alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. f' AA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Steve Chapman 10/28/2013 Other. List below. 

Boeing Joan Lenker 12/4/2013 Other. List below. 

Boeing Alan Marx 10/2812013 & Other. List below. 

12/4/2013 

' . 

Other/Additional Information: Because the risk is fairly low, Boeing's position is that a compliance 

time of 12 months is appropriate to address the unsafe condition without putting undue burden 

on the operators. However, this AD will be correcting at least 3 safety issues including COS 

#2013-0947/-1 028 (flaps up landing issue), COS #2013-1300/- 1350 (single flap position sensor 

failure causing flight controls to transition to secondary mode issue), and COS #2012-1272 

(single spoiler failure needs EICAS alert) and will also be correcting numerous non-compliances. 

Although, quantitatively, the 12 month compliance time is within our control program fleet risk 

threshold, our guidance requires we correct the unsafe condition as soon as reasonably practical. 

Since this is only a S/W update that will take a few hours, we don't feel a compliance time of 6 

months puts undue burden on the operators. Contingent approval of Service Bulletin B787-

81205-SB270020-00 Issue 001 - FLIGHT CONTROLS - Primary Flight Control Function -

Flight Control Electronics Block Point 3 Software Change required a 6 month compliance time.
407P14-4

#### State v. Dwain Cornelius Ferrell

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP16-627)

Dismissed
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1130 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1130

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide authority for certain 
members of the Armed Forces who have served 20 years on active duty to 
   transfer entitlement to Post-9/11 Educational Assistance to their 
                              dependents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2011

Mr. Alexander introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide authority for certain 
members of the Armed Forces who have served 20 years on active duty to 
   transfer entitlement to Post-9/11 Educational Assistance to their 
                              dependents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Education Assistance to Realign New 
Eligibilities for Dependents (EARNED) Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES WHO HAVE 
              SERVED 20 YEARS ON ACTIVE DUTY TO TRANSFER ENTITLEMENT TO 
              POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO THEIR DEPENDENTS.

    (a) Transfer Authorized.--Section 3319(b) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or'';
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) 20 years of active duty service in the Armed Forces, 
        as of any date between September 11, 2001, and September 30, 
        2011, including at least 90 days of such service after 
        September 10, 2001.''.
    (b) Opportunity To Transfer Entitlement.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, during the period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act and ending on December 31, 2012, an individual 
who is entitled to educational assistance under chapter 33 of title 38, 
United States Code, and who completed at least 20 years of active duty 
service in the Armed Forces and was discharged or released from such 
service under honorable conditions before September 30, 2011, may 
transfer all or part of the individual's entitlement to an eligible 
dependent under section 3319 of title 38, United States Code.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of the Post-9/11 Veterans 
Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (title V of Public Law 110-252).
                                 <all>
```
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 682 

Commending the Children’s Home Society of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2010 

Mr. LEMIEUX submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Children’s Home Society of America. 

Whereas, since 1885, the Children’s Home Society of America (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘CHSA’’) has made 

extraordinary contributions to the well being of children 

and families in the United States; 

Whereas more than 400,000 children have been placed in loving, permanent families by CHSA members across the 

United States; 

Whereas CHSA members have aided in the creation of many 

successful and sustainable programs that help children to 

be safe, healthy, and prepared for life; 

Whereas the CHSA provides services to more than 570,000 

children and families each year; 

Whereas the CHSA engages more than 12,500 volunteers to 

support the efforts of the CHSA in finding permanent 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•SRES 682 IS 

homes for children in foster care, building community 

schools, improving the health and mental health of children and families in the United States, providing temporary housing, and assisting foster youth to become successful adults; and 

Whereas CHSA members receive more than $90,000,000 annually in cash resources from individuals and corporations to support the efforts of the CHSA: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the Senate— 

2 (1) commends the more than 6,700 staff and 

3 12,500 volunteers of the Children’s Home Society of 

4 America for the dedication and commitment of the 

5 Children’s Home Society of America to the children 

6 and families of the United States; 

7 (2) recognizes the Children’s Home Society of 

8 America for leveraging human, financial, and mate9 rial resources to carry out the mission of the Chil10 dren’s Home Society of America of helping children 

11 and families to remain safe, healthy, and prepared 

12 for life; and 

13 (3) encourages the continued efforts of the staff 

14 and volunteers of the Children’s Homes Society of 

15 America on behalf of the children and families of the 

16 United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### COM. v. ZIRKLE, S.

752 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/04/2017

CP-20-CR-0000143-2009

(Crawford)

Affirmed
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Gentor Resources, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10K-SB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Lloyd J. Bardswich, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 31, 2008   /s/ Lloyd J. Bardswich   Name: Lloyd J. Bardswich Title:  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF HOULIHAN SMITH & COMPANY INC.We hereby consent to the references to our firm with respect to the analyses we performed as ofAugust 31, September 30, and December 1, 2007 regarding expected stock price volatility and projectedconversion and exercise behaviors over the term of stock options granted to employees andconvertible notes and warrants issued to investors in private placement transactions during theperiod covered by our analysis contained in the Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Smart Move, Inc. and any amendments thereto, and to all references to us as havingconducted such analysis. In giving the foregoing consent, we do not admit that we come within thecategory of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, asamended (the “Securities Act”), or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, nor do weadmit that we are experts with respect to any part of such Form 10-KSB within the meaning of theterm “experts” as used in the Securities Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.CONSENT OF HOULIHAN SMITH & COMPANY INC.By: /s/ Karl D’Cunha
# C_2019039EN.01001001.xml

| 1.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9139 — Haier/Candy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 39/02)

On 13 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9139. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9139. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Louisiana Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Louisiana Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1.74  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1.88   | 1.70   | 1.73   | 1.70   | 1.71   | 1.85   | 2.22   | 2.63   | 2.67   | 2.43  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.61   | 4.42   | 3.42   | 5.00   | 5.61   | 9.04   | 6.64   | 6.98   | 9.76   | 3.89  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.84   | 7.57   | 7.98   | 14.40  | 14.59  | 8.32   | --     | --     | --     | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | --     | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
464P16

#### State v. Terril Courtney Battle

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-355)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 12/22/2016

2.
#### COM. v. LEWIS, D.

1673 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/10/2017

Reargument Denied 10/20/2017

CP-02-CR-0008184-2010

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Rocky Mountain Fudge, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007,
        as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), Steven D. Moulton, Principal
        Accounting Officer
        of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d)
        of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.


/s/ Steven
                D.
                MoultonSteven
                  D. Moulton
                Principal Accounting
                  Officer
                October
                  15, 2008




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
 other
        document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
 signature
        that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
 written
        statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
 the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
        its
 staff
        upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the
 Company's
        Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
 Act
        of
        2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
 18,
        United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
        10-KSB
 or
        as a
        separate disclosure document.
     11
Exhibit 12.1 

**CERTIFICATE**

I, JORGE HORACIO BRITO,CERTIFY THAT: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Macro S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 29, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1211-DR]


North Carolina; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Carolina (FEMA-1211-DR), dated March 22, 1998 and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective April 1, 1998.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10210 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
08/17/2012 08:56 FAX 814 447 3747 OAS OS ~003/003

A division of the American Chemical $o~ie~

Inventory Expert Service

Phone: 800-631-1884, 614.447-3u70

~ 614-.441-3747

E-m~,lh ~nswers@c,~s.or~

Web~ v~,,w.~;~s.o r’E,/pr~duct.s/cliend

I’NVKNTOKY EXPERT SBRVICE REPORT

~_~ yott= IES order, please make the same co~rec~ion(s) to you~ PMNbefo=e

CA$ 2~10 Olenmn~ River Road RO, 8ax 3343 Columbu=, Ohio 43210-0334 USA
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 19-1053

__________

JASON L. BROWN,

Appellant

v.

LISA M. BROWN

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 3:18-mc-00676)

District Judge: Honorable Robert D. Mariani

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

November 1, 2019

Before: SHWARTZ, RESTREPO and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 7, 2019)

___________

OPINION*

___________

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

PER CURIAM

Jason Brown filed in the District Court a collection of state court documents under 

the mistaken belief that doing so was the next step in the appeals process for his child 

custody case in Schuylkill County.1 The District Court permitted Brown to proceed in 

forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The District Court then dismissed his action 

with prejudice because it neither resembled any pleading contemplated by the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, nor presented “any case or controversy over which this Court 

has jurisdiction or can grant relief.” ECF 3 at 2. Brown appealed; we have jurisdiction, 

see 28 U.S.C. § 1291; and our review is plenary, see SEC v. Infinity Grp. Co., 212 F.3d 

180, 186 & n.6 (3d Cir. 2000); Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000).

Dismissal of Brown’s case with prejudice was proper, for the reasons stated by the 

District Court. Additionally, the District Court was not obligated to sua sponte offer 

leave to amend, cf. Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc., 482 F.3d 

247, 252-53 (3d Cir. 2007), and amendment would have been futile, regardless, see, e.g., 

Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 703 (1992) (holding that divorce, alimony, and 

child custody decrees fall under “domestic relations exception” to federal courts’ subject 

matter jurisdiction); Great W. Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP, 615 F.3d 

 

1 Brown’s Notice of Appeal, see ECF 5 at 1, pro se opening brief, and related appeal, see 

Brown v. Brown, 775 F. App’x 722 (3d Cir. 2019), all confirm as much.
3

159, 166 (3d Cir. 2010) (setting forth test for application of jurisdictional bar of RookerFeldman doctrine). Accordingly, the judgement of the District Court will be affirmed.