alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 46 Received in Senate (RDS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 46

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 12, 2011

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace 
                      Officers' Memorial Service.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' 
              MEMORIAL SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police 
and its auxiliary (in this resolution

              

 referred to as the ``sponsor'') shall be permitted to sponsor a public 
event, the 30th Annual National Peace Officers' Memorial Service (in 
this resolution referred to as the ``event''), on the Capitol Grounds, 
in order to honor the law enforcement officers who died in the line of 
duty during 2010.
    (b) Date of Event.--The event shall be held on May 15, 2011, or on 
such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the 
Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate jointly designate.

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect 
of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event shall be--
            (1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and
            (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS.

    Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 
sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 
sound amplification devices, and other related structures and 
equipment, as may be required for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
144P16

#### State v. Anton Tolandis Smith

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-921)

2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. State’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

i.—

2. Denied

3. Allowed
|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                
|View History:                                                                                 
|                                                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              
|                                                                                              
|Missouri Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.81   | 2.26   | 2.66  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.42   | 4.69   | 3.32   | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W      | W     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | W      | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board ofDirectors and Shareholders 

Mercury General Corporation: 

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss)income for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. These condensed consolidated financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It issubstantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken asa whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should bemade to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries asof December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 27, 2009,we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. 

As discussed in note 2 to the December 31, 2008consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 159, *The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,*as of January 1, 2008. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

LosAngeles, California 

November 3, 2009
#### State v. Labroi

105,730

08/29/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
#### COM. v. JENNINGS, K.

3790 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

CP-15-CR-0002518-2015 (Chester)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Alabama Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 70,276  | 86,092  | 96,699  | 102,106 | 102,348 | 112,354 | 124,750 | 123,389
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 130,337 | 165,850 | 349,609 | 382,435 | 509,625 | 514,388 | 525,480 | 578,635 | 558,451 | 527,385
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 499,589 | 343,056 | 341,235 | 334,852 | 300,888 | 282,769 | 265,155 | 250,576 | 240,662 | 218,797
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 203,873 | 178,310 | 208,577 | 188,651 | 174,016 | 162,433 | 160,541 | 146,818 | 135,430 | 126,879
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 114,235 | 104,185 | 93,813  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Dickey

110,325

110,326

110,327

10/07/2015

Granted

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10437]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Council on Drug Abuse, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) on May 19-20, 1998, at the National 
Institutes of Health, Natcher Building 45, 9000 Rockville Pike, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    On May 19, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., the meeting will be held in 
Conference Rooms E1, E2, G1 and G2. In accordance with provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and 
section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, this portion of the meeting will be 
closed to the public for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
grant applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    On May 20, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., the meeting will be held in 
Conference Rooms E1 and E2. This portion of the meeting will be open to 
the public for annoncements and reports administrative, legislative, 
and program developments in the drug abuse field. Attendance by the 
public will be limited to space available.
    A summary of the meeting and a roster of committee members may be 
obtained from Ms. Camilla L. Holland, NIDA Committee Management 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, Parklawn Building, Room 10-42, 
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, (301/443-2755).
    Substantive program information may be obtained from Dr. Teresa 
Levitin, Room 10-42, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, 
Maryland 20857, (301/443-2755).
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Dr. Levitin in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.277, 
Drug Abuse Research Scientist Development and Research Scientist 
Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs)

    Dated: April 14, 1998.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 98-10437 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2019352EN.01000801.xml

| 18.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9518 — CPPIB/EQT/BNVC Group Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 352/08)

On 11 September 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9518. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9518. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 66 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in the Burmese 

Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. PITTS, Mr. HOLT, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. MCCOTTER, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Approving the renewal of import restrictions contained in 

the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress approves the renewal of the import restric4 tions contained in section 3(a)(1) and section 3A (b)(1) 

5 and (c)(1) of the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act 

6 of 2003. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------



                         COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


          CWHEQ, INC. REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2005-L
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2005-L


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 24, 2006
------------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March 24, 2006
------------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
: .g~erabl4 6eo. 80 Shepprd - page 8 

am umd in the appropriation blllr is a ‘reetlng of 

sabers or delegatam at a prlrate organlration, party, 

olub, sooaietj, or the like.' See our Opinion Ilb. O1737. The oharaotsr ot the organiaatlon a4 'prltate' 

or 'orflalal' dspmda, not alane upon ltm purpo44, 

but alma upon Its umnbermblp. The Constitution and 

Bplaws ot the Amaoclaflon rev481 that the amsoolation 1~ 8. 'private organldatlon~'a 

In Opinion No. O-17S7, addramssd to State bqmrtmamt 

4i BduOatlon, we ditt4rentlatsd as tollorrrr 

*Obviously It oould not hare boon Intended by 

the t4glaIatw4 that the re4trlotiou again& pamg 

trarellng axpenres to oonrmtlons should apply to 

l utborisod mebfinga eallod by agesselse ot goremment tor tho pur.poSe of aaaampliahln~ tho funotiona 

at gotommmt imposwl upon thmm. To apply suoh a 

oonatruotion roold bo to impute to tha I~e~slaturo 

the latent to paralflo bj lndlreotlon the l dninlatratian ot ths very 8tSalrs ot gorornmmt tar whioh 

a propriatlms 44re aado at 14agth in S~tato Bill 

4 g 7 ot tho 46th ~oglalaturo. We are lmp%lled, 

therefore, to tbo caaolud4n that the Legimlaturo 

used the word ooonraation' %n ita eqteolal or popular, rather than its broad, l lgni?ioan4e, oonv4jlng 

the idea, generally, ot a wetlng ot mombora or dolt 

gatea ot a private organiiatlanr party, club, sesietj, 

or the like, tar the l oeampliaboent at some oommon 

object.' 

Texas $atety A4a44latlon , Ina., is a prirak lnoorporatltm ormnia4d an~~malnta~n4d by persons Intorested in the &anoral subjeot ot sat&y through regulatlonr sad la in notice a State 

*getray or lnstmmamtalltp , al thou& Ita l otlritloo as a prl*ate 

organiaatlon i.m In the general interest 0t the pub116 reltaro. 

In Opinion lo. O-8467 wo cbrleod you, am Gomptroltor ot 

Fubllo AOoOtmta, with respoot to the 4p4OiilO aonstruation ot the 

lanpra~e, “which written Opinion (of the Attoner Osn4ral) shall 

hare been filed In l dranoe 41th tho State Cmptrollsr', aa followar 

'In r44p44t to tho question submitted, the abar 

lang~~age quoted Worn s* B. 487 IS plain and unambiguo&as* Va note your statement that tbe argument is u&e 

to you that the word 'adran44'P as ured In the rldor, 
~oaorable Geo. 8. Sheppard - page 4 

means In advance at payment and not in adrance ot maklne the trip. Bowever, the language ot the Aat Is 

too al early otherwise. It slmpl~ admits of no other 

aonstruetlon than that out ot State expenses must not 

be j.nourred until the written statement of the Attorna, General has been obtained and tiled with the Camptroller ad.vlsln~ that the purpose ot the provosed 

trip Is tor State business purp~aes-~ 

We reattlrm that holding. 

We trust that what we hare said satlstactorlly ane~ers 

iour lnqulry~ 

Very tNly pours 

ATTORNEY GENERAI. OF TEXAfi 

BY 

Oale &ear) 

Assistant
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 16563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Monday, April 28, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Floor Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-9001 Filed 4-3-97; 3:48 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M