alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE****CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE TRUST 2005-D**

March15, 2006

 

Capital One Auto Finance Trust 2005-Dc/o Wilmington Trust Company1100 North Market StreetRodney Square North, Wilmington, Delaware 19890

 

Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch31 West 52nd StreetNew York, New York 10019

 

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.4 New York Plaza, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10004-2477

 

MBIA Insurance Corporation113 King StreetArmonk, New York 10504

 

Fitch, Inc.One State Street Plaza, 32nd FloorNew York, New York 10004

 

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services55 Water StreetNew York, New York 10041

 

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.99 Church StreetNew York, New York 10007

 

This Officer’s Certificateis being issued in accordance with Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2005 as amended or supplemented (the “Agreement”) byand among Capital One Auto Finance Trust 2005-D, as Issuer, Capital One AutoReceivables, LLC, as Seller, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor toJPMorgan Chase Bank) as Indenture Trustee and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc.,as Servicer (the “Servicer”). Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have themeanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

 

By his or her signaturebelow, the undersigned officer of the Servicer, certifies that effective as ofDecember 31, 2005:

 

(a)                      a review of the activities of the Servicerduring the calendar year ended on December 31, 2005 (or such shorter period asmay be applicable) and of performance under the Agreement has been made undermy supervision; and

 

(b)                     to the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Servicer has performed in all material respects its obligationsunder the Agreement throughout the calendar year ended on December 31, 2005 (orsuch shorter period as may be applicable).

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Officer’s Certificate as of thedate first above written.

 
|   | CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC., |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | as Servicer                     |
|   |                            |
|   | By:                             | /s/ Steve Richter |   |
|   | Name:                           | Steve Richter |   |
|   | Title:                          | Assistant Vice President |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SoTech, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2008, I, William D. Harper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  June 9, 2009 SoTech, Inc. By:  /s/ William D. Harper William D. Harper  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SoTech, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ending December 31, 2007, I, Mary Fortino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  June 9, 2009 SoTech, Inc. By:  /s/ Mary Fortino Mary Fortino
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 17, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 17, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18A1203. LARRY LEE AS GUARDIAN OF JOSHUA LEE et al. v. DIRECTV, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7656

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STANLEY HOBEREK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (5:99-cr-00013; 5:00-cv-00184)

Submitted: March 25, 2008 Decided: March 28, 2008

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hoberek, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Stanley Hoberek seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge,

treating his “Motion to Vacate Judgment of Section 2255 Entered in

this Case” and “Motion to Vacate Conviction Based Upon Previously

Unavailable Claim” as successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motions,

and dismissing them on that basis. The order is not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone,

369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the

district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive

procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-

84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Hoberek has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.

Additionally, we construe Hoberek’s notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive
- 3 -

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340

F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to

file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims

based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously

discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to

establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for

constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the

movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255

(2000). Hoberek’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria.

Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255

motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Mississippi River Coordinating Commission Meeting

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Mississippi 
River Coordinating Commission. Notice of this meeting is required under 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

MEETING DATE, TIME, AND ADDRESS: Wednesday, May 6, 1998; 2:00 p.m.; 
Council Chambers, Metropolitan Council, 230 East Fifth Street, St. 
Paul, Minnesota.
    An agenda for the meeting will include discussion of the functions 
of the Mississippi River Coordinating Commission and the range of 
alternatives for accomplishing those functions after the Commission 
sunsets. Public statements about matters related to the Mississippi 
National River and Recreation Area (MNRAA) will be taken.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent JoAnn Kyral, MNRAA, 175 
East Fifth Street, Suite 418, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612-290-4160).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mississippi River Coordinating 
Commission was established by Pub. L. 100-696, dated November 18, 1988.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Alan M. Hutchings,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-11078 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,214]


EOS Corp., Camarillo, CA; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on February 24, 1997 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on February 24, 1997 on behalf of workers at EOS 
Corporation, Camarillo, California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 31st day of March, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-9671 Filed 4-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
331A16

#### State v. Amanda Gayle Reed

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-363)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Swpersedeas*

1. Allowed 09/06/2016

2.
|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)              
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History: Annual                                        
|View History:                                               
|                                                            
|Ohio Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            
|                                                            
|Ohio Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,550,668
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,622,075 | 1,295,980 | 1,481,800 | 1,369,698 | 1,838,402 | 1,975,801 | 1,929,760 | 1,835,811 | 1,341,561 | 1,393,984
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,536,300 | 1,559,497 | 1,399,102 | 1,569,071 | 1,405,996 | 1,307,853 | 1,174,644 | 1,408,071 | 1,552,803 | 1,819,661
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,925,317 | 1,901,457 | 1,103,439 | 793,509   | 1,297,223 | 1,935,349 | 2,370,095 | 3,026,298 | 3,249,605 | 3,426,553
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3,623,890 | 3,739,533 | 3,645,808 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019402EN.01002501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 28.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/25 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9671 — Apollo/Blue Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 402/10)

1.

On 20 November 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019402EN.01002501-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Apollo Capital Management, L.P. (‘Apollo’, United States of America). |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Blue Group Hold Co Limited (‘Blue Group’, United Kingdom). |

Apollo acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the whole of Blue Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Apollo: investments in companies and debt issued by companies involved in various businesses throughout the world, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Blue Group: retail supply of home furniture in the United Kingdom under the brands Harveys Furniture and Bensons for Beds. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019402EN.01002501-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9671 — Apollo/Blue Group

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019402EN.01002501-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019402EN.01002501-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                          
|View History:                                                           
|                                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Electric Power Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        
|                                                                        
|U.S. Natural Gas Electric Power Price  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.78   | 2.40   | 2.62  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.38   | 4.61   | 3.68   | 5.57   | 6.11   | 8.47   | 7.11   | 7.31   | 9.26   | 4.93  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.27   | 4.89   | 3.54   | 4.49   | 5.19   | 3.38   | 2.99   | 3.51   | 3.68   | 2.99  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.49   | 5.43   | 7.51   | 3.49   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 80 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United Nations or NATO should 

investigate the treatment of black Africans in Libya. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 

Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United Nations 

or NATO should investigate the treatment of black Africans in Libya. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Sec3 retary of State should direct the permanent representative 

4 of the United States to the North Atlantic Treaty Organi5 zation (NATO) and the permanent representative of the 

6 United States to the United Nations to request that 

7 NATO and the United Nations, respectively, investigate 

8 the treatment of black Africans in Libya. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3089 CETRIC D. FLETCHER, SR.,

Petitioner,

V. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

SF0353080383-I-1. ON MOTION Before GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judqes. PER CURIAM. ORDER Cetric D. Fletcher, Sr. moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for reconsideration of the court's previous rejection of his petition for review. The Merit Systems Protection Board issued its final order on September 24, 2008. Fletcher received a copy of the Board's order the next day. Fletcher's petition was received by this court on December 9, 2008, 76 days after Fletcher received the Board's final order. Our review of a Board decision or order is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1), which provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, any petition for review must be filed within 60 days after the date the petitioner received notice of the final order or decision of the board." This filing period is "statutory, mandatory, [and]jurisdictional." Monzo v. Dept of Transportation, 735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir. 1984);

see also Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (the timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement that cannot be waived). Because Fletcher's petition was not received within 60 days of the date he received the Board's decision, we must dismiss his petition as untimely. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Fletcher's petition is dismissed. Fletcher's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (3) All sides shall bear their own costs. FOR THE COURT

FEB 6 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### U.S. COURT OF O FOR THE

### FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc: Cetric D. Fletcher, Sr. FEB n 6 2009 Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah, Esq. s19 r; FEB 6 2009 ISSUED AS A MANDATE:

2009-3089 2
#### Viola FOWLER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond C. McWilliams and Georgette DeFranco, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Linda A. McWilliams, Appellants, v. David A. BELNIAK, Alfred J. Belniak and Marlene M. Belniak, Appellees.

Case No. 5D16-2639

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Her-nando County, Donald E. Scaglione, Judge.

AFFIRMED.