alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                                  
|View History:                                                                                   
|                                                                                                
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Mississippi (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                
|                                                                                                
|Natural Gas Delivered to Consumers in Mississippi (Including Vehicle Fuel)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 206,845 | 201,303 | 271,218
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 266,008 | 298,296 | 312,317 | 235,345 | 254,727 | 274,431 | 278,563 | 328,487 | 316,214 | 325,132
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 399,073 | 401,561 | 440,741 | 393,161 | 404,969 | 495,596 | 521,540 | 505,327 | 548,312 | 537,484
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 561,342 | 526,140 | 562,376 | 587,274 |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Wilma M. PENNINGTON-THURMAN, Wilma Marie Pennington, Inc, Standing In, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry S. SCHERMER; United States of America, Jeff Sessions, Attorney General of the United States; Bank of America, N.A., CEO Brian T. Moynihan; David A. Sosne, Bankruptcy Trustee; Summers Compton Wells; Brian J. LaFlamme, Attorney for Trustee; Ira Bergman & Bergman, Schraier & Co. and Brown Smith Wallace; Federal Housing Finance Agency, CEO David M. Moffett; Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, CEO Donald H. Layton; Martin Leigh, P.C.; Adam A. Field; Matthew M. Peters; Caitlin Stayduhar; Amy T. Ryan; Thompson Coburn, LLP, Chairman Tom Minogue; Allen D. Allred; Christopher M. Hohn; Seth A. Albin; Bryan Cave, LLP, Managing Partner Robert L. Newmark; Bryan C. Walsh; Rhiana Luaders; Amy E. Breihan; State of Missouri, Attorney General Josh Hawley; David L. Dowd; Timothy J. Boyer; Robert H. Dierker; Angela T. Quigless; Philip M. Hess; Gary M. Gaertner; Millsap & Singer, P.C.; Anne M. Zimmermann; Charles S. Pulliam, III, Defendants-Appellees.

*520No. 17-2041

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 14, 2018

Filed: March 1, 2018

Wilma M. Pennington-Thurman, Pro Se

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Wilma Pennington-Thurman appeals the district court’s128 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of her pro se civil case. Upon careful de novo review, *see Moore v. Sims,*200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we agree with the district court that Pennington-Thurman failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s dismissal. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Catherine D.-Perry, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of McMoRan Exploration Co.
(the "Company") for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Nancy D. Parmelee, as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  March
21, 2005







/s/ Nancy D. Parmelee

Nancy D. Parmelee

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
     <CIK>     0000064500
     <NAME>    SKLAR CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  243,714
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         2,342,628
<ALLOWANCES>                             55,039
<INVENTORY>                           3,206,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      6,125,322
<PP&E>                                1,805,730
<DEPRECIATION>                        1,235,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        7,107,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 3,887,930
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                 248
<COMMON>                                149,795
<OTHER-SE>                            3,069,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          7,107,207
<SALES>                               6,550,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      6,550,862
<CGS>                                 3,212,532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         6,401,945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      261,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          87,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      87,869
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             87,869
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.07


</TABLE>
252PA14-2

#### State v. Thomas Craig Campbell

Defs Motion to Strike Section D of the State’s Brief as Outside the Scope of this Court’s Special Order Allowing the State’s PDR in Part and Denying the State’s PDR in Part

Denied 08/10/2016
#### Pele A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D16-2805

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Roberts, Judge.

Affirmed.
# C_2018041EN.01000601.xml

| 3.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/6

---

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in South Sudan apply

(2018/C 41/03)

The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):

1

The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (2).

2

The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG C 1C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG C 1C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/735.

The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.

The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.

The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.

Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).

3

Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.

Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.

---

(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.

2

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.

3

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.2
 
                       LORAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (Unaudited)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                         ---------------------
                                                                           1995         1994
                                                                         --------     --------
<S>                                                                      <C>          <C>
Primary:
  Net income applicable to common shares...............................  $151,340     $121,217
                                                                         ========     ========
  Shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding........................   171,007      166,998
     Common equivalent shares applicable to stock options..............     3,451        2,874
                                                                         --------     --------
     Average number of shares outstanding and common equivalent
      shares...........................................................   174,458      169,872
                                                                         ========     ========
Primary earnings per common share and common equivalent share..........      $.87         $.71
                                                                         ========     ========
Fully Diluted:
  Net income applicable to common shares...............................  $151,340     $121,217
                                                                         ========     ========
  Shares:
     Average number of common shares as adjusted for primary
      computation......................................................   174,458      169,872
     Incremental increase to shares under stock options where the
      quarter's ending market price is higher than the average market
      price during the quarter.........................................       192           66
                                                                         --------     --------
     Average number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis.....   174,650      169,938
                                                                         ========     ========
Earnings per common share assuming full dilution.......................      $.87         $.71
                                                                         ========     ========
</TABLE>
 
                                       11
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9788]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than April 30, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Dixie Mahurin, Bowling Green, Kentucky; to acquire an additional 
15.95 percent, for a total of 27.97 percent, and Petter and Dixie 
Mahurin, Bowling Green, Kentucky, acting in concert, to acquire an 
additional 21.27 percent, for a total of 26.92 percent, of the voting 
shares of First Cecilian Bancorp, Inc., Cecilia, Kentucky, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Cecilian Bank, Cecilia, Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Walter L. Cox, Sr., Naples, Texas; to acquire an additional 40.8 
percent, for a total of 47.1 percent, of the voting shares of Morris 
County Bankshares, Incorporated, Naples, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Morris County National Bank, Naples, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 10, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-9788 Filed 4-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7364

KARIM ABDUL AKBAR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LIEUTENANT MCKINNEY; SERGEANT RASCOE; G. L. HENRY, Sergeant; J. HAYNES, Warden, Defendants - Appellees, and OFFICER BOWMAN, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-496) Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karim Abdul Akbar, Appellant Pro Se. John Payne Scherer, II, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.* To the extent Akbar alleges a due process violation, we note Akbar had an adequate post-deprivation remedy. See Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517 (1984). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Karim Abdul Akbar appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Akbar’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * Akbar v. McKinney, No. CA-99-496 (M.D.N.C. July 20, 2001).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 12-6436.

#### Gilbert *v.*Wisconsin.

Sup. Ct. Wis. Certio-rari denied.
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company for the
period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Gary J. Wolter                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
        November 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF THE MEAD CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

THIS SCHEDULE SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 11 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND
SECTION 323 OF THE TRUST INDENTURE ACT OF 1939, OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
LIABILITIES OF SUCH SECTIONS, NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY REGISTRATION
STATEMENT TO WHICH IT RELATES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      620
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,318
<PP&E>                                           5,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,711
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              958
<BONDS>                                          1,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           150
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,687
<SALES>                                          3,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,162
<CGS>                                            2,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   366
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    213
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       148
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00469-CV

CITY OF LUBBOCK APPELLANT

V.

TED PARKER APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is 

the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

DELIVERED: May 3, 2012
410P16

#### State v. Joshua Sanchez

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-1401)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 11/07/2016

2.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lufkin Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas V. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    DOUGLAS V. SMITH
|Douglas V. Smith       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 9, 2005            



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.
No. 12-5595.

#### Keen *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.