alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41536 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE ALBERTO SALGADO-AVILA, also known as Jose Ramirez-Avila, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-273-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jorge Alberto Salgado-Avila appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being a previously deported alien found in the United States illegally. Salgado-Avila argues that the district court plainly erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines in a mandatory manner. He contends that, because this error was structural in nature, prejudice should be presumed, and we should exercise our discretion to reverse the sentence. He also argues that in the event that this court holds that UnitedNo. 04-41536 -2- States v. Infante , 404 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2005), and United
States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2005) , petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517), control the outcome of his appeal, he wishes to preserve for possible future review his argument that those cases were wrongly decided and conflict with other circuits. Here, the district court erred by imposing a sentence pursuant to a mandatory application of the sentencing guidelines.
See United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 768 (2005); see also
Mares , 402 F.3d at 520-21 & n.9 . However, Salgado-Avila has not established that this error affected his substantial rights because the record does not demonstrate that the sentencing court would have imposed a different sentence had it been proceeding under an advisory guideline scheme. See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005)(No. 05-5556). Salgado-Avila also argues that, given Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He concedes that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for possible further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90 . The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History: Annual                                   
|View History:                                          
|                                                       
|Kansas Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       
|                                                       
|Kansas Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8   | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |         |         |         |         |         |         | -51,123 | -131,396 | 11,437 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10,984 | 3,958   | -31,557 | -55,687 | -66,366 | -9,042  | -92,942 | -68,958 | -8,597   | -37,046
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -5,746 | -58,352 | -68,884 | -96,789 | -62,377 | -41,471 | -33,848 | -31,233 | 24,957   | 4,211  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14,580 | 43,083  | -88,058 |         |         |         |         |         |          |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of  Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of MAXXAM Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that:

         (a) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    August 9, 2007                     /S/    M. EMILY MADISON
                                           _____________________________________
                                                   M. Emily Madison
                                                Interim Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-145251 on Form S-3 and No. 333-131900 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 10, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of HughesCommunications, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Hughes Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hughes Communications, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 10, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Radiological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). At least one 
portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.
    Name of Committee: Radiological Devices Panel of the Medical 
Devices Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Times: The meeting will be held on May 11, 1998, 9 a.m. to 
5 p.m.
    Location: Corporate Bldg., conference room 020B, 9200 Corporate 
Blvd., Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Robert J. Doyle, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-470), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1212, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), code 12526. Please call the Information Line for 
up-to-date information on this meeting.
    Agenda: The committee will discuss, make recommendations and vote 
on a premarket approval application for a computer aided detection 
system for screening mammograms.
    Procedure: On May 11, 1998, from 9 a.m. to 12 m., and from 1 p.m. 
to 5 p.m., the meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may 
present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues 
pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made to the 
contact person by May 4, 1998. Oral presentations from the public will 
be scheduled between approximately 9:15 a.m. and 9:45 a.m., and for an 
additional one half hour near the end of the Committee deliberations. 
Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to 
make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before 
May 4, 1998, and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the 
evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of 
proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time 
requested to make their presentation.
    Closed Committee Deliberations: On May 11, 1998, from 12 m. to 1 
p.m., the meeting will be closed to permit discussion and review of 
trade secret and/or confidential information. (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4)). 
This portion of the meeting will be closed to permit discussion of this 
information.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: April 20, 1998.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 98-10971 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Illinois Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Illinois Natural Gas LNG Storage Additions  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 277    | 327    | 524    | 338    | 1,034  | 653    | 199    | 223    | 393    | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 883    | 115    | 570    | 417    | 1,326  | 370    | 971    | 283    | 60     | 650   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 97     | 654    | 69     | 875    | 406    | 3      | 238    | 475    | 1      | 465   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 398    | 657    | 750    | 40     | 61     | 667    | 549    | 260    | 580    | 560   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 437    | 837    |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 12.1
 
      a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By: /s/ Yingjie Gao

      Name: Yingjie GaoTitle:   Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of American Antquities, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Kevin T. Quinlan
                                 ----------------------
                                 Kevin T. Quinlan
                                 Chief Financial Officer

January 29, 2009
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019269EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/6 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9498 — Sumitomo/TTA/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 269/05)

1.

On 5 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019269EN.01000601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sumitomo Corporation (‘SC’, Japan) |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PT Tuah Turangga Agung (‘TTA’, Indonesia), ultimately controlled by Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (China), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | The joint venture company (‘JV’, Singapore). |

SC and TTA acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for SC: integrated trading and investment activities, in particular trading of metal products, transportation and construction of systems, environment and infrastructure, chemicals and electronics, media, networks and lifestyle related goods, mineral resources, energy and life sciences, in Japan and around the world,

—   for TTA: mining and trading of coal, in Asia,

—   for the JV: trading of thermal coal, predominantly in Asia.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019269EN.01000601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9498 — Sumitomo/TTA/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019269EN.01000601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019269EN.01000601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 19 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Health and Human 

Services relating to ‘‘Health Insurance Issuers Implementing Medical 

Loss Ratio (MLR) Requirements Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2011 

Mr. CARTER introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Health 

and Human Services relating to ‘‘Health Insurance 

Issuers Implementing Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) Requirements Under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act’’. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Health and Human Services relating to 

5 ‘‘Health Insurance Issuers Implementing Medical Loss 

6 Ratio (MLR) Requirements Under the Patient Protection 

7 and Affordable Care Act’’ (published at 75 Federal RegVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:57 Jan 12, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ19.IH HJ19

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 19 IH 

1 ister 74864 (December 1, 2010)), and such rule shall have 

2 no force or effect. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 106

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2012

   Mr. Franks of Arizona (for himself and Mr. Costa) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                  protect the rights of crime victims.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The rights of a crime victim to fairness, respect, and 
dignity, being capable of protection without denying the constitutional 
rights of the accused, shall not be denied or abridged by the United 
States or any State. The crime victim shall, moreover, have the rights 
to reasonable notice of, and shall not be excluded from, public 
proceedings relating to the offense, to be heard at any release, plea, 
sentencing, or other such proceeding involving any right established by 
this article, to proceedings free from unreasonable delay, to 
reasonable notice of the release or escape of the accused, to due 
consideration of the crime victim's safety, and to restitution. The 
crime victim or the crime victim's lawful representative has standing 
to fully assert and enforce these rights in any court. Nothing in this 
article provides grounds for a new trial or any claim for damages and 
no person accused of the conduct described in section 2 of this article 
may obtain any form of relief.
    ``Section 2. For purposes of this article, a crime victim includes 
any person against whom the criminal offense is committed or who is 
directly harmed by the commission of an act, which, if committed by a 
competent adult, would constitute a crime.
    ``Section 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it has been 
ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of 
three-fourths of the several States within 14 years after the date of 
its submission to the States by the Congress. This article shall take 
effect on the 180th day after the date of its ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### A.S., Mother of I.T.S. and F.S.K., Minor Children, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2121

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 22, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.