alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131938 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. MICHELLE COLUMBUS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 131938 COA: 267957 Ingham CC: 04-001440-NO THOMAS L. MOORE, d/b/a SOUTHERN MICHIGAN PAINT & QUARTER HORSE AUCTION COMPANY, and J. R. COVELL, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 20, 2019

s1113 

# Order

Clerk November 20, 2019

159387

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159387

COA: 346866

Macomb CC: 2017

- 002863

- FH

2017

- 002864

- FH

2017

- 002865

- FH

LAVELLE WESLEY SEARCY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of July 2, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the February 13, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal,

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

On remand, that court shall address whether a prosecuting attorney’s office may

unilateral ly block an individual seeking placement in a mental health court from the

“preadmission screening and evaluation assessment” required by MCL 600.1093(3),

which, pursuant to subsection (3)(c) of that statute, must include “[a] mental health

assessment, cli nical in nature, and using standardized instruments that have acceptable

reliability and validity, meeting diagnostic criteria for a serious mental illness, serious

emotional disturbance, co

- occurring disorder, or developmental disability.”
#### Brian Stanley MAURER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-2740

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Willard Pope, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### Sir Michael A. MAPS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s)

CASE NO.: 3D17-0809

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 28, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-8755

Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ GABRIEL TIRADOR                     
|                     |  |  |  | Gabriel Tirador, Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0030

SAT Date: 11/2/2012

Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 PMN

2 1 2 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, IRR/CORROSION-S,E,MM,L, DEVEL, REPRO, NEURO, 

IMMUNO, MUTA, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0030

FATE: 

PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life = min-hr

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)
POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90-99 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt moderate - strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes with reaction of the 

alkoxysilyl groups based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern for irritation and 

possible corrosion from the reactivity of the compound and lung toxicity if inhaled based on the 

alkoxysilyl groups. Concerns for tin are developmental and reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, 

immunotoxicity, and mutagenicity.

 Test Data: (-) for skin sensitization in a mouse local lymph node 

assay

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 4.7

daphnid 48-h LC50 23

green algal 96-h EC50 2.4

fish _ chronic value 0.22

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.26

algal _ chronic 

value

1.8

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions were based on SARs for alkoxysilanes and organo-Sn 

compounds with 16.9% Sn; ecotox chemical class: alkoxysilane - organo-Sn; MW 704; pH 7; 

hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 100% active ingredients; mean measured concentrations; 

and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

22

SARs Alkoxy Silanes & Organotins

SAR Class Alkoxy Silanes & Organotins

Ecotox Category Organotins

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
274P16

#### Michael P. Long and Marie C. Long v. Currituck County, North Carolina and Elizabeth Letendre

1. Respondent’s (Elizabeth Letendre) Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-376)

2. Respondent’s (Elizabeth Letendre) Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Respondent’s (Elizabeth Letendre) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 07/28/2016 Dissolved 09/22/2016

2. Denied

3. Denied

4. Dismissed as moot
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Hawaii Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Hawaii Natural Gas Input Supplemental Fuels  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 3,190  | 2,993  | 2,899  | 2,775  | 2,449  | 2,655  | 2,630  | 2,461  | 2,801  | 2,844 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,817  | 2,725  | 2,711  | 2,705  | 2,831  | 2,793  | 2,761  | 2,617  | 2,715  | 2,752 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,769  | 2,689  | 2,602  | 2,602  | 2,626  | 2,606  | 2,613  | 2,683  | 2,559  | 2,447 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,472  | 2,467  | 2,510  | 2,658  | 2,742  | 2,724  | 2,875  | 2,938  | 3,083  | 3,038 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,205  | 2,639  | 2,820  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
II

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1294

To suspend temporarily the duties on sumatriptan succinate (bulk and dosage

forms).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27 (legislative day, JUNE 30), 1993

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duties on sumatriptan succinate

(bulk and dosage forms).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUMATRIPTAN SUCCINATE (BULK AND DOSAGE

4 FORMS).

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new headings:
2

•S 1294 IS

‘‘ 9902.31.12 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-

N-methyl-1H-indole-5-

methanesulphonamide (1:1)

succinate (sumatriptan succinate-bulk form) (provided

for in subheading

2935.00.46) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95

9902.31.13 3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-

N-methyl-1H-indole-5-

methanesulphonamide (1:1)

succinate (sumatriptan succinate-dosage form) (provided for in subheading

3004.90.60) ........................ Free No change No change On or before

12/31/95 ’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply with respect to articles entered,

3 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
     <CIK>     0000064500
     <NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                  145,992
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,163,436
<ALLOWANCES>                            102,422
<INVENTORY>                           3,354,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      5,783,835
<PP&E>                                1,715,402
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,050,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,174,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,206,403
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 248
<COMMON>                                149,795
<OTHER-SE>                            2,812,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          7,174,629
<SALES>                               9,842,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      9,842,786
<CGS>                                 5,231,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         9,608,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       85,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         149,457
<INCOME-TAX>                             18,008
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     131,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            131,449
<EPS-BASIC>                               (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.07)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Gencor Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ E.J. Elliott                    
|E.J. Elliott                        
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|August 15, 2005                     
|                                    
|/s/ Scott W. Runkel                 
|Scott W. Runkel                     
|Chief Financial Officer             
|                                    
|August 15, 2005
012P17

#### Eli Global, LLC and Greg Lindberg v. James A. Heavner

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based on a Constitutional Question (COA16-186)

2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Pits’ Motion to Dismiss Appeal

1.—.

2. Allowed

3. Allowed
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended September 30, 2008 of Pediment Gold Corp., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ John Seaman

John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



Date: March 30, 2009
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------

<PAGE>

                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP

                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER

                                  CWABS, INC.
                    ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2005-16
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-16

     The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

/s/ Craig Baingo                       Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT


/s/ Kevin Meyers                       Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Nogales, AZ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Nogales, AZ Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 33     | 238   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 271    | 402    | 319    | 289    | 252    | 153    | 74     | 16     | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 34     | 93     | 93     | 106    | 107    | 120    | 35     | 64    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 305    | 184    | 69     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
313P16

#### State v. Lawrence Henry Dawson

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1399)

Denied
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|U.S. Natural Gas % of Total Residential - Sales  (Percent)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 99.9  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 99.2   | 99.2   | 99.1   | 99.1   | 99.1   | 99.0   | 99.0   | 98.8   | 97.7   | 95.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 92.6   | 92.4   | 97.9   | 97.5   | 97.7   | 98.1   | 98.1   | 98.0   | 97.5   | 97.4  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 97.4   | 96.3   | 95.8   | 95.7   | 95.5   | 95.6   | 95.8   | 95.9   | 96.0   | 96.2  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 96.3   | 96.6   | 96.7   | 96.9   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
044P17

#### Edward E Wilkie and Debra T. Wilkie v. City of Boiling Spring Lakes

1. Pits’ Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA16-652)

2. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Defs Motion to Dismiss Appeal

1. -

2. Special Order

3. Allowed