ``5-year'' and inserting ``10-year''.
                                 <all>
```
#### COM. v. COLEMAN, G.

69 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/01/2017

CP-41-CR-0001183-2015

(Lycoming)

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11564]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Approval

    The following applicant has applied for approval to conduct certain 
activities with birds that are protected in accordance with the Wild 
Bird Conservation Act of 1992. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 112(4) of the Wild Bird Conservation Act of 1992, 50 CFR 
15.26(c).
    Applicant: David H. Dixon, Bluffdale, Utah. The applicant wishes to 
establish a cooperative breeding program for the European goshawk 
(Accipiter gentilis), the European sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), the 
English peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus peregrinus), the Cassini 
peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus cassini), the Saker falcon (Falco 
cherrug), the Black shaheen (Falco peregrinus peregrinator), the Red-
headed merlin (Falco chicquera) and the Black sparrowhawk (Accipiter 
melanoleucus). Mr. Dixon wishes to be an active participant in this 
program with five other private individuals. The Utah Falconers and 
Raptor Breeders Association has assumed the responsibility for the 
oversight of the program.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 700, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
700, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2095); FAX: (703/358-
2298).

    Dated: April 27, 1998.
Margaret Tieger,
Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 98-11564 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.43   | 1.26   | 1.31   | 1.46   | 1.40   | 1.46   | 1.30  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.36   | 1.34   | 1.28   | 1.18   | 1.19   | 1.31   | 1.25   | 1.36   | 1.29   | 1.33  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.35   | 1.28   | 1.25   | 1.34   | 1.36   | 1.31   | 1.19   | 1.20   | 1.34   | 1.39  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.34   | 1.33   | 1.29   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**


**Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2006-PC1**




VIA:
      EMAIL





Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC


383
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10179


regabnotifications@bear.com





EMC
      Mortgage Corporation


2780
      Lake
      Vista Drive


Lewisville,
      Texas 75067





Re:  The
      Pooling and Servicing agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor and Purchaser,
      EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Sponsor and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
      National Association, as Trustee.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.







Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee





/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|West Virginia Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|West Virginia Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 100.0 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.9   | 99.9   | 100.0  | 1.0    | 100.0 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 100.0  | 100.0  | 100.0  | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Harold C. GRAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-4226

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.' R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pi-nellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-152
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
No. 12-236.

#### Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services *v.*Cloer.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DAVID MARTIN BEASLEY YOUNG STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DOMINIQUE JEVON PERRY STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SETHY TONY SEAM

From Buncombe County

From Guilford County

From Davidson County

No. 80A14

No. 81A14

No. 82A14

ORDER

The Court, on its own motion, ordered that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the effect of *Montgomery v. Louisiana,*136 S. Ct. 718 (2016), on the proceedings in these cases.

The Court, on its own motion, now orders that these three cases are consolidated for oral argument. Pursuant to Rule 30(b), appellants will have a total of thirty minutes for oral argument and appellees will have a total of thirty minutes for oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 18th day of August 2016.

s/Martin. C.J.

For the Court

*30WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 18th day of August 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk, Supreme Court of North Carolina

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk

Justice Ervin is recused in No. 82A14, State v. Sethy Tony Seam.
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 92 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall strike sub4 section (b) of section 310 of title 37, United States Code, 

5 as inserted by section 616(a)(2) of the bill, and insert the 

6 following: 
2 

•HCON 92 EH 

1 ‘‘(b) SPECIAL PAY AMOUNT.—(1) Except as provided 

2 in paragraph (2), the amount of special pay authorized 

3 by subsection (a) for qualifying service during a day or 

4 portion of a day shall be the amount equal to 1/30th of 

5 the maximum monthly amount of special pay payable to 

6 a member as specified in paragraph (3). 

7 ‘‘(2) In the case of a member who is exposed to hos8 tile fire or a hostile mine explosion event in or for a day 

9 or portion of a day, the Secretary concerned may, at the 

10 election of the Secretary, pay the member special pay 

11 under subsection (a) for such service in an amount not 

12 to exceed the maximum monthly amount of special pay 

13 payable to a member as specified in paragraph (3). 

14 ‘‘(3) The maximum monthly amount of special pay 

15 payable to a member under this subsection for any month 

16 is $225.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 92 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives 

to correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1192 

To extend the current royalty rate for soda ash. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mrs. LUMMIS (for herself and Mr. WU) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the current royalty rate for soda ash. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Soda Ash Royalty Ex5 tension, Job Creation, and Export Enhancement Act of 

6 2011’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

8 Section 102 of Public Law 109–338 (30 U.S.C. 262 

9 note) is amended by striking ‘‘5-year’’ and inserting ‘‘10- 

10 year’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 95 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 95

  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Labor should 
 recognize the unique circumstances of farm family youth workers when 
  issuing regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act relating to 
                hired farm workers under the age of 16.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

    Mr. Latham (for himself and Mr. Boren) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education 
                           and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Labor should 
 recognize the unique circumstances of farm family youth workers when 
  issuing regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act relating to 
                hired farm workers under the age of 16.

Whereas, on September 2, 2011, the Department of Labor published a Notice of 
        Proposed Rulemaking to update the agricultural child labor regulations;
Whereas family farms often depend on the contributions of youth for their 
        successful operation;
Whereas the proposed regulations will adversely impact the longstanding 
        tradition of youth working on farms to gain valuable skills and lessons 
        on hard work, character, and leadership;
Whereas the proposed regulations would be detrimental to the opportunity for 
        youth to gain experiential learning and hands-on skills for enrollment 
        in vocational agricultural training;
Whereas the proposed regulations would obstruct the opportunity for youth to 
        find rewarding employment and earn money for a college education or 
        other meaningful purposes;
Whereas the proposed regulations will limit opportunities to recruit young 
        farmers to agriculture at a time when the average age of farmers 
        continues to rise; and
Whereas working on a farm has become a way of life for thousands of youth across 
        rural America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Labor should 
recognize the unique circumstances of farm family youth workers and 
multi-generational family partnerships in agricultural operations when 
issuing regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act relating to 
hired farm workers under the age of 16.
                                 <all>
```