alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-11826

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00002-SCB-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

MIQUEL HARRELL,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 30, 2013)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-11826 Date Filed: 12/30/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Miquel Harrell appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, of possession 

of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 

924(c). His sentence was reimposed to allow a timely appeal, following a grant of 

some section 2255 relief. On appeal, he argues that his trial counsel was 

ineffective for failing to advise him of the option to plead guilty to Count One in 

the indictment, attempted possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, but to 

proceed to trial on the firearm offense in Count Two. He also argues that the 

magistrate judge plainly erred during the plea colloquy by not explaining this 

option: pleading guilty to one count and not guilty to the other. We cannot 

consider Harrell’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal because 

the record on point is not sufficiently developed: for example, no district court fact 

findings. Instead, Harrell can attempt to raise this claim through a 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 motion. Especially given the lack of precedent on point, the magistrate 

judge did not plainly err in conducting the Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 plea colloquy: the 

judge separately explained the two charges, accepted Harrell’s guilty plea 

separately on each charge, and sufficiently explained Harrell’s right to persist in a 

plea of not guilty.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-11826 Date Filed: 12/30/2013 Page: 2 of 2
|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                                        
|                                                                                     
|Midwest Regions Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     
|                                                                                     
|Midwest Regions Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3   | Year-4   | Year-5   | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | -------- | -------- | -------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | --------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |        |        | 181,071  | -101,059 | -126,362 | 81,797 | 71,612 | 51,647 | -112,275
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -34,785 | 29,505 | 55,280 | -117,533 |          |          |        |        |        |         
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Deltron, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Henry Larrucea, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   /s/ Henry Larrucea Name: Henry Larrucea Title: Principal Executive and Financial Officer   Date: January 13, 2012
#### COM. v. MARCED, E.

2261 EDA 2014

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

CP-51-CR-0005207-2013

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed, Reversed and Vacated
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7453
ERIC D. SAUNDERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-1644) Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric D. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eric D. Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). Although this was a successive petition, the district court denied relief on the merits. Because Saunders did not obtain authorization from this court to file the petition in the district court, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                             
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|No chart available.                                                        
|No chart available.                                                        
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Missouri Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | NA     | NA    
|2010's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### State v. Ornelas

110,060

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### Joseph PIRELA, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0586

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 28, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-7907

Dismissed.
#### COM. v. DAVIS, V.

1814 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/13/2017

CP-51-CR-0636011-1990 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Michigan Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Michigan Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 7,642  | 2,330  | 1,719 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 378    | 788    |        |        | 63     | 176    | 327    | 981    | 1,401  | 2,169 
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 2,375  | 2,390  | 2,400  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,606  | 2,340  | 2,768 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340  | 2,340 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,340  | 2,340  | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019384EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/2

---

Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1893, and in Regulation (EU) 2017/2063, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1891 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela

(2019/C 384/02)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/1893 (2), and in Annex IV to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1891 (4) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 and Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela. The grounds for the listing of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 9 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, before 23 August 2020, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 13 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/2074 and Article 17(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2063.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.s

---

(1)  OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 60.

(2)  OJ L 291, 12.11.2019, p. 42.

(3)  OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 21.

(4)  OJ L 291, 12.11.2019, p. 13.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Jack E. Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of LSB.








/s/ Jack E. Golsen


Jack E. Golsen


Chairman of the Board and


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








November 5, 2009








This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
181A93-4

#### State v. Rayford Lewis Burke (DEATH)

Def’s Motion to Supplement the Printed Record on Appeal

Allowed

Ervin, J., recused
*

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that

oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the

record. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted September 13, 2005*

Decided September 14, 2005

Before

 Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

 Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

 Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 04-2473

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LEONARDO GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Southern

District of Indiana, Indianapolis

Division

No. 02-169-CR-03-M/F

Larry J. McKinney, 

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

Leonardo Garcia pleaded guilty to methamphetamine charges, see 21 U.S.C.

§§ 846, 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to a total of 188 months’ imprisonment. His

plea agreement includes an appeal waiver made contingent on receiving a sentence

at “the minimum level of the applicable sentencing guidelines range,” and though

his cooperation with the government earned him a sentence below the 235- to 293-

month range that otherwise would have applied, see U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, Garcia

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 04-2473 Page 2

appeals anyway. He argues that United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005),

requires resentencing. The government asks that we enforce the waiver and

dismiss the appeal.

Garcia filed his opening brief before our decision in United States v. Bownes,

405 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 2005), which holds that appeal waivers like this one executed

before Booker are enforceable whether or not the parties anticipated that decision,

id. at 636-37; see United States v. Cieslowski, 410 F.3d 353, 364 (7th Cir. 2005);

United States v. Peterson, 414 F.3d 825, 828-29 (7th Cir. 2005). Garcia seeks to

circumvent Bownes by arguing that a waiver cannot be enforced against a

defendant who is sentenced to a term of imprisonment above the “statutory

maximum,” see, e.g., United States v. Hicks, 129 F.3d 376, 377 (7th Cir. 1997),

which, Garcia says, is what happened to him. And while Title 21 expressly

authorizes up to 20 years’ imprisonment for dealing in the smallest amounts of

methamphetamine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C); Talbott v. Indiana, 226 F.3d 866,

869 (7th Cir. 2000), Garcia reasons that after Booker and Blakely v. Washington,

542 U.S. 296 (2004), the phrase “statutory maximum” means, not the longest term

allowed by the code section defining the offense, but instead the guideline range

calculated without judicial factfinding. We rejected this argument implicitly in

Bownes, 405 F.3d at 636-37, and did so explicitly in United States v. Lockwood, 416

F.3d 604, 608 (7th Cir. 2005).

 DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19704-19705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Hearing on Schools and Religions

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given pursuant to the provisions of the Civil 
Rights Commission Amendments Act of 1994, section 3, Public Law 103-
419, 108 Stat. 4338, as amended, and 45 CFR 702.3, that a public 
hearing before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights will commence on 
Wednesday, May 20, 1998, beginning at 9:30 a.m., in the YWCA Building, 
Conference Room 540, located at 624 Ninth Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20425.
    The purpose of the hearing is to collect information within the 
jurisdiction of the Commission, under 45 CFR 702.2, to examine the 
operation of the Equal Access Act and similar

[[Page 19705]]

laws and the adherence by the public schools to these laws and the 
Constitution in regard to religious freedom. The Commission is 
authorized to hold hearings and to issue subpoenas for the production 
of documents and the attendance of witnesses pursuant to 45 CFR 
701.2(c). The Commission is an independent bipartisan, factfinding 
agency authorized to study, collect, and disseminate information, and 
to appraise the laws and policies of the Federal Government, and to 
study and collect information with respect to discrimination or denials 
of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, 
color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the 
administration of justice.
    Hearing impaired persons who will attend the hearing and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter, should contact Betty 
Edmiston, Administrative Services and Clearinghouse Division at (202) 
376-8105 (TDD (202) 376-8116), at least five (5) working days before 
the scheduled date of the hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Brooks, Press and Communications (202) 367-8312.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 98-10403 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M