alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
pnx_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1







THIRD AMENDMENT TO


THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC.


NON-QUALIFIED EXCESS INVESTMENT PLAN


As Amended and Restated Effective September 1, 2009







The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Non-qualified Excess Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective September 1, 2009 (the “Plan”), is further amended effective January 1, 2012, as follows:








	
1.

	
Section 2.29 is amended to add a new sentence at the end to read as follows:












Effective January 1, 2012, an Employee who meets the eligibility requirements of Article III and elects to participate in the Plan shall be considered a Participant on the date set forth in Section 3.02.








	
2.

	
Section 2.14 is deleted and each subsequent section of Article II is renumbered accordingly:













	
3.

	
Section 3.02 is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:













	
  

	
3.02

	
Commencement of Participation.  Each eligible Employee shall become a Participant in the Plan as of the January 1 or July 1 next following the date he or she meets the eligibility requirement in Section 3.01 and completes an Excess Investment Deferral Election as described in Section 5.01.













	
4.

	
Section 4.02(c) is amended to insert the phrase, "through March 31, 2010" after the phrase, "continuing thereafter for Grandfathered Participants only" in the first sentence and to delete the term, "and" at the end of the section.













	
5.

	
Section 4.02(e) is deleted.
#### COM. v. LEE, J.

2610 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0011788-2009, CP-51-CR-0011789-2009, CP-51-CR-0014002-2009 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
No. 12-6597.

#### Thompson *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019299EN.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/12 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9458 — CBRE/Telford Homes)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 299/07)

1.

On 28 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019299EN.01001201-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | CBRE Group, Inc. (‘CBRE’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Telford Homes PLC (‘Telford Homes’, UK). |

CBRE acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Telford Homes.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for CBRE: provides commercial real estate services on a worldwide basis, including real estate management services and facilities management services, commercial real estate investment management, and development services,

—   for Telford Homes: develops residential-led, mixed-use sites in the United Kingdom.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019299EN.01001201-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9458 — CBRE/Telford Homes

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019299EN.01001201-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019299EN.01001201-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
088P15-5

#### Mason White Hyde v. Katie Poole

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Habeas Corpus*

Denied 12/12/2016

Ervin, J., recused
292P13-2

#### State v. Jose Ismael-Ruiz Zuniga

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for Petition for Writ of Error

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed as moot
Exhibit 31

                             DEPOSITOR CERTIFICATION

      Re:   GSR Trust 2005-HEL1 (the "Trust") Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series
            2005-HEL1, issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of December
            29, 2005 (the "Indenture"), between GSR Trust 2005-HEL1, as issuer
            (the "Issuer") and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as
            indenture trustee (the "Indenture Trustee")

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual
Report"), and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution reports
(collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this Annual Report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicer under the Sale
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 29, 2005 (the "Sale and Servicing
Agreement"), among GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as depositor (the "Depositor"),
the Issuer, Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as originator and servicer (the
"Servicer"), the Indenture Trustee and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company, as seller
(the "Seller") for inclusion in the Reports is included in the Reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Indenture
Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, and
except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement; and

            5. The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the Sale and Servicing Agreement, that is
included in the Reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Indenture
Trustee and the Servicer.


Date: March 30, 2006
     --------------------------


/s/ Michelle Gill
-------------------------------
Michelle Gill
Vice President
362P15-2

#### State v. Bryant T. Dennings

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court of Cumberland County

2. Defs *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Allowed

3. Dismissed as moot
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CALVIN MORRIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 222 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 142 

Expressing the opposition of Congress to Federal efforts to establish a carbon 

tax on fuels for electricity and transportation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2012 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. UPTON, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

WHITFIELD, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. SHIMKUS, and 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the opposition of Congress to Federal efforts 

to establish a carbon tax on fuels for electricity and 

transportation. 

Whereas affordable and abundant electricity from coal and 

natural gas is a strategic resource that is essential to 

modern life, America’s economic competitiveness, and, ultimately, independence from foreign and volatile sources 

of energy; 

Whereas the application of a carbon tax to gasoline and other 

transportation fuels will have a dramatic, immediate impact on transportation costs, with the greatest impact 

being felt by low-income Americans and their families; 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HCON 142 IH 

Whereas a carbon tax is designed to result in substantial, immediate increases in the price of electricity, making electricity less affordable for millions of Americans; 

Whereas a carbon tax applicable to coal and natural gas electricity generation would be punitive and harmful to the 

American people by artificially raising electricity costs; 

Whereas, with continuing high national joblessness and an 

unemployment rate exceeding 7.8 percent every month 

since February 2009, a carbon tax will drive the unemployment rate even higher; 

Whereas a carbon tax is likely to have an uneven effect, hitting different regions of the country and segments of the 

economy much more severely than others; 

Whereas a carbon tax is regressive and will impose the greatest burden on low-income individuals and families who already spend the largest share of their income on energy 

and are least able to afford a carbon tax; 

Whereas economic modeling of Australia’s recently implemented carbon tax shows that it increases energy costs, 

and reduces growth in GDP, productivity, and household 

incomes; 

Whereas a carbon tax in the United States will have no impact on China, India, and other major sources of carbon 

emissions throughout the world, except to increase their 

competitiveness with the United States; and 

Whereas a carbon tax will put United States exporters at a 

competitive disadvantage by increasing domestic manufacturing production costs: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress opposes Federal efforts to esVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:55 Nov 30, 2012 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HC142.IH HC142

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HCON 142 IH 

1 tablish a carbon tax on fuels for electricity and transpor2 tation. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with
#### ILLONA v. CURTIS CENTER

3236 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

February Term, 2016 No. 000949, (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                                   
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                             
|View History:                                                                                    
|                                                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Number of Underground Storage Depleted Fields Capacity  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 9     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 9      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 8      | 9     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 9      | 10     | 10     | 10     | 10     | 10     | 11     | 10     | 10    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 10     | 10     | 10     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
050P17

#### State v. Robert Wayne Smith

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to the Denial of *Writ of Mandamus*

Denied

Ervin, J., recused

Hudson, J., recused
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|South Dakota Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|South Dakota Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 86     | 4      | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 30     | 25     | 21     | 19     | 19     | 17     | 10     | 1     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Order entered November 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01306-CV

SEVEN HILLS COMMERCIAL, LLC, Appellant

V.

MIRABEL CUSTOM HOMES, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-1206312D

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ November 18, 2013 agreed motion for an extension of time to 

file their brief. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appellees on November 22, 2013 

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31

                         CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY
                     NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
                                 WITH FORM 10-K


      I, Kevin Cloyd, certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of New Century Home
Equity Loan Trust 2005-D, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-D;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: JPMorgan Chase
Bank, National Association and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.


                                        NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Kevin Cloyd
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin Cloyd
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: 3/29/06
No. 12-323.

#### Hall *v.*Kentucky.

Ct. App. Ky. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.2
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Section 1350
Certification
  In connection with the
Annual Report of Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James O’Shaughnessy,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:
  (1)  The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date:  March 19,
2008
   /s/
      James O’ShaughnessyJames
      O’Shaughnessy
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
No. 12-6099.

#### Broussard *v.*Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.