alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 24

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2011

 Mr. Neugebauer (for himself, Mr. Chaffetz, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. 
Marchant, Mr. Burgess, and Mr. Gohmert) introduced the following joint 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Any bill, resolution, or other legislative measure 
changing the internal revenue laws shall require for final adoption in 
each House the concurrence of two-thirds of the Members of that House 
voting and present, unless that bill, resolution, or other legislative 
measure is determined at the time of adoption, in a reasonable manner 
prescribed by law, not to increase the internal revenue by more than a 
de minimis amount. For the purposes of determining any increase in the 
internal revenue under this section, there shall be excluded any 
increase resulting from the lowering of an effective rate of any tax. 
On any vote for which the concurrence of two-thirds is required under 
this article, the yeas and nays of the Members of either House shall be 
entered on the Journal of that House.
    ``Section 2. The Congress may waive the requirements of this 
article when a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also 
waive this article when the United States is engaged in military 
conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat to national 
security and is so declared by a joint resolution, adopted by a 
majority of the whole number of each House, which becomes law. Any 
increase in the internal revenue enacted under such a waiver shall be 
effective for not longer than two years.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q. Items 1 through 22 are as of March 31, 2000. Items 23 through 38 are for
the three months ended March 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      401,883
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,607
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          61,650
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        24,602
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,742
<COMMON>                                        16,287
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      116,253
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             60,164
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 192,704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           148,609
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 139,229
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  491,742
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       84,543
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             5,566
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      66,570
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      72,136
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         12,407
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 781
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  13,188
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,078
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,110
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   10,110
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         5,316
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        2,155
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          29,759
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.62


</TABLE>
|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                   
|View History:                                                    
|                                                                 
|Delaware Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 
|                                                                 
|Delaware Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 14,805 | 16,287 | 21,075
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 25,325 | 20,059 | 17,634 | 15,172 | 16,025 | 15,257 | 16,398 | 16,014 | 18,216 | 17,402
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 7,983  | 19,760 | 28,737 | 32,154 | 31,004 | 33,126 | 31,457 | 29,860 | 30,783 | 33,865
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 34,896 | 32,826 | 31,367 | 32,651 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
No. 12-6502.

#### Lozano-Galvan *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Michael BRAGGS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-2923

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 11, 2017

L.T. NO.: 97-29056

Dismissed.
(1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ James L. Hambrick

James L. HambrickChief Executive Officer and PresidentAugust 8, 2008
  (1)
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The Lubrizol Corporation.
 /s/ Charles P. Cooley  

Charles P. CooleyChief Financial OfficerAugust 8, 2008
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Imports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Imports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 3.21   | 2.43   | 1.95   | 1.84   | 1.82  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1.94   | 1.83   | 1.85   | 2.03   | 1.87   | 1.49   | 1.97   | 2.17   | 1.97   | 2.24  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.95   | 4.43   | 3.15   | 5.17   | 5.81   | 8.12   | 6.88   | 6.87   | 8.70   | 4.19  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.52   | 4.24   | 2.88   | 3.83   | 5.30   | 2.99   | 2.24   | 2.60   | 2.69   | 2.55  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.07   | 3.78   | 6.33   | 3.32   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 1 6 5 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. D I O N I S I O A N I B A L S A U C E D O , J R

. , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 6 : 0 9

- C R

- 4 0

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * D i o n i s i o A n i b a l S a u c e d o , J r
. , a p p e a l s t h e s e n t e n c e i m p o s e d u p o n h i s g u i l t y - p l e a c o n v i c t i o n f o r a i d i n g a n d a b e t t i n g t h e p o s s e s s i o n o f a n u n r e g i s t e r e d f i r e a r m
. S e e 2 6 U

. S

. C

. § 5 8 6 1 ( d )

. T h e u n r e g i s t e r e d f i r e a r m a t i s s u e w a s a

s a w e d

- o f

f s h o t g u n
. S a u c e d o a r g u e s t h a t t h e s a w e d

- o f f s h o t g u n s h o u l d n o t h a v e b e e n d e e m e d a “ d e s t r u c t i v e d e v i c e ” u n d e r U

. S

. S

. G

. § 2 K 2

. 1 ( b ) ( 3 ) ( B ) a n d t h a t h i s

s e n t e n c e s h o u l d n o t h a v e b e e n e n h a n c e d o n t h a t b a s i s
. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10165 Document: 00511274787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010N o
. 1 0

- 1 0 1 6 5

A s S a u c e d o a c k n o w l e d g e s , h i s a r g u m e n t i s f o r e c l o s e d b y U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. H e n r y , 4 1 7 F

. 3 d 4 9 3 , 4 9 4 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 5 )

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t i s A F F I R M E D

. T h e G o v e r n m e n t ’ s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y a f

f i r m a n c e i s G R A N T E D , a n d i t s a l t e r n a t i v e m o t i o n f o r a n e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e i s D E N I E D

.

2 Case: 10-10165 Document: 00511274787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Glenn A. Kleinert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 7, 2004





/s/    Glenn A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President

and Chief Executive Officer
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 55 

Disapproving of the participation of the United States in the provision by 

the International Monetary Fund of a multibillion dollar funding package 

for the European Union, until the member states of the European Union 

comply with the economic requirements of membership in the European 

Union. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 25, 2011 

Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving of the participation of the United States in 

the provision by the International Monetary Fund of 

a multibillion dollar funding package for the European 

Union, until the member states of the European Union 

comply with the economic requirements of membership 

in the European Union. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That the Congress disapproves of the partici3 pation of the United States in the provision by the Inter4 national Monetary Fund of a multibillion dollar funding 

5 package to the European Union, until each member state 

6 of the European Union demonstrate compliance with the 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 55 IH 

1 economic requirements of membership in the European 

2 Union, including limiting the deficit of the member state 

3 to 3 percent of the gross domestic product of the member 

4 state and limiting the total public debt of the member 

5 state to 60 percent of the gross domestic product of the 

6 member state. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
No. 12-6180.

#### Rodriguez-Favela *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-1165

WELAI GRANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-02173-RDB)

Submitted: August 27, 2024 Decided: August 29, 2024

Before KING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Welai Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Alexa Erin Ackerman, Assistant County Attorney, 

BALTIMORE CITY SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, Baltimore, Maryland; Kara Kiminsky 

Lynch, Michael Patrick Redmond, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1165 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Welai Grant appeals the district court’s order granting the Baltimore City Police 

Department summary judgment on Grant’s retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII 

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Grant 

v. Balt. City Police Dep’t, No. 1:21-cv-02173-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 1, 2024). We deny 

Grant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1165 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 37 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 34
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2011

                     Received; read the first time

                             April 13, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
   Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband 
                          industry practices.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to the 
matter of preserving the open Internet and broadband industry practices 
(Report and Order FCC 10-201, adopted by the Commission on December 21, 
2010), and such rule shall have no force or effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                        Calendar No. 34

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

     Disapproving the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
   Commission with respect to regulating the Internet and broadband 
                          industry practices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 13, 2011

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### State v. Kirkhart

111,482

07/09/2015

Denied

Unpublished