alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
will not issue when the petitioners have a plain, speedy, and adequate 

remedy at law, NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and we have consistently held 

that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ 

relief. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 

841 (2004). 

Having considered the petition and appendix, we conclude 

that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. 

NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Specifically, 

petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from 

any adverse final judgment. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Hansen Rasmussen, LLC 

Cottle Law Firm 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|New Jersey Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|New Jersey Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,039,568
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,036,853 | 1,049,018 | 1,108,758 | 1,018,950 | 1,119,949 | 1,296,464 | 1,217,278 | 1,274,307 | 1,154,761 | 1,357,384
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,322,670 | 1,283,693 | 1,332,510 | 1,300,566 | 1,305,228 | 1,274,343 | 1,215,715 | 1,434,628 | 1,438,572 | 1,376,221
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,373,802 | 1,520,670 | 1,550,686 | 1,583,481 | 1,718,872 | 1,701,848 | 1,657,930 | 1,718,923 | 1,634,610 | 1,699,035
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,535,454 | 1,759,906 | 1,921,473 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 1, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don E.
Marsh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Don E. Marsh
------------------
Don E. Marsh
Chief Executive Officer
February 15, 2005
Exhibit 31

      Exhibit 31:  Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

Re:   Morgan Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1 (the "Trust")

I, Steven Shapiro, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of the Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations
under the servicing agreements; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP, LaSalle Bank National Association, HomEq Servicing Corporation,
First NLC Financial Services, Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, and Deutsche
Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Steven Shapiro
By: Steven Shapiro
Title: Vice President
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History: Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|West Virginia Natural Gas Number of Residential Consumers  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 351,024 | 349,765 | 349,347
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 349,673 | 350,489 | 352,463 | 352,997 | 352,929 | 353,629 | 358,049 | 362,432 | 359,783 | 362,292
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 360,471 | 363,126 | 361,171 | 359,919 | 358,027 | 374,301 | 353,292 | 347,433 | 347,368 | 343,837
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 344,131 | 342,069 | 340,256 | 340,102 | 338,652 | 337,643 | 337,115 | 335,940 | 335,316 | 333,908
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 336,322 | 336,296 | 336,562 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Salcido

111,837

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MAY
DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 29, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                        17
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                        66
<INVENTORY>                                      3,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,227
<PP&E>                                           7,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,556
<BONDS>                                          3,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,897
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,080
<SALES>                                          3,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,050
<CGS>                                            2,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    200
<INCOME-TAX>                                        80
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                120
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       120
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
#### COM. v. ROBINSON, H.

2434 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0009742-2015 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### Z.R., Mother of S.W., P.L. and S.P., Minor Children, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2386

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 25, 2017

' An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Michael G. Allen, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31

                                  Certification

I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Ameriquest Mortgage
Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R11;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.
<PAGE>

Date: 3/14/06

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC.

/s/ John P. Grazer
------------------
John P. Grazer
CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RUSSELL CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                           4,485
<SECURITIES>                                     1,570
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,337
<INVENTORY>                                    321,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               564,877
<PP&E>                                       1,012,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                 531,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,118,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,807
<BONDS>                                        287,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           414
<OTHER-SE>                                     632,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,118,164
<SALES>                                      1,152,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,152,633
<CGS>                                          816,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  816,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,408
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Freddie Lee Toms, Appellant.

[767 NYS2d 692]

Crew III, J.P

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J.), rendered April 16, 2002, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crimes of robbery in the first degree (four counts) and arson in the third degree.

Pursuant to a negotiated plea, defendant pleaded guilty to four counts of robbery in the first degree and one count of arson in the third degree in exchange for concurrent sentences of 121/2 to 25 years on the robbery counts and 5 to 15 years on the arson count, with such sentences also running concurrently with a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon defendant in Texas. While the plea agreement made no reference to restitution, County Court ordered defendant to pay restitution in the amount of $3,296.

On appeal to this Court, defendant’s judgment of conviction was modified, his sentences were vacated and the matter was *898remitted to County Court “for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision” (293 AD2d 768, 769 [2002]) on the ground that it was error to enhance the agreed-upon sentence by imposing restitution without advising defendant of his right to either withdraw his plea or accept the enhanced sentence.

Following this Court’s remittal to County Court, defendant was sentenced to the originally agreed-upon terms of imprisonment without the order of restitution. On this appeal, defendant asserts that County Court’s resentencing order was inconsistent with the terms of this Court’s previous memorandum decision in that defendant was not offered the right to withdraw his previous pleas or accept the enhanced sentence of restitution. We disagree.

In our prior decision, we noted that where a plea agreement does not include mention of restitution, a defendant must be given the opportunity to either withdraw his or her plea or accept the greater sentence of restitution, and we remitted the matter to County Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with that decision. In other words, upon remittal, County Court was free to sentence defendant in accordance with the negotiated agreement or, if it insisted upon imposition of restitution, offer defendant the opportunity to withdraw his pleas. County Court’s adherence to the original plea agreement is not inconsistent with our memorandum decision and we, accordingly, affirm.

Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1330 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 190

103d CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1330

                          [Report No. 103-133]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel SERENA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            August 24, 1993

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 190
103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1330

                          [Report No. 103-133]

   To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel SERENA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 30 (legislative day, June 30), 1993

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

                            August 24, 1993

   Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of August 2 
  (legislative day, June 30), 1993, by Mr. Hollings, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel SERENA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel 
SERENA, United States official number 965317.
```
No. 12-343.

#### Frluckaj *v.*Long, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.