alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019211EN.01000601.xml

| 21.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2019/C 211/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 13.05.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.52088 (2018/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | PUGLIA | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Misura 16 Cooperazione — “Sottomisura 16.2: sostegno a progetti pilota ed allo sviluppo di nuovi prodotti, pratiche, processi e tecnologie”. |
| Legal basis | Programma di Sviluppo Rurale (PSR) 2014-2020 della Regione Puglia approvato dalla Commissione Europea con Decisione C(2015) 8412 del 24.11.2015, ratificata con deliberazione della Giunta regionale della Puglia n.2424 del 30.12.2015, e successive modifiche. Determinazione dell’Autorità di Gestione n. 222 del 12/10/2018 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Aid for co-operation in forestry sector, Aid for co-operation in rural areas |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 25 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Forestry and logging, Manufacture of food products |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Gianluca Nardone
  LUNGOMARE NAZARIO SAURO, 45/47 — 70121 BARI |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

13.05.2019

Aid number

SA.52088 (2018/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

PUGLIA

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Misura 16 Cooperazione — “Sottomisura 16.2: sostegno a progetti pilota ed allo sviluppo di nuovi prodotti, pratiche, processi e tecnologie”.

Legal basis

Programma di Sviluppo Rurale (PSR) 2014-2020 della Regione Puglia approvato dalla Commissione Europea con Decisione C(2015) 8412 del 24.11.2015, ratificata con deliberazione della Giunta regionale della Puglia n.2424 del 30.12.2015, e successive modifiche. Determinazione dell’Autorità di Gestione n. 222 del 12/10/2018

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Aid for co-operation in forestry sector, Aid for co-operation in rural areas

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 25 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Forestry and logging, Manufacture of food products

Name and address of the granting authority

Gianluca Nardone

LUNGOMARE NAZARIO SAURO, 45/47 — 70121 BARI

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          3,052
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 164,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,407
<INVENTORY>                                   114,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              294,311 
<PP&E>                                        176,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                 67,761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                458,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         135,059
<BONDS>                                        46,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,775
<OTHER-SE>                                    200,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  458,652
<SALES>                                       424,360 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              424,360
<CGS>                                         212,366         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 176,708 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                30,596
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,025
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            18,571
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 Amendment (this “Amendment”), dated as
of March 12, 2012 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by Constellation Energy Group, Inc., a Maryland corporation (together with its successors and assigns, the “Corporation”), to the Replacement Capital
Covenant, dated June 27, 2008 (the “Replacement Capital Covenant”), entered into by the Corporation in favor of and for the benefit of each Covered Debtholder (as defined in the Replacement Capital Covenant). 

Recitals 

A. On June 27, 2008, the Corporation entered into the Replacement Capital Covenant in connection with the issuance of $450,000,000
aggregate principal amount of its Series A Junior Subordinated Debentures. 
 B. Pursuant to Section 4(b) of the
Replacement Capital Covenant, the Corporation may amend the Replacement Capital Covenant without the consent of the Holders of the then-effective Covered Debt if such amendment is not adverse to the Holders of the then-effective Covered Debt and an
officer of the Corporation delivers to such Holders a written certificate to that effect. 
 C. The intent and effect of this
Amendment is to recognize, for purposes of calculating qualified replacement capital under the Replacement Capital Covenant, the proceeds from the issuance of any and all securities specified in Section 2 of the Replacement Capital Covenant
after the Amendment Effective Date, without regard to the date of such issuance. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation
hereby amends each Replacement Capital Covenant as set forth in this Amendment. 
 SECTION 1. Definitions.
(a) Capitalized terms used herein (including in the Recitals) and not otherwise amended or defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Replacement Capital Covenants. 

(b) The definition of the term “Measurement Period” as set forth in Schedule I to the Replacement Capital Covenant is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced in its entirety with the following definition: 
 “‘Measurement Date’
means March 12, 2012.” 
 SECTION 2. Amendment of Section 2 of the Replacement Capital Covenant.
Section 2 of the Replacement Capital Covenant is hereby amended by replacing the words “within the applicable Measurement Period (without double counting proceeds received in any prior Measurement Period)” in subsection
(a) thereof with the words “on or after the Measurement Date (without counting any received proceeds more than once for the purpose of the limitations set forth in this Section 2).” 

SECTION 3. Miscellaneous. (a) Except as expressly amended hereby, all of the provisions of the Replacement Capital
Covenants continue in full force and effect. 
 (b) This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws
of the State of New York. 







 EXECUTION VERSION 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to Replacement Capital Covenant to be executed by a duly authorized officer as of the day and year first above written. 

 

					
	CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher J. Budzynski

		 	Name:	 	Christopher J. Budzynski
		 	Title:	 	Assistant Treasurer
# C_2019166EN.01000501.xml

| 15.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9351 — DIF/Green Investment Group/Covanta/Dublin Waste-to-energy facility)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 166/02)

On 7 May 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9351. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)    
|View History: Annual                              
|View History: Annual                              
|View History:                                     
|                                                  
|Indiana Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                  
|                                                  
|Indiana Natural Gas Processed (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 191    | 102    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Exhibit 33.3
                                 ------------

            [LETTERHEAD OF AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC.]


American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.'s Report on Assessment of Compliance
with Servicing Criteria

The undersigned has caused an assessment to be made of the servicer's
compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Regulation AB.

American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (the "Asserting Party") is responsible
for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006 and for the period from
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the
servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR"), except for those portions of criteria
229.1122(d)(3)(ii) - pertaining to amounts due to investors are allocated and
remitted in accordance with distribution priority and other terms as set forth
in the transaction agreements, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not
applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the
asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). The Asserting Party has engaged vendors to perform
certain portions of criteria 1122(d)(4)(iv) and 1122(d)(4)(xi) for which it
has elected to take responsibility. The Platform includes all residential
mortgage loans serviced by the asserting party (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2006 and for the Reporting Period and has
concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a
whole.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report on the undersigned's assessment of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the
Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



Date:  March 1, 2007                      American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.


                                                   By /s/ Michael Strauss
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Michael Strauss
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                   By /s/ Steve Hozie
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Steve Hozie
                                                      Chief Financial Officer

                                                   By /s/ David Friedman
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      David Friedman
                                                      Executive Vice President
Order filed January 12, 2023 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00861-CV

____________

IN RE FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-49530

ORDER

On October 29, 2019, relator FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the 

Honorable Dedra Davis, presiding judge of the 270th District Court of Harris 

County, to vacate her October 28, 2019 order denying FedEx’s motions to quash 

subpoenas and for protective orders. We conditionally granted FedEx’s petition on 

May 28, 2020. 

Real party in interest Zach Brown filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the 

Texas Supreme Court, seeking relief from this court’s ruling. On September 9, 2022,

the Supreme Court granted Brown’s petition in part and directed this court to vacate 

our order granting relief quashing brown’s trial subpoena and address whether Rule 
176 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure applies in this case. 

On January 6, 2023, the parties advised this court that they have reached a 

settlement of all claims and requested that we abate this case so that they may finalize 

the settlement. We grant the motion.

The original proceeding is abated for a period of thirty days from the date of 

this order, at which time the parties are directed to advise the court of the status of 

the settlement. The original proceeding is treated as a closed case, and removed 

from this court’s active docket. The original proceeding will be reinstated on this 

court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original 

proceeding or other dispositive motion. The court also will consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original 

proceeding on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-305-000]


ANR Pipeline Co.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

April 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on March 31, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, the tariff sheets 
which ANR proposes to be effective May 1, 1997:

Second Revised Volume No. 1
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 17
Original Volume No. 2
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 14

    ANR states that the referenced tariff sheets are being submitted to 
update the ``Eligible Throughout Actually Experienced'' as required by 
Sections 26.4 and 27.3 of the General Terms and Conditions of ANR's 
FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised Volume No. 1 to adjust the Order No. 528 
Volumetric Buyout Buydown Surcharge and Upstream Pipeline Surcharge, 
commencing May 1, 1997.
    With respect to the Volumetric Buyout Surcharge, the proposed 
changes are designed to recover the same amount on an annual basis as 
is designed in the currently effective Buyout Buydown Volumetric 
Surcharge. With respect to the Upstream Pipeline Surcharge, the 
proposed charges are designed to recover $0.2 million less on an annual 
basis than the currently effective Upstream Pipeline Surcharge.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 
and 385.211 of the Commission's Regulations. All such motions or 
protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a part must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this 
application are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-9026 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
377A16

#### Robert Sain and Jennifer Sain v. Cobblestone Homeowners Association of Clayton, Inc., a North Carolina nonprofit corporation

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent (COA15-1302)

2. Def’s Motion to Consolidate Appeals

i.-10/13/2016

2. Allowed 10/13/2016
Order entered September 19, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00195
- CR
KEVIN DEWAYNE JOHNSO N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 81811
- 2015



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeal. On August 19, 2016, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief had not been filed. We ADOPT t he trial court’s findings that (1) appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, (2) appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without costs, and (3) appellant’s court

- appointed counsel can file the brief by September 26, 2016. Accordingly, the Court ORD E RS appellant to file the brief on or before September 26,
2016

.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
231P16

#### Ervin Rainey, Employee v. City of Charlotte, Employer, and Self-Insured, Carrier

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COÁ15-953)

Denied
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, R. Ray Bell, Principal Accounting Officer of Marine Petroleum Trust, certify
that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Marine Petroleum
          Trust;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report; and

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report.

Date: November 14, 2002


                                                  /s/ R. RAY BELL
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  R. Ray Bell
                                                  Principal Accounting Officer