alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                              
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Nevada Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Nevada Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        | 53     | 30     | 21     | 16     | 13     | 11     | 9      | 9      | 8     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7      | 7      | 6      | 6      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 5      | 4      | 4     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 4      | 3      | 3      | 3      | 5     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 4      | 4      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 60 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 60

 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
 relating to ``Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and 
  Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial 
                   Solid Waste Incineration Units''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2011

    Mr. Carter introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
 relating to ``Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and 
  Emission Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial 
                   Solid Waste Incineration Units''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources and Emission 
Guidelines for Existing Sources: Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste 
Incineration Units'' (published at 76 Federal Register 15704 (March 21, 
2011)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Missouri Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Missouri Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4.75   | 4.47   | 4.40  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.78   | 7.49   | 6.01   | 7.93   | 8.80   | 10.99  | 11.83  | 10.84  | 11.32  | 9.55  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.70   | 8.54   | 7.85   | 8.19   | 8.00   | 7.58   | 6.29   | 6.64   | 6.51   | 6.20  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.77   | 6.62   | 9.81   | 9.26   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 12-6312.

#### Wellington *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2020372EN.01001101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 372/11 |

---

OPINION OF THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 28 October 2020

on a Council recommendation on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(CON/2020/26)

(2020/C 372/03)

Introduction and legal basis

On 14 October 2020 the European Central Bank (ECB) received a request from the President of the European Council for an opinion on Council Recommendation of 9 October 2020 on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank [(1)](#ntr1-C_2020372EN.01001101-E0001).

The competence of the ECB’s Governing Council to deliver an opinion is based on Article 283(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

General observations

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | The Council’s recommendation, which was submitted to the European Council and on which the European Parliament and the ECB’s Governing Council are being consulted, recommends that Frank ELDERSON be appointed as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board for a term of office of eight years with effect from 15 December 2020. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | The ECB’s Governing Council is of the opinion that the proposed candidate is a person of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters as required by Article 283(2) of the Treaty. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 3. | The ECB’s Governing Council has no objection to the Council’s recommendation to appoint Frank Elderson as a member of the ECB’s Executive Board. |

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 28 October 2020.

The President of the ECB

Christine LAGARDE

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2020372EN.01001101-E0001)  [OJ C 338, 12.10.2020, p. 2](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2020_338_R_TOC).

---
IL EPA comments on draft NPDES Permit

Lowry, Leslie 

to: 

Jack Faulk 

01/25/2010 05:55 PM 

Cc: 

"Keller, Al", "LeCrone, Darin" 

Show Details 

Jack, 

 

Here are some additional comments on the draft NPDES Pesticide Permit. 

 

1.1.1 Leaving “near” out of the permit opens EPA and the states up to many questions and possible 

permit appeals because the court decision included “near waters” of the U.S. The Agency is also 

concerned about 3rd party lawsuits on this issue.

 

1.1.1 Need to include another use category for terrestrial agriculture application as it is near or in 

waters of the U.S. 

 

1.2.2 Bullet 4. You include farms or ranches, what is the rational behind excluding these from 

submitting an NOI. During the meeting it was mentioned that your intent was to exclude these facilities 

even though they were included in this section. 

 

1.2.5.1 What is the rational for posting terminations? There does not appear to be any rational for 

posting the terminations and allowing for any public notice requirement. This seems to be a very poor 

use of resources, especially since most states are already very resource limited. 

 

1.2.5.2 If a new operator takes over responsibility of the pest control activities why do they need to 

terminate the old permit? Why can’t the permit just be transferred to the new operator and have the new 

operator submit a NOI? This process would be similar to minor modifications for individual permits. 

There would be less of an administrative burden alleviating one of the steps. 

 

5.0 What is the justification for not posting the PDMPs? The Illinois general stormwater permit 

requires that the SWPPP be posted and this could be an issue with environmental groups. 

 

6.3.2 We recommend only a 5 day adverse incident written report which is similar to other Illinois 

permits. 

 

6.4 We recommend only 5 days here as well. 

 

Appendix F On the NOI form you have the applicant providing a map and a description of the 

location of pesticide application, but you don’t have them listing all of the water bodies in that area. 

That is putting the burden on the regulating agency of identify the water bodies. The water bodies need 

to be identified because the regulating agency will have to ensure that none of the streams are waters or 

tier 3 waters. Therefore the requirement to identify all the water bodies in the application site should fall 

on the applicant. 

 

Appendix F The NOI should also include a section for the applicant to check whether any of the 

affected water bodies are tier 3 waters or water bodies that have an impairment. Again putting the 

burden on the applicant instead of the regulating agency.

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web1914.htm 5/12/2010
 

Leslie Lowry 

Environmental Engineer 

Industrial Unit, IEPA 

1021 North Grand Ave. East 

Springfield, IL 62794 

(217) 782-4209 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web1914.htm 5/12/2010
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Executive Compensation and Equity Awards 
 Note: The following summary of
compensation arrangements does not include all previously-reported compensation arrangements or awards granted under previously-disclosed incentive plans. Disclosures with respect to compensation for Named Executive Officers for the 2011 fiscal year
will be included in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and disclosures with respect to compensation for Named Executive Officers for the 2012 fiscal year will be included in the
Company’s definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. 
 At a meeting of
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DigitalGlobe, Inc. (the “Company”) held on March 6, 2012, the Compensation Committee (a) determined and approved the 2012 base salaries and 2011 cash bonus awards for
the Company’s “named executive officers” (as defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission) under the Company’s 2011 Executive Success Sharing Plan,
(b) determined and approved the 2012 target bonus percentage for each of the named executive officers under the Company’s Executive Success Sharing Plan and (c) granted long-term incentives to the named executive officers under the
2011 Executive Success Sharing Plan, delivered 70% in the form of stock options and 30% in the form of restricted shares of our stock pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan, as set forth in the table below. Dollar values for
the 2012 long-term incentive awards are based upon the valuation of the options and restricted stock at the time of grant. The 2011 cash bonus award, 2012 target bonus award and long-term incentive grants for the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer were reviewed and approved by the full Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting held on March 7, 2012. 
  

				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,				September 30,	
	 Name and Title
	    	2011
Bonus
Award	 	    	2012
Base
Salary	 	    	2012
Target
Bonus
(%)	 	 	2012 LTI
Grant ($)	 
	 Jeffrey R. Tarr
	    				    				    				 			
	 President and Chief Executive

Officer
	    	$	347,100	  	    	$	575,000	  	    	 	100	% 	 	$	1,438,000	  
	 Yancey L. Spruill
	    				    				    				 			
	 Executive Vice President, Chief

Financial Officer and Treasurer
	    	$	167,100	  	    	$	329,600	  	    	 	60	% 	 	$	400,000	  
	 H. John Oechsle
	    				    				    				 			
	 Executive Vice President, Strategy &

Product
	    	$	148,800	  	    	$	290,000	  	    	 	60	% 	 	$	250,000	  
	 A. Rafay Khan
	    				    				    				 			
	 Senior Vice President, Commercial
	    	$	119,700	  	    	$	285,000	  	    	 	50	% 	 	$	345,000	  
	 J. Alison Alfers
	    				    				    				 			
	 Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary
	    	$	128,400	  	    	$	290,000	  	    	 	50	% 	 	$	175,000
#### Ellen ROSALER, Appellant, v. Joseph H. ROSALER, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1475

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; David E. French, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2014DR003949 FY.

*Affirmed.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State,

v.

JORGE ARTURO ESPINOZA,

 

 Appellee.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-16-00087-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 2

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150C10006)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until 

February 6, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Joshua C. Spencer, the Appellee’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before February 6, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3

rd day of February, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Kansas Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Kansas Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.53   | 2.14   | 2.36  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.18   | 3.60   | 3.11   | 5.37   | 5.50   | 7.78   | 6.32   | 6.31   | 8.11   | 4.13  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.05   | 4.79   | 3.28   | 4.57   | 5.65   | 3.95   | 3.48   | 3.85   | 3.33   | 2.83  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.62   | 9.85   | 7.05   | 3.06   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 469 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 469

 Recognizing the 60th Anniversary of the Fulbright Program in Thailand.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2010

 Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Webb, and Mr. Bond) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

                              May 25, 2010

                Reported by Mr. Kerry, without amendment

                           September 28, 2010

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 60th Anniversary of the Fulbright Program in Thailand.

Whereas 2008 was the 175th anniversary of relations between the Kingdom of 
        Thailand and the United States;
Whereas the Fulbright Program is sponsored by the Bureau of Educational and 
        Cultural Affairs of the Department of State;
Whereas the Fulbright Program currently operates in over 150 countries;
Whereas the Thailand-United States Educational Foundation (TUSEF) was 
        established by a formal agreement in 1950;
Whereas 2010 is the 60th anniversary of the Fulbright Program partnership with 
        the Kingdom of Thailand;
Whereas approximately 1,600 Fulbright students and scholars from Thailand have 
        studied, conducted research, or lectured in the United States;
Whereas 800 Fulbright grantees from the United States conducted research or gave 
        lectures in Thailand from 1951 through 2008;
Whereas active consideration is being given to increasing the emphasis of the 
        Fulbright Program in southern Thailand, including through the Fulbright 
        English Teaching Assistantship Program; and
Whereas the United States Government supports additional programs in Thailand in 
        the areas of education, democracy promotion, good governance, and public 
        diplomacy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate encourages the President to maintain and 
expand interaction with the Kingdom of Thailand in ways which 
facilitate close coordination and partnership in the areas of education 
and cultural exchange throughout all of Thailand, including the 
southern provinces.
```
#### COM. v. FRANK, R.

1662 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

CP-21-CR-0002091-2009, CP-21-CR-0002094-2009 (Cumberland)

Affirmed
# C_2019347EN.01000901.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9294 — BMS/Celgene)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 347/09)

On 29 July 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9294. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9294. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---