alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 14 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for a balanced budget 

for the United States Government and for greater accountability in 

the enactment of tax legislation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2011 

Mrs. EMERSON introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution to provide for 

a balanced budget for the United States Government 

and for greater accountability in the enactment of tax 

legislation. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 14 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Prior to each fiscal year, the Congress 

5 and the President shall agree on an estimate of total re6 ceipts for that fiscal year by enactment into law of a joint 

7 resolution devoted solely to that subject. Total outlays for 

8 that year shall not exceed the level of estimated receipts 

9 set forth in such joint resolution, unless three-fifths of the 

10 total membership of each House of Congress shall provide, 

11 by a rollcall vote, for a specific excess of outlays over esti12 mated receipts. 

13 ‘‘SECTION 2. Whenever actual outlays exceed actual 

14 receipts for any fiscal year, the Congress shall, in the en15 suing fiscal year, provide by law for the repayment of such 

16 excess. The public debt of the United States shall not be 

17 increased unless three-fifths of the total membership of 

18 each House shall provide by law for such an increase by 

19 a rollcall vote. 

20 ‘‘SECTION 3. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

21 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

22 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

23 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 14 IH 

1 ‘‘SECTION 4. No bill to increase revenue shall become 

2 law unless approved by a majority of the total membership 

3 of each House by a rollcall vote. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 5. The provisions of this article are waived 

5 for any fiscal year in which a declaration of war is in ef6 fect. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 6. Total receipts shall include all receipts 

8 of the United States except those derived from borrowing. 

9 Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States 

10 except for those for repayment of debt principal. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 7. This article shall take effect beginning 

12 with the second fiscal year after its ratification.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of The Rowe Companies (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 27, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Garry W. Angle, Vice
President-Treasurer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Garry W. Angle      
|Vice President-Treasurer
|February 24, 2006
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 35 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction 

in the enrollment of H.R. 1473. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2011 

Mr. ALEXANDER submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 

3 1473) making appropriations for the Department of De4 fense and the other departments and agencies of the Gov5 ernment for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, 

6 and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Rep7 resentatives shall make the following correction: At the 

8 end of title VIII of division B, insert the following new 

9 section: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 35 IH 

1 ‘‘SEC. 18ll. Notwithstanding any other provision 

2 of law, none of the funds made available in this Act or 

3 any previous Act may be used to carry out the provisions 

4 of Public Law 111–148, or any amendment made by such 

5 Public Law, or title I or subtitle B of title II of Public 

6 Law 111–152, or any amendment made by such title or 

7 subtitle.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.4



Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





I, Terry A. Hanson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







/s/ Terry A. Hanson

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Date: November 8, 2005
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Colorado Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Colorado Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet) 
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 8,501  | 6,645  | 3,257 
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 2,227  | 1,960  | 415    | 709    | 266    |        | 220    | 327    | 218    | 256   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 196    | 398    | 227    | 388    | 94     | 748    | 485    | 593    | 2,241  | 6,703 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 10,986 | 6,267  | 9,085  | 10,995 | 11,347 | 15,040 | 10,715 | 7,172  | 7,244  | 6,397 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 6,423  | 7,263  | 7,479  | 8,885  | 9,229  | 9,685  | 10,285 | 10,625 | 11,945 | 11,173
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 10,043 | 10,439 | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 120 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 120

Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2012

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. LaTourette, and Mr. Becerra) 
 introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Barbara Barrett as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Alan Spoon of Massachusetts on 
May 5, 2012, is filled by the appointment of Barbara Barrett of 
Arizona. The appointment is for a term of 6 years, beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this joint resolution.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TAMPA BUSINESS BROKER, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

SUNERGY SOLAR, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-4153

November 15, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Cheryl K. 

Thomas, Judge.

Rebecca L. Castaneda of The Castaneda Law Firm PLLC, Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Samuel J. Salario, Jr. and Caroline May Poor of Lawson Huck Gonzalez, 

PLLC, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
|                                                                                         
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                           
|View History:                                                                            
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         
|                                                                                         
|Price of U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Mexico  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 1.94   | 1.99   | 1.53   | 2.25   | 2.31   | 2.03   | 2.14  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 5.43   | 5.00   | 2.36   | --     | --     | 8.46   | 5.65   | 6.55   | 7.62   | 3.91  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.63   | 3.49   | 1.87   | 2.68   | 3.45   | 1.71   | 1.85   | 2.93   | 4.34   | 2.83  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 3.48   | 11.10  | 14.72  | 16.68  |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00417-CR

ADAM LEE ELMORE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 5 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1332117

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

A jury convicted appellant Adam Lee Elmore of assault.2

 The trial court set 

his punishment at 365 days’ confinement, suspended imposition of that 

sentence, and placed him on community supervision. The trial court signed a 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2

See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(a)(1) (West Supp. 2014).
2

certification stating that appellant had waived his right to appeal on the record. 

Appellant and his trial counsel also signed the certification.

We sent a letter to appellant, through counsel, informing him of the 

contents of the certification and stating that we could dismiss the appeal unless 

by October 23, 2014, he filed a response showing grounds for continuing it. 

Appellant has not responded. Thus, in accordance with the trial court’s 

certification, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f), 44.3; 

see also Hampton v. State, No. 02-14-00301-CR, 2014 WL 4364054, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Fort Worth Sept. 4, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 4, 2014
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J UNE 28, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 0- 12 66 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock et No. 4 :9 3- cr-0 00 82 -J RH-GRS- 4 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff - App el le e,
ve rs us MARVIN ROB ERTS, a.k .a. “ Bo ss ”, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defen da nt - App el la nt
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t for th e So ut he rn Dis tri ct of Ge or gi a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J un e 2 8, 2 01 1) Befo re WILSON, MARTIN an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM: Kris ti n Wig h Go od m an , app oi nt ed co un se l fo r Mar vi n R ob ert s, fi le d am ot io n t o wi th dr aw on ap pe al , su pp or te d b y a br ie f pr ep ared pu rs ua nt to And er s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18 L.Ed.2d 49 3 (1 96 7) . Rob ert s
res po nd ed , li st in g i ss ue s h e b el ie ve d h adarg ua bl e m eri t. Bec au se rev ie w of t he is su es rai se d b y

Ro be rts an d c ou ns el , as wel l as an in de pe nd en t re vi ew of th e
reco rd as a who le , rev eal s n o i ss ue s o f arg ua bl e m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wit hd raw i s GRANTED , and Ro be rts ’s rev oc at io n o f su pe rv is ed rel eas e an d
se nt en ce ar e AFFIRMED
.

2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 17191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1163-DR]


Kentucky; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, (FEMA-1163-DR), dated March 4, 1997, and 
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Kentucky, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of March 4, 1997:

    The counties of Ballard, Carlisle, Estill, Fulton, Grayson, 
Hart, Hickman, Marshall, Monroe, Pike, and Todd for Categories C 
through G under the Public Assistance program (already designated 
for Individual Assistance, Hazard Mitigation and Categories A and B 
under the Public Assistance program).

    The counties of Breathitt, Clark, Edmonson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, 
Logan, Magoffin, Muhlenberg, Perry, Taylor, and Trigg for Categories 
C through G under the Public Assistance program (already designated 
for Hazard Mitigation and Categories A and B under the Public 
Assistance program).
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Robert J. Adamcik,
Infrastructure Division Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-9075 Filed 4-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P