alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      10,804,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,210,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                   787,000
<INVENTORY>                                 24,745,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,940,052
<PP&E>                                      61,848,515
<DEPRECIATION>                              27,219,879
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,605,905
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,537,030
<BONDS>                                      6,175,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,112
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,605,905
<SALES>                                     24,262,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,262,971
<CGS>                                       13,022,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,841,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,209,085)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,524,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,811,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,524,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,713,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
CITY OF SOUTHAVEN 

GREG DAVIS 

MAYOR 

April 30, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Top of Mississippi 

Office of the Mayor 

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Tupelo Regional Airport (TUP) 

Docket DOT-OST-2009-0305 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

8710 Northwest Drive 

Southaven, MS 38671 

Phone: 664.393.6939 

Fax: 664.393.7494 

mayor@southaven.com 

I am writing in support of Silver Airways' proposal to provide commercial air service to the 

Tupelo Regional Airport. Citizens from Southaven, Mississippi depend on the Tupelo Regional 

Airport for their air service. It is very important to our local economy for air service to continue 

in and out of Tupelo. We believe Silver Airways' interline ticketing and baggage agreements 

with Delta Airlines make this option very attractive to our citizens. In addition, the 30 to 50 seat 

aircraft are much more desirable. We are excited about this chance to return to profitability. 

Thank you for considering our citizens in your deliberations. 

Sincerely, 

Greg Davis 

Mayor
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2007 Ended September 30, 2007 of Pediment Exploration Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ John Seaman John Seaman, Chief Financial Officer   Date: March 28, 2008
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Imports (No intransit Receipts)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|North Dakota Natural Gas Imports (No intransit Receipts)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       |         |         |        
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | 1,617   | 4,559   | 6,110   | 7,672   | 9,268   | 3,416  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,718  | 495,568 | 453,645 | 435,453 | 460,237 | 491,867 | 514,052 | 465,973 | 490,045 | 480,013
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 476,864 | 448,977 | 433,721 | 432,509 | 433,256 | 419,835 | 493,100 | 489,868 | 487,071 | 460,986
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 383,491 | 443,555 | 486,081 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. COOKE, M.

516 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/15/2017

CP-22-CR-0000932-2015

(Dauphin)

Affirmed
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Louisiana Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Louisiana Natural Gas % of Total Residential Deliveries  (Percent)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.14   | 1.09   | 1.09   | 1.08   | 1.06   | 1.05   | 0.95  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1.00   | 1.03   | 1.01   | 0.93   | 0.88   | 0.85   | 0.77   | 0.79   | 0.76   | 0.76  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0.95   | 0.84   | 0.77   | 0.79   | 0.88   | 0.80   | 0.72   | 0.66   | 0.76   | 0.72  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0.69   | 0.77   | 0.72   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Kentucky Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Kentucky Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 30     | 259    | 94     | 4      | 1      | 0      | 6      | 44    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 2      | 5      | 16     | 50     | 6      | 45     | 24     | 2      | 3     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 2      | 1      | 98     |        | 15     | 3      | 124    | 15     | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5      | 8      | 1      | 29     | 52     | 51     | 65     | 51     | 111    | 23    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2      | 144    | 105    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Hogan

107,258

02/12/14

Denied.

Unpublished
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:97- cr-00053-PJM-1; 8:07-cv-02689-PJM-1) Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 7, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Jay Tenpas, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Elliott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                                         
|                                                                                      
|Eastport, ID Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      
|                                                                                      
|Eastport, ID Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | NA     | NA    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | 4.40   | 4.34   | 5.36   | --     | --     | --     | 7.43   | 4.49  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.85   | 4.74   | --     | 3.27   | --     | --     | --     | --     | 1.60   | --    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.76   | 2.53   | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
V 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1107 

For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Adrian Rodriguez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ. 

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, out of funds not otherwise appropriated, an appro6 priate amount to compensate Adrian Rodriguez for costs 

7 related to and damages arising from his arrest, prosecu8 tion, and incarceration in Mexico in 2003 as described in 

9 Claim No. 05–370C filed in the United States Court of 

10 Federal Claims. 

11 (b) SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.—The payment under 

12 subsection (a) shall be in full satisfaction of all claims of 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1107 IH

1 Adrian Rodriguez against the United States in connection 

2 with the matter described in such subsection. 

3 (c) NO INFERENCE OF LIABILITY.—Nothing in this 

4 Act shall be construed as an inference of liability on the 

5 part of the United States. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEYS’ AND AGENTS’ FEES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for an amount 

8 exceeding 10 percent of the amount paid pursuant to sec9 tion 1 to be paid to, or received by, any agent or attorney 

10 for any service rendered in connection with the payment 

11 under this Act. 

12 (b) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person who violates sub13 section (a) shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be 

14 fined under title 18, United States Code. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1(a)
Lease Quebec Premises

                             SUB- LEASING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN:     WORLDWIDE BUSINESS CONSULTANTS S.A., corporation duly incorporated
in the country of Panama, represented by Me Andre Ronald Comeau, lawyer having
his office at 507 Place d'Armes, Suite 1540, Montreal, (Quebec) Canada, H2Y 2W8;

AND:     GSI TECHNOLOGIES USA.INC., corporation duly incorporated in the state
of Delaware in the UNITED STATES, having an office at 99 Trade Road, Plattsburg,
N.Y.12901, represented by his president Mr. Rene Arbic duly authorized to the
matter;

THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS;

     1.   GSI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC., hereby, agrees to sub-lease from WORLDWIDE
          BUSINESS CONSULTANTS S.A. the premises located at 400 St-Jacques,
          suite 500, Montreal (Quebec) Canada, H2Y ISI at the same terms and
          conditions stipulated in the lease signed par WORLDWIDE BUSINESS
          CONSULTANTS S.A. with the Landlord, copy of the said lease is attached
          to the present agreement.
     2.   GSI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC undertakes to fulfill all the obligations of
          WORLDWIDE BUSINESS CONSULTANTS S.A. mentioned in this lease.
     3.   All payment shall be made directly to the Landlord and to the others
          parties for services, like electricity, taxes, etc.
     4.   GSI TECHNOLOGIES USA INC agrees to pay for any damages caused to the
          premises during the term of occupation and to hold an insurance policy
          for an amount of two millions dollars C.D.N. In favor of WORLDWIDE
                                        ---------------
          BUSINESS CONSULTANTS S.A. during the term of this agreement.


After having read and understood, the parties have signed:

GSI TECHNOLOGIES USA-INC.
Per : Rene Arbic


WORLDWIDE BUSINESS CONSULTANTS S.A.

Per: Me Andre Ronald Comeau


Montreal, the first of September 2002.


                                       1
<PAGE>