alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10446]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-337-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

April 15, 1998.
    Take notice that on April 7, 1998, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 
14203, filed in Docket No. CP98-337-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for authorization to construct and 
operate a new sales tap in Pennsylvania under National Fuel's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-4-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    National Fuel proposes to construct and operate a sales tap for 
delivery of approximately 110 Dth per day of gas to clarion River Gas 
Company (CRG). The cost is estimated at $15,000. National Fuel States 
that the proposed sales tap will be located on its Line Q-M95 in 
Barnett Township, Forest County, Pennsylvania.
    National Fuel states that this addition is not prohibited by its 
existing tariff, that there is sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to other customers, that 
its peak day and annual deliveries will not be affected and that the 
total volumes delivered will not exceed the total volumes authorized 
prior to this request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 98-10446 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Brianna Tangonan <briannat@hawaii.edu> 

Thursday, November 28, 2013 4:23 PM 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Department of Transportation 

Dear Department of Transportation, 

I have been flying Mokulele for over 6 years, and I am writing to support Mokulele Airlines 4-year bid link 

Kaulapapa, Kahalui, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele will be the best candidate as they have the 

lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, mulitple islands and ease of booking. It is important 

we have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

Mahalo, Brianna Tangonan 

1
Exhibit 10.35



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Special Assets Division 
 2011 Proposed Incentive Plan 

Participants/Eligibility: All Special Assets Officers in good standing with responsibility for managing relationships and Paul Driscoll.

 Plan Start and End Dates: January 1 – December 31, 2011 
 Payment Frequency: Incentives are earned and accrued quarterly and paid 30 days following the end of the quarter 
 Resolved Transactions (RT): Resolved transactions include: 

	 	•	 	 The partial pay down or complete removal of the non-performing asset, accomplished through collection from guarantors, liquidation of collateral,
short-sale, note sale or other forms of payoff that result in the elimination of the non-performing exposure to the bank 



	 	•	 	 The return of all or a portion of the exposure to “pass rated” 


 Eligible Transactions: All non-performing assets not under contract of resolution as of December 31, 2010 
 Special Assets Decisioning Committee: Theobald, Bloxom, Dix (simple majority). 

Structure: 
 Incentive plan to
include quarterly RT Thresholds of 6% of the Net Active Principal Balance of all loans assigned to the SAO as measured at the end of the prior quarter. SAOs will earn incentive pay on amounts resolved in excess of the RT threshold quarterly, based
on the following payout formula: 
 Payout Formula 

	 	•	 	 0% on the RT threshold amount each quarter 



	 	•	 	 0.75% on the amount above the RT threshold 



	 	•	 	 Driscoll’s incentive will be equal to .0015% of the aggregate of each Special Assets Officer’s RT above their individual 6% thresholds.



 Measurement/Tracking: 

	 	•	 	 Snapshot of each SAO’s assigned transactions is taken on Dec. 31, 2010, March 31, 2011, June 30, 2011, September 30,
2011 and December 31, 2011. 



	 	o	Data elements include: 


	 	¡	 	 Net Active Principal Balance (NAPB) of all borrowers assigned to the SAO 



	 	¡	 	 Resolved Transaction Threshold Amount (RTT) 



	 	¡	 	 Resolved Transaction Actual Amounts (RTA), and 



	 	¡	 	 Incentive Base (IB) 


 The NAPB as measured on December 31 becomes the base for the first quarter Incentive Plan RT target. The NAPB for each of those borrowers is once again measured at the end of the quarter and the
NAPB, RT Threshold Amount, RT Actuals and Incentive Base are calculated as follows: 

	 	¡	 	 NAPB 



The total amount of NAPB of all borrowers assigned to SAO as of the last day of the prior quarter (measured 12/31, 3/31, 6/30, 9/30)


	 	¡	 	 Resolved Transaction Threshold 


 RTT= The Quarterly Threshold Amount = (NAPB) times 6% 

	 	¡	 	 Resolved Transaction Actuals 


 RTA= Borrower #1 NAPB + (chargeoffs) – (Payoffs, Paydowns, returns to pass rated) + Borrower #2 NAPB + (chargeoffs) – (Payoffs, Paydowns, returns to pass rated) + ...Borrower #n
NAPB + (chargeoffs) – (Payoffs, Paydowns, returns to pass rated) 

	 	¡	 	 Incentive Base 


 IB= (RTA – RTT) 
  

	 	•	 	 Incentive Calculation: 


  

	 	    	Quarterly Incentive Paid = IB x 0.75% 


	 	    	See attached Analysis
III 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 35 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Received 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make 

a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473. 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 

3 1473) making appropriations for the Department of De4 fense and the other departments and agencies of the Gov5 ernment for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011, 

6 and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Rep7 resentatives shall make the following correction: At the 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HCON 35 RDS 

1 end of title VIII of division B, insert the following new 

2 section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 18ll. Notwithstanding any other provision 

4 of law, none of the funds made available in this Act or 

5 any previous Act may be used to carry out the provisions 

6 of Public Law 111–148, or any amendment made by such 

7 Public Law, or title I or subtitle B of title II of Public 

8 Law 111–152, or any amendment made by such title or 

9 subtitle.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 14, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                     
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                       
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History: Annual                                                 
|View History:                                                        
|                                                                     
|West Virginia Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     
|                                                                     
|West Virginia Natural Gas Interstate Deliveries  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                     

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0    | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6    | Year-7    | Year-8    | Year-9   
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ---------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           |           | 1,470,635
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 1,513,864 | 1,354,722 | 1,543,220 | 1,656,271 | 1,725,985 | 1,777,613 | 1,899,227 | 1,890,522 | 1,570,388 | 1,705,207
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 1,588,838 | 1,502,459 | 1,504,598 | 1,540,204 | 1,399,548 | 1,313,238 | 1,243,873 | 1,460,906 | 1,546,984 | 1,543,562
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,547,671 | 1,593,831 | 1,284,420 | 1,083,666 | 1,263,442 | 1,635,109 | 1,725,346 | 1,739,709 | 1,978,078 | 2,501,431
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2,969,974 | 3,027,977 | 2,986,304 |           |           |           |           |           |           |          
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### COM. v. STREETER, C.

3092 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

CP-09-CR-0000368-2016 (Bucks)

Affirmed
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Glenn A.
Kleinert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
5, 2008








/s/
Glenn A. Kleinert


Glenn A. Kleinert


President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 12-193.

#### Parker *v.*Mitchell, Chapter 7 Trustee.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
367P16

#### State v. Rahmil Ingram

1. State’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA16-120)

2. State’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

3. State’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 10/05/2016 Dissolved 12/08/2016

2. Denied

3. Denied
#### GAUSSA, R. v. CRAWFORD, R.

1324 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/27/2017

FD 08-004098

(Allegheny)

Quashed
|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                              
|View History:                                                               
|                                                                            
|Colorado Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            
|                                                                            
|Colorado Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 2,813  | 3,440  | 3,591  | 7,549  | 6,265  | 8,763  | 9,872  | 18,776 | 13,652 | 9,971 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 9,981  |        |        |        |        |        | -      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Order entered April 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00379-CV

NEWSOM, TERRY & NEWSOM, LLP AND STEVEN K. TERRY,

Appellants

V.

HENRY S. MILLER COMMERCIAL COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-01306-G

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Brooke Wagner’s April 20, 2020 letter 

informing the Court that no payment arrangements have been made for the 

reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file, no later than May 4, 

2020, written verification he has paid or made arrangements to pay for the record.

We caution appellants that failure to comply could result in the appeal being 

submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 905 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and

(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), I, Greg Thompson, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Monza Ventures,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year
ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies,
in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(
a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.





Date:  November 10, 2011 By:   /s/ Greg Thompson
                                   Greg Thompson
                               President, Chief Executive Officer
                               and Principal Financial Officer
#### Brenda WILLIAMS, et al., Appellants, v. Marye JOHNSON, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D16-2898

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed October 11, 2017

Rehearing Denied November 8, 2017

Law Offices of Robin Bresky, Daniel S. Weinger and Robin Bresky (Boca Raton), for appellants.

*484Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., Jacqueline C. Ledón and Anna-Bo Emmanuel, for appellees.

Before EMAS, LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ. ' '

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Brenda Williams and Epiphany Community Development Corp. appeal from the trial court’s entry of judgment 'in accordance with appellees’ motion for directed verdict in favor of appellees, Marye Johnson and Comprehensive Outreach Programs, Inc. Upon our de novo review, we hold that the trial court properly granted appellees’ motion and entered judgment in their favor. Appellants sought damages on a theory of unjust enrichment. However, given the existence of an express contract covering the same subject matter, “claims arising out of that contractual relationship will not support a claim for unjust enrichment.” Moynet v. Courtois, 8 So.3d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), disapproved of on other grounds, Bank of New York Mellon v. Condo. Ass’n of La Mer Estates, Inc., 175 So.3d 282 (Fla. 2015). See also Braham v. Branch Banking and Trust Co., 170 So.3d 844 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (citing Diamond “S” Dev. Corp. v. Mercantile Bank, 989 So.2d 696 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) for the proposition that plaintiff could.not pursue unjust enrichment claim where express contract existed concerning the same subject matter); Atlantis Estate Acquisitions, Inc., v. DePierro, 125 So.3d 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Kovtan v. Frederiksen, 449 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.
No. 12-6285.

#### Watts *v.*Louisiana.

Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 10 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2011 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution 

of the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two3 thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 10 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year, unless three4 fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall 

5 provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts 

6 by a rollcall vote. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. Prior to each fiscal year, the President 

8 shall transmit to the Congress a proposed budget for the 

9 United States Government for that fiscal year in which 

10 total outlays do not exceed total receipts. 

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may waive the provisions 

12 of this article for any fiscal year in which a declaration 

13 of war is in effect. The provisions of this article may be 

14 waived for any fiscal year in which the United States is 

15 engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and 

16 serious military threat to national security and is so de17 clared by a joint resolution, adopted by a majority of the 

18 whole number of each House, which becomes law. 

19 ‘‘SECTION 4. The Congress shall enforce and imple20 ment this article by appropriate legislation, which may rely 

21 on estimates of outlays and receipts. The appropriate com22 mittees of the House of Representatives and the Senate 

23 shall report to their respective Houses implementing legis24 lation to achieve a balanced budget without reducing the 

25 disbursements of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors InVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:10 Jan 07, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ10.IH HJ10

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 10 IH 

1 surance Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance 

2 Trust Fund to achieve that goal. 

3 ‘‘SECTION 5. Total receipts shall include all receipts 

4 of the United States Government except those derived 

5 from borrowing. Total outlays shall include all outlays of 

6 the United States Government except for those for repay7 ment of debt principal. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall take effect beginning 

9 with the later of the second fiscal year beginning after its 

10 ratification or the first fiscal year beginning after Decem11 ber 31, 2020.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
251P16

#### Kimarlo Ragland v. Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education

1. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Notice of Appeal Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA15-862)

2. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

3. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Petitioner’s *Pro Se*Motion for Addendum to Notice of Appeal and PDR

1.—

2. Denied

3. Allowed

4. Dismissed as moot