alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alex Nance, Appellant.

[770 NYS2d 524]—

*1474Appeal from, a judgment of Erie County Court (DiTullio, J.), entered March 14, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter aha, murder in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1], [3]) and one count each of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [1]) and intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree (§ 215.15 [1]). The verdict is not against the weight of the evidence on the issue of defendant’s identity as one of the perpetrators (see *People v Goree,*309 AD2d 1204 [2003]; *People v Quinney,*305 AD2d 1044 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 586 [2003]; *People v Owens,*275 AD2d 905, 906 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 937 [2000]; see *generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), nor is it against the weight of the evidence on the issues whether defendant stole the victim’s money and intimidated a witness by threatening her with bodily harm (see *generally Bleakley,*69 NY2d at 495).

Although County Court was without authority to allow two television stations to videotape or broadcast the trial (see *Matter of Santiago v Bristol,*273 AD2d 813, 814 [2000], *appeal dismissed*95 NY2d 847 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 848 [2000]; see *also*Civil Rights Law § 52; 22 NYCRR 29.1 [a]), we cannot conclude that defendant was thereby deprived of a fair trial absent a showing of actual prejudice (see *Chandler v Florida,*449 US 560, 581-582 [1981]; see *also People v Burdo,*256 AD2d 737, 738-739 [1998]). Defendant has failed “to show that the media’s coverage of his case . . . compromised the ability of the jury to judge him fairly” or “had an adverse impact on the trial participants sufficient to constitute a denial of due process” *(Chandler,*449 US at 581).

There is no merit to defendant’s contention concerning an alleged *Rosario*violation with respect to the prior statement of a witness *(see*CPL 240.45 [1] [a]). There is no evidence that the trial prosecutor ever had possession or control of the witness’s prior statement, which had been given to a private investigator and an attorney for a third party *(see generally People v Kelly,*88 NY2d 248, 251-252 [1996]).

Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel. The evidence, the law and the circumstances of this case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, establish that defendant received meaningful representation *(see generally*
      *1475
      *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *People v Davis,*307 AD2d 722, 723 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 619 [2003]).

The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We have reviewed the contentions raised in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Wisner, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Companys Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 7241)

I, Tom L. Ward, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012
of SandRidge Energy, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ Tom L. WardTom L. WardChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board


Date: April 30, 2013
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|New Jersey Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|New Jersey Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 200,387 | 206,261 | 212,496
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 217,548 | 215,408 | 212,726 | 215,948 | 219,061 | 222,632 | 224,749 | 226,714 | 234,459 | 232,831
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 243,541 | 212,726 | 214,526 | 223,564 | 223,595 | 226,007 | 227,819 | 230,855 | 229,235 | 234,125
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 234,158 | 234,721 | 237,602 | 236,746 | 240,083 | 241,417 | 242,788 | 244,910 | 246,103 | 246,963
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 247,736 | 249,225 | 250,345 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1997 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,002,504
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     154,321
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,203,623
<CASH>                                           6,291
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          50,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,470,644
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                348,976
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            281,434
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,568
<OTHER-SE>                                     612,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,470,644
<PREMIUMS>                                     235,579
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             20,323
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 509
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,305
<BENEFITS>                                     158,024
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     50,502
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             8,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 39,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,052
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Corey GREGG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1735

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000266

05-JUL-2013

08:09 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 22, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don E.
Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Don E. Marsh
--------------------------------
Don E. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2002
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, Joshua Schanzer, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10–K of TILES Trust No. 2006-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, allof the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) assuccessor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association (“BANA”), ofTILES Trust No. 2006-1, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to TILES Trust No. 2006-1; and

 

5.        All of the reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliancewith servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of RegulationAB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Any material instancesof noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bankas successor-in-interest to BANA and its officers and agents.

 

 

 

By:	/s/Joshua Schanzer	

Name:	JoshuaSchanzer
455P16

#### State v. William Sheldon Howell

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-303)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 12/20/2016

2.
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 33,565 | 34,048
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 40,331 | 35,275 | 34,591 | 34,830 | 34,556 | 36,165 | 34,283 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 33,258 | 33,228 | 33,257 | 33,466 | 33,574 | 33,718 | 33,827 | 34,070 | 34,187 | 34,209
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34,460 | 34,545 | 34,037 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1353. ROBERT DAVIS et al. v. CKA AUTO SALES, LLC.

The magistrate court entered a judgment in favor of plaintiffsRobert and Kathy

Davis, and defendant CKA Auto Sales, LLC appealed to the superior court. The

superior court entered a judgment denying the plaintiffs’ claims, and the plaintiffs

filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

“Appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower

courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary

appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (punctuation

omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Because the plaintiffs did not follow the

proper procedure for requesting appellate review in this case, we lack jurisdiction,

and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 05, 2021

05/05/2021
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Annual Report of Towerstream Corporation, (the ‘‘Company’’)
on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I,
Jeffrey M. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:
  (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
April 29, 2010





/s/
      Jeffrey M. ThompsonJeffrey
      M. Thompson
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
#### ADOPTION OF: K.O.K, minor Appeal of: I.K.S. et al.

1451 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/14/2017

No. 14 O.C. of 2016

(Greene)

Affirmed
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Dawn Hammond, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2006-1 (the "Exchange Act
     periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Bank of America, National Association, as Servicer, Chevy Chase Bank,
     F.S.B., as Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer,
     Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc., as Sub-Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation, as
     Servicer, EverHome Mortgage Company, as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a
     GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding,
     Inc., as Servicer, Harborside Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HomeBanc
     Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, HSBC Mortgage Corporation, USA, as
     Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as Servicer, Mellon Trust of New England,
     National Association, as Named Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation, as
     Servicer, U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, as Servicer, Washington Mutual Bank,
     as Servicer and Waterfield Mortgage Company, Incorporated, as Servicer.


     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ Dawn Hammond
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
     servicer)
AURORA LOAN SERVICES
    A LEHMAN BROTHERS COMPANY


Depositor:  Structured Asset Securities Corporation
            745 Seventh Avenue, 8th Floor
            New York, NY 10019


Trustee:      Citibank, N.A.
              388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor
              New York, NY 10013
              Attention Citibank Agency & Trust

Securities Administrator:


Subject:   Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:   2006
Securitization:   LXS 2006-1

I, E. Todd Whittemore, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora
Loan Services LLC (the "Master Servicer"), do certify the following for the
Calendar Year 2006:

1.    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year (or portion thereof) and of its performance under the Agreement
for such period has been made under my supervision.

2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
aspects throughout 2006 (or applicable portion thereof), or, if there has been
a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, I have
specifically identified to the Depositor, and the Trustee each such failure
known to me and the nature and status thereof, including the steps being taken
by the Master Servicer to remedy such default.

                          Certified by:   AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC




                                          By:/S/ Todd Whittemore
                                             -------------------------
                                          Name:  E. Todd Whittemore
                                          Title: Executive Vice President