alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

AFS-11-017-P 

April 15, 2011 

Mr. Randy Hansen 

Government Relations Director 

Experimental Aircraft Association 

P.O. Box 3086 

Oshkosh, WI 54903-3086 

Dear Mr. Hansen: 

In your October 13, 2010 letter, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to amend § 91.151 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

When the FAA responds to petitions for rulemaking, it must follow the requirements of 

14 CFR part 11, particularly those guidelines for processing petitions for rulemaking 

found in § 11.73. As stated in that section, the FAA uses the following criteria when 

making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition 

for rulemaking: 

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 

2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 

3) the resources we have available to address these issues. 

The FAA has very limited resources for rulemaking. These resources are dedicated to 

enhancing safety for the National Airspace System to get the best results from our limited 

resources. Your request is neither intended to address a safety concern nor would it 

affect a large user group. It would apply only to the aerobatic group of the Experimental 

Aircraft Association (EAA), the International Aerobatic Club (IAC), and that would only 

be for IAC-sanctioned competitive meets. Also, this proposed rule change would have 

no operational impact, since the EAA already has an exemption that permits the IAC to 

exercise the privileges of the proposed change. It would only relieve the EAA from the 

requirement to renew the exemption every 2 years. 
2

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are crucial to 

the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA regards your 

request for a rule change as a convenience rather than a safety issue. The FAA has been 

very responsive to the EAA in issuing an exemption that allows the EAA to operate in the 

manner requested. The only difference the proposed rulemaking would make is to allow 

the IAC, the aerobatic competition branch of the EAA, to continue to exercise these same 

privileges without the inconvenience of getting an extension to the current exemption 

every 2 years. 

The FAA must prioritize its limited rulemaking resources so as to deliver the most safety 

value to the aviation system as a whole. Therefore, this request is denied. 

Accordingly, Docket No. FAA-2007-27080 is being closed. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
#### COM. v. RYANS, A.

3448 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

CP-39-CR-0004832-2010 (Lehigh)

Affirmed
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                Certification of Chief Financial Officer
        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September  30,  2007 of the  Company  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    November 14, 2007              /S/    M. EMILY MADISON
                              ----------------------------------------------------
                                               M. Emily Madison
                                       Interim Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
No. 12M44.

No. 12M45.

No. 12M46.

No. 12M47.

No. 12M48.

No. 12M50.

#### Cooper v. Illinois Lottery Control Board; White *v.*New Jersey Department of Human Services; Wheeler-Whichard *v.*Roach et al.; Randle *v.*House of Brides; Amer *v.*United States; and Kincaid et vir *v.*Smith, Trustee.

Motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out of time denied.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Minnesota Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Minnesota Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 895,058  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 958,389   | 1,065,366 | 1,288,392 | 1,335,315 | 1,377,432 | 1,434,132 | 1,443,843 | 1,429,306 | 1,417,230 | 1,665,731
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,730,499 | 2,026,551 | 2,058,076 | 2,112,329 | 2,076,537 | 2,161,569 | 2,073,178 | 2,032,481 | 1,946,899 | 1,659,019
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,817,267 | 1,755,766 | 1,550,050 | 1,482,941 | 1,494,691 | 1,415,046 | 1,447,794 | 1,602,878 | 1,713,116 | 1,639,322
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,453,715 | 1,684,538 | 1,745,022 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 31.4

Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer Pursuant toSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241)

I, Michael A. Johnson, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 of SandRidge Energy, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                 
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

|                     | /s/ MICHAEL A. JOHNSON                                                     
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Michael A. Johnson                                                         
|                     | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
|Date: April 30, 2018 |                                                                            

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19784-19785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Streamlining Software Aspects of Certification Industry Workshop

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Industry Workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: 

Background

    In April 1997, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated 
the Streamlining Software Aspects of Certification (SSAC) program. The 
overall goal of this program is to reduce

[[Page 19785]]

the cost and time of certifying systems with software while maintaining 
or increasing system safety.
    The purpose of SSAC is: (1) To determine scientifically if the 
time/expense burden yields the safety benefits; (2) to recommend 
improvements; and (3) to prototype those improvements. The FAA 
assembled a team of experts to accomplish this purpose.
    In January 1998, the first SSAC workshop was held to gather 
industry's input regarding cost and schedule drivers. The data gathered 
from the first workshop has been analyzed and is presented in a report 
that can be accessed on the SSAC web-site: <<a href="http://
shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/ssac/">http://
shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/ssac/</a>>.

Workshop Announcement

    On May 19-21, 1998, the second SSAC Workshop will be held starting 
at 8:30 am. The workshop will be held at the Holiday Inn Fair Oaks in 
Fairfax, Virginia. The purpose of the workshop is: (1) To identify the 
three most important issues affecting certification costs and 
schedules, (2) to define a preliminary process for collecting data 
about the extent and significance of these issues, (3) to begin 
determining their root causes, and (4) to begin addressing some of the 
short-term opportunities identified at the first workshop.
    Attendance is open to the appropriate industry participants; 
however registration is required. Persons wishing to receive additional 
information or to register should visit the SSAC web-site at <<a href="http://
shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/ssac/">http://
shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/ssac/</a>> or contact the SSAC Assistant Program 
Manager, Bonnie Danner: TRW Government Information Services Division; 
One Federal System Park Drive; Fairfax, VA 22033-4416; 202-651-2254 
(phone); or 202-484-1255 (fax).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 15, 1998.
Brian Yanez,
Acting Manager, Aircraft Engineering Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-10562 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 108 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF 

4 REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY. 

5 The rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used 

6 on April 19, 2012, for a ceremony as part of the com7 memoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
2 

•HCON 108 EH 

1 Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 

2 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

3 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 21, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 108 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for 

days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19246-19247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[FE Docket No. 98-19-NG]


Office of Fossil Energy; Husky Gas Marketing Inc., Order Granting 
Long-Term Authorization to Import Natural Gas from Canada

AGENCY: Office of Fossil Energy, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19247]]

SUMMARY: The Office of Fossil Energy of the Department of Energy gives 
notice that it issued DOE/FE Order No. 1373 on April 7, 1997, granting 
Husky Gas Marketing Inc. long-term authorization to import up to 21,881 
Mcf per day of natural gas from Canada. The term extends from the date 
of authorization until August 1, 2003. This gas will be sold to San 
Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG&E). SDG&E is a public utility which 
provides electric, gas, and steam service to customers in San Diego and 
Orange counties, California. The natural gas will be imported near 
Eastport, Idaho, under a supply arrangement with Husky Oil Operations 
Ltd.
    This order is available for inspection and copying in the Office of 
Natural Gas & Petroleum Import and Export Activities, Fossil Energy, 
Room 3E-042, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20585-0350, (202) 586-9478. The docket room is open 
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

    Issued in Washington, D.C., April 13, 1998.
John W. Glynn,
Manager, Natural Gas Regulation, Office of Natural Gas & Petroleum 
Import and Export Activities, Office of Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 98-10238 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 12-6234.

#### Williams *v.*Nevada.

Sup. Ct. Nev. Certio-rari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 19694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10400]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WA 66-7141a; FRL-5998-2]

Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: 
Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve 
several minor revisions to the state of Washington Implementation Plan 
(SIP). Pursuant to section 110(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the 
Director of the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted a 
request to EPA dated December 30, 1997, to revise certain regulations 
of a local air pollution control agency, namely, the Puget Sound Air 
Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA). In the Final Rules Section of this 
Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a 
direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this 
as a noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to 
this proposed rule, no further activity is contemplated in relation to 
this rule. If the EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule 
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
May 21, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Montel Livingston, 
Environmental Protection Specialist (OAQ-107), Office of Air Quality, 
at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested 
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment 
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 
1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The State of Washington Department 
of Ecology, P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, Washington 98504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christi Lee, Washington Operations 
Office, EPA, 300 Desmond Drive, Suite #102, Lacey, Washington 98503, 
(360) 753-9079.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: April 6, 1998.
Chuck Clarke,
Regional Administrator, Region X.
[FR Doc. 98-10400 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 3, 2017

t0925 

# Order

Clerk October 3, 2017

154473

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154473

COA: 333458

Monroe CC: 15

- 041780

- FC

COURTNEY STEVEN WEST,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2016

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the de cisions in People v

Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946

- 8). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich ___ (2017),

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we a re not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Leonardo GUTIERREZ, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Appellee.

No. 4D16-4042

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services; L.T. Case No. 187898-16-AG.

Affirmed.
O rder filed January 22 , 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 331

- CV

__________

IN RE TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND ELEVEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY FIVE CENTS U.S. CURRENCY AND JERRY DEWITT SMITH

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R

Relator, Jerry Dewitt Smith , has brought a mandamus action against the

Honorable George D. “Jody” Gilles , Judge of the 142nd District Court of Midland
County, Texas

. He alleges that Judge Gilles has not ruled on several motions,
including a motion for summary judgment filed by the State on July 30, 2007, and
set for hearing on January 14, 2011; a motion for return of property filed by
Relator on August 8, 2011 ; and a m otion for summary judgment filed by Relator
on September 10, 2012

. The real party in interest, the State of Texas , is r equested to file a response to

R elator’s petition for writ of mandamus with our c ourt on or before February 6

,2 201 5

. In the interim, if this c ourt receives written notice that the motion s at issue

ha ve been ruled on by the trial court, we will deny the petition for writ of

mandamus b ecause the relief requested by R elator will have already occurred and
the issue presented in the petition wo uld then be moot

.

PER CURIAM

January 22 , 2015
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J ., and Bailey, J

.
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 96     | 2      | 0      | 3,167  | 2,340  | 1,902  | 2,284  | 2,193  | 902    | 2,502 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,268  | 2,039  | 1,094  | 3,067  | 2,628  | 2,526  | 2,283  | 2,406  | 1,760  | 2,937 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,157  | 1,664  | 1,154  | 905    | 1      | 467    | 3,446  | 738    | 758    | 1,690 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 520    | 746    | 2,930  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024