alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Illinois Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Illinois Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,048,895
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,023,874 | 981,904   | 1,112,815 | 1,234,731 | 1,328,116 | 1,388,479 | 1,498,747 | 1,475,069 | 1,221,336 | 1,325,077
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,391,241 | 1,698,828 | 1,547,601 | 1,824,428 | 1,815,994 | 1,912,671 | 1,812,882 | 2,011,543 | 2,022,380 | 2,146,637
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,565,698 | 2,561,463 | 2,464,407 | 2,398,988 | 2,242,317 | 1,874,035 | 1,562,998 | 1,682,166 | 1,707,525 | 1,487,342
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,162,770 | 1,030,570 | 1,176,845 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 706 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 706

Extending the authority for the Senate National Security Working Group.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 2010

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Kerry, and Mr. Kyl) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Extending the authority for the Senate National Security Working Group.

    Resolved, That Senate Resolution 105 of the One Hundred First 
Congress, 1st session (agreed to on April 13, 1989), as amended by 
Senate Resolution 149 of the One Hundred Third Congress, 1st session 
(agreed to on October 5, 1993), as further amended by Senate Resolution 
75 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress, 1st session (agreed to on March 
25, 1999), as further amended by Senate Resolution 383 of the One 
Hundred Sixth Congress, 2d session (agreed to on October 27, 2000), as 
further amended by Senate Resolution 355 of the One Hundred Seventh 
Congress, 2d session (agreed to on November 13, 2002), as further 
amended by Senate Resolution 480 of the One Hundred Eighth Congress, 2d 
session (agreed to November 20, 2004), as further amended by Senate 
Resolution 625 of the One Hundred Ninth Congress, 2d Session (agreed to 
on December 6, 2006), and as further amended by Senate Resolution 715 
of the One Hundred Tenth Congress, 2d session (agreed to November 20, 
2008), is further amended in section 4 by striking ``2010'' and 
inserting ``2012''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019089EN.01000102.xml

| 8.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9264 — The Carlyle Group/StandardAero)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 89/02)

On 27 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9264. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9264. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 99.2  -  a) & b) Management Assertion as to compliance with
		minimum servicing standards for the year ended
		December 31, 2005

Wachovia Corporation
NC0572
201 South College Street. 17th Floor
Charlotte Plaza Building
Charlotte, NC 28244



WACHOVIA [logo]



Management Assertion


Management of Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Administrator,
and Wachovia Education Finance Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Wachovia Bank, National Association (the Company), as Master Servicer,
for Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1, is responsible for assessing
compliance with applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Wachovia
Student Loan Trust 2005-1, except for servicing criteria 1.iii., 2.iii.,
4.v., 4.x.a., 4.x.b., 4.x.c., 4.xi., 4.xii., and 4.xiii., which the
Company has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs
with respect to Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1 and servicing criteria
2.i., 4.i., 4.ii., 4.iv., 4.vii., 4.viii., and 4.ix., which the Company
has determined were activities performed by subservicers for all loans
owned by Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1, as of and for the period
from November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust) to December 31, 2005.

The Company's management has assessed the effectiveness of the
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the period from November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust)
to December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for
the period from November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust) to
December 31, 2005, the Company has complied in all material respects
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB
of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the servicing of Wachovia
Student Loan Trust 2005-1, except for servicing criteria 1 .iii., 2.iii.,
4.v., 4.x.a., 4.x.b., 4.x.c., 4.xi., 4.xii., and 4.xiii., which the Company
has determined as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with
respect to Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1 and servicing criteria 2.i.,
4.i., 4.ii, 4.iv., 4.vii., 4.viii., and 4.ix., which the Company has
determined were activities performed by subservicers for all loans owned
by Wachovia Student Loan Trust 2005-1 as of and for the period from
November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust) to December 31, 2005.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the period from
November 29, 2005 (Inception of the Trust) to December 31, 2005.

/s/ Ricardo Ramirez				March 27, 2006
Ricardo Ramirez					    Date
Senior Vice President
Wachovia Education Finance Inc.

/s/ John M. Gordon				March 27, 2006
John M. Gordon					    Date
Vice President, Asset Backed Servicing
Wachovia Bank, National Association
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Vermont Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Vermont Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.70  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.04   | 2.80   | 2.86   | 2.14   | 2.14   | 2.53   | 2.97   | 2.83   | 2.62   | 2.78  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.28   | 5.69   | 4.33   | 5.79   | 6.39   | 8.25   | 8.25   | 8.51   | 9.74   | 6.34  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.54   | 5.81   | 4.90   | 5.72   | 6.61   | 5.31   | 3.81   | 3.88   | 4.01   | 2.87  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.25   | 3.70   | 6.04   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
1 Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Jason Toth <jason@rvrd.com> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 11:57 AM To: Ngo, Dan (FAA) Cc: Daniels, Nia (FAA) Subject: FAA-2014-0938 - Jason Toth

Good day Dan,
Thank you for your phone call.
The UAV’s we will currently use (until our RVRD Rapture X8 is approved by FAA) are:

- DJI Inspire 1

- DJI Phantom 3

- DJI S900

- DJI S1000

- DJI Matrice 100

- Freefly Cinestar

- Freefly Alta
Please let us know when the Rapture is approved, this is the only UAV we trust for high-end work with large payloads (total weight of 50lbs), everything else we have tried faile d our requirements for redundancy and safety.
I’m currently in Canada at the address below if you need to send hard copies:

Revered Cinema Canada 2211 West 15th Ave Vancouver BC V6K2Y6
Thank you, Jason 604-339-5782

Jason Toth | Drones, Film Equipment Rentals, Sales | 1.888.681.TOTH (8684) | 1.888.309.RVRD (7873) | jason@rvrd.com | www.rvrd.com
1

ALD-237 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 16-1452

___________

IN RE: AKEEM R. GUMBS,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

District Court of the Virgin Islands

(Related to D.V.I. Crim. No. 3-11-cr-00021)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

April 28, 2016

Before: AMBRO, SHWARTZ, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: May 5, 2016)

_________

OPINION*

_________

PER CURIAM

Akeem R. Gumbs petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to have this Court 

direct the District Court of the Virgin Islands to set a date for an evidentiary hearing in 

connection with his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We will deny the 

petition.

 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not 

constitute binding precedent.
2

A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy that is invoked only in extraordinary 

situations. See Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). To warrant relief, a 

petitioner must show: (1) both a clear and indisputable right to the writ, and (2) that he 

has no other adequate means to obtain the relief desired. See Haines v. Liggett Group 

Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir. 1992) (citing Kerr, 426 U.S. at 403). 

A district court retains discretion over the manner in which it controls its docket, 

see In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig., 685 F.2d 810, 817 (3d Cir. 1982), but an appellate 

court may issue a writ of mandamus when an “undue delay is tantamount to a failure to 

exercise jurisdiction[.]” Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996), superseded in 

part on other grounds by 3d Cir. L.A.R. 24.1(c). Here, there is no basis for granting the 

petition for a writ of mandamus on the basis of undue delay. While Gumbs claims that 

his § 2255 motion was pending for nearly a year before the Government filed its 

response,1 nothing we would do at this point could alter that situation. The docket 

reflects that Gumbs filed a reply to the Government’s response on January 4, 2016. The 

matter has thus been ripe for decision or scheduling of an evidentiary hearing for about 

four months.2 We do not hesitate to conclude that this period of time does not rise to the 

level of undue delay. We see no reason to believe that the District Court will not 

 

1 We note that Gumbs filed a number of amended motions during that time.

2

In any event, we would not ordinarily direct a district court, via mandamus, to hold an 

evidentiary hearing as district courts have the discretion to determine in the first instance 

whether such a hearing is necessary. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2255 

Proceedings; see also Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473 (2007). 
3

adjudicate the motion in due course. Thus, we conclude that there is no basis here for an 

extraordinary remedy.

Because our intervention is not warranted, we will deny the petition for a writ of 

mandamus.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------





                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


         I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
         on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in
         respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual
         report, of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-J14;

         2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
         a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
         omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
         in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
         not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
         annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under
         the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in
         these reports is included in these reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar,
         agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance
         review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the
         reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
         agreement; and

         5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards
         based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,
         after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single
         Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set
         forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
         included in these reports.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
         information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
         Bank of New York, as Trustee, Chevy Chase Bank, FSB, Provident
         Funding Associates, LP, Third Federal Savings & Loan Association and
         Wachovia Mortgage Corporation.



         Date: March 27, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11469]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: National Science Foundation, National Science 
Board.

DATE AND TIME:
May 6, 1998, 1:30 p.m., Closed Session
May 7, 1998, 9:30 a.m., Open Session
May 7, 1998, 12:30 p.m., Closed Session
May 7, 1998, 2:30 p.m., Open Session

PLACE: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1225, 
Arlington, VA 22230.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. Part of this 
meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Wednesday, May 6, 1998

Closed Session (1:30 p.m.-2:00 p.m.)

--Minutes, February 1998
--National Science Board and Executive Committee Elections

Thursday, May 7, 1998

Open Session (9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m.)

--Presentation on Third International Mathematics & Science Study 
(TIMSS)
--Science & Engineering Indicators Web Demonstration
--NOVA Demonstration

Thursday, May 7, 1998

Closed Session (12:30 p.m.-2:30 p.m.)

--Executive Committee Election
--Awards and Agreements
--NSF Budget & Long Range Planning

Thursday, May 7, 1998

Open Session (2:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m.)

--Minutes, February 1998
--Closed Session Items for August 1998
--Chair's Report
--Director's Report
--Executive Committee Annual Report
--NSB Annual Calendar
--NSB Logo

Thursday, May 7, 1998

Open Session (2:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m. continued)

--Final Report of the NSB Chairman ``Teaching & Learning for the 
21st Century'' (Report of the TIMSS Task Force)
--Committee Reports
--Other Business
--Adjourn
Marta Cehelsky,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-11469 Filed 4-24-98; 4:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
No. 12-405.

#### Starr *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
No. 12-6043.

#### Rosado *v.*Pennsylvania.

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.