alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|No chart available.                                                               
|No chart available.                                                               
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Tennessee Natural Gas Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### KESSLER, L. v. KESSLER, K.

1581 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/07/2017

CI-11-01958

(Lancaster)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 66 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 66

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to celebrate the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 
 and recognize the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity for its work to erect a 
                  monument to the civil rights leader.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2011

Mr. Fattah (for himself, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Clarke of Michigan, 
    Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Scott of 
Virginia, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Rangel, and 
 Mr. Hinchey) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for a ceremony to celebrate the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., 
 and recognize the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity for its work to erect a 
                  monument to the civil rights leader.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR CEREMONY TO CELEBRATE MARTIN 
              LUTHER KING AND RECOGNIZE ALPHA PHI ALPHA FRATERNITY FOR 
              WORK TO ERECT A KING MONUMENT.

    (a) Authorization.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
is authorized to be used on August 27, 2011, for a ceremony to 
celebrate the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and recognize the 
Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity for its work to erect a monument to the 
civil rights leader.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
ceremony described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
444P16

#### Susan Hedden v. Ann Isbell

1. Defs Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA (COA16-406)

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*

2. Denied
No. 12-5749.

#### Hunt *v.*Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6236.

#### Young *v.*Madison et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *(per curiam).*

Justice Sotomayor and Justice *1008Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|North Dakota Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|North Dakota Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0   | Year-1   | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6   | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |          |          |         |        |         |         |          | -5,428  | -13,344 | -4,038 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 9,598    | 2,155    | -3,272  | -5,214 | -2,542  | 267     | 1,632    | -26,521 | -12,197 | 8,996  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,620    | 6,136    | 5,087   | 9,498  | -18,820 | -21,828 | -110,861 | -71,749 | -63,459 | -58,379
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -134,715 | -136,694 | -46,611 |        |         |         |          |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Maryland Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Maryland Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 212,017 | 188,552 | 196,350
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 212,133 | 178,376 | 196,276 | 197,024 | 194,725 | 202,509 | 182,294 | 201,053 | 196,067 | 196,510
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 212,020 | 193,986 | 208,946 | 197,356 | 207,103 | 215,005 | 219,024 | 222,881 | 300,637 | 298,599
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 282,843 | 288,203 | 301,062 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 15, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2198

Lower Tribunal No. 16-3753

________________



### MVW Management, LLC

,

Appellant,

vs.



### Regalia Beach Developers LLC, etc., et al.

,

Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Michael A. Hanzman

, Judge.

Leon Cosgrove, LLC, and Scott B. Cosgrove and Ellen Ross Belfer;

McDermott Will & Emery LLP, and Marcos D. Jimenez

, for appellant.

Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP, and Michael N. Kreitzer and

James J. Ward

, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.We adopt the well-reasoned analysis outlined by the trial court in the record

below and affirm the ruling that MVW Management, LLC is not entitled to

advancement of its costs and attorney’s fees under either the operating agreement

or management agreement.

Affirmed.

2
# C_2019216EN.01000401.xml

| 27.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 20 March 2019 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40436 — Ancillary Sports Merchandise

Rapporteur: Slovakia

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 216/03)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment in the draft decision as regards the duration of the infringement.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

5.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
4828 Loop Central Drive
Houston TX 77081
Telephone  713-966-8966
Fax  713-218-4595
www.littonloan.com
Inv 608- Servicer Compliance Statement


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2006-CB1

The undersigned officer of Litton Loan Servicing LP provides the Annual Statement as to Compliance as  required by the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above referenced security and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during such preceding calendar year (or such shorter period in the case of the first such report) and of performanceunder this Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects for 2006, except as disclosed below:
Reconciliations for Asset-Backed Securities Related Bank Account  1122(d)(2)(vii)(D)
Our investor bank account reconciliations included certain reconciling items that were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original identification on eleve n of sixty-threeinvestor bank account reconciliations selected for testing.  The sum of the reconciling items for those eleven reconciliations was $216,950.
Adjustments to Interest Rates for Pool Assets With Variable Rates  1122(d)(4)(ix)
Our testing of sixty-five adjustable rate mortgages revealed two instances where certainadjustable rate mortgages for which the interest rate reset in the servicing system did not agree to interest rates in the appropriate source index per the borrower's note documents.These were the result of incorrect information transferring from the prior servicer.Additionally, the same sixty-five mortgages selected for testing included one instance where the adjustable rate mortgage payment change date in the servicing system did not agree to the loan documents.
Date: February 27, 2007
S:Elizabeth Folk__________________________________Elizabeth FolkSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35 a)
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF HENDERSON C OUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 21st

day of January, 2015 , the c ause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

CAROLE ANN WALLACE , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00343

- CV; Trial Court No. 2014C

- 0199

By per curiam opinion.

BARBARA LOUISE HERNA NDEZ , Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Cour t made its orde r in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered,

it is the opinion of this court that this petition for permissive appeal should be d eni ed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this cour t that Appellant’s

petition for permissive appeal be denied ; and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Te xas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyl er, this the 8 th day of J u l y, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
#### State v. Goodwin

110,651

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Oregon Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Oregon Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 5      | 3      | 3      | 2,790  | 4,080  | 4,600  | 3,800  | 4,000  | 2,500 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,815  | 2,741  | 2,580  | 4,003  | 3,221  | 1,923  | 1,439  | 1,173  | 1,067  | 1,291 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,214  | 1,110  | 837    | 731    | 467    | 454    | 621    | 409    | 778    | 821   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,407  | 1,344  | 770    | 770    | 1,142  | 848    | 801    | 659    | 499    | 399   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 320    | 205    | 13     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury
General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, tosuch officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                                              |  | 
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ THEODORE STALICK
|                  |  |  |  |                      |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.