alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Montana Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Montana Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 14.44  | 2.06   | 2.01  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.81   | 7.54   | 3.95   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | --     | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | 4.31   | 2.39   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Indiana Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Indiana Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |         |         | 4,661   | 13,678  | 12,515 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 14,513  | 17,777  | 35,104  | 26,672  | 22,946 | 35,376  | 27,213  | 37,871  | 34,312  | 36,576 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 61,242  | 85,298  | 115,328 | 81,013  | 82,361 | 127,964 | 174,685 | 132,684 | 196,219 | 222,085
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 230,450 | 205,077 | 233,990 | 256,346 |        |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27048-27049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service.


Notice of Proposed Change to Section IV of the Field Office 
Technical Guide (FOTG) of the Natural Resources Conservation Service in 
Kentucky

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in Kentucky, U.S. 
Department of Agriculture.


[[Page 27049]]


ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed changes in Section IV of the 
FOTG of the NTCS in Kentucky for review and comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: It is the intention of the NRCS in Kentucky to issue revised 
conservation practice standards: Composting Facility (Code 317), 
Grassed Waterway (Code 412), Heavy Use Area Protection (Code 561), 
Obstruction Removal (Code 500), and Waste Management System (Code 312).

DATES: Comments will be received until June 15, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquire in writing to David G. Sawyer, 
State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 
771 Corporate Drive, Suite 110, Lexington, KY 40503-5479. Copies of the 
practice standards are made available upon written request.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: Section 343 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 states that revisions made after 
enactment of the law to NRCS State Technical Guides used to carry out 
highly erodible land and wetland provisions of the law shall be made 
available for public review and comment. For the next 30 days the NRCS 
in Kentucky will receive comments relative to the proposed changes. 
Following that period a determination will be made by the NRCS in 
Kentucky regarding deposition of those comments and a final 
determination of change will be made.

    Dated: April 13, 1998.
William N. Craddock,
Acting State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 
Lexington, KY.
[FR Doc. 98-10827 Filed 5-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-M
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 60 

Expressing the sense of Congress that United States commercial air carriers 

should provide certain benefits to members of the Armed Forces who 

are traveling on official military orders and are being deployed overseas 

or are returning from an overseas deployment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2011 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself, Mr. PIERLUISI, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

BRALEY of Iowa, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. CARNAHAN, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. 

GUINTA, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. SCHILLING, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. RUNYAN, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. 

QUAYLE, Mr. YODER, Mr. REED, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. HECK, Mr. MACK, 

Mr. DOLD, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Ohio, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. KISSELL, Mr. COSTA, Mr. GARY G. 

MILLER of California, Mr. MICA, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. CARSON

of Indiana, Mr. COBLE, Mr. RICHMOND, and Mrs. ELLMERS) submitted 

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that United States commercial air carriers should provide certain benefits to 

members of the Armed Forces who are traveling on 

official military orders and are being deployed overseas 

or are returning from an overseas deployment. 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces carry their personal 

and military equipment on aircraft when being deployed 

overseas or returning from an overseas deployment; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 60 IH 

Whereas individual members of the Armed Forces have been 

charged as much as $200 for checked baggage when returning from an overseas deployment; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces should not have to 

endure personal financial hardship as a result of serving 

our country; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces make great sacrifices, 

including putting their lives in danger, to defend our 

country; and 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces traveling on official 

military orders should be provided with all reasonable 

and available accommodations when on commercial aircraft: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that each 

3 United States commercial air carrier should provide to any 

4 member of the Armed Forces who is traveling on official 

5 military orders and is being deployed overseas or is return6 ing from an overseas deployment— 

7 (1) priority with respect to aircraft boarding; 

8 (2) priority with respect to seat upgrades, when 

9 available; and 

10 (3) a waiver of all baggage fees. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Montana Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Montana Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 420    | 522    | 291   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 192    | 161    | 116    | 259    | 195    | 213    | 544    | 1,000  | 513    | 656   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 705    | 4,681  | 5,370  | 4,906  | 5,662  | 6,558  | 5,363  | 4,688  | 5,129  | 5,495 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,426  | 5,693  | 7,106  | 10,081 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
III 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. RES. 704 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Election Law 

Guidebook. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2010 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate 

Election Law Guidebook. 

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration shall prepare a revised edition of the Senate Elec3 tion Law Guidebook, Senate Document 109–10, and that 

4 such document shall be printed as a Senate document. 

5 SEC. 2. There shall be printed, beyond the usual 

6 number, 500 additional copies of the document specified 

7 in the first section for the use of the Committee on Rules 

8 and Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# Table 8.7

# RSE 8.7
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|No chart available.                                                 
|No chart available.                                                 
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Virginia Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 45 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 45

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2011

 Mr. Broun of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Akin, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. 
 Walsh of Illinois, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Miller of 
 Florida, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Latta, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Roe of 
Tennessee, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Burton of Indiana, 
Mr. Chabot, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Benishek, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Duncan of South 
    Carolina, Mr. Neugebauer, and Mr. Westmoreland) introduced the 
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
                         relating to marriage.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. This article may be cited as the `Marriage Protection 
Amendment'.
    ``Section 2. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of 
the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the 
constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage 
or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than 
the union of a man and a woman.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 15 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to authorize 

the line item veto. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2011 

Mr. PLATTS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to authorize the line item veto. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 15 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘In the case of any bill, order, resolution, or vote 

3 which is presented to the President under section 7 of Ar4 ticle I, the President may decline to approve in whole any 

5 dollar amount of discretionary budget authority, any item 

6 of new direct spending, or any tax benefit. A matter which 

7 the President declines to approve under this article of 

8 amendment shall be returned with his objections to the 

9 House in which it originated, and shall be treated in the 

10 same manner as a bill which the President returns without 

11 signing under section 7 of Article I.’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ISIAC FULTON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 2414

[ January 26, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 06001647CFBXMX

.

Isiac Fulton, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and A RTAU , JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Charles Edward MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2919

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Pat Siracusa, Judge.

Affirmed.