alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|Washington Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 510,333
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 500,269 | 488,666 | 542,972 | 540,711 | 765,840 | 882,385 | 906,604 | 954,325 | 957,886 | 837,942
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 841,630 | 843,241 | 804,137 | 675,930 | 714,879 | 673,440 | 662,237 | 709,672 | 617,696 | 634,036
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 655,119 | 576,511 | 604,920 | 620,910 | 593,133 | 721,722 | 778,406 | 765,394 | 799,399 | 734,647
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 775,089 | 843,817 | 912,456 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6162.

#### Trotter *v.*Ayres et al.

Ct. App. Ga. Cer-tiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, DC. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

Carissa Cyran 

Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-20 13-0602. EPA-IIQ-OAR-2013-0603. and EPA-HQOAR-20 13-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings with stakeholders during the week of March 16, 2015. 

On March 17, Administrator Gina McCarthy spoke with Anthony Earley of Pacific Gas and 

Electric. 

On March 18. Administrator Gina McCarthy spoke to the Edison Electric Institute· s Board of 

Directors. 

On March 20. Associate Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel for Air and 

Radiati on Joseph Goffman met with representatives from General Electric. Sign-in sheet 

attached. 

On March 20. Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation Janet McCabe and Associate 

Assistant Administrator for Climate and Senior Counsel f·or Air and Radiation Joseph GotTman 

met with Vicki Patton. General Counsel for Environmental Defense Fund. Sign-in sheet 

attached. 

Internet Address (URL) • hnp 1/www epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnmed wllh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper 
Date: March 20, 2015 

Meeting: GE Follow Up Meeting 

Rule(s) Discussed: C P .P 

Written Materials? Yes.§ 

Name 

(i) th/{J) 

U I rJ) 

Organization Phone Number 

~ ~ 24_2 __ 

~~~~....!..___ --cr£ l-- &-->+-- Lj-z_c:;-7/ 

sr ~ ... 6-f '2-.ol)_- '2-<.;' /-o6·l.. <? 

~~~---~---u-~~-------- --------------~ 

L=-.

- 1-

L 

~e 

(( 

I ( 

I( 

1/ 

_j 

I 
Date: March 20, 2015 

Meeting: Meeting with Vicki Patton 

Rule(s) Discussed: pf 

Written Materials? Yes€;} 

Name 

~ I /) /} 

4/ivth!Mz 

~v llrM~P/1/!ff~ 

~· fl/J/J«//h//A -rr~;;:~ 

-

---

1;;(1 

Organization 

e-fJ4- 8;Y4- I 

\ 

tOr 

~li? 

Phone Number 

?J{) 2 ftt/ 7) ZJ{; 

( I 

I l I( I ( 

I I 

2a Jn 3>«) 

I 

-
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 102 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2012 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 102 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for a year shall not exceed 

3 the average annual revenue collected in the three prior 

4 years, adjusted in proportion to changes in population and 

5 inflation. Total outlays shall include all outlays of the 

6 United States except those for payment of debt, and rev7 enue shall include all revenue of the United States except 

8 that derived from borrowing. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. Two-thirds of each House of Congress 

10 may by roll call vote declare an emergency and provide 

11 by law for specific outlays in excess of the limit in section 

12 1. The declaration shall specify reasons for the emergency 

13 designation and shall limit the period in which outlays 

14 may exceed the limit in section 1 to no longer than one 

15 year. 

16 ‘‘SECTION 3. All revenue in excess of outlays shall 

17 reduce the debt of the United States. Upon the retirement 

18 of such debt, revenue in excess of outlays shall be held 

19 by the Treasury to be used as specified in section 2. 

20 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress shall have power to en21 force and implement this article by appropriate legislation. 

22 ‘‘SECTION 5. This article shall take effect in the first 

23 year beginning at least 90 days following ratification, ex24 cept that outlays shall not surpass the sum of the limit 

25 described in section 1 and the following portion of the 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 102 IH 

1 prior year’s outlays exceeding that limit (excepting emer2 gency outlays as provided for in section 2): six-sevenths 

3 in the first year, five-sixths in the second, four-fifths in 

4 the third, three-fourths in the fourth, two-thirds in the 

5 fifth, one-half in the sixth, and the limit shall bind in the 

6 seventh year and thereafter.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## EMBRY-RIDDLE

January 24,2014

Administrator Michael P. Huelia Federal AviationAdministration U.S. Department ofTranspoliation 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Administrator Huerta: College of Aviation Dean's Office
r**3S.6~22o-6S.f9** F:**3S6~226-6lN3**

forgive me for bringing an issue to your attention but I am deeply concerned that my institution's issue has not been addressed with any reasonable speed and as 

### a result htmdreds of our graduates arebeingprevented fromjoining the ranks ofairline pilots. In July of2013 the FAA released the newrules concerningrequirements for airline pilots entering Part 121 service. In general, the new rules required pilots to have gained at least 1,500 hours ofpilot time and have completed the ATP certificate. The rule also contained a provision whereby pilots who had graduated from FAA-approved collegiate programs could gain a restrictedATP 

### at 1,000 hours. Part ofthis provision required that only pilots trained for the Commercial Pilot Certificate and Instrument rating under Part 141 were eligible. We were surprised at this requirement because we assumed that the provision wmild also include those trained under Part 142 which is a higher standard. When itbecameclearthat l'art 142 was not included, we submitted an Exemption. This was onAugust 22, 2013. As oftoday, we have not received the exemption. We have been in contact with representatives from AFS 200 and AFS 800 who tell us that the exemption is being worked butmeanwhile about 2,000 ofour graduates who are otherwise eligible are being denied. This is at atime when a national pilot shortage is becoming acute in theregional airlines. Therelationship between Embry-Riddle and the FAA has been a strong one lor many years and we appreciate the excellent work that is done by the agency. We realize that you have 

### many issues to deal with and genuinely appreciate anything thatyou do to help the situation. Respectfully,

## /------,~,/; 

# c!_' \

_____,-**/~ ~---""**  - _../ Tim Brady,

# P:~J Dean,**Colleg~~viation**

600 S. Ciydc Morris Blvd, Dayton!!. Be,ach, Fl_ 3::!1 1-l·.NOl) :\()0-"862-2416
No. 12-6812 (12A390).

#### Ferguson *v.*Florida.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application and this petition.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 27 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2011 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the acceptance of a statue of Gerald R. Ford 

from the people of Michigan for placement in the United 

States Capitol. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF STATUE OF GERALD R. FORD 

4 FROM THE PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN FOR 

5 PLACEMENT IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The statue of Gerald R. Ford fur7 nished by the people of Michigan for placement in the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 27 RDS 

1 United States Capitol in accordance with section 1814 of 

2 the Revised Statutes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 

3 2131), is accepted in the name of the United States, and 

4 the thanks of the Congress are tendered to the people of 

5 Michigan for providing this commemoration of one of 

6 Michigan’s most eminent persons. 

7 (b) PRESENTATION CEREMONY.—The State of 

8 Michigan is authorized to use the Rotunda of the Capitol 

9 on May 3, 2011, for a presentation ceremony for the stat10 ue accepted under this section. The Architect of the Cap11 itol and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action 

12 as may be necessary with respect to physical preparations 

13 and security for the ceremony. 

14 (c) DISPLAY IN ROTUNDA.—The Architect of the 

15 Capitol shall provide for the display of the statue accepted 

16 under this section in the Rotunda of the Capitol, in ac17 cordance with the procedures described in section 311(e) 

18 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

19 U.S.C. 2132(e)). 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| Number of Options | Exercise Price     | Vesting Schedule                                                                           | Termination Date* |
|-------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| 364 options       | $12.0954           | May 9, 2004                                                                                | May 1, 2005       |
| 364 options       | $22.1411           | May 9, 2004                                                                                | May 1, 2006       |
| 364 options       | $17.6902           | May 9, 2004                                                                                | May 1, 2007       |
| 1,000 options     | $15.7813           | 75% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004                                                    | June 1, 2010      |
| 1,000 options     | $13.075            | 50% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004, and on the next anniversary thereof               | June 1, 2011      |
| 1,000 options     | $  4.275 | 25% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004, and on each of the next two anniversaries thereof | June 1, 2012      |
| 3,500 options     | $12.71             | 25% on June 1, 2004, and on each of the next three anniversaries thereof                   | June 1, 2013      |

| Number of Options | Exercise Price     | Vesting Schedule                                                                           | Termination Date* |
|-------------------|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| 1,000 options     | $15.7813           | 75% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004                                                    | June 1, 2010      |
| 1,000 options     | $13.075            | 50% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004, and on the next anniversary thereof               | June 1, 2011      |
| 1,000 options     | $  4.275 | 25% on May 9, 2004, 25% on June 1, 2004, and on each of the next two anniversaries thereof | June 1, 2012      |
| 3,500 options     | $12.71             | 25% on June 1, 2004, and on each of the next three anniversaries thereof                   | June 1, 2013      |

----
#### C.R. v. S.L.P.

1272 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/11/2017

FA 43 of 2016

(Greene)

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.3  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. Wolter Gary J. Wolter Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: May 8, 2007
#### K.T. v. P.H.

1806 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/20/2017

2010 FC 41013, (Lackawanna)

Affirmed
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern 1 District of Iowa, sitting by designation. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 2 Eastern District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2842

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Odel Clay, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 1999 Filed: January 21, 1999

___________ Bef ore BOWMAN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and VIETOR, Distric t 1 Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM. Odel Clay pleaded guilty to a federal crack cocaine charge, preserving for appeal his claim that the District Court erred by denying his motion to suppress. 2-2-

Havingcarefully considered Clay’s appeal, we conclude that the motion t o suppress was correctly denied. Accordingly, Clay’s conviction is affirmed. See 8 th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 10.12
 POSITIVEID CORPORATION
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD GRANTED UNDER THE
VERICHIP CORPORATION 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 [insert name of Grantee]
 Where the option award is to vest in tranches, use the following sentence as a replacement
for the one immediately prior: If to vest over more than, or less than,
three tranches, customize as necessary.
 IMPORTANT




---



##### 



TERMS AND CONDITIONS  NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD GRANTED UNDER  VERICHIP CORPORATION 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 1.
    
    Definitions(a)
    
    Committee
    
    The Committee (or, in certain cases, its designees) who
administers the Stock Option Plan(b)
    
    Company
    
    PositiveID Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a VeriChip Corporation(c)
    
    Grantee
    
    The recipient of an Option Award(d)
    
    Option
    
    The option granted by the Option Award(e)
    
    Option Award
    
    The Non-Qualified Stock Option Award to which the Terms
and Conditions are attached together with, except where
the context requires otherwise, these Terms and
Conditions(f)
    
    Stock Option Plan
    
    VeriChip Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended
  2.
    
    Evidence of Option Grant and Option not an Incentive Stock Option
  3.
    
    Exercise of Option
  4.
    
    Payment of Option Price
   1




---



##### 



5.
    
    Form of Notice of Exercise
  
 
 6.
    
    Stock Certificates
  7.
    
    Legends on Certificates
   2
       8.
    
    Termination of Employment; Nonassignability
 8.1
    
    Voluntary Termination or Termination for Cause.
     8.2
    
    Other Termination.
   3
       Non-Transferability of Rights; Designation of Beneficiaries
 Deemed Termination of Employment and Transfer
 9.
    
    Withholding
  10.
    
    Right to Exercise Acceleration
  11.
    
    Stock Option Plan Controls
   4
#### Williams v. State

106,148

07/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Other States Natural Gas Vented and Flared  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Other States Natural Gas Vented and Flared  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        | 5,109  | 5,883  | 6,176  | 6,137  | 7,435  | 7,909  | 1,778  | 1,576  | 7,564 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,012  | 2,473  | 2,135  | 2,467  | 2,399  | 2,342  | 13,372 | 13,786 | 14,704 | 15,863
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 16,785 | 18,549 | 0      | 0      | 0      | 13,957 | 0      | 0      | 7      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
057P16

#### Sound Rivers and North Carolina Coastal Federation v. N.C. Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., Intervenor

1. Intervenor’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP15-925)

2. Intervenor’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Beaufort County

1. Special Order

2. Special Order
<PAGE>
                                                           Exhibit 32(b)

                      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                      ________________________________


     I, Gregory A. Smith, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall & Ilsley
          Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
          (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C.
          78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Dated:    August 8, 2007


                              /s/ Gregory A. Smith
                              ______________________________

                              Gregory A. Smith
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.



MW1357885_1
#### Renee D. BELL, Appellant, v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOC./ LEADER MORTGAGE, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-4371

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Janet C. Thorpe, Judge.

AFFIRMED.