alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1024 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1024

    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2011

 Ms. Tsongas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House 
   Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit entities from using Federal funds to contribute to 
       political campaigns or participate in lobbying activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Money for Corporate 
Campaigns Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CAMPAIGN AND 
              LOBBYING ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Prohibition.--With respect to Federal funds received by an 
entity, other than a natural person, it shall be unlawful for such 
entity to--
            (1) use such funds to advocate the election or defeat of a 
        political candidate;
            (2) use such funds for voter registration activities or 
        get-out-the-vote activities;
            (3) use such funds to engage in any lobbying activity; or
            (4) donate such funds to any entity that advocates for the 
        election or defeat of a political candidate or engages in 
        lobbying activities.
    (b) Exception for Activities Authorized by Law.--Subsection (a) 
does not apply to the use of funds by an entity for an activity 
specifically authorized by Federal law, rule, or regulation.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.37

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	
Effective   Date: February 27, 2012
    	
 
    	
Amount RMB3,460,000
    


 

PROMISE TO PAY.  Beijing Shenzhou Deke Technology Development Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (the “Company”) promises to pay to the order of Beijing China Auto Rental Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Lender”) RMB3,460,000 (the “Indebtedness”).

 

MATURITY AND PAYMENT. This Note shall mature within fifteen (15) Business Days after receipt of written notice to the Company by Lender of its demand of repayment of the Indebtedness (the “Due Date”), and the entire balance of the Indebtedness shall be due and payable in full on the Due Date. All payments hereunder shall be in immediately available RMB funds. For the purposes of this Note, “Business Day” shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday under the laws of the People’s Republic of China.

 

MISCELLANEOUS. Nothing in this Note shall waive or restrict any right of Lender granted in any other document or by law.  No delay on the part of Lender in the exercise of any right or remedy shall operate as a waiver. The terms and conditions of this Note may not be amended, waived or modified except in a writing signed by Lender expressly stating that the writing constitutes an amendment, waiver, or modification of the terms of this Note. This Note shall bind the respective successors and assigns of the Company. This Note is governed by the laws of the People’s Republic of China and is made effective as of the Effective Date.

 

SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE

 











 

The Company has duly executed this Note as of February 27, 2012.

 

 

	
 
    	
Beijing   Shenzhou Deke Technology Development Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
a   company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
[Company   seal affixed]
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: Charles Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: Legal   Representative
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133247 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133247 COA: 264826 Wayne CC: 05-001738-01 DAVID ANTHONY EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10911]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Mine Safety and Health Administration


The ``Significant and Substantial'' Phrase in Sections 104 (d) 
and (e) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977; Suspension 
of Interpretative Bulletin

    On February 5, 1998 (63 FR 6012), the Mine Safety and Health 
Administration (MSHA) issued an Interpretative Bulletin which set forth 
the Agency's interpretation of the statutory phrase ``* * * 
significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a 
coal or other mine safety or health hazard * * *'' and which announced 
that MSHA would challenge an interpretation of that language by the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
    In response to concerns raised by the mining industry, on February 
20, 1998 (63 FR 8692), the Agency announced a 60-day comment period on 
the implementation and impact of the interpretation of that phrase. 
During the comment period, the mining industry presented views that the 
approach set out in the Interpretative Bulletin would be overly-
inclusive, resulting in an application that would classify virtually 
all violations as S&S. This was not MSHA's intent.
    The Agency's purpose was to seek an application of the phrase that 
would recognize that serious hazards which have a real possibility of 
causing death or serious injury or illness should properly be 
classified and addressed as S&S violations.
    Upon consideration of the views presented to date, the Agency 
believes that further dialogue on the application of the statutory 
phrase ``significant and substantial'' would better serve all segments 
of the mining community. By this notice, MSHA is hereby suspending the 
Interpretative Bulletin and the applicable provisions of the Program 
Information Bulletin issued on February 5. MSHA will continue to accept 
written comments on this matter.

    Dated: April 20, 1998.
J. Davitt McAteer,
Assistant Secretary for Mine Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 98-10911 Filed 4-21-98; 10:23 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-13-P
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Massachusetts Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Massachusetts Natural Gas LNG Storage Net Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | -3,383 | 2,585  | -1,618 | -700   | 2,734  | 45     | 593    | -2,043 | -1,644 | -6,447
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 308    | -3,967 | -1,844 | -2,368 | -6,820 | -3,134 | -5,364 | -3,517 | -7,243 | -2,447
|2000's                                                                                                                            | -7,518 | 350    | 767    | 4,359  | 1,584  | 3,129  | 156    | -1,560 | -1,694 | -1,221
|2010's                                                                                                                            | -963   | -753   | -1,384 | -864   | 734    | -422   | -974   | -2,509 | 527    | -1,230
|2020's                                                                                                                            | -822   | 52     | -8     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 4/30/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 5/31/2024
Exhibit 10.15
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD GRANTED UNDER THE
VERIGREEN ENERGY CORPORATION
2009 FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN
 [insert name of Grantee]
 Where the option award is to vest in tranches,
use the following sentence as a replacement for the one immediately prior: If to vest over more than, or less than, three tranches, customize
as necessary.
 IMPORTANT
 VeriGreen Energy CorporationBy:Name:Title:
 
 (Insert
Name of Grantee)




---



##### 



TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD GRANTED UNDER
 VERIGREEN ENERGY CORPORATION
 2009 FLEXIBLE STOCK PLAN
 Definitions
 (a)
    
    Committee
    The Committee (or, in certain cases, its designees)
who administers the Stock Option Plan(b)
    
    Company
    VeriGreen Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation(c)
    
    Option
    The option granted by the Option Award(d)
    
    Option Award
    The Non-Qualified Stock Option Award to which the
Terms and Conditions are attached together with,
except where the context requires otherwise, these
Terms and Conditions(e)
    
    Participant
    The recipient of an Option Award(f)
    
    Stock Option Plan
    VeriGreen Energy Corporation 2009 Flexible Stock Plan
  Evidence of Option Grant and Option not an Incentive Stock Option
  Exercise of Option
  Payment of Option Price
   Form of Notice of Exercise




---



##### 



Stock Certificates
  Legends on Certificates
    Termination of Employment/Service; Nonassignability
 Voluntary Termination of Employment or Termination of Employment for Cause
     Other Termination




---



##### 



Termination of Service on the Companys Board of Directors (the Board)
        Non-Transferability of Rights; Designation of Beneficiaries
 Deemed Termination of Employment and Transfer




---



##### 



Withholding
  Right to Exercise Acceleration
  Stock Option Plan Controls
#### State v. Martinez

108,441

07/21/2015

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve

ACTION: Notice of meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for a meeting of the Tallgrass 
Prairie National Preserve Advisory Committee. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

DATES, TIMES, AND ADDRESSES: Wednesday, May 6, 1998; 8 a.m. until 
business and public comment are complete; Council Grove Christian 
Church, 106 East Main, Council Grove, Kansas.
    This business meeting is open to the public. Space and facilities 
to accommodate members of the public are limited and people will be 
accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. An agenda will be 
available from the Superintendent 1 week prior to the meeting. 
Attendees are encouraged to participate in these meetings. If you would 
like to address the committee, please contact the Superintendent by 
April 29, 1998, at the address or telephone number listed below 
requesting that your name be added to the agenda. Depending on the 
number of requests, the Superintendent has the right to limit the 
amount of time each participant is allowed to address this committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Miller, Superintendent, 
Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve, P.O. Box 585, Cottonwood Falls, 
Kansas 66845; or telephone him at 316-273-6034.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve was 
established by Public Law 104-333, dated November 12, 1996.

    Dated: April 15,1998.
Alan M. Hutchings,
Acting Regional Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 98-11441 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
No. 12-6338.

#### Morris v. Cross et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
No. 12-6607.

#### Carr *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11076]



[[Page 20616]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Assessment Governing Board; Meeting

AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board; Education.

ACTION: Amendment to notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of an amendment to the notice of the 
National Assessment Governing Board meeting scheduled for May 7-9, 
1998, at the Crystal Gateway Marriott Hotel, 1700 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, Virginia, as published in the Federal Register on 
March 20, 1998, Vol. 63, No. 78, page 19477. The following changes have 
been made in the session schedule for Friday, May 8. The time for the 
closed meeting of the Subject Area Committee #1 has been extended until 
11:30 a.m. Also, an agenda item was added to the afternoon session of 
the full Board meeting. Between 3:15-4:00 p.m. the Board will hear 
comments from the test development subcontractors for the Voluntary 
National Tests. The Friday, May 8 session of the Governing Board 
meeting will conclude at 4:30 p.m.

    Dated: April 22, 1998.
Roy Truby,
Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board.
[FR Doc. 98-11076 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 2354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-1024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-252, RM-9206]

Radio Broadcasting Services; Columbia City, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Max 
Media proposing the allotment of Channel 243A to Columbia City, 
Florida, as that community's first local broadcast service. The channel 
can be allotted to Columbia City without a site restriction at 
coordinates 30-04-12 and 82-41-42.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 2, 1998, and reply 
comments on or before March 17, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Donald E. Martin, P.O. Box 
19351, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-252, adopted December 17, 
1997, and released January 9, 1998. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 98-1024 Filed 1-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23478-23479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Survey of Steel Mills: Support of a Risk Assessment of Generally 
and Specifically Licensed Devices

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Survey of Steel Mills: Withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 14, 1997, (62 FR 43556) NRC announced its intentions 
to conduct a survey of the steel industry for obtaining data tailored 
to a risk analysis. The survey would have provided empirical data about 
discoveries of radioactive material in the recycling stream. A risk 
analysis would use this information as the basis to systematically 
evaluate the effectiveness of current regulation and possible 
regulatory changes. The analysis supports regulatory changes toward 
improving the control of radioactive devices commonly used in many 
industries.
    The NRC received three letters from trade associations and a steel 
mill. All of these letters indicated that their organizations would not 
support the survey. Because participation in the survey would be 
voluntary and the letters were negative, the response rate for the 
survey would likely be low, resulting in insufficient data for a risk 
analysis as originally planned. Therefore, the NRC has decided not to 
conduct the survey.
    NRC is continuing the risk analysis with appropriate adjustments to 
accommodate for the lack of data available without the survey. The NRC 
will re-evaluate the need for the survey after the risk analysis is 
completed. If the NRC decides to conduct the survey at a later date, 
the survey will be announced in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Ryder, Mail Stop TWFN 10E-
50, Division of Systems Technology, Office of Nuclear Regulatory 
Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
telephone (301) 415-6102; electronic mail address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a8ebf8fae8e6faeb86efe7fe86">[email protected]</a>

    Dated at Rockville, MD., this 22nd day of April, 1998.


[[Page 23479]]


    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Donald A. Cool,
Director, Division of Industrial and Medical Nuclear Safety, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 98-11341 Filed 4-28-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
402PA15-2

#### State v. Donna Helms Ledbetter

1. Def’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA15-414-2)

2. Def’s Petition for *Writ of Supersedeas*

1. Allowed 12/22/2016

2.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
| /s/ Michael      F. Vagnini                                                                                 |   |   |   |
| Michael      F. Vagnini, Senior Vice President andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
#### Jennifer REYES, Appellant/Petitioner(s), v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, Appellee/Respondent(s).

CASE NO.: 2D17-31

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 22, 2017

L.T. No.: 2016DP000709NC

Dismissed.
#### State v. Calhoun

105,723

06/14/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished