alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1053 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1053

To clarify authority granted under the Act entitled ``An Act to define 
the exterior boundary of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation in the 
                State of Utah, and for other purposes''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2011

   Mr. Matheson (for himself and Mr. Bishop of Utah) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify authority granted under the Act entitled ``An Act to define 
the exterior boundary of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation in the 
                State of Utah, and for other purposes''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF AUTHORITY.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to define the exterior boundary of the 
Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation in the State of Utah, and for other 
purposes'', approved March 11, 1948 (62 Stat. 72), as amended by the 
Act entitled ``An Act to amend the Act extending the exterior boundary 
of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation in the State of Utah so as 
to authorize such State to exchange certain mineral lands for other 
lands mineral in character'' approved August 9, 1955, (69 Stat. 544), 
is further amended adding at the end the following:
    ``Sec. 5.  In order to further clarify authorizations under this 
Act, the State of Utah is hereby authorized to relinquish for the 
benefit of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation 
school or other State-owned subsurface mineral lands located beneath 
the surface estate delineated in Public Law 440 (approved March 11, 
1948) and south of the border between Grand County, Utah, and Uintah 
County, Utah, and select in lieu of such relinquished lands, on an 
acre-for-acre basis, any subsurface mineral lands of the United States 
located beneath the surface estate delineated in Public Law 440 
(approved March 11, 1948) and north of the border between Grand County, 
Utah, and Uintah County, Utah.''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Virginia Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Virginia Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,029,161
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,059,259 | 1,077,858 | 1,119,418 | 1,035,590 | 1,025,827 | 1,055,691 | 1,074,350 | 1,120,061 | 1,091,838 | 1,215,366
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,209,209 | 1,155,432 | 1,090,377 | 1,126,447 | 1,127,479 | 1,114,460 | 1,083,979 | 1,182,280 | 1,139,966 | 1,214,463
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,245,106 | 1,224,467 | 1,108,814 | 825,611   | 686,521   | 602,589   | 734,841   | 870,746   | 1,067,190 | 1,397,597
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,493,660 | 1,546,300 | 1,533,127 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. RES. 65 

Honoring the 100th anniversary of Fort McCoy in Sparta, Wisconsin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2009 

Mr. KOHL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 100th anniversary of Fort McCoy in Sparta, 

Wisconsin. 

Whereas 2009 is the 100th anniversary of the Army operating a military installation in Sparta, Wisconsin; 

Whereas the Army began training in Monroe County, Wisconsin, on the 4,000-acre family farm of Robert Bruce 

McCoy in September 1905; 

Whereas the Army purchased the McCoy farm and established the Sparta Maneuver Tract on June 8, 1909; 

Whereas the Sparta Maneuver Tract was officially designated 

Camp McCoy on November 19, 1926, in honor of Major 

General Robert Bruce McCoy; 

Whereas Camp McCoy served as one of the largest and most 

modern artillery camps in the Nation, training field artillery units for deployment in World War I; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•SRES 65 IS 

Whereas Camp McCoy served as a supply base for the Civilian Conservation Corps during the Great Depression, 

supplying uniforms, lodging, and food to thousands of 

young men; 

Whereas Camp McCoy was modernized and expanded to help 

prepare military units for deployment in World War II, 

resulting in the construction of 1,500 buildings capable 

of training and supporting 35,000 troops; 

Whereas Camp McCoy was temporarily an internment camp 

during the Japanese American internment, a period of 

grave injustice to individuals of Japanese ancestry; 

Whereas Camp McCoy served as a prisoner of war camp for 

4 years, housing Japanese, German, and Korean prisoners of war; 

Whereas Camp McCoy served as a major training center for 

the Fifth Army preparing for the Korean War; 

Whereas Camp McCoy was officially renamed Fort McCoy on 

September 30, 1974, recognizing Fort McCoy’s status as 

a year-round Army training facility; 

Whereas Fort McCoy was designated as a Resettlement Center for Cuban refugees, housing approximately 15,000 

Cubans in 1980; 

Whereas Fort McCoy served as a major mobilization site during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, preparing more than 18,000 soldiers for deployment; and 

Whereas Fort McCoy continues to support our Nation’s defense, training more than 100,000 soldiers per year and 

preparing 85,000 military personnel from 49 States and 

2 territories for mobilization since September 11, 2001: 

Now, therefore, be it 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•SRES 65 IS 

1 Resolved, That the Senate honors Fort McCoy in 

2 Sparta, Wisconsin, on its 100th anniversary and com3 mends the men and women who have worked and trained 

4 at the fort. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History: Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|No chart available.                                                             
|No chart available.                                                             
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Vented and Flared   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | NA     |        | NA     | NA     |        | NA     | 0      |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019247EN.01002901.xml

| 23.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 247/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 247/29

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2019/C 247/09)

The Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in blocks G15 and H13 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2014, No 4928).

With reference to the Directive referred to in the preamble and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in blocks G15 and H13 of the Dutch continental shelf.

The Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1) and (2) and 6(2) of the above-mentioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

The Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Policy

attn.: Mr J.L. Rosch, Energy and Environment Directorate

Email: mijnbouwaanvragen@minezk.nl

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will in principle be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr D.A. Hendriks on the following telephone number: +31 703798477.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40066

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO SALINAS-MENDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-359-1

--------------------

August 23, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arturo

Salinas-Mendez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Although Salinas has submitted a letter explaining his actions and

inquiring whether his sentence could be reduced, he has not

presented any arguments in support of his appeal.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
No. 01-40066

-2-

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11612]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 1998 / Notices

[[Page 24151]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


National Advisory Council on Maternal, Infant, and Fetal 
Nutrition; Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., 
this notice announces a meeting of the National Advisory Council on 
Maternal, Infant, and Fetal Nutrition.

DATE AND TIME: May 27-29, 1998, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

PLACE: Food and Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, th Floor 
Conference Room, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will continue its study of the 
Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children 
(WIC) and the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP).
    The agenda items will include the formulation of recommendations 
for the Council's 1998 report to the President and Congress and a 
discussion of general program issues.
    Recommendations for the report may address administrative and 
legislative changes for WIC and CSFP as determined by the Council.

STATUS: Meetings of the Council are open to the public. Members of the 
public may participate, as time permits. Members of the public may file 
written statements with the contact person named below before or after 
the meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Persons wishing additional 
information about this meeting should contact Jackie Rodriguez, 
Supplemental Food Programs Division, Food and Nutrition Service, 
Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 540, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22302. Telephone: (703) 305-2730.

    Dated: April 16, 1998.
Yvette S. Jackson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-11612 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-U
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 98 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of authority to increase 

the debt limit, as submitted under section 3101A of title 31, United 

States Code, on January 12, 2012. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2012 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. SCHILLING, Mr. SAM

JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. WOODALL, and 

Mr. QUAYLE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to increase the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 3101A of title 31, United States Code, on January 12, 2012. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise of 

4 authority to increase the debt limit, as exercised pursuant 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 98 IH 

1 to the certification under section 3101A(a) of title 31, 

2 United States Code. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019102EN.01000202.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.8870 — E.ON/Innogy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 102/04)

On 7 March 2019, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.8870 — E.ON/Innogy, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2045** 

MICHAEL KNIGHTS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. OXFORD GLOBAL RESOURCES, (Contracting Capacity); STIHL INCORPORATED, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); EARL SYKES, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity); GUY WALLACE, (Third Party Beneficially Capacity and Individual Capacity) , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distr ict of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cv - 00260

- RAJ

- DEM )

Submitted : January 10, 2014 Decided: March 7, 2014

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Knights, Appellant Pro Se. Melanie Gayle Augustin, Thomas Joseph Flaherty, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, McLean, Virginia; Sarah Kate McConaughy, Robert W. McFarland, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished op inions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Knights appeals the district court ’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Knights v. Stihl Inc. , No. 2:10

- cv - 00260

- RAJ

- DEM (E.D. Va. July 26, 2013). We grant Knights leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Ervin James FINDLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-4450

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed November 21, 2017.

Rehearing Denied January 10, 2018

Ervin James Findley, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Fla. R. ' App. P. 9.141(d)(5).

WETHERELL, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.