alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1056 

To amend title 35, United States Code, with respect to false marking. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2011 

Mr. ISSA (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

and Mr. COBLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, with respect to 

false marking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent Continuing Dis5 closure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FALSE MARKING. 

7 Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(c)(1) Any person who makes, uses, offers for sale, 

10 or sells within the United States, or imports into the 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1056 IH

1 United States, an item that is affixed with the word ‘pat2 ent’ and is accompanied by a number for a patent that 

3 has been granted by the Patent and Trademark Office to 

4 that person for that item shall not be fined under this 

5 section after the patent expires if— 

6 ‘‘(A) no change in the manufacturing or pro7 duction process of the item occurs after the expira8 tion of the patent; or 

9 ‘‘(B) in a case in which a change in the manu10 facturing or production process of the item occurs 

11 after the expiration of the patent, the word ‘expired’ 

12 is placed before the word ‘patent’ or the patent num13 ber. 

14 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term 

15 ‘change in the manufacturing or production process’ of an 

16 item means an intentional expansion, enhancement, im17 provement, or repair, that suspends, for a period of at 

18 least 24 hours, the normal operating procedures through 

19 which the item is assembled, made, crafted, manufactured, 

20 built, or fabricated from individual components or raw ma21 terials, or both.’’. 

22 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY. 

23 The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to any 

24 case pending on the date of the enactment of this Act and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1056 IH

1 to any case commenced on or after such date of enact2 ment. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11574]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-191-000]

Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc; Notice of Petition for Waiver

April 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 22, 1998, Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc. 
(Texas-Ohio) tendered for filing a petition for waiver of the 
electronic communications and Internet transaction requirements of the 
Commission's Order Nos. 587-B, 587-C, and 587-G.
    Texas-Ohio states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all 
of its jurisdictional customers and to affected state regulatory 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as on or 
before May 4, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11574 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
**Exhibit 15.1**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Mercury General Corporation: 

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheetof Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006, and the relatedconsolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial informationconsists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be inconformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We have previously audited, inaccordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 26, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

May 8, 2007
Amendment No. 1 to GMX Resources Inc.



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Amendment No. 1 to 
 GMX RESOURCES INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”), dated effective as of March 14, 2012, to GMX Resources Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as effective on the date
hereof, the “Plan”), as approved by the Board of Directors of GMX Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), is hereby adopted by the Company. 
 WITNESSETH 
 WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan; and

 WHEREAS, subject to certain limitations, Section 11.1 of the Plan gives the Committee the authority to amend the
Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to add
Section 3.6 to prohibit the repricing of Options (as defined in the Plan) or SARs (as defined in the Plan) without shareholder approval; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to make the following amendment to the Plan effective. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The Plan is
hereby amended to add the following Section 3.6: 
 Section 3.6. No Repricing of Options or SARs.
The Committee shall have no authority to make any adjustment (other than in connection with a change in capitalization or other transaction where an adjustment is permitted or required under the terms of the Plan) or amendment, and no such
adjustment or amendment shall be made, that reduces or would have the effect of reducing the exercise price of an Option or SAR previously granted under the Plan, whether through amendment, cancellation and exchange for cash or replacement grants,
or other means, unless the Company’s shareholders shall have approved such adjustment or amendment 
 Except as expressly
amended herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
193P16

#### State v. Calvin Renard Carter

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-1234)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s Motion to Deem as Timely Filed the Response to PDR

1. Allowed 05/24/2016

2. Allowed

3. Allowed

4. Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 35 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 35

     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2011

Mr. Alexander submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 
  Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a 
               correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 1473) making appropriations 
for the Department of Defense and the other departments and agencies of 
the Government for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, and for 
other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make 
the following correction: At the end of title VIII of division B, 
insert the following new section:
    ``Sec. 18__.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 
the funds made available in this Act or any previous Act may be used to 
carry out the provisions of Public Law 111-148, or any amendment made 
by such Public Law, or title I or subtitle B of title II of Public Law 
111-152, or any amendment made by such title or subtitle.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period endedJune 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("theReport"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2005
# C_2019341EN.01000401.xml

| 9.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/4

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2019/C 341/04)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 34, after the Explanatory note to subheading ‘0305 10 00 Flours, meals and pellets of fish, fit for human consumption’, the following text is inserted:

| ‘0305 20 00 | Livers, roes and milt of fish, dried, smoked, salted or in brine

  This subheading includes, inter alia, salted hard roes intended for the manufacture of caviar or caviar substitutes.
  These roes are unsuitable for immediate consumption as caviar or caviar substitutes. Although they might be intended for human consumption, they are not consumable as caviar or caviar substitutes in the state as presented without further processing. Such processing includes for instance additional cleaning to remove adherent organs or rinsing to lower the salt content in order to render the product suitable for human consumption.
  This subheading excludes hard roes suitable for immediate consumption as caviar or caviar substitutes (heading 1604).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘0305 20 00

Livers, roes and milt of fish, dried, smoked, salted or in brine

This subheading includes, inter alia, salted hard roes intended for the manufacture of caviar or caviar substitutes.

These roes are unsuitable for immediate consumption as caviar or caviar substitutes. Although they might be intended for human consumption, they are not consumable as caviar or caviar substitutes in the state as presented without further processing. Such processing includes for instance additional cleaning to remove adherent organs or rinsing to lower the salt content in order to render the product suitable for human consumption.

This subheading excludes hard roes suitable for immediate consumption as caviar or caviar substitutes (heading 1604).’

On page 81, after the Explanatory note to subheading ‘1604 20 05 Preparations of surimi’, the following text is inserted:

On page 81, after the Explanatory note to subheading ‘1604 20 05 Preparations of surimi’

| ‘1604 31 00 and 1604 32 00 | Caviar and caviar substitutes

  These subheadings also include frozen products.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1604 31 00 and 1604 32 00

Caviar and caviar substitutes

These subheadings also include frozen products.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(2)  OJ C 119, 29.3.2019, p. 1.

2

---
094P17

#### State v. Edward Charles Green

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Voter Fraud Dismissal

Dismissed
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Washington Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Washington Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 392,469   | 413,008   | 425,624  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 458,013   | 492,189   | 528,913   | 565,475   | 604,315   | 638,603   | 673,357   | 702,701   | 737,208   | 779,104  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 813,319   | 841,617   | 861,943   | 895,800   | 926,510   | 966,199   | 997,728   | 1,025,171 | 1,047,319 | 1,059,239
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,067,979 | 1,079,277 | 1,088,762 | 1,102,318 | 1,118,193 | 1,133,629 | 1,153,183 | 1,173,994 | 1,194,375 | 1,220,197
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,232,852 | 1,251,963 | 1,271,260 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Nevada Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Nevada Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        | 53     | 30     | 21     | 16     | 13     | 11     | 9      | 9      | 8     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 7      | 6      | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
391A16

#### Next Advisor Continued, Inc. v. LendingTree, Inc. et al.

Court Order

Appeal Dismissed *ex mero motu 12/14/2016*
#### Caslelderrick BLACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-2559

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10352]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Fitness Determination of Express Air, Inc.

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Commuter Air Carrier Fitness Determination Order to 
Show Cause (Order 98-4-16).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is proposing to find Express 
Air, Inc., fit, willing, and able, to provide commuter air carrier 
operations under 49 U.S.C. 41738.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
April 29, 1998.

ADDRESSES: All interested persons wishing to respond to the Department 
of Transportation's tentative fitness determination should file their 
responses with the Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56, Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Room 6401, Washington, D.C. 
20590, and serve them on all persons listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delores King, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590, (202) 366-2343.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-10352 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
Exhibit 23.2**Preferred Insurance Capital Consultants, LLC** 55 NE 5th Avenue, Suite 502 2130 Golden Eagle Drive, W.Boca Raton, FL 33432 Tallahassee, FL 32312Telephone: (561) 241-9974 Telephone: (850) 893-1903Facsimile: (561) 241-9984 Facsimile: (850) 893-1948April 17, 2007   **Re:** **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACTUARIAL CONSULTING FIRM**     As an independent insurance management and actuarial consulting firm,Preferred Insurance Capital Consultants, LLC (PICC) hereby consents tothe use of our name in this Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by GlobalEmployment Holdings, Inc.   Yours truly,  /s/ Anthony J. Grippa     Anthony J. Grippa, FCAS, MAAA, FCA
----

**EXHIBIT      10.25**

**McMoRan      EXPLORATION CO.**

**RESTRICTED      STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT**

**UNDER      THE 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

(a)           Pursuant      to the McMoRan Exploration Co. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the      Participant is hereby granted effective the Grant Date ___________ restricted      stock units (“Restricted Stock Units” or “RSUs”) on the terms and conditions set      forth in this Agreement and in the Plan.

----

----

----

----

----
117P17

#### Yahudah Washitaw of East Terra Indians, David Hopskins, Kerklon Stackhouse, Maurice Stackhouse (Deceased), Shawn Singletary, and Betty Singletary v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, JP Morgan Chase BK NA, Nations Star, CIT Group/Sales Financing Inc., and State of North Carolina

Petitioners’ *Pro Se*Motion for Removal from State Court

Dismissed
No. 12-6492.

#### Da Vang *v.*Hoover.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.