alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Oklahoma Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 377,189 | 364,887
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 362,616 | 362,616 | 359,616 | 359,616 | 363,593 | 364,593 | 395,087 | 396,087 | 394,827 | 394,827
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 378,137 | 382,000 | 389,767 | 384,838 | 383,638 | 378,738 | 380,038 | 373,738 | 371,324 | 371,338
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 371,338 | 372,838 | 370,838 | 370,535 | 375,935 | 375,143 | 376,228 | 376,528 | 372,191 | 372,191
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 372,390 | 372,655 | 372,655 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### U.S. Bank v. Tomlinson

111,081

08/20/2015

Denied

Unpublished
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K.
Spohr, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Monitor Trust III - Series J for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |               
|------------------ |  | --------------
|/s/ David K. Spohr
|Name:              |  | David K. Spohr

|       |  |                                                          
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Director of Fund Administration
|       |  | (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)                 
|       |  | Kenmar Preferred Investments Corp.                       
|       |  | Managing Owner of                                        
|       |  | World Monitor Trust III                                  
|       | 
|Date:  |  | March 18, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.4  Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ Terry A. Hanson Terry A. Hanson Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary Date: August 7, 2007
# C_2019070EN.01000802.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9169 — Caisse des dépôts et consignations/Swiss Life/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 70/03)

On 12 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9169. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9169. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Utah Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Utah Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 4,079  | 5,945  | 6,478 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 10,544 | 15,141 | 15,439 | 14,484 | 9,423  | 12,239 | 28,953 | 56,438 | 55,374 | 49,984
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 48,399 | 40,138 | 47,138 | 49,562 | 58,780 | 56,449 | 59,684 | 40,830 | 61,161 | 67,386
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 67,226 | 75,956 | 79,666 | 87,661 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
Fourth Amendment to the Loan Extension & Release & Waiver Agreement



 Exhibit 10.51 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 LOAN EXTENSION AND RELEASE 
 AND WAIVER AGREEMENT 
  
 This Fourth Amendment to the Loan Extension and Release and Waiver Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and between Polar Molecular
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Affiliated Investments L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company (the “Holder”), to be effective as of June 20, 2003. 
  
 RECITALS 
  

	A.	 	The Company and the Holder have entered into a Loan Extension and Release and Waiver Agreement, as amended (the “Original Loan Extension”); and 


 

	B.	 	The Company and the Holder now wish to amend the Original Loan Extension to provide for an extended maturity date on a portion of the amount outstanding. 


 
 AGREEMENT 
  
 In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises contained herein,
the Holder and the Company hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	 	The Company acknowledges owing interest and other obligations on the $649,000 principal balance as of January 31, 2003 and accruing on and after January 31, 2003. $75,000 of the
principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest on the $75,000 principal balance (collectively, the “Amount Due at Closing”), is due at the time of the merger (the “Closing”) between the Company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Murdock Communications Corporation (“Murdock”). All other amounts owed under the Note are due by December 31, 2003, provided that the Company shall be obligated to prepay before December 31, 2003 any
remaining amounts under the Note to the extent of the net proceeds (after commissions or underwriting fees) of any sale of securities made by the Company or Murdock (or its successor) after the Closing. 

  

	2.	 	As additional security for the Amount Due at Closing, the Company shall cause Berthel Fisher & Company Financial Services, Inc. to enter into the agreement attached hereto.


  

	3.	 	No Other Changes. Except as explicitly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Business Loan Note, related loan documents, and the Original Loan
Extension shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 The undersigned have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date set forth herein. 

 

	COMPANY:	 	

  

	POLAR	 	MOLECULAR CORPORATION 

  
 By:   /s/ Mark L. Nelson                     
          Mark L. Nelson, President and 
          Chief Executive Officer 
  
 HOLDER: 
  

	AFFILIATED	 	INVESTMENTS, L.L.C. 

  
 By:   /s/ Karen M. Dobleske                      
         Name:  Karen M. Dobleske             

         Title:     Vice President
103P16

#### Louis Cherry and Marsha Gordon v. Gail Wiesner, City of Raleigh, and Raleigh Board of Adjustment City of Raleigh, a Municipal Corporation v. Raleigh Board of Adjustment, Louis W. Cherry, III, Marsha G. Gordon and Gail P. Wiesner

Respondent’s (Gail Wiesner) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-155)

Denied
September 10, 2010 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Economic Impact Analysis for Chromium Electroplating RTR 

FROM: Tom Walton 

Economist 

ABCG (C439-02) 

TO: Phil Mulrine 

 Engineer 

MMG (D243-02) 

This document addresses the economic impacts of Chromium Electroplating NESHAP: 

a phase-out of PFOS-based fume suppressants, and housekeeping procedures. 

Both the magnitude of control costs needed to comply with the rule and the distribution 

of these costs among affected facilities can have a role in determining how the market 

will change in response to rule. Total annualized costs for a phase-out of PFOS-based 

fume suppressants is $261,000 for 806 plants. Total annualized costs for housekeeping 

procedures are estimated to be $2,000,000 for 1,770 plants. Together the estimated cost 

is $2,300,000. 

Because sales information was not available at the facility level, 2002 Economic Census 

Industry Series Reports were used to develop average value of shipments estimates for 

two different levels of employment for an average plant. Facilities that are subject to the 

Chromium Electroplating NESHAP are generally classified under NAICS Code 332813, 

which includes facilities engaged in electroplating, plating, polishing, anodizing, and 

coloring. In addition to plants that perform chromium electroplating, this NAICS code 

also covers other facilities that perform other types of electroplating. The Small Business 

Administration definition for NAICS 332813 is less than 500 employees. In 2006, 2,622 

of the 2,659 firms or almost 99% of the firms were small. See 

the table on the next page. All costs and sales are in 2009 dollars. 
The total costs are estimated assuming that a subset of the 1,770 plants incur costs. To 

assess the possibility of small business and market impacts, the maximum possible cost 

was compared to average value of shipments as a estimate of business receipts. In the 

above table costs as a percentage of business receipts is always less than 0.66%. This 

would not be considered a significant impact on small business. Whether these costs are 

absorbed by the plants or passed on by higher prices, market impacts are expected to be 

quite small. 

Highest Plant Costs for Proposed PFOS Phase-Out and 

Housekeeping Requirements 

 

 

Option Cost per 

plant, $/yr 

Notes Average 

business 

receipts 

($) 

Cost as a 

percentage 

of receipts 

Require phase-out of PFOS fume 

suppressants 

 

Small Plants (1-20 employees) 

Hard Chromium Electroplating $2,647 $636,614 0.42% 

Decorative Chromium 

Electroplating 

$1,910 $636,614 0.30% 

Chromium Anodizing $2,647 $636,614 0.42% 

Other Plants (21 - 99 employees) $0 Not 

applicable

$4,009,710 0.00% 

Require specific housekeeping 

procedures 

 

Small Plants (1-20 employees) $1,516 $636,614 0.24% 

Other Plants (21 - 99 employees) $2,923 $4,009,710 0.07% 

Both phase-out of PFOS & 

Housekeeping 

 

Small Plants (1-20 employees) 

Hard Chromium Electroplating $4,163 $636,614 0.65% 

Decorative Chromium 

Electroplating 

$3,426 $636,614 0.54% 

Chromium Anodizing $4,163 $636,614 0.65% 

Other Plants (21 - 99 employees) $2,923 $4,009,710 0.07%
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 589 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 589

 To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and 
   Election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2010

   Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. Bennett) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and 
   Election of the President and Vice President of the United States.

    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Committee on Rules and Administration shall prepare 
        a revised edition of the document entitled Nomination and 
        Election of the President and Vice President of the United 
        States (Senate Document 106-16);
            (2) the revised document described in paragraph (1) shall 
        be printed as a Senate document; and
            (3) there shall be printed, beyond the usual number, 600 
        additional copies of the revised document described in 
        paragraph (1) for the use of the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 729-730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31731]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9767-7; CERCLA-04-2013-3752]

Leonard Chemical Superfund Site; Catawba, York County, SC; Notice 
of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement to 
recover outstanding cost from three parties who did not participate in 
a previous Consent Decree to perform a Remedial Action at the Leonard 
Chemical Superfund Site located in Catawba, York County, South 
Carolina.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
February 4, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Leonard Chemical Superfund 
Site by one of the following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov

[[Page 730]]

     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street 
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: December 7, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-31731 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 85 

Disapproving the rule of the Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department of Agriculture with respect to the establishment of a Christmas 

tree promotion, research, and information program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2011 

Mr. SCALISE (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. 

HULTGREN) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving the rule of the Agricultural Marketing Service 

of the Department of Agriculture with respect to the 

establishment of a Christmas tree promotion, research, 

and information program. 

Whereas the Department of Agriculture has issued a final 

rule which will tax Christmas trees sold by producers or 

importers who sell more than 500 trees in a year; and 

Whereas in tough economic times the last thing the Federal 

Government should be doing is levying a tax that will hit 

millions of American families who celebrate Christmas: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 85 IH 

1 That Congress disapproves of the rule submitted by the 

2 Agricultural Marketing Service of the Department of Agri3 culture relating to the establishment of a Christmas tree 

4 promotion, research, and information program (published 

5 at 76 Federal Register 69094 (November 8, 2011)), and 

6 such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS