alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Andrew P. Feig, Petitioner, *v.*Board of Assessors of the Town of Fallsburg, Respondent. In the Matter of Catskill Brokers, Inc., Petitioner, *v.*Board of Assessors of the Town of Fallsburg, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Sullivan County,

March 22, 1972.

*Scheinman & Kalter (Michael R. Gottlieb*of counsel), for petitioners. *Bernard Silverman*for respondent.

Harold J. Hughes, J.

Petitioners instituted separate proceedings to review tax assessments under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law. Respondent has moved to dismiss the petitions on the ground that the proceedings were not commenced within the time required by section 702 of the Real Property Tax Law, which provides in pertinent part: “ 2. Such a proceeding shall be commenced within thirty days after the final completion and filing of the assessment roll containing such assessment. For the purposes of this section an assessment roll shall not be considered finally completed and filed until notice thereof has been given as required by law.”

*323It is not disputed that the assessment roll was completed and filed and that notice thereof was posted and published as required by section *516 of*the Beal Property Tax Law on July 1, 1971. These proceedings were not commenced until November 9, 1971, more than 30 days after the period of limitation began to run.

Petitioners’ argument that respondent’s failure to mail notices of increase in assessment in accordance with section 510 of the Beal Property Tax Law extended the time within which to commence the proceedings is without merit. The provisions of section 510 are directory only, in that 1 ‘ Failure to mail any such notice or failure of the owner to receive the same shall not prevent the levy, collection and enforcement of the payment of the taxes on such real property.” While it is nowhere stated that failure to mail or receive such notice shall not extend the time to complain or contest an assessment, such was clearly intended by the Legislature, since one object of the provisions for posting and publishing notice in section 516 is to set in motion the period of limitation prescribed by section 702 *(People ex rel. American Exch. Nat. Bank*v. *Purdy,*196 N. Y. 270, 276; *Matter of Denio*v. *Commissioner of Assessment & Taxation of City of Albany,*24 Misc 2d 721).

Citing *Schroeder*v. *City of New York*(371 U. S. 208), petitioners urge that notice by posting and publication deprived them of due process by failing to give them adequate notice of their individual assessments. The *Schroeder*case related to the adequacy of notice of condemnation proceedings, and is inapposite here. While every taxpayer must be afforded notice and an opportunity to complain of his assessment, all that is required is adequate notice *(Stuart*v. *Palmer,*74 N. Y. 183), and notice by posting and publication is both reasonable and adequate under the circumstances *(Matter of Long*v. *Jerzewski,*235 App. Div. 441; *People ex rel. City of New York*v. *Hoar,*191 Misc. 292).

Bespondent’s motions to dismiss the petitions are granted, without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 18767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-9940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy, Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory.

DATES: Tuesday, April 22, 1997: 6:30 p.m.--9:30 p.m., 8:00 p.m. to 8:15 
p.m. (public comment session).

ADDRESS: Northern New Mexico Community College, 1002 North Onate 
Street, Espanola, New Mexico 87532.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann DuBois, Los Alamos National 
Laboratory Citizens' Advisory Board Support, Northern New Mexico 
Community College, 1002 Onate Street, Espanola, NM 87352, (800)753-
8970, or (505)753-8970, or (505)262-1800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Advisory Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE and its regulators in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.

Tentative Agenda

Tuesday, April 22, 1997

6:30 p.m.  Call to Order and Welcome
7:00 p.m.  Public Comment
8:00 p.m.  Old Business
8:15 p.m.  New Business
9:30 p.m.  Adjourn

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed 
with the Committee either before or after the meeting. Individuals who 
wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact 
Ms. Ann DuBois at (800) 753-8970. The Designated Federal Official is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. This notice is being published less than 
15 days before the date of the meeting due to programmatic issues that 
needed to be resolved prior to publication.

Minutes

    The minutes of this meeting will be available for public review and 
copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190, 
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585 
between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Herman Le-Doux, 
Department of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los 
Alamos, NM 87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on April 14, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-9940 Filed 4-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lydall, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Form 10-Q solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not being filed as a part of this Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.



|               |  |  |  |                                                      
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|August 4, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Dale G. Barnhart                                 
|               |  |  |  | Dale G. Barnhart                                     
|               |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                
|               |  | 
|August 4, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas P. Smith                                  
|               |  |  |  | Thomas P. Smith                                      
|               |  |  |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
No. 12-5084.

#### Tenerelli *v.*United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 31.2**
I, Scott P. Youngstrom, Chief Financial Officer of Compex Technologies, Inc.,certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CompexTechnologies, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report fairly present, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of Compex Technologies, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating toregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of tan annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
b) all significant deficiencies and material weakness inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theinternal controls of the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 14, 2004     /s/ Scott P. Youngstrom     Signature
#### COM. v. YOUNG, T.

1570 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania,

07/19/2017

CP-02-CR-0000832-2016 (Allegheny)

Affirmed
# C_2019067EN.01000101.xml

| 20.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 67/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 67/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 14 February 2019

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banque centrale du Luxembourg

(ECB/2019/6)

(2019/C 67/01)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States whose currency is the euro are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Banque centrale du Luxembourg’s current external auditors, Deloitte Audit SARL, ended after the audit for the financial year 2018. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Banque centrale du Luxembourg’s current external auditors, Deloitte Audit SARL, ended after the audit for the financial year 2018. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2019.

| (3) | Banque centrale du Luxembourg has selected Ernst & Young SA as its external auditors for the financial years 2019 to 2023, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banque centrale du Luxembourg has selected Ernst & Young SA as its external auditors for the financial years 2019 to 2023,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Ernst & Young SA should be appointed as the external auditors of Banque centrale du Luxembourg for the financial years 2019 to 2023.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 14 February 2019.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38828

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

JOHNATHAN RICHARD COVINGTON
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 374

Filed: February 27, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Franklin County. Hon. Mitchell W. Brown , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of three years , for lewd conduct with a minor child under
sixteen

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Th omas , State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Johnathan Richard Covington pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under

sixteen . Idaho Code § 18

- 1508 . The district court sentenced Covington to a term of ten years,

with three years determinate . Covington appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the rea sonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. To ohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2 the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having revie wed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Covington’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 133 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.133
                                         Agreed to July 26, 2012        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twelve

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL TO PRESENT 
              THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL.

    (a) Authorization.--The rotunda of the United States Capitol is 
authorized to be used on September 12, 2012, for the presentation of 
the Congressional Gold Medal to Arnold Palmer, in recognition of his 
service to the Nation in promoting excellence and good sportsmanship in 
golf.
    (b) Preparations.--Physical preparations for the conduct of the 
event described in subsection (a) shall be carried out in accordance 
with such conditions as may be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### C.G. v. K.N.

215 WDA 2017

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/26/2017

10901-2016 (Erie)

Affirmed
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GC COLUMBIA, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION,

Appellee

______________________ 

2023-1403

______________________ 

Appeal from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals in 

No. 7374, Administrative Judge Harold C. Kullberg, Administrative Judge Jerome M. Drummond, Administrative 

Judge Patricia J. Sheridan.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

WILHELM DINGLER, Bullivant Houser Bailey PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellant. Also represented by 

ANTOINE JULIAN SMITH. 

 LIRIDONA SINANI, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN M.

Case: 23-1403 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 04/03/2024
BOYNTON, WILLIAM JAMES GRIMALDI, IGOR HELMAN,

PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, CLEVENGER, and CUNNINGHAM,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 3, 2024

Date

Case: 23-1403 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 04/03/2024
Successor Rights Agent Letter



 EXHIBIT 4(c) 
  
 AcuityBrands 

	 	  	 Acuity Brands, Inc
 1170 Peachtree Street,
NE
 Suite 2400
 Atlanta, GA 30309
  
 Tel: 404 853 1400
 Fax: 404 853 1440
  
 AcuityBrands.com


  
 June 5, 2003

  
 The Bank of New York 
 101 Barc1ay Street 11E 
 New York, New York 10286 
  
 Re: Shareholder Protection Rights Agreement dated as of November 12, 2001

  
 Dear Sir or Madam: 
  
 Acuity Brands, Inc. hereby appoints The Bank of New York, effective June 9,
2003, as successor Rights Agent under the above-referenced Agreement originally entered into by and between Acuity Brands, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A, 
  

	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Helen D. Haines
	

	 Helen D. Haines
 Vice President and
Secretary



  
 Appointment accepted:

 The Bank of New York 
  
 By: /s/ Eon Canzius 

	 	


  
 Date: June 9, 2003  

	 	


  
  

	 Lighting Group

	 	   Specialty Products


	 Lithonia    Holophane    Peerless    Hydrel
	 	  Zep    Selig    Enforcer    National    Chemical
087A16

#### In re Hughes

Johanna Schoen, Ph.D’s Motion for Leave to File *Amicus*Brief

Denied 08/18/2016
#### Milquiades GOMEZ, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D16-1624

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

APRIL 26, 2017

L.T. NO.: 87-35969

Denied.
|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                            
|View History:                                                             
|                                                                          
|Oregon Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          
|                                                                          
|Oregon Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | 924    | 554    | 265    | 166    | 152    | 214   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 198    | 3      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0     
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0      | 0      | 0      |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 32.2******Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MGE  Energy, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Terry A.  Hanson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.**