alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                    
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Withdraw   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|U.S. Natural Gas Salt Underground Storage Activity-Withdraw   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         | 122,867 | 199,604 | 245,846 | 273,676 | 275,329 | 259,083
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 320,115 | 293,594 | 363,261 | 330,991 | 363,508 | 344,730 | 351,821 | 420,245 | 398,217 | 403,321
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 452,396 | 440,480 | 445,477 | 520,856 | 552,155 | 550,191 | 624,467 | 751,685 | 807,694 | 815,252
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 700,675 | 792,162 | 882,628 | 741,474 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
# C_2019352EN.01000901.xml

| 18.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9535 — JERA/Macquarie/Swancor/Formosa 2)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 352/09)

On 2 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9535. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9535. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### Walling v. Riggin

112,052

112,053

112,054

112,055

09/14/2015

Denied

Unpublished
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 05/27/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

*

This decision is rendered by a quorum, due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge 

Hatchett on May 14, 1999. U.S.C. § 46(d).

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 97-8592

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 1:95-CV-3147-CAM

FORREST KELLY CLAY,

individually and on behalf of

all those similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION, THOMAS H. JOHNSON,

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(May 27, 1999)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit Judges*

.
2

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, the prior opinion issued on

October 14, 1998, and published at 157 F.3d 1259, is modified, as follows:

We vacate the introductory paragraph and also Part III A. of our prior opinion

in this case, found at 157 F.3d at 1259, 1261, 1263- 68, and adopt in their place the

concurring opinion of Judge Carnes, which is found in 157 F.3d at 1269-71. 

We also vacate Part IV of our prior opinion and substitute in its place this

paragraph: As to the insider trading issue involving Clay’s stock appreciation rights,

we do not decide whether those rights are securities or otherwise trigger the “disclose

or abstain” rule of insider trading, but instead affirm the district court’s judgment

on the ground that Clay lacks standing to bring a claim under § 20A of the Securities

and Exchange Act. As to the securities fraud issue involving Riverwood’s July 1995

press release, we affirm the judgment of the district court because that release did not

require any subsequent disclosure under § 10(b) or Rule 10b-5. 

AFFIRMED.
#### CAPITAL COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Naqid HASAN and CalPal, LLC, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3596

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach *374County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2011-CA-0030S6-XXXX-MB.

Affirmed.
No. 12-126.

#### McQuiggin, Warden *v.*Perkins.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.
# 1093-/? ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-12-01018-CR 

### OFFENSE: OTH FEL Shockley, Stephen Coleman v. The 

## STYLE: state ofTexas COUNTY: Collin COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 366th Judicial District Court DATE: 7/30/2014 Publish: YES TC CASE #: 366-82727-09



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Shockley, Stephen Coleman v. The STYLE: State ofTexas 

## PROSE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

## t&USfh DATE: OtlN' 2017 

# U JUDGE: 

## UA Us 4aAaJ*— CCA#: 

# 1033- W CCADisposition: DATE: 

### JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: 

# PAD Se PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN 

## CCA IS: </<S-*Ot'ec/ JUDGE: 

## PC 

# /=±6, ^<r 3&A4--AELECTRONIC RECORDOFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY



### 2/26/2015 a0 Shockley, Stephen Coleman COA No. 05-12-01018-CR 82727-09 PD-1093-14 

## PursuanttoRule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P^th£free.oMMs'feturnedto thecourtofappeals. 

# ^®^ AbelAcosta, Clerk 5TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK LISA MATZ 

### 600 COMMERCE, 2ND FLOOR DALLAS, TX 75202 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CARA THERAPEUTICS, INC.**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-193905) pertaining to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, asamended, and the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan of Cara Therapeutics Inc., of our report dated March 27, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Cara Therapeutics Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Cara Therapeutics Inc.,for the year ended December 31, 2013. 

/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 27, 2014
#### John VASQUEZ, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-306

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 2, 2017

L.T. No.: 08-4316

Dismissed.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald G. Carlson, President and a director of Golden Aria
Corp., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Golden Aria Corp. for
      the year ended August 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Golden Aria Corp.                                                               

Dated: November 29, 2007

| | /s/
      Chris Bunka        
| | -----------------------------
| | Chris Bunka                  
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Golden Aria Corp.            



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Golden Aria
Corp. and will be retained by Golden Aria Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.4   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company, for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Terry A. HansonTerry A. Hanson
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Date: August 7, 2008
|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                     
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                               
|View History:                                                                                
|                                                                                             
|Florida Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             
|                                                                                             
|Florida Natural Gas Price Sold to Electric Power Consumers  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                             

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.51   | 2.27   | 3.10  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.50   | 4.73   | 4.14   | 5.97   | 6.49   | 8.75   | 8.62   | 9.35   | 10.41  | 7.90  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6.54   | 5.86   | 4.80   | 5.08   | 5.58   | 4.41   | 3.86   | 4.29   | W      | 3.80  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | W      | 5.20   | W      | W      |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
CERTIFICATION
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Arrow-Magnolia International, Inc. ("Arrow"), that, to
his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Arrow on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of Arrow.


Date:  November 22, 2004           	    By: /s/ Mark Kenner
		                            ------------------------------
                                             Mark Kenner, Chairman and Chief
                                             Executive Officer



Date:  November 22, 2004           	     By:  /s/ Fred Kenner
		                             ------------------------------
                                             Fred Kenner, President and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018340EN.01000701.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/7

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 10 July 2018 concerning a draft decision in case AT.40181 — Philips

Rapporteur: Sweden

(2018/C 340/05)

1.

The members of the Advisory Committee agree on the Commission’s assessment that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes a single and continuous infringement of Article 101 TFEU.

2.

The members of the Advisory Committee agree with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1).

3.

The members of the Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal.

---

(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.

1

---
# The Attorney General of Texas

MARK WHITE Attorney General November 12, 1980

Honorable Bill Stubblefield Williamson County Attorney Georgetown, Texas 78626 Opinion No. w-269 Re: Whether conveyance of a strip of land requires vacating of an original plat and replatting under article 974a, V.T.C.S. Dear Mr.Stubblefield: You inquire about the application of article 974a, V.T.C.S:, to the conveyance of a strip of land not effected for the purpose of laying out a subdivision or s&urban lots. Youinfofm usthat the original purchasers of a house and lot in the stidivision discovered that the house bed been inadvertently situated approximately one foot from alot line, inviolation of local setback ordinances. The developer owns the adjacent lot and has offered to convey a strip of land along the lot line wide enough to satisfy setback requirements. This conveyance would leave the unsold lot of adequate size for residential construction. Youask the following questions:

L Isthere a violation of article 974a, V.T.C.S., if the developer conveys the strip ofland by metes and bounds?

m MainPlaza.

suite4w 2. May sn amendment to the plat be filed to San A”10”10. TX~ 78205 reflect the conveyance, and, if so, sbject to what 512,225.4191 procedure? An Eq”al OpPOrf ”“~ly/ A recorded s&division plat may not be amended except in conA,,irmsti”e Action Employer formsnce with section 5 of article 974a, V.T.C.S. Priolo v. City of Dallas,

257 S.W. 2d 947 (Tex. Civ. App.-Dallas 1953,writ reCd n.r.e.); McGraw v. Cit of Dallas, 420 S.W. 2d 793 ‘(Tex. Civ. App. -Dallas 1967, writ rePd iizhmr e v. City of Graham, 287 S.W. 2d 527 (Tex. Civ. App.- Fort Worth 1956, writ rePd n.r.e.). Section 5 of article 974a requires, in cases where lots inas&division have been sold, that a stidivision plat be vacated, in whole or in part, before an amendment such as you propose can become effective. After a vacation, a conveyance by metes and bounds could be made and a new plat could be filed. Under the circumstances that youHonorable Bill Stubblefield - Page Two (MW-269)

describe, avacation ofthe part ofthe plat showing the two affected lots wouldrequire the approval of all ofthe owners oflots inthe subdivision. It would seem that a more practical solution to the problem of the violation of the local setback crdinance would be to apply for a variance to the setback requirement. Ifthe variance wasgranted, there would nolonger be aviolation. SUMMARY Although a land owner may convey a strip ofland by metes and bounds, the plat of the subdivision cannot be amended to reflect that conveyance. It must be vacated and mplatted pursuant to article 974a, V.T.C.S. $f-gg7

Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAYIII Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMD’TEE Susan Garrison, Acting Chairman Ralph Aldave Jon Bible Rick Gilpin Bruce Youngblood

p. 856
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|No chart available.                                     
|No chart available.                                     
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Indiana Natural Gas Repressuring   (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024