alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 78 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 78

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2011

  Ms. Edwards (for herself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the following 
 joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
   clarify the authority of Congress and the States to regulate the 
      expenditure of funds for political activity by corporations.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Nothing in this Constitution shall prohibit Congress 
and the States from imposing content-neutral regulations and 
restrictions on the expenditure of funds for political activity by any 
corporation, limited liability company, or other corporate entity, 
including but not limited to contributions in support of, or in 
opposition to, a candidate for public office.
    ``Section 2. Nothing contained in this Article shall be construed 
to abridge the freedom of the press.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-6739.

#### Burkhardt *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### COM. v. DAVIS, C.

1677 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/08/2017

CP-38-CR-0000270-2013

(Lebanon)

Vacated/Remanded
EXHIBIT (11.1)


THE MEAD CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
--------------------------------------------------
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(All amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                     First Quarter Ended    
                                                     --------------------   
                                                     March 30,   March 31,  
                                                       1997        1996     
                                                     -------      -------    
                                                                             
NET EARNINGS APPLICABLE TO COMMON AND COMMON                                 
 EQUIVALENT SHARES                                  $ 20,177     $ 36,346    
                                                     =======      =======    
                                                                             
                                                                             
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT                               
 SHARES OUTSTANDING:                                                         
  Average number of common shares outstanding         52,217       52,779    
                                                                             
  Dilutive effect of stock options after                                     
   application of treasury stock method                  827          693    
                                                     -------      -------    
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND COMMON                                          
 EQUIVALENT SHARES OUTSTANDING                        53,044       53,472    
                                                     =======      =======    
PRIMARY NET EARNINGS PER COMMON AND COMMON                                   
 EQUIVALENT SHARE                                   $    .38     $    .68    
                                                     =======      =======
#### Charles BLOOMGARDEN, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. Roberta G. MANDEL, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D16-0435

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 26, 2017

L.T. NO.: 07-17098

Denied.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00048

- CR

RONALD TYRONE PACE, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 41560

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ronald Tyrone Pace, appellant, filed a notice of appeal March 22, 2013, from his

conviction of assault. Pace also filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court subsequently

granted. As a result of the favorable ruling on his motion for a new trial, Pace now seeks to

dismiss his pending appeal

.

The trial court’s grant of “a new trial restores the case to its position before the former

trial . . . .” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 21.9(b). Because there is no conviction from which to appeal, we

have no jurisdiction to consider Pace’s appeal. See Waller v. State , 931 S.W.2d 640, 643

– 44

(Tex. App.

— Dallas 1996, no pet.).

Consequently, Pace’s motion to dismiss is granted, and we dismiss this appeal for want of

jurisdiction.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 13 , 2013

Date Decided: May 14

, 2013

Do Not Publish
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicataand collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### FEB 21 2002 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
CAINEY ROBERTS, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,
v. CHARLES RAY, Warden; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents-Appellees. No. 00-7117 (E.D. Okla.) (D.Ct. No. 97-CV-500-B)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Circuit Judge, BRORBY , Senior Circuit Judge, and LUCERO , Circuit Judge.
Mr. Cainey Roberts, Jr. appeals the district court’ s denial of his federal petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 129 1 and 2253. Mr. Roberts claims he is entitled to habeas relief because the Oklahoma Court of Criminal1 Parker v. State , 917 P.2d 980, 985-86 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996) (defective

criminal information raises due process concerns, but is not fatal to jurisdiction), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 1096 (1997), overruled Miller v. State , 827 P.2d 875, 879 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992) (criminal information must specifically allege each element of the crime to confer jurisdiction on the trial court).

2Contrary to the contentions in Mr. Roberts’ brief, the state appellate court did not apply Parkerin his direct appeal. Roberts v. State , No. F-93-482, slip op. at 3-4 (Okla. Crim. App. May 1, 1996) (unpublished opinion). Rather, the court relied on an unpublished opinion, Masquat v. State , No. F-93-1369 (Okla. Crim. App. July 26, 1996). Masquat held “[t]he term ‘premeditated design’ ... was sufficient in this Information to set forth the element of malice aforethought.” Id. at 4. Obviously, the result in Masquat does not bode well for Mr. Roberts and may explain his decision to submit an ex post facto argument to this court. Nevertheless, we acknowledge Mr. Roberts’ reliance on Parker in his ex post facto argument before this court and dispose of his claim accordingly.

3 Sallahdinwas decided after we heard oral argument in this case.
-2- Appeals violated ex post facto principles when it applied Parker v. State 1 to his direct appeal. Mr. Roberts argues Parker was an unexpected and unforeseeable new rule of law and the application of Parker in his direct appeal 2 denied him due process of law.
Mr. Roberts acknowledges his argument hinges on whe ther this court determines Parker was unforeseeable. This court recently held the r esult in Parker was foreseeable. Sallahdin v. Gibson, 275 F.3d 1211, 1228 (10th Cir. 2002)

. 3 Mr. Roberts’ arguments are substantially the same as those we considered-3-

and rejected in Sallahdin
. See id. at 1227-28. Therefore, the district court’s denial of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED
.
Entered by the Court: WADE BRORBY United States Circuit Judge
wfxpextltr.htm






  





  











  








Exhibit 10.22

















July 28, 2011







Via Electronic Mail







Mr. Dennis Thatcher


Chief Operating Officer


Mission Broadcasting, Inc.


30400 Detroit Road


Suite 304


Westlake, OH 44145-1855







Re:  WFXP Time Brokerage Agreement







Dear Dennis:







Pursuant to Paragraph 1 of the Amendment to Time Brokerage Agreement dated as of July 17, 2006 between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. and Mission Broadcasting, Inc., this letter is to notify you that Nexstar hereby elects to extend the Time Brokerage Agreement through August 16, 2016.







Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this extension of the TBA.








	
Sincerely,


	  
	  
	
/s/ Elizabeth Ryder


	
Elizabeth Ryder


	
Vice President & General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 70 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.70
                                        Agreed to August 2, 2011        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That in the enrollment of S. 365, the Secretary of the Senate shall 
amend the title so as to read: ``An Act to provide for budget 
control.''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Lease and Plant Fuel Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2,270  | 1,530  | 1,924 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 2,251  | 2,419  | 2,847  | 2,725  | 1,649  | 1,760  | 3,043  | 3,210  | 2,134  | 2,889 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,320  | 1,580  | 3,278  | 3,543  | 5,236  | 4,575  | 4,715  | 5,799  | 4,983  | 4,767 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 6,031  | 3,502  | 3,381  | 4,145  | 3,252  | 3,069  | 3,299  | 2,275  | 1,706  |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies; Correction

    This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 98-10365) published on pages 
19493 and 19494 of the issue for Monday, April 20, 1998.
    Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston heading, the entry for New 
England Community Bancor, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut, is revised to 
read as follows:
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. New England Community Bancorp, Inc., Windsor, Connecticut; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Olde Port Bank & Trust 
Company, Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
    Comments on this application must be received by May 15, 1998.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 21, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-10994 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morton Industrial Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 27, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Rodney B. Harrison, Vice President of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Rodney B. Harrison Rodney B. Harrison
Vice President of Finance
May 11, 2004 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11846]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Meeting

April 29, 1998.
    Take notice that on May 28-29, 1998, the Commercial Practices 
Working Group (CPWG), will conduct its monthly meeting at the 
Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 
The CPWG is a voluntary industry group with a diverse membership that 
has made recommendations to the Commission on the Open Access Same-time 
Information System (OASIS) and related matters. It is expected that the 
CPWG will discuss OASIS and reliability-related issues at the meetings. 
The meetings will be open to interested participants and the public.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11846 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO RULE 13A  14(B) OF THE OF THE
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  Form 10-K/A Rule 13a-14(b)
      
  Mihael H. Polymeropoulos
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
    A signed original of this written statement required by
    Rule 13a-14(b)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
    Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will
    be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities
    and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  This certification accompanies the
    Form 10-K/A
    to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
    Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference
    into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
    1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before
    or after the date of the
    Form 10-K/A),
    irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
    such filing.
Kopin Corporation Fiscal Year 2012 Incentive Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.18 
 Kopin Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan 
 On February 21, 2012, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the Company’s 2012 Incentive Plan effective as of January 1, 2012. The Company’s 2012 Incentive Plan acts as an incentive plan for the Company’s fiscal
year ending December 29, 2012. Pursuant to this 2012 Incentive Plan, certain officers and employees of the Company are eligible to earn incentive compensation if the Company achieves certain financial milestones (the “Financial
Milestones”), based on the 2012 Plan Budget, as adopted by the Company’s Compensation Committee. The purpose of the 2012 Incentive Plan is to further align the interest of management and shareholders by providing employees higher levels of
compensation for meeting or exceeding the Financial Milestones. The 2012 Incentive Plan provides a cash bonus if the minimum Financial Milestones are achieved and additional incremental cash bonus amounts for results that exceed the minimum
Financial Milestones. The incentive compensation may be earned if the product line a participant works for meets its respective financial milestone even if the other product lines of the Company do not meet their respective financial milestones.
Drs. Fan and Choi and Mr. Sneider will earn 50% of their incentive compensation based on the results of the Display product line and 50% upon the results of the III-V product line. 

The table below provides the potential range of awards that the Officers may be eligible to earn under the 2012 Incentive Plan. The table
does not include amounts that will be paid as part of the Officer’s annual salary, amounts that may be earned under previous equity awards or any additional awards the Compensation Committee may grant. 

 

									
	 Officer
	  	Cash
Bonus (a)	 	  	Cash Bonus
Maximum (b)	 
	 Dr. Fan
	  	$	100,000	  	  	$	328,000	  
	 Mr. Sneider
	  	$	30,000	  	  	$	135,000	  
	 Dr. Tsaur
	  	$	30,000	  	  	$	151,000	  
	 Dr. Choi
	  	$	30,000	  	  	$	104,000	  
	 Mr. Hill
	  	$	30,000	  	  	$	122,000	  
	 Mr. Presz
	  	$	30,000	  	  	$	107,000	  

  

	(a)	Cash bonus if the minimum Financial Milestones are achieved. 

  

	(b)	Maximum cash bonus if all Financial Milestones are achieved.
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|North Dakota Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|North Dakota Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 6,238  | 6,656  | 9,004  | 6,708  | 5,800  | 5,102 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 5,393  | 4,447  | 508    | 532    | 358    | 93     | 358    | 161    | 57     | 78    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 73     | 89     | 139    | 123    | 126    | 87     | 53     | 42     | 9,044  | 6,244 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,448  | 10,271 | 6,762  | 7,221  | 7,008  | 6,708  | 6,807  | 6,047  | 5,764  | 4,986 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024