alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Iowa Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Iowa Natural Gas Count of Underground Storage Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 10     | 4      | 4     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4      | 4     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. SELLERS, S.

1122 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-28-CR-0000339-2014

(Franklin)

Affirmed
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Louisiana Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Louisiana Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,661,061 | 1,569,190 | 1,495,478
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,536,725 | 1,219,013 | 1,341,444 | 1,233,505 | 1,281,428 | 1,254,370 | 1,217,871 | 1,289,421 | 1,238,661 | 1,189,744
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,354,641 | 1,420,264 | 1,482,343 | 1,396,261 | 1,423,424 | 1,470,354 | 1,591,882 | 1,593,181 | 1,738,734 | 1,834,142
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,810,716 | 1,753,246 | 1,959,688 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
June 10, 2015

Mr. Robert Barber 2208 Hedgeapple Road Plattsmouth, NE 68048

Dear Mr. Barber:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 27, 2015, exempti on request into the public docket (No. FAA

− 2015

− 0811), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with th e requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR fr om which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         158,782
<SECURITIES>                                    29,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                  531,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               719,485
<PP&E>                                       1,178,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,897,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,718,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,885
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,816,956)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,897,593
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,506,117
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (20,297)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,526,414)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### CO docket--OMB Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/28/2011 04:07 PM 

### Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664 Mailcode: C404-05 ----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/28/2011 04:06 PM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_ J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nealson Watkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lewis Weinstock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/28/2011 04:05 PM Subject: Map showing near-road sites for CO monitors 

### Christine, Attached please find the CO monitoring maps you requested during the briefing today. Thanks. Lydia 1. There is a map and list of sites on our public web site: http://www.epa.gov/air/carbonmonoxide/actions.html# j an11 2. Here are the pdfs from the web site : Proposed CO Sites - CBSAs.pdf Proposed CO Sites - CBSAs.pdf Proposed CO Sites - CBSA list.pdf Proposed CO Sites - CBSA list.pdf
#### COM. v. KING, D.

991 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/11/2017

CP-02-CR-0007915-2015

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. ALI, M.

135 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/11/2017

CP-51-CR-0000683-2008

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00486-CV

Elgin TRACY, Adolph Tracy, and Travis Morgan,

Appellants

v.

Edward W. CHAMRAD Jr.,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-05-0240-CVW

Honorable Russell H. Wilson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

this appeal are taxed against Appellants Elgin Tracy, Adolph Tracy, and Travis Morgan.

SIGNED September 16, 2015.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Exhibit
23.1











Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have
issued our report dated March 30, 2009, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Betawave
Corporation, a Nevada corporation formerly known as GoFish Corporation, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Betawave Corporation
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-157352) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-156791 and
333-152656).








/s/
Rowbotham and Company LLP





San
Francisco, California


March 30,
2009
441P16

#### State v. Marian Olivia Curtis

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-458)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 12/06/2016

2. Allowed

3. Allowed
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019132EN.01004601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 132/46 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9293 — Iconex/Hansol Denmark/R+S Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 132/10)

1.

On 1 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019132EN.01004601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Iconex LLC (‘Iconex’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Hansol Denmark ApS and all subsidiaries, including Schades A/S, (‘Hansol Denmark’, Denmark), controlled by Hansol Paper Co. Ltd (‘Hansol Paper’, South Korea), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | R+S Group GmbH (‘R+S Group’, Germany), controlled by Hansol Paper Co. Ltd (‘Hansol Paper’, South Korea). |

Iconex acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Hansol Denmark and R+S Group (together the ‘Target Companies’) by way of purchase of shares.

The concentration has been referred to the Commission by the Bundeskartellamt pursuant to Article 22(3) of the Merger Regulation. The referral was subsequently joined by the French Republic.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Iconex: conversion and supply of lightweight thermal paper (‘LWTP’) for various end-products including receipt paper rolls, printer consumables and self-adhesive labels. Iconex supplies converted rolls and converted labels to a wide variety of industries,

—   for Hansol Denmark: conversion and supply of LWTP for various end-products including receipt paper rolls, and self-adhesive labels. Hansol Denmark supplies converted rolls and converted labels to a wide variety of industries,

—   for R+S Group: conversion and supply of LWTP for receipt and ticket applications, and self-adhesive labels. R+S Group supplies converted rolls and converted labels to a wide variety of industries.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9293 — Iconex/Hansol Denmark/R+S Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019132EN.01004601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 60,750  | 82,991  | 75,745 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 80,824  | 137,709 | 130,336 | 112,339 | 112,174 | 126,360 | 111,259 | 117,230 | 119,706 | 113,582
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 114,295 | 74,407  | 73,028  | 78,280  | 78,323  | 78,178  | 80,432  | 84,914  | 88,654  | 91,693 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 84,130  | 86,701  | 91,392  | 89,478  |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2006-001
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-11192 (Summary Calendar)

__________________

BOBBY WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT; WILLIAM WHITE; ROBERT CHANCE; WILLIAM GONZALES; SHIRLEY HAINES,
Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 2:95-CV-315)

- - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bob by Watson argues that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous. Watson argues

that his complaint was dismissed without affording him the
opportunity to amend his complaint.

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district

court, and the brief, and find that the dismissal of the complaint2

as frivolous should be affirmed substantially for the reasons
stated by the district court. S ee Watson v. Scott , No. 2:95-CV-315
( N.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 1995). Because Watson has not alleged an

arg uable constitutional claim or asserted the existence of any

further facts which would have sustained an arguable claim, the

district court did not abuse its di scretion in dismissing the
complaint without affording Watson the opportunity to amend. See
Graves v. Hampton , 1 F.3d 315, 319-20 (5th Cir. 1994).

Watson argues for the first time on appeal that the defendants

executed a clipper-shave policy that discriminated against bl ack

inmates suffe ring from pseudofolliculitis barbae. The court

declines to exercise its discretion to review Watson's claim that

the implementation of a new clipper-shave pass policy discriminated
against black inmates because the issue inv olves fact questions

which were not addressed in the district court. S ee U nited States
v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 118 (1995); Highlands Ins. Co. v. National

Union Fire Ins. Co. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994), cert.
denied , 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995)).

AFFIRMED.