### Order 2011

- 4

- 7 Served: April 6 , 2011



## UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 6 t h day of April , 20 1 1

ORDER REQUESTING PROPOSALS
Summary By this O rder, the Department is requesting a second round of proposals from carriers interested in providing E ssential A ir S ervice (EAS) at Kalaupapa , Hawaii, for a two

- year period
, with or without subsidy. (See Appendix A for a service area map

. ) Carriers should file their proposals no later than April 22
, 20 11

. Background Pacific Wing s provided subsidized EAS at the community from 2002

- 2007. Beginning

on April 1, 2007, Pacific Wings provided subsidy

- free EAS at the community with a schedule generally consist ing of at least 12 weekly nonstop round trips to Honolulu (or Molokai) with 9

- seat Cessna Grand Caravan aircraft.

On December 6, 2010, Pacific Wings f iled a 90

- day notice of its intention to suspend its subsidy

- free service at Kalaupapa, effective March 6, 2011.

In response to Pacific Wings’ notice to suspend subsidy

- free EAS , the Department issued Order 2010

- 12

- 30 on December 23, 2010
, prohibiting Pac ific Wings from suspending service and soliciting proposals to provide efficient EAS, with subsidy support if necessary, at Kalaupapa

. Carriers were directed to file their proposals not later than January 27, 2011

. However, o n January 25, Pacific Wings withdrew its notice of intent to end its subsidy

- free EAS at Kalaupapa

. On January 27, Schuman Aviation Company Ltd., d / b / a Makani Kai Air Charters (Makani Kai) and SeaPort Airlines, Inc. (SeaPort) submitted proposals to provide subsidized EAS at the comm unity.

SeaPort proposed to provide two nonstop round trips a day between Kalaupapa and Honolulu, six days a week
, utilizing nine

- seat Cessna Grand Caravans (the same aircraft Essential Air Service at

KALAUPAPA , HAWAII

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. D ocket DOT

- OST

- 200 0

- 6 773

### - 2

-

used by Pacific Wings), for a first

- year annual subsidy of $1,254,084

, and $1,251,104 for the second year.
Makani Kai would provide two nonstop round trips a day between Kalaupapa and Honolulu and three nonstop round trips a day between Kalaupapa and Molokai (or “topside”) , also utilizing nine

- seat Cessna Grand Caravans, fo r an annual subsidy rate of $877,710.

The two proposals and entire public docket regarding EAS at the community may be accessed online through the Federal Docket Management System at: http://www.regulations.gov
, t hrough a search on Docket Number DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 6773.

Decision In cases where a carrier proposes to provide EAS without subsidy and we determine that service can be provided reliably without subsidy, we typically do not proceed with the carrier

- selection ca se. However, in this case, a fter careful consideration, we have decided
to continue to process the ca rrier

- selection case and solicit a second round of proposals for EAS at Kalaupapa by April 22

. Should Makani Kai and/or SeaPort still be interested in providing EAS to the community, the carriers should resubmit their existing proposals,

or submit revised proposals by the date noted above

– April 22 , 2011, the deadline for submissions from any interested carrier

. As a result of frequent complaints from the community about its air service , we examined Pacific Wings’ service at Kalaupapa . We reviewed monthly data that Pacific Wings (and all airlines) are required to submit to the Department ’ s Bu reau of Transportation Statistics (BTS). Th e s e data are summarized in Appendices B and C

. Appendix B details the number of enplanements at Kalaupapa. From 2007

- 2010
, enplanements at Kalaupapa have declined and have been 3,206, 3,135, 2
, 035, and 895, respectively in these years

. Appendix C details the number of scheduled and completed flights by Pacific Wings at Kalaupapa and calculates the corresponding complet ion percentage for each year

. From 2007

- 2010, the completion percentage s at Kalaupapa were 77.7, 95.2, 91.6 and 81.1, respectively. Whether or not the service is subsidized, c ommunities are entitled to receive the ir minimum EAS levels, established by statute. Here, t he completion percentage at the community falls short of acceptable level s of EAS , and we believe that Kalaupapa is not receiving the EAS to which it is entitled

. In light of the decrease in enplanements and flight completion percentages, a s well as continuing service complaints, we are solicit ing a second round of proposals for EAS that meet the unique needs of Kalaupapa , due April 22

. We will also provide the opportunity to comment on the data presented in Appendices B and C by that date.

Finally, Pacific Wings is legally required to continue to provide EAS at the communi ty during the completion of this carrier

- selection proceeding. This service should consist of at least 12 nonstop round trips per week between Kalaupapa and Honolulu (or Molokai) using at least nine

- seat Cessna Grand Caravan aircraft. 1

1 See 49 U.S.C. § 41734.

### - 3

-

Request for Propos als C arriers interested in providing service at Kalaupapa with or without subsidy, should file their proposals no later than April 22
, 20 1 1

. Staff will then docket proposals, thereby making them public, and shortly afterwards will provide a summary of the proposals to the communit y and ask them for their final comments. We will give full consideration to all proposals filed in a timely manner. 2



### Interested carriers should prepare their proposals with every expectation that their initial proposals will rep resent their final and only proposals. However, we retain the discretion to negotiate proposals with carr iers when we deem it appropriate . We also retain the discretion to reject outright all unreasonable or unrealistic proposals and re

- solicit a new

rou nd of proposals. However, negotiation and rejection are only occasional exceptions to the rule.

We are here providing interested carriers with some basic information to serve as guidance when they prepare their proposals, but we will not prescribe a prec ise format for their proposals. We expect proposals to adequately describe the service being proposed and the annual amount of subsidy being requested. The applicants can make their own judgments as to the level of detail they wish to present; however, t hey might want to include proposed schedules
, as well as supporting data for their subsidy requests, such as projected block hours, revenues and expenses. We strongly encourage clear, well

documented proposals that will facilitate their evaluation by the affected communit y and the Department. 3



### The Depar tment expects proposals that consist of 12 weekly roun d trips with nine

- seat or larger aircraft that meet the community ’s unique needs . We encourage proposals that meet those requirements in an efficient manner. Carriers are also welcome to propose more than one service option, if they choose; they need not limit themselves to those requirements if they envision other, potentially more attractive service possibilities

-- different hubs, for example

-- wit h subsidy requirements that remain competitive.

The communit y and air carriers are encouraged to work together in advance of the due date for proposals to craft service patterns that are desirable to the communit y and meet the operational requirements of the airline.

2 Carriers should not expect the Department to accept late filli ngs. 3 In selecting a carrier to provide subsidized essential air service, 49 U.S.C. 41733(c) (1) directs us to consider four factors: (a) scheduled service reliability; (b) contractual and marketing arrangements with a larger carrier to ensure service beyond the hub; (c) interline arrangements that the applicant has made with a larger carrier at the hub; and (d) community views, giving substantial weight to the views of the elected officials representing the users. In addition, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110

- 161, provides that when selecting a carrier to provide EAS, the Department may consider the relative

su bsidy requirements

.

### - 4

-

New Filing Procedures Carrier proposals should be submitted to the Department with all materials compi l ed into a single document. In addition, because the document will be published on http://www.regulations.gov/ , each page should be formatted to be viewed online and for easy printing

. Other Carrier Requirements The Department is responsible for implementing various Federal statutes governing lobb ying activities, drug

- free workplaces, and nondiscrimination. 4 

### Consequently, all carriers receiving Federal subsidy for EAS must certify that they are in compliance with Department al regulations regarding drug

- free workplaces and nondiscrimination, and th ose carriers whose subsidies exceed $100,000 over the life of the rate

- term must also certify that they are in compliance with the regulations governing lobbying activities. Because the Department is prohibited from paying subsidy to carriers that do not submit these documents, all carriers that plan to submit proposals involving subsidy should be aware that the selected carrier will be required to complete the required certifications. Interested carriers requiring more detailed information regarding thes e requirements should contact the Department’s Office of Aviation Analysis at (202) 366

- 5903. 5


### Community and State Comments The communit y and s tate are welcome to submit comments at any time. We encourage prospective applicants to contact the communit y b efore they submit their proposals so that they can tailor them to the communit y ’ s needs, as they will not be able to amend them after the due date. As noted earlier, we will provide a summary of the proposals to the civic parties and ask them to submit th eir final comments shortly after April 22
, the deadline for carrier proposals.

This O rder is issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.56a(f).

ACCORDINGLY, 1. We request that carriers interested in providing E ssential A ir S ervice at Kal a u papa , Hawaii, submit their proposals, with or without subsidy requests, no later than April 22
, 2011. The proposals should be e

- mailed to: EAS@dot.gov with the title “Proposal to Provide Essential Air Service at Kala u papa, Hawa ii, Docket DOT

- OST

2000

- 6773. ” 6

4 The regulations applicable to these areas are: (1) 49 CFR Part 20

-- New R estrictions on L obbying; (2) 49 CFR Part 21

-- Nondiscrimination in F ederally

- A ssisted P rograms of the Department of Transportation

-- Effectuation of T itle V I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (3) 49 CFR Part 27

-- Nondiscrimination on the B asis of D isability in P rograms and A ctivities R eceiving or B enefiting from Federal F inancial A ssistance; (4) 14 CFR Part 382

-- Nondiscrimination on the B asis of D isability in A ir T ravel; and ( 5 ) 49 CFR Part 29

-- Government

- W ide D ebarment and S uspension ( N on

- P rocurement) and G overnment

- W ide R equirements for D rug

- F ree W orkplace ( G rants). 5 The certifications are also available on the web at http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/X

- 50 Role_files/essentialairservice.htm

. 6 Questions regarding filings in response to this order may be directed to Brian Swanson at (202) 366

- 5392

or brian.swanson@dot.gov

.

### - 5

-

2. The Department directs interested parties to submit any comment s on this Order, including its Appendices
, by April 22 , 2011

. Comments should be fil ed with Docket Operations, M

- 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140
, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE , Washington, DC 20590

. 7



### 3

. This docket will remain open until further order of the Department

.

4 . We will serve copies of this O rder on the community and the parties listed in Appendix E

. By:

SUSAN L

. KURLAND Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available
at http://www.regulations.gov

7 In addition, copies of comments may be e

- mailed to dennis.devany@dot.gov
, brian.swanson@dot.gov , or faxed to the Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, at (202) 366

- 7638. Regardless of whether copies are faxed to the EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, all objections should be filed with Docket Operations, M

- 30 at the above address.

### Appendix A



# AREA MAP

### Appendix B

Historical Enplanements Kalaupapa, Hawaii

Year Ended Annual Enplanements 31

- Dec

- 2007 3,206 31

- Dec

- 2008 3,135 31

- Dec

- 2009 2,035 31

- Dec

- 2010 895 Source: BTS, T

- 100 Market Data

### Appendix C Page 1 of 4 Pacific Wings Service at Kalaupap a , Hawaii 

# 2007

Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed

1 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 52 42 1 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 52 40

2 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 52 40 2 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 52 40

3 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 52 40 3 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 52 40

3 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 20 15 4 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 52 40

4 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 52 40 4 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 31 31

4 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 31 31 5 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 124 86

4 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 20 15 6 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 124 74

5 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 124 88 7 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 78

6 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 124 77 8 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 77

7 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 82 9 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 79

8 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 84 10 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 78

9 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 90 79 11 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 61

10 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 80 12 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 83

11 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 90 59 1,039 807

11 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 2 2

12 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 64

12 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 9 9
1,090 847

2,129 1,654 77.7%

Source: BTS, T-100 Segment Data Yearly Totals Competition Percentage

### Appendix C Page 2 of 4 Pacific Wings Service at Kalaupapa, Hawaii 

# 2008

Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed

1 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 31 14 1 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 95

1 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 85 1 Kalaupapa, HI Kahului, HI 2 2

1 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 9 23 2 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 87 95

2 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 87 89 2 Kalaupapa, HI Kahului, HI 2 2

2 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 9 15 3 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 1 1

3 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 94 84 3 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 94 94

3 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 9 11 4 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 1 1

4 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 94 77 4 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 94 94

4 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 20 18 5 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 94 79

5 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 81 81 6 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 83

5 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 1 1 7 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 89

6 Honolulu, HI Kalaupapa, HI 1 1 8 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 1 1

6 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 83 83 8 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 85

7 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 87 9 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 1 1

7 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 1 1 9 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 82

8 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 86 10 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 2 2

9 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 90 89 10 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 87

9 Kahului, HI Kalaupapa, HI 1 1 11 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 83

10 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 85 12 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 89 88

11 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 90 85 1,110 1,064

12 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 89 84
1,162 1,100

2,272 2,164 95.2%

Source: BTS, T-100 Segment Data Yearly Totals Completion Percentage

### Appendix C Page 3 of 4 Pacific Wings Service at Kalaupapa, Hawaii 

# 2009

Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed

1 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 92 78 1 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 89 83

2 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 84 80 2 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 84 79

3 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 90 3 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 89

4 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 90 84 4 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 90 87

5 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 89 89 5 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 87 87

6 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 99 99 6 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 4 4

7 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 100 84 6 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 94 94

8 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 64 64 7 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 94 88

9 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 60 8 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 0 13

10 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 41 41 8 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 0 3

11 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 43 8 Kalaupapa, HI Kahului, HI 0 3

12 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 40 9 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 79 70

965 852 10 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 61 61

11 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 60 51

12 Kalaupapa, HI Honolulu, HI 1 1

12 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 68

926 881

1,891 1,733 91.6%

Source: BTS, T-100 Segment Data Yearly Totals Completion Percentage

### Appendix C Page 4 of 4 Pacific Wings Service at Kalaupapa, Hawaii 

# 2010

Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed Month Origin City Destination City Departures Scheduled Departures Performed

1 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 93 46 1 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 93 67

2 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 66 46 2 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 66 66

3 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 62 49 3 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 62 62

4 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 42 4 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 60 54

5 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 62 47 5 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 62 55

6 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 44 6 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 60 53

7 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 63 50 7 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 63 57

8 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 63 45 8 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 63 54

9 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 52 9 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 60 55

10 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 62 58 10 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 62 55

11 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 60 48 11 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 60 48

12 Hoolehua, HI Kalaupapa, HI 62 52 12 Kalaupapa, HI Hoolehua, HI 62 49

773 579 773 675

1,546 1,254 81.1%

Source: BTS, T-100 Segment Data Yearly Totals Completion Percentage

### Appendix D

Example of General Terms and Conditions for Essential Air Service

The carrier understands that it may forfeit its compensation for any flights that it does not operate in conformance with the terms and stipulations of the rate order, including the service plans outlined in the order and any other significant elements of the required service, without prior approval. The carrier unders tands that an aircraft take

- off and landing at its scheduled destination constitutes a completed flight; absent an explanation supporting subsidy eligibility for a flight that has not been completed, such as certain weather cancellations, only completed fl ights are considered eligible for subsidy. In addition, if the carrier does not schedule or operate its flights in full conformance with the order for a significant period, it may jeopardize its entire subsidy claim for the period in question. If the car rier contemplates any such changes beyond the scope of the order during the applicable period of these rates, it must first notify the Office of Aviation Analysis in writing and receive written approval from the Department to be ensured of full compensatio n. Should circumstances warrant, the Department may locate and select a replacement carrier to provide service on these routes. The carrier must complete all flights that can be safely operated; flights that overfly points for lack of traffic will not be compensated. In determining whether subsidy payment for a deviating flight should be adjusted or disallowed, the Department will consider the extent to which the goals of the program are met and the extent of access to the national air transportation sys tem provided to the community.

If the Department unilaterally, either partially or completely, terminates or reduces payments for service or changes service requirements at a specific location provided for under this order, then, at the end of the period for which the Department does make payments in the stipulated amounts or at the stipulated service levels, the carrier may cease to provide service to that specific location without regard to any requirement for notice of such cessation. Those adjustments in the levels of subsidy and/or service that are mutually agreed to in writing by the Department and carrier do not constitute a total or partial reduction or cessation of payment.

Subsidy contracts are subject to, and incorporate by reference, relevant statutes and Department regulations, as they may be amended from time to time. However, any such statutes, regulations, or amendments thereto shall not operate to controvert the foregoing paragraph.

Funds are not currently available for performance under this solicitation beyond [DATE] . The Department’s obligation for perform ance under this solicitation beyond [DATE] is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds from which payment for services can be made. No legal liability on the part of t he Department for any payment may arise for performance under this order beyond [DATE] , until funds are made available to the Department for performance. If funds are not made available for performance beyond [DATE] , the carrier will receive notice in wri ting by the Department.

All claims for payment must be submitted within 60 days of the last day of se rvice provided under this order.

### Appendix E

SERVICE LIST

Air Greco/Wings Air Frontier Airlines, Daniel Shurz Pacific Aviation Group, Craig Garrick Air Sunshine, Inc. Frontier Flying, Bob Hajducovich Pacific Aviation Group, Ron Rye Air Sunshine, Mirmohammad Adili Frontline Aviation Pacific Wings, Frank Ford Air West, Inc., John Raatz Gem Air, Dan Schroeder Pacific Wings, Greg Kahlstorf Air Wisconsin, Annette Daly Gem Air, JoAnn Wolters Penn Air, Danny Seybert Air Wisconsin, Jim Rankin Great Lakes Airlines, Chuck Howell Penn Air, Scott Bloomquist Airline Associates, Bill Mishk Great Lakes Airlines, Doug Voss Pinnacle Airlines, Jennifer Gammill Alaska Airlines, Jeff Cole Gulfstream, Dave Hackett Pinnacle Airlines, Megan Rosia Alaska Airlines, Sandy Sinick Gulfstream, Mickey Bowman Pinnacle Airlines, Phil Reed Allegiant Air, Brian Davis Gulfstream, T. Cooper Planemast ers, Inc., John Kessler American Airlines, Carl Nelson Homeland Security, Bill Ragan Planemasters, Inc., Paul Berliner American Eagle, Jeff Hartz Homeland Security, David Bernier Planemasters, Inc., Todd DeSimone Atlantic Southeast, Jon Lindlief Horizon Air, Dan Russo Raytheon, Mike Schiedt Atlantic Southeast, Roger Weston Horizon Air, Jennifer Thompson Saab Group, Polly Prelinger Aviation Technologies/Charter Air Transport, Jim Gallagher Horizon Air, Mike McQeen Scenic, Mary Schneider
Bemidji Aviation, Arlen Rinkenberger Horizon Air, Jeff Cole Scenic, Mitzi Daines Bemidji Aviation, Cori Rude ICEPR, Luis Irizarry Seaborne Airlines, Shawn Lewis Cape Air, Andrew Bonney Intrepid Internatl Air, Rick Eyk Seaport, Daniel Helland Cape Air, Dan Wolf Island Air Charters, Linda House SeaPort Airlines. Jim Day Cape Air, J. Flaherty Jet Air, Daniel Wolford SeaPort Airlines, Nate Vallier Classic Aviation, Tony Henderson Kenmore Air, Tim Brooks SeaPort Airlines. Rob McKinney Colgan Air, Kevin Scott McCall Aviation, Dan Scott Shuttle America, Jerry Balsano Colgan Air, Mike Colgan McCall Aviation, Michelle SkyWest, Brad Rawson CommutAir, Andy Price Mesaba, John Spanjers SkyWest, Eric Christensen CommutAir, Joel Raymond Mesaba, Max Shemesh SkyWest, Michael Thompson Consultant, Robert Silverberg Midstar Airlines, Jeffrey Fonner Sovereign Air, Bob Karns Continental, Bruce Keiner Midwest Airlines, Greg Aretakis Sovereign Air, Lois R. Barton Continental, Dan Weiss MN Aviation, Jose Maldonado Tatonduk, Robert Everts Continental, Lorry Halloway Multi Aero, Darnea Tatonduk, Robert Ragar Delta Air Lines Anthony Canitano Multi Aero, Shane Storz Tradewind, Eric Zipkin
Delta Air Lines, Dan Shuman Northern Air Cargo, David Karp Transport Azumah, Joel Anabilah

Azumah Delta Air Lines, Jeff Morgan Northern Air Cargo, Eric Van Andel Trans States, Fred Oxley Delta Air Lines, Joe Esposito Northwest Airlines, Aaron Murray Trans States, Gerry Wigmore Delta Air Lines, Sascha Vanderbellen Northwest, Tim McDonald United, Alicia Gabriel Delta Air Lines, Karen Zachary NYDC, Henok Araya United, James Starnes Delta Air Lines, Kristal Murphy OST, Brian Swanson US Airways, Benjamin Slocum
Dorado Jets OST, Dennis DeVany US Airways, Howard Kass Dorado Jets, Mark McKenna OST, Kevin Adams US Airways, Jason Reisinger
Era Aviation, Lori Goodman OST, Kevin Schlemmer Warbelows Air Ventures, Art Warbelow Executive Airlines, Kate Soled OST, Michael Martin Schuman Aviation Company Ltd., Richard Schuman Administrator, Hawaii Department of Transportation, Airports Division Administrator, Department of Health, State of Hawaii Iolani Air, RD Stewart