alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 83 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.83
                                       Agreed to October 4, 2011        

                      One Hundred Twelfth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
            the fifth day of January, two thousand and eleven

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2608) making continuing 
appropriations for fiscal year 2012, and for other purposes, the Clerk 
of the House of Representatives shall make the following further 
correction:
     Amend section 124 to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 124.  Section 8909a(d)(3)(A)(v) of title 5, United States 
Code, shall be applied by substituting the date specified in section 
106(3) of this Act for the date specified in such section 
8909a(d)(3)(A)(v).''.
Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### ARMSTRONG, R. v. Cullen McClay COOPER

2758 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/06/2017

2014-C-666 (Lehigh)

Affirmed
Exhibit 99.1   Officer's Certificate regarding Annual Statement of
               Compliance of Washington Mutual Bank

                             WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

The  undersigned  officer of  Washington  Mutual  Bank (the  "Servicer")  hereby
certifies  on behalf of the  Servicer  and on his own behalf for purposes of the
WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR19, as follows:

1. I am the duly appointed and qualified Senior Vice President of the Servicer.

2. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement related to the
above-referenced series of Certificates.

3. I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's Certificate on
behalf of the Servicer.

4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been made under my
supervision.

5. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 1, 2006.




                     WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK


                     By: /s/ Henry J. Berens
                         -------------------------------------
                         Henry J. Berens
                         Senior Vice President
#### Lourdes RICE, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. PLANTATION GENERAL HOSPITAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, etc., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0589

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 10, 2017

L.T. NO.: 13-29850

Dismissed.
No. 12-6261.

#### Moss *v.*Tucker, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

p0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142305

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142305 COA: 294591 Eaton CC: 09-020087-FC RASHIDA MORGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 23, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
#### COM. v. CAMERON, P.

1879 WDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

08/01/2017

CP-02-CR-0006725-2016

(Allegheny)

Affirmed
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 653 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 653

  Designating October 30, 2010, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2010

 Mr. Bunning (for himself, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Alexander, Mr. 
 Bingaman, Mrs. Murray, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. 
    Reid, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Corker, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. 
 Schumer) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 30, 2010, as a national day of remembrance for 
                    nuclear weapons program workers.

Whereas, since World War II, hundreds of thousands of men and women, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, have served the United States by 
        building the nuclear defense weapons of the United States;
Whereas these dedicated workers paid a high price for their service to develop a 
        nuclear weapons program for the benefit of the United States, including 
        having developed disabling or fatal illnesses;
Whereas, in 2009, Congress recognized the contribution, service, and sacrifice 
        these patriotic men and women made for the defense of the United States;
Whereas, in the year prior to the approval of this resolution, a national day of 
        remembrance time capsule has been crossing the United States, collecting 
        artifacts and the stories of the nuclear workers relating to the nuclear 
        defense era of the United States;
Whereas these stories and artifacts reinforce the importance of recognizing 
        these nuclear workers; and
Whereas these patriotic men and women deserve to be recognized for the 
        contribution, service, and sacrifice they have made for the defense of 
        the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 30, 2010, as a national day of 
        remembrance for nuclear weapons program workers, including 
        uranium miners, millers, and haulers, of the United States; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to support 
        and participate in appropriate ceremonies, programs, and other 
        activities to commemorate October 30, 2010, as a national day 
        of remembrance for past and present workers in the nuclear 
        weapons program of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### Darren R. GENTILQUORE, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee

No. 64 MAP 2017

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 27, 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2017, the Notice of Appeal is quashed.
|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                            
|View History:                                                                             
|                                                                                          
|Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          
|                                                                                          
|Waddington, NY Natural Gas Pipeline Imports From Canada  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                          

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        | 2.92   | 2.82   | 2.38   | 2.54  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 4.24   | 4.81   | 3.60   | 5.81   | 6.51   | 9.38   | 7.62   | 7.57   | 9.42   | 4.60  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 5.44   | 4.99   | 3.87   | 5.58   | 8.54   | 5.00   | 3.10   | 4.13   | 4.47   | 3.43  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 2.38   | 4.25   | 8.00   | 3.77   |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
EXHIBIT 31.1


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                  UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:
1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RASC Series 2006-EMX1 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");
2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and
5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.
   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
   information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
   Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association.

Date:  March 26, 2007

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      --------------------
      Name: Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
**Exhibit 23.3
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142671 and333-145445) of our report dated November 17, 2005 on our audit of the financial statements of Instantel Inc. as of June9, 2005 and for the period from January 1, 2005 to June 9, 2005 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007 of VeriChip Corporation.
**MEYERS NORRIS PENNY LLP**
/s/ Meyers Norris Penny LLP
March 26, 2008
 **
|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                    
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History: Annual                                                              
|View History:                                                                     
|                                                                                  
|Georgia Natural Gas Imports Price All Countries  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|Georgia Natural Gas Imports Price All Countries  (Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        |        | --    
|2000's                                                                                                                            | --     | 1.92   | 3.51   | 5.12   | 6.47   | 9.18   | 7.03   | 6.79   | 9.71   | 3.73  
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 4.39   | 4.20   | 2.78   | 3.36   | 4.33   | 2.83   | 2.49   | 3.28   | 4.41   | 4.78  
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 1.84   | --     | --     |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
268P16-2

#### Owen D. Leavitt v. Willie Hargrove

Pit’s *Pro Se*Motion for Notice of Appeal

Dismissed *ex mero motu*
No. 12-5848.

#### Williams *v.*Humphrey, Warden.

Super. Ct. Butts County, Ga. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10d


 


STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
ARCADIS NV


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 


In connection
with the Annual Report of Arcadis NV (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period
ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), I, Henk W.M.W. ten Cate, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:


 


1)              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


 


2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 


 


	
  /s/ Henk
  W.M.W. ten Cate

  	
   

  
	
  Name: Henk
  W.M.W. ten Cate

  
	
  Title: Chief
  Financial Officer ARCADIS NV

  
	
  June 12,
  2003

  



 


1
425P16

#### State v. Ronald Michael Thomas

Defs *Pro Se*Petition for *Writ of Certiorari*to Review Order of COA (COAP16-326)

Dismissed
Exhibit 10.2 Board of Directors Resolutions


Exhibit 10.2




HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP.

6409 Lake Meadow Drive

Burke, VA 22015




UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF DIRECTORS OF HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. IN LIEU OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. (A NEVADA CORPORATION)




Pursuant to the Authority granted to directors to take action by unanimous consent without a meeting pursuant to Nevada General Corporation Law 78.315 (pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation) of HPC POS System, Corp. (“HPC”) the Board of Directors (“Directors”) of HPC, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), do hereby consent to adopt, ratify, confirm and approve, as of the date indicated below, the following recitals and resolutions, as evidenced by their signature hereunder:




WHEREAS, the Directors have been presented with the proposal to authorize the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for relief of debt owed by the Company in the amount of five thousand ($5,000) Dollars represented by a Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollar Promissory Note (the “Promissory Note”) dated May 1, 2009;




WHEREAS, the Directors shall specifically authorize the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Dale S. Pearlman;




WHEREAS, the Directors believe it is in the best interest of the Company to authorize the issuance of the common stock to Dale S. Pearlman  in exchange for relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note as set forth herein;




NOW, BE IT RESOLVED, that it is hereby authorized and approved to issue 5,000,000 shares of common stock of the Dale S. Perlman. in exchange for partial relief of the debt represented by the Promissory Note.




GENERAL RESOLUTIONS




RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are hereby authorized and instructed to take whatever steps necessary to effectuate the above described resolutions.




FURTHER RESOLVED,  that the Promissory Note shall be restated and amended to show that a payment in the amount of $5,000 on the Promissory Note has been satisfied by the Company.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set forth their hands in their capacity as of this 13th day of March, 2012.







	
	 

	 


	/s/ Melvin W. Coles


	MELVIN W. COLES, DIRECTOR


	 


	 


	/s/ Bonnie Coles


	BONNIE COLES, DIRECTOR


	 


	 


	/s/ Deborah Colley


	DEBORAH COLLEY, DIRECTOR
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------




                                 CERTIFICATION


      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
      Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect
      of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWHEQ
      Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2005-I;

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
      whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
      to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
      misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
      report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
      required to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the
      pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
      reports is included in these reports;

      4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
      servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
      based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under
      that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master
      servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
      master servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
      upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
      conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
      Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
      pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
      reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as indenture trustee.


      Date: March 24, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1059 

To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority of the Judicial 

Conference to redact sensitive information contained in their financial 

disclosure reports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2011 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. COHEN, and Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect the safety of judges by extending the authority 

of the Judicial Conference to redact sensitive information 

contained in their financial disclosure reports, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF REDACTION AUTHORITY CON4 CERNING SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMA5 TION. 

6 Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act 

7 of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1059 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Mar2 shall’’ and inserting ‘‘Marshals’’; and 

3 (2) by striking subparagraph (E). 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS