alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Arizona Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Percent of Commercial Natural Gas Deliveries in Arizona Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 95.7   | 93.2   | 92.6   | 91.5   | 90.7   | 88.4   | 85.2   | 84.5   | 85.0   | 82.5  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 83.7   | 92.6   | 92.8   | 90.7   | 93.5   | 93.3   | 93.1   | 93.4   | 93.1   | 88.0  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 88.7   | 87.8   | 86.6   | 85.5   | 84.4   | 83.7   | 75.3   | 81.1   | 81.7   | 81.5  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 81.8   | 81.5   | 80.5   | 81.0   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Virginia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Virginia  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.33   | 4.22   | 3.54   | 3.00   | 2.87   | 3.13  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3.09   | 2.76   | 2.91   | 3.33   | 3.44   | 2.92   | 3.89   | 4.14   | 3.74   | 3.81  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.34   | 6.76   | 6.75   | 6.57   | 7.61   | 10.12  | 10.51  | 9.27   | 10.61  | 8.20  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.88   | 6.64   | 5.64   | 5.54   | 5.98   | 4.87   | 3.99   | 4.53   | 4.69   | 4.52  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.87   | 5.07   | 7.42   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
426P06-2

#### State v. Billy Thomas Pearson

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP16-716)

Dismissed
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That pursuant to clause 4, section 5, article 

3 I of the Constitution, during the One Hundred Twelfth 

4 Congress the Speaker of the House and the Majority 

5 Leader of the Senate or their respective designees, acting 

6 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

7 House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, 
2 

•HCON 1 EH 

1 may notify the Members of the House and the Senate, 

2 respectively, to assemble at a place outside the District 

3 of Columbia if, in their opinion, the public interest shall 

4 warrant it. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 5, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of 

government.
|                            |  |            
|--------------------------- |  | -----------
|Subsidiaries of the Company |  | Exhibit 8.1



|                             |  |                               |  |                                        
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                   |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation |  | Principal Activity                     
|Banco del Tucumán S.A.       |  | Republic of Argentina         |  | Financial Institution                  
|                             |  |                              
|Macro Bank Limited           |  | The Bahamas                   |  | Banking Services                       
|                             |  |                              
|Macro Securities S.A.        |  | Republic of Argentina         |  | Securities Agent and Brokerage Services
|                             |  |                              
|Macro Fiducia S.A.           |  | Republic of Argentina         |  | Trust Services                         
|                             |  |                              
|Macro Fondos S.G.F.C.I. S.A. |  | Republic of Argentina         |  | Mutual Fund Administration
Swanson, Brian (OST) be^-O^r- tDOO-Cp'^tT^ 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) ,Vi'i-1t;V nliFMT/ Q/ r\z ^ 

Sent: Thursday, December29, 2011 2:50 PM ;'^i ' URMj/O/U 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST) '• - 0PFR^/:Of^:O 

Subject: FW: Answer to Pacific Wing's Petition for Reconsideration ' ' '''^'' ' 

^n .lAH 9 C O f. 

<•• 3 0 

Original Message 

From: Robin ConnorsOnps.gov Tmailto:Robin ConnorsOnps.govl 

Sent: Thunsdayj December 29, 2011 2:36 Pl^ 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Answer to Pacific Wing's Petition for Reconsideration 

I strongly oppose Pacific Wings' petition for reconsideration. Having 

frequent and affordable flights to and from Topside Molokai, and Honolulu 

has increased the well-being of our resident patient population through 

more frequent visits with their families. In addition, this has opened up 

the possibility for more opportunities for volunteers here at the National 

Parl< for much needed work details, for student groups participating in 

research field schools, and visiting scientists such as those who recently 

flew in on Makani Kai to study a rare marine mammal carcass on one of our 

beaches. Last year when the same type of mammal washed ashore, the 

research scientists had to hike down the trail with all their gear, then 

walk back up- being unable to afford the funding for Pacific Wings' 

exhorbitant fares. Please do not reconsider this petition. 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for Makani Kai. 

Robin Connors 

Archeologist, Cultural Resource Management 

Kalaupapa National Historical Park 

P.O. Box 2222 Kalaupapa, HI 96742 

Office: 898-567-6384 

Fax: 808-567-6408
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 24167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-5-34-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

April 27, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 23, 1998, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, effective May 1, 1998, the 
following tariff sheets:

Twenty-Seventh Revised Sheet No. 8A
Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 8A.01
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 8A.02
Twenty-Fourth Revised Sheet No. 8B
Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 8B.01

    FGT states that in Docket No. TM98-4-34-000 filed on February 26, 
1998 and approved by Commission order dated March 23, 1998, FGT filed 
to establish a Base Fuel Reimbursement Charge Percentage (Base FRCP) of 
3.46% to become effective April 1, 1998. In the instant filing, FGT is 
filing a flex adjustment of <0.50>% to be effective May 1, 1998, which, 
when combined with the Base FRCP of 3.46%, results in an Effective Fuel 
Reimbursement Charge Percentage of 2.9%.
    FGT states that the tariff sheets listed above are being filed 
pursuant to Section 27.A.2.b of the General Terms and Conditions of 
FGT's Tariff, which provides for flex adjustments to the Base FRCP. 
Pursuant to the terms of Section 27.A.2.b, a flex adjustment shall 
become effective without prior FERC approval provided that such flex 
adjustment does not exceed 0.5%, is effective at the beginning of a 
month, is posted on FGT's EBB at least five working days prior to the 
nomination deadline and is filed no more than sixty and at least seven 
days before the proposed effective date. The instant filing comports 
with these provisions and FGT has posted notice of the flex adjustment 
prior to the instant filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11576 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|Tennessee Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|Tennessee Natural Gas LNG Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 2,865  | 2,742  | 1,850  | 2,222  | 1,303  | 2,477  | 1,695  | 1,228  | 2,053  | 3,757 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,377  | 1,923  | 3,065  | 2,931  | 2,879  | 3,035  | 3,985  | 2,416  | 3,562  | 3,005 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,664  | 2,273  | 2,234  | 2,960  | 1,564  | 1,487  | 1,121  | 3,864  | 3,509  | 2,748 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,738  | 1,499  | 2,963  | 3,505  | 7,759  | 7,463  | 4,587  | 4,291  | 5,799  | 4,210 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,258  | 1,643  | 5,710  |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Florida Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 12,062 | 12,787 | 5,954  | 5,074  | 4,031  | 4,397  | 3,900  | 3,983 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 3,652  | 2,991  | 4,094  | 4,528  | 5,697  | 4,833  | 4,357  | 4,551  | 4,273  | 4,376 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,137  | 4,551  | 2,498  | 2,316  | 2,505  | 2,121  | 2,055  | 1,646  | 2,414  | 257   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12,409 | 15,125 | 773    | 292    | 263    | 529    | 496    | 500    | 576    | 564   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 483    | 711    | 707    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Wyoming Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Wyoming Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 103,831 | 103,830
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 106,130 | 106,130 | 105,668 | 105,668 | 105,668 | 105,668 | 105,868 | 105,868 | 105,868 | 105,868
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 105,868 | 106,000 | 115,068 | 114,187 | 114,160 | 114,160 | 114,096 | 114,067 | 111,167 | 111,120
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 111,120 | 106,764 | 124,937 | 157,985 | 157,985 | 157,985 | 157,744 | 155,995 | 155,995 | 139,947
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 155,995 | 155,995 | 155,995 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
# ~ECS Environmental Consulting 

## Services, LLP 451 FreedomAve. Phone: (406) 254-1741 Billings, MT 59105 Fax: (406) 254-1742 http://www.enviroconsult.com Email: ecsinfo@enviroconsult.com July 5 2005 

### \J. ViaEmailto: tglazier@mt.gov (No Hardcopyto follow) Ms. Trista Glazier MDEQAirResources ManagementBureau P.O. Box 200901 Helena, MT 59620 SUBJECT: Response to request for informationregarding the Sidney Sugars Inc. facility located in Sidney, MT on the Regional HazeRule Regulations.
DearMs. Glazier: Environmental Consulting Services, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit the enclosed information, at the direction of and on behalfof Sidney Sugars Inc., regarding the Sidney Sugars Inc. facility located in Sidney, MT on the Regional Haze Rule Regulations. You had requested certain information from Sidney Sugars Inc. within your letter dated May 26, 2005, with this request ofinformation specific to all new or reconstructed emission units that were in existence between August 7, 1962, and August 7, 1977. This information request appears to be specific to the Regional Haze Rule Regulations and to the upcoming State Implementation Plan (SIP) by the Montana Department ofEnvironmental Quality (MDEQ). According to the regulations in 40 CFR Part 51, the Sidney Sugars Inc. facility does not fall underneath any ofthe listed facilities and therefore may not be affected by this rule. Please review this and provide written correspondence regarding either exemption from the Regional Haze Rule or its' applicabilityto the Sidney Sugars Inc. facility. Even though the Sidney Sugars Inc. facility may not be affected by this rule, Sidney Sugars Inc. and ECS have performed a review of all potentially affected sources that meet the criteria of"existence" and/or "reconstruction" along with the potential to emit (PTE), as per the regulations in 40 CFR Part 51, and find that two units may be affected by this rule, althoughbothofthese units not only do not meet the descriptive criteria ofthe 40 CFRPart 51 regulationand are under the 250 MMBTU capacity. These two emissions units are identified as follows: UnionPacific Boiler EU003, installed during 1966, 130 MMBTU, PTE of>250TPY ofSOz (due to the option ofburning fuel oil) PulpDryer EU024A&B, installed during 1968,95MMBTU, PTE of>TPYofSOz Ifyou have any further questionsplease feel free to contact me. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTINGSERVICES,LLP

Kevin K. Walsh Partner/Consultant KKW/jlw

cc: Steve Sing, Sidney Sugars Inc. (via email to:ssing@crystalsugar.com)