alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Mercury General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ THEODORE STALICK                                        
|                  |  |  |  | Theodore Stalick, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10766]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

April 15, 1998.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before May 26, 1998 to 
be assured of consideration.

Special Request

    In order to conduct the surveys described below at the beginning of 
May 1998, the Department of the Treasury is requesting that the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this information 
collection by April 28, 1998. To obtain a copy of this study, please 
contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance Officer at the address 
listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: M:SP:V 98-007-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1998 941 TeleFile User and Non-user Customer Satisfaction 
Surveys.
    Description: The purpose of the surveys is to obtain feedback from 
businesses on the IRS marketing effort, reasons why businesses used or 
did not use TeleFile, and receive suggestions on how the IRS can 
improve the 941 TeleFile system.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents:

941 TeleFile Non-user Customer Survey--1,400.
941 TeleFile User Customer Survey--1,350.

    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response:

941 TeleFile Non-user Customer Survey--5 minutes.
941 TeleFile User Customer Survey--10 minutes.

    Frequency of Response: Other (one-time only).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 342 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-10766 Filed 4-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 4, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas W. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Douglas W. Dougherty
--------------------------------------
Douglas W. Dougherty
Chief Financial Officer
February 18, 2003
No. 12-6525.

#### Vreeland *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Nevada Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Nevada Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0.42   | 0.44   | 0.43   | 0.43   | 0.51   | 0.66   | 0.61  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0.60   | 0.68   | 0.65   | 0.65   | 0.75   | 0.75   | 0.87   | 0.81   | 0.79   | 0.81  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.82   | 0.86   | 0.89   | 0.85   | 0.69   | 0.80   | 0.90   | 0.93   | 0.84   | 0.96  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.98   | 0.95   | 0.95   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  annual  report of R&R  Acquisition  V, Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period  ending  December 31, 2008 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arnold P. Kling,
President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Dated: March 11, 2009


/s/ Arnold P. Kling
-----------------------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Marysville, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Marysville, MI Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 638    | 5,286  | 3,377  | 691   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,320  | 3,651  | NA     | 811    | 4,455  | 5,222  | 3,483  | 9,158  | 8,756  | 14,925
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 22,198 | 41,964 | 42,866 | 35,273 | 24,583 | 7,208  | 8,695  | 9,160  | 4,437  | 3,453 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,130  | 912    | 2,901  | 2,455  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6406** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the East ern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:98

- cr - 00358

- LMB

- 4; 1:09

- cv - 01008

- LMB )

Submitted : June 24, 2010 Decided: July 1, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per c uriam opinion
. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wilfredo Gonzalez Lor a seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion for an evidentiary hearing as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion and dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. Lora also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) . The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantia l showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s asses sment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lora has not made the requi site showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Lora’s motion to file a formal brief, grant3 the motion to seal his informal appellate brief, and deny the motion to seal his original § 2255 motion and the district court’s order denying it. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9687]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPPTS-44639; FRL-5600-7]

TSCA Chemical Testing; Receipt of Test Data

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's receipt of test data on tertiary 
amyl methyl ether (TAME) (CAS No. 994-05-8). These data were submitted 
pursuant to an enforceable testing consent agreement/order issued by 
EPA under section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). 
Publication of this notice is in compliance with section 4(d) of TSCA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan B. Hazen, Director, 
Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. E-543B, 401 
M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 554-1404, TDD (202) 554-0551; 
e-mail: TSCA-H[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 40 CFR 790.60, all TSCA section 4 
enforceable consent agreements/orders must contain a statement that 
results of testing conducted pursuant to testing enforceable consent 
agreements/orders will be announced to the public in accordance with 
section 4(d).

I. Test Data Submissions

    Test data for TAME were submitted by The American Petroleum 
Institute (API), on behalf of the Tertiary Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) 
Consortium, pursuant to a TSCA section 4 enforceable testing consent 
agreement/order at 40 CFR 799.5000. EPA received the data on March 6, 
1997. The submission includes two final reports entitled 1) 
``Developmental Toxicity Evaluation of Inhaled Tertiary Amyl Methyl 
Ether (TAME) in CD (Sprague-Dawley) Rats'' and 2) ``Developmental 
Toxicity Evaluation of Inhaled Tertiary Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) in CD-
1 Mice.'' This chemical has potentially wide use as a gasoline 
additive.
    EPA has initiated its review and evaluation process for this data 
submission. At this time, the Agency is unable to provide any 
determination as to the completeness of the submission.

II. Public Record

    EPA has established a public record for this TSCA section 4(d) 
receipt of data notice (docket number OPPTS-44639). This record 
includes copies of all studies reported in this notice. The record is 
available for inspection from 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except legal holidays, in the TSCA Nonconfidential Information Center 
(also known as the TSCA Public Docket Office), Rm. B-607 Northeast 
Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, e-mail address: 
[email protected].

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2603.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Test data.

    Dated: April 7, 1997.

Frank Kover,

Acting Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution 
Prevention and Toxics.

[FR Doc. 97-9687 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 23710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11386]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 272

[FRL-6005-6]


Hazardous Waste Management Program: Final Authorization and 
Incorporation by Reference of State Hazardous Waste Management Program 
for Oklahoma

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to incorporate by reference EPA's approval of the 
Oklahoma Department of Environment Quality's (ODEQ) hazardous waste for 
Non-HSWA Cluster VI, RCRA Clusters I, II, III and IV and to approve its 
revisions to that program submitted by the State of Oklahoma. In the 
final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the 
State's request as an immediate final rule without prior proposal 
because EPA views this action as noncontroversial and anticipates no 
adverse comments. A detailed rationale for approving the State's 
request is set forth in the immediate final rule. If no adverse written 
comments are received in response to that immediate final rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If 
EPA receives adverse written comments, a second Federal Register notice 
will be published before the time the immediate final rule takes 
effect. The second notice may withdraw the immediate final rule or 
identify the issues raised, respond to the comments and affirm that the 
immediate final rule will take effect as scheduled. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before June 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to Alima Patterson, Regional 
6 Authorization Coordinator, Grants and Authorization Section (6PD-G), 
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, at the address listed 
below. Copies of the materials submitted by ODEQ may be examined during 
normal business hours at the following locations: EPA Region 6 Library, 
12th Floor, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, Phone number: 
(214) 665-6444; or the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, 
1000 Northeast Tenth Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73117-1212, Phone 
number: (405) 271-5338.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    For additional information see the immediate final rule published 
in the rules section of this Federal Register.
Lynda F. Carroll,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 98-11386 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### COM. v. KELLY, N.

1411 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/16/2017

CP-51-CR-0002679-2014 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
**
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE)**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Banco Macro S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge: 

1. The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. Information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 10, 2019 

 

/s/ Gustavo Alejandro Manriquez
Name: **Gustavo Alejandro Manriquez**Title: **Chief Executive Officer****
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1326

COMMITTEE FOR FAIR BEAM IMPORTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

John R. Shane , Wiley Rein, LLP, of Washingt on, DC, argued for the plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief were Alan H. Price and Christopher B. Weld

.

Donald B. Cameron , Troutman Sanders, LLP, of Washington, DC argued for the

defendant-appellee Hyundai Steel Company. With him on the brief were Julie C.

Mendoza

, Brady W. Mills , and R. Will Planert . Of counsel was Jeffery S. Grimson

.

Marc A. Bernstein , Attorney, Office of the Gener al Counsel, United States

International Trade Commission, of Washin gton, DC, argued for the defendant-appellee

United States. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons , General Counsel, and Neal

J. Reynolds , Assistant General Counsel.

Appealed from: United States C ourt of International Trade

Senior Judge Nicholas TsoucalasNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1326

COMMITTEE FOR FAIR BEAM IMPORTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

HYUNDAI STEEL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade

in CASE NO(S). 06-00125

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge , BRYSON, Circuit Judge , and KENNELLY ∗

District Judge ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: _ January 11, 2007

____ / s /_ _Jan Horbaly

___________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk

∗ Honorable Matthew Kennelly District Jud ge, United States District Court

for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.