alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |                                   |                                     |
|------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| Date:December                26,                2007 | By:                                    | /s/ Christopher                Bell |
|                                                 | Christopher                Bell        |
|                                                 | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                                 | Chief                Financial Officer |

----

----
#### State v. Keyes

108,173

06/29/2015

Denied

Unpublished
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Arizona Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)  
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Arizona Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)  
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 103    |        |       
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | -      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Arturo AZALDEGUI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D16-2343

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

[September 28, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Matthew Isaac Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-000044CF10A.

Affirmed.
|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                      
|View History:                                                       
|                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    
|                                                                    
|Texas Natural Gas Underground Storage Capacity  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                    

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 590,248 | 589,780
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 586,502 | 589,018 | 595,229 | 598,782 | 627,589 | 653,420 | 672,533 | 683,891 | 684,226 | 684,226
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 699,323 | 686,000 | 699,471 | 662,593 | 674,196 | 680,096 | 690,061 | 690,678 | 740,477 | 766,768
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 783,579 | 812,394 | 831,190 | 842,072 | 834,124 | 834,965 | 854,469 | 853,043 | 845,081 | 845,081
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 847,640 | 847,485 | 860,268 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019424EN.01002101.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/21 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.9656 — CD&R/Anixter)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 424/08)

1.

On 10 December 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2019424EN.01002101-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund X, L.P. (‘CD&R’, United States), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Anixter International Inc. (‘Anixter’, United States). |

CD&R acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Anixter.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for CD&R: private equity investment group, which originates, structures and acts as a lead equity investor in management buyouts, strategic minority equity investments and other strategic investments, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | for Anixter: global distributor of network & security solutions, electrical & electronic solutions, and utility power solutions. |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2019424EN.01002101-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.9656 — CD&R/Anixter

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2019424EN.01002101-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2019424EN.01002101-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
#### C.S., Father of L.M.K., Minor Child, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

CASE NO. 1D17-2184

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed August 8, 2017

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County. Christopher N. Patterson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12   Madison Gas and Electric Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 (In thousands)   EarningsNet Income before noncontrolling interest$36,716Equity earnings(6,074)Income distribution from equity investees4,656Noncontrolling interest in pretax income(7,941)Amortization of capitalized interest77Interest capitalized(2,528)Federal and state income taxes19,795Fixed charges17,547Total Earnings as Defined$62,248Fixed ChargesInterest expense on long-term debt and other$11,849Interest on rentals*2,613Amortization of debt issuance costs411AFUDC borrowed funds146Capitalized interest2,528Total Fixed Charges$17,547Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges3.55x   *Management believes that using one third of the total rental expense gives a reasonable approximation for actual interest on rentals.
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. ___________ No. 96-1774

___________ John Henry Sheppard, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry G. Hicks, Lt., CO-III * Eastern District of Arkansas Officer, Jefferson Correction * Facility, Arkansas Department * [UNPUBLISHED] of Correction, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 4, 1996
Filed: December 17, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

John Henry Sheppard appeals from the final judgment of the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. For the reasons discussed below, we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice and affirm the judgment as modified.

Sheppard filed a complaint alleging that while he was an inmate at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility (JCCF),-2- Lieutenant Larry Hicks issued him three conduct violations, and sprayed mace in his face three times for no reason. Sheppard sought damages, restoration of 365 days of good time credit and his class status. The magistrate judge ordered the case continued for 120 days to allow Sheppard to exhaust his administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)(1), and required Sheppard to notify the court of his efforts, or risk dismissal.

After the 120 days had expired, Hicks moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that Sheppard had not fully exhausted his administrative remedies. Sheppard opposed the dismissal, stating that he filed a grievance with the JCCF warden, the warden and the assistant director in Pine Bluff, but to no avail; and that he had no further remedies. The district court, adopting the magistrate judge's report, dismissed the action with prejudice. Sheppard appeals.

Exhaustion of administrative remedies is generally not required under section 1983. Wilwording v. Swenson , 404 U.S. 249, 251 (1971) (per curiam). Without deciding whether Sheppard has made a reasonable and good faith attempt to exhaust under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, see Arvie v. Stalder , 53 F.3d 702, 705-06 (5th Cir. 1995), or whether further exhaustion may have been futile, we conclude that dismissal is nonetheless proper under Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364, 2372 (1994) (Heck ). Because Sheppard has requested restoration of good time credits, Heck applies. See Sheldon v. Hundley , 83 F.3d 231, 233 (8th Cir. 1996) (if success on merits of § 1983 claim would imply invalidity of disciplinary result lengthening plaintiff's time spent in prison, Heck requires favorable termination of action in authorized state tribunal or federal habeas court). Consequently, dismissal should be without prejudice. See id. at 234.

Accordingly, we modify the judgment to be without prejudice and affirm the judgment of the district court as mofidied.-3- A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

Application for Recordation of Trade Name: ``Ronson Corporation''

ACTION: Notice of application for recordation of trade name.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Application has been filed pursuant to section 133.12, Customs 
Regulations (19 CFR 133.12), for the recordation under section 42 of 
the Act of July 5, 1946, as amended (15 U.S.C. 1124), of the trade name 
``RONSON CORPORATION,'' used by Ronson Corporation, a corporation 
organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, located at 
Corporate III, Campus Drive, P.O. Box 6707, Somerset, New Jersey 08875.
    The application states that the trade name is used in connection 
with lighters and parts thereof, including pieces of sparking metal/
flints, lighter fluid and liquefied petroleum gas for use in lighters, 
multi-purpose igniters and the like, packaged chemical liquids such as 
multi-use spray lubricants, general purpose sport removers, leather, 
vinyl and rubber surface protectants/cleaners, electric shavers, cigar 
piercers, cigar and cigarette holders, pipe holders, broilers, electric 
knives, electric blenders, electric can openers, electric powered 
toothbrushes, other small electric appliance and writing instruments.
    The merchandise is manufactured in the United States.
    Before final action is taken on the application, consideration will 
be given to any relevant data, views, or arguments submitted in writing 
by any person in opposition to the recordation of this trade name. 
Notice of the action taken on the application for recordation of this 
trade name will be published in the Federal Register.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 23, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to U.S. Customs 
Service, Attention: Intellectual Property Rights Branch, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Ronald Reagan Buiding --3rd Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20229.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delois P. Johnson, Intellectual 
Property Rights Branch, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., (Reagan Building 
--3rd Floor), Washington, D.C. 20229 (202-927-2330).

    Dated: April 17, 1998.
John F. Atwood,
Chief, Intellectual Property Rights Branch.
[FR Doc. 98-10924 Filed 4-23-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
```
No. 12-5760.

#### Libert *v.*Parkersburg City Police et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 90 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. POCKET VERSION OF THE UNITED STATES 

4 CONSTITUTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The 25th edition of the pocket 

6 version of the United States Constitution shall be printed 
2 

•HCON 90 EH 

1 as a House document under the direction of the Joint 

2 Committee on Printing. 

3 (b) ADDITIONAL COPIES.—In addition to the usual 

4 number, there shall be printed the lesser of— 

5 (1) 235,500 copies of the document, of which 

6 220,500 copies shall be for the use of the House of 

7 Representatives, 10,000 copies shall be for the use 

8 of the Senate, and 5,000 copies shall be for the use 

9 of the Joint Committee on Printing; or 

10 (2) such number of copies of the document as 

11 does not exceed a total production and printing cost 

12 of $114,849, with distribution to be allocated in the 

13 same proportion as described in paragraph (1), ex14 cept that in no case shall the number of copies be 

15 less than 1 per Member of Congress. 

16 (c) DISTRIBUTION.—The copies of the document 

17 printed for the use of the House and the Senate under 

18 subsection (a) shall be distributed in accordance with— 

19 (1) a distribution plan approved by the chair 

20 and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

21 House Administration of the House of Representa22 tives, in the case of the copies printed for the use 

23 of the House; and 

24 (2) a distribution plan approved by the chair 

25 and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
3 

•HCON 90 EH 

1 Rules and Administration of the Senate, in the case 

2 of the copies printed for the use of the Senate. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 90 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the printing of the 25th edition of the 

pocket version of the United States Constitution.
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company forthe period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2003, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. WolterChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 9, 2005
|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)               
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                         
|View History:                                                          
|                                                                       
|Babb, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Babb, MT Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                       

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 16,545 | 18,477 | 17,776 | 3,841 
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 295    | 2,571  | 6,326  | 4,645  | 4,333  | 396    | 7,343  | 4,580  | 4,057  | 6,702 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 6,671  | 12,807 | 15,525 | 17,235 | 17,421 | 20,708 | 23,733 | 27,325 | 30,791 | 26,494
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 31,084 | 31,148 | 34,380 | 40,149 |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00319

- CV

CARRIE M. LEO v. TYLER C. THOMAS AND NICHOLAS STACEY D/B/A FRAGILE PLANET WILDLIFE CENTER, FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRAGILE PLANET WILDLIFE FOUNDATION

On Appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- DCL

- 01028

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMIS SED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed, as appel lant filed an
affidavit of inability to pay costs

. We f urther order this decision certified below for observance. November 10, 2021