alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-4626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIK G. TYLER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CR-00-121-AW) Submitted: December 20, 2000 Decided: January 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Wyda, Federal Public Defender, Beth M. Farber, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. LynneA. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Steven M. Dettelbach, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Eric G. Tyler appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (West Supp. 2000). We affirm. Tyler contends that the district court erred by excluding photographic evidence presented by defense counsel. “[D]ecisions regarding the admission and exclusion of evidence are peculiarly within the province of the district court, not to be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Ellis , 121 F.3d 908, 926 (4th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted).We have reviewed the record and briefs and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the photograph. Accordingly, we affirm Tyler’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### ROSE, J. v. The FARMER’S FIRE INS. CO.

2683 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/21/2017

Reargument Denied 8/21/2017

2014-C-3423 (Lehigh)

Quashed
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                          
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        47,173
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              6,819,334
<ALLOWANCES>                               1,054,120
<INVENTORY>                                2,481,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           9,055,422
<PP&E>                                     4,993,009
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,660,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            11,388,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,614,562
<BONDS>                                    2,030,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     485,109
<OTHER-SE>                                 5,366,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              11,388,289
<SALES>                                    7,881,045
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           7,881,045
<CGS>                                      2,108,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,105,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             595,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           195,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              666,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                 229,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          666,571
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 437,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.090
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.090
                             


</TABLE>
International Water Conference (IWC) 2011 

Discussion of: 

NORM Removal from Hydrofracturing Water 

Paper: IWC 11-07 

Authors: JAMES SILVA, HOPE MATIS, WILLIAM KOSTEDT IV, AND VICKI 

WATKINS, GE Global Research Center 

Discusser: JERRY L. PENLAND, Chester Engineers Technology Group, 

Pittsburgh PA 

This paper is a follow-up to a paper presented last year at IWC. In the previous 

paper the use of the ion exchange resin RSC was proposed as being a method 

for removing radium from fracturing fluids. It was discussed that using barium 

sulfate-radium coprecipitation was not cost effective when radium activity was 

greater that 400pCi/L. 

This paper discusses the problems associated with using RSC resin as the 

preferred pretreatment method for radium removal. The authors explain that 

both barium and total dissolved solids affect the RSC capacity significantly. 

Alternate adsorbents were apparently evaluated, and only a general statement is 

made. The authors’ stated, based on a screening study.... “Barium sulfate and 

inorganic oxides had the best performance”. 

I took the time to investigate radium removal techniques developed in the nuclear 

industry, and analytical quantitative methods used for removing and 

concentrating radium from water for analysis. 

Two documents that I would refer the authors to are: 

1. Analytical methodology for the Determination of Radium Isotopes in 

Environmental Samples, IAEA #IAWA/AQ/19, Vienna 2010 

2. Radiochemistry of Radium, National Academy of Science. 

Both of these documents discuss in some detail the sorption of radium onto 

numerous inorganic materials. Barium sulfate is the preferred sorbent. Methods 

for removal of the radium from the sorbent are also discussed with removal 

efficiencies being quantitative. 
Considering that barium is a significant naturally occurring element in fracturing 

fluid flowback, and is a preferred material for radium removal when precipitated 

with sulfate, why are other materials being pursued? 

Can a partial barium precipitation be used to remove the radium in order to 

minimize the amount of solids being generated? 

In view of the fact that the RSC resin did not work as previously proposed, I feel 

that the paper should have provided removal data on the barium and other 

inorganic oxide that were evaluated. No actual method for removal of NORM was 

discussed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DOUGLAS GORMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3351

[May 10, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Usan, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-11979CF10A.

Ashley D. Kay, Fort Lauderdale and Kevin J. Kulik, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|California Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          
|                                                          
|California Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 369,864 | 400,381 | 460,891 | 474,310 | 446,015 | 409,619 | 384,771 | 349,484
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 350,324 | 366,598 | 353,247 | 303,798 | 298,177 | 268,046 | 274,325 | 274,090 | 305,035 | 371,953
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 365,517 | 366,764 | 347,223 | 323,245 | 305,858 | 303,889 | 301,153 | 293,639 | 282,497 | 262,853
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 273,597 | 238,082 | 234,067 | 238,012 | 225,787 | 224,178 | 194,428 | 202,993 | 193,220 | 188,090
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 148,141 | 128,566 | 129,305 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
186P16

#### State v. Terry Thorne

Defs *Pro Se*PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA15-404)

Denied
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC 10-Q.
Items 1 through 22 are as of June 30, 2000. Items 23 through 38 are for the six
months ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      435,198
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,601
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          64,710
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        23,789
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 527,298
<COMMON>                                        16,414
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      118,607
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             57,181
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 192,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           168,619
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,200
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 155,277
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  527,298
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      148,698
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,013
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     125,166
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     131,179
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         17,519
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,342
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,861
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         6,372
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,489
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   12,489
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,678
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,318
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          36,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6437

ROBERT EARL DILLARD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. SCOTT LEWIS, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Mary Gordon Baker , Magistrate Judge. ( 2:18

- cv
- 03103

- JFA )

Submitted : June 13, 2019 Decided: June 18, 2019

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Earl Dillard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Earl Dillard has filed a notice of appeal i n his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition pending in the district court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Co hen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because the district court has not entered a final order or an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 78 (Thursday, April 23, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20213-20214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10833]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notification of Availability of the Monetization Field Manual

AGENCY: U.S. Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of document availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Food for Peace (FFP), within the Bureau for 
Humanitarian Response (BHR), U.S. Agency for International Development 
(USAID), hereby announces the availability of its Monetization Field 
Manual. The Monetization Field Manual sets out the Office's policy and 
guidelines for Cooperating Sponsor sales of P.L. 480 Title II 
commodities. Interested parties are invited to provide written comments 
on the manual within 30 days of publication of this notice.

AVAILABILITY: The Monetization Field Manual is available on USAID's web 
site at:

http://www.info.usaid.gov/hum__response/ffp/ffp.htm

Requests for hard copies must be faxed to the attention of Mr. James F. 
Thompson at 202-216-3042.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the Monetization Manual should be sent to: Mr. 
James F. Thompson, U.S. Agency for International Development, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.--Room 7.06-111, Washington, DC 20523.

[[Page 20214]]

Comments can also be faxed to Mr. Thompson's attention at 202-216-3042.
Jeanne Markunas,
Acting Director, Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Humanitarian 
Response, U.S. Agency for International Development.
[FR Doc. 98-10833 Filed 4-22-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
#### COM. v. VASQUEZ, J.

528 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/25/2017

CP-51-CR-0001754-2011 (Philadelphia)

Quashed
No. 12-5520.

#### Leon *v.*Danaher Corp. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Arkansas Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1    | Year-2    | Year-3    | Year-4    | Year-5    | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | --------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |           | 123,324   | 126,303   | 133,961   | 153,958   | 129,757 | 139,876 | 165,512 | 173,309
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 174,156 | 164,412   | 202,066   | 195,863   | 187,120   | 186,754   | 221,343 | 207,960 | 187,921 | 169,575
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 171,265 | 166,396   | 161,476   | 169,279   | 186,815   | 190,302   | 270,081 | 269,724 | 446,318 | 679,784
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 926,426 | 1,071,944 | 1,145,744 | 1,139,168 | 1,122,151 | 1,009,831 | 822,785 | 694,299 | 589,701 | 524,500
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 480,995 | 448,081   | 416,015   |           |           |           |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     TCC Equipment Income Fund
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000820083
<NAME>                        TCC Equipment Income Fund
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,720
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                   683
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6
<PP&E>                                         26,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          895
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,888
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,207
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (92)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                525
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                  
|View History:                                                   
|                                                                
|No chart available.                                             
|No chart available.                                             
|                                                                
|                                                                
|West Virginia Natural Gas Vented and Flared (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | NA     | 0      | NA     | NA     | NA     | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Carter

106,218

08/19/13

Denied. ...

Unpublished
Appendix C

PICTURES FROM THE SAMPLING EPISODE
C-1

Figure C-1. Sampler Working Inside a “Cleanbox”
C-2

Figure C-2. Sample Set Up at the Influent to the FGD Wastewater Treatment System
C-3

Figure C-3. Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Influent to the SBR System
C-4

Figure C-4. Composite Sample Collection Set Up at the Effluent from the SBR System