alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24807-24808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1203-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24808]]

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1203-DR), dated February 9, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, effective this 
date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I 
hereby appoint Michael W. Lowder of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared 
disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Dorothy M. Lacey as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-11866 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Unassociated Document


 



Exhibit 10.2


 


As a result of the expiration of the employment agreement in 2011, Mr. Altieri currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carrollton Bancorp and Carrollton Bank (the “Bank”) on at-will basis.  Under the terms of his current employment arrangement, Mr. Altieri is entitled to an annual base salary currently set at $222,300, a bonus in an amount as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and the Board of Directors, and to participate in all employee benefit plans and arrangements as offered by the Bank to all employees and officers and to use of a Bank-owned car.
#### Walker v. State

110,478

08/04/2015

Denied

Unpublished
Summary of Independent Director Compensation Policy



 Exhibit 10.42 
 The Addus HomeCare Corporation (the “Corporation”) independent director compensation policy provides that independent directors receive an annual retainer of $25,000 for service on the
Corporation’s board of directors, $1,500 per in person scheduled board meeting (whether attended in person or telephonically) and $750 per telephonic board meeting. 

The chairmen of the Corporation’s audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee receive
an additional annual retainer of $12,000, $7,500 and $5,000, respectively. Independent directors who serve on the audit committee receive $1,500 per audit committee meeting attended and independent directors who serve on other committees
receive $1,000 per committee meeting attended. Independent directors are also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending board of directors meetings, committee meetings and stockholder meetings. 

In addition, each independent director is entitled to receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Corporation’s common stock
valued at $20,000, which shall be awarded following the Corporation’s annual meeting each year beginning with the Corporation’s 2012 annual meeting. Each grant of restricted stock to an independent director shall vest on the first
anniversary of the date of issuance. Grants of restricted stock made immediately following the 2012 annual meeting will be made pro rata to reflect the partial year, and with a shorter vesting period to reflect the time served during 2011, up until
the 2012 annual meeting. 
 The foregoing independent director compensation is subject to review and adjustment on the
recommendation of the Corporation’s nominating and corporate governance committee.
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History: Annual                                             
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Indiana Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Indiana Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 1,236  | 1,762  | 2,361  | 1,283  | 836    | 494    | 162    | 265    | 244    | 393   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 796    | 922    | 1,188  | 1,582  | 2,733  | 1,554  | 4,571  | 1,867  | 1,102  | 1,418 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,275  | 1,254  | 2,103  | 2,169  | 1,415  | 1,066  | 1,172  | 2,577  | 1,748  | 1,281 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,148  | 989    | 977    | 1,005  | 1,422  | 830    | 575    | 593    | 748    | 1,017 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 524    | 1,216  | 701    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-2453

___________________________

Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

 ____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

 ____________

 Submitted: January 14, 2020

Filed: January 17, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mexican citizen Tereso De Jesus Cipriano-Chacon petitions for review of an

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) which denied his application for

cancellation of removal on the ground that he failed to prove that his removal would

result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his qualifying relatives. See

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). We have no jurisdiction to review this discretionary
determination. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I); Zacarias-Velasquez v.Mukasey, 509

F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007). As Cipriano-Chacon has not raised a cognizable

constitutional or legal challenge to that determination, we dismiss the petition for

review for lack of jurisdiction. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Perez v. Holder, 569 F.3d 370,

372-73 (8th Cir. 2009).

______________________________

-2-
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-20-00376-CV

Texas General Land Office and George P. Bush,

named in his Official Capacity as Texas Land Commissioner, Appellants

v.

City of Houston, Appellee

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-20-003520, THE HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal for 30 days “while 

the parties work toward an agreed dismissal of this case” pursuant to an as-yet-unexecuted 

settlement agreement in principle between the parties. We grant the unopposed motion and abate 

this appeal. All appellate deadlines, including the deadline remaining under our October 29, 2020 

order, will be tolled during the period of abatement.

Absent further order of this Court, this appeal will be automatically reinstated 

30 days from the date of this order. The parties are directed to file either a status report or a motion 

to dismiss by that date.
2

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly

Abated

Filed: November 20, 2020.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50593

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDREW HIDALGO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:17-CR-591-1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andrew Hidalgo appeals his guilty plea conviction of possession of a 

firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He relies on 

United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), to argue that § 922(g)(1) 

unconstitutionally extends federal control to the mere non-commercial 

possession of a firearm. Hidalgo contends that a felon’s possession of a firearm, 

like possession of a firearm near a school, the offense at issue in Lopez, does 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 3, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50593 Document: 00514942605 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/03/2019
No. 18-50593

2

not have a sufficient nexus to interstate commerce. He concedes, however, that 

his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, and he raises the issue to 

preserve it for Supreme Court review.

The Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

affirmance; in the alternative, it requests an extension of time to file its brief. 

The Government agrees with Hidalgo that, under circuit precedent, Hidalgo’s 

challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is foreclosed. Summary 

affirmance is proper where, among other instances, “the position of one of the 

parties is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial 

question as to the outcome of the case . . . .” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 

406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the constitutionality of 

§ 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 

499 (5th Cir. 1999); see United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146 (5th Cir. 

2013). In United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996), we rejected 

a challenge to the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) on the basis that neither the 

holding nor the reasoning in Lopez constitutionally invalidates § 922(g)(1).

In view of the foregoing, the Government’s motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED. The Government’s alternative motion for an 

extension of time to file a brief is DENIED AS MOOT. The judgment of the 

district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-50593 Document: 00514942605 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/03/2019
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|Vermont Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|Vermont Natural Gas Total Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8,061  | 7,735  | 8,033 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10,426 | 7,919  | 8,367  | 8,400  | 8,685  | 8,372  | 8,056  | 8,867  | 8,624  | 8,638 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8,443  | 8,611  | 8,191  | 9,602  | 10,677 | 11,950 | 12,094 | 11,926 | 13,742 | 13,885
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 13,056 | 13,272 | 13,481 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**Exhibit
      15.1**








As
      independent chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in the
      foregoing Form 20-F Registration Statement, Amendment No. 5 (the
“Registration Statement”), of (i) our report, dated March 7, 2006 (except for
      Note 3 which is dated October 17, 2006), relating to (a) the consolidated
      financial statements of Dynasty Gaming, Inc., as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
      and (b) Note 26 of said financial statements, and for the years ended December
      31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 which appear in such Registration Statement, (ii) our
      report, dated March 11, 2005, relating to (a) the financial statements of
      9143-3250 Quebec Inc. as of December 31, 2004, and (b) Note 7 of said financial
      statements, and from inception to December 31, 2004 which appear in such
      Registration Statement, and (iii) our report, dated March 11, 2005, relating
      to
      the financial statements of Mahjong Systems Limited as of December 31, 2004
      and
      (b) Note 6 of said financial statements, and from inception to December 31,
      2004
      which appear in such Registration Statement, and to the reference to our Firm
      under the caption “Experts” appearing in the Registration
      Statement.








/s/
      Horwath Appel


Horwath
        Appel




Montreal,
      Quebec


January
      11, 2007
exh10_296.htm




EXHIBIT 10.29.6







PROMISSORY NOTE


















	
$11,479,365.00

	
February 1, 2012



























Mission West Properties, L.P.








	
promises to pay to

	
Lightpointe Communications, Inc.












the principal sum of Eleven Million Four Hundred Seventy Nine Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Five Dollars ($11,479,365.00),







plus interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.75 percent per annum (compounded on the basis of a 366-day year) beginning on the 1st day of February 2012.







Should interest not so be paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest when due, the whole sum of principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note.  Should suit be commenced or an attorney employed to enforce the payment of this note, we agree to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge as reasonable attorney’s fees in said suit. Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States.







Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States no later than July 15, 2012 with option for Mission to extend another six months.  Notwithstanding the above, Mission shall use its best efforts to repay the loan as soon as possible using all available sources of cash, including but not limited to cash generated from operations and cash available from any other financing sources.


















	
Signed By:

	
/s/ Raymond V. Marino

	  	
2/1/2012


	  	
Raymond V. Marino, Pres. & COO

	  	
Date


	  	
Mission West Properties, Inc.

	  	  
	  	
Its General Partner

	  	  











	
Acknowledged:

	
/s/ Carl E. Berg

	  	
2/1/2012


	  	
Carl E. Berg

	  	
Date
No. 12-308.

#### Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al. *v.*Madison.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Port of Morgan, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Port of Morgan, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | 1      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      | 123    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |       
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1161 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1161

  To reaffirm state-based alcohol regulation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2011

Mr. Chaffetz (for himself, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Coble, Mr. Conyers, 
 Mr. Deutch, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Ross of 
  Florida, and Ms. Wasserman Schultz) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reaffirm state-based alcohol regulation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Alcohol Regulatory 
Effectiveness Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

    The purpose of this Act is to recognize and reaffirm that alcohol 
is different from other consumer products and that it should continue 
to be regulated by the States.

SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR STATE ALCOHOL REGULATION.

    The Act entitled ``An Act divesting intoxicating liquors of their 
interstate character in certain cases'', approved March 2, 1913 (27 
U.S.C. 122 et seq.), commonly known as the ``Webb-Kenyon Act'', is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR STATE ALCOHOL REGULATION.

    ``(a) Declaration of Policy.--It is the policy of Congress to 
recognize and reaffirm that alcohol is different from other consumer 
products and that it should continue to be regulated by the States.
    ``(b) Construction of Congressional Silence.--Silence on the part 
of Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier under clause 3 
of section 8 of article I of the Constitution (commonly referred to as 
the `Commerce Clause') to the regulation by a State or territory of 
alcoholic beverages. However, State or territorial regulations may not 
intentionally or facially discriminate against out-of-State or out-of-
territory producers of alcoholic beverages in favor of in-State or in-
territory producers unless the State or territory can demonstrate that 
the challenged law advances a legitimate local purpose that cannot be 
adequately served by reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives.''.

SEC. 4. AMENDMENT TO WILSON ACT.

    The Act entitled ``An Act to limit the effect of the regulations of 
commerce between the several States and with foreign countries in 
certain cases'', approved August 8, 1890 (27 U.S.C. 121), commonly 
known as the ``Wilson Act'', is amended by striking ``to the same 
extent'' and all that follows through ``Territory,''.
                                 <all>
```