alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 92 Received in Senate (RDS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 92

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 2011

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to correct the 
                   enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1540, the Clerk of the House 
of Representatives shall strike subsection (b) of section 310 of title 
37, United States Code, as inserted by section 616(a)(2) of the bill, 
and insert the following:
    ``(b) Special Pay Amount.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
the amount of special pay authorized by subsection (a) for qualifying 
service during a day or portion of a day shall be the amount equal to 
1/30th of the maximum monthly amount of special pay payable to a member 
as specified in paragraph (3).
    ``(2) In the case of a member who is exposed to hostile fire or a 
hostile mine explosion event in or for a day or portion of a day, the 
Secretary concerned may, at the election of the Secretary, pay the 
member special pay under subsection (a) for such service in an amount 
not to exceed the maximum monthly amount of special pay payable to a 
member as specified in paragraph (3).
    ``(3) The maximum monthly amount of special pay payable to a member 
under this subsection for any month is $225.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                      
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History: Annual                                                
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Alabama--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Alabama--onshore Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 222,009 | 228,298 | 229,483 | 223,527 | 221,233 | 220,674 | 212,470 | 207,863
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 200,255 | 191,119 | 184,500 | 176,571 | 173,106 | 164,304 | 160,381 | 155,167 | 152,051 | 146,751
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 139,215 | 134,305 | 128,312 | 120,666 | 110,232 | 104,062 | 99,806  | 89,107  | 82,412  | 75,722 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 68,731  | 61,732  | 54,554  |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 6/28/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 7/31/2024
345P16

#### State v. Dwayne Demont Haizlip

1. Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP16-6I6)

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Proceed *In Forma Pauperis*

3. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Denied 09/19/2016

2. Allowed 09/19/2016

3. Dismissed as moot 09/19/2016

Ervin, J., recused
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 21

 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
relating to ``Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
  Revisions to the New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan 
                 (SIP); Flexible Permits; Final Rule''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 2011

    Mr. Carter introduced the following joint resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Disapproving a rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency 
relating to ``Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
  Revisions to the New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan 
                 (SIP); Flexible Permits; Final Rule''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to 
``Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions 
to the New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP); 
Flexible Permits; Final Rule'' (published at 75 Federal Register 41312 
(July 15, 2010)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2019409EN.01004901.xml

| 5.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 409/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 409/49

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9540 — Permira/Cambrex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 409/03)

On 27 November 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9540. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9540. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                           
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History: Annual                                                     
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Texas--onshore Natural Gas Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 180,003 | 184,258 | 196,463 | 200,233 | 238,897 | 263,397 | 296,412 | 282,462
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 270,436 | 247,750 | 279,912 | 286,253 | 355,165 | 388,305 | 409,276 | 254,337 | 241,626 | 240,533
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 279,981 | 284,557 | 183,118 | 166,328 | 143,891 | 262,174 | 250,813 | 204,334 | 209,855 | 223,975
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 182,627 | 216,264 | 210,822 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 4 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 4

Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
   the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. 
                                 Valeo.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

  Ms. Kaptur submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
   the First Amendment to the Constitution in the case of Buckley v. 
                                 Valeo.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court misinterpreted 
the First Amendment to the Constitution in its decision in the 1976 
case of Buckley v. Valeo because--
            (1) the decision failed to recognize that the unlimited 
        spending of large amounts of money on elections has a corrosive 
        effect on the electoral process not simply because of direct 
        transactions between those who give large amounts of money and 
        candidates and elected officials but because the presence of 
        unlimited amounts of money corrupts the process on a more 
        fundamental level; and
            (2) the decision failed to recognize other legitimate state 
        interests which justify limiting money in campaigns, including 
        the need to preserve the integrity of our republican form of 
        government, restore public confidence in government, and ensure 
        all citizens a more equal opportunity to participate in the 
        political process.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23788-23789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than May 14, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Republic Bancshares, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida; to acquire 
Bankers Savings Bank, FSB, Coral Gables, Florida, and thereby engage in 
operating a savings association, pursuant to Sec. 

[[Page 23789]]

225.28(b)(4)(ii) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 24, 
1998.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 98-11484 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 27 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE OF STATUE OF GERALD R. FORD FROM THE PEOPLE OF 
              MICHIGAN FOR PLACEMENT IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL.

    (a) In General.--The statue of Gerald R. Ford furnished by the 
people of Michigan for placement in the

              

 United States Capitol in accordance with section 1814 of the Revised 
Statutes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 2131), is accepted in the name 
of the United States, and the thanks of the Congress are tendered to 
the people of Michigan for providing this commemoration of one of 
Michigan's most eminent persons.
    (b) Presentation Ceremony.--The State of Michigan is authorized to 
use the Rotunda of the Capitol on May 3, 2011, for a presentation 
ceremony for the statue accepted under this section. The Architect of 
the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board shall take such action as may 
be necessary with respect to physical preparations and security for the 
ceremony.
    (c) Display in Rotunda.--The Architect of the Capitol shall provide 
for the display of the statue accepted under this section in the 
Rotunda of the Capitol, in accordance with the procedures described in 
section 311(e) of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 
U.S.C. 2132(e)).

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 27

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

  Providing for the acceptance of a statue of Gerald R. Ford from the 
     people of Michigan for placement in the United States Capitol.
```
# C_2019361EN.01001001.xml

| 25.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/10

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9570 — Bridgepoint/Latour/Primonial)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 361/09)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | Bridgepoint SAS (‘Bridgepoint’, France), controlled by Atlantic Investments Holdings Limited (UK), the parent holding company of the Bridgepoint group, |
| --- | --- |

—

Bridgepoint SAS (‘Bridgepoint’, France), controlled by Atlantic Investments Holdings Limited (UK), the parent holding company of the Bridgepoint group,

| — | Latour Capital Management SAS (‘Latour’, France) controlled jointly by Mr Philippe Leoni and Mr Cédric Bannel, |
| --- | --- |

—

Latour Capital Management SAS (‘Latour’, France) controlled jointly by Mr Philippe Leoni and Mr Cédric Bannel,

| — | New Primonial Holding SAS (‘Primonial’, France) currently controlled by Bridgepoint. |
| --- | --- |

—

New Primonial Holding SAS (‘Primonial’, France) currently controlled by Bridgepoint.

Bridgepoint and Latour acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Primonial.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | Bridgepoint is an independent private equity company, |
| --- | --- |

—

Bridgepoint is an independent private equity company,

| — | Latour is an independent private equity company, |
| --- | --- |

—

Latour is an independent private equity company,

| — | Primonial operates in France providing selection, design, management and advisory services in the field of investment solutions. |
| --- | --- |

—

Primonial operates in France providing selection, design, management and advisory services in the field of investment solutions.

3.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9570 — Bridgepoint/Latour/Primonial

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

E-mail: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Availability of Funds for the National Health Service Corps Loan 
Repayment Program

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, PHS, HHS.

ACTION: Extension of deadline date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) 
published a document in the Federal Register of March 28, 1997, 
concerning availability of funds for the National Health Service Corps 
(NHSC) Loan Repayment Program (LRP). The deadline date needs to be 
extended.
    In the Federal Register issue of Friday, March 28, 1997, in FR Doc. 
97-7838, on page 14925, in the second column, correct the ``Dates'' 
caption to read:

DATES: The deadline for applications is August 31, 1997, or until all 
appropriated funds have been obligated, whichever occurs first. Due to 
limited funding, it is anticipated that all appropriated funds will be 
obligated prior to August 31, 1997. The volume of applications is 
historically three times greater than the number of contracts that can 
be awarded. Therefore, to receive consideration for funding, health 
professionals must submit an application and proof of a job offer at an 
approved NHSC LRP Service Site.

    Dated: April 9, 1997.
Claude Earl Fox,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-9725 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P