alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1078 

To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the Water Resources 

Development Act of 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To make technical corrections to section 3013(b) of the 

Water Resources Development Act of 2007. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, ARKAN4 SAS AND LOUISIANA. 

5 Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of August 18, 

6 1941 (55 Stat. 642), as amended by section 3013(b) of 

7 the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 

8 1109), is further amended by striking ‘‘the first section 

9 of the Mississippi River Flood Control Act of May 15, 

10 1928 (45 Stat. 534),’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘the 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1078 IH

1 first section and section 6 of the Mississippi River Flood 

2 Control Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534), and any 

3 other provision of law,’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Walker

109,379

10/07/2015

Denied

50 Kan. App. 2d 900
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>     0000064500
<NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,012
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,656,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                   131,670
<INVENTORY>                                  3,773,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,679,333
<PP&E>                                       1,184,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                 614,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,329,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,696,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        248
<COMMON>                                       123,771
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,019,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,329,820
<SALES>                                      6,903,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,903,869
<CGS>                                        3,932,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,661,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             210,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,553
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,803
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-6106.

#### Chesteen *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In  connection  with the  annual  report of R&R  Acquisition  V, Inc. ( (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 27, 2008


/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-----------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
13.1




Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., a
sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify,
to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  June
      29, 2009
                          /s/ JORGE MANUEL SALES
    MARTINEZName:
                          Jorge
      Manuel Sales MartínezTitle:
                          Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:  June
      29, 2009
                          /s/ RODRIGO GUZMÁN
PERERAName:
                          Rodrigo
      Guzmán PereraTitle:
                          Chief
      Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 128

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
                      the Montford Point Marines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 30, 2012

 Ms. Brown of Florida (for herself, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, 
    Mr. Jones, Mr. Crenshaw, and Mr. West) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center 
 for an event to award the Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to 
                      the Montford Point Marines.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO AWARD THE 
              CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL TO THE MONTFORD POINT MARINES.

    (a) In General.--Emancipation Hall in the Capitol Visitor Center is 
authorized to be used on June 27, 2012, for an event to award the 
Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the Montford Point Marines.
    (b) Implementation.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 
prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company forthe period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2003, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 9, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10963]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D. C. 
20573.
    Lion Cargo Brokers Inc., 8055 N.W. 77th Court, Medley, FL 33166, 
Officers: Ramon Portu, Vice President, Manuel A. Lescano, Vice 
President.

    Dated: April 21, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10963 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
No. 12-6252.

#### Ramirez-Garcia *v.*Scutt, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plats of the following described land were officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. January 22, 1998.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
south boundary and subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of sections 
33 and 34, T. 1 S., R. 2 W., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 962, was 
accepted January 22, 1998.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines and the subdivision of certain sections, and the 
survey of lots 6 and 7 in section 4, T. 2 S., R. 2 W., Boise Meridian, 
Idaho, Group 962, was accepted January 22, 1998.
    These surveys were executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the surveys of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 South Vinnell Way, 
Boise, Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: January 22, 1998.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 98-10968 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                           
|                                                                                        
|Eastport, ID Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        
|                                                                                        
|Eastport, ID Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 1.22   | 1.60   | 1.60   | 2.04  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.79   | 4.71   | 2.83   | 4.72   | 5.30   | 7.13   | 6.22   | 6.31   | 7.88   | 3.86  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.19   | 3.90   | 2.59   | 3.34   | 4.14   | 2.34   | 1.87   | 2.10   | 1.75   | 1.93  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.90   | 3.27   | 5.52   | 3.20   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7528

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHYHEEM LEE SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (3:06-cr-01126-CMC-1; 3:10-cv-70182-CMC)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shyheem Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shyheem Lee Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1411
LINE L. THRONE, Petitioner, versus NEWPORT NEWS SHIPB UILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY; APPLIED CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED; S.G.BROWN, INCORPORATED; UNIVERSAL MARINE, INCORPORATED; UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY; ITT HARTFORD; COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-440) Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 27, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Line L. Throne, Petitioner Pro Se. Lawrence Philip Postol, SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Washington, D.C.; Gerard E.W. Voyer, TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; Philip John Infantino, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Steven Harold Theisen, MIDKIFF & HINER, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order dismissing his appeal of the administrative law judge's denial of asbestosis benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950. (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Throne v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. , No. 96-440 (B.R.B., Feb. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2019053EN.01000301.xml

| 11.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/3

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2019/C 53/03)

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ammonium nitrate | Russia | Anti-dumping duty | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 999/2014 of 23 September 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 280, 24.9.2014, p. 19). | 25.9.2019 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Ammonium nitrate

Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 999/2014 of 23 September 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 280, 24.9.2014, p. 19).

25.9.2019

---

(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---
|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History: Annual                                     
|View History:                                            
|                                                         
|Illinois Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         
|                                                         
|Illinois Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5  | Year-6   | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |        |        |         |          | 62,607  | 23,314  | 27,000 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -69,786 | 4,699   | 14,353  | 35,190 | -1,965 | -42,413 | -189,689 | 60,587  | -29,256 | 26,178 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 57,485  | 54,774  | 52,727  | 61,905 | 88,321 | 81,885  | 110,347  | 171,094 | 207,223 | 204,356
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 209,798 | 194,251 | 224,895 |        |        |         |          |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
363P16

#### State v. Credrick D. Washington

1. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Cabarrus County

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperris*

3. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Allowed

3. Dismissed as moot