alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 28, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00212

- CR

Sean Leroy HAYS

, Ap pellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- 0232

- CR

- A Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On December 30, 2019, this order granted appellant’s pro se motion to access the appellate record and ordered the district clerk to send a full and complete duplicate copy of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record to appellant. On January 17, 2020, t he district clerk filed written notice in this court that the record was mailed to appellant.

On January 21, 2020, this court received a letter from appellant dated January 15, 20 20, requesting an extension of time to file a pro se brief because appellan t had not yet received the appellate record. Because the appellate record has now been mailed to appellant, i t is ORDERED that appellant’s pro se brief, should he choose to file one, is due no later than thirty (30) days

from the date of this order. I t is further ORDERED that i f the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty (30) days after the date the appellant’s pro se

brief is filed in this court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Ortega-Cadelan v. State

110,590

07/22/2015

Denied. ..

Unpublished
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           | 2,385     | 11,099    | 5,421     | 22,065    | 55,447   
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 33,018    | 75,239    | 163,750   | 84,195    | 99,057    | 88,836    | 85,745    | 94,818    | 93,023    | 99,533   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 177,688   | 307,060   | 452,391   | 613,848   | 791,671   | 663,234   | 663,020   | 773,969   | 924,046   | 1,039,002
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,071,997 | 1,435,649 | 1,590,531 | 1,569,375 | 1,497,771 | 1,754,918 | 2,148,399 | 2,446,091 | 2,524,501 | 2,837,848
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,894,329 | 3,091,580 | 3,038,257 | 3,267,651 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
**Exhibit32.2:   Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Certificationof Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

*I,Gordon A. Milne, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer) of The Ryland Group, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Reporton Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company (the “Report”),that:*

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The informationcontained and incorporated by reference in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
|   | /s/ Gordon A. Milne    |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Gordon A. Milne  |   |
|   | Date: November 7, 2006 |   |

 

----
#### New York Post Corporation, Plaintiff, *v.*Norman M. Newman, Defendant.

County Court, Nassau County,

December 30, 1971.

*Leonard Clark*for defendant. *Walter Higgins*for plaintiff.

Paul Kelly, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for an order pursuant to CPLB 5240 vacating the restraining provisions contained in the subpoena duces tecum issued from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, to the Chemical Bank, dated October 26, 1971 and releasing from said restraining provision the joint checking account of Norman Martin Newman and Ann Mary Newman.

*301The defendant contends the funds remaining in this checking account represent the balance of his earnings and are necessary to meet current family expenses. The defendant is presently unemployed.

The plaintiff argues that these funds are all that remain of the $286.40 cash-in receipts collected by the defendant while acting in a fiduciary capacity for the New York Post Corporation. The source of said funds having been a misappropriation, they are not income.

The court has examined the papers in great detail. The defendant’s bank statements indicate there has been substantial activity since the deposit of the funds in issue. The court cannot accept the rationale that the funds presently in the account are the remains of the cash-in receipts.

The language of *Power*v. *Loonam*(49 Misc 2d 127), decided by Justice Hogan of the New York Supreme Court,. County of Nassau, is controlling herein. Therefore, the motion is granted to the extent that the order hereunder shall vacate the restraining notice and further direct that 10% of the funds shall be turned over to the attorney for the judgment creditor to be applied in reducing the unpaid balance.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Sherwood, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Sherwood, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | NA      | NA     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,249  | 494,795 | 453,093 | 435,199 | 458,675 | 491,481 | 511,488 | 465,939 | 490,024 | 479,741
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 476,855 | 448,967 | 433,713 | 432,497 | 433,227 | 419,749 | 493,099 | 489,738 | 486,921 | 460,972
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 383,479 | 443,543 | 486,065 | 462,145 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Exhibit 10.6]



                       Consent of Director


June 24, 2003



Gentlemen:

I hereby consent to the use of my name in the registration of the
securities of Link Plus Corp. (Tax ID. # 52-1018174).

Sincerely,



/s/Emmett Paige, Jr.
122 Cross Foxes Drive
Fort Washington, MD  20744
|       1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|       2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |   |                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |   |                                                                 |
|       May 2, 2011 |   | /s/    Dale G. Barnhart                          |
|                                            |   | Dale G. BarnhartPresident and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                                            |   |                                                                 |
|       May 2, 2011 |   | /s/    Erika G. Turner                           |
|                                            |   | Erika G. TurnerVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

----
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Louisiana Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Louisiana Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.87   | 2.31   | 2.54  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.03   | 5.04   | 3.69   | 5.53   | 6.58   | 9.11   | 7.42   | 7.08   | 9.32   | 4.31  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.68   | 4.25   | 2.96   | 3.86   | 5.05   | 3.33   | 3.11   | 3.64   | 3.52   | 3.37  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.58   | 4.04   | 6.79   | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11060]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-70-001]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

April 21, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 15, 1998, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing certain information concerning the 
impact of its revised cashout mechanism.
    Southern states that its filing is in compliance with the 
Commission's December 30, 1997 order directing Southern to file 
information explaining the cashout imbalances and system management 
costs incurred for storage gas cost gains or losses in order to further 
evaluate the effectiveness of the revised cashout mechanism.
    Southern states that copies of the filing will be served upon all 
parties designated on the official service list compiled by the 
Secretary in these proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before April 28, 1998. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11060 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23215-23216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11228]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05-98-026]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Wicomico River (North Prong)

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Main Street drawbridge across the Wicomico River, mile 22.4, in 
Salisbury, Maryland. Beginning April 21, 1998, through May 19, 1998, 
this deviation requires three-hours advance notice for drawbridge 
openings from 9 a.m. through 3 p.m. on weekdays and from 7 p.m. on 
Fridays through 6 a.m. on Mondays. This deviation is necessary to allow 
the contractor to paint the bridge.

DATES: This deviation is effective from April 21, 1998 through May 19, 
1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann B. Deaton, Bridge Administrator, Fifth Coast Guard District, at 
(757) 398-6222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Textar Painting Corporation, a contractor 
for the Maryland Department of Transportation, requested the Coast 
Guard to approve a temporary deviation from the normal operation of the 
bridge in order to accommodate painting the structure. To paint the 
bridge, a barge must be used which will block the waterway. Three-hours 
advance notice will be required to move the barge out of the channel 
and open the bridge during the requested time periods.
    This deviation will not significantly disrupt vessel traffic, since 
very little exists during this time of the year. The regulations at 33 
CFR 117.579 require the draw to open on signal except from 7 a.m. to 9 
a.m., from 12 noon to 1 p.m.,

[[Page 23216]]

and from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. During these time periods the draw opens only 
for tugs with tows if at least three-hours advance notice is given, and 
the reason for passage through the bridge during a closure period is 
due to delay caused by inclement weather or other emergency or 
unforeseen circumstances.
    From April 21, 1998, through May 19, 1998, this deviation requires 
three-hours advance notice for openings of the Wicomico River Main 
Street Bridge from 9 a.m. through 3 p.m. on weekdays and from 7 p.m. on 
Fridays through 6 a.m. on Mondays.

    Dated: April 17, 1998.
J. Carmichael,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Fifth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 98-11228 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-M
#### Bernard S. NELSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-2348

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Portal, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Portal, ND Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 6,110  | 7,672  | 9,268  | 3,416 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 469    | 772    | 553    | 255    | 1,562  | 386    | 2,565  | 34     | 21     | 271   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9      | 10     | 8      | 12     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 130    | 149    | 14    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 12     | 15     | 13     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024