alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether an 
instrument of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instrument shown below is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. 
Application may be examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 98-021. Applicant: University of California, 
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. Instrument: Electron Neutralizer. 
Manufacturer: Gammadata-Scienta, Sweden. Intended Use: The instrument 
is intended to be used for the study of the phenomena of 
superconductivity in high critical temperature materials during angle-
resolved experiments. The objective of these investigations is to study 
the electron structure and physical properties of superconducting 
materials. In addition, the instrument will be used to train graduate 
students in their thesis research. Application accepted by Commissioner 
of Customs: April 7, 1998.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-11147 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
138P16

#### Brad R. Johnson v. James R. Prevatte, Jr., Prevatte & Prevatte, PLLC

1. Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP15-667)

2. Pit’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA

1. Denied

2. Denied
### Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. 

### FAA- Directorate Identifier :

{{you make changes to th e values in the table below. you must ensure th e totals updat e accordingly. If they do not , click (or Tab ) into and then out of the changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

### Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection 3 

## s 2'>5 .f)il $0

**~ 2~5.00**  

### 431 $109.905.00 

## s fLO:) $ O .t:O $ OJ!(l I 

## s OJJIJ

**~** 0 .00 $ 0 U{) 

### I

**~** O.(}i) '!: 0.00 ; 

# ' U.GO

**~** 

# .. e Oi'

**~** 0.00 

## s

**n.o~·** 

### I 

## s 0 .0{1 } 0.00 

## s 0 00 I 

### ... .;) 0 

### uo

**~** 0.00 ) G.OO 

### "'

**~** 0.00 $ 0.00 

# s f).00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 ' 

# s 0 00 

# : s; . () 00 'f, 000 1-' 0.00 I 

### '5 {l 

### uo i (){!() $ 11.0(1 I "' ) (UJ(l 

# " o.no s O.f)U 

### I 

## s ( Oi'

**~** () 00 .... 0.00 

### I '.) O.UC

**~** 0.00 

### :.::

**0~·** 

### l 

## s G .O!J

**~** 0.00

**~** 111 10 

# ' I 

## s 0.00 I

**~** 0.00 O.DfJ

**~**

**-~** 

### I ' $ 0.00 $ 

## o.ou I 

## s t, '10 

### I ' 

# s O.fH! ) 0.00 i ') 

## o.no I 'J ().(}IJ $ 0.00 'S 0.00 I $ 0.00 $ 

### D. OO ( ' 

### .. O.D O The known number ofproducts 

### in compliance: 

### Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fleet: $109,905 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

### Replace Gear 4.0

**~** 34f' l(' $6,000 

### Sfl. 

## uo.oo 4.; !) .(,()

**~** 'l . !J(; 

# .. I I 

# s 0 I ! 1 

### I I q• J) 

### c.un I I $ O.t t 

### I

**~** !J :J£.1 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

### Executive Order 12866 : 

### Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? - YE S* D NO[gj *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant ? 

# 8 YES* D NO[gj *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities ? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 

# G YESD NO[gj Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation i n Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft opera ted in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

# G YE S* D NO[gj *Explanation :
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Douglas W. Dougherty, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 8, 2006      /s/ Douglas W. Dougherty   Douglas W. Dougherty   Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 1165

WELAI GRANT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 02173

- RDB )

Submitted : August 27, 2024 Decided: August 29, 2024

Before KING and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Welai Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Alexa Erin Ackerman, Assistant County Attorney, BALTIMORE CITY SOLICITOR’S OFFICE, Baltimore, Maryland; K ara Kiminsky Lynch, Michael Patrick Redmond, BALTIMORE CITY LAW DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1165 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/29/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Welai Grant appeals the district court’s order granting the Baltimore City Police Department summary judgment on Grant’s retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Grant v. Balt

. City Police Dep’t , No. 1:21

- cv - 02173

- RDB ( D. Md

. Feb. 1, 2024 ). We deny Grant’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1165 Doc: 16 Filed: 08/29/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### Albert COOPER, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0887

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 25, 2017

L.T. NO.: 91-21599'

Denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133247 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133247 

 COA: 264826 

Wayne CC: 05-001738-01

DAVID ANTHONY EDWARDS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2019058EN.01001201.xml

| 14.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/12

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force on imports into the Union of sodium cyclamate originating in the People’s Republic of China and Indonesia: change of address of a company subject to an individual duty rate

(2019/C 58/11)

Imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People’s Republic of China and Indonesia are subject to definitive anti-dumping duties (1) imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1160 (2).

One company located in People’s Republic of China, whose exports to the Union of sodium cyclamate are subject to an individual anti-dumping duty rate, informed the Commission that it had changed its official address as set out below.

The company asked the Commission to confirm that the change of address does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous address.

The Commission examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of address in no way affects the findings of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1160.

Therefore, the reference in Article 1(2) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1160 to:

| Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 90-168, Fangshui Road, Chemical Industry Zone, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China | A473 |
| --- | --- |

Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 90-168, Fangshui Road, Chemical Industry Zone, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China

A473

should be read as:

| Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 88 Panyao Road, Nanjing Chemical Industry Park, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China | A473 |
| --- | --- |

Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 88 Panyao Road, Nanjing Chemical Industry Park, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China

A473

The TARIC additional code A473 previously attributed to Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 90-168, Fangshui Road, Chemical Industry Zone, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PRC, shall apply to Golden Time Chemical (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd, No 88 Panyao Road, Nanjing Chemical Industry Park, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province.

---

(1)  Initially imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 435/2004 of 8 March 2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People’s Republic of China and Indonesia (OJ L 72, 11.3.2004, p. 1) (no longer in force).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1160 of 15 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of sodium cyclamate originating in the People’s Republic of China and Indonesia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ L 192, 16.7.2016, p. 49).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mercury
General Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                     |  |                                          |  | 
|----------------- |  |  |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 7, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ GABRIEL TIRADOR
|                  |  |  |  |                     |  | Gabriel Tirador, Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 12-5965.

#### Dean *v.*Uribe, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|South Central Regions Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|South Central Regions Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3   | Year-4  | Year-5   | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------ | ------- | -------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | --------
|2010's                                                                                                                            |         |        |         | 134,467  | -61,096 | -256,290 | 124,549 | 145,446 | 137,912 | -220,041
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -71,996 | 20,586 | 101,675 | -154,782 |         |          |         |         |         |         
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019306DE.01002201.xml

| 10.9.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 306/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2019

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 306/22

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung der Kommission — Leitlinien für die Umsetzung der Verordnung über das einheitliche digitale Zugangstor — Arbeitsprogramm 2019-2020

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 257 vom 31. Juli.2019
  )

(2019/C 306/05)

Seite 13, Abschnitt 4, Ziel 4.1: Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in Bezug auf das Zugangstor, Tabelle „Durchführung und Zeitangaben“, Spalte 2, Reihe 4:

Anstatt:

„Suchmaschinenoptimierung des Portals ‚Ihr Europa‘ für alle Suchmaschinen, die für die breite Öffentlichkeit zugänglich sind“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Suchmaschinenoptimierung des Suchbegriffs ‚Your Europe‘ für alle Suchmaschinen, die für die breite Öffentlichkeit zugänglich sind“.

---
Exhibit 31       Rule 13a-14(d) Certification



                                            CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas G. Lehmann, First Vice President of WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WaMu Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR17;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated third parties acting as servicers
and sub-servicers:




None


Dated: March 30, 2006


                                     /s/ Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Thomas G. Lehmann
                                     First Vice President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 130

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Monza Ventures Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended November 30, 2006 filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), eachof the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 

| February 21, 2007 | By: /s/ "Andrew Wong"                                                    |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              | Andrew Wong, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief      Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
102P16

#### Kenneth C. Adams v. The City of Raleigh

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-782)

Denied