alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                    
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Other States Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Other States Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 826,576
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 810,100 | 784,362 | 800,913 | 788,472 | 774,724 | 759,728 | 805,491 | 736,679 | 775,235 | 800,579
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 866,902 | 776,303 | 820,849 | 884,232 | 906,075 | 907,965 | 875,830 | 885,582 | 819,635 | 795,531
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 777,957 | 758,219 | 722,721 | 671,364 | 628,854 | 577,660 | 559,985 | 517,698 | 485,675 | 456,024
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 435,117 | 401,892 | 391,046 | 369,584 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019141EN.01000102.xml

| 17.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9318 — Colisée/Armonea)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 141/02)

On 10 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Jeff SALDANA, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-939

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 1, 2017

L.T. No.: 2012-CF-3359

Dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 44307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18368]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7965]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of the Islamic 
Resistance Movement (Hamas and Other Aliases)

    As a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant to Section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended
    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 determination to 
maintain the designation of the aforementioned organization as a 
foreign terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to 
warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of 
the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 18, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-18368 Filed 7-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|New York Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|New York Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 4,071,620 | 4,081,435 | 4,059,953
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,039,051 | 3,996,254 | 3,983,342 | 3,930,196 | 3,899,298 | 3,931,960 | 3,950,150 |           |           |          
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,603,700 | 3,552,891 | 3,478,107 | 3,465,943 | 3,503,131 | 3,595,511 | 3,697,386 | 3,760,880 | 3,915,334 | 4,024,167
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,080,590 | 4,183,615 | 4,289,765 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 28, 2020

No. 04-19-00212-CR

Sean Leroy HAYS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-0232-CR-A

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On December 30, 2019, this order granted appellant’s pro se motion to access the 

appellate record and ordered the district clerk to send a full and complete duplicate copy of the 

clerk’s record and the reporter’s record to appellant. On January 17, 2020, the district clerk filed 

written notice in this court that the record was mailed to appellant.

On January 21, 2020, this court received a letter from appellant dated January 15, 2020, 

requesting an extension of time to file a pro se brief because appellant had not yet received the 

appellate record. Because the appellate record has now been mailed to appellant, it is ORDERED 

that appellant’s pro se brief, should he choose to file one, is due no later than thirty (30) days 

from the date of this order. It is further ORDERED that if the appellant files a pro se brief, the 

State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty (30) days after the date the appellant’s pro se 

brief is filed in this court.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 15 84

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el le e

v.

Alv in Hard y

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l App el la nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Ju ly 30, 2 01 2 Fil ed : Au gu st 10 , 20 12 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, ARNOLD, an d S MITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.A l v i n H a r d y a p p e a l s t h e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r co m m it ti ng hi m to th e cu st od y of 1 th e Att or ne y

Gene ral un de r 18 U.S.C. § 4 24 6, an d we a ffi rm

.

Sect io n 42 46 pr ov id es fo r th e in de fin it e ho sp it al iz at io n of a pe rs on , ag ai ns t

w ho m cri m in al ch arg es were di sm is se d so le ly fo r reas on s rel at ed to th e men t a l

co nd it io n of th e pe rs on , if th e pe rs on is fo un d- -b y cl ear an d co nv in ci ng ev id en ce aft er

a he ari ng --t o be su ffer in g fro m a m en ta l di se as e or de fect su ch th at hi s rel eas e wou ld

crea te a su bs ta nt ia l ris k of bo di ly i nju ry to an ot he r pe rs on or se rio us da m ag e to th e pr op ert y of an ot he r. See 18 U.S.C. § 42 46 (a)- (d ). In th is cas e, th e di st r i c t c o ur t fo un d th at co m

m it m en t was ap pr op ria te be cau se st at e pl acement was un av ai la bl e an d th e m en ta l he al th pr of

es si on al s who ex am in ed Hard y un an im ou sl y be li ev ed th at hi s

m en ta l il ln es s an d hi st or y of no nc om pl ia nc e wit h m ed ic at io n, wit h res ul ti ng pa ran oi d

an d t hr eat en in g b eh av io r, wou ld crea te a ri sk of da ng ero us ne ss wit hi n th e m ean in g of se ct io n 42 46 if Hard y were un co nd it io na ll y rel eas ed

. W e ho ld th at th is fin di ng is

no t cl earl y erro ne ou s. See Uni te d St at es v. W il li am s, 29 9 F.3 d 67 3, 67 6- 77 (8 th Ci r. 20 02 ) (s ta nd ard of

rev ie w). W e n ot e th at Hard y ’s cus to di an s ar e u nd er an on go in g ob li ga ti on to pr ep are an nu al rep or ts co nc ern in g hi s m en ta l co nd it io n an d th e ne ed fo r hi s co nt in ue d ho sp it al iz at io n, se e 18 U.S.C. § 42 47 (e)( 1) (B), an d to ex ert reas on ab le effo rts to pl ace h im

in a su it ab le st at e fac il it y , see 18 U.S.C. § 4 24 6( d)

.

A c c or di ng ly, th e jud gm en t is affi rm ed , an d co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd r a w i s gr an te d.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ri ch ard E. Dor r, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da t i on s of th e Hon or ab le Ja m es C. Eng la nd , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te J u dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri.

-2

-
018A14-2

#### State v. Paris Jujuan Todd

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-670)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent

4. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

5. Court’s Order

1. Allowed 09/02/2016

2. Allowed

3.-

4.-

5. Special Order *ex mero motu*
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1176 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1176

  To amend the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 to include 
                  farmed shellfish as specialty crops.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2011

 Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. DeLauro) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 to include 
                  farmed shellfish as specialty crops.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shellfish Marketing Assistance 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. FARMED SHELLFISH AS SPECIALTY CROPS.

    Section 3(1) of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness Act of 2004 
(Public Law 108-465; 7 U.S.C. 1621 note) is amended by inserting 
``farmed shellfish,'' after ``fruits,''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Arizona Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Arizona Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           | 545       | 567,962   | 564,195   | 572,461  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 586,866   | 642,659   | 604,899   | 610,337   | 635,335   | 661,192   | 689,597   | 724,911   | 764,167   | 802,469  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 846,016   | 884,789   | 925,927   | 957,442   | 993,885   | 1,042,662 | 1,088,574 | 1,119,266 | 1,128,264 | 1,130,047
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,138,448 | 1,146,286 | 1,157,688 | 1,172,003 | 1,186,794 | 1,200,773 | 1,215,692 | 1,234,912 | 1,252,498 | 1,277,421
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,306,008 | 1,330,138 | 1,358,116 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
Exhibit 35.1







Annual Statement of Compliance





VIA: EMAIL





MS Structured Asset Corp.


1585 Broadway


New York, New York 10036





Re:
Trust Agreement, between MS Structured Asset Corp. (the “Depositor”) and LaSalle Bank National Association (the “Trustee”), made as of the date February 15, 2006 relating to TILES Trust No. 2006-1.





I, Thomas M. O’Connor, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1) A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
 
 (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year except that, with respect to the distribution reports that were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on (x) March 1, 2010, (i) the Balance in the Underlying Information section should have been reported as $12,700,000 instead of $20,000,000, (ii)  the Next Swap Rate for Tiles Trust No, 2006-1 should have been reported as 3.98%  instead of 0.00%, (iii) Swap Recipient was unreported and should have been reported as Morgan Stanley, (iv) Swap Amount Received for Morgan Stanley should have been reported as $402,907.50, (v) Next Swap Rate for Morgan Stanley should have been reported as 6.345% and (vi) the Amount Received in the Underlying Information section should have been reported as $402,907.50 instead of $634,500.00; and (y) August 17, 2010 (i) the Current Rate in the Underlying Information section should have been reported as 6.345% instead of 3.98% and the Next Rate should have been reported as 6.345% instead of 2.99%, (ii) Swap Recipient was  unreported and should have been reported as Morgan Stanley, (iii) Swap Amount Received for Morgan Stanley was unreported and should have been reported as $402,907.50, and (iv) Next Swap Rate for Morgan Stanley was unreported and should have been reported as 6.345%.   These errors are expected to be corrected on or before August 31, 2011 and a revised remittance report is expected to be sent on or before August 31, 2011.
 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
 
 
 
 Date: March 25, 2011


Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/ Thomas M. O’Connor


Thomas M. O’Connor


Senior Vice President
EGU MACT -- Interagency Comments 

12/09/2011 05:43 PM 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cc: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Hi Bob, 

Attached are interagency comments on the Feasibility TSD and on the acid 

gas floor. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

EGUMACT_EO12866InteragencyComments_Dec92011.docx