alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 12-415.

#### Moss, Individually and as Guardian of His Minor Child, et al. *v.*Spartanburg County School District Seven.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Colorado Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Colorado Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 9     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 10     | 10     | 10     | 10     | 10     | 11     | 10     | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 10     | 10     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Stephen ALLEN and Megan E. Allen, Appellants, v. CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST INC., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-10, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1962

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Eli Breger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20-2017-CA-002979-XXXXMB-AW.

Affirmed.
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOR' K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTIC1

The Honorable Dana DeBeauvoir

Civil County Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P.O.Box 149325

Austin, TX 78714

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number:

Trial Court Case Number:

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

March-572015

03-04-00710-CR

613305

^

cr»

.

-.

ro

• .

XT

<

Style: David Alan Price

v. The State of Texas

Dear Honorable Dana DeBeauvoir:

The Third Court of Appeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning

the following original exhibits:

State's exhibit 3 (video tape).

Very truly yours,

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk
#### State v. Whistler

110,595

110,596

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 95 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 95

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2011

Mr. Rogers of Kentucky introduced the following joint resolution; which 
                       was considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-36) is further amended by 
striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 
23, 2011''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

Certification
of CFO Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John D. Waters, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
Floridian Financial Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting

|      |                              | 
|----- | ---------------------------- | 
|By:   | /s/ John D. Waters           | 
|      |                              | 
|      | John D. Waters               | 
|      | Executive Vice President and | 
|      | Chief Financial Officer      | 
|      |                              | 
|Date: | March 25, 2010               | 

---
#### Toni KELLY, Appellant, v. NU IMAGE CLAIMS, INC., Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-3795

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 8, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John E. Duryea, Jr., Judge.

Affirmed.
#### Bidier COLAS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-1164

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 24, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-14574

Dismissed.
No. 12-6347.

#### Jackson *v.*Barrow, Warden.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
1

The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable J.

Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2399

___________

Anthony A. Nelson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Marty Montgomery, Sheriff; H. Bryan, * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Detention Officer, Faulkner County *

Sheriff Department; M. Goss, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Detention Officer, Faulkner County *

Sheriff Department, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 4, 2001

 Filed: December 7, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Nelson appeals from the district court's1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of his constitutional

rights while he was a pretrial detainee. Upon de novo review, see Larson v. City of
-2-

Fergus Falls, 229 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2000), we affirm the result reached by the

district court for the reasons given in its order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
KAREN GRUBB, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 32,071 4 NEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER, LLC , 5 f/k/a New Mexico Oncology Hematology 6 Consultants, and MIKAL SMOKER, P.A., 7 and MIKAL SMOKER, individually, 8 Defendants-Appellees. 9

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 10 Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge 11 James A. Mungle, P.A. 12 James A. Mungle 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 Allen, Sheperd, Lewis, Syra & Chapman, P.A. 16 Ben M. Allen 17 Christopher R. Reed 18 Albuquerque, NM 19 for Appellee New Mexico Cancer Center 20 Hinkle, Hensley, Shanor & Martin, L.L.P. 212 William P. Slattery 1 Dana S. Hardy 2 Santa Fe, NM 3 for Appellee Mikal Smoker 4 MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 KENNEDY, Judge. 6 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 8 been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 9 DISMISSED. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

_______________________________ 12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 13

WE CONCUR: 14

___________________________ 15 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 16

___________________________ 17 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 18
Exhibit 10.3 Debt Purchase Agreement


Exhibit 10.3




DEBT PURCHASE AGREEMENT




This Debt Purchase Agreement (“Debt Purchase Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of March 13, 2012 by and among Gary B. Wolff (“GBW”), Dale S. Pearlman. and HPC POS System, Corp. (“HPC ”).




WHEREAS, the parties to this Debt Purchase Agreement desire to modify that a certain promissory note dated May 1, 2009 (the “Promissory Note”) executed between GBW and HPC by selling, assigning, transferring and conveying the rights and interests to partial payment of the Promissory Note in the amount of fifty thousand ($50,000) dollars since reduced to $10,600 from GBW to Dale S Pearlman.




NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




1.

Transfer and Assignment. As permitted by HPC, GBW hereby sells, assigns, tranfers, and conveys unto Dale S Pearlman its rights and interests to receive payments in the amount of $5,000 under the Promissory Note.  The remaining rights and interests in the balance of the Debt, if any, will remain with GBW.




2.

Consideration. Consideration to be paid to GBW shall be a total of $5,000




3.

Agreement to be bound. HPC POS agrees to be bound by all the terms and conditions applicable to GBW under the Debt.




4.

Entire Agreement. This Debt Purchase Agreement embodies the entire agreement between GBW and Dale S. Pearlman and supersedes any prior agreements, whether written or oral with respect to the subject matter thereof.




5.

Successors. This Debt Purchase Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the parties to this Debt Purchase Agreement and each of their respective successors and assigns.




6.

Counterparts. This Debt Purchase Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original as against any party whose signature appears thereon and all of which together shall constitute one instrument.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Debt Purchase Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first written above.




			
	 
	 

	Gary B. Wolff, P.C.


	 


	/s/ Gary B. Wolff

	 


	Name: Gary B. Wolff


	Its: President and Sole Owner


	Reliance Capital Group Corp.


	 


	/s/ Dale S. Pearlman

	 


	By: Dale S. Pearlman




ACCEPTED, ACKNOWLEDGED AND APPROVED


	


HPC POS System, Corp.


	 


	/s/ Melvin W. Coles

	 


	Name: Melvin W. Coles


	Its: President
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00529-CV

American Contractors Indemnity Company, d/b/a Texas Bonding Company, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10-376-C277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2)(B). They represent that they have reached a Rule 11 agreement to settle this matter and

request that we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case

to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement. We grant the motion,

set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial

court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2)(B).
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Vacated and Remanded on Joint Motion

Filed: April 22, 2011

2
No. 11-1459.

#### Vargas et al. *v.*City of Salinas, California, et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 6th App. Dist. Motions of Pacific Legal Foundation and Californians Aware et al. for leave to file briefs as *amici curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 20562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11047]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

36 CFR Parts 1190 and 1191


Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas; Meeting of 
Regulatory Negotiation Committee

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Regulatory negotiation committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) has established a regulatory negotiation committee to 
develop a proposed rule on accessibility guidelines for newly 
constructed and altered outdoor developed areas covered by the 
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Architectural Barriers Act. 
This document announces the dates, times, and location of the next 
meeting of the committee, which is open to the public.

DATES: The committee will meet on: Monday, May 18, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.; Tuesday, May 19, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; Wednesday, 
May 20, 1998, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and Thursday, May 21, 1998, 8:30 
a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The committee will meet at the National Center on 
Accessibility, Bradford Woods, Griffith Hall, 5020 State Road 67 North, 
Martinsville, Indiana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Greenwell, Office of Technical 
and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers 
Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC, 
20004-1111. Telephone number (202) 272-5434 extension 34 (Voice); (202) 
272-5449 (TTY). This document is available in alternate formats 
(cassette tape, braille, large print, or computer disc) upon request. 
This document is also available on the Board's web site (<a href="http://
www.access-board.gov/rules/outdoor.htm">http://
www.access-board.gov/rules/outdoor.htm</a>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In June 1997, the Access Board established a 
regulatory negotiation committee to develop a proposed rule on 
accessibility guidelines for newly constructed and altered outdoor 
developed areas, including trails, camping and picnic areas, and 
beaches, covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act and the 
Architectural Barriers Act. (62 FR 30546, June 4, 1997). The committee 
will hold its next meeting on the dates and at the location announced 
above. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting site is 
accessible to individuals with disabilities. Individuals with hearing 
impairments who require sign language interpreters should contact Peggy 
Greenwell by May 8, 1998, by calling (202) 272-5434 extension 34 
(voice) or (202) 272-5449 (TTY).
Lawrence W. Roffee,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 98-11047 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1113 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit discrimination on the 

basis of unemployment status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia (for himself, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mr. TOWNS, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. NORTON, Mr. RANGEL, 

Mr. CLARKE of Michigan, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

WEINER, Mr. SERRANO, and Mr. HASTINGS of Florida) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to prohibit 

discrimination on the basis of unemployment status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Employment Act 

5 of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 

8 2000e–1, et seq.) is amended— 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1113 IH

1 (1) in section 701 by adding at the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(o) The term ‘unemployment status’ means being 

4 unemployed, having actively looked for employment during 

5 the then most recent 4-week period, and currently being 

6 available for employment.’’, 

7 (2) in section 703— 

8 (A) in the heading by striking ‘‘OR NA9 TIONAL ORIGIN’’ and inserting ‘‘NATIONAL ORI10 GIN, OR UNEMPLOYMENT STATUS’’, and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘or national origin’’ each 

12 place it appears and inserting ‘‘national origin, 

13 or unemployment status’’, 

14 (3) in section 704(b) by striking ‘‘or national 

15 origin’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘national 

16 origin, or unemployment status’’, 

17 (4) in section 706(g)(2) by striking ‘‘or national 

18 origin’’ and inserting ‘‘national origin, or unemploy19 ment status’’, and 

20 (5) in section 717 by striking ‘‘or national ori21 gin’’ and inserting ‘‘national origin, or unemploy22 ment status’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                April 14, 2008 | /s/                Dennis Tan                           |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Dennis                Tan, President and CEO (Principal |
|                                 | Financial                Officer)                       |

----
No. 12-274.

#### Apex 1 Processing, Inc. *v.*Edwards.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.