alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)                        
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                                                  
|View History:                                                                   
|                                                                                
|Other States Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                
|                                                                                
|Other States Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed from Natural Gas  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0  | Year-1  | Year-2  | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6  | Year-7  | Year-8  | Year-9 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------- | ------- | ------- | -------
|1990's                                                                                                                            |         |         |         |        | 924    |        | -       | 6,557   | 6,106   | 6,219  
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 7,223   | 8,170   | 7,519   | 8,401  | 8,541  | 8,286  | 162,575 | 214,286 | 265,311 | 279,146
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 340,264 | 377,939 | 389,072 | 0      | 0      | 0      | 0       | 0       | 0       | 0      
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 0       | 0       | 0       |        |        |        |         |         |         |        
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 7/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 8/30/2024
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 19254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-10226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5999-1]


Public Meetings of the Urban Wet Weather Flows Advisory 
Committee, the Storm Water Phase II Advisory Subcommittee, and the 
Sanitary Sewer Overflow Advisory Subcommittee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
is CANCELLING the May 7-8 public meeting of the Storm Water Phase II 
Advisory Subcommittee. The June 25-26 meeting is still being held. The 
June 25-26 meeting is open to the public without need for advance 
registration. During the June 25-26 meeting, the Storm Water Phase II 
Advisory Committee will discuss the proposed rule and other related 
topics for program implementation.

DATES: May 7-8, 1998 (CANCELLED) and June 25-26, 1998.
    On the first day, the meeting will start at 10:00 a.m. EST and end 
at 5:00 p.m. On the second day, the meeting will begin at 8:00 a.m. and 
end at approximately 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The June 25-26 meeting will be held at The Arlington Hilton 
& Towers, 950 N. Stafford Street, Arlington, VA. The telephone number 
is (703) 812-5109.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharie Centilla, Office of Wastewater 
Management, at (202) 260-6052, or Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#680b0d061c01040409461b00091a010d280d1809460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2340464d574a4f4f420d504b42514a46634653420d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 8, 1998.
Michael B. Cook,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 98-10226 Filed 4-16-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PR97-3-000]


Olympic Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

January 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 12, 1996, Olympic Pipeline Company 
(Olympic), filed pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's 
Regulations, a petition for rate approval requesting that the 
Commission approve as fair and equitable a firm transportation 
reservation charge of $3.22 per MMBtu and a 100 percent load factor 
interruptible transportation charge of $0.1060 per MMBtu for 
transportation services performed by Olympic through its West Chalkley 
System under Section 311(a)(2) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 
(NGPA).
    Olympic states that it is an intrastate pipeline within the meaning 
of Section 2(16) of the NGPA and it owns and operates an intrastate 
pipeline system in the State of Louisiana. Olympic proposes an 
effective date of December 12, 1996.
    Pursuant to Section 284.123(b)(2)(ii), if the Commission does not 
act within 150 days of the filing date, the rate will be deemed to be 
fair and equitable and not in excess of an amount which interstate 
pipelines would be permitted to charge for similar transportation 
service. The Commission may, prior to the expiration of the 150-day 
period, extend the time for action or institute a proceeding to afford 
parties an opportunity for written comments and for the oral 
presentation of views, data, and arguments.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 
385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures. All 
motions must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission on or before 
January 31, 1997. The petition for rate approval is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-934 Filed 1-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
|                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                           
|View History: Annual Download Data (XLS File)                                             
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History: Annual                                                                       
|View History:                                                                              
|                                                                                           
|Georgia Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals All Operators  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           
|                                                                                           
|Georgia Natural Gas Underground Storage Net Withdrawals All Operators  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        |        |        |        | -90    | -339   |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 5/31/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 6/28/2024
#### Hinkle v. State

107,267

08/19/13

Denied.

Unpublished
#### COM. v. BROOMALL, R.

2362 EDA 2016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

07/18/2017

CP-23-CR-0006895-2015, (Delaware)

Affirmed
No. 12-6178.

#### Lester *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|View History:  Monthly  Annual Download Data (XLS File)   
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:  Monthly  Annual                             
|View History:                                              
|                                                           
|Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           
|                                                           
|Arizona Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals  (Million Cubic Feet)
|                                                           

|Decade                                                                                                                            | Year-0 | Year-1 | Year-2 | Year-3 | Year-4 | Year-5 | Year-6 | Year-7 | Year-8 | Year-9
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------ | ------
|1970's                                                                                                                            |        | 1,215  | 809    | 402    | 250    | 255    | 294    | 343    | 286    | 348   
|1980's                                                                                                                            | 357    | 293    | 261    | 240    | 227    | 209    | 185    | 185    | 179    | 1,455 
|1990's                                                                                                                            | 2,147  | 1,280  | 794    | 618    | 759    | 558    | 464    | 453    | 457    | 474   
|2000's                                                                                                                            | 368    | 307    | 301    | 443    | 331    | 233    | 611    | 655    | 523    | 712   
|2010's                                                                                                                            | 183    | 168    | 117    | 72     | 106    | 95     | 47     | 56     | 42     | 66    
|2020's                                                                                                                            | 87     | 229    | 198    |        |        |        |        |        |        |       
|- = No Data Reported;  -- = Not Applicable;  NA = Not Available;  W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.
|                                                                                                                                 
|Release Date: 3/29/2024                                                                                                          
|Next Release Date: 4/30/2024
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(Adopted
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of McMoRan Exploration Co.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Glenn A.
      Kleinert, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 3, 2006





/s/
      Glenn
      A. Kleinert Glenn A. Kleinert


President
      and Chief Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 05/27/99 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

* 

### This decision is rendered by a quorum, due to the retirement of then-Chief Judge Hatchett on May 14, 1999. U.S.C. § 46(d). [PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 97-8592

________________________ D. C. Docket No. 1:95-CV-3147-CAM FORREST KELLY CLAY, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus RIVERWOOD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, THOMAS H. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________ (May 27, 1999) ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before DUBINA and CARNES, Circuit 

### Judges *

.2 

### Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, the prior opinion issued on October 14, 1998, and published at 157 F.3d 1259, is modified, as follows: We vacate the introductory paragraph a nd also Part III A. of our prior opinion in this case, found at 157 F.3d at 1259, 1261, 1263- 68, and adopt in their place the concurring opinion of Judge Carnes, which is found in 157 F.3d at 1269-71. We also vacate Part IV of our prio r opinion and substitute in its place this paragraph: As to the insider trading issu e involving Clay’s stock appreciation rights, we do not decide whether those rights are s ecurities or otherwise trigger the “disclose or abstain” rule of insider trading, but instead affirm the district court’s judgment on the ground that Clay lacks standing to br ing a claim under § 20A of the Securities and Exchange Act. As to the secur ities fraud issue involving Riverwood’s July 1995 press release, we affirm the judgment of th e district court because that release did not require any subsequent disclosure under § 10(b) or Rule 10b-5. AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                               CAMBREX CORPORATION
     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Sections 1350 (a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certify as
follows:

      1.    John R. Leone is the President, Chairman of the Board and Chief
            Executive Officer of Cambrex Corporation.

      2.    The Company's Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31,
            2004, accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the
            Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies
            with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
            Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and

      3.    The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
            Company.

Dated:  April 29, 2005

                                          /s/ John R. Leone
                                          -----------------------------
                                          John R. Leone, President
                                          Chairman of the Board and
                                          Chief Executive Officer

                                       36
#### Francis P. MANLEY, Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s), v. EAST ATLANTIC GARDENS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellee(s)/Respondent(s),

CASE NO.: 3D17-0417

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

MAY 11, 2017

L.T. NO.: 15-17532

Dismissed,
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41629 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JORGE LOPEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-497-1
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jorge Lopez appeals the sentence imposed after the district court revoked the term of supervised release he was serving in connection with his 2001 conviction for conspiracy topossesswith the intent todistributeand distribution of marijuana. Lopez argues that the district court’s written judgment of revocation conflicts with its oral pronouncement ofsentence. The Government agrees. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-41629

2 Lopez pleaded true to violating the terms of his supervised release by leaving the judicial district without permission, and at both the revocation hearing and at sentencing, the district court revoked his release based solely on that violation, not the two other charges alleged in the revocation petition that Lopez committed new state and federal drug offenses. However, the written judgment erroneously reflects that Lopez was adjudicated guilty on all of the allegations in the petition. Additionally, in its oral pronouncement of sentence, the district court ordered that the 18-month sentence imposed be served concurrently to any future sentence on the pending drug charges. The written judgment does not reflect that the 18-month sentence is to be served concurrently with any futuresentence in Lopez’s pending Mississippi drug case. Theref o re, becausethe languageofthedistrictcourt’soral pronouncement of sentence conflicts with its written judgment, the case is remanded for the district court to amend the written judgment to conform to the district court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. See United States v. Martinez, 250 F.3d 941, 942 (5th Cir. 2001). REMANDED.
514P13-5

#### State v. Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner

Def’s *Pro Se*Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction

Dismissed
IV 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 138 

Recognizing Birmingham, Alabama, as the home to the first and longest 

running celebration of Veterans Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 

Mr. BACHUS (for himself and Ms. SEWELL) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Birmingham, Alabama, as the home to the first 

and longest running celebration of Veterans Day. 

Whereas November 11, 2012, is the 65th anniversary of National Veterans Day in Birmingham, Alabama; 

Whereas the National Veterans Day in Birmingham is the 

longest running celebration of Veterans Day in the 

United States; 

Whereas, on November 11, 1946, World War II veteran Raymond Weeks presented General Eisenhower a program 

design proposing replacing Armistice Day with a National Veterans Day 1947; 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HCON 138 IH 

Whereas the very first Veterans Day celebration was held in 

Birmingham by the National Veterans Day organization 

in 1947; 

Whereas President Eisenhower signed into law on June 1, 

1954 the Act proclaiming November 11 as Veterans Day 

(Public Law 83–380); 

Whereas, in 1954, the National Veterans Day volunteer organization, started by Raymond Weeks, expanded to organize a multiday celebration including, a Veterans Day 

Parade, a World Peace Luncheon, and presentation during the National Veterans Award Dinner of the National 

Veterans Award; 

Whereas these three events have been held every year since 

1954; 

Whereas the briefing for President Reagan by Elizabeth Dole 

for the Presidential Citizens Medals cited Raymond 

Weeks as the ‘‘Father of Veterans Day’’; 

Whereas President Reagan recognized Raymond Weeks as 

the driving force behind Veterans Day while presenting 

Mr. Weeks with the Presidential Citizens Medal on November 11, 1982; 

Whereas Raymond Weeks should be recognized for his push 

to honor the great men and women who have served their 

country with a special day of recognition; and 

Whereas Birmingham, Alabama, should be recognized for its 

contributions to the institution of Veterans Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate 

2 concurring), That Congress hereby— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HCON 138 IH 

1 (1) recognizes Birmingham, Alabama, as the 

2 home to the first and longest running celebration of 

3 Veterans Day; 

4 (2) recognizes Raymond Weeks for his pio5 neering efforts in the establishment of Veterans 

6 Day; and 

7 (3) honors the sacrifices and pays tribute to the 

8 men and women in uniform who are risking life and 

9 limb at home and overseas. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS