alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)          
|View History: Annual                                    
|View History: Annual                                    
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Alabama Natural Gas Balancing Item  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0   | Year-1  | Year-2   | Year-3   | Year-4   | Year-5   | Year-6   | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |          |         |          |          |          |          |          | -68,207 | -27,888 | 62,874 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 50,719   | 23,279  | 34,223   | 32,646   | 36,471   | 131,036  | 37,074   | 77,309  | 1,335   | -25,228
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -63,751  | -55,703 | -162,226 | -157,668 | -147,835 | -127,357 | -137,480 | -94,749 | -94,265 | -77,752
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -133,991 | -62,133 | -55,381  |          |          |          |          |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019431EN.01000801.xml

| 23.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/8

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.9608 — ENGIE/CDC/CNR Solaire 10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 431/08)

Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004

On 25 November 2019, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 17 December 2019, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---

(1)  Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 408,4.12.2019, p. 6.

---
#### Peter F. PLANES, II, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. J. Daniel SCHMIDT, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D16-2673

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 17, 2017

L.T. NO.: 16-9721

Dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 95 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public Law 112-36) is further amended by 
striking the date

              

 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ``December 23, 2011''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 95

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
No. 12-6512.

#### Shahid *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Section
1350 Certification





In
connection with the Annual Report of Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick
Boisvert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





(1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Date:  March
13, 2009




/s/
      Patrick BoisvertPatrick
      Boisvert
              Chief
      Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,463
<SECURITIES>                                     7,908
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                       693
<INVENTORY>                                        505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,248
<PP&E>                                          68,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,374
<BONDS>                                            974
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            99
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,323
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,338
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (117)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-29-2006

In Re: Jamal Hart

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-2731

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Jamal Hart " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 549.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/549
BPS-241 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 06-2731

____________

IN RE: JAMAL HART,

 Petitioner

__________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Related to Criminal No. 97-cr-00021)

 

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.

June 8, 2006

Before: RENDELL, AMBRO and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: August 29, 2006)

_________________

 OPINION OF THE COURT

_________________

PER CURIAM

Jamal Hart petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to vacate his

judgment and sentence. We will deny Hart’s petition.

A jury found Hart guilty of possessing a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(1). He was sentenced to 188 months imprisonment. This Court affirmed. See

United States v. Hart, 175 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 1999). The United States Supreme Court

denied Hart’s petition for writ of certiorari on October 12, 1999. See Hart v. United
2

States, 528 U.S. 945 (1999). Next, Hart unsuccessfully attempted to collaterally attack

his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

In May 2006, Hart filed this mandamus petition. Hart argues that his

sentence was improperly enhanced under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Specifically, Hart states

that his sentence violated his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights in light of United States

v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), decided January 12, 2005.

Mandamus is an appropriate remedy only in the most extraordinary of

situations. Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 314 (3d Cir. 1985). To justify such a remedy, a

petitioner must show that he has (I) no other adequate means of obtaining the desired

relief and (ii) a “clear and indisputable” right to issuance of the writ. See Haines v.

Liggett Group, Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir. 1992)(citing Kerr v. United States Dist.

Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976)). In this case, Booker does not apply retroactively

because Hart’s conviction became final well before January 12, 2005. See Lloyd v.

United States, 407 F.3d 608, 615-16 (3d Cir. 2005). 

For these reasons, we will deny the mandamus petition.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Lane Co # 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, John D. Lane, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





December
      23, 2009
              /s/ John D. LaneTitle:
      John D. Lane, PresidentPrincipal
      Executive OfficerPrincipal
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2

                  CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, RONG YU, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China GrenTech Corporation
Limited (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by the report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 4, 2007

                                              By: /s/ Rong Yu
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Name: Rong Yu
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph O. Evans, Chief
Financial Officer of Chaparral Energy, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A
of Chaparral Energy, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 1, 2017
|                  | 
|By:               |  | /s/ Joseph O. Evans    
|                  |  | Joseph O. Evans        
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 98 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to increase the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 3101A of title 31, United States Code, on January 12, 2012. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise 
2 

•HJ 98 EH 

1 of authority to increase the debt limit, as exercised pursu2 ant to the certification under section 3101A(a) of title 31, 

3 United States Code. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 18, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 98 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exerUnited States Code, on January 12, 2012. submitted under section 3101A of title 31, cise of authority to increase the debt limit, as
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(a)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, Dennis J. Kuester, Chief Executive Officer of Marshall & Ilsley
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
          ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:    November 9, 2006.


                              /s/ Dennis J. Kuester
                              ______________________________

                              Dennis J. Kuester
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW1136678_1.doc
004P17

#### State v. Leonard Paul Schalow

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-330)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 01/6/2017

2.

3.
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Hidalgo, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Hidalgo, TX Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        |        |        |        | 7,597  | 12,035 | 6,017  | 2,757  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 12,639  | 1,398   | 15,318 | 21,497 | 795    | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 10     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0       | 0       | 2,506  | 9,227  | 14,862 | 8,817  | 1,695  | 9,628  | 58,295 | 120,818
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 129,992 | 126,196 | 73,286 | 82,647 |        |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. BURCKHARD, J.

1622 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/01/2017

CP-14-CR-0000953-1996 (Centre)

Affirmed
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of MCI  Communications  Corporation and Subsidiaries at September 30, 1995
and the income  statement  for the nine months ended  September  30, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                0000064079
<NAME>                        MCI Communications Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                    1,006
<SECURITIES>                                229
<RECEIVABLES>                             2,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                215
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          4,477
<PP&E>                                   14,870
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           17,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     3,898
<BONDS>                                   2,905
<COMMON>                                     74
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                9,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             17,315
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         11,128
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            10,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             595
<INCOME-TAX>                                168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         264
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.38
        


</TABLE>