alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019276EN.01000801.xml

| 16.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9196 — Marsh & McLennan Companies/Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 276/02)

On 22 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9196. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9196. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company:

We have examined managements assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the Genworth Global Funding Trusts 2005-A, 2007-A, 2007-B, 2007-C, 2007-D, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, and 2007-5 (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1, 2, 3(ii), 3(iii), 3(iv), and 4, which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the Companys
compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the
Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or
subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|                  
|Richmond, Virginia
|March 26, 2008
175P16

#### N.C. Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Medical Assistance v. Parker Home Care, LLC Division of Medical Assistance, N.C. Department of Health and Human Services v. Parker Home Care, LLC

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-1026; COA15-1033)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, et al. Motion for Leave to File *Amicus*Brief

1. Allowed 05/11/2016 Dissolved 12/08/2016

2. Denied

3. Denied

4. Dismissed as moot
3Z0-/&

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-12-00730-CR OFFENSE: 19.02

Johnny Gabriel Castro v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Travis

Affirmed in part;

COA DISPOSITION: Vacated in part TRIAL COURT: 403rd District Court

DATE: 03/13/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: D-l-DC-12-904069

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Johnny Gabriel Castro v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas CCA#: 320-/g

). Afr£u/f//rs Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: /d/fjffQ/T

JUDGE: £4 Lu*--C

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:_

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
December 10, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ZELENI GRISSMORE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00870

- CV V.

TARGET CORPORATION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on June 21, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Zeleni Grissmore.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                      15

          AGREEMENT made effective as of July 19, 1995 between LUNN INDUSTRIES,
INC. ("Borrower") and J.E. SHEEHAN & COMPANY,  INC. ("Lender")

          WHEREAS,  Borrower is the maker and Lender is the holder of a certain
promissory note dated January  17,  1995 in the principal amount of $100,000
(the "Promissory Note");

          WHEREAS, under the terms of the Promissory Note, (a) the principal
amount of $100,000, (b) a placement fee of $5,000 and (c) accrued interest in
the amount of $5,000 were due and payable on July 19, 1995 (the "Maturity
Date"); and

          WHEREAS, Borrower wishes and Lender is willing to extend the Maturity
Date upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.

          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements
hereinafter contained, the parties agree as follows:

         1.    On January 16, 1996, (the "Extended Maturity Date"), Borrower
shall pay to Lender the aggregate of the following amounts:

          (a)  principal amount of $100,000;

          (b)  placement fee of $5,000;

          (c)  accrued interest at the rate of 10% per annum on the principal
               amount from January 17, 1995 to July 19, 1995 at the rate of 10%
               per annum (i.e. $5,000); and

                                      16
<PAGE>

          (d)  accrued interest on the amount of $110,000 from July 19, 1995
               Lo date of payment at the rate of 10% per annum.

2.   All of the terms and conditions of the Promissory Note and all rights,
remedies and obligations thereunder remain in full force and effect except that
the Maturity Date thereof shall be deemed to be the Extended Maturity Date.

3.   In consideration for Lender's  agreement  herein,  Borrower shall and
hereby does issue to Lender Ten Thousand (10,000) shares of Borrower's common
stock (the "Shares").  Borrower shall use its best efforts to diligently cause
the Shares to be duly registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

4.   This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York. 
This Agreement shall not be amended or modified nor any provision thereof waived
except in a writing executed by the Lender.

                                   LUNN INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                   By:  /s/ Alan Baldwin
                                        ---------------------
                                   Name:     Alan Baldwin
                                   Title:    Chief Executive Officer


                                   J.E. SHEEHAN & COMPANY, INC.
                                   By:  /s/ Joseph E. Sheehan
                                        --------------------------
                                   Name:     Joseph E. Sheehan
                                   Title:    President

                                      17
Exhibit 4.2  


LICENCE NO: STS 462  



INDEPENDENT TELEVISION COMMISSION

BROADCASTING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED)  


LICENCE GRANTED TO VIASAT BROADCASTING UK LIMITED TO PROVIDE A SATELLITE TELEVISION SERVICE UNDER PART I OF THE BROADCASTING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED)  


 THE LICENCE  


        1.     The
Independent Television Commission (the "Commission") in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Part I of the Broadcasting Act 1990 as amended by the Broadcasting
Act 1996 hereby grants to Viasat Broadcasting UK Limited (the "Licensee") a licence (the "Licence") for the term of ten years and subject to the conditions set out in the Schedule, to provide the
satellite television service specified in the Annex (the "Licensed Service"). 


        2.     The
Licence shall come into force on 3 October 2001. 



	SIGNED FOR THE COMMISSION BY	 	/s/ [illegible]	 	Dated 26 September 2001







ANNEX TO LICENCE NO: STS 462  


The Licensed Service  



        The service known as TV3 Denmark and described in the application to the Commission dated 14 September 2001. 





LICENCE NO: NDS181  



INDEPENDENT TELEVISION COMMISSION  


BROADCASTING ACT 1990  


 LICENCE GRANTED TO TV6 BROADCASTING GROUP LIMITED TO PROVIDE A NON-DOMESTIC SATELLITE SERVICE UNDER PART I OF THE BROADCASTING ACT 1990  


THE LICENCE  


	1.
	The
Independent Television Commission (the "Commission") in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Part I of the Broadcasting Act 1990 hereby grants to TV6 Broadcasting Group
Limited (the "Licensee") a licence (the "Licence") for the term of ten years and subject to the conditions set out in the Schedule, to provide the non-domestic satellite service specified in the Annex
(the "Licensed service").



	2.
	This
Licence shall come into force on 4 June 1997. 






	SIGNED FOR THE COMMISSION BY	 	/s/ [illegible]	 	Dated 3 June 1997







ANNEX TO LICENCE NO. NDS181  


The Licensed Service  



        The service known as the TV6 channel and described in the application to the Commission dated 12 May 1997.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury General Corporation
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 8, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ GEORGE JOSEPH                     
|                       |  |  |  | George Joseph, Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certifications are being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
215P16

#### State v. Mickey Gene Mellon

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-459)

2. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay

3. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

4. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied

2. Allowed 06/15/2016 Dissolved 09/22/2016

3. Denied

4. Denied
July 31, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SIMULIS, L.L.C. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00383

- CV V.

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAP ITAL CORPORATION , Appel lee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, General Elect ric Capital Corporation, signed January 29, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Simulis, L.L.C., to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 7 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 7

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States waiving 
  the application of the first article of amendment to the political 
speech of corporations and other business organizations with respect to 
     the disbursement of funds in connection with public elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

    Ms. Kaptur introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States waiving 
  the application of the first article of amendment to the political 
speech of corporations and other business organizations with respect to 
     the disbursement of funds in connection with public elections.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``The first article of amendment does not apply to the political 
speech of any corporation, partnership, business trust, association, or 
other business organization with respect to the making of 
contributions, expenditures, or other disbursements of funds in 
connection with public elections.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ryan MINER

No. 2017-KK-1586

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

01/04/2018

*552ON SUPERVISORY WRIT TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS

PER CURIAM

. | Writ granted in part. Code of Evidence article 404(B)(1) embodies the settled principle that, evidence of other crimes may be admissible if the state establishes an independent and relevant reason for its admission. *State v. Taylor,*16-1124, p. 12 (La. 12/1/16), 217 So.3d 283, 292. It is the duty of the district court in its gatekeeping function to determine the independent relevancy of this evidence. *State v. Altenberger,*13-2518, pp. 7-8 (La. 4/11/14), 139 So.3d 510, 515; *State v. Garcia,*09-1578, pp. 54-65 (La. 11/16/12), 108 So.3d 1, 39. The district court must also balance the probative value of the other crimes, wrongs or acts evidence against its prejudicial effects before the evidence can be admitted. *State v. Henderson,*12-2422, pp. 1-2 (La. 1/4/13), 107 So.3d 566, 567-68. Here, testimony of one. codefendant at a prior unrelated trial that the two codefen-dants drove through the same neighborhood while armed with an AK.-47 just six weeks before the drive-by shootings with which they are now charged is admissible under the principles above. Defendant fails to show the district court erred in performing its gatekeeping function.

*553However, if the codefendant exercises his right not to testify, the admission of this evidence at the joint trial would certainly violate *Crawford v. Washington,*541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), in' which the United States Supreme Court held that the admission of testimonial hearsay statements violates the Confrontation Clause unless the hearsay declarant is unavailable at trial and the defendant has. previously had an opportunity to cross-examine the declarant about the subject of the hearsay statements. *Crawford,*541 U.S. at 68, 124 S.Ct. at 1374. Although' it is unknown at this time whether the codefendant will ultimately testify at trial, the risk of reversible error is too high under the circumstances to allow the joint trial to proceed after determining the other crimes evidence will be admitted. *See generally*La.C.Cr.P. arts. -495.Í, 704(2). Therefore, the. staté must now decide whether it wishes to sever the trials or jointly try the codefendants but not utilize this other crimes evidence at the joint trial. The matter is remanded to the district court to allow the state the opportunity to make this election and for further proceedings consistent with these views.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019028EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/8 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9257 — NEC/KMD)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 28/04)

1.

On 15 January 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019028EN.01000801-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | NEC Corporation (‘NEC’, Japan), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | KMD Holding APS (‘KMD’, Denmark), owned by the private equity firm Advent International and the Danish pension fund Sampension. |

NEC acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of KMD.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for NEC: a Japanese technology group providing equipment and IT solutions to the public and private sectors. Through its subsidiary Northgate Public Services Limited (‘NPS’), NEC provides IT services to the public sector in the UK.

—   for KMD: a Danish IT company active in the provision of IT solutions for local and central governments primarily in Denmark and the Nordic countries.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019028EN.01000801-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9257 — NEC/KMD

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019028EN.01000801-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019028EN.01000801-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### Kimberly N. COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-1770

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Scott C. DuPont, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2018403EN.01001301.xml

| 9.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 403/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 403/13

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2018/C 403/10)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 18.9.2018 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 18.9.2018-31.12.2018 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Stock or Group of stocks | CJM/SPRFMO |
| Species | Jack mackerel (Trachurus Murphyi) |
| Zone | SPRFMO Convention Area |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 21/TQ120 |

Date and time of closure

18.9.2018

Duration

18.9.2018-31.12.2018

Member State

Lithuania

Stock or Group of stocks

CJM/SPRFMO

Species

Jack mackerel (Trachurus Murphyi)

Zone

SPRFMO Convention Area

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

21/TQ120

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---