alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 23 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States requiring 

that the Federal budget be balanced. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2011 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States requiring that the Federal budget be balanced. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 23 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall 

3 not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year. 

4 ‘‘SECTION 2. Total outlays shall not exceed 18 per5 cent of the gross domestic product of the United States 

6 for the calendar year ending prior to the beginning of such 

7 fiscal year. 

8 ‘‘SECTION 3. The Congress may provide for suspen9 sion of the limitations imposed by section 1 or 2 of this 

10 article for any fiscal year for which two-thirds of the whole 

11 number of each House shall provide, by a roll call vote, 

12 for a specific excess of outlays over receipts or over 18 

13 percent of the gross domestic product of the United States 

14 for the calendar year ending prior to the beginning of such 

15 fiscal year. 

16 ‘‘SECTION 4. Any bill to levy a new tax or increase 

17 the rate of any tax shall not become law unless approved 

18 by two-thirds of the whole number of each House of Con19 gress by a roll call vote. 

20 ‘‘SECTION 5. The limit on the debt of the United 

21 States held by the public shall not be increased unless two22 thirds of the whole number of each House of Congress 

23 shall provide for such an increase by a roll call vote. 

24 ‘‘SECTION 6. Any Member of Congress shall have 

25 standing and a cause of action to seek judicial enforceVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:46 Feb 10, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HJ23.IH HJ23

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•HJ 23 IH 

1 ment of this article when authorized to do so by a petition 

2 signed by one-third of the Members of either House of 

3 Congress. No court of the United States or of any State 

4 shall order any increase in revenue to enforce this article. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 7. The Congress shall have the power to 

6 enforce this article by appropriate legislation. 

7 ‘‘SECTION 8. Total receipts shall include all receipts 

8 of the United States except those derived from borrowing. 

9 Total outlays shall include all outlays of the United States 

10 except those for repayment of debt principal.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# C_2022237EN.01007501.xml

| 20.6.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/75

---

Action brought on 29 April 2022 — Cherusci v EUIPO — LexDellmeier (RIALTO)

(Case T-239/22)

(2022/C 237/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Cherusci Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LexDellmeier Intellectual Property Law Firm (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark RIALTO — EU trade mark No 11 706 546

Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2022 in Case R 695/2021-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order EUIPO to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

---
# Table 10.16

# RSE 10.16
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Amendment Company Employee
 WHEREAS Employment Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
        (f)
    
    Salary Continuation.
 Termination other than in connection with a Change In
Control
 1




---



##### 



After a Change in Control
  (g)
    
    Good Reason Defined. Good Reason means:
     2




---



##### 



(h)
    
    Change in Control Defined. Change in
Control means the occurrence of any of the following events as a
result of a transaction or series of transactions:
        Remainder of page left intentionally blank; signature page follows
 3




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 COMPEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.By:  /s/ DAN GLADNEY
Name:  Dan GladneyIts:  Chief Executive Officer/s/ MARSHALL T. MASKOMarshall T. Masko
 4
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
STATES CODE)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Banco Macro S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                       |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 24, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ Jorge Pablo Brito
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                 |  | Jorge Pablo Brito      
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 61 

Designating a National Railroad Memorial located in Diamond District Park 

in historic downtown Durand, Michigan, as the ‘‘National Railroad Memorial’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 16, 2011 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan submitted the following concurrent resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Designating a National Railroad Memorial located in Diamond District Park in historic downtown Durand, Michigan, as the ‘‘National Railroad Memorial’’. 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial in Durand, Michigan, is organized as an incorporated, not-for-profit organization in the State of Michigan, and is devoted to inspiring national recognition of the men and women of the 

railroad industry who helped build and develop the 

United States of America; 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial has as its mission: 

To honor the men and women of the railroad industry by 

educating the public as to the importance of their roles 

in our Nation’s past, present, and future; 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 61 IH 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial is an idea originally 

conceived by William Taylor, Jr., of Niles, Michigan, to 

honor the men and women of the railroad industry; 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial is a centerpiece of 

Diamond District Park, located at the historic crossroads 

of three major railroads and one of the largest surviving 

train stations in the United States; 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial is intended to encompass the statuary, structures, and historic railroad 

equipment located in historic Durand, Michigan; 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial is designed to be a 

destination attraction, located in the middle of the spectacular Great Lakes region, for visitors from all over the 

world; and 

Whereas the National Railroad Memorial Inc., in conjunction 

with the Michigan Railroad History Museum and the 

Steam Railroading Institute, seeks to educate a diverse 

audience through exceptional exhibits, that provide educational programing for adults and children: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a Na3 tional Railroad Museum located in Diamond District Park 

4 in historic downtown Durand, Michigan, be designated as 

5 the ‘‘National Railroad Memorial’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Simon BAZALDUA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 2D15-4434

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Opinion filed March 3, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSo-to County; James S. Parker, Judge.

Affirmed.
# lnventoryExpertService

·---- .. **-------· ••**  **·· ·-•**  **•• ~-~**  **-•-'"' '** __ ,...,_,,. ,¥

_ , .,.,. ,,,,.. ,.,...___. _ ... ,, ___ , ,,.

.. -r,,.,.,. _ ....._,. __,_,. _ .. , __ .,.__., ,_, , _ .. 

### , .., ,. N,.---·- - - ·- .. -- ..•--• - A div i sio n of the American C hemic a l Soc i ety Phone: 800-631· 1884, 61 4 · 447 -3870 Fax : 614·4 4 7·3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.org / products / ot h er·cas·products/clien t-serv i ces/



# INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT

IES Order Number {"; 59662 

# l Reg istry Number:



# 4855~14-9 

# j CA 

### Index Name: ]



# ubamic acid,



# N~(3~isocyanatometbylphenyl)~, 2- [2-(2- L. 'ttoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl ester

CAS P l ease print t h e a b ove CA Ind ex N a m e on the ap propriat e page of your PMN.
If th i s box i s c he c ked, CAS h as made co rr ec ti on(s ) m a rk e d in r ed t o yo u r IES o r der. P l ease make th e same co rr ec tion s to you r P MN before submitt i ng i t to t h e E PA.
25 40 O l en t a n gy R i ver Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210-0334 

### USA
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Banco Macro S.A. (the Company), does hereby certify that, to the best of such officers knowledge:



| | 1. | The accompanying Report of the Company on Form 20-F (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: April 26, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jorge Horacio Brito       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Jorge Horacio Brito     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Banco Macro S.A. and will
be retained by Banco Macro S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018281EN.01001801.xml

| 10.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/18

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 281/05)

| Member State | Republic of Lithuania |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Vilnius Airport (Republic of Lithuania)-London City Airport (United Kingdom) |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | The public service obligation for scheduled air transport services on the route comes into force from the publication of this notice. |
| Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained | For further information please contact:





  State Enterprise Lithuanian Airports |
| Rodūnios road 10A |
| LT-02189 Vilnius |
| LITHUANIA |
| Tel. +370 52739326 |
| Fax +370 52329122 |
| http://www.ltou.lt/ |
| avia@ltou.lt |

Member State

Republic of Lithuania

Route concerned

Vilnius Airport (Republic of Lithuania)-London City Airport (United Kingdom)

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

The public service obligation for scheduled air transport services on the route comes into force from the publication of this notice.

Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained

For further information please contact:

State Enterprise Lithuanian Airports

Rodūnios road 10A

LT-02189 Vilnius

LITHUANIA

Tel. +370 52739326

Fax +370 52329122

http://www.ltou.lt/

avia@ltou.lt

---
No. 12-5715.

#### Diallo *v.*Holder, Attorney General.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**WELLSTAR      INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**FORM      10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2007**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of the Company for the                year ended July 31, 2007, which this certification accompanies (the                "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |   |                                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:                  November 13, 2007 | By:    | */s/              John Antonio*               |   |
|                                      |   | Name:              John Antonio               |   |
|                                      |   | Title:                Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                      |   |                                          |   |
|                                                                                            
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                               
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nebraska Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            
|                                                                                            
|Percent of Industrial Natural Gas Deliveries in Nebraska Represented by the Price  (Percent)
|                                                                                            

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 27.0   | 12.7   | 14.2  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 15.4   | 18.0   | 15.7   | 16.5   | 16.5   | 16.3   | 11.6   | 9.7    | 10.2   | 8.9   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 8.2    | 7.6    | 6.8    | 7.8    | 7.4    | 7.1    | 6.2    | 6.1    | 5.3    | 5.5   
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 5.2    | 5.2    | 5.3    | 5.5    |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
Order filed August 25, 2022

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-22-00118-CV

__________

RAFAEL MATA AND RAFAEL FELIX MATA, Appellants

V.

JOSE VELAZQUEZ, SR., Appellee

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV36750

O R D E R

Rafael Mata and Rafael Felix Mata, Appellants, filed a notice of appeal after

the trial court entered an order granting a no-evidence motion for summary judgment 

filed by Jose Velazquez, Sr., Appellee. After the clerk’s record was filed, we sent a 

letter to the parties and expressed some concern about the finality of the trial court’s 

summary judgment order because (1) the summary judgment order does not 

expressly indicate that it is final and appealable and (2) nothing in the clerk’s record 

indicates that Appellee’s counterclaims have been disposed of. Appellants filed a 

response to this court’s letter. In their response, Appellants explained that they 

believed the summary judgment order to be final and appealable, in part, because 
2

Appellee’s only claim—for sanctions and attorney’s fees—was not severable from 

the main action. See Lane Bank Equip. Co. v. Smith S. Equip., Inc., 10 S.W.3d 308, 

312 (Tex. 2000) (noting that “a judgment does not have to resolve pending sanctions 

issues to be final”); see Mantri v. Bergman, 153 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 2005, pet. denied). However, Appellee later informed this court that he did 

not believe that the trial court’s summary judgment order was a final, appealable 

order. Because the parties disagree and because it is not clear from the language of 

the trial court’s order whether it intended to dispose of all parties and all claims, we 

abate this appeal so that the trial court may clarify the matter. 

Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from 

final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 

2007); Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A judgment 

is final and appealable if it disposes of all parties and all claims in the case. 

Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195. In this case, the trial court’s summary judgment order

contains a “Mother Hubbard” clause but does not contain the finality language 

suggested by the Texas Supreme Court in Lehmann: “This judgment finally disposes 

of all parties and all claims and is appealable.” See id. at 201, 206. When “the 

appellate court is uncertain about the intent of the order, it can abate the appeal to 

permit clarification by the trial court.” Id. at 206. That is the situation here. 

Consequently, we abate this appeal pursuant to Lehmann and direct the trial 

court to clarify its intent regarding the finality of its judgment in this cause. A 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order of clarification is due 

to be filed in this court on or before September 30, 2022.

The appeal is abated.

August 25, 2022 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.