alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### M2K, LLC, Appellant, v. TRX RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 28, 2017

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; David Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE6-014891,

*Affirmed.*
2018 ND 8

#### IN the INTEREST OF Patrick Lee LENO Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Patrick Lee Leno, Respondent and Appellant

No. 20170289

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Filed 1/22/2018

Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, petitioner and appel-lee.

Kent M. Morrow, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Patrick Leno appeals a district court order continuing his commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. Leno argues the order was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude the district court’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen
exhibit107.htm






  





  











  








Exhibit 10.7












Trinity Capital Corporation Director Fee Schedule







The following schedule lists the fees paid to the Company’s Directors in 2011:








	
Trinity Capital Corporation Directors

	
$   500 per month retainer


	
Trinity Capital Corporation Chair of the Board

	
$   500 per month retainer


	
Trinity Capital Corporation Vice-Chair of the Board

	
$   300 per month retainer*


	
Los Alamos National Bank Directors

	
$1,000 per month retainer


	
Los Alamos National Bank Compliance Committee Members

	
$   500 per month retainer


	
Title Guaranty Directors

	
$      0












* The Vice-Chair position was terminated in June 2011. The Vice-Chair was paid from January – June of 2011.







Directors who are also employees of Trinity do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.  Directors Emeriti do not receive any compensation for their service.












The following is the current schedule of fees, effective March 1, 2012:








	
Trinity Capital Corporation Directors

	
$  500 per month retainer


	
Trinity Capital Corporation Chair of the Board

	
$  500 per month retainer


	
Trinity Capital Corporation Audit Committee Chair

	
$  500 per month retainer


	
Los Alamos National Bank Directors

	
$1,500 per month retainer


	
Los Alamos National Bank Compliance Committee Members

	
$       0 per month retainer


	
Title Guaranty Directors

	
$       0












Directors who are also employees of Trinity do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.  Directors Emeriti do not receive any compensation for their service.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Withdrawal of Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Angostura Diversity 
Unit Vegetation Management Plan EIS

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

SUMMARY: The Angostura Diversity Unit Vegetation Management Plan 
original NOI which was published in the Federal Register / Vol. 57, No. 
44 / Thursday, March 5, 1992 / Notices on page 7906 is hereby 
cancelled. A decision on this proposed action is no longer necessary.

DATES: This notice is effective May 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: For direct comments and further information contact: Carveth 
Kramer, Carson National Forest, 208 Cruz Alta Road, P.O. Box 558, Taos, 
NM 87571, (505) 758-62200.

    Dated: April 20, 1998.
Leonard L. Lucero,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 98-11568 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
# C_2019221EN.01001101.xml

| 2.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/11

---

Special Report No 11/2019

‘The EU’s regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management has added value — but the funding was largely unnecessary’

(2019/C 221/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 11/2019 ‘The EU’s regulation for the modernisation of air traffic management has added value — but the funding was largely unnecessary’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                   
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Maryland Natural Gas Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 62,000
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 62,000 | 62,000 | 62,000 | 62,000 | 62,000 | 62,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 64,000 | 64,000 | 64,000 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended September 30, 2008 of Pediment Gold Corp., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F/A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ John Seaman

John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



Date: June 10, 2009
#### State v. Pouncil

110,653

08/20/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### Anna MARTIN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. DEUTSCHE BANK, et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 10, 2017

L.T. NO.: 11-9820

Denied.
#### MIAMI HOLIDAYS, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. SHELBORNE OCEAN BEACH HOTEL CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0785

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 31, 2017

L.T. NO.: 14-19528

Dismissed.
#### IN RE: A.R., Minor Child, Appeal of: L.T.

180 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

63-OC-2016-0379 (Washington)

Affirmed
IIA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 95 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 17, 2011 

Received 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2012, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public 

4 Law 112–36) is further amended by striking the date 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 95 RDS 

1 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 23, 

2 2011’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Constant ALLAH

No. 2017-OK-0785

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

01/09/2018

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM

11 Writ granted in part. Because defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of second degree battery, an offense enumerated as a crime of violence in R.S. 14:2(B), he was not entitled to deferred sentences. *See*La.C.Cr.P. art. 898(E)(1)(b) (prior to amendment by 2016 La. Acts 509). Similarly, defendant was not entitled to an ex-pungement of these convictions under the provisions in effect at the time he filed his motion, though he may be in the future. *See*La.C.Cr.P. art. 978 (prior to amendment by 2016 La. Acts 125, adding Paragraph E). However, the court of appeal erred in declaring defendant’s pleas under La.C.Cr.P. art. 893 to be absolute nullities. At the time of defendant’s pleas, Article 893(A) allowed for suspended sentences to be imposed for second degree battery convictions, and defendant received suspended sentences. As a result, on review, we cannot conclude that the pleas constituted absolute nullities.

When a district court finds, even after sentencing, that a plea of guilty is constitutionally infirm, it retains the authority to vacate the sentence and set aside the plea. *See State v. Lewis,*421 So.2d 224, 226 (La. 1982); *see also State ex rel. Clark v. Marullo,*352 So.2d 223 (La. 1977). On remand, the district court should [¿first ascertain whether defendant — bearing in mind that he may nonetheless be eligible for expungement in the future — desires to withdraw his guilty pleas. If he so wishes, only then should the district court hold a contradictory hearing to determine whether the pleas were constitutionally infirm and decide whether the pleas were induced by what defendant justifiably believed to be a plea bargain which, as a matter of law, could not be kept. *See State v. Dixon,*449 So.2d 463, 464 (La. 1984).
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Michigan Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### HOPSON v. SMYTH.

No. 6084.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 12, 1950.

Decided June 14, 1950.

Bud Hopson, pro se.

Frederick T. Gray, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia (J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and WYCHE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case. The appellant is held in custody under the judgment of a Virginia state court; and it appears not only that there is no merit in his petition but also that he has not exhausted his remedies under state law. The order of the lower court would, *937therefore, he affirmed if the appeal were properly before us. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587; Washington v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 658. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, and must accordingly be dismissed. Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Juan B. OLIVA and Migdalia P. Oliva, his wife, Appellants, v. GENERAL MACHINE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1159

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach *378County; Edward A. Garrison, Acting Circuit Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CA022587XXXXAI.

Affirmed.
#### IN the INTEREST OF: S.H., a minor, Appeal of: J.M.

1622 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/10/2017

CP-02-DP-541-2016

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
| 16. | Vacation | The      Employee is entitled to 5 weeks paid vacation (25 working days) per year.      Vacation is pro-rated for the first year. The      Employee shall further be entitled to receive his salary at public      holidays which apply in the Canton of the  Valais. |
|-----|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| i)  | Except      as specifically amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall continue in      full force and effect in accordance with the provisions hereof on the date      hereof and nothing herein contained shall be construed as waiver or      modification of existing rights under the Original Agreement, except as      such rights are expressly modified hereby.  |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ii) | This      Amendment Agreement constitutes an entire agreement and understanding of      the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. The Amendment      Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws      of Switzerland.                                                                                                                  |

| Flagstone      Réassurance Suisse SA    |                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|  /s/      Guy Swayne                                   |                             |  /s/      Frédéric      Traimond |   |
| Guy      SwayneCEO                                          | Frédéric      Traimond |
194A16

#### State v. Michael Antonio Bullock

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-731)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent

1. Allowed 05/23/20X6

2. Allowed 06/16/2016

3.-
Exhibit 10.32
 Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.  9605 Medical Center Drive, Suite 300  Rockville, MD 20850
     Termination Date
 Effective Date and Revocation
 Salary and Vacation Pay
 Bonus
 Severance Pay




---



##### 



COBRA Premiums
 Stock Options Exhibit A
 Release of All Claims
 2




---



##### 



No Admission
 Other Agreements Exhibit B
 Company Property
 Confidentiality of Agreement
 No Disparagement
 Severability
 Choice of Law
 Execution
 3




---



##### 



Acknowledgement Exhibit C
  Very truly yours,Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.By
    
    /s/ Mihael H. PolymeropoulosTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
  /s/ Steve ShallcrossSignature of Steve Shallcross
 4
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Ohio  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Ohio  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.47   | 4.17   | 3.89   | 3.40   | 3.26   | 3.31  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.09   | 3.05   | 3.26   | 3.52   | 3.48   | 3.84   | 4.37   | 5.18   | 4.70   | 4.83  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6.10   | 8.25   | 4.68   | 6.54   | 7.49   | 10.66  | 9.87   | 8.64   | 10.41  | 6.60  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.87   | 5.51   | 4.47   | 4.51   | 4.91   | 4.49   | 3.27   | 3.96   | 3.97   | 3.60  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.13   | 4.53   | 6.59   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
IB 

House Calendar No. 173 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1073 

[Report No. 112–711] 

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed in Jackson, 

Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2011 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

DECEMBER 20, 2012 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 1073 RH

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed 

in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United 

States Courthouse’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 1073 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse to be constructed at 

5 the site bounded on the north by Court Street, on the west 

6 by West Street, on the south by South Street, and on the 

7 east by President Street in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be 

8 known and designated as the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United 

9 States Courthouse’’. 

10 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

11 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

12 paper, or other record of the United States to the court13 house referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a ref14 erence to the ‘‘R. Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with 
House Calendar No. 173 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1073 

[Report No. 112–711] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse to be 

Jess Brown United States Courthouse’’. constructed in Jackson, Mississippi, as the ‘‘R. 

DECEMBER 20, 2012 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with