alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History: Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                      
|                                                                                   
|Virginia Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Synthetic Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   
|                                                                                   
|Virginia Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Synthetic Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 57     | 109    | 18     | 71     | 49     | 69     | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### David MALDONADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1200

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-14543CF10A.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 132 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 132

    Providing funding to ensure the printing and production of the 
 authorized number of copies of the revised and updated version of the 
  House document entitled ``Hispanic Americans in Congress'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2012

   Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California (for himself and Mr. Serrano) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
    Providing funding to ensure the printing and production of the 
 authorized number of copies of the revised and updated version of the 
  House document entitled ``Hispanic Americans in Congress'', and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. FUNDING TO ENSURE PRODUCTION OF AUTHORIZED NUMBER OF COPIES 
              OF REVISED VERSION OF ``HISPANIC AMERICANS IN CONGRESS''.

    Notwithstanding section 2(b) of House Concurrent Resolution 90, One 
Hundred Seventh Congress (agreed to December 7, 2001), in printing the 
updated version of House Document 103-299, entitled ``Hispanic 
Americans in Congress'' (as revised by the Library of Congress), the 
Public Printer shall print the maximum number of copies of such 
Document for which the total printing and production costs do not 
exceed an amount equal to the amount provided for under such section, 
increased by $700,000.

SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN HOUSE DOCUMENTS.

    (a) Electronic Publication.--Upon request of the Committee on House 
Administration of the House of Representatives, the Public Printer 
shall publish and disseminate an electronic version of each of the 
House documents referred to in subsection (b), under the direction of 
the Committee.
    (b) Documents Described.--The House documents referred to in this 
subsection are as follows:
            (1) The updated version of House Document 103-299, entitled 
        ``Hispanic Americans in Congress'', as described in section 1.
            (2) House Document 108-223, entitled ``Women in Congress, 
        1917-2006''.
            (3) House Document 108-224, entitled ``Black Americans in 
        Congress, 1870-2007''.
                                 <all>
```
#### IN RE: Jon W. CHAFFEE, Debtor. B. Casey Yim, Appellant, v. Jon W. Chaffee, Appellee.

No. 17-60036

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted February 13, 2018 *

Filed February 23, 2018

B. Casey Yim, Pro Se

Jon W. Chaffee, Pro Se

Before: LEAYY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges,

*

**The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P, 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

B. Casey Yim appeals pro se from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s judgment in favor of debtor Jon Chaffee in an adversary proceeding regarding the discharge of Yim’s claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. *Anastas v. Am. Sav. Bank (In re Anastas),*94 F.3d 1280, 1283 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that Yim failed to demonstrate that his claim satisfied the elements for non-dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). *See id.*(factual determinations of whether elements of § 523(a)(2)(A) are satisfied are reviewed for clear error); *Ghomeshi v. Sabban (In re Sabban),*600 F.3d 1219, 1222 (9th Cir. 2010) (creditor has burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that § 523(a)(2)(A) elements *are*met).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued in the opening briefs, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. *See Padgett v. Wright,*587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is *not*appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(b)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, John M. Presley, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)       the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
          in all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.


Dated:    November 9, 2005.


                              /s/ John M. Presley
                              ______________________________

                              John M. Presley
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW1029293_1.doc
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Nancy D. Parmelee, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March
21, 2005



/s/     Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Trinidad and Tobago  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Trinidad and Tobago  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 0       | 0       | 50,777 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 98,949  | 98,009  | 151,104 | 378,069 | 462,100 | 439,246 | 389,268 | 447,758 | 266,821 | 236,202
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 189,748 | 128,620 | 112,207 | 69,744  | 42,818  | 71,439  | 84,190  | 70,450  | 65,819  | 46,872 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 39,233  | 21,423  | 23,535  | 11,929  |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-1231.

#### Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services *v.*Auburn Regional Medical Center et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 933.] Motion of the Court-appointed *amicus curiae*for divided argument granted.
No. 12-6337.

#### Deida *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
510P04-3

#### State v. Jose Luis Macias

Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied 10/31/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO AS OF DECEMBER 31,1995 AND
1994, AND FOR EACH OF THE YEARS IN THE THREE YEAR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          50,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  433,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,467
<INVENTORY>                                    251,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               851,207
<PP&E>                                       1,263,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 636,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,691,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          414,732
<BONDS>                                          6,179
<COMMON>                                       162,677
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     972,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,691,528
<SALES>                                      2,344,170
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,344,170
<CGS>                                        1,673,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,233,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 95,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
#### Daniel MATERDOMINI, et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SHELBORNE OCEAN BEACH HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0789

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 31, 2017

L.T. NO.: 14-20989

Dismissed.
No. 12-6750.

#### Knittel *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STEVEN GROENER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2348 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 18, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. Steven Groener, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan S. Tannen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: J.H.G., a Minor

339 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/21/2017

CP-51-AP-0000709-2016

CP-51-DP0002516-2014

*404FID#: 51-FN-002315-2014

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO 

LIGHTSEY NATHAN SAUL, JR., )

 ) No. 08-12-00030-CR

Appellant, )

 ) Appeal from the 83rd District Court

vs. )

 ) of Pecos County, Texas 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, )

 ) (TC# 2849)

Appellee. )

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in the above styled and numbered cause was originally due March 

8, 2012. The Court has granted numerous extensions of time, the most recent having been 

granted until March 27, 2013. Portions of the reporter’s record have been filed, but fourteen 

volumes remain to be filed. The Court has been unsuccessful in its recent efforts to contact the 

court reporter, Ms. Patricia Phelps, regarding the missing volumes. Consequently, the Court has 

determined it is necessary for the trial court to conduct a hearing regarding the court reporter’s 

failure to timely file the reporter’s record in this appeal. 

It is therefore ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether 

Appellant has been deprived of the remaining portion of the reporter’s record for any reason, 

including whether the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, such that Appellant might be 

entitled to a new trial pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 34.6(f). The trial court shall determine the 

following:

1. whether a significant portion of the court reporter’s notes and exhibits have been lost or 

destroyed, and if so, whether the loss or destruction occurred without any fault of the 

Appellant;

2. if the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, whether the lost or destroyed portion is 

necessary to the appeal’s resolution;

3. if the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed, whether it can be replaced by 

agreement of the parties; and

4. if the reporter’s record has not been lost or destroyed, the trial court shall determine the 

earliest date the reporter’s record can be completed and filed in the court of appeals. 

1
The trial court is authorized to hear evidence and to determine any additional matters it 

deems relevant to this inquiry. The court is also authorized to enter any orders to ensure that the 

reporter’s record is filed at the earliest date possible. The trial court is directed to make findings 

of fact and conclusions of law regarding these matters and file same with the trial court clerk for 

inclusion in a supplemental clerk’s record. The record of such hearing and the supplemental 

clerk’s record shall be forwarded to this Court on or before May 10, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of April, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

MOURAD BALZOURT, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 5D16-2929

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed February 24, 2017

Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness 

of Appellate Counsel,

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Mourad Balzourt, Jasper, pro se. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent.

EVANDER, J. 

Mourad Balzourt was convicted of second-degree murder and abuse of a corpse. 

He was sentenced to life in prison on the murder conviction and to five years on the abuse 

of a corpse conviction. His convictions were per curiam affirmed by this court. Balzourt v. 

State, 189 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). 

Subsequently, Balzourt filed a petition and supplemental petition for postconviction 

relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d), alleging ineffective 
2

assistance of appellate counsel. He argues, inter alia, that appellate counsel should have 

raised as an issue the trial court’s failure to conduct an adequate Faretta1inquiry when 

Balzourt requested to represent himself at the sentencing hearing. We find merit to this 

argument. 

Balzourt was represented by counsel at trial. At the onset of the sentencing 

hearing, Balzourt advised the trial court of his belief that his trial counsel had a “conflict 

of interest” and made an unequivocal request to represent himself. The trial court made 

inquiry on the purported “conflict of interest” claim, but failed to conduct a Faretta inquiry. 

Thereafter, Balzourt’s request for self-representation was denied.

Failure to hold a proper Faretta hearing at a critical stage of the proceedings is 

reversible error. Eib v. State, 191 So. 3d 977, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). Sentencing is a 

critical stage of the proceedings. Id. 

Appellate counsel was ineffective in not raising on direct appeal the trial court’s 

failure to conduct a Faretta inquiry. Given that Balzourt was sentenced to life, this error 

cannot be deemed harmless. Because a new appeal would be redundant, we grant the 

petition as to this issue and remand for a Faretta hearing. If Balzourt is allowed to 

represent himself following the Faretta hearing, the trial court is directed to vacate his 

present sentence and proceed with resentencing. 

We find the other issues raised in Balzourt’s petition to be without merit.

PETITION GRANTED, in part; DENIED, in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

 

1 Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835 (1975).