alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                       
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Algeria  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Algeria  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 3,388   | 0       | 4,893  | 10,155 | 11,324 | 84,422 | 252,608
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 85,850 | 36,824 | 55,136 | 131,124 | 36,191  | 23,659 | 0      | 0      | 17,490 | 42,163 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 84,193 | 63,596 | 43,116 | 81,685  | 50,778  | 17,918 | 35,325 | 65,675 | 68,567 | 75,763 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 46,947 | 64,945 | 26,584 | 53,423  | 120,343 | 97,157 | 17,449 | 77,299 | 0      | 0      
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0       | 0       | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0       |         |        |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
U-Boom

Reduce heat radiation and fire risk 

from burners to an offshore rig

A MODULAR BOOM DESIGN FOR FLARING OPERATIONS

Burners efficiently dispose of oil produced at the surface during offshore well tests, but the flares must be

kept at a safe distance from the rig structure. To reduce heat radiation onto an offshore platform or drillship

and to protect rig personnel, the burners are supported by long booms. 

The U-boom is a modular design, typically consisting of two sections that extend approximately 18 m [60 ft].

By adding an intermediate section, the boom can be lengthened to about 26 m [85 ft]. 

The structural design of the U-boom allows access to the burner and supports pipes that are laterally positioned

on the boom sides. These pipes supply the burner with air, water, oil, and propane. 

The U-boom is mounted on the rig with a rotating base plate and guy lines. Horizontal guy lines help orient the

boom; and vertical guy lines, which are fixed to the rig’s main structure, support the boom. The rotating base

enables horizontal and vertical positioning of the boom and burner. The boom is positioned slightly above

horizontal so that any oil left in the piping after flaring operations does not leak out and cause pollution.

To ensure nonhazardous burning in changing wind directions, two booms are typically installed on opposite

sides of the drilling platform or drillship.

U-boom.

Pilot line

Cable

Oil line

Water line

Water-wall screen line

Air line

Gas line

Additional gas line

APPLICATIONS

■ Provide support for the burner

and piping.

■ Allow access to the burner and

piping.

BENEFITS

■ Reduce heat radiation.

■ Protect rig personnel. 

■ Limit burner noise on the rig. 

FEATURES

■ Modular design

■ Suitable for H2

S service

■ Available in two or three 

sections 

■ Piping for oil, water with filter,

air with check valve, and

propane, in addition to one 

gas flare
07-WT-053 November 2007 

Copyright © 2007 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.

U-Boom

www.slb.com/welltesting

Specifications

Model UBM-DA UBM-EA UBM-F UBM-G

Service H2S H2S H2S H2S

Length, m [ft] 18 [60] 26 [85] 18 [60] 26 [85]

Width, m [ft] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92] 0.89 [2.92]

Weight, kg [lbm] 4,900 [10,803] 6,900 [15,212] 4,900 [10,803] 6,900 [15,212]

Working temperature, degC [degF] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212] –20 to 100 [–4 to 212] 0 to 100 [32 to 212] 0 to 100 [32 to 212]

Wind capacity,† km/h [mi/h] 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity 160 [99] lateral velocity

Connections, Fig. 602 female/male

Air, mm [in] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4] 101.6 [4]

Oil, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3]

Gas ‡, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3]

Water, mm [in] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3] 76.2 [3]

Applicable codes ANSI§ B31.3 ANSI B31.3 ANSI B31.3 ANSI B31.3

† Dynamic, no ice

‡ Optional 101.6-mm [4-in] and 152.4-mm [6-in] connections are available.

§ American National Standards Institute
No. 12-6626.

#### Cephus *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|New Jersey Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|New Jersey Natural Gas Supplemental Gas - Propane Air  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 577    | 1,308  | 786    | 536    | 465    | 77     | 31     | 6      | 8      | 10    
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 25     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 44     | 0      | 11     | 15     | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        | 0      |        |        |        |       
|2010's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 0      |        | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
No. 11-11084.

#### Tormenia *v.*Contursi et al.

Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 810] denied.
SIFI 12.31.2011 EX 10.15


Exhibit 10.15


AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
SAVINGS INSTITUTE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN


Effective December __, 2011, the Amended and Restated Savings Institute Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by deleting Section 3.5 in its entirety and replacing it with the following new Section 3.5: 
    
    
“3.5    Change in Control Benefit.  If a Participant terminates employment with the Bank following a Change in Control (as such event is defined under Section 409A of the Code and the regulatory guidelines issued thereunder) (other than for Cause), there shall be paid to the Participant an amount equal to the actuarial equivalent lump sum present value of the benefit set forth in Section 3.1 determined as if the Participant retired as of the Change in Control date and without regard to whether the Participant attained his or her Normal Retirement Age as of said date. The Bank shall pay the benefit under this Section 3.5 to the Participant in a lump sum within 30 days of the Participant's termination of employment, unless said payment is delayed pursuant to Section 409A of the Code.”






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Savings Institute Bank and Trust Company and __________________ have caused this Amendment to be executed on the ______ day of December, 2011


		
	ATTEST:
	SAVINGS INSTITUTE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY






____________________            ____________________________________
For the Board of Directors




WITNESS:                    EXECUTIVE








_____________________            ______________________________________
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the
Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015 as amended by Amendment No. 2 thereto (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form
20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                            |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: July 20, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ FERNANDO BOSQUE MOHÍNO
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Fernando Bosque Mohíno 
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Dated: July 20, 2016 |  |  |  | /s/ SAÚL VILLARREAL GARCÍA
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                      |  | Saúl Villarreal García 
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 19, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
W. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Douglas W. Dougherty
-----------------------------------
Douglas W. Dougherty
Chief Financial Officer
August 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.3



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 8, 2005
# C_2019392EN.01000401.xml

| 19.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia

(2019/C 392/04)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (2), concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia.

The Council intends to renew the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP. The Council holds on its file new elements concerning all persons listed in the Annex to Decision 2011/72/CFSP and in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.The persons concerned are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the information that relates to them, before 25 November 2019, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

---
EXHIBIT 21



THE ROWE COMPANIES

AND
WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



The Company has five wholly-owned subsidiaries:



| | (1) | Rowe Furniture, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
| | --- | --------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Rowe Properties, Inc., a California Corporation
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Rowe Furniture Wood Products, Inc., a California Corporation (formerly The Wexford Collection, Inc.)
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Rowe Diversified, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Storehouse, Inc., a Georgia Corporation
| | --- | ---------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 98

Relating to the disapproval of the President's exercise of authority to 
increase the debt limit, as submitted under section 3101A of title 31, 
                United States Code, on January 12, 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2012

 Mr. Reed (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Schilling, Mr. Sam Johnson 
  of Texas, Mrs. Black, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Paul, Mr. Boustany, Mr. 
    Womack, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Woodall, and Mr. Quayle) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Relating to the disapproval of the President's exercise of authority to 
increase the debt limit, as submitted under section 3101A of title 31, 
                United States Code, on January 12, 2012.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves of 
the President's exercise of authority to increase the debt limit, as 
exercised pursuant to the certification under section 3101A(a) of title 
31, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Marketed Production  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2     | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | ---------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           | 4,734,715  | 4,894,291 | 4,961,117 | 4,983,373 | 5,068,868 | 5,102,806 | 5,167,180 | 5,005,568
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5,240,909 | 5,229,075 | 5,084,012  | 5,189,998 | 5,022,369 | 5,239,469 | 5,523,237 | 6,093,951 | 6,913,906 | 6,781,162
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,686,719 | 7,089,072 | 7,458,989  | 7,619,582 | 7,973,818 | 7,881,157 | 7,217,930 | 7,218,863 | 8,037,539 | 9,375,530
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 9,810,701 | 9,947,857 | 10,826,569 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-11300

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERVANDO MEDRANO-JASSO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CR-037-ALL-C

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Servando Medrano-Jasso appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He

argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. 

Medrano-Jasso maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment

which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 03-11300

-2-

argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of

imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Medrano-Jasso acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.