alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alex A. Bohm, Respondent, *v.*Ernest Holzberg, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 21, 1972.

*Paul L. Beck*and *Ernest Holzberg*for appellant. *Alex A. Bohm,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The parties are attorneys who, while sharing office space in November, 1967, were jointly retained to prosecute a wrongful death action. Both concur in the fact that, when retained, they orally agreed to equally share any resulting fee. The trial court found that at the time of retainer the parties did not discuss or agree upon a division of the services to be performed. .It was conceded that after some initial joint research, the parties agreed that plaintiff would handle all the settlement negotiations. Plaintiff successfully concluded a settlement, and there remained only the work of preparing and securing approval of an infant’s compromise order. The court found that plaintiff had performed 80% of the work on the case to that point. It was further conceded that plaintiff sought to have defendant handle the compromise order as his contribution to the joint venture. Defendant declined and, over the protest of plaintiff, retained another attorney to handle the compromise order. This outside attorney was eventually paid a fee of $500 which was charged as a disbursement in the ease. *470The trial court declined to enforce the equal fee division agreement on the theory that any division must be made in strict proportion to the services performed and responsibility assumed by each party.

Under Canon 34 of the former Canons of Ethics, in effect when this fee division agreement was made (and readopted as rule 603.5 of the Rules of Practice of the Appellate Division, 1st Dept.; see 22 NYCRR 603.5), there was no professional impropriety in agreeing .to an equal division of the net fee without a concomitant agreement for an equal division of the work and responsibility, provided there was some division of services and responsibility, and the party seeking to enforce the agreement actually performed some substantial services. Performance of initial legal research plus acceptance of responsibility for the infant’s compromise order rendered defendant’s participation “ substantial ”, so that the express agreement for equal division of the fee is enforceable (see *Jontow*v. *Jontow,*34 A D 2d 744; *Sterling*v. *Miller,*2 A D 2d 900, affd. 3 N Y 2d 778). However, the work on the infant’s compromise order by outside counsel was in furtherance of defendant’s contribution to the joint venture and the disbursement relating thereto should be chargeable to defendant alone.

The order should be reversed and judgment modified to the extent of reversing the dismissal of the counterclaim and judgment directed for defendant on his counterclaim in the sum of $714.50 with interest and costs, and as modified, affirmed, without costs.

Concur — Markowitz, J. P., Gold and Streit, JJ.

Order reversed and judgment modified, etc.
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas Non-Salt Underground Storage Injections  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|U.S. Natural Gas Non-Salt Underground Storage Injections  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           | 2,654,035 | 2,371,697 | 2,647,124 | 2,532,986 | 2,607,787 | 2,337,857
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 2,388,369 | 3,123,178 | 2,312,532 | 2,934,751 | 2,809,465 | 2,623,097 | 2,553,493 | 2,732,676 | 2,900,103 | 2,855,667
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 2,780,703 | 2,888,920 | 2,360,422 | 2,663,518 | 3,204,781 | 3,031,867 | 2,383,982 | 2,635,322 | 2,864,490 | 3,313,656
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,875,169 | 2,873,888 | 3,091,558 | 3,027,859 |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CRYSTAL HENDREN

,

Appellant,

v.

GABRIEL LAZAR

,

Appellee. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 141

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2020D CV 3449 )

O R D E R

After reviewing this case, the Court has determined that further briefing is necessary to

properly assess its jurisdiction. Therefore, we ORDER Appellant to, within 7 days of the date of

this order, file a letter brief with this Court addressing whether the trial court's order constitutes

an appealable interlocutory order. Appellee ’ s response, if any, will be due within 5 days of the

filin g of Appellant's letter brief.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 7 th day of December , 2021

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2 – CFO
Certification








CMG HOLDINGS,
INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUNT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








In
connection with the Amended Annual Report of CMG Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James I. Ennis , CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for
the period covered by the Report.








By: /s/ James J.
Ennis


James J.
Ennis


Chief
Finnancial Officer





August 28,
2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 ("Section 906"), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to CMG Holdings, Inc., and will be retained by CMG Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.104
 
 
          Page 1 of 12




---



##### 



Page 2 of 12




---



##### 



Page 3 of 12




---



##### 



Page 4 of 12




---



##### 



Page 5 of 12




---



##### 



Page 6 of 12




---



##### 



Page 7 of 12




---



##### 



Page 8 of 12




---



##### 



Page 9 of 12




---



##### 



Page 10 of 12




---



##### 



Page 11 of 12




---



##### 



VYSIS, INC.
    
    GEN-PROBE INCORPORATEDBy: /s/ [signature illegible]
    
    By: /s/ Henry L. NordhoffTitle: President & CEO
    
    Title: President & Chief Exec. OfficerDate: 8/10/99
    
    Date: August 10, 1999
 Page 12 of 12




---



##### 



Country
    
    
    Applcn. No.
    
    
    Status/Pat. No.European
    
    
    87309308.2
    
    
    
    0265244France
    
    
    87309308.2
    
    
    
    0265244Germany
    
    
    87309308.2
    
    
    
    P3781860.0Italy
    
    
    87309308.2
    
    
    
    0265244United Kingdom
    
    
    87309308.2
    
    
    
    0265244Japan
    
    
    268030/87
    
    
    
    PendingJapan
    
    
    104339/99
    
    
    
    PendingUSA
    
    
    08/236,877
    
    
    
    5,780,224
  Country
    
    
    Applcn. No.
    
    
    Status/Pat. No.European
    
    
    88312135.2
    
    
    
    0328829France
    
    
    88312135.2
    
    
    
    0328829Germany
    
    
    88312135.2
    
    
    
    P3854470.9Italy
    
    
    88312135.2
    
    
    
    0328829United Kingdom
    
    
    88312135.2
    
    
    
    0328829Japan
    
    
    323183/88
    
    
    
    2817926USA
    
    
    08/238,080
    
    
    
    5,750,338
 
 *
    
    Abandoned Applications/Patents Are Not Identified 1 of 2




---



##### 



Country
    
    Applcn. No.
    
    
    Status/Pat. No.USA
    
    08/622,491
    
    
    5,714,380
  Country
    
    
    Applcn. No.
    
    
    Status/Pat. No.European
    
    
    90905780.4
    
    
    
    0481999France
    
    
    90905780.4
    
    
    
    0481999Germany
    
    
    90905780.4
    
    
    
    69031121.4Italy
    
    
    90905780.4
    
    
    
    0481999United Kingdom
    
    
    90905780.4
    
    
    
    0481999Japan
    
    
    505451/90
    
    
    
    PendingUSA
    
    
    07/976,678
    
    
    
    5,457,025
 2 of 2
No. 12-6308.

#### Williams *v.*Louisiana.

Ct. App. La., 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Saturday, January 24, 1998: 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. 10:30 a.m. to 
11:00 a.m. (public comment session).

ADDRESSES: San Ildefonso Pueblo, Tewa Center, State Route 4.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann DuBois, Los Alamos National 
Laboratory Citizens' Advisory Board, 528 35th Street, Los Alamos, NM 
87544, (505) 665-5048.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

9:00 a.m.
    Call to Order
    Adoption of Bylaws
    Election of Officers
9:30 a.m.  Old Business
10:00 a.m.  New Business
10:30 a.m.  Public Comment Session
12:00 p.m.  Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Ms. Ann DuBois, at (505) 665-5048. Requests 
must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision 
will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The Designated 
Federal Official is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that 
will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. This notice is being 
published less than 15 days in advance of the meeting due to 
programmatic issues that needed to be resolved.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Joe Vozella, 
Department of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los 
Alamos, NM 87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 12, 1998.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 98-1125 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24171-24172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Application Tendered for Filing with the Commission

April 27, 1998.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Major Water Power Project, 5 Megawatts or 
Less.
    b. Project No.: P-2964-006.
    c. Date Filed: March 31, 1998.
    d. Applicant: City of Sturgis, Michigan.
    e. Name of Project: Sturgis Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the St. Joseph River in St. Joseph County, near 
Centreville, Michigan.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact:

Mr. John J. Griffith, P.E., Electric Department Superintendent, City of 
Sturgis, 130 North Nottawa, Sturgis, MI 49091
Mr. John E. Fisher, P.E., Chairman, Lawson-Fisher Associates P.C., 525 
West Washington Ave., South Bend, Indiana 46601

    i. FERC Contact: Patrick K. Murphy (202) 219-2659.
    j. Comment Date: 60 days from the date of this notice.
    k. Description of Project: The existing run-of-river project 
consists of: (1) An 800-foot-long dam, comprised of a 300-foot-long 
spillway and an 500-foot-long earthern portion; (2) two powerhouses 
(old & new); and (3) an 18-mile-long 14.4/24.9 KV WYE transmission 
line. The old powerhouse houses two turbine-generator units (each 550 
kilowatts (KW)); the new powerhouse houses two units (each 750 KW) 
totaling 1,300-kw generating capacity. The Sturgis Project reservoir 
has a surface area of 580 acres and a storage volume of approximately 
6,550 acre-feet at 825 feet surface elevation. There is no new 
construction proposed for power purposes.
    l. With this notice, we are initiating consultation with the 
MICHIGAN STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO), as required by 
Sec. 106, National Historic Preservation Act, and the regulations of 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 36 CFR at 800.4.
    m. Pursuant to Section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's 
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes 
that an additional

[[Page 24172]]

scientific study should be conducted in order to form an adequate 
factual basis for a complete analysis of the application on its merit, 
the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person must file a request for a 
study with the Commission not later than 60 days from the date of this 
notice and serve a copy of the request on the applicant.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-11572 Filed 4-30-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Phillip Maurice SEYMORE, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O Arika Renay RICHARD, Appellee.

Case No. 5D16-3367

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 13, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volu-sia County, Karen Foxman, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Glenn A. Kleinert, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 9, 2004







/s/ Glenn. A. Kleinert

Glenn A. Kleinert

President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Montana Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Montana Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 358,128
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 368,321 | 408,507 | 478,815 | 530,201 | 551,660 | 569,852 | 590,475 | 587,923 | 572,643 | 806,377
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 831,482 | 806,534 | 825,205 | 830,437 | 823,702 | 788,048 | 759,932 | 790,384 | 718,224 | 570,882
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 778,526 | 844,794 | 786,720 | 755,917 | 627,923 | 584,785 | 600,049 | 554,722 | 459,277 | 378,961
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 257,801 | 266,101 | 288,386 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
323P16

#### Danielle Star Maldonado-Reynolds v. Frank L. Perry, Secretary, N.C. Department of Public Safety

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Mandamus*

Dismissed 09/01/2016
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Atlas Energy, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the
General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                           
|Sean P. McGrath                               
|Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
|February 28, 2012