alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the Annual Report of Trulite, Inc. (the "Company") on Form      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities      and      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Wade Stubblefield,      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of      the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   |                                                                                                       |                                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                              | /s/                G.WADE STUBBLEFIELD |
|   | G.                Wade StubblefieldPrincipal                Financial OfficerApril                30, 2007 |

----
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 2, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1700 Lower Tribunal No. F97-13886B

________________ 

### Carlos Mandri, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge. Carlos Mandri, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before MILLER, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
ELISHA THOMAS JR.,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4234

Opinion filed January 12, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Elisha Thomas, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for 

postconviction relief. Because the circuit court has recently directed the state to file a 

response to the pending motion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding 
2

that where the trial court has issued a recent order to show cause, mandamus relief was 

not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to 

expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So. 2d 

1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

THOMAS, SWANSON, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Louisiana Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Louisiana Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 16,309
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 16,889 | 15,271 | 13,512 | 15,569 | 12,958 | 14,169 | 15,295 | 14,958 | 18,399 | 16,717
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15,700 | 16,350 | 17,100 | 16,939 | 20,734 | 18,838 | 17,459 | 18,145 | 19,213 | 18,860
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 19,137 | 19,318 | 19,345 | 18,802 | 18,660 | 18,347 | 17,774 | 17,452 | 16,153 | 15,741
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 14,867 |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 3.17   | 2.42   | 1.95   | 1.83   | 1.81  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1.91   | 1.81   | 1.84   | 2.02   | 1.86   | 1.48   | 1.96   | 2.15   | 1.95   | 2.23  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.97   | 4.43   | 3.13   | 5.23   | 5.80   | 8.09   | 6.83   | 6.83   | 8.58   | 4.14  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.46   | 4.09   | 2.79   | 3.73   | 5.22   | 2.84   | 2.18   | 2.55   | 2.58   | 2.46  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.02   | 3.71   | 6.14   | 3.23   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 64

 Expressing the sense of Congress that Social Security benefits should 
                            not be reduced.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2011

   Mr. Ellison (for himself, Mr. Honda, Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Jackson of 
  Illinois, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Conyers, Ms. McCollum, Mr. Deutch, Ms. 
 Clarke of New York, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Carson of Indiana, Mr. 
Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Matsui, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Sewell, Ms. 
 Schakowsky, Ms. Richardson, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Tonko, Mrs. Christensen, 
   Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Olver, and Mr. Rahall) submitted the following 
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress that Social Security benefits should 
                            not be reduced.

Whereas Social Security provides essential financial support to 54.8 million 
        people in the United States, including 35.1 million retired workers in 
        the Nation;
Whereas Social Security provides modest benefits averaging $14,000 per year for 
        retired workers, based on contributions paid into Social Security over a 
        worker's lifetime of employment;
Whereas Social Security can pay full benefits through 2035;
Whereas Social Security has no borrowing authority, currently has $2.7 trillion 
        in accumulated assets, and, therefore, does not contribute to the 
        Federal budget deficit; and
Whereas the citizens of the United States deserve thoughtful and fair Social 
        Security reform to protect current and future benefits and to ensure 
        ongoing retirement security for seniors, protections for persons who 
        become disabled, and benefits for the young children and spouses of 
        deceased and disabled workers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that appropriate reform to strengthen 
Social Security's long-term outlook should happen in a bipartisan 
fashion and should ensure that Social Security remains a critical 
source of protection for the people of the United States and their 
families without further increasing the retirement age or otherwise 
decreasing benefits.
                                 <all>
```
No. 12-5913.

#### Williams *v.*Beltran et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6352.

#### Zaleski *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Crestview Development Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip McDonald, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  February 13, 2007

 

/s/ Philip McDonald                                        

Signature:  Philip McDonald
| Title:    President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|

Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Crestview Development Corporation and will be retained by Crestview Development Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 25 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States regarding 

presidential election voting rights for residents of all United States territories and commonwealths. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN (for herself, Ms. BORDALLO, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced 

the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States regarding presidential election voting rights for 

residents of all United States territories and commonwealths. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 25 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. The right of citizens of the United 

5 States to vote in the election for President and Vice Presi6 dent shall not be denied or abridged by the United States 

7 or by any State on account of residency in a territory or 

8 commonwealth of the United States. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress shall have power to en10 force this article by appropriate legislation.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                               
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History: Annual                                                         
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Connecticut Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Connecticut Natural Gas Underground Storage Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 441    | 1,241  | 2,017  |        |        |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
LUIS M. HARRIS

,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al

. ,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 1365

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Kevin J. Carroll , Judge

.

Luis M. Harris, pro se

, App ellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Cedell Ian Garland, Assis tant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER

, RAY

, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
No. 12-5380.

#### Smart *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11323]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 U.S.C. 50.7, and 
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given that a proposed 
Consent Decree in United States v. Total Petroleum, Inc., Civil Action 
No. 97-182 P, was lodged on April 3, 1998, with the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.
    The Consent Decree settles an action brought under section 113 of 
the Clean Air Act (``the Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413, and the Standards of 
Performance for New Stationary Sources (``NSPS''), 40 CFR part 60, 
subparts A, Ka, VV, GGG, and QQQ. The Consent Decree provides for 
Total's payment of a civil penalty to the United States in the amount 
of $75,000, and requires Total to implement and complete a Pollution 
Reduction Supplemental Environmental Project (``SEP'') costing $315,700 
at its Ardmore, Oklahoma facility. The SEP involves the redesign of the 
alkylation neutralization system to minimize emissions to the 
atmosphere, eliminate the risk of soil, air and ground water 
contamination from the system and eliminate any risks to operators by 
installing a bulk dry line system with enclosed auger delivery into a 
sealed covered unit. The sealed covered unit will have double 
containment and leak detection system and scrubbers will minimize fumes 
and lime dust.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. Total Petroleum, Inc., DOJ Ref. #90-5-2-1-1985.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, Eastern District of Oklahoma, 1200 W. Okmulgee 
Street, Muskogee, Oklahoma 74401; the Region VI Office of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas; and 
at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, NW, 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 2005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent 
Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $5.75 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Walker Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-11323 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
```
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History: Annual                                            
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|Idaho Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                
|                                                                
|Idaho Natural Gas Exports to All Countries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 176    | 15     | 48     | 0      | 0      | 0      | 252    | 113   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 12     | 10     | 0      | 6      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 29     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,560  | 4      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024