alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Pennsylvania Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.61   | 4.15   | 3.99  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.12   | 7.18   | 6.29   | 8.12   | 8.97   | 11.25  | 12.30  | 10.64  | 12.09  | 9.19  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.23   | 9.86   | 9.58   | 9.13   | 9.95   | 8.59   | 7.40   | 8.38   | 8.69   | 8.52  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 7.98   | 8.51   | 11.17  | 11.28  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019376EN.01000101.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/1

---

Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/01)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.acer.europa.eu/en/The_agency/Organisation/Administrative_Board/Pages/Opinions.aspx

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Pipeline Holdings, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.



/s/ EDWARD E. COHENEdward E. CohenChief Executive Officer of the General PartnerMarch 3, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO RULE 13a—14(a) OF THE****SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, Howard Gross, Interim Chief Executive Officer of Eddie Bauer Holdings, Inc. (“Eddie Bauer”),certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Eddie Bauer; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: March 28, 2007/s/ HowardGross
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Warroad, MN Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Warroad, MN Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 685    | 512    | 473    | 412   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4,576  | 5,318  | 5,374  | 4,925  | 4,793  | 4,982  | 3,563  | 4,813  | 4,800  | 4,380 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4,325  | 4,551  | 4,610  | 4,835  | 3,997  | 3,968  | 4,335  | 4,489  | 4,012  | 3,930 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 4,011  | 3,957  | 4,082  | 3,899  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 75 (Monday, April 20, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10293]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-158-002]

NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 14, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 7, 1998, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(``NGT'') tendered for filing copies of the following revised tariff 
sheets to be effective May 8, 1998:

Fourth Revised Volume No. 1

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 169
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 169A
Original Sheet No. 169B

    In compliance with the March 31, 1998 order issued by the 
Commission in Docket No. RP98-158-001, these tariff sheets add a 
description, in Section 1.1 of the Tariff's General Terms and 
Conditions, of the ten Pools that were established within NGT's 
existing Pooling Areas on April 1, 1998.
    NGT states that a copy of this filing has been mailed to each of 
NGT's customers and to each interested state commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10293 Filed 4-17-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 58 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 58

     Expressing disapproval of United States intervention in Libya.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 2, 2011

Mr. Turner (for himself, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Harris, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Brady 
    of Pennsylvania, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. 
    Woodall, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California, Mr. Wilson of South 
   Carolina, Mr. Schilling, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Smith of New 
  Jersey, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. 
 Boustany, Mr. Issa, Mr. Rigell, Mr. Walsh of Illinois, Mr. Cole, Mr. 
 Heck, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Terry, Mr. West, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. 
 Nugent, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Young of Indiana, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. 
 Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Labrador, 
  Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Shuster, Mr. 
     Franks of Arizona, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Carter, Mr. 
Farenthold, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Petri, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Broun 
   of Georgia, Mr. Kucinich, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Posey, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
   Brooks, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Jones, Ms. Foxx, Mr. 
   Palazzo, Mr. Landry, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Bass of New Hampshire, Mr. 
Barletta, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Young 
of Alaska, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Flake, Ms. Herrera Beutler, Mr. Griffith 
    of Virginia, and Mr. Hunter) submitted the following concurrent 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing disapproval of United States intervention in Libya.

Whereas the President initiated military actions in Libya on March 19, 2011, 
        thereby invoking the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.): 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. DISAPPROVAL OF UNITED STATES INTERVENTION IN LIBYA.

    Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1544(c)), Congress does not approve United States intervention in 
Libya.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration on Aging


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget for Clearance

AGENCY: Administration on Aging, HHS.
    The Administration on Aging, Department of Health and Human 
Services, is submitting the following proposal for the collection of 
information in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 96-
511): Supplemental Form to the Financial Status Report (SF-269), Title 
III of the Older Americans Act, Grants for State and Community Programs 
on Aging.
    Type of Request: ``Reinstatement, without change.''
    Use: To continue an existing information collection, Supplemental 
Form to the Financial Status Report, from Title III grantees to use in 
reporting information on programs funded by Title III as required under 
section 304, section 307, and section 308) of the Older Americans Act, 
as amended;
    Frequency: Semiannually.
    Respondent: State Agencies on Aging.
    Estimated number of responses: 57.
    Estimated Burden Hours: \1/2\ hour per State agency.
    Additional Information or Comments: The reporting system would 
become effective in fiscal year 1998. The reporting form would include 
the following elements:
    <bullet> Use of Program Income;
    <bullet> Recipient share of outlays;
    <bullet> State Administrative Activities;
    <bullet> Area Plan Administration;
    <bullet> Unobligated Funds; and
    <bullet> Disbursed Program Income.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to the following address within 30 days of 
the publication of this notice: Office of Regulatory Affairs, ATTN: 
Allison Herron Eydt, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10325, Washington, DC 
20503.
Jeanette C. Takamura,
Assistant Secretary for Aging.
[FR Doc. 98-10995 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Global Traffic Network, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    By:
    /s/ William L. Yde IIIWilliam L. Yde III, Chief Executive Officerand President (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Cory Nicholas WAUGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-1782

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Frank Marriott, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### Corey Anthony JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-3816

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2017

*522Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

CASANUEVA, Judge.

Corey Anthony Johnson appeals his convictions for driving while license suspended, fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer, depriving an officer of means of protection or communication, resisting an officer with violence, felony battery, criminal mischief, and resisting an officer without violence. He argues on appeal, and the State correctly concedes, that his convictions and sentences for both resisting an officer with violence and resisting an officer without violence violate double jeopardy principles.

Mr. Johnson’s vehicle was stopped by police when he failed to stop at a stop sign. During the traffic stop, Mr. Johnson was accused of resisting the officer with violence for repeatedly punching the officer, and he was also accused of resisting the same officer without violence by thereafter fleeing and ignoring the officer’s commands to stop. “[C]ourts have uniformly held that separate convictions for resisting arrest with violence and resisting arrest without violence are prohibited when the acts of resisting occurred as part of a single criminal episode.” Williams v. State, 959 So.2d 790, 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); see also Ruiz-Alegria v. State, 14 So.3d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In determining whether the charges relating to the acts of resisting are part of one criminal episode, “a defendant’s continuous resistance to a single ongoing attempt to effectuate his arrest constitutes a single episode of resisting.” Williams, 959 So.2d at 793. Furthermore, when a defendant flees from officers and is therefore arrested at a different location from where he was originally detained, it does not transform the single continuous resistance into separate criminal episodes. Id. In the present case, Mr. Johnson’s attempt to flee directly followed his striking the officer, and consequently, the two charges were part of one criminal episode. Therefore, the convictions for both offenses violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy.

Accordingly, we reverse Mr. Johnson’s conviction for resisting arrest without violence and remand for resentencing. Mr. Johnson’s remaining convictions are affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.

KELLY and BADALAMENTI, JJ„ Concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019239EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/3 |

---

Notice of the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

(2019/C 239/04)

In accordance with Article 9(4) of Council Directive 2009/119/EC of 14 September 2009 imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019239EN.01000301-E0001), Denmark hereby notifies its undertaking to maintain specific stocks.

1.

The level of the specific stocks that Denmark undertakes to maintain is equivalent to 30 days of average daily consumption.

2.

The undertaking applies to the period from 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020.

3.

The specific stocks will be composed of the following product categories:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Motor gasoline |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Gas/diesel oil |

4.

The stocks will be owned and held by the central Danish stockholding entity, Foreningen Danske Olieberedskabslagre (FDO).

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019239EN.01000301-E0001)  [OJ L 265, 9.10.2009, p. 9](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2009_265_R_TOC).

---
No. 11-556.

#### Vance *v.*Ball State University et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 567 U. S. 933.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
#### BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Council of the City of Pittsburgh, and William Peduto, and Service Employees International Union Local 32 BJ Petition of: Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ Building Owners and Managers Association of Pittsburgh v. City of Pittsburgh, Council of the City of Pittsburgh, and William Peduto, and Service Employees International Union Local 32 BJ Petition of: Service Employees International Union Local 32 BJ

No. 229 WAL 2017

No. 230 WAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 29, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2017, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal are GRANTED, limited to the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all other issues.

The issue, rephrased for clarity, is as follows:

> Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that the State Emergency Management Services Code, the State Disease Prevention and Control Act Law, the Second Class City Code, and the Home Rule Charter and Options Law failed to satisfy the “expressly provided by statute” exception, and that the City of Pittsburgh therefore lacked the authority to pass the Paid Sick Days Act and the Safe and Secure Buildings Act?

The appeals from Nos. 227-230 WAL 2017 and Nos. 236-239 WAL 2017 are hereby CONSOLIDATED for briefing and oral argument.