This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains notices to the public of the proposed

issuance of rules and regulations. The

purpose of these notices is to give interested

persons an opportunity to participate in the

rule making prior to the adoption of the final

rules.

Proposed Rules Federal Register

30485 

Vol. 79, No. 102 

Wednesday, May 28, 2014 

1 76 FR 75825 (Dec. 5, 2011). The Streamlining 

Inherited Regulations project provided for an initial 

comment period and another period for replies to 

those comments. Although the request for an 

extension of the present comment period points out 

that the annual privacy notice amendment proposal 

has several specifics that were not included in the 

earlier streamlining project request for comments, 

the Bureau believes that those two rounds of 

comments provided robust and helpful input and 

afforded interested parties a meaningful chance to 

participate regarding the topic of the proposed rule. 

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION 

12 CFR Part 1016 

[Docket No. CFPB–2014–0010] 

RIN 3170–AA39 

Amendment to the Annual Privacy 

Notice Requirement Under the GrammLeach-Bliley Act (Regulation P) 

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: On May 13, 2014, the Bureau 

of Consumer Financial Protection 

(Bureau) published in the Federal 

Register a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking proposing an amendment to 

the annual privacy notice requirement 

set forth in subpart A of Regulation P 

(Annual Privacy Notice Proposal). The 

Annual Privacy Notice Proposal allowed 

a 30-day comment period that will end 

on June 12, 2014. To allow interested 

persons additional time to consider and 

submit their responses, the Bureau has 

determined that an extension of the 

comment period until July 14, 2014, is 

appropriate. 

DATES: The comment period for the 

Annual Privacy Notice Proposal 

published May 13, 2014, at 79 FR 

27214, is extended. Responses must 

now be received on or before July 14, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Docket No. CFPB–2014– 

0010 or RIN 3170–AA39, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Electronic: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Monica Jackson, Office of the 

Executive Secretary, Consumer 

Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G 

Street NW., Washington, DC 20552. 

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Monica 

Jackson, Office of the Executive 

Secretary, Consumer Financial 

Protection Bureau, 1275 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20002. 

Instructions: All submissions should 

include the agency name and docket 

number or Regulatory Information 

Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. 

Because paper mail in the Washington, 

DC area and at the Bureau is subject to 

delay, commenters are encouraged to 

submit comments electronically. In 

general, all comments received will be 

posted without change to http://

www.regulations.gov. In addition, 

comments will be available for public 

inspection and copying at 1275 First 

Street NE., Washington, DC 20002, on 

official business days between the hours 

of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time. You 

can make an appointment to inspect the 

documents by telephoning (202) 435– 

7275. 

All comments, including attachments 

and other supporting materials, will 

become part of the public record and 

subject to public disclosure. Sensitive 

personal information, such as account 

numbers or social security numbers, 

should not be included. Comments 

generally will not be edited to remove 

any identifying or contact information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

general inquiries, submission process 

questions, or any additional 

information, please contact Monica 

Jackson, Office of the Executive 

Secretary, 202–435–7275. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 6, 

2014, the Bureau issued the Annual 

Privacy Notice Proposal. The Annual 

Privacy Notice Proposal was then 

published in the Federal Register on 

May 13, 2014. The Annual Privacy 

Notice Proposal seeks comment, data 

and information from the public about 

a proposed amendment to the annual 

privacy notice requirement set forth in 

subpart A of Regulation P, 12 CFR Part 

1016. The amendment would create an 

alternative delivery method for this 

annual privacy disclosure, which 

financial institutions would be able to 

use under certain conditions. 

The comment period on the Annual 

Privacy Notice Proposal was to close on 

June 12, 2014. 

The Bureau has received a 

coordinated request from banking and 

financial service provider trade 

associations asking that the Bureau 

extend the Annual Privacy Notice 

Proposal comment period from 30 to 90 

days. The request indicated that 

additional time would enable interested 

parties to more thoroughly evaluate and 

respond to the specific issues raised in 

the proposal. 

The Bureau balances interested 

parties’ desire to have additional time to 

consider the issues raised in the Annual 

Privacy Notice Proposal, gather data, 

and prepare their responses, with the 

need to proceed expeditiously to 

consider comments and determine 

whether to issue a final rule. As noted 

in the proposal, the Bureau anticipates 

that making the proposed alternative 

delivery mechanism available could 

benefit both industry and consumers. 

Moreover, the proposed rule is 

relatively brief and concerns a single 

alternative delivery method for a single 

notice. It also concerns a topic on which 

the Bureau has previously sought and 

received two rounds of public 

comment.1 The Bureau believes in light 

of these factors that a 60-day extension 

of the comment period, resulting in a 

90-day comment period, is not 

necessary or appropriate. However, the 

Bureau believes that a 30-day extension 

is appropriate. The comment period will 

therefore close on July 14, 2014. 

Dated: May 20, 2014. 

Richard Cordray, 

Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection. 

[FR Doc. 2014–12148 Filed 5–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0541; Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–097–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

30486 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: The FAA withdraws a notice 

of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that 

would supersede certain existing 

airworthiness directives (ADs) for The 

Boeing Company Model 757–200, 

–200PF, and –200CB series airplanes. 

The NPRM proposed to require a 

determination of the type of trailing 

edge wedges of the leading edge slats, 

repetitive inspections on certain trailing 

edge wedges for areas of skin-to-core 

disbonding, and corrective actions if 

necessary; and proposed to revise the 

applicability of the existing ADs to 

include additional airplanes. The NPRM 

also provided an optional terminating 

action for the repetitive inspections. 

Since we issued the NPRM, we have 

determined that the manufacturer’s 

service information is inadequate to 

accomplish the actions necessary to 

address the unsafe condition. Once the 

manufacturer has issued new service 

information to address the unsafe 

condition, we may issue new 

rulemaking action that positively 

addresses the unsafe condition 

identified in the NPRM. Accordingly, 

the NPRM is withdrawn. 

DATES: As of May 28, 2014, the 

proposed rule, which was published in 

the Federal Register on July 2, 2013 (78 

FR 39633), is withdrawn. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0541; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD action, the NPRM (78 

FR 39633, July 2, 2013), the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) 

is the Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6440; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: Nancy.Marsh@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We proposed to amend part 39 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

part 39) with a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) for a new AD to 

supersede AD 90–23–06, Amendment 

39–6794 (55 FR 46499, November 5, 

1990; AD 91–22–51, Amendment 39– 

8129 (57 FR 781, January 9, 1992; and 

AD 2005–07–08, Amendment 39–14032 

(70 FR 16403, March 31, 2005), for 

certain Model 757–200, –200PF, and 

–200CB series airplanes. The NPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 2, 2013 (78 FR 39633). The NPRM 

proposed to require a determination of 

the type of trailing edge wedges of the 

leading edge slats, repetitive inspections 

on certain trailing edge wedges for areas 

of skin-to-core disbonding, and 

corrective actions if necessary; and 

proposed to revise the applicability of 

ADs 90–23–06, 91–22–51, and 2005–07– 

08 to include additional airplanes. The 

NPRM also provided an optional 

terminating action for the repetitive 

inspections. The NPRM was prompted 

by reports of slat disbonding on 

airplanes on which the terminating 

actions of ADs 90–23–06, 91–22–51, and 

2005–07–08 were completed; and we 

have received reports of slats 

disbonding on airplanes outside of the 

applicability of ADs 90–23–06, 91–22– 

51, and 2005–07–08. 

Actions Since the NPRM (78 FR 39633, 

July 2, 2013) Was Issued 

Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 

39633, July 2, 2013), we have 

determined that the manufacturer’s 

service information is inadequate to 

accomplish the actions necessary to 

address the unsafe condition. 

FAA’s Conclusions 

We have determined that the unsafe 

condition identified in the NPRM (78 

FR 39633, July 2, 2013) still exists. Once 

the manufacturer has issued new service 

information to address the unsafe 

condition, we may issue new 

rulemaking action that positively 

addresses the unsafe condition 

identified in the NPRM. Accordingly, 

the NPRM is withdrawn. 

Withdrawal of the NPRM (78 FR 

39633, July 2, 2013) does not preclude 

the FAA from issuing the related actions 

or commit the FAA to any course of 

action in the future. 

Regulatory Impact 

Since this action only withdraws the 

NPRM (78 FR 39633, July 2, 2013), it is 

neither a proposed nor a final rule and 

therefore is not covered under Executive 

Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, or DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979). 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Withdrawal 

Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM, 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0541, Directorate 

Identifier 2011–NM–097–AD, which 

published in the Federal Register on 

July 2, 2013 (78 FR 39633). 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 16, 

2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–12258 Filed 5–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0283; Directorate 

Identifier 2012–NM–183–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–03– 

05, which applies to all The Boeing 

Company Model 747–200C and –200F 

series airplanes. AD 2010–03–05 

currently requires, for section 41 upper 

deck floor beam upper chords, an 

inspection for cracks of certain fastener 

holes, and corrective action if necessary; 

and repetitive replacements of the upper 

chords, straps (or angles), and radius 

fillers of certain upper deck floor beams 

and, for any replacement that is done, 

inspections for cracks, and corrective 

actions if necessary. Since we issued AD 

2010–03–05, we have determined that 

the upper deck floor beams are subject 

to widespread fatigue damage (WFD), 

the existing inspection program is not 

sufficient to maintain an acceptable 

level of safety, and section 42 upper 

deck floor beam upper chords are 

subject to the unsafe condition. This 

proposed AD would add postreplacement inspections for section 41 

and reduce certain compliance times. 

This proposed AD would also require 

repetitive inspections of section 42 

upper deck floor beam upper chords, 

repetitive replacements of the upper 

chords, post-replacement inspections, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS