alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10949]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (98-057]


Proposed Information Collection

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of agency report forms under OMB review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of 
its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, 
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this 
opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information 
collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). The reports will be utilized by 
the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization as a method 
for determining if developmental assistance provided to small 
disadvantaged businesses by prime contractor's performance meets the 
standards established in NASA policy. The Agency's ability to manage 
the program effectively would be greatly diminished without receiving 
the described reports, which are part of the ongoing performance fee 
evaluation process.

DATES: All comments should be submitted on or before June 23, 1998.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Richard Kall, Code 
HK, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carmela Simonson, NASA Reports 
Officer, (202) 358-1223.
    Title: Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns and 
Related Contract Provisions NASA FAR Supplement Part 18-19, SF 295.
    OMB Number: 2700-0073.
    Type of review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: NASA requires reporting of small disadvantaged 
business subcontract awards in order to meet its Congressionally 
mandated goals.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Number of Respondents: 225.
    Responses Per Respondents: 2.
    Annual Responses: 450.
    Hours Per Request: 13.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,850.
    Frequency of Report: Biannually.
Eva L. Layne,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-10949 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### State v. Anderson

108,413

10/29/13

Denied

Unpublished
#### PENN-AIRE AVIATION v. ADAPT APPALACHIA

565 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

2012-01252

(Venango)

Affirmed/Reversed/Remanded
# t37p01p1
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                              
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History: Annual                                                        
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Michigan Natural Gas Exports (No Intransit Deliveries)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Michigan Natural Gas Exports (No Intransit Deliveries)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       | 9,113   | 3,257   | 17,900  | 38,361 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 17,284  | 14,751  | 67,763  | 44,413  | 49,470  | 26,948  | 50,363  | 56,447  | 39,683  | 36,998 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 70,980  | 161,588 | 171,515 | 259,597 | 368,947 | 337,818 | 317,291 | 455,216 | 531,333 | 673,318
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 721,075 | 876,267 | 872,620 | 684,510 | 554,675 | 486,675 | 457,780 | 596,815 | 496,830 | 566,895
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 485,750 | 547,143 | 597,496 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
228P16

#### State v. Derrick Dewayne Wallace

1. Def’s Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-783)

2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. State’s Motion for Response to PDR to be Deemed Timely Filed

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*

2. Denied

3. Dismissed as moot
No. 12-5850.

#### Price *v.*Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 6 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States waiving 

the application of the first article of amendment to the political speech 

of corporations and other business organizations with respect to the 

disbursement of funds in connection with public elections and granting 

Congress and the States the power to establish limits on contributions 

and expenditures in elections for public office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States waiving the application of the first article of 

amendment to the political speech of corporations and 

other business organizations with respect to the disbursement of funds in connection with public elections and 

granting Congress and the States the power to establish 

limits on contributions and expenditures in elections for 

public office. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the ConVerDate Mar 15 2010 22:28 Jan 06, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ6.IH HJ6

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 6 IH 

1 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

2 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

3 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

4 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

5 for ratification: 

6 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

7 ‘‘SECTION 1. The first article of amendment does not 

8 apply to the political speech of any corporation, partner9 ship, business trust, association, or other business organi10 zation with respect to the making of contributions, ex11 penditures, or other disbursements of funds in connection 

12 with public elections. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Congress shall have power to set limits 

14 on the amount of contributions that may be accepted by, 

15 and the amount of expenditures that may be made by, in 

16 support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for nomination 

17 for election to, or for election to, Federal office. 

18 ‘‘SECTION 3. A State shall have power to set limits 

19 on the amount of contributions that may be accepted by, 

20 and the amount of expenditures that may be made by, in 

21 support of, or in opposition to, a candidate for nomination 

22 for election to, or for election to, State or local office. 

23 ‘‘SECTION 4. Congress shall have power to implement 

24 and enforce this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Mercury GeneralCorporation: 

 

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet ofMercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

Weconducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of personsresponsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expressionof an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be inconformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. 

 

We havepreviously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidatedstatements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 11, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financialstatements. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

May 5, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1005 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1005

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 
             ambulance services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2011

Mr. Boustany (for himself and Mr. Neal) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 
             ambulance services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Ambulance Access 
Preservation Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. RETENTION OF ACCESS TO GROUND AMBULANCE SERVICES IN RURAL AND 
              URBAN AREAS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1834(l)(13)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(l)(13)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
        ``2012'' and inserting ``2018'';
            (2) in clause (i), by inserting ``, or 6 percent if such 
        service is furnished on or after January 1, 2012, and before 
        January 1, 2018'' after ``2012''; and
            (3) in clause (ii), by inserting ``, or 6 percent if such 
        service is furnished on or after January 1, 2012, and before 
        January 1, 2018'' after ``2012''.

SEC. 3. RETENTION OF ACCESS TO AMBULANCE SERVICES IN SUPER RURAL AREAS 
              UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1834(l)(12)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(l)(12)(A)) is amended by striking ``2012'' and inserting 
``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-12-00091-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MARISSA ANN MARTINEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Marissa Ann Martinez, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to 

dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having 
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

8th day of March, 2012.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33536]


Wabash Central Railroad Corporation--Operation Exemption--Wabash 
Central, L.L.C.

    Wabash Central Railroad Corporation, a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire operating 
rights over a line of railroad owned by Wabash Central, L.L.C., from 
Craigsville, IN (milepost 117.8), to Van Buren, IN (milepost 108.6), a 
distance of approximately 26.4 miles of rail line and incidental 
trackage rights.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after 
December 31, 1997.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33536, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Richard R. Wilson, Esq., 1126 Eighth Avenue, Suite 403, 
Altoona, PA 16602.

    Decided: January 7, 1998.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-1068 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### State v. Youngken

111,291

07/02/2015

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20638-20639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11018]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 042098F]


Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.


[[Page 20639]]


ACTION: Notice of receipt of application for a scientific research 
permit (1144).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Bruce D. Peery, Micheal J. 
Bresette, and Jonathan C. Gorham have applied in due form for a 
scientific research permit (1144) to take listed sea turtles.

DATES: Written comments or requests for a public hearing on this 
application must be received on or before May 27, 1998.
ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review by appointment in the following offices:
    Office of Protected Resources, F/PR3, NMFS, 1315 East-West Hwy., 
Room 13307, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Director, Southeast Region, NMFS, NOAA, 9721 Executive Center 
Drive, St. Petersburg, FL 33702-2432 (813-893-3141).
    Written comments, or requests for a public hearing on this 
application should be submitted to the Chief, Endangered Species 
Division, Office of Protected Resources.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bruce D. Peery, Micheal J. Bresette, and 
Jonathan C. Gorham request a scientific research permit under the 
authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 U.S.C. 1531-
1543) and NMFS regulations governing listed fish and wildlife permits 
(50 CFR parts 217-227).
    The applicants request a one-year scientific research permit to 
take listed sea turtles. Up to 100 green (Chelonia mydas) and 50 
loggerhead (Caretta caretta) turtles will be taken in large mesh tangle 
nets for the purposes of assessing the population densities and 
dynamics, and to attain growth rates of sea turtles that utilize the 
southern Indian River Lagoon System, Florida. Captured turtles will be 
weighed, photographed, measured, tagged, and released.
    Those individuals requesting a hearing should set out the specific 
reasons why a hearing on this particular application would be 
appropriate (see ADDRESSES). The holding of such hearing is at the 
discretion of the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA. All 
statements and opinions contained in this application summary are those 
of the applicant and do not necessarily reflect the views of NMFS.

    Dated: April 21, 1998.
Patricia A. Montanio,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 98-11018 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019284EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/18 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9514 — Bain Capital Investors/Kantar)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 284/07)

1.

On 16 August 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019284EN.01001801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Bain Capital Investors LLC (Bain Capital Investors, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Kantar Group (Kantar, United Kingdom), controlled by WPP plc (WPP, United Kingdom). |

Bain Capital Investors acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Kantar.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Bain Capital Investors: global private equity investment firm that invests in companies across many sectors, including information technology, healthcare, retail and consumer products, communication, financial services and manufacturing,

—   for Kantar: global data, research, consulting and analytics activities, including the provision of market research services, media measurement services and marketing and communication services.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019284EN.01001801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9514 — Bain Capital Investors/Kantar

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019284EN.01001801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019284EN.01001801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---