alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1159 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1159

 To repeal certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
 Care Act relating to the limitation on the Medicare exception to the 
    prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals and to 
transparency reports and reporting of physician ownership or investment 
                               interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2011

Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Olson, Mr. Barton of Texas, 
 Mr. Schweikert, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas, and 
 Mrs. Black) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable 
 Care Act relating to the limitation on the Medicare exception to the 
    prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals and to 
transparency reports and reporting of physician ownership or investment 
                               interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND 
              AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.

    Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), sections 6001 and 10601 
(relating to limitation on the Medicare exception to the prohibition on 
certain physician referrals for hospitals) and section 6002 (relating 
to transparency reports and reporting of physician ownership or 
investment interests) of such Act are repealed, and the provisions of 
law amended or repealed by such sections are restored or revived as if 
such Act had not been enacted.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-51; RM-9241]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Salmon, ID

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Alpine Broadcasting, Ltd., seeking the allotment of 
Channel 233A to Salmon, Idaho, as that community's second local FM 
transmission service. Coordinates used for this proposal are 45-10-30 
NL and 113-53-42 WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 1, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before June 16, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Theodore D. Kramer, 
Esq., Haley Bader & Potts P.L.C., Suite 900, 4350 North Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA 22203-1633.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-51, adopted April 1, 
1998, and released April 10, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-10521 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
052P17

#### Roy A. Cooper, III, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina v. Philip E. Berger, in His Official Capacity as President *Pro Tempore*of the North Carolina Senate; and Timothy K. Moore, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives

1. Pit’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COAP17-101)

2. Pit’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Pit’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1. Allowed 02/13/2017

2. Dismissed as moot

3. Dismissed as moot
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Rodney B. Harrison, as Vice President of Finance of Morton Industrial Group,Inc., certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MortonIndustrial Group, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Rodney B. Harrison
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Maryland Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Maryland Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 121    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 10.33



 EXHIBIT 10.33 

DIRECTOR FEE SUMMARY 
 Set forth below is a summary of the current director fee arrangements for non-employee directors serving on the Boards of Directors of Mercantile Bank Corporation (“Mercantile”) and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Mercantile Bank of Michigan (“Bank”). 
 For 2012, non-employee directors of the Bank are
paid an annual retainer of $12,000, and a fee of $750 for each meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank that they attend, other than meetings that focus on loans, for which non-employee directors are paid a fee of $700. In addition,
non-employee directors are paid a meeting fee of $700 for each meeting of the Audit Committee, $600 for each meeting of the Compensation Committee and the Governance and Nominating Committee, and $400 for each meeting of other committees of the
Board of Directors of the Bank that they attend. Non-employee directors are also paid fees of the same amount for meetings of Mercantile’s Board of Directors and its committees, when for Board meetings there is also not a meeting of the Board
of Directors of the Bank on the same day, and for committee meetings when there is also not a meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank having the same name or function on the same day. For meetings that are held by telephone or
other remote communications equipment, the meeting fees are half the amount described above, or if less, $350. One annual retainer fee is also paid to each director who serves as Chairman of the Audit Committees, the Compensation Committees and the
Governance and Nominating Committees of Mercantile’s and the Bank’s Boards of Directors. The annual retainer is, for the Chairman of the Audit Committees - $7,000, for the Chairman of the Compensation Committees - $5,000, and for the
Chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committees - $5,000. 
 The director who serves as Facilitator for executive sessions
of the Board of Directors of the Bank receives a fee of $400 for each executive session of the Bank’s Board of Directors for which the director serves as Facilitator. The Facilitator is also paid the same amount for executive sessions of
Mercantile’s Board of Directors when there is not also an executive session of the Bank’s Board of Directors on the same day. 
 The same persons currently serve on the Boards of Directors of Mercantile and the Bank. Under the Bank’s deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors, directors may elect to defer the
receipt of the annual retainer and meeting fees until they are no longer serving on the Board or until specific dates that they select. Directors are eligible to receive stock-based awards under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2006.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 94 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 94

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-36) is further amended by 
striking the date

              

 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 17, 2011''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 94

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JOSEFINA JUAR

EZ VILLANUEVA, Pe titione r, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 12-71840 Age n c y No. A075-643-695 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Jose fina Jua re zVilla nue va , a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions pro se for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing he r m otion to re o pe n p roc e e dings ba se d on ine ffe c tive a ssista n c e of c ounse l. W e have jurisdic tion under 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of



# FIL ED JAN 23 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

m otion to re ope n, a

nd re vie w de novo c l a im s of due proc e ss viola tions. Mohamme d

v . Gonzale

s, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing the m otion be c a u se Jua re z Villa nue va fa ile d to e sta

b l ish pre judic e from the a lle g e d

ine ffe c tive a ssista

nc e . Se e Rojas-Garc ia v . Ashc roft, 339 F.3d 814, 826 (9th C ir. 2003) (to pre va il on a n ine ffe c tive a ssista

nc e of c ounse l c la i m , pe titione r m ust de m onstra

te pre judic e ). It follows tha

t the B IA did not deny

Jua re z Villa nue va due proc e ss in de ny ing he r m otion. S

e eLata v . IN

S, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th C ir. 2000) (re q uiring e rror and pre j udic e to pre va il on a

due proc e s s c la im). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 1 8 4 0 2
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, William L. Yde III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Traffic Network, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: September 27, 2006         By:                                               /s/ William L. Yde III    William L. Yde III, Chief Executive Officer    and President  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### ILLINOIS-CALIFORNIA EXPRESS, Inc., v. ZIA ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTING COMPANY.

No. 4047.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 9, 1950.

Truman A. Stockton, Jr., and John H Lewis, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Gilbert & Gilbert, Santa Fe, N. M., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed June 1, 1950, for failure to prosecute.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 137

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the Azeri people, currently 
      divided between Azerbaijan and Iran, have the right to self-
  determination and to their own sovereign country if they so choose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2012

 Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the Azeri people, currently 
      divided between Azerbaijan and Iran, have the right to self-
  determination and to their own sovereign country if they so choose.

Whereas the Azeri people have maintained a proud and distinctive national, 
        cultural, and religious identity dating back to ancient times;
Whereas in Iran, the provinces inhabited mainly by ethnic Azeris are called East 
        and West Azerbaijan by the government in Tehran, thus giving credibility 
        to the claim that the homeland of the Azeri is divided;
Whereas the Azeri homeland was split between Russia and Persia by the Treaty of 
        Turkmenchay in 1828, without the consent of the Azeris;
Whereas the Azeris gained partial liberation when the Republic of Azerbaijan 
        gained its independence in 1991 during the collapse of the Soviet Union; 
        and
Whereas it is the policy of the United States to oppose aggression and the 
        violation of human rights inherent in the subjugation of national groups 
        like the Azeris in Iran: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Azeri people, currently 
divided between Azerbaijan and Iran, have the right to self-
determination and they should be afforded the opportunity to choose 
their own status among the community of nations, living in peace and 
harmony, without external coercion.
                                 <all>
```