alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1209-DR]


Georgia; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Georgia, (FEMA-1209-DR), dated March 11, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 16, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Georgia, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 11, 1998:

    Houston County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-10944 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### State v. Lowery

111,329

07/22/2015

Denied

Unpublished
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 46 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National Peace Officers’ 

Memorial Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself and Ms. NORTON) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of the Capitol Grounds for the National 

Peace Officers’ Memorial Service. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF THE CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR NA4 TIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL SERV5 ICE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Grand Lodge of the Fra7 ternal Order of Police and its auxiliary (in this resolution 

8 referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall be permitted to sponsor 

9 a public event, the 30th Annual National Peace Officers’ 

10 Memorial Service (in this resolution referred to as the 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 46 IH 

1 ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds, in order to honor the 

2 law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty dur3 ing 2010. 

4 (b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on 

5 May 15, 2011, or on such other date as the Speaker of 

6 the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules 

7 and Administration of the Senate jointly designate. 

8 SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed 

10 by the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police 

11 Board, the event shall be— 

12 (1) free of admission charge and open to the 

13 public; and 

14 (2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of 

15 Congress. 

16 (b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall 

17 assume full responsibility for all expenses and liabilities 

18 incident to all activities associated with the event. 

19 SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

20 Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Cap21 itol, the sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol 

22 Grounds such stage, sound amplification devices, and 

23 other related structures and equipment, as may be re24 quired for the event. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 46 IH 

1 SEC. 4. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

2 The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforce3 ment of the restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of 

4 title 40, United States Code, concerning sales, advertise5 ments, displays, and solicitations on the Capitol Grounds, 

6 as well as other restrictions applicable to the Capitol 

7 Grounds, in connection with the event. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018186EN.01000201.xml

| 31.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/2

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

(2018/C 186/02)

Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (1) are hereby amended as follows:

1

1

On page 381:

On page 381:

| 9503 00 | Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls' carriages; dolls; other toys; reduced-size (‘scale’) models and similar recreational models, working or not; puzzles of all kinds |
| --- | --- |

9503 00

9503 00

Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls' carriages; dolls; other toys; reduced-size (‘scale’) models and similar recreational models, working or not; puzzles of all kinds

Tricycles, scooters, pedal cars and similar wheeled toys; dolls' carriages; dolls; other toys; reduced-size (‘scale’) models and similar recreational models, working or not; puzzles of all kinds

The following text is inserted as first and second paragraph:

The following text is inserted as first and second paragraph:

‘To distinguish between toys representing human beings and toys representing animals or non-human creatures, no account shall be taken of:

| — | their colour (for example, a purple or green skin colour does not give them the character of a non-human creature), and |
| --- | --- |

—

their colour (for example, a purple or green skin colour does not give them the character of a non-human creature), and

| — | the background of the characters represented by them or their skills and abilities (for example, their place of birth or their ability to fly). |
| --- | --- |

—

the background of the characters represented by them or their skills and abilities (for example, their place of birth or their ability to fly).

Where a toy is wearing a mask (whether or not with, for example, animal ears) leaving large or recognisable parts of the human face visible or identifiable, or if the mask can be removed and reveals humanoid features, it is to be seen as a toy representing a human being.’

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

1

(1)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.

1

---
|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                   
|View History:                                                                    
|                                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 
|                                                                                 
|Colorado Natural Gas Deliveries to Electric Power Consumers  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                 

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |        |        |        | 26,802  | 32,640  | 40,879 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 63,253  | 85,954  | 78,171  | 77,895  | 83,369 | 92,629 | 92,927 | 123,788 | 106,454 | 115,234
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 92,657  | 85,015  | 86,309  | 89,508  | 96,589 | 92,304 | 96,923 | 97,536  | 125,894 | 130,775
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 140,222 | 116,288 | 127,017 | 133,188 |        |        |        |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-926-08-1420-00]


Montana: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plat of survey of the following described land is 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Montana State Office, Billings, 
Montana, thirty (30) days from the date of this publication.

Meridian, South Dakota

T. 6 S., R. 9 E.

    The plat, representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
north boundary and subdivisional lines, and the adjusted original 
meanders of the left bank of the South Fork of the Cheyenne River in 
section 4, and the subdivision of section 4, and the survey of the new 
meanders of a portion of the present left bank of the South Fork of the 
Cheyenne River in section 4, Township 6 South, Range 9 East, Black 
Hills Meridian, South Dakota, was accepted December 18, 1997.
    This survey was executed at the request of the U.S. Forest Service, 
Custer National Forest, and was necessary to identify lands 
administered by the U.S. Forest Service.
    A copy of the preceding described plat will be immediately placed 
in the open files and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information.
    If a protest against this survey, as shown on this plat, is 
received prior to the date of the official filing, the filing will be 
stayed pending consideration of the protest. This particular plat will 
not be officially filed until the day after all protests have been 
accepted or dismissed and become final or appeals from the dismissal 
affirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 222 North 
32nd Street, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800.

    Dated: January 8, 1998.
Daniel T. Mates,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 98-1128 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20437-20440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10903]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

Office of Defense Trade Controls
[Public Notice No. 2788]


Notifications to the Congress of Proposed Commercial Export 
Licenses

AGENCY: Office of Defense Trade Controls, Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Department of State has 
forwarded the attached Notifications of Proposed Export Licenses to the 
Congress on the dates shown on the attachments pursuant to section 
36(c) and in compliance with section 36(e) of the Arms Export Control 
Act (22 U.S.C. 2776).

EFFECTIVE DATE: As shown on each of the two letters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. William J. Lowell, Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls, 
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Department of State {(703) 875-
6644}.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 38(e) of the Arms Export Control Act 
mandates that notifications to the

[[Page 20438]]

Congress pursuant to section 36(c) must be published in the Federal 
Register when they are transmitted to Congress or as soon thereafter as 
practicable.

    Dated: April 9, 1998.
William J. Lowell,
Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls.

BILLING CODE 4710-25-M

[[Page 20439]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24AP98.003



[[Page 20440]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24AP98.004



[FR Doc. 98-10903 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-C
Exhibit 12.1 

**CERTIFICATE**

I, JORGE HORACIO BRITO,CERTIFY THAT: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Macro S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting,or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 28, 2016
|                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History: Annual                                                          
|View History:                                                                 
|                                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                              
|                                                                              
|Texas Natural Gas Number of Gas and Gas Condensate Wells  (Number of Elements)
|                                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 48,609 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 50,867  | 47,615  | 46,298  | 47,101  | 48,654  | 54,635  | 53,816  | 56,747  | 58,736  | 58,712 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 60,577  | 63,704  | 65,779  | 68,572  | 72,237  | 74,827  | 74,265  | 76,436  | 87,556  | 93,507 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 95,014  | 139,368 | 140,087 | 140,964 | 142,292 | 135,560 | 134,958 | 130,033 | 123,928 | 120,576
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 118,957 |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Willis and Overton 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

TERRY S. BARKSDALE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 1074-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JUNE 11, 1996 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK 

 John E. Clarkson, Judge 

 Timothy P. Sceviour (Abrons, Fasanaro & 

Sceviour, on brief), for appellant. 

 Marla Graff Decker, Assistant Attorney 

General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney 

General, on brief), for appellee. 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 

 Terry S. Barksdale was convicted by a jury of attempted 

robbery in violation of Code § 18.2-58, use of a firearm in the 

commission of a felony in violation of Code § 18.2-53.1, and 

unlawful wounding in violation of Code § 18.2-51. He argues on 

appeal that the evidence is insufficient to support the 

convictions. 

 Upon review of the record, construing the evidence in the 

light most favorable to the Commonwealth and granting to it all 

reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom, we cannot say 

that the decision below was plainly wrong or unsupported by the 

evidence. 

 Accordingly, the convictions are affirmed. 
- 2 - 

 Affirmed.
NOTE: This disposit ion is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-3257

CONSTANCE R. SPEED,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Intervenor.

Kenneth M. Plaisance , of New Orleans, Louisiana, argued for petitioner.

Calvin M. Morrow , Attorney, Office of the G eneral Counsel, Merit Systems

Protection Board, of Washi ngton, DC, argued for responden t. With him on the brief

were B. Chad Bungard , General Counsel; and Rosa M. Koppel , Deputy General

Counsel.

Allison Kidd-Miller , Trial Attorney, Commercial Liti gation Branch, Civil Division,

United States Department of Ju stice, of Washington, DC, fo r intervenor. With her on

the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director; and Todd M. Hughes , Deputy Director.

Appealed from: Merit S ystems Protection BoardNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-3257

CONSTANCE R. SPEED,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent,

and

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Intervenor.



# Judgment

ON APPEAL from the Merit Systems Protection Board

in CASE NO(S). DA0353060594-I-1

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge , LINN, Circuit Judge , and Zagel *

, District Judge ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED June 6, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

* Honorable James B. Zagel, District Judge, United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinoi s, sitting by designation.