alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
233P16

#### State v. Alonzo Antonio Murrell

1. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1097)

2. State’s Motion to Deem Petition Timely Filed

3. State’s Petition in the Alternative for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

4. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

5. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed

2. Allowed

3. Dismissed as moot

4. Allowed 06/22/2016

5. Allowed
# C_2019055EN.01000301.xml

| 12.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/3

---

Communication on the publication of the amounts of raw milk production as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

(2019/C 55/04)

| Annual data (1000 t) |
| --- |
| Amounts of raw milk production (*2) as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 |
| 2017 | Cow | Ewe | Goat | Buffalo |
| BE | 4 031,00 | 0,00 | 34,00 | 0,00 |
| BG | 968,18 | 69,38 | 43,54 | 10,38 |
| CZ | 3 079,21 | 0,02 | 0,05 | 0,00 |
| DK | 5 502,20 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 |
| DE | 32 598,20 | 0,01 | 15,97 | 0,00 |
| EE | 790,00 | 0,00 | 0,60 | 0,00 |
| IE | 7 498,94 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 |
| EL | 670,00 | 806,00 | 331,00 | 0,00 |
| ES | 7 229,35 | 564,78 | 506,43 | 0,00 |
| FR | 25 007,64 | 303,91 | 631,71 | 0,00 |
| HR | 648,00 | 9,00 | 11,00 | 0,00 |
| IT | 12 198,88 | 480,08 | 61,28 | 242,99 |
| CY | 216,39 | 32,29 | 30,36 | 0,00 |
| LV | 998,00 | 0,00 | 2,10 | 0,00 |
| LT | 1 566,65 | 0,00 | 4,06 | 0,00 |
| LU | 387,18 | 0,09 | 3,18 | 0,00 |
| HU | 1 967,50 | 1,81 | 3,68 | 0,00 |
| MT | 41,03 | 0,86 | 0,00 | 0,00 |
| NL | 14 501,00 | 0,00 | 320,00 | 0,60 |
| AT | 3 712,73 | 11,98 | 23,08 | 0,00 |
| PL | 13 694,47 | 0,55 | 7,36 | 0,00 |
| PT | 1 921,21 | 73,77 | 25,79 | 0,00 |
| RO | 3 797,70 | 386,80 | 238,30 | 16,40 |
| SI | 647,99 | 0,50 | 1,48 | 0,00 |
| SK | 911,73 | 11,41 | 0,26 | 0,00 |
| FI | 2 405,76 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 |
| SE | 2 816,66 | 0,00 | 0,00 | 0,00 |
| UK | 15 443,00 | 6,76  (*3) | 44,25  (*3) | 0,00 |
| EU-28 | 165 250,60 | 2 760,00 | 2 339,48 | 270,37 |

Annual data (1000 t)

Amounts of raw milk production (*2) as referred to in Article 149(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013

2017

Cow

Ewe

Goat

Buffalo

BE

4 031,00

0,00

34,00

0,00

BG

968,18

69,38

43,54

10,38

CZ

3 079,21

0,02

0,05

0,00

DK

5 502,20

0,00

0,00

0,00

DE

32 598,20

0,01

15,97

0,00

EE

790,00

0,00

0,60

0,00

IE

7 498,94

0,00

0,00

0,00

EL

670,00

806,00

331,00

0,00

ES

7 229,35

564,78

506,43

0,00

FR

25 007,64

303,91

631,71

0,00

HR

648,00

9,00

11,00

0,00

IT

12 198,88

480,08

61,28

242,99

CY

216,39

32,29

30,36

0,00

LV

998,00

0,00

2,10

0,00

LT

1 566,65

0,00

4,06

0,00

LU

387,18

0,09

3,18

0,00

HU

1 967,50

1,81

3,68

0,00

MT

41,03

0,86

0,00

0,00

NL

14 501,00

0,00

320,00

0,60

AT

3 712,73

11,98

23,08

0,00

PL

13 694,47

0,55

7,36

0,00

PT

1 921,21

73,77

25,79

0,00

RO

3 797,70

386,80

238,30

16,40

SI

647,99

0,50

1,48

0,00

SK

911,73

11,41

0,26

0,00

FI

2 405,76

0,00

0,00

0,00

SE

2 816,66

0,00

0,00

0,00

UK

15 443,00

6,76  (*3)

44,25  (*3)

0,00

EU-28

165 250,60

2 760,00

2 339,48

270,37

---

(1)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(*1)  0,0: zero or less than half the unit

(*2)  2017 Milk Production on the farm Eurostat — NewCronos Products Obtained.

(*3)  Communicated by Member State and/or estimated/calculated production.

---
246P16-2

#### In the Matter of the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Christopher C. Friscia and Maria A. Friscia in the Original Amount of $161,600.00 Dated March 10, 2006, Recorded in Book 20146, Page 24, Mecklenburg County Registry

Petitioners’ *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal

Dismissed
279P16

#### In the Matter of M.A.W.

1. Petitioner’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1153)

2. Petitioner’s Motion to Deem PDR Timely Filed

3. Petitioner’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Decision of COA

1. Dismissed

2. Denied

3. Allowed
EXHIBIT 12  Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 (In thousands)   EarningsNet income before minority interest$30,678Equity earnings(4,196)Income distribution from equity investees3,327Minority interest in pretax income(1,546)Amortization of capitalized interest257Interest capitalized(92)Federal and state income taxes18,313Fixed charges10,581Total Earnings as Defined$57,322Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$9,538Interest on rentals*527Amortization of debt issuance costs341AFUDC - borrowed funds83Capitalized interest92Total Fixed Charges$10,581Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges5.42X  *Management believes that using one-third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
# C_2019376EN.01004401.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/44

---

European GNSS Agency

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/44)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.gsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/gsa_annual_accounts_2018.pdf

---
#### COM. v. MOSSES, A.

3504 EDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

CP-51-CR-0013782-2014 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### Bobby COOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D17-1003

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-13685CF10A.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SoTech, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2007, I, William D. Harper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  March 21, 2008 SoTech, Inc. By:  /s/William D. Harper William D. Harper  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SoTech, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2007, I, Mary Fortino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  March 21, 2008 SoTech, Inc. By:  /s/Mary Fortino Mary Fortino
#### Quinell ALLEN, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 10, 2017

L.T. NO.: 10-23487

Dismissed.
# C_2019376EN.01003201.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/32

---

European Training Foundation

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/32)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://www.etf.europa.eu/en/document-attachments/annual-accounts-2018-and-govering-board-opinion

---
# C_2019434EN.01000501.xml

| 27.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 434/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 434/5

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.9596 — ENGIE/Predica/Omnes/Langa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 434/05)

Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004

On 22 November 2019, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (‘Merger Regulation’).

On 18 December 2019, the notifying parties informed the Commission that they withdrew their notification.

---

(1)  Publication in OJ C 403, 22.11.2019, p. 70.

---
#### Sansom Reporting, Inc., Respondent, *v.*Feiner, Klaris & Curtis et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 20, 1971.

*Frank M. Nigro*and *Jesse Sobol*for appellants. *Harry Salvan*for respondent.

*216
      *Per Curiam.*

Defendants, members of a law firm, ordered from plaintiff daily copy of the minutes of a hearing before the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with a matter involving their client. Although the order blank was signed by a member of the firm in individual name it identified the case and included the name of the client. There is no showing that the attorneys intended to be personally liable for these minutes and, in these circumstances, under established law they are not responsible. (For the general rule of the law of agency see *Mencher*v. *Weiss,*306 N. Y. 1,4 and cases there cited; for the specific rule relating to attorneys see *Matter of May,*27 N Y 2d 529 and cases there cited.)

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendants dismissing the complaint.

Concur — Gold, J. P., Quinn and Lupiano, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,245
<PP&E>                                           5,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                      65
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,387
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   219
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)
        

</TABLE>
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
# C_2019245EN.01000801.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/8

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9411 — Parker-Hannifin Corporation/Lord Corporation)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 245/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Parker-Hannifin Corporation (“Parker”, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (“Parker”, United States),

| — | Lord Corporation (“Lord”, United States). |
| --- | --- |

—

Lord Corporation (“Lord”, United States).

Parker acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Lord.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Parker is the holding company of the Parker Group, which manufactures motion control technologies, fluid purification, fluid and fuel control products, process instrumentation, air conditioning, refrigeration, electromagnetic shielding and thermal management products, |
| --- | --- |

—

Parker is the holding company of the Parker Group, which manufactures motion control technologies, fluid purification, fluid and fuel control products, process instrumentation, air conditioning, refrigeration, electromagnetic shielding and thermal management products,

| — | Lord is a global and diversified technology and manufacturing company offering diverse mix of products including adhesives, coating, aerospace vibration and motion control systems. |
| --- | --- |

—

Lord is a global and diversified technology and manufacturing company offering diverse mix of products including adhesives, coating, aerospace vibration and motion control systems.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9411 — Parker-Hannifin Corporation/Lord Corporation

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax: +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax: +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7749
THOMAS ANTHONY BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-264, CA-93-1574) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 25, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Anthony Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion and find no error in construing Appellant's pleading as a motion pursuant to § 2255 or in the court's decision on the merits. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Berry v. United States , Nos. CR-85-264; CA-93-1574 (D. Md. Oct. 10, 1995). We note that the district court's disposal of Appellant's claims forecloses a conclusion of prosecutorial misconduct. We deny Appellant's motion to remand the case for further factual findings and dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.3



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Gary J. Wolter, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Gary J. Wolter

Gary J. Wolter

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 8, 2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3016

_____________________________ D’ A NTONIO K EITH W ARREN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie Kinsey , Judge

. May 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R AY , B ILBREY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Kasey Lacey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for A ppellee.
#### Javier ABREU-PEREZ, DOC #526775, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2262

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 1, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. . '

Affirmed.
|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                        
|View History:                                                         
|                                                                      
|Indiana Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      
|                                                                      
|Indiana Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                      

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 114,603 | 112,045
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 97,332  | 102,246 | 106,176 | 106,676 | 108,621 | 113,121 | 113,209 | 113,209 | 113,209 | 113,209
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 113,210 | 113,000 | 111,095 | 113,597 | 113,397 | 114,080 | 114,294 | 114,294 | 114,937 | 114,274
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 111,271 | 111,313 | 110,749 | 110,749 | 110,749 | 111,581 | 111,581 | 113,158 | 113,761 | 112,972
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 112,987 | 113,465 | 113,537 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
302P16

#### State v. Marshall Tristan Shaw (DEATH)

1. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Moore County

2. State’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed as moot
#### COM. v. EASLEY, B.

1729 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

CP-23-CR-0005981-2012 (Delaware)

Affirmed