alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|California Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|California Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,627,420
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,620,132 | 1,623,693 | 1,610,708 | 1,654,143 | 1,887,149 | 1,690,530 | 1,547,503 | 1,671,128 | 1,820,433 | 1,795,215
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,928,462 | 2,165,838 | 1,955,339 | 1,981,415 | 2,145,937 | 2,070,473 | 2,115,526 | 2,368,404 | 2,443,165 | 2,342,621
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,090,195 | 2,109,607 | 2,342,250 | 2,192,192 | 2,260,465 | 2,251,949 | 2,108,051 | 2,052,586 | 2,043,322 | 2,149,615
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,158,866 | 2,175,202 | 2,120,935 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Minnesota Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 71     | 172    | 2,193  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 3,975  | 11,768 | 16,209 | 5,474  | 5,245  | 4,747  | 6,330  | 12,882 | 13,668
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8,696  | 3,238  | 5,047  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
181A93-4

#### State v. Rayford Lewis Burke (DEATH)

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to Amend Petitioner-Appellant’s Brief

Allowed 09/09/2016

Ervin, J., recused
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 98 

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive order that infringes 

on the powers and duties of the Congress under article I, section 8 

of the Constitution, or that would require the expenditure of Federal 

funds not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive 

order, is advisory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as 

law. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2012 

Ms. JENKINS (for herself, Mr. PAUL, Mrs. BLACK, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. 

YODER, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. AKIN, Mr. SCHILLING, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

HERGER, and Mr. GOSAR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To express the sense of the Congress that any Executive 

order that infringes on the powers and duties of the 

Congress under article I, section 8 of the Constitution, 

or that would require the expenditure of Federal funds 

not specifically appropriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advisory only and has no force or effect 

unless enacted as law. 

Whereas some Executive orders have infringed on the prerogatives of the Congress and resulted in the expenditure of 

Federal funds not appropriated for the specific purposes 

of those Executive orders: Now, therefore, be it 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 98 IH 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that any 

3 Executive order issued by the President before, on, or 

4 after the date of the approval of this resolution that in5 fringes on the powers and duties of the Congress under 

6 article I, section 8 of the Constitution, or that would re7 quire the expenditure of Federal funds not specifically ap8 propriated for the purpose of the Executive order, is advi9 sory only and has no force or effect unless enacted as law. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Glenn A. Kleinert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 6, 2004







/s/ Glenn. A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl QUAlITY STEVEN A. THOMPSON BRAD HENRY 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY Governor Executive Director

June 16, 2008 Lafarge BuildingMaterials Attn: Ms. PamelaBennett 2609 N. 145th East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74116 Subject: BestAvailable Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver Lafarge TulsaCement Plant DearMs. Bennett: The Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ODEQ) received a BART waiver request for the referenced site on December 1, 2006 with updates received November 14, 2007, and March 17, 2008. After the technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Tulsa Cement Plant. This waiver is based on facility BART sources which are not expected to cause or contribute to visibility impacts at Class I areas based on submitted modeling. While ODEQ has approved the waiver, the waiver is subject to EPA and public comment during the Regional Haze State ImplementationProgram (SIP) approval process.**Tha~~** you for your cooperation in this matter. Ifwe may be offurther service, please contaclJ.>1;lillip Fielder{405) 702-4100.

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677,OKLAHOMACITY, OKLAHOMA 73101-1677 printed on recycled paper with soy Ink 

## . 0
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[CGD 05-98-031]


Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Approaches to 
Annapolis Harbor, Spa Creek, and Severn River, Annapolis, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of implementation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice implements the special local regulations during 
the transit of participating vessels from Annapolis Harbor, Maryland, 
to the race start area on the Chesapeake Bay for Leg 8 of the Whitbread 
Round-the-World sailing race on May 3, 1998. These special local 
regulations are necessary to control vessel traffic in the vicinity of 
Spa Creek and the Severn River due to the confined nature of the 
waterway and expected vessel congestion during the transit of the 
racers. The effect will be to restrict general navigation in the 
regulated area for the safety of race participants, spectator craft and 
other vessels transiting the event area.

DATES: The special local regulations are effective from 10 a.m. EDT 
(Eastern Daylight Time) to 11 a.m. EDT on May 3, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chief Warrant Officer R.L. Houck, Marine Events Coordinator, Commander, 
Coast Guard Activities Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Baltimore, 
MD 21226-1971, (410) 576-2674.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The start for Leg 8 of the Whitbread Round-
the-World sailing race will be held in the vicinity of Annapolis, 
Maryland, on May 3, 1998. The vessels participating in the race will 
conduct an organized transit from Annapolis Harbor to the race start 
area. Therefore, to ensure the safety of the racers, spectators and 
transiting vessels, 33 CFR 100.511 will be in effect for the duration 
of the transit to the race start area. Under provisions of 33 CFR 
100.511, a vessel may not enter the regulated area unless it receives 
permission from the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, and the operator of 
any vessel in the regulated area shall stop the vessel immediately upon 
being directed to do so by any commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 
on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard ensign. Spectator vessels 
may anchor outside the regulated area but may not block a navigable 
channel. Because these restrictions will be in effect for a limited 
period, they should not result in a significant disruption of maritime 
traffic.

    Dated: April 21, 1998.
J.S. Carmichael,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 98-11649 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
005P17

#### Gary Warren Spruill v. Westfield Insurance Company, Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Def’s (Westfield Insurance Company) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1329)

Denied
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herm Rosenman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Gen-Probe Incorporated; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



| |  |                          |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                         
| |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                          |  | 
| |  | DATE: September 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Herm Rosenman                                                       
| |  |                          |  |  |  |     |  | Herm Rosenman Senior Vice
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                            
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History: Annual                                                      
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Illinois Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Illinois Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Refinery Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 14     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 1,062  | 3,423  | 4,108  | 2,686  | 2,513 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,910  | 756    | 291    | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, and Section 
122 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622, notice is hereby given that on April 14, 
1998, a proposed De Minimis Consent Decree in United States v. 
CertainTeed Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 98-71586, was lodged 
with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 
Michigan, Southern Division. This consent decree represents a 
settlement of claims of the United States against CertainTeed 
Corporation D/B/A Wolverine Technologies, Inc., United Paint & Chemical 
Corporation, and Brazeway, Inc., for reimbursement of response costs 
and injunctive relief in connection with the Metamora Landfill 
Superfund Site (``Site'') pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.
    Under this settlement with the United States, CertainTeed 
Corporation will pay $841,612, United Paint & Chemical Corporation will 
pay $313,707, and Brazeway, Inc. will pay $388,761, for a total of 
$1,544,080, in reimbursement of response costs incurred by the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. CertainTeed, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-3-289J.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern 
Division, 211 West Fort Street, Suite 2300, Detroit, MI 48226, at the 
Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 
Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 
624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in 
person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW., 
4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a 
check in the amount of $6.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Walker Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-11133 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00070-CV

J. T., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY 

NO. 294,567-E, THE HONORABLE JACK WELDON JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant J. T. filed his notice of appeal on February 9, 2021. The appellate 

record was complete on March 2, 2021, making appellant’s brief due on March 22, 2021. On 

March 22, 2021, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file appellant’s

brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order Yolanda Cortes Mares to file 

appellant’s brief no later than April 12, 2021. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may 

be required to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on March 24, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith
#### State v. Pattillo

102,525

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished