alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 3, 2015 

Dear Mr. McCarty: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−2589). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 9/17/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
Exhibit 10.3 Termination Agreement


Exhibit 10.3




TERMINATION AGREEMENT







AGREEMENT dated this 11th day of January 2012, by and between W270, INC. (hereinafter “W270”), a Nevada corporation, with offices located at 4221 Camino Alegre, La Mesa, California, 91941, Wesley E. Fry, President of W270 and Gary B. Wolff, P.C., counsel to W270, with offices located at 488 Madison Avenue, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10022.




WHEREAS, W270 entered into an agreement on June 27th, 2011 with Gary B. Wolff, P.C. to assist with the filing of W270’s prospectus and legal representation of W270; and




WHEREAS, W270 and Gary B. Wolff, P.C. have agreed to terminate the agreement entered in on June 27th, 2011 and legal representation and settle all outstanding professional services by Gary B. Wolff, P.C. with a payable due to Gary B. Wolff, P.C. by W270 in the amount of $20,000.00.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Termination Agreement to be executed as of the 11th day of January 2012.  







W270, INC.







By: /s/ Wesley Fry

Wesley E. Fry, President










GARY B. WOLFF, P.C.







By: /s/ Gary Wolff

Gary B. Wolff, President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard Denoyer, Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ BERNARD DENOYER Bernard Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


April 15,
2009

---



QuickLinks
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0671 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 096

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

c ost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Cond**  **ition Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 

### $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexi bility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
2/15/2015 Version 1.1 SkyFire Services LLC

AERIAL DATA ACQUISITION - MISSION PLANNING STEPS

1. Understand the Mission goals and objectives

2. Identify flight mission geographic location, airspace restrictions, private property access, etc.

3. Obtain a Weather Briefing for area operations (wx.gov, wx-brief, etc).

4. Plan the mission flight pattern using GCS, refer to Google Earth if necessary. (Camera, 

resolution, etc). You can upload this mission to the aircraft ahead of time.

5. Site Inspection – once on site identify the following:

a. Launch/landing zones

b. Emergency landing zones

c. Pilot & Observer work area

d. Area hazards & mitigation strategy– people/building/landscape-trees/power lines/etc.

e. Discuss emergency procedures for the site, 911 use, medical emergencies-IFAK, fire 

safety

6. On site modifications to flight mission if necessary – rally points, updated waypoints, etc.

7. Preflight briefing & Launch – see Pre-Flight Checklist

8. Monitor the aircraft and mission during flight, by Observer & Ground Station 

9. Recovery / Landing

10. Post-flight Checklist, after action review

11. Extract data from camera

12. Process imagery data, if necessary re-fly the mission to meet mission goals
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23302-23303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Docket 98-059]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir 
Rendezvous and Docking Missions; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces an open meeting of the NAC Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir 
Rendezvous and Docking Missions. Some members of the Task Force will be 
participating via telecon.

DATES: May 20, 1998, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time.


[[Page 23303]]


ADDRESS: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Building 1, Room 920L, Houston, TX 77058-3696.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Dennis McSweeney, Code IH, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001, 202/358-4556.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public up 
to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Review the readiness of the STS-91 Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous and Docking 
Mission.

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitors register.

    Dated: April 22, 1998.
Mathew M. Crouch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 98-11267 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
No. 12-6156.

#### Young *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0517

DCN:_____07337___________________________ 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                           
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                                     
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|No chart available.                                                                      
|No chart available.                                                                      
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|West Virginia Natural Gas Underground Storage Salt Caverns Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. D-2685.

#### In re Disbarment of Conour.

[For earlier order herein, see 567 U. S. 959.]

Disbarment entered.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0161 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JACOB OVERLEASE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 8, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2021

09/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0161
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY LLOYD JOHNSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cr-00042-NKM-RSB-1; 

3:16-cv-81156-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: September 10, 2018 Decided: October 11, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa M. Lorish, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Charlottesville, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Lloyd Johnston seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion challenging his sentence as an armed career criminal based 

on Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). We previously placed the appeal in 

abeyance for United States v. Hodge, __ F.3d __, 2018 WL 3999898 (4th Cir. Aug. 22, 

2018). Johnston now moves to remand his case for further proceedings in accordance 

with Hodge, and the Government agrees that it is appropriate to vacate the district court’s 

order and remand the case for reconsideration of the § 2255 motion in light of Hodge. In 

light of our decision in Hodge, we grant a certificate of appealability, grant the motion to 

remand, vacate the district court’s order, and remand for reconsideration of the § 2255 

motion in light of Hodge. We deny Johnston’s motion to expedite as moot. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 87 (Wednesday, May 6, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25025-25026]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-2045-000]


Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 30, 1998.
    Conectiv Energy Supply, Inc. (CES) filed an application for 
authorization to engage in wholesale sales of electric capacity and/or 
energy at market-based rates, and for certain waivers and 
authorizations. In particular, CES requested that the Commission grant 
blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of 
securities and assumptions of liabilities by CES. On April 29, 1998, 
the Commission issued an Order Conditionally Accepting For Filing 
Proposed Tariff For Market-Based Power Sales And Reassignment Of 
Transmission And Ancillary Service Rights (Order), in the above-
docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's April 29, 1998 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (E), (F), and (H):
    (E) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to pretest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by CES should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (F) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (E) above, CES is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of CES, compatible with the public 
interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    (H) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of CES's 
issuance of securities or assumptions of liabilities. . . .
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 29, 1998.

[[Page 25026]]

    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11953 Filed 5-5-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**





VIA:
      EMAIL





Structured
      Asset Securities Corporation II


745
      Seventh Avenue


New
      York,
      New York 10019





Re:
      The
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      between Structured Asset Securities Corporation II as depositor (the
“Depositor”), LaSalle Bank National Association as trustee (the “Trustee”),
      Wachovia Bank, National Association as master servicer (the “Master Servicer”)
      and LNR Partners, Inc. as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”), relating to
      LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
      Series 2006-C1.





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.











Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee








/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
#### State v. Grotton

110,150

07/24/2015

Denied

50 Kan. App. 2d 1028
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Illinois Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Acquifers Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 17    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 17     | 17     | 17     | 17     | 18     | 18     | 18     | 18     | 18    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 17     | 17     | 17     | 19     | 19     | 19     | 19     | 17     | 18     | 18    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 18     | 18     | 17     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. ROBERTS, J.

1104 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/08/2017

CP-51-CR-0009992-2013

(Philadelphia)

Vacated/Remanded
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         120,500
<SECURITIES>                                    50,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,800
<INVENTORY>                                    623,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,239,800
<PP&E>                                       2,003,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 750,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,883,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          615,300
<BONDS>                                      1,710,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        300
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (60,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,883,100
<SALES>                                      1,921,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,921,100
<CGS>                                        1,566,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,566,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (27,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.96
        

</TABLE>