alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13 - 2 1 - 00 254 - C R COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ NINFA SOLIZ , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________ On a ppeal from the 15 6 th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa Appellant filed a notice of appeal attempt ing to appeal conviction s of smuggling of
persons entered by the 15 6th District Court on August 9 , 2021 . We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction entered on August 9, 2021 . On that same day , a notice of appeal was filed

. Upon review of the2 documents filed, t he trial court has certified that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” without permission of the Court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 25.2(a)(2). On August 16 , 2021, th e Court ordered appellant’s counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant had a right to appeal. On September 27, 2021,
d ue to counsel’s lack of response to the order , the Court abated the matter for the trial
court to determine whether the c ertificate was accurate , whether appellant’s rights are adversely affected by a continued delay, whether appellant wishes to pursue the appeal, and if any order are necessary to ensure the proper and timely pursuit of the appeal. On December 13, 2021, we r eceived a supplemental record containing the trial court’s findings that the trial court certification (the defendant has NO right of appeal) is
accurate , that appellant does not have the permission of the trial court to appeal, and that the record of the hearing clearly shows that the appellant was informed she had no right
to appeal, and that appellant understood the admonishment

. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court ’ s certifi cation does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly , this appeal is
reinstated and dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice
Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed on the 3r d day of February, 2022.
EX-35 (e)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 24, 2007


Banc of America Funding Corporation
214 North Tyron Street
Charlotte, NC 28255


RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Banc of America Funding 2006-A Trust


Per Section 3.20 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 8/1/2004,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

     (a)   a review of the activities of such party during the preceding
           calendar year or portion thereof and of performance of such party
           under this Agreement has been made under such officers' supervision
           and

     (b)   to the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, such
           party has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in
           all material respects throughout such year, or, if there has been a
           failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
           specifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature
           and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Scott Strack
Scott Strack, Vice President


Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         396,372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 396,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   396,372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,529
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,715
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 9 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of 

Performance for Portland Cement Plants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2011 

Mr. CARTER (for himself and Mr. COLE) introduced the following joint 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement 

Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance 

for Portland Cement Plants. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the En4 vironmental Protection Agency relating to the National 

5 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from 

6 the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Stand7 ards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants (pubVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:10 Jan 07, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ9.IH HJ9

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 9 IH 

1 lished at 75 Federal Register 54970 (September 9, 

2 2010)), and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Virginia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Virginia Natural Gas Number of Commercial Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |        |        |        |         | 54,071  | 54,892  | 61,012 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 63,751  | 67,997  | 69,629  | 70,161 | 72,188 | 74,690 | 77,284  | 78,986  | 77,220  | 80,500 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 84,646  | 84,839  | 86,328  | 87,202 | 87,919 | 90,577 | 91,481  | 93,015  | 94,219  | 95,704 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 95,401  | 96,086  | 96,503  | 97,499 | 98,741 | 99,643 | 100,422 | 100,531 | 101,925 | 102,637
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 103,272 | 104,088 | 104,132 |        |        |        |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
324A16

#### State v. Antwan Anthony (DEATH)

Def’s Motion for Stay of Appellate Proceedings in Light of Pending Racial Justice Act Motion

Allowed 02/01/2017
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick Boisvert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 1, 2010





/s/ Patrick BoisvertPatrick Boisvert
Chief Financial Officer
"Harold Coble"

<harold_coble@ncsu.edu>

08/20/2009 09:28 AM

Teung,

Attached are the cost figures for aquatic IPM practices.

harold

IPM practice cost for aquatics

Prevention:

Nutrient buffers: A 50-ft nutrient buffer requires approximately 1.0 acre of land for every 870

feet of shoreline. A 1-acre rectangular pond has 832 feet of shoreline. Nutrient buffer

establishment costs average $150 per acre, so a 1-acre pond would require about $145 for

buffer establishment. A 100-acre rectangular lake would require 9.6 acres of buffer at a cost of

about $1450. Irregular shorelines would increase the cost of buffer establishment.

Monitoring:

Weed survey: Most states have identification services for weed samples sent in to a central lab

for little or no cost. However, when trips to a location to survey and identify weed problems are

required, typical cost is about $100/acre for a small pond or lake, and run as high as $1000/day

for larger lakes requiring full day or longer surveys.

Suppression:

Dredging: Dredging equipment operation typically costs around $400/hour. Two operators

estimated that dredging a 1-acre pond to remove 1 foot of soil would take about 10 hours at a

cost of about $4000. Dredging would not be feasible for large water bodies.

Mechanical harvest: Availability of contract operations is limited, but where available

mechanical harvest of aquatic weeds runs about $1000/hr. A typical operation can remove

weeds from about 1 acre per day at a cost of around $8000.00/acre. These costs make

mechanical removal of aquatic weeds too expensive for most situations. Current cost for

harvesting machines run from $150,000 to $250,000 and annual maintenance is very expensive.

Triploid grass carp: Costs average $10 to $15/fish and 10 fish per acre are recommended for a

cost of $100 to $150/acre. Fish are typically replaced every 5 to 10 years.

Herbicides:
Fluridone $750/acre including application

Imazapyr $750/acre including application

Glyphosate $300/acre including application

Copper $250/acre including application
432P16

#### State v. Robert Leon Gray, III

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Return of Property

Dismissed
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 241   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 356    | 373    | 382    | 385    | 390    | 372    | 370    | 372    | 185    | 300   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 280    | 300    | 225    | 240    | 251    | 316    | 316    | 43     | 45     | 51    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 50     | 40     | 40     | 34     | 36     | 35     | 36     | NA     | NA     | NA    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
387P05-4

#### State v. Earl James Watson

1. Defs Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAPI6-688)

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Catawba County

3. State’s Motion to Strike Reply to State’s Response to Petition for *Writ of Cei'tiorari*

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed

3. Dismissed as moot

Ervin, J., recused
#### David MCCLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1445

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 19, 2017

Rehearing Denied October 30, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Keith A. Carsten, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Port Nikiski, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Port Nikiski, AK Liquefied Natural Gas Exports to Japan  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 67,648 | 62,187 | 65,951 | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019376EN.01004001.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/40

---

Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/40)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.fusionforenergy.europa.eu/aboutfusion/keydocs.aspx

---
189P16

#### State v. Shawn Jarmine Murchison

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-563)

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE MARSHALL INDUSTRIES QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,930)
<INVENTORY>                                    217,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,189
<PP&E>                                          88,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 448,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,666
<BONDS>                                         32,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,279
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   448,883
<SALES>                                        295,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               295,532
<CGS>                                          241,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   806
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,639
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,639
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>