alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Massena, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 13,642 | 12,927 | 9,184  | 7,258 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7,309  | 6,931  | 7,662  | 6,817  | 7,357  | 6,989  | 6,588  | 6,887  | 6,588  | 5,730 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5,595  | 3,965  | 3,992  | 4,147  | 3,819  | 3,049  | 2,770  | 2,843  | 3,567  | 3,655 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,125  | 3,144  | 3,151  | 2,718  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
No. 12-5624.

#### Cox *v.*Small, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reco rd o f Discussion Docket No. f' AA- Directorate Identifi er: -A D

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discu sse d (i
. e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA , RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANI ZAT ION PERSON CONTACTED DATE T OP I CS DISCUS SED B oei ng Steve Chapman 10 / 28/ 2013 Other. List below. Boein g J oan Lenker 12/ 4/20 1 3 Other. Li st be l ow. Boein g A l a n Marx 1 0/2812013 & Other. List below. 12/4/20 1 3

' 

# .

O the r /Ad di tiona l Inform ation: Because the r i sk i s fairly lo w , Boeing's p osition i s th at a compliance time of 12 months is appropriate to address the uns afe cond itio n w ithout putting undue burden on the operato rs. Howe ve r, this AD w ill b e correc ting at least 3 safe ty issues including COS #20 1 3-0947/-1 028 (flap s up landing issue), COS #2013-1300/- 1 350 (single fl ap position se n sor failure causing fligh t control s to transition to seco ndary mod e i ss ue), and COS #2 012-1272 (sing le spo il e r failure n eeds E I CA S alert) and w ill al so be correcting numerou s n o n- c omplian ces. A lthough , quan titati vel y , the 12 month co mpliance time is w i thin our control program fleet risk threshold, our g uidance requires we co rrect the unsafe cond itio n as s oon as reaso nably practica l. Since this is o nly a S/W update that will take a few hours , we don't feel a co mpli a nce time of 6 month s put s undue burd e n on the operators. Co ntingent approval of Service Bu ll e tin B787- 81205-SB270020-00 I ssue 001

- FLIGHT CONTROLS

- Primary Flight Control F unction

- Fli ght Co ntro l E lectronics B lo ck Point 3 Software Change required a 6 month comp liance time.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3364

___________ Barbara Foots, * * Appellant, * * v. * * The Southwest Regional Wilderness * Appeal from the United States Camp, An agency of the State of * District Court for the Arkansas; Jerry K. Walsh, Executive * Western District of Arkansas. Director of the Southwest Regional * Wilderness Camp, an agency of the *

[UNPUBLISHED] State of Arkansas; John Kilgore, * Sheriff of Lafayette County, Arkansas, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 19, 1998 Filed: March 4, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The HONORABLE HARRY F. BARNES, United States District Judge for the 1 Western District of Arkansas. -2- Barba ra Foots appeals the district court & s judgmen t 1 for defendants following a bench trial in her actio n alleging employment discrimination, civil right s violations, and-3-

pen dent state law claims. After careful review of th e record and the parties & briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 12-6343.

#### Whipple *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. STAIR, R.

1217 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/01/2017

CP-02-CR-0014326-2015

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Financial Data Schedule  (FDS)
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000063917
<NAME> MCDONNELL DOUGLAS
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         567
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  879
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,652
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                       4,037
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,591)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                      2,990 <F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       213
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,948
<SALES>                                      9,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,743
<CGS>                                        7,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                911
<INCOME-TAX>                                   330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            581
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   581
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2.66
<FN>
<F1>(1) Mortgages and similar debt.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of the Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Betawave Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Lennox L. Vernon, Chief Accounting Officer and Director of Operations of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 31, 2010








/s/ Lennox L. VernonLennox L. VernonChief Accounting Officer and Director of Operations(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 12A364.

#### In re Flores.

Application to file petition for writ of mandamus in excess of the word limits, addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court, denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20246-20247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration


Denial of Motor Vehicle Defect Petition

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Denial of petition for a defect investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the reasons for the denial of a 
petition submitted to NHTSA under 49 U.S.C. 30162, requesting that the 
agency commence a proceeding to determine the existence of a defect 
related to motor vehicle safety. The petition is hereinafter identified 
as DP98-003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. George Chiang, Office of Defects 
Investigation (ODI), NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 
20590. Telephone: (202) 366-5206.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Ms. Lisa Smith of Newburgh, Indiana, 
submitted a petition dated February 24, 1998, requesting that an 
investigation be initiated to determine whether Model Year (MY) 1989 
Chrysler minivans (Voyagers) contain a defect related to motor vehicle 
safety within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301. The petition 
alleges that MY 1989 Plymouth Voyagers have a defective automatic 
transmission that can fail early in the life of the vehicle and require 
a costly repair.
    In her petition letter, Ms. Smith stated that ``I am filing this 
petition against the Chrysler Plymouth Corp. for their failure to 
produce a quality transmission in the 1989 minivans (Voyagers). 
Starting in 1989 model vans they installed a transmission that was 
faulty in its performance * * * I feel Chrysler is putting quantity 
before quality * * * I request you have a hearing on this costly issue. 
In the meantime I will be paying my repair bill for my 3rd 
transmission.''
    Clearly, failure of her transmission with the high cost of its 
replacement is

[[Page 20247]]

frustrating to the petitioner. While frustrating, the type of 
transmission problem the petitioner described is not related to motor 
vehicle safety. The agency has no jurisdiction over non-safety defects, 
warranty, dealership, and remuneration matters.
    Accordingly, it is unlikely that NHTSA would issue an order for the 
notification and remedy of a safety-related defect in the subject 
vehicles at the conclusion of the investigation requested in the 
petition. Therefore, the petition is denied.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30162(d); delegations of authority at CFR 
1.50 and 501.8.
Kenneth N. Weinstein,
Associate Administrator for Safety Assurance.
[FR Doc. 98-10834 Filed 4-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
**Exhibit 31.4**
**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:

	a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

	b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial; and

	b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Terry  A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDate: May 10, 2004****
EXHIBIT 31.3  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: November 7, 2006
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Alaska Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)  
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Alaska Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)  
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 263,896 | 276,251 | 286,280 | 314,643 | 300,635 | 340,247 | 355,398 | 373,797
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 381,431 | 409,382 | 411,593 | 398,093 | 524,457 | 434,498 | 442,375 | 426,776 | 426,528 | 424,555
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 419,671 | 435,291 | 428,595 | 456,441 | 438,855 | 459,326 | 420,086 | 407,153 | 374,105 | 374,152
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 353,391 | 334,671 | 329,789 | 317,503 | 326,876 | 326,157 | 315,233 | 325,082 | 321,494 | 309,504
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 318,581 | 333,617 | 351,011 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00048-CR

RONALD TYRONE PACE, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 41560-A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Tyrone Pace, appellant, filed a notice of appeal March 22, 2013, from his 

conviction of assault. Pace also filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court subsequently 

granted. As a result of the favorable ruling on his motion for a new trial, Pace now seeks to 

dismiss his pending appeal.

The trial court’s grant of “a new trial restores the case to its position before the former 

trial . . . .” TEX. R. APP. P. 21.9(b). Because there is no conviction from which to appeal, we 

have no jurisdiction to consider Pace’s appeal. See Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643–44 

(Tex. App.—Dallas 1996, no pet.).

Consequently, Pace’s motion to dismiss is granted, and we dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 13, 2013

Date Decided: May 14, 2013

Do Not Publish
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|Other States Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|Other States Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        | 4,800  | 8,086  | 7,792  | 7,503  | 7,815  | 2,354  | 2,139  | 1,293  | 1,150 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 8      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 11,164 | 7,333  | 5,813  | 6,161 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,555  | 6,659  | 17,909 | 17,718 | 2,682  | 5,026  | 11,835 | 14,162 | 14,636 | 4,599 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5,325  | 8,106  | 7,584  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024