alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.7

                            APRIL 1, 2003 ADDENDUM TO
                   WAREHOUSING LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE
              Dated February 20, 2002 as amended February 15, 2003


         On February 20, 2002, Temporary Financial Services, Inc. ("TFS") and
Genesis Financial, Inc. ("GENESIS") entered into a Warehousing Line of Credit
Promissory Note and related loan documents (collectively the "Line of Credit")
for a $2,000,000 secured line of credit. TFS was the lender and GENESIS was the
borrower under these documents. The Line was intended to provide GENESIS with
funds for the purchase of seller financed real estate contracts. The Warehousing
Line of Credit Promissory Note was due by its terms on February 15, 2003. On
February 15, 2003, TFS and GENESIS entered into an agreement to extend the line
of credit through August 15, 2003 in order to allow TFS and GENESIS to negotiate
new terms for the Line of Credit.

         After further discussions and negotiations, TFS and Genesis have agreed
to new terms on the Line of Credit, as follows:

         1.       The due date of the Warehousing Line of Credit Promissory Note
                  is extended to March 31, 2004.

         2.       The interest rate set forth in the Warehousing Line of Credit
                  Promissory Note is changed to 8% per annum.

         3.       In addition to the interest rate charged for the extension
                  period, GENESIS will also pay a Commitment Fee for the
                  Warehousing Line of Credit Promissory Note extension in the
                  amount of $20,000 payable $5,000 in cash and $15,000 in
                  Genesis Common Stock at the rate of $1.00 per share or 15,000
                  shares in the aggregate. This additional Commitment Fee
                  relates to the extension period.

         This April 1, 2003 Addendum supercedes and replaces the Addendum dated
February 15, 2003. Except as noted in Paragraphs 1 through 3, above, all other
terms of the Line of Credit remain in full force and effect, including the terms
and conditions described in "Advance and Repayment Procedures," the "Financial
Covenants and Reporting Obligations," the "Security Agreement," and the
"Guaranty."

Dated this 1st day of April, 2003.

GENESIS FINANCIAL, INC.                            ATTEST:

/s/ Michael A. Kirk                                /s/ Douglas B. Durham
Michael A. Kirk, President                         Douglas B. Durham, Chairman

Accepted this 1st day of April, 2003 in
 Spokane, Washington.

Temporary Financial Services, Inc.                 Attest:

/s/ John R. Coghlan                                /s/ Brad E. Herr
John R. Coghlan, President                         Brad E. Herr, Secretary
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 39 

Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson as a citizen regent 

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2011 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BECERRA, Ms. MATSUI, and 

Mr. LATOURETTE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Providing for the reappointment of Shirley Ann Jackson 

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on 

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in 

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Shirley Ann Jack8 son of New York, on May 5, 2011, is filled by the re9 appointment of the incumbent. The appointment is for a 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HJ 39 IH 

1 term of 6 years, beginning on the later of May 6, 2011, 

2 or the date of the enactment of this joint resolution. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Obregon

106,123

05/12/2016

Denied.

Unpublished
|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                  
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                    
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History: Annual                                              
|View History:                                                     
|                                                                  
|North Dakota Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  
|                                                                  
|North Dakota Natural Gas Interstate Receipts  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                  

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3  | Year-4  | Year-5  | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1980's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         |         | 338,072
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 351,741 | 394,319 | 465,592 | 517,897 | 543,543 | 574,766 | 598,044 | 596,337 | 578,285 | 808,102
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 831,330 | 797,744 | 826,133 | 829,785 | 829,444 | 794,602 | 765,054 | 797,404 | 719,096 | 573,000
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 776,202 | 836,026 | 775,650 | 744,335 | 625,069 | 580,676 | 584,729 | 537,994 | 450,021 | 367,815
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 246,770 | 249,917 | 272,945 |         |         |         |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Edward A. Johnson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OptimumCareCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) [Not required]
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     /s/ Edward A. Johnson  Date: November 10, 2003 EDWARD A. JOHNSON,  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### State v. Larsson

111,233

10/09/2015

Denied

Unpublished
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 20612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of California, San Diego; Notice of Decision on 
Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 98-008. Applicant: University of California, San 
Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0359. Instrument: Imaging Plate X-ray 
Detector for Protein Crystallography. Manufacturer: MAR Research, 
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 63 FR 11870, March 11, 1998.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides:
    (1) High efficiency detection of molybdenum K<greek-a> x-rays at 
resolution to 0.12nm and (2) exposure time of just 90s allowing use of 
a single imaging plate under computer control and data readout. The 
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory advised April 15, 1998 (1) 
these capabilities are pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose 
and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument for the applicant's intended 
use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 98-10996 Filed 4-24-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 12-6509.

#### Solis, aka Medel *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|  |   | U.S.      BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION |
|--|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   |                      Title:    VicePresident |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Name      of Lender                      | Applicable      Percentage | Maximum      Credit Amount |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|
| JPMorgan      Chase Bank, N.A.           | 24.50%                     | $      122,500,000.00      |
| GE      Business Financial Services Inc. | 24.50%                     | $      122,500,000.00      |
| BNP      Paribas                         | 15.00%                     | $  75,000,000.00 |
| Toronto      Dominion (Texas) LLC        | 15.00%                     | $  75,000,000.00 |
| ING      Capital LLC                     | 10.00%                     | $  50,000,000.00 |
| US      Bank, N.A.                       | 6.00%                      | $  30,000,000.00 |
| Capital      One, N.A.                   | 5.00%                      | $  25,000,000.00 |
| TOTAL                                    | 100.00%                    | $      500,000,000.00      |

----
IA 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 104 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to Temporary Non-agricultural Employment of H–2B Aliens in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2012 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. BASS of New Hampshire, Mr. 

CASSIDY, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. CARTER, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. 

HARPER, Ms. FOXX, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. 

SCALISE, Mr. BENISHEK, and Mr. LANDRY) introduced the following 

joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Disapproving a rule submitted by the Department of Labor 

relating to Temporary Non-agricultural Employment of 

H–2B Aliens in the United States. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the De4 partment of Labor relating to Temporary Non-agricul5 tural Employment of H–2B Aliens in the United States 

6 (published in the Federal Register on February 21, 2012), 

7 and such rule shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2019347EN.01000401.xml

| 14.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9239 — Evonik/PeroxyChem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 347/04)

On 4 June 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9239. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9239. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 10.40

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

	
Effective   Date: February 27, 2012
    	
 
    	
Amount RMB11,900,000
    


 

PROMISE TO PAY.  Lianhui Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (the “Company”) promises to pay to the order of Beijing Huaxia United Science & Technology Co., Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China (“Lender”) RMB11,900,000 (the “Indebtedness”).

 

MATURITY AND PAYMENT. This Note shall mature within fifteen (15) Business Days after receipt of written notice to the Company by Lender of its demand of repayment of the Indebtedness (the “Due Date”), and the entire balance of the Indebtedness shall be due and payable in full on the Due Date. All payments hereunder shall be in immediately available RMB funds. For the purposes of this Note, “Business Day” shall mean any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday under the laws of the People’s Republic of China.

 

MISCELLANEOUS. Nothing in this Note shall waive or restrict any right of Lender granted in any other document or by law.  No delay on the part of Lender in the exercise of any right or remedy shall operate as a waiver. The terms and conditions of this Note may not be amended, waived or modified except in a writing signed by Lender expressly stating that the writing constitutes an amendment, waiver, or modification of the terms of this Note. This Note shall bind the respective successors and assigns of the Company. This Note is governed by the laws of the People’s Republic of China and is made effective as of the Effective Date.

 

SIGNATURES ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE

 











 

The Company has duly executed this Note as of February 27, 2012.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Lianhui   Auto (Langfang) Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
a   company incorporated in the People’s Republic of China
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
[Company   seal affixed]
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Charles Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Name: Charles Zhengyao Lu
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title: Legal Representative
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.    RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made as of this 22nd day of May, 2001 by and between ADC Telecommunications, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), and
Barclay W. Fitzpatrick ("Participant").

WHEREAS,
pursuant to a letter dated April 12, 2001 (the "Offer Letter"), Participant has been offered employment with the Company and in connection with such offer, the Company
has agreed to grant to Participant a number of shares of its common stock having a face value of $150,000, such grant to be made as of the end of the month during which Participant commences
employment; and

WHEREAS,
Participant commenced his employment with the Company on April 23, 2001; and

WHEREAS,
notwithstanding the terms of the Offer Letter, the Company is not able to make an award of restricted stock without the approval of the Compensation Committee of the
Company's Board of Directors, which approval was received on May 22, 2001.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Company, pursuant to its Global Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), hereby grants the following stock award to Participant, which award shall have the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement:









1

---





2

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written.

| |  | ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.                    
| |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                             
| |  | Its:                                            
| |  | PARTICIPANT                                     
| |  | /s/ Barclay W. FitzpatrickBarclay W. Fitzpatrick

3

---

QuickLinks
# C_2019356EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9453 — Phillips 66/Fortress Investment Group/United Pacific)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2019/C 356/01)

On 11 October 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9453. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9453. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
#### *In re*Rogelio Canales Pacheco.

*Número:*AB-2014-0407

*Resuelto:*27 de enero de 2017

*Margarita Mercado Echegaray,*procuradora general, y *Yaiza-marie Lugo Fontánez,*procuradora general auxiliar; *Manuel E. Ávila de Jesús,*director de la Oficina de Inspección de Notarías, en informe; *Rogelio Canales Pacheco, pro se.*

*275RESOLUCIÓN

Examinados el Informe presentado por el Ledo. Manuel E. Ávila de Jesús, director de la Oficina de Inspección de Notarías, el Escrito de Reacción a Informe de ODIN pre-sentado por el Ledo. Rogelio Canales Pacheco y el Informe de la Procuradora General, y al no haber cumplido el licen-ciado Canales Pacheco con nuestra Resolución de 5 de fe-brero de 2016, *se ordena a la Procuradora General que pre-sente la correspondiente querella.*

*Se suspende preventivamente al licenciado Canales Pacheco del ejercicio de la notaría hasta que este Tribunal tome una determinación final sobre este asunto. Publíquese.*

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario del Tribunal Supremo.

(Fdo.) Juan Ernesto Dávila Rivera *Secretario del Tribunal Supremo*