alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History: Annual                                          
|View History:                                                 
|                                                              
|Oregon Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              
|                                                              
|Oregon Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                              

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 390,029
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 387,778 | 405,163 | 450,261 | 435,002 | 628,931 | 741,523 | 728,952 | 773,152 | 740,433 | 628,608
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 678,458 | 680,368 | 659,944 | 536,776 | 592,855 | 531,868 | 545,670 | 580,638 | 504,550 | 533,197
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 546,254 | 590,489 | 756,096 | 713,049 | 710,137 | 780,662 | 774,120 | 749,868 | 755,167 | 735,872
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 776,347 | 749,394 | 766,631 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 63 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require 

a two-thirds vote of each House of Congress to increase the statutory 

limit on the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2011 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to require a two-thirds vote of each House of 

Congress to increase the statutory limit on the public 

debt. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HJ 63 IH 

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

2 for ratification: 

3 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Congress shall, by law, establish a stat5 utory limit on the public debt. If such a limit is in effect 

6 upon the date of adoption of this article, that limit shall 

7 be the limit for purposes of this section. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 2. The statutory limit on the public debt 

9 may only be increased by the passage of legislation upon 

10 the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Members of each 

11 House, a quorum being present.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
326P15-3

#### Burl Anderson Howell v. North Carolina Wayne County Department of Health and Human Services, By and Through, Reese Phelps; Lou Jones Petitioner’s

Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Appeal *In Forma Pauperis*(COAP16-339)

Dismissed
Underground Injection Control Program | Underground Injection Control | US EPA

http://water.epa.gov/type/groundwater/uic/index.cfm [8/31/2011 9:03:43 AM] EPA Home Privacy and Security Notice Contact Us Last updated on Friday, July 01, 2011 Contact Us 

## Water: Underground Injection Control

Compliance Assistance Reporting Forms for Well Owners and Operators (7520s) Reporting Forms for States and Regions (7520s) Compliance Assistance for Class V Well Operators Frequently Asked Questions Please check back soon for compliance assistance for Class VI wells 

### Injection Well Types Industrial & Municipal Waste Disposal Wells (Class I) Oil and Gas Related Wells (Class II) Mining Wells (Class III) Shallow Hazardous and Radioactive Injection Wells (Class IV) Shallow Non-Hazardous Injection Wells (Class V) Geologic Sequestration Wells (Class VI)


### UIC Documents

Publications Guidance Studies UIC Technical Work Group Products Reporting Forms 

### UIC Program Information

Basic Information History of the UIC Program UIC Program Primacy Animation: Protective Aspects of Hazardous Waste Wells Class V Permitting Authorities UIC Programs on Tribal Lands Grants Regulations Where You Live Glossary 

### About Injection Wells What is an Injection Well? Injection Well Classes Drawing of Well Types Inventory of Injection Wells (PDF) (1 pg, 13K, About PDF ) Technical Overview of the UIC Program (PDF) (87 pp, 1.16MB, About PDF ) 

### Injection Practices Hydraulic Fracturing Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Aquifer Recharge (AR) and Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) You are here: Water Our Waters Ground Water Underground Injection Control Program 

# Underground Injection Control Program

Underground Injection Control Quick Finder Class V Wells Geologic Sequestration of CO2 Reporting Forms (7520s) Class V Injection Wells Study Hydraulic Fracturing UIC Primacy The UIC Program is responsible for regulating the construction, operation, permitting, and closure of injection wells that place fluids underground for storage or disposal. This site provides information for owners and operators of injection wells and state regulators on how to safely operate injection wells to prevent contamination of underground drinking water resources. Water Home Drinking Water Education & Training Grants & Funding Laws & Regulations
Our Waters

Pollution Prevention & Control Resources & Performance Science & Technology Water Infrastructure What You Can Do Drinking Water Ground Water Lakes Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches Rivers & Streams Stormwater Wastewater Watersheds Wetlands Where You Live Share 

### A-Z Index Advanced Search
#### COM. v. GREEN, J.

1848 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/07/2017

CP-06-CR-0002414-2003 (Berks)

Affirmed
#### Com. v. OKEY, P.

1157 WDA 2015

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-25-CR-0000601-2015 (Erie)

Affirmed/Vacated/Remanded
#### COM. v. JOHNS, T.

1628 MDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/17/2017

CP-36-CR-0001443-2009 (Lancaster)

Affirmed
#### COM. v. ALEXANDER, K.

2216 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0702301-2002

(Philadelphia)

Affirmed
#### IN RE: ADOPTION OF: H.D.L., a Minor

938 EDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/24/2017

2016-A0182 (Montgomery)

Affirmed
## Well Files Submitted to EPA Oil and Gas Companies

W hen this document is completed, the final index will be uploaded to the same location and will contain the following data:

 W ell operator;  W ell nam e ;  D ocument name ;  D ocket document number . Docket ORD- 2010 - 0674 .
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10641]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Newspapers Used for Publication of Legal Notice of Appealable 
Decisions for the Northern Region; Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, and 
Portions of South Dakota and Eastern Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the newspapers that will be used by all 
Ranger Districts, Forests, and the Regional Office of the Northern 
Region to publish legal notice of all decisions subject to appeal under 
36 CFR 215 and 217 and to publish notices for public comment and notice 
of decision subject to the provisions of 36 CFR 215. The intended 
effect of this action is to inform interested members of the public 
which newspapers will be used to publish legal notices for public 
comment or decisions; thereby allowing them to receive constructive 
notice of a decision, to provide clear evidence of timely notice, and 
to achieve consistency in administering the appeals process.

DATES: Publication of legal notices in the listed newspapers will begin 
with decisions subject to appeal that are made on or after April 23, 
1998. The list of newspapers will remain in effect until another notice 
is published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristine M. Lee; Regional Appeals and Litigation Coordinator; Northern 
Region; P.O. Box 7669; Missoula, Montana 59807. Phone: (406) 329-3647.
    The newspapers to be used are as follows:

Northern Regional Office

Regional Forester decisions in Montana:
    The Missoulian, Great Falls Tribune, and The Billings Gazette.
Regional Forester decisions in Northern Idaho and Eastern Washington:
    The Spokesman Review.
Regional Forester decisions in North Dakota: Bismarck Tribune.
Regional Forester decisions in South Dakota: Rapid City Journal.

Beaverhead/Deerlodge--Montana Standard
Bitterroot--Ravalli Republic
Clearwater--Lewiston Morning Tribune
Custer--Billings Gazette (Montana)
    Bismarck Tribune (North Dakota)
    Rapid City Journal (South Dakota)
Flathead--Daily Interlake
Gallatin--Bozeman Chronicle
Helena--Independent Record
Idaho Panhandle--Spokesman Review
Kootenai--Daily Interlake
Lewis & Clark--Great Falls Tribune
Lolo--Missoulian
Nez Perce--Lewiston Morning Tribune

    Supplemental notices may be placed in any newspaper, but time 
frames/deadlines will be calculated based upon notices in newspapers of 
record listed above.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Kathleen A. McAllister,
Deputy Regional Forester.
[FR Doc. 98-10641 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6482

CLESTER EARLIS CARTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-05-16)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 4, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clester Earlis Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Clester Earlis Carter, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Carter v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-16

(E.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### State v. Hunt

106,296

08/29/13

Denied. .

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11220]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1214-DR]


Alabama; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Alabama (FEMA-1214-DR), dated April 9, 1998, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madge Dale, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Alabama, is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 
9, 1998:

    Cullman County for Individual Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 83.537, Community 
Disaster Loans; 83.538, Cora Brown Fund Program; 83.539, Crisis 
Counseling; 83.540, Disaster Legal Services Program; 83.541, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 83.542, Fire Suppression 
Assistance; 83.543, Individual and Family Grant (IFG) Program; 
83.544, Public Assistance Grants; 83.545, Disaster Housing Program; 
83.548, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 98-11220 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 9 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 9

  Commemorating 90 years of U.S.-Polish diplomatic relations, during 
 which Poland has proven to be an exceptionally strong partner to the 
          United States in advancing freedom around the world.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 7, 2009

Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Voinovich, and Ms. Mikulski) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commemorating 90 years of U.S.-Polish diplomatic relations, during 
 which Poland has proven to be an exceptionally strong partner to the 
          United States in advancing freedom around the world.

Whereas the United States established diplomatic relations with the newly formed 
        Polish Republic in April 1919;
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 20th anniversary of democracy in Poland, as well 
        as the 20th anniversary of the fall of communism in Poland;
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 10th anniversary of Poland's accession to the 
        North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO);
Whereas the year 2009 marks the 50th anniversary of the Fulbright Educational 
        Exchange Program in Poland;
Whereas Poland has overcome a legacy of foreign occupation and period of 
        communist rule to emerge as a free and democratic nation;
Whereas Poland has strongly supported the United States diplomatically and 
        militarily, as well as supporting United States-led efforts in combating 
        global terrorism, and has contributed troops to the coalitions led by 
        the United States in both Afghanistan and Iraq; and
Whereas Poland has cooperated closely with the United States on issues such as 
        democratization, nuclear proliferation, human rights, regional 
        cooperation in Eastern Europe, and reform of the United Nations: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) celebrates the 90th anniversary of U.S.-Polish 
        diplomatic relations;
            (2) congratulates the Polish people on their great 
        accomplishments as a free democracy; and
            (3) expresses appreciation for Poland's steadfast 
        partnership with the United States.
                                 <all>
```
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. FOOD & DRUG

ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-17131

D.C. No.

3:12-cv-04376-EDL

OPINION

On Remand from the En Banc Court

Filed September 30, 2016

Before: Susan P. Graber, Kim McLane Wardlaw,

and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion
2 ALDF V. USFDA

SUMMARY*

Freedom of Information Act

On remand from the en banc court, the panel reviewed de

novo the district court’s summary judgment in a Freedom of

Information Act case, concluded that there was a genuine

issue of material fact, and reversed and remanded to the

district court for further proceedings.

COUNSEL

Monte M.F. Cooper, Derek F. Knerr, and Scott Lindlaw,

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Menlo Park, California,

for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Lindsey Powell and Michael S. Raab, Attorneys, Appellate

Staff, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington,

D.C.; for Defendant-Appellee.

Caitlin Zittkowski and Cristina R. Stella, San Francisco,

California, as and for Amicus Curiae Center for Food Safety.

* This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has

been prepared by court staff for the convenience of the reader.
ALDF V. USFDA 3

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. FDA, No. 13-17131,

2016 WL 4578362 (9th Cir. Sept. 2, 2016) (en banc) (per

curiam), the en banc court overruled our earlier precedents on

the applicable standard of review in Freedom of Information

Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, cases decided on summary

judgment. The court held that the usual summary judgment

standard applies, so we must review the district court’s

decision de novo. Accordingly, on summary judgment, “if

there are genuine issues of material fact in a FOIA case, the

district court should proceed to a bench trial or adversary

hearing.” Animal Legal Def. Fund, 2016 WL 4578362, at *2.

As we noted in our earlier opinion, Animal Legal Defense

Fund v. FDA, 819 F.3d 1102, 1108–09 (9th Cir. 2016), the

parties submitted competing declarations concerning the

potential competitive effect of releasing egg-production

information. In a per curiam concurrence, we also observed

that, “if ordinary principles applied, summary judgment

would not be appropriate because the record contains a

disputed issue of material fact.” Id. at 1112. Following the

en banc court’s decision, those ordinary principles now

control this case. Applying the usual summary judgment

standard, we conclude that there is a genuine issue of material

fact in this case and, therefore, we must reverse and remand

to the district court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 45 

Honoring the service and sacrifice of members of the United States Armed 

Forces who are serving in, or have served in, Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Mr. FILNER, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. 

BILIRAKIS, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

BARROW, Mr. DENHAM, Mr. RUNYAN, and Mr. HUELSKAMP) submitted 

the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the service and sacrifice of members of the United 

States Armed Forces who are serving in, or have served 

in, Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn. 

Whereas more than 2,000,000 members of the Armed Forces 

have deployed to the theaters of war since the commencement of Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi 

Freedom, and Operation New Dawn; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 45 IH 

Whereas hundreds of thousands of such members have deployed for multiple tours of duty, leaving their homes, 

their families, and in many cases, their civilian jobs; 

Whereas more than 5,500 members of the Armed Forces 

have made the ultimate sacrifice for the United States 

while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan; 

Whereas tens of thousands of additional members of the 

Armed Forces have been seriously wounded in the line of 

duty while serving in these theaters of war; 

Whereas these members of the Armed Forces have answered 

the Nation’s call to duty, serving bravely and nobly and, 

in most cases, without fanfare or acclaim; 

Whereas these members of the Armed Forces have personified the virtues of patriotism, service, duty, courage, and 

sacrifice; and 

Whereas all Americans recognize the service and sacrifices 

made by these members of the Armed Forces and their 

families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) honors the members of the Armed Forces 

4 who are serving in Operation Enduring Freedom, 

5 Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn 

6 and the members and veterans who have previously 

7 served in Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation 

8 Iraqi Freedom, and Operation New Dawn; and 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 45 IH 

1 (2) calls on all Americans to reflect on the serv2 ice of these members and veterans and to hold them 

3 in a special place of honor now and in the future. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS