alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History: Annual                                         
|View History:                                                
|                                                             
|Arizona Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Arizona Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,443,075
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,428,400 | 1,430,709 | 1,244,223 | 1,270,649 | 1,234,695 | 994,103   | 883,918   | 969,669   | 1,069,361 | 1,076,545
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,262,272 | 1,539,775 | 1,335,254 | 1,360,744 | 1,460,182 | 1,444,317 | 1,496,283 | 1,715,762 | 1,858,155 | 1,752,883
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,386,789 | 1,289,493 | 1,340,908 | 1,291,034 | 1,357,385 | 1,401,513 | 1,346,287 | 1,305,505 | 1,360,951 | 1,508,277
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,539,987 | 1,525,705 | 1,469,597 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA

#### SSD v. Franklin

27778

04/10/2017

Reversed (PD)
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           | 2,385     | 11,099    | 5,421     | 22,065    | 55,447   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 33,018    | 75,239    | 163,750   | 84,195    | 99,057    | 88,836    | 85,745    | 94,818    | 93,023    | 99,533   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 177,688   | 307,060   | 452,391   | 613,848   | 791,671   | 663,234   | 663,020   | 773,969   | 924,046   | 1,039,002
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,071,997 | 1,435,649 | 1,590,531 | 1,569,375 | 1,497,771 | 1,754,918 | 2,148,399 | 2,446,091 | 2,524,501 | 2,837,848
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,894,329 | 3,091,580 | 3,038,257 | 3,267,651 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
No. 12-6354.

#### Lemaster *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 114

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    relative to construing provisions of law as having been enacted 
      pursuant to the power of Congress to lay and collect taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2012

    Mr. Quayle introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
    relative to construing provisions of law as having been enacted 
      pursuant to the power of Congress to lay and collect taxes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``No provision of law shall be construed as having been made in 
execution of the power of Congress to lay and collect taxes unless such 
provision is explicitly designated by Congress as a tax in such 
provision.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 32 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States respecting 

the right to decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States respecting the right to decent, safe, sanitary, and 

affordable housing. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 32 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. All persons shall have a right to decent, 

3 safe, sanitary, and affordable housing, which right shall 

4 not be denied or abridged by the United States or any 

5 State. 

6 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en7 force and implement this article by appropriate legisla8 tion.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 39

  Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2011

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Becerra, Ms. Matsui, and Mr. 
   LaTourette) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Shirley Ann Jackson of New 
York, on May 5, 2011, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent. 
The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the later of May 
6, 2011, or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in North Dakota  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in North Dakota  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.29   | 4.18   | 3.94   | 3.59   | 3.42   | 3.12  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.07   | 3.49   | 3.28   | 3.29   | 3.15   | 2.58   | 2.94   | 3.38   | 2.81   | 3.07  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.60   | 4.82   | 3.68   | 5.79   | 6.93   | 8.54   | 7.82   | 7.04   | 8.03   | 5.16  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.50   | 5.06   | 4.43   | 4.99   | 6.37   | 4.46   | 3.88   | 4.28   | 3.82   | 3.57  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.27   | 6.44   | 7.11   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF STATUE OF GERALD R. FORD 

4 FROM THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN FOR 

5 PLACEMENT IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The statue of Gerald R. Ford fur7 nished by the people of Michigan for placement in the 
2 

•HCON 27 EH 

1 United States Capitol in accordance with section 1814 of 

2 the Revised Statutes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 

3 2131), is accepted in the name of the United States, and 

4 the thanks of the Congress are tendered to the people of 

5 Michigan for providing this commemoration of one of 

6 Michigan’s most eminent persons. 

7 (b) PRESENTATION CEREMONY.—The State of 

8 Michigan is authorized to use the Rotunda of the Capitol 

9 on May 3, 2011, for a presentation ceremony for the stat10 ue accepted under this section. The Architect of the Cap11 itol and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action 

12 as may be necessary with respect to physical preparations 

13 and security for the ceremony. 

14 (c) DISPLAY IN ROTUNDA.—The Architect of the 

15 Capitol shall provide for the display of the statue accepted 

16 under this section in the Rotunda of the Capitol, in ac17 cordance with the procedures described in section 311(e) 

18 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

19 U.S.C. 2132(e)). 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the acceptance of a statue of Gerald 

ment in the United States Capitol. R. Ford from the people of Michigan for place-
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of China GrenTech
Corporation Limited (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Gao Yingjie, as Chairman of the board of directors of the Company and
the Chief Executive Officer, and Yu Rong, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Gao Yingjie
-------------------
Name: Gao Yingjie
Title: Chairman of the board of directors and the Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 4, 2007

By: /s/ Yu Rong
---------------
Name: Yu Rong
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 4, 2007

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed "filed" by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section
H. Con. Res. 50 Agreed to May 12, 2011

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of 

Friday, May 13, 2011, or Saturday, May 14, 2011, on a motion 

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, May 

23, 2011, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 

2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first. 

SEC. 2. (a) The Speaker or his designee, after consultation 

with the Minority Leader, shall notify the Members to reassemble 

at such place and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, 

the public interest shall warrant it. (b) After reassembling pursuant 

to subsection (a), when the House adjourns on a motion offered 

pursuant to this subsection by its Majority Leader or his designee, 

the House shall again stand adjourned pursuant to the first section 

of this concurrent resolution. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 56 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Members of Congress, the President, 

and the Vice President should donate their salaries to the Treasury 

for reducing the national debt if members of the Armed Forces do 

not receive pay or allowances because of a shutdown of the Federal 

Government or because the Government is unable to fund such pay 

and allowances because the public debt limit has been reached. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2011 

Mr. FLORES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition 

to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that Members of Congress, 

the President, and the Vice President should donate their 

salaries to the Treasury for reducing the national debt 

if members of the Armed Forces do not receive pay 

or allowances because of a shutdown of the Federal 

Government or because the Government is unable to 

fund such pay and allowances because the public debt 

limit has been reached. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that if during 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 56 IH 

1 any period of a fiscal year interim or full-year appropria2 tions for the personnel accounts of the Armed Forces have 

3 not been enacted, or the Federal Government is unable 

4 to make payments from such accounts because the public 

5 debt limit under section 3101 of title 31, United States 

6 Code, has been reached, Members of Congress, the Presi7 dent, and the Vice President should donate any salary re8 ceived for that period to the Treasury for purposes of re9 ducing the national debt. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19715-19716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel 
Reviews; Notice of Termination of Panel Review

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of termination of panel review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A Notice of Consent Motion to Terminate the Panel Review of 
the final countervailing determination made by the Secretaria de 
Comercio y Fomento Industrial, respecting Hydrogen Peroxide Originating 
in the USA was filed by Electroquimica Mexicana S.A. de C.V. on 
November 24, 1997. The same company filed the First Request for Panel 
Review with the Mexican Section of the NAFTA Secretariat pursuant to 
Article 1904 of the North American Free-Trade Agreement. This panel 
review was assigned Secretariat File Number MEX-97-1904-01 by the 
Mexican Section. Pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Review, this panel review was terminated 
on December 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,

[[Page 19716]]

Washington, D.C. 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade 
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic 
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and 
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with 
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel 
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national 
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine 
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of 
the country that made the determination.
    Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on 
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were 
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). 
The Panel Review in this matter was conducted in accordance with these 
Rules.

    Dated: April 9, 1998.
James R. Holbein,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 98-10434 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-M