alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Patent

## Title
Rock drilling machine

## Abstract

A rock drilling machine has a housing (1), a hammer piston (2) movable to-and-fro in the housing, a drilling tool (3), and a guide (4) for the drilling tool. The guide (4) consists at the surface against the drilling tool (3) of polyethyleneterephthalate.

## Background
The present invention relates to a rock drilling machine and more particularly to a rock drilling machine provided with a special guide for the drilling tool.
In previously known rock drilling machines one uses a guide for the drilling tool made of a bronze material. A problem with this solution is that there often occurs seizure between the bronze guide and the drilling tool which is made of steel. This then results in cracks and breakage of the drilling tool.
The present invention, which is defined in the subsequent claim, aims at avoiding the above mentioned problem. This is achieved by making the guide with a surface against the drilling tool consisting of polyethyleneterephthalate.
An embodiment of the invention is described below with reference to the accompanying drawing which shows a rock drilling machine according to the invention, partly in section.


The rock drilling machine shown in the drawing comprises a housing 1 in which a hammer piston 2 is movable to-and-fro to exert a drilling tool 3 to impacts. Only the rear part of the drilling tool, the shank adapter, is shown. The shank adapter is provided with a thread 5 for connection of the rest of the drilling tool and a cog-shaped part 6 for rotating the drilling tool. In the front part of the rock drilling machine a guide 4 for the drilling tool is arranged. The guide 4 is made of polyethyleneterephthalate. It is, however, sufficient to make the surface against the drilling tool 3 of polyethyleneterephthalate. The guide 4 is provided with a number of radial bores 7 and adjacent the bores longitudinal grooves 8. By means of these one obtains a leakage flow distributed about the drilling tool 3 from the inner of the rock driling machine to prevent drill cuttings and other impuities from entering into the rock drilling machine.

## Claims

1. Rock drilling machine comprising a housing (1), a hammer piston (2) movable to-and-fro in the housing, a drilling tool (3), and a guide (4) for guiding the drilling tool, the hammer piston being intended for exerting the drilling tool to impacts, characterized in that the guide (4), at least at the surface against the drilling tool (3), is made of polyethyleneterephthalate.
#### COM. v. TRIVIGNO, P.

3277 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

Reargument Denied 9/13/2017

CP-51-CR-0100861-1996 (Philadelphia)

Affirmed
EXHIBIT 32.3   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Madison Gas and Electric Company (the "Company"), for the period ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gary J. Wolter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary J. WolterGary J. Wolter
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 6, 2013
#### Jensen v. Johnson County, Kansas

110,752

09/24/2015

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23812-23813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-306]


Northern States Power Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Northern States Power Company (the licensee) to withdraw 
its February 10, 1998, application for proposed amendment to Facility 
Operating License No. DPR-60 for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating 
Plant, Unit 2, located in Goodhue County, Minnesota.
    The proposed amendment requested a limited duration change to the 
Prairie Island Technical Specifications that would allow a reduction in 
the boron concentration required for Mode 6.
    The Commission had previously published notices in the Minneapolis 
Star Tribune on February 16, 1998, and in the Red Wing Republican Eagle 
and Minneapolis Star Tribune on February 17, 1998, requesting comments 
on the NRC staff's proposed determination that the proposed amendment 
involved no significant hazards considerations. However, by letter 
dated March 31, 1998, the licensee withdrew the proposed change.

[[Page 23813]]

    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated February 10, 1998, and the licensee's 
letter dated March 31, 1998, which withdrew the application for license 
amendment. The above documents are available for public inspection at 
the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
located at the Minneapolis Public Library, Technology and Science 
Department, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of April 1998.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Tae Kim,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate III-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-11501 Filed 4-29-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Lee Andrew LEWIS, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1091

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 26, 2017

L.T. NO.: 99-4681

Denied.
# C_2019183EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/1

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/870 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 concerning restrictive measures against Iran

(2019/C 183/01)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that are presently designated in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/870 (2) and in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/855 (4) concerning restrictive measures against Iran.

The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities presently designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/413/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 should continue to apply to those persons and entities.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex X to Regulation (EU) No 267/2012, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 26 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2019, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |
| Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu

---

(1)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 140, 28.5.2019, p. 90.

(3)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 140, 28.5.2019, p. 1.

---
# C_2019239EN.01000401.xml

| 16.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/4

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 239/05)

| Member State | Czech Republic |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Vienna (VIE) Austria
  Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Munich (MUC) Germany |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 1 September 2019 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained | For further information please contact attorney of Moravian-Silesian Region:





  CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář |
| Hvězdova 1716/2b |
| 140 00 Praha 4 |
| CZECH REPUBLIC |
| Tel. +420 224827884 |
| Fax +420 224827879 |
| kucera@akccs.cz |
| www.akccs.cz |

Member State

Czech Republic

Concerned routes

Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Vienna (VIE) Austria

Ostrava (OSR) Czech Republic – Munich (MUC) Germany

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

1 September 2019

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained

For further information please contact attorney of Moravian-Silesian Region:

CÍSAŘ, ČEŠKA, SMUTNÝ s.r.o., advokátní kancelář

Hvězdova 1716/2b

140 00 Praha 4

CZECH REPUBLIC

Tel. +420 224827884

Fax +420 224827879

kucera@akccs.cz

www.akccs.cz

---
397A16

#### State v. Adam Robert Jackson

1. Def’s Motion for Removal of Current Appellate Counsel and Reappointment of the Office of the Appellate Defender

2. Defs Motion for Current Appellate Counsel to Deliver Entíre File to the Office of the Appellate Defender

1. Allowed 11/07/2016

2. Allowed 11/07/2016
#### Horn v. State

105,662

04/08/13

Denied.

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 23271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-11276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
(A-351-817)


Certain Cut-to-length Carbon Steel Plate From Brazil; Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; Extension of Time Limit

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit of the preliminary results of the antidumping duty 
administrative review of Certain Cut-to-length Carbon Steel Plate From 
Brazil. This review covers the period August 1, 1996 through July 31, 
1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 28, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kramer or Linda Ludwig, Office 
of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0405 
or 482-3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to the time required to verify whether 
shipments of merchandise covered by the antidumping order occurred 
during the period of review, it is not practicable to complete this 
review within the original time limit. See Decision Memorandum from 
Joseph A. Spetrini, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III, 
to Robert S. LaRussa, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, 
dated April 21,1998. Therefore, the Department is extending the time 
limit for completion of the preliminary results until August 31, 1998, 
in accordance with Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Trade and Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994. The 
deadline for the final results of this review will continue to be 120 
days after publication of the preliminary results.
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1675 (a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: April 21, 1998.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 98-11276 Filed 4-27-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

May 9, 2006 

Mercury General Corporation 

Los Angeles, California 

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-62228, 333-01583 and 333-125460 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 9, 2006 related to our reviews of interim financial information. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independentregistered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

KPMG LLP 

Los Angeles, California
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0093 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BERT GERARD PLAGGEMEYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 7 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 3 2024

09/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0093
```

                                                                   Exhibit 32(a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of The LGL Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremiah M. Healy, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Steve Pegg, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
   15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
   Company.

August 14, 2007                                 /s/ Jeremiah M. Healy
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Jeremiah M. Healy
                                                PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

August 14, 2007                                 /s/ Steve Pegg
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Steve Pegg
                                                PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
```
|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                             
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                       
|View History:                                                              
|                                                                           
|Minnesota Natural Gas Imports (No intransit Receipts)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           
|                                                                           
|Minnesota Natural Gas Imports (No intransit Receipts)  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         | 243,900 | 144,798 | 190,418 | 206,613 | 157,662 | 134,099 | 233,331 | 262,402
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 308,581 | 378,492 | 369,137 | 383,702 | 387,466 | 406,883 | 401,473 | 402,706 | 475,152 | 512,135
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 476,958 | 454,833 | 408,597 | 364,725 | 404,091 | 472,600 | 422,847 | 504,676 | 481,748 | 482,749
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 451,405 | 548,686 | 406,327 | 243,805 | 328,610 | 233,011 | 312,263 | 487,541 | 316,945 | 319,069
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 267,337 | 378,456 | 455,900 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### State v. Crudo

112,805

04/21/2016

Denied.

Unpubhshed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DEWPOINT, LLC, § § No. 577, 2016 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below – Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § CITY OF WILMINGTON, § C.A. No. N15A-12-008 JAMES “RAY” RHODES, § COMMISSIONER OF THE § DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES § AND INSPECTIONS, BOARD OF § LICENSE AND INSPECTION § REVIEW, GLADYS SPIKES, § MAMIE BAYNARD, JERRY § VELAZQUEZ and DANIEL § BENEDETTO, § § Defendants Below, § Appellees. §

Submitted: May 10, 2017 Decided: May 24, 2017

Before VALIHURA

, VAUGHN , and SEITZ , Justices.

ORDER

This 24 th day of May 2017, after careful cons ideration of the parties’ briefs

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior

Court should be affirmed on the basis of a nd for the reasons stated in its October 17,

2016 and November 9, 2016 orders.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
Justice
MELDON RICH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2170

____________ _________________/

Opinion filed July 2, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman , Judge

.

Meldon Rich , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Brittany Rhodaback, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, RAY

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE Energy, Inc., for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Terry A. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Terry A. HansonTerry A. Hanson
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Date: August 7, 2008
#### Osiris Edward LOPEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0700

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MARCH 31, 2017

L.T. NO.: 16-2334

Denied.
#### CHESTNUT, D. v. GARDNER, D.

262 MDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/31/2017

15-00569

(Lycoming)

Affirmed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RENARD TRUMAN POLK, Appellant, vs. TIMOTHY FILSON; WILLIAM RUEBART; AND TASHEENA SANDOVAL, Respondents. No. 84502 

# FILED APR 1 8 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN BY CLERK OF SU4REME COURT < DEPU CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court minute order denying a postconviction motion in arrest of judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a postconviction motion in arrest ofjudgment, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State,106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J.

Silver
, J.

dd- JP-13

### cc: Hon. Eric Johnson. District Judge

Renard Truman Polk Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NevADA (0) 1947A ogiFP. 

### 2