alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.3
                  SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC
              RALI SERIES 2006-QA1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under  the   applicable   servicing   agreement  has  been  made  under  my
     supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing  agreement
     in all material respects throughout such period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      ------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
#### John Ellis HOLMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D16-292

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 9, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.1 -  Independent Accountant's Servicing Report for the year
                ended December 31, 2005



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS [logo]

					PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
					101 East Kennedy Boulevard
					Suite 1500
					Tampa FL 33602-5147
					Telephone (813) 229 0221
					Facsimile (813) 229 3646




    Report of Independent Certified Public Accounting Firm on
            Uniform Single Attestation Program


To the Board of Directors of Walter Industries, Inc.:



We have examined management's assertion about Mid-State Homes, Inc.
(the "Company"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Walter Industries, Inc.,
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying management assertion
(see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 27, 2006
|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History:                                          
|                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       
|                                                       
|Alaska Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 60,804 | 74,294 | 61,869
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 73,225 | 39,422 | 53,974 | 23,492 | 29,563 | 38,770 | 14,529 | 11,210 | 6,947  | -1,355
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10,021 | 17,185 | 22,663 | 22,590 | 20,531 | 23,182 | 23,642 | 26,227 | 34,533 | 35,026
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 57,354 | 66,360 | 97,661 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-5341.

#### Clements *v.*Alabama State Bar.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rehabilicare Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan W.
Gladney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                          /s/ Dan W. Gladney
                                          ----------------------
                                          Dan W. Gladney
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          November 14, 2002
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

Independent Accountants’ Review Report

 

The Board of Directors 

Mercury GeneralCorporation: 

 

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of MercuryGeneral Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and the cash flows for the three-month period ended, March 31, 2004 and 2003. These consolidated financial statementsare the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted ourreviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsiblefor financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements takenas a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on ourreviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity andcash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 2, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

May 3, 2004
Docket No. FAA-2013-0096
ADSK - 01.31.2012 EX 10.37






Exhibit 10.37


EXHIBIT A
AMENDMENT TO THE
AUTODESK, INC. EQUITY INCENTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN
This amendment (the "Amendment") to the Autodesk, Inc. Equity Incentive Deferral Plan (the "Plan"), is made and entered into effective as of February 17, 2012.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Autodesk, Inc. desires to amend the Plan;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:
1.    Amendment to Preamble
The final two sentences of the second paragraph of the preamble to the Plan are hereby amended to read as follows:
Any Restricted Stock Units (or RSUs) awarded pursuant to the Deferral Plan shall be granted under the Company's 2008 Employee Stock Plan, 2012 Employee Stock Plan, or any other equity compensation plan approved by the Company's Stockholders (the plan covering any given RSU being referred to herein as the "Plan" with respect to such RSU).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in the Deferral Plan shall have the meanings given to them in the Plan.
2.    Effect on the Plan.  Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
3.    Headings.  Headings to sections herein are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to be a part of or to affect the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment. 
4.    Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of California without regard to its principles of conflict of laws.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment be executed as of the date first above written.
COMPANY


By:         /s/   RICHARD FOEHR            
Name:    Richard Foehr
Title:    Vice President, Assistant General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary
**Exhibit99.7**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Canetic Resources Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for theyear ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Broshko, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Canetic Resources Inc., whoperforms the same function for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/ David J. Broshko*                     | * * |
|--------------------------------------------|----------|
| David J. Broshko                           |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| of Canetic Resources Inc.                  |
|                                       |
| March 28, 2007                             |

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Commodity Credit Corporation


Uniform Grain and Rice Storage Agreement Fees

AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of fees.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to publish a schedule of fees to 
be paid to Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) by grain and rice 
warehouse operators requesting to enter into a storage agreement; 
increase the capacity of an existing storage agreement; or renew an 
existing storage agreement.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Froehlich, Chief, Storage 
Contract Branch, Warehouse and Inventory Division, Farm Service Agency, 
United States Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, 
S.W., STOP 0553, Washington, D.C. 20250-0553, telephone (202) 720-7398, 
FAX (202) 690-3123.
    In accordance with the provisions of the Commodity Credit 
Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et seq), CCC enters into storage 
agreements with private grain and rice warehouse operators to provide 
for the storage of commodities owned by CCC or pledged as security to 
CCC for marketing assistance and price support loans.
    Specifically, 7 CFR 1421.5558 provides that all grain and rice 
warehouse operators who do not have an existing agreement with CCC for 
storage and handling of CCC-owned commodities or commodities pledged to 
CCC as loan collateral, but who desire such an agreement, must pay an 
application and examination fee for each warehouse for which CCC 
approval is sought prior to CCC conducting the original warehouse 
examination.
    A review of the revenue collected for application and examination 
fees indicates that the fees collected are insufficient to meet costs 
incurred by CCC for warehouse examinations and contract origination 
administrative functions. Accordingly, beginning April 1 with the start 
of the 1998-99 contract year, the fees are changed by increasing by 10 
percent those fees applicable to the 1997-98 contract year. The fee 
will be computed at the rate of $15 for each 10,000 bushels of storage 
capacity or fraction thereof, but the fee will be not less than $150 
nor more than $1,500.
    Further, each warehouse operator who has a non-federally licensed 
grain or rice warehouse in States that do not have a cooperative 
agreement with CCC for warehouse examinations must pay an annual fee to 
CCC for each such warehouse which is approved by CCC or for which CCC 
approval is sought. The collection of the annual fee by CCC is 
currently suspended. CCC continues to suspend collection of the annual 
fee, but CCC may reinstate the annual fee by future notice to the 
industry.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on April 27, 1998.
Keith Kelly,
Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 98-11695 Filed 5-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
EXHIBIT 35.1
            SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                 RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC
        RALI SERIES 2006-QS1 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
January 1, 2006,  and the  Standard  Terms of Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of January 1, 2006 (as  amended  from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),
among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company,
LLC (formerly Residential Funding Corporation), as master servicer, and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the  period  covered by the
     Issuing  Entity's  report  on Form 10-K and of the  Servicer's  performance
     under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2.   To the  best of my  knowledge,  based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has
     fulfilled  all of its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in all  material
     respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th
day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Managing Director
482P13-2

#### State v. Carl Lynn Williams

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP16-323)

Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 46 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' 
              MEMORIAL SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution

              

 referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public 
event, the 30th Annual National Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in 
this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, 
in order to honor the law enforcement officers who died in the line of 
duty during 2010.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2011, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.
```
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Michigan Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Michigan Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7,642  | 2,330  | 1,719 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 378    | 788    |        |        | 63     | 176    | 327    | 981    | 1,401  | 2,169 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 2,375  | 2,390  | 2,400  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,606  | 2,340  | 2,768 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Docket No. FAA-2014-0424
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-192111) pertaining to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2004 Stock Plan, the SignNow, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, and the Purewire, Inc. 2008 Stock Incentive Plan of Barracuda Networks, Inc.,


(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-196718) pertaining to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Barracuda Networks, Inc.,


(3) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-201475) and related Prospectus of Barracuda Networks, Inc. for the registration of shares of its common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants, debt securities, and units, and


(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-206689) pertaining to the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Barracuda Networks, Inc.;





of our report dated May 3, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Barracuda Networks, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Barracuda Networks, Inc. for the year ended February 29, 2016.








/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





San Jose, California


May 3, 2016
#### COM. v. WILLIAMS, G.

1417 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

CP-51-CR-0006521-2008

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
448P16

#### State v. Timothy Devon King

Defs *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-261)

Denied