alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63799-63800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Proposed Extension of Approval of Information Collection; Comment 
Request--Electrically Operated Toys and Children's Articles

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requested 
comments on a proposed extension of approval, for a period of 3 years 
from the date of approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 
of a collection of information from manufacturers and importers of 
certain electrically operated toys and children's articles. The 
collection of information consists of testing and recordkeeping 
requirements in regulations titled, ``Requirements for Electrically 
Operated Toys or Other Electrically Operated Articles Intended for Use 
by Children,'' codified at 16 CFR part 1505.
    This document was published in the Federal Register of October 4, 
2012, and contains an incorrect docket number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West

[[Page 63800]]

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504-7815, or by email to: 
rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

Correction

    (1) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60685, in the 
second column, correct the docket number in the heading to read: 
[Docket No. CPSC-2012-0057];
    (2) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60685, in the 
third column, correct the first sentence of the ADDRESSES section to 
read: ``You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2012-
0057, by any of the following methods:''

    Dated: October 12, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-25523 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00486

- CV

Elgin TRACY , Adolph Tracy, and Travis Morgan,

Appellants

v.

Edward W. CHAMRAD Jr.,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 05

- 0240

- CVW

Honorable Russell H. Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of

this appeal are taxed against Appellants Elg in Tracy, Adolph Tracy, and Travis Morgan.

SIGNED September 16, 2015.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
No. 12-6527.

#### Baker *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

128913 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. NORMA R. BIERLEIN, Next Friend of Stephen J. Markman, SAMANTHA C. BIERLE IN, a Minor, and Justices KIRT BIERLEIN, Conservator for SAMANTHA C. BIERLEIN, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 128913 COA: 259519 Saginaw CC: 96-013292-NI MARK SCHNEIDER a nd MARY SCHNEIDER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the May 12, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other perempt ory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall file supplemen tal briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, addressing whether, when no conservator had been appoi nted, and no bond had been approved by or filed with the probate cour t, (1) the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction to approve the se ttlement and enter an order of dismissal; or (2) any other reason justifying relief from the op eration of the judgment in th is case exists; or (3) as a prophylactic measure, in the exercise of this Court’s inh erent power to enforce its own rules pursuant to MCR 7.316(A)(7), the dismis sal in this case ought to be set aside and the settlement reopened.

p1221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2005

Clerk
#### State v. Jackson

106,461

09/04/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
exhibit_4-5.htm










Exhibit 4.5


 




Amendment No. 1 to Management Services Agreement, dated June 28, 2011, among the Registrant, Del-Ta


Engineering Ltd. and Kardan Communications Ltd. (translated from Hebrew)




 


Entered and executed on the 28th day of June, 2011


 


B   E   T   W   E   E   N


 



	
RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd.

	  
	
Reg. No. 510896293

	  
	
(the "Company")

	
On the One Side;












A           N           D


 







 



	
Del-Ta Engineering Equipment Ltd.

	  
	
Reg. No. 510463482

	  
	
("Delta")

	
On the Second Side;












A           N           D




 



	
Kardan Communications Ltd.

	  
	
Reg. No. 512051590

	  
	
("Kardan")

	
On the Third Side;







 



	
WHEREAS

	
The Parties signed a Management Services Agreement on October 5, 2006 (the "Services Agreement"), according to which Delta and Kardan provide the Company, from time to time, and according to its needs with different services as set forth in the Services Agreement; and







 




	
WHEREAS

	The parties wish to amend the Services Agreement, as set forth below.







 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
The Parties agree and confirm that Section 6 of the Services Agreement, in its original language shall be deleted entirely and replaced with the following:







 


"6. This Agreement is effective starting 1.1.2007, and shall remain in effect until 28.6.2014, but Delta and Kardan shall be entitled by mutual notice, and the Company shall be entitled by notice to Delta and Kardan, to terminate this Agreement at any time with a 30 days' prior notice. For the avoidance of any doubt, it is herein clarified that Delta shall not be entitled to terminate and/or change the Agreement without Kardan's approval, and Kardan shall not be entitled to terminate and/or change this Agreement without Delta's approval."


 




  





  











  






 



	
  

	
2.

	
For the avoidance of any doubt, it is herein clarified that this amendment shall not affect and/or derogate from any of the Parties' obligations in the Services Agreement and/or any other agreement between the Parties.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have duly signed this Amendment:


 


/S/ RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd.


_____________________________________


RRsat Global Communications Network Ltd.


 



/S/ Del-Ta Engineering Equipment Ltd.




_____________________________________


Del-Ta Engineering Equipment Ltd.


 



/S/ Kardan Communications Ltd.




_____________________________________


Kardan Communications Ltd.


 


- 2 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000064500
<NAME> SKLAR CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                        14,486
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,514,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                  54,492
<INVENTORY>                                2,819,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,328,180
<PP&E>                                       843,163
<DEPRECIATION>                               398,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5,998,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      3,411,573
<BONDS>                                      523,422
<COMMON>                                     123,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                      248
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,806,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5,998,033
<SALES>                                    7,074,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           7,074,783
<CGS>                                      3,779,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              6,788,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           233,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               52,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                  10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           42,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  42,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.15)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11817]



[[Page 24779]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-193-000]


Shell Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

April 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 24, 1998, Shell Gas Pipeline Company 
(SGPC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, First Revised Tariff Sheet Nos. 245, 256, 267, 293, 294, 
304 and 318, to become effective May 24, 1998.
    SGPC states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect an 
address and telephone change for the corporate office of SGPC.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11817 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Poul Wesley SPRADLING, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-3090

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2017

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel — Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.
004P17

#### State v. Leonard Paul Schalow

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-330)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 01/6/2017

2. Allowed

3. Allowed
#### James COLLINS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-2921

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 24, 2017

Petition for Writ of Prohibition — Original Jurisdiction.

Denied.
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas Net Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas Net Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | -1     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
less than 79 feet in length. These draft general permits authorize discharges into the waters of the 

State of Missouri. 

This office certifies that the proposed project will not cause the general or the numeric criteria to be 

exceeded nor impair beneficial uses established in the Water Quality Standards, 10 CSR 20-7.031, 

provided the following conditions are met: 

1. The permittee shall not cause or contribute to the general or numeric criteria to be exceeded 

nor impair beneficial uses established in the Water Quality Standards, 10 CSR 20-7.031. 

2. Representatives from the Department shall be allowed to inspect the authorized activity at 

any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance 

with the letters and conditions of the permit. 

3. This certification shall not be construed or interpreted to imply the requirements for other 

permits are replaced or superceded. Any National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 

Permits, Land Disturbance General Permits, or other requirements shall be complied with. 

You may appeal to have the matter heard by the Administrative Hearing Commission. To appeal, 

you must file a petition with th~ Administrative Hearing Commission within thirty (30) days after 

the date this decision was mailed or the date it was delivered, whichever date was earlier. If any 

0 

R<cyded Paper 
, p

Mr. Alan Leary, Missouri Department of Conservation 

Ms. Janet Sternburg, Missouri Department of Conservation 

Ms. Jennifer Campbell-Allison, Missouri Department of Conservation 

Mr. Stuart Miller, Missouri Department of Conservation 

Mr. Doug Berka, Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District 

Mr. Keith McMullen, Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis District 

Mr. Gregg Williams, Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District 

Mr. Ward Lenz, Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District 

Ms. Shelly Carter, Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District, MO State Reg. Office 

Mr. Mel Stanford, Army Corps of Engineers, Kansas City District, Truman Satellite Office 

Ms. Sarah Chitwood, Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District 

Ms. Elaine M. Edwards, Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District 

Ms. Vicky Johnson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mr. Rick Hansen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 

Ms. Dorothy Franklin, Department of Natural Resources, Kansas City Regional Office 

Mr. Jimmy Coles, Department of Natural Resources, Kansas City Regional Office 

Mr. Joe Bowdish, Department of Natural Resources, Northeast Regional Office 

Mr. Bradley Ledbetter, Department of Natural Resources, Southeast Regional Office 

Mr. Kevin Vanover, Department of Natural Resources, Southeast Regional Office 

Ms. Donna Riebeling, Department of Natural Resources, St. Louis Regional Office 

Ms. Tina White, Department of Natural Resources, Southwest Regional Office
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11330]



[[Page 23472]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P]


Notice for Publication; F-14840-B, F-14840-D2, F-14840-E2, F-
14840-F2, F-14840-G2 and F-14840-I2; Alaska Native Claims Selections

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Section 14(a) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(a), will be issued to 
Tihteet' Aii, Inc. The lands involved are in the vicinity of Birch 
Creek, Alaska, within Tps. 15 N., Rs. 8 and 10 E.; Tps. 16 N., Rs. 9 
and 11 E.; and Tps. 17 N., Rs. 8 and 10 E., Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska.
    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government, or regional 
corporation, shall have until May 29, 1998 to file an appeal. However, 
parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days from the 
date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in the Bureau 
of Land Management at the address identified above, where the 
requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do not 
file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, 
Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Elizabeth Sherwood,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 98-11330 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-U
|  Definitions, Sources and Explanatory Notes |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|  Category:   | Natural Gas Production      |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                             |
|  Topic:      | Lease Condensate Production |
|                         |
|-------------------------|
|   Definitions |  |
|                         |
| Key Terms                    | Definition                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Lease Condensate             | A mixture consisting primarily of pentanes and heavier hydrocarbons which is recovered as a liquid from natural gas in lease separation facilities. This category excludes natural gas plant liquids, such as butane and propane, which are recovered at downstream natural gas processing plants or facilities. |
| Production, Lease Condensate | The volume of lease condensate produced during the report year. Leasecondensate volumes include only those volumes recovered from lease or field separation facilities.                                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| For definitions of related energy terms, refer to the   EIA Energy Glossary. |
|  	Sources |
|-----------------|
|  |
|--|
|  | Form EIA-23L, "Annual Report of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves (County Level Version)".    Natural Gas Survey Forms and Instructions
 	Explanatory Notes
  Related data and background information are published in the      U.S. Crude Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves Annual Report. |
#### COM. v. SHARP, W.

1877 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/21/2017

CP-22-CR-0002383-2016, CP-22-CR-0002530-2016 (Dauphin)

Remanded Jurisdiction Retained
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 65 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to prohibit 

candidates for election to Congress from accepting contributions from 

individuals who do not reside in the State or Congressional district 

the candidate seeks to represent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2011 

Mr. BOREN introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to prohibit candidates for election to Congress 

from accepting contributions from individuals who do 

not reside in the State or Congressional district the 

candidate seeks to represent. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 65 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. A candidate for election for the office 

5 of Senator may not accept contributions, including funds 

6 and in-kind equivalents, from individuals who do not re7 side in the State the candidate seeks to represent. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. A candidate for election for the office 

9 of Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis10 sioner to, the Congress may not accept contributions, in11 cluding funds and in-kind equivalents, from individuals 

12 who do not reside in the Congressional district the can13 didate seeks to represent. 

14 ‘‘SECTION 3. Congress shall have power to implement 

15 and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS