alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5  



	 	 	Aspen Technology, Inc. Ten Canal Park	 	[phone] 617 949 1000	 	[world wide web] www.aspentech.com
	 	 	Cambridge MA 02141-2201 USA	 	[fax] 617 949 1030	 	[e-mail] info@aspentech.com





[ASPENTECH LOGO] 


June 24,
2003 


Mr. Manolis
Kotzabasakis

Senior VP Engineering Product Business Unit (PBU) 


Dear
Manolis: 


        I
am pleased to confirm that the Compensation Committee of the AspenTech Board of Directors has approved the following FY04 Executive Compensation Plan for you. This Plan is contingent
upon shareholder approval of the Advent financing transaction, which is currently scheduled for August 2003. 



        Your
total target compensation for FY04 will be $334,000, which is comprised of a base salary of $230,000 and a bonus target of 45%. The actual bonus you earn will be determined by your
achievement of FY04 goals. I will communicate the details of the FY04 bonus program to you in early Q1 once the program has been finalized and approved by the Compensation Committee. 


        In
the event your employment is terminated other than for cause prior to June 24, 2006, you will be entitled to receive severance in an amount equal to your annual base salary
then in effect, payable over 12 months in accordance with AspenTech's semi-monthly payroll schedule. 



        In
addition, you will be granted options to purchase 331,700 shares of AspenTech common stock at the Fair Market Value on the day the Advent transaction is approved by shareholders. This
grant, together with your existing option holdings, would bring your total equity participation level to approximately 0.400%, based on options with grant prices of $10/share or lower on a
pre-reverse split basis. In consideration for this substantial new grant, the following condition applies, contingent upon closing of the Advent transaction and issuance of the options: 



	•
	For
your existing stock options with pre-split grant prices of $10/share or lower, you agree to only exercise these options in accordance with their normal
vesting schedule. In the event of your involuntary termination, or a change of control event as redefined in the 2001/2003 stock option plan and described in the proxy statement for the Advent
transaction, this restriction will be lifted. 




        Manolis,
I look forward to our continued work together as we drive shareholder value. 


Best
regards, 



	/s/ David L. McQuillin
 David L. McQuillin

President and CEO

Aspen Technology, Inc.	 	/s/ Manolis Kotzabasakis
 Manolis Kotzabasakis

Senior VP Engineering PBU

Aspen Technology, Inc.	 	June 24, 2003
 Date
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 83 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 83

  Designating March 25, 2009, as ``National Cerebral Palsy Awareness 
                                 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 2009

    Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating March 25, 2009, as ``National Cerebral Palsy Awareness 
                                 Day''.

Whereas the term ``cerebral palsy'' refers to any number of neurological 
        disorders that appear in infancy or early childhood and permanently 
        affect body movement and the muscle coordination necessary to maintain 
        balance and posture;
Whereas cerebral palsy is caused by damage to 1 or more specific areas of the 
        brain, which usually occurs during fetal development, before, during, or 
        shortly after birth, or during infancy;
Whereas the majority of children who have cerebral palsy are born with the 
        disorder, although cerebral palsy may remain undetected for months or 
        years;
Whereas 75 percent of people with cerebral palsy also have 1 or more 
        developmental disabilities, including epilepsy, intellectual disability, 
        autism, visual impairments, and blindness;
Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released 
        information indicating that cerebral palsy is increasingly prevalent and 
        that about 1 in 278 children have cerebral palsy;
Whereas approximately 800,000 people in the United States are affected by 
        cerebral palsy;
Whereas, although there is no cure for cerebral palsy, treatment often improves 
        the capabilities of a child with cerebral palsy;
Whereas scientists and researchers are hopeful that breakthroughs in cerebral 
        palsy research will be forthcoming;
Whereas researchers across the United States are conducting important research 
        projects involving cerebral palsy; and
Whereas the Senate is an institution that can raise awareness in the general 
        public and the medical community of cerebral palsy: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates March 25, 2009, as ``National Cerebral Palsy 
        Awareness Day'';
            (2) encourages all people in the United States to become 
        more informed and aware of cerebral palsy; and
            (3) respectfully requests the Secretary of the Senate to 
        transmit a copy of this resolution to Reaching for the Stars: A 
        Foundation of Hope for Children with Cerebral Palsy.
                                 <all>
```
---

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFESP RESOURCES, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of ESP Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for
the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chris Metcalf, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my
knowledge, that:

| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s / CHRIS METCALF Chris MetcalfChief Financial OfficerMarch 23, 2010

This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5947-2]


Local Government Advisory Committee; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 
Local Government Advisory Committee (LGAC) will be renewed for an 
additional two-year period, as a necessary committee in the public 
interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. appl.2 section 9(c). The purpose of LGAC is to 
provide advice and counsel to the Administrator of EPA on issues 
associated with enhancing the Agency's partnership with local 
governments in order to provide more efficient and effective 
environmental protection. It is determined that LGAC is in the public 
interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the 
Agency by law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Zabinski Ney, Designated 
Federal Officer, LGAC, U.S. EPA, 401 M Street, SW (1502), Washington, 
DC 20460 or via electronic mail at <<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630d061a4d07060d0a1006230613020e020a0f4d0613024d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d63687423696863647e684d687d6c606c646123687d6c236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>>.

    Dated: December 29, 1997.
Denise Zabinski Ney,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-112 Filed 1-2-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
331A16

#### State v. Amanda Gayle Reed

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-363)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Dissent

1. Allowed 09/06/2016

2. Allowed 10/20/2016

3.-
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|No chart available.                                                  
|No chart available.                                                  
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|Tennessee Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                          
|                                                                                       
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       
|                                                                                       
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports to Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 3.06   | 2.12   | 1.81   | 2.02   | 2.00  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.70   | 1.91   | 1.83   | 2.14   | 2.42   | 1.96   | 2.67   | 2.52   | 2.25   | 2.35  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.66   | 3.97   | 3.35   | 6.03   | 6.47   | 7.80   | 7.32   | 7.17   | 8.86   | 4.59  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.84   | 4.45   | 3.17   | 4.17   | 6.10   | 3.15   | 2.60   | 3.12   | 3.41   | 2.78  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.06   | 3.87   | 6.49   | 2.64   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### PARAISO GARDENS, LLC, etc., et al., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. LD ACQUISITION COMPANY 8, LLC, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 3D16-1346

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-29333

Dismissed.
No. 12-6151.

#### Hall *v.*Virga, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### COM. v. GROVE, B.

1934 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/05/2017

CP-14-CR-0000873-2018 (Centre)

Remanded Jurisdiction Retained
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Ohio Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Ohio Natural Gas Plant Liquids Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        | 20     | 23     | 29     | 41     | 67     | 68     | 50     | 44     | 46    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 58     | 49     | 72     | 95     | 104    | 94     | 85     | 83     | 78     | 78    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 78     | 86     | 72     | 68     | 58     | 29     | 5      | 9      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 155    | 2,116  | 33,332 | 59,490 | 70,451 | 59,669 | 62,570 | 51,980
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 49,359 | 46,575 | 47,893 |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. APRIL JEAN ANDERSON

No. 432PA15

Filed 23 September 2016

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals,_N.C. App._, 780 S.E.2d 758 (2015), finding no error after appeal from judgments entered on 16 July 2014 by Judge Linwood O. Foust in Superior Court, Catawba County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 31 August 2016.

*Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kimberley A. DArruda, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.*

*James N. Freeman, Jr. for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kristie Marie Lowery v. Jonathan Guerrero and Thuy Julie 

Nguyen

Appellate case number: 01-20-00816-CV

Trial court case number: 1146100

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

On December 4, 2020, appellant, Kristie Marie Lowery, filed a notice of restricted 

appeal from the trial court’s September 16, 2020 Final Judgment, entered in favor of 

appellees, Jonathan Guerrero and Thuy Julie Nguyen. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c), 30 

(party that “did not participate . . . in the hearing that resulted in the judgment complained 

of” may file notice of appeal “within six months after the judgment or order is signed”). 

On February 5, 2021, appellant filed a “Joint Motion to Vacate the Trial Court’s 

Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal” with this Court. In the motion, appellant states that 

“[t]he parties jointly move to vacate” the trial court’s September 16, 2020 Final Judgment, 

pursuant to the terms of a December 30, 2020 settlement agreement between the parties. 

Appellant requests this Court to either render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement 

or set aside the trial court’s judgment without regards to the merits and remand the case to 

the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A)-(B).

While appellant has stated that the motion is “joint,” the motion is not signed by 

appellees or their counsel, nor has appellant provided this Court with any evidence of an 

agreement between the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2) (“The appellate court may 

dispose of an appeal . . . [i]n accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their 

attorneys and filed with the clerk . . .”). Further, the motion includes a certificate of 

conference stating that counsel for appellant “conferred via e-mail . . . with counsel for 

[a]ppellees . . . regarding the merits of this motion.” However, the certificate of conference 

fails to state whether counsel for appellees were opposed to the relief requested in the 

motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5).
Accordingly, we deny appellant’s “Joint Motion to Vacate the Trial Court’s 

Judgment and Dismiss the Appeal.” Nothing in this order prevents the parties from filing 

a new motion, seeking the relief requested in appellant’s motion, that complies with the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Amparo Guerra______

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 11, 2021_______