alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Montana Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Montana Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 373,963 | 373,960
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 373,960 | 373,960 | 375,010 | 375,010 | 375,010 | 375,010 | 375,010 | 342,785 | 371,510 | 371,510
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 371,510 | 372,000 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 374,201 | 376,301
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,301 | 376,225 | 376,225 | 376,225
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 376,225 | 376,225 | 376,225 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 569 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 569

   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2010

   Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Notifying the President of the United States of the election of a 
                         President pro tempore.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States be notified of 
the election of the Honorable Daniel K. Inouye as President of the 
Senate pro tempore.
                                 <all>
```
Baseline 4.81 gallons/100 bhp-hr

2017 Std 4.52 gallons/100 bhp-hr

Credit Needed for No Improvement 0.29 4.81-4.52

% reduction 6%

Natural Gas Credited 0.72

85% lower than baseline (take 

baseline x 0.15)

%reduction 85% attained with no new hardware

Natural Gas Credit Generated

Standard 4.52

Credited 0.72

Credit 3.80

Noncompliant Engines Allowed with 

Credit 13.1 0.77 credit / 0.29

Diesel Engine Compliance Cost $ 1,325

Value of Credit $ 18,680

14 engines don't have to add 

new hardware (1 CNG and 13.1 

diesels)

Lifetime Fuel Consumption 130,740 baseline (gallons)

Lifetime CO2 Production 1,319 baseline (metric tons)

CO2 reduction per NGV Vehicle (545) 22% reduction from 1 NGV + no 

change from 13.1-2.6 diesels

SCC Value $ (11,986) $22/ton

Diesel Fuel Displaced 33,839 no savings in Energy space, small 

savings in diesel fuel

Energy Security $ 5,753 $0.17/gallon

0.15 Credit Approach
Baseline 4.81 gallons/100 bhp-hr

2017 Std 4.52 gallons/100 bhp-hr

Credit Needed for No 

Improvement

0.29 4.81-4.52

% reduction 6%

Natural Gas Attained 3.75 22% lower in CO2 space

%reduction 22% attained with no new hardware

Natural Gas Credit 

Generated

Standard 4.52

Attained 3.75

Credit 0.77

Noncompliant Engines 

Allowed with Credit 2.6 0.77 credit / 0.29

Diesel Engine Compliance 

Cost

$ 1,325

Value of Credit $ 4,835 3.6 engines don't have to add new 

hardware (1 CNG and 2.6 diesels)

Lifetime Fuel Consumption 130,740 baseline (gallons)

Lifetime CO2 Production 1,319 baseline (metric tons)

CO2 reduction per NGV 

Vehicle 290

22% reduction from baseline (reduction 

3.6 diesel engines would have gotten)

SCC Value $ 6,385 $22/ton

Diesel Fuel Displaced 130,740 no savings in Energy space, large savings 

in diesel fuel

Energy Security $ 22,226 $0.17/gallon

CO2 Approach
MATERIAL TERMS OF THE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN. The Company's executive
officers and other key management personnel, as determined by the Compensation
Committee, are eligible for cash bonuses under the Company's Management 
Incentive Plan (the "Incentive Plan").  Bonuses under the Incentive Plan are 
paid out of a bonus pool that is established by the Compensation Committee 
based on the Company's actual performance compared to one or more Performance 
Measures (as defined below).

    No later than 90 days after the beginning of each fiscal year, the
Compensation Committee will select the persons who will be eligible to
participate in the Incentive Plan. At that time, the Compensation Committee will
also allocate the bonus pool among the participants, which allocation may be
based on one or more Performance Measures and satisfaction of written
performance goals with respect to each selected Performance Measure. The
Incentive Plan performance goals may be based on any one or more of the
following criteria (the "Performance Measures") or a combination thereof: (i)
net earnings; (ii) earnings per share; (iii) earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and/or amortization; (iv) pre-tax operating income; (v) return on
equity; (vi) return on assets; (vii) cash flows; (viii) return on invested
capital; (ix) Economic Value Added; and (x) total shareholder return. These
criteria can be applied on either an absolute or relative (with respect to the
Company's operating plans, the Company's past performance or the performance of
other companies) basis, and on either a consolidated or business unit level. In
addition, to the extent consistent with the goal of providing for deductibility
under Section 162(m), the Compensation Committee may consider other performance
criteria in determining the level of actual payouts from the bonus pool. The
Compensation Committee has the discretion to payout less than the full amount of
the bonus pool.

    The maximum amount of compensation that may be paid under the Incentive Plan
to any participant in any given fiscal year is the lesser of 200% of the
participant's base salary or $900,000. The Compensation Committee may not
increase the amount of any participant's bonus under the Incentive Plan as so
determined, but may reduce, or totally eliminate, such bonus if the Compensation
Committee determines that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate in
order to reflect the participant's performance or other factors.

    All payments pursuant to the Incentive Plan are to be made in cash, unless
the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, and only after the Compensation
Committee certifies that the pre-established performance goals for that
particular year have been satisfied.

    The Incentive Plan shall be in effect for the Company's fiscal year ended
January 3, 1998 and will continue in effect for subsequent years unless and
until terminated by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the provisions
of the plan. The Board may suspend, amend or terminate the Incentive Plan
without shareholder approval at any time, except to the extent Section 162(m)
requires shareholder approval thereof.
SERVED JANUARY 17, 2012 

^i^i; M' ^ 1 p 2' :iH 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON. DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MAUREEN T. WILSON-DOUBEK 

FA A DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMSFAA-2ni l-0fiS3 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DECISION 

Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed on January 

3, 2012 a Motion for a Decision ("Motion"), arguing that Respondent Maureen T. 

Wilson-DoLibek ("Respondent") has admitted all relevant factual allegations^ No genuine 

issue of material fact remains in the case, it continues, and therefore Complainant is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Complainant also asserts that its suggested civil 

penalty should be adopted. Respondent's answer in opposition argues that, drawing all 

inferences in favor of the non-moving party, as the undersigned must, genuine issues of 

fact indeed remain for hearing. 

I find thai genuine issues of fact exist and Complainant is not entitled to judgment 

as a matter of law. Therefore, Complainant's Motion is DENIED. The matter will 

proceed.' 

' 1 also am mindful of the Administrator's tenet that cases should be decided on the merits rather than on 

the pleadings whenever possible. Sec Safety Equipment and Sign Co.. Ltd.. FAA Order No. 92-76. p. 5. 

1992 FAA Lexis 280 (December 21, 1992), dfed in Larry's Flying Scmce. FAA Order No. 98-4 (March 

12, 1998). 
s o ORDERED. 

Attachment - Service List 

i-cMOX^ =SRichard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FDMSNo. FAA-2011-0683 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: f^earing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

John C. Doubek, Respondent's Counsel 

Doubek & Pyfer, LLP 

307 North Jackson 

P.O. Box 236 

Helena, MT 59624 

TEL: 406-442-7830 

FAX: 406-442-7839 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW. 

Kenton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable RichardC. Goodwin, Administradve Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Adniinistralioii, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000. Washington, DC 20591; Altenlion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
#### COM. v. NEWSUAN, D.

2523 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/11/2017

CP-51-CR-0009215-2008 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7117

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY BUTTS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-57-N, CA-97-1161-2) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Anthony Butts, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Anthony Butts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant’s unverified assertion that he had filed the identical motion on April 3, 1997, is belied by the record. Appellant’s § 2255 motion indicated that he had notfiled any previous motions for post-conviction relief. In addition, his claim that the untimely motion was a mere copy of the filing he made in April 1997, is refuted by the motion itself which is dated November 24, 1997. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceedin forma pauperis but deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Butts , Nos. CR-89-57-N; CA-97-1161-2 (E.D. Va. May 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00229-CV

TEXAS P.M.R., INC. and John Ripley,

Appellants

v.

Robert RIPLEY and Mary Guzman,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-23830

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the Order Denying Plaintiffs’ First 

Amended Application for Injunctive Relief is AFFIRMED. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed 

solely against Appellant John Ripley. 

SIGNED December 18, 2019.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60210

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSVALDO TORRES-SOSA, also known as Roberto Magallon-Salgado,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:13-CR-23-3

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Osvaldo Torres-Sosa pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to 

possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. 

He argues that the district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 

11(b)(1)(D) and deprived him of due process by failing to advise him at

rearraignment that he had the right to appointed counsel if he could not afford 

an attorney to replace his retained counsel.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 7, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60210 Document: 00514632516 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2018
No. 15-60210

2

Because Torres-Sosa did not object to any error under Rule 11, plain 

error review applies to the issue of whether the district court violated Rule 

11(b)(1)(D). See United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59-62 (2002). A Rule 11 

violation is harmless error unless it affects a defendant’s substantial rights. Id. 

at 58; Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(h). To obtain a reversal of his conviction based on 

plain error under Rule 11(b)(1)(D), Torres-Sosa “must show a reasonable 

probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea.” United 

States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004).

Any error under Rule 11(b)(1)(D) did not affect Torres-Sosa’s substantial 

rights. He was advised of his right to appointed counsel during his initial 

appearance, received appointed counsel before obtaining retained counsel,

advised the court at rearraignment, before pleading guilty, that he wished to 

proceed with his retained counsel and had no complaints about counsel’s 

representation, and thereafter waived his trial rights, admitted his guilt, and 

stated that he was voluntarily pleading guilty and accepting the plea 

agreement. See Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. at 83.

Given those circumstances, as well as the absence of any assertion by 

Torres-Sosa that he was unable to pay his current retained counsel, there also 

was no denial of any right of Torres-Sosa to counsel of his choice, no abuse of 

discretion in the denial of retained counsel’s motion to withdraw, and no abuse 

of discretion under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(c). See United 

States v. Austin, 812 F.3d 453, 455-56 (5th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-60210 Document: 00514632516 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2018
No. 12-6530.

#### Smith v. Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa*
      *1023
      *pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin*v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals,*506 U. S. 1 (1992) *{per curiam).*
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1044]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Name of Agency: Postal Rate Commission.

Time and Date: 10:30 a.m., January 29, 1998.

Place: Commission Conference Room, 1333 H Street, NW, Suite 3003, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Issues in Docket No. MC97-5.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen L. Sharfman, General 
Counsel, Postal Rate Commission, Suite 300, 1333 H Street, NW, 
Washington, DC 20268-0001, (202) 789-6820.

    Dated: January 9, 1998.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1044 Filed 1-12-98; 11:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-4005

_____________________________

PATRICE KERR,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

January 14, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the 

merits.

ROWE, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Patrice Kerr, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Respondent.
No. 12-6786.

#### Ferranti *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Imports  (Million Cubic Feet)          
|                                                        
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Imports  (Million Cubic Feet)          
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           | 1,032,903 | 959,285   | 953,008   | 963,768   | 1,011,002 | 965,545   | 1,253,383
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 984,767   | 903,949   | 933,336   | 918,407   | 843,060   | 949,715   | 750,449   | 992,532   | 1,293,812 | 1,381,520
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,532,259 | 1,773,313 | 2,137,504 | 2,350,115 | 2,623,839 | 2,841,048 | 2,937,413 | 2,994,173 | 3,152,058 | 3,585,505
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3,781,603 | 3,976,939 | 4,015,463 | 3,943,749 | 4,258,558 | 4,341,034 | 4,186,281 | 4,607,582 | 3,984,101 | 3,751,360
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,740,757 | 3,468,693 | 3,137,789 | 2,883,355 | 2,695,378 | 2,718,094 | 3,006,497 | 3,033,226 | 2,888,847 | 2,741,717
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,551,175 | 2,807,961 | 3,024,160 | 2,929,286 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024