alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Utah Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.05   | 1.01   | 1.01   | 1.04   | 1.17   | 1.26   | 1.17  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.11   | 1.15   | 1.21   | 1.08   | 1.24   | 1.20   | 1.37   | 1.28   | 1.35   | 1.36  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.38   | 1.49   | 1.44   | 1.44   | 1.23   | 1.27   | 1.47   | 1.51   | 1.35   | 1.51  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.59   | 1.52   | 1.59   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. REXROTH, W.

1950 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/08/2017

CP-01-CR-0000190-2015

(Adams)

*1060Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


          CWHEQ, INC. REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-I
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2005-I


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i)   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 24, 2006
------------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 24, 2006
------------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
# C_2019273EN.01000201.xml

| 14.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.9014 — PKN Orlen/Grupa Lotos)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 273/03)

On 7 August 2019, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+ 32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No. M.9014 — PKN Orlen/Grupa Lotos, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENEWAL OF IMPORT RESTRICTIONS UNDER 

4 BURMESE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY ACT 

5 OF 2003. 
2 

•HJ 66 EH 

1 (a) IN GENERAL.—Congress approves the renewal of 

2 the import restrictions contained in section 3(a)(1) and 

3 section 3A (b)(1) and (c)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and 

4 Democracy Act of 2003. 

5 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This joint resolution 

6 shall be deemed to be a ‘‘renewal resolution’’ for purposes 

7 of section 9 of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act 

8 of 2003. 

9 SEC. 2. PAYGO COMPLIANCE. 

10 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

11 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

12 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

13 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

14 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

15 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro16 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

17 vote on passage. 
3 

•HJ 66 EH 

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 This joint resolution shall take effect on the date of 

3 the enactment of this joint resolution or July 26, 2011, 

4 whichever occurs earlier. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 20, 2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions conAct of 2003. tained in the Burmese Freedom and Democracy
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                         
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ GABRIEL TIRADOR                     
|                  |  |  |  | Gabriel Tirador, Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Opinion issued September 3 0, 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 21
- 00237
- CV

——————————— IN RE ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , Relat or

Original P r oceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON Relator Atain Special ty Insurance Company filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to order Respondent “ to v acate her May 4, 2021 order denying [Relator ’ s] p lea to the jurisdic t ion and in its place enter an order granting the plea and d ismissing the claims asserted against Atain without prejudice

. ” 1

1 T he un derlying case is Jam ie Blackburn, Ron Hoss Strimple, Indivi d ually and as next friend of C.S. v. Atain Special ty Insurance Company, and Harold ’ s F u n Town, LLC , C ause N o. CV

- 0085834 , pend ing in the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Galveston County, Texas, t h e Ho n orable Kerri M. Foley presiding.2

We deny the petition. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 2.8( a)

. All pending motions are di smissed as moot.

P ER C URIAM
Panel consists of Chief Just i ce Radack and Justices Rivas

- Molloy and Guerra.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boundary Revision: Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical 
Park

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of boundary revision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the National Park Service is 
revising the boundary of Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical 
Park to include one additional tract of land.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Chief, Acquisition Division, National 
Park Service, AT/LAFO, PO Box 908, Martinsburg, WV 25402, (304) 263-
4943.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 91-664, enacted January 8, 1971 
authorizes the acquisition of certain lands for the Chesapeake and Ohio 
Canal National Historical Park. Section 7(c)(ii) of the Land and Water 
Conservation Fund Act, as amended by Pub. L. 104-333, authorizes minor 
boundary revisions of areas within the National Park System. Such 
boundary revisions may be made, when necessary, after advising the 
appropriate Congressional Committees and following publication in the 
Federal Register.
    In order to properly interpret and preserve the historic character 
of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park it is 
necessary to revise the existing boundary to include one additional 
tract of land comprising approximately 115.24 acres. The property is 
being acquired by donation.
    Notice is hereby given that the exterior boundary of the Chesapeake 
and Ohio Canal National Historical Park is hereby revised to include 
the following tract of land: All of the same land acquired by Adele C. 
Charpentier and Cleopatra Charpentier, from the Mount Vernon Trust 
Company, by deed dated December 1, 1941 and recorded December 8, 1941 
in Deed Book 217, Page 322 in the Land Records of Washington County, 
State of Maryland.
    Subject to existing easements for public roads and highways, public 
utilities, railroads and pipelines.
    This tract of land is depicted on Segment Map 81, identified as 
P81-1 dated June, 1971. The maps are on file and available for 
inspection in the office of the National Park Service, Appalachian 
Trail Land Acquisition Field Office, 1314 Edwin Miller Boulevard, P. O. 
Box 908, Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401

    Dated: April 1, 1998.

Terry R. Carlstrom,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 98-11717 Filed 5-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Bureau of Consular Affairs
[Public Notice 2706]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection; Application 
for Passport/Registration (DSP-11).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State is seeking Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) approval for the information collection described below. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment in 
the Federal Register preceding submission to OMB. This process is 
conducted in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The following summarizes the information collection proposal 
submitted to OMB:
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Organizating Office: Bureau of Consular Affairs.
    Title of Information Collection: Application for Passport/
Registration.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Form Number: DSP-11.
    Respondents: Citizens and Nationals of the United States who are 
applying for registration as a U.S. citizen abroad.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 4,400,000.
    Average Hours Per Response: 20 minutes.
    Total Estimated Burden: 1,466,666.6 hours.
    Public comments are being solicited to permit the agency to--
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is 
necessary for the proper performance of the agency functions.
    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection.
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected.
    <bullet> Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other 
forms of technology.

FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments regarding the collection 
listed in this notice or requests for copies of the proposed collection 
and supporting documents should be directed to Charles S. Cunningham, 
Directives Management Branch, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, (202) 647-0596.

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Glen H. Johnson,
Acting Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1009 Filed 1-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 98-58, RM-9252]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Brewster, MA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by 
Brewster Broadcasting Company proposing the allotment of Channel 232A 
to Brewster, Massachusetts, as that community's first local broadcast 
service. The channel can be allotted to Brewster with a site 
restriction 6.3 kilometers (3.9 miles) west of the community at 
coordinates 41-46-31 and 70-00-38..

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before June 15, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before June 30, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Gary S. Smithwick, 
Smithwick & Belendiuk, P.C., 1990 M Street, NW., Suite 510, Washington, 
D.C. 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 98-58, adopted April 15, 1998, 
and released April 24, 1998. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-11737 Filed 5-1-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Illinois Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Illinois Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Biomass Gas   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 3      | 2      | 4      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,213  | 1,286  | 1,398  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY JAY BLACKWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-319, CA-96-2854-0-6)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Otis Kneece, KNEECE, KNEECE & BROWN, Columbia, South Carolina; Steven Jay Wisotsky, Miami, Florida; Robert Arnold Hassell,

Hillsborough, North Carolina, for Appellant. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Blackwell seeks to appeal the district court's order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Blackwell,

Nos. CR-90-319; CA-96-2854-0-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 1997). Because

Blackwell's claims of ineffective trial and appellate counsel are

without merit, we find it unnecessary to address whether Blackwell's motion was timely under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective

Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.

1214. Finally, we deny Blackwell's motion for oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED