alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Con. Res. 16 Agreed to May 12, 2011

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven 

Concurrent Resolution 

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 

SECTION 1. USE OF CAPITOL GROUNDS FOR SOAP BOX DERBY RACES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Greater Washington Soap Box Derby 

Association (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘sponsor’’) shall 

be permitted to sponsor a public event, soap box derby races (in 

this resolution referred to as the ‘‘event’’), on the Capitol Grounds. 

(b) DATE OF EVENT.—The event shall be held on June 18, 

2011, or on such other date as the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of 

the Senate jointly designate. 

SEC. 2. TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Under conditions to be prescribed by the 

Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board, the event 

shall be— 

(1) free of admission charge and open to the public; and 

(2) arranged not to interfere with the needs of Congress. 

(b) EXPENSES AND LIABILITIES.—The sponsor shall assume full 

responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all activities 

associated with the event. 

SEC. 3. EVENT PREPARATIONS. 

Subject to the approval of the Architect of the Capitol, the 

sponsor is authorized to erect upon the Capitol Grounds such stage, 

sound amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment as may be required for the event. 

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS. 

The Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police Board 

are authorized to make such additional arrangements as may be 

required to carry out the event. 

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. 

The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 

restrictions contained in section 5104(c) of title 40, United States 

Code, concerning sales, advertisements, displays, and solicitations 
H. Con. Res. 16—2 

on the Capitol Grounds, as well as other restrictions applicable 

to the Capitol Grounds, with respect to the event. 

Attest: 

Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Secretary of the Senate.
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)    
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Utah Dry Natural Gas Production (Million Cubic Feet)    
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 90,325  | 58,978  | 70,439  | 79,531  | 79,874  | 74,762  | 80,135  | 101,787
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 128,296 | 130,425 | 159,442 | 212,101 | 257,078 | 227,611 | 239,797 | 239,267 | 265,539 | 251,207
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 256,490 | 272,534 | 271,387 | 264,654 | 274,588 | 298,408 | 345,409 | 373,680 | 430,286 | 435,673
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 422,067 | 442,615 | 474,756 | 455,454 | 435,893 | 401,722 | 352,437 | 304,266 | 284,264 | 262,157
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 233,215 | 230,784 | 249,719 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
340P16

#### State v. Alfred Lee Cooper

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion for PDR (COAP16-192)

Dismissed
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 15, 2017

Order 

Clerk

September 15, 2017

156301(4)

BRYAN NEWLAND, Plaintiff,

SC: 156301

v AGC: 0346-15

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant to extend the time for filing 

its response to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The response will 

be accepted for filing if submitted on or before September 22, 2017.
158P06-8

#### State v. Derrick D. Boger

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Appeal an Consolidation of Sentences (COAP16-234)

Dismissed
No. 12-6518.

#### Baez *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
2018 ND 5

#### Travis JOSE, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Terra JOSE, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170193

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Filed 1/22/2018

Kelsey L. Hankey, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Terra Jose appeals from a judgment and amended judgment awarding Travis Jose primary residential responsibility of the parties’ child. Terra Jose argues the district court’s decision to award Travis Jose primary residential responsibility should be reversed because it is clear, on the entire record, that a mistake has been made. We conclude the court’s award of primary residential responsibility to Travis Jose was not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J.

*900Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte
|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                            
|View History:                                             
|                                                          
|No chart available.                                       
|No chart available.                                       
|                                                          
|                                                          
|Oregon Natural Gas Vented and Flared  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | -      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE
NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         122,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,197<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,487)
<INVENTORY>                                    155,154<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               502,762
<PP&E>                                         367,224
<DEPRECIATION>                               (173,867)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 852,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,164
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,407
<OTHER-SE>                                     667,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   852,745
<SALES>                                        829,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               829,288
<CGS>                                          445,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  445,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               274,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                112,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,508
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,013
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT IS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBTS AND RETURNS AND ALLOWANCES
<F2>AMOUNT IS NET OBSOLESCENCE RESERVES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
405P16

#### State v. Antonio Freeman

Defs Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of Superior Court, Northampton County

Denied
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 09-0914

IN RE  SMITH/ENRON COGENERATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND RAYTHEON-EBASCO OVERSEAS LIMITED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ emergency motion for temporary relief, filed November 2, 2009, is granted.  The order dated August 27, 2009, in Cause No. 09-09-00085-CV, styled *In re  Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies*, in the Ninth Court of Appeals, and all trial court proceedings in [trial court – 58th, Jefferson County, etc.] specifically related to the August 27, 2009 order, are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this November 13, 2009.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                          
|View History:                                           
|                                                        
|No chart available.                                     
|No chart available.                                     
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Virginia Natural Gas Repressuring   (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                        

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|2000's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        | 0      |        |        | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    Notice is hereby given that on March 31, 1998, a proposed Consent 
Decree was lodged with the United States District Court for the 
District of Alaska in United States v. Union Oil Co., A97-397 CIV (JWS) 
(D. Alaska). The proposed Consent Decree settles claims asserted by the 
United States at the request of the United States Environmental 
Protection Agency (``EPA'') in a complaint filed on October 7, 1997. 
The United States filed its complaint pursuant to Section 113 of the 
Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(b). The complaint 
requested the assessment of civil penalties and injunctive relief 
against defendant Union Oil Company of California d.b.a. Unocal 
(``Unocal'') for the following: (1) Violations of the CAA's prevention 
of significant deterioration (``PSD'') program as set forth in Part C 
of Title I, 42 U.S.C. 7471 et seq., and in the regulations promulgated 
thereunder, 40 CFR 52.21; and (2) violations of conditions contained in 
state permit conditions issued under the federally enforceable Alaska 
State Implementation Plan. The United States alleges that the 
violations occurred in connection with the modification and operation 
of equipment at Unocal's ammonia and urea processing facility in Kenai, 
Alaska.
    Under the proposed Consent Decree, Unocal will pay to the United 
States a $550,000 civil penalty. In addition, Unocal will spend more 
than $6.6 million to install a Supplemental Environmental Project 
ammonia flare and scrubber system. Unocal also will monitor the 
combustion efficiency of its equipment and will perform specified 
injunctive relief to comply with the Clean Air Act and the Alaska State 
Implementation Plan.
    The Department of Justice will receive written comments relating to 
the proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this notice. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and 
should refer to United States v. Union Oil Co., DOJ #90-5-2-1-2079. The 
proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Region 10 Office of EPA, 
7th Floor Records Center, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. A copy 
of the Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005 (202) 624-0892. In requesting copies, please enclose a check 
in the amount of $9.50 (25 cents per page) payable to the ``Consent 
Decree Library.''
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 98-10431 Filed 4-20-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
# C_2019242EN.01000101.xml

| 18.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/1

---

Notice for the attention of persons subject to the travel restrictions provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali

(2019/C 242/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons designated in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2019/1216 (2), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali.

On 10 July 2019, the United Nations Committee established by paragraph 9 of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2374 (2017) approved the addition of five persons to the list of persons subject to the travel ban set out in paragraphs 1 to 3 of Resolution 2374 (2017).

The persons concerned may submit at any time a request to the UN Committee established pursuant to paragraph 9 of UNSCR 2374 (2017), together with any supporting documentation, for the decision to include those persons onto the UN list to be reconsidered. Such request should be sent to the following address:

| United Nations — Focal point for delisting |
| --- |
| Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch |
| Room S-3055 E |
| New York, NY 10017 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

United Nations — Focal point for delisting

Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch

Room S-3055 E

New York, NY 10017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

See for more information at: https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/sites/www.un.org.sc.suborg/files/2374_mali_committee_guidelines_en.pdf

Further to the UN decision, the Council of the European Union has determined that the travel restrictions provided for in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 should apply to those persons.

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

Your attention is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 251, 29.9.2017, p. 23.

(2)  OJ L 192, 18.7.2019, p. 26.

---
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 72 (Wednesday, April 15, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 18408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5996-1]


Open Meeting of the Environmental Financial Advisory Board on May 
5, 1998

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will hold an 
open meeting on a proposed Environmental Bond Guaranty program for the 
New Independent States of the former Soviet Union (NIS). This program 
would create a $100 million fund to enhance the credit of municipal 
bonds issued in the NIS by guarantying financial obligations undertaken 
by NIS regional or local governments (or those formally acting on 
behalf of such governments) for capital projects providing 
environmental infrastructure that serve the general public. Types of 
environmental infrastructure projects covered may include, but not be 
limited to, drinking water purification or distribution, wastewater 
collection or treatment, solid or hazardous disposal waste, the 
efficient generation or use of energy, and air pollution abatement.
    The meeting is scheduled for May 5, 1998 in the Zenger Room at the 
National Press Club Building, 526 14th St., NW., 13th Floor, 
Washington, DC. The meeting will run from 9:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m.
    EFAB is a federally chartered advisory board that provides analysis 
and advice to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on 
environmental finance issues. EFAB has been asked by the EPA's Office 
of International Activities to review and comment on the guaranty fund 
concept. As part of EFAB's review, this meeting will solicit public 
comment and facilitate discussion of the best approaches to encourage 
the financing of environmental projects in the NIS.
    A draft feasibility study on the Environmental Bond Guaranty 
program is available on EPA's web site at <a href="http://www.epa.gov/efinpage/
partcont.htm">http://www.epa.gov/efinpage/
partcont.htm</a>. Summaries of the study in hard copy form are available by 
contacting the numbers listed below. Written comments are welcome at 
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Finance 
Program, 401 M St. SW., Mail Code 2731R, Washington, DC 20460.
    Several invited speakers will make presentations and the public is 
welcome, but seating is limited. Parties who wish to provide remarks 
should contact Michael Segal at (202) 564-2211 or Tim McProuty at (202) 
564-4996 of the Environmental Finance Program.

    Dated: April 9, 1998.
Michael Ryan,
Comptroller.
[FR Doc. 98-10003 Filed 4-14-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M