alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### ,vto'koul ti:J-r 

### LA-**~ve._** Tc**r:;·t~**

' I JUL 27 2il15

Abet**ll~costa,** C!er!<

tho f,·o'1 70**£>t'd~\) +k~** **~~** 

### tA-\**~~ut-f--** To 

### Ft-/'e t**~f- '~** 

## '1;-f\-c;J,·~**~ rAe-~** **tA~cf** (!..oti\_LlLISt'Ovt. of\- l-;4-LVIl tf1.s 

### /-e

## ~l( ,'('-edJ



## fti**~u** b'\..L 

## + To 9-ec f.,. 

### <ir t> ,C -J 

### k_ 1-e).

### ~**~d-e._** c:>.t C.S\

### ~-'\S n_ tA- \ 

## P**t-oc.edu..ft~**

.--:--

.

· 1 0**+~ blovtor~lf'** **~** 4d.9·6**b~** 7t4-,J**C~u--1-~** L\$)v4-e.5 /Low 

### ? e-**+-ro~JL(** 

### l

v ,f-( c ¢.-l£4. tVt.tA.**fh~re-c_**

## 1**~** 

### e 1 IA-4-o 

### r

, .. 11. -}-k-e._

IHsfiAv\.-1- C.t4u;e

### tA~( pi',A-".5

### f~e. Ct)urf. 

### w,·tl srLAvL-+ /l£--1114-+ut- 1 

### >

/hofrovL

### ~ 

### r L_re_/AUe_ Tc F."/oe_ Mo+rotA.... Tu

### Ot'c\~(' fle_ T\\

### ~1 L'ou..r+ 'Th 

### .,:-;·1-e**,f'~ ~FtkcJ,-~J.S**  tJ-C FtAc.+S

### ~J**Cc:::>t1.LI~'J\·ot/l** o..P. ttA

### ~ I( 1M

### ~ <{ r r<?c{ 

### f>u r5

### ~ <'1._¢1- To 5-e 

### cJ.. '15

### ~ 

## + [._

-L "f'e

### ~~**t:.od~** 6?

### ~**c..-~\tu--!'1141** troeec1'1.\e. 

## /lvtd .Qel' 

### s&od c

### t4<t~ v-.- 1 

### 1

.?ito 4/ 

## +**l,..~** 

### Folio '--L· IA_J;



# ::c

# . ' )



## li-?P \1 

### c (1\<.!f 

### .he _j _> 

### t

### Lt.~ J., e IMJ f\ /,/ i_ CCl 

### U-1'+ II:) Df'l{.._ 

## v- f'e 5-ftvrJwp<-fs

'f{) \**&M-i-k~di** ,9-h{ { Q\.·l-o 1**1-~ 'f"\ncl\'IA.j~**  

### t>-1-**r~fS** 

### tAU({**~~US/()vt**



# ot ttA-4J**~ ((~u1rQ.d**  J:-V\. $ee-l-: 

### <0 

### tAN

.. tl-cJ1- 

## ot tke.. T-e7tA_5

### ~~<Q_**~ C-~\JM-'1\tA-\**  

### vrot'Rdt.tre 

### tp,4-ki·"**~o c\cA-"~-**  

### t4ud 

## ro 7/up**d~lsJvrJtv** tL.e_ f'u}in_1.S

### ~-**T~t"S** tour-f-)

### ~-/-""-. UV\.. \JV**~"'l4vl ~<-\**  

### ceJ 

## rfl-v**~-** 

# Pt!je_t**\A.Jkce-r-e_~o~-e**

## 1**~N.tr4:.>e!:> L.eV\.?Id~r~dr**  Re.-\tA-k\1

### ~tto~~(o**,4lc~,~t/lA** 11**Af-},·JA~** '- 

### .p**r~s** '7kt_s Cou. r-l-**~.-tl** dtMA- 

### UJ.A-Ve to 

## Nl

'€

Mo..f..CctA ro of'.c((Q_r P-.ra_>pov{c[-Qvt-f 

### T\,-t4-\ Couc-+ \'o {.,"le**,·f~** 

## h'//l.cJ,h; FJAc..f_> tA._,_e[ CQt-t..cJ cJSrc?cA

### c9~**t-.A-~ t.u~+-"-**  

### f4.ts co--..'-"'+

### ~vl-=\.k-tY\.**1-~ tA~**  

# t+**~o cl~y.s.**  Tb

### f-.e_~{ve flr;> t5f,U-1.!> >e../-- 

### c9uj-

).--1\ 

# + 4 

### rA-t> p f 1· c lA--I !'o V\

.



# e

....**e.:~--t-;** ..Q.\ c_ta.- 

### 4'€._ (3

### ~ S>-esu \ (

### ~ 

## J: fc.J-rcc-ul() ,4lc_t4-/l4**th~f't\~"(:_~**

## 1 klt4--lor**~ h~tr~Ly** **Ce_r;~~j** }kf4../-

tA T}'4.-e_ 

### At.-t.cf'**Cef\'~c_+** 

### C..clf 

## f**c>~** 

### +ke**&-<~ec,~ do(._u~q2vd** **~L-Jb**

### A('h~kf 

### 70**~s?oq_d~11.+ +L~.** **k~u:of'£(.~l.,** 

### ""CSLLc!Jc_**14~** 

### clt"S/=r'l-cA

## cJ .e_" 

## k 

# o-f 

# + Lve.

## ~ l( z_J< 

## J i) • 

### > f 

### r • 

## d Cc ut 

### r-1-· 

## a-t' /-1 <1-l f LO<.l 

### •d-( 

## T!



## A-J.-: Z Z 

# r;- \3fot>lk(t.- 

## v{y

1 

### S+e 

## tf f>/ A,Av ,·-e_ LJ l'f 1!4_) 

### f-tfof-z__ '

f)cll \}'-l-ly 

### L3/ 

### ZOi'7
## NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 328

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

ROBERT AGUILAR

, Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

.

On a ppeal from the 117 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

B efore the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the appellate record.

On April 6

, 2021, a ppellant's counsel filed an Anders brief

, and appellant has been unable

to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief.

Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and it is hereby ORDERED that the

trial court ensure that appellant has the op portunity to fully examine the appellate recordon or before fifteen ( 15 ) days from the date this order issues

. I t is FURTHER ORDERED

the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made

available to appellant

. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Furthermore, Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the d ay the appellate

record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court

. The State shall

have twenty days thereafte r to file its response, if any

.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

13 t h day of May, 2021.
2018 ND 2

#### Joe Ramon SAUCEDO, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20170224

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Filed 1/22/2018

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Jodi A. Bass (argued), Carmell F. Matti-son (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorneys, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Joe Saucedo appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Saucedo argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because his counsel was ineffective. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district. court did not clearly err in denying Saucedo’s application.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte
EX-10.1

                               OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT


         This AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"),  effective as of January 1, 2009 (the
"Effective  Date"),  between R&R  Acquisition  V, Inc.  (the  "Corporation"),  a
corporation  organized  under  the  laws of the  State of  Delaware  and Kirk M.
Warshaw,  LLC (the "LLC"), a limited  liability company organized under the laws
of the State of New Jersey.

         WHEREAS,  the Corporation's  principal offices are located at 47 School
Avenue,  Chatham,  New  Jersey  and  such  premises  are  owned  by the LLC (the
"Principal Offices"); and

         WHEREAS,  the Corporation and the LLC wishes to enter into an agreement
for use and  occupancy  of the  Principal  Offices  and  certain  administrative
services;

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, it is agreed that:

         Effective as of the Effective Date, the Corporation  hereby agrees that
it shall pay to the LLC a quarterly occupancy and administrative services fee in
the amount of U.S.  five hundred  dollars  ($500) on each of January 1, April 1,
July 1 and October 1 until such time as this  Agreement is terminated by written
notice of either party.

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have duly executed and delivered this
Agreement effective as of the Effective Date on January 29, 2009.


                            R&R ACQUISITION V, INC.,
                             A DELAWARE CORPORATION


                            By: /s/ Arnold P. Kling
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Name: Arnold P. Kling
                            Title:   President


                            KIRK M. WARSHAW, LLC.,
                            A NEW JERSEY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY


                            By: /s/ Kirk Warshaw
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                            Name: Kirk Warshaw
                            Title: Managing Member
#### State v. Randall

107,849

11/22/13

Denied.

Unpublished
# C_2019347EN.01000301.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9019 — Mars/AniCura)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 347/03)

On 29 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9019. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9019. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. SETHY TONY SEAM

No. 82A14

Filed 21 December 2016

On writ of certiorari to review an order on a motion for appropriate relief entered on 8 August 2013 by Judge Theodore S. Royster, Jr. in Superior Court, Davidson County. On 4 September 2013, the Court of Appeals allowed the State’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the order pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(c). On 11 March 2014, the Supreme Court on its own initiative certified the case for review prior to determination in the Court of Appeals. Following oral argument on 6 May 2014, the Court on 28 January 2016 ordered supplemental briefing. Heard in the Supreme Court on 12 October 2016.

*Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.*

*Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman and Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Assistant Appellate Defenders, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *State v.*Young, _ N.C. _, _ S.E.2d _ (Dec. 21, 2016) (No. 80A14), the trial court’s order is affirmed, and this case is remanded for resentencing.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
|    |                                                                                                           |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Barracuda Networks, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
|   | By: |   | /s/ David Faugno |
|   |   |   | David Faugno |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
No. 11-9810.

No. 11-10022.

No. 11-10163.

No. 11-11115.

No. 12-5084.

No. 12-5274.

No. 12-5314.

#### Simmons *v.*Braverman, West *v.*Oklahoma, Davis *v.*Rozum, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Somerset, et al., Williams *v.*Edenfield, Warden, Tenerelli *v.*United States, Robinson *v.*Connell, Superintendent, Oneida Correctional Facility, et al., Sangalaza *v.*Wells Fargo National Bank,

*ante,*p. 829;

*ante,*p. 830;

*ante,*p. 835;

*ante,*p. 880;

*ante,*p. 894;

*ante,*p. 904; and

*ante,*p. 906. Petitions for rehearing denied.
242P16

#### State v. Greggory G. Mosher, Jr.

1. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR

2. Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appoint Counsel

1. Dismissed

2. Dismissed as moot
|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                         
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                           
|View History:                                                            
|                                                                         
|Texas Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         
|                                                                         
|Texas Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                         

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 135,990 | 140,186 | 115,157 | 107,991 | 120,436 | 122,014 | 114,344 | 125,757 | 144,134 | 159,113
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 155,631 | 173,399 | 180,003 | 184,258 | 196,463 | 200,233 | 238,897 | 263,397 | 296,412 | 282,462
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 270,436 | 247,750 | 279,912 | 286,253 | 355,165 | 388,305 | 409,276 | 254,337 | 241,626 | 240,533
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 279,981 | 284,557 | 183,118 | 166,328 | 143,891 | 262,174 | 250,813 | 204,334 | 209,947 | 224,046
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 182,667 | 216,292 | 210,859 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Matthew TROTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 5D17-115

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Decision filed September 5, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bre-vard County, James H. Earp, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2019027EN.01001301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 22.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/13 |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to start winding-up proceedings in respect of Qudos Insurance A/S

(Publication made in accordance with Article 280 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II))

(2019/C 27/09)

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Insurance undertaking | | | | --- | | Qudos Insurance A/S | | Købmagergade 22, 3.3 | | 1150 Copenhagen K | | DENMARK | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of decision | 20 December 2018, Bankruptcy |
| Competent authorities | | | | --- | | Maritime and Commercial Court | | Amaliegade 35, 2. | | 12 56 Copenhagen K | | DENMARK | |
| Supervisory authority | None |
| Administrator appointed | | | | --- | | Boris K. Frederiksen, | | Vester Farimagsgade 23, | | 1606 Copenhagen V | | Denmark | |
| Applicable law | Denmark. Danish Bankruptcy Code §17 |

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/Aof Synergy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Gary S. Jacob, as President and Acting Chief Executive Officerhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

August 11, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Gary S. Jacob        |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Gary S. Jacob            |
|   | President and Acting CEO |

 

----
## Swanson , Bria n (OST) DOT - O^V - l^^f/ " I TU From : Goin g Place s [goingplacestrvl@hotmail.com ] Sent : Tuesday , Apri l 20 , 201 0 12:3 5 P M To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Swanson , Bria n (OST ) Subject : Maniste e Blacke rEssentia l Ai rServic e Apri l 20 , 201 0 Dea rDenni s DeVan y& Bria n Swanson : W e attende d th e Airpor tAuthorit yBoar d meetin g o n Apri l 12 , 201 0 a tth e Maniste e Blacke rAirpor tregardin g Grea tLake s Aviatio n a s th e connmercia l carrie rou t o fManistee . W e realiz e ther e hav e bee n sonn e complaint s regardin g th e servic e wit h cancelle d flight s du e t o mechanica l difficulties , employe e problem s and , o fcourse , th e weather . W e a s th e loca l trave l agenc yar e ver y awar e o fthos e complaint s fro m unhapp ytravelers . However , wit h al l th e problem s involve d w e stil l believ e tha tGrea tLake s Aviatio n i s i s th e bes tprovide r an d valu e fo rManiste e Blacke rAirport . W e believ e Milwauke e a s a hub , i s a fa rbette roptio n tha n Chicag o Midway . Whe n peopl e trave l tw o thing s ar e a priority , convenienc e an d price . Becaus e Grea tLake s i s offerin g a 4 cit ypackag e a s a n al l o rnothin g option , w e fee l tha tther e woul d b e mor e plane s i n th e are a t o hel p remed ycancellation s an d delay s i fnecessar ywit h backup s nearb yan d available . Milwauke e i s a grea thu b a s i ti s no tto o larg e o rno tto o small . Connection s ou to fMilwauke e includ e mos t majo rcarrier s wit h cod e share s an d baggag e agreements . Wit h cod e share s th e price s ar e usuall ya goo d value , whic h al l traveler s wan tthes e days . Milwaul<e e offer s connection s wit h nonstop s t o severa l majo rcitie s i n th e Unite d States . It' s carrier s includ e United , U.S . Airways , American , Continental , Delta , Midwest , AirTran , an d Frontie rAirline s plu s charte rflights . Milwauke e i s als o a facilitato ro fFunje tvacation s an d Appl e Vacation s alon g wit h Delt a Drea m Vacations , an d America n an d Unite d Vacation s packages . Mos to fthes e ca n wor k

wit h Grea tLake s t o ge tpeopl e t o an d fro m man ydestinations . Chicag o Midwa yi s a smal l airpor ti n compariso n t o Milwaukee . Chicag o Midwa yha s ver ylimite d flight s an d carriers . Delta , Midwest , Frontier , AirTra n an d Southwes toperat e ou to fMidwa yan d onl ya fe wflight s t o majo r destination s ar e nonstop . Wit h thi s i n mind , i tmean s anothe rtransfe ro f plane s an d longe rtrave l time s fo rth e customer . Th e exceptio n t o thi s i s Southwest , bu ttha tpose s problem s i fpeopl e woul d wan tt o chec k luggage ; a s Southwes tha s n o baggag e agreement s wit h an yothe rairline . Wit h thos e limitation s i n min d w e fee l Chicag o Midwa yi s a poo rchoic e o f ai rservic e fo rManiste e an d suppor tGrea tLake s Aviatio n a s ou ressentia l ai rcarrier . Respectfull ySubmitted , Kelli e A . Mowry , Cynthi a L . Kaminsk i an d Patt i K . Uhazi e Owners/Agent s Goin g Place s Tour s & Travel , Manistee , M I Th e Ne wBus yi s no tth e to o busy . Combin e al l you re-mai l account s wit h Hotmail . Ge tbusy .
# C_2019068EN.01002801.xml

| 21.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/28

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(2019/C 68/08)

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will expire.

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (2).

| Product | Country of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Electrolytic manganese dioxides (i.e. manganese dioxides produced through an electrolytic process) not heat-treated after the electrolytic process, currently falling within CN code ex 2820 10 00 (TARIC code 2820100010 ) | The Republic of South Africa | Definitive anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 191/2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain manganese dioxides originating in the Republic of South Africa following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009
  (OJ L 59, 28.2.2014, p. 7) | 1.3.2019 |

Product

Country of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

Electrolytic manganese dioxides (i.e. manganese dioxides produced through an electrolytic process) not heat-treated after the electrolytic process, currently falling within CN code ex 2820 10 00 (TARIC code 2820100010 )

The Republic of South Africa

Definitive anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 191/2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain manganese dioxides originating in the Republic of South Africa following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009

(OJ L 59, 28.2.2014, p. 7)

1.3.2019

---

(1)  OJ C 203, 13.6.2018, p. 17.

(2)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(3)  The measure will expire at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

---