alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0172.09.029 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

 Outgoing Call

Date: 12/19/2011 Time: 12:30 PM

Company Name: Black & Veatch

Contact Name: Mark Aron

Phone No.: (913) 458-4882

Name: TJ Finseth

GENERAL SUBJECT : Bottom Ash Installation Costs and Bottom Ash Wet Sluicing Installations

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I contacted Mark Aron, Black & Veatch, on December 19, 2011 to discuss an appropriate installation cost factor 

for the installation of a mechanical drag system on a new generating unit compared to a retrofit installation. Mr. 

Aron stated that the installation cost factor should be lower for the new unit installation. Mr. Aron suggested 

that a cost factor of 2 (relative to the equipment costs) would be appropriate for a retrofit installation and a cost 

factor of 1.8 or 1.9 would be more appropriate for a new generating unit. Mr. Aron explained that the 

installation is easier for a new unit because for a retrofit, the existing bottom of the boiler has to be demolished 

before the new mechanical drag system can be installed. Mr. Aron also stated that the engineering costs 

associated with a new unit would be significantly less expensive compared to a retrofit. Mr. Aron explained 

that for a retrofit installation, the design engineer has to design the demolition or the existing system and also 

design for the new system, which may have significant complications to deal with existing buildings or 

structures at the plant. For a new unit, the design engineer only has to design the new system and there 

typically aren’t as many restrictions associated with existing buildings or structures because the entire unit is 

being built from the ground up.

I also asked Mr. Aron about the number of wet sluicing bottom ash systems that Black & Veatch has either 

installed or bid on over the last 20 years. Mr. Aron looked at his records and determined that the last wet 

bottom ash handling system that he could find a record of was from 1997. Mr. Aron looked through the records 

and found that Black & Veatch has submitted bids or installed mechanical drag systems at 19 power plants 

since 1997. He stated that those 19 plants were a mix of retrofit installations and installations associated with 

new generating units. Mr. Aron stated that no power plants are installing wet bottom ash systems anymore, 

everyone is going with a mechanical drag system or completely dry systems.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas International Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Alaska Natural Gas International Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 2,982 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 44,257 | 50,231 | 47,882 | 48,346 | 50,258 | 53,002 | 49,780 | 51,655 | 48,434 | 51,289
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 44,732 | 55,929 | 49,861 | 52,857 | 52,840 | 52,883 | 50,172 | 48,599 | 51,573 | 51,424
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 52,546 | 54,005 | 52,532 | 55,989 | 62,682 | 65,283 | 67,648 | 62,187 | 65,951 | 63,607
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 65,610 | 65,753 | 63,439 | 65,698 | 62,099 | 65,124 | 60,765 | 48,396 | 39,164 | 30,536
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30,100 | 16,398 | 9,342  |        | 13,310 | 16,519 |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|New Mexico Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|New Mexico Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 36,444 | 36,940 | 36,960
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 38,026 | 38,622 | 40,312 | 40,166 | 39,846 | 38,099 | 37,796 | 38,918 | 42,067 | 43,834
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 44,164 | 44,306 | 45,469 | 45,491 | 45,961 | 47,745 | 47,233 | 48,047 | 49,235 | 48,846
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 48,757 | 49,406 | 48,914 | 50,163 | 50,216 | 50,584 | 50,737 | 51,029 | 51,222 | 51,179
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 51,655 | 51,221 | 51,309 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers - Transported  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7,191  | 12,313
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 9,744  | 5,905  | 13,486 | 15,566 | 12,507 | 12,849 | 18,476 |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 31,984 | 35,461 | 37,583 | 37,462 | 33,887 | 32,057 | 31,092 | 29,365 | 27,662 | 26,454
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 25,130 | 23,886 | 18,097 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Extension of Public Comment Period on the Draft 2(a)(ii) Wild and 
Scenic River Study Report and Environmental Assessment for the Lumber 
River, North Carolina

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service is extending the public review and 
comment period by 21 days for the draft study report on designating 
portions of the Lumber River, North Carolina, into the National Wild 
and Scenic Rivers System.

DATES: Comments must be postmarked by June 12, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the draft report are available for public 
inspection at: National Park Service, Atlanta Federal Center, 1924 
Building, 100 Alabama Street, SW, 5th Floor, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; 
National Park Service, National Center for Recreation and Conservation, 
Main Interior Building, 1849 C Street, NW, Room 3611, Washington, DC 
20240-0001; and National Park Service, 909 First Avenue, 5th Floor, 
Seattle, Washington, 98104. Hours of availability are between 8:30 a.m. 
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Additional 
copies for review are located in the Columbus County, Whiteville, Hoke 
County, Raeford, Mary Livermore, Pembroke, Robeson County, Lumberton, 
and Scotland County in Laurinburg, North Carolina, libraries during 
normal hours of operation. copies of the draft report may be obtained 
from Mary Rountree, National Park Service, at the address below.
    Comments should be directed to the National Park Service, Southeast 
Regional Office, attention Mary Rountree at the address below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rountree, National Park Service, Southeast Regional Office, 
Atlanta Federal Center, 1924 Building, 100 Alabama Street, SW, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30303, (404) 562-3175.

    Dated: April 17, 1998.
Wallace C. Brittain,
Chief, Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance, National Park 
Service, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 98-11285 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

The Honorable Michael Krancer, Secretary 

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 

Rachel Carson State Office Building 

400 Market Street 

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101 

Dear Secretary Krancer: 

JAij, 1 8 2013 

On November 27, 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to 

the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental 

Protection (DEP). This SIP revision pertains to the update of the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(MVEBs) for the Lancaster Eight-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Maintenance Plan. Revisions to the 

MVEBs consist of an update to the budgets with the use ofthe MOVES2010 model. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare 

a direct final rulemaking notice. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr at 215-

814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director 

Bureau of Air Quality, PADEP 

Sincerely, 

_Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

V Printed on I 00% recycled/recyclable paper with I 00% post-consumer fiber and process clllorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Nevada Natural Gas Withdrawals from Oil Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Nevada Natural Gas Withdrawals from Oil Wells  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        | 53     | 30     | 21     | 16     | 13     | 11     | 9      | 9      | 8     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 7      | 6      | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 3      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of GOFISH CORPORATION a Nevada corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Michael Downing, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
      of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: April
                16, 2007/s/ Michael DowningMichael
                  Downing
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
#### Melissa V. COUTANT and Andrew T. Coutant, Appellants, v. Randall R. LUCE, William L. Foreman, Leda L. Schroder, n/k/a Leda L. Foreman, and Karen Luce n/k/a Karen Bookout, Appellees.

No. 4D17-1051

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[December 13, 2017]

Melissa V. Coutant, Covington, LA, pro se, and Andrew T. Coutant, North Haven, CT, pro se.

No áppearance for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Melissa Coutant and Andrew Coutant, challenge the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint with prejudice and subsequent denial of a rule 1.540 motion in this suit for damages based on allegations of malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We affirm on all issues, except one.

As to defendant Karen Luce n/k/a Karen Bookout, we find that the trial court erred in summarily denying Andrew Coutant’s rule 1.540(b) motion for relief from judgment, which alleged that a notice of voluntary dismissal had been mailed to Karen Bookout prior to the court’s order dismissing the case with prejudice. *See Schleger v. Stebelsky,*957 So.2d 71, 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“A motion for relief from judgment should not be summarily dismissed without *448an evidentiary hearing unless its allegations and accompanying affidavits fail to allege ‘colorable entitlement’ to relief,” (citation omitted)); *see also Pino v. Bank of New York, 121*So.3d 23, 40 (Fla. 2013) (“Under a plain reading of rule 1.420(a)(1), the trial court now has no authority ,or discretion to deny a plaintiffs service.of a notice of voluntary dismissal, as the dismissal is effective upon service.”). The motion’s allegation that the notice was mailed to Karen Bookout asserted a colorable entitlement to relief insofar as the voluntary dismissal would have been effective upon being mailed. This would have stripped the trial court of jurisdiction as to that particular defendant before the court entered its order of dismissal with prejudice. Appellants concede that the notice was never mailed to the remaining defendants.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of the motion to vacate solely as to Karen Bookout and remand for an evidentiary hearing. *See Schleger,*957 So.2d at 73.

*Affirmed, in part; Reverse in part; and Remanded.*

Warner, Gross and Taylor, JJ., concur."
Memo to Docket

Meeting on FE Labeling NPRM

October 1, 2010

— 3:00PM

- 4:30 PM

Attendees

NHTSA: Greg Powell (phone)

Rebecca Yoon (phone)

EPA: Lucie Audette

Lisa Snapp

Gloria Helfand

Chris Nevers

Aaron Hula

Jeff Alson

Amy Bunker

Linc Werhly

Ford: Ed Kulik

Alyssa Werthman

Joe Supina

Expressed support for label that addresses advanced technologies

, retains traditional label metrics

Noted that written comments will be forthcoming on leadtime , label proliferation , label

titles /descriptors , printing , smartphone code

T echnical discussion of test procedures and calculation details

— clarification of NPRM intent
esph_ex105.htm








Exhibit 10.5


















Summary of Robert P. Cathey Employment Arrangement
























On August 30, 2009, Ecosphere’s Board of Directors approved a compensation package for Robert P. Cathey, formerly our Senior Vice President of and Chief Operating Officer of EES. Mr. Cathey receives an annual base salary of $125,000 per year and was granted 600,000 stock options exercisable at $0.36 per share, all of which are vested at December 31, 2011. In addition, Mr. Cathey receives one half percent of EES field services revenues. In April 2011, Mr. Cathey was named President and Chief Executive Officer of EES.