alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23

 

As of March 1, 2012, agreements substantially in the form attached have been entered into between the Company each non-employee director other than Steven D. Pratt:

 

	
Date
    	
 
    	
Number of Shares
    
	
May 7,   2011
    	
 
    	
76
    


 











 

Agreements substantially in the form attached have been entered into between the Company and non-employee directors with appropriate changes to reflect:

 

·      Name

·      Date

·      Number of Shares

 











 

STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

 

This Stock Award Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of                       , is between ESCO Corporation, an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and                                       (“Director”).

 

1.             Award of Stock.

 

1.1.          Award.  Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Company awards to Director                shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “Shares”) pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with Director’s service as a director.

 

1.2.          Investment Intent; Capacity to Protect Interests.  Director represents and warrants to the Company that the Shares are being acquired by Director solely for Director’s own account for investment and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution of the Shares or any portion thereof and not with any present intention of selling, offering to sell, or otherwise disposing of or distributing the Shares or any portion thereof in any transaction other than a transaction registered under or exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

2.             Legends.  All certificates representing any of the Shares will contain the following legend, in additional to one or more legends referring to applicable contractual restrictions on transfer or repurchase rights of the Company:

 

“THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE HAVE BEEN ISSUED WITHOUT REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “ACT”) OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS.  THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED FOR VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE REGISTERED UNDER THE ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR THE CORPORATION RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO IT, OR OTHERWISE SATISFIES ITSELF, THAT REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.”

 

3.             Governing Law.  This Agreement will be governed by, and will be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Oregon.

 

 

	
 
    	
ESCO   CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DIRECTOR
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
(Signature)
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
(Print Name)
**Exhibit 99.6**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Canetic Resources Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 40-F for theyear ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Paul Charron, President andChief Executive Officer of Canetic Resources Inc., who performs the samefunction for the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofmy knowledge:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| */s/ J. Paul Charron*                 | * * |
|---------------------------------------|----------|
| J. Paul Charron                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| of Canetic Resources Inc.             |
|                                  |
| March 28, 2007                        |

 

----
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Connecticut Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Connecticut Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -820   | 701    | -1,356 | -385   | 544    | -187   | 198    | 121    | 75     | -604  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 822    | -103   | -355   | -29    | -61    | -373   | 680    | 94     | 66     | -66   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -471   | -169   | 182    | 140    | -91    | -240   | -286   | 102    | 207    | 164   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 178    | 129    | 260    | -68    | -327   | -558   | 83     | -988   | -233   | -274  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -211   | -271   | -847   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
|                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                                   
|View History:                                                                                          
|                                                                                                       
|Arizona Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers for the Account of Others   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       
|                                                                                                       
|Arizona Natural Gas Delivered to Residential Consumers for the Account of Others   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 397    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 2      | 2      | 3      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2      | 2     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 3      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11908]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,163]


Coast Converters Inc., Los Angeles, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on January 20, 1998 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on January 2, 1998 on behalf of workers at Coast 
Converters Inc., located in Los Angeles, California.
    The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 8th day of April, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-11908 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### IN RE Jeff GODFREY A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

No. 17-BG-861

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

(FILED—December 21, 2017)

Bar Reg. No. 989724

BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order annulling respondent’s license to practice law in the state of West Virginia; this, court’s October 10,2017, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why .the functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline of disbarment should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the show cause order or the required D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit; and it further appearing that respondent has failed to inform the District of Columbia bar of his current address, it is

ORDERED that Jeff Godfrey is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. *See In re Sibley,*990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11 (c) will prevail except in “rare” cases); *In re Cole,*809 A.2d 1226, 1227 n.3 (D.C. 2002) (explaining that in unopposed reciprocal matters the “imposition of identical discipline should be close to automatic”). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for the purposes of reinstatement the time for reinstatement will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 62 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 62

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 
 States the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations when ratified 
        by the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2011

 Mr. Bishop of Utah (for himself, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Campbell, 
Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Graves of 
   Georgia, Mr. Griffith of Virginia, Mr. Lamborn, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. 
   McClintock, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Walberg, and Mr. Walsh of Illinois) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to give 
 States the right to repeal Federal laws and regulations when ratified 
        by the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Any provision of law or regulation of the United States may be 
repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when 
the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve 
resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same 
provision or provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-556
In Re: RONALD FLOYD JACKSON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-90-254, CA-92-1794-2BC) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Floyd Jackson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Floyd Jackson brought this mandamus petition seeking an order compelling the United States District Court for the Districtof South Carolina to act on Jackson's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) motion. Because we note that the docket sheet reflects that the district court denied the motion by minute entry dated May 24, 1995, we conclude that Jackson's petition is moot. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Nancy D. Parmelee, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 9, 2004





/s/ Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### STATE EX REL. Martavia D. KING v. STATE of Louisiana

No. 2016-KH-1327

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

01/09/2018

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FORTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF DE-SOTO

PER CURIAM

| denied. Relator’s guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction.- *State v. Crosby,*338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976). Relator also fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claim, relator fails to satisfy his post-conviction burden of proof. La,C.Cr.P, art. 930.2.

Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, *see*28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions" the filing of a second or successive- application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitation period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the Legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator’s claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive ^application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. .The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|South Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|South Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,928  | 5,607  | 5,043 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,323  | 4,211  | 10,584 | 11,181 | 10,967 | 10,661 | 10,426 | 20,701 | 32,466 | 36,301
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 40,755 | 40,668 | 40,432 | 44,039 | 44,205 | 44,094 | 44,570 | 45,641 | 46,972 | 46,014
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 45,621 | 48,732 | 50,199 | 50,626 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024