alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
15.1
 
 Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board
of Directors and Shareholders
 Mercury
General Corporation:
 
 We have
reviewed the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury General Corporation and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008, the related consolidated statements of
income and comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of cash
flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management.
  We
conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
  Based on
our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made
to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
  We have
previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of
Mercury General Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 25, 2008, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
  As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”,and SFAS No. 159, “The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”,as of January 1,
2008.
  /s/ KPMG
LLP
  Los
Angeles, California
 August 6,
2008
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(2)
                                 AMENDMENT TO
                             THE MEAD CORPORATION
                    THE CORPORATE LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
                                     2001

     WHEREAS, The Mead Corporation maintains The Mead Corporation The Corporate
Long Term Incentive Plan 2001 (the "Plan") and amendment of the Plan is now
deemed to be desirable;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan be, and it hereby is, amended as follows:

1.   Effective August 24, 2001, the last sentence of the first paragraph of
Attachment 1 to the Plan is deleted.

2.   Effective August 28, 2001, the following new second paragraph shall be
inserted after the first paragraph of Attachment 1 to the Plan:

     "The Corporation having entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
     as of August 28, 2001, with MW Holding Corporation, Michael Merger Sub,
     Westvaco Corporation, and William Merger Sub (the "Merger Agreement"), any
     Change in Control which would otherwise occur in accordance with the
     provisions of this Attachment 1 upon any approval by the shareholders of
     the Corporation of the Merger Agreement shall, for all purposes of the
     first paragraph of this Attachment 1 be deemed to occur instead at the
     Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement).  Further, any pro-rata
     award for the Change-in-Control Performance Period which, pursuant to
     clause (iii) of such first paragraph, thereby becomes payable immediately
     after the Effective Time shall be based on the level of actual achievement
     of the payout factors calculated by the funding formula through the
     Effective Time and not on any participant's individual incentive target."

     EXECUTED at Dayton, Ohio this 7th day of November, 2001.

                                       THE MEAD CORPORATION



                                       By: /s/ A. ROBERT ROSENBERGER
                                           --------------------------
                                           Its: Vice President (Human Resources)

ATTEST:


/s/ DAVID L. SANTEZ
-------------------
Assistant Secretary
# C_2019055EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9242 — EDF/Ares/Real estate asset)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 55/03)

On 6 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9242. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9242. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL RAYMOND YORK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3214 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 27, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Sabella, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Rocco J. Carbone, III, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |         |         |        | 1,632  | 222    | 0      | 0      | 2,384  | 0      | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 102,410 | 105,013 | 94,794 | 75,361 | 51,502 | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0       | 0       | 0      | 1,678  | 7,013  | 6,722  | 13,862 | 17,243 | 14,532 | 54,530
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 11,601  | 10,276  | 1,755  | 0      | 0      | 9,320  | 12,749 | 54,062 | 43,314 | 28,296
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 29,995  | 2,672   | 314    | 1,069  | 1,426  | 933    | 917    | 1,346  | 3,316  | 1,873 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,706   | 1,718   | 1,064  | 986    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|New Mexico Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|New Mexico Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,523,896
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,519,563 | 1,517,997 | 1,348,520 | 1,362,958 | 1,417,608 | 1,470,532 | 1,452,364 | 1,441,218 | 1,459,182 | 1,449,390
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,517,702 | 1,856,119 | 1,863,822 | 1,878,344 | 1,953,318 | 1,955,311 | 1,954,159 | 1,868,850 | 1,947,133 | 1,762,392
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,542,104 | 1,410,622 | 1,482,540 | 1,493,363 | 1,555,517 | 1,561,911 | 1,548,315 | 1,539,168 | 1,674,384 | 1,826,372
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,967,960 | 1,960,626 | 1,907,468 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### The SANDS OF KEY BISCAYNE ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0103

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 28, 2017

L.T. NO.: 13-488

Dismissed.
383P16

#### State v. Marvin Hakeem Johnson

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-732)

Denied
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|Maryland Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|Maryland Natural Gas Industrial Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 3.25   | 5.26   | 5.69  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7.86   | 9.07   | 7.42   | 9.57   | 10.62  | 12.17  | 12.86  | 11.59  | 13.46  | 10.70 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 9.05   | 8.61   | 8.01   | 8.47   | 9.94   | 9.70   | 8.80   | 9.84   | 9.14   | 10.07 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 8.85   | 9.10   | 12.22  | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### COM. v. SOTOLONGO, I.

2292 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.\

07/18/2017

CP-51-CR-0010422-2015 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### Kathy Jean GATZA, et al., petitioners, v. DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INC.

No. 17-1064.

Feb. 26, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United. States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Nanuk      Warman                                                                                            |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Name:  Nanuk      WarmanTitle:    Chief      Executive and Financial OfficerDate:    December      22, 2009 |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                          |   |   |

----
Exhibit
      23








**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have
      issued our reports dated February 17, 2006 accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and supplementary schedule in the Annual Report of
      Valpey-Fisher Corporation (formerly known as MATEC Corporation) and subsidiaries
      on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of said reports in Registration Statements
      of Valpey-Fisher Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-116001, effective
      May 28, 2004, File No. 333-94491, effective January 12, 2000, File
      No. 033-77554, effective April 8, 1994 and File No. 333-67726,
      effective August 16, 2001).








/s/
      Grant
      Thornton LLP





Boston,
      Massachusetts


March
      22,
      2006






-48-
332P16

#### Sandra D. Snipes and William J. Snipes v. Britthaven, Inc., Principle Long Term Care, Inc., Spruce LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Richmond Pines Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, and Fred McQueen, Jr., M.D.

1. Defs’ (Britthaven, Inc., Principle Long Term Care, Inc., and Spruce LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Richmond Pines Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center) Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-291)

2. Defs’ (Britthaven, Inc., et al.) Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. Defs’ (Britthaven, Inc., et al.) Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1. Allowed 09/07/2016 Dissolved 12/08/2016

2. Denied

3. Denied
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History: Annual                                               
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|West Virginia Imputed Wellhead Value of Marketed Production  (Cost)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|West Virginia Imputed Wellhead Value of Marketed Production  (Cost)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |        |        |        | 551,067
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 567,681 | 589,857 | 547,820 | 598,413 | 482,116 | 413,951 |        | 0      | 0      | 0      
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       | NA      | NA      | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | NA      | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0       |         |        |        |        |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0529 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-050-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AW139Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 32 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions in this AD are intended to prevent degradation and complete loss of 

communications between the pilot and co-pilot during flight, impairing the co-pilot’s capability

to react immediately to operational difficulties, which could lead to subsequent loss of control of 

the helicopter. 

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $200

Labor per Helicopter

(110 x $85/work-hour) $9,350

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $9,550

Total US Fleet Cost $305,600

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: John VanHoudt