alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

     (a) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   August 9, 2006                        /S/     CHARLES E. HURWITZ
                                                      Charles E. Hurwitz
                                                      Chief Executive Officer

     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
# C_2019419EN.01000601.xml

| 12.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 419/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 419/6

---

Council Conclusions on the Future Of Civil Justice Cooperation

(2019/C 419/02)

1.

The Council underlines the importance of civil justice cooperation for citizens’ and companies’ everyday life and recalls the commitments taken with the Tampere conclusions and Stockholm Programme. The Council stresses that for carrying out the objectives of the Strategic Agenda 2019-2024 further reflection on the civil justice cooperation acquis is required. In terms of future action, the Council emphasises the need to prioritise effective implementation, enforcement, evaluation of application and functioning of existing EU instruments as well as digitalisation. The existing EU legal framework should be as user friendly as possible. Any new legislative initiatives must be based on evidence of clear added value and of practical needs of citizens and businesses. Where the initiatives aim at harmonising substantive civil law they should not unnecessarily impede on well-functioning national legal frameworks already in place.

2.

The Council recalls that, in order to ensure coherence and consistency of the civil justice cooperation acquis, legislative proposals in the civil law area should be properly coordinated and fragmentation should be avoided not only in the negotiation process but also later in the process of implementation.

3.

The Council stresses the key role of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters and the European e-Justice Portal in implementation and application of legislation and invites the Commission and Member States to use their best efforts to enhance the visibility and use of these tools amongst practitioners. Recalling the importance of e-CODEX, the Council invites the Commission to consider all options, legislative and non-legislative, to ensure its long-term sustainability and management.

4.

The Council recalls that a multilateral approach is an essential element of international cooperation also in the field of civil justice. The Council expresses its support to the key multilateral organisations in the field: the Hague Conference on Private International Law, UNCITRAL and UNIDROIT. For particular cases where multilateral cooperation is not an option, the Council invites the Commission to present effective alternatives to cater for citizens’ and companies’ needs.

---
DEVAL L. PATRICK 

Governor 

TIMOTHY P. MURRAY 

Lieutenant Governor 

October 23, 2009 

Mr. David Conroy 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

One Congress Street 

Boston, MA 02114-2023 

Dear Mr. Conroy : 

IAN A. BOWLES 

Secretary 

LAURIE BURT 

Commissioner 

In January 2008, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) 

submitted to your office the final Massachusetts State Implementation Plan to Demonstrate 

Attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for Ozone (the Ozone SIP). 

We are submitting technical revisions to that submittal to incorporate minor changes in base year 

and projection year inventories . 

The Ozone SIP included a Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) demonstration, which showed that 

from 2002 through 2008, emissions of ozone precursors were projected to decrease in 

Massachusetts' two nonattainment areas by a significantly greater percentage than the 15% 

reduction required to demonstrate RFP in accordance with EPA's rules and guidance . 

Your staff brought to our attention that our RFP analysis did not take into account the emission 

reduction credits (ERCs) issued to stationary sources pursuant to MassDEP regulation 310 CMR 

7.00, Appendix B - Emission Banking, Trading and Averaging. In response, we have made 

technical revisions to the 2002 base year and future year projections to account for unused ERCs 

in those years . The inclusion of ERCs in the RFP analysis results in only minor changes to the 

2008 emissions estimates in the original RFP submittal . 

This information is available in alternate format. Call Donald M. Gomes, ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057 . TDD# 1-866-539-7622 or 1-617-574-6868. 

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500 

MassDEP on the World Wide Web: http://www .mass.gov/dep 

Q* Printed on Recycled Paper 
Technical revisions to incorporate the inclusion of ERCs in the 2002 base year and projected 

inventories have been made to the following sections of the Ozone SIP, which are enclosed: 

" Section 2: Emissions Inventories - Table El- 1 and Figures 2.1 and 2.2 

" Section 4: RFP Demonstration - Tables RFP 1, 2 and 3 . 

" New Appendix 4c - Point Source ERCs 

If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact Ken Sandal on my staff. 

Barbara Kwetz, Dire 

Planning and Evaluation Divisj 

Bureau of Waste Prevention 

Enclosures
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

M. D. BITER, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 15448

D.C. No. 1:13

- cv

- 00747

- SAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Stanley Albert Boone, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 12, 2018 **

Before: RAWLINSON, CLIFTON and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Jamisi Jermaine Calloway , a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from

the magistrate judge’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

constitutional claims. We have juris d iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W e review de

novo whether the magistr ate judge validly entered judgment on behalf of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

* * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 25 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 15448

district court. Allen v. Meyer , 755 F.3d 866, 867

- 68 (9th Ci r. 2014). We vacate

and remand.

Calloway consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636 (c). The magistrate judge then screened and dismissed Calloway ’s action

before the named defendants had been served. See 28 U.S.C. § § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

,

1915A

. Because all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to

proceed before the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, Williams v. King , 875

F.3d 500, 503

- 04 (9th Cir. 2017), we vaca te the magistrate judge’s judgment and

remand for further proce edings.

VACATED and REMANDED.
Company sanitized 

Does not contain Confidential Business 

Information (CBI)

Appendix D 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content
2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content 

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information: 

 

 Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant(oligomeric)_______

 

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals 

 identified in Section IV below and year of production): 

All products under the name of “Fluorinated Surfactant (Oligomeric)” are 

considered to be precursors to PFOA and higher homologues.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information: 

 

 Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

 

 Site location:3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

 :2276-2,Nada,Hirai,Kashima City,Ibaraki,314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information 

submitted: 

 Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka 

 Phone: _+81-467-82-4398____

 Address: 3-2-10,Chigasaki,Chigasaki City,Kanagawa,253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2013 

(Data reported in the report are equal to data based on year end run rate.)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site: 

 

 Imported ___0____kgs/yr 

 

 Manufactured _0_kgs/yr
IV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS 

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For 

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates. 

 No manufacturing activity.

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS 

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available 

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including 

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties 

and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 21, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. The K&Z Company LLC, Brooklyn, New York; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring at least 51 percent, but no more than 75 
percent, of the voting shares of The First National Bank of Lisbon, 
Rochester, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Paul Kaboth, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Hometown Bancshares, Inc., Middlebourne, West Virginia; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of Union Bank of Tyler County, Middlebourne, West Virginia.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Maria Villanueva, Manager 
of Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, 
San Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Jefferson State Bancorp, Medford, Oregon; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bank 
of Southern Oregon, Medford, Oregon.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 21, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-10993 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50593 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANDREW HIDALGO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 591

- 1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Andrew Hidalgo appeals his guilty plea conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He relies on United States v. Lopez , 514 U.S. 549 (1995), to argue that § 922(g)(1) unconstitutionally extends federa l control to the mere non

- commercial possession of a firearm. Hidalgo contends that a felon’s possession of a firearm, like possession of a firearm near a school, the offense at issue in Lopez , does

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 3, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50593 Document: 00514942605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2019No. 18

- 50593

2 not have a sufficient nexus to interstate commerce. He concedes, however, that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, and he raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance; in the alternative, it requests an extension of time to file its brief. The Government agrees with Hidalgo that, under circuit precedent, Hidalgo’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g) (1) is foreclosed. Summary affirmance is proper where, among other instances, “the position of one of the

pa rties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case . . . .” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). “This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constituti onality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De Leon , 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999); see United States v. Alcantar , 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 2013). In United States v. Rawls , 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996), we rejected
a cha llenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) on the basis that neither the holding nor the reasoning in Lopez constitutionally invalidates § 922(g)(1). In view of the foregoing, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’ s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED AS MOOT . The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-50593 Document: 00514942605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2019
Grace River Ranch, L /s



# Fourth Court **of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

March 20, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00127

- CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC, et al, Appellant

v.

GRACE RIVER RANCH , L.L.C

., Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas Trial Court No. 13

- 04

- 00108

- CVL Honora ble Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

After due consideration of appellee’s response to appellants’ “Motion for Emergency Stay of Temporary Injunction Challenged in Interlocutory Appeal

, ” the court ’s March 12, 2015 order staying enforcement of the injunctive relief granted in the trial court’s “Partial Summary Judgment” order signed on March 3, 2015 will remain in effect pending resolution of the appeal or further order of the court

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Nebraska Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Nebraska Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 15    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 11     | 12     | 22     | 59     | 87     | 87     | 88     | 91     | 95     | 96    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 98     | 96     | 106    | 109    | 111    | 114    | 114    | 186    | 322    | 285   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 276    | 307    | 299    | 246    | 109    | 140    | 149    | 150    | 153    | 147   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 131    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-010-07-1020-00-241A]


Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The next meeting of the Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council will be held on Thursday, May 7, 1998, at the Colorado 
Northwestern Community College in Rangely, Colorado.

DATES: Thursday, May 7, 1998.

ADDRESSES: For further information, contact Joann Graham, Bureau of 
Land Management (BLM), Grand Junction District Office, 2815 H Road, 
Grand Junction, Colorado 81506; Telephone (970) 244-3037.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Northwest Resource Advisory Council will 
meet on May 7, 1998, at the Colorado Northwestern Community College, 
500 Kennedy Drive, Rangely, Colorado. The meeting will be held in the 
Weise Conference Center and will begin at 9 a.m. Agenda items include 
an update of the roadless inventory review, a discussion about proposed 
statewide recreation guidelines, and subcommittee reports on fire, land 
exchanges, and recreation.
    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make oral 
statements at the meetings or submit written statements following the 
meeting. Per-person time limits for oral statements may be set to allow 
all interested persons an opportunity to speak.
    Summary minutes of council meetings are maintained in both the 
Grand Junction and Craig District Offices. They are available for 
public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within 
thirty (30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Mark T. Morse,
District Manager, Craig and Grand Junction Districts.
[FR Doc. 98-10952 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
 Company
 1.
    
    The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: June 30, 2008
    
    /s/ Delfín Jorge Ezequiel Carballo

Name: Delfín Jorge Ezequiel CarballoTitle: Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                       |                                |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                       | /s/ Barry      Cinnamon   |   |
|   | Barry    Cinnamon                          |                                |
|   | President and Chief Executive      Officer |                                |

----