alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)****(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)**I, Steve Collins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this yearly report on Form 10-KSB of First United Ethanol, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of First United Ethanol, LLC as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. First United Ethanol, LLC’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for First United Ethanol, LLC and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to First United Ethanol, LLC including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of First United Ethanol, LLC’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in First United Ethanol, LLC’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during First United Ethanol, LLC’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, First United Ethanol, LLC’s internal control over financialreporting.5. First United Ethanol, LLC’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to First United Ethanol, LLC’sauditors and the audit committee of First United Ethanol, LLC’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect First United Ethanol, LLC’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in First United Ethanol, LLC’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.        Date:      December 22, 2006 /s/ Steve Collins   Steve Collins, Treasurer   *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|North Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|North Dakota Natural Gas Industrial Consumption  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 20,580 | 20,606 | 17,561
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 14,423 | 17,759 | 19,101 | 14,449 | 16,409 | 11,841 | 14,302 | 18,117 | 21,255 | 15,680
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 23,762 | 28,303 | 26,680 | 27,812 | 27,762 | 31,660 | 31,232 | 32,127 | 35,072 | 36,093
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 38,496 | 38,461 | 39,492 | 42,103 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Legette

106,546

08/19/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 70 

To grant the consent of Congress to an amendment to the compact between 

the States of Missouri and Illinois providing that bonds issued by the 

Bi-State Development Agency may mature in not to exceed 40 years. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2011 

Mr. CLAY (for himself, Mr. CARNAHAN, Mr. AKIN, and Mr. COSTELLO) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

To grant the consent of Congress to an amendment to the 

compact between the States of Missouri and Illinois providing that bonds issued by the Bi-State Development 

Agency may mature in not to exceed 40 years. 

Whereas to grant the consent of Congress to an amendment 

to the compact between the States of Missouri and Illinois providing that bonds issued by the Bi-State Development Agency may mature in not to exceed 40 years; 

Whereas the Congress in consenting to the compact between 

Missouri and Illinois creating the Bi-State Development 

Agency and the Bi-State Metropolitan District provided 

that no power shall be exercised by the Bi-State Agency 

until such power has been conferred upon the Bi-State 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 70 IH 

Agency by the legislatures of the States to the compact 

and approved by an Act of Congress; 

Whereas such States previously enacted legislation providing 

that the Bi-State Agency had the power to issue notes, 

bonds, or other instruments in writing provided they shall 

mature in not to exceed 30 years, and Congress consented to such power; and 

Whereas such States have now enacted legislation amending 

this power: Now therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The consent of Congress is given 

5 to the amendment of the powers conferred on the Bi-State 

6 Development Agency by Senate Bill 758, Laws of Missouri 

7 2010 and Public Act 96–1520 (Senate Bill 3342), Laws 

8 of Illinois 2010. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment to the pow10 ers conferred by the Acts consented to in subsection (a) 

11 shall take effect on December 17, 2010. 

12 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF ACT OF AUGUST 31, 1950. 

13 The provisions of the Act of August 31, 1950 (64 

14 Stat. 568) shall apply to the amendment approved under 

15 this joint resolution to the same extent as if such amend16 ment was conferred under the provisions of the compact 

17 consented to in such Act. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 70 IH 

1 SEC. 3. RIGHT TO ALTER, AMEND, OR REPEAL. 

2 The right to alter, amend, or repeal this joint resolu3 tion is expressly reserved. 

4 SEC. 4. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS. 

5 The right is reserved to Congress to require the dis6 closure and furnishings of such information or data by the 

7 Bi-State Development Agency as is deemed appropriate by 

8 Congress. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Slip Op. 09-150 

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

 

Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge 

Consol. Court No. 08-00111 

 

JUDGMENT 

The United States Department of Commerce has filed its Final Results of 

Redetermination (Dec. 10, 2009) (“Remand Results”) pursuant to Catfish Farmers of 

Am. v. United States, 33 CIT ___, Slip. Op. 09-96 (Sept. 14, 2009) (“Catfish Farmers”). 

No party contests the Remand Results, and therefore, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained; and it is further 

ORDERED that the subject entries enjoined in this action, see Catfish Farmers, 

Consol. Court No. 08-00111 (USCIT Apr. 16, 2008) (order granting consent motion for 

preliminary injunction), must be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision, 

including all appeals, as provided for in Section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(e) (2006). 

 

 /s/ Leo M. Gordon 

 Judge Leo M. Gordon 

Dated: December 23, 2009 

 New York, New York 

CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES, 

 Defendant.
#### State v. Sharp

110,845

06/29/2015

Granted

Unpublished
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 23 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to honor 

the late Frank W. Buckles, the last United States veteran of the First 

World War, as a tribute to and in recognition of all United States 

military members who served in the First World War. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2011 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. HANNA, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. CLEAVER, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. OLSON, Mr. MILLER of Florida, 

Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. MCHENRY, and Mr. POE of Texas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a 

ceremony to honor the late Frank W. Buckles, the last 

United States veteran of the First World War, as a 

tribute to and in recognition of all United States military 

members who served in the First World War. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 23 IH 

1 SECTION 1. USE OF ROTUNDA TO HONOR FRANK W. BUCK2 LES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The rotunda of the Capitol is au4 thorized to be used for a ceremony to honor the late Mr. 

5 Frank Woodruff Buckles, the last United States veteran 

6 of the First World War, as a tribute to and in recognition 

7 of all United States military members who served in the 

8 First World War. 

9 (b) TIMING; IMPLEMENTATION.—The ceremony 

10 under subsection (a) shall be held at a time to be deter11 mined jointly by the majority leader of the Senate, the 

12 minority leader of the Senate, the Speaker of the House 

13 of Representatives, and the minority leader of the House 

14 of Representatives, in consultation with the Architect of 

15 the Capitol. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 

16 be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 

17 Architect of the Capitol may prescribe. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
#### COM. v. HERB, B.

18 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/28/2017

CP-22-CR-0003986-2011 (Dauphin)

Affirmed
#### Kevin D. BRANSTETTER, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. The BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, et al., Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D16-4746

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 18, 2017

L.T. No.: 14-CA-51494

Dismissed.
239P16

#### State v. Chad Braxton Bumpers

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-1)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supei'sedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 06/24/2016

2.

3.
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Michael Caridi, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Perf-Go Green Holdings,
Inc.;




2. Based upon my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based upon my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and
have:




(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Intentionally
omitted;




(c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(d) Disclosed in
this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
and  report financial data; and




(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






Dated:
      July 14, 2009
            
            /s/ Michael CaridiActing
      Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                   
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History: Annual                                                             
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Federal Offshore California Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 51,592 | 48,825 | 50,833 | 41,886 | 48,879 | 42,018 | 43,904 | 45,844
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 45,831 | 42,223 | 43,896 | 40,917 | 39,884 | 36,204 | 29,624 | 35,121 | 29,506 | 31,706
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 30,162 | 26,779 | 27,262 | 27,454 | 14,515 | 14,748 | 4,499  | 3,950  | 3,427  | 2,876 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,752  | 2,784  |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Certification**

I, Andrew Wong, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board of Monza Ventures Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of the Company.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theCompany and have:

    a.    designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byother within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;

    b.    (paragraph omitted pursuantto SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;)

    c.    evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and

    d.    disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the Company's internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sinternal control over financial reporting ; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of theCompany's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.    all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

    b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

/s/ "Andrew Wong"

Andrew Wong

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board

(Principal Executive Officer)

February 21, 2007
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1271

EMMANUEL EDOKOBI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JUDGE PAUL W. GRIMM , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv
- 00905

- GJH )

Submitted : February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021

Before MOTZ , KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Emmanuel Edokobi , Appellant Pro Se. Derek Scott Hammond, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Alan Robert Burch, Associate General Counsel , OFFICE OF T HE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Emmanuel Edokobi appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for recusal and granting Defendant’s motion t o dismiss his civil action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Edokobi v. Grimm , No. 8:19

- cv
- 00905

- GJH (D. Md. Mar. 4, 2020). We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED