alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 67 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 67

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2011

    Ms. Norton (for herself and Mr. Denham) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On September 30, 2011, or on such other date as the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration 
of the Senate may jointly designate, the 26th Annual District of 
Columbia Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution 
referred to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as 
part of the journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of 
Columbia Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Idaho Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Idaho Natural Gas Imports Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.04  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.12   | 2.01   | 1.83   | 2.02   | 1.60   | 0.94   | 1.22   | 1.60   | 1.60   | 2.04  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.79   | 4.71   | 2.83   | 4.72   | 5.30   | 7.13   | 6.22   | 6.31   | 7.88   | 3.86  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.19   | 3.90   | 2.59   | 3.34   | 4.14   | 2.34   | 1.87   | 2.10   | 1.75   | 1.93  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.90   | 3.27   | 5.52   |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 97 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 97

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relating to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal 
                               elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2011

Mr. Yarmuth (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relating to contributions and expenditures with respect to Federal 
                               elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Financial expenditures, or in kind equivalents, with 
respect to a candidate for Federal office, without regard to whether or 
not a communication expressly advocates the election or defeat of a 
specified candidate in the election, shall not constitute protected 
speech, as guaranteed by this Constitution or any amendment to this 
Constitution.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enact a mandatory 
public financing system to provide funds to qualified candidates in 
elections for Federal office, which shall be the sole source of funds 
raised or spent with respect to Federal elections.
    ``Section 3. Congress shall set forth a legal public holiday for 
the purposes of voting in regularly scheduled general elections for 
Federal office.''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 62,431 | 43,152 | 70,540 | 127,627 | 34,011 | 37,954 | 24,996 | 24,468 | 26,390 | 50,274
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 52,544 | 63,090 | 48,534 | 82,189  | 70,689 | 50,446 | 69,287 | 69,517 | 54,365 | 36,179
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 51,513 | 35,470 | 42,797 | 61,950  | 51,123 | 50,039 | 33,749 | 50,167 | 45,362 | 41,298
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 36,487 | 33,575 | 26,955 | 42,270  | 64,056 | 50,561 | 40,015 | 42,868 | 50,454 | 47,769
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34,286 | 42,408 | 60,734 |         |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
280P16

#### Patricia B. Hoover v. George Barry Hoover

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1396)

Denied
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019130EN.01005601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/56 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9344 — Swiss Life/Montagu/Pondus)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 130/10)

1.

On 29 March 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019130EN.01005601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Swiss Life Holding AG (‘Swiss Life’, Switzerland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Montagu Private Equity LLP (‘Montagu’, United Kingdom), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Pondus GmbH & Co. KG (‘Pondus’, Germany). |

Swiss Life and Montagu acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of Pondus.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Swiss Life: an insurance company,

—   for Montagu: a private equity firm,

—   for Pondus: a real estate company that leases out a retail and office building in Berlin, Germany.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019130EN.01005601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9344 — Swiss Life/Montagu/Pondus

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019130EN.01005601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019130EN.01005601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### State v. Owens

108,985

08/04/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### In re: CONDEMNATION BY the PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, BUCKS COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania for the I-95 Interchange Project (Parcel ID No. 05-020-948) The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. ORANGE HILL, INC. and Martin/Petrone, L.P., Petitioners

No. 419 MAL 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 29, 2017

*981ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
#### Joe E. ROGERS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1449

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

Rehearing Denied October 18, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Daniel B. Merritt, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Nancy D. Parmelee, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 21, 2005





/s/ Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|South Dakota Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|South Dakota Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,557  | 6,106  | 6,219 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7,223  | 8,170  | 7,519  | 8,401  | 8,541  | 8,286  | 7,723  | 8,708  | 8,291  | 8,638 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8,543  | 8,480  | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, et al. v. ROBERT R. McCORMICK FOUNDATION, et al.

No. 16-317.

April 3, 2018.

Statement of

Justice KENNEDY and Justice THOMAS

respecting the petition for certiorari.

The parties are advised that consideration of the petition for certiorari will be *1163deferred for an additional period of time. This will allow the Court of Appeals or the District Court to consider whether to recall the mandate, entertain a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion to vacate the earlier judgment, or provide any other available relief in light of this Court’s decision in *Merit Management Group, LP v. FTI Consulting, Inc.,*583 U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 883, 200 L.Ed.2d 183 (2018). The petition for certiorari in this case was pending when the Court decided Merit *Management.*The Court of Appeals or the District Court could decide whether relief from judgment is appropriate given the possibility that there might not be a quorum in this Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2109.
391A16

#### Next Advisor Continued, Inc. v. Lendingtree, Inc., et al.

1. Defs’ Motion for Temporary Stay

2. Defs’ Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Defs’ Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of N.C. Business Court

4. Defs’ Motion to Amend and Supplement Record on Appeal

1. Denied

2. Denied

3. Denied

4. Dismissed as moot
Prelimin ary Regulatory Determinations 3 – Terbufos and Terbufos Sulfone References
##### 



GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED  2007 EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
 Plan Company
 Board
 ARTICLE I.
 CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
 Section 1.1 Base Compensation
 Section 1.2 Change in Control
 Section 1.3 Code
 Section 1.4 Committee
 Section 1.5 Common Stock
 Section 1.6 Director
 Section 1.7 Eligible Individual
 Section 1.8 Fair Market Value
 Section 1.9 Incentive Award Plan




---



##### 



Section 1.10 Paid Leave of Absence
 Section 1.11 Participant
 Section 1.12 Plan Year
 ARTICLE II.
 BONUS AWARDS
 Section 2.1 Participants; Bonus Awards
 Section 2.2 Performance Goals
 
    
    revenue;
    
    sales;
    
    cash flow;
    
    earnings per share of Common Stock (including earnings before any one or
more of the following: (i) interest, (ii) taxes, (iii) depreciation, and
(iv) amortization);
    
    return on equity;
    
    total stockholder return;
    
    return on capital;
    
    return on assets or net assets;
    
    income or net income;
    
    operating income or net operating income;
 2




---



##### 




    
    operating profit or net operating profit;
    
    operating margin;
    
    cost reductions or savings;
    
    research and development expenses (including research and development
expenses as a percentage of sales or revenues);
    
    working capital; and
    
    market share.
 GAAP
 Section 2.3 Adjustments to Performance Components
 
    
    items that are extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in
occurrence;
    
    items related to a change in accounting principle;
    
    items related to financing activities;
    
    expenses for restructuring or productivity initiatives;
    
    other non-operating items;
    
    items related to acquisitions;
    
    items attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by
the Company during the Plan Year;
    
    items related to the disposal of a business or segment of a business;
    
    items related to discontinued operations that do not qualify as a
segment of a business under GAAP; and
    
    any other items of significant income or expense which are determined to
be appropriate adjustments.
  3




---



##### 



Section 2.4 Award Limit
 Section 2.5 Other Incentive Awards
 ARTICLE III.
 PAYMENT OF BONUS AWARD
 Section 3.1 Form of Payment
 Section 3.2 Certification; Timing of Payment
 Section 3.3 Negative Discretion
 Section 3.4 Terminations
 Section 3.5 Change in Control
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV.
 SECTION 162(M) OF THE CODE
 Section 4.1 Qualified Performance Based Compensation
 Section 4.2 Performance Goals
   ARTICLE V.
 ADMINISTRATION
 Section 5.1
   Section 5.2 Duties and Powers of Committee
 5




---



##### 



Section 5.3 Determinations of the Committee or the Board
 Section 5.4 Majority Rule; Unanimous Written Consent
 ARTICLE VI.
 OTHER PROVISIONS
 Section 6.1 Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan
 Section 6.2 Effective Date Plan Effective Date
 Section 6.3 Approval of Plan by Stockholders
 Section 6.4 Tax Withholding
 6