alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1046 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize a member of the Armed 

Forces to designate anyone as the person authorized to direct disposition 

of the remains of the member if the member dies while on active duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2011 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Ms. MOORE, Mr. ROGERS of Michigan, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, and Ms. RICHARDSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize a member of the Armed Forces to designate anyone as the 

person authorized to direct disposition of the remains 

of the member if the member dies while on active duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor the Written 

5 Intent of our Soldier Heroes Act’’ or ‘‘Honor the WISH 

6 Act’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1046 IH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PERSONS AUTHORIZED TO DI2 RECT DISPOSITION OF REMAINS OF MEM3 BERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

4 Section 1482(c) of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘Only the’’ in the matter pre7 ceding paragraph (1) and inserting ‘‘The’’; 

8 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

9 (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively; 

10 (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by 

11 striking ‘‘clauses (1)-(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraphs 

12 (1) through (4)’’; and 

13 (4) by inserting before paragraph (2), as so re14 designated, the following new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(1) The person identified by the decedent on 

16 the record of emergency data maintained by the Sec17 retary concerned (DD Form 93 or any successor to 

18 that form), as the Person Authorized to Direct Dis19 position (PADD), regardless of the relationship of 

20 the designee to the decedent.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)       
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History: Annual                                 
|View History:                                        
|                                                     
|Ohio Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Ohio Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2   | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | -------- | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | --------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |        |          |        |         |        |         | -39,324 | -44,871 | -104,348
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7,861   | 6,051  | -186     | -3,160 | -67,071 | -2,244 | -23,831 | -70,221 | -57,457 | -65,751 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -69,213 | 62,091 | -55,286  | 3,638  | -61,306 | 99,655 | 71,121  | 158,057 | -41,184 | -129,060
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 42,271  | 20,326 | -189,350 |        |         |        |         |         |         |         
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 15, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2198

Lower Tribunal No. 16-3753

________________

MVW Management, LLC,

Appellant,

vs.

Regalia Beach Developers LLC, etc., et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.

Leon Cosgrove, LLC, and Scott B. Cosgrove and Ellen Ross Belfer;

McDermott Will & Emery LLP, and Marcos D. Jimenez, for appellant.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP, and Michael N. Kreitzer and

James J. Ward, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
We adopt the well-reasoned analysis outlined by the trial court in the record

below and affirm the ruling that MVW Management, LLC is not entitled to

advancement of its costs and attorney’s fees under either the operating agreement

or management agreement.

Affirmed.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 102 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 102

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2012

    Mr. Chabot introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 
                                States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for a year shall not exceed the average 
annual revenue collected in the three prior years, adjusted in 
proportion to changes in population and inflation. Total outlays shall 
include all outlays of the United States except those for payment of 
debt, and revenue shall include all revenue of the United States except 
that derived from borrowing.
    ``Section 2. Two-thirds of each House of Congress may by roll call 
vote declare an emergency and provide by law for specific outlays in 
excess of the limit in section 1. The declaration shall specify reasons 
for the emergency designation and shall limit the period in which 
outlays may exceed the limit in section 1 to no longer than one year.
    ``Section 3. All revenue in excess of outlays shall reduce the debt 
of the United States. Upon the retirement of such debt, revenue in 
excess of outlays shall be held by the Treasury to be used as specified 
in section 2.
    ``Section 4. The Congress shall have power to enforce and implement 
this article by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 5. This article shall take effect in the first year 
beginning at least 90 days following ratification, except that outlays 
shall not surpass the sum of the limit described in section 1 and the 
following portion of the prior year's outlays exceeding that limit 
(excepting emergency outlays as provided for in section 2): six-
sevenths in the first year, five-sixths in the second, four-fifths in 
the third, three-fourths in the fourth, two-thirds in the fifth, one-
half in the sixth, and the limit shall bind in the seventh year and 
thereafter.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(b)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, John M. Presley, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
          ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:    May 10, 2005.


                              /s/ John M. Presley
                              ______________________________

                              John M. Presley
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW950037_1.doc
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy meeting; Notice

SUMMARY: The U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy will meet on 
January 21 in Room 600, 301 4th Street, S.W., Washington, D.C., from 
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.
    The Commission will meet with Mr. Kevin Klose, Director, 
International Bureau of Broadcasting, to discuss television policies, 
programs, and potential in U.S. international broadcasting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Please call Betty Hayes, (202) 619-4468, if 
you are interested in attending the meeting. Space is limited and 
entrance to the building is controlled.

    Dated: January 13, 1998.
Rose Royal,
Management Analyst, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 98-1149 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
No. 12-460.

#### Spadoni *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration (BXA).
    Title: Report of Requests for Restrictive Trade Practice or 
Boycott, Single or Multiple Transactions.
    Agency Form Number: 621P, 6051P, 6051P-A.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0012.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection of 
information.
    Burden: 3,306 hours.
    Average Hours per Response: 121 to 151 minutes per response.
    Number of Respondents: 1,574 respondents.
    Needs and Uses: The Export Administration Regulations require U.S. 
persons to report any requests that they have received to take any 
action to comply with, further, or support an unsanctioned foreign 
boycott. The intent of this requirement is to counteract the 
participation of U.S. firms in other nations' economic boycotts or 
embargoes. The information provided by firms is used to monitor 
requests for participating in foreign boycotts and analyze changing 
trends for purposes of deciding U.S. policy and to initiate boycott 
investigations.
    Affected Public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit 
institutions.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: Dennis Marvich, (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Dennis Marvich, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 98-10454 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
#### STATE EX REL. Charles Wayne SNEED v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-1727

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

01/09/2018

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF BIENVILLE

PER CURIAM:

I ,Denied. With the enactment of 2017 La. Acts, No. 280, § 3, including R.S. 15:574.4(H), relator’s eligibility for parole consideration is no longer dependent upon a commutation of his sentence to a fixed term of years, but will instead be governed by the criteria set forth in R.S. 15:574.4(H). As such, his claims are moot, and intervention is not warranted.
```

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

         (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 12, 2004

                                       /S/          PAUL N. SCHWARTZ
                                     ----------------------------------------------
                                                    Paul N. Schwartz
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
Exhibit 10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 
 EXECUTION COPY 
 AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT dated as of January 1, 2012 (this “Amendment”) to the AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of December 15, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”) by and
between Chindex International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Lawrence Pemble (“Employee”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment will have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.

 WHEREAS, the Company and Employee have entered into the Employment Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement in the following respects, effective commencing the date
hereof; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 1(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the sentence in its entirety and
replacing it with the following: “The Company agrees to employ Employee, and Employee agrees to be so employed, in the position of Executive Vice President (EVP) and Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Company, reporting to the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) of the Company.” 
 2. The second sentence of Section 4(b)(1) of the Employment Agreement (the definition
of “Good Reason”) is hereby amended by deleting all references to “CFO” and replacing them with “COO.” 
 3. Except as provided above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 4. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same. 

 
 [Signature page follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above
written. 
  

	
	
	/s/ Lawrence Pemble
	Lawrence Pemble


  
  

			
	CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Roberta Lipson
	 Name:
 Title:
	 	 Roberta Lipson
 Chief
Executive Officer



  
 [Pemble Employment
Amendment Signature Page]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lane Co # 3, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, John D. Lane,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

January 9, 2007


/s/ John D. Lane, President
------------------------------------
John D. Lane,
Principal Executive Officer &
Principal Financial Officer
#### BELTS, M. v. MORRIS, B.

93 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/27/2017

246-S-2006 (Bedford)

Appeal Dismissed
#### COM. v. WILLIAMS, A.

109 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-06-CR-0004735-2009 (Berks)

Affirmed
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Maryland Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Maryland Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 443    | 714    | 676    | 235    | 650    | 786    | 769    | 482    | 764    | 697   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 769    | 657    | 804    | 696    | 939    | 1,831  | 4,881  | 1,439  | 813    | 715   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 684    | 2,926  | 3,814  | 4,437  | 2,157  | 3,203  | 296    | 631    | 1,002  | 4,859 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 366    | 394    | 386    | 461    | 604    | 467    | 348    | 513    | 553    | 567   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 412    | 519    | 635    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024