alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Autwmiw ii. TEXAN 

WILL WIJBON 

A-l-rORNEY G~NERAX. May 10, 1957 

Honorable 0. B. Ellis 

Q@neral Manager 

Texas Prison Systerfi 

Huntsville, Texas Opinion No. WW-120 

Re: Whether or not Humble Oil 

ar.d Refining Company has 

authority or right to lay 

additional lines acrosa the 

easement granted by two easement deeds: 1, dated April 7, 

1928, recorded in Vol.743, 

page 526, Deed Records of 

Harris County, Texas, and 2, 

dated April 7, 1928, recorded 

In Vol. 119, page 372, Deed 

Records of Fort Bend County, 

Texas o 

Dear Sir: 

Your request for ol;:r oNr:fon dated April 24, 1957, 

presented the fo?lowing qiiestion: 

srA question has developed as to the 

legality and vagueness of two easernext deeds 

to .the Hunibie Gil and Refining Corr,pany. The 

deeds were dated Apri; '7, :?928, recorded in 

Vol 0 ~$3~ on page 526 in the records of Harris 

County, and dated Aprli~ 7, ig28, recorded in 

Vol o 119 on page 372 in the Records of Port 

Bend County. 

"We respectfully reques,t an official 

opinion from you as .to whether the Humble 

011 and Refining Company has au'thori,ty or 

the 1-i ht 

grant. 6 to lay additfonal lines on thfs 

The deeds to which you refer were executed In 1928 

by the Texas Prison Board signed 'by R. H, Baker as Chairman, 
Hmorable 0. B. Ellis, ‘page 2 (W-120) 

with the Humble Pipeline Company being named as grantee. They 

provide for the laying of one pipe line across certain prison 

lands, with an option to iay additional lines alongside the 

first ‘upon the payment, by ,the grantee, of like consideration 

for each pipe line so laid, 

The Legisia,cu,re in Ac,ts,1943, 48th. Leg.,’ p. 281, 

ch. 177, Sections 1 and 2, amended Article 6203d, V.C.S., to 

provide, for ,the firs t tirre, authority for the Texas Prison 

Board, by and with the -onsent of the Governor and the Attorney Generai of Texas, to make easement grants for pipelines 

crossing prison lands. This Act, however, does not purport 

to be retrospecti.ve in operation and,therefore, cannot be’ 

considered as aiding GT^ valida,ting ,the grant fn question. 

Even If the Hurribie Pipeline Company had the right 

to cross all public l~ands 'by ,vir,tue of the holding In Hu.mble 

;‘;eiine Co. v. State, 2 S.W,2d 1~0~8 (Civ.App,,l928, writ 

the ‘Texas l?isor: Board nad no a,uthorlty to execute the 

SubjeEt gra:nts and s:;eh grants were not effective for any purpose 0 

It is well s&t;ied in ,tnis State that persons dealing with officials of ,&hi;; state a’re charged with notice Of 

exterit of auk‘no-lYt,y si:,h ofiir.ia:s ha:re, and may not hold the 

Sta,te liab:s 03 cori,t.: r:~ cts made ~d.~Cho~.~~t ail,thority ,, State v. 

Bagland Clinis-‘Hosui”s--, :,x8 TerO 393: ,159 S.W.2d 105; Nichols 

v. State , , 9 1:. c. A, 327,. 32 s.W. ti,52. 
BY 

Assls~:w,t
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 50

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and 
 prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in 
                     competition with its citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2011

Mr. Paul introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
  relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and 
 prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in 
                     competition with its citizens.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The Government of the United States shall not engage 
in any business, professional, commercial, financial, or industrial 
enterprise except as specified in the Constitution.
    ``Section 2. The constitution or laws of any State, or the laws of 
the United States, shall not be subject to the terms of any foreign or 
domestic agreement which would abrogate this amendment.
    ``Section 3. The activities of the United States Government which 
violate the intent and purposes of this amendment shall, within a 
period of three years from the date of the ratification of this 
amendment, be liquidated and the properties and facilities affected 
shall be sold.
    ``Section 4. Three years after the ratification of this amendment 
the sixteenth article of amendments to the Constitution of the United 
States shall stand repealed and thereafter Congress shall not levy 
taxes on personal incomes, estates, and gifts.''.
                                 <all>
```
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019181EN.01001001.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 27.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/10 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9373 — PAI Partners/Areas Worldwide)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 181/06)

1.

On 17 May 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019181EN.01001001-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | PAI Europe VII funds (Luxembourg), belonging to the group of PAI Partners SAS (‘PAI Partners’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Areas Worldwide (France). |

PAI Partners acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Areas Worldwide.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—   for PAI Partners: a private equity company that manages and advises a number of funds that own companies active in a variety of business sectors, such as business services, food and consumer, general industries, healthcare, and retail and distribution,

—   for Areas Worldwide: management of travel concession catering, mainly in motorways, airports and railway stations.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019181EN.01001001-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9373 — PAI Partners/Areas Worldwide

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| |
| --- |
| Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| Fax +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019181EN.01001001-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019181EN.01001001-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                     
|View History:                                                      
|                                                                   
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Qatar  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   
|                                                                   
|U.S. Liquefied Natural Gas Imports From Qatar  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                   

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 19,697
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 46,057 | 22,758 | 35,081 | 13,623 | 11,854 | 2,986  | 0      | 18,352 | 3,108  | 12,687
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 45,583 | 90,972 | 33,823 | 7,320  | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Jonathan WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-1916

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed July 10, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Oregon  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Natural Gas Citygate Price in Oregon  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 4.06   | 3.70   | 3.13   | 2.49   | 3.01   | 2.67  
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2.47   | 2.39   | 2.34   | 2.48   | 2.73   | 2.42   | 2.42   | 2.58   | 2.73   | 2.93  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 3.87   | 5.04   | 5.25   | 5.19   | 5.86   | 7.12   | 8.10   | 8.14   | 8.82   | 7.79  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.78   | 5.84   | 5.21   | 4.82   | 5.40   | 4.65   | 4.15   | 3.90   | 3.87   | 3.56  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.58   | 4.30   | 5.51   | 5.62   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
# C_2019055EN.01001801.xml

| 12.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/18

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9275 — Intermediate Capital Group/Grupo Konectanet/Konecta Activos Inmobiliarios)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 55/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Intermediate Capital Group, plc. (‘ICG’, United Kingdom), |
| --- | --- |

—

Intermediate Capital Group, plc. (‘ICG’, United Kingdom),

| — | Grupo Konectanet (Spain) and Konecta Activos Inmobiliarios (Spain) (together, ‘Konecta Group’). |
| --- | --- |

—

Grupo Konectanet (Spain) and Konecta Activos Inmobiliarios (Spain) (together, ‘Konecta Group’).

ICG acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control over the whole of Konecta Group.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | ICG is an investment firm active in the structuring and provision of mezzanine finance, leveraged credit and minority equity, managing assets from third party investors and its balance sheet with investment portfolios in Europe, Asia Pacific and the US, |
| --- | --- |

—

ICG is an investment firm active in the structuring and provision of mezzanine finance, leveraged credit and minority equity, managing assets from third party investors and its balance sheet with investment portfolios in Europe, Asia Pacific and the US,

| — | Konecta Group is active globally in the provision of business process outsourcing and contact centre services to telecommunications, utilities, banking, insurance, public administration or transport companies. |
| --- | --- |

—

Konecta Group is active globally in the provision of business process outsourcing and contact centre services to telecommunications, utilities, banking, insurance, public administration or transport companies.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9275 — Intermediate Capital Group/Grupo Konectanet/Konecta Activos Inmobiliarios

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

| E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu |
| --- |
| Fax: +32 22964301 |
| Postal address: |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax: +32 22964301

Postal address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 55 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 55

Disapproving of the participation of the United States in the provision 
  by the International Monetary Fund of a multibillion dollar funding 
package for the European Union, until the member states of the European 
   Union comply with the economic requirements of membership in the 
                            European Union.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2011

 Mrs. McMorris Rodgers submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Disapproving of the participation of the United States in the provision 
  by the International Monetary Fund of a multibillion dollar funding 
package for the European Union, until the member states of the European 
   Union comply with the economic requirements of membership in the 
                            European Union.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress disapproves of the participation of the United States 
in the provision by the International Monetary Fund of a multibillion 
dollar funding package to the European Union, until each member state 
of the European Union demonstrate compliance with the economic 
requirements of membership in the European Union, including limiting 
the deficit of the member state to 3 percent of the gross domestic 
product of the member state and limiting the total public debt of the 
member state to 60 percent of the gross domestic product of the member 
state.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019005EN.01000101.xml

| 8.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9177 — Sumitomo/Metal One/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 5/01)

On 17 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9177. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9177. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
# C_2019425EN.01000501.xml

| 18.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/5

---

Special Report No 25/2019

‘Data quality in budget support: weaknesses in some indicators and in the verification of the payment for variable tranches’

(2019/C 425/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 25/2019 ‘Data quality in budget support: weaknesses in some indicators and in the verification of the payment for variable tranches’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

---
No. 12-6462.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.