alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.24**

 

**Hawaiian Telcom & Accenture CONFIDENTIAL**

 

**Amendment Number Five**

** **

**To Application Services Agreement**

** **

**September 15, 2007**

** **

----

 

**AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE**

** **

**TO APPLICATION SERVICES AGREEMENT**

 

This Amendment Number Five (“Amendment”),effective as of September 15, 2007 (the “Effective Date”), is between HawaiianTelcom Communications, Inc. (“Hawaiian Telcom”) and Accenture LLP(“Accenture”). Accenture and Hawaiian Telcom may be referred to in thisAmendment individually as “Party” and together as “Parties.”

 

The Partiesentered into that certain Application Services Agreement, effective as ofFebruary 5, 2007 (the “Agreement”), which the Parties now desire to amend.

 

The Parties agree to modify and amend theAgreement, as follows:

 

1.     **New Statement of Work:** Exhibit B-7, Infrastructure Management Services, isadded to the Agreement as a new Statement of Work. Exhibit B-7 is attached tothis Amendment as Attachment A.

 

2.     **Defined Terms:** Any terms not defined in this Amendment will have the same meaning asin the Agreement.

 

3.     **Effect of Amendment:**  Unless otherwise amended herein,all terms and conditions of the Agreement, as previously amended, remainunmodified and in full force and effect.

 

*** * * * * * ***

 

*[Balanceof page intentionally left blank; signature page follows]*

 

2

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has beenduly executed by and on behalf of the Parties hereto as of the Effective Date.

 

**HAWAIIANTELCOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**

 
| By:    |   | /s/  Michael S. Ruley    |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                     |
| Name:  |   | Michael  S. Ruley        |
|   |   |                     |
| Title: |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   |                     |
| Date:  |   | October  12, 2007        |

 

 

**ACCENTURELLP**

 
| By:    |   | /s/  Timothy A. Hale |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|   |   |                 |
| Name:  |   | Timothy  A. Hale     |
|   |   |                 |
| Title: |   | Partner              |
|   |   |                 |
| Date:  |   | October  9, 2007     |

 

3

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 33 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA FOR HOLOCAUST DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE CEREMONY.

    The Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on May 17, 
2011, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the

              

 Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out 
in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may 
prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 33

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,985
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,007
<PP&E>                                               3
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)
        

</TABLE>
### 1 A t t ac h m e n t

S o rr y

, r ese n di n g f

o r t h e J o e

. S a r a

F r o m: H ead

, S a r a

S e n t: S u n day

, J u l y 17

, 2 0 11 1 : 2 4 P M

T o: B e c k h a m

. Lisa @ epa m ai l

. epa

. g o v; l apka

. j o e @ epa

. g ov

C c: r ive r a

. s h i r ley @ epa

. g ov

S u bj e c t: F W : G H G

- F o l l o w- u p o n E P A m ee t i n g

L i s a

- Att a c h e d a r e t h e r e s pon s e s t o t h e G H G qu e s

t i on s

, p le a s e le t u s k n o w i f w

e m i s s e d a ny t h i n g f

r o m t h e m e e t i n g.

A s I m e n t i on e d l a s

t w e e k

, w e a r e s t i l l w o r k i n g on t h e r e s

t o f t h e i t e m s

, a nd t ho s

e a r e t ak i n g a b i t m o r

e t i m e bu t w

e e x p ec t

t o h a v e a r e s pon s e t o y ou n e xt w e e k o n t ho s

e

. T h e r e m a i n i n g i t

e m s i n c l ud e 1 ) a s

upp l e m e n t

a l B A f o r F W S r e g a r d i n g t h e

a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s m i s s i o n l i n e a nd po t

e n t i a l r oad s f

o r E R C ; 2 ) a dd i t i ona l a n a l y

s i s r e g a r d i n g t h e N O 2 b a c

k g r oun d f o r t h e 1

- h r

N O 2 N AA Q S a n a l y

s i s; 3 ) a B A C T a n a l y s i s f o r t h e f u g i t i v e du s t i n t h e s o l a r fi e l d ; a nd 4

) s o m e a dd i t i ona l i nfo r m a t i on f o r t h e

g r o w t h a n a l y s i s

, i n c l ud i n g s uppo r t t h a t popu l a t i on n u m b e r s h a v e n o t c h a n g e d s i g n if i c a n t l y i n t h i s a r

e a b e t w e e n t h e 2000

a nd 2010 c

e n s u s

. I f yo u h a d a n e x

a m p le o f t h e gr o w

t h a n a l y s i s t h a t you w

a n t e d u s t o l ook a t

, c

ou l d you p l e a s

e d i r e c t u s t o

t h e l i n k a nd /

o r s e nd i t a s a n a tt

a c h m e n t?

T h a n k s

, S a ra 

### F W : GH G

- F ol l o w

- u p on E P A mee ti n g

H e a d

, S ara

t o:

L is a B ec k h a m

, J o s e ph L a pk a

0 7/ 1 7/2 0 11 01 : 31 P M

Cc :

S h i r l e y R i v er a

H id e D e t a il s

Fr o m : " H ea d

, S ara " < Sa r a

. H ea d@ ae c o m

. c o m>

T o: Li s a Be c k

h a m / R 9 /U S E P A/U S @E P A

, J os e ph L a p k a / R 9 /U S E P A/U S @E PA

Cc : S hi r l e y R iv era

/ R 9/U S E P A /

U S @ E P A

S u p p l eme n t a l GHG B A C T A n a l y s i s f o r P H P P 071511

. pdf 

### P a g e 1 o f 1

7 / 18 / 2011 f il e :// C :\ D o c u m e n t s a nd S e tti ng s \ S R I V E R 02 \ L o c a l S e tti ng s \ T e m p \ no t e s B AAA 25 \

~ w e b89

. ..
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1095 

To sunset Federal laws and regulations which treat the American people 

like children by denying them the opportunity to make their own decision 

regarding control of their bank accounts and what type of information 

they wish to receive from their banks, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To sunset Federal laws and regulations which treat the 

American people like children by denying them the opportunity to make their own decision regarding control of 

their bank accounts and what type of information they 

wish to receive from their banks, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom to Bank 

5 Act’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1095 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUNSET OF FEDERAL LAWS REQUIRING PENALTIES 

2 FOR WITHDRAWALS FROM TRANSACTION OR 

3 TIME ACCOUNTS. 

4 Any provision of any Federal law, other than the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986, that imposes, or requires 

6 the imposition of, any penalty on any consumer for with7 drawing or transferring funds from any transaction ac8 count (as defined in section 19(b)(1)(C) of the Federal 

9 Reserve Act) or any savings or time deposit, and any regu10 lation prescribed under any such law, shall cease to be 

11 effective as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

12 SEC. 3. SUNSET OF FEDERAL LAWS REQUIRING FINANCIAL 

13 INSTITUTIONS TO PROVIDE STATEMENTS OF 

14 ACCOUNTS EXCEPT AT THE REQUEST OF THE 

15 CONSUMER. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the Truth in 

17 Lending Act, the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, the Truth 

18 in Savings Act, and any other provision of Federal law 

19 that requires a creditor, depository institution, or credit 

20 union to provide periodic statements of accounts, after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act, no creditor, depository 

22 institution, or credit union shall be required to provide 

23 periodic statements of account to any customer unless the 

24 customer has notified the creditor, depository institution, 

25 or credit union that the customer elects to receive such 

26 statements. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1095 IH

1 (b) NOTICE TO CONSUMERS OF OPTIONS.—Each 

2 creditor, depository institution, or credit union shall estab3 lish a procedure for notifying customers of their right to 

4 elect to receive statements of account and the method for 

5 implementing such election. If the creditor, depository in6 stitution, or credit union has the capacity to offer state7 ments of account electronically, the creditor, depository in8 stitution, or credit union shall use the notification proce9 dure established under the preceding sentence to make the 

10 consumer aware of the existence of the option to receive 

11 an electronic statement. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### IN THE MATTER OF MARY LUCILLE HUGHES, by and through VIRGINIA HUGHES INGRAM, Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Lucille Hughes, Claim for Compensation Under the North Carolina Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program

No. 87A16

Filed 17 March 2017

Appeal pursuantto N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of adivided panel of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 785 S.E.2d 111 (2016), dismissing an appeal from an amended decision and order filed on 28 April 2015 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission and remanding the matter to the Commission for transfer to the Superior Court, Wake County, pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1-267. l(al). On 9 June 2016, the Supreme Court allowed the State’s petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court on 13 February 2017.

*UNC Center for Civil Rights, by Elizabeth Haddix and Mark Dorosin; andPressly, Thomas & Conley, PA, by Edwin A. Pressly, for claimant-appellant/appellee.*

*JoshuaH. Stein, Attorney General, by Elizabeth A. Fisher, Assistant Solicitor General, and Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellant/appellee State of North Carolina.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *In re*Redmond, _ N.C. _, _ S.E.2d _(Mar. 17, 2017) (No. 86A16), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
#### COM. v. WILLIS, R.

3017 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

7/25/2017

CP-51-CR-1111281-1999

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### TOWER FORTY ONE ASSOCIATION, INC. and Rachel Blass, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH and Caton Owner, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 16-243

Dismissed.
**Supply
      Agreement**





**Party
      A: Anshun Jiujiu Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd. (Consignee)**


**Party
      B: Guizhou Baite Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Consigner)**





Pursuant
      to relevant policies, to avoid repeated construction and overinvestment, Party
      A
      undertakes to do the pre-processing and extraction of all drugs of Party B
      through amicable talks, and reaches the following agreement with Party B in
      accordance with related regulations on entrusted processing.




1.
      Party
      B provides the recipe, production technology, and the quality requirement at
      each key control point in the process of production of the drugs to be
      processed.




2.
      Party
      A takes charge of such works as medicinal material purchase, sorting and washing
      of medicinal materials before use, storage and keeping of middle products,
      and
      transportation of middle products.




3.
      Party
      A may perform the processing in accordance with the production technology
      provided by Party B or with its own production process, provided the quality
      standards required by Party B are met.




4.
      Party
      A shall provide complete production record to Party B, and provide middle
      products meeting the quality requirement of Party B. In case quality problems
      are found with the middle products, Party A shall take corresponding
      responsibilities. For details, the two parties shall hold talks to solve.




5.
      To
      ensure the quality of products, Party B shall assign technicians to carry out
      quality supervision as well as technical guidance throughout the entire
      production process.




6.
      Method
      of price calculation: price shall be calculated on the basis of drug extract,
      at
      35.6 yuan/kg.




7.
      Method
      of payment: to be determined by the two parties through talks.




This
      agreement is made out in duplicate, with Party A and Party B keeping each;
      unstated matters shall be solved through talks.





**Party
      A: Anshun Jiujiu Chinese Medicine Co., Ltd. (Stamped)**


July
      1,
      2005





**Party
      B: Guizhou Baite Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supply Department
      (Stamped)**


July
      1,
      2005
#### Fernando MALDONADO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3474

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Willard Pope, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
396P16

#### Teresa Thompson v. Evergreen Baptist Church

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1031)

Denied
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00496

- CV

Charles Zakarin

v.

World Wide Express §

§

§

§ From County Court at Law No. 1

o f Tarrant County ( 2012

- 002902

- 1 )

March 7 , 2013

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has c onsidered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dism issed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM2 

## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 1 2

- 00 496

- CV

CHARLES ZAKARIN APPELLANT

V.

WORLD WIDE EXPRESS APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 O F TARRANT COUNTY

------------


### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------
Appellant Charles Zakarin filed a notice of accelerated appeal of the trial

court’s December 10, 201 2 order denying his special appearance. See Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)( 7 ) (West 2008 & Supp. 2012 ). Appellee

World Wide Express then filed in the trial court a motion to set aside the order

denying appellant’s special appearance, and appellant filed an emergency

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.3

motion for pr otection in this court, seeking to suspend all actions against him

during the pendency of his accelerated appeal in this court. We granted

appellant’s motion to stay as to all proceedings except for appellee’s motion to

set aside the order denying his spe cial appearance, noting that if the trial court

granted that order, this appeal would be moot.

On February 1, 2013, the trial court granted appellee’s motion to set aside

the order denying appellant’s special appearance. We then sent a letter

informing th e parties that unless any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a

response by February 21, 2013, stating grounds for continuing the appeal, we

wou ld dismiss the appeal as moot.

Although appellant sent a response, it does not explain how this court ca n
continue to exercise jurisdiction without a final judgment or an appealable

interlocutory order. Cf. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7);

Hernandez v. Ebrom , 289 S.W.3d 316, 319 (Tex. 2009) ( “Appeals of some

interlocutory orders become moot because the orders have been rendered moot

by subsequent orders.” ) ; Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex.

2001) (“[T ] he general rule, with a few mostly statutory exceptions, is that an

appeal may be taken only from a final judgment.”). We the refore dismiss this

appeal for want of jurisdiction and lift the stay

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),

43.2(f).4 PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY

, MEIER

, and GABRIEL

, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 7 , 2013
**Exhibit10.c**

 

**Termsof Ronald A. Lowy Individual Award LetterUnder the KRONE Acquisition Key Employee Retention Plan**

 

Pursuant to the Plan, Mr.Lowy is entitled to a severance payment in the event that his employment withthe company is terminated (i) by the company for any reason other than “cause”(as defined in the Plan), (ii) by Mr. Lowy for “good reason” (as defined in thePlan) or (iii) as a result of Mr. Lowy’s death or “disability” (as defined inthe Plan).  The severance will consistof a lump sum cash payment equal to his annual salary at the time oftermination multiplied by two (2).  Mr.Lowy is also entitled to receive continuation of certain health and welfarebenefits for twenty-four (24) months or until he obtains benefits from asubsequent employer, if earlier.  Anyseverance payment made under the Plan shall be in lieu of any severance paymentthat would have otherwise been payable to Mr. Lowy by the company pursuant toany other plan, or individual agreement or arrangement.  As a condition to receipt of any severancebenefits (including the enhanced benefits described below), Mr. Lowy must haveexecuted the Severance Agreement and a General Release in the specified form.

 

In lieu of the severancepayment set forth above, Mr. Lowy is entitled to an enhanced severance paymentif he terminates his employment for “good reason” or his employment isterminated by the company without “cause,” in each case on or prior toNovember 13, 2004.  This enhancedseverance benefit is the same as the severance benefit set forth above, exceptthat the lump sum cash payment will be two (2) times the sum of Mr. Lowy’sannual salary plus his target bonus for that year.  In addition, the company will pay Mr. Lowy a gross–up for anyexcise tax imposed on excess parachute payments under Section 4999 of theInternal Revenue Code.

 

----
No. 12-6059.

#### Emerson *v.*Butts, Superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility.

Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.30



 Exhibit 10.30 
 AMENDMENT TWO TO 
 TERRITORIAL SAVINGS BANK 

SUPPLEMENTAL EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT  
 FOR RALPH NAKATSUKA 
 WHEREAS, Territorial Savings Bank (the
“Bank”), and Ralph Nakatsuka, Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Operating Officer of the Bank (the “Executive”) entered into the Territorial Savings Bank Supplemental Employee Retirement Agreement for Ralph Nakatsuka (the
“SERP”), effective as of October 29, 2008, as amended on March 30, 2011; and 
 WHEREAS, the Bank and
the Executive wish to amend the SERP to provide that income from (i) vesting of restricted stock awards; (ii) exercise of stock option awards; and (iii) dividends on unvested restricted stock under the Company’s 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”) shall not be treated as “Final Average Compensation” for purposes of the SERP; and 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of August 1, 2011. 
 1. Section 1.7 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: 

Final Average Compensation” means the average of the three calendar years of compensation of the Executive immediately
preceding the Executive’s Termination of Employment. For this purpose, the term “Compensation” shall mean the Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 compensation that is subject to tax, excluding any amounts paid on or after Termination of
Employment (e.g., severance pay, unused sick leave, unused vacation) and any bonus other than that paid under the Bank’s approved annual incentive plan regardless of whether or not such bonus is currently included in the Executive’s
taxable income and excluding any income attributable to (i) vesting of restricted stock awards; (ii) exercise of stock options under the Territorial Bancorp Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan; and (iii) dividends on unvested shares of
restricted stock. The term “Compensation” shall include salary reduction amounts contributed by the Bank and not includible in the Executive’s income pursuant to Code Sections 125 and 401(k). 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Bank have signed this Amendment on the dates set forth below. 

 

									
		 		 		 	TERRITORIAL SAVINGS BANK
					
	 August 17, 2011
	 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Kirk Caldwell

	Date	 		 		 	  Chairman, Compensation Committee of the Board
				
	 August 17, 2011
	 		 		 	 /s/ Ralph Nakatsuka

	Date	 		 		 	Ralph Nakatsuka