alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nancy D.
Parmelee, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her
knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May
8, 2008











/s/
Nancy D. Parmelee


Nancy D. Parmelee


Senior
Vice President,


Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered April 23, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00856-CV

THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant

V.

ANGELA HORTON AND KEVIN HOUSER, Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06507

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ April 5, 2021 motion for en banc 

reconsideration. Appellant is requested to file a response, if any, by May 17, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# U-Boom Reduce heat radiation and fire risk from burners to an offshore rig

A MODULAR BOOM DESIGN FOR FLARING OPERATIONS 

### Burners efficiently dispose of oil produced at the surface during offshore well tests, but the flares must be kept at a safe distance from the rig structure. To reduce heat radiation onto an offshore platform or drillship and to protect rig personnel, the burners are supported by long booms. The U-boom is a modular design, typically consisting of two sections that extend approximately 18 m [60 ft]. By adding an intermediate section, the boom can be lengthened to about 26 m [85 ft]. The structural design of the U-boom allows access to the burner and supports pipes that are laterally positioned on the boom sides. These pipes supply the burner with air, water, oil, and propane. The U-boom is mounted on the rig with a rotating base plate and guy lines. Horizontal guy lines help orient the boom; and vertical guy lines, which are fixed to the rig’s main structure, support the boom. The rotating base enables horizontal and vertical positioning of the boom and burner. The boom is positioned slightly above horizontal so that any oil left in the piping after flaring operations does not leak out and cause pollution. To ensure nonhazardous burning in changing wind directions, two booms are typically installed on opposite sides of the drilling platform or drillship.

U-boom. 

### Pilot line Cable Oil line Water line Water-wall screen line Air line Gas line Additional gas line APPLICATIONS ■ 

### Provide support for the burner

and piping. ■ 

### Allow access to the burner and

piping. BENEFITS ■ 

### Reduce heat radiation. ■ 

### Protect rig personnel. ■ 

### Limit burner noise on the rig. FEATURES ■ 

### Modular design ■ 

### Suitable for H 2

### S service ■ 

### Available in two or three

sections ■ 

### Piping for oil, water with filter,

air with check valve, and propane, in addition to one gas flare07-WT-053 November 2007 Copyright © 2007 Schlumberger. All rights reserved. 

# U-Boom

www.slb.com/welltesting Specifications Model UBM-DA UBM-EA UBM-F UBM-G Service H 2 S H 2S H 2S H 2S Length, m [ft] 18 [60] 26 [85] 18 [60] 26 [85] Width, m [ft] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92] Weight, kg [lbm] 4,900 [10,803] 6,900 [15,212] 4,900 [10,803] 6,900 [15,212] Working temperature, degC [degF] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212] 0 to 100 [32 to 212] 0 to 100 [32 to 212] Wind capacity, † km/h [mi/h] 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity Connections, Fig. 602 female/male Air, mm [in] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4] Oil, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] Gas ‡ , mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] Water, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] Applicable codes ANSI § B31.3 ANSI B31.3 ANSI B31.3 ANSI B31.3

† Dynamic, no ice ‡ Optional 101.6-mm [4-in] and 152.4-mm [6-in] connections are available. § American National Standards Institute
#### SED HOLDINGS, LLC v. 3 STAR PROPERTIES, LLC, et al.

*From Durham*County

No. 211PA16

ORDER

The following order was entered:

Defendants’ motion to appear, filed on 20 October 2016, is allowed. This case is stayed by virtue of the automatic stay arising from the bankruptcy proceeding against defendant 3 Star Properties, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in Case 16-34815. Plaintiff’s motion to be permitted to proceed now in the trial court against the remaining defendants, filed on 27 October 2016, also appears to be subject to the automatic stay.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 1st day of November, 2016.

s/Ervin. J.

For the Court

WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 1st day of November, 2016.

J. BRYAN BOYD Clerk of the Supreme Court

s/M.C. Hacknev Assistant Clerk
COMPENSATION
PHILOSOPHY
  
 Flagstone’s
Compensation programs are designed to give employees reasons to
excel.
  Through
its performance management and rewards processes and programs, Flagstone
endeavours to create an environment that fosters and rewards:
  ●
                striving
      for and achieving excellence;●
                engaging
      in responsible relationships with clients, colleagues, and shareholders;
      and●
                maintaining
      the highest ethical
standards.
 
  All
compensation programs are intended to align the interests of employees and
management with shareholders and to foster sustained value creation with
particular emphasis on total compensation management, pay for performance and
the use of Flagstone equity.
  The
total compensation concept
  At
Flagstone, compensation refers to the combination of base salaries, annual bonus
awards, and equity compensation opportunities as well as deferred compensation
opportunities and benefits, which vary by country.
  Upon
joining Flagstone, employees receive a base salary, are eligible for an annual
incentive bonus award based on performance and can participate in certain equity
compensation programs depending on their level of seniority.
  Base
salary is used to recognize particularly the experience, skills and knowledge
that individuals bring to their roles. Salary levels are determined primarily
based on functional role, level of responsibility and relevant competitive
practices.
  Annual
incentive bonus awards are determined annually on a discretionary basis. They
are strictly and rigorously correlated with performance, and can therefore be
highly variable from year to year.
  Pay
for performance
  Flagstone
is committed to providing superior compensation in return for superior
performance and to developing the measurement systems and decision processes
necessary to support the best compensation decision making.
  Performance
assessments consider the given individual’s scope of responsibility or sphere of
influence.  Performance assessments incorporate quantitative and
qualitative elements include a balanced assessment of financial results,
operational results and leading indicators of future performance, to the extent
feasible.
    Page 1 of
2
   
   The
role of Flagstone equity
  Significant
numbers of Flagstone employees are required to take a portion of their annual
performance-based compensation in the form of Performance Share Units or
Restricted Stock Units (PSU’s or RSU’s).
  Flagstone
believes that broad-based employee stock ownership enhances its ability to
deliver superior shareholder returns by increasing the alignment between the
interests of employees and shareholders. The goal of these programs is to engage
all employees as partners in Flagstone’ success and to help the Firm realize the
maximum gain from its strategy.
  
  
  
  Approved
15th June, 2006
   Page
2 of 2
#### FERRONE, R. v. HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES

1279 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/11/2017

A.D. No. 14-10463

(Butler)

Affirmed
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

May 3, 2004 

 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, California 

 

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-62228 and 333-01583 

 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the usetherein of our report dated May 3, 2004 related to our review of interim financial information. 

 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant, or a report prepared or certified byan accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

KPMG LLP

 

Los Angeles, California
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 77 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of authority to increase 

the debt limit, as submitted under section 3101A of title 31, United 

States Code, on August 2, 2011. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. MACK, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. 

GRAVES of Missouri, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. HUELSKAMP, Mr. ROSS of 

Florida, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. AUSTRIA, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, 

Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. PAUL, Mr. TERRY, Mr. 

LANDRY, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. 

DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

NEUGEBAUER, Mr. WEST, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. LATTA, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SAM JOHNSON

of Texas, Mr. GRAVES of Georgia, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. GUINTA, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. BONNER, Mr. GINGREY of 

Georgia, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois, Mr. JONES, Mr. 

ROONEY, Mr. QUAYLE, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. STUTZMAN, Mr. MCKEON, 

Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, and Mr. BURTON

of Indiana) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to the disapproval of the President’s exercise of 

authority to increase the debt limit, as submitted under 

section 3101A of title 31, United States Code, on August 

2, 2011. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 77 IH 

1 That Congress disapproves of the President’s exercise of 

2 authority to increase the debt limit, as exercised pursuant 

3 to the certification under section 3101A(a) of title 31, 

4 United States Code. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 
 CONTINGENT ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT 
 THIS IS PREPARED WITH THE
CONTINGENCY OF THE RENTAL OF THE FOLLOWING MENTIONED PROPERTY. ADDENDUM TO LEASE DATED 15th OF NOVEMBER WITH A MOVE IN DATE OF NOVEMBER 15, 2011 BETWEEN HENRY AMALGAMATED LLC, (LESSOR) AND ANGIE’S LIST, INC., (LESSEE). 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee entered into the lease agreement dated March 1, 2009 for office space. 

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that the Lease Agreement is hereby modified and amended in the following respects to be effective
November 15, 2011 with a move in date of November 15, 2011. WIT: 
  

	 	1.	Paragraph (1) (Description of Premises) Lessor hereby leases additional office space known as the following to the lessee: 1032 E Washington Street 46202.


  

	 	2.	Paragraph (4) (Rent) The amount for the additional office space with square footage of 4,600 will be $4,217.00 a month. 


Except as specifically mentioned herein, all other terms and conditions of the original Lease Agreement shall remain the same and
unchanged 
 Henry Amalgamated LLC 

Lessor 
  

									
	/s/ Karl Northern	 		 	Date:	 	12/20/2011

 Angie’s List, Inc 
 Lessee 
  

									
	/s/ Robert R. Millard	 		 	Date:	 	12/20/2011
037P17

#### State v. Kevin John Kirkman

Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA16-407)

Denied
#### COM. v. MACK, D.

2723 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

CP-51-CR-0002453-2007 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11863]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1008-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1008-DR), dated January 17, 1994, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 14, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, effective this 
date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I 
hereby appoint Christina Lopez of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared 
disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Lelamd Wilson as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 98-11863 Filed 5-4-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### LLANO FINANCING GROUP, LLC, Appellant, v. David NYITRAY, Kamphaus Nyitray & Associates, Appellees.

No. 4D16-3866

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[January 10, 2018]

*449Robert J. Hauser of Pankauski Hauser PLLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Alex Tirado-Luciano of Lydecker Diaz, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

*Affirmed. See Llano Financing Group, LLC v. Yespy,*228 So.3d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Gross, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23786-23787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-6006-6]


Science Advisory Board; Notification of Public Teleconference 
Meeting

May 14, 1998
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, notification is hereby given that the Science Advisory Board's 
(SAB)

[[Page 23787]]

Ecological Processes and Effects Committee will conduct a public 
teleconference meeting on Thursday, May 14, 1998, between the hours of 
11:00 am and 1:00 pm, Eastern Time. The purpose of the meeting is for 
the Committee to discuss possible strategic projects that it may wish 
to initiate over the coming months. A limited number of teleconference 
lines will be available on a first-come first-served basis for members 
of the public who wish to call into the meeting. For additional 
information on the meeting, including how to participate in the 
conference call, contact Ms. Stephanie Sanzone, Designated Federal 
Official for the Committee, at (202) 260-6557 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee9d8f809481808bc09d9a8b9e868f80878bae8b9e8fc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c2f3d3226333239722f28392c343d3235391c392c3d723b332a">[email protected]</span></a> no later than 4:00 pm on May 12, 1998. Anyone 
wishing to provide written or oral comments (limited to five minutes 
per individual) to the Committee must contact Ms. Sanzone in writing by 
4:00 pm on May 12, 1998 at fax (202) 260-7118 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c7f6d6276636269227f78697c646d6265694c697c6d226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93e0f2fde9fcfdf6bde0e7f6e3fbf2fdfaf6d3f6e3f2bdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 22, 1998.
Donald G. Barnes,
Staff Director, Science Advisory Board.
[FR Doc. 98-11513 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 3.92   | 2.35   | 2.35   | 2.14   | 2.05  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.31   | 1.79   | 1.88   | 2.08   | 2.08   | 1.64   | 2.45   | 2.49   | 2.13   | 2.30  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.02   | 4.14   | 3.32   | 5.66   | 6.18   | 7.77   | 6.90   | 6.96   | 8.62   | 4.34  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.75   | 4.35   | 3.08   | 4.06   | 5.40   | 2.95   | 2.63   | 3.20   | 3.34   | 2.64  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.10   | 4.94   | 6.34   | 2.54   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 80 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 80

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United Nations or NATO should 
         investigate the treatment of black Africans in Libya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 15, 2011

Mr. Johnson of Illinois submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United Nations or NATO should 
         investigate the treatment of black Africans in Libya.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of State should 
direct the permanent representative of the United States to the North 
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the permanent representative of 
the United States to the United Nations to request that NATO and the 
United Nations, respectively, investigate the treatment of black 
Africans in Libya.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3000-3001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Draft Yosemite Valley Implementation Plan Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement; Yosemite National Park, California; 
Extension of Public Comment Period

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190 as amended), the National Park 
Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared a Draft Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement assessing alternatives for, and 
potential impacts of, a proposed Yosemite Valley Implementation Plan 
for Yosemite National Park, California. In deference to public interest 
expressed to date from local governmental agencies, organizations, and 
other interested parties, the original 75 day public comment period has 
been extended an additional 31 calendar days to February 23, 1998.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments on the draft document must 
now be received or post-marked not later than February 23, 1998, and 
should be directed to the Superintendent, Attn: VIP Planning, Yosemite 
National Park, P.O. Box 577, Yosemite, CA 95389, (209) 372-0202. 
Comments may also be submitted through the National Park Service 
planning page: Yosemite Valley Implementation Plan/Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement. Also, open houses and public workshops 
have previously been conducted in several California cities; during the 
extended

[[Page 3001]]

comment period, additional workshops are to be held in Yosemite gateway 
communities. Complete details may be obtained as noted above.

    Dated: January 9, 1998.
John J. Reynolds,
Regional Director, Pacific West.
[FR Doc. 98-1196 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P