alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
427A16

#### Abrons Family Practice and Urgent Care, PA; Nash OB-GYN Associates, PA; Highland Obstetrical-Gynecological Clinic, PA; Children’s Health of Carolina, PA; Capital Nephrology Associates, PA; Hickory Allergy & Asthma Clinic, PA; Halifax Medical Specialists, PA; and Westside OB-GYN Center, PA; Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. NC Department of Health and Human Services and Computer Sciences Corporation

1. Defs (Computer Sciences Corporation) Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent (COA15-1197)

2. Defs (Computer Sciences Corporation) PDR as to Additional Issues

3. Defs (NCDHHS) Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent

4. Defs (NCDHHS) PDR as to Additional Issues

1.—

2. Allowed

3. -

4. Allowed
No. 12-6362.

#### In re Avena.

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
#### State v. Kantor

109,057

12/27/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### Martha GOMEZ, Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.

No. 4D16-2406

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 20, 2017]

Jonathan Kline of Jonathan Kline, P.A., Weston, for appellant,

Kimberly Si Mello and Danielle M. Diaz of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa, and Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

*Affirmed. See Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sheikha,*221 So.3d 657 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Gross, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ.,. concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 25129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-12060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Solucorp Industries, Ltd.; Order of Suspension of Trading

April 30, 1998
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Solucorp Industries Ltd. (``Solucorp'') because of questions regarding 
the accuracy of assertions by Solucorp in documents sent to and 
statements made to market makers of the stock of Solucorp, other broker 
dealers, and to investors concerning, among other things: (1) the 
negotiation, existence and terms of contracts entered into by Solucorp 
during the period July 1, 1995 through the present; (2) revenues 
purportedly accrued under a license agreement with Smart International 
Ltd. and reported in financial statements for the quarter ended 
September 30, 1997 and the six-month period ended December 31, 1997, 
which were included in a registration statement and transition report 
filed with the Commission in December 1997 and April 1998, 
respectively; and (3) revenues projected in press releases on August 
27, 1997, October 24, 1997 and April 16, 1998.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST, May 1, 1998 
through 11:59 p.m. EST, on May 14, 1998.

    By the Commission.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-12060 Filed 5-1-98; 3:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
AMENDMENT NO. 1

   AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of August 19, 1999 to Loan and Pledge Agreement
dated AS OF OCTOBER 21, 1997 (THE "LOAN AGREEMENT"), BETWEEN CUSTODIAL TRUST
COMPANY ("Bank"), a bank and trust company organized and existing under the laws
of the State of New JERSEY, AND MAXXAM INC. ("Borrower"), a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.

   WHEREAS, Borrower wishes to extend by one year the lending arrangement set
forth in the Loan Agreement, and Bank is willing to grant such extension;

   NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

   1. AMENDMENTS. (a) Section 4(c) of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to
read in its entirety as follows: "Borrower shall repay the Term Loan in its
entirety on the third anniversary of the date of this Agreement." All other
terms and conditions in the Loan Agreement remain unchanged.

   2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Amendment No. 1 shall be effective as of the date
hereof.

   3. GOVERNING LAW. This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the
conflict of law principles thereof.

   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused this Amendment No. 1 to
the Loan Agreement to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its
representative thereunto duly authorized, all as of the day and year first above
written.

MAXXAM INC.

BY:      /S/ PAUL N. SCHWARTZ

Name:    Paul N. Schwartz
Title:   President

CUSTODIAL TRUST COMPANY

BY:      /S/ RONALD D. WATSON

Name:    Ronald D. Watson
Title:   President
224P16

#### State v. James Michael Smith

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-614)

Denied
326P15-4

#### Burl Anderson Howell v. North Carolina Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, by and through, Reese Phelps; Lou Jones

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Reconsideration

Dismissed
No. 12-5927.

#### Lacey *v.*Braxton, Warden, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
D. S., FATHER OF E. R. S., a MINOR CHILD

, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSI TION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3897

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 16, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

.
James W. Crawford, Pensacola , for Appellant.

Kelley Sch aeffer, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford; Dwight O. Slater, Children's Legal Services, Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of

September 28, 201 5, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to

demonstrate that the appeal was timely filed. See St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry , 249

So. 2d 27 (Fla. 1971); Churchville v. Ocean Grove R.V. Sales, Inc. , 876 So. 2d2 649, 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“A n amendment or modification of an order or

judgment in an immaterial, insubstantial way does not restart the clock to file an

appeal”). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Any remedy the appellant

may have lies with the lower tribunal. See In th e Interest of E.H. , 609 So. 2d 1289

(Fla. 1992).

BENTON, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, J J

. , CONCUR.
# C_2019060EN.01000202.xml

| 15.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9203 — Pierburg/Xingfu/Xingfu Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 60/03)

On 5 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>    UT
<LEGEND>     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
             THE BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, RETAINED
             EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS OF MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND IS
             QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
             STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                                     <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              1,080,081
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                   217,367
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  60,519    <F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,357,967
<COMMON>                                     59,953
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                201,171
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                      156,947
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>           418,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                               50,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                     323,401
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        24,100    <F2>
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             30,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>           512,395
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          1,357,967
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>              1,147,840
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                      12,866
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             1,086,966
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>             1,099,832
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   48,008
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (2,516)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            45,492
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  24,528
<NET-INCOME>                              20,964
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                2,335
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             18,629
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  11,990
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 20,196
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                   119,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0    <F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0    <F3>
<FN>
<F1>                                  Total deferred charges includes other assets.
<F2>                                  Short-term notes includes commercial paper obligations and short-term debt
                                      to affiliates.
<F3>                                  Per share data is not relevant because the Company's common stock is
                                      wholly-owned by New England Electric System. 
</FN>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Received in Senate (RDS)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 133

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2012

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the United States Capitol for an 
  event to present the Congressional Gold Medal to Arnold Palmer, in 
 recognition of his service to the Nation in promoting excellence and 
                      good sportsmanship in golf.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL TO PRESENT 
              THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the United States Capitol is 
authorized to be used on September 12, 

              

2012, for the presentation of the Congressional Gold Medal to Arnold 
Palmer, in recognition of his service to the Nation in promoting 
excellence and good sportsmanship in golf.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 19, 2012.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
March 16, 2012 

[Name and Address of Executive]


Reference is made to the Employment
Agreement entered into on _________________ (the
“Employment Agreement”) between Photronics, Inc. (the “Company”) and
____________________ (the “Executive”). 

The Company and Executive hereby agree to
amend the Employment Agreement by (i) deleting Article 5(f) of the Employment
Agreement and (ii) deleting all references to such Article in the Employment
Agreement.

Except as amended above all other terms
and conditions of the Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect.


	Photronics,
  Inc.
	 
	By:   	   
	 
	Title:  	 
	 
	 
	Agreed to and
      Accepted            
      
	 
	[Executive]
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DOD Advisory Group of Electron Devices

AGENCY: Advisory Group on Electron Devices, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group B (Microelectronics) of the DoD Advisory Group 
on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0830, Tuesday and 0800, Wednesday 
February 3-4, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Air Force Phillips Laboratory, 
Science Center, Building 201 and Sandia National Laboratories, 
Microelectronics Development Laboratory (MDL), Building 858, 
Albuquerque, NM.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Doyle, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology; to the Director; Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E); 
and through the DDR&E, to the Director, Defense Advanced Research 
Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing 
an effective research and development program in the field of electron 
devices.
    The Working Group B meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the military proposes to initiate with 
industry, universities or in their laboratories. The microelectronics 
area includes such programs on semiconductor materials, integrated 
circuits, charge coupled devices and memories. The review will include 
classified program details throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended 
(5 U.S.C. App. Sec. 10(d)(1994)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) 
(1994), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 13, 1998.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 98-1175 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### COM. v. FLUKER, J.

1839 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/17/2017

CP-06-CR-0001609-2014 (Berks)

Affirmed
No. 12-6201.

No. 12-6425.

#### Suggs *v.*United States; and Price *v.*United States.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 681 F. 3d 411.
#### Charles E. LEWIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-2742

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Kelly P. Butz, Judge.

Affirmed.
#### COM. v. BURTON, D.

3688 EDA 2015

Superior Court of. Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

CP-51-CR-1100571-2004 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
- 1 -

State of New York

Court of Appeals

MEMORANDUM

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 58 

The People &c.,

 Respondent,

 v.

James R. McIntosh,

 Appellant.

James A. Hobbs, for appellant.

Scott Myles, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Even assuming the court erred in denying defendant’s request to submit the crimes 

of manslaughter in the second degree and criminally negligent homicide to the jury as 

lesser included offenses of the charged crimes of murder in the second degree and 
- 2 - No. 58

- 2 -

manslaughter in the first degree, the error was harmless (People v Johnson, 87 NY2d 357, 

361 [1996]; People v Boettcher, 69 NY2d 174, 180 [1987]; People v Brown, 203 NY 44, 

50-51 [1911]; People v Granger, 187 NY 67, 73 [1907]). The Appellate Division properly 

concluded that defendant’s conviction of the lesser inclusory count of first-degree 

manslaughter, which it dismissed as required by CPL 300.40 (3) (b), did not change the 

harmless error analysis. Under the circumstances presented here, the jury’s guilty verdict 

on the indictment’s highest count despite the availability of the next lesser included offense 

for their consideration, “forecloses [defendant’s] challenge to the court’s refusal to charge 

the remote lesser included offenses” (Boettcher, 69 NY2d at 180), because it dispels any 

speculation as to whether the jury might have reached a guilty verdict on “still lower 

degree[s] of homicide” (Brown, 203 NY at 50). 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, 

Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur.

Decided June 27, 2019
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        |        |        |        |        | 65,167  | 84,259  | 103,361
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 98,417  | 101,126 | 98,784 | 80,233 | 80,780 | 79,728 | 84,025 | 77,631  | 82,046  | 128,475
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 59,934  | 56,785  | 91,465 | 79,230 | 91,707 | 88,185 | 84,200 | 104,415 | 100,926 | 90,225 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 111,567 | 88,366  | 92,978 | 99,869 | 91,039 | 80,846 | 73,039 | 81,412  | 61,543  |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Wages

111,260

09/23/2015

Denied

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          84,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,754,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,324,215
<INVENTORY>                                  7,686,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,744,437
<PP&E>                                       9,962,434
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,421,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,008,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,710,295
<BONDS>                                      4,744,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,046,949
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,688,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,008,425
<SALES>                                     19,966,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,966,547
<CGS>                                        5,662,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,442,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             256,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,278,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                   865,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,413,185
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-145251 on Form S-3, No. 333-131900 on Form S-8, No. 333-152141 on Form S-8 and No. 333-162134 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 7, 2011 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Hughes Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Hughes Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Hughes Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 7,2011