alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cassidy MCWATERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 19, 2017

Rehearing Denied October 18, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-031-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 40 

Designating September 2009 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety Month’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2009 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KAUFMAN, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mr. MENENDEZ, and Mr. LEVIN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AUGUST 6, 2009 

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 2009 as ‘‘Campus Fire Safety 

Month’’. 

Whereas, each year, States across the Nation formally designate September as Campus Fire Safety Month; 

Whereas, since January 2000, at least 129 people, including 

students, parents, and children have died in campus-related fires; 

Whereas more than 80 percent of those deaths occurred in 

off-campus residences; 

Whereas a majority of college students in the United States 

live in off-campus residences; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

SRES 40 ATS 

Whereas a number of fatal fires have occurred in buildings 

in which the fire safety systems had been compromised 

or disabled by the occupants; 

Whereas automatic fire alarm systems provide the early 

warning of a fire that is necessary for occupants and the 

fire department to take appropriate action; 

Whereas automatic fire sprinkler systems are a highly effective method of controlling or extinguishing a fire in its 

early stages, protecting the lives of the building’s occupants; 

Whereas many college students live in off-campus residences, 

fraternity and sorority housing, and residence halls that 

are not adequately protected with automatic fire sprinkler 

systems and automatic fire alarm systems; 

Whereas fire safety education is an effective method of reducing the occurrence of fires and reducing the resulting loss 

of life and property damage; 

Whereas college students do not routinely receive effective 

fire safety education during their time in college; 

Whereas it is vital to educate young people in the United 

States about the importance of fire safety to help ensure 

fire-safe behavior by young people during their college 

years and beyond; and 

Whereas, by developing a generation of fire-safe adults, future loss of life from fires may be significantly reduced: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) designates September 2009 as ‘‘Campus 

3 Fire Safety Month’’; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

SRES 40 ATS 

1 (2) encourages administrators of institutions of 

2 higher education and municipalities across the coun3 try— 

4 (A) to provide educational programs to all 

5 students during September and throughout the 

6 school year; 

7 (B) to evaluate the level of fire safety 

8 being provided in both on- and off-campus stu9 dent housing; and 

10 (C) to ensure fire-safe living environments 

11 through fire safety education, installation of fire 

12 suppression and detection systems, and the de13 velopment and enforcement of applicable codes 

14 relating to fire safety. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
No. 12-272.

#### R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al. *v.*Clay, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Clay.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,125
<INVENTORY>                                     50,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,181
<PP&E>                                          74,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,647
<BONDS>                                         94,841
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           833
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,993
<SALES>                                         85,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,274
<CGS>                                           55,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,065
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,888
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,621
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,621
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

23369

Federal Register

Vol. 63, No. 82

Wednesday, April 29, 1998

Title 3—

The President

Proclamation 7087 of April 24, 1998

Jewish Heritage Week, 1998

By the President of the United States of America

A Proclamation

America’s first Jewish immigrants arrived on our shores from Europe more

than 100 years before the American Revolution. In subsequent decades,

millions more Jewish men and women would follow, fleeing persecution,

pogroms, and the horrors of the Holocaust, seeking a new life of freedom

and opportunity for themselves and their children. While many came here

in poverty, they brought with them the riches of their ancient Jewish heritage:

faith in God; a strong commitment to family and community; a tradition

of service to others; and a deep love of learning and the arts.

Drawing on these many strengths, Jewish citizens have made extraordinary

contributions to every aspect of American life. Acutely conscious of the

dangers of racism, prejudice, and political oppression, American Jews have

been strong and effective advocates in the cause of social justice. They

have dedicated their energies, talents, and resources to ensure that our

Nation lives up to its promise of equality, making a lasting impact in

the struggle for civil rights, labor reform, and women’s equality. The Jewish

philanthropic tradition, dating back to ancient times, has flourished in America, bringing hope and help to those in need through numerous Jewish

charitable organizations and activities. In public service and education, in

science and medicine, in entertainment, law, the arts, and many other fields

of endeavor, Jewish men and women strengthen our national community

and uphold the fundamental American ideals of faith, community, compassion, and responsibility.

Every spring, we set aside this special time to celebrate the many gifts

that American Jews bring to our national life. This year, we also join with

Jews around the world in celebrating the 50th anniversary of the founding

of the modern state of Israel. This milestone is a tribute to the strength

and resilience of the Jewish spirit in the face of great adversity. Israel’s

achievements in the past 5 decades of challenge and conflict continue to

inspire all Americans and teach us anew the power of the human spirit

to build reality out of our dreams.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, WILLIAM J. CLINTON, President of the United States

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 26 through May

3, 1998, as Jewish Heritage Week. I urge all Americans to observe this

week with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
23370 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 82 / Wednesday, April 29, 1998 / Presidential Documents

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-fourth

day of April, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and ninety-eight,

and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred

[FR Doc. 98–11531

Filed 4–28–98; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P

and twenty-second.

œ–
#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Jerome W. ARMSTRONG, Petitioner

No. 275 EAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 4, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017,- the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
MAXXAM INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND
                                 COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>
                                           Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                              September 30,             September 30,
                                       -------------------------    ------------------------
                                           1996          1995        1996          1995
                                       -----------   -----------    ----------   -----------
                                           (In millions of dollars, except share and per share
                                                                amounts)
<S>                                     <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
Weighted average common and common
     equivalent shares outstanding
     during each period                  9,377,029     9,376,703     9,376,812     9,376,703
Common equivalent shares
     attributable to stock options
     and convertible securities             89,465       102,229        91,871        81,526
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------    ----------
     Total common and common
          equivalent shares              9,466,494     9,478,932     9,468,683     9,458,229
                                       ===========   ===========   ===========    ==========

Net income                             $       5.3   $      10.7   $      28.0    $     35.1
                                       ===========   ===========   ===========    ==========

Net income per common and common
     equivalent share                  $       .56   $      1.13   $      2.96    $     3.71
                                       ===========   ===========   ===========    ==========

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20166-20167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Two Forks Timber Sales and Other Projects, Siskiyou National 
Forest, Curry County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.


[[Page 20167]]


ACTION: Cancellation of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 25, 1992, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Two Forks Timber Sales and 
Other Projects on the Chetco Range District of the Siskiyou National 
Forest was published in the Federal Register (57 FR 6490). A Notice of 
Availability for the draft EIS was published in the Federal Register on 
May 22, 1992 (57 FR 21792). After an extension of the comment period on 
the draft EIS, the comment period ended July 20, 1992. Forest Service 
has decided to cancel the environmental analysis process. An EIS was 
being prepared because timber harvest was proposed in an inventoried 
roadless area. This area was designated as Late-Successional Reserve 
under the Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and 
Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents Within the Range of the 
Northern Spotted Owl. Timber harvest is no longer planned in this area 
at this time. The NOI is hereby rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
cancellation to Bill Blackwell, Resource Planner, Gold Beach Ranger 
District, 29279 Ellensburg, Gold Beach, Oregon 97444. (541) 247-3600.

    Dated: April 13, 1998.
J. Michael Lunn,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-10785 Filed 4-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Kentucky Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Kentucky Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 2,948,517
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,963,545 | 2,826,802 | 3,023,149 | 3,143,992 | 3,577,873 | 3,507,584 | 3,878,714 | 3,433,137 | 2,876,176 | 2,879,517
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,771,153 | 2,928,334 | 2,525,588 | 2,775,457 | 2,492,991 | 2,139,473 | 1,999,877 | 2,410,574 | 2,547,650 | 2,615,210
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,403,440 | 2,446,717 | 1,814,799 | 1,275,890 | 1,649,228 | 1,498,018 | 1,624,241 | 1,707,559 | 2,088,607 | 2,050,983
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,345,402 | 2,561,021 | 2,400,009 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,
Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh,
Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 2 1 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk October 2 1 , 2020

159 194 ( 83 ) (84)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 159 194

v COA: 338586

Eaton CC: 13

- 020404

- FC

ERNESTO EVARISTO URIBE

, Defendant

- Appellant.
_____________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on September 25 , 2020, is accepted as timely filed. On further order of the Chief Justice, the

motion of plaintiff

- appelle e to extend the time for filing its supplemental brief is

GRANTED IN PART

. Plaintiff

- appellee is given a 28

- day extension for filing its supplemental brief , not the 194

- day extension requested. The supplemental brief is due on

or before November 13 , 2020

.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Connecticut Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Connecticut Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 234,593
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 227,723 | 239,690 | 336,972 | 302,126 | 324,576 | 410,639 | 388,927 | 396,610 | 342,482 | 383,598
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 427,221 | 369,145 | 401,453 | 390,760 | 392,087 | 429,895 | 454,051 | 491,456 | 461,815 | 487,054
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 558,082 | 602,876 | 612,920 | 543,700 | 541,355 | 564,179 | 512,510 | 558,581 | 620,501 | 622,173
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 621,454 | 628,055 | 612,711 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. EC96-19-026 and ER96-1663-027]


California Power Exchange; Notice of Filing

April 20, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 10, 1998, the California Power Exchange 
Corporation (PX), filed for Commission acceptance in this docket, 
pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act, an application to 
amend the PX Operating Agreement and Tariff (including Protocols) (PX 
Tariff) for the Hour-Ahead Market implementation. The PX requests that 
the proposed PX Tariff amendments be made effective as of June 8, 1998, 
or sooner if the PX is able to complete testing.
    In this submittal, the PX proposed PX Tariff and Protocol 
amendments that would be placed into effect to operate the PX Hour-
Ahead Market. To implement a start-up date sooner than June 8, 1998, 
the PX requested that it be allowed to provide notice, at least fifteen 
(15) days in advance of start-up, to the Commission and to post such 
notice on the PX Home Page. This procedure is similar to the one that 
the Commission required the PX to follow in the start-up of the Day-
Ahead Market.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before May 1, 1998. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this application are on file with the 
Commission and available for public inspection.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11301 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**RATIO OF EARNINGS TO  FIXED CHARGES****EXHIBIT 12**

**Three Months Ended March 31, 2001**

*(In Thousands)*

****Earnings******Income before interest expense $13,394Add:Income tax items 5,301Income tax on other income 595AFUDC - borrowed funds 50Interest on rentals 248 Total earnings before interest and taxes $19,588**Fixed Charges******Interest on long-term debt $ 3,306Other interest 524Interest on rentals* 248 Total fixed charges $ 4,078**Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**4.80x**

*Represents one-third of the total rental expense.