alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.4

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Catherine Hill and Cynthia Scheuer, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: 

(1)  execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an officer and/or director of Mechanical Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder; 

(2)  do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and 

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion. 

The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of this 20th day of December , 2002. 

s/Dale W. Church
Director Compensation Arrangements.



 Exhibit 10.26 
 Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of
the Corporation Upon Initial Election to the Board 
 Each non-employee director of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) is entitled to receive a non-qualified stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock of the Corporation vesting annually over three years and granted on the fifth business day following his or her initial election
to the Board. 
 Annual Compensation of Non-Employee Directors of the Corporation 

Each non-employee director will be entitled to receive an annual retainer in the amount of $35,000 paid in four equal quarterly
installments. The Lead Director will be also entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $35,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director member of the Audit Committee will be entitled to receive an additional
annual retainer of $9,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director member of the Compensation Committee will be entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $6,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each
non-employee member of the Governance Committee will be entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $4,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. The Committee Chairman of the Audit Committee will be entitled to receive an additional
annual retainer of $18,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. The Committee Chairman of the Compensation Committee will be entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $12,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. The Committee
Chairman of the Governance Committee will be entitled to receive an additional annual retainer of $4,000 paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director will also be entitled to receive an equity award having an aggregate
Black-Scholes cash value of $60,000, rounded to the nearest 100 shares, vesting annually in equal installments over three years and granted on the fifth business day following the Corporation’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with such award to
be evidenced by a grant of a non-qualified common stock option covering half of the value of the award and deferred stock awards of restricted stock units covering the remaining half. In addition, non-employee directors are reimbursed for their
expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and Committee meetings.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1159 

To repeal certain provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care 

Act relating to the limitation on the Medicare exception to the prohibition 

on certain physician referrals for hospitals and to transparency reports 

and reporting of physician ownership or investment interests. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2011 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

SESSIONS, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. OLSON, Mr. BARTON

of Texas, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. JACKSON LEE

of Texas, and Mrs. BLACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 

the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal certain provisions of the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act relating to the limitation on the 

Medicare exception to the prohibition on certain physician referrals for hospitals and to transparency reports 

and reporting of physician ownership or investment interests. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1159 IH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PA2 TIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE 

3 ACT. 

4 Effective as of the enactment of the Patient Protec5 tion and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148), sec6 tions 6001 and 10601 (relating to limitation on the Medi7 care exception to the prohibition on certain physician re8 ferrals for hospitals) and section 6002 (relating to trans9 parency reports and reporting of physician ownership or 

10 investment interests) of such Act are repealed, and the 

11 provisions of law amended or repealed by such sections 

12 are restored or revived as if such Act had not been en13 acted. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Huffman v. Huffman

28039

06/05/2017

Affirmed (RAS)
Exhibit 24.8

LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Catherine Hill and Cynthia Scheuer, signing singly, the undersigned's true and lawful attorney-in-fact to: 

(1)  execute for and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned's capacity as an officer and/or director of Mechanical Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), Forms 3, 4, and 5 in accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules thereunder; 

(2)  do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned which may be necessary or desirable to complete and execute any such Form 3, 4, or 5, complete and execute any amendment or amendments thereto, and timely file such form with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or similar authority; and 

(3) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-fact may approve in such attorney-in-fact's discretion. 

The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform any and every act and thing whatsoever requisite, necessary, or proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution or revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact's substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming, nor is the Company assuming, any of the undersigned's responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect until the undersigned is no longer required to file Forms 3, 4, and 5 with respect to the undersigned's holdings of and transactions in securities issued by the Company, unless earlier revoked by the undersigned in a signed writing delivered to the foregoing attorneys-in-fact. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be executed as of this 20th day of December , 2002. 

s/E. Dennis O'Connor
#### State v. Shaw

106,015

05/20/13

Denied.

47 Kan. App. 2d 994
#### MICKMAN, R. v. MICKMAN, E.

1426 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/20/2017

Reargument Denied 9/5/2017

03-06252 (Montgomery)

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JACOB C. YOUNG,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

DARLENE YOUNG,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 37, 2019

§

§ Court Below: Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ File No. C.A. No. 17-37514

§ 

§

§

Submitted: February 14, 2019

Decided: February 18, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to 

the Court that:

(1) On January 25, 2019, the appellant, Jacob C. Young, filed a notice of 

appeal from a Family Court order dated and docketed on November 7, 2018. Under 

Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of appeal should have been filed on or 

before December 7, 2018.

 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

(2) On January 25, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing 

Mr. Young to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. 

In his response to the notice to show cause, Mr. Young attributes the untimeliness 

of his notice of appeal to the fact that he was arrested in April 2018 and his resulting 

need to focus his attention and financial resources on the defense of that matter, as 

well as his unfamiliarity with the legal system as a pro se litigant.

(3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.2 A notice of appeal must be 

received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period in 

order to be effective.3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to 

comply strictly with the jurisdictional requirements.4 Unless an appellant can 

demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to courtrelated personnel, an untimely appeal cannot be considered.5

(4) Mr. Young has not demonstrated that his failure to file a timely notice 

of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. Consequently, this case does not 

fall within the exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice 

of appeal. The appeal must be dismissed.

 

2 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).

3

SUPR. CT. R. 10(a).

4

Taylor v. Powell, 2015 WL 2452916 (Del. May 20, 2015).

5

Id.
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Idaho Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Idaho Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 534,497
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 546,339 | 532,277 | 543,842 | 554,834 | 759,717 | 887,158 | 899,611 | 950,876 | 935,098 | 844,465
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 917,141 | 903,421 | 862,686 | 743,256 | 816,263 | 739,356 | 823,211 | 881,766 | 818,950 | 827,150
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 826,769 | 697,978 | 670,996 | 719,936 | 632,754 | 680,228 | 737,986 | 767,098 | 813,677 | 834,660
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 882,381 | 882,325 | 926,224 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 491 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 491

   Commemorating the 40th anniversary of the May 4, 1970, Kent State 
                         University shootings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2010

    Mr. Brown of Ohio submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Commemorating the 40th anniversary of the May 4, 1970, Kent State 
                         University shootings.

Whereas the year 2010 marks the 40th anniversary of the Kent State University 
        shootings that occurred on May 4, 1970;
Whereas, on May 4, 1970, Ohio National Guardsmen opened fire on Kent State 
        students who were protesting the United States invasion of Cambodia and 
        the ongoing Vietnam War;
Whereas 4 unarmed students (Allison Krause, Jeffrey Miller, Sandra Scheuer, and 
        William Schroeder) were killed and 9 others (Alan Canfora, John Cleary, 
        Thomas Grace, Dean Kahler, Joseph Lewis, Donald MacKenzie, James 
        Russell, Robert Stamps, and Douglas Wrentmore) were injured;
Whereas, in February 2010, the site of the May 4 shootings was entered in the 
        National Register of Historic Places, the official list of the historic 
        places in the United States worthy of preservation;
Whereas, to preserve the memory of the May 4 shootings and encourage inquiry, 
        learning, and reflection, Kent State has established a number of 
        resources, including the May 4 Memorial, individual student memorial 
        markers and scholarships in memory of the 4 students who were killed, an 
        experimental college course entitled ``May 4, 1970 and Its Aftermath'', 
        and an annual commemoration sponsored by the May 4 Task Force; and
Whereas Kent State has engaged the internationally renowned design services 
        firm, Gallagher and Associates, to assist in the development of the May 
        4 visitors' center as a central place where individuals can explore and 
        better understand the May 4 shootings: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate, in commemoration of the 40th anniversary 
of the Kent State University shootings that occurred on May 4, 1970--
            (1) recognizes the tragedy of the May 4 shootings and the 
        implications that the shootings have had not only on Kent State 
        and the local community, but also on the Nation and the world; 
        and
            (2) applauds the development of the May 4 visitors' center 
        as an additional primary resource to preserve and communicate 
        the history of the May 4 shootings, its larger ethical and 
        societal context and impact, and its enduring meaning for our 
        democratic Nation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Nancy D. Parmelee, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May
7, 2004



/s/     Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Gentor Resources, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Lloyd J. Bardswich, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 31, 2009    /s/ Lloyd J. Bardswich   Name: Lloyd J. Bardswich Title:  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.