alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019267EN.01000302.xml

| 9.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9365 — EPPL/APG/KRC/citizenM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 267/06)

On 14 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9365. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9365. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
No. 12-6366.

#### Hoffert *v.*Ryan, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 92 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 14, 2011 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 

correct the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540, 

3 the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall strike sub4 section (b) of section 310 of title 37, United States Code, 

5 as inserted by section 616(a)(2) of the bill, and insert the 

6 following: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 92 RDS 

1 ‘‘(b) SPECIAL PAY AMOUNT.—(1) Except as provided 

2 in paragraph (2), the amount of special pay authorized 

3 by subsection (a) for qualifying service during a day or 

4 portion of a day shall be the amount equal to 1/30th of 

5 the maximum monthly amount of special pay payable to 

6 a member as specified in paragraph (3). 

7 ‘‘(2) In the case of a member who is exposed to hos8 tile fire or a hostile mine explosion event in or for a day 

9 or portion of a day, the Secretary concerned may, at the 

10 election of the Secretary, pay the member special pay 

11 under subsection (a) for such service in an amount not 

12 to exceed the maximum monthly amount of special pay 

13 payable to a member as specified in paragraph (3). 

14 ‘‘(3) The maximum monthly amount of special pay 

15 payable to a member under this subsection for any month 

16 is $225.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20654-20655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11033]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-34,056, TA-W-34,056B]


Crown Pacific Gilchrist, OR, Crescent Creek Logging Gilchrist, 
OR; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 10, 1998, applicable 
to all workers of Crown Pacific, Gilchrist, Oregon. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on March 6, 1998 (63 FR 12831).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred at Crescent Creek Logging, Gilchrist, 
Oregon when it closed February 26, 1998. The workers provided logging 
services to support the production of lumber at Crown Pacific. 
Accordingly, the Department is

[[Page 20655]]

amending the certification to cover workers at Crescent Creek Logging, 
Gilchrist, Oregon.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Crown Pacific adversely affected by increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-34,056 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Crown Pacific, Gilchrist, Oregon (TA-W-34,056), 
and Crescent Creek Logging, Gilchrist, Oregon (TA-W-34,056B) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
November 18, 1996 through February 10, 2000 are eligible to apply 
for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 
1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of April, 1998.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 98-11033 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
No. 12-6127.

#### Garcia *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0215

_________________

CITY OF MISSOULA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JOHN RAY ADAMS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert L. Deschamps, III, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2021

10/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0215
No. 12-96.

#### Shelby County, Alabama *v.*Holder, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “Whether Congress’ decision in 2006 to reauthorize §5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of § 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the Constitution.”
# C_2019156EN.01000202.xml

| 7.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9310 — PFR/IFM/PSA/DCT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 156/04)

On 26 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9310. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9310. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)             
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History: Annual                                       
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|U.S. Imputed Value of Natural Gas Market Production  (Cost)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|U.S. Imputed Value of Natural Gas Market Production  (Cost)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0     | Year-1     | Year-2     | Year-3     | Year-4      | Year-5      | Year-6      | Year-7     | Year-8     | Year-9    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | ----------- | ---------- | ---------- | ----------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |            |            |            |            |             |             |             |            |            | 30,524,691
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 31,754,803 | 30,327,779 | 32,570,827 | 38,810,612 | 36,535,940  | 30,285,862  | 42,951,353  | 46,131,323 | 39,085,318 | 43,324,690
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 74,338,958 | 82,202,805 | 58,596,868 | 97,555,375 | 106,521,974 | 138,750,746 | 124,074,399 |            |            |           
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                               
|View History:                                                                
|                                                                             
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             
|                                                                             
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Exports  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        | 3.92   | 2.35   | 2.35   | 2.14   | 2.05  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.31   | 1.79   | 1.88   | 2.08   | 2.08   | 1.64   | 2.45   | 2.49   | 2.13   | 2.30  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.02   | 4.14   | 3.32   | 5.66   | 6.18   | 7.77   | 6.90   | 6.96   | 8.62   | 4.34  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.75   | 4.35   | 3.08   | 4.06   | 5.40   | 2.95   | 2.63   | 3.20   | 3.34   | 2.64  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.10   | 4.94   | 6.34   | 2.54   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
295P16

#### State v. Christopher Shawn Frione

Def’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-1143)

Denied
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:43 PM

To: 'doud.jonathan@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: Jonathan Doud (FAA-2015-0686)

May 18, 2015 

Dear Mr. Doud: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0686). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 1, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
# C_2019241EN.01000701.xml

| 17.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/7

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
  )

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 241/07)

Decisions granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation numbers | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2019) 5096 | 10 July 2019 | Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether (diglyme)
  EC No: 203-924-4
  CAS No 111-96-6 | PMC ISOCHEM
  32 rue Lavoisier, 91710, Vert Le Petit, France | REACH/19/21/0 | Use as a process solvent in one step of manufacturing of an active pharmaceutical ingredient used in an anti-protozoal drug | 22 August 2024 | Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
  There are no suitable alternatives. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation numbers

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2019) 5096

10 July 2019

Bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether (diglyme)

EC No: 203-924-4

CAS No 111-96-6

PMC ISOCHEM

32 rue Lavoisier, 91710, Vert Le Petit, France

REACH/19/21/0

Use as a process solvent in one step of manufacturing of an active pharmaceutical ingredient used in an anti-protozoal drug

22 August 2024

Risk is adequately controlled in accordance with Article 60(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.

There are no suitable alternatives.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11129]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-2]


Amendment to Class D and Class E Airspace; Cape Girardeau, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of direct final rule 
which revises Class D and Class E airspace at Cape Girardeau, MO.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 63 FR 8095 is effective on 
0901 UTC, June 18, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on February 18, 
1998 (63 FR 8095). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on June 18, 1998. No adverse comments 
were received, and thus this document confirms that this direct final 
rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on March 31, 1998.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 98-11129 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 95 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 

2012, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (Public 

4 Law 112–36) is further amended by striking the date 
2 

•HJ 95 EH 

1 specified in section 106(3) and inserting ‘‘December 23, 

2 2011’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 16, 

2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 95 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal 

year 2012, and for other purposes.
#### L.S.H., II v. P.J.B.-C.

373 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

2007-11143

(Delaware)

Vacated/Remanded
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Capital Solutions 1, Inc. pursuant to Section of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher Astrom, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Capital Solutions 1, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: October 15, 2005

/s/ CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
---------------------------
Christopher Astrom
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer