alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Ohio Natural Gas Vented and Flared  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Ohio Natural Gas Vented and Flared  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1960's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1970's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 330    | 0      | 0     
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      |       
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
#### Brent NICHOLSON, et al., petitioners, v. THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC., et al.

No. 17-772.

March 5, 2018.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 10.9


CLARIFICATION AGREEMENT


CyberOptics Corporation, a Minnesota
Corporation (the “Company”) and Jeffrey Bertelsen (“Executive”) have previously entered into a Severance
Pay Agreement dated May 19, 2008, as amended (the “Agreement”) and wish to clarify the definition of “termination
of employment” for all purposes of such agreement. Accordingly, the Company and Executive agree that, for all purposes of
the Agreement, “termination” or “termination of employment” shall mean a “separation from service”
as that term is defined in Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.


The Company and Executive have executed this
Clarification Agreement, as of December 31, 2011.


 


	CyberOptics Corporation	 	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By 	/s/ Kathleen P. Iverson	 	/s/ Jeffrey Bertelsen	 
	 	Its 	Chief Executive Officer	 	Jeffrey Bertelsen
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial informatin extracted from the
Company's Financial Statements as of March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000061004                        
<NAME>                                       Lynch Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1000
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                            16,708
<SECURITIES>                                       1,287
<RECEIVABLES>                                     44,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                         736
<INVENTORY>                                       31,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 149,738 
<PP&E>                                           207,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                    70,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   452,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            136,769
<BONDS>                                          244,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,139
<OTHER-SE>                                        23,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     452,621
<SALES>                                           95,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  95,123
<CGS>                                             83,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     91,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 4,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (16,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       5,533
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (10,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (551)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (160)
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (10,991)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (7.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (7.75)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF CHAPARRAL ENERGY, INC



|                              |  |                           |  |                                   
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary            |  | Jurisdiction of Formation |  | Effective Ownership               
|Chaparral Resources, L.L.C.   |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Chaparral Real Estate, L.L.C. |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Chaparral
CO2, L.L.C.         |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|NorAm Petroleum, L.L.C.       |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|CEI Pipeline, L.L.C.          |  | Texas                     |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.      |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|CEI Acquisition, L.L.C.       |  | Delaware                  |  | Chaparral Energy, L.L.C.  100%   
|Green Country Supply, Inc.    |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Chaparral Biofuels, L.L.C.    |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Oklahoma Ethanol L.L.C.       |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Biofuels, L.L.C.  100% 
|Chaparral Exploration, L.L.C. |  | Delaware                  |  | Chaparral Energy, Inc.  100%     
|Roadrunner Drilling, L.L.C.   |  | Oklahoma                  |  | Chaparral Resources, L.L.C.  100%
282P16-2

#### Jeremy Bruns and Jenny Bruns v. Rhonda Bryant, Dalton Bryant, Sr., Dalton Bryant, Jr., Pat McCrory, as Governor of North Carolina, Frank Perry, as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety, Anthony Tata, as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Transportation, Veronica McClain, USAA, and State of North Carolina

Pits’ *Pro Se*Motion to Reconsider PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31(a) and *Writ of Mandamus*Under Rule 22

Denied
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 51

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                       control Federal spending.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2011

Mr. Akin introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                       control Federal spending.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled   (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed 18 
percent of the gross domestic product of the United States for the most 
recent calendar year ending before the beginning of such fiscal year, 
unless two-thirds of each House of Congress shall provide for a 
specific increase of outlays above this amount. Total outlays shall 
include all outlays of the United States Government, except for those 
for repayment of debt principal.
    ``Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this 
article by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 3. No court shall have jurisdiction to consider any claim 
or question arising out of this amendment or any authority to issue any 
judgment, decree, or other remedial order relating thereto.
    ``Section 4. This article shall take effect beginning with the 
fifth fiscal year beginning after the ratification of this article.''.
                                 <all>
```
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 27 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States restoring 

religious freedom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2011 

Mr. STEARNS introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States restoring religious freedom. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all 

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several 

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission 

9 for ratification: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HJ 27 IH 

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. To secure the people’s right to acknowl3 edge God according to the dictates of conscience: The peo4 ple’s right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, 

5 heritage, or traditions on public property, including 

6 schools, shall not be infringed. The Government shall not 

7 require any person to join in prayer or other religious ac8 tivity, initiate or designate school prayers, discriminate 

9 against religion, or deny equal access to a benefit on ac10 count of religion.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

        I, Michael S. Dunlap, certify that:

        1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Nelnet Student
Loan Trust 2002-1;

        2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day covered by this annual report;

        3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
servicing agreement, or similar agreements, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

        4. Based upon my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

        5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
agreement, that is included in these reports.




Date:  March 31, 2006            /s/ Michael S. Dunlap
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                     Michael S. Dunlap
                                     President
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)
                                     Nelnet Student Loan Funding Management
                                     Corporation, Manager and Special Member of
                                     the Registrant

                                       5
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-16353

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 9:16-cv-82169-BB

DAVID MEJIA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

 versus

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a Corporation,

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(August 8, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 1 of 10 
2

David Mejia brought this case in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, 

Florida, by filing a two-count complaint. Count I alleged that Ocwen Loan 

Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), did not provide an adequate response to Korte & 

Wortman’s request under 12 C.F.R. § 1024.36(d)(2)(i)(A). It was inadequate 

because: “Defendant did respond to the RFI, however, Defendant’s response was 

insufficient in that it failed to include a phone number for the investor of the 

subject loan.” Comp. ¶ 17. Count I sought actual damages and attorney’s fees. 

Count II alleged that Ocwen “has shown a pattern of disregard to the requirement 

imposed . . . by the Federal Reserve Regulation X,” Comp. ¶ 35, and sought 

statutory damages and attorney’s fees.

Ocwen removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida, and moved to dismiss it for failure to state a claim for relief. 

Mejia did not respond to Ocwen’s motion as required by the Court’s local rules, so 

the Court took the motion under advisement without the benefit of any explanation 

from Mejia’s counsel as to why Ocwen’s motion should not be granted. In a 

comprehensive through-going order, the Court granted Ocwen’s motion to dismiss.

Mejia appeals, arguing that the District Court erred in holding that Ocwen, 

as servicer, was not obligated to provide a phone number for the owner of the loan. 

We find no merit in the argument, and accordingly affirm for the reasons stated in 

the District Court’s dispositive order. Because we anticipate that Mejia’s claims 

Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 2 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 3 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 4 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 5 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 6 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 7 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 8 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 9 of 10 
Case: 16-16353 Date Filed: 08/08/2017 Page: 10 of 10
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ISIAC FULTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2414

[January 26, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 06001647CFBXMX.

Isiac Fulton, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                 
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History: Annual                                           
|View History:                                                  
|                                                               
|Alabama--onshore Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               
|                                                               
|Alabama--onshore Natural Gas Repressuring  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                               

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        | 29,996 | 31,179 | 33,961 | 30,949 | 22,601 | 17,724 | 14,002 | 13,793
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 13,988 | 12,758 | 10,050 | 4,062  | 1,307  | 478    | 301    | 311    | 475    | 783   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 736    | 531    | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA     | NA    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | NA     | NA     | NA     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephanie A. Carnes,Vice President-Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of Chaparral Energy, Inc., certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A ofChaparral Energy, Inc.; and 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Date: April 28, 2020 

 
By:       
/s/ Stephanie A. Carnes
 Stephanie A. Carnes Vice President-Corporate Controller**
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1031** 

KENNETH LEE HOLBERT, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:15

- cv
- 04615

- HMH )

Submitted : September 29 , 2016 Decided: October 3, 2016

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth L. Holbert, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth A. Davis, Shawn Davis Eubanks, BOYKIN DAVIS & SMILEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Lee Holbert, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendat ion of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Holbert v. Greenville Tech.

Coll. , No. 6:15

- cv
- 04615

- HMH (D.S.C. Dec. 9, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order filed, April 6, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00088-CV

____________

MARCUS HILES, Appellant

V.

ARNIE & COMPANY, P.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-42061

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 6, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. On March 6, 2012, this court granted Carmen Miller's motion for extension to file the 

record on or before April 4, 2012. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the 

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Carmen Miller, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order; NO FURTHER EXTENSION WILL BE 

ENTERTAINED. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Carmen Miller does not timely 
file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
#### State v. Sharp

27927

06/05/2017

' Affirmed (LEL)