alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History: Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Missouri Natural Gas Wellhead Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Missouri Natural Gas Wellhead Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0.25   | 0.29   | 0.13  
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0.24   | 0.23   | 0.22   | 0.24   | 0.30   | 0.33   | 0.34   | 0.40   |        |       
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 3.75   | 3.50   | 3.75   | 3.75   | 3.75   | 3.50  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1.57   | 1.32   | 1.56   | 1.57   | 1.49   | 1.70   | 1.56   | 1.70   |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
082A14

#### State v. Sethy Tony Seam

Special Order 08/18/2016

Ervin, J., recused
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1153 

To provide for consultation by the Department of Justice with other relevant 

Government agencies before determining to prosecute certain terrorism 

offenses in United States district court, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. 

GALLEGLY, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

GOWDY, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. ROSS of Florida, and Mr. 

COBLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for consultation by the Department of Justice 

with other relevant Government agencies before determining to prosecute certain terrorism offenses in United 

States district court, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring the Collec5 tion of Critical Intelligence Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR CONSULTATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1153 IH

1 (1) PROSECUTION.—Before any officer or em2 ployee of the Department of Justice institutes any 

3 prosecution of an alien in a United States district 

4 court for a terrorist offense, the Attorney General, 

5 Deputy Attorney General, or Assistant Attorney 

6 General for the Criminal Division, shall consult with 

7 the Director of National Intelligence and the Sec8 retary of Defense about whether the prosecution 

9 should take place in a United States district court 

10 or before a military commission under chapter 47A 

11 of title 10, United States Code. 

12 (2) INTERROGATION.—Before any officer or 

13 employee of the Department of Justice engages in 

14 any interrogation of an alien in a criminal investiga15 tion or prosecution of a terrorist offense, the Attor16 ney General, Deputy Attorney General, or Assistant 

17 Attorney General for the Criminal Division, shall 

18 consult with the Director of National Intelligence 

19 and the Secretary of Defense about how to proceed 

20 in that interrogation so as to enable each such offi21 cial to carry out that official’s responsibilities in a 

22 manner consistent with national security. 

23 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

24 (1) the term ‘‘terrorist offense’’ means any of25 fense for which the defendant could be tried by a 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1153 IH

1 military commission under chapter 47A of title 10, 

2 United States Code; and 

3 (2) the term ‘‘alien’’ means any person who is 

4 not a citizen of the United States. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### COM. v. GETZ, K.

725 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/07/2017

CP-40-CR-0000375-2012

(Luzerne)

Affirmed
Exhibit 32.2






Certification
of the Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of


the
United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Betawave Corporation, a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”), for the year ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), Lennox L. Vernon,
Chief Accounting Officer and Director of Operations of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
March 30, 2009





/s/
      Lennox L. VernonLennox
      L. VernonChief
      Accounting Officer and Director of Operations(Principal
      Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1150-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land were officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m., April 21, 1998.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, the subdivision of sections 22 and 27, and a 
metes-and-bounds survey in section 27, T. 11 N., R. 29 E., Boise 
Meridian, Idaho, Group 984, was accepted April 21, 1998.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the surveys of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho 83709-1657.

    Dated: April 21, 1998.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 98-11584 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
316P16

#### State v. Nathan Lorenzo Holden

Defs *Pro Se*Motion for Writ of Prohibition

Denied
#### COM. v. BRADLEY, R.

2219 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/17/2017

CP-51-CR-0006748-2010

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                                 
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Mississippi Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers - Sales  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 423,397 | 415,673 | 426,352
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 434,501 | 438,069 | 435,146 | 438,861 | 445,212 | 445,856 | 437,669 |         |         |        
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 436,840 | 439,511 | 440,171 | 442,974 | 440,252 | 439,450 | 439,770 | 464,330 | 464,826 | 466,782
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 463,705 | 430,138 | 430,784 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
exh10_295.htm




EXHIBIT 10.29.5







PROMISSORY NOTE


















	
$1,966,840.39

	
January 5, 2012



























Mission West Properties, L.P., Mission West Properties, L.P. I, Mission West Properties, L.P. II, and Mission West Properties, L.P. III (collectively referred to herein as “Mission”)








	
promises to pay to

	
The Berg Group












the principal sum of One Million Nine Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Dollars and 39 Cents ($1,966,840.39),







plus interest at the rate of 30 day LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 5th day of January, 2012.







Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.







Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than January 31, 2012.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.













	
Signed By:

	
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

	  	
1/5/2012


	  	
Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

	  	
Date


	  	
Mission West Properties, Inc.

	  	  
	  	
Its General Partner

	  	  











	
Acknowledged:

	
/s/ Carl E. Berg

	  	
1/5/2012


	  	
Carl E. Berg

	  	
Date
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Utah Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Utah Natural Gas Percentage Total Commercial Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.79   | 0.92   | 0.89   | 0.94   | 0.97   | 1.03   | 1.00  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.98   | 1.02   | 1.07   | 0.97   | 1.00   | 1.15   | 1.20   | 1.14   | 1.19   | 1.19  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1.24   | 1.28   | 1.22   | 1.26   | 1.10   | 1.12   | 1.26   | 1.30   | 1.21   | 1.35  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.40   | 1.34   | 1.36   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Towerstream Corporation, (the “Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’’), I, Jeffrey M. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |  |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |  |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| |  | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2014



| | /s/ Jeffrey M. Thompson                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Jeffrey M. ThompsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Delaware Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Delaware Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 4,410  | 4,215  | 3,665  | 3,594  | 3,030  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co. (the Company) for the quarter ending
September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Glenn A. Kleinert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  November
9, 2004





/s/ Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### COM. v. ENYEART, R.

90 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/19/2017

CP-17-CR-00Q0212-2015

(Clearfíeld)

Affirmed
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that th i s

opinion s h ould not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________ No. 97-10701 (Summary Calendar)

_________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GOBIND DARYANANI,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CR-31-ALL-T) February 3, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gobind Daryanani appeals the sentence that the district court imposed pursuant to his plea agreement for conspiracy to traffic and attempt to traffic in counterfeit goods. Daryanani argues that the district court committed clear error in determining the value of count erfeit merchandise seized and in calculating the value-2-

attributable to counterfeit goods previously sold. We find that the district court did not commit clear error in making these determinations. S ee United States v. Ismoila , 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996) (setting forth the standard for review of loss determination under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1); United States v. Kim , 963 F.2d 65, 69 (5th Cir. 1992). Daryanani a lso argues that the district court committed an

error by failing to give him the three-point reduction pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 2X1.1. In his plea agreement, he waived his right to
conte st the district court’s failure to give him this reduction, but the government has not raised the issue of waiver. Daryanani had a storefront ca lled Dallas Jewelry Findings from which counterfeit goods were sold, and he employed persons to sell these goods. Testimony at the sentencing hearing established that sales of counterfeit goods amounted to 80 percent of the total sales of
D allas Jewelry Findings, and that there were large quantities of counterfeit merchandise in stock awaiting sale. Accordingly, the district court did not commit any error when the court found that it was reasonably certain that there would have been retail sales
of counterfeit goods absent government inter vention. S ee United
States v . Sung , 51 F.3d 92, 95-96 (7th Cir. 1995) (holding that
whether d efendant is eligible for § 2X1.1 reduction depends upon how close defendant comes to compl eting the sale of counterfeit goods). As a result, the district court did not commit any error-3-

by not giving Daryanani the three-point reduction pursuant to § 2X1.1.
AFFIRMED.