alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019358EN.01002001.xml

| 22.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/20

---

Corrigendum to Annual Report 2018

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 350 of 16 October 2019
  )

(2019/C 358/10)

On the cover page and on page 3:

for:

‘Annual Report 2018’,

read:

‘EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN

Annual Report 2018’.

---
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 15, 2012 |   | /s/ R. LaDuane Clifton |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                     |   | Name:                  | R. LaDuane Clifton |
|                     |   | Title:                 | Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
#### Howard A. Zipser, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles E. Pound, as Commissioner of Parks of the County of Westchester, Defendant.

*City*Court of White Plains,

February 4, 1972.

*Howard A. Zipser,*plaintiff in person. *John Mead, County Attorney (Arthur Connick*of counsel), for defendant.

Alfred Olsen, J.

This is a $96 small claims lawsuit against the Westchester County Commissioner of Parks. The plaintiff, Howard Alan Zipser, is suing the Commissioner for certain art works destroyed without the owner’s permission.

The County of Westchester now makes a motion to dismiss this lawsuit because Mr. Zipser did not comply with the 90-day notice provision of subdivision 1 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.

The effect of section 50-e is unfair in that it creates two separate and distinct classes of plaintiffs. The first class is the private plaintiff who sues a private defendant. This plaintiff is a lucky plaintiff because he has three years in which to assert a negligence claim. Section 50-e créates a second subsidiary class of plaintiffs who must file their formal notice of claim against the county within 90 days, otherwise their claim is totally defeated and barred regardless of its merits.

. This is not justice. In the United States there should not be any second-class plaintiffs just as there should not be any second-class citizens. The United States Constitution guarantees equal protection of the laws to all. Enforcement of the short-time limit of section 50-e is unequal protection. It gives a municipality an unfair advantage over a private litigant.

This is a denial of due process and equal protection of the laws under the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York.

Everyone must stand before the -court without fear or favor. Everyone must stand before the law without an artificial cloak of a special short-time limit.

Therefore, this court holds that subdivision 1 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law is unconstitutional as being *153repugnant and contrary to the provisions of the New York State Constitution and the United States Constitution.

In these modern' times, no government should have rights superior to the people.

In the sports of baseball and basketball there is only one set of rules for the players on both sides. So should it be with the law.

"When a law is unfair, arbitrary and gives only one-sided protection, it is not a true reflection of justice and good government. Such a law should and will not stand.

The motion of the county to dismiss the complaint is denied.

This case is set down for trial on the merits for February 23, 1.972 at 8:00 p.m.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

In connection with the Sterling Mining Company (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James N. Meek, Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James N. Meek
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | James N. Meek                             
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sterling Mining Company and will be retained by Sterling Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  Company's
Financial  Statements  as of June 30, 2000 and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial information.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000061004
<NAME>                        Lynch Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollar

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Apr-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          19,742
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   31,660
<ALLOWANCES>                    423
<INVENTORY>                     33,364
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                94,416
<PP&E>                          67,458
<DEPRECIATION>                  24,964
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  166,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           65,092
<BONDS>                         58,952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        5,139
<OTHER-SE>                      15,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    166,511
<SALES>                         53,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                53,008
<CGS>                           45,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   51,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (686)
<INCOME-TAX>                    15
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             140
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 991
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,131
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.75



</TABLE>
# C_2019376EN.01000801.xml

| 6.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 376/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 376/8

---

Community Plant Variety Office

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2018

(2019/C 376/08)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

https://cpvo.europa.eu/en/about-us/finance-and-budget

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 511 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 511

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifices made by 
 the Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers who have been 
                 killed or injured in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 2010

Mr. Leahy submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifices made by 
 the Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers who have been 
                 killed or injured in the line of duty.

Whereas the well-being of the people of the United States is preserved and 
        enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law 
        enforcement personnel;
Whereas more than 900,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        serve the people of the United States as guardians of the peace;
Whereas peace officers are on the front lines in protecting the schools and 
        schoolchildren of the United States;
Whereas in 2009, 116 peace officers across the United States were killed in the 
        line of duty;
Whereas Congress should strongly support initiatives to reduce violent crime and 
        increase the factors that contribute to the safety of law enforcement 
        officers, including--

    (1) equipment of the highest quality and modernity;

    (2) increased availability and use of bullet-resistant vests;

    (3) improved training; and

    (4) advanced emergency medical care;

Whereas the names of 18,983 Federal, State, and local law enforcement officers 
        who lost their lives in the line of duty protecting the people of the 
        United States are engraved on the National Law Enforcement Officers 
        Memorial in Washington, District of Columbia;
Whereas in 1962, President John F. Kennedy designated May 15 as National Peace 
        Officers Memorial Day;
Whereas, on May 15, 2010, more than 20,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in Washington, District of Columbia, to join with the families of 
        recently fallen comrades to honor those comrades and all others who went 
        before the peace officers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commemorates and acknowledges the dedication and 
        sacrifices made by the Federal, State, and local law 
        enforcement officers who have been killed or injured in the 
        line of duty;
            (2) recognizes May 15, 2010, as ``National Peace Officers 
        Memorial Day''; and
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to observe 
        that day with appropriate ceremony, solemnity, appreciation, 
        and respect.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0200]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Entitled Sealed 
Bidding

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA.

ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding reinstatement 
to a previously approved OMB clearance (3090-0200).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Office of Acquisition Policy has submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and 
approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection 
requirement concerning Sealed Bidding.

DATES: Comment due date: June 22, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Matera, Office of GSA Acquisition 
Policy, (202) 501-1224.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect 
of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing 
this burden, should be submitted to: Edward Springer, GSA Desk Officer, 
Room 3235, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503, and to Marjorie Ashby, General 
Services Administration (MVP), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Purpose

    The GSA is requesting the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to 
reinstate information collection, 3090-0200, Sealed Bidding. The 
information requested regarding an offeror's monthly production 
capability is needed to make progressive awards to ensure coverage of 
stock items.

B. Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 20; annual responses: 20; average hours per response: 
.10; burden hours: 3.3.
    Copy of proposal: A copy of this proposal may be obtained from the 
GSA Acquisition Policy Division (MVP), Room 4011, GSA Building, 1800 F 
Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, or by telephoning (202) 501-3822, or 
by faxing your request to (202) 501-3341.

    Dated: April 15, 1998.
Ida M. Ustad,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 98-10639 Filed 4-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-M
# Meeting Summary

Topic: Meeting with Oil and Gas Industry Associations

Date: December 6, 2011

Attendees: Mary Smith, Jan Goodwin, Robert Wood, James Covington, Erik Helm, Brian D’Amico, Jan Matuszko, Marla Smith, Tom Born, Ahmar Siddiqui, Lisa Biddle, Cuc Schroeder, William Swietlik (EPA/OW/OST); Scott Wilson, Jan Pickerel (EPA/OW/OWM); Richard Witt (EPA/OGC)

Matt Kellogg, Lee Fuller (IPAA) ; Amy Farrell (ANGA) ; Roger Claff (API) ; Alby Modiano (USOGA) ; Mark Himmelstein (NES) ; Gerry Jacob (PNR) ; Bruce Tho mpson , by phone (AXPC) ; Dennis Latham

, by phone (CMAA)

A meeting was held with representatives from the coalbed methane (CBM) and shale gas extraction (SGE) industries. The following items came up during the coalbed methane portion of the meeting.

**•** Polluta nt variability

– CBM produced water varies significantly in quality over the life of a well. This caused an issue for an operator that installed a reserve osmosis system to treat the water. Since it was designed for certain TDS concentrations in the influe nt, it failed to function properly when those values were not representative of the actual water entering the system.

**•** Prevalence of hydraulic fracturing

– Hydraulic fracturing is commonly applied in certain CBM ba s ins , including the Raton Basin and the Bla ck Warrior Basin. In these cases it is used for vertical drilling (rather than horizontal like in SGE). This fracturing is mainly done with nitrogen foam. The fracturing flowback water represents a very small fraction of the total wastewater produced over the life of a CBM well (in one example from the Black Warrior basin, it was 0.6 percent). An average fracturing job in the Raton Basin might use 1,000

- 1,500 barrels of water, that same well could be producing 1,000 barrels of water per day when operating.

**•** Grouped produced water treatment

– Centralized waste treatment facilities are commonly built for groups of CBM wells (possibly 500

- 1000 wells that are geographically near to each other). In some cases these waters require little treatment beyond chloride r emoval.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7281

HAYWOOD WILLIAMS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ALLENWOOD, PENNSYLVANIA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-931) Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: February 15, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on August 31, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on September 2, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Haywood Williams, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Warden, FCI Allenwood , No. CA-98-931 (E.D. Va. Sept. 2, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 17-1192 

SIGNS FOR JESUS; HILLSIDE BAPTIST CHURCH, 

Plaintiffs, Appellants, 

v. 

TOWN OF PEMBROKE, NH; PEMBROKE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; 

EVERETT HODGE, Code Enforcement Officer, Town of Pembroke, in 

both his individual and official capacities, 

Defendants, Appellees. 

_____________________ 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion of this Court, issued on October 7, 2020, is 

amended as follows: 

On page 21, line 4, replace "only reflect that fact that" 

with "only reflect the fact that." 

On page 33, fn. 10, line 9, replace "who" with "that".
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 43 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.43
                                        Agreed to April 14, 2011        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Friday, April 
15, 2011, or Saturday, April 16, 2011, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Monday, May 2, 2011, or until the time 
of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses or adjourns 
on any day from Thursday, April 14, 2011, through Friday, April 29, 
2011, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, May 2, 2011, or such other time on that day as may be 
specified in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any 
reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, or their respective designees, acting jointly after 
consultation with the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority 
Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House and the 
Senate, respectively, to reassemble at such place and time as they may 
designate if, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Illinois Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Illinois Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |        |        | -10,579 | -11,813 | -10,157 | -10,112 | -7,372 | -5,291 | 1,277  | 1,396 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 596    | 366    | 247     | 254     | 253     | 258     | 234    | 31     | 139    | 140   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 147    | 150    | 133     | 126     | 121     | 120     | 123    | 1,346  | 1,151  | 1,412 
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 1,357  | 1,078  | 2,125   | 2,887   | 1,882   | 2,038   | 2,141  | 2,089  | 2,425  | 2,112 
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1,812  | 1,609  | 1,974   |         |         |         |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024