alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<CIK>     0000064500
<NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         254,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,342,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                   107,131
<INVENTORY>                                  3,309,024
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,074,392
<PP&E>                                       1,437,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 817,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,230,692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,457,734
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        248
<COMMON>                                       129,795
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,623,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,230,692
<SALES>                                     10,346,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,346,369
<CGS>                                        5,730,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,898,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                283,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            251,484
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
No. 12-6548.

#### Miller *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Exhibit 31

                                  Certification

I, JOHN P. GRAZER, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Argent Securities Inc.
Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-W4;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.
<PAGE>

Date: 3/14/06

ARGENT SECURITIES INC.

/s/ John P. Grazer
------------------
John P. Grazer
CFO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marsh Supermarkets, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending October 11, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Douglas W. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ Douglas W. Dougherty
---------------------------
Douglas W. Dougherty
Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004
Exhibit 23.1

FLETCHER SPAGHT, INC.

March 29, 2007

We hereby consent to the use of our firms name, Fletcher Spaght, Inc., in the Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed by VeriChip Corporation
(Commission File Number 001-33297) with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any amendments thereto, and to the inclusion therein of the references to our study commissioned by VeriChip Corporation.

Very truly yours,



|                      |  |                     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|FLETCHER SPAGHT, INC.
|                      | 
|By:.                  |  | /s/ R John Fletcher
|                      |  | Name:               |  | R John Fletcher        
|                      |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |                       |  |                |  |                   
|------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------- |  | ------------------
|222 BERKELEY STREET |  | BOSTON, MA 02116-3761 |  | (617) 247-6700 |  | FAX (617) 247-7757
No. 12-6105.

#### Houghton *v.*Cain, Warden.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### State v. Minton

105,639

105,640

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
#### Andrea CARDINALLI-CAMPOS, Appellant, v. Ronald PLAVNICKY, Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3616

4D16-3617

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[October 5, 2017]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Renee Goldberg, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. DVCE16-1239 and DVCE16-1240.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Tortoise Capital Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, David J. Schulte, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company and Terry Matlack, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
the Reportfully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|By:
      /s/ David J. Schulte | 
|------------------------------ | 
|David J. Schulte               | 
|Chief Executive Officer        | 
|Date: February 13, 2012        | 
|                              
|                              
|By:
      /s/ Terry Matlack    | 
|Terry Matlack                  | 
|Chief Financial Officer        | 
|Date: February 13, 2012        | 

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
No. 12-440.

#### Martinez *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 12-6595.

#### Oriakhi *v.*Wilson, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
# C_2019038EN.01000101.xml

| 31.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9044 — CVC/Recordati)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 38/01)

On 4 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9044. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9044. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 2690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-050-1020-00: GP8-0076]


Notice of Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District, Interior.

ACTION: Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council: Pendleton, 
Oregon; February 19 & 20, 1998.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council will 
be held on February 19, 1998 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on 
February 20 from 8:00 a.m. to noon at the Doubletree Inn, 304 SE Nye 
Ave., Pendleton, Oregon. The meeting is open to the public. Public 
comments will be received at 3:00 p.m. on February 19. Topics to be 
discussed by the Council will include the Interior Columbia Basin 
Ecosystem Management Project, implementation of Standards for Rangeland 
Health and Guidelines for Livestock Grazing on public lands, an update 
on the Oregon Governor's Forest Health Advisory Committee and a 
discussion of operating agreements for future Council meetings. There 
will be a satellite video conference with the Secretary of the Interior 
and BLM Director on February 20.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James L. Hancock, Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District 
Office, 3050 NE Third Street, P.O. Box 550, Prineville, Oregon 97754, 
or call 541-416-6700.

    Dated: January 7, 1998.
James L. Hancock,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 98-1123 Filed 1-15-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
No. 12-6498.

#### Faulk *v.*Lamas, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 82 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

regulation of any expenditure in connection with an election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2011 

Mr. DEUTCH introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States authorizing regulation of any expenditure in connection with an election. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HJ 82 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall have the power to regu3 late any expenditure by a corporation in connection with 

4 an election for Federal office. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. Each of the several States shall have 

6 the power to regulate any expenditure by a corporation 

7 in connection with an election for State or local public of8 fice or a plebiscite in the State. 

9 ‘‘SECTION 3. Nothing contained in this Article shall 

10 be construed to abridge the freedom of the press.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6008

JOSEPH ROBERT BALLANCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MACK JARVIS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.

(CA-98-106-5-HC-F(3))

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Robert Ballance, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ballance appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Ballance v. Jarvis, No. CA-98-106-5-HC-F(3)

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Maine (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Maine (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |         |        |        |        |        | 6,290  | 5,716  | 6,572 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 43,971 | 94,569 | 100,659 | 69,973 | 85,478 | 61,088 | 63,541 | 62,430 | 69,202 | 69,497
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 75,821 | 69,291 | 67,504  | 63,247 | 59,356 | 51,778 | 52,476 | 43,131 | 45,644 | 43,438
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 44,330 | 53,144 | 57,110  | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. WEAVER, A.

925 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

CP-41-CR-0001913-2015

(Lycoming)

Affirmed
No. 12-6543.

#### Beaty *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
#### State v. Gage

102,709

02/18/14

Denied. ...

Unpublished
No. 12-6407.

#### Morales-Caballero *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# C_2019226EN.01000401.xml

| 5.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/4

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty)

(2019/C 226/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.05.2019 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.53579 (2019/N) |
| Member State | Italy |
| Region | BOLZANO-BOZEN | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Criteri per la concessione di aiuti per la rimozione di alberi danneggiati ai sensi dell’art. 48 della legge Provinciale no 21 del 21 ottobre 1996 |
| Legal basis | Criteri per la concessione di aiuti per la rimozione di alberi danneggiati ai sensi dell’art. 48 della legge provinciale 21 ottobre 1996, no 21 |
| Type of measure | Scheme | — |
| Objective | Aid for the prevention and restoration of damage to forests from forest fire, natural disasters, adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to natural disaster, other adverse climatic events, plant pests and catastrophic events |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 25 (in millions) |
| Intensity | 100 % |
| Duration (period) | until 31.12.2022 |
| Economic sectors | Forestry and logging |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ripartizione Foreste — Provincia Autonoma Bolzano
  Via Brennero 6 |
| Other information | — |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.05.2019

Aid number

SA.53579 (2019/N)

Member State

Italy

Region

BOLZANO-BOZEN

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Criteri per la concessione di aiuti per la rimozione di alberi danneggiati ai sensi dell’art. 48 della legge Provinciale no 21 del 21 ottobre 1996

Legal basis

Criteri per la concessione di aiuti per la rimozione di alberi danneggiati ai sensi dell’art. 48 della legge provinciale 21 ottobre 1996, no 21

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Aid for the prevention and restoration of damage to forests from forest fire, natural disasters, adverse climatic events which can be assimilated to natural disaster, other adverse climatic events, plant pests and catastrophic events

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 25 (in millions)

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

until 31.12.2022

Economic sectors

Forestry and logging

Name and address of the granting authority

Ripartizione Foreste — Provincia Autonoma Bolzano

Via Brennero 6

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6653

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARIO MONTAY QUILLER, a/k/a Mecca,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior 

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00295-BR-1)

Submitted: August 21, 2014 Decided: August 26, 2014

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Montay Quiller, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, Denise 

Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Montay Quiller seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Quiller has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED