alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 38 

Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2011 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. MATSUI, and 

Mr. LATOURETTE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Robert P. Kogod as a 

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Robert P. Kogod 

8 of the District of Columbia, on May 5, 2011, is filled by 

9 the reappointment of the incumbent. The appointment is 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HJ 38 IH 

1 for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of May 6, 

2 2011, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11223]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) has submitted 
the following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the 
Office of Management and Budget for review and approval.

Summary of Proposal(s)

    (1) Collection title: Placement Service.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: ES-2, ES-20a, ES-20b, ES-21, ES-21c, UI-35, 
and Job Vacancies Report.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0057.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: 7/31/1998.
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for 
profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 13,750.
    (8) Total annual responses: 27,000.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 1,494.
    (10) Collection description: Under the RUIA, the Railroad 
Retirement Board provides job placement assistance for unemployed 
railroad workers. The collection obtains information from job 
applicants, railroad and non-railroad employers, and State Employment 
Service offices for use in placement, for providing referrals for job 
openings, reports of referral results, and for verifying and monitoring 
claimant eligibility.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Officer Building, Washington, DC 10503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-11223 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
052P16

#### David Easter-Rozzelle, Employee v. City of Charlotte, Employer, Self-Insured

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-594)

2. Pit’s Motion for Leave to File PDR Out of Time

3. Pit’s Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

1. Dismissed

2. Denied

3. Allowed
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.4

                                    Addendum

Employer:  NetEase.com, Inc.
Employee:  William Ding

The above parties have agreed that with effect from May 1, 2003, the
remuneration a set out in paragraph 4(a) of the original employment agreement
(the Agreement) dated August 12, 1999 will be lowered to Rmb1,000. All other
terms in the Agreement remain unchanged.

/s/William Ding                         /s/Denny Lee
-------------------------               ---------------------------------------
William Ding                            For and on behalf of NetEase.com, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 9 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 9

 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
     relating to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
    Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and 
          Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2011

 Mr. Carter (for himself and Mr. Cole) introduced the following joint 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
     relating to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 
    Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and 
          Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the 
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the 
Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for 
Portland Cement Plants (published at 75 Federal Register 54970 
(September 9, 2010)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|Mississippi Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 34,714 | 30,656 | 29,383
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 23,756 | 12,641 | 12,036 | 7,288  | 9,421  | 6,293  | 5,553  | 5,646  | 5,630  | 9,882 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 13,009 | 9,311  | 8,767  | 7,048  | 7,788  | 7,552  | 18,913 | 22,091 | 38,948 | 30,390
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 36,262 | 23,929 | 24,993 | 14,092 | 12,083 | 11,321 | 9,366  | 8,414  | 9,830  | 6,286 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6,353  | 6,194  | 5,975  | 6,082  | 8,069  | 9,906  | 8,522  | 4,682  | 2,998  | 3,039 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 3,480  | 3,788  | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
LOCK-UP AGREEMENT



 EXHIBIT 10.11 
  
 LOCK-UP AGREEMENT 
  
 April 15, 2003 
  
 Next, Inc. 
 7625 Hamilton Park Drive 
 Suite 12 
 Chattanooga, TN 37431 
  
 In consideration for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Mark Carter (“Stockholder”)
agrees that Stockholder will not, directly or indirectly, sell, offer, contract or option to sell (including without limitation any short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an open “put equivalent position” within the meaning of Rule
16a-l(h) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise dispose of any equity securities (the “Shares”) of Next, Inc. (“Next”), or publicly announce Stockholder’s intention to do any of the foregoing,
for a period commencing on the date hereof and, subject to the paragraph immediately following, continuing for twelve (12) months thereafter (the “Lock-Up Period”). Stockholder agrees and consents to the entry of stop transfer instructions
with Next’s transfer agent and registrar precluding the transfer of Shares held by Stockholder except in compliance with the restrictions set forth herein. 
  

This Agreement shall terminate immediately should Next fail to timely file any mandatory disclosure documents with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. 
  
 This Agreement is irrevocable unless at least
three independent directors of Next’s board of directors approves any amendment or termination hereof, and will be binding on Stockholder and Stockholder’s respective successors, heirs, personal representatives and assigns. 
  
 Very truly yours, 
  
 /s/ Mark Carter 
  
 Mark Carter 
  
 Agreed and Accepted: 
  
 Next, Inc. 
  
  
 By: /s/ Dan F.
Cooke                                        

             Dan F. Cooke, CEO
I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e),
for the registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report for conclusions about the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation;

c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|/s/ Terry A. Hanson                                                            
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
        November 13, 2003
#### In the Matter of Christine Burroughs, Petitioner, *v.*Nassau County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

October 27, 1971.

*Leonard S. Clark*and *Burr C. Hollister*for petitioner. *Joseph Jaspan, County Attorney,*for respondent.

Sol Wachtler, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, judgment is granted in favor of petitioner directing respondent to make restricted payments for petitioner’s utility payments pending a hearing to be held by respondent.

There is no doubt that respondent has the authority to make restricted payments of utilities on behalf of a recipient of public assistance where ‘ ‘ the inability of an applicant or recipient to handle cash has been demonstrated” (18 NYCRR 381.3 [a] ; see, also, 381.4[a]; *Summers*v. *Wyman,*64 Misc 2d 67, affd. 36 A D 2d 795). Of course, whether the recipient is unable to handle cash, except in an obvious situation (cf. *Summers*v. *Wyman, supra)*is a matter within the administrative discretion of respondent. However in exercising that discretion, respondent should consider applications for restricted payments upon the particular facts and not on a broad policy basis (cf. *Young*v. *Shuart,*67 Misc 2d 689).

There is no indication in the answering papers submitted on this proceeding of any evidence upon which respondent could have determined that petitioner was not able to handle cash.

Respondent asserts that petitioner is barred from maintaining this proceeding by the provisions of CPLR 7801 (subd. 1) in that she has failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, i.e., by requesting a fair hearing. It is the opinion of this court that a proper hearing upon which the facts in this case might be presented for the purpose of demonstrating either inability or ability to handle cash is desirable. In fact it is precisely such a hearing that this court in its judgment will direct. However, in light of the approach taken by respondent to the request for restricted payments and in order to prevent the loss of electricity *397to a mother and four children, this interim relief is justified (cf. *Matter of Yakkey*v. Shuart, 65 Misc 2d 859; *Young*v. *Shuart, supra).*
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

KENNETH BROWN,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 2016

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 5195, Judge Joseph L. Falvey, Jr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

G ALINA I. F OMENKOVA , Commercial Litigation Branch,Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , B RENDAN D AVID J ORDAN , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY , L OREN M ISHA P REHEIM ; B RIAN D. G RIFFIN , A NDREW J. S TEINBERG , Office of General Counsel, Case: 22-2016 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 03/11/2024United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Washingt on, DC

.

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , B RYSON , and S TARK , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 11 , 2024 Date Case: 22-2016 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 03/11/2024
No. 12-6416.

#### Rodriguez, aka Rodriguez-Lopez v. United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Infrared Spectrum 

Lot Number SANITIZED
#### COM. v. SANCHEZ-SALOMON, J.

2095 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

7/17/2017

CP-36-CR-0002616-2016

(Lancaster)

Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134750 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ERIC A. BRAVERMAN, Successor Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Estate Justices of Patricia Swann, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 134750 COA: 264091 Wayne CC: 05-502345-NH GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, a/k/a GARDEN CITY HOSPITAL, OSTEOPATHIC, Defendant-Appellant, and

JOHN R. SCHAIRER, D.O., GARY YASHINSKY, M.D., ABHINAV RAINA, M.D., and PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERS, INC., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 12, 2007, the applica tion for leave to appeal the June 5, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pending the decision in

Braverman v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-6). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on April 9, 2008, 480 Mich 1159 (2008), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court.

l0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
#### S.A. v. S.M.

1655 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

16 FC 40874

(Lackawanna)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. PUPPO, J.

3136 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/19/2017

CP-13-CR-0001138-2014 (Carbon)

Affirmed
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00494

- CV

SAMUEL KADYEBO APPELLANT

V.

CJ HERITAGE APTS. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

- -----------

We have considered appellant 's “ Appellant 's Motion To Dismiss Appeal

With Prejudice .” It is the court = s opinion th at the motion should be granted. We

deny “Appellee’s Motion To Dismiss Appellant’s Appeal” as moot.

We dismiss the appeal. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: May 31, 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 625 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 625

     Designating September 2010 as ``National Preparedness Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2010

Mr. Lieberman submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Designating September 2010 as ``National Preparedness Month''.

Whereas a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or other emergency could strike 
        any part of the United States at any time;
Whereas natural and manmade emergencies disrupt hundreds of thousands of lives 
        each year, costing lives and causing serious injuries and billions of 
        dollars in property damage;
Whereas Federal, State, and local officials as well as private entities are 
        working to deter, prevent, and respond to all types of emergencies;
Whereas the people of the United States can help promote the overall emergency 
        preparedness of the United States by being prepared for all types of 
        emergencies;
Whereas National Preparedness Month provides an opportunity to highlight the 
        importance of public emergency preparedness and to encourage the people 
        of the United States to take steps to be better prepared for emergencies 
        at home, work, and school;
Whereas the people of the United States can prepare for emergencies by taking 
        steps such as assembling emergency supply kits, creating family 
        emergency plans, and staying informed about possible emergencies; and
Whereas additional information about public emergency preparedness may be 
        obtained through the Ready Campaign of the Department of Homeland 
        Security at www.ready.gov or the American Red Cross at www.redcross.org/
        preparedness: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates September 2010 as ``National Preparedness 
        Month''; and
            (2) encourages the Federal Government, States, localities, 
        schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and other 
        applicable entities along with the people of the United States 
        to observe National Preparedness Month with appropriate events 
        and activities to promote emergency preparedness.
                                 <all>
```
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 94 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2012, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public 

4 Law 112–36) is further amended by striking the date 
2 

•HJ 94 EH 

1 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 17, 

2 2011’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 94 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2012, and for other purposes.
#### State v. Gehring

111,346

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished