alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                                  
|                                                                               
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               
|                                                                               
|Grand Island, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |        |        | 42,832 | 42,302 | 44,981 | 33,140
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 49,012 | 95,639 | 110,417 | 76,421 | 66,612 | 92,474 | 80,907 | 88,886 | 61,641 | 81,898
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 63,548 | 47,616 | 23,000  | 5,758  | 1,413  | 4,940  | 1,760  | 2,676  | 5,660  | 10,528
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 24,975 | 26,569 | 25,467  | 22,100 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019217EN.01000102.xml

| 28.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9373 — PAI Partners/Areas Worldwide)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 217/02)

On 19 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9373. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9373. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-140-000]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

April 22, 1998.
    In the Commission's order issued on March 25, 1998, the Commission 
directed that a technical conference be held to address issues raised 
by the filing.
    Take notice that the technical conference will be held on Tuesday, 
Mary 5, 1998, at 10:00 a.m., in a room to be designated at the offices 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested parties and staff are permitted to attend.
David P. Boergers,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11173 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### AMERICAN TREE SERVICE, Clarendon National Insurance Company/Enstar, Petitioners, v. Eric BUNDSHUH, Respondent.

CASE NO. 1D17-1197

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed October 16, 2017.

Robert B. Griffis of Jones, Hurley *&*Hand, P.A., Orlando, for Petitioners.

Michael J. Winer of Law Office of Michael J. Winer, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding of original jurisdiction, Petitioners are the Employer/Carrier in a workers’ compensation case, and Respondent is the injured worker. Petitioners seek to prohibit any further action stemming from a show cause order entered against them by a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC).

The petition is heréby dismissed as moot because no justiciable controversy remains. Even though Petitioners have responded to the JCC’s show cause order, the JCC who entered that show cause order has been recused, and the successor JCC has entered an order that he will not, at this time, act on or enforce the previous JCC’s order to show cause. Prohibition is not appropriate at this time, as there is no *485impending injury that cannot be reviewed by other means.

DISMISSED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ„ CONCUR.
#### State v. Neighbors

105,588

04/19/13

Granted. ...

Unpublished
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019217EN.01002101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/21 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9400 — Apollo Management/Ares/JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 217/10)

1.

On 20 June 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019217EN.01002101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, USA), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Ares Management Corporation (‘Ares’, USA). |

Apollo and Ares acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of a newly created full-function joint venture (‘JV’).

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for Apollo: investment in companies and debt issued by companies involved in various businesses throughout the world,

—   for Ares: investment in real estate and in companies and debt issued by companies involved in various businesses.

The JV will be active in the identification, acquisition and development of oil and natural gas properties in the United States of America.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019217EN.01002101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9400 — Apollo Management/Ares/JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019217EN.01002101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019217EN.01002101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
# C_2019151EN.01001401.xml

| 3.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9238 — INEOS/Ashland Global (Composites Business and Butanediol Manufacturing Facility))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 151/06)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | INEOS Enterprises Holdings Limited (‘INEOS’, Switzerland), |
| --- | --- |

—

INEOS Enterprises Holdings Limited (‘INEOS’, Switzerland),

| — | Global composites business and manufacturing facility in Marl (Germany) of Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (‘Ashland’, US) (‘the Target’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Global composites business and manufacturing facility in Marl (Germany) of Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (‘Ashland’, US) (‘the Target’).

INEOS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of parts of Ashland.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and assets.

2.

| — | for INEOS, the manufacture and sale of petrochemicals, specialty chemicals and oil products, globally, |
| --- | --- |

—

for INEOS, the manufacture and sale of petrochemicals, specialty chemicals and oil products, globally,

| — | for the Target, the manufacture and sale of specialty chemicals used in the production of composite resins such as vinyl ester resins, gel coats and unsaturated polyester resins, as well as the manufacture (in Marl) and sale of butanediol, tetrahydrofuran and other specialty chemicals used in the production of engineering plastics, thermoplastic elastomers and specialty solvent, globally. |
| --- | --- |

—

for the Target, the manufacture and sale of specialty chemicals used in the production of composite resins such as vinyl ester resins, gel coats and unsaturated polyester resins, as well as the manufacture (in Marl) and sale of butanediol, tetrahydrofuran and other specialty chemicals used in the production of engineering plastics, thermoplastic elastomers and specialty solvent, globally.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9238 — INEOS/Ashland Global (Composites Business and Butanediol Manufacturing Facility)

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. SA98-24-001]


Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation; Notice of Amendment of Petition for 
Adjustment

April 24, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 20, 1998, Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation 
(Cabot) amended its March 9, 1998 petition for adjustment under section 
502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) [15 U.S.C. 
Sec. 3142(c) (1982)], by filing a copy of Cabot's Escrow Agreement with 
the Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. (Chase), for incorporation into the 
record in that proceeding. Cabot's April 20 amendment is on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    In its March 9 petition, Cabot requested an extension of the 
Commission's March 9, 1998 refund deadline for first sellers to make 
Kansas ad valorem tax refunds to their respective pipeline purchasers, 
otherwise required by the Commission's September 10, 1997 order in 
Docket No. RP97-369-000 et al.\1\ Cabot's March 9 petition also 
indicated that Cabot intended to place refund amounts claimed by 
Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc., formerly: Williams Natural Gas 
Company, (Williams) and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle) 
into an escrow account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997); order denying reh'g issued 
January 28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 61,058 (1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Cabot's April 20 amendment states that Cabot placed $1,187,513 into 
its escrow account with Chase on April 9, 1998 ($492,285 of principal 
and $695,228 in interest), under the aforementioned Escrow Agreement.
    Any person desiring to answer Cabot's April 20 amendment should 
file such answer with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, on or before 15 days after the 
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register, in 
accordance with the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.213, 385.215, 385.1101, and 385.1106).
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11463 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 47 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 47

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 2, 2011

    Mr. Denham (for himself and Ms. Norton) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the District of Columbia 
              Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR DC SPECIAL 
              OLYMPICS LAW ENFORCEMENT TORCH RUN.

    On June 3, 2011, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the 
Senate may jointly designate, the 26th Annual District of Columbia 
Special Olympics Law Enforcement Torch Run (in this resolution referred 
to as the ``event'') may be run through the Capitol Grounds as part of 
the journey of the Special Olympics torch to the District of Columbia 
Special Olympics summer games.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITY OF CAPITOL POLICE BOARD.

    The Capitol Police Board shall take such actions as may be 
necessary to carry out the event.

SEC. 3. CONDITIONS RELATING TO PHYSICAL PREPARATIONS.

    The Architect of the Capitol may prescribe conditions for physical 
preparations for the event.

SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 
Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations on 
the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable to the 
Capitol Grounds, in connection with the event.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10935]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Joint Special Committee 182; Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards (MOPS) for an Avionics Computer Resource

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee (SC)-182 meeting to be held May 12-14, 1998, starting 
at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at the Garden Beach Hotel--La 
Pinede, 15/17 BD Baudonin--BP 89, 06162 Juan Les Pins, Cedex, France 
(phone 33 4 92 93 57 57, fax 33 4 92 93 57 56).
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (2) 
Review and Approval of the Agenda; (3) Review of Meeting Reports: a. 
Joint RTCA SC-182/EUROCAE Working Group-48 Meeting (2/4-6/98); b. 
Meeting with Members of Certification Authorities Software Team (2/18/
98); (4) Comments on Draft MOPS; (5) Comments on Defining a Framework 
for an Avionics Computing Resource; (6) Working Group Sessions; (7) 
Working Group Reports; (8) Other Business (8) Date and Place of Next 
Meetings (09/9-11/98, EUROCAE, Paris, France; 12/09-11/98, RTCA, 
Washington, DC.)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 17, 1998.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 98-10935 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED MOURAD BALZOURT, Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D 16

- 2929 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ________________________________/ Opinion filed February 24, 20 17 Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness of Appellate Counsel, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Mourad Balzourt, Jasper, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Respondent.

EVANDER, J. Mourad Balzourt was convicted of second-degree murder and abuse of a corpse. He was sentenced to life in prison on the murder conviction and to five years on the abuse of a corpse co nviction. His convictions were per curiam affirmed by this court. Balzourt v. State , 189 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016). Subsequently, Balzourt filed a petition and supplemental petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d), alleging ineffective2

assistance of appellate counsel. He argues, inter alia , that appellate counsel should have raised as an issue the trial court’s failure to conduct an adequate Faretta 1 inquiry when Balzourt requested to represent him self at the sentencing hearing. We find merit to this argument. Balzourt was represented by counsel at trial. At the onset of the sentencing hearing, Balzourt advised the trial court of his belief that his trial counsel had a “conflict of interest” and made an unequivocal request to represent himself. The trial court made inquiry on the purported “conflict of interest” claim, but failed to conduct a Faretta inquiry. Thereafter, Balzourt’s request for self

- representation was denied. Failure to hold a proper Faretta hearing at a critical stage of the proceedings is reversible error. Eib v. State , 191 So. 3d 977, 979 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). Sentencing is a critical stage of the proceedings. Id. Appellate counsel was ineffective in not raising on direct appeal the trial court’s failure to conduct a Faretta inquiry. Given that Balzourt was sentenced to life, this error cannot be deemed harmless. Because a new appeal would be redundant, we grant the petition as to this issue and rema nd for a Faretta hearing. If Balzourt is allowed to represent himself following the Faretta hearing, the trial court is directed to vacate his present sentence and proceed with resentencing. We find the other issues raised in Balzourt’s petition to be without merit. PETITION GRANTED, in part; DENIED , in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER and LAMBERT , JJ., concur.

1 Faretta v. California , 422 U.S. 806, 835 (1975).
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Trulite, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A. Longaker,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
              /s/ James
                A.
                LongakerJames
                  A. Longaker
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
                June
                  7, 2006